Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.21.17 Council Packet Meeting Location: Farmington Farmington City Hall Minnesota 430 Third Street Farmington,MN 55024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA February 21, 2017 7:00 P.M. Action Taken 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OFALLEGL4NCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA S. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS a) Introduction of Public Works Director/City Engineer Katy Gehler Introduced 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS/RESPONSES TO COMMENTS(This time is reserved for citizen comments regarding non-agenda items.No official action can be taken on these items. Speakers are limited to five minutes to address the city council during citizen comment time.) 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Minutes of the February 6, 2017 City Council Meeting— Administration Approved b) Approve Minutes of the February 6, 2017 City Council Work Session— Administration Approved c) Approve Minutes of the February 13, 2017 City Council Work Session— Administration Approved d) Approve Lease Agreement Between City of Farmington and The Legacy of Farmington—Administration Approved e) Approve Appointments to Parks and Recreation Commission—City Council Approved f) Approve Clean Water Minnesota-Metro WaterShed Partners Membership— Engineering Approved g) Adopt Resolution Declaring Surplus Property-Fire R12-17 h) Approve Building Inspector Position Change from Part Time to Full Time— Human Resources Approved i) Appointment Recommendation Parks and Recreation—Human Resources Approved j) Approve Seasonal Hiring—Human Resources Approved k) Adopt Resolution Approving Gambling Event Permit Farmington Travel Baseball—Community Development R13-17 1) Approve Bills - Finance Approved REGULAR AGENDA 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS,REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Seed/Genstar Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan Update—Fairhill R14-17 b) Application to Amend Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to Commercial and Rezone Property from R-1 (Low Density Residential)to B-4 (Neighborhood Business)—Mr. Craig Bongard—20522 Akin Road Tabled to 3/6/17 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Wetland Health Evaluation Program Joint Powers Agreement R15-17 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. CITY COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN iEittRit , City of Farmington 4i 430 Third Street ' Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 '4MOO-° www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: David McKnight, City Administrator SUBJECT: Introduction of Public Works Director/City Engineer Katy Gehler DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION At the February 21, 2017 city council meeting you will be introduced to our new Public Works Director/City Engineer Katy Gehler. Katy comes to Farmington from a similar position with the city of Prior Lake. DISCUSSION NA BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Welcome Katy Gehler as our new Public Works Director/City Engineer. c.....,-,,kR,:,,,,---- City of Farmington p 430 Third Street ' Farmington,Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 t.A �° www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: David McKnight, City Administrator SUBJECT: Approve Minutes of the February 6, 2017 City Council Meeting-Administration DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION Attached for your review are the minutes from the February 6, 2017 city council meeting. DISCUSSION NA BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Approve the minutes from the February 6, 2017 city council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description o Backup Material February 6, 2017 City Council Minutes CITY OF FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 6,2017 1. Call to Order Mayor Larson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Larson led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Roll Call Present-Larson, Craig, Pitcher, Bartholomay and Donnelly Absent-None Staff Present-Administrator McKnight, Finance Director Hanson, Community Development Director Kienberger, Human Resources Director Wendlandt, Parks and Recreation Director Distad, Fire Chief Larsen, Police Chief Lindquist,Administrative Assistant Muller and Attorney Jamnik. 4. Agenda Motion by Bartholomay, second by Donnelly,to approve the agenda removing item 7B from the agenda. APIF, motion carried. 5. Announcements/Commendations a) Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation from the Shakopee Mdewkanton Sioux Community. Fire Chief Larsen shared that the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community has awarded two automated external defibrillators to the Farmington Fire Department and Farmington Police Department. Jenny McCloud and Rick Fisher made the presentation to the city. The city council expressed their appreciation for this generous donation. Motion by Bartholomay, second by Pitcher,to adopt resolution R4-2017 accepting donations to the Farmington Fire and Police Departments from the Shakopee Mdewkanton Sioux Community. APIF, motion carried. b) Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation from the Farmington Firefighters Relief Association February 6,2017 Minutes -1- Fire Chief Larsen presented a donation in the amount of$30,000 from the Farmington Fire Relief Association to the Farmington Fire Department. These funds will be deposited into the Fire Capital Projects Fund for future equipment purchases and to supplement special projects. Over the past four years the Fire Relief Association has donated over$100,000 to the department. Motion by Bartholomay,second by Craig,to adopt resolution R5-2017 accepting$30,000 from the Farmington Fire Relief Association to the Farmington Fire Department and acknowledge and thank the membership for the generous donation. APIF, motion carried. 6. Citizen Comments a) Response to Mr.Jason Lamberson 7. Consent Agenda Motion by Bartholomay,second by Donnelly,to approve the consent agenda: a) Approve Minutes of the January 17, 2017 City Council Meeting-Administration b) REMOVED c) Adopt Resolution R6-2017 Approving the Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update-Police d) Adopt Resolution R7-2017 Accepting Donation to the Rambling River Center-Parks e) Adopt Resolution R8-2017 Approving Gambling Event Permit for Vermillion River Longbeards-Community Development f) Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for Knights of Columbus-Community Development g) Adopt Resolution R9-2017 Approving an Application of the City of Farmington for Fiscal Year 2017 Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Funding-Community Development h) Adopt Resolution R10-2017 Approving Curbside Cleanup Day Agreement-Municipal Services i) Approve Seasonal Hiring-Human Resources j) Approve Bills-Finance APIF, motion carried. Councilmember Craig asked that item 7B, Adopt Resolution Approving a Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County for the Wetland Health Evaluation Program-Engineering, be pulled from the agenda and be brought back for further discussion. 8. Public Hearings a) On-Sale Beer and Wine License for Farmington Billiards February 6,2017 Minutes -2- Mayor Larson opened the public hearing. Administrative Assistant Muller presented an application for an on-sale beer and wine license for Farmington Billiards. Pursuant to city ordinance 3-12-6-2, a public hearing must be held to establish an on-sale beer and wine license. Mr.Jeffrey Wallis has submitted the required license fees and application for this license for Farmington Billiards located at 933 8th Street. The application and required documentation have been reviewed and approved by the Farmington Police Department. Mayor Larson asked for any comments from the public. No one in attendance desired to speak at the public hearing. Motion by Bartholomay,second by Pitcher,to close the public hearing. APIF, motion carried. Motion by Donnelly,second by Craig,to approve an on-sale beer and wine license for Farmington Billiards located at 933 8th Street. APIF, motion carried. Mr. Wallis introduced himself as the new owner of the Farmington Billiards and shared information about the business,some recent upgrades and hours of operation. b) Vacate Certain Drainage and Utility Easements within the Executive Estates Plat Community Development Director Kienberger presented a request to vacate certain drainage and utility easements within the Executive Estates subdivision to allow for the planning and future development of Prairie Pines Park. The drainage and utility easements affected by this vacation are within Lots 1-6, Block 5. Executive Estates was originally platted in 2005 and lots 1-6, Block 5 were platted for the development of single-family homes. However,these lots were deeded to the city in 2013 as part of a settlement agreement that was executed between the city and Roundbank to satisfy outstanding park dedication requirements for the development. As the city council is aware,the Parks and Recreation Department is currently in the process of developing a master plan for the Prairie Pines Park. In order to facilitate the programming of the parks the lots must be combined and interior easements vacated. All the interior easements are being proposed to be vacated with the exception of easements along the interior lot lines of Lots 2, 3,4 and 5, Block 5. This is due to the location of an existing catch basin and storm sewer line. Once the vacations are approved, staff will complete and submit to Dakota County the necessary documents to have Lots 1-6, Block 5 Executive Estates combined into one parcel identification number. February 6,2017 Minutes -3- Mayor Larson asked for any comments from the public. No one in attendance desired to speak at the public hearing. Motion by Bartholomay,second by Pitcher,to close the public hearing. APIF, motion carried. Motion by Donnelly, second by Craig,to adopt resolution R11-2017 vacating the drainage and utility easements depicted in exhibit A and described in exhibit B contingent upon the following: 1. The city clerk filing a certified copy of the resolution with the county auditor and county recorder of Dakota County. 9. Award of Contract None 10. Petitions, Requests and Communications None 11. Unfinished Business None 12. New Business a) Fourth Quarter 2016 and Year End New Construction Report and Population Estimate Community Development Director Kienberger shared information on the 2016 development activity in the city. Last year the city had 65 new single family and one multi-family unit built. In addition, city staff performed 3,590 inspections in a variety of areas. All of these numbers are up from 2015. City staff estimates the city population at the end of each quarter. The year end 2016 city population is 22,781. 13. City Council Roundtable Bartholomay-Thanked the Fire Relief Association for the annual banquet. Hanson-The new utility billing system roll out continues. Kienberger-Staff attended a ribbon cutting at the new Ti Larson State Farm Insurance and thanked everyone involved in another successful Community Expo. Wendlandt-Shared with the city council that the city has been awarded a Davy Award for the new city website. February 6,2017 Minutes -4- Larson-Thanked everyone involved in another successful Community Expo and encouraged everyone to shop local. Adjourn Motion by Bartholomay,second by Pitcher,to adjourn the meeting at 7:29 p.m. APIF, motion carried. Respectfully Submitted David McKnight, City Administrator February 6,2017 Minutes -5- 4E,►ii,64► City of Farmington U6° s 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 .n.,,,OO ,, www ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: David McKnight, City Administrator SUBJECT: Approve Minutes of the February 6, 2017 City Council Work Session-Administration DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION Attached for your review are the minutes from the February 6, 2017 city council work session. DISCUSSION NA BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Approve the minutes of the February 6, 2017 city council work session. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description © Backup Material February 6, 2017 Work Session Minutes CITY OF FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES WORK SESSION FEBRUARY 6,2017 Mayor Larson called the work session to order at 5:45 p.m. Roll Call Present-Larson, Donnelly, Bartholomay, Craig, and Pitcher Agenda Mayor Larson declared the agenda to be approved. Board and Commission Interviews The city council interviewed candidates for open board and commission seats City Administrator Update Administrator McKnight, Police Chief Lindquist and Community Development Director Kienberger reviewed a code enforcement issue that city staff and the city council have been involved with recently. The city council asked the mayor to respond to this resident sharing their concerns. Adjourn Mayor Larson adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted David McKnight, City Administrator February 6,2017 Work Session Minutes -1- ieat, City of Frmington ( Ilc. Street Farmington, Minnesota k.W„,. I 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 P.A PIS, www cifarmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council members and City Administrator FROM: David McKnight, City Administrator SUBJECT: Approve Minutes of the February 13, 2017 City Council Work Session-Administration DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION Attached for your review are the minutes from the February 13, 2017 city council work session. DISCUSSION NA BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Approve the minutes of the February 13, 2017 city council work session. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material February 13, 2017 Work Session Minutes CITY OF FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES WORK SESSION FEBRUARY 13,2017 Mayor Larson called the work session to order at 6:30 p.m. Roll Call Present-Larson, Donnelly, Bartholomay, Craig, and Pitcher Staff Present-Administrator McKnight, Police Chief Lindquist, Community Development Director Kienberger and Civil Engineer Schmeling Agenda Motion by Bartholomay, second by Pitcher,to approve the agenda. APIF, motion carried. McGrath Consulting Group Police Department Study Chief Lindquist and McGrath Consulting Group Project Manager/Senior Police Consultant Ron Moser presented the results of the staffing study for the police department. Near the end of 2016 the city council approved the study that focused on four major areas related to staffing. The four areas included: 1. Is the current level of staffing appropriate? 2. Is additional administrative staff needed? 3. What are the future staffing concerns based on projections for population, business activity and other trends in the city? 4. A review of retention and turnover of employees of the police department. Moser presented the findings of the report and answered questions on a variety of issues. The consultants included nine recommendations as a result of their work. These recommendations include: 1. Increase the current authorized number of patrol officers by two and place them in the patrol function. 2. Reduce the number of officers assigned to collateral duties with the Multi Agency Assistance Group (MAAG). 3. Expend department overtime codes to include, at a minimum,shift coverage and late calls to better understand and track overtime use. 4. Approve the position of captain. 5. Adopt one of the proposed revised organizational charts. February 13,2017 Work Session Minutes -1- 6. Direct the captain position to improve internal communication through regular operational meetings with Sergeants. 7. Direct the captain to create and implement a regular daily roll call briefing document for patrol. 8. Add four additional patrol officers to the department over the next two to three years; this includes the two recommended in number one. This should be phased in as residential and businesses growth occurs. 9. Prior to adding new officers to the department, prepare an updated field training program by sending officers to a field training officer course. The city council asked a number of questions of Moser and Lindquist on all of the recommendations. Lindquist updated the city council on the status of our current K-9 Bosco, potential future retirements and resignations and upcoming parental leaves in the department. Lindquist shared his desire would be to start the recruitment process immediately to create a list for potential patrol vacancies, hire a replacement this summer for a potential sergeant retirement later this year, hire a captain in early 2018 and an additional officer in mid-2018. After much discussion the city council consensus was to move forward with a replacement K-9 dog and training for the dog and officer starting in March 2017. In addition, move forward on creating a hiring list for patrol that may be needed in mid-2018. The requests for additional positions will be discussed in the near future looking at all potential department requests. Moser thanked the city council and police department for their work on the study. 2017 Drainage Improvement Projects Update Civil Engineer Schmeling updated the city council on two drainage improvement projects the Engineering Department is ready to put out to bid. In 2015/2016 residents of Embry Avenue notified staff of significant ice buildup occurring on the street. Staff investigated this issue and determined that the ice was being caused by a combination of discharge of upstream sump pumps and ground seepage coming out of the hill on the west side of Embry Avenue. The existing drain tile is damaged in many locations and not functioning. City staff estimates that this project will cost about$80,000 and will be funded through the Storm Water Utility Fund. In 2016 Bible Baptist Church notified staff of significant water flow from Akin Road over and through the church parking lot contributing to erosion downstream. The church also notified staff of an erosion problem occurring where the swale adjacent to the road drains to a downstream storm basin. Staff investigated these concerns and found them to be valid. February 13,2017 Work Session Minutes -2- To mitigate the issues an extension of curb on Akin Road on the east side is proposed along with a storm sewer system upgrade in the area. City staff will continue to work with the church on obtaining an easement to complete the Akin Road drainage improvements. City staff estimates this project will cost about$160,000 and will be funded through the Storm Water Utility Fund. The timeline for the two projects is tentatively set for bid in March 2017. The consensus of the city council was to move forward on both projects. Rambling River Center Plaza Discussion Community Development Director Kienberger reviewed the Rambling River Center Plaza master plan issue. The Downtown Redevelopment Plan was completed in April 2016. One of the action items for the plan includes designing and building a Rambling River Center Plaza. Over the course of 2016 the city council discussed this issue and eventually decided to not approve a contract for services for master planning this project in November 2016. The city council discussed a variety of issues related to the proposal including location, cost, neighboring business concerns, current condition of the parking lot and more. The consensus of the city council was to move forward with the master planning process. Staff will inquire with the consultant on the cost of the work. Building Inspector Position Classification Request Community Development Director Kienberger discussed the current status of our building inspection staff. Currently the city has one full time building official, one full time building inspector and one part time building inspector. Kienberger requested to make the part time building inspector full time to handle an increasing level of development activity in the city. Proactively changing the position to full time will allow for additional duties to be performed by the building official, shorter processing and inspection service times for both residential and commercial development projects, employee retention and ultimately department stability and succession. It is estimated that this staffing increase would cost approximately$30,000. These funds would be paid for through a combination of permit revenue,fund balance and other unspent General Fund dollars. The consensus of the city council was to move forward with this request. February 13,2017 Work Session Minutes -3- Heritage Preservation Commission City Code Discussion This item was tabled until the March 2017 work session. Adjourn Motion by Bartholomay, second by Donnelly,to adjourn the meeting at 9:07 p.m. Respectfully Submitted David McKnight, City Administrator February 13,2017 Work Session Minutes -4- ________ City of Farmington 4.7.4. 430 Third Street Farmington,Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 'a.A„tipo.° www.cifarmington.rrm.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: David McKnight, City Administrator SUBJECT: Approve Lease Agreement Between City of Farmington and The Legacy of Farmington-Administration DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION Recently the city was approach by representatives from The Legacy of Farmington about temporarily renting some space at city hall to be used as a leasing office for their project that is currently under construction in Farmington. DISCUSSION The Legacy of Farmington, a 70 unit assisted living facility, is currently under construction and located at 22300 Denmark Avenue in Farmington. The city council is well aware of this project and approved a tax increment finance district in 2016 to assist in the project development. Farlier this year representatives from the project were directed to me by a local realtor looking for short term office space to use as a leasing office for the project. Representatives from the Legacy toured city hall and found the expansion space on the second floor of city hall attractive. They were looking for space for one to three work spaces and some space to display information about the units they will be leasing. The attached draft lease was developed by the city attorney for the use of approximately 1,200 square feet (area defined on the attached floor plan), from March 1, 2017 through approximately August 31, 2017. The actual amount of time/space needed in August will be determined based upon the project completion date. The rent is set at$500 per month. As a comparison we charged the Dakota County Library$800 per month for the use of 5,000 square feet. Representatives have asked if they could use the entire expansion space for a few open houses on the project and city staff is comfortable with this request as well. This space is available to rent to a private business based on the refinancing of the bonds used to build this space that you approved in late 2016. City staff considers the Legacy project a partner in our continued development with the city's participation in the tax increment finance district last year and was very willing to work with this group to provide them with space to help move their project to the next stage. BUDGET IMPACT The revenue received from this lease will be placed in rental income line of the annual General Fund budget. ACTION REQUESTED Review the draft lease and ask any questions you may have. Once your questions are answered a motion should be made to approve the lease agreement between the City of Farmington and The Legacy of Farmington for the lease of space at city hall ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Contract Draft Lease • • • 'PEASE AGREEMENT • • • -11,1f$.XSARE AGIMEMENT(the"Lease')made and entered into this 8-6 day of Februarys 2017k by and hotWeen the CITY OF FARM1NQT0N,a Minim*inunicipal oor.j?oration.("City,and THE LEGACY OF FARMINGTON,.a Minnesota fe4de,),4,tvaA ?)1)111Clunk.whose addrestl 2a(WMat34,&10.t,.Fantington, hrtanesOta 55024 %wine), minus,the City is the owner of certain real property located at 430 Third Street Pennington,Minnesota 55024 rProperty").and the office.building located thereon( aq Hall"); Ana WOMA.AS,thel-tes 4041'08 to 104Pa*.mthe City aAnktV3imateily L20 Squalv.•.f.001 within a portion oftha second floor of the City Hall,as shown on thoAtaaltedDilabit'A" ("Leased PremiSes")puttuant to the•terrns,covenenta and conditions ofthis Leas.e4•ind WHEREAS,the Cityand'Lessee desire to outer into this Lease Agreement.setting forth • thq terms Le$See's use of thetXmiseti PrgtIniseS, NOWi THEREFORE.,in Consideration of the ftnitual covenants and nit=dents herein, it is hereby mutually agreed by the parties as follow 1. Leased Premises. The City,in consideration of the Rent Os horebgitter 41404 andthe ovens*,fortis.and.conditions ofthis Lease,does hereby demise)lease and let unto the Lessee,and the Lessee.does hereby rent,lease,hire and take from the City,subject to thetenns, covenants and tonditions.o.f this Leasel tb_o l'rernises" gilibit".M., • 2. Xerms and"Use, The Lessee takes and:rents.the Leased Premises-OM the City "as is"and "Where Williout any liability or obligation on the part of the Qty t•9 make Any alterationintproVetnents Olt repairS Of:any kind or nature,on.o about said ItaSellikeinises for. the term of six(6) connnencing on March 1 2017 to appri*Iniately Aqua 10;201'1 ( Term"), 3. bk. Lessee shall pay the City as"Rent" for the Leased Premises,the sum Of Five Hundred Dollars($500.00).pet Month,.which Rent shall be•due.and payable-beginning on .March 1,2.017 and continunig on the r day of deli tonal-titer-ballet nail the.end oith Lee Term, 4. Use. The Lessee shall use the Leased Premises solely for its'business and shall not permit the Leased Eternises to be Used for any other pinpose,Lessee shall not tise And shall not penult the LW()Prernises to be uSed inany WaY that Woirild cause a oancellatiOn,restriotioii or increase in premium ate City's insurance.Lessee shall abide by and conform to all statutes, ordinances,. rules and regulations relating to the use and occupancy of the Leased Promises. Lessee shall comply with all City policies related to use of City Hall, 1 191140v1 • • S. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee may not assign this Lease without the prier written consent-of the City,which consent may be granted or withheld in City's sole discretion. G. tJtilities. Lessee will not:he.charged for any utilities including,but not iimited'to, gas,water,sewer,electric and telephone,used during the Term of this Lease. 7. Maintenance and Repair. Lessee agrees to keep,repair and maintain at its sole cost and expense the Leased Premises at all times during the Term of this.Lease,and will quit and deliverup the Leased Premises to the City,peacefully and quietly at the end of the Terni,of upon other termination, in as.good of and condition, as the Leased Premises was at the commencement of this Lease,reasonable use and wear thereof accepted. The Lessee will further keep the Leased Premises in a neat,clean and respectable condition at the Lessee's sole cost and expense. The Lessee will riot.make or suffer any Waste thereon or thereof and will not use the Leased Premises or any part thereof for any purpose galled extra hazardous by insurance companies,and will comply in all respects with all present and future environmental laws,Pares and regulations. 8. nsuraiace. The Lessee shall at its own cost and expense.keep all of its personal property and equipment footed din,the Lased Premises insured wit"all risk"insurance. [OPTIONAL PA GRAPH:I Lessee! further isteesto natty. *Pity nisaranae In the amount-of One Million Dollard ($1,O00.;.0OG.00). The City shall'be named as an additional insured:on the policy:on a;primary and.noncontributoii Naas, And.like .Lessee shall .file.with the City :a pettifieate...evidetoiag coverage upon execution•dibiS :LOW fikgrekinillt ,ore:)request:by:The O1ty The Lostee will endeavor to include the ortifiegte that*ie City mist be;given tan OOH days advance Witten .notice etc cancellation of iT insuranep, 9. Limitation of Liabilitv/fndeninification. The Lessee agrees that'the said'City shall not be liable for any.loss or damage directly or Indirectly or otherwise wbloh may be sustained by the Lessee or others by the reason of water damage whicii.may rest*.from frepzirng, bursting, overflowing or defect of any'kind including water, sewer, gas, pipes, closets, toilets, sinks or leaks from the roof in of about the Leased Premises.including but not limited to losses Or damage by the reason of the present Or future condition of repair of said Leased Premises or for loss or damage arising or omissions of Lessee. Lessee hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless City and City's officials, agents, employees guests and invitees,from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, suits, proceedings, liabilities, damages, losses, costs, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys'fees,caused by,incurred,or resulting from Lessee's(1)occupancy,use Or operation of the Leased Premises,or(II)from any default under or failure to perform any term or provision of this Lease by Lessee or (iii) negligence or willful acts of the Lessee. This indemnity does not cover matters arising out.of the gross negligence or willful rnisconduct of City or its officials, employees, agents, guests and invitees, it is expressly understood that Lessee's obligations under this Section shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease for any reason. In case any action or proceeding is brought against City or its officials,agents,employees,guests 2 191140v] • or invitees by reason of any such claim, Lessee, upon notice, will defend such action or proceeding by responsible counsel selected by Lessee arid reasonably acceptable to City. • 10. Insnection of Leased Premises, The City,its employees,agents and eontraetors may enter the Leased Premises for n reasonable business purpose. The City must first utake.a good faith effort to give reasonable notice to The Lessee oldie intent to enter,except in the event Of all emergency,when no notice is regi ir'ed. 11: Default Remedies. If the Rent Rayments,whether the same be demanded or not, are not paid when due; or if the Leased Premises shall be used for any other purpose or use other than as specified herein; or if any damage shall occur and not be repaired as required herein;or this Lease shall be assigned or sublet without the written consent of the City;.or if the Lessee fails to ooinply with any of the tennis, cc ditions or'cOVenants of this Lease or if Lessee makes an essignineet fot benefit of creditors or Lessee files a petition in bankruptcy or is adjudicated bankrupt it shall be a 'default"under the terms of Ibis Lease, The Lessee does hereby authorize and My empower the City after there has been a default under the terms of this Lease to terminate this Tease upon ten 00)days written'notice to Leasee and to re-enter and take possession of the Leased Premises immediately.as allowed by law,and to remove all persons and tlleir property without notice of intention to re-enter except as provided herein or by applicable law, and to use such force and assistance in effecting and perfecting such removal as the City may deem advisable,and as allowed by law,and to recover at Once-full and exclusive possession of'the Leased Premises, whether in possession Of the Lessee or of third petsoes, or vacant. The City may at its Option at any time after a default of violation of condition 4::)r covenant,re-enter and take possession of the Leased Premises,Without such re-entering working a forfeiture of the Rents to be paid and the covenants to be kept by the Lessee for the term of this Lease. • 12, Damage or Destruction, If the Leased Premises is damaged or destroyed by fire or other.casualty to the extent that the Lessee's enjoyment ofthe Leased Premises is substantially impaired,Lessee may (a)'immediately vacate the Leased Premises and notify City in writing within ten (10) business days of Lessee's intention to terminate this Leases in which case the Lease shall terminate as Of the date of the Lessee.vacating the Leased Premises; or (b) If continued occupancy is laWful, vacate a part of the Leased Premises rendered unusable by the fire or other casualty,in which case Lessee's liability for Rent is reduced in proportion to the diminution in the fair rental value of the Leased Premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing,if the •Lease Is not terminated by the Lessee as provided herein, and the Leased Promises cannot reasonably be repaired within thirty 00)days from the date of'such damage,or If the City elects in its sole discretion not to repair such damage,the City may give the Lessee written'notice that it is not going to repair the damage-to the Leased Premises and that the City is terminating the Lease and the Lease shall there upon be terminated effective as of the date of the damage and the Lessee shall remove alt of its property and/or equipment from the Leased Premises. 13. Molding Over. Lessee will,at the expiration of this Lease Agreement,whether by lapse of time or termination,give up immediate possession to the City. If Lessee fails to give up possession the City may, at its option, serve written notice upon Lessee that such holdover 3 191140v1 • constitutes a creation of a tenancy at sufferance..If the City does not give said notice,Lessee's holdover shall.create a tenancy at'sufferance, In.any stroll event the tenancy.4101 be upon the teens and conditions of this Lease Agreement,except that Lessee shall be obligated to pay to the City rent in the amount of$500.00 per month on the 151 day of each month,(which rent Shall be prorated on the basis of a 1365 day year for each day Lessee remains in possession); excepting further that no notices shall be required prior to co unencement of any legal Motion to gain repossession of the Premises. Lessee shall also pay to the City:all damages sustained by the City resulting from retention of possession by Lessee. The provisions-of this paragraph shall not Constitute 4waiver by the City of any right of reentry as otherwise available to the City;nor shall receipt of any rent or any other act consistent with continued tenancy operate as a waiver of the right to terminate this Lease Agreement for a.breach by Lessee hereof. 14. Notice. All notices,demands,requests, consents,approvals,or other instruments required or permitted to be given by either party pursuant to this Lease.shall be in writing and sent to the Other part at the following addresses; To City: City of Pennington. 430 Third Street . .Pennington,.Minnesota 55024 • To Lessee: The Legacy of Farmington • Attention: Casteele Miller 22300 Denmark Avenue Farmington,lv nnesota 55024 • All notices to Lessee shall be effective if given to Lessee at the.address'set forth herein, All notices shall be deemed received When delivered, if hand-delivered, or three businessdays after deposit with the United State Postal Service, postage prepaid and sent'by certified malt, return receipt requested,or one business day after deposit With riationally.recognized overnight onnrmercial courier service,air bill prepaid. Notices by telefax or e-mail along are not suff14ient The addresses for notices may be changed by the parties from time to time by delivery of written notice to the other party:as provided herein, 15. Waiver and Amendment. No provision of this Lease.shall be deemed waived or amended exeept by a written instrument unambiguously setting forth the matter waived or amended and signed by the party against which enforcement of'such waiver or amendment is sought. Waiver of any matter shall not be deemed'a waiver of the:same or any other matter on any future obcaaion. 16. Binding tIffect. All the covenants, terms and conditions of this Lease shall extend, apply to and firmly bind the hairs, executors, administrators,successors and assigns'of the respective party hereto as fully •as the respective party are themselves bound, but this provision shall not authorize the assignment or underletting of this Lease contrary to the provisions hereinbefore contained, 4 191140v1 • 17. Severaj ility. If any of the terms or provisions contained herein shall be declared to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction,then thexemaining provisions and conditions of this Lease, or the application of such to'persons of circumstances other than (hose to which it is declared invalid or unenforceable,'shall not be affected thereby and shall remain ie frill force.and effect and shall.be valid and enforceable to the:fullest extent permitted bylaw. 10, Atiplicable Law and Venue. This Lease shall be goverired by and construed Sn accordance With the laws of the state of Minnesota. Any action to declare or enforce any tights • or obligations under this Lease maybe commenced by any part hi Dalsota County District Court. City and Lessee hereby consent to the jurisdiction of such courtfor sudh purposes and agree that any notice,complaint or other legal process delivered to City or Lessee shall constitute adequate notice and service of process for all pufposes And shall subjeet.City arid Lessee to the jurisdictiori of such court.for purposes of adjudicating any matter related to this Lease. 19. .ttorrrev's'Fees. In the event of any litigation between City and Lessee to enforce any of the provisions of this Lease or any tight of either"party hereto, the unsuccessful party to such litigation agrees to pay to the successful part all costs and expenses,keludhag all reasonable attorney ;fees, const costs and all other costs and expenses.ingliitca therein by the successful party,all of which shall be included in and as a part of the judgment rendered ih such litigation. 20. !Captious. The captions of the Sections and subsections of this Lease are for convenience only,and are intended and shall not be deemed for any purpose whatever to modify, explain or place"any construction upon any of the provisions of this Lease 21. interpretation. The language in all parts of this Lease.shall.be construed simply according to its Fair meaning and not strictly for or against City or Lessee,Airy reference to any Seotlort herein•shall be deemed to inollide all subsections thereof unless'otherwise specified or • reasonably required from*context, 22. City/Lessee Relationship. Nothing contained in this Lease shall be deemed or construed to create the relationship of principal and agent or that of partnership.or of joint venture or of anyassociation between City and Lessee,and neither the method of computation of resit,nor any.other provisions contained in this Lease,nor any acts of*parties hereto shall be deemed to create any relationship between City and Lessee other than the relationship of City/Lessee, 2$, Waiver of Default. No waiver by City of any provision of this Lease shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision hereof or of any subsequent breach by Lessee of the same or any other provision, No delay on the part of City in exercising any of its right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of such rights or of any other right of City,nor shall any delay,omission or waiver on any one occasion be deemed a bar to or a waiver of the same or ally other right on any other.occasion.Neither City's failure to bill Lessee for any rent or additional sum as it becomes due hereunder nor its error in such billing or failure to provide any other documentation in connection therewith shall operate as a waiver of City's right to collect any • .5 19t140v1 such rent or additional sum which may at any time become duo hereunder•iris the full Mount to which City is entitled pursuant to the terms and provisions hereof.City's,consent to or approval of any act by Lessee requiring City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to render unnecessary the obtaining of.City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Lessee 'vliether or not similar to the•act'so cdnsented to.or.approved, 24. Entire Agreement; Amendments. This Leaseaaconstitutes the-entire agreement between'the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof,end no.prior written or oral agreement or any contemporaneous oral Or written understanding pertaining to any subh matter shall be effective for any purpose.No prevision of this Lease may be amended or supplemented except by an agreement'in'writing sigtied by the party orparties to be bound thereby. 