HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.13.13 Work Session Minutes Council Workshop Minutes
May 13,2013
Mayor Larson called the workshop to order at 6:30 p.m.
Present: Larson,Bartholomay, Bonar, Donnelly(arrived 6:35 p.m.), Fogarty
Also Present: David McKnight, City Administrator;Robin Hanson, Finance Director;Brian
Lindquist, Police Chief;Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director;Kevin
Schorzman, City Engineer;Todd Reiten, Municipal Services Director;Brenda
Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant
MOTION by Fogarty, second by Bartholomay to approve the agenda. APIF,MOTION
CARRIED.
The purpose of the workshop was to discuss 2013/2014 goals.
Councilmember Bonar stated Council's attempt when setting the goals was to find something
that is specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and timely. He felt the Council was missing
direct feedback from staff. He noticed some gaps and that there was no mention of police and
fire in the goals which represent nearly 50%of the budget. The greatest challenge any Council
or administration has is communication to the people we serve. The basic goal of fire and police
is to protect and serve. He asked Fire Chief Pietsch about public outreach to the community.
Fire Chief Pietsch stated they hold 20—30 community outreach programs through community
events and schools. He has implemented a program called PIER(public information, education
and resources). Firefighters have to earn seven points each year and are based on time frames,
events and how much time they put in. Recruitment of firefighters is becoming a huge issue as
50%of the membership has served five years or less, and 5%has served 20 years or greater. He
is concerned that they are young and inexperienced and also there are several people that could
retire at any time and to fill those positions with someone who has experience is a concern.
Police Chief Lindquist stated they operate 24/7 and public contact is part of the daily routine.
They do not set aside specific time for public outreach as opportunities always exist.
Councilmember Bonar asked Parks and Recreation Director Distad if he has considered doing
virtual tours on the website to show our park amenities. Parks and Recreation Director Distad
stated they do not have virtual tours since that is a technology question about cost. We do
include photos of parks and a list of amenities on the website. There are 21 developed parks.
Councilmember Bartholomay wanted to know what each department foresees for innovative
ideas or large, upcoming costs. He asked if it would be helpful for Council to give a top
percentage for the budget. Staff agreed a percentage would be very helpful. He liked the idea
for the virtual park tours.
City Administrator McKnight stated all department heads have seen the goals and a third of them
are already completed. Their goals are the goals set by Council.
14
Council Workshop Minutes
May 13,2013
Page 2
Mayor Larson asked department heads if there are any questions. Council doesn't know where
the levy will be yet. Are we missing anything? Are there things we have talked about that we
can put off a couple years?
Parks and Recreation Director Distad felt the park and rec items are too vague. He doesn't know
what options Council is looking for as far as the pool. Does it mean a new pool? Replace the
existing pool? Do something with the existing pool? Get rid of the pool? Relocate the pool?
The Parks and Rec Commission has started looking at options, but more direction for them
would be helpful.
The other item is the Rambling River Center and increasing usage. Does that mean 5%, 10%,
100%? Staff needs more direction. Mayor Larson stated since the seniors have moved to the
new location we have talked about having a teen center along with the senior center and it hasn't
gone anywhere. He has heard staffing for teens is the biggest reason. When we talk about
economic development,we talk about doing it realistically. Are we being realistic and can
seniors and teens get along over there? Parks and Recreation Director Distad stated they are
doing teen programs at the senior center and have partnered with the Library. There have been
one to three kids show up and it has been marketed through the Library and the City News and
Recreation Guide. It is a tough group to program for. Mayor Larson asked what would be
needed to make it a teen center. Staff stated it would be nice to have a dedicated facility just for
teens. That doesn't mean we cannot do teen programs there. We will be having a dance with a
DJ at the senior center this summer. Mayor Larson asked if it is realistic to have a senior/teen
center and if so, what will it cost? Parks and Recreation Director Distad stated it does work out
as far as scheduling because seniors leave at 3:30 p.m. and that is when kids are getting out of
school. The kids actively involved in things, don't have a need for a teen center. Kids that are
not actively involved, don't want to be there and want to go somewhere else where they are not
around other adults or have structure. We don't have things that are enticing for them to come.
The computer lab is not large enough to accommodate them and now they have their own Ipads.
Mayor Larson asked when Council says to increase membership,we will not be able to do it
through teens? Parks and Recreation Director Distad stated they are increasing rentals. We are
booked through June for weekend rentals. This puts a crimp in allowing time for teen programs.
