HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.21.01 Council Packet
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
May 21, 2001
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVEAGENDA
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments)
a) Mr. David Pritzlaff - Speed Limits
b) Ms. Sherry Jackson - School Zone Signs
c) Ms. Christine Nilson - Drainage Issue
7. CONSENT AGENDA
a) Approve Council Minutes (5/7/01) (Regular) (5/2/01) (Special)
b) School and Conference - Administration
c) Approve Bills
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Consider Resolution - Designating Farmington Heritage Landmark -
Administration
9. A WARD OF CONTRACT
a) Consider Resolution - Cabling Public Facilities Project (Supplemental)
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) Consider Ordinance - Rezone Wilson Property from R-l to R-3 PUD-
Community Development
b) Consider Resolution - Middle Creek 3rd Addition Final Plat - Community
Development
c) Consider Resolution - Bristol Square 1st and 2nd Re-Plat - Community
Development
d) Consider Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Bernard and Molly Murphy
Property - Community Development
e) Consider Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Dave Finnegan Property-
Community Development
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a) Flagstaff Avenue Update - Engineering
12. NEW BUSINESS
a) Consider Resolution - 3rd Street Overlay and Slipline Feasibility Report-
Engineering
Action Taken
Information Received
Information Received
Iriformation Received
Approved
Information Received
Approved
R49-01
Tabled to 6/4/01
Ord 001-464
R50-01
R51-01
Denied
Denied
Tabled
R52-01
b) Set Council Workshop Date/Community Survey - Administration
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
14. ADJOURN
June 4, 2001
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
~CL
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator~
FROM:
Lee M. Mann, P.E.~ Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT:
Citizen Comments - Mr. David Pritzlaff, Akin Road Concerns
DATE:
May 21,2001
INTRODUCTION
At the May 7, 2001 City Council meeting Mr. David Pritzlaff asked questions regarding the Minnesota
Department of Transportation's authority in relation to speed limits and the Akin Road project.
DISCUSSION
The Department of Transportation is the authority that sets speed limits on all public streets in the
State of Minnesota. City streets are public streets and therefore are included under MnDOT's
jurisdiction. Consequently, in the case of Akin Road, which is a public City street, it is not legal for
the City to erect speed limit signs that do not correspond to MnDOT's speed limit determinations that
result from MnDOT's engineering and traffic investigations. The exception to this is that local
authorities may establish a school speed limit within a school zone of a public or nonpublic school
upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation as prescribed by the Commissioner of
Transportation.
BUDGET IMPACT
None.
ACTION REQUESTED
For information only.
Respectfully Submitted,
~/11~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
David Pritzlaff, 20255 Akin Road
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
~b
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator~
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Citizen Comments - Ms. Sherry Jackson, School Zone Signs
DATE: May 21, 2001
INTRODUCTION
At the May 7, 2001 City Council meeting Ms. Sherry Jackson asked if a school speed zone could be
established for Akin Elementary on Akin Road.
DISCUSSION
State statute indicates that local authorities may establish a school speed limit within a school zone of
a public or nonpublic schooL upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation as prescribed
by the Commissioner of Transportation. As a part of the on-going: traffic studies for Akin Road~ '
staff will request that the City's traffic engineer prepare. a memo outlining his recommendations
regarding this issue for the next Council meeting.
BUDGET IMPACT
Consultant staff time to prepare a recommendation memo.
ACTION REQUESTED
For information only.
Respectfully Submitted,
~>>r~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
Sherry Jackson, 5215 W. I 94th Street
Shelly Johnson, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates
7~
COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR
May 7, 2001
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Ristow led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Also Present:
Ristow, Cordes, Soderberg, Strachan
Verch
Acting City Attorney Brokl, Interim City Administrator Roland,
City Management Team
4. APPROVE A GENDA
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a) Proclaim National Emergency Medical Services Week, May 20-26, 2001
MOTION by Strachan, second by Soderberg proclaiming May 20-26, 2001 as
Emergency Medical Services Week. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
b) Proclaim Heritage Preservation Week, May 13-19,2001
MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg proclaiming May 13-19,2001 as
Historic Preservation Week. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS
a) Mr. Ryan Bernhagen, Skatepark Request
Mr. Bernhagen had expressed concerns over the lack of skateboard facilities in
Farmington. Staff sent him a response stating due to financial considerations, the
construction of a skatepark has to be delayed until a favorable referendum for an
athletic complex or facility can be held.
b) Mr. David PritzlatT, Akin Road Concerns
At the April 16, 2001 Council Meeting, Mr. Pritzlaffforwarded questions and
concerns regarding the Pine Knoll project, the Akin Road project and street
construction financing alternatives.
Mr. David Pritzlaff, 20255 Akin Road, stated he received a letter from the City
and he had two points he wanted to clarify. The first point was regarding the Pine
Knoll project, he said he does not recall being told the County declined being
involved with the cost of redoing the culverts and that residents were not assessed
Council Minutes (Regular)
May 7, 2001
Page 2
for the culverts. He is more concerned about getting the Akin Road project done
better than the Pine Knoll project was done.
The second point was that he requested a safe way be provided for Akin Road
residents to get to the proposed bike path. Mr. Pritzlaff stated at the previous
meeting, a representative from MnDOT echoed a statement that has been said
very often. Mr. Pritzlaff stated he would like to ask Police Chief Siebenaler when
people are stopped for speeding, if a fair amount of drivers have an excuse for
speeding. He said it has been stated that if stop signs are installed that are not
warranted, people have a tendency to go through them. Do the Police get the
excuse from drivers that they did not think it was a warranted stop sign so they
went through it? Mr. Pritzlaff stated he thinks any stop sign is warranted. If there
is a stop sign you stop. He said the letter stated crosswalks can be striped at
intersections. He wants to know are there going to be crosswalks striped on Akin
Road? When approaching a school there are school zone signs to make people
pay attention. If a crosswalk and a stop sign are at those intersections, maybe
install a sign before that saying crosswalk ahead. Mr. Pritzlaff stated the letter
says marking a crosswalk does not guarantee people will use it. He feels it is up
to the parents to educate their children how to use crosswalks. Pedestrians do
have the right-of-way.
If residents are assessed, they should have a say in the design. Residents had
some say at neighborhood meetings. Now there is some fine tuning that needs to
be done. Mr. Pritzlaff said the letter stated the City does not have the authority to
set speed limits on Akin Road. Does MnDOT regulate the speed on all roads in
the City? Councilmember Soderberg said the state sets the speed limit in the
entire state. Councilmember Strachan stated they are trying to balance safety.
Minnesota has a crosswalk law, stating traffic should stop for pedestrians in the
crosswalk, but does everyone know that? Mr. Pritzlaff stated he does not want a
crosswalk in the middle of the road without other means of safety.
Ms. Sherry Jackson, 5215 West 194th Street, asked why there are no signs in front
of Akin Road Elementary School like in front of the other schools saying 20 mph
during school. Staff will respond.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Interim City Administrator Roland stated on the List of Bills there is a notation for
Empire Township being paid $540 for solid waste. That is a keypunch error and is for
sewer fees for residents on 209th Street recently annexed into the City.
Councilmember Soderberg pulled item 7b) Approve Traffic Control Plan - East
Farmington for discussion. City Engineer Mann stated the stop sign on Locust and 14th
Street is an existing stop sign installed by the developer. Placement is not contrary to the
right-of-way. It does not have to be there, however traffic is used to stopping. The yield
signs at 10th and Walnut and 10th and Locust were brought to staffs attention by
residents. There were concerns about which traffic had the right-of-way. The Traffic
Council Minutes (Regular)
May 7, 2001
Page 3
Engineer recommended yield signs were appropriate. A stop sign will be added at Larch
and 11 th Street. This will be installed by the developer as it was on their plans. A stop
sign at 13th and Maple will be removed as it was not in the plans and there are no
conflicts at the intersection. A 2-way stop control is a right-of-way issue. Warrants deal
with 4-way stop control. MOTION by Strachan, second by Cordes approving the
control plan for East Farmington. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Strachan to approve the Consent Agenda as follows:
a) Approved Council Minutes (4/16/01) (Regular)
c) Accepted Donation - Senior Center - Parks and Recreation
d) Received Information Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation
e) Received Information Capital Outlay - Police
f) Received Information Capital Outlay - Police
g) Received Information Capital Outlay - Public Works
h) Received Information Capital Outlay - Solid Waste
i) Adopted RESOLUTION R43-01 Accepting Donations Senior Center - Parks
and Recreation
j) Adopted RESOLUTION R44-01 River Erosion Control Grant - Parks and
Recreation
k) Received Information School and Conference - Community Development
I) Received Information School and Conference - Liquor Operations
m) Set Public Hearing May 21, 2001 Farmington Heritage Landmark Designation-
Administration
n) Approved Bills
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Approve Therapeutic Massage License - Administration
Ms. Sherry Jackson has submitted an application for a Therapeutic Massage
License. The business will be located at 18598 Elk River Trail. The required
attachments, fees and insurance information have been submitted with the
application. Police Chief Siebenaler has reviewed the forms and approved the
applications. MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg to close the Public
Hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Soderberg, second by
Cordes approving a Therapeutic Massage License for Sherry Jackson, 18598 Elk
River Trail. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTSAND COMMUNICATIONS
a) Consider Resolution - Charleswood 5th Addition Final Plat - Community
Development
Newland Communities is seeking Final Plat approval for the 5th Addition of
Charleswood. The plat consists of 96 townhome units on 21 acres of land located
south and east of the existing single-family development and west of Pilot Knob
Road. The developer is proposing a single lot for each 4-unit building foo~rint.
Council Minutes (Regular)
May 7, 2001
Page 4
There will be 10 additional off-street parking stalls in each of the private
driveways as requested during the preliminary plat. An 8-foot bike path is
proposed along the north half of 200th Street W beginning at Pilot Knob Road and
will head west toward Charleswood 4th Addition. Wetlands are located to the
north and south of the plat with a small portion of a wetland being effected during
the construction of 200th Street. A small appendage of a wetland extends
southward and will be crossed by 200th Street W. The developer is proposing
boulevard trees at 40- foot spacing along 200th Street except for several small
sections near the southern mitigated wetland, just entering 200th Street off of Pilot
Knob Road. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Strachan adopting
RESOLUTION R45-01 approving the Charleswood 5th Addition Final Plat
contingent upon any Engineering comments and the execution of a Development
Contract. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
b) Consider Resolution - Autumn Glen 3rd Addition Final Plat - Community
Development
Arcon Development Inc has submitted the Final Plat for Autumn Glen 3rd
Addition. The plat contains 59 single-family lots on approximately 48.28 acres of
land south of the existing Autumn Glen 2nd Addition, east of Limerock Ridge and
north of the proposed 195th Street right-of-way. The property is zoned R-l single-
family residential. The proposed overall development for Autumn Glen will
consist of 153 single-family lots. Approximately 35.6 acres on the east side of the
development will be dedicated adjacent to the existing 52 acre City parkland,
creating an 88 acre park and open space. Embers Avenue will extend south to the
proposed 195th Street and Elkridge Trail will intersect with Embers Avenue. The
report proposes that 195th Street would be extended to the east from Akin Road to
a point approximately 2500 feet. Participation in the cost of 195th Street is a
condition of the Autumn Glen development. A sidewalk/trail will be required
along the east side of Embers Avenue and is proposed along the north side of the
future 195th Street. Trails are also proposed throughout the City's parkland
property east of Outlot A. The Parkland east of the Autumn Glen development
and Outlot A is currently owned by the City and was dedicated by John Malinski
to meet parkland fee requirements for this development. The Developer proposes
to dedicate the entire 16.72 acres of Outlot A to the City for additional parkland
acreage. The engineering division requires that a 20-foot wide easement be
provided between Lots 14 and 15, Block 1, with 10 feet on each side of the
centerline ofthe storm pipe. Mr. Larry Frank, Arcon Development, stated there
will be burming and extra landscaping along 195th Street. MOTION by Cordes,
second by Soderberg adopting RESOLUTION R46-01 approving the Autumn
Glen 3rd Addition Final Plat contingent upon the above Engineering comments
and the execution ofa Development Contract. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
c) Consider Resolution - Charleswood 4th Addition Development Contract-
Engineering
The Development Contract for Charleswood 4th was presented to Council.
Conditions for approval include:
Council Minutes (Regular)
May 7, 2001
Page 5
a)
b)
The Developer enter into this Agreement.
The Developer provide the necessary security in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement.
The Developer reserves Lot 19, Block 1 for purchase by the Water Board
for a future water supply well. The Water Board has agreed to purchase
said lot from the Developer for a total amount of $43,000.
The Developer will deed or dedicate to the City public road access to the
Nordseth property on and across Lot 14, Block 1, until such time as 200th
Street or alternate permanent access is provided to the Nordseth property
eliminating the need for access to the Nordseth property through the
Charleswood 4th plat, and at that time the City shall re-convey, vacate or
otherwise release its interest in Lot 14, Block 1 to the Developer.
The Developer record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of
Titles within 75 days after the City Council approves the final plat.
c)
d)
e)
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes adopting RESOLUTION R47-01
approving the execution of the Charleswood 4th Addition Development Contract
and authorizing its signing contingent upon the above conditions and approval by
the Engineering Division. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
d) Consider Resolution - Middle Creek 2nd Addition Development Contract -
Engineering
The Development Contract for Middle Creek 2nd was presented to Council.
Conditions of approval are:
a) The Developer enter into this Agreement.
b) The Developer provide the necessary security in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement.
c) The Developer record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of
Titles within 75 days after the City Council approves the final plat.
MOTION by Cordes, second by Strachan adopting RESOLUTION R48-01
approving the execution of the Middle Creek 2nd Development Contract and
authorize its signing contingent upon the above conditions and approval by the
Engineering Division. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
e) Approve Traffic Control- Various Intersections - Engineering
Staff has received requests from residents to install stop signs at various
intersections. The City Traffic Engineer has performed an intersection review at
each of these intersections. His recommendations are as follows:
183rd Street and Echo Drive - 2-way stop sign control is recommended on
Echo Drive at 183rd Street
Embers Avenue and Empire Trail - 2-way stop sign control is recommended
on Empire Trail at Embers Avenue
Oak Street and Fifth Street - 2-way stop sign control is recommended on Fifth
Street at Oak Street
Council Minutes (Regular)
May 7~ 2001
Page 6
Oak Street and First Street - 2-way stop sign control is recommended on Oak
Street at First Street
These intersections meet warrants for the placement of 2-way stop control.
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes approving the installation of
permanent 2-way stop control at the above intersections. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a) Ratify Actions Authorizing Sale of Bonds - Finance (Supplemental)
At the April 16, 2001 meeting, the Council gave preliminary approval to the
issuance of bonds subject to maximum interest rate caps. This action gave
preliminary approval to the resolutions related to each bond issue. The sales have
been completed under the cap limitations, and the Council was requested to ratify
and adopt the resolutions in their final form. Resolution 40-01 approves the
issuance of$I,645,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2001B.
The true interest cost on these bonds upon final sale was 5.04%. Resolution 41-
01 approves the issuance of $870,000 General Obligation Permanent
Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2001 C. The true interest cost on
these bonds upon final sale was 4.52%. Resolution 42-01 approves the execution
of a ground lease and a lease agreement providing for the construction of a
Central Maintenance Facility and Police Station to be leased from the HRA by the
City. The trust interest cost on these bonds upon final sale was 5.17%. The HRA
will be adopting the final resolution for the Public Project Revenue Bonds at their
May 14,2001 meeting. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes adopting the
resolutions establishing the final terms of the bonds and the execution of the
ground lease and lease agreement with the HRA. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
12. NEW BUSINESS
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
Council member Cordes: Received an invitation from the Met Council regarding a
presentation on the Empire/Rosemount master plan.
Interim City Administrator Roland: A groundbreaking ceremony has been proposed for
the Police and Central Maintenance Facilities on May 14,2001 at 5 p.m. at the public
facilities site. The HRA, Task Force, Council, Water Board and Chamber of Commerce
are invited. A League of Minnesota Cities Conference will be held the 3rd week of June
in Duluth.
Community Development
Director Olson: The first meeting of the MUSA Review Committee has
been scheduled for May 16, 2001. Representatives from the Council, Planning
Commission, School Board and staff will attend.
Council Minutes (Regular)
May 7, 2001
Page 7
Parks and Recreation
Director Bell: The City had a larger response than expected for Clean-up
Day. The Saturday route was finished Monday.
City Engineer Mann: The Department of Transportation has informed staff they
will be replacing the bridge on Hwy 3 north of CR 66 in 2002. Staff met with MnDOT
last week regarding the design and detour routes.
Mayor Ristow: He received a request to reverse stop signs on 187th and
189th Streets in Prairie Creek.
He also received a request from Mr. Dave Peters for sod replacement. The City provides
sod for damage caused by snow plows, but it is up to the homeowners to replace the sod.
Mr. Peters felt whoever damages the sod should replace it. It is hard for the elderly and
handicapped to remove the debris and do the work.
At the last School Board meeting there were some issues raised by Empire Township
residents that need to be addressed. Mayor Ristow and Interim City Administrator
Roland asked for Council consensus for them to attend the May 14,2001 School Board
meeting.
He received a request for a Tree Preservation Ordinance. Community Development
Director Olson stated it will be discussed and brought to the Planning Commission and
Council with the Zoning Code Update. This will be within the next 30-60 days. A
Public Hearing will be held on the complete ordinance update.
Friday was Arbor Day at the park and thanked Parks and Recreation Director Bell and
staff for attending. Fourth graders also attended.
14. ADJOURN
MOTION by Cordes, second by Strachan to adjourn at 8:35 p.m. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
~ /Y7~~
c//
Cynthia Muller
Executive Assistant
JOINT COUNCIL WORKSHOP
FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL AND EUREKA TOWN BOARD
City Hall Conference Room
May 2, 2001
Council Members in attendance: Mayor Ristow, Council Members Cordes (left 8:00 p.m.),
Soderberg, Strachan, and Verch (left 8:13 p.m.),
Members absent: None
Eureka Town Board Members in attendance: Board Chair Topp, Members Anderson, Miller,
Pflaum, and Smith.
