HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.19.82 Planning PacketAGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
OCTOBER 19, 1982
1. Minutes of September 21, 1982.
2. 7:30 P.M. Continued Public Hearing, Moench request
for Special Exception.
3. Receive Recommendation; Parkland donation in R -4
zoning districts.
4. Consider Petition of Helen Nordseth to rezone
Outlot J, Riverside Addition from R -3 to B -1.
5. Consider Request for Home Occupation Roger Ader,
20135 Akin Road, Greeting Card business.
6. Consider Petition of John Devney to rezone certain
lands from I -1 and R -1 to A -1 in Section 14
and Section 25.
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 19, 1982
2. Continuation Public Hearing Darrell Moench Special Exception.
The Storage Building was knowingly constructed without benefit of a building
permit. The City Attorney has stated that the ordinance does not permit
structures as special exceptions in the floodway if they result in an increase
in the stage of the regional flood. He stated further that there is litigation
ongoing, brought by the City which charges that the landowner: (a) began
without a permit, (b) was ordered to cease construction by the building
inspector, but completed the buiding anyway, (c) constructed a structure
in the floodway. David Leuthe, Hydrologist for the Department of Natural
Resources has said that the structure is located in the floodway and does
cause a stage increase and "places it in violation of local, state and federal
standards."
Recommendation: Section 2- 4 -4(G) 7. of the City Code says in part: "If
the proposed temporary or permanent fill, equipment storage or accessory
structure results in an increase in the stage of the regional flood, the
proposed use will not be allowed in the Floodway.... It appears clear
that the Planning Commission has no authority to grant a Special Exception.
3. Parkland Donation in R -4 Districts generally.
The City Council from time to time reviews all charges and requirements
established by ordinance and establishes fees appropriate to the situation.
Because the R -4 District has been only recently added to the Zoning
Ordinance, there is no Parkland Contribution listed. Staff is seeking a
recommendation to be forwarded to the City Council.
Recommendation: Because the density for the R -4 District is the same as the
R -2, it is recommended that the land contribution should be 9% and money
contribution should be $180.00 per acre.
4. Nordseth Rezoning Proposal from R -3 to B -1.
The concept plan for Riverside Addition included several outlots which were
to be held in joint ownership by a homeowners association as well as two
which were envisioned as sites for future apartment structures consistent with
R -3 Zoning. Outlot J was originally established for residential construction
with the awareness that two easements crossed the area. Northern Natural
Gas made the owner aware at the time of platting that the existing gas line
is very old and is a candidate for replacement outside of the plat boundaries.
While there is some question about how soon the site will be buildable, the
owner was aware of these limitations at the time of platting.
The Comprehensive Plan was carefully drawn to avoid recommending commercial
areas which would compete with downtown Farmington. There were specific
questions raised about the advisability of introducing even a convenience
commercial area at the north end of County #31 during public hearings on the
Plan. The proposal is in direct conflict with the Farmington Comprehensive
Agenda report page 2
Plan adopted October 18, 1982 by the City Council.
Recommendation: The Planning Commission should forward to the City Council
a recommendation that the rezoning request be denied because it is in conflict
with the Comprehensive Plan.
5. Home Occupation Request Roger Ader.
The primary concern of the Planning Commission should relate to the effect
the requested home occupation will have on both the neighborhood and traffic.
Specifically, questions should be raised with regard to 2- 4- 4(B)(C)(D) (E).
If the Commission is satisfied that such home occupation will not be harmful
a public hearing should be scheduled.
6. John Devney Proposal to Rezone Industrial and Residential land to
Agricultural as one step in qualifying for Ag Preserve Status.
The guidelines for establishing an Ag Preserve Program indicate that both
the City Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance should show that eligible
land will be used for agriculture. The parcels that Mr. Devney would like to
rezone are 20 acres in Section 25 (from I -1 to A -1) and approximately 40 acres
in Section 14 (from R -1 to A -1). The land now zoned Residential in Section 14
is separated from the Agricultural Land by the north branch of a tributary
which flows into the Vermillion River. This natural barrier is shown as
Conservation Land in the Comprehensive Plan and F -3 General Flood Plain
in the Zoning Ordinance. The land now zoned Industrial in Section 25 is
separated from Conservation and Agricultural Land by the proposed realignment
of County #31. This north south highway has been described as a man -made
barrier which will separate urban from rural development.
A major concern of the City is that two manufacturing plants are already
situated in the area zoned industrial. Others have been discussed, and the
City has responded with the preparation of feasibility studies for the
extension of sewer and water. In order for Farmington to continue to compete
for an industrial tax base utilities will be necessary. Also needed is a
land base, which ultimately will be using utilities, to pay for their extension.
Similarly, as Sewer District I develops, utilities will be needed for
residential construction. In essence a change in the Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Ordinance for these areas will provide the advantage of utility service
without assessments since the basic request is to make these lands eligible
for Ag Preserve Status.
Recommendation: That the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the
City Council that the requests are in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan
and should be denied.