HomeMy WebLinkAbout08.19.96 Council Packet
//
AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
AUGUST 19, 1996
NOTE:
Joint PARAC/Council Meeting at 6:30 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVE AGENDA
4. CITIZENS COMMENTS (5 minute limit per person for items
not on the agenda.)
5. CONSENT AGENDA (All items approved in 1 motion unless
anyone wishes an item removed for discussion)
a. Approve Minutes - 8/5/96 (Regular)
b. Renew Solid Waste Garage Rental Agreement
c. Approve RFPs for City Auditing Firm
d. Resolution Approving Use of IRBs for Duo Plastics Project
e. Establish 1996 Library Idea School Budget
f. Approve Final Contractor Payment - Southeast Area Sanitary Sewer
g. Update on Policy on Brush Removal from Private Property
h. Federal Disaster Aid Update
i. Approve Emergency Evacuation Plan for LaPetite Academy
j. Adopt Resolution Approving Development Agreement for Farmington
Industrial Park 2nd Addition
k. Met council Denial of City Grant Application for I/I Control
1. Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation of Coffee Maker
m. Recommendation for Employment - Assistant Liquor Operations
Manager
n. Approve School/Conference Request - LOGIS Windows NT - City
Administrator
o. Approve Payment of the Bills
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS/AWARD OF CONTRACTS
a. 7:30 P.M. - Amend Zoning Ordinance - Accessory Storage Buildings
b. Farmington Industrial Park 2nd Addition 1) Receive/Award Bid for
Improvements and 2) Bond Issue for Infrastructure
c. Receive/Award Bid for Towing Contract
7. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Disposition of Contaminated Soil - Wausau Alignment
b. Adopt Resolution Approving Use of CDBG Funds for Exterior
Renovation of Exchange Bank Building
" .
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Presentation of 1995 Audit
b. Additional or Revised Questions for Southeast Area Survey
c. Results of City Wide Survey
d. Recycling Activity Zoning - Planning Commission Comments
1) Zoning
2) Solid Waste Ordinance Review
e. Proposed Enhancement of NURP Pond - Prairie Waterway Phase II
f. Proposed Cat Control Ordinance
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Dakota County Land Use Issues/Transportation Plan
b. Western Dakota County Ice Arena Proposal
c. Council Workshop on County Road 31 Project - August 26, 1996
10. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, COUNCILMEMBERS
11 . ROUNDTABLE
12 . ADJOURN
,
.
AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
AUGUST 19, 1996
NOTE:
Joint PARAC/Council Meeting at 6:30 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3 . APPROVE AGENDA
4. CITIZENS COMMENTS (5 minute limit per person for items
not on the agenda.)
5. CONSENT AGENDA (All items approved in 1 motion unless
anyone wishes an item removed for discussion)
a. Approve Minutes - 8/5/96 (Regular)
b. Renew Solid Waste Garage Rental Agreement
c. Approve RFPs for City Auditing Firm
d. Resolution Approving Use of IRBs for Duo Plastics Project
e. Establish 1996 Library Idea School Budget
f. Approve Final Contractor Payment - Southeast Area sanitary Sewer
g. Update on Policy on Brush Removal from Private Property
h. Federal Disaster Aid Update
i. Approve Emergency Evacuation Plan for Lapetite Academy
j. Adopt Resolution Approving Development Agreement for Farmington
Industrial Park 2nd Addition
k. Met Council Denial of City Grant Application for I/I Control
1. Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation of Coffee Maker
m. Recommendation for Employment - Assistant Liquor Operations
Manager
n. Approve School/Conference Request - LOGIS Windows NT - City
Administrator
o. Approve Payment of the Bills
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS/AWARD OF CONTRACTS
a. 7:30 P.M. - Amend Zoning Ordinance - Accessory Storage Buildings
b. Farmington Industrial Park 2nd Addition l) Receive/Award Bid for
Improvements and 2) Bond Issue for Infrastructure
c. Receive/Award Bid for Towing Contract
7. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Disposition of Contaminated Soil - Wausau Alignment
b. Adopt Resolution Approving Use of CDBG Funds for Exterior
Renovation of Exchange Bank Building
.:: "
. '
_:'cti on Taken
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Presentation of 1995 Audit
b. rldditional or Revised Questions for Southeast Area Survey
c. Results of City Wide Survey
d. Recycling Activity zoning - Planning Commission Comments
1) Zoning
2) Solid Waste Ordinance Review
e. Proposed Enhancement of NURP Pond - prairie Waterway Phase -~
f. Proposed Cat Control Ordinance
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Dakota County Land Use Issues/Transportation Plan
b. Western Dakota County Ice Arena Proposal
c. Council Workshop on County Road 31 Project - August 26, 1996
10. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, COUNCILMEMBERS
11. ROUNDTABLE
12. ADJOURN
.
,
4
0(
COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR
AUGUST 5. 1996
r--
~
.~~
1. Mayor Kuchera convened the meeting at 7:05 P.M..
Members Present: Kuchera, Galler, Fitch, Ristow, Gamer.
!I1embers Absent: None.
Also Present: City Administrator Erar, Attorney Grannis.
2. Mayor Kuchera led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Mayor Kuchera introduced David Dahl, Public Works Department employee, and
presented him with a plaque and certificate of commendation in honor of his
retirement from the City. The Council congratulated Mr. Dahl and thanked him for
his service to the City.
4. MOTION by Galler, second by Gamer to approve the agenda with the following
changes:
a) Remove item 6d - amending Comprehensive Plan for prairie Creek 4th Addition
Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension - from Consent Agenda for discussion.
b) Remove item 6i - Deer Meadow Second Addition Development Agreement - from
Consent Agenda for discussion.
c) Table item 9c - 1995 Audit Presentation - until August 19, 1996.
d) Table item 9h - Parental Responsibility Ordinance - until August 19, 1996.
e) Transfer item 12a - External Involvement in Internal Organizational Matters-
from Roundtable to New Business.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
5. Citizen Comments
Darrell Moench - Thanked City Administrator Erar for his help in resolving the
issue regarding water to his daughter'S property.
Wausau NURP Pond Issues - to be covered under item 9b of the agenda.
Donation by Don and Peg Davison - Administrative Assistant Finstuen described the
infrared aerial photo of the City which the
Davisons had donated to the City. MOTION by Gamer, second by Kuchera to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. R77-96 accepting the donation by Don and Peg Davison of a framed
and mounted infrared aerial photograph of the City. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
6. MOTION by Galler, second by Ristow to approve the Consent Agenda as follows:
a) Approve minutes of the July 15, 1996 regular Council meeting.
b) Recognize the participants in the Liquor Store's winning team in the Mt. Dew
Bed Race.
c) Accept the Fire Cataract Annual Benefit/City Contribution Request
d) Approve Stephen O'Dell request for a lot split at 20100 Akin Road
I<
e) Authorize the sale of obsolete solid waste dumpsters to Hillcrest Sanitation
in the amount of $1,520
f) Approve purchase of 2 Scott Air Pack Breathing Apparatus for Fire Department
in the amount of $7,972.30
g) Adopt RESOLUTION NO. R78-96 approving the list of election judges and
designating polling places for the 1996 primary election
h) Approve payment of the bills as submitted.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
7. prairie Creek Fourth Addition Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Trunk Sanitary
Sewer
City Planner Tooker informed Council that Metropolitan Council staff was
investigating whether or not a comprehensive plan amendment would be needed for
the trunk sanitary sewer extension, however, they also suggested that the
amendment be adopted anyway. Planner Tooker also stated that the extension would
be discussed at the Empire/Farmington Joint Planning Board meeting. It was noted
that Genstar had granted permission for the sewer to pass through their property
and they were aware that the sewer extension did not predetermine the imminent
development of their property. MOTION by Ristow, second by Gamer to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. R79-96 approving a comprehensive plan amendment for trunk sanitary
sewer extension to serve prairie Creek Fourth Addition contingent upon
Metropolitan Council approval. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
8. Deer Meadow Second Addition Development Agreement
The Council discussed issues related to the approval of the development agreement
for this subdivision. Planner Tooker noted that the Developer had agreed to all
of the terms of the proposed agreement with the exception of the extension of the
date until which traffic signal escrow funds would be held. Mr. Tooker also
noted that the GIS fees were to be $1100 rather than $11,000 as stated in the
agreement. It was Council's consensus that the date for holding traffic light
escrow should not be extended as staff suggested.
Mayor Kuchera opened 3 public hearings scheduled for 7:30 P.M.. The hearings
were continued until later in the meeting.
MOTION by Ristow, second by Gamer to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R80-96 approving the
execution of the development agreement for Deer Meadow Second Addition with ~he
aforementioned changes. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
9. TIF District #11 - Lexington Standard Expansion - Public Hearing
Economic Development Director Henricks informed Council that TIF District #11 was
comprised of Lot 1, Block 2 Farmington Industrial Park, and Lot 1, Block 3,
Farmington Industrial Park 2nd Addition.. The purpose of the request was to
allow Lexington Standard to expand their operations in Farmington. Local
Government Aid penalties would be offset by an annual contribution of 10% of the
increments generated annually ($9,921). There were no comments from the
audience. MOTION by Ristow, second by Gamer to close the public hearing. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Galler, second by Kuchera to ad9~t RESOLUTION NO.
.
R81-96 approving the creation of Tax Increment Financing District #11 for the
Lexington Standard expansion project. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
10. TIF District #12 - Duo Plastics Development - Public Hearing
Economic Development Director Henricks explained Duo Plastic's request to build a
40,000 square foot structure on Lot 2, Block 3 of the Farmington Industrial Park.
They also wish to purchase Lots 3 and 4, Block 3 for future expansion needs. An
annual payment of $5,454 would be required to offset LGA penalties. There were
no comments from the audience. MOTION by Ristow, second by Gamer to close the
public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARR~ED. MOTION by Galler, second by Kuchera to
adopt RESOLUTION NO. R82-96 approving the creation of Tax Increment Financing
District #12 for Duo Plastics development. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
11. Farmington Industrial Park 2nd Addition Plat Approval - Public Hearing
City Planner Tooker provided information regarding the layout of the plat, giving
particular attention to precautions taken to protect wetlands, the Vermillion
River Tributary, and the creation of ponding areas. He also informed Council
that ponding areas on outlots in the plat were dedicated to the City. Economic
Development Director Henricks presented Lexington Standard's request to begin
preliminary work on the construction of their new facility expansion prior to the
approval of a development agreement for this plat. Therefore, Council was being
asked to allow the plat to be recorded before the development agreement had been
prepared and approved. Councilmember Galler noted that since this was an
intergovernmental activity/development such an action could be justified. It was
noted that the HRA will own the property in 1999 and that the current owner,
Bernard Murphy, would need to sign the plat and development agreement. There was
no public comment. MOTION by Ristow. second by Gamer to close the public
hearing. API!', MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Kuchera, second by Galler to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. R83-96 approving the preliminary plat and authorizing the signing
of the final plat of Farmington Industrial Park 2nd Addition with the notation
that due to it being an intergovernmental activity, the plat could be signed and
filed without prior completion of a development agreement, and that Bernard
Murphy needs to sign both the plat and development agreement. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED .
12. Rezoning Lot 9, Block 5, Town of Farmington, and adjoining vacated Locust
Street
Councilmember Ristow vacated his seat at the Council table during discussion of
this item. City Planner Tooker informed Council the request was to rezone the
property from R-3 High Density Residential to R-2 Medium Density Residential in
order to allow the construction of a duplex. He explained that existing housing
in the neighborhood was more consistent with R-2 zoning and that the lot in
question, if rezoned, would be large enough for a duplex. He also informed
Council that following a public hearing, the Planning Commission had recommended
approval. MOT~ON by Fitch, second by Gamer to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 096-376
rezoning Lot 9, Block 5, Town of Farmington, and the adjoining vacated Locust
Street f.rom R-3 High Density Residential to R-2 Medium Density Residential.
VOTING FOR: Kuchera, Galler, Fitch, Gamer. AGAINST: None. ABSTAIN: Ristow.
MOT~ON CARRIED. Council directed Planner Tooker to set a P1anning Commission
public hearing to discuss rezoning Lots 7 and 8, Block 5 plus the adjoining
vacant lot (14-03100-010-63) from R-3 to 2-2 Residential. ~ember Ristow resumed
his seat at the Council table.
13. Rezoning the South One-Half of the Southernmost Building in the P.H. Feely
Cluster from R-3 High Density Residential to B-2 General Business
Planner Tooker explained that during the drafting of the original zoning map in
the 1980s, an error had been made which split this building into two zoning
classifications. MOTION by Galler, second by Fitch to adopt ORDINANCE NO.
096-377 rezoning the south one-half of the southernmost building in the P.H.
Feely Complex from R-3 High Density Residential to B-2 General Business. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED. Additional discussion took place regarding of a 60' x 290' strip
of land between the railroad right-of-way and Second Street which would become an
isolated R-3 zone within a B-2 district. Staff was directed to set a public
hearing before the Planning Commission to consider rezoning this parcel
(14-03100-030-63) from R-3 to B-2.
14. Recycling/Redemption Center Zoning
City Planner Tooker provided background information on the Planning Commission's
decision to forego the establishment of a zoning district for
recycling/redemption centers within the City. Mr. Donn Johnson and Mr. Mark
Urbeck were in attendance to present their position on the zoning request. The
two gentlemen operated a recycling/redemption center prior to its closure by the
City because of violation of the zoning ordinance. Discussion which followed
centered around issues of the City contract for recycling service with Dick's
Sanitation, interference with the open market, and the City's existing solid
waste ordinance. It was the consensus of Council that the issue be referred back
to the Planning Commission to determine appropriate zoning and location, after
which, a public hearing will need to be scheduled. Mr. Johnson requested Council
allow him to reopen his business until such time as the zoning question was
determined. Council denied his request.
15. Comprehensive Sewer Plan
Glenn Cook and Donald Burghardt of Bonestroo. Rosene and Anderlik were present to
provide an overview of the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. The Plan meets Metropolitan
Council requirements, provides for an economical sanitary sewer system,
identifies capital improvement costs, provides a tool for developing assessment
fees, and serves as a blueprint for sanitary sewer expansion in the City. City
Engineer Kaldunski requested that Council adopt the Plan and direct staff submit
it to the Metropolitan Council and neighboring communities for review and
comment. It was noted that the Comprehensive Sewer Plan would become a part of
the overall City Comprehensive Plan. MOTXON by Galler, second by Fitch to adopt
the Comprehensive Sewer Plan as presented and to direct staff to forward the Plan
to the Metropolitan Council and neighboring communities for review and comment.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
16. Wausau NURP Pond Overview
Glenn Cook explained the purpose of the construction of the~waterway system and
the function of NURP ponds in general. Questions regarding maintenance of the
-
-
ponds and the cost of such maintenance were raised, in addition to the planting
of the required vegetation. Mr. Cook explained that the ponds would need to be
dredged at some point in the future, perhaps 5 to 10 years, and then possibly not
again for 20 years. Funding for the maintenance would come from the stormwater
utility fund. The vegetation would be planted soon, but would take some time to
become established. Councilmembers thanked Mr. Cook for his presentation.
17. Dakota Electric Street Light Policy
James Bell, Parks and Recreation Director, stated he had contacted Dakota
Electric Association as Council had directed and was informed that Dakota
Electric has only one rate for street lights. No action was necessary.
18. Final Pool Restoration Budget
Parks and Recreation Director Bell informed Council that the pool restoration
project had been completed and was under budget by $18,641. Council indicated
its pleasure with the result of the restoration work. No action was necessary.
19. Preliminary 1997 Budget
City Administrator Erar presented an overview of the proposed 1997 Budget,
reviewed the document format changes. and noted that there would be no increase
in the City's tax rate with the budget as presented. Council set two workshops
to discuss the budget; the first on August 15th at 7:00 P.M., and the second, if
necessary, on August 21st at 7:00 P.M..
20. LGA Penalty for Soils Condition District No. 1
Administrator Erar stated that the Department of Revenue had denied the City's
request to use of contribution of soils in East Farmington development project as
the local contribution for tax increment financing. Administrator Erar asked the
Council if they wished to appeal the Department's ruling, stating that the City's
bond consultant felt a ruling change was doubtful. It was the consensus of
Council to proceed with sending a letter of appeal and hope for a ruling
reversal. MOTION by Galler, second by Ristow to use TIF Administration fees as
the City's local contribution to the project in the event the appeal was
unsuccessful. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
21. Dakota County Economic Partnership Enterprise Facilitation Project
Economic Development Director Henricks explained the request for City financial
participation in a program to assist people in starting new businesses. The two
year program would require a $5000 per year City contribution. While the Council
felt the program may have value, they questioned whether the City could afford to
invest the funds and whether the City would receive enough benefit to make
participation cost effective. It was also felt that Director Henricks already
performed the same services for businesses considering relocating in Farmington.
MOTION by Ristow, second by Gamer to decline participation in the Dakota County
Economic Partnership Enterprise Facilitation Project. APIF;,'MOTION CARRIED.
22. Southeast Area Resident Survey
Councilmember Galler stated he had placed this item on the agenda because he felt
the City would benefit by receiving feedback on what residents felt about the
prairie Waterway project now that it had been installed. Member Ristow felt that
questions regarding groundwater levels/problems should be avoided since the
project was intended to deal with surface water problems, not groundwater. It
was the consensus of Council to review the questionnaire and forward any
revisions or additional questions for inclusion on the August 19th meeting
packets.
23. Administrative Assistant Finstuen notified Council that Empire Township had
terminated its contract with the City for building inspection services. No
action was required.
24. Due to the Labor Day holiday, the regularly scheduled Council meeting of
September 2nd will be changed to September 3rd.
Council took a 5 minute recess at 10:30 P.M..
25. External Involvement in Internal Organizational Matters
A lengthy discussion took place regarding the extent of Council involvement in
internal personnel issues. While it was understood that issues regarding hiring
and firing of personnel require Council involvement, their input on other
personnel issues needed to be clarified. The possible ramifications of
decreasing or continuing the current level of involvement were argued. The
specific issue at this time was the attendance of Councilmembers at a staff
meeting with the City's EAP Counselor. MOTION by Kuchera, second by Galler to
allow Councilmembers Galler and Ristow to attend, as observers only, the staff
meeting. VOTING FOR: Kuchera, Galler. OPPOSED: Fitch, Gamer, Ristow. MOTION
FAILED.
26. Parks and Recreation Director Bell passed along the PARAC request for a
joint meeting to discuss Park Referendum issues with Council. A special joint
meeting was set for August 19, 1996 at 6:30 P.M..
27. Roundtable
County Land Use Issues - Staff has begun review of the County's
transportation/land use plan and will place the item on the August 19th Council
agenda.
Hardee's Noise/Disturbance - Staff will inform the police Chief of the nature of
the complaint, which is especially problematic on Friday and Saturday evenings.
Railroad Property - Staff was informed that the railroad property had been
cleaned up and looks better than it has in years.
.ri-.
28. Executive Session
MOTION by Ristow, second by Gamer to adjourn into Executive Session at
12:05 A.M.. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Upon recommendation by the City Attorney, discussions relative to the Wausau
Alignment were removed from Executive Session. Councilmember Ristow exited the
Chambers to inform members of the press that Council was back in regular session.
Member Ristow returned to Chambers and indicated that no members of the press or
audience were waiting outside. Council discussed at length the location of the
Wausau fence and issues related to pending litigation. Attorney Grannis
indicated that it may be prudent for the City to relocate the fence per the
agreement, but that the fence be installed as far west as to intersect with
Wausau's existing north/south fence. Pending either the outcome of the
outstanding litigation or prior to the date in the agreement requiring the City
to relocate the same quantity of existing fence, the City would complete the
terms of the agreement. Administrator Erar indicated that the existing fence
line on Wausau's property was approximately 1522 per engineering estimates, and
that any additional fencing installed would be at Wausau's expense. MOTION by
Galler, second by Fitch to relocate the fence as stated. VOTING FOR: Kuchera,
Galler, Fitch, Gamer. ABSTAIN: Ristow. MOTION CARRIED.
29. There being no further business, the Council agreed to adjourn at 1:30 A.M..
Submitted by,
Mary Hanson
Clerk Typist
sb
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City
Administrator 9 ~
FROM: Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Lease Renewal at ABH properties
DATE: August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The City has been leasing the building at 3360 - 220th Street from ABH properties for 3-1/2 years. The
City should renew the lease with ABH properties.
DISCUSSION
The City has leased this building to house the Public Works Department's Solid Waste operations. In
addition, the Street and Utility crew and Park Department utilize portions of the building for storage. This
lease arrangement has worked very well for the City.
A copy of the 1996 lease is attached. Mr. Hansen has proposed to keep all terms of the agreement the same
with an extension of the date to September 30, 1997. The rent will remain at $1, 890/month for 1997.
BUDGET IMPACT
The lease for this building is included in the 1996 and 1997 budgets.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Council approve the extension of the lease with ABH on the property at 3360 - 220th Street until
September 30, 1997.
l1::jiJU
Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
TJKlIl
cc: file, Wayne Henneke, Benno Klotz, Jerry Bauer, Jim Bell, TJK
Dick Hansen, ABH Properties
I
CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street. FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fall' (612) 463.2591
July 22, 1996
Mr. Tom Kaldunski
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Farmington
325 Oak St.
Farmington, MN 55024
Dear Sir;
I am writing regarding the City's lease of our building at 3360 220th St. W.,
Farmington which is presently used by the Solid Waste, Parks & Street Depts. for storage
of trucks and equipment. As you know our present lease expires on Sept. 30th of this
year. The lease calls for a 90 day notice from the parties as to their intentions to renew or
terminate the lease.
