HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.03.99 Council Packet
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
May 3, 1999
6:00 P.M. INTERVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVEAGENDA
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a) Proclamation - Historic Preservation Week
b) Proclamation - Emergency Medical Services Week
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments)
a) Mr. Erling Kindem - Code Enforcement Complaint
7. CONSENT AGENDA
a) Approve Council Minutes (4/19/99) (Regular)
b) Adopt Resolution - Set Bond Sale 1999 Improvement Projects
c) Adopt Resolution - Set Bond Sale Equipment Certificates
d) Council Review of Administrator Performance
e) Approve 1999 Goal Setting Objectives
f) Capital Outlay - Liquor Store Operations
g) Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation Department
h) Authorize Settlement Agreement - Forfeited Vehicle
i) Nelson Hills 5th Addition Citizen Petition - Update
j) Approve Bills
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9. AWARDOFCONTRACT
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) 1998 Police Activity Report - Presentation
b) Amend Ordinance - Title 6 Operation of Motor Vehicles
c) Citizen Communication - Recreation Facility Request
d) Citizen Communication - Light Poles on Akin Road
e) Request to Amend Comprehensive Plan and Request for Rezoning- Silver
Springs
f) Adopt Resolution - Preliminary and Final Plat Charleswood 2nd Addition
g) Approve Planning Commission Appointment
h) Castle Rock Township - Revised Joint Powers Agreement
Action Taken
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a) Adopt Resolution - TH3 and Willow Street Improvements Feasibility Report
12. NEW BUSINESS
a) Adopt Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) Adult Uses
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
a) Councilmember Verch - Code Enforcement Issues
b) Councilmember Soderberg - 2nd Street Parking Discussion
14. ADJOURN
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.d.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~
Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Appointment to Vacated Planning Commission Seat
DATE:
May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
A special Council Meeting to interview three candidates for the vacated Planning Commission
seat has been scheduled for May 3, 1999, at 6:00 p.m. The interviews will be conducted in the
main City Hall Conference Room.
DISCUSSION
Enclosed are copies of applications and a listing of interview times for candidates interested in
the vacated Planning Commission seat. A fourth applicant was not available for an interview on
this date and asked to be considered again next year.
6:05 p.m.
Craig Cardinal
6: 15 p.m.
Benjamin Barker
6:25 p.m.
Tim Dougherty
The term for this appointment is 5/3/99 - 1/31/00.
ACTION REOUIRED
Indicate proposed appointment to vacated Planning Commission seat, to be ratified at the May 3,
1999 regular Council meeting, item 109).
Respectfully submitted,
~.U:~ g~~<;~
?..J
Karen Finstuen
Administrative Service Manager
CITY OF FAR."\HNGTON
~~: OS- P (Y\.
APPLICATION FOR BOARD OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
.
Name r~ r 0.: 13 C o...r d I hell
Address /f)~t,/ C~#a..JOC)d' C;~'" ~
Employed By ~'tf4"-f-O rAU'
Date of Application ~ho/? '1
tpJd-.-3'1'J.. - 3J.,5~ uJ
Daytime Phone # 4/00 - f(~Z5 tf
Board or Commission you wish to serve on
PI ann "J:j COtnrnl55/0'l1
Qualifications (C over pertinent educational background, employment positions and other experience on
com11uttees, boards, cOI!1JI'lissions and church organizations. etc.)
/""/..... 7'''';. L 0 "'..;
,J;c '11 4</ ,,01 Cl/,fj'" . /,,?~ J:;,.. oJ
,
~_r~J
eKA,'/4,." /f: ~ ~7 ~ "",Y C~4y...-/{~A.,..,.o./).
State briefly, your reasons for seeking an appointment to this board or commission "7::' ~d .4
~-<L 4cr"'~ g 4 /N T~ /t--~",f . ~...Q,/ ~r"- ~ ~
k_A.~ ;) yC ~At"_""/ ~ ~et~r./ 5 ~,-,<"",?4,.}. gA.-A) ~ ~'J€.g /,v
4~,( ~UY' ~I) ~~ ..Jc.ew ~ ~~UAf~f) ~ 6~/~ 't ~ J;u~/'
f d A?r~ J;-, ~ ~L ..:z-- C':--e/ ~J_'/ %,_...~ ,..;
#-,<4- ~~ .:Z;:;- ~rrJ:r:'
References (list any references you wish that would be familiar with your qualifications for the position).
,-,r;:~v€. ..;;. 4""'L L
vd,,,,, ~ eJ.rn:J
~N"" btJ.~~
Signature
e.
_ L:'t "'G
/
~~r t:~;-e
Date
uh" /99
HPR-22-1999 15:17
MN BOARD AELSLAGID
651 297 5310 P.02/02
ro: J5 ~(Y\.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
APPLICATION FOR BOARD OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
Name; Benjamin Barker
Date of Application: April 22, 1999
Address: 18711 Easton Avenue Daytime Phone #; (651) 296.2379
Q60 - 34 f g
Employed By: Minnesota Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying,
Landscape Architecture, Geoscience, and Interior Design
Board or Commission yon wish to serve on: City Planning Commission
Qualifications:
I received my Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota, and I have a
strong interest in government, at all levels. I currently work as the investigator for the
Minnesota Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture,
Geoscience, and Interior Design. This job requires me to interpret and enforce the
statutes, rules, and policies in order to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare.
This job entails working closely with twenty-one Board members on a daily basis_
Outside of my job as an investigator, I'm the treasurer of District 6 Hockey Referee
Association. This Board of eight writes and implements the rules of the association. The
association is made up of about 130 hockey officials who elect the Board members.
Being a part of a board requires teamwork, patience, and at times assertiveness.
State briefly, your reasons for seeking an appointment to this board or commission:
I am seeking an appointment to the City Planning Commission because this position
allows me to be a part of city govermnent at the beginning stages of planning. It would
give me an opportunity to help shape the city as it continues to grow. This position also
interests me because I have extensive experience at both the federal and state levels of
government, and I am interested in expanding my knowledge of city government Being
appointed to the City Planning Commission would allow me to be more involved in the
future of the City of Farmington, as well as helping me gain experience in local
government.
References:
Doreen Frost (651) 296-2388
Robin Brown (651) 297-4017
Signature: ~.~
Date: ~O/',
TOTAL P.02
04/15/99 THU 15:37 FAX 612 4632591
CITY OF FARMINGTON
~001
(PI, d--5 P, r1\,
CITY OF F A&'IINGTON
APPLICATIOl'l FOR BOARD OR COMMISSION APPOINTh1ENT
N~e Tim Dougherty
Date of Application 4/22/99
Address 517 Spruce Street, Farminqton
Daytime Phone # 61 2 - 8 54- 2 7 3 8
'/f;3 - 356 7.
Employed By . Teamsters Local 2000
Board or Commission you wish to serve on P I ann i ng Comm is s i on
Qualifications (Cover pertinent educationai background, employment positions and other experience on
committees, boards, commissions and church organizations, etc.)
My full-time position is a Business Agent for Teamsters Local 2000.
My responsibilities are to investigate, process, and file grievances
on behalf of the members. I conduct monthly membership meetings,
write quarterly newsletters, and maintain and promote involvement in
our union.
State briefly, your reasons for seeking an appoinunent to this board or commission
I spent most of my childhood in Rosemount and my wife was raised in
Farminaton. My family and I have lived in Farmington for three and
.
a half years. We have two children and are planning to raise them
in this community. I am interested in our small community and the
develoDments it will be makina now and in the future.
References (list any references you wish that would be familiar with your qualifications for the position).
Dennis Gramentz
651-460-6307
--:---
S. I -
19nature o'. .-r--
,~
_:::>.~/~ .
Date
L) /.:):J J 7 "'T
. I
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
$(2..
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator~
FROM: Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager
SUBJECT: Proclamation - Historic Preservation Week
DATE: May 3,1999
INTRODUCTION
Historic Preservation Week is May 9-15, 1999.
DISCUSSION
Historic Preservation is an effective tool for managing growth, revitalizing
neighborhoods, fostering local pride and maintaining community character while
enhancing livability. "Protecting the Irreplaceable" is the theme for National
Preservation week 1999 and is being cosponsored by the Farmington Heritage
Preservation Commission.
ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt the attached Proclamation designating the week of May 9-15, 1999, as
Preservation Week.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Karen Finstuen
Administrative Services Manager
HISTORIC PRESERVATION WEEK
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, historic preservation is an effective tool for managing growth,
revitalizing neighborhoods, fostering local pride and maintaining community
character while enhancing livability; and,
WHEREAS, historic preservation is relevant for communities everywhere and for
people of all ages, all walks of life, and all ethnic backgrounds; and,
WHEREAS, it is important to celebrate the role of history in our lives and the
contributions made by dedicated individuals in helping to preserve the tangible
aspects of the heritage that has shaped us as a people; and,
WHEREAS, "Protecting the Irreplaceable" is the theme for National Preservation
Week 1999, cosponsored by the Farmington Heritage Preservation Commission
and the National Trust for Historic Preservation.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald Ristow, Mayor of the City of Farmington, do
hereby proclaim May 9-15, 1999, as Preservation Week, and call upon the people
of Farmington to join their fellow citizens across the United States in recognizing
and participating in this special observance.
Gerald Ristow, Mayor
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
~
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
City Administrator9~
FROM: David L. Olson
Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Mr. Erling Kindem - Code Enforcement Complaints
DATE: May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
Mr. Kindem addressed the Council at the April 19, 1999 meeting regarding his concerns
of suspected code violations at 1009 2nd Street. The following is a summary of the
actions taken by the City.
DISCUSSION
The City has been active in the enforcement of City Ordinances as they pertain to this
property. The Police Department staff has responded to junk vehicle complaints
involving this property approximately nine times in the last two years. The property
owner was issued tickets on at least six occasions in responses to these complaints. The
tickets were paid by the property owner and the violations that were the basis of the
tickets being issued were abated at least temporarily.
Code Enforcement staff has also responded to complaints involving junk, debris, and the
placement of accessory buildings on the property at least three different times in the last
two years. In two of these instances, the property was cleared of the junk or debris so as
to be in compliance with City ordinances. Compliance with the most recent complaint
regarding accessory building requirements and junk is still pending.
Unfortunately this has been a situation where violations of City Ordinance continue to
occur regardless of enforcement actions taken by the City. This issue has been discussed
with the City Attorney and it has been determined that the City may need to look at more
severe types of enforcement actions than in the past which may result in formal
complaints being filed with the District Court. Staff will continue to keep Council
apprised of the status of this situation.
BUDGET IMPACT
The costs associated with the filing of formal complaints will need to be assessed on a
case-by-case basis.
ACTION REQUESTED
For information only.
Respectfully submitted,
~v~~
David L. Olson
Community Development Director
cc: Mr. Erling Kindem
.
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
56
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator~
FROM: Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager
SUBJECT: Proclamation - Emergency Medical Services Week
DATE: May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
Emergency Medical Services week is May 16-22, 1999.
DISCUSSION
Emergency medical services are a vital public service and members of these medical
teams engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to
enhance their lifesaving skills. Therefore, it is appropriate to recognize the value and
accomplishments of emergency medical service providers.
ACTION REOUESTED
Adopt the attached Proclamation designating the week of May 16-22, 1999, as
Emergency Medical Services week.
Respectfully submitted,
)!Cha~ ,;?~
Karen Finstuen
Administrative Services Manager
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, emergency medical services are a vital public service; and,
WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams are ready to provide lifesaving
care to those in need, 24 hours a day, seven days a week; and,
WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival and recovery
rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and,
WHEREAS, emergency medical services providers have traditionally served as the safety net of
America's health care system; and,
WHEREAS, emergency medical services teams consist of emergency physicians, emergency
nurses, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, educators, administrators, and
others; and,
WHEREAS, approximately two-thirds of all emergency medical services providers are
volunteers; and,
WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams, whether career or volunteer,
engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to enhance their
lifesaving skills; and,
WHEREAS, Americans benefit daily from the knowledge and skills ofthese highly trained
individuals; and,
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and the accomplishments of emergency
medical service providers by designating Emergency Medical Services Week; and,
WHEREAS, injury prevention and the appropriate use of the EMS system will help reduce
national health care costs.
NOW THEREFORE, I, Gerald Ristow, Mayor of the City of Farmington, do hereby proclaim
the week of May 16-22, 1999 as Emergency Medical Services Week and encourage the
community to observe this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.
Gerald Ristow, Mayor
k
COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR
April 19, 1999
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Ristow led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Also Present:
Ristow, Cordes, Soderberg, Verch
Strachan
City Administrator Erar, Attorney Joel Jamnik, City Management
Team
4. APPROVE A GENDA
MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS
Mr. Erling Kindem, 1014 3rd Street, made several comments regarding junk being stored
in his neighbor's yard. Staff will follow-up.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Council Minutes of April 5, 1999 were pulled as Councilmember Verch wanted to
abstain as he was absent from that meeting.
a) MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes to approve Council Minutes (4/5/99)
(Regular). Voting for: Ristow, Cordes, Soderberg. Abstain: Verch
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes to approve the Consent Agenda as follows:
b) Adopted RESOLUTION R38-99 accepting grant - Senior Center
c) Adopted RESOLUTION R39-99 accepting donation from Dakota Electric
d) Authorized RFP for Audio Visual Services
e) Approved agreements for Clean Up Day
f) Received school and conference information - Fire Department
g) Received Deer Meadows project update
h) Received first quarter building permit report
i) Approved bills
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
Council Minutes (Regular)
April 19, 1999
Page 2
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) Review of Housing Tax Credit Applications
The Tax Credit program provides a reduction in federal income tax liability to
owners of and investors in low income rental housing developments through the
allocation of certain Tax Credits to such owners. Dakota County HRA has been
designated as a sub-allocator and has been authorized to allocate $352,071 in
1999. Sherman and Associates Inc of Minneapolis is proposing to develop a 16-
unit townhome project on the portion of the East Farmington PUD located at the
comer of Larch Street and the newly aligned TH 3 frontage road south of Budget
Mart. Rent would be $722 per month plus an additional $68 utility allowance to
be paid by the renter. Mr. Jim Deanovic and the Minnesota Attainable Housing
Corporation propose to form a limited partnership called Farmington Family
Housing to develop 28 rental townhome units on property located at TH 3 and
County Road 66. The proposed plan consists of seven, four-unit townhome
buildings clustered around a circular private court along the south side of County
Road 66. Rent for two-bedroom units would be $621 plus a $62 utility allowance
to be paid by the renter. The three-bedroom units would have rents at $711 with a
$79 utility allowance also paid by the renter. Representatives for both projects
Were in attendance to answer questions. The City has committed to promoting the
development of additional rental housing as part of its previously adopted goals
under the Livable Communities Act. Council authorized the submittal of a letter
citing general concerns and overall support of affordable rental housing as
proposed at the East Farmington site and the Trunk Highway 3 and County Road
66 site.
b) 1999 LMC Annual Conference Attendance
The annual League of MN Cities Conference is scheduled to be held in Rochester
from June 15-18, 1999. Council should notify staff if they wish to attend.
c) Adopt Resolution - Accept MnDOT Grant for Senior Center Van
MnDOT has awarded a grant to the Senior Center for a new Senior Van. This van
will be shared by the City and DARTS. MOTION by Cordes, second by Verch
to adopt RESOLUTION R40-99 accepting the MnDOT grant for the new Senior
Center van. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
d) Adopt Resolution - Preliminary and Final Plat - Oak Place Townhomes
Mr. Colin Garvey and Mr. Pete Elvestad of Farmington Development Corporation
are seeking preliminary and final plat approval of Oak Place, a six-unit townhome
development located within the 100 block of Oak Street. Two minor issues
remain concerning the plat, one is concerning the labeling of the drainage and
utility easement, the other concerns additional trees be planted between the
townhome units and the railroad. The Planning Commission held a public
hearing on March 9, 1999 and forwarded a recommendation to approve the
preliminary and final plat to the City Council. MOTION by Soderberg, second
by Cordes to adopt RESOLUTION R41-99 approving the preliminary and final
plats for the Oak Place Townhomes contingent on resolution ofthe landscaping
and easement issues as described. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Council Minutes (Regular)
April 19, 1999
Page 3
e) Adopt Resolution - Oak Place Townhomes Development Contract
(Supplemental)
The Development Contract for Oak Place Townhomes has been drafted in
accordance with the approval and conditions placed on the approval of the
Preliminary and Final Plat. The Planning Commission recommended approval of
the Oak Place Townhomes Preliminary and Final Plat on March 9, 1999 subject to
the resolution of all comments from the Engineering Division. The City received
revised plans from the Developer's engineer and it appears as though issues have
been adequately addressed. The Developer expressed objections to the City
regarding several of the proposed charges contained in the Development Contract.
These include the Surface Water Management Fee, Sewer and Water Trunk Area
Charges and the Water Treatment Plant fee and Park Dedication fees. The
Developer feels since this area was previously platted and previously contained
single-family dwellings, that the area should not be subject to these fees as part of
the re-p1atting and redevelopment of the area. It has been the City's practice to
charge these types of fees in areas that are being redeveloped. The rationale for
this position is that if a property has not been charged an area or trunk charge
previously, then it is appropriate to charge these fees when a property is being
redeveloped.
Mr. Colin Garvey, Developer, had a question on the storm sewer charge. He
wanted to know, if he is required to update the catch basin in the back, aren't the
fees paid quarterly on the lots? Staff stated the storm sewer is required to handle
the drainage his development is creating. There is a difference between the cost
charged to homeowners on a quarterly basis and the trunk fees. The trunk fees are
for the overall development of the storm sewer or storm water management
throughout the City. The fees charged on a quarterly basis are for the
maintenance of that facility. By installing the catch basin it allows the developer
to meet several City standards for storm water design as well as solve significant
erosion problems. Mr. Garvey is asking ifhe should get some type of
reimbursement or credit for installing the catch basins against the surface water
management fee. The answer is no, the surface water management fee pays for
the overall storm sewer system in the City. The improvements Mr. Garvey is
putting in are for the benefit of the property. Mr. Garvey stated he was told by
staff to move the catch basin in order to widen the comer for the City garbage
trucks. Staff replied that is not a benefit, that is for the purpose of transportation
of those vehicles. Plows and garbage trucks need to go through the alley in order
to serve properties adjacent to the alley. Right now, the trucks tear up the turf and
the drainage causes erosion. If the project is not done to City standards, then the
City has to take steps to recover that. MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg
to adopt RESOLUTION R42-99 authorizing the signing of the Development
Contract contingent upon conditions and approval by the Engineering Division.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Councilmember Strachan arrived at 8: 20 p. m.
Council Minutes (Regular)
April 19, 1999
Page 4
f) Adopt Resolution - Preliminary and Final Plat - East Farmington 6th
Addition
Sienna Corporation is seeking Preliminary and Final Plat approval for the East
Farmington 6th Addition plat. The plat includes 76 single-family lots. MOTION
by Soderberg, second by Cordes to adopt RESOLUTION R43-99 approving the
preliminary and final plats for the East Farmington 6th Addition. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED.
g) Adopt Resolution - East Farmington 6th Addition Development Contract
The Development Contract for East Farmington 6th Addition has been drafted in
accordance with the approval and conditions placed on the approval of the
Preliminary and Final Plat. MOTION by Cordes, second by Verch to adopt
RESOLUTION R44-99 approving execution ofthe Development Contract and
authorizing its signing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
h) Adopt Resolution- Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Adopt Ordinance
Rezoning County Road 72 Properties
The City has initiated an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the properties
from Agriculture to Low Density Residential and then to rezone the properties
from A-I (Agriculture) to R-I (Low Density Residential). The purpose of the
rezone is a prerequisite of the Metropolitan Council to extend City services to
properly zoned properties. City sanitary services will be extended to the
properties during the reconstruction of County Road 72, residents are currently
connected to City water service. MOTION by Strachan, second by Cordes to
adopt RESOLUTION R45-99 amending the Comprehensive Plan of subject
properties from Agriculture to Low Density Residential subject to Metropolitan
Council approval. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Cordes, second
by Soderberg to adopt ORDINANCE 099-428 rezoning subject properties from
A-I (Agriculture) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) subject to Metropolitan
Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a) Adopt Resolution - County Road 72 Project
The plans and specifications have been prepared for the County Road 72 project.
At the public hearing on the project, Council directed staff to include the bike
path on the north side ofthe road as an alternate in the project proposal. At the
neighborhood meeting, the residents stated they did not want the bike path on the
north side of County Road 72. During the design ofthe project, the issue of
future development to the east of the Prairie Waterway was taken into
consideration in the design of the sanitary sewer. It has been determined that by
keeping the sanitary sewer deep to the east of the existing trunk sewer line and
installing a larger pipe, approximately 100-200 acres of future development could
be served to the east of the Prairie Waterway. The design of the road will include
a "L" intersection at the east end of County Road 72 by the Prairie Waterway,
thus eliminating the existing curve. Staff is continuing to coordinate with Trinity
Hospital regarding the possible reconfiguration of the Hospital's access to County
Road 72. The final resolution with the Hospital will be incorporated into the
Council Minutes (Regular)
April 19, 1999
Page 5
plans. The estimated total project cost (excluding the trunk sanitary sewer) is
$1,474,200. The County would be willing to participate in the costs of the
improvements as outlined in their Transportation Policy as part of a turn back
agreement with the City. The total estimated project costs associated with the
trunk sanitary sewer is $44,800. The watermain cost is $20,000. MOTION by
Cordes, second by Soderberg to adopt RESOLUTION R46-99 approving the
plans and specifications for the County Road 72 project and authorizing the
advertisement for bids with removal of the bike path. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
b) Adopt Resolution - Prairie Creek Storm Sewer Upgrade Project
The plans and specifications have been prepared for the Prairie Creek Storm
Sewer Upgrade project. The improvements proposed would improve areas with
poor drainage and bring the storm sewer system up to City standards. The
feasibility report identified optional improvements in the 4th Addition. Staff
recommends that the optional improvements not be included in the project. The
homes surrounding the ponds in this area have adequate flood protection as
required by the City's Surface Water Management Plan and the storm sewer
system in this area does meet the City's minimum design standards.
Mr. Todd Bowe, 18650 Easton Avenue, has been in contact with staff regarding
drainage in his backyard. The options for resolving the situation depend on
negotiations with the developer for the property to the east. Therefore, Mr.
Bowels situation is not part of this project. The City Attorney will draft a letter to
the developer.
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes to adopt RESOLUTION R47-99
ordering the project, approving the plans and specifications and authorizing the
advertisement for bids for the Prairie Creek Storm Sewer Upgrade project. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED.
12. NEW BUSINESS
a) Review of Chapter 1306 Uniform Building Code
The City Council adopted an ordinance in May of 1996 entitled Minnesota Rule
1306 which specifies requirements for the installation of special fire protection
systems in new, or expanded buildings containing 2000 square feet or more of
certain types of occupancy. A Council Workshop was scheduled for Tuesday,
May 11, 1999 to discuss the issue further.
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
Councilmember Strachan: There will be an ALF Board meeting on Apri127, 1999.
Councilmember Soderberg: A citizen asked if she parked in the 2nd Street parking lot at
3 a.m. (when she comes to work) ifher car would be ticketed. The signs say no parking 2
a.m. - 5 a.m. He would like staff to look at the downtown parking to accommodate these
citizens and suggested a sign stating no overnight parking. The Mayor stated we try to be
consistent throughout the downtown for snow plowing. Staff stated this is an opportunity
Council Minutes (Regular)
April 19, 1999
Page 6
to research various zones and po stings throughout the downtown area. Council can then
make an informed decision.
Councilmember Cordes: The Chamber of Commerce is working on developing a
new Farmington brochure.
Councilmember Verch: A resident in Hill Dee contacted him regarding fish houses
on a resident's property. Is there an ordinance for this? In another case, there are cars
with expired tabs in the driveway. He feels enforcing ordinances should become a high
priority. Staff replied the ordinances are reactive in nature. Regarding the house at 300
1 st Street, Councilmember V erch a~ked what the situation is with the property. Staff
replied the owner brought plans to the Planning Commission to remove the structure and
put another house on the site.
City Administrator Erar: The Mayor received complaints regarding work on the train
tracks. The railroad will contact the on-site supervisor. Ifthe mud is not cleaned up, the
City will clean the road and charge the railroad. Regarding inappropriate conduct, the
supervisor will talk with the crew. The workers will delay their start time on Sunday
morning to 8 a.m. as opposed to 6 a.m. He reminded Council of the Goal Setting
Workshop on April 24, 1999.
Community Development
Director Olson: Staff received a plan for Charleswood showing a proposed
monument type sign for the entrance to the development. Copies were distributed to
Council.
City Engineer Mann:
ordinance.
He discussed the enforcement of the erosion control
Mayor Ristow: He received a couple requests from residents which he
distributed to Council for their input. He received an invitation to the Arts Council which
he will try to attend. He will be attending the volunteer recognition dinner at the Senior
Center.
14. ADJOURN
Council went into Executive Session at 9:45 p.m. Executive Session adjourned at 10:30
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
7~)~~
Cynthia Muller
Executive Assistant
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
16
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~
Robin Roland, Finance Director
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Adopt Resolution - Set Sale of G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1999
DATE:
May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
Funding is necessary to construct the County Road 72 and Downtown Streetscape projects, as
described to the City Council in the respective feasibility studies. Council ordered these projects
on February 16, 1999 and April 5, 1999,respectively.
DISCUSSION
. The bond issue recommended is $1,775,000 and the proposed sale date is June 21, 1999. Bids
for the bonds would be received by Juran & Moody on that date and the successful bidder would
be authorized by the City Council at the Council Meeting that evening. The bonds will be dated
July 1, 1999 and the proceeds would be available to the City for payment of the construction
costs of these projects within thirty days of the sale.
BUDGET IMPACT
A projected cash flow for these bonds is attached. Both projects are Minnesota State Statute 429
projects with special assessments under the City's special assessment policy. Municipal funding
identified on the cash flow would come from enterprise funds (County Road 72) and the Road
and Bridge Fund (Downtown).
ACTION REQUIRED
Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the sale of$1,775,000 in General Obligation
Improvement Bonds on June 21, 1999.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
=........)
Robin Roland
Finance Director
04/21/99 WED 09:04 FAX 6512241305
s:::
~
~
i
-
~
~
o
=:I
~ I
I i
:;l!~ ~
s;5
i ~d9
~~!
~~~f;:
t:: 53 l5 ~
tl~~!l
CJ\
0.-
f
<:l
"'il
~
....
....
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Q
~i3~~~~~~~~;;~~~~;i~aa~~
~ ~~~~~~~~~~:~; =~;
........".,.......,.........
~~~8~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~88888
~~ffio~~i~~i~~g~~~5s~oooo~
~~Q ~~~~~ciciciciciacce =
~I:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~oo~_~~~....~~~~~~~~oooo~
8 ;Z;(::""CJ\CI\l:CIIBon.......-- c;;
~ ~
~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ~~~~~ -~~~~~~~~~ ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ !
...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8
~~OOOOOOQooo=Qoocooooog
~~~~~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~uo~~~~~~~~~~~~~$~OOOO~
~z ~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~ on
~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~:g2 g
~ ---------- ~
z ~ ;;
li8~~~!~~~~~~~~~~:~=~=~~~~~
; ~~~~_~O-M~~~~~~ ~
~ ~~~~~~.~~~.~.~~ Q
_ OO\D\Q~"""'...."'lI'"c._.~NM-- ;;zs
~ ...
~~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8888 8
~~oaaa@@@@@a~@@@@aoooo~
~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~
",,,,,"'''''''''''''111'\,,,,,,'''''''''''''\1''1'" _
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
~ =
fi:}~ "'"
U~U .
I ~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooo~
~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
~ ~ --------------- ~
~ M
...
~aa~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SQ~~~2~~~~~~~~~~~=~oooo
ffi - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~
---------..------
I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~2~~8~~g~~8~g~~oooo
CIl) ... f"1 0 \0 M \IS \Q \b . .(lq CIO N \6 GO lS
~.. ~ Fi ~ ~ sf ~ ~ "3 ~ ;f. ~ ~-~ ::: ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~o~~~~....................onoooo
~
~
8.8.8.~8.~~~8.~~~~~8.~~~~ 8
llllllllllllll~oOOO ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
--------------- ~
~~8-~a...8~....~~2=~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1aJ002
~~~~~
<":.:q~ U
- \0 0
;S ,..!,
...
:q~ ~~~~
"" \0
""
.... -
...
fii ..
I; ..I
~W~~~~
~~~~;1~
i:!;ffi~t;~
~Su~~~
o~~~~~
t.)~~__rn
UI ..1
U!~h
~~~~~;
8~~~~t;
I
~
~~
6~
8...
eiQ8
~~o
~- ~~
~---:'
_mffiffi
~~~~
~
~
on
~
~
...
a
~
8
=:I
=
~
I
.. =:I
~~
;;:!;;:!
..~ .~i~
~ ~.. ~ 8 w :;
Q;::li....I..i~~~
"':g ~ -<52...
~ Z r.::: .. a
~~ ~ iafi~
:s ;<
25~
i~ ~i!
...~5~~
IE"" ~ ~~
.. ~:: '1' a;
r;;; P<rIJ__
I
....
~ r---i {I[;:---~ i-a ~- -~rr. ~ I ~~. -a i
~ N~8~ ~~~~ ~e~~
~ ~5-~ ~ ~~
M -_ - - --
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ I ~
= M ~~
~ I ~~~ o~~~ ~~..
~8~Q~ ~!=:1~~~~ ~ ~
~~~~i ~I~~~~ ~~~
'"'U~U!2 i uap.,~ ~~~
~~~ld~ ~ ie~~~ 8~i
nll~~ lllUII.1 ~
;;
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
$1,775,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1999
Issuer: City of Farmington, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on May 3, 1999, at 7:00 o'clock
P.M. at the City Hall in Farmington, Minnesota.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents Attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages):
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $1,775,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1999
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public
corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents
attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a
correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said
corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all
documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and
that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as
required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer on May 3, 1999.
Administrator
'P
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption,
which motion was seconded by Councilmember
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $1,775,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1999
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota (the City),
as follows:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. It is hereby determined to be in the best interests of the City to issue
its General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1999 in the principal amount of$1,775,000,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475, the proceeds of which will be used to
finance improvements to County Road 72 and the downtown streetscape.
SECTION 2. OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE. Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson &
Kuehn, Incorporated is hereby appointed as financial consultant to the City in connection with
the sale of the Bonds. Said financial consultants have presented to this Council a form of
Official Notice of Sale for the Bonds which shall be placed on file by the Administrator. Each
and all of the provisions of the Official Notice of Sale are hereby adopted as the terms and
conditions of the Bonds and of the sale thereof.
SECTION 3. SALE MEETING. This Council shall meet at the time and place stated in the
Official Notice of Sale for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for the purchase of the
Bonds and oftaking such action thereon as may be in the best interests of the City.
Upon vote being taken thereon, the following members voted in favor thereof:
and the following members voted against the same:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE
CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA
$1,775,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1999
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
These Bonds will be offered for sale on sealed proposals on June 21, 1999. Proposals will be
accepted until 11 :00 o'clock a.m., at the offices of Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson &
Kuehn, Incorporated, 1100 World Trade Center, 30 East 7th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota, at which
time the proposals will be opened and tabulated for presentation to the City Council for action
thereon at a meeting to be held at the City Hall at 7:00 p.m., on the same day. No proposal
submitted can be withdrawn before the Council meeting.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated, as originally issued, as of July 1, 1999, will bear interest payable
semiannually on each June 1 and December 1 to maturity, commencing December 1, 1999, and will
mature on December 1 in the following years and amounts:
Year Amount Year Amount
2000 $115,000 2008 $120,000
2001 115,000 2009 120,000
2002 115,000 2010 120,000
2003 115,000 2011 120,000
2004 115,000 2012 120,000
2005 120,000 2013 120,000
2006 120,000 2014 120,000
2007 120,000
Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for any combination of serial
bonds and term bonds so long as the amount of principal maturing or subject to mandatory
redemption in each year conforms to the maturity schedule set forth above.
Interest will be computed upon the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months and will be
rounded pursuant to rules of the MSRB. The Bonds will be issued in the denomination of $5,000
each, or in integral multiples thereof as requested by the purchaser, and fully registered as to
principal and interest.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
Bonds maturing in 2005 and later years will be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option
of the City, on December 1,2004, or on any interest payment date thereafter, in inverse order of
maturity dates and by lot as selected by the Registrar (or, if applicable, by the bond depository in
accordance with its customary procedures) for Bonds maturing on the same date, at a price equal to
the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption.
