HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.15.98 Council Packet
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
JUNE 15, 1998
6:30 P.M. CHAMBER/COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVEAGENDA
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments)
7. CONSENT AGENDA
a) Approve Council Minutes 6/1/98 (Regular)
b) Certification of 1999 Local Performance Aid
c) Northern Natural Gas Easement Request
d) Approve Bills
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9. AWARDOFCONTRACT
a) Adopt Resolution - Award Middle Creek Construction Contract
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) Water Reservoir Logo Update
b) Comprehensive Plan Update Process - Update
c) Cable Franchise Negotiations - Update
d) Environmental Contamination - Ash Street Stormwater and Sewer Issues
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a) Adopt Resolution - County Road 72 Feasibility Report
12. NEW BUSINESS
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
a) Hickory Street Drainage Update
14. ADJOURN
Action Taken
C/fiz.ef1 Cornm-tnl:s
June 10, 1998
Dear City Council Member:
We are outlining some basic facts with respect to the damage our home received during the May 15th stann,
Our home was inundated with almost nine inches of the most disgusting stuff imaginable, Not only
sewage, but debris such as leaves, grass clippings and twigs came shooting out of every floor access in our
basement. No one seems to know why,
The electricity went out at 4 p,m" per Dakota Electric, yet Public Works says they were not notified until
4:29 p,m, when paged by Trans Alarm that the lift stations were down, What happened to the alarm at City
HaIl that is supposed to go off when the electricity goes down? Who was monitoring this and why was
Public Works not notified? Was that alarm working, does it have easy access for anyone to see or hear?
Why is there no emergency plan written up for situations such as this? The last lift station backup was in
January of this year so there should have been a policy written up for employees to foIlow to make sure
they have the necessary equipment. Why wasn't there one drafted? Our situation was like a 3-ring circus,
There was not enough hose to pump trom our lift station to the nearest gravity fed line one-quarter mile
away. Employees had to drive a different route because Pilot Knob was closed due to a down power pole
and take hose from a construction company in town, When they get back, they find out they had forgotten
the connectors, The generator for the pump was not charged and neighbors went scurrying for jumper
cables, Then we had to hunt for duct tape to patch up all the holes in the hoses that was sending raw
sewage into the air and onto cars and pedestrians who couldn't pass up the opportunity to go by and take a
peek, Why were these things not check regularly and kept in good working condition and in ample supply?
What is the reasonable time frame designated by the city for response time? It was weIl over an hour from
the time it started backing up until the time they actually got the pump running. That is too long! That is
two hours from the time the alarm should have gone off at City Hall, Why is there no emergency numbers
for City Works posted anywhere that residents can call in the case of an emergency? I had to calI the
Police non-emergency number that was re-directed through Lakeville because it was after hours, The
dispatchers did not know who to call and was at a loss what to do because she had no numbers, The
dispatcher kept trying to reassure me that someone would be to our home soon. It took two calls at least 10
- 15 minutes apart and at least 30 minutes before someone showed up at my home,
When you filed the plan with the State ofMN for the sewer system for Fair Hills, how many homes were to
be on this line? Nelson Hills and Troy Hills had not been considered for development at that stage, What
was the maximum capacity of homes that should be on this line as opposed to the number on it now, Has
this system ever been updated for the expansion of homes and if so, what was done? How long should the
lift station-holding tank be able to last during a power outage, I have been told the tank should last at least
three hours before backing up -in a normal situation, A stonn that occurs during the business day means
many homeowners are not home and those who are seek refuge in their safe area, No electricity means
major appliances that use water cannot be run and most people do not wait until a stann with golfball sized
hail, 80-mph winds and frequent lightening strikes to take a candle lit shower or bath, So this three-hour
period should more than ample, Yet our backup started less than 45 minutes after the power went out.
Why?
Why is that no one in the Public Works area wants to explain why we had leaves, grass clippings and twigs
along with the sewage? Lee Mann and Billy Wiereke both admit to the stonn water yet said they couldn't
find where it came from, How hard did they look, where and who were the ones out looking? They will
not give us the guarantee it will not happen again yet don't seem to want to find out why it backed up in the
first place,
When the pumps were finally running, Billy Wiereke came to survey the damage and told us the City of
Farmington would have to pay for our basement. He said, "Something screwed up somewhere because
there should never be leaves and stuff in with the sewer. system," He gave us the authorization to bill the
city for the hotels we would have to stay in until our house was habitable, He gave us names of the people
we needed to talk to on Monday a, m, and said he had talked to Lee Mann who said to do what we needed to
do to get things cleaned up and send the bills to City Hall. He also told the Stark family that the city would
pay for the damages done to their home as well, We took him at his word as an official employee of the
City who was in charge at that time,
It is four weeks since the backup, yet we are no closer to getting all the information we feel is pertinent to
show how or why this happened, Why does it take so long to get information from the city that should be
readily available?
Why do all area cities, Lakeville, Rosemount, Apple Valley and Eagan all have backup generators either
stationary or on trailers that can do the work of the lift stations in the event of an outage? Why are we so
far behind the times? How many homes will need to sustain the damage ours did before the city does
something?
Our home damages are estimated at approximately $40,000, That is not a small chunk of change that
people can afford to take on, We have done nothing to alter the structure of the sewer system coming into
our home so why now? We had no trouble when 10 inches of rain fell a few years back, so why now?
The equity and salability of our home has plummeted because of this situation and to make matters worse,
we are no longer eligible to purchase the sewer backup coverage, We need answers!
The League of Minnesota Cities sends all cities they represent information regarding lift stations and how
to prevent the threat of backup, City officials told us that Farmington couldn't afford to purchase
generators, yet this article mentions leasing options as well as other solutions that would all but alleviate
the threat of backup, Why weren't these measures followed especially after the January backup?
We have a problem with the callus way city officials are treating this, They are not the ones who have to
worry about a backup happening when I have 13 daycare children in my safe area during a bad storm, Our
children are afraid to go into our basement, A storm is bad enough to talk a child through without
compounding it with the threat of sewage, It is amazing when a city says "Don't look at us! It was an Act
of God'" Well God did not plan the sewer system and God did not put the storm water in with the sewage,
We will not jeopardize the health and lives of our children and my daycare children, It is not acceptable for
you to say that you can't figure out what happened or how you can prevent future problems,
We would like these issues addressed. '
We would also like to see an article in a future newsletter addressing the need for homeowners to check
their homeowner policies for sewer backup coverage, Per your insurance company, ALL homeowners
whether on city sewer or septic, needs to have coverage, This is a separate addendum that has to be
requested- it is not automatic, This is information the city had prior to my backup and most likely would
have prevented the need of all this, We would have had coverage,
Thank you,
Russ and Dol;.!( Newberg
5680 W. 193 St.
Farmington, MN 55024
612-463-4567
......'"
"'0
...... .
ON
r.l....LIl
0...... .
,i(\D..,
114 ....
~
lil
:E
114
H
o
ZQI
Or.l
H N
f-<J>:O
~O""
H LIl
Ur.lO
OZ"
tIlH'"
~..:I ..
U~~
:;loil
f-<J>:;l
UO~
lilJ>:
..:Ir.l.....
lil81-l
~S 8.
f-< Ol
O<llJ>:
~~
r.l
gj
lil
~
I-l
Ol
.s:::
Z U
tIl.........
III 0 III
lCl; f-< 0.
114111
U e;.....
H~e
to
r.l
..:I
r.l....
~~I
f-<114
Ogj
~f-<r.l
eoz
o
tIl '"
lil
r.l ..,
= ..,
f-< 0
~ .n
loo:
..~
'" 0
..........0111
LIlOll'"-1-l
......... ;l
.......s:::UO
LIlU .s:::
&iOl
=tn
UIll
.....
l'"-;l
"0
'"
== ....
o l'"-
IN
....
LIl .
N
Ol
.....
III
e
8
......
==
o
.s:::
Ol.....
:>;l
o
o
Ol III
III I-l
III Ol
.s::: e
114 ;l
III
u..... ~
1110.0
Ol~U
'0
tI'
o,lil
;l N
o N
I-l
o ..
....
....
00.0'0
Ill~Ol
I-lU I-l
..... ..... 0
U~tIlt:
Ol Ol
.....s::: ...
of-<
.g
tIl
r.l
f-<
r.l
114
o 0
~ 0
'0 \D
~ ....
r..
Ol..... ..
e;l .
o mOil
~ I-l;l
.....OlZ
..... tIl ~
UJ>: 00.
Ur.l 114.....
~~ &
r.l Or.l
r.. 0
.... \D
*' ....
Z >.'0
O.....Ol
f-<..........
OUI-l"
Z OOl
~~H;;fre-I
'0 I-l~'
. '0 ,
Or.. III Ol ..
~ tno,.
o,~ ~ fl..... :
III III Ol;l &,
:E:ZtIlOr.l'
I-l
Ol
~
o
114
loo:r.l
is
U
.lil
J>:J>:
r.l'
C1Z
lilO
lilZ
r..
Z
....0
*'
f-<
zr..
Or.l
f-<..:I
o
Z .
HJ>:
~~
r..lil
J>:
~lll
OJ>:
lil
ee
riIri1
loo:lil
ur..
~ s....
riI *'
:E: riI
riI ..:Ie
~~ ;~
OJ>: Z <e
~5 ~ ~~
~~ ~ ~~
HtIl 0 H
f-<H LIl ...... ~~
~e ~ ~ o~
gj~ ,~~ ~~ ~J>:
rilJ>: '~lil ~ O~ <e:><
~~u ~ :lll~! 0 E-<~ ~~I
iH6 ~ :~Zlll ~ ~J>: ~o
J>:tIl 0 ,11400 IriI:>< J>:114
0J>:1lQ0 'Hili: J>: J>:~lI:U:E:
lil ~ 0.110 E-< 114 I>: 0 ...... 0 lil r!l
~~114~~ :><~0~1Io~~E-<~0~~E-<~~
E-<lCl;NIlQ~I~E-<itllO~~lI:~~~5~riIr..S
~~ 0:>< H ~llQlil O..:llil I>: 01>:
~O ~tIlj~ tIl~~ ~UE-<~lll ~r..
~
HR. TO/1 KALOUNSkI
CITY OF FARMINGTON
325 OAl: STREET
FARMINGTON. CITY OF
325 OAK STREET
FARlm~STON
HM 55024-1399 FARHINGTON
UL TYPE
HN 55024
SUPERVISED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
05118198 FROM 05/11198 THRU 05/17/98 PAGE
DATE. DAY TIME. ZNfOP .....ACTIVITY...... AUTHORIZED PERSON.
05111 MON 02:38 PH PT TIMER TEST
05/12 TUE 12:38 PM PT TIMER TEST
05f13 WED 10:38 AM PT TIMER TEST
05114 THU 08:37 AM PT TlHER TEST
05/15 FRI 06:38 AH PT TIMER TEST
04:22 PH 1 UNDEFINED ACCT OR Z
04:24 PH R1 RESTORE
04:29 PH 3 LIFT STATION & WELL
04:31 PH R3 RESTORE
06:23 PM 3 LIFT STATION & WELL
DB CALL PREHISES
DB CALL PREMISES
COMHENT PRE!! ISE - NI A
COMI1EtH DIGITAL - PAGED
08 CALL CONTACT LIST
08 READ COHMENT
COHMENT BILL WEIERKE - NOTIFIED
COMMENT WILL CALL BACK WHEN DONE
DB .... FULL CLEAR t..
06:4~ PM R3 RESTORE
06:48 PM 3 LIFT STATION & WELL
COMMENT PAGER PGD
WC PARTIAL CLEAR
06:49 PM R3 RESTORE
JS RESTORE ACKNOWLEDGED
JS PARTIAL CLEAR
DP ..tt FULL CLEAR .tt
10:00 P/1 3 LIFT STATION & WELL
DP CALL CONTACT LIST
COM/1ENT PAGER - PAGED
DB RECVD PHONE CALL
COI1I1ENT BEN VAN8LARCOM - CHECKING
DB READ CDHHENT
COMMEtH WILL CALL NHEN DONE
DB .tt. FULL CLEAR .t.
10:41 PH R3 RESTORE
10:43 PM 3 LIFT STATION & WELL
10:47 PH R3 RESTORE
SJS RESTORE ACKNOWLEDGED
5JS CALL PREMISES
rOHMENT BAD:
COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR
June 1, 1998
ta-
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Ristow led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Also Present:
Ristow, Cordes, Fitca, Gamer, Strachan
None
City Administrator Erar, Attorney Joel J. Jamnik, City
Management Team
4. APPROVE A GENDA
. MOTION by Cordes, second by Strachan to approve the Agenda with the
following changes:
. Accept Supplemental Agenda requesting that the June 1, 1998 Agenda
be amended to add the following items:
~ 9(a) "Award Middle Creek Sewer Construction Contract"
under A WARD OF CONTRACT; and
~ 12(a) "Bond Sale - 1998 G.O. Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bonds"
under NEW BUSINESS.
. Pull "Council Minutes 5/14/98 (Special)" from CONSENT AGENDA,
as Councilmember Gamer was not in attendance.
VOTING FOR: Ristow, Cordes, Fitch, Strachan. ABSTAIN: Gamer. MOTION
CARRIED.
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS - None.
Council Minutes (Regular)
June 1, 1998
Page 2
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS
a) Jack Benedict - Park Dedication and Plat Extension Request
Community Development Director Olson presented Mr. Benedict's request for
another 60-day plat recording extension for Cameron Woods. MOTION by
Gamer, second by Cordes to approve an extension for the recording of the final
plat for Cameron Woods until July 31, 1998, with the caveat that this is the last
extension that the City will consider granting. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION by Strachan, second by Fitch to approve the Consent Agenda as follows:
a) Approved Council Minutes 5/18/98 (Regular) & 5/14/98 (Special)
b) Approved Beer License Application - Tom Thumb Corp. - Elm Street
c) Approved Mountain Dew Days Permits
d) Approved Frontier Site Purchase Agreement
e) Adopted RESOLUTION R54-98 Accepting Donations - VFW Club and
Eagles Club
:t) Approved Change Order - Municipal Pool Project
g) Approved Capital Outlay - Fire Department
h) Approved Bills
VOTING FOR: Ristow, Cordes, Fitch, Strachan. ABSTAIN: Gamer. MOTION
CARRIED.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Conditional Use Permit - Charleswood Grading Approval
City Associate Planner, Michael Schultz, presented Genstar Land Company's
request for a conditional use permit for grading on the proposed first phase of the
Charleswood Development.
Mayor Ristow formally opened the Public Hearing at 7: 10 p.m.
Steve Juetten, Genstar Land Company, 11000 West 78th Street, Suit 201, Eden
Prairie, Minnesota 55344, was present in the audience and indicated that he
concurs with staffs June 1, 1998 Council memo and attachments.
Council Minutes (Regular)
June 1, 1998
Page 3
MOTION by Gamer, second by Strachan to close the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION by Gamer, second by Cordes to approve the Genstar grading
conditional use permit subject to City Engineer approval and submittal of surety
amount.
b) Conditional Use Permit Appeal- South Suburban Medical Center
Community Development Director Olson summarized the matter of South
Suburban Medical Center's (SSMC) Appeal to Council requesting that the
proposed public sidewalk be moved from the north side of Elm Street to the south
side of the Elm Street.
Attorney Jamnik stressed the importance of documenting the specific reasons for
either affirming or overturning the decision of the Board of Adjustment (Planning
Commission).
Police Chief Siebenaler stated that, in his opinion, the sidewalk should not be
installed on the south side of Elm Street for safety reasons. He emphasized the
danger of placing a crosswalk mid-block on a road, especially when there will be
emergency vehicles traveling at high speeds to and from the hospital.
Councilmember Fitch questioned how this project came so far in the approval
process and yet now the issue of overturning the approved plans has come up. He
was further concerned about Council setting a precedent if they overturned this
decision.
Mark Nicolai, 213 8th Street, claimed the City did not contact him regarding the
Ash Street extension and sidewalk. City Engineer Mann explained that the
former SSMC CEO specifically requested City staff to allow SSMC staff to
handle all communications with affected property owners. Mr. Erar also
indicated that this was a privately petitioned project, and therefore, the standard
method of notifying property owners was not required.
SSMC Director Dan Nicolai spoke on behalf of SSMC. He reiterated that the
hospital is bearing all costs associated with the sidewalk project. Mr. Nicolai also
stated that he has monitored the foot traffic on the north side of Elm Street and
concluded that there was little or no foot traffic on the north side of the street.
Council Minutes (Regular)
June 1, 1998
Page 4
MOTION by Gamer, second by Strachan to close the Public Hearing at 8:42 p.m.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Following is the position each Councilmember took on this matter:
Mayor Ristow stated that it made more sense to locate the sidewalk on the
south side of the street.
Counci/member Gamer stated that it was more logical for the sidewalk to be
installed on the south side of the street since more people cross the street on
the south side.
Councilmember Strachan stated that he feels the hospital is an important part
of the community, and since they're paying all costs associated with the
sidewalk, the sidewalk should be relocated to the south side of the street.
Counci/member Cordes changed her opinion from the last Council meeting
and now supports the relocation of the sidewalk to the south side of the street,
indicating that a sidewalk should also be installed on the north side of the
street once further development occurs.
Counci/member Fitch stated that, in his opinion, the sidewalk could be placed
on either side of the street.
It was acknowledged by all parties that the contractor for the street project would
not be able to complete the street and sidewalk work until the existing home
(currently owned by a private third-party) located on the south side of Elm Street
is removed, no later than July 1, 1998.
Attorney Jamnik confirmed that the terms and conditions of the Development
Contract would not be altered, with the exception of the location of the sidewalk.
MOTION by Gamer, second by Strachan to overturn the decision of the Board of
Adjustment (Planning Commission) with a 4/5 vote to install the sidewalk on the
south side of Elm Street, specifically:
The sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalk on the
west side of 9th Street at Oak Street and run north and
westerly along the west and south side of Elm Street to the
frontage road at T.H. 3. At the frontage road, a pedestrian
ramp will be installed. Across the frontage road at the
"island area" a pedestrian ramp will be installed and the
sidewalk will be continued through the "island area" to
T.H. 3 where a pedestrian ramp will be installed to
facilitate the crossing ofT.H. 3.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Council Minutes (Regular)
June 1, 1998
Page 5
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
a) Award Middle Creek Sewer Construction Contract (Supplemental)
Council concurred with staff's recommendation to postpone the award of bids
until such time as easement agreements between the City and the property owners
in question are finalized.