Others present: Interim City Administrator Roland, Community Development Director Olson and
Planning Coordinator Smick, Mr. and Mrs. William Adelmann were also in attendance.
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Introductions were made between the Council
and the Town Board.
Dave Olson discussed the City's Comprehensive Plan, current and future MUSA availability and
staging plans and the status of the City's zoning ordinance revision. Specific attention was given
to the Adelmann property currently being considered for annexation into the City. Mr. Olson
described the statutory request and approval process and responses available to the City and
Township.
Township Board members asked if MUSA would be stretched (extended) to include the
Adelmann property. Olson described the MUSA designation process and criteria. It was
discussed that the Farmington Comprehensive Plan outlined a primary goal as the "filling in" of
the central part of the City and that the Adelmann parcel did not fit that goal.
Township board members expressed concern that the Adelmann parcel would become the first of
a "domino effect" of properties being annexed into the City. They emphasized that their desire
was to keep the township rural. But said that they understood Mr. Adelmann's right to do what
was best for himself with regard to his property.
Discussion of a future meeting between the City and Township and their respective attorneys was
brought forth. Such a meeting would be to plan for the area and future "orderly growth". Items for
consideration to a potential agreement would include identification of specific triggers for
annexation, an agreement on basic tenants, and a memorandum of understanding.
Regarding the annexation petition of Mr. Adelmann, the board agreed to meet separately and
decide on their response (whether to submit an objection or not) and to advise the City by June
1st.
Meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
;;z;;;;
Robin Roland
Interim City Administrator
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
II
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and Interim City Administrator ~
FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR
SUBJECT: School and Conference - Administration Department
DATE: May 21, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Attendance at the International Personnel Management Association (IPMA) Regional
Conference scheduled for June 4th - June 6th in Bloomington, MN is being planned.
DISCUSSION
The IPMA conference provides Human Resource professionals the opportunity to attend
seminars on the latest developments and programs in human resources. The conference is
designed to increase the skills and knowledge of the participants as well as introduce new trends
within the field. It is also an opportunity for attendees to participate in peer discussions about the
challenges public employers face when dealing with a wide range of complex Human Resource
issues.
BUDGET IMPACT
The cost of attendance is provided for in the 2001 budget.
ACTION REOUESTED
For information only.
Respectfully submitted,
Af!A_4;t{:;/~
!;renda Wendlandt, SPHR
Human Resources Manager
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
cgQJ
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and Interim City Administrator ~
FROM: Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution - Designating Farmington Heritage Landmark
DATE: May 21, 2001
INTRODUCTION
The City Council may designate individual historic buildings and sites as Farmington Heritage
Landmarks.
DISCUSSION
The Heritage Preservation Commission has determined that the Historic Fletcher Building, 345
Third Street, meets the eligibility criteria for designation as a Farmington Heritage Landmark
under City Code 2-11-4(A). The HPC has submitted documentation supporting Heritage
Landmark designation of the Fletcher Building in a report prepared by Robert Vogel dated July
31, 2000. The Minnesota Historical Society has also commented favorably on the proposed
landmark designation.
BUDGET IMPACT
None.
ACTION REOUESTED
Adopt a resolution designating the Fletcher Building~ 345 Third Street, as a Farmington Heritage
Landmark, and noting the Fletcher Building as a heritage landmark on the Official City Zoning
Map.
Respectfully submitted,
t''-CLu-- ~~.
Karen Finstuen
Administrative Services Manager
cc: Tom Quam
RESOLUTION NO. R_-Ol
DESIGNATING THE FLETCHER BUILDING
345 THIRD STREET
AS A FARMINGTON HERITAGE LANDMARK
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof~ a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
F armington, Minnesota~ was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 st day of May
2001 at 7 :00 p.m.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following:
WHEREAS, the Farmington City Council has declared as a matter of public policy that the
preservation, protection, perpetuation, and use of significant historic buildings is a matter of
public necessity; and,
WHEREAS, the Heritage Preservation Commission has determined that the Historic Fletcher
Building, 345 Third Street, meets the eligibility criteria for designation as a Farmington Heritage
Landmark under City Code 2-11-4(A); and,
WHEREAS, the Heritage Preservation Commission has submitted documentation supporting
Heritage Landmark designation of the Fletcher Building in a report prepared by Robert C. Vogel,
Preservation Planning Consultant, dated July 31, 2000; and~
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Historical Society has commented favorably on the proposed
landmark designation; and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed landmark designation was held in the City
Council Chambers in City Hall on May 21, 2001.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The Historic Fletcher Building~ 345 Third Street is designated as a Farmington Heritage
Landmark.
2. The Fletcher Building will be noted as a heritage landmark on the Official City Zoning
Map.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the
21 st day of May 2001.
Mayor
Attested to the
day of
2001.
Interim City Administrator
SEAL
Karen Finstuen
:rom:
Jent:
To:
Subject:
Mike Schultz
Tuesday, May 01, 2001 2:31 PM
Karen Finstuen
RE: Fletcher Block Building
Karen,
There are only two adjacent property owners, they are
Stanley & Marilyn Overby (They own the property to the north - 341)
9950 194th Street W
Lakeville, MN 55044-8915
and
Patricia Darflinger (She owns 309 Oak Street to the east)
10310 Upper 196th Way W
Lakeville, MN 55044-8943
Do you need the owners and addresses across the street?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Karen Finstuen
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Mike Schultz
Subject: Fletcher Block Building
Mike: The address of this building is 345 3rd Street and PIN # 14-77000-081-23. I need the mailing addresses for the
adjacent property owners. Thank you.
Karen Finstllen
Administrative Services Managel-
City of Farmington
651-463-1802
kfinstuen@ci.farmington.mn.us
~ ~.J ?"'-~~ ad.-'J ~
(/ II. r7~.~
1
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
7m
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, Interim City Administrator ~
FROM: Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager
SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing - Farmington Heritage Landmark Designation
DATE: May 7, 2001
INTRODUCTION
A public hearing is required for the designation of a Farmington Heritage Landmark site.
DISCUSSION
At the City Council meeting of May 15,2000 the Heritage Preservation Commission requested
approval to begin the process of designating property as Heritage Landmark Sites. Four
buildings were declared significant and worth preserving and protecting under the laws of the
City of Farmington. The Heritage Preservation Commission has determined that the Historic
Fletcher Building, 345 Third Street, meets the eligibility criteria for designation as a Farmington
Heritage Landmark and requests a public hearing be held to finalize this designation.
Notification of the public hearing will be sent to all adjacent properties and Robert Vogel, HPC
Consultant, will be present at the hearing to address any questions.
ACTION REQUIRED
Set a public hearing for 7:00 p.m., May 21, 2001, to designate the Fletcher Building as a
Farmington Heritage Landmark.
Respectfully submitted,
~ff~
Karen Finstuen
Administrative Services Manager
Cc: Thomas Quam, Property Owner
HPC Members
Robert Vogel
, ,
CITY OF FARMINGTON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of
Farmington, Dakota County, Minnesota on the 21 st day of May, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall, 325 Oak Street, Farmington, Minnesota to consider designating the
Fletcher Building, 345 Third Street, as a Farmington Heritage Landmark.
All persons desiring to be heard, in person or in writing~ will be heard at this time. If you have
any questions prior to the meeting, please contact Karen Finstuen at 651-463-1802.
IS/: Robin Roland
Interim City Administrator
(/uPJ~~~2~,~~df4"~~ ~~/,
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor & Councilmembers
FROM: Robin Roland, Interim City Administrator
SUBJECT~ Supplemental Agenda
DATE: May 21, 2001
It is requested that the May 21, 2001 agenda be amended as follows:
A WARD OF CONTRACT
9 (a) Consider Resolution - Cabling Public Facilities Project
Bids have been received for the voice/dataJpaging/CATV cabling of the Public
Facilities Project. The low bidder is Corporate Technologies of New Hope at $37,700.
Respectfully submitted,
;1/4/
Robin Roland
Interim City Administrator
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
r~
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers
FROM:
Robin Roland, Interim City Administrator
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Consider Resolution - Cabling Public Facilities Project
May 21,2001
INTRODUCTION
Bids have been received for the voice/data/paging/CATV cabling of the Public Facilities Project.
DISCUSSION
The technology component of the public facilities project requires cabling for voice/data/paging
and CATV capabilities. LOGIS, the City's consultant on technology, prepared bid specifications
as part of the project development and advertised for bids. Bids were opened on May 3, 2001 at
LOGIS and have been analyzed by Kevin Pikkaraine for completeness.
Seven bids were received, ranging from $37,700 to $64,990 for the cabling. A listing of the bids is
attached with this memo. The apparent low bidder is Corporate Technologies of New Hope at
$37,700.
BUDGET IMPACT
The technology budget (including all facets of data, voice and cable) for the Public Facilities
Project is $91,710.
ACTION REQUIRED
Adopt the attached resolution awarding the Public Facilities Cabling bid to Corporate
Technologies at a cost of $37,700.
;z;j(:;'
Robin Roland
Interim City Administrator
City of Farmington Bid Results
Vendor Standard Additional References:
Bid $: Connections
$:
Corporate Technologies $37,700 5,825 Cost of adds of
9449 Science Center Dr voice-data $125
New Hope, MN. 55428 State License:
(763) 504-3000 CCOO 182
Grea Kuhl
Structured Cabling Sys $39,298 $2,580 Cost of adds of
701 West Hoffman St voice-data $150
Cannon Falls, MN 55009
Christina M. Henry
(507) 263-0518
TelTronix $45,322. 3,650. Cost of adds of
1230 Eagan Industrial Rd voice $100, data
Suite 120 $110
Eagan, MN. 55121 State license
(651) 452-3500 cc00697.
Scott Doran
Structured Network Solution $50,410 $3,900 Cost of adds
632 Mendelssohn Ave N voice-data $115.
Golden Valley, MN. 55427 Provides cabling
(763) 545-1116 for many LOGIS
Lew Jurgens members.
State cc01125
T elesystems Inc. $51,400 4,505 Cost of adds of
14420 21st Ave N voice -data $65
Plymouth, MN. 55447 State license
Vance Treska cc0696
Parsons (AUS) $53,500 .3,250 Cost of adds of
5960 Main Street NE voice-data $145.
Minneapolis, MN.55432 Provides cabling
(763) 571-8000 for many LOGIS
Mick Krause cities. Ca01404
Metro Electronics Lifestyle $64,990 $10,580 Cost of adds of
19050 Industrial Blvd NW voice-data $120.
Suite 2 State License
Elk River, MN. 55330 cc01141
Benito VasQuez
RESOLUTION NO. R -01
AWARD BID
VOICE/DATA/PAGING/CATV CABLING
POLICE AND CENTRAL MAINTENANCE FACILITIES PROJECT
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21st day of
May, 2001 at 7:00 p.m.
Members present:
Members absent:
Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution:
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Cabling (voice/data/paging/CATV)
of the Public Facilities project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and
the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Contractor
Corporate Technologies
Structured Cabling Systems
TelTronix
Structured Network Solution
Telesystems Inc.
Parsons (AUS)
Metro Electronics Lifestyle
;and,
Total Base
Bid
$37,700
$39,298
$45,322
$50,410
$51,400
$53,500
$64,990
WHEREAS, it appears the fIrm of Corporate Technologies, Inc. is the lowest responsible
bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The bid for V oice/Data/Paging/CA TV Cabling City of Farmington Police and Central
Maintenance Facilities of Corporate Technologies USA, Inc., a Minnesota corporation,
for $37,700.00 is hereby accepted and awarded and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into a contract therefore.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on
the 21st day of May, 200 1.
Attested to the
SEAL
Mayor
day of May, 2001.
City Administrator
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/O~
TO:
Mayor, Council Members, m /
Interim City Administrator W
Lee Smick, AICP (} ,~
Planning Coordinator Y
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Consider Ordinance - Rezone Wilson Property from R-l to R-3 PUD
DATE:
May 21, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Steve and Nancy Wilson, 5200 203rd Street West, Farmington, Minnesota have submitted a petition to rezone
their property from R-l (Low Density-Residential) to R-3 PUD (High Density Residential Planned Unit
Development). The property consists of 4 acres and is located in the central portion of the Middle Creek
development.
DISCUSSION
The owners of the property, Steve and Nancy Wilson, are seeking to rezone their 4-acre property from R-l to
R-3 PUD. The proposed development consists of 9 single-family lots on a cul-de-sac eventually to be
connected to 203r Street.
The Wilson property was originally left out of the Middle Creek Schematic PUD because the Wilson's had not
determined if they were interested in selling their property at the time of the original PUD approval. The
property surrounding the 4-acres owned by the Wilson's was rezoned to R-3 PUD on February 7,2000.
The Wilson's are now seeking to rezone their property from R-l to R-3 PUD to conform to the surrounding
zoning of the Middle Creek development.
2020 Comprehensive Plan
The 2020 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Wilson property is proposed for low density residential (see
attached). Since the proposed single-family residential development for the Wilson property complies with the
2020 Comprehensive Plan, no Comprehensive Plan amendment is required for the property.
Transportation
The preliminary plan shows 9 lots arranged around a cul-de-sac that will eventually connect to the proposed
203rd Street east/west minor collector. The cul-de-sac roadway width is proposed at 28 feet measured from
face of curb to face of curb. The proposed road layout follows the plans approved in the Middle Creek
Preliminary Plat.
A sidewalk is required along one side of the 28-foot wide street within the proposed development.
Planning Commission
The Planning Commission met on May 8, 200 I and approved the Wilson Property rezone.
ACTION REQUESTED
Consider the attached ordinance to rezone the Wilson Property from R-l (Low Density-Residential) to R-3
PUD (High Density Residential Planned Unit Development).
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Lee Smick, AICP
Planning Coordinator
cc: Steve and Nancy Wilson
Larry Frank, Arcon Development, Inc.
Don Patton, D R Horton
File
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE FARMINGTON
CITY CODE, THE FARMINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE,
REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Section 1O-2-8(B) of the Farmington City Code is amended by adding a new
subsection rezoning the property legally described on the attached Exhibit A from R-1 (Low
Density) to R-3 PUD, consistent with the Middle Creek property previously rezoned pursuant to
Ordinance No. 000-448, as codified at Section 10-2-8 (B) ofthe Farmington City Code.
SECTION 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Farmington, adopted under Section 10-2-1
of the Farmington City Code, shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the City
Planner shall appropriately mark the Zoning Map on file in the City Hall for the purposes of
indicating the rezoning provided for in this ordinance.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
ADOPTED this 21 st day of May, 2001, by the City Council of the City of Farmington.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Gerald Ristow, Mayor
ATTEST:
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of the South 140 acres of the Northwest Quarter of
Section 25, Township 114, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota
described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of
the Northwest Quarter of said Section 25; thence along the
east line of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 1518.50
feet; thence westerly at a deflection angle to the right of 86
degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 55.65 feet; thence
northwesterly at a deflection angle to the right of 29 degrees
15 minutes a distance of 478.10 feet; thence westerly at a
deflection angle to the left of 24 degrees 15 minutes a
distance of 638.50 feet to the actual point of beginning;
thence southerly at a deflection angle to the left of 90
degrees a distance of 315.00 feet; thence westerly at a
deflection angle to the right of 90 degrees a distance of
375.00 feet; thence northerly at a deflection angle to the
right of 90 degrees a distance of 465.00 feet; thence easterly
at a deflection angle to the right of 90 degrees a distance of
375.00 feet; thence southerly at a deflection angle to the
right of 90 degrees a distance of 150.00 feet to the point of
beginning, according to the United States Government Survey
thereof and situate in Dakota County, Minnesota.
Location Map
Wilson Property Rezone
BIrR T17TITR\m -\ 11 Ft ~ ~ JlT\CY N
\ \ ~11 :t +E
IT I mfifnll ~~~ w
;J eiY\:J
\ N \/1" s
==
IIIIIIIIIIIILO~ \'
- ~I~ City
c Facility
Site
F~\~" 1\ ~
~~
~TD~ DJ\ ~
g;~\ ::c "':c\\ I
(' H
~ \\\ \
-......!', l~~
..---/ -;;:;
~ Cl
c::: ~
C\i
'\ 1:
!:: ~
- \" \\
l ~q.m
-:::J ::T\ >1:'11---. ~
Subject Property
~ \. \. \.
// - ~ --Y'
~ ) ~~
-~
f-- -
I-- - ~
I :::::; --- - - I
J - - Ii
I - - ~
J I --I l
~
IUJ l_ IL -1 ~
~. ~ --
"'",....
/
I
o
.0
iO
~
--
--------
------
...
C/)
.......
()
'C ~
t)t
o~
0)0
c '-
. - a...
c c
o 0
NC/)
c
2S
O)~
c 0
E c
'- 0
00.......
LLoo
~()
o 0
~...J
.......
o
'"
z.~
r~.-" ._~-
I
I
I
I
;;;
ro ]3
.u E
Q; 0-
wE? ~
2:~ E ~ ~
<D(J)(/)_O ~ Q)
~U);G~U 0.._0.~
,-~C<D-o'2 _"0-::: U)_
~ ~.~.~coo <Do.~c~c~-
~. ~<D~~'~o~_rng~~~<D~~
~~ ~~~~~€rn~.~~~"C~oco
003 33"C~~E~~~~~~<DE~U
~o(/)uu2Q)>~U)-o"cQ)-ca.~ -0
~m~.~.~.~~~.~ggg~~~~i~.~
~<~<<~aIzu~~a9_~2I2
c~6~~~~~~~~~~~Q~~~~
G2rn~~mmmmu~~~~~~~~~
<~DIDII~IIDDIIDD~~
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
lOb
TO:
Mayor, Council Members, Il'XlI
Interim City Adminis~t[) ~.