MANDATORY REDEMPTION
Any term bonds issued shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption in part prior to their
scheduled maturity dates on December 1 of certain years, as more fully described in the Details of
the Bonds section herein, at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption.
BodK ENTRY ONLY
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds
made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond, representing
the entire principal amount of the Bond at maturity, will be registered in the name of CEDE & CO.
as nominee of The Depository Trust Company (t1DTCtI), New York, New York, which will act as
securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal
amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof or a single maturity through book entries made on the
books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to
DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments
to participants ofDTC will be the responsibility ofDTC; transfer of principal and interest payments
to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other
nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be
required to deposit the Bonds with DTC.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge special
assessments against benefited property. Bond proceeds will be used to finance certain public
improvement projects within the City.
TYPE OF PROPOSAL
Sealed proposals for not less than $1,748,375 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of
the Bonds must be mailed or delivered to Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn,
Incorporated, the City's financial advisor, and must be received prior to the time established above
for the opening of proposals. Proposals shall be accompanied by a good faith deposit (the Good
Faith Deposit), in the form of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft payable to the City, or a
Financial Surety Bond, in the amount of $35,500. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be
from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota. Such Financial
Surety Bond must be submitted to Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn,
Incorporated prior to the opening of proposals and must identify each underwriter whose Good Faith
Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter
using a Financial Surety Bond, then the successful purchaser is required to submit its Good Faith
Deposit in the form of a certified or cashiers check, bank draft or wire transfer as instructed by Juran
& Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Incorporated not later than 3:00 p.m. on the next
business day following the award. If such Good Faith Deposit is not received by that time, the
Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy such Good Faith Deposit requirement
and such amount will be deducted from the purchase price at the closing and no interest will accrue
to the purchaser. The Good Faith Deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the
proposal is accepted and the purchaser fails to comply therewith. Except as otherwise provided, the
Good Faith Deposit will be returned to the purchaser at the closing for the Bonds. No proposal shall
be withdrawn after the time set for opening proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for
consideration of the proposals is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of
the Bonds having been made. The interest rates specified by underwriters shall be in an integral
multiple of 5/1 00 or 1/8 of 1 %.
In order to designate term bonds, the proposal must specify "Last Year of Serial Maturities" and
"Years of Term Maturities" in the spaces provided on the Proposal Form. All principal payments
scheduled to be made in and before the year specified as the "Last Year of Serial Maturities" shall
be designated as maturity amounts of serial bonds; all principal payments scheduled to be made after
the year specified as "Last Year of Serial Maturities" and through each year specified under "Years
of Term Maturities" shall be designated as mandatory sinking fund redemptions of term bonds
maturing in the year( s) so designated.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded to the underwriter offering the lowest dollar interest cost to be
determined by the deduction of the premium, if any, from, or the addition of any discount to, the
total dollar interest on the Bonds from their date to their final scheduled maturity. The City's
computation of the total net dollar interest cost of each proposal, in accordance with customary
practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non-substantive informalities of any proposal or of
matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without
cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the
terms hereof.
REGISTRAR
The City will appoint U.S. Bank Trust National Association, in 81. Paul, Minnesota, as the paying
agent which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the
Registrar .
,
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds,
but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond or any error with respect thereto will
constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP
Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the
purchaser.
QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS
The City will designate the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section
265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, relating to the ability of financial
institutions to deduct from income for federal tax purposes, interest expense that is allocable to
carrying and acquiring tax-exempt obligations. "Qualified tax-exempt obligations" are treated as
acquired by a financial institution before August 7, 1986. Interest allocable to such obligations
remains subject to the 20% disallowance under prior law.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
In order to permit bidders for the Bonds and other participating underwriters in the primary offering
of the Bonds to comply with paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Rule), the City will covenant
and agree, for the benefit of the registered holders and beneficial owners from time to time of the
outstanding Bonds, in the resolution awarding the sale and prescribing the terms of the Bonds, to
provide annual reports of specified information and notice of the occurrence of certain events, if
material. The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the
Rule for the purposes of disclosing information on an ongoing basis. A description of the
undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. Failure of the City to enter into an undertaking
substantially similar to that described in the Official Statement would relieve the successful bidder
of its obligation to purchase the Bonds. The City has complied in all material respects with any
undertaking previously entered into by it under the Rule.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser at DTC. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion
of Dorsey & Whitney LLP of Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the Bonds,
and of customary closing papers, including a no-litigation certificate. On the date of settlement
payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal or equivalent immediately available funds.
,
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information
relating to the City and the Bonds, and the Official Statement will serve as a nearly-final Official
Statement as required by Rule 15c2-12 of the SEC. The Official Statement, when further
supplemented by an addendum specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates
of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official
Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By
awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting an official proposal
therefor, the City agrees that, not more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall
provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds have
been awarded a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and the addendum described
above. The City designates said senior managing underwriter as its agent for purposes of
distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each participating underwriter. Any
underwriter executing and delivering an official proposal form for the Bonds thereby agrees that if
its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a
contractual relationship with all participating underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring
receipt by each such participating underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Copies of the Official Statement, proposal forms and any additional information may be obtained
from the City's financial consultants, Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn,
Incorporated, 1100 World Trade Center, 30 East 7th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-4901 (1-800-
950-4666).
Dated May 3, 1999.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
John Erar, Administrator
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
~
FROM:
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator4~
Robin Roland, Finance Director
TO:
SUBJECT:
Adopt Resolution - Set Sale of Equipment Certificates
DATE:
May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
Funding is necessary to purchase the Capital Equipment identified in the 1999 Budget. This
equipment includes the Public Works Truck and Street sweeper, the Police Department's new
squad car and the Automated Vehicle/Packer for the Solid Waste Department.
DISCUSSION
The bond issue recommended is $490,000 and the proposed sale date is June 21, 1999. Bids for
the bonds would be received by Juran & Moody on that date and the successful bidder would be
authorized by the City Council at the Council Meeting that evening. The bonds will be dated July
1, 1999 and the proceeds would be available to the City for payment of the equipment purchases
within thirty days of the sale.
BUDGET IMPACT
A projected cash flow for these bonds is attached. The issuance of these certificates is provided
for in the 1999 Budget in the Capital Acquisition Fund which is supported by the Debt Levy portion
of the annual Tax Levy.
ACTION REQUIRED
Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the sale of $490,000 in General Obligation Equipment
Certificates on June 21, 1998.
;;:4L)
Robin Roland
Finance Director
~
i
!l
~
'"
~
II:l
~
~
i 11~5n
~ S'~ ~~~:~PPP;i~~~8. ~
.. z = . o V"') '3-r-\M 000 ~
~~S~ ~ ~_::t:t~. ~..L..
I-oljjJool~V!t 4: :::;~~~~ V'1
~1:;i!tS t; ---- ~
~ :l
~! ~~g8.l:!8.~8. 8.8.8. ~
~ Q e.. ~ Q p;;o' 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 :
....t:: !;: .... tl "'_"'":."1."'!.~ .,,;
i=tr: 5 UJ ;:::~Ea;! ."
o~~~ ~
8:
t
("01
:z:
o.
I
....
~
f:00 ~
~l:I:ir!!o""'''''''''OO N'oo
w)~"""'!~"'l<"!oo;"1"'!"'!
... 2>Q("oIlQOo,oo
:i to> ~S!~_~~ S"~
~ ",:::~:;!l~:;r~
1Il't-.-4 _.-1_
... ~ .,.,. ..,.,.
;l",t::8~t::i~~8"8g :;:!
~:3~~~~i!~~"';o ~
~SA"':"'o,..;";...r
1:13 - ~ ~
!:~8.~~~~8.8.8.
~...=oa~!~OOO
u '" ..0 '..Q
~
~1~e8.8.8.8.8. 8.8.8.
a~o~~~~ooo
~ 0'000
Si ~::3~::
18.~8.~8.8.8.~ ~
sOi~'Eia~oo 5;
c::i:itir-: r-i' ~
....
l~ljI!.ljI!.ljI!.bl!ljI!.bl!bl!Wt
!;j8.8.~~~~8.8.
~ 0 0 r"'I c-"I' c-'1 ~ Co 01
il~
"1"E!:l
- !.l
~
8.8.8. 8.8.8. g
~_~~8.o0 ~
~=E ~ ~.
....
~~ggg88g8
~_MMMM('"oII('"oIIM
-
~ i
=-
....
:3
~ i
~
....
....
I
~
~~
a~
::>",g
~A-
J::::~!<
~ ~~.
~;;~
...:~~::>
~~~~
~
~
I
I:.l
II:l
~
'"
i
8
~ i
....
.. ~
~:
.. ~ .. ~ ~ ;c
~ ...... ~ 8 ~ :i
~~~~'I~~m'
~~ Ii: .,
ii 0 ~ta
r--;~-~ ~~--f~--i-fi-~l~ ~~ ~ ---t~
I ....;!:! _0,("01.... ~....!;; ~
~ ~ ~ .~ ~
I I
~ ~ I
~ !fa ~~
~ o~~~ ~fd.1
l~ ~ ~ ~ 9 m ~ ~ I ~ ~ ;
~~tJl!l et;;~~< . ~
~!i~z o~~!S~ f2~-
~ ~ i m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! g ~ ~ ~I
~ ~ ~ ~ Q a a Z Z ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I
l~ t:: ~ ~ fa fa t2 t2 i:il u '" ~ ~I
_____________________________________...____..f!l
90f:T~ZZT99 XVd 90:60 OHM 66/TZ/~0
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
$490,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF 1999
Issuer: City of Farmington, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on May 3, 1999, at 7:00 o'clock
P.M. at the City Hall in Farmington, Minnesota.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents Attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages):
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $490,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF 1999
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public
corporation issuing the Certificates referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the
documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original
records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said
documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body
of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and
of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said
Certificates; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and
was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such
meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer on May 3, 1999.
Administrator
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption,
which motion was seconded by Councilmember
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $490,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF 1999
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota (the City),
as follows:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. It is hereby determined to be in the best interests of the City to issue
its $490,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of 1999 (the Certificates), pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301 and Chapter 475 to finance the costs of acquiring certain
items of capital equipment.
SECTION 2. OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE. Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson &
Kuehn, Incorporated is hereby appointed as financial consultant to the City in connection with
the sale of the Certificates. Said financial consultants have presented to this Council a form of
Official Notice of Sale for the Certificates which shall be placed on file by the Administrator.
Each and all of the provisions of the Official Notice of Sale are hereby adopted as the terms and
conditions of the Certificates and of the sale thereof.
SECTION 3. SALE MEETING. This Council shall meet at the time and place stated in the
Official Notice of Sale for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for the purchase of the
Certificates and of taking such action thereon as may be in the best interests of the City.
Upon vote being taken thereon, the following members voted in favor thereof:
and the following members voted against the same:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE
CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA
$490,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF 1999
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
These Certificates will be offered for sale on sealed proposals on June 21, 1999. Proposals will be
accepted until 11 :00 o'clock a.m., at the offices of Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson &
Kuehn, Incorporated, 1100 World Trade Center, 30 East 7th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota, at which
time the proposals will be opened and tabulated for presentation to the City Council for action
thereon at a meeting to be held at the City Hall at 7:00 p.m., on the same day. No proposal
submitted can be withdrawn before the Council meeting.
DETAILS OF THE CERTIFICATES
The Certificates will be dated, as originally issued, as of July 1, 1999, will bear interest payable
semiannually on each February 1 and August 1 to maturity, commencing February 1,2000, and will
mature on February 1 in the following years and amounts:
Year Amount
2001 $110,000
2002 115,000
2003 125,000
2004 140,000
Interest will be computed upon the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months and will be
rounded pursuant to rules of the MSRB. The Certificates will be issued in the denomination of
$5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof as requested by the purchaser, and fully registered as
to principal and interest.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
Certificates maturing in 2004 will be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the
City, on February 1,2003, or on any interest payment date thereafter, by lot as selected by the
Registrar (or, if applicable, by the bond depository in accordance with its customary procedures) for
Certificates maturing on the same date, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be
redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption.
BOOK ENTRY ONLY
The Certificates will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Certificates made to the public. The Certificates will be issued in fully registered form and one
Certificate, representing the entire principal amount of the Certificate at maturity, will be registered
in the name of CEDE & CO. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York,
New York, which will act as securities depository of the Certificates. Individual purchases of the
Certificates may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof or a single
maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal
and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the
Certificates. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the
responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by
participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners.
The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Certificates, will be required to deposit the
Certificates with DTC.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Certificates will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith
and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. The proceeds will be used to finance
acquisition of items of capital equipment for the City.
TYPE OF PROPOSAL
Sealed proposals for not less than $485,100 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the
Certificates must be mailed or delivered to Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn,
Incorporated, the City's financial advisor, and must be received prior to the time established above
for the opening of proposals. Proposals shall be accompanied by a good faith deposit (the Good
Faith Deposit), in the form of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft payable to the City, or a
Financial Surety Bond, in the amount of $9,800. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from
an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota. Such Financial
Surety Bond must be submitted to Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn,
Incorporated prior to the opening of proposals and must identify each underwriter whose Good Faith
Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Certificates are awarded to an
underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then the successful purchaser is required to submit its
Good Faith Deposit in the form of a certified or cashiers check, bank draft or wire transfer as
instructed by Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Incorporated not later than
3 :00 p.m. on the next business day following the award. If such Good Faith Deposit is not received
by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy such Good Faith Deposit
requirement and such amount will be deducted from the purchase price at the closing and no interest
will accrue to the purchaser. The Good Faith Deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated
damages if the proposal is accepted and the purchaser fails to comply therewith. Except as otherwise
provided, the Good Faith Deposit will be returned to the purchaser at the closing for the Certificates.
No proposal shall be withdrawn after the time set for opening proposals unless the meeting ofthe
City scheduled for consideration of the proposals is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date
without award of the Certificates having been made. The interest rates specified by underwriters
shall be in an integral multiple of 5/1 00 or 1/8 of 1 %.
AWARD
The Certificates will be awarded to the underwriter offering the lowest dollar interest cost to be
determined by the deduction of the premium, if any, from, or the addition of any discount to, the
total dollar interest on the Certificates from their date to their final scheduled maturity. The City's
computation of the total net dollar interest cost of each proposal, in accordance with customary
practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non-substantive informalities of any proposal or of
matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Certificates, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with
the terms hereof.
REGISTRAR
The City will appoint U.S. Bank Trust National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the paying
agent which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the
Registrar.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Certificates qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Certificates, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Certificate or any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Certificates. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS
The City will designate the Certificates as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section
265(b )(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, relating to the ability of financial
institutions to deduct from income for federal tax purposes, interest expense that is allocable to
carrying and acquiring tax-exempt obligations. "Qualified tax-exempt obligations" are treated as
acquired by a financial institution before August 7, 1986. Interest allocable to such obligations
remains subject to the 20% disallowance under prior law.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
Bidders and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Certificates need not
comply with paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 because the aggregate principal amount of
the Certificates and any other securities required to be integrated with the Certificates is less than
$1,000,000. Consequently, the City will not enter into any undertaking to provide continuing
disclosure of any kind with respect to the Certificates.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Certificates will be delivered without cost to
the purchaser at DTC. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal
opinion of Dorsey & Whitney LLP of Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the
Certificates, and of customary closing papers, including a no-litigation certificate. On the date of
settlement payment for the Certificates shall be made in federal or equivalent immediately available
funds.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information
relating to the City and the Certificates, and the Official Statement will serve as a nearly-final
Official Statement as required by Rule 15c2-12 of the SEC. The Official Statement, when further
supplemented by an addendum specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates
of the Certificates, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final
Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Certificates, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-
12. By awarding the Certificates to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting an official
proposal therefor, the City agrees that, not more than seven business days after the date of such
award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the
Certificates have been awarded a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and the
addendum described above. The City designates said senior managing underwriter as its agent for
purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each participating underwriter.
Any underwriter executing and delivering an official proposal form for the Certificates thereby
agrees that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall
enter into a contractual relationship with all participating underwriters of the Certificates for
purposes of assuring receipt by each such participating underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Copies of the Official Statement, proposal forms and any additional information may be obtained
from the City's financial consultants, Juran & Moody, a division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn,
Incorporated, 1100 World Trade Center, 30 East 7th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-4901 (1-800-
950-4666).
Dated May 3, 1999.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
John Erar, Administrator
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
lj
TO: John F. Erar, City Administrator
FROM: Mayor and Council Members
SUBJECT: Council Review of Administrator Performance
DATE: May 3, 1999
In recognition of your three-year anniversary on March 18, 1999 with the City 'of Farmington in
your position of City Administrator, it is both appropriate and timely for Council to consider
your performance and make any necessary adjustments in your compensation.
In review of an appropriate step increase and in recognition of your tenure with the City, Council
conducted a formal performance evaluation on April 19, 1999 during a closed Executive Session.
Performance criteria reviewed by Council included organizational management; fiscal/business
management; program development; Council relationship; long-range planning and other
associated factors contained within the formal review document. The outcome of this review, on
average, met or exceeded Council's expectations in every performance category. Council's
review comments and remarks, in general, reflect appreciation and satisfaction with your
performance over the last 12 months.
It is Council's understanding that your annual compensation has not been adjusted relative to
your performance since your last performance review 12 months ago. In review of factors such
as size and complexity of the organization; budgeting; staffing; City services provided;
population; growth management issues and position responsibilities, it was noted that
communities of similar size and organizational complexity offer compensation in the mid to high
seventies, along with other employment benefits that are somewhat more substantial than is
currently being offered. Taking these factors into consideration, Council has determined that a
step increase based upon your performance and tenure in the position is appropriate given your
responsibilities as City Administrator, City Clerk and as Director of Information Technology for
the City.
In particular, your leadership in the information management area has provided significant
benefits to our citizens and to the organization as a whole. Council has expressed support for
additional training in this area of your responsibilities noting the need to maintain your expertise
and competence in overseeing the City's information technology systems.
In light of this information, Council feels it is both financially responsible and prudent in terms
of the benefits the community has realized over the last three years from your specific areas of
expertise, to offer you a five percent step adjustment over your current salary of $70,932. This
John Erar, City Administrator
Council Review of Administrator Performance
Page 2 of2
represents an increase of $1.71 per hour over a forty-hour work week. As you do not receive
overtime for any hours worked over 40 hours per week, no additional costs to the City are
anticipated by this increase, with the exception of payroll taxes. Further, in recognition that your
vehicle allowance of $200 per month for City business related travel has not been adjusted since
1996, the Council has adjusted your montWy allowance to $300 for City business-related travel.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approval of these adjustments in your compensation shall be adopted upon acceptance by
Council, and shall be effective retroactive to April 1, 1999. Congratulations on ajob well done!
On Behalf ofthe Farmington City Council,
~;:;6
Mayor Jerry "Digger" Ristow
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington. MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/e
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Approve 1999 Goal Setting Objectives
DATE: May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
At the recent Council Goal-Setting Workshop held on Saturday, April 24, 1999, Council
discussed and reviewed proposed 1999 Goals as presented in the table below. Council provided
direction to staff relative to what goals should be pursued during the next 12 months. It was
understood that each goal approved by Council for further action would, at the appropriate time,
be brought back to Council for further action, as necessary.
DISCUSSION
COUNCIL ACTION ON PROPOSED 1999 GOALS
No. GOAL DIRECTION
1. Consider transferring facility ownership of the Farmington Further action directed at staff
Public Library from the City to Dakota County level to negotiate a draft Facility
Transfer Agreement Document
2. Consider adoption of a Council Policy on Council Workshop Further action directed to Draft
purposes and protocols Council Policy for adoption
3. Consider alternative Revenue Sources, i.e. Franchise Fees and Further action directed on
User Fees Franchise Fee; No further action
*Council directed that Franchise Fees may be pursued during directed on Street Light Utility
normal Franchise Agreement renewal periods. in 1999
4. Consider an ordinance that would designate new, undeveloped Further action directed to
MUSA for bow hunting within the city limits to control prepare draft Ordinance
increasing deer populations. Amendment
5. Consider establishing a formal City policy on annexation Further action directed to
petitions prepare draft Council Policy
*Further action will consist of preparing draft documentfor
review by Planning Commission and City Council. Possible
Joint Workshop to be held.
6. Consider actions regarding the proposed acquisition of Further action directed to pursue
property for the future construction of a new City Ballfield acquisition of proposed Ballfield
Complex as previously recommended by the Parks and Complex Site
Recreation Commission
7. Consider forming a City Task Force on Facility Planning Further action directed relative
Needs for the Year 2001 to forming a Task Force
Committee
8. Determine what the City/HRA's efforts should be relative to Develop a proposed approach for
Elm Street redevelopment, property acquisition and review by Council and HRA on
commercial/retail expansion Elm Street. Continue to pursue
Elm Park Cleanup
9. Consider actions to bring the City within the Metropolitan No further action; Staff to
Mass Transit Service Area monitor future needs and plan
accordingly
10. Consider actions relative to reinstitution ofthe DARE Program No further action; Review results
in ISD 192 of existing ISD 192 efforts over
next three year period
11. Consider revision of Township Fire Contracts to include Further action directed to review
additional factors in the charging formula to account for the existing service formula to
appropriate costing of capital facilities and equipment ensure funding equities
acquisitions.
12. Consider public communication issues and cooperative efforts Further action directed to
relative to the televising of government and community explore collaborative efforts
programmmg with Apple Valley/Rosemount
and ISD 192.
ACTION REQUESTED
Acknowledge status and direction of Proposed 1999 Council Goals as presented.
Res ectfully': Submitted,
~
hn F. Erar
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
7-f
To: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~
From: Paul Asher, Liquor Operations Manager
Subject: Capital Outlay Purchase - Liquor Operations
Date: May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
The 1999 Liquor Operation's Budget provides for the purchase of two Wine Chillers. One for
each store.
DISCUSSION
Staff has received quotes for the two Wine Chillers, from two different vendors. The vendor
with the lowest cost was chosen.
BUDGET IMP ACT
The quoted price of $2,450 for the two Wine Chillers is within the 1999 Budget.
RECOMMENDATION
F or Council information only.
Respectfully Submitted,
a-.o/~--J
~
Paul Asher
Liquor Operations Manager
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
}
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~
James Bell, Parks and Recreation Director
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation Department
DATE:
May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
The Parks and Recreation Commission ( P ARAC ) has reviewed the 1999 capital improvement plan for
playground equipment. In addition, staff has received quotations for the roof at the Senior Center.
DISCUSSION
The P ARAC and staff have been working on a plan to upgrade the play equipment and park construction
in the three year plan as approved by Council on August 18, 1997. The Commission is recommending
that the following park structures be purchased this year as part of the budgeted funds.
Play Equipment
Play Structure
Play Structure
Play Structure
Play Structure
Prairie Creek Park
Daisy Knoll Park
Troy Hill Park
Dakota Estates Park
Troy Hill Park structure and 5 swing sets for various parks:
Company Play Structure
1. Flannagan Sales $13,256.37
2. Lee Recreation $13,335.00
Swing Sets
$6,879.67
$7,577.25
In addition to play equipment, the Senior Center roof needs replacing and has been approved in the 1999
budget
Senior Center Roof
Atlast Roofing
All Systems Roofing
Mike Hince Construction
$9,575
$9,640
$10,230
The play equipment and Senior Center roof will be purchased from the low bidder.
BUDGET IMPACT
The budgeted dollars for the play equipment will come from Liquor Store profits and Park Improvement
Funds as outlined in the 1999 Budget and C.I.P.
The quotations for the Senior Center roof are within the 1999 budgeted dollars of$II,IOO.
ACTION REOUESTED
For information only.
Respectfully submitted,
~lS~
James Bell
Parks and Recreation Director
equip99
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
?~
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers and
City Administrator~
FROM:
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
SUBJECT:
Authorize Settlement Agreement, Forfeited Vehicle
DATE:
May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION I DISCUSSION
On January 15, 1999, Mr. Leonard Hall was arrested for DWI by the Farmington Police Department. That
arrest resulted in the forfeiture of his vehicle, a 1997 Jeep Wrangler.
As a result of negotiated agreements, Mr. Hall has agreed to plead guilty to his offense and purchase the
vehicle from the City for $10,000. Payment will be made on or before June 1, 1999. In the event that Mr.
Hall does not make payment in full by June 1, 1999 he agrees to forfeit all rights and claims to the vehicle.
Attached you will fmd the Settlement Agreement drafted by the City Attorney for Council review.
ACTION REQUESTED
Authorize the Settlement Agreement with Leonard Hall as presented.
Respectfully submitted,
--~~a~
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
U4/21/99 11:31
"5'612 234 6237
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
~003
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CASE TVPF.: CML FORFEITURE
Court File No.
Leonard Lee Hall,
Plaintiff,
YS.
STIPULATION
AMC 1997 Jeep Wrungler
MiulleSOLa LicellSe No. 613 PWE,
VIN #1J4FY29P4VP455554,
Defendant_
and
City of Farmington, a Minnesota
municipal corporation,
Claimaut.
WHEREAS, PlainLiff hilS a ~mJS~ o[ a\.:Liun [or furl~iLlIre UgilWsL D~[en(.hmL Prop~Ly uuder
Minnesota Statute ~169.1217 et seq; and
WHEREAS, Claimant has asserted that the vehicle is subject to forfeiture under Minnesuta
Stanltc ~169.1217 et seq; and
W.HERKAS, Plaintiff' and Claimant desire to fully and finally resolve this matter without the
need for further litigation pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated and agreed as follows:
1. Plaintiff, LeUIDlrtJ LI;I;;: H~tll, agn~es LO pay LO Lhe CiLy of Farmington, the S\Ull (If Ten
Thousand ($10,000.00 Dollars) for the return of the Defendant Property, that being one
AMC 1997 Jeep Wrangler. Minnesota License No. 613 PWE. VIN
#lJ4FY29P4VP455554. Upon payment, the Claimam agrees to release the vehicle to rbe
Plaintiff.
2. Plaintiff un~onu.itional1y releases and waives all claims against me State of Minnesota,
City of Farmington, their officers, agents and employees from all claims, demands,
damages, causes of action or suits of whatever kind and description that m.ight now exist
or hereinafter exist by rt~asun of or growing uuL o[ the January 15, 1999 DUI incident.
04/21/99 11:32
'6'612 234 6237
CAMPBELL KNl~SON
III 004
3. Plaintiff will have an opportunity tn it'u:pect the Defendant Property prior to it being
released to him. Said inspe.ction will be for the. purpose ot' de.termming the existence
and/or condition of the vehicle and any personal items believed to be remaining in the
vehicle.
4. Plainliff further accepts vehicle in lias is" condition and rcleascs the State of Minnesota,
City of Farmington, their officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims or
causes of action or suits of whatever kind and description resulting from any theft or
damage to the Defendant Property or the persuna1 pruperty cunlaint:d tht:rdn.
5. Plaintiff will not pay any additional towing or lot storage fees in addition to the payment
set forth in p~ragfaph Dumber one hel'ein.
6. Plaintiff will pay the $10.000.00 amount to the Farmington Police Department by 5:00
p.m., June 1, 1999 by certified fUIlds. Failure to make full ano complete payment hy
the above deadline wiH result in Plaintiff releasing all claims of ownership of the vehicle
and all clajm~ title and lights of ownership in the vehicle will bec:ome the property of the
City of Farmingtun. In the t:vent ui" non-puymeIll, Plaiuriff agrees (0 sign ~ll document!>
required to transfer title to the Farmington Police Department. Further, in the event of
non-payment, lhe Claimant would not be required to proceed with the statutory forfeiture
under Minn. Stat.. ~ 169.1217 and Plaintjff would waive any factual, sLatutury or
constitutional challenges to the fOlfcirore.
Dated:
This agreement encompasses a full and final settlement of any and all civil claims arising
. out of the January 15, 1999 DUI incident.
) 5>+ ltltt1
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
7.
By:
. hew K. Rl'okl, #2 8558
Attorneys for Claimant
317 Eagandale OffIce Cente:r
1380 CUIpOrClLe CeIlLer Cwve
Eagan, MN 55121
Telephone: (651) 452-5000
Dated:
R. Glt:nn Nord,
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
Q4/21/99 11:32
Dated:
Dated:
Dared;
'6'612 234 6237
CAMPBELL KNl~SON
Leonard Lt:t: Ilall,
Plaintiff
CITY OF FARMINGTON
3
By:
Its Mayor
By:
. .
Its City AdminislraLur
~005
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
.(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmin~on.mn.us
~'
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Nelsen Hills 5th Addition Citizen Petition - Update
DATE: May 3,1999
INTRODUCTION
On March 24th, 1999, City staff received a petition from several residents in the Nelsen
Hills 5th Addition. This petition was forwarded to Council on April 5th, 1999. The
residents in their petition cite concerns with the water levels in the ponds behind their
homes, which are located on Outlots B and C in Nelsen Hills 5th Addition, west of
Explorer Way.
DISCUSSION
On Wednesday, April 15, 1999, City staff held a meeting with several of the residents
who signed the petition to determine the extent of their concerns. The following issues
and concerns were raised regarding the ponding areas behind their homes.
1. There is significant erosion that is occurring at the flared end section that is located
behind lot 9, block 3 (18603 Explorer Way) and lot 1, block 5 (18607 Explorer Way).
In addition, the resident at 18603 Explorer Way is concerned about the grade
transition between his lot and the flared end section.
2. Several of the residents stated that they do not feel that the pond is as big as the
approved engineering plans indicate.
3. Several of the residents stated that they believe the high water level of the pond
encroaches beyond the existing drainage easements in their yards.
4. One resident expressed the opinion that the pond is not clay lined; therefore the water
"leaks" out of the pond and the water elevation in the pond is lower than the normal
water elevation at times.
5. It needs to be verified that the grades of the backyards surrounding the ponds match
the grades on the grading plan.
6. One resident questioned whether the overflow outlet of the pond was constructed too
high and if the emergency overflow swale for the pond was lower than the
surrounding backyards.
Staffmet with the developer of Nelsen Hills on April 21, 1999 to discuss the issues raised
by the residents in their petition. Staff is currently in the process of researching the issues
with the developer. A survey crew is scheduled to go out the first week in May to
investigate several of the issues. Staff s findings will be presented at a subsequent
council meeting.
BUDGET IMPACT
None.
ACTION REQUESTED
For information only.
Respectfully submitted,
';z{)J1~
Lee M. Mann, P .E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
Nelsen Hills 5th Addition citizen petitioners
Heritage Development
Attention: Lee Mann City Engineer Public Works Director
cc: Tom Bisch - Heritage Development
Farmington City Attorneys Office
We the undersigned, owners of the lots located in Nelson Hills Farms
Fifth Addition with the description of Block Five; lots one through five;
and neighboring houses are petitioning the holding pond, labeled as Pond
Two, for reasons concerning the normal and high water levels. We would
like immediate action taken to address normal and high water currently not
within the five foot lot easement specified for drainage and utilities. We are
demanding all proposed development of Addition Seven to be put on hold .
until this matter is reviewed. and resolved. We request that any pending and
future issues regarding development and watershed pertaining to this pond
and surrounding area be made known by written document to all undersigned
parties.
tlf{J c ~ #/,IPr"r
5i/I(Il.~~ !I;,ff?'
ADDRESS I SIGNATURE I DATE I
tX:fkV~f~ ~/~ ~'~1-9'1
yZiOO ~ 3-c2.) -CJq
~qNl",y",l}~ JY6n 81":or/ ~~~
lYiaW1 B4"")//1lF /86/1 /ixjPtr-er- w~Y' ~ 71..-
//617~ItJ/)~~ I/iAj ~.7Jl.7h-d ~-;L1-19
~ ~ - ~~ "
,,/. ,h I ~ 3 -.J-I-9'1
/ffptJ5 b'iplorer W'o/ 'f)fl;~ ~~
I NAME (print)
1) ~ IlZ k011 0....
NI'u\e. \<.u..\\R.
I
19b'a3
'3 - aJ -q Gj
3-z/-~9
1011111' L
W-l-UL
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/Oa..,
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers and
City Administrator 1!L-
FROM:
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
SUBJECT:
1998 Police Department Activity Report
DATE:
May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION I DISCUSSION
The Police Department has received the 1998 Farmington Crime Statistics from the Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension. Copies of portions of that report are attached for Council review. Statewide reports will
not be available until mid-year for comparison purposes but the local information will provide a good
picture of criminal activity in Farmington and the Police Department response.
