HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.09.90 Planning Packet1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. APPROVE MINUTES September 12, 1990
4. DISCUSSION
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
OCTOBER 9, 1990
3. DISCUSSION Waiver of Platting Request from Patrick Finnegan for
Michael McNamara East Side of County 31 Across from
Akin Road Elementary School
5. DISCUSSION
Land Use Potential of 620 2nd Street Requested by
Harvey Snyder for David Schwappach, President of SEK
Conditional Use Extension for 42 Unit Apartment Building
on Lots 10 -13, Block 17, Original Town of Farmington
AGENDA REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
OCTOBER 9, 1990
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVE MINUTES
3. DISCUSSION Waiver of Platting Request from Patrick Finnegan
This item has been discussed during the previous two meetings under the heading of
Bible Baptist Church. Section 11- 1 -5(D) of the City Code says, in part: "If the
proposed subdivision of property would adversely affect the future orderly develop-
ment of the property or adjacent property, or if it lies within the urban service
area, the waiver may be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration." The
McNamara land does lie within the MUSA limits and the request is to separate the
north 10 acres from the existing 24 acre site. The staff position is that sites
this small are exceedingly difficult to subdivide and the topography of this site
is such that considerable pre planning should be accomplished prior to any lot
split. One major concern is access to the 14 acre parcel from two County roads
that will intersect at the southeast corner of the property after the ten acre site
has been created. Staff has prepared two potential residential street layouts for
the 24 acres suggesting that either one might be adapted by the owner to serve as
the basis of a PUD of which a Bible Baptist Church plat might serve as a first
phase. The benefit to the Church is that, sometime in the future, they won't be
faced with the cost of a City street which might border the entire south side.
The benefit to Mr. McNamara is that he is assured access to the 14 acre site at the
time of development. The benefit to the City is that an efficient neighborhood
layout will have been predetermined, linking the housing on the 24 acres with housing
to the north and east without the need to enter the proposed arterial street system.
Mr. McNamara has asked that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the
City Council which can then decide whether or not to grant a waiver of platting for
this request.
Recommendation
Forward a recommendation to the City Council that a waiver of platting should not
be authorized.
4. DISCUSSION Land Use Potential of 620 2nd Street
Farmington's Building Official issued an order in August of 1989 that 620 2nd Street
must either be brought into conformance with the City Building Code or be demolished.
Without any meaningful response from SEK, the owner of the building, the City Council
ordered in September, 1990, that the building must come down. SEK, through Harvey
Snyder, local real estate broker, now has requested consideration for an alternative
use. Because it adjoins both an R -3 High Density District and an R -2 Medium Density
District, both options are being considered.
The property includes Lot 9, Block 4 and the north one half of the vacated Locust
Street measuring 100 feet by an average depth of 122.5 feet. The area measures
12,250 square feet. At 14 units per acre in an R -3 District, each housing unit
would need 3,111 square feet for a total of 12,445. In other words, the site is
less than 200 square feet short of allowing a four unit building as a permitted
use. Another way of calculating the area is to say that the site is capable of
supporting 3.5 units. In an R -2 District either a duplex or two single family
housing units would be permitted uses. The latter option would require a subdivision
waiver. Mr. Snyder has indicated that an apartment building would be easier to sell
on the open market than two single family dwellings. It can also be said that
multiple family dwellings this close to the downtown would become desirable rental
property.
Recommendation
Depending on the size of the units, design of the building and off street parking
capabilities, the staff would favor granting a variance for a half unit because of
the railroad and the proximity to downtown.
5. DISCUSSION Conditional Use Extension for 42 Unit Apartment Building
On August 14, 1990, upon recommendation of the City Administrator, the Planning Com-
mission, by consensus recommended extension of the HRA Conditional Use Permit for the
adult apartment building proposed south of Hardee's Restaurant. This extension_
was contingent upon the approval of a building permit for this structure by October 9,
1990. The developers have not responded in a timely manner to recent requests for
information from the HRA Director. Although the City Administrator has not, at this
writing, had a conference with the HRA Director on this subject, he is inclined to
"put teeth" into the conditions stated in granting the Conditional Use extension.
Unless a permit has been approved, the Conditional Use previously approved will no
longer be valid.
Recommendation
Forward a letter to the HRA indicating that the Conditional Use granted on August 8,
1989 has expired and future use of this site will be subject to a new hearing and
approval process.
Charles Tooker
Planner