25. Provisions Severable, No provision of this Lease which proves to be invalid, void or illegal shall in, any'way-affect,impair or.invalidate any other provision hereof and the remaining provisions hereof shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect. 26. Recording of Agreement. Lessee shall not•record this Agreement on the Public Records of any public office. In the event that Lessee shall record this Agreement, this Agreement shall,.at City's option, terminate immediately and the City shall be.entitled to all rights and remedies that it has at law or in equity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have hereunto set their hands effective the day and year first above written. • CITY OF F. ' GTON • B p c7sty 9 L.. r ,. - ,.., /1/ 3'®/" By. f avid d.Me 4' g � .ifX Aciminlstrator • LESSEE: THE EGA, OF FARMINGTON By: I ' 11,WA, feels Miller • • Title: �C,1k V , t v'ftkw 6 1911400 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o?7 day of February, 2b17,by �j David J.McKnight,the ,gayoi n Lt City reapeetively, of the'City o armington,a�esota inun1eip orjiora ion, n behalf of the ao1poratioii1,and pursuant to the authority.granted by its City Council; "' ''' CYNTHIA A. MULLER' Xi'7`e_ . 'ii•t-,,-.- NOTARY PUBL}C-MNNESOTA Wtary Public • ,fie rr- My Commission Expires r-r?!a,• January 31,2019 if it STATE OF MINNESOTA .) )ss COUNTY OP DAKOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this . Q_ day of February, 2017,by Casteele Miller,the Executive Director o e Leg cy of Farnnington. • Notary1 ublie ,/ I 11.,34, LAURIE LYNN HONZA ' t i 416,'A Notary Public F -.r-q) Minnesota w�- . My Comm.Expires • THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY; ' Jan 31,2020 CAMPBELL KNUTSON,P.A. 860 Blue Gentian Road,Suite 290 ._. Eagan,Minnesota $5121. 6.51.-452-5000 CJJJ] 7 191140v1 co1I — c3 o N ` 1 a_ U "YY E e-' E O o Q U v_ V� 1 2(3 U EE?g a v a Irill 6.J -e,7 I d C.. i C-1 \; _ o w --1-- -11 ,-6 1,Ft; 5a t II l `b G' ( G oma' ' ..- ^c iI a .I E. t �.� t= ;'��— a, , E $ €g lid t is . t. 1, o0 z 3 p C��i our < - c Ilia II E. .11 t I' 4 e Imo°=--_ I • <g G �� ', 9 4 oil ,:., Aj p r — 12) 2)1_0 2i_-) ; JôL8 -- — --,-- — o� > B g .-1 E Q i , m ' E j a m ❑❑oa0•DD C a)E U O 17 C O .0 N C 0 O U O 0) c_ 1 E 6 R = _ LL _a co o v n' >, 0 o O Z U v IIIDiff ISI ! MP isi no - I iii. M ! r m _ NM 0ARH4 City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota o 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 ' .Asolos4° www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Cynthia Muller,Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Approve Appointments to Parks and Recreation Commission-City Council DATE: February 21,2017 INTRODUCTION There are two vacant seats on the Parks and Recreation Commission. DISCUSSION The city council interviewed two candidates for vacant seats on the Parks and Recreation Commission. The city council is recommending appointing Hannah Simmons and Laurie Suchanek to this commission. The terms of these seats are through January 31, 2020. BUDGET IMPACT Board members are paid a stipend of$20 per meeting attended which is included in the 2017 budget. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the appointments of Hannah Simmons and Laurie Suchanek to the Parks and Recreation Commission for the above stated term. C AR,ti� City of Farmington z430 Third Street Farmington,Minnesota ;.. 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 ,�pR000.° www.cifarmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Jennifer Dullum,Natural Resource Specialist SUBJECT: Approve Clean Water Minnesota-Metro WaterShed Partners Membership-Engineering DATE: February 21,2017 INTRODUCTION Metro WaterShed Partners is a coalition of over 60 public,private and non-profit organizations in the Twin Cities. The WaterShed Partners believe that by working together and pooling resources, they can reach more people with information about the importance of clean water and what to do to keep it clean. Clean Water Minnesota is a collaborative outreach project of the Metro Watershed Partners. DISCUSSION In 2016 the Metro WaterShed Partners kicked off the first year of a three-year project to produce the very best clean water educational messages and programs,based on the latest research in social science, for their members to use in outreach and communications. A new website was launched at cleanwatermn.org,with new photography,blog stories,and downloadable informational resources. The Metro WaterShed Partners created and implemented a system to track engagement with these resources,which measures the impact of the campaign overall,and in each member's service area. With continued support in 2017 the Metro WaterShed Partners will produce twelve new, seasonally appropriate blog stories about community members in the metro area taking action to protect lakes and rivers, along with new photographs and informational resources for members to use in their education and outreach work. They will continue to build their following on social media, and help members build theirs. Metro WaterShed Partners will host trainings and meetings to help members use Clean Water MN resources, and build new audiences for clean water messages. In addition,they will begin to build the foundation and framework for a metro-wide Adopt-a-Drain program,with promotional resources and activities, including a toolkit to support community clean-up events with a neighborhood focus, aimed to inspire residents to sweep up,rake up, and pick up streets and sidewalks in the metro area. BUDGET IMPACT The total cost of this work will be$120,000 per year. For Farmington, an MPCA permitted city, our membership contribution helps us meet our MS4 public education requirements. The contribution requested for a city with a population between 20,000—29,999 is $1,000.00-$1,499.00. Funding does exist in the current programming expense budget in the stormwater fund. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the expenditure of$1,000.00 to support the Metro WaterShed Partners and the Clean Water Minnesota campaign. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description 0 Backup Material membership invoice FROM Staff Contact City Name: MINNESOTA WATER Address: LET'S KEEP IT CLEAN City and Zip: Membership Telephone: \VOICE E-mail: TO Metro Watershed Partners and its Clean Water MN Media Campaign MEMBERSHIP AMOUNT Note:(see attached table with requested levels of funding) FISCAL AGENT Hamline University 1536 HewittAve. MS-A1760 St.Paul,MN 55104 Tel:651-523-2812 Email:jlarson25@hamline.edu DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE 2017 membership support for the Metro WaterShed Partners and its Clean Water MN Media Campaign,a stormwater pollution prevention education campaign.Services include: • Create timely,consistent messages that will encourage behaviors that improve water quality. • Technology trainings for partners to use these tools effectively. • Development and implementation of clean water exhibits at the Minnesota State Fair in the DNR and Eco-experience buildings. • Monthly meetings with information on partner activities,presentations by informative speakers,and updates on WSP activities. • Maintenance of the Watershed Partners listserv. • Administration of media outreach and partner events and activities. • Evaluate,maintain and improve the Clean Water MN materials and website. • Begin to develop the framework for a metro wide adopt-a-drain program,which incorporates community clean-up events. DURATION OF SERVICE January I,2017 to December 31,2017 $120,000 is needed to fully implement year 2 activities.We will initiate phased implementation of the campaign upon receiving a minimum of$70,000 in contributions.Funds unspent in 2017 will carry over to 2018 to continue project implementation. �o�Eh►Ri46� City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 A Ldp www cLfannington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Jim Larsen, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Declaring Surplus Property-Fire DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION Farmington Fire Department(FFD)staff recommends declaring surplus property in the department. DISCUSSION Firefighter Ken Kelly retired from active service with the FFD on January 22,2017 after ten(10)years of service.A request has been made to present his firefighting helmet to him as a gift in recognition of his years of service. Pursuant to city policy adopted last year,the helmet must be declared as surplus property before it can be purchased by the interested party. BUDGET IMPACT The old helmet will be purchased for$240.00 which is the cost to the city to purchase a new helmet. The adopted policy is budget neutral to the FFD and the city. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt a resolution declaring one firefighting helmet as surplus property in the Farmington Fire Department. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Cover Memo A Resolution Declaring Surplus Property of the FFD RESOLUTION NO. R12-17 A RESOLUTION DECLARING SURPLUS PROPERTY IN THE FARMINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington was held at the Farmington City Hall on the 21st day of February 2017 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Bartholomay, Craig, Donnelly, Pitcher Members Absent: Larson Member Craig introduced and Member Donnelly seconded the following: WHEREAS,the Mayor and City Council of the city of Farmington have previously adopted a policy for the purchase of firefighting helmets by retired firefighters; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Ken Kelly retired on January 22, 2017 after ten(10)years of service; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that,after due consideration,the Mayor and City Council of the city of Farmington, Minnesota, hereby declare his Black, 2009 Bullard UST Firefighting Helmet as surplus property and authorize the City Administrator or his designee to arrange for the sale and replacement of said equipment. This resolution was adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21st day of February 2017. Jason t artholomay, Acting Mayor Attested to the 1744 day of February 2017. /1/ -s David McKnight, ministrator SEAL 44•oE�n►�►ii4�► City of Farmington ' 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 , .A S www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Approve Building Inspector Position Change from Part Time to Full Time-Human Resources DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memorandum is to request increasing the part-time building inspector position to a full- time ulltime benefit eligible position;and to promote the part-time Building Inspector, Lonell Johnson, into the full- time ulltime position. DISCUSSION Staff is requesting that the part-time Building Inspector position become full-time to handle an increasing level of development activity in the city and reflect the recommended staffing minimum for the department. Mr. Johnson has been employed by the city since July of 2016 and has had a positive impact on the department and building community. Moving Mr. Johnson to full-time will allow for additional duties to be performed by the Building Official, shorter processing and inspection service times for both residential and commercial development projects, employee retention, and ultimately department stability and succession. BUDGET IMPACT The Building Inspections Department is self-funded by revenues from permit and inspection fees. The projected cost to increase the position from part-time to full-time with benefits is approximately$30,000. This is currently unbudgeted,but would be accommodated within the 2017 budget through a combination of anticipated increased inspections revenue, fund balance, or other unspent general fund dollars. In 2018 and ahead,this would be budgeted as we typically do for all positions within a department. Please note that Mr. Johnson's current hourly rate is$30.16 per hour which is step one of the salary range for this position(salary range:$30.16-$37.70 per hour). This salary range would not change due to this transition. ACTION REQUESTED The action requested is: 1)Approve the request to change the part-time building inspector position to a full-time benefit eligible position; and 2)Promote Mr.Lonell Johnson from part-time to full-time effective February 27,2017. (46---10s* Ni� City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 www.cifarmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Brenda Wendlandt,Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Appointment Recommendation Parks and Recreation-Human Resources DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of a full-time Recreation Supervisor, to fill a vacant position, has been completed. DISCUSSION After a thorough review by the Parks and Recreation and Human Resources Departments, a contingent offer of employment has been made to Ryan Hayes, subject to passing the background check,pre-employment drug test and ratification by the city counciL Mr. Hayes has experience supervising recreation programs and he meets the qualifications for this position. BUDGET IMPACT Mr. Hayes's starting salary will be$62,731 per year which is step 1 of the salary range for this position (salary range:$62,731-$78,413). Funding for this position is provided for in the 2017 budget. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the appointment of Ryan Hayes as Recreation Supervisor effective on March 6,2017. City of Farmington (/ M ' Farmington, Minnesota „..0) 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 '°47..,,PRO* www ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Approve Seasonal Hiring-Human Resouces DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of the attached list of seasonal staff has been completed. DISCUSSION After a thorough review by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Human Resources Department, offers of employment have been made to the individuals show on the attached spreadsheet, subject to ratification by city council BUDGET IMPACT These positions are included in various departmental budgets. ACTION REQUESTED By motion approve the attached seasonal employment recommendations. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description © Backup Material Seasonal Staff Listing a O. CU s a' N WI I O .O ++ U y 7 O .F a v) to c +P ca Y N -D lQ N CD LO — �Lb ce C N a O in CO 0 d CO 0 C CD L Q T 0 N d E eo Z C L a m C>. E Q 41ARMi City of Farmington 4.4 ,6 430 Third Street cs Farmington,Minnesota e 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 ' ..4, �°,: www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Cynthia Muller,Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Approving Gambling Event Permit Farmington Travel Baseball- Community aseballCommunity Development DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION Farmington Travel Baseball is requesting a gambling event permit for a raffle fundraiser. DISCUSSION Per State Statute 349.166 and pertinent city code, a gambling event permit must be issued by the city for this type of event. An application has been received, along with the appropriate fees. The city attorney has reviewed the application and the attached resolution approving the request. BUDGET IMPACT Gambling fees are included in the revenue portion of the 2017 budget. ACTION REQUESTED Consider the attached resolution granting a gambling event permit to Farmington Travel Baseball to be held at Celt's Pub &Grill, 200 Third Street, on March 18, 2017. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Resolution Resolution RESOLUTION NO. R13-17 APPROVING A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR FARMINGTON TRAVEL BASEBALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof,a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington,Minnesota,was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21st day of February 2017 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Bartholomay, Craig,Donnelly,Pitcher Members Absent: Larson Member Craig introduced and Member Donnelly seconded the following: WHEREAS,pursuant to M.S. 349.166,the State of Minnesota Gambling Board may not issue or renew a Gambling Event Permit unless the City Council adopts a resolution approving said permit; and, WHEREAS,Farmington Travel Baseball has submitted an application for a Gambling Event Permit to be conducted at 200 Third Street,on March 18,2017,for Council consideration. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Farmington City Council that the Gambling Event Permit for Farmington Travel Baseball,to be held at 200 Third Street,is hereby approved. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City C• _.• ' in open sessio I on the 21St day of February 2017. .44OPPP son Bartholomay, cting Mayor Attested to the 0.1?'`h day of February 2017. Ci Administrat r SEAL � o4110j City of Farmington4 h p 430 Third Street /I Farmington,Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 r.,, f'° www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Robin Hanson, Finance Director SUBJECT: Approve Bills-Finance DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION Attached are the February 1, 2017 through February 15, 2017 check payments for your consideration. DISCUSSION NA BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Approve the attached payments. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material Council Register February 1 - 15, 2017 v) U 0 0 x a N" al Z o w 0 N oC a. pa a a 41P.4 cm o oas qal al al al ti 0x o w0 w 0� d d a aC v u 0 0 0 0 i 0 F • JE w wc21 as w 0 0 0 0 C Ccn a .w.. m .w. .7 U U U Z w 00 Z z a o m a a1 a� ald 0 U DI -di O O ] rs C7 M cn W Cl) aal oz0 0 w C4 s 0 cn w 0 ] ] a g m to .n 0 on o in Z m 00 1. 1. N 3 C C• or NN N SO 3 € N • 0 8 o4 N nt m 0 0 o o 4. o -o o 0 v a �so r. Er. 0 04 04 w 8 a ' so W Wre U Cl. ° t� 8,�7 - 3 Q N r- O a4 so ''j U O i 0 .0 N N �w1 O N O ct O i SO N U \� 4 00 O O O [i!.] - O en en eSO n ^+ U N UC N .Ni E. O O N N 000 .,-� U 01 CO O Yf V] n r- g O (n en k. 0 U b .�-� 00 .M-i N NN 0 [...• N tin N z OS MU en en en en O h ti h h en h h d U w �, 00 0 U Rio OQ i U O z} cn ea Fw4 ti O C7 a O Nx U a 6 " x a O 0 ii 1 en 4, g. ct 9 est al en u een �C 00 0 o ra so en 0 a W eon en O i O q O O ^e .Z o 'M CO .el3 S ne, ' - w 5 a a Cl. awa A A of in O O O O O O O 00 00 en en co O O O 00 00 SO C Co SO o in en o 0 0 o v v v v o o N o o 0o en o R C 00 00 o o O� O1 O O eV N t G o N N O1 Ci 00 vl vl N N o 0 N N en en N O N N ¢+ en en el .Mi N N 7 'R n1 en N ,Il00 00 O O 0 O VI U` N .rr .ri .Nr .Nr .Ni N .Ni .Nr 0 Q I ��ll ��ll �nn � ��1l ;ryy N N f3 e� N N e� N U 3t er N N az N N ao N os N 0 N n N UM co cc .may co .moien ao ao .-en i aa .Mr co .�.i coti U CO N M N p U ~ Vl y y 0 0 07 0 y 0 O7 H o % z z z z z z w z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s a w w w w w 2 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q a o O O O O O O ,!4 o w a a s ua g0 w4 a 04 04 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 O 00 0 0 0 0 0 w aaaa as a 0 as O' d0' O' m el a a a a s R w :a a a :a a CA Z Z z ZZ ,Fj al al at e 3 3 0 0 3 3 6 O O 3 0 0 0 a▪ V O Q w a 0 0 a a. a a..-. 0 a. a s O 3 g g g g > J g g a 004 a a 04 o o 0 0 0 a 0 0 1111 1111 o a.151 :72a Z M 00 tn an oo 0 VI :ft, v., t O V1 vi V1 VI V vi V 0 V V V V• V V O C O O O C M O O O O O 0 0 6 6 sr sr o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o re; o 0 o 0 0 0 z C�7 E •r- d N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00, 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 10 G :27,•0' 74' e O , o h z.g g II) I A a w a w� ' U U U w S3 .0 Q r h viien en I-- 00 W m ay, O N0 b b 0��0 • U O a oNo vOD Ni r r s-,Ni v v �+N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O, vt Vl as M M Vl N ��./.fI N N U C\ N M i0 N N 00 } 00 M i Vf O N O M M 10 10 N N et 011 o b p��l M so so so O N O O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 O Z M M M M M M M Mar, M M M QI M M M M 0 a w w oa [y� Q Z W al z w CI DC z ~ waa rn oo p a O ] F H Z 4 O � � a m pwww� V o1 oq p Cu' P' o a � U A q WE d w as O O O CV OU U 5"' 12:1m u m 0, F o p aa M M m qco, m gs W as W g F .a `. Qv W a. o o4°° . wpaUU O pop NNa0 v an mi 4eNN • O v a w ag. ti % VG7 y O9 ~ W ~ ~~ u" dO' OOy yHOCr 0 W p O a a a a a s 0 w U av, t0 M M 00 M .. O Vl Vl O O h t0 O V1 h 0 O O N O 0N O ^� O N N ,0 10 h O 00 00 {N� 0, '„O' b 01 N V�1 vi ONi N Cl 'O' h O M M N N O .1 14 N ~ N N 0 O 0 o IQ o IQ Q N (� N 1� N N N coNM Z 00 000 000 00 00 a U 4* oo co r co r co r co 00 vt 0G ti ti ti ti ti H ti ti co U C . z 0 z z a C M M " ,,, w 6 ., w ,. z a z pwa,, z 0 w z 0 w .75 O 0 0 Oa O u w z U U A 41 14 o dzrli z z g 0 0 cn 0 0 U -0 0 0 o w er• 07 2 U U 0 a0 H O Q x `� d 0 z 0 3 3 0 3 a w 0 d 0 ; Agip wogs = w tt+ 0 w o r3 w o w o co a �¢ W O. O. 0 a. 07 CA P. 07 y y 3 CA 0. fn y cn 3 fn 0. w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a PPOO r 0000000 D q w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U' a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0000000 U U U U U U U A O Wz 31 1 41 41 41 31 41 4 31 31 31 31 31 4 EA 0 x00000000000000 aa aaaa 0. 50 5 5 5 a a i a C„ 0 z en en en 0 0 en 0 o a 13 * a a a a a a a a a a a eF eF eF d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ,G ,O ,O ,D ,O CD ,O ,0 ,O v1 C O O d ,O ,O ,O ,D ,O ,O ,O ,O dU C .-.7 d N N N ,I V O V N N N fV I.O. 0N O O NO N1. h NM 000 "O O O 0.. ON c;% 0 O ennO b 0 0b ,O % ,l en F. i cn N I w ,,q O N ^ Z O O O O O o o in in in N0 N N N N N O, as 0 'q O, M N N N N N N VII v01 In l ViIAIOn 000 000 U-��i (.1 Si 4 �^ 4 ^ 4 ^ 4 ^ 4 �^ 4 ^ 4 ^D ON F; 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000 00 000000 en 00 .:J \\ N u N f) N fJ N 0 N 1; N fJ N fJ Vf O yry ,O ,D ,O b b b b b b b b b U t] N W w o�"0 w m w oNo w oV'0 w o0 w m w N N Q vii V) V)VVi V) vlvii V, vTr ii vii vii Y1 vii vei viet i Cs A A O A A A A N o N N N N N N N N N N N N N U h h v1 Telh vl h �-i NCS Q, O\ O, O, O\ N N N N N N N N NNO N N N N N N N O, 0 O 0 O 0 O M M M M M M N M en M M M M M M M M M M M M h ,17. ti ti .V Ii .moi .fir .fir .V 1i V1 V1 V1 Vl vl vl V1 vl tel Yf Vl Vl O A co U z a e w UA N 88888888 E0. 1 ! g a °a d a z w a a a a a a a w 0 0 . .3 2 . u u u u v 0 5 a a a a a a a .a 0 `� d a a a a a a g g g g g g g g '� as ua m en oa as m H ociii H U U5 •U •U •U U5 0s 05 55 U . . . . . en U z U 0 O 0 0 0 o 5 5 5 0 w w w w w w w w 0 w w w w w w �' a a a a a a a y o x N �^ j p p T.L . U f) U U U fl U m O .o. 3 3 3 g '" a a a 0 0 0 0 - ° U U U 3 3 O N O OO O en 0 0 0 0 O Vt M 000000 WI 0 .nVl Vt O a' O ,O 0 O 0 O O 0 O O V' O, T 00 O1 O\ Ol til N r1 en a\ OG ,G CJ ,G 04 OG .mo .tel vi. r O M Q; el til t�1 t�1 l: G a t O, O, N N N O i . N M N 'V' N N N M N NNN en M N 0 v1 I: O O 07 ON N N N A N N N oN M '1) at''' 00co 00 0 ao ,rV� .�-i .Mi M-. .Mi w U C z 0 w IQ c4 v 4 w O 0 vwi O_ o {x� rn ¢f5 F... pw, Z Z z e/) 2 2 2 F vi W w� P 0 C4 w j w w w s�+i a PPPPPPP c/3 4.1 N w Q N N a CO O7 UI GO 47 47 4 U x w 0 P ] 0 3 a 0 P. 0 0 0 0 0 Q x w 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 a a a a a a a w a w w w w w FA3 A a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U u, 0 ° a 0 0 0 U U al o o ¢ a d a a a a a o al Z 0 a a a a a al co co co 3 a a a a .a .a a a w O. 0 a2. CO.0 P. A. n0. 00. EcoGLI . ti o0 0 afig0 p 0 0 0 0 0 zPPPPPMU UM co wco al 4.1 u a a a a 0 0 a .a a o 0 zw a " g 0. a a a aU UU U A A a a a a o xxxxxxx ` P. O. P. O. P. 5 0 0 0 Wi 6 U U c o p Qalcncorocnco 5 o w0 , F 0 0 0 0 0 b mo li a o co O o o In In w1 w1 In 0 0 0 0 In 0* vi vi o 0 0 o m o 0 o 0 0 0 at a\ Q\ Cl 0 0 0 0 0 O O N ,O ,O V, In m vt H In In In N N N N a V R a a V' h of,.0 N N N N N N �` 0 b b b b h ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O \O ,O [`1 N N N O C C G G G G C 0 �+ I. O m G G C d d Oz 0 i N d N m 't ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 O ,D ,o \o ,o ,o ,o ,o ,o so so ,O N N N N N N F 1, v g W0 0.. I w w O U O O\ O1 p1 0, a N N z a 'Z al) up U > ro m m m CO 0 v. 4 N m m o ¢� N 0 0 0 m h - .M. U 7 : a '•4 b b b b MN b en rn C .N. Z ON Ory w CO 0 N 00 ,O N 0 g .. O 6 ¢ Z Z r e v. O o N N N N N N N N N N N N U w w O b b b O ., b O N en 00 m 00 N O N en a .N-i N .h. N M M M a g g V C v, v, 00 ,D ,o ,O 10 ,D p O O O O O O en f+f e%1 en N N M en M M M en en M M en en M h M M en ti ti ti H h h h h V, V1 .I-. .h-. ti .V l- VI en Vl V1 en 0 UI r U W * co U O0 d U � 0000 " F U U U 0 0 at cn v a < < W W 0 �o aO y s� o oen en N U 0 :1 0 0 0) F O O U A W > 0 r', v, J, J, v• , - t00o 0 a t z CI o co c F Q 0 5C 0 pp3 p 3p 0o3 0 w w_ w U U z ] M g , 0. U F W F F F WW F a s a U la A z z Fa p p4 55 g q q q q �q �q w w w 7� 7� B 5 U W c+ a a c o Cwi U UUU z z o a� a� a� a� 0 0 0 0 0 0 n A Q �rw w •5. (w1 tw1 �w1 rw7 .o. W W W W W .�. pa,p .mr RI [cia� ~ .�. 04 f.Y. 3 .-' 3 3 3 3 CO al GwG rwA fwA m ti Q w k. . 0 0 0 0 0 M M ^ t!, O ti h O O N O O m V' O 0 d' N c, O 0 0 0 D\ DD U D\ n 'U ,O ,p 0 en h O O ,O M O O d' NNNN • M �-.i a .M. fV O G o a h h ,O M C d Ni N O l� .N-•i Ni fV tV N 'C N N N. en 0 00 M O\ O N en N m N M N .�-. en ^r. l� N .• W T oo N 0 O_ C O N NN 1NN- N N N O Q I, N V NJ NJ NJ N S 2 N N N N Cl Cl Cl Cl ce N ea V, ?C M M coco .co m. coco coH U a z 0 w z z �, ‘ii q 0 e W O O en O o r "�j o ..4.P ' ‘2' nz 4M W ° ° ° a w ca 0 ,Pa w ] 0 0 30NC 0 0 3 3 j a 0 ¢ 0 xi a°. R n a a 3 w� Q¢ a a f: 3 a a0 en 0 F F� a a W 0 > ] % ,2 a `� m cn a 3! �'1 d! a3 aS a q U 0 A. c z z 0 C 0E 0 0 a o 0 a U, 0 CO rx r4 o a a o o x a a a a pa 0 0 w O O 2 L a o.. > a a a a m 0 b aq a n p o o v+ .nen o 0 o 0 o o o O o o 0 y. a 0 od O O C 4 fV /V O O N <V IV tV O Z O O D\ O\ O O O OO OO 0 CN Nen e A0 E. b Z ,R g 12 .a w x 01 .oe N p O O U N xi az F. Q (� �0 O 000 W i4 ONO ONO 0 U N A h o o F, o a a a co U U v U o n o`� 00 .r. 00 5. s a 'raj N N .�. Ca .�. Ca 0000 N N N N N N 00 CR �c o o N o o o o o o 0 N Ca N q e N N N N N N O H ' V N N VJ OO a a rn a a o N N N N N ^ W b m a a .--. z 4 nen en aco r. N en S a °' a › o U E. LIU O 4 p 0 W4 g ;64a w R 4 i a Ca a W ° 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 a , .. ° 0 a 0 7a 7w 70 0 70 o co 3� 3 z a Q �. a U a a a � a s s a a 1 � E, en v a a 51..--. P: P P co 0 47 pa VI k., o 0 0 w p�, a �. `� .0. W, W. e W W o a ] o 6� od. e 0 Q0 R CO5 F a N N N N 00 O O N ON. O O 00 00 (O� o a INS, a N N 0 0 0 N .NN M U M M Go en eneO .O. f •r .-, .. .r Oao M .-- N N O O_ en 00 .r+ .r. o .r. o 1 e c V V V Q V A N N N N 2 en U 4k C- m I 00 W CO ‘13m 0t.17 M c N Z0 U z a 0 o Z .". �¢ z ,...77 z ° N O La P7 ° a ° a aa. 0 e. 3 Uo 0 a °" ° 0 o 8 E w z w...11 o p, W en U O 0 0 0 w 4 .a P i w0 a o 0 z y5i ag W Q w G0 W W a 00 CA a : a U i a. al a o. ? 0.cn 5 a od Z 0 cn p�� w z0 Lia U a scn °0 a. o a m > a4 > > Q a °U 3i A en O N z r�' M ��+ N Mf0.1 10�, 0 sr; 0 0 O b <I. V N b ,74 b '0 N .-. h [V pOpH� ^� O 0 G M O 6 C 00 P1 z a .ni �' r0.1 Ot o 0 N 0 N N 0 0— Cl N O ° 5 O b O N 00 N N b N N ^' a 0 b I F F F alA w x �' w w 1 O a Al o w 00 00 0 aW 0 ✓ U c. z CA VI t .4 t *4 m w v v `a c4 �o T0 O p :a ' '� N N p, v1 Tn Fn' .�. iT+ sa U o Q °.n° O d t� N es, "�' Q� s N N CO00 .Q, eenn Cl O col N N 'J' 00 00 Q 0 0 0. ON ON Net W 00 0 N O U .. .. vt tel 00 00 0 g v v, at 0 O 0 en 0 0 enf�, en0 mM en 10+, M p en x a R. 04 u U 4 a w &s. iiI p n cal allx pa, CiGNI U W °8 a ' 4 A 23 3 a F z "' 4 o 0 a x F t U > ca a O C C7 Wa + 0 4 ¢ p a a F PG w a C O W O .,,-- .4 v ��' qU p 5 Q' °�] 7 C7 Wa C07 0 0 $ x 3 W GOC W a q ,�� a a a 7C O N � '�' o N x CO. cwc e a PC p4 a ocyf rn M A Q w' rai, JE .. !A a F .N'. ON 0 0 0 0 0 7 R N O N O O en en 00 00 TO pQ1 O O O N N N 0 f0 00 0 O a V1 TO 4 0 v a ON ' ... b h h CT a ei b - 0 O b b O O - N b N 7 O O CO CO O O .7 el NI N N N O O_ y c Q o 2o c N en pop 00 O 00 00oaon .0. '„'-'� N U iet 00 009 P d IIo r en CA z 0 I W CD V1 CD y CA N y CA m F" W z z z z z z z z z z N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o F N N 0 a. � D. o o o o 04 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u C ° aa aa a a a a a a a a 0 Pa 3 'a a a a a a a a a P. w t 0 Pe 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO CO CO u 0 5 °� 5 55555555 5 5 w CD P P: a a F E. F. E. 0 0 0 E. 0 E. C6 C �' w U uM a a a a a a a a a ppqq a a a a a a a a a I:4 .4 a a r >. >. >n >n >n >" > a. 0 a pa n: rx c: n: a a 1:4 w 0 0 o Cy C7 DI 111111 O in"o o. `u�O. p� 0 �Z °x a. - daz w .. a a F b W Ita a a) Z en en en en VI N N v l o NON Vf of h V1yr co o en vi vi vi vi h —.co co aso eC O� 4 O O N G Cl G G G O G C/ G C O C G pz a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 S c O I b b b b b m ID IC b m N 0 .g. y � g 1 0 0 d CO. 3i . �U m '9 U O > Ni O a v R v v '4R VOI h 0 N N Uelra O M en en en en en M In en i er pp h N 00 DDen 00en 00en 00en 00en 00en 00en U 8 N r C") a z N en h h h on VVI VAI In h Pan N O N O U enQ\ T O — N en 'Ron on VI l0 rr-] N 0P N en on en orO M U M en en en M M M on on fel M enn1 M z ti VI h VI on on VI VI Vi on onon x r U 0 5 CO. $ r44 0tl ra U O a a 1 0 U 4 U m w 0 0 v FU u E x oo aa oG O x 0 ta z a `" 0 W E 0 oW 0 5 a � o Sj N M O M "' c00 O O Pn 0 ullp0p,H� p� �a0W.�co C Oji Icy vNi G 0. .'"r ."r W .o+ W .or Z W O U .or `.P. 0 .oi 9 CDg. az m - ca 3 W oU N N a o oa p� Q� m 0 0 0 �'� o Op�j .�. Or0 Oro Ni 00 M co VIII 00 Ir+1 .,-0-,er h N ti sci on b or 4 'q' '+ '+ N N N N N b M .r+ N VI Vt N N N O O_ y O r Nn N N N r N M v ID no n :: a o .+ ao a el en en a 0 en en en rn d 0o m C>7 >. >.. c›7 c�7 c>. ›.. y w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W N H z 0 0 0 0 0 0 O z U zz z zz O CC o4 CA y U U U U U 0 U w oe O O N z z U U U U U UW 0 y ,'] .7 w w N F �� :I a a ] W W U �-� �" �" �" 0 O 0 p3 O O O g i aii 5 00000 0 ? 04 8 g 0.1 W W LC .. .. .. CA CA 47 W U 0 I 8 w � � 0z0 0 a0 p '0 '0 '0 m '0 z z q W W U U U co U U O O O O O0 a a a a°G a x Em Em PS WW WU 0 ¢ W w O Q A Q. 0 F a a cen a opo 0.. a4 a d 00 $ a h o a 0a o co , o 0 m qq 00 coIn O N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 .:. 0 0 0 _ O Y .so - tit8SO Q al O M 3 ON 7n ¢ O O ro o N 0 N!---; O V V app0 Od' as a r 8O O N N h n N N n N N N .O 0 - z t g II' N n o: E 5a a 0 y[" fiX W ¢yy xo .ni0 n.i = l0M M 8 a "' w M N M U i ? .et OO :_::3 N <I' M N7 D CN 0. NN moN OOC.) ❑ W VNNaa V .i V N M V'0M VYf O O O N n n — N a a uh N N0 N N 00 NNNNNN N N r.. M M N M M M M M M h M M M m Z W moi te V1 h h h N WI ti ti ..+ ti C:1 O z u m z O w w 0 cz pC V �c $ U coco co Q cUV q .cid 'R• 'R co aa �aG E. N W�7 CCY n Cpl O d A ¢ a W Fd. p a - 0 10 d t a! 3S u U a v� p p pq w V 41 o 0 a. Wa ap Q o a a p�o�� S. S 1 ¢ ¢ U v O al o� .. n rn c M rs: N �yQ 7�+ ... O In .n. .NNi 0 c) 10 ` rW �O O ¢ O ~ O �G !. 44 Ca g O O O O 7 7 O 00 , O O h O1 .O \O O O 10 10 0 0 M '0 O o0 00 .O n n O V1 M O O en. m 00 O 4:,. \0 .O O 0 N .D M N N O N N O N M M O �O vi Vi `D O V '0 N 00 00 0 .O 00 �O N N N M M T a N M ae M n N O� .D M a N V 0 N N 7 10 N V• Q 0 O_ CA. O N IN IN N N N N N N O d0 ca a ���l ��l e e '�Ny7'� NN co pep tpp� tpp� pest N pep pep + N N r4 en N SO N IN OD 00 00 00 N 00 00 �t 00ao ao r4 ens r'.) .0�C a 0, .m-ien mi mmi emi ti .Mi U a2 w MasQz Dt V] 'N1 ,iSff4Z VI LII 3 N Z VI VI VI o a_ a E ' a w w n a. w w w o z 00 - o A w m 0 tO 2 3 a d a a w awp y yd M ' U U U P. 0 0 pvc� 41 o a q @J .! w• 0 Wa 0 0. a. U U a0 O O a O a. ? Q >. 00 m w Vi w 0 0.. U u`�7 uM Q U QWw en d W�W VI O O 00 O en a. b f Z 0 a 0 Z M el U .Mr N N g g b b O O O O O O �_ �+ M O h cal '� d z O b N N N tel b b O- H O s v h w 1 00 w g 00 r4 W O .a .x 'n U g z a VI VI m W _ 7 U o W in U �::CCCOjyyy \� '^ �`] N N N �n} N N 0C1 M _ tltl N ✓ N N O 00 O Vi U O d 0 0 N d' un N O U O M M ti .�. b a N Z a M M M M Zi M N NIn DI NGIN tIN Icl MGI M a U z 5 z Z E. 8 U S 2 � a C U E E E ., a F� zW! a � w f" dF E a0I.FU a W p > a x W U O0 00sy F w w CO ow w w A w a wa d Qz w a o E. _ U U W c o w U W Ca k6 b o .. E 0 0 o q o . as U U N Q o O N tiP. .ti .. W .ti N 3 00 rwn 2 LYi ❑❑ ti v, W oo a s O O 0 0 N N V O O r N ^, ^� O a N r Q\ ON G C a d' •: •: r r V fV N co 00 00 00 C¢O M M r r N N en M� N N WItel kn V' 7' 0 O_ V] O N N N N N N N N N r Oa °' 0 ...• 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 • (3 N N » !? N N N t3 N pNp en pVi M M M�M OMrp vUf ,y ODco 00 0�0 0�0 00 co 00 0000 Vo H. rn ti 0 H - ti ti en H d 00 00 00 00 z wwwMI y ww w Oa 8 011 411 ozzz zu zzzz ° "off L- 5UM f a o 0 w w w , o 040000 p o 0 0 0 a s CO 0 VA 010, 010, �' ° M a i o _ 5 a a o 0 0 0 az a a a a ` 5 5 ° o Q ' a Q Q Q Q o o o a E g � o � o 4 R 2 z a fm U 3 3 3 'vi f� A .QR 8 a �i a A A p4 iii F �¢ ¢ d! Q d a¢ Q �t aJ dS �l @1 a pa. a. a�.+ as pa. a tid p y a a a a s ur ur a c o 4 4 w 4 4 4 4 414 4 .4 4 41 w a� w `[ w .11 4 4 4 = o -a co m rn a m u, rn m .3 a .pa. a cn cn w w w P. U U LO O ° W a - a a ? a a aCO GO t2. . a °� a s a"a. a s A 0. a > ° C7 C7 C7 CC7 C7 C7 C7 �J t U A M cn cn 4 . 00 � CD C 4 4 4 4 4 4 m C C 00 U U a w w x g A a: a4 04 a4 a: A A A A A A D o4 x 04 04 U) o o w w o 0 m o 0 0 0 o as ra m oa m w o 0 0 0 0 t a a 0 z O O O o On O O O O O O O O O pp O pp pp pp O O O O O lD l0 IR O N h C• Vl tel H Vl C' C' N N C• Vl h CM Vt N p 1 eF �n N V1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N �n N N NCO N o �p �O '4'. 6O so, 'O 'O SO 'O VC VO SO so, 5O 'O 5O 'O VO 'O so. SO 'O 50 VO J G .+ O O l0 r C Ni N Ni -• Ni (NI 0 0 N N tV fV 0 0 Vi O .M.. lD -. l0 l0 O N -. O O 0 VI O N O O O O VI Z 0 8 Q o 0 o O v O -. In h Vl o Vl O -. -. tel In vt Vl O -. -. O N 50 SO N SO M SO VD SO N N N N SO l0 SO SO O >l y Q z A ,,- O. O. ..moi 1 N F w .i a U .' .0 eoV M /-���` en m m 0 N w OCt M o a vrl N {,, N Ol Yui V0i U g , `\\ .9 �D 9 N , N M tris, O Y�l vel O ��n Vel vel N M Vel N ,`,y M b V O r p� O N N O C' C' 0 0 '4'' O o O C' O O N C' O N N O O M to 3 N v v CV 4 a4 44 a4 4 m a4 a4 a4 4 a4 a4 v a4 a4 m lD a4 4 o 0 r Z .N. 00 a 00 a+ O O N M 7 VI SO N CO SO N CO a 00 M M C' C' -N. Q M b N N N N N h N N N N 00 00 00 00 N N N N Z° N N N O a O O O O O O O O O O O O o M M M M M en M M M M M M M M M m M M M M M M M M m Q A ti .V 1. -Yl. .V 1. _, Vl Vl Vl Yl Yl Vl Vl Vl Vl Yl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl V1 Vl Vl I '^777jjj Z z 1:4 Q * Ii o - o a w o o w 0 °� ` 0 o 0 H w U 41 0 3 0 o w Q oo a s oaa W C vFi ai > z 0 O O a mz o a s x a �rzQ� w a a� c�i, c�i, Z o Q ] W — 0 Q O x p, q z 0 o4 j a O p a a M M d 0 o Q O 0 d ` 0 C7 7 5 V a u� aa4 Aw f� Oa. w Q [` :a a F a4 g g g 0 41 ��a > Q a ° fi,° o �i [ Raj Rj z o z pa A a 1. Z z z w �Z a z j w U °' 01 d g M D• W ¢ a. O a4 4 a r/J Cn V� �i C N 41 A NNa. � a N Q O a 9O O .. N 0 W .Nr rl so z w M O Q Q 4 ati cn Q ��.-rye ipC, U a „ z W .7 U e q W a W k X � � z a. 00 . 0CcaD � F0 � - aUU � � o O o o O In o o 00 lO l0 00 g g g 4 & e o 8 'A g O . O O 0a% 00)_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0. rn h h a? h h G O M N h 0 .I. Vl Vl M l`N C' M a1 00 .I. .moi a• a1 N 000 CT; Cr; Vl Vl gM M N N N oo N M ^ l0 M M N Vl M M Q .-r .--i .,. N l0 50 O O_ �Isv v g C o 4. 4. o m i Eel ill 44 en CA CA z W W az fx1 W M .21 wM al iz z zz ° z 5 z ° ° ° w 0 wwao uo z z vvo E. a ow PPagg gv, ow 0 >N ! a s a aa w w m W W„ W a m OO E. O a U U o U U O O w l a 0 2 ¢ w °0 �i o o 1 0 0 ma n° w ao w w a w a o as °� a d d 0 w Fe-...) A w 3 M w w M M M rn a s m v w CO w cea en mi ccnn sn dy fj 64 w cn p�' 5 ' F E L �' y F ..1'1' ° �" o o Q c 0 0 ch 03 33 v! , w a! a3 a N 3! 7, u41 F F 0 w' •. o • 00 rn rn 00 00 00 rn `� .a ..1 00 .a 00 O O uJ U w w '� NN u° pa. w m pa,. a pa. a s a. N a s p A wq a w a w na. a s 0.. a a P-,' a aa. `n cn w a s 0 A � � � � � � � � � a � � c� 0 � � t � � >. cn cn cn cn m u, v, w z m m 0 0 w w s¢ g xoL "4 " a go4aGa4a. clunc4zo '4 4/ o R w a. a 5 a 5 w 5 S E. S O O O O O w m O O O w m > m O F m 0 m i a a ul '"00 hO0OOOONo Mp ,t5,, NnpOh Vv1 VO R Vi Vi Vi O O M 0 en 0 N b b b b m b 01 es1 b m m b .moi b h N b b V o 00 o N N O N O o .vi tV O 0 0 •0 O O N O 0 M 0 O O .tea h 0 O O\ 0 h 0 'C l0 iD 'C VD b N O O N O O 0 Z Cal ¢ •,,-; o .n .n o .n O -. • .n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO N N N b b iD b N N I b F. T cn 0 s d a w X Q 0 N fn a5 O vei vi O VVI 0Ce TT 00SO N VI t 00 en Q, 0 N V U . e'� eO000 . hsN � a W G 00 0 00 ^'� O N N vrtl U 0ONN fl Up0O O O r� moE W emo4 .4 .moi b 4 N 7 00 el OO O 0 0 U VI VI O\ N en V' VI 00 N N m st an ti O 'C 'C N M O N M b N N V' l� N N N 0 0 O h 7 00 OI en M .Ni N N N N N N N N N N O O O • N N z m M M M M en M en en en M en h N N M M en M !o'n' r Z en m h ✓l Vl Vl VI 0 0 Vl Vl VI VI 0 0 0 h ^ (n — F z o w 1.4 M ww ❑ qz a en 3 x a4 v' ¢ q en w z�z w 0 d g �j a 0 z d 0' w w w Ca z W O C7 U W m rk R. .4 W U 33 O F m x1 a °� W W �" pa o V F aC W0 a n- a' "O, n . . aE 4' a' W a p." pw w w ] a U m a u`q� k`qq z w a, E. w d d U p W U U Q O j O E R O x PSC .4 U w a Q A n ¢a Q g R Q -1 r w p W a U a o a d o M m m O R Ql O a. 00 0 r/Fj m e d a x z " U at O a O ° o a� o N d $ c a w ° ° ww ° w w °a a - a v'a .. > o8 u 3 .2 d d- w m Ow P o E a A A. 00 010 Ce 00 m a 0 Vii C' 00 Vt V1 00 00 O\ N CO N CO N Vl 0o 00 en M VI )O tl V1 O\ O\ 01 01 Q1 ON O1 h 1� VI V O l� N O O O l� t••• V '3 d' V' 01 et M pi Qi lh M O� l 'cl' 01 m M oo .• .r tt a 10 VI ' I� O V N m N N N Vl )O N N oho M 00 - 19 00 M en •cr. NN N 0 N 4 O O_ v] 6N N N N N N Q 2 N N N N N gn 00 U °a$ m 00 0000 m h 1H In .M.. .mr ..T. .Mi d cn z 0 •w 00 m o en N } 0 CF 5 cn CA Z z z Z a } N 0 0 0 0 �' o t t • a. .g a o41 o �_ 0 3 3 0 °' 0 g g 1 A x 4 a a44 o Ca CO CO U U U zz01 W 11cn C w w 30 w w C o d Wa °�a as F ta 1 U O O U O ¢ W IW a 41 W U en i g en en z o M 1 O en Vl O O O O O— O N PI vel ^ ^ No No No No No Z Ni S 74 ni co .4E < 0 0 0 0 et o N oen a m S; O C7 g O .2 SO :2 50 50 ON H a, 0 ' v h z .g g oe w 00 00 w 0 A ,.L4� N 0 fl CT T o0 N .M-i .Mi V U N z M co co en m on 00 b .N, b rte, rc N cp O NI 3 O O 0 m en 00 000 U U V N 00 W O �I a fl 44 VI N N [� Q1 w h ti h h W N 00 00 O U en N ti 00 01 M 50 E O N N O N M M N N N el M M M M en ztel ‘el tn U R o o ww U 0 o U ea ¢• U U 4 . O z z w a zP:1 I oCO a W 3 a a z m W x x , q (77 d o W F c� 30 � a 0 X o u � o a s a s � ° & P° ' wF. III a 4 r-7 b '1 N 0 0 N '-'� a N v"', O 3 P. O O O h N b M O O O\ 01 7 V en O 000 m we } O O O N V co 0, vl {vet C '�T Q 00 00 000 00 01 ^ -6 O O Os Qi VD b m N ~ aq N N 00 00 aT N 01 N .N-. O O_ 02 `A moi' eC o�' C oi� Q Q N N N N co N N co en ne en M 1 V5 U 4k a 00 00 co co co co h G��'' .0. H .0. 0 .0. .0. .0. .0°. 0. U m z 0 0 00 en Ica M Mi cn 5 5 5 W W [}r 0 0 N VI V z a z o Z c � cn 6 zw 0 w o a 0 0 0 x 0 w Fli a �¢ w w a 0a. ' 0 3 g o w x ca a La H 1N u 0 ca 3 a a 0 La ° z z H F 0 o E o d W d v v yd a 1 a: VI y F o a w (n v� ��«xy7 ��'zc� 31 21 �I 03 O • U ] ] W kj u p� t cn w a Ap 03 �l W W a paa... :47 a 5 a. f i °a z oo o a a w x rn ad O ,wj �a z F w w 0 La La a a a 0 VI 2 :-..- 0 0 z _ h o 01 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 o 01 O N 00 N h 01 N N N h N O O 1 S 1 810 N U C fV /V fV C C N O (V tV O C O b G Vl .nh O O O O O Z 0 C d o o O O O O N b b NN 00 b H 0 o t a a w Si• ° ' N N on en ✓ U ..-i O 0 [x7 0 0 000 000 �7 .�-� N .�-i N ^' on VI m "'� \ •N N LF"^J' N lC�"^/� N N M M c�,y M Cryo 'O 'O N U g N co O O O N M N ¢ N ¢ N ¢ O b ^' N G7 N L7 N N N 00 00 00 e 0 U 00 O N N .0-. Cl O\ O. 01 .0 N 01 .N. N N N "" N tel N 01 ^ ^ O O M M M M M M M M en M M en Z - 01 en - en - - en e en 8 Ca U 4 a a 0 t X Z eonG 000 c oxpw w rn m¢ ¢0 Fa O w U U a a 0 0 tna Oz pO a Wy U F o F a aa F 0W VU Z Z o a o � z O 0 0 U G •o ° O � o N °n�. o U oil d d d r � .. o 6. o e . .. . N :-4, 74 N O O 00 N 4\ O O\ .O N .O CI Cl N O O 0 0 m o o en o �O O N N V, .O .0 0 p eri N N tot V1 Wi VI ni 04: co 00 01 CI O • O FA 5 NN N h N N N N o IQ M M f3 N N O N fM� V�1 Vim! �pq�fl ppm .00 b V pbp 0 it co M en M en M M M 00 d t N O x Go Q a. N V � w V1 V1 O =' W CO) m a U w W Q �2 z z z z w U .n- W ° ° O O `n w W W a w w ° a a x w g 0 0 0 0 al O ;, o o x 3 x x o a a °z ¢ a Da 3 a cn m m m 3 3 a. U 0• w = 5 ° m . a a x c o en U a 0 a .a "ppa.., N Z p0 ap.., 61 z ¢° a a U U ? y o. a y O ° 0 47 47 U U x 0 I MI Uen V -e4 04 a rx > > O cn a. a i A P y o en 0 Z M M _ O O • on O O— —O M M no M O ye yr en en 50 so fV G G C G co N SO SO M fV N /V tV vi Z• 0 0 N a'' ,, O O N N 0 0 0Oi VI O O C o 50 So in 4 so 50 4n a 0 AY v h I F F i '' o w as m I w• 4 x N h b b SO z o m 0 - = a an V O . .. ch p �^ N 50 50 "MV' �1 `p ce U g a h m v+ 0 o ye N °° p a 3 $ a 0 0 N N N N 7 VI y N n VO, m., 0 0 O a m N Vl O O N SO V1 en o ti O O o N N N en Z M 5 M M M M M M M M M M G M M Z - - - - 0 a8 a 2 I °z g a v7 W R U G� g I „,. i H en m E G g x w N d F3 W a 4, . ,.„ Z a 0 u ,.., al e x ..., a -51' 3 gxq gx g : <4 Nab a � � a � W o e w M' M N .a °: a s o a a M 9 0 .N.. x va O M O p 2 2 .. a n PP; q O O O O7 O M H F. c 3 I F. � uzi o a c M en O O -+ .-. O\ O\ en en .M. .M+ b Vl an co O N n 50 pppp 0) 0) N N (NN VNt 0 O NN n aN o0 oe O O co m VI 0 or o M M .NO. 0 T T v 7 N N N n n o 11 O 00 M [: vai O O_ y I.