In addition to the State information staffhas included a data sheet describing Crime Rates, Clearance rates
and population estimates since 1988 for Council review.
Staffwill be making a brief presentation regarding the 1998 statistics for adults and juveniles as well as an
explanation of trends observed over recent years.
ACTION REOUESTED
Information only.
Respectfully submitted,
~--,.,
-".,. ". ;"- ( / ,"
/ ~/d.-~/1i~J~~~~
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
i5
~
en
>
en
C)
z
1-4
~
CIl:
0....0\
Q.=....
II.IN=
CIl:"'=
Q.Q.
LUCIl:CIl:
.., ..,
1UU
..
;:)E
..,< ..
II.IE
.....CIl:<
<~CIl:
zenC)
I-4lQO
EOCll:
1-4..,Q.
CIl:
U
<
~
o
en
11.1
Z
Z
1-4
E
z
o
~
C)
Z
en 1-4
II.IE
. (.) CIl:
<z<
. <LI.
CIl:
<=
11.1=
....N
(.)=
11.1 0\
CIl:Q.-4
Z=
<z
= E
.-4 en
=11.1..
....en>-
IZU
XII.IZ
CIl:Ll.1I.I
uu.C)
;:)0<
-
:) ..
CIl:Q
o
1004
CIl:
11.1
Q.
~
CIl:
o
Q.
11.1
CIl:
CIl:
~ 11.1
enOOlQ
II.I....E
CIl: ;:)
CIl:CIl:Z
<11.1
g
>Z
lQ::;)
gen .
LUZ
CIl:O
<en .
II.IC1l:~
.....11.1(.)
U.p- Q.
CIl:
~lIoI
CI'IlQ
enll.lE
lIoICIl:;:)
Cl'lCIl:Z
Z<
11.1
u.>
u.lQ
o
g
.....11.1
<CIl:
~< .
OLU~
~""'U
(.)Q.
en
.....11.1
.....<CI'I
<::;)Z
~~II.I
O(.)u.
~<u.
o
.CIl:
.11.1
.lQ
.:1:
. en ;:)
g~Z'
LUZ
QI-4
Z<
::;).....
OQ.
U.E
ZO
::;)(.)
.~
'U
.Q.
Cl'lCIl:g
11.1011.1
CI'I ~
ZZCIl:
LU:ZO
U.OQ.
Ll.ZII.I
O~CIl:
....
-0
00
-0
Z
o
1-4
~
<
.....
::;)
Q.
o
Q.
=NN======N==........~~.-4=~N....=....=oooo
.-4 NN
=~-o~==========-oNN=oo....~=====
-0-0 ~ =~""N.-4 .... N........
. ....
=",,,,======,,,==....NN........O~~,,,=~=........
........ ~ 0000
=O=======~=====....N=-ooo",=====
00 ~ OO~-o.-4 N",N 00 ",,,,
........ ........
11.111.1
E~
1-4<
CIl:CIl:
U
O",,,,=OO==Ooo~O~O\~N-oooO\NO\=N=.-4.-4
~~ ~.... ....N",-o.-4~oo-ooo ~ 0\0\
~N"" =N.... 0000
.. .. ..
", ",,,,
=",,,,======~....=....N=oooo~Noo,,,=~=~~
, ",.... ............ -0-0
N NN
=O==Q====O====N=.-4.-4"'=====~~
0=============-0=....=....=====........
....N
=",,,,======~....=....NNooO\~~oo,,,=~=NN
",.... ............ ~~
N NN
.. .
II.Z.
'OZ
.eno
'CIl:en
.<CIl:
. <
'0
."
.:z:z
. ...
. . ..(.).> .en
.C) .C) .~ . .CIl: ....... .11.1
. 'ZZ .ZZII.I .>~ . .< .en.....
C) '1-40 . . '10040 .......CIl:Z . .~ .11.1(.)
11.1 . . ...... .~Q.E.... .~Q.~<~II.I ......0 .enl-4
Z .e< .~<CIl:c .~<II.I~Z ec~ .;:)%
, .1I.I11.1~ .::;)LU<~ .::;)LULUOLU.....II.I~ .lQLU
Z........~OE(.):zIO .(.):zu.~ ;:)~O~ .,>
O<lQQ.~CIl:, C)~', .. gu.Q.~u. .en
Z~I-4E <LUCIl:Z .II.IC1l:en>II.I:ZE lI.Ien~CIl:
'OUII.I>II.Iu.1I.I0~ .Ll.II.IQCIl:U<II.I>%OUII.I
CIl:~CIl:~CIl:CIl:I-4%CIl:....ZM%ZCCll:.....~Z~~;:)% ..-4....
11.1 O~II.II-4Z~~~;:)Z~C.....OZ~1I.I ;:)CIl:~Z
ell.lu.<lQu.~oen<C)~O%C)u.;:)<(.)O<~OO~~
CIl:Q. lQ en CIl: CIl:~ enCll:CIl:
::;)< 0 en ::;) <;:) CIl:C<
ECIl: CIl: < lQ ....< <Q.Q.
...........
.<<
.~~
'00
.~~
O\....==....~N=.-4oo==~==ooOO\oo
.... -0 ....N
....
====",N==~===",~=~=-o~
NN ", ~ N~ N N ........
",,,,==,,,,,,~=....=....~OO~ON=~~
N ~ N N N", = 0\00
.... N ~
N=",==-o==~==~===....=~N
~-oO\ =....0 NOON=O 00 OO~
........ ................
....N-o=",.-4oo0oo....~",~0\0~O-Ooo
~~N ~....~ ~O\"""'-o'" .... ~....
-0 -0 = N Noo~ -0 -O~
... ... ""
N ....", ........
....
~~",=",oo~=~=....-ooo~=oo=",~
~ ~ ", N ....N", ~ ....=
.... .... N....oo
....==========",=====N-o
N==========~=====""=
....
~~"'="'00~=~=""0\00~=00=~=
~ ~ ", N ....N", ~ ........
.... .... N....oo
.~
..... . .en .""
.11.1 .11.1 .(.)
.u. .en '1-4
.CIl:'>- .Z......Z .u.
en 11.1 .~ .11.1<.....11.1 .u.
~~ ..CIl: . .u.~<CIl: .<
.....Z .~II.I . .zLl.o~e ... .CIl:.....
::;)::;) 'ZQ. 'OQ~Q"'" .enen . .~<
CO .11.10 "1-4 ~1-4 .:zen> . .~
en(.) ':l:CIl:E .~xen % .<11.1..... 'XO
en, .1I.IQ.en .;:)II.IUC)(.) ......ZCIl:>II.I~
<>-...... l-4en~enl-4z, . ZII.IU~
CIl: .NZ.....ZM ~1-4> .CIl:ll.lez N
CIl:ll.leNII.ICO~CIl:O""''''''1-40~CIl:CCll:
1I.IC);:)LU.....QQ.enll.l(.)lQl-4 ';:)ZOCll:II.I~
%CIl:<lQOZ<O%CIl:EE;:)a;:)enC)%CIl:
~OCll:E~<LUCIl:~<<< 'I-4C1l:I-4<~<
Ou.u.LUen>:zQ.OZC)u.g.....Qg>OQ.
-0
~
....
~
....
~
-0
-0
N
-0
0\
<<:)
-0
..
~
....
....
~
=
....
....
....
(.)
1-4
U.
U.
<
CIl:
~
~
Q.
11.1
(.)
X
11.1
en",
11.1-0
enN
Z
11.1
U.
U.
Q
....
N
00
=
..
....
.....
.....
<
en
CIl:II.I
Q.....
u.1-4
Z
gLU
0>
1-4;:)
CIl:..,
11.1
Q.
en
1-4 0\
%~
~",
g
11.1
~
en
11.1
CIl:
CIl:
C
en
en~
Z....
Q::;)
eng
CIl:<
11.1
Q.
.....
<
~
o
~
Q
Z
<
CIl:
C)
.....
<
~
o
~
..-
~
Ll
..r::.
(J)
co ..- .... ..- """ 0> ~ <<:) 0 10 I"-
en CO CQ 0> .... 0 0 en .q- l"- N
en 00 N 00 C!- CO N N N ('I) 10
.... cO ri t.O CQ m
""" ..- N
..- ..-
.... ..- .... 0> .... en ~ It) 0 0
en N CO ..- 0 0 0 ~ 0 ..- ..-
en 00 N ..- en N <<:) N <<:) 00 0
.... cO oq: ri CQ 0 N m
..- 0
....
<<
<<
CQ ..- CO CO CO N ~ 0 ..- ('I) .q-
en 10 CO CO ~ .q- 0 It) 0> ('I) ..-
en l"- N N en 0 en M ..- ..- ('I)
.... cO oq: oq: It) ri ci
0>
..- ..-
'0
c: I--
:::::s
It) CO CQ N M 10 't!. en 0> .q- .q- 0
en I"- .... CO en .q- <<:) N 10 ('I) U
en .q- N N .... N.. It) M N_ ('I) CO
.... cO oq: It) ri m ....
N 00 0>
..- ~
"0
I- .... - 0> f--
~ CO CO ('I) CO 0> ~ 0 0 I"- 00 en ....
en I"- CO 0 <<:) 00 0 CQ 00 .q- ('I) en a.
Z en .q- .... 0> CQ ('I) CO N ('1)- 10 N .... 0>
~ 0
.... cO N m "- N cO 0
W en .... ltl
- 0>
:i a:: 't:
Co ..r::.
- .... I--
l- e M N It) 10 M N 't!. .... 10 co 10 c( >.
en 00 .... ('I) ~ I"- """ co N .q- C .0
a:: I- en 0 N 10 CQ 10 N .... co_ N.. co
It) 0 "0
""" cO ri ci co ('I) m :;:l .~
<C <C ..- .!! a.
0 iii ~ ..
a.. ! Co - "3 I--
W - N I"- 0 I"- co 00 ~ ~ .q- 10 N ~ 0 E
C en ..- en 10 .... en 0 co .q- 0> .q- en Co
en 0 .... ..- CQ ('I) N ~ 0> I"- "0
C .... cO ri ~ ;;:: ii 0>
Z ..- co N 0> II) ~ :::::s
..- ~ - III
- II) u ,~
W c c( J1 f--
CD -
0 w .... 0 <<:) 10 co N ~ M ('I) 10 .q- U I 'E
en .q- .... ('I) co 00 0 CQ ..- ('I) 10
0 en 0> N 10 co 10 en ..- .q- N_ ii 'u L.
- .... L6 ri 'O:t ('1)- Q)
..J ..- co ..- ~ c a.
Z ..- ..- - ~
e u 0 C>
<C IU U c:
a.. II) f-- f-- :Q -
:i <<:) I"- It) 0> It) 00 't!. .... <<:) 00 N CD - '5
en 0 N ('I) 0 co CQ ~ 00 10 - CD
en ('I) N N co ..- M I"- 10 IU :! .0
a:: .... t.O oq: ~ en ri ,~ ~
Z 10 Ilf ('I) ..
..- << ..- "C CD 'E
e e .5 D. ci
<< 0 J!!
<< <<
I- u. 0 ~ -
en ('I) .... ..- co N ~ en ('I) l"- N ci
0::: co co ~ N .... .q- 0 .... I"- 0> co C>
" en .q- N 10 .... ..- .... ('1)- 10 ('I) 0 ,5
.... t.O oq: ri M oq: ri ..-
Z W 10 ~ - III
..- ..- 0 -
a.. !!! 0
- c: L.
:i :::::s 0
0 - .. 0> I--
co co en 0> It) 00 ~ CQ 0> 00 0 ltl .0
0::: co It) ~ 00 CQ 10 0 It) 00 10 ltl "3 E
en .... .... 00 It) 0> co 00 0> :::::s -c
.... Ilf N ci M ....a N ci >. a.
<C It) m 0 c: (5
..- << ..- 0 a. 0> ..r::.
U. .. "E ..r::. 0>
0 .... III
.. - ltl c: :::::s
- Q ltl "0 0 0
....
2 - II) c: ..c:
W <( :i - J!! "0
ltl I- U Q - I- ~ 0> L.
E <( ltl (J) - III III 0>
0:: lXl W - I- ltl ltl Q.
.. 0 - ~ u c: E w (J) ltl .0
III lXl 0 .. - Cl III
W D. .. W c: ~ ....
w 0 - III W ...J 0 c:
I-- W - ~ - I-- - ltl W I-- ~ - 0 0>
m "3 - ltl
0:: D. W W U) W lXl "0 "0
'0 a:: w ~ Q. l- I- m a:: ~ 0> III 'iij
IE (/) 0:: 0 0 .5 III 0>
Q. ~ i 0 ltl .... ~
0:: 0 w w U) a:: ...J w a:: "0 .0 ltl
c( - :::iE ~ ... 0:: - ~ E 10
W W III W 0> ~ I"-
W z Q2 ii: w z ii: .... ..
:::iE ~ 0> W ~ ..r::. ltl III N
>- 0 u u Q2 c: U D. 0 U ,g> 0>
f-- - f-- I-- ii: I-- I-- - f-- - ii: f-- - III -
~ U) (J) 0 z C) ~ C/) ..r::. 2 c: 0
U U 'C ~ Z U .~ 0 ....
:) ::> ::> !!! .. ~
0 0 ...J ...J 0> C 0 ...J ..r::. ltl
::> ~ ~ III c( ::> ~ 0> Q.
Q2 ii: ltl :::! ii: III :;
a.. lXl w a.. E E Q. E
0 W W 0 0 - ...J :) 0 w 0 0> .;:: 0 :::::s
a.. U) C/) l- I- U m a.. C/) I- .... U a.. E
Q)
C)
ltl
a..
..-
""::
)
)
.s:::.
C/)
en C/) CD CD CJ) .q <X> .q <X> .q LO ..- N
C. =t:I: l- e LO LO ('t) <X> ('t) ..... N CJ) ..... N
::J ...J C/) ..- ..- N N N ('t) N ('t) LO LO CD
e ~ w
C) 0:::
Q) 0 0:::
en l- e(
ns
en
::J
0
'E:
ns
>
~ '#. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'tJ .J .q LO .q CJ) ('t) ('t) <X> <X> N N ('t)
:! LL .q ('t) ('t) N .q .q ('t) .q LO .q .q
W w 'S 0 ~
0
0 C) E ~ ~ l-
f-- 0
<C 0 :~
- (,)
...J en -
>- Q) (,)
0 ns
OJ E ii
'E:
a.. (,) e
tJ) f-- .... 's - tn C
0 0 W W ..... LO <X> <X> ('t) .q ..... CD CJ) ..... ('t)
... 'E: = I- .q LO <X> CD N .q e LO e ('t) CD
Z i= Q) (,) Z t/) ..- ..- ..- ..- ('t) N N
.Q .... W
0 W
0 tJ) E > a:
i= ::J = :J a:
l- e C) .., <
~ f-- Q) ns
C) .c -
- e
tJ) '0 Q)
Z ~
- Q)
- .... e c.
:E tJ) Q)
f-- E Q)
W e en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '#. '#. ~ ~
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0:: ::J .c .J CD LO CD ..- ..... ..... N N <X> <X> .....
en - LO CD CD ..... LO LO CD LO .q LO LO
<C 0:: ns .... LL ~
<C Q) 0 0
LL E e ?fl. 0
- 0 I-
(,) =
ns ns
>< E
Q) .)c
e e
ns
- c.
0 c. C
e ns - -
e e W CJ) ..- ..- CD LO e ..- <X> CD .q CJ)
tn I- LO e ..... CD CD CJ) ..... CD co ('t) LO
ns ns l- t/) ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- N ('t) ('t)
en ~ .J W
(,) e :J a:
= 0 c a:
en - < <
= (,)
J! Q)
l;:
en e
-
en ~
e
... .c
< I-
<X> CJ) e ..- N ('t) .q LO CD ..... <X>
<X> <X> CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ)
CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ)
D:: ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..-
<
w
>
Q)
C)
m
c..
..-
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
lOb
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers and
City Administrato~~r
FROM:
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
SUBJECT:
Ordinance Amendment Title 6
Operation of Motor Vehic1es
DATE:
May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION / DISCUSSION
A request was made at the April 5 City Council meeting to amend City Ordinance 6-9-9 to include
snowmobiles in the motor vehicle ban on lakes and ponds in the City. Council ordered preparation of a
draft amendment.
A draft amendment has been prepared by the City Attorney for Council review.
Staffhas contacted the Sno Tigers Snowmobile Club President by mail requesting feedback on the
proposed Ordinance Amendment. As of the date of this memorandum, staffhas not received any input or
feedback from this local community group. In addition, notice has been forwarded to the resident who
made the original request.
ACTION REQUESTED
Review the draft amendment and take action as deemed appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
-----",
(, \ ) .. ~\ .r-:~/J )
~~v~A~k~~
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
Attachments:
Draft amendment
Letter to Sno Tigers
cc: File
Doug Holmstrom, 20160 Doffmg Ave. Farmington
Dale Pettet, 20155 Dunbar Ave. Farmington
City ~f Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
Mr. Douglas Holmstrom
President, Snow Tigers
20160 Doffmg Ave
Farmington, MN 55024
April 14, 1999
Mr. Holmstrom,
The City of Farmington has received a request to amend City Code, Section 6-9-9, regarding the operation
of motor vehicles on lakes and ponds within the City. The amendment is being requested in the interest of
bringing consistency to the City Ordinance, preventing noise nuisance and preserving wildlife habitat.
Under current ordinance the only exception for the operation of motor vehicles on lakes and ponds is
granted to snowmobiles. The proposed amendment would prohibit all motor vehicles, including
snowmobiles, (boats and jet skis are already prohibited) from operating on lakes and ponds within the City.
Before taking any action on the proposed amendment the City Council is soliciting input from your
snowmobile club. If you would like to comment on the proposed ordinance amendment you may do so
directly at the City Council meeting on May 3rd, 1999 at 7:00 PM. If you choose not to make direct
comment at the meeting, for your convenience you may also comment prior to the meeting by writing a
letter to my attention at 325 Oak St. Farmington, MN.
I would also be happy to discuss this issue with you personally during regular business hours at 463-3333.
If you choose either written or phone comments I will present your views at the meeting prior to a decision
by the City Council.
If you have any comments or questions feel free to contact me.
...._~...~spectful~ly, ~.. .. I
.~.- . I.
\ ' v" '."
," -. . .,.)
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
cc: File
John Erar, City Administrator
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 6, CHAPTER 9
OF THE FARMINGTON CITY CODE CONCERNING
THE OPERATION OF MOTOR VEHICLES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Section 6-9-9(C) of the Farmington City Code is amended to read as
follows:
C) No person shall operate any type of motor powered vehicle upon any lake or
pond within the City.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its
passage and publication.
ADOPTED this
of Farmington.
day of
, 1999, by the City Council of the City
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Gerald Ristow, Mayor
ATTEST:
Approved as to form the
day of
,1999.
City Attorney
Published in the Farmington Independent the
day of
,1999.
71672
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/Oe-
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administratorf~
FROM:
James Bell, Parks and Recreation Director
SUBJECT:
Citizen Communication - Recreation Request
DATE:
May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
Mayor Ristow has received a letter from a resident requesting the City construct a Recreation Center.
DISCUSSION
The letter from the student resident requests that the City construct a recreational facility that would allow
students to play basketball indoors without many of the rules that the school enforces ( see the attached
letter). The resident believes that the City could offer better and more programming for the youth of the
community. It is suggested that a fee, such as is charged at private health clubs, be charged to the users to
offset some of the expenses. It is suggested in the letter that a facility would give the youth more to do,
thus keeping them out of trouble.
Staff will forward this letter to the Parks and Recreation Commission for review at it's regularly scheduled
meeting on May 5, 1999. The resident will be informed of the meeting, so that he may attend if he so
chooses.
ACTION REQUESTED
Acknowledge the receipt of a letter requesting a City owned Recreation Center and forward it to the Parks
and Recreation Commission.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
James Bell
Parks and Recreation Director
cc: Resident
600 Centennial Drive
Farmington, MN 55024
April 16, 1999
The Honorable Jerry Ristow
Farmington City Hall
Farmington, MN 55024
Dear Mayor Ristow:
I am a ninth grader at the Farmington High School. Some of my friends and I have
been looking for a place to play basketball indoors, but there are always rules to
playing at the schools in Farmington. For instance, you must have an adult with you
to supervise as you play. This is fine, but I think it would be more constructive if
you put a Recreation Center in the City of Farmington, not just for basketball but
for other things also, such as weight lifting, rock wall climbing, and a game room or
nursery. I think this will attract a lot of people. There should be a fee to pay at
the door such as a $2 fee to play for however long you want. For most you can even
set a family pass that you pay a fee of $150 at the beginning of the year and it
lasts for the whole year. Most of my friends wouldn't care about the fee.
This will also keep kids off the streets, and out of trouble. If you are looking for a
place to put the Recreation Center then, how about by the new Farmington water
tower by Akin Road. That would be a great spot to place it! I look forward to having
a place such as this, and seeing you go through with this idea to make Farmington
more active!
Sincerely,
td~o/
Rick Cox
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
lOa!
TO: Mayor, Councilmernbers, City Administrato~
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Citizen Communication - Light Poles on Akin Road
DATE: May 3,1999
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
At the April 19, 1999 City Council meeting, a letter from a resident was forwarded to
staff requesting that light poles be installed along Akin Road (attached).
As stated in the response letter to the resident (attached), Akin Road is under the
jurisdiction of Dakota County as it is currently a county road. In the future, when Akin
Road is turned back to the City after the completion of the new alignment ofCSAH 31,
the City would have the ability to review this request.
BUDGET IMPACT
None.
ACTION REQUESTED
For information only.
Respectfully submitted,
~Yn~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
19290 Euclid Ct.
Farmington, MN 55024-9594
April 15, 1999
The Honorable Mayor Jerry Ristow
Farmington City Hall
Farmington, MN 55024
Dear Mayor Jerry Ristow:
I have recently received my driver's permit. Many nights I drive on Akin Road and
cannot see very well. Putting on my high beam just isn't enough, because other cars
drive by. I've asked many of my friends if they would like street lights along the road
and many, almost all, agree with me.
Although residents might not want the light poles in their lawn, it would increase safety.
The painted lines also aren't bright enough. They will need to be painted often. If you
were to put lights up, that would be a permanent solution.
I can't believe there are other negatives on this subject. We are all hoping you will
consider putting up street lights along Akin Road.
Sincerely,
~~
Tres Humerickhouse
....
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
April 23, 1999
Mr. Tres Humerickhouse
19290 Euclid Court
Farmington, MN 55024-9594
Dear Mr. Humerickhouse:
On behalf of Mayor Ristow, I am responding to your letter requesting the placement of
street lights on Akin Road.
Akin Road is under the jurisdiction of Dakota County as it is currently a county road. In
the future, when Akin Road is turned back to the City after the completion of the new
alignment of CSAH 31, the City would have the ability to review your request.
If you have any further questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
~ }"'h ~
Lee M. Mann, P .E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Cc: Gerald Ristow, Mayor
John Erar, City Administrator
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
IDe,
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
City Administrato~
FROM: David L. Olson
Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Request to Amend Comprehensive Plan and Rezoning - Proposed Silver
Springs 3rd Addition
DATE: May 3,1999
INTRODUCTION
Tim Giles owner of TC Construction (Developer) has made an application to amend the
Comprehensive Plan and zoning for property he owns which is bordered by 190th Street,
English Avenue and Pilot Knob Road also known as the proposed Silver Springs 3rd
Addition.
DISCUSSION
As the attached April 13, 1999 memo to the Planning Commission prepared by Lee
Smick, Planning Coordinator indicates, the Developer is seeking to amend the
Comprehensive Plan for the portion of his property located at the intersection of Pilot
Knob Road and 190th Street from Low Density Residential to Business and to rezone this
property from R-1 Low Density Residential to B-1 Limited Business (see attached map).
The other portion of his property proposed for change is a portion of the property
between English Avenue and Pilot Knob Road which is proposed to be changed from
Low Density to High Density on the Comprehensive Plan and for the zoning to be
changed from R-l Low Density to R-3 High Density (see attached map).
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this request on April 13, 1999.
After considerable public testimony, the Planning Commission voted to recommend
denial of both requests to amend the Comprehensive Plan and denial of the requests to
rezone a portion of the property to B-1 Limited Business and another portion of the
property to R-3 High Density Residential based on the following findings:
. The proposed B-1 Limited Business zoning allows uses which are too intense given
the surrounding existing single family developed areas.
. The Developer of Silver Springs made a commitment to buyers of lots in Silver
Springs 1 st and 2nd Addition that this area would be developed as low density
residential. There was mention of the covenants that were approved as part of this
development and the restrictions included in these covenants precluded uses other
than single family residential.
. The proposed R - 3 High Density zoning would place residential development
immediately adjacent to a proposed commercial use.
. The Developer's unwillingness to consider a less intense commercial zoning
designation for the property.
BUDGET IMP ACT
None
ACTION REOUESTED
The Council has the following options available relative to this request:
1) Uphold the recommendation decision of the Planning Commission to deny the
request to amend the Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to High
Density Residential and Business and deny the requested rezoning from R-1 to B-1
and R-1 to R-3 in the area described as Silver Springs 3rd Addition.
2) Reverse the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approve the request to
amend the Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to High Density
Residential and Business and approve the area requested for rezoning R-1 Low
Density Residential to B-1 Limited Business and R-3 High Density Residential.
The Council will need to incorporate findings of fact to support the decision that is
approved. These findings would be brought back to the Council at the next meeting for
formal adoption. The Council's decision would not become final until these findings are
adopted.
Respectfully sUbmi~ ~
David L. Olson
Community Development Director
cc: Tim Giles, TC Construction
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
City Planning Commission
Lee Smick, AICP fJ--P
Planning Coordinator
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Application to Amend Comprehensive Plan and
Rezone - Silver Springs 3rd Addition
DATE:
April 13, 1999
INTRODUCTION
Mr. Tim Giles, TC Construction, has made an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan and
rezone the vacant property located at the northeast comer of 1 90th Street W. and Pilot Knob Road.
DISCUSSION
Mr. Giles is seeking to amend the Comprehensive Plan from Low-Density Residential to
Medium-Density Residential and Business and also to rezone the property from R-I (Low-
Density) to R-3 (High-Density) and B-1 (Limited Business).
The properties are currently vacant and are surrounded by low-density single-family residential.
A portion of the properties, Block I Lot 5, is surrounded by three streets (Pilot Knob Road, 190th
St. W. and English Avenue) which is the determining factor for the developer to seek a business
use in this location.
City staff met with Mr. Giles on November 3, 1998 to discuss the proposed project. He proposed
Block I Lot 4 be amended and rezoned from Low-Density/R-l to High-Density/R-3. He
proposes to construct a three-unit attached townhouse complex in this location to buffer the
single-family residential to the north and the proposed business use to the south. The proposed
parcel meets. City requirements for lot size and lot width.
During recent discussions with the Planning Commission. concerning the creation of the B-4
(Neighborhood Business District), City staff determined that an appropriate location for the new
district would be at the intersection of 190th Street and Pilot Knob Road. The purpose of the B-4
zoning district is to provide a setting for low and medium-density housing combined with
complementary and supporting business land uses that serve a neighborhood and are developed
and operated in harmony with the residential characteristics of a neighborhood.
Mr. Giles is currently proposing to rezone from R-l to B-1 (Limited Business). The purpose of
the B-1 zoning district is to provide areas along major thoroughfares for unified commercial
centers oriented to serving automobile traffic.
City staff has informed Mr. Giles that the staff would not recommend approval for rezoning the
property to B-1. Staff has determined that this location is not appropriate for the types of uses
allowed in the B-1 zoning district because the property will not be allowed to have access on Pilot
Knob Road or 190th Street causing traffic problems.
Staff is recommending that this parcel be rezoned to B-4 (see attached permitted and conditional
uses) to provide services to the neighborhood without causing impacts to the adjacent
neighborhood such as noise, noxious odors, reflections from bright lights associated with service
stations, increased traffic generated from the types of uses permitted in the B-1 zoning district.
Block 2 Lot 2 along I 89th Street does not comply with the existing R-I single-family residential
zoning requirements. The City requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet and a minimum
lot width of 75 feet. The proposed parcel contains 8,255 square feet and a lot width of 65 feet,
requiring that the lot be re-evaluated by the developer for lot size and width since this lot would
require a variance of 1,745 square feet.
The land area directly to the rear of Block 2 Lots I & 2 is reserved for a City park.
ACTION REOUESTED
I) Staff recommends approving the Comprehensive Plan amendment for Block I Lot 4 from
Low-Density Residential to High-Density Residential and for Block I Lot 5 from Low-
Density Residential to Business subject to Metropolitan Council approval of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment application.
2) Staff recommends approving the rezoning of Block I Lot 4 from R-I (Low-Density
Residential) to R-3 (High-Density Residential).
3) Staff recommends the denial of the rezoning of Block I Lot 5 from R-I (Single-Family
Residential) to B-1 (Limited Business).
4) Staff recommends that the developer re-evaluate the lot size and width to comply with City
standards.
RespectfulI..~
~
0:.eL .
Lee Smick, AICP
Planning Coordinator
cc: Tim Giles, TC Construction
10-3-2
, 0-3-2
(Ord. 086-177, 3-17-1986; amd. Ord. 088-198. 2-1-1988; Ord.
091-246. 5-20-1991; Ord. 092-284, 9-21-1992; Ord. 093-298.
2- -1993; Ord. 096-378 8-19-1996
(G) B-1 Limited Business District
1. Water recreation and water
storage
2. Public buildings
3. Public utility buildings
4. Farm implement sales,
service, repair
5. Offices
6. Wholesale business
7. Supply yards
8. Fast food establishments
9. Theaters
10. Mini storage units
11. Outdoor sales
12. Personal and professional
services
13. Car wash
14. Solar energy systems
15. Day care facility serving
more than 16 persons
16. Recreational assembly
places
17. Auction houses
(Ord. 086.177. 3-17-1986; amd. Ord. 090.227. 2-5-1990;
091.246,5.20-1991; Ord. 095-345, 1-3-1995)
1. Retail business
2. Auto sales. service. repair
3. Restaurants
4. Hotels and motels
5. Animal clinics
6. Commercial recreation
7. Recreational equipment sales,
service and repair
8. Motor fuel stations. major
9. Clubs, health clubs
10. Home and trailer sales and
displays
11. Parking lots
(H)
1. Retail business
2. Restaurants
3. Offices
4. Personal and professional
service
5. Public buildings
6. Auto sales, service and repair
7. Commercial schools
8. Commercial recreation
9. Animal clinics
10. Clubs. health clubs
,. Water recreation and water
storage
2. Research laboratories
3. Public utility buildings
4. Solar energy systems
5. Multiple-family dwellings
6. Wholesale business
7. Supply yards
8. Funeral homes
9. Elderly and handicapped
housing
City of Farmington
597
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 099-423
An Ordinance Amending Title 10 of the Farmington City Code, The Farmington Zoning
Ordinance concerning the B-4 Neighborhood Business District and by including permitted
and conditional uses for the B-4 Neighborhood Business District.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: Title 10 shall be amended by adding (underlined) and deleting (~) as
follows:
10-2-3: ZONING DISTRICTS, PURPOSE:
B-4 Neighborhood Business District is intended to provide a setting for low and
medium-density housing combined with complementary and supporting business
land uses that serve a neighborhood and are developed and operated in harmony
with the residential characteristics of a neighborhood.
SECTION II: Section 10-3-1 is amended by adding (1) B-4 Neighborhood Business and by
adding as a permitted use the following:
1. Personal & Professional Services (not exceeding 3.000 square feet of gross
floor area)
2. Personal Health & Beauty Services (not exceeding 3.000 square feet of
gross floor area)
3. Non-Profit/Public Buildings
4. Dav Care Facilities
5. Residential Care Facility
6. Neighborhood Services (not to 'exceed 3.000 square feet in gross floor
area)
SECTION ill: Section 10-3-1 is amended as follows:
(.:I) (K) 1-1 Light Industrial District
(1') eM) C-l Conservation District
SECTION IV: Section 10-3-2 is amended by adding (1) B-4 Neighborhood Business and by
adding as a conditional use the following:
1. Personal & Professional Services (exceeding 3.000 square feet in grOSS
floor area)
J.