We have been very pleased with having the City as a tenant over the past 3 1/2
years, and hope to continue this relationship in the future.
Your prompt reply by phone or letter, regarding the City's plans would be greatly
appreciated.
If you have any questions regarding this please feel free to call me at 747-137l.
Thank you.
J);;fI~
Dick Hansen
ABH Properties
,Ol'i
-:,:.,~~@~@{::
, . :,::.:,.:':{;;:.:,:: RECEMD fROM ..:._.;...c:1.t.y._.o,L.F.ar.m1ngton?_a_Mlnne3ota.-;Munlclpa1-~orpor.at.~onC-:--:-._._-..-_':"':-, :::.,/':<":
W'!.r!i:; -... -'. - . . -== ..~~. ..1m" "U """
L '
. ~~)t:::S;::~ ': In ....1ftlIll/NI ~ It.. h IOlacc.pl.d by lII. les~~i~~ilI ~~UtMiIKXiUl' .'. "', " " :.,II.waass dars. lII~ lal,! ~}~.i"" shall be .r.'~ ~ L~{{{~;:::~::_:,
.,:. :~.,,:;-::::>: '. hssee "relly all.rs 10 Itase rram hssar U" premls.s silualed it u.. tilt ai": :Farin-1ng,t-c>n~ CGUnl, ar:.Dako.ta,':':'Slal. .1,H1-nn- . -:,'.',i.::..(~'i:::;.,:;:-,
, ".,':' ,::::';.:'~:, ' i1escrillelaa _I'.b,EL:t20,-X_50_hu1.~dlng-10cated....on-.t.be-SOl.Lth,-1/.2-Of--the.-Pr..oPe-t'~Y '. . .. ::.::',::.::.:~::\.:::
. ::~};~:<,: , A t 3~2.0.th.-St....:..W~~;"'F.a.cm1nt.Ont- Mn' 'i'i02.!1.-tOgpt her..Jdth.-.t.b.e..;.adJoining :,::/,/,:~}\~)'
.:',?,.;':::(\: 1 ancL.tac....dr..iY.fUlll3.....aluLp.ar.k1n&-~~ shown on thp d1.agr.lUIl-8.t.t.ache.d.....ber..etO :;;;,,:ii'>::;>
",M8i-.;,..:''':::~:;'''.. >Ld-'- ",."," -.. < .,.' .'., ...... ...., .t~~,i{
. "'.;:.::{: ;:: ' 1. TElM: 111. I.,...r..r ,sIlaIl, ~~~ 1110'0' Oc~b~i--~ ' . ;~I:,~5.a andd"~ kKDCcWh~Xt~~~;i-11-":S&P't.rlQilg.96::::(:/:S:':~::"
.' ':',.::.:,::: 2. liNT: The Ialat real shill ... $,..J.l.l.~. ' _p.e~On. "rollows. . Y.anc.e-Oll-t , Lday. . " '-::<::"~.:::.,>
. :i:,:.:,';'::::.;' --DL.each_mon.t.b.~Lesse.e....shall._ha1l~-Qp.tloIL.QL.ex.t.end.1niJ.h!.S-1.eas,e ' . ".".:;::;';; ::':/.:::
',:;':,::;\~:, .--!W-t:1~UO___Wl gp the same..:..t.e.CJDSJ.nd.-c.Qnd.1.U.O.Ds.....:.p,r..onde.cLwcl.Uen' .',::;:':::'~:-:::.::-
,:.':\.::/ ". not1g~ to exten~,L.u-&lyen On'o.r berore_J.ulY..J~_199.6..." ", ". ,.,:'~.::.:,~,,:;..:::/:
,. :':" . ................. " '""".. Y. _.... ;;;:; .:. "_ .....'-.H~~...,.cl.Q~""-]......_esgao.JlrL5Sl22_- ''/',1(,;:;'
.-:'.'::.0
. - ..... ,0.
i{Z~1,
...... ~:."!....~..~....:
. ;. ~.';:' .::~ =..:~.~geJlndJla1nta..,ULY,,"!'l.c1..,..u:q=-== .;'mWftr
;;;;ToiIO~pOsi. ,it""'-I prior ",llIea COIlSlllI .r l.SSII.' .. . ....'..:
.4. USES PlOHI.tTED: l.sse. shan 101 .s. iny parliao or lilt p.enlis.s lor purposes .lller l\aan IIaose specilied h.;.ill.IIo... and III llSI shall lie 1IlId. If peelllllled
10 lie .... .. \Ile prltllhes. _ acls dan.. whicll wilt Incr.ase lb. ..islille rate or ~ 1lpOlI\be p......I'. If cause _nallon OIInWfanc. polides coveriac
said ...,.,1,. lessee sIlaIl lOt conduct o. pe.noilany' sal.1ly ailcl!on Oft tile ......,. . ' ' , . ".
S. ASSIGNMENT AND SU.LETTING: hss.. shall 101 assi... \IIis tease If subltl any pillion aI \Ile .......ses wilhoul prior w.ill.n consent or Ih. lessor, ..iell
shall lOt lie ....nonably wllll\leld. All, sucll assi........1 If. subI.lliRc willlaul _seal shalIlle waid ... .1 \Ile apliol'l aI lb. lesSCll'. Ila, I....nal. Ibis leas.. .
6. ORDINANCES AND ST A TUn,S: hsse. shall CGIl\IIt willi atl slalules. .dioances aod reqUi._nts .1 all _icipat. slalr aad r....ral aul\lorilles - In rarce.
01 whicII .., "'ull" ... Ia Iorce. pertalainc to \be pr..lisn. ~caslaoed II, .. allaclille a. me lJIet'" II, lessee. Tb. -'llCIllllnl ar pencIencY .r any sial. ·
ledlflll _I ......... proceediac a1laclllll .... .se .r Ill. PllwseS shall, .1 .. eplioll aI .. lessor. ... de.... allt.adl h.r..r.. .
7. MA,"TENANC'. IEPAIIS. ALTERATIONS: lessee aclnowledces "'1 \Ile .._lIS.' it ",.der and repair. unI.ss .lIIrrwise ladlcaled herein. lesse. shall,
al Itis _ .....se ... at all \IoIes. ...... \he. pr_ses Ia ... and sal. __lioll, itcIIditc eleclrical .wIrilll. p1umbinC and ...II8C itsIallallons ..... any olb.r
1J'l.. .. ....... .. \Ile pr_1IS and shall sunlJlCllf lII. -. at ......Iion ..r.... Ia _ ... -'itioIi " rec.lv.... -... ...'and I.ar eaceplttl: lessee shall
n . lie rlSjlGllSlli. fat ......s ....... ~Clpu.c Ill. .r..QQ.!... s trucural . ~Ril1riL..:...Qr.-r.eRla~e.OI.e.Dt~gt_.any.-=-- . .
. heat1ngvent11at1ng gr a1r...sondlt1on1~qulDment.."" -,:-', "'.' .... ...' ,
..II.t.I,.,
puleose allnspecllrIc \Ile .... IIllI win pe..l lrSSllal any .....wiIWa SIlly I&Ot dayS ..III .. ... PJlnlion aI ...is IlIse. to plac. .. Ill. prttalsrs lIlY IIsuaI .To
l.1 .. '1" lease- slcls, ind pennll pee_ ...sililIe .. lease tIle._ to itsprd .... ....... ....111".. .' " . -- ...... ' . ,
~.::m=Ir!=.,~umamammm~fm':J''''''''IO_I'l!lI- +::tiikt
10. POSSESSIONI fllSSllls . la !,.... Possession of lII. prerolsrs at \Ile _ .-of ..r.... lesSlll shall 101 ... lIaIll. r.. any danIaC. caused lII..."'. '::':."{::::;~:;<""
!III shall ,1Ilis ~_.'" wid.. woldabI.. \uI lessee shall 101 .. 11abIa.1or any rill ..m pouesslaa Is deliver.... lesse. uia, I.rminal. Ibis Itase !I pouesslon is 101 del;" : ",:,::::,':.::',:.',>,
tied wilbia ":"'I~ 4ays allII. canfteat.....1 " DI. lef~ lie..... ",: c: 't " '
11. INSUUNCE: less." .Uis .lpensi.shaII...... pu\ll'1C \labiUl, .... praperlJ .....1. iesUi_ lMurille lessee ~nd lessor wilb Iliaa- ClWrral' as Iallaws: :./::f:)::,:,'
:"'-'---"':'LeS-SOIt-Shall-lDa1nt.a1nJ.n_alL.r.1.s!c...;1nsur.ancEY>0l1c-y_.on.:.the-bulld1ng.----.- '::.::~;~>,:::"
.. ,if! the..:.amou.nLoL.s.1.o.0.,.QOO..,OO_.&.j,1.ab~ll.tY..=.1.DSU~a,nce._cov.ecage-t.or.-Lessor--- , ,;:~"/:':"\':'
" ~l.LJ1LS30.Q."OQo.~Q.....;-:..' , ' -'.' . , , ," ,., " . , . ';. ;::::;,<: :
IIIWIUIWuaulll'Umftl~lJ~X,Kli~tG~~~~~,~;)(dC\IlJGl6i6"D(Jo~KIEI1G~K-l6:toX~~~~l6OC, ,:, ":'};.::(:':':"
, T........... pt... ,.rMltle4 '" Iasur.. policies ..icII.., lie ......11' ~en.. ..lessee. lessee aod lessar. rlf ttie.....lIt aI ",ell other. wohe any and an ,::,:~.~:.:.,(; :.".
rlchls ai_opt... w\Ildl...... .lhetwlse"1IL , ' "' " , ,., ;'.' . '.' -'" .-~" T', - , ' '. ',' .':,;".,.:...
u. VTILn,:IES:, lessee .,.~ ....1 he Ihatt 1Ie'lIspIIIs8Ire ... lII. ,~ .'" ~ ~Iillties. ...... wall.. aas.' .Iechlcil;. heal ~,olber Setftces dellve.... to'" -)\-:)::'Y:;
prlMlsn. ~',,:.,:;, h.':"'~-'" .":' -,",'."'''' .!-~ . ,.-~,'," '-' ". ."';' .' -- -- .,.. ' ".,' ,<,:..-,;.~.;:.,:.:"
13: SIGNS: 1.SSII'1SII1IS ... ..clasl" rlchl to ... ...r. slde .. Itll walls aI ~'!r~lu.sie sW 101 ~slluct ..., ..~Jecilnc ,slC. .. _InC wlthoul u.. ,,::\:/~::,~::,~..
prill .1Il.. __ " llSllll whlcIl COIISIlII shalllIlIIlIe ....-.., tn1hlleld."..... ~.. ,.,!!f:t~:"">;';:' "..,,;, ,..,,:.:,;., .,:,',)"".:,"~. . -.: -,',,~ ..,::,..:,::::,.'
14. AIANDONM.NT'O. 'IIMISESI lessee shall lit .... .r ...... ...,..lIIhes II a.y ........tnc'... I... ...'!". and II liuee,shaII ........ If wacal. ....';'-.,<:/:::}"':,:',
, .'., .._.,.:......~ .', _ .........IIe.......-1ly precess aI taw... .......... ..., 1I'!~".,..1t ......... .. lessee IeII .... .... .._.ses shall ... denied 10 lie lit........ .1 die...;.,...;...,..,' ,
, ' ::~::...:;.:::::~:}.~: :;., ~,epl_ aI. teSSII. ).;: ,p:ir.~t~:.-+'.'j." ,'t';. ,,' (.c:; '-: ;:,;;;..,:~;"::;'!t.1:~,:""f.~'f.,~:t.:.,~:c"'$:: :"?;~.:':'1'~i"':'=:'~':'''C!<;7';'-:':'':::7'*,f;,~;:,.~/';'~:~'~'';''~;~4'7}i;.:!;.;!;:.,:;.''::';'~~;.:::::;
..,,:::-,::~.::::.::: ,.,~, 'U.COND.M.JmOIIt . ..., pt .. ... ~ .. ... ...... ~ III .... -. ... . ,.1 ...... r.....s whlcIt Is suscept.... .r occupallllll ...... -":', ,:,:.:::,::..':"-:::::
. .. o:.:.~,:.;::-..:::::::::.,~.....:: .......1IlIs tease ..... .. to ... ,.1 .... 1......1. " " \Ile ..Ii......., ocqU/Ies..__ aod .....an., l.sse. shall ... ....1IlI .. pay - prapar""':'?":;'=-::>:::'::::":'"
, ..., '::'::.i,::....:;..::.,::; ''''c'{; .. 1M .iat ... ... ...... .... IS \Ile ... all\Ie pr_ses ....... ...s to ... ..... ... It ... prlJBlses .1 \Ile dal. aI :and....~ll.... ..owilIed --. ...11.:.~-:::.:.:.:y: ::'<
;;;,.;;:,:':;::':.::;~~:::~,. :,~ISSII"" at Ills............... this ..ase_ aI 1M Al~ 1Ie....- acquires possessie&, II ............1 \Ile deIlIIsIIlI pr~ Ir' ~ III......... tIIat :;'~,,:~:..::~!~::;,::::'"
.' ';_: ;:::~:-.,:,.~:r-: . "/' SIICIl "'liarIls......... .... ... ,........ Is aot IDSCIPtillIe ... '" ........ tWs tease sial ....... .. 1M dal. IIpalI Wh!dt .... .....- aqulres ,..sessIaL U~\,;';:'.:::::..: ,',:,
~,:.:::;'::_'::'.:::$::':~ ,.:. All __ wlIidl""'" ,.,.... . ac-' aI .., ~I'!N' shall..... II \Ile leSSlll. aM ~.gan 101 tie ",illed to .., 'pari Iller.... prowldetl --. lhal. ;;;:.~:~':::;!;.;::::.::
,.:...:~;;..:~.:::.:~;:;:,' , . lessee shatI_ IIiUtW ~ relail IIIJ -' awarded II ... fat ,Ills ,". &alii"....... ~ ~;~~:',,~:.:,: ,~~",~;~.,~:'~\~~~;~':>Yt'jli;,t'.i: :'f:~..~;rr~:::::':i:::::.:.:.;
, ,:.~:i :=:::):';':,:.:: '16. TIADE ftXTUIES:1Irr Ind all ..,.~.....s ..... 'Ii." ,;~ .........'......~ ~...... to \Ile leisel. elCipIIr~ OaIures aI"'lesseo.lrssee ':~:::::::~;::::::
'-'::::.:'i.':':,: ...,..... .................1- a111tis II. n.lur","1 shatI..,..... '" ... all nparrs.....r lor danrales to ",. pllMISIS ~sIaMd Ily r..-al,.<;--',.;;,:::::;:-::,,::::::
.;'.:':.:':--::, n. DEStlUCTIOH O' 'IEMISES: Ia \Ile IftlIl ala ,.rltal...stnrcUaa aI ... prtnIlsrs"lIe .. .... ....... r.... any -. lnsar shall r.l/IWIllI repair the :'~,;:;.::~,::;.::,::;.
:'.::;'.:.~';:::.: -. pIftIdIIlI tIIaI_ r"'s cao... ~ willlill sialJ t&Ot days lIIIde! alslilll-.~ 1 '11 laws ... ..I!"a'- Ilul suc\I ,.,UaIdeslnrc\lall shall lOt !If..... ,,~,,:,.:,,':::;':::.:
, .' :;.::;,',:::::;. ' \IIis ..... IICIpt .... lessee. shall lie ...it.... .. . pr....llauI. reduc\iGII II r." wIriIe ... .....s ... IIeirIC ..... used .. 1M ...... to wIIicII lII. IIIliIII aI' ,,'.:'.~':,.::.': ::':,:
,':;.::;'.:;"::': sudI fltialrs'" ..."......1II...1IIrslMu aI lessee. 1M prrmses. u... r."n a..e lie.... willlla saiII sialy 1&01 dars. lesSlf. at Ws option...., .....lII. ::'".:.,>:.:.,:-,".
;:. ".::.::::.':..".:. _ wiUlirl. re__ I.... tills Ime.'" ill efleel willi ....... ......llouIeIy 1IIaIIIlI~ oflfesaW, aod Ia \Ile _I lIIat lesSlll shaH _I .Iect II..... ,.,;:.:';:::::':.,':::
, ',.,::::....: sur:II rl\lllrs wWcII -' tie .... wilIIIa sblJ lOt ..", IIlIs ..ase ..., ... .....1... of ...,lion.. eilIIIr ,.,It. ' . .', , .: ,:..::.';:;:- ','
)::..::.:;:: II... ..... ~ ... ~ II wIIlcII ... .....sed ~rMlsrs .., ... sIluaIlIlI h .slr"'" .. . ..I'" aI ... less lIIM _lIIlrd of ... r~1 cosls \lief.... . ::, ,::.:;<,:::,:
".. ',' .:.,~':-::':~:>:: llSSll...,...""'.. .......... \llis lease w\IeIIIrf.... ....se,oI..~s ..,....14.. .... A..... .,....- aI ... llooildilll '" "IdI, \Ile ....lIS -, lie silualed sIIall :.- ;'::':!:~;~:::'
........ ,'.' .".. !If...... _s ase. ' . ....,., .,....
....: ... '::::::.:;::.:~::':':'::. II lie ..... .. ..., ............ lessor .... less" wllll'especI .. .. ..",sIorIs ...... .. _U" shalt lie sellled lIy .."ill"_ In sacII...- " the petlles .;-<:.:.,:~,',:::.::::
.' "),;:,;,;::r::::"::;:;,:; IIIIY IIr.. ..... .. IIII1cf c_IaC.... Ia accordanc. .illl "" Nles aI .... a.rrlc. .Ai.ur..... AsSllCialIoo.. · :'::::;~:=::.~.0?
, " ... ".,". .. .......'II.Nn. ,.. lhe ....nlIbalI .ecelv., shalllle appolllled I...... ~r \be.1lus1oess aI \Ile hurr.. i1lhe ...enllh.llhe lessee sh.1H ..... . I_at ISsie'" :-::::.:.:~::.::'::::
_.. .._..... ......~......t_ ~..t n.. ......,. ch,dl romtih..I. bre.1C'h 01 U.lt leu. by lessee. . :":::/::::.
" .,::)f1+:~~~;
..- 0...
:-;.;~. e.'
......... .
~ .... .:......
".: ;:::.:. ".
.- :-. :.:...:........
COMMERCIAl'tEASE AND DEPOSIT RECEIPT
\w:
--
"All""""(
\-.
~1'j;~ll!i~(r~~~~,~~;~t~;~~ftii;::;j{~~~:..
":':';'~~',,,":',,~_~_;, '" ,~,';'4~'''-' ~";';;-'" '~-"", ".-C"+'/IJ ( ",',,"';;;e,=,' ''',:L',::','- "", ,-, ,;'"
, " ,:-,;, ',- ;/':/ t1 - ;;...?--o /1 .U/l '.:". :;',.",.-- "."
~:-- ....IJP/fJrof~r I~ .. ' ..
',' ~.:",
~ '~;'.:>_;: (~C,'::- .F:~"~-i-'
~,,; ~::'s,:-{,--~ ...:....:.
..~
"
, ,
- /lorth
'iJ d,/rflil~'
'--
.'
";'.'1.:'
-',-
..-,.-
. ,
-'
; .r.;:" ~1::": ,'w' ;~,.._ ~."':'
~.t~.. _,
. < ...~ - 'r: -"
.~.~I
?:'''.
~,,:~...;,~...~_... .~. -. .,.
,0 "'.~_-"-T':..l>~'-
~-_~'::.~,.:... ;.." f
Y,"'':J
-.~' .....
.~.' , .
~..,~:'~,. . ~:....., ',~'
':.
..........
..;.....-:-.
~."-~':~~1"
~.: 4.
J
',' .-.
..... ".
.'
.t.
" ..-
..
--.,.
'"
5c--
FROM:
Mayor, Councilmem~~
City Administrator j7 <-
Wayne Henneke, Finance Director
TO:
SUBJECT:
Approve Solicitation ofRFP's for
City Auditing Firm
DATE:
August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The City of Farmington has been using the same auditing firm since 1968. Approval to
solicit RFP's for a new City Auditing Firm is being requested.
DISCUSSION
Malloy, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co. P.A. has performed the annual audit for the City
since 1968. The firm started out as Anfinson, Hendrickson & Co. and has changed names
and partners since that time. Malloy, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co. has provided the
City with a good professional service over the years.
After the RFP's are returned to the City from the auditing firms, staffwill review and
interview prospective firms. After the interview process, staff will present a
recommendation to Council to contract with a new firm to conduct the City's annual
audit.
BUDGET IMPACT
N one at this time. The City paid $31,460 in 1995 for total auditing services including the
H.R.A. and Water Board audit.
ACTION REQUIRED
Authorize City staff to solicit RFP's for auditing services.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
Wayne E. Henneke
Finance Director
I
Citlj of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street · FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fax (612) 463.2591
To: .\.-Iavor and City Council
City Administr~tor ~
I
From: Gerald A. Henricks
HRA Executive Director
,-
!
'~
.~)G
~ I Subject: Duo Plastics
o~ <<.~
'() ,0 "....,f::> D
-"'sreA PRO~\S\'''' ate: August 19, 1996
I
Duo Plastics company requests the use of Industrial Revenue Bonds for the purpose of
financing the construction of it expansion in Farmington.
Discussion
Duo Plastics is constructing a 40,000 square foot facility in the Farmington Industrial
Park. The company requests the City Council to authorize the use of Industrial Revenue
Bonds in 1997 to finance the construction. The size of the Industrial Revenue Bond for
the Duo Plastics project is approximately $2,000,000. The use of Industrial Revenue
Bonds by Duo Plastics will not require the City to dedicate its taxing capabilities to
support the debt service for the Industrial Revenue Bond.
