The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04.19.99 Council Packet COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR April 19, 1999 6:30 P.M. CHAMBER/COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVEAGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) ~ 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (4/5/99) (Regular) b) Adopt Resolution - Accept Grant - Senior Center c) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation from Dakota Electric d) Authorize RFP for Audio Visual Services e) Agreements for Clean Up Day f) School and Conference Request - Fire Department g) Deer Meadows Project Update h) First Quarter Building Permit Report i) Approve Bills 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. AWARDOFCONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Review of Housing Tax Credit Applications b) 1999 LMC Annual Conference Attendance c) Adopt Resolution - Accept MnDOT Grant for Senior Center Van d) Adopt Resolution - Preliminary and Final Plat - Oak Place Townhomes e) Adopt Resolution - Oak Place Townhomes Development Contract (Supplemental) f) Adopt Resolution - Preliminary and Final Plat - East Farmington 6th Addition g) Adopt Resolution - East Farmington 6th Addition Development Contract h) Adopt Resolution - Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Adopt Ordinance Rezoning County Road 72 Properties 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Adopt Resolution - County Road 72 Project b) Adopt Resolution - Prairie Creek Storm Sewer Upgrade Project Action Taken 15. ADJOURN 12. NEW BUSINESS a) Review of Chapter 1306 Uniform Building Code 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION -Administrator Review 7~ COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR April 5, 1999 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Ristow led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Ristow, Cordes, Soderberg, Strachan Verch City Administrator Erar, Attorney Joel Jamnik, City Management Team 4. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by Strachan, second by Cordes to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS a) Open Board of Equalization Meeting The Board of Equalization Meeting was opened by Mr. Bill Peterson, County Assessor. Seven property owners attended. Four properties will be reviewed. MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg to close Board of Equalization Meeting. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Staff Introduction - Parks and Recreation Mr. Don Johnston was introduced as a new employee in Parks and Recreation and Solid Waste Departments. c) Staff Introduction - Police Department d) Swearing In - Police Department Nicole Sack was sworn in as a new Farmington Police Officer. The City Administrator administered the Oath of Office. e) Approve Proclamation Proclaiming Arbor DaylMonth The Mayor signed a Proclamation proclaiming April 30, 1999 as Arbor Day in Farmington and Mayas Arbor month. t) Receive Tree City USA Designation Farmington has been selected as a Tree City USA recipient. Council Minutes (Regular) April 5, 1999 Page 2 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS 7. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Soderberg, second by Strachan to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approved Council Minutes (3/15/99) (Regular) b) Received School and Conference information - Administration c) Received School and Conference information - Parks and Recreation d) Received School and Conference information - Police Department e) Approved Capital Outlay - Fire Hall Roof f) Approved Capital Outlay - Fire Department g) Adopted RESOLUTIONS R28-99 and R29-99 accepting labor negotiations settlement - AFSCME h) Adopted RESOLUTION R30-99 accepting donations - Senior Center i) Adopted RESOLUTION R31-99 accepting repeal of state sales tax on local government purchases j) Received Customer Service Satisfaction Report k) Approved bills APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Adopt Resolution - Downtown Streets cape Project The proposed project area includes 3rd Street (between Elm and Spruce Street), Oak Street (between 2nd and 4th Street) and the sidewalk connection between 2nd and 3rd Street. The original scope of the proposed project includes removing and replacing the sidewalk, trees and streetlights in the project area. The option of including neckouts at the intersection of Oak and 3rd was also presented for consideration by the Council. The installation of the City logo in the intersection is another option for Council consideration. At a neighborhood meeting, there was general support for the project from the property owners. There were four main areas of discussion which included pavers, neckouts, trees, and amenities. The total estimated project cost for Option 2 (50% pavers and 50% concrete), including the 2nd Street sidewalk connection, the neckouts and logo option, is $864,500. According to the City's Special Assessment Policy, 35% of the project costs would be assessed against the benefiting properties, and the remaining 65% of the project costs would be funded by the City. Mr. Pat Hansen, 5037 Upper 182nd Street, stated he felt the downtown shops do not require a lot of shopping, other than running in and out. He does not see the need for neckouts and does not see a lot of pedestrian traffic. The downtown businesses will have to pay for this project and he stated he does not see where they will get the money, especially the City, as it is the taxpayer's money the City is using. He does not feel it is necessary to spend the money, as there are trees and benches there now. Council Minutes (Regular) April 5, 1999 Page 3 Mr. Carrol Westenberg, Farmington Bakery, stated if the stop sign is located behind the neckout, cars will still have to stop behind the neckout. Can the crosswalk and the stop sign be at the end of the neckout to have a better view? Staff replied the drawing is a concept drawing and this issue will be reviewed. Ms. Kris Akin, 302 Oak Street, Welcome Friends, stated she is not sold on the neckouts, but understands the reason for them. She will go along with the neckouts as long as no parking spaces are lost and they are maintained and kept clean. She stated she did not know who would be responsible for maintenance, if it would be the adjacent property owner or the Parks Department. She does not want to see the money put into the project and not have it maintained. She is also concerned about semi's trying to turn the comer and driving over the neckouts and taking the trash cans and park benches with them. The Mayor replied as stated in the City ordinance, maintenance is up to the adjacent property owner. Mr. Pat Hanson, 5037 Upper 182nd Street, asked ifthe property owners wanted this. The Mayor replied it has been requested. MOTION by Strachan, second by Cordes to close the Public Hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Strachan, second by Soderberg to proceed with Option 2. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes to include the sidewalk connection to 2nd Street. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Strachan stated he is not 100% on neckouts and if neckouts are included, the loss of parking spaces does need to be considered. However, he felt the neckouts would be a nice amenity. The Mayor stated the neckouts would be inviting to people and also improve the visibility issue for traffic. Staff stated Council is authorizing the ordering of the project, not for the work to begin. The neckouts and logo option could be identified as an alternate and could be taken out of the project. There are some concerns with the maintenance of the logo and this issue is being reviewed. Councilmember Cordes stated she would not like to see the loss of parking spaces and is concerned about truck traffic. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Strachan to consider the neckouts and logo option. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg to adopt RESOLUTION R32-99, ordering the project and authorizing staff to prepare plans and specifications. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Adopt Resolution - Downtown Sanitary Sewer Sliplining Project The Council accepted the feasibility report for this project at the February 16, 1999 City Council meeting. The project consists of rehabilitating the existing clay sewer pipes on Third Street between Spruce and Elm and on Oak Street between Second and Fourth. The total estimated project cost is $194,000. Under the City's Special Assessment policy, 35% ofthe costs are assessed to the benefiting properties and the City funds the remaining 65% of the costs. The benefiting properties' share ofthe costs is $67,900. The City's share of the costs is $126,000 and would be funded through the Sanitary Sewer fund. The benefiting Council Minutes (Regular) April 5, 1999 Page 4 properties would pay for the improvements based on relative lot size, which relates to each individual property's potential for discharge to the sewer system. The project will begin in July and should be completed the end of October. Mr. Don Feely, 2nd and Oak Street, asked ifno benefit is derived from the project, is the owner still assessed? City Attorney Jamnik replied assessment can be justified on availability even if there is not an immediate connection. The Mayor asked if the property will not be built on and the connection will not be used, is the assessment deferred? Attorney Jamnik replied that is an option. That would be determined at the assessment hearing. Mr. Carrol Westenberg, Farmington Bakery, asked if it was a 15 year assessment. Staff replied it was for 15 years. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Strachan to close the Public Hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Strachan, second by Cordes ordering the project and authorizing staff to prepare plans and specifications. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT a) Adopt Resolution - 1999 Seal Coat Project Four bids were received for the 1999 Seal Coat Project. Allied Blacktop Company has submitted the low bid in the amount of $44,901. Streets in Deer Meadows 15t Addition and Deer Meadows 2nd Addition will all be seal coated for the first time. Dakota County Estates 15t Addition and several downtown streets and parking lots have not been seal coated in over seven years and are proposed to be included in the project this year. Several streets in the project area have already been assessed seal coating costs through their respective development contracts. The total estimated project cost is $62,800. The benefiting property owners would be assessed 50% ofthe project costs not to exceed $60.48 per residential unit. Councilmember Soderberg mentioned there was a question about the seal coat not taking on Spruce Street. Is there a provision to make sure it does take? Staff replied there will be inspectors to make sure the seal coat is laid properly, there will be a final inspection, and a warranty. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes adopting RESOLUTION R34-99 accepting the base bid of Allied Blacktop Company for $44,90 I and awarding the project, and directing staff to prepare the proposed final assessment roll. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Council Minutes (Regular) April 5, 1999 Page 5 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Snowmobiling Concerns - Mr. Dale Pettet Staff has received a request from a resident to restrict all motor vehicles, including snowmobiles, from any lake or pond in the City. The Mayor stated the current ordinance is banning all and allowing one. He felt we need to be consistent with all vehicles. Councilmember Strachan suggested contacting the Sno Tigers to get their opinion. Staff stated when initiated a few years ago, Lake Julia was in question. The lake is now surrounded by homes and there have been questions about snowmobiles operating on that pond and the noise. Councilmember Cordes stated Council is prohibiting snowmobiles from City owned lakes and ponds, so land surrounding the lakes is considered either park property or City property, correct? Staff replied most lakes have a 16 foot park property surrounding it. Councilmember Cordes stated so snowmobiles have to cross park property to get to the lakes. Staff replied the ordinance allows the use of park land where designated. Staff suggested bringing the ordinance amendment to the May 3, 1999 Council Meeting to enable the Sno Tigers to respond. MOTION by Strachan, second by Ristow to authorize the preparation of an amendment to Chapter 6-9-9 ofthe City Code to eliminate the exception for the operation of snowmobiles on lakes and ponds. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Soderberg stated the exception of snowmobiles will be stricken from the ordinance. Will that prohibit electric trolling motors? Staff replied an electric motor would still constitute a motorized vehicle. Farmington's process to amend an ordinance is upon receipt of a complaint. Councilmember Soderberg stated he has no objection to restricting snowmobiles. Until a complaint is received, he sees no problem allowing electric motors. Since the ordinance is being amended, he would also like to amend the ordinance to allow electric motors. Staff suggested the Park and Recreation Commission should be given an opportunity to respond as this amendment has not been brought to the Commission. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Strachan to have the Park and Recreation Commission consider amending the ordinance to allow the use of electric motors on City lakes and ponds. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Adopt Resolution - Approval of Submittal of 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update The final draft of the 2020 Farmington Comprehensive Plan Update was presented for Council's comments and recommendations. Staffwill submit the Comprehensive Plan to the Met Council on June 30, 1999. MOTION by Cordes, second by Strachan to accept the 2020 Farmington Comprehensive Plan Update and direct the City Administrator to distribute copies of the plan to adjacent jurisdictions for their review. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Nelsen Hills 5th Addition Citizen Petition The City has received a citizen petition from several residents in the Nelsen Hills 5th Addition. The concerns expressed in the petition are regarding the water levels in the pond behind the resident's homes. City staffwill be contacting the Council Minutes (Regular) April 5, 1999 Page 6 residents and the developer to set up a meeting to fully determine the scope of the residents concerns. d) MnDOT Municipal Program - Trunk Hwy 3 and Willow Street Improvements The City has applied for MnDOT funding of improvements to the east frontage road of Trunk Highway 3 at Willow Street. The state has agreed to fund $75,000 of the project costs and $6,000 ofthe construction engineering and inspection costs. In return, the City will need to accept the turnback of the frontage road. The feasibility report for this project is scheduled to be brought before the Council at the April 19, 1999 meeting. e) Accept Resignation - Planning Commission Mr. Rob Schwing, whose seat on the Planning Commission does not expire until January 31, 2000, has resigned effective March 16, 1999. The vacancy will be advertised and a Special Council Meeting will be set for May 3, 1999 for the purpose of interviewing candidates. 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Approve Joint Powers Agreement - Castle Rock Township At the March 10, 1999 joint project sub-committee meeting with Castle Rock Township representatives, substantial agreement was reached concerning the approval of the draft Joint Powers Agreement presented to Council on January 19, 1999. The Agreement will authorize the commission of a new feasibility study for the reconstruction of Ash Street and construction of Phase III of the Prairie Waterway. It is staffs understanding that Committee members Cordes and Soderberg support the JP A as amended and recommend full Council adoption. Township representatives indicated their support for the JPA as amended and stated that they would bring the agreement back to their full Board on March 23, 1999 for approval. Councilmember Cordes stated both boards agreed to bring the agreement back to their respective boards for approval. She had a meeting with Mr. Angus to discuss the Southeast side of Highway 50. Mr. Angus suggested bringing the issue to Council to provide that side with services, however that portion of the highway should remain in the township for 20 years. After 20 years they would be annexed to the City of Farmington. Councilmember Cordes stated she would bring that to the Council. She would like to see the project done, but could not guarantee anything. Councilmember Soderberg stated at the March 10, 1999 meeting they discussed the JP A and the issue that was brought up was the split of the cost of the feasibility study. They also discussed the properties on the East side ofHwy 3, and that where they remain is premature, until a feasibility study is done. Councilmember Cordes stated it is her understanding Castle Rock would like to get the scope of the project down before they enter into a JPA. Castle Rock feels Council Minutes (Regular) April 5, 1999 Page 7 the areas need to be discussed before they can authorize the spending of the money for a feasibility study. Mr. Alyn Angus stated when looking at the money being spent on the feasibility study, Castle Rock will share the cost 50-50 with the City. Two questions came up, why not resolve these before signing the JP A and authorizing expenditures. As it states in the agreement, if either party decides not to go ahead with the project, then they are responsible for all of the costs incurred. His concern is similar to Councilmember Soderberg's concern that it does not make sense not to put in the sanitary sewer line when doing this project. Mr. Angus agrees the sewer line should be put in. He feels if a trunk sewer line were installed to hook up the residents on the South side ofHwy 50 in Castle Rock, they would share the cost with more people. Also the Met Council is concerned the Prairie Waterway may cause problems with the septic systems that are existing. Castle Rock would be responsible for this. Would the City take over the responsibility or would we share that, or would we run sanitary sewer to them? He feels these issues need to be resolved before the JP A is signed. Also, Castle Rock wants some assurance that once this project is done, there will not be forced annexation of the property. He feels these issues need to be resolved, otherwise Castle Rock is ready to go ahead with the feasibility study. The Mayor asked if the Board is ready to decide, or if they would have a Hearing and let the people decide? Mr. Angus replied the Board is ready to decide. Councilmember Strachan asked what is the reason for the 20-year residency? Mr. Angus replied, Castle Rock is asking for some protection if they are going to go ahead with the project, they do not want that property forcibly annexed. If any property owner wants to be annexed, Castle Rock will let them. Castle Rock does not want to see any forced annexation take place for 20 years. The Mayor stated, but yet you want them to be hooked up for those 20 years? Mr. Angus stated if the trunk sewer line is in there and they want to be hooked up, let them. Councilmember Strachan stated if those property owners want to hook up, the City's answer will be then annex to the City. Mr. Angus wants them left in the township for 20 years, while being hooked up to the sewer line, and the owners would pay the fees. Councilmember Strachan stated the City cannot force them to pay the fees if they are not in the City. Mr. Angus stated Castle Rock would guarantee the fees. The Mayor stated that would be against Council Policy. Staff replied it is also against City Code. In terms of the provision of sanitary sewer, it would be extremely difficult for the City to exert any pressure on the owners if connected to the sewer system that is beyond City boundaries. City Code makes it unlawful for any person not in the City to connect to the City sewer system. City Attorney Jamnik stated the code would have to be changed first, which would change 30 years of policy. He advised against both parties entering into a Council Minutes (Regular) April 5, 1999 Page 8 20-year orderly annexation agreement. Councilmember Soderberg stated the County will not do the Ash Street reconstruction without the utilities in. Staff stated the City has no need aside from assisting those properties with failing septic systems, to install a sanitary sewer line along Ash Street. That is for the benefit of non-municipal properties. Councilmember Soderberg asked Mr. Angus about the Met Council concerns with septic systems failing if the Prairie Waterway and the ponding was done. Which systems did they identify as at risk? Mr. Angus replied it is the systems on the South side of Highway 50. Councilmember Soderberg asked how many of those properties have been identified as non-compliant. Mr. Angus replied 50%. The Mayor stated the JP A has been approved by the sub-committee at the March 10, 1999 meeting. Council needs to approve or reject it. Councilmember Cordes stated Council can sign the JP A, but unless a compromise is worked out, Castle Rock won't sign it and we are back to square one. Councilmember Strachan stated Council can sign the JPA and Mr. Angus and the Board can continue to discuss it. Ifthe City agrees to this part, let's move forward. Staff stated Castle Rock wanted further information on costs relating to the feasibility study. Mr. Foertsch, Township Engineering Consultant, has been directed by the Board not to do anything more relative to providing costs. We only have the information from the City Engineer, even though the direction at the. sub-committee meeting was to provide the information. Councilmember Cordes stated Council can approve this, but send a letter to Castle Rock asking them to put their concerns in writing and discuss the issues at the sub-committee meeting. The Mayor stated there is a code and policy issue. Is the Board willing to deviate from the policy and the code? Councilmember Strachan felt Council should not deviate. Properties should not be served by municipal services without annexation. Councilmember Soderberg stated if properties are being served by municipal services, they should be in the City. Mr. Angus asked about forced annexation. Council has not indicated they would forcibly annex anyone. Hooking up to City services would be choosing to come into the City. The Mayor stated Council has not made adjustments in the past. Councilmember Cordes stated she told Mr. Angus she would be willing to explore all options, but the decision lies with the Council. She would like to see the project completed. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes to approve the Joint Powers Agreement as presented. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Staff stated the City Council has lived up to all obligations put before them since moving forward to this timeline. Council has satisfied all commitments made relative to moving forward with the project. At this point, the City is ready to go. Council Minutes (Regular) April 5, 1999 Page 9 b) Adopt Resolution - Framework for Cooperative Project Efforts The Ash Street ReconstructionlPrairie Waterway III Project sub-committee met on March 10, 1999 to discuss issues relating to jointly authorizing a new project feasibility study. Councilmember Cordes stated this resolution gives a framework for the City and Castle Rock to work together. MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg to adopt RESOLUTION R36-99 establishing a framework for cooperative efforts between the City of Farmington and Castle Rock Township relative to the reconstruction of Ash Street and construction of Phase III of the Prairie Waterway. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Adopt Ordinance - Cable Franchise Agreement Staff received confirmation that Marcus Cable has accepted the terms and conditions for the renewal of the City's Cable Franchise Agreement. Mr. Tom Creighton and Mr. Rob Roeder made a presentation to Council relative to final terms and conditions of the agreement. MOTION by Strachan, second by Cordes to adopt ORDINANCE 099-427 granting a franchise to Marcus Cable Partners, a Delaware limited partnership, to construct, operate and maintain a cable system in the City of Farmington setting forth conditions accompanying the grant of the franchise providing for regulation and use of the system and the public rights-of- way, and prescribing penalties for the violation of the provisions herein. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. d) Adopt Resolution - Approving Transfer to Cable Ownership The City was notified in late 1998 by Marcus Cable that an ownership change was in the process of being negotiated with Mr. Paul Allen, owner of Vulcan Cable Company, Inc. Mr. Tom Creighton has reviewed the transfer of ownership document and found it does not violate any state or federal laws. MOTION by Cordes, second by Verch to adopt RESOLUTION 37-99 approving the conditional transfer of ownership interest from Marcus Cable Company to Vulcan Cable Company. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE a) Train Whistle Blowing - Council Update The City Attorney suggested a Council member be appointed to the League of Minnesota Cities Railroad Task Force to replace former Councilmember Gamer. The Mayor will tentatively attend the meetings, or the City Administrator. An FRA representative will be contacted to be at the June 21, 1999 Council Meeting. Councilmember Strachan: At the ALF annual meeting he was informed an ambulance will be placed in Farmington from noon to 10 p.m. everyday starting next Spring. Councilmember Verch: He has received questions from citizens regarding parking off the pavement in the grass. Staff replied the ordinance is enforced by complaint. The citizens should contact the Police Department. Council Minutes (Regular) April 5, 1999 Page 10 City Attorney Jamnik: He has received three evaluations for the City Administrator's performance review, two are pending. Police Chief Siebenaler: Commended the Fire and Police Department members for their efforts in the missing person search. Mayor Ristow: He received a letter of appreciation from the Spruce apartments complimenting the Fire and Police Departments. The new name plates in the Council Chamber are courtesy of Mr. Dick Graelish. 14. ADJOURN Council went into Executive Session at 10: 1 0 p.m. Executive Session adjourned at 10:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ;;~/7?~ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7) TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administratorq.?t-- FROM: James Bell, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - Accept Grant - Senior Center DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION A grant has been received at the Senior Center from Utili Corp United. DISCUSSION UtiliCorp United, which is the parent company of Peoples Natural Gas, has awarded a $500 grant to the Senior Center for window replacement and benches. This grant program is designated for cities to fund beautification and energy savings projects. Staff intends to have the two large 3rd Street windows, which are fogged over, replaced. The additional dollars necessary for this project will come from the recent pancake breakfast profits. The bench purchase will be delayed until the style of downtown benches necessary for the new downtown street project are determined. Staff will communicate the City's appreciation on behalf of the Council to UtiliCorp United for their generous grant. BUDGET IMPACT Two quotations were received for the window replacement. 