2. Nei~hborhood Convenience Stores (no gasoline sales. not exceedinlZ 3.000
square feet in grOSS floor area - no automotive reoair facilities allowed)
3. -Restaurants (no drive-through services. limited to 3.000 sq,!:lare feet of
. gross floor area. no alcoh~l sales)
4. Funeral Homes
5. Animal Clinics (No kenneling allowed)
6. Pa,rking Lots
7. Multi-Family Dwellings
8. Churches
9. Schools
10. Light M~ufacturing and Assemblv (strai~ht trucks only. no tOInted or
semi-tractor trailer trucks)
.... ..-.
11. Clinics
SECTION V: Section 10-3-2 is amended as follows:
V) (K) I-I Light Industrial District
(K:) (M) C-l Conservation District
SECTION VI: After adoption, signing and attestation, this ordinance shall be published one
time in the official newspaper of the City and shall be in effect on and after the day following
:;u.ch publication.
Enacted and ordained on the I st day of March, 1999.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
.JJ~ 0;1;-
MAYOR
ATTEST:
rrfl~
C ~MINISTRATOR
~
Approved as to form tbe lit day of Marcb, 1999.
SEAL
Published in the FllfIIlington Independent the~day of ~ 1999.
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
10-F
TO:
Mayor, Council Members,
City Administrato~ r.JJ
Lee Smick, AICP f)
Planning Coordinato
FROM:
SUBJECT:
May 3, 1999
DATE:
Char1eswood 2nd Addition Preliminary & Final Plat
INTRODUCTION
The Genstar Land Company is seeking Preliminary and Final Plat approval for the 2nd Addition
of Charleswood consisting of 54 lots and covering an area of 19.57 acres. The 2nd Addition lies
directly to the south of the Char1eswood 1 st Addition.
DISCUSSION
A total of27 of the 54 lots shown in the 2nd Addition plat were part of the Council's Preliminary
Plat approval on February 17, 1998 in the I st Addition. However, when the final plat for the 1 st
Addition was approved on July 6, 1998, the 27 lots were removed because of changes in the
housing market. The 27 lots originally approved at the preliminary plat level have now been
included in the 2nd Addition.
The Developer proposes to amend the front yard setback requirements for the 2nd Addition. In
the 1 st Addition, the Developer required a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet, however, the
Developer proposes to increase the minimum front yard setback to 25 feet for the 2nd Addition
as shown in the attached letter. The minimum setback requirements for the 2nd Addition are as
follows:
Front Yard Setback
Street Side Yard Setback
House Side Yard Setback
Garage Side Yard Setback
Rear Yard Setback
25 feet
20 feet
10 feet
5 feet
20 feet
Street layouts in the 2nd Addition are shown as approved for the Schematic PUD. Street widths
will measure 32 feet from curb to curb within a 60-foot right-of-way.
The Planning Commission approved the preliminary and final plat on April 13, 1999 contingent
on the resolution of landscaping requirements on the boulevard and revisions to utility easements
shown on the plat.
The Developer has complied with the landscaping requirements stated in the Planning
Commission memo (see attached) and has also met the easement requirements described in the
Engineering memo to the Planning Commission dated April 8, 1999.
All major engineering issues have been resolved and Final Plat approval at the City Council will
be contingent on the preparation and execution of the Development Contract and approval of the
construction plans.
ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt a resolution approving the Charleswood 2nd Addition Preliminary & Final Plat contingent
on the preparation and execution of the Development Contract and approval of the construction
plans.
Respectfully submitted,
~.~~
Lee Smick, AICP
Planning Coordinator
cc: Steve Juetten, Genstar Land Company
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT
AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING OF FINAL PLAT
CHARLESWOOD 2nd ADDITION
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington,
Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 31d day of May, 1999 at 7:00 P.M.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member _ introduced and Member _ seconded the following:
WHEREAS, the preliminary and final plat of Charleswood 2nd Addition is now before the Council for
review and approval; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing of the Planning Commission was held on the 13th day of April, 1999 after
notice of the same was published in the official newspaper ofthe City and proper notice sent to
surrounding property owners; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the preliminary and final plat; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be feasibly served by
municipal service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the preliminary and fmal plat be approved and that the
requisite signatures are authorized and directed to be affixed to the fmal plat with the following
stipulations:
I. The major engineering issues on the site have been resolved.
2. Final Plat approval at the City Council will be contingent on the preparation and execution of the
Development Contract and approval of the construction plans.
3. The Developer reimburses the City for all engineering, administrative, .legal and SWCD costs.
4. The Developer agrees to furnish the City one (1) reproducible and one (1) eight and one-half inch
by eleven inch (8 Yz" x II") reproducible copy of the filed plat in accordance with Title 11,
Chapter 3, Section 3 (E) of the City Code.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 3rd day of
May, 1999.
Mayor
Attested to the _ day of May, 1999.
City Administrator
~
i:
.....
~
-q:
~
C\I
Q
<:)
f3
~
~
(,)
Q
~
'\
~
m I
~~;j i
, (:::~~=~ ~-=2:~ I
--
~ 2
f
~1 "
~~ t
" ~
i
1
~
"
z
i\ ..
h"
h:;;
~'s
h~
~-~
oh
-I &
~-i
~l.
t;~~
Illl
E~i~
~.i&i
~ !
<"
o
L~....
":~\\
<.....
~
!IJ
~~
~~
~'"
~!
I:l~
n
~..
l~
~~
'"
Ii -
~ i
~~ L
1: 1~
~~ l~
~~ ~I
~~ ~~
li ik
~ ..
~E ~I
H IE
hU
rx:
~
~
;::J
w
a:
0..
c>
o
~:~
rl...r'
,,>
t~<;.
.C"'l
c-,
o
~";.
\.r'l
">.
r(~~
t""'l
c~ III
C) ~
P " .
f.; ~ I p6
[oJ ! I
~ C~ I
C) I ..iI
~~ ~~ ~ 01 --I
() ~ I j:~
~ l.; " I
"t [oJ I " I .r:
-I I/) ~ __'.l__ I I ...i
-'
~ lO "- ~~ '" T'---' Ii!
l5 t; e I ! fll
"
" " I
-- i I . ~~
I ~:l
"'.. I QI --i
,('WIt: I .ll~
I
0l:10IlSJ'Wt'tO ","RIO JO'" ..../ " 111104 I :lfl
: !h~
~"
0'
~ .~
....;
~ .~
~'H
!!il
i
i ':11
j i::l
ii;;I
:J
. ..-::J
-::--7?"
;~
w~
i~
"-
/
/
/
^ (.1;
/ "
/ "
"
"
"
~
i::
......
~
q:
~
(\I
-
~
~
~
~
(,)
'J)
...
>-
a::
~
;
a..
Ii
-- ~
..
i1 ~
t
:l
Ii !
&
..
~ l
h.
tJ~
:~"
h~
-"l:
S'l h
gig
I~l
l't.. .
~~l:~
-.!"lj
i~ii. ~
~~~~
~jj~
dfi.g
~
i I
I~ e~
Ii- hi
:~ ~;
~: ~ I
oj ~i
';.... ~:5
:~. 1; ~
i;l s;<Cl
<::i ~i
:& _e
Ii Ij
~
z
:il ..
:il j
Q.
O'
O~
~~
...~
~.~
!IP
:tt
"-
~
,
I
I
I
I
0'-.....
I
I
I
i ':' l___J
i ___.,
.~ --T. I
-. I
I
I
OJ --\
1
I
I
I
H&
.~d
2n
t. B
Hi
i i;i
Ji ~ Iii
i: .1If1
~ i!~
~.!.
lr~
~tli
r~!1
:: 0 0_
~
s
L'...
~.
~~
it
~..
~1
"'.
"'-
n
~i
:S~
llil
~~
I
~
t
~
!
~
1
~
i
Is
~
l,l.
l'll. II '11 i
III ~lllll! 11111
I I m Il~ llf. 1111 (I
11',!1:II: '1"lI. t .
t1illil' !i 1"( ! I
il i;JIm 1111 r 1111
::l:::i
~~sss
~ ~~NN~
'I
1
1
.~ '.
i ~ i
I I ,t
~ ~ i
'. I ~ "
j'H ~
l Hrn
; !~"al~
e ~ 'A1!b
l i !i~~~
l ~~'lH
i !jJ:~
~"ql g . ~ ~ ~ "
l..!l ti Ii! ~ ~ , &l
i .
~
19 i;~ ! I
it !,U1J] I
!i i~ IcJ Ii i
;l Ii!
'l . r ~ I ;
!! i L H 1
II li i 1 ~ 'i t
~I 1 ~ i ~ i J f ~
ii l t d H I i Ii t
-f i'! I t ~ ~ I ~ ! ~
Ii J ~ ~! i · J ! ~ t
~- . t i 1 i ! ~ I t I ~ 1
J I! ! ! i! i ~ l t J i I
lJ 1 i ; i ~ lit III I i
~tHqll'~iJ'dd
(/ / ( . z IH H t Ij J J !J : :
... /. . "'q!ljillIPJ
/ ~ H!idi!lH.
,
'/' -.:/
"- . ,
'l>.."''''-''-- .' ,."
' ~~':~:-/:--
...~:?'.~.._.'''", ,,',
C;\~'\~~...,.'. '-~~:;t
. '_ i\:.\
..,~. : \ '
~ \\
if.! i;
.f-!j-+ r--
..-...~
o'~~t~l!;;";\1~~ j!r~ ~ ~~
' . ,''', ',' 0., . >L', -' .;,";; - '~'7_, ""'~r)t,!, ",;, 1
r,' "'~~~'f" '" _",T.""",_~.,_
-- "'--r:~\ ~~;' ~: ." ;:,,~,l> ';,,,
-, r~,
~~ {~<-.-l i:> L,::,:- ^s* .~~r~
..=
",It
Cf
II
:l
C1Z
82.
:.!::
cngl
~c
a:v.
Cc:
l5"
~
~ u!
Rill
In.
Mi 1"1
':i '.
';
~
.-, q
I
II
~ ~
-"-,..
~
'"
~
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.d.farmington.mn.us
To:
City Planning Commission
Lee Smick, AICP r' 0
Planning Coordinator y..
From:
Date:
April 13, 1999
RE:
Charleswood 2nd Addition Preliminary & Final Plat
Planninl!: Division Review
Applicant:
Genstar Land Company Midwest
11000 West 78th St., Suite 201
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
(612) 942-7844
Referral Comments:
1. City Engineering Division
Attachments:
1. Plat Application
2. Letter from the Developer
3. Preliminary & Final Plat
4. Landscape Plan
5. Comments from SWCD
Proposed Development:
The second phase will consist of 54 lots. The total
amount of acres for the second phase consists of 19.57
acres
Location of Property:
South of 195th Street and west of the newly aligned
CSAH 31.
Area Bounded By:
Single-family residential to the north. The PUD
designates high-density residential/commercial and
medium-density/high-density residential land to the
east, expansion of the single-family residential to the
south and agricultural uses to the west.
Existing Zoning:
R-3 Planned Unit Development
Lot Coverage and Sizes:
The maximum lot coverage for an R-3 Single-family
zone is 25%. Lot widths in the 2nd Addition (measured
Setbacks:
Streets and Accesses:
Sidewalks:
Topography:
Wetland:
Flood Plain:
Developer Added Amenities:
20 feet from the front property line) range from 63 feet
to over 95 feet.
The developer has proposed minimum setbacks slightly
different from the City guidelines:
Front Yard:
Street Side Yard:
House Side Yard:
Garage Side Yard:
Rear Yard:
25 feet
20 feet
1 0 feet
5 feet
20 feet
The 2nd Addition contains four to the north onto 195th
St. W, with Everest Path providing the most direct
access. Street widths will measure 32 feet from curb to
curb within a 60 foot right-of-way. The street patterns
will be curvilinear and continue in the same fashion as
the developments to the north. A cul-de-sac is located
at the termination of Excel Court.
Sidewalks or trails will be recommended along all local
collector routes per City Code requirements.
Site topography is generally rolling except for some
steep bluff areas along the easterly site boundary
overlooking a small valley running between the
low/medium-density residential parcel and the
medium/high-density residential parcel and along the
southeastern boundary of the low/medium-density
parcel over looking the wetland area. Elevation changes
range from 910 in the southern wetland area to 970 in
the northwestern most portion of the site.
Wetland areas do exist within the PUD but are not found
within the 2nd Addition.
The flood plain does not effect the 2nd Addition. The
developer has attempted to keep all development out of
the flood plain areas within the PUD.
Entrance monuments and medians are proposed to at all
entrances to the project. These monuments will serve as
the gateway to the project. The Everest Path entrance
will contain a center median and will be landscaped.
The developer's intentions are to complement the
monuments and alert vehicle drivers that they are
entering a residential area.
Landscaped cul-de-sac islands are proposed in the center
of all cul-de-sacs in the development. Since a cul-de-
sac exists in the 2nd Addition, the City is currently
reviewing this proposal. A homeowners association will
maintain the above amenities.
Parkland and Trails:
The Farmington Park & Recreation Board reviewed the
2nd Addition on April 7, 1999 and determined that the
boulevard trees are required to be planted at 50-foot
intervals rather than the 75 to 140-foot intervals shown
on the plan.
Additional Comments
The Developer is seeking Preliminary and Final Plat approval for the 2nd Addition of
Charleswood consisting of 54 lots and covering an area of 19.57 acres. The Charleswood
Schematic PUD was approved by the City Council on February 17, 1998. The Preliminary Plat
for Charleswood 1 st Addition was also approved for 110 single-family lots by the City Council
on this date.
For Final Plat approval on the 1 st Addition, the Developer reduced the number of lots to 83
because of changes in the housing market. The Council approved the Final Plat for Charleswood
1 st Addition for 83 lots on July 6, 1998 instead of the original 110 lots approved at the
Preliminary Plat stage.
.
Therefore, 27 lots proposed to be platted in the Charleswood 2nd Addition were part of the City
Council's Preliminary Plat approval on February 17,1998. The 27 lots that were part of the 1st
Addition are shown on the attached illustration.
The Farmington Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the plat on April 7, 1999 and
evaluated that the boulevard trees shown on the plan are not in compliance with City Codes. The
plan shows boulevard trees are spaced between 75 and 140 feet on center. The boulevard
planting standards require a tree be planted no closer than 30 feet, however, the Planning
Coordinator may approve special planting designs by the developer.
The Planning Coordinator has determined that boulevard trees planted every 50 feet or as close
to 50 feet as possible considering street lighting, utilities or signage may be allowed in the 2nd
Addition. The Planning Coordinator will be submitting this fifty-foot requirement in the Revised
Landscape Ordinance coming before the Commission in early summer. The fifty-foot distance
will allow for deciduous trees planted on the boulevard to have adequate space for spreading of
the crown at maturity.
The Engineering Division has attached their comments to this document. From this information,
it is clear that issues need to be addressed concerning the easements on the plat. These issues,
however, are minor and will not impede the approval process at the Planning Commission level.
However, the easements and landscaping issues must be addressed before the 2nd Addition is
placed on the Council agenda. Therefore, staff recommends that the Charleswood 2nd Addition
Preliminary & Final Plat be approved and forwarded to the City Council contingent on
Engineering and landscaping requirements.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Charleswood 2nd Addition Preliminary & Final Plat be approved and
forwarded to the City Council contingent on Engineering and landscaping requirements.
Respectfully submitted,
v~):eL j;.:J;;
Lee Smick, AICP
Planning Coordinator
APPLICATION FOR PLAT REVIEW
DATE: March 5,1999
PLAT NAME:
CHARLESWOOD 2ND ADDITION
LOCATION:
South of Charles wood 151 Addition (see attached plans)
AREA BOUNDED BY: Charleswood 15t Addition to the north, P.U.D. designated high/medium density
residential to the east (also part of the Charleswood community), agricultural land to the west and future
Charles wood residential to the south.
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 19.57 acres
ZONING DISTRICT: R-3 Planned Unit Development
NAMES AND ADDRESS OF ALL OWNERS: Astra Genstar Partnership, L.L.P., 11000 West 78th
Street, Suite 201, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344.
PHONE:
(612) 942-7844
NAME & ADDRESS OF LAND SURVEYOR/ENGINEER:
7599 Anagram Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344.
Westwood Professional Services,
NAMES & ADDRESS OF ALL ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS A V AILABLE FROM:
See attached list.
PLAT REVIEW OPTION:
Preliminary and Final Plat
PRELIMINARY & FINAL TOGETHER:Yes
IN SEQUENCE: No
PRE. AND FINAL PLAT ADMINISTRATION FEE: $1,536.00 PRE PLAT SURETY: $3,914.00
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM (WE ARE) THE FEE OWNER(S) OF THE ABOVE LAND,
THAT THE PERSON PERPARING THE PLAT HAS RECEIVED A COpy OF TITLE 11,
CHAPTERS 1 THRU 5, ENTITLED "SUBDIVISIONS" AND TITLE 10, CHAPTERS 1 THRU 12
ENTITLED "ZONING" OF THE FARMINGTON CITY CODE AND WILL PREPARE THE
PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.
~
SIGNATU OF OWNER
3-.::>- ?/
DATE
ADVISORY MEETING:
1. SKETCH PLAN
2. STAFF AND DEVELOPER CONSENSUS
GENSTAR
Genstar Land Company Midwest
11000 West 78th Street
Suite 201
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Tel: (612) 942-7844
Fax: (612) 942-8075
March 5, 1999
.jl.j.'~r;~5a;ili~ij/
'iJ \JI I!U);
, ~..... """"'-"-=oLz~,"",___...,....~,., J !..,//' ;
Ms. Lee Smick
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, Minnesota 55024
. '~,'~'~' ...---..--.....
Re: Charleswood 2nd Addition
Dear Ms. Smick;
Please find attached the required application form, fees and plans for Charleswood 2nd
Addition. With this submittal we are requesting preliminary and final plat approval for
Char1eswood 2nd Addition. This subdivision is an extension of Charleswood 1 sl Addition
and consists of 54 single family detached lots. The layout of the proposed 54 lots follows
the approved schematic plan.
Along with the requested preliminary and final plat approval, we are requesting approval
for a landscaped cul-de-sac island for Excel Court and a change in the minimum front
yard setback. The island is proposed to be landscaped and maintained by the
Charleswood home owners association. The change in front yard setback will increase
the minimum setback from 20 feet to 25 feet. With this setback change, the minimums
will be as follows:
Front Yard Setback
Street Side Yard Setback
House Side Yard Setback
Garage Side Yard Setback
Rear Yard Setback
25 feet
20 feet
1 0 feet
5 feet
20 feet
I look forward to discussing the submitted plans with you. Please let me know if you
need any further information.
Sincerely,
Genstar Land Company Midwest
~
Steven P. Juetten
Development Manager
. Attachments.
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farJl1ington.mn.us
TO: Lee Smick, Planning Coordinator
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Charleswood Second Addition - Preliminary and Final plat review
DATE: April 8, 1999
Engineering has completed review of the Preliminary and Final Plat for Charleswood
Second Addition and forwards the following comments:
1. Additional easement is required for the pond that was approved in Char1eswood 15t
Addition (NW comer of Lot 4 Block 1).
2. The centerline of proposed swale is outside the easement along the west edge of the
project (Lots 4 to 7 of Block 1). The easement needs to be revised to encompass the
swale.
3. A minimum 20-foot easement is required for storm lines (between Lots 3 and 4 of
Block 1, between Lots 10 and 11 of Block 1, Between Lots 13 and 14 of Block 2).
10-feet of easement on either side of the pipe needs to be provided. Engineering
design alternatives in this area of the plat have been identified and may precipitate
other easement revisions.
4. Emergency overflow swales need a minimum 20-foot wide easement centered on the
property line.
5. An easement or outlot that completely encompasses the proposed pathway alignment
including easement for SE comer of Lot 8 of Block 7 needs to be provided.
These issues need to be addressed before the City Council gives final plat approval. All
engineering comments forwarded in staff s review letter dated 4/8/99 need to be
addressed before approval of the final engineering plans. .
Respectfully Submitted,
~mm~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
John Erar, City Administrator
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER
CONSE.RVATION DISTRICT
Dakota County Extension and Conservation Center
4100 220th Street West, Suite 102
Farmington, MN 55024
Phone: (651) 480-7777 FAX: (651) 480-7775
April 2, 1999
Mr. Michael Schultz:
Associate Planner
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington. MN 55024-1358
RE: REVIEW OF TH~ GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR CHARLESWOOD
SECOND ADDITION LOCATED IN THE SE V. OF SECTION 23 AND N % OF NE % OF
SECTION 26, T114N, R20W, CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA
Ref: 97FRMOSS
Dear Michael:
The Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District (District) has reviewed the Grading and Erosion
Control Plan for the above-mentioned site. This phase of the CharJeswood PUD entails 53 single-family
lots on approximately 20 acres; the entire site encompasses approximately 396.8 acres. This report
summarizes the proposed erosion controls and submits additional erosion and sediment oontrol
recommendations.
EROSION CONTROL OBSERVATIONS
We observed the following erosion and sediment controls on the plans:
1. Silt fence below most graded slopes; hoavy-duty slit fence below 3: 1 slopes.
2. One rock construction entrance.
3. Hay bale check dams at the outlet of three drainage swales.
EROSION CONTROL COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
There has been 8 history of excessive erosion and sedimentation on this site and the following
recommendations are designed to avoid future problems.
1. Install a temporary sediment basin at the back of Lot 4, Block 4 to collect and treat ronoffprior to
discharge to the proposed temporary swale. Another temporaI}' sediment basin may be necessary
south {)r LOl 9, Block 1 to control flow from the proposed swale.
,~, Di vert runoff away from the historically unstable slope adjacent to Block 7 to a temporary sediment
pond. Convey overflow from this pond via a slope drain to the existing, large sediment pond at the
loe of the slope.
3. TempOTaJy sediment basins must be oonstructed properly to be effective. A stabilized emergency
spillway must be installed. Further. install a temporary riser at the sediment pond outlet to optimi1.e
sediment trapping efficiency.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNI1Y EMPLOYER
, Cbarleswood PUD
97FRMOSS
z
4. Line all JX.nnanent and temporary drainage swales with high velocity erosion control blanket prior to
installing check darns. Prcseed these areas.
5. Use rock checks, sediment log ditch blocks, or other city-approved device in place of hay bale checks.
InstaJI these devices within all swales and other areas whc:re intensified flows are expected at
approximately 50' intervals.
6. InstaJI check dams on the proposed btke path.
7. Minimize disturbance to existing vegetation in future phases of the project to the extent possible.
8. Modify the General Note regarding site-dewatering to include the following:
· Water pumped from a depressional area must be discharged to a sediment pond or filtered prior to
discharge to a wetland, waterbody, or storm sewer. Silt fence is not designed to withstand the
force exerted by channelized flow.
· Trenches cut to convey water from a ponded area must lead to a sediment pond or other sediment
control prior to diScharge to a wetland, waterbody, or storm sewer.
· All sediment basins, inoluding temporary ponds, must have a controlled and stabilized overflow.
· Energy dissipation devices must be installed where the trenches and pump hoses disc;harge to
areas with exposed soils. This may not be necessary ifpump hoses are discharged to a stablo,
vegetated area.
9. Install silt fence at the toe of all down-gradient exposed slopes.
10. Once the proposed storm sewers are in place. inlet filters with emergency overflows should be
installed to minimize the amount of sediment entering the stormsewer. Ibis is critical during the
period following utility lnsblllation prior to street paving, and should be oontinued until the site is
stabili?'.ed.
I 1. Install silt fence, a double row of sod, or alternative devioe behind curbs and the downslope gradient
between lots (immediately after curb construction) to minimize runoff from lots during building
construction.
12. Show type of energy dissipation devices at all stann sewer outlets, inoluding outlets from temporary
sedimt."Tlt basins.
13. Include details for all erosion controls on the plan, especially the ditch blocks and erosion control
blanket.
14. Include temporary and permanent seeding, mulching, and fertilization specifications on the plan.
15. Include notes regarding specific NPDES pemrit requirements on the plan. including inspection,
stabilization. and maintenance timing.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this plan. Good implementation, consistent monitoring, and
maintenance of an erosion control measures are important to minimize erosion on this construction site.
PlelZse be aw"re th"t beclZuse the project disturbs more thll" 5 (teres. the applicant mllst tlpply /0'"
MPCA General Storm water Permit Ilt Isut two days prior to 'nUllltlng collStrJlctio,.. If you have any
questions please contact me at (651) 480-7779.
Sincerely,
9o~
Jay Riggs
Urban ConsQVationist
cc: Mr. Jeny Auge. City of Fanning ton
Mr. Jay Michels, MPCA
. TOTAL P .1213
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
I~
TO: Mayor, Counci1members, City Administrato~
FROM: Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager
SUBJECT: Appointment to Vacated Planning Commission Seat
DATE: May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
A seat on the Planning Commission has been vacated and must be filled.
DISCUSSION
The City Council, at a special meeting held at 6:00 p.m. earlier this same date, interviewed the
following candidates for appointment to the vacated Planning Commission seat. The newly
appointed commissioners term will be in effect from 5/3/99 - 1/31/00.
Craig Cardinal
Benjamin Barker
Tim Dougherty
Upon approval of the City Council the newly appointed commissioner will be notified by letter
and will receive an Oath of Office and Certificate of Appointment.
ACTION REOUIRED
Approve the appointment to the Planning Commission for the above stated term.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Karen Finstuen
Administrative Services Manager
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor & Councilmembers
FROM: John. F:. Erar, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Supplemental Agenda
DATE: May 3, 1999
It is requested that the May 3, 1999 agenda be amended as follows:
PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
10 (h) Castle Rock Township Revised Joint Powers Agreement Analysis
Attached is additional information regarding this item.
Respectfully submitted,
John F. Erar
City Administrator
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.d.farmington.mn.us
lOA
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Castle Rock Township - Revised Joint Powers Agreement Analysis
DATE: May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
As Council is aware, Castle Rock Township has submitted a revised Joint Powers Agreement
(JP A) that substantially affects the City's financial and legal position relative to the
reconstruction of Ash Street and construction of Phase III of the Prairie Waterway. This analysis
will provide Council with a brief overview of the changes and implications associated with the
Township's proposed revisions.
DISCUSSION
In comparing the Joint Powers Agreement that Council adopted on April 5, 1999 with the revised
JP A submitted by the Township, the following changes and issues were noted:
Joint Powers Agreement - Recitals
. The title of the Joint Powers Agreement has been revised to include Property Tax and
Annexation Issues as an expanded scope to the original JP A.
. Under the fourth Whereas paragraph, the Township has added subdivision (9), citing that the
Joint Powers Agreement will now "provide for a resolution of property tax and annexation
issues" .
Issues/Concerns: As Council may recall, the primary purpose of entering into the Joint
Powers Agreement was to establish a new basis for investigating and confirming project
costs associated with the Reconstruction of Ash Street and construction of Phase III of the
Waterway. The Township now desires to definitively address annexation and related property
tax issues, without the benefit ofthe updated Feasibility Report.
In staffs view, discussing and committing the City to a position of annexation issues is
premature as the Feasibility Study has yet to be conducted and the project authorized. An
appropriate avenue to deal with annexation and related issues would be through a separate
Orderly Annexation Agreement. The issues at this point are too ill-defined until the outcomes
Mayor and Council Members
Castle Rock Township - Revised Joint Powers Agreement Analysis
Page 2 of 4
of the Feasibility Study are known. Attempting to deal with the Township on annexation
does not allow for any discussion on a number of project-related issues. For example, how
project related fees will be collected from Dakota County Fair Grounds and Dakota County
Extension Facility property.
. Under the last paragraph under Recitals, the Township has deleted some fairly significant
language relative to the words: "jointly" and "equal".
Issue/Concerns: The deletion of these two words is contrary to Council's position that the
costs of this feasibility study would be "equally" shared between the two jurisdictions, and
essentially changes the very nature and character of the joint powers agreement. It would
appear, from the deletion of this language, that the Township is no longer willing to bear an
equal cost burden of preparing a new feasibility study. Issues relating to equally sharing the
cost of an updated feasibility study were a critical aspect of previous Council-Township
discussions.
Joint Powers Agreement - Agreement of the Parties
Section 2. Feasibility Report. The implications associated with these changes raises the issue of
one jurisdiction having to bear the entire cost of their respective portion of the Feasibility Report
even if the cost was far greater than what the other jurisdiction would experience. This change is
contrary to the Council's position that each jurisdiction equally share in the costs of preparing a
new Feasibility Report. Council should be advised that the City Engineer and Township
Engineer have already agreed that the Township would prepare the updated study for Phase III of
the Prairie Waterway, and the City would prepare the updated study for Ash Street.
The significance of this engineering agreement resides in the fact that the amount of engineering
work and resulting time relative to Ash Street is far more substantial given the design of utilities,
the design of a storm sewer system and coordination with Dakota County on the reconstruction
of the roadway. This change virtually assures that the City will bear a more significant cost than
the Township in preparing the updated feasibility study.
Section 5. Feasibility Report Cost Allocation. The revised language clearly stipulates that each
jurisdiction will pay its respective costs associated with the updated Feasibility Report, unless the
project is ordered in which case the costs of the Updated Feasibility will be allocated according
to project construction allocations based on storm sewer flows from affected properties. This
essentially leaves the City with the greater cost unless the project is ordered. Again, minimizing
the financial risks for the Township in the event the project is not ordered. The fifty-percent cost
sharing language was agreed to by Township representatives at the last fully attended project
subcommittee meeting. This section significantly changes the very nature and character of
the joint powers agreement and the very premise of the Council's previously adopted
Project Principles.
Section 6. Easement Acquisition. This section was added by the Township and provides that
the City will bear all costs associated with acquiring easements regardless of their location, and
Mayor and Council Members
Castle Rock Township - Revised Joint Powers Agreement Analysis
Page 3 of 4
that such would be treated as separate project costs. Implications associated with this language
subjects the City to paying these costs external to normal project expenditures. Given the fact
that any easements associated with construction of Phase III are entirely within the township, and
that other easements associated with placing sewer and water main connection points are located,
with the exception of one property, in the township, cost implications for the City are significant.
This section significantly changes the very nature and character of the joint powers
agreement and the very premise of the Council's previously adopted Project Principles.
Section 7. Construction of Improvements. This section was added by the Township and
provides that the City will pay all costs associated with any improvements either in the City or
Township, with the exception of improvements under the jurisdiction of the County. It would be
staffs understanding, that the construction of utilities, storm sewer and other miscellaneous costs
would be the City's sole responsibility and could not be assessed against benefiting properties.
Furthermore, by stipulating that all costs, "except to those Improvements under the jurisdiction
of the County", would suggest that the City would also pay for improvements in the Township as
those improvements are not under the jurisdiction of the County. This section significantly
changes the very nature and character of the joint powers agreement and the very premise
of the Council's previously adopted Project Principles.
Section 8. Access to the Improvements. This section was added by the Township, and provides
that the City agree to 1) allowing properties to connect at "any reasonable time", and 2) to "Pine
Knoll type hook up charges". Moreover, based on my understanding from discussions with
Councilmembers Cordes and Soderberg, that the City will credit private property owners for the
value of their on-site systems. These changes substantially violate City and Council policies
relative to connection periods (no more than two years), and would, under "Pine Knoll type
assessments" reduce the City's ability to fully assess township properties for the cost of the
improvements. Furthermore, crediting private properties for on-site systems raises significant
practical, legal and statutory issues. This section significantly changes the very nature and
character of the joint powers agreement and the very premise of the Council's previously
adopted Project Principles.
Section 9. Annexation and Property Tax. This section was added by the Township, and places
a number of highly complex issues before Council associated with annexation and property tax
shifts. As previously stated, agreeing to negotiate annexation issues at this time is both ill-
advised and premature and could place the City at a significant disadvantage until the findings
from the Updated Feasibility Study are known and clearly understood.
In terms of the opening paragraph of this new section, a number of statements characterizing the
City's needs and historical references to past annexation efforts are somewhat ill-defined relative
to their intended purposes. However, regarding the City's needs to complete Phase III of the
waterway, the City has indicated that the driving force behind this project are primarily
associated with controlling storm water runoff from predominantly township properties, as well
as responding to failing septic systems that must be updated pursuant to State environmental
laws.