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS -None
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a) Adopt Resolution - Plans and Specifications - Second Street Parking Lot
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Mann indicated that the plans and
specifications for the Second Street Parking Lot have been prepared. If approved,
construction could begin as soon as mid-July with completion in the fall of 1998.
MOTION by Cordes, second by Gamer to adopt RESOLUTION R55-98
Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for
Project 98-01, 2nd Street Parking Lot. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
12. NEW BUSINESS
a) Bond Sale - 1998 G.O. Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bonds (Supplemental)
Finance Director Roland summarized the cash flow analysis impacting the sale of
the $2,670,000 General Obligation Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bonds. The sale of
the bonds is necessary to construct the Middle Creek Sanitary Sewer project. Mr.
Tom Truszinski of Juran & Moody was present at the meeting and spoke briefly
regarding the sale. Of the three bids received in the offices of Juran & Moody,
Piper Jaffray was the low bidder at a net interest rate of 4.705%, representing the
total interest cost of $1,137,447. MOTION by Fitch, second by Gamer to adopt
RESOLUTION R56-98 Authorizing Issuance, Awarding Sale, Prescribing the
Form and Details and Providing for the Payment of $2,670,000 General
Obligation Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1998, to Piper Jaffray at a net
interest rate of 4.705%. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Council Minutes (Regular)
June 1, 1998
Page 6
b) 1991 Annual Financial Report - Presentation
Finance Director Roland presented the 1997 Annual Financial Report to Council
for information only. Dave Hinnekamp of Kern, DeWenter, Viere, Ltd. was
present at the meeting and participated in the presentation. It was noted that in
1997, actual General Fund revenues exceeded budgeted revenues by $17,484, and
actual expenditures were $43,403 less than budgeted.
c) Ice Arena Enterprise Fund Analysis
Finance Director Roland summarized the Ice Arena financial review prepared in
coordination with Parks and Recreation Director Bell. The ongoing revenue
problems surrounding the Ice Arena were discussed in length. It was determined
that the major cause of revenue problems was due to the competition with ice
arenas in the surrounding communities. Staff has thoroughly reviewed and
considered the 1997 revenue problems and will take aggressive steps towards
improving Arena operations and increasing revenue in 1998.
d) Amend Dangerous Dog Ordinance
Police Chief Siebenaler explained that during the 1998 Legislative Session,
Dakota County was removed from the requirement to register dangerous dogs and
that the responsibility was passed on to local municipalities. The City Attorney
drafted an amendment to Farmington City Code to comply with the new State
Statute. MOTION by Gamer, second by Cordes to adopt ORDINANCE 098-
414 Amending Title 6, Chapter 2 of the Farmington City Code Concerning the
Registration of Dangerous Dogs. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
a) Castle Rock Township Development Review
Community Development Director Olson summarized the proposal by Castle
Rock Township (hereinafter the "Township") for 12 acres of commercial and light
industrial development in Section 5 adjacent to the Fountain Valley Golf Course.
Staffs concerns were primarily dealing with the extent of the proposed
commercial and industrial development and the fact that a portion of this
proposed development is located in the proposed Phase 3 of the Prairie Waterway.
Council Minutes (Regular)
June 1, 1998
Page 7
Gordon Wichterman, a Castle Rock Town Board Supervisor, was present in the
audience. He stated that the Township would need to follow the Vermilion River
Watershed Plan and would not go forward unless all conditions were met. The
Township assumed the City was in approval with the development since the City
did not attend the Public Hearing.
The City did receive notice of the May 11 th Hearing, but did not receive a copy of
the proposed development plan until May 18th. Mayor Ristow noted that the
Township had previously indicated that they did not have plans to develop this
area.
City Administrator Erar indicated that the City did not receive a request from the
Township for input on the project nor an opportunity to comment.
Mr. Wichterman claimed the Township requested a fee structure but that one had
never been received. He later stated that the Township would work toward a fee
structure before any development would take place.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Mann indicated that he personally met
with Mr. Angus as well as had numerous telephone conversations regarding the
City's Surface Water management Plan and corresponding fees.
Ron Roetzel, Engineer for Empire Township, was present in the audience. Mr.
Roetzel indicated that Empire Township was not aware of Castle Rock's plans for
development until City Engineer Mann informed them. Mr. Roetzel hopes Castle
Rock will consider incorporating storm water ponding into the Plan.
Councilmember Fitch:
Commended efforts of rescue workers during the 5/30/98
storm.
City Administrator Erar:
Attended Met Council/Community Development Meeting
with Community Development Director Olson. The Met
Council, as a Regional Planning Agency, declined to move
toward a more regional approach on the issues of
urbanization. They felt it was more appropriate for them to
deal with those situations on a situation-by-situation basis.
Council Minutes (Regular)
June 1, 1998
Page 8
Community Development
Director Olson:
City Engineer Lee Mann:
14. ADJOURN
Regarding the Eagles Club plat project, a lot of the
landscaping is done and some of the sidewalk has been
installed to make the connections to the Quik Trip, etc.
Regarding the Eagles Club parking lot, the railroad is going
through the abandonment process for the Spur Line. The
Eagles Club is awaiting the outcome of the process before
they build their parking lot.
Commended efforts of the City of Farmington Public
Works crew for keeping the lift stations working during the
5/30/98 storm.
MOTION by Fitch, second by Gamer to adjourn at 10:00 p.m. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
df{f)/Lvg.~
Lori J. Folie
Executive Assistant
16
TO: Mayor & Councilmembers
City Administrato~
FROM: Robin Roland
Finance Director
SUBJECT: Certification of Local
Performance Aid
DATE: June 15, 1998
INTRODUCTION
Minnesota State Statutes Sections 477A.05 provides for Local Performance Aid payable to cities
having a system of performance measures. Certification of LPA must be sent to the State each
year for the following year.
DISCUSSION
The City of Farmington certified LPA for the current budget year and is receiving funding through
Local Government Aid. Certification includes the name of the program to be supported by LPA,
which has performance measures in place, as well as verification that without LPA the City's tax
rate would be increased. All City programs have performance measures in place, so anyone
would qualify. Staff has chosen the Senior Center as our example for LPA purposes.
As for reduction of property taxes due to LPA: without LPA, a corresponding amount of revenue
would have to be found to fund the program. This amount would come from the tax levy, which
would increase our tax rate.
BUDGET IMPACT
Local Performance Aid receivable in 1998 is $11,624. In 1999, we anticipate $10,181.
ACTION REQUIRED
Signatures of the Mayor and one Council Member on the State Certification Form.
~4Zj
, Robin Roland
Finance Director
CitlJ. of Farmint}.ton 325 Oak Street. FarminlJtonl MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fa/( (612) 463.2591
MINNESOTA Department of Revenue
Property Tax Division
Mail Station 3345
Phone (612) 296-5141
St. Paul, MN 55146-3345
Fax (612) 297-2
May 21,1998
TO: ALL CITY CLERKS, ADMINISTRATORS, MANAGERS, OR
FINANCE DIRECTORS
RE: CERTIFICATION OF LOCAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
FOR LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID PAYABLE IN 1999
Minnesota Statutes, Section 477A.05 provides for Local Performance Aid (LPA). In
order to qualify for LP A in i 999, a city must affirm that (1) the aid will result in a
reduction in property taxes at least equal to the amount of aid received, and (2) the city
will spend the aid on programs for which it has developed a system of performance
measures and that these measures will allow for the measurement of continuous
improvement and will be regularly compiled and presented to the city council at least
once a year. The city must identify the program or programs that are to be funded with
the aid. The city is eligible for aid if it affirms that it is in the process of developing and
implementing a system of performance measures for the program or programs for which
the aid is being sought. However, the aid may not be spent on the program or programs
until the performance measurement system has been instituted, unless the aid is being
used to establish the performance measurement system.
Enclosed is a sheet outlining suggested procedures for local performance measurement.
This sheet outlines suggested procedures only and your city may develop its own
procedures which may better suit your city's needs.
Note: The affirmation that the LP A will be used for property tax reduction does not
mean that your city must reduce its property tax levy below the amount levied in the
previous year, or that your city (if it is subject to the overall levy limitation) must levy
less than its levy limit. It means that the LP A will be used to replace property tax dollars
that otherwise would have been levied. For levy limit cities, the overall levy limitation
reflects changes in LPA. The 1997 amount ofLPA is included in a levy limit city's levy
limit base. The amount of LP A for the taxes payable year 1999 is subtracted from the
levy limit base to arrive at the overall levy limitation for the taxes payable year 1999. If
the LP A increases, the levy limit decreases. If the LP A decreases, the levy limit
Increases.
F or calendar year 1999, the amount of LP A to be paid will be equal to the amount paid in
1997, $4,107,673, plus an inflation adjustment based on the implicit price deflator. A per
capita aid amount will be determined by dividing the total aid available by the total
population of all cities that qualify for the aid. Each qualifying city then receives an aid
amount based on its population times the per capita aid amount.
An equal opportunity employer
TDD: (612) 215-0069
~ a
iii' ~
~ '<
CD Q
C'l
::T
~.
a
~
CD
8
c
'"
.Q,
III
'"
o
~
~
C'l
o
c
'"
Q,
'"
1>>
3
0"
~
3
c
!e-
ll>
US'
? en
US'
'"
II>
c:
CD
o
-
-<
a
o
c
'"
!J,
.
C
III
CD
~
c.
o
::T
CD
CD
0"
'<
C'l
CD
~
~
~
.~
0'
~
CD
0"
CD
!e-
a
o
~
":1'<'
'"
o
~
10
c.
lC
CD
~
a.
0"
!t
.!t
~
CD
iil'
Sl
lI>
-c
CD
lI>
CD
'"
CD
c.
5'
~
(ii'
C'l
CD
~
s;
g
5'
'"
III
CD
-
:T
CD
3:
I>>
'<
o
...
I[
cr
'<
-
:T
CD
o
:T
I>>
::;.
o
-
-
:T
CD
0'
~
o
o
c
=
~,
....
c
CD
II>
'"
C.
C'l
Q
CD
~
!!,-l
cS' ~
a:
(i'o-
...
0'3
... 3
CD c
g UI
<' -
CD g
r-...
o CD
" -
!2.5;
"'0=
CD ~
~-
... 0
3 ~
I>> CD
~ 3:
CD 3'
:J:.=
a:m
'a S
..:! I>>
I>> C
crCD
(i''a
_. I>>
= ::l
...3
CD CD
CD=
~-
o
-
:0
CD
<
CD
=
c
!D
"'0
a
'a
CD
::l
'<
-l
I>>
><
C
<'
(ii'
0'
=
cr
'<
c..
c
=
CD
w
F'
...
CD
CD
co
3'
o
...
Q.
CD
...
0-
...
'<
o
c
...
"
~
-
o
cr
CD
~
CD"O~
CIl CD _
iii ~o =r
!:[...CD
(ii' 3 ll.l
=rOl~
"0 ::l :E
CD @ CD
5- Ol ...
... -, 0
3..0-..0
Ol 0 C
::l ... CD
@ :E ~
3 ~ g
CD - CIl
Ol "0 ~
CIl ...
C ~ Qo
CD iil N
3 3 (ii'
~o'<
-...CD
_CIl
CIl"O
'< ...
CIl 0
CD'lQ
3 Ol
cn~
- -'
Q~
,"
:E
=r
Ol
-
"Q
d
co
...
Ol
:73
CD 0
5'~
C'l ...
~o
"0 co
CD iil
5-3
... CIl
3 :E
Ol =
::l -
C'l 0-
CD CD
Ol 2'
o.:::l
0-0.
CD ~
C 0-
~'<
0.5'
-C'l
o ~
tr.l
tr:l
Z
H
o
:;cl
(J
tr:l
Z
8
tr:l
:;cl
~
00'0'0
... ... 0
:7-C:CD
CD=r:s-CIl
C'l CD -, '<
-, 3 C'l 0
':<CD=rc
C'l Ol - ...
o CIl =r Q,
3!:;~':<
C'lCDo.Ol
=3CD3l
Ol CD < ...
-a~3
ms.-8:7
CIl C'l CD ~
-00._
gg.~15
CD c '< 5'
Ol 0 CIl C'l
,<~CD'~
IE -, 3 "0
... 3 0 CD
'''"0 - ~
... "0 0
~ CD 3
CD 5- Ol
~ 3 g
:; tii tV
- ::l Ol
~ @ 0.:
~3~
c: CD -
=:Olo-
0- CIl CD
CD C CIl
"'"0
CD ~ CD
co Ol a
c ::l
iilo.o
... _::l
o<=r:7
C'l ~ CD
~ :7 ~
~,~ ~
roCD'"
0. 3 Ol
Ol CD 3
::l Ol 0
o.CIl'"
"oc"o
CD CD a
CIl CIl to
CD :E iil
a=:3
~~CIl
5'
:E
-<
m
en
:x:
z
o
:-
~o
ro~
Ol CIl
CIl,<
-0
~ !:;
~ Q,
-.:<
OOl
:73l
CD ...
Ol 3
3 :7
o ~
c
a5'
C'l
o Ol
- -
- "0
g CD
~5-
-g 3
5-~
... C'l
3 CD
Ol Ol
::I :='
C'l .....
CD ~,
Ol
0.:...
... CD
CD CIl
C'l C
CD -
<' 5'
~Ol
," CD
0.
C
C'l
-
5'
::l
5'
"0
...
o
"0
CD
;::l.
'<
iii
x
CD
CIl
-<
m
en
:x:
z
o
t1j
:x>'
~
H
Z
G')
8
o
Z
Z
II>
3
CD
III
'"
c.
3
~
5' a
lC 0
III :I
(J ~ ~
H CD !a.
8u>CD
to<: lI> II
o ::I
O';c.
t1j~i
CD c
.... ::; ..
'." 3 ::I
:x>' g ;:r
~ ![ ~
H C S'
Z ~ i
G') III
8 ~
o c
Z CD
"CI
1\1
~
:I
'"
::I
-
o
-
::u
CD
<
CD
::I
C
CD
W
N
\J1
~
o
:x>'
~
tr.l
8
:;cl
tr:l
tr:l
8
\J1
\J1
o
IV
ol::>
~
..
o
"CI
CD
i
-f
II
)C
c
b' ~ ~<'
5 10 3 iii'
.:< -g. CD ci"
..... a g So ::>
'-'ool::>CD:;cl~~
:x>' C'l 0"1 0 Cil ~
~ ~ w ~ 0
o 5' I H::' ~
8"'1-' Z _
:x>' 00 5' ci'
00 :;cl lC ::>
o 0 ~ '"
t"I ~
:x>' 0' en
Z 3
o ~
~
III
~
~
:,
::>
CD
III
~
en
en
...
.,.
G>
W
~
en
."
o
...
3
r-
"'0
>
o
(')
CD
;::l
0' :3i
.. n
r- m
o ~
n
!.
"'1J
CD
~
..
3
m
::s
n
CD
)>
c:
"'1J
m
'<
m
C'"
(j)
::s
o
~
o
....
r-
o
n
m
-
"tJ
CD
:\
o
...
3
m
~
n
CD
:s:
- CD
CD m
CD UI
CD C
...
CD
tlJ
~
::T
o
::>
!l!
Gi
...
N
N
CD
G>
U.
...
.,.
...
10
FROM:
Mayor, Coun~~mbers, City
Administrator~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.,
Director of Public Works/City
Engineer
TO:
SUBJECT:
Northern Natural Gas Easement
Request
DATE:
June 15, 1998
INTRODUCTION
Northern Natural Gas (Enron) has forwarded a request for the granting of an easement on a
property currently owned by the City. The City property in question is a future well site. The
easement would be for a Northern Natural Gas facility that needs to be moved due to the
construction ofCSAH 31 at 190th Street (See attached letter from Northern Natural Gas).
DISCUSSION
After review of the request by the Water Board, the Water Board is amenable in concept to
granting the easement with the following conditions:
1. City staff will need to verify that the placement of the Northern Natural Gas meter station
will not prohibit the future construction of a well on that site.
2. When the property in question was acquired from the Developer of Nelsen Hills Farms, it
was agreed that any well house constructed on the site would be architecturally compatible
with the surrounding homes. The Water Board feels that if the City is to grant Northern an
easement for the meter station, that the structure for the meter station will need to be
architecturally compatible with the surrounding homes as well.
3. The issue of compensation for the easement was discussed. The Water Board is aware of the
easement that the City needs from Northern for the sanitary trunk sewer line that is to be
constructed this year along Northern's property at CSAH 50 and 31. The Water Board felt
that if some type of agreement could be reached between the City and Northern regarding the
easements we need from each other, no compensation would need to be considered for the
meter station easement.
BUDGET IMPACT
None.
CitlJ of Farmini}ton 325 Oak Street · FarminfJton, MN 550211 · (612) 1163.7111 · Fa~ (612) 1163.2591
ACTION REQUESTED
Make a motion authorizing the Director of Public Works and the City Attorney to draft the
necessary agreements granting Northern Natural Gas the requested easement, to be brought to
Council for approval at a future meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
~J11~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
Enron Transportation
8r Storage
St'fl1iccs Pnli'ided [11/ Northern
Nfl/llral e", COIIII";IIII "'ilt
Tnlllsjl'e~t(',.,r Pipe/i,lt' CO",pOIIY
1600 West 8211d Street, Suite 210
Mi/l/lellpo!is, MN 55431
(612) 887-1770
May 18, 1998
MR. LEE MANN, ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF FARMINGTON
OAK STREET
FARMINGTON, MINN,
RE: DAKafA COUNfY IDGHWAY 31 (SE/4 SE/4 OF SECTION 14, T114N-RlOW)
DEAR MR. MANN,
NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY HAS BEEN ASKED BY DAKafA COUNfY TO ASSIST
THEM IN THEIR PROJECT REFERRED TO ABOVE. NORTHERN HAS SEVERAL PIPELINES
AND FACILITIES TIIAT FALL WITIDN THE DEFINITION OF TIIAT PROJECT, ONE OF WInCH
AFFECTS THE CITY OF FARMINGTON DIRECTLY.
WE HAVE BEEN ADVISED TIIAT SUCH MA'ITERS AS ARE CONTAINED HEREIN WOULD
REQUIRE CITY CONSIDERATION, AND TIIAT YOU WOULD BE THE PERSON WHO WOULD
INITIATE THE DIALOGUE, AND HENCE TIllS LElTER DIRECTED TO YOU,
A LOCATION MAP IS ENCLOSED SHOWING HOW OUR TBS STATION AND RIGHf OF WAY
FALLS WITIllN THE PROJECT AREA. THE COUNfY HAS ASKED US TO RELOCATE, AND AN
AGREEMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE RELOCATION WAS ENTERED INTO LAST
SUMMER. UNFORTUNATELY IT WAS ONLY RECENfL Y TIIAT TARGET DATES WERE
CONFIRMED AND SPECIFIC DETAILS PRESENTED.