1. D & J Glass $924.84 2. Fairfield Glass & Window $369.00 The pancake breakfast was very successful and generated a profit of $1,351.73. The additional funds needed to replace the two windows will come from these funds. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution accepting the grant of $500 to the Senior Center from UtiliCorp United and replace the two windows at the Senior Center. Respectfully submitted, " )c""",., , ' () (I ,~"-~V James Bell Parks and Recreation Director PROPOSED RESOLUTION No. ACCEPTING GRANT OF $500 FROM UTILICORP UNITED Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 19th day of April, 1999 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, the City has received a grant for $500 to be used for window replacement at the Senior Center; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept such grants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby accepts the grant of $500 from UtiliCorp United to be used to fund window replacement at the Senior Center. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 19th day of April, 1999. Mayor Attested to the day of April, 1999. City Administrator SEAL City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us le, FROM: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator~ James Bell, Parks and Recreation Director TO: SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation From Dakota Electric DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION Adopt a resolution accepting a donation from Dakota Electric. DISCUSSION Dakota Electric annually donates a tree in conjunction with Arbor Day to Cities in their service area. Denise Rorty of their office has notified staff that the company would again like to donate a Red Maple to the City. Staff will plant this tree as part of the annual Arbor Day activities. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution accepting the donation of a Red Maple from Dakota Electric. Respectfully submitted, ~o-~ James Bell Parks and Recreation Director PROPOSED RESOLUTION No. ACCEPTING DONATION FROM DAKOTA ELECTRIC Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 19th day of April, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, Dakota Electric has proposed to donate a Red Maple tree to the City; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept such donations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby accepts the donation of a Red Maple from Dakota Electric. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 19th day of April, 1999. Mayor Attested to the 19th day of April, 1999. City Administrator SEAL City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us lei TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator~ FROM: Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager SUBJECT: RFP, Audio Visual Consultant, City Council Chambers DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION Staff requests Council authorization to seek Requests for Proposal for the design of an audio visual system for the City Council Chambers. DISCUSSION As a result of the new Cable Franchise Agreement, the City will receive a $60,000 capital grant that may be used for capital equipment acquisitions and physical enhancements to the Council Chambers for purposes relating to the public broadcasting of public government programming. An Audio Visual Consultant will provide services for the design of an audio visual system as required for cable broadcasting. BUDGET IMPACT The costs associated with the preparation of the RFP and of the proposed consultant will be eligible expenditures of the $60,000 grant. ACTION REQUESTED Authorize the transmittal of a Request for Proposal for Consulting Services for the design of an Audio Visual system in Council Chambers. Respectfully submitted, JAvv- \~ Karen Finstuen Administrative Services Manager AUDIO VISUAL CONSULTANT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL City of Farmington State of Minnesota For Use in Televising Public Meetings April 19, 1999 GENERAL INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS Purpose The purpose of this Request For Proposal (RFP) is to provide interested firms with sufficient information to prepare and submit qualifications for consideration by the City of Farmington, Minnesota, to provide audio visual consultant services for the design of an audio visual system as required for cable broadcasting. The meetings to be broadcast will take place in the existing Council Chambers of the Farmington City Hall at 325 Oak Street. Issuine Office This RFP is issued by the City of Farmington Administrative Department, Farmington, Minnesota. Questions regarding this RFP may be directed to Ms. Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager, telephone number (651) 463-1802. Proiect Statement The City of Farmington proposes an audio visual system as required for cable broadcasting, which may be adequate to be used at another location should Council Chambers be moved to a larger facility at some future date. Services Required The audio visual consultant will be requested to provide the following basic services: Design Phase I. Consult with staff to evaluate the current system and method of operation. 2. Consult with staff to develop and analyze the new system encompassing areas of audio visual systems. 3. Develop an outline of proposed new systems. Review the proposed systems with the owner prior to proceeding with the detailed specifications. 4. Develop an estimate of the probable costs associated with the purchase and installation of the system. 5. Develop a detailed specification for bidding. 6. Recommend bidding procedure, including work scope. Bidding Phase 1. Locate, screen and pre-qualify bidders for Owner approval. 2. Develop proposal forms for each bid category. 3. Assist in the preparation of the forms for the bid. 4. Make award recommendation. Type of Contract Compensation for any contract entered into as a result of this Request For Proposal will be based upon a total not to exceed cost. Rejection of Proposals The City of Farmington reserves the right to reject all proposals received as a result of this RFP, or to negotiate separately with any other source what so ever in any manner necessary to serve it's best interest. This RFP is issued for information and planning purposes only. The City of Farmington does not intend to award a contract solely on the basis of responses to this request, or otherwise pay, for the information, solicited, or obtained, prior to the execution of a Contract. Addenda to the RFP In the event it becomes necessary to revise any part of this RFP, an Addenda will be provided to all parties who have received the base RFP. Response Date and Receiving Office To be considered, five (5) copies of the proposal must be submitted to the issuing office on or before May 21, 1999 at 4:30 p.m. Fax responses will not be accepted. Selection Timetable for Audio Visual Consultant Final selection will be made no later than June 8, 1999. Estimate of the total not to exceed fee schedule is as follows: Fee for audio visual consultant costs, including personnel, overhead and profit, fee for reimbursable expenses, total lump sum fee all inclusive. The following information must be submitted in the order and format presented below. If you would like to submit information which is not required, please include it as item 5. I. Company background information . Name of Firm . Location of principal and branch offices . Length of time in business . Firm ownership structure 2. Personnel and project staffing . List the personnel that will be assigned to the project. Please include a short resume of each of the individuals. . List any outside firms which will be used to provide services. 3. Experience . List projects in which the firm and individuals have served as an audio visual consultant during the past three years. For each project list: a. Project name and address b. Year started and completed c. Type of project d. Actual cost e. Owner 4. Fees . Identify the fees. Separate the fees for the design and the equipment costs. 5. Approach . Based upon information contained in this Request for Proposal, prepare a preliminary work plan identifying the specific tasks necessary to accomplish the objectives. . Detail in a simple and straight forward manner, the approach the consultant proposes. 6. Schedule . Include a schedule for completion. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7e TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator1'~ FROM: James Bell Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Agreements for Clean Up Day DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION Clean Up Day has been scheduled for Saturday, May 15, 1999 and the City will be contracting with various vendors to provide services. DISCUSSION Agreements with J.R.'s Appliance Disposal, Inc., Greenman Technologies, Inc., and Mendota Heights Rubbish are needed to provide services for Clean Up Day. The City has successfully used these contractors for past clean up day activities. BUDGET IMPACT Funding for Clean Up Day activities is included in the Solid Waste operations budget. There are adequate funds available for these contracts. RECOMMENDATION Approve agreements for Spring Clean Up Day services with the following vendors: 1) J.R.'s Appliance Disposal, Inc. for appliances 2) Greenman Technologies, Inc. (formerly BFI Tire Recycling, Inc.) for tires 3) Mendota Heights Rubbish Service for general waste and scrap metal recycling ,j~l:S~:9:Q_ James Bell Parks and Recreation Director cc: file, Benno Klotz, Lena Larson City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us 7,( TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrato~ FROM: Ken Kuchera, Fire Chief SUBJECT: School and Conference - Fire Department DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION The Fire Department is planning the attendance of volunteer fire fighters at the Annual State Fire School in St. Paul, April 23-25, 1999. DISCUSSION Attendees for the Annual State Fire School in St. Paul are Jeff Jacobson, Bob Ellingsworth, and Joe Tullar. Course topics include Advanced Fire Cause and Determination, Water Rescue, and Aerial Apparatus Operations. BUDGET IMP ACT This conference provides economical training opportunities with minimal travel expense and no lodging cost. Funding is provided in the 1999 Budget. ACTION REQUESTED For information only. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Ken Kuchera Fire Chief City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us ~ TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~ FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Deer Meadows Project Update DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION At the March 15, 1999 council meeting, the City Council ordered drainage improvements to be installed in the rear yards of several residences north of 1 80th Street. The Council also directed staff to meet with the developer to determine if he was willing to participate in the costs of the improvements. DISCUSSION Staff met with the developer and the developer indicated that he is not willing to participate in the costs of the project. This project is closed out and the swale where the improvements are to be installed is in substantial conformance with the approved plans. Therefore, it is staff s opinion that the City has little or no recourse to force the developer's participation in the costs of this project. The City Attorney concurs with this VIew. BUDGET IMPACT The total estimated project cost is $29,500. ACTION REQUESTED For information only. Respectfully submitted, ~>>?~ Lee M. Mann, P .E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7~ TO: Mayor, Council Members, City AdministratoJ..ee Michael Schultz f)() Associate Planner V FROM: SUBJECT: First Quarter 1999 Building Report DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION The following is a report summarizing the new construction permits issued during the first quarter of 1999. DISCUSSION During the first quarter of the 1999 building construction season the City issued 45 new single-family detached housing permits. There were no new attached housing units (townhomes, twin homes), commercial, institutional or industrial building permits issued during the quarter. The number of single-family permits is down in comparison to the first quarter of 1998 when 73 new single-family permits were issued, a decrease of 38%. This year's first quarter is comparable to first quarter 1997 when the same amount of permits were issued which resulted in a total of 245 new housing permits, which was slightly below the 275 projected yearly new housing starts. In 1998 the City issued 290 new housing permits. ACTION REQUIRED No action is required, for City Council information only. Respectfully Sub 7l1ck Michael Schultz Associate Planner YEAR-TO-DATE BUILDING PERMIT SUMMARY REPORT 14-APR-1999 (11:51) page 1 BL PERMIT WORK Y TYPE TYPE QUANTITY VALUATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 99 01 SFD 80 NEW 45 5,143,000.00 01 SFD 81 REMODEL/ALT 3 400.00 01 SFD 82 ADDITION 1 12,531. 00 01 SFD 83 REPAIR 2 70,000.00 01 SFD 84 INTERIOR FINIS 40 124,880.00 01 SFD 88 RESIDE 3 01 SFD 89 REROOF 7 <*> 101C 5,350,811. 00* 04 COMMERCIAL 81 REMODEL/ALT 3 304,344.00 04 COMMERCIAL 89 REROOF 1 4,500.00 <*> 4C 308,844.00* 07 PUBLIC REROOF 2 8,080.00 <*> 2C 8,080.00* 12 DECK 82 ADDITION 7 18,070.00 12 DECK 84 INTERIOR FINIS 1 1,640.00 <*> 8C 19,710.00* <*> 115C 5,687,445.00* 1 EDURE: YTDBLSUM City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us lOa., TO: Mayor and Councilmembers City Administrator1~ FROM: David L. Olson Community Development Director SUBJECT: Request for Comments / Housing Tax Credit Applications DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION The Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program was established by Congress in 1986 by enactment of Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The Tax Credit program provides a reduction in federal income tax liability to owners of and investors in low income rental housing developments through the allocation of certain Tax Credits to such owners. DISCUSSION The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHF A) has been designated by the Minnesota Legislature as the primary allocator of Tax Credits in Minnesota. In addition, certain local government entities are authorized to allocate a portion of the credits available. Dakota County HRA has been designated as a sub-allocator and has been authorized to allocate $352,071 in 1999. One of the steps in the County's application process is to allow cities where proj ects are being proposed an opportunity to comment on the projects proposed in their communities. The following is a brief summary of the two projects proposed in Farmington that are seeking an allocation of Tax Credits. East Farmington Site Sherman and Associates Inc. of Minneapolis is proposing to develop a 16 unit townhome project on the portion of the East Farmington PUD located at the corner of Larch Street and the newly aligned TH 3 Frontage Road south of Budget Mart. This portion of the PUD was approved for multi-family up to 20 units in the original approved Schematic PUD Plan. The proposed plan consists of four buildings each containing four units for a total of 16 units. Each unit would be a two story unit with three bedrooms with a one-car attached garage. As the site plan indicates, the buildings would be situated such that each unit backs up to a common open space similar to the layout of the single-family blocks of East Farmington. The Developer will still be required to seek Preliminary and Final PUDlPlat approvals. The proposed rents would be considered to be affordable to persons at 50% of the median income for Dakota County. This translates to rent of $722 per month plus an additional $68 utility allowance to be paid by the renter. This project applied for and received a partial allocation of tax credits from Dakota County HRA in 1998. The developer is seeking the balance of the tax credits for which this project qualifies. The City Council previously reviewed this project in February of 1998 and indicated support for the concept of developing additional affordable rental housing in the City of Farmington. Trunk Highway 3 and County Rd 66 Site Jim Deanovic and the Minnesota Attainable Housing Corporation propose to form a limited partnership called Farmington Family Housing, LLC to develop 28 rental townhome units on property located at TH 3 and County Road 66 (also known as the Sprute Severson Property). This property is currently zoned A-I (Agriculture) however it is designated for medium density residential on the current and proposed Comprehensive Plan and is currently in the MUSA. The Developer will need to seek a zone change as well as Preliminary and Final Plat approval for the site. The proposed plan consists of seven four-unit townhome buildings clustered around a circular private court along the south side of County Road 66. There would be 14 two bedroom units and 14 three-bedroom units. All of the units would be two-story townhome type units with one car attached garages. The majority of the two-bedroom units would have rents at $621 plus a $62 utility allowance to be paid by the renter. The majority of the three-bedroom units would have rents at $711 with a $79 utility allowance also paid by the renter. This project is applying for tax credits for the first time and is also seeking partial financing from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. Summary The City is not required to take any official action regarding either of these proposed projects. The City however has the option of providing comments either in support or opposition to either of the proposed projects. As the attached article as well as numerous other articles, reports, and studies indicate, demand for affordable rental housing far exceeds the supply in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area and Greater Minnesota as well. The City has committed to promoting the development of additional rental housing as part of its previously adopted goals under the Livable Communities Act. Both sites that are being proposed for rental projects are designated for multi-family housing in the City's Comprehensive Plan. BUDGET IMP ACT Neither of these projects are requesting financial assistance from the City of Farmington. ACTION REQUESTED In keeping with the objectives ofthe Livable Communities Act, authorize the submittal of a letter supporting the development of affordable rental housing as proposed at the East Farmington Site and the Trunk Highway 3 and County Road 66 site. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ?--~ David L. Olson Community Development Director Cc: George Sherman Jim Deanovic . .9! ... ...0 .' .... . .I'l;to'. ~. .... ::!l ~ e 2l::!t '" .~.g '" <.. ,'" ..... ...... ..... ... . .s"~<)';' 0)' ..&!; .....~~.~ .1~!; 0~.s8. ,g8 .fl,g3 gj~. ~. :12=1;\",; . '" .":fP5;s:l~ .~,!!~ ~.~ i~~. ~i~!i'~:S l~'i~~'~.fl.fl ~~t!~~jlt.8 ~~~~~'~!'~~~~.~l~I~~~i j~: 1;) ~ ~ ~s~.~~~;~.~~] ~~~]~IR~ ~..~~~'~~.~;~l ~!1:g.~~~.~~~~~.ff~8i~~..~. .~~id ! ...... tj:i:J ~.Q en I:l == Q) ......... ~ Ul co = >.d C'..l co ~ 0.= ~ .:i lot_ == 0 rn ()~ClS . S tt:: ~ ..... H Ui!nhm~ji!ftu~i iJiillUH !.;~bUUJHHjf~I'H~~1 <(&~ ID~~ ~1~ i ~~~iJ Iii Jll rHI!! ~~]:; ~i~!jl~ ~~i~1i~ ~jl~!i1 ~.Iiijj~li~ ... F= l'I1 c..11l ._.:::lte_ == ~ l3 "C..c u () co v.I.:: 'i=i u......_ 0 ~.t:::+:J (;0....._ ti=i........c ch C'..l fh ...... Q.(1)ilIj CI)~ """-t CO UJ.~""" c..s:: 0 ~ c: o .- ..... c: CD = m fn ~ c 1-. .i -c CDJ: lu u c: ::J l- t) C) c: .- fn ::J o J: CD - .c m ~ ~ <C ~ ~ ,.g. "8 ::::;; z ~ -' => co ti; li' .1 f ~ 6 ~'i: E ~ I': '" ,~ 0 <lo .Q~~Q) Q) o~ Ul~ 8 ~, ~ 5 .Bo..~tO C'..lCl)-;:O '-og~ CJ~=6lJ -g cu:Eo.c == ~cE 6 8 6 ~~ ~-;~,... ~ ~~'::~-E~ .5 g C v . .51.. sg 1':0 :' 8"';> 0 ii:" ~:;.. '" >,7,... ;3 '" "" '" 5l =0 '" - 0 ~ .. O'C - ~ .c .~ - ~ ii '" '" .~ ~~=~ ~~~"C 16';~=~~~~S -j5~~ ~g~~ ~~CI)a .;~:~'=~~.5~~~ i~~'Tg ~~",; ii!!l~~ ~~5l-~~6~."'~ >,,g,,,I~ . _><c -"tlll'.c-I':.c:::...l",I':"''''''' '" I':-~ c ~~~<1JB ~e~=~~.gcu.~o~J:iQ><v~e b.ll~O;.....:I ~ ~~Itlll ~~~~a~i~6l,~ii~~~~i "'~~~~ oC ..'" I': tlll'" """,.~. 1':" "''''''''''t "''''.'''_c [/) e [/)..... = t: <1J 0 > "t:I :s ~:=" cu'::: en'C .3 co C'3 io>>1,'- ~ nr Q)Q)~gj: ._oC'..l':::~~b.llo[/)=~-='''t:I .cC'..l='blIS:::; ~ ii~"'o 1""~~~iE~~"'a~s5~E ."'3~5~ 'tJ - [/),.c =' Q...w w Q) <~ ...._~ ~- ~"Qi <v,,_-':; c ~~~,S ,~~'~B~:~i~o~~~~::~i~~jo~ ~ J:: ",'S: .s.. ~.5 "" .5 I': '" ~ ",.s:;;: .!!l'e. ~ (,)...fi.5 GI ~ .: ,[/) <-0 bJ) 0 ~ a'S ~c O. <1J ~ ~ ~~~,~'~!i~ ~~15~ ~=s~ ~s~~~iR ~ -5 ~~~~~.!!l,5,g~E:J ~.;s~~g~~~~", .~.;:g~~~~ o ~ ~ 5..2 Q..~~ <1J"t:I Q):;~ 'C e g e ~ ~~~.c ~'g if~.E E: ~S..Q .c "" C o~ ",..-'!l '" F= '" ""0'" 0 S.c2l.c.Bii 0 olE 0 01':=.;:: c: ,= ca <1J'" ctl,.c cu..B.~ ~ [/) <Li "t:I,.c "C C'..I ctl tJ)'- - ~ ~ t) C'..I 0 - C'..I ~:o :s: it ~ .'0 ~~~:: e.s~ 0 fE "'3.~.8 ~== ~ ~8"t:1:: ~ 'QJ ~~ ~ Q) C'3 ~ s ~11;i;il~t!IJ~~,5.I~~i~li~ 11ii)il t~d~J~",,~~-..:a~sg~6oo~~""g:.c; ~,g~]~~,g ~1!,gi~ ~.fl'iU 0 0 g~ S~.~:; ",.s 8Q~~.fl g S .: !;.5 8,!!"g <, ~~~~_.c ~"'IR.O~",0~8s~l':~ =m .~~~",~b~ ~ ::l'g.fli ~.~tlll~. :;;: ~t.:~ co i;,!!ii..!; '" ca,gs't,s:a S ~ 8.::1 ~ l:r~.g ",,,, ~RCI':", ';;>8o""a~ ""I': ~ ~",-..",~~~ ~~Sj~~~iJ2~~~~u&~~i~~~a~i~>~~~~~~ CD .""' u ~ - I" S ~ii"o ~.' <il . -8e~ "'.. .c' oi~~. '" .g. ~'t~~ ~2'ti ~~.~ .~1l:5! ~'~-8.s8 5~ d-g~;~.s ~ ~ ;ii"",,,,~,~ I':~ :;~o ~~~. :Iit;,o OS~j;..gjs .sl ~~lf~J~ll! i~j A;I~~I.:I~ltIJ~ '" ;> .. :;.c...:o:J'C R C ." I': " .;_ '" ;> '" '" -" '" ::l '" ...... '" 0 ....c ~"'''' '~-"'c"'''' "'&0 cc=s.8':!!.2!:o:J"''''-'''''",0-",";: "''''' _I': ~~.~ ZI': ~",.c:l2~ e-"'oz~~ - 0 ~'" !!l,s""~E8",!li",,,, ;tlll5:'l .~",.s,g"".52-",~0~38'" .. a 0 ~.Q"g "'"0 i1!. sn~ ii "" I': ~ -5 "'"0 2l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"E "" "'.. 0 . e I] ~1!!il;ltJ~IJI~:~IJlI1~t;II!I~ =0 OO';"t:I= .-"t:I~~C'..I= ~O~=C'..I~Octl S2~0~~ 0 5:' vi ~c;,:.:g ~ ~~ ~'i~.5 ~ ~-5.s ~ ~~ ~-; r3~ ~(Z)~~ a~.;.g e ~ ~e~=u~~~~~~._~b~otJ)J~~a~e~~~M...~~~O~ l:ll =0'" ~ ~ SJ ~:g !!lo 0: ~- 8 e:: !!lo ~o's p ~ I's:. &! ~'" I ~ 8 e:: tlll.~ ~ ~ e:: ~ 8:", ~ go.. ~ ",~5l ~~.c~~~ .cu~ ~Sa ~~5B B~~~ ~"'~"" ,~ 'iI = GI ,,, Ii 'S o. :t= III C o r! j '> E E ~ " c '" ~ ~ ~ ~O, en cC1' "0 _ Q) ~~ ~o !I~ '~i's ,~ ~~j~ ~=~ i,.,,1 1 ~ s li~~I~J 11~ ~~J~JI~~~~i t;:~~~~ i~~111 ~ ~il~~~ .~ U ]~~ ~~~.n'l~ ~ .~i'~~]!.s~! U~~ ~ ~:;;:0.s8~~ S''''i~~+lgo.'''f!O.s,gN~~ il~=~.~~~""; iii5i<1 t;il~~l IJ!l~li;ljllll! 'l~l~l]t~I~.!; -'a '" "'.c.. ~ '" "'-".c~~.s~ """, 0 c 0 c '" '" ",...:Ii"'.c ~ R 0' R'" ..c .","'-5"'Jo .b~",,,, ",~e5-0--" ~~-..a", .Q+lboJO~ - Q..OO 0"E:+;;i - ;::::l [/) ~ - ~ Q.) C'..I ~ Q,,"tS C'..I.!!3 "t:I CI) IV ~..w tJ) - 9J _10'1 ,- - Q. bJ) .;3 0 .s ~ '", 0 "',rj ~:;; tlll~ ... e ii ~. '" '" ~c= ;:a ': l;; 3 5l'>,~ 3 <il'iU 3 ~.~ ".8 ~~os~b!C'..Ie~=~oo5...~vi~~'~~U)~ >~:=~g~Q)~3'5'-C'..I~"t:I !3 f.~ e~~'~ ~ <~'g.i.!3 '8"'.f3:~:~ 28 ~.~.g.g.g 8 g:ga ~~ ~~< g~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~_~C'..I ._C'..I~ ' ~C'..I.C'..IC. ,.c_~~~ ~~~~~U)~ uQ,,~S:::;tJ) ~ .!!l e ~ ",'g . ~.. s "',. to":' '" '" _ -"l . +l ;>.c >. '" <2 '" '" i !!l ~ ~ O~SQ'" "lil'."~~>," ..-.. Sii ;>"" '" ",,,, .... ~ :a i~~~.fl ~~~m~,5~ "'~~]~f ~]~~J]g ~~~~.c ] , ~ ~ ii . '" .. 0 <il 0..... ~ '" 2..1i!'.c >'ii ~ ij:o:J -.: sg ;> j '" "'! .~ j~.s.s~'til~~:~~i~ il~$i.s~.fliJ~J;,g ~~~~. i ~~=",SB 1~...~~", J~-"l~iiaoo~",,,,~~,,, ~~'til '" ~o 0 ",-.c "'!:l 0 ~ '" - ""'..:3'.c ~'" 'f":~ S= .~-- '" 1lC ~ e :a=2 ~''''aii~'~ i ""~;c= 0" ii.~:;=::: ~ "= ~ 1Jl I': g :'3 ~~ Jt~~~i~ii3'j~~ ~;~8~5~5~~g~..; ~~8i~ i 1II!!1S'~O_..!!a-5.Si.!gof~-"l ~. '~j~"=:C~1:lB>,~~"'...g".e',,'" '" 5<L) d~~~~:a~~8+l~ I':l!!l'1':8~",.~.!:l~~8a~~i~~~~, ~ 'c Cij~lil.g I':ii.~ .01':..cI':S~.s~"'g.~.!3 ~ 'a ~~'''' ':,. ] ~1h~~.~~i~J&~~ ~]]~ ~ ~~: B ~.~~~".~b'~l~ III OS t: ",.c= '" >'''':o:J ",.s.c S ~.~~'iU S .8.t::.Siii~ii ~ ;S~ii.c '" 0 0 en 0 ~ 0 '" .; ui '0 '0 CD 0 0 ..c ..c .. ~ ~ ::s co . ::l ::l 0 0 .. ..c ..c U '0 '0 ~ ~ .- ~ D. .5 0; 'e- m w <L C .- ut ~ ::s 0 .c CD 'a .- ~ CD .. " .. U) i ~ :6 ca ~ m C) ~~ ~ as .5 rn~Je ! ! ~.s 5 (3 Oeo- (!::E E c &;.0) ~.E E (I) ~ i~ .s!.~ 8: .s N...;....5.6c:; :28 ~ OJ Ill.s ,a'O M'~ ~~ ::3"'t-51i~ CIl~...c.= J .s 'Oo::(c::n. ~i~I ~r;:fc: ~.~~f! ~~e.s dl;f8ril EAST FARMINGTON SITE r IEB U) I I--'- ~~ L %~ u i 2 ~ i-----FRONTAGE I I I I I I I I I ~ I ~ I ,.., I ~ ;IE I C'-' ~ ---- ~ r- ---- I I I I I I I ~ II I I I I I I I I I I I I L _._ _. .-.- NlNlH STREET l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Iii 12 i~ I I I I I I I I I I I I -.J - o ... ~~ ~~ -< C) ~ :z III Cl ::J ~ :z < ~ a D:: :z ~ 175 ~ ~ ~~ Bi 0 ~ '=or 2S ::&:: :::I!.... a.. ~ :::>:z ~ ~ ~8 a:I ::;) ~ - i!~ 0 ~ Cl .... i!!5 F ~b G:I,.!. I- II ~~ ~- Pi o . I I I ':1'0 .M SlSStIlI. JOOll I ~ r------------ ::I ::I ~ ... R 1! d ! 1fi S . = ~ a . Do I I Ii Ii 3dlJ1; ) II '" I NIOlI ,!. 5! $! .. ~ . ~ ; ... . ~ ... . I: ~ 0 S I r.-, ----- C".l ~ 0 D ~ ~ ~ I ~ I~ I ~ Do . i ... ~ ... --------- "O-.S ,,0-. ~f ..O-.S~ :z ~ Cl.. . a:: 0 o I o ~ -' II L..... . -,.eg, ~ ~ ~ LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT APPLICATION Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program , Multifamily Underwriting 400 Sibley Street - Suite 300 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1998 (612) 297-3294 MHFA USE ONLY: MHFA #: NOTE: Do not attempt to complete this application without reading the MHFA Tax Credit Procedural Manual, and Section 42 of Internal Revenue Code. An incomplete Form L1HC-1 will not be accepted and will be returned to the applicant/developer. is1..:~.,~'\':;;APp,LlCATIO N,\'\1:YPE\ Chec Rid 0 ne . . Stage of Application Date Submitted:I Carryover: October 13, 1998 EJ Initial Application/ Reservation o Commitment! Carryover Allocation . D Placed in Service 1;2~;%:<PROJ ECTJifN AM E"FAN O:tAD D.R ESSP.( Corn'p lete.:~~the:Zjnform'atj on}'list~d':;' be lowl;;.r;~.,~;:;j;,1 Name: Address: City: FARMINGTON TOHNHOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Highway 3 and Larch Street Farmington, State: County: Zip Code: Minnesota Dakota 55024 (Any changes in site location or loss of site control invalidates application). · Amount of Annual Credit Currently Requested · Amount Previously Allocated · Previous Source and Year Allocated · L1HC No. Please check the appropriate set-aside (Nonprofits must sign page 17): $47.414 $ RR, 176 Dakota Countv HRA. 1998 D Greater MN For-profit r::L Metro ~ For-profit D D Greater MN Non-profit Metro Non-profit D D Rural Housing Servicesl Small Project Flood Disaster Relief Area/Federal Disaster Relief No. DRl175 13;':""~"":'T'Y:OE~:<'OF""":OW"INCOME""'HO USING....T.A.X '.:CREDIT'.REQUESTEDi"...."..~;:"'.. ..,......... .,. ...,..,........... ....1 . ,.:,...:.,'1+: i.~. /:;;... ..1;}L. . '. .)~ ...... .. . '.:; . . .'. . ... '. ,".". '. 'f';' .. . .;, , . ..',j;<~".:'.7".&"~};":;,:...:'?::::<.'<<,:.-.;::~. New Construction without Federal Subsidies New Construction with Federal Subsidies B D D Acquisition/Rehabilitation without Federal Subsidies D D Acquisition/Rehabilitation with Federal Subsidies Acquisition/Rehabilitation with 10 year waiver . MHFA FORM L1HC-1 1 (1/98) " 3. TYPE OF LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT REQUESTED Yes xx No Is this project using RHD funds? Is this project using HUD Section 8 rental assistance? project based or No Yes xx tenant certificates and vouchers Is this project using HOME funding? Yes xx No Are any of the above to be treated as "Federal Funds"? Yes xx No The Owner irrevocably elects one of the minimum set-aside requirements (check one only) 20% of the units serving households at 50% of the area median vv . 