Do you want revenue from rentals or do you want programs for teens? Mayor Larson asked if
when we talk about bringing teens over there are we wasting our breath? Staff stated as far as
trying to make the building a teen center, it will not work. Doing teen programs there might be
successful. Councilmember Bonar noted we do an exceptional job providing programs for our
seniors in that building. The school district has a mission providing for the students. The most
under represented group are the people between the teens and the seniors. How do we expand
the use of the Rambling River Center for those that are beyond their teens, but not 55? He asked
if we should add an outdoor element to the building. Is it constrained by its size? Council wants
to use the building to its fullest extent. Parks and Recreation Director Distad stated we would be
getting into Community Ed's area. Mayor Larson suggested that facility may work for some of
their programs.
Mayor Larson noted the pool will close itself eventually. He recalled the survey where residents
did not want a referendum. Parks and Recreation Director Distad noted the 2010 survey showed
15
Council Workshop Minutes
May 13,2013
Page 3
addressing parks and trails as two important items. Mayor Larson felt staff and the Park and Rec
Commission should do the work on options for the pool.
Councilmember Fogarty stated the community wants the pool so we need solutions. We can't
build a waterpark there, so do we want to replace it as is, or do we turn it into a splash pad area.
She wanted options brought to Council and the community before the pool is no longer
workable. Our community is not ready for something larger. Maybe we do want to upgrade it
and keep it as is, but we need to know costs.
Finance Director Hanson noted if we replace the pool, we would need a referendum. To do it in
an even year, we could hold the referendum next year, and put it in the 2015 budget so you
would have the money to build it in 2016. It is not a big window, even if it lasts four or five
years.
Parks and Recreation Director Distad mentioned the rental rates. They have reviewed several
places and rates are all over the board as capacities are different and facilities are different. By
competitive, do you want us at the bottom, middle, or close to the top? Councilmember Fogarty
stated her concern is that she wants the facility used, but wants it to cover its cost. Some of those
facilities are more than covering their costs and therefore discouraging use. It sits empty most
nights and weekends. If it is booked through June,they must not be entered because she is not
seeing it booked. If the community knows its there and it is affordable they will continue to use
it. It sounds like programming for teens will be difficult, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't lean
more towards a community center. She has been getting the feeling for a long time that there are
some territorial problems over there,where no one wants anyone in it except for the seniors
during the day and that is a frustration. She wants the whole community to have access to those
meeting rooms. She wants it to cover its costs. If we are going to open it at night so people can
get in we need to cover janitorial costs and electricity. Sometimes she feels we are pricing
ourselves out deliberately so it's not used. We should not make a huge profit, but that should be
helping cover the cost of the center. If it is rented all the time,we shouldn't have to have line
item budgets for it every year to make sure it breaks even.
Councilmember Bonar stated our competition is emptiness. Councilmember Fogarty agreed and
as long as it is covering costs to have people in there, use it. They are already paying for it
through taxes. It is just like any other facility we have. She wants it used and wants the
community to feel like it is property they can use. It is the seniors' territory during the day
because of their programming. She is talking about nights when it sits empty. She realized we
use meeting rooms some nights,but wants people in there all the time.
Councilmember Bonar asked regarding the pool, has staff and the Park and Rec Commission
considered whatever changes are made, is there a way to make it a 12-month facility. Staff noted
maybe, but it has not been discussed. Councilmember Bonar asked if there would be an
opportunity to foster a pool that would be a public/private venture. One of the great interests
recently in economic development is to bring a hotel in. Is there something that the City could
do with a developer that would meet both our needs and theirs? Staff would be open to that idea.
16
Council Workshop Minutes
May 13,2013
Page 4
Councilmember Bartholomay asked about big ticket items for each department. City
Administrator McKnight noted the CIP will have a big impact and the Fire Department has some
big requests. Fire Chief Pietsch stated they have discussed rehabilitating station one as they have
outgrown the meeting area. This is not needed today or even next year. When station one was
built the thought was that the community would grow around it, but that has not happened. The
current location may not be the best, because call times to the east side of town are lagging.
Does it make sense to rehab a building when it doesn't make sense to be there? The Fire
Department could do some research and suggested the other side of Chippendale.
City Administrator McKnight noted the police and fire have equipment requests.