Mayor and Council Members
Castle Rock Township - Revised Joint Powers Agreement Analysis
Page 4 of 4
With respect to the second paragraph of Section 9, these issues are best discussed under an
orderly annexation agreement. This office has had very preliminary discussions with
Councilmember Cordes relative to the Township's request of no "forcible" annexation of
properties that do not connect to the City's public utilities for a period of twenty (20) years.
While the Council has indicated no interest in annexing township property that does not connect
to City utilities, language that could potentially lock the City into a long-term agreement should
be carefully investigated and thoughtfully considered. This type of discussion, again, is most
appropriate once the feasibility study has been updated. For example, how would the City deal
with property owners who want to annex into the City for services but where the provision of
service would cross onto unwilling properties? A myriad of questions yet to be raised or
identified could ultimately impact Council decision-making on this and related annexation
Issues.
RECOMMENDA nON
In the final analysis, the issues will become increasingly complex once more information is
available. Accordingly, the Updated Feasibility Study will provide both jurisdictions with the
information necessary to advance to the next step in the process. Other issues involving the Fair
Grounds and Dakota Extension Service need to be addressed relative to their ability to
underwrite project assessments that will finance project bonds.
In conclusion, not enough information is available to address annexation or to commit the City to
anyone course of action.
~ .es. ectfully Submitted,
/ ~k
hn F. Erar
.
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/Oh
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Castle Rock Township - Revised Joint Powers Agreement
DATE: May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
My office recently received a copy of a revised Joint Powers Agreement (JP A) relative to the
proposed ordering of a new feasibility study by the City and Castle Rock Township. Significant
changes have been made to the JPA by Castle Rock Township officials and, consequently,
additional review of these changes by staff will need to be conducted in order to fully understand
the related City implications.
DISCUSSION
While a very preliminary review of the revised JP A has taken place by my office and City
Attorney Jamnik, a more comprehensive review will need to be conducted relative to thoroughly
examining the legal, administrative and project cost related implications. An analysis of the
revised JP A language will be presented to Council at the May 3, 1999 Council meeting.
BUDGET IMPACT
At this time, a preliminary review of the revised JP A, sections (2), (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9)
strongly suggest that a significant increase in City project costs would occur if the project were
ordered under the new and revised provisions of JP A.
ACTION REOUESTED
For Council information. Attached please find a copy of the draft revised JPA as presented to
City officials by Castle Rock Township and a copy of meeting minutes as prepared by
Councilmember Cordes.
I Submitted,
fohn F. Erar
04(2~!1999 08:47
~~T~,(~'
651-463-7737
'1-1a.'U~ l 1~:~5
ZMP NATCA
~l::Vt:H:suN ~l"lt.!-Wi'('"
PAGE 01
L,lOJCJ1U/.J; oJl 0
/f}/i'i; Jl'1~
JOIN'r I'OWEIlS AGrBEEMENT ""V:.Ji./'U
POll THE PREPl\RJ\TION OF A )?~LlMIN'ARY ENGINnEIUNG
FEASmn..ITY !l.EPO.RTt AND POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION AND
FINANCING OF lMPROva,.JENTS TO ASH STREET /PHASE III Of
PRAIRTE WATER WAY AND PROPERTY TAX AND ANNEXATION
ISSUES 1N TIm SOUTHEAST AREA O)t TFiE CITY OF FARMlNGTON
AND PORTIONS OF CASTLE ROC~ TOWNSHlP.
THIS IS A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT entered into under MiM. Stat. i471.S9.. by
lUld bc:twl:c:n lhe CITY OF FARMINGTON. a Minnesota Municipal Corporation ("'Farmington")
and the TOWN OF CASTLE ROCJ(~ q Body Politic and Corponrte eCastle Roc;k:M) for ,be
P1,l'1'!;UC of 'Pl~. construainS. and tina.nci~g irnprgvements to Ash Street uKf surrounding
areas within Ihe City and TaWIl, including street, sanitary and storm sewers BIld related
improvem~t.s and 1"C:Solution ot o:::rt.Un anne;.cation and property tax j$SUc~.
.RECITALS
WHBR.SAS, fiUl'l"litlgtQn h~ II. ~Dl1,1tory c:.ity of the State: af Mit1.tlie$Ota and ~an rmercise aU
ofrhc: powers of. 3ta[utory ,ity; and
WHEREAS~ Cas de Ro..k is il tOW1\ of tho; StalIC of Minll~D1a lUld Ql(l ~~ciac ~1 of tbe
powers of a lOwn; an4
WHF.~P.AS, FatmlngtCln and Castle Rock hava been activeJy lnvolved in the: study and
review of certain PQtc:mial public: tmprnvet'Jtent project$ int;Judhlg rccohslNCrins A$h Strcct, the:
cqmU\1eD.Ol1 of Ph.ue 1U of the Pl'lirie Wilter'f'illY. CQrrec:ting or improving !t"tonn warer
IIlIlIlBjemeflt in the project Ilrtll, providing Al'\jt8ry sewu and watet sc:rvic;e to property C1wnuR
withita the b~ti.oa ~ea, and. atha' rclate4 illlprov.ernlSilts; aod .
WHEREAS. the public: improvement proj<<rll involve areas within. both junad.iclioDS 10
\Jaryin.g d.egr"li and the eol\5tN~on of'the n~allBry and beneiic,ial ~blic jmRrolt~tml15 may be
best a'~pli&h.ed tbrouJ,dl the cooperation ofFasmington and Cas,tic RD6.':k by srudying. financing,
c:onnNcUng. ope"uing ~ ~g the plJbJi~ imllrovltDl= projects; lUJd
WHEltEAS. FlJmlIngton and CUlIc Rock are _ntoring izu:o this Joint POWe'l"$ Asn=tmI~t
l() aud~ and provicle a feuibility repon ilddr~aing me fiftanc:lna. ~tnlctio". operation and
mauuen&nce of the.so publi, Improvements in ord<< to; (1) ted.uce. to th.e gr~tt'r p~"i~ ~tJml.
(hI;: public; "pit.al e:xp~iturcs the na:csW)' for the; idcnti cd inJprovemmts; (2) abate poU\ltion~
(3) ~aJ1tnd e;(~essive rates and volume of~nofP, (4) impr wiler q~eJ.ity; (S) pfGVetll tluoding
and erosion from surface tlows; (6) provide II. reliablo d ,afc :iOI.1rc;e of ~rinkina water: (7)
e:nh~t;a the public; lransponllllon and n.llld sy.toro __r't'in tbe area; (8) se.:ure l:SIl gth~ b~nef:itl,i
associated with the jrlentific:d potential public improve s; and (9) provide fur a ~lution of
property tax and lLItnQB.t1~n i:l~C:': PM i
.~ ~@6a-r~
0~!26!1999 08:47
sth &~;:
651-463-7737
q-l~w58; 14;45
Z~P NATCA
SEVERlSON sliElOON....
PAGE 02
4t):jl:ilU7;/# 4.1 0
i r.." ...,..,
f I'" .' I . .-, r-
: L'~':;~\ r:'.:/ 'lUU'
. .. , "'"
! :J[",:::':I' J'
, ~~. J
i '"'.
WllEREAS, F&CI'lll.Qgtan ~d Ca~l~ RQU agree to IWH~ in the C;;OSlS of preparing l\ ne......
f=oui.bility report with cal;b jurisdictiol:\ aar~ing to un~tc a share of the: co~l of prc:pllrins,
revi.awing Dnd dc:;V(;loping a nc;w project feasibility repc)Yl" :
AGREE~TOFT8E!t~
I
NOW, THEkEFO~ in 'Oni'iid&:tltlOn of 1he, mutual promises contained herein.
Farmington Uld C~tle RQCk a~ liS foUo..9; .
~lion 1. Pfai~ Descriotion. The Proj~ io be ~tudied indudes the recQJlstNctlon of
Ash SC'eet and the: cgnsrruCt.10fl ofP~s, III Qftbe Pmirie 'flatarway by the patties in cooperation
with Dakota ccum)', sanitary Elewe:r improva;ncrJtJ to PIlJ,*rtic.a in ,che Untnc:diatc 'Vicin,it)' of Ash
Strr:&rt. both withil'llU\d ou~idc the Cil'y lIS nCt;;e9Sl1ry. stO~ wiler improvt;;'l'nCQlJ in tbe drainage
1lIC3 within &lIe hydrogf.:Qlogic bQl.Iudulc, of the area, the provbion of pub6c;Iy supplied Qrinkinij
wiiLter io propenies within the area, and gthcr ~CIIII"y or rda.ttCI implOYQ11l;nb identified u pm
ot'thc prepuali~ Qfthe feuibili\)I r.;pon (all h~tan&fter rc{erred to as tb~ IIImpro:v~cnt$;It)
_ Section 2. le;.u[bility Ill;DCU1, Farmington and CUI~e Rock shall causa to be preparecl by
rhe:ir (c:spt:::to1ivc pll1fcssionlll ~~ rtgillotCfcd in. lh!ot Slate of Mit.rleiQm. it. r~ibilit)' repoft iUf
the p(oject. The Panies ma.y approve, reject, or require! ift'Icndcnents or modifications '0 ~hc
r~Qn as Ilpprcprialc. h~evet'. clli.c:::h piU1y mpst al~ptllhe feasibility repon prior to public;
hCllrings. Th~ PartiOill agree ~ taanin!ton &ha1I pnpU"e itha Ruibilisy r.port lbt Ihs (oBowing
improvancnts: I',
!he Parties a.s.ree that Cutle Roc;k sbaU ptepat9 lhel' fea.&ibilily report for' the roUowina
unprt;rVements; I .
Section J Resoonse to Feuib~lity LpoR, Afler ~repanttian of the Report. Fanningto"
and Cutle .Rock hateby agrac to hold 'uQ, public b~rin~:or ~il'Igs either jointly or separately
to discuss the l:OJ]5tlucQan and finan"l.ng ofthc Improvapents identified in the rc:::pon and may
joindy order 1he prepamion of Pl~ and 5peoifiClrtiCln~ or other do~t:I prior to jgintly
ordering any impravcmem.9' identified in the report. The e~eaution of this qteetnent bct~= thl:
two PartieJ doeJ not ~nnnit either party at this time t() tbol'laled imprOvements,
~!2.g.j"..r..~rth~ ,\ssq~ces. The Pai'tit!S llgree i'l rhey will in good faith Cltccute the
doc:u.melItf or la\(e other acdons as may r~y be ~ fOl" ea~ P~)t 10 Qilrry out il'
f(:.$pcCl:iyC obliga~ion:jl to coopera.tively prepare the Fcaalbl*" .Report,
!
j
_ Section S..!s:l.nzm!x..&J!5tll~{!~.~li2n, :Both lParties ~ L9 .;:oorab\alfl; prcpllrlltiun
of the FGlIliibilil)l R.q:aort through each jLlmd,iQtlon11j CI1pcsring repre8erlu.u'lrc:l. Both PartlCII
iJgr~ to sta.re i1\ me """st of preparing an updated F".asibl.(ity R~n to the;: most pn,aica1 cM~t
possible. Upon ~olflpl-=tioD and acc:cptanQll bft13c updated fcuibility kcpt)lt by bath jurisdiGtians,
eat=h party agn:c$ to PIlY its c;o3t of pt~...i~ the: \Ipdat~~ Feuibilit)' 'Report. Ho~wc. if the
project is ordered. th~ (;Qst Df th= Fea.i1;1mty Tlcpl;ln pr+nrtloJ\ witt be allocated according to
project co1'lStNccic;m all~BtiornJ. Failure to (ltd.... the p~ject dC'lllla not su'bjc;:el t::ithcr 'Party to
reimburse an)' loS! to the otber Party. ;
,
2
SOO BY:
4'-] ~-99 ':
____ . . . _ _ _~1';1.P J-I.fIJ.QA_.
14:~l:i ~ -, 'St:.\!tKSUN ~Ht:lJJU~
i
PAGE ~:? _
LlMt),LV {. ~ ~} . o' ,
24~t.~/,lj~2 .~8_: ~7...". 551,-,~~~:-n~'L,..
f-.............., ~
'i' .' ", \;' "":1';-;]
U..'.. -,oI1i \I. U'
~: . t -~ ~ i. \' .,-~
-.; 'I ,.. t" " I
.~ ....~, oc..J L:
#' ~l9Jl~. E-.setnjtut A(\Q.ui8itl~. In the ~~rt \~~ tbl:! lmptv'Wl;rm:'l1ls are jointl,v ord~r~.
F81miagton shall acqvir~> at its sol& ~osC and ~'l'l~npe. all 1.lB~~U3fy ellSl:lDCftlS. in. either
jurisdiction. u required by the llT1provemen~s- !
I
.. ~ection 7~..c.~sr.ruaion 9f.!mRro\'C.1Jl~:f. FIUmi~oJl will constrl.lct, at its sole: cost lrtd
expense. all IrnpfOvemctlls c~~ to UttJ$\!:.lmprov~'u unckr the j~ri5diclion of the County.
F~U1gton ,hall operate, rnaultlun and replUf the Imprcv~rne:rUs as feq,UJred.
i
_ Scc:tjpn 5. Ac~r;~ .!li! t.he Irtn:lrO'*~,~. Fanr~.on ~$ thilt Castll: Rock pro~ies
shall have a~ss t.o and. ~haU be Bllawed to "'h(lClk..up"I to the improvemebtll 'ltl any reasonttble
time. Callda Rock properties ghall pa)' "Pine l(nQ1l" type hook-up cha.rge~ indtJding offset of
~propriate cn::d1u. I
Jc:aion ~,._AnmtMlign ROd P.r.~perty TM. The P~ies ackOQwl=p thai Fanniagtou is in
need of hay;ng the frlWie Waterway Ph:a~c 111 oodtinue~ Ind Qornpletcd. l'hb pcr.rti~ulat
impl'Qvement is nOl able to ~ fo~ard withOllt thF coop~tion or CllUIe l'lDc:k, wbLeh
~cpera1ion Cutle Rock i. \"lilliog to prcM.d~, H.C)wev~. the Parties also acknowt~ge tbat in
1995 ~hen: wa$ a . lengthy and coS'tly aqne"atiQn pr~ceeding wherein Farmington proposed
8M.~ Castle ilQck property, '1'he Parties agree ~t th~ lmpr~enl.$ or access to die
impruvemenu will not mek., a.ay Castle lloc:~prape~y \.Ii~lln or ~urban in chlltlWter.
~~ ~ezf~,
FUrthlUt the lamelJ .agree 'LI'uu; (1) fur a penOdiof t~ ('20) yews from 8lJd IIflCf the:
dale of dli, AI!P'=m1U)l thtJ..~ will be no ~;atio~ of Cast'., 1tDck propertY iNtian:d. by
FlU'mil)gt\1n witbout 1he c:onsent of'Castle Rock, und (2)lln rhll: event tlmt Castle Raclt propcrt) i.
voluntatily annexed into the Cit)- of'Farn:U.ngto.ft then: (Bj CR91:Je !lock \ViU nteeiw 1000/. orall tax - fjJI.~;;", ~
payn'lQlt' for t~ )'ean fQUowing the anneutio.n; and tb) withoUt the l;:cnsen1 uf Cb"tle Rock, P '^'" ye T
F~n wilt not c;hMgc t~e use of the propert'J 1IJ1nrXfSd so ICl"l as the propil!ll'ty jtf rro~ding ~.
lIU: ...eun'outaeraeat to Castle 'Rode. i
I
~ection 1 O. Bltf#~ Afreentcrr\:. This Agreement! constitutes tbe entire agreement among
th. Parries and super.es all prior written and oral und~rtlranding,.
,
I .
Sec:tiQn 11. Ame!!dg)cnb. Arty 8.T'Jtendm~t to l~ Agreement or Walwr ttr modifications
ofils provisioq must in l1lI1iting JHl.d "gJ1ed by both Pani~$.
. I
Ss;ti~:m 12. E1[~ve Plte. TN$ Agrcenu:nlt is d,Fscti"fe when it has 'been. ueculed by both
Panics.
TN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Pmtll::' berel~ ha\'e cRCllt~d ,m., Al9'~t::n1 on the
date(.s) 'Shb'lJ/11 belOW'.
3
04/25/1999 08:47
t_.-. 2(.\-' 1 ~!;:I:::t. Il.',~ I ':.LMI.l
551-453-7737
r K,ur..:.1 U.......I.....U I~' '=-L-:",.'
. .
-
4-\3-S3; 14=41;
SENT BY:
CITY Of FARMINOTON
By:
Its: ~yc,
B1:__.
lts: City Clerk
~,?t1P J!(j.TS:~ - .
~S6N ,SHELOON-
PAGE 04
4"tl;JtHU'I:# ~I b
f7:" "-,
L/'. " > :'.'~ i......
., .. ! .... ..;)
'TOWN Of CA$lLE R.oCi...';~:~A~'~~.i jj
By: .
Its.: Chair
By;
Its: CJerk
4
Ash Street Committee Meeting
April 25, 1999
Present:
Al Angus, Norb Kuhn, Gordy Wichterman, Kevan Soderberg, Lacelle Cordes
Propertv Along Southeast Side of Hwv 50
Castle Rock recognizes that this area will be included in the project area, and that this area will
be serviced by City sewer and water. The issues still remain on the retention of the tax revenue
generated by this property. Castle Rock wishes to retain this revenue for a period of 10 years,
100%, after the completion of the project, and properties are annexed into the City of
Farmington.
Timeline for Properties to Hook Up
What is the City of Farmington's policy on properties to "hook up" to city services?
Would the City be willing to allow property owners more time to hook up?
Sanitary Sewer Trunk Line
What area is the City considering to be accessible to this line?
When the line is completed, how many households would this line service (total households)?
Would the City be willing to pick up more cost for trunk line?
Reasons: Elimination of lift stations
Middle Creek sanitary sewer line and Fairhills lift station
If treated as "trunk line," would it decrease assessments to houses?
Where would the connection be at the Sienna project?
Engineers
Castle Rock's Engineer gave Lee a conceptional plan for Prairie Waterway(?). Does Lee concur
if this works?
Could a cap of $30,000 be put on the cost of engineers developing a feasibility study?
Does Farmington agree to pay for any cost which goes above and beyond the set cap fee for their
engineering costs.
Commercial Area
Is the City of Farmington committed to keeping this area zoned commercial?
Prairie Waterway
If Castle Rock puts in waterway, they would like to retain control of property. Exceptions - see
#9.
Attachments: Revised Joint Powers Agreement - Castle Rock
Other points of discussion
Respectfully submitted,
Lacelle "Pete" Cordes
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmin~on.mn.us
I/a,
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato?-
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Trunk Highway 3 and Willow East Frontage Road Improvements -
Feasibility Report
DATE: May 3,1999
INTRODUCTION
Attached is the feasibility report for the Trunk Highway 3 (TH 3) and Willow Street east
frontage road project.
DISCUSSION
The improvements to the east frontage road along TH 3 at Willow Street are proposed to
address traffic and safety concerns at the intersection of the frontage road with the trunk
highway.
This project has been selected for funding through the Department of Transportation's
Municipal Agreement Program. In exchange for State funding on this project, the City
will need to accept the turnback of this frontage road from the State.
The completion of the frontage road improvements is also a condition of the plat for
Glenview Townhomes and Commercial Development. The Development contract for the
plat outlines the developer's responsibilities in relation to the project costs for the
frontage road improvements.
Two options for reconfiguring the frontage road intersection with TH 3 are presented in
the report. Both options include acquiring land from Wausau Lumber and the adjacent
property owner to the north, whose property is currently in Empire Township. The
selection of the option will depend on the outcome of the on-going negotiations with the
affected property owners. Right-of-way will need to be acquired from Wausau Lumber
and the property owner that owns the abandoned railroad right-of-way (currently in
Empire Township) north ofWausau for either option.
BUDGET IMPACT
The estimated project cost for the two options, not including costs for right-of-way
acquisition are outlined in the table below. It should be noted that the option selected
will depend upon the outcome of negotiation with the affected property owners. A
review of the options as outlined in the feasibility report will be presented at the Council
meeting.
Estimated Project Costs
Item
Option 1
Total Option 1
Estimated Cost
$92,000
$3.000
$95,000
Miscellaneous costs
Option 2
Total Option 2
$129,500
$3.000
$132,500
Miscellaneous costs
MnDOT has included this project in their Municipal Agreement Program and has
indicated that the State would fund $75,000 of the construction costs and $6,000 of the
construction engineering and inspection costs.
The remaining costs will be funded by the adjacent property owners that are currently in
the City. The development contract for Glenview Townhomes and Commercial
stipulates that the approval ofthe plat is conditioned on the following (Section 2c):
(that) the Developer pays $1000 per building permit issued for each of the first
forty-five townhome units, said amount to be held by an escrow agent mutually
agreed to by the parties for the purpose of paying a portion of the Developer's
obligation for necessary improvements to the east frontage road along Trunk
Highway 3. Interest on the escrow account will be payable to the Developer. No
additional building permits will be issued for any other units beyond the initial
forty-five until the Developer provides full payment or a surety acceptable to the
City for the full amount of the costs of the frontage road improvements based on
the estimated final project costs. The City will continue to pursue a cooperative
agreement with MnDOT in anticipation that MnDOT will participate in some
portion of the costs to improve the frontage road. The City agrees to make
reasonable efforts to assess or otherwise collect from other benefiting properties.
In the event that the City is unable to impose or collect from other properties, then
Developer shall pay the full cost of the improvements. In addition to any other
remedies for default by the Developer, the City may assess the full costs of the
frontage road improvements to any or all of the lots created by the Plat. The
improvement of the frontage road is hereby agreed by the parties to confer special
benefit to the Plat, and the Developer and any successors or assigns, waive any
procedural or substantive objection to assessments for the construction of frontage
road, including any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the property;
Wausau Lumber is the other property in the City adjacent to the improvements, and the
City will make reasonable efforts to assess Wausau for their proportionate share of the
project costs pursuant to M.S. 429 or other negotiated means.
ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt the attached resolution accepting the feasibility report, authorizing preparation of
plans and specifications and calling for a public hearing for the Trunk Highway 3 and
Willow Street east frontage road improvement project.
Respectfully submitted,
';z: 111~
Lee M. Mann, P .E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
Proposed RESOLUTION NO. R -99
ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT,
AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
PROJECT 99-02,
TH 3 AND WILLOW EAST FRONTAGE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington,
Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 3rd day of May, 1999 at 7:00 P.M.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
Member
introduced and Member seconded the following resolution:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution R53-98, adopted May 18, 1998, a preliminary report has been
prepared with reference to the following improvement:
Proi. No.
99-02
Description
East frontage road improvements
Location
Trunk Highway 3 and Willow Street
WHEREAS, this report was received by the Council on May 3rd, 1999; and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-
effective, and feasible.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota that:
1. The feasibility report is hereby accepted.
2. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the
assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement less right-of-way costs,
of $132,500.00.
3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 7th day of June, 1999, in the
Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:00 PM and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of
such hearing and improvement as required by law.
4. Glenn Cook is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and
specifications for the making of such improvement.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 3rd day of
May, 1999.
Attested to the 3rd day of May, 1999.
Mayor
(SEAL)
City Administrator/Clerk
Feasibility Report for
Trunk Highway 3
and Willow Street
East Frontage Road
Improvements
Farmington, Minnesota
April, 1999
File No. 141-99-105
j fI j Bonestroo
~ Rosene
ill Anderlik &
1 \J 1 Associates
Engineers & Architects
April 27, 1999
80nesrroo. Rosene. Anderl1k and ASSOCIates. Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer
PrinCipals: Otto G. Bonestroo. PE. . Joseph C. Anderlik. PE. . Marvin L. Sorvala. PE. .
Glenn R. Cook. PE. . Robert G. Schunicht. PE. . Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. .
Robert W. Rosene. P.E.. Richard E. Turner. PE. and Susan M. Eberlin. C.PA.. Senior Consultants
Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. . Keith A. Gordon. PE. . Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. .
Richard W. Foster. PE. . David O. loskota. PE. . Robert C. Russek. A.I.A. . Mark A. Hanson. PE. .
Michael T. Rautmann. PE. . Ted K.Field. PE. . Kenneth P Anderson. PE. . Mark R. Rolfs. PE. .
Sidney P Williamson. PE.. L.S. . Robert F. Kotsmith . Agnes M. Ring. Allan Rick Schmidt. PE.
Offices: St. Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St. Cloud. MN . Milwaukee. WI
Web site: www.bonestroo.com
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Re: Feasibility Report
TH 3 and Willow Street
Street Improvements
Our File No. 141-99-105
City Project No.
MNDOT Cooperative Agreement No.
Dear Mayor and Council:
Enclosed for your review is our TH 3 and Willow Street - Street Improvements Report. The
report addresses two options for the east frontage road realignment and intersection
improvements.
This report describes the TH 3 and Willow Street interscction and east frontage road alignment
improvements. They increase the intersection safety and thc realignment provides for greater
accessibility and improved traffic management. These improvemcnts are practical because the
Minnesota Department of Transportation has qualified the project for funding by the Cooperative
Agreement Program. Cost estimates for the proposal are presented in Appendix A.
We would be pleased to discuss this report further with the City Council or City staff at any
mutually convenient time.
Respectfully submitted,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
D~/~
Darren T. Amundsen
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I
am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws
of the State of Minnesota.
~~ /t U--
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
Date: April 27. 1999 Reg. No. 9451
2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, MN 55113 · 651-636-4600 · Fax: 651-636-1311
Table of Contents
Page No.
Letter of Transmittal
1.
Table of Contents
2.
Introduction
3.
Discussion
3.
Cost Estimates
5.
Project Financing
6.
Conclusions and Recommendations
7.
Appendix A - Figure 1 - Existing Conditions
Figure 2 - Alignment Option 1
Figure 3 - Alignment Option 2
Cost Estimates
Project Cost Tracking Sheets
Appendix B - Traffic Impact Analysis, Glenview Townhomes and Commercial Development
TH 3 and Willow Street - Street Improvements
2
Introduction
The City Council has requested this report to determine the feasibility of improving the
intersection of Trunk Highway 3 (TH 3) and the easterly frontage road at Willow Street. The
existing geometrics of the frontage road intersection with TH 3 do not meet standards and need
to be addressed. A traffic impact analysis was completed by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik &
Associates for the development and is included in Appendix B.
This report describes the existing conditions in the project area and outlines two geometric
options for the frontage road intersection with TH 3 that will improve the safety, accessibility,
and traffic management of the intersection.
Discussion
Backround
The existing frontage road alignment is shown in Figure 1. Willow Street intersects TH 3 from
the west, along with the TH 3 west frontage road. The east frontage road turns sharply to
intersect with the highway. Just prior to the sharp turn, the driveway to Wausau Lumber
intersects the east frontage road. Also, just south of the Willow Street intersection lies an
abandoned railroad grade. TH 3 may be upgraded to a divided highway north of this intersection
at some time in the future to accommodate traffic growth. Storm water drainage is currently
directed to two existing catch basins in the grass median between the frontage road and highway.
Water also flows north to the abandoned railroad ditch.
Street Improvements
Two options are proposed that will improve the intersection function and safety. The current
alignment does not provide sufficient length for vehicle stacking. Under both options, the
increased vehicle stacking length will provide a higher level of service for the projected traffic
volumes. The frontage road safety will be improved by moving conflict points further from the
trunk highway. Termination of the frontage road connection at County Road 72 improves the
safety at that intersection.
In addition, with both options, it is recommended that concrete curb and gutter be placed along
the east side of the frontage road in front of the future commercial properties. The existing
pavement would then be overlaid. The timing of this work would need to be coordinated with
the timing of the development.
TH 3 and Willow Street - Street Improvements
3
From a traffic engineering standpoint, Option 2 is the preferred option. However, both options
include acquiring land from Wausau Lumber and the adjacent property owner to the north, whose
property is currently in Empire Township. The final selection of the option will depend on the
outcome of negotiations with the affected property owners.
Option 1
The first option, shown in Figure 2, aligns the entrance to Wausau Lumber with Willow Street
west of Trunk Highway 3. The frontage road will intersect the entrance approximately 165 feet
from Trunk Highway 3 providing adequate vehicle storage. The south frontage road access to
County Road 72 and Trunk Highway 3 will be eliminated as shown.
Option 2
The geometrics of this option provide for a future alignment of Willow Street east of Trunk
Highway 3 along the abandoned railroad right-of-way. The frontage road will intersect Willow
Street approximately 170 feet from Trunk Highway 3 providing adequate vehicle storage. The
entrance to Wausau Lumber will be moved to the north side of the property as shown. As in
Option 1, the south frontage road access to County Road 72 and Trunk Highway 3 will be
eliminated.
Drainage
This section addresses drainage issues for both alignment options.
Option 1
Concrete curb and gutter will be placed only along the east side of the frontage road up to the
Wausau entrance. The frontage road will be designed for water to drain west to the grass area
between the highway and new frontage road. The entrance to Wausau Lumber will drain to the
north and south consistent with current drainage patterns.
Option 2
Concrete curb and gutter will be placed along the extension of Willow Street and the east side of
the frontage road as shown in Figure 3. New storm sewer will be placed to collect runoff from
the new road surface.
TH 3 and Willow Street - Street Improvements
4
Cost Estimates
The project costs for these improvements are outlined in this section. Estimated construction
costs are itemized in Appendix A. A summary of the estimated costs for the proposed
improvements is presented below. The costs presented include 10% for contingencies and 27%
for legal, engineering, and administration. Right-of-way acquisition costs are not included in the
estimated project costs below.
Estimated Proiect Costs
Item Estimated Cost
Option 1 $92,000
Miscellaneous costs $3.000
Total Option 1 $95,000
Option 2 $129,500
Miscellaneous costs $3.000
Total Option 2 $132,500
TH 3 and Willow Street - Street Improvements 5
Project Financing
As part of the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Municipal Cooperative Agreement
Program, the project is scheduled to receive $75,000 for construction costs and $6,000 for
construction engineering and inspection from the State.
The remaining construction, engineering, legal, administrative and right-of-way costs will be
allocated to the adjacent property owners. There are two properties adjacent to the improvements
that are in the City, Wausau Lumber and the Glenview Townhomes and Commercial plat. Project
costs will be allocated to the Glenview Townhomes and Commercial property in accordance with
the development contract for that plat. Project costs will be allocated to Wausau Lumber through
the Chapter 429 Special Assessment procedure.
TH 3 and Willow Street - Street Improvements
6
Conclusions and Recommendations
The proposed improvements described in this report are feasible and cost effective as they relate
to general engineering principals and construction procedures. The feasibility of the project as a
whole is subject to financial review. The improvements are necessary to address traffic and
safety issues as described in this report. Based on the information contained in this report, it is
recommended that:
1. This Report be adopted as the guide for the improvements to the east frontage
road along Trunk Highway 3 at Willow Street.
2. The City conduct a legal and fiscal review ofthe proposed project.
3. A Public hearing be held as required by Minnesota Statue 429. The property
owners adjacent to the roadway should be notified for hearing purposes;
4. The following schedule be implemented for the project:
The following is a tentative schedule for planning purposes:
Accept Feasibility Report/Call for Public May 3, 1999
Hearing/Authorize preparation of Plans and Specifications
Hold Public Hearing/Order project, Approve plans and June 7, 1999
specifications/Authorize advertisement for bids
Accept Bids/Award Contract July 19, 1999
Begin Construction August 2, 1999
Complete Construction September 1999
TH 3 and Willow Street - Street Improvements
7
Appendix A
s Cl
.,., ::0
GJ 51 ~
C -, :z:
;0 ... C'l
0
fTl 0 rn
0 n
....... . ~
a
II
-l'o -l .,., rrl
..... ;0 )>
./ C ;0 X
-l'o Z s: (f)
I ^ Z -I
<.D
<.D I GJ Z
~ --l GJ
r GJ 0
IT1 I Z
(/) ~ (")
./
-l'o ~ s: 0
to Z Z
<.D 0
v.J Z
0 fTl -I
tJ1 )>
./ (J) 0
0 Z 0
)> 0 Z
0 -l
./ )> (f)
;;0 ~
r'l
-0
0 r
:f r
G) 0
y> ~
0
:f
G) (J)
0 :-l
0
s:: (J)
~ --l
;0
fTl
fTl
-l
s:
lJ
;0
0
<
fTl
s:
fTl
Z
-l
(J)
f~C~
QD ~~6'8'
i o i(l) =:3
O~CDQ)
Iii). :::::: =:3 (j)
_~CDr:::t
m go g
:,/ />~:::~/'>:;j\ ~ .