40% of the units serving households at 60% of the area median Resolution Trust Corporation Funding in this Project? Yes xx No ....... ... . ;:''--r:'ii,~,. <'," , ':<:'f.~:~;:'~~;;\~ I 14.;,,:;;~ P ROJ E CT:.< IN FOR MATI 0 N::' .; ';< '.' ...,0' :'-,r:',;"':~',~:;,>:~:, Term of the Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants This project will remain low-income with the occupancy described for 15 or 30 years. (Circle one.) Total Low-income Targeting (These rent restrictions must be consistent with rents indicated in Section 10, page 6.) ~(#) of Low-income units will serve households at 60% of the area median income _(#) of Low-income units will serve households at 50% of the area median income ._(#) of Low-income units will serve households at _ % of the area median income lumber of Residential Buildings 4 Number of Stories: 2 Type of Housing xx Multifamily Residential CHOOSE ONE: [:l Row Houseffownhouse o Garden Apartment CHOOSE ONE: ~ Slab on Grade Single Family o o o Detached Two Family Detached Single Family Elevator Building o D D Full Basement Crawl Space Partial Basement Describe type and indicate whether or not a fee is charged: Accessory Buildings & Area: List Recreation Facilities: Commercial Facilities: Gross Floor Area of all Buildings: ?4,ROO (Square Feet) Separate Fee Charged: None Nnnp Yes Yes Yes No No No Nann Non-Residential Floor Area: Non P. (Square Feet) Targeting of Units (Indicate type and number of units) o Elderly, number of units: Ox Family, MHF A FORM L1HC-1 ~ number of units: (1/98) 2 " D D [3 o o Handicapped, number of units: SRO, number of units: Homeless. number of units: HIV/AIDS Housing, number of units: Other, number of units: 16 Census Tract Number Is this project located in a State Senate District Congressional District 609 Economic Development Region 37 Qualified Census Tract or State House District 37 A Region Difficult Development Area? 6 Is site part of an organized plan? documentation. xx Yes No If yes explain and provide I$~::.': SITE/Za N I N G-/ I N Fa RMA TI a N:>,,;:.;::,~; :",.. "';..:;'}:&:~-::':':'::!':;-'. ~'.: ',,'.: ". ", . ~ '.} ~~~.';<':> ;:-::.._~:t<ii' ':\::;'~,:-- ~. .;;..::-<..... """1 p'<." . "'.:" Site Control (e.g. ownership, option, purchase contract, or long-term lease) is a requirement for eligibility for a tax credit reservation. Is site currently under control? xxx Yes No Control is in the form of (include documentation): _~x _ Deed Option Lease Other (specify) Expiration date of contract or option Renewable? D Yes D No MonthlYear Name of Seller: Address: City: Phone Number: Sienna Corporation 49~O Viking Drive #608 Edina. MN (612) 835-2808 State/Zip Code: 55435 Is site properly zoned? xx Yes If no, is site currently in the process of rezoning? No Yes If yes, include third party documentation No When is zoning issue scheduled to be resolved (month and year)? 16'~<->AP P LI CANT} I N FC RMA TIC N'-::rMAI LI N G:::;-ADD RESS;,~.~" '::::t-~t' > ;- .,..~<:.::. I The applicant must be a legal entity (e.g. partnership, corporation etc.) or individual. Applicant is current owner and will retain ownership. xx Applicant is the Project Developer and will be part of the final ownership entity Applicant is the Project Developer and will not be part of the final ownership entity. (Complete Sec.7.E.) Name(s): Address: City: FARMINGTON TOWNHOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1525 South Fourth St. /1200 State: Minnesota Minneapolis. . Zip Code: 55454 Contact Person: Telephone: George E. Sherman (612) 332-3000 Fax: (612) 332-8119 MHFA FORM L1HC-1 3 {1/9c 7.. PARTNERSHIP INFORMATION (Complete L1HC-19) (Please note: The MHFA reserves tax credits to the partnership and General Partners. Reservations are not transferable. Any change in General Partner status requires MHFA approval. The Partnership and the General Partner(s) should not have the same Federal Tax t.0 Numbers.) Name: FARMINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Fed. Tax 10 No.: Applied For Name of General Partner(s) Sherman Associates Affordable Suburban Housing Telephone 332-3000 835-5498 % Ownership .5 % .5 % % Fed. Tax 10 No. 41-1709024 41-1671074 Required materials: articles of incorporation, by-laws, partnership agreement and other relevant information regarding legal status Required materials: articles of incorporation, IRS letter of 501 (c)3 or 501 (c) 4 status, nonprofit Certificate of Inco~oration and Certificate of Good Standing (Sec'y of State), nonprofit set-aside eligibility questionnaire description of material participation in ownership and management. Type of Sponsor General Partnership* xx Limited Partnership* Limited liability Co. Corporation* Individual xXNonprofit Corporation** ~~~) Local Government Housing Authority Other (specify) B. Legal Status of Sponsor Incorporated C. Nonprofit Status of Sponsor 501 (c)(3) Registered 501 (c){4) 501 (a) Exemption D. Capacity of Applicant xx Developer Contractor xx General Partner Other (Specify) _. If the Applicant is the Project Developer, who will not retain ownership, briefly describe the planned process and timing for - disposition of this project. 8 -~>.ESTIMA TED> P ROJ E CT~.;:A P P Ll CAB LE'; FRACTI ON.:D ETER MINA TI 0 N:;;-:;L>;'::"'~:,-"~";~':;.:-.;'-<: ':":.-'.' .",' .-" '-. . '" . This section is to be completed at initial application and carryover. At placed in service, attach a Building Map (L1HC-28) for each building to the 8609 Worksheet (L1HC-4) to calculate the targeted applicable fraction for each building. Total Site/Land (Number of Acres and Square Feet) ~ 1. 6 c Square Feet 72,SQO. Number of Units Sauare Footage Total All Buildings Total Commercial (non-residential/not common) Use Total Residential and Common Use* 16 24,800 16 24,800 Total Common Use Space Employee-Occupied Residential** 1 ...x.x- Caretaker _ Resident Manager _ Model _ Office 1.350 MHFA FORM L1HC-1 4 (1/98) c Owner-Occupied Residential Total Residential Use'" None 1 'i , ow Income/Rent Restricted Units L1HC Units HOME Units Project Based Assisted Units (rents approved by HUD?) Other Restricted Units Total Low Income Units 15 20,250 Yes No 15 20.2'i0 Applicable Fractions 100 (The calculation is Total Low Income Units divided by Total Residential units) 100 (Low Income Units sq. footage divided by Total Residential sq. footage) NOTE: Residential floor area includes facilities reasonably required by a project that are functionally related and subordinate to residential rental units including manager, caretaker, model unit and office. Indicate number of units dedicated to each use. Units for resident managers or maintenance personnel and common space are not classified as residential rental units and are not included. in either the numerator or denominator of the applicable fraction on page 10. .9:':" MONTHLY,'UTILlTY~;ALLOWANCE;;CALCULA TIONS i,; . "'t.:' ,,;" .,,;..' .,c"::",::.-,.;,.:.:.,, - . ....... ,C .. " .... ~nter Monthly Allowances by Type of Utility Utilities Paid By : Bedroom Size . .. .-.- Utilities (Gas, Electric, Oil) (Check One) O-BR 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR _-SR 1eating D Owner EJ Tenant 24 .... Air Conditioning optional D Owner D Tenant Cooking D Owner EJ Tenant 5 Lighting D Owner EJ Tenant 27 Hot Water D Owner El Tenant 12 Water ~ Owner D Tenant , Sewer El Owner D Tenant Trash ~ Owner D Tenant Total Monthlv Utilitv Allowance Paid bv Tenant: 68 Source of Utilitv Allowance Calculation (IRS Notice 94-60, Issued 6/94) Public Housing Authority x Utility Company Other (Specify) Effective Date of Source Information 4-1-97 MHFA FORM L1HC-1 5 (1/98 ~1 o. PROJECT INCOME INFORMATION list the estimated monthly income for the units Lo' Income Units Only Total Number of Low Income Units: 16 Mandatory Cha r es % of Median Income 5 5 11 ,552 Total Monthly Contract Rent: Other Income Source: (list}... Number of subsidized units Source and form of subsidy 16 (e.g. tax exempt bonds, Section 8, etc.) Market Rate Units 0 n Iy Total Number of Market Rate Units: Bedroom No. of Contract Mandatory Utility Gross Unit % of Median Tvpe Units Rent Charqes Allowance Rent Ty p e." Income i.- , 5 5 To..... Monthly Contract Rent: Other Income Source: (list)... Parking Income # of Covered Parking Spaces # of Surface Parking Spaces Additional Information: 16 ?R Charge 5 Charge 5 Less Vacancy and Collection Loss: 7 C/c (5 808 TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME: s 10.741 What is the estimated annual percentage increase in annual income: 3 % TOTAL ANNUAL TENANT PAID RENT FOR ALL UNITS 5 138,624 TOTAL ANNUAL MISCELLANEOUS RESIDENTIAL INCOME 5 2.; 500 (including parking/garages) TOTAL ANNUAL POTENTIAL GROSS INCOME FROM ALL 141,124 RESIDENTIAL SOURCES 5 NOTE: lIHC, HOME, Market, Employee Owned (EO), Owner Occupied (00), Project Based Assistance (PBA). NOT~: If there is a separate charge for tenant facilities, parking, clubhouse, swimming pool, etc., do not include construction cost In eligible basis. MHFA FORM lIHC-1 6 (1/98) 111,.;(CONSTRUCTION:';FINANC!NG C'''', , ; ,. "' .......,." -.. . .", ",' -.',." ",..,,__.' . ,n ,..-".:, ".....:. ..\,',\ List all preliminary and enforceable (firm) financing commitments, including grants (tax credit syndication information to be listed in Section 16) and provide copies of same. If the applicant plans to finance part or all of the project out of its own 'esources, the applicant must prove to MHFA's satisfaction that such resources are available and committed solely for this purpose. If a mortgage broker is involved in arranging financing from another source, so indicate. Any owner equity contributions or deferred fees should also be listed below if the funds will provide a source of financing. Indicate with an asterisk (*) enforceable financing commitments. Name of lender Type of Funds Amount of Interest Amortization Commitment or Other Source (see table below) Funds Rate Period Term Date Glaser Financial Private $775',000 7.75% 40 40 N/A Eloigne Company Owner Equity $897,-000' n/a n/a n/a 111.2 '~'rPE R MAN E NTt:::F.! N AN C.! N G }':j'. ;"':;'}si),;,,,';iY:!'f';}i':>::;":;(l>:;",?:-': ,;'." ',' >. \,L.<,/"-:)~;;::;+;;;~:;Jj"{di:;:'r;~~!: O:,;;{:fWg;'.::::;t'\ 1.~laser Financial Private __~7 7 5 ...gOO 7.75% $63.000 Term 40 Commitment Date n/a Name of lender or Other Source Type of Funds (see table below) Amount of Funds Interest Rate Annual Debt Service 2. 3. 4. Subtotal $-Z!5,000 $ 63,000 Net Proceeds Historic Tax Credit $ Net Proceeds low income Tax Credit $ 897.000 Total Residential Permanent Financing Funds $ 1,672,000 TOT Al COST $ 1,672,000 Type of Funds Bond Financing NonQual/NonRecourse CDBG Owner Equity Conventional Private Federal State Government HOME Other local Government Tax Exempt Bond Financing For All Permanent loans as identified above: Payment Frequency Year Amortization Begins Contact name and ohone number 1. Interest monthly stabilization-12 months Ken Dayton--Glaser Financial (612)603-5056 2. 3. 4. MHFA FORM L1HC-1 7 (1/98) PROJECT;COSTS:~:{MUST.,:BE"FJLLED.JN:;':'<.' ...............;', ... ..,<:,.....:;'.~~~.:..-:.'?>:.'.~-,:::.,(: - EliQible Basis bV Credit Type 30% PV 70% PV EliQible Basis EIiQible Basis 13. Itemized Cost .... }, ~jzN[},~f1t(?;}! Actual Cost of All Units 110,000 '.. .. NA NA . .... .,>;.....<c,;.c.... > ':\..\ '.;; ":oJ?"'/' 10,000 .f: .c'" "...;:".,:.0; 10,000 50,000 40 000 40,000 35.000 8 000 40 000 6,000 1,500 7.500 c; nnn 5,000 71,000 8 10.000 ?~i~~;~;~ '.'0 '>c 955,000 50,000 40.000 40,000 35,000 '., 1,120,000 ~~~:~{?;'i ~ 45 000 15,000 7.000 ......, 8.000 75,000 ~'--:::-';:iC\~~: :>,uuu 40.000 b,UUU 1,500 7,500 5 000 5,000 71,00U Tenant facilities, parking, garages, club house, swimming pool, storage lockers, etc., included in basis. If there is a separate charge for these structures, no not include construction cost in eligible basis. + Intermediary Cost MHFA FORM L1HC-1 (1/98) , I Eliaible Basis bv Credit Type Actual Cost of All 30% PV 70% PV Itemized Cost Units EIi~ible Basis Eliaible Basis "'i"';' " /" ';" ,'i' ,"',' '.' " ~"""" ,'" ":,,:,~.,," >,," ',::';e' ,",C, ,""'" , y':U::C", PERMANENTFINi~~ING ::,~ti's~~+:>!:.,.:,.,:,::.,;).;},:,;:q,/;i;"'''-;;_:; ""';":',:-,':':.:, C "";':'i/5'::-,tC,' (,' ;,' t'"",''';;-::'::,;; ':' Bond Premium+ Credit Report+ Discount Points+ Oriaination Fees+ 6 000 NA NA Credit Enhancement+ NA NA Title and Recordina+ 7.500 7.000 Leqal Fees+ ' c: nM 1 'l - 000 Prepaid MIP+ Other (Specify) SUBTOTAL 28,000 22,000 I~aET:;~,1(;'o~t~g3;;:;:t~;z?Jf[1$~~f~~~;it~;i~~' ~~!~~l~tT~j '1.'" Feasibilitv Studv/Appraisal+ Market Studv+ 2,000 2,000 Environmental Studv+ 1 500 1,500 Tax Credit Fees+ 5,000 N/A N/A Compliance Fees+ Rent-up+ 10 000 N I A Appraisal + 4.500 4,500 Cost Certification+ 'l ,000 5 000 Other (Soecify) SUB TOT A L 28 000 13 .000 ~Y~:m6kfl'6iJ;~!26~~T's:~1~~1{f{,tJ; Oraanization Costs+ , N/A N/A Bridqe Loan+ N/A N/A Tax Opinion+ 15,000 N/A N/A Other (Specifv) SUBTOTAL 'i'titgv~S26~'~'~t~V)~~~~~J:~~~~l:;\:~I~~~~ Developer Overhead+ 82.500 82,500 Developer Profit+ 82.500 82,500 Tax Opinion Consultant Fees+ 30 000 30,000 Other (Specify) SUBTOTAL 195,000 195,000 fe;~'6U~&T:,hFii~'S'~Ff~g;$,:\t~!{tff;1~,~tWf~$t~<f~~~J~~~/,'" ~ .k.,,,,,,,',,i,' ~f~t~:i,.tji;'~7;';1,;}~~ Rent-Uo Reserves 10 000 N/A N/A Operatina Reserves 111 MI1 N/A N/A Replacement Reserves I Escrows Other (Specify) SUBTOTAL 2U,UUU I:<:pi':"~,::!>,:',;> ,:" 'ii,i" ,;": ,,"', ;';.:,' . ',;, y: C :,:"!t:2;if>;;\,4~:0:;tg;)ti~W;' ;:f<;-;~::,;:, ,"-:":' ,'", ;:.-'; ic', ,~ :/;;,' ,', ,.;:c, ;, .' I,IU I AL.'i, IIHL')'( T;:~~3;:'~~t;~g;'iP:'i;'i1'-n~;,:"},;V': ;'z';::,;')"" " y,' ',,"!,":'>'" ,':' TOT AL 1,672,000 I 1,5uo,000 +Intermediary Cost MHFA FORM L1HC-1 9 (1/98 30%PV Eligible Basis 70% PV Eligible Basis Total Basis 1,506,000 Less portion of federal grant used to finance qualifying development costs. List Grants N/a ( ) N/a ) ( ) ) ( ) ) ( ) ) 1.506 .000 010 n/a 010 1,506,000 010 100 % 1,506,000 010 9 % 135 .540 88,126 47,414 by the housing credit agency, at each Less amount of nonqualified nonrecourse financing Less nonqualifying units of higher quality Less nonqualifying excess portion of higher quality units Less Historic Tax Credit (Residential Portion Only) TOTAL ELIGIBLE BASIS High Cost Adjustment Total Eligible Basis Adjusted for the High Cost, if applicable Multiplied by the Applicable Fraction TOTAL QUALIFIED BASIS Multiplied by the Applicable Percentage AMOUNT OF TAX CREDIT REQUESTED Less credit amount previously allocated TOTAL AMOUNT OF TAX CREDIT REQUESTED The actual amount of credit for the project is determined evaluation stage. If the project is eligible for Historic Tax Credit include a complete breakdown of the determination of eligible basis for the Historic Credit with the application. If the Project's basis has been adjusted because it is in a high cost or qualified census tract, the actual deduction for the item(s) mustbe adjusted by multiplying the amount by 130%. This does not apply to Historic Tax Credits. \SE NOTE: MHFA FORM L1HC-1 10 (1/98) ./ 114. ANNUAL PROJECT EXPENSES A. Annual operating Expenses (Estimated as of the end of the first full year of operation.). All residential expenses must be broken out by line item. Category totals only will not be accepted. .dministration Accounting Advertising Legal Leased Equip Management Fees Management Salaries + PR Taxes Model Apartment Office Supply/Postage Telephone Other (specify) SUB-TOTAL ADMINISTRATION COST ODe rating ExDenses Fuel (HeatMIater) Electrical Water & Sewer Gas Trash/Garbage Security Cable Other (specify) SUB-TOTAL OPERATING COST Maintenance Expenses Elevator Exterminating Grounds Repairs Maintenance Salaries Maintenance Supplies Insurance Other (specify) SUB-TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST SUB TOTAL ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL OPERATING EXPENSE Fixed ExDenses Real Estate Taxes (Per Unit $ 625 In Lieu of Taxes Other Tax Assessments Other TOTAL FIXED COST Reserves (Replacement, painting, Decorating $ 3,840 Per Unit $ 240 TOTAL ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL OPERATING EXPENSE (PER UNIT) S 1.. 1flS TOTAL ANNUAL COMMERCIAL OPERATING EXPENSES $ CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS: Annual Rent Increase Annual Expenses Increase Replacement Costs Increase MHFA FORM L1HC-1. 1 % 3 % % 3 11 12,500 $ $ 40.000 - $ 10,000 53,840 $ 53,840 $ (1/98: 115~\;'ACQUISITION/REHABILlT A TION-,:::.- . "'~"-'" .' ~.'. :.:'. . ;. . .' . '. - ~ ':,' ,-' '.: . .::;.-....~.::~~.';_:... :",'.: .~ . :::J{_~-.:::: I Total Rehabilitation Expense $ A .- -age rehabilitation expense per low income unit $ J ted basis $ x 10% = $ R<::\Iabilitation expense must be the greater of $5,000 per low income unit or 10% of adjusted basis, 42(e)(3)(A) Minnesota statue 462.A.221, in order to qualify for qualify for rehabilitation credit. 1 . Rehabilitation Projects (Check all applicable) D Project will create new low income units through rehabilitation of units that have not been available for at least 1 year. D Project will preserve already existing low income units which are within 2 years of any permitted prepayment or equivalent loss of low income use restrictions AND will remain low income for the longer of the initial tax credit period or the length of the mortgage. D Project will preserve already existing low income units which show a significant need for repair in order to achieve or maintain habitability. Number of buildings to be rehabilitated: Total number of units to be rehabilitated NOT E: ACQUISITION CREDIT WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED FOR PROJECTS MEETING ONE OF THE ABOVE-LISTED REHABILITATION CATEGORIES. 2. Developments Involving Acquisition Credit (Check all applicable) D Buildings acquired or will be acquired from unrelated party D Buildings acquired or Y'i11 be acquired from related party D Buyer's basis will be determined referencing seller's basis D buyer's basis will not be determined referencing seller's basis 3. Existing Subsidies Involving Acquisition (Check all applicable) D 221 (d) (3) Below Market Interest Rate. D Section 236 D Section 8 D FmHA 515 D Other 4. The total number of buildings to be acquired with this project is 5. Number of buildings currently under control is 6. Actual or projected acquisition date: 7. Date project was last placed in service: 8. Date of last substantial improvements: 9. If less than 10 years since last placed in service, is the project eligible for a waiver from the Secretary of U.S. Department of Treasury? o Yes. Date request submitted: Actual/projected date of approval: Attach copy of approval of waiver to the application. o No MHFA FORM L1HC-1 12 (1/98) 10. Has rehabilitation work greater than 25% of the adjusted project basis been performed during the 10 years prior to its acquisition by the owner? o Yes. Dates: o No 11 Complete the following: Address of Buildings Placed in Service Date by Actual/Proposed Date of Number of Years Between the Previous Owner Acquisition by Applicant Placed in Service and Acquisition If more space is needed, please provide on a separate sheet of paper. 12. Are any of the buildings owner-occupied single family dwellings? DYes o No 13. Were/are any of the buildings: a. Purchased from a decedent's estate? DYes o No b. Purchased from a nonprofit organization? DYes o No c. Purchased from a governmental entity? DYes o No d. Income Tax Exempt? o Yes Describe: o No e. Purchased as a result of a foreclosure? DYes o No f. From RTC/defaulting trust? DYes o No g. Acquired through gift/non-purchase? DYes o No . MHFA FORM L1HC-1 13 (1/98) 116~:TAX-!:/CREDIT':SYNDICATION, ',' " . '",. .'~. , .; '. ,,- . " ;::{":":':< .,"'~'. I Tax Credit Syndication (Provide as much information as is available at time of application.) N r of Annual Pay-In Periods 1 First,Pay.in Year 1999 Interest Rate Equity Factor Yes Estimated Proceeds: $ No xxx Does this project qualify for Historic Rehabilitation Credits? If yes, what is the credit amount? $ Will the Tax Credits be offered to investors? Yes xxx No 1 . If no, attach a description explaining how the tax benefits will be used and how that will benefit the project. 2. If yes, answer each of the following: Type of offering: Type of Investor: Public Individuals Private Corporations Eloigne L1HC Syndication costs will be evaluated along with other project costs. Please list all estimated or actual cost of syndication associated with the project. . Estimated Ten Year Gross Tax Credit Gross Syndication Proceeds. Funding Factor=Gross Syndication Proceeds Ten Year Gross Tax Credits $ 1,335,400 $ '897.,000 $ 10,000 $ 4,000 $ 7,000 $ $ $ 22,500 $ $ 43,500 $ RQ7,OOO 67.2% Less: (included in development cost) Attorney Accountant Consultant(s) Broker(s) Bridge Loan & Interest Syndicator Other (specify) Total Costs (included) Net Syndication Proceeds Proposed Syndicators or Equity Sources: 1. Name Source Eloigne Company Address 414 Nicollet Mall City Minneapolis, State MN Zip Code 55401 Phone (612) 330-5521 MHFA FORM L1HC-1 14 (11gB) c 1':;17.~ ,', P R OJ E CThdSCH ED U LE "; ..~', /<:. _. ':""; ... . ~ .:~, ,", ~ '~' .~", :. ';.'~; ~.~.;. '... / ~/;~:~(-,~ ~t: .:"::~ .",:. -!- ". - n:. ~". -~ ":'. "'.~:,:. . . .". ~."" ':. ~ '~'." ".. . ~., . ,!. " ..... ,'-. ""-,' Activit A. SITE o tion/Contract Site Ac uisilion Zonin A roval Site Anal sis Jan 1998 Sep 1998 B. FINANCING 1. Construction Loan Loan A Iication Conditional Commitment Firm Commitment 2. Permanent Loan Loan A lication Conditional Commitment Firm Commitment 3. Other Loans & Grants T e and Source A Iication Award 4. Other Loans & Grants T e and Source A Iication Award 5. Other Loans & Grants FeD 1999 Aug 1998 Feb 1999 T e and Source A Iication Award C. PLANS AND SPECIFICATION Mar 1999 D. CLOSING AND TRANSFER OF PROPERTY E. CONSTRUCTION START F. COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION G. LEASE-UP H. CREDIT PLACED IN SERVICE DATE Jul 1999 May 1999 Dee 1999 Feb 2000 Jan 2000 MHFA FORM L1HC-1 15 (1/98: I 18.':':STATEM ENT{AN D:.CERTI FICA TION ::..0 F~' APP LI CANT laWN ER)".;~>>'+':;:_;.'ic:.;'::;.;:..;;..: ".::;..:.1 Individually, or as the general partner(s} or officers of the applicant entity (hereinafter referred to as .Owner"), we are familiar with the provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and subsequent revisions with respect to the Low- Income Housing Tax Credit, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the applicant entity has complied, or II comply with all of the requirements which are prerequisite to issuance of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit ~y the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. We understand that the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program will be governed and controlled by rules and regulations issued by the United States Department of the Treasury. We also understand that we must comply with the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program Procedural Manual and Allocation Plan of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency concerning Low-Income Tax Credits. I (We) hereby make application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for allocation of housing tax credits. The undersigned hereby acknowledges that the making of an allocation by the Minnesota Housing F.inance Agency does not warrant that the project is deemed qualified to receive such allocation. I 0Ne} agree that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency or any of its directors, officers, employees, and agents will not be held responsible or liable for any representations made to the undersigned or its investors relating to the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program; therefore, I 0Ne) assume the risk of all damages, losses, costs, and expenses related thereto and agree to indemnify and save harmless Minnesota Housing Finance Agency or any of its directors, officers, employees, and agents against any and all claims, suits, losses, damages, costs, and expenses of any kind and of any nature that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may hereinafter suffer, incur, or pay arising out of its decision concerning the application for Low Income Housing Tax Credits or the use of the information concerning the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program. The undersigned hereby certifies that the information set forth in this application form, and in any attachments and exhibits in support thereof, is true, correct, and complete. I (We) further understand and agree that certain provisions of the Rule may change and as a result of said change may require the submission of additional documentation to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. I (We) also understand and agree that certain documentation initially submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may no longer be valid as a result of any amendments made to the Rule. . 0Ne) also understand and agree that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency has made no representations about the effect of the tax credit upon my (our) taxes or that of any other person connected with this project. The information requested on. this application and any attachments hereto are being collected to determine eligibility of the project under Section 42. An applicant which fails to complete all information requested will not be eligible for a reservation of Tax Credits. Information requested in this application is public data which is accessible to the public pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. I 0Ne) also agree that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may request additional information in order to evaluate this application. I 0Ne) hereby certify that the information contained in the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Low Income Housing Tax Credit Application Form is true and accurate. I (We) understand that any misrepresentations and/or fraudulent information contained within this application may result in the termination of tax credits by the Agency and potentially my (our) and related parties being barred from future program participation, and notification of such to the Internal Revenue Service: MHFA FORM L1HC-1 16 (1/98) c 115. STATEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF APPLICANT/OWNER (continued) -5~Cr,:n~ 4 6.5 iJe,,~-/c:s, :::Z:-.l"Z-C. SignatuJ.,of General Part';ljr ' by: -"~ _ 'L -fL ____ its: #c..6/~~ Print name of signatory, ~t?r~~ E"'. ~A~r,n~ ./ ",k~~ /9'. /~7"r Date STATE OF MINNESOTA} 55 COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /9 day of ....,6/!~try ,1922-, by ~~-:re E: ...5A&.r~ , the ~~,-5/o/~-" )i'ame) (title) ofc--:5kn'nt/J ..43~~/dk~-~" a ~/?/1e:sC?4 ~,?~r~~ uJ(f~~ JLt{AlLiL-- (Name of corporation) /~~:';~i.~,":,,-~_\ 1_ ., . .. " _ fit! ..l.'A..W' . _ ~ ~ ::r\:~ ! ~NSEN \~n"} .r.:JI''''~ r ,:L. '. I~.I~NESOTA ~.... .., ."...... '. "' 31 2000 .' Y"- Notary Public Signature of Nonprofit Partner by: its: Print name of signatory, Date STATE OF MINNESOTA} 55 COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by ,fue (name) day of ,19_, (title) of a (Name of corporation) Notary Public MHFA FORM lIHC-1 17 (1198: TH 3 AND COUNTY RD 66 SITE wi c I I ~ ~ c '-----------, I I I I I I I I I COUNTY RD. 72 I::i '" z ;; <I: " M :x: <I: ~ 208TH ST. I I I I I ~TH ST. : ,..J r--.J I I I I I ___, ~J ~~,... ___...I ~ r~r"~~ 2JOTH ST. C\.,o.!- ~ J I __,.,... I .".......... I ...... L____ '--- 2J3TH ST. .., I I I I '-, n ~ '---- ~---------------- r-- I I I I HVY. 50 CASTLE ROCK I. AKIN ELEMENTARY 2. FARl\lINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL 3. FARMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL 4. KINDERGARTEN CENTER I COMMUNITY ED. S. FARMINGTON ELEMENTARY 6. HOSPITAL I CLINIC 7. FIRE DEPT. 8. POLICE 9. POST OFFICE 10. LIBRARY I I. POOL 12. ARENA 13. !\tUN. LIQUOR STORE 14. MU~. LIQUOR STORE IS. HILL DEE I'ARK 16. UAKOTA ESTATES PARK 17. I'INE K]'I;OLL I'ARK 111. RA:\IBLIl\'G RIVER PARK 19. RA:\I8LIl\'G RIVER PARK 1. t) nfi:t c..r~- --------~ I I I I -, I '------.... 