Councilmember Bartholomay asked if we need servers in IT. Human Resources Director
Wendlandt stated the next replacement is in 2015 or 2016. We have an internal service fund for
them. Councilmember Bonar asked if there is a CIP for technology and do we have a good grasp
on what our resources are and where they are on a timeline? Staff stated all servers are on a four
year replacement schedule. Our computers had a replacement schedule, but due to budget issues
we went to a replace as needed for desk computers. Everything else is on a schedule. We have a
lot of money in maintenance agreements to provide for software upgrades. Video cameras are
upgraded constantly. Most of the software has a maintenance agreement. Recently we switched
how we buy Microsoft licensing. Previously we bought the license with the computer. Now we
buy it in bulk so if a computer dies, we don't have to buy new software. As part of the licensing
agreement we receive upgrades. Councilmember Bonar asked about communications and if we
are at the point where we should consider developing an app? We do a lot of outreach through
Facebook,Twitter, and Nixle and hard copies,but is that where communication is going where
people have apps on phones. Human Resources Director Wendlandt felt we will see more of that
happening,but was not sure if the City wanted to get into the business of developing an app. She
felt there will be opportunities where we can have an app someone else has developed. Our
challenge with communications and technology is right now we are doing a lot of things and
maintaining them. We don't have the staff to do all of it really well. Where the need will be is
we will have to split and have a traditional communications person and have a communications
person dedicated to the web and social media. Right now we don't have that. If it is a staff
person or a consulting person,that is where the cost will be.
Councilmember Bartholomay noted the Police Chief had requested three squad cars and received
two. Police Chief Lindquist stated they have re-arranged the higher mileage officers and split
them up with lower mileage officers and found ways to make the cars last longer. Next year it
will not be less than two vehicles, and he is not sure yet about three vehicles. This year we
received the cars early. Next year it could be July or August before they are received and if that
happens, cars will have 120,000 miles on them. Police Chief Lindquist stated over the last three
years the police have tried to keep the budget as flat as possible, if not a reduction. Things done
on an annual basis were set aside such as evidence recording equipment which is in the budget
this year;also, general maintenance of the building. Our DCC communication needs with radios
have a life expectancy of eight to ten years. We are seeing a problem with batteries. The
handheld radios are $2,500 - $5,000. It is prudent now to set money aside for them. There is
change in technology with computers in the cars.
17
Council Workshop Minutes
May 13,2013
Page 5
City Engineer Schorzman shared some observations. Everything discussed is money. The levy
as been the same for the last three years. We go through this process time and time again exactly
like now. He challenged Council to try a different process this year. He suggested Council give
feedback to City Administrator McKnight on what they can live with at the beginning of the
process, stick to it, and let staff develop the budget after we know what Council can live with.
Councilmember Donnelly asked what do we think the taxpayers will tolerate? Councilmember
Fogarty stated the vast majority have seen a tax decrease in the last couple years. Mayor Larson
stated we still have a City to protect and maintain and it takes a lot of money to do that. These
are real needs we have to consider. Finance Director Hanson stated if you wait, it is more
expensive. City Engineer Schorzman stated looking at the operation piece of the levy, taking
debt out,what do we operate in the general fund? The average cost per person is$266/year;this
is what they pay for all the services in the general fund. That is$22/month. That is less than a
cell phone plan or a cable bill. They get police and fire protection,roads,parks,trails, etc. for
less than a cell phone. When we talk about huge numbers everyone gets excited, but $5/month
equates to $35,000, as there are 7,000 homes. For the year that would be$420,000. The things
we support from the general fund are a necessity. Councilmember Bonar stated above
operational costs we have debt. There are facilities and infrastructure in place because of that.
He asked if we should consider structuring a debt or investment policy to help guide us and
future Councils. Finance Director Hanson stated the Council has an investment policy and we
can look at a debt policy. The basic principal would be what we talked about last fall which is to
levy for it in one year, collect the next year, and pay it the third year. If we do that over the next
five to ten years we will right the ship. Right now we are paying debt service and we won't get
the money until after the fact. We need to systematically make decisions that will move the
general fund into a positive without having to borrow from other funds and we need all the debt
service funds to stand on their own. Council has taken great steps with seal coating,trail and
building maintenance, and now we need to do that with the CIP. We need to systematically
accumulate funds over time to address the needs as they arise.
Councilmember Bonar noted Minneapolis did a survey and the greatest impact had to do with
snow plowing. It is one of those basic everyday services. What Municipal Services staff does is
very apparent,but people drive by it everyday and pay no attention. He asked if a street sweeper
is still on the radar. Municipal Services Director Reiten stated the street sweepers are a 1999 and
a 2001;the 1999 would be replaced. We will put it in the CIP. In the CIP for vehicles he sees it
six years out before starting. As far as a plow truck,that would be a general fund item, but how
much do other departments use the truck? Perhaps it shouldn't all hit the general fund. He is
also concerned about the situation if the county runs out of salt.