- .nN. .n.o .n.o .n.o .n.o ..I o O O O O O p l i �f Q �Q �Q O O O o Q t3 N l� f� N t� N 5 5 5 5 en sea 3 to Ye SO co va en Ye o A en w 0 a 0 Sn 0 U co co co z u z z en z z a 0 p3 03 F8 PPPP w a " PP 9 aaaaaZZya0 j 0 a cz itl4.1 O O O O wvO O O O O O O O O O O O a 0 O as Co s , a Co °z a s A a a a a a a. 44 o rn a .a en en en a S O '6 U a. 0 G O aa. of Z c7 a s a $ a A O 04 04 04 a a r' o U P3 CA as OO O a sU U U b no z Sn en z0 0 0 o Vi vi vi vi 0 0 0 0 tri tri 0 0 o h h O O O O M n n n 0 O M M 0 0 o a un VI o o 0 o 8 o en ,vi o 0 o Ni o 0 z E < o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 I-: o 0 O rn o 8 .8 '0 8 b 8 e A al Sn a a u ¢ I a���yN w o d , 0 M 2 N F. en d a V r 7 '� 0 z n �n M H w .N. N a 0 0 0 ci • M 0 8 0O [��]I to 0 U 0 a M M M M N N N O O O O U cn ern M M 8 M M M l�1 M fM�1 U cn M z - - - - - Cr. 9 9 9 9 9 Sn - a a a w w U pa IAI o O U 30 w a z w M S cwa a• r.4 10 O 4 p S g p a z� Nt`E S viii ¢ U w c x 0 1 154"pw pp�� w dvn, OU O co y °U i fr4 U 16 ¢ W W W w p C7 �¢ U� 0.1 aG 0�0 w o PC C4 w Q w F a 6 p� U C n M M p'7, O eq ¢ eD O �"� a m MI 0 eon O O O O a e A v N j a i g c 0 0 04 04 a o m w w w w 5- m ., a s .. u. w ., aMC s w P MI a wa7 wro 2 N "4 4 '4 .a U m es 10 h O 0 O N V' 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 .a ^ m n 0 N N p O N O O O N M e�f 0 O O O O O M (no Sn N a 0n on Sn O� 7 ^ 0 N ^ Q\ M. .M. O O N N 'cf Sn vi Vi N 05 Sn Vi O M M 0 a h h .Mr O V' N N M co ems+ n d0 Sn VI v1 N M Sn M M vs a N N N M l� Q ti • h Vi M Sn 0 O_ en O n n n .n. n o O O 0 0 Q I O O O O O O O O O N A N g 5' eV N N iS P n N 00 00pNp N CO coo pNpp poop I.coco ;�U 00 M en co en teen M ti 9ca cc .Mr Q d 0) z 0 tn w ,w 00 00 ry a0 W O O 00 O O O yy yz yz CO U W w y5 5 00 00 00 a555P �a o o 5 5 o a 0 0 0 0 0 a A co 3 a s o 0 0 044 �y x I d d d d d 0 W 0 ° a 0 0 d Co 0 d 0 A a a a a a z w v, 3 u 00 cn a a a a w e 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO w 0 0 3 3 E Z Z 7xy O Z O z z z z z z > > O O .e° a 0 0 0 3 al 0 0 O 0 O O Q CO CO O O CO C4 CA U c 0 0 U U U U U ^ QAi U AG @l @I ai @i .1 al Ft. a a az >^ G m 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O w m v, O O A OO m a a a 'gni 0 t i 2 , h h o 0 00 00 0 0 vi vi vi vi vi �? co. g+ 0 0 0 0 0 o 4-, sr sr sr sr TIN C. C. C. 0 0 y a 4-4 U C C C G O ' fV O N tV CM pi Oi CN O G G O C 0Z Cal E 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 o N 0 oa 0 -: 0 m o o 0 0 o 6 0 CO Co 'o CO CO N m CO CO CO rn CO CO CO :o iO CO O ', •o m a w w $8 / I MN M OC O >O" 0 d ti z0 0 0 v0i V ars0 k" N N N N N N N N 00 04 0: N E. p V G > 00 00 00 00 00 N 0 a, O, 0 0 ON a+ O O co . co U v, v, vi h 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 n 00 00 00 00 U O CO O 0 0 VO NO NO CO CO '0 `O 0 O pi 0 0 pi 00 U 00 00 00 00 00 0 a a a v v v v O O O O O O to C) V1 VI VI Vl z z 00 00 en 0 O N N N N N N N N N N N N u i00 O\ 0 N CO N 'O CO CO 'O 0 0 0 0 0 M 7 00 0) CM N N M r C` T O h M N N v v v v v M a en a v c en vn v v v 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Z a C. h V1 V1 VI V1 h h h h V1 h V1 .h., - H ti .�. ti oa o4 w o 4 w O 000 p" w w U 4 4 e 4 zz z d z WU 4 0 0 am at i 4 0 0 0 0 C7 C7 tsi oz z 41 0 00 o o o o o o o 10 0 0 w F z O 5 u u ' ] ] �a �a� X54]] a Q 41444/ al W N m a E u @ al U < W W W w I` o o U W [G 0.'i P4 O �¢ w : 4 4 o g O1. E, O .. W 0 3 F) S O O o O cool w E, w 0 .M. o y� y� co) •a = U a .o. 07 W CI in P4 ." w .0i W W W W .0i a ti a .. w wwww ' ' w w (� . awi . . I b N N N ^ N r U M O\ M M N O\ 'NC.' N N N M en M I O\ 00 N N 0G 6 oo of 4\ N M O� fel f�1 M 00 .N. M r O O O N h h O M N V' .M. M N M N V N N N CrN O ,n N O b 0 M en 00 .M. h 'cY et.-. N 'S M CO N N 00 }CO \O M. D\ O O_ 0 0 \ N i Q O O\ O O O O fe4 N N fV N 5 m 000e 2 00 CO 00 U it X 00 00 00 00 00 a A en H en ti - H z w 0 (6 aa a M1�` qen en en N — z 0 W z U Z 0 U 0 U Z 0 0 :° a. w ow Pw a F a M F .:4 ,P , E 'l 111. N 0 000 w a 5 rn 20 6 0 0 0 a� a a 5 w 5 ? 5 WW d 5 ° 0 3 3 3 aai 0 ai 0 vi �7 124 1 vi q , a fwia 0 3544 A 0C 0 A 0 a .' M OC a Z a O Z a ,c, a0 a0 a 0 z° a nd. w WI CCa. FFU, w 0 a. ai M U, UU,, U, w Z U WWv, 00 C.0 U, C0 v� v� v� W W W W o iq w w w 5 m .. Q v, v, U vi rn m en U a' z A en E E U 0 0 0 0 in' FA cil M 1 0 0 VM kM �y1 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 00 W w w w a. z. a. a. b ' 0 m 0 z _ O aa a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N h50 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O g 50 50 3 1g g 0 g 0 en ,a e � en d e r 1 1 3 3 0 U IV o .+vovl C aV C aV C N so o enN O c.4 N N O ,D si co co s ID 0 05 ID N 0 M CS N N N 0 p C7 o N ¢ 50 00 o en 0 IF 0 A, v h g a of w .5� CO .ti p, O w g x U ¢w w 0 . ?a A N 00 00 UJ ''rOZ MM NNNNN CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO 00 OD CO 00 CO � am U m N N N MY G Oren en en en en en en M M M en en M NNNNNNNNNNNNNN <Y O, ", M �-, M ^ N5 M ''4'' O o O O a O O O O O S 0 O O O o O NV 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 5 " 4 , U r . . r r O, O\ a a O o 0 0 O et N en N •^ N ,O 00 00 00 00 O\ O, O> at O, O, O, O, a\ N N N O N f <F ZM M M en M M M CO en en en M en en en M enen enM M Z ti en en IX .�-i .moi ti h h .lMl en h en en tel en en en en en V1 en rn h - - en Ft A W F 0 0 �ae� 0 h z 0 0 CA U z o LI i EON 1 dg 0 i Z 0 O 0 coi t d N .. w a a a a a a a a rd a s -a a 0 0 uM uM 0 0 0 � E E E E E E E E E E PH v P 4 cn 1 g w w w w ud w w uaa al w w d w 1 A q d 0 w u p� ca v v A w Q :° uM w M M M M w vMM. M M M 0 0 z 0 Al A M Q A A A A A A A !] A A A A a 0.1 w y m p ass r m ,o 0 ,o ,o ,o ,o w ,0 .o ,o ,o 'a 0 r O r. P. .. x F U U U O O O O O w w w w 1.4 U Wg Waw cn Z Z w v 0 0 0 0 Z z Z Z Z A A A A 0 4 0000 0�0 500 M O O O N M N ONO ,O n N a 21: h ^t V "N�,' pm,, a g 50 50 50 VI O N N G. R N h T en 01 h ,O N .M-. vo - m VM' 7 O, 0000 coM NN N 00 M ,O O, N 00 00 M O, O N N N Vl 00 OS OO N N N N N vi N O O U, 0 F Nr s1 ,Q 0 rl O N A O O O O O O N N N N N N m F. a ON. enW h m, A F. .�M-. ti en en H U CA U 44 o w 00 00 a M W N .. Z cn V• 0 U m Vl kb M CA a x ' 0 z z U y z o 0 O en O U W a. m 0 a ayP P U WNL- O W 4 ' z GU U o a o o Q a o a w d o 0 1 n 0 -a 0 0 ° ] ] a�qqEw a a O a. aaa 00 0 w 0 m q u a s w w In rn fg a a. en eaki w aki en .23 en c4 F _m a _) a en u`� ZO a Ca w a Z a a ° �1 a ..1 M ° as 0 ° Cd) z 0 en Z 0 0 La o ca ca ca W w z a. 0 z O U M0 aa. 0 0 0 1- W o. F am 0 F b en 13 y cn O o h Z O '-. O O O O O O O - 0 ^ 0 0 tel O N N N rV N '/rl 'A N v VI. U '0 '0 m b b b CO S CO CC CO U O O O O ^' ^' h M -. O C N C C 0 - _ .r-. �' o— O O— O 00 Cl) O O 00 00 0 N O O_ O N N N Q N b b F AT cn Q •a tEl w a 0 xi � `� `� E � � U o rg xi C z (,) N U N U N U N („1 N U U M vr. O O ko o a h e v v C _ U U ° = a. aM w a�' a. M w M O. aM 3 .- a M en U -. N en 'n rn < co o o m v v a r vl vl tri tri O O O F F U r m N Z N M o <1. e} et <} vl vl h M N M O O O M M M M M M M M M M M M M Z - - 0 O al y`, O V U = U O E of rxn 0 E a U pW w w C 0 d O O Q Vz1 ,j t�Pli -1 i i U p WW U Et O O O Z o ' r. O U 1 F u¢W; F F E. 0 0 0N 0N NN OF ¢ F a e o h U § '� �c4 U > W�" .7 {{t��� I?�! F p OO�i a U m VI au s0 en r F00 U U U M F N O h N a4 ao o . e � o OG o ate. ate. o O .. - - - - a. a. a, w a at a0. a0. 0 0 O 0 O O 0 h h 0 0 O O l0 00 ar N r r r m0 0 o r m v o 0 0 o v; v v? m o N o N r en ^a o: N h vi h h to 00 Cl) Nup N lO a v en enr N O O_ al 6 ti NN vu rN rr r r vu Nr Q O O O O O O O N N a a a a a M 7 anco '0cu N 00 Ol co co co oo a co OS vl 0 H ti nMi ti ti :2d CO cv U z O O ^ W q q r 0 0 0 u� o3 z z 0 0 0 a o o 0 0 g g g D. •a O a w 44 aa.. CW. CW. w O O O O a. a. �¢ rn O O O a s cG 3 U a q a! ae a. °' 3 ] °a ° x a z5 000 aaa a a 4 3 0 a a a Co�¢ a a a a as a 7� O y a. a Ca A a a. C a s G cn0 O O O w U W cn on O O O d U a0a O at > O O t no a 0 w ZO o M .. h O 0 0 0 v0 OO g ol.•r O O O MO O O 7L` 0 g Nb .�. .�. .ai esi N ..M-i b b .ar tea tea M fV h C C C f11 Q� O fV G O O O O Z 2 h O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O 10 10 10 10 10 01 10 10 10 10 b >, Vo E:..., 0 t z g a x F U w 13 O 0 b 0 U U o N 0 �a' . t` U .�. U f`OV z O m W b Vt O ,n Vt Q 10 o9 m m Co U U 4 h N e} N Oto N1 OM1 Y' V :ft 7 d' .r co� Vp N lCJ p x ^OV .MNa r r 0000 V , .�-� 00 z Co N N N 0 U •--� O N N eF 7 N N N Nf 01 VI 10 h 00 00 00 N N 0 00 00 0\ 01 00 N N N O N N M 5 h N N M N N M U V V V 7+ yMj h An ti ti An el en en en en M N Ars An en en pq An An M M An el A .. .. a a w a z 0 U a0• U a4 g 3 O Coal a aa 3 U U W w U g �"a F cn Co d O U a O Ca i s U W ca a Q CoUy W U W Q a Co A. F ,y M ,t", p o4 kZy w Co 7N Oa d w U a L1 CC 3 5 �yy7 kC t M a. 1:4 a4Li4 of 04 0 co 6 o MF ti w w w r 4 i.4 N en oo 0 7. N a, N ea' P y V) P P P •a, o o a UUj 3 a oG O o N a S SO WU O O O z 41 3 7i'., 47 awi 4.1 O ro wm CO 0 0 N N OO O O O O 0 0: a, a O 01 Oo V1 O O ,e1r Vl t WI N. O Vl O 00 00 O CF et O O1 V1 gq4 7 N N .Ma VI O1 C 4 4 00 a 00 l� l- C�1 f+1 00 00 C h M 0 N N CO 00 ra ra 00 N N M 4 N N M V CO V1 M CO 00 10 I� N V1 V1 ti 4 et et M to V' V1 N N O O Co N N N r N N N N N U 0 0 O O O O O O O O `1 a O O O O O O © ti O 1Na� fz.1V N e�• t� N N N 'N t�` 4t a a pC 0en a In a so a a aoa U., U00 co O1 00 00 00 00 00 00 H H H H �M•1 H H H a�•I d 00 0 M N N N m m (Ammo m m rn m m m m m m fn m m m o m rn rn m m rn m zz z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z li OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO w0 PPPPPPPPPPPPP P PP P PPP w 41 °V w v w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w a a 7 O O a a a.0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 enW x a w x x x x x a g w w x w x x x w x x w x x x x x x a a o o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o a 000000000000000000 O 0 ` 0000000000000000000000000 w a s .-in a a a :a a a a a :a a a a a ,-1 ,-_-1 a a a a .a :a a a 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O N . "a ca 'a ca 8 z8 z8 z� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •y a 0,10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a . u00 w a a a a .a a .a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -a I ❑ ❑ ,j a a a a a a a a a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑m U 04 >% >. >. >. >. >. J1. >% >L >. >. >L a en A a x 0 04 x 04 04 a a x w a w a 04 d a x 0: 04 a x a 04 04 a s O 0 il 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g' 1 m 70i O O vl vl vl vl vl H N h vl O O O O O O 0 . O O O O O O O O pp 0vl O h h vi vl vl vl v1 vi vi vi vi vi vi Vi Vi h h vi v1 h vl Vi tri h h O O Vl Dom O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �O0 et ti b eF eF R R V et eel. el- R V V' <t et V' el. et <f ' of R a 7 7 V of NN 0 O OO O O C G O O O O O G O O O O O O O O G O G O O6 O ^ OZ E N Q 0 0 c O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 O l0 l0 b to ' b b b ,0 b b b ,C3 s.0 '0 b ,0 ,o b b b VD ,0 SO ,0 b b F a (n O v w g a O 0 0 en z :0 U [OV i lOO pN 0000 00 000 OMO ONO 000 00 N N N l.0 b b � ' 1 � N M en "A M Ail M M O1 ✓ 0 V ^�^ <1 v Ol .My �My M{ M aM aM �yM. M tN�f M Ma M M tM+1 M yM �M{ M 0�0 .0�y0 O�0 0�0 00 OO 0y0. OO U ' N NP b en en v, en en en en en en en en en en en lO b en en en en en en en en N N N N en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en M O a }et p��7 �Q}. O O C.) 'C voi M eY qet a V' a 7 a V 4 4 V' a' 4d4' '7 4 t V V' e• C a' 'W a d' 41 Z 4 M M M en M en en en M en en en en M en en en en en en M en en en en en en M M H ^ .moi .moi en en en en vs we en en en en en vl en en vl en en en vl en en we en en vl of ❑ W 0 O U U o 4 a a ; 08 5 a 1 4 a Qa' z aaq a m w > W w � www d w 'CO 0 'CO w GLI . ti 5 �` m O 0 0 0 O o o "' o o O W O Wtiww ° wP2wP uw ; w � wrpw❑ ooa ppw pw 4 9a 2 M 2 u O 9a u u 2 ' 2a >4 9a a '7a 2 ' 5 2 U u w 2 a co15 0 0 v 3 0 0 a � O p, rs, 0 O ❑ 0 a w 0 . 6 0 p, a O l;, 0 0 s0 c " WW VgAgg .c.,1g 5) 66 o16616 h O 01 en en '.0 vt e 0n Ol 00 e-+ O " 00 '0 M N N N M en en N l0 M 0 0 0 lD 00 Ol M el' O N 01 V0 VI 01 ,es vt CO. N V N CO tri 0 N T V 'O O N M M O O O C .4 1:-: eY O e-, 01 V' ^i " b tV 00 vl vl vl N eY 4 M O G vl N et 0 00 06 O of N N t0 0 vl vt , VI M N M 0 a 0 0 N 01 0 N N ,0 0N <t 00 0 IN N aq M M O 01 41 .. .4- O1 eN ey M M M N '0 N 'O 01 O1 M �O M. M N en M N ^ N EQ m (J � H ami O O Q O O` O O NN Ky 00 0\ O " 00 m 00 00 UV H HM-1 " V 00 z 00 P 5 cl el w o o O O O z o W CA MI w z oo zo zo 0 0 (04 z� ZZ o 0, a pW, L) Wx W x W x �C x co N , W z F b W�., " N F c4 F F F 0 cry' O P - a q . F p, ',"21 0 0 zz2 o o z0 z .a OU d o - 0 aa. U 3 o a px� W v� x . ri 00 CA CA i 3 a t"z a� 3 0 0 PI U U P-1 U W 117 cn rn W 04 04 04 04 E E A W W W W S ..g e a a: w a: a: a: 4.1 4rn4 4 4cn .11 cul) CO) rfl CA 0t1 M o 0 2 4 4 4 4 400000 v, a O a a a rn o oA A A A a ¢ ui P. a a 0 a m is Fa 41 al c4 aa. A aa.. r. A A A a a. 4) w d o ,c 0 a 0 en o 0 z Vl Vl V' Vl Vl V1 N �. N N N d' 0 0 ^ 0 O} O O a 0 .y0. 0 N N N 0 8 N O (V e N ni C O G G C C O O vi N N a 6 1 0 d N ON O 0 pp O ONM �f Vo 00 t1 p O a po N N - N N r 0 0O OV O O v0 s "' tg c4 I ' U O .0 C4 as I,4 w, U 0 z rn A o } h � rn o (.7 O V a • r o0 m N W N N �Oy N t��1 el ^ 00 N .r. O 0 0 O\ 0 M NNNNNN 00 O M O U M M M M M M N '0' V V' Co N H O M O U N N N N N N 0 v VI '0 '0N N d' N ON 00 'a N N N N N N 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 M N CA N N o M M M M M M M N V1 N H N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M .Z h h V1 V1 V1 h tel h h tel V1 h ti V1-. - Q vh F U U U a CO: a0.1 da 4 t pp x C) F O ~¢ W , 33 a i o o (2 R 1 a g x37 W F Uz ¢ ¢ ¢ d o o o �" o a o 1 co p 0. U y r4 ea 0 ¢ ¢ ¢ co '"t Q et O ‘*-9 p .y z o .0 o w W a a d �,, ^�' z z z z a 5, z p U 5.. ." ca d ."r Uul . CA or , .'"+ .er cn a 'O .D ON 00 00 00 V' 0 0 0 0 M 50 O O 0' 'O 'D 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N M N N N N 0 O 0' 0 0 00 R 0 0 00 00 0 0 O N N c'i 00 O M l� 0 0 N vi 50 00 O N N N N T g 0 O vs O N M N 0 .a .a 00 0 N 00 N 00 0 0 N N 0 0 0 00 ap NO 00 M ON N N N N N 7 'U N N O1 N N vi d 7 Ni N 0 O_ 00 V N N .NN NN N NN NN N 0 § i Q O O O O O O O O N 3 e3 e3 t1' 3 e3 5 !-� N M V Vl 'a N 00 0 YY.. 0a0 0000 en 00 0000 0000 0000 0000 en 000 en en en en enAvs a z 0 .0 NpZ 2 L w a. O zza N N 0 0 z 0 O O W „.., U cn RI g g �z�++ a COMCa 8 F' g w _� > f z P. °o a s 8 xycn as c4Q g x x COa v0, vOi vOi U U a ci)0 O 3 Z a0. 3 cn : CO Uz U Uz CO �Fix i M CAW 1 C 6 zd 6 pad w U U U w o A ' .wa .. w w pqrn le U a O a k' a a CO k 0 a U 0 cki a! 21 0.1 21 F F 03 t oZ [a 00 0 0w m c7 w w w w w w w ugi u00 00 �¢ Q cn ¢cn Q cn ¢ ¢en U QQ w w w a. ag t m :0- a y a z 0} 0 o 0 m - 50 0 0 0 p 3 3 3 3 N N a a a a a a b b b V M t`1 lV P1 a G 'cl' fV lV eq tV M 0 pC C lV tV z G .�+ �' O X0+1 101 M N O N M V Ii, N 0 C' O VO1o C O 2p 2p 2p as as so so so so l� �p FF- b h z t g a P a 1 m in • g CO ro m 6 6 O V p N N N N Nler- •. ,q o ' oa oa Oa oa 0a oa N b N b N (7 N b N (7 • ^ el 'n CJ 0 0 0 0 0 o m fig z o z o 0 s � v N ;y N 0. eq V O O O O O O b h N h h 00 00 et N N M Ol M O O O O O O M 00 0. CO 0. DD 0. 00 0. 00 0. N N �O �O ^ T 0 N N N N N N eq G7 N y G7 y a V. a N U t0�0Dp �0�0pO �0�pp0 0O 10 sO •r 00 00 00 00 00 a as •rr 'V' O p 7 7 V' t} M co m oo M M M co M a M 'V' M en 'R M M M M M M M M h m M M M M M m m M .7i V7 h V7 h h V7 .h-. .V1- an an .h- .h- ti p r^ Q ao >. O o a ot O °0 I O O O O 0 Q P. 0• 0000 y 0 z 0 0 U 0 C7 ww w w w w o 0w v z z z z z w O 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 U 0 0 0 a, v� W U Q Q Q Q a pG N 0 0 U C0 iFc' O nqp V,j U� U U o N N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 (z] "1 O W Fsi g a a a a a 0 0 a z 0 • 00 01 F CO m as a a a N '� cw7 Cw7CO cw7 Cw7 CO w o 0 a .a a U U U o .or F F F F F o .Qa oo. N cn cn cn cn ww WW aEn I .. ., a a0 00 a rx a z Nww a O b 0 0 ,D MO 0 0 0 N 00 00 00 in O in •-• O 0 O 'MV' t0 O O O O O O O O O V1 M ..10° M m r O (V fV O N N O O CT l� 1� r O b 00 00 C co m M M M ti co co M M O eq N N N an O an r M r V1 00 O^ N enN CA en O O N N N N N N Q I O O O O O O g N �'NyJ� N fV tg eN�1` eq .j� 000 000 0000 a00 000 Vti ti H H H . d 1 z 0 w 1 w a 00 pk6 w coen oo ,n W O [�3�C �+ N N Qo w� ° ° cn w 0 c 0 w C_/ .45110 W C` ;? wwj6 IC is3 w c/a m al zv W z a v al m O a o O as - " g 1 mwgPS 1 o I o 3 o o o x x o ° a �a a Q o ;, a 0 a U o o al a " a 1 U 505 a s CO a CA 1 CO 3 U U 1 .:1 1 w a ti U 3 y U a M 1 a 00 1 CO 1 Z paF W U W U W U w U W U w ta O 3 E F ''" S F F r rn F r cn F F F F L a a a d >U �'�- 0 a a] 0 a a 1 a a a M da Cl.. da a a a w a •a 0 al CO VIal CO1.1 q vwi rn a CO CO 0 w di a1 di vl d! al 31 a1 q z z z z O F O p MMMMMMMMM w 0 p a., p a 0 p a., 0 a w w a aa. a a a a v1 CO rn CO CO .W.1 m O O z z a l'.1 CA C7 CA Com" CA CA C" CA CA CA CO CA CA CA CA C11 CA CII 0 `w 1 [w f M 01 1107 A 04 Ca 04 04 z aa'. aa. a a a. a 000 O m w W w w w w w ;yaw t f a a 1 zo o CP ? 0,— 8 ; 8 ,,, G. oh .�+ G. '01,d' h h ^ v0t ti N N N N N N N N msr 7.1- A a �/, N N N N d' N ,/1 N N N N N N N N �O �O VO Va VO VO VO N VO VD VO VD VO VO VO ,O ,a ‘0 VO 8 O fV N tV fV cri gi 0 o o tV o C N DQ\� tV N h C C N G M tV tV tV Oa .rr ¢ O N M 0V N N O 0 00 0 0 Vi OI VVI 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 VVII 0 M ° 0 VI b '0 b 0% 10 ID IC ON 10 N NO NO F •' CO y 0 b 131) b0 a N r N N N r a w .1Q i 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 U D , '�' N N N N N N N 0D0 00 'O r M ON OI ON N N N N N NII ,f1 N N N N 0 a .a M �+ M .-� M .-. M .+ M ., M .. M N N VD VD IO 00•01- IO ID b IO b 0 0%s•D 10 ID IO IO IO 0 U rn .�'. -�, -a- rn rn rn rn rn 00 to M u M oE aG G. JOE 0 0 0 (J �-, ,-, N ^+ M h ON N N M O O O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O M N ID r CO OI OI O1 O 'V' 'V' 'V' 'V' R V' (.+1 M M M M M M a a a vt V' 'V' V' 'O• 'C• 'V• M M M M M M M M M M M M M M h M M M M M M M M M M M ,Z h h h V1 h h h VI VI V, VI V1 V1 VI VI N Vi VI h h V1 h V1 h h a X 0a 4 w w -.4 a 3 al FX CO0 p1 W O O O O O O CO W U a > > F. P a 0 0 0 0 0 o e a . W H 3 0 x 11 O CFO CO of CO CO 01 A. w a°G a F IX 0 a O W a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i w al w CO 0.. CO Dom, 00 CO 0`A, O. 0 °W4 a a: ,g7C O,, QZQ� ,Q7Q O� O O O O O ` 1111 n .. W W1 Ww o 0 N a al � �.. T. .T. .T. q N 000 r kN. O V' sr r N O r co00• '0 0% sON r. Vim'• Oi 0% aal• N N '-I M O� O a, M O CV N Od .r-, o O O 00 0 000 N ^ b N N .r o0 ,n .., • - 1 a tel .--, VD 0 O VI r r r- 0 O Q o 0 0 N 4t gm. cn00 V ti ti ti C C 0 0 ta g 0o N z w N.N N O Vwj w z O 41 44 w e w w U w W w h C 00 00 00 00 00 00 v, � " " za 00 0000000 z w �¢ �¢ o w P P P P P P P o • °� a s 5 w w w w w P • s ] 3 o g 3 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x a ' x x co 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 ` xQ a aaaa 0 O ¢ s aO' O' z Q ram3pav, o ca a w a a a a a a a v u, v1 mr as w .21 UMw � u� u� v� u� a z a. acaacaaa a. E. A a a 0 a a a oa. a a F > > 00 A a v1 0; 0; 0 04 PC 0: a4 g 04 a ea P3 a� co co co co C4 w W 0 o CII 0000000 wa w c4 O o F �yLaWWWWj oW O O W b f 7 0 ^o h h o 0 0 0 0 0 pa N N Vl N N N N N N Iii kei O O O vi O O O O O O O M " b b b b b b NN N N or .4- 6 T 7 V 'd' d' tT ,o N tV 0 fV O tV fV N co d\ fV C G C C G O O G O C M C ,a E N 0 0 rn N Ol 0 0 0 o Ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N c 0• Q E 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 m m ON 0 l0 w o .0 .0 .0 b .0 b w c 'o v "' z t S a •ffi w „ wo O .0 .8 0 en a U a z .. h VOI w N 0 0 ON '-. 0 co00 .a o .. rn ON ON ON Cs rn o, a s w <0 U Q A Vl N N N N N N N N N 0 O "'7 O O .N. ...7; r r b O O V '0 .� N N 0 0 C 0 0 NO N 0 b 01 N N N Vl VI VI 'Na' O 0 pO a O O O O O O O O O O O p p v-, 0j N O p '� u M M �. 'M' M .M. a 4 E M M V' N N N N N N N y 0 0 0 CO ee �N CO M Os 0 G1 0 -+ 0 CO O 7 d' 7 T t <r 7 V' T t wt VN' 'Q m �V ON V voi voi Cl M z M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Vl Vl Vl Vl tel V1 V1 Vl Vl Vl e1. .V1. .VI. V) Vl vi Y1 Vf an VI .V 1. .v1. x A a b 8Ii a 5 a co cn 3 a 4 fra 41 H 0 " . 52 Z) z 0 F t7 c V w U .a"a w w w w w w a W F O 0. a a a x In a a a a w w p q wq p q w p ° A. .,aa C11 M O0 0 0 F F F F F F a N w W N O R P u 0t u P u m a a F F a a a a a a p� M Q� M L4 s en P a P. o w w ww w w w a O O l0 2 0 00 0 V1 O ei,I a I .0. F g �] �] 9 �] 9 9 - .4 .4 0 " 41 Jr 3 a a a 6� 6� a 1 a a a " N " Vi a a P. " " 0. N M O N CO M Ot co O< W .�. O O 0 o O N N N m VI OMO V.1 Y,1 N 00 Os Vl ON .M-•i et M M O ON 00 V • �0 '. M Vl - O oo O O Vl O dO O\ 0+ h h 00 o .-i 01 .-. l0 O 0 N 0 V1 M M 0 telVl i 4 00 00 N 00 00 CO O M 01 O O O V1 O O_ o N N " " " O p O O O ... O • .5 eZ % a a b N ,,00��``QQ�� m00 2 00 M 00 d w z w w 00 enn. N oaf 0' C7 CO > 0 ,o z °� x0 n z ° p O 0 O O O O O ° o a a ' a o � � o MSM • F a. 0 0 o a P O 0 0 0 0 ] 22 p n O ix ce 04 Ix c4 •1 t.0 i ° r 0 a aaaa a°q 0 Q S a a U 4 a a s a w 0 1i 0 O 0 S o 00 ro Q A0 a 0 w 0 o o F COcO o 000 o uJ `n 0 co .a O O O a ao p p a. w a. a Q Q A 0 O v w o ° O a a g a r U 0 C7 C7 O m O O O 1 7, Z ° ° 3 a o �Z F. 0 o ° w [lc ul O O a m d w w 1 z a 00 o In .0. ^ 0 00 o Z M O0 h N N h V1 O Vi ViVi h V1 O O O O OO OO y 8 o O OOOO Z 0Qh N O . o p 0 O 0 O N 'O '0 b b n b '0 b b 10 F.C7 t) ca3 v 01 �zy u g aas aan w cO O U g O p., M N ,� ,°q z a'� 0 ,e. n aa mor �o �n n U S ;❑y&U vl My `_? N 0 ` g000 - t M m ao U C7 O N 0oo h h 00 N N .0I1 VOf h YOl O V 000 .-i .-4 en 0 0 en p0 an � ON tan 00 Cl O O M tin M en fin tin eniM 701 e-- tin en roe M z .tn In --� .'^-. .�.. _ Z .'�. en .N-. .en„ .•ni .'^i .�-1 p o Q 4t d z 0 FL 0 Q 3 a m 0 W 0 OU O M c` 4 0 E uJ 0 0 W A & 3 co C F ] W U z wi ae a °a' 1 a S 4 m �¢ m ww w o 0 0 QwQ ui u -4' . A °G x ?_..< a Q a M w o 3 CO F- ° a 0 U ` o c4 o ce CA w ° (od) 0 Ca CO x oC a CO CO Cf w 4EA > U a r p� A . a' 5 V 0, �, E r4 vii ^ m w m u�i ° p w rz a s a z °9 c w 0 n 'a 1 en F 44 a o o p. ° a s rr en 0Do .. w pa z z� 0 a+ w d d d :12 ti N w w ., z a U-. :a U .-7 O O Cl Cl en en O N N 0 0 V1 01 0 0 0 0 nN N 0 N O O n O1 n M or M'7 rn 'o M O. a a, 41 V1 O O d' ? O 01 M I V' V' Ot b et O O\ O1 n n O O O O %a Y1 C' M O\ Vf Vt en en 0 ON M 7 O O 01 tri 0 0 00 00 ,10 �D 0 000 vi V1 'd' V .-� O� O O_ CO N n n n n n ne. n n 0 Q l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V N N N 4 N N N en en en or en en en no en t- en co en ON en 4 0 it en ca ea en cn en en en h n .M: .M.. .Mi ti .M-. .Mi .Mi .M.. .M.i w CA CV CA m 9 m O CO �D W 7 ` N o z 1 q f-. �j NJ W5 5 5 i CA CA 0 a. y as 0 0 0 W C7 C7 a 43 � a �a Ca W 3 0 w w t� a a s w a. a. Z z Z N N N w U O W a. U U Uz Uz U Uz U o trzi a w co F F F. E E. o A d x M f 30 0 p0p� p0pq p0pq 0pell co co ro co f R� a U O w m m w a s a en a a a a 0 �` CA CIICACI2CIIM 3at a03 a3 4wWQ 2 a o 7 8 E0 z a a a z a s Z z z z d aS d o U U U 0 U U Z 2 Z d w w > m > C w .CA 1 m in a o co0 z to O O N N N vt 0 O O O O O 0 0 O O O R 8 C N O O O O O o N d d so .D iD ea N ..1 E N d o 0 0 0 o as a as o a\ as N N N Ce Ce co ,Z U. C of so N N N O O o M O O O O O M M 0 C 0 ,0 In N N N CrIn 0 . v h . E. w • o o o w N ON M a` O VI N en 141 o U d y0. O O O en 0 N N O� en W OMO OMQO OMO Men N en en V d r-1 .�Ni N N N O Off, b N k" k" W k" VMi vl VI en '�' N P. o. 30 00000 tt R 0 U CO en W N M h et ,o O Vf VD n VI b 00 CS O '0 00 a\ 2 N N N 00 00 a\ O O N o M M N N N M en en M N N N en en er et et M M M M M M M M M h M M h M M M Z ti ti •Ni •moi w An h V1 h ,, In In 8Ual 4 0 0 o al U o C5 a 5 N 41 rml E'l a F0 E O V N O O O z d Wa00000 o a w U w a w 0 3, O a o ] a ° 0 0 0 0 0 0a IXid qN al U w x a tn CA y ai ti F o F 1 ga La al al ca 01 FA5 d F O `D en y (n y uJ ] oNM o O N � en q d 51 en a0 O E. aQ e1.. N N N N N p wwN 0. ..c. a P P 3 of > .. N N N 00 00 0 0 N 00 00 N OI O M 0. O O 0 O O 0 0 O O O O o eF o0 et h ‘A v, O' O O .--I . -� O O o O o 0 O o O O O O COf O'V` 00 O OOi o vi vM �O i O ac so O O O O O o v1 O 0 vi o N N 00 Too 00 O, N N ON of "V N N 000000 V1 N V1 N O O N. N N eq. 00 M N M M N N N N N O 'W f R M N N l- l- en en ^ O O y a , .moi .�+ .�. 0 Qlo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 5N N fV 5 N N 0 0t a, a Ce Ce a ka co Ce as a 00 QO .Mi .Ma en .Mi .Ma .M.� .Mn -.fir U U cl s.• " qoz w 8 z N to U a P z ° ° 1.0 Z 0 .° zz 0 u3 z z z z z w ¢ U ° a. w O , ° p ° cn aapj a 0s o 0 0 ozx o o a CO x co ii O g3 ] ° ] 0 . Ww a wo d d d " w ° 3 w0 M ro w a. a. rird) w z a CA a a a. WoG M 0 F. o CA a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a nam A 'lei 000000000000 a a n a a a a a a a o a Y, aaaaaa � � )1, auO tS 04 U 04 04 W � a -1a O a W a a a a a a a a aa a a w a Q a a a a a a a a a a a a wwwwwwwwwwww U U U U U U U U U U U U a. enN N O F° t aZ .N-' M O NNNNNNNNNNNN 0 O^ G G 0 N4 o 434 4 3 % 4 SISSS sr U e O C V G er 4 ni esi0 rV O O G co G O O O z Cal E o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO en vs n N '0 '0 .o e a oo, a. 0 . � B Z g g 3 0 4 d w rxi, Ur it ,:a 0 U ,n v, .., V, V, .., .n y, y, v, ,, ,r, , N o .n .n h h .n .n .n .n n .n .n v, (�„ C7 z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z o O NNNNNNNNNNNNCO 00 00 CC 00 CO 00 CO CO 00 CO 00 1.0 CO N� [{� rV N O �� U O r a rNN�N N N rN {lam rN rNN rNN rNN rN N N 1. as N � '0 U O O1 01 n 01 O1 O1 Ont O as Q n n N 3 te., O U V• V• V• d• V' V' V' V' V' V V' V' N 00 ,o M o VI VI VI 1r1 N h v, v, v, v, v, v, N O, M V' O V' 7 et V' V' 'cl' eF V' et et' el- el. M V V' v, M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M z N V, V, V, h V, ,n V, V, V, V, Y, sr 00 00 ti vs ti x Q U a a ir al z w 0 w Q rril n 0 ° g z d 0 w a 0 i da g0,, m m ca m PI w w w as w as m ° N g w ° 000000000000 FQ o aoe 1.14 w o a n -� ; H ,o ,a ,a ,a ,o m ,o m ,o ,a o co Oco E c y 0 to• Q o F so u. .. F� F.� v F� v v E� v V.o w -. w •" a - a co fr co 000000000000 mw a E M M o o h o 0 N d• N C ,G 6 C O1 C O\ C 0" o N o O 'V' V1 O1 O C 00 00 O N N M 00 O, O, M ,n M� .M� ^M. .M n 00 N N N M M rnN 6B ^ N 00 b H 0 O an n n n n n N C7 O Q l 0 0 0 0 0 0IQo ry t0` g tg` N asN U it as T 0) a ot a en 0) 0) M ti co co 00 n 0 • 00 to O N O a a m I x gy0 en on ✓ v N N b b h on F ZO o Q a FU ^ A • Pi g o O z V a 0I a 0 D+ a a Z o a w co Z U H �', c4 O H a a .2 C7 0 a t3 '0 on O Fel9 AI .4.o4E1►R14City of Farmington Street ' ;— &it IT Farmington, Minnesota �� 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 �` , www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Tony Wippler,Planning Manager SUBJECT: Seed/Genstar Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan Update-FairhiIl DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION The city of Farmington and Stantec have recently completed the 2016 Seed/Genstar Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan Update and are requesting the city council review and approve the document. DISCUSSION An Alternative Urban Areawide Review(AUAR)is a planning tool that local governments can use to understand how different development scenarios will affect the environment of their community before the development occurs. The process is designed to look at the cumulative impacts of anticipated development scenarios within a given geographical area. The environmental analysis and information from an AUAR can be used to inform local planning and zoning decisions. The original AUAR for the Seed/Genstar property was approved on January 20, 2004 with an update completed on August 21, 2006. A second update was approved by the city council on August 15, 2011. Section 4410.3610 of the EQB Rules states a review of the AUAR must be updated every 5 years until all development in the area has been approved. Due to this requirement a third update to the original AUAR has been completed and is ready for review and approval by the city counciL An update need not start"from scratch,"but rather needs to only revise information in the original documents to the extent necessary to reflect changes that have occurred since the previous updates. The revisions required in the 2016 AUAR update are shown in bold throughout the document. The following is a general synopsis of the major revisions included in the 2016 Update: • Sections were included in the 2016 Update to address the EQB's 2013 EAW Guidelines that recommend analysis of additional topics that were not included in the previous updates. These topics include evaluating the proposed development scenario for consistency with nearby existing uses, nearby zoning, and relevant land use plans. • The Fish,Wildlife and Sensitive Resources section was updated to include information on known occurrences of rare species and natural communities within 1 mile of the study area and updated the mitigation plan in accordance. • The Solid Wastes;Hazardous Wastes; Storage Tanks section was updated to include current statistics for solid waste generation within the community. This section was also updated to include information on on-site or nearby potential sources of contamination or environmental hazards. • Updates to the Traffic section include analyzing traffic forecasts for the year 2036 and amending the text as appropriate. • The Vehicle-Related Air Emissions section was updated to reflect changes to the air quality analysis that have occurred since the 2011 update. • The Nearby Resources section was updated to include language regarding the Dakota County Poor Farm, an archaeological site(21DK0076)that was found along the ridge line towards the center of the property,Jim Bell Park and Preserve, and the North Creek Greenway Master Plan. A draft of the attached document was provided to the EQB and reviewing agencies for a 10-day comment period. Comments were received from the following agencies: • Minnesota Department of Administration State Archaeologist • Minnesota Historical Society • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Dakota County • Minnesota Department of Transportation No objections to the AUAR were filed and all comments received were acknowledged and included in the document where appropriate. BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED 1. Review the 2016 Seed/Genstar Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan Update. 2. Ask questions and/or seek clarification(if needed). 3. Adopt the attached resolution recommending that the city council approve the 2016 Seed/Genstar Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan Update. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description Backup Material 2016 Seed/Genstar AUAR and Mitigation Plan Update Resolution AUAR Resolution FAR4//, o� OA/30G 4611 A pRotto Farmington Seed/Genstar Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Update City of Farmington February 2017 Prepared by: Stantec 193803747 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Table of Contents Question Number (corresponding to EAW Form) Page No. 1. Project Title 1 2. Proposer 1 3. RGU 2 4. Reason for EAU Preparation 2 5. Project Location 2 6. Description 10 7. Project Magnitude 18 8. Permit and Approvals Required 19 9. Land Use 20 10. Cover Types 20 11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically-Sensitive Resources 31 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources 36 13. Water Use 40 14. Water-Related Land Use Management Districts 45 15. Water Surface Use 47 16. Erosion and Sedimentation 47 17. Water Quality-Surface Water Runoff 50 18. Water Quality-Wastewaters 62 19. Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions 64 20. Solid Waste;Hazardous Waste; Storage Tanks 71 21. Traffic 76 22. Vehicle-Related Air Emissions 109 23. Stationary Source Air Emissions 110 24. Dust, Odors,Noise 110 25. Nearby Resources 116 26. Visual Impacts 120 27. Compatibility with Plans 120 28. Impact on Infrastructure and Public Services 121 29. Related Developments; Cumulative Impacts 123 30. Other Potential Environmental Impacts 124 31. Summary of Issues 124 32. Mitigation Plan 125 34. Appendices 144 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Farmington Seed/Genstar Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Update Note to Reviewers This is an Update to the Seed/Genstar AUAR The Final Seed/Genstar AUAR was adopted in January 2004.An update to this document was approved July 17, 2006 to address changes in land use and transportation networks. A subsequent five-year update was adopted by the City of Farmington on August 15`h, 2011. This update meets the mandatory update requirements of Minnesota Rule 4410.3610,Subpart 7. Analysis that has been updated since the 2011 Update is Indicated In bold Century Gothic type throughout the document. Comments on this Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Update should be submitted to the City of Farmington (See Item 3) during the 10-day Objection Period following receipt of the AUAR Update document. A copy of any letter of objection must be filed with the EQB staff as well. An objection may be filed only if the agency filing the objection has evidence that the revised document contains inaccurate or incomplete information relevant to the identification and mitigation of potentially significant environmental impacts or that the proposed plan for mitigation will be inadequate to prevent potentially significant environmental impacts from occurring(Minnesota Rule 4410.3610,Subpart 5D.) 1. Project Title Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update 2. Proposer City of Farmington Contact Person Adam Kienberger,Community Development Dept. Address 430 Third Street Farmington,MN 55024 Phone (651)280-6820 Fax (651)280-6839 Email address akienberger@cilannington.mn.us 1 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 3. RGU City of Farmington Contact Person Adam Kienberger,Community Development Dept. Address 430 Third Street Farmington,MN 55024 Phone (651)280-6820 Fax (651)280-6839 Email address akienberger@cifarmington.mn.us 4. Reason for EAW Preparation (technically not applicable to an AUAR) 5. Project Location Sections (all or portion): Sections 7, 18 and 19 of T. 114N,R.20W County: Dakota City/Township: Farmington. (The AUAR Study Area was annexed by Farmington from Empire Township in two stages in 2006 and 2007. Farmington has acted as the RGU since the original AUAR was produced in 2004.) Attach copies of each of the following to the EAW/AUAR: a. Copy(ies) of USGS 7.5 minute, 1:24:000 scale map (photocopy is OK) indicating the project boundaries; b. Maps of the following: 1) a map clearly depicting the boundaries of the AUAR and any subdistricts used in the AUAR analysis 2) land use and planning and zoning maps as required in conjunction with items 9 and 28;and 3) a cover type map as required by item 10. Additional maps may be included throughout the document wherever maps are useful for displaying the relevant information. The maps listed below are included on the pages that follow: • Figure 5-1. Project Location:A map indicating the project location and its regional context. • Figure 5-2. Project Boundaries:A map depicting the project boundary of the Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update. • Figure 5-3. Existing Zoning: A map showing current zoning in and around the AUAR Study Area. • Figure 5-4. Existing Land Use: A map showing current land use in and around the AUAR Study Area. 2 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 • Figure 5-5. Proposed Land Use, Seed Genstar AUAR—January,2004: A map showing proposed land use in and around the AUAR Study Area in the original AUAR. • Figure 5-6. Proposed Land Use,2030 Comprehensive Plan-2008 Update. Additional maps are provided throughout the document as needed to display relevant information for each issue. 3 . 1 _� w 0 , r r y . ch NP Ibi. A , _ ,. i,...,, , , ,.....,, r `o ii ,. < 4- • - , Little __,_1� , G Canada's r "' 'fib' , 1 k V • RosevilleSI- , lb . lewood a _�_ Golden Valley„ i 111 Faicon + Heights RAMSEY Lake lrrio HENNE Minneapolis COUNTY �' COU St Paul ' . ° .] WASHINGTON ,. .SLouis Minnetonka Park coUAETY Hopkins . ,k , 1 t A ♦, \ •c « — West, Woodbury Afton 11 St Paul South § Edina ` St Paul w . . % '�' Mendota •Sfish' ' Richfield un ,• • Newport ' Heigtits Lake ., , 1 d' 1. ' i+ • i , Eden-Prairie's Blmi • "r St Paul �' oongton 1mark Inver Grove- •'-Eagan Heights Cottage Grove Shakopeetiy • a_ ["-43 - Burnsville / -6--.r. .'_--- Savage • s' - Rosemount ' I � + . T o . • "s Apple Valley • - • Project l ,` \` Prior Lake t Hastings` �,,' :410 x Farmington Location Coa es -L�' Vermillion ,� ' Township Credi,Rivier y' Lakeville `Empire Marshan SCOTT Township Township Verrmillion Township _k COON Y , DA OTA COINTY - New Market ` - 1, Township_ Castle Rock Hampton New TLI ri r L Eureka Hampton111 - Township Township Miesville New Market Township Elko . Randolph i i4ikR.4r ,. City of Farmington Ai. Seed-Genstar ® Study Area Boundary 1 l\ / AUAR-Update = City of Farmington Bonestroo County Boundary Miles PROJECT LOCATION 1 I Figure 5-1 June 2011 5 0 5 K:\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\Fig 5-1 Project Location.mxd V u; I I J. ts .'"'. '.'\.'. ..\ c 1 .... 0 I � ,,v . i /D __ Jiii\ „ (-----..„.., /)‘>-- t. . . i. Lci-,,,f 21;:v j ---I — • 'lir I Ai A ,...7,..L,... ...... ...., _ 1164" t.,.o • .7-s--\_,,,k \ 111S..i t, I 111(c .- 0 j/)LxitL---...„ Uri... .17-7:, ,44( N ., SU.. • D...,,... ii,.11 ik, ii / — -.--.-- ,...i."908 \\�--•_ �� T� \\\... ill if r NW ‘ 11 1 iii ithi._`.z[2 ,2:2_,N, . ,,: \\ ,- , . \ - i ni. ,1,. . .., \ - ----,Eh" . , • .N. \ 1FL: - , / , ( yl ii 906 . .• 9// ill - _..../'�-.�aa _ia 1, .u.,.. i tai---- ... PST 4 �' :i y, v � ■i wj p'+ - ,1. 1 '1O P ��.� i \c, 'I BVI i �. / 'i .---1.. _ I Imo, -_? • 4. ----, 932 \ 903 j: � •- ---- � ____.--:---_ 7--------':- .- � ._ - \ i � � �' ‘Gravel Pit fl A City of Farmington 4EARMj, Seed-Genstar NStudyArea Boundary ,`a r�jr City Boundary .fir si AUAR-Update r ,/ Railroad Bonestroo Feet Project Boundary with USGS Parcel Base Map I Figure 5-2 June 2011 1,200 0 1,200 K.\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\Fig 5-2 Project Boundary.mxd N W ! r, /1 S 1 1 iiii ' i i it 1 i i i 1 i i i 1 \ 0 „ [ L riNil 1 \\ \\ ,Q. ....,_ti 2 IR �) - ! �i %t� 89th - i I i )- 1 i P — I 1 i I \ 194th St W ,_-- �, \ /11- Kti.i._Lliii Ilii \-- ' ,�,c) Cityof Farmington I I R-1,Low Density Residential 100-Year Floodplain 4ikko �.�OE �,; Seed-Genstar =R-2,Low/Medium Density Residential N Study Area Boundary C11,. Stantec yAUAR-Update' n R-3,Medium Density Residential 'ham City Boundary g; =Mixed Use(Commercial/Residential) A/Railroad Feet " Existing Zoning ol P/OS,Park/Open Space Parcel Base Map I Planned Unit Development(PUD) i ' Figure 5-3 November2016 1,200 0 1,200 V:\1938\active\193803747\GIS\Projects\Fig 5-3 Zoning mxd N 1 t / W .)r E / , S 04 1 ii\ir ' i .. m -: __L \ a'\ (1 •-... \ \_ OFT _ Iii, mrsim. I%.4 i i u IP40111 11, .1..11% o „-44-4 fo aw (13 iii \\\plir IIIIIOIIIIIIIIF— ISII�utis,•����•�u.latailp Ni \III,, � I11I1111� .���IMMO ligtill11111111 �` ., •.■■... 111111/ Mt •:3(11,114% :LI':lT� ' II • ` •�ll arm liti e• otosit , ° II El •111111,..,*:40-1:4/ ....A \ Illtdamlinikin = �►v. boo 0�► 4111111111111111* =t®r- •t •� ��is 1...14911.n NJ 0 City of Farmington QAUARArea Eal Farmstead -Park.Recreational.orPreserve .41kRM/,iio Seed-Genstar 7�City Boundary IMGolfCourse I I Single Family Attached ( Stantec _ AUAR-Update 2016 I I Parcels ®Industrial and Utility I I Single Family Detached \ Land Use _Mixed Use Industrial I I Undeveloped Feet --- Existing Land Use I i Agricuhnral 1 I Open Water I I Figure 5-4 November2016 1,200 0 1,200 V:\1938\active\193803747\GIS\Projects\Fig 5-4 ExistingLandUse.mxd / / N / W ) E / Jr / S r !' M_e_� ' :dr e, , , ., L / , 1 . /./ iir . 1 /////e6 , ! 4A% , \,,,, „, _..., / all i /_v/ 11111 ',1,„ , ' fillik - , �r t r '4--Ac • �r PI 1111\° _ 1 ir1. �'�.