HomeMy WebLinkAbout08.26.13 Work Session Packet City of Farmington Mission Statement
430 Third Street Through teamwork and cooperation?
Farmington,MN 55024 the City of Farmington provides quality
services that preserve our proud past and
foster a promising future.
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
August 26,2013
6:30 p.m.
Conference Room 170
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVE AGENDA
3. 2014 BUDGET DISCUSSION
4. CITY ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE
5. ADJOURN
PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
Council workshops are conducted as an Informal work session.All discussions shall be considered fact fnding,hypothetical and uno/?clal
critical thinking exercises,which do not reflect an official public position.
Council work session outcomes should not be construed by the attending public and/or reporting media as the articulation ofaformal COpoUcy
position. Only official Council action normally taken at a regularly scheduled Council meeting should be considered as aformal expression of
the City's position on any given matter.
41m#4, City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington,Minnesota
. 651.280.6800•Fax 651.280.6899
A
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
DATE: August 26, 2013
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: David J. McKnight, City Administrator
SUBJECT: 2014 Draft Budget Update
Some of the information that we have been waiting for from the Department of Revenue
on levy limits and from Dakota County on fiscal disparities has been received. As you
recall we temporarily stopped work on the 2014 budget until we had all of the
information we needed to make recommendations to you for consideration.
The last version of the 2014 budget that you reviewed included a 4.50%tax levy
increase, included the first year of the CIP funded directly from the tax levy and
dedicated all of the new local government aid (LGA) dollars to one-time type purchases.
Since that time staff made you aware that due to the city receiving LGA for the first time
in 2014, our operating levy limit for next year would be 0% excluding our debt
payments. With that in mind the City Council has directed staff to move forward on a
plan to fund the CIP through bonding. The current state of the draft budget, taking levy
limits into account, will require us to reduce the original draft budget by$184,233.
2014 Draft Budget-Version#2
Version#2 of the draft 2014 budget, summary pages attached, now reaches the
maximum tax levy limit allowed by state law. The current draft budget stands at
$10,952,469 which is a 3.63% increase over 2013. The current draft tax levy stands at
$8,730,856, which is a 1.92%, or$164,874, increase over 2013.
Actual Levy Limit
The City has still not received notification from the Department of Revenue on our 2014
tax levy limit. The Legislature enacted limits for one year that will cover levies
established by cities and counties for tax collection in 2014. The 2014 tax levy limit is a
3% increase over the greater of the 2012 or 2013 non-debt property tax levy.
Farmington is also scheduled to receive local government aid for the first time in ten
years which has a direct impact on our levy limit for next year as well. The 2014
property tax levy limit is as follows:
2012 2013
Total Levy $10,582,243 $10,761,856
Less Special Levies (Debt) $2,589,414 $2,720,801
Net Levy Subject to Levy Limit $7,983,829 $8,041,055
Farmington will use 2013 as the base since it is greater than 2012.
Levy Limit Base (2013) $8,041,055
X 1.03% 1.03
Total $8,282,286
Less 2014 LGA $ 245,329
Potential 2014 Base $8,036,957
Since no city's base for 2014 can be lower than the base in either 2012 or 2013,
Farmington will use the 2013 base of$8,041,055 in determining our 2014 tax levy limit.
This is a difference of$4,098.
With the levy limit now determined it means the original draft budget needs to be
reduced by$184233.
Please let me clarify that any reference to budget reductions can mean either a cut in
expenses or an adjustment to revenues.
Proposed Changes to 2014 Version#2
I am proposing the following changes to version#2 to get the budget within the state
imposed levy limits. All of the changes have been applied to the draft budget
documents that are attached to this memo for your review.
1. Increase the annual contribution from the Cable Franchise Fees from
$75,000 per year to$100,000 per year. ($25,000)
This fund had a balance of$433,000 at the end of 2012. With the scheduled
expenditure of significant dollars in 2014 on equipment upgrades in the City
Council Chambers and Control Room I am estimating that this fund will have
around$300,000 at the end of 2014. This fund can afford an increase in the
annual contribution to the General Fund
2. Increase the estimated savings to the City from the new law eliminating
sales tax for cities effect in 2014. ($10,000)
Staff was taking an extremely conservative approach to this issue in estimating
the amount of dollars we would save due to the elimination of sales tax
payments. At this point I am proposing to increase the expected savings by
$10,000.