OUR TITLE REVIEW INDICATES TIIAT THE CITY OF FARMINGTON NOW OWNS THE
PROPERTY WHERE THE COUNTY WISHED US TO RELOCATE. WE SEEK AN EASEMENT ON
TIIAT PROPERTY TO ACCOMMODATE OURFACll...ITY. NATURALLY WE WILL FURNISH
SUCH DATA AS YOU MAY NEED TO CONSIDER TIllS OUR REQUEST FOR EASEMENTS.
COORDINATION OF UTILITIES, SUCH AS NORTHERN'S IS COMPLICATED, AND NORTHERN
IS SCHEDULED WITH THE COUNTY TO BEGIN WORK ON OR ABOUT THE 6TH OF RJL Y, 1998.
YOU CAN APPRECIATE, THEREFORE, TIIAT A FAST TRACK CONSIDERATION WOULD BE
GREATLY APPRECIATED.
Barn MYSELF AND LIZ BABCOCK ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHf
HAVE AT THE NUMBERS BELOW.
TIIANKING YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION"I AM
VERY TRULY YOURS,
{!k~Jit/t;~~..
CHARLES HERRING, EPHONE 612-435-2887
RIGHf OF WAY AGENT OBIL 402-669-0386
NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
LIZ BABCOCK, 612-887-1734
Natural gas. Electricity. Endless possibilities.
,J V.71....:;l'UC?t . .:......'_ o' :,:-;~:7 ';UHf?;) ~
OZ ); ~I/.:L
'f,/ 'G it ilS f{) :lDJ 3S.i \-
OO'OII 2
. -r' L::' -- \:U
I I '\ _
, :;;. -I-
: .:;' \ll
,.,' Vl
. " c:t:
_~~.--l,--- " w
., -......
oS
:2
t\
~
.~",. ~ ~ "11'-~"'" i
1:7 / 0'
c bO ;./I..f fr/ .J.}r iO
" v
'/\" :lOa ~'~o' iU;)',lJ.}S/,".7"l c1J./.';"",~'d ~C.'9
,_.- - 7 -
. --:---1 '.0'" I
u-U'.)'7{;:J ~'!I,I.1C.'tf I .' v <,
ft' ._~ O. '\
':t ,
I
-.. V ----n..,--...,--.---::h:= _.=..=-.
-.
...._ _.. h,.. _.. '+,_
, I I
, I
. -----.
I ,
----'
: I
,--
lOOLL I 0 I
-- --=.1_L:::).
- --
611 tG--
~L.l
',1:)
f)
.,,~
\ '~
r() ~..
~
,__ ,Jo ,/:,,)
.---- -:,- -.,.:"
.,9 . -......'-, I
9). ...,...
''''P" .
I "
0
0 I
0 I,
tJ) I I
<1 .
1'<1
~
, -"
,'). t:... .' ...Jo)
"1 .. .....-.- -- .'- I ..~-.
A '0
. .
\ '~S
~
0"
0,
"
f5'
.'
tS-
,...
~O
..~
..".- .,
~.:
\.~, .-'2,
.' .,
)
,;;
.:;
. :I..
v
~~.
~.' "..~ -..----
~.~)',-
,~
",'J
--. ,
o
<:
.-, ^,H
_-J I \V
, '-1.......(.....-'
;\:.; ~.)..::)--=t
I
'"-~. ,
"~
rei' :
f, '.u'\)) lfu,
fr~. ,~~~$..:
o ~ "l.
DJ, - .<.1'
Q:jQ. . "
\.' 1
I
.--
'1'
~ ,
~Ij
"'">
:>
-?
~-
,......
...._J
L_
I
,.-
LJ
:01
--...
L.J
<[
.. ,.,
...,
<1
!
I
-!
i
..._~
Uakota coumy Kt:al r:.state Inquiry
nnp :!!OaKota.oarr .COm/SCrlptS! esr". =& AooreSS=&C IICK.X=l.J l&cl ick. y= I 77
Dakota County Real Estate Inquiry
D;;
" .
......
Select option and click map: I Identify EI
I Whole County II Refresh Map I
1tOTH,8T,W
-
Legend
Rul. Estate Parcels
. P lIrcels
[J Common. Ownership
I Standard EI
IlQ
~
o Last Name:
I
o PIN:
I
o House Number:
I
o Address:
I
I Search
PIN: 14-50500-010-00 Est. Total Value: 7500~. .
Owner: CITY OF FARMINGTON Current Total Tax: $0
Address: Total Acreage: 0.58 .'
City: , Year Built: 0
;~tl~oii,:~":~~~~?;~;~~::=-~i~;~~:~~:...y;. \'.~~..; VI" ~;: '\;;;,'~:-~:;-. ':~: 't -~" .;':.';~"r:,~;;,)-~,::'~',-:'~i
J..r--.....,)1r...'\,.,.~.,.;-,... ~_~,"';.t.~.,J;..'t....~ ,>., _~ ........"t.-..--l- ....f~_'" _1,. 0- .-,'- __f ~..., ! -"l..~.t ,"--n
~:~VJ: ~'Lt'~~~~\)~ir~,:;;~~{l; ,~.~h:I~~}\~~ 2-~C .~~~ wt:~~~l :: ~ t';~ . $ to f .\ ll~~:{" ,~! 1\; 'J:J- ~ ~. ~.~,~,
~jY_ N
/ ;J,.~ ~/ {)~?
I of I
I
I
I
I
3/31/9811:16AM
May 28, 1998
Mr. Charles Herring
Enron Transportation and Storage
1600 West 82nd Street, Suite 210
Minneapolis, MN 55431
RE: Easement Request, TBS Station, CSAH 31 project.
Dear Mr. Herring:
This letter is in response to your letter of May 18 in reg~d to the easement Northern
Natural Gas needs for the TBS station currently in the vicinity of 190th Street. It is our
understanding that Northern would like to relocate the TBS station onto property that is
currently owned by the City for a future well site. I have discussed the issue with the
Fannington Water Board and they are amenable in concept to granting the easement with
the following conditions:
1. City staff will need to verify that the placement of the TBS station will not prohibit
the future construction of a well on that site.
2. When the property in question was acquired from the Developer of Nelsen Hills
Farms, it was agreed that any well house constructed on the site would be
architecturally compatible with the surrounding homes. The Water Board feels that if
the City is to grant Northern an easement for the TBS station, that the structure for the
TBS station will 'need to be architecturally compatible with the 'silrt6tllidirig' homes' as
well.
3. The issue of compensation for the easement was discussed. The Water Board is
aware of the easement that the City needs from Northern for the sanitary trunk- sewer
line that is to be constructed this year along Northern's property at CSAH 50 and 31.
The Water Board felt that if some type of negotiated swap could be agreed upon
between the City and Northern regarding the easements we need from each other, no
compensation would need to be considered for the TBS station easement.
CitlJ of FarminlJton 325 Oak Street · Farmin9ton, MN 55024 . (612) 463-7111 · Fair (612) 463-2591
Please contact me at your earliest convenience with your comments regarding these
conditions. We understand the time frame with which Northern Natural Gas is working
on this issue and it is anticipated that an agreement can be worked out quickly.
Sincerely,
Ozt.YJ17'h~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
612-463-1601
re. Dave Olson, Community Development Director
Joel Jamnik, City Attorney
Liz Babcock, Enron
COUNCIL REGISTER
Council Meeting on June 15, 1998
VENDOR
11-JUN-1998 (11:30)
let
AA EQUIPMENT COMPANY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTIVITY
DESCRIPTION
CHECK AMOUNT
CK-SUBSYSTEM
<*>
AIRLAKE FORD MERCURY
<*>
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
<*>
ALBERTS, CHAD M
<*>
ALCORN BEVERAGE CO. INC.
<*>
AMERICA'S SPORTING CLUB
<*>
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RETIRE
<*>
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
<*>
APACHE HOSE & BELTING INC
<*>
APPLE VALLEY, CITY OF
<*>
AQUA LOGIC INC
<*>
ARMAN-JONES, JODY
<*>
BAINES, JODY
<*>
BAKKEN HOMES
<*>
BARlAGE, LINDA
<*>
BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO
<*>
BASSAI RECREATIONAL TECHNOLOGI
<*>
BENSON CONSTRUCTION, DOUG
<*>
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK INC
<*>
BONFE HOMEBUILDERS
<*>
BRAUN PUMP & CONTROLS
<*>
BROCK WHITE COMPANY
<*>
BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES
<*>
BT OFFICE PRODUCTS INTERNATION
<*>
C P RAIL LIMITED
<*>
LIQUOR BLDG IMPROVEMENT 1,916.06 OH
1,916.06*
FLEET MAINT SERV TRANSPORT COSTS 32.90 OH
32.90*
BUILDING INSPCT UTILITIES 28.14 OH
BUILDING MAINT UTILITIES 9.75 OH
FIRE SERVICES UTILITIES 38.24 OH
PARK MAINT UTILITIES 23.65 OH
RECREATION PROGR UTILITIES 25.40 OH
RESCUE SQUAD UTILITIES 43.78 OH
168.96*
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES 24.69 OH
24.69*
LIQUOR MERCH FOR RESALE 20,694.39 OH
20,694.39*
Recreation prog OPER MAT & SUPPL 325.28 OH
325.28*
Senior Center OPER MAT & SUPPL 104.00 OH
104.00*
PLANNING/ZONING DUES & SUBSCRIP 480.00 OH
480.00*
SEWER OPEATIONS OPER MAT & SUPPL 434.52 OH
434.52*
SOLID WASTE SPEC ACT SUPPL 592.61 OH
592.61*
SWIMMING POOL OPER MAT & SUPPL 1,416.45 OH
1,416.45*
Recreation Prog OPER MAT & SUPPL 35.00 OH
35.00*
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES 12.05 OH
12.05*
ESCROW FUND ESCROWS PAYABLE 1,500.00 OH
1,500.00*
Recreation prog OPER MAT & SUPPL 75.00 OH
75.00*
STREET MAINT OPER MAT & SUPPL 6,321.27 OH
6,321.27*
ICE ARENA BLDG IMPROVEMENT 5,428.00 OH
5,428.00*
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES 16.52 OH
16.52*
PARK IMP FUND DONATIONS 200.00 OH
200.00*
ESCROW FUND ESCROWS PAYABLE 1,500.00 OH
1,500.00*
SEWER OPEATIONS PROF SERVICES 5,283.29 OH
5,283.29*
STREET MAINT OPER MAT & SUPPL 288.46 OH
288.46*
SOLID WASTE PROF SERVICES 11,611.24 OH
11,611. 24*
ADMINISTRATION OFF & PAPER SUPP 396.00 OH
396.00*
STATE AID CONST PROF SERVICES 833.46 OH
833.46*
COUNCIL REGISTER
VENDOR
11-JUN-1998 (11:30)
ACTIVITY
DESCRIPTION
CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYSTEM
<*>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CARABEC HOMES
CARQUEST
<*>
CARUFEE, RILEE
<*>
CHAPIN CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN I
<*>
CHURCHILL TIRE INC
<*>
COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES
<*>
COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC
<*>
CROSS NURSERIES INC
<*>
cr's UNIFORMS
<*>
DAY DISTRIBUTING CO
<*>
DICK'S SANITATION INC
<*>
DU CHENE, ALEX
<*>
ELVESTAD CONSTRUCTION, PETE
<*>
ENDRES, REBECCA JO
<*>
FARMINGTON AREA CHAMBER OF COM
<*>
FARMINGTON EMPLOYEE CLUB
<*>
FARMINGTON INDEPENDENT
<*>
FARMINGTON PRINTING INC
<*>
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
<*>
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMP
<*>
FRITZ COMPANY INC
<*>
ESCROW FUND ESCROWS PAYABLE 1,500.00 OH
1,500.00*
BUILDING INSPCT TRANSPORT COSTS 25.80 OH
ENGINEERING SERV TRANSPORT COSTS 59.87 OH
FIRE SERVICES TRANSPORT COSTS 169.21 OH
FLEET MAINT SERV EQUIP MAINT/RENT 191.70 OH
PARK MAINT TRANSPORT COSTS 84.93 OH
SOLID WASTE TRANSPORT COSTS 234.74 OH
STREET MAINT TRANSPORT COSTS 120.47 OH
886.72*
Recreation Prog OPER MAT & SUPPL 20.00 OH
20.00*
STREET MAINT PRINT & PUBLISH 88.45 OH
88.45*
PATROL SERVICES TRANSPORT COSTS 562.00 OH
562.00*
LIQUOR MERCH FOR RESALE 293.95 OH
293.95*
LIQUOR MERCH FOR RESALE 16,157.00 OH
16,157.00*
TREE MAINTENANCE SPEC ACT SUPPL 2,189.65 OH
2,189.65*
PATROL SERVICES OPER MAT & SUPPL 384.86 OH
POLICE ADMIN OPER MAT & SUPPL 38.95 OH
423.81*
LIQUOR MERCH FOR RESALE 744.15 OH
744.15*
SOLID WASTE PROF SERVICES 11,986.03 OH
11,986.03*
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES 47.41 OH
47.41*
ESCROW FUND ESCROWS PAYABLE 1,500.00 OH
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES 24.51 OH
1,524.51*
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES 20.42 OH
20.42*
PERSONNEL MISC 250.00 OH
250.00*
GENERAL FUND EMPLOYEE CLUB 48.00 OH
48.00*
MIDDLE CREEK TRU PRINT & PUBLISH 29.70 OH
PERSONNEL PRINT & PUBLISH 26.25 OH
55.95*
ADMINISTRATION PRINT & PUBLISH 386.60 OH
BUILDING INSPCT OFF & PAPER SUPP 4.79 OH
GEN ACCOUNTING PRINT & PUBLISH 170.40 OH
PATROL SERVICES OPER MAT & SUPPL 2.50 OH
SENIOR CITIZEN PRINT & PUBLISH 154.43 OH
718.72*
GENERAL FUND SAVINGS BONDS 25.00 OH
25.00*
GENERAL FUND MEDICAL INS 416.98 OH
416.98*
LIQUOR MERCH FOR RESALE 1,145.37 OH
1,145.37*
COUNCIL REGISTER
VENDOR
ACTIVITY
11-JUN-1998 (11:30)
DESCRIPTION
CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYSTEM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OH
OH
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS - ACCE
<..>
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS SERVIC
<..>
GALL'S INC
<..>
GARVEY CONSTRUCTION INC
<..>
GOPHER SIGN CO
<..>
GORDON, GAIL
<..>
GRANNIS & GRANNIS P.A.
<..>
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES OF MN IN
<..>
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
<..>
HARMS, KIM
<..>
HAYNES, TRICIA
<..>
HEGSETH, NORRIE
<..>
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
<..>
HOFFBECK TRUCKING INC
<..>
HOHENSTEINS INC
<..>
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457
<..>
INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC
<..>
INTERSTATE BATTERY TWIN CITIES
<..>
JARVI CONSTRUCTION
<..>
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPAN
<..>
JORDAN BEVERAGE INC
<..>
KELLY ELECTRIC INC
<..>
KENNEDY, DOREEN
<..>
KERN, DEWENTER, VIERE, LTD.
GEN ACCOUNTING
MIS
COMMUNICATIONS
PATROL SERVICES
STREET MAINT
STREET MAINT
Recreation prog
ADMINISTRATION
PLANNING/ZONING
SOLID WASTE
LIQUOR
Recreation prog
SOLID WASTE
Recreation prog
FIRE SERVICES
CHINESE REST
LIQUOR
GENERAL FUND
PARK MAINT
PARK MAINT
ESCROW FUND
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
BUILDING MAINT
LIQUOR
Recreation prog
GEN ACCOUNTING
HRA/ECONOMIC DEV
ICE ARENA
LIQUOR
SEWER OPEATIONS
SOLID WASTE
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
OPER MAT & SUPPL
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
OPER MAT & SUPPL
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
SPEC ACT SUPPL
MERCH FOR RESALE
OPER MAT & SUPPL
SPEC ACT SUPPL
OPER MAT & SUPPL
SCHOOL & CONF
CONTRACT SERVICE
MERCH FOR RESALE
ICMA
OPER MAT & SUPPL
EQUIP MAINT/RENT
ESCROWS PAYABLE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
EQUIP MAINT/RENT
BLDG IMPROVEMENT
OPER MAT & SUPPL
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
401.28
401.28
802.56"
113 . 17
113 .17"
15.69
15.69"
3,440.00
3,440.00"
43,36
43.36"
15.00
15.00"
104.50
25.00
129.50"
1,200.00
1,200.00"
5,532.05
5,532.05"
35.00
35.00"
350.00
350.00"
10.00
10.00"
633.00
633.00"
147.50
147. SO'"
4,358.10
4,358.10"
3,718.74
3,718.74"
55.00
55.00"
103.20
103.20"
1,500.00
1,500.00"
4,980.48
4,980.48"
2,917.10
2,917.10"
264.69
58.88
323.57"
89.38
89.38"
1,980.00
591.03
243.81
243.81
243.81
243.81
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
COUNCIL REGISTER
VENDOR
KERN, DEWENTER, VIERE, LTD.
<*>
KEYLAND HOMES
<*>
LAKEVILLE PUBLISHING INC
<*>
LAMPERTS
<*>
LUDWIG, HUBERT
<*>
LYNDE COMPANY LLC, THE
<*>
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT
<*>
MANKE, JOHN
<*>
MANLEY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
<*>
MARK VII DISTRIBUTORS INC
<*>
MARQUETTE BANK - LAKEVILLE
<*>
MARTHALER, NANCY
<*>
MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES INC
<*>
MCALLISTER CONSTRUCTION
<*>
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
<*>
METRO WELDING SUPPLY
<*>
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
<*>
MINNESOTA AFSCME COUNCIL #14
<*>
MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOCIATION
<*>
MINNESOTA, STATE OF
<*>
MN CROWN DISTRIBUTING INC
<*>
MOODY, ANTON
<*>
MORE 4
<*>
NATROGAS INC.