The proc~dure for the use of Industrial Revenue Bonds is as follows:
1. August 19,1996 City passes resolution for the use of Industrial Revenue Bonds by
Duo Plastics
2. November 1,1996 HRA Director/Company and bond counsel complete IRB
application for the State of Minnesota
3. December 30,1996 Company submits to City the 1 % deposit for the use oflRB's
and the application fee
City of Farmington writes a check for the 1 % deposit and the
application fee to the State of Minnesota then submits the
application and checks to the Department of Finance.
State of Minnesota Department of Finance awards the IRB' s
4. January 2,1997
5. January 16,1997
Financial Impact
No financial impact for the City.
Action Request
The City Council is requested to pass a motion approving the attached resolution
authorizing the use of Industrial Revenue Bonds by Duo Plastics.
Respectfully Submitted,
~~,~
Gerald A. Henricks
HRA Executive Director
CitlJ. 'of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street · FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fall' (612) 463.2591
Councilmember
its adoption:
introduced the following resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROV AL TO
THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS PURSUANT TO
MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152-469.165,
ON BEHALF OF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Farmington,
Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals
1.1 (the "Company") has advised this
Council of its desire to undertake a project in the City(hereinafter, the "Project")
consisting of the construction and equipment of an approximately 40,000 square foot
addition adjacent to its existing manufacturing facility located on Highway 50 in the
Farmington Industrial Park. The Project would be used in connection with the
Company's business of . The estimated
total cost of the Project, including financing costs and contingencies, is approximately
$2,000,000. The Company has requested the City consider the issuance of revenue
bonds, in a principal amount not to exceed $2,000,000, to assist in the financing of the
Project.
1.2 The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152
through 469.165 (the "Act"), to issue its revenue bonds (the "Bonds") to finance capital
projects consisting of properties used and useful in connection with a revenue-producing
enterprise engaged in the fabricating, manufacturing, storing and warehousing of
manufactured products.
1.3 One completed it is anticipated that the Project would add
approximately new jobs to the City and State, and would add to the tax base
of the City and overlapping taxing jurisdictions. The Company has represented to the
City that the issuance of the Bonds is essential to the successful completion of the
Project.
.:-i
SECTION 2
Preliminary Approval of Bond Financin~
2.1 On the basis of the information given the City to date, preliminary
approval is hereby given to the issuance of the Bonds, in an amount not to exceed
$2,000,000, to finance the costs of the Project. The adoption of this resolution shall not
be deemed, however, to establish a legal obligation on the part of the City or its Council
to issue or to cause the issuance of the Bonds. All details of the Bonds and the provisions
for payment thereof shall be subject to final approval of this Council prior to their
issuance. The Bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal
or equitable, upon any property of the City, except the revenues specifically pledged to
the payment thereof, and each Bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that
the Bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues and property
specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt or pecuniary
liability of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation.
2.2 The Company has represented to the City that it intends to reimburse
costs with respect to the Project from the proceeds of the Bonds when issued. The City
reasonably expects to reimburse costs of the Project with proceeds of the Bonds, when
issued, based upon the representations of the Company on which the City believes it is
reasonable to rely.
2.3 At such time as the Company is prepared to proceed with the
issuance of the bonds, the Mayor and City Administrator, in consultation with the
Company, are authorized to executed the necessary documents on behalf of the City to
apply for an allocation of bonding authority for the Project pursuant to the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, 474A.
2.4 At such time as the Company is prepared to proceed with the
issuance of the Bonds, the City Administrator, in consultation with the Company and
bond counsel for the City, is authorized to prepare and publish a notice of hearing on the
issuance of the Bonds as required by Section 469.154 of the Act and Section 147(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Adopted this 19th day of August, 1996.
Mayor, Eugene "Babe" Kuchera
Attest:
City Administrator
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember
following voted in favor thereof:
and, upon vote being taken thereon, the
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
.:;
T
5e-
FROM:
Mayor, Councilmembers ~.-/
City Administrator f~ ~
Wayne Henneke, Finance Director
MEMO TO:
SUBJECT:
Establish 1996 Budget for Library
and Idea School
DATE:
August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The City is responsible for the maintenance of the LibrarylIdea School building. The
attached adjustment to the 1996 Budget allocates funding for this activity.
DISCUSSION
When the 1996 Budget was established it was anticipated the cost of maintaining the
library building could be funded by moderately increasing line items within the budget.
Staff recommends the establishment of a budget within the General Fund to provide the
accounting and funding of Library and Idea School transactions.
BUDGET IMPACT
The attached Library and Idea School Budgets provides funding for the activities.
Idea School
All expenses of the Idea School are reimbursable by School District 197. The budget for
the Idea School provides funding for a part time janitor, materials & supplies, utilities,
equipment maintenance/rental and the security system serving the School.
Librat:}'
Personnel Services for the library include janitorial and maintenance services provided by
City staff, a part time janitor to provide janitorial services when the full time employee is
on paid leave, and benefits.
Operating Expenses include Materials & Supplies, Utilities, Equipment
Maintenance/rental and the security system serving the library.
Funding for the library maintenance is as follows:
. Salary allocation adjustment from Streets and Swimming Pool - City Staff
. Idea School lease payments to City
. One possible budget adjustment which exceeds the existing 1996 General Fund
Budget are costs associated with utility expenses. It is anticipated, based on staff
utility costs analysis, that an adjustment of $5,300 may be needed. This adjustment
will be presented to Council later on this year.
CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street. FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fall' (612) 463.2591
..
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended to approve the attached budget for the Library and Idea School, and
approve the budget adjustments re-allocating salaries from Streets and Swimming Pool
to the library.
Respectfully submitted,
f:?~~
Finance Director
c.c. Jim Bell, Parks & Recreation Director
Tom Kaldunski, Public Works Director
,r;
s
Funding Sources
1996 PROPOSED BUDGET
LIBRARY/IDEA SCHOOL
SUMMARY
Budget Adjustments from Streets & Pool
salary allocation adjustment
Idea School Lease
Idea School Reimbursements
Possible budget adjustment in October, 1996 - Utility Costs
Total Funding Sources
Expenditures
Library
Personnel Services
Operating Expenses
Contracted Services
Total Library
Idea School
Personnel Services
Operating Expenses
Contracted Services
Total Idea School
Total Library/Idea School Expenditures
20,822
13,043
10,757
5,374
49,996
20,684
17,924
631
39,239
4,598
5,769
390
10,757
49,996
,
"
Sf
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City
Administrator qjV
I
FROM: Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Project 93-15, S.E. Sanitary Sewer
DATE: August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
This project is complete and the contractor has requested final payment.
DISCUSSION
Attached is a copy of the fmal payment voucher for this project. Richard Knutson, Inc., has
completed all requirements on this project, and an inspection has been completed.
BUDGET IMPACT
The amount of the final payment is $47,479.30. This project was completed at $70,423.34 under
the original budget.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council accept this project as complete and authorize the final payment to Richard
Knutson, Inc. in the amount of $47,479.30.
Respectfully Submitted,
~L1f1J
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
TJK/ll
cc: file, John Erar, Wayne Henneke, Donajo Heikes, Rich Schindler, Rosemary Swedin, TJK
I
CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street. FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fall' (612) 463.2591
Date:
Contract Number:
Contractors Name:
PAYMENT VOUCHER
8/13/96
93-15
Description:
Voucher Number:
'.
~
5 - final
SE Area Sanitary Sewer
12585 Rhode Island Ave. So.
Savage, MN 55378
Contractors Address:
Richard Knutson, Inc.
Amount of Contract
Increases to Contract
Total of Contract
Percent of Contract Completed
Total Value of Work Completed
Retained Percentage 4%
Total Previous Payments
Net Payment this Voucher
I hereby recommend payment of the above net amount
Invoice Voucher
P.O. No.:
Rec'd By:
Price OK:
Acct. No.:
Posted By:
Paid By:
Date:
Chk. No.:
$ 717,509.13
$ (77,605.93)
$ 639,903.20
100.0%
$ 647,085.79
$
$ 599,606.49
$ 47,479.30
~/UtJ
Name
Title Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Date
8/13/96
5/1/95
7/31/95
135 days
100.0%
*If not in work days, project to completion date.
** The project has been substantially completed at
this time.
day of , 1995.
Starting Date
Total Time Allowed*
Time Used to Date
** Percent of Time Used
Approved for payment by the City Council this
Distribution:
Clerk/Administrator
Contractor
Auth. Officer
Contract File
.l;
INSPECTION FORM
DATE A~g,ust,19, 1996
CONTRACT NO.
93-15
PROJECT NO. 93-15
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
S.E. Sanitary Sewer
HAVE THIS DATE INSPECTED THE WORK PERFORMED ABOVE BY
Richard Knutson, Inc.
PRIME CONTRACTOR.
IN MY OPINION HE HAS SUBSTANTIALLY FULLFILLED THE TERMS OF HIS CONT-
RACT AS TO APPARENT WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS AND I RECOMMEND THAT A
CERTIFICATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE BE PREPARED AND SUBt~ITTED TO THE CON-
TRACTOR FOR HIS EXECUTION.
I FURTHER RECOMMEND THAT UPON RECEIPT OF SUCH CERTIFICATE A FINAL
PAYMENT BE MADE TO THE CONTRACTOR.
~/~
(NAME)
City Engineer/Director of Public Works
(TITLE)
August 19, 1996
(DATE)
MOTION BY SECOND BY
THAT ABOVE RECOMMENDATION IS HEREBY APPROVED. MOTION CARRIES THIS
DAY OF " 19 '
cc: Engr or Proj Hgr
Contract Fi le
Ins. Co.
CLERK
TO:
~ayor,Councilpe~s~
City Administrato/ '--
James Bell, Parks ,and
Recreation Director
FRO~:
SUBJECT:
Private Brush Removal by
City Staff.
DATE:
August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Council requested staff to research information on issues related to the City removing
private brush from the City boulevards.
DISCUSSION
Staff requested information from Lakeville, Eagan and the League of Minnesota Cities.
The League did not have any information on this subject, but did send a sample nuisance
ordinance, which appears to be inappropriate. Lakeville and Eagan do not handle any
brush from private property under normal circumstances. However, Lakeville will
remove brush in an emergency situation.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests Council continue the policy of City staff not picking up private brush from
the boulevards or alleys.
If Council would like to consider removing private brush in an emergency situation,
perhaps a definition of an emergency would be beneficial to the process. An emergency
brush situation could occur when the Public Safety Officer declares one to exist. Then
and only then would staff proceed to remove private generated brush.
Respectfully submitted,
,J_ ~JC6sQ
James Bell
Parks and Recreation Director
I
CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton
53
325 Oak Street. FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fax (612) 463.2591
Sh
FROM:
Mayor, Councilmembers, ~
and City Administrator/~_
Daniel Siebenaler, Chief of Police
TO:
SUBJECT:
Emergency Disaster Declaration
DATE:
August 19, 1996
Introduction
As a result of the June 29, 1996, storm, Dakota County has been
declared a disaster area.
Discussion
The June 29th storm that passed through parts of Dakota County
including Farmington, resulted in property damage to both public
and private sectors.
Although total damage in Farmington did not reach the severity of
some other areas, the City is included in the disaster declaration.
As a result, the City of Farmington may be eligible for a
reimbursement of storm related expenses. In addition residents who
suffered damage to private property may also be eligible for
relief.
Staff will follow through with necessary application procedures and
keep the City Council advised.
Action Reauired
None. Information only.
Respectfully submitted,
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
DMS/m
CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street · FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fall' (612) 463.2591
Introduction
51
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and
City Administrator~
FROM: Daniel M. Siebenaler, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Emergency Evacuation Agreement
with LaPetite Academy
DATE: August 19, 1996
The City of Farmington has received a request from Lapetite Academy
(FAA Day Care Facility) to use City facilities as an emergency
evacuation point.
Discussion
Staff has been contacted by representatives of Lapetite Academy to
use the City garage as an emergency evacuation point. After
continued discussion, it was felt that the garage would be an
inappropriate location for more than very short term situations.
In seeking a longer term evacuation point, staff reached the
conclusion that the Senior Citizens Center would be the best
option. In the event of an emergency, children would be evacuated
to the City Garage where transportation would be immediately
arranged to relocate children to the Senior Center for longer term
evacuation.
The City Facilities would only be used in the event of a life
threatening emergency at the Day Care. It would only be during
regular business hours, and would last only long enough to contact
parents and release children to them.
Lapetite Academy has offered a "hold harmless" contract
indemnifying the City. This evacuation plan does meet with my
approval as Emergency Management Coordinator for the City of
Farmington.
Budqet Imoact
There will be no expense to the City of Farmington.
I
Citl}. of FarminlJ.ton
.ri..
325 Oak Street · FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fax (612) 463.2591
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator
August 19, 1996
Page 2 of 2
Action Reauired
Subject to review and approval by the City Attorney, authorize the
City of Farmington to enter into an emergency evacuation agreement,
including a hold harmless clause, with LaPetite Academy.
Respectfully submitted,
~45:L-J~
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
DMS/m
.::
5-
~
FROM:
Mayor, Councilmembers,
City Administrator~~
Charles Tooker, City planner
TO:
SUBJECT:
Development Agreement for
Farmington Industrial Park
2nd Addition
DATE:
August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The preliminary plat for Farmington Industrial Park 2nd Addition was approved at
the August 5th Council meeting. This request is to approve and authorize the
signing of the Developer's Agreement.
DISCUSSION
The 2nd Addition, like Phase One of the Industrial Park, uses a standard
development agreement. Both include the option of paying water area, storm
sewer, sanitary sewer and park assessments listed in Appendix A at the time the
building permits are issued. They both also include the use of a cash escrow,
to be deposited at the First National Bank of Farmington, as surety.
ACTION REQUIRED
Adopt a resolution approving the development agreement and authorizing the
signing of both the agreement and the escrow agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
{lfJ., If! ~~
Charles Tooker
City Planner
ct4
I
CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street · FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fall' (612) 463.2591
PRO P 0 SED
RESOLUTION
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
- Farmington Industrial Park 2nd Addition -
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the City Council
of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City
on the 19th day of August, 1996 at 7:00 P.M..
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following:
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the City Council the Farmington
Industrial Park 2nd Addition preliminary plat and the signing of the final plat
were approved contingent upon, among other things, the signing of a development
agreement; and
WHEREAS, a development agreement is now before the Council for its
consideration setting forth, among other things, the following:
Surety
Surface Water Management Fees
Water Main Trunk Area Charge
Sanitary Trunk Sewer Area
Park Dedication
$ 722,654.00
$ 115,256.77
$ 31,200.13
$ 32,254.53
$ 14,060.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The aforementioned developer's agreement, a copy of which is on file in
the Clerk's office, is hereby approved.
2. The Mayor and Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to sign such
agreement and to sign the escrow agreement attached thereto.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open
session on the 19th day of August, 1996.
Mayor
Attested to the
day of August, 1996.
SEAL
Clerk/Administrator
.r:
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
AGREEMENT dated this 12th day of August 1996, by and between the City of Farmington,
a Minnesota municipal corporation (CITY) and Farmington Housing and Redevelopment
Authority, a Minnesota corporation (DEVELOPER).
1. Re~est for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat
for Farmington Industrial Park 2nd Addition (also
referred to in this Development Contract [CONTRACT or AGREEMENT] as the PLAT). The
land is legally described as:
That part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25, Township 114,
Range 20. lying north of the plat of Farmington Industrial Park, according to the
United States Government Survey thereof and situated in Dakota County, Minnesota.
2. Conditions of Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on the condition that:
a. the Developer enter into this Agreement; and
b. the Developer provide the necessary security in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement.
3. Development Plans. The Developer shall develop the plat in accordance with the
following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this
Agreement. The plans may be prepared by the Developer, subject to City approval,
after entering into this Agreement but before commencement of any work in the plat.
If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, subject to paragraphs 6
and 31G, the plans shall control. The required plans are:
Plan A - Final Plat
Plan B - Final Soil Erosion Control and Grading Plans
Plan C - Landscape Plan
Plan D - Zoning/Development Map
Plan E - Wetlands Mitigation as required by the City
Plan F - Final Street and Utility Plans and Specifications
1
Developer shall use its best efforts to assure timely application to the utility
companies for the following utilities: underground natural gas, electrical, cable
television, and telephone.
4. Sales Office Re~irements. At any location within the plat where lots and/or
homes are sold which are part of this subdivision,
the Developer agrees to install a sales board on which a copy of the approved plat,
final utility plan and a zoning map or planned unit development plan are displayed,
showing the relationship between this subdivision and the adjoining neighborhood.
The zoning and land use classification of all land and network of major streets
within 350 feet of the plat shall be included.
5. Zoning/Development Ma.p. The Developer shall provide an 8 1/2" x 14" scaled map
of the plat and land within 350' of the plat containing
the following information:
a. platted property;
b. existing and future roads;
c. future phases;
d. existing and proposed land uses; and
e. future ponds.
6. Re~ired Public Improvements. The Developer shall install and pay for the
following:
a. Sanitary Sewer Lateral System h. Sidewalks and Trails
b. Water System (trunk and lateral) i. Site Grading and Ponding
c. Storm Sewer j . Traffic Control Devices
d. Streets k. Setting of Lot & Block Monuments
e. Concrete Curb and Gutter l. Surveying and Staking
f. Street Signs m. Landscaping. Screening, Blvd. Trees
g. Street Lights
.~i
2
The improvements shall be installed in accordance with Plans A through F, and in
accordance with City standards, ordinances and plans and specifications which have
been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer furnished to the City
and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits
from the Metropolitan Council and other agencies before proceeding with construction.
The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection
personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the
Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the
approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City
may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City
inspector(s) and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part time basis. The
Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting at a mutually
agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the
City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within sixty (60) days
after the completion of the improvements and before the security is released, the
Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "As Built" plans.
The Developer shall also supply the City with a 3.5" diskette containing the
following information in an Autocad Release 12 compatible format (.dwg or .dxf
files) :
- approved plat
proposed utilities (storm sewer. water main, sanitary sewer)
- layer names should be self explanatory. or a list must be
included as a key.
If the Developer does not provide such information, the City will digitize the data.
All costs associated with digitizing the data will be the responsibility of the
developer.
7. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required public
improvements by October 31, 1997. The Developer may,
however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it
shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect
cost increases.
3
8. Ownership of Improvements. Upon the completion of the work and construction
required to be done by this Agreement, the
improvements lying within public easements shall become City property, except for
cable TV, electrical, gas, and telephone, without further notice or action.
9. Warranty. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by
it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty
workmanship. The warranty period for streets is one year. The warranty period for
underground utilities is two years. If all improvements are installed by one
contractor, the warranty period shall commence after the final wear course has been
completed and the streets have been accepted by City Council resolution. If streets
and underground utilities are installed by separate contractors, the warranty period
on streets shall commence after the final wear course has been installed and accepted
by City Council resolution and the warranty period on underground utilities shall
commence following their completion and acceptance by the City. All trees shall be
warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for twelve (12) months after
planting. Any replacements shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time
of planting. The Developer shall post maintenance bonds or other surety acceptable
to the City to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the
security posted by the Developer until the bonds or other acceptable surety are
furnished to the City or until the warranty period has been completed, whichever
first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. The City standard
specifications for utilities and street construction identify the procedures for
final acceptance of streets and utilities.
10. Gradina Plan. The plat shall be graded and drainage provided by the Developer
in accordance with Plan B. Notwithstanding any other provisions
of this Agreement, the Developer may start rough grading the lots within the
stockpile and easement areas in conformance with Plan B before the plat is filed if
all fees have been paid and the City has been furnished the required security.
Additional rough grading may be allowed upon obtaining written authorization from the
City Engineer.
4
If the developer needs to change grading affecting drainage after homeowners are on
site, he must notify all property owners/residents of this work prior to its
initiation.
11. Erosion Control and Fees. After the site is rough graded, but before any
utility construction is commenced or building permits
are issued, the erosion control plan. Plan B. shall be implemented by the Developer
and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion
control requirements if it is determined that the methods implemented are
insufficient to properly control erosion. All areas disturbed by the excavation and
backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work
in that area. All seeded areas shall be fertilized. mulched and disc anchored as
necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in
controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan
and schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take
such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to
notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do
so will not affect the Developer's and the City's rights or obligations hereunder.
If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any costs of the City incurred for
such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay
any costs. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued
unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements.
The Developer is responsible for a $ 350.00 Erosion and Sediment Control fee based
upon the number of lots in the plat, plus inspection fees at the current rate of
$39.00 per hour as charged by the Soil and Water Conservation District. The
Developer is also responsible for a Water Quality Management Fee of $ 1105.80 based
upon the number of acres in the plat.
12. Landscaping. The Developer shall landscape the plat in accordance with Plan C.
The landscaping shall be accomplished in accordance with a time
schedule approved by the City.
5
13. Phased Development. The plat shall be developed in one (1) phase in
accordance with Plan A. No earth moving, construction of
public improvements or other development shall be done in any phase until a final
plat for the phase has been filed in the County Recorder's office and the necessary
security has been furnished to the City. The City may refuse to approve final plats
of subsequent phases until public improvements for all prior phases have been
satisfactorily completed. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, this Development
Contract constitutes approval to develop the plat. Development of subsequent phases
may not proceed until development agreements for such phases are approved by the
City.
14. Effect of Subdivision Approval. For two (2) years from the date of this
Agreement, no amendments to the City's
Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service
area, or removing any part thereof which has not been final platted, or official
controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout
or dedications or platting required or permitted by the approved preliminary plat
unless required by State or Federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the
Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary,
to the full extent permitted by State law, the City may require compliance with any
amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan (including removing unplatted property
from the urban service area), official controls, platting or dedication requirements
enacted after the date of this Agreement any may require submission of a new plat.
15. Surface Water Management Area Fee. The Developer shall pay an area storm water
management charge of $ 236,006.77 in lieu of
the property paying a like assessment at a later date. The charge shall be assessed
against the lots (not outlots) in the plat over a 10 year period with interest on the
unpaid balance calculated at eight percent (8%) per annum. The assessment shall be
deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The assessments may
be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all procedural and
substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the assessments
exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise
available pursuant to MSA 429.081. Storm sewer charges for subsequent phases shall
~
.~t
6
be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at the time the Development
Contracts for those phases are entered into. Outlots A and B will be dedicated to
the City by the Developer for NURP ponds and flood plain associated with stormwater
management. The developer shall receive a credit or $120,750.00 for storm sewer
oversizing and NURP pond construction resulting in a net storm water management
charge or $115,256.77.
No building permits shall be issued for any lot within the plat until the City has
received the storm sewer charge per the schedule outlined in Appendix A.
16. Wetland Conservation and Mitigation. The Developer shall comply with the 1991
Wetlands Conservation Act, as amended, and
the Wetlands Mitigation Plan. The Developer shall pay all costs associated with
wetlands conservation and the Wetlands Mitigation Plan.
17. Water Main Trunk Area Charge. The Developer shall pay a water area charge
of $ 56,536.67 for the plat in lieu of the
property paying a like assessment at a later date. The charge shall be assessed
against the lots (not outlots) in the plat over a ten (10) year period with interest
on the unpaid balance calculated at eight percent (8%) per annum. The assessment
shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The
assessments may be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all
procedural and substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the
assessments exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to MSA 429.081. Water area charges for
subsequent phases shall be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at
the time the Development Contracts for those phases are entered into. The Developer
shall receive a credit or $25,336.54 for water main trunk oversizing resulting in a
net water main trunk area charge or $31,200.13.
No building permit shall be issued for any lot within the plat until the City has
received the water area charge per the schedule outlined in Appendix A.
7
18. Sanitary Trunk Sewer Area. The Developer shall pay a sanitary trunk sewer area
charge of $ 38,966.53 for the plat in lieu of the
property paying a like assessment at a later date. The charge shall be assessed
against the lots (not outlots) in the plat over a ten (10) year period with interest
on the unpaid balance calculated at eight percent (8%) per annum. The assessment
shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The
assessments may be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all
procedural and substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the
assessments exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to MSA 429.081. Sanitary Trunk Sewer charges for
subsequent phases shall be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at
the time the Development Contracts for those phases are entered into. The Developer
shall receive a credit of $ 6,712.00 for sanitary trunk sewer oversizing, resulting
in a net sanitary trunk sewer area charge of $32,254.53.
No building permits shall be issued for any lot within the plat until the City has
received the sanitary trunk sewer area charge per the schedule outlined in Appendix
A.
19. Park Dedication. The Developer shall pay a park dedication fee of
$ 14,060.00 in satisfaction of the City's park dedication
requirements for the plat. The park dedication fee shall be assessed against the
lots (not outlots) in the plat over a ten (10) year period with interest on the
unpaid balance calculated at eight percent (8%) per annum. The assessment shall be
deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The assessments may
be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all procedural and
substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the assessments
exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise
available pursuant to MSA 429.081. The park dedication fees for subsequent phases
shall be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at the time the
Development Contracts for those phases are entered into.
Outlot C will be dedicated to the City by the Developer for a City trail.
.~t
8
No building permits shall be issued for any lot within the plat until the City has
received the park dedication fee as outlined in Appendix A.
20. Sealcoatins. In lieu of assessing sealcoating three years from completion of
the road construction, the Developer agrees to pay a fee of $ N/A
for initial sealcoating of streets in the subdivision. This fee shall be deposited
in the City Road and Bridge Fund upon execution of this Agreement.
21. GIS Fees. The Developer is responsible for a Government Information System fee
of $ 125.00 based upon the number of lots within the subdivision.
22. Easements. The Developer shall furnish the City at the time of execution of
this Agreement with the easements designated on the plat.
23. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers
and contractors, a license to enter the plat to perform all necessary
work and/or inspections deemed appropriate by the City during the installation of
public improvements by the City. The license shall expire after the public
improvements installed pursuant to the Development Contract have been installed and
accepted by the City.
24. Clean Up. The Developer shall weekly, or more often if required by the City
Engineer, clear from the public streets and property any soil, earth
or debris resulting from construction work by the Developer or its agents or assigns.
All debris, including brush, vegetation, trees and demolition materials, shall be
disposed of off site. Burning of trees and structures shall be prohibited, except
for fire training only.
25. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, payment of
real estate taxes including interest and penalties, payment of
special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements in the plat and
construction of all public improvements in the plat, the Developer shall furnish the
City with a cash escrow, irrevocable letter of credit, or alternative security
acceptable to the City Administrator, from a bank (security) for $ 722,654.00. The
bank and form of the security shall be subject to the approval of the City
Administrator. The security shall be for a period ending October 31, 1997. The term
9
of the security may be extended from time to time if the extension is furnished to
the City Administrator at least forty-five (45) days prior to the stated expiration
date of the security. If the required public improvements are not completed, or
terms of the Agreement are not satisfied, at least thirty (30) days prior to the
expiration of a letter of credit, the City may draw down the letter of credit. The
City may draw down the security, without prior notice, for any violation of this
Agreement. The amount of the security was calculated as follows:
Grading/Erosion Control included below Monuments $ 3,000.00
Sanitary Sewer Lateral $ 58,726.00 St. Lites/Signs $ 7,500.00
Water Main $159,139.00 Blvd. Trees $ 15,000.00
Storm Sewer $174,950.00 Blvd. Sodding $ 22,000.00
Street Construction $219,881.00 Wetland Mitigation $ 5,000.00
Two Years Principal and Interest on Assessments $ 57,458.00
This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the
security.
26. Responsibility for Costs.
A. The Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction
with the development of the plat, including but not limited to, Soil and Water
Conservation District charges, legal, planning, administrative, construction costs,
engineering, easements and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval
and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Agreement, and all reasonable
costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the development
of the plat.
B. The Developer, except for City's willful misconduct, shall hold the City and
its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for
damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development.
The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs,
damages or expenses which the City may payor incur in consequence of such claims,
including attorney's fees.
.it
10
C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcemenc
of this Agreement, including engineering and attorney's fees.
D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City within
thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt
all plat development work until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within
thirty (3) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum.
27. Trash Enclosures. The Developer is responsible to require each builder to
provide on site trash enclosures to contain all construction
debris, thereby preventing it from being blown off site, except as otherwise approved
by the City Engineer.
28. Existing Tree Preservation. The Developer will walk the site with the City
Forester and identify all significant trees which
will be removed by on site grading. A dialogue between the Developer and City
Forester regarding alternative grading options will take place before any disputed
tree is removed. All trees, stumps, brush and other debris removed during clearing
and grubbing operations shall be disposed of off site.
29. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the
work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work
and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the
City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is
first given written notice of the work in default, not less than 72 hours in advance.
This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for
the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does
any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in
whole or in part.
11
30. Miscellaneous.
A. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors or
assigns, as the case may be.
B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for
denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties.
C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase
of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement.
D. Building permits shall not be issued prior to completion of rough site
grading, installation of erosion control devices and submittal of a surveyor's
certificate denoting all appropriate monuments have been installed. Only
construction of noncombustible materials shall be allowed until the water system is
operational. If permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of public
improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in
completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the
City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents or
third parties. Normal procedure requires that streets needed for access to approved
uses shall be paved with a bituminous surface before certificates of occupancy may be
issued. However, the City Engineer is authorized to waive this requirement when
weather related circumstances prevent completion of street projects before the end of
the construction season. The Developer is responsible for maintaining said streets
in a condition that will assure the access of emergency vehicles at all times when
such a waiver is granted.
E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or
amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers
shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the
City Council. The City'S failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this
Agreement shall not be a waiver or release.
F. The Developer represents to the City, to the best of its knowledge, that the
plat is not' of "metropolitan significance- and that an environmental impact stateme
r;
~r
12
is not required. However, if the City or another governmental entity or agency
determines that such a review is needed, that the Developer shall prepare it in
compliance with legal requirements so issued from said agency. The Developer shall
reimburse the City for all expenses, including staff time and attorney fees, that the
City incurs in assisting in the preparation of the review.
G. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. The Developer represents to the City
that the plat complies with all City, County, Metropolitan, State and Federal laws
and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning
ordinances and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does
not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow any construction or
development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's
demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance.
H. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title
to the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under
this Agreement, at the Developer's request the City will execute and deliver a
release to the Developer.
I. Developer shall take out and maintain until six months after the City has
accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance
covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may
arise out of the Developer'S work or the work of its subcontractors or by one
directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury or death
shall not be less than $500,000.00 for one person and $1,000,000.00 for each
occurrence; limits for property damage shall not be less than $200,000.00 for each
occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional named insured on said policy,
and Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City prior to the
City signing the plat.
J. The Developer shall obtain a Wetlands Compliance Certificate from the City.
K. upon breach of the terms of this Agreement, the City may, without notice to
the Developer, draw down the Developer's cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit
as provided in paragraph 25 of this Agreement. The City may draw down this security
in the amount of $500.00 per day that the Developer is in violation. The City, in
its sole discretion, shall determine whether the Developer is in violation of the
13
Agreement. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 29 hereof, this determination may
be made without notice to the Developer. It is stipulated that the violation of any
term will result in damages to the City in an amount which will be impractical and
extremely difficult to ascertain. It is agreed that the per day sum stipulated is a
reasonable amount to compensate the City for its damages.
31. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be
either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the
Developer by certified or registered mail at the following address:
Executive Director
Farmington Housing and Redevelopment Authority
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either and delivered to the City
Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail or registered mail in care of
the City Administrator at the following address:
John F. Erar
City Administrator
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
,;
.~:
14
..
SIGNATURE PAGE
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By: Eugene "Babe" Kuchera, Mayor
By: John F. Erar, City Administrator
DEVELOPER: Farmington Housing and Redevelopment Authority
By: Its
By: Its
LANDOWNER :
By:
Drafted by:
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, Minnesota
55024
(612) 463-7111
15
,
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of
19_____ by Eugene "Babe" Kuchera, Mayor, and by John F. Erar, City Administrator, of
the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the
corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by the City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
(ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of
19____ by Gerald A. Henricks, the Executive Director, and William Fitch, the Chair,
of the Farmington Housing and Redevelopment Authority, a corporation under the laws
of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
:-:
.::
16
-I
o
-I
)>
r-
eA
~~~N~
~WN-"-"
-" N(x)~
<0 OCoOl
<OCJ1CJ1~O'l
00000
ONOWN
(X)N<O<OO
(x)-"ONO'l
N(x)<O-"-..J
(x)N~<O~
-..J(x)<ON~
~~~~~
-"N-"~N
9_CJ195J1~
-"CJ1~N(x)
-..JO'l(X)ON
CJ1-..JNN(x)
. . . . .
-..J-"CJ1-..J0'l
WO'l~~O
~~~~~
-"
NO'lNNO'l
--..J(oeoN-~
CJ1NWWCJ1
~-"-..J0'l0
c.nOOlJ:,.J:,.
(X)O'lWWW
~~~~~
-"
N-..JWWO'l
'"c:o'W'O'Oeo
W-..JN~-..J
~O'l:l='-!'J~
<O-..J~-"-"
0'l(X)(X)CJ10'l
~~~~~
-"W-"CJ1N
N --" N <.n '"c:o
~-"-..J-"O
~~(X):l='-~
W <0 -..J N (X)
NOCJ1-"-"
~~~~~
-"~-"-..J~
-..IN-..JCJ10
--" '"c:o en (0 '0
O(x)N<OO'l
-..J W W CJ1 -"
. . . . .
CJ1<O~CJ10
<OOO~O
-i
o
-i
)>
,
,
o
-i
OJ
,
o
(")
^
N
N
CJ1
~
~)>
:::0:::0
mm
(J))>
-
~
o
~
(J)
-i
o
:::0
s:
(J)
m
~
m
:::0
-"
-"
_CJ1
N
CJ1
O'l
-..J
-..J
~
W
-"
N
o
o
~
~
m
:::0
-"
W
~
(J)
)>
Z
-i=i
:::0)>
c:::O
z-<
^(J)
m
~
m
:::0
W
W
N
CJ1
~
CJ1
W
~~
-" -"
~~
00
0'l0'l
00
00
00
iJ
)>
:::0
^
l-i
iO
iJ(J)~(J)-i
)>)>)>-1)>
:::OZ-iO'
^=im:::O,
"')>:::oS:S
r:R~~~)>
(J)m~:::O
m)>mm
~("):::O;:t>
mI(")
:::0)> I
-i:::O)>
:::00:::0
CmO
Z m
^
(")
I
)>
:::0
o
m
~~~~
-"
......1rr. ww....
_~ .!'J .-" 5J1
ONNN
O'l CJ1 0 CJ1
9~00'l
0CJ1-"-..J
OWW-..J
en
>
z
~
>
:;0
-<"
en>
~:;o
<3:
m-
..:::o~C
en-l~o
d~m,~
"'"- -<
.....ZOO
3:C"'tJ"
enc:~"
menen>
:e~>;;tJ
m_Q3:
;;tJ>;;tJZ
QOlmQ
:e~m-l
>-3:0
-l;;tJmz
m"::z
:;o"'tJ-l
>:t:
:;0>
men
>m
o-
J:
>
:;0
Q
m
en
)>
"'C
"'C
m
Z
C
-
><
)>
ESCROW AGREEMENT
This Agreement, made and entered into the ____ day of August, 1996, by and
between the Farmington Housing and Redevelopment Authority, hereinafter the
party of the first part, and the City of Farmington, hereinafter the party of
the second part.
WHEREAS, the party of the first part has platted the following described
property, to-wit:
That part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 25, Township
114, Range 20, lying north of the plat of Farmington Industrial Park,
according to the United States Government Survey thereof, and situated in
Dakota County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the party of the first part is constructing thereon Industrial Park
facilities which construction includes installation of sewer and water and
street utilities; and
WHEREAS, to insure that proper installation and inspection of said utilities
shall be accomplished in accordance with City code and City inspection
standards, the parties hereto agree that the sum of $722,654.00 is to be
placed in escrow and to be released and paid over as directed by the parties
of the second part.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows:
1. That the party of the first part hereby deposited with the First National
Bank of Farmington the sum of $722,654.00 to be held in a separate account
in escrow by the First National Bank of Farmington.
2. That the sum of $722,654.00 constitutes the total amount required to insure
the installation of the following stated utilities and monuments:
.,.t
Improvement
Estimated Amount
Utilities and Grading
Streets
Monuments/Street Lights/Blvd Trees/Sodding
Two Years Principal and Interest
$
392,815.00
219,881.00
52,500.00
57,458.00
3. That upon completion or partial completion of said improvements and the
same being inspected and accepted in writing by the party of the second
part, the First National Bank of Farmington shall release such funds to the
party of the second part or such other persons as are designated in writing
by party of the second part. Party of the second part shall have sole
authority to direct disposition of the escrowed funds to such persons as
those agreed upon by second party hereto.
SIGNATURE PAGE
City of Farmington
Farmington Housing and Redevelopment
Authority
By:
Mayor
By:
HRA Chairperson
And:
City Administrator
And:
HRA Executive Director
The First National, Bank of Farmington acknowledges receipt of the sum of
$722,654.00 pursuant to the terms of the above stated escrow agreement and
hereby agrees to hold and deliver said funds pursuant to the terms above
stated.
Dated:
The First National Bank of Farmington
By:
And:
In the presence of:
Witness
Witness
.~f
/
5k
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City
Administrator ~
FROM: Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Metropolitan Council Environmental
Services Inflow/Infiltration Grant
DATE: August 13, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The City of Farmington applied for a $10,000 grant from the Metropolitan Council Environmental
Services for inflow/infiltration reductions in the sanitary sewer system.
DISCUSSION
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services established a grant and loan program which
would provide up to $400,000 to communities in the metropolitan area to reduce inflow/infiltration
of clean water into the municipal sanitary sewer systems. The City of Farmington has been very
aggressive in it's inflow/infiltration reduction programs.
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services reviewed the application for these grants and
loans. It was determined that Farmington would not receive the $10,000 grant as outlined in the
attached letter. The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services offered funds to nine
communities. Farmington ranked #12 out of 16 applicants. These rankings were based on a
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services study on wet weather flows.
ACTION REQUESTED
This memo is for information only, no council action is required.
:rt::,IY S7JL1
Thomas :Lunslri. P.E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
TlK/ll
cc: file, Wayne Henneke, Jerry Bauer, Donajo Heikes, TJK
CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street · FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fall' (612) 463.2591
~ Metropolitan Council
~ Working for the Region, Planning for the Future
July 22, 1996
Environmental Services
.,.. ~.:;;.
fi m@(guw!(g~
.259J)
, I ~
j
-
Mr. Thomas J. Kaldunski
Director of Public Works
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Re:MCES Matching Grant for Infiltration/Inflow Control Studies
Dear Mr. Kaldunski:
I regret to inform you that your application for a matching grant did not result in a grant offer.
The Metropolitan Council authorized grant offers to nine community projects during their July
11, 1996 meeting. A table of applicants and grant offers is enclosed. The ninth offer to Arden
Hills does not represent the full amount of their grant request. Therefore, after all costs
associated with the proposed projects have been verified by the Council, the amount of Arden
Hills grant will be adjusted accordingly. The nine grants in addition to the nine loans being
offered, fully encumber the $400,000 funding allocated to this program.
The Council is currently evaluating the implications of the costs associated with offering future
grants and loans for community infiltrationfmflow assistance. The Council will notify you of
any new program if it develops.
The Council appreciates your interest and efforts to reduce infiltration and inflow in the
Metropolitan Disposal System. We encourage you to continue your systematic program of
wastewater collection system monitoring, inspection and rehabilitation.
If you have any questions regarding the Council's infiltration/inflow program, you may telephone
Kyle Colvin at 229-2151.
Sincere,:, MA
fJv~ I 0 'h-
William G. Moore
General Manager, Wastewater Services Dept.
WGM:KLC:cal
A:\F ARM.DOC
Enclosure
cc: Jean Erickson, Director of Management Services Dept.
230 East Fifth Street St. Paul. Minnesota 55101.1633 (612) 222-8423 Fa." 229.2183 TDD/TlY 229-3760
An !:qual OpportunUy E'"f'Io1Ier
~ en "TI en ~ ~ C:E >S:03: 0 "TI en ~ 3:
t; ", ::0 ~ ::1 :!: ::O,,::Oz rn 0 :r: rn
i ::0 6 ", ::0 ornoz z ::0 0 ", 0
Z r )> r 3: r-f rn-fZrn -f rn ::0 r Z
!. ~Q ~ Q ~ z rnrn ~~OO-f rn enrnrn >
rn Q OtD :;0 -f:E'"
-", ~~ =-:E ~ <
1 eo> -f S"Fz en r= S:0S: 0
J; ~~ 0 0 >::0 -en-f ~ r @o- 0
0 Z ~-f rn OZ 3
i -~ ~ 0 ~
,.-, ~ "'I :E 3
i!. ~ z c
. r: z a. en :::J
~ en Ul :r: ~
:r: ~ :g en
=ij :r:
~ a =ij
a "C
0
- ~
f':l
?- ?-
.... :;0
C:i~~~~~~ ~I ~ ~QQQ
.... ................................. ,2>
CD 000000 !"o~'O~:'"'O'O'O'O c 3
CnNOOOOOO WONOU!O)OOOO (D 0
.........000000 CD ooocooooo (II C
NC11000000 ....0000.....0000 -:::J
enooooooo enooooCnoooo (D-
00000000 o 00000000 a.
....
......... ............
~~~ ~~~
0,0,:"'-.)"(000
C1100 cooo
000 Co)oo
000 (000
000 NOO
.....o)o)o)C11~cO)
Co)CO(l)U!.....C11Co)
.... . ~ .... .... .... ....
....i...................................
.... 0)0.....--.0000
c..co;."oo,o,OOOO
.... ooocooooo
en(l)Ooo.....oooo
o 00000000
0000000000
....
....I........~ ....~~....
en ....N....~NNNN
:> 0 !:-J .0 Y' .Co) .0 .0 .0 .0
....o~ooCo)oooo
CDOOOOCOOooo
cnoooOU!oooo
oooooboooo
o 00000000
~~~::jC:;~o.Co)
>
3
o
C
:::J
-
co
~
:::J
-
(D
c.
8
3
'C
CD
-
(D
en
~
o
o
o
o
o
'C
a
cp
C'
C
a.
co
(D
-
d
r-
~
C
C.
'<
8
(II
-
0)
~
C
3
(D
po
:::J
P'
:::J
o
-
'C
a
<
0:
(l)
c.
s-
O)
~
G>>
~ 3
:::J 0
_C
(D :::J
0.-
(}
oS'
o(f)
!/l-
C
a.
'<
.
:E....
(Dco
_co
:EN
(DO
11):1:
-N
is:
-':1:
"'0=
(D-
11):;0
7':'11)
:;O:::J
1I)2r.
:=:::J
occ
en
z
o
-
(D
en
:z,
;.
U> ~
f':l =
?-=
~f':l
e.~
'< ..
N _
N \0
.. \0
tOo..