225TH STREET V./CSNl so A //' ~-~~~;;{;;FSA / I \~J ;'" I ;'" i III ~. ~ ;'" I ~ ~. I ~. I ;'" ~. I ;'" I / ~. I ' " I :\ / ' '(. I I I I I I I I I , '''''''' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ i i\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I I I J .' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l \ ''----- . b1.i >: ~ ~. ~ "'-'d.""" Z b1.i '" z !;l :;l i: ."" Q :i e:t' g ~ ~ 'll i: ~ 0: ~ w Q( u <( Q( w Q. '" iL tn t: lri .... z ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ t- t- ori Q( o zEf) )- Q( <( r: 5~ 1IlQ( 1-<( '" ~t ~ Q.IS) :) :: 9..J ;t u) ~g b ~ 0.... .... 0 in z Q I- 0.. o ~d lU J. ~ W ~ ~ Z ~ ~ W ~ W ~ -------..................... "" , \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I I I I I .J ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I III UJ ...J 0 z i 0 III 00 L z I- UJ~ iiZ Ci ...J t2 I- in ...J ~~ ~ Q. III >- <t ...J <t z .~ ...J >- :; z LI- ...J :; ::l )- N ...J Z ::: <t :; '" ~ Co I- Z ::l U " :r bI) g UX~ 0 l':: Q g: '" .... .. ,..., ell ~ bI) ~ ;;l S1 W Q ."" ::I:: i ~ 5 0 "" ~ 'iJ s;: ~ ~ .. " :r I- <{ z o i= <{ > w ....1'1 w~ (I/:~ <{~ w~ (I/:~ '" :g~ ..m . -. t:2 -h If; ~~~ ;...... . I : !;: t>I) ~ o !;: 0 ~.;;; i3 l: :::l ~ '", Q !i1 :c :i ~ z ~ -< .. ~d lCj I E ~ 'II ~ ~ til ~ Q Z ~ ~ til ~ til Q, ~~~ .:.1I'l~ ; gill taa !!~ w'l~ d; ~.. 0 ~ z w z L < IL 0 ::> &: bI) l- e IL iii --' Q l:: ~ <( lfI 0 "" .... u 0( IL :r u I>l) '" Z 3:0 <( 0 lfI &: :;j z 0( --' 0 I-lfI .... Q i: "<( z f;J =c z LO ::>0( ~ L --' 3: Ow ~ 3111 )- l... ~ z ILl- W <(L ~I- '1l Z l- s;: ~ i: - ~ 3:::> ~ O~ .. <01- -.\) ;. 0" i:: ~ Z ~ ~ w E=t w ~ -.\) z Q I- <( > UJ l1J? 1-' zi! O~ (k:4' ~ ~ .~~~i U ~~g cl: 1,1 0" !: '" ;1 Ii m~mm~ I~\~ II tliJl i [I ~~~ .:.~~ ';~ f,.. &{; j "~ wU ~IG ~H r------------- , , , , , , , , -:- - - - '- - - -- - - -- u ~ I- m Z ::l Hi ~8 <(...I , :IV ,--------. '; t .. Z ::l -i. I: I' I' I I I I I I I I I, I' r: I: I' I: I: I' I: I' I: I: I' I: I: --1-' , r - , I , I , ~l-- ,Ill ~~ :IV ~ , ill 10 1 'c .. Z ::l ~ , .. <l: C Z ::l ------- ---, , , , , I , , I I ., - _1- _ _ _ _ I ~--------- I I , I , I I , I , , I , r------------ 1- _J , , I , , , I , I , - - - - - - - - -. - - - -") , I , , I , , I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _. _ __ _ L I '" u " k ;; ~ :. '" I o~ :ll '" u 1: - 8 ~ '" 0 0- III III , , I , I ..-' . I I , , , ffi~ ~ ~~ ~ ~m ",1: ~ ~ " ~e ~ EIll "-- -, I I , I I I I ii k~ ~ 0 ~ )C o !:! III III .o~.c:; .0-,% r.::; bl) .. .: d l-- C r.::; ~ 1 ~ .... U bl) '" z Ii:: ::::l z " .... Q i: la ::t ~ ~ "" 'II " ~ z ~ ~ ~ " ~ Q Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ Ii ~~g ! gE I: " ~I ,. I' ;I -'j I I I I I I I ______..J -------------, I I I I I I _-, I f-- -I ,v-,et; ~:<: '.~ is till 11'~ w ~ ~. ~ I- Z ::l U ..... :I: LU ...J 10 in III LU U U <( u '" ~f- "'z ::l 10 '" f- z ::l ~g <{ ." ,,-'" 1 ll> ~2 <{ -" "-'" 10 '" . f- N Z ::l <( .. o' f- N - Z ::l ii . 8~ ~ .' 0'- UJ III ~Q <{o" ,,-'" " k. ~~~ a~~ 8 ~ 0 .. " - z 0" s~ ::i i Ii ~ \ 8;, ~. ,,:. z .' s; = ::i \JI:. ~8~ OOl : "8:' z . 2 :: Q~~ r: 8;, '" x ,,:. z-' 5= ::i r: 8;, ~x llj 5= ::i ~9 <{ ." ,,-'" ~g 0'" MV-,z::e .O-,"S !;: bJ) Q !;: '-6l .... bJ) '" ~ :;J ~,.., Q fi:I: r.. <il [J;, < ... ~ z z ~ Z g " z .~ '" < .. UJ ":l '" <{ " ~ <{ " UJ ":l ~ <{ " UJ ":l ~ <{ " .V-,eG ~ ~~~~ U ~~~ H c. 0" ~ :1 .. H d u ~ W ~ o Z ~ ~ W ~ W b1. LL LL u.; ;;;J . iii Ul U'l b~ ~ :il ;! .... ~,~..~.. UJ u: u: tL " . iii iii iii <{IL ~u) ~ ~ ~ " ~ ._-~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ u.lL, '" 01ll;82;8o z .,g ltl ..a ~ '" ",0 ~ ..: ~LL ~ ~ ~ ul IL iii '" ;l: .. II ~ ~",a; is J :; III ILIIl ~~ ~ llll!j ~;j <{ III U I- I- I- ~~~l- z ::l ~~~ ..~ is,: ta. jI~ !1.~ ~ ;; " . J ('4 co ~ Q I- j------ , , , I I I I , I , I I , , , I ~ .. <l: t z ::l [Q I- Z ::l -1, I: I' I: I: I' I: \ ' 1\ I: I' I: I: I' T: I: I' I: I: I' I: I' , I' I: I' I: I: -.1-1 " , $ " , .. [Q I:: z ::l " , .. <l: t z ::l !;: t>I) <: It. d ... Q ... ~ U '"' ."" t>JJ III Z ::l z 0: !;l i1 .... Q C :I: :i ~ ~ l. ~ ~ <;j [;r.. i: ~ .. <: Q .. Z ~ ~ ~Si~ Ii ~~~ I} -. t 5"" " ~i h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" u ii 8~ E 1 I<x 8 0 0", I< X 0 ~ ..- .. 10 10 N u. B~ I< .' OIT .. III , , I , I I I , I --1_______ --.--------...- I -~-----------------------~ I I I I I , I I , I I , , I I I , I I I I I : ' 1-- - - - -- --I ,__ __I I , I : I I I : I : I , I I - - - ____ __ - - - - - __ - __ - __I I I I I I __ _ __ __ ._ _ _ __ __ __ -t- - - _-0 - - I I I I I ~8 ~ tl~ ~ ~~ N U g~ I< 9 o .. III ~ ~ 'r ~~ ~ 1:10 --- --j I I I I I I I ---------1 I ~... : ~~ 1\ <(..1 I :tV I 1______-1 -. --I {-------.- I I , I I , I I I , , I -~--------~--------------- I N U 8~ I<'{' ~ir 10 ii . 8 ~ I< .x o ~ .. 10 J llJ-,lE ~",-,'~ ..0.,% ,~ f! Us ~ .: wl~ ~- ~ " . <{ ~ ~ t z ::l ~ , $ to ~ N !:: z ::l o. j::9 4." .... l Ii ~ \ - .~'., -._~...:. -_. --, o. i=9 4." .... Qo 1-- 4." 0.... Qo ~)( .... ~~:. z , ~ ; L '" " ~:. z' S;= :; 8;, '" " ~"' z -' s; = :; ~~"' z , ~ ~ ~J;j z~= CiO!~ 8. Ol~ ~"' z ' s;= :; 8;, "'" ~"' z -' s; = :; ~8:' z , Z ';.. oO!~ .Q-,Z;E -J ~o.:~%---------- l'.1 bI) o ~ '"' .... bI) '" l':: :;l ..., 0 E~ "" <\l t.!., ~ 4 ~ '" ~ 4 '" ~ g ~ 0 ~ ~ U ;, 0: ~ o I- " Z >: '" <: ... ~ W ~ Q Z ~ ~ ~ >.Vl . U ~~]~ '-Ea H c~ 0'" 'l; :1 ,. l~ ~~~ (~ J;.. fO !~~ <d i~ ~h \!l ~ '" ~ 4 '" .. ~ n: )- I- '" Z ~ <( ~ ...J j n.. _"'-,lit ----.-.---. lL u.: ..J .. <( . <11 <11 b~;il ~ I- .g III ~ W ~ ~ ~ l1J u.: u..: ~u.: iii iii ~1Ii ~ ~ " N N II!: 8 u.: u.: "- ~u:<I1I1i11i 0<11;80 N z ~ ~ co N cfl .g- II! -8- u.: u.: u.: ..Ju.: <11 <11 iii "- iii .g .g " I- III III !l:l .g .g z a ...J "-<11 ::> OL 10 ffi~ cfl ...J N <( 100 I- LW 0 ~IO I- <( 1O l- I- Z Z ::> ::> . ]:lOUSING TAX CREQiT APPLICATION Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Housing Tax Credit Program Multifamily Development 400 Sibley Street - Suite, ~OO St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1998 (651) 297-3294 MHFA USE ONLY: MHFA #: NOTE: Do not attempt to complete this application without reading the MHFA Tax Credit Procedural Manual, and Section 42 of Internal Revenue Code. An Incomplete Form HTC-1 will not be accepted end will be returned to the applicant/developer. .f!f{,,~~"-"-I",~~ "r--:~"'" ,- ."..-..-. . -, . - . ,..-.,......-;--...,.,..... -., -' "--." ;_x~~.J~}~~_.-::..~-'-"'-~, <4->.~~~~____ -~ --- - ~.--~~-~..~~...:..-~. - "'-~ ~oaEC1i.JNAMawtNDjA1)DRES~letIttH.llnfO);MitIO.IJjte~10Vit.__ '- , Stage of Application IX1 Initial Application! U Reservation Date Submitted: o Commitment! Carryover Allocation Name: Address: City: Farmington Family Housing County Rd 66 and Chippindale Farmington State: County: ' Zip Code: (Any changes in site location or loss of site control invalidates application). . Amount of Annual Credit Currently Requested . Amount Previously Allocated . Previous Source and Year Allocated · HTC No. Please check the appropriate set-aside (Nonprofits must sign page 17): o D Greater MN For-profit Metro FDr-prom o ~ Greater MN Non-profit Metro Non-profit o D 2-18-99 o Placed in Service Minnesota uaKota 55024 $ 242,426 1$ 0 , , Rural Development! Small project Tax Exempt Bond Are you also Applying for any of the following funds for this development at this time? MHFA Single Family Homes RFP Yes x No MHFA Multifamily Division RFP X Yes No Metropolitan Housing Opportunity Program (MHOP) Yes X No or Other Assistance form the Hollman vs. Cisneros Settlement Decree (HOLLMAN) Yes The Hollman Units will be: o o Leased to the Local Housing Authority Sold to the Local Housing Authority or MHFAFORM HTC-1 x No (12/98) , ,- .~~IlQ5ECJ.~NAM~"ND:!~SjflContinuedh..._~\~~1 Have you previously applied for any of the following funds for this development: If funded. Indicate' YBr Amount Awarded . :;:r'--:::-'::.i~ =" ""cF:-:~ I !llTI..:rr'lf c-, ,,;.\,> .~ 7 i :.hl \, r'l ~T::r"'l ~ i :3'~ r. ~ i'. . . :-: - - -. --.- ... : :~ .. 1.._a:_~,~_"","~IU.~~~J'...._, .~",:;..-n~_ ......~~~ ~~~~~ .. -~- - ~-~._.,......,-....., ~ MHFA Single Family Homes RFP MHFA Multifamily Division RFP o Fall 98 MHOP or other Hollman Funds The Hollman Units will be: o D Leased to the Local Housing Authority Sold to the Local Housing Authority or o D o New Construction without Federal Subsidies AcquisitionlRehabilitation without Federal Subsidies New Construction with Federal Subsidies AcquisitionlRehabilitation with Federal Subsidies D D AcquisitionlRehabilitation with 10 year waiver Is this project using RHO funds? Is this project using HUD Section 8 rental assistance? oroject based or Yes X Yes X tenant certificates and vouchers No No Is this project using HOME funding? Yes X No Are any of the above to be treated as "Federal Funds"? Yes X No The Owner Irrevocably elects one of the minimum .et..side requirements (check one only) 20% of the units serving households at 50% of the area median x 40% of the units serving households at 60% of the area median Resolution Trust Corporation Funding In this Project? Yes X No MHFA FORM HTC-1 2 . . (12/98) (i!liilROUEC.INF.QRM~ION__~~~1 . Tenn of the Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants: This project will remain low-income with the occupancy described for >4f5< or 30 years. (CIRCLE ONE) Total Low-income Rent Targeting: . The rent restrictions as stated below must be consistent with rents indicated in Section 10, page 6. as well as with all deeper rent structuring (bold areas below) for which selection points are requested and awarded on the 8elf-scorlng worksheet (Exhibit F, Sec. 15, Item 2). _(I) of the tax credit units wiD have rents affordable to households at ~ AMI for the full tenn of the recorded Declaration.. Of these units, _(') units will also have additional rent restrictions requiring rents affordable to households at 50% AMI for a minimum of 5 years following the placed In aervlce date. ~(#) of the tax credit units will have rents affordable to households at ~ AMI for the full tenn of the recorded Declaration.. Of these units, 12.-(') units will alIa have additional rent restrictions requiring rents affordable to households at 50% AMI for a minimum of 5 years following the placed In service date. ~(#) of the tax credit units will have rents affordable to households at 40% AMI (maximum per selection point condition) for the full tenn of the recorded Declaration. Of these units, L(I) units will also have additional rent restrictions requiring rents affordable to households at 30% AMI for a minimum of 5 years following the placed In service date. _(I) of the tax credit units will have rents affordable to households at _% AMI. Single Family D D Detached Single Family Elevator Building D Detached Two Family CHOOSE ONE: o Slab on Grade D Crawl Space D Partial Basement D Full Basement Are there Accessory Buildings & Area? Is there a Separate Fee Charged? Yes No x Yes No x Number of Garages! Parking Spaces 28/42 Number of Storage Lockers o Club House, Swimming Pool. Other? No Gross Floor Area 44,456 of all Buildings, Square including common areas: Feet Non-Residential Floor Area: Square Feet , MHFA FORM HTC-1 3 (12/98) _RO;'I!CIiIIN&ORDnoN1ltlO'iiilnue I Targeting of Units (Indicate type and number of units) o Elderly, number of units: 0 Family, number of units: 28 D Handicapped, number of units: D SRO, number of units: D Homeless, number of units: D HIVlAIDS Housing, number of units: o Other, number of units: . t'. Census Tract Number Is this project located in a State Senate District 37 A Congressional District 6 Is site part of an organjzed plan? X documentation. Economic Development Region ifi ;,. Quallfled Census Tract or State House District 37 A Difficult Development Area? EVHI Region Region Yes No If yes explain and provide ffK~ ~ ~.:::":"~_,'.~',._~~~:.c-'::"~'.'.~_... . ~~=-."",'~.'::'~~~'~~-:.'__ .: Site Control (e.g. ownership, option, purchase contract, or long-t~ lease) Is a requirement for eligibility for a tax credit reservation. Is site currently under control? Yes No Control Is In the form of (Include documentation): Deed Option Lease Other (specify) Letter of Intent to Purchase Agree . expiration date of contract or option 5/99 Renewable? El D MonthIYear Yes No Name of Seller: Farmington Severson Limited Partnership Address: 7808 Creekridge Circle #310 City: BloominQton StatelZlp Code: 55439 Phone Number: 941-7805 Does site require annexation actions? Yes X No Is site properly zoned? Yes X No If y.., Include third party documentation If no, is site currently in the process of rezoning? X Yes No The site is cuirentlv zoned aQ and is quided properly for the use desired in this aoolication When is zoning issue scheduled to be resolved (month and year)? next 2 months . MHFA FORM HTC-1 4 (12/98) . . , ~RMA1fJ,O""'Ale1NGfAD6RES~~~1 The applicant must be a legal entity (e.g. partnership, corporation etc.) or individual. x Applicant is current owner and will retain ownership. Applicant is the Project Developer and will be part of the final ownership entity Applicant is the Project Developer and will not be part of the final ownership entity. (Complete Sec.7.E.) Farmington Family Housing Limited Partnership 7700 Equitable Drive Suite 203 Eden Prairie Name(s): Address: City: State: Minnesota Zip Code: 55344 Contact Person: Jim Deanovic Telephone: 386-4089 Fax: 941-3264 ~~'61!NERSaINl)l~"'RMgJ,(!I"'~-8iilb~ (Please note: The MHFA reserves tax credits to the partnership ancl General Partners. Reservations. are not transferable. Any change in General Partner status requires MHFA approval. The Partnership and the General Partner(s) should not have the same Federal Tax 1.0 Numbers.) Name: FarminQton Family Housing Limited Partnership Fed. Tax 10 No.: To be applied for % Ownership Fed. Tax 10 No. TBD % To be applied for % % The members of the LLC will be James Deanovic and Minnesota Attainable Housing Corp. a 501 (c)(3) organization Type of Sponsor General Partnership. Umited Partnership. Limited Uability Co. Corporation. Individual Nonprofit Corporation" (CHDO) Local Govemment Housing Authority non-promther (specify) Name of General Partner(s) Farmington Familv HousinQ, LLC Telephone 386-4089 Required materials: articles of incorporation, by-laws, partnership agreement and other relevant information regarding legal status U Required materials: articles of incorporation, IRS letter of 501 (c)3 or 501 (c) 4 status. nonprofit Certificate of Incorporation and Certificate of Good Standing (Sec'y of State), nonprofit set-aside eligibility questionnaire description of material participation in ownership and management B. Legal Status of Sponsor Incorporated C. ~nprofit Status of Sponsor 501 (c)(3) D. Capacity of Applicant Developer Contractor Registered 501 (a) Exemption 501 (c)(4) General Partner Other (Specify) Owner x E. If the Applicant is the Project Developer. who wit not retain ownership, briefly descriI:le the planned process and timing tor disposition of this project. MHFA FORM HTC-1 5 (12/98) ~M~aD.IP.RQJE:_eJfl!JCABIEIibIAQtlONIDSE8MI"'A1l0N"~1 This .ectlon is to be completed for the project at initial application and carryover. At placed-In- . .ervlce, attach a Building Map (HTC 28) to the 8609 WorkahHt (HTC 4) to calculate the applicable fraction for each building. Total site Acreage 3.7-4.0 Density Number of Units/Acre LESS THAN 8/ACRE Total Residential Units In All Buildings Total Commercial Use Total Common Use Space _ FT Caretaker _ FT Res. Manager _ Model _ OffICe _ Hollman . of Units 28 Sauare Footage 44,456 (Indicate the number of units dedicated to each use.) Note: Common use space includes facilities reasonably required by a project that are functionally related and subordinate to residential units including community room, laundry room, hallways, and units for full time manager, full time caretaker, model and office. Please indicate how many units are dedicated to each use. Also, units receiving assistance under the Hollman Settlement which 818 owned by the HRA should be listed under Common Use Space. Hollman units owned by the owner should be listed under "Other Restricted Units". Owner -OCCupied ReSidential , of Units Square Footage . TOTAL RENTAL UNITS 28 44,456 Low IncomeJRent Restricted Units HTC Units HOME Units Project-base Assisted Units Rents approved by HUD? V/N Other restricted units TOTAL LOW INCOME UNITS 28 44,456 Market Rate Units 0 0 APPLICABLE FRACTION 100 % 100 % To calculate the applicable fraction, divide the Total Low Income Units by the Total Rental Units. Do the same calculation using the square footage. Use the lesser of the unit fraction or square foot fraction when calculating qualified. basis 0 n page 12 of this application. Calculation of the actual credit amount and compliance monitoring is done on a building-by-building basis and wiD be based on the targeted applicable fraction set forth on the Building Map at placed-In-service. . .. MHFA FORM HTC-1 6 (12198) r- .. .\;~ .' . by . Type of Utility Utilities Paid By : Utilities (G8S, Electric. 011) (Check One) o-BR Heating 0 Owner lKJ Tenant Gas Forced Air Air Conditioning 0 Owner ~ Tenant Elec Central Cooking 0 Owner EI Tenant Elec Lighting 0 Owner l:J Tenant Elec Hot Water D Owner ~ Tenant Gas Water [] Owner D Tenant Sewer El Owner 0 Tenant Trash EI Owner 0 Tenant Allowance Paid b Tenant: 62 79 Source of Utllltv Allowance Calculation (IRS Notice 94-60, Issued 6194) . Public Housing Authority X Utility Company Other (Specify) Effective Date of Source Information 2-99 ~.ROttE~NCOMEllNfiQRMATJD List the estimated monthly income for the units Low Income Units Only Total Number of Low Income Units: 28 Total Monthly Contract Rent: Other Income Source: (List)..... Number of subsidized units Source and form of subsidy Unit T eU % of Median Income 40 50 40 50 $ 218.352 $ (e.g. tax exempt bonds, Section 8. etc.) , MHFA FORM HTC-1 7 (12/98) T.-::'-T...."JT-=-T ~ '1IH.ar"llT~" 'm~.."T;TTu:tIllr."DT:v~r:.t':~~T- T"'- ,~--...........,...~~ lTa1;.:?~~~,,,Ll~.~:._}~~~~1.____.______.._-.w.._~_:__L~~ Market Rate Units Only Total Number of Market Rate UnitS: 0 . Bedroom No. of Contract Mandatory Utility Gro.. Unit % of Median Tv.,e Units Rent Chara.. Allowance Rent TVD.** Income Total Monthly Contract Rent:" Other Income Source: (List)*- Parking Income # of Covered Parking Spaces # of Surface Parking Spaces Additional Information: $ 218,352 $ Charge S Charge $ Less Vacancy and Collection Loss: TnTAl MONTHLY INCOME: % ($ S What is the estimated annual percentage increase in annual income: 2 % TOTAl GROSS ANNUAl TENANT PAID RENT FOR ALL UNITS TOTAL GROSS ANNUAL MISCELLANEOUS RESIDENTIAL INCOME (including parking/garages) TOTAl ANNUAL POTENTIAL GROSS INCOME FROM ALL RESIDENTIAL SOURCES $ $ . $218,352 ... NOTE: HTC, HOME, Mari<et, Employee Occupied (EO), Owner Occupied (00), project Based Assistance (PBA), Holman. NOTE: If there is a separate charge for tenant facilities, parking, clubhouse, swimming pool, etc., do not include construction cost in eligible basis. . MHFA FORM HTC.1 8 (12198) 1!Id.~ONs:rRUCTION~N1d~CING__~~~~<<~1 ..... Ust all preliminary and enforceable (firm) financing commitments, including grants (tax credit syndication information to be . listed in Section 16) and provide copies of same. If the applicant plans to finance part or all of the project out of its own resources, the applicant must prove to MHFA's satisfaction that such resources are available and committed solely for this purpose. If a mortgage broker is involved in arranging financing. from another. source, so indicate. Any owner equity contributions or deferred fees should also be listed below if the funds will provide a source of financing. Indicate with an asterisk (*) enforceable financing commitments. Amount of Funds 814,700 538,168 Interest Rate 7.25 Amortization Period Term 11 month Commitment Date Name of lender or Other Source Type of Funds (see table below) HUD RFP Pre approved [ti[llij ~~~~~=:~~~~~=:~~~;,~ '~~~=_~~~~_~ . ~~. ~-~~~ :~~t ~v_ _~~=_-] Name of Lender or Other Source Type of Funds Amount of Interest Annual Debt Commitment (see table below) Funds Rate Service Term Date Non Recourse 814,700~- . 7.25 69,929 40 Pre Approved 538,168 1. HUD 2. MHFA RFP 3. .4. Subtotal $ 1,352,868 $ 69.929 Net Proceeds Historic Tax Credit $ Total Residential Permanent Financing Funds TOTAL COST $ $ TVDe of Funds Bond Financing NonQuaVNonRecourse CDBG OWner Equity Conventional Private Federal State Government HOME Other Local Government Tax Exempt Bond Financing ~~,gt ::'iwGads Tax Cradit $ 1.696,988 For All Permanent loans as identified above: Payment FreQ~ency 1. Monthly Year Amortization Beoins Contact name and Dhone number 99 Glaser Fiinancial Dave Williams 603-5055 2. 3. 4. I MHFA FORM HTG-1 9 (12/98) Fee MHFA FORM HTC-1 27 550 10000 2444.10 4 073.50 4073.5 5000 15 000 2000 2500 92 641. 10 _.._-_._-----_._----_.__.-..._~_._--_.-._---_. -.., ".. ... 27 550 10 000 1 222.05 4073.50 2036.75 5000 11 250 2000 1250 84382.25 .. (12198) . ._----_.._-_..~_. ...~-_._,-------_.._- --.. . 10 000 NA NA NA NA 5000 5000 ~f~~=~LL:~~=-~-~~~:~~:.=_:-'~.~:~:~~" -."~ = . ~~.. '. . - - . ..... _~:,~~-===Z-, _.~~'.'~ -~~, ~ 1 0,000 . 10 000 16 920 N/A N/A r: ~~-: '~"""'-V~"':j"'1t r-~-^-"" ,r~ "'t,.,.. ..-l.....--".~--... ~~ ~...... .~ ~ ~1 ~ ~. - ~-_.~~'~~~~~~~~~~_~~~.~ _ h_~_<~.~~- .~~.. " ~~~-~~.j 0000 12 500 . 7500 230 000 230 000 37500 37 500 . .. ~'~0~~~~~~~.~=-~~_.~~~~-'~~-,-..~ ~-~:.::j 267 500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N1A N/A N/A N/A , Tenant facilities, offices, parking, garages, club house, swimming pool, storage lockers. etc.. There _Is _is not (check one) a separate charge for use of these facilities. It there is a separate charge, the associated costs are not included in eligible basis. MHFA FORM HTC-1 \,^~~O('l'Nl~O-<"1 CO~~ :: \.t 1 L \ 3 \ L ::= 7.,. 'Z-- it) 11 ,?C "-\ ct..~ '5 v I I (12/98) + Intennediary Cost _~dOntlnuidJ_."li'li~~1 3QOkPV Eligible Basis 70% PV Eligible Basis . Total Basls 2,693,632.25 Less portion of federal grant used to finance qualifying development costs. List Grants ) ( ) ) ) ) ( ) ) ( ) ) ( \ 2.693.632.25 % % % % 2,693,632.95 % 9 % 242,426 . 242.426 Less amount of nonqualified nonrecourse financing Less nonqualifying units of higher quality Less nonqualifying excess portion of higher quality units Less Historic Tax Credit (Residential Portion Only) TOTAL ELIGIBLE BASIS High Cost Adjustment Total Eligible Basis Adjusted for the High Cost, If applicable Multiplied by the Applicable Fraction TOTAL QUALIFIED BASIS Multiplied by the Applicable Percentage AMOUNT OF TAX CREDIT REQUESTED Less credit amount previously allocated TOTAL AMOUNT OF TAX CREDIT REQUESTED PLEASE NOTE: The actual amount of credit for the project is detennined by the housing credit agency, at each evaluation stage. If the project is eligible for Historic Tax Credit include a complete breakdown of the detennination of eligible basis for the Historic Credit with the application. If the Project's basis has been adjusted because it is in a high cost or qualified census . tract, the actual deduction for the Item(s) must be adjusted by multiplying the amount by 130%. This does not apply to Historic Tax Credits. . MHFA FORM HTC-1 12 (12/98) r~idfARflUA1._flOiJEanlEXp..ENS~_J:;~1t:1 A. Annual operating Expenses (Estimated as of the end of the first full year of operation.). All residential expenses must be broken out by line item. Category totals only will not be accepted. . Administration Accounting $ 4,500 Advertising 1~00 Legal 7 0 Leased Equip 16,000 Management Fees Management Salaries + PR Taxes 13,350 Model Apartment 750 Office Supply/Postage Telephone 10500 Other (specify) 5 0 SUB- TOTAL ADMINISTRATION COST $ 39.050 Operatino Exoenses Fuel (Heat/Water) $ 1,900 Electrical Water & Sewer 9 bBOO Gas 6 0 Trash/Garbage 3,950 Security Cable Other (specify) 1,100 17,350 SUB- TOTAL OPERATING COST $ Maintenance E](DenSeS Elevator $ Exterminating BOO . Grounds 6,UUU Repairs 1300 maii"ll",nance Salaries 13165 Maintenance Supplies 3, 00 Insurance 6~000 Other (specify) 9 0 SUB-TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST $ 38.415 SUB TOTAL ANNUAL.. RESIDENTIAL:<OPERATI~G::~X.IlI~N~~.';~:':;2>:';~.'~~:'~.L~~;tt:~~j~~;~$"~94:815)7;\"';~;,;;.:~~"<~~,<?"" . Fixed Exoenses Real Estate Taxes (Per Unit $ In Lieu ofTaxes Other Tax Assessments Other TOTAL AXED COST $ 24.000 $ 24,000 Reserves (Replacement, painting, Decorating $10.920 Per Unit $ TOTAL ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL OPERATING EXPENSE (PER UNIT) $ 4633. TOTAL ANNUAL COMMERCIAL OPERATING EXPENSES $ 129.735 $ CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS: Annual Rent Increase Annual Expenses Increase Replacement Costs Increase 2 3 % % % , MHFA FORM HTC-1 13 (12/98) --r;;\.- '~~ r:---:-~--~~-7-~:':'-~ First Pay-in Vear . Tex Credit Syndication (Provide as much Information as is available at time of application.) Number of Annual Pay-In Periods Int.,'~t Rl!l1e Equity Factor Does this project qualify for Historic Rehabilitation Credits? If yes, what is the credit amount? $ Ves Estimated Proceeds: $ No Wdl the TaX Credits be offered to Investors? Ves X No 1. If no, attach a description explaining how the tax benefits will be used and how that will benefit the project. 2. "yes, answer each of the following: Type of offering: Type of Investor: Public Individuals Private Corporations Paramount l::lolnge or ILJ~ HTC Syndication costs will be evaluated along with other project costs. Please list all estimated or actual cost of syndication associated with the project. Estimated Ten Vear Gross Tax Credit Gross Syndication Proceeds- Less: $ $ Attorney Accountant Consultant(s) Broker(s) Bridge Loan & Interest Syndicator Other (specify) Total Costs $ 5.000 $ $ $ $ $ bU,UUO $ $ 55,000 $ . Net Syndication Proceeds Funding Factor::Gross Syndication Proceeds Ten Vear Gross Tex Credits 7 % In reality the factor today for credits is .816 and can get in the high 70s therefore 9% and 7 are close. Proposed Syndicators or Equity Sources: ,. Name Source Paramount or EloinQe or IDS Address City State Zip Code Phone . MHFA FORM HTC-1 16 (12/98) R.I1 ~~'-~~tl . Actlvl A. SITE o tion/Contract Site Ac uisition Zonin A roval Site Anal is B. FINANCING 1 . Construction Losn Loan Iication Conditional Commitment Firm Commitment 2. Permanent Loan Loan Iication Conditional Commitment Firm Commitment 3. Other Loans Ie Grants and Source MHFA Super RFP -. Award 4. Other Loans Ie Grants T and Source Dakota Coun Tax Credits A Iication Award 5. Other Loans Ie Grants T e and Source A Iication Award C. PLANS AND SPECIFICATION , D. CLOSING AND TRANSFER OF PROPERTY E. CONSTRUCTION START F. COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION G. LEASE-UP H. CREDIT PLACED IN SERVICE DATE MHFA FORM HTC-1 17 ~~ ~ ~,-~~~ __...;.a;,;._~ , ,,'-~~'7"''".:'-~~ .~~,. -l.l.t,;~ ~ )11 . ~'" 11 .~?:/: ii,~' ;..:..:-..~~ ...""1=..-.."".......-..-""""~.1 , . '. .~.~..~.,~~~~..j ~~ 5-29-99 (12/98) of General Partner ~"" 06)J.!V'I yl- of: ~/~V.,,;J /JI?u1~ #t7N"w'?-.. t,t.c, . . its: CpL-l.F ,IhpW~ Print name of signatory, 't-,It/" 17 Date STATE OF MINNESOTA} 55 COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /f'fi) day of Ftbru. ~ r1 ' 19!1!/-, by -.JgYrjt.5 OI4,YJtV"/- .the [hid,1 AI/.~(1'1tY" -. 118m _ . title . of Iirrn1njf#n fttmllt{ ~iJti(J1) aYlinnt(dPt lifhlhd 1itzbJ f~ty(.{)m lJ/ltJj ( me of corporation). I . N-?/~ ~ 9H/mlf/ Notary Public /I'llv'''/G)~ /Hl/J1#~u! fm/s-7,v1;- SignatureofV2~ by: ~ ~ ,/ of: its: GxactJ.-J,'v.:o OI'rO,...{..o.- 6r.M. Print name of signatory, ~q rtMo~ ~I/f/qo., I Date STATE O~ MINNESOTA} COUNTY OF 55 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by /faro J d 1?r!~fa Ii- ,the ... of N'1,'nr1lfo/r) 1rfb,'ntlJIt /foJlfi'!f a (Name of corporation) ()J'PtJfml Y) ~...~~\ CYNTHIA NEWPORT ~Vf tlOT.ARY~\JilLIC'MNSOTA "..,. My t~~I'~iS'sil)(l Exp!relJln. 31. !lOG ......... . 