<*>
NELSON RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
<*>
ACTIVITY
WATER UTILITY
ll-JUN-1998 (11:30)
DESCRIPTION
CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYSTEM
OH
PROF SERVICES
ESCROW FUND ESCROWS PAYABLE
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES
LIQUOR PRINT & PUBLISH
SEWER OPEATIONS OPER MAT & SUPPL
LIQUOR BLDG IMPROVEMENT
WATER UTILITY OPER MAT & SUPPL
SOLID WASTE TRANSPORT COSTS
BUILDING INSPCT SCHOOL & CONF
ESCROW FUND ESCROWS PAYABLE
LIQUOR MERCH FOR RESALE
CAPITAL ACQUIS DEBT PRIN
STREET MAINT
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES
PROF SERVICES
ESCROW FUND
SOLID WASTE
ESCROWS PAYABLE
SPEC ACT SUPPL
RECREATION PROGR EQUIP MAINT/RENT
GENERAL FUND
SEWER OPERATIONS S.A.C. CHARGE
AFSCME UNION DUE
GENERAL FUND
PATROL SERVICES
LIQUOR
Recreation prog
ENGINEERING SERV
INVESTIGATION
POLICE ADMIN
PUBL SAFE PRGM
Recreation prog
STREET MAINT
EMERG MGMT SERV
MBA/MN BENEFITS
EQUIP MAINT/RENT
MERCH FOR RESALE
OPER MAT & SUPPL
OPER MAT & SUPPL
OPER MAT & SUPPL
OPER MAT & SUPPL
SPEC ACT SUPPL
OPER MAT & SUPPL
PROF SERVICES
EQUIP MAINT /RENT
413.73
3,960.00*
1,500.00
43.67
1,543.67*
25.00
25.00*
27.47
27.47*
1,108.00
1,108.00*
83.66
83.66*
25.74
25.74*
22.10
22.10*
1,500.00
1,500.00*
7,830.85
7,830.85*
26,478.63
26,478.63*
25.42
25.42*
295.00
295.00*
4,500.00
4,500.00*
2,860.00
2,860.00*
1.11
1.11*
112,860.00
112,860.00*
387.30
387.30*
278.83
278.83*
24.00
24.00*
41. 00
41. 00*
151.13
151.13*
12.14
21. 30
25.67
537.31
372.52
968.94*
31. 95
31.95*
4,082.00
4,082.00*
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
COUNCIL REGISTER
VENDOR
11-JUN-1998 (11:30)
ACTIVITY
DESCRIPTION
CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYSTEM
OH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NORTHERN HYDRAULICS INC
<*>
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
<*>
NRG ENERGY INC
<*>
OVERHEAD DOOR CO. OF THE NORTH
<*>
PALMER, MARK
<*>
PAUSTIS WINE CO.
<*>
PEDERSEN AUTO SHOP INC
<*>
PEER ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEE
<*>
PELLICCI HARDWARE & RENTAL
<*>
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS
<*>
PEPSI COLA COMPANY
<*>
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC
<*>
PIONEER DEVELOPMENT
<*>
POLFUS IMPLEMENT INC.
<*>
POSITIVE PROMOTIONS
<*>
POTHEN, DIANE
<*>
RESCUE SQUAD
TRANSPORT COSTS
BUILDING MAINT UTILITIES
HRA/ECONOMIC DEV UTILITIES
LIQUOR UTILITIES
PARK MAINT UTILITIES
SENIOR CITIZEN UTILITIES
SEWER OPEATIONS UTILITIES
SIGNAL MAINT UTILITIES
SWIMMING POOL UTILITIES
WATER UTILITY UTILITIES
SOLID WASTE
PROF SERVICES
BUILDING MAINT
EQUIP MAINT/RENT
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES
LIQUOR
MERCH FOR RESALE
ENGINEERING SERV EQUIP MAINT/RENT
STREET MAINT EQUIP MAINT/RENT
STREET MAINT
PROF SERVICES
BUILDING MAINT OPER MAT & SUPPL
ENGINEERING SERV OPER MAT & SUPPL
FIRE SERVICES OPER MAT & SUPPL
FLEET MAINT SERV EQUIP MAINT/RENT
ICE ARENA OPER MAT & SUPPL
LIQUOR BLDG IMPROVEMENT
PATROL SERVICES TRANSPORT COSTS
POLICE ADMIN OPER MAT & SUPPL
RESCUE SQUAD EQUIP MAINT/RENT
SENIOR CITIZEN OPER MAT & SUPPL
SEWER OPEATIONS OPER MAT & SUPPL
SOLID WASTE OPER MAT & SUPPL
STREET MAINT OPER MAT & SUPPL
SWIMMING POOL EQUIP MAINT/RENT
WATER UTILITY OPER MAT & SUPPL
BUILDING MAINT UTILITIES
LIQUOR MERCH FOR RESALE
LIQUOR MERCH FOR RESALE
ESCROW FUND ESCROWS PAYABLE
PARK MAINT OPER MAT & SUPPL
Recreation prog OPER MAT & SUPPL
Recreation prog OPER MAT & SUPPL
93.99
93.99*
1,115.21
105.21
333.55
103.60
172.29
71.46
233.14
142.36
1,708.62
3,985.44*
1,545.99
1,545.99*
161. 00
161. 00*
32.31
32.31*
299.10
299.10*
164.56
529.62
694.18*
137.50
137.50*
29.07
4.68
7.01
10.84
108.57
622.34
11. 89
76.42
31.31
27.54
22.60
62.95
11.15
1,445.11
9.44
2,480.92*
30.51
30.51*
297.65
297.65*
2,101.68
2,101.68*
1,500.00
1,500.00*
125.39
125.39*
212.83
212.83*
45.00
45.00*
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
COUNCIL REGISTER
VENDOR
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS
<*>
PUBLISHER'S TOOLBOX INC
<*>
QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS CO
<*>
RATZLAFF CONSTRUCTION
<*>
RAY 0 I HERRON CO INC
<*>
RICE, TIM
<*>
RICHARDS ASPHALT COMPANY
<*>
RlVERCITY DEVELOPMENT
<*>
RON'S GOURMET ICE
<*>
ROSEMOUNT SAW & TOOL
<*>
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO
<*>
SAINT PAUL PIONEER PRESS
<*>
SCHNEIDER, BETH
<*>
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL INC
<*>
SOUTH SUBURBAN MEDICAL
<*>
SOUTHWEST PUBLIC SAFETY
<*>
SPECIALTY SCREENING
<*>
ST CROIX COUNTY
<*>
STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNION
<*>
STORDAHL, MATT
<*>
SUPERAMERlCA
<*>
T C CONSTRUCTION
<*>
THELEN, MARY JO
<*>
TOMLINSON, TRACI
<*>
ACTIVITY
GENERAL FUND
11-JUN-1998 (11:30)
DESCRIPTION
CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYSTEM
RECREATION PROGR OPER MAT & SUPPL
PERA
LIQUOR
MERCH FOR RESALE
ESCROW FUND ESCROWS PAYABLE
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES
PATROL SERVICES OPER MAT & SUPPL
STREET MAINT
SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES
OPER MAT & SUPPL
ESCROW FUND
LIQUOR
STREET MAINT
STREET MAINT
ADMINISTRATION
PERSONNEL
Recreation prog
SOLID WASTE
SWIMMING POOL
POLICE ADMIN
PATROL SERVICES
PATROL SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
GENERAL FUND
ESCROWS PAYABLE
MERCH FOR RESALE
OPER MAT & SUPPL
EQUIP MAINT/RENT
DUES & SUBSCRIP
PRINT & PUBLISH
OPER MAT & SUPPL
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
VEHICLE PURCHASE
VEHICLE PURCHASE
CHILD SUPPORT
ENGINEERING SERV TRANSPORT COSTS
ST CREDIT UNION
BUILDING INSPCT TRANSPORT COSTS
ENGINEERING SERV TRANSPORT COSTS
PATROL SERVICES TRANSPORT COSTS
RESCUE SQUAD TRANSPORT COSTS
STREET MAINT TRANSPORT COSTS
ESCROW FUND ESCROWS PAYABLE
Recreation prog OPER MAT & SUPPL
Recreation prog OPER MAT & SUPPL
9,558.70
9,558.70*
87.90
87.90*
1,272.80
1,272.80*
3,000.00
25.51
3,025.51*
92.10
92.10*
40.22
40.22*
138.02
138.02*
1,500.00
1,500.00*
1,029.85
1,029.85*
4.09
4.09*
141.35
141.35*
22.10
101.64
123.74*
30.00
30.00*
172.00
86.00
258.00*
45.00
45.00*
385.69
385.69*
370.43
370.43*
216.34
216.34*
2,104.16
2,104.16*
68.99
68.99*
96.76
11.70
750.03
27.87
112.27
998.63*
20,000.00
20,000.00*
36.00
36.00*
35.00
35.00*
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
COUNCIL REGISTER
11-JUN-1998 (11:30)
VENDOR
ACTIVITY
DESCRIPTION
CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYSTEM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANS ALARM INC SEWER OPEATIONS PROF SERVICES 162.74 OH
WATER UTILITY PROF SERVICES 182.97 OH
<..> 345.71"
TRIO SUPPLY COMPANY SWIMMING POOL OPER MAT & SUPPL 110.32 OH
<..> 110.32"
UNIQUE CONTRACTING SERVICE COR PARK IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION 22,181. 57 OH
<..> 22,181. 57"
UNITED WAY FUND OF ST. PAUL AR GENERAL FUND UNITED WAY 25.00 OH
<..> 25.00"
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES FLEET MAINT SERV OPER MAT & SUPPL 8.88 OH
SOLID WASTE OPER MAT & SUPPL 26.64 OH
STREET MAINT OPER MAT & SUPPL 53.28 OH
<..> 88.80"
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO OF AMER GENERAL FUND MEDICAL INS 197.30 OH
<..> 197.30"
VAN BLARCOM, BENJAMIN J. PARK MAINT EQUIP MAINT/RENT 30.75 OH
<..> 30.75"
W W GRAINGER INC SEWER OPEATIONS EQUIP MAINT/RENT 73.96 OH
<..> 73.96"
WINKLER, DANIEL SEWER OPERATIONS USER FEES 19.23 OH
<..> 19.23"
ZEE SERVICE COMPANY SWIMMING POOL OPER MAT & SUPPL 156.01 OH
<..> 156.01"
376,953.13" <..>
FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATI CAPITAL ACQUIS DEBT INT 3,715.00 TR
IMP BNDS 1996 DEBT INT 21,426.25 TR
IMP BNDS 1997 DEBT INT 21,845.63 TR
WATER UTILITY DEBT INT 54,350.65 TR
<..> 101,337.53"
101,337.53" <..>
APPROVALS:
RISTOW
GAMER
STRACHAN
CORDES
FITCH
~O--
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City
Administrato~
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P .E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Award Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary
Sewer/Charleswood Trunk Storm Sewer
Construction Contract
DATE: June 15, 1998
INTRODUCTION
Bids were received for the above referenced project on Friday, May 29, 1998.
DISCUSSION
Latour Construction, Inc. has submitted the low bid in the amount of $1,089,607.15. Based on this
bid and including contingencies and legal, engineering and administration costs, the total estimated
project cost is $1,752,600. The estimate from the feasibility study was $2,670,000.
BUDGET IMPACT
The total estimated project cost for the Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer is $1,615,800. Funding
for the Middle Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer will come from the Sanitary Sewer Fund and City SAC
charges. The total estimated project costs for Charleswood Trunk Storm Sewer is $136,800. Funding
for the Charleswood Trunk Storm Sewer will come from the Storm Water Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached resolution accepting the base bid of Latour Construction, Inc. in the amount of
$1,089,607.15 and award the project.
Respectfully submitted,
~M~
Lee M. Mann, P .E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
CitlJ. of FarminfJ.ton 325 Oale Street · Farmintjton/ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · F~ (612) 463.2591
j f1 j Bonestroo
~ Rosene
U Anderlik &
1 \J 1 Associates
Engineers & Architects
Bonestroo, Rosene, AnderHk and Associates. Inc. is an Affirmative Aceion/Equal Opportunity Employer
PrinCIpals: Otto G. Bonestroo, PE. . Joseph C Anderlik, PE. . Marvin l. Sorvala, PE, .
RIchard E. Turner, PE, . Glenn R, Cook. PE. . Robert G, Schunicht, P.E, . Jerry A. Bourdon, PE. .
Robert W. Rosene, PE. and Susan M, Eberlin, CPA.. Senior Consultants
Associate PrinCIpals: Howard A Sanford, PE . Keith A Gordon, P.E, . Robert R Pfefferle, P.E, .
Richard W. Foster, P.E. . DavId O. Loskota, PE . Robert C Russek, AI.A, . Mark A. Hanson, P.E. .
Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. . Ted K.Field. P.E. . Kenneth P Anderson. PE. . Mark R. Rolfs. P.E. .
Sidney P. Williamson, P.E., l.S. . Robert F. Kotsm,th . Agnes M, Ring. Michael P. Rau, PE, .
Allan Rick Schmidt. PE,
Offices: St. Paul, Rochester, Willmar and St. Cloud, MN . Milwaukee, WI
Websice: www.bonestroo.com
June 2, 1998
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024-1358
Re: Middle Creek Area
Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvements
BRA File No. 14182
Honorable Mayor and City Council:
Bids were opened for the project stated above on Friday, May 29, 1998. Transmitted herewith are ten (10)
copies of the bid tabulation for your information and file. Copies will also be distributed to each bidder.
The following summarizes the results of the five low bids received.
Low
#2
#3
#4
#5
Contractor
Latour Construction, Inc.
Northdale Construction Co, Inc.
S. R. Weidema, Inc.
Ryan Contracting, Inc.
Barbarossa & Sons, Inc.
Base Bid
$1,089,607.15
$1,123,648.26
$1,255,893.05
$1,350,392.55
$1,485,002.00
The low bidder on the project was Latour Construction, Inc. with a Base Bid of $1,089,607.15. These bids
have been reviewed and found to be in order. Therefore, we recommend that the project be awarded to
Latour Construction, Inc. for the Total Base Bid amount of $1, 089, 607.15.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. My direct number is (612) 604-4843.
Respectfully,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
c-Y:(h/~~ 12 ~L
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
GRC:jms:enc
2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, MN 55113 · 612-636-4600 · Fax: 612-636-1311
-
....
~
0:
<:s
.~
...
:s
~
:S
t::
..
....
oS
~
..
"'"
...
=
0
bo
=
'~
u.
'" ....
00 0
:!: ~
U
0 ...
Z ...
.!! =
~
Ii: 0
00
0\
~
'"
~ '"
>,
~ CO
~
~ ~
...
...
~ "0
... if
<Il
11 ~
2 en
1-0 ci
~ U
...
~ ::E
u
... p.;
:;; 0
"0
~ <:'1
...
v l>O
~ 0 ,5
Z Z =
v
- - C>.
u u 0
~ v
'(5' :g
..,~ ~
~
...
4.I:E~ J!!
~ .- :s
C4.lu
<I.I"'C 0 4;
~g~~ 04
~
...
..
..
c
............. 1 L...-""' 'g.
w
.....
Ltl ~
~ <::>
~ ~
13 ,~
c< ~
~ .~
~ ""
(.:) ~
"0
V
>
.;:;
u
v
t:t:
=
v
Z ;;
o <Il
- ....
E-o ~
j ~
~ ~
i:Q 0
-( ..J
E-o v
8 tE
i:Q ....
o
=
o
.~
:;
~
1-0
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 8
0 0 0 0
'3 .8 8 ci ci ~ ci ci ci vi ci ci 8 ~ ci ci ci 8 ci vi 8 ci 8 ci vi 8 ci 8 8
00 V) '" '" ... ... '" ... ... V) 00 '" .". I"'- .". I"'- 0\
V) 0\ '" .". '" 00 '" '" .". '" "'. .". 00 \0 '" 0 '" V) 00 \0 '" "". "1. '" \0 ... \0 ~
= 00 vi' 0 -D ~ N vi' vi' N 00 ~ 0\ 00 N 00 ~ -D ..,f ..,f N N '" ..,f
E-o ... ~
V) '" ... ... ... '" '" ... '" '" '" 0\ ... V)
... .... '" ...
~
" 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
III '" .;
~ c ... .. V) vi ~ vi 'l:i r...: cO a\ r...: 00 a\ ci ... N M ~ vi 'l:i a\ ci \0 ci ~ vi 'l:i r...: cO ci
0 :; 'a u 00
- 'C .". V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 V) \0 l"'- I"'- l"'- I"'- l"'- I"'- 00
Z ,.Q Ii ~ g., V)
"0 :;
i:Q =
i:Q tI:l
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 8 0 8
0 0 0
'; ~ ci ci ci ci ci ci 8 ci ci ci ci ci ci 8 vi 8 ci vi ci ci ci 8 ci ci ~ 8 8
.". 0\ '" '" '" 00 ... '" '" I"'- '" 00 .". \0 .". 0\ '" \0 V) 0
Q '" 0\ '" 0\ .". \0 l"'- I': I"'- .". '" 0\ V) ... ... \0 V) \0 I"'- ~ V) V) '" V) V) ...
vi' r-: '" ..,f ..,f N ... '" ..,f -D vi' r-: ~ N 0 00 r-: ... vi' 00 N -D 00
E-o I"'- ... - ... 0\ 00 ~ I"'- '"
.;
c
-
~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
.". .5 V)
tl ... .. ~ r...: r...: ~ r...: r...: r...: ci cO cO cO ci M 'l:i cO ~ vi cO a\ a\ a\ cO ci ci ci N vi vi
0 " 'a OJ ... ... ... ... ... '" ... ... ... '" '" '" '" .". .". ... ... ... '" V) V) V) V) V) V)
z ~ .. ~ 'C
C g., vi'
"0 >, = I"'-
i:Q g:: u
8 8 0 0 0 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 0 8 0 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 8 ~
V) V) V) V) V) V) 0 V) V) V) V) 0
8 'l:i vi M cO a\ 8 cO a\ cO cO cO S N vi r...: cO N a\ a\ M a\ r...: N r...: 8 ci
'3 0\ $ 0 \0 00 '" 00 ~ I"'- \0 \0 I"'- 00 S '" 0\ .". '" 00 0\ ~ '" \0 \0
00 \0 '" V) 00 0\ 0 .". 0\ \0 V) '" :1 '" O. \0 0\ I"'- 0\ I"'- 0 '" 00 "1.
.; = ..,f ~ ..,f -D vi' N N ... ..,f '" vi' r-: -D ~ ... ~ vi' N 0\ -D 0 00 00 -
c E-o \0 '" ... ... ... 0\ 0\ '" 00 .".
- '"
...
e
..