\0
0\
c:'l
n~
OZ
~~
d~
zS::
~~
SS
ooZ
~~
t:1z
~~
c:'l
00
5/
TO:
Mayor and Councilmembers,
City Administrato~~
Karen Finstuen,
Administrative Assistant
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Adopt Resolution Accepting
Donation of Coffee Maker
DATE:
August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Adopt a resolution accepting the donation of a coffee maker.
DISCUSSION
Chris Galler has generously donated a coffee maker to the City. It has been
placed in the Main Conference Room in City Hall and is being used frequently for
meetings.
A letter of appreciation will be sent to Mr. Galler for his thoughtful gesture.
ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt a resolution accepting the donation of the coffee maker.
J(WJ- an. ~
Karen Finstuen
Administrative Assistant
CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street · FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fall' (612) 463.2591
PRO P 0 SED
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING DONATION OF COFFEE MAKER TO CITY
~
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City
on the 19Th day of August, 1996 at 7:00 P.M..
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following:
WHEREAS, Chris Galler has generously donated a coffee maker to the City; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept such donation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby accepts the
donation of a coffee maker from Chris Galler.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open
session on the 19th day of August, 1996.
Mayor
Attested to the _____ day of August, 1996.
City Administrator
SEAL
5fY\
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Recommendation for Employment
Assistant Liquor Operations Manager
DATE: August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The recruitment and hiring process has been completed for the position of Assistant Liquor
Operations Manager.
DISCUSSION
A review of the candidates for this position has been completed by staff with the recommended
selection of Ms. Lisa Shadick for this position.
BUDGET IMP ACT
This position was budgeted for in the 1996 Budget and adequate funds exist for this purpose.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the hiring of Ms. Shadick for the position of Assistant Liquor Operations Manager
effective September 9, 1996.
Respectfully submitted,
Ib
hn F. Erar
City Administrator
I
CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street · FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7171 · Fall' (612) 463.2591
5(\
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers,
FROM:
John Erar, City Administrator
SUBJECT:
Approve School/Conference
Request - Windows NT
DATE:
August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Request approval for City Administrator to attend a LOGIS course on Windows
NT, the program which operates the City's computer network.
DISCUSSION
It is vital for a member of staff to be proficient in the program which
operates the City's computer network. This course is designed to provide the
necessary skills to operate Windows NT and, as a member of staff with previous
experience in this type of program, it would be most beneficial for the City
to allow the Administrator to attend.
BUDGET IMPACT
There is adequate funding in the 1996 Budget's Schools and Conferences line
item to fund this course.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve the attached school and conference request for the City Administrator
to attend the Windows NT Course at LOGIS on August 19 through August 23, 1996.
Respectfully submitted,
:et~
City Administrator
CitlJ. of FarminlJ.ton 325 Oak Street · FarmintJtonJ MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fall' (612) 463.2591
, - .
_ __ L
REQUEST FORM
SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/TRAINING
DEPARTMENT__~~~n~2~~g~iQnDATE OF CONFERENCE__a~ii_/_a~~~__
From To
LOCATION LOGIS
---------------------------------------------------
EMPLOYEE(S) ATTENDING: 1)
2)
John Erar
3)
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
TYPE OF CONFERENCE Windows NT
TOPICS 1)__~2~_!Q_B~~~gg=N!n~Q~~=NI=~iN====================
2)
3)
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
METHOD OF TRAVEL________f~f________________________________
AMount Provided in Adjusted
19_22 Budget $__~11~QQ___
Amount Request $__~~Q~QQ___
Amt Remaining $__3B3_DD___
__d~__-- _.!lLcth~-
Dep;tt~;~t Head Dat~
1) Travel $
2) Reg i st r~ati;;;:;-$==[~I~crc[=
3) ROOM $_________________
4) Meals $________________
5) Other Expense $________
~LL':I.b_'
Date
-----------------------------------------------------------
TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL
I RECOMMEND THE ABOVE REQUEST BE APPROVED.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Date
ACTION TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL
ON THE ______ DAY OF __________________, 19
(APPROVED)
Rev 9/86
(NOT APPROVED)
--
VENDOR APPROVAL SUMMARY REPORT 50 Date: 08/14/96
COUNCIL MEETING OF 8/19/98 Ti 118 : 3: 10011
City of FarIDin9ton Pa~: 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vendor
Vendor NlIIIl8 Number Descrioticn Chec;k AIlount Hand Check A8Iount
------------------------~---~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
" REPAIRS EXPLORER - ENG 285.21 .00
AIRLAKE FORD-MERCURY 1330
ALBINSON 1018 MARKING PAINT - ENGINEERING 41.48 .00
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC INC 1030 POST - STREETS 142.98 .DO
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 1032 CHIPPER RENTAL - SHADE TREE 213.00 .00
ASPENWELL TREE SERVICE 4303 INSTALL LIGHTS - POOL 215.88 .00
ASTLEFORD INTERNATIONAL INC 1036 PARTS-STREETS 83.80 .00
B & 8 PIZZA 4252 MEETING - GEN REC 8.52 .00
BLAHA'S TOWING 2970 TOWING - STREETS 31. 95 .00
BLUE RIBBON CLEANING 4288 CARPET CLEANING - GEN GVT 330.19 .00
BRAUER. FRED 4308 SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEN REC 48.00 .00
BT OFFICE PRODUCTS INTL 4114 OFFICE SUPPLIES - GEN GVT 218.07 .00
BUDGET MART 1098 GAS-ADM,FIRE.PK,ST.POL.ENG.SW 3.242.58 .00
BURNSVILLE SANITARY CO. 4312 RUBBISH SERVICE - SW 8.409.10 .00
8USINESS RECORDS CORP. 2014 ELECTION BOOTH EQUIPMENT-GN GV 3.359.82 .00
CARLSON TRACTOR . EQUIP 1130 MATERIALS - STREETS 180.70 .00
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 2873 ANTIFREEZE - STREETS 10.00 .00
CARTRIDGE CARE 4227 PRINTER CARTRIDGES - GEN GVT 122.48 .00
COP IMAGING SYSTEMS 3077 COPIER LEASE - GEH GVT 287.89 .00
CHAMPION SPORTS 2749 CLOTHING - POLICE 327.83 .00
CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIP IHC 1146 800TS - FIRE 72.50 .00
COAST TO COAST-A 1185 MATERIALS - FIRE 21.78 .00
COMP-U-LINK sves 2307 COMPUTER LINK - GEN SVC 48.00 .00
CONOCO INC. 3148 GAS-FIRE.POL.ADM.PK.SW 2.012.35 .00
CRYSTEEL DIST. INC. 2727 MATERIALS - STREETS 242.43 .00
DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO. 1185 MATERIALS - STREETS 89.47 .00
DAKOTA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH 4311 VACCINATIONS - POOL 440.00 .00
DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER 1194 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS RECEIPT 17.08 .00
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 1177 STREET PAINT - STREETS 114.81 .00
DOYLE INC. 1183 PARTS - STREETS 215.08 .00
DUEBER'S VARIETY 1191 SUPPLIES - GEN REC 26.13 .00
ECONOMY HANDICRAFTS 4302 SUPPLIES - GEN REC 87.82 .00
ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC 2180 ALARM SYSTEM - LIQUOR 1.105.47 .00
FABRA-PRIHT. INC. 1232 DECALS - SOLID WASTE 715.58 .00
FARMINGTON BAKERY 1219 GOODS-GEN GVT. ENG 128.74 .00
FARMINGTON INDEPENDENT 2190 PUBLIC HEARING - GEN GOVT 11.13 .00
FARMINGTON PRINTING 1228 SUPPLIES - GEN GOVT,SR CTR.SW 1,100.07 .00
FEED-RITE CONTROLS INC. 1237 CHLORINE - POOL 829.82 .00
FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE AGENC 1828 HEALTH SPEC RISK ACCIDENT INS. 350.00 .00
FIRSTAFF 1798 RECEPTIONIST - GEN GOVT 528.00 .00
FRANCIS KOVICH. JOE 4305 SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEN REC 192.00 .00
GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN 2011 OFFICE SUPPLIES - GEH GOVT 114.78 .00
GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS-FURN 3067 REMODELING/FURNITURE 2.912.76 .00
GERLACH. PAUL 4301 SOCCER INSTRUCTOR - GEM REC 250.00 .00
GERSTER JEWELERS 1288 DAVE DAHL PLAQUE - STREETS 22.70 .00
GIVENS. KYLE 4310 SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEM REC 320.00 .00
GODFREY'S CUSTOM SIGNS 1293 SIGNS FOR CITY HALL - GEN GVT 110.83 .00
GOLD STAR PRINTING INC 1294 ICR FORMS - POLICE 288.25 .00
GOPHER SIGN CO. 1291 SIGNS - STREETS 44.98 .00
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL. INC. 2728 ONE CALL SERVICE - SEWER 234.50 .00
GRANNIS' GRANNIS. P.A. 1309 LEGAL BILLINGS 4.915.00 .00
GRAY BAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 1318 LAMP - POOL 109.14 .00
HAMMER. ED 4288 SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEN REC 172.50 .00
HANSON. KEN 4288 SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEM REC 128.00 .00
HARBEE'S GALLERY 1321 CUT FRAME - GEN GOVT 40.75 .00
JIM HATCH SALES CO INC 1328 HD BATTERY - STREETS 57.51 .00
City of Fan.ington
Vendor Name
Vendor
Humber
VENDOR APPROVAL SUMMARY REPORT
COUNCIL MEETING OF 8/19/98
Descriotion
Check AIlount
Data: 08/14/98
Ti_: 3: 10PII
Page: 2
---- ------------------ --,~.~---..,.------------~----------------------------------------------------.-----------------
, >
Hand Check AIIouI
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST .19
INNOVATION GROUPS
INSTANT TESTING CO
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL.
INTOXIMETERS INC
JACKSON LANDSCAPE SUPPLY.
KOCH ASPHALT CO
KORBA. JERRY
KWIK TRIP INC.
LA ROCHE'S PORT TOILET RENT
LAKEVILLE TROPHY CO.
LAMPERTS
JOY LILLEJORD
LOCATOR & MONITOR SALES
LOGIS
LOSHBOUQH. JEVAN
MAC QUEEN EQUIP IHC
MASERUS. JACK
Me NAMARA CONTRACTING CO IN
MEHARDS
MINN RECREATION a PARK ASSO
MODEL STONE CO.
MORE 4
MOTOR PARTS SERVICE
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NORBY. ERICK
NORDIC TRUCK PARTS. INC.
NORTHSTAR REPRO PRODUCTS.
PEDERSEN AUTO SHOP INC
PEER ENVIRONMENTAL a ENGINEER
PEKEL. DAN
PELLICCI HARDWARE
ROO EQUIPMENT CO.
REPLACEMENT PARTS INC.
ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION
TOM RYAN CONSTRUCTION
S & S ARTS & CRAFTS
SAVOIE SUPPLY co
SCHMIDTKE FUELS INC
SCHULTZ, JEROME
SEMPLE BUILDING MOVERS
SERVICE ONE COMPANIES. INC.
SIGN SOLUTIONS
SKB
ST ANEK. BRIANA
STARR AUTOMOTIVE
STERLING CODIFIERS INC
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
TOOLS UNLIMITED WHOLESALE
TRANS-ALARM, INC.
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES
VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPAN
WELCOME FRIENDS
WENDLAND DISTRIBUTING INC
ZACK'S INC.
"
1370
2793
1372
INC 1379
2506
INC. 1390
1418
4270
4294
1448
1431
1442
1805
1436
3108
4307
1484
4308
1472
1535
2028
2684
1202
1520
2697
4309
3105
INC. 2309
1804
2986
4285
3062
4215
3079
2985
2861
4298
1696
1700
4304
2983
1701
4298
1709
4297
1733
1728
1762
1906
2716
1800
1819
1958
1828
1853
FERTILIZER.VIDEO REHT-PK.FIRE
CUSTOMER SERVICE PKT - GEN GVT
SOIL TEST - WAUSAU
FILTER - SOLID WASTE
ALCOHOL TESTING - POLICE
MATERIALS - PARKS
MATERIALS - STREETS
SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEN REC
GAS - STREETS
RENTALS - PARKS
PLAQUES-SOFTBALL LEAGUE-GEN RC
MATERIALS - STREETS
REIMBURSE SUPPLIES - GEN REC
MATERIALS - STREETS
LOGIS SERVICE
SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEN REC
MATERIALS - SOLID WASTE
SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEN REC
MATERIAL FROM PLANT - STREET
MATERIALS - PARKS
POSTER - GEM REC
ROCK. SAND - STREETS
SUPPLIES-GEH REC.GEN GVT. FIRE
PARTS - POL. ENG. ST
PARTS - POL,POOL.ST
SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEN REC
PARTS - STREETS
MATERIALS - ENG
REPAIRS TO SWEEPER - STREETS
ENGINEERING SERVICE - WAUSAU
SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEN REC
MATERIALS-GV.PK.POOL,SR,POL.FI
EQUIPMENT - STREETS
PARTS - SOLID WASTE
DELIVERY - GEN GVT
REPAIRS CITIZEN GARAGE - SW
CRAFT SUPPLIES - GEN REC
MATERIALS - GEN GOVT
OIL - STREETS
SOFTBALL UMPIRE - GEN REC
SIGNS CITY HALL - GEN OOVT
DUMPING FEES - SOLID WASTE
REIMBURSE POOL UNIFORM
PARTS - ADM
SUPPLEMENT '144- OEN GOVT
CYLINDER RENTAL - STREETS
MATERIALS - SW
MONTHLY LEASE - POOL
UNIFORM RENTALS-SW. STREETS
SUPPLIES - FIRE
PLANT FOR STELZEL - GEN GVT
PARTS - SOLID WASTE
PARTS - STREETS
420.87
50.00
204.82
180.26
95.80
7.49
2119.44
128.00
288.58
1,818.07
149.10
15.111
211.114
90.75
2.839.03
2911.00
1,275.18
192.00
428.50
153.05
49.00
436.00
115.98
47.80
822.23
144.00
173.89
357.20
131.31
852.41
192.00
1,337.11
389.17
199.70
30.30
200.00
87.51
1,049.93
288.27
128.00
.00
.00
315.42
147.00
17.88
485.09
111.00
5.27
43.00
97.30
398.88
27.48
40.95
128.07
51.12
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.Ou
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
it
City of Farmington
VENDOR APPROVAL SUMMARY REPORT
COUNCIL MEETING OF 8/19/96
Date: 08/14/96
Tin: 3: 10paa
Page: a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vendor Name
Vendor
NUllber
Descriotion
Check Amount
Hand Check Amount
ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.00
r 1859
GUTTER BROOM - STREETS
Grand Total:
91.32
50,820.78
.00
Council Meeting of 8/19/96
Bills previously paid but ~ot approved:
A T & T Wireless
ABH Properties
Alcorn Beverage Co. Inc.
American Association Retired Persons
Budget Oil
City of Farmington
CMI
Coca Cola
College City Beverage Inc.
College City Beverage Inc.
Computer Cheque of Mn
Dakota Electric Association
Daniel Glick
Farmington HRA
Farmington Independent
First National Bank
Fritz Co. Inc.
Fritz Co. Inc.
Frontier Communications
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Griggs Cooper & Co.
James Heim
John Erar
Johnson Brothers St. Paul
Jordan Beverage Inc.
League of Mn Cities Insurance Trust
Mark Anderson
Metropolitan Council
MN Dept. of Natural Resources
MN State Treasurer
Northern States Power Co.
Paul & Mary Walsh
Phillips Wine & Spirits
Quality Wine & Spirits
Quality Wine & Spirits
Vic Wenzel
utilities
building rental
merchandise for resale
"55 Alive" Course
Pilot Knob liquor rent/expo
Municipal services
postage for utility billing mailing
merchandise for resale
merchandise for resale
merchandise for resale
service
utilities
closing bill refund
building rental
help wanted ad
balance of landscaping escrow
merchandise for resale
merchandise for resale
utilities
merchandise for resale
merchandise for resale
merchandise for resale
Firefighter Recertification
August car allowance
merchandise for resale
merchandise for resale
Claim
closing bill refund
Service availability charge
water permit application fee
Building permit surcharge
utilities
building rental
merchandise for resale
merchandise for resale
merchandise for resale
closing bill refund
Approved:
Kuchera
Galler
Fitch
Gamer
Ristow
Page 1
.
26.62
1,890.00
16,902.80
88.00
2,023.59
392.50
368.45
369.05
300.00
9,796.80
79.88
1,154.89
5.31
80.00
54.00
1,000.00
842.31
387.46
352.15
29.79
1,715.59
7,239.94
10.00
200.00
4,770.51
2,610.05
100.00
19.37
40,095.00
500.00
7,200.79
4,621.47
180.00
4,071.43
455.65
458.80
704.13
111,096.33
6Q
TO:
Mayor and Councilmembers
City AdministratorJ~
FROM:
Charles Tooker, City Planner
SUBJECT:
zoning Ordinance Amendment
Relating to Maximum Size of
Garages and Height of Sheds
DATE:
August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The proposed ordinance eliminates the requirement of a conditional use permit for
garages between 800 and 1000 square feet and increases the maximum height of storage
sheds. The ordinance does not address the construction of accessory buildings on
lots without a principal use.
DISCUSSION
Both staff and the Planning Commission agree the height of accessory storage
buildings should be increased from nine feet (9') to twelve feet (12') based upon
standard sizes for building materials.
Although the Planning Commission disagrees, staff recommends elimination of the
conditional use requirement for garages between 800 and 1000 square feet. The
proposed ordinance would allow garages of 1000 square feet or the square footage of
the principal use, whichever is less, as a permitted use.
Accessory storage buildings are defined as follows in the City Code: Any building or
use customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal building or use and
located on the same lot as the principal building or use. This definition infers
that a basic zoning premise is involved. None of the cities polled on this issue
allow accessory uses without a principal structure; and neither the Planning
Commission nor staff recommend a change in the ordinance. A major concern is that
freestanding garages represent an investment which could become a problem if they
were to become business uses in residential neighborhoods.
REQUESTED ACTION
Adopt the attached ordinance, which has been reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney, amending the City Zoning Ordinance relating to maximum size of garages and
height of sheds.
{liRespecU;;'1l2::.:d.
~'es Tooker
City Planner
I ct1
- CifJJ of FarminfJton
.ri
325 Oak Street. FarminijtonJ MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7111 · FaK (612) ~63.2591
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE
An Ordinance Amending Title 10, Chapter 3, Section 2 and Title 10, Chapter 6,
Section 5 of the City Code
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA, HEREBY ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: Title 10, Chapter 3, Section 2 of the
Farmington City Code is hereby amended by
adding (underlined) and deleting (struck) as follows:
Permitted Use
Conditional Use
(C) R-1 Low
Density District
16. ~ccessory 8tructures
BOO to 1000 square feet
(D) R-2 Medium
Density District
18. Accessory 8tructurca
800 to 1000 square feet
(F) R-4 Mixed Code
District
9. Acceooory Ctructureo of
800 to 1000 oquare feet
SECTION II: Title 10, Chapter 4, Section l(L) of the
Farmington City Code is hereby amended by
adding (underlined) and deleting (struck) as follows:
L) In the R-1, R-2 and R-4 Residential Districts, the total area utilized by
detached private garages shall not exceed ei~at hunarea (800) one thousand
(1000) square feet or the s~are footage of the principal use. whichever is
smaller. lImiTe'Jcr, aetached private !Jara!Jcs of \If'l to ORe taousaRa (1000)
s~are foot may BC appro7cd tarou~h tho cORditioRal uoc proceoa. All garages
must comply with maximum percentage of lot coverage listed in Table 1,
Section 10-4-2.
SECTION III: Title 10, Chapter 6, Section SA.2 of the
Farmington City Code is hereby amended by
adding (underlined) and deleting (atruck) as follows:
S. A. Residential
2. They shall not exceed RiRe feet (9') twelve feet (12') in height and one
hundred twenty (120) square feet in area.
SECTION IV: After adoption, signing and attestation, this
ordinance shall be published one time in the
official newspaper of the City and shall be in effect on and after the day
following such publication.
.
,....-.
/
......... "~-
TO:
.\Iavor. Cuuncilmembers ana City
Ad~inistrator --Y~~' .
'-.'
"
FROM: Thomas J. Kaldunski. P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Project 96-5. Phases II & IV of the
HRA Industrial Park
DATE: August 19. 1996
INTRODUCTION
The City received bids for the above referenced project. The Council will be considering awarding
the contracr.
DISCUSSION
On August 8, 1996, the City received six bids for Phases II & IV of the Industrial Park. The low
bid was submitted by Arcon Construction. I have reviewed these bids with Jerry Henricks. HRA
Director. Mr. Henricks has indicated that the City can proceed on Phase II only at this time. This
decision is related to land acquisition. A copy of the bid tabulation is attached. The following
outlines the bids received:
1) Arcon Construction
2) Nonhdale Construction
3) Brown & Cris, Inc.
4) Richard Knutson, Inc.
5) S.M. Hentges
6) Ryan Contracting
Engineer's estimate with 10% contingency
Total Bid
51.050,991.34
51.133,610.83
$1,183,365.65
51.201,319.25
51.289,112.20
51,238.868.84
51.374,848.00
The low bid submitted by Arcon Construction includes the following:
Phase Il only
5483,287.4 7
5516,189.91
5527,671.48
5559.162.77
5557.217.45
5583.139.41
Base Bid
AIr. #1
AIr. #2
Alr. #3
AIr. #4
All. ;;:5
Phase II of the Industrial Park
Phase IV of the Industrial Park
Watermain loop west of CSAH 31
Sanitary Sewer to east of Eaton A venue
Seal Coating - Phase II
Seal Coating - Phase IV
Total Project Bid
5483.287.47
5466.480.29
577.672.22
56.375.36
58,588.00
58.588.00
51,050,991.34
L
CitIJ. 'of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street · FarminijtonJ MN 55024 · (612) ~63.7711 · FaK (612) 463.2591
.
