The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02.04.02 Council Packet City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 A Proud Past - A Promising Future Committed to Providing High Quality, Timely and Responsive Service to All Of Our Customers AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 4, 2002 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Action Taken 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. RoiL c~1 4. APPROVEAGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Openfor Audience Comments) 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (1122/02 Regular) b) Approve LELS Contract - Administration c) Approve Change Order - City Facilities Project - Engineering d) Approve Findings of Fact - Sign Appeal - Community Development e) Appointment Recommendation Parks and Recreation - Administration f) Accept Grant Dakota Electric - Finance g) Consider Resolution - Contingency Plan - Administration h) Approve Bills Approved R05-02 Approved Approved Approved Accepted R06-02 Approved 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. AWARDOFCONTRACT a) Consider Resolution - Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Extension Project - Engineering R07-02 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Tammy Nienaber - East Farmington Homeowners Association b) Recreational Vehicles Discussion Workshop - Community Development c) Traffic Calming Workshop - Engineering d) City Hall Facility Discussion Workshop - Administration e) December 2001 Financial Report - Finance f) LMC Legislative Conference - Administration Iriformation Received February 20, 2002 February 20, 2002 February 20, 2002 Iriformation Received Information Received 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS a) Consider Resolution - 2002 Sealcoat Project Feasibility Report - Engineering 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN ROB-02 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 A Proud Past - A Promising Future Committed to Providing High Quality, Timely and Responsive Service to All Of Our Customers AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 4, 2002 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVEAGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open/or Audience Comments) 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (1122/02 Regular) b) Approve LELS Contract - Administration c) Approve Change Order - City Facilities Project - Engineering d) Approve Findings of Fact - Sign Appeal- Community Development e) Appointment Recommendation Parks and Recreation - Administration f) Accept Grant Dakota Electric - Finance g) Consider Resolution - Contingency Plan - Administration h) Approve Bills 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. AWARDOFCONTRACT a) Consider Resolution - Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Extension Project - Engineering 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Tammy Nienaber - East Farmington Homeowners Association b) Recreational Vehicles Discussion Workshop - Community Development c) Traffic Calming Workshop - Engineering d) City Hall Facility Discussion Workshop - Administration e) December 2001 Financial Report - Finance f) LMC Legislative Conference - Administration 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Action Taken Pages 174-179 Pages 180-181 Pages 182-184 Pages 185-187 Page 188 Page 189 Pages 190-192 Pages 193 Pages 194-200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Pages 204-205 Page 206 12. NEW BUSINESS a) Consider Resolution - 2002 Sealcoat Project Feasibility Report - Engineering Pages 207-219 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN ?a- COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR January 22, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Acting Mayor Verch at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Acting Mayor Verch led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Audience: Verch, Cordes, Soderberg, Strachan Ristow Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Ed Shukle, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Lee Mann, City Engineer; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Manager; Mike Schultz, Associate Planner; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Glenn and Kim Friedrich, Terry Mahoney, David Adams, John Hill, Michelle Leonard, Robert Kirk 4. APPROVE AGENDA Councilmember Strachan pulled the Special Minutes of 1/12/02 to abstain from voting as he was absent from that meeting. City Administrator Shukle added Executive Session to discuss labor negotiations. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Strachan to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. s. ANNOUNCEMENTS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS 7. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg to approve Council Minutes (1/12/02 Special). Voting for: Verch, Cordes Soderberg. Abstain: Strachan. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Strachan to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approved Council Minutes (1/7/02 Regular) b) Approved Appointments Boards and Commissions - Administration c) Approved Quit Claim Deed Presbyterian Cemetery - Administration d) Received Annual Report - Boards and Commissions - Administration e) Received Information Capital Outlay - Public Works f) Adopted RESOLUTION R02-02 Approving CDBG Application - Community Development g) Adopted RESOLUTION R03-02 Accepting Private Development Project Closeout - Engineering h) Received Information School and Conference - Police ) -; t../ Council Minutes (Regular) January 22, 2002 Page 2 i) Received Information School and Conference - Fire Department j) Approved Bills APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Customer Service Response Report - Administration The quarterly Customer Service Response Report was presented to Council, which shows the results of citizen requests, how staff responded, and if the residents were satisfied. Councilmember Soderberg stated Courteous and Helpful is consistent at 1000.10 and that is commendable. b) Consider Ordinance - Approve Rezoning Landscape Depot Property - Community Development ' Mr. Colin Garvey has applied to rezone the property located along 5th Street (Block 30) from R-2 (Medium Density) to B-3 (Heavy Business). This is consistent with the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is seeking to rezone the parcels to allow for future expansion of the Landscape Depot operation. He would be required to install screening along the south side of the property. MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg adopting ORDINANCE 002-468 rezoning the subject property from R-2 (Medium Density) to B-3 (Heavy Business) following the designated land use indicated within the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Hometown Sign Appeal- Community Development Ms. Kim Friedrich of Hometown, Inc. has filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision on January 8, 2002 in support of Planning staff's decision in the denial of appellant's sign permit application for a proposed wall sign for the business located at 331 3rd Street. A denial letter dated November 14, 2001 was sent informing the applicant that the permit application was denied based on the following guidelines outlined in the City's Sign Ordinance: 1. Under Section 4-3-1: Definitions, wall signage is defined as a sign affixed directly to an exterior wall and may project from the wall no more than 15 inches from all points of the sign. 2. Under Section 4-3-3 (B)la: Signs in the B and I Districts do not allow for more than two wall signs on one building face. Ms. Friedrich applied for a sign in a "V" shape extending out 15 inches, having two cabinet signs on the face of the front wall. The language states at all points the sign cannot extend out more than 15 inches. Staff interpreted that to mean all portions of the sign must be equal, the sign cannot protrude out from the building. The second part of the ordinance states no more than two wall signs on one building face. Separate cabinet signs are shown that would be attached to the "V" frame. As the signs are exactly the same, staff viewed them as two separate signs. /. 7.5 Council Minutes (Regular) January 22, 2002 Page 3 Ms. Friedrich requested the City's development committee review the sign permit application. The committee agreed the Planning staffs interpretation of the sign ordinance was correct. The sign plans were also forwarded to the City Attorney for review. The City Attorney agreed that the Planning staffs interpretation of the City's sign ordinance was supportable. The appellant requested that staff review existing commercial signage (photos were presented to Council) within the downtown inquiring why other businesses were permitted two or more cabinet signs. Staff explained even though there appears to be more than one cabinet sign in the photos, they were just assembled that way and they are seen as one sign. If she wanted to put her two signs together, it would be viewed as one sign. Staff also suggested placing one of the signs on the rear of the store. Some of the signs on existing downtown businesses predated the sign ordinance. On January 8,2002, the Planning Commission heard Ms. Friedrich's appeal of the decision of Planning staff to deny her sign permit applications. The Planning Commission voted in support of staffs decision for denial. Councilmember Soderberg noticed that in Ms. Friedrich's letter of January 11, 2002, she stated approximately September 5 a gentleman from Signtronixs went to the City to get preliminary approval. Councilmember Soderberg asked what the preliminary approval was. Associate Planner Schultz stated he did not recall. He vaguely remembered a gentleman came in regarding erecting a sign on the property. It is usually requested documentation be submitted and reviewed before approval is given. Councilmember Soderberg stated he could see where the language in the ordinance could be confusing. Staff is in the process of redoing the sign ordinance with the Zoning Code Update. Councilmember Cordes asked when the permit was submitted. Associate Planner Schultz stated the complete application was submitted in early November. Councilmember Strachan stated the last thing he wants to do is create hurdles. He wants them to have a good business. However, staff has been reasonable in terms of offering a solution. Councilmember Strachan asked Ms. Friedrich what her opinion is of Signtronixs as far as their responsibility. Ms. Kim Friedrich, Hometown Inc, stated the contractor came and they walked up and down the street and there was no indication she could not have a sign like this. She stated the sign would not have to protrude out 15 inches. She would prefer it not to be flat. She has been in that location for six years and still gets people every week that do not know the business is there. Associate Planner Schultz stated the other issue is still the two cabinet signs. The other possibility was to replace the faceplate of one of the cabinet signs to something different so that it would appear to be two separate signs. Ms. Friedrich