/~' //>/' /').1 I
"/',' "'~,/ ,/ /'./'j "';r-,_~_..,7-.. " ,'1/
/,:'''::>/:: ' /,;:.,;/~///):~;>;'.,
" " ,'" ,'..,','~' " " " " ,',' j"
':6',/ /"/"', ,><,/,,<,//><@:./.!,t~.1 .
. / / /fb/ / / ,.1/ / /r-...,.. .<'.
__-'_'(' " ,I' ..y ,I' ,I' ,I' ......f......-\,I ,1 .:-.
'(' '\,\" "1 ,/,
.... II" /' 1(5,,1' ,,;',l : \,',,'1
:/ ,1/:." "/'1 I" V'''':
" / J' ,'" " ,
:..//-1, ,,/,/<! \')
! !// ,,"'T- /',," ,,"; \(~;;..~';.~
,i t",',....t:,I'",",/': '-f/>"---
v ,'. ,~,. ",./ ,I ..., ,...."
! !~:::~:::ri:.<>1 '-<;"::.
! 1,/ /~,/ ,/1
) r::;,:::r:~::::~::i
I r,/'/'t/'//:,,'I
J (/ /J///l
WI L LOW S ,------------ ,/::-:>,,/:/~<i .
/ I4i'> -<~'%,,/ )1:::::)', ".
\ ...// / " ~)Il>':' /), ~I
\ ./;/ // //' / /,-", V.V
...).-.-'1.._-,.....-r-,...--.,-/--'-:;;----"," ,',',,',' /' /' /~' /' ,., '~J .,v<-I:f ~vv~""
~. .~"7-.. / /, ' .. /. u /.' .' u' u / .......,.. - c' '" ;
,/// 7/ / // / / / / //:,// /// // // / / / 0/ // /)'>- ./ - v , .'
"/::'%://;/ / // /// /:,...;/ / //,//,// //.//../ / / / /,..;;"::: ' ..,./ ..J .' ..,::::'':->'.
/,///,:'/ //", "</~<'0<//"///'/"<'L/ /,> ////,>~,//,:,//<,<,</' /,~ ~ ',., .,::--/ Y:/:'<),>- .." J....~....~............-......i'~.;:.~c::.-::L.~-::~=.:-r.:::::--
, ", / ' /' """ , L' /"", /,/~' ,," ",.",. ,J.- ~ ......,~ -:'1_::1--
.. / / / / .. /, / / / / /.~' ..._...y . // / '. .. . . . " ~' / / ^.. -~.:< ",.--
_"-_~_-:.~:..!'-6::"'::'-.!- _~-_...-- -- . ." : 0;'"/ f.'-J...( ,/ / ,/ . ~/ .: ii!l 0( ,/ / ,(), -t" ~::.t:;,y"" -
. /; ~~ '\<,)W.<;/J, I!S 1 r/>.<~~ _~;.I;---
._. : />': r" /,:.r:/'1 - 1 _(<.:b'?7 /<..
V,/ /l CD r / / { /,1 --:t:'-F / / / / ,/ ,'-.'-
, ~,' ,/,A t'/ / / / / )-- V / ,//',' ,/:/7.?r7.-7-' -- '
I V//1 (/'/ //j I V///~'//.,,'l,(/~7/:777--- /7-""-T~~
I v':,/,/I r~,,/,,/1//: ~</~',/ ' {..~</ ,/,/ ",//" ,/,///,/,/'/1
"...." V//.V1 v//. /7'.... /, /, ,///////'
,"/1 V/ /. ~ v;.:; :. ;. ,,;,/;fj // /:::?CiLL:'L'/";"L/1
I" / " ~' / //.-J " / / / / / / / / " /......-- - - ,
V/' ,// .'; V///'////~- '!
:/,/A /',/...././1 It'/// ,,//_,.v 0 '
I' ,,' , ~ r ,I' ,," 'f'/ J ; r //' /./ ,v- ;
/ " v' / / ' /, M" / /, / 0 I
V/..1 ,////..-1 ,V. /// . i
;/'>//1 ~///.1!/i f>>:'~/ ' ,/' ._-. 0 :
V /., v'/ /)'>..1 '( // i
~" /':,1 CD "1// _~' ,9), 1 : / "-:/1 0 ;
f / / J ' / / ./. ; ... . "': // ' 0 0 I
j-'/ /1 ~/,/,/:' /1 ....' /,/i . 0 .
1/ //1 L/ //A')!~ 1 f/ / /1 . I
1// ,,1 r///~ .It/) 1 (~'//I &:
t",,',~ t//,/)\ :///1 .
I " " / ' , . " 1 /', .
,,~ ///;. I/'~~ ,"'",~~ ,6,111' , L/,/ /1 0 "
I , , , I /" +' 1 ' /,
J/~ ,,~ /JJ. r,/ /~ N,'" I r'~' //' '1' 0 '1
k//'" (,//'/t)l) 1 (" /1 . :
r/,/'),.- i"~//',,1 ,/,J, \ V'///!
, / /, -----1/ / '~/ /), . I 1 / / I 0
V/.~ r// / '/) , (//, . ,
,.. /.., (/ / . ..j'----'-K //' 0 !
1/'/'/1 (,/ /' / ,/,/1 V'/ /' 0 0 0 0 I
1/' / ,+-----.(" / '//1: / /i----------..!.t,/ /,), .
L,<,<,j l'//',/ ,. :? "I ,(/7),-1 0 tZ0 '
1'/..1 ,u' ~{ ,.' '" I
(, />:1 t>:>~/'< " :i 'i://~ '
l' / / I r / ,/ /. / ~ if// I :
1,,'/' /' /1 J,//,~ /' ~/~/ I :f //,/~: --.-.--.---.- '
,/ ",',,.t v:1/ /, ,// /1 ,: iV / /: .1.....
I " " r / / . / . : '1/ / ) -.-------
,,, / /'0 ,,, / / V /1 : if / /1 '
1.<,</1 //:/,<'<1/'/1 :(/'1
i<,//1 ~/"/'//1!f.f/j ~'//1
:/ ,/j' I I," "" "/,,,. :.s!.,") j}" ,/ ,1'1
f,' I r " ,~ , , %' .1"" I
V/ /1 ,////,v' ~ '1'//1
1//>1 ~r./ //J, ,/J, ~/,-<,'i
i/,/ /1 ,/ ,/ /1.)/,/ ) V,/ /:
:<//1 ,//~/:/ ':/;'1 ,,-//1
1/ ,,' ,,1 .....; ,~' /' ~~' :,' ", ,( ::.,' ,'/' ~'f
V'/) (,/ / ~i' '/') ~/, .1
:/// I V / " , / ' / / '
!/~:J. V'>>j:;. '$//\ t:,//1 '
',./'" 1 ~/</ ,,'-:/ :,:-:-,/1 CD ~<//1!
!/'/'), i////' ///) ///;'
I, ",'1 1'"",',,','" ,,~: ~~ II
: /,. I, / / " 'I ' / " (" ,
1~//1 r,.,~/"<,,, /,/,j t' ,/ II
L/'/'~~ ~/,/,// ~, //",1 V,j::J. I
i,<~~ j////'f //',1 2:><'), i
I///i (/,//' ,,/'/: ./ /) I'
1/ ,..,/ ,'/' ",// I ,,"-:,,1 ll-/,//Ja.
",,1 , //1' \/,~ ,,/,'r.
1/ ,//1 t',//,1!, (/ ~ P-'/ /11
V /,' :,,/ / ~ .'r ~//I "." / "11 .,'.
, I' ~ I 1/ / ,'~I I ' " II' I' I '"
V ,//1 V / / A' ~/,/ J i/ / /,[1
1""1",,/,'1 1,','1 I"'~"~'.J__
1,/ / / r / / /!. rV/ '0 :~ / / -r--------..
,/ //,~ v'/,/ A . ~' ,/j 1.( ,// .....L.
: " /~ ",L.,.. ~'~ "/,, t :+- ~/ /1 I -,/ ~~ ~
1_://; I///J.: I::: ~/), : r~'<'/1/ ,-- ----C}----------
l' ,,~',,~'I l,"',~,;'). V//1 . r,/, I ..'
:"/,..1 ~ r,,>//l" ,,//' r//1'
:/ /). ~> //11:+ r /;1 1// /i I
1/,) !- ,"//1 : r', i ,), / ,'I
f.;~ /1 k:> /~ ' j r:::::1 i{,>::~:l <:
t/ /1 ,///J,"~ ~,,/1 :'1//.' <:::
:///1 'o//1'/"r- 1/ /: (//) )>
j'///1 {//.l; 8 "t'</\ . 1)',/,/1
,,' ,,' ~1 .t /,' ,/.1 : I V' /'1 : 1,(// /'1 -<
//"1 k'/,//1:1 ,//1 ,@I//>l
/ ,/), r /,/ /; *' r,//'l: I)' ,//1
j//',j {///.i@ CD V/! f-r'/>i
k //,~ V /' "/,, /]1 '0/ ~ V ,/ /::..
., / / t I, / ,1 0 l' ': I 1/ ' .t..r.
:" ,~..... 1',,' /~ ,,I J fjl. + I ,/ I 1/ ,,' " Jl~
V<'1 ),//:/j ,0.. [//1 fl)~:,,':/l
,,'/' I- / ' /, ' ,,'1 ,'"
:1',"-: 1///1': v'/,' n//1
y/-,,' (,/,</~ t' V:/,i I-://l?
y,//1 1',/',/,/ ~ v//,i :;:',//1
/,/) t" ,/,/ ,/J. ,/ ,/" ~1'1 / "-- --
v/J. ,'/ ,'/1 r//I ,/,. ---'
I ,/~ ," I r //,/~, I I r:," ~/~\ t' ",~,
.,//1 V, / ,'~ " //1 ' /,--- -------
:k/",1 v:// /ltg k'//! ~i'</'"
::,. /) V'/,//I '0 1//'\ ,-;'///'
t/,/ i ~/ / ,/,/11 [,/,/ I v' ,/,;'
L/:./1 L'/'/"/'..1 r,///,i v' ,/,;'
,//1 ;///,)" ~//I ~'/,"
!,'~,~' ,,1 r' "" '~"",' : I 1 y",,,',/1 ~'I //!
,/ "',,J (I,' ,,',' I I' I" ~,' ,.1 ", ,"1
I ,,' ,,': ",' ,,' /,1 r ,,' ,~' ; 1)-' ," ':
," /' ,,1 I. // / ~ 0 ~'" : r / /,
, ,,~::: ~~, ~' ,'1 I + I" ,. 11'" ':
i>':,','~ ~,/~/:,/:~ to ( ,,":~ ~':/':~I
,I I' /1 r / / " A ~ ,,',, ~ I ~~ / I
'I" / /1~ ~/ / ,/,/,1' (,//, r /,/1
; v' ,.'..! I / ,,' ,//' , 1 1/ I' ~1 ~" " ,'k..
, V':-<J r.;:::(,/ /1 . (/,/,.; 1,(/)'''
~" /' ~/~. / "....: ',' /, I v / '
:!~::::~%:- .(;.<?~). ,.... t::,'/::~:;~i~~;j
V,/,' -,/ /../7~/~0 l,'~~ I tY<~
",7;..-r-,.-r-r:7-77-ep./:/:/"/,// //'/ /~//" / /~/ I:S l// ,/' ~; .1'/ /1
, / " / <:':/::0 ./, / , / / / .~/, </)':-0/1
~~0~~,d~'%~~~~~ . COGRD,7f '
/-...._<.(l.'~~,/ j/</' ////////)c,</:>>/" /,,<,/-<~.. ',,' " !3 , 0!3
_ ,. / ' / / ' / J: / ' / /' / ,'IT 0
V/////://.p///"/)/,~:>"~" . €I €I €I O!' ; :
:t 1m;/ 1:P 4//;%$..-:W/:7ff#/'T)-7?TTT'9. L \ €I
i ~'/::1 (.///>//;:~:,:'0/ /::,<'/;/>,'6j:<>-:/::'/~/":I~(.t--,~:,./~:':~:;:~~~/:"L">:>/~</_~<<~//~,:>:>,:~:~>/:7:7;T,,----------
'\//" '/" J' u.u .. u"? -+_..._c~~ .'U u/U //.
: r' /1 ~ '~' "";' u ... ,,, 'L ,..' ~~--_.'., u ..,
'"' ,) v/ '''''/'//' .'A'/"" .' /. __~_uU'
, ,'" ~" "J I,' ), ... / / / / / .,/..,,' /y.. . .. '. / 1'ilI -.< ------------
v' ,//i V,/ \. // / ,/,/ / // -;. ......1><1.;1.. "
, 1/ / -1 V//,( 1 \,' / /'}"",/ y/ . ~ .. ....... -I- ---0
i Va OV"').... i///'/..{'@ ,*,;j;... /~-: G~0
: I //,,,1 r'" ,," ,,1 r /'0"~': ,/,/ A. "I\"..e; ..._~_....=.... ..:'
"." u' v / ,u " '*' ,-------" ----.- ..
'(,//1 1,:.///1 I.' / //,//',),,: I 1ii __rro ....
. l~',' ~I ,,' ~~ I,' ~ " " , I .' ' · ,.
:r,'~' r/' v'U^' . ,
;V/..1 //; ,/////1' ' J
. I,' .,' A :,/ .," / ~~ ~/:,,",',',/ ,i'l I
, ~ .' " "1
WAUSAU
LUMBER
~
z
"
'~
--1',
;01
ci
Zl
^
IN
.... -
CITY OF FARMINGTON
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
Q
o
EJ
020-26
~
(]~
::I.
n
-I>- -l ~ 0
~ ;0
/' C ;0 -0
~
-I>- Z ~ -l
^ - 0
I Z
to GJ Z
to I
-l
~ GJ 0
r ~
fTI I Z
UJ :E:
/'
-I>- ?< ~
-
to Z
to tN Z
0 r'l
U1 )>
/' (/)
0 Z 0
)> 0
0 ~
/'
;0 :E:
fTI
-0
0 r
:::E r
Gl 0
YJ :E:
0
:::E
Gl (/)
-l
0
0
s:: (f)
s:: --I
;0
r'l
r'l
--I
~
lJ
;0
0
<
r'l
~
r'l
Z
--I
(/)
s I;)
'1 :;0
GJ 51 i!O
c -I :z:
;0 .... n
0 en
r'l 0
0 0
N . ~
&
.
f~C~
Av ~~~~
~ OCDCDQ)
i ~. ~ i (j)
~ "",,;:Ilf ;r
fit m go 8
::<,/:::,:~,~,::'i\ ~ .
// /-:,/,/ ,/ ,/~J ' .
/:/>::-</'!/<>J>,T;,"7,:/~;;/i:"
,',I ' , , /.,/,' .. ,".. ..,'.. " .. r,'
>:/<'<1/~</:>::-(->;;",:/,.::':l{ .
/ / /' / /f..6/' ,//' /1 / /~'r"">"'C. .,:.
"I.t-...':...(' ,/ " if ,/ ..,' ,/ ...,(-'''~ ,/ ....: ':-' <III!!!!!f. .
,'/ ~' , /1 1 r / '
_lIP Ii,',' ,',," 1..' ,1
:',' t' ,,'/' /; : {,,/\
1./ ,/{' //' ,../ A I ~ /...~
V;"" "....',..,! 'l"\o"
I' '/'" ",>, ,,'
:i ,/;///1 \/y
I,/'J:'// i ": ,>:....,
! L/' /W;.,,, ,/ f "'--:'.
;/>~' //::; '-.:' ,
'1 ,',' " ,I,
j.. ,/ ..,' I
'I V"~' /.?' / /,
~" ,,",.. ",/"..,/!
/ I,''''' " I
; v / t/ / /1
WILLOW S .' -.;j _,&i:J
( ./> /;--://.,~:-<
______ __)...r-,7~--,--,-~--;-)~/</',//</'/A ,</',
____'-7--/;'-:,-;1-;.' / ,7,/-/ ,/,/ / /' / / ,/ / ,/ / / ,/ /~ / /,
&//:~//:/; h<:::::::W;;:;:;:;;?
,</,/ /,,/,/,// /,/,/,,//',-/,/,/,/,,//,,/,//// /,/,,/ /,/,/ / '',- /.r6,<
/ ":/::/ ,/ ,/ / ,,// /Z / / t/ /_,(-..:-j--'-~~--L.,,~/ / ,/ '-Lx/ / / ,,;l'~/
_~_~..'c:_l_!:..L..'::-,(:.L-----,'-J_- ---- , . ~//>r:-~ -{/<-<~)5/
... V>::J. 'T/'<~,(-:-/
VI '/1'/" (I) ~</,/ /,/
.. I.. .. ~' ,
__-... I ..I',~ L" ..'' " '/,/
i r/ /'1 L<// / /
I f:::>) t~:'0:>/1:f:::1
I r,/," 1 :/' ,~.,'1
J'/,'l 1'" '19'/1
1/',,':'" !" ",", "/ --J
:,/,/,,-t L..,',' ,/l
1//) r' / /r/J
I ':" ,"f ~,///:"" 1" ,'/1
~/,,",,'1 L,;'",',,;;'J,I...,":
I/',,",/i L""""""J.'~/!
'/ .. ., I,' .. .. ,~,"
t,<<~ (I) . t/<T.it~~i
V,</1 ~-<,</j}" A......
,/ / " 1 " /~" )(~
1//,<,1 ~>/,//,/ ,i
t/~,/ ,A t ,," ,I' " ~~,~ ....
: " /; f' / / '~' 6), '.
!",/'// I ~/'//:'/:i "1' ..!
:/,,/ /'j :,/,/ //.. ~'l
I"~ //: ('//'/"'1' /1
:/,/ ..10-.._ r ,/,/ /:...' /:
/ ' /, -----;/ ' '%t/ 'A
,/',;",,'1 [,,,,",,,"',...." I /1
l":,,,",;'i r,;;",.,i'.. .. ':,i'
I' " -f ,. " ,',' .. "
!/,<+-----.I/,<,<,<f,~,
1>:0 ct::~::::~'::;)!:~
I,' /i " .. /' .. .. ..
:/ ,/,/1 I .. /'/ ,,/, .. ,~
1///1 r-~// l </ )
,,I' ,/ /1 r'/''',' t' ,/ l
[///1 />//'//1//1
1//"1 v/,</JJ./<1
1<,/ /1 [/ / / /'/'1"{/ J
1/0'/ I r,/' /' " " b,"1
I," I',"~',' %"
f/,'~ l'~'/," ,,Iv' ~
1,/,,' { Y," ,/"1 ,"1
:",' ,,"1 ~, / ,,' r " ,'1
,/,,< i/ //.//).
!>/,/,j ://,'~/,//; /,/,\
!/:,,",J. -- r ,,,~,,,':,," /~'/:1
!.-/,~,j r/ / ,/}$/'1
!-- / /1 r ,// //1'~/ /1
1/,,") r',,/ ,"/,,/ ,D//,'l
f ,,' / 1 ~,' ,,',' ,",' " ,"/1
:'///] 1,/,/',/,/ '//" ~
v /,,1 I~" ,,' ,I' ," , ,,'I
I," " J ,',,' ",,' ',' ,,I ,,1
I' / /, L"'" ",
/':,/:,)~ r~/://:":: I :,,~/'l
I/?a'/) Y/,// t //;
1'/",/', y',/'// /": /:,/1
,/ < '///,: ~"
,/ , /', t / / / ., , )
!/ / /1 f///~ I /1
V</1 1'//>1: , r/::1
i,///,/l r',,// /'1 '/ lo- //'1
1/,",11 ~",,/~ k,/.(
(, "1' 1/ / /'1 v' /,
,/// r'//,A ./,1
I , '.( 'I' / / I ~ Y "
!'::'</}.. r/',</J :...;;; 1,</1
I' "'-' r/' //, 10 r,' "
1,/',/',,1 r "//1/'1 r',/',j
, , '~ ,/ / /' , ~' /
1/:'/:'/' .... 1,//' //:~ ,+' :-,<,/1
1~',',1 jif///) 1//1
~,1:,/:/1 ,'//~/,,/ 1 . I V"/,1
f~/ /, r ,'/':,./: I ~/ ,,1
:/ A ('" / ,,/1 0 ://,/~
I //1 J/,/,'//i l:t. r,/"l
,'<;/) t>::>~ J g ~:-:::-:\
" ,/',,1 1/,1,~,/;~:, V,,<,i
I;-</j r<-</'1;J, 0t'/.!
. ",',,'1 )""",, "", ,'.( I Q) r' ,,~t
v/,~ "",/fV ',"
I,"~,'"~ J/' ,',', '0"~
l0' / ,1 ,////" 0 v,':
V A~ j"/ / / Jfj'+ ~ /,'
'I / ' 1/" //" ,0.. I " ,,1
v/1. j"<,<,, /1 r'//i
.1/ ,/ J v<'/'<<> I t'i [>;"j
....,'1 I' ,"1 . , ,I
:~'://:,1 r:/',,/:,/'J ~':,/:/!
t',,/,-l ,"','//'J. L.'/.l
~,/ /'). ~/;,/' // ,/ J ~/',/~l
1/;1//1 v~,/// 1+'0 1/.- \
'r,,"/ I v',/' /'1 6 r /'/' ~I
., /1 . / / " CO> t, /'
'I' ,~ V //11'0 1,'/ ,I
'C,/:/~~ k///:,/',/1 r,///~!
1/ /; ,//,//1 r," /,:
r ,,' ",: r ,I' "" """1 : r ", ,,' I
. (,//1 r:-/ '~"'/ , ,': (/,/\
:[~//1 !,,//) r>-:/;
I~ " '" ...' ,lot / /'
/,/ ,/J':;- ~/" ,/ /J '+ "// / ),
,I /,/1 l',""'//it~ I ,/..1
I~// 1 ~" //~ 0 j///I
;~/'//:~ ~,/',,"//,/'J I rl,/,/'/1
,,' "oy- ,,',',' "'1 ,',' .
'I' " I'! v'" ,/ I ~' , /1
:Vi ':"./1 rJ;;.1",':""" ""1 ; ~"'~/:'1
, /1 ,,'-/ ' ,'1 -oJ. , I' " J ~
V /) . ';/;/!li 1 I'~' v' / /1
.1/,<,: (///,.../;, V>'>f4
j,</,:1 . t<//;~'~U' ~ ,(/><-1 I
7--r--r--, ./>"._//;., //' / ,if/ '" I ///\
,/ / / ,/ ,~:77-Ep ,7 ,/,/ /// ,/ / / / .1/" / /'\~ C ,.D
::~;;:~:~:::>>:{1~<~/:~'<;>;:~::::0r:-:/'>/ ' _ 0 OR D . 7 L ·
" /L-,," ///)'// / /' //y ////, t:> 0 t:>
'. -L..,~'.(..L'4')// ,/ ,,/' ,/,/ /j,</,/////'/. ':T ''''' 0 ; , '
. 'lri/ / / ,/ / ,/,/,///.' / .,(",/,// ,,",/ /'v ' .' 0 0 0 0' ,. r.-. I. to:\
. /":>>>~:/' ///,,:./}* /:/:/,<<:>:>:>::r':/> /~/ - ,777,~;:::;;7- - ~T;r~'-;r;r-.r-,..'3t:!.--~' _:;! _ 0 ) 1\ V
, '" / " " .~'_./, "", ~/' ' , / ' // ' ~" , 7" ""'-""'7--'-~ \
! V':>::'1' '----:>:/0:>: -:;'O/:%,/:'/:':/~<1<>:>:;':'/ /~/~/ /~>:/<::~//?:,/ ,:/ <,/:::,;:--:::/;<:,<?7~7?::~'-----------
: }/' /'/'), \.,1,' ,,1' ,.t~/' ",,' "//0"C7" ,,' 1"// .,,J--- -, -- - __~_~_~_._.L_L-+_ _J~_LLLJ.':"/J/.L_'" ,/ / //",- / I" ",',1'
I / ) '/' I:~ / /' ,< / /, r ' ' /T -- - --.<--.,!. J-!.' , , "
i r///" \ /;::1'/ -1 r..; \; ,/ / ,// /', " / ,:/oFi r', ,-,..e. - - --.~-<'-.' --
""/), v/ j\;!;)..,///,.-.,.!.1,'#c. . . I
.r/'/1 :,'" \/./////7/T'~' ....../><3;J.,.
i t>'::-,~ v>,~,! 1 r:'0</:-:;;;>;;'V" ~ II"~ . .....-..J..... '~::G" ..0 ...~....-0
; v/i ot'Y~ V // ///'ID "" "" '*' -er- --''------ ':;;i
: V / ,,1 1" / ,1"1 V ,,/,, /: //1' ~ ,=-===.._.._........,..: -''''-.n
: / /: :/ /,-: 1./'/ / / / ':' ~ i 10 I
: ~, / /, ,'/ /) .' , " / /,,11: ' '
V / ,I V /, ' :/// / / j , '
I' ,'1 r, /'.1'1 """",,' ,', 1
v' / /1 ,/ / / ,..i i/ " " / /': J .
I " /' A r///' /' ) ~/~:/~/~::~,/~~ I
(?'l
oiC"'vv....,'l"Vyy""<
.,.,.r ,-.., ~
.,.,.,.. BRUSH t:} < --
..J"'''''''''' J< - .....-.:::.::::.. --
.r~ ,.,.,. __\:""...l- ---
.' "".....,.,........,.", <>.;-;-c::;-:1.-::.-::::.1'- -r::: -- --
,.,.,..,.,.,.,. _..::;:::;~--:::l_:::l-- --
","'-,..=-----
.r' -~----
--............. -
,
,
,
,
,
,
!
,
,
,
i
0'
~
,
!
WAUSAU
on
co
:;OZ
alO
IlI'fll
-f
1;)I'T1
c
-f
iT!
:;0
LUMBER
o
o
o
o
~
,
,
~
1
,
,.....
,
o
o
Ill'
o
~
:;0
.--
)>
-<
z
^
---y-----.
---'G)--------
I
~
)>
-<
IN
:;on
0'--
)>0
OUl
I'T1
...,
:;0
o
z
~
G'l
CllY OF FARMINGTON
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
QO
~ Ul al:;O
~-f~
)>~<
~51'T1
C
Ul
EJ
020-26
.f:>. -l ~ 0
;0
./ C ;0 lJ
~
.f:>. Z ~ -l
^ - 0
I Z
lO G') Z
lO :r
-l
~ G') 0 N
r
f"T1 :r Z
Vl :E
./
.f:>. ~ ~
lO Z
lO V-I Z
0 rr1
(J1 )>
./ (f)
0 Z 0
)> 0 -l
0
./ )>
;::0 :E
f"T1
-U
0 r
::E r
GJ 0
y> :E
0
::E
GJ (f)
0 :-l
0
~ (f)
~ -l
;0
rr1
fTl
-l
~
lJ
;0
0
<
fTl
~
fTl
Z
-l
(f)
5 c;')
OJ ~
G') 51 i!O
c '; :I:
;0 ... n
0 en
rr1 0
0 0
V-I , ~
a
.
I~=~
~ ~~~~
~ Q~(/):::J
O....CDQ)
Ei). ~:::s (/)
i' _~CD go
i mRo g
'" "./,,/,,/ ,./i j
/,/:,):/:.~,\ I I
, , " " " ,',' ",......... .-,<#....., .,'
/ / / /~/ / '/' -I;.,,--..---F/ / /1"
,/,,<,<,/,// ,/~'<' "/:,/"<,<,</'/<,,r,,,
///// ,///,1///"//1'
, ,/ " ,/,..' , ' ,,' ,/ ,/ ,,' ,/,..' .0,," J.':-~"-
///"/fb///"1///r--o:-. -.
.,.c-~,-...(", ,/ " iI ,,' " ,,' ..'(.....'...,' ,..\ .
-ow '~/:/ ,~:/</~,l I \/>,!
!//'1,;;;/>1 ! ~>,A~
:./ /"j./ ,../ ,/ ,: '<~i'" ....
; 1//,(" / /i v'\~
! k/J'~';<'! '(,,~:>
,I,;i 1-,' ,/~' ,l' I '-'''-c..-.
r,/ ,/ ,,' ",':
1':,/:' ~//:,A
'.' ,',f r:;f,' .1
I t/ <.j-"" /:
J : >/:/:r'::/~,/:i
, r,//t' //'
WILLOW S .' __.;-i $~
/ ///~,~~
. __--r-.L .,---__-,--;.-:;---/,/,/'/0',/ /'/',<,//
_77--r7e'-;'7// /7:-- / / / / / ;;/ :":' /; l >:
,/,'~:<;;:>::':/'-<::/<:>:>;)':>:>:/>::>:~//~'::<:<>::<:>:>:::':::,:::'~>"/;/
/ ",// / /// /'/,/,/,/,// ,/,/ /,//,/, ,/,//,//,/,/ / /,/ /' / "
//,.-://,/,//,// /,//'/,// ,//,/,/,//,(/'/,/// ,/ / ',' /y6/
~L~6~2>::'::::~~2~~:L,~~:~-:.t~'j.,~.~.,.-._~.'~~ --:, /0,,:'c:--<,~>:::~/::r,i::::' v' " ,/ -
---- /,/:/- (/',/ ,//. : I,/,,~..<y - -
r /,/1 )',/// ,/,,~.. -.M;t-Y7 ,- '-:>'"
t:</J CD [.,<-<,.1[/> ~;t:"-I V'///, ,'/:>;)7-'-' 7-'7--r-
r/ /'; I,/,//f,/" I t'////'/ ,'/'/,/,/::,;// /'/ /
r' ,/ ,/ J r /,/,.." ,"l ,...... .. : I"',' tffilj" ,ii" ,,' " ..,1/ ,,,/ ....' ..
v'/ /l Y / ~/ 0/), i " /,..-;/ -,....-,m-,' / , '
V' /), V/;' ,..../: ' v.///, / "'" / /// /
: ,//1 :,/ ,M /1 ~//~/ " "./~::,> //"", /""
I' / ," " , c>'/l / / , -'1' " / /, / ' '.
1//'/1 L//,/ /> 1 . (,/,/,/" ,/,/,/ ,/,/~.f:---
:/,/,;1 L// / '/ I I }",/,/,/ ~/,////
!,/,/ A ' / /1"",'/'1 ,r:,/,/,' ,/ ,:::-.,
I ..' .. ',A ,,/'//,.. " ,1 M',../"'/"" ,'"
, / / : r " /, ,/,1 : '/, ,'/ /
I" ,//1 ~"/,/..'r:/: It /,// /
,/ / '1 1/ / "1't./1 .' t~/ /1
!//<" :/ // !>:/1 I ( ,/(
l,/,/,~ (D... "f.'!~"<"~' ,9/7 i ~ / ./1
r,',' I ,','''' .~-r.l".'" .... (l)J/ ,..,:
1"',//1 ~/,/ /: '/1 I r /'/',:
,/ //1 ,/>//~Y1 ' r'/ /i
l,/' ,...' ,~ r,.. ,,//, ,/ ,~ ! r' ,/',/':
!//) r////,j\ 1(//1
/./,' i" ~ t',," ,"'",f.~ ,6..1 \. : f/,../ //:
i/'/; v//,;t,~ I}",',"
",//J 1// /;'~'I ',/,/
1/ //' r/ '/""!' /) It /,
i/,,'" ,1,..... r' ,/ ,..,..1,/ ': }/,,/
I / /, -----,/ '//:to /,,: ,I k'
r' ...." ,/1 :".." /' /,' / J
1/' ...." /1 r ....' ,..',.. , ..''
i,/:,,",,1 r:,"':'''''':,/'-,,,/,,/
V ,/ ,+-----y / / /14, / /
I " ,,''';' I" ", ,,' :?,.