The City should proceed with the base bid which will result in the construction of Phase II of the
Industrial Park.
Alternate #1 - Phase IV of the Industrial Park, will not proceed at this time due to land acquisition
negotiations. The City received favorable bids for this phase.
Alternate #2 - Watermain Loop west of new CSAH 31, will be delayed until development occurs
west of the new CSAH 31.
Alternate #3 - Sanitary sewer to the East on 208th, will not be installed at this time. The
undeveloped property east of Phase II of the Industrial Park can be serviced by the proposed trunk
sanitary sewer which will also serve the Murphy, Genstar and Wenzel properties after MUS A
expansion is approved by the Metropolitan Council.
Alternate #4 - Seal Coating Phase II, will not be awarded at this time. The City will follow its
policy of assessing the cost based on this bid for the first seal coat which is scheduled three years
after street construction.
Alternate #5 - Seal Coating Phase IV, will not be awarded at this time.
BUDGET IMPACT
Jerry Henricks has completed a fiscal review for this project. His review indicates that the HRA
has funding for Phase II construction as outlined in this memo.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Council accept the bids received and approve the resolution awarding the base bid - Phase
II construction to Arcon Construction in the amount of the low base bid of $483,287.47.
It is also recommended that the Council authorize the preparation of an assessment roll for Phase II
of the Industrial Park which includes the base bid of $483,287.47 plus seal coating costs of
$8,588.00 resulting in a total construction assessment of $491,875.00.
R/ectfully Subm~tted,
fJ .. ,;"I::uJ
Thomas J ~dunski, P .E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
IJK/ll
cc: file, Wayne Henneke, Jerry Henricks, Donajo Heikes, Rosemary Swedin, IJK
68
.
Proposed RESOLUTION NO. R -96
ACCEPT BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT TO ARCON CONSTRUCTION
FOR PROJECT 96-5, PHASES II & IV OF THE BRA INDUSTRIAL PARK
Pursuantto due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council ofthe City of Farmington,
Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 19th day of August. 1996 at 7:00 P.M..
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
Member
introduced and Member seconded the following resolution:
WHEREAS, pursuantto properly published notice, the following bids were received, opened and tabulated,
which complied with the advertisement. The following represents the three lowest total bids submitted:
Contractor
1) Arcon Construction
2) Northdale Construction
3) Brown & Cris, Inc.
Total Bid
$1,050,990.34
$1,131,500.83
$1,183365.65
Phase II only
$483,287.47
$516,189.91
$527,671.48
;and
WHEREAS, the City and HRA have determined that construction on Phase II of the Industrial Park should
proceed based upon Arcon Construction's low base bid of$483,287.4 7, ;and
WHEREAS, the City and HRA have determined that Phase IV and the watermain loop should be delayed at
this time, ;and
WHEREAS, it appears that Arcon Construction is the lowest responsible bidder;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the bids received.
2. The City Council hereby awards the total base bid to Arcon Construction in the amount ofit's
low base bid of$483,286.47 for Phase II construction only.
3. The City Council hereby rejects Alternate bids #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5.
4. The Mayor and Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to sign the appropriate
contracts.
5. The City Council hereby establishes the amountto be assessed at $491,875.00, which
includes the Phase II construction and initial seal coating.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote ofthe Farmington City Council in open session on the 19th day of
August, 1996.
Mayor
Attested to the
day of
,1996.
Clerk! Administrator
SEAL
To:
\layor ana City Clml1cil
City A.dmmistrator (/ry){../
From: G~rald A. Henricks
HRA Executive Director
Subject: Industrial Park 2nd Addition
Date: August 19, 1996
Introduction
The bids for the construction of the infrastmcture for the Industrial Park 2nd Addition has
been received by the City Council. Mr. Tom Truszinski. representative ofJuran and
yloody Financial Advisor for the City, will be present to explain the Bond issue for the
infrastructure of the industrial park.
Discussion
The size of the bond issue will be $850,000. This size of a bond will provide the
City/HRA sufficient funds to purchase the land and complete the infrastructure
construction. The life of the bond will be 15 years with the property owners being
assessed for the improvement.
Financial Impact
The assessment role will be determined upon completion of the infrastructure
construction. A possible method of assessing the costs associated with the infrastructure
improvement costs would be to base the assessment upon the available useable land in
the Industrial Park instead of by linear foot frontage. This method would recognize the
actual land area that receives benefit from the improvements. This method would call for
the property owners to be assessed as follows: 22.54 acres of useable land. estimated
assessable amount $701.468(Director' s memo dated August 10.1996)
Year U seable Land Principal and Interest Assessment! Jcre
1998 22.54 acres Sl12.733.33 55.001.48
1999 22.54 acres 100.320.00 -1..450.75
2000 22.54 acres 96.773.33 -+.293.40
2001 22.54 acres 93.226.67 -+.136.05
2002 22.54 acres 89.680.00 3.978.70
2003 22.54 acres 86.133.33 3.821.35
2004 22.54 acres 82.586.67 3.664.00
2005 22.54 acres 79.040.00 3.506.65
2006 22.54 acres 75.493.33 3.349.30
2007. 22.54 acres 7'1.946.67 3.191.96
.:;
'"',
---..
!
\i.,...
"
i
!
'--
""',
- CitlJ of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street · FarminijtonJ MN 5502~. (612) 463.7111 · FaK (612) ~63.2591
2008 22.54 acres 68,400.00 3.034.61
2009 22.54 acres 64,853.33 2.877.26
2010 22.54 acres 61,306.67 2.719.91
2011 22.54 acres 57,760.00 2,562.56
2012 22.54 acres 54,213.33 2.405.21
The actual assessment per acre/lot will be determined in November following completion
of the construction. Lexington Standard has agreed to pay the assessments for its 5 acre
site. In 1998, Lexington Standard Corporation's assessment could be $25,007.40.
Financial impact for the HRA beginning in 1998, should no other land be sold but the
land to Lexington Standard Corporation, could be as follows;
1998 17.54 acres X $5,001.48 = $87,725.96
1999 17.54 acres X $4,450.75 = $78,066.16
2000 17.54 acres X $4,293.40 = $75.306.24
2001 17.54 acres X $4,136.05 = $72,546.32
2002 17.54 acres X $3,978.70 = $69,786.40
2003 17.54 acres X $3,821.35 = $67,026.48
2004 17.54 acres X $3,664.00 = $64,266.56
2005 17.54 acres X $3,506.65 = $61,506.64
2006 17.54 acres X $3,349.30 = $58,746.72
2007 17.54 acres X $3,191.96 = $55,986.98
2008 17.54 acres X $3,034.61 = $53,227.06
2009 17.54 acres X $2,877.26 = $50,467.14
2010 17.54 acres X $2,719.91 = $47,707.22
2011 17.54 acres X $2,562.56 = $44,947.30
2012 17.54 acres X $2,405.21 = $42,187.38
Action Request
Mr. Truszinski will be at the meeting to present the bond issue. The City Council will be
requested to authorize the presentation of the bond for bids. It is suggested that the City
Council approves this request contingent upon the HRA review and approval of the bond
proposal at its August 19, 1996( following the City Council meeting).
Respectfully su~~itted, . ~ ""
~~At€ ~~
Gerald A. Henricks
HRA Executive Director
cc: Department Heads
foe
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and
City Administrator~
I
FROM: Daniel M. Siebenaler, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Award Towing Contract
DATE: August 19, 1996
Introduction
Pursuant to City Council authorization the City Towing Contract was
put out for bid.
Discussion
The City Towing Contract was published for bid. As a result, two
bids for the service were received. The bid being recommended by
staff will result in substantial savings to both the citizens of
Farmington and the City itself in nearly every category of the
contract.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council award the towing contract to
Dakota County Towing.
Respectfully submitted,
~
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
DMS/m
Attach: Dakota County Towing
Blaha Towing
cc: Dakota County Towing
Blaha Towing
I
Citl}. of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street · FarminijtonJ MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7111 · FaK (612) ~63.2591
Blaha's Towing
SCHEDULE A
PROPOSED RATES
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
CITY DESIGNATED CONTRACTOR
TOWING, HAULING MOVING, VEHICLES
TOWING/HAULING
TOWING HAULING DOLLY WINCH
per
Base Loaded Mile
$2.00per mile
2.
3.
Vehicles less than 1 ton, $ 45.00 Over 25.00 15.00
includes cars, motor- S
cycles, trucks, flatbed- 50.00 Miles
scooters, 3-wheelers,
snowmobiles, boats, boat
trailers, mini-homes
police Vehicles 15.00
Special Events/
Construction and/or as 40.00 /hr minimum
needed by police Dept. 40.00
1.
SPECIAL CHARGES
1. Service Call
20.00
2. Pull drive shaft or dis-
connect transmission (RWD)
25.00
3. Unlocking Vehicle
N/A
4. Tire Change
25.00
S. Release at Scene
20.00 or active cancel to be
charged to owner
6. Snow Shoveling (Snowbird-
Ditch work)
15.00 per 1/4 hr/
7. Car Starting
35.00
8. Disconnect Linkage
25.00
9. Storage Fee (Per day)
20.00 inside $12.00 outside
EQUI PMENT : 1 . 80 Ford 1 ton wrecker with dual axle
2. 84 Ford 1 ton Flat bed with dual axle
STORAGE:
At 201 Spruce Street
ri
DAKOTA COUNTY TOWING
SCHEDULE A
PROPOSED RATES
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
CITY DESIGNATED CONTRACTOR
TOWING/HAULING
TOWING, HAULING MOVING, VEHICLES
TOWING HAULING DOLLY WINCH
per
Base Loaded Mile
$1.50 per mile
1. Vehicles less than 1 ton,
includes cars, motor-
cycles, trucks,
scooters, 3-wheelers,
snowmobiles, boats, boat
trailers, mini-homes
2. police Vehicles
3. special Events/
Construction and/or as
needed by police Dept.
$ 2'5.00
Over
'5
Miles
1').00
').00 per
1/4 hr.
12.00
28.00 /hr minimum
28.00
SPECIAL CHARGES
1. Service Call 20.00
2. Pull drive shaft or dis-
connect transmission (RWD) 5.00
3 . Unlocking Vehicle 20.00
4 . Tire Change 20.00
5. Release at Scene 20.00
6 . Snow Shoveling (Snowbird-
Ditch work) 5.00 per 1/4 hr.
7. Car Starting 20.00
8. Disconnect Linkage 5.00
9. Storage Fee (Per day) 7.00
EQUIPMENT: 1- 1 ton dually with wheel lift/ sling
2. 2 ton dually with wheel lift
3. 2 ton dually with wheel lift/sling
4. 1 ton flatbed with dual axle
STORAGE:
2 acre outsdie lot, also inside storage available
at $9.00 per day. Both located at 17690 Clayton Ave., Coates, MN
1ez
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City
Administrator
FROM: Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E.~
Director of Public works/city Engineer
SUBJECT: Disposition of Contaminated Soils -
Wausau Storm Sewer Alignment
DATE: August 19, 1996
Attached you will find copies of correspondence from Clean Soils, Incorporated. This firm was
hired by ARCON Construction to do the soil remediation of the material with the above referenced
project. These cotnaminated soils have been successfully treated.
1%:/;~,
Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
TJK/ll
cc: file
Glenn Cook
Donajo Heikes
TJK
I
Citlj. of FarminfJton 3250akStreet.FarminijtonlMN5502~. (612) ~63.7111.FaK (612) ~63.2591
ClffanSoils
./ '-
SOIL REMEDIATION CONTRACTORS
CleanSoiis Minnesota inco'
.3500 Labore Rosa Suire 1
/adnais Heights. MN 55110
612) 483-4500
,,612) 483-4800 fax
.
August 6, 1996
Mr. Dale Mans
ARCON ~nstruction Company Inc.
903 :East Forest Avenue, P.O. Box 57
Mora. MN 55051
Dear Mr. Mans:
RE: Fmal Repon on soil Treatment and Notification of Post-Bum Sampling Results
Site: Wausau Supply Company Inc., 21130 Chippendale Avenue, Fa..TIDington, MN
MPCA Leak ID#:
ClesnSoils Project.#: MN1996
OeanSoils has successfully completed the thermal treatment of petroleum contaminated soil from
the above rcf==ced site. The uealed soil meets all MPCA requirements. ..utached please find a
copy of independent post-bum analyses for BTEX, GRO and/or DRO. Below is other information
regarding the treated soil.
Quantity of Soil: 55.32 tons
Completion Date: July 15, 1996
Post-Bum Samples: MNl996-1
Final Disposition of Soil: Qualified Fill Project
If you should have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (612) 4834500.
Sincerely,
~-
Daniel P. Rose
Manager, OeanSoils Minnesota Inc.
aa.achmcnts
cc:
File
Jessica Ebertz, MPCA
Consultant
@
.:i
I
I
j
D
To:
Mayor and City Co~l
City Administrator'1OV
i
From:
Gerald A. Henricks
HRA Executive Director
Subject: Exchange Bank Building
Date: August 19,1996
Renovation of the Exchange Bank Building exterior using Community Development
Block Grant funds.
Discussion
Attached for the Council's review is a letter from Lee Smith pertaining to the
understanding for the renovation of the exterior of the Exchange Bank Building.
On July 31,1996, Lee Smith and Kari Gill, Dakota County HRA representatives, Ruth
and Larry Lawrence, developers of the Exchange Restaurant, Michael Mularoni,
architect, and I met to discuss the various methods of completing this project. The
method of completing this process called for the plans and specifications be prepared and
presented to Charles Nelson, Minnesota Historical Society architect, as soon as possible.
Also, it was determined that the project should be divided into two elements for bidding
purposes. Element # 1 would be the renovation of the exterior of the buildings. Funding
for this element would be the CDBG funds. Since CDBG funds are to be used, it is
necessary to obtain competitive bids thereby meeting the requirements of the Davis-
Bacon laws. The second element is the interior of the building. This element will not
require competitive bidding due to the fact that no CDBG funds are being used on this
element of the project. With private dollars funding the second element of the project,
competitive bidding is not necessary.
To move the project forward, Dakota County HRA representatives agreed to use CDBG
funds for architectural work associated with the renovation of the exterior of the project
under the following conditions;
1. The City Council agrees by resolution that the historic preservation and restoration
of the exterior of the building be completed even if the Lawrence's project should
fail to continue.
By peIforming the exterior preservation and restoration work, the City has met the
requirements of the CDBG guidelines. The City would no lon~er be obligated to
return any of the CDBG funds to HUn. The exterior of the bmlding would be
restored providing an upgraded appearance to the building thereby allowing the
.::
L
CitlJ.' of FarminfJton
325 Oak Street. Farminijton1 MN 5502~ · (612) 463.7111 · FaK (612) ~63.2591
opportunity to sell the building to a prospective client.
2. That the historic preservation and restoration work will be completed no later than
June 1,1997. This would require that the restoration work would begin this fall.
3. That if the City does not complete or meet the conditions as stated above, the City
would repay the full amount of the CDBG funds used to acquire the Exchange Bank
and the Larson Building.
4. That there will be no further time extensions for the use of the CDBG funds.
This method of allowing the CDBG funds to be used for the restoration of the exterior of
the building would accomplish several activities.
1. Eliminate the repayment of the CDBG funds.
2. Restore the appearance of one of the main buildings in the downtown area.
Financial Impact
If the City proceeds with the above scenario, the City would eliminate the potential
financial obligation of repaying the CDBG an estimated $210,000.
Action Requested
The City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution authorizing the use of
CDBG funds for the preservation and restoration of the exterior of the Exchange Bank
Building. This resolution would allow the architect to receive a prorated amount for the
work to be performed for preparation of the plans and specification for the presentation of
the plans to Minnesota Historical Society for approval.
Respectfully Sub~1ed, . ~ l
~JA-.t€ Jf.~
Gerald A. Henricks
HRA Executive Director
:;
DAKOTA. COUNTY
H - R l' \:
uusm~ ~ edc'\'cl\'!'lllenr ."\llLl1\l[\n'
--~~ ~-"';',",..,-\_~
~ -rd(~-l.+.:;t1: ....r
_ .~~ :;,,", 1 ,< . ;-.:-\.\ ('
August 2, 1996
Gerald A. Henricks
HRA Executive Director
City of Farmington
325 Oak St.
Farmington, MN 55024
RE: Exchange Bank Building
Dear Mr. Henricks:
As we discussed in our meeting of July 31st, the Dakota County HRA
is willing to expend Community Development Block Grant funds for up
to one-third of the architect's fees for preparing plans and
specifications for renovation of the Exchange Bank Building
suitable to meet the Minnesota Historical Society and U. S.
Department of Interior requirements for historic preservation, if
the following conditions are met:
The Farmington City Council shall pass a formal resolution stating:
-That the historic preservation and restoration work to
be funded through the CDBG Program will be carried out by
the Farmington HRA regardless of whether or not the
current redevelopment proposal by the Lawrences is
approved to proceed.
-That the historic preservation and restoration work will
be completed no later than June 1, 1997. (This assumes
that the activity will start this fall.)
-That, failing to meet the conditions above, the City
shall repay the full amount of CDBG funds invested in
acquisition, relocation, and architectural plans
pertaining to the Exchange Bank and Larson Buildings
(Larson Building expenditures could be excepted from this
requirement if that building is demolished) .
-That it is understood and agreed that there will be no
further extension of time for utilization of the CDBG
funds and for meeting the original CDBG project
objective.
We will cooperate with the City and with the Lawrences to keep the
current project proposal moving forward to the best of our ability.
"AN EQUAL OPPORTU~ITY E\lPLOYER"
page 2
However, we wish it to be expressly understood that we will not
support plans to meet the CDBG objective by demolition of the
Exchange Bank Building.
If you have questions or comments concerning this matter during the
next week, please call Kari Gill at 423-8111. I will be back in
the office on August 12th, so you can contact me after that date.
Sincerely,
if~
Lee Smith
Community Development Supervisor
.~t
s~
TO:
Mayor, councilmemb~r~_
Ci ty Administrator y -
FROM:
Wayne Henneke, Finance Director
SUBJECT:
1995 Audit Presentation
DATE:
August 19, 1996
Bill Lauer, representing the City's auditing firm of Malloy, Karnowski,
Montague and Radosevich, will present the City's 1995 Financial Audit during
Monday evening's meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
w~~
Wayne Henneke
Finance Director
CitlJ. of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street · Farminijton1 MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7111 · FaK (612) ~63.2591
FROM:
DO
//
Mayor and Councilmembefs,
City Administrator~
Mary Hanson
Clerk Typist
TO:
SUBJECT:
Southeast Area-Resident Survey
DATE:
August 19, 1996
Councilmember Galler informed staff that he had not received any additional
questions or suggestions for revisions to the survey presented at the last
meeting.
Council is requested to direct staff whether or not it wishes to proceed with
preparing and mailing the survey, and to also identify the area to be covered by
the mailing.
Respectfully submitted,
I
City of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street · Farminijton1 MN 55024 · (612) ~63.7111 · faK (612) 463.2591
~(~
'J
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers,
City Administrator;Y'rf,
_ YI/v
I
FROM: Karen Finstuen.
Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Results of City Wide Survey
DATE: August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
A City Wide Survey was sent to residents on May 24, 1996. A total of 2,725 surveys were sent,
with 475 responses received or a 17% total response rate from the sample surveys.
DISCUSSION,
Attached, please fmd copies of the survey showing separate responses from the North and south
portions of the City per council request. On several survey questions, there were two responses
to a particular question suggesting that more than one individual had completed the survey.
The fIrst survey question, Other than by voting, do you feel you have a say about the way the
City operates?.. the response was 489 of which 93 said yes (19.6%), 314 said no (66%), and 82
said don't know (17%).
The second question, How much do you feel you know about the work of the Mayor and
Council? 483 people responded, of which 10 said a great deal (2%), 144 said a fair amount
(30%),280 replied very little (58.9%) and 49 said don't know (10%).
The third survey question, Please rate the job you feel the Mayor and Council are doing, and
provide one or two reasons for your rating. The response was 320 of which 20 strongly approve
(4%), 178 somewhat approve (37.4%), 84 somewhat disapprove (17.6%), 38 strongly disapprove
(8%). The reasons for the rating varied from approval to disapproval of renovating the Exchange
Bank Building and support to non-support of municipal garbage pickup.
The fourth item What are your 3 primary sources of information about the City's government
and activities? (Rank in order of importance) is as follows:
1 Farmington Independent
., Thisweek Newspaper
3 City Newsletter
4 Other Residents
5 Life and Times Newspaper
_ Citll of Farmin'lton 325 Oak Street. Farminijton1 MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7111 · Fait (612) ~63.2591
.
6 Mailings
7 Dakota County Tribune
8 Other Newspapers, Mayor and Council. and City Staff (all tied
with 10 responses each).
The tifth survey question Does your household currently subscribe or have access to Cable
Television? 473 responses were received, 314 said Yes (66%) and 159 said No (33%).
The sixth question If you answered yes, would you watch City Council meetings if they were
televised? 349 responded, 92 very likely (19.3%), 133 somewhat likely (28%), 86 not too likely
(18%) and 38 not at all (8%).
The eighth survey question Are you in favor of changing the City's billing system from a
quarterly to a monthly basis, with the understanding that this would probably increase costs?
There was a total of 451 responses, 17 of which said yes, regardless of increase (3.6%), 55 said
yes, but no more than $1.50/quarter increase (11.5%), 69 said yes, but no increase in billing
(14.5%) and 310 said No (65%).