19 ~~~. Notary Public MHFA FORM HTC-1 (12/98) City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.d.farmington.mn.us IOIJ TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator SUBJECT: League of MN Cities - Annual Conference DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION The annual League of MN Cities Conference is scheduled to be held in the city of Rochester from June 15-18, 1999. DISCUSSION This annual conference provides a variety of useful information on topics and issues affecting city government, including economic development, annexation, legislative changes affecting local government, technology, and responding to changing community dynamics. The opportunity to join with other elected officials and discuss issues of mutual public concern is a valuable attendance benefit. BUDGET IMPACT Costs for conference attendance are determined by the date of registration and whether attendance will be for the full conference or mini-conference, Early registration deadline is May 21 S\ with the cost for full attendance at $280 or mini-conference (Wednesday or ThursdayIFriday) at $145. In addition, housing reservations would need to be made as soon as possible subject to availability. Funding of approximately $2,000 is available in the 1999 Budget for Council conference attendance. ACTION REQUESTED If Council members are interested in attending this conference, please contact Cindy to make your registration and housing arrangements. hn F. Erar City Administrator League of Minnesota Cities Cities promoting ezceRence 145 Universit~, Avenue West. St. Paul, ~lX 55103-2044- phone: (651) 281-1200 · (800) 925-1122 Fax: (651) 281-1299 · TDD (651) 281-1290 March 20,1999 Dear City Clerk: I'm happy to invite you, others from your city staff and your city's elected and appointed ,officials to the 1999 LMC Annual Conference! This year, the Annual Conference is at the Mayo Civic Center in Rochester, June 15_18Ih. Its theme is Healthy Communities: Prescriptions for the Future. We're sending along this packet of materials to get you started-enclosed you'll find the Preliminary Conference Program, Registration and Housing information, a fun Family Program plan for seeing the sites around Rochester and material to help you identify and nominate candidates for the this year's CC Ludwig Award, LMC Leadership Awards and LMC City Achievement Awards. This year, the LMC Conference Planning Committee has designed an Annual Conference that's not to be missed! Here are just some of its highlights: . Critical and key topics addressed in 40 Concurrent Sessions-the largest number of sessions ever available at an LMC Annual Conference . Session tracks specifically geared toward Small Cities, Greater Minnesota Cities and Metro Cities . Keynote and general session presenters concemed with our 1999 theme of Healthy Communities . 150 vendors in Cities Marketplace, ready to answer your questions about their products and services . Recognition of outstanding contributions to the government of our Minnesota cities . Delightful opportunities to network with other mayors, councilmembers and city staff We're anticipating a great Annual Conference in Rochester, and hope you'll find this year's conference opportunity to be a good value. Plan to be a vital part of the 1999 LMC Annual Conference, and register now! Please review the enclosed materials and complete the enclosed registration form. Return it to us at the League of Minnesota Cities, along with the registration fee, Send it along as soon as possible-we'/I be happy to hear from you! If you have questions or concerns, don't hesitate to call Cathy Dovidio at 651/281-1250 or Jodie Tooley at 651/281-1251, Sincerely, ~ / If. (7'~ (.;(, <. 46die Tooley, Manager Conferences and Training AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Concurrent Sessions IV 11:30-12:30 p.m. Off the Record-Practicing Media Relations Energizing Downtown (SC) . How to Partner With Ag Resources in Your Community (GMC) Strengthening Neighborhoods (MC) Promoting the Benefits and Costs of City Services The City's Role in Workforce Development Checkup Session-Cultural Diversity erest Session-Especially for Cities With Unions City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us JOe TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator~ FROM: James Bell, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - Accept MnDot Grant - Senior Center Van DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION Notice of grant approval has been received by the City from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to fund transportation needs at the Senior Center. DISCUSSION MnDot has awarded a grant to the Senior Center for a new Senior Van. This van will be shared by the City and the Dakota Area Resources and Transportation for Seniors (DARTS). The van will be stored in the City to allow more usage by City residents when DARTS is providing service. Maintenance will be provided by DARTS, with the City providing a small yearly fee. Staffis planning to use the maintenance building on Pine Street for the storage site. Staff has applied for this grant for the past several years with little success. This year's application, according to MnDOT, was written so well that MoDot is recommending the City and DARTS be awarded a grant this year rather than in 2000. This speaks very well for involved department staff and DARTS staff in pursuing this funding for a new senior van. BUDGET IMPACT The City share of the matching funds for this grant is $5,040. Staff is pursuing funding from sources other than the City and will make recommendations for funding ata later date. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution accepting the MnDot grant for the new Senior Center van. Respectfully submitted, ,J--.-J c?~~~ James Bell Parks and Recreation Director PROPOSED RESOLUTION No. ACCEPTING MNDOT GRANT - SENIOR CENTER VAN Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 19th day of April, 1999 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, the City has received a MnDot grant for a van to be used at the Senior Center; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept such grants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby accepts the MnDot grant for a van to be used at the Senior Center. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 19th day of April, 1999. Mayor Attested to the day of April, 1999. City Administrator SEAL City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.d.farmin~on.mn.us IOd TO: Mayor and Council Members, City Administrato~ . ()I 0 MIchael Schultz ()C Associate Planner FROM: SUBJECT: Oak Place Townhome Preliminary and Final Plat DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION Colin Garvey and Pete Elvestad are seeking preliminary and final plat approval on the Oak Place townhome development. DISCUSSION Colin Garvey and Pete Elvestad of Farmington Development Corporation are seeking Preliminary and Final Plat approval of a six (6) unit townhome development located within the 100 block of Oak Street, located just west of the core downtown area. The proposed townhomes would consist of slab on grade construction on just over one (1) acre of property. Mr. Garvey received conditional use approval on November 10, 1998 to construct townhome units within a B-2 (General Business) District. Staff and the developer's engineer, Grant Jacobson, has addressed all major engineering and planning issues involved with the project. Two minor issues remain concerning the plat, one is concerning the labeling of the drainage and utility easement, the other concerns additional trees be planted between the townhome units and the railroad, those issues can be resolved before the filing of the plat. The additional tree plantings may be considered to be done within the City park property between the project and the railroad, this will continue to be discussed with the developer. The Parks & Recreation Board has recommended to receive cash-in-lieu of the land dedication on this project. The Fire Marshall and Fire Chief have reviewed the proposed plat and did not have any concerns or comments to forward. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 9, 1999 and forwarded a recommendation to approve the preliminary and final plat to the City Council (see attached March 9, 1999 minutes). ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution approving the preliminary and final plats for the Oak Place T ownhomes contingent on; 1. Resolution of the landscaping and easement issues as described. cc: Colin Garvey RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING OF FINAL PLAT OAK PLACE TOWNHOMES Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 19th day of April, 1999 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member _ introduced and Member _ seconded the following: WHEREAS, the preliminary and fmal plat of Oak Place Townhomes is now before the Council for review and approval; and WHEREAS, a public hearing of the Planning Commission was held on the 9th day of March, 1999 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and proper notice sent to surrounding property owners; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the preliminary and fmal plat; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be feasibly served by municipal service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above fmal plat be approved and that the requisite signatures are authorized and directed to be affixed to the final plat. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 19th day of April, 1999. Mayor Attested to the _ day of April, 1999. City Administrator Chair Schwing presented the possibilities to the applicants on the action they would desire to take at this time, Discussion took place on the processes and the possibilities that exist at this time. MOTION by Rotty, second by Johnson to continue the public hearing to April 13, 1999. YEs: Larson, Johnson, Rotty; NO: Ley, Schwing. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Schwing, second by Johnson to direct staff to re-notify the surrounding property owners of the continued public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED, MOTION by Rotty, second by Johnson to direct staff of the text amendment concerning adopting an Interim Use Ordinance. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 4. Chair Schwing began the next public hearing on the application to amend the Comprehensive Plan for Silver Springs 3rd Addition. Commissioner Rotty suggested that the Commission take the next item also concerning the application to rezone of Silver Springs 3rd. Associate Planner Schultz informed the Commission that the applicant did not submit an Abstractor's List in time for the public hearing notices to be sent to residents after public notification was given in the newspaper. Commissioner Rotty suggested that the applicant, Mr. Giles, hold a neighborhood meeting prior to the public hearing to resolve any issues with the neighbors. Olson replied that staff can suggest that to the applicant but we can not legally require that a neighborhood meeting be held. (Action was not necessary due to an incomplete submission for a public hearing, the hearing will be re-advertised for the April 13, 1999 Planning Commission meeting) *5. Planner Schultz presented to the Commission the staff report on the preliminary and final plat of Oak Place townhomes. Schultz stated that a number of issues were discussed in a meeting between Engineering staff and the developer's engineer, which included; the placement of water lines, replacing the existing sanitary sewer and replacing and moving a catch basin on the property. Schultz added that staff recommended some landscape changes in the type of tree species on the plan. Chair Schwing requested any comments or questions from the public and the applicant. Commissioner Johnson asked why staff was requiring the sanitary sewer line upgrade and placement within the street. City Engineer Auge responded that the four inch (4") line was not adequate and the suggested placement of the line by the developer would interrupt other utilities that are typically put in the suggested location. MOTION by Rotty, second by Larson to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Larson, second by Ley to approve the preliminary and final plat ofthe Oak Place Townhomes and forward the plat to the City Council contingent on: a) all engineering issues be resolved; b) all landscape issues be resolved. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 6. Chair Schwing opened the hearing on amending Title 10, chapter 4, Section 4: Non- conforming lots. Commissioner Rotty suggested that because staff is recommending continuing the public hearing that all discussion be held until the next scheduled meeting. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.d.farmington.mn.us TO: City Planning Commission Michael Schultz JJLR Associate Planner}/ I FROM: SUBJECT: Preliminary & Final Plat of Oak Place Townhomes DATE: March 9, 1999 PLANNING DIVISION REVIEW Applicant: Colin Garvey Farmington Development Corp. 21080 Eaton Avenue Farmington, MN 55024 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Landscaping Plan 5. Engineering Comments 6. Conditional Use Permit Approval/Minutes Location of Property: North half of 100 Block of Oak Street Legal Description: Lots 10, 11, 12 & 13 of Block 17, Town of Farmington Size of Property: 1.07 acres Current Land Use: Vacant Open Space Current Zoning: B-2 (General Business) Proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use: Medium Density Area Currently Bounded By: North: Business (Burger King) South: Business (Lamperts Yard) East: Park and Railroad West: Single-family Proposed Numberffype of Units: 6 slab on grade units ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Colin Garvey of Farmington Development Corporation is seeking Preliminary and Final Plat approval of a six (6) unit townhome development located within the 100 block of Oak Street, located just west of the core downtown area. The proposed townhomes would consist of slab on grade construction on just over one (1) acre of property. Mr. Garvey received a conditional use approval on November 10, 1998 to construct townhome units within a B-2 (General Business) District contingent upon any unresolved Engineering and Planning Division issues. The Engineering issues are spelled out in the attached memo from the Director of Public Works Lee Mann. The City Housing and Redevelopment Authority purchased the subject properties in a series of acquisitions during the late 1980's in an effort to cleanup and redevelop the block commercially. The HRA has requested bids for the property since the early 1990's and in the summer of 1998 Mr. Garvey proposed construction of townhome units. Staff and the developer's engineer, Grant Jacobson, discussed the list of issues in a meeting on March 4, 1999, in which the engineering issues were discussed. The two main issues discussed concern replacement of the existing four (4") inch CIP water main with a six (6") DIP main line within the street ROW, and the requirement that the sanitary sewer services be connected to the existing sanitary sewer in the center of Oak street. The developer had originally proposed to construct a parallel sanitary sewer line in the boulevard to serve the property, which is not consistent with City standards. Public Works Director Lee Mann indicated that the Water Board will consider participating in the cost of reconstruction of the water main at the March 22, 1999 Water Board meeting. Staff has also reviewed the Landscaping plan and has several recommendations. Staff recommends that a fence be placed along the east property line to provide a buffer between the townhomes and the railroad. Also, staff suggests that Sugar Maple not be planted on this specific site because of difficulty for it to grow, staff suggest either Red Armstrong Maple or October Glory Maple (at 2~ inch caliper). Staff also will require that five (5') foot high Spruce replace the proposed three (3') foot. The Park & Recreation Department will be suggesting to the Park Board at the next scheduled meeting (March 8, 1999) to receive cash in lieu of park dedication for the platted property; results of that meeting will be given to the Commission at the meeting. The Fire Marshall and Fire Chief have reviewed the proposed plat and did not have any concerns or comments to forward on the Commission. ACTION REQUESTED Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary and Final plat contingent upon the following and to forward it onto the City Council; 1) To resolve all engineering issues per the attached Engineering Division review comments; 2) That the proposed landscaping plans be revised as per staff suggestions and City Ordinance requirements pertaining to landscaping. Sincerely Submitte JJZ . / Michael Schultz Associate Planner 0- m - > - c: o o- m o o ....J III z+w ~ ~ I r 1 I I r I I I 1 II I I-- n I I - I ,...--- ---l .L--1 - t-- - r- - r= nil - 1:::= J I-- I I r- ML1, IlU L -., I II r - G UIIIU '- I-- I I L ,- t-- J is mlS ~ JL ~ I L ~ I III I 'l- l [ I 1 L ,- - r ~ r-- --l - ~ III II - r-- - ~ I I I I .L8_ I I I i peOJlle~ 'd '0 ~ lit tL -<<i l' - 1 1 I ! I I - Iii - - Iii - iJ--- i - Iii ~ I~ - I- - - f--- L I - J n: J J~ --I t-- L- t-- L is lS~ ,- 111l1i I ~- - lJ l----r-l ,- I - -----, r I I I I - r- - ---I 1 - ---' f-- I - - - - r _ - I-- t-- - - r-- - - - l- I-- --l - I- - - ~ - - - l- I-- _JL J I-- J I ~ ~ L JL is NOISI^IO ~ b ~I r- I r I - - - - - r W -I\' >-ll.u, .+1-jo dl -I HIJ11I 8 ::5L I 0~":S~ ~~~:"l v 0 1I1 I V 1I Y. a... I "<~; - - - ~lIQcV14.1",1t_ 0:.. ". --_........ o I I '-" ....::: - >- ,~ ~ ~ I ~ "ll< 0: ~.. I 8 ~ ~I ~! R · z I .. Sa.. ~ I ~~ ~. ~ I.w I : ~; ,. a : I ~I~ ~ I =.- : I~" I: o I : I : o I () ~I ~ : ~ I l..! ~a- I \ 0' L____ "ll< _..: .~trA.-r- 1fQJd5'1J uran",=JOIIII'I1ICI I ""OLI . .11:._ N ott - 1"" NOIONlnllVJ JO NMO! , I ~ , t I I ,. · I' J 1 ,t 'I i J I Ii!. j I: I! f I~ ~, II i! !i Ij I I Jl ). li!f I~ I j' H If If I: I II -I : 11. I) I~ if!; II * f' ,I. it Ii .1 il ~ I! II~ if 'j'; ii.f ft 11, I :. .(1 :IJ 11:1 ;11: 11f, I 'Jlt f I lit! I lid I tf~1 II ij!l , fl.1) II, ~liI "f' , I fIll ! .: I , II 1 . I I I ) f . I Iii "f ;1. I d I I I I , . I I , I f II ! f I II t II ~ f, · I I i I ~ i I \ \ I I I I :S I~ ;~ i ~ ~ I- i! I , i I I ! J II II II n I t i I . 1 1 I. I . I I I III II " .! I III !i / i Ii I II s. -'7 'r'.1 ~~ ;I~!' ~ .. II . I II J. I I I I f f , J , . i t I I I 1 I I I ~ I . , I I. ~ I If !' f ,f II i I . I l ' d iI . I I I fI !I I , . I I I I I I I I * I I I , J I I , f I I , I f f . . Ii --.../z Ii I i~ I _, ~ 1 J II r l II !!-l il I · 5 I II ~ ili - l!s - ~ ili II 41 ., ~ .'r I .~ I I -t '. '0 I L,'/ I .,...1 'F....... ~ 1-- i~ ....,.,.. _ -~.,. I / I r ~I I . : I ..../'l ,<iI' a' / ~: if. i I ,. ,fll . I I. I I J I 1Il.. .,. I ~ I~! ill' i I I I: ....; : W I..~': fil... I, -'4_ I' .:; !in I'~ .I; lis u I~ I ~ I I : I: 1Il , o ... " I~ ... ~ //. I. 'Moll -1 ~. Y ll'[i] ,"".. ~ I} ~, " C!tbJ ..10 1\.1 ~ \ \ I \ \ ~ I \ I blJ r In' /Z I! · II ! I -ill · R .I fll {I-I' ~ I~I ' i I' e~ . J Im~ !II II I nlnl .... :5 tin. <>- ,1'0 ~~ I I ~~ U 0::1 w !l: I 3! I .11 ~ il. ~ 1. ~~;! I II ~ HI ~~21 ~I'" 11!.l I ;11. Yl :! / [ill I !in I Ii~ ill u !l ~l .1 .~ I ~ I ~ I I: I~ I ; I 0= 10= ( I 1 I I City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mike Schultz, Associate Planner FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Oak Place Plat review DATE: March 3, 1999 The engineering division has completed the review of the plat and construction plans submitted for Oak Place (see attached). The major engineering issues are resolved contingent on the Developer's compliance with staf:fs review comments and it is recommended that the preliminary and final plat be approved. Respectfully Submitted, ~m~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file David L. Olson, Director of Community Development City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.d.farmington.mn.us March 4, 1999 Mr. Grant Jacobson Jacobson Engineers and Surveyors PO Box 541 Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: Oak Place Dear Mr. Jacobson: Attached are the engineering staff s review comments for the above referenced project. Please address the comments with your next submittal. As discussed during our meeting this morning, it is required that the sanitary sewer services be connected to the existing sanitary sewer in the center of Oak Street. Also, the existing sub-standard 4-inch elP water main will need to be removed and replaced with 6-inch DIP water main, in the current location. Water services will then be connected to the new main. If you have any further comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me @ (651)-463-1601. Sincerely, ~Yvl~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public works/City Engineer attachments cc: file City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmin~on.mn.us TO: Lee M. Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: David R. Sanocki, Engineering Division SUBJECT: Oak Place Plan Review Comments DATE: March 2, 1999 . Following are engineering comments related to the review of the plans submitted for Oak Place dated February 2, 1999: Plat: 1. The drainage and utility easement along the north property line of this development needs to be I5-feet wide rather than to-feet wide as currently shown on the plat. 2. Provide easement at the northeast comer of the plat for roadway purposes to allow for improved alley radius. Currently, maintenance vehicles cannot make the curve without driving off of the pavement. Grading Plan: 1. Add rock construction entrance for site grading. 2. Place erosion control around inlet structures. 3. Add Note: Seeding of the site shall be completed within two weeks of grading. 4. Show proposed exterior finished grade spot elevations. 5. Swale grades should be a minimum of 1.5%. Boulevard grades should be 2%. 6. Rear lot swales must be seeded and blanketed or sodded when grading is completed. 7. Soils report and grading specifications must be submitted. 8. List proposed garage floor elevations. 9. Provide legend for proposed type of house. Street & Utility Plan: 1. The standard location for utilities is in the street. 2. Provide typical section for street repair section (See City plate #STR-06). 3. Reference City of Farmington Standard Plates. 4. Provide street lighting plan. 5. Provide signage plan. 6. Provide signature block for City Engineer. 7. Concrete sidewalk, with pedestrian ramps (See City plate #STR -17), will be required on the north side of Oak. Street. 8. Concrete aprons will be required within city right of way (See City plate #STR-ll). 9. All services (sewer and water) should extend 15' into private property. 10. Sanitary sewer services to connect to the existing sanitary sewer line (centerline Oak. Street). 11. Existing sanitary and water services need to be abandoned and should be plugged or removed at the main. 12. The proposed location of a 4" water main to service the project is where gas, electric, cable and telephone will be, or are, located (See plate STR-23). The existing 4" CIP water main at the curb line on the north side of Oak. Street is substandard and needs to be replaced. It is recommended that the existing 4" CIP water main be removed and replaced with 6" DIP water main, subject to concurrence from the Fire Marshall regarding fire flows. 13. B612 curb should be placed on the north side of Oak Street to match the south side of Oak. Street. Provide cut downs for driveway openings. 14. Show length, size and type of pipe on the utility plan view sheet. 15. Label all fittings, valves and hydrants. 16. Provide storm and sanitary schedule. 17. List class of sanitary and storm pipe. 18. Fittings shall be made in USA or Canada. 19. Show all utility profiles with crossings. 20. The existing FES located at the NE corner of the site should be eliminated. Construct a beehive catch basin in this area and connect into the main 60" storm line/MH located northeast of the FES. 21. Contact utility companies about project. Replacement of existing utilities may be necessary for this development. Res~JP;;f li David R. Sanocki cc: file Jerry Auge, Engineering Division Lee Smick, Planning Coordinator f.....~. :; J Planning Commission Minutes Regular November 10, 1998 1. Chair Schlawin called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Schlawin, Schwing, Larson, Rotty, Ley Members Absent: None Also Present: Planning Coordinator Smick, Associate Planner Schultz 2. Schlawin requested comments from the Commission on the minutes for September 22, 1998. Schlawin noted that the word "regularly" should be stuck and replaced with "special" in line 1 of section 1. No other comments were made. MOTION by Rotty, second by Schwing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Schlawin requested comments for the minutes of October 13, 1998. There were none. MOTION by Rotty, second by Schwing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Chair Schlawin opened all the public hearings scheduled for the November 10, 1998 Planning Commission meeting. 2. Planner Smick began the continued public hearing for the Cameron Woods Senior Living Preliminary Plat from the October 27th Planning Commission meeting. Smick informed the Commission that the developer's engineer would not be able to submit the revised plans by November 9, 1998. Smick added that as of this time those plans still have not been submitted and that it is staff's recommendation to continue the hearing to the November 24th meeting. Commissioner Rotty asked if the hearing could be pushed to the first meeting in December due to the Thanksgiving holiday week. Smick stated that a public hearing notice has been submitted to the Fannington Independent but could possibly be pulled before printing. The Commission agreed that the special meeting in November should be canceled due to the holiday week. The Commission and staff briefly discussed what problems are holding up the project. MOTION by Rotty, second by Ley to continue the public hearing to the first meeting in December. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. Smick presented the conditional use pennit for Oak Place Townhomes located between Lampart's Lumber and Burger King. Smick explained that the proposed project would consist of 6 townhome units within a B-2 zone, which is a conditional use. Smick informed the Commission that the proposed use meets all the requirements in the zoning code. The Commission questioned Mr. Garvey about some the details of the project and the property. Larson asked if the bituminous road to the east would be utilized. Mr. Garvey informed the Commission that that is City property. Sharon Willis, 105 Oak St.: What will the project do to our property values and will it effect our property taxes. Chair Schlawin responded that the Commission could not answer those questions. Mr. Garvey added that these units are slab on grade townhomes marketed toward persons 55 years and older. Commissioner Rotty added that since this property is zoned B-2 that this use might be more desirable. Ken Kuchera, 1317 Fairview: Could six more additional townhome units be added in the rear of the property. Collin Garvey responded that because of the requirement to pave the alley it would not be feasible to do that. Rotty commented that this type of land use would be acceptable due to the lack of access for a commercial use although there is commercial to the north and south. The Commission and staff began a long discussion concerning the option of rezoning the property to an appropriate zone instead of a conditional use permit. It was noted that the property has been rezoned several times in the past between high density and business. MOTION by Rotty, second by Schwing to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Rotty, second by Larson to approve the conditional use permit contingent upon any unresolved engineering and planning division issues. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 4. The Commission and staff briefly discussed the progress of the Comprehensive Plan update and the upcoming joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting on November 18,1998. 5. There being no furthet business the Commission agreed to adjourn. Submitted by, Michael Schultz Associate Planner Approved City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmin~on.mn.us TO: Mayor & Councilmembers FROM: John. F. Erar, City Administrator SUBJECT: Supplemental Agenda DATE: April 19, 1999 Attached is a supplemental item for the April 19, 1999 agenda. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 10 (e) Adopt Resolution - Oak Place Townhomes Development Contract (Supplemental Information) Staff is requesting Council approve the execution of the Development Contract for Oak Place Townhomes and adopt a resolution authorizing its signing. Respectfully submitted, HIL- t::;, Erar City Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us /Oe TO: Mayor and Councilmembers City Administrator fJL FROM: David L. Olson Community Development Director SUBJECT: Oak Place Townhomes Development Contract DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION The Development Contract for Oak Place Townhomes has been drafted in accordance with the approval and conditions placed on the approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat. DISCUSSION The Oak Place Townhomes Addition Development Contract reqmres the following conditions to be agreed upon: · The Developer enters into the Development Contract; and · The Developer provides the necessary security in accordance with the terms of the Contract; and · The Developer complete all required improvements in accordance with plans approved by the City Engineer. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Oak Place Townhomes Preliminary and Final Plat on March 9, 1999 subject to the resolution of all comments from the Engineering Division. The City has received revised plans from the Developer's engineer on Friday, April 16th , 1999 and it appears as though issues have been adequately addressed. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the proposed Development Contract for the Oak Place Townhomes. The Developer has expressed objections to the City regarding several of the proposed charges contained in the Development Contract. These include the Surface Water Management Fee, Sewer and Water Trunk Area Charges, and the Water Treatment Plant Fee and Park Dedication Fees. It is the Developer's position that since this area was previously platted and previously contained single-family dwellings, that the area should not be subject to these fees as part of the re-platting and redevelopment of the area. The City's practice has been to charge these types of fees in areas that are being redeveloped. Projects such as City Center and the Eagles Club were assessed similar charges. The rationale for this position is that if a property has not been charged an area or trunk charge previously, then it is appropriate to charge these fees when a property is being redeveloped. Mr. Garvey and his attorney may be present at the April 19, 1999 Council meeting to express their views on this issue. BUDGET IMP ACT None ACTION REQUESTED Approve the execution of the Development Contract and adopt the attached resolution authorizing its signing contingent upon the above conditions and approval by the Engineering Division. Respectfully submitted, .. .../.4? ~-~ Da 1 L. Olson Community Development Director cc: Colin Garvey RESOLUTION NO. R APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT OAK PLACE TOWNHOMES Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers in City Hall of said City on the 19th day of April, 1999 at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , the City Council approved the Preliminary and Final Plat of Oak Place Townhomes subject to conditions. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The Development Contract for the aforementioned subdivision, a copy of which is on file in the Clerk's office is hereby approved. The Mayor and Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to sign such contract. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the day of ,199_. Gerald Ristow, Mayor Attested to this _ day of ,199 . SEAL John F. Erar, City Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington. MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us IO-f TO: Mayor and Council Members, City Administrator 1~ FROM: Michael Schultz f'v() Associate Planner V SUBJECT: East Farmington 6th Addition Preliminary and Final Plat DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION Sienna Corporation is seeking Preliminary and Final Plat approval for the East Farmington 6th Addition plat. DISCUSSION The East Farmington 6th Addition is a continuation of the East Farmington PUD development. The plat includes seventy-six (76) single-family lots. The 6th Addition will complete six entire blocks within the East Farmington PUD with connections being made to developed blocks within the 2nd and 5th Additions. Blocks 1, 5 and 6 on the north side of the 6th Addition comply with the requirements approved in the East Farmington PUD amendment for the 5th Addition (see attached plat and resolution within the Planning Commission memo). The PUD amendment required that these blocks provide for 17 lots in Block 1 and 16 lots in Blocks 5 and 6. The remaining Blocks 2, 3 and 4 provide 17 lots in each block. All of the lots shown in the 6th Addition comply with the R-2 PUD requiring lots at a minimum of 6,000 square feet. The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposed plat and has recommended that the preliminary and final plat for the East Farmington 5t Addition be approved contingent upon the attached requirements from Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the matter on April 13, 1999 and forwarded a recommendation to approve the preliminary and final plat of East Farmington 6th Addition to the City Council. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution approving the preliminary and final plats for the East Farmington 6th Addition contingent on Engineering requirements. Respectfully Submi <-A Michael Schultz Associate Planner cc: Jim Sturm, James R. Hill RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING OF FINAL PLAT EAST FARMINGTON 6TH ADDITION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 19th day of April, 1999 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member _ introduced and Member _ seconded the following: WHEREAS, the preliminary and final plat of East Farmington 6th Addition is now before the Council for review and approval; and WHEREAS, a public hearing of the Planning Commission was held on the 13th day of April, 1999 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and proper notice sent to surrounding property owners; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the preliminary and final plat; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be feasibly served by municipal service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above fmal plat be approved and that the requisite signatures are authorized and directed to be affixed to the fmal plat with the following stipulations: 1. Drainage and utility easements over outlots A, B and C need to be dedicated to the City. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 19th day of April, 1999. Mayor Attested to the _ day of April, 1999. City Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.d.farmington.mn.us TO: City Planning Commission FROM: Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator DATE: April 13, 1999 SUBJECT: East Farmington 6th Addition Preliminary and Final Plat Plannin!! Division Review Applicant: Sienna Corporation 4940 Viking Drive Suite 608 Minneapolis, MN 55435 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. 6th Addition Preliminary & Final Plat 3. Plat Application 4. 5th Addition PUD, Plat & Resolution 5. Engineering Division Comments Proposed Development: Seventy-six (76) single-family lots are proposed on approximately 19.33 acres (or approximately 6 blocks) within the 6th Addition of the East Farmington PUD development. . Location of Development: The 6th Addition is located south of the 5th Addition and east of the 2nd Addition within the East Farmington residential development. The streets proposed in the 6th Addition include Twelfth, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, Locust and Larch. Area Bounded by: Single-family residential on the north and west, vacant land on the south and the Prairie Waterway on the east. Existing Zoning: R-2 PUD Streets and Accesses: Streets included in the 6th Addition are Twelfth, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, Locust and Larch and will be extended from these existing streets in the 2nd and 5th Additions. Water & Sewer: Water and sewer is available to the 6th Addition. Sidewalks: Sidewalks are required along all streets within the 6th Addition. Additional Comments Sienna Corporation is proposing the continuation of the East Farmington PUD with the 6th Addition that includes seventy-six (76) single-family lots. The 6th Addition will complete six entire blocks within the East Farmington PUD with the connection of developed lots in the 2nd and 5th Additions. Blocks 1, 5 and 6 on the north side of the 6th Addition comply with the requirements approved in the East Farmington PUD amendment for the 5th Addition (see attached plat and resolution). The PUD amendment required that these blocks provide for 17 lots in Block 1 and 16 lots in Blocks 5 and 6. The remaining Blocks 2, 3 and 4 provide 17 lots in each block. All of the lots shown in the 6th Addition comply with the R-2 PUD requiring lots at a minimum of 6,000 square feet. The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposed plat and has recommended that the preliminary and final plat for the East Farmington 5th Addition be approved contingent upon the attached requirements from Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Action Requested Recommend approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat of East Farmington 6th Addition contingent on the requirements outlined by the Engineering Division and forward the recommendations to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, ee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator cc: Jim Sturm, James R. Hill I tIJ z.~ 0 II) ~ ~ ~ ::J: C) 5: ~g g , cl c 0 ;:l _:a ~~ ~ -"1:11 lie( Wfj . 1- -c is r- eat 0..5 ~ - II 12TH ST II. - ~~II ~ - II 1,1 I I I I I-- - aiggg - I I I I a ggg fEE - - I ~~ffitI - III I -I I III - ~ - - - - ~ - D - - - "" :1 I - - - I I TRUNK HIGHWAY 3 ( -, I I I Iir-l r--l I I r I I I I I I , I ~! ---~---&t ----, ; I I I -,. I "'_ I 0: t: : Cl: Cl: <( I Z I o : E (~: e 11:: : -r- e ~': : <( : ~.--.j en · Z'---' - : I I Z -,. i I :i () : t a: ~~ : I u.<( ::~ : := ! <(I- Q~ i (1) <( LI_ W ----I I I >- : ~~ : ~f I I ~ - (:J <( tl~ -,. "'. 0 ~- ,,, !! .../ -,. "'- ~- 4~ i!9 ~ i:C: <( .. I LI_ ia . I ~- (,') <( Ld I , I : ::: t.j : J ~) uJ I 11'l:r.:: I ~S~:~ I .( >- I I ...~:) I !! i ~ ~'" ~:I ....... l;i!: : ~~ ___ _L___J ---T-- _un, ~ili. i ~~ .,., Z 0 ~ ~ .~. ~:. . oj r ::l j I J e w a sf ,~ If I z C'l - ~:. "",lllrnw ''IVI..Llu\.JV i.SCJ L1 ..... &SIU .......... '_1 ,. IOllno . .., Ihl- - ... :\1r'\1(\I\III^I\IW I I ~V-,-....JI 'fIr 1C:! 11_4 J.~ ----- 1-\....1-' ...l..~ v_j ! .. I!' -. <- 0 t? <- > t~ iL: .( Lo. r,: to "J ~- OX (/l >- .~ -. <) ~~ .;: rL: .( L._ ~- t~ [.: o ~~ <- > ,1~ <' I..: ~- In .( LoJ ~ .'. I I I I .. I "....r\--,..... ~I .. u.. "..'1:; .. ,1""\ I C'.'I'A" 1'-' I I'tV~.II"U,,:JV_-. . < . . ib ~~ tz t~2lh I!!I ~E!llli5 ~ m .hB~ 1:1 CD ~U~~ 1!!!11 N 5sdi @ IT! 1!!!11 .....0.. ~..-=.~~~~-; ~ I I I I I -" \ , I -,. "'- o ~: Cl o <( 'too ", ~ <:::" ~- (/) i:C 2~A I <i" [,: I~i i ~\ I~' I .--t---!I' i I III d I ~ !!d : I i ~;2 I~ J I i II =is I I I Iii! ~~ h ~I;p I!M ja n .i. 'I iil ~ Ii t ! -' fi i I I; .0 6661 90:ti~ :60 92 Qa~ !J~ Hl9d~I9.l\rl!l9\S!:l3f'OOd\OYJOlnY\:~ ~. JAMES R. HILL, INC. PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 2500 WEST (OUNTY ROAD 42, SUITE 120, BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337" (612) 890-6044 FAX B90-6244 February 25, 1999 Ms. Lee Smick Planning Coordinator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 RE: East Farmington Sixth Addition Dear Lee: On behalf of Sienna Corporation, please accept the application for the East Farmington Sixth Addition consisting of 7.6 single-family lots located directly south of the Fifth Addition and east of the Second Addition. The plan as submitted is in conformance with the previously approved Planned Development Amendment. Attached are the application along with the Preliminary and Final Plat fees and surety. The property owners list has been ordered and I will forward it to you as soon as I receive it. The detailed engineering plans are being completed now and will follow next week. If you would like additional information, please contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, JAMES R. HTT.T., INC. Jim Sturm, l\SLA Vice President, Planning JS:vjl cc:Rodney Hardy-Sienna Corp. FEB-2~-1~ 1~:23 JAMES R. HILL. INC. 612 890 6244 P.02/02 Al1>LICATIO' FOR PUt lEVIE\l nAIl February 26, 1999 PLAT 1I~ East Farmington Sixth Addition. Section 32, Township 114. Range 19 LOCATION A1EA BOUNDED Bt East Farmington Fifth Addition (North) TO'tAL GllOSS a\UA 19.33 acres ZONING DISTlICT(S) Planned Development ~s , ADDI!SSIS or ALL OWNEIS Sienna Corporation Suite 608 Minneapolis, MN 55435 . 4940 Viking Dri~ei nONE: (612) 835-2808. NAME &: ADDWS or UN]) StmVEYOR/ENGINED. James R. Hill, IRe ~ 2500 W. Count:y Road 42. Suite 120 Burn.ville, MN 55337PiONE (612L 890-6044 NAHES , ADDUSSES OF AU. ADJ01NINC PROPERXY owns I,.VAn.AJLE nOM: Uni versal Title ONl PLAT UVlEW 01'tIOH: " PRELIMINAll.Y , r11W. 'l'0GnliE1: tes .IN SEQUENCE: PIUl: PLAt _SDATIVE m~ . $1~4~4 'U"PLAT StJJE'li1 $4,000 ($750 + 9- x' 76"lou ;; $1,"434)' _. '. ($200 x 20 acres - $4,000) I llIUBt cnnrr tHA.t I All (lit ~) D! !'E! OWNER(S) or TBE ABOVE tA1G>, TBAT.tBE PERSON PUPAllING DE nAT lIAS BECnvED A COP! or TITLE 11. CHAPDtS 1 TD.U' s. DttItLED "SUBDIVISIOJS" AN]) tln.E 10. CHAP'rERS 1 tB1lU 12 ENTItLED "ZONING" or TIlE FAIH1NGTON cnt co>>E ANI> VILL PUlARE THE l"LAT IN ACCO'iDANC! WIt! THE rllovtsIoNS COtttAlNlJ) mwl'. Final Plat Fee - $300 Total: $5,734 ~1;~ ILl /).~ ' DAti I ! A1)V1SOll ~GI 1. surCH PUN 2. SIAFF A.'qJ) 1)EVELOPlll CONSENSUS TOT~ P.02 ........ __1"1)' t(tiI; ..,...... 'Orl ... 'It . U3 .. oog: " -. SlIOO'l1ll1S / SllDNl!lHl / SlOHNYld '~U! 'mH 'H sewer D CD .- CD I X W a ::::) a. a w (/) 5 w 0:: ,..... w ~ zU <(0 ...J...J a..1Il o...J ~<( o..~ a.. u>- 1=1- <(LL :::to w J:Z ()o cni= o o <( '-'" -........ ~~ --.......- I _ _ -..... ,........-..- .........-.- ........... ...- .... .. ,.,."...- ...-....-- ..... - --... ... Ymars ~ NY'ld and :>LLYft3H:lS a .LIBIHX:J and cmSIA:JH .. .. .. ; ~ !~ ~~ ~ IS - i .., ~r, ih i~ir d ~m ; !SIR !BITB I itrnIl. t1r:rE liD:a eJI i' ! - ! K. ... .J . i I · OC.... ........,.. ..... "YI' .' '" "~,~ ~:=b .~... <: .~ li " :> () .. " I . I I , ~ : I I I , I I I I I I I I I l,n:r.o ':,"::':;;':., \\:~~). .~ ."(:~~. t . - ~I :~ i ~ h i:ll i! i 9661 lr :.0 :Zl 01 6ny liON HX3.IS9\'IS9\SlJ:JrOOd\IIY:IOtnn:~ -~. . City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.d.farmineton.mn.us TO: Lee Smick, Planning Coordinator FROM: Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: East Fannington Sixth Addition - Preliminary and Final plat review DATE: April 8, 1999 Engineering has completed review of the Preliminary and Final Plat for East Farmington Sixth Addition and fOlwards the following comments: 1. Drainage and utility easements over outlots A, B and C need to be dedicated to the City. 2. The standard City easement required for storm sewer utilities is 10-feet on either side of the pipe. For the storm sewer lines that are draining the backyard outlots, 20-foot easements need to be provided where possible in backyard areas. 3. The grading plan shows stonn water being discharged overland from the intersection of Twelfth and Larch Street to the south. The details of where that discharge is being routed and the grading involved needs to be clarified. These issues need to be addressed before the City Council gives fmal plat approval. All engineering comments forwarded in staff's letter dated 4/8/99 need to be addressed before approval of the final engineering plans. Respectfully Submitted, 'dkfYl~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file John Erar, City Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us I~ TO: Mayor and Councilmembers City Administrator1"- FROM: David L. Olson Community Development Director SUBJECT: East Farmington 6th Addition Development Contract DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION The Development Contract for East Farmington 6th Addition has been drafted in accordance with the approval and conditions placed on the approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat. DISCUSSION The East Farmington 6th Addition Development Contract reqmres the following conditions to be agreed upon: . The Developer enters into the Development Contract; and . The Developer provides the necessary security in accordance with the terms of the Contract; and . The Developer complete all required improvements in accordance with plans approved by the City Engineer. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the East Farmington 6th Addition Preliminary and Final Plat on April 13, 1999 subj ect to approval of incorporating several additional easements and providing clarification of one area of the proposed grading plan. These issues have been adequately addressed. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the Development Contract for the East Farmington 6th Addition. BUDGET IMPACT None ACTION REQUESTED Approve the execution of the Development Contract and adopt the attached resolution authorizing its signing contingent upon the above conditions and approval by the Engineering Division. Respectfully submitted, Community Development Director cc: Jim Sturm, James R. Hill Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation RESOLUTION NO. R APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT EAST FARMINGTON 6TH ADDITION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers in City Hall of said City on the 19th day of April, 1999 at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , the City Council approved the Preliminary and Final Plat of East Farmington Sixth Addition subject to conditions. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The Development Contract for the aforementioned subdivision, a copy of which is on file in the Clerk's office is hereby approved. The Mayor and Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to sign such contract. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the day of , 199_. Gerald Ristow, Mayor Attested to this _ day of , 199_ SEAL John F. Erar, City Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 104 TO: ~ayor an~ ~ounc.il.l jM~bers, CIty AdmmIstrato~!;i', ,..~ Michael Schultz t Associate Planner FROM: SUBJECT: Application to Amend the Comprehensive Plan and Rezone Properties on North side of County Road 72 DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION The application to amend the Comprehensive Plan and the application to rezone the properties on the north side of County Road 72 may be reviewed simultaneously with separate actions for each application. DISCUSSION The City has initiated an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the properties from Agriculture to Low Density Residential and then to rezone the properties from A-I (Agriculture) to R-l (Low Density Residential). The purpose of the rezone is a prerequisite of the Metropolitan Council to extend City services to properly zoned properties. City sanitary services will be extended to the properties during the reconstruction of County Road 72, residents are currently connected to City water service. The properties were annexed into the City in November of 1995 and as part of the City's annexation ordinance were zoned A-I (Agriculture). City water service was extended to the . properties during the East Farmington project when de-watering the site dried up the private wells in that area. The sanitary sewer service is proposed to be extended from the west to serve those residents, all of who have individual septic systems; those systems would eventually be abandoned. The proposed R-l (Low Density) zoning district will continue the zoning of the adjacent properties (Trinity Hospital and the Farmington Clinic) to the south. The minimum single-family lot size requirement within the R-l (Low-Density) district is 10,000 square feet; all of the current lots meet the minimum requirement. The Planning Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval for the Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning at the April 13, 1999 Planning Commission meeting. There was no public testimony from affected residents. . ACTION REQUESTED 1. Adopt the attached resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan of subject properties from Agriculture to Low Density Residential subject to Metropolitan Council approval. 2. Adopt ordinance rezoning subject properties from A-I (Agriculture) to R-I (Low Density Residential) subject to Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Michael Schultz Associate Planner C/) Q) 1: Q) a. o ~ a.. "'Co. Q) CO ~~ C Q) 0 C/).- .... c CO ::>u ....0 Q)--.J Q) ~ .... C/) ..c .... C") ~ N Cii 0) 0) .. N tIl III u. c: >- 0- o~ Q) a 0 '- '" .iij .... t u N .5 ~('(l ('(l C1> m is ('(l -g ~ 0- r- '" g> "t:l ~- e .c CO~a. C") z.~ c: '" ~.CO.... ... II a: O~ ('(l <.> C1> >- m '" CO en a. .~ Q) ('(l a 0 ~:> ~ -g '- <.> >- <( ;;: en .D ()~()en '0 (ij ~ <:~D '" .. - u 0 I-- a '" N r I II) : [[llI] ITDIJ t:1ll U Q) E I ~ I I I I \ 0 .c: ~ : I~~ f---- l- f--- f---- ~ f---- l- f--- /. ~ I I I I I I I \ l\] I I :::s 0- C/) I I 1\ - 0 ..... I I l17 \ II) 0;;:: m I ! ... '< ......--. ~ f---- , I \ I ~I I I \ I- \ en I 1- [-- .::r: c---- \ I- i~ II) -- .M --- \ I ,,- Q) N .~ ~ \ E N 0 r- e i- \ .c: I t:: 0 (ij '-- \ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ \ 0::: g. I ~ l ~ 0 f---- \ Q) I- J:: oS z .c f---- -I , t:: :) :t::: f---- \ ~ 0 ~ , (!) 0 l- I \ ~ l- I , I \ :::s flo---- - ..... I , :::s I \ u. II I \ L I c---- \ r- I n l , ! ." ~ 11\ M 3^V 31VON3ddIH~/~ AMH )lNncl! I rn~ ~~ ~~ I I 1 l- I-- I-- I-- en en en en w z ~ ~ Z <( --l ~ <( a.. ~ UJ 0 I I tI) Q) . ,..-4 t:: Q) ~ o ~ ~ N t'- ~ ~ € ;::s o U -- ti gf . ,..-4 s::: o N s::: o bo s::: . ,..-4 ~ ~ ~ o ,0 . ,..-4 U i1 a '" e = ~ "0 ; :: ;: .. ii ~ w~~~ ~ Q t ~ "'11~~. ~ ~ ~ jj~~l~h~~ !f~t~ ~ ~ ~]]~~~;~~~]Q.aQ.8 1 1ii,.1ii,.~! > l!!'g-g ~'" Ii .~.1l ~<I<<~~18&&~I~]JI~ ~~~9~9~~~~~~~s~~~~ w ~~!~~eee~sss6g~~~l~~ <<JDlDIIIIOOIODDDID~ 11" aliH sHoO! un.. 1JUg Ji"jt 'a~ia.s 11I=.;ll ~ iji~1 !i111t'1 4'U z l.ll.!!Q ~ . ILll ~i ~ ..1 00~ f!!l- : ((v E31~B 13 I lPCJ ~ ~ ~ : ~\rnrro ' J ~,~ ~ ~!~ .~/i;>>. .e!'. ;~, ..i: I I " .~ j: u: ~ ! ~ L- I ~. 1 - - T I I I ~ z.~ ~ ..,~ J ~ I ~ T ~ :.i I II l [ II l L . . DTI-lQT - I.iS H.LL L lL I~ L-- - - ~ l I I .is H.i9 ~ - G) ~ o '" r-- o o '" u ]0 00'" N o o '" N - RESOLUTION NO. AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COUNTY ROAD 72 PROPERTIES - NORTH SIDE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 1951 day of April, 1999 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member _ seconded the following: WHEREAS, a public hearing to review the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the properties located on the north side of County Road 72 and located within the City of Farmington was held on the 13th of April, 1999 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and proper notice sent to surrounding property owners; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended favorable action by the Council with certain conditions after receiving and evaluating comments from various parties; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a public hearing held on April 13, 1999, recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the properties located on the north side of County Road 72 from Agriculture to Low Density Residential contingent upon the following; 1. Subject to Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Farmington hereby amends the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the properties located on the north side of County Road 72, as collective properties are legally described on Exhibit A, and located within the City of Farmington from Agriculture to Low-Density Residential. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 19th day of April, 1999. Mayor Attested to the _ day of April, 1999. City Administrator CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance Rezoning the Properties found north of County Road 72 and located within the City of Farmington from A-I to R-l. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City Council approved a petition to rezone the Properties on the north side of County Road 72 and found within the City of Farmington on the 19th day of April, 1999 from A-I to R-l; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a public hearing held on April 13, 1999, recommended approval of the rezoning from A-I to R-l contingent on the following: 1. Approval of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan from Agriculture to Low Density Residential; and 2. Subject to Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Farmington hereby amends the City Zoning Ordinance rezoning the properties on the north side of County Road 72, as collective properties are legally described on Exhibit A, and located within the City of Farmington from A-I to R-l. Enacted and ordained on the _ day of April, 1999. SEAL CITY OF FARMINGTON MAYOR ATTEST: CITY ADMINISTRATOR Approved as to form the _ day of , 1999. CITY ATTORNEY Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,1999. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: City Planning Commission FROM: Michael Schultz I)fJ SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning, Properties on North side of County Road 72 DATE: April 13, 1999 INTRODUCTION The City is proposing to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Rezone seven (7) properties located on the north side of County Road 72 from the current Agriculture land use to a Residential land use. DISCUSSION The subject properties located along County Road 72 were annexed into the City on November 6, 1995 as an A-I Zoning District, following section 10-2-7: (B) of the City Code, requiring annexed areas be classified A-I until the City Council rezones the property to an appropriate classification. The five (5) homes (5 residences and 7 parcels) were annexed at that time partly in due to failing well systems. The City agreed to connect them to City water however, the homes though are still currently on individual septic systems. The County Road 72 road project will extend sewer service to the west to serve these residents with City sewer and eventually abandon their individual septic systems. Because these homes are proposed to be connected to City sanitary sewer, the Metropolitan Council requires that the properties meet the required zoning classifications for sanitary improvements and be included in the MUSA. City Staff thus proposes that the properties be amended from the existing Agriculture land use on the Comprehensive Plan (reference current Comprehensive Plan map) to Low Density residential and also the properties be rezoned from the existing A-I (Agriculture) zoning district to R-I (Low Density Residential). These amendments would fulfill the requirements of the Metropolitan Council to connect to sanitary sewer. The existing zoning surrounding the subject properties is R-3 and B-1 to the north; R-3 to the east; R-I and R-2 (PUD) to the south and R-2 to the west. It should be noted that the properties are interrupted by the City boundary line in which two parcels are still located within Empire Township (see map). The subject parcels total an area of 3.75 acres (excluding right-of-way). ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends amending the Comprehensive Plan from Agriculture to Low Density Residential and rezoning the subject properties from A-I (Agriculture) to R-I (Low Density Residential) and forward the recommendation on to the City Council. Michael Schultz Associate Planner / /a.. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~ FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - County Road 72 Project DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION The plans and specifications have been prepared for the County Road 72 project. DISCUSSION At the February 16, 1999 City Council meeting, the City Council ordered the improvements for the County Road 72 project and authorized the preparation of plans and specifications. Dakota County has included this project in their CIP as a turn back project. The County has indicated that they would participate financially in the County Road 72 street improvement project within the City limits as part of the turn back agreement. Dakota County's financial participation would be according to the County's current policies. The project has two parts; a reconstruction part and a new construction part. Reconstruction The reconstruction part encompasses the existing roadway from Trunk Highway 3 to the easterly Hospital property line (Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 13+65). The proposed improvements for this section include: 1) reconstruction of the roadway, 2) installation of storm sewer, 3) installation of sanitary sewer and 4) installation of water services. The installation of sanitary sewer and water services are for the benefit of properties on the north side of Co. Rd. 72 since the Hospital and Clinic currently have sewer and water service. The properties in the Township on the north side of the road would have both sewer and water services stubbed to them. Several of the properties in the City on the north side of the road have already had water service installed and those properties would only need sewer service stubbed at this time. Those properties in the City that have neither water nor sewer service would have both stubbed to them. New Construction The new construction part is in the area of the existing gravel roadway located between the easterly Hospital property line and the easterly City limits (Sta. 13+65 to Sta. 33+00). The proposed improvements include roadway construction along with storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water main and related costs. These improvements are for the benefit of the Hospital property and East Farmington on the south side and Bristol Square on the north side. Project Issues Bike Path At the public hearing on the project, Council directed staff to include the bike path on the north side of the road as an alternate in the project proposal. The bike path costs have been separated out in the proposal and the bike path can be eliminated if Council so chooses. Sanitary Sewer During the design of the proj ect, the issue of future development to the east of the Prairie Waterway was taken into consideration in the design of the sanitary sewer. In the initial feasibility report, the sanitary sewer was not assumed to serve any properties to the east of the Prairie Waterway. Upon further review, it has been determined that by keeping the sanitary sewer deep to the east of the existing trunk sewer line and installing a larger pipe, approximately 100 - 200 acres of future development could be served to the east of the Prairie Waterway. The estimated additional construction cost (which would be a trunk cost funded from the Sanitary Sewer Fund) to upsize the sewer and install it at the maximum depth is approximately $ 32,000. It is staffs opinion, based on discussions with property owners and developers, that portions of the land east of the Prairie Waterway are likely to come into the City at some time. Therefore, it is recommended that the project include the oversizing and extra depth for the sanitary sewer. Again, the costs associated with oversizing the pipe would not be assessed against existing properties served, but would be funded through the Sanitary Sewer Fund as a trunk line improvement. Road Alignment The design of the road will include a "L" intersection at the east end of County Road 72 by the Prairie Waterway, thus eliminating the existing curve. The construction of a "L" intersection will address current safety issues and will result in cost savings in the futureowhen the roadway is extended to the east. Hospital Access As of the writing of this memo, staff is continuing to coordinate with Trinity Hospital regarding the possible reconfiguration of the Hospital's access to County Road 72. The final resolution with the Hospital will be incorporated into the plans. BUDGET IMP ACT The estimated total project cost (excluding the trunk sanitary sewer) is $1,474,200. As stated previously, it has been indicated by the County, that the County would be willing to participate in the costs of the improvements as outlined in their Transportation Policy as part of a turn back agreement with the City. The remaining costs would be funded through appropriate City funding mechanisms as outlined in previous communications to Council. The total estimated project costs associated with the trunk sanitary sewer is $44,800. The trunk sanitary sewer costs would be funded from the Sanitary Sewer Fund. Staff has contacted the County Engineer and he has indicated that the turn back agreement will be taken before the County Board for approval on May 4th, 1999. Bids for the froject will be taken on May 13th, 1999 with possible award scheduled for the May 17 , 1999, City Council meeting. If the County Board were to delay the approval of the turn back agreement, the Council would have the option of delaying the award of contract. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution approving the plans and specifications for the County Road 72 project and authorizing the advertisement for bids. Respectfully submitted, ~m~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file Proposed RESOLUTION NO. -99 APPROVE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS PROJECT 99-08, COUNTY ROAD 72 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 19th day of April, 1999 at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R13-99, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the following proposed improvement: Proiect No. 99-08 Descriotion Street & Utility Improvements Location County Road 72, from TII 3 easterly to where it turns north at the Prairie Waterway and northerly to the City limits ;and WHEREAS, such plans and specifications are now before the Council for its consideration. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. Said plans and specifications are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the Farmington Independent and the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened for consideration by the Council at 2:00 p.m. on the 13th day of May 1999 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the Clerk for 5% ofthe amount of each bid. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 19th day of April, 1999. Mayor Attested to the 19th day of April, 1999. SEAL Clerk! Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us lib TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator~ FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - Prairie Creek Storm Sewer Upgrade Project DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION The plans and specifications have been prepared for the Prairie Creek Storm Sewer Upgrade project. DISCUSSION At the March 1 S\ 1999 City Council meeting, the Council accepted the feasibility report for the proposed Prairie Creek storm sewer improvements. The improvements proposed would improve areas with poor drainage and bring the storm sewer system up to City standards. Proposed Improvements There are two parts to the proposed improvements. The first part includes the reconstruction of the storm sewer system in the 3rd and 4th Additions that will bring the subject storm sewer system up to City standards. The second part involves the upgrade of the outlet to Pond A V -PI. 8 as identified in the City's Surface Water Management Plan. The homes adjacent to this pond currently have no freeboard protection from the 100-year high water level of the pond. This pond is currently connected to Lake Julia by two culverts under Embers Avenue. To provide one-foot of freeboard protection, as required by the City's SWMP, additional culverts need to be installed in order to lower the current 100-year high water level of the pond. Optional Improvements in the 4th Addition The feasibility report identified optional improvements in the 4th Addition. As directed by Council, staff has further evaluated these optional improvements, as they were not recommended to be included in the project. Upon further review, staff recommends that the optional improvements not be included in the project. The costs (estimated at $82,000) and significant disruption to the existing backyards are not justified by the minimal changes to the ponds that the optional improvements would achieve. Based on the computer model, the optional improvements would lower the high water level (IOO-year storm) of the ponds less than a half a foot. During smaller storms which are more typical, the effect of the optional improvements on the ponds would be even less. As indicated previously, the homes surrounding the ponds in this area have adequate flood protection as required by the City's Surface Water Management Plan and the storm sewer system in this area does meet the City's minimum design standards. BUDGET IMPACT The total estimated project cost is $570,000. The project costs would be funded from the Storm Water fund. The Finance director has indicated that the fund balance in the Storm Water fund is sufficient to underwrite the cost of these improvements and the City would not need to bond for the improvements. The Storm Water fund is composed of funds collected from Storm Water Utility charges and Storm Water Area charges. The Storm Water utility was instituted to fund maintenance and construction of storm sewers. The costs for the proposed improvements to the outlet for Pond A V-P1.8 are included in the City's Surface Water Management Plan and therefore are funded through the Storm Water Area charges. Due to the nature of the circumstances that have necessitated this project, staff will continue to explore all cost recovery options. ACTION REOUESTED Adopt the attached resolution ordering the project, approving the plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for bids for the Prairie Creek Storm Sewer Upgrade project. Respectfully submitted, ';krn~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file Prairie Creek Citizen petitioners Proposed RESOLUTION NO. -99 ORDERING THE PROJECT APPROVING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS PROJECT 99-10, PRAIRIE CREEK STORM SEWER UPGRADE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council ofthe City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 19th day of April, 1999 at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R21-99, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the following proposed improvement: Proiect No. 99-10 Description Prairie Creek Storm Sewer, Street and Sanitary Sewer improvements Location Prairie Creek 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions ; and WHEREAS, such plans and specifications are now before the Council for its consideration. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted the 1 st day of March 1999. 2. Said plans and specifications are hereby approved. 3. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the Farmington Independent and the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened for consideration by the Council at 2:30 p.m. on the 13th day of May 1999 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the Clerk for 5% of the amount of each bid. This resolution adopted by recorded vote ofthe Farmington City Council in ope!l session on the 19th day of April, 1999. Mayor Attested to the 19th day of April, 1999. SEAL Clerk! Administrator / /i' / ./ - Pc~ ,>7) Petition for Resolution of Draina2:e Issues Prairie Creek Third Edition West Side of Embers Avenue - Lots 15 - 24 The following is a petition for a feasibility study to be conducted by the City of Farmington in an effort to resolve the drainage issues impacting lots 15 - 24 in the Third Edition of Prairie Creek. Background information and further details are attached. -\ e ve- 5 SO>1.eS (!'ha) r1 qa1f. 5-1e v~ iijP5 ,-' j{e ,J..h ~et'l:xcJ; ..-<' l"""e5 :)0. '. ~ 11(19 \ r1 v.- . o~J(:~U7~ S~lil+hJ . 1: l' (Y' ; ~ ---r;;, ]A (\ L.ll ~ '50--0(..1 .' /' to it~"" P (7lli-' rjllrih7: yr"'" u - Phone # Address Lot# 7"'0 -.2. n J /fj7C.S" ~IH 6.c/'s ~V~ /S 46D-fl;:JSC(_ 1811'{ fHPe~~ ~L 1(0 Y 6:0 d..-6/Y /?) ~ S p/')g~,,:c::- .lh&-"") i '/ vtt 637:}. /8Bdl {~bt~'S I1Ue. (7 "Ie Y l..-"? - \0 7 So 7 \ g<~1V ? 'C v,,", c?dZ S A-iJ E ci d-- 2..4 d\ Yb)-7J~Clo 'f U) - b s-JOf I '6 ~11 (i1,V( i';f (5 Avl. 1<36 '--(Of 13;1.16if (l S IN E= Clb"S'd-//3 1~.gJS 8f\".\~iSfZ~ f;,J/Y 0 {> City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us /~a- TO: Mayor and Councilmembers City Administrat~;#.it, FROM: David L. Olson Community Development Director SUBJECT: Review of Chapter 1306 of the State Building Code / Special Fire Protection Systems DATE: April 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION The City Council adopted an ordinance in May of 1996 entitled Minnesota Rule 1306 which specifies requirements for the installation of special fire protection systems, (sprinkler systems) in new, or expanded buildings containing 2000 square feet or more of certain types of occupancy. The following discussion is an effort to summarize the effect or impact of enforcement of this ordinance. DISCUSSION The attached ordinance that was adopted in 1996 included adoption of revisions of the general Minnesota State Building Code and also included adoption of optional provisions included in Minnesota Rule (MR) 1306. MR 1306 Version 8 deals with Special Fire Protection Systems for Groups M, S, or F occupancies with 2,000 or more gross square feet (copy enclosed). A description of the M (Mercantile), S (Storage), and F (Factory) type occupancies is also included. According to one State Building Code official, the intent of this optional provision is to provide a means. for communities with extended or prolonged fire response times to have buildings protected with on-site fire protection systems. The primary purpose of MR 1306 is to require that sprinkler systems be installed in new buildings, buildings with expanded floor area, and buildings which have changes in occupancy that are 2000 square feet or greater within the three occupancy categories listed above. The other aspect of this special optional provlSlon is that in the case of expanded buildings or a building in which the occupancy category is changed, it retroactively applies to the existing portion of the existing building that is not being changed. MR 1306 is intended to require existing buildings with M, S, and F occupancies to be retrofitted with automatic sprinkler systems. The counterpoint to this issue, however, is that this provision can act as a disincentive to building owners who desire to expand or upgrade their existing buildings because of the costs associated with retrofitting existing buildings with sprinkler systems. In the past year there have been several proposed projects in Farmington that were impacted by this requirement. To date, none of these proposed expansions have occurred. Staff conversations with building owners and developers suggest that MR 1306 is a significant cost consideration and one of a number of important factors to be considered in facility expansions and renovations. Staff has prepared a survey of other cities in the area to determine how many other cities have adopted this optional provision. A comparison of the requirements of Minnesota Rule 1306 and standard State Building Code and Fire Code requirements has also been completed (attached). Finally, Community Development, Administration, and Fire Department staff have met several times to discuss the issues associated with MR 1306. The following analysis cites the advantages and disadvantages ofMR 1306. Advantages . Theoretically the intent of MR 1306 would result in existing commercial and industrial buildings eventually having sprinkler systems installed. . MR 1306 should result in reduced property losses caused by fire in sprinklered buildings when extended fire response times are experienced. . Should decrease the potential fire loss of existing buildings that are expanded or enlarged, or changed in occupancy by requiring retrofitted sprinkler systems. . Defers or delays the need for a full-time Fire Department as the City continually expands. . Reduces the potential for loss of life or injury to occupants and Fire Department personnel when existing or expanded buildings are sprinklered. . Reduced Fire Insurance premiums for the Building Owner . Reduces the overall cost of fire protection. . Simplifies Building Code and Fire Code enforcement. Disadvantages . MR 1306 can act as a disincentive to purchase and/or invest in the redevelopment of existing buildings that result in changes in building occupancies and/or expansion of existing commercial and industrial buildings in the City when other neighboring communities do not have similar requirements. . MR 1306 could result in the developer or building owner choosing to construct a free standing building, alongside the existing building, to circumvent the requirement of having to retrofit the existing facility. This option is already being considered by building owner to avoid MR 1306 requirements. . Relative to the potential circumvention of MR 1306, is public policy served through the avoidance of the City Code objectives. . It can result in remodeling or change of occupancies taking place without obtaining the necessary permits because of the special sprinkler requirements that will be triggered as a result. . It eliminates the ability of the building owner to consider other options such as the installation of additional hydrants and fire lanes around the perimeter of the building or the installation of standpipes in certain portions of the building rather than sprinklers throughout the building. In some cases a building owner may choose to install sprinklers rather than some of these other options, however, currently there are no options to the building owner but to install sprinklers. Without MR 1306, building owners will be subject to the aforementioned options/requirements. . Finally, if buildings are not redeveloped resulting in changed occupancies or expanded because of the requirement to install sprinklers, they may possibly be allowed to deteriorate in condition and/or decline in value. In that instance, not only has the original objective of the ordinance not been met, but the economic base of the City may be negatively impacted and the individual buildings possibly become greater fire risks. BUDGET IMPACT None ACTION REQUESTED If the Council wishes to have a more in-depth discussion of this issue, it is recommended that a Council Workshop be scheduled. Two possible dates that are recommended would be Tuesday, May 11, 1999 or Tuesday, May 25, 1999. Respectfully submitted, ~~ David L. Olson Community Development Director cc: Ken Kuchera, Fire Chief #7 b / /7?~ s. Consent Agenda MOTZON by Ristow, second by Gamer to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approve Minutes of April 29th (two special meetings) and May 6th (regular meeting) b) Set public hearing for June 3, 1996 for Ames construction Mineral Extraction Permit c) Receive update on Excelsior Henderson Motorcycle Company relocation. -e.) Adopt ORDDfANC3 NO. 096-373 amending the City's Building Code ordinance by adding the Minnesota State Building Code amendments through March 20, 1995. e) Approve the installation of a stop sign on Egret Avenue at lSSth Street. f) Approve the capital outlay request to purchase three hundred 60 gallon solid waste containers. g) Approve payment of the bills as submitted. h) Approve Change Order #1 for Project 93-14 (Wausau Alignment of Southeast Area Stormwater Management Project) - reconfiguration of stormwater pipe. i) Approve the capital outlay request to purchase computer upgrades for Engineering. APZl!', KOTZON CARlUED. 6. Administrator Erar introduced Donajo Heikes, Assistant City Engineer, to the Councilmembers. Councilmembers welcomed Ms. Heikes to the City'S staff. 7. Exchange Bank Building (Item Sc) and Senior Center Coordinator Funding (Item Sd) Member Ristow stated he had pulled these items in order to thank staff for the work they had invested in working on the successful outcome of these matters. - MOTZON by Gamer, second by Ristow to acknowledge the receipt of information on the Exchange Bank Building and to approve the funding plan for the Senior Center Coordinator position. APZl!', KOTZON CARRIED. 8. Continuation of public Hearing - Hickory Street Name Change Police Chief Siebenaler stated that the concerns brought forward at the May 6, 1996 public hearing had been addressed. A letter from Clyde Thompson, the developer of westview Townhomes, had been received stating he had not yet turned over control of Townhome Association to homeowners yet, and that he was in favor of changing the townhome street name to Hickory Court. Since this is a privately owned street, Mr. Thompson's approval was necessary to make the change. KOTZON by Ristow, second by Gamer to close the public hearing. APZJ', KOTZON CARRZED. KOTZON by Ristow, second by Gamer to change the name of the private street in Westview Townhome Addition to Hickory Court. APZl!', MOTZON CARRZBD . 9. Telecommunication System Administrator Erar and Administrative Assistant Finstuen briefed the Council on information received on Frontier Communication's Centrex telephone system. Ms. Finstuen noted that several neighboring communities used the system and were pleased with its performance. KOTZON by Kuchera, second by Gamer to approve the purchase of the Centrex telephone and voice mail system and the / PRO P 0 SED CJ:TY OF FARHJ:NGTON DAKOTA COtJ'NTY, KJ:NNESOTA ORD:INANCE An Ordinance Amending the City Building Code Relating to the Adoption of the ~.sota State Building Code THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTJ:ON I: Title 4, Chapter ~, Sections ~, 2 and G of the Farmington City Code are hereby amended by adding (undeT1 ined) and deleting (au1:1elt) as follows: 4-1-1: Adoption of Building Code: The Minnesota State Building code, established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1GB.59 through 1GB.;] 1GB 75, as may be amended, is hereby adopted as the. Building Code of the City. The Building Code is hereby incorcoTated ;n this ordinance as if ful1v set out herein A copy of the Building Code is on file in the office of the City Clerk. This ordinance provides for the anpl;cation. administration and enforcement of the Minnesota State Building Code by ~:~~:~i~a ~:~.:~:~~i~n. con~truction. enlarae~ent: alteratio~. repaiT. moving. _ .. de___1_____ _onveTs1on. occupancy e~1pment. use he1aht area and m;~~~~~~n~~ of a1l buildings and/or structures in the City of Farmington. 4-1-2: Adoption of optional provisions: The City adopts by reference the following appendices, standards and supplements referenced in the Minnesota State Building Code: A) Appendix ~ ~ of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). B) ~~~eRaiJ: 32 ~f tae UBifa~ B~ile~R! Caee (UEC) Minnesota Rule 1306. Special Elr~ E~Qtect1on Systems w1th Opt1on 8 (Gro~ M. S or F occupancies with 2.000 or~ more aross squaTe feet. C) .h~~eRei:'Jt 3S af ~:ae 'gRifeFm B~ileiR! Ceee (UEC). 4-1-6: Enforcement: Enforcement of the prov~s1ons of this Chapter shall be the responsibility of the Building IRs~eeser Official who shall be appointed by the City Council. SECTJ:ON J:I: After adoption, signing and attestation this ordinance shall be published one time in the official newspaper of the City and shall be in effect on and after the date of such publication. Enacted and ordained the 20th day of May, 1996. . CIIAP'l'ER 13 0 6 DEPARTMEH'l' OP ADMINISTRATION MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE SPECIAL PlRE PRa.rBCTION SYSTPJm 1306.0100 SPECIAL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (OPTIONAL). /;~~"">- , . . 1306.0100 SPECIAL PIRE PRa.rBCTIOR SYSTEMS (OPTIONAL). Subpart 1. General. This part authorizes optional provisions for the installation of on-premises fire suppression systems in new buildings, buildings increased in floor area, and buildings which have the occupancy classification changed. Subp. 2. Municipal option. The sprinkler system reqUirements~' subpart 3 may be adopted with the selection of either item '8" or item "8a" based on local fire suppression capabilities, ut without further change by a municipality which has adopted the code. When adopted, the requirements are applicable throughout the municipality for new buildings, buildings increased in floor area, and buildings which will have the occupancy classification changed. Subp. 3. Requirements. Automatic sprinkler systems must be installed and maintained in operable condition in buildings in the occupancy classifications listed in items 1 through 11. For purposes of this chapter, area separation walls do not establish separate buildings. The square footage requirements stated in the following items establish the threshold where the provisions apply: in the case of mixed occupancies the threshold number of the most restrictive occupancy applies to the entire building, except for minor additions that do not increase the occupant load or significantly increase the fire load. 1. Group A-l occupancies. 2. Group A-2 occupancies with an occupant load of 300 or more. 3. Group A-2.l occupancies. 4. Group A-3 occupancies with an accumulative occupant load of 300 or more. 5. Group S-3 service stations with 3,000 or more gross square feet of floor area, not including canopies. 6. Group S-3 parking garages with 5,000 or more gross square feet of floor area. 7. Group B offices and postsecondary classrooms with 8,500 or more gross feet of floor area or three or more stories in he~t. ~ Group M mercantile, S storage, or F factory occupancies with 2,000 or more gross square feet of floor area or three or more stories in height. 8a. Group M mercantile, S storage, or F factory occupancies with 5,000 or more gross square feet of floor area or three or more stories in height. 9. Group E-l and E-2 occupancies with 8,500 or more gross ..... . 132 . square feet of floor area or two or more stories in height. 10. Group E-3 occupancies with an occupant load of 30 or more. 11. Group R-l apartment houses, hotels, and motels with 8.,500 or more gross square feet of floor area or with dwelling units or guest rooms on three or more floors. Subp. 4. Standard. Automatic sprinkler systems must comply with the applicable standard referenced in UBe Section 904. When a public water supply is not available, an alternate on-site source of water supply which meets with the approval of the building official and fire chief shall be provided. Subp. 5. Substitute construction. The installation of an automatic sprinkler system as required by this chapter does not preclude the substitution of one-hour fire-resistive construction as permitted in use Section 508. SA: MS s l6B.6l HIST: 19 SR 1340 HOTB: This part is effective March 19. 