2
3. Move the proposed lighting project at Fire Station#1 to LGA Funding.
($9,000)
Fire Station#1 has a lighting project proposed for 2014. I am proposing to move
this project to an LGA funded project therefore removing$9,000 from the tax
levy.
4. Increase the estimated amount of revenue from the three townships for
2014. ($14,000)
The revenue that we have received from the townships for fire service has been
fluxuating that past three to four years. Two of the townships (Castle Rock and
Eureka) have contracts that spell out specific dollar amounts for the service they
receive. Empire Township's annual contribution is still based off of the old,
complicated formula that was developed in the 1970's. j
For 2014 Eureka Township will contribute $30,716 for this service. Castle Rock
Township's contract expires at the end of this year with a scheduled payment of
$52,906. Empire Township paid$80,053 for their services in 2012 based on the
actual service they received. 1 am proposing that we increase the expected
revenue from the three townships to$164,000 for 2014 which represents a
$14,000 increase over the current version of the budget.
I am aware that some of you would like to start to dedicate some of these dollars
towards future FFD equipment purchases. This issue is reflected in the FFD CIP
that is discussed later in this memo.
5. Increase the amount of revenue anticipated from investments. ($5,000)
While the proposal to increase the amount of revenue expected from investments
into the General Fund helps us reach our immediate goal of cutting the budget,
the amount that would be expected to be earned in 2014 ($55,000) would still be
lower than the budgeted amount for 2013 ($60,000). As you are aware, we have
been on a path to remove interest income from the General Fund for a number of
years. The reason for this is that the General Fund does not maintain a positive
cash balance throughout the year and therefore should not be earning any
interest if they have no money to invest. The General Fund is actually earning
interest at the expense of other funds. We will continue on a path to remove this
revenue from the budget but at a slower pace.
6. Eliminate One Police Officer Position. ($97,000)
I am proposing that we reduce our police patrol staff by one position to help meet
the levy limit goal. While reducing our patrol staff is difficult for me to propose for
many reasons, an analysis of our proposed budget makes this issue more clear.
3
Our proposed budget for next year totals$10,952,469 after the position is
removed. The budget is broken down as follows:
Personnel 66.64% ($7,298,877)
Supplies 6.51% ($713,290)
Other Services 20.45% ($2,239,723)
Capital Outlay 2.10% ($230,000)
Transfers 4.30% ($470,579)
When the personnel numbers are broken down by department, the Police
Department makes up 45.45% of all personnel costs in the draft 2014 budget.
Position reductions are not new to the City of Farmington budget process. Since
2006 the City has eliminated/not replaced the following positions in the General
Fund:
Community Development Director Comm. Dev. Administrative Assistant
Building Inspector Assistant City Engineer
Economic Development Specialist Park Maintenance Specialist
Building Inspector(PT) HR Representative
Recreation Specialist Administrative Services Director
Accountant Community Service Officer(PT)
In addition, we have reduced three positions FTE by a total of 1.2 FTE's.
1 share this information in this memo because/truly believe that with the
amount of dollars we need to remove from the budget, the council's
direction to not use any LGA dollars on operational expenses and my belief
that other departments have already been depleted of staff over the years;
the recommendation to reduce our police force by one officer is necessary.
7. Reduce the transfer to the Economic Development Authority. ($10,000)
A number of years ago the City Council included an annual$50,000 transfer to
the EDA from the General Fund to help get this fund to a positive balance. Over
the years this fund has improved from being over$100,000 negative to today
where the fund balance stands at almost$100,000.
The 2013 budget includes an expenditure of$33,500 for the repayment of an old
loan that we were able to pay off at the end of 2012. This expenditure will not
occur in 2013. In addition, staff made the decision to apply almost$16,000 in
excess TIF revenue into this fund. With all of this in mind and the fact that we
need to reduce the budget, I am confident the EDA can continue to operate with
a positive cash balance with this change in the transfer.
8. Reduce the Police Department exercise equipment and use LGA dollars to
help purchase squad cars. ($5,000)
4
While I believe the use of budget dollars to upgrade the exercise room at the
Police Department is a good investment in our employee wellness program,
cutting the request for$10,000 in new exercise equipment in half is required due
to the need to reduce the tax levy. I have reduced the expenditure in 2014 by
$5,000 and assigned the LGA dollars that were going to be used to purchase
some of this equipment to our annual purchase of squad cars.
9. Miscellaneous Expenditure Reductions ($8,331)
Miscellaneous reductions in expenditures were made in a number of budgets to
help reach the levy limit goal.