stated she has a problem with that also. She feels none of the other businesses have one cabinet signs. Councilmember Strachan stated the ordinance reads no more than two signs, so two signs are allowed. Councilmember Soderberg stated the problem is going from a protruding sign to a flat sign. According to staff, even one or two inches are not acceptable according to the ordinance. He can see where there is some ambiguity in the ordinance. He has no problem with the sign; the problem 17~ Council Minutes (Regular) January 22, 2002 Page 4 is how to interpret the ordinance. Ms. Friedrich stated there were people on the Planning Commission that did not want to vote that way and they said it. Councilmember Strachan stated the Planning Commission is saying this is how we interpret the ordinance. Personal feelings should not enter into it. Ms. Friedrich stated the ordinance is not clear enough for her to let this go for that much money. Councilmember Soderberg asked when the new ordinance would be done. Staff replied March or April. Councilmember Soderberg stated Ms. Friedrich's letter stated Mr. Adams came to the City to get preliminary approval. What did that amount to? Mr. Dave Adams, Signtronixs, replied he did not meet Mr. Friedrich. He came to City Hall and obtained the sign ordinance. This is the same ordinance he sees in every City except for a few changes. He reviewed the ordinance and this sign was designed specifically for this ordinance. As far as the 15-inch projection, no other City considers that to mean parallel. The wall sign definition does not fit that sign. This is a sign you do not have defined. If the definition of a wall sign is that it has to be parallel, that is not a wall sign. It therefore, is a sign outside of the ordinance. It has to be allowed, because you do not disallow it. Councilmember Soderberg asked City Attorney Jamnik if that is defensible? Attorney Jamnik stated yes. The definition of wall sign is a sign fixed directly to the exterior wall or screening surface and confined within the limits thereof and which projects from that surface less than 15 inches at all points, would lend itself to different interpretations. It could mean flat and uniform, or less than 15 inches at all points. Councilmember Strachan stated he sees a hardship in the fact that money has been invested for a small business in our downtown. With respect to the Planning Commission's decision, which was correct in terms of the technical violation of the ordinance, he would suggest an 8 or 10 inch allowable protrusion. Mr. Adams stated that would not work, as the frame alone is 6 inches thick. Councilmember Soderberg stated he has no problem with 15 inches. It is not that intrusive. It would provide a little variety in the downtown. Associate Planner Schultz asked for Council's interpretation if this is considered as one cabinet sign or one principal sign? Councilmember Cordes stated she would consider it a principal sign. Associate Planner Schultz stated there would be a precedent set in place. Two signs are being erected on one wall frontage. It is a single frame, with two cabinets. Councilmember Cordes stated according to other signs, they are considered as one sign with different cabinets. She would view it as one principal sign. Councilmember Soderberg agreed. Attorney Jamnik stated there is a provision in the code stating if there are multiple occupants in the building, each tenant gets one sign. The first interpretation of no more than 15 inches from any point is rational. The way it is being proposed, it looks more like one sign. Councilmember Soderberg asked what kind of Findings of Fact would be needed to overturn the Planning Commission's decision? Attorney Jamnik stated it is probably best to direct the Planning division in the Attorney's office to develop Findings of Fact consistent with the Council's determination and return those at a future Council Meeting. We will also look at revising the ordinance. ,/7/ Council Minutes (Regular) January 22, 2002 Page 5 Councilmember Soderberg stated as the ordinance can be interpreted either way, he would rule in favor of the appellant and allow installation of the sign. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Strachan to overturn the Planning Commission's decision and allow installation of the sign. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. d) Building Permit Report - Community Development During the fourth quarter of the 2001 building construction season, the City issued 76 new single-family housing permits and 71 new multi-family permits. The year-end numbers are 227 new single-family units and 259 new townhome units for a total of 486 new building permits issued. This is an increase of 13.6% over last year's total of 427 residential units. The City also issued four new commercial permits, for new public/institutional permits, and two new industrial building permits. e) Cable Commission Press Release -Administration The Cable Commission is creating a second government access channel. This will provide coverage for Rosemount Council Meetings and Dakota County Board taped replays. Rosemount Council Meetings will be broadcast live beginning February 5, 2002. 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Authorize Use of Eminent Domain - Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Extension Project - Engineering This item was continued from the January 7, 2002 Council Meeting in which Council directed staff to arrange a meeting with the Donnelly's and the school. That meeting did occur and went well. Discussions between the Donnelly's and the school are ongoing and are positive in nature. However, the City and the Donnelly's are still negotiating for the easements. Therefore, staff recommended Council authorization to start the 90-day quick take process to ensure the project will be done in time for the school to open in the fall. Attorney Jamnik stated under the statute legal mailed notice has to be provided to the property owner and interested parties. Then staff has to wait 90 days before paying in the amount estimated to compensate the owner for the quick take. No action can be taken for 90 days. Unless staff takes the first step, the City is precluded from following through on the condemnation until authorization is received from Council and notice is served. It is recommended the notice be served and start the clock running on the condemnation procedures to make sure the City has the property in time to do the public improvements. This would give the City 90 days to negotiate with the property owner to seek an agreeable solution or settlement without having to go through a legal procedure. Councilmember Strachan asked if the timeline was just to ensure the school can open in time. Staff replied that is correct. Councilmember Soderberg stated it sounds like progress is being made. He is not in favor of eminent domain, however in some circumstances it is necessary. This is a purely public project for purely public purposes. That was the intent for eminent domain. Because we are up against a timeline, he would agree with staffs recommendation. 17~ Council Minutes (Regular) January 22, 2002 Page 6 Councilmember Cordes stated two weeks ago they agreed in good faith to give the Donnelly's time to meet with the school, but said Council would also continue with the process. Mr. Bob Donnelly stated things are going positively, they just ran out of time. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes adopting RESOLUTION R04-02 to commence with eminent domain proceedings for the necessary easements for the Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Extension Project. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Councilmember Strachan: The Fire Department held their Annual Meeting last week. ALF Ambulance was invited and stated they had a great time. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes to recess the Regular Council Meeting at 7:57 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Labor Negotiations The regular Council Meeting resumed at 8:51 p.m. City Administrator Shukle introduced the City's Labor Relations Attorney, Annette Margarit to report the results of the Executive Session regarding labor negotiation strategy. Annette stated staff updated Council on the status of negotiations with AFSCME. Staff asked Council if they were moving in the right direction. They discussed current affairs and the market level. Council concurred staff should continue on the current path. Staff will proceed to continue with negotiations. 15. ADJOURN MOTION by Cordes, second by Strachan to adjourn at 8:53 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant /7'7' 76 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator f). FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Manager SUBJECT: Labor Negotiation Settlements - 2002 Police Officers DATE: February 4, 2002 INTRODUCTION This memorandum has been, prepared to update Council on the status of the City's labor settlement with the Police Officers. DISCUSSION The City has reached a collective bargaining agreement with the LELS bargaining unit effective January 1, 2002. This agreement provides for a two percent (2%) wage adjustment effective January 1 and July 1 for both 2002 and 2003. The City will continue to contribute a flat rate amount for group insurance provided by the City. This contribution amount will be determined as insurance premium rates increase but will generally be no less than $536.00 for 2002 and $563.00 for 2003. BUDGET IMPACT Settlement costs negotiated with the LELS bargaining unit are within the financial guidelines adopted by Council in the 2002 City Budget. ACTION REOUESTED Adopt the attached resolution ratifying collective bargaining agreement for the Patrol Unit. Respectfully submitted, bl;(L ~~ /B;;n'd;Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Manager I~O RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING WAGE INCREASES BETWEEN THE CITY OF FARMINGTON AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC, LOCAL 187 POLICE OFFICERS UNIT FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR 2002. Pursuant to due call and notice, thereof, a regular meeting of the City council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 4th day of February, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: WHEREAS, the City of Farmington recognizes LELS as the exclusive bargaining representative under M. S. Chapter 179A, for the police officer classification identified in the collective bargaining agreement; WHEREAS, the City has negotiated in good faith with representatives of LELS for the purpose of reaching a collective bargaining agreement for the contract years 2002 and 2003; and WHEREAS, the settlement terms have been successfully negotiated between the City and the membership of Law Enforcement Labor Services, Local 187 in accordance with procedures established by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Farmington, Minnesota approves the following: 1) A two percent (2%) wage adjustment effective the 151 day of January, 2002 and a two percent (2%) wage adjustment effective the 1st day of July, 2002. 