"0 8 0 V) V) V) V) V) V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 V) V) 0 ~ 8 0 V)
'" 'Ol 00 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 '" '" '" '" '" V) V) V) 0\ 0\ 0\ .". '" V) 00 0
0 ~ ... .. 00 ~ N N N N N N 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i ~ r...: r...: ci ci cO cO cO a\ N ~ r...: ci a\ cO
'a OJ ..,f
Z 'C '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .". .". V) V) '" '" '" .". V) V) V) \0 \0 \0
c:.: ~ g., \0
"0
i:Q en
8 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 V) 0 V) 0 0 V) 0 0 0 0 V) \0 8 0 0
'" V) V) V) V) 00 '" 00 I"'- '" V) \0 \0 .". 0\ 0\ '" 00 '" 0\ .". q 00
'; 8 ~ vi M 00 ~ 'l:i 00 ~ N cO ~ a\ 00 'l:i 'l:i a\ vi vi 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i vi a\ V) ci ... M
.; '" '" 0\ 00 \0 '" \0 .". I"'- ... V) ~ '" ~ \0 00 V) \0 0\ ~ 0\ 0\ 00 -
c Q V) '" \0 V) "". '" :2 V) .". "'!. 00 V) I"'- '" 0\ 0 0\ '" .". 00 0\ ~ - '" -
- E-o ~ 00 r-: ... ~ '" ..,f ... 00 -D 0\ r-: 0 ~ '" ~ vi' ..,f N 00 ... -D -D ~
Q ... ... '" ... ... - 0\ 0\ I"'- '"
U
c
.. ~ 8 ... V) V) V) V) V) V) l"'- I"'- l"'- I"'- l"'- I"'- l"'- I"'- l"'- I"'- ~ ~ 0\ .". '" '" '" '" '" 0\
N 'i u
2 ... .. 00 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) 0 '" CC! CC! CC! CC! CC! \0
0 "0 '= u V) vi a\ a\ a\ a\ a\ a\ 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i 'l:i vi vi vi M ... ... - ... - vi
Z -= ~ 'C ~ ... '" '" '" '" '" '" .... .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". '" '" '" .". V) V) V) V) V) V)
"0 .. ~ g.,
i:Q = =
z u
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 8 8 0 V) 0 0 8
"'! 0 0 q 0 0 0\ 0 0
'; ~ ~ vi ~ M 00 'l:i ci 'l:i 'l:i ci ~ N ... ci r...: 'l:i 00 00 00 M N vi a\ .". 'l:i ci N
'" '" 0\ 00 '" '" ... 0\ '" l"'- V) - 00 V) V) ... V) '" 0 V) 0\ .". r-: I"'- '" 0\
Q \0 0\ \0 - I"'- "". .". - "1. 0 .". \0 I"'- 00 .". l"'- V) V) \0 '" 00 0\ '" 00 \0 0 O.
.; E-o 0 ~ vi' '" 00 - '" '" ... r-: vi' 00 -D 0 ~ ~ N N N N ..,f N ... ..,f r-:
c .". '" - ... 00 00 I"'- '"
-
~
~ ~ 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0
.... OJ .. V) \0 <-: 00 0\ 00 0\ <'! '" \0 I"'- 0\ \0 00 0\ \0 V) I"'- 00 0\ \0
0 .. 2 ... '" M r...: a\ ... M vi 00 N ~ r...: a\ ... M 'l:i ci N 'l:i r...: ci N N ~ 'l:i 00 ci N ~
Z == a '= 'C 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .". .". .". V) V) V) '" '" '" .". .".. .". V) V) V)
s ~ g., .".
"0 " =
i:Q ..J U
~ ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V) 0 0 ~ 8 V) 0 V) 0 0 V) 8 0 0 ::: V) 0 0 8 0
'" I"'- ~ 0\ \0 .". 0\ 0\ .". ~ V) V) .". 00 '" V) I"'- '" \0 V) ~ '"
.". '" '" '" ... .". '" '" '" .". .". 0\. I': 00 I"'-
0 ... - '" ...
... ~ ~ ~ u. u. ~ u. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u. u. u.
'= <Il ~ U. U. ~ ~ ~ ~ u. ~ u. u. ~
~ ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J
V) V) V) V) \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 V) C>. C>. C>. C>. C>. C>.
V) V) '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" V) '"
'" V) '" t:t: t:t: t:t: V) '" t:t: "0 C>. "0 "0 "0 "0 "0
t:t: '" t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: '" t:t: ~ "0 ~ ~ ~ 00 ~
.. t:t: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t:t: 0 8
.. 0 0 0 ...
~ 0 <Il tI:l tI:l <Il tI:l <Il <Il tI:l <Il tI:l tI:l <Il tI:l <Il 0 tI:l , , , , , ,
<Il <Il Q, Q, Q, Q, Q, Q, Q, Q, Q, Q, Q, Q, <Il Q, '" , 8 '" ~ \0 ~
.. .go <Il . Q, Q,<Il Q, 00
tI:l .C>."O "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 ...
i .g.:.o", ~ \0 00 ~ ~ ~ 00 :0 '" ~ \0 00 :0 Q,"O ~ ..,f ..,f ..,f ..,f ..,f ..,f vi'
e ~ "0
~ o ... - ... ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <';' ~ 8 '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
~ ... , , , , , , , :.!.l .9 :.!.l :.!.l :.!.l :.!.l :.!.l
'a = , , :0 '" ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 00 :0 '" ~ \0 00 , 8
- ~ . 00 :0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
" 0 0 ... ... - ... '" '" '" '" '" U
tI:l '.:l u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" u" p.;- p.;- p.;- p.;- p.;- p.;- p.;-
. co u"
.... ~ > > > > > ~ ~ > ~ > > > > > > > > > > u ~ u u u u u
... :E > g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t: t:t:
.. 0 g., ~ ~
" ~ : 8 :0 8 8 8 <:> ~ <:> <:> <:> <:> <:> ~ <:> ~ <:> N N 00 "" "" "" "" ""
g., 00 ... ... ... ... - ... ... ... ... ... ... ... - '" '" '" ('l '" '"
0 ... ('l '" .". lI'l \0 I"'- 00 0\ 8 - ~ '" .". lI'l \0 I"'- 00 0\ 0 ... '" '" .". lI'l \0 I"'- 00
Z - - - - ... - ... - '" '" '" '" '" N ('l N N
...
~
ll:l
lS
N
00
...
:!:
888
f; g g
("I") ("'""I f'l"j
oO~M
on on
888
00 g'
on on
N. on
-o\vi
"" - ""
8 8 8
8' 0 0
on on
0'1 00 r-
v;; <""i'
-
~~~~~g~~~~~
;;;;~8~~vi':a~~88
('t'\C'I_tf"l OOOOV\V1
~ .. .....; N
8 8 8 8 $
gg~r;iE
"1"lr-"1.0\
f"""N \O~
- N
o ~
o 0
8888888
~~~~~~~
-~vi~c:"i-:-ti
8 8 8 88 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
8's? 8'0 g'lI'io 0 II'i g'lI'ill'i
'-" ("I") - V') .." M lI"'l N
""ooon~ ""0\0\0 r-on
",-:'M''''':M' N''''':a\N'''':O
00
88888888
g~~;,;;ig~~g
V')\O-oo r-oo
.,f .,fNN cO.,f
-8
g
on
.,f
~~88888
N r--:- 00 oci ....; 0 -i-
on N
N
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
8S<~S<~S<8~S<8S<~~o
~~~~~~d:oo~~~~~:i
"l:t('t'\ -.::tMVlM r-- ~ ~
888888888
OOOOOg'OO~'
\O\OV\oooo ooV')
('t'\ \0 "I:f' 00
. . vi' vi'
on ""
8 8
g g
on 0
Nvi'
on on
I""; ci
888888888888888~
~~~~~~~~~~~ga~~M
"I:t N V'l-O\O
.. ... ....: N"':
~ ~
- -
88888888
;,;;i~g;,;;i;,;;i:G~g
CSoo\Ooo-voo
vi' -0";"; -ON
""
8~888~88
~'Cf'iNMNNv-i~
--_ 00-
-
vi'
""
8~88888888888~
~r-ll'ioo;,;;ioooll'ioooa\
",,~~;q~o~o;g~~~8~
~on..;~~;i~"'" N r-:~
a~
~ '"
r- r-
~~~g~~~~~
onoo .ooooono
-O\\O~r--NO\\O
('t'\ \0 l.I"l V'l 0 tr'l ......
.....: ....: ~ N
- on
o ~
ci 0
88888888888888888~~
gggg~:G~g8ggg~gg~~~~
\OOO""OO~O'I~O'I""\Or-r-""NNN \0
" ",-o-.i..;"':N"'NN '..; NNN r.:
..... N .... 0\
888888888888888
gggg~~~;~gg~~gg
\0 ('t'\ OO-NM
....: .. ....: N M
5=:00
MOO
888~8~
~~~p;g~
r-r-ON('f)-
'" r-:";N
88~~~~8~
~ff"iMNo\M~M
r- N
'"
8 8
o 0
\0 N
on ""
r.:.,f
00-
00 on \0
loCi 00 N
~ 2:: :;;
d'li-.i
~ ""
8\O8~888888~
~~gp;gg~;,;;i~~&l
~\OOOO'lononNOr-O..;
~~~~f'"i'ft"i'''ri ~~
$$V')~~~~
:g:g~!::g)~g
C"'l"!.\CtC"'l
- -
8 8 8 8
g ~ ~;,;;i
Vlt"-MO
ffi"": N
o~
00
8~88~8~~
:;:g~~~$g~
oo..~~~~~~~__
N -
888888888~~
::~~~~~~8~~~
O'\tf"\l""'-V\('f'\lI"'lOOO\ V"I
"":M""":M' M"':~ '8.
88888888
g~~:d:d~:dg
It''l'OlI'''\ooOO-('t'\-
r-: oOMf'"i' ~M
8~~~~~
gN~~~N
on
r.:
8 ~
vi vi
~ -
8888888888888~
~001l'i08'o08'g'8'8'OO
NN""r-"" ~ onN
OONOOOO"'ltr--O\ ~-r-ovi
~~.n1g~~=~Mtti r-:~
g~8888~
\.Ciociovidl"'-:.o\
1I'\"'M 0\ 0\(""\ \0
onl"";,I"";,N
-
8 8 8 8
0'1 ' , ,
...:S<~8
-0\0-
...0 rri'
- on
o ~
o 0
8 ~ ~ ~
M 0 N..t
V'l \0 N M
"'!.
-
onoonoo
Q\OOO\O\N
o..toll'ioO
("l""l N ('t'\ V ......
888888
V'iociviN"'V"\
OOr-V'\<""lN('t'\
...... 1'-11"')00
....: ....: N''''':
~ 0 0
II'i 0 0
88888888
g' II'i 0 II'i II'i 0 II'i 8'
r-O'INNonr-
r-vo\o\--N
..; 'liNN r-:'li
8::~~~
~rri-:::::
..;
888
Cfi vi ...;
o ""
N
00
N on
r-\O
=~~
o
\0
N
N on
g~
",vi
r- -
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0.. 0..
.", .",
00 (:)
'7 ~
~ ~
",vi
~ ~
o 0
Q.;'Q.;'
u u
~ ~
~~
~ ~ ~
.8 oj oj
.8 :a ~
~ ~~"
~.g..g.
.S! 00 Co
~~~
~~~-ciU
NMNVi~
0:
00:I: '01
]~~e 0:
- bO ';n a 0
w~'E~~ ~
~ l 'B ~ ~ g ]
e.,soi'l1l:5
:tc..~l::t~u
o q) U en U
-= .", ~ "l:: ~ '-=
- :I: c: ... <> G
~~8~.3....
,~ ~ ~
r:i. > '3
.5 .... ~
O'\O-N~~lI")\of"""OOO\O-
N""""""""""""""""""""~~
s;g:=
R~~
~vi'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 88 8 8 ~
~~--i~dv\a\o\"";o.ndvir--:
"1.~~M~~~~~~~N~t;
-~~NN cr) ....~ ...:~
~~
r..: '"
0'1 N
~ on
-.iN
t--oO\---- -t'
~ ~ : oo~ oo~ -00' 00'; : C!
t:::tnNNNNNNN
I"";,
-
~:;::~;;;;88~o~
II'i r-:; '" II'i 0 M 0
~.. r-- r--:. ~~.. ~
- - -
88888~8
go;;~~~~~
r-""\ONOO~"on
"';~~~N-~
~888888~:a
~g~~gg~~:::i
"l-C""\O('f'1O'\ \0
-c-ri N'''':-.:i 00
r-
888
II'i r-: $'
00 ""
\0 0
cONN
8ggg~g~~~8~
8~~~('f'1~~~~~$
f"'oo.. C""\..
-
8 8 8 8
vi oci d 0
OO-V"lO\
In ...... 0 C"'\
...: N''':
~ 0 0
00
g:::g~~~~~_N~N('f'1
C"'l('l- tnN
~g~
c-riN'-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~
-
c..
N CI)
~ ]
-0 00 Oo:';l~
lil 0..0..0..0..0.. ~~bG~fl..
~.g..g.~"""""""".g.~.,s5.,s~& 0:
~oo~~~~~~~t~t&~ ~
tB~~~~~~ob.g.~.g.~~a ~
!~~~.,f.,fvi'vi'~.,f00~00~~~ Sr:i.
t::l ~" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "'::ci' a::ci' au'" :5.s e
...~~~~~~~~~~~~~~so~&8
~uuuuuuuuoj:I:~:I::~~~~N
~~Q.;'Q.;'Q.;'Q.;'Q.;'Q.;'Q.;'Q.;'~~~~~8~~~a
~ ~ u u u u u u u u - oj oj ,S _ ... ~
~_~~~~~~~~~~on~o..~~e~~
~~~~~~~~~N~-~-e~oe~o
Q.c C"'\ C""\ _ _ _ _ - _ - Cii :;.,. Vi in 0 0 Q.. ... :E r-
~~;~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~8
N 111 N N N
~~~~~G~~
......
.",
l!
2 u cu
u ~ ~ 0
~ll"!:liS~
~~~~I3
!:! ';;' ~ ~ .a
~ Sf~-::"'-a
:= 'u ~ is is 'C
f ~ ~ ,c: 0: ...
~ .l:> :l bO 8 '8 os
fJ~U)~:3Ee
;.",g;:E:Eg
.;. ~ .~ on "" ~ '~
...~a~&&a
~Oa:iO~~a:i
o N""~on\Or-
\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0
rl ...
~ g
- ~
~ -
0..'3
~ ,5;
~ !:!
.", .",
a a
... ...
> >
o 0
e e
... ...
~ ~
,jS
....i
00
:!:
8888888
?gg~g~g
OOOOMC$lI"lO('t')
o";";r-ioO":;
-"' -..... ..... ~
~888~
- ~ g ~
\0 '"
,.;-
8888888
~~~~~~~
~NOttiN"":-:-
--- --
-
~~888~
M lI"'i 0 d-
\0 '" '<T
.q- ::
8888888
ggg~ggcO
l-\Ooocotntn'8
..;o\,.;-o\r-i-or-i
N"'" ..... .....
-
~~~~~~
'" \0 '"
\0 ~
r-i
88~:il88~
~~g~~g~
OOI:'r--OOMM~
~o\~o\N~
~~~8~
..,; N";
..... \0 '<T
\0 '<T.
.....
8888888
gggg~g~
0000 tnMNV'lOO
O~a\r-i'~'V"~
N- -0\
~g888~
_N.novi
'" ..... \0
~ 00
88
:j\.Ci
..... ~ 0 S<
..... '" 0
~
~~~~~~
..
'"
~
'€
~
"0
;
..c
o "0
:; ~
e = '"
o ~ oS
.~ OJ .~
~ ~ l)
; ~ ~ ~
;.8,QQ.,
1ig~Ol
~Vllt~
'0 ....:
~ '0
o lS.
.9
-5-=
.~ .~
"011
o OJ
Vl en en
000-0
\0 \0 r--
r::~~
8 8 8 ~
,...: .,.; g ..;
r-- :;: '" ~
a\'ovi'ui
0\ 00 0 00
'" _ '<T
- ...
8 :::: 8 :::
<:) r...: vi N
O. ~ ~_ ..;
-,..: :;}
:10\-5
~ :::: 8 ~
~ ~ ~ g!
M Vl 0 00
~~~~
~ ~ ~ ""
o ,...: 0 ;;1
~ ~ ~ \h
..; ,..: .... ::i
~ 00 ~ ....
...
o on 8 ~
:! ~ 2 S
:a 00 \0
...ocO~~a\
0:. r-- 0'\ ~
...
..
'"
~ ~
Jl ~ a
~ en .~
.~ ~ ~
enVl~"O
,=
'" '" '"
1i 1i 1i ~
Q., Q., Q., lZl
01 01 01 '3
'00'0 0
1-0 1-0 1-0 ...
u
..s
v; 0-
= \0
o '"
~ ~\Or-
"<Jr--"~o-
~~Z:;;b
~~:alGlG
~~~;!;~
i%lQ.,O\o\o
U 0-
~t1l~
~ g ~
.= 5 ;z; 8
g<::E",
a-5~~
u ~ 0 ~
a8~~
~~~\O
0-
\0
zr;::
u g lI"l
..s 5 ~
g<
OJ -5
~ M
OJ -
~ -
.8
~\O
cI'i !::
ci
U
=
.S! ~
U CiS
~ OJ
= ..
o "0
U "E
OJ 0
:g z
'€ ~
o ::;J:
Z -
u 00
..s '"
. '"
= '"
o~'"
'€ z ~
.s~ .~r--
g~~o-o
U ~...l::;: ~
~u u~~
o~~oo
jN:a~~
J~
> -
o 0-
o 00
-a~
C<l '"
~~
'<T
r--
'"
'"
"'00
z~
~ :1;
ri '"
~;!;
~~
=
OJ
"0
~ .~ -g
Ii: Q., 0
:; 8 ~
~:> ~
8 ~ fi
'" tlll"O
'" .~ '0;; "0
~ t1l ~ a
00.. i%l
~ ~.~ "0
\0 1-0 > ~
C<l
'" e
g;.g
0\ ';j ~
~ ~ '5 a
~ 8] ~
\Oen_~
:.l2
'"
,Q
.!l
r-- ~ =
g: .g
'<T ..( '0;; "0
$ ~ ~ ~
~,g8"'O
\0 1-0 :> ~
'"
~
i%l
g
d 5
...l :s
~ ~"8
~ 8 ~
~:>~
>."0
.~ ~
o OJ
OJ -
en ~
"0 0
.- oS
i%l 0
tI! <(
'" C<l
"0
=
.g
~
i i
E <(
It
,eo ~ ~ >. OJ
~,gu.i%l~
'OJ Q.,
cii
6
U
Z
N
00
~
Proposed RESOLUTION NO. R -98
AWARD CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. 98-14
MIDDLE CREEK AREA TRUNK SANITARY SEWER,
PROJECT 98-15, CHARLESWOOD TRUNK STORM SEWER
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 15th day of June, 1998 at
7:00 P.M..