�\ a 1t h _ — _ _ y----- \ / , 2 ..,„, // \ / r _, , •.. , I Ora ` ,194th St \ ,/�`� ,- ' , i aiblIfit n Low Density(1.0-3.5 du/ac) N Study Area Boundary City of Farmington I—I Low/Medium(3.5-6.0 du/ac) / City Boundary ..atta,AiSeed-Genstar I I Medium Density(6.0-12.0 du/ac) Railroad m Mixed Use(Commercial/Residential) Parcel Base Map 7r AUAR Update n Park/Open Space Proposed Land Use 1-1 Public/Semi-Public Bonestroo Feet p ®100-Year Floodplain 1 Updated June 2011 1,200 0 1,200 Figure 5-6 K:\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\Fig 5-6 Proposed Land Use Updated.mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 6. Description AUAR replaces the EAW format with a description of > The anticipated types and intensity (density) of residential and non- residential development throughout the AUAR area. > Infrastructure planned to serve development (roads, sewers, water, stormwater system, etc.) Roadways intended primarily to serve as adjoining land uses within an AUAR are normally expected to be reviewed as part of an AUAR. More "arterial"types of roadways that would cross an AUAR area are an optional inclusion in the AUAR analysis; if they are included, a more intensive level of review, generally including an analysis of alternative routes, is necessary. Information about the staging of various developments, to the extent known, and of the infrastructure, and how the infrastructure staging will influence the development schedule. a. Anticipated types and intensity (density of residential, commercial/warehouse and light industrial development) throughout the AUAR area: Introduction The Seed/Genstar Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) encompasses approximately 965 acres in the northeast corner of the City of Farmington. The area is mostly undeveloped farmland with North Creek bisecting the property from the northwest to the southeast. The topography is relatively flat in the western portion of the property along the North Creek floodplain and provides rolling topography towards the east. The landowner for the property is Seed Family Trust and Finnegan. The development scenario analyzed in this AUAR consists of mostly single-family residential land use with interspersed pockets of multi-family residential and a small mixed-use commercial/residential area at the northwest corner of 195th and TH3. The State of Minnesota Municipal Board approved an orderly annexation agreement between Farmington and Empire Township in May of 1999. In 2006, 520.22 acres of this property were approved for annexation. On February 15,2007,the remaining 445 acres, including the CP railroad were annexed.The property was in agricultural preserve until the designation expired in 2001. The property was granted MUSA status during the City's MUSA allocation process. The current zoning and land use classifications for the AUAR study area and surrounding neighborhoods are shown on Figures 5-3 and 5-4 respectively. Figure 5-5 identifies the proposed land use for the site that was used for the AUAR analysis in 2003-4. Figure 5-6 identifies the revised land use plan analyzed In both the 2011 Update and this 2016 Update,matching the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.The acres of each proposed 10 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 land use type remained approximately the same between the 2004 Final AUAR and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Changes included in the comprehensive plan are the following: • Medium-density residential and commercial designations remain the same in size, but some areas were shifted in location to the south,to the area along the completed 195th Street. • The extension of 195th Street has been completed. This was a collaborative project by the developer/property owner,City and Dakota County,to provide the east/west connection for 195th Street to TH 3. The Comprehensive Plan also discusses a potential extension of Diamond Path Road through the AUAR area. While Diamond Path is included in the AUAR, City Staff will continue to review the feasibility of the road as this project moves forward. • The developer has dedicated 42 acres for a youth athletic complex proposed at the southwest corner of the property. Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential area is proposed at the northwest corner of 195t Street and TH 3 because of the accessibility potential in this area. The mixed-use commercial/residential area is intended to include neighborhood commercial uses that support the area residents and can be easily accessible by walking or through short vehicle trips, should such uses prove feasible. The fmal land use proposed for the study area is the natural open space that consists of the North Creek and its floodplain. This use is unchanged from the original AUAR. This use will assist in buffering the low and medium-density residential areas from the rail line,will preserve important natural resources and habitat connections,will provide natural areas for walking trails and passive recreation,and may be used for sustained agricultural purposes. The Planned Acres for each land use type have not changed since the original AUAR— only the location of these uses shifted after the City adopted its 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The following table indicates existing land use and future planned land use by land area for the AUAR Study Area according to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan: Land Use Category Existing Acres Planned Acres Rural Residential 55 0 Agriculture or Vacant 880 122 (including natural areas and wetlands*) Low and Low/Medium 0 558 Density Residential Medium Density 0 120 Residential Mixed Use/Commercial 0 29 Parks**/Rail/ROW 30 136 TOTAL AREA 965 965 *Includes herbaceous,scrub-shrub and woody wetlands **Parkland will likely have a combination of cover types,but is included in developed land since it is currently proposed. 11 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 The following residential land use designations explain the housing choices for the AUAR Study Area. • Low-Density Residential is established to provide for low-density development with full public utilities in a sequence that will prevent the occurrence of premature scattered urban development. The designation provides for a residential density range is 1.0 to 3.5 units per acre in this designation. • Low/Medium Density Residential will provide for attached and detached townhomes with a density range of 3.5 to 6.0 units per acre. • Medium-Density Residential designates areas for development of townhomes in areas with access to employment, services,public facilities,and transportation corridors and that are served with full public utilities. The designation provides for a residential density range of 6.0 to 12.0. • Mixed Use Commercial/Residential contemplates a comprehensively designed neighborhood development with a multi-family component. b. Infrastructure planned to serve the development (roads, sewers, water, stormwater system, etc.) Roadways intended primarily to serve the adjoining land uses within an AUAR area are normally expected to be a part of an AUAR More "arterial" types of roadways that would cross an AUAR area are an optional inclusion in the AUAR analysis; if they are to be included, a more intensive level of review, generally including an analysis of alternative routes, is necessary;) Roadway Network The 2004 Seed/Genstar AUAR Update identified the need for an east-west connection through the AUAR Study Area to State Highway 3. The location and design of the connection were conceptual at that time. In January,2006 the City completed a Feasibility Study that recommended a route and design for the 195th Street extension,and the potential environmental impacts and mitigation. The City has since completed the extension of 195th Street from its current easterly terminus at Diamond Path Road westerly to Trunk Highway 3. The 195th Street extension connection was completed and open to traffic on September 23r1,2009. The roadway includes a bridge over North Creek and the Canadian Pacific Railway as a key component of the project. The bridge will minimize environmental impacts to the creek and wetland when compared with other design alternatives for the roadway. Full buildout of the AUAR study area will increase the traffic volumes on roadways within the site vicinity. The original AUAR traffic analysis indicated the improvements and mitigation strategies that will be needed to accommodate the increased traffic. 12 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Improvements that may be needed based upon the implications of full buildout would include widening TH3 to a four-lane section in the area, signalization or roundabout control for several intersections that are currently stop-controlled,and additional lanes or turn lanes on other roadways in the area. The 2006 Update and the City's Comprehensive Plan includes the potential extension of Diamond Path Road through the AUAR area. While Diamond Path is included in the AUAR, City Staff will continue to review the feasibility of the road as this project moves forward. Since no development has occurred on the Seed/Genstar property since the 2011 AUAR Update,this 2016 AUAR Update presents analysis of background traffic growth in the year 2036 but assumes the same trip generation from the development as In previous AUAR updates. Sanitary Sewer System The study area is not currently served by sanitary sewer. An addendum to the City of Farmington's May 1996 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan was prepared in early 2002 that incorporates trunk sewer service to the study area. The proposed trunk sewer system is shown in Figure 18-1. It consists primarily of gravity trunk sewers with one lift station and force main. Metropolitan sewer service will be provided to the study area by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) existing 48-inch Apple Valley Interceptor. This interceptor currently bisects the AUAR study area, which is fully within current MUSA staging areas for the City of Farmington. However,no connecting lines within the AUAR study area have yet been constructed. This interceptor will convey the wastewater to the Empire Wastewater Treatment Plant. Municipal Water System The City of Farmington currently has eight municipal wells, designed to meet the City's water demands until at least the year 2020. Water supply trunk lines will be added in the AUAR study area to connect the area to the City's current water supply system. These trunks will range in diameter from 16 to 20 inches. A 5.0-million gallon ground storage water reservoir is proposed within the AUAR study area. This ground storage system is primarily intended to expand the City's water storage capacity to accommodate for peak demand as the community grows.Ultimately,the size of this future storage facility may be adjusted based on actual community growth. The source of water for the area will be the City of Farmington's current municipal wells completed in the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer. Development of the area will likely require additional pumping of the City's current wells to meet proposed demand,and the water supply system was designed to meet this projected demand. 13 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Stormwater System Stormwater from the majority of the AUAR study area will drain to North Creek,a tributary of the Vermillion River. Two smaller subwatersheds within the AUAR area drain directly to the Vermillion River. Development in the AUAR study area will be required to meet the most recent permit standards as contained in the NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit and the city's NPDES MS4 General Permit. Meeting these standards for the AUAR study area is expected to provide adequate protection to North Creek regarding runoff volume,thermal loads,and other runoff- driven pollutants. Meeting the standards will reduce runoff volume and pollutant loads below those generated by the existing conditions on the site. Compliance with the MPCA standard requires stormwater best management practices to control run-off volume and associated pollutant loads for the development intensity proposed. These approaches and the stormwater management system for the AUAR area are detailed in Section 17 and the Mitigation Plan. c. Information about the anticipated staging of various developments, to the extent known, and of the infrastructure, and how the infrastructure staging will influence the development schedule. The AUAR Study Area has been fully annexed into the City of Farmington and granted MUSA status. The AUAR Study Area is included in a proposed Growth Area identified in the City of Farmington Comprehensive Plan. The area is expected to be developed as a cohesive Planned Unit Development, however no formal development proposals has been submitted to the City for formal review. Development is expected to be staged over several years and will depend on market conditions. Since the 2011 AUAR Update, no development has occurred in the AUAR area and no development proposals have been submitted to the City for formal review. In 2016, a developer shared concept plans with City staff and indicated his intent to submit formal plans for development within the 90 acres in the southeast corner of the AUAR area currently zoned for a PUD.The concept plan primarily depicts residential uses with a small commercial space and open space used for urban agriculture.The concept plan identifies potential uses within the area as follows: Concept Plan Lots/units 45 acres/ 173-203 units Open space 26 acres R/W 17 acres Commercial 2 acres Total ±90 acres The intensity of uses proposed in this concept plan are well below the project magnitudes identified in Section 7. For this reason, and because no formal development plans have 14 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 been submitted to the City of Farmington,this concept plan will not be analyzed separately in this AUAR Update. Note: the RGU must assure that the development described complies with the requirements of 4410.3610, subpart 3, and that it properly orders the AUAR and sets the description in that order as required by that section. The City of Farmington has an approved comprehensive plan as required by the referenced rules. The City adopted the Comprehensive Plan in May,2000. The Metropolitan Council approved the plan in March, 2000. The Farmington City Council adopted an official resolution ordering the AUAR as required on July 15,2002. The City Council adopted the Final Seed/Genstar AUAR in January, 2004. In 2009, the City adopted its 2030 Comprehensive Plan,which is the current land use plan guiding growth of the City. Consistency with Farmington's Comprehensive Plan The proposed development is consistent with the Farmington 2030 Comprehensive Plan, and will assist the City to meet the following goals: 1) Provide for low and medium density residential development. 2) Provide for quality controlled growth in stages where major infrastructure improvements are provided to developable areas. 3) Preserve the natural open space as a passive recreational area and extend the City trail system into this area. 4) Maximize preservation of the district's rolling topography and other natural amenities through new subdivision standards that require environmental conservation measures. 5) Design a future commercial center to be pedestrian and neighborhood- oriented in scale and character. 6) Promote only neighborhood-serving commercial uses in well-designed and pedestrian friendly commercial districts along Trunk Highway 3. No commercial strip developments will be permitted. The following sections are added to this 2016 Update to address the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board's 2013 EAW Guidelines,which recommend analysis of additional topics not included in the 2003/4 AUAR or the 2006 and 2011 Updates.These topics include evaluating the proposed development scenario for consistency with nearby existing uses,nearby zoning,and relevant land use plans. Consistency with Nearby Land Use Currently,land surrounding the AUAR study area is used primarily for low density residential uses,park and open space,and agricultural uses.The majority of the AUAR study area is proposed for low and medium density residential uses that are consistent with nearby housing developments.A small portion of the AUAR study area near 195th Street and Chippendale Avenue(TH 3)is proposed for mixed use or commercial development.This is intended to serve nearby residences.A mixed use commercial residential development is proposed in the AUAR study area along TH 3,intended to provide commercial opportunities serving new and existing residential neighborhoods. 15 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 The Jim Bell Park and Preserve Is located on the western border of the AUAR area and the City intends to expand this park eastward into the AUAR area in the future.Compatibility with this resource is discussed further in Section 25. Consistency with Nearby Zoning Currently,land around the AUAR study area is zoned for low and medium density residential uses as well as park and open space. The proposal of additional low and medium density residential units to the AUAR study area is consistent with zoning surrounding the site. Proposed development of the AUAR study area also includes a mixed use commercial/residential district.Mixed use commercial/residential districts are Intended to provide high quality,comprehensively designed commercial neighborhood development with a multi-family component.The inclusion of this land use in the AUAR study area allows for a mix of housing types and uses that will support community residents. The AUAR area is also included in a Planned Unit Development(PUD)overlay.This PUD was submitted by Newland Communities and approved in 2008 by the City of Farmington.The PUD incorporates a mix of single family and multifamily residential, mixed uses and park and open space.Since approval of the PUD,no development has occurred on the site. All zoning districts,including the PUD overlay are illustrated In Figure 5-3 Zoning. Consistency with the Jim Bell Park and Preserve Master Plan A master plan for the southwestern most corner of the AUAR area has been developed as an expansion of the Jim Bell Park and Preserve(see Figure 6-1).The master plan calls for new recreational fields,a warming house,and an integrated trail network. Proposed development in the AUAR area for low and medium density residential development and associated park space are consistent with this master plan.The planned park expansion would serve new and existing neighborhood residents. Provide a 50 or fewer word abstract for EQB Monitor notice: The Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR study area is located on approximately 965 acres in the City of Farmington, in Dakota County, Minnesota. The City will act as the RGU for the AUAR Update. This document updates the AUAR adopted in January 2004, with subsequent updates in 2006 and 2011, and includes an updated Mitigation Plan. Jim Bell Park and Preserve City Council Approved Master Plan on November 5,2007. PEDESTRIAN TRAILS • BRIDGE •t CON INUE ACROSS CREEK 30 PARKING CITY WIDE TRAIL NO " (CONCEPTUAL Foiur.n..cAM+h...l � ALONG ' C ) LOCATION) SPACES---...„„___r_...1410-4/111 0 CONNECTION / L ',.`REE cif / TRAILS ��y • ••' CONTINUE SMALL '` ? _ RAINWATER GARDENS ��., COMMUNI /( ALONG I,• NAY SOUTH SHELTER :i - • ._.. _.TYPICAL �� GREETRN` REEK SMALL PLAY ._FLEXIBLE USE �,� - �•••\...ENTRY �/ STRUCTURE ° PLAYING FIELDS �p7t _ _ .- C •:4- • .� K 7 - "OVER-FLOW PARKING w . TRAILMIONI R PARK - O-41 f. ,�� �/ ENTRY SIGN [ l^ ®I ' r!.�'HK:FE 1.3 a •*.S I tt/,, CONNECTION $ O ' /,,-- O `, A, S• CRI L h, ' Ik TO TRAILS IN 3 ;, 3 YOUTH ./ LACK.••It vri, ..T 1 L .• _, ,. FARMINGTON I" / YOUTHgi._ -BASEBALL T c BASEBALL- ( • \ i<h rfffluis TI`I,,.." °" • �/ PRESERVE / 170 , EQUIPMENT .at. T+` k °* _! �T is i.E t S.. STORAGE �. S 'V. � • ' FUTURE GRADE t..�b•r- lit: r • • ` _ SEPARATED TRAIL ,,//S t l w 1•'• _� • ,5'1; �.- F J! f� CROSSING .� 4 • (;[J;,,.r7dd P! //J BATTING CAGE! -- ° O-'�o , A •• .�` • CONCESSION AND ".�� �� YOUTH `1 • �k.�. > !. RESTROOMS - N, / •? ,�i • (�' 0`s,0O BASEBALL BATTING CAGE _—iPM. >•'. , /�5 - ,• YOUTH N' SMALL PLAY BASEBALL ,p YOUTH 1\ `a +, STRUCTURE 0 BASEBALL�, v/ y ` PARKING.300 SPACE-- ---- ir4 \ "•'. ' i- ,, '"%, ..;",Allr (APPROX) S a I•RACT/C.F L ,%'' L C'! PARK ENTRY WITH PARK SIGN (� :1� AND LANDSCAPING AREA t` 8 - -� t t,.. • ,J' ® .cam u ./'� •a'1 1 PARKING LOT WITH 050(APPROX.) T� Be;e t c/ c c c L1 l / SPACES t o , ! <l s .... a t: FI FXIRI F I. ;f .r . C P!`� © FL4YING FIELD f f. 715' P225_� l ( - !. c 7 FIFES! IISF 1 LigPLAve,i,FIELDS a _� WARMING HOUSE/ SOCCE2 SOCCER € � '�• SHELTER LACI'O.SE LACROSSE `. ® K•. I . ..._...0 •, Q� r(rj ICE HOCKEY W/IN-LINE r7 • •1 I.- "7. SKATING WAIGHTS& LARI(SIGPI G° f(UTURE^COMMUNITIYT OPEN SKATE O, CENITER SITE' * 2-12 AGE PLAYGROUND y��,.r� - OO K��. •w�' 'LIGHTED ETBALL COURTS .`110 FULL BASKETBALL COURT CONNECTION TO p EXISTING t., TRAIL _.-' + . TRAIL.TVP Farmington , Minnesota II.!.ioaon 6o3m13r droop.Inc. MIN Mil City of Farmington F Seed-Genstar StantecAUAR-Update 2016 �•.--`I im Bell Park and J Preserve Master Plan November 2016 Figure 6-1 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 7. Project Magnitude Data The cumulative totals of the parameters called for should be given for each major development scenario. One development scenario is proposed for this AUAR. The cumulative totals for the proposed development are as follows: Cumulative Development Totals— The following table represents projected cumulative development totals for the AUAR Study Area.These totals are based on policies and standards as established within the City of Farmington Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. TOTAL PROJECT ACREAGE 965 Acres Number of Residential Units(3,896 total units max.) 1,666 Attached 2,230 Detached (maximum) (maximum) Maximum Units Per Building Varies Mixed Use Commercial Building Area(Retail) 254,000 square feet Maximum Building Height Residential:35' (3 stories) Commercial:45' (4 stories) 18 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 8. Permits and Approvals Required List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, and funding required.A list of major approvals likely to be required by the anticipated types of development projects should be given. This list will help orient reviewers to the idea that the AUAR process is only one piece of the regulatory framework that will protect environmental resources. The list can also serve as a starting point for the development of the implementation aspects of the mitigation plan to be developed as part of the AUAR TABLE 8-1 REQUIRED PERMITS Unit of Government Type of Application City of Farmington Preliminary Plat Approval, Final Plat Approval Planned Unit Development(PUD)Permit, Grading Permits, Water Connection Permits, Building Permits, Wetland Conservation Act Permits and Approvals Dakota County County Roadway Access Permits Contiguous Plat Review Private Well Construction and Sealing Permits Metropolitan Council/Envir. Services Tier 2 Sewer Plan, Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Air Emission Facility Permits Indirect Source Permit(ISP),401 Grading Permit, 401 Water Quality Permit, NPDES Permit, Storm Water Permit, Sanitary Sewer Permit, Wastewater Permit Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Plan Review Water main construction permit Wellhead Protection Plan Municipal Well Permitting Minnesota Dept.of Natural Resources Protected Waters Permit Water Appropriation Permits Dewatering permit and utilities permit Minnesota Dept. of Transportation State Highway Access Permits U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Individual 404 Permit, Letter of Permission for Wetland Impacts Vermillion River Watershed JPO Grading and Stormwater Permits Review The following is a list of activities that may occur in the AUAR area requiring a water appropriation permit:building,utility,or water main construction dewatering;irrigation;or stormwater reuse of greater than 10,000 gallons/day or 1,000,000 gallons/year. 19 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 9. Land Use Describe the current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss the compatibility of the project with adjacent and nearby land uses; indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Idents any potential environmental hazard due to past land uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks. Item 9 is covered by items 5,6,20 and 28. See items 5, 6,20 and 28. 10. Cover Types The following information should be provided: a. a cover type map, at least at the scale of a USGS topographic map, depicting: • wetlands–identified by type (Circular 39) • watercourses—rivers, streams, creeks, ditches • lakes—idents protected water status and shoreland management classification • woodlands—identify native and old field • cropland • current development b. an "overlay" map showing anticipated development in relation to the cover types; this map should also depict any "protection areas", existing or proposed, that will preserve sensitive cover types. Separate maps for each major development scenario should generally be provided The generalized breakdown of cover types before and after development is shown on the chart that follows. The location of cover types is shown in Figure 10-1. COVER TYPES Cover Type Acres Before After Wetlands* 118 118 Forest/Woodland 23 4 Dry Grassland 10 0 Grassland Tree Complex 14 0 Maintained Grasses 105 0 Cropland 640 0 Developed: 55 843 Rural Residential 25 0 Urban Residential 0 678 Mixed Use/Commercial 0 29 Parks**/Rail/ROW 30 136 TOTAL AREA 965 965 *Includes herbaceous,scrub-shrub and woody wetlands. **parkland will likely have a combination of cover types,but is included in developed land since it is currently proposed. 20 N \l/ PEMA LAf, 1 W �1 E PE i S B/ 01 P I 6 • / IIII' PEN: \ I 1 PEMB/ j' PEI F11/61 PSS16 i I l PS : 1 � i L. 'S _L +—i Railroad \ ` — ✓/ , B•/ i••_•i City Boundary +� I �� �� Study Area Boundary Parcels `` Land Cover ,t i I:1 Cropland lay \ •a - Developed PEMA/V'' \ MB/C E Dry Grassland 7891./i -...„,......., \ i - Forest/Woodland 1 \ \ PEMBI ! - Grassland Tree Complex \ PSS1Bf I Maintained Grasses PEMB t 195th St W . 1 • Wetland \'EMA C). 4 ,__, PPS I : I P ; NH ® � � r♦ MkI . ' -' Ali lir P�MB 1 ' ir Ilk rri I > :E1i " z rrII Ir — City of Farmington Fm` Seed-Genstar ci Stantec AUAR-Update Feet ��" � Land Cover December2016 V:\1938\active\193803747\GIS\Projects\ 1,200 0 1,200 Figure 10-1 Fig 10-1 Land Cover.mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Cover Types Major cover types in the AUAR Study Area currently include cropland,pasture/grassland, wetland and floodplain, and right of way for railroad and State Highway 3. The area also includes small isolated wood lots and farmsteads. Cropland is the most abundant cover type. The change in land cover that is expected to occur as a result of development of the area is a conversion of cropland and pasture to urban residential and commercial uses. Existing acreages of wetland, floodplain, and existing right-of-way cover types are expected to remain as the area is developed. Upland Communities: Grassland/Pasture Communities and Woodlots—No additional impacts to Upland Communities are expected with the changes proposed to land use since the 2004 Final AUAR. The amount and type of upland communities that will be impacted by these uses are the same as those anticipated in the original AUAR. A field evaluation of the site indicated that the pasture areas consist of common exotic pasture and meadow plant species. The grassland and cropland are of low native diversity. Small isolated woodlands also exist within the study area. These are woodlots associated with the farmsteads in the area. The woodlands are highly disturbed and invaded by exotic species. They are of low ecological quality. No upland natural areas of high quality were identified in the study area by the Minnesota County Biological Survey or the Dakota County Farmland and Natural Area Protection Plan (2002). Wetlands and Floodplain In 2009 the two-lane segment of 195th was completed providing the necessary east/west connection to TH 3. The selected alignment was chosen by the City in part because it minimizes impacts to wetlands and the floodplain in comparison to other potential alignments. Wetland mitigation measures were completed with the roadway construction as shown in Figure 10-3. Construction efforts followed mitigation strategies to minimize any impacts from the new roadway. Figure 10-3 displays the area of wetland and floodplain mitigation completed for the construction of 195th Street. A single wetland mitigation area of over six (6) acres was constructed at the same time as 195th Street rather than multiple smaller mitigation sites. This single site exceeds the total mitigation area needed for the 195th St.project.The City did not initiate a wetland banking process for the excess wetland and the 195th St.project did not result in any wetland credits available for use elsewhere. The 2004 AURA and the City's Comprehensive Plan also proposed a potential extension of Diamond Path Road through the AUAR area. While Diamond Path is included in the 22 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 AUAR, City Staff will continue to review the feasibility of the road as this project moves forward. Figure 10-1 identifies the wetlands in the AUAR study area and their types. Figure 17-1 indicates the classification assigned to wetlands based on the City's wetland inventory and management plan. The City completed a wetland inventory and functions and values assessment of all wetlands in the City as a part of its Surface Water Management Plan. Wetlands were classified in 4 classes based on their plant community characteristics and susceptibility to stormwater impacts. The highest quality wetlands (Protect classification) receive the highest protection, while lower classes (Manage 1, Manage 2, and Utilize) receive lower protection. The City subsequently adopted a Wetland Ordinance that establishes the protection requirements for each wetland class, including buffers. The wetlands in the AUAR study area were delineated by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., in early 2002. The data gathered by Westwood was field verified by Bonestroo staff, who then classified the wetlands in the study area based on the system used in the rest of the City in its Surface Water Plan to the AUAR study area. Classifications shown on Figure 17-1 are consistent with the City's plan, and City policies and ordinances will be applied in the AUAR area as development occurs. The highest concentration of wetlands in the AUAR study area is along the North Creek corridor. These wetlands have been classified as Manage 2 wetlands in the City's Wetland Management Plan,but may be reclassified as"Protect"wetlands due to their adjacency to North Creek,a tributary to North Creek,a designated trout stream. Several smaller wetland areas are scattered throughout the site. Two of these wetlands are classified as "Protect", and another wetland is classified as "Manage 1". These are the highest quality wetlands remaining within the study area,and are given the highest level of protection by the City's plans and ordinances. The remaining wetland areas are classified in the"Utilize"category. North Creek North Creek runs through the AUAR study area from north to south along the western half of the area. North Creek is a tributary to the Vermillion River, a designated trout stream, and North Creek is also protected as a tributary of the trout stream. Channel realignment was completed as part of the 195t Street Project. The existing North Creek channel was relocated slightly east of its current location. The relocation was part of a larger channel rehabilitation project designed to improve the ecology of the Creek,and mitigate for the impacts to the Creek from the roadway project. The conversion of the existing straight channel (due to agricultural ditching) into a meandering channel with varying geomorphologic habitat (i.e. pools, runs, etc.) was completed as a part of the roadway project(Figure 10-4). The meandering channel is located under the bridge with the longest span (110 feet) to allow for creek to freely meander. These upgrades are a positive improvement to the overall ecology of the Creek. 23 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 North Creek and its floodplain wetland have been previously identified as a greenway corridor through the City in the City's Surface Water Management Plan and the North Creek Greenway Master Plan approved by the Metropolitan Council in 2012. The City plans to preserve the creek's 100-year floodplain,protect associated wetlands,and promote channel stability to protect the stream and associated natural resources. Ordinances and policies included in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Surface Water Management Plan, Wetland Management Plan and Ordinance,and Shoreline Ordinance will be used to assure protection of this Corridor. Updated Mitigation Plan—Cover Types The goals and strategies that follow are proposed to protect the quality of the natural communities that remain on the Seed/Genstar property as development occurs in the future. Goal 1:Protect the natural communities and habitat connections within the North Creek Greenway Corridor. Protection Strategies: 1. Implement provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Surface Water Management Plan, Wetland Ordinance, and Shoreline Ordinance to protect the natural areas in the North Creek Corridor by prohibiting development within the corridor and floodplain areas, and requiring vegetated buffers along the creek and wetlands in the corridor. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington and private developer. Regulatory Program: Enforcement of City Ordinances and policies. The City may also apply to non-regulatory programs such as DNR's Metro Greenways and Conservation Partners programs to seek funding assistance for protection and restoration of natural communities. Implementation Time Frame: Enforcement of Ordinances and policies will occur with development. 2. The City will support efforts to remove exotic species and restore native vegetation in the buffer areas along North Creek to improve water quality and habitat. Responsible parties: City of Farmington, Natural Resource Agencies, volunteer groups Regulatory program: None. Implementation Time Frame: As grant programs, volunteers,or other resources are available for these efforts. 3. The City will implement the alignment option for the 195th Street Extension recommended in the Feasibility Report for the project(January,2006), and shown 24 Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 in Figure 10-3, including the wetland and floodplain mitigation and banking proposed in the Feasibility Report for the project(January, 2006)to minimize and mitigate for potential impacts to wetlands and floodplains in the project area. Responsible parties: City of Farmington, Natural Resource Agencies, developer and contractors Regulatory program: Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, state and federal floodplain regulations, City Wetland, Floodplain and Stormwater ordinances, NPDES permit. Implementation Time Frame: Mitigation was completed with construction of 195th Street. 4. The City will implement the North Creek Channel Rehabilitation included in the Feasibility Report for the 195th Street Extension project(January,2006),and shown in Figure 10-3 to minimize and mitigate for potential impacts to North Creek and its habitat from the extension of 195th Street. Responsible parties: City of Farmington, Natural Resource Agencies, developer and contractors Regulatory program: DNR permits, City Wetland, Floodplain and Stormwater ordinances,NPDES permit. Implementation Time Frame: Mitigation was completed with construction of 195th Street. Goal 2:Protect healthy individual trees and groves of trees within existing woodland areas, and mitigate for any loss of trees through replanting. Protection Strategies: 1. Implement the vegetation preservation and protection plan and tree preservation requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington and private developers. Regulatory Program: City Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances. Implementation Time Frame: Tree protection plans should be developed along with grading plans for the development. Protection and replacement should occur as the development plan is implemented. Goal 3: Protect wetland resources in the project area to assure no net loss of these resources by avoiding and minimizing wetland impacts when feasible, and mitigating for unavoidable impacts. 25 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Protection Strategies: 1. The developer will follow the requirements of the Farmington Surface Water Management Plan and Wetland Ordinance, and applicable state and federal regulations to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate for impacts to wetlands that result from development. Responsible Parties: Private developers, City of Farmington, and regulatory agencies. Regulatory Program: Farmington Surface Water Management Plan, Wetland Ordinance, Shoreland Ordinance, Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, and Minnesota DNR Protected Waters Program. Implementation Time Frame: Complete analysis of wetland impacts and mitigation needs as final plat and grading plan are completed. Implement efforts to avoid or mitigate for impacts as development occurs. 2. The City will implement the alignment option for the 195th Street Extension recommended in the Feasibility Report for the project(January,2006),and shown in Figure 10-3, including the wetland and floodplain mitigation and banking proposed in the Feasibility Report for the project(January, 2006)to minimize and mitigate for potential impacts to wetlands and floodplains in the project area. Responsible parties: City of Farmington, Natural Resource Agencies, developer and contractors Regulatory program: Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, state and federal floodplain regulations, City Wetland, Floodplain and Stormwater ordinances, NPDES permit. Implementation Time Frame: Mitigation was completed with construction of 195th Street. 3. Site plans will indicate methods that will be used to avoid impacts to wetlands and meet the requirements of the wetland regulations. Required buffers around wetlands will be clearly delineated with permanent monumentation acceptable to the City. In residential subdivisions,a monument is required for each lot. In other situations, a monument is required for each 300 feet of wetland edge. Responsible Parties: Private developer and City of Farmington. Regulatory Program: Same as 1 above. Implementation Time Frame: Wetlands were delineated prior to development. Monuments will be placed as development occurs. 26 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 4. Require the use, management and enforcement of Best Management Practices (BMP's) to control erosion and sedimentation and provide pretreatment of water discharged to wetlands during and after construction, as specified in the City's Surface Water Management Plan. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington. Regulatory Program: City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, Wetland Ordinance, Excavation and Grading Ordinance and Grading Plan Requirements, and NPDES Stormwater Management Program. Implementation Time Frame: Specify BMP's to be used in grading plans, and implement BMP's as development occurs. 27 N ' W / E PEMA P f, i /'\ PE S r B/ i P 'IB _" 1 1 II ii I I I PEMB/ 13/C -- i I I I I I PENl�1/B1 PSS1 B) ' r � I �� i + ipEN..\ � �•• ��\\ \ \ ,��\ , �I PSS,*, j , ��` i Q Study Area Boundary ` • Parcels ►_—'�-1�� ` Land Cover Cropland r----->----\,- B/ - Developed 1 I Dry Grassland }1 • \ \ _ ForestNVoodland S [T� `\ '\ > j� - Grassland Tree Complex -r _v Y �\ Y - � \ o -- Maintained Grasses : \ \ •, \ 11# __-,.-41k.nr P"'d4I :a Wetland /� • ♦ V;* MB/C E Future Land Use 7896 5 ♦ 1,%•�•••,•..- � Low Density G\ ♦i .,i!04.a.•• • o i� ►, PEMB i Low/Medium Density wow \ I i PSS1 Ef 1 Medium Density 16B /'` 195th St W : Mixed Use ' ,'EMA Park/Open Space �� C)P \`\ �� Public/Semi-Public E', " \ /� P B/6 PEMAf • � /I oft low 44, ii Ii \ r /<• t 194th St W -- 414 �i, V 1 ilea rwiik i i1 1._ f [Y Tl.4ii111 d� i _ Atilt alli - III■III122 City of Farmington �oEFrifri f, Seed-Genstar `� StanteC i• _' AUAR-Update Feet \:._.,....."--/' Land Cover and I Proposed Land Use December2016 Figure 10-2 V:\1938\active\193803747\GIS\Projects\ 1,200 1,200 Fig 10-2 Land Cover-Proposed Land Use.mxd / / N / 1 W ---7rE t / ■ / I S / / e -r- a ,i- i-t.■m.■� :.1 • Wetland Impact Summary Table I 4/ '`� Acres Sq.Ft. ■ � ' Impact 1 2.03 88,315 � Impact 2 0.13 5,859 // ��f Total Impacts 2.16 94,174 7, 2:1 Replacement 4.32 188,348 � .,i, ::::' ble On-Site Mitigation Summary Table \ Acres Sq.Ft. \ e" r. 6.19269,636 I I II I t ' \ I :: I®► :T i 4 .I \ .0'-',r/ m . , NI 'i '' i Q b .:1;111Z- -- 1T 43 ' �� \s, Channel RealignmentQ. Q 1� �I uti Impact 2 I Ilin T..11101/4 i Total=0.13 Ac I 'IIIDS`,\1 �i �/I • i �/ ��/� 195th St W IV 4\ ' Impact 1 `� Total=2.03 Ac . r ) . IS T Mitigation Site#1 �4VI '�j / Total=6.19Ac �A l . j /►♦ 194thSt f �/ ,.: i sin „I °,,'LTJ- '\\ i t City of Farmington - . Original Channel N Study Area Boundary oEF Seed-Genstar At Realigned Channel /ti:City Boundary .- ® 100-Year Floodplain Ai!Railroad AUAR-Update Iiia Proposed Wetland Impacts/V Parcel Base Map Bonestroo �'�.....s/ 195th Street Wetland um Proposed Mitigation Areas Feet I Impacts and Mitigation June 2011 Figure 10-3 K:\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\ ,2QQ Q ,2QQ Fig 10-3 Wetland Impacts-Mitigation Plan.mxd 1 N / / 1 W E / PEMAf, . PEMC I S ■ 3 7 , . .•....... �i��I`� .� / / / �i / `. \ 11 1 1 1-1 I,ri folv-dft \ 1 ib , 1 1 .t: t" \ sg rE ,.,% ��f c 3� /• � \ Realigned Channel Q. _El 5 Illi_,_ ---t-' 4•A ___. --.11T,. .1111.. 4.r/I �/�;% - � i�93th SSS_ / - 4 /r�� BAridge Li Original Channel l'i��`, SIT ti -; all ' '''' ' -- 400A . ndr; City of Farmington Original Channel N Study Area Boundary F� r Seed-Genstar N Realigned Channel /p`City Boundary 4. ti AUAR-Update ® 100-Year Floodplain Jit Railroad Bonestroo ''�..