2) A two percent (2%) wage adjustment effective the 1st day of January, 2003 and a two percent (2%) wage adjustment effective the 1st day of July, 2003. 3) The City shall contribute a flat rate amount for health, dental and life insurance. This rate will be determined as insurance rates increase but shall be no less than $536.00 for 2002 and $563.00 for 2003. Adopted by the Farmington City Council this 4th day of February, 2002. Mayor Attested to the _ day of 2002. City Administrator SEAL /~/ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farminlrton.mn.us 7c,. {,<. TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Approve Change Order - City Facilities Project DATE: February 4, 2002 INTRODUCTION Forwarded herewith for Council's review and consideration is Change Order #3 for the City's facilities project. DISCUSSION The attached memo from WOLD Architects outlines the recommended expenditures for change order #3. The most significant cost is the change from area drains in the Central Maintenance Facility to trench drains. The change to trench drains will significantly improve the drainage in the building and the maintenance of the drainpipes. There are sand traps that are integral to the trench drain system that will be included on the next change order. BUDGET IMPACT The total cost for change order #3 is $38,447.00. The project's contingency fund balance including the expenditure for change order #3 is $500,000. ACTION REOUESTED Approve by motion, Change Order # 3 for the City Facilities project in the amount of $38,447.00. Respectfully Submitted, ~M~~ Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file J<:6c:? ,\l I: M 0 I~ .\ N Ll LT T\.1 WOLD ARCHITECTS It! 001 01/28/02 13:11 FAX 651 223 5646 rngLD WI)l.D .ll.IlCI-IITHCTS Al'ID ENCllNllllllS 305 ST, PI;'I'~R SHHH'I S'r PIIIIl. MN 5510l 651.227,777'; FAX 65 J..2:!;l.5 (,.:; 6 TO: Lee Mann 15 Sllll'l'lI GIll,lV~; AIII!NlIE SlIlTH 500 ELlll~. TL 60130 fl47,60!U600 FAX 80,6013,1(,54 f.l{OM: John McNamara: ~ DATE: January 28, 200~ COMM. NO: 00086 WWW,wOLt'^f.,C,:llM MAILCg.Wlll,IlAll, co M SUfiJECT: Farmington North Municipal Campus - Phase 1 Per discussion with the Core Group on January 24, 2002, the following are recommended contract changes for the North Municipal Campus. The approved costs represent a fair value for the work performed. Upon approval by City Council, we will issuc Change Order #3 for the; project. ltem Description Aoorovcd Cost PR #7, Item 2 A cabinet unit heater for the Police Break. Room <$1,180.00> was deleted based on coordination of furniture layout. This resulted in a credit. PR#10,Itcm I A drinking fountain was added to the Fitness $2,801.00 Room at the Police Station. PR#IO, Item 2 Additional fire alann devices are necessaI)' in a $5,039.00 few Tooms based on final coordination. PR #10, Item 3 A smoke exhaust is being added to the holding $1,896.00 area at the Police Station. This cost is for the electrical connections. The mechanical cost will is being reviewed and will be processed with the next Change Order. This smoke exhaust will enhance expansion of this area in the future. PR. #11, Item 'I Trench drains were deleted during the design $18,172.00 process to help with overall project cost_ Adding these will enhance building operation. PR#13, Item 2 This cost is to add remote operation to the $4,505.00 overhead doors at the Police Station. This enhal1cement will allow the receptionist to operate the doors from the office area. PR#14, Item l' Outlets were added to the offices at the Police $2,964.00 Station to work better with the new systems fumituxl;: being quoted separately. Misc. Cost #7 As agreed previously, this cost was to complete $4,250.00 the brick work at the Police Station with heat and cover. Total Change Order #3 $38,447.00 /~3 ~OLD AR9J1ITECTS 01/28/02 13:11 FAX 651 223 5646 UJ g lD Memorandum to Lee Mann Page Two Per our letter to Rochon dated October 26, 2001, we are not recommending a time extension at the Police Station or the Central Maintenance Facility. If you have any questions, please can. cc: Robin RolaIild, City of Farmington BaIT)' Badiriger, E & V Michael Cox Brendon Stl!1.ckey RblO0086/jan02 !gj 002 1~'1 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us ;lei TO: Mayor and Council Members, City Administratorf.\. FROM: Michael Schultz Associate Planner SUBJECT: Findings of Fact, Hometown, Inc. Appeal DATE: February 4, 2002 INTRODUCTION Attached are the Findings of Fact of the City Council of the appeal filed by Kim Friedrich, Hometown Inc. concerning the denial of her sign permit application. DISCUSSION The Findings of Fact were based on the discussion and decisions made by the City Council during its January 22, 2002 meeting. The appeal resulted from the decision of Planning Staff and supported by the Planning Commission in the denial of her sign permit. ACTION REQUESTED Review and accept the attached Findings of Fact. /C?5 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA INRE: Appeal of Sign Permit Denial-- Hometown Inc. FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION On January 22, 2002, the Fannington City Council met to consider the application of Hometown Inc. (hereafter Hometown) regarding a denial of its application for a pennit to place a wall sign on its building located at 331 3rd Street The hearing was conducted following an appeal by Hometown of the City Planning Commission's decision to affmn the staff denial of the pennit application. Hometown's request to the City Council on its appeal was for the Council to overturn the Commission's decision and to order the issuance of the sign pennit as requested by Hometown in its application. The record in this matter includes: the application; pertinent City Code sections relied on by staff for the denial of the pennit (specifically City Code Sections 4-3-1 and 4-3-3(B)la); letters between Hometown and City staff; materials presented to the City Planning Commission and City Council, including diagrams and pictures of the proposed sign, and; other materials created or collected by the City and presented to the Planning Commission and City Council, all of which are hereby incorporated as support for the following detennination. The City Council conducted a public hearing on the appeal and the proposal was preceded by published and mailed notice. The applicant was present and the Council heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed sign complies with City Code Section 4-3-1 because as designed, manufactured and proposed to be installed no portion of the sign will project from the building wall more than fifteen (15) inches. 2. The proposed sign as designed, consisting of two independent cabinets joined at an angle, could be considered as two (2) wall signs on one (1) building face, and is readily capable of being so modified to provide multiple signage, which would violate City Code Section 4-3-3 (B)la. 3. However, the sign, as manufactured and currently lettered by Hometown, does not violate City Code Section 4-3-3 (B)la in that the sign consists of a single integrated advertisement for a single business in a compact unit within the overall square footage and design requirements of the City Code. 4. While as currently lettered and proposed to be installed the sign meets the requirements of the Farmington City Code, future modifications to either the lettering or installation of the sign could result in a Code violation. DECISION Based on the record developed in this matter and the Findings of Fact recited above, and without prejudice to the City of applying the sign provisions of the City Code in the future to the applicant should any modifications be made to the sign, the City Council hereby detennines that the sign as manufactured and proposed to be installed is in compliance with the City Code and that staff shall issue the requisite penn its to allow its installation. 61335 1<=6~ CITY OF FARMINGTON BY: Gerald F. Ristow Mayor A TIEST: Ed Shukle City Administrator 61335 2 /q,/ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7e- TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator~" ~4 FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR SUBJECT: Appointment Recommendation - Parks and Recreation DATE: February 4, 2002 INTRODUCTION The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of the new Recreation Program Supervisor has been completed. DISCUSSION After a thorough review of all applicants for the Recreation Program Supervisor position by the Director of Parks and Recreation and Human Resources Office, a contingent offer of employment has been made to Ms. Patti Norman, subject to ratification by the City Council. Ms. Norman is currently the Recreation Manager for the Grand Forks Park District. She has worked for this agency since 1982 and has experience in all areas of Recreation. Based on her knowledge and experience, Ms. Norman meets or exceeds the minimum requirements for the position. BUDGET IMP ACT Funding for this position is authorized in the 2001 budget. RECOMMENDATION Approve the appointment of Ms. Patti Norman as Recreation Program Supervisor, effective on or about February 19,2002. Respectfully submitted, ~l~~dt;- / Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Manager )~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7-F TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~~. Robin Roland, Finance Director Accept Grant Funds - Dakota Electric Association February 4, 2002 INTRODUCTION The City has received a $5,000 Partners in Progress Grant from Dakota Electric. DISCUSSION The Dakota Electric Partners in Progress program has been a vital resource to the City of Farmington. Previous years funding has supported the update of the Comprehensive Plan in 1998 and establishment of the Arts Park by the Dakota Valley Arts Council in 2000. Grant funding awarded to the City this year will be used to upgrade the City's web site and to market the community for economic development purposes. The City is grateful to Dakota Electric for its willingness to continue the Partners in Progress program and to aid the City in its continuing pursuit of making Farmington a "business friendly" community by strengthening existing businesses and attracting new businesses. ACTION REQUESTED Accept the $5,000 Partners in Progress grant from Dakota Electric. /ljj'-? Finance Director ./~ City of Farmington 325. Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us (J TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator f ~. FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Manager SUBJECT: Consider Resolution - Contingency Plan DATE: February 4, 2002 INTRODUCTION, The AFSCME, Council 14, Local Union 2815 Maintenance Unit notified the City of its intention to strike. A legal strike may begin as early as Saturday, February 9, 2002. This memorandum. - provides information regarding the preparations being made in anticipation of said strike. DISCUSSION The City of Farmington must take responsible precautions to ensure necessary public services will be provided in the event of a strike or work stoppage.. The attached resolution directs City Officials and Department Directors to make preparations that will ensure the continuation of necessary public services. Such preparations shall establish priorities for City services and communications to Council, citizens and employees during this time period. This resolution empowers the City Administrator with the authority to do all things necessary to secure the safety of the public, employees, and public property as well as ensure the continued operations and proper administration of essential functions of the City of Farmington. ACTION REQUEST Adopt the attached resolution regarding the contingency preparation in the event of the impending strike by the AFSCME, Council 14, Local Union 2815 Maintenance Unit. Respectfully submitted, .I /'/ .1dL I ./ i/i I ./ j ,/:; " ,'(" _ r I.