Lee Smick, AICP '.F
Planning Coordinator
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Consider Resolution - Middle Creek 3rd Addition Final Plat
DATE:
May 21,2001
INTRODUCTION
Arcon Development, Inc., D. R. Horton, and Steve and Nancy Wilson have submitted the Final Plat for Middle
Creek 3rd Addition. The plat contains 20 single-family lots and 6 outlots on approximately 105.0975 acres of
land south of the Vermillion Grove subdivision, east of the 100-foot wide gas pipeline easement and Middle
Creek 1 st and 2nd Additions, west of the Briesacher property and Pine Knoll Subdivision and north of the
Farmington Industrial Park.
DISCUSSION
The Developer is seeking Final Plat approval of the Middle Creek 3rd Addition which consists of 20 single-
family lots on approximately 105.0975 acres of land. This portion of the development was approved by the
City Council on August 8, 2000 at the Middle Creek Preliminary Plat stage.
Area Summary
The following is a summary of the acreages for each area:
Block 1
Block 2
Block 3
Block 4
Total Lot Area
Total Outlot Area
Total Right-of-Way
Total Area
1.4115 acres
2.6024 acres
1.1347 acres
2.2888 acres
7.4374 acres
97.5323 acres
0.1278 acres
105.0975 acres
Transportation
The 3rd Addition will be accessed from the north through the proposed Vermillion Grove development on
English Avenue. This access is considered a north/south minor collector running the length of the site with a
jog along 203rd Street in the northeastern portion of the site. This roadway is proposed with a 70-foot right-of-
way width with a 38-foot roadway measured from the face of curb to the face of curb.
The second minor collector in the 3rd Addition is 203rd Street that intersects with Pilot Knob Road to the west
in the 1st Addition and is proposed with a 70-foot right-of-way and 38-foot roadway measured from the face of
curb to the face of curb. This roadway is shown as a future east/west minor collector on the 2020
Thoroughfare Plan. A majority of the traffic is expected to enter and leave the Middle Creek development
from this access.
Erickson Path is considered a local street with a right-of-way width of 60 feet and a roadway width of 28 feet
measured from the face of curb to the face of curb. This roadway connects with both English Avenue and
203rd Street to provide a neighborhood connection in the I st and 3rd Additions.
Staff has reviewed the roadway accesses in the 3rd Addition and since there is adequate connections to the
north and west, 20 single-family lots may be adequately served by these proposed transportation routes.
An 8-foot trail is proposed along the east side of English Avenue and a 5-foot concrete sidewalk is proposed
on the south side of Erickson Path and 203rd Street.
Wetland Requirements
The City's Wetland Protection Ordinance requires a 75-foot buffer area adjacent to DNR Protect wetlands.
The Developer has agreed to plat a 50-foot wide outlot along the entire west side of the DNR protect wetland.
The Developer will also dedicate an additional 25-foot wide conservation easement next to the outlot in order
to protect the vegetative buffer along the wetland. This area will total to a 75-foot wide wetland buffer area
and assist in meeting the City Council's goals of managing the City's unique land and water resources.
Parks
Parkland is proposed in northeast portion of Outlot A and in the south central portion of Outlot E. The park on
Outlot A will include a play structure and walking trails surrounding the peninsula. Outlot E will include a
play structure along with a ballfield and other amenities.
Planning Commission
The Planning Commission met on May 8, 2001 and approved the Middle Creek 3rd Addition with the below-
mentioned conditions.
Engineering
Engineering has completed their review of the plat for the 3rd Addition and has forwarded the comments to the
Developer's engineer. The engineering division requires the following:
1. Confine the drainage to rear and side lot easements. An easement must be provided for all drainage routes
(lots 1 to 4 block 4, lots 1 to 3 block 3, lot 6 block 2).
2. Changes to the construction plans during the review process may necessitate changes III the plat
easements.
ACTION REQUESTED
Consider the attached resolution approving the Middle Creek 3rd Addition Final Plat contingent upon the above
listed engineering requirements.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Lee Smick, AICP
Planning Coordinator
cc: Larry Frank, Arcon Development, Inc.
Don Patton, D R Horton
File
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND AUTHORIZING
SIGNING OF FINAL PLAT
MIDDLE CREEK 3RD ADDITION
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington,
Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 2151 day of May, 2001 at 7:00 P.M.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member _ introduced and Member _ seconded the following:
WHEREAS, an application meeting City requirements has been filed seeking final plat review and
approval of Middle Creek 3rd Addition; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the preliminary plat on the 8th day of
May, 2001 preceded by 10 days' published and mailed notice, at which all persons desiring to be heard
were given the opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS; the City Council reviewed the Middle Creek 3rd Addition Final Plat; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be feasibly served by
municipal service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above final plat be approved and that the requisite
signatures are authorized and directed to be affixed to the final plat with the following conditions:
1. Execution of a Development Contract between the Developer and the City of Farmington and
submission of security, payment of all fees and costs and submission of all other documents required
under the Development Contract.
2. Reimbursement of City engineering, administrative and legal costs and expenses incurred by the City
in connection with the plat.
3. Confine the drainage to rear and side lot easements. An easement must be provided for all drainage
routes (lots 1 to 4 block 4, lots I to 3 block 3, lot 6 block 2).
4. Changes to the construction plans during the review process may necessitate changes in the plat
easements.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 2151 day of
May, 2001.
Mayor
Attested to the _ day of May, 2001.
Interim City Administrator
Location Map
Middle Creek 3rd Addition
~~~ 177rm~ \ II Jfi!,}pmr:Y
~~~I~~ r~[p
:::J/nll Irl(\\~ ,~~ ~~'-
=
~IIIIIIIIIIII ~ \\\
-~~~ ~ /;:~ty "
~ ~ Site
Ir~ 1\
~~!\)) ~
fr\\\6\ V \ ~
~
'-
Cl
a:::
C\~
W*E
S
)
11
~
"}. \ \
\ \ I
\\\ ~
l\~
~
'\
'" '\. -Y.~\ \ \
L ~~ '\~~\\
I ---""I-- :.:1.\\
Subject Property
=i~!:i ~~
T\y:j ~ I
LJ \\\
~
IV .--- ~
~ 'r~
'--~ / [III
- ~
- f---- ~
I )
nr=~ I
ft
- J
U Ir\ I-l /7
Ip l IL~ ~
NOF"
PRE
Sub ject
without
ARY
to revision
notice.
!n . 0 ~io~~
l:~liIr~~
I ;! ~21: ~n ~1IIP1i'"
"'~ ag~",,,,
1'1 ~~I -.....
~~~~i, ,~! ~ Sri ~ill~~a
c';:l~ ill~ fIl III ;!~;!~Z
!m "'-
~~::;ii f! ~';:l 1'1... ~
"!Hoo
~ nz !;co:i!:i!
iiiS! - !Z!!j! "~~~g
~xm!;>1 i Ill",
1:.~I:l~~~ i: i ~~ C:zlll
!ll-~ I jii"-l;
~2~;1Il~> ~~ "''''fib
~~",z .~ ~~ _2 lIl..~z
po ~S!~Z~ ,. !;e o~all
i i "'c ;!~- ~
h;~r ~ifi pos! !OJ ~
I: . 0
~ I >lil ~
ziil Illg
iil ~6 ~
fi... ~
Ii III
Iil'" ~
II i
I
I 1"'1
I >
I ~o
I iC::n
1-,0 ~ ~
: uJ~
I .. >~
L_ _1_::n>
i-r- ;~
I oc
: ~E
r'o ~~
I c
I Yo>>
I
I
'/
v~ ' /~~
I '/ I :
I ' I.,.~ I -.J
L 1___
u____=_:,. .
.- ;z::::=
, ,
"'\",:
\ I,
~~
~g
~.
E~ i
40140 ~
i ~
i I'f1
i
~ i
g i
i
i
i
i
i
iN
. ..
I~
.~
I ,
i ;
" ;.1/
"~.{.
\y.
/J
,
~/~
i
i I
i /
i I
i /
,,-,", / I
SOO'23'2J.W .' I
813,88 I / ~ I
I . 110 I
I /e; I
/ / I
I i I
1'1
~ / I
I tii I
I I '/ I
I 'I I I
1/ / I
( ,,~ (
\cf,>,,'i~ I _____
J <rq,L~ _1_________
-- .....................-
:z: ~
o
o
..fi." .. ,
cJf '\.1;1.'" r'
~\,\
,/' tt--
465.00
NOI '38'2J'(
"
"
"
,.
",," !
~
~
'"
..
l"
...
..
'"
...
l"
8
&('- ,'--
,.,., ,
I \__
_L___' SOI'J8'2J"W ,275.00
\ ,
'......- 315.00
--465.00 -_
301,88
o
\
\
\ ",
m\''''
~~ I
lil!i ;!
F~
~ ~
, n
~
CJ)~
~~
!!!~
~
~
e
.
I
I
,
1..'
').
,
,
{.
o
!
PI
PI
...
...
~
LI
!2
PI
PI
iiI
-----;r-------,
,--- I '."" I
I ~" '7' I
I I".. I
: \''';>,, I
I ~~", I
I
, /,7 I
I ,.
i. -- _____I,
' ".~"
<" I
I
~
()
::l
o
z
51Jl
O'
z>...
O:::l~
1Il~.
~ ~
I::~
~.'"
AI
(;)
f'1
N
o
W lINE Of' ~ ~~4:~ _ _ ~
r----- llrZTW -- I
~-- socrZU8 oz
\ J::IE
on
~
I ;
z ~
I~ ~
~e J:
i ~;O
..
o
",
,
,
\
,
\
,
,
\
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
"
,/
,-
"
..............-----------...
,
,
I
I
ZO:
o/T1:
lIl-t1
~)> \
f;ir \
\"
"-
~;a ~;a
~. ~'..
d~c; d~~
"'O(,l~O.
y. ~ ~88
q .
,
I
" jJ.r\II.l'I
~~~~1lO
-- ~
~<'\.
r>.~~ ."'_
,'\ "- is'J..9>'''
Uc'~~ "a'.
~~.s:,. '<Ii
v.,~?
~.
z
5f:
q.
8~
.
E
3:
-
o
o
r
fT1
o
c
rt
o
-I
o
z
m
~
8 ,~
E./
./
()
;0
fT1
fT1
^
,....
-
"
~.
u
;0
o
"
\
,
,
I
,
~
:i!
c
~
Iil
~
~
'"
)>
o
o
-
::I
o
z
/
/
/\
\
\
/ \
,
,/ \
I
I
I
I
<.">
<.">
o
c
5
-I
OJ
<;' ,/ ~
/ l:
/
/
/
/
~
~
o
c
rt
o
-I
>
{(\
li
~
i
'p
,
\
\
\
\
"" I
""'''' J
.............iII.../
,/
,/
/
I
\
,
,.....
./
./
./
517,97
,
400,00
\
\
SOO'23'2J.W
897.87
I~
~
p
t
I~
E UNE ~ ~~ ~~-=~_~ __
SO~?I~YW
"'z
1;1'1
on
7~
s!OJ
~lil
~x
-'"
ij
~
ililil
,~~
' 8 I N
~.:-~ ~00_"2!23'E _ _ _ ~~~ :??;ef '"
~
'"
~
(,0
fi\
(,0
~
I::
iil
:c-
-u ::
). ;~
~"
" .,
^ --t
r,J :;~
:;!:
C)
).0
C) c:
Ow
-i
-i
_7.l
() --
;:: )..
.
o
!!liI!.!!jZ
a~~2~~~
~~2!!i;;l~
~~i~E'1
6zlill!l~~"
1Cl2:;!z~iii~
~x",~i!~CII
1i~~A~IP
h" ..-~
G!t~~J:~1
~;;;"211l5.
. i",ilai""
",!i!..::jz~
~I~i~"
~~ iJl
iil
i!l "'~
~ ~o
.. a~
2 ~,
z co'"
" ez
~ lCl;
E ~~
!i! ",-
~ ~;
'2! -2
,. !~
I
..
III
..
~
-'1
t
~1 ~ "fa
g!'lN ~ ~ ~
.y.6 I ..a,1j ~ ': flII.
... p" ..,.-'- ~~ "",;P . !\
~Q'r O~'il\ l\1l~ I ';:::>, ,( 'I !II tJI.O!QII.~ .........
"" ..... '" ~ __> ___ I ,.' /:." 4'1 ,"'"
. ~.....,,,' I i'.~ .., I,
",d<" _ " L""-- ,;;IiI--
'" .\-__ IIf...;~
. _--tl III 'lo."'tii..
__ 'S ~__--- II.L... II tIi/:ClI'fU.
_//1 il,~g ~.
I ' ~I:g!l! : I'~ /
<<<""d lJ:.; ~ J - --1 ~ \
;:~ //g'- I -'. ". --
/';t~%~ ~h-' --,::- ~' ' G ~~-";~''''\
/..'h ''''''A. --- 'I, ..x Y' ~~
g/ . - "II' . ... \ ....
/./ _ .'-<-- _ ,_ \\ "~cD "'~
/../ \ ~. oJ'"
~;,. D~ D,'"
/, '.IN"!? 0 "'" .... 0
,if- "jp 'Ii' '"" .. ..
",jy r" :>,! ~ '"
.,..,#--> , C' ~ J.
/~y "J.
/.~ ......~"""
/// ~'\I
',t,,'
).
7.l
()
:;~
g
",
CJ>
~
:t
c;'
o
c
?
o
-I
."
r-
'4'0
(>
I'-
1/
!i~
~ ~
~ -
-. .
~ ~
J.
,>.
()
'Pi
<'"
<
...;
cD
p
it \
-
1-'- - <'"
,~ \
iii j=l I
i ~
_.J
--
/.', ~
" ./ 0
- ........./-
',~ &
<'"
ir
/
.~Z.~~OOS
<,,1
(."l
c;'
<,,\
3.~z.r~OON
8~'9Ui
~ir ~ -----_u_u_u_
~; /
006- ,.,
(,1 · ~
-i
7.l
ro,
r',
-i
1-
':'
o
(
~~
(.1
-i
<
N
o
o
z:.
NO'
PREL...... _ARY
Subject t . .
without 0 .revIsion
notice.
~
-
o
o
r
fTl
,
,
()
::::0
fTl
fTl
^
y ",2
;:f IiIC
..~
M~
iil
0J
::::0
o
,
--,/'
I
I
,
\
\
\
,,'---~+C2
~~ll,
~ .i"\,
)>
o
o
-
-f
-
o
z
. i
i i
h
I i
I I
II
".
I
II
".
-~
t
n
....
NO'
PRE_
Sub ject
without
I
ARY
to revision
notice.
3:
-
o
o
r
(T1
()
;0
(T1
rr1
^
-f-f-f-fmmmm
0000....
-f-f-f-f0000
~~~~~~~~
~a!g5""'UfN-
....C'>-f-f..II.
>:!i5>!'>=-~=-
.!!.b-f~~~s~
0"'1 >>m~""'U1
U1 :0 CD
o~""11 ~>>>
1O>>;-lon~O
......-<.""':o:O....~
U1>IOUf........1Il1ll
:0......""" III III
>..... ....
~>~>
~II ~~
o ....
:">1Il
~~
CD....
III
)>
o
:0
....
III
^
f'1l
-i
()
I
UJ
;0
o
)>
o
o
-
~
o
z
...-1<*.....
* !l! ...
.coO"
*5'Z*
Ii ~m
-ls'JI
,.co
I .
II'
I
~JWI~
"2." ~ i
ir.HI
n~li
f :~
! .
" ~
2' i
o
o
\J
;:0
fTl
C
s::
z
)>
;:0
-<
\J
r
)>
-l
",
;0
o
00
Z;o
o'
1"1:r:
~~
od
~~
1"1_
Zz
,--l P
Z
P
s::
o
o
r
fTl
o
;:0
fTl
fTl
^
)>
o
o
:::!
o
z
!e
'"
'"
-I
~
!i1
""
o
Vl
Iii
'"
-<
Vl
g:~:
il~
~n
~~!
~F
~ ~
~j~~ '
ii.,lr.
i~
~~
".
o~
< ,
= .
...
fi.~
f~
.~
r-;:
~~
2'
..
~
o
o
Vl
~
!:l
.,
~
o
~
f'1
'"
"
'"
S
!:l
::;.;;;:....=.o-
~~~~J
c m -
it~:!.5U1
~ ~5.ii et
::J ~ ~ III ~
HiH
u: 0 __
Q.~O
HH
III "'::J-'
, ~Cl.~
~. 0
m -
80
........ I
/ I
....
....
/' 0
{
593
l /
\ I
I ~ ~
578
I ~ I
0'"
I 1'0
r'
\
r
"
~
"
X
n
Vl
E
,.
8
'"
o
o
~ :z: p>"""
..,
'"
'"
...
Q
I
I
I
I
>-,0
I
I
I
I
r-'O
I
I
I
I
N
0>
N ~
N:::::
1/-
1
I \
-+-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
(
I
-----.\
I
I
I
J---- ..-'
-- - - - - .:.::--=~:='::= - - --
;~_.-.-. .- - I
I
'--
---
o
L'
"
o
"
c'
~
-i
r
>
Z
o
/'
/
/
/
:..
F~
s
L
E
S4S
'<0
- -- -JiO::.;:-
0>
465 0 c. s. A. H.
~m. 3~
NO. 31
"- ---
(E55<:X A"""'lO; -792- -. -- -
(ESSEX A\9IUE).......la.5 _ 4.4911 Qt.
iim
~!I!
=
SHEETS
"
"
::..
w I! .:>
G
~ ~~
~ ~..
0
~
,/
,/
\..
1/
{ .
/}(I/
,,/. !
-_./ /'
. /
"-
"- '-.
~
'-
,,/
/
~2
16
-..,
~ ..
\,
'-~-~~
" )
'-
.'9
705
N
<0
o
------------- ----
~--."