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following resolution:
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Middle Creek Area Trunk Sanitary
Sewer and the Charleswood Trunk Storm Sewer, bids were received, opened and tabulated
according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Contractor Total Base Bid
Latour Construction, Inc. ................$1,089,607.15
Northdale Construction Co. ............$1,123,648.26
S.R. Weidema, Inc. .........................$1,255,893.05
; and
WHEREAS, it appears the firm of Latour Construction, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The base bid of Latour Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation for $1,089,607.15 is
hereby accepted and awarded and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract therefore.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the
15th day of June, 1998.
Mayor
Attested to the
day of
,1998.
SEAL
Clerk! Administrator
/DcL
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City
Administrato~ .
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Water Reservoir Logo Update
DATE: June 15, 1998
INTRODUCTION
The new water reservoir construction is progressing. The issue of putting a City logo on the new
reservoir has been discussed in the past.
DISCUSSION
Staff brought the issue of a City logo on the reservoir to the Water Board at the last Water Board
meeting. The Water Board reiterated its position that a logo on the new reservoir would need to be
paid for by the City, not the Water Board. The issue is brought before Council one more time since
soon it will be too late to initiate a logo in the painting scheme.
BUDGET IMPACT
A simple black and white logo could possibly cost approximately $10,000. A more complex multi-
color logo could cost approximately $50,000. A more accurate estimate could be obtained if the
Council directs staff to pursue a logo cost estimate. No funding sources have been identified to this
date that would fund a logo on the reservoir.
RECOMMENDATION
For information only.
Respectfully submitted,
oz: 7h~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
I
CitlJ of FarminiJ.ton 325 Oak Street. Farmington, MN 55024 · (612) 463-7111 · Fax (612) 463-2591
(Db
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers,
City Administrator~
Lee Smick, Planning Coordinator
FROM:
DATE:
June 15, 1998
RE:
Comprehensive Plan
Update
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
The consultants from RLK, Inc. toured the City on June 1 st. The two-hour tour consisted of the
downtown area along with East Farmington, the Industrial Park, the rural area along Flagstaff
Avenue and the subdivisions of Limerock Ridge, Silver Springs, Prairie Creek, Troyhills and
Fairhills.
City staff has also assembled and delivered to the consultants community profile information
including population forecasts, existing and proposed transportation, housing and recreational
plans and GIS information for land use database mapping.
Over thirty-five interviews in total were held on June 11th, 12th and 15th and will assist in
generating topics and areas of discussion for the joint City Council and Planning Commission
visioning session workshops. The consultants have set the visioning session workshops for July
sth and 9th at 6:00 PM in the Council Chambers at City Hall.
The visioning workshops will be designed and facilitated by Jim Brimeyer. These will provide
forums for the presentation and discussion of ideas by citizens, business owners, landowners,
public officials, City staff and other members of the Farmington leadership. From these
sessions, the Shared Community Vision will be identified. It is imperative that the City Council
and Planning Commission attend both sessions to ensure that the visioning sessions are a
success.
ACTION REQUIRED
Informational only, additional updates will continue throughout the Comprehensive Planning
process.
Respectfully submitted,
er1l~
Lee Smick, AICP
Planning Coordinator
CitlJ of Farmington 325 Oak Street · Farmington, MN 55024 · (672) 463-777 7 · Fair (672) 463-2597
jOe
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Cable Franchise Negotiations Update
DATE: June 15, 1998
INTRODUCTION
Negotiations with Marcus Cable on the renewal of the City's Franchise Agreement are in process
and should be completed by late August/early September. Within the context of these
negotiations, several associated issues have been discussed with the cities of Apple Valley and
Rosemount that Council will need to consider.
DISCUSSION
A review of these issues include the following:
PubliclEducationlGovernment (PEG) Fees. Discussions have been held regarding the
implementation of a PEG fee within the new Cable Franchise Agreement. This fee essentially
allows the City to conduct programming activities related to public cable access. Currently,
Marcus Cable has indicated that funding for public cable access comes from gross cable profits,
while the cities believe that this fee is included in Marcus Cable's basic rates. This remains a
point of contention in terms of whether or not Marcus would reduce its rates by a corresponding
amount should the cities impose a PEG fee. According to Marcus Cable, this fee amounts to $
.25 per subscriber per month to underwrite the public studio costs located in Lakeville.
Marcus Cable has indicated its desire to transfer the responsibility of operating the public studio
to the member cities. The cities of Apple Valley, Rosemount and Farmington have tentatively
agreed to a concept of a PEG fee, as authorized under federal telecommunications law, but do
not, at this time, want the responsibility of assuming control and operation of a public studio and
related programming until the issues of capital grants and PEG fees are resolved. Instead, the
cities would propose incorporating the authority to charge a PEG fee in the franchise agreement,
but will not actually implement the PEG fee until such time as determined to be appropriate and
timely by the cities.
Joint Powers Agreement. The cities have also discussed forming a more formal relationship
through the enaction of a Joint Powers Agreement. This type of agreement would still allow each
city to have a separate franchise agreement, but would provide a more formal regulatory
framework in jointly cooperating on cable related issues in the cities of Apple Valley,
Rosemount and Farmington. Types of activities include public programming, facilities
CitlJ. of FarminiJ.ton 325 Oak Street · Farmington] MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fair (612) 463.2591
management, negotiations, franchise agreement enforcement and, at some point in the future,
shared staffing initiatives.
Currently, the cities are operating under a Memorandum of Understanding for the purposes of
negotiating a new franchise agreement. Ostensibly, a joint powers agreement would be similar to
the current ALF ambulance services agreement. The benefits relative to a joint powers agreement
on cable television activities would be substantial. City staff from Apple Valley and Rosemount
will be reviewing this proposed change in municipal relationship with their respective City
Councils.
Capital Grant. This element of the franchise negotiations with Marcus continues to be the most
difficult to obtain agreement on with the franchisee. Marcus contends that any capital grant
should come out of subscriber rates, while the cities position remains that any capital grant
originate out of current operating revenues and expenses, with no increase in subscriber rates.
Essentially, the cities oppose any effort by Marcus Cable to raise subscriber rates by the
equivalent amount of the capital grant. Mr. Creighton has already successfully negotiated this
approach with another cable company, and is strongly advocating that the same approach be used
with Marcus Cable.
BUDGET IMPACT
Capital grant proceeds will be used to underwrite new audio-video-recording equipment to be
installed in the City Council Chambers. These improvements would be made upon Council
approval of a new Cable Franchise Agreement with Marcus Cable.
ACTION REOUESTED
Council consideration of 1) incorporating the authority to impose PEG fees within the Cable
Franchise Agreement, and 2) forming a Joint Powers Agreement with the cities of Apple Valley
and Rosemount.
Staff update on Capital Grant issues is for Council information.
ohn F. Erar
City Administrator
file
Cc: John Gretz, Apple Valley City Administrator
Tom Burt, Rosemount City Administrator
IOct
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Environmental Contamination - Ash
Street Storm Water and Sewer
Discharges
DATE: June 15, 1998
INTRODUCTION
The City has been notified that standing water tested in the storm water drainage ditches located at 6th
Street and Ash Street is contaminated with sewer waste effiuent. The Mayor and City staff met with
County Commissioner Harris, Castle Rock Township Representative Angus and County environmental
management and engineering staff on Tuesday, June 9, 1998 to discuss a variety of issues associated
with ground water contamination.
Issues discussed at this meeting included both short and long-term action steps that will need to be
taken to mitigate the effects of the contamination.
DISCUSSION
Due to a Farmington City resident request, the Dakota County Environmental Management Services
Department tested standing water located in the County's right-of-way. Standing water located in
drainage ditches on the south side of Ash Street in front of three City residences beginning at 520 Ash
Street and ending at 608 Ash Street were sampled due to complaints of strong sewer odors emanating
from the water.
According to Dakota County, ground water is apparently being contaminated from as yet unidentified
failing private septic systems in Castle Rock Township. While the City had informed representatives
from Castle Rock Township and Dakota County last year that township residents were apparently
pumping septic system effiuent into the drainage ditches, the City had been notified that this practice
had stopped and that township residents were effectively pumping their respective systems.
The nature of the contamination taken from samples by the Dakota County Environmental
Management Department confirmed that high levels of fecal coliform bacteria was present in these
storm water drainage ditches. The implications of ground water contamination from failing septic
systems on private wells, and the ambient environment are significant as it may effectively pose a
significant threat to public health.
According to David Swenson, Supervisor of Water and Land Management with Dakota County, the
samples taken from the storm water ditches indicated that approximately 5,000 - 6,000 colonies per
hundred milliliter of fecal coliform were present. In terms of drinking water, 0 colonies per hundred
milliliter of fecal coliform is the standard threshold; a beach would be closed at 1,000 colonies per
hundred milliliter; and, typically, treated sewage will contain approximately 200 colonies per hundred
milliliter of fecal coliform. It was also indicated that water samples were taken near the top of the
CitlJ. of FarminfJ.ton 325 Oaft Street. FarminfJton, MN 55024 · (672) 463~77 7 7 · Fair (672) 463~2597
Mayor and City Council Members
Environmental Contamination - Ash Street Storm Water and Sewer Discharges
Page 2 of3
water level in the ditch, and it was suggested by Mr. Swenson that the probability of a more intense
reading would be present if samples had been taken towards the bottom of the ditches.
Private Well Systems
With respect to ground water contamination, many township residents utilize shallow private wells as
their main source of drinking water. Contamination of these private wells is a major source of concern
as ground water could adulterate drinking water and cause a variety of illnesses and maladies. The
County will be sending out notices to affected township residents and commercial properties along Ash
Street and east of Highway 3 on County 50 to the golf course suggesting that private wells should be
tested for contamination.
Private Septic Systems
The County has agreed to conduct a septic survey to ascertain which private septic systems are failing.
This survey is a first step in identifying where the ground water contamination is occurring. The
County has indicated that this survey will occur over the next two weeks. The City will be checking
the integrity of its lift station connections to confirm that no leaks are occurring.
Storm Water Drainage Ditches
Dakota County has indicated that it will fence off the affected drainage ditches beginning at 520 Ash
Street and ending at 608 Ash Street as a precautionary measure. Pumping of the ditches will occur as
necessary. It is the City's understanding that either the County or Township will most likely pay for
these activities. The City will continue to work cooperatively with the County and Township to
mitigate any of the short-term effects of the contamination. City staff has contacted affected City
residents to notify them of this situation and will keep them informed as necessary.
In light of the ground water contamination, it would not be feasible to consider storm water drainage
alternatives at this time.
Long-Term Options
Discussions at the June 9, 1998 meeting emphasized the need to look at long-term solutions and
options. A special joint meeting between the City Council and the Castle Rock Township Board has
been scheduled for Tuesday, June 9, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. to discuss potential solutions including whether
the Ash Street Reconstruction and Prairie Waterway III projects should be reconsidered at this time. In
light of the contamination, the provision of municipal utility services is perhaps the best long-term
solution available to resolve the current contamination situation.
Another option in the form of requiring township residents with failing septic systems to purchase
holding tanks was also discussed in lieu of proceeding with Ash Street Reconstruction and Prairie
Water Way III projects. This, obviously, would solve the septic system issues for the time being, but
other issues such as storm water drainage, on-going monitoring and testing of ground water would still
need to be considered.
Mayor and City Council Members
Environmental Contamination - Ash Street Storm Water and Sewer Discharges
Page30f3
BUDGET IMPACT
As Council is well aware, the City is not in the position to finance these projects without substantial
participation from Castle Rock Township, Dakota Fair Board and Dakota County, and to a lesser
extent the Dakota County Extension Service. Project financing detailing specific funding sources and
needs was presented to these jurisdictions in 1997.
It should be emphasized that 1997 project costs were based on the 1995 Feasibility Study and, if the
project should move forward, City staff would have to completely revise and update the feasibility
study prior to project negotiations being finalized with external jurisdictions. In addition, the City
would need to receive financial guarantees from these jurisdictions that the costs of developing a new
feasibility study would be shared on a proportionate basis regardless of final project outcomes. The
1995 Project Feasibility Studies were paid for entirely by the City.
While the urgency of the current situation is certainly driving the need to identify how these two
projects could be financed, the City will need to carefully consider and structure appropriate public
financing of these two projects. In addition, issues of annexation, substantial special assessments to
township residents, Dakota County agreeing to place this project back into their CIP schedule, and
legal guarantees from the Township and Fair Board would need to be resolved prior to any substantive
agreements being reached.
In the final analysis, it is difficult to detennine exactly what the financial costs to the City will be at
this time as a long-tenn solution is still under review. As was discussed at the June 9, 1998 meeting,
ground water contamination is most likely originating from private septic systems located in the
Township's jurisdiction. Unfortunately, ground water flows are not restricted to municipal and
township boundaries, and the City has a significant interest in the final outcome. In essence, ground
water contamination is a community issue that must be addressed collectively.
ACTION REOUESTED
For infonnation only. The Special Joint Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 16, 1998 will hopefully
result in some common understanding and agreement as to the direction of how these issues can be
effectively resolved.
000 F. Erar
ity Administrator
Cc: Castle Rock Township Board
Dakota County Fair Board
Dakota County Extension Service
[~
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City
~dministrato~
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E.,
Director of Public Wodes/City Engineer
SUBJECT: County Road 72 Feasibility Report,
Project 98-21
DATE: June 15, 1998
INTRODUCTION
Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report requested by Council addressing the improvements
associated with the proposed tumback of County Road 72 to the City.
DISCUSSION
The City Council has requested this report to determine the feasibility of reconstructing County
Road 72 from Trunk Highway 3 easterly to the border of Farmington and Empire Township. From
Trunk Highway 3 to approximately 1300 feet east, County Road 72 exists as a paved rural section
with gravel shoulders and ditches. The remaining 2000 feet of roadway is a gravel rural section.
Dakota County has expressed an interest in turning back County Road 72 to the City of Farmington
and Empire Township. The County has also indicated that they would participate financially in a
County Road 72 street improvement project within the City limits as part of the tumback agreement.
This report describes the street, water main, sanitary and storm sewer improvements required to
serve existing and future properties along County Road 72 between Trunk Highway 3 and the
eastern City limits. This report provides detailed cost estimates, a financial review, plan views of the
improvement area and a project schedule.
BUDGET IMP ACT
The estimated total project cost is $1,474,200. As stated previously, Dakota County is interested in
turning the portion of County Road 72 that is in the City back to the City. In discussions between
City and County staff, it has been indicated by the County that the County would be willing to
participate in the costs of the improvements as outlined in their Transportation Policy as part of a
tumback agreement with the City. The remaining costs would be funded through the City's funding
mechanisms.
There are two distinct sections to the road project, a section that will be reconstructed and a gravel
section that will entail new construction. The two sections will be addressed separately as the
funding mechanisms are unique to each section.
CitlJ. of Farmington 325 Oak Street. Farmintjton, MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7111 · Fa/( (612) ~63.2591
Reconstruction. Sta. 0+00 to 13+65 (TH 3 to easterly Hospital property line)
In the reconstruction area, there are two township properties that are adjacent to the County Road.
Per the County's policy, the County would fund 100% of the roadway costs in front of the Township
and 55% of the roadway costs in front of properties in the City. The water main, sanitary sewer and
storm sewer would be assessed 100% to the benefitting properties per the City's Special Assessment
Policy. The township properties could not be assessed until such time they come into the City. The
following table outlines the funding breakdown.
Funding Source
Item County City Assessed Total
Roadway Improvements $256,400 $96,000 $51,700 $404,100
Water Main $31,100 $31,100
Sanitary Sewer $104,200 $104,200
Storm Sewer * $35,400* $35,400
Miscellaneous Costs $1,900 $1,900
Total $256,400 $96,000 $224,300 $576,100
New Construction. Sta. 13+65 to 33+00 (easterly Hospital property line to easterly City limit)
This section of roadway is adjacent to two developing areas and a section of the Prairie Waterway.
The County would participate in 55% of the roadway costs, leaving 45% of the costs to be funded
otherwise. In accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy, new roadway construction and
utility installation is 100% assessed and it is recommended that the developments on either side of
County Road 72 split the remaining costs that the County does not fund. The developments in
question are East Farmington and Bristol Square (formerly the Adelmann property). The exact cost
split would be calculated and made part of the respective Development Contracts. The following
table outlines the funding breakdown.
Funding Source
Item County Assessed Total
Roadway Improvemems $280,100 $229,200 $509,300
Water Main $117,700 $117,700
Sanitary Sewer $65,900 $65,900
Storm Sewer * $202,700* $202,700
Miscellaneous Costs $1,900 $1,900
Total $280,100 $617,400 $891,500
* The County will participate in some of the costs of the storm sewer; however, the amount will
need to be determined during the preparation of plans and specifications.
2
__...~u,_
[]
--II
I
~. !
-_uT"
i
r......
!
i 000
FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA
COUNTY ROAD 72 IMPROVEMENTS
FIGURE 1
Scale In feet
. fl. Bonestroo
~ Rosene
G Anderlik &
. \J' Associates
Engineers & Architects
LOCATION PLAN
\141800\141LOCAT.DWG 6/1/98
141800
PL
33'
1 '
8'
8'
BITUMINOUS PATHWAY
NORTH
B618 CONCRETE
CURB & GUTTER
TYPICAL SECTION
CL
PL
VARIES
16'
16'
VARIES 5'
1 '
CONCRETE WALK
SOUTH
1 1/2" PE 41 BITUMINOUS WEAR
3" TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS BASE
8" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5. 100% CRUSHED
24" SELECT GRANULAR
TYPICAL SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE 2
a Bonestroo
Rosene
a Anderlik &
1 \.11 Associates
Engineers & Architects
FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA
COUNTY ROAD 72 IMPROVEMENTS
\ 141800\ 141 LOCAT,DWG 6/1/98
141800
If the Council elects to continue to the next step of this project, a meeting will need to be set up with
the County to verify the terms of the tumback agreement. Then, staff will hold a neighborhood
meeting at which estimated assessments would be presented. After the neighborhood meeting, the
Council would decide whether to continue with the project and schedule a public hearing. The
proposed schedule is as follows:
Receive Feasibility Report/Authorize neighborhood meeting June 15, 1998
Hold neighborhood meeting June 22 - July 10, 1998
Authorize Public Hearing/Set Date July 20, 1998
Hold Public Hearing/Order project, Authorize preparation of plans and August 17, 1998
specifications
Approve plans and specifications/Authorize advertisement for bids October 5, 1998 - February
1, 1999
Accept Bids/Award Contract March 1, 1999
Begin Construction June 1, 1999
Complete Construction September 31, 1999
ACTION REOUESTED
Adopt the attached resolution:
1. Accepting the feasibility report;
2. Authorizing the scheduling of a neighborhood meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
;ftt ftt ~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
3
Proposed RESOLUTION NO. R -98
ACCEPT FEASIBILITY REPORT
SCHEDULE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
PROJECT NO. 98-98-21 -
COUNTY ROAD 12 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota,
was held in the High School Auditorium of said City on the 15th day of June, 1998 at 7:00 P.M.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
Member
introduced and Member seconded the following resolution:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 40-98, a report has been made by the City's Consulting Engineer with
reference to the following improvement;
Proiect No.
98-21
Description
Street & Utility Improvements
Location
County Road 72, from TH 3 easterly
to where it turns north at the Prairie
Waterway and northerly to the City
limits
WHEREAS, the City's Consulting Engineer has prepared a report advising the Council in a preliminary way as to
the feasibility and cost of such improvement, a copy of which is now before the Council.
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective,
and feasible.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The feasibility report is hereby accepted.
2. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the
assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1 ,474,200.
3. Staff is directed to schedule a neighborhood meeting.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 15th day of June,
1998.
Mayor
Attested to the
day of
,1998.
(SEAL)
City Administrator/Clerk
Report for
County Road 72
Street and Utility Improvements
Farmington, Minnesota
June, 1998
File No. 141-98-800
~ f1 ~ Bonestroo
~ Rosene
ill Anderlik &
~ \I ~ Associates
Engineers & Architects
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and ASSOCIates, Inc. is an Aff"mative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer
Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. . Joseph C. AndPrlik, I'E, . Marvin L. Sorvala, I'E. .
Richard E. Turner, !'E. . Glenn R. Cook, I'E . Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. . Robert G. Schunicht, PE .
Jerry A. Bourdon, PE. . Robert W. Rosene, P.E. and Susan M. Eberlin, c.PA., Senior Consultants
Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford, PE. . Keith A. Gordon, PE. . Robert R Pfefferle, PE. .
Richard W. Foster, PE. . David O. loskota, PE. . Robert C. Russek, A.I,A. . Mark A, Hanson, P.E. .
Michael T. Rautmann, P.E, . Ted K.Field, PE. . Kenneth I' Anderson, P,E. . Mark R. Rolfs, PE, .
Sidney P Williamson, PE., L.S. . Robert F Kotsmith
Offices. St. Paul, Rochester, Willmar and St. Cloud, MN . Mequon, WI
June 8, 1998
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Re: Feasibility Report
County Road 72
Street, Storm, Sanitary, and Water Main Improvements
Our File No. 14193
Dear Mayor and Council:
Enclosed for your review is our Report on the County Road 72 street and utility improvements for
the area located between Trunk Highway 3 and the easterly City limits.
This report describes street, water main, storm and sanitary sewer improvements necessary to serve
existing and proposed properties along County Road 72. The street and utility improvements in this
area are necessary because of the proposed residential developments north and south of County Road
72. The improvements are practical because the County will share in the construction costs and
sanitary sewer and water will be provided to properties currently served by wells and septic systems.
Cost estimates for the proposed improvements are presented in the Appendices.
We would be pleased to discuss this report further with the City Council or City staff at any mutually
convenient time.
Respectfully submitted,
BC, .;ESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK AND ASSOCIATES, INe.
~Q0~
Tom P. Kellogg
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am
a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
~~ If' (::n~
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
Date: June 8. 1998 Reg. No. 9451
2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, MN 55113-3898 · 612-636-4600
Table of Contents
Page No.
Letter of Transmittal
1.
Table of Contents
2.
Introduction
3.
Discussion
4.
Cost Estimates
7.
Project Financing
8.
Conclusions and Recommendations
10.
Appendix A - Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Cost Estimate
Project Cost Tracking Sheet
County Road 72 Street and Utility Improvements
2
Introduction
The City Council has requested this report to determine the feasibility of reconstructing County Road
72 from Trunk Highway 3 to the border of Farmington and Empire Township as shown on Figure
1. From Trunk Highway 3 to approximately 1300 feet east, County Road 72 exists as a paved rural
section with gravel shoulders and ditches. The remaining 2000 feet of roadway is a gravel rural
section. An existing trunk sanitary sewer running north and south crosses County Road 72
approximately 1400 feet east of Trunk Highway 3. City sewer currently serves properties south of
County Road 72 and west of the trunk sewer. An existing 8-inch water main is located along the
south side of County Road 72 between Trunk Highway 3 and the trunk sanitary sewer. The water
main provides service to all of the properties south of and some of the properties north of the
roadway. This report describes the street, water main, sanitary and storm sewer improvements
required to serve existing and future properties along County Road 72 between Trunk Highway 3
and the eastern City limits. The proposed street and storm sewer improvements are shown on Figure
4. Proposed sanitary sewer and water main improvements are shown on Figure 3. Costs for the
proposed improvements and the proposed financing details are presented in this report.
County Road 72 Street and Utility Improvements
3
Discussion
Background
County Road 72 is located east of Trunk Highway 3 and north of Elm Street in the eastern part of
Farmington as shown on Figure 1. The roadway is paved from Trunk Highway 3 to the eastern lot
line of the hospital property. The remaining roadway between the hospital property and Empire
Township is gravel. The existing street section is rural with ditches and no storm sewer. A trunk
sanitary sewer running north and south crosses County Road 72 just east of the hospital property.
The sewer currently serves all development south of the roadway. Properties along the north side
of County Road 72 are served by on site septic systems. An 8-inch water main exists along the south
side of the roadway between Trunk Highway 3 and the sanitary crossing. The water main provides
service to all properties on the south side and some properties on the north side of County Road 72.
Dakota County has expressed an interest in turning back County Road 72 to the City of Farmington
and Empire Township. The County has also indicated that they would participate financially in a
County Road 72 street improvement project within the City limits as part of the turnback agreement.
Street Improvements
The proposed design speed for County Road 72 is 30 miles per hour (mph). The radius on the curve
to the north at the east end of the roadway would be increased to 220 feet and constructed with a
super elevation. The curve would be posted with a 25-mph advisory sign. The alignment of the
reconstructed road would be centered in the right-of-way. The proposed pavement section (Figure
2) for County Road 72 is presented below:
1 W' Type 41 bituminous wearing course
3" Type 31 bituminous base course
8" Aggregate base, Class 5, 100% crushed rock
24" Select granular material
B618 Concrete curb and gutter
City crews recently dug test holes at 5 locations along the roadway to determine what types of
materials are present beneath the existing roadway. The results indicate that approximately 3-feet
of organic material and 1- foot of clay/loam exist beneath the roadway. Sand was present beneath
the clay/loam layer. All organic and clay materials within the roadway would be excavated and
replaced with suitable granular material.
County Road 72 Street and Utility Improvements
4
It is proposed that a 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk be constructed along the south side of the
roadway I-foot north of the right-of-way. The sidewalk would extend easterly from Trunk Highway
3 to a point near the Prairie Waterway where it could be connected to the exiting path east of the
project at some time in the future. An 8-foot wide bituminous pathway is proposed along the north
side of the road from Trunk Highway 3 to the border of Empire Township and Fannington.
Storm Sewer Improvements
As part of the street reconstruction on County Road 72, storm sewer is proposed to be constructed
to improve drainage along the street as shown on Figure 4. Storm drainage on the west end of the
roadway would be directed to an existing storm sewer manhole in the southeast quadrant of County
Road 72 and Trunk Highway 3. The remaining drainage on the roadway would be directed easterly
to a low point in the road at the curve. This storm water would then be directed easterly to a
proposed pond where sediments can be removed prior to the water reaching the prairie waterway.
The pond will be constructed by others as part of the East Fannington 4th Addition development
project.
Water Main Improvements
The existing 8-inch CIP water main along County Road 72 serves all properties south of and most
properties north of the roadway. It is proposed that water services be provided to all properties on
the north side of County Road 72 that currently have no water service. Water services would also
be provided to the vacant properties for future development. An 8-inch water main would be
constructed to the north side of the road at the west end of the project. The water main could be
extended along the frontage road to provide service for future commercial development of the site.
All other water services would be I-inch copper to serve future residential development. The
existing 8-inch water main would be extended easterly approximately 1350 feet to serve future
developments north and south of the County Road and east of the existing developed area. The
water main extension will be aligned lO-feet south of the centerline of the road. Eight-inch tees and
stubs will be extended to the south right-of-way at three locations east of 12th Street. An 8-inch stub
would also be extended to the north right-of-way east of 13th Street to allow looping for future
development to the north. A 16-inch by 8-inch cross will be installed at 12th Street and I6-inch stubs
extended to the north and south right-of-way in accordance with the City's Water Supply and
Distribution Plan. The proposed water main layout is shown on Figure 3.
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Sanitary sewer will be extended east and west from the existing trunk line that crosses County Road
72 at 11 th Street. The sanitary extensions will follow the centerline of the proposed roadway. The
line to the east would be extended to a point just east of 13th Street to serve the future East
County Road 72 Street and Utility Improvements 5
Farmington 4th Addition as shown on Figure 3. Future development north of the County Road and
east of the trunk sewer will connect to the trunk line at a point north of County Road 72.
Construction of the lateral line west from the trunk line to the intersection at Trunk Highway 3
would provide sewer service to the existing properties north of the County Road. Sewer services
will be stubbed to the lot lines for all existing homes and future development on the north side of the
roadway west of the existing trunk line. It is proposed that a 6-inch sewer stub be provided for
possible future commercial development of the property at the northeast corner of County Road 72
and Trunk Highway 3.
County Road 72 Street and Utility Improvements
6
Cost Estimates
The project costs for these improvements are outlined in this section. Estimated construction costs
have been provided for street and utility improvements east of and west of the existing trunk sanitary
sewer crossing. The itemized cost estimates are provided in the appendix. Cost estimates for this
report are based on 1998 construction costs and can be related to the May, 1998 ENR Construction
Cost Index of 5881. A summary of the estimated costs for the proposed improvements is presented
below. The costs presented include 10% for contingencies and 27% for engineering, legal and
administration.
Estimated Project Costs
Item Sta. 0+00 to 13+65 Sta. 13+65 to 33+00
(Reconstruction) (New construction)
Street Improvements 404,100 509,300
Water Main 31,100 117,700
Sanitary Sewer 104,200 65,900
Storm Sewer 35,400 202,700
Miscellaneous Costs 1,900 1,900
$516,100 $891,500
TOTAL ESTIMATED COMBINED PROJECT COST
$1,414,200
County Road 72 Street and Utility Improvements
7
Project Financing
As stated previously in this report, Dakota County is interested in turning the portion of County
Road 72 that is in the City back to the City. In discussions between City and County staff, it has
been indicated by the County that the County would be willing to participate in the costs of the
improvements as outlined in their Transportation Policy as part of a turnback agreement with the
City. The remaining costs would be funded through the City's funding mechanisms.
There are two distinct sections to the road project, a section that will be reconstructed and a gravel
section that will entail new construction. The two sections will be addressed separately as the
funding mechanisms are unique to each section.
Reconstruction, Sta. 0+00 to 13+65 (TH 3 to easterly Hospital property line)
In the reconstruction area, there are two township properties that are adjacent to the County Road.
Per the County's policy, the County would fund 100% of the roadway costs in front of the
Township and 55% of the roadway costs in front of properties in the City. The water main, sanitary
sewer and storm sewer would be assessed 100% to the benefitting properties per the City's Special
Assessment Policy. The township properties could not be assessed until such time they come into
the City. The following table outlines the funding breakdown.
Funding Source
Item County City Assessed Total
Roadway Improvements $256,400 $96,000 $51,700 $404,100
Water Main $31,100 $31,100
Sanitary Sewer $104,200 $104,200
Storm Sewer * $35,400* $35,400
Miscellaneous Costs $1,900 $1,900
Total $256,400 $96,000 $224,300 $576,700
* The County will participate in some of the costs of the storm sewer; however, the amount will
need to be determined during the preparation of plans and specifications.
County Road 72 Street and Utility Improvements
8
New Construction, Sta. 13+65 to 33+00 (easterly Hospital property line to easterly City limit)
This section of roadway is adjacent to two developing areas and a section of the Prairie Waterway.
The County would participate in 55% of the roadway costs, leaving 45% of the costs to be funded
otherwise. In accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy, new roadway construction and
utility installation is 100% assessed and it is recommended that the developments on either side of
County Road 72 split the remaining costs that the County does not fund. The developments in
question are East Fannington and Bristol Square (fonnerly the Adelmann property). The exact cost
split would be calculated and made part of the respective Development Contracts. The following
table outlines the funding breakdown.
Funding Source
Item County Assessed Total
Roadway Improvements $280,100 $229,200 $509,300
Water Main $117,700 $117,700
Sanitary Sewer $65,900 $65,900
Stonn Sewer * $202,700* $202,700
Miscellaneous Costs $1,900 $1,900
Total $280,100 $617,400 $891,500
* The County will participate in some of the costs of the stonn sewer; however, the amount will
need to be detennined during the preparation of plans and specifications.
County Road 72 Street and Utility Improvements
9
Conclusions and Recommendations
The proposed improvements described in this report are feasible as they relate to general engineering
principals and construction procedures. The feasibility of the project as a whole is subject to the
financial review. Based on the information contained in this report, it is recommended that:
1. That this Report be adopted as the guide for County Road 72 street and utility
improvements.
2. That the City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project.
3. The following schedule be implemented for the project:
Receive Feasibility Report/Authorize neighborhood meeting June 15, 1998
Hold neighborhood meeting June 22 - July loth, 1998
Authorize Public Hearing/ Set Date July 20, 1998
Hold Public Hearing/Order project, Authorize preparation of August 17, 1998
plans and specifications
Approve plans and specifications/Authorize advertisement for October 5, 1998-
bids February I, 1999
Accept Bids/Award Contract March 1, 1999
Begin Construction June 1, 1999
Complete Construction September 31, 1999
The scheduling of the project and the financing of the project is dependent on the City and
the County and the City and the adjacent Developers entering into an agreement on this
project. Meetings will be scheduled with the County to further discuss the agreement and
the timing of the agreement before the Public Hearing.
County Road 72 Street and Utility Improvements
10
Appendix
/' (') '1 ~)
~ )>
oj:. 0 )>
c ;0 Z
co s:::
0 z
0 ~ - ~
/' Z
~ C)
oj:. -I ;0
co ;0 0 -<
0 0
0 Z
AI )> . (/)
t.,.J 0
0 s::: fTl
::ii' '.I - ~
C> Z
N fTl
Z ;0
O'l fTl
"'- s::: (f)
"'- -0 0 )>
to
co ;0 S; Z
0 0
<
fT1 ~
s:::
fTl )>
Z -l
-I fTl
tf) ;0
0 ~
0
;;:: )>
;;::
~ Z
oj:.
to ~
t.,.J
-0
;0
0
<
fTl
~
fTl
Z
-l
(/)
(f)
()
o
(1)
:J
-+,
(1)
(1)
.......
'1
C)
C
;0
fT1
<..N
i~=~
lb
ii1 ::to::to::o OJ
Ilo ~:JOO
:to Og.~~
g. Q. ~::J (J)
:;;~. l.\) ~CD S-
CD 0
(J) Qo 0
-'-"--7"-'- ~._---- [ j ~llll
___._____.u ______._
I
~-,-'" --~..-..- ~- ----L.........~
--~THI9TEi-~TH-~i.'
I
- ...L '-i ..J ..- -,- Ll ....-1]... ...
I 1 I
"::.fI" -...-., I
o I I
~ - ,-' "'~~'~""L_ ,_ i- -
:j I ! I LQ.-~--~
,m m,,1-' '''1 \ r I ;
y 1-- I
- -E)"l 8 I
01 ~J 1 I
_ ..__ _ '.. "__,, _, ,m "..m l.., ..~.., .... 1..., .." L __.,
I
I
_ ,,_ ,__......1.
o
N
o
o
..p-
O
o
-- ---- 1 ~-: --- . - -- - - ---n-----~---'i---'-' -- _'___ n_..
- ~ II ~'l :TRUNK HIGHWA Y 13 \" _m\,..___ 7-\
,,_W. I \ /
Cl il, /
_ L_~ I \ (_-.------"
-- f~]" ,.., "'I ~ 0): I \ r
CJ ~ l;olJ I \
~Rl 1<< I \ ~/--
, " .... . <;In _ 0 0 \ \
~ I fll I \
1 \
....- .. ..,.., .. ,- -I I \
I I \
I i \
-.., B-~w -Ll-j I \
03tJ6 B I ! \
~\;<;:,fj: ! \
0...,______
tf;- ~A~~ _j
~ 0-26..0
.._.C__~
.. _~.5El ~_ ~_[~
",.,.... ....._- ._--.. ,,'
I
I I
.....;t:f - ~ :1 \
OBOrr [ifJ ~ q \
-----~ 'I
.. ':~-~....~f~ 'I \
-~j~~! L-/~+..---J~
ExTS"pvc - -@-- \
'I
'I
'I
\
\
\ .------
,--\
1 \
I I 9\
I : \
I : \
1 lJ fll \ lJ lJ fll fll
:~~~~~~
IOzOOzz
I ~ CJ ~,~ CJ CJ
1 0 ~ 0 \0 (f) ~ ..-
, <::)> (f) ~ ::- -)>- .-
)>< -I)> --Z-I
1 fll - fll
I r;i:;o z ~\:;: ;0
"'--:;0 -1:;0\ \:;0
1 (f))> 1-< s::
1 (f) ~ :;0 ~ \, ~
I ~~-<~~z
O(f)Z'
I ~fll fll I
I ~ ~ :;0,\
I \
, :;0 \ \
i .
, \ \
\\
\\
\,
\\
\,
\\
\\
\\
\\
\ \
'I,
__ _..___lL
[]
.. '-----Jt
~ l- 1 r-
,\) ..1 r : CXJ CXJ
-.j 'ox
I r--J i. - CXJ u
I_J~L ~",_,~ _lJ -I: ~)
I : Z f1l ~~
[J: fll
I
I _L~,_
1
1
I
i
D
L.)