Real Estate and Personal Property Values
The following is a summary of the preliminary payable 2014 assessor's market values
and tax capacity values by property class.
Assessors Market Values
Increase/(Decrease) Due To:
USG Class Pay 2014 Total Market New
Conditions Construction
A-Residential 1,127,005,644 51,733,723 38,208,323 13,525,400
B-Commercial 80,746,100 728,500 404,700 323,800
C-Industrial 19,638,800 (539,300) (539,300) 0
D-Utility 21,297,100 1,119,000 1,119,000 0
F-Agriculture 28,685,405 4,823,996 4,534,896 289,100
F5-Rural 2,998,900 44,400 44,400 0
Vacant
J-Apartments 25,633,500 586,600 578,600 8,000
K-Railroads 1,258,400 41,300 41,300 0
P-Personal 16,285,800 0 0 0
Property
TOTALS 1,323,549,649 57,434,119 43,287,819 14,146,300
% Increase 4.53% 3.42% 1.12%
Tax Capacity Values
Increase/(Decrease) Due To:
USG Class Pay 2014 Total Market New
Conditions Construction
A-Residential 11,317,553 511,715 353,124 158,591
B-Commercial 1,518,969 13,202 6,879 6,323
5
C-Industrial 379,921 (10,786) (10,786) 0
D-Utility 425,192 0 0 0
F-Agriculture 235,913 38,439 35,548 2,891
F5-Rural 23,257 484 484 0
Vacant
J-Apartments 279,579 9,185 9.085 100
K-Railroads 25,168 826 826 0
P-Personal 32,0680 0 0 0
Property
TOTALS 14,526,232 563,065 395,160 167,905
% Increase 4.03% 2.83% 1.20%
I share this information at this time to show you that residential property values are back
on the increase as compared to the past 3-4 years. Residential values are not going up
on all homes in Farmington and for those that are going up they are not going up at the
same rate. There are some pockets where the values continue to decline, but overall
housing values are increasing. This means that residential properties will make up a
larger portion of the tax capacity pie for taxes payable in 2014.
Individual Property Impacts
In the past we have tried to show you an estimated impact of the proposed tax levy on
specific properties in Farmington. The estimates below are for 8 different homestead
residential properties in different parts of Farmington and are based on version#2 of the
2014 budget presented with this memo.
A B C D E F G H Average
2013 $186,101 $190,025 $198,200 $86,528 $255,970 $181,414 $127,350 $141,084 $153,511
Tax.Val
2014 $168,879 $171,713 $216,076 $68,163 $265,017 $191,551 $131,710 $128,222 $157,735
Tax.Val
2013 $1,243.45 $1,269.50 $1,324.29 $444.33 $1,710.49 $1,212.04 $851.24 $942.77 $1,025.63
City Tax
2014 $1,108.98 $1,127.37 $447.79 $447.79 $1,739.96 $1,258.03 $864.73 $841.75 $1,035.44
City Tax
Change ($134.47) ($142.14) $94.60 $3.47 $29.47 $45.98 $13.49 ($101.03) $9.97
Fire Department CIP
At the July 8, 2013 work session,the City Council asked me to work with the Fire
Department Truck Committee on a multi-year capital improvement plan (CIP). The one
exception to this issue was that the need for a ladder truck would be discussed at a later
date between the department and the City Council.
I proposed a CIP to the Truck Committee along with funding sources and they did some
minimal tweaking to my proposed plan that I was in support of. The plan as it exists
today is listed below:
6
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Engine 2 $620,000
Brush 1 $60,000
Brush 2 $60,000
Brush 12 $100,000
Tender 2 $250 000
Chief 1 $45,000
Chief 2 $45,000
Chief 3 $45,000
Chief 4 $45,000
TOTAL $45,000 $145,000 $150,000 $310,000 $0 $0 $620,000
Funding
Reserve$ $45,000
Tax Levy $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $65,000 $65,000 $70,000
LGA $105,000 $75,000 $205,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000
Township$ $10,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
TOTAL $45,000 $165,000 $145,000 $295,000 $245,000 $245 000 $250,000
Fund Bal. $0 $20,000 $15,000 $0 $245,000 $490,000 $120,000
This plan accomplishes a number of goals. It dramatically updates the FFD fleet; it
bridges the gap into the new city road/vehicle CIP and provides a realistic funding plan.