� Completed I I Bridge /V Parcel Base Map Feet 1 Channel Rehabilitation June 2011 Figure 10 4 K:\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\ ,2QQ 0 1,200 Fig 10-4 Channel Rehabilitation.mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 11. Fish, Wildlife and Sensitive Resources a. Describe fish and wildlife resources on or near the site and discuss how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. The description of wildlife and fish resources should be related to the habitat types depicted on the cover type maps (of item 10). Any differences in impacts between development scenarios should be highlighted in the discussion. Fish Resources The Vermillion River and its tributary, North Creek, are the most significant fishery resources in the study area. Most of the study area drains to North Creek. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) has designated part of the Vermillion River and its tributaries, including a portion of North Creek at the south end of the AUAR area, as trout waters. Channel realignment was completed as a part of the 195th Street project. This relocation has been part of a larger channel rehabilitation project designed to improve the ecology of the Creek,and mitigate for the impacts to the Creek. The conversion of the existing straight channel (due to agricultural ditching) into a meandering channel with varying geomorphologic habitat (i.e. pools, runs, etc.) was completed as a part of the roadway project (Figure 10-4). The meandering channel is located under bridge with the longest span(110 feet)to allow for creek to freely meander. The final mitigation for 195th Street should result in improvement to the fishery habitat of North Creek compared to its current condition. The 2004 AUAR and the City's Comprehensive Plan proposes a potential extension of Diamond Path Road through the AUAR area. While Diamond Path is included in the AUAR, City Staff will continue to review the feasibility of the road as this project moves forward. Wildlife Resources Wildlife habitat value is dependent on the composition,quality and connectivity of natural communities including woodlands,wetlands and grasslands. The City and Dakota County have identified the North Creek Corridor as an important greenway/habitat corridor within the study area. The corridor is noted in the City's Wetland Management Plan and in the County's Farmland and Natural Area Protection Plan. The Surface Water Management Plan,Wetland Ordinance, and Shoreline Ordinance include policies to protect the corridor and its resources. The completed alignment of 195th Street extension improves connectivity within the North Creek Corridor, in comparison to use of culvert-type crossings. Most of the native habitat and connectivity in the study area east of the North Creek Corridor and Canadian Pacific Railroad tracks has been lost due to agricultural and rural 31 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 residential development. As noted in the "Cover Types" section, above, several isolated areas of degraded natural communities (woodlands and wetlands) remain in the eastern half of the study area. The North Creek Corridor and its connection to the Vermillion River are the most significant habitat areas and connections for the AUAR study area. The County Natural Areas plan indicates that the University of Minnesota (U of M) Rosemount Research Center area is several miles to the northeast of the site. No clear habitat connections are available between the AUAR area and this site, and Highway 3 and intervening land uses pose significant barriers to wildlife movement between the North Creek Corridor and the Rosemount Research Center. The proposed development will have no identifiable impacts on the U of M site or other Natural Areas identified in the County's plan. The City's Surface Water Management Plan, Wetland Buffers Ordinance, and Shoreline Ordinance contain requirements for protection of natural communities within the North Creek Corridor,maintenance and restoration of corridor connections,and requirements for wetland and stream buffers to protect the connectivity of the corridor and its role in providing wildlife habitat. b. Are there any state-listed endangered, threatened, or special-concern species; rare plant communities; colonial waterbird nesting colonies; native prairie or other rare habitats;or other sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? X Yes—Near the site. The Minnesota County Biological Survey identified no rare or threatened species in the AUAR study area during their countywide inventory. Based upon a review of the MDNR Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS database) under license agreement LA-760, there are no known records of state-listed species within the AUAR study area. However, the review Indicated there are three known occurrences of rare species and natural communities within one mile of the AUAR study area. These include: • Loggerhead shrikes (Lanius Iudovlcianus) were observed northeast of the AUAR area as recently as 2012. • Wet meadow natural community on North Creek, upstream of the AUAR area • Areas to the west of the AUAR area have been designated by the MDNR as the lowest designation(i.e., "Below")of Site of Biodiversity Significance. In addition, a previously state-listed plant species, Cowbane (Oxypolis rigidior) was observed In 1992 near North Creek, upstream of the AUAR area. Loggerhead shrikes live in areas of upland grasslands and sometimes in agricultural areas, where short grass vegetation and perching sites such as hedgerows, shrubs, and small trees are found. They occur in both native and non-native grasslands, including native prairie, pastures, old fields, shelterbelts, farmyards, and cemeteries. Based on the land cover present,the AUAR area may contain suitable habitat for this species. The information provided by the MDNR on shrike habitat will be provided to the developer. The development will include some large infiltration basins with native grass and shrub habitat (See analysis and Mitigation Plan items in Section 17), and these will maintain potential shrub habitat in the area as development occurs. The wetland/wet 32 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 meadow resources identified are upstream of the AUAR area, and unlikely to be affected by development within the area. Federally Listed Threatened and Endanaered Species Per a review of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service's(USFWS's) Endangered Species websites, there are three federally listed species with a geographic range including Dakota County: • Higgins eye peariymussel(Lampsilis higginsi!)-Endangered • Northern long-eared bat(Myotis septentrionalls)-Threatened • Prairie bush clover(Lespedeza leptostachya)-Threatened The Higgins eye peariymussel is known to occur within the Mississippi River in Minnesota. The Mississippi River is not located in or near the AUAR study area,and therefore no Impacts to this species or its habitat will occur. Prairie bush clover was listed as threatened by the USFWS to February 1988 and is known to occur in dry to mesic prairies with gravelly soil. Given the predominance of agriculture in the AUAR study area and that prairie bush clover require undisturbed, high-quality prairie or wetland habitat,it is unlikely that the AUAR study area provides suitable habitat for this species. In the winter,northern long-eared bat(NLEB)hibernate in large caves and mines that have large passages and entrances, constant temperatures, and high humidity with no air currents.No caves or structures are present within the AUAR study area that would provide suitable winter habitat for this species. In the spring, summer and fall, NLEB use a wide variety of forested habitats for roosting, foraging and traveling,and may also utilize some adjacent and interspersed non-forested habitat such as emergent wetlands and edges of fields.This species has also been found roosting in structures like barns and sheds (particularly when suitable tree roosts are unavailable;USFWS 2016b). Roosting habitat Includes forested areas with live trees and/or snags with a diameter at breast height(dbh) of at least three Inches with exfoliating bark, cracks, crevices and/or other cavities. Trees are considered suitable roost trees If they meet those requirements and are located within 1,000 feet of another suitable roost tree, woodlot, or wooded fencerow (USFWS 2016b). Maternity habitat is defined as suitable summer habitat that is used by Juveniles and reproductive females.After hibernation ends in late March or early April, most NLEB migrate to summer roosts.The NLEB active season is the period between emergence and hibernation from April 1 -October 31 (USFWS 2016b). Woodland in and near the AUAR study area was assessed for bat summer habitat suitability (i.e.,non-winter) using published literature on home range size(Owen et al.20033,Carter and Feldhamer 20054,Lacki et al.20095)and USFWS guidance on the NLEB(USFWS 2016b). 2 United States Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS).2016a.County Distribution of Federally-Listed Threatened,Endangered, Proposed,and Candidate Species.http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/lists/minnesot-cty.html.Website accessed November 4, 2016. 'Owen,S.F.,M.A.Menzel,W.M.Ford,B.R Chapman,K.V.Miller,J.W.Edwards,and P.B.Wood.2003.Home-range size and habitat used by the Northern Myotis(Myotis septentrionalis).American Midland Naturalist.150:352-359. 4 Carter,T.C.,and G.A.Feldhamer.2005.Roost tree use by maternity colonies of Indiana bats and northern long-eared bats in southern Illinois.Forest Ecology and Management 219:259-268. 'Lacki,M.J.,D.R.Cox,and M.B.Dickinson.2009.Meta-analysis of summer roosting characteristics of two species of Myotis bats. American Midland Naturalist 162:318-326. 33 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 The wooded riparian corridor along North Creek may provide suitable summer habitat for the NLEB(i.e.,>15 acres of trees with <1,000 feet connectivity). In addition, little is known about the migration patterns of bats, specifically how they disperse across the landscape during migration.Therefore,it is not possible to accurately predict an individual bat's route during migration. Based on this, NLEB have the potential to exist anywhere within the species' geographic range, including the trees within the AUAR study area. Direct mortality from collision with construction equipment for future development is unlikely given that construction activities will occur during daylight hours when bats would not be active.However,tree clearing within the AUAR study area may indirectly affect the NLEB.Per a review of the USFWS's White-Nose Syndrome(WNS)Zone map dated August 31, 20166, Dakota County,Minnesota is located within 150 miles of a location where WNS has been detected. Therefore, the AUAR study area falls within the WNS buffer zone per the Final 4(d) Rule under the Endangered Species Act(ESA). For areas within the WNS buffer zone, the incidental take (e.g., the harm, harassment or killing of a bat as a side effect of otherwise lawful actions, like tree clearing) from tree removal activities is not prohibited unless 1) it results in removing a known occupied maternity roost tree,2)If tree removal activities occur within 150 feet of a known occupied maternity roost tree from June 1 through July 31, or 3)tree removal activities occur within 0.25 mile of a hibemaculum at any time.Tree removal activities may then proceed without a permit and there is no need to contact the USFWS. Due diligence is generally required to determine if a maternity roost tree or a hibemaculum is on the property;however,per the Final 4(d) Rule,private landowners are not required to conduct surveys on their lands. In Minnesota, the MDNR maintains records of maternity roost trees or a hibernaculum within its NHIS database. Based upon a guidance document issued by the MNDNR and the USFWS on April 1,20167, there are two known NLEB records from Dakota County; however, these records are not located in the same Township as the AUAR study area (i.e.,Township 114 North, Range 19 West, Sections 7, 18 and 19). As there are no records of NLEB maternity roost trees or a hibemaculum within the AUAR study area or a 0.25-mile buffer,incidental take of NLEB as a result of tree removal activities is not prohibited under the Final 4(d) Rule under the ESA. Miaratory Birds Construction activities and development within the AUAR study area have the potential to impact birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The MBTA makes it illegal for anyone to take (i.e., to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct) any migratory bird, or the parts, nests, or eggs of such a bird except under the terms of a valid permit issued pursuant to Federal regulations. Under the MBTA,construction activities in grassland,roadsides,wetland,riparian(stream), shrubland,or woodland habitats that would otherwise result in the taking of migratory birds, USFWS.2016c.White-Nose Syndrome Zone Around WNS/Pd Positive Counties/Districts. http://www.fws.gov/Midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/pdf/WNSZone.pdf August 31,2016. 7 MDNR and USFWS.2016.Townships Containing Northern Long-eared Bat Roost Trees and/or Hibemacula. http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/ereview/minnesota nleb township list and map 20150604.pdf.April 1,2016. 34 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 eggs,young and/or active nests should be avoided. Although the provisions of the MBTA are applicable throughout the entire year,most migratory bird nesting activity in Minnesota occurs approximately from mid-March to August 15,per the MDNR8. According to the USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) Database', there are 20 migratory birds of concern with the potential to occur within the AUAR study area. Updated Mitigation Plan Goal 1. Protect the natural areas and habitat connections in the North Creek Greenway and the water quality and habitat in North Creek as development occurs in the AUAR area,through the strategies identified in Section 10 above and Section 17. Avoiding or minimizing impacts to these areas will help mitigate impacts on wildlife species and migratory birds. Goal 2. Minimize impacts to unmaintained grassland areas within the AUAR area as much as possible to limit impacts to loggerheads shrikes and their habitat. The information provided by the MDNR on shrike habitat will be provided to the developer. Goal 3. Construction activities in grasslands, roadsides, shrubiands, wetlands, or woodlands (natural habitats) within the AUAR study area may result in the taking of migratory birds, eggs, young and/or active nests. If rare or state-listed species are determined to be present in a field study conducted within the year prior to development, removal of vegetation in natural habitat will occur outside of the anticipated migratory bird nesting window in Minnesota(i.e.,mid-March to August 15)to minimize the potential take of migratory birds. Goal 4. Best management practices during construction activities and operation within the AUAR study area will be implemented to minimize the introduction or spread of noxious weeds and invasive species at the site,especially along the North Creek Greenway. 8 MDNR.2014.Best Practices for Meeting DNR GP 2004-0001 (version 4,October 2014). htto://files.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt section/owpermits/gp 2004 0001 chapter] odf. 9 USFWS.2016d.Information for Planning and Conservation Database. httos://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/projectNVSUSHDPSRH3VEFQEIW25OV7L4/resources.Website accessed November 4,2016. 35 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration (dredging,filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, impoundment)of any surface water (lake,pond, wetland, stream, drainage ditch)? XYes No If yes, idents the water resource to be affected and describe:the alteration, including the construction process; volumes of dredged orfill material;area affected; length of stream diversion;water surface area affected;timing and extent offluctuations in water surface elevations;spoil disposal sites;and proposed mitigation to minimize impacts. Water resources in the AUAR study area include North Creek and a variety of wetland types. It is anticipated that construction,creation of impervious surfaces and development of utilities and infrastructure will impact some of the wetlands in the study area. Potential Wetland Impacts-2016 AUAR Update No changes in potential impacts identified for the 2016 AUAR Update compared to the 2011 AUAR Update.As the AUAR area develops,wetlands will be protected in accordance with the wetland classifications and management plan in the City's 2008 Local Surface Water Management Plan as well as watershed and State requirements. Potential Wetland Impacts-2011 AUAR Update Since the 2006 Update the two-lane segment of 195th Street was completed in 2009 providing the necessary east/west connection to TH3. The selected alignment was chosen by the City in part because it minimizes impacts to wetlands and the floodplain in comparison to other potential alignments. Wetland mitigation measures have been completed with the roadway construction as shown in Figure 10-3. Figure 10-3 displays the area of wetland and floodplain mitigation completed for the construction of 195th Street. A single wetland mitigation area of over six (6) acres was constructed at the same time as 195th Street rather than multiple smaller mitigation sites. This single site exceeds the total mitigation area needed for this project. The 2004 AUAR and the City's Comprehensive Plan proposes a potential extension of Diamond Path Road through the AUAR area. While Diamond Path is included in the AUAR, City Staff will continue to review the feasibility of the road as this project moves forward. Potential Wetland Impacts-2006 AUAR Update The City completed a wetland inventory and functions and values assessment of all wetlands in the City as a part of its Surface Water Management Plan. Wetlands were classified in 4 classes based on their plan community characteristics and susceptibility to 36 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 stormwater impacts. The highest quality wetlands (Protect classification) receive the highest protection, while lower classes (Manage 1, Manage 2, and Utilize) receive lower protection. The City subsequently adopted a Wetland Ordinance that establishes the protection requirements for each wetland class, including buffers. Classifications shown on Figure 17-1 are consistent with the City's plan, and City policies and ordinances will be applied in the AUAR area as development occurs. The highest concentration of wetland in the AUAR study area is along the North Creek corridor. These wetlands have been classified as Manage 2 wetlands in the City's Wetland Management Plan. Several smaller wetland areas are scattered throughout the site. Two wetlands are classified as"Protect"and another wetland is classified as"Manage 1." The remaining wetland areas are classified in the manage 2 and Utilize categories. Wetland buffer requirements for the wetlands in the City include the following: Table 12.1 Farmington Wetland Buffer Requirements Wetland Type: Protect Manage I Manage 2 Utilize Average Buffer Width 75 ft. 50.ft. 2511. 0 ft. 100 ft.—"protect"wetlands in a designated trout stream corridor—applies to all wetlands in the AUAR area Structure Setback from Outer Edge Of Buffer 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 0 ft. The City requires pretreatment of runoff before it enters wetlands, and requires management of stormwater"bounce"to protect wetland vegetation and habitat. The degree of wetland protection is based on wetland quality, as identified in the functions and values assessment and wetland classification completed by the City. The City's Surface Water Management Plan and Ordinances will be implemented in the AUAR area to avoid, minimize and mitigate for impacts to wetlands anticipated from the proposed development. North Creek North Creek runs through the AUAR study area from north to south along the western half of the area. North Creek is a tributary to the Vermillion River, a designated trout stream, and North Creek is also protected as a tributary of the trout stream. Potential North Creek Impacts 2016 AUAR Update No changes in potential impacts identified for the 2016 AUAR Update compared to the 2011 AUAR Update. As the AUAR area develops, water resources will be managed in accordance with the City's 2008 Local Surface Water Management Plan as well as watershed and State requirements. 37 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 2011 AUAR Update. Channel realignment has been completed as part of the 195th Street Project. The existing North Creek channel has been relocated slightly east of its current location. The relocation was part of a larger channel rehabilitation project designed to improve the ecology of the Creek, and mitigate for the impacts to the Creek. The conversion of the existing straight channel(due to agricultural ditching)into a meandering channel with varying geomorphologic habitat (i.e. pools, runs, etc.) was completed as a part of the roadway project(Figure 10-4). The meandering channel is located under bridge with the longest span (110 feet)to allow for creek to freely meander. These upgrades are a positive improvement to the overall ecology of the Creek. Protection Strategies under Sections 10, 11, 16 and 17 will be implemented to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts on the Water Resources in the study area. The 2004 AUAR and the City's Comprehensive Plan also proposes a potential extension of Diamond Path Road through the AUAR area. While Diamond Path is included in the AUAR, City Staff will continue to review the feasibility of the road as this project moves forward. Section 17 of this Draft AUAR provides an analysis of potential stormwater impacts to North Creek due to development proposed in the AUAR study area, and identifies standards and protection strategies to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate for these potential impacts Mitigation Plan-2016 AUAR Update No changes in mitigation plan strategies for the 2016 AUAR Update compared to the 2011 AUAR Update.As the AUAR area develops,wetlands and water resources will be protected and managed in accordance with the City's 2008 Local Surface Water Management Plan as well as watershed and State requirements. Stormwater BMPs will be Implemented to satisfy City,watershed,and State requirements. BMPs will be designed In accordance with the recently-adopted NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall amounts and distributions. Such BMPs could include stormwater storage for rate control;infiltration,filtration, bloretention or stormwater reuse for volume control and water quality treatment;and temporary erosion and sediment control features such as vegetative restoration, storm drain inlet protection, construction entrance protection,and silt fence. Mitigation Plan Protection Strategies under Sections 10, 11, 16 and 17 will be implemented to avoid, minimize,or mitigate impacts on the Water Resources in the study area. These include the wetland mitigation described in Sections 10 and 12 of this AUAR Update. The Vermillion River Watershed Management Plan notes that North Creek is fed by shallow ground water flows. The infiltration and wetland protection strategies proposed in Sections 10, 11 and 17 should help to maintain shallow ground water resources in the AUAR area. In addition,the following strategies are included: Goal 1. Protect ground water resources that support flows in North Creek. 38 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Protection Strategies: 1. Avoid construction of utilities in close proximity to North Creek when feasible. When utility construction near the creek is necessary,require use of trench dams or other barriers, and backfilling of utility trenches with native material to prevent drainage of shallow groundwater in the area. 2. The City will consider the use of directional boring techniques in the construction of water distribution and sanitary sewer collection lines that are proposed to cross under North Creek. Responsible parties: City of Farmington Regulatory program: MPCA Best Management Practices Implementation time frame: Implement as utilities are constructed in the AUAR area. 39 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 13. Water Use a. Will the project involve the installation or abandonment of any wells? X Yes No For abandoned wells, give the location and unique well number. For new wells, or other Previously unpermitted wells, give the location and purpose of the well and the Unique Well Number(if known). With respect to b and c, below, if the area requires new water supply wells, specific information about that appropriation and its potential impacts on groundwater levels should be given; if groundwater levels would be affected, any impacts resulting on other resources should be addressed. With respect to possible individual appropriations by future projects, a general assessment of the likely need for such should be indicated, and if there is potential for major appropriations or environmental issues resulting from individual appropriations, a more detailed assessment of those should be included along with a discussion of mitigation for potential problems. b. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water (including dewatering)? X Yes_No Ifyes, indicate the source, quantity, duration,purpose of the appropriation, and DNR water appropriation permit number of any existing appropriation. Discuss the impact of the appropriation on ground water levels. 2016 AUAR Update—Changes reflect updated projections on municipal water use and wells needed to accommodate that use,and closure of active wells since the 2011 Update. The City of Farmington currently has eight municipal wells(seven active and one standby) designed to meet the City's existing water supply demands. Two active and one standby well are located in the older portion of Farmington,near the Main Street area. Five wells are located west-southwest of the AUAR study area, all within 0.3 miles of Pilot Knob Road. For the AUAR study area,water supply trunks will be added to connect the project area to the current water supply system. These trunks will range in diameter from 16 inches to 20 inches. A 5.0 million gallon ground storage water reservoir is also planned near the high elevation point in the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 18 (Township 114N,Range 19W).This ground storage reservoir is primarily intended to expand the City's water storage capacity to accommodate for peak demand as the community grows. Ultimately, the size of this future storage facility may be adjusted based on actual community growth. Figure 13-1 shows the proposed layout of the future water supply trunks and the ground storage reservoir. 40 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Development of the AUAR study area will require an appropriation of groundwater, chiefly for potable water supply. The source of the supply will be the City of Farmington's current municipal wells completed in the Prairie du Chien-Jordan Aquifer. The DNR water appropriations permit number for Farmington is 1959-0725. Currently,the City's wells are each capable of yields averaging 1,000-1,500 gallons per minute(gpm). While each well may yield at least 1000 gpm,the use of each well is not constant, so the average daily discharge for each well is considerably less. Currently,the wells are used on a rotation schedule since the water demand rarely requires that all wells be activated simultaneously. Development of the AUAR study area will likely require additional pumping of the City's current wells to meet Increased demand,with new wells to be added periodically to accommodate overall growth of the City.These planned system modifications will be capable of meeting the anticipated changes in demand.In the year 2015,the City pumped 645 million gallons. Projected demands for the year 2020 are 1002 million gallons,while projected demands for the year 2025 are 1104 million gallons.Actual water usage will depend on actual rate of growth, along with other factors that influence demand,such the fluctuations in precipitation and the effectiveness of water conservation measures.In order to maintain firm capacity to meet expected water demands,the City expects to add Well 9 in the year 2020 and Well 10 in the year 2025. The effect of pumping generally results in lower groundwater levels in the Prairie du Chien-Jordan Aquifer while the wells are operating. The performance of the City's current wells indicates that the aquifer is highly permeable and able to handle the additional pumping.Therefore,while the City's current wells will experience a gradual increase in pumping over the coming years,the aquifer is able to provide the additional withdrawals for the City wells.An aquifer-pumping test at the Farmington Well 7 site demonstrated that the potentiometric level of the aquifer dropped 23 feet after pumping the well 1600gpm over a 24-hour period.After pumping ceased,the water level in the well returned to with 95%of its static level in approximately 3 hours.An observed well influence(drawdown) of 3 feet was measured at a distance of 2000 feet from Well 7(at Well 6). While most domestic wells in this part of the county are completed in the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer, it is unlikely that pumping from the current City wells will have a significant impact on domestic wells in or around the project area due to the low levels of drawdown observed at these wells. A search of the Minnesota Geological Survey's County Well Index for Dakota County indicates no well records for active wells within the boundary of the project area. Two sealed wells were identified within the AUAR study area, but those wells no longer pose a threat to development or to the aquifers)that served those wells. Since the County Well Index only identifies wells that have been assigned a unique identification number,It is possible that some of the properties currently within the AUAR study area could still have unsealed wells that haven't been located or identified. The previous AUAR identified four potential properties on the west side of State Highway 3 that could potentially contain wells. Three of these properties have since had the homes and buildings removed. Two wells were sealed at the 41 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 time,with unique numbers 270116 and 270304.One former farmstead on the north end of the project area has had a home removed, but two farm buildings still remain.It is unknown whether a well exists at this property.Figure 13-2 shows these four properties that had sealed wells or may have existing or abandoned wells that are not yet sealed. Since this area has historically been used for farming and rural residences, it is possible that other wells are located in this area that are not accounted for. The possibility exists that unsealed, abandoned wells may be encountered after construction begins. In that event,those wells will have to be properly sealed and abandoned to meet codes required by Dakota County. Mitigation Plan Goal 1. Protect the quality of ground water in the AUAR area. Protection Strategies 1. Require that unsealed, abandoned wells are properly sealed and abandoned to meet codes required by Dakota County. Responsible parties: City of Farmington, private developer and property owners Regulatory program: Dakota County Implementation time frame: As development occurs. 42 N / I W \ f' E / II!S / 1 Is / 1 3 • ,,‘N N\ 'I( '' ›) \ \ GROUND �. STORAGE 4.0MG 11111/ _ ---\ \\ I' -�\ \ - �1'• I1 �, �� a�i La 1 co ic I sir \-- \\ a \ U ss 11 as 11► \ , \ 11111 \' a SthstW ; _ _ \ �,- • N - .7_1_ / \ _ SCI i % � � ��� . _� -'7;A/ ..0 ! I ,i III ;i , ,, � -:— i City of Farmington u Proposed Water Storage Reservoir 4okti,•14" ‘ Seed-GenstarAt Proposed Water Main A/Study Area Boundary /• AUAR-Update 'City Boundary Bonestroo Feet Trunk Water System Al Railroad �^•..�-� /\/Parcel Base Map Figure 13-1 June 2011 1,200 0 1,200 K\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\Fig 13-1 Trunk Water System.mxd / / N / W \ 7 3 S /� I Old Farmstead Home Removed i • f JFormer Home Removed OP Well 270304 Sealed 0 1Jlll A 1111111* `i--, co 4uuu11k Q.V Former Farm with ,.,.t \ 2 Houses Removed P. . \ Well 270116 Sealed 0111/040,i \ • IIJJI 4 \ lull 1 N I \ \ 1'5th St I I Unoccupied Home& i I/ _ C) \ Farm Removed �� PPS \ Ilii `�-///7 tair 41 I& _ rill,,,,`itt, 1:4 �: • J ♦i♦iIve aftal I* °/ r .L.._.. _...A \ 0 irl'issik■ ir► 4■����������e► : �'''_ pima ■I1 114 I 4, �i • _ \ ■■■■■■�1■■\ a1 �1 City of Farmington Q Possible Well Location A!Railroad AlkRiiit Seed-Genstar Q Historic Well Location /\/Parcel Base Map a' Stantec i`— i' A/Study Area Boundary 10 foot Contour AUAR-Update 2016 `ham City Boundary Feet \'..-..-' Possible Well Locations 1 I Figure 13-2 November2016 1,200 0 1,200 V:\1938\active\193803747\GIS\Projects\Fig 13-2 Possible Well Locations.mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 14. Water-Related Land Use Management Districts Does any part of the project site involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100 year flood plain, or a state and federally designated wild and scenic river land use district? X Yes No If yes, idents the district and discuss the compatibility of the project with the land use restrictions of the district. Such districts should be delineated on appropriate maps and the land use restrictions applicable in those districts should be described. If any variances or deviations from these restrictions within the AUAR are envisioned, this should be discussed The project area includes a shoreland zoning district and 100-year flood plain along North Creek. The City adopted a Shoreland Ordinance on July 15, 2002 that is consistent with the DNR's Model Ordinance, and has adopted regulations related to floodplain management. The City's floodplain regulations require 2 feet of freeboard, floodway protection, compensatory storage for any fill within the floodplain, and easements. The City's Shoreland Ordinance and Floodplain regulations will be applied within the designated shoreland and floodplain areas along North Creek. Flood Plain and Shoreland Zoning District-2016 AUAR Update No changes in project compatibility with flood plain and shoreland zoning district for the 2016 AUAR Update compared to the 2011 AUAR Update. 2011 AUAR Update—Floodplain Since the 2006 Update the two-lane segment of 195th Street was completed in 2009 providing the necessary east/west connection to TH 3. The selected alignment was chosen by the City in part because it minimizes impacts to wetlands and the floodplain in comparison to other potential alignments. Mitigation measure have been completed with the roadway construction as shown in Figure 10-3. Figure 10-3 displays the area of wetland and floodplain mitigation completed for the construction of 195t Street. A single wetland mitigation area of over six (6) acres was constructed at the same time as 195t Street rather than multiple smaller mitigation sites. This single site exceeds the total mitigation area needed for this project. The 2004 AUAR and the City's Comprehensive Plan proposes a potential extension of Diamond Path Road through the AUAR area. While Diamond Path is included in the AUAR, City Staff will continue to review the feasibility of the road as this project moves forward. 45 N W f1 I t '1 t S i 1 1 • 1 i Pit �, L • ,� is L .'ri 'fid iQ I4 4¢ Channel Realignment 4 _ ' . P---.. ' -MUM it ' IN • it �� 195th St W � ' 7747 ` *.. s 14 0 ' V r ....".„.. !i 1 0 , . w `tel J � ' %' al 4ii / f/1" � 1 4 .St W1 ,G f�.;•144, , i \\ 6.10, Mira . ,li ,. '10 Iroi '' Ja f11 1 ?. 4 ♦ e , , ounce = Digital lobe,GeoEye. Earthstar Geographies.CNES/Airbus i ',S4 1 ® ,. I r 11 r ; Eli - ' II DS USDA,USGS,AEX,Getmapping,Aerogrid IGN, IGP swisstopo and ,� a -,,, �a"i, ;_. .,.;4 14111111,Pnr A \ the-GIS User Community '47 .� >� �AA�rrt.P*�.r ..� '..�%i/iii,- � � �i.t�m•�► Anef Original Channel N Study Area Boundary City of Farmington N Realigned Channel A:City Boundary *1/444,,,kiiiikt, Seed-Genstar 100-Year Floddplain A/Railroad 5+ StantecAUAR-U date ® Proposed Wetland Impacts Parcel Base Map p Proposed Mitigation Areas %//Shoreland District Feet Floodplain Areas January 2017 1 I Figure 14-1 V:\1938\active\193803747\GIS\Projects\ 1,200 0 1,200 Fig 14-1 Floodplain Areas.mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 15. Water Surface Use Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body. Yes X No Ifyes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other users or fish and wildlife resources. This item need only be addressed if the AUAR area would include or adjoin recreational water bodies. No changes in water surface use since the 2011 AUAR Update. 16. Erosion and Sedimentation a. Describe any steep slopes or highly erodable soils and idents them on the site map. Describe the erosion and sedimentation measures to be used during and after construction of the project. The number of acres to be graded and number of cubic yards of soil to be moved need not be given; instead, a general discussion of the likely earthmoving needs for development of the area should be given, with an emphasis on unusual or problem areas. In discussing mitigation measures, both the standard requirements of local ordinances and any special measures that would be added for AUAR purposes should be included Erosion and Sedimentation 2016 AUAR Update No changes in erosion and sedimentation issues for the AUAR study area compared to the 2011 AUAR Update. As the AUAR study area develops,temporary erosion and sediment control features will be implemented to satisfy City, watershed, and State requirements. Such features could include vegetative restoration, storm drain inlet protection, construction entrance protection,and silt fence. Map 16-1 indicates that an area of steep slopes is present through the middle portion of the AUAR study area. City standards and requirements for erosion control, as well as those of other permitting organizations,will be enforced in the AUAR area. Mitigation Plan Goal 1. Minimize erosion and sedimentation and impacts on surface waters as development occurs. Protection strategies: 1. Identify and protect areas of existing native vegetation, and minimize soil exposure during development. 2. Use created storm water ponds as sediment basins during construction. 47 Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 3. Implement the City's Erosion Control and Turf Establishment Ordinance. Work with the grading contractor to ensure that these practices are implemented, and that contractors follow the City's erosion and sediment control requirements. 4. Implement the Additional BMP's included in the MPCA's NPDES Permit for Special Waters(August,2003). 5. Employ inspectors on site to ensure that Best Management Practices and City Ordinances are implemented. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington,private developers. Regulatory Program: City Ordinances, and Grading Plan Requirements. Implementation Time Frame: Developer approach and use of BMP's should be specified in grading plan. Adoption and enforcement of BMP's should occur throughout the development process. 48 N 1 W �- E -• SI • 3 31 NMI•. • • I i . • I 'I j \ ‘;\ 4 \lijill? - 1,, ir I LI i[1-7_114-[.. \ \ r ?, ' v :\:: :\ ' f8 C� 91 \ U th (, \ \ J7Li_T L � y \\ -- t W \ �/ 7:2 \\ i .. i /' '\ ri ; :// • 494th St W-- _*' ' i s ----M _ , ;,; , . i 1 WO 0111 • \ ---4 ,c,;\,,v,././ ,f \ H ____J . 1 1 TT , 7 : ,(,,,ILTPITITTITT \-7' 'p\t\'.- • Slopes 12%-20% City of Farmington - Slopes 20%+ Al. .6.6% 4 /4„ Seed-Genstar A/ Study Proposed Water Main ,_� �= AUAR-Update ,v CitydBound Boundary Bonestroo �'�-.