,,' "/ J r',,',' ,": ~"I
1,<//1 V/<'~'/ ~
I,"~ " ,,1 I,"," ,/ ,,': ""'1
: ,/',," ,J ~", //,,,' ,,' ,,1
I"," J ,,"" L. ,",14
,,' " /' i"/" /.1" / j
i,/,/) v////;//:
i ,','",' ,,1 1,"':"~"',,/i~J.,",,'1
, " , I I"" / I'.jf1 ,1
!"/,, /1 ~, //' "/1' +/ ~
"':%1"', I,",' ,",,'.~"'l
II, , II " " , , ..... /1
/ " l~'/"/:V'/A
I ,I' ," ~ r / '''4/ / ," I
"/' /1 ~/ /",. / "I
j, ",',""1 ' ,":' : ",,,',1
://,; v/'~,'//"~
1/'" I ~, ,,' ,,',,' /","'1
: /"',,,1 -L'''/''/~' ;"" ,',
I;%:' ,1 ,/ / ,': ~,/,.o:
I ,/1 ~/,/, / z.," I
(/ 'I '/ / / "",//,
1/,,-:/1 r:,<,< ,,< ,,://1
I':>:/?' t>:>:>:>:~ '~/)
!' ,,' ,,"j ~", """,',,': ",,,',1
1'//1 ,<,/,,</ I </"
{ " ,'1.... r""",: ",,',(
I," ",'1 t' ,/ ,/ /' : I ,,, I
"'01':>/ ; (,::>:>:':+ '~,/:"1
:///' t///" / ,
!" /,,1 ~'/' """,, I ,/,/1
:,/ ," ~ II, ,/' ,/1 ),.,"/'1 '
I' /,,1 ,"'1', 1/ "
:,' " , I ," ,":/'1 r I" /' ,..
;,:: :: j ~:' ,:' /;' , > /~l
I',/~,,, ~ k",," ,I'). ~/ /'1
I"," ,/1 I ,"-/ " I 0 I " ,,1
" / A ~' ,/ / ,1 : + r/ "
:/ / ,l,... L/ /~/ ,+;:; r /:
I' / /, r / / , /0 ~//'
1,/:,/:/1 r',,":,~ 1/' /1
1,"/,' ,,1 ..... r',," ,,",,'1 I ~"" ,1
1-:>:::1 t>:::,~<J.: + ~/':~
.... " ': V"' ,,' J f ~",
f/~/' ,,/ / /: I L/ /':
:/,J, {' ,//,-']. 0 :.-/,/l
I ,I" J" /,/'1 1+ 1",1
j(>::1 t:-::>';j,T8 k::::\
" ,,~ .t /~/'J:l 1,,-' ,I'
/,',/'J .(-"," ,I"" :' I f,,/ ,,1
:'<,<~ [.' ,:///1 '* r~,/ ,!
.,'/1 //"f1~'CD r ,'I
~/ ,I' ,0( ",,"/' S ~,/ ,
;/,/j V/'//'" k%/ ~
~I '," --lot A
'/ ;,-- 1'" /j 0 + ' "
" ,/ I ~"///'''',/I t~.. ~..//'/'!
I' ,//1 1'/'/ / ,1 ~ ,,//1
" /,'1 " ,II' /1 I, ~,,,,I
" / J / / / /1 t' ,,',':
:1'"", ,'I I'" ", ",',1: ~'"",,,:
y/<,'j r:/;//<A. :/'/1
l/~/J ~/ /,<,~ ://1
:t:%1'/: V//, i ~ k>),
:'/ 'J v/ /1 t~ f/'//l
.t,,,1 f,/ /',/1 '0 1,/,,/,1
, / /, I' /,' /! 1 r ' /,
~" ,,' ,~ r" ,,' ,,' " .{ ~" ", "I
I," ",' ~ ~", ,,' "" ,,' If," ,,' ,I
r ,,' ,,I I I ,,' ", ", ,,1 : r ,,' ",)
1//,1 r/;0'/ " "'/...,
I"" I I""" I '" I" / ~
1/ ,',Il t',','" r " , ,
!,/,/ J ~/,/ /'1 0 /,/ ,J,
1,/ ,/1...... 1,/, ,/,,1 I + ~t," /,:
:' // ,,1....... r " / ,"/'l jO t /'1
.. i/,,"~,-f t':~":'/'" ,I' /1 ~ ' //~,/~
: r' ,,' ,,1..... r' ,"/ ,,/ '11' r ",',," J
:' / /, 1"/ / / / ' r" " /1
.r, ,'1 " ,', ,1 " ,'"
V,":,,1 ~/ ,,,' /' ,," A....: r' ,/',/) --
V/ ,,, .o///!fi" I.-$-.. (/,,',k
.V',//l (,,>//:'1'/. V,///I
'I,/,/,~"/,,<//~/,,UO? t/:;0/ 1 I
t,' , ., , , , 7. b, / ,-,
/'7)')'777"""-Y>';/ /// ,~/~-<",><, ~l< />~ ~ -
/// / /~' / ,< / / /, / / " / ,.( 'f / ,. ",' COR 0
/,.// /</' / /(,r/ /<'%':'/'/ //// v:,(,/',/'/ /
///// /////// ////////// .., , 0 ~ '
/ ,<Lu'//~'{/>~/ ,/,////',J/,-:,<,/'//' //'/ '+ '", to\ ' " , 0" ,
--L-.t_..q".t,'/,/,,...,""/"'/}//'''/' /,',:' ~ ^ ~ I,
"'{/',//,/,/,/,/,/~/"b/,/ ,/,//~v/,' I:J I:J 0 0: . 0 i: 0
oi(//////0lt////////,;7/07/,"':-7'7777~.}~:'-.--Q L \ '
i f::0{Y';;$/~fi~,(ddL%;(~$//;7/0-----
; V / j V///0:/:/// X,.. //4;' ~, -, '- -- - - :f-L/-,J---"L~J.//-0
: ,,/,'). v'/.'1/ ,($i.....' ,/,// ,/,,;' /(/d: . , ,('.... -<-, .-
, r /:>~ : / ,1 . V'/./ / / ,,'~7 //"'1 ......1><1... '
: (//) p //1 4 (,<///,/)'1 ..~.. .. .......'1"... ..\:::0 0 ...~ 0
! ~//) ~::,(../-1-.a (/%// ,/;'1-'6) ~ ~ ~ A1J''''' ......~~_.....- ... .. ..:':
; v/) ,/ h' .-/ /- / / /I. .. ,-----'" " ------". ~
:1/ / J :/ //1 1./ / / / I. ~ I CD R r
.' / /: r / /) v / / / / :/' I ' ' ;
,v//' f'''A V////i, ' ~....
: f/,/',.i ,//>) ;,/,/,//>(11
: I,' /' .,: r"",,,' / ,~ r/~:/'~/~:~,/;:i
---..
,
i
I
,
.
3
5'
::I
5
Q
3
~
n'
,
,
<~:'~?7':-::~
/ ,/ />>/ /:
"""",,"/,,,,~,'1
_~__L........-.I~".L....~
,
,
,
,
,
,
i
,
,
,
,
,
Vl"tJ
Cl;O
;o~
G 3::0
VlI4 0
~c
",
;0
on
co
;oz
mn
PI'~
--I
0'"
C
--I
--I
",
;0
G
o
o
o
o
or
1
LUMBER
WAUSAU
o
G
o
o
~
-',
"
~
----, "
:;01
cl
Zi
^
PI'
o
~
;0
r-
)>
-<
--In-----
--C}------
I
~
)>
-<
CITY OF FARMINGTON
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
~o
~Vlm;o
c-",
;0--13::
)>~<
~5'"
c
Vl
EJ
020-26
CITY OF FARMINGTON
TRUNK HIGHWAY 3 AND WILLOW STREET
EAST FRONTAGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
FILE NO. 141-99-105
Option 1
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA TE
EST. UNIT ESTIMATED
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST
Intersection Realignment
Remove bituminous pavement SY 2660 $ 2,00 $ 5,320
Remove gravel drive SY 95 2.00 190
Remove rail road tracks LF 170 10.00 1,700
Remove Tree EA 3 150.00 450
Common Excavation CY 785 10.00 7,850
Relocate hydt LS 1 2,000.00 2,000
On-site borrow (CV) CY 375 15.00 5,625
Class 5, aggregate base TN 1035 10.00 10,350
B618 concrete curb and gutter LF 330 7.00 2,310
Bituminous base TN 340 29.00 9,860
Bituminous wear TN 205 29.00 5,945
Bituminous material for tack coat GAL 115 1.00 115
Adjust casting EA 1 200.00 200
Salvage casting EA 1 150,00 150
Catch basin casting EA 1 300.00 300
Seeding AC 0.6 1,700,00 1,020
Subtotal $ 53,385
Curb and Overlay
B618 concrete curb and gutter LF 415 $ 7.00 $ 2,905
Mill bituminous pavement SY 375 2,00 750
Bituminous base TN 185 29.00 5,365
Bituminous wear TN 115 29.00 3,335
Estimated Construction Cost Subtotal $ 12,355
Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 65,740
Option 2
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA TE
EST. UNIT ESTIMATED
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST
Intersection Realignment
Remove bituminous pavement SY 2660 $ 2,00 $ 5,320
Remove gravel drive SY 95 2,00 190
Remove rail road tracks LF 330 10.00 3,300
Remove Tree EA 3 150.00 450
Clear and Grub LS 1 500.00 500
Common Excavation CY 940 10.00 9,400
On-site borrow (CV) CY 500 15.00 7,500
Relocate hydt LS 1 2,000.00 2,000
Connect to existing manhole EA 1 250.00 250
12" RCP, class 5 storm sewer LF 40 25,00 1,000
15" RCP, class 5 storm sewer LF 320 30.00 9,600
2'x3' catch basin EA 1 1,000.00 1,000
4' dia. storm sewer CBMH EA 1 1,200.00 1,200
Class 5, aggregate base TN 1240 10.00 12,400
B618 concrete curb and gutter LF 751 7.00 5,257
Bituminous base TN 243 29.00 7,047
Bituminous wear TN 405 29.00 11,745
Bituminous material for tack coat GAL 135 1,00 135
Adjust casting EA 1 200,00 200
Salvage casting EA 1 150.00 150
Catch basin casting EA 1 300,00 300
Seeding AC 0.7 1,700.00 1,190
Subtotal $ 80,134
Curb and Overlay
B618 concrete curb and gutter LF 415 $ 7.00 $ 2,905
Mill bituminous pavement SY 375 2.00 750
Bituminous base TN 185 29.00 5,365
Bituminous wear TN 115 29.00 3,335
Estimated Construction Cost Subtotal $ 12,355
Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 92,489
Preliminary
Project Cost Tracking
Project - Trunk Highway 3 and Willow frontage road
improvements - Option 1
Project No.- 99-02
Items Date Name of Company Cost
1. Construction Costs
Intersection $ 53,385.00
Curb and Overlay $ 12,355.00
Total Construction Costs $ 65,740,00
2. Contingencies (10 %) $ 6,574.00
(Contingences and Total Construction Costs) Subtotal = $ 72,314.00
3. Engineering, Legal, Administration (27%) $ 19,524.78
(Total of Items 1-3) Subtotal = $ 91,838.78
4. Soil Borings $ -
Subtotal = $
5. Survey WorK Estimate $ 2,000.00
Subtotal = $ 2,000.00
6. Wetland Delineation & Mitigation Estimate
Subtotal = $
7. Permits (list)
$
Subtotal = $
8. Change Orders $
Subtotal = $
9. Environmental Studies, testing and monitoring - EAW $
Subtotal = $
10. Testing Services Estimate $ 1.000.00
Subtotal = $ 1,000.00
11. Easement/Right of Way Acquisition
Subtotal = $
12. Demolition/moving
Subtotal = $
13. Outside Consultants $
Subtotal = $
14. SWCD - plats mainly - development cost NA
Subtotal = $
15. Street & Utility crew costs $
$
$
Subtotal = $
ITotal Estimated Project Cost =
$
94,838,78 I
Preliminary
Project Cost Tracking
Project - Trunk Highway 3 and Willow frontage road
improvements - Option 2
Project No.- 99-02
Project Description - Realignment of east frontage road along Trunk Highway 3
at Willow Street
Ilems Date Name of Company CosI
1. Construction Costs
$ 80,134.00
$ 12,355.00
Total Construction Costs $ 92,489.00
2. Contingencies (10 %) $ 9,248.90
(Contingences and Total Construction Costs) Subtotal = $ 101,737.90
3. Engineering, Legal, Administration (27%) $ 27,469.23
(Total of/tems 1-3) Subtotal = $ 129,207,13
4. Soil Borings $
Subtotal = $
5. Survey Wor1< Estimate $ 2,000.00
Subtotal = $ 2,000.00
6. Wetland Delineation & Mitigation Estimate
Subtotal = $
7. Permits (list)
$
Subtotal = $
8. Change Orders $
Subtotal = $
9. Environmental Studies, testing and monitoring - EAW $
Subtotal = $
10. Testing Services Estimate $ 1,000.00
Subtotal = $ 1,000.00
11. EesemenVRight of Way Acquisition
Subtotal = $
12. Demolition/moving
Subtotal = $
13. Oulside Consultants $
Subtotal = $
14. SWCD - plats mainty - development cost
Subtotal = $
15. Street & Utility crew costs $
$
$
Subtotal = $
ITotal Estimated Project Cost =
$ 132,207.131
Appendix B
TH 3 and Willow Street - Street Improvements
9
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Glenview Townhomes & Commercial Development
Prepared by
Bonestroo, Rosene, AnderIik & Associates
November 1998
Table of Contents
I. Introduction...... ....................... ..... ...... ......... .............................. ..... ............. 1
II. Existing Conditions................................................................... .................. 1
Roadway System.................................. ........................................................ 1.
Traffic Control................................................... ........................................... 4
Area Land Use.. ..... ................................ ......... .............. ................... ............4
Traffic Volume Data. ......... ......... ....... ......... .................... ............ ................ 4
III. Development Proposal............ ....... ............. ................ ............... ...... ........... 6
IV. Project Traffic Characteristics .......... ........ .............................. ..................... 6
Site Generated Traffic ............. ...... ........... ................ ...... ........... ........... ....... 6
Weekday P.M. Peak I:Iour ...... ..................................................................... 6
Site Generated Traffic Assignment ............................................................. 8
V. Cumulative Traffic Conditions.............. ...... ................. ........... ....... ........... 13
VI. Study Intersections/Roadway Segment Analysis ...................................... 15
VII. Improvement Recommendations................ ...... ........... .............. ................ 16
IX. Summary of Conclusions ........ .................................... ..... ........ ................. 16
Intersection Analysis & Mitigation.. ............................. ................... ......... 16
Figures
Figure 1 - Site Location .............................................................................. 2
Figure 2 - Roadway System........................................................................ 3
Figure 3 - 1995 Average Annual Daily Traffic Volumes........................... 5
Figure 4 - Concept Site Plan....................................................................... 7
Figure 5 - Townhome Development - Trip Directional Distribution ........ 9
Figure 6 - Commercial Development -Trip Directional Distribution ..... 10
Figure 7 - Townhome Development - Trip Generation Distribution....... 11
Figure 8 - Commercial Development - Trip Generation Distribution ..... 12
Figure 9 - Year 2000 Cumulative Traffic Volumes.................................. 14
Figure 10 - Proposed Frontage Road Realignment................................... 17
Tables
.
Table 1 - Trip Generation Rates ................................................................. 6
Table 2 - Year 2000 Site Generated Trips ................................................ 13
Table 3 - Year 2000 Levels of Service .....................................................15
1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to determine the traffic impacts of the proposed Glenview
Townhomes & Commercial development. The Glenview development will contain
approximately 89 townhomes and 24,000 square feet of commercial space. The proposed site
location (see Figure I) is part of the northeast quadrant of Trunk Highway (T.H.) 3 and County
Road 72 (213th Street West) in the City of Farmington. This report documents the potential
traffic impacts of the residential/commercial development on the stop-controlled intersections of
T.H. 3 at Willow Street and T.H. 3 at County Road (C.R.) 72. The potential traffic impacts of
the development are documented for the year 2000.
II. EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS
This section of the report provides a discussion of existing characteristics including the area
roadway system, land use, and traffic volume data.
A. Roadway System
The area roadway system, shown in Figure 2, consists of regional and local street facilities.
Following is a discussion of the roadways that would serve the proposed project generated traffic
flows.
T.H.3
T.H. 3 is an "A" minor arterial roadway providing for a north-south travel path from
Northfield to St. Paul. The roadway is a four-lane, divided highway from south of
Farmington until 900' north of C.R. 72 where it becomes a two-lane highway. T.H. 3
provides an exclusive left and right turn lane from the south and an exclusive left turn
lane from the north at the intersection with C.R. 72.
C.R.72
C.R. 72 is a collector roadway providing for an east-west travel path from T.H. 3 to T.H.
56. C.R. 72 is a 2-lane road in the vicinity of the proposed development. The roadway is
400' south of the proposed site. c.R. 72 is stop controlled at the intersection with T.H. 3.
T.H. 3 Frontage Road
The frontage road on the east side of T.H. 3 provides a north-south travel path from C.R.
72 to 950' north of C.R. 72 where it intersects T.H. 3. The frontage road is stop
controlled at the intersection with c.R. 72 and at the intersection with T.R. 3. The
frontage road is a 2-lane road.
.
1
rl
~
---.J -
. . ! i I ! I I . I' i . ____----.-::~
:--:.L1I1DEN: STREET, ; i i \-&---1-______-.. ____---- I
/,:~J ~ i :: Il':~ ~~::::eRO~oSE6coMME-~CIACSlTE
"l. .' :..:....:.... '_IJILLo.\lJIB[EL~'--: ____ V-,' \ PR~OSED rQWNH9ME SITE
~i .--i,-.
f1 L - - i i! III .L1)1JJ WI!
D ~.:WI.I,~. EE; [[]]!I,I.'..III . '1 :i'.'11 JJl' " 'I I
, N~'T~Eb) 't.LL ill ". I '. ! I ../)
D: Ll::J: III Oi5Q]]]~ I : i I f U1i ,,, -" !
8 ! : i i ! I iliLIJiTITTrrnrV ~ I: . I
j fj i !s11]tur~ DID ~ p . i I
: ! ill'. i I, tJ nTTT11. '.'.1 ,....OTD.c.-.J . rrm I- L-JJ !
...J ' l IILLL!.lJ'-.LlLJ Ul..L! L-..J .
OAK STR~trr " I lJIi1:tt,-
~, [[[] Hi! ~1lllT11 i j ! i C) FB~IIIII, i P~-=l~
, I I'll I ' j I ~t-!8tttj ~ f==1::=:~ r- I ...
lJ i!! Lll i i I,I"" . ll:ii Ii ! If') n i : . I . ',t I ,'! I ii I
~ju~f;-:-nf'ET . :.~ _ ' . ' , -.a:... ~
Ji5~1LJ.' ~jlW. [[I[[~.~rtlli ~~' i I I p;rq:j. '. I r: i I '. ,I
'l~i!I:I,in--rn'~' ,:::;, <I;~~'H'I.Rh,: :R
,..,"'L ,II'" C/) .' "M
-'-' 'w'ALNUT-STREE:'.!' _ i III i I [QTIJJ q
=.1 ,.IIlT! fl...' i...; .1 rmmm. . u~ltjoDlffl Y-V4
@g~u~o~~ ~ ': ~ L 'I'
=i hDW~! ;
3 tJucc...~---;! .~ I ... I I' '11
~-~ I' VI'
TI! ~ 1~9il ~ 'IHi ,
j.r. ill! ,BEEOf'
~. IHICKDRY r I . ~,~ST' ~8':.1'.' .~
,qDI' . L ,t;lll I'
-!~'---1H~ Id H~, !-~ ,- ;...
J.t:jUil1! CJi'ti..D ~: !~
----rwmm m' I r--:J, (
~OIJ I YI.
sL~'(~i ~-jV~~ i ~ I
I ,.tQ.. l \ ~ I IT\.. ~ F'.
I
I
--,
----.
-.J
: i
, !
,
.; 1
"../!--------_._----
; i. : ~ ..
- '-~ ---- ---
~
I
HiV, 50
;
i
Igure 1
Site Location
City of Farmington
-1
I
N
NO SCALE
~!
I !
i
, :
~~!
ji' --
I :
I
! ,
! .
! I
i I
II
i I
n
I, . I
I I
I CASTLE I
J[]j Bonestroo
Rosene
8 Anderlik &
.\1. Associates
) ~
V1ILLOVl ST.
-+
PINE ST.
~ ! l
MAIN ST.
-+
:r:
C.S.A.H. 50 I-
(ELM ST.)
Q
~O:::
V)w
<l:L:J
w<l:
(V) ~ .
-0
:1:;0:::
~lL.
d
...~
'VJ
<41
w~ "
M'"
M~~l
:i
~(7
(
72
1 t t (
(Y)
Figure 2
Roadway System
City of Farmington
!
I
NO SCALE
\
C.R. 72
~ Bonestroo
l1:li Rosene
~ Anderlik &
1\11 Associates
B. Traffic Control
The intersection capacity at two unsignalized in,tersections is analyzed in this study. The
intersections are the T.H. 3 frontage road with TH. 3 and T.H. 3 with C.R. 72. At both
intersections, T.H. 3 is not controlled and the cross street is controlled with a stop sign.
c. Area Land Use
The proposed development abuts the T.H.3 frontage road on the west of the property, so there is
no land use to the west. To the south and east, the development is next to single family homes,
while to the north, the development abuts a lumber distribution facility.
D. Traffic Volume Data
Turning movement counts were not available for the intersections analyzed in this report.
Turning movements were approximated for the intersections based on Farmington 1995 Average
Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) counts.
It is assumed that the p.m. peak hour volumes are higher than the a.m. peak hour volumes
because the time period people arrive home from work is more concentrated than the time period
people leave home for work. The 1995 AADT volumes are illustrated on Figure 3. These traffic
volumes will be utilized for the analyses that follow in this report.
4
I 1
!
0
0
<0
0)-
NO SCALE
\/ILLO\v' ST.
PINE ST,
o
1-0::::
V1
<I:W
wLJ
<I:
("')1-
Z
-0
I; 0::::
1-lL..
fv1AIN ST.
[,R, 72 1,800
(Y)
-
I
C.S.A,H. 50 r-
(ELtvl STJ
o
o
co
oi
SOURCE: CITY OF FARMINGTON
1997 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
igure 3
1995 Average Annual Daily Traffic Volumes
City of Farmington
. fl. Bonestroo
~ Rosene
8 Anderlik &
. \j. Associates
III. DEVELOPl\1ENT PROPOSAL
The land use for the proposed site is classified as residential condominium/townhouse and
shopping center. Figure 4 illustrates the proposed plat as developed by Bohlen Surveying &
Engineering, the site surveyor. The Glenview development is proposed to contain approximately
89 townhomes and 24,000 square feet of commercial space.
IV. PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
This section of the report will provide an analysis of the traffic generated by the proposed.
development and an assignment of that traffic to the existing roadway system.
A. Site Generated Traffic
It is assumed that the trip generation rates for the proposed Glenview Townhomes &
Commercial development will be similar to historic data from other "Residential
Condominiumffownhouse" and "Shopping Center" facilities. The p.m. peak hour trip rates from
the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Report. 6th Edition are included
in Table 1. This document is used throughout the country for estimating trips generated by
various land use types.
TABLE 1: TRIP GENERATION RATES
P.M. PEAK
HOUR TRIP
GENERATION
LAND USE TYPE UNIT RATE ENTERING EXITING
Shopping Center
1000 SQ. Ff 4.42 50% 50%
Residential
Condominium/ Dwelling 0.54 65% 35%
Townhouse Units
..
B. Weekday P.M. Peak Hour
Turning movements were approximated for the intersections ofT.H. 3 with C.R. 72 and the T.H.
3 frontage road because turning movement counts were not available for the intersections. 1995
AADT counts were available for T.H. 3 and C.R. 72 from the City of Farmington. There were
no traffic counts available for the T.H. 3 east Frontage Road. It is assumed that the volumes on
the frontage road are negligible because of the limited land use accessing the frontage road.
6
1
I
t\
I
NO SCALE
,;.~: -: ~...":..~:'..
GLE1VVIEW TOWivHOlvfE3 & COJlJj4ERCIAL
~ ;r.; :.;::~' '.
. '.
..~:2; ..~_..';1
'0""'-.' ..-~.';': -~..... - .....
" ._........f;,~ti. 'J!...' .
..~.._.... ... ...... ~::-c.~'::::-o~..,;.':. "":...!il
_ _IPW,.... ,..-l;'!'" ...". ...~... ~ ~...":1.:.,,,,-. ~ ..:1..._'!---=_
......~, . _.;.;f;:::....:: .:~,.,,::t\....*..::. -=~..",.-
~ ~ ,:,' .. ."". .""" ._,"~\. . ~\.:+~..'" ... *,,'11
I c.:....c. .. ,_ ':2ClC 2 ":,o"'~ . ~~ ~ ~ ::.n'I,~ ~l!~~~ 12 !:l,:" t-;.~:~..:.
;_..--...........''''...101- .~.;.:...- .. .. .:" 11 "'':-'":&'W;;-..a.Ir.;.,...!~.t -3" ~ ~ ?U.,:ts{ ,-~:.~._.... ...~,;.. .;'~"~I
I .~ .. ,...".,.,... .a'== .'... < .... "....,.'Iii'.. ,,", -, .----.
I: ji~,' t.~~f:t'~"~'!l~l ~'~'il'k'~,,~ '\. . . ~ {..:::.;..~~-:"~- ~..!'..:'<< ""~h 't"~lF:.t11. ~~i."''"-''''''-'"",
I '. i' -"" ..............~.......:~ ..: SO E.......... ~, I A:~ Co. ~., ..,.j . "''1.'':: : ",iO;~r~.~.Jr::~''lo.
. : 11 ,., . I"::, ~.~ -:"1 _""- . ,~.~...=1..,..""X.., It'"'iic.f. ,~~-f......... tr.:"~r1 .~~~ ~.;. II'. ...,. :~...".::~....
: .. f' .... "'l . I .....,.-,.. :!":.or <, -.' '~.<';;(:,j''('" ~~}or~ 't .....~"< ~-'''-~' ,Ill; t...~. J~ ",""::::w,,:.;~.~:t.,,,
'\S~:;--- _...!-~--- -..::"::';'"";'. _"t"'i"...i:::..:l;;;.........::.:;:.. ..~~u.-.::;..~:J. h-!i l...:t..L;~;:.:/.~-;::, i',r-:i~;-i~- .__:0=:':-..._ f~ ..~_..
.. .. ~ 'l::-l .... .... ,.. a . t. . _~ !lo. ~;. ....... :01 -y,' !'ol" 'I' ...' r.... 1: i - .. ... ~~:r
. g;~~ ,'t.:. 'i''''-''l~f...';v.tJL.:'' ~_~.. ~-.:.-..:. """..~.,. -'. ~.;,.:t.. l-.J,..-:.c.:..~..~.c:~... ~ii'V~~\l~%. :=E:C
. _ ,. ..._ .. . _~v yo. ....~!'1 ~'" I '" 0....-.. . ~ . "I~ :-..,
.. _.~. __ ..~:-r.i' _, .' ,,:,":"'n' ~.ir...,!.. ~ ~ .~. ~ .:..' ,'t.. 1\;" ,. ih_.! '~";"Ji:-... ;:I~ .
~I ~ =.: ".' \ " .!" ~....: .... ~ I."~~"-" ~~ .....".,'~ t 'i r--~"l"r''''"t~'i~!l. !'; l;~ .
"" . ...,.,. .... ..... .. "1 ....J';;: '. J..... '. . .~..,,: J' =.. . '. I I' \-..::..." --"
.:~; ;~ ~ ~:!i~~i:-tf: .~~i:i;'~;-.~: :'~..~_' "_:" .: .:--:_:l-""~ ~:'...............-...~-::; :..t.:::..:..~~.
IS . .. il......It~.o""""" ''4-.:;' f.,.;~' ..J . . ......,. "'.~ .,'.. ~. -:;j).
J ,. .~.: ;: t':::.1":--1-~: '.I.tl"-;~;:"';r.t- :;.tL~.:_~: ...._.....~~.J.. "t".;r. ~:....':~';........".........'....,..:-......~i -.,..
L . . t .,'- .t, . h..... . ,.' , I, .-.1iTI., - r:_ .........,.,_.. ~., .. ......... ....-...... -~.,.." . 'J' .
~ ; : t:: :J;:;: r2~~ :-~~.- : ;:r:?r~~ ~.~ t. il '~\~ '~'~1'11\'1; ~: '~ll"ll"~: ';. ~;..\: .~;.~~. .'- .... :~~:>~
. i I ........ ....~~"j ....!i','\.-=............l.""_.=;;-r.....-.......-"~-==.""...~... '!:~~:.. :-:.-:'\.:..'t.
_"' . ...... .. ~.._.I ," ';,';{~:'.' .~~:;;:_.;-..::.:.~.~,..:..":'-...:-:; .. ~:..,:-" ..::.--:;:.-.-;.. .-. ',%' -r::..~5.\;U;-1:.."'~~
==E~7_:' -,.:;:.;.,:::,~~-,_.-;;"..::;::::.=-..::.-=.: ~:-. ===;::;::,::::..-:-...::=.:=-.::-'.-' .--. --,.
~-:.::-----::::-:;.--_..._--"- "'_.~"
..-' ..-..'
'..
;.~~~
..
'n
.._.- _..' .....,....:.......tt?'l .... -......---..
"..:..."
'.ol"'lll.i
--:..:::;;-
::.:::.~::::::':::::~~-:'::". - ............-" '-- ,... -.. ........-.
r~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~
...._~_........-.-14_... - _"'... _C"_ -----
~~i~~~i:~~~~~~.
;;:;;.c;::__-
-.0-'--
...-...-...t_"..,..<I.--..---.... --"
.-"'-
'-..
-'--'.
--..-.
.-:...-- .n....
...1'I01'.....~....
E:::~.;.::==-..._..__...._,._.._"...,--'-
=.:;:-::::=.:-- -
-.--'--.-
Il1o__.....__ ...__..~._...._..J_
-~-
--"-
_.._....c...C'....."..---..
:::.-:-.:.-==~~..:'=.==-.::.:.~-~.:'.:~::::::.::::....
:=-~::.--'==-"~~..::-..__..._..-_:_I
-.-.-"""
--
---
~._-"":-"""""",,,---~"-'--"-
--'"""..-
.....t__
:.::.-:"..::.-=..........=~.::.:'==4=::::-'.~--
cr.."oo...........
~=__..=..~_........ ."4_ ._._
:--~~i=-._
T~':.:.:-.:.
--_.....~,.
"--r=.-,:::-'"
"-;,.:-.-=:-' .
c;-.r__-G:';:;"
~.:..:-...-==-='.::::".::-=';== ..:-:="'.:-"':
=:::::-,:==:.~'":.:::,,~_:::'~':::'''::'~=~:'':..--:~':;'::
------..-..-.-...........-.- .-....-- _..--
~_....- ~--_...._.-.._.-<.- ...._--".~...._...
c..~~
-~....-
r t.a:..
I ......,u,. "","p_.
1 ;:. ~~ 'r ;~.
....."01..........
-.......-----
:....-=::--.::.=----- .-......---..-....
~.:::.:....__ ."-:7
c--~-
Figure 4
Concept Site Plan
J[]A Bonestroo
-=- Rosene
~ Anderlik &
. \J. Associates
City of Farmington
It is ,assumed that the peak hour traffic volumes consist of 9 percent of the AADT. It is also
assumed that 40 percent of the traffic volumes are leaving Farmington during the p.m. peak hour
and 60 percent of the traffic volumes are coming to Farmington during the p.m. peak hour. This
60/40 split assumes most of the traffic using the trunk highways are commuters who work in the
Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area. The turning movement percentages for the T.H. 3/C.R.
72 intersection are approximated as:
. Southbound T.R. 3: 95% through, 5% left
. Northbound T.R. 3: 5% right, 95% through
. Westbound C.R. 72: 50% right, 50% left
All of the traffic counts were factored with a 2% cumulative growth rate to extrapolate base
traffic volumes for the year 2000. This growth rate reflects the increase in traffic from
developments and communities outside of the study area that travel through the area.
c. Site Generated Traffic Assignment
It is assumed that approximately 49% of the trips generated by the proposed commercial
development and 35% of the townhome development will access the facility from the north. It is
also assumed that approximately 48% of the trips generated by the proposed commercial
development and 49% of the townhome development will access the facility from the south. The
other trips will access the development from the east and west, not utilizing T.R. 3. It is also
assumed that 10% of the trips generated by the commercial development are included in the trips
generated by the townhome development. The assumed trip directional distribution percentages
for the developments are shown in Figure 5 and 6.
The trip directional distribution percentages in Figures 5 and 6 are multiplied with the trip
generation rates in Table 1 to approximate the development generated trip generation
distributions. Figures 7 and 8 show the approximated trip generation distributions.
8
I
~t
\.fILLO\./ ST.