I do have some concerns about using and the amount of CIP that is dedicated to this
plan. One option the City Council may want to consider is replacing some or all of the
LGA dollars dedicated to the FFD CIP with the tax levy dollars that are being used to
pay back the loan to the Water Board for the purchase of Engine 22. The 2013 through
2017 city budgets will include $120,000 per year to be collected from the tax levy to
repay this loan
Summary
This is my recommendation for your consideration for the preliminary budget and tax
levy. I would be happy to explain in more detail my recommendations and answer any
questions you may have. It is important to remember that this budget does not address
the issue of the General Fund balance which is something that I will be stressing with
the 2015 budget and beyond.
If you have any questions please let me know. Thank you for your time on this
important matter.
7
W
� V o
C W 0 N
N v a m
E a `r'
z
L
tt$ I-
D. zz. o
Q) z z "'
0
® a
SI v o
00
C z
O w a
to - og <
E 13
I- N
f6 w a)
LL. Q a;
N- X ® W t
O LU e-9 (r) a
z v
"a VI Q
4-* cc k r�ax
LL
N ,., ..:
O o
N z
in 2
W
u W es
z -1
w
r W
J
Q c-I
d 1
U
z
D
(I) )-
w <
U —J
D V)
LU 0 cc
Z (iv) LU LU
, ui V) __J LL
.— c[ < V)
Lu 1— Z
(g2 CT_ I E.: a
Lu D I- < cic
Q.. (1) 0 U I-
• a a a ._
>.
S..
.„,
0
b.0
a)
'-.-, ,•., ---•,••,•,, ----,.-----
4-+ ,
ra
(..)
-0
4.■0
CD 01
b.0 CD
-0 cr
= ^
CO r‘iLf) '1.
-0 al .: ...
,
c 6' C,
(_fl , ...
--..,
.....
. .
CO , '1
s. o
. .
a) ,
,-..,
c
a)
L9
, •
.:r. .
,-1
. ,
0
(NI . • '. 0
o
N
• , ,,,--
. -
____
v)
w
z o o
D 0 eri
2 8i2.,
cC
O E Q
v)
0
F-7-
< 4,
LI Fn
-2 -c5 0
i— 2 '-‘,2.•. ',-, 1-- .zg
UJ
oo
.... 0 U ., ...., . -.
.7
.
t 3
'
0
< 0
H m
rri Ul e—I
Z 4
44.
— 0 1
-
,-
og '-., ;;,..L.■(_. .
ri t- . ..
CI 0
f•I 00
U
cr) -
2 2-0
r1
v..,
1_ (.9 ..?..c•4
1— 0 ID Tzt 1–
(1D cc cLp c:i tn
1.3_1
Z ul cl- o•
Z ra
u ci
,-1
CC
(....) 0 L-
0
n
P tn
LL < z
P z
u
LI, 2 ;.,,,,,=, ;
c).. .9 w
w r-- w
I-- e , -- 0,-, D Cg
(f) (fli Lu 0 1-1
•■• 0 Lu k■l" Z Z
_ Cr) (D — IN". U ,....0
(.9 CA c•—• 1.1.1 .64''•
Z 1.1.1 c; cc 00
s--I z CI w CC LT Ln
L.,) Z
cc < E z
.__ _.:0-)
a z ,
f -
'
ic
u., „,
1-- 0-- 5 a_
7gT Lrj ul
w
u
cc
cc n
0
LL, cy,
rsi
<
CC
D
I-
<
Z
CITY OF FARMINGTON
2014 BUDGET BREAKDOWN
BUDGET AND TAX LEVY SUMMARY
EXPENDITURES 2013 2014 %CHANGE 2015 %CHANGE
ADMINISTRATION $921,778 $858,478 -6.87% $886,109 3.22%
HR/IT $188,166 $251,726 33.78% $256,092 1.73%
FINANCE $509,597 $562,154 10.31% $591,331 5.19%
POLICE $4,010,417 $4,075,833 1.63% $4,259,180 4.50%
FIRE $805,504 $1,113,265 38.21% $1,214,591 9.10%
ENGINEERING $1,155,832 $1,155,773 -0.01% $1,182,216 2.29%
MUNICIPAL SERVICES $1,262,851 $1,237,446 -2.01% $1,253,706 1.31%
PARKS/RECREATION $1,279,508 $1,227,215 -4.09% $1,230,218 0.24%
TRANSFERS $435,000 $470,579 8.18% $470,000 -0.12%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $10,568,653 $10,952,469 3.63% $11,343,443 3.57%