✓ ~ y Feet Steep Slopes Railroad /\/ Parcel Base Map 1 Figure 16-1 June 2011 1,200 0 1,200 K:\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\Fig 16-1 Steep Slopes mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 17. Water Quality–Surface Water Runoff It is expected that the AUAR will have a detailed analysis of stormwater issues. A map of the proposed stormwater management system and of the water bodies that will receive stormwater should be provided; The description of the stormwater system should idents on-site and "regional" detention ponding and also indicate whether the various ponds will be new water bodies or converted existing ponds or wetlands. Where on-site ponds will be used but have not yet been designed, the discussion should indicate the design standards that will be followed The following types of water bodies must be given special analysis: Lakes:within the Twin Cities metro area a nutrient budget analysis must be prepared for any "priority lake" identified by the Metropolitan Council. Outside of the metro area, lakes needing a nutrient budget analysis must be determined by consultation with the MPCA and DNR staffs; Trout Streams: if storm water discharges will enter or affect a trout stream an evaluation of the impacts on the chemical composition and temperature regime of the stream and the consequent impacts on the trout population(and other species of concern)must be included; Surface Water Runoff Impacts—No changes in surface water runoff impacts Identified for the 2016 AUAR Update compared to the 2011 AUAR Update. As the AUAR area develops, surface water runoff will be managed in accordance with the City's 2008 Local Surface Water Management Plan as well as watershed and State requirements. Figure 17-1 has been updated to reflect the 2008 Plan;the narrative below regarding subwatersheds has been updated accordingly. Stormwater BMPs will be implemented to satisfy City, watershed, and State requirements. BMPs will be designed in accordance with the recently-adopted NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall amounts and distributions. Such BMPs could include stormwater storage for rate control;infiltration,filtration,bioretention,or stormwater reuse for volume control and water quality treatment;and temporary erosion and sediment control features such as vegetative restoration, storm drain Inlet protection, construction entrance protection,and silt fence. The project area is located within the watershed of the Vermillion River and directly adjacent to North Creek, a tributary that joins the mainstem of the Vermillion River approximately one mile downstream of the project area in the City of Farmington. Both the Vermillion River and North Creek have been designated as trout waters under State Rules. This portion of the North Creek drainage lies entirely within Planning Unit 1 designated in the Vermillion River Watershed Management Plan preliminary draft (August 1999). Summarized data for both North Creek and that portion of the Vermillion River where North Creek joins it are presented in Table 17-1. 50 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Table 17-1 River/Creek Watershed Area Mean Discharge Period of Record North Creek' Vermilion River2 82,500 acres 67.5 cfs 1974—2000 'Monitoring location is 2 Monitoring location is near Empire,MN Assessment Objectives The objective of this analysis was to provide guidance on the mitigation measures necessary to protect North Creek from increases in runoff volume as well as chemical and thermal loads. At the time that the stormwater analysis was first completed for this AUAR(Fall,2002), the agencies involved in the AUAR process supported application of a proposed standard by the Minnesota PCA that is proposed for areas tributary to that portion of the Vermillion River mainstem to which the Empire wastewater treatment plant discharges. This standard is expected to be adopted in March 2003. The standard that guided the stormwater analysis for this AUAR is as follows: To keep the runoff volume under ultimate development conditions from exceeding the event runoff volume under pre-development(existing land cover) conditions for design rainfall events up to the 10 year 24-hour event. Meeting this standard for the AUAR study area is expected to provide adequate protection to North Creek regarding runoff volume,thermal loads,and other runoff- driven pollutants. In August,2003,the MPCA Board adopted a different standard for stormwater management that will be applied in the AUAR study area. The new requirements are described in the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Permit Program. The standard applies to discharges to all Special Waters of the state,and includes the following requirements: • The water quality volume that must be treated by the project's permanent storm water management system shall be one(1) inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. • An undisturbed buffer zone of not less than 1001inear feet from the special water (not including tributaries)shall be maintained at all times.This is the same buffer requirement as the Farmington Surface Water Management Plan requires for trout streams and trout stream wetlands. • The permanent storm water management system must be designed such that the pre and post project runoff rate and volume from the 1 and 2-year 24-hour precipitation events remains the same. 51 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 • Projects that discharge to trout streams must minimize the impact of increase in temperature using one or more of the following measures, or a combination of measures, in order of preference: o Minimize new impervious surfaces o Minimize the discharge from connected impervious surfaces by discharging to vegetated areas or grass swales,and through the use of other non-structural controls o Infiltration or evapotranspiration of runoff in excess of pre-project conditions(up to the 2-year, 24-hour precipitation event) o If ponding is used,the design must include an appropriate combination of measures such as shading, filtered bottom withdrawal,vegetated swale discharges or constructed wetland treatment cells that will limit temperature increase. The pond should be designed to draw down in 24 hours or less o Other methods that will minimize any increase in the temperature of the trout stream The infiltration areas proposed for the AUAR study area to meet the draft standard(Fall 2002) more than met the standard actually adopted in August 2003, as the adopted standard would require a smaller area of infiltration than the draft standard However, the project developer has indicated that since the site is able to meet the higher standard, the higher standard will be utilized in design of the development and its storm water facilities. Therefore the methodology used in the surface water analysis and proposed surface water runoff mitigation strategies that follow are based on the higher draft MPCA standard(Fall 2002), and will more than meet the adopted standard (August 2003). Water Quality/Surface Runoff Analysis—Methodology The boundaries of the sub-watersheds draining the project area are shown in Figure 17-1. The major sub-watershed boundaries are updated to reflect the City's 2008 Local Surface Water Management Plan. A summary of the significance of each subwatershed is presented below. • Subwatersheds 1 and 2 generate runoff that crosses the eastern boundary of the AUAR project area under Highway 3. This runoff flows through a series of ditches and depressions and eventually reaches the mainstem of the Vermillion River about 3 miles to the southeast. These subwatersheds are not tributary to North Creek. • Subwatersheds 3 and 4 lie along the northern boundary of the AUAR project area. These sub-watersheds generate runoff that flows through a series of overland drainageways to North Creek outside the study area to the northwest. • Subwatersheds 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9(2016 AUAR Update:Subwatersheds 5,6,8,and 9) generate runoff that reaches North Creek within the project area from the east. Sub-watersheds 5, 8, and 9 encompass the higher ground east of the railroad tracks that bisect the AUAR project area. (2016 AUAR Update:Subwatershed 6 52 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Iles)between the railroad tracks and the Creek itself and contain portions of the designated FEMA floodplain and/or fringe wetlands associated with North Creek. • (2016 AUAR Update:Subwatershed 10 Iles) largely west of North Creek and generate runoff that also discharges to North Creek within the project area. • 2016 AUAR Update:Subwatersheds 7 and 11 straddle North Creek and generate runoff that flows to the creek from both the east and the west. • Subwatershed 12 contains a small amount of developable area within the AUAR project area that is tributary to North Creek. This subwatershed also receives inflow from a large area to the west of the AUAR project area that flows to North Creek. Compliance with the MPCA standard requires wide-spread application of infiltration approaches to control runoff volume and associated pollutant loads for the development intensity proposed. In order to assess the suitability of soils within the AUAR study area to support infiltration,the detailed soil survey was used. The dominant soil units within the project area are shown in Figure 17-2. In general, soils that fall into SCS Hydrologic Group A or B are recommended as being suitable to support infiltration,while those in Hydrologic Group C and D are not recommended for infiltration facilities. As the figure shows,the bulk of the surficial soil units that lie east of the railroad tracks as well as soils in the far northwestern corner of the AUAR project area are Hydrologic Group B soils. The native soils lying along North Creek as well as in the southwestern portion of the site are dominated by Hydrologic Group D soils and are therefore considered unacceptable for infiltration techniques. SCS TR20 methods were used to calculate runoff volumes for each sub-watershed under existing and proposed land use conditions for various storm events up to the 10-yr 24— hour.The 10-year 24-hour rainfall event produced the largest absolute difference in runoff volumes between the two development scenarios, so it was used as the basis to estimate infiltration requirements and size infiltration facilities. Once it was determined what runoff volume had to be infiltrated to meet the MPCA criteria in each subwatershed, a methodology used by the Rice Creek Watershed District was used to estimate the size (area)of the infiltration facility to meet that objective.As per this methodology,a drawdown time of 72 hours was used for the design storm and an infiltration rate of .25"/hr.was used to characterize Hydrologic Group B soils. The RCWD methodology is included in the Appendix. For the purpose of the analyses, it was assumed that pre-treatment of stormwater runoff in each subwatershed would be provided by a detention basin with dead storage sufficient to contain the runoff volume from a 2.5"rainfall event. Properly designed ponds sized according to this criteria usually provide 60-65%removal of total phosphorus and about 85%of total suspended solids for urban runoff. This level of performance equals or exceeds generally accepted recommendations for pre-treatment of runoff introduced to an infiltration facility. The PondNet model was used as a generalized watershed loading function to calculate average annual phosphorus loads generated in each of the subwatersheds. The model was also used to rout this load through the detention basins to determine their effect in 53 Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 attenuating the load. In order to estimate the impact on phosphorus load reduction of the infiltration facilities, a methodology was employed that relates the design precipitation depth on which the infiltration facility size is based to the phosphorus load attenuation. The same methodology was used to estimate the impact of the infiltration features in reducing average annual water loads.That methodology is explained in the Appendix. The various runoff coefficients,curve numbers, impervious coverage figures,and runoff phosphorus concentrations representing each land use accounted for in the analysis is summarized in Table 2. Table 2 Land Cover Impervious Rc' CN Runoff[TP] TP Load (ppb) (lbs./yr.) Woodlands N/A .08 62 200 .10 Open Undeveloped N/A .12 65 200 .16 Non-ponded wetlands N/A .08 62 200 .10 Agricultural cropland(HG B N/A .21 72 450 .62 soils) Agricultural cropland(HG D N/A .38 81 450 1.13 soils undrained) Rural Residential <5% .12 65 300 .22 Very low density residential(2 12% .38 81 450 1.13 ac./unit on HG D soils) Low density residential 38% .26 75 450 .75 (3.5units/ac.) Medium density residential(8 65% .47 85 500 1.55 units/ac.) Commercial 78% .61 90 400 1.61 'Based on average annual precipitation of 29.2 inches per year(Vermillion River Watershed Management Plan Draft—1999). Results and Mitigation Guidance As mentioned above,the detailed soil survey for this area indicates that those subwatersheds east of the railroad ROW(subwatersheds 1-5, 8, and 9) as well as subwatershed 6 (located in the northwest portion of the project area)have large areas of soils that appear suitable for infiltration. Subwatershed 7 appears to have a very small area of suitable soils that is confined to the northern portion of this unit. Subwatersheds 10, 11,and 12 in the southwestern portion of the project area are dominated by soils that appear incapable of supporting infiltration facilities. Modeling and analysis results for subwatersheds with suitable soils for regional infiltration facilities(subwatersheds 1-6, 8, and 9)are summarized in Table 17-2. The table summarizes results for the following scenarios: 1. Existing conditions. The annual water and phosphorus loads are based on current land cover conditions,which are dominated by row crop agriculture. It is intended to be used as a benchmark reference. 2. Future development conditions without mitigation. This scenario assumes land uses reflective of the development proposal for these 54 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 subwatersheds,but with no water quality treatment or infiltration features. It is intended for reference only. 3. Future development conditions with water quality ponding mitigation only. This scenario assumes land uses reflective of the development proposal, and includes the effect of detention basins constructed according to the City of Farmington's design standards. Again, it does not account for the effect of any infiltration features. 4. Future conditions with both water quality ponding and infiltration. This is similar to Scenario 3 above, except that the effect of infiltration features sufficient to meet the MPCA's proposed infiltration standard are shown. Based on Table 17-2,the average annual post-development runoff-driven phosphorus and runoff water loads delivered to North Creek from the identified sub-watersheds will be reduced by 78%and 40%,respectively, from those estimated for the existing conditions if both the City's treatment pond standards and the MPCA's proposed runoff volume control standards are applied. The effect would be similar in subwatersheds 1 and 2 draining across the eastern boundary of the site. Altogether,these subwatersheds comprise over 80%of the AUAR project area. The remaining subwatersheds within the site(7 and 10-12)constitute about 12%of the developable area(i.e.area that is outside designated floodplain and jurisdictional wetlands)within the AUAR project area. Virtually all of these areas are underlain by much tighter soils that–in their undrained state–fall into hydrologic group D. While these soils are likely drained to support the current agricultural operations,the soils in their natural state are too impermeable for infiltration to be a recommended stormwater management technique at the proposed development densities. Mitigation Plan-2016 AUAR Update No changes in mitigation plan strategies for the 2016 AUAR Update compared to the 2011 AUAR Update. As the AUAR area develops, surface water runoff will be managed in accordance with the City's 2008 Local Surface Water Management Plan as well as watershed and State requirements. Stormwater BMPs will be implemented to satisfy City, watershed, and State requirements. BMPs will be designed in accordance with the recently-adopted NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall amounts and distributions. Such BMPs could include stormwater storage for rate control;infiltration,filtration,bioretention,or stormwater reuse for volume control and water quality treatment;and temporary erosion and sediment control features such as vegetative restoration, storm drain inlet protection, construction entrance protection,and silt fence. Mitigation Plan Goal 1. Protect the water and habitat quality of North Creek to meet or exceed applicable MPCA water quality standards. Protection Strategies: 55 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 1. The City of Farmington will work with the developer to identify and consider strategies to infiltrate and detain stormwater to reduce runoff to protect North Creek. Infiltration strategies will be considered in areas where Hydrologic Soil Groups A and B have been identified by the Dakota County Detailed Soil Survey. The City's P.U.D. ordinance allows for modifications through its design review process to accommodate a variety of strategies to infiltrate or detain stormwater and meet the identified performance standard. The following strategies will be considered for use where feasible in the AUAR area: • Reduce residential street widths to reduce impervious surface coverage • Use vegetated islands within cul de sacs designed to hold stormwater • Provide small scale infiltration areas such as "rainwater gardens" and /or larger regional infiltration basins • Use cluster development that maintains open space, minimizes impervious surfaces, and protects soils with high infiltration rates, so that drainage may be directed to these areas • Encourage homeowners to direct downspouts from roofs over yards or other vegetated areas or into rain barrels, and away from driveways or paved surfaces • Encourage plantings of native vegetation on public and private properties to slow and capture runoff and encourage infiltration • Infiltration strategies will also help to maintain the quantity and quality of shallow ground water flows that sustain North Creek • In planning areas where shallow ground water prevents the use of infiltration as a stormwater management strategy, consider use of shaded swales or other strategies to control the temperature of runoff before it reaches North Creek. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington,private developers,MPCA. Regulatory Program: MPCA Water Quality Standards. Implementation Time Frame: Identify strategies to implement these plans as a part of the final plat and grading plan; implement strategies as development occurs. 2. In areas where Hydrologic Soil Groups C and D have been identified by the Dakota County Detailed Soil Survey, infiltration is not an effective strategy for managing surface water runoff volumes. (These soil types are concentrated in the southwest portion of the AUAR study area;see Figure 17-2.) In these areas, the following strategies will be considered to manage surface water runoff and protect the quality and water temperature of North Creek: • Filtration strategies such as swales and"rainwater gardens"may be used to protect water quality • Where ponds are required to manage water quality and quantity, and protect the creek from high flows, water will be discharged where 56 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 possible through shaded swales, channels or pipes to cool the water temperature before it reaches the creek. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington,private developers,MPCA. Regulatory Program: MPCA Water Quality Standards. Implementation Time Frame: Identify strategies to implement these plans as a part of the final plat and grading plan; implement strategies as development occurs. 3. Implement provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Surface Water Management Plan, Wetland Ordinance, and Shoreline Ordinance to protect the natural areas in the North Creek Corridor by restricting development within the corridor and floodplain areas, and requiring vegetated buffers along the creek and wetlands in the corridor. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington and private developer. Regulatory Program: Enforcement of City Ordinances. The City may also apply to non-regulatory programs such as DNR's Metro Greenways and Conservation Partners programs to seek funding assistance for protection and restoration of natural communities. Implementation Time Frame: Enforcement of Ordinances will occur with development. Restoration activities may be completed as resources are available. 4. The developer will follow the requirements of the Farmington Surface Water Management Plan and Wetland Ordinance, and applicable state and federal regulations, to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate for impacts to wetlands that result from development. Responsible Parties: Private developer, City of Farmington, and regulatory agencies Regulatory Program: Farmington Surface Water Management Plan, Wetland Ordinance, Shoreland Ordinance, Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, and Minnesota DNR Protected Waters Program. Implementation Time Frame: Complete analysis of wetland impacts and mitigation needs as fmal plat and grading plan are completed. Implement efforts to avoid or mitigate for impacts as development occurs. 5. Require the use, management and enforcement of Best Management Practices (BMP's) to control erosion and sedimentation and provide pretreatment of 57 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 water discharged to wetlands during and after construction, as specified in the City's Surface Water Management Plan. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington Regulatory Program: City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, Wetland Ordinance, Excavation and Grading Ordinance and Grading Plan Requirements,and NPDES Phase II Stormwater Management Program. Implementation Time Frame: Specify BMP's to be used in grading plans, and implement BMP's as development occurs. 6. The Minnesota DNR and Vermillion River Watershed JPO should continue monitoring efforts on North Creek and the Vermillion River, including biomonitoring through the River Watch program,flow monitoring,and electro- fishing and stream temperature studies to identify any significant changes as development occurs in the AUAR area. Responsible Parties: Minnesota DNR and VRWD Regulatory Program: Vermillion River Watershed Management Plan Implementation Time Frame: Existing monitoring should be continued. 58 Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 Table 17-2 a w _ i S 0 111 l P. G • C/!, O .. F PE 1 DR C r. 'NR - ..-lfIO r9 a l , , . C 141 t 07 0 , a 4 4 A 8 " At li ki 1:471 8 01 E. d 9 �e +y+�es c cv 4o c N ri rr v,iii_qi ; 1 J' a7 O I P r3 en P r4 N -+.e7 A `�' R '�'' .-; yyyy el ch 0 G .,,� rn 1 v. wp r• M N fl OJ Nt !� O It 'T d`i ,fi, Q iii. Ir- C 41 en014Nri -- yQy' vi fto O j I ! 41 p ° I. �. o �3 fi`- 0 0 ;.7. 1 40 en We 01 on 0 —. va r- cr. b tw 6 R ( g 1 'w 1 •Y 1 I..5 Yo ."1 eq 40 0 �..___,._ — � - , �.� ° . E g@ in 1a o� S7 I tri .-' a 1c-. 0 VI Zoi", � d - ril t: e.6 IP — on .. et ..+ —. NQ G.„13 !. L. 44 5 41 ,+� a i4 �I t 2� o ` i 4 1 [� I !V441 S1' FYI s.Q 00 4h y 0 C��J !! 59 N W '\ Eel. Ni r '., ' AV-A1.17 O i1 ra 191 acres 24" ,- 1 AV-A1.14 O5Ns_ i 18 acres I A1.1 O 4 AV-A1.16 AV-:1.10 35 acres ® \ \ / :, 40 acres AV-A2.3 .fir VR-A2.1 O 1 \ • ti 4 48 acres 154 acres j \ Q AV-A1.13 , •a O X-,',N. 114 acres I 4 \ w i• v 176:9s 1 146 \ ® V A2.2 i 160 acre AV-A2.4 —0.— Flow Direction Proposed Storm Sewer S I Q ,�; 195th '�4,, Sub-Watershed Boundaries :0 acres i —II- Railroad 1 C.:;'1_,. i Waterbodies 84 ia?resct7/ 1 .4„ Wetlandssification re,� 60Oacres44\'., I Manage 1 Manage 2 3' 19• St W Manage 3 AV-A2.2 � � 100-year Floodplain O acre Parcels s �� _ i,-�\ /h' City Boundary N Study Area Boundary City of Farmington Ear% Seed-Genstar Ci Stantec s_ i AUAR-Update 2016 $' . .7/1 Feet Area Sub-Watersheds Figure 17-1 December2016 1,200 0 1,200 V:\1938\active\193803747\GIS\Projects\Fig 17-1 AreaSubWatersheds.mxd N W '/ ■.req..a..NMI.fl MEM a.a 13 Id S -- AV-A1.17 I; • AV-A1.14 ' lo:V Study Area Boundary //� AV-A1.15 AV-A1.16 � City Boundary 11A,' Railroad 1 I , ParcelBase Map • ® Sub-Watershed Boundary • FEMA 100-Year Floodplain Hydrologic Soil Groups 7 High infiltration rates. Soils are AV-A1.10 deep,well-drained to excessively 10 V AV-A2.3 drained sands and gravels. ,e�� A VR-A2.1 B Li , Moderate infiltration rates. Deep/ i`T%. moderately deep,moderately well/ Vh '.�✓✓✓/ , well drained soils with moderately A �G coarse textures. �1 17 B/D / $ , j// �� " Deep,very poorly drained soils �.�` I ./ y with high water tables and frequent Y« 444, . flooding .��P , . . ND r/�f s Deep,pooly drained soils on outwash r89th sf �� /, j plains and stream terraces. 3 j / AV-A2.4 Source:Dakota County Detailed Soil Survey,1983. 195th St 3 VR—A2 2 i N, / ; AV-A2.2 /' - - - / ` /- 194th St W ,.<-1.[-, w> L Kvi..h 11 [1 El . City of Farmington ,C ilu it\, Seed-Genstar 7 '1,,,,,,....../)f AUAR-Update Bonestroo Feet \ `'� Hydrologic Group Soils t ' I Figure 17-2 June 2011 1,200 0 1,200 K:\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\Fig 17-2 Hydric Soils.mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 18. Water Quality— Wastewaters No changes in wastewater impacts Identified for the 2016 AUAR Update compared to the 2011 AUAR Update. As the AUAR area develops, sanitary sewer infrastructure will be implemented in accordance with the City's 2008 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan.Figure 18-1 has been updated to reflect the 2008 Plan. a. Describe sources,quantities,and composition(except for normal domestic sewage) of all sanitary and industrial wastewaters produced or treated at the site. Areas within the AUAR study area include mostly low density and medium density residential with a small pocket of commercial area. The land uses within the study area will generate typical quantities of wastewater. Unit wastewater flow rates for each land use type are presented in the City of Farmington's May 1996 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan. b. Describe any waste treatment methods to be used and give estimates of composition after treatment, or if the project involves on-site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of the site conditions for such systems. Ident& receiving waters (including ground water)and estimate the impact of the discharge on the quality of the receiving waters. (If discharge may affect a lake consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a nutrient budget analysis is needed.) All development within the AUAR study area will be routed into the proposed trunk sewer via lateral service lines. The proposed trunk lines will be routed into the existing MCES Apple Valley Interceptor and conveyed to the Empire Wastewater Treatment Facility. No on-site sewage systems currently exist within the study area. c. If wastes will be discharged into a sewer system or pretreatment system, idents the system and discuss the ability of the system to accept the volume and composition of the wastes. Identj any improvements, which will be necessary. Two proposed trunk sewer lines will service the majority of the AUAR study area and will convey wastewater to the existing 48-inch Apple Valley Interceptor(see Figure 18-1). One line will service the southwest portion of the study area,and one will service the east side. The area in the northwest corner of the study area will be routed via lateral sewers directly into the Apple Valley Interceptor. It is not necessary to service this area with a trunk line. The trunk sewers are described in a 2002 addendum to the City's May 1996 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan. They are sized for prospective sewage flows from the AUAR study area. These trunks will discharge into the existing 48" Apple Valley Interceptor. The point of connection into the existing interceptor will be at Manhole#17, as designated in the MCES (then Metropolitan Waste Control Commission)as-built plans for the interceptor. This manhole is located in the southern portion of the study area on the west side of the railroad tracks. The interceptor will convey sewage to the Empire Wastewater Treatment Facility located in Empire Township. This facility is designed to accommodate the sewage flows generated by the AUAR study area. 62 N W 0E /(\ w D7-1 S 6" r 1 •- j J 48" 8" I D7-2 \\•� C----.. D1-8 \e"-e" ,S \ , • \ D7-3 . \ • • • • � a \ •S -- \ ,, CO 'a \ ,•`.••• D7-4 4 48 \ i -; K.) 10" D1-16 • 12" . I o lit rititilAt `.. IIf i ', 12" i , , ,. I '10" 48" � , X15" ,� •. D7-5 r , . SO S D7-6 '- 1 i City of Farmington • Nodes Al'Railroad 4 , Seed-Genstar • Proposed Lift Station Parcels /is.Stantec s\, ;` Proposed Trunk Sewer N Sewer District Boundary AUAR-Update 2016 /y City Boundary Feet N Proposed Forcemain !.----'-- Trunk Sanitary N Existing Trunk Sewer A/Study Area Boundary t 1 Sewer System Figure 18-1 December 2016 1,ZOO 0 1,200 9 V:\1938\active\193803747\GIS\Projects\Fig 18-1Trunk Sanitary Sewer.mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 19. Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: 0 minimum 50 average To bedrock: <50 minimum 100 average Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also idents them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. Information from the Dakota County Geologic Atlas and well logs from the County Well Index were used to determine depth to bedrock and depth groundwater. Since no wells logs could be located within the project area,well logs from wells immediately outside the perimeter of the project area were analyzed. A depth to bedrock map is presented in the Dakota County Geologic Atlas and is shown in Figure 19-1.The north central portion of the project area exhibits depth to bedrock less than 50 feet,which generally corresponds the presence of the Platteville-Glenwood bedrock group. See Figure 19-2 for the current bedrock map from the Dakota County Geologic Atlas.The rest of the project area exhibits bedrock depth between 50-100 feet,with a buried bedrock valley in the south central portion of the project area showing depths to bedrock between 100-150 feet. Well logs from just outside the western perimeter of the project area show bedrock depths ranging between 65 and 140 feet. The minimum depth to groundwater occurs in the west, southwest portion of the project area, in the general area of the North Creek.This creek is likely fed by groundwater and, as such,groundwater is often less than 5 feet from the surface in the area of the creek. Depth to groundwater in the remaining project area varies somewhat,depending on topography,overlying units of bedrock,and the aquifer in which a measurement is taken. The average depth presented was derived using information obtained from the Dakota County Geologic Atlas(Minnesota Geological Survey, 1990). The water table elevation in the general project area(approximately 900 feet above sea level)was subtracted from the land elevations(900-1000 feet above sea level)as found on the USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle.Range of depth to water varies from 0 to 100 feet,with the average being 50 feet.The lack of wells logs from within the project area makes it difficult to define the groundwater levels with greater detail. Based on maps from the Dakota County Geology Atlas,no known sinkholes or karst conditions are present within the project area.The Platteville Limestone is present at less than 50 feet from the land surface in the northern portion of the project area, but does not appear to be exposed within the project area. 64 / J N / W If E / A 41 •■ s / 1 // • 3 I k,,,,,j`/) — — -_ Name 0, anm" ,F, \ e 1U !P' m „lam co ( e 741,14,1rtsubis mos rr.}.p. - (-) NO qt. wi Pik I I I I L1 I _ _. "195th St W / 1(-- 4,, • '1%*1/ *1 . 110140.10.* �I►"41111461mHiii21 ��- W►� ��� I‘M iii 1111. IIII gib 11111104.0 111• 4110wA as No V �►_ fa ► �\ 111111 1 w I. ��� , - 11111, City of Farmington Depth to Bedrock /\/ Study Area Boundary vSeed-Genstar I I Less than 50 feet / 4 City Boundary AUAR-Update 1 151 to 100 feet Railroad BonestrooIi /\ 101 to 150 feet / Parcel Base Map Feet Depth to Bedrock IIIMONJune 2011 Figure 19-1 K:\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\ 1,200 0 1,200 Fig 19-1 Depth to Bedrock.mxd IN W � = E /rI S I 1 i A ill I L,„`", I St. Peter Sandstone ! i ..c,..\\N i _,. Platteville and Glenwood Formations !! i lo � g9th Prairie Du Chien Group i I ; ► ' 1fle - 195th St W I___ r !i -\ 11 - T/ i tj 1� I. 194thStW(( • fl ____>e 41 w waft \0 fa _ l } MI -F I \ �_ ( • �1 L I City of Farmington Bedrock Types ^/ Study Area Boundary 6�� ' Seed-Genstar I I St.Peter Sandstone lir City Boundary 5, Stantec Ti Prairie Du Chien Group Railroad AUAR-Update I I Platteville&Glenwood Parcel Base Map ,,_�� ' Formations Feet Bedrock Geology I I December2016 Figure 19-2 1,200 0 1,200 V:11938\active\193803747\GIS\Projects\Fig 19-2 Bedrock Geology.mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 b. Describe the soils on the site, giving SCS classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. Figure 19-3 shows the soil classifications within the AUAR study area. A band of loam and sand soils extends through the center of the site,with silt and muck soils concentrated to the east and west of this band. Soils in the center of the site have a moderate to good potential for infiltration,while those to the east and west have limited capacity. The geologic atlas indicates that surficial deposits of glacial till, outwash, and organic deposits mainly cover the site. Figure 19-4 shows the surficial deposits for the project area,as showing in the atlas.The"Old Gray"till is a pre-late Wisconsinan deposit. It is calcareous and consists of two tills.The lower till,most commonly seen in the mapped areas, is a firm loam to clay loam.A small area of River Falls Formation Drift is located near the center of the project area.This formation consists of undivided till,outwash, and ice-contact stratified drift. It usually thin and overlays other tills, such as the Old Gray till.The outwash in the southwestern portion of the project area is a Des Moines lobe deposit consisting of sand, loamy sand,and gravel.These materials generally allow much higher infiltration rates than till and translates into a higher sensitivity of the underlying aquifer. In a linear orientation along the North Creek,the organic deposits can be found.These deposits consist of people and organic-rich silt and clay. A plate located in the geologic atlas indicates the Prairie Du Chien-Jordan Aquifer's overall sensitivity to pollution.This is the aquifer from which the City of Farmington obtains its water supply for municipal use. Additionally,most domestic wells in the area utilize this aquifer for drinking water.The map indicating the aquifer's sensitivity is based on several assumptions, including soils, surficial geology, and bedrock geology.The map is used as a general gauge of the aquifer's overall susceptibility to pollution based on the travel time of pollutants from a surface source to the aquifer itself. A shorter anticipated time of travel translates into a higher sensitivity rating for aquifer. Figure 19-5 shows the project boundaries projected onto this plate from the geologic atlas. The west-southwest portion of the project area is rated as"High"in sensitivity. This means that a pollutant would likely have to travel weeks to years before it reached the aquifer. The remaining project area ranges from"High-Moderate"to "Low-Moderate"to"Low".Pollutant travel times range from years to a decade for"High-Moderate"areas, several decades for"Low Moderate"areas, and several decades to a century for"Low"areas.The lowest areas of sensitivity in the project area occur where Platteville formation is present, as the Glenwood Shale at the bottom of the Platteville formation acts as a confining unit to the lower St.Peter aquifer.This area also exhibits the Old Gray till deposits that further impede infiltration rates.The"High"sensitivity area not only shows a lack of the Platteville formation,but the dominant surficial deposits are the Des Moines lobe outwash,which allow for higher infiltration rates. 67 611D396 313 4116 415B 411A12939B 129 2C 4158 611C 129N 41B 39B 378 411A 5 44 611C X4118riS W�� F 313 78 a 2C 41f ` S39 313 411��� 13 41B 4156 s .n.� ., • 176 2C 0/1 I • ■ 301B2C • ' i 41 B I ©'', ,..iii2 ALA ■ ■ ■ Soils i■®b2°9'04f5e"'•■■MOM■■Ma■■■■N••� 2136 ' Key 2B Ostrander Loam,1-6%Slopes 415A ® 2C Ostrander Loam,6 12%Slopes 2138 1 39A Wadena Loam,0-2%Slopes 378 • 39B Wadena Loam,2-6%Slopes 39D Wadena Loam,12-18%Slopes i 416 Estherville Sandy Loam,2-6%Slopes ' 1896? 129 Cylinder Loam 173F Frontenac Silt Loam,25-40%Slopes 176 Garwin Silty Clay Loam 396 2136 208 Kato Silty Clay Loam 213B Klinger Silt Loam,1-5%Slopes 250 Kennebec Silt Loam 252 Marshan Silty Clay Loam 255 Mayer Silt Loam 2856 Port Byron Sift Loam,2-6%Slopes 301E3 Lindstrom Silt Loam,1-4%Slopes f8•6:' 4_ 1 313 Spillville Loam,Occasionally Flooded 1 . 318 Mayer Loam,Swales 3206 Tallula Silt Loam,2-6%Slopes X52 ii.. 2C 320C2 Tall 1896B378 ula Silt Loam,6-12%Slopes 411A Maxfield Silty Clay Loam 4116 Waukegan Silt Loam,0-1%Slopes 411A - 415A Waukegan Silt Loam,1-6%Slopes 255 415B Kanaranzi Loam,0-2%Slopes 415C Kanaranzi Loam,2-6%Slopes 539 Kanaranzi Loam,6-12%Slopes 539 540 Palms Muck i29 611C Seeleyville Muck 611D Hawick Coarse Sandy Loam,6-12%Slopes 9�h 857A Hawick Coarse Sandy Loam,12-18%Slopes 39A 963C2 Urban Land-Waukegan Complex,0-1%Slopes 963D2 Timula-Bold Silt Loams,6-12%Slopes 28 1029 Timula-Bold Silt Loams,12-18%Slopes • 1055 Gravel Pits 195th St W ' 18966 Aquolls&Histosols,Ponded ■ Carmi Loam,2-8%Slopes f F' 398 •,Ir 252 611 C 252 213fI 252 41 B t 129 f�� i i �.� // U�' N,// r.194th ▪ `�•/ 4158 611C l 1 415A ,' 102 129 41 B ,.�� 611C m :&PSM»} .. Li ; --. 129 - ,. 1 A: ■ 416 415B 611C City of Farmington A/ Study Area Boundary Ai, VI Seed-Genstar CiRty Boundary oad 1AUAR-Update /\/ Parcel Base Map Bonestroo Feet " Soils June 2011 i Figure 19-3 K:\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\ 1,200 0 1,200 Fig 19-3 Soils.mxd I N W!� E / 1 • / I S / ■ •—ar—_i.MIN.M11111EL.4--- ----------- / I' • • , ,, 1 i , , ■ ■ , ,,,,, • .vy I\ I . , '�, i 1 � 1. i. 11 N I ' I IL.I.1/ \�i� yi 1 �ifira, �*t• O. a 1 7'�I _ f .I.I1ifl :00 i1 v .1 L�'1111. ' `\ U 11_ 195th St W - T�� 7-Wn' is. \ / C36,... ' // 1. / _(---- .. ,„• . ........_\A 1 194th St W 1 r 111 1111101 la LE - 1 ' III � 1 _ �� i\ ‘ 1 la :,/iti 7 • ♦ e1 . Surficial Geology City of Farmington I-1 Organic Deposits /\/ Study Area Boundary ..4i '/.t,, Seed-Genstar I pkt I Old Gray Till /.; City Boundary r I psdl Pre-Late Wisconsin DepositsAlRailroad ,�. AUAR-Update ET Outwash /'/ Parcel Base Map Bonestroo Feet '"""'+ Idsol Outwash Surficial Geology 1 June 2011 Figure 19-4 K:\141\141113330\GIS\Projects\ 1,200 0 1,200 Fig 19-4 Surficial Geology.mxd / i N / W �, E / l ••/ Is 3 j LOW - • � I �= ,\ ;' MODERATE LOW ' fl 1 j A \ / \\ \ - .,4 /� j .� HIGH � MODERATE 111 ! 11,,,,. II TIT ��� 1 11 C,4..� f� HIGH ' NE "0 'h � --- 7.r \ ' l_iluziy; �IBTI -- r • , t " r - ii •, II, , _, tHam,_ \ ' e _Ai*111111 - g 1 Fs: 1 4 __- • H nib/►- - N. ,ss„, m 1 it f %; I ' \ 11 Sensitivity Ratings City of Farmington High-Hours to Months A/StudyArea Boundary F Seed-Genstar High/Moderate-Years to a Decade/.,'City Boundary '. f Low/Moderate-Several Decades A/Railroad AUAR-Update Low-Several Decades to a Centu Bonestroo �'L..,,.I� ry�Parcel Base Map Feet Sensitivity to Aquifer - I June 2011 Figure 19-5 K:\1 41\1411 13330\GIS\Projects\ 1,200 0 1,200 Fig 19-5 Sensitivity to Aquifer mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 20. Solid Wastes;Hazardous Wastes;Storage Tanks a. Describe the types, amounts, and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes to be generated, including animal manure, sludge and ashes. Identify the method and location of disposal.For projects generating municipal solid waste indicate ifthere will be a source separation plan; list type(s) and how the project will be modified to allow recycling. This 2016 AUAR Update reflects changes in the total number of households currently present in the AUAR study area since 2011. Waste to be generated by the proposed development is anticipated to consist primarily of household waste. As is currently the case in Farmington, solid waste will be collected weekly by a licensed hauler and disposed of at a licensed landfill. Curbside collection of materials for recycling will also be available in the study area, as will collection of yard waste. Using statistical information collected by the City of Farmington,and the development scenario proposed for the study area, an estimate of total municipal solid waste generated under existing conditions and at build-out was prepared(see Table 21.1). In addition,volumes of existing and predicted recycling/source separation programs were calculated. Existing land use in the AUAR study area is mainly agricultural, with some undeveloped areas. Some residential development is present along 194t Street (adjacent to the study area); scattered residences or farmsteads are present along Chippendale/Highway 3. Because the bulk of the property is undeveloped or has been used agriculturally, current waste generation is minimal. For the purposes of generating an estimate of current waste produced in the study area,one household is assumed to be present,based on 2015 aerial photography for the area. Future land uses designated for the study area include primarily low density residential, with some medium density residential and a small amount of business development in the northeast portion of the study area. Some areas of the site are not considered developable, due to the presence of North Creek and its floodplain (124.5 acres), designated railroad and street right-of-ways(52.67 acres),or other conditions. According to development plans for the study area,29 acres of the study area are proposed for mixed-use commercial/residential development, 558 developable acres are proposed as low and low/medium density residential,and 120 developable acres are proposed as medium density residential. Low density residential allows 1 to 3.5 units per acre; low/medium density allows for 3.5 to 6.0 units per acre;medium density residential allows 6.0 to 12.0 units per acre. Although not likely for the whole area of residential development,the maximum number of units is assumed for the post-development scenario presented in the tables below.Thus it is assumed that low density residential will contain 3.5 units per acre, low/medium density will contain 6 units per acre, and medium density residential will contain 12 units per acre. For the purposes of calculating waste generation estimates, it is also assumed that 1 unit represents 1 household. 