Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPaperless Council Meetings 2011 /010- City of Farmington 430 Third Street l'armington, l\.1innesota 651.280.6800. Fax 651.280.6899 w\....w.ci .tanningtlm.n11l.LL'l TO: Mayor, Councilmembers FROM: Kevin Schorzman, City Engineer SUBJECT: Paperless Council Meetings DATE: June 20, 2011 INTRODUCTION At a recent Council workshop, Council expressed a desire to move to a paperless format for meetings. Council also requested that staff research options for providing electronic devices (IPads, notebook computers, etc.) for Council to access electronic copies of the agenda packets during meetings. The following options were discussed: . Establish a "Technology Allowance" that each Councilmember could use to purchase equipment. · Have the City provide the equipment. DISCUSSION Items to consider regarding a "Technology Allowance": 1. Dual use of equipment (public use for Council items, private use as well) blurs the line between public/private information 2. Responsibility for maintenance, repair, and replacement costs. (Will the City or Councilmember be responsible for these items as it is inappropriate for City staff to repair private equipment?) 3. Ifinstituted, should the allowance cover the entire cost, or just a portion of the cost? 4. Raises questions about payment of taxes based on current tax law and IRS regulations Items to consider regarding City provided equipment: 1. Should only be used for official City business 2. Could be maintained, repaired, and replaced by City staff if necessary 3. More clearly dermed line between public and private information 4. No individual tax implications 5. Equipment could be transferred to new Councilmembers when elected and only replaced when necessary 75 Paperless Council Meetings June 20, 2011 Page 2 of2 It is the opinion of both staff and the City Attorney, that Council give strong consideration to having the necessary equipment supplied by the City. BUDGET IMPACT While the budget impact will not be known until the Council provides direction on which option they would like to pursue, the cost of any option would be offset to some degree by reductions in the amount of paper and printing costs, as well as staff time utilized to prepare and distribute paper correspondence. An estimate of these reductions will be provided when this item is brought back for Council action. ACTION REOUESTED For discussion only. Based on Council direction, this item will be brought back to a future Council meeting for action. Respectfully Submitted, Kevin Schorzman City Engineer cc: file 76