The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12.04.06 Council Packet City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA PRE-CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 4, 2006 6:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA 5. ST AFF COMMENTS a) Farmington Ridge Plan 6. ADJOURN PUBLiC INFORMATION STATEMENT Council workshops are conducted as an informal work session, all discussions shall be considered fact-finding, hypothetical and unofficial critical thinking exercises, which do not reflect an official public position. Council work session outcomes should not be construed by the attending public and/or reporting media as the articulation of a formal City policy position. Only official Council action normally taken at a regularly scheduled Council meeting should be considered as a formal expression of the City's position on any given matter. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, Council M~mb. City Administrato . / (....-- Lee Smick, AICP City Planner TO: SUBJECT: Sketch Plan - Farmington Ridge DATE: December 4, 2006 ACTION REQUESTED City staff has learned that the City Council would like to be more involved with developments at the sketch plan stage of the development process. Therefore, staff would like the City Council to provide comments to the developer regarding the Farmington Ridge sketch plan, as described below. INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION The Riegel Group Inc., 10503 West 165th Street - Lakeville, MN, is proposing a 13-lot single- family subdivision named Farmington Ridge on 6.3 acres north of Bible Baptist Church at the southeast intersection of Akin Road and 195th Street (Exhibit A & B). The applicant is proposing to construct the development within the oak and basswood grove south of 195th Street. Lots The existing house is proposed to be removed. The lot sizes and widths as shown on Exhibit C are as follows: Lot Lot Size Lot Width 1 20,330 sf 132ft 2 16,380 sf 75 ft 3 12,324 sf 114ft 4 14,494 sf 77 ft 5 15,270 sf 77 ft 6 16,339 sf 77 ft 7 15,836 sf 77 ft 8 12,124 sf 103 ft 9 13,173 sf 109 ft 10 12,788 sf 90 [t 11 12 13 13,294 sf 14,366 sf 16,969 sf 90 ft 85 ft 100ft Transportation Access to the lots will be from a 1,150-foot long cul-de-sac. The cul-de-sac length will require a variance approved by the Planning Commission. The cul-de-sac will be considered a private road and will be constructed at 28- feet in width face to face. Retaining walls and curve speed advisory signs will be located along the private street for safety. The access intersecting Akin Road is almost 600 feet (almost 1/8 mile) from the intersection of Akin Road and 195th Street. Shelly Johnson, the City's Transportation Engineer has stated that this situation is not ideal, but with only 13 dwelling units proposed for the access, the location will work. A southbound bypass lane is proposed on Akin Road to enable thru traffic to avoid turning vehicles. Mr. Johnson has stated that most of the bypass lanes located on Akin Road are utilized for public streets and therefore, a bypass lane may not be necessary for 13 dwelling units, however it would be sufficient if the developer is inclined to install it. Tree Loss Approximately 22 existing oak and basswood trees will be removed to allow for the construction of the subdivision. Oaks ranging from 18 inches to 48 inches in diameter will be removed. Approximately 52 trees will be retained. Utilities Water and storm sewer lines are located along the 195th Street right-of-way. The challenge for the site is the need to service the lots with a sanitary sewer line. The closest sewer line is approximately 920 feet away, located in the intersection of 195th Street and Embers Avenue within the Parkview Ponds subdivision. Another location for hookup would be the 198th Street outlot in the Parkview Ponds subdivision that is approximately 1,367 feet away. Sidewalk. Park. and Trail Requirements A 5-foot wide sidewalk is proposed on the house side on the private street accessing the subdivision. Upon discussions with Randy Distad, the Parks & Recreation Director, he has stated that he is proposing to take cash in lieu for the project and he has requested that a trail connection be installed from the sidewalk in the subdivision to the City nature park to the east. Further discussions with the applicant will occur before the platting stage of the development process. Planning Commission Review Comments - November 14. 2006 The Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan at its November 14, 2006 meeting. At the meeting, the Commissioners expressed concerns with regard to the access onto Akin Road and the possibility of safety issues as the access is on a curve. There was also discussion regarding the preservation of as many of the existing trees on site as well as the possibility of custom grading. There was also some concern expressed as to the slope of the property from 19Sth Street to the lots to be located along the proposed cuI-dc-sac. Respectfully submitted, W~ Lee Smick, AICP City Planner cc: Riegel Group, Inc. 2;i (/ fi 1 (,:\1-.; 0- \ -\ [9 ~~~ ~ G f ~S~ ~ '(C ~~ ~\lP .::::. ~- ~ f- -, \' (I ~0 ~\G\G\\'.i lQ~1 ~~\t:l\\'J)l R~\O~v,~ ~ c:s \..JL \ 0\ 0 \ ~ '\ ;-\ (~ ~ ~~ Akin) ~Oll Eleme,",>, d ~ 'lj Farmington Ridge Project Location tl" A a CJlqlfJblrllr-,Ic;:-\I~~;~/.~'(o. "'>. v~~rJ;I/ -[1. ;!\r ulul~I~\'\-~V o~> ~~ "fA o G ~ I I-I ~\ \ ~ ~ .:f ~ ~ IV ~ o~ I I. (/Iflfl'~0 ~ ~ ru ~\[?\DU\h." ''''NJI oL--.--\ ~ _ ---.: f \ _, ~\,~~ \6i0J 1f1-!t:5 ~\U\~~ ~1!fN\j~ 'v~~ ~^ -DO q q~ brJ- 7 ~ ~ X ;\ CJ~~~<~ ~ ~ -=~ .&-1 ,Clk~\0 _ ~...r--,/--<.. L ---'Fi 0 -'';= ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ fJ --'=4 *- ~& ~ B- ~--'~Q ~~ ~~!~ :r:: t tE E ~2 ~;\5Y[.St l ~I",bct ~= ~ ~. .\\-7 A~~) \~ :r- / J :) ~~Ck Y ~f" A~~~~n \ C!;) ~ G '-' 195th 5t f1 ~@'OOi \\ ..,. ....... '.c,\'> -----I :::--- - --1 Bible ~~. 0 Baptist ~ 11 Church Ig Ig- €fh-/ ~ ~ ---J City Park LwO) e t ~~4 ~ CJ 1I1l" ~l "U "Q ~ > \L:1 0 ::J ~'l [0 O~ ~ ~ ~ a. 0' [ 111~ ~ ~~) ~. ~~ Il ('] J 0 "" ~~~~r ':) "q) ~16 % ~~u~ ~ ~ ~ ~-O_-M 0 ~~~' "~7\\ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~, 1~~\~lG\ ~~ ~'w'...~'AL ~ =- ~ 0 0 ~ -VI i/["lIl-.' 'M "--L ., ~'S: I ........, \~~( ~ 0 ~~ 0 I ~ ~ 11.-, ~\()\ ~ /\ \ J,/ i\\\ \ ~ N A "".." "0. "Iwi".'\ SNOISI^3C:1 I'~" '" '".""." .00" ",., UJ~"G'l'I....n~-~I"''''''& ~~~:g~ l~~~l ,~::td Hll'."''''lOUU\1I olll"''1QQ1H lill ''''P) "'"H NI'l'lfln,nll "'Il.I.JI~.nlgOlIGI~-ON-:ln ~31""O ~ 5,,,c~~J"e'~"'''Jpu,<, 'X'l"N. ",.,"OYln '0 .'.IS "wi /. ,~., ~ ....,......."...,..,..''''...'''., wD i ,..., ..... ~......~". "..... ~w '.Oon ,0 OW /0 p........... CDa ".,~ 'ottl l'~\ jl!l"'~ I...IOU I ?vD~; OlO!;~UU!r1 'ii1U!^illt01 u;Zl lilllJ1S 41;91 158M raCiOL NVld 311S ).1:l'VNII^l113C1d V'lOS3NNI~ 'NOl.::>Nlrt!:i'V.:j '8NI dnOCJ8l3831CJ 380101 N018NII'i<J\I J --'I w " ~ w " 0 is ~-5 Z is Z "Z ~ " 0 :r::::; ~ ~~ ~~ OZ ~...- ~::i i! ~~ ':,? \l 0' ~~ u <" , , w< is " t:l~ ~~ 0 ~" u:e , 0 u o~ w< U ~ "w s: ~ ~~~ "0 ..~ 0 "Z O. ~ 0 a~ 00 N~~ Z J g8 < Z ~~ .. ~~ Q ZO -, ~~ , Z I- s~ <w ~~ '!: "" 9:: "~ ~ ~w i; 5:' UO ct:: OZ .. ct:: ~: w' ~~ '..... <( o~ I- U ~~ ~~ <( ~ l: [fJ [fJ .0 ,< I- o~ ::J w OU ~" <( I zi! 0 ~< ~~ 0 f! u ~~ w .- W <0 ~N Z z_ W "~ W 'w t:: < "0 t:: w n ct:: -0 ~~ CO e, N , I- [fJ .=~ [fJ 0 !! ~ 0../ j' ... i= <( u; 0' ....J "... g~~ ~:: o ~ ~ ..1 .')[ J ~ l ~\ ~ \ i ~1L-_l (C~J- ~- - '1 \ \ \ \ ---- -. " ~ o -------- ~ 'i 00) o 08 '0 00 o ' o ~ ~ ,-;1-1 :f ~. ~ ~\ iJ"l ~ ~ ! ;\ J:I ':l' I. ~~ ""I'"'-~\J. M N ~- !I~ z o i= () w '0 en ~ --' <t () 0: ~i . \ eyE I",,,"..,.".,..",. wOO'o'.l.nn~~~I""""" ~1~~:~~ l~~l '~~:~d 1011\ '.~~ol.\IUIII ~: :~~~::~ '"'0 '1~'lJ.~"'B 011~ I ~'DN -:>11 9"570V0f31l'O IO~ "'''llu''J:>8'~'''9'PlJ" ~ =:11 ~~~:.~':i~~ifJ~;l:~;~J~lo~:~~ '8NI dnOCJ8l3831CJ 5NoI5,^3.1 ttrO~<; D1053UU!1't '811!"altOl ;:::zU 1&&)15 411;91 IS8M rOt;OL NV'ld 311S 'VlOS3NNII't 'NOLONlr;~'V.:I 3:)OI~ N01:)Nlr;~\f j ~ /....-r;'Sllllil: Ol'T>lr SW1/' or SEC?'.1W?11..RCE.20 .2.' ....... 'I \ \ \ \ QQ)... ~ () C> N !i ~ [1'''Il\1o;'1 " 2 U f ~ f 0 " " 0 z u , . z . < ~ i:l ~ [ u ~ S 2 1; 2 ~ ~ 10......""'<;.0 < ~ 0 1; rj 1; ~r ~" r r 2 <W 2- ]~ ~~ 2- ~~ ~< IO W -< ~~ 03' ,,~ ~~ ~ 2~ " l; ~ g,12 "~ , IW 0 Z~ > 2" < ~< _I 0 N 1 ~ it " Z Z o N ~ ffi 0: 0: ::> U [LW <(...J :;:;<( zU Or!) -0 f--f-- ('it; g~ ~ ~ r,:~~"'r:~:\ En1"......p... ~~~ ---(i~--' ~~. ----- I JJ ~.~. I ;!~J ;I~ ~ . d . z o r= U W! . C1J" ~ ~! U ii: >- f-- . o \ t ~ <{ I- <{ o w != Ul ~ S ~'.C City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) 7 CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (11/20/06 Regular) (11/27/06 Special) b) Adopt Resolution - Approve HPC Consultant Contract - Administration c) Accept Resignation Parks and Recreation Commission - Administration d) Approve Easement Acquisition Contract - Flagstaff Avenue Project- Engineering e) City Administrator Evaluation Summary - City Attorney f) Approve Bills 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Truth-in- Taxation Hearing - Finance b) Adopt Resolution - Heritage Landmark Designations - 500 Spruce Street and 520 Oak Street - Administration c) Elm Street Reconstruction Project - Engineering 9. AWARDOFCONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Frontier WiFi Presentation b) Approve Equipment Shared-Use Agreement - Parks and Recreation J 1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Cataract Relief Association Pension Request - Fire Department b) Approve Change Order No. 1 Spruce Street - Engineering c) Mill and Overlay Project Update - Engineering Action Taken Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN City of Fannington 325 Oak Street Fannington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Action Taken 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open/or Audience Comments) "", CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (11/20/06 Regular) (11/27/06 Special) b) Adopt Resolution - Approve HPC Consultant Contract - Administration c) Accept Resignation Parks and Recreation Commission - Administration d) Approve Easement Acquisition Contract - Flagstaff Avenue Project- Engineering e) City Administrator Evaluation Summary - City Attorney f) Approve Bills g) Cataract Relief Association Pension Request - Fire Department h) Approve Change Order No. 1 Spruce Street - Engineering i) Mill and Overlay Project Update - Engineering Approved Pulled Accepted Approved Information Received Approved Approved Approved Approved 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Truth-in- Taxation Hearing - Finance b) Adopt Resolution - Heritage Landmark Designations - 500 Spruce Street and 520 Oak Street - Administration c) Elm Street Reconstruction Project - Engineering Information Received R131-06 R132-06 9. AWARDOFCONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Frontier WiFi Presentation b) Approve Equipment Shared-Use Agreement - Parks and Recreation Information Received Approved 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN 7a.- COUNCIL MINUTES PRE-MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 6:30 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Brian Lindquist, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant 2. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA Councilmember Pritzlaff asked about the list of bills and why there is a variation in pay for election judges. Administrative Services Director Shadick explained that some judges worked the primary or general or both, some worked full or half days, and some required more hours of training. Councilmember Pritzlaffthen asked about the payment for Aslakson's Blacktopping for the mill and overlay project. He stated the project was not completed properly and wanted to make sure money was held back until the work was completed. Councilmember Pritzlaff noted there were ridges in the asphalt and the proper equipment was not used. City Administrator Herlofsky explained the work done in November has not been billed. Councilmember Pritzlaffthen asked about the comprehensive plan amendment for parks and why so much more land was needed for parks at the Fountain Valley Golf Course property and possibly have the clubhouse also. Parks and Recreation Director Distad explained the City identifies park location and acreage after annexation. In this situation it might be approximately 20 acres. The densities will drive the number of acres required for park dedication. Three acres were to be carried over from Executive Estates to this development. Councilmember Pritzlaffnoted at the Planning Commission meeting, it was mentioned to also obtain the clubhouse. Staff explained that is something the Parks and Recreation Commission has looked at if the developer was looking at demolishing it, perhaps it could be used as a recreational facility or warming house. Council Minutes (Pre-Meeting) November 20, 2006 Page 2 Councilmember Wilson noted on the monthly financial report there are two enterprise accounts, liquor operations and solid waste, where expenses are moving faster than revenues. There seems to be a larger variance than what was budgeted. Councilmember Wilson supported the Fire Departments pension request, but preferred to have a 2-4 year plan. He suggested a workshop to discuss this and bring it back to the December 4, 2006 meeting. Councilmember McKnight asked about the comprehensive plan amendment for parks and if the proposed trails along the western edge align with the trails in Executive Estates and the industrial area. Staff noted there are no trails along the eastern edge of the industrial park. The trails shown are conceptual in nature. They would like three trails going north and south and three trails going east and west through the development. The location will be determined in the concept plan. 225th Street has a trail part way down, but some of the properties are still in the township so there will be a gap. Councilmember McKnight noted he did not want a circle of trails in the development he wants them connecting. Councilmember McKnight noted on the Fountain Valley item, he spoke with Mr. Colin Garvey, and stated Castle Rock has not had time to comment on this. Two days is not a reasonable amount of time. He suggested approving the MUSA recommendation and table the comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning until after the Castle Rock Town Board has had time to meet. Mayor Soderberg suggested tabling everything until after Castle Rock has reviewed this. The Orderly Annexation Agreement calls for reasonable time to review and comment on a change in the comprehensive plan before Planning Commission or Council approval. Castle Rock received this item two days before their meeting. Two days is not reasonable time. Councilmember McKnight noted the agreement talks about comprehensive plan amendments, not MUSA. He would like to consider the MUSA recommendation. Councilmember Fogarty agreed. Councilmember Wilson noted the developer and the Castle Rock Town Board is here. This is a great example of an item that should not even be on the agenda. We are wasting people's time. Only items that are ready to be voted on should be on the Council agenda. 5. STAFF COMMENTS City Administrator Herlofsky reminded everyone that the Council and EDA will meet November 27. He provided an updated checklist for the mill and overlay project. 6. ADJOURN MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to adjourn at 6:51 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ,h---}c-~ q::ynthia Muller Executive Assistant COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR November 20, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Soderberg led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Audience: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Brian Lindquist, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Denise & Dan May, Randy Oswald, Arlyn Lamb, Mark VanDorn, Bill Sauber, Jay Clinkscales, Joel West, Kari Gill, Dan Meyer, Lori Zierden, Chris Engler 4. APPROVE AGENDA Councilmember McKnight moved item 10e) King Property Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning to the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Pritzlaff pulled item 71) Approve Bills for discussion and separate vote. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Pritzlaffto approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS a) Swearing-In Police Officer - Administration Andrew VanDorn was sworn-in as a new Police Officer. 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS 7. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by McKnight, second by Fogarty to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approved Council Minutes (11/6/06 Regular) (11/8/06 Special) b) Adopted RESOLUTION R124-06 approving application submittal for landfill abatement funds from Dakota County - Public Works c) Approved Donation - Fire Department d) Approved Various Licenses and Permits - Administration e) Set January 6, 2007 Special Council Meeting - Board and Commission Interviews - Administration Council Minutes (Regular) November 20,2006 Page 2 f) Received information capital outlay cable commission - Administration g) Received information October 2006 financial report - Finance h) Approved permitting agreement - Elm Street Project - Engineering i) Adopted RESOLUTION R125-06 approving comprehensive plan amendment concerning existing and proposed parks, trails, and open space plan map - Parks and Recreation j) Acknowledged resignation Community Development - Human Resources k) Received information resident recognition - Police Department The Police Department received a letter thanking the police officers for their assistance in saving a life. m) Adopted RESOLUTIONS R126-06 and R127-06 and ORDINANCE 006-565 approving the King property comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning - Community Development APIF, MOTION CARRIED. I) Approve Bills Councilmember Pritzlaffhad a concern with the bill for Aslakson's Blacktopping for the mill and overlay project. Some areas are patched in the final lift and there are ridges in the asphalt as a commercial size paver was not used. He did not feel the work was acceptable and was not willing to pay the $240,000 without knowing there was money left to repair the work. Also, the manholes need to be raised and the asphalt is higher than the concrete along the curbs. Councilmember McKnight supported delaying approval of this bill until staff can research the work this bill covers. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second McKnight to approve the bills except for Aslak.son Blacktopping. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Approve 2007 License Renewals - Administration Applications for On-Sale Liquor and Sunday licenses, Club licenses, On-Sale Intoxicating Malt Liquor and On-Sale Wine licenses, and Sauna and Therapeutic Massages licenses for various businesses were received for renewal for 2007. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve the above licenses for 2007. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Fairhill Development Update - Administration City Administrator Herlofsky prepared a response to a letter from Newland Communities regarding 19Sth Street right-of-way, park dedication, fire station/water tower, and Diamond Path in the Fairhill development. Mr. Peter Coyle, attorney for Newland Communities, stated Newland's request is that the Council establish a working group to work with Newland on addressing Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 3 some of the impacts that are associated with the Fairhill development. There are financial consequences to the above items that Newland wants to be clear about. 195th Street is proposed as a 4-lane right-of-way. Newland understands it is their obligation to dedicate two lanes of right-of-way to the City with the plat, but there is a difference of opinion with the City and the County as to whether they are obligated to dedicate four lanes with the plat or whether Newland should be compensated for the additional two lanes since it will be constructed in a future phase. Newland is prepared to dedicate the right-of-way, but they want to understand how the issue will be addressed over the life of the contract. Regarding the park in the southwest area, when the comp plan was approved in June, Newland had intentions of working with the school district on a school site in the southwest comer. In the alternative, it was identifying land it would use for residential development. Newland also showed a public park of30 acres. Staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission would like the park in the southwest comer to be a 55-acre park. Newland understood that was an interest of the City, but it was not a part of the comp plan approval. Mr. Coyle noted this was a surprise to Newland that they would be required to dedicate the entire 55 acres as part of the plat. They are not opposed to the City having control of a 55-acre park, but they would like to be compensated for a portion of it. Newland has proposed in excess of the policy for park dedication. It is a manner of how the land transfer will occur over ten years. The City does not have money budgeted for the development of a major park development like what is being planned by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Mr. Coyle asked the Council to appoint a committee comprised of two Councilmembers, members of the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff. The goal would be to get these issues addressed. He asked Council to not take action to approve the letter proposed by staff. Mayor Soderberg stated this letter does not close offthe ability to negotiate. Councilmember Wilson noted the 55 acres is clearly identified in the parks master plan so he was confused that Newland thought this was new information. He was curious as to why a sub-committee would be more effective than working with the entire Council. Mr. Coyle replied the City approved the comp plan for Fairhill in June. He noted the minutes contain no discussion as part of the comp plan amendment that the City would be seeking a 55-acre park in the southwest comer. Their plan showed half of the comer would be either residential or a school site. The school site has not materialized, so they plan to go forward with residential development. Regarding the committee concept, some of the issues are very expensive questions. Newland wanted better confidence as to how the issues would be resolved. They felt a committee would be more productive. Councilmember Wilson stated he would support one or more workshops with Newland. Councilmember Pritzlaffwas not comfortable with having a committee and would support a Council workshop with Newland. Councilmember Fogarty stated she was frustrated with the inconsistency in items in the Council packet. She was very open to having a Council workshop with Newland to discuss the items. Councilmember McKnight noted the City's relationship with Newland has Council Minutes (Regular) November 20,2006 Page 4 been very positive. He did not think it was appropriate for Mr. Coyle to be in attendance questioning a letter the City Administrator will be sending if the Council says yes, before it is sent. Mayor Soderberg stated the attorney has advised this letter does not close the door on discussions. The letter has been prepared based on Council discussions and Parks and Recreation Commission discussions. City Administrator Herlofsky stated the purpose was to get Council's reaction, and suggested staff do more research on the items and have more consistency. Council reached a consensus to table this item for a future meeting. b) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Twin Ponds Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Plat and Wetland Conservation Act Permit - Community Development The CDA has submitted an application for a comp plan amendment, rezoning and wetland conservation act permit for the Twin Ponds development. There is a roadway extension in the southern portion of the project to tie into Executive Estates. The comp plan shows medium density residential. On the southern piece the CDA would like to plat six single family lots and 223rd Street would separate this from the medium density. The proposed zoning is R-l. The CDA proposes 10 buildings with a total of 50 units. They will be rental townhomes owned by the CDA. The streets will be private roadways and a tot lot will be included. There are a total of 132 parking spaces. There is a 33 ft. wide access to TH3, however it is not enough for a 60 ft. wide right-of-way. The CDA is proposing to give up right-of-way as a backage road and start negotiations with BP or Happy Harry's to obtain additional right-of-way. The backage road would be a regional concept, so this would be reviewed when commercial is developed. With the backage road there could be a full intersection at TH3 and 225th Street, and a center intersection at Centennial Drive. Staff proposed the CDA grant the City a right-of-way for the northerly access. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated if the CDA is not able to obtain 60 ft. for the right-of-way, there will not be access to TH3. He felt this should be worked out first. Staff explained future commercial development may assist in obtaining this access. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked how the development will be accessed from the north. Staff explained the traffic engineer felt the development could have access from the south and does not need access to the north. Looking at it regionally, the outlets would be removed and replaced with the backage road in the future. Councilmember Pritzlaff did not feel it was in the City's best interest to have all the access to the south. Staff explained they will have access to the east and then south and to the west and then south. Councilmember McKnight asked about the timeline for the six single-family lots. Staff noted the eastern portion of the townhomes will be built first before the single-family homes in Executive Estates. Councilmember McKnight liked the backage road, but the northerly access is important to him. He does not like doing things that are not complete now. The bigger issue is fairness. They are making Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 5 one developer build an access to a road and build and pay for the road and another developer is able to add on without any costs. Councilmember Wilson agreed with the previous comments. This is an attractive development, but it is not ready for Council yet as far as the transportation. Councilmember Fogarty had concerns about the private park being counted as parkland dedication, the northerly access is very critical, she liked the backage road and the concept of the development, but we are picking out a portion of roadway that at some point the City will have to find a way to pay for. Weare setting ourselves up to bond citywide for something that will benefit a small number of people. Mayor Soderberg was concerned with the park dedication and how we deal with private parks. Even though this is a small park, it is a matter of being consistent and fair with everyone. Regarding transportation and the backage road, he would like to make sure we can assess for the road once there is commercial development. He would like to see a plan laid out for this. Parks and Recreation Director Distad explained the park dedication ordinance states the dedication may be given. With this being a public agency, it was decided to give them credit for 1.5 acres. The tot lot is .25 acres. They will have to pay cash in lieu for 1.25 acres they are not dedicating. Other developments containing private parks have been private developments. Mayor Soderberg asked if the fact that this is a public agency makes any difference as far as park dedication. Councilmember McKnight stated with the ordinance saying "may" where do we stop? Staff agreed the ordinance needs to be more specific with situations when this would be done. The City did give the school district credit for park dedication for their ball fields. Councilmember Fogarty stated she agrees a public agency should be granted credit, but it needs to be a written policy. The only concern is what ifthere is a developer for affordable housing, do we give them the same leeway. Staff suggested bringing this back to the Parks and Recreation Commission to amend the ordinance. Councilmember Pritzlaff would rather have cash-in-lieu than a private park. He agreed with public agencies being granted credit for park dedication as far as schools, however the CDA is a different type of public agency and he would not support the credit. Councilmember Wilson would prefer to stick to the ordinance and if there is deviation there should be rationale for it. Ms. Kari Gill, CDA, stated they typically do pay park dedication fees. The tot lot is primarily intended for the residents, so they would not be opposed to paying the park dedication fee in the full amount. Regarding transportation, Councilmember Pritzlaff was concerned that this project was discussed at one point with Executive Estates or before it was at the current stage. He was suspect with this coming to Council after 225th Street was done. The Council asked the developer of Executive Estates to provide Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 6 transportation routes into the development. Is it Council's role to put stipulations on Executive Estates and those things that have made this property accessible and should Mr. Garvey be compensated for that? He does not think it was fair to hand over a gift of transportation routes. There has to be funds that go back to the developer of Executive Estates. Mayor Soderberg then asked if Riverbend would be required to pay Dakota Estates and Prairie Creek for the roads they built to access Riverbend. As a policy that would entitle previous developments compensation for roadways for subsequent developments. There are businesses to the north and the south that may benefit from a backage road and they should participate in the payment of that road. Mr. Colin Garvey, developer of Executive Estates, stated the difference with Riverbend is that you have to go through other developments to get there. This development had its own frontage road. He showed an original drawing from 2004 for Executive Estates. Staff required three entrances for a safety issue. When he was working on his plans, he was told 33 ft. was not wide enough because 66 ft. was required by the traffic engineer. Last Tuesday he was informed there was no entrance on the frontage road. When it comes to transportation, there should be consistency. A park for this project was discussed because Executive Estates added a trail to the park. The frontage road is owned by Tollefson and the CDA owns the property to the east. The concern with the frontage road is that at any point the owners may not allow access to the frontage road. The frontage road would provide an access to TH3. Mr. Joel West, Project Manager of Tollefson Development, stated they agree with the access to the north and they are open to providing the easement needed to TH3. This would be a temporary access. City Attorney Jamnik recommended taking it as a permanent easement or right-of-way and vacate the areas not needed in the future. Councilmember McKnight stated he would vote for this if we have the northerly access at Centennial Drive. We have a letter from MnDOT saying Centennial Drive is the preferred location for the intersection. Councilmember Pritzlaffwould not support the project without the northerly access to TH3. Councilmember Wilson would also like to have a solid transportation plan identified beforehand. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Pritzlaffto table this to January 16,2007 and inform the developer of the extension. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Fountain Valley Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and MUSA Recommendation - Community Development Mayor Soderberg recommended tabling this item to allow Castle Rock time to consider this item. Two days is not reasonable time. Councilmember Pritzlaff was not sure why staff did not get it to Castle Rock sooner to allow them enough Council Minutes (Regular) November 20,2006 Page 7 time for review. This project has been worked on and delayed and Castle Rock knew it was coming. He does not understand why this should be delayed since it has already gone to the Planning Commission. Mayor Soderberg noted the Planning Commission took action on an application that was not signed by the owner of record. It should not have been brought to the Planning Commission. Councilmember Wilson noted items 10b and 10c were not ready to be on the agenda. It gave the developer the sense Council was prepared to act on this tonight. Councilmember McKnight recognized the requirements ofthe Orderly Annexation Agreement where the City has to give the Town Board time to review the comprehensive plan amendment. He felt they did have enough information to act on the MUSA recommendation. Mr. Russ Zellmer, Castle Rock Town Board Chair, requested time to review the development and have the full board comment in writing. Councilmember Fogarty agreed that the Town Board should have time to comment. By putting this on the agenda we gave the developer the impression we would be doing something with this tonight. Approving the MUSA is fair. Mr. Colin Garvey, of Castle Rock Development, stated he believed this would be acted on tonight. Not all signatures are received until the final plat. He has gone as far as preliminary plat before the township has signed off on property. He asked for a favorable recommendation. He has waited long enough. He will continue to work with the township and the City on parks, screening, etc. Mayor Soderberg noted moving forward without having the signature from the owner of record is not a judicious thing to do. We have a process to follow. This development will be good for the whole City, but to do this at the expense of the process is wrong. To move forward with MUSA tonight is token. It goes no where until there is a comp plan amendment. Councilmember McKnight appreciated wanting to follow the process, but the MUSA is not included in the Orderly Annexation Agreement. By acting on MUSA it does not violate the contract. MOTION by McKnight, second by Fogarty approving the Fountain Valley property to Farmington's Metropolitan Urban Service Area. The remaining requests will be tabled until the December 18, 2006 Council Meeting. Councilmember Wilson proposed splitting the questions for separate vote on the items. Councilmember McKnight asked what happens if Council votes down a comp plan amendment. Attorney J amnik stated the application would be dead and would have to be re-filed and go through the Planning Commission. Tabling is preferred if it is a viable application. Voting for the vote split: Pritzlaff, Wilson. Voting against the vote split: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight. Request fails. Voting for the motion to adopt RESOLUTION R128-06 approving MUSA and table the other requests until December 18, 2006: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff. Voting against: Wilson. MOTION CARRIED. Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 8 d) Adopt Resolution - Riverbend 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat - Community Development Homes by Chase is proposing to re-plat the northern 75 acres of the Riverbend subdivision. They would like to add 13 lots to the area. The original plat called for 140 lots in the entire development. Riverbend 2nd Addition will contain 78 single-family lots. The developer is proposing two outlots for an area where a number of residents in Dakota County Estates claim they have a right to. It will be determined later whether the property will be divided by an easement or a deed. Outlot C is being held as a potential roadway connection to the north. Parks and Recreation have approved the location of the park and trails. Approval of the preliminary plat is contingent on the following: 1. Approval of the construction plans for grading, storm water and utilities by the Engineering Division. 2. Submittal of a SWPPP and dewatering plan to the SWCD. MOTION by Wilson, second by McKnight to adopt RESOLUTION R129-06 approving the Riverbend Preliminary Plat with the above contingencies. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. f) Approve Change Order No.1 Spruce Street - Engineering The change order is for a total of $40,000. MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritz1affto table this item until the December 4,2006 Council Meeting. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. g) Adopt Resolution - Dakota County CDA Redevelopment Incentive Grant Program - Community Development Staff requested authorization to submit an application to the CDA for grant funds. The CDA has created a new grant program due to changes in the CDBG program. The funds would be used to assist with the demolition of the Riste building and the costs of hazardous materials abatement. The City can apply to the CDA to have the money allocated away from this project. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Wilson to adopt RESOLUTION R130-06 authorizing staff to submit an application for a grant in an amount not to exceed $66,804.90. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Cataract Relief Association Pension Request - Administration The Cataract Relief Association has requested a pension increase for 2007 from $3,350 to $3,750. The City's contribution of$65,000 is already in the 2007 budget. Mr. Bill Sauber, member of the Cataract Relief Association, stated the association would like Council to consider the increase to $3,750 per year of service. Councilmember Wilson supported the $3,750, however, he would like to see a 4- year plan for long range planning. Mr. Sauber noted he did not have enough time Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 9 to come up with a long-range plan. Councilmember Wilson proposed accepting the $400 increase so for 2007 it would be $3,750 and have it increase $150 per year each year through 2010. This would bring the association in line with other cities. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked how many people are eligible for retirement this year and how many years do they have. Mr. Sauber replied there are 7-9 people that have 20 years of service or more that could retire. Five are over 50 years old and could collect their money immediately. How it affects the fund depends on how many retire and when. If the association makes 5% on their money next year they will be at 96% funded at the end of 2007. Councilmember Wilson wanted to see the impact of retirements and the projection. A discussion followed on various amounts for increases over the next few years. Councilmember Wilson proposed setting a workshop to discuss a plan. It was determined to hold a workshop on November 27,2006 at 4:30 p.m. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to table this item to the December 4, 2006 Council Meeting. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Councilmember Fogarty: Noted in the bills there were 56 election judges paid and thanked them for their service. She complimented Councilmembers McKnight and Wilson for helping with the Rambling River Days fundraiser. Councilmember McKnight: Strategic planning worksheets should be returned to City Administrator Herlofsky by Wednesday. He requested dates be set for the 2007 retreat and regular workshops. Councilmember Wilson: Asked staff to contact developers for their thoughts on plans for 2007. He thanked Officer Sundvall for leading the boy scout troop on a tour of the police station. Councilmember Pritzlaff: Attended the special School Board meeting last Friday regarding the new land swap agreement between the Christensen's and the school district. One concern he had is the agreement mentions 1 + acres that the Christensen's will have an easement on. He wondered if this would leave a conforming lot. It will but he questions how it can be a conforming lot if the owner of the property is the one that has the easement. The property owner should own it and the other party should have the easement. The land swap details 18 acres along Flagstaff that he feels could be valued higher if it was zoned commercial. City Administrator Herlofsky: Planning prepared a map showing there are 877 vacant lots in the City that have services and are waiting for a house to be built. Council Minutes (Regular) November 20,2006 Page 10 Mayor Soderberg: Attended Veteran's Day programs this week. The Middle School West does a great program honoring veterans. Council recessed at 9:46 p.m. for Executive Session. 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION a) City Administrator Evaluation 15. ADJOURN Respectfully submitted, ~rvr~~ (// Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES November 27, 2006 Mayor Soderberg called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. Present: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson Tim Pietsch, Bill Sauber, Jay Clinkscales, Tom Hemish, Bob Ellingsworth, Dan Meyer Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve the agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the pension benefit for the Cataract Relief Association. Mr. Bill Sauber presented a plan from the Cataract Relief Association to bring them up to Stanton Group 6 for their pension benefit level by 2010. This would include a $400 increase in 2007 and 2008 and a $425 increase in 2009 and 2010, which would bring them to $5,000 by 2010. The City proposed a $150 increase in 2007,2008, and 2009 and a $200 increase in 2010, bringing the pension benefit to $4,000 in 2010. The City's proposal also showed a 5% increase each year from 2011 through 2022. After much discussion Councilmembers proposed the following: Councilmember Pritzlaff - $400 increase in 2007 and divide $1250 over 5 years for a six-year plan. Councilmember McKnight - $300 increase each year for 5 12 years. Councilmember Wilson - $400 increase in 2007 and $300 the following years. Councilmember Fogarty - $300 increase each year for 5 12 years. Mayor Soderberg - $300 increase each year for 5 12 years. MOTION by McKnight, second by Fogarty to adjourn at 5:27 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, ~,-Zkfr7~ ~thia Muller Executive Assistant City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7b TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrat~ Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director FROM: SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - Historic Preservation Consultant Services DATE: December 4, 2006 ACTION REQUIRED Adopt the resolution approving the contract for Historic Preservation Consultant Services. DISCUSSION Attached is a proposed contract for historic preservation consultant services with Robert Vogel and Pathfinder CRM, LLC. The contract is for the period of January 1,2007 through December 31,2007 and establishes an annual retainer fee and an hourly wage for historic preservation services provided. This contract is required to establish an hourly wage, for in-kind services Mr. Vogel may provide in conjunction with Certified Local Government Grants. The grants are used to further the exploration of historic sites in Farmington BUDGET IMPACT The consultant fees are included in the proposed 2007 budget. R%:d~ ~4C/;/~ Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director RESOLUTION NO. R -06 APPROVING THE CONTRACT FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANT SERVICES Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 4th day of December, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has in the past applied for a CLG (Certified Local Government) Grant; and, WHEREAS, this contract is required to establish an hourly wage which will be used for in-kind services provided by Mr. Vogel in conjunction with the grant; and, WHEREAS, Mr. Vogel will be paid $4,000 in a lump sum at the beginning ofthe year 2007; and, WHEREAS, the grant will be used to designate historic sites throughout the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby approves the Contract for Historic Preservation Consultant Services. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 4th day of December 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of December 2006. City Administrator SEAL CONTRACT FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANT SERVICES CITY OF FARMINGTON THIS CONTRACT made and entered into as of this 4th day of December 2006, by and between the City of Farmington, Minnesota, herein referred to as the "City," and Robert C. Vogel, doing business as Pathfinder CRM, LLC, herein referred to as the "Consultant." WITNESSETH THAT WHEREAS, the City is desirous of retaining professional historic preservation services on as as-needed basis, and; WHEREAS, the Consultant is a qualified historic preservation professional. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter contained, it is agreed by and between the City and the Consultant as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant will provide the following services on as as-needed basis as determined by the City Administrator: A. Advise the City on matters relating to historic preservation planning and the identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment of historic resources; B. Attend up to six public meetings of the Heritage Preservation Commission and/or the City Council, upon the request of the City Administrator; C. Provide public information, education, and technical assistance to owners of properties designated or determined eligible for designation as Farmington Heritage Landmarks; and D. Review development plans and applications for city permits to determine their impacts on significant historic resources. II. COMPENSA nON A. The City will pay the Consultant to provide the services outlined in A, B, C, and D above, an annual retainer of four thousand dollars ($4,000.00) to be paid in lump sum at the beginning of the year 2007. B. The City may pay such additional Consultant compensation at the rate of sixty-five dollars ($65.00) per hour for additional work which may be specifically authorized by the City Council. III. COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINA nON This contract shall run from January 1, 2007, until December 31, 2007. The contract may be renewed upon a passing motion by the City Council. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, either party may terminate the contract on thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. N. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT STATUS The Consultant is an independent contractor and is not a City employee. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties have set their hands on this 4th day of December 2006. CITY OF FARMINGTON BY: Kevan Soderberg, Mayor BY: Peter J. HerIofsky, Jr., City Administrator BY: Robert Vogel, Consultant City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City AdministraZ?o /):) ( Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Di r FROM: SUBJECT: Accept Resignation Park and Recreation Advisory Commission DATE: December 4, 2006 ACTION REQUIRED Accept the resignation of Paula Higgins from the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission. DISCUSSION Paula Higgins has submitted her resignation for her position on the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission effective February 1, 2007. The term of this appointment is through January 31,2008. A copy of Ms. Higgins' resignation is attached. The remainder of Ms. Higgins' term is included in the open commission terms Council will be interviewing for on Saturday, January 6,2007. Respectfully submitted, . /1 / / _If' 2y;/'~ /r .~/l{?aL~/C Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director 7c October 5, 2006 Dear Randy; As much as I have enjoyed serving on the Park and Rec Commission and as hard as a decision as this has been, I am regretfully submitting my resignation. It had been my plan to participate on this commission until my youngest child graduated from high school, but as has been the case this year and as I look ahead, will be happening more frequently than I had planned, my son's activities conflict with the commission meetings and I won't give up my time watching his activities. I just do not think I can be effective enough missing a meeting here and two there, and I don't think that is fair to the commission. I will be happy to serve until the interviews take place and the new commission members come on board. I'm sure there will be someone qualified and enthused about taking a two year term to finish mine out. I have learned a great deal from my experience with the Park and Rec Commission. I have nothing but respect for the other commission members and the efforts that they put forth. I feel like we have accomplished a great deal in my four years and that has been rewarding. Randy, I admire you and your hard work and your extensive knowledge in your field and I know you have done great things for Farmington and have plans for many more. I don't like leaving a task half accomplished, but I like even less, doing things with less than a 100% effort, and that is what I am basing my decision on. /-1 ~~-~~~0 Paula Higgins {~ ld City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator;$? FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Approve Easement Acquisition Contract - Flagstaff Avenue Project DATE: December 4, 2006 ACTION REQUESTED Approve by motion the attached contract with Evergreen Land Services Company for easement acquisition services for the Flagstaff Avenue Project. BUDGET IMPACT The estimated amount for easement acquisition services is $66,980.00. These costs will be funded through the Flagstaff Avenue project. BACKGROUND Permanent and temporary easements from adjacent property owners will be needed to construct the Flagstaff Avenue project. Due to the number of easements needed, additional assistance will be required to acquire the necessary easements in the time frame needed to construct the Flagstaff Avenue project. Respectfully Submitted, ~ Yl1'n1~ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file November 21, 2006 rgreen LAND SERVICES COMPANY City of Farmington Mr. Lee Mann Director of Public Works 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 RE: Acquisition Services Dear Mr. Mann: Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City of Farmington with acquisition services. Evergreen Land Services (ELS) is pleased to propose the following estimate to acquire the easements needed for the 47 parcels located along Flagstaff Avenue. We have been given some information on the project and I have based this estimate on that information. Proposal Estimate: ELS is prepared to perform the following tasks: . Read and understand the appraisals performed by Patchin, Messner & Dodd. . Prepare individual parcel files. . Attend one Open House meeting. . Prepare a project update table. . Prepare individual offer letters for each parcel based on the appraisals. . Coordinating the drafting of the easement documents with City Attorney. . Present the offers and negotiate with the property owners. . Coordinating signatures of all easement documents. . Recording of the executed easement documents. . Provide you with updates on the acquisition process. . Work with the City Attorney on the potential condemnation. . Provide an Acquisition Book at the end of the project with copies of all pertinent information and documents. Appraisal. Acquisition and Relocation Specialists 4BI Old Sibley Mcmorialllighway Suite 201 Eagan, MN 55122 651-882-0200 888-411-1134 Fax: 651882-6564 ELS will perform all of the above tasks, for an estimated amount of $66,980.00. This equates to $1,425.00 per parcel to perform all tasks listed above. This estimate is based upon the rate schedule attached. This estimate is limited to 400 hours to be spent negotiating with property owners, should more time be necessary in an attempt to avoid condemnation this estimate would require revision. This estimate includes all expenses such as mileage, copies, parking, recording fees, etc. ELS invoices only for time spent on the project, projects completed in less time than anticipated, result in savings to the client. ELS invoices twice monthly for services rendered. Items Needed to Proceed: In order for ELS to proceed with this project, we would first need your acceptance of this proposal. If you accept this proposal please sign below and fax or mail your signed acceptance to ELS at the address on the letterhead. Should you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to call me at 651-882-0200. Thank you. Sincerely, ~~t~ Matthew S. Storm SR/WA President Evergreen Land Services ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The City of Farmington accepts the proposal by Evergreen Land Services Company (ELS) to acquire the necessary easements for the reconstruction of Flagstaff Avenue as detailed in the ELS proposal letter dated November 21, 2006, for an estimated amount of $66,980.00. Signature Date Please Print Name ELS Bills are to be sent to the following person and address: Please return completed form to: Matthew S. Storm Evergreen Land Services 4131 Old Sibley Memorial Highway, Suite 201 Eagan, MN 55122 2006 RATE SCHEDULE EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES COMPANY MANAGEMENT Project Manager $85.00 per hour RELOCATION SERVICES Relocation Manager Relocation Specialist $85.00 per hour $75.00 per hour ACQUISITION SERVICES Acquisition Manager Acquisition Specialist $85.00 per hour $75.00 per hour APPRAISAL SERVICES Appraisal Manager Appraiser $85.00 per hour $75.00 per hour CLERICAL Typist, Clerical $40.00 per hour EXPENSES Vehicle mileage allowance Per Diem & Expenses $0.50 per mile Actual costs 7e City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us To: City Council Joel Jamnik From: Subject: Date: Administrator Evaluation Summary Report December 4, 2006 Pursuant to the state's open meeting law (in particular, Minnesota Statutes 13D.05, Subd. 3) the City Council conducted a closed meeting as part of its November 20,2006 Regular Council Meeting to evaluate the performance of City Administrator Peter Herlofsky. The law requires that at its next open meeting, the public body shall summarize its conclusions regarding the evaluation. The review of Mr. Herlofsky was conducted pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement with the City. Under that agreement, a review is to be conducted after six months of employment and annually thereafter. The Council conducts the review using a performance evaluation survey that each Councilmember fills out anonymously which is then tabulated into a summary report. The surveys rate the Administrator's performance using a three point scale, with 1 equating to a under-expectation rating, 2 equating to a meeting-expectation rating, and a 3 equating to an exceeding-expectation rating. Mr. Herlofsky received rating averages in excess of 2 in all categories, which were: Organizational Management (2.4); FiscallBusiness Management (2.6); Program Development (2.6); Relationship with Council (2.8); Long-Range Planning (2.6+); Relationship with Public/Public Relations (2.6); Interagency Relations (2.4+), and; Professional/Personal Development (2.8+). As part of the review, areas of commendation and improvement are identified and the Council and Administrator discuss their respective expectations and requirements. The Council evaluation indicated that Mr. Herlofsky was fully meeting the expectations of all council members in all graded areas. Commendations were noted for achieving improvements with other agencies and responding/managing unforeseen events. Areas of focus for the administrator and council for the future were identified, including strategic planning and team-building. Joel J. Jamnik Campbell Knutson, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Direct Dial: 651- 234-6219 Fax: 651-452-5550 Email: iiamnik@ck-law.com ?5a..... City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, Council Members, City Administray? Robin Roland, Finance Director l:J TO: SUBJECT: Truth in Taxation Hearing DATE: December 4, 2006 INTRODUCTION The City Council adopted a proposed Tax Levy and budget for 2007 with Resolution R104-06 at the Council meeting on September 14, 2006 and established the Truth in Taxation Hearing to take place at the City Council meeting of December 4, 2006. DISCUSSION & BUDGET IMPACT The Truth in Taxation Hearing is held pursuant to State Statute to receive input from residents and other concerned citizens on the proposed budget and tax levy. The hearing will include a presentation by staff of the highlights of the City's proposed 2007 Revenue and Expenditure Budget and the 2007 Proposed Tax levy. Residents have received property specific notices outlining the proposed effect of the 2007 tax levy on their individual property taxes compared to the taxes levied against their property in 2006. The hearing will give residents the opportunity to share their comments and concerns about the proposed 2007 levy and budget. ACTION REQUIRED Receive input on the Proposed 2007 Budget and Tax Levy. Close the public hearing after taking all testimony. Adoption of the Final Budget and Levy will take place at the December 18, 2006 City Council meeting. :&#? Robin Roland Finance Director 2007 TRUTH IN TAXATION City of Farmington City Council presentation December 4, 2006 2007 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS · Proposed levy for all purposes is $7,926,780 or 18.90/0 over the 2006 levy of $6,668,204. · General fund revenues are estimated at $8,514,690 with 72.30/0 from property taxes. · No levy limit in 2007. 1 2007 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS · Expenditures are proposed to increase by 9.7% over 2006 adopted budget. Excluding capital outlay, the increase is 7.30/0. · The City's net tax base increased by 230/0 for pay 2007, due to the decertification of 4 TIF districts. 2007 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS · Capital outlay for 2007 of $185,400 is included in the General Fund expenditures. · Staffing changes include the reduction of a 3/4 time building inspector and an increase to full- time from part time Communications specialist. 1 REVENUES 2006 Adopted vs. 2007 Proposed 2006 Adopted 2007 Proposed % change Taxes $ 5,298,201 $ 6,160,490 16.2% Permits/Licenses 1,006,756 906,200 (10.0%) Intergovernmental 350,000 370,000 5.7% Charges 439,000 452,000 3.0% Fines 83,100 79,000 (5.0%) Interest 225,000 225,000 - Other 13,500 32,000 237% Transfers In 347,900 290,000 (16.7%) Total $7,763,457 8,514,690 9.7% 2007 General Fund Revenues Permits 11% 3 EXPENDITURES 2006 Adopted vs. 2007 Proposed 2006 Adopted 2007 Proposed % change Administration $650,710 $720,216 10.7% HRlIT 332,944 231,626 (30.0%) Finance 457,719 485,545 6.1% Comm. Devlp. 359,348 431,765 20.1% Police 2,679,280 3,179,630 18.7% Fire/Rescue 531,006 616,827 16.2% Public Works 1,515,059 1,544,081 2.0% Parks & Rec. 1,029,861 1,147,470 11.4% Transfers out 207,530 157,530 (24.1%) Total 7,763,457 8,514,690 9.7% 2007 General Fund Expenditures Par1<s&Rec 13% Transfers out Admin 2% 8% Pub Works 18% ~~ .... ~..~ 4 Summary · Tax levy increase 18.9% over 2006; General Fund 16% . · Revenues overall increase is 9.7%. · Expenditures up 9.7%; · Proposed tax levy results in a 2007 tax capacity rate of 41.872 compared to 2006 of 42.770. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o Gl Revenues o Expend . Fund Sal 2004 200S 2006 2007 SUMMARY (con't.) · Market value of median value home: 2006 = $229,400, 2007 = $243,500 · Market value increase 6.10/0 · City portion of taxes payable median value home: 2006 = $981, 2007 = $1,019 5 Growth in Budget, Tax Base & Levy 2002 to 2007 50 40 30 20 10 o 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 -+- Budget ~ Tax base -a- Levy 6 ASSOCIATION OF ~ MINNESOTA COUNTIES ~~ . .,',.'.- "..-.. .....W....",.. ""-""".W,"',',',,_:T Minnesota School m " Boards Association . . II' ." . League of Minnesota Cities Cities promoting excellence LMC Who Does Wlaa,t~ A 6lUDIE to MlNNES01A'$ P.I()iPER,." ,. A>< SVSIEM .. . .... .. ,',. . "..... " ............. ...... ...". .... ... .... . ASSESSOR Locates the property to be taxed, estimates its market value (how much the property would sell for in today's market), and assigns it to a class according to its use. Sends out notices in the spring to "all property owners," Multiplies the estimated market value of each piece of property by the tax capacity percentage set by law for its class, The result is the tax capacity, Adds together the tax capacities for all the.property in the taxing district and gives the total to: ... Property owners who disagree with the assessor may appeal to: . TAXING DISTRICTS . . (YOUR SCHOOL DISTRICT, CITY OR TOWNSHIP, COUNTY, ETC.) . .... . . Determine the services (such as street maintenance, fire and police protection) to be provided in the coming year. Estimate the costs of those services and determine what portion will come from property taxes. Prepare proposed budget/levy amounts Send final levy amounts to: ...................... Hold Truth-in-Taxation (TnT) hearings on budgets (if required by state law), Send final levy amounts to:. · · . . · · · · . · · · · · · · · · · · · · . . BOARDS OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION . . . . . . . . CITY OR TOWNSHIP BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION: The city councilor township board, Meets between April 1 and May 31. FINANCE DEPARTMENT AUDITOR/TREASURER . . . Determines the tax capacity rates and also uses the state general tax rate by dividing the proposed levy by the proposed total amount of tax capacity in the taxing district. Auditor uses state general tax rate to compute taxes (certified by the Commissioner of MN Dept. of Revenue), Calculates the amount of each property owner's proposed state paid credits and net tax amount. Prepares TnT notice and mails to each taxpayer. Recalculates the amount of each property owner's tax based upon the final levy amounts. Prepares a listing of the tax on all property owners in the county and gives the list to:_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION: County board of commissioners, Meets for two weeks in June. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION: Commissioner of Revenue. Meets between April 15 and June 30. The review board may change the estimate of the market value of the classification. Creates the property tax statements from the county tax lists, Mails the statements by March 31 of the following year. Property owners mail in their payments (due in two installments on May 15 and October 15; except that the second installment of taxes on agricultural property is due on November 15), MINNESOTA TAX COURT: Small claims or regular division, . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . De YBu1hink YauJr P1ro/,,Q"1y i;s ()ver-Assessed~ THE DIAGRAM BELOW SHOWS THE STEPS IN CONTESTING YOUR PROPERTY VALUATION: VISIT YOUR LOCAL ASSESSOR'S OFFICE . Check the facts, . Compare neighboring property values. · Seek an adjustment. .. 3-STEP APPEAL .. .............. . . . . . . . . . APPEAL TO CITY OR TOWNSHIP "BOARD OF REVIEW,t . Meets in April or May. . Appeals in person or by letter. . Call city or township clerk for appointment. . . 1-STEP APPEAL: .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . APPEAL TO COUNTY "BOARD OF EQUALlZATIONIf . Meets for two weeks in June. . Appeal in person or by letter. . Call county auditor or assessor for appointment. . . . .. . . . . . . . . APPEAL TO MINNESOTA TAX COURT . Appeal by April 30 of year following assessment. . . . . . . . . . .............. . .. . SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION · Attorney not necessary. · Decisions are final. · Use for your home, or any property assessed under $100,000. REGULAR DIVISION . Attorney recommended. . Decisions appealable to Supreme Court. . Can be used for any property. . Must be used for property assessed over $100,000. /P1role1f!t,.1'~ Clil~~i}{(jt'ifil1A! RfltlJI~ WHAT THEY ARE, HOWTHEYWORK The classification rates on selected properties for taxes payable are shown below: PROPERTY TYPE Disabled homestead up to $32,000 Residential Homestead Up to $500,000 Over $500,000 Residential Nonhomestead 2 Single unit Up to $500,000 Over $500,000 2-3 unit and undeveloped land Apartments Regular '06 CLASS RATE PROPERTY TYPE '06 CLASS RATE 0.045% Seasonal Recreational Residential Up to $500,000 1.00 1.00 Over $500,000 1.25 1.25 Agricultural land & Buildings Homestead 3 Up to $600,000 0.55 Over $600,000 1,00 1.00 Nonhomestead 1.00 1.25 Miscellaneous Properties 1.25 Golf courses (open to public) 1.25 Nonprofit service organizations 1.5 Fraternity/sorority houses 1.00 1.25 Manufactured home park land 1.25 Metro indoor ree. facilities 1,25 Noncommercial aircraft hangars 1.5 Commercial-Industrial-Public Utility Up to S 150,000 1.5 Over $150,000 2.00 Electric generation machinery 2.00 Seasonal Recreational Commercial Homestead resorts 1 ,00 Seasonal resorts Up to $500,000 1.00 Over $500,000 1.25 1 School operating referendum levies (sometimes called "excess levy" referenda) and all county, city, and township referendum levies are levied on referendum market value, School debt levies are levied against all property based on net tax capacity, 2 Includes dwellings located on agricultural non homestead property, 3 House, garage, and one acre have same class rates and are generally treated the same as residential homestead. How to use classification rates: Example: Suppose your home is valued at $90,000 and your local tax rate is 1.35 (135% of tax capacity) Then: Your Home's Tax Capacity = $90,000 times .01 =$900 Your Property Tax = $900 times 1.35 = $1,215 1!'f/,:X f;;lossl/fry ATEGORICAL AID: Aid given to a local unit of government to be used only for a specific purpose, CIRCUIT BREAKER: See "Property Tax Refund," CLASS RATES: The percent of market value set by state law that establishes the property's tax capacity subject to the property tax. COUNTY PROGRAM AID: State property tax relief aid to counties, distributed with a formula based on needs (households on foodstamps, age of the population, number of serious crimes) and tax base equalization for counties with smaller tax bases. EDUCATION AID: The total amount of state dollars paid for K-12 education, This aid is paid to the school districts. FISCAL DISPARITIES: A program in the Twin Cities metropolitan area and on the iron range in which a portion of the commercial and industrial property value of each city and township is contributed to a tax base sharing pool. Each city and township then receives a distribution of property value from the pool based on market value and population in each city. GENERAL PURPOSE AID: Aid given to units of government to be used at their own discretion. Examples are Local Government Aid and County Program Aid, IGHWAY AID: Motorfuels tax and license tab money the state distributes to counties, cities and townships for highways and bridges. HOMESTEAD: A residence occupied by the owner. INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX: A state tax on the income of residents and non-residents with Minnesota sources of income that is deposited into the state general fund. LEVY: The imposition of a tax, associated with the property tax, LEVY LIMIT: The amounta local unitofgovernment is permitted to levy for specific services under state law. LIMITED MARKET VALUE: A state imposed limit on property value increases for the purpose of calculating property taxes, ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID (LGA): A state government revenue sharing program for cities with low property wealth or high service burdens that is intended to provide an alternative to the property tax, LOCAL SALES TAX: A local tax, authorized by the state, levied on the sale of goods and services to be used for specific purposes by the local government LOCAL TAX RATE: The tax rate usually expressed as a percentage of tax capacity, used to determine the property tax due on a property, MARKET VALUE: An assessor's estimate of what property would be worth if it were sold. MARKET VALUE AGRICULTURE CREDIT: A state credit to reduce the property tax paid by agricultural homesteads to the local taxing jurisdiction, MARKET VALUE HOMESTEAD CREDIT: A state credit to reduce the property tax paid by a residential homestead to the local taxing jurisdiction. PROPERTY TAX: A tax levied on any kind of property, PROPERTY TAX REFUND: A partial property tax refund program for those who have property taxes out of proportion with their income, This program is available to homeowners and renters, SALES RATIO STUDY: A study conducted by the Department of Revenue of open market property sales, which is then comp.ared to local assessments to ensure that local assessments adequately reflect the market STATE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX: A state-imposed property tax on commercial, industrial, and seasonal recreational properties, STATE SALES TAX: A state tax (65%) levied on the sale of goods and services that is deposited into the state general fund, TAX CAPACITY: The valuation of property based on market value and class rates, on which property taxes are determined. November 2006 ~ Minnesota School m- Boards Association II ... LMC ,AINNESOTA COUNTIES League of },;[innesota Cities Cities promoting excellence www.mncounties.org www.mnmsba.org www.lmnc.org ASSOCIATION OF ~~ ~ "" '" .."\II""",.""...,.".".".,,,., .... Minnesota School' t:W'Eioards Association' ,.... ".", ,....-. .,'" . ........ II.."'''''<..,....~..~., .....;..".,.;~"'_.. MINNESOTA COUNTIES · LMC League of Minnesota Cities Cities promoting excellence Fourteen Reasons W..';H".. "~V: P,~'R'~ .,;O,'gI;R,~ ..T"'V.:,:' T....A.X...i;S. \~A~i~V,., I .~,., , .... . ,rl:;. ,. "..r..' C .' Vo ii"" " F'.R:< "Q':"M' Y'E::'AR':: T~'Q:"'" 'I":El:'A' 'R': . ,~" '.:.' " i '.> '. .,' i" .. / 11,. " :fi': 1, THE MARKET VALUE OF A PROPERTY MAY CHANGE. 3, . Each parcel of property is assessed at least once every five years and a sales ratio study is done to determine if the property is assess similarly to like properties. If not, the Commissioner of Revenue may issue an 'order' that would affect the taxable value of a parcel. . Additions and improvement made to a property generally increases its market value. THE MARKET VALUE OF OTHER PROPERTIES IN YOUR TAXING DISTRICT MAY CHANGE, SHIFTING TAXES FROM ONE PROPERTY TO ANOTHER. . If the market value of a property increases more or less than the average increase or decrease in a taxing district, the taxes on that property will also change. . New construction in a taxing district increases the tax base and will affect the district's tax rate. THE STATE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX MAY CHANGE. . The state legislature directly applies a State General Property Tax to commercial/industrial and season/recreational property classes. s, B ::~C .. THE CITY BUDGET AND lEVY MAY CHANGE. . Each year, cities review the needs and wants of their citizens and how to meet those needs and wants. This is called 'discretionary spending' in the city budget. Also included in the budget is non-discretionary spending which is required by state and federal mandates and court decisions and orders. THE TOWNSHIP BUDGET AND LEVY MAY CHANGE. . Each March, townships set the levy and budget for the next year. THE COUNTY BUDGET AND lEVY MAY CHANGE. . Each year, counties review the needs and wants of their citizens and how to meet those discretionary needs and wants. In addition, also included in the county budget is non- discretionary spending which is required by state and federal mandates and court decisions and orders. As much as sixty to eighty-five percent of the county expenditures are used to deliver mandated services. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S BUDGET AND lEVY MAY CHANGE. . The Legislature determines basic funding levels for K-12 education and mandates services that schools must perform. On average, approximately seventy percent of school costs are paid by the state. . . Local school districts set levies for purposes including safe school and community education, etc. A SPECIAL DISTRICT'S BUDGET AND lEVY MAY CHANGE. . Special districts such as the Metropolitan Council, hospital districts, watershed districts, drainage districts, etc. set levies to balance their budgets. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS MAY BE ADDED TO YOUR PROPERTVTAX Bill. . Water lines, curb and gutter, and street improvements that directly benefit your property may be funded, in whole or in part, through a special assessment that is added to your tax bill. 1 VOTERS MAY HAVE APPROVED A SCHOOL, CITYI .. TOWNSHIP, COUNTY, OR SPECIAL DISTRICT , REFERENDUM. . Local referendums may be held for local government construction projects, excess operating levies for schools or many other purposes. . Referendum levies may be spread on the market value or the tax capacity of a property depending on process and type of referendum levy. 1...... '.....1.1.. '....p.... FEDERAL AND ,., < .... .. CHANGED. STATE MANDATES MAY HAVE . Both the state and federal governments require local governments to provide certain services and follow certain rules. These mandates often require an increase in the cost and level of service delivery. 1 AID AND REVENUE FROM THE STATE AND FEDERAL " GOVERNMENTS MAY HAVE CHANGED. . Each year the state legislature reviews and adjusts the level of funding for a variety of aids provided to local governments including Local Government Aid and County Program Aid. The formulas for how aid is determined and distributed among local governments may have changed. . While direct aid and revenue from the federal government to local governments has declined greatly in recent years, federal revenue continues to be a key portion of the local government revenue stream and that revenue stream may have changed. 1.....;3.......'.'..'....'..'.">.... THE STATE LEGISLATURE MAY HAVE CHANGED THE ..i."',, PORTION OF THE TAX BASE PAID BY DIFFERENT TYPES OF PROPERTIES. . A change in class rates will require a change in the tax rate to raise the same amount of money. 1'4 ~i . .''f' i- f'" OTHER STATE LAW CHANGES MAY ADJUST THE TAX BASE. . Fiscal disparities, personal property taxes on utility properties, limited market value, and tax increment financing are example of laws that affect property taxes. GI1l~~qllFJ; oflle1;.~ ATEGORICAL AID: Aid given to a local unit of government to be used only for a specific purpose. CIRCUIT BREAKER: See "Property Tax Refund," CLASS RATES: The percent of market value set by state law that establishes the property's tax capacity subject to the property tax, COUNTY PROGRAM AID: State property tax relief aid to counties, distributed with a formula based on needs (households on foodstamps, age of the population, number of serious crimes) and tax base equalization for counties with smaller tax bases. EDUCATION AID: The total amount of state dollars paid for K- 12 education, This aid is paid to the school districts. FISCAL DISPARITIES: A program in the Twin Cities metropolitan area and on the iron range in which a portion of the commercial and industrial property value of each city and township is contributed to a tax base sharing pool. Each city and township then receives a distribution of property value from the pool based on market value and population in each city. GENERAL PURPOSE AID: Aid given to units ofgovernmentto be used at their own discretion. Examples are Local Government Aid and County Program Aid, IGHWAY AID: Motor fuels tax and license tab money the state distributes to counties, cities and townships for highways and bridges. HOMESTEAD: A residence occupied by the owner, INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX: A state tax on the income of residents and non-residents with Minnesota sources of income that is deposited into the state general fund. LEVY: The imposition of a tax, associated with the property tax. LEVY LIMIT: The amount a local unit of government is permitted to levy for specific services under state law. LIMITED MARKET VALUE: A state imposed limit on property value increases for the purpose of calculating property taxes. ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID (LGA): A state government revenue sharing program for cities with low property wealth or high service burdens that is intended to provide an alternative to the property tax. LOCAL SALES TAX: A local tax, authorized by the state, levied on the sale of goods and services to be used for specific purposes by the local government LOCAL TAX RATE: The tax rate usually expressed as a percentage of tax capacity, used to determine the property tax due on a property, MARKET VALUE: An assessor's estimate of what property would be worth if it were sold, MARKET VALUE AGRICULTURE CREDIT: A state credit to reduce the property tax paid by agricultural homesteads to the local taxing jurisdiction, MARKET VALUE HOMESTEAD CREDIT: A state credit to reduce the property tax paid by a residential homestead to the local taxing jurisdiction. PROPERTY TAX: A tax levied on any kind of property. PROPERTYTAX REFUND: A partial property tax refund program for those who have property taxes out of proportion with their income, This program is available to homeowners and renters, SALES RATIO STUDY: A study conducted by the Department of Revenue of open market property sales, which is then compared to local assessments to ensure that local assessments adequately reflect the market STATE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX: A state-imposed property tax on commercial, industrial, and seasonal recreational properties. STATE SALES TAX: A state tax (65%) levied on the sale of goods and services that is deposited into the state general fund. TAX CAPACITY: The valuation of property based on market value and class rates, on which property taxes are determined, November 2006 '\'Ii Minnesota School m Boards Association --II ... I~INNESOTA COUNTIES LMC League of }.linnesota Cities Cities promoting excellence www.mncounties.org www.mnmsba.org www.lmnc.org ~b City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administra& FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Consider Resolution - Designating Farmington Heritage Landmarks DATE: December 4,2006 ACTION REQUESTED Adopt a resolution designating the T.C. Davis House, 520 Oak Street, and the Duff-Betzold House, 500 Spruce Street, as Farmington Heritage Landmarks on the Official City Zoning Map. DISCUSSION In 2005 Council approved a Certified Local Government Grant so the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) could begin a local designation project to designate six residential properties Farmington Heritage Landmarks. At the November 6, 2006, meeting Council set three public hearings to designate the six properties. The first two properties to be designated are: . The T.C. Davis House, 520 Oak Street . The Duff-Betzold House, 500 Spruce Street The HPC has determined that the properties at 520 Oak Street and 500 Spruce Street meet the eligibility criteria for designation as Farmington Heritage Landmarks under City Code 2-11-4(A). The HPC has submitted documentation supporting the Heritage Landmark designation of these properties in a report prepared by Robert Vogel and the documents have been forwarded to the Minnesota Historical Society for review. The property owners have reviewed the documents, submitted comments and given approval to the HPC to move forward with the designation process. Respectfully submitted, / .:? -1~' Ae he /I,dAt1d~~, Lisa Shadick -- Administrative Services Director cc: Steven and Lisa Bolduc, 520 Oak Street Loren Schulz, 500 Spruce Street Robert Vogel, HPC Consultant HPC Members RESOLUTION NO. R -06 DESIGNATING THE T.C. DAVIS HOUSE, AND THE DUFF-BETZOLD HOUSE AS FARMINGTON HERITAGE LANDMARKS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 4th day of December 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, the Farmington City Council has declared as a matter of public policy that the preservation, protection, perpetuation, and use of significant historic properties is a matter of public necessity; and, WHEREAS, the Heritage Preservation Commission has determined that the T.C. Davis House, and the Duff-Betzold House, meet the eligibility criteria for designation as Farmington Heritage Landmarks under City Code 2-11-4(A); and, WHEREAS, the Heritage Preservation Commission has submitted documentation supporting Heritage Landmark designation of the T.C. Davis House, and the Duff-Betzold House in reports prepared by Robert C. Vogel, Preservation Planning Consultant, dated August 2006; and, WHEREAS, the Minnesota Historical Society is expected to comment favorably on the proposed landmark designations; and, WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed landmark designations was held in the City Council Chambers in City Hall on December 4, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. The T.C. Davis House, and the Duff-Betzold House are designated as Farmington Heritage Landmarks. 2. The T.C. Davis House, and the Duff-Betzold House will be noted as heritage landmarks on the Official City Zoning Map. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 4th day of December 2006. Mayor day of December 2006. Attested to the City Administrator SEAL HERITAGE LANDMARK PLANNING REPORT THE HISTORIC T. C. DAVIS HOUSE, 520 OAK STREET Prepared by Robert C. Vogel Preservation Planning Consultant August 2006 INTRODUCTION This report documents the historical and architectural significance of the historic T. C. Davis House, 520 Oak Street. The report makes the case for the property's eligibility for designation as a Farmington Heritage Landmark pursuant to S2-11-4 of the City Code. Farmington Heritage Landmarks are the buildings, sites, and districts so designated by the City Council in recognition of their historical, architectural, archaeological, and cultural significance. Properties are nominated for landmark designation by the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) following a public hearing. Once a property has been designated a Farmington Heritage Landmark by the City Council, this report becomes part of the official designation record. ADMINISTRATIVE DATA Name of Property: The name of the property nominated for Heritage Landmark designation is the T. C. Davis House. Property Owners: Steven and Lisa Bolduc. Location: 520 Oak Street; Humphrey's Addition. HPC Determination of Eligibility: The Farmington HPC has evaluated the Davis House and found that it meets the Heritage Landmark eligibility criteria. A Finding of Significance was issued by the HPC in March 1998. Classification: For preservation planning purposes, the Davis House is considered a historic building. Historic and Current Function/Use: The property historically functioned as a single-family residence; in 2006 it opened for business as the T. C. Davis Manor Bed and Breakfast. DESCRIPTION Architectural Classification: The Davis House is an example of the Queen Anne Style Cottage heritage resource type. Heritage Landmark Planning Report, 520 Oak Street - 1 Boundaries: The boundaries of the proposed heritage landmark are those of the parcel historically associated with the Davis House. Narrative Description: The historic T. C. Davis House is a two story, frame suburban cottage with Queen Anne Style detailing. It has an irregular plan, a pyramidal hip roof, dormers, bay windows, and a square tower or cupola. The exterior walls are finished with horizontal imitation wood grain vinyl siding (over the original clapboards) that makes the walls look solid and of one piece; a thin decorative band of dentils (small, square blocks of wood) below the cornice molding. Because of its shape, the roof profile is one of the property's principal design elements: it is so forceful that it separates itself from the main body of the house, which obliged the builder to find ways to make sure that the roof did not overpower the fagade. This was accomplished by breaking the roof into different shapes and pitches, by using siding, cornice and trim boards to emphasize horizontal lines, and by varying the pattern of fenestration. The front porch and side bay windows are not large design elements, but they reinforces the picturesque character of the fagade and help balance the vertical thrust of the pyramidal roof and tower. The house shows the influence of the Queen Anne (and to a lesser extent, Eastlake) Style in its multiple roof forms, asymmetrical massing, interconnected interior and exterior spaces, tall windows with large panes of glass, and the distinctive three story tower with its mansard roof. Exterior ornamentation is strongly geometric, more Eastlake than Queen Anne. The tower, for example, is square rather than round or hexagonal and is capped by a concave (bell-cast) mansard rather than a conical "witch's hat" roof commonly seen on Queen Anne cottages. The color scheme is also considerably more subdued than the typical "painted lady": the house is painted white with dark green trim and mauve accents. The T. C. Davis House is the largest private home in the Oak Street Historic Preservation Planning Area, a neighborhood dominated by detached single- family homes and tree-lined streets. The building site is level and the property occupies a large (one-half acre) corner lot. The present owners purchased the house in 2002 with the intention of converting part of it to commercial use as a bed and breakfast inn. They undertook numerous repairs to the house and have landscaped the grounds with flower beds, two water features, and a foot bridge which, along with other picturesque landscaping, help to create a distinctive historic scene. A small frame garage with Victorian styling is set on the alley to the south of the house; built in 1984, it compliments the Victorian period character of the property. Heritage Landmark Planning Report, 520 Oak Street - 2 EVALUATION Applicable Heritage Landmark Criteria: The Davis House is eligible for Heritage Landmark designation because it embodies the distinctive characteristics of the Queen Anne Style. It is also historically significant for its association with the broad pattern of residential development in the Oak Street neighborhood. Local Historic Context: The Davis House was evaluated within the local historic context, "Residential Neighborhoods, 1865 to 1950," delineated in the city's 1995 historic context study. Area(s) of Significance: The Davis House is significant in the areas of architectural history (Late Victorian) and neighborhood heritage (Oak Street). Period of Significance: The Davis House attained historical significance qualifying it for Heritage Landmark designation when it was built in 1875. Architect/Builder. The house was probably not designed by a professional architect. The name of the original builder/contractor is not known. Narrative Statement of Significance: The T. C. Davis House is an outstanding example of late-nineteenth century cottage architecture and Farmington's best-preserved specimen of the Queen Anne Style. Contextually, it relates to the early development of Farmington's oldest residential neighborhood and represents the theme of Late Victorian period domestic architecture. All of the Victorian period styles rely upon a picturesque massing of a variety of shapes and textures in a non-symmetrical composition. ("Victorian" is a catch-all term for picturesquely styled homes built during the reign of Britain's Queen Victorian (1837-1901), but in the rural Midwest some of the Victorian period styles remained popular up until World War I.) The Queen Anne Style, perhaps the most recognizable of the Victorian styles, was particularly flamboyant; cottages built in this style are characterized by their irregular plans, variation in surface treatments, extensive porches and towers, classical detailing, gingerbread spindlework, and leaded stained-glass windows. In 1876, the architectural critic Henry Hudson Holly declared that the Queen Anne was "the natural building style for America," though in Farmington, full-blown versions of the Queen Anne mode were never numerous. All of the Queen Anne styled houses we know about were built between the 1870's and the late 1880's, and it is believed that the style's complexity contributed to its rather short-lived popularity (though "Folk Victorian" detailing remained in vogue until World War I). Thomas C. Davis was reported to be the wealthiest man in Farmington. He came to Minnesota after making a fortune during the California Gold Rush and had Heritage Landmark Planning Report, 520 Oak Street - 3 extensive land holdings and business interests in Dakota County after the Civil War. In 1872 Davis was elected to the first board of trustees when the village of Farmington was incorporated. In 1876 he and Claus Dittman received a charter for the Bank of Farmington; after the bank was destroyed in the great fire of 1879, they built a new bank at the corner of Third and Oak, which was renamed the Exchange Bank in 1884. (The Exchange Bank, 344 Third Street, was built in 1881 and is both a Farmington Heritage Landmark and listed in the National Register of Historic Places.) Davis and his wife Elizabeth were members of the community's social and economic elite. Some sources give 1875 as the date of construction for the house at 520 Oak Street; others indicate the Davis residence was not built until 1887-both dates are well within the Queen Anne Style timeline. The house is clearly shown on the earliest maps of Farmington and several early twentieth century photographs of the property exist in archival collections. The property has changed hands many times and in the process it has acquired numerous associations with people and events in the community. Although the Davis House has lost some of its historic integrity as a result of remodelings, it possesses integrity of location, design, setting, workmanship and association and continues to express many typical Queen Anne design characteristics. All of its primary character defining features have been retained, including ground plan, roof shape, tower, window and door openings, and porches; as well as many of the original interior features and finishes. The house was constructed at the height of the Queen Anne cottage movement and is one of very few remaining homes in Farmington built prior to 1900. In May 2006, the Farmington HPC presented the owners of the T. C. Davis House with its annual Heritage Preservation Award in recognition of their efforts to preserve and rehabilitate the Davis House. BIBLIOGRAPHY Curtiss-Wedge, Franklyn (editor). History of Dakota County. Chicago, 1910. Dakota County Assessor. Property appraisal card for 520 Oak Street (PIN 14- 33900-030-01 ). Pinkney, B. P. Plat Book of Dakota County, Minnesota. Philadelphia, 1896. Sanborn Map Co. Fire insurance maps of Farmington, 1885-1928. Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Vogel, Robert C. Farmington Historic Context Document: Final Report of the Historic Context Study, 1994-1995. City of Farmington, Heritage Preservation Commission, July 1995. Heritage Landmark Planning Report, 520 Oak Street - 4 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION Included as attachments: 1) Map showing the location of 520 Oak Street. 2) Photography (May 2006) showing front and side elevations. Heritage Landmark Planning Report, 520 Oak Street - 5 . . . 520 Oak Street . . . . . . HERITAGE LANDMARK PLANNING REPORT DUFF-BETZOLD HOUSE, 500 SPRUCE STREET Prepared by Robert C. Vogel Preservation Planning Consultant August 2006 INTRODUCTION This report documents the historical and architectural significance of the property commonly known as the Duff-Betzold House, 500 Spruce Street. The report makes the case for the property's eligibility for designation as a Farmington Heritage Landmark pursuant to S2-11-4 of the City Code. Farmington Heritage Landmarks are the buildings, sites, and districts so designated by the City Council in recognition of their historical, architectural, archaeological, and cultural significance. Properties are nominated for landmark designation by the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) following a public hearing. Once a property has been designated a Farmington Heritage Landmark by the City Council, this report becomes part of the official designation record. ADMINISTRATIVE DATA Name of Property: The common name of the property nominated for Heritage Landmark designation is Duff-Betzold House. Property Owner. Loren G. and Leiann M. Schulz. Location: 500 Spruce Street; Lot 6 and part of Lot 5, Block 3, Betzold's Second Addition. HPC Determination of Eligibility: The Farmington HPC has evaluated subject property and found that it meets the Heritage Landmark eligibility criteria. A Finding of Significance was issued by the HPC in 2006. Classification: For preservation planning purposes, the house at 500 Spruce Street is considered a historic building. Historic and Current Function/Use: Single-family residence. DESCRIPTION Architectural Classification: The Duff-Betzold is an example of the Gable Front and Wing Cottage heritage resource type. Heritage Landmark Planning Report, 500 Spruce Street - 1 Boundaries: The boundaries of the proposed heritage landmark are those of the parcel historically associated with subject property. Narrative Description: The house at 500 Spruce Street is a two story, frame, Gable Front and Wing Cottage type dwelling with a compound plan, intersecting gable roofs, and an open front porch. This is a large and plain house with a simple form, balanced fenestration, and clean lines; the fa(fade is nearly devoid of ornamentation. The horizontal siding (originally clapboard, now simulated clapboard in vinyl) extends into the gables and makes the walls look solid and of one piece. The house assumes its characteristic shape and much of its architectural character from the right-angle intersection of the two large roofs, however. The open gables are broader than usual and rely on geometry to express design and give the roof a strong outline; they also make the body of the house appear more volumetric, in comparison with other houses in the area. The open porch or veranda wraps around the front and part of the side of the upright wing; it has square posts and turned wooden balusters and is a major design element in its own right, designed to be useful as well as pleasing to the eye. The upper floor windows also reinforce the relationship between the gable-end walls and the body of the house. There is a one story addition on the back. The house is located in the Oak Street Historic Preservation Planning Area, a neighborhood of detached single-family homes and tree-lined streets. The building site is level and the property occupies a somewhat larger than standard- sized (.39 acre) corner lot. A contemporary frame detached garage is located south of the house on the back part of the lot, with access from Fifth Street. EVALUATION Applicable Heritage Landmark Criteria: The Duff-Betzold House is eligible for Heritage Landmark designation because it embodies the distinctive characteristics of the Gable Front and Wing Cottage heritage resource type. It is also historically significant for its association with the broad pattern of residential development in the Oak Street neighborhood. Local Historic Context: Subject property was evaluated within the local historic context, "Residential Neighborhoods, 1865 to 1950," delineated in the city's 1995 historic context study. Area(s) of Significance: The Duff-Betzold House is significant in the areas of architectural history (vernacular) and neighborhood heritage (Oak Street). Period of Significance: The house attained historical significance qualifying it for Heritage Landmark designation when it was built in 1915. Heritage Landmark Planning Report, 500 Spruce Street - 2 ArchitecVBuilder. The house was probably not designed by a professional architect. The names of the original builder/contractor is not known. Narrative Statement of Significance: The Duff-Betzold House is historically significance because of its association with the "suburban cottage movement" in architectural history and is a well preserved example of the Gable Front and Wing Cottage heritage resource type. Contextually, it relates to the early development of Farmington's oldest residential neighborhood and represents the theme of vernacular domestic arch itectu reo Gable Front and Wing (sometimes referred to as the "Upright and Wing") is the generic term used to describe several related cottage forms that were popular in Farmington during the period that lasted from the 1880's until the 1920's. They are classified as vernacular architecture because their form, plan, structure, and ornamentation was based on common, traditional notions of what everyday Americans thought a proper house should look like, rather than the "high-style" fashionability reflected in the academic period style designations such as Queen Anne, Italianate, and Colonial Revival. Vernacular cottage architecture flourished throughout the United States during the second half of the nineteenth century and was widely promoted in the pattern books of Andrew Jackson Downing, Alexander Jackson Davis, Daniel Topping Atwood, and others. Industrialization and the growth of the railway system meant that siding, roofing, windows, doors, and decorative trim could be mass-produced in factories or turned out by local craftsmen using sophisticated woodworking machinery. Farmington area home builders were able to literally shop the local lumberyards and hardware stores for stylish architectural features and high-grade construction materials to match their personal tastes and finances. Early vernacular cottages were based on traditional folk house prototypes, but after about 1880 a new class of modest dwellings began to be seen. These "suburban cottages" were also based on standard pattern book plans, but unlike the folk house-derived forms they reflected the technological innovations and changing socio-economic climate of the post-Victorian era. Suburban cottages strove to meet middle-class notions of comfort and beauty by providing more room and modest ornamental treatment, often combining boxy, two-story plans with eye-catching details such as turned porch posts and balustrades, oriel windows, sawn shingle siding, and leading glass. Needless to say, the overwhelming majority of these houses were built by local carpenters or contractors without any participation from architects. The Gable Front and Wing house type occurs in Farmington in both the folk house and suburban cottage forms. The property type is defined entirely in terms of its volumetric characteristics. The ground plan takes the shape of an L and is sited so that the fagade comprises a gabled upright and a perpendicular Heritage Landmark Planning Report, 500 Spruce Street - 3 side wing of varying dimensions. (After about 1890, Gable Front and Wing cottages sometimes assumed a T-shaped ground plan.) In the suburban cottage form, the apexes of both roofs are nearly always the same height. Property tax records give 1915 as the date of construction for 500 Spruce Street and the property is clearly shown on the 1917 and 1928 Sanborn fire insurance maps. Nothing is known about the original owner or the property's possible links to important people and events in Farmington area history. It's heritage preservation value is derived entirely from its significance in architectural history. Subject property is in a good state of preservation. Although it has been altered from its historic appearance by the application of artificial siding and contemporary windows, these changes have not removed or obscured the original plan, form, and structure which are its most important historic character- defining features. BIBLIOGRAPHY Dakota County Assessor. Property appraisal card for 500 Spruce Street (PIN 14- 13701-060-03). Sanborn Map Co. Fire insurance maps of Farmington, 1885-1928. Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Vogel, Robert C. Farmington Historic Context Document: Final Report of the Historic Context Study, 1994-1995. City of Farmington, Heritage Preservation Commission, July 1995. "Suburban Cottages, Bungalows, Farm Houses & Ramblers: Vernacular Domestic Architecture in Farmington, 1865-1965." Unpublished historic context background paper, Farmington Heritage Resources Survey, 2001. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION Included as attachments: 1) Map showing the location of 500 Spruce Street. 2) Photography (May 2006) showing principal and side elevations. Heritage Landmark Planning Report, 500 Spruce Street - 4 Late 1800s Feb., 1897 Nov., 1910 July, 1913 ????,19l5 Oct., 1945 Sept., 1985 June, 1994 Aug., 1997 Nov., 1998 500 Spruce St. Farmington, Minnesota Sylvanus Jenkins homesteaded 19'1. acres ofland in the area of Minnesota now known as Farmington. George F. & Katherine A. Betzold purchased the land from Sylvanus Jenkins. the land was fIrst subdivided and an area called: George F. Betzold's Addition to Farmington was created on part of the land. the land was again subdivided and an area called: George F. Betzold's 2nd Addition to Farmington was created on part of the land. Lots were 60 feet wide and 170 feet deep. 500 Spruce St. - a parcel 100 feet by 170 feet was created: Lot 6 and west 40 feet of Lot 5 in Block 3, George F. Betzold's 2nd Addition to Farmington the house at 500 Spruce St. was built. The Betzolds would go on to live in the home for approximately 30 years, Adlai S. & Susanna M. Duff purchased the home from the Betzolds, when they retired from a farm outside of Farmington. The Duffs would go on to live in the home for 40 years. David W. & Carolyn M, Ardnt purchased the home from the Duffs. The Ardnts would go on to live in the home for almost 9 years. Myron R & Julia L Lysholm purchased the home from the Ardnts. The Lysholms would go on to live in the home for a little over 3 years, Paul H. & Jacki L. Hutter purchased the home from the Lysholms. The Hutters would go on to live in the home for a little over a year. Loren G. & Leiann M. Schulz purchased the home from the Hutters. In the time we have lived here and were attending Faith UMC here in Farmington we met an elderly lady who maiden name was Betzhold and she was married in the house. Unfortunately we failed to get her name or the time of the wedding. However we do know Roger Duff (son of Adlai & Suzanna) pretty well and he gave us several pictures of the house from years past and did provide some history. Betzold's operated the local dairy at one time. The current garage was the upper level hay loft of the barn and the current church grounds to the south, on the other side of the alley was the pasture. While some of the original interior has been remodeled much of it remains. Tall molded baseboard woodwork remains throughout the house as well as what appears to be the original parlor and dining room light fixtures, A unique archway with pillars and built in glass door curio cabinets are between the parlor and the dining room. The dining room also has a built in china cabinet and its own door to the front wrap around porch, A pair of pocket doors remains between the dining room and sitting room but unfortunately we learned a pair of pocket doors that had existed between the parlor and the foyer had been removed when at one time the Duffs had made most of the second floor a rented apartment. The second floor originally was five rooms. A modern bath was installed upstairs into what we believe once was the open upper level of the foyer. The front staircase leads up to entrances to the original three bedrooms and now the bath, The master bedroom has a second door (opposite the front staircase entrance) leading into a nursery which also has a second door that leads to a small stairway landing. From this landing doorways lead back into the nursery, to a small nanny's room, or a closed stairway to the attic, The small stairway there leads down to the back of the house and into the kitchen, The stairway to the basement also has a doorway out to the side yard, giving the house four entrance doors. The kitchen has been remodeled several times. IfI remember Roger Duff correctly, in the 50's linoleum was put over the original hardwood floors and a small bathroom was built just off the kitchen. Several years ago we undertook the upgrading ofthe kitchen from its 1950's condition. We pulled up the linoleum and refmished the old hardwood floor underneath, A tiny abandoned water closet, whose entrance door is from the parlor (and still exists), had its back wall up against a kitchen wall. This wall was removed which then created a cavity which we now use to recess the refrigerator thus opening up more floor space in the kitchen. While new cabinets, countertops, and appliances were installed, the old painted woodwork was either stripped or replaced. The old tall molded baseboards were stripped, stained, varnished and then put back up as new identical woodwork could not be found and would have been expensive to have replicated. The doorway and window casings where not shaped wood so replacing that woodwork with new material to replicate the style that was there (but painted) was simple, and were stained and varnished to match the refinished baseboards. The document you provided, dated October 4th, states that the front wrap around porch has turned balusters. I believe they are just square 2x2s. While we would be honored to have this place called the Schulz House, we believe it would be more fitting to use either the Betzhold or Duff name. In fact many people who have lived in Farmington for all their life have referred to it as the Duff House when talking to us. I can not help but believe that if the Heritage Foundation would like to build a history of the house, that Roger Duff and many other long time residents of Farmington and the surrounding family farms could share many stories of the house. . . . p" .).aT( '....:....& . . . Built in china hutch (remodeled kitchen seen through doorway) passage · dining into sitting room (front door -center 2nd ext. door left) . . . passage - dining into parlor (TV room today) .,.",. sitting room (passage to dining on right) . . . ~:' "~~'::.:; ( : : .:; ':: ',':. :":.:~ :.. :.: : . ,_J ::.:::~.:.:(..) x ~ ~.".':":~ ~;. : :; . H':.~ f ~::'::.~ :..:. :':~:::""':J: C."-~~'~,~:_ ------- - SPRUCEST 500 Spruce Street . . . 500 Spruce Street . . . Sc:. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: ///"..::~2') . V/ Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator ~j../ FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Elm Street Reconstruction Project DATE: December 4, 2006 INTRODUCTION At the November 6, 2006 City Council meeting, the Council accepted the feasibility report and scheduled the public hearing for December 4,2006 for the Elm Street Reconstruction Project. DISCUSSION The proposed improvements include the reconstruction of Elm Street and adjacent City Streets, replacement of the sanitary sewer and water main and the addition of a storm drainage system. The proposed roadway improvements will address the issue that Elm Street is in a deteriorated condition and every year requires extensive patching. The sanitary sewer improvements will bring the sewer system up to City and MN Department of Health standards and reduce inflow and infiltration into the Met Council's interceptor system. The storm water improvements will remove drainage off the City's roads and provide capacity for the entire drainage area. The water main improvements will bring the water system up to City standards for supply, fire flow and hydrant spacmg. A neighborhood meeting was held on Thursday, November 30, at City Hall to convey assessment information to interested residents and receive their comments and concerns regarding the project. Comments from the neighborhood meeting will be forwarded at the Council meeting. BUDGET IMPACT Elm Street (CSAH 50) is a former State Highway turned over to the County by the Minnesota Dept of Transportation (MnDOT). As such, the road (street) improvements will be largely funded by State turnback construction funds. Storm sewer improvements on Elm Street and trunk storm sewer improvements to convey drainage away from Elm Street will also be partially eligible for turnback funding. Elm Street Reconstruction Project Hearing December 4, 2006 Page 2 The City will be largely responsible for funding the sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer improvements on the local side streets as well as the local side streets themselves. Streetscape, lighting and other aesthetic improvements would also be funded largely by the City. The County will participate in the costs for aesthetic improvements in an amount up to 1.5% of the Elm Street construction costs only. The City's funding policies for project costs includes the following: 1. Trunk improvements are funded out of trunk utility funds, 2. Property owners are assessed for a portion of the improvements subject to Minnesota Statute 429, and 3. Bonding for the remaining funding portion paid for out of the general tax levy, utility funds and/or Municipal State Aid Funds. The total project cost is estimated to be $6,074,000. A significant portion of the roadway and storm sewer costs are being funded by the State turn back funds. The City's portion of the total estimated costs is $3,353,500. These City costs include improvements to the side streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main improvements. The City's policies indicate that the City funds 65% of the cost of reconstruction projects and assesses 35% of the project costs to benefiting properties. For this project, consistent with Council policy and practice, 35% of the City's roadway costs and lateral storm sewer costs for the project would be assessed on an area-wide basis. The remaining 65% of these costs would be funded by the City. Water main lateral and sanitary sewer lateral costs would be assessed to those properties that are connected to those services on this project. It is proposed that the assessments for water main and sanitary sewer be capped by the amount assessed for these improvements for the Main Street project. The City would fund the remainder of the non-assessed lateral and trunk water main and trunk sanitary sewer costs. In regards to the special assessments, Statute 429 stipulates that the City cannot assess a property more than the benefit the property receives from the improvements. A benefit consultation (see attached) was performed for the Elm Street Reconstruction Project area which concludes that the area-wide benefit to properties from the improvements would be up to $750 per residential equivalent unit (REV). The land area of the commercial properties in the project area would be converted to REV's and the commercial properties would be assessed for their respective REV's. The proposed, estimated, area-wide assessment per REV for this project is $486 for the Roadway, Streetlights, and Storm Drainage. Including the Streetscape costs in the assessment would increase the area-wide assessment per REV to $603. The assessments for those benefiting from the sanitary sewer and water main reconstruction are proposed to be consistent with the assessments for these improvements levied with the Main Street project. The assessments for properties benefiting from the sanitary sewer and water main reconstruction would be $1,500 for sanitary sewer and $1,500 for sanitary sewer for the properties along Elm Street. Elm Street Reconstruction Project Hearing December 4, 2006 Page 3 The overall funding allocation for the City's portion of the estimated project costs is shown on the following table: City Cost Allocations Roadway Cit, Funded TOTAL ASSESSED STATE ROAD STORM SEWER WATER (35%) AID FUND WATER FUND FUND $741,306 $259,457 $9,034 $472,815 X X X $225,957 $79,085 X $146,872 X X X $438,286 $67,906 X X $370,380 X X $1,143,484 $112,500 X X X $1,030,984 X $804,447 $114,000 X X X X $690,447 Streetscape *Stormwater **Sanitary Sewer **Water Totals $3,353,480 $632,948 $9,034 $619,687 $370,380 $1,030,984 $690,447 * Lateral storm water cost is $194,017. The City assesses lateral only. Trunk costs are $244,268. ** Sanitary Sewer and Water Assessments proposed to be capped at $1,500 each, consistent with the Main Street project assessments. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution ordering the Elm Street Improvement Project and authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the project. The agreement between Dakota County and the City will be brought to the City Council for action at a subsequent meeting. Respectfully submitted, ~~an~ Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file RESOLUTION NO. R -06 ORDERING PROJECT and AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT 06-13, ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 4th day of December 2006 at 7 :00 p.m. Members present: Members absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 6th day of November 2006, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed Elm Street Reconstruction Project (a joint Dakota County and City project); and, WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two ~ublications of the notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 4t day of December, 2006, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota that, 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted the 6th day of November, 2006. The contracts for the improvements will be let within two years of the adoption of this resolution ordering the improvements. 3. Erik G. Peters is hereby designated as the City's engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications in cooperation with Dakota County for the making of such improvement. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 4th day of December 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of December, 2006. City Administrator SEAL Sunset Pond Executive Offices. 13967West PreseNe Boulevard.'Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone:. (952) 895- 1205 Fax: (952) 895-1521 , , This consultation has been made inconformity withacceptedproressional, ethical and, performance standards of real, ~stateappraisaI practice. ,," TheflContingentandLimiting Conditions" section of this reportsliould be thoroughly reaaandungerstood before relying on any information'or al1alysis presented herein: ," . ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION Areawide Assessment Calculations Roadway: ADD Street Lights: Storm Drainage: SUBTRACT Trunk Costs: 35% Assessed Cost per REU $584,l44 $157,163 $741,307 $259,457 $385 $438,286 $244,268 $194,Ol8 $67,906 $lOl Subtotal of Areawide Roadway, Street Lights and Storm Drainage I $486 Streetscape: SUBTRACT Street Lights: . . $383,119 $157,163 $225,957 $79,085 $117 Subtotal of Areawide Assessment including Streetscape I $603 ~. ,~~ ~ ~. ., ro;-~. r1.. ";;~ !e~~f.-_~ .~~ .~ ,.l!! ~. 12. ~~ I h ~. I . ~ ~ . ~... . ,i g~ ~~~ .~ I~. ~~ ~~ ~. i'l .. - :I.S'HJ:L- ~ ~ ~~=!I :;r;iii Of'::! __~ iii 7a~:;r 2~.. r ('t-- ~.o~ .. x f'-L:. lID. ~,,:o . _.~ ~__ f,~; .;.... ~ .... . :! .;; _~ ;; . ~_ --.~-~. !,~ Ii. .1 Ie" Fi= I. ~! If I..-!~~_~ll l · ~ ~_-I.I. ~ .i ~n ~~ ~ ~~ ~ .!..L!ii .! ~L5 ~i_ ?iT .ii . ~ · ~:; ti ~~~ · iii ~. ..~~ '~.. ,. 1:!~r.1 r'~ I I ~.. -,,4! :! lEi,...- f.---~~ ~ .. .i;,. irl ~~u ;..:; u.~ ~. .~<< "eiu .~ ~I. "'. ~ l! -. os !~. ~ . el .!..~ ~~. ll~_ '.. ~~ .ll ll. .ll li~)~ II !~ '--- :I.S'HJ:S 1ft. D ~l:! 5. ~. .i'l~ ~~~ .5ri~~ ~~~~I ~ .. ll.. lli . i . ~ ~__ ~~l . l:! I-~. 1:'.1 . :! . -=- .. ~ ~ 1\ i ~.m. .~~ .l:!~.~. .. e:! ~'~~. . "-es III ~ 53 · \~. ~ . ~. .s~ · .i~!.- s. Se" "'l~'" · ... k_ 1:\ /\,\ S. ~ :! .~ IT . .~~. Si...... .ij....~ _.~ I;J;J;J;J . 'll ~~ ~,. '2:_. . . jij ". '" "... :'!. UI .. . ~ ~ _ I I uu_ ~ ~ ii.':!! ~. ll: ". i linii.:fi ~ ~J:S'H:.U' i cli '--J . 10. )l:-J..._ ~- ~ ~:r1!~ ~'=I=I = I .li- 0 ~~ ~~ @ I :i'-.~ ~ ~. =_ .. Ie~ ~~;;; · ~.. . ~. i-='-- ..._"'_ .._"'_ ((( "" .. Sit ;;;. I j; . .Ii .;;; .>1" . . ~;;;.;;; . ~ ....IT! ~. ~~... fj~~... L. .. '}C ., · --, · Itt:~ . . ~. ~~.~ :e~~. rii~-;;;'=f=f=ri~ ~l:!~ ~a ~ ~ . -~!; z - t"~ .. .... '7W .. .r:.. .li. is. ."i _____ _____ · _ a: l! ~~ ",. ~ :s~~t ~ ~l~Ja~ ~:ii! oOc ! ~ a ~ I ~~~.v~ .~ ."!~~~.~:---. k~iS2~ -~ r.p T 8'OHZ ~~~J ~li~ ~ Iii . ~~ · I I . -'-- ~W! ...-8M i'l. I lh ---- ~ i '= If.l.li ~~ ~ "". a. - ~ .- ___ ~ ~~ gJJ)} ~ . ~ ... l!.:i.~ ~ ~ V- ~ .E..... ~. -.8 --=::::~. /_~ i----=-P- 2:~- -.- .~..!! . :! . -=--=- ~ . ~ .:;. . f.--- ---- ~ l~"'" . l! - l! . · ~ . :I:1'S-.lS~ ~!_I- ~~-J1 . . ~:~ f:~'" l! ~. t~: .11.. ~[JI .~,. - lh .:!l,. · · · .::i ...... ~ .:.I -.. "'- =. w .:!,. ~-~ I~~... I ~nlSlrl . +-' (J .~ ca o Q) ~ ~ Qia..<( Q)C+-' ~ 0 C +-' 0- Q) C/)'OE E 2 U> _ +-' U> WU>Q) C U> o U> ~<( a::: ..; :g~ o 0 '" . . ~ 000 ~ ~ .88 E l! ~ ~ ~~ '2" -1; {j~ g.~ ::<i\: "C ~ ... ~ Q) "C "C 0 ~ Q) "C E E ... t:: C ~ ... ... ~ ~ 0 .9 Q) Q) CI) c - 0 0 ~ en en (1) ~ ... ... ... ... Q) E Q) Q) ~ Q) Q) Q) -I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en - - Q) Q) en en en en en (1) en . . . . ... ... en <( z -<Oiiiiii( I · , .1 · \ ~. ' .J. ~. .1 'II .~ ".I.l! ;. .... -~ . ... ~. .... .31 000. i .. ;. ,:Jy'OH3ddIH5==--l I &TH<SJ . 0 ~~ ~ · l!!. .. ~i! ~ ~~. k. .ll ~. .8 .. .. 5. ~. -tl -..- :!. .:; ~.., r..-~ .~ I-.L ie~ .:: -~- ~. ~ -;l;iii ;;. ~ . e :;.. !i!e -.~ l!. .~~ .~ :;. . . . . i e-!!lli -. z ~~ z ~.. :;j .ll JL. o ~ ~. I ;. .! a. !i!. -I ~ .. . il .... li. ~. .~ . li F- . .1Il ~~lr ;~ ~ i ~ .;;; .l!l 1;. .11 1;. .::1 .11 .::1 :!. :!. =. .:! .:! .:! ::. l!. ::. ~IIT .11 I~I~ II. .::1 .~ =. II. .:! I.il mi ... UI 5 · ~ :! ~L-- .= ::. I \ ITIJ [ill IIIIIIJ I 3l u. o o to o to ('oj o ( I H /0 Q..., City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter J. Herlofsky, Jr. City Administrator SUBJECT: WiFi Service DATE: December 4, 2006 INTRODUCTION/DISCUSSION Representatives from Frontier Communications have been in contact with my office over the past few months. The purpose for the discussion is to provide WiFi service to Farmington residents. The initial proposal received by my office showed some very definite items that were contrary to the long term interest of the City. One of the issues was the exclusivity of the requirement of the Frontier Communications WiFi network and a number of other unanswered questions. Since that original request, an updated contract has been provided which addresses some of the issues, but there is still a need for further discussion. Mr. Charles Bruns would like to make a general presentation at the December 4,2006 Council meeting, to familiarize the Council with the general provisions of the Frontier proposal. City Attorney J amnik and I are reviewing further items with the possibility of bringing something to the Council before the end of the year. If Councilmembers have any concerns, please give me a call. ACTION REQUESTED For your information. ~.' /sp.-..~ct.fu;E-. SUb~~'tted', / ....1. \' I 1/1 / '0}J '1~/ / ~ff~/ Peter 1. Herlo.fskY, Jr. ;1 c) City Adminisyator {/ ( cc: Joel Jamnik CMuller/Herlofsky/Council Memos/WiFi Service ~ w @ ...J ~- O)al --t= 0 s~ ~ ~ .- .... ~ o Q) >< W en en Q) - Q) ... .- ~ ... Q) .- .... c o ... LL ~ .0 "C Q) .... c: Q) en Q) ... a. (0 .... o en Q) c c .- :2E c oeo .... 0 tnO C ._ N E ... ... Q) (0.0 LL E '+- Q) o 0 ~Q) :::c (.)~ "0 C co co +:i C Q) "0 'w Q) "- o - -c 2 :0 :.c e 0. > ~ tl ~ ctl c: .Q ~ € tl V ~ "0 C ell 0: C '> 0. 8 "0 c: ctl "0 Q) C Q) (/) ~ 0. ,!Q Ul ~ .~ Q) Ul Ul C o :.;::; .~ C :J E Ul E- O~ () "- co g>E .- "- :Q :J > 0 e c c.. ,- c ~ .- Q) "- E Q) 0 "0_ co Ul Q) ::::l Q) () .c Ul _ Ul Q) Q) .0 .!: o Ul t-.5 E o .J:: S: .9 > t:: ctl 0. Q) :5 '- .E > '"E o "0 Q) "0 C 2 ,5: ,!Q o .... "C Q) .... c: Q) en e a. c o "w Ul ~ c Q) E :::l U o "0 (/) :.c f- C .Q ro E .E ,5: ,!:!! C Q) ;g c: Vl 8 z '- o .Q i= "0 :::> c: .....I ctl ~ ~ j Q.)~5 .+=O~ ~ ~ u '(ij S ~! ~8j (/) :.c f- @ "- :J o 00 00 Q) ~ Q) ~ · ,...-4 ~ Q) ~ · ,...-4 1 · ,...-4 u ~ o ~ OJ) ~ · ,...-4 s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) · ,...-4 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ · ,...-4 ~ 00 ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ o .~ ~ .~ ""0 ""0 cd ~ cd 00 cd 00 ~ U .g o ~ ~ 00 00 00 Q) Q) U ~ .~ ~ e: .~ Q) S$oo ~ Q) U.s ~~ ~ Q) cd.~ ~S$ O~ ~ 0 Q) ~ Q) .~ ~ ~ .S ""000 ~ ~ ~ ~ o Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) U .~ ~ Q) ~,..!::l O~ ~ 0 ~~ . 00 00 O~ ~ Q) ~ oo.~ ~S$ U U bIJ ~ .s bIJU ~~ ..0 ~ oo~ Q) 0 &Q) Q) 00 ~ 0 .~ ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ ..;::: Q) ~,..!::l O~ ~ ~ ~~ r- oo 00 .~ Q) ~ .~ ~ ~ .~ ~:-;::: .~ U ~ cd S~ 0] U ~ U ~ 00 ~o1:5 .~ B 0 f"\o ~.~ ~ Q)UOO ~Q)~ o S U ~ 0 U ~OO~ . \0 o o N cd ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ Q) 8 ~ o ~ Q) > Q) Q ~""O o ~ ~ cd ~ ~ Q) ~ z& .~ Q) ~ > ~ 0 ]~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ Q) ~ 8 ~ .~ .~ 8 1:5 8 o 0 ~u . bIJ ~ .~ Q) .,.n ~ Q) o U ,..!::l ~ .~ ~ bIJ 8 d ~ 0 5 .~ ro 5 c;: cd ~ U ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ Q) ~ . ~ ~ ,..!::l. ~ ~.~ ~""O ~ r- Q) r--r- ~ 0 8 o ~ .~ d o.~ U.8 N~ Q)~ ~~~ gfQ) ~ Q) .~ 8 ~ ~ ~ r- Q) ~ 0 ~fV\, ""0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ bn~ g 0 .s.~ U 00 8 00 o ~ @ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ .~ Q) ~ ~ ~.~ o.~ ~ ~ > .~ ~ ~~ ~~ 0 Q) ~ .~ ~ ~ d Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ..;::: ~ ~ Q) o~ S~z ~o d~Q) ~~ ~ ~""O \JJ 0 o.~ Q~ U~ ~ Q):: Q)>~ ~ 15 ~ Q).~ ~~~QU . . "0 C co co :;::; c Q) :g CJl Q) I- o ..... N "C .sa :.a :E e 0. ~ t5 ";:: t) Q) Co c o ~ ..0 ';:: t) '5 ~ CJl Q) t) '~ -g Q) ro CJl 0: en . $. c 0. o 8 :;::; co "C t) 1ij c ~ ::J C E CJl Q) E Q) ~ o ~ 0. t) Co "~ g> E E :.c:J 0 ";:;:: 0 j e O~ .9 a. CJl ~ .~ Q; ~ I- E Q) Q) 0 :5 "0..... co CJl .E Q) a > Q) en g ..c (/) "C ..... Q) Q) Q) C -g .0 Ow Q) O::J E f-.o ,~ c 02 CJl O~ ~ c Q) E => u o "C CJl :E I- I- ::J o c: ,Q ro E ..e .s rn ~ Q) "C 'E Vl 8 z .... Q ~ I- c: ~ co -.J C . 0 co Vl - ~ Vl ,~ 1"'1" Z g ~ 0 5 · r- ~ ,s .,... U El ~ Z B ~ u o ~ ]3 ~~ E o => U g "C CJl :E I- @ en en 0) (.) u <3: en en CD - 0) '- -- s 0) c -- '- ~ o - - 0) - -- ..c o ~ '- 0) -- +-' C o '- LL (J) 0) >. ....... s.... ro~ ..c: (J) ~ ~ 0)"0 C 0) a3 "0 0) ro E ro ro ..c: NC> C(J)O) COO) ~ :;::; ro:;::; 0) u ro (j) ~ g> . u ~ -- ..c .- 0) . 0) C E ::J ::J -- C U o "0 Ci3 (J) 0 ro u 0 C 0) ._ ~ ~ Q.E t 0 a3 .8 (J) ..c: .~ (J) ~ - 0) C ....... ~ C -- ._ "0 "O..c 0 Q..c C Q) ~ N >0 C (J) ~ (J) u ~ ~ 'ro C C (J) s.... ~ ~ -; ~ 10 (J) ....... E 0) .- s.... Q. "0 ._ - - ro ~s....0) (J)c "0 ~ ~ E ~ ~ roo ~ . u 0) ,,, >. '-' ..c': t:: .- 0 C "0 ro....... 0 .- s.... ..c: ..... :> ro ....... -- ro ro ", '0 03.......(J) C ..c :!::: ...J ;:> C ....... s.... '1.1 -- 0) 3: Q.O)O) o~cO)..cO)c~(J) (J) '+- "0 U s.... -- 0) Q. - 0 '-' (J) 0) o '> ':> LL C E ::J == ~ s.... s.... "0 0) C C 0 ~ en::J >. 0) 3:.c LLO ::J O)(J) ~ 0 o s.... '1.1 . .C E 0 ~ 03:!::: ro 'en Q. ~ (J) en E Q........ 0) 3: ~ 'E -9 '3: ~ '> .8 (J) O)c ~ 0 0) 2 ro C ~ Q...c (J) C =0 ~ 0)._ Q) U "0 s.... C 0 .s Q. 0) :.c .8 s.... ", s.... > (J) ~ 0 ro (J) ,.. ::J:>_ ....... O)c ro 0 t:: 0) Q) (J) 0) '+- ~._ _ ;:> ~ 3: .- ~ ....J 0) C ~ ro (1) (J) ~ 0) ._ 0)....... 3: 0 I 0) 'c .(J) C ~ CJ.9 ~ (J) E .- 0) 0) ....... s.... C s.... ::J C tJ) _ U -c ro ..c c ..c: U tJ) -3: ro >. 0 ro c 0 .- --= C LL oro.......-51::= -O)u oOcro roc ~ s.... C (1) "0 Q. 0 U (J).- 0) t:: ....... s.... 0)'- 0 c.. C ~ - <( t5 10 z (J) 0 0)-- 0) > ~ a.. >< ro s.... 0 ro ~ -"-"0 Q. ~ ~ . :c -0) '3: 0) W "0 ~.E ~....... (1) (J) 0) s.... Co (J) > o "0 (J) - C C) ~ ~ ~ :;::; ~ c.. 03 "0 _ 0) E (J) I-- s.... - 0) (j) C ':> c....... B U 0 c C c _ ~ ~ LL == (J).- .;: ;:> _ ", ", >. ~ ", ::J 0 _ ~ I 3: (J) >< - 0)- 1: X 0) ~ u..c s.... -3: -(J) = -0)0) ccro.......w~ 0 s....LL s....::Jo) ~ Z C s.... ns._ s.... 0) ~ C 0 s.... O)..c 10 ~ N . (J) ::Jo i\ >. 0 C C ~ ..... _ 0 '+- ::J :;::; "0 (J) W ::J Woo 0 '+- -- <(.- (1)....... = 0 C 'S; 0 ..c "0 ~ Q. 0) s; I 3: z ~:c ro P ~ "Oc o .. C ~ O)..c;:> Q. 0) ___ ~ W -c 0) o"O'en 0 ..... ',... "0 Q. 0) > LL.$ ro a. (j) ~ x ~ "0 C 0 s: en 5 0 0)"0 I C ~ (1) >- (J) 0) Q) co....... .., C '" ~ .~ ~ C) 0) ....J (.) Z ....... ~ Z ro Q. cEo (1) s....o (J)._ ,..:0 (j) .- -..- C '-' ~ (J) 0 (1):;::; (.) .A" > .: (J) 0 ~ ~ 0) c "0 '..011 0):;::; C) ro 'S; 3: ....... 0 ..... 0)-..- (J) "0 ro c _~ s.... =0 ns ", ~....... . s.... (1) s.... ....... (1) c --....... ns 0) 0) "0 C t:: (1) O)c ~ Q. ~ 0) 0) en .0 ~ ~ -. ro..c ro ns 0) en CD 0) ns.c E - s....'I.I~c_ ~ "0 s.... .......", a; ~ 0 E C) ro == C -= _C ~ C 3: ro :E 0 ~ J: .- ....... 0) .2 E 3: '(J) ..... 0 (1)E ro ro (J) ~....... _C tncCJ)Q.o s....0) cO) 0) 0) >. ~E ::J ~ E C 01 0)._ ~ C 0 U ~ 0) tJ) +:i "0 .- '-' C :;::;:!::: 0 0 ...... - '" C (1) U 0) - E .- 0 J: -- C > " tJ):> w '" _ 0) 0) ~ c U (.)....... 0:;::; U 0) ~ L "0 1:: ns.: Q. tJ)oO)OI-C1)~LLs....~~~CJ~~uen"O(J) wo (J)....... ~ M -0 2 :0 :E o Q ~ 1:5 '<:: Cil ~ CIl c ,Q 'S .0 '<:: Cil '6 ~ "'0 C CO CO :;::; C Q) "'0 'en Q) I- o - CIl Q) () "~ Q) CIl CIl C o :;::; CO () C ::l E CIl Em o~ () Co OlE "~ I- "'0 ::l "S; 0 o c Q. .;;; "~ Q3 I- E Q) 0 "'0 _ "- co CIl .E Q)::l > - () C Q) CIl 0 ..r:::. CIl "0 - Q) Q) Q) C -g ..c"en Q) O::l ~ I-..c ,!Q "0 C CIl a c '> Cl 8 "0 C CIl "0 2 c Q) C/) ~ 0. ,!Q E o ~ .9 > 1:: CIl a Q) .s c o 'en CIl ~ c Q) E ::l U o "0 C/) :E I- I- ::J o . . . . c .Q en E .E ,so ~ C Q) "0 <;:: C V'l 8 Z 0 o :0 i= c ::) CIl -l C: o CIl j:... ~ w Q.) 6 'i · += 5 ,~ 5 ~ I ~81 :E I- @ . . . (/) CD en CO ~ C CO > -c <( E Q) ~ (/) ~ CJ) (/) (/) Q) - Q) '- ~ . C) c 'C Q) > .- Q) o ~ '- o ;: +-' Q) Z en en Q) (.) (.) <( en en Q) Q) '- ~ ca .=. ~ CJ ca CO :i: ... o ! (1) z tJ) tJ) (1) Qi ... "..,."... ....... .... f""""" !...., .... f :" ~ ... i\\ / ...,..... .... ! '........ . ". : 'w' : .. f / \ / .' i/ \..... :........ ...... I."."..""." ". '. . . . ' '. \, :' ....... ' ~.. .. \~." ., ........ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..t., (Joe ~ +-' 'C :::J (.) Q) CJ) o +-' ..c ~ (.) '- CO o e 5: ~ >. &>.~ CD ~ g >.<(~~ 1il >'"0 Cll :!: "0 U g- ,7\ ~ ~ ~ -g ~ ~ CJ)Q) z ~ :c CO" .= :::J \\J Q) '-COC:C"C~~ CD=CllCllCDcI5..:J .~ & ~ ~ ~ '> '> () "> > A LLo.. 0:::> "> "> >. ~ ro - '0. CJ) (1) 0 CJI .~ .ci I (1)- tJ)~ tJ) - tJ) ~ (1) 'C t: c.. .... .- Q) tJ)_ ~ c cow CJ) Q) 'C ~ .0 ::J CJ) Q) ~ o c.. E (1)w CJ >. .- - '=~ (1) ro tJ)C/) u ~.- _.0 .- :::J Un.. CJ) (1) -0 CJ-c .- c '= 0 (1)0 tJ)ui -:=, .~ 0 C~ (1) - "C ~ .- E tJ) 0 &I "<t -0 .Sl :c ~ 0. ~ U 't:: (jj ~ ctl c: ,Q :; J:J 't:: (jj ~ ~ -0 c: ctl c: c: '> 0. S "0 C C1:l C1:l ~ C Q) "0 '00 Q) .... a .... en Q) u .~ Q) en en c a ~ 'c ::J EjB E Q) a-i: u C1:l en E E c..... 0 :O:::l .c 'S; a ~ a c .9 ~a_ > 0. en t:: .~ Q; ~ ..... E ~ Q) a .... "0 t5 .E m:::l > - u <: Q) en 0 .r:; en -0 .... Q) ~ Q) C c: .0 '-en Q) ~ a :::l 1-.0 .!!l c: Q) E ::3 o o -0 tJl :E f- -0 c: ctl -0 Q) c: Q) tJl Q) 5 .!!l c a '00 en ~ ..... ::J o c: .Q rn E .E .!: ~ c: Q) -0 c::: c: en S Z .... o .e - '0 ~ ~ .....I ~ o .l!l · en Q) !:- en 'g ~ Z e o 0. - tJl · r- !c( .!: -fIIIIII ~ ~ "-zs 6 ~ ~ ~~ ~ u .g tJl :E @ . en en .- 0) () () <( en en 0) - 0) '- . ~ 0) ""C .~ +'" -- U "t- o en +'" -- "t- O) C 0) m . Go) > c == co ~ C) C) "'" c c 0 .- 'i: ;: C ft Go) == t/J '6- 0 E g' 1: '0 -:;; III 'E CII :>. 0 l!! 0 "C .c III - a.,W '"'is. t/J CI) Go) VI ft 0::: "'" t/J Go) III "'. fl .. C c: Go) ;::, Go) _ p CJ CJ N ... _ ca Go) :;:: C) 0 .... tJ) '(3 c: ~ Go) ft 'i: "'" C ~ . t:: .9 0 ~ CII 0 'c,. _ :;:; ::l Co 0" <: III OJ Co ~ OJ ._ > > ::l ~ Co "C g ..c: III ~'u lii <: Dl 0 "'i:.c ._. :i: >. -;;; i::l"i ~ Dl -C11 Ul E p <: ;-; 0 - _ 'fi 'i: .., = _ CII .c III CII CII - O..c: _ .. ~o.sSl ;3c~ 6 ~ <: l!! Ul 0 - ..c: :>. - ." - "C - l!! .c :.: "C c 1;; <: 'S; 0 t/J....c C'CSEca:> E CII ';i: III ~.c Ill' III III '" .s.. "C _:>. III III III CII .5 ~.e III ; '2 III ~.... III ~ ;:;::!! > .5 e ::l::l III .:: ""'0 III 0 "'.2 Iii -=.c == E :>. 5"" ~ 'is. la1; '" U ~ UiE '2 .c ~ .:: E II) CI) C) .- ._ t/J co.. w 5 -a.iij==.cCII 00_ "C <: .c CII c:!! ~ l; 0 :g oE lii l!! .. OJ ~ a; ~ 0 E CII 5.~ E III ::l .e Co 1;' ." Z - "C.5 _ 1: 0 1: 0 _'u D.. 8 :: :g lii !!l =<: CII 0 CII m <:'i: )(." rl CII "C.c 0 CII l5 - CII::l "'--0.. .__ .::: 'I::f E E .. .... OJ ::. 0 x "C III = a. III CII Co III - '" lJ III ._ <: ::l 0 <: l!! Dl 0 '0 III '" c ~ .. _ III 'i3 _ ._ ~ III CII <:..c: E '6 w ~ al .; .5 fl E CII lii > 0 0 .- = .. .. CII CII _._ III cECIl :;:; ::l E " g' 0 Co 'i: III ~ Ll. C "C III III Iii lD .- > III III == CII CII .- III 0 N III D.. "'." > .. Dl III ..c: S t/J '-E ;: CII III .5 m ~ -s.,g '6 CII _ . CII III - III III " 0:: ;-;.- .. _ CII == .. 0 0 ::l III " ." ~ .., ..c: III t::.c 0 III "C "'" C "C Go) ,: CI) CI) Go) Go).... 0 ca c '_> <: 0 0 CII 0 .. .<: ~ > "C <: "C III III III 0 0 e " lJ :; 0 ._ CII Co"O J:"C III CII <: Co lD Ul .. > "C Co :t: <: <: 0: C111!:>. . CoE ~.a~cawco ~ 0 .~ <: == . . D.. III .... CJ "'" W (.) <ccae .... Go) c "'" (1) .... c .... t/J o CJ ~ . . . . . . . c: o :;::l co E .9 ,!: ~ 'E Q) "C <;:: c: VI 8 z ... Q ~ ~ ffi ....I ~ o s · VI Q) !:- VI 'g QJ z ~ o 0 - tfl · r- lei: ,!: .,..... ~ -E ~ Z 8 S ~ 5j ~8! tQ; In "C 2 :0 ~ o > 13 .C fii ~ co c: .Q :; .c .C fii ~ ~ "C c: co 0- c: .> o 8 "0 C rn rn :;::::; c Q) "0 'w ~ o - lIJ Q) (.) .~ Q) lIJ lIJ C o :;::::; rn (.) .c ~ E lIJ E"Q) O-c (.) rn OlE c .... :.c~ os; 0 o c .... .- c..lIJ c .... .- Q) .... E Q) 0 "0_ rn lIJ Q) ~ -(.) Q) lIJ ..c lIJ - Q) Q) C .0 0 W o ~ 1-.0 "C c: co "C Q) C Q) tfl Q) a ,!!l E o j .9 ~ co o Q) :; .E > c o "C Q) "C c: 2 .!: .!!l 'E Q) E ::> u o "C tfl :E I- c o 'w lIJ ~ .... ~ o . en c: o . -- ...... CO U -- - a. a. <( - co a. -- u -- c: :J ~ . . . > I- W LL <C en u - ...J al =>> 0.. ... tn ... c: .t: ui e-E== (I) (I) E ~1i) E .- ~ 0 'to- tn (.) uro o 0.. ~ "'0 ~ ~ U :> c."'C .!!l ~ (I) C'O (I)"'C c: .~ 0 ~ E ~... (.) ~ (I) 0 (.) c: - C'O O.c: c.... E ~ o.s ~ tn ~ 'to- C'O o tn 'to- ... tn (I) .c (I) tn o . (.) C'O -= tn (.).c ..::; C'O <C C'O I e I 10 (I) C'O (I)"'C (.) (.) -- .- - - o 0 0.. 0.. (I) E .t: (.) "'C c: C'O (.) !E C'O ~ ... ~ C'O (I) .c: c: "'C (I) (.) C'O - C. tn C'O ~ (I) E C'O (.) E o ~ 'to- tn "'C (I) .! o (I) "'C .- > (I) > .- - (I) ... C'O ... tn "'C c: C'O - C'O (.) o E o ~ 'to- tn "'C ~ o (.) e (I) .c: ... o ... "'C (I) ~ (I) > .- - (I) "'C (I) .c c: C'O (.) tn (I) E .t: (.) E .t: (.) 'to- o tn o ... o .c: . c.l!! (I) (I) E .~ .- ~ ... '- - (.) C'O (I) (I) (.) ~ .- - I 0 (I) C. (.) .- - o 0.. o ... C) c: .- - (I) > C'O ~ ... (I) - .- .c: 3: C'O e C'O (I) .c: ... c: "'C e o ... tn tn - C'O 'i: (I) ... C'O E tn ~ o "'C ~ C'O N C'O .c: 'to- o (I) tn . C'O (I) .c ~ C'O't: 10 C'O "'C'to- o 0 ... (I) tn c: tn tn (I) tn (I) (.) (I) (.) tn (.) (.) (I) (.) <C .c: <C I'" I (I) (I) ~ ~ LL (I) .c: ... c: . tn (.) ... :t:i tn (.) .- C'O tn ... tn C'O o ... C) c: .- ... .c: C) 't: e 't: - C'O ... .- C. tn o .c: C) c: .S; .- (I) (.) (I) ~ c: C'O - C. o ... tn ... .- E 0 '- ... (I) c: .e- .2 tn == C) c: .- 3: C'O ~ "'C C) c: .- "'C - .- ~ .c 'to- o (I) tn C'O .c C'O ... C'O "'C o ... "'C c: o (.) "'C c: . C'Oe tn (I) s,E .- ... tn C'O - (I) C'Ol:: ... .- ~ > ~ tn 0 ...... C:.! (I) ~ :t:i.c C'O E c.C'O ... .- 'to- E 0 tn (I) c: tn C'O ~ ~ ~ I- 0 I (.) en :E LL W "'0 C ctl ctl :;::; c Q) "'0 'in Q) .... o - ..0 -ci 2 :0 :c e Q ~ 1:3 'C: C;; Q) Co c: .Q '5 .c 'C: C;; ~ ~ '0 c: co 0: c: ':;:' Q 8 III Q) u .~ Q) III III C o :;::; ctl .2 c :::l E III E1i) o..lo:: u Co OlE .!:.... E "'O:::l 0 'S; 0 ~ e.!: .Q 0.. III ~ .!: Q) ~ .... E Q) Q) 0 =:; "'0_ ctl III .E Q) a > Q) III ~ ~ III '0 - Q) Q) Q) C -g .D'in Q) O:::l :s I-.D .!!l '0 c: co '0 Q) 'E Q) CIl ~ Q ,!!l 'E Q) E :::l t.l o '0 CIl :c: l- e: o :.;::l co E .E .S ]j 'E Q) '0 0::: c: VI 8 z ..... o ~ i= -g :J co ...J ~ . 0 s j:.. ~ .~ 0) ~ ~ ~ 8 j S ~! ~8~ :c ~ c o 'in .!Q ~ .... :::l o . en c o . -- ....., co () -- - a. a. <( - co a. -- () .- C :J ~ . en ~ tt: o ~ u - ...J OJ ::J D.. o ..... C) c: .- c: "- :J . ..... "c (1) - "- (1) ..... 't: :J (1) o .c: ; en..... . .- 1:: c: - 3: 0 .; i "cQ.:=ii: 'Q)C1).c: ._ "- ~ (1) .... (1) :> .c: (1)..... U) ..... .c:.~ ~ ..... 3: c: .- "- ~ 0 "- U) o (1) 3:i;: O"C "C ns o 0 ..... - ~c: ..... 3: :: 0 :E"C ca 0 ::: "- ..... .- .- ~ (1) ca ;"c (1) ns U) U) ca (1) e E (.) .- c::: I e U) (1) "- > o (1) 1:) U) (1) (1) Q. .~ U)= .E 0 C)C1) c:.c: . - ..... "C - .- :J OJ E "- (1) Q. "C c: ns U) C) c: .- 3: ns "- "C :J .Q- I .- U) ns U) U) (1) (.) (.) <( I U) "- o ..... (.) (1) Q. U) c: - C) c: .- "C - .- :J OJ c: .- U) (1) "C o (.) C) c: .- c: o N "C c: ca C) c: .- "C (1) C) ca 3: (1) U) "C c: ca .. U) "- (1) 3: o ..... "- (1) ..... ns 3: .. U) - - (1) 3: .. U) (1) Q. .- C. "- (1) ..... ca 3: :J "- .Q 0 ..... U) .- U) (1) (.) (.) <( I U) "- o ..... (.) (1) Q. U) c: c: o E ~ - (1) ..... o E (1) . tt: U) IS .ns ..... ..... c.== C) c: .- "C - .- :J OJ (1).- c ~ "-.... (1) ..... ns ~ l , , ~ l -~1I"~ I~ \, II "'0 C co co :;:; c Q) "'0 Ow Q) .... o ....... " -0 .2: :c :2 e a > 13 .;:: u; ~ co c: oQ 'S € u; :c ~ '0 c: co c: c: os; a 8 C/l Q) () .~ Q) C/l C/l C o :;:; CO o~ C ::J E C/l Em o~ () Co ~E 0_.... E "'O::J 0 0> 0 } e o~ .9 c.. C/l ~ o~ (j:; ~ .... E Q) Q) 0 :; "'0....... ..... co C/l .E Q) ~ > Q) C/l g .r::. C/l '0 ....... Q) Q) ~ o~ -g o ~ ~ I-..c .!!l '0 c: co '0 Q) C Q) (/) Q) a ,!!l c Q) E => o o '0 (/) :2 l- e:: o :;::l co E .E ,EO Cii ~ Q) '0 -= c: VI 8 z ..... o .e i= -g ::l co ...I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ 3'~ sH ~8j :2 ~ - c o Ow C/l ~ .... ::J o en c o -- +-' co U -- - 0. 0. <( ...... ro s.... .s=. 0 ...... (])> (j)~ o (]) ~.o s.... ro o t) ~ E E e (])"+- ...... (j) (j) (]) >-t) (j) -- ro C C (]) o (j) :;:; (]) ro C t)_ :J (]) "'C s.... (]) 3: o 0 ............ (j) en (j) (j) (]) (]) t) t) t) t) ro ro O)(]) .~ > "'C ro ':> .s=. O......(j)s.... s....os....S a.. C (]) 0"'C~ C "'C 6 8- o s.... s.... (j) (j) 0 a....... :J "'C (]) 0 -s.... .s=. g 0 .t) (j) -~C(]) -ro(])"'C ro ...... (j) .- - 0 > .- s.... 0 .. O)c (]) s.... COC.s=.a.. OA~oA .- ..... ca (.) :] "C W (]) s.... (]) .s=. a. (j) o E - ro +.,. .s=. 0) 'C (]) .s=. ...... c - s.... (]) .s=. ...... ro 0) o ...... co 0. -- U -- C :J ~ (j) ...... c (]) "'C :J ...... (j) '- Q) ..c +-' o ~ s.... o 3: ...... (]) c t) tt= ro s.... - -. ~ LL (f) ~ UJ Q) C) o 0.. --- o (j) - ...... c c o (]) (]) E "'C1:: > ro a. (])(])O) ......"'Cc o E ro c (]) s.... C s.... (]) :J "'C s.... "+- ...... O~.s=. 5 "'C _ 0) .- C -l eoro"'C s.... - (]) O)rol"V' (]) a. u.. ...... .- C .~ -g :J :J ro s....E"'C .c (]) -"+- O)O(]) C 0.. .- C C/) s.... 0 o .- "+- ......-0 .- t) C(])O) o C C E C s.... t) 0 0 .- t) ~ tt:: s.... C ro 2 0 .=c~ (jAAA fE ca s- t- A (j) 1:: (]) ro >- t) C (]) C 0)0 s.... -- (])eo E .t) (j)(])"'C (]) s.... C -S ro (j) "'C (j) :J 0.. ro en (j) :J Q:5 ...... (j) cnE>< >- Q)ro~ ro ~t)_ O)C ro 0 (j) C ro .s=. (]) ~ .- ro t) "'C (j) 0) t) (]) '> .0 ~ :;:; :J.c~(j)(j) "'C~c(])eo (])3:oE- .s=. ......._ (j) t) ---...... "'C s.... (j)~rocJ2 -:sEro O)t)o(j)"'C . ~ (]) "+- t (]) ~(j)C(])s.... t) - _ :J ro "'C a. ro C. s.... (]) 0 E ro -(j)- t) 2~C/)2ro :Js....(j)(j)_ ot):J>-ro ~CenC/)o .....AAAAA .- en C ca s- t- A c o ~ E .9 ,~ ro ~ (],) '0 <+= c Vl 8 z (; o =0 i= c ~ C\l ...J ~ o C\l ,. ~ Q) as 5 '~ · += 3 .~ 6 ~ ~ ~~q :.c I- @ 00 '0 .l!l :0 :.c o 0. > 1j ';:: 1ii ~ C\l c o ~ .0 ';:: 1ii ~ ~ '0 C C\l a c 's;. 0. 8 '0 C C\l '0 (],) 'E (],) CIl (],) 0. ,!Q "0 C C'Cl C'Cl :;:::::; C Q) ~ en Q) '- o ...... en Q) () .~ Q) en en c o :;:::::; C'Cl () 'E :::l E en Em o~ () Co OlE .~ '- "0 :::l '> 0 o c '- .- 0.. en c '- .- Q) '- E Q) 0 "0_ C'Cl en Q) ::l - () Q) en ~ en - Q) Q) C .0 .- en o :::l 1-.0 E o ..c: :;: ,g ~ Co 0. (],) :5 '- .9 > c o '0 (],) '0 C (],) ~ ,!Q 'E (],) E ::l U o '0 CIl :.c I- c o '00 en ~ '- :::l o 0' -0 2 :0 :c "0 e c c. CO Z CO t5 ';:: :;:; Cii c t Q) CD "0 ro C) 'en c: 0 0 b1) Q) - '- ::::J ~ 0 € cd - Cii ~ III ~ 00 Q) () ~ ;::::$ ~ .~ '"0 ~ c: r./J Q) co III 0 c: E ~ III ';:;' 0 b1) ~ c c. ~ 0 8 ~ ~ C) C) :;:; '"0 rfl c\S 00 co c: () co ~ .~ ~ ~ S .c '"0 a rJ:l ~ :J CD C) E III C 0 C) CD Z C) ECi) en CD C) ~ Q C) o~ Ci ~ () Co .(!l (l) ~ C) cd ~ cnE ,- 0 "'C .~ > ~ 0 b1) ,~ '- E 0 ~ C) b1) 0 "0 :J .c ~ E 0 C'l < "S;: 0 ~ ~ ~ 00 o c .9 ~ U '- .- C) C) ~ Cl..1Il .?: ~ C) ~ 00 c '- ro C) ~ "- Q) c. ~ S ~ ~ cd '- E CD ~ ~ -- ~ Q) 0 E b1) .~ "0_ .2 (l) .~ 0 ~ "'C CO III (l) C) b1) ~ .~ Q) :J > 8 ~ - () c C) .~ C) Q) III 0 ~ ~ .~ ~ .~ .c III '"0 ~ ~ ~ ...... Q) CD ~ '"0 ~ C) I Q) C c: (l) ~ b1) .0 "- CD U ~ III E ~ .~ o :J (l) ~ < 00 ;::::$ ~ "'C ~ ~.o .(!l C) 0 C) c ~ ;::::$ cd "'C C) CD ~ a ~ b1) U E OJ) 0 ~ ~ ~ C ::::J () C) C) ~ 0 0 ~ "en '"0 < ~ C) -- ~ z C) III en .~ -- 00 :2: :c ~ & 0 a s I- ,.....-l 00 00 '- c: C) C) ~ C) :J .Q ~ ,.....-l ~ s 0 ro ~ 0 .~ ~ ~ ~ E (l) ~ cd C) 0 .2 ~ .~ 0 ,!: -~ ~ ~ r./J 00 Q u 0 ~ ~ ..... ;::::$ ~ u c ~ a CD ~ C) '"0 \0 C) C) ~ ~ 00 "- > c: C) 00 Vl 8 0 "'C .~ e Z ~ 0 .~ ~ -- .~ ~ ~ o .f? ~ 00 cd ~ ~ E ~ - '"0 cd 0 I- c: 0 ;::::$ ~ ::::> co ~ 0 .~ ~ C) .~ -l C: ~ U ~ 0 . 0 co N ~ ~ 00 .- Vl- U ~ l=- ,91 ~ 00 Vl ~ ~ c. >< 0 Q.)zo ~ C) ~ ~ ;::::$ Q Ci ~ C) ~ "'C ~ C) u -+: ~ ,s .~ cd ~ U .l!l .~ ~ 00 - c: ~ ~ u 00 00 ~ Z 8 a ~ C) .~ o ~ ~ 0 0 C) .~ z 0 Q ~ ~~ E ~ o ::::J Z U ~ u g '"0 ,(!l . .c . . l- . @ . . . . (J) E !.... 0) I- +-' C 0) E 0) 0) !.... 0) <( ~ ro S en C. CD ...... en ...... >< CD Z '+- o +-' ~ 0) a:: c o ::t:: ro +-' (/') ~ +-' o "'0 C ro ~ 0) c !.... o +-' +-' <( ~ +-' o ~ +-' .~ ~ !.... o S A 0) "'0 > o !.... Q. o . +-' (J) +-' -.- (J)'+- -0) !.... C 0) 0) ..cco E~ Q) !.... ~ ~ - +-' U Q) cz :J (J) o (J) (0) ~- +-' 0) . - !.... o .- ~S c (J) <( ~ ~ U :!:::: (J) ~O +-' 0)"'0 0) C ~ ro o ~ +-' 0 0):;:; ...a ro ro c ro ro Q. > x <(w Ec ro 0) 0) E I- Q) !.... Q) 0) !.... +-' 0) c<( o !.... LL A ro > o !.... Q. c.. <( !.... o '+- ..c ...... co ~ !.... Q) ..c E 0) U 0) o c o c o ro E .E .!: ]j C Ql '0 <;::: C II) 8 Z 0 o ::a i= c ~ co ...J ~ o co ~ ~ I QJ 5 ~ .~ ~ I S ~ ~ ~8~ :E f- @ - 'u C :J o o ~ +-' o o +-' +-' C 0) (J) 0) !.... 0.. A '0 C eo eo :;::; c Q) '0 "Ci) Q) ... o - o '0 2 :0 :E e a > t5 .;:: t) ~ co c o :s .0 .;:: t) ~ ~ '0 C co a c .;:;. a o u '0 C co '0 Ql C Ql en ~ a ,!Q III Q) U "~ Q) III III C o :;::; eo u 'c ::l E III Ea> o~ u Co OlE ,~ ... '0 ::l 'S; 0 o c ... "- 0.. III C ... .- Q) ... E Q) 0 '0_ eo III Q) ::l - U Q) III .r:. III - Q) Q) C .n "- III o ::l I-.n E o .<:: :;= .9 ~ ro a Ql ;:; ~ .E > '"E o '0 Ql '0 C Ql E .!Q C Ql E :::l U o '0 en :E f- c o "Ci) III ~ ... ::l o lOb City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrato@ Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: RE: Equipment Shared Use Agreement DATE: December 4,2006 BACKGROUND Previously the City's Parks and Recreation Department and Farmington School District's Buildings and Grounds Department have shared certain maintenance equipment when needed. In the past year, it was determined by the City Attorney and the League of Minnesota City's Insurance Trust that there should be a written agreement in place before any of the City's maintenance equipment is used by other public entities. DISCUSSION Staff members from the City's Parks and Recreation Department and the Farmington School District's Buildings and Grounds Department have created an Equipment Shared Use Agreement (Agreement) that identifies the condition upon which certain identified maintenance equipment may be shared between the two departments. Exhibit A represents a list of the maintenance equipment that may be shared on an as needed basis. Exhibit B is the Maintenance Equipment Lending and Borrowing Form that will be used to track and account for maintenance equipment that is borrowed between the Parks and Recreation Department and Buildings and Grounds Department. The Agreement has been reviewed by the Farmington School District's School Board and was formally approved at its November 27,2006 meeting. REQUESTED ACTION Approve by motion the Equipment Shared Use Agreement with ISD # 196. ~~7;:ii) Randy Distad Parks and Recreation Director cc: Don Hayes Doug Bonar EQUIPMENT SHARED USE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this _ day of , 2006, by and between the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the '"City") and Farmington lndependent School District #l92 (the "School District") (collectively referred to as the "Parties"). Lending Party refers to the equipment owner and borrowing Party refers to the Party using the maintenance equipment. WHEREAS, there has been a history of the City's Parks and Recreation Department and the School District's Building and Grounds Department sharing maintenance equipment in certain situations; and, WHEREAS, there was not any formal written Agreement previously in place to address the use of the Parties maintenance equipment; and, WHEREAS, the City Attorney and the City's insurance carrier have identified that allowing the City's maintenance equipment to be used by others without a written agreement in place poses a risk to the City; and, WHEREAS, the Parties own and maintain certain maintenance equipment, which is shown in Exhibit A and may benefit both Parties in their operations; and, WHEREAS, the Parties are interested in continuing to share the use of certain maintenance equipment; and, WHEREAS, it appears to be in the best interest of the Parties to approve this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein, the Parties hereby agree to the following: SECTION 1. TERMS OF AGREEMENT. l. The Parties will continue to retain ownership and properly maintain their own maintenance equipment. 2. This Agreement shall be in effect once the proper signatures have been secured and shall not have a termination date unless either Party wishes to terminate this Agreement as identified in Section #3. 3. The Agreement shall be reviewed annually at a meeting by the Parties in December. Any revisions to the Agreement that are determined at this meeting will be approved formally by both Parties. 4. The terms of this Agreement do not bind the Parties for the shared use of other equipment. f'ag(' f oj5 5. The Agreement may be amended at any time in order to add or delete maintenance equipment from the approved list as identified in Exhibit A. 6. Priority for the use of the maintenance equipment that is identified in Exhibit A will be given to the Party that owns it. 7. The Parties agree to use each other's maintenance equipment in the proper manner and avoid any negligence, accidents or improper operation of the maintenance equipment. The Parties agree that appropriate personnel from each organization shall sign off on the delivery and return of the equipment ensuring that it is in good and operating condition. Should any damage occur due to negligence while the borrowing Party is using the maintenance equipment and the damage requires repair, it shall be the responsibility of the borrowing Party to make payment for the repair of the maintenance equipment in order to restore it to good and operating condition. Both Parties understand that the borrowing Party is not responsible for normal "wear and tear" on the equipment. 8. No compensation shall occur between the Parties for the use of each other's maintenance equipment. The Parties agree that any maintenance equipment using fuel will be returned with the same level of fuel that the maintenance equipment had when the lending Party provided it to the borrowing Party. 9. The Parties agree that if the maintenance equipment is used for a single day, then it will be returned prior to the end of the same workday to the lending Party that owns the equipment. The Parties further agree that if the maintenance equipment is used on consecutive days it does not have to be returned until the use has ended. In this situation the borrowing Party will store the maintenance equipment overnight in its own building. lO. Should an emergency situation occur for the lending Party and the maintenance equipment is needed to assist with the emergency situation, then the borrowing Party shall return it immediately to the lending Party. 11. The Parties agree to provide training to each other on the safe operation of the maintenance equipment that is being borrowed prior to it being used. l2. The Parties agree that only staff trained to operate the borrowed maintenance equipment shall operate it. 13. The Parties agree that the borrowing Party shall be responsible for transporting the maintenance equipment to and from the work site unless other arrangements are made. l4. The Parties agree that should any maintenance equipment be lost, stolen or damaged beyond repair during the time that the maintenance equipment is in the possession of the borrowing Party then the borrowing Party shall pay to the lending Party the full replacement cost of the maintenance equipment. Page:; 0/5 SECTION 2. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. l. The Parties shall provide to each other written proof of insurance protection in such amounts, and from such issuing companies, as shall fully and completely protect the interests of the Parties, including, at a minimum, the following: Insurance Type Any Auto Amount $l,OOO,OOO.OO Combined Single Limit (CSL) or Equivalent Comprehensive General Liability $l ,000,000.00 CSL or equivalent 2. The Parties shall name each other as additional insured on the Any Auto and Comprehensive General Liability policies described above, and shall provide each other with a Certificates of Insurance for all policies required herein, which certificates shall provide and require that notice shall be given to the Parties by the carrier or carrier's representatives at least 30 days prior to any changes, cancellation, non-renewal, or lapse of the policies required herein. 3. The Parties shall fully and completely defend, indemnify and hold harmless each other and their employees, officials, officers, and agents from and against any claims for personal injury, including death, and for destruction of damage to the maintenance equipment, which claims are related to each other's maintenance equipment and the source of which occur while this Agreement is in effect. SECTION 3. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be terminated by either Party giving 30 day written notice to the other Party. The termination of this Agreement hereunder shall not prevent or interfere with the recovery by the lending Party of any damages caused to the maintenance equipment by the borrowing Party. SECTION 4. OTHER TERMINATION. NOTWITHSTANDING any other provision, if any local law, rule, regulation, or order prohibits the activities in this Agreement, then this Agreement shall be immediately terminated with both Parties owing no further compensation to each other. SECTION 5. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the Parties and no terms may be altered in any way except by the written consent of both Parties. This Agreement may not be assigned or conveyed without each Party's written consent. Pag!' 3 0/5 ISD #192 CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation BY: BY: Julie McKnight, Chair Kevan A. Soderberg, Mayor AND: AND: Dr. Bradley Meeks, Superintendent Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. ) COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2006, by Julie McKnight and Dr. Bradley Meeks, respectively the School Board Chair and Superintendent oflSD #l92, on behalf of the Farmington School District and pursuant to the authority granted by its School Board. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2006, by Kevan A. Soderberg and by Peter Herlofsky, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public Page -I 5 Farmington Parks and Recreation Department Equipment l. l445 John Deere mower 2. 5320 John Deere tractor 3. Ballfield drag 4. Turf seeder 5. Core aerator 6. X Mark mower 7. Gang mower 8. Shovels 9. Rakes lO. Scaffolding ll. Bucket truck l2. Portable bleachers 13. Pickup truck with snow plow l4. l.5 ton dump truck l5. Kromer field painter l6. Trailers EXHIBIT A Page 5 oj5 ISD#192 Buildings & Grounds Department's Equipment 1. Two Toro 580d lawn mowers 2. John Deere l445 lawn mower and broom 3. Ford eM 274 mower and snowblower 4. Kromer line painter and trailer 5. Redi-Haul trailer 6. New Holland Isl80b skid loader and attachments 7. New Holland TL80A tractor 8. Ford 2000 tractor 9. Speedy portable bleachers 10. l4' alum. Bleachers ll. Bannerman lawn aerator l2. Bifco lawn seeder 13. Rhino 7' brush cutter 14. Chevy l-ton truck, sander and snow plow 15. Chevy trucks with snowplows l6. 500 gallon water tank 17. Small hand tools Exhibit B Maintenance Equipment Lending and Borrowing Form The purpose of this form is to provide written documentation and identification of the maintenance equipment being lent and borrowed between the City of Farmington Parks and Recreation Department and Independent School District #192 Building and Grounds Department. The participants' signatures below indicate that the written information provided herein is agreed upon. I. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Date and time equipment borrowed: Date and time equipment returned: Description of equipment borrowed: Description of the location and how the equipment will be used by the borrower: General description of equipment condition when borrowed: General description of equipment condition when returned: Fuel amount when equipment is issued to borrower: Fuel amount when equipment is returned to lender: II. RESPONSIBILITIES A. BORROWER The Borrower is responsible for examining the maintenance equipment prior to receiving it from and returning it to Lender. B. LENDER Lender is responsible for examining the maintenance equipment prior to issuing to and receiving it from Borrower. C. SIGNATURES To be completed at the time equipment is both issued and returned. SIGNATURE LENDER ISSUING EQUIPMENT SIGNATURE BORROWER RECEIVING EQUIPMENT Title: Date: Title: Date: SIGNATURE LENDER RECEIVING EQUIPMENT SIGNATURE BORROWER RETURNING EQUIPMENT Title: Date: Title: Date: //a- City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter Herlofsky SUBJECT: Cataract Relief Association DATE: December 4,2006 After considerable discussion with the Cataract Relief Association, it is recommended that the benefit level for 2007 be increased by $400 to $3,750. The City's contribution to the pension of$65,OOO is already part of the 2007 budget presented to the City Council. Any discussions beyond 2007 will be part of the 2008 budget review through the normal budgeting process. /----_...-.-..~..,.,' / ~.f f/\ ~^1' \ . ~'- .~. IL-'" u. j I " (,/~. / J >1) Peter J. Herlofsky,jJr. City Administrator CMuller/Herlofsky/Fire Dept/Cataract Relief 12-4-06 )... , , )!a- Date: November 27th, 2006 From: Mayor & Council Farmington Cataract Relief Association Association Pension Request for 2007 To: Subject: The Board of the Farmington Fire Department Cataract Relief Association has had the opportunity to meet and discuss the Relief Associations pension request for 2007 on a couple of different occasions. The goal of the Board is to get to the Stanton Group 6 City pension amount average over a four year period. We have submitted a projected four year plan, as requested, that supports this request. Our pension fund ratio is looked at annually and thus our yearly request in this plan may be modified, With this being said, the original decision of the Board remains, a yearly increase from $3,350.00 to $3,750.00 in pension and a city's contribution of $65,000.00. Thank you. Respectfully submitted, fkvrh [~ !) Thomas E. Hemish Secretary c.c, Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator Robin Roland, City Finance Director Cataract Board of Directors File ,l. - Date: November, 27th 2006 To: Farmington City Council Members From: Farmington Fire Department Cataract Relief Association Re: Retirement Benefit program As a member in good standing in the Cataract Relief Association I, the undersigned, having been informed by our Board of Trustees the current status of our funds, do hereby support the recommendation presented by this Board to the City Council on November, 2ih of 2006. K.KUCHERA D. THELEN J.SAUBE F. BLAH T. THRAEN T. PIETSCH 1 ..hl1n ,~ 'i-ci~ B.SAUBER~ J. MEYER -,J?17tV\.- T. HEMISH /-n7 I. J J. JACOBSON 't.e~- T. AUGE M. KINDSETH J. CLINKSCALES T. LARSON T. CORRIGAN J. ADELMAN B. PARKER K. KUEHN T. KINDSETH D.MEYER --~-..----._~-_.. _/ ~.~ ) ('VI' lit -ivv-- ;/ At . R. ELLINGSWORTH R. LINDSTROM T. VERCH J. TULLAR M.WISE S. LERBAKKE M. JACOBSON C. ROGNLlEc?-" D. SENDER J. SCHMITZ J. BAUMAN J. ELVESTAD T. VANDERLlN A. FISCHER R. EIBNER ~~ A. SKLUZACEK /JoT AUltluMt C.MATEK C. BENJAMIN E. PETERSON J.ALM Z.RADERM K. ~E L\.-"f I//; City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator(j Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer TO: SUBJECT: Approve Change Order - Spruce Street Extension Project DATE: December 4, 2006 INTRODUCTION Forwarded herewith for Council's consideration are the items for Change Order #1 for the Spruce Street Extension Project. DISCUSSION There are 17 items that make up Change Order #1. Items 1-12 are add items and items 13-17 are deduct items. Following is a description of the change order items: 1 ADDITIONAL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B418, ON DENMARK AVE, - ~ CO. SHARE - $2,880 The City and County decided to connect the curb on the west side of Denmark approximately 100' S/O the bridge to the curb at the Spruce Street end radius. The County will be paying for 50% of this cost. 2 PRICE INCREASE FOR "EPOXY COATED" FITTINGS - $5,479.06 The specifications did not include epoxy coating for the watermain fittings, City staff requested the addition of the coating. The Water Board will fund this cost. 3 PRICE INCREASE FOR 16" GATE VALVE -ADD "GEAR REDUCTION" - $8,083.36 City staff requested this addition to the 16" gate valves in order to make operating the valves more efficient. The Water Board will fund this cost. 4 GEOFOAM BLOCKS FOR LIGHTWEIGHT FILL OVER NNG LINE - $23,868.00 This was a requirement of North em Natural Gas Company. Based on initial interactions with the gas company, the original plan called for a combination of rubber tire lightweight fill and regular fill over the gas line. Further analysis showed that use of rubber tires only was still too heavy and also indicated a possible instability issue. It was determined that use of geofoam block as fill over the gas line was the option to meet the gas company's requirements to minimize the overburden pressure on the gas line. This item has a corresponding deduct in SELECT GRANULAR BORROW as shown below. Spruce Street Extension Project December 4, 2006 Page 2 5 PRICE DIFFERENCE - CHANGED TREE GRATES - $2,388.75 The specified tree grates were painted steel grates. City staff requested that the tree grates match the downtown grates, i.e. cast iron, not painted and allowed to rust like the downtown grates. This cost is the difference in price between the specified grates and the requested grates, which are two completely different items. 6 2" COPPER SERVICES FOR FLUSHING WATER MAIN - $2,225.38 These service locations were needed for flushing long water main stubs. This cost will be funded by the Water Board. 7 REP AIR/REGRADE AREAS AFTER LIGHTING CONTRACTOR INSTALLED CONDUIT - $1,278.26 Due to timing and coordination issues, the lighting contractor came in and did work after the boulevards had been graded for erosion control purposes. Re-grading was required. 8 INSTALL 4" PVC CONDUIT CROSSINGS FOR LIGHTING PROJECT - $4,080.00 Due to timing issues, these conduits were installed by the road contractor instead of the lighting contractor so that the road contractor could keep working. If not added to this project, this cost would have been in the lighting contract. 9 EDGE MILL DENMARK FOR STEP JOINT (1975LF) - $2,843.89 This method is a more effective and durable way to make a joint. This item replaces SAWING BIT PAVEMENT which is shown below as a deduct. 10 FLOATING SILT CURTAIN - $850.00 Once the project was cleared in an area where there was dense brush, a backwater pool was discovered and this silt curtain was needed to keep erosion out of the Vermillion River. 11 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - $14,189.70 This item was shown on the plans, however there was no bid item for it on the proposal. The cost provided is reasonable compared to previous bids received for this item in the past. 12 REMOVE AND REPLACE B618 CURB DUE TO BONESTROO STAKING ERROR. - $1,650.00 Curb was installed per the staking on the project. After the installation occurred, it was noticed that there was a very small but very noticeable angle/bend in a curve which needed to be corrected. This item will be paid for by Bonestroo & Associates. 13 DELETE - PRICE DIFFERENCE FOR CHANGED LIGHT FIXTURES - ($990.78) At the request of City staff the specified fixtures were changed and the desired fixtures were less expensive. Spruce Street Extension Project December 4, 2006 Page 3 14 DELETE SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (LV), REPLACE WITH LIGHTWEIGHT FILL - ($2,220.00) The geofoam block referred to above replaced a quantity ofthis item. 15 DELETE -18" GATE VALVE AND BOX CUT IN AT HICKORY STREET- ($23,000.00) The timing of the construction did not allow this operation to occur. This item was added down the street from the project as something that would be nice to get done if possible. It will be accomplished in a future project. 16 DELETE - MONUMENT SEALANT - ($1,050.00) This item was determined to be unnecessary, there still will be an anti-graffiti coating applied. 17 DELETE - SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (REPLACED WITH ITEM 10 ABOVE) - ($2,518.80) See item #9 above. BUDGET IMPACT The total cost for the change order is $40,036.82. The original construction budget, not including the added items (Water Main, Roadway Streetscaping and Entry Monuments) was $2,146,064.00. The original construction contract bid cost for these items came in at $2,109,259.00. The bid cost for added on items totaled $801,593 to bring the total construction bid cost to $2,910,852. In summary, Report items estimate: Roadway, Bridge, Denmark, Storm Sewer $2,146,064 $2,109,259 Report items as Bid: Add-on items as Bid: Water Main $316,376 $260,882 Roadway Streetscape Entry Monuments $224,335 Total Bid: $2,910,852 Change Order # 1 $40,036.82 Change Order # 1 amount as a percentage of the construction contract: l.38% F or Council's further information, an over under spreadsheet and a revenue and expense sheet are attached along with previous documentation for the project. Spruce Street Extension Project December 4, 2006 Page 4 ACTION REQUESTED Approve by motion, Change Order #1 for the Spruce Street Extension project in the amount of $40,036.82. Respectfully submitted, ~Yvt~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file . . . I:: o I:: .(jj CO 01::0 -CIlO g>X ~ .E ~ M ro~o u.......- '500 >,CIl :!:(.) 02 a. en -01 CIl CIl Cii-o .~ :J ~.c ....co ~o roM Q5~ Clen -0 -0 :J .- co.c -0 CIl m ~I o o N ~I 10 0 ('/')0 NO 00 NO oan ..- 10 COo) N ~I 100 ('/')0 NO 00, NO, oan ..-10 CO.,O), N , ~I ~I 00 00 ~ci 0) 0 '<to Nan '<t1O '<to) N i 00 00 ~o 0)0 '<to Nan '<t1O '<to) N 00 C!o 00 00 00 cian 010 ..- 0) N UI ell :J C ell > ell D:: 00 00 oeO o I'-- a('/') "':cO co..- N(,/,) 00 00 oeO 01'-- o('/') "':cO co ..- N(,/,) -0 S-g en ::::J -0 Cl CIl U. en CIl I:: ~.... :J ~ :.0 enCll ~ -g g 01:: ro:J1:: 0:.2 ~~u.Jl1 -o1:::mECIl~ I::rol::omen ~c9~Ci5~~ 10 ('/') N o N an co I'-- eri 10 ('/') N o N an co I'-- eri o C! I'-- co co o co 0) eri o C! I'-- co co o co 0) eri o o o o o an 10 o eri ~ l!:! ! I'--IONNOOIOCOOO)OIO ~f'oo.;('/')..-OOCO'<tOOON '<t..-eOoir-.:o~oo~.oo ..- 10 co 0 co 0 co 0), 0 '<t '<t N '<to'<tOCOO'<t..-OCOOCO oerieriN...:r:tSanerio .,fr:tS 01'-- I'--('/') ('/')0) 10 ..- co co N N 1'--10 ~f'oo.; '<t ..- 10 '<to oeri 01'-- 10..- N NNOOlOl'--Oo)OIO ('/')"-C!C!~10000N eOoil'--o..-eOo-i.oo cooCOOCOOO'<t'<tN '<t 0 co 0 '<t 10 0 co o.co eriN .r:tSanNo '<tr:tS I'--(,/,) coO) co ('/') N N ~ N I'-- 0). ..- I'-- 0) ~ ..- ..- I'-- r:tS 0) COO co N 10 I'-- -i .0 oi I'-- ..- co '<t '<t co "':eri 0 ('/')..- 10 I'-- N 0) N N I'-- 0) cO '<t o r:tS o 10 N N co co eO eO ('/') ('/') o 0 o 0 '<t '<t co 0 ;~ ~ ~tl "':eril~1 CJ) """"" ~ CONd) N ~ I'-- 0) cO '<t o r:tS o 10 o o eO co ('/') o co ..- N o o eO co ('/') o co ..- N co N N ('/') r-: I'-- o '<t en en ti C ~ CIl 1: ~ 8 I:: I:: o 0 E t5 -0 ~ 2 ~ct? c: ~ c 8~ 8 I:: .Q tiCll 216 t?E I:: CIl 0:= 0<{ 1: CIl ~ ro ~ u Cl > .E~~ ti ,s: ~ I:: ro ~ Cl ~ .~ ,~ B en .~~ro~2l 8 "E '-0)':::0(1) Cl.l!l CIl Cl ~ ,Q..!!1 0.. 8 I:: .- E .s: I:: a..S: ,- E - .- E Et....(I'J(l'JC)t.n ~&:&l~ill~~ I'-- ..- oi I'-- co o I'-- N I'-- ..- oi I'-- co o I'-- N N 10 N '<t co r:tS '<t N Qi-o .s:::.5 CoO co o oi ~ U; N N co eO ('/') o o ~ o 0) .0 co q 0; N o N oi ('/') o r:tS ..- N >, U I:: CIl Cl I:: E o o '<t o ~ co a. '<t C! '<t co O. ClClenu I:: .s: .~ ,!!1 .(jj 1: a. E :e .~ g. Qi CIl ,. en .s:::. > "- -0 0 ";l; .. 0) '<t ..- cO I'-- q 0) ('/') "-C'\! cON I'-- N qo oi o N eri eO o I'-- oi I'-- '<t eri ..- N eO 0) '<t an co N N ..- o co ..- cO 10 10 N '<t N I'-- 0). ..- I'-- ..- N '<t N I'-- "l. ..- I'-- ..- 0) ~ ..- ..- I'-- r:tS 0) Ol ~ ..- ..- I'-- r:tS e o C! I'-- co co o co 0) eri o C! I'-- co co o co 0) eri o o o o o an 10 o eri en CIl .... ~ -0 I:: CIl a. x w ro 15 I- ~ I:: ro ro CO ti CIl 'e- a.. . . . Values Statement Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional and cost-effective manner. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Ethics and Integrity We believe that ethics and integrity are the foundation blocks of public trust and confidence and that all meaningful relationships are built on these values. Open and Honest Communication We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. Cooperation and Teamwork We believe that the public is best served when departments and employees work cooperatively as a team rather than at cross purposes. Visionary Leadership and Planning We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be visionary and to plan for the future. Positive Relations with the Community We believe that positive relations with the community and public we serve leads to positive, involved, and active citizens. Professionalism We believe that continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism and are committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and the development of our employees. R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON DECEMBER I, 2006 Vendor ADAMSON, MARK AFFINITY PLUS FEDERAL CREDIT U Business Unit RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CITY OF FARMINGTON 11/30/200612:55:41 Council Check Summary Page - 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Object Amount PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 125.00 125,00 CREDIT UNION PAYABLE 2,125,00 2,125,00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,180,00 3,180,00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 70,00 70,00 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 60,00 60,00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 104.00 104,00 COST OF GOODS SOLD 685,80 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,200,85 1,886,65 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 300,00 300.00 OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,126.25 1,126,25 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,139,50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 27.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,233.48 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17,216.80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 38,206.48 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,775,92 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 34,392.87 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 42,645,86 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,265,25 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 360,00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 759,82 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 494,68 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 26,920,30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 65,202,33 AFLAC ALLlNA MEDICAL CLINIC AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RETIRE ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER BELLBOY CORPORATION BERG, JASON BLAUER TACTICAL SYSTEMS BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLlK INC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND HUMAN RESOURCES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS FIRE SERVICES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PILOT KNOB LIQUOR RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PATROL SERVICES ENGINEERING SERVICES STREET MAINTENANCE ASH STREET PROJECT MAIN STREET 195TH ST EXTENSION 208th ST WEST SPRUCE ST EXTENSION ELM ST RECONSTRUCTION TH #3 IMP CITY HALL FIRST STREET GARAGE STORM WATER TRUNK PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS FLAGSTAFF AVE ~ R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 11/30/200612:55:41 Council Check Summary Page - 2 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount HILLDEE RECONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16,148.32 MIL & OVERLAY ANNUAL PRJ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,788.83 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,371.54 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 300.00 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,988.85 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,507,61 WELL #8 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 987,50 299,732,94 BRIESACHER, WAYNE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 9.32 9.32 CANNON RIVER 'MNERY DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 480.00 480,00 CANNON VALLEY PRINTING RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 1,800,68 1,800,68 CITIES ELECTRIC INC DEPOT WAY ART PARK OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 7,000,00 7,000,00 CMI MAILING & MARKETING SVS RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 2,387.35 2,387.35 CNH CAPITAL STREET MAINTENANCE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 393.42 PARK MAINTENANCE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 417.05 810.47 COLLOVA, JENNIFER STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 40.05 40.05 CORRARO, STEVE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 750,00 750,00 D R HORTON ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000,00 2,000,00 DAKOTA COMMUNICATIONS CENTER PATROL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,099.44 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 549,73 1,649,17 DELEGARD TOOL CO FLEET OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 96.89 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 11/30/200612:55:41 Council Check Summary Page - 3 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 96.89 DEUTSCHLE, GARY SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 156.53 156,53 [CM rUOLlSI\[RS INC ELECTIONS LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 9900 99,00 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 97,36 ELECTIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 22,62 ELECTIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 159,75 279.73 FARMINGTON BOYS BASKETBALL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500,00 500,00 FARMINGTON EAGLES CLUB PILOT KNOB LIQUOR PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 478,88 478,88 FARMINGTON EMPLOYEE CLUB EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE CLUB 51.00 51.00 FARMINGTON GIRLS BASKETBALL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500,00 500,00 FARMINGTON PRINTING INC GENERAL ACCOUNTING OUTSIDE PRINTING 232.17 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 185.31 417.48 FARMINGTON, CITY OF FIRE SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 150.00 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 100.00 250.00 FIRE SAFETY USA INC FIRE SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 3,120.00 3,120.00 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COMPANY DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 138,60 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 138,60 277.20 FORCE AMERICA FLEET OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 251.45 251.45 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 11/30/200612:55:41 Council Check Summary Page - 4 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Vendor Business Un~ Object Amount FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS PATROL SERVICES TELEPHONE 67,02 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE TELEPHONE 188,58 255,60 GALLS INCORPORATED GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET MN SALES TAX DUE 11.37- RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 186.24 174.87 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 419.05 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 419.05 838,10 GREEN LAWN UNDERGROUND SPRINKL DEPOT WAY ART PARK BUILDING & STRUCTURE 9,972.75 9,972,75 GRIGGS COOPER & CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 7.382,21 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 6.837,97 14.220.18 GS DIRECT INC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES 29.76 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 29.76 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 29.77 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 29.76 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 29.77 148.82 HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE CHEMICALS 14.948,94 14.948,94 HEALTH PARTNERS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,969.86 5.969,86 HELM ELECTRIC INC PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 370.00 370.00 HOLLATZ. LEE INVESTIGATION SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 29.99 29.99 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND ICMA PAYABLE 4.586,92 4.586,92 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 11/30/200612:55:41 Council Check Summary Page - 5 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount IMAGES ON METAL INC RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 2,142.23 2,142.23 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 48.00 48.00 JG WEAR RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 364.70 364.70 JIFFY-JR PRODUCTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 45.90 45.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPAN DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 5,036,65 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 6,603.49 11,640,14 JOHNSON, THAREN RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50,00 50,00 KALLEVIG, DUANE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 16.80 16.80 KEEPRSINC POLICE ADMINISTRATION UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 59.95 PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 1,152,22 1,212,17 KELLY ELECTRIC INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 80.00 80.00 LAMETTRYS COLLISION LAKEVILLE INSURANCE INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE 2,148.98 2,148,98 LAND'S END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS POLICE ADMINISTRATION UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 247.45 247.45 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND LELS DUES PAYABLE 259,00 259,00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE 24,263,09 24,263,09 LEONARD, MICHELLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DEPOSITS PAYABLE 563,00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 11/30/200612:55:41 Council Check Summary Page - 6 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 563,00 LEWIS, KENNETH R BUILDING INSPECTIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 36:49 36.49 LOCAL GVMT INFO SYSTEMS ASSN, HUMAN RESOURCES DATA PROCESSING 1,102.00 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA PROCESSING 1,021.00 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 1,515,75 GENERAL ACCOUNTING DATA PROCESSING 1,829,00 BUILDING INSPECTIONS DATA PROCESSING 1,560,00 POLICE ADMINISTRATION DATA PROCESSING 5,253.00 POLICE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 360.00 SEVVER OPERA nONS EXPENSE DATA PROCESSING 335.50 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS DATA PROCESSING 335.50 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS DATA PROCESSING 335.50 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE DATA PROCESSING 335.50 13,982,75 LUND MARTIN CONSTRUCTION INC FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTRACTS PAYABLE 59,738.00 FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 5,165,00 64,903.00 M, AMUNDSON LLP DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 471.70 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 157,60 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,153,98 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 109,20 1,892.48 MAXIMUM VOLTAGE FIRE SERVICES EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 79:82 79.82 MEDICA EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 49,691.48 49,691.48 METRO DINING CLUBS RAMBLING RIVER CENTER OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,575.00 1,575.00 MINNESOTA AFSCME COUNCIL #5 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND AFSCME UNION DUES PAYABLE 729.89 729.89 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 110.82 110,82 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 11/30/200612:55:41 Council Check Summary Page - 7 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK AS RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 1,300,00 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 170,00 1,470,00 MINNeSOTA STATe ReTIReMENT EYS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN 1,951 55 1,951.55 MISKOWlCZ, LEWIS RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 75.00 75.00 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 30.11 30.11 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 1,314.24 1,314.24 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WATER UTILITY EXPENSE SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 23.00 23.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND GARNISHMENT PAYABLE 283.23 283.23 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA LIFE INS PAYABLE 66,00 66.00 MN/SCIA INVESTIGATION SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 340.00 340.00 MOODY COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 175,00 175,00 MULLER, CYNTHIA ELECTIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 17.80 17.80 MVTL LABORATORIES INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 114,25 114,25 NORMAN. PATTI RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 11.68 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 36,49 48.17 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 11/30/200612:55:41 Council Check Summary Page - 8 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount NORTH TRAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 200.00 200.00 NORTHWEST BITUMINOUS INC EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 23,900.00 SILVER SPRINGS PARK OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 650,00 24,550.00 OFFICEMAX - A BOISE COMPANY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,307,00 1,307,00 PATCHIN MESSNER & DODD ELM ST RECONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,123.75 5,123.75 PAUSTIS WINE CO, DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 370.98 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 373.39 744.37 PELLlCCI HARDWARE & RENTAL POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 69,86 FIRE SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 133,35 STREET MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 16.64 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 20.75 PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 437,24 ASH STREET PROJECT OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 124.44 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 9,14 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 40,52 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 102,76 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 5,94 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 53,22 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 49,82 1,063.68 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,969.91 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 6,115.06 10,084.97 PIERCE, SANDY PATROL SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 67.65 67,65 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 6,750,00 6,750,00 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO OF AME EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,510,77 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 11/30/200612:55:41 Council Check Summary Page - 9 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 2,510,77 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA PAYABLE 11,201.49 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA 13,633.54 24,835,03 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,998,58 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,006,59 5,005,17 RACKOW, ADAM & ANGELA SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 193,90 193.90 RIGID HITCH INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 111.79 111,79 RUTZEN, JOELLEN PATROL SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 95,00 95.00 SCHWlNESS LLC PILOT KNOB LIQUOR BUILDING RENTAL 13,810.49 13,810.49 SILVERADO LANDSCAPING INC ASH STREET PROJECT OTHER 1,502,00 1,502,00 STREICHER'S PATROL SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 336.54 PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 1,248.18 INVESTIGATION SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 57.45 1,642.17 SUMMIT CUSTOM LANDSCAPE INC PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 181,05 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,365,00 3,546,05 THRAEN, TERRY FIRE SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 246.60 FIRE SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 157.53 404.13 TIGER AAU BASKETBALL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500,00 500,00 TKDAINC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 472.97 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 11/30/200612:55:41 Council Check Summary Page - 10 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 472.97 945.94 TWIN CITY HYDRO SEEDING INC PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND MN SALES TAX DUE 40.46- MEADOW CREEK 3RD OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 662: 96 622.50 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11.45 11,45 VART HEM COFFEE CAFE HRNECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 140.40 140.40 VIDEOTRONIX INC FIRE SERVICES BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 302.26 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 72,60 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 90,75 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 90,75 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 18.15 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 90.75 665.26 VINOCOPIA DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 500,00 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 148,00 648,00 WINE COMPANY, THE PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 168.00 168.00 WINE MERCHANTS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 121.38 121:38 WINKELMAN, JODY SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS RENTAL INCOME 15.00 15.00 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC SPRUCE ST EXTENSION CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 142,727.42 142,727.42 WYANDT, SHANE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 400.00 400.00 ZAHL-PETROLEUM MAINTENANCE CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 144,84 11/30/200612:55:41 CITY OF FARMINGTON R55CKSUM LOG23000VO Page - 11 Council Check Summary 11/20/2006 - 12/03/2006 Amount 144,84 289,68 Object OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS Business Unit PILOT KNOB LIQUOR Vendor 816,425.56 Report Totals A.PPROVALS: DERBERG MCKNIGHT PRITZLAFF WILSON