71 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 The following statistics were obtained or derived from City of Farmington 2015 records. The non-residential statistics apply to areas of commercial and multi- family development. Persons per household: 2.95 persons/household Waste generation per household: .71 tons/household/year Residential recycling: 1.53 tons/household/year Yard waste,composted: 0.14 tons/household/year Non-Residential Waste Generation: 2.31 tons/acre/year Non-Residential Recycling 10.47 tons/acre/year Calculations were completed using the above statistical information and the development scenario proposed for the study area. Comparisons of current and predicted potential waste generation quantities are presented in the table below. Estimates related to recycling and yard waste composting are presented in the text following the table. Table 21.1 Solid Waste Generation Source Existing Units Under Existing Potential Units Under Proposed Land Use (at maximum Development Scenario development) Residential 1 households .71 tons/year 3,896 2,766 tons/year households Non- 0 acres 0 tons/year 29 acres 67 tons/year Residential Total Waste .71 tons/year 2,833 tons/year Generated Solid waste generated in the city of Farmington is collected on a weekly basis by the City or a customer selected hauler. The waste is taken to a landfill licensed to accept such waste for disposal. DSI collects materials for recycling and composting. It is assumed that this company will continue to provide collection service to the AUAR study area after development. According to City of Farmington records,approximately twice as much waste is recycled as is sent to the landfill. Under current conditions, it is estimated that approximately.71 tons of solid waste is recycled via curbside pick-up per year in the study area, and approximately 1.53 tons is recycled. After development, it is estimated that approximately 5,960 tons/year of solid waste would be recycled. The amount of recycling in the area associated with the proposed business development is estimated to be approximately 303 tons per year. 72 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 City records indicate approximately 0.14 tons of yard waste per household is composted each year. Under current conditions,yard waste composting is estimated to be.14 tons/year for the study area. Under potential development conditions, approximately 545 tons of yard waste from the study area would be composted per year. b. Iden*any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present on the project site and idents measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission,discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission. 2016 Update:The following databases were reviewed to evaluate on-site or nearby potential sources of contamination or environmental hazards:the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) "What's in My Neighborhood" (WIMN),the Minnesota Department of Agriculture(MDA) "County Spill Records" and the MPCA Petroleum Remediation Program(PRP)online maps. The Fairhill Development site is located In the study area and was identified in the WIMN database as a Leak Site (Leak#00016818), a Petroleum Brownfield Site (3727) and a Voluntary Investigation&Cleanup Site (VP24310). The identified products released were diesel fuel,fuel oil 1 &2, gasoline and motor oil and was reported to the MPCA on May 5,2007. Based on available records, all three MPCA program release numbers are related to the same release. On October 7, 2008,MPCA staff determined that the investigation and/or cleanup had adequately addressed the petroleum tank release and issued a Petroleum Tank Release Site File Closure letter. Southern Hills Golf Club and Course is located east of the study area and Chippendale Road/Highway 3. It is identified in the WIMN database as a small to minimal quantity hazardous waste generator(SQG) and a MDA Spill site. It appears that the spill listing is in regard to a June 2, 1992 spill event. The spill reportedly involved the release of an herbicide product. Given the location of the spill (off-site),the length of time that has passed since the release occurred, and the small amount of product released(reported as 7.0 gallons of diluted herbicide and as 3.0 ounces of Lesco 3-Way(a broadleaf herbicide)), it appears unlikely that this release would have significant potential to impact the study area. GEES, Inc., Brad Schmitz and Al's Auto Body are located adjacent to southeast portion of the study area.The sites were identified in the WIMN database as small to minimal SQGs. It appears unlikely that these sites have significant potential for impacts to the study area. The Toro Company located at 18010 Chippendale Avenue W(adjacent site to the east), was identified as Tank Site 126252 for three tanks installed in 2014 and 2015. Based on the distance to the study area,it is unlikely that the site would have significant potential to impact the study area. The National Pipeline Mapping System identified three pipelines crossing the study area-a hazardous liquid pipeline in the northwest corner of the study area, a hazardous liquid pipeline trending east-west through the central portion of the 73 Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 study area and a gas pipeline trending north-south through the central portion of the study area.The energy company associated with each pipeline is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the pipelines,and remediation activities should a release occur. Due to the past and current agricultural use of property within the study area,a variety of pesticides have likely been used and stored within the study area. Small storage tanks for petroleum products are also likely to have been,or remain present at the current and former farmsteads within the study area. In addition, residual contamination related to the tank release may be present.If contamination is discovered during the course of development,the developer or other responsible party will be required to address the situation,according to MPCA rules. The temporary and potential future use of hazardous materials and petroleum products within the study area is addressed below in part c. c. Indicate the number, location, size, and use of any above or below ground tanks to be used for storage of petroleum products or other materials (except water). Describe any emergency response containment plans. During construction activities, it is likely that portable storage tanks of fuel for construction vehicles and machinery may be temporarily located in various areas of the study area. For the purpose of minimizing impact due to potential spills,the re-fueling of vehicles and machinery will be conducted away from North Creek, wetlands, and other sensitive areas. Approximately 29 acres of mixed-use commercial/residential development is proposed at the northwest corner of 195th Street and TH3. This mixed-use commercial/residential area is intended to support smaller neighborhood business uses. This includes typical convenience-type goods and services which may have above or below ground petroleum tanks. Mitigation Plan Goal 1. Protect future site occupants and the natural environment from the presence of past contamination. Protection Strategies: 1. If soil contamination is discovered through due diligence testing or during the course of development,the developer or other responsible party will be required to appropriately mitigate the contaminants according to the type of development planned and in compliance with MPCA rules and Dakota County ordinance. 2. Location of future storage tanks and businesses that produce,store,or use hazardous materials and/or petroleum products will consider the sensitivity of the area geology and avoid locations where sensitivity is 74 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 high,depth to bedrock or groundwater is shallow,or the area overlaps with the City of Farmington's Drinking Water Supply Management Area. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington,private developers,MPCA. Regulatory Program: MPCA guidelines and Dakota County Ordinance 110. Implementation Time Frame: Implement strategies as development occurs. 75 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 21. Traffic This section summarizes a traffic study that was prepared for the 2011 AUAR Update.Since no development has occurred in the AUAR study area since 2011, the 2011 traffic study was updated to reflect projected changes in background traffic growth in the year 2036. Recommended mitigation Items proposed in the 2011 AUAR Update are compared against forecasted traffic volumes in 2036. Changes to the analysis since the 2011 AUAR Update are noted in bold. The proposed development consists of mostly single-family residential land use with small areas of multi-family residential interspersed within. A small commercial area and community center area are also proposed to provide services to the surrounding residential development and community. According to the most recent site plan from 2004, the development would have three accesses to TH 3, and two on 190th Street West. Since development of the 2004 site plan,Dakota County completed the East West Corridor Study and MnDOT prepared a draft access management plan for TH 3. The MnDOT draft access management plan authorizes two primary and one secondary access to TH 3 between 170th St. and 190th St.The northernmost primary access,on an approximate 175th St.alignment,is dedicated for the future Dakota County east-west corridor.The future east- west corridor is north of Farmington city limits. The remaining primary and secondary access allowed in the MnDOT draft access management plan are available for direct connection to the AUAR area off of TH 3. The study area included the following intersections: • TH 3 (South Robert Trail)& 160th Street West(CSAH 46) • TH 3 (Chippendale Avenue)& 170th Street West(CSAH 58) • TH 3 (Chippendale Avenue)& 190th Street West • TH 3 (Chippendale Avenue)&CSAH 66 (Vermillion River Trail) • TH 3 (Chippendale Avenue)&Elm Street(CSAH 50) • Akin Road& 195th Street West(CSAH 64) • TH 3 and site accesses A,B,and C • 190th Street West and site accesses D and E The study analyzed the following scenarios: •2011 Existing Conditions •Future No Build Conditions •Future Build Conditions(2036) The analysis year for this project is 2031 (twenty-year build-out). The AM and PM peaks were analyzed. For the 2016 update,traffic forecasts for the year 2036 were analyzed to ensure that conditions remain similar to the 2031 analysis. Figure 21-1 shows the location map. Figure 21-2 shows the most recent site plan. 76 1ort�Like 15 ,. , o „Heights Ma12:' O od A 1z maple F3la�r. -12 ,a _• i. , i..` 8 12 .9 a 91 0 „ Oakdale ,s Hudson, iR i2 , Hamm, 1 I_.! ,s1 i R Otis 4'-pSt.P.aUI andtan akalr_'�T. y,"—�� 92 ' t9 Minr1A••1 �_ • ,__ , ropy, 13 Laketand Shores as S T. C 2z 3s eSt Bon'1 �a S.:.;.hpark. aven ,te , . V•mi tt_ Te ::ut dbury• h St P ! s I 35 endota Newport A i-, ON F NI - Vitetorie`Chan f l C nhds-?n � `- 491. 26 S5'st Paul Park Cottage 20 __ River Falls' 'h��t, "t.l'i i�r' l -� 1 11 �' i 101 l;- 1 I ri r _ ° a rove j 17 �'r I 1 77 agan Inver Grove I C_A R iF' I ° WISCONSIN -zi2 r;�` ��" � ` 1i' Heights i r�; --. i- yJl- I __ 140—X \I � 78 r,y 35W 35E 31----3 _-''' 78- / 65 L2 I8 -n yyt--1,yr,-(;,i- I MI. t• I = Nininge►e I f - E Beldam 43 /r r 7j-- 1 -83` `fy� -` +. a y. • �<_ - Ha.SN .}>:``�''r .. - - 1 ) -14--- I ,`l 27 1 42 j L 33 :b Rosemount : -a 10.�.mT.-rimbelle °Ellsv so Is ez lake I �Coates '� P I E R C E ut r 189sri ��/ ( i _.. 18--� 91 10 sa'-.. I ; SI ,t,„, �r \ I ', i 1 17 35 e282 -'`�( -C it 21 `}- 9 9 A `K O T.A 82 --- i Diamond 1laftw -'fir-`� rj 8e . 1 La =villa Empire. Vermillion 318 Bkdf - Jordan i3 Jordan y_.50 ,fa • akin 81 85 fe Plaine Helena 8 - . C :_ --; 70 s 63 Esdail 7 59 61 Cedar 91 29 , 1 Eureka 4Hampton •n, ,Hager City ' St.Benedict „Lake Center "Miesville ' Bay City s 15 56--+� 46 M I N N E S O T A ! S C O T T New ! et a 52 „Welch Red Wing- , J I Eider Castle '•ck__a _se 20'9� New Prague • a 23 Randolph _ Wacot i Webster etwood 3 ' ,Hay Cre1 • Heideltle , 'veseu s 19 ''Cannon Falls `Vasa x—28 -- 2- Lonsdale Waterford ) I Belvidere 1 30 a Little- 19 -- nton G 0 O,,D-H-U E Mills Chicago oRhfiekl t zingto a 26 _Wheatland _2a 58 2 / Montgomery -_ _ R C E Creek 9 ry Millersburgo-- DO Iz ,a Wan Ctayeenk E S U E U R 122 218_ .So9n hue Le Center i r- nisOn Wastedo - 9 - .. STUDY LOCATION NOT TO SCALE on III 11.4 Ill % rr { .� PROJECT LOCATION 1411 CITY OF FARMINGTON inVi :� _ C� DAKOTA COUNTY ill_ -1 LOCATION MAP FIGURE 21-1 SEED/GENSTAR AUAR UPDATE If Bonestroo CITY OF FARMINGTON Project 000141-11333 DATE: 24 JUNE 2011 O ri z 5 f.ZQ 11,1I . . ,,-,'7 1 ' ` t<t • i� `fi %,,-.,. 0. ,-, ,r n' as . --0. ..• ., I • iy 1 Iv , �• '� t • 1L1k 1 \' '41,4 1 . 00000.1)1 ' . L 0 4.''4°141 44 , „ , 4 i k \,., ‘,,,,,,, , ., 16 + S Y II AI r -p • - . x , I II- o ,' I I I.' '1ij C ''''',Y1 .'.`,;',;, s_ U Imo. • �: Q A I a t '1 i kI I ,' F t 0 3 111& & r !.•-i.• *.a a I I t.f,dr,a•al atabi %At%ill.ANt,i-►t•601eadr."AA01Yr+tlndr%a Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Table 21.01 presents a summary of the existing roadway conditions in the study area with updated AADT. Figure 21-3 shows the roadways in the study area. TABLE 21.01—EXISTING ROADWAYS STREET NAME FUNCTIONAL CLASS TYPICAL SECTION POSTED AADT SPEED T.H. 3 A Minor Arterial two-lane undivided 45-55 mph 9,700 to (connector) to four-lane divided 12,700 160th Street West A Minor Arterial four-lane divided 14,200 o (CSAH 46) (expander) urban 55 mph 17,000 170th Street West two-lane undivided (CSAH 58) Collector(major) rural 55 mph 3,450 5,300 195th Street West/ A Minor Arterial two-lane undivided 40-55 mph to 190th Street West (expander) 8,200 CSAH 66 B Minor Arterial two-lane undivided 55 mph 3,450 (Vermillion River Trail) rural Elm Street B Minor Arterial two-lane undivided 30 mph 11,300 (CSAH 50) urban Akin Road Collector(major) two-lane undivided 45 mph 3,950 urban While the Diamond Path Road Extension is included in the AUAR,City staff will continue to review the feasibility of the road as this project moves forward. Diamond Path Road currently intersects 190th Street West approximately 3,700 feet east of Akin Road as a T- intersection. It is expected that daily traffic volumes on the Diamond Path extension could reach 7,000 to 8,000 vehicles per day within 20 years. HOURLY TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Multiple sources were used for intersection turning movement peak hour volumes for this study: the Minnesota Department of Transportation traffic counting program; the University of Minnesota UMore traffic impact study; and turning movement counts performed for this study.Figure 3 displays existing traffic volumes.These volumes can be found in the appendix. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes were retrieved from the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Office of Transportation Data and Analysis. 79 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY TH 3 & Elm Street (CSAH 50) is a signalized intersection with protected permissive phasing through flashing yellow arrow signal configuration for northbound and southbound left-turn phases. The eastbound right-turn movement is overlapped with the northbound left-turn phase. TH 3 & 160th Street (CSAH 46) is signalized with protected left-turns for all approaches.Both signalized intersections are actuated and run free. TH 3 & 190th Street, and Akin Road & 195th Street are single-lane roundabouts.All other Intersections are stop controlled. The geometric configuration of all intersections are shown in Figure 21-3, with the exception of Akin Road&195th Street,which was recently reconstructed as a roundabout. OTHER TRIPS The Traffic Impact Study for the UMore Park Sand and Gravel Resources Project was completed in September 2010 and examined the impacts of sand and gravel mining operations on several intersections, including TH 3 & 160th Street West. The estimated trips generated by that development affecting the intersection in year 2030 are included for the no-build and build scenarios in this study. Other properties in the study area include the Providence and Hometown developments. Providence is located on the corner of TH 3 & 190th Street West and will consist of 120 single-family homes. Hometown is located east of TH 3 and south of CSAH 66 and contains 27 single-family lots.Peak hour trips for those developments were estimated and applied to year 2031 volumes. 80 LEGEND o N XX/XX AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOWMES X,X%X I um' ei. ei V �� LANE .... CONFIGURATION t�48/72 257/3s5 EOM e J 1 1. — e...40/92 240/117-11:0 a i 10400 365/391= 1 NOT 50/123 FZ TOv ..N' N.l . ®N SCALE h M 01 N N., 30/74 .) 1. 44/7 D 4/16 81/44_41)1 ` .n 11/7 I 58 32/102 1 1 aN a N N \i `40/54 '" 2/8 J 1 11, 151/157 m l ..-0/0 now 1.27 O w t 13/34 149/51 109/171.—.1ri 1 I. 0/1—• 77/151 .N 62/147 0 l l 72/34 /9 i- 120/94 13,500 1 1f 66 Ch kli N N pM N NII GO Y a m o 35/16 ® Jill, 4-6106 110,8001 177/2849/55 l 11 21; MEI 87/180 ii A-f.i P. EXISTING VOLUMES AND LANE GEOMETRY FIGURE 21-3 SEED/GENSTAR AUAR UPDATE i Bonestroo CITY OF FARMINGTON Project 000141-11333 DATE: 24 JUNE 2011 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 BASE ASSUMPTIONS Intersection capacity analysis was conducted using Synchro/SimTraffic v7.0 for stop- controlled and signalized intersections. Roundabout intersections were analyzed using RODEL software.Trip generation was calculated using the latest edition of the Institute of Traffic Engineers(ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Existing signal timing and phasing data was provided by MnDOT. 2016 updates used Synchro/SimTraffic v9 stop-controlled and signalized Intersections. BACKGROUND GROWTH According to the revised AUAR, non-site traffic volumes are assumed to increase by 2 percent per year to account for other regional growth in the area. For the 2036 analysis,a 4% Increase was applied to all movements. This Is based off the latest MnDOT county projection factors. As mentioned previously, estimated trips from other sites(UMore sand and gravel mining trips, and the Providence and Hometown developments) are also included in year 2031 volumes. Future No-build volumes are shown in Figure 21-4. TRIP GENERATION The proposed development is expected to consist of single-family and multi-family residential,and a mix of commercial and office land uses. According to the proposed land use table, Low Density Residential (1.0 to 3.0 units per acre)will be the predominant land use for the project and consist of 513.2 acres.The Low- Medium Density Residential designates 3.0 to 5.5 units per acre and will occupy 45 acres. Medium Density Residential (5.5 to 14.0 units per acre) will have 120 acres. The development will also contain 254,000 square feet of retail and office space. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip generation software was used to develop the projected trips by this development. Table 21.02 contains the summary of the land uses and sizes used for trip generation. 82 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 TABLE 21.02 -ITE TRIP GENERATION AVERAGE WEEKDAY DRIVEWAY VOLUMES AM PEAK PM PEAK HOUR HOUR HE Land Use Land Size enter Exit Enter Exit Single Family Detached 210 1026 units 195 575 657 380 Housing Residential 230 1380 units 97 511 483 235 Condo/Townhome General Office Building 710 40,000 SF 54 8 10 50 General Office Building 710 40,000 SF 54 8 10 50 General Office Building 710 67,000 SF 84 12 16 77 Hardware/Paint Store 816 15,000 SF 0 0 34 39 Automobile Parts Store 843 15,000 SF 0 0 44 46 Convenience Market with Fueling Gasoline Pumps 853 4 33 33 38 38 stations Arts and Crafts Store 879 15,000 SF 0 0 43 50 Pharmacy/Drugstore with 881 11,000 SF 17 13 57 57 Drive-Thru Furniture Store 890 21,000 SF 3 1 5 5 Drive-In Bank 912 13,000 SF 90 71 168 168 Hair Salon , 918 2,000 SF 0 0 1 2 Quality Restaurant 931 10,000 SF 0 0 50 25 Fast-Food Restaurant with 934 3,000 SF 76 73 53 49 Drive-Thru Coffee/Donut Shop with 937 2,000 SF 113 109 43 43 Drive-Thru U adjusted,Weekday Trip. r115 414 an 1314 Internal Capture Reduction See Worksheet -86 -86 -138 -138 Total Driveway Volumes 730 1328 1574 1176 Pass-By Trip Reduction From ITE Manual -58 -57 -212 -201 Total New Peak Hour Trips to Adjacent Network 672 1271 1362 975 This mixed-use development generates "internal capture" trips summarized in the table above. Internal capture trip reduction is a method to estimate interaction between different land use types within the same development. While each land use in a mixed-use development generates vehicle trips, some individuals will visit more than one land use within the development. This phenomenon of multiple land uses adjacent to each other ultimately results in less vehicle trips to the external road network, and less impact, than free-standing retail,office,or residential areas.This reduction was calculated in accordance with the manual and the worksheet is included in the Appendix. 83 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Pass-by reductions are included to account for the phenomenon where land uses such as convenience stores or other similar uses attract vehicles whose ultimate destination is elsewhere. These driveway turning movement trips replace what would otherwise be "through"movements,but do not contribute to"new trips"on the roadway network. The proposed development generates 31,163 trips daily. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Trips for this proposed development were assigned to the surrounding roadway network based on the trip distribution determined as part of the Revised AUAR.The proposed trip distribution for this project can be found in Figure 21-5.Pass-by trips are shown in Figure 21-6,the projected site trips are shown in Figure 21-7. The previous AUAR developed traffic projections based on a fully constructed Diamond Path Road extension.Year 2021 forecasts for the study area are shown in Figure 21-7A as a comparison to this study's forecasts. Year 2031 full build traffic volumes without the Diamond Path Road extension are shown in Figure 21-8. 84 LEGEND XVXX AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES / UNE .. In _. n�� CONFIGURATION ,K CiS y .,_. .,_ 68/102 J1 l X372/507 a 59/131 336/164-� -a r 523/551.�-. 1 NOT 71/172- ,N o TO $i.-, .Nr, SCALE C,: 42/14 J m }6/10 1� r E 6/22 113/62,_41 L 1 15/10 I 58 45/143 1 n , 7...a n L V h.. a N 01 bNCP, n1 0 PZOC `56/7633/31 MOM 234/235 N 1 f-20/13 Wnt�ra.i J wdo IY-108/147 17/12 18/48 11"n209/71 162/267 1 r 7/24-+ t 108/2113.- &,c 89/211 NNn P rV 1 l 112/56 1 3._172/135 t r 66 $. P OO - O O M,, b ti g;::, 0 49/22 Jill }3/0 248/398 J a� r 122/252 ®. 13/77 -" N c o FUTURE NO-BUILD VOLUMES FIGURE 21-4 SEED/GENSTAR AUAR UPDATE 4 Bonestroo CITY OF FARMINGTON Profec[000141-11333 DATE: 24 JUNE 2011 LEGEND 21% — TRIPS IN(PERCENT) �11. TRIPS OUT(PERCENT) / PROPERTY ORIGIN/ x°'0 DESTINATION N e iii sr '''' •1r 5% <> ROADWAY ORIGIN/ 11'.-., DESTINATION 11%—7 1 t r NOT fe, TO .+atN SCALE 1 0 7% .11 r1'ia 581 pip, SEED/GENSTAR DEVELOPMENT •-•.n GI ACCESS A J 11.25%- 13.75°k a 8,. n n Nr. M v • J I I 10% ACCESS B 4.5% # I 5.5%�, 1 ® o r...—„q N ti J I I ACCESS C 10% 4.5% ` 5% 50°/ 5.5% 1 `10% ^ •-• ¢x-35% ^'M N 1 .....15% J 1 `3.5% J 1 4-3.5% JJ I *mina I-5% -28.5% .-13.5% 1.5%J 15%—0 13.5%—A 15%—. f 21.5%—+ 13.5%...... 24.75% lit 1 t 3.5%..... 13.75% e a L^'.ry N N 1 11 `2% 2% 1 66� 5% e O M ® J 30% I=10%� ii 2 • TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 21-5 SEED/GENSTAR AUAR UPDATE of Bonestroo CITY OF FARMINGTON Project 000141-11333 GATE:24 JUNE 2011 LEGEND )O(/)(X AM/PM PASS-8V TRIPS -X(/-XX AMREDUCTION/PM PASS-NY �► TURN MOVEMENTS NOT TO SCALE Min 58 SEED/GENSTAR DEVELOPMENT ACCESS A ACCESS B r•i• , J ACCESS C 9/32—� 20/70 1 w N rel a Uw c m p, r4 O Q Q 20/74 «—-20/-74 9/32- -9/-32 U 66 can fl PASS-BY TRIPS FIGURE 21-6 SEED/GENSTAR AUAR UPDATE Bonestroo CITY OF FARMINGTON Project 000141-11333 DATE: 24 JUNE 2011 LEGEND _y TRIPS IN(PERCENT) TRIPS OUT(PERCENT) / N 1 r 34/68 74/150—ti 1 f NOT gog TO $ -N$ SCALE - v 1 r 7/14 47/95 I ( 58 $es P C SEED/GENSTAR DEVELOPMENT 1 ACCESS A 143/110 1 175/134 1 m of N CO44 en 4- 0 0 ti N n N C JHti ACCESS B 57/44 1 1 70/54 nmm c n b N O b C J11 ACCESS C Mj 57/44 T 70/54-1 �pp b P V t Q G m M -- N b ZM N U `127/98 v a ^ 235/477 '�'�' —191/146 J` '�—24/48 J ` —24/48 J J 1 sizemf 64/49 .--362/278 172/132 10/20 1 101/204 91/184 1C1 204 -+ ( 192/388 91/184—0 315/241 1 MIMI 44/34 110 175/134— Q N O 01 N of N N 1 13/27 MOO 1 661 co LO Na In n Lel 1 67/136 MEI SITE TRIPS FIGURE 21-7 SEED/GENSTAR AUAR UPDATE q, Bonestroo CITY OF FARMINGTON Project 000141-11333 DATE! 24 LUNE 2011 0 Lr)0, t-0 1 L 3°4080450 j / 4-85 225 160TH STREET W I 305/150 1 is t r 490/475—+ 0 0 0 115/295 N U1 NO oov, 001111 0n "_O'-(22.500) M S0 o a; .-1010 4-5/10 NOT TO SCALE A)i L 4-15/35 170TH STREET W 140/45 1 w. t tw 5/10-i 8515' :nu, o E( ...i � 0n'A M Op] n N M M - 0) LEGEND: QNORTH ACCESS '" 1 _ xx/xx PROJECTED AM PEAK HOUR/PM PEAK a- 155/1051 q t HOUR VOLUMES 135/95- o0 z PROPOSED 09 �` (x,xxx) PROJECTED DAILY VOLUMES o 'nN -o SITE ---PROPOSED ROAD _Q a)0 SOUTH ACCESS d j 155/105-0 q t 155/105- o N'n \C WI n 0mv) v'na nn N m v 8L130/85 L215/150 J 1 �' 4180/75° 195TH STREET W -,-es,,-.. 4 365/255 _ — — } d 1 la, 4-210/140 ,� 215/145-p .1 1 r I 60/200--' n�n v� 15 35 1 t t 195/135 �N� 130/395—I. o0,n u��o 115/140 �`°r' `Ooo"' sn al �Z %� .` (24,300) CSAR 66 13 0 o 0 N o k-120/80 a I < 4100/100 Norm 4-140/100 _ ''! k. D C T 10/1/50 1 _ � �. �l.tJ. 1050/50 m�o v Ln 'n\o ��n 'n 'nom O1 '°n'vn. -65/20 d 1 V —9595 ELM STREET 345/6351 '% t re 45/60--.. 'noo 125/275 N'0" 0 0 - Nm FIGURE 21 -7A J/JjBonestroo Rosene CAI PROPOSED 2021 TRAFFIC VOLUMES Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects FARMINGTON AUAR/GENSTAR K:\141\14105264\Cad\Dwg\AUAR traffic figures.dwg LEGEND XX/XX AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES �� ii TURN o o- MOVEMENT m J 1 ` `68/102 . -372/507 T93/199 336/164 523/551—+ 1 1 r NOT 145/322 ti. 0 0 N SCALE $▪ ^m '^^' 14-42/14 J 1 6/10—12/36 113/62—L41' 4.�n 1s/10 58 92/238 1 , .c m M v b 4-7 N V N SEED/GENSTAR DEVELOPMENT to n o J ACCESS A 143/110 J 1 t 175/134 1 n v m' en N R O r0 �P .r , J1 ACCESS 8 57/44 J 1 t 70/54 n �$ m n t4,'P m G ti. b h n JI 0 ACCESS C 66/76 90/124 1 I.,I, YO lO w SO I, 0 n ...o CO L"A LI.I�± nM N garq '&m n n o L 183/173 Q .ni.Q a 'P"T'v" `33/31 J 1 1. —425/381 j ` `24/48 J L `255/551 J 1 ` -20/13 171/196 r 760/735 .—380/439 r 17/12 18/48 10/20 J 110/236 614/497..--1 262/472 1 1 r 486/815..... 431/493 7/24—. 1 1 r 108/211— v 0 m 264/345 G Na:2 a,•-• NO .1Z go 2 nv 1L k 125/83 0 172/135 Ir 66 m. o. ,• _ V'e °�o om.v. m'" v vI `49/22 1ilt .'''1. 1 ` e—85/50 t 3/0 315/534 1 / MEI 13/77-+ 1 122/252 n IN to 0 CO 1,2 FULL BUILD VOLUMES FIGURE 21-8 SEED/GENSTAR AUAR UPDATE #Bonestroo CITY OF FARMINGTON Project 000141-11333 DATE: 24 JUNE 2011 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY The Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) utilizes a term "level of service"to measure how traffic operates in intersections. There are currently six levels of service ranging from A to F. Level of service"A"represents the best conditions and Level of Service "F" represents the worst. Synchro software was used to determine the level of service for studied intersections. All worksheet reports from the analyses can be found in the Appendix. TABLE 21.03-HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL LEVELS OF SERVICE AND CONTROL DELAY SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION Level of Service Control Delay per Vehicle Level of Service Control Delay per Vehicle (sec) (sec) A s10 A s10 B > 10and s20 B > 10and s15 C >20and s35 C > 15and s25 D >35and s55 D >25and s35 E >55and s80 E >35and s50 F >80 F >50 Table 21.04 represents the summary of the overall intersection level of service analysis for this project. 91 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 TABLE 21.04-OVERALL LEVEL OF SERVICE(DELAY PER VEHICLE) YEAR 2031 YEAR 2031 EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTIONS NO-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM TH 3 & 160th Street D (38.3) C (34.8) D (42.1) D (38.4) D (49.1) D (50.7) (CSAR 46) TH 3 & 170th Street F (154.7) D (31.2) F (101.0) C (22.7) (CSAH 58) (EB left- (WB (WB (WB F (---) F (---) (unsignalized) turn) approach) approach) approach) TH 3 & 190th Street A (6.6) A (5.9) A (3.3) A (3.4) B (11.8) F(90.3) TH 3 &CSAH 66 (Vermillion River Trail) D (29.1) E (46.0) D (28.5) D (26.0) F (58.8) F (62.1) (unsignalized -WB approach) TH 3 & Elm Street B (14.3) B (19.9) B (18.0) C (26.8) C(20.5) C (34.6) (CSAH 50) Akin Road & 195th B (10.2) C (15.1) B (11.9) B (18.1) C (20.5) E (57.9) Street(CSAH 64) TH 3 &Access A (unsignalized-WB = _ F (52.5) F(274) left turn 7 TH 3 &Access B �` _. _ .�..:�,' # Sit (unsignalized -WB C (25.0) F (55.2) left turn 'h: TH 3 &Access C 3.., (unsignalized -WB i D (26.6) F (88.7) left turn TH 3 &Access D I :, B (14.8) B (14.3) (signalized) TH 3 &Access E I (unsignalized -SB E (39.8) F (72.0) =ice rY�' �: .+wm left turn Analysis shows that background growth in the study area require capacity improvements to the roadway network.To account for future growth as part of this study,TH 3 is analyzed as a divided four-lane highway. Also, analysis shows that the Akin Road & 195th Street intersection fails as an all-way stop during the PM peak hour by year 2031. The above LOS for the future scenarios (No-Build and Full Build) include the above improvements. Figure 9 displays LOS by movement for the Full Build scenario. 92 LEGEND AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES TURN MOVEMENT m w JD/E "13/8 r D/F DIE--, 1 � 1 D/E-► NOT B/C 1 U a TO LLom SCALE 5- 5 `F/F —F/F F/F F/F 1 _� F/F-+ 58 F/F-% SEED/GENSTAR DEVELOPMENT ACCESS A F/F B/D-N. ACCESS B C/F 1 ` B/C— 1 U ACCESS C D/F B/D-% U o m m0LL ULL yu QU U Li- 23. `A/A Lu? am Q rOF J 8/B A/A j D/A .usomoA/C1 A/A 1 B/C 1 A/C-� 1 r B/B-+ D/F-0 1 A/c ' m F/F r F/F 66 moo ago B/B J1L — —B/B B/B D/E 1 1 A/A t 1 -+ 1 A/A-% N U< as FULL BUILD LOS FIGURE 21-9 SEED/GENSTAR AUAR UPDATE Bonestroo CITY OF FARMINGTON Project 000141-11333 DATE: 24]UNE 2011 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 TH 3 (SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL) & 160TH STREET WEST (CSAH 46) TABLE 21.05 -INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE/DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 2011 2031 2031 DIRECTION MOVEMENT EXISTING NO-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM LT E/ 56.2/ D/ 54.7/ E/ 62.4/ E/ 57.8/ F/ 85.8/ E/ 69.1/ 457' 256' 673' 339' 789' 318' Eastbound TH D/ 35.9/ D/ 37.7/ D/40.8/ D/43.4/ D/ 50.0/ E/ 69.1/ 324' 350' 426' 474' 428' 580' RT B/ 11.1/ A/ 9.0/ B/ 10.6/ B/ 13.9/ B/ 11.7/ C/ 24.1/ 57' 90' 68' 153' 115' 312' LT D/ 39.9/ D/ 52.9/ D/ 42.8/ E/ 56.3/ D/ 50.2/ F/ 86.0/ 101' 214' 141' 285' 218' 502' Westbound TH D/ 41.0/ D/ 40.0/ D/ 49.6/ D/ 44.5/ D/ 54.1/ E/ 59.3/ 243' 328' 344' 448' 347' 488' RT B/ 12.5/ B/ 10.8/ B/ 11.3/ B/ 14.2/ B/ 11.4/ B/ 16.1/ 58' 70' 69' 104' 70' 112' LT E/ 57.0/ D/ 54.9/ E/ 65.4/ E/ 60.6/ F/ 80.7/ F/ 86.5/ 337' 188' 492' 248' 831' 540' Northbound TH D/ 37.4/ C/ 27.9/ D/ 36.9/ C/ 33.0/ D/ 38.4/ C/ 31.0/ 656' 331' 462' 278' 708' 408' RT B/ 13.0/ A/ 6.6/ B/ 11.2/ A/ 8.0/ B/ 15.2/ A/ 7.8/ 122' 42' 141' 59' 229' 86' LT E/ 56.3/ E/ 55.3/ E/ 65.0/ E/ 57.9/ E/ 68.3/ E/ 65.1/ 119' 175' 152' 226' 153' 226' Southbound TH D/ 38.5/ D/ 40.5/ D/ 43.1/ D/ 40.5/ D/ 50.6/ D/ 53.8/ 230' 675' 173' 529' 298' 856' RT A/ 9.7/ B/ 12.0/ B/ 10.3/ B/ 14.8/ B/ 10.4/ B/ 19.5/ 64' 154' 79' 228' 80' 287' TH 3 & 160th Street is a signalized intersection with protected left-turn phasing on all approaches. The eastbound and westbound approaches both consist of an exclusive left- turn lane, two through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches both have a left-turn lane, one through lane, and a right-turn lane. The intersection currently functions at an overall LOS D in the AM peak, and a LOS C in the PM peak. In the no-build scenario, the intersection would fail without intersection improvements. With a widened TH 3, including two through lanes both northbound and southbound, the intersection would function at overall LOS D in the AM peak, with the eastbound and northbound left-turn movements experiencing LOS E. In the PM peak hour, the intersection is also expected to see LOS D overall. Analysis shows that the EB approach would require dual left-turn lanes in the no-build scenario. 94 Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 In the full build scenario,the intersection would see LOS D in the AM peak,but is expected to fail in the PM peak with the increased traffic from development.Analysis shows that the intersection would benefit from EB dual left-turn lanes, but would also require NB dual left-turn lanes in the full build scenario. These results are consistent with 2036 traffic forecasts. Recommended improvements • TH 3 widening, including two through lanes in the NB and SB approach(No- Build), • EB dual left-turn lanes(No-Build) • NB dual left-turn lanes(Full Build) 95 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 TH 3 (CHIPPENDALE AVENUE) & 170TH STREET WEST (CSAH 58) TABLE 21.06 —INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE/DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 2011 2031 2031 DIRECTION MOVEMENT EXISTING NO-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM LT F/ 154.7/ C/ 21.8/ F/ 101.0/ C/ 18.1/ F/ ---- 317.8/ TH 312' 56' 329' 54' 900' Eastbound F/ RT F/ 154.7/ C/ 21.8/ F/ 101.0/ C/ 18.1/ F/ ---- 317.8/ 312' 56' 329' 54' 900' LT C/ 21.9/ D/ 31.2/ C/ 21.1/ C/ 22.7/ F/ Westbound TH 24' 29' 33' 28' 136.5/ F/ ---- RT 169' LT A/ 8.2/ -- A/ 9.5/ -- A/ 8.8/ - B/ 11.7/ B/ 11.0/ D/ 28.1/ 24' 54' 135' Northbound TH Free RT LT A/ 1.0/ -- A/ 0.3/ -- A/ 2.7/ -- A/ 0.2/ -- A/ 1.6/ -- A/ 0.7/ -- Southbound TH Free RT TH 3 & 170th Street is a two-way stop controlled intersection with 170th Street under stop control.The eastbound approach has an exclusive right-turn lane, and a shared through-left lane. The westbound approach consists of one lane. Northbound TH 3 has a left-turn lane, and southbound TH 3 has a right-turn lane. Analysis of existing conditions shows that the EB left-turn lane has difficulty finding gaps in traffic during the AM peak hour, and the WB approach experiences LOS D in the PM peak. In the no-build scenario, turning traffic from 170th Street would fail without intersection improvements. With a widened TH 3, including two through lanes both northbound and southbound, eastbound left-turning traffic would have difficulty finding gaps in traffic during the AM peak.The intersection would function acceptably during the PM peak hour. In the full build scenario, the increased traffic from full development would have greater impacts on 170th Street traffic, as well as northbound left-turning vehicles in the PM peak. It is reasonable to expect that signalization or roundabout control would be warranted with full build traffic volumes. These results are consistent with 2036 traffic forecasts. Empire Township is tentatively planning to install a single lane roundabout at this intersection. It is anticipated that this roundabout will be installed prior to full buildout of the AUAR area. Dedicated turn lanes for NB and SB with a protected phase for left-turning vehicles will need to be considered if the intersection is signalized. 96 Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 Recommended improvements • TH 3 widening, including two through lanes in the NB and SB approach (No- Build) • Signalize/roundabout when warranted (Build) • Dedicated left-turn lanes for NB and SB when warranted TH 3 (CHIPPENDALE AVENUE) & 190TH STREET WEST TABLE 21.07 —INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE/DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 2011 2031 2031 DIRECTION MOVEMENT EXISTING NO-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM LT Eastbound TH A/ 3.6/ -- A/ 4.8/ -- A/4.2/ -- A/ 7.8/ D/ 28.2/ F/ ---- 20' 220' RT LT Westbound TH A/ 4.8/ -- A/ 3.6/ -- A/ 7.2/ -- A/4.2/ -- D/20;2/ A/ 8.4/ -- RT LT Northbound TH A/ 8.4/ A/ 4.8/ A/ 3.0/ A/ 2.4/ A/ 5.4/ A/ 3.6/ 40' 20' 20' 40' 20' RT LT Southbound TH A/ 3.6/ -- A/ 7.2/ A/ 1.8/ -- A/ 3.0/ A/ 2.4/ A/ 7.8/ 40' 20' 20' 100' RT TH 3 & 190th Street West is a single lane roundabout. Analysis of existing conditions shows that the intersection functions at LOS A overall in both peak hours. All individual approaches experience LOS A. In the no-build scenario, the intersection would fail without intersection improvements. With a widened TH 3, including a two-lane approach both northbound and southbound that continues through the roundabout, the intersection would see LOS A in both peaks, with all approaches expected to function at LOS A. In the full build scenario, the increased traffic from full development results in lower LOS in the AM peak, and failure for eastbound traffic in the PM peak. A two-lane approach in the eastbound direction will be required. The analysis of 2036 traffic forecasts also shows that a dual left-turn will be needed for the EB approach. A two lane approach for the WB will also be required. 