The preliminary budget number is at a 5% levy increase. Mayor Larson asked Councilmembers
to provide a number they would be comfortable with. He suggested 3—5%. City Administrator
McKnight stated the 5%does not include a change in the fiscal disparities number from 2013,
and LGA is not included. LGA would be tied to one time purchases. The 5% increase funds the
CIP. Councilmember Fogarty wanted the lowest number to fund the CIP. She did not like 5%,
but wants the CIP funded. Councilmember Bartholomay stated his top number would be 5%to
fund the CIP and meet our needs. Councilmember Bonar stated official budget deliberations
begin in June. He did not have a number yet as he wants to do some homework. Once he picks
a number there will be only a little sway to the left or right. Mayor Larson stated once we decide
18
Council Workshop Minutes
May 13,2013
Page 6
on a number, it needs to be the same number in December. Councilmember Donnelly stated his
top number is 5%. We held taxes the same for four years.
City Administrator Update—City Administrator McKnight and Police Chief Lindquist will be
meeting this week with the new owner of Carbone's regarding an outdoor concert this summer.
This is the last summer there will be an outdoor concert. Council agreed with staff putting
restrictions in place for this event rather than writing an ordinance.
The projector in the Council chambers has been discussed in the past. City Administrator
McKnight asked Council if they would prefer a large TV on the wall or individual small screens
at the Dias. After some discussion, Council reached a consensus for City Administrator
McKnight to obtain costs for a large TV on the wall. Cable funds will be used for the purchase.
Police Ride-a-longs—These are no longer done due to liability mitigation. Police Chief
Lindquist stated the police have three responsibilities—citizens, cops, City. Liability mitigation
in ride-a-longs hits all three of these. If someone is killed, you never stop paying for it. All of
the DVS information is available in the cars. If there is a domestic, you cannot take the rider in
the house with you. The computer remains on, and anyone can access information. It is not a
spectator sport, but it has been treated as such. If you were aware a potential problem existed
and you did nothing to address it,the courts frown upon that. Councilmember Fogarty felt there
are a lot of college age students looking at law enforcement and this would be a great
opportunity for them. However this is set up, she does not want that opportunity lost for them.
Police Chief Lindquist stated the liability concerns are the same across the board. It is a great
public relations tool, but he can give them the same experience by watching the video camera
footage from the squad cars. He has to mitigate liability wherever he can. We used to do a lot of
things that we probably should not do now. When he told his officers there would be no more
ride-a-longs,there was no resistance. If he tells an officer to take a citizen along, and the officer
says no, it is not safe, what does he do? Councilmember Fogarty felt he had a lot of influence
with his officers. Police Chief Lindquist stated his responsibility is to get them home safe every
night. If someone needs help,they will go. They cannot say I have a rider with me.
Councilmember Bartholomay stated Apple Valley and Northfield allows riders and he felt we
should too. Have them sign a strong liability waiver and set parameters. A lot of cities do
background checks before people ride. Police Chief Lindquist stated we all do background
checks and that will not stop them from having access to the computer. Councilmember
Donnelly was fine with no ride-a-longs and understood the liability. Police Chief Lindquist
stated a lot of people have focused on data and the wrongful sharing of data. If someone sees or
hears something they shouldn't,we have put that data out there. There are not a lot of requests
for ride-a-longs. Once in awhile we get a request from someone doing an internship and if we
can accommodate them we will. Councilmember Donnelly felt the less opportunity we provide
for accidents, the better. Councilmember Bonar stated his greatest interest is a broad and
consistent outreach to the public. Being seen as individuals as well as officers goes a long way
in serving the public. Police Chief Lindquist stated officers are tied to school events, or when
officers stop at a gas station they have a lot of interaction with residents. There are a lot of
opportunities with contact. Public interaction is taking place, Council was just not aware of it.
Mayor Larson suggested a compromise with law enforcement students and cops. Police Chief
Lindquist stated it is an all or nothing deal. It doesn't matter why they are there. This is not a
19
Council Workshop Minutes
May 13,2013
Page 7
good choice for us and is not the right vehicle for public relations. Police Chief Lindquist will
prepare a video to show Council.
MOTION by Fogarty, second by Bartholomay to adjourn at 8:20 p.m. APIF,MOTION
CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
Cynthia Muller
Executive Assistant
20