-j ~i - <~/ cMIi-.:'~rr.A!:~~d. t Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Manager 190 RESOLUTION NO. R -02 APPROVING STRIKE CONTINGENCY PREPARATION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 4th day of February 2002 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Farmington is committed to sound collective bargaining principles and practices which will serve to resolve differences to the mutual satisfaction of the parties and avert, to the greatest extent possible, work actions such as strikes. However, recognizing that a work action is the ultimate exercise of bargaining power unions may employ as an economic sanction against the City in the event bargaining demands cannot be satisfied and recognizing that the City must take responsible precautions to ensure necessary public services will be provided in the event such action is employed, City officials and department heads are hereby directed to make such preparations as will ensure continuation of necessary public services. Such preparations shall, among other things, provide that: 1. Priorities are established for all services provided by the department from critical - which may not be interrupted - to the minimum level of service that can be maintained. 2. Instruction is given to supervisory personnel regarding their responsibilities and conduct during a strike. 3. All employees are advised of their rights and responsibilities during a strike and the City's policy regarding striking employees. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the event of a strike action against the City, the following policies will apply uniformly and consistently in accordance with state laws to all employees who engage or participate in such strike action: 1. Any employee who is absent from any portion of hislher work assignment without permission of the appropriate department head on the date or dates when a strike occurs will be presumed to have engaged in a strike on such date or dates and shall not be permitted to return to work until the conclusion of the strike. 2. No wages or benefits shall be paid to any employee engaging in a strike. 3. If the City owes striking employees any wages for hours worked before the strike, the City will issue paychecks for the amount of those wages to striking employees on the first regularly scheduled payday after the commencement of a strike. 4. The City will discontinue contribution to all group insurance coverage for the striking employees to the extent provided by law. Notice by letter will be provided to such employees on how they may continue to maintain group coverage. 5. No striking employee shall be entitled to vacation pay even if vacations were previously scheduled. )9/ 6. No sick leave shall be granted to a striking employee. 7. No striking employee shall be eligible for any type of leave, including attendance at conferences and conventions. 8. There shall be no service credit for benefit accrual purposes during a strike period to any employee participating in such action. 9. No holiday pay will be granted to a striking employee. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that employees in a striking bargaining unit will be advised of their right to work during a strike action and the following City policies will apply uniformly and consistently to all non-striking bargaining unit employees during a strike action: 1. All leaves of absence for non-striking employees in affected departments will be automatically cancelled unless authorized by the City Administrator. Any leaves of absence during a period when a strike is taking place may be granted only with the approval of the department head and the City Administrator. 2. Non-striking employees may be required to present written medical certification of illness to be eligible for sick leave. 3. Non-striking employees who by virtue of a strike are unable to use vacation and would forfeit vacation hours shall be allowed to accrue vacation in excess of the vacation accrual maximum and shall, after the conclusion of the strike, be permitted to reduce the vacation balance below the maximum accrual at the earliest possible date following the conclusion of a strike. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Administrator only is authorized to speak publicly on behalf of the City in regard to labor disputes in which a union work stoppage has commenced or is imminent. BE IT FINALLY RESOL VED, that because the City has been served with a notice of intent to strike by a bargaining unit and for the duration of any work stoppage only, the City Administrator hereby is empowered to do all things reasonably necessary to secure the safety of the public, employees and public property and ensure the continued operations and proper administration of essential functions of the City of Farmington notwithstanding any existing resolution, policy, budget restrictions or directives of the City Council in and for the City of Farmington, Minnesota which would preclude or otherwise limit the City Administrator in the full exercise of sound discretion in maintaining and protecting City functions and services. Adopted by the Farmington City Council this 4th day of February, 2002. Mayor Attested to the _ day of 2002. City Administrator SEAL 19~ 9'~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farminlrton.mn.us TO: M C '1 b C' Ad . . {~. ayor, ounCl mem ers, Ity mlmstrator FROM: Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Award of Contract - Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Extension Project DATE: February 4, 2002 INTRODUCTION Bids were received for the Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Extension Project on Thursday, January 24,2002. DISCUSSION S.J. Louis Construction, Inc. has submitted the low base bid in the amount of $438,181.50 and alternate #1 in the amount of$11,000.00. The total construction cost of the project based on the base bid and alternate #1 is $449,181.50. Alternate #1 provides for re-mobilization costs if the easements for the project are not acquired in the time frame necessary for the contractor to finish the water main work in the easement areas at the same time as the rest of the work. The Contractor has agreed to a completion date of no later than June 30, 2002, in the case that the easements are ultimately acquired through the City's powers of eminent domain. BUDGET IMPACT The total estimated project cost including contingencies and legal, engineering and administrative costs based on the bid is $627,600. The estimated project cost in the feasibility report was $593,000.00. The difference in the estimated project costs is due to Alternate #1 and additional features that were added during the design to the water main part of the project. The costs for the trunk sanitary sewer and water main would be, for the most part, financed from the City's Trunk Sewer and Water funds. A small percentage of the water main costs are attributed and allocated to the new elementary school for improvements related to their water service. /9'1 Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Project February 4, 2002 Page 2 ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution accepting the base bid and alternate #1 of S.J. Louis Construction, Inc, awarding the contract, with the change to the completion date to be no later than June 30, 2002, in the case that the easements are ultimately acquired through eminent domain. Respectfully Submitted, ~In~ Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file 195 RESOLUTION NO. R -02 AWARD BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 01-17 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 4th day of February, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. Members present: Members absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor low S.J. Louis Construction, Inc. #2 S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. #3 Lloyds Construction Services #4 Municipal Contracting Services #5 Richard Knutson, Inc. ; and, Total Base Bid $438,181.50 $449,110.97 $453,333.00 $458,151.00 $482,440.85 Alternate #1 Bid Amount $11,000.00 $3,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 Total Bid Plus Alternate #1 $449,181.50 $452,610.97 $458,333.00 $460,151. 00 $483,440.85 WHEREAS, it appears the firm of S.J. Louis Construction, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. The base bid and alternate #1 of S.J. Louis Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, for $449,181.50 are hereby accepted and awarded and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract therefore. 2. The completion date for the project will be no later than June 30, 2002, in the case that the easements required for the project are acquired through the process of eminent domain. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 4th day of February 2002. Mayor day of 2002. Attested to the SEAL City Administrator /9~ a Bonestroo _ _ Rosene ~ Anderlil< & . \J. Associates Engineers & Architects January 25,2002 Sonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik and Associates. Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Emplo~r/ and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. PE. . Marvin L. Sorvala. PE. . Glenn R. Cook. P.E. . Robert G. Schunicht. PE. . Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene. PE. . Joseph C. Anderlik, PE. . Richard E. Turner, PE. . Susan M. Eberlin. C.PA. Associate Principals: Keith A. Gordon. PE. . Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. . Richard W. Foster, PE. . David O. Loskota. PE. . Mark A. Hanson, PE. . Michael T. Rautmann, PE. . Ted K. Field, PE. . Kenneth P Anderson, PE. . Mark R. Rolfs, PE. . David A. Bonestroo. M.B.A. . Sidney P Williamson, PE., L.S. . Agnes M. Ring. M.B.A. . Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. . Thomas W. Peterson, PE. . James R. Maland. PE. . Miles B. Jensen, PE. . L. Phillip Gravel III, PE. . Daniel J. Edgerton. PE. . Ismael Martinez, PE. . Thomas A. Syfko. PE. . Sheldon J. Johnson. Dale A. Grove. PE. . Thomas A. Roushar. PE. . Robert J. Devery. PE. Offices: St. Paul. St. Cloud, Rochester and Willmar, MN . Milwaukee, WI . Chicago. IL Website: www.bonestroo.com Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington MN 55024-1374 Re: Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Project Bonestroo File No. 141-01-155 Recommendation of Contract Award Honorable Mayor and City Council: Bids were opened for the project stated above on Thursday, January 24, 2002 at 2:00 P.M., C.S.T. Transmitted herewith are ten (10) copies of the bid tabulation for your information and file. Copies will also be distributed to each bidder. There were a total of twenty (20) bids. The following summarizes the results of the low five (5) bids received: Low #2 #3 #4 #5 Contractor SJ. Louis Construction, Inc. S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. Lloyds Construction Services Municipal Contracting Services Richard Knutson, Inc. Base Bid Amount $438,181.50 $449,110.97 $453,333.00 $458,151.00 $482,440.85 Alternate #1 Bid Amount $11,000.00 $3,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 The low bidder on the project was SJ. Louis Construction, Inc. with a Base Bid of $438,181.50. This compares to the Engineer's Estimate of $550,000.00. These bids have been reviewed and found to be in order. All of the above Contractors have proven they are capable of performing the work associated with this type of project. If the City Council wishes to award the project to the low bidder, then 8.J. Louis Construction, Inc. should be awarded the project on the Base Bid Amount of $438,181.50. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at . Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Q- -rC~ Darren T. Amundsen, P.E. Enclosures DT A/lae K:\141 \141 01 1 55\Word\Specifications'Specifications Draftlclientbidtabletter.doc 2335 West Highway 36-. St. Paul, MN 55113. 651-636-4600 · Fax: 651-636-1311 19/ ti ~ Ql c: lU .!!l .Ct) oS (ij :6 C 'e ~ S l!? Ql .c: jui a.: c ~ ~ .~ ~~ ~ r: ; 1 ~ ~ ~Q c3 ~ o 'II: l5 c: :u ~ -6 ~ e '[5, ~ ~ ll'l ll'l .... , ;;; ~ .... - C3 c o iii c Gl '$( W .. S III 3= "0 C III ci z ..2! u:: li; ~ o :2 a. o o N 1ij N o o N ~ N .. III - C III en ~ c ~ .. I- .l/: Gl Gl o QI :c "0 i CD E III Z '0 Q) '[ a. ci z '0 Q) 'e- o. III "0 l!? ~ .J::. I- i:D c '2 Q) 0. o "0 iii o 04~e e ~.... ~ 1;;; ~ 'E.!:2 '6 ~cu-8a< I~Lg~< i ~C~i Ll) o z .. Gl "0 "0 CD Dl C n III b c .,,0 .0 0- Z ~ III ..-Q) ~.2 .~ :2 5 ~ lD:2en c o +:: u ~ .. - Mill .C 00 ZO III ~ ~.~ "0 >- > :2..5! ~ lD..Jen ('\I o z .. CD "0 "0 CD ,.. o z .. Gl "0 "0 CD u .5 c o J!l ~ c ~ "0 .. III .J::. U a: u .5 III C o en all III Gl Dl - C Gl :t: :E en u .5 c o +:: u ~ .. - III C o o III :; o ..J .., en c o +:: III :; .c III I- "0 CD ai - o I- 000 000 cicici 000 Oll'lCO ":~N ~ ~ QI U ';: a. - C :) 000 OOC') dd"": OO~ OlO ,.:~ ~ 000 000 cicici OOCO 001'- c5ci~ N~~ ~ s o I- CD U ;: a. 00a) OOCO cicici OO~ 00 ON N~ ~ - c :) ai o I- 000 000 cicici 000 ll'lll'l0 NN<O ~~~ Gl U ';: a. 000 000 ciciM oo~ ll'lll'l NN ~~ - c :) ai - o I- NOO cooo ~Lrio ll'lNCO ll'lNCO ui"':N" ~~~ CD u .;: D. NOC") coOC") " to.",,: ll'l C\I ~ ll'l C\I ..n __.. ~~ - 'c :) ai - o I- 000 000 cicici 000 001'- ui"':C\i ~~~ Gl U ;: a. - C :) 00ll'l 00C") 00"': o O~ 00 u;"': ~~ 5 ........0 o o N - c :) CJ)CJ)u.. ....1....1....1 o o ci o C") ~ o o ci o C') ~ o o o o q W o o o o o. ..... ~ o o ci o Ll!. .... ~ o o g Ll!. W o o ci ll'l I'- ,.: N ~ o o ci ll'l ,.... ,.: N ~ o o ci o C':!. .... ~ o o ci o C':!. W <( w o N ci co ll'l N ll'l fI) C') ..... ~ C') ~ o o o o N <0 ." ~ o o o C") fI) o o ci o co o C") ~ o o o N ~ o o Lri co 0>. ~ ~ ll'l N ~ N ~ o o ci '<I' '<I' .n ll'l ~ o o Ici C") ~ o '<I' Ll!. .... u.. ....I ll'l '<I' a:i a) C") M N ~ C') o a:i C") fI) o o o ll'l '<I' ai W o o ci C") ~ o o Lri '<I' .... ~ w o o M N ~ ll'l I'- M co o. .... N ~ ll'l N ~ ~ o o Lri co 0> M N ~ o o cri C") ~ ll'l 10 u.. ....I o ,.... C\i ." ..... ~ fI) C") o Ici '<I' ~ o o o o co M ~ o o ci '<I' ~ o o ci "'t C") N ~ o o Ici C\I ~ o ll'l C\i C\I I'- N ~ ll'l N ci C") ~ o o ci N "'t M ~ o o a:i C") ~ o 0> u.. ....I o N a:i a) ll'l ~ N fI) co ..... ci ll'l ~ o o ci o co ai W o o ci "'t ~ o o o N I'- M W o o a:i N ~ o o Lri I'- C") ai W o ll'l ~ C") ~ o o ci 0> o o N ~ o C! ~ fI) o 0> "'t u.. ....I o ..... a:i ~ <0 W C') C! 10 ~ o o g co o W o o o "'t ~ o o ci "'t co ai ~ o o C\i C") fI) o o Lri o N. ..... .... ~ o .q ~ ~ o o ci N "'t N W o o Ici ~ o I'- N u.. ....I o I'- a:i 0> ll'l o N ~ 00000 00000 Lri~cicici ,....~lt)OCO <O(")C\J,-O) ~ fh 69- __- ai N fI) fI) 0000000Ll) OOOOOOOM ~gg~ggg~ "'tll'lO.....COCOCON ,...: &9- .,-- ,..: __- ......... ai yo- ~ ~~fI)~fI),... "I Cb lOOOOOOO NOOOll'lOO C\iLriciLricicici f:I7&9-.,....--f;R-OLO 69-f:17 0),.... __- C\i ~~ 00000000 00000000 ~ooLri~cicicri COOON.....COOr-- NOO....COll'l"'tco rn__"~"':"-:"":ai"': fl)fI)fI)fI)~~~CO ,.. Cb o>ooomoo 0>000"'t00 oooLricioci ut,....,......-69-mo ~~~ co..... ~N ~~ 00000000 :;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;; COOOll'l....OON 0> 001'-C")COCON c:ri,..:,..:69-N.qo"'-<i~ ~~~ ~~fI)W .... Cb 0000000 NOOOI'-OO "':ciooooo 69-......,....,....69-00 ~~~ "!oN. ~~ 0000000,.... OOOll'lOOOM LriciciC\iciC\iC\iLri C\lOO--LOcn--O I'-C")OI'-COI'-COW ciEl7"':EI7,..:r-:aiui ..... ~ ~~~N ~ "I Cb ll'l000000 NOOll'lll'lOO MMcicricia:iM ~~....~~"'t0 ~ 0> N __- C\i ~~ 00000000 :;;:;:;:;;~:;:;::! I'-NOI'-"'tOOM '<I'C")O> COOCO "'to> N~~~N":aiM fI) ~ ~ fI) 0> ,.. Cb ll'lOOONOO I'-NOOCOOO oMcricriooo ~~~~~O 0 0> .... ,-..N ~~ 000ll'l0"'t"'t 0001'-0 ('I).,....,.... C") M M u..>->-Zu..UU ....I UU 1-....1 <(<( .n .n <0 <0 <0 <0 t C') C') C\I N N N ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) ~ ll'l> >~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~x- o.'~ o.'~ o.'~ 'o.~ o.'~ o.'~ ~ OCOooo. > 5 CD _al en Cl.J::. .J::. C U'- ,ft ~ ~ ~ - - - - - "c:- ..iSS~ S_~n ~ ; s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ al ~~~~1ij B~~~mm~ Gl c: CD Q) Q) CD Q) Q) ~ Q)~~~~~ 5g~~~~~ en 0 CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) _ ~ ~oU-xxc >- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lIloSSo al>.c...~>~~~ ~ 3~ .S_ .S_ .S_ .S_ .S_ ~ ~ ~c'2'2- ~~ U# - -Cl~ c: c: c: c: c: ~ ~ .S_gffiffi~ ~~~~"O"O' cc:g~o alo.alo.alo.alo.alo.alo.~ c:al......li x~.c~Q)Q),.. ~._QC:o'~ CJ)~CJ)~CJ)~CJ)~CJ)~CJ)~_Q)al~SS"o~~~S~~~~ ,alO~=.....2!UOUOUOUOUOUo-o.lIl-Q)Q)Q)Q)OClalOI-I-III N > > O-UQ)EE>EE_Cl"O D. "'~ij:~~~~~~~~~o.~o.~~~>~~~e~Eg~~g8ai ~.gca--a:s. I....... I. '5>D...Q.i"C"Co..EOOQigocc:o ~:2~;8E~~~~~~~~~~~~u~~>~~_~uen<(G:2:21- ~NMv ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ E CD :: o Z C") C! ;::: ~ 00000 0,....000 LriLriciciC\i ............LO............ tOfI7C\J,......... ~ ~N~ ~ o o g <C!. ..... W 00000 00000 cicicicio 00000 ll'l"'tll'lll'l0 ~fI)~I'-'O 6;$ o o o "'t fI) ggggg ciciciciLri ONOll'lN ll'l~ll'll'-.... fI) ~.~ w o o o ll'l ..... o W 00000 00000 cicicicici OOll'lOCO OCOI'-OO> N~~.n~ ~ N N ~~ o o Lri C") ~ 00000 00000 ciciciciC\i 0C")ll'l0..... 0~1'-ll'lC") N ~N~ ~ fI) o o Lri o 0> N W 00000 00000 Lrioocio NCOONCO U')U')om,.... f:l7fF7~~<ti ~"'t~ ~ o ll'l ~ "'t ~ 00000 00000 LricriciC\i~ NNOO>I'- U')~O"""f:17 fF7 ......- -.::t- ~~ o o o N ~ W 00000 00000 cicicicici .....NOON oo...rtOO,.... ~~~M,.: N~ ~ o o cri "'t ~ 00000 00000 ci"':oocri ,....C\JOOCXJ co ~CO C") ~ ~ ~N ~ o 0> N ......0......00 N ....CO u.. ....I <(U-CJ)<(u.. W....l....lW....l ..... ~ m I- m ll'l ll'l ..... o ~ ..... Io/?' II) .. Gl " " iii Cl C ;:: u l! - c ..a: 8 0- Z [Ill .._Gl Gl U U :gc~ ._ ::J Gl lD:Een c o 1:; ::J .. - C')1Il . C o 0 zo :ll ~ ~.2 ">-~ !!..5! Gl lD.Jen .. Gl " " in ... ci Z .. Gl " " iii U .5 c o III - ::J C ~ " .. Cll .c U a: U .5 III C o en oil III Gl Cl 'E Gl :c :E en U .5 c o ;:: U ::J .. - III C o o III '5 o .J .., en c o i '3 ..Q ~ " in fti - o ~ 00 00 gg <OC\l N~ ~ Gl U '': II.. - C ~ 00 C'l0 "';Lri ~~ '!i o ~ 88 cici <01() 1'... ~~ Gl U ;: II.. - C ~ tOO tOO ciM ~~ fti - o ~ 00 ~~ 00 ov eD~ ~ Gl U ;: II.. - C ~ 00 00 Mai ~~ fti .. o ~ 00 00 cici <01() <0... N~ ~ Gl U ;: II.. C'l0 C'l0 "':ci ~~ - c ~ ii .. o ~ Gl U ;: II.. - C ~ 5 - c ~ E Gl = .Q 5 o 0) Qj c (j 0) c: E 0 0) 0 ~ ~ c.c: c Ul ai_::::J(ij :E..!!!g1ij ~ 5,'E.5 1ii~.a-g 3:: Cli:C III . 0 OJ Q) N5i~~ i~~~ II.. en a: a: o Z 00 00 cici 00 00) N~ ~ 00 00 ciLfi 0... ... ~ ~ 00 00 cici 0C\l <01' ~~ 00 00 ciC\i C'l,.... ~~ 00 ~~ 01' <0 ~ N ~ do C':lLl! Z;~ 00 81() N LL>- .Jen C'lVI() C\lC\lC\l Q; g .g .g ~~~"-~ CD~ CDQl~ CD~ ~~~g~ O)g: ~g; ~~ C c:c:-,,1Il g~i -~~ -j ii '~~o~~EIIl ~o~ ~~tOl ~-1Il m:E xx ~_ .~~, __ _ ~ OODCU eoa> ~oQ) ~~ ~~ ~~~IIl~ ~I. ~I. ~~ ~~ C:C:lIlc" " g O)CD_8 0)- ~3:: ~~~~Q)-Q)~- - -~~. O)O)>~~~e~~ ~i~ ~B CDN ~~~~Z~1lM i::' Mw i::' w~c~t: o>>O)O)m~CDO)e =CDIIl -_lIlo)CD~m ~~~.olll__~oO ~O& > EO II.. c.lIllllo>~~E~C.CDUlIll CDUleO)oii . 0 o. "1ii Ul Ul 0) "1ii ~ g .~ ~ ~ g .~ c. (; c: '0 ~~~~en55a:(I)~~a:(I)~~a:i~~~ 8888g88888888888888800000000000 ciciciciC\i~mciciciciciciLfiLficicicicici~~~~~~~~~~~ 00 000)1' C'l<O V 0,.... tOOC'lC'll'O to,.... I() I'C\l 1()001() <0 I() I() I() I() OOOtO,....C'ltOI()OI(),....~O)vvI'C\ltOI'vC\lC\ll'vC\l,....<OC\lC'l...C\l ci~N~~~O~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~MNm0~~~~~ ~~~~~~<O~~,.... ~ ~~ ~ ~~C\l ~~ (& ~ 69- 0000 0000 cicicici 0C\l00 C\l~O<O ~ -~ ~ I()OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ C\lC\lC'l<OtOl(),....tOI'C'lC'lo)OtO,....I()I'C\lC\lOI()I()<OI()~~~ ~~~~~C\l,....~VVVI()<OtOI'vC\lC\l<OtO<O,....<Ov ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ri~~~ ~ ~ ~ 0000000000000000000000000000000 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ll!Ll! OOOOI()C\lI()C\lVI()OOOOl'I'I()OI()OI()OOOOOOI(),....MM I() 0 0 I() to V OC'ltO 0)...,.... <0 VV I() 0 0<0 I() C'lC'l I() I' 0 I() I() I' 1'...... 0~N~~Mm~~~~0~~$~~~~~~~~NO~~oo~~0 ~~~ ~<O~,.... ~ ~~~ ~ ~~C'l ~ ,.... ~ ~ ~ 0000000000000000000000000000C'lC'lC'l OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOI()<O<O cicicici~mLfiLfiLfiLficiciciciLfiLfiLficiciciciciciciciciciciciC\iC\i I()C\lOO,....,....C'lI()<OI'OOOOl'C\lC\lOI()OI()OI()OI()OOI()~~~ ~~OI()~~~~~C\l,....,....vvvI()I()O<OI()C'lC'll'o)I'l()l()I' ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ri~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 00 cici 00 <0<0 ~~ 0000000000000000000000000000000 oooooooooooooooooooooo~~ooooooo ggggggggggggggggg~g*gg88ggggggg OC\lOvI'Ol'tO<OOvC'lvtOOC'll'<OC'l<OvvtOOtOl()<OI()I'I()C\l ~~~N0rim~~m~~ri~~ri~~~~~~~~O~~OON~~ ~~~~ ~v~~C\l ~ ~~~~~~ ~~C'l ~~ ,.... ~ ~ ~ 00 00 cici C'l,.... ~~ 0000000000000000000000000000000 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ OC'lOO,....,....C'lOOOOOI()I()OOI()OI()<O<OOOOI()OI()O~...~ ,....~l()tO~~~C\lC\lI()VC'ltOtOO,....tO<OC'l<OvvtOOtOl()<OI' ~ $ N~ ~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~$;M~~; ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ 00 00 cici <01' vI() ~~ 0000000000000000000000000000000 0000001()000000~~000~00~0000001()1()1() ~ggg~g~g~~g~g~~~g~m~~~~~~g~~~~~ <OtO,....I()I'OvOtOC'l~~I()C'lvI()OO<OC'lC\lv<OC'lC\l,....vl()v~,.... ~;ci;~ri~;~ri ;~~;;;~;~~MN~~~OO; 0 ~~~ ~C'l~,.... ~ ~~~ ~ ~~C\l ~~ ,.... ~ ~ ~ 00 01() Mm C\l ~ ~ 0000001()0000000000000000000001()1()1() 00001()0C\l000000~~0000~0000000001()0 ~~gg~~~~~~~~m~~~re~~~~~~~mg~~~~~ ~~OI()~~~~~C\l~~C'lC'lVI()I()O<OC'lC\lv<oI'...,....Vl' ~~ ~ ~~0~~~~~~~~~g0~~ 00 00 cici <0 to C'lv ~~ 0000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000 cicicicicicimci~ciciciciciciciciciciciciciciciciciciciLfiLfiLfi OOC\l,....O<OI'OtOvC'lO<OI'I'tO<oO)vO,....M<OC\lOOtOOl'OO O~~~OOO~N~~~~m~~m~mOO~MNMNO~OO~~~~ ;N;;0ri~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~OO~~~ ~~~~ ~I()~,.... ~ ~~ ~ ~~C\l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 00 aiai ,....