The responses to the questions of improving communications, suggestions of projects to be
undertaken and city services which should be reduced or eliminated are available for your review
at your convenience.
REQUIRED ACTION
No action required. This is for your information only.
Respectfully submitted,
~CLu- ~
Karen Finstuen
Administrative Assistant
:r
1996 CITY OF FARMINGTON
OPINION SURVEY
196 Responses South Farmington
~ order co better understand our residents' percept~~ns of =~e City, the C~ty Council is
~equesting that you complete the following survey and return it with your utility bill.
~ll responses will be kept confidential. The results Nill be published in the Farmington
:~dependent and the City Newsletter.
. Other than by voting, do you feel you have a say about the way the City operates?
49 Yes
129 No
23
Don't Know
. How much do you feel you know about the work of the Mayor and Council?
6 A Great Deal
84 Fair Amount
~very Litc:e
~Don't Know
. Please rate the job you feel the Mayor and Council are doing, and provide one or two
reasons for your rating.
J:.!..Strongly Approve 88 Somewhat Approve
37 Somewhat Disapprove 1~Strongly Disapprove
. What are your 3 primary sources of information about the City's government and
activities? (Rank in order of importance)
No Ranking Those Who Ranked No Ranking Those Who Ranked
1 2 3 1 2 3
~Farmington Independent 65 10 4 ~City Newsletter ~ l3 l1
~Dakota County Tribune 1 2 2 ..lL. Mailings 4 5 2U
5UThisweek Newspaper 9 28 13 ~Other Residents 6 10 12
30 Life and Times Newspaper 7 12 -lLMayor and Council 4 1
~Other Newspapers ~City Staff 1 3 1
Other
. Does your household currently subscribe or have access to cable television?
~Yes, subscribe to cable.
~NO, either do not subscribe or do not have access
. If you answered yes, would you watch City Council meetings if they were televised?
36 Very Likely
S3 Somewhat Likely
l7 Not too L~~ely
1~Not at all
.r;
. Do you have any suggestions for improving communication between the City's Council and
staff and residents?
. Are you in favor of changing the City's billing system from a quarterly to a monthly
basis, with the understanding that this would probably increase costs?
~Yes, regardless of increase
11-Yes, out no more than $1.50/quarter increase
~Yes, out no increase in billing
152 No
. Please list 3 projects which you feel are important for the City to undertake in the
near future.
. Please list 3 City services which you feel could either be reduced or eliminated.
Thank you for completing this survey! We appreciate your time and interest.
1996 CITY OF FARMINGTON
OPINION SURVEY
279 Responses from North Fa~ington
_~ order to better understand our residents' Dercept~cns c= =~e ~~=y, =~e ~~=j' ~c~nc~_ --
:::equesting that you complete the following survey and reCL::~ ~ = ;.;~ ch yo~r -..:=~i~ =y b~ll.
.::"11 :::esponses will be kept confidential. The resul ts ;.;i':"':" ~e ::;:..;b':"~s:;ed -.. =.':2 ?arm~ng=cn
~ndependent and the City Newsletter.
. Other than by voting, do you feel you have a say about the way the City operates?
44 Yes
185
No
59
Don't Know
. How much do you feel you know about the work of the Mayor and Council?
4 .'\ Great Deal
60 Fair Amount
~very Litt:e
43 :Jon' t ,,:no'...,
. Please rate the job you feel the Mayor and Council are doing, and provide one or two
reasons for your rating.
~Strongly Approve 90 Somewhat Approve 47 Somewhat 9isapprove 24 Strc:".gly Disapprove
. What are your 3 primary sources of information about the
activities? (Rank in order of importance)
~o Ranking Those Who Ranked
1 2 3
03 5 0
1 1 3
15 32 9
14 15 7
5 3 4
City'S government and
1
14
1
1
Ranked
3
21
23
n
2
1
~Farmington Independent
11 Dakota County Tribune
~Thisweek Newspaper
45 Life and Times Newspaper
~Other Newspapers
02 City Newsletter
52 Mailings
~Other Residents
~Mayor and Council
---5-Cicy Staff
Those
1
15
~
Who
2
29
12
No Ranking
2
Jther
. Does your household currently subscribe or have access to cable television?
203 Yes. subscribe to cable,
~NOI either do net subscr~be or io not have access
. If you answered yes, would you watch City Council meetings if they were televised?
,~_~___:er: Likely
80 Somewhat Likely
59 Not coo L~~e~y
22 :';C~ a-:
. ~o you have any suggestions for improving communicacion becween the City's council and
staff and residents?
. Are you in favor of changing the City's billing system from a quarterly to a monthly
basis, with the understanding that this would probably increase costs?
~Yes, regardless of increase
~Yes, Due ~o more than $1.50/quarter increase
54 Yes. DUe no increase in billing
158 No
. Please list 3 projects which you feel are importanc for the City to undertake in the
near future.
. Please list 3 City services which you feel could either be reduced or eliminated.
::"hani< you for completing this survey! We appreciate :.-our r:ime and interest.
,;
.
,
TO:
'3d( l)
Mayor and Councilmembers
City Administrator?!~
FROM:
Charles Tooker
City Planner
SUBJECT:
Update on Recycling/Redemption
Center Zoning
DATE:
August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Staff secured copies of zoning ordinances from communities that address recycling
and forwarded a sample to the Planning Commission prior to their August 13th
meeting.
DISCUSSION
Planning Commission discussion focused attention on the most appropriate zoning
district for recycling activity. Five ordinances from communities of similar size
were reviewed and items that may be suitable for Farmington were noted. The
Commission has decided to explore recycling as a conditional use within the
industrial district based upon the experience of the communities polled.
The Planning Commission will review a draft ordinance on September lOth and a
recommendation will be presented to City Council on September 16th.
ACTION REQUIRED
No action is necessary at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
&~ if! ft~
Charles Tooker
City Planner
ct7
I
CitlJ of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street · Farminijton1 MN 5502~ · (612) 463.7111 · FaK (612) 463.2591
~/ .~!
'^'L\
, ,
\ J \
'-/
FROM:
\.lavor. Councilmembers and Citv
Ad~inistrator v~ .
/
Thomas J. Kaldunski. P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
......
TO:
le
SUBJECT:
Recycling Activity
DATE:
August 19. 1996
INTRODUCTION
Recycling has been discussed at recent Council meetings due to a proposal to establish an
aluminum can recycling business. This memo outlines various aspects of the City's Solid Waste
Code. Chapter 7.
DISCUSSION
The City Code. Chapter 7, defines the City regulations relating to solid waste collection, including
the collection of recyclables. The code defines recyclable materials as "all items of refuse
designated by the Director of Public Works." Attached is a copy of the Curbside Recycling Basics
section of the Farmington Waste Disposal Guide which identifies all designated recyclables covered
by the City code. Please note that plastic milk jugs for reuse are not listed as recyclables in this
guide. Reuse of containers is a separate process that is not regulated by code. but it is encouraged.
City code, Section 7-1-2, specifically states that all refuse shall be collected, conveyed and
disposed of by the City. This code prohibits any person from collecting refuse in the City.
Recycling, by definition, is refuse.
There are provisions in the code that would allow an exception to this section of the code. Section
7-1-2 (E) specifically allows an exception for recyclable materials to be handled by a private hauler
"upon recommendation of the Public Works Director". The Director's recommendation is
typically a list of conditions that must be met. These conditions are reviewed and approved by the
Council.
The code does require a permit for some waste handling operations. In addition. Section 7-1-4
requires a contract between the City and any private hauler operating within Section 7-1-2 (E)
-Exception for Recyclables". The terms of this agreement must be approved by the City Council.
Dakota County also has rules and regulations that will affect the proposed aluminum can recycling
center. The County will require the operator to be a licensed refuse hauler. If the City changes
the land use criteria. as outlined in the memo from Charlie Tooker. and allows recycling in the
.::
- Cit1J of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street · Farminijton1 MN 55024 · (612) ~63.7111 · FaK (612) ~63.2591
industrial zoned areas, the County will be involved in establishing some of the criteria for this
"transfer station". The County has indicated that they have specific regulations that would apply.
In addition, the City will have to identify conditions for the permit. Issues that will need to be
considered include; noise, trash collection, vermin, odors, traffic patterns, aesthetics, neighbors,
MPCA regulations, etc.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council will need to consider the land use issues first. The zoning is the most important
factor in establishing where this type of activity (aluminum can recycling center) could occur.
If the Council considers the land use changes as discussed by the Planning Commission, the
Council will have to provide direction to staff on the processing of the necessary permits, licenses,
exemptions and agreements before the operation can open its doors.
Respectfully Submitted,
ff:iL~
Director of Public W orIes/City Engineer
TJK/ll
cc: file
Development Committee
Curbside Recycling Basics
MAGAZINE9 AND CATAlOG9
. shiny magazines
. shiny catalogs
. keep separate from newspaper
CORRUGATED CARDBOARD
. needs to be broken down into 2' x 2'bundles
. keep separate from other materials
NO-
waxy or glossy cardboard
pizza boxes
cereal boxes
12 pack boxes
STEEL AND ALUMINUM CANS
. no need to remove labels.
. rinse
~
GLASS BOnlE9 AND JARS
. food and beverage bottles and jars
. clear, green, brown
. rinse
. remove caps, lids and rings
. no need to remove labels
NO-
drinking glasses
ceramics
window glass
glass cookware
NEWSPAPER
. include advertisements that
come with the newspaper
PLASTIC BOnlES WITH A NECK
. pop, milk, ketchup, cooking oil, detergent, bottles, etc.
. rinse and flatten
. throwaway caps and pumps
NO-
plastic tubs
ice cream pails
plastic bags
flower pots
JUNK MAIl/UNSOLICITED MAil
. all first class mail
. all white and light colored paper (includes envelopes
with labels &. windows)
. recycled paper
. computer paper.
NO-
brown/gold envelopes
product samples
metal bindings
construction paper
DID "iOU KNO .
f-:ach reCided aluminum can
\. s3'iles Ihe equ~nt of one cup of
(' gasoline and mes enough energi
to bum a 100--.)all light bulb for
J.5 hours or run a 1"\7 for_
Ihree hours.
:;
G
~~
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City
Administrato~
FROM: Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Project 93-14, Phase 2 of the Prairie
Waterway - Proposed enhancements to
dry NURP ponds
DATE: August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
I have received a proposal to enhance the wetlands and NURP ponds on the Prairie Waterway -
Phase II project from the City's consulting engineer, Glenn Cook at Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik
& Associates. Staff has reviewed this proposal.
DISCUSSION
Phase II of the Prairie Waterway Project is currently under construction. This phase of the project
will complete the waterway from Spruce Street to S.T.H. 50. The plan prepared by B.R.A.,
utilizing the Balmori study, dated November 14, 1994, is being followed.
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates reviewed the project. They are recommending that
the City consider authorizing approximately 24,200 cubic yards of additional excavations enhance
the wetlands and NURP ponds, as outlined in the attached memo. A map identifying the wetlands
and NURP ponds is attached.
A. NURP Ponds - Pond #1
The proposed changes would revise the NURP pond #1 from "dry" to "wet" under normal
conditions. Currently, the pond is designed to have a dry bottom most of the time. The NURP
Pond #1 would become wet following a storm event. Pond #1 would return to its designed dry
bottom eventually.
It is proposed to excavate Pond #1 approximately six feet deeper which would create a permanent
pool of water.
Many regulatory agencies have reviewed the original design of this NURP pond, which meets all
requirements for storm water treatment. The proposed revision (to allow for a permanent pool of
water) would enhance the treatment capacity of water soluble pollutants. This would improve the
treatment efficiency and exceed the requirements of the agencies that reviewed the original design.
I
CitlJ of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street. Farminijton1 MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7111 · FaJf (612) ~63-2591
The City will need to determine if this proposed increase in treatment efficiency is more valuable
than the expense of enhancing this NURP pond.
Pond #7
The proposed changes to Pond #7 basically reshape the existing plan at no additional cost to the
City.
B. Wetland Areas
The existing wetlands are shown on the attached map (numbers 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6). The original
designs for these wetland areas have been reviewed by many regulatory agencies. The original
design meets all requirements of those regulatory agencies.
It is proposed to lower the bottoms of those wetland areas by excavating two to four feet of
additional material from the bottom as outlined in the letter from Glenn Cook, B.R.A.A.. This
would enhance these wetland areas by providing wetter soil conditions to promote a larger variety
of wetland plant species on the bottom and by providing open water areas within the wetlands to
promote more wildlife use.
The City will need to determine if the wetland enhancements provide more value to the aesthetics
of the wetland areas. The City has the option to construct Phase II of the Prairie Waterway per the
approved plans and consider constructing the enhancements at a later date. This would result in a
higher project cost when compared to constructing the enhancements at this time.
The Council could consider a change order to construct these enhancements with the current
project.
BUDGET IMPACT
The proposed enhancements to the wetlands and NURP ponds will increase the cost on the project.
Wayne Henneke, Finance Director, has reviewed the project budget presented to the Council on
4/29/96. This budget included contingency funds estimated to be at $20,000.00. There have been
no changes to the project which have spent any of these contingency funds to date.
The estimated construction cost of these enhancements, at this time, is as follows:
Excavation
Salvage of respread topsoil
24,200 cy
3,000 cy
at $1.00/cy
at $1.20/cy
$24,200.00
$3,600.00
$27,800.00
x 1.25
$34,750.00
Additional funding
legal, engineering, administration & contingency
There are not enough contingency funds to cover the proposed enhancements.
would have to be provided if all the enhancements were approved.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Council reject the proposal for enhancements to the wetlands and NURP ponds at this
time due to budgeting constraints and the fact that the existing NURP pond design meets all
applicable standards in accordance with the Balmori study.
Respectfully Submitted,
ff:L~~
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
TJK/ll
cc: file
Wayne Henneke
Charlie Tooker
Donajo Heikes
Rich Schindler
TJK
Glenn Cook, B.R.A.A.
/~
----
a Bonestroo
. 1 Rosene
. ~ Ande. rlik &
'\J' Ass9Ciates
EngIneers & Architects
AUlust J 2. 1996
'.'
;I.~"'U<N. Il'l",~k ,1/,~ 'J' ...J ",...~.,.....1. ~.., I) JlI A"",,,,,,,~,, 140..", Eq..><i 'J,.opw''-y .".....,..v
i'I"' 'PellJ. UUII G HU''''\I'',r. ...( . JU"'p'll'" "'nUn".. Pt . M4tVtfl L ~'A"""". t.E .
IC,II.~.I J I'.'M'I,I'L . (,;"'.,~' I ,......, /'/ . """noli [ NuyC'$, ~.. . 11"'....'1 (, ~."'ll1Khl. P.t .
J..." .\ 11",,,,_... ~~ . ICn""" It I/u.."". 1'1, ,lOol~., loA fe-II", C "Au \<.n1uI lO,...........,
Jlu......", "'"...,,,,,, 111.......1" 1...,rr~<J 1'[" hili'... c.arGut~ I't . 1I1)/)fo1ll' "'1:11",,,.. f'S .
1(1< ~a It' fOUlN, 1" ,(.."..10, I """I... I'e, . -..rr C IIIIU",. AI.A . MM. A H..I...",,., .
"""'~...., 1 R............/'I . I..IIIJ",.." rr . lrl1ll1f1tl1' """"r'UlL jOC.. M... II llul'L rt,.
\00..,.1' 1otI....l\>Ill'I. /'S, I ~. 1fuUt1. I, .'''''''111
IJI'",,, 1/ ,...., .0<.....,,0:., W1HlIIoCI..>oJ ~I Clnud. MN. to4.Lo~ ""
~..i~
~.. ..l....ift~. ~
~~~.r-
Mr. Tom Kalcfunski
City of Fanninaton
325 Oak Street
F~ngton,~ 55~J3S8
Re: VenniJlion River Tributary
Our File No. 14162
Dear Tom:
We have reviewed the gradins plan for the Venn.iJJion River Tributary and would m:ommcnd that
the wctJand areas be lowered about two feet. We would also recommend that the NURP pond IOUtb
of SPIUCC Street be conslnlctcd as I Wet pond.
The chanp are proposed after rcviewlna the status of the wetland areu developed as a part of the
Phue I construction. The pond water elevations are affected by tho Jl'ldient of the channel CO a
greater degree than oriainaJly anticipated. The poncb, therefore, do noc rtt&in as much Wlter II
desired in the original de.ign concept.
The attached sheelS &bow the proposed chanJel. The (ollowing is a summary of the i~
excavation quantities for the project.
5,000 cu. yds.
1.400 cu. )Ida.
5,000 cu. yda.
3JOO cu.)'Iis.
5,500 CL yda~ c..~
3,800 cu. yd.. '()o
- -v'-\'
18, J-v
We would aJso propolC a change in the Configuration of Pond 7 (NURP) CO scpente the channel
flow from the Nt1RP pond. This chanac would not rcsuJt in any cbanp in thct excavation qumddea.
We have ta1kod with Mr. Charlie Tooker about moving tho obicrvation area to tho cut. lbil would
not telUltln any quantity change.
Eo.od
-r'fS41~ -1
'--i
3
4
5
6
7
Iy;c
DeaJp Pond
Bottom EJevarinn
Commnn Ry~.
Proposed Pond
Bottom EJevadoQ
NURP
n
m
IWIV
IWIV
mnv
NURP
890
890
890
890
890
890
884
884
888
886
886
886
886
884
:;
J~~C; \r/t'H Hln"w;tu ~~ . c:. D~.., .... .._u_ _ _ .
Mr. Tom KaldwukJ
August 12, J996
Page 2 ~ .,
Please review and let me know If you are in qrcement with these propoMCI chIRp. The quctjtiea
shown could be used for preparation of the chanp order.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDBRUK " ASSOCIATES, INC.
d/l-t.f,.L
Glenn R. Cook
ORC:)a
Attachments
i.
j i
I
I. '
':. ~
,
j,
,"I
\.:
, ,
.~.
\' I'
,:
\: "
I
..' '
'. "
N01DNlrl~Vj";jO'.UO' ...
dlHSNMOl 3~ldrl3
6L-010
.'.:" .~.,,::.':::::~. ~
I
\
\
'- ~
o g- is
IN
(f)
w
~
~ Z J I
. ."- .... ~.. ..... ...... ." ii. I
..~., w.' ....... "
<( !:J '
~ <(
a.. 0=: !
(f) 0 Ii
CJ" lL. ~ ; I , " .
-;-. --: -::,--::-:::. - -.:-m:: :::=:::r~:_',
.-...... II; I;
, I It
I fl.
I '
j t Z -15 I;
i I I ;
!11 0 I::
ill; I,!
. ..,'..---" :'~ ~,:: ::', .:' '., .,,.. ~.. .:: .',,'~ ~~ :::.,., ,l~ r.:, ~. :: ::: :'" .:' '-.':~'~~
1 . ! II I i
1<; 110 I r' I'
; r I: I
I ' ,
i Ii I
O tt 'I
i I: 1:-'
ti ill: ~ " !' "-
I Ii .J' "- "-
0::: i j'r------- I;' ,
-1',:,': ::_-~ > -, 5' ::: :::~ ::; l' ;- ::":: -, .:.: >; :
. : <( , i ' I I
: : J:I: ; i : : :
I 9-1S Ii: I I ,I I
I : : : ! i 'I '
~ 0 I! ; I; . I I
1 . . .
_ _;_ _ _ _ _ _ L'':...> _ .......... - -'- - ~)_:!_\.._ - - - -- -_-:_::::.~- - - _.I.:
-~'r. - - - -:::: ~ - -:-:: :-...,... .... .,..,..., !- - ~,:: = -:, -:~. --:. -- .._~, I
,.... ...., ,...,'" '-;; , I . I I
il r ,1: i:
II : II I I
! ; I I
:1 : I i I I
::..l L... ',.:. ......:~l _.. ...,' - ..' :.::. \ :~. r _ ~ I
" ' ; 'I? i (
, : .
'I "-,,. i : ~ -~
:,1 ; i '-__
:\ : I :'
i
, ....
,
dJ
IW
j:I:
I(/)
'w
!w
:(/)
~
J:lIIIIH .r u,nsor
I!
I
,
I '
'31!flVS .:rr
r~l'O 0
Br-Z ~o
v-IS 0
~S-8
---: ~..~~.......,n;war --
'1S H1r ~ Z
IX)
"-~~O
w
W
:I:
(/)
i W
,I W
-- (/)
: ------.;;;;
--,
---- --- -- --
--
NtNnlJOV :>JII:> l\' VIlNt'1
o <(
Z 0
)
ci 1
rY- ~
--
--
---
tJ
a-oto
<;7-010
1\\
8-f
FROM:
Mayor, Councilmemb~~~ and
City Administrator9~-
I
Daniel M. Siebenaler, Chief of
policeq
.I
TO:
SUBJECT: Cat Ordinance
DATE: August 19, 1996
Introduction
Pursuant to City Council direction, staff has investigated the
possibilities of adopting a cat ordinance into City Code.
Discussion
As a result of round table discussions at the July 15, 1996,
Council meeting, staff obtained copies of fifteen animal control
ordinances pertaining to cats.
These ordinances follow two formats. In thirteen of the fifteen
samples obtained, the cat ordinance is the same as the dog
ordinance. Cats and dogs are subject to the same requirements for
licensing and shots as well as restrictions on permitted numbers
and leashes.
The second type of ordinance is stand alone and covers those same
concerns.
Either of these types of ordinance could be drafted for Farmington.
In addition to the actual ordinance, staff also investigated the
enforcement through animal control officers.