11\
-i
r
>
Z
o
/
,/
"\
\ ,,'-
)> Vl r- Z
is; ;:: )> c
)> '" ;::
'" r;; " lD
)> '" '"
~ ~ ~ '"
r r !?,
':l ~ ':l r
0
-<
Vl
1"1 I
)> I
Ul I
1"10 I
-=;0 I
'Z'~ I
I
-tZ I
Ul)>
(;) I
"'1"1
;0", I
I"1z I
UlO I
I
OC I
I
~p I
I
:2~ I
1
I
C I
~ I
I
I
'" I
~ '" '"
0 '"
-0 '" <> <0
<0 0 '"
'" ..
. ..
.
v
b ~ b ~
~ ~ ~ "f:.
o 0 r ;;0
~ ~ ~ 0
~ 9 ~ ~
VI ITI_
)> ,. '"
'" '"
r I ,.
! I
I I
I II
, i I
I I I I
I I I I
I I , I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
;:; ;;; '" ~ ~
0
<0 in '" '"
in i:l
'" ~ ~
" '"
0 ~ 0 ..
0 n
r
ig:~la;:~II~~~lgf~~:ii~~rl~l:~~i~l~ltiiJl~ifi ~
-3gbJ!!.(l3g:1:<li;I~i<lt !ig~~..a~;7~M~~i,' :~;!S.lg:ri:'l~~'- ~
a~'~o~:~'lto..ijl!~~Cl5t~~t[i.g:(l-813:l~'il'<~fO:;l: :5fl;~ft!11 1F
8iaial:a;!~~~~f~~~~5t ~~f::~;111~;~:~~;~~:I!~~ ~
~0~:Q~8~~!:i:5t;Qa~~~~B~~~~Cla~.o;_'~ggu~~~~a;~ ~
.,:OCi;ra.. ! ....I>..:lig.a~~l1l.<< ....;0<0 5t5t3NQ.-:;. Q.g.g~;wR. 1.1.. ~
! ~ ~ ~ i,li ~ f~l!i~ t:; g;! ~~ i~:: i i l1.!ff;.:fgai~~ ~J It{ If
o~o .....:;Jo~e . c:~ .-., <l 7~ll. i"u,iJ; /all. !"lCS."" zo.... S
o~-ffCi~:z,'~~~;~i~lI3il~~~lf.~ :;&;~8a:f~~!~1 -
3aS;s=g_"p:Q;'-;:a~ Jt-<1 -..=rCl"~~;~"~~o-li"r....o_a~iil ~
~'E:~!.'!iLi~-i=lO.. 'V :.. o;~. ~.J ~ ~:'-5tf2.;: : .... :':::fl ;:s.g;~s==- Ill!.: j: i
ii '".-;.;~%~! sJ!! p_~.:~l: - 0 i~'5;~l!:: B ~ ~.~!:" 81~~ ~ 8lls;;~~ z
8g~(l~~i~~lJ~5tu;~gtr~ia~8~~~~it~f;~~~'~~~f[:i a ~
R5ts:t:85.~a.~!l~:::Q~Q~"~if~~~::':;'~!.aQ.:il"'io~g:;Q i -<
~~!~ii~i;;~~f~;ijli~i!J!;:~f~::r~~~:f:~~;;i ~ ~
0:08"l~~:g;'=."lts:8~~o9.~:pG-O'-"~;!li5:=78-i'-";=to33~~ V' ~
~:l~ ~"8~~~~g ~~;:1t~ ~l~~!~:;i ~: s. i! ~8:; ~'~1~[~~ II ~ ~ ~
-~...-:c. ~3o~l!: ~n&.n"~i"::-;"Q"n.~:rQ. it".... ;-~oJ.g31;"!.~. i ~
~l~o~~.o~S-ci:~~~~~.i:::.:-~Q.i!:i1~~8"Oi;'!f::i:~&~.:2e!,~ .g: ..,
a~~1:il::=!~;!~:gt:~1~~~~;~fi2l~!~~!ii~M~~~ ~ ~
.~ 4..8 g.o.a711 ~Qln,gE.~_~ "nii.e.;j'U~ '-~i"-:;oot ~ .
~~i1~3 8[~3:! ;[~ . ill! s~~~;:i ~~ ~ =![-!. ,-~=l~"H.HN ij'
gii:r~;f:::~zilto~-f8~~Q.! g~~a~l:~.tG-~~ig. ~
I~~ 8=-8 ~'g~Ul}~~~; if! agftl~;:'~ll !.1~ 'fi ~ fi I-~fi;!- ce f $!I
a~ '8~ oQ 3o-_s..- e:=f~~i:-!;!i' f z...~o ot:.ii 2.' 2-
C;4'- o9.i"!2~!"lCl-g:-!t!t:li_~o.:-8l;:Z-nQ.fIO~O(.ollllS.~:'...rn2.g~(.oIo '0
- _.!... O'-~-ii'n""!..5'Q.:5'c::.. .'aiiRg. a;:;~i..=o::TI2's.oC~O f
7~ci~",~00:if',~.0-'.<l8:l:'_0 ...~".,,~ li'~._,~,. .,.. _
.=<;:"~g='!f:ru.g;;r"'.2io_;:O-2.'V! . !~~_. t.ofg:f'!5:!'V!!.!S'_ '<a~~.; (l
l~~.8:~~-~i ~~:; ~ iiili~ ~~'ffi~~~: s I :~~~i :~'::~fi:[ i f
as~J~~:;~~l~8~~!a:!j3ig~~E~i~::fJtl;:ii'~:o~ g
1:;:j8~~i::~; f~~Fn~~oj~:~!..l~f[~!g;i.[~ffi~;;~
~.:;g~~rff~!:t: ~t5!.2- ~I oI'!;l~ifi~;~J'~'" ~:~:g
~:~ g;fI8~"t i ~ a2.~ J:7;Ia:5:~o ~~
In !'<.... 0 N ..
II
III
"
l
516
'.?~ I
"- \",; I
'-
, '-
'" ,-
~ "":;-"
<Y
c...("~
l'
'"
en
"\
1-
/ ,
ls .It,
{)
<.
'- '.
~-
,,/
,/
"-/
,,/
eti.~
r~
---
I
. ---
165
N
0>
...
L
ggi.8
~i!i
:~p
!:!.!r 0
;!~
~Y"~
~~3
~I~
!#;
ii;
0:1: .
f~r
i~~
~~~
~~~
;~~
~f;
3ii
S~7
~U
~~
~..,
~n
165
~
-i
r
>
Z
o
/t'
~-)
...
'"
,,/
\
\
180
f2..
l
d
-< ~I- ~c.. -0
~ ",<0 ",0 ~
"OJ Gl:r: '"
> . '" (iiz -0
'" zOJ ~f' >
f'1 ~
)> 9 '"
"'r 0
0> CD
-o(g -<
~o u
~z (5
'" Z
Vl '"
Vl '"
(5 ~
Z '"
>
r Z
rl "
z
)> PI
Z '"
0 ;u
Vl Z
c p
~
f$i -0
-< ?>
0
~
f' ~
?~
9 l
p ;
~~
h
~
[
,g'
iXf!grg~~~~!~:f~~;8~~~~~5~1~~f[i
:!~..r~I~~:~~~!i~Stlff~~I.~;CIJ~1
l~:;~~~~:i[~:i!:ii~i;;~~;li:~~~i
~a2.:f~~:o~~~a:i~:~!~g!~~i~g~~1~
~! ~- c ~:l~q,!l~~~ gl~: Q i~ !.~: Uli2.g~:f
l~ig~~rr~:~~~~~S~~~~~7~~~iiii~1
~~~g~:~.~.~:gN~~1~3~:!~g!:zz!-
a~=~.nc~:~l:-~iQ.a~~~~og~~ s!~~~
~! a<o : ~ f~&~~~~[.q w; :,~ ; 289 ~': i ~~2.
~~r[:f~~::~~:~I~~I:~:~[~~';~f!f
~:!~;~~i~g:8~~~~~;;~~8~:i:~~:~
~;::o~~~~:t~i~~!:~~~fl~~8!:~J~
1~~~l~~ia~li:~iisf~f:::~iE;fl!
~2oif:i":Z.~ 0.....' ,-,,5'Cl3 ~ol!2gUla=.P,
~~~=~~~g&~~i~~~u.~~:a-~~~~zi:.
=~i~;~~~[~t~sgl~~~s~~f~fiIJ:~!
a$~ ~;;- :> :~:~[~~~~i~ 8~ f ~ i~~ :~'i ~r:.2.
~ ~ ~: ~ ~ :gg.f?.5'~~ ~a; i~ f ~ (il! 2 J [,:!f
~~t~"~-~g;Q~~o~~ ~g~!I~~a:z~l!%
i:~~:.g~g~I~~:~~I~~,:g~g~;a~i~
~f:~l~~~~;~~f~!~,!2.:~~~~f::~ !
2.;::.. :Z!;~:~i~s:ogJ:z~-~li~ ;:re :
-8ol!~!~Q~""~'-"i.~~!~!~-o:~' - ~
=n~~i--:~.Q:=~2.of7~~.C~g.:ls 2.
~i ~ ~:: ~S~li t:~g:~ ;~!r=~a ~:z ~I =I.: ;:' ~
::~oC~:::~~I~~=3t::gS:~5'!~i:~~5a~~ ~
;~l~2.~f[~~~l~fr~!!~:~~~:t[~1 N
_3 Ills: a"'e,., "3-r.-...t.I.~o. ~aJ;::;rR:.... yo
i[:;CI 2~:~ r~'~ ~:"r~~ I). g l ;:
= ~ :r: ;=-.. 0 S-o'i .- C
~
~
il
i
[
7
[
~
~
~
;<
~
s
!
~
v
^
v
D
4'3
f9r --.J L
,......'.. ~r',' RO,1.:; ~lGlT or.
204
M;.? ~"~ ~a"'
if,
"
~
-i
r
>
Z
0
. (1)
"
~ ~
0 p,
... p
> ~~
99'
995
;~ '0
t.:> ,-
CJ1 0;'
f'l
I~~~i~fi~~:~li~~;i!~~lli:r~~f~i~
:i'3~"'-3;:~Qg~a."Sg!.c:..r.~g5.o<::: ~:T""s:~-!
~'~'~g~.1 ~:;~ If:r~ s:~ ~1I~ S'1il it: lr2:.:! ~ ~~ {
~ii!~:i~~I~iS~I~!a~I~~ll(lf:~a!
~- ON" .-:~ (.oI....u N-~fl~~ a,_ 7
~~r.~!rCog~l~oi:r~ul~:!=~~:~~"
:l;~~-g~~~!~~a.a.~~&t-~,7a.~~-f~
S CI II:) -"'.c -!:"IC ..-i-....1:11...8~::;;;,l!!
~fg~i~~!~I'~!~flif,;Sf~~~i~~.8~
m::;;~O lCi-.-9~-.~~~_ ~=:;8i~~~i:
1s=;:~I:~!5tQ ~!g,o-'5!2.Qi-;-~2.f;:g.~
-9.~:~;i:~~f.iJ~t~;:2~!-if~3;!!~~
_~=o uZ8-~-~~.-8~z~"'~i=01a-~
~!"'~!K~5. ~i.~ ~tlJl~:~P8f"'Z},i2.
~~~{eg~7f-~5.gi.~! :.8-_I~o~og
~~t_~~~~:'~!~ert&~l~~a_~~~::;:.CI
z_:Pcf'a.;::o:~T~o:fT~:~.:~:~~E
!iN;::r.~~!~~~~~~~-i~~~~2.g8~~~;:
;~=;~:=!~ii~;~il~u~;;!!l~~r~l
.~~ .. ~!h!"~ b!,,~ ~ m[~sll'ol"! ~JJ_-
02. r.: ;;!~ i"~ ~:5!.r.: 3 ::2.i~:7~ c [~!?.: S $.~
~~ia~ef~~~~fr~~~tS~~5!.g_al~t~~
g a:- 2.g 2. !!. if- 4~ i~. ~!!.:,f- \118~! a.~ i S.i
~ g~ ~ f~~~1 [i~!:Hio liS ~~-i "l[ ~. H
2.;:..; r;;Els:... 7:!"!!... III :r~!~.. ;:....! fo.jiS:
~i~-~i~~!le.~=~~.~~~~i.~fig!l~
~ ~1~~~~ai~.~3t!~t3i~S~;:_o~i_
~~~l~;:!?."~~~2.W~~~2.~'~g~~~~::~i
i~i,l!olil~~I:!2~liJ~~:a!?.~=at
:!~::.~o~~;:~o~~;~:~~.:l2.i ft--
~~~_of_~:3~iQ:~:f~13r~i1~~gO;
.~ol~!OI'~~..~!~cl~. 131-0&:.-_
"'l QlJIr.=o~...~ :l~"'~ n -CJ1 ag;:c:a~g
~7~~~~;~i:irS.:a::~=- o~g~~a~
-~iiP~g!?.rt;~2.r~:~-!~fto~~Q~ ~
!?.~~!8i~~"" ~.~- ~~;~ ai:~~!~ p
!a-:>>i!;:o ~~D 120 =. ;g":7J
g - 0 s:~ 7' !3 - f
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
/O~
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council,
Interim City Administrator
Michael Schultz /\, ()
Associate Planner f)Y
Bristol Square 3rd Addition - Replat of Bristol Square 1 st & 2nd Addition
Applicant: Jim Allen
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
May 21, 2001
INTRODUCTION
The applicant, Jim Allen of Allen Homes, is seeking City Council approval to rep1at portions of both the
Bristol Square 1 st and 2nd Additions. The applicant is seeking plat approval in order to accommodate an
alternative design and floor plan oftownhomes that are narrower but deeper than the originals.
DISCUSSION
Jim Allen, Allen Homes, has submitted for review the replat of portions of the Bristol Square 1 st and 2nd
Additions. The developer is proposing a new townhome design that requires slightly deeper and narrower
lots than were originally platted.
The replat is proposed for Lots 1 - 6, Block 1 and Lots 1 - 6, Block 2, Bristol Square 1 st Addition and
also Lots 1 - 7, Block 2, Bristol Square 2nd Addition. The proposed replat would result in an additional
two (2) lots being added to the original 173 unit development.
The existing development consists of 19.7 acres and has a current density of 8.78 units per acre, the
density would increase to 8.88 units per acre if approved, the permitted density under the R-3 zoning
district is 14.0 units per acre.
Lot Layout/Building Setback
The developer is proposing 26' wide by 45' deep lots (for each townhome unit) to replace the original lot
dimensions for both the 1 st and 2nd Additions that were 30' wide by 42.33' deep. The proposed changes
would result in a lot that is 4-foot narrower and a 2.67 feet deeper.
Under the proposed replat, one (1) unit will be added in the location of Lots 1 - 6, Block 2, of the 1 st
Addition and one (1) unit would be added in the location of Lots 1 - 7, Block 2, of the 2nd Addition.
The new townhome units would still meet the twenty (20) foot setback from the private drives. The
townhome buildings, proposed as part of the replat of lots 1 - 6 on Block 2, would be 2.67 feet closer
along 213 th Street W. if approved.
The replat was submitted on April 15, 2001. The Planning Commission approved the proposed replat at
their May 8, 200 I meeting.
Staff recommends approval of the Bristol Square replat contingent upon the following:
1) The developer make the necessary changes to the landscape plan concerning the addition of a six-foot
fence and/or over-story trees for additional screening;
2) The developer submit a revised Preliminary Plat of the remainder of the Bristol Square development
if any changes are planned concerning revisions to lot dimensions to accommodate the split entry
model townhomes.
3) The developer agrees to any additional development fees that. result from the creation of additional
townhome units.
ACTION REQUESTED
Consider the attached resolution approving the Bristol Square 3rd Addition Plat contingent upon the above
listed contingencies.
Respectfully submitted,
cc: Jim Allen, Allen Homes
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND AUTHORIZING
SIGNING OF FINAL PLAT FOR
BRISTOL SQUARE 3rd ADDITION
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 st day
of May, 2001 at 7:00 P.M.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
introduced and Member _ seconded the following:
Member
WHEREAS, an application meetin~ City requirements has been filed seeking a replat
review of the Bristol Square 1 st & 2n Additions; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the replat on the 8th day
of May, 2001, preceded by 10 days' published and mailed notice, at which all persons
desiring to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended City Council
approval of the replat at its meeting held on the 8th day of May, 2001; and
WHEREAS; the City Council reviewed and approved the original final plats for both the
Bristol Square 1 st & 2nd Additions; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be
feasibly served by municipal service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above final plat for Bristol Square
3rd Addition be approved and that the requisite signatures are authorized and directed to
be affixed to the final plat with the following conditions:
1) The developer make the necessary changes to the landscape plan concerning the
addition of a six-foot fence and/or over-story trees for additional screening;
2) The developer submit a revised Preliminary Plat of the remainder of the Bristol
Square development if any changes are planned concerning revisions to lot
dimensions to accommodate the split entry model townhomes.
3) The developer agree to any additional development fees that result from the creation
of additional townhome units.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session
on the 21st day of May, 2001.
Mayor
Attested to the _ day of May, 2001.
City Administrator
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
City Planning Commission
Michael Schultz P
Associate Planner
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Bristol Square 151 & 2nd Addition Replat
Applicant: Jim Allen
DATE:
May 8, 200 I
INTRODUCTION
The applicant, Jim Allen of Allen Homes, is seeking Planning Commission approval to replat portions of
both the Bristol Square 151 and 2nd Additions. The applicant is seeking the replat in order to accommodate
an alternative design and floor plan of townhomes that are narrower but deeper than the originals.
Planning Division Review
Applicant:
Jim Allen
Allen Homes
12433 Princeton Ave
Savage, MN 55378
Complete Plat
Application Received:
April 15, 200 I
Referral Comments:
I. Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Attachments:
I. Application
2. Location Map
3. Bristol Square Replat
4. Bristol Square 151 & 2nd Additions
5. Elevation Drawings of Proposed Townhomes
Location of Property:
NE\4 of the NW\4 of Section 32, Township 114N, Range 19W,
Town of Farmington. East of Trunk Highway 3 and North of
213lh Street W.
Area Bounded By:
Single-family residential to the south and southwest, future
multi-family to the east and west, Light Industrial and the Prairie
Waterway to the north.
Existing Zoning:
R-3 (High Density)
Streets and Accesses:
Internal private roadways serve the development.
Total Number of Proposed Units
Within Preliminary Plat:
173
Number of Proposed
Additional Units:
2 (for a new total of 175 units)
Total Number of Acres of
Development:
19.7 acres
Existing Density:
8.78 units per acre
Proposed Density:
8.88 units per acre
Permitted Density under R-3:
14.0 units per acre
Additional Comments
Jim Allen, Allen Homes, has submitted for review the replat of portions of the Bristol Square 1 sl and 2nd
Additions. The developer is proposing a new townhome design that requires slightly deeper and narrower
lots than were originally platted.
The replat is proposed for Lots 1 - 6, Block 1 and Lots 1 - 6, Block 2, Bristol Square I sl Addition and
also Lots 1 - 7, Block 2, Bristol Square 2nd Addition. The proposed replat would result in an additional
two (2) lots being added to the original 173 unit development.
Lot Layout/Building Setback
The developer is proposing 26' wide by 45' deep lots (for each townhome unit) to replace the original lot
dimensions for both the 1 sl and 2nd Additions that were 30' wide by 42.33' deep. The proposed changes
would result in a lot that is 4-feet narrower and a 2.67 feet deeper.
Under the proposed replat, one (1) unit will be added in the location of Lots 1 - 6, Block 2, of the 1 sl
Addition and one (1) unit would be added in the location of Lots 1 - 7, Block 2, of the 2nd Addition.
The new townhome units would still meet the twenty (20) foot setback from the private drives. The
townhome buildings, proposed as part of the replat of lots 1 - 6 on Block 2, would be 2.67 feet closer
along 2131h Street W. if approved.
Engineering Comments
See attached Engineering comments.
Landscaping Plan
The developer's original landscaping plan proposed pine trees along the back side of the units along 213lh
Street. Staff would recommend either constructing a six foot high privacy fence be along the southerly
property line and/or in addition to the pine trees installing over-story deciduous species to provide
additional screening. This recommendation is given to the fact that the proposed units will be split entry,
resulting in the living spaces above nonnal grade and due to their proximity to the trail and roadway
additional screening should be added.
Additional Comments
The developer has not indicated if any changes will be made in the way of the preliminary plat in future
additions to accommodate the split entry style townhomes. Approximately 48% of the total number of
units have been platted as part of the .1 sl and 2nd Additions; an additional 85 units will be platted within
future phases (this number may increase by 3 to 5 units dependent on the future city park location and the
possibility that the park location could be relocated across the road to the east).
ACTION REQUESTED
Staff recommends forwarding a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the replat of Bristol
Square I sl and 2nd Additions contingent upon the following:
1) Rename the submitted plat from Bristol Square 3rd Addition to Bristol Square 1 sl & 2nd Addition
Replat;
2) The developer make the necessary changes to the landscape plan concerning the addition of either a
six-foot wood fence and/or over-story trees for additional screening along 2 13th Street;
3) The developer submit a revised Preliminary Plat of the remainder of the Bristol Square development
if any changes are planned concerning revisions to lot dimensions to accommodate the split entry
model townhomes;
4) Any changes recommended by the Engineering Department.
Michael Schultz
Associate Planner
cc: Jim Allen, Allen Homes
TO: Mike Schultz, Associate Planner
FROM: Matt Stordahl, Engineering Division
SUBJECT: Bristol Square First and Second Additions Replat
DATE: May 4,2001
I have completed reviewing the revised plat that was submitted for Bristol Square and
have determined that there are no engineering issues at this time.
If you have any questions feel free to discuss them with me.
Sincerely~
~~
Matt Stordahl
Engineering Division
cc: File
rr-.
I :
uf"'............;.......'....-
1 i i iron.
: i > i " ! !
. . .'
\ ~':::..:::..=..:::..:::..~ _t/!:o
_i
/~-
'! ;.~n~.:-.::
f..............:-........--_...
, ' .
, .
. '
~ "l:'
~
...............~ ;
!'''K:: :.::::G~~.....-.~........;
~
i::
~
c:::a
~
~
;t
E.;;
fIQ
.....
---
...,
~
~
~
~
Q:i
I
. .
. .
.:::~_..............i
.t~
~.::...........
,",
: ~:;.
:,",
:.......
:.:::.
; ~~~ s
I-
,----
~I ~ 1 1
0'1 ~ 1 ~--""-~ 1
:" ~"""'T'"j,J I
iii I 'd. i !l.
_r~ ... + s
::il I ---~
t- ~ 1 ~ t<
~ ..~---i- ~
III 1 I!! ~ ; ...
l "I I .. 1
L I
...J
I
W +-'
z*~ co
a.
Q)
0:::
~ '+-
0
C
0
+:i
CO
0
0
..J
"--,
'-.... "'- I
\ , 1\
f =gU U~
j'-
t -- '-
- -
rlj I ~ I II
1~ =M~ ~~~
~
\ ~</(/ 9 '-<J I I .is H.le: ~
\ -(I [3 BB : ~ ~ =lJ
~ \ c:::JD ~ ~ ~
\ r-;
~~\mJ i - , ~~~~
,I
- ~,,~ ::;;
I ~
IF==: ~. - ~ >- (ij ~~~=fl
\'~ : II-- - - .-:!::
- - ~ "2 a.
IR .- en
~I!= - L.. 0 55 I I
~I ... r-::c ::/
If-- ('
~ ~ II __I
I .- -
I - I -
l - -
1- - -
- -- . ~ \
TRUNK ~ IGH W/S.Y3- rn~~~~~m~~~t
1( II I I I
~~ I \
(/ ~~~~1]~m~~~
I 1<
I;;;
,'-
-
I I \ ~~~~~~~~D~
;. -
--/
~ Lt= DD~~~~~~~~~~~
I \ ~( (Q
'-' ~
+-'
m
-
0-
0)
0::
0)
~
,m
::s
0-
00
-
o
+-'
.,..
0-
m
~
c:
o
.-
+-'
m
(.)
o
--I
~
~
e...;
cs
-
,
OL,
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
I
-I
I I
'. l\; \
\' ~ %
\ ,....
'- "tJ,~ \
'\~
<0,
I
~
8
~
~
~
0-
r/),
~ 8
~
,~
~ III
.
!
~ t
In
1.-;'_.
.,::,,~
.-
t::
>-
2
::>
..
~
""
i:
~_.__.__... ------~
."
t
,
I
,
" I
I
I.
I".;
c\..
I
\. N bt6-~1
\... - ,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- III
'!! ". >:r~~~ ~ !NlI'WlOOO ..lcllN~.] dlJS AW.ltft'S ~
I
\
, - - ...--'
antE
:3 .Zt .8l.oo N
... NOI1IOO' 15l:1J 3~.n05 101~ '8 101lflO 3NIl 153M 3M1 OSl.
-.--..-. 61-'"-Z, JO ./IMN 3M1 JO .1I3N 3M1 JO 3NIl 153M 3M1
I
3 ..Zt .St.OO
8O.~Z N
',,-
H J : ~
II J ! !
If I I i
I' I f 1
d I ;1!
~I f ~lf
If I 1'1 1 I
31} i ~J ~ 3 ~
'.1-' ~ it J
I ~: i~ ~
MIl i Ii I
11 J! II "
=11 ~ .Ill ~i
IIi ~ i' i I
I~.. iJ IJ l~
~I.!:! 1- I~
111 :it.!lt
I.i
..;
..;
~~
z
Q
B
""
/,,- "
~
'"
~
II!
~
'"
~
~
cr;
~
g
Be
~=
2'E
-'"
~L
"';
~t
!C
~\
N
....
...- .
$.c =c
~~~~
~ '"
:~f!
z ~
"Illi~
~-'~i
;5;1<5
!~iI1(,)
~~ ~
~gill'
~.. ~
~.o:~
i!i~
h~
~!:l'
~-lt
~>-;
Ole
El;
""'c
-0<
,...it:
~~~
~..
~bt-~
~!Z~
"'1"
i g
l!j ~
-
o
I-
(f)
0::
I.L
i
i
I
i
!
i
i
i
!
"
1"-. "-
I " ""
!~~
I .; ^
. ~ / '~"
!:" / ~"
1 ~.. ~ /
1r-7
1)//
r
I ..
I 0
i
7Z:::.
. I
a~=hrl
2 : Ii~ii~
!~ ~
~ II -
c 'I 'I,
o ~ U...J
.0
)
z
o
I-
-
o
o
<(
;
.w
..
..
l!
~
.. i
/
/
!
i
I
..
"'
.;
"'
..
;
1
a
J.n>.... .....
.......1'1 ..0 ~I_"""" ."J" JM4.MJ I.." ~.J JIlI.lJ
.."
t....
~N a~o~ A~N~C~
.~..... ~ 1It.l4lO IN" u"
---M..II.60.08 ZS'.K_
III
~
...
...
~
III
,
,
;U:. i
.iI :1 .;
"/ -Pi'
. t.1'.
" !
\- :
N
"_~n
I .!
J.oHno',:\ (.E:,i
":tJ.
N
..
w
...
o
I
!
/
!
r
i
i
..'1'1__
J.O'l.I,no;
..
o
..
..
?
o
i:
1i
.,
I-
...
...
~
III
"'I.",UoOS
....ClIt...
..I"'
/
j
i
i
i.
f
~
<II i..... \
, i 'V
~ j ,,~
;~i
. 1/
~ .
i J>
f lit
i.....:tf
.1.0' .I. n 0
'",1..01
... OI"S.
"i
r,.
'}:~
:.:.
,
i
j
I
Ii
f I
i t
, I,....
i
i
!
t-
.,,,,
/
i
/
..
001.1'.-0.0.
:
,
!
I:
.,
J.O"1J.no
.-.....,M'O.
:,'
~1t.
~J...
!o~
..
, ,.
1: :
i; i
I-
o
..J
I ..
i. :I
"l 0
I .1
! ,:'/
..~.:"}.
-:"J
!"..
o
..J
"II-
..
",!
f
J
...~.
OI'~~!n...;'_.~~
::I
..
o
..
..
?
o
.q
CL:
o
, I
: ~ .:.
-a
8~
:!
~~
"'a
z~
i
i
!!~
.!
:t~
7' ~ r..
I l <r
0:
c:i
U
01
c:
.~
>
...
::l
(I)
/~-.
/ l~/i
>.
.!!
g
18
'"
,.
,-
~,
.,.
,"
r~
= ~
.1.0' J.no I;. :I
!
J.o'J.no
....
-..........
. r. 01 .1
..'on':'.
.
.1.0' J. no
l-v
I
,
I
... J"Zt> ,II .ON ot'LOll--
......11..._.....,.........110 JIIN'I...... .~
J'-"I.~OO".~
.~DO" .lIM ........, !ft'I
~::'D'
~ tWIlIlMllt..,"'.
0 I
z ~I 0 ::
::; ~ ~ <;
"I N ~
0 ' .., 2
0: ~l ~
]i: Q.
~ c, ~~
.(<Ci
~ ~ \.oJ ool.oJ. :
~ Sl., ~ :: 5 '~~%.rzJ
~ I ~! ~II>~'.'
<3 ~ ~~ ~
~
~ 8
;: '"
~ ~
~
~
:I;
II> ~
C
~!
~i
.~
"
u<
'0
.fa
.~:~
..~s~
h--
",..,e;:e;:
U"3'
~~i;
!<~;
lI:!...a
S!'#~~
~~5S
g~
:;;::~
...;;0
N
~~.5
H
~!~
...~
;;!~c::;;
O....o~
i~~i1
!~.,
~1~U~
'1.m
~i!i~
~~~~S~
~~ii~i
i!~!~i
~:i!ii2
d!~d
iqL
3 ' , .
"I ~ ~ n
~Ln
~ ~ ~ ;;; l!!'
'! '1 'i g
:5 ~ :5 ~
.alGO
;~~
j~~
.~~
i~;
.,e
.,0
~,,~~
~~~~
~:z''i::;;
~~
~I ~~
:z: ....
z
Ii
iU
-u~
i;~
-". --
"
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
~
~
~
\
,
,
,
,
\
I
\ I
1
\ I
'ji~
(/
.'
i I
I
I
I
I
\~
II
\\
j
I'
,I
:1
1i i i
~. I
H ~~:
Ii ~ ul
g H:
:1 3:
, ,
IL-
ft: 13J~1~
d: HIN3jl~IHl
ZI r--
<>, I
"',
01 I
WI
1 I
,
i I
,
: I
~N I
'g i~ g;~ i I
~Q. I "'~; I
:;; i :g, I
: 'I:
''-.....'~ ' ,
" -J ..l : 'i: ,
! I ! j l
',I a., I
II ~ i il
, 1 I
l iL_
l --I 133!llS
, , - d HU13/U
;, ('I-
II I I
11 i I
, ,
:,' i I
~ : I
I, I
_~JI i I
\~I !I
fli I
-J~- I
,::>,
1,..:1 I
""
,
:I; ,
....'
M'
(\j
"
"
"
'I
:1
~ I
'I
.
,
------~
,....,
: ',.
I """"
~- "..
z .>
~~ .
~i l ///
~ ..
- ~\ //
N
~~
.1
!~ .. -
Ii .
J .t~60.0lJ N \
, IoC .
-------,-
,
~~
~
u
"I
o
0:
Q.
~
~
~
~
~
u~~~
..q~~
0: ";-':1;;""
~ -J~u<
~ E~<:~.f
~~~~
::J::iO"'~
cg~
i;
!':!'
~ ~
~
0:
ill
:tj
6 I!
~ iit
~ .:il
~ ~:I:
tj ~:i;
ah
;I~~
!ill
Il
u
~ ~
~.. ~
1e '"
::SiQ'" '"
g<<l@~~
~~ ~~~
~6ttJ~~
a:: ~~ sf..,;....
.., ~<<l cC'O
~ I:l"'~;:;
G ~ <oJ"':,,:
~ ..Je::~~~
~S ~<~
~~ N~~
:8 ~~l
); ~u~
:s - ::2-
-.l ::::
~ ~
0 Si 0
z
... " z
. :; ~ ~! ... "0
- - - - - - - - ~
- a ~: ~
1 ! j r. :l:
. . 0: V>
- - - - - .~ 11.
-- =.......... ::=.: i::::: .._....; --. -- "l
-. --=.:: - ~ ~~
~! :t~ ::.t~ srt:ti 1~:ii :rift :r~:r :r:i ::ti ...-;; ::TO- ;;; ..
.. I ~ ' . i'! ~:~ ~ z~z:
a1:e :i:~~ ~~3~ ~g~g 8g:g ~g~ i8g~ '0' o~ o~ ~I z ~ . . I ~ <t
r..""., ~~ ~~ <t
~i ~~ ~..~ ;:~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~:::~ "";"'0 ~.. <1>'Q " ~. "" 0 w.u ~ ':i.' N
~.. .."'~ ~:.~ w. ~~ ;: : 5 z V>
,...~~ g:~: ~~~ ~.. ?c . I - ~i ~i~ ~
~! d'i-~ ;E:-":d ~..'lIJ -'"
~ ~- :JI '" ,~ !
;;- "
.. - ~ :!2~ ~~ ~
~, ~, , "" lIl.!.r-- ~;: -, ~
",-~ S~:~ g~: g;.o :.c;':'~ gi!':: . .. ~ .
v~ ~l!!...l!! ~~ gl!!.... ~ ~
aS~ 0__ ~So ~ ~
lIloO ilSS9 sOoo al99 aloo lIloO aloo aJ~S ~ ~
TmlSll.'1^QJcf lM1ijll.~
----------------
=1
, '".
, H
t--u----------- I
I Ii ,... Hi
,
, ~ : J__J rU
Q: 1
<t :l~Ji
Q. 15J
i lij
,.. ! rr- --, ~
I- ~.5i:
u I ~H ...
~ :~ (,) CI
!oj .,
~ , j~J 0 ~
i 10.0 , 0:
, :;:if 11.
,
! , ~
I Ii!
/5 I
I
I
I ~~li!!
c;J ~~
I .J..J~~
0: ..;~~'"
~ >,.l!:l~"'
I ~ ~~~<<i
0 '" "
O! 0.;::;
I cqQ.~~
u~
L-
eu 133~lS
.....
d HIN331~IHl
z r
<=l
Q: I
d
u
I
I
I
- I
;
~ I
~ ~ !Ii
.;: 0;;:
~ I a ill
~:.! ~!~.,
- - - '" ~i tf ,j
<t
I (,) "" ~I ,;
;:;:
'" if!:
0: ~js
I ... i.ia
u i:il
,!! ~,~
L '~
~ii
133~lS
HU13/U U ~
~
r-= '-f !ol
~ ~
=s~., ....
I S g'&l~~~
'&l ""..
:;,; ~;i!:~~;
I . ~t; '<:i3 "';0:-'-
a: E-..;2: :5~~
l:l ~<<iO~:2.
I ~~~~i5; ;:; Cjcq~"
.o~ N Ii ~~~~
0(..1 ~K w E:: t::S1
I <:,J tlo~;: ~~;;j~~
~~Ctl:lor::;-
I ~ ~ ~"!:l~ '&l~~~!
~ ,.~~~ ~<:,JS;U;i;-
0: ~ ~~ - -
I Dl ~..~ - :2.
__ Uj__ ...~ ~li! .... I::l
,.; I ~a~ ~ ~ ~
'<;~~
\..~--- ------ III ::.:~li!'!l;i;-
~2 ~ '<;:go.;-
.... ~- ~
~~ M N
(\j ~
M
:::>
., _.....~
;J .1"'-40 f'I
....,
~
~
II ~ (J"I",
~
~ M
~ u
i: <
jl ~
~
.1 "/il'.It '1'<!t ~1S..G." ""':>>tt.
JG."JH~lA:>>tI1J.S]t\lII1
~'
6iI ~ f-+
!
[1', (,
\_. I '
\"1':, ,\-'
. ~I
-I
"-. .
\
/ !
L
I :
It,
,-
:i i I~
I!.... I~:
~I I
-' I
~'
,.a \
I
!
l
i.
I
, I
!
~/L. L
~r,'i 8
t
! I , I :1
; \U
i : , I I
,
"
I i
: ; !
I I
, I \
I
t
I
i ,
- I
! ! I
I i
I ,
I I'
-~-_.- ~
i I
I : I
I
G I
, I
r -- -.,
I \ 1
"
----_.~
I I
!
I
i
I i i
. , I
I i ! I
I
!
B \
I
L 1
i
! ;
I
: i ,
I I
_ n J I
J
, 1
I
I L ----
i I
i l - L_
. .-0. i I I
-..
-;
~
(:-
-~
, I
I I
I) I,
I I
: I I I
! I
I I
I
I
I I
I I I \ III
I I !
I I ! i
I
I I
II I ,
! l
I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I
\ I ,
I
I I ' I
' I
i I
~I
-,rl
lA'
\=
, ~ II!
- - -~'{~
\
II
i
\
I
i
I
i
. . ..-}-r
.1 ,.'
! :~:
: .+.
:~. _1
~
'2
j
\~
'L
-.- ---,.!-~. :
I- I
!
\' ,
, .
t-'"
-I
"
-'
~, I
J~i
I
,
:ti
I-I
. '
, .
U',
~i
t'
ii.
-~;
~ i
.\ i
~ ,I
. .oz..,;.1
~ II . ~ ~-I
JI .If - I .'
::s I ,So 1lf\1
~ I 1 ~ I~l
1> f ,t
~ ~, '~I : :
~ jJ, l ~ I I
I " ~
- -r ~ -,f--' I
!l I" /. f ,~I'
1 1\ : I I
'> *,.1, I
I', ~:i 7; I '
ill ' .~. I I i
! , ~_jlll
I i
kr
-J
-:\
.
, '
i !
,
d
I' \1 [JJ ~
t E3
I i
i S
I, t
\ DUJ I
I ~ ~
1\ \1[1] ~ tJ
I nmj :
!
I \l0J
!
I' .
\
~
~
j
~
~
!0-
k
,i '. i
I I
I
\ Ii
, I
I<
-
~
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
lOci
TO:
Mayor and Councilmembers &'\f\./
Interim City Administrator l^>'
David L. Olson
Community Development Director
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Bernard and Molly Murphy
Properties
DATE:
May 21~ 2001
INTRODUCTION
Bernard and Molly Murphy have petitioned the City to amend the City's Comprehensive
Plan for two parcels they currently own east of Akin Road and south of the future
alignment of 195th Street that comprise 197.36 acres from Restricted Development to
Low Density Residential.
DISCUSSION
The original petitions filed by Bernard and Molly Murphy requested both a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment from Restricted Development to Low Density Residential and a Rezoning from C-l
(Conservation) and A-I (Agricultural) to R-l (Low Density Residential).
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on these petitions on April 1011\ 200 I and
continued the public hearing to May Sth, 2001 in order to receive additional information. Upon
closing the public hearing on May Sth~ the Planning Commission voted to deny the requested
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change at this time on the basis that the City's
Thoroughfare Plan, Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, Comprehensive Water Plan and
Surface Water Plan need to be updated prior to considering amending the Comprehensive Land
Use Plan to allow residential development in this area. This recommendation passed on a 3-0
vote.
Since the Planning Commission recommendation was made, Bernard and Molly Murphy have
amended their petitions to withdraw the rezoning request portion of the petition (see attached
letter). This was done to allow the City additional time to consider a Comprehensive Plan
amendment and not be bound by the statutory time frame for a decision to be made within 120
days as specified in Minnesota Statutes for rezoning requests.
The Comprehensive Plan makes specific reference to this area as a "community green" that will
connect the northern and southern sections of the City in Land Use Policy and Strategy #5 on
page IS of the Comprehensive Plan (copy enclosed). This land use strategy intended that the
"community green" be a "nature influenced activity node where natural, residential and
recreational uses dramatically combine to provide distinctive residential opportunities~ a variety
of active and passive recreational opportunities and a unique community gathering place." Since
this strategy was still conceptual~ the Land Use Designation of Restricted Development was
designated for area until this concept became more refined.
Since the completion of the Comprehensive Plan almost two years ago, several potential aspects
of the "community green" have evolved somewhat. The idea of one larger man-made lake has
evolved into a chain-of-lakes concept that may result in a linear series of smaller lakes and/or
ponds that began in Autumn Glen and could possibly extend to the northerly City limits east of
Dakota Estates and south to the main branch of the Vermillion River.
The other potential aspect of the "community green" was to include a City developed park and
ball field complex south of 19Sth Street in this area. The Park and Recreation Commission has
recently determined that their preferred location of this facility would be on the north side of
19Sth Street possibly in the Seed-Genstar Orderly Annexation area.
If the Council wishes to pursue a possible Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Bernard and
Molly Murphy properties, it should indicate this by referring the matter back to the Planning
Commission for further study which would include updating the Thoroughfare, Sewer, Water,
and Surfacewater Plans. It is anticipated that this additional study would take up to twelve
months to complete. The Council may also request the scheduling of a joint workshop with the
Planning Commission to discuss the issue further prior to further study of a possible
Comprehensive Plan amendment.
ACTION REOUESTED
The Council may consider the following options:
1) Deny the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment at this time and indicate whether it
wishes to initiate further study and the necessary updates of the Throughfare, Sewer, Water~
And Surfacewater Plans in order to consider a possible Comprehensive Plan Amendment in
the future.
2) Deny the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and indicate that no further study be
completed.
Council should also indicate whether a Joint Workshop with Planning Commission on this issue
is desired.
~~
David L. Olson
Community Development Director
cc: Bernard and Molly Murphy
Glen Nord
05/16/01 WE~ 16:35 FAX 952.469 4940
RGN TMD
~002
R. GLENN NORD & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
Post Office Bo;K. 427
20686 Holyoke Avenue
LakeviJle. Minnesota 55044
(952) 469-4948
Facsimile (952) 469-4940
May 16,2001
David L. 0 !son
Conununity Development Director
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
VIA FACSIMILIE & U.S. MAIL
Re: Bernard Murphy
Our File Number: 17486
Dear Mr. Olson:
This correspondence shall confirm that Bernard Murphy and Molly Murphy are herein
withdrawing their requests to remne their respective parcels. The parcels in question are
the ones discussed at the Farmington Planning Commission hearing on May 8, 2001.
Very truly yours,
!Illk
R. Glenn Nord
RGN:mcc
cc: Bernard Murphy
Molly Murphy
6730 Lakeville Blvd.
Lakeville. MN 55044
April 10, 2001
Farmington Planning Commission
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Farmington Planning Commission,
I live on ten acres next to the Bernard Murphy land and very near the other property
south of 195th Street and north of 208th that is currently zoned "Restricted Development"
and the subject of tonight's hearing. I oppose any change of the status of this land from
"Restricted Development", and any rezoning that would lead to development of this land.
All of my neighbors that I have talked to agree that this land should not be developed and
no change to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan should be made concerning the zoning of this
land.
This area of "Restricted Development" is the last sizable piece of undeveloped land in
Farmington and there is already too much development in the area. There are concerns
about wildlife~ open spaces~ wetlands, high water tables and other issues that affect this
land if it were to be developed. The disruption to current residents of this area of
Farmington if this area were developed and the affects on Akin Road should be
considered. As you know~ most residents are very concerned about the high volume of
traffic and safety issues on Akin Road, any development of this land woul4lead to more
congestion and safety issues on Akin Road. If you would like more input on this matter
from my neighbors and myself, you can contact me at 651-463-7941 or 952-985-6521.
Respectfully yours,
6IritwJ tlJpJ7 M j II Ii
Brian Herzf~ld~ v1~r
20218 Akin Road
Farmington, MN 55024
,
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.d.farmington.mn.us
FROM:
City Planning commiS(jJ)S' on .
Lee Smick, AICP
Planning Coordinator
TO:
SUBJECT:
Petitions to Amend the Comprehensive Plan and Rezone the David Finnegan, Bernard
Murphy and Molly Murphy Property
DATE:
May 8, 2001
INTRODUcnON
At the April 10, 2001 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed petitions to amend the
Comprehensive Plan and Rezone the David Finnegan, Bernard Murphy and Molly Murphy properties east of
Akin Road, south of the proposed 195th Street alignment and north of the Riverside Estates development. By
. the Commission's request at the April 10, 2001 meeting, the petitions for the properties were reviewed
together, therefore staff will continue to review the properties as a connected region because of their
significance to the City's transportation and sanitary sewer systems.
DISCUSSION
The three properties together total 285.86 acres. All three properties have petitioned a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment from Restricted Development to Low Density Residential and a Zone change to the R-l single-
family residential designation. The properties currently are designated C-l (Conservation) or A-I
(Agriculture) as shown on the attached map.
The Restricted Development area was envisioned to preserve natural areas, while creating passive and active
recreational areas and utilizing its location as a central gathering point between northern and southern sections
of the City. The Comprehensive Plan also addresses. this area as the "Farmington Community Green"
connecting the northern and southern sections of the City thereby reflecting "conservation of the City's natural
assets, while providing sensitive design of residential uses and opportunities for recreational uses of all ages
and lifestyles."
At the Planning Commission meeting on April 10, 2001, the Commissioners requested a number of items be
reviewed before the Finnegan and Murphy petitions were reviewed by the Commission. The following are
issues that the Commission requested further discussion on:
1. Water Table
2. Surface Water
3. Transportation System
4. Sanitary Sewer
Water Table
Staff will provide a.map from March 1, 1994 prepared by Hoisington, Koegler Group, Inc. showing the high
water table (0 to 4 feet below the ground level) in the City at that time. This map indicates that the
FinneganlMurphy/Murphy area was within the mapped area that showed that the properties had a water table
between 0 to 4 feet below the ground level.
Surface Water
Erik Peters of Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates will be at the May 8, 2001 meeting to discuss the
1997 Surface Water Management Plan and any information pertaining to the FinneganlMurphy/Murphy area.
Transportation System
Shelly Johnson of Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates has recently prepared traffic scenario studies of
the FinneganIMurphy/Murphy area and region to begin discussions concerning possible traffic circulation
patterns in this area. The attached memo from Shelly Johnson indicates that further detailed analysis will be
required to determine the most feasible scenario and an update to the 2020 Thoroughfare Plan based on the
approved scenario would be required.
Sanitary Sewer
Engineers at Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates have indicated that a gravity sanitary sewer could serve
the FinneganIMurphy/Murphy area. However, further information from the Metropolitan Council needs to be
acquired and verified to determine the depths of the Apple Valley interceptor to ensure an adequate design of
the system.
Options
The following are possible scenarios for the Planning Commission to consider in reviewing the requested for
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone change for the FinneganlMurphy/Murphy properties.
Option 1
The Planning Commission approves the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zone change and
recommends approval to the City Council.
Option 2
The Planning Commission determines that City initiated updates to the City's Comprehensive Thoroughfare
Plan, Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, Comprehensive Water Plan and Surface Water Management Plan
are needed before these requested amendments to the 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Plan are approved.
Therefore, the request for Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendments and Zone changes would be denied for
the properties at this time and forward this recommendation to the City Council. Additionally, the Planning
Commission would forward a recommendation to the City Council to direct staff to begin preparing
performance standards and codes for the Restricted Development area to be integrated into the Zoning Code
Update.
2
Option 3
The Planning Commission forwards this requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone change with no
recommendation to the City Council and requests that a joint workshop be scheduled to discuss the issue
further.
ACTION REOUESTED
The Commission may wish to recommend approval of one of the above options or propose a different option
and forward this recommendation to the City Council.
Respectfully Submitte
~
Lee Smick, AICP
Planning Coordinator
cc: Roxy Maxa
Reid Hansen, Hansen, McCann & O'Connor, P.A.
Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation
Bernard Murphy
Molly Murphy
3
Memorandum
TO:
Lee Smick
Planning Coordinator
FROM:
Shelly Johnson
DATE:
May 3~ 2001
RE:
Thoroughfare Planning - Area East of Akin Road
North of208th Street .
Our File No. 141-99-101
With the advent of potential property development of that is being called the Finnegan and
Murphy properties~ in conjunction with the proposed Riverbend and Meadow Creek residential
development~ it becomes apparent that the thorough fare plan for this area needs to be revisited
as a need for some collector roadways has become evident.
The beginning phase of this process is the provision of some alternative functional classification
planning for this area. We have created three alternatives for review by appropriate city staff.
These alternatives have certain elements that can be "pulled" from one and "inserted" on
another. In all cases, we are only showing new minor collectors and the major collectors remain
as shown on the existing thoroughfare plan. Weare requesting review and input regarding these
alternatives so that the process can allow for preferred alternative to be recommended.
The attached three alternatives have differences and that is the intent. Basically~ we are looking
at providing three new minor collector connections to the 195th Street corridor east of Akin
Road. It is desirable to have two minor collector connections to Akin Road. It will be desirable
to have 18th from CSAH 31 to the new developments act as a minor collector. It will be
desirable to provide a minor collector from 208th Street northedy to the properties of Finnegan
and Murphy. There are a variety of alternatives to review. We look forward to receiving initial
comments so that we can begin to come closer to a preferred alternative that can be discussed
with appropriate city commissions and the City Council. We expect that a number of working
sessions will be required in order to receive input and to discuss concepts.
/
/
/
Farmington 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update
Strategies
* Provide for the development of a City Arts and Cultural center downtown.
* Promote and provide for the location of art, entertainment and cultural activities
in downtown.
* The downtown streetscape plan should artistically express a cultural, or historic
theme that is integrated into Third Street's design standards and articulated
through its building facades, signage, street lighting, street furniture, landscaping,
public art and other public improvements. Create an aesthetically pleasing
downtown environment.
* Provide for the establishment of a variety of art and cultural organizations in
downtown.
* Promote and support public art throughout downtown and along the riverfront.
Hold community contests and sponsor commissions.
* Promote and support downtown arts and cultural festivals/events.
* Require public art as part of new downtown commercial developments.
5. It is the policy of the City of Farmington to create new parks: a 'Farmington
Community Green" connecting the northern and southern sections of the City, new
mini- and neighborhood parks.
Strategies
* Create a Farmington "community green" in the central district of the City where
the City's natural assets can beautifully converge and connect the northern,
western and greater downtown areas of the City. The community green will be a
nature-influenced, activity node where natural, residential and recreational uses
dramatically combine to provide distinctive residential opportunities, a variety of
active and passive recreational opportunities and a unique community gathering
place. This "community green" is predominantly natural. It will reflect
conservation of the City's natural assets, while providing sensitive design of
residential uses and opportunities for recreational uses by residents of all ages and
lifesty les.
* Create this community green to be an exciting convergence of complementary
land uses consisting of the following:
1. a high quality, market rate and high end, golf course/open space residential
community where nature and housing are harmoniously woven through:
2. the hub of an extensive multi-user, "green" trail system linking all parts of the
City through the environmentally sensitive areas and the river corridor;
3. a focal point of either a small lake with a community center, or a" golf
course/open space conservation area with a community center; surrounded by
well-designed, high amenity housing;
4. active recreation opportunities-soccer, play fields and passive open spaces.
* Establish new mini-parks and neighborhood parks in the Northeast, North Central
and Central Districts that will support all new residential developments.
18
Land Use Element
en
(])
t
(])
c...
o
~
0....
(])
c
o
N
(])
0::
-0
(])
en
I
L.
o
~
0....
'+-
o
c...
CO
~
C
o
--
.......,
CO
o
o
---I
~
.c
0..
~
::Jf
~ ('.-
~
! '<.,1
~ 'W
; h;!
~ i~
r~~...,',..
~ ..
~~{.~
j
t i::'a.
~E c >. CIl CIl
o a.CIl >.'--g:2:
'- '- OJ.!: CIl:J_
0... :J ~ e--g 0 ~
aJ :2: C :J :J CO ro
6"2Li::2:0<(0...
[;3C1laJ~~(/)>.
o:::E>o_:J~
-aJC3:2:0:2:u
<.lCO .,
~">";>) ;>
~ " '"
OJ
z.~
?<
C/)
Q)
~t
() Q)
'C c..
+-'0
C/) s-
OD...
C)Q)
c c
._ 0
C N
o Q)
NO::
c"'O
o Q)
+-'C/)
C2'0
_ c..
~ e
roD...
LL'+-
,+-0
o c
~o
~~
U~
o
-.J
UJ
z.~
~
"'C
C ~ C
Q) -i:! '"
0> '" ~ K
Q) ~ ~~ E ~ 0
....J <Ill!ll!l~o .5 ~
~Q)Q)~() ~ Q)
~ ~o..-~.~ ~-g'2 ~~~~ ~
~~ !!~~~O~ "'o~~~~
roc 2~mm~tro~~OE~>C~~
~5 S3~~mB~~-E~~~~~~~
5m~~~j~~~.~~~~~~E~8
m~i~~~",~i~g-g~=~O~O~
>~____~~ZO_O",~_i~~'"
8~O~~~~~;~~~~~~3~9~
,..... g><e.. <em. mce ' ,~",,,,_O-_;;s~
. ,_ U1III"fn m 0 ~ LL ' ~ ~ ~ '" '"
<,~.H u:111~II[lDIID c( c( "J
Q.LO
co .
:EM
M
.... -
o CO
.- L..
L.. ....
.... C
t/)
.- Q)
CU
c
ro
a..
0)
C/)
:J
"'C
C
ro
-l
o
N
o
N
'"
'" OJ
-g 4:
'" "0
:;::; (tl (1)
~e~
E ~ ~
"m ~ ~
~.Q5
'1:J ~ ~ .S
C n. 0 c:-
O) "8s~
0) .QE3
0) u..;oS ~ C
--l d>c:--o~ C>. Q,)Q)
E~C(/} Q)~ ~EQ)
~~c~:=J ~~ gc.g-~
cac5a>"OQ) Q)C1>>' ..o(/)a.;Cl..
~-g Q) m s: ~ ~ -c ~ 0 ~ ~ g > CJ)
"'C ::J (/) C c: ...J CD co >- E C >-._ 0. OJ C
c:: 0 ~"(ij 'co Q,):g _ a.. .~ .2 ~ ~ E 0 0 8-
g~S~~'~OC~.~~iiE~~~jO
mCJ)i"'C"'Ccc~~~o~~O~(tl.~~
g::J Egg ~ ~ "en ~ "00 ~ ~ :0 .c ~ ';.. ~ ~ ~
~..{g ii: u: ~::; a5 E a5 .3 .3 ~ :E ~ (5 ~ ~ ~
<,~ 0 ~ DII~DDIIIIIDD
Q;
"
u..
0
0
0
N
W
~*~ 0
0
0) ~
ro
u
(f)
~ 0
...,"
.:.If":~,...
;: . ~ !.
.~. . X'
- -
:;~, ",,-.,o;..,.,~$
'"
>-
>-z
"OW
zz:>
zolJJ
z~O:
<<:J:J
~O'"
o.J:<<
15~~
~z>-
~~~
~~UJ
:>00:
~~~
':":oUJ
wo.'"
>-o::J
O:JW
zo.<D
o
o
o
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
fOe,
FROM:
Mayor and Councilmembers ^~
Interim City Administrator ~'
David L. Olson
Community Development Director
TO:
SUBJECT:
Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment - David Finnegan Property
DATE:
May 21, 2001
INTRODUCTION
David Finnegan has petitioned the City to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan for a
parcel he current~ owns east of Akin Road and adjacent to south side of the future
alignment of 195 Street that contains 88.5 acres from Restricted Development to Low
Density Residential.
DISCUSSION
The original petition filed by David Finnegan requested both a Comprehensive Plan Amendment
from Restricted Development to Low Density Residential and a Rezoning from C-l
(Conservation) to R-1 (Low Density Residential).
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on these petitions on April 10th, 2001 and
continued the public hearing to May Sth, 2001 in order to receive additional information. Upon
closing the public hearing on May Sth, the Planning Commission voted to deny the requested
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change at this time on the basis that the City's
Thoroughfare Plan, Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, Comprehensive Water Plan and
Surface Water Plan need to be updated prior to considering amending the Comprehensive Land
Use Plan to allow residential development in this area. This recommendation passed on a 3-0
vote.
Since the Planning Commission recommendation was made, Mr. Finnegan's attorney has
indicated Mr. Finnegan would consider amending his petition to withdraw the rezoning request
portion of the petition. This requested amendment had not been submitted in writing at the time
this memo was prepared. Removal of the rezoning portion of the petition would allow the City
additional time to consider a Comprehensive Plan amendment and not be bound by the statutory
time frame for a decision to be made within 120 days as specified in Minnesota Statutes for
rezoning requests.
The Comprehensive Plan makes specific reference to this area as a "community green" that will
connect the northern and southern sections of the City in Land Use Policy and Strategy #S on
page 18 of the Comprehensive Plan (copy enclosed). This land use strategy intended that the
"community green" be a "nature influenced activity node where natural, residential and
recreational uses dramatically combine to provide distinctive residential opportunities, a variety
of active and passive recreational opportunities and a unique community gathering place." Since
this strategy was still conceptual~ the Land Use Designation of Restricted Development was
designated for area until this concept became more refined.
Since the completion of the Comprehensive Plan almost two years ago, several potential aspects
of the "community green" have evolved somewhat. The idea of one larger man-made lake has
evolved into a chain-of-Iakes concept that may result in a linear series of smaller lakes and/or
ponds that began in Autumn Glen and could possibly extend to the northerly City limits east of
Dakota Estates and south to the main branch of the Vermillion River.
The other potential aspect of the "community green" was to include a City developed park and
ball field complex south of 19Sth Street in this area. The Park and Recreation Commission has
recently determined that their preferred location of this facility would be on the north side of
19Sth Street possibly in the Seed-Genstar Orderly Annexation area.
If the Council wishes to pursue a possible Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Mr. Finnegan's
property, it should indicate this by referring the matter back to the Planning Commission for
further study which would include updating the Thoroughfare~ Sewer~ Water~ and Surfacewater
Plans. It is anticipated that this additional study would take up to twelve months to complete.
The Council may also request the scheduling of a joint workshop with the Planning Commission
to discuss the issue further prior to further study of a possible Comprehensive Plan amendment.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council may consider the following options:
I) Deny the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment (and Rezoning) at this time and
indicate whether it wishes to initiate further study and the necessary updates of the
Thoroughfare, Sewer, Water, And Surfacewater Plans in order to consider a possible
Comprehensive Plan Amendment in the future.
2) Deny the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment (and Rezoning) and indicate that no
further study be completed at this time.
Council should also indicate whether a Joint Workshop with Planning Commission on this issue
is desired.
R~~ctfullYS?- f
David L. Olson
Community Development Director
cc: David Finnegan
Reid Hansen
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
IOe
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
Interim City Administrator
FROM: David L. Olson
Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezoning Petition - David Finnegan
DATE: May 17,2001
Attached please find a copy of the letter received from Mr. Finnegan's attorney indicating
that the rezoning portion of the petition is withdrawn. This letter was received after the
agenda was copied and is being forwarded under separate cover.
~~
David L. Olson
Community Development Director
l
FROM: HANSEN McCANN & O'CONNOR PA FAX NO. : 6514231157
Ma~. 17 2001 02:23PM P2/2
HANSEN, MCCANN & O'CONNOR, P.A.
,\ JlROJ'ESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Al'l'ORNEYS AT L,\w
UAKOT4 CENTRAL OF"JlICF,S
144SO SOUTH RORJtRT TRAIL
RO~F.MOUNT. MINNJ!.S()TA S~
RtlU J. HANSEN
MICHAI!L C. McCANN
R1CHAltU L. O'CONNOR
TJ:LlPHONt: (651) 42.1.1 \55
FAX: <'SII4tJ.1157
i7 /~200/
Uf7 t* t..
~~N
;:Z.- ~~ ~?~ ~ k77 (?t-k.
V~ ft. /)c.JC/~
v( ~ ~~ -{01 /~ ~
~ wd/. ~476 -de ~- ~ .
Dtu.0tkrjj~7;:; . ~ ~
;;1:7~ ~/ ~;1J;; ~
JU~ ~~. JJ~
~Jti~ :1~~~~.
T~J~i~11 ~ ~j~
I
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/ lev
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Flagstaff Avenue Update
DATE: May 21,2001
INTRODUCTION
At the April 2nd, 2001 City Council Meeting, staff provided Council with options for improving the
conditions on Flagstaff A venue. At that meeting, staff was directed by Council to prepare a report
describing the feasibility of improving Flagstaff A venue by adding additional material (gravel) to the
roadway and performing some ditch work. This memo describes the work to be performed along
with estimated costs.
DISCUSSION
History
At the November 6, 2000 City Council meeting, a petition was forwarded to the City Council
requesting improvements to Flagstaff Avenue. On January 25th, a neighborhood meeting was held to
allow residents and petitioners the opportunity to voice their concerns regarding the road.
Generally the comments received were as follows:
. The quality of the road is unacceptable & dangerous
. The City should maintain the road at a higher level
. Put morel higher quality gravel on the road than has previously been used
. Make repairs to Flagstaff A venue that are more permanent
As has been identified in past discussions, the issues brought forward by the residents are, for the
most part, caused by the existing physical characteristics of the road. There are unsuitable soils under
the gravel surface, which retain water and cause deterioration to the surface, especially in the spring
as the frost comes out. The lack of ditches in many areas inhibits drainage of water from the road,
which amplifies the problems caused by the poor soils.
Current Maintenance Efforts
For Council's information in review of this issue, the following summarizes current maintenance
efforts and costs. The City currently grades Flagstaff A venue, on average, slightly more than once a
week. In 2000, Flagstaff was graded on 43 different days, relating to staff and equipment costs of
$18,000. Also, on average, approximately $6000 per year is expended on additional gravel on
Flagstaff between CSAH 50 and the City's border to the north. In 1998, a small test area was
excavated to remove and replace unsuitable soils costing $6,000, which included rental of a backhoe,
staff and equipment time.
Option Description
The improvement option requested by Council for staff study is summarized as follows:
Geotextile Fabric and Class 5 Crushed Limestone
This options includes the installation of geotextile fabric covered by 8" of Class 5 100%
crushed limestone watered and rolled. The existing fabric that was placed in the early 90's
can no longer perform as originally intended. The geotextile fabric will be applied in two
rows of 18' wide rolls overlapping each other 3' for a total fabric width of30'. The purpose
of the fabric is to bridge the existing unsuitable soils to minimize the effects of frost heaving.
A 34' wide, 8" layer of Class 5 100% crushed limestone will then be added over the fabric,
watered with a water truck to optimum water content, and rolled to achieve maximum density.
In order to maintain a consistent 8" layer of Class 5 and keep the geotextile fabric from being
exposed, additional gravel will need to be added approximately every other year, or as
needed.
Ditch Excavation and Driveway Culverts
Many areas along Flagstaff Avenue have inadequate ditches or no ditches. Water stands
adjacent to and on the road, saturating the road surface and subgrade, further contributing to
frost heaving and road deterioration. Most of the driveways along Flagstaff Avenue have no
driveway culverts and therefore trap water in many areas. Staff proposes to excavate material
to create ditches at selected areas, and to add culverts to the driveways that need them, to
allow water to adequately drain away from Flagstaff Avenue.
BUDGET IMPACT
Cost estimates have been prepared for the improvements described above. The estimates for the
work are based on anticipated unit prices for the 2001 construction season.
Estimated Project Costs
Item
Est.
Unit Est. Qty Unit Price Total
Ton 27,116 $9.65 $261.669
SY 65,252 $0.90 $58,727
CY 1,636 $9.00 $14,724
LF 1.542 $15.00 $23,130
Estimated Construction Cost $358,250
10% Contingencies $35.825
Total Estimated Construction Cost $394.075
27% Engineering, Legal, Administration $106,400
Total Estimated Project Cost $500,476
8" Class 5 100% Crushed Limestone Installed
Type V Geotextile Fabric Installed
Common Excavation
Culvert Installation
ACTION REOUESTED
Council review of the information presented. Direction to staff regarding Council's desired course of
action.
Respectfully submitted,
~)r;~
Lee M. Mann, P .E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
Flagstaff Avenue Residents
~mootn ~eed Sheets™
Use template for 5160(!)
Ronald & Diana Valek
20630 Flagstaff Avenue S
lington, MN 55024
David J & Shaun Ames
20982 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Bernard Murphy
6730 Lakeville Blvd
Lakeville, MN 55044
Jay & Patricia Christensen
20861 Flagstaff Avenue W
Farmington, MN 55024
David & Ute Christopherson
, 20993 Flagstaff Avenue W
Farmington, MN 55024
Jerry & Evelyn Sayers
6886 Lakeville Blvd
Lakeville, MN 55044
Rus Norden
8635 206th Street W
Lakeville, MN 55044
John Devney
5788 21ih Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
Bob McNearney
19356 Evening Star Way
Farmington, MN 55024
Karen Donnelly
19224 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Brian Donnelly
19224 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Adam Donnelly
18679 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Ryan Donnelly
18679 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Terry Donnelly
18679 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Debbie Donnelly
18679 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Patrick & Darlene Donnelly
20491 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Cathy Donnelly
6611 200th Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
Dave Donnelly
6611 200th Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
Ben Ward
6378 195th Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
Bob & Bernice Jensen
17995 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Jim McNearny
20281 Hamburg Avenue
Lakeville, MN 55044
Louie & Jean Juenke
3080 220th Street E
Farmington, MN 55024
Judy & Chuck Bryant
5606 Upper 183rd Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
June M. Raymond
421 Spruce Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Mark & Terrie Schmidt
18672 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Mary A Devney
5788 212th Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
Robert J Jr. Donnelly
Donnelly Farms
20080 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
.Lwger & Karla Duff
6567 190th Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
Terrence & Deborah Donnelly
18679 Flagstaff Avenue W
Farmington, MN 55024
David L Teske
6660 190th Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
8AVERY@
Address labels
Laser
5160@
::>>mootn teed Sheets™
Matthew Q & Jill Ocel
1 Q'Z 15 Flagstaff Avenue
nington, MN 55024
Anthony J & Michelle Joslyn
19713 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Douglas P & Jannelle Malszycki
19585 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Helen M Nordseth
PO Box 95
Farmington, MN 55024
John T & Alexis Glynn
20850 Flagstaff Avenue W
Farmington, MN 55024
Marlo V & Connie A Dahl
20520 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
flAVERY@
Address labels
Use template for 51601!)
David E Donnelly
6611 200th Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
Mildred Pelach
19867 Flagstaff Avenue W
Farmington, MN 55024
Richard D Teske
6670 190th Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
Donald W & Cheryl A lfaan
19395 Flagstaff Avenue W
Farmington, MN 55024
Richard & Mary Lou Nordling
7029 190th Street W
Farmington, MN 55024
Matthew Q Ocel
19215 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Robert Sayers
822 MacBeth Circle
Farmington, MN 55024
Elayne Donnelly
20080 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Gerald C & Teresa A Gregory
20940 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Allen J Braun
20970 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
Darcy A & Pamela J Zehnder
20602 Flagstaff Avenue
Farmington, MN 55024
John S Tschohl
4650 Nine Oaks Circle
Minneapolis, MN 55437
Laser
5160@
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
Itl~
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator W
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution - Third Street Overlay and Sanitary Sewer Sliplining Feasibility
Report
DATE: May 21,2001
INTRODUCTION
Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report for the Third Street Overlay and Sanitary Sewer Slip lining
Project.
DISCUSSION
The report has been prepared to determine the feasibility constructing improvements that would
address the deteriorated street and sanitary sewer along Third Street. The improvements proposed
would consist of constructing a bituminous overlay and sliplining the sanitary sewer along Third
Street from Spruce Street to Ash Street.
BUDGET IMPACT
A summary of the estimated costs for the proposed improvements is presented below. The costs
presented include 10% for contingencies and 27% for engineering, legal and administration.
Total
Estimated Pro. ect Cost
$ 184,800.00
$ 213,600.00
$ 14,600.00
$ 413 000.00
1m rovement
2" Mill and Overla
Miscellaneous Pro' ect Costs
In accordance with the City's assessment policy, 65% of the project costs would be paid for by the
City and 35% of the project costs would be assessed to the benefited properties. The City's share of
the costs would be funded from the Road and Bridge Fund and the Sanitary Sewer Fund. The table
below outlines the allocation of project costs.
Item City Assessed Total
Bituminous Overlay $120,100 $64,700 $184,800
Sanitary Sewer Slipline $138,900 $74,700 $213,600
Miscellaneous Costs $9,500 $5,100 $14,600
Total $268,500 $144,500 $413,000
ACTION REOUESTED
Adopt the attached resolution accepting the feasibility report, authorizing the preparation of plans and
specifications and scheduling a public hearing for July 2,2001.
Respectfully Submitted,
~ /Yi~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
RESOLUTION NO. R -01
ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT, AUTHORIZING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
PROJECT 01-09
THIRD STREET OVERLAY & SANITARY SEWER SLIPLINING
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington,
Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 st day of May, 2001 at 7 :00 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following resolution:
WHEREAS, pursuant to approval of the 2001 Capital Improvement Plan by the Council, a report has been
prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the following improvement;
Proiect No.
01-09
Description
Bituminous Overlay and Sanitary Sewer
Sliplining
Location
Third Street from Ash Street to Spruce
Street
;and
WHEREAS, this report was received by the Council on May 21, 200 I; and,
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-
effective, and feasible.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The feasibility report is hereby accepted. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets and
sanitary sewer in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of
the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of
improvement of $413,000.
2. Lee M. Mann is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and
specifications for the making of such improvement.
3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 2nd day of July, 2001, in the Council
Chambers at 7:00 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and
improvement as required by law.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21st day of
May, 200 I.
Mayor
Attested to the 21st day of May, 2001.
City Administrator
SEAL
FEASIBILITY STUDY
FOR
THIRD STREET OVERLAY AND
SANITARY SEWER SLIPLINING
CITY PROJECT NO. 01-09
May 21, 2001
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly registered professional engineer under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
~m~
Lee M. Mann, P.E., City Engineer/Public Works Director
Date: May 21, 2001
Reg. No.: 24541
City of Farmington, Minnesota
Engineering Department
325 Oak Street
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
1.
Introduction
2.
Discussion
2.
Cost Estimates
4.
Project Financing
5.
Conclusions and Recommendations
6.
Appendix
Figure 1 - Site Plan
Figure 2 - Sanitary Sewer Slip lining Limits
Figure 3 - Milling and Overlaying limits
Cost Estimates
American Engineering Testing Reports
Third Street Overlay and Sanitary Sewer Sliplining
Introduction
This report has been prepared to determine the feasibility of overlaying Third Street from Spruce
Street to Ash Street and sliplining the sanitary sewer in Third Street (See project area on Figure
1). Third Street currently exists as a paved urban section with concrete curb and gutter on both
sides of the street. Storm sewer currently exists north of the intersection of Third Street and
Maple Street within the proposed project area. The residents along Third Street are connected to
City sanitary sewer and water service. This report describes improvements that would address
the deteriorated street and sanitary sewer along Third Street. The proposed improvements are
shown on Figures 2 and 3. Estimated costs and proposed financing for the proposed
improvements are presented in this report.
Discussion
Background
Third Street is located north of Ash Street and south of Pine Street in the southern part of
Farmington as shown on Figure 1. Prior to the 1960's Third Street was part of State Highway
218 which was later realigned to what is currently State Highway 3. State highway 218 existed
as a concrete section highway which has been overlayed with bituminous pavement since being
turned over to the City as Third Street. Third Street received a bituminous overlay from Elm
Street to Spruce Street in 2000 as part ofthe Downtown Streetscape and Street Lighting Project.
Street Improvements
The existing roadway surface has many deteriorated areas (potholes, cracks and an uneven
driving surface). Over time, these problems have been temporarily addressed through City
maintenance programs. The existing curb and gutter is in relatively good condition with only
minor repairs needed.
A testing firm recently performed core drills at twelve locations along the roadway to determine
the existing pavement section and the condition of the section (See appendix). The results
indicated that much of the existing bituminous subsurface has deteriorated and become brittle.
In addition, the concrete street section under the bituminous has become fractured and the soils
under the concrete are not desirable in nature.
Milling and overlaying the street with the conditions that currently exist would extend the life of
the pavement for approximately another ten years at which point the pavement would most likely
need to be re-evaluated. The cracking that is currently observed on the roadway will eventually
reflect through the newly placed surface. The cracks would be routed and sealed as part of the
City's yearly maintenance program and the entire street would be seal coated in two or three
years. A concrete valley gutter is proposed to be constructed at the intersection of Third Street
and Hickory Street in order to improve the drainage at this location. The installation of sidewalk
pedestrian ramps is proposed to achieve compliance with State requirements for handicap
accessi bili ty .
Third Street Overlay and Sanitary Sewer Sliplining
2
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
The existing sanitary sewer within the project area is in need of rehabilitation or replacement.
The sanitary sewer was televised in 1998 and found to have various structural problems,
settlement areas and visible signs of significant infiltration. The existing sanitary sewer is 8"
vitrified clay pipe (VCP).
The 1998 inspection found numerous cracked and displaced pipe joints. Two of the six
manholes have been rehabilitated previously, and two are in need of repairs. The majority of
sewer service connections were found to be in good structural condition, with one service
connection found that protrudes into the main sewer pipe.
Cured-In-Place-Pipe (CIPP) lining is the proposed method of reconstruction and rehabilitation of
the sanitary sewer pipes. A CIPP lining will provide a full structural rehabilitation and
seals/eliminates all existing sewer main pipe joints. Sewer services can be reopened internally
shortly after the liner has cured and protruding sewer services can be internally repaired without
excavation. This improvement will significantly reduce infiltration in this pipe, which can cost
the City in increased fees to the Met Council for sewer treatment. Also, sealing the joints
eliminates root infestation, thus reducing the risk of backups. The sewer main will have an
approximate life of75 years after completion of this procedure.
Manhole problems can be repaired with limited surface disruption or excavation. Open cuts
areas near manholes will be required to repair settled areas.
Third Street Overlay and Sanitary Sewer Sliplining
3
Cost Estimates
The project costs for these improvements are outlined in this section. The itemized cost
estimates are provided in the appendix. Cost estimates for this report are based on 2001
construction costs and can be related to the May, 2001 ENR Construction Cost Index of 6288.
The total estimated costs for this project is $ 406,000.00. A summary of the estimated costs for
the proposed improvements is presented below. The costs presented include 10% for
contingencies and 27% for engineering, legal and administration.
Estimated Project Costs
Improvement Estimated Project Cost
2" Mill and Overlay $ 184,800.00
Sanitary Sewer Sliplining $ 213,600.00
Miscellaneous Project Costs $ 14,600.00
Total $ 413,000.00
Third Street Overlay and Sanitary Sewer Sliplining
4
Project Financing
The estimated project costs are outlined on Page 10 of this report. The estimates include 10% for
contingencies and 27% for engineering, legal and administration. The itemized cost estimates
are included in the appendix.
In accordance with the City's assessment policy, 65% of the project costs would be paid for by
the City and 35% of the project costs would be assessed to the benefited properties. The City's
share of the costs would be funded from the Road and Bridge Fund and the Sanitary Sewer Fund.
The table below outlines the allocation of project costs.
Item City Assessed Total
Bituminous Overlay $120,100 $64,700 $184,800
Sanitary Sewer Slipline $138,900 $74,700 $213,600
Miscellaneous Costs $9,500 $5,100 $14,600
Total $268,500 $144,500 $413,000
Third Street Overlay and Sanitary Sewer Sliplining
5
Conclusion and Recommendations
The proposed improvements described in this report are feasible and cost-effective as they relate
to general engineering principles and construction procedures. The improvements are necessary
to repair the deterioration of the street and sanitary sewer main. The feasibility of the project as
a whole is subject to financial review. Based on the information contained in the report, it is
recommended that:
1. The City of Farmington accept this report as a guide for the Third Street Overlay and
Sanitary Sewer Sliplining Improvements;
2. The City conduct a legal and financial review of the proposed project prior to the public
hearing;
3. A Public hearing be held as required by Minnesota Statue 429. The property owners adjacent
to Third Street within the project area should be notified for hearing purposes;
4. A neighborhood meeting be scheduled with the affected property owners;
5. The following tentative schedule be implemented for the project:
Accept Preliminary Report, Authorize preparation of Plans May 21, 2001
and Specifications, Schedule the Public Hearing
Hold Neighborhood Meeting Week of June 11,2001
Hold Public Hearing, Order Project, Approve Plans and July 2, 2001
Specifications, Authorize Advertisement for Bids
Receive Bids August 2, 2001
Accept Bids and A ward Contract August 6, 2001
Start Construction August 20, 2001
Complete Construction October 19,2001
Hold Assessment Hearing Spring 2002
Third Street Overlay and Sanitary Sewer Sliplining
6
APPENDIX
..
~
'::
CAStce Av(1iIJ(
'"
~
%
0:
...
!::l
[uR[KA TOlolNS~
CASTL[ ~OCK TOlol
Ie...... AVCn:1AH JI
N ~ .
~
~
i
lr
~
~
n
.
!::l
...
;; ...
;;0 Q R
~~~ "
BUlO i
bO'" %
z>.., ;;
. ^>
;::Vl;;o
Z-';::
;;oz
Ul"'G)
Ul"'-'
0-'0
I\J Z
~
REVISIONS
~ U n
,.,
AJ f--i
0 D -l
,., -<
Vl L
n
:ll
1i I'l
...
6 I
z n
C'lon 0 -l J>
z ~ ~i!\ [il I
0 "U ::e n -
Vl ;!; z '" ~ I
n "',., I
n ~ ~i ~
,.
r- D
,.,
,.,
~ n
,., J>
~ -l
:!( n
- f--i
-l D
-<
Vl Z
:I: 0
,.,
,.,
... 'l
I~ -.
..,Vl;!:
0 -=i;;O
.., g",o 'l
I~ ;;o1JVl )>
Vl "'s;:;ti ::::0
:I:
,., -z~ ~
,.,
... -.
Vl -
"U Z
::0 G)
0
'-
,., -l
n
... 0
z
p Z
~
I
0
lD
z
~ ~
Vlr zor
rrlO rrlCO
:EO :E-lO
rrl:P :p
::o::! s::;:o::!
0 :prrlO
VlZ Z-OZ
r :p
=00 I;UO
N r ., o ., N
~Vl M:P
ZO I
I Z:P 0-0
C}Z rrl
:::::j Z
:p
::0
-<
MAPLE STREET
I
I
SPRUCE STREET
I
[J
0
..,
:l> ()
::u _
~~p
~lJIo
(jo'"
z:l>..,
. ^:l>
3::(/)::0
Z-l3::
::Uz
lJIfTlC)
lJIfTl-l
0-10
N Z
~
REVISIONS
[~~~ ~
j? ~ R C'i
o~ ~; ~
,.,
~
-<
,.,
I~
~
()
---'l
-<
(/)
Vl :l>
:J: Z
~ ~ 0
j: ~:r '1
o ~ (/);0
"T1 C'>fTlO '1
1- ~ ~ (/) )>
Vl fTl::tJ;tj -n
:J: NVlfTl /V
~ rfTl ~
-< =u -I ::::::...
Vl ,....
Z Z
~ C)
-l
o
Z
"tl
~
o
L
,.,
(")
-<
z
!=>
o
I
o
<D
-l
::r::
;0
o
(J)
-l
::::0
rrl
rrl
-l
o
cf2J
DD
~
-<
,.,
o
,.,
Vl
(")
;0
'li
-<
5
z
o
u
o
D
CJ
ASH STREET
I
I
WALNUT SliREET
I
I
MAP LE STIR E ET
I
..,
)> ()
::0 _
~~~
~(}10
-10",
~)>..,
. ^)>
;::Vl~
Z-l-
::Oz
(}1MC')
(}1':l(j
2 z
~
REVISIONS
[~~ ~ ~
:I:::e '" (;)
- Z f'TI z
n 0 8
J:~ ~
o
)>
....
f'TI
~ :
~ -<
-0 ~ I
f'Tl
0 )>r s:
zo r
;;0 on r
)> )>
s: o:j )>
-0 <0 Z
f'Tlz 0
,,--.,. ;;0
-j ~o 0
-<
-0 -<" <
......... f'Tl
s: ;;0
r ~
r
o
)>
....
f'TI
MAPLE STREET
[]
o
DC:!
o
f'TI
Vl
n
;>J
'li
....
5
z
o
Vl
ifi ~ 0
':: ;:: -I '1
I~ ;=::r:
..,r-
~ o)>~ '1
Cz )>
I~ ::0 OVl
M -I
~ c...O~ :::0
~ ~':l $:
Vl ::0 _
~ Z
l;g C)
e --l
a 0 ASH STREET
~ z
o
I
o
'"
Appendix
City of Farmington
Third Street Overlay and
Sanitary Sewer Sliplining
File Number 141-01-148
Preliminary Cost Estimates for 2" Mill and Overlay
Item Unit Est. Quantity Unit Price Est. Cost
Mobilization LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
Traffic Control LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
Remove & Replace Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 600 $ 16.50 $ 9,900.00
Mill Bituminous Surface (2") SY 14400 $ 2.10 $ 30,240.00
4' Concrete Valley Gutter SF 350 $ 7.00 $ 2,450.00
Concrete Ped Ramp EA 23 $ 300.00 $ 6,900.00
Bituminous Tack Coat GAL 720 $ 1.20 $ 864.00
Type 41, Bituminous Wear TN 1600 $ 38.00 $ 60,800.00
Adjust Gate Valve EA 8 $ 200.00 $ 1,600.00
Adjust Manhole EA 15 $ 300.00 $ 4,500.00
Estimated Construction Cost $ 132,254
10% Contingency $ 13,225
Subtotal $ 145,479
27% Eng., Legal & Admin. $ 39,279
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 184,759
Appendix
City of Farmington
Third Street Overlay and
Sanitary Sewer Sliplining
File Number 141-01-148
Preliminary Cost Estimates for Slipline Sanitary Sewers
Item Unit Est. Quantity
Remove/Replace 4' Dia. Manhole EA 2 $
Class 5 Aggregate (100% crushed) TN 330 $
Type 41 Bituminous Patch TN 220 $
Remove/Replace 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer LF 170 $
Sewer Service Reconnections EA 65 $
CIPP Lining for 8" VCP LF 2500 $
Removal of Protruding Service Connection EA 1 $
Temporary Bypass Sewage Flows LS 1 $
Unit Price
3,000.00
20.00
50.00
30.00
100.00
45.00
200.00
5,000.00
Est. Cost
$ 6,000.00
$ 6,600.00
$ 11,000.00
$ 5,100.00
$ 6,500.00
$ 112,500.00
$ 200.00
$ 5,000.00
Estimated Construction Cost
10% Contingency
Subtotal
27% Eng., Legal & Admin.
Total Estimated Project Cost
$ 152,900.00
$ 15,290.00
$ 168,190.00
$ 45,411.30
$ 213,601.30
.(1
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
CONSULTANTS
. GEOTECHNICAL
. MATERIALS
. ENVIRONMENTAL
REPORT OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURE TESTING
PROJECT:
3111 STREET, ASH ST. TO SPRUCE ST
PAVEMENT CORING
FARMINGTON, MN
REPORTED TO:
CITY OF FARMINGTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
ENGINEERING DMSION
FARMINGTON, MN
ATIN: MATI STORDAHL
AET JOB NO: 20-01090
DATE: MARCH 23. 2001
INTRODUCTION
On MARCH 20, 2001, SIX (6) co re samples of the in-place pavement were obtained by American Engineering Testing, Inc. from the
compacted pavement at the locations indicated below. The scope of our laboratory work was limited to determining lift thickness of the
core samples.
CORE SAMPLE TEST RESULTS
ASTM:D2726
2
3
Sample No:
Sample Location:
sou~f;b~1ane
609 -b3111 Strel et
north ound lane
716 - 3111 Street
center-fine
_ift Thickness, in
Chip Seal
~ - % chip seal
~
Y%-%
Wear
2Y..
2
2
Binder
Base
2\1:
2Y%
2
Bottom
3 Y.. base aggregate
concrete
concrete
4
S 6
90~ - 3111 Smt 1006 - 3111 Street
no boun lane center-hne
~-y.. ~
1~ IY..
3 2
2 2~
concrete concrete
Sample No:
Sample Location:
804 - 3111 Street
center-line
Lift Thickness, in
Chip Seal
Y..
Wear
IY..
Binder
Base
lY..
Bottom
concrete
.AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
550 Cleveland Avenue North - St. Paul, MN 55114 - 651-659-9001- Fax 651-659-1379
Duluth. Mankato. Marshall. Rochester. Wausau . Rapid City. Pierre
.,.,
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
CONSULTANTS
. GEOTECHNICAL
. MATERIALS
. ENVIRONMENTAL
AET #20-00888 - Page 2
REMARKS
1. Wear course thickness includes chip seal thickness.
2. The longitudinal seam can be seen in the cores taken on centerline.
3. Location #2 core material disintegrated below the wear course during coring.
4. All base course layer exhibit brittleness.
Reported By:
E~ikjj~~ /
Donald E. Gehrman
Bituminous Lab Coordinator
'AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
550 Cleveland Avenue North- St. Paul, MN 55114- 651-659-9001- Fax 651-659-1379
Duluth. Mankato. Marshall. Rochester. Wausau . Rapid City. Pierre
.~
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
CONSULTANTS
. GEOTECHNICAL
. MATERIALS
. ENVIRONMENTAL
REPORT OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURE TESTING
lOJECT:
3n1 STREET, ASH ST. TO SPRUCE ST
PAVEMENT CORING
FARMINGTON, MN
REPORTED TO:
CITY OF FARMINGTON
PUBUC WORKS DEPT
ENGINEERING DMSION
FARMINGTON, MN
ATI'N: MATI STORDAHL
AET JOB NO: 20-01090
DATE: APRIL 17,2001
INTRODUCTION
On March 27, 2000, six (6) additional core samples of the in-place pavement were obtained by American Engineering Testing, Inc. from
the compacted pavement at the locations indicated below. The scope of our laboratory work was limited to determining lift thickness of
the core samples, % moisture in subgrade and. identify type of material beneath the curb and gutter.
CORE SAMPLE TEST RESULTS
ASTM:D2726
2
Sample No:
Sample Location: 9~ 3n1 S~et. 1106- 3n1 Street,
no coun ane centerlme
Lift Thickness, in Bituminous 8 5
Concrete 8 7
Base 9 9
su~de 25.4 - 26.4 18.1 - 20.4
% lSture
3
805- 3n1 Street
east curb
5Yz
sand base
4 5 6
Sample No:
Sample Location: 5096W- 3~Street 620 ~treet 3n1 ~t & Maple ~treet
at ey '- comer, cur
Lift Thickness, in Bituminous
Concrete 7 8 9
Base sand base sand base sand base
"AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPlOYER"
550 Cleveland Avenue North. St. Paul, MN 55114 - 651-659-9001- Fax 651-659-1379
Duluth. Mankato. Marshall. Rochester. Wausau . Rapid City. Pierre
~
.~
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
CONSULTANTS
. GEOTECHNICAL
. MATERIALS
. ENVIRONMENTAL
AET #20-0 I 090 - Page 2
REMARKS
1. The sub grade moistures are the values taken at the top and bottom of the 2 foot depth augured.
2. The concrete pavement under the bituminous consistently exhibits horizontal cracking. This is part of the original pavement
structure and is estimated to have been in place over thirty (30) years.
3. Soil classification of soils at core locations # 1 & #2.
I) Sandy lean clay, brown
2) Sandy lean clay, dark gray
4. Both sub grade samples appear to be over optimum.
5. Subgrade samples identifications are limited to two (2) foot depths. Soil borings that go deeper may be considered for
roadway/street reconstruction.
Report Prepared By:
~eJIT ~_
Donald E ~an
Bituminous Lab Coordinator
..
'AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
550 Cleveland Avenue North- St. Paul, MN 55114- 651-659-9001- Fax 651-659-1379
Duluth. Mankato. Marshall. Rochester. Wausau · Rapid City. Pierre
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/;?b
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and Interim City Administrator ~
FROM: Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager
SUBJECT: Set Council Workshop Date/Community Survey
DATE: May 21, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Council had requested staff conduct a Community Survey. Decision Resources was chosen to
conduct the survey to gather the views and opinions of City residents on a wide range of
community topics.
DISCUSSION
The survey has been completed with approximately 400 households being surveyed. Staff would
like to set a Council Workshop date to review the results. The proposed date is Monday, June 4,
2001 at 5:30 p.m. The Workshop will be held in Conference Room A prior to the Council
Meeting.
ACTION REOUESTED
Approve the scheduling ofa Council Workshop for Monday, June 4, 2001 at 5:30 p.m. in City
Hall Conference Room A.
Respectfully submitted,
~ZF~
Karen Finstuen
Administrative Services Manager