~ ~ 0000000000000000000000000000000 OOOOOOMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOI(),....,.... ci~cici~~~ciaiciciciciciciciciciciciciciociciciciciciC\iC\i O,....<OI',....,....MI()<OMMOo)I'I'<OtOo)vO,....M<OvOOtOO~~~ ,....~I'v~~~~~C\l,....,....vvv<O<OO)tOMMC\lI()I'I()MtOI' ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ri~~~ ~ ~ ~ 00 C\l<O OO~MOOO~MOO~~~~~MN~~~~~~~OO~~~OOO ,....1() I()tOMC\l...1() I()I()I() ...... ~ 00 C'J_ ~ ,.... LLZ ..J~ ZLL~~LLLLLL~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~LLLLLL ~..JWW..J..J..JWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW..J..J.J CD C. g; '0.'~.5 :c .~ E III o ;:;,-E ...- 1ii CDIo.oC\JC\JLO II.. E.~I()I()Ul I()Cli o~~g:g:r,j en ~ Ui<<,a ..!.!2(3 r,j:J -,....tOuu. ~ -0 Soo-.C: 0) U 0 Ul .5 .5 .5 .5 .~ ~ Q)"'~ .SU)U)asasE"E"E~Q)1o.o Ul III ~ 'x 'x E E "- .- .- e ~ ~ .8~ "OQ)Q)G>Oi~~efii~g CD'-cu:::J fij.s.s1Um~Ciifiie"O-c :::aio......Q)oo3:;:a...!!Q)LO~ 5, ~.~ ~ ~:g :g !!: !!: is .~.~.~ ~ ~ "C ~~ ~-a g 50C~.a._o.(o;- x ~~m~enuu~~,....<otO,....tO~ " c:" ~ c: ..QCD" 3l~5i "-O).Q ~a,~ ~~ Q~ C\!~~- ,....C\ll()~ ,....C\lvX (ou,<OCo ~ ~ ~...- Ul Q; Ul UlO CDe;g~ SOlo- ! coco......~<o x x x x x <0 (0 <0 <0 Co ~ ~ T"""...... ~ <01' C\lC\l tOO)O,....C\lMvl()<OI'tOO)O,....C\lMVI()<OI'tOO)O,....C\lMVI()<OI' C\lC\lMMC'lMMMMC'lMC'lvvvvvvvvVVI()I()I()I()I()I()I()I() 8 ci o C\l 0) I() ~~ . ~ 00 00 gg 000 000 LfiMLfi ~~~ g88 C\imm <0 to to C\ll'I' ~~~ I()MM C\l <0 <0 LfiC\iC\i {I)~~ 000 oo~ 0.....:...... I() 0 0 C\l1()1() ~~~ 01'1' 0<0<0 ui""':""; ~~~ 000 I()OO ~LfiLfi C\l<O,.... ~vO) ~~~ I()I()I() I()I()O C\i-=C"i ~~~ 000 I() 0 0 ~ciLfi I() C'l v ,....(00) ~~~ I() 0 I() ,.... ,.... ... MC\iM ~~~ 000 I() 0 0 M C'l LLLLLL .J ..J ..J to 0)0 I()I()<O o o ci o Ll!. ~ 000 ~~~ I() <0"'" C\l0... ~cr)": ,....~..... ~ N fit o o Lfi ~ I() 0 C\l0 C\ici ~o cq, ~ o o Lfi I' Ll!. ~ 88~ ciMN I(),....I' O)C\lN ~rio ~~I' N fit I() C\l Lfi ~ 0)0 ~~ ~ 0) cq, ~ o ~ o Ltl ~ 000 000 ciciai Ovo 00,.... eDNai' ~~CXl N ~ I' "! ~ 00 C\l0 ~g C\!. ,.... ~ o o Lfi I' Ll!. ~ 000 0...10 ciciLfi I()I()O ~,....II) riN' ~N N ~ I() C\l Lfi ~ C\l ~ II) ...0 00 ciM ~ I() cq, th o o Lfi v 0) ~ 000 0011) cicici I() M II) I'C\lN riri..;' ~~v N ~ I() ,.... M ~ I() 0 1'0 cici ~o 0). ~ o o M 0C\l 8 .0 LL .J LLU ..J~ ~ II) I() I() ,.... o ~ ,.... ... C\l <0<0 M <0 I~CJ II) d z .. Gl '\:J '\:J iii '" c t; f! - c ..,0 .0 0- z ~:l ;:2 ~ '\:Jci::: !!::IGl 113:=(1) c o t; ::I .. - l'211l . C o 0 Z 0 :l ;~ .2 '\:J >0 > !!,2; 1D..J(I) N d Z .. Gl '\:J '\:J Cii ... d Z .. Gl '\:J '\:J iii u .5 c o III - ::I C lIi: '\:J .. as ~ u a: u .5 III C o (I) all III Gl '" .- C Gl ::c := (I) u .5 c o n ::I .. - III C o o UI :i o ..J .., (I) c o .. as :i .a ~ '\:J iii ii - o ~ lOOIl) ~:rici 0)'<1'''' C\l......, -=-"':C\i ....,...co C\l C\l '<I' ~~~ Gl U 1: a.. - C :J ]I o ~ 000 ~~~ """"11) COC\l... r-:ciai' CO"" II) ....C\l'<l' ~~...,. Gl U .;: a.. - '2 :J ii - o ~ 000 000 Lriccicoi C\l0l'2 C\l .... l'2 ..,fair; co CO It) ....C\l'<l' ~~...,. Gl U 1: a.. .- C :J ii '0 ~ ,...0,... (")coo) LriLrici 00... COlO... <DNai' C\lC\l'<l' C\lC\l'<l' ~~...,. Gl U ";: a.. - '2 ::l ii - o ~ 000 C!1l)~ c;;ga; 0)C\l... rn..,fai' O)'<I'l'2 ....C\l'<l' ~~...,. Gl U 1: a.. - C :J 5 .- C :J E ~ ~ CD c: en 'ii'j ~:E al ... ~~ ~~'\:J , 1m ....C\lGl :5!~i= 1Da..a..m llliiiiii]l asooo 1D~~~ o Z 000 000 cicici 000 1l)1t)0 f:h4:J7"': ...,. Q) > <( O'\:J .E 5i g:!il -S Q) c'8 lIi:.c "Ecc alll) .cCO oil) oc~ 00 00 cici 00 Il)Il) ffl ffl 000 000 cicici 000 000 ..,..:...:c.; ffl ffl ...,. en .S t5 e 'E o U iii a. '0 "2 ::l :E 00 00 cici 00 qq ~~ 000 000 cicici 000 1l)1l)0 NNui ffl ffl <<It- c: o n 2 ti c: o Ulll rn 0 -g,'~ o Q) ::Jen gg cici 00 Il) Il) NN ffl ffl 000 000 cicici 000 1l)01l) __"NM ffl ffl ...,. o .5 rn c: o en all rn Q)"'z .8'~:E c: al Q) ::l c: J:Oal :E0"E en18~ 00 00 cici 00 1l)0 "":N ffl ffl 000 000 cicici 000 1l)1l)0 uitti.,..: ffl ffl ... ...,. o .5 c: o 13 2 ti g z U :E "!!l ~ '0 ::l (") 5 S"-u .,~....: enooen 00 00 cici 00 Il)Il) ttitti ffl ffl en en ..J..J en rn l!! 'C 'C <( '0 c: al Q) E al Z 5 t5 !!! 'E o U '0 Gl c: C:C Gl al 'ii'j'o u: CD E'lU c ~ CD~ -0 UJ <<i:c 'lUo~ ;:0 __N l'2.l!! .c E ~ 02 5 CD :go~ 5l'; E all'" ... ~::~'~~i . ::.Q E.Q :g "'o~Q)~:D G)U).-cu'-'" 'lUg:5;::5CC E._o.co- SbEt::E.l!! cc~~g~~ ;l; Il) co co c: ,... 0 (") rn ::g::~~~ zco(")Een <9<9.,g:E :Eog~r::'O cD m co u.i CD c: .c en (!) 0 - al C\/ C\/ i!: . 00 ::l>LOll)ala..'O~ ci5~ee:E>iiiO '0 ffiN o CDIl) -'<:1l)1l)C\l jzll)C\l n;:E:gl!3~ (I)-g~~~o '0 ~uiil(")(")~...g '~LO.ar::-r::-E ~oo Q) ~~~~~~~ffi8 5 ~ c:'lU (j) fri 0 ,~ .cLOC\lOiti iXiz~g..o!:!:! ~~**.n~'O ~~""""Q)t5g ""al~~~Q)OO o ra~~.~'e-'O ~ ~enO)O):ED...iiiO C\l LO Q)(") >LO <(LO rn Q) en CCe 00Q) ~~J: ~~~E"C '<I''<I'c:~g C\/ C\/ ~ '(jj 00 Q) LOLOQ)Q)'Oc: ~(])(j)a:iiiO (") ~ 00 C\l o (") co LO n; CD .S a;~7D ~~~ ~rh() It) LO g 'Oc: C\lC\l~alo ~~"'Eoo ?3 ?3 ".: :;:; '0 Q) ~~t5Jjiii8 Qi ~ >. CD >. i:i 6U.mE=E~ .c '01-::1'0 D... Q) OQ) 6, ~~ Ci5 ~g 0013 <( al '0 c: Q) 'C '0 <( ~ 00 LO Il) .... .... o ;: .... c:?OQ lOb City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.d.farrninfton.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator ~ .1. FROM: Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Recreational Vehicle Discussion Workshop DATE: February 4, 2002 INTRODUCTION/DISCUSSION This memo serves as a reminder of the Joint Planning Commission/Council Workshop scheduled for February 20, 2002 at 5:00 PM. The purpose of the workshop is to discuss the control of recreational vehicle parking within residential neighborhoods. ACTION REQUESTED For information only. ;;:;;~ Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator dJO/ J 0 C!.., City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farminlrton.mn.us TO: ~~. Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator FROM: Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Traffic Calming Workshop DATE: February 4,2002 INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION This memo serves as a reminder of the Council Workshop scheduled for February 20,2002 at 7:00 p.m. The purpose of this workshop is to discuss traffic calming methods. BUDGET IMPACT None. ACTION REOUESTED For information only. Respectfully Submitted, 'Ii /J1. ~ Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file ~o;? City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us /od TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ed Shukle City Administrator SUBJECT: City Hall Facility Discussion DATE: February 4, 2002 INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION As part of the agenda for the traffic calming workshop to be held on Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 7 p.m., we are also scheduling some time for a discussion regarding the immediate, short-term and long-term needs of the City Hall facility. The discussion is primarily due to the upcoming departure of the police department to its new facility on 195th Street and Pilot Knob Road. BUDGET IMPACT - None. ACTION REOUESTED - For information only. City Administrator ~CJ3 IrJto CITY OF FARMINGTON SUMMARY OF REVENUES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001 100.00 % Year Complete 2001 PERCENT 2000 PERCENT ITEMS BUDGET CURRENT VTD 2001 VTD 2000 $ $ % $ % GENERAL FUND Property Taxes 1,794,534 872,624 1,783,705 99.40 1 ,594,182 100.44 Licenses/Permits 945,171 126,387 1,150,051 121.68 923,436 118.88 Fines 75,000 7,461 85,568 114.09 79,511 113.59 Intergovernment Revenue 1,131,312 447,162 1 ,183,688 104.63 1,154,773 102.17 Charges for Service 243,100 87,564 209,464 86.16 231,085 83.08 Miscellaneous 230,500 65,318 293,433 127.30 309,830 123.83 Transfers 379,502 35,752 379,502 100.00 192,500 100.00 Total General Fund 4,799,119 1,642,268 5,085,411 105.97 4,485,317 104.67 SPECIAL REVENUE HRA Operating Fund 160,539 2,399 5,632 3.51 62,652 81.37 Police Forfeitures Fund 9,160 93 13,616 148.65 9,630 145.91 Recreation Operating Fund 318,814 37,906 286,734 89.94 124,413 111.43 Park Improvement Fund 177,000 70,262 219,767 124.16 126,744 71.01 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Ice Arena 214,900 46,972 214,253 99.70 208,169 95.18 Liquor Operations 2,356,500 235,951 2,363,349 100.29 2,199,253 104.48 Sewer 1 ,122,250 - 1 ,200,659 106.99 1,075,363 113.20 Solid Waste 1 ,145,000 311,551 1,214,726 106.09 1 ,104,278 108.80 Storm Water 305,000 17,018 201 ,069 65.92 287,492 191.66 Water 1 ,420,000 604,896 1,844,352 129.88 1,511,245 167.92 Total Revenues 9,357,622 2,716,254 10,071 ,534 107.63 7,875,215 101.80 c:?o<! CITY OF FARMINGTON SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001 100.00 % Year Complete 2001 I PERCENT 2000 PERCENT ITEMS BUDGET CURRENT YTD 2001 YTD 2000 GENERAL FUND $ $ $ % $ % Legislative 82,556 4,140 63,240 76.60 59,671 83.80 Administration 286,536 53,892 324,515 113.25 290,051 100.40 Personnel 130,263 14,603 110,281 84.66 86,201 90.00 MIS 42,970 (1,375) 46,3n 107.93 29,575 n.10 Elections 6,n5 2,220 5,896 87.03 16,078 75.06 Communications 57,669 7,070 60,878 105.56 57,848 97.33 Finance 341,658 22,626 342,715 100.31 312,965 99.49 PlanninglZoning 129,571 10,889 133,517 103.05 122,346 101.32 Building Inspection 225,247 19,214 234,917 104.29 218,061 97.62 Community Development 88,933 1,640 81,320 91.44 82,681 99.36 Police Administration 310,805 29,127 302,422 97.30 269,148 100.81 Patrol Services 981,573 93,137 904,891 92.19 807,643 102.39 Investigation Services 81,362 13,140 93,249 114.61 71,896 98.54 Public Safety Programs 61,204 8,487 67,340 110.03 62,189 114.06 Emergency Management 11 ,400 50 17,n8 155.95 295 21.07 Fire 307,5n 106,388 304,634 99.04 253,3n 96.44 Rescue 41 ,248 8,666 42,324 102.61 35,797 101.26 Engineering 239,481 10,396 235,481 98.33 171 ,557 86.65 G.I.S. 13,525 9,268 12,995 96.08 9,942 69.28 Streets 318,163 18,827 306,433 96.31 286,851 100.81 Snow Removal 87,966 8,321 76,073 86.48 67,444 116.00 Signal Maint 86,204 9,976 72,116 83.66 76,248 97.94 Fleet 72,873 8,306 86,160 118.23 56,930 96.85 Park Maint 235,560 18,940 293,795 124.72 226,638 98.35 Tree Maint 66,880 623 29,200 43.66 30,331 85.37 Building Maint 1 03,542 8,130 107,261 103.59 87,885 95.05 Senior Center - 0.00 76,673 95.01 Recreation 151,069 10,197 124,565 82.46 114,187 100.92 Pool - 0 0.00 110,697 99.70 Outdoor Ice 19,909 533 11 ,545 57.99 8,416 60.33 Transfers Out 110,707 3,440 95,696 86.44 20,000 100.00 Total General Fund 4,693,226 500,871 4,587,614 97.75 4,119.621 98.35 SPECIAL REVENUE HRA Operating 73,110 - 40,021 54.74 60,661 76.08 Police Forfeitures Fund 8,355 607 11 ,459 137.15 20,274 148.92 Recreation Operating Fund 246,879 14,320 289,416 117.23 128,n6 115.34 Park Improvement Fund 70,000 - 128,610 183.73 179,137 63.20 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Ice Arena 210,633 25,530 221,738 105.27 210,703 90.10 Liquor Operations 2,251,923 376,074 2,251,109 99.96 2,072,344 104.86 Sewer 986,399 72,416 947,050 96.01 953,896 99.n Solid Waste 1,195,3n 66,852 1,121,723 93.84 882,832 104.64 Storm Water 142,165 15,909 1n,324 124.73 203,2n 579.09 Water Utility 4n,387 38,064 702,222 147.10 554,n9 172.95 Total Expenditures 10,204,934 1,094,128 10,289,503 100.83 9,162,749 101.87 dCJ5 Jan 23 2BB2 14:Bo:48 Via Fax -) 051 403 2591 Administrator Page BB1 Of BB1 Io-F ~ Get the background, resources, and networking opportunities you need to ensure your city's interests are represented during legislative session 2002! LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA C I TIE S 2 0 0 2 Cash & Crisis: Cities' Big News on the Bottom Line The news is clear-Ventura announcements and current events have defined the focus for LMCs 2002 Legislative Conference. Join city officials from across the state on February 28 to learn the latest on what cities can expect regarding today's tax and budget concerns-a nd what you will want to know about keeping your city's systems and citizens safe in this turbulenttime. let your voice be heard during an afternoon with your representatives at the Capitol! Park at LMC, then check in for your Capitol visit at the Conference Concierge desk waiting for you in lMCs Atrium. Intergovernmental Relations staff will have materials and information to point you in the right direction for a great afternoon at the Capitol. ~ PLUS-stop by the LMC Answer Booth and get specific tax a nd budget information for your city! HOW YOU'lL SPEND YOUR DAY: 8:00 Registration 8:30 Welcome Les Heitke, Pre5ident, LMC 8:45 The Big fix: Balancing the Budget on the Backs of Gties Legislative Leadership on the Budget Legislative Leadership on Taxes LegiSlative Leadership on Bonding 10:30 Break 10:45 Homeland Security- Busting the Bad Guys State's Response to Terrorism CrimNet- rectmO/ogy linking publicsafery roc/oserhe gaps 12:00 5...4...3...2...1... Remi Srone prepares us for a (apiro/visirl 12:15 Lunch 1:00 Blosr Off! (heck in af (onference Concierge desk in LMC Arrium L · I · 9 . ......'i............. . . :. : : : :~:{;!~:;~:;; : . . . . . . . . : : : ............1,'.'.'.'................. e I 5 a t I V e... ....,..!;.~-;~.?;.~..~.;.\....... ..... .............""........ .....\..\..\..':.':.'.......',..'.',':,'...'...':. . ..,'..,~..~..'..,w...'.w.~..'...'.......'...\'!...'. ' , , . . . .'.'...'..~;.\'.'..J:.'...':.'.'.~..~..'.',~..',..':.',..'" .. .,.,.,.,."....,.,.,.,.,.,"',.."...,...... ( f ".;...;.;,.;.,:.,.;:,;.,;.;,,;.;;.;.;.;.;.,;.;.;.;:.,;'''';';'. . . 'A'.'''.\".'...':J''.~'.':.'''.':.':.':.':.~'.~'.':.''')''.'''.':.'.... A'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'",'''.~'.'.'.','.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.','.'''.~'.'''.':J:.'.'.o:.':. ..:.':.'...\..':.'.','...':J:.':.':.'.'.....'...'...'...'....:,....'..,:...... W." .,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,......,\......,..., ,.':''',' 'A' ....':.':.....':.':.':.':.\..'....;.':...... O n e re n (';",;,;0' .::~;.\ ~;;:;:..?:;:K::.::;:;;::;::;.:m.}:~Qruary 28,2002 :! . i:::I::Jt:i:td.fur Points Sheraton St. Paul , . ~:::':.;. . A'.'.'.' . .~':-:': . . ~:.:':.. . 'j:.'::' , ~.:','.. . . I :.'''.', ".'".''' ~;.~'. ~'.'''.' ".':.'. .J....,' ..'...o:..'A..':.'..,'.'.'.'....l...'....A........'.....".. ./...'...'...'...'...'..~:.':.'...'.'.':.'...'.'.'...'...'.'.'...'...':.'...'.'.....'...',..'. . ~.,\..',.,',..\.,',.,':.....~..'.......'...'...'...'...'..)...'...'...~..'...'..~...'...'...' . 'J.'.'.'.'.'.\'.'.'.\'.','.'.'.',','.'.','.',','.'.','."..':.'..,'...'..),..........'...'...'. ~..\..'...'...\..'...\'..,..'...'...'.'.'...~..'...'...'...'...'...'...'.......'..,.......',.,' . ..................................,.,............. REGISTRATION FORM Regi strati on fee: $60 Howto register: Register online anytime at www.lmnc.org (online registrations will be billed). Housing:To make reservations for overnightaccommodations, call the Four Points Sheraton at (651) 603-5603, Cancellation Poli<y: All cancellation requests must be in writing and faxed or postmarked by Feb. 21, 2002;cancellations are subject to a $10 handling fee. All unpaid registrations not cancelled seven days prior will be billed at the full conference rate;no refunds will be made. Questions? Call Jodie Tooley (651) 281-1251 or Cathy Dovidio (651) 281-1250. register online anytime:WWW.lmnc.org LMC 2002 Legislative Conference . February 28,2002 . Four Points Sheraton, St. Paul Registration fee: $60 (1-94 at Hamline Avenue) Regimant'sname _________________ Title City YOU serve ___________________ Address CitY __________State ___Zip _______ Telephone number ______ E-mal addres5 _________ Mail this form with payment to: League of Minnesola Cilies, 145 University .I\venue Wesl, St Paul, MN 55103-2044 Fax to: (651) 281-1296 Method of payment: o Check or PO enclosed (make cht<k s payable ra League af Minnesalrl Cities) o Please bill the city o I a 'fea dy reg istered online or via fax and I'm enclosing my payment ..t"'MC . ... ...... . ~ti/N""'- 0tIu 'Ch~-'- dO(;; Ida..-- City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator r, (. FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Consider Resolution - 2002 Seal Coat Project DATE: February 4, 2002 INTRODUCTION Attached is the Feasibility Report for the 2002 Seal Coat Project. The project consists of seal coating specified residential streets. DISCUSSION The 2002 Seal Coat project is the ninth project in the City's seal coat program established by the City of Farmington in 1994. The seal coat program is implemented in a seven-year cycle. The streets indicated in Figure I and Attachment A are to be included in the seal coat program this year. The streets in East Farmington 3rd Addition and East Farmington 4th Addition are to be seal coated for the first time this year. The streets in Hillview Addition, Terra Addition, Dakota County Estates 2nd through 5th Additions, Henderson Addition, 4th Street between Maple Street and C.R. 74, 5th Street between Walnut Street and C.R. 74, 6th Street between Walnut Street and C.R. 74, ih Street between Walnut Street and C.R. 74, Maple Street between 4th Street and 6th Street, Hickory Street between 4th Street and 5th Street, Beech Street between 6th Street and T.H. 3, Locust Street between 5th Street and 6th Street, Hickory Street between 7th Street and T.H. 3, alley by Farmington Lutheran Church located between 5th Street and 6th Street, and the 2nd Street parking lot are scheduled to be seal coated this year. BUDGET IMPACT The 2002 Seal Coat Project is included in the 2002 Capital Improvement Plan. Several streets in the project area have already been assessed seal coating costs through their respective development contracts. The property owners benefiting from the improvements to the remaining streets would be assessed for the project costs pursuant to Minnesota Statute 429 and the City's Special Assessment Policy. The remainder of the costs would be funded through the Road and Bridge Fund. The total estimated project cost for the 2002 Seal Coat project is $101,000. The City's special assessment policy indicates a 50/50 cost sharing split between the City and the benefiting properties for seal coat improvements. The estimated assessment based on the estimated project costs and the City's special assessment policy is $65.41 per residential equivalent unit. do7 ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution receiving the feasibility report, authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications and scheduling a public hearing for March 4, 2002. Respectfully submitted, fkYh~ Lee M. Mann, P .E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file dO'6 RESOLUTION NO. R -02 RECEIVING FEASBILITY REPORT, AUTHORIZING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT 01-02, 2002 SEAL COAT PROJECT Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 4th day of February, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, pursuant to City Council approval of the 2002 Capital hnprovement Plan, the City Engineer has prepared a preliminary report with reference to the following improvement: Proto No. 01-02 DescriDtion Seal coating Location various - see Attachment A ;and, WHEREAS, this report was received by the City Council on February 4th, 2002; and, WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota that: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of improvement of $101,000. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 4th day of March, 2002, in the Council Chambers at Farmington City Hall at 7:00 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. 3. Lee M. Mann is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 4th day of February, 2002. Mayor Attested to the day of ,2002. City Administrator SEAL doer Attachment A Streets 4th Street 5th Street 6th Street 7th Street 9th Street 10th Street Hickory Street Beech Street Maple Street Locust Street 12th Street 13th Street 14th Street Elm Street Oak Street Spruce Street Walnut Street Everest Path Exodus Court Exodus Avenue Everton Court Everton Avenue Exley Avenue Upper 183rd Street West Euclid Street Euclid Way Upper 183rd Street West English Street Embers Avenue 183rd Street West Upper 183rd Street West 184th Street Emerald Circle Emerald Trail Upper 182nd Street West Echo Terrace 180th Street West Elkwood Avenue Ellice Lane Elgin Avenue Echo Drive Location Maple Street to County Road 74 Walnut Street to County Road 74 Walnut Street to County Road 74 Walnut Street to County Road 74 Maple Street to County Road 74 Maple Street to County Road 74 4th Street to Sth Street, 7th Street to T.H. 3, 9th Street to 10th Street 6th Street to T.R. 3 4th Street to 6th Street, T.H. 3 to 11 th Street 5th Street to 6th Street County Road 72 to south phase line of East Farmington 3rd Addition County Road 72 to south phase line of East Farmington 3rd Addition Elm Street to south phase line of East Farmington 3rd Addition 12th Street to 14th Street West phase line of East Farmington 3rd to 14th Street West phase line of East Farmington 3rd to 14th Street West phase line of East Farmington 3rd to 14th Street Upper 183rd Street West to south phase line of Hillview all Upper 183rd Street West to south phase line of Hillview all Upper 183rd Street West to south phase line of Hill view Upper 183rd Street West to north phase line of Hillview Everest Path to east end of road Upper 182nd Street West to south phase line of Terra Euclid Street to Upper 183rd Street West Euclid Street to CSAH 31 Upper 182nd Street West to Upper 183rd Street West Empire Trail to 18Sth Street West English Avenue to east phase line of Dakota County Estates Sth Addition CSAH 31 to east phase line of Dakota County Estates 4th Addition Upper 183rd Street West to Embers Avenue all West phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition to Echo Drive West phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition to east phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition Ellice Lane to Echo Drive West phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition to Echo Drive Upper 182nd Street West to south phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition Upper 182nd Street West to 180th Street West Echo Terrace to north phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition Elgin Avenue to south phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition dlO FEASIBiliTY REPORT FOR PROJECT NO. 02-01 2002 SEAL COAT PROJECT Prepared by: David R. Sanocki, P.E., Engineering Division I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Lee M. Mann, P.E., City Engineer Date: February 4, 2002 Reg. No.: 24541 City of Farmington, Minnesota Engineering Department (651) 463-1600 325 Oak Street dill Table of Contents Introduction.. ......................... ............................................... ................... ........ ............ ....... ....... ... ... 3 Discussion.................................................................................................................... ................... 3 Cost Estimates..... ................... ................. ............. ....... ............ ...................................... ... ... ............ 4 Project Financing... .......................... ............... ................................... ............ ............ ... .................. 5 Conclusions And Recommendations ........ ...................................................................... ................ 6 Attachment A......................................................................................................... ...... ................... 7 Figure 1 - 2002 Seal Coat Areas Figure 2 - Seven Year Cycle Seal Coat Program 2 die:< Introduction This report has been prepared to determine the feasibility of seal coating City streets as planned during 2002. See Figure 1 for the areas to be seal coated in 2002 and Attachment A for a list of the individual streets to be included in this area. The annual seal coating program, approved by Council in 1994, is implemented in a seven year cycle in which assigned areas are seal coated each year (See Figure 2). The City requires new streets to be seal coated approximately two to three years after the final bituminous wear surface has been placed on the street. After the first seal coat application, it is intended that streets would be seal coated every seven years. New streets within developments will continue to be incorporated into the plan as they are added to the City's street system. The purpose of seal coating is to improve the quality and extend the life of the City streets. Seal coating delays the need for costly street reconstruction or other corrective work for which a portion of the costs are assessed to the adjacent property owners. The streets indicated in Figure 1 and Attachment A are to be included in the seal coat program this year. The streets in East Farmington 3rd Addition and East Farmington 4th Addition are to be seal coated for the first time this year. The streets of Hillview Addition, Terra Addition, Dakota County Estates 2nd through 5th Additions, Henderson Addition, 4th Street between Maple Street and County Road 74, 5th Street between Walnut Street and County Road 74, 6th Street between Walnut Street and County Road 74, 7th Street between Walnut Street and County Road 74, Maple Street between 4th Street and 6th Street, Hickory Street between 4th Street and 5th Street, Beech Street between 6th Street and T.H. 3, Locust Street between 5th Street and 6th Street, Hickory Street between ih Street and T.H. 3, alley by Farmington Lutheran Church located between 5th Street and 6th Street, and the 2nd Street parking lot are scheduled to be seal coated this year. It will be specified that the 2002 seal coat project start after Dew Days (June 21 - 23) and be completed before the Dakota County Fair (August 5 -11). Discussion A fine seal coat aggregate (F A - 2 Modified Aggregate) is used in the cul-de-sac areas of the project. Larger aggregate (FA-2 Aggregate) is used on all remaining areas. Staff initiated the use of finer aggregate in the cul-de-sacs in 1997. Finer aggregate tends to bind to the road surface better than larger aggregate, and thus helps prevent separating in areas where there is a higher percentage of vehicles that turn in a circular motion, such as cul-de-sacs. The finer aggregate used in the cul-de-sacs is more costly than the larger aggregate, however, the finer aggregate is only used in the cul-de-sacs and the additional cost to the overall project is not substantial. 3 d/3 Cost Estimates Cost estimates have been prepared for the improvements described in this report. The estimates for the work ~e based on anticipated unit prices for the 2002 construction season. The cost estimates presented below include a ten-percent contingency and twenty-seven percent allowance for engineering, legal and administrative costs. Estimated Project Costs Est. Item Unit Est. Qty Unit Price Bituminous material Gal 36,960 $1.15 FA-2 Aggregate in place Ton 1,805 $15.00 FA-2 Modified Aggregate in place Ton 45 $60.00 Total $42,504 $27,075 $2,700 Estimated Construction Cost $72,279 10% Contingencies $7,228 Total Estimated Construction Cost $79,507 27% Engineering, Legal, Administration $21,467 Total Estimated Project Cost $100,974 4 OI/~ Project Financing The City's Assessment Policy states that Seal Coating shall be assessed at a 50% rate. Based on the project costs identified in this report, the estimated assessment rates for the project, calculated with a 50/50 split, would be $65.41 per unit. The estimated assessment rate in the 2001 feasibility report was $62.25 per unit and the final assessment amount based on the final project costs was $42.56 per unit. Two of the developments, East Farmington 3rd and 4th Additions, that are to be seal coated this year have already collected funds to cover initial seal coating costs through their respective development agreements. Hillview Addition, Terra Addition, Dakota County Estates 2nd through 5th Additions, Henderson Addition, 2nd Street Parking lot, alley near Farmington Lutheran Church, and downtown areas will be assessed for their portion of the costs. Public Streets Assessment based on a rate of $ 65.41/unit Road and Bridge Fund contribution $ 50,500 $ 50.500 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 101,000 5 o?l5' Conclusions And Recommendations The proposed improvements described in this report are feasible from an engineering standpoint and are in accordance with the City's Seal Coating Program. The project is necessary to continue the City's program for street maintenance. The feasibility of the project as a whole is subject to the financial review. The improvements proposed are cost effective based on proven methods for seal coat improvements. Based on the information contained in this report, it is recommended that: 1. The City of Farmington accept this report as a guide for the seal coating improvements in the project area and authorize the preparation of plans and specifications for the project; 2. The City conduct a legal and financial review of the proposed project prior to the public hearing; 3. A Public Hearing be held as required by Minnesota Statue 429. The property owners adjacent to the roadway should be notified for hearing purposes; 4. A neighborhood meeting be scheduled with the affected property owners; S. The following tentative schedule be implemented for the project: Accept Preliminary Report, Authorize Preparation of Plans February 4,2002 and Specifications, Schedule the Public Hearing Hold Neighborhood Meeting Week of February 25, 2002 Hold Public Hearing, Order Project, Authorize March 4, 2002 Advertisement for Bids Receive Bids March 28, 2002 Accept Bids and A ward Contract April 1, 2002 Start Construction July 8, 2002 Complete Construction July 26, 2002 Hold Assessment Hearing September, 2002 6 O?/~ Attachment A Streets 4th Street 5th Street 6th Street ih Street 9th Street 10th Street Hickory Street Beech Street Maple Street Locust Street 1ih Street 13th Street 14th Street Elm Street Oak Street Spruce Street Walnut Street Everest Path Exodus Court Exodus Avenue Everton Court Everton A venue Exley A venue Upper 183rd Street West Euclid Street Euclid Way Upper 183rd Street West English Street Embers Avenue 183rd Street West Upper 183rd Street West 184th Street Emerald Circle Emerald Trail Upper 1 82nd Street West Echo Terrace 180th Street West Elkwood Avenue Ellice Lane Elgin Avenue Echo Drive Location Maple Street to County Road 74 Walnut Street to County Road 74 Walnut Street to County Road 74 Walnut Street to County Road 74 Maple Street to County Road 74 Maple Street to County Road 74 4th Street to 5th Street, 7th Street to T.H. 3, 9th Street to 10th Street 6th Street to T.H. 3 4th Street to 6th Street, T.H. 3 to 11 th Street 5th Street to 6th Street County Road 72 to south phase line of East Farmington 3rd Addition County Road 72 to south phase line of East Farmington 3rd Addition Elm Street to south phase line of East Farmington 3rd Addition lih Street to 14th Street West phase line of East Farmington 3rd to 14th Street West phase line of East Farmington 3rd to 14th Street West phase line of East Farmington 3rd to 141h Street Upper 183rd Street West to south phase line of Hillview all Upper 183rd Street West to south phase line of Hillview all Upper 183rd Street West to south phase line of Hillview Upper 183rd Street West to north phase line of Hillview Everest Path to east end of road Upper 182nd Street West to south phase line of Terra Euclid Street to Upper 183rd Street West Euclid Street to CSAH 31 Upper 1 82nd Street West to Upper 183rd Street West Empire Trail to 1 85th Street West English Avenue to east phase line of Dakota County Estates 5th Addition CSAH 31 to east phase line of Dakota County Estates 4th Addition Upper 183rd Street West to Embers Avenue all West phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition to Echo Drive West phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition to east phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition Ellice Lane to Echo Drive West phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition to Echo Drive Upper 182nd Street West to south phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition Upper 182nd Street West to 1 80th Street West Echo Terrace to north phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition Elgin Avenue to south phase line of Dakota County Estates 2nd Addition 7 d)7 2002 SEAL COAT AREAS CSAH 50 --------._----.-----------~j I I I I : I I r--~-----~-.--.~~--- L CITY or lNC(V\u.( I CHYor H.RMIIfl:;TQN I I ! ! 1 I I I I I I i I i l ~ ~ ~ 1"'""11((1 \IlIl ~ p,;: ,_.. - ~ '''~'. .-. ..... :2l 01 :r.;. I ! I . ,I - ! [UlI("""DIINSHIP FIGURE I ICITY OF FARMINGTONI 500 , " I I ~ - --.. - - --I- - - _ - _ _ _..._ - _ ~ _ _ _ _... , ,. , , o 1000 2000 3000 SCALE ~ ~ 7 YEAR CYCLE SEAL COAT PROGRAM r I I I I I I~ " INDEX AREA 2 - 2002 AREA 3 - 2003 AREA 4 - 2004 AREA 5 - 2005 AREA 6 2006 AREA 7 2007 AREA 1 - 2008 ell' or LM(VILLE ~ ~ PARKING LOTS & ALLEYS ~ ~ 1. 2002-SECOND STREET PARKING LOT 2. 2D02-ALLEY NO. OF FGTN. LUTHERAN 3. 2003-SWIMMING POOL 4. 2D04-RAMBlING RIVER - PINE & ELM ST 5. 2005-ALLEY SO. OF POST OFFICE 6. 2005-ALLEY SO. OF NEW LIBRARY 7. 2005-ALLEY NO. OF VFW 8. 2006-RAMBlING RIVER - BALLFlELDS 9. 2006-ICE ARENA 10. 2006-FIRE STATION 11. 2007-ALLEY SO OF ST. MICHAELS ~ ,_.. -. ~ " -.. ,~" ~... :Lj 1"1"'"' ~ 01 i " ! CSAH 50 tin or r...rUIINGTl:>>i i!~lH SlIl((T ....eST ~ I FIGURE 2 ICITY OF FARMINGTONI 500 , " , , I- - - - 4 ~ - _ _I- - - - - - _ _..._ - - _ _ _ ---i , I, , , o 1 000 2000 3000 SCALE \l ~