1%
PINE ST,
o
f-~
(/)
<(w
wLJ
<(
("')1-
Z
,0
:r:;~
f-w..
tvIAIN ST,
[,R, 72
(Y)
C.S,A.H. 50
(ELM ST,)
-
I
f--
;t
Figure 5
Townhome Development
Trip Directional Distribution Assumption
City of Farmington
1
,
!
I
NO SCALE
2%
-
JL]j Bonestroo
-=- Rosene
~ Anderlik &
,\1, Associates
~t
1
I
NO SCALE
\.JILLOW' ST.
-
1%
PINE ST.
o
~n:::
v.lw
<[LJ
w<[
M~
Z
.0
:r;n:::
~w...
10% Commercial traffic
Is townhome traffic.
tvlAIN ST,
5%
-
C.R, 72
(Y)
C,S,A.H, 50
(ELM STJ
I
I-
~t
Figure 6
Commercial Development
Trip Directional Distribution Assumption
City of Farmington
~ Bonestroo
-=- Rosene
~ Anderlik &
. \J' Associates
I
r
C')
....
\.
\.fI L L Ii \,,/ ST.
NO SCALE
'--7
,-2
(
C')
PINE ST.
o
1-0::
~w
wL:)
<I:
(")1-
Z
-.:0
.2.,0::
I-L....
C')
\.
'--2
,-6
MAIN ST.
[.R. .2
(
t'l
....
M
I
C.S.A,H, 50
(ELM ST,)
-
f-
Figure 7
Townhome Development
Trip Generation Distribution - P.M. Peak Hour
City of Farmington
~ Bonestroo
-=- Rosene
"" Anderlik &
1\J1 Associates
~
!
j
t
\.fILLO\.J ST.
1-
'-16
-1
,,-3
NO SCALE
(
C')
PINE ST,
o
r-OC
CI1W
<I:L:J
w<I:
(")r-
Z
,0
:r;oc
r-~
C')
~
'-3
,,-24
MAIN ST,
[,R, 72
(
~
(Y)
C.S.A,H, 50
(ELM ST,)
I
f-
'7igu re 8
Commercial Development
Trip Generation Distribution - P.M. Peak Hour
City of Farmington
J[lj Bonestroo
-=- Rosene
~ Anderlik &
. \J. Associates
v. CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
This study analyzes the impacts of opening a 24,000 square foot shopping center and 89
townhomes in the year 2000. The estimated p.m. peak hour trips generated for the year 2000 are
shown in Table 2. The estimated cumulative traffic in the year 2000 for the two study
intersections, including the trips generated by the proposed townhome and commercial
development, are shown on Figure 9.
TABLE 2: YEAR 2000 SITE GENERATED TRIPS (p.M. PEAK HOUR)
P.M. PEAK
HOUR VEIDCLES VEIDCLES
SITE SIZE VOLUMES ENTERING EXITING
Shopping
Center 24 (l,OOO's of 106 53 53
SQ. FT.)
Residential ,
Condominium! 89 (Units) 48 31 17
Townhouse
.
13
I
co
COQ)
T~
'w' ILL 0\./ ST.
1-
PINE ST.
Ol
~~
J ,
MAIN ST.
C.S,A.H, 50
(ELM STJ
f
N.
I '
NO SCALE
t::lO
"I'
Q
1-0:::
(/)
<[LJ
wLJ
<
(')1-
Z
.0
:I; 0:::
I-L
'-41
.,;-66
C,R, 72
t (
1e18
CO)
M
I
I-
n Bonestroo
Jl:II Rosene
~ Anderlik &
. \j. Associates
':-igu re 9
Year 2000 Cumulative Traffic Volumes -
P.M. Peak Hour
City of Farm ington
VI. STUDY INTERSECTIONS/ROAUW A Y SEGMENT ANAL tSIS
Calculating the capacity of each study intersection is required to analyze the ability of the
intersection to accommodate the vehicles. that utilize it. The volume of traffic using an
intersection divided by the capacity of the intersection provides a numerical value that can be
translated into an intersection level of service. '
The capacity of a roadway facility or intersection is defined in the Hi~hway Capacitv Manuall as
"the maximum hourly rate at which persons or vehicles can reasonably be expected to traverse a
point or uniform section of a lane or roadway during a given time period under:prevailing
roadway, traffic, and control conditions."
Capacity of a roadway, a traffic lane, or an intersection can be expressed in vehicles per hour or .
in average delay. Once the capacity of a facility is calculated, a qualitative measure called level
of service (LOS) can be identified. The level of service of an intersection is a measure of the
ability of the intersection to accommodate traffic volumes. Level of service for intersections
ranges from A, which indicates free flow or excellent conditions, to F which indicates forced
flow or overflow conditions.
The level of service has been calculated for each key intersection using the Highway Capacity
Software (HCS). The Highway Capacity Software was developed using the procedures
contained in the Highway Capacity Manual. The cumulative traffic volumes shown in Figure 9
were used to perform intersection capacity analysis at each of the two study intersections. Levels
of service have been calculated for each key intersection in the year 2000. The results are
contained in Table 3.
TABLE 3: YEAR 2000 LEVELS OF SERVICE - P.M. PEAK HOUR
LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH
INTERSECTION CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS
T.H. 3 and C.R. 72 A
T.H. 3 and Frontage Road A
The operation of the intersections along the T.H. 3 east Frontage Road will not significantly
deteriorate due to increased traffic volumes caused by the Glenview development.
I Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1994.
15
VII. IMPROVEl\1ENT RECOlVIl\tlENDA TIONS
Construction of the Glenview Townhomes & CommerCial development is expected to be
complete in the year 2000. The level of service analysis ind~cates that all of the intersections will
operate at acceptable levels when the development is complete in the year 2000 if the estimated
volumes do in fact occur.
Although the level of service of the T.H. 3/C.R. 72 intersection will. not be impacted by the
development, the safety of the intersection is a major concern. The froIltage road intersects C.R.
72 at the intersection of T.H. 3 and C.R. 72 (see Figure 2). The current intersection
configuration has toO many conflict points to safely handle the added development traffic. The
two options to improve the situation are (1) close the frontage road access to c.R. 72 or (2) move
the intersection east at least 100 feet. There are currently single family homes on the north side
of C.R. 72. These homes make the intersection relocation relatively expensive. We recommend
closing the T.H. 3 Frontage Road intersection with C.R. 72.
The intersection of the T.H. 3 Frontage Road with T.R. 3 should be improved. The current
situation provides little vehicle storage at the perpendicular intersection. The intersection could
be improved by moving the access back 100 feet. The City has approached MnlDOT about
participating in the improvements previously discussed. MnlDOT is reviewing the proposal and
will determine in February if they will participate in the costs of the improvement. The proposed
preliminary layout is shown in figure 10.
IX. SUMl\tIARY OF CONCLUSIONS
This section of the report summarizes the results and conclusions of the future traffic conditions
for the proposed Glenview Townhomes & Commercial development in FarmingtoI).. The project
is assumed to be operational in the year 2000.
A. Intersection Analysis & Mitigation
Two study intersections were analyzed to approximate the traffic conditions when the proposed
develoPI!1ent is complete in the year 2000.
The year 2000 conditions involved increasing existing volumes by two percent per year to
account for regional growth. Added to this were volumes generated by the proposed townhome
and commercial development. The study intersections were then analyzed for these 2000
conditions utilizing existing traffic control and lane configurations. Neither of the study
intersections exceed capacity in this scenario.
As part of the proposed development, the T.R. 3 east frontage road access should be closed at
C.R. 72 and realigned at the intersection with T.H. 3. These recommended safety improvements
are shown on Figure 10.
16
.f
,':'~.:;'::':'-
......
!...
.....-.
I:: . ,.!_ ...... ,.', '
.' i~ ~~! "i r1J'1 "', ~ ~}". ),~;,,, i
...... ..' .":.:~ I,.' 1 "'7 '
~\J rd. EY . l
,.... '''', ,...,~ ,...
m~!'I\~;~+:~i,}-' L__._____
,. ," ~..., .1.'
Ll iWj.i ~'!l
"'. i.....' i .t.,
im ::~~~i ~l~
PINE ST....._ hJ '~~~:f:l" ,hJ. >0'
__._M._..___.____._.._.__.. i }--'~1 "I;~~' ~~,"i :~~11<
~~~l':~~;~il'ii !J~W~1 f,i~
i "', ~,'1 ,."" ..",:W
i
I
I
.-..--.~.-M-~.P-l ..-.-...-.-l
l:i
!~
i
.........,.,....-...-.,....-----j
, . I
I :::-: ~,~~:1 i:'~ t:-:: I
~...-~ r----~ R Fl f~\:) ~ r r{ ~ ~~ 1
r'" L I 1 ,..) ~ '. -:: . ,..., t... ~ I
"--"\._..l L......._j! ~:.:l :~~f:~ t;';i f:l
"AIN ST I .. . 1 : d'" "', I ~'.
M ~ , :::.: ': ~ ~ ~ ~ (. " '. ~;. I '-.-.. I r,
~~-== _)i:~~~~\~~~5~~=~i:~==: -
I .. ,. . I ,...t !:~,' "";1~ T CO RD, 72
' I 'I , ,. "'I I,], ", ,. ..
" . i I ,,'" ,'" , "~". ..
i ! q r I :~~:: :~'~i i'~.'t.}"Y i
'-.._.J I: : :. .:.: J:.:c1 .. ..~;~Jl i
1
I
NO SCALE
FRONTAGE ROAD RE-ALlGNMENT
ACCESS TO WAUSAU LUMBER
r')
Figure 10
Proposed Frontage Road
Realignment
City of Farmington
. fl. Bonestroo
~ Rosene
8 Anderlik &
'IJ' Associates
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/O?a-
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
City AdministratoyJ~e..
FROM: David L. Olson
Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) - Adult Uses
DATE: May 3,1999
INTRODUCTION
As a result of issues that have been raised in a number of cities in the area regarding the
establishment of adult uses, staff has reviewed City ordinances that currently regulate
adult uses. The following is a summary of this review.
DISCUSSION
The City currently regulates adult uses involving nudity in premises that are licensed to
sell intoxicating or non-intoxicating liquor (Ordinance 3-13 copy attached). However
there presently are no ordinances regulating adult type uses in establishments that do not
involve the sale of liquor. These types of adult use establishments have been opened in
several other communities.
If the City Council wishes to consider an ordinance to regulate this type of use, it will
take some time to prepare. Therefore, it is recommended that Council consider the
adoption of an Interim Ordinance that establishes a moratorium on any of these types of
uses being established in the City prior to the City establishing a final ordinance
regulating this use. To facilitate this goal, it is recommended that an interim ordinance
establishing a moratorium for six months be adopted to allow for the preparation and
adoption of the necessary ordinance amendments.
The City Attorney has prepared the attached Interim Ordinance that enacts a moratorium
on the establishment of any adult use type businesses for a period of six months. If
necessary, the Council could extend this moratorium as needed.
BUDGET IMP ACT
None
ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt the attached Interim Ordinance establishing a moratorium for six months on the
establishment of any adult use type business in the City of Farmington.
Respectfully submitted,
;;;/~~
David L. Olson
Community Development Director
3-13-1
3-13-2
CHAPTER 13
PROHIBITING NUDITY IN liQUOR ESTABLISHMENTS
SECTION:
3-13-1 :
3-13-2:
3-13-3:
3-13-4:
Purpose
Definition
Prohibited Acts
Violation
3-1 3-1 :
PURPOSE:
(A)
The City hereby ordains that it is in the best interest of the public
health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City that
"nudity", as defined in this Chapter, be prohibited upon the premises
of licensed intoxicating liquor, nonintoxicating malt liquor, and bottle
club establishments so as to best protect and assist the owners and
operators and employees of these premises, as well as patrons and
the public in general.
..,/
(B) The City ordains that the standards herein are reflective of the
prevailing community standards of the City. This Chapter is intended
to prevent harm stemming from the physical immediacy and
combination of alcohol, nudity and sex. The City also desires to
prevent any subliminal endorsement of sexual harassment and the
City also finds that these activities may increase various criminal
conduct such as prostitution, sexual assault, and disorderly conduct.
(Ord. 095-349, 2-21-95)
3-13-2: DEFINITION: For purposes of this Chapter, "nudity" means
the showing of any human male or female genitalia, pubic
area, or buttocks with less than fully opaque covering, or the showing of the
human female breasts with less than fully opaque covering of any portion
thereof below the top of the areola, or the depiction of covered male
genitalia in a discernible turgid state. (Ord. 349. 2-21-95)
495
City of Farmington
3-13-3
3-13-4
3-13-3: PROHIBITED ACTS: It shall be unlawful for the holder of any
intoxicating liquor license, nonintoxicating malt liquor license,
or bottle club license or the operator of any of such licensed establishments
within the City to permit or to allow nudity in the licensed premises. (Ord.
095-349, 2-21-95)
3-13-4: VIOLATION: A violation of this Chapter is a misdemeanor,
and is justification for revocation or suspension of any
intoxicating liquor license, nonintoxicating malt liquor license, or bottle club
license. (Ord. 095-349, 2-21-95)
495
City of Farmington
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
SUMMARY OF INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. PLACING
TEMPORARY RESTRICTIONS ON THE SITING OF ADULT
ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN ANY ZONING DISTRICT
OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on
, 1999, Ordinance No.
was adopted by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance
No. , the City Council has directed that a title and summary be prepared for
publication.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the general purpose of the ordinance is to
amend the zoning ordinance establishing limited moratorium on the siting of adult
establishments within any zoning district of the City of Farmington. The moratorium
gives the City the time to study the issue of adult uses and how they would affect
different areas of the City. Research has shown that these types of establishments can
have an adverse effect on different elements of the City.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the title of Ordinance No. , as
approved by the City Council is as follows:
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE PLACING TEMPORARY
RESTRICTIONS ON THE SITING OF ADULT
ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN ANY ZONING DISTRICT
OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON
72473
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the summary of Ordinance No. IS as
follows:
SECTION 1.
Backl:round.
This section gives information on previous studies concerning this subject and how
the City of Farmington stands to related factors concerning this issue. The need for a
moratorium such as this is also shown in this section.
SECTION 2.
Definitions.
This section defines the language that is used in the ordinance.
SECTION 3.
Need for a Moratorium and Study.
This section establishes a moratorium on the development or location of adult
establishments within the City of Farmington pending completion of a planning study and
adoption of appropriate amendment's to the City's zoning ordinance.
SECTION 4.
Enforcement.
This section authorizes ways for the City to enforce this ordinance.
SECTION 5.
Separability.
This section states that all sections in this ordinance are separate and if anyone
section is declared or judged to be invalid, all other sections shall not be invalidated.
SECTION 6.
Duration.
This section establishes the duration of this moratorium at six months from the date
of its effective date or until such earlier time as said ordinance shall be revoked or
otherwise amended.
SECTION 7.
Effective Date.
This section sets the effective date as immediately upon its passage.
A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person
during the City's regular office hours and at the City Hall during regularly scheduled City
Council meetings.
72473
-2-
APPROVED for publication by the City Council of the City of Farmington this
day of , 1999.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Gerald Ristow, Mayor
ATTEST:
Approved as to form the
day of
, 1999.
City Attorney
Published in the Farmington Independent the
day of
,1999.
72473
-3-
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE PLACING TEMPORARY
RESTRICTIONS ON THE SITING OF ADULT
ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN ANY ZONING DISTRICT
OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.Backeround.
1.01. The State Attorney General has prepared a report entitled "report of
the Attorney General's Working Group on Regulation of Sexually Oriented Businesses,"
dated June 6, 1989, prepared by Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General of the State
of Minnesota/Olmstead County Planning Department "Adult Entertainment Report" dated
March 2, 1988, and "A 40-Acre Study" prepared by the St. Paul Division of Planning in
1987, all of which reports are hereafter collectively referred to as "Reports". The Reports
considered evidence from studies conducted in Minneapolis and St. Paul and in other
cities throughout the country relating to sexually oriented businesses.
1.02. The Attorney General's Report, based upon the above referenced
studies and the testimony presented to it has concluded "that sexually oriented businesses
are associated with high crime rates and depression of property values." In addition, the
Attorney General's Working Group: "...heard testimony that the character of a
neighborhood can dramatically change when there is a concentration of sexually oriented
businesses adjacent to residential property." The report concludes that:
a) adult uses have an impact on the neighborhoods surrounding them
which is distinct from the impact caused by other commercial uses;
b) residential neighborhoods located within close proximity to adult
theaters, bookstores, and other adult uses experience increased crime
rates (sex-related crimes in particular), lowered property values,
increased transiency, and decreased stability of ownership;
c) the adverse impacts which adult uses have on surrounding areas
diminish as the distance from the adult uses increases;
d) studies of other cities have shown that among the crimes which tend
to increase either within or in the near vicinity of adult uses are
rapes, prostitution, child molestation, indecent exposure, and other
lewd and lascivious behavior;
72191
e) the City of Phoenix, Arizona study confirmed that the sex crime rate
was on the average 500 percent higher in areas with sexually
oriented businesses;
t) many members of the public perceive areas within which adult uses
are located as less safe than other areas which do not have such uses;
g) studies of other cities have shown that the values of both commercial
and residential properties either are diminished or fail to appreciate
at the rate of other comparable properties when located in proximity
to adult uses; and
h) the Indianapolis, Indiana study established that professional real
estate appraisers believe that an adult bookstore would have a
negative effect on the value of both residential and commercial
properties within a one to three block area of the store.
1.03. The Farmington City Council finds that characteristics of
Farmington are similar to those of the cities cited by the Reports when considering the
affects of adult uses.
1.04. The Farmington City Council fmds, based upon the Reports and the
studies cited therein, that adult uses will have secondary effects upon certain preexisting
land uses within the City.
1.05. The City I s zoning ordinance does not adequately address such adult
uses which have been found by other municipalities to cause similar adverse secondary
effects.
1.06. The Farmington City Council is concerned that the City's zoning
ordinance may be inadequate in its scope and in its restrictions to accomplish the purpose
for which it was intended.
1.07. In addition to the proper zoning classification of such uses, there are
a number of significant planning and land use issues pertaining to the regulation of such
uses, including the following:
a) The particular zoning districts in which such uses should be allowed
as either permitted or conditional uses.
b) The concentration and density of such uses in the City and its
neighborhoods.
c) The effect of such uses on other uses in the surrounding area.
1.08. There is a need for a study to be conducted so that the City can
adopt a set of comprehensive plans and land use zoning regulations pertaining to adult
establishment uses. Such a study will address the land use and zoning issues, including
those referenced above.
72191
2
1.09. There is a need for an interim ordinance to be adopted for the
purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety, and welfare of the
citizens of the City and to ensure that the City and its citizens retain the benefits of the
City's comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance until such a study has been completed.
There is a need to restrict such uses until such a study has been completed and any
modifications to the City's zoning and land use regulations are accomplished.
1.10. The City Council has directed that such a study be undertaken.
1.11. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Subdivision 4 permits the
adoption of interim zoning ordinances during the planning process.
SECTION 2.Defmitions.
2.01. Adult Establishments. An adult establishment is any establishment in
which an adult use compromises more than ten percent (10%) of the floor area of the
establishment in which it is located or which compromises more than twenty percent
(20 %) of the gross receipts of the entire business operation.
2.02. Adult Use. An adult use is any of the activities and businesses
described below:
a) Adult Use - Body Painting Studio: An establishment or business
which provides the service of applying paints or other substance,
whether transparent or non-transparent, the body of a patron when
such body is wholly or partially nude in terms of "specified
anatomical areas."
b) Adult Use - Bookstore: A building or portion of a building used for
the barter, rental, or sale of items consisting of printed matter,
pictures, slides, records, audio tapes, videotape, or motion picture
film if such building or portion of a building is not open to the public
generally, but only to one or more classes of the public, excluding
any minor by reason of age, and if a substantial or significant portion
of such items are distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on
the presentation, display, depiction, or description of "specified
sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas. "
c) Adult Use - Cabaret: A building or portion of a building used for
providing dancing or other live entertainment, if such building or
portion of a building excludes minors by virtue of age, and if such
dancing or other live entertainment is distinguished and characterized
by an emphasis on the presentation, display, depiction, or
description of "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical
areas. "
d) Adult Use - Companionship Establishment: A companionship
72191
3
establishment which excludes minors by reason of age, and which
provides the service of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk,
or discussion between an employee of the establishment and a
customer, if such service is distinguished and characterized by an
emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical
areas. "
e) Adult Use - Conversation/Rap Parlor: A conversation/rap parlor
which excludes minors by reason of age, and which provides the
services of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk, or
discussion, if such services are distinguished and characterized by an
emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical
areas. "
t) Adult Use - Health/Sport Club: A health/sport club which excludes
minors by reason of age, if such club is distinguished and
characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or
"specified anatomical areas. "
g) Adult Use - Hotel or Motel: Adult hotel or motel means a hotel or
motel from which minors are specifically excluded from patronage
and where material is presented which is distinguished and
characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing, or
relating to "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical
areas. "
h) Adult Use - Massage Parlor, Health Club: A massage parlor or
health club which restricts minors by reason of age, and which
provides the services of massage, if such service is distinguished and
characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or
"specified anatomical areas. "
i) Adult Use - Mini Motion Picture Theater: A building or portion of a
building with a capacity for less than fifty (50) persons used for
presenting material if such material is distinguished and
characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing, or
relating to "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical
areas. "
j) Adult Use - Modeling Studio: An establishment whose major
business is the provision, to customers, of figure models who are so
provided with the intent of providing the sexual stimulation or sexual
gratification to such customers and who engage in "specified sexual
activities" or display "specified anatomical areas" while being
observed, painted, painted upon, sketched, drawn, sculptured,
photographed, or otherwise depicted by such customers.
k) Adult Use - Motion Picture Arcade: Any place to which the public is
72191
4
2.03.
2.04.
72191
permitted or invited wherein coin or slug-operated or electronically,
electrically, or mechanically controlled or operated still or motion
picture machines, projectors, or other image-producing devices are
maintained to show images to five (5) or fewer persons per machine
at anyone time, and where the images so displayed are distinguished
and characterized by an emphasis on depicting or describing
"specified sexual activities" or specified anatomical areas."
1)
Adult Use - Motion Picture Theater: A building or portion of a
building with a capacity of fifty (50) or more persons used for
presenting material if such building or portion of a building as a
prevailing practice excludes minors by reason of age or if such
material is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on
"specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas" for
observation by patrons therein.
m)
Adult Use - Novelty Business: A business which has as a principal
activity the sale of devised which stimulate human genitals or
devices which are designed for sexual stimulation.
n)
Adult Use - Sauna: A sauna which excludes minors by reason of
age, and which provides a steam bath or heat bathing room used for
the purpose of pleasure, bathing, relaxation, or reducing, utilizing
steam or hot air as a cleaning, relaxing, or reducing agent if such
building or portion of a building restricts minors by reason of age
and if the service provided by the steam room/bathhouse facility is
distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual
activities" or "specified anatomical areas. "
0)
Adult Use - Steam Room/Bathhouse Facility: A building or portion
of a building used for providing a steam bath or heat bathing room
used for the purpose of pleasure, bathing, relaxation, or reducing,
utilizing steam or hot air as a cleaning, relaxing, or reducing agent if
such building or portion of a building restricts minors by reason of
age and if the service provided by the steam room/bathhouse is
distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual
activities" or "specified anatomical areas. "
a)
Svecified Anatomical Area.
Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic
region, buttock, anus, or female breast(s) below a point immediately
above the top of the areola; and
Human male genitals in a discemable turgid state, even if completely
and opaquely covered.
b)
Svecified Sexual Activities.
5
a) Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, oral copulation, anal
intercourse, oral-anal copulation, bestiality, direct physical
stimulation or unclothed genitals, flagellation or torture in the
context of a sexual relationship, or the use of excretory functions in
the context of a sexual relationship, and any of the following
sexually oriented acts or conduct: anilingus, buggery, coprophagy,
coprophilia, cunnilingus, fellation, necrophilia, pederasty,
pedophilia, piquerism, sapphism, zooerasty; or
b) Clearly depicted human genitals in the state of sexual stimulation,
arousal, or tumescence; or
c) Use of human or animal ejaculation, sodomy, oral copulation,
coitus, or masturbation; or
d) Fondling or touching of nude human genitals, pubic regIOn,
buttocks, or female breast(s); or
e) Situations involving a person or persons, any of whom are nude,
clad in undergarments or in sexually revealing costumes, and who
are engaged in activities involving the flagellation, torture, fettering,
binding, or other physical restraint of any such persons; or
t) Erotic or lewd touching, fondling, or other sexually oriented contact
with an animal by a human being; or
g) Human excretion, urination, masturbation, vaginal or anal irrigation.
SECTION 3.Need for a Moratorium and Study.
3.01. Upon completion of a study to be prepared by City staff and
planning consultants, the matter is to be considered by the Planning Commission for its
review and recommendation to the City Council.
3.02. A moratorium on the development or location of adult establishments
is adopted pending completion of a planning study and the adoption of appropriate
amendments to the City's zoning ordinance. During the term of this ordinance, no adult
establishment shall be located within the City of Farmington.
SECTION 4.Enforcement.
The City may enforce any provision of this ordinance by mandamus, injunction, or
any other appropriate civil remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction.
SECTION 5. Separability .
Every section, provision, or part of this ordinance IS declared separable from
72191
6
every section, provision, or part of this ordinance. If any section, provision, or part of
this ordinance is adjudged to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
judgment shall not invalidate any other section, provision, or part of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.Duration.
This ordinance shall remain in effect for six months from the date of its effective
date or until such earlier time as said ordinance shall be revoked or otherwise amended.
72191
7
SECTION 7.Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
its passage.
ADOPTED this
of Farmington.
day of
, 1999, by the City Council of the City
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Gerald Ristow, Mayor
ATTEST:
72191
8
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/3~
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
City Administrator ~
FROM: David L. Olson
Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Code Enforcement Issues - Councilmember Verch
DATE: May 3,1999
INTRODUCTION
Councilmember Verch mentioned several potential code violations that involved junk and
parked cars, storage of fish houses and the status of completion of improvements to a
residential garage. The following is a summary of each of these concerns.
DISCUSSION
Junk Cars
The Police Department responded on two separate occasions to complaints regarding un-
licensed vehicles or vehicles parked on Upper 182nd Street for an extended period (72
hours or more). In each case there was no ordinance violation observed.
Storage of Fish Houses
The City has received this type of complaint in the past however the Code of Ordinances
does not currently regulate or restrict the storage of fish houses. The City Attorney has
recommended that if this is a concern, Council can instruct staff to prepare a specific
ordinance amendment to regulate the storage of fish houses as several cities have chosen
to do.
Status of Residential Improvements
A building permit was issued in December of 1997 for an addition to a garage located at
5311 Upper 182nd Street West. Several inspections have been done on this project,
however it has not received final approval. Building Inspection staff will be contacting
the property owner to verify the status of the project and schedule any necessary
inspections to determine if the work completed to date is in compliance with all Building
Code requirements.
BUDGET IMP ACT
None
ACTION REQUESTED
For information only. However if Council wishes staff to prepare an ordinance regulating
the storage offish houses, it should instruct staff to do so.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
David L. Olson
Community Development Director
City of Farmington
.325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/3b
TO:
Mayor and Council Members,
City Administrator~DY,
Michael Schultz
Associate Planner
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Public Parking Restrictions
DATE:
May 3, 1999
INTRODUCTION
This memo is in response to City Council inquiry concerning parking restrictions within public
parking areas.
DISCUSSION
Attached is a map and inventory of the public parking areas within the core business district that
identifies unrestricted (green), restricted (yellow) and no parking (red) areas.
The unrestricted parking areas have no identifiable parking restrictions and over night parking
generally is permitted. The unrestricted off-street parking areas include the Oak Street parking lot
located betWeen City Hall and 3rd Street and the Library parking lot. Unrestricted on-street parking
areas include 4th Street and portions of Spruce Street.
The restricted parking areas have identifiable signage indicating the specific parking restrictions.
Most of the downtown area has a general no parking from 2 A.M. to 5 A.M. restriction. This includes
the core downtown streets of Oak, 2nd and 3rd Streets. The restriction is in place for street maintenance
and to restrict vehicles being parked over night and for extended period of time. There are also stalls
signed for more specific restrictions such as 10 or 15 minute parking. Those areas are found in front
ofthe Farmington Bakery and the Farmington Liquor store.
No parking areas also have identifiable signage restricting any parking, these areas are found along
Elm Street and portions of Oak, Spruce and 2nd Streets. This restriction is generally placed along
heavier traveled roads and/or narrower streets.
ACTION REQUESTED
No action is required, this is for Council information only.
Public Parking Inventory
Downtown Area
4/22/99
Street Parkin~
. 2nd Street
(Elm St. to Oak St.)
~ 10 painted parallel stalls on west side adjacent to 2nd Street Parking Lot.
~ No Parking on east side.
(Oak St. to Spruce St.)
~ Approx. 3 parallel stalls on east side and I parallel stall near grain elevator.
~ Restricted parking from 2 AM to SAM on both sides.
Total- 14 parallel parking stalls
Restricted parking? Yes- 2 AM to 5 AM along all of 2nd Street unless identified as No
Parking
. 3rd Street
(Main St. to Elm St.)
~ Approx. 18 parallel stalls
(Elm St. to Oak St.)
~ 43 painted diagonal parking stalls- Restricted parking from 2 AM to S AM
~ 2 - 10 minute stalls - Restricted from 9 AM to 9 PM - Mon. through Saturday
(Oak St. to Spruce St.)
~ 38 painted diagonal parking stalls
~ 1 - 30 minute stall in front of Duebers
(Spruce St. to Walnut St.)
~ Approx. 23 parallel stalls
Total- 122 stalls, 1- 30 minute stall, 2- 10 minute stalls
Restricted parking? Yes- from 2 AM to 5 AM
. 4th Street
(Elm St. to Oak St.)
~ Approx. 20 parallel stalls
(Oak St. to Spruce St.)
~ Approx. 20 parallel stalls
Total- 40 parallel parking stalls
Restricted parking? No
. Oak Street
(2nd St. to 3rd St.)
~ 17 diagonal stalls
~ 5- 15 minute stalls (8 AM to 7 PM) (stalls are located in front of NAPA Auto Parts, The
Farmington Bakery and the new Post Office)
(3rd St. to 4th St.)
~ 31 diagonal stalls
Total- 48 diagonal stalls, 5- 15 minute stalls (8 AM to 7 PM)
Restricted parking? Yes- 2 AM to 5 AM
. Spruce Street
(2nd St. to 3rd St.)
~ Approx. 6 parallel stalls on south side
~ No parking on north side adjacent to HRA property
(3rd St. to 4th St.)
~ Approx. 21 diagonal stalls
~ 1 Handicap stall (adjacent to Senior Center)
~ 1-10 minute stall (adjacent to Senior Center)
Total- Approx. 27 parallel stalls, 1 Handicap stall and 1-10 minute stall
Parkin!! Lots
. 2nd Street Parking Lot
~ 41 Diagonal stalls
~ 2 Handicap stalls
~ Restricted Parking? Yes- 2 AM to 5 AM
. Oak Street Parking Lot
~ 28- 90 degree stalls
~ 2 Handicap stalls
~ 4- 10 minute stalls behind City Liquor store and Subway (8 AM to 10 PM - Mon.
through Saturday)
~ Restricted Parking? No
. City Hall Parking Lot
~ 2 parallel stalls
~ 2 Police Car Only stalls
~ 5 City Vehicle stalls
~ 5 City Vehicle stalls (limited from 4:30 PM to 8 AM)
~ 2 Visitor stalls (unlimited)
~ 2 Visitor stalls (15 min.)
~ 1 Handicap stall
~ Restricted Parking? Yes (see above)
. Library Parking Lot
~ 44- 90 degree stalls
~ 4 Handicap stalls
~ 1 stall used for Senior Center Bus
~ Restricted Parking? No
-
1M,.". ~ '...,,',)t..
-. ",.'..,.. ...~'
.,t. . .' "> , ,,' j
I . " ';':-'.r
.,'p ;..~
tn
ns
(1)
...
<(
C)~
c:
-
~
...
ns
a..
(J
.-
-
.c
::::J
a..
z.~
~
en
c
o
ts
'C
.....
en
Q)
0::
C>
c
32
L..
ro
c..
C>
c
32
L..
ro
c..
o
Z
en
c
o
ts
'C
.....
en
Q)
0::
C>
c
32
L..
ro
c..
o
Z