Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.17.85 Planning PacketAGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR SEPTEMBER 17, 1985 1. REVIEW MINUTES OF AUGUST 27, 1985. 2. PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 P.M. Jay Christensen request for a Special Exception to place a manufactured home in the A -1 Agricultural District. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 7:15 P.M. Mark Grundman request for a Special Exception to add three efficiency apartments to an existing triplex in the R -2 Medium Density District. 4. DISCUSSION Tom Ryan request for a Variance and Special Exception to convert an existing duplex to a triplex in the R -2 Medium Density District. 5. DISCUSSION Draft copies of the revised Zoning and Sign Ordinances mailed earlier. RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATION AGENDA REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR SEPTEMBER 17, 1985 1. APPROVE MINUTES OF AUGUST 27, 1985. 2. Jay Christensen has indicated that the requested special exception will allow him to provide economical housing for his daughter and grandchild. He has said that she will provide assistance on the farm, but will continue to work full time off the farm. I believe that the definition of a rural manufactured home requires full time employment in the agricultural operation but the decision to hold a hearing implies favorable consideration by the Commission. My major concern is that the new draft of the revised zoning ordinance does not contain rural manufactured homes as a conditional use. This means that a neighbor of Jay Christensen, six months from now, will not have the same opportunity to provide help for his or her family. Approve the request on the basis that it will be confined to use by the family and will not be available as a rental unit or for sale once his daughter moves away. 3. Mark Grundman has not yet submitted drawings which indicate the character of the addition or a site plan which shows how many neigh- boring properties will be screened. Approve the request subject to strict adherence to density standards and a plan that will improve the appearance of this building. 4. Tom Ryan has an existing legal duplex on a lot which, under current density standards, would not be permitted. He has indicated that the building is divided in a manner that provides one efficiency apart- ment and a four bedroom unit. He believes that the four bedroom portion attracts either large families or groups of unrelated individuals, which contribute a disproportionate amount of wear and tear for the rent returned. It is the four bedroom unit which would be redivided into two one bedroom units. As suggested above, current density standards in the R -2 District would not allow creation of the existing two family use. The Commission, in a series of recent decisions, has not varied from the density re- quirements of the R -2 District. The options available to Mr. Ryan would be to petition the City Council to relax current density standards in the R -2 District, to apply for rezoning of this 1/2 block from R -2 to R -3, or to redivide adjoining property in the block which he also owns to create a parcel large enough to accommodate a triplex. Because Mr. Ryan controls 66% of the land area in the block, a rezoning petition appears to be the best option. However, a complete review of the north side of Walnut Street between Second and Third Streets will need to be inititiated since a zoning change also would require a change in the Farmington Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION Do not set a public hearing for Variance and Special Exception to convert a duplex to a triplex at 201 Walnut Street. Charles Tooker Planner CT /mh 4