97 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Recommended improvements • TH 3 widening, including two lane approaches in the NB and SB approach(No- Build) • Improvement to a multi-lane roundabout with 2 lanes for NB and SB movements (No-Build) • A free right turn for the SB approach when warranted • Two-lane EB approach with dual left turns when warranted (Full Build) • Two-lane WB approach when warranted 98 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 TH 3 (CHIPPENDALE AVENUE)& CSAH 66 (VERMILLION RIVER TRAIL) TABLE 21.08 —INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE/DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 2011 2031 2031 DIRECTION MOVEMENT EXISTING NO-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM Westbound �{ D/29.1/ E/46.0/ D/28.5/ D/26.0/ F/ 58.8/ 62.1/ 141' 149' 196' 128' 346' RT 279, Northbound TH RT Free LT A/8.6/-- A/8.7/-- A/9.6/-- A/ 10.0/-- B/ 10.5/— B/28;0// Southbound TH Free TH 3 &CSAH 66 is a stop controlled intersection with CSAH 66 under stop control.The WB approach consists of a single lane. There is a private business with driveway on the west side of the intersection, but this driveway has not been analyzed for capacity. Northbound consists of a through lane and a right-turn lane. Southbound has a left-turn lane and a through lane. Analysis of existing conditions shows that the WB approach sees LOS D in the AM peak, and LOS E in the PM peak. In the no-build scenario, the intersection would fail without intersection improvements. With a widened TH 3,including a two-lane approach both northbound and southbound that continues through the roundabout,the intersection would see LOS D in both peak hours. In the full build scenario,the increased traffic from full development results in failure for WB traffic in both peaks. Capacity improvements such as an exclusive left-turn lane has minimal positive affect.It is reasonable to expect that this intersection would meet warrants for signalization or roundabout control. These results are consistent with 2036 traffic forecasts. Recommended improvements • TH 3 widening, including two lane approaches in the NB and SB approach(No- Build) • Exclusive WB right-turn lane plus signalization or roundabout control when warranted(Full Build) 99 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 TH 3 (CHIPPENDALE AVENUE) &ELM STREET(CSAR 50) TABLE 21.09 -INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE/DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 2011 2031 2031 DIRECTION MOVEMENT EXISTING NO-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM LT C/ 26.1/ C/ 34.6/ D/35.6/ D/46.0/ D/40.6/ E/ 57.5/ 197' 357' 306' 621' 463' 839' Eastbound TH A/7.3/ B/ 10.1/ A/7.2/ RT N 7.1/ 56' 114' N 6.3/67' 200' A/ 5.8/68' 155' LT B/ 15.4/ B/ 13.5/ B/ 16.5/ B/ 13.3/ B/ 15.5/ B/ 11.4/ Westbound TH 92' 60' 131' 75' 135' 68' RT LT C/29.0/ D/37.6/ D/35.3/ D/52.5/ D/42.0/ F/88.8/ 166' 236' 245' 378' 275' 436' Northbound TH A/9.4/ B/ 12.7/ B/ 11.9/ B/ 16.3/ B/ 14.3/ C/21.5/ 135' 157' 216' 238' 277' 354' RT N 0/-- A/0/-- N 0/-- A/0/-- A/0/-- A/0/- D/35.7/ D/40.3/ D/37.5/ D/40.6/ LT C/28.3/-- 35, C/33.8/-- 44' 20' 44' Southbound THB/ 17.0/ C/24.0/ C/22.3/ C/32.9/ C/26.0/ D/41.3/ 94' 233' 160' 347' 257' 432' RT A/4.7/82' N 5.8/ A/ 5.9/ N 6.5/ A/6.4/ B/ 10.7/ 90' 104' 104' 120' 191' TH 3 &Elm Street is a signalized intersection with protected permissive phasing through flashing yellow arrow signal configuration for northbound and southbound left-turn phases.The EB approach has a left-turn lane and a shared right-through lane. Its right-turn is overlapped with the NB left-turn phase.The WB approach consists of a single lane.The NB and SB approaches consist of a left-turn lane,two through lanes and a right-turn lane. Analysis of existing conditions shows that the intersection functions at LOS B in both peak hours. In the no-build scenario,the intersection would see LOS B in the AM peak hour,and LOS C in the PM peak.The EB left-turn movement would see LOS D and long queues.EB dual left-turn lanes would provide capacity for this movement. In the full build scenario,the increased traffic from full development would increase delay and queues. The EB dual left-turn lane improvement provides enough capacity for the intersection to function acceptably. These results are consistent with 2036 traffic forecasts. Recommended improvements • EB dual left-turn lanes(No-Build) 100 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 AKIN ROAD& 195TH STREET(CSAH 64) TABLE 21.10 -INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE/DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 20362036 FULL 2036 full build 2011 BUILD Expanded DIRECTION MOVEMENT EXISTING Single lane roundabout roundabout AM PM AM PM AM PM LT A/8.0/ C/ 17.9/ 84' 161' Eastbound -11-1B/ 11.4/ Cl 20.3/ A/ 7.2/ 149.4/ B/ 10.2/ A/40 6/ 84' 161' 20' 40' 40 RT A/4.7/ B/ 13.5/ 84' 161' A/9.8/ B/ 14.9/ LT 89' 100' C/ B/ B/ Westbound B/ 14.3/ C/ 19.0/ 23.4/ 10.8/ A/ 6.0/ - 18.6/ 89' 100' 120' 20' - 120' RT A/6.7/ A/9.3/ 45' 46' LT B/ 10.4/ B/ 12.8/ 37' 42' A/ 7.8/ B/ A/ 7.8/ B/ B/ 11.4/ B/ 13.9/ 17.4/ 12.0/ Northbound TH 62' 83' 20 162' 20 20' RT A/ 8.7/ A/8.9/ 47' 43' A/Southbound LT 9.2/ B/ 13.6/ 40' 57' A/9.6/ B/ A/9.6/ B/ TH A/9.9/ B/ 14.8/ 20' 19.2/ 20, 19.2/ 56' 91' 60' 120' RT A/8.7/ B/ 11.4/ 40' 54' Akin Road & 195th Street West was an all-way stop controlled intersection. The EB approach has had a right-turn lane and a shared through-left lane. The WB approach consists of a single lane. The NB approach consisted of a left-turn lane and a shared through-right lane,and the SB approach has had a right-turn lane and a shared through-left turn lane. Akin Road Elementary School is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection. Since the 2011 AUAR, the intersection was converted to a single lane roundabout. In the 2036 full build scenario,with single-lane roundabout control,the intersection would see LOS B in the AM peak,and LOS E in the PM peak,with some movements expected to see failing conditions. A right-turn bypass lane would be required for the EB and WB approaches. With the addition of these bypass lanes,the intersection is expected to see LOS A in the AM peak,and LOS B in the PM peak. 101 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Recommended improvements • EB and WB right-turn bypass lanes(Full Build) 102 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 TH 3(CHIPPENDALE AVENUE)&ACCESS A TABLE 21.11 —INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE/DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 2011 2031 2031 DIRECT/ON MOVEMENT EXISTING NO-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM F/52.5/ F/ LT 186' 274.0/ 350' gin Eastbound ;; a ., , ..;..,, ;,N , ham _.,, >.._ta _€,: _._._. -tt. B/ 12.8/ D/25.5/ RT 50' 94' LT A/9.9/-- D/31.0/ 154' Northbound TH Free «m - Southbound TH Free RT Access A is the northern-most access point to the development.For the full build scenario, this access point would connect to the future Dakota County east-west corridor which would provide access to TH 3.The driveway to the future east-west corridor would consist of a left-turn lane (If westbound access is authorized)and a right-turn lane.TH 3 would be a four-lane divided highway,with a NB left-turn lane,and a SB right-tum lane to the future east-west corridor.The access would be stop-controlled. Analysis shows that left-turning vehicles out of the development would have difficulty fmding a gap in TH 3 traffic in both peak hours.It is reasonable to expect that this driveway would warrant signalization or roundabout control with full build traffic volumes. These results are consistent with the 2036 analysis. Recommended improvements • Develop plan for connection between AUAR area and east-west corridor with future traffic study 103 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 TH 3(CHIPPENDALE AVENUE)&ACCESS B TABLE 21.12 —INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE/DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 2011 2031 2031 DIRECTION MOVEMENT EXISTING NO-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM LT ---- _C/25.0/ F/55.2/ 41' 70' Eastbound WM----° .'; RT --_— B/ 12.2/-- C/29,9// LT _--- 10.0/-- C/37'7/ Northbound TH ---- Free } ---- Southbound cam., TH ---- Free u, RT _--- Access B is the driveway located between Access A and Access B on TH 3. For the full build scenario, the driveway would consist of a left-turn lane and a right-turn lane. TH 3 would be a four-lane divided highway, with a NB left-turn lane, and a SB right-turn lane. The access would be stop-controlled. Analysis shows that left-turning vehicles out of the development would experience LOS C in the AM peak,and have difficulty finding a gap in the PM peak hour.This driveway may warrant signalization or roundabout control with full build traffic volumes. These results are consistent with the 2036 traffic forecasts. Recommended improvements • Signal or roundabout control if warranted(Full Build) 104 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 TH 3(CHIPPENDALE AVENUE) &ACCESS C TABLE 21.13 —INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 2011 2031 2031 DIRECTION Moverewr EXISTING No-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM LT ---- D/50' / F/88.7/ 6 7/ Eastbound 17 25 _,: ---- - RT B/ 12.3/-- D/85.0/ LT B/ 10.0/-- C/52'3/ Northbound TH ---- Free Thi, ''_---- p� 74 Southbound TH —_-- RT ---- Free Access C is the southern-most driveway located to the development on TH 3. For the full build scenario, the driveway would consist of a left-turn lane and a right-turn lane. TH 3 would be a four-lane divided highway,with a NB left-turn lane, and a SB right-turn lane. The access would be stop-controlled. Analysis shows that left-turning vehicles out of the development would experience LOS D in the AM peak,and have difficulty finding a gap in the PM peak hour.This driveway may warrant signalization or roundabout control with full build traffic volumes. These results are consistent with the 2036 analysis. Recommended improvements • Signal or roundabout control if warranted(Full Build) 105 Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 190TH STREET WEST&ACCESS D TABLE 21.14 —INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 2011 2031 2031 DIRECTION MOVEMENT EXISTING NO-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM B/ 18.0/ C/31.8/ LT 116' 300' EastboundTH B/ 19.2/ B/ 14.3/ 359' 344' B/ 17.0/ B/ 12.9/ Westbound TH 307' 294' RT A/4.9/82' 017/ LT B/ 19.1/ q 24.9/ 370' 360' Southbound , ,i«« - RT N 3.0/ 53' A/ 2/ Access D would be the main development driveway providing access to the commercial area on 190th Street. For analysis purposes, this access would be signalized. The EB approach would have a left-turn lane and a through lane, and the WB approach would consist of a through lane and a right-turn lane. The driveway exit would have a left-turn lane and a right-turn lane. A northbound approach for this intersection has not been analyzed. The area south of the intersection is proposed for residential development and will be connecting to this Intersection with a northbound approach as Its primary entrance/exit. When 195th/190th Street was connected to TH 3, right and left-turn lanes were built on the eastbound and westbound approaches for this future intersection. With the turn lanes already in place, the addition of the northbound approach and its expected utilization,should have only a nominal effect on the LOS of the Intersection. Under signalized control, this intersection would see LOS B in the AM peak, and LOS C in the PM peak hour. It should be noted that this access would also function acceptably as a roundabout. These results are consistent with the 2036 analysis. Recommended improvements • Signal or roundabout control(Full Build) 106 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 195TH STREET WEST&ACCESS E TABLE 21.15 -INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE/DELAY PER VEHICLE/95TH QUEUE 2011 2031 2031 DIRECTION MoverIeirr EXISTING NO-BUILD FULL BUILD AM PM AM PM AM PM LT ---- A/9.7/-- A/ 9.8/-- Eastbound TH ---- Free Westbound TH -_ Free RT -�-_ LT ---- E/ 69' 52'39.8/ F/ 72.0/ Southbound RT ---- C/ 15.5/-- C/ 15.0/-- Access E is the western-most driveway to the property on 195th Street. For the full build scenario,the driveway would consist of a left-turn lane and a right-turn lane. 190th Street would have an EB left-turn lane, and a WB right-turn lane. The access would be stop- controlled. Analysis shows that left-turning vehicles out of the development would experience LOS E in the AM peak,and have difficulty finding a gap in the PM peak hour.This driveway may warrant signalization or roundabout control with full build traffic volumes. These results are consistent with the 2036 traffic forecasts. Recommended improvements • Signal or roundabout control if warranted(Full Build) Figure 21-10 shows a graphical summary of recommended improvements. The following improvements have been added to the 2016 AUAR update,and are not included on Figure 21-10: • At full build, EB for 190th St at TH3 will require a dual left and the WB approach will need to be two lanes • 195th St at Akin Rd is currently a roundabout,and at full build will require dedicated right-turn lanes for EB and WB • At full build,NB and SB of TH 3 at 170th St will need dedicated left-turn lanes 107 LEGEND y EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION NO-BUILD IMPROVEMENTS FULL BUILD IMPROVEMENTS J111 010, 1 fir 400 NOT TO SCALE 11 1tr 58 SEED/GENSTAR DEVELOPMENT 11 ACCESS A it u ACCESS B it u ACCESS C tt 0 Li _ u L1 �' „ J11. " 11 am -- 11r it rt r 66 Jill. .- -v 1itr 13112 fl RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE 21-10 SEED/GENSTAR AUAR UPDATE Bonestroo CITY OF FARMINGTON Project 000141-11333 DATE; 24]UNE 2011 Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 22. Vehicle Related Air Emissions Provide an estimate of the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discus the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. (If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed). An air quality study was prepared for the original AUAR based on post-development traffic generation projections and utilizing EPA air models appropriate for the time. The model output is presented in Appendix D. The study concluded that all predicted carbon monoxide ambient air quality values within the AUAR area would be within the Minnesota ambient standards.This analysis was utilized in subsequent revisions of the AUAR.Changes to the air quality analysis since the 2011 AUAR Update are noted in bold. Carbon monoxide(CO) levels are often elevated near roadway intersections due to the emission of this pollutant from the vehicles idling and passing by.The State of Minnesota has ambient CO standards that are designed to protect human health and the environment. The Standards are: • 1-hour average: 30 parts per million(ppm);and • 8-hour average: 9 ppm. Concentrations near or above these levels are most likely to occur near intersections that are severely congested(Levels of Service D,E or F)and have high traffic volumes.Since the 2011 AUAR Update,the Minnesota Department of Transportation has developed a screening method designed to identify intersections that may cause a CO impact above the State standards.This method requires an intersection to be heavily congested(Level of Service F)and have a traffic volume of greater than 140,000 vehicles per day in order to be considered to have the potential for causing CO air pollution problems. None of the intersections in the AUAR area exceed the criteria that would lead to a violation of the air quality standards.The highest volume intersections have volumes around 3,000-4,000 vehicles in the peak hour.With a K-factor of 0.10,this translates into a daily volume of approximately 40,000 vehicles per day,which is lower than the threshold of 140,000 vehicles(see Section 21 for detailed traffic information). 109 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 23. Stationary Source Air Emissions Will the project involve any stationary sources of air emissions(such as boilers or exhaust stacks)? Yes X No Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EAW Guidelines for a listing)and any greenhouse gases(such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone-depleting chemicals (cloro fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbon or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. 24. Dust, Odors,Noise Will the project generate dust, odors, or noise during construction and/or operation? X Yes No If yes, describe the sources, characteristics, duration, and quantities or intensity, and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also idents the locations of sensitive receptors in the vicinity and estimate the impacts on these receptors. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life. Minnesota Rules Chapter 7030 provide the Minnesota standards for noise.These standards describe the limiting levels of sound established on the basis of present knowledge for the preservation of health and welfare.These standards are designed to be consistent with sleep, speech,annoyance,and hearing conservation requirements for receivers within areas grouped according to land use activities.The Minnesota standards are as follows: 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM Lio Lso Lio Lso NAC-1 (Residential) 65 60 55 50 NAC-2(Commercial) 70 65 70 65 NAC-3 (Industrial) 80 75 80 75 Lio means the sound level which is exceeded for 10 percent of the time for a one-hour period. Lso means the sound level which is exceeded 50 percent of the time for a one- hour period. Sound levels are expressed in dBA.A dBA is a unit of sound level expressed in decibels and weighted for the purpose of determining the human response to sound. 110 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Minnesota Statutes, Section 116.07, Subd.2a, exempt noise from local and county roads from the requirements of these noise rules unless full control of access to the road has been acquired. Existing Noise Levels In order to define existing project-area noise levels, SBP conducted monitoring at the following four locations: • 125 feet from the center of TH 3, at the Southern Hills Golf Course. • 100 feet from the center of 170th Street,near the rail crossing. • Western terminus of 194th Street. • Eastern terminus of 195th Street. Results of the monitoring are as follows: Table 24-1 Noise Monitoring Results Date Time Llo L50 Rl -Golf Course 11/15/02 12:30— 1:30 p.m. 65.0 56.5 R2— 170th Street 11/15/02 1:44—2:44 p.m. 65.5 55.5 R3— 194th Street Terminus 12/10/02 2:53—3:25 p.m. 45.0 42.5 R4— 195th Street Terminus 12/10/02 3:49—4:22 p.m. 53.0 48.5 The monitoring locations are shown in Figure 3-1.Detailed graphical summaries of all monitoring results are provided in Appendix A. Post-Development Noise Levels Using the Minnoise computer model and traffic and roadway information provided by Bonestroo,Rosene,and Anderlik Associates(BRA), SBP estimated post-development noise levels generated by traffic on roadways serving the project area.Noise impacts were estimated for hypothetical receptor locations at 50 foot intervals from 50 to 400 feet from the center of the following roadways: • TH 3 • 195th Street Extension • 170th Street Minnoise Model The Minnoise model is a modified(modified by the Minnesota Department of Transportation)version of the Federal Highway Administration's Optima/Stamina model that is used to predict noise levels from highway projects and to assist with the development of noise barriers. 111 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Model Assumptions Noise level predictions were based on the following data and assumptions: • The noise analysis was completed for the peak afternoon rush hour. • Traffic data for year 2013 for the study was generated by BRA and is provided in Appendix B. • Shielding from natural or man-made barriers was not considered. • The analysis assumed acoustically soft ground cover between the roadway and all receiver locations(alpha=0.5). • Vehicle mix was based on counts conducted during noise monitoring,with 3 percent heavy trucks and 14 percent medium trucks. • Constant vehicle speeds of 45 mph on Chippendale Avenue and 40 mph on other roads was assumed. 112 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 "�}a do til . 'IAS:.•••.':••• as A mow, — _ _ . � in!'w ER e.. 1/y 44' 'a' pi pi, C1 p1! ,U" VS i0 0 442 1,0 IC. vi i 05 IA'�YiG. IVY '4` :�O'. '!�•' • �fl'•:.•,•.:,."�'.,.,','�'. •,In `C r'a vi, :m• . N . . .� •. �D: 1 . !w - F • v 0 81-§ W B «, u is 4e4 Ze 0292;.: '' . . 115 t.' a 1 z 4 4 4 4 ' 6 -8 4— 1 77' � � H• am._ i � mllkUlhcLIca ..9 °' 113 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Model Results • Daytime Noise Levels Table 3-2 shows the results of the modeling analysis for the peak daytime hour. The model results show that,without any intervening terrain or barriers, state daytime noise levels may be exceeded to distances of approximately 400 feet from the centerline of Chippendale Avenue, out to approximately 200 feet from 170th Street, and out to approximately 100 feet from the 195th Street extension.The State daytime standard is based on the suitability of an area for outdoor use. Complete model output files are provided in Appendix C. • Nighttime Noise Levels Minnesota noise rules define nighttime as the hours between 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m. The nighttime standards(Lio=55 dBA,Lso=50 dBA)are designed to prevent interference with sleep in a building with partially open windows.Peak nighttime traffic noise levels typically occur during the 6:00 a.m.—7:00 a.m.hour. Assuming traffic levels of about 70 percent of the peak daytime hour traffic levels,traffic noise levels of 1 —2 dBA less than the peak daytime levels presented in Table 3-2 can be expected. Railroad Noise A CP Rail line runs through the proposed development site.According to MNDOT,the track is used primarily by Union Pacific,with an average use of 10 trains per day at 45 mph.In order to evaluate the noise impact of this rail line, SBP used the methodology prescribed by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) in"The Noise Guidebook", (September 1991 HUD-953-CPD(1)).HUD requires that projects developed with HUD assistance evaluate expected project noise levels at residences and compare them to HUD standards. HUD Standards are expressed in a descriptor called the"day-night average sound level", abbreviated as DNL and symbolized as Ldn".The descriptor represent a 24-hour average noise level with a 10 decibel penalty added to the nighttime hourly noise levels.The HUD standards are presented on the table that follows: 114 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 HUD SITE ACCEPTABILITY STANDARDS DNL Special approvals and requirements Acceptable Not exceeding 65 dB(1) None Normally Unacceptable Above 65 dB but not Special Approvals exceeding 75 dB Environmental Review Attenuation Unacceptable Above 75 dB(1) Special Approvals Environmental Reviews Attenuation Notes: (1) Acceptable threshold may be shifted to 70 dB in special circumstances.The attenuation measures in Unacceptable cases are granted on a case-by-case basis. In conducting the impact assessment for this project, SBP used the following assumptions: • 50 cars per train • 2 diesel locomotives per train • Average train speed of 45 mph • Bolted tracks(not welded) • Night operations(10:00 p.m.to 7:00 a.m.)are 15 percent of the 24-hour total SBP used the HUD methodology to define the extent of the"Unacceptable"and "Normally Unacceptable"zones for 10(current number)and 20 trains per day and for areas where whistles are used(defined as areas perpendicular to any point on the track between the whistle posts).The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 3-3. Table 24-3 Railroad Noise Impact No Whistle Zone Whistle Zone Extent of Unacceptable Extent of Extent of Extent of Zone Normally Unacceptable Normally Unacceptable Zone Unacceptable Zone Zone 10 Cars Less than 50 feet from 100 feet from 50 feet from track. 300 feet from per Day track. track. track. 20 Cars Less than 50 feet from 200 feet from 100 feet from track. 500 feet from per Day track. track. track. The HUD worksheets used in this determination is provided in Appendix D. 115 Farmington Seed/Genstar A UAR Update December 2016 Mitigation Plan Protect residential areas from potential noise impacts generated by roadways and the railroad tracks. 1. Conduct a detailed noise study of the proposed site plan to define any required noise mitigation strategies. Potential strategies may include one or a combination of the following: o Buffer zones o Noise barriers o Strategic building placement o Building construction requirements 25. Nearby Resources Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site: a. archaeological, historical, or architectural resources? X Yes_No b. prime or unique farmlands? Yes X No c. designated parks, recreation areas, or trails? X Yes No d. scenic views and vistas? Yes X No e. other unique resources? Yes X No f. If any items are answered Yes, describe the resource and idents any impacts on the resource due to the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. Archeological,Historical and Architectural Resources The Minnesota Historical Society indicated that there is one history/architecture property, the Dakota County Poor Farm, which is included in their statewide inventory (DK-EMP-002). The property has not been evaluated. The MHS suggested that the property be evaluated for National Register eligibility by a qualified historian. If eligible,the appropriate treatment of the property should be included as part of the Mitigation Plan and development planning process. Property buildings on the Dakota County Poor Farm site were demolished under authority of a demolition permit issued in February 2010. All buildings on-site were removed and the site was backfilled at that time. 116 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 The MHS indicated that an archaeological survey of the project area is not necessary. The State Archaeologist Indicated during review of this update that Archaeological site 21 DK0076 is located within the proposed development area. It is located on a prominent landform common in the area designated "Grassland Tree Complex"in Figure 10-1. Mitigation Plan Goal 1. Assure proper investigation of archaeological resources. Before any disturbance of areas designated as"Grassland Tree Complex"in Figure 10-1 where a previous archaeologic site has been identified, a qualified archaeologist will perform a survey to determine if the project could result in adverse effects to currently unknown archaeological resources. Responsible Parties:City of Farmington,private developer Regulatory Program:Minnesota Field Archaeology Act implementation Timeframe:as development is proposed Designated Parks,Recreational Areas and Trails The Jim Bell Park and Preserve,established in 2001,is located immediately west of the AUAR area. The park features picnic areas, a playground, trails and natural areas. In 2010,the City of Farmington acquired a parcel immediately east of the Jim Bell Park and Preserve,in the southwestern most part of the AUAR area.This parcel has been zoned park and open space by the City Council. However, the parcel is currently being used for active agriculture,with a lease that will expire in 2018. It is the City's intention to expand the Jim Bell Park and Preserve and develop their parcel as parkland.A master plan for this park was developed in 2007 is included in Figure 6-1. Several existing city trails run through and along the borders of the AUAR study area.These trails are part of a city-wide network, connecting different residential neighborhoods to the downtown.Within the AUAR study area,trails run: • South on Chippendale Avenue (TH 3) from 190th Street (construction on this segment is currently occurring in 2016) • From Chippendale Avenue(TH 3)west along 190th Street,continuing onto 195th Street • A loop trail south of 195th Street between Deerbrook Path on the west and North Creek on the east.This loop trail connects with the trail along 195th Street and is designated by the city as part of the North Creek Regional Trail. The Metropolitan Council identifies existing and planned regional parks and trails in the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan. Within the AUAR area, the Metropolitan Council identifies one planned regional trail:the North Creek Greenway Regional Trail.This 14-mile trail will connect Eagan,Apple Valley, Lakeville, Farmington and Empire Township. Although small segments of the trail within the AUAR area have already been developed by the City of Farmington,the entire trail will ultimately 117 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 be part of the Dakota County trail system.The North Creek Greenway Master Plan, which includes implementation strategies for the trail, was adopted by Dakota County in 2011 and approved by the Metropolitan Council in 2012. All existing and planned parks and trails are illustrated in Figure 25-1. Mitigation Plan Goal 1: Ensure that future development is integrated with existing and planned parks,especially the Jim Bell Park and Preserve. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington and Developer Regulatory Program:City site plan review process(as described in the City's Code§10-6-23). Development Time Frame:As development is planned. Goal 2:Integrate new development with the City's existing trail network. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington and Developer Regulatory Program:City site plan review process(as described in the City's Code§10-6-23). Development Time Frame:As development is planned. 118 N 1 I •• S 1 1 1 • 1mii - I . i 1 v. j Creek \ \ 1 j i 1 i I i I j North Creek Greenway i I ,� O—s ee 1 N.N... ,, ,2...., , (9_, :F. -1 1 IGD i:a 789th - i• •• ilt • • 1 I '` 1 *. i �. li • -1 • • • =i Jit =ell Park and Preserve • "' "' "' "' 194th St W Farmir'g onn Pres. a j`• i ' 1 • Planned y Creek City of Farmington Greenway Regional Trail Parks 7ikili4f, Seed-Genstar City Paved Trail Study Area Boundary Stantec i6 _` AUAR-Update 2016 •-••-• : m North Creek Regional Trail L••_•a City Boundary Feet `''�°"' Existing and Planned Streams Parcels 1 Parks and Trails January 2017 1,200 0 1,200 Figure 25-1 V:\1938\active\193803747\GIS\Projects\Fig 25-1 ParksRec.mxd Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 26. Visual Impacts Will the project create adverse visual impacts? (Examples include: glare from intense lights; lights visible in wilderness areas; and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks.) Yes X No If yes, explain. 2 7. Compatibility with Plans 2016 AUAR Update • Proposed development is consistent with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and the 2007 Master Plan for the Jim Bell Park and Preserve, as described in section 6. Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive land use plan or any other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local,regional, state or federal agency? X Yes No If yes, identify the applicable plan(s), discuss the compatibility of the project with the provisions of the plan(s),and explain how any conflicts between the project and the plan(s)will be resolved. If no, explain. The AUAR must include a statement of certification from the RGU that its comprehensive plan complies with the requirements set out at 4410.3610, subpart 1. The AUAR document should discuss the proposed AUAR area development in the context of the comprehensive plan. If this has not been done as a part of the responses to items 6, 9, 19, 22, and others, if must be addressed here; a brief synopsis should b presented here if the material has been presented in detail under other items. Necessary amendments to comprehensive plan elements to allow for any of the development scenarios should be noted. If there are any management plans of any other local, state, or federal agencies applicable to the AUAR area, the document must discuss the compatibility of the plan with the various development scenarios studied, with emphasis on any incompatible elements. Compatibility with Plans and Land Use Regulations The City of Farmington updated its comprehensive plan consistent with the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements for 2008 plan updates.This plan was reviewed by the Metropolitan Council and found to be consistent with the Regional Blueprint and with the Metropolitan Council's regional systems plans. In April 20, 2009, the City of Farmington officially adopted its Comprehensive Plan as official public policy. This plan complies with the requirements set out in Minnesota Rules 4410.3610, subpart 1, which requires local comprehensive plans to address land use, transportation and sanitary sewer systems. 120 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 The response to question 6 regarding a detailed description of the AUAR is in the context of the City of Farmington's Comprehensive Plan and takes into consideration amendments to the City's official controls or Zoning Ordinance. 28. Impact on Infrastructure and Public Services Will new or expanded utilities, roads, or other infrastructure, or public services be required to serve the project? X Yes No If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure/services needed. (Any infrastructure that is a "connected action" with respect to the project must be assess in this E 4 W;see "EAW Guidelines"for details.) This item should first of all summarize information on physical infrastructure presented under other items(such as 6, 18, 19, and 22). Other major infrastructure or public services not covered under other items should be discussed as well—this includes major social services such as schools,police, fire, etc. As noted above and in the "EAW Guidelines,"the RGU must be careful to include project-associated infrastructure as an explicit part of the AUAR review if it is to be exempt from project-specific review in the future. The infrastructure (roads, utilities, etc.) required to serve the project are detailed under the appropriate items in this AUAR. These include Question 13 (Water Use/Water Supply), Question 18 (Surface Water Runoff), Question 19 (Wastewaters), Question 21 (Solid Wastes), Question 22(Traffic). Infrastructure needed to support the proposed development is included in the City of Farmington's Capital Improvement Plan(C1P). The following summarizes the infrastructure system information: Roadway Network The Seed/Genstar AUAR identified the need for an east-west connection through the AUAR to State Highway 3. Since the 2006 Update the two-lane segment of 195th Street was completed in 2009. This 2011 Update to the AUAR analyzed the potential traffic and other environmental impacts of the completion of this new roadway and related roadways. The extension of 195th Street has been completed from its current easterly terminus at Diamond Path Road westerly to Trunk Highway 3. The roadway includes a bridge over North Creek and the Canadian Pacific Railway as a key component of the project. The bridge minimizes environmental impacts to the creek and wetland when compared with other design alternatives for the roadway. 121 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 The proposed development of the Seed/Genstar property will increase the traffic volumes on roadways within the site vicinity. The traffic analysis indicated the improvements and mitigation strategies that will be needed to accommodate the increased traffic. Improvements would include widening TH3 to a four-lane section in the area, signalization or roundabout control for several intersections that are currently stop- controlled,and additional lanes or turn lanes on other roadways in the area. The 2004 AUAR and the City's Comprehensive Plan includes the potential extension of Diamond Path Road through the AUAR area. While Diamond Path is included in the AUAR,City Staff will continue to review the feasibility of the road as this project moves forward. The Mitigation Plan discusses phasing the improvements in several increments through the year 2021 to accommodate the proposed development in the AUAR area and surrounding areas. Sanitary Sewer System The study area is currently not served by sanitary sewer. An addendum to the City of Farmington's May 1996 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan was prepared in early 2002 that incorporates trunk sewer service to the study area. The proposed trunk sewer system is shown if Figure 19.1. It consists primarily of gravity trunk sewers with one lift station and force main. Metropolitan sewer service will be provided to the study area by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) existing 48-inch Apple Valley Interceptor. This interceptor currently bisects the AUAR study area, which is fully within current MUSA staging areas for the City of Farmington. This interceptor will convey the wastewater to the Empire Wastewater Treatment Plant. Municipal Water System The City of Farmington currently has eight municipal wells, designed to meet the City's water demands until at least the year 2020. Water supply trunk lines will be added in the AUAR study area to connect the area to the City's current water supply system. These trunks will range in diameter from 16 to 20 inches. A 5.0-million gallon ground storage water reservoir is proposed within the AUAR study area. This ground storage reservoir is primarily intended to expand the City's water storage capacity to accommodate for peak demand as the community grows.Ultimately,the size of this future storage facility may be adjusted based on actual community growth. The source of water for the area will be the City of Farmington's current municipal wells completed in the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer. Development of the area will likely require additional pumping of the City's current wells to meet proposed demand, and the water supply system was design to meet this projected demand. 122 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Stormwater System Stormwater from the majority of the AUAR study area will drain to North Creek,a tributary of the Vermillion River. Two smaller subwatersheds within the AUAR area drain directly to the Vermillion River. Development in the AUAR study area will be required to meet NPDES permit standards adopted by the MPCA in August,2003 for areas that drain to Special Waters. Meeting this standard for the AUAR project area is expected to provide adequate protection to North Creek regarding runoff volume,thermal loads,and other runoff- driven pollutants. Meeting the standard will reduce runoff volume and pollutant loads below those generated by the existing conditions on the site. The standard used for the AUAR was actually higher than the standard adopted by the MPCA in August,2004 (after the AUAR was adopted),so the system proposed for the area will exceed the level of protection required to meet state rules. Compliance with the MPCA standard requires wide-spread application of infiltration approaches to control runoff volume and associated pollutant loads for the development intensity proposed. These approaches and the stormwater management system for the AUAR area are detailed in Section 17 and the Mitigation Plan. c. Information about the anticipated staging of various developments, to the extent known, and of the infrastructure, and how the infrastructure staging will influence the development schedule. The AUAR Study Area has been fully annexed. The AUAR Study Area is included in a proposed Growth Area and within the MUSA boundaries identified in the City of Farmington Comprehensive Plan Update. The area is expected to be developed by a single developer as a Planned Unit Development, however no formal development proposals has been submitted to the City for formal review. Development is expected to be staged over more than 10 years, and will depend on market conditions. 29. Related Developments; Cumulative Impacts This item does not require a response for an AUAR since the entire AUAR process deals with cumulative impacts from related developments within the AUAR area. However, the questions of this item should be answered with respect to the cumulative impacts of development within the AUAR boundaries compared with past,present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects outside of the AUAR area, where such cumulative impacts may be potentially significant. The Traffic Section discusses the potential cumulative impacts of development within the AUAR area with current and foreseeable projects in nearby areas, including new developments in Empire Township. The identified cumulative impacts from related developments are the potential impacts of increasing traffic on Trunk Highway 3. These 123 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 impacts are analyzed in the Traffic Section, and mitigation strategies are proposed to address the potential impacts. The AUAR Mitigation Plan proposes a phasing of this development, in order to minimize these impacts and phase the developments with potential improvements that will help to manage traffic on Highway 3. The Mitigation Plan describes a variety of improvements to be completed at intersections on related roadwaysto mitigate for traffic created by the proposed development. The City of Farmington has also indicated its willingness to work with MnDOT,Dakota County,and other communities in the Trunk Highway 3 corridor,to help to develop a long-term solution to the impacts of development in Dakota County on this roadway. 3 0. Other Potential Environmental Impacts If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts, which were not addressed by items 1 to 28, idents them here, along with any proposed mitigation. None identified. 31. Summary of Issues List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is commenced. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. The Mitigation Plan that follows identifies the issues that might impact the AUAR Study Area and the mitigation steps to be taken. 124 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Mitigation Plan - Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update This is the Final Mitigation Plan for the Seed/Genstar AUAR Update. It incorporates the Final Mitigation Plan from the Seed/Genstar AUAR, and adds comments on completed mