HomeMy WebLinkAbout12.14.93 Planning Packet1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVE MINUTES
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
DECEMBER 14, 1993
a. November 23, 1993 Special
3. DISCUSSION CITIZEN ACTION REQUESTS
a. James Pluntz
b. Bakery Sign
c. Farmstead Storage
d. Equipment Storage on Farm and Junked Cars Downtown
4. DISCUSSION ROSEBRIER CONDITIONAL USE
5. DISCUSSION CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 9TH AND 23RD
a. Business Signs Downtown
b. Landscaping Requirements between Public Streets and Loading Areas
c. Wetland Alteration Permit Hearing Prairie Creek
6. ADJOURN
AGENDA REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
DECEMBER 14, 1993
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. APPROVE MINUTES November 23, 1993 Special
3. DISCUSSION
A number of Citizen Action Requests have been filed recently concerning
perceived violations of the City Code. The following list of complaints
have been discussed a number of times by the staff. The findings
presented herein are the results of staff investigation.
a. Two complaints have been submitted for the metal building which
was moved from the James Pluntz property to the Harold Mattson
farm. One complainant charged that an accessory building was
placed on the Mattson farm and the other was the building was
moved without the benefit of a conditional use permit.
In regard to the first problem, the Mattson property is considered
to be a farm situated within an R -1 Residential District. As
such, it contains a farm dwelling, deteriorated barn and several
accessory buildings. Accessory Buildings are defined as "Any
building or use customarily incidental and subordinate to the
principal building or use and located on the same lot as the
principal building or use." This building appears to fit within
the overall intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
The second objection is directed to Section 10 -6 -16 Relocated
Structure, which says in part: "Before any building or structure
which has been wholly or partially erected on any premises located
either within or outside of the City can be moved to and placed
upon any other premises in the City, a conditional use permit
shall be obtained." The intent of this appears to be covered
with additional language which requires photographs to be taken
of the structure to be moved and all adjoining lots and structures,
plus the lot where it will be located. It suggests that the
concern is whether or not the moved structure will fit within
the neighborhood that it is going to be located. In this case,
the building was moved several hundred feet to a different lot
within the same zoning district. The ordinance wording suggests
a concern about structural appearance. A conditional use hearing
would do nothing to affect the appearance of the structure in
question. Current City policy also requires that a certificate
of insurance and surety shall be in place in case any damage
is done to public property during the move. In this instance,
no public property was involved. It appears the building was
moved without a conditional use permit but the move did not affect
City residents or compromise the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
While inspecting the Pluntz property, the City Building Official
did find that Mr. Pluntz has added a 35' x 12' carport to the
Planning Agenda Report Page 2
west side of the 1000 square foot storage structure that was
built with the blessing of the Planning Commission. It means
that the approved conditional use now has a 420 square foot addition
that is not sanctioned by the zoning ordinance and it was built
without benefit of a building permit. The existing conditional
use is, therefore, in violation of the City code.
b. One formal complaint and one informal complaint have been received
regarding the Bakery sign on Elm Street. This has been interpreted
by the City staff as a portable sign under Section 4 -3 -3 (B)5
which reads, in part: "5. Portable Signs: Such signs may be
used for a period not to exceed ten (10) days and not more than
three (3) times per year at one location or for one use. ....Such
sign shall be fifteen feet (15') from the street right of way."
The sign in question has observed the time limits reasonably
well, but is not closely monitored. The area in which the sign
has never complied has been the required 15' setback from the
street right of way. The informal complaint came from another
business person who attempted to do the same thing with a very
large sign and one that did not observe the thirty day limit
per year. The abuse of time limits resulted in the discussion
the Planning Commission started at the last meeting with regard
to signs within public rights of way. The staff needs more direction
from the Commission as to the objective the Commission would
like to achieve regarding these signs.
c. A single complaint was filed regarding a business use at 18810
English Avenue in Silver Springs. A sign on Pilot Knob Road
advertised the Christmas Goose Boutique. The Police Department
sent an officer to investigate and found the house was a model
home which was sold. The furnishings are being sold out of it
on weekends, plus. Thursday and Friday evenings. They anticipated
that they would be finished selling by the coming weekend. This
falls into the category of garage and yard sales under Section
10 -6 -18 which says "Unless otherwise regulated, garage and yard
sales within residential districts shall be limited to one three
(3) day sale, three (3) times a year. It clearly is not a business
and has a definite "sunset" built in. However, the Christmas
Goose could turn up again in another neighborhood next year.
The Commission will need to decide whether or not this is a problem
and if time should be spent on it.
d. The next complaint involved three farmsteads which include the
Royle Huber farm at 210th Street and Fairgreen Avenue, the Hammer
farm at the intersection of County Roads 31 and 50, plus the
Swanson farm on Pilot Knob Road. All three have various combinations
of vans, fish houses and junked cars stored on the property.
The Farmington Zoning Ordinance which originated in the early
1970s and was reaffirmed in the early 1980s is quite specific
with regard to the protection of existing agriculture within
the City. Agriculture is a permitted use in both Agricultural
Districts, the R -1 Low Density District, the R -2 Medium Density
District, the C -1 Conservation District and two of the three
Flood Plain Districts. As mentioned earlier, accessory buildings
Planning Agenda Report Page 3
or uses are defined as "Any building or use customarily incidental
and subordinate to the principal building or use and located
on the same lot as the principal building or use." Ordinance
interpretation has been reasonably liberal as to what constitutes
an incidental and subordinate use. To date, junked cars, fish
houses and vans all qualify as accessory uses as long as there
is a principal use or farmstead on the property.
d. The final complaint concerns two issues. The first is an allegation
that there are three junked cars sitting behind the former bank
building, now newspaper office, on Third Street. The second
involves stored excavation equipment on a farm on Flagstaff Avenue.
Both the Building Official and Police Department are investigating
and more information will be available at the meeting.
4. DISCUSSION ROSEBRIER CONDITIONAL USE
Chair Hanson has requested a discussion of the Rosebrier Conditional
Use since it was approved on December 8, 1992 and there appears to
have been no progress toward implementation. The attached memo from
the City Administrator to the HRA Director suggests that findings
of the Administrator will be available during the January 11, 1994
regular session.
5. DISCUSSION CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 9TH AND 23RD
a. Business Signs Within the Downtown
For convenience, the draft revision to the section on portable
signs has been recopied along with the paragraph that it has
been designed to replace. In addition, two definitions discussed
last time are as follows:
Trailer Sign: Any sign mounted on a vehicle normally licensed
by the State of Minnesota as a trailer and used
for advertising or promotional purposes.
Sandwich Board Sign: Any sign placed within public rights of
way designed so that characters, letters
or illustrations can be changed or rearranged without altering
the face or surface of the sign.
The City Council, on Monday, December 6th, adopted a revision
recommended some time ago by the Commission to eliminate the
need to renew conditional uses for directional signs each year.
There was some concern that this may need to be revised again.
However, the staff suggested that there is not a conflict between
the wording of directional signs and portable signs in either
the adopted ordinance or the proposed amendment. The major decision
that needs to be made is the size limit that will be appropriate
for signs within downtown Farmington.
b. Landscaping Requirements Between Public Streets and Loading Areas.
The issue is reasonably straight forward. The existing ordinance
requires 40 feet of landscaping between loading areas and public
Planning Agenda Report Page 4
k
rights of way. This has been a problem for investors in both
the industrial district and the downtown. The Planning Commission
has granted variances in both. It was suggested last time that
an excessive requirement of landscaped width could result in
a better site plan if variances are required. On the other hand,
space within the downtown and the industrial park is a limited
commodity. The experience of Prior Lake mentioned on November 9th,
provides some parameters that range between 10 and 30 feet depending
upon the street classification. It appears to be a reasonable
compromise between the original request and the existing ordinance
requirement.
c. Wetland Alteration Permit Hearing Prairie Creek
The City Engineer has agreed to forward a recommendation under
separate cover in order to complete the Planning Commission record
on this hearing. The delay involved the lack of response from
the various State agencies involved. The Engineer is comfortable
that the public hearing can be closed and action taken by the
Commission.
efA
Charles Tooker
City Planner
cc: file