REVENUES 2013 2014 %CHANGE 2015 %CHANGE
LICENSES/PERMITS $381,550 $412,873 8.21% $392,705 -4.88%
FINES/FORFEITURES $62,800 $70,800 12.74% $70,800 0.00%
INTEREST $60,000 $55,000 -8.33% $45,000 -18.18%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL $407,600 $658,529 61.56% $412,800 -37.31%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES $521,650 $585,100 12.16% $583,850 -0.21%
MISCELLANEOUS $32,500 $35,500 9.23% $32,500 -8.45%
TOTAL REVENUES $1,466,100 $1,817,802 23.99% $1,537,655 -15.41%
TRANSFER REVENUES
FUND REVENUES $1,064,498 $1,086,612 2.08% $1,101,741 1.39%
GENERAL FUND BUDGET $10,568,653 $10,952,469 3.63% $11,343,443 3.57%
GENERAL FUND REVENUES - $1,466,100 - $1,817,802 23.99% $1,537,655 -15.41%
TRANSFERS OUT - $1,064,498 - $1,086,612 2.08% $1,101,741 1.39%
FISCAL DISPARITIES - $2,195,874 - $2,253,199 2.61% $2,253,199 0.00%
SUB TOTAL $5,842,181 $5,794,856 -0.81% $6,450,848 11.32%
DEBT + $2,720,801 + $2,943,000 8.17% + $2,990,450 1.61%
AG CREDIT + $3,000 + $3,000 0.00% + $3,000 0.00%
SALES TAX ELIM PLACEHOLDER $0 -$30,000 #DIV/01 -$30,000 0.00%
ICE ARENA LEVY + 12 + S20.000 #DIV/0I + $20,000 0.00%
NET TAX LEVY $8,565,982 $8,730,856 $9,434,298
1.92% 8.06%
$164,874 $703,442
LEVY/FD CAP CURRENT OVER
$10,984,055 $10,984,055 $0
8/21/2013
CITY OF FARMINGTON
2014 BUDGET BREAKDOWN
EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
ADMINISTRATION 2013 2014 2015
LEGISLATIVE CONTROL $78,279 $73,574 -6.01% $76,249 3.64%
HISTORICAL PRESERVATION $7,500 $7,500 0.00% $7,500 0.00%
ADMINISTRATION $514,815 $461,110 -10.43% $465,837 1.03%
ELECTIONS $22,050 $23,837 8.10% $37,118 55.72%
COMMUNICATIONS $84,522 $85,923 1.66% $86,375 0.53%
CITY HALL $204,136 $206,534 1.17% $213,030 3.15%
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $10,476 $0 -100.00% $0 #DIV/0!
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $921,778 $858,478 -6.87% $886,109 3.22%
HUMAN RESOURCES/IT 2013 2014 2015
HUMAN RESOURCES $188,166 $251,726 33.78% $256,092 1.73%
TOTAL HR/IT $188,166 $251,726 33.78% $256,092 1.73%
FINANCE 2013 2014 2015
ACCOUNTING $375,597 $406,654 8.27% $429,331 5.58%
RISK MANAGEMENT $134,000 $155,500 16.04% $162,000 4.18%
TOTAL FINANCE $509,597 $562,154 10.31% $591,331 5.19%
POLICE 2013 2014 2015
ADMINISTRATION $790,695 $779,548 -1.41% $783,320 0.48%
PATROL $2,506,709 $2,523,270 0.66% $2,680,597 6.24%
INVESTIGATIONS $707,613 $766,865 8.37% $788,413 2.81%
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT $5,400 $6,150 13.89% $6,850 11.38%
TOTAL POLICE $4,010,417 $4,075,833 1.63% $4,259,180 4.50%
FIRE 2013 2014 2015
FIRE $756,303 $1,063,542 40.62% $1,158,380 8.92%
RESCUE $49,201 $49,723 1.06% $56,211 13.05%
TOTAL FIRE $805,504 $1,113,265 38.21% $1,214,591 9.10%
ENGINEERING 2013 2014 2015
ENGINEERING $542,185 $539,884 -0.42% $552,169 2.28%
PLANNING $259,217 $252,209 -2.70% $259,470 2.88%
BUILDING INSPECTIONS $246,963 $258,320 4.60% $262,656 1.68%
