Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.02.97 Council Packet AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 2, 1997 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. - I 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3 . APPROVE AGENDA 4. CITIZENS COMMENTS (5 minute limit per person for items not on the agenda.) a. Request for Stop Sign in Dakota County Estates b. Flood Relief Efforts in Grand Forks - Fire Department 5. CONSENT AGENDA (All items approved in 1 motion unless anyone wishes an item removed for discussion) a. Minutes - 5/19 (Regular) b. Code Enforcement Policy c. pine Ridge Forest Development Agreement Amendment d. Organizational Realignment - Solid Waste e. Approve Founders Day Festival permits/Waive Fees f. Certification of Local Performance Aids g. East Farmington Third Addition Development Agreement Resolution h. 1996 Snow Removal Reimbursement i. Resolution - Approve Gambling Premise Permit - American Legion j. Request to Farm Property Acquired for Central Maintenance Facility k. Approve Payment of Bills 6. PUBLIC HEARINGs/AWARD OF CONTRACT a. Henderson Area Storm Sewer Project (Continue/Open New Hearings) b. Vacate Portion of Main Street and Alley - Eagles Club c. Award Water Tower Construction Contract (Supplemental) 7. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Fence Ordinance 9 . NEW BUSINESS a. As Built Certificate of Survey b. Debt Management Study c. County Road 31 Noise Mitigation Update (Supplemental) 10. ROUNDTABLE 11. ADJOURN TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator SUBJECT: Supplemental Agenda Items DATE: June 2, 1997 It is requested that the June 2, 1997 agenda be updated by adding information to the following items. Item 6c - Accept Bids/Award Contract for Water Tower Project Memo/resolution from City Engineer Mann regarding bids received and a recommendation for award of contract. Item 9c - County Road 31 Update Memo from City Administrator Erar providing an update on noise mitigation legislation which will impact this reconstruction project. Respectfully submitted, F. Erar Administrator CitlJ. of FarminfJ.ton 325 Oak Street · Farmington, MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fa)( (612) 463.2591 TO: ~ayor , C.o~ncilm~~ers and CIty AdmmlstratorV Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police FROM: SUBJECT: Stop Sign Request Echo Lane DATE: June 2, 1997 The City Council received a request for the placement of a Stop Sign at Echo Lane at Emerald Trail. DISCUSSION Staff spoke with the original complainant on this issue, Mr. Bob Larson. Mr. Larson stated his request was based on the number of speeders who pass on Echo Lane. After a brief discussion he indicated that most of the traffic is traveling at or under the speed but that there are several chronic violators. I explained to Mr. Larson that Stop Signs are not a preferred method of speed control and that this problem would be better remedied by the added enforcement of speed limits I further explained that there are numerous areas in the City making such requests and that Police Officers would be in the area whenever they could. Mr. Larson further described that the peak violations occurred on Friday and Saturday evenings. Mr. Larson has agreed to contact the Farmington Police Department with descriptions of violators and when possible, license numbers. With that informa:ion staff can and will contact and warn violators. RECOMMENDA nON: Staff is recommending no Stop Signs at this location at this time and that Police monitor traffic in the area with appropriate enforcement. ~~~ Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police ., Citl}. of Farmint}.ton 325 Oak Street · Farmint}ton, MN 55024 · (612) 463-7111 · Fax (612) 463-2591 COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MAY 19, 1997 5~ I. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 7:00 PM. Members Present: Ristow, Cordes, Fitch, Gamer, Strachan. Members Absent: None. Also Present: City Administrator Erar, Attorney Grannis. 2. Mayor Ristow led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. MOTION by Gamer, second by Cordes to approve the agenda with the addition of supplemental materials for Item 6c (East Farmington Third Addition Preliminary and Final Plat), Item 6d (Award Larch Street Construction Contract) and removing Item 5b for clarification (Founders Festival Sponsorship). APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 4. Citizen Comments Henry Iwerks: Reminded audience of school board election on 5/20/97. Rumor has it that the Townships have contributed $250 to Founders Festival and the City has only contributed $50. Letters to citizens should be correct especially when they contain figures. Administration should be held accountable. 5. Consent Agenda MOTION by Gamer, second by Cordes to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approve the minutes - 5/5 Regular. b) Adopt RESOLUTION NO. R57-97 - Approve Pine Ridge Forest Final Plat. c) Approve Access Agreement with Frontier - Arena Team Room Construction. d) Approve Purchase of Squad Car. e) Receive Animal Licensing Update. f) Adopt RESOLUTION NO. R58-97 - Accept Minnesota Humanities Grant to Fund Living History Quilt Project at Senior Center. g) Approve School/Conference Request - Fire Department. h) Approve payment of bills as submitted. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 6. Founders Festival Sponsorship Mayor Ristow pulled this item from Consent for clarification of the $300 level sponsorhsip. MOTION by Ristow, second by Gamer to contribute $300 to Founders Festival, and the six community dinner tickets be raffled off to City employees for $l!chance with the proceeds being donated back to the Founders Festival. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 7. Public Hearing - Vacate Portion of Main Street & Alley - Eagles Club The proposed vacation is located in Block 25, Lots 1,2,3 and Block 28, Lot 6 where the Eagle's Club building is proposed. The vacation includes Main Street and the alley to the north. Planning Coordinator Smick informed the Council that she had just received the legal description for the preparation of the vacation process, and it needed to be reviewed. Therefore, she recommended that the public hearing be continued at the June 2, 1997 regular Council meeting. MOTION by Gamer, second by Strachan to continue the public hearing for the Main Street vacation on June 2, 1997 at 7:00 PM. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 8. Henderson Area Storm Sewer Project 96-2 City Engineer Lee Mann explained that the project would address drainage and groundwater issues that have been identified in the 1993 Facilities Plan. Currently this area has no storm sewer, and large areas of overland flow and high groundwater. The lack of an adequate drainage system contributes to street deterioration and presents safety concerns with ponding and ice, especially at the low area on Hickory between 7th and 8th Street. The storm sewer would be constructed between 7th and 10th Street, generally along the alignment of Hickory Street. The estimated total project cost is $397,900. The City's share of the cost would be $239,200; $91,000 would be assessed; and MnDOT's estimated share, based on the drainage area of TH 3 benefiting from the improvements, comes to 18% or $67,500 of the total storm sewer cost. Per the City's assessment policy, 100% of the lateral storm sewer costs would be assessed against the benefiting properties. The estimated assessment for benefiting residential properties is $1,530 per buildable lot, and $6,570/acre for commercial property, multi-family property and MnDOT right of way. An appraiser determined that the proposed assessments are within the value increase. The costs would be assessed over a 10 or 15 year period with the City's share of the cost funded by the Storm Water Trunk Fund. The public commented: John Ristow, 913 9th St. - Regarding the ditch with standing water along Hwy 50, will anything be done about this problem? Engineer Mann - It is not included in this project, but wiII be addressed in the Ash Street improvement project. Harold Wieben, 805 9th St. - There is a manhole on the east side of Hickory and 10th Streets. It appears to flow east. Engineer Mann - We will investigate these observations. MnDOT is involved in the project. Bob Nerud, J001 Ash St. - WiII the pond by Townsedge shopping center stay a pond? Mann - Yes. Joy Eldred, 813 10th St. - Is any funding coming from the storm water utility fee that we pay quarterly? Finance Director Robin Roland - Yes, it wiII be used to pay the City's portion of the project. Joy Eldred - There is a holding pond/ditch just east of Henderson. What wiII become of that? Mann - It wiII be piped in a future phase of the Prairie Waterway. Bernice Ryan, 816th 8th St. - Why am I included in the project assessment boundaries? Mann - Your water, as shown on contour maps, drains into the proposed storm sewer. Linda Tabaka, 905 9th St. - What were the assessment figures again? Mann - $1,530 over 10 or 15 years depending on Council decision. Ten years at 7 1/2% interest would be $225/yr. and 15 years at 7 1/2 % would be $175/yr. Bob Nerud - What is a buildable lot? How is it dermed? Mann - If a lot is large enough to be split, then it would be considered two buildable lots. Phyllis Kirchner, 814 9th St. - Our run off at the townhomes comes from the shopping center. Is a catch basin proposed for the area between the townhomes just east of the shopping center? It would be a good place for a catch basin and would we be charged extra for it? Mann - A catch basin in this area could certainly be considered and your assessment would not be affected. Dick Treharne, Dental Health Center, 916 8th St. - If this does not go forward, how much longer will it be before anything wiII be done? We would like to improve our parking lot. Henry 1werks, 1105 Sunnyside Dr. - Can assessment fees be negotiated? Mayor Ristow - You were involved in one last fall. Were you able to negotiate? Councilmember Gamer - Are we pulling water from TH 3 to the project? Mann - Yes, and MnDOT will participate in the costs. Gamer - Why are catch basins on 7th St.? Mann - They pick up run off from Ash St. Linda Tabaka - Will the roads be tom up and are the street repair costs part of the assessment? Mann - Yes. Everything wiII be restored to the original. None of the trunk costs are assessed. Dwight Tange, 800 8th St. - Our major run off is what comes from the shopping center. Your design won't change things the way they are now. John Ristow - Why weren't catch basins at 10th & Hickory assessed when they were installed? Administrator Erar - We have no information as to why. Perhaps it was a part of the Waterway project; most staff involved with that project is not here. We are adhering to current policy, however. Perhaps the cost was so minimal that it was not worth the expense. Harold Wieben - Put a catch basin at 10th & Hickory and go east and the problem is solved. Audrey Regenschied, 900 9th St. - Could a catch basin be added near the shopping center to collect water from the shopping center? Mann - Yes. The lowest point will be researched and whatever makes the most sense wiII be incorporated. Tange - Aren't there any other routes/options? Mann - This is the most economical and feasible plan. Councilmember Cordes - I have some concerns about certain lots as to whether they drain into this project area. Mann - Contour maps show it flows south. MOTION by Strachan, second by Fitch to continue the public hearing at the June 2nd Council meeting because of a typographical error. Corrected notices will be sent out in accordance with State Statutes. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Ristow - Would like to see a formal evaluation because the cost is too high. It could be picked up with other improvement projects in the area. This will not benefit anything east ofTH 3. Counci/member Gamer - agrees that it does not need to be corrected all the way to 10th St. Counci/member Fitch - Do the citizens have a problem with the project? We should follow the policy when projects are initiated. This is consistent with policy. Wieben - the problem is between 7th & 8th Streets, not in the Henderson area. Joy Eldred - Henderson's water is not a problem any longer. It has been alleviated in the past couple years since the Waterway was installed. Mann - MnDot wiII not allow us to put run off in their ditch. Attorney Grannis - If this is not to go forward, you can stop it tonight or continue to June 2 and then make a decision. Wait till June 2nd to make a decision either way, thereby giving staff and Council more time to investigate. MOTION by Gamer, second by Fitch to set a public hearing on the Henderson Storm Sewer project with correction and clarifying information contained in the notice to insure that the statutory requirements ofMN Statute 429 are met. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Both public hearings wiII run concurrently. 9. Public Hearing - East Farmington Third Addition Preliminary & Final Plat Planning Coordinator Lee Smick gave an overview of the Plat. It is located to the north and west of East Farmington first Addition. The 36 acres wiII allow for 80 single-family lots ranging in size from 6,000 to 8,000 sq. ft. The plat follows the typical block and lot layouts found in East Farmington First and Second Additions. Traffic flow is addressed in the Developer's Agreement. The following comments were made: Kevin Schonhardt, 1013 Walnut St. - Asked when more stop signs could be installed. Traffic flow has worsened with the stop sign that was added. SLOW-CONSTRUCTION signs have not been installed. Kevin Hand, 509 10th St. - Had some concerns about the architectural diversity and involvement of the residents. Nancy Porter, 509 10th St. - Would like slower traffic and crosswalks painted Developer Rod Hardy - The Developer retains the responsibility of handling these requests. Park equipment has been ordered, driveways are being monitored to meet the standards. Stop signs wiII be installed in key locations. He would like to meet with those interested in forming the Homeowners Association. MOTION by Gamer, second by Cordes to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Gamer, second by Fitch to adopt RESOLUTION J59-97 approving East Farmington Third Addition Preliminary and Final Plat contingent upon approval the Engineering Department and subject to the execution a developer's agreement. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 10. Award of Contract - Larch Street Improvement 97-6 City Engineer Lee Mann stated that the installation of the Larch Street Access Improvements is part of the developer's agreement between the City and Sienna Corporation for the East Farmington Development. Five bids were received and Ryan Contracting, Inc. submitted the low bid in the amount of$133,849.05. The total estimated cost of the project based on the low bid is $240,000. The City wiII be assessing 100% of the cost of the east frontage road and 50% of the median road improvements against the plat. The assessed amount wiII be bonded over a ten year period and the City's portion wiII be funded through the Road and Bridge fund. MOTION by Gamer, second by Strachan to adopt RESOLUTION R60-97, accepting the bids and awarding the contract to Ryan Contracting, Inc. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 11. Elm Street Extension Feasibility Study, Project 97-15 City Engineer Lee Mann presented the feasibility report for the construction of an extension of Elm Street just east of TH 3 and north of 9th Street. These street and utility improvements are necessary for the expansion of South Suburban Medical Center. The medical center would pay for all costs associated with the street and utility improvements and would waive their right to a public hearing regarding the assessment of costs for the project. The estimated total project cost is $308,600, not including the easement costs that may be incurred, which would be the responsibility of the medical center. Bryan Ordorff stated his concerns with the plan which now created traffic in his back yard, as well as his front yard. Engineer Mann wiII look into the possibility of creating a berm or landscape screening on 9th Street. MOTION by Cordes, second by Gamer to adopt RESOLUTION R61-97 accepting the feasibility study and ordering the Elm Street Extension Project 97-15. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 12. Akin Park Second Addition Storm Sewer Improvement City Engineer Lee Mann introduced the ongoing storm sewer issue in Akin Park Second Addition, specifically with the pond that lies on the northern boundary of the elementary school property and the residents that live along 193rd Street. Two storm sewer outlets discharge into swales midway between the homes and the pond. The swales have eroded and have become unsightly and difficult to maintain. The developer has agreed to regrade the swales to drain, sod the swales and remove the silt from the pond that has built up from erosion. A deadline of May 29, 1997 has been set. If the developer does not meet this deadline, the City will hire a contractor to perform this improvement and charge the developer. This restorative work would likely erode again unless a more permanent solution is undertaken. The existing pipes could be extended 50-60 feet and the swale rip-rapped for erosion control for an approximate cost of$14,700. Three options for funding were considered: 1) Residents could submit a signed petition requesting the improvement stating that they would pay for 100% of the costs and waive their rights to a public hearing and appeal. 2)Council could assess 35% of the cost which would be $5,510 and the City would pick up the balance of$9,550. This would require the full process set forth by MN Statute 429.3) Council could pay for 100% of the cost using the Storm Water Trunk Fund. MOTION by Gamer, second by Strachan to have the City pay for 100% of the cost of improvements and adopt RESOLUTION R62-97 ordering the project. VOTING FOR: Ristow, Gamer, Cordes, Strachan. VOTING AGAINST: Fitch. 13. Akin Park Second Addition Bike Path Repair According to a memo outlined by Parks and Recreation Director Jim Bell, the bike path on 193rd Street, between 5410 residence and the new CR 31 alignment, is in need of repair due to home construction since the installation of the path. Improper installation could not be proven. The repairs include patching damaged portions, cutting out along driveways for a better transition, matting the entire length to remove as many low areas as possible and restoring adjacent property to original condition after the matting process. The funding of $4,880 will come from the Park Improvement Fund. Staff is reviewing policy with the PARAC to determine a solution to future problems of this nature. MOTION by Gamer, second by Fitch, directing staff to proceed with the repair of the trail after obtaining the necessary quotations. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 14. Train Whistle Ban Administrator Erar provided the Council with his fmdings of the legal and public safety issues concerning a train whistle ban during the early morning hours of3:00 AM - 6:00 A.\1. CounciImember Gamer stated that the problem has lessened recently. Administrator Erar will contact Congressman Luther for assistance in this matter. 15. CityfIownship Recreational Programming Issues - Puppet Wagon Parks and Recreation Director Bell informed the Council that the PARAC approved a policy and fee for puppet wagon requests in neighboring townships. Terry Holmes of the Empire Town Board was contacted and agreed with the policy. MOTION by Gamer, second by Strachan to accept RESOLUTION R63-97 amending Resolution R8-97 (1997 Fees and Charges) by setting a fee of$IOO for each puppet performance conducted in townships. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 16. Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption on Signal at TH 3 and Ash Street, Project 97-03 City Engineer Lee Mann introduced plans for installing the Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption (EVP) system on the signal at Ash street and TH 3 as proposed in the 1997 Capital Improvement Plan. This project is being constructed under the MnDOT Metro Division Municipal Agreement Program which will provide for 75% of the EVP installation and 8% for construction engineering contingent upon being awarded before July 1, 1997. Estimated installation, engineering, legal, administration costs will total $27,500. MnDOT's share of this cost is $16,200; Municipal State Aid will fund $6,600, and the City's Road and Bridge fund will cover the remaining share of approximately $4,700. MOTION by Gamer, second by Cordes to adopt RESOLUTION R64-97 approving the plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for bids contingent upon the execution of the cooperative agreement. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 17. Roundtable Councilmember Fitch: The efficient, friendly and smiling staff is to be complimented for a job well done at the recent Clean Up Day. Mayor Ristow: Requested that residents' concern for railroad traffic blocking emergency vehicles be addressed in the City newsletter. - Welcomed a new business, New York Life Insurance, to the Industrial Park. - Public hearing for Main Street improvement is scheduled for June 27 at the Library. Resident on Echo Drive: Concerned about traffic being too fast on this street and wonders if something could be done about it. Administrator Erar: Fire Department sent two fIrefIghters to Grand Forks to help flood victims. FEMA will pick up their living expenses. - The state legislature may go into special session since the tax bill-levy limitations have not been resolved. - The noise mitigation legislative ruling will exempt the County from adherence; the straightening of CR 31 can go forward. Community Development Director David Olson: The last meeting for overlay zone issue will be May 21, 1997 at 7:00 PM. MOTION by Fitch, second by Gamer to adjourn at 10: 10 PM. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Submitted by, Jeanne Stanek Secretary 56 TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator~ FROM: David L. Olson Community Development Director SUBJECT: Code Enforcement Issues DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION In response to citizens' complaints regarding the storage of refuse on residential lots, I would like to review the current policy regarding the enforcement of refuse and similar types of ordinance violations. DISCUSSION Upon receiving a complaint, a Citizen Action Request form is filled out and given to the appropriate inspector to verify that a problem exists and the extent of the problem. If a problem exists, a letter of notification is mailed to the property owner via certified mail. The property owner, according to city ordinance 7-1-7 (B), is given ten days to correct the situation. We have checked with the cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Lakeville and Rosemount and found that all four cities handle their complaints on a reactive basis similar to the process that we currently follow. They reported that they did not have the staff to inspect and enforce on a proactive basis, which in my opinion, is the situation in Farmington as well. ACTION REQUIRED No action is required by the City Council, only the verification to continue with the current policy and past practice. Respectfully submitted, ?J,.;// ~~ David L. Olson Community Development Director CitlJ. of Farmint}ton 325 Oak Street · FarminlJton} MN 55024 · (612) 463-7111 · Fax (612) 463-2591 5c TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator FROM: Lee Smick, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Pine Ridge Forest Developer's Agreement Amendment DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION An amendment to the Pine Ridge Forest Developer's agreement has been requested by the developer of the project to attach a statement within the agreement describing the amount of parkland dedicated by the developer at the Pine Ridge Forest site. DISCUSSION The developer for Pine Ridge Forest has requested to attach an amendment to the approved Developer's Agreement stating the amount of parkland donated by the develqper above and beyond the amount required by City Code. Pine Ridge Forest is platted on 30.6143 acres and the dedicated amount of parkland required by City Code is 3.83 acres. The developer has dedicated a total of 5.5051 acres or 1.68 acres more than the City Code requires in order to preserve the ridge and as many trees as possible on the property. Attached is a letter from Jim Bell, Parks and Recreation Director, to Tim Giles, Pine Ridge Forest developer, stating the amount of parkland dedicated. ACTION REQUIRED Adopt a resolution to approve the amendment to the Pine Ridge Forest Developer's Agreement stating the amount of parkland dedicated by the developer and contingent on the signing ofthe Developer's Agreement. Respectfully submitted, txt hJ2 Lee Smick /V () Planning Coordinator ~ Citlj of Farmint}.ton 325 Oak Street · Farmin9ton, MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fax (612) 463.2591 FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 2nd day of June, 1997, by and between the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation (City) and Pine Ridge of Farmington, LLP, a limited liability partnership (Developer). WHEREAS, City and Developer entered into a Development Contract dated May 5, 1997, recorded in the Office of the Dakota County Recorder as Document No. (Contract); and WHEREAS, City and Developer desire to amend the Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, City and Developer agree as follows: 1. Parkland Dedication Pine Ridge of Farmington, LLP, has donated a total of 5.051 acres of parkland to the City of Farmington, which is 1.68 acres more than required by City Code. 2. Except as modified herein, the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first written above. DEVELOPER: Pine Ridge of Farmington, LLP CITY OF FARMINGTON Timothy Giles, President Gerald Ristow, Mayor John F. Erar, City Administrator NOTARY: NOTARY: City Seal PRO P 0 SED RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT - Pine Ridge Forest Addition - Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 2nd day of June, 1997 at 7:00 P.M.. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R56-97, the City Council approved the Development Contract for pine Ridge Forest Addition (Contract) which sets forth various terms and conditions; and WHEREAS, said Contract was recorded in the office of the Dakota County Recorder on as Document NO. ; and WHEREAS, the Developer, pine Ridge of Farmington, LLP, has requested the City officially recognize the donation of 1.68 acres more parkland than required by City Code; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Developer to have such donation noted and attached to said Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Development Contract for pine Ridge Forest Addition is hereby amended by adding the following language: Pine Ridge of Farmington, LLP, (Developer) has donated a total of 5.051 acres of parkland to the City of Farmington, which is 1.68 acres more than required by City Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, except as modified above, the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 2nd day of June, 1997. Mayor Attested to the ____ day of June, 1997. SEAL Clerk/Administrator May 27, 1997 Tim Giles Pine Ridge of Farmington 8343 2l0th St. West Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 Dear Mr. Giles, When platting, the City requires 12 1/2 % land or the cash equivalent of the plat for park purposes. Council establishes a value of$15,000 / acre for dedication fees when cash is accepted rather than land. The Pine Ridge Forest Plat is platted on 30.6143 acres. The dedicated amount of parkland for the plat is 3.83 acres. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended to Council the dedication ofland only. Your total land dedication is 5.5051 acres or 1.68 acres more than is required by ordinance. The City apprec~.ates this generous offer to donate an extra 1.68 acres to enhance the adjoining parkland and to preserve the ridge and many trees on the property. The value of the donation based on the park dedication ordinance is $25,200. Thank you for this generous donation and it has been a pleasure working with you on this matter. Sincerely, ~~~ James Bell Parks and Recreation Director cc: Mayor and Council John Erar Dave Olson Lee Smick CitlJ of Farmint}.ton 325 Oafe Street · Farmington, MN 5502~ · (612) ~63. 7111 · Fa/( (612) ~63.2591 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers ~ FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator SUBJECT: Organizational Realignment - Solid Waste Services DATE: June 2, 1997 Upon the departure of the former City Engineer, a temporary reassignment of organizational activities was implemented to ensure that services in the Public Works Department were appropriately overseen and managed during the interim period. During this interim period, solid waste services were assigned to the Parks and Recreation Department. DISCUSSION After a thorough review, it has been determined that solid waste services will remain under the Parks and Recreation Department. The provision of this service over the last several months under the oversight of the Parks and Recreation Department indicates that the quality and level of solid waste services provided will remain high and customer service oriented. This realignment is appropriate given the type and nature of the service provided, workload criteria involved in the provision of the service, and is consistent with other fee-for-services programs currently in the Park and Recreation Department, i.e. ice arena, the municipal pool, summer programs" and senior center programs. The City Code provides that the administrator has the ability to assign and/or reassign City operations based on individual capabilities and available resources regarding the internal administration of City affairs. Accordingly, the decision to provide solid waste services by the municipality is a Council policy, the implementation of this policy is one of appropriate resource utilization, internal organizational factors and staffing. BUDGET IMPACT None. ACTION REQUESTED As this change is organizational in nature, and will have no effect on Council policy or the provision of the service to City customers, this is for information only. Res. pectfull~(lJmitted, /14 C(~ IF.Erar City Administrator Citl}. of Farmint}.ton 325 Oak Street eFarmintJtonl),W55024 e (612) 463-7111eFax (612) 463-2591 5e FROM: Mayor, councilmembe~ City AdministratorAT James Bell, Director Parks and Recreation / TO: SUBJECT: Approve Permits for 125th Founders Festival DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION Permits are needed for the 125th Founders Festival Celebration. DISCUSSION The Founders Festival Committee is requesting City Council waive fees for the permits required for the celebration. Council has authorized the waiver of permit fees in past years for the Mountain Dew Days Celebration. Attached is a list of the events which require permits and their fees. BUDGET IMPACT The total cost of waiving the permit fees for the 125th Founders Festival is $1,810. These fees were not budgeted for as revenue in the 1997 Budget. ACTION REQUIRED Approve the waiver of fees for the celebration. Respectfully submitted, ,J--. ~c:6~ James Bell Parks and Recreation Director CitlJ, of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street. Farmin9ton, MN 55024 · (612) 463-7111 · Fax (612) 463.2591 1997 FARMINGTON FOUNDER'S FESTIVAL PERMITS The following is a listing of events, sponsors, locations and the established fees for each event which requires a permit. Temporary Exhibitions - Ord. 3-17-4 - 1997 Fee = $15.00 per Event Medicine Show Dew Run Traveling Show Kiddie Parade Horseshoe Contest Dewy Duck Race Variety Show Grand Parade Medallion Hunt Kiddie Rides Food Eating Contest Dunk Tank Trout Tank Chalk Drawing Founders Festival Committee Parks and Recreation Founders Festival Committee Founders Festival Committee Eagles Club Founders Festival Committee Founders Festival Committee Founders Festival Committee Founders Festival Committee Founders Festival Committee B&B Pizza Church of the Advent Dakota County Sportsmen Parks and Recreation Downtown Library Downtown Downtown Rambling River Park Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown 14 Events x $15.00 = $210.00 Transient Merchant - Ord. 3-18-1 - 1997 Fee = $50.00 per Quarter Concession Concession Concession Concession Concession Concession ' Concession Concession Concession Concession Concession Balloons Crafts Sletten's Brad Schroeder (3) Medley Concessions Woody's Popcorn Wagon Eastern Star Taco Dick's Faith Church Youth Hockey Founder's Festival Committee Knights of Columbus Youth Hockey Matt Milner Sales Craft Vendors (20) Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Third Street Downtown 32 Vendors x $50.00 = $1,600.00 Total Cost of Permit Fees for 1997 Celebration = $1,810.00 FROM: Mayor and City Council City Administrat~ Robin Roland, Finance Director Sf TO: SUBJECT: Certification Local Performance Aid DATE: June2,1997 INTRODUCTION Minnesota Statutes Section 477A.05 provides for Local Performance Aid payable to cities having a system of performance measures. Certification of LPA must be sent to the State each year for the following year. DISCUSSION The City of Farmington has a performance measurement system built into its budgeting process. This system qualifies the City to receive LPA. The City certified LPA for the current budget year and is receiving funding through Local Government Aid. As part of the 1998 Budget process, the certification for 1998 LPA must be completed. BUDGET IMPACT Local Performance Aid receivable in 1997 is $7,709. A similar amount is anticipated in 1998. ACTION REQUESTED Signatures of the Mayor and one Council Member on the State Certification form. ;r~ . Robin Roland Finance Director City of FarminiJton 325 Oak Street · Farmintjtonl MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7111 · Fax (612) ~63.2591 II) t,p ... ::I II) co ca en G) ~ :E .: G) .! (.) .c c ca co ~ E ca ... ~ J2"'C ... < G) CI) a. u - c ca ca (J E o ... ..Jog 'to- CI) o ~ c - o ca u ;: 0 ca ...I (J ... 'i:J:! ~ G) U o oCt D.. ..J E ... o u. ... .., ... 1ft cO en N N ... e ii c: o .c Q. o .., M M cO .., ... 1ft 1ft S o III CD c: c: i '3 III Q. .. CI) E o 0 ..,- M::; MOA c: enZ .2 .E < S~H U)g~ ~f!?Z :E 8-H ~ c:'O-'lo o CIl9 a iii E..... CIl ~ ~ ;! Q )( III I- ~ 8- e Q. CD := c: CD > CD ~ - o - c: CD S ~ Q, CD Q S o III ! 'c c: ~ iiU .. c: o CIl - E E c = Qj Z CD > 0 ~ g, E-i 'g_C,,'} III ~ ~ s ~::E: CD ~ iX: "6."0< E-g~ o en U .E ~ 'iijo E:>-< "OE-i lijH CIlU E <tl Z .-I .-I .-I l""-c I .2 C""li;j \0 0 < ",.2 E-i 1-0 N 0 ~ .-I.?;o ~ \0 !Ii I-< o C,,) E-i ~ ~ p::: E-i Cf.l '" N o I.l"l I.l"l ~ ~ o I.l"l N C""l Z o E-i C,,'} Z H ~ ~ o z >< en w >- Z' 'u ~iil _ I1l >-~ .0 _ '0 I1l a>= :Q g > ::l e 0 Q.U 1IlZ' ~ 'u .~ ~ a>- III 0 ~~ 1Il- ~ 5i ::l III III a> m c. E-g a> I1l U c:'O 11l~ E '0.. .... E .g 0 a> U 0.>- _ 't: o I1l E"S a> Cl iil ~ >-1Il III ~ I1l ::l a> III > m ~E~ Z'a>m 'u gj >- :;;"5 g,~m III I1l a> a> "'0 U o c: c: Cl I1l 0 .... II) .Q o - o z ~ 'u ... = o >- ... .g .. II) 'E o ,5 ,... en en .... Q M II) C .., .., >- .Q en w >- '0 c: I1l Cl c: '0.. o Q) > a> '0 - o III III a> U e 0. a> .c: - C o 'iij '; i5 >C ca ... ~ II) c. o ... D.. or = C II) > II) 0:: - o .~ >- ('. :=: en U a> ~ 5 o III >-m .~ E cia> c: g .~ l1l a> E i;.g .0 a> I1l 0. ~ c:O .Q E iil2 a> III ::l >- 0" III .9 I1l .... Cl a> .~ 3:'E III a> ffi E a> a> ~-a ::: .~ N -co Ccn II) en E.... ~ ,5 [,!! II).Q C ca ca >- _ ca o c. al:2 coCt .5 II) :t g II) ca .c: E - ... .s.g '0 II) ~D.. :s7i _ u f,3 II) II) .Q > - 'a; III U = II) E ... E.s ... J2 II) :is .!!! 's, .c:_ I- II) CD i;j Q 'u c = o (J ~ C3 II) .c: - - o .. II) .Q E II) E ca >- .Q ! ti !!! o o "0 C III CIl .5 !!! III c .2 i;j o ... :e fl III S .E "0 CIl c: CIl III !!! Q, <II ts J!! CIl ;; i Qj .c "0 c 1\I (i) en "0 CIl 'i o c -'" :; o - o iii CIl .c Q) ;; .9 7i ;; .?;o i:3 - o e ~ i;j c en en Qj .c E CIl :E Gi - o z z. :e fl >- .c !!! CIl .r= o "0 ~ tI :~:?::::: o >- III :E '0 MINNESOTA Department of Revenue Property Tax Division Mail Station 3340 Phone (612) 296-5141 St. Paul. MN 55146-3340 Fax (612) 297-2166 March 26, 1997 TO: ALL CITY CLERKS, ADMINISTRATORS, MANAGERS, AND FINANCE DIRECTORS RE: CERTIFICATION OF LOCAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID PAYABLE IN 1998 Minnesota Statutes, Section 477A.05 provides for Local Performance Aid (LPA). In order to qualify for LP A, your city must have a system of performance measures for services provided by the city, and must regularly compile and present these measures to the city council at least once per year. Ifthere is currently no system of performance measures in place, your city may still qualify for this aid if it is in the process of developing and implementing a system of performance measures. However, eligibility based upon being in the process of development may not be used for more than two consecutive years. For the purpose of the enclosed certification form, "in the process" may include having the subject of performance measures on the agenda of the city council. The city should then use the time period between this year's certification and next year's certification to develop basic measures such as "workload," unless it has already moved beyond this stage. The second year of "in the process" must be used to move to a higher level of performance measurement, such as measuring efficiency and effectiveness. Local performance aid will be determined as follows for calendar year 1998: The total amount of aid available for cities in 1998 is $4,107,673, plus an inflation adjustment based on the implicit price deflator. A per capita aid amount will be determined by dividing the total aid available by the total population of all cities that qualify for the aid. Each qualifying city then receives an aid amount based on its population times the per capita aid amount. Distribution of LP A is based on yearly certifications for each qualifying city. Cities are required to submit an annual certification in order to receive LP A payable in calendar year 1998 and subsequent years. Note: The State Legislature is currently looking at LP A, and there could be changes which affect LP A. Your city will be notified if there are changes which affect your 1998 Certification of Local Performance Measures or your 1998 LP A. LP A will be paid in two equal installments on July 20 and December 26 of 1998. Qualifying cities will receive a certification of their 1998 LP A by J ul Y 31, 1997. ( continued) An equal opportllnity employer TDD. (612) 215-0069 Page 2 As mentioned above, your city may qualify for LP A by (1) having a system of performance measures in place, or (2) by being in the process of developing and implementing a system of performance measures. If your city qualifies for LP A by either criteria, and your city wishes to participate in the distribution of this aid for calendar year 1998, your city must fill out the enclosed certification and return it to our office by June 30, 1997. Please note: if our office does not receive a certification from your city by June 30,1997, your city will not be eligible to receive this aid in calendar year 1998. If you have any questions regarding the completion of this form. please feel free to call me at (612) 296-5141. ~relY, 'i!ffi~r Larry ~eWley Research Analysis Specialist Property Tax Division Enclosure TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator r- FROM: Lee Smick, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: East Farmington 3rd Addition Developer's Agreement DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION The Development Agreement for East Farmington 3rd Addition has been drafted in accordance with the conditions presented at the May 19th City Council meeting. DISCUSSION The East Farmington 3rd Addition Development Agreement requires the following conditions to be agreed upon: . the Developer enter into the Development Agreement; . and the Developer provide necessary security in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. The preliminary and final plat was approved by the Planning Commission on May 13, 1997. ACTION REQlJIRED Approve the execution of the Development Agreement and adopt a resolution authorizing its signing, contingent upon approval by the Engineering Department. Respectfully Sritted, (/ .~ ~J:$ 0-e'< ? Lee Smick f Planning Coordinator 53 Cit'l of FarminiJ.ton 325 Oak Street · Farminl}ton, MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7111 · Falt (612) ~63.2591 PRO P 0 SED RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - East Farmington Third Addition - Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 2nd day of June, 1997 at 7:00 P.M.. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R59-97, the City Council approved the preliminary and final plat of East Farmington Third Addition contingent upon, among other things, the signing of a development agreement; and WHEREAS, a development agreement is now before the Council for its consideration setting forth, among other things, the following: Surety Surface Water Management Fees Water Main Trunk Area Charge Sanitary Trunk Sewer Area Park Dedication Water Treatment Plant Fee Seal coating $1,632,773.44 $ 109,977.06 $ 27,407.25 $ 36,661.46 $ 50,906.25 $ 37,600.00 $ 4,240.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. The aforementioned developer's agreement, a copy of which is on file in the Clerk's office, is hereby approved. 2. The Mayor and Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to sign such agreement. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 2nd day of June, 1997. Mayor Attested to the ____ day of June, 1997. SEAL Clerk/Administrator DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AGREEMENT dated this 2nd day of June, 1997, by and between the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation (CITY) and Sienna Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (DEVELOPER). 1. Request for Plat ~proval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for East Farmington Third Addition (also referred to in this Development Contract [CONTRACT or AGREEMENT] as the PLAT). The land is legally described as: Outlot P, East Farmington First Addition 2. Conditions of Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on the condition that: a. the Developer enter into this Agreement; and b. the Developer provide the necessary security in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 3. Development Plans. The Developer shall develop the plat in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. The plans may be prepared by the Developer, subject to City approval, after entering into this Agreement but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, subject to paragraphs 6 and 31G, the plans shall control. The required plans are: Plan A - Final Plat Plan B - Final Soil Erosion Control and Grading Plans Plan C - Landscape Plan (Prepared by Derek Young - Dated 6/25/93 Revised - 8/10/94 Plan D - Zoning/Development Map Plan E - Wetlands Mitigation as required by the City's Wetland Alteration Permit Approved June 14, 1994 Plan F - Final Street and Utility Plans and Specifications 1 Developer shall use its best efforts to assure timely application to the utility companies for the following utilities: underground natural gas, electrical, cable television, and telephone. 4. Sales Office Requirements. At any location within the plat where lots and/or homes are sold which are part of this subdivision, the Developer agrees to install a sales board on which a copy of the approved plat, final utility plan and a zoning map or planned unit development plan are displayed, showing the relationship between this subdivision and the adjoining neighborhood. The zoning and land use classification of all land and network of major streets within 350 feet of the plat shall be included. 5. Zoning/Development Map. The Developer shall provide an 8 1/2" x 14" scaled map of the plat and land within 350' of the plat containing the following information: a. platted property; b. existing and future roads; c. future phases; d. existing and proposed land uses; and e. future ponds. 6. Required Public Im~rovements. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: a. Sanitary Sewer Lateral System h. Sidewalks and Trails b. Water System (trunk and lateral) i. Site Grading and Ponding c. Storm Sewer j . Traffic Control Devices d. Streets k. Setting of Lot & Block Monuments e. Concrete Curb and Gutter l. Surveying and Staking f. Street Signs m. Landscaping, Screening, Blvd. Trees g. Street Lights 2 The improvements shall be installed in accordance with Plans A through F, and in accordance with City standards, ordinances and plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer furnished to the City and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from the Metropolitan Council and other agencies before proceeding with construction. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspector(s) and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part time basis. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruct ion meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within sixty (60) days after the completion of the improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "As Built" plans. The Developer shall also supply the City with a 3.5" diskette containing the following information in an Autocad Release 12 compatible format (.dwg or .dxf files) : - approved plat - proposed utilities (storm sewer, water main, sanitary sewer) - layer names should be self explanatory, or a list must be included as a key. If the Developer does not provide such information, the City will digitize the data. All costs associated with digitizing the data will be the responsibility of the developer. 7. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by November 1, 1998. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases. 3 8. Ownership of Improvements. Upon the completion of the work and construction required to be done by this Agreement, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property, except for cable TV, electrical, gas, and telephone, without further notice or action. 9. Warranty. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for streets is one year. The warranty period for underground utilities is two years. If all improvements are installed by one contractor, the warranty period shall commence after the final wear course has been completed and the streets have been accepted by City Council resolution. If streets and underground utilities are installed by separate contractors, the warranty period on streets shall commence after the final wear course has been installed and accepted by City Council resolution and the warranty period on underground utilities shall commence following their completion and acceptance by the City. All trees shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for twelve (12) months after planting. Any replacements shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer shall post maintenance bonds or other surety acceptable to the City to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the bonds or other acceptable surety are furnished to the City or until the warranty period has been completed, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of streets and utilities. 10. Grading Plan. The plat shall be graded and drainage provided by the Developer in accordance with Plan B. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, the Developer may start rough grading the lots within the stockpile and easement areas in conformance with Plan B before the plat is filed if all fees have been paid and the City has been furnished the required security. Additional rough grading may be allowed upon obtaining written authorization from the City Engineer. 4 If the developer needs to change grading affecting drainage after homeowners are on site, he must notify all property owners/residents of this work prior to its initiation. 11. Erosion Control and Fees. After the site is rough graded, but before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if it is determined that the methods implemented are insufficient to properly control erosion. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and the City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any costs of the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. The Developer is responsible for a $ -0- Erosion and Sediment Control fee (previously paid) based upon the number of lots in the plat, plus inspection fees at the current rate of $39.00 per hour as charged by the Soil and Water Conservation District. The Developer is also responsible for a Water Quality Management Fee of $ 1,357.50 based upon the number of acres in the plat. 12. Landscaping. The Developer shall landscape the plat in accordance with Plan C. The landscaping shall be accomplished in accordance with a time schedule approved by the City. 5 13. Phased Development. The plat shall be developed in one (1) phase in accordance with Plan A. No earth moving, construction of public improvements or other development shall be done in any phase until a final plat for the phase has been filed in the County Recorder's office and the necessary security has been furnished to the City. For purposes of this requirement, outlots shall not be deemed to have been final platted, except for Outlots C, D, E. F, I and J. The City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases until public improvements for all prior phases have been satisfactorily completed. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, this Development Contract constitutes approval to develop the plat. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until development agreements for such phases are approved by the City. 14. Effect of Subdivision ~proval. For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or removing any part thereof which has not been final platted, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications or platting required or permitted by the approved preliminary plat unless required by State or Federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by State law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan (including removing unplatted property from the urban service area), official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement any may require submission of a new plat. IS. Surface Water Management Fee. The Developer shall pay an area storm water management charge of $ 109,977.06 in lieu of the property paying a like assessment at a later date. The charge shall be assessed against the lots (not outlots) in the plat over a 10 year period with interest on the unpaid balance calculated at eight percent (8%) per annum. The assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The assessments may be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to MSA 429.081. Storm sewer charges for subsequent phases shall 6 be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at the time the Development Contracts for those phases are entered into. 16. Wetland Conservation and Mitigation. The Developer shall comply with the 1991 Wetlands Conservation Act, as amended, and the Wetlands Mitigation Plan. The Developer shall pay all costs associated with wetlands conservation and the Wetlands Mitigation Plan. 17. Water Main Trunk Area Charge. The Developer shall pay a water area charge of $ 51,937.15 for the plat in lieu of the property paying a like assessment at a later date. The charge shall be assessed against the lots (not outlots) in the plat over a ten (10) year period with interest on the unpaid balance calculated at eight percent (8%) per annum. The assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The assessments may be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to MSA 429.081. Water area charges for subsequent phases shall be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at the time the Development Contracts for those phases are entered into. A credit of $24,529.90 will be given to the developer for water main trunk oversizing within the plat. The net result is that the assessment will be based on a charge of $27,407.25. 18. Water Treatment Plant Fee. The Developer shall pay a water treatment plant fee of $ 37,600.00 for the plat in lieu of the property paying a like assessment at a later date. The charge shall be assessed against the lots (not outlots) in the plat over a ten (10) year period with interest on the unpaid balance calculated at eight percent (8%) per annum. The assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The assessments may be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise 7 available pursuant to MSA 429.081. Water treatment plant fees for subsequent phases shall be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at the time the Development Contracts for those phases are entered into. 19. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Charge. The Developer shall pay a sanitary sewer trunk area charge of $ 36,661.46 for the plat in lieu of the property paying a like assessment at a later date. The charge shall be assessed against the lots (not outlots) in the plat over a ten (10) year period with interest on the unpaid balance calculated at eight percent (8%) per annum. The assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The assessments may be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to MSA 429.081. Sanitary Trunk Sewer charges for subsequent phases shall be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at the time the Development Contracts for those phases are entered into. 20. Park Dedication. The Developer shall pay a park dedication fee of $ 50,906.25 in satisfaction of the City's park dedication requirements for the plat. The park dedication fee shall be assessed against the lots (not outlots) in the plat over a ten (10) year period with interest on the unpaid balance calculated at eight percent (8%) per annum. The assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The assessments may be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to MSA 429.081. The park dedication fees for subsequent phases shall be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at the time the Development Contracts for those phases are entered into. 21. Sealcoating. In lieu of assessing sealcoating three years from completion of the road construction, the Developer agrees to pay a fee of $4,240.00 for initial sealcoating of streets in the subdivision. This fee shall be deposited in the City Road and Bridge Fund upon execution of this Agreement. 8 22. GIS Fees. The Developer is responsible for a Government Information System fee of $ 2,000.00 based upon the number of lots within the subdivision. 23. Easements. The Developer shall provide emergency access easements within thirty (30) days to Outlots C, D, E, F, I and J for police, fire, rescue and emergency calls, as well as easements to provide corner lot access to those same outlots. The easements are illustrated on the attached Exhibits. 24. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors, a license to enter the plat to perform all necessary work and/or inspections deemed appropriate by the City during the installation of public improvements by the City. The license shall expire after the public improvements installed pursuant to the Development Contract have been installed and accepted by the City. 25. Clean Up. The Developer shall weekly, or more often if required by the City Engineer, clear from the public streets and property any soil, earth or debris resulting from construction work by the Developer or its agents or assigns. All debris, including brush, vegetation, trees and demolition materials, shall be disposed of off site. Burning of trees and structures shall be prohibited, except for fire training only. 26. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, payment of real estate taxes including interest and penalties, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements in the plat and construction of all public improvements in the plat, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow, irrevocable letter of credit, or alternative security acceptable to the City Administrator, from a bank (security) for $ 1,632,773.44. The bank and form of the security shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The security shall be for a period ending December 1, 1998. The term of the security may be extended from time to time if the extension is furnished to the City Administrator at least forty-five (45) days prior to the stated expiration date of the security. If the required public improvements are not completed, or 9 terms of the Agreement are not satisfied, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of a letter of credit, the City may draw down the letter of credit. The City may draw down the security, without prior notice, for any violation of this Agreement. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: Grading/Erosion Control $ N/A Monuments $ 16,000.00 Sanitary Sewer Lateral $ 276,137.62 St. Lites/Signs $ 27,567.34 Water Main $ 304,747.04 Blvd. Trees $ 28,000.00 Storm Sewer $ 300,651.83 Blvd. Sodding $ 10,221.75 Street Construction $ 583,880.52 Wetland Mitigation $ N/A Two Years Principal and Interest on Assessments $ 85,567.34 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. 27. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to, Soil and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, administrative, construction costs, engineering, easements and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Agreement, and all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the development of the plat. B. The Developer, except for City's willful misconduct, shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages or expenses which the City may payor incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering and attorney's fees. 10 D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (3) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. 28. Trash Enclosures. The Developer is responsible to require each builder to provide on site trash enclosures to contain all construction debris, thereby preventing it from being blown off site, except as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 29. Existin9 Tree Preservation. The Developer will walk the site with the City Forester and identify all significant trees which will be removed by on site grading. A dialogue between the Developer and City Forester regarding alternative grading options will take place before any disputed tree is removed. All trees, stumps, brush and other debris removed during clearing and grubbing operations shall be disposed of off site. 30. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given written notice of the work in default, not less than 72 hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 31. Miscellaneous. A. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors or assigns, as the case may be. 11 B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. D. Building permits shall not be issued prior to completion of rough site grading, installation of erosion control devices and submittal of a surveyor's certificate denoting all appropriate monuments have been installed. Only construction of noncombustible materials shall be allowed until the water system is operational. If permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents or third parties. Normal procedure requires that streets needed for access to approved uses shall be paved with a bituminous surface before certificates of occupancy may be issued. However, the City Engineer is authorized to waive this requirement when weather related circumstances prevent completion of street projects before the end of the construction season. The Developer is responsible for maintaining said streets in a condition that will assure the access of emergency vehicles at all times when such a waiver is granted. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. F. The Developer represents to the City, to the best of its knowledge, that the plat is not of "metropolitan significance" and that an environmental impact statement is not required. However, if the City or another governmental entity or agency determines that such a review is needed, that the Developer shall prepare it in compliance with legal requirements so issued from said agency. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all expenses, including staff time and attorney fees, that the City incurs in assisting in the preparation of the review. 12 G. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all City, County, Metropolitan, State and Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow any construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. H. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Agreement, at the Developer's request the City will execute and deliver a release to the Developer. I. Developer shall take out and maintain until six months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury or death shall not be less than $500,000.00 for one person and $1,000,000.00 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall not be less than $200,000.00 for each occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional named insured on said policy, and Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City prior to the City signing the plat. J. The Developer shall obtain a Wetlands Compliance Certificate from the City. K. Upon breach of the terms of this Agreement, the City may, without notice to the Developer, draw down the Developer's cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit as provided in paragraph 26 of this Agreement. The City may draw down this security in the amount of $500.00 per day that the Developer is in violation. The City, in its sole discretion, shall determine whether the Developer is in violation of the Agreement. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 30 hereof, this determination may be made without notice to the Developer. It is stipulated that the violation of any term will result in damages to the City in an amount which will be impractical and extremely difficult to ascertain. It is agreed that the per day sum stipulated is a reasonable amount to compensate the City for its damages. 13 L. The Developer will be required to conduct all major activities to construct Plans A-F during the following hours of operation: Monday - Friday Saturday Sunday 7:00 A.M. until 7:00 P.M. 8:00 A.M. until 5:00 P.M. Not Allowed This does not apply to activities that are required on a 24 hour basis such as dewatering, etc. Any deviation from the above hours are subject to approval of the City Engineer. M. The Developer is responsible to require each builder within the development to provide a Class 5 aggregate entrance for every house that is to be constructed in the development. This entrance is required to be installed upon initial construction of the home. See City Standard Plate No. 362A for construction requirements. N. The Developer shall be responsible for the control of weeds in excess of twelve inches (12") on vacant lots or boulevards within their development as per City Code 6-7-2. Failure to control weeds will be considered a Developer's Default as outlined in Paragraph 30 of this Agreement and the Developer will reimburse the City as defined in said Paragraph 30. 32. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified or registered mail at the following address: Rodney D. Hardy, Vice President Sienna Corporation Suite 608 4940 Viking Drive Minneapolis, MN 55435 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either and delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail or registered mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: John F. Erar, Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 14 OUTLOT C, EAST FARMINGTON THIRD ADDITION EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT APRIL 30, 1997 SCALE : 1 INCH = 60 FEET STREET: L{) <.0 OAK f- f- 0 0 0 t[)...J ...J ...J f- f-l.L. Z 0 00 0 0::: ...Jo::: Cl. W l.L.W Z OZ W 0::: 5 0::: 1 2 ...J 0 0:::0 3 C) 4 U wU z z <( 3: o:::W \ (j)<D OZ \ J Uo wZ ""- (j)<( l- I I _/ W 16 OUTLO'l;/ C I- W 6 w ~ 6\ W ~~ a::: en & l- i ~f.. en 15 (}~ 7 ~ #~ 8;~ JP z # :c ,,4; w /' I- .~ 14 "ANGLE POINT LOT 12 8 Z w a:: w - I- ~I 0:: ~ :::> r- 0 f- 11 10 100 f- 12 9 LL .-...J 13 0 ...J f-l.L. l.L. 00 ...Jo::: 0 l.L.W 0::: OZ W 0::: 0:::0 a::: wu 0 Z U 0:::3: w SPRUCE STREET O(j) U Z 3:~ I z<( James R. Hill, Inc. OUTLOT D, EAST FARMINGTON THIRD ADDITION EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT APRIL 30, 1997 SCALE : 1 INCH = 60 FEET ~ .- .- SPRUCE STREET .- .- 0 0 .....I .- .....I .-lJ... lJ... 00 0 .....10::: 0::: lJ...W w OZ Z . 0::: 0::: 0:::0 0 wU 1 U ~:: 2 3 4 5 oz U Cl to to ::z U)<{ ......... ..... ..... W lLJ I.LI V D 6 w ~ ~ ..... ANGLE POINT LOT 2/"- ..... (f) -.... '~ (f) ~ 15 2 ~o 7 ~~ ~ ~.,t. ~ ~ ~~ <fa ::c ~~ z ~ ..... W - """ 8 z ~ 14 lLJ w ~ ..... - 0::: FE \ 0Cl :::::> to 150 (j) 13 12 11 10 .- 9 (j) -l l.J... 0 .-lJ... .....I 00 lJ... -lo::: 0 lJ...W oZ 0::: 0::: 0:::0 Z wu 0::: Z 0 o:::w WALNUT STREET ~ or.n Uo z wz z<{ James R. Hill, Inc. OUTLOT E, EAST FARMINGTON THIRD ADDITION EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT APRIL 30, 1997 SCALE : 1 INCH = 60 FEET SPRUCE STREET 6 7 8 5 ({) ({) I- 4 w I- / <D W W /- 9 0::: W / I- / ~ ~~~ en CJV (f) 3 ~ ~~~. ~CJ ~~ ------------- ------ (j~ ~~ 3 ~~~~ 10 :c ~ I- / Z / 6 " OUTLOT E w ~ 2 w l- lL. 11 0::: ...J - ~ :c l- t- 6 14 13 1 12 WALNUT STREET James R. Hill, Inc. OUTLOT F, EAST FARMINGTON THIRD ADDITION EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT APRIL 30, 1997 SCALE : 1 INCH = 60 FEET OAK STREET .1 2 3 14 5 I- LaJ ~\ OUTLOT F LaJ Ck: I- \ 4 (f) "- 6 ~~ ---------- ------ 13 ~~ .e9~ J: '1.s-lo-.r F I- ~.e <10 l.L.. Z ....J ~.?> ~ 7 LaJ ~ 12 ~~ <0 ~ - "" I- Ck: - 11 <0 <.D F 10 9 8 6 4 6 SPRUCE STREET James R. Hill, Inc. OUTLOT I, EAST FARMINGTON THIRD ADDITION EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT . APRIL 30, 1997 SCALE : 1 INCH = 60 FEET OAK STREET ,--- I 6 3 I 1 2 6 I I- W I w 4 a:::: I I- 6 U) I OUTLOT I / / l- I ~~ 5 w " ------ --------- w I ~~ 5 :I: a:::: (}~ l- I- I ~# l.L Ul 8;(j J3 ~ I ~ w ~ 3: .CO co ./ 6 ./ I- :I: I- Z 7 ~ 10 9 8 w -1 W SPRUCE STREET James R. Hill, Inc. OUTLOT J, EAST FARMINGTON THIRD ADDITION EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT APRIL 30, 1997 SCALE : 1 INCH = 60 FEET SPRUCE STREET 1 2 3 t- <.0 <.0 , 5 l- I - w ""- w "~ W L.tJ ~ I ~ a:::: ~Q I- en I ~~ 6 6 en ~C). ~ I ~ '1'~ ------ ----------- -- ~~ :c I ~ I- J ""-, 6 I OUTLOT z ~ w 7 > I lL. W ....J .....J I ~ W 6 I 10 9 I- 8 I L___ 6 WALNUT STREET James R. Hill, Inc. 5h FROM: Mayor and City Council City Administrator f1- Robin Roland, Finance Director TO: SUBJECT: 1996 Snow Removal Reimbursement DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION Due to significantly higher snowfall through the winter of 1996, many counties in the State were declared disaster areas and qualified for aid from the State for their snowplowing costs. DISCUSSION In January 1997, staff submitted to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, budgeted and actual costs for snow removal for 1993-1997. The State responded with a snow removal reimbursement of $5,009. BUDGET IMPACT This is $5,009 of unanticipated revenue for the 1997 budget year. ACTION REQUESTED This is for information only. ~)#J , Robin Roland Finance Director CitlJ of FarminiJ.ton 325 Oak Street. FarminfJton, MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7111 · FaJr (612) ~63.2591 5i FROM: Mayor, Council and City Administrator~ Mary Hanson, Clerk Typist TO: SUBJECT: Lawful Gambling Premise Permit - American Legion Post 189 DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION/DISCUSSION Minnesota Statutes require organizations applying for a gambling premise permit to receive approval from the jurisdiction where the activity occurs. The American Legion Club Post 189 has requested Council approval to conduct gambling activities at their facility located at 10 North 8th Street. ACTION REQUIRED Adopt a resolution approving the gambling premise permit for the American Legion Club Post 189. Respectfully submitted, " mh3 CitlJ. of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street. FarminfJtonl MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · FaJf (612) 463.2591 PRO P 0 SED RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISE PERMIT - AMERICAN LEGION CLUB POST 189- Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 2nd day of June, 1997 at 7:00 P.M.. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, pursuant to M.S. 349.213, the State of Minnesota Gambling Board may not issue or renew a Gambling Premise Permit unless the City Council adopts a resolution approving said permit; and WHEREAS, Farmington American Legion Club Post 189 has submitted an application for a Gambling Premise Permit to conduct bingo at their facility located at 10 North 8th Street for Council consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Farmington City Council that the Gambling Premise Permit for Farmington American Legion Club Post 189 is hereby approved. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 2nd day of June, 1997. Mayor Attested to the ____ day of June, 1997. SEAL Clerk/Administrator TO: Mayor, Counc,~.J1bers and City Administrator / 5j FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Request from Jay Christianson to Farm Wenzel Property Acquired for the Central Maintenance Facility DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION The City has acquired a portion of the Wenzel property in the southeast quadrant of 195th Street and the proposed Pilot Knob Road re-alignment for the future Central Maintenance Facility. The new water reservoir will also be constructed on this site. DISCUSSION Jay Christianson is the farmer who has rented the Wenzel property in the past. Mr. Christianson approached the City and asked if he could rent the property not involved with the water reservoir construction from the City for farming purposes. The timing of the Pilot Knob Road project would also need to be factored into the farmable area. BUDGET IMPACT Mr. Christianson informed staff that he has rented Wenzel's property in the past for $65 per acre. Of the land acquired, approximately 20 acres could be farmed, leaving out the area needed for the water reservoir construction. The rent for the land would be $1300 based on $65/acre. RECOMMENDATION 1. Staff recommends that the Council make a motion to allow Mr. Christianson to farm the City property discussed in 1997, contingent on the schedule of the contractor for the water reservoir construction. If the contractor's schedule for the growing season includes tower erection, allowing Mr. Christianson to farm is not recommended. If Mr. Christianson is allowed to farm based on the schedule, those areas needed for reservoir construction and Pilot Knob Road construction would be excepted from the area Mr. Christianson would be allowed to farm. 2. Staff recommends that the rent be set at $65/acre for 1997. 3. That the City attorney prepare a lease incorporating the above terms. Respectfully submitted, ~m~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Citlj of FarminiJ.ton 325 Oak Street - Farminljtonl MN 550211- (612) 1I63.7111 - Fax (612) 1I63.2591 COUNCIL REGISTER Council Meeting on 6/2/97 VENDOR ACTIVITY 29-MAY-1997 (12:00) DESCRIPTION 5k CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYS ABH PROPERTIES ~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <*> ADS ENVIORNMENTAL SERVICES INC <*> AIRLAKE FORD MERCURY <*> AIRTOUCH CELLULAR <*> AL I S LOCK AND KEY <*> ALCORN BEVERAGE CO. INC. <*> ANDRING, DOUG & OLGA <*> APPLE VALLEY, CITY OF <*> AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES <*> Aspenwa11 Tree Service, Inc. <*> B & B PIZZA <*> BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK IN <*> BRIMEYER GROUP INC <*> BROCK WHITE COMPANY, LLC. <*> BT OFFICE PRODUCTS INTERNATION <*> BUDGET OIL CO <*> BURNSVILLE SANITARY COMPANY <*> CAMAS <*> CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT <*> CHRIS, TREVIS <*> CITY OF FARMINGTON - SELECT AC <*> CKRJ WELDING <*> CLINE, GEOFFREY SEWER OPEATIONS SOLID WASTE STREET MAINT SEWER OPEATIONS PARK MAINT STREET MAINT BUILDING INSPECT POLICE ADMIN BUILDING INSPECT LIQUOR SEWER OPERATIONS COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING MAINT TREE MAINTENANCE SOLID WASTE ENGINEERING SERV liRA/ECONOMIC DEV STREET MAINT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING INSPECT ENGINEERING SERV FIRE SERVICES PARK MAINT PATROL SERVICES SOLID WASTE STREET MAINT SOLID WASTE STREET MAINT STREET MAINT SEWER OPERATIONS GENERAL FUND FIRE SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS JUNE '97 BLDG RENTAL JUNE'97 BLDG RENTAL JUNE'97 BLDG RENTAL BATTERY PACKS PARTS PARTS CELL PHONE - DAVE OLSON CELLULAR PHONE - SQUAD 931 SUPPLIES BEER 18890 ENGLISH AVE - FINAL BILL LEGAL TIME - JOINT POWERS AGRM PAGER SERVICE REMOVAL OF DEBRIS-PILOT KNOB CLEAN UP DAY PROF. SERVICES MARCH '97 COMM DEV DIR SEARCH EXPENSES ROAD SEALANT SUPPLIES FUEL CHARGES FUEL CHARGES FUEL CHARGES FUEL CHARGES FUEL CHARGES FUEL CHARGES FUEL CHARGES DUMPING FEES CL-5 SAND & GRAVEL SUPPLIES 602 CENTENNIAL DR - FINAL BILL WITHHOLDING 5/23/97 ALUM PUMP CAN HOLDERS 18241 EMBER AVE - FINAL BILL 100.00 1,500.00 290.00 1,890.00* 420.00 420.00* 75.70 42.02 117.72* 58.76 159.60 218.36* 60.00 60.00* 12,222.90 12,222.90* 97.46 97.46* 117.18 117.18* 1. 08 1.08* 900.00 900.00* 133.98 133.98* 7,260.15 7,260.15* 370.78 370.78* 2,567.98 2,567.98* 529.84 529.84* 126.55 33.00 46.50 226.71 223.62 515.40 375.57 1,547.35* 14,591. 61 14,591.61* 798.89 798.89* 49.46 49.46* 53.88 53.88* 1,005.80 1,005.80* 272.42 272.42* 74.96 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH COUNCIL REGISTER VENDOR <*> COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC <*> COMM CENTER <*> COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MINNESOTA I <*> CONNELLY, RAY <*> COPY SALES INC <*> DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SERVIC <*> DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION <*> DEILKE, ANN <*> DELGARD TOOL CO <*> DIESEL COMPONENTS INC <*> DUEBERS DEPT STORE <*> DUNHAM , LEONARD <*> ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATI <*> ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC. <*> ERAR, JOHN <*> FANNYHILL DINNER THEATRE <*> FARMINGTON BAKERY <*> FARMINGTON EMPLOYEE CLUB <*> FARMINGTON INDEPENDENT <*> FARMINGTON PRINTING INC <*> FEDERAL EXPRESS <*> FEDERAL RESERVE BANK <*> FINSTUEN, KAREN <*> FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FARMING <*> FRITZ COMPANY INC <*> FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS <*> ACTIVITY LIQUOR ENGINEERING SERV LIQUOR PRAIRIE WAT PH 2 FIRE SERVICES GENERAL FUND EMERG MGMT SERV SIGNAL MAINT SEWER OPERATIONS SOLID WASTE STREET MAINT BUILDING MAINT PRAIRIE WAT PH 2 COMM DEVELOP LIQUOR PILOT KNB ADMINISTRATION Senior Center Senior Center GENERAL FUND ADMINISTRATION STATE AID STREET ADMINISTRATION STATE AID STREET GENERAL FUND ADMINISTRATION GENERAL FUND LIQUOR ADMINISTRATION 29-MAY-1997 (12:00) DESCRIPTION BEER INSTALL RADIO PO#6552 QUARTERLY MEMBERSHIP PRAIRIE WTRWY EMMINENT DOMAIN QUARTERLY COPIER MAINT. AGREEM CHILD SUPPORT WH 5/23/97 SIREN-PILOT KNOB RD STREET LIGHTS - 9TH STREET 5332 W 180TH ST - FINAL BILL WELDING SET PARTS RETURN CONTACT PAPER PRAIRIE WTRWY EMMINENT DOMAIN '97 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL REMODEL BURGLAR ALARM CRAGUNS EXP. REIMB. DINNER THEATRE GROUP ASST ROLLS EMPLOYEE CLUB WH 5/23/97 PINE RIDGE FOR PLT/ORDINANCE PUBLIC HEARING ADS 11 X 17 PAPER FED EX CHGS - ASTECH ASPHALT SAVINGS BOND W/H 5/23/97 MILEAGE FED/ST/FlCA WH 5/23/97 CIGARETTES/SUPPLIES PHONE SERVICE - MAY CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYS 74.96* 16,757.35 16,757.35* 658.80 658.80* 109.88 109.88* 3,698.00 3,698.00* 65.31 65.31* 319.50 319.50* 5.33 2,061.66 2,066.99* 4.83 4.83* 218.83 218.83* 11.48 11.48* 5.73 5.73* 3,090.72 3,090.72* 160.00 160.00* 764.07 764.07* 321. 97 321. 97* 279.50 279.50* 6.00 6.00* 42.00 42.00* 122.85 29.70 152.55* 47.09 47.09* 24.74 24.74* 25.00 25.00* 79.26 79.26* 21,045.60 21,045.60* 812.49 812.49* 70.72 70.72* vii OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH H OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH COUNCIL REGISTER VENDOR ACTIVITY 29-MAY-1997 (12:00) DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GODFREY'S CUSTOM SIGNS <*> GOODIN COMPANY <*> GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC <*> GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE <*> GRIGGS COOPER & CO <*> Gartner Refrigeration & MFG In <*> HAYES, DON <*> ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 <*> IKON CAPITAL <*> INTERNATIONAL CHAPTER OF BUILD <*> Independent Black Dirt Co. Inc <*> JIM HATCH SALES CO <*> JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPAN <*> JURAN & MOODY <*> KLINEFELTER, GREG <*> KRECH, JOHN & LORI <*> KWIK TRIP <*> LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES INC <*> LAKEVILLE, CITY OF <*> LAMPERTS <*> LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES <*> LAWRENCE, GARY R. <*> LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES - P LIQUOR PILOT KNB BUILDING MAINT SEWER OPEATIONS WATER UTILITY BUILDING INSPECT LIQUOR ICE ARENA SEWER OPERATIONS GENERAL FUND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING INSPECT PARK MAINT STREET MAINT STREET MAINT LIQUOR CHINESE REST EAGLES PROJECT SEWER OPERATIONS SEWER OPERATIONS FIRE SERVICES PARK MAINT PATROL SERVICES SEWER OPEATIONS SNOW REMOVAL STREET MAINT WATER UTILITY PERSONNEL FIRE SERVICES PATROL SERVICES FIRE SERVICES GENERAL FUND FIRE SERVICES ADMINISTRATION SIGN - PILOT KNOB STORE PARTS/SUPPLIES APRIL SERVICE APRIL SERVICE BUILDING CODE SEMINAR LIQUOR PARTS/REPAIRS 609 LINDEN ST - FINAL BILLING DEF. COMP WH 5/23/97 MINOLTA RENTAL 1997 MEMBERSHIP DUES 4 YRDS BLK DIRT 4 YDS DIRT SUPPLIES/TOOLS LIQUOR TAX INCREMENT PLANS TAX INCREMENT PLANS 11 SPRUCE ST - FINAL BILLING 5378 W 193RD ST - FINAL BILL. DBL PAYMENT ON ACCOU PER GALLON DISC JAN' FUEL CHARGES - POLIC FUEL CHARGES FEBRUARY FUEL CHARGE PER GALLON DISC JAN' PER GALLON DISC JAN' APRIL SERVICES RENDERED APRIL DISPATCH CHARGES APRIL DISPATCH CHARGES INVOICE #417-CREDIT INCORRECT LAW ENF. UNION DUES WH 5/23/97 EXPENSE REIMB - EAST GRAND FRK FULL-CONF. - ERAR 90.00 90.00* 148.06 148.06* 336.00 336.00 672.00* 70.00 70.00* 8,504.68 8,504.68* 82.34 82.34* 89.46 89.46* 2,908.90 2,908.90* 287.89 287.89* 45.00 45.00* 40.00 40.00 80.00* 162.52 162.52* 5,128.22 5,128.22* 1,500.00 1,500.00 3,000.00* 70.89 70.89* 34.66 34.66* 16.26 151. 26 340.83 27.83 700.47 -500.04 368.43 1,105.04* 610.50 610.50* 1,414.03 2,828.08 4,242.11* 36.83 36.83* 148.50 148.50* 93.59 93.59* 265.00 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH ("It.f lJrt OH COUNCIL REGISTER VENDOR LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES - P <*> LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS <*> MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT <*> MARQUETTE BANK - LAKEVILLE <*> MARTINELLI, LOUIS <*> MCKENZIE, ROBERT <*> METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIORNME <*> METROPOLITAN COUNCIL-SAC <*> MILLER, SUE <*> MINNESOTA AFSCME COUNCIL #14 <*> MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOCIATION <*> MINNESOTA MUTUAL <*> MINNESOTA POOLS <*> MN CITY/COUNTY MGMT ASSN. <*> MN MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE ASSN INC <*> MORE FOUR <*> MVTL LABORATORIES INC <*> NATROGAS, INC. <*> NELSON RADIO COMMUNICATIONS <*> NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY <*> NORTON, LINDA K <*> NRG ENERGY INC <*> NTFC CAPITAL CORPORATION <*> OFFICE MAX <*> OLSON, DAVID <*> ACTIVITY COMM DEVELOP LEGISLATIVE CTRL SEVERANCE FUND SOLID WASTE CAPITAL ACQUIS SENIOR CITIZEN PRAIRIE WAT PH 2 SEWER OPEATIONS SEWER OPERATIONS BUILDING INSPECT GENERAL FUND GENERAL FUND SEVERANCE FUND SWIMMING POOL ADMINISTRATION LIQUOR ENGINEERING SERV POLICE ADMIN SENIOR CITIZEN SOLID WASTE STREET MAINT WATER UTILITY STREET MAINT RESCUE SQUAD BUILDING MAINT PERSONNEL SOLID WASTE ADMINISTRATION FIRE SERVICES COMM DEVELOP 29-MAY-1997 (12: 00) DESCRIPTION FULL-CONF. - OLSON MINI-CONF. - STRACHAN 1996 PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT PARTS/SUPPLIES CERTIFICATE OF INDEBTEDNESS WRITING WORKSHOP PRAIRIE WTRWY EMMINENT DOMAIN JUNE SEWER SERVICE APRIL SAC CHARGES MILEAGE/LUNCH UNION DUES WH 5/23/97 WH 5/23/97 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM PARTS/SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL ANNUAL DUES FILM FILM SUPPLIES CLEAN UP DAY CASCADE PWDR WATER TEST NATROGAS RESCUE SQUAD SIREN REPAIR 325 OAK STREET CONSULTING SERVICES - MAY RESOURCE RECOVERY FEES - APRIL CALLER ID PH SYS PYMT INSTALL. SUPPLIES MILEAGE/MEAL EXP REIMB 5/97 CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYS 265.00 125.00 655.00* 1,438.00 1,438.00* 1,143.50 1,143.50* 28,855.89 28,855.89* 500.00 500.00* 3,090.72 3,090.72* 33,542.00 33,542.00* 43,263.00 43,263.00* 30.27 30.27* 391. 70 391. 70* 278.63 278.63* 208.80 208.80* 246.50 246.50* 60.00 60.00* 440.00 440.00* 9.56 11.79 24.57 116.61 8.18 170.71* 24.00 24.00* 260.93 260.93* 187.00 187.00* 2,837.40 2,837.40* 400.00 400.00* 1,302.74 1,302.74* 422.91 422.91* 119.25 119.25* 68.62 68.62* OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH COUNCIL REGISTER VENDOR ACTIVITY 29-MAY-1997 (12:00) DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PEOPLES NATURAL GAS <*> PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC <*> PHILLIPS, MICHELLE <*> PRATER, MARTIN <*> PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS <*> PUELSTON, CHARLOTTE <*> QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS CO <*> RAYFO INC <*> RECREONICS INC ETAL <*> RENT 'N' SAVE PROTABLE SERVICE <*> ROBERTS COMPANY INC <*> ROBERTS, DR. RICHARD <*> ROCHESTER FAMILY MEDICINE CLIN <*> S & S WORLDWIDE <*> SAUBER PLUMBING & HEATING <*> SCHARBER & SONS <*> SCHMIDTKE FUELS INC <*> SCHMITTY & SONS SCHOOL BUSES <*> SKB <*> SKILLPATH SEMINARS <*> SNYDER, STEVE <*> SPElKER, MARILYN <*> ST CROIX COUNTY <*> ST PAUL OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAI <*> FIRE SERVICES HRA/ECONOMIC DEV LIQUOR PARK MAINT SOLID WASTE STREET MAINT SWIMMING POOL WATER UTILITY LIQUOR GENERAL FUND SEWER OPERATIONS GENERAL FUND SWIMMING POOL LIQUOR SOLID WASTE SWIMMING POOL PARK MAINT POLICE ADMIN SEWER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL RECREATION PROGR STREET MAINT PARK MAINT SOLID WASTE Senior Center SOLID WASTE RECREATION PROGR FIRE SERVICES BUILDING MAINT GENERAL FUND ADMINISTRATION 21625 DENMARK AVE - FIRE 308 ELM ST 18320 PILOT KNOB ROAD 617 6TH STREET 3360 220TH ST W #2 706 1ST ST 626 HERITAGE WAY 311-1/2 OAK STREET WINE REFUND FOR SWIMMING LESSONS 303 PINE ST- FINAL BILLING PERA WH & EMPLR SHARE 5/23/97 SWIMMING LESSON REFUND LIQUOR PARTS/SUPPLIES PO#6504 COMM. SAFETY POOL STEP PORTABLE RENTAL MUG 18303 EXODUS COURT-FINAL BILL DRUG TEST - OLSON CRAFT/REC SUPPLIES PARTS/SUPPLIES SKID LOADER PO#7125 SUPPLIES PLYMOUTH PLAYHOUSE TRIP DUMPING FEES GRAMMAR & USAGE SEMINAR EXP REIMB- EAST GRAND FORKS SUPPLIES CHILD SUPPORT WH 5/23/97 MIANTENANCE AGREEMENTS 213 . 86 76.85 37.32 128.44 25.51 259.00 20.24 54.40 815.62* 3,912.74 3,912.74* 50.00 50.00* 225.18 225.18* 8,619.75 8,619.75* 25.00 25.00* 1,440.33 1,440.33* 199.98 199.98* 88.79 88.79* 393.48 393.48* 25.96 25.96* 16.97 16.97* 25.00 25.00* 312.33 312.33* 6.90 6.90* 30,744.42 30,744.42* 274.13 274.13* 215.00 215.00* 471.00 471.00* 125.00 125.00* 23.94 23.94* 11. 68 11.68* 141.20 141.20* 534.00 534.00* OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH COUNCIL REGISTER VENDOR ST PAUL, CITY OF <*> STAR TRIBUNE <*> STARR AUTOMOTIVE <*> STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNION <*> STERLING CODIFIERS INC <*> T C CONSTRUCTION <*> THISWEEK NEWSPAPERS <*> TIGER TOTS/COOL KIDS <*> TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY <*> TRANS ALARM INC <*> UNIFORMS UNLIMITED <*> UNITED WAY FUND OF ST. PAUL AR <*> UNITOG <*> VOSS, MARK <*> WALSH, PAUL AND MARY <*> WENDLAND DISTRIBUTING INC <*> WEST WELD <*> XERGON <*> Approval: Ristow Gamer Strachan Fitch ACTIVITY STREET MAINT PERSONNEL BUILDING INSPECT GENERAL FUND ADMINISTRATION ESCROW FUND TREE MAINTENANCE LARCH STREET PERSONNEL STATE AID STREET GENERAL FUND SOLID WASTE ICE ARENA SEWER OPEATIONS SWIMMING POOL WATER UTILITY PATROL SERVICES GENERAL FUND FLEET MAINT SERV SOLID WASTE STREET MAINT WATER UTILITY SEWER OPERATIONS PARK MAINT SOLID WASTE FLEET MAINT SERV FLEET MAINT SERV STREET MAINT Cordes 29-MAY-1997 (12: 00) DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT CK-SUBSYS ASPHALT MIX EMPLOYMENT ADS OIL CHANGE 5/23/97 WITHHOLDING SUPPLEMENT #145 REFUND DBL PYMT ON INV 47&FA-8 TREES FOR DEVELOPMENTS CLASSIFIED ADS CLASSIFIED ADS CLASSIFIED ADS REFUND FOR OVERPAYMENT CYLINDER RENTAL ANNUAL INSPECTION MONITORING SERVICE/REPORT SERV ANNUAL INSPECTION/MTHLY CHGS MONITORING SERVICE/REPORT SERV UNIFORMS UNITED WAY WH 5/23/97 UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 18928 ENGLEWOOD WAY-FINAL BILL JUNE'97 BUILDING RENTAL RIVETS MIG WELDER DRILL BITS DRILL BITS 164.93 164.93* 480.00 480.00* 25.73 25.73* 1,596.33 1,596.33* 1,686.30 1,686.30* 274.25 1,000.00 1,274.25* 98.17 96.55 77 .86 272.58* 300.00 300.00* 40.85 40.85* 83.07 109.56 105.28 23.04 320.95* 171. 70 171. 70* 29.00 29.00* 20.19 60.51 115.79 5.23 201.72* 15.85 15.85* 180.00 180.00* 22.39 22.39* 2,816.93 2,816.93* 120.41 13 .91 134.32* 302,121.20* OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH ~H OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH <*> foa FROM: Mayor, counCilmemb~.r, , City Administrator~ J Lee M. MaIln, P.E. City Engineer TO: SUBJECT: Henderson Area Storm Sewer Public Hearing DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION At the May 19, 1997 Council meeting, the Council continued the public hearing for the Henderson Area Storm Sewer Project. There was a typographical error on the public hearing notices and corrected notices were sent out in order to ensure the statutory requirements of MS 429 were met. The continued hearing of May 19th and the public hearing set by the corrected notices will run concurrently. DISCUSSION The construction of storm sewer in the Henderson area would help alleviate drainage and groundwater problems that have been identified in Farmington's 1993 Facilities Plan. The following points should be considered when discussing this proposed project. . Currently, this area has large areas of overland flow, high groundwater, and no storm sewer. The lack of an adequate drainage system contributes to street deterioration and presents safety concerns with ponding and ice, especially at the low area on Hickory between 7th and 8th Streets. . The storm sewer proposed would be constructed between 7th and lOth Streets, generally along the alignment of Hickory Street. This alignment is the most cost effective solution for addressing drainage and groundwater issues in the project area. The low point on Hickory Street between 7th and 8th Streets cannot be drained to the ditch on TrUIlk Highway 3 because the ditch on Trunk Highway 3 is higher than the low point on Hickory Street. . The question has been raised as to why residents along 10th Street were not assessed when catch basins on 10th and Hickory were installed. Further research has revealed that the cost of these improvements did not equal 20% or more of the total project cost of the prairie Waterway, of which these improvements were a part. Under MS 429, at least 20% of the project cost needs to be assessed. Since the catch basins did not equal 20% of the total project cost, the City could not legally assess the costs. . In order for MnDOT to participate in the project, they will need to receive plans for the improvements for review by the end of June. As stated in the feasibility study, the project should not go forward without MnDOT participation. CitlJ. of FarminfJ.ton 325 Oak Street · FarminfJton, MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Falf (612) 463.2591 BUDGET IMPACT The estimated total project cost is $397,900. Per the City's assessment policy, lOot of the lateral storm sewer costs would be assessed against benefiting properties. The estimated assessment for residential property is $1,530 per buildable lot. The estimated assessment for commercial and multi family property, and MnDOT right of way is $6,570 per acre. A breakdown of project costs and assessments is below: Project Cost Breakdown Item Total Cost Assessed City MnDOT* Trunk Storm Sewer Lateral Storm Sewer Easement Acquisition/Est. Testing/Crew Costs $263,900 111,200 $ 91,200 20,000 2,800 $216,400 $ 47,500 20,000 20,000 2,800 $397,900 $ 91,200 $239,200 $ 67,500 * MnDOT's estimated share is based on the drainage area of TH3 benefiting from the improvements, calculated per their cost sharing procedures, which comes to ~8t of the total storm sewer cost. An appraiser was contracted to determine value increases to properties provided with storm sewer improvements. The proposed assessments are within the value increase determined by the appraiser. The costs identified to be assessed would be assessed over a 10 to 15 year period. The City's share of costs would be funded by the Storm Water Utility Fund which was established in 1990 for the purpose of maintaining and/or constructing storm sewer improvements in existing areas of Farmington. RECOMMENDATION 1. Council should decide whether or not to proceed with the project. 2. If the project is to proceed, adopt a resolution ordering the project and authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications. Respectfully submitted, ~ In ~~ ~ Lee MaIln Interim City Engineer LM1 Proposed RESOLUTION NO. R -97 ORDER PROJECT AUTHORIZE PREP ARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT NO. 96-2 - HENDERSON AREA STORM SEWER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 2nd day of June, 1997 at 7 :00 P.M.. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, pursuantto Resolution No. R52-97, the City Council accepted the feasibility report presented by the City Engineer and set a public hearing to discuss the following proposed improvements: Project 96-2 Description Storm Sewer Improvements Location Henderson Area ;and WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S. Chapter 429; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VEDthat: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed. 2. Lee M. Mann is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 2nddayofJune, 1997. Mayor Attested to the day of ,1997. Clerk! Administrator SEAL 65 0b TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator ~ FROM: Lee Smick, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Vacating Portion of Main Street and Alley - Eagle's Site Plan DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION The proposed vacation is located in Block 25, Lots, 1,2 and 3 and Block 28, Lot 6 where the Eagle's Club building is proposed. The vacation includes Main Street and the alley to the north. DISCUSSION The Eagle's Club proposes to construct a parking lot over the proposed vacation of Main Street and the alley to the north. It is no longer in the interest of the City to maintain both the aforementioned street and alley subject to the reservation of public utility easements over, under and across the vacated street and alley. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the proposed vacation of Main Street and th~ alley to the north. ACTION REQUIRED Adopt a resolution approving the vacation of Main Street and the alley to the north subject to the reservation of public utility easements over, under and across the vacated street and alley. Respectfully submitted, G?-~ Lee Smick -:;Jt:f Planning Coordinator Citl} of FarminlJton 325 Oak Street. FarminiJtonJ MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7111 · Fax (612) ~63.2591 PRO P 0 SED RESOLUTION VACATING A PUBLIC STREET AND ALLEY IN THE TOWN OF FARMINGTON Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 2nd day of June, 1997 at 7:00 P.M.. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, the City Council has received a request to vacate the following described public street and alley: All that part of Main Street as platted in the Town of Farmington, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota which lies between Block 25 and Block 28, which lies easterly of the easterly right of way line of the Soo Line Railroad, and which lies westerly line of Third Street. ALSO All that part of the alley located in Block 28 as platted in the Town of Farmington, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, which lies between Lot 6 and Lots 7 and 8, which lies easterly of the easterly right of way line of the Soo Line Railroad, and which lies westerly of the westerly line of Third Street and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 2, 1997 to consider the vacation of said street and alley after proper publication and notification, at which time public comment was heard thereon; and WHEREAS, it is determined that said street and alley are no longer necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above described public street and alley are hereby vacated subject to reservation of public utility easements over, under and across said vacated street and alley. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 2nd day of June, 1997. Mayor Attested to the day of June, 1997. City Administrator FROM: Mayor, counCil~ Mers City Administrator Lee M. Mann, P. ., Director of Public Works/City Engineer G TO: SUBJECT: Project 95-6, New Water Reservoir DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION Bids for the 1.5 Million Gallon Elevated Water Storage Tank were taken on Thursday, May 29, 1997. Three bids for this project were received. DISCUSSION The Water Board approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to proceed with the advertisement for bids for this project at the April 28, 1997 meeting. Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. submitted the low bid in the amount of $1,539,000 (Base bid plus alternates). The Water Board has elected to include the alternate bid items with the project. The alternates include a garage door, a concrete floor for the inside of the Tower and and a condensate ceiling inside the Tower. These alternate items will allow for storage of equipment in the Tower. The estimated construction cost presented to the Council in the Capital Improvement Plan on March 17, 1997 was $1,801,000. BUDGET IMPACT The total estimated cost of the project including contingencies, and engineering, legal and administration costs is $2,118,500. The City has issued $2,140,000 in bonds that will be retired over a seventeen (17) year period with funds from the Water Board generated through user fees. RECOMMENDATION Accept the bid of Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. for $1,539,000 and award the contract by resolution. Respectfully submitted, ~/?1~ Lee M. Mann, P .E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer CitlJ. of FarminiJton 325 Oak Street · FarminfJton, MN 55024 · (612) 463-7111 · Fax (612) 463-2591 ~. Pro'cctName 1.5 AndIIa Pro'eel No, 95-6 , Bid nin 2:00 Gallon Elevared Wiler Slom Tank C.D.s,T. Tbul'lda t Ma 29 1997 '; :, I It."" c:.11#fJ IIttu llai'f ;, l1li U4c:t .1 ,.prtNIuctIoII t1/ fridI "CiIIYtd .\ , :: ~T.uULATlON :1 ;1 TabulaDoD of nne Low Bida of 11no lttcol~ ~t ,I ., ij ;! ~t 'f q No. Iteaa PIra I. J.I Me;......~. .,..,.... Water,....I46'..... ::, ___ w.. t...a :; PIImR............ ........... ....... vt die......... Clt ~ dMtp wIdIi 1.500,000..........,... "2'06" of lilt ...... WIlIr e.wa. MI Me.. . pre....... aIDIIlIII '11 .1111..6: plIt ~ lMIrkw.... ....... ......, ....... ~.... ...................... ..an.....-..... aD...... .... ....... .; ~ ; . .. . ~ .' Put 2..... W. I I"~'" __....lIlIpH1i1 2 TapIlIII S_ - . MWDOT 3177 A :; 3 SMdIII' M8IDOT 3116. ...... 'H>> 4 a.. S........... 5 a..IIrtlB 'A...-U 1 2"1lbu,**... . I.11r ........... ... , In ClII............. 10 RaIne IIIddllpete of bihIIalneua 11 .............. 12 24.alr............ I:J I r valvo ......,aa 14 Ir DIP ...... 15 ~. ~ ~ IMICWIl " ~. DIP....... ... ........ 17 24. I 304" CftlII, ......... ..-....a .1 2ot. a lr ftducer. ...... ... ninIl:aII 19 2ot" DIP 20 12" DIP 21 '" DIP 1.11IBT.WB2 UDlt 0tY. 1.1 1 us 1 CY 1,,200 AC 4 TN 500 TN 1.650 m I" TM 20 TN IS 11 50 BY 60 EA 2 BA 1 SA 1 1.8 1 SA I LP 30 BA , EA :I LP 100" LP JO ur 10 .. No.1 I'llt~o. M....1ac. BhlN..2 CeId1reII TIUIkIw lac. U.. Prtce Total S2AOO 00 S'I.oo $6ClQ.lll) SIG.GO '7.30 'IG.GD 1100.00 ,.OO.tlO .1UO . ao..oo '&1.000.00 S5ClUG sa.oo S100m S2,aDQ.00 -.00 "'.000 eo 11,500.00 ~ ..00 m.tlD '1.33U95.00 12.000.00 SI.4OO.oo $2,8.00 15.000 GO Sl2.3'7S.oo $IS.ooo.oo $~aao.CIO $1.301).00 $500.00 $6OO.Qb t2.000.oo 1500.00 uoo.oo $'700.00 $1.000.00 SI.800.oo S4.OOO.00 13.000.00 S62,64O 00 11.200.00 1250.00 "1 u* PrIce ToW 12.300.00 suo txlO.OO 111.00 suo '11.00 $110.00 S13OJX) St2.00 SIO.GO 11,10a.00 S&CIO.oo S6OO.oo SIOD.oo SUOO.oo S70.00 $4AOO.OO 11,'700.00 moo S4O.DO SJUO Sl~OOO.oo $UOOJ)O ".600.GO $2,I0O.0O S5,5OO.DO $11,2UO.oo ,'6JOQ.oo $'UOO.OO JJ.IOO.OO HOCI,OO ~ $2.200.00 seoo.oo S6OO.DO $100.00 $2,200.00 S2,loo.oo 1'.400.00 13,400 00 mJllO.oo SI.2OO.oo $300.00 ISdN.., Brvwa Steel C lue. Val. Prlee Total $2.000.00 $7.00 MClO.CIO SIOJlO &'7.50 IID.OO SlOll.OO $100.00 $10.00 StUD 11,000.00 1500.00 HOO.oo S1OO.oo 12.000.00 $60.00 I',CICIO.oo SI.500.00 165.00 ~ 125.00 '1,13O,61S.OC $1,000.01 ......01 $Z.4IIU)l SS,mo,Ol $12.J7',O ,u.ooo.o $2.OIlO..O 51.500.0 ssoo.o $600.0 $2.000.0 S5OO.0 SMG.O $'700.0 S2.OlIDAI SI.1OlUI 1'.000.0 SS,OOII.D S67.1liO.ll 11.200.D $25O.C .! . .i .! 21 24. a ,." .. 23 U..I2"_ )4 )4. a'''. 25 U" I ,. nducer 26 ""INIIIdIJ.va _ boa r1 I~"........' VII.. __ 21 12" MJ a, 29 ,-.,... 30 ".... 'Wll'll1Ild _a 31 I"~_'" 32 IS" ocr ......... 33 Ilk__ 34 Ha1'" dltllll bIaafat T'" Put 2. -lUte W-.. ~ ; ., :~ .. :j :j ,. ; ;~ :, 'f .1 ~i :, H .. 'j ~i' :j ~; TQtII PI&t 1 - tJ MCJ W_ TGWIr ,... .... 2 - SI. Wotk T.w ... aid ., ;1 AhInIIet .... . 1 35 PInliIIl.... -.u . 14'..0' II If -0" .... doar door....... ., ... ....... 3'.0" . ~ ........ cIDoII A..1ddItieII or III r ..... .......... .\ I !l A!IINIII N.. J i! t 36 PImiIJIIDd..... 0C/IIIIIIIlI aDlldIIllMll; ceiIIIlI.1J*i1ltd :i .! ., .l:IM.. He. s 11 37 ....1Ild........ alIICIMa 1IDIlr_~ .,...... ulpeciW II ........ II 'I :1 ~............ .... ~ .... u.M.... ............ :; AcId. Ded-=t tD 1M ... BId dlIlIIIIt. 31 torr. . r .,...............,. ......................... J6l.~ .. dII.-J IIlIIl pili... '; .1 . :i 4: a., +-_ ;1 JIIaIe 3" ~1 ., .; ".. ~:::t= :1 i ., 1417'BT.W.~ . , ~~ :! .j ~ KA RA 14 ItA IV. I'.A 1!4 2A SA lJI IA loP II u u 1.1 11 . . I 2 5 2 I 4 2 eo 2 '700 30 "-'00 DO 12.'7aO.00 h,'7GO.OO S2,CX1Q.00 13.10000 suoo.oo $1SO.GG $1,43Q..OO wa.oo GOJID SI2S.m S2JlO SI..OO HaM SJ-'DOAID S2,700.00 S2,7IIO.00 ....OOOJIO S 19,5D1U1O 13.000.00 12SO.CIO SS,lOO.ClO $I.IOOJID S I ".00 SUO.DO $1,4110.00 $240.00 11'74.105.00 S 1.332,195.00 117"105.00 .....,...... 516.000.00 11I..0ll0.00 $6,.OOD.oo 1U2ID.oo Aaoo.oo ss,ooo.oo .2.200.00 SUJO.OO '1,600.00 S3DIl.oo '1,600.00 S6llO.oo 125.00 1150.00 IUO 'JO.OO NGII IU.OQ S2.CII Add rw. PItI-DII....... 1M- ,~ HIl*-.Ild aM lA 50325-5316 SIUS4.t511 SI5.25C.t5IS .,.. .... <: :........... ...... IW ... V.. , Pqe2 IU2O.oo S3.llOO.CIO UJlllO.OO M,4OD.OO $21,500.00 $3,200.00 nOD. $6,400.00 $1,200.00 II JOO,CIO $300.00 $1,400.00 S3OO.OO 1196,300.00 S l,lWO,OIlO.oo .196JOO.oo 'l.I~ S9.600.00 S2UIlO.oo SI2,~ $WID MIl CIIchNI Tub. Inc. ",T_ld IAIIYm. ICY 401lP 5OU6UKI 502.116.1732. -,W.Qow ........ ... M..... IH4 ... Vea,l I3,5OD.00 S2.7OO.oo S2.7oo.00 S2,CIOO.00 S3.900.OO SI,500.oo $25G.00 $1,450.00 wo.oo $20.00 1125.00 S1.OO SI.OO HCI8I $1.'00.0 1%.700.0 $2.700.0 $4.000.0 $19JOO.O $3.000.0 WO.O 15.l1OO.O $1.IOlI.D S 1.2OQ.O S25O.O S 1,400.0 '240.0 $I1U25J1l $1,13O,67s.o .,7IJ2S.OI t2.01..... S 13.000.0 '15.000.01 '12,OOl1.0I $,0.00 J1G.OC Add DedlII 8I'lJWD Steel ClInInIcbI. JIIC. PO" S4t N_OA 30264 T7C1.2D,JU2 710.253.1116 AIdmr D. It.-... sr. ... BqIneet BidIlCllllll 'Y..l ~11 TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator ~ FROM: Lee Smick, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Revised Fence Ordinance DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION The revised fence ordinance will amend Section 10-6-15 to include a clarification of fence requirements on comer lots. The ordinance will also provide a procedure for citizens to observe when constructing a fence over four feet in height. DISCUSSION Revisions to the fence ordinance proposed by the City Council at the May 5th meeting include the following: . Revise fence requirements on cornerlots to allow fences at six feet in height to be located at the front comer of the principal building and extending to the adjoining interior lot's property line and fences at six feet in height to be located beginning at the rear comer of the principal building and extending to the property line adjoining the street. . Delete the requirement for a four foot fence required when a. rear lot line abuts with the side lot .line of another lot. The Planning Commission discussed the proposed revisions to the ordinance by the City Council at their May 13th and 27th meeting and have enclosed information stating their concerns of the proposed revisions. The letter addresses comments made by the City Council concerning 1) the ordinance being unfair to property owners who own comer lots compared to interior lot property owners, 2) the approval by surrounding communities to allow six foot fences on comer lots, 3) and visual problems do not exist at intersections with six foot fences on comer lots. The information includes a letter drafted by the Planning Commission and supporting documents including the August 13, 1991 Planning Commission minutes, a residential fencing requirement matrix and location of lots within an existing subdivision illustrating I CitlJ of FarminfJ.ton 325 Oak Street · Farmint]ton1 MN 55024 · (612) 463-7111 · Fax (612) 463-2591 potential problems to the revisions proposed by the City Council. A brief presentation of this information by staff will be performed to introduce the concerns to the City Council. The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed revisions and has approved the attached fence ordinance revisions. ACTION REQUIRED Review the information presented by the Planning Commission and upon review, amend Section 10-6-10 by approving the revised fence ordinance. Respe<,;tfully submitted, v~~ ;JP Lee Smick Planning Coordinator ., PRO P 0 SED CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE Amending Title 10, Chapter 6, Section 15 - Fences THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Title 10, Chapter 6, Section lS - Fences - shall be amended by adding (underlined) and deleting (struc!t) as follows: 10-6-15: Fences: Fences shall be permitted in all yards subject to the following: A) In residential districts four foot (4') fences may be located on any lot line except that fences on interior lots may be six feet (6') in height on the side and rear lot lines beginning at the nearest front corner of the principal building. B) On corner lots. fences ~p to six feet (6') in height may be located beginning at the front corner of the principal building and extending to the adjoining interior lot's property line. Fences up to six feet (6') in height may also be located beginning at the rear corner of the principal building and extending to the property line adjoining the street. C) Should the fence be located between principal buildings with varying setbacks on adjacent lots, a fence up to six feet (6') in height may not extend beyond the average setback of the two (2) buildings. D) A variance is required for fences over six feet (6') and Qp to eight feet (8') in height when constructed within the buildable areas of lots in residential districts. E) Fences located within commercial and industrial districts may be located on any lot line up to a height of eight feet (8') except in the required front yard. F) A site plan or legal survey with the location of the proposed fence shall be submitted to the Building Inspection Division for ~pproval for all fences over four feet (4') in height. An ~pplication for a building permit is required for all fences exceeding six feet (6') in height. G) Fences in all districts. except agricultural. shall be constructed of materials widely accepted in the fencing industry. No plywood boards. canvas. plastic sheeting. metal sheeting or similar material shall be used for any fence construction. H) All fences shall be maintained in good condition and vertical position. and any missing or deteriorated wood slats. pickets. other fencing material. or structural elements shall be replaced in a timely manner with the same quality of material and workmanship. SECTION II: publication of the City such publication. After adoption, signing and attestation, ordinance shall be published one time in and shall be in effect on and after the day this the official following TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: City of Farmington Planning Commission SUBJECT: Fence Ordinance Revision DATE: May 27, 1997 INTRODUCTION & DISCUSSION The purpose of this memo is to inform the Farmington City Council of the Planning Commission's rationale for the proposed fence ordinance revision and to address the issues brought up by the Council at the May 5 Council meeting. The Planning Commission recommends the proposed revision to the fence ordinance for the following reasons: . The members of the Planning Commission share a common vision for Farmington. Despite projected growth, maintaining a closer, "small town" community environment which values the more traditional community environment and fosters a sense of community among its residents is the vision we foresee in Farmington. This vision is not constrained by the standards of other surrounding communities; rather we view distinctions as necessary to distinguish ourselves and attract future residents which share these values. . The Planning Commission's mandate is to make recommendations to the City Council which will benefit the entire community and not be influenced by political pressures. We believe the ordinance revisions previously submitted to the City Council strike an appropriate balance between the desires of individual residents and an equitable, enforceable policy which maintains appropriate levels of aesthetics and safety. There is unanimous agreement among members of the Planning Commission that to adopt an ordinance that is vague of interpretation, difficult to enforce and easy to deviate from will be virtually impossible to administer effectively and equitably. To address the specific issues brought up in the May 5th City Council meeting: 1. The proposed ordinance was unfair to owners of corner lots who would not have the same advantages as interior lot owners. To mitigate the negative effects of a larger setback on the second side of the property, it has been the policy of the Planning Commission for several years to require developers to take this into account when creating development plats. As a result, the average buildable area of corner lots is no less than those of interior lots even with the additional setback requirement. (See attached August 13, 1991 Planning Commission CitlJ. of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street · FarminfJton, MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fait (612) 463.2591 minutes). With respect to the fence height requirement, it is appropriate to interpret property which faces a public street as being "frontage" and, as such, fences on these sides should conform to standards consistent with that interpretation. This interpretation enhances safety and contributes positively to the overall appearance of the community. 2. Other communities in the metro area allow property owners with corner lots to construct six foot fences in the areas this ordinance would prohibit. (See attached Residential Fencing Requirements Matrix). That aside, it is not the vision of the Planning Commission that Farmington adopt the policies and standards of surrounding communities. We believe Farmington to be unique and its standards should reflect that uniqueness by adopting those which foster a family-friendly, traditional sense of community. 3. No visual problems were apparent at intersections with six foot high fences. Safety was and is of the utmost concern to the Planning Commission in approving the original revised ordinance. Safety should not be compromised when the ordinance is revised. Asingle incident far outweighs any benefit to any group when revising the originally approved ordinance. To prove this point, attached to this document are typical lots within a subdivision which clearly show the hazards of fences visually blocking intersections. Although the visibility problem is subjective, it is apparent from these illustrations that visual problems exist. At this point, the Planning Commission is not willing to incur any responsibility for potential safety problems if the originally approved ordinance is revised. RECOMMENDATION For these reasons the Planning Commission believes its recommended changes to the fencing ordinance are appropriate and consistent with the overall vision of how we wish Farmington to grow. We believe it is necessary to be consistent in our vision and to adopt standards that are understandable, enforceable and easy to administer . We believe the recommendations provided by the Planning Commission accomplish these goals and resubmit them for consideration by the City Council. As a Planning Commission, we have addressed your initial concerns to the best of our ability and have worked diligently to provide a complete and safe fence ordinance revision. We request you to look at the issues we have addressed and make a conscious decision for providing a safe and effective ordinance for the future of Farmington. ~ ~~L~ Karla Keagy ~ ~.r2~ C.J imones 1'1 J.l'C U ,U:'.:l PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR AUGUST 13, 1991 ,- 1. Chairman Hanson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Gramentz, Hanson, Rotty, Schlawin, Thelen. Members Absent: None. Also Present: Planner Tooker. 2. The Chairman asked for comments on the Minutes of July 9, 1991. MOTION by Schlawin second by Gramentz to approve the minutes of July 9, 1991 as distributed. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. Chairman Hanson reopened the Public Hearing requested by David Nielsen of 909 Hickory Street to build a garage/storage building 10 feet in front of existing set back lines. Planner Tooker said that Mr. Nielsen had decided to build the structure within a rear yard and therefore there is no further need to hold open this hearing. MOTION by Rotty second by Schlawin to close the Public Hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 'd-=-- .::.' [, -":: r ..~. ~~~;. 4. Chairman Hanson opened the Public Hearing advertised for 7:05 P.M. regarding a zoning Ordinance change recommended by staff regarding the size of garages. The ordinance will return Title 10, Chapter 4, Section 1 (L) to read as it did prior to a May 1991 revision which limited all private garages for residential property to 800 square feet. The ordinance will return to the original concept about the size of detached garages. This will allow the construction of a detached garage-when~Tan attached garage may already be in place as long as the overall building coverage does not exceed 20%. MOTION by Rotty second by Thelen to forward the proposed change in Title 10, Chapter 4, Section l(L) to the City Council with the recommendation that it should approved. APIF, HOTI-oN r.A'R'RTI:Tl. 5. Planner Tooker raised a question regarding zoning administration. Since the application for a variance requested by Mr. Nielsen was not actually possible to grant, would the Commission consider refunding Mr. Nielsen's application fee? Chairman Hanson said he believed this to be an administrative issue which should be handled by the Zoning Administrator. Members agreed. 6. The Planner then recieved a request from staff to determine the meaning of a six foot fence that traverse~ an uneven ground line. The focus of this discussion is a neighborhood dispute involving a fence built by Pete Gerten at 707 Centennial Circle. There was disagreement among the staff about the height since the fence owner changed the ground elevation after the fence was in place. A neighbor was particularly unhappy since the fence was built with the "wrong side" facing her property. The members of the Commission each looked at the site and did not agree upon the definition of a six foot fence. Chairman Hanson suggested the need for a policy on fences which follow uneven topography. After a lengthy discussion, the following motion was adopted. MOTION by Rotty second by Gramentz to determine that the fence under discussion is a six foot fence even though short segments are more than six feet higher than the original ground elevation. APPROVE: Gramentz, Rotty, Schlawin, Thelen. DISAPPROVE: Hanson. MOTION CARRIED. '~'7' Planner Tooker introduced the schematic plan for Silver Springs by saying it has been before the commission in several forms. The current plan does~ follow street ' alignments previously agreed to but many of the lots are at the minimum required . by zoning. ~~ile the consulting engineer has attempted to increase the size of corner lots, they are still quite small. He noted that 15 corner lots in this plat were smaller than would be acceptable. The Planner suggested that many communities require corner lots to be 20% wider and 20 % larger than the minimum requirements for other lots. In the Farmington R-1 District this would mean that corner lots must be 90 feet wide and at least 12,000 square feet in area. Planner Tooker then indicated that the existing sewer line and adjoining development suggested an interesting split entry drive which would provide a median strip location for an identification sign sign along County Road 31. 1r~members were interested in the lot sizes proposed, as they appear to be smaller than those in adjoing plats. MOTION by Schlawin second by Rotty to approve the concept as proposed except that the corner lots in particular need to be significantly larger than proposed. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 8. The Planner presented a discussion on a proposed office and storage building for Dakota County Lumber on the west side of Eighth Street in Farmington. He indicated the need for paving across the entire entry and outlined concerns written by the City Engineer. Special emphasis was placed on the need for an easement granted by the owner to the City for the City Water Main which traverses the site. The Engineer pointed out that the railroad granted a license for this line but, for maintenance purposes an easement should be required. Chairman Hanson said that there is an existing "tin shed" which is 34 feet from Pine Steet and that this building should establish the front yard setback. Planner Tooker replied that while this has been the practice in residential areas, there is no precedent for for that within the Industrial District. He said in addition that the ordinance was established to provide standards for new development lasting for a long period of time. Ge~ral response from the members was that because of the cqnfiguration of this prop~rty, a 50 foot setback would limit the expansion potential of this business. MOTION by Schlawin second by Rotty to approve the development plan subject to a 35 foot setback from Pine Street and all of the recommendations from the City Engineer to the Planner in his memo dated August 13, 1991. APIF, MOTION CARRIED . ~... ..~.; . t.....:.:. ..' ". 9. Planner Tooker reviewed a possible amendment to the subdivision ordinance regarding Arterial Road Screening. It was the consensus of those present that the ordinance could use some refinement and that perhaps it would be combined with a proposal to develop wording which specifically addresses the size of corner lots within new sub- divisions. re";~~ Planner Tooker briefly re"i,~ the request of Clayton Nielsen for a variance which would allo~ split ownership of a duplex he has proposed for the corner of Spruce and First Streets. A public Hearing has been set for 5:00 P.M. on August 20, 1991 in the Council Chambers. Member Rotty asked if the staff could call each member to remind them of the special meeting. 10. 11. Chairman Hanson recognized David Nielsen who had specific questions about the enforcement of upkeep on City resident ail lots and the current policy of allowing "pole type" buildings within residential areas. The issue of pole buildings has previously been discussed but not with the current City Council. The Chairman indicated an interest in placing ~R~i~ concerns on a future agenda. ~~ 12. There being no further business, the Commission agreed wo adjourn at 9:20 P.M. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Charles Tooker City Planner APpro~ q~ aJ) . 1 Submitted by, of~~t~ Ul Q) :;::; '2 ;j E E o u Cl c: '5 c: ;j o .... .... ;j (J) .5 Ul "E 11l "C c: 11l U5 Cl c: '0 c: Q) IJ.. III Gl '0 z ~~o <5 rJ) 5 C-O'E m ffi 8- .s:: _ Cl)ac ~ 'Q) .g ~ c..c_~ =c:U'>Q :2 ~ [..c ii-g J:o=~ : ~ Q.l ~~g III Gl .= a; "0 '5 Cl - c "i ~ "0 C 1II III ~ - III C o o ffi ~ "3 l'll 0 CI) .f: a ~ ~ C.'CD ~ C'G ~..c:.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ -a~ Ul Q= a.l'll CD (Q >- <0 .a u '"'0 t:: f/) '0 C QlQlc Gl ;; 0.0 ,2 I&. E ~ '0 Q; Co:s a.. ~ t!.l!l . 0 "0 oJ .. Gl a E 00 -0 1II_ - III U C X. .2 Ul- b ~ M C c~ ~ ai N ~ c-q- ~:a i ~S:5 :e 0 '- 5r~ o~:E ~~g fij~ ~o .l!l .s:: Cl '. J: E '" E 'iC 1II ~ ~ g>.8 ,_ .s:: :s.~ .0 c l'll_ >.0 't: '" l'll-o ~~ '" Ql 5~ x-o l'll c ~ l'll Co m ~ "0 e ':; cr . Q: - 'e ~ a.. Cl C :E '5 lD "':<: ~ Cl c: '4) .2!.s:: ~ .5 -0'" Ql Cl .: c: 6-:0 Ql Ql ~ ~ g Ql '" 'E m Q>"2 a.. :::J Gl Q. a. <( '0 ~ ~= .- 1II 0> Ql '" '" a; c c: > 0 ,2 '~~ ~ 5~~ c.~,- ::)_J2 -o.s:::::J .! .Q).2 1II Ql t:: o.s:: l'll o .0. - >. ~i,g e o.~ :;00. C ~ a. WOol'll c :g:2.g Q)~C: :o.go {g;gc", = :::J ~ ~ ,S.ooc .5 ~ ~ .e :5 'Ci) ~ -0 'S: :i ,.... <<; ~o.:!:..>. ~ x ~ ?E ~ .E CQU,N -q- '" Ql >- ~ Ol 'OJ C l'll a. 'g.5 e Ql -0 Ql -Q):C .E .~ ~ !l'Ce 5i 'i ~ E E ~ e.!!i'O 'S .~ c: g.! ~ ~~~ Z 8 ,g a. :::J ,- '" :::J Ql .0 C Ql= .0>' iQ"al E e '" a. ~ c Ql U. Ql C o Z b b MOM .5 C C) .s:: ai ,5 ~.s: ~ .:0 ~ ~B~ ;g C) CD '" C c 5ti'E o~.!2 Ql~a. "6>~ 0 .~ i 23 ~ .! -0 ~ '3 0' Ql Q: '0 z "'- Ql.s:: o Cl ~~ .E :.5 -0<0 Ql Cl .: c: 5-:0 Ql Ql .:: ~ g Ql '" E gj Q;C a. :::J ~ 'S; '" c ~ lD '0 ~ i3 cfl,-: "''5, (i)= l'll-o Ql C -l'll-o co .: Q) Q)aJ(5 iU '0 ~ .s:: Ql '" mOlQl ..cm~ '" l'll '" a. ~ C C Ql Ql a. I&. 0 '" Ql >- .! ~ ~ ~ 0 .2 .~~ ~ c:~~ 8.!~ ::J_~ -o.s:::::J .! .2>> ,2 l'll Ql. 1: o.s:: l'll o . a. ~~.9 e! ~~ ;00. c ~ a. WOol'll ~ i~ ~..... .Q ~ mJe i 5 Ql Ql C baa> '" c a. ~ 1II 0 o 'I: .~ !:- ig .... c 0:2 z~ E :::J E 'x l'll ~ '" _c CS.2e ;~~ :g~2. ;g~im ,S.cg-g .5 ~ ~ .e :5 'u) ~ -0 'i ~ 1 ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ E CoCoN -q- ~ '3 0' Ql Q: 'E Qj a. C III Cl III W '0 ~ i3 ~ os; Gl ... III oJ '0 ~ i3 Ql 0 ~.s"O ;~~ :;~~ 0= ;; : .~ mea - -E '&i ~.~ Ql1ii.?:-~ ~ E ~ 'S ~.g ~'g ~ oJE~ Z'O >. t:: Ql a. e a. Ql :; C '" o ~ 0= c '5 .0 ,g a. ::> ~ c ~ 0:<: c Cl ~'i :~ J: :a .5 'u.; : 5g '0 4; Ql > '6>0 c l'll ~ '" E8 :::J a. E ~ 'x .g l'll ' ~ ~ "'~ ~ - C '" o '0 ; ~~ UQ: Ql C o Z "'-0 mffi~ :a-8m ~'ii) ~ Q)C1:J4; Q. 0 .5 C [i ~ 8 -~.oc (ij~~o cco:.=~ 0",_ ~ ,- Q c ~ ffi J!ffi~ ~- Ql :a >. 1: Ql a. e a. Ol c o m >< l'll ~ N -q- :Q c ~ o l'll x~ l'll Ql ~~'" E ~ ,~ :::J E- ,~ 8 l'll Ol ~:S "''5 .0 l'll s '" ci M ~ -0 ~ '3 0' Ql Q: 'E Qj a. '" ~ c:: .2! .9: -0 c !~ '~ ~ ~ ~ 'E Qj a. C S Cl C 0'- ~E ,- III 01&. Iz ,1,1 \ oil ~ .., ~ 0. ~ 01 'j I po :;J W L. CO 0<0 ~ '" .. ~ ~~ I- u.. .., , I, la.. 0 rz t.j 0 ::> U) '.~ ~ - ~.. o - z.... U) ~ ,," 01 0'" CO en .~~ i ~...- 0 ...p.... >-~ I e-". - h:;J .4 .X co COO .g.:i ,.... a::: o~ w_ ...... -< N.g N .x .;.......... CJ)~ t:Q ~ "'e .- eN ..CD ~~ U; W::: 0- "':I ~ IDm~ ::::E'"' Cj. I! O~ 0- w i! :c~ ~ 1O ~ ~ O~ c:c 11 . ..~ i i Zu .~~ . t <(~ '^' ':> ~ ; >=~ \ e;,4;)OJ ~ 11 ~ '1 ~ ~ W1ii ~ ! ~~ L{) \..: 0 .... >. Q) > \.. m :J C l/) a: L. "- W aI 0 W II Q) .z C ic ..... 3.0~.gS.OOS *001* 0 Jf. - C >f. U * Do u ... :;: ..... ic..,.* '- CU U ., \ ~:i".:" ~ :~ .-i.1!-I-I ..... ::.~:..... W ",~?'-- ~ , ~,... '-.~, (l~ ~~ \,j.. ~;,i~) ....~~ CD ~ \~O 0: \~ ~ '.- ~ .~ \,0 ~.~ '/ ..../0 ,U) ~ .... " 0)<1:)<-:> \ O.~ \ ":>4'- . I ',', )/ '\,/" /\ ._<\ I '.. '.. I ' '\~/ A I\~o \ I .'.) .'D '" 01 , \ I \ \ \ v -' ~ ~.~ j"., """ // tl~ , ~\ . ,3: , cnU) ~~\ !'lit') O' ~O ~1- ?cO g~i c;;a7 <]0: -z <> '" z' ..... .. ~I VI'" '" OVl "' g,g a::c or , 0.. I .., k "! "', ,", ~ ui '" "', ~~ ' tl f , ------~ -5 I a'' ffi f 01 --~:--~ "" 0 , , ~ I , , , , , "'WID ctn.lI! .... <(-... ",0..", ,..: xl:in '" 01 o ~ ZQ, I wo lDt-W tJtl1 .... It.. * PION.IOA ~ iirioln..iirlnq .. il .. * l.W~'-''''''''' ......1\MIIuI. ....CM1 .-.... 2.22 r.,OI",lw Olive Y'''doto He.... YN ~:'120 (012) 081-11114 FAX:081-1l<f88 ~~~~~.J~~~."'(' (012) 7l1J-l080 rAX: 783-188J Certificate of Survey for: PARTRIDGE HOMES lOB SITE D~~WAY26'ATCURB nc"CH U.nK AT PROPERTY ) PRO \1 E'iJfa",\ 4 \ \ ~ \ ~~. S88"2S'24"W 119.39\ tA 1541.4 4'.1l '~5.5 -- .".it". .j( * ':'JOl',er.J:1 ..j( -~~-~---...._. ". englnal!lr.ny *-1< ".'* Certificate of Survey for: " , '" \ ~ \../~/ ./ "" -PRapo~rn HOU~r rlfVaI~ lOWEST flOOR <LEVA TlON~ -CL~"L TOP or BLOCI( ELEVATION, q (..4. () CMAC( SLAB HEVA TlON: -!!J::2t...::... NOIC: .0oPOS(0 CRADes SNO"'. FER CRADlNO ...." By: SAlHlIE.'UCOOOVoSI ""r.: ......... I)IU[N""'., ,"""', "'r. '011 HORllOl"'l AND I't'f'TlCAllOCATlOt' OF SIRUC:fUAES ONlY. S~t AACJH1(CWA,l PLANS rOIl O..'tl.PIHQ ANO r':lUHo...'rON DI"'E~510US. unr~. Nn ~rrll"lf" 0;"",,= ...".....'."I.T.'.... U'e' IlIrr" "'I'\o""'r"rn I\t, ...... 'n... n... ~.... x nnn.nn nrNn,,...; ~.,o;'lNn I'll'''..,.,... I , :541.21 'I~ 955.. !;;! i~ ,(II I~ '~ I~ c.o. e.a. l I l.~ f q(l TO: Mayor and Council Members City Administrator1~ FROM: David L. Olson Community Development Director SUBJECT: As-Built Certificates of Survey sINew Construction DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION Recent drainage problems in new subdivisions in Farmington have required a considerable amount of City staff time in trying to resolve these problems. Staff is recommending the following changes to the private development process to address these concerns. DISCUSSION Engineering, Planning, and Building Inspection staff have been discussing ways to alleviate drainage problems in developing subdivisions for several months. The problems most often occur when individual lots are built on or graded in a manner that is not consistent with the approved grading plan for the subdivision. The City of Farmington currently requires that a Certificate of Survey be submitted with each building permit application. which shows the elevations of the lowest floor of the house and garage as well as the lot corners and the direction of the surface drainage for the lot. Building Inspection and Engineering staff check these individual Certificates of Surveys against the previously approved grading plan prior to issuing a building permit. The problems arise in situations where the final grading of individual lots is not consistent with the previously submitted Certificate of Survey. By the time a drainage problem is discovered, the lot has likely been sodded and the new home has been occupied. City staff are usually contacted at this point, if a drainage problem exists, and it becomes much more difficult to have the builder correct the problem "after the fact". Staff is suggesting a change in the process to require As-Built Certificates of Survey for new residential, commercial, and industrial buildings. This requirement is proposed to be part of the building permitting process and it is recommended that an additional $1,500 surety be required for single family residential permits. Parking lot and landscaping sureties currently required for commercial and industrial building permits should be sufficient in most cases. An As-Built Survey will now be required prior to the release of this surety. The As-Built Certificates Surveys will be required prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. If the survey is approved by the City Engineer, the amount of the surety being held for CitlJ. of FarminiJ.ton 325 Oak Street · Farm;ntjton, MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fait (612) 463.2591 issues. Lakeville currently requires As-Built Surveys for problem are s only and escrowed funds are required. Prior Lake currently has engineering staff check as-built el vations and requires $1,500 in escrow for both landscaping and grading. The City of Savage currentl requires As-Built Surveys and holds $1,200 in escrow on each building permit for this purpose. BUDGET IMPACT None. ACTION REQUESTED Approval of a resolution authorizing that As-Built Surveys be required as part of the permitting process for all new construction and that a surety in the amount of $1 ,500 be established for this purpose. Staff is recommending that this new requirement take effect July 7, 1997. Respectfully Submitted, Q~<< Community Development Director TO: Development Committee Members FROM: Richard Schindler, Faith Druckrey SUBJECT: As-built Certificate of Survey/Drainage Problems DATE: March 6, 1997 In November the Engineering and Building Inspection Division met to discuss solutions to drainage problems in Farmington. As a result Faith Druckrey and I were assigned the task of drafting as-built surveys requirements and language for new development agreements. The following steps will provide the City of Farmington with tools to manage drainage problems. Step 1) Require all developers to provide as-built surveys for each lot in the development. This would be implemented through language in the developers agreement as follows: Security in an amount established by the City Council shall be held for each lot within the plat until the Developer submits an as-built cenificate of survey. All as-built cenificates of surveys shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. As-built surveys shall meet the requirements of standard Plate No. 1 and be completed after the house is built and before the lot is seeded or sodded. Step 2) Require surveyors to submit a standard certificate of survey with the building permit application. A checklist and standard plate No.2 will assist the Building Inspection Division in the initial review (see attachment). Step 3) The developer submits an as-built certificate of survey for engineering to review. If the survey is approved, surety held in the letter of credit will be reduced. Please review the enclosed information and comment on this proposal at the March 10 development committee meeting. ~' . Q.' ' ., " 7,- '-'Co ha.<.<:', ~ /...", tlvi ............ I / Richard Schindler, Civil Engineer Faith Druckrey , Building Inspector CitlJ of Farmin9ton 325 Oak Street. Farmintjton, MN 5502~ · (612) 1,63.7171 · Fax (612) ~63.2591 (( AS-BUILT CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY LOT 1. BLOCK 5 TROYHILL 2ND ADDITION ~ ! I N I SCALE 1 .. - 30' MAIN STREET BENCHMARK 957.00 967.00 J4' )( ...c ~o ~'), .~~o e ~o I I I I I 5' 5' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I ., LOT I 4 'so c)( ~.,o )( ..~o ...c ~o ~ ~o':J. I I r------- I .1 5': S;;I I ,~. -.., I 15' I ~ ,s.'~ ~- '0 N LOT 2 30' _J h/.CO /' "g: y.C-:,"~ TOI' NUT CF FIRE H'tOIW<T eETWtEN Lor 4 NOO 5, eu< 5 ELtV. - 969.02 4?' I I I I I I I 954 I I I 5' I I I L___ I I I I 5' I I I L________ I I : OIUlNACE ole UTlUY ~ 5' EASE"E"T PE~ PUT I I ___...1 '.: ~.,'1.~ Notes Top of Foundation wall elevation Garage floor elevation Lowest floor elevation Walkout floor elevation 912 Existing elevations o Drainage direction Iron Monument REVISIONS STANDARD DETAILS AS-BUll..T CERTIFICA1E OF SURVEY 1241-96 RLS II CITY OF ~ FARMINGTON PLATE No. 1 l CITY OF FARMINGTON ENG INEERING DEPT. )[ ~ r 1 I N I SCALE . 1" BENCHMARK TOP NUT OF' FIRE H'ItlRNIT BtTWUH ~OT 4 AHO 5. au< 5 [LEV. - 161.02 Notes CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY LOT 1, BLOCK 5 TROYHILL 2ND ADDITION MAIN STREET c.)( 'Ii. .,0 ~"'_. )( <:F ....c. Ojo". ;( \~~ ~ ~~o;.o ~o 0". -.., I 15' I --b~-- I " - I ---1 - i-~T---- --~~~':.::.::.-.., 5': ~I I 'A' ~~ ~ r-- - 30' LOT 4 67. 1------ I 5' I I I I I r-~5___ I I I I I I , I , I _955 -- I I I I I I I -- __I ..,26..!._ I I \ CAAN.OCE at UT1l.TY.J\ 5' 5': - .L~"E"T PER Pl,,>T I I I I L___ -_I , I I I I LOT 2 : ------........ I -+ I I S1 '0 .. --- --- , ..... -- ~~~ c}" 34' 30' _J ~ 'i~C~,,~ ~ /~ ----- ...., --- I..... I '-I.. I I .... " I I ........ I I .... I I -......, I I 1 \ --- I I I I 15' I '" I ___J , .....J. I .'..... I ...... , 5' I I I L________ ..... . ..... ". __9~ .... '. 2 2 " o~ . '!l~ "~SJ ..... .... 0').9 '!l0'~ &/ .... --- Existing contour 9658 967 960 N.A. @P 912 Top of Foundation wall elevation Garage floor elevation Lowest floor elevation Walkout floor elevation Proposed elevations EXisting elevations ~ Proposed contour ~ Sanitary Sewer Invert o Iron Monument Drainage direction CITY OF FARMINGTON STANDARD DETAILS REVISIONS '1-21-'16 IlLS CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (- )[ 1 PLATE No. CITY OF FARMINGTON ENGINEERING DEPT. Z- PRO P 0 SED RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUIREMENT FOR AS BUILT SURVEYS TO THE BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS AND AMENDING R8-97 (1997 FEES AND CHARGES FOR LICENSES AND PERMITS) BY ADDING A SURETY FOR SUCH SURVEYS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 2nd day of June, 1997 at 7:00 P.M.. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, drainage problems in developing subdivisions have occurred on a frequent basis due to a failure of builders to match the final grade of individual lots to City approved grading plans for the entire subdivision; and WHEREAS, a requirement to provide an As Built Certificate of Survey for all new residential, commercial and industrial buildings is proposed to become part of the building permit process to ensure that the final grade of individual lots after building construction is consistent with the approved subdivision grading plan for that lot; and WHEREAS, to ensure that such As Built Certificate of Survey is provided to the City a surety in the amount of $1,500 will be required with all single family residential building permits, and will be included in parking lot and landscaping sureties for commercial and industrial buildings; and WHEREAS, the COUIlcil has the authority to establish requirements and fees for the City of Farmington; and WHEREAS, the COUIlcil has determined that As Built Certificates of Survey should become a requirement of the building permit process and has determined that a surety in the amount of $1,500 is an adequate amount to ensure compliance with this requirement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Farmington establishes a requirement for As Built Certificates of Survey for all residential, commercial and industrial buildings and amends Resolution No. R8-97 by adding a surety of $1,500 to the Building Permit Fees and Charges for such certificates of survey for residential buildings. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 2nd day of June, 1997. Mayor Attested to the day of June, 1997. City Administrator qb FROM: Mayor and City Co~~ ~ City Administrator J- -- Robin Roland, Finance Director TO: SUBJECT: Debt Management Study DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION An analysis of the City's outstanding debt situation has been completed by Juran & Moody. Copies of the study are included with Council's packet. Tom Truszinski will be present at the Council meeting to review the City's situation. DISCUSSION The results of the Debt Management study indicate a significant fiscal problem. If all things remain the same and no action is taken to address the situation, the City will show a $1 million cash shortfall for debt payments as early as 2000, escalating to a $2.2 million shortfall in less than eight years. This projection is based on existing special assessments, tax increments and tax levy revenues. These revenues are not enough to cover the annual debt service payments required. This shortfall will occur due to: 1) special assessments certified for less than originally predicted in the bond documents resulting in less revenue, 2) prepaid special assessments inflating the fund balances and tax levies being eliminated due to a misperception of enough funds available, 3) difficulty in matching special assessment revenues to the proper bond issues, and 4) projects that were bonded for and not done, with the bond proceeds being applied to other projects and not accounted for with revenue. This issue is not new. The City's auditors, Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co. addressed this problem in their Management Report of 1992 (see copy attached). As the table indicates, it was apparent that the City did not have sufficient revenues to make the debt payments on the outstanding debt of that time. Subsequently, the City issued further debt which suffers from the same situations as indicated in MMKR's management report. By law this cash shortfall must be addressed; funds must be available to pay the debt service on the bond issues. The means available to remedy this situation are few. Normally, refunding bond issues with bonds that have lower interest rates would be an option. However, the outstanding bonds that the City has are either non-callable (non-refundable) or the call date on the bonds is so far in the future as to not be helpful in the refinancing process. In the case of the 1992 and 1993 bond issues, funds still exist in the Capital Project funds which are related to the debt issues. These funds are more than likely special assessment revenues which were improperly classified or the remains of the bond proceeds which were not expended. As these projects have been completed, the original bond resolutions require these Capital Project funds to be closed and their balances transferred to the corresponding debt service funds. This action will offset the shortfall by almost $500,000. However, it does not address the entire issue. CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street · Farmini}ton, MN 55024 · (612) 463-7111 · Fair (612) 463-2591 As the bonds are General Obligation bonds ("backed by the full faith, credit and power of the City to levy direct general ad valorem taxes"), the City must institute additional levies to make up the total shortfall. Proposed options will be discussed at the meeting. Levying for debt payments is excluded from the levy limits proposal currently awaiting the Governor's signature. BUDGET IMPACT Obviously, this debt situation has significant impact on the City's ability to 1) levy taxes for general fund expenditures and 2) bond for further projects which would require the City to contribute funds beyond any special assessments. If the City wants to maintain or reduce the 34.9% Tax Capacity Rate, and the amount of the total levy which must go to pay debt is increased, then the amount remaining for general fund expenditures is reduced. Increasing expenses due to an increasing tax base will be difficult to fund. Add to this impending levy limits and a significant budgeting problem comes into focus. Likewise, further City improvement projects which call for City funding of the expenses, must be curtailed, as the debt levy to pay for existing debt leaves no room for future levies. City projects funded entirely by special assessments or non levy revenues or fees would be allowable. As the City Council has recently discussed modification of the special assessment policy (resulting in lower assessments and more City contributions), caution is advised when a decision on this policy is formulated. ACTION REQUESTED Supplemental levies will be explained as part of the financial pro-forma presented at the meeting. Final proposed supplemental levy will be introduced as part of the 1998 City Budget. Determination of an appropriate supplemental levy will need to be reviewed and analyzed as the budget is developed. No action is necessary at this time. u:f / . Robin Roland Finance Director Debt Service F'1Duk Due to the complex nature of governmental accounting, the financial statementS do not present the City's debt and the respective sources of funding in one easy to evaluate schedule. This analysis is further complicated by the nature of the revenue sources involved. FaT instance, in some cases the City has the flexibility 10 utilize or eJjJl1jnate such sources as ad valorem taxes or interfund transfers. The following table provides a summary of debt service commitments and related known funding sources as of December 31, 1992 for the City's Improvement Bond Debt Service Funds. This analysis was not considered practlcal for the City's other Debt Service Funds due to the 1DlCCrta.inty of future funding sources such as iax tncremcnts. Debt Service Fund Fund Balance 12/31/92 Deferred Revenue Sdleduled Tax Levies Total Sources Future Debt Service Principal and Interest Improvement BoDds of 1973 $ (117,291) S 116,5:36 $ 23,866.s 23,111 $ 115,610 Improvement Bonds of 1975 (31,638) 12.611 (19,027) Improvement Bonds of 1981 233,769 30,776 264,545 237.350 Improvement Bonds of 1982 4,384 3,184 7,S68 Improvement Bonds of 1983A 191,620 197,620 206,981 Improvement Bouc1I of 1983B 28,830 28,830 67,975 ImprovcmcDt Bands of J986A 75,540 239,052 '314,592 "682,17. Improvemcm BonGs of 1986B 40,780 112,126 122,773 27S,679 289,250 Improvement Bonds of 1987 283,569 372,109 258,233 '914.~1l 'l,231,S654r- Improvement Bonds of 1990 151.533 48,903 743,J16 943.752 932,740 Improvement Bonds of 1991 173,584 3'2.227 124,290 1,250,101 1,179,878 Impmvemem Bondi ~ 43,638 5g9,606 297,1A8 C au,49Z . 1 ,766.31~ It should be noted that this analysis does not take into account such potential funding sources as interest on investments. interest on future years' special assessments, or interfund transfers. However, it does provide some basis for analyzing these funds to determine wbich ones may be in need of additional funding. We also recommend that those funds for which no funher debt service existS should be closed out. -9- TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator SUBJECT: CSAH 31 - Noise Mitigation DATE: June 2, 1997 INTRODUCTION\DISCUSSION Contrary to what I verbally conveyed to Council last week at the public hearing for Main Street regarding the status of the noise mitigation legislation, the Governor, according to the State Revisor's Office, received the bill on Friday, May 30th, Unfortunately, the information I received through the Session Weekly, the official publication of the MN Legislature, indicated that the bill had already made its way to the Governor and he was expected to sign it. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused Council. In the future, I will communicate directly with the Governor's Office on the status of any bill to hopefully ensure that the information is accurate. It is my understanding that the Governor has until Tuesday, June 3, 1997 to either sign or veto the bill. In the absence of any action by the Governor, the bill would become law on June 4, 1997. This information was obtained from the Revisor's Office. ACTION REOUESTED None. This is for information only. Respe7Cd, J.~ Erar p: 1dministrator I CitlJ of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street. Farmin9ton] MN 55024 · (612) 463-7111 · Fa/( (612) 463-2591