D
,
ru
-.j
-Jf
I -LJ,
uj
I
1
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
,
\
\
l
I
\
\
\
u
"
- -- .. .....-- ... --?- -- - -.~j
ru
'" ,
,
(f)~
fll)>
;0-1
<fTl
0;0
Gl~
)>
z
---@
TWELFTH ST.
w
f\)
f\)
- -----r---..--l -.- -----1" u ---- ---
I I
ii' i
~.L ,...J_ - L'f -.- ..il...,_-
~ 1 CXJCXJ 1 1 I
---1 :: I I
-; I ~ fu: r,:"~..\:E:,~,~'::,:~:.. ...1
,- -- -;J ".j - -I '
'f-I (f)~ 1
,... no 'Tfr,l.."... ,
I C! .
.---II
101
I -Z I
(Xl
lJ
<
o
.....CXJ
m :
:x
0......
-0)
lJ -
-6
z;o
o
R'Ul
Ul
(f)
D
D
I
ru
,n
(')
o
c
Z
-I
-<
;0
o
)>
o
-....j
N
........._...,..,............_...._-~
ICXJ
-<:
OX
Z L ;00:
)>-i
ZfTl
-Ifll
\--_ J
\---
\
\
\
\ -- .-"
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
'I
\
\
'I
\
I
\
I
'I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I I
i ~
I
fTl
C)
fT1
Z
o
--I ,- '-u-.-----~--l
I
I
j
./ () 'l (f)
~ 0 )> -j
.j:>.
c ;::0 0
co ~
0 z ;0
0 --l -
./ Z ~
~ -< C)
.j:>.
;::0 --l (f)
CO 0
0 0
0 Z rrJ
;u )> - ~
.j:>. 0
0 ~ rrJ
:;E -....J - ;0
(;) Z
N
Z )>
Q) [Tl
"'- ~ (J) Z
"'- -U 0 0
to
co ;::0 --l
0 )> (f)
< -j
[Tl ;0
~
[Tl rrJ
Z rrJ
--l -j
(J)
n ~
0 \J
s::
s:: ;0
0
~ <
.j:>.
co rrJ
0 ~
0
rrJ
Z
-j
(f)
(f)
()
o
(1)
:J
-+.
(1)
(1)
r-t-
'l
C)
C
;::0
[Tl
..p..
f~C~
iil :b:b:lJ OJ
Qo ~6.~g
~ g (J) (J) (J)
9- ~. ~ ~ en
~. ...;:.;: ".. !"to
l!!"'" a
lit m Qo 0
\
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\e --
\ \
\
\\
\\
\\
\\
\1
I.
'I
\1
\\
\\
\\
\\
\\
\1
\
\\
\\
\\
1\
\\
\i
_\1.._ .
fTl
Z
o
o
o
Z
(f)
-l
:;0
C
o
:::!
I ~
:j
1
1
-- - - -- - - --- - - -
-- ------- -- --
--)) ~ [~_.-J -_~~~j t j
/ \ -----_..._,_.......".,..~ -....----...... ,......:..::=....-
"
~.~~~~-~y: -, . :_~~-~-~.=":~~.:.~~-,
.._m r
I ~.._'.- iTRUNK
I [j !
I'"
L _,j
I
,
, ,
! I'!
, ,
(- ,
I : I'!
I "
I ,
I I'
- - -, -~.., I' !
, "
1 "
, ,'I
I I
, I
HIGHWAY
13
I
o
N
I
I\J
Ul
o
[J
I
1m
18
Iz
10
10
'Z
I~
.., .... B- - ~-i ~
, ' 03"="6 I 0
'=' :::l
'! ..,.... 040:'26 U -j ~
I: .::..-, -- - --= J
,i -ECP--,--J
I: ~. ....L~t:~ ~~
': , ;
~_ Ii '-. ---1
Ii
I I
I',
/-'
( :11
) I
Ii
,
'I
,
I
I
I
ii
I
ji
,
ii- /c:
':
,
,
I
I
\
\
\ ----
I .--
,--\
I \
1 \
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
!
i
o
?
I\J
'"
i
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
!
r
u
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
\..
1
C}
w
C}
,
f\)
....,
[ r-
r '1 ]
,. .._-- )
I ~ 7JLJ
'.'-1 III
<>
;::J
I
I\J
'"
r
I
\
\.,
r-
u .J
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
= -'~ "'~h..l
()l
0
0
z
0
;0
fTl
-1 , ~
, fTl
, ,
~
)>
r::...
^
I OJ \
~'-"~~2~ - ;: ~. \
-----~c \
': "L;l~2~" u3ql ~ \ .
.. ~ C I
.. O;~~~m .----'1 ~ \
___"::....-::-m. :::: ,...1 ~ - -- - - -, -,~.., - .---- ~-- ~
~ \
)> .
~ I
\
I
\
I~'
,..~
l..
o
TWELFTH ST.
T'----:------r-T--
<t i I
r 0'/0 I I ,
- ...L.,..J_-Lr.'--'''l'---
X\ .
I Y': 1 i
---1 ~ I
I ~ __l_....
.__........._j % J..,.... !'.....
1 /0 I i
,... ....-, T .,.1...,.... ...~ ---"11 'm ...
I I I
_~_~~~E~TH $T
G-Jom
Ncm
. ;0 -"
ImOJ
'1
)>()..,o
o /',- 0
fTlG)Z
-1CO
0-1:;0
-1fTl
'lfTl-1
)>:;ofTl
00
OfTl
C
Z
-j
-<
;0
o
)>
o
"'-..J
N
8
C}
,
f\)
Ul
N"-~"'--
o
o
I
...-<\ I \
0' I I !
~ "'j ...J m, _,.. Ll ....-1.].... m
...,---...~ ::
~ I i
--,V'" -""'L_L_
: '[J ~-i~~
I ;;;-- I
I m I
I ~ 1
-.---.-'_' hn_....n ._.. .... l.., ..ro... ,..., L..
.j:>.
o
o
n__ yn__ _
\
\__J l
\
\
\
\
, ~~<~-\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ -
\-----
--
\- ,-- ,-- --
I
\
I
Y ----
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
~A.NNEl ._~ - - - ~ - ---"j
- - - ~
............__.'n___'.........L....._.. ___nl...'__'....,_,..,.,______'
I l
I
I
Zv
APPENDIX
CITY OF FARMINGTON
COUNTY ROAD 72
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
FILE NO, 141-98-800
Street and Restoration (Sta. 0+00 to 13+65)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA TE
ITEM
UNIT
LS
LS
SY
CY
CY
CY
TN
TN
TN
GL
LF
TN
LF
LS
LS
LF
SF
SY
AC
LF
SF
EA
EA
Mobilization
Traffic Control
Remove bituminous surface
Common excavation
Granular borrow
Select granular
Aggregate base, Class 5, 100 % crushed
Type 31 bituminous base course
Type 41 bituminous wear course
Bituminous material for tack coat
B618 concrete curb and gutter
Type 41 bituminous mixture for pathway
Remove existing culverts
Clear and grub
Landscaping
Pavement marking
F & I sign panels
Sod with 4" topsoil
Seeding with topsoil, mulch, and fertilizer
Silt fence
Concrete sidewalk
Concrete pedestrian ramps
Repair driveways
EST.
QUANTITY
1
1
4,000
8,000
2,000
3,800
3,500
800
400
300
2,800
160
800
1
1
2,700
50
4,500
0.5
1 ,400
7,000
2
16
UNIT
PRICE
$10,000.00
5000.00
2.00
6.00
7.00
8,00
10.00
32.00
35.00
1.00
6.00
50.00
5.00
10000,00
8000.00
0,25
25,00
2,50
1500,00
3,00
3,00
500.00
750,00
Estimated Construction Cost
Total Project cost
ReportEstimate
EST.
COST
$10,000
5,000
8,000
48,000
14,000
30,400
35,000
25,600
14,000
300
16,800
8,000
4,000
10,000
8,000
675
1,250
11,250
750
4,200
21,000
1,000
12,000
$289,225
$404,047
Water Main (Sta. 0+00 to 13+65)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTlMA TE
ITEM
6" DIP, Class 52
6" gate valve and box
1" type K copper service
1" corporation stop
1" curb stop and box
DIP fittings
Megalug
Mechanical trench compaction
Improved pipe foundation per 6" inc,
Cut tee into existing CIP water main
Water main lowering as per detail
Sanitary Sewer (Sta. 0+00 to 13+65)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA TE
UNIT
LF
EA
LF
EA
EA
LB
EA
LF
LF
EA
EA
EST.
QUANTITY
80
1
600
9
9
500
5
680
680
1
1
UNIT
PRICE
$25.00
800.00
15.00
50.00
250.00
1.00
75.00
1.00
1.00
500.00
5,000,00
Estimated Construction Cost
Total Project cost
EST.
COST
$2,000
800
9,000
450
2,250
500
375
680
680
500
5,000
$22,235
$31,062
ITEM
8" PVC, SDR 35, 12'-14' deep in place
8" PVC, SDR 35, 14'-16' deep in place
8" PVC, SDR 35, 16'-18' deep in place
8" PVC, SDR 26,18'-20' deep in place
8" PVC, SDR 26, 20'-22' deep in place
Standard 4' dia, MH w/casting
4' dia. MH overdepth
Connect to existing MH
4" PVC service pipe in place, SDR 26
6" PVC service pipe in place, SDR 26
8" x 4" PVC service wye branch
8" x 6" PVC service wye branch
Improved pipe foundation per 6" inc,
Mechanical trench compaction
Televise sewer
UNIT
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
LF
EA
LF
LF
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
EST.
QUANTITY
170
590
440
45
50
4
26
1
500
40
14
1
2,000
1,830
1,300
UNIT
PRICE
$32.00
34,00
36.00
38.00
40.00
2,000.00
100.00
2,000.00
20,00
25.00
50.00
75.00
1.00
1.00
1,00
EST.
COST
$5,440
20,060
15,840
1,710
2,000
8,000
2,600
2,000
10,000
1,000
700
75
2,000
1,830
1,300
Estimated Construction Cost
Total Project cost
ReportEstimate
$74,555
$104,153
Storm Sewer (Sta. 0+00 to 13+65)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA TE
ITEM
15" RCP, Class 5, in place
18" RCP, Class 5, in place
2' x 3' catch basin
4' diameter catch basin manhole
Connect to existing MH
Mechanical trench compaction
Improved pipe foundation per 6" inc,
COST SUMMARY (STA. 0+00 TO 13+65)
Street and Restoration
Water Main
Sanitary Sewer
Storm Sewer
Total
UNIT
LF
LF
EA
EA
EA
LF
LF
EST.
QUANTITY
520
50
2
2
1
570
570
UNIT
PRICE
$28.00
32.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
1,000.00
1.00
1.00
Estimated Construction Cost
Total Project cost
Construction
$289,225
$22,235
$74,555
$25,300
$411,315
ReportEstimate
Total Project
$404,047
$31,062
$104,153
$35,344
$574,607
EST.
COST
$14,560
1,600
3,000
4,000
1,000
570
570
$25,300
$35,344
APPENDIX
CITY OF FARMINGTON
COUNTY ROAD 72
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
FILE NO. 141-98-800
Street and Restoration (Sta. 13+65 to 33+00)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA TE
ITEM
UNIT
LS
LS
SY
CY
CY
CY
TN
TN
TN
GL
LF
TN
LF
LS
LS
LF
SF
SY
AC
LF
SF
EA
EA
Mobilization
Traffic Control
Remove bituminous surface
Common excavation
Granular borrow
Select granular
Aggregate base, Class 5, 100 % crushed
Type 31 bituminous base course
Type 41 bituminous wear course
Bituminous material for tack coat
B618 concrete curb and gutter
Type 41 bituminous mixture for pathway
Remove existing culverts
Clear and grub
Landscaping
Pavement marking
F & I sign panels
Sod with 4" topsoil
Seeding with topsoil, mulch, and fertilizer
Silt fence
Concrete sidewalk
Concrete pedestrian ramps
Repair driveways
EST.
QUANTITY
1
1
650
12,000
3,000
5,600
5,000
1,200
600
400
3,900
230
200
1
1
4,000
30
7,000
2
2,000
7,000
8
2
UNIT
PRICE
$10,000.00
5,000,00
2.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
10.00
32,00
35,00
1.00
6.00
50.00
5.00
5,000,00
5,000.00
0.25
25,00
2.50
1,500,00
3.00
3,00
500,00
750.00
Estimated Construction Cost
Total Project cost
ReportEstimate
EST.
COST
$10,000
5,000
1,300
72,000
21,000
44,800
50,000
38,400
21 ,000
400
23,400
11,500
1,000
5,000
5,000
1,000
750
17,500
3,000
6,000
21,000
4,000
1,500
$364,550
$509,276
Water Main (Sta. 13+65 to 33+00)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA TE
ITEM
UNIT
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
EA
EA
LF
EA
EA
LB
EA
LF
LF
EA
EA
6" DIP, Class 52
8" DIP, Class 52
16" DIP water main
6" gate valve and box
8" gate valve and box
16" butterfly valve and box
Hydrant
1" type K copper service
1" corporation stop
1" curb stop and box
DIP fittings
Megalug
Mechanical trench compaction
Improved pipe foundation per 6" inc,
Connect to existing CIP water main
Water main lowering as per detail
EST.
QUANTITY
50
1,600
100
1
5
2
1
60
1
1
3,000
45
1,810
1,810
1
1
UNIT
PRICE
$25.00
30.00
50.00
800.00
1,200.00
2,000.00
2,500,00
15.00
50.00
250.00
1.00
75,00
1.00
1.00
500.00
5,000.00
Estimated Construction Cost
Total Project cost
Sanitary Sewer (Sta. 13+65 to 33+00)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA TE
EST.
COST
$1,250
$48,000
$5,000
800
6,000
4,000
2,500
900
50
250
3,000
3,375
1,810
1,810
500
5,000
$84,245
$117,690
ITEM
8" PVC, SDR 35, 10'-12' deep in place
8" PVC, SDR 35, 12'-14' deep in place
8" PVC, SDR 35, 14'-16' deep in place
8" PVC, SDR 35, 16'-18' deep in place
8" PVC, SDR 26, 16'-18' deep in place
8" PVC, SDR 26,18'-20' deep in place
8" PVC, SDR 26, 20'-22' deep in place
Standard 4' dia. MH w/casting
4' dia, MH overdepth
Connect to existing MH
4" PVC service pipe in place, SDR 26
8" x 4" PVC service wye branch
8" x 8" PVC service wye branch
Improved pipe foundation per 6" inc,
Mechanical trench compaction
Televise sewer
UNIT
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
LF
EA
LF
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
EST.
QUANTITY
210
430
230
100
25
30
80
4
24
1
40
1
1
1,140
1,140
1,100
UNIT
PRICE
$30.00
32.00
34.00
36.00
37.00
38.00
40.00
2,000.00
100.00
2,000.00
20.00
50.00
100.00
1.00
1.00
1,00
Estimated Construction Cost
Total Project cost
ReportEstimate
EST.
COST
$6,300
13,760
7,820
3,600
925
1,140
3,200
8,000
2,400
2,000
800
50
100
1,140
1,140
1,100
$47,175
$65,903
Storm Sewer (Sta. 13+65 to 33+00)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA TE
ITEM
12" RCP, Class 5, in place
15" RCP, Class 5, in place
18" RCP, Class 5, in place
24" RCP, Class 3, in place
27" RCP, Class 3, in place
30" RCP, Class 3, in place
33" RCP, Class 3, in place
33" RCP FES in place
2' x 3' catch basin
4' diameter catch basin manhole
Pond excavation
Riprap
Mechanical trench compaction
Improved pipe foundation per 6" inc,
COST SUMMARY (STA. 13+65 TO 33+00)
Street and Restoration
Water Main
Sanitary Sewer
Storm Sewer
Total
UNIT
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
EA
LS
CY
LF
LF
EST.
QUANTITY
35
500
535
230
220
500
90
1
6
13
1
20
2,100
2,100
UNIT
PRICE
$26.00
28.00
32.00
42.00
54.00
66.00
80,00
2,000.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
10,000.00
50.00
1,00
1.00
Estimated Construction Cost
Total Project cost
Construction
$364,550
$84,245
$47,175
$145,060
$641,030
ReportEstimate
Total Project
$509,276
$117,690
$65,903
$202,649
$895,519
EST.
COST
$910
14,000
17,120
9,660
11,880
33,000
7,200
2,000
9,000
26,000
10,000
1,000
2,100
2,100
$145,060
$202,649
Preliminary
Project Cost Tracking
Project - County Road 72 Improvements
Description of Project - Reconstruction end New Improvements elong County Road 72
Project No.- 98-21
Items Date Name of Company COat
1. Construction Costs $ 1,052.400.00
Total Construction Costs $ 1,052.400,00
2, Contingencies (10 %) $ 105,240,00
(Contingences and Total Construction Costs) Subtotal . $ 1,157,640,00
3, Engineering, Legal, Administration (27%) $ 312,562,80
(Total of Items 1-3) Subtotal . $ 1,470,202,80
4. Soil Borings $
Subtotal . $
5. Survey Work Estimate $
Subtotal = $
6. Wetland Delineation & Mitigation Estimate
Subtotal = $
7, Permits (list)
MPCA $ 250.00
Department of Health $ 500.00
Subtotal = $ 750.00
8. Change Orders $
Subtotal . $
9. Environmental Studies, testing and monitoring. EAW $
Subtotal = $
10. Testing Services Estimate $ 2.000,00
Subtotal = $ 2.000,00
11. Easement/Right of Way Acquisition Estimated Right of Way acquisition
"TO BE NEGOTIATED"
Subtotal = $
12. Demolition/moving
Subtotal = $
13. Outside Consultants Bonding Costs with Capitalized Interest $
Subtotal = $
14. SWCD - plats mainly - development cost NA
Subtotal = $
15. Street & Utility crew costs 20 Hours @ $50 per hour $ 1,000,00
$
$
Subtotal = $ 1,000.00
ITotal Estimated Project Cost =
$ 1,473,952,80 I
IJQ
TO:
Mayor, Counci~mbers, City
Administrator rc-
FROM:
Lee M. Mann, P .E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT:
Hickory Street Drainage Update
DATE:
June 15, 1998
INTRODUCTION
Council has directed staff to research options to relieve the drainage issue on Hickory Street between
7th and 8th Street.
DISCUSSION
At this time staff is waiting for a reply from MnDDT regarding the possibility of discharging storm
water into the median on TH 3. As of the writing of this memo, authorization to discharge storm
water into the median has not been granted. Staff will update the Council with any new information
that may be available, if any at the meeting.
BUDGET IMPACT
None.
RECOMMENDATION
For information only.
Respectfully submitted,
~fr?~
Lee M. Mann, P .E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
I
CitlJ. of FarminfJ.ton 325 Oak Street · Farminijton, MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fax (612) 463.2591