NATURAL RESOURCES $107,467 $105,360 -1.96% $107,921 2.43%
TOTAL ENGINEERING $1,155,832 $1,155,773 -0.01% $1,182,216 2.29%
MUNICIPAL SERVICES 2013 2014 2015
STREETS $1,071,489 $1,042,795 -2.68% $1,073,648 2.96%
SNOW REMOVAL $191,362 $194,651 1.72% $180,058 -7.50%
TOTAL MUNICIPAL SERVICES $1,262,851 $1,237,446 -2.01% $1,253,706 1.31%
PARKS AND RECREATION 2013 2014 2015
PARK MAINTENANCE $611,650 $564,036 -7.78% $556,630 -1.31%
RAMBLING RIVER CENTER $146,602 $153,287 4.56% $153,998 0.46%
ADMINISTRATION $261,637 $257,873 -1.44% $257,418 -0.18%
RECREATION PROGRAMS $118,110 $112,851 -4.45% $119,197 5.62%
POOL $141,509 $139,168 -1.65% $142,975 2.74%
TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION $1,279,508 $1,227,215 -4.09% $1,230,218 0.24%
TOTAL EXEPENDITURES $10,133,653 $10,481,890 3.44% $10,873,443 3.74%
TRANSFERS 2013 2014 2015
SEAL COATING $350,000 $350,000 0.00% $350,000 0.00%
TRAIL MAINTENANCE $0 $25,000 #DIV/0! $40,000 60.00%
EDA OPERATIONS $50,000 $40,000 -20.00% $45,000 12.50%
BUILDING FUND $15,000 $15,000 0.00% $35,000 133.33%
BUILDING FUND LGA $0 $40,579 #DIV/0! $0 -100.00%
RRC LOAN REPAYMENT $20,000 $0 -100.00% $0 #DIV/0!
TOTAL TRANSFERS $435,000 $470,579 8.18% $470,000 -0.12%
GRAND TOTAL EXPENDITURES $10,568,653 $10,952,469 3.63% $11,343,443 3.57%
ADMINISTRATION $858,478 7.84%
HR/IT $251,726 2.30%
FINANCE $562,154 5.13%
POLICE $4,075,833 37.21%
FIRE $1,113,265 10.16%
ENGINEERING $1,155,773 10.55%
MUNICIPAL SERVICES $1,237,446 11.30%
PARKS $1,227,215 11.20%
TRANSFERS $470,579 4.30%
$10,952,469
CITY OF FARMINGTON
2014 BUDGET BREAKDOWN
REVENUE SUMMARY
REVENUES 2013 2014 2015
LICENSES/PERMITS $381,550 $412,873 8.21% $392,705 -4.88%
FIN ES/FORFEITURES $62,800 $70,800 12.74% $70,800 0.00%
INTEREST $60,000 $55,000 -8.33% $45,000 -18.18%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL $407,600 $658,529 61.56% $412,800 -37.31%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES $521,650 $585,100 12.16% $583,850 -0.21%
MISCELLANEOUS $32,500 $35,500 9.23% $32,500 -8.45%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE $1,466,100 $1,817,802 23.99% $1,537,655 -15.41%
TRANSFERS 2013 2014 2015
LIQOUR OPERATIONS $50,000 $50,016 100.03% $50,016 0.00%
SEWER $70,007 $70,020 100.02% $70,020 0.00%
STORM WATER $70,007 $70,020 100.02% $70,020 0.00%
REFUSE $70,007 $70,020 100.02% $70,020 0.00%
WATER $70,007 $70,020 100.02% $70,020 0.00%
TRANSFERS TWO $734,470 $756,516 103.00% $771,645 2.00%
TOTAL TRANSFERS IN $1,064,498 $1,086,612 2.08% $1,101,741 1.39%
TOTAL REVENUES $2,530,598 $2,904,414 14.77% $2,639,396 -9.12%
CITY OF FARMINGTON
2014 BUDGET BREAKDOWN
REVENUES SUMMARY
APPROVED THROUGH APPROVED THROUGH REQUESTED ESTIMATED
LICENSES/PERMITS 2012 12/2012 2013 7/2013 2014 2015
LIQUOR LICENSES $16,000 $27,317 170.73% $25,000 $24,883 $26,000 $26,000
BEER LICENSES $2,000 $1,800 90.00% $3,000 $2,050 $2,800 $2,800
CLUB LICENSES $900 $300 33.33% $300 $300 $300 $300