1995. 133 . .... ",.-. . . Minnesota Building Code Chapter 1306 Survey - Fire Protection Systems City Did You Adopt Chapter Version 8 or 8a? 1306? Lakeville No Rosemount Yes 8a Prior Lake Yes 8 Apple Valley No Chaska Yes 8 Eagan No Inver Grove Hts Yes 8 Mendota Heights Yes 8 Savage No Faribault No Vadnais Heights Considering Adoption of 8a Version 8 Farmington Yes 8 8 - Group M mercantile, S storage, or F factory occupancies with 2,000 or more square feet of floor area or three or more stories in height. 8a - Group M mercantile, S storage, or F factory occupancies with 5,000 or more square feet of floor area or three or more stories in height. Created on 03/02/992:00 PM\\FARM]Sl\COMMDEV\build\Chapter 1306 Survey. doc .! .0 CD I or; 'Oc:- C") 0 01"'0 o I/) .r.5: ~ CJ) lB~~.s ~ 0....0.0" N ~0 g.~ ~ .5: .2 ~ c: .!!l :0 0 ~ ~ 5.~:t 1:: ~ al .0 "C ~ .(3 c: [-8 I .!! 0 B .> I/) CD~I/) e -8 = ~.5: 0. o"-:JalCD U ol/)E.c CD.... c: l;;....- .2 - "" al U:::t:1UC:or; ..... o:tall/) CJ) 0. al ~ ~ ..,; CJ) >- E 5 &;:: .~ .... c: l:: .... ... alo"C""U ./::>-~CD ~ - or;.s or; or; 0 CD 0"- ~~~~~ =: r::T I/) o o o I() A I/) - c: CD E or; .!!l :0 S I/) ~ CD CD 01 :s2 c: .5: :i2 .... c: 0. .C eno CJ)....~ c: CD ,E alen-g or; c: CD u.2 E '13<( UCDCD co-_ ::J e al .....a.(i5 ~ .~ "C ....u..{ij I/) - c: E"C CD CD~ E 0m .S ~ 0c: O"u CD :0:; lD .; c:: al - .0 co E~_ o 0.- I/) C")"Sa:J ....<(CI)E I/) CD .0 c: al 0. :J 8 o .... <i: 0. :J e C> c: B 1Ue;- =a. I/) al:C; ~ .... al 0 .... c: o 0 0:0:; q:;:c 'O:E =: ~ 0".... I/) 0 0""1/) 0"C:2 0.:20 N:Je- .... CD :J A.oo. .... .e~~:>. .!!lE -g'G~{ij~ ~.! "'O.!!:E6;;;a>:C;~ 0>0 ~~~~""'5 ~ .... CD :> .- L.- &;:: .0 CD 0. 6i 6 .0 .s E !!:: :s2 CD ~I/)o c: .0 '0 .s CD 0.... .t: i oc .5: -.... 1/)0. m5 :5&;::0= or; .- i_CD It) '8 ~ 1/)t:>o:5....E&;:: I/) 0 0 c: c: "'0 o.E 00 al a>.2 alal :e=:5.c1U e66&.ea>>-E I/)Cl"C :>6alo 1/)c:.!:>.....E~"S ~:;:;Uc:.l2 .al u""2al"'"c1/) :E0~i~;~ .a .8C::tc:o~~ al....~ c:al- :t _1/)1/) ~.o lD.2 0.- :J"C 0.~=:13 Cl1U.! al ~al.- 5 c:.... U ~CD~~:e:g~~ u::: 6i ~ .5 &'..s fi a. .... o ~ Q) .0 CD U al 0. I/) CD :0 al I/) :J "C CD I/) o c:s c: W .... N <i: N' <i: 0. :J e 01 05: >- al ~ .m :1 Q)M ~<i: .... .! al CD or; - I :;:: :; E 01 c: .c S c: o U I/) 01 c: :2 .S co {ij '0 } i II) CD.2 . CD ~ ~ 0(312 ~o {ij :J {ij E o.E0.6 8888 OalOC") I/) CD 00 c: al 0. :J 8 o N <i: 0. :J e C!> iii CD ~ a. E 8 - c: CD E :2"C :J ~ E 0 al- _ .c c: 0 CD E E"C .5: c: E al CD ~ 0. 0- >-;g ~..s E"C CD~ 0m :>.- en~ ~ .... .- ... CD CD e:s2.c o .5: 0 - .... :J ~~E al or; - .i lB ~ {ij .0 0" c: c: I/) :E ~o _ a &.i u.... I/) o A m <( -g to .5: al "C lB;r :2 01 A 0 S:E g en 01 CD ~~~ I CD .::,e. o E ~ I/) ._ - Oal c: CD .c I/) .- >- al_ -.0 5 E U CD i)'lZ c: al al"C 0. CD :J- 8 ~ 00 <i:a E"C CD~ i]i oCl)~ == as -; e:s2.c o .5: 0 - .... :J ~~E I/) CD .0 c: al 0. :J o o o .... ~ 0. :J e C!> ~ ij ~~ ~ c: al 0. :J 8 o c: al :5 Oi - I/) lZ CDJ2 .g U alo 0.0 a o. u.... o A <i:"C ~ ~ - 0 - c: CD E Ii cI> '0 .c: c: c: U 0 ~ U~<( mo~ :> ... CO r--a..(;5 O)e'O 0) .- c: T"LLCO ('I') o CJ) olS N o CJ) CD '0 ~ o CD '0 o () e u: r-- CJ) CJ) ..... o 'E:6 CD 'i E 0 'S CD 0- '6 CD c: 0::: co co Co o :J CO) 8 .....0 '0 ~'O ; co ~.QcD :J i)' ... ~ c: ~ 8 co ... cog.o c:Rg CO 0('1') ~ '6 c: co 0. :J 8 o CO) <i: 0. :J e (!) ~ 'ij) ~ _c:- 000>"0 o ..: ,5 e ~ $ ~'S 0...0.0- ~'0g.e .5,g~c: ::c 0 CD .!I! :J CD -S ~ 0.- ;;> ~. co i '0 '6 c: o.~ .!o~.> CD~0e :6 ~ ,5 0. -0 :J co CD 0E.o c: ... ... .Q~"'lii t::coC:.c: o ~ co 0 0. CO oS e -.~' >- C:1i: [ijg~'O"fi c: .t: >- e CD CD - .c: 'S .c: .c: 0 CD c:r- ~~~e~ iii - c: CD E e 'S c:r e o Ii: '6 CD 0. o o Z cD rn a:g 'O:;o.c: e.ol;:::6 CD 0'0 32,~='i c: ... 'i: .9 g ""t Co 0 T" 0...0_ c!::JO= o.g~a ~VN ';;; ~ c: -; CD '6 ~ 0 o.c:_CO 'Q.co"'u '0 0. ~ c: :J CO cU CO 8 e e Ci5 0 0> CO ~i '0,19 >-0 o CI) c: i: ~ -; E32,O o .5 '0 - ... :J ~~E e o ai ~ E e ~"'ocoo> cooS"'C: '0oq:::Sui CDO_:JCD oC"'io'O'Q. '~.c:=~ 0 c71jggB o CD '6 c: CO 0. :J 8 o CO) I rn 0. :J e (!) .e~~~Q) ,!I!E i=.5~:6 o~ "0 0 ~ 0 '''05 !e .- CO;J l!:: Q) ..... e~'i~~d:~ ~ 0. CD a '6 .9 E l!:: 32 CD >Q) 0 .! 0 0 '0 .5 .0 -CDeol::Q)'" 15 '0 .5 .c: Ii: ~ !E g. .c: oc: i =0 .c:Q) ... "8 lP o > .....E~ ~:e:oc:=c: ~&.E~~~~~ "'aaollP>-E o '0 0. ;;> (5 CO 0 ~,~~ ~.Q E::E:; 8'02'" CO"''O iii ~ co'S-li5~~~co 0.o~.c:Q)~O.c: .;.i-8~[ij.2~j ~=... 5- 0 0'0 o.~ Q); o'-.a Q) 0..... ifij ,g c: g> CO U CO ~ '0 0 .- l;; Q) ~: CD 0 .- '0 ... e Q) ...._t::= 0.15 u: a; ~ ,5 &'.s g. a E'O Q)~ '0j >-0 ornc: ~ CD -; E32.o 0'2 '0 - :J ~~E CO) I rn o CO Q) E CO rn e o 0 8,E ea'O COo=..; OOo-'v g>q0e .,.., 1.0 0 CO oX:.c:0'" ~:t:eS a.. ~ 0> q:: o Q) 0> e CO (!) 0> c: 32 ... CO a.. CO) I rn Co :J e (!) Ei CD_ '0j ~~ o ... ,_ 16 CD CD E32,O .9 '2 '0 .3 Co :JE ....CI) .! '0 a> , .c -c- o 0 0'1 "0 S 1/)...:.5 ~ (J) m m ~'S ~o~o.tT N ~Ui g.~ 0.5g~c (J) ..coa> ~.!!!5.~} t:: ~ to ..c "0 ~ 'u C ~~ I J!! 0 ~ 'S; m a> ~ I/) e "0 :5 2:.5 0. 0_;:, to a> UOI/)E..c lDCllt"O - .2'" 1U U:~roc.c ......o~tOl/) (J) o.tOS~....: (J) >- C l;: a> ......cE~"o:E to 0"0 a> 0 5S~~'3~ .cO a> tT- ::~~~~ (J)C:S C a> E to en "0 .!i .cc5i5i UOEE I ~ <( e U .! a> .- III e ro g. ~a.Ci5 ~ (J) a> "0 0 (J)~ l;: ...... u: fa 'u a> 0. I/) o Z "0 ~ ^ cD a> - I/) :i2.5 . 0 C m.c .t: m ~ .r:. fE.t: to - C .9 C5 .~ 01/)0 c:;::~ .5 J2 0 mV~:: 0.1/)1/)0 '0. 0'1 0 = "0 .5 0 I/) C"Oo I/) s= .to en.5~O I/) - C I/) ~ a> I/) 0 E e C").5 '5 0'1 C5 m tT = .t: a> ~ to 0 rx: C;; ~ - COO to I/) 00C5~ cr>qoo ......Nl;:E ...; .c 0'1 'ii) .c en 0. ;:, e " ~ '" .! J2 1: >- .!!! E '0 a> ~_ca> a> ':5 "O=ctO.c C'l_'Oc ~ 'u .- ~ - "0.5 ~ .A 0 0'1 "0 . to:50!!:::",.__::;,:,,~...:.5~ S;_._~.., V'v'a>>- o :::.. ..- >...~ ;:, ~ CD '" - '5 ~ ~ ;> .- L.- - ..c a> 0 ~ 0. tT o.CI) C5'5~ E!!::::i2c ~Ui g.~ ..cCD~OJ!!_O"O 01/) _ 1/).1:: ",.t: C.-_ C O.5~~b&! 0.'-:0 0 CI) ~ "0:: Il):cl/).!!!;:,CI)} I/) Co CI) 0 CI)...... 0 ~ >..0.;::;: > :5 E l;: ~. to .... "0 I/):eoc C tOCI) "S! 0 E 0'0 to CD.~ 'u C 0."0 ,vo. =E :5..cro~~~'S; eC5C501Ue>-E CD-=:::'I/)e m 0)"0 0. ~ 0 ~.9 :5 2:.5 0. a>c.!~C5E ;:'-o;:,tOa> 0=0 o to';:: uito I/)E..c ~'S.5 C a>i I/) c.~ lii"01U 1/)..cI/)CI)xBa>tO~roc.c 3~8C} ~ o~:e ~~::~ to ._ C to - ~ to 'E .~ ._a> a= ~ o'O'!!! ~"O >-E to- 2:~~u 0'1- a> fa o-6j"fi ... ~ to .- C C ~ ts c.~ >- ~ a> 'v L.- "0 ,2 .- to a> - .c .- '" Cl)1/)_"00.- CD.O ;:,.c ..,CI)~'-~=o.e.c Cl)tT- iI: ~~.2.~.5 to o.::~~ e~ ui - C a> E e '5 tT CI) .... o l;: 'u CD 0. I/) o Z ~ _ 0 "0 ;:, 0 e..cl;: CD 1/)'0 :i2 CD C .t: = .t: .9 tT 0. I/) I/) I/) ~ 0 c;:,o 0.20. cvo .5 >- N I/) 0 C CD c to 0.~:5 '0. ;:, ~ "0 0 CI) co~ S 0 as en III I:>> E"O Cl)J2 UiS ~~ ~ ~ .- ... CI) CD e:i2..c .9 .5 (;) ~ ;:, ~~E ci;th8 ol/)L()'O 0. ~ as = -g ~:2 l'l tV tOtO~CI)CD.... I/)"OI/)~ 85EoE~ 1E0o 0 O~eC5~ , - I/) o I/) a. E "0 0 C e to I/) I/) I/) 8.!!! leU O~ III~ o.c ;:, 0 e l5 "en ~ J2~~~CI) .!!!E "0 = C to .c 0'1 .! "OCI).u'_~- .51/) to :5 0 !!::: CD "0 >- '-0> -'S: ~ ~.~ 'S ~ ~ ~ ;> .- L.- - ..c CD o.CI)(s'5.9E!!::::i2 CI)~0.e~e"O.5 ..c"'-CDI/)-CI)~ m'O.5.c~.o!E ft 'v "0 - "0 .cc -CDL()olD I/)OCDO.......... - > == El;: I/)=Eoc_c 0 "00 E.2 0 to CD.- ~o.~~=:5..cro ;;;C50~;e~E I/) 0'1 "2 >- ~ 0 ~ .9 ~C~ oE"::;;:' l:S =0 0 fa .;:: ui to to=2c_xCl)jl/)c ;:'-CD -CDto 1/)..cI/).cCl)~O 3~C8~c00:2 ~= ctO-to~ ...._~o-I/)I/) Q.~ CI);l 0'c,3i g.-1ii.~ Co C ~ts '"~ ~CDi'-:C to CD ea>~'c~=2:e u: ~ ~.2. &..5 to 0. cD I/) o .c or. - .~ ai m e to tOO E"O CD~ - - I/) to >-- 0C/)~ ;J CD -; ~:i2..c 0.5 (;) - ~ ;:, ~~E E.!!J ,! fii o E '" ~ "C ,.. VJ c: ..c: c: Q) (,) .2 E 'ts<{ (,),!Q) ~em ,,0..Ci) m~"C ~U:::ffi a> - .in a> , ..c: 06;'-0 ~ m of .~ .~ m ~ ~c.5- ~~ing-~ S2.E.Q~c "", :c 0 ..c:a> a> .~ :;, u ~ a..!!! ~ ~=Cll~"C .....uca.~ I J!! 0 B .> o a> ~ 0 e ~ =: ~.E a. O-O::JClla> (,) 0 E ..0 ~ 5 lD"C-a; U::::eia~ lJ; &. ~ J!} a> ~ m >- c~.~ ~aE~"C-5 o "C a> fii-=~.s~ ..c:O a> 0-- ~~~~~ Cll ... ~ 0 Cllg ls >- o ffi e c;:: c 0 ~o~ ....== ~ tr Cll ~ 0 C _:> 0 0 ;>0= ~qtr .u N 0 ~O C00 Cll-oO g-Q)-:- U~N Ou X ... a> 0 o 1::5 a> .~ E 0 ~ .5 .~ 0 truE a> c ... 0::: Cll 0 CD a. 0 g 88 ~ON o ~ 00"; ::E"5 o ....CD =o..c: tr Ct') .E o ... 0 o 0 a> o Cll .~ e~.9 aCll0 ~ :;:; C Cll U ... Q) ~ ~ a. ::J e C> .2 a>>- .~E "C~=:a~ C),! ~'G~"'- .E0 .>J!;!:t:: O!!::: a>~ ~ e~~~~~.5lD a. a> ls'i3.9 El!:::32 ~ a; .9 J!! ~ .g "C .2 __ca>~_ a> a. ;;; 0 .- .r:. q:: 0 It= 0 ,.. "C ... LO:o ~Coa>-oa>~oe > ..c: Eq:: ~:eoc::c m&.E~~~~~ elslsole>-E mg'i~...o~.9 g:otsa.gEuial Cll'5.5ca>i0C ~~~~~~g~ ~~8~a-Clll Cll.U'" o-.~ ~"C a.Clla>:;:;O....._a> a.-=UC....'Cll- Cll ~Cll.- o.E... u L.- a> i .- "C Cll ,! e a> ... .- 1:: = a. 0 u::: a;~.2.&..5 ~a ... a> - "C Cll cD a> ~ a> lD C) ... 32-Cll c ::J ... ._ ..0 0 L.. 0 0 a.a>C;:: ff.~'O cD 5.9=0 c0trO L..0..c: .E is 0 = 0..... 0.- a>VO~ a. __ .0. C) 0 = "C .E N 0 C"CC0 Cll=CllCll 00.5=0 E"C Q)~ - - o as >-- en~ ~ ... .- as a> a> E32..o o .E in - L.. ::J ::J a. E <{en - o c o :;:; a. ~ a> N ~...: .~ fii u E C"C Cll C a. a> 8~ o ~Ci) , WN ~~ = ls ~ .~a>~~~ ~ ls '0 ... .CD .u Ell::: O..c: c... trN.E Cll 0 0 ... 0 a.00oQ) G00as.~ ULOO!l>O OcOS,iiin N I W ~ ~ "7 .u w a a. a. ::J ::J e 8 c>o E"C Q)~ Cii1U >-- en ~ ~ ... .- Cll Q) Q) E32..o o .E u; - ... ::J ~C%E c Cll ... } 0 0"C a> as .u.2 e c-o Cll a E g.a.... 8 ::J 0 080 oCt') o Q) .u c Cll a. ::J 8 o Ct') I W a. ::J e C) I E"C Q)~ u;-a; ~~ U ... ._ ~Q)Q) ~32..o o '2 u; - ::J ~C%E II) - C CD E t'OCf.)"g .r:. 5 CD ~=a~ U.!BCD a:le1ii ;:a.(j) m~"O ~u:tij CD - 'in CD I .r:. -c- 000"0 ('I) II) .CCD o II) as .s;..!::: m 8 ~c.5- ~ ~(j) g-~ ~.5.~~c :OOCD CD .!a :::l CD .; '0 ~o.._;> t:: ~. t'O .0 '0 ~.uc[-8 .eoB's; ~ CD~II) e '0 = fi.5 0.. O-:::lalCD UOII)E.o CDC......_ .. .2 ,S ... aI U:t::t'Oc.r:. ,... 0 3= aI II) m o..a1S ~'Qj m >- C lO: ~ cEe!"O:E t'OO"OCD(,) C.t:: >-.. CD CD. .r:..S= E~~i>- S~q::...o ~ ~ 8 ... C o CD ~~ ... ~ o .. ~ 0 .1:: CD .900 II) .r:. CD ~ ui'"iS 0=2(j) E :::l CD S 0> S ~ E ~CD" ,c: 3= 0 1-"0('1) c: o ;l e!,S aI e! 0..a1 CD 0.. II) CD to II) ~ CD aI C q:: .:.. CD c"O CD- E 0 '0 I:: C1ii CD.r:. ~~ Z aI :E 3= ... CD >- .!B .e ~ = C .!a E .ip CD '0.... aI ~ O>,S _ C = CD 13.5 ...- .5 II) 0001"0 :2 a1= o!!::: CD "0 >-11)"';.5 ~ >.....-~ =II)II)CD>-'_ 0... ~ 3= ~. ~ &S :::l ... CD CD - :::l 0.. ~. ... = 0 .0 CD (,) ... 0.. c:r CD ~ 0 ~(j) Eo~~ ~(j) g-~ CD 0 ...... ...... .~ _II) C .o_'E CDi!O~ CD.~.5- CD 1ii 0 .- = lO: q:: II) 11).0 0 .r:. .r:. C '0 _ CD 10 :0 ~ ";;:" 5. ~ 3= II) .2 ~ 0 = ~ ~ q:: ~. t'O .g "0 ~ t:: 0 C - tij (,) (,) C o..~ t'O &.E~~=~li J!! 0 B's; e"'So1iiCD>-E CD~lI)e 11)0 o..3=...a1o.r:.o..co.. 0'0 0 ~ - 0...- ~c:'s~SE :;O:::lalCD <:s =c (,) aI '1:: 0 aI II) E .0 a13 2 c:~i II) tij 5 i"01ii 1I).o~~CDB8=:e1Utiji i~8 3=c tij.2 a1'~ 8.3=s ~'Qj l;j=... 0- II) 11)"0 >-to Cq::._ o..~ CD:;; o'-.a CD C E e!"O.r:. 0...... is.~ C cO aI - aI 0"0 CD (,) ...~w 0 ",(,)c.t::>-..CD w~. "0.-:0 aI CD CD. .r:.'S.r:. ~CD~.!at::-o..o.r:.o - .- > CD 5 0.50..... >10 ~ liS>- U-CD.r:.. o...ot'Oo..>~q::....o o o C :5! '5 .0 ~ C aI 0.. :::l 8 o 0> . c= :g g- Oo 3=0 "010 o . ON 3= .. CD - > <( 0 Sui'II)~'" CCD-OO ...('1) CDII)'sE.$2 OC 1=:::l0 - 011) .~~~SO_SII)": oJ .....cEo i'E-go=j:::l8~ 0:: CD t'O~g.. 01.. ~ co.g~CX)lI)o~-O o a1.!B= II) m...Q) ~ E ('I)Q.o._e 3=:::l... ~ <(:E: 3= ot'O'O 00 ~ , 0:: 0.. :::l e C) E"O CD~ ens >-11) (,) Cf.) C = ~ -- to CD CD E~.o o .5 (j) -... :::l ~C%E ... o II) t'O CD ~ "I:: ot'O.9 =...11) c:r8l1? 1I)C;:::0..; oll)E.r:. 011)..0> q"eo'ii) NO>('I).r:. U- 0.. :::l e C) ~ ~~ ~ .!a E ... ...... aI CD 01 oS CD13.5...= .511) ~.e:eO!!:::CD~~ e ~3=~~&S.s ~ 0.. CD S'u.9 E!!:::~ ~ ~.9J!!i.gi'2 __cCD.... !Eo.. 1ii 0 .- = lO: O. II) .r:.c'2_CDIO'8lD II) 0 0 = ~ ,;:: 1I):e~c_cE- "0 0 E 0 0 aI CD (,) ~o.....:e==.oli "SooeCD>-E II) "Oo..;>"a1o II)OCD>-"'O~- 8~utij.g; il a1.S 2 coS CD ~ c 1I).o(j)CD)(1ii~a1 :::l c:.r:.CD(,)<:s= -~8 3= c: 0 t'O.- a1._ c:t'O- 3= l;j1j"'0-1I)11)"0 0.. t'O CD :;; 0 .- .a CD o..-i.~ c: g>a1u a1~ "OO'-l;jCD CD CD ~ .!a :e ;g 0.. 0 .!:::>CD!::;O:::lO"... u- CD .r:. . oJ 0...0 t'O 0.. o O.r:. o:!:: 03= "ON<o;t ~ ^ . CD:;~ ~.o_ -c: 8J 0 0.. ._ 11)"'= c.911) o II) II) c .. t'O .5 5 C3 II) - ... 8.. v 8 .- II) c;::: 0.. 0>_ "0.50(1) c~= II) S.Sc:ro Cf.).oll).r:. - ~S o c: II. CD - E CD CD .!.!:: W :s 'Ocr CD~ .c (,) ~ ca c: ~~ CD :s CD u wu : 0 904.2 Automatic Fire-extinguishing Systems 904.2.1 Where Required. An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in this section. For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see the fire code. 904.2.2 All occupancies except Group R, Division 3 and Group U Occupancies. Except for Group R, Division 3 and Group U Occupancies, an automatic sprinkler system shall be installed: 1. In every story or basement of all buildings when the floor area exceeds 1,500 square feet, and there is not provided at least 20 square feet of opening entirely above the adjoining ground level in each 50 lineal feet (15 240 mm) or fraction thereof of exterior wall in the story or basement on at least one side of the building. Openings shall have a minimum dimension of not less than 30 inches (762 mm). Such openings shall be accessible to the fire department from the exterior and shall not be obstructed in a manner that fire fighting or rescue cannot be accomplished from the exterior. When openings in a story are provided on only one side and the opposite wall of such story is more than 75 feet (22 860mm) from such openings, the story shall be provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system, or openings as specified above shall be provided on at least two sides on an exterior wall of the story. If any portion of a basement iflocated more than 75 feet (22 860 mm) from openings required in this section, the basement shall be provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 2. At the top of rubbish and linen chutes and in their terminal rooms. Chutes extending through three or more floors shall have additional sprinkler heads installed within such chutes at alternate floors. Sprinkler heads shall be accessible for servicing. 3. In rooms where nitrate film is stored or handled. 4. In protected combustible fiber storage vaults as defined in the Fire Code. 5. Throughout all buildings with a floor level occupant load of30 or more that is located 55 feet (16 764 mm) or more above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, VOLUME 1 I GROUP AND DMSlON secnON DESCRIPTION OF OCCUPANCY A-1 A building or portion of a building having an assembly room with an occupant load of 1,000 or more and a legitimate stage. A-2 A building or portion of a building having an assembly room with an occupant load of less than 1,000 and a legitimate stage. A-2.1 303.1.1 A building or portion of a building having an assembly room with an occupant load of 300 or more without a legitimate stage, incl!lding such buildings used for educational purposes and not classed as a Group E or Group B Occupancy. A-3 Any building or portion of a building having an assembly room with an occupant load of less than 300 without a legitimate stage, including such buildings used for educational purposes and not classed as a Group E or Group B Occupancy. A-4 Stadiums. reviewing stands and amusement park structures not included within other Group A Occupancies. B 304.1 A building or structure, or a portion thereof, for office, professional or service-type transactions, including storage of records and accounts; eating and drinking establishments with an occupant load of less than 50. E-1 Any building used for educational purposes through the 12th grade by 50 or more persons for more than 12 hours per week or four hours in anyone day. E-2 305.1 Any building used for educational purposes through the 12th grade by less than 50 persons for more than 12 hours per week or four hours in anyone day. E-3 Any building or portion thereof used for day-care purposes for more than six persons. F-1 Moderate-hazard factory and industrial occupancies include factory and industrial uses not classified as Group F, Division 2 Occupancies. 306.1 Low-hazard factory and industrial occupancies include facilities producing noncombustible or nonexplosive materials F-2 that during finishing, packing or processing do not involve a significant fife hazard. H-1 Occupancies with a quantity of material in the building in excess of those listed in Table 3-D that present a high explosion hazard as listed in Section 307.1.1. H-2 Occupancies with a quantity of material in the building in excess of those listed in Table 3-D that present a moderate explosion hazard or a hazard from accelerated burning as listed in Section 307.1.1. H-3 307.1 Occupancies with a quantity of material in the building in excess of those listed in Table 3-D that present a high fife or physical hazard as listed in Section 307.1.1. H-4 Repair garages not classified as Group S, Division 3 Occupancies. H-S Aircraft repair hangars not classified as Group S, Division 5 Occupancies and heliports. H-6 307.1 Semiconductor fabrication facilities and comparable research and development areas when the facilities in which and hazardous production materials are used, and the aggregate quantity of material is in excess of those listed in Table 3-D 307.11 or 3-E. H-7 307.1 Occupancies having quantities of materials in excess of those listed in Table 3-E that are health hazards as listed in Section 307.1.1. [-1.1 Nurseries for the full-time care of children under the age of six (each accommodating more than five children), hospitals, sanitariums. nursing homes with nonambulatory patients and similar buildings (each accommodating more than five patients). 1-1.2 Health-care centers for ambulatory patients receiving outpatient medical care which may render the patient incapable of 308.1 unassisted self-preservation (each tenant space accommodating more than five such patients). [-2 Nursing homes for ambulatory patients, homes for children six years of age or over (each accommodating more than five persons). 1-3 Mental hospitals, mental sanitariums, jails, prisons, reformatories and buildings where personal liberties of inmates are similarly restrained. M 309.1 A building or structure, or a portion thereof, for the display and sale of merchandise, and involving stocks of goods, wares or merchandise, incidental to such purposes and accessible to the public. R-1 Hotels and apartment houses, congregate residences (each accommodating more than 10 persons). R-3 310.1 Dwellings, lodging houses, congregate residences (each accommodating 10 or fewer persons). S-l Moderate hazard storage occupancies including buildings or portions of building\; used for storage of combustible materials not classified as Group S, Division 2 or Group H Occupancies. S-2 Low-hazard storage occupancies including buildings or portions of buildings used for storage of noncombustible materials. S-3 311.1 Repair garages where work is limited to exchange of parts and maintenance not requiring open flame or welding, and parking garages not classified as Group S, Division 4 Occupancies. S-4 Open parking garages. S-5 Aircraft hangars and helistops. U-1 Private garages, carports, sheds and agricultural buildings. U-2 312.1 Fences over 6 feet (1829 mm) high. tanks and towers. TABLE 3-A-DESCRIPTION OF OCCUPANCIES BY GROUP AND DIVISION' For detailed descriptions, see the occupancy definitions in the noted sections. '128 t/) I- Z w :! w 0:: - :) a w 0:: w D- o: J , <i. l- t/) 1 (7) W ..J m ~ .. c CD "l. CD E N U) CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0'= z z z z z Z Q ::C6 ..J CD In ~ Q W ~ U) w C - - en c: c: ..J ca Q) Q) Q) ~ U E E E z CD .~ .~ .~ - ~ Co - - - - ~ - ~ ~ Q. .- - Co C" C" C" tJ) "0 ! ! ! c 0 0 0 s z z Z tn .. c C) CD Q CDE U) ..J en CD 0 0 0 0 0 Q) In o.~ Z z z z z >- Q ::c~ w CD ~ ~ W ..J ~ Z ~ CD ~- Co Q. .- en ... tJ) Q.U) - Z "Oca - - - - - '- c- o caU 0 Z .. - CJ) N Q) ...: .5 .c ~ E .!~ CD (I) - 0) (I) '(5 In ! 0)::1 a. 0) "- 'c .e ~~ C5 .c ct d co . .-.0 1 c'" .cO ::I c u_ ....'So G) ....0) (I) ._.,; =q C" .2 C.c_ c(l)O 0) _ . ~.~Q) > N t>>c 'g i C'r) ~.... (1)= o~o U G) .50 12 8:9 80)~ .- ::I c::i C) "Cc __ c .cco .S!! S N Z 0 (I) 0 "':oi c::l 2 c Cco B~ 0) ~ 'ii) U'- N .0) 0'- C" < )( Q) .- [1 cN... (1)(1) Ccoco . Q. ~ .... .C!: .2 ::: S :1:0)0 ..c:;'" - )( LL- 0 :) O)! :;cc 'C 0 (1)...0 E .~ ~ (I) co . ::1)( .S!! 0) i "00 "C O)cr:: U UO) > > al_ . c(l)- E 0):; a: U"C .- 0 ..(1)0 cu:e~ U "- U"C .- (I) Q O~ C(I)~ J:...N u(I)::I ..::Ic 0 .e c c cO)e . 0) UJ 0) t>>.... <- <._ cu -Scu ~cu cu_ o.g! (I) '0 _ 0) CD a..... C) 0.- ~c:5 o.c::l,e ~ a:c 8.5 Q ~! ::ICUCU ::ICU... ::Icu.o u:2 e a. c e :; ,sco . e a.:c ! CO) 00) O!O) ~8 C)8i C)(I)CU'" C) ::I CD cu )( .c . ~ ~ .I! 8 8.- ~ ~.5 .OJe . 0 0) N 0) MO Il) _ CD cr:: co .c(l) ... (I) -us gJ C5 (I) :c s (3 ....~ ;:c - .a.g _0) (I) 0 _... .cE 8. 0) t>> 0) '0 .~ ! 'a.-!e ~c.o 0).- - -... .;.c::l "C 0) (I) 0) ::IcC" C..t::: ~::I.Q ~.-! S ':0;1 E E cd!! 0) (I).l!l .E (I) ::I ::I 'c ~ - c ~ .O)c c e 0 ~ (I) 0 ~. Q) .cUi(l) gJ:5 .s ~ :5 .... (I)! ,,::I (I) _ f/S E(I)a. \J ca 0 0 S~O) ~ >- a; ... M ~""o5 ca ~ .~.!::: (l)o_.c - E Ib CD5$ a; :a::l"8- .5 S E !'o i c ca 'i(l)>- (I) ~ c ~ -6 '5 ~c ~ t>> ca .5 t>>.- 0 CD c i "C .5~"C :2 :a .~ ~ i +-! ill 0) c a. Q) - =.- ~.... 0) 'C 'S'- ~ = T C C a. .0 !~ v. ~ !-E (I) 0) OC .E is. ~E's ~ = ~8 .S!! : :o::JO)~ E en 0) v 'C CO-'" c S.o 0 '" (I) (I) 0 0) ~... E >- 8. - 'N >-= 0(1) ::I 0) Gica c 'S Q) '5. co : 0 'i 8 E CO-"C 1; (1)(1) U 0) c~c "C 1; .i! c'l U) co .C S 0) "C (I) (I) ::I ~ ~ ~ : ~ &.~ ; g 1; c 'S;U. - coa.-~ "C 0 co:o::JE e E"C"'(I) ! ts .c~0) a. CUc!CD '5 0) .!!l0U) - "CSCUc C" - c.... >- 0 (I) >-3'2 0) e 0)::1 (I) c !I:!-:c-.- ~ a. Eco.... Q) .....-Eca E .., 0) ~ .... (I) >- (I) a. ! ;.c~ cogcoEgJm'Q ~ c;:: co .... c 1U .- - (I) v. a; .Q :5 'a.c .c "6 (I) <.) co ~ >- - .- ....a.O)...cQ (I) ~ .5 ;: ~ &'0 .9-S:; ~ ~ '0. '9. '0 :o::J C Q) a. '0 0) :2 (I) ... 0) co .- ~ "C 0) "C '? Q) :2.5E ::!i2O)c.~._.* ~ ..t::: >.00 'S:2csa.>eg. - ':0;1 eE- .o.c(l)Q) 8 ~ i a. 8 i '0 0.= '- a. ;:1_ CD Q)(I)(I)(I)Q)O)( a. .QO)i a;C(l)ca.oa)' CD 0 .... .0 - ::I cu "C -0 - Q) "5! g >-1; ~ CD (3 0) c j . d!: ; '9. ~ 'S '[::! ~ "5! (I) ~:8 ra ... 0 (l)OCDOas'-.;:ica .c ~ia '~-ia;c=:E 1Ue (I) 1;) ::I 5 '5; i (I) ~ (1)8. 0 (I) .s ..t::: 2 Q)>-o'::c'~Q) (1)'-::1 ':o;IE .9- (I) ~ (I) CD ::I ~ 1U.- Q) ... ca fI) ~ .g. CD = ~:5 :if -6 :5 .g. ~ :! i ~ 0 i .~ i Q) ~ ;;; 2 1 i ~ cu e> 'ca 5 -= '0 tS:2 0 co U) a. ii ::Ia. ui ~ S v. c: 0) C (I) '0'- Q) a. \,I = S '5'C c: CD C 0.= CD ~ a. '2 ! (I) (I) ~ a. 0 = CD -g (I):; .fi ca '::1 gJ~ ~:~.; 8'.; gJ C5 2 i! EU) Of- ~:5Q.,.5.5_<.)LL1S~~.5 ~ ...N (OJ ~ InCO ... co t' i '. \. . (1: () (J l) l~ J Minnesota fire deaths by Bob Dahm, Bureau Chief As of Fehrt/ary /7, 20 Minnesota residmts had lost their lives bY.fire. /11 cOIll!,arisoll to /998. that total was 1I0t reached /Inti! July 28. Seventeen deaths were recorded during Jalllllll:\' alone. While the I1re calise for seven of the fatalities (two separate fires) is yet to be determined, eight of the remain- ing 12 deaths are directly attributable to fires caused by direct human involvell1ent~areless smoking (3), improper use of a tlammable liquid (2), unattended cooking ( I), careless use of a cooking appliance (I), and child fire play (I). Two tire deaths resulted from fires caused by electri- al malfunctions and one by a stove malfunction. The cause of the fire which resulted in the tinal two deaths are presently listed as undetermined. 42 Drug or alcohol use may have been a contributing factor in each of the careless smoking deaths with blood alcohol levels ranging from .122 to .342, the later more than three times the legal limit for operating a motor vehicle. Fitting the historical pattern of the last several years, the young and the elderly comprised the majority of the victims. Of the 20 deaths thus far recorded, four victims were under the age of 10 and 8 were 60 years of age or older. All of the deaths occurred in some type of residential property, further confirming that the most fire danger- ous place to be is the home. In nine of those deaths a smoke detector was not present, present but not working, or present but unknown if it was working. Six deaths occurred in a single residence with a working smoke detector, an indication of the intensity of that fire. One other death (careless smoking) occurred in a res- idence with a working smoke detec- tor however; it is reasonable to believe that alcohol (.342) impaired the victims response to the alarm. The fact that each of these deaths occurred in some type of residential property, where code enforcement authority and requirements for fire sprinkler systems are limited at best, begs the question of what can be done to reduce these tragic losses. Clearly there are those for whom no amount of fire safety education will ever result in the lifestyle changes that could have prevented their deaths. That is not to say we should not continue our efforts to educate people about the fire danger inherent in combining smoking with exces- sive drinking and drug use. Many people will be reached by the mes- sage, and we can be certain that lives will thus be saved. M innesotas fire service has embraced the use of smoke detectors and has provided thousands of free detectors to people all across the state, many of which have resulted in lives saved. Smoke detectors can't sound an alarm when batteries are removed or depleted, or when the detector is found on a shelf in the remains of a burned out home. We reach thousands of children each year through public fire educa- tion programs conducted in our schools. There are an untold number of reports of these educational efforts resulting in lives saved. Educating our children to the dangers of fire, and fire play in particular, is insuffi- cient when families do not transfer the lessons learned in school to the home, or when parents dismiss child fire playas a phase, or mere curiosi- ty the child will outgrow. The message here is one of person- al responsibility. We can continue our educational efforts and we can increase the distribution of smoke detectors to those in need, but until people recognize the danger of fire in the home and respond to eliminate that danger; until people begin to look at fires as not solely as a tragedy, but as preventable by human action; until people take per- sonal responsibility for their actions, or lack of action. the deaths will surely continue. Perhaps it is also time to ask our- selves if we have done enough to promote the installation of residen- tial sprinkler systems. W~w from history that fire sprinkler systems work and save _ lives, to the extent that there has never been a fire death mas nn- ered structure un ess t e occupan!.. --tllrcctly contributed to the hre's Igm- ~ tlon. MlOnesota law now makes It 'easier than ever to encourage resi- dential sprinklers by providing that a homeowner may install systems themselves. Their time has come. Minnesota's fire service is to be applauded for its public fire educa- tion and code enforcement efforts, and for embracing the instaIlation of fire sprinkler systems in public and business occupancies. Equally so for the improvements in fire suppres- sion training and equipment readily evident throughout the state. Each has contributed to the significant decline in fire deaths we have seen over the last 25+ years. Perhaps we can hope that the first seven weeks of 1999 are an aberra- tion, and that experiencing a fire death on an average of one every two days does not signal a trend. Or, we can increase our efforts, and expand Fire Prevention Week, mak- ing the remainder of 1999 Fire Prevention Year in Minnesota to encourage our communities to take personal responsibility for eliminat- ing this tragic and often unnecessary loss of life. MINNESOTA FIRE CHIEF