According to 4 Paws Animal Control, cat cases cost an average of
$144. each. This includes trapping, boarding for six days and
disposal. The claim rate for cats is only 4%, leaving 95%
unclaimed. That 96% would become the financial responsibility of
the City. While 4 Paws would be happy to provide a proposal they
added that other Cities have found it to be cost prohibitive.
It would be possible to adopt the ordinance and enforce only upon
complaint as we currently do with dogs. In 1996, staff anticipates
a total of 110 dog impounds. Of those 75% (78 dogs) are claimed.
I
CitlJ. of FarminfJton 325 Oak Street · Farminijton1 MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · FaK (612) 463.2591
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator
August 19, 1996
Page 2 of 2
Budqet Impact
If we estimate equal numbers of dogs and cats, we would anticipate
45 cat calls at $35. each and 110 cat impounds at $144. each. If
as predicted, only 4% are claimed, cat control would cost the City
of Farmington, $16,839. annually.
At present, this is an unbudgeted amount.
Action Reauired
Information only, as requested.
Respectfully submitted,
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
DMS/m
TO:
Administrato
FROM: Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Update on County Transportation Plan
DATE: August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Dakota County is in the process of updating the County's Transportation Plan and Policies. The County has
been working closely with the cities in updating their plan. City staff has attended a number of meetings to
provide input. This memo will update the Council on this process.
DISCUSSION
The County has been working on updating its Comprehensive Transportation Policy/Systems Plan. It is
anticipated that it will be approved by the County Board within the next six months. City Engineers in
Dakota County have prepared background information indicating the effect of County policy changes on
cities.
The following highlights significant impacts that will affect the City of Farmington;
Item 1
The City should support the County's participation in storm sewer construction which will increase to 55%
of the costs based on participating flows of County right of way.
This is a significant change which will be beneficial to the City. It specifically impacts Ash Street, Pilot
Knob and Elm Street improvement projects. The City has lobbied for this increase in funding for years.
This includes sedimentation basins and storm detention ponds.
Item 2
The City should oppose County participation in street lighting of signalized intersections only. Accordingly,
the City would be responsible for street lighting in all other County roadway locations, increasing our costs
substantially on roads not under City jurisdiction.
Item 3
The City should oppose the County not participating in shared funding of noise abatement projects. The
County wants this to be 100% City responsibility. The County also wants cities to take appropriate land use
actions to avoid noise abatement with new developments, which would mean that the City could incur costs
associated with moving proposed developments further away from a County roadway and having to deal
with cost issues of unused private land.
CitlJ of FarminfJton
1
3250akStreet.Farm;nijtonlMN5502~. (612) ~63.7111.FaJr (612) ~63.2591
Item 4
The City should oppose T.I.F. being reserved as a City's method of financing it's share of County road
projects rather than being applied before the 45/55 split is determined. This could result in City T.I.F.
providing 100% of the costs for County road improvements.
Item 5
The City should support this policy which will provide a County wide map identifying long term highway
needs and related right of way requirements which will help preserve these highway corridors for the future.
This applies to Farmington on future Pilot Knob, 195th and possibly 208th Street. If the City helps protect
these corridors through land use regulations, the County will participate in acquisition costs. One
potentially negative effect is that thorugh R.O.W. identification, land speculation cost could result in higher
acquisition costs.
Item 6
The City should approve the access spacing guidelines which work well for rural highways.
The City should oppose the policy for access needs on high density urban areas and request the County
establish urban standards. This specifically applies to:
A) Ash Street (Denmark to T.H. 3)
B) Elm Street (Division to T.H. 3)
C) 213th Street (T.H. 3 to eastern City limits)
The City has been involved in discussions with the County on development/redevelopment projects along
these County roads. Specifically, the following projects have been impacted by County access spacing
guidelines and conflicts with existing and/or proposed driveways;
e)
f)
Casey's Gas Station
Westview Townhomes
resulted in a reduction of existing driveways
resulted in a reduction of existing driveways
request for new driveway to Elm denied
resulted in reduction of condition to eliminate one driveway at the Nursing
Home
request for new driveway denied
request for access to Ash Street denied
a)
b)
c)
d)
City Center
Hardees
K wik Trip
SSMC
Item 7
The City should support these policies which will allow the County Plat Commission to review internal
street systems in new plats to ensure interconnection with other developments. It gives the commission the
opportunity to review and approve projects and will most likely require interconnections to provide traffic
flow.
These policies would have affected the City Council's approval of the Deer Meadows 1st Addition without
interconnects. This plat, among others, was used as an example for establishing these policies.
Item 8
The City should oppose this policy which could result in loss of City MSA funding on combined routes.
This could affect Farmington on the new Pilot Knob alignment. The City and County, as encouraged by
~r
2
MnDOT, will need to work closely to make changes in the MSA/CSAH systems to ensure no loss in MSA
funds.
Item 9
The City should oppose this policy which allows the County Engineer to have complete discretion on
improvements to County roads being turned back to cities. This could result in considerable City expense.
It is important for cities and Dakota county to enter into specific agreements for any turnback to prevent
financial hardship on cities. The cities should look favorably on policies that are similar to MnDOT's,
which require roads be brought up to current standards prior to the turnback. The County should provide
funding for these. upgrades in a manner similar to MnDOT's program.
This policy could have specific impacts on Farmington on 213th Street (C.R. 72). The City and County
have discussed the turnback possibilities on this roadway. This issue will become more significant as the
hospital, E. Farmington 2nd and township properties north of 213th continue to develop and increase traffic
on 213th Street.
Item 10
The City should support the evaluation of franchise fees for private use (i.e. fiber optics, pipelines,
telecommunications, etc.) on public right of ways.
Item 11
The City should support this policy improving safety and existing right of way crossings on Ash Street
(CSAH 74) and Elm Street (CSAH 50). The City should also request that this policy be expanded to include
safe rail road crossings on future corridors such as 208th Street and 195th Street.
Item 12
The City should support the designation of 10 ton routes. This specifically applies to CSAH 50 in
Farmington. This highway was a 10 ton road under MnDOT jurisdiction. The City has requested that this
10 ton designation continue. The current reconstruction has been planned for 10 ton designation. The City
should request that CSAH 50 be placed on the County's 10 ton system with connections to 1-35 and S.T.H.
52.
Item 13
The City should oppose this policy which proposes to expand the continuous plat ordinance to require cities
to demonstrate noise mitigation measures on new developments. This would involve the County on local
land use planning. This policy is closely related to F.C. 6 and AIM 1. It may require the City to secure
wide right of ways and provide noise mitigation measures (such as fencing, berms, vegetative screening,
etc.) with new developments. This could be very expensive to implement. The County is proposing
policies that would require noise mitigation to be 100% City cost that could have significant fmancial
impacts on the City. (This is related to Item 3 identified on page 1.)
Item 14
The City should oppose the County excluding streetlights from County maintenance. (This Item is related to
Item #2.)
Item 15
The City should support the County policies on signal preemption systems.
3
Item 16
The City should support this item which adopts the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
which concurs with current City policy.
There are other changes being proposed that will have minor impacts on the City, the ones listed above
highlight significant impacts.
BUDGET IMPACT
There are a number of policy changes being proposed in the County's Comprehensive Transportation
Policy/Systems Plan that will affect City budgets in the future. It is not very practical to determine the
extent of these budget impacts at this time. The potential budget impacts have been noted generally.
RECOMMENDATION
The process of updating the County plan has been long and involved, however, it will result in a very
comprehensive transportation plan that will benefit all cities in the County.
It is recommended that the City Council review these policy changes and provide direction to staff on any
concerns that should be forwarded to the County at this time. A draft copy of the comprehensive plan is
available in my office if you wish to review specific policies in more detail.
~~ctfullY Submitted,
.~l~//~"I
Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
TJK/ll
cc: file
Development Committee
~;
4
I .
0b
TO:
Mayor, Councilpersons,
City Administrato~
James Bell, Parks and
Recreation Director
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Western Dakota County
Ice Arena Proposal
DATE:
August 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission is proposing a multiple sheet ice arena for
western Dakota County.
DISCUSSION
A four (4) rink ice arena complex is being proposed for western Dakota County. The area
Communities will build the facility with the help of the Dakota County HRA. The total
cost of the project would be 9.5 million dollars. The Minnesota Amateur Sports
Commission would operate the facility after completion.
The financial obligations would be as follows:
1. 4 shares at $500,000 each. Cities could purchase a share or cooperate with
other cities to purchase partial shares.
2. Full share holders must purchase 2600 hours of ice time per year or pro rate it
based on the city's total contribution.
3. Mighty Ducks Grant of $500,000 would need to be obtained.
4. Dakota County HRA would be the issuing unit of government. A bond of 7
million would be sold.
Attached is a flyer outlining the program.
BUDGET IMP ACT
The City does not have the funds at this time to participate in this program. Staff
contacted Farmington Youth Hockey on their involvement in the program. They have
attended one meeting and are skeptical of the area communities ability to raise $500,000
each.
I
CitlJ. of FarminfJton
Staffhas concerns in terms of the financial impact the additional sheets of ice will have
on the present arenas in the area.
325 Oak Street · Farminijton1 MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · FlU (612) 463.2591
. .
ACTION REOUIRED
For Council information only.
,J.- ,1tS6~
Respectfully submitted,
James Bell
Parks and Recreation Director
.r;
"
, . .
~:-
:2~
l;l -
....8
'"^I;!
~o
~8
s:iil
~~
'< e.
og
C; e:
a-..
~~
~ ::
_ 3
5'
~
"'tl >
.2. ;a
I'D ;:;.
n -6'
;;- A>
Q. ;;-
[ Q.
~,
at :;
=
~
t::l
I'D
r::r
-
en
I'D
.,
~
;:;.
~
>
:I
Q
=
::I
-
Q
...
o
"0
I'D
.,
""
o
:I \
all
n
o
:;
"'"
....
""
o
~
!!
~ 00 0
i I [
a ~ g
.- oe. 5
~. e:
1>
'W.~
..
Q
5
-<
~
.,
:I
o
...
~
S'
A> "'tl
So ~ .2.
C') S' I'D
~ ~ ~
~ Q
::I r::r
:l I'D
~ ...,
g :r
A>
::I
n
I'D
0.
Ii
c:
S'
acl
c=
S:
D:
i
>
:I
o
=
::I
-
o
....
>
::I
::I
=
~
o
0:;-
n
Q
:I
2.
3"
I'D
;a
"'"
9-
~
~
",,,,c.,,mt:o>
51~!!i~3:a
c:; < s. ~ ~ ..
9 ~'5 ~ e:
_::I n
'<
g. Pr
-. ::r
~ 0.
:I-;t
I. !
~ is:
-.8
o c:
;; :1.
~..
::r
o
~
n
A:J
-n S
:t> 0 ~
"0 A:J m
"0 l/l
m
;; 0
~~ r ;::c
~ . ..... c: a:-
m co ^' m :z
. c:
;0 .t::J
::0 Z G)
0 U'l n
U'l ~
.... m
3: 0 ;::c ~
o . 0
c: ~ ~
z ~ :5:
.... ~
J:1 c: .t::J
. J>> Z
(J) ~ 3: ~
~ . ~ m ~
J>> ." ~
J:1 .. c:
.... ;0 r
:!: :z
2.
.fl -. tD m
0 :::I. ;::c
z
m m
1Il Z
m
=='
-t
;J ;l
~ [
;::;. ~
~ ." ." -g' 2.
:3 S =..=. I"':)
~ret3:iJ ~
~ :: ~ ~n ~_
~ s ~:3
~ ?f:-1 ~
3:-l ;;:!
2.. .a:
c::
"0
::;'
o
;a
n
o
a
..,
a:
s.
o'
:!
"'tl
o
;;;
a
~
n
o
:3
:I
=
:.
,<
."
t.>
;:l
?i'
-a'
t.>
::s
Pr
g:
~
n
o
::s
S.
0-
c:
c.
o
::l
N
::3 =l' V>
~ ~ 8
~ [~
III
..
cr
III
8..
g
~
c;
~
n
..
1>
<
~
~
('j
"'"'3
c:n
Yl
~
......
N
co
e::.
g
~
""1
o
=c
-
(t)
I
I
~
-.
:::s
~
:::s
(")
-.
~
-
'..............
,-
~ z
= ~
Q..-
r::;r o'
~ =
rJl ~
- -
-. ""l
/"') ~
~ /"')
~ 0
""l(JC:/
~ =
::s ::t."
~ -.
_. 0
= =
- ~
:rrJl
~ -
eg
OOr::;r
~ -.
. - (JC:/
(J'Q
~
rJl
-
~
fl)
n
....
-
a
sc.
o ~
VI ..,
...
o~
....0
S-~
~~
~ ~
~ S
o"d
~ 0
a...
;'C;
e. t::".
....a,
~~
~ CJQ
fl) ~
~~
O. ~
a'(;
~
.~ .~ .., ~. ~
-. -. .... !::l '::'l
~~~~S
.., .., .... fl) fl)
....OVl..,~
o ~ ~ "d O.
~ ~. S. '6 a,
.;e. .......... --"
~ ~ ~ ~
:t~~~
... '0 .... ~
:t ~....
~a~;:t.
"""......~
(ft' u' fl) ..;e.
7':' a S' ~
~~~~
(ft' "d .... 8:'
~. ~.~
"d"'~""
fl) .., ....0
",. ..... (") ...,
.... '=' fl) ~~
'=' ,:' '(; -
(JQ .... VI
a~s-
~ l'll
~ ~
= /"')
= 0
c: =
~ 0
~ 2.
0' ~.
""l :3
-"0
:r~
~ (')
00-
o 0
c: ....,
- f:f7
:r~
3:'0
~ =
-=
""l ~
o g
~ Q
""l
.,.. (t)
.~
....10 -
~13~lga"lS-:J
~i~itj~!!S"
i~o'l:)l:..iii'8
i!! ~J~ If ~
DJQ.-ct"5.\l~S:
;:gS-.....i::to"
~~wa~~..Q:~~
" " It ...
~.i;'
" Q'
....
VI
Po
l'll
VI
~
l'll
Po
...
o
a
..,
l'll
?}
~
~
l'll
'='
~
><
(')
-
c:
rJl
-.
<
~
""l
ciQ'
::r
-
-
o
r::;r
o
o
~
~
o
c:
""l
""l
:r
~
~
rJl
s:
~
:3
a
~
""l
(')
o
:3
:3
~ c:
o ::s
""l
~
rJl
"0
~
(')
--
:;.
~
""l
-.
::
~
-.
5- C".
('\l ~
rJl
to (')
c: ~
3 ::s
CI>
~ ::
0' ~
~ ~
::s ~
~~ ::s
Q..
Q..
~
/"')
o
""l
~
-
~
-.
/"')
~
-
S'
~
:i"
to
~
(')
='"
~
0-
a
o -
0: ::r
'-' t't>
-.
""l
C/.l l-4
l:i ::s
(D /"')
~ ~
o.:~
('\l rJl
O'~
3 Q..
p) 0
0'''0
-. "0
~ 0
::r ""l
o -
(') c:
="'::s
('\l _.
'< -
c;;'~
:5' 0'
(') ""l
~(J'Q
en _.
S' :l.
O'Q rJl
c:T ~
'< ::s
~Q..
oQ~
'" ~
('\l 0
~ S
('\l ~
~ ::s
@::rON
-d~~o.,
o ('\l P3 g
~ j'J c. =-
cr:gjgo
_. 0 ~ c:
=-: ....... ..,
~::r'(')V)
';<: 0 0 0
c: en ....
~ ~ C)
. =='
rJ'"r1=='
;::;" 0 c:
(ii' E; ~
en",O'Q
::r ~ c:
p) ;:1 fl)
<: _...,
('\l C1> ~
;::j en =='
o CIl -
CIl ::r ~
~ ~ .
~ ~ :
~s-e:
~('\lCl>
3 f{g ~.
p)p)-
S' ;;J 5.
(D g ('\l
::s ('\l en
p) ('\l c:T
;::j . 0
~;lS-
('\l g.
Q>g'
C Vl
.., ('\l
g. ~
0;' ?)O
en ('\l
('\l p)
p) ;::j
(') 0-
::r
CIl ,-.,
S. oj
(JQ V)
cr~
en .
::r~
('\l VI
~g
~~
[::I.
'" f.
.<3 h
-. 0
g 3
~'"
8 ~
en ('\l
~ 0-
~~
\00
v.~
3~
_.00
ag
o ~
;::j 8
~ S
cr" -. -- ...., ~ @ (")
a ~ ~ ciQ' '" ~ @
o::r':;jE;ga~
30~('\lenorJl
c:T(")oen:-;-aO
e.~en?;"'~ 0-
- '< ~ ~. S' ?r .ij
(D(ga:l""'1O
(") ""'1
-. ~
~ CIl
-.
~ ~
~
o
c
~
. ::r
'" ~ ~ -. en
~('\l::r'~~
X" D. g ::I. g.
Roe.-~ en
.., ('\l '" C1> ~
('\l < 0'" ... ...
(") 0 0'-.
~;::jO'Q ::s
~"'P3 (JQ
~ en 3
o' en
;::j
'"
..,
o
a:l
..,
~
a
en
oli--
""'1
o
(")
""'1
o
~
,..,.
o'
::s
o
"d
"d
o
""'1
,..,.
C
::s
.....
,..,.
(D'
CIl
6
""'1
onc.
""'1
i · I ...
:;:..
;::
~
~
.,
~
0-
-
~
::i
~
-
:::-
Q
l:l.
-
Q
~
~
~.
~
:J.
:::s
;.:..
~
::;.;
~
D.
-<:
~
('\l
~
o
cr'
5.
0:
~
eo
t'D
=
t'D
~
l""t-
r
0'
..,
:3
l'll
:3
e:r
('\l
..,
n
o
:3
:3
c:
2.
-
r;'
V)
~
.v c
, '\
/ \
/ J'
i
i .
V ~
1//
,I ./ ;
TO:
Mayor and Councilmembers
'~
FROM: John F. Erar, City Administrator
SUBJECT: CSAH 31 Project - Workshop
DATE: August 19,1996
INTRODUCTION
A financial review of the CSAH 31 project is in the process of being completed. It is suggested
that Council schedule a workshop to review this information and provide direction on how the
City would finance it share of the project's costs.
DISCUSSION
I would like to suggest August 26, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. for this workshop. Mr. Tom Truszinski, the
City's financial advisor, would be available to meet with Council to discuss project financing.
ACTION REQUESTED
Schedule a workshop to discuss CSAH 31 project financing.
Respectfully submitted,
"'i~(/~
John F. Erar
City Administrator
City of Farmin9ton 325 Oak Street · Farminijton1 MN 55024 · (612) 463.7111 · Fa", (612) ~63.2591
S. T.ia (itH, AI,.c. REALTOIS
,
(.11'.....' 'a"." II'. ".llc Allain
OIIc.: 452-"11, Fa: 452-2.11
CHRISTOPHER M. GALLER
5275 ONE HUNDRED NINE:11&;T'H STRttr, FARMINGTON. MN 55024
RE$IDDlcE 463-8477. OFF'lCE 452-6611. FAX 452-2911
Mayor & Qty COllndl
August 19, 1996
HE: COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA ITEMS
Late last week I fWlld cut tmt I needed to fly to Olicago today and and IMll be mable to attend
tonight's meeting. In talkil'lJ with Jdm rn Friday we reviewed the agenda items and I informed him
that I wOOd comment rn some d the issues.
Item 5G: PRIVATE BRUSH RfMOVAL - I crncur IMth Jim Bell's recommendatico relatoo to
ccotinuing the Oty's pdicy of not picking up private brush form the booIevards cr alleys. I also agree
that the Qty 1MB need the flexibility to declare an emergency situatlrn if an emergency situatirn occurs.
Item 6A: ZONING AMENDMENT - As we have dscussoo before, I agree with the expansico of the
size and height d accessory buildings. I also agree with staff co the issue of accessory buildings co lots
wlthcut a principal use.
Item 6C: TOWING CONTRACf. Althrugh it Is best to have a local company servlcil'lJ the Qty v.hen
ever pessible, the savlrgs as reflectoo by the bids requires that the Coundl shift service providers to
Dakota County TONing, Since this crntract is bid annuaHy, the current provider will have an
oppcrtmity to re-bid next year.
Item 7& EXaiANGE BANK BUILDING - The Gty Cruncil and HRA have worked for years tov.lll.rds
seeing the Exchange Bank renovated and back in bJsiness. Using the CDBG funds, that we receive
frem the federal government, is an appropriate use of these turns.
Item SE: ADDmONAL NURP PONDS - Unfortunately, we cannot afford the additirnal expendture
at tlis time to the Prairie WatetWlly Project. The Cruncil shooId ccosider shelving tlis proposal until
a later date in time. When the third phase is compIetoo, the pdential f(J" addtional fundil'lJ or
alternative financing optirns may become vlal:ie. The land to north of this sight may also provide a
furx:ling sauce not currently available to the Camcil.
Item 8F: CAT ORDINANCE - This is an issue that we should investigate further and crnsider using the
Oty Ad to demrnstrate to the citizens the diffictdty of funding this situation. I rnderstand the ccocern
and desire to take additiooal actim to ccrrect the situatim, but do not believe mest citizens realize the
cests invdved in adopting such an ordinance.
Item 9A: DAKOTA COUNlY TRANSPORTATION PlAN - Tom has drne a wcroerful jdl in
reviewing the Transportatirn Plan. The Oty shooId work to protect it's aut~ in development
issues and work 1Mth the Camty to reach a ccmprcmise pesition that addresses many d their
ccocems. Other cities are working co these issues and we shooId wcrk tcgether to find the appropriate
balance.
I hope ya.tr meeting goes smoothly ta1ight.
Sincerely,
C"-...ut:.p...eY" a.rr..Y"