ANIMAL LICENSES $9,755 $8,212 84.18% $1,400 $1,259 $8,600 $1,500
ARCADE LICENSES $0 $760 #DIV/0! $600 $655 $655 $655
MASSAGE LICENSES $1,000 $950 95.00% $750 $250 $850 $850
GAMBLING LICENSES/PERMITS $1,000 $400 40.00% $300 $200 $300 $300
OTHER LICENSES $1,500 $2,920 194.67% $3,000 $2,480 $2,500 $2,000
TOTAL LICENSES/PERMITS $32,155 $42,659 132.67% $34,350 $32,077 $42,005 $34,405
APPROVED THROUGH APPROVED THROUGH REQUESTED ESTIMATED
PERMITS 2012 12/2012 2013 7/2013 2014 2015
BUILDING PERMITS $340,000 $313,494 92.20% $293,000 $319,429 $310,000 $300,000
REINSPECTION FEES $300 $545 181.67% $300 $1,075 $400 $400
PLUMBING/HEATING PERMITS $35,000 $28,215 80.61% $31,000 $47,644 $32,568 $32,000
SEWER PERMITS $10,000 $5,250 52.50% $5,000 $5,625 $5,000 $5,000
ELECTRIC PERMITS $0 $13,851 #DIV/0! $0 $7,717 $7,100 $7,100
ISTS PERMIT $0 $490 #DIV/01 $500 $280 $500 $500
COUNTY SEPTIC FEE PERMIT $0 $0 #DIV/0! $0 -$35 $0 $0
UTILITY PERMITS $3,000 $8,240 274.67% $5,500 $4,039 $5,500 $5,500
STREET BREAKING PERMITS $0 $70 #DIV/0! $200 $0 $0 $0
SIGN PERMITS $1,000 $680 68.00% $500 $400 $500 $500
BURNING PERMITS $5,000 $4,590 91.80% $4,200 $3,460 $4,300 $4,300
OTHER PERMITS $5,000 $5,067 101.34% $7,000 $2,987 $5,000 $3,000
TOTAL PERMITS $399,300 $380,492 95.29% $347,200 $392,621 $370,868 $358,300
APPROVED THROUGH APPROVED THROUGH REQUESTED ESTIMATED
FINES AND FORFEITURES 2012 12/2012 2013 7/2013 2014 2015
FINES $70,000 $72,385 103.41% $62,000 $48,637 $70,000 $70,000
CODE VIOLATIONS/FINE $0 $825 #DIV/01 $800 $0 $800 $800
TOTAL FINES/FORFEITURES $70,000 I $73,210 104.59% $62,800 $48,637 $70,800 $70,800
APPROVED THROUGH APPROVED THROUGH REQUESTED ESTIMATED
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2012 12/2012 2013 7/2013 2014 2015
STATE AID-MAINTENANCE $163,140 $193,007 118.31% $163,150 $197,058 $163,150 $163,150
STATE AID-POLICE $154,000 $166,995 108.44% $155,000 $0 $155,000 $155,000
STATE AID-POST TRAINING $9,000 $26,262 291.80% $10,000 $12,789 $14,000 $14,000
STATE AID-FIRE $73,000 $89,419 122.49% $73,000 $0 $75,000 $75,000
OTHER-STATE GRANT $0 $18,188 #DIV/0I $0 $5,960 $0 $0
OTHER-DAKOTA COUNTY $5,250 $14,301 272.40% $5,250 $6,272 $5,250 $5,250
OTHER $1,200 $850 70.83% $1,200 $160 $800 $400
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID(LGA) $0 $0 #DIV/01 $0 $0 $245,329 $245,329
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL $405,590 $509,022 125.50% $407,600 $222,239 $658,529 $412,800
APPROVED THROUGH APPROVED THROUGH REQUESTED ESTIMATED
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2012 12/2012 2013 7/2013 2014 2015
CUSTOMER SERVICE FEES $1,000 $435 43.50% $600 $563 $600 $600
ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEES $3,000 $3,036 101.20% $3,500 $800 $3,000 $3,000
PRE PLAT ADMIN FEES $5,000 $250 5.00% $1,000 $125 $500 $250
FIRE TOWNSHIP FEES $145,000 $160,744 110.86% $130,000 $44,664 $164,000 $164,000
ISD 192 SRO FEES $171,148 $188,802 110.32% $75,000 $83,413 $112,500 $112,500
EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL $12,000 $13,600 113.33% $10,500 $16,200 $10,500 $10,500
GIS FEES $2,000 $0 0.00% $200 $0 $0 $0
PUBLIC WORKS CHARGES $0 $391 #DIV/0! $3,000 $333 $200 $200
RECREATION PROGRAM FEES $103,675 $99,275 95.76% $100,000 $75,060 $100,000 $100,000
POOL ADMISSIONS $39,000 $40,373 103.52% $37,000 $35,848 $38,000 $38,000
SWIM LESSON FEES $18,500 $17,449 94.32% $17,000 $12,160 $17,000 $17,000
POOL CONCESSIONS $11,000 $10,229 92.99% $9,500 $10,264 $10,000 $10,000
RRC PROGRAM FEES $19,000 $16,429 86.47% $13,850 $11,862 $11,000 $11,000
RRC MEMBERSHIP FEES $8,500 $16,667 196.08% $10,500 $12,160 $14,000 $14,000
CITY NEWS ADVERTISING $0 $400 #DIV/0I $0 $250 $0 $0
RECREATION ADVERTISING $2,200 $1,800 81.82% $1,800 $2,240 $1,800 $1,800
SALE OF ASSETTS $1,626 $95,612 5880.20% $33,200 $7,125 $2,000 $1,000
FRANCHISE FEES $75,000 $75,000 100.00% $75,000 $57,507 $100,000 $100,000
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE $617,649 $740,492 119.89% $521,650 $370,574 $585,100 $583,850
APPROVED THROUGH APPROVED THROUGH REQUESTED ESTIMATED
MISCELLANEOUS 2012 12/2012 2013 7/2013 2014 2015
INVESTMENT INCOME $80,000 $74,132 92.67% $60,000 $40,316 $55,000 $45,000
DONATIONS $26,000 $3,252 12.51% $6,500 $1,823 $0 $0
RENTALS $18,500 $34,735 187.76% $0 $0 $0 $0
RRC RENTAL $0 $0 #DIV/0! $8,500 $7,574 $13,000 $13,000
POOL RENTAL $0 $0 #DIV/0! $3,500 $429 $3,000 $3,000
OTHER RENTAL $0 $0 #DIV/0I $7,000 $11,493 $14,000 $14,000
MISCELLANEOUS $34,507 $6,608 19.15% $7,000 $15,911 $5,500 $2,500
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS $159,007 $118,727 74.67% $92,500 $77,546 $90,500 $77,500
APPROVED THROUGH APPROVED THROUGH REQUESTED ESTIMATED
TRANSFERS 2012 12/2012 2013 7/2013 2014 2015
LIQUOR OPERATIONS $70,007 $70,007 100.00% $50,000 $29,167 $50,016 $50,016
SEWER $70,007 $70,007 100.00% $70,007 $40,837 $70,020 $70,020
STORM WATER $70,007 $70,007 100.00% $70,007 $40,837 $70,020 $70,020
REFUSE $70,007 $70,007 100.00% $70,007 $40,837 $70,020 $70,020
WATER $70,007 $70,007 100.00% $70,007 $40,837 $70,020 $70,020
TRANSFERS TWO
SANITARY FUND $0 $0 #DIV/01 $192,439 $112,257 $198,216 $202,180
STORM WATER FUND $0 $0 #DIV/0! $235,299 $137,257 $242,364 $247,211
WATER FUND $0 $0 #DIV/0! $306,732 $178,927 $315,936 $322,254
TOTAL TRANSFERS TWO $0 $0 #DIV/0! $734,470 $428,441 $756,516 $771,645
TOTAL TRANSFERS $350,035 $350,035 100.00% $1,064,498 $620,956 $1,086,612 $1,101,741
TOTAL REVENUES $2,033,736 $2,214,637 108.90% $2,530,598 $1,764,650 $2,904,414 $2,639,396
N
•
cY)
cu O
V
N
oo
›° (1) 14-1 N 1 r-,— .0
N N kn-
V J
(1) (t
)...... (1)
Cos) _I0
C ;- ;
. . . N 'I O
E., sue.-� :,x � , -
U'. r"� U -}-+
.� O
(1) O ,0 ,,, c.,
4�� 0 00
sir, 00
J (1) I --,-- 1 ;. ::' 0\ CDI
• Tm( C o
'
4 1.-.1, .
O W c„
;...1 ,
4.4 , (1) ••—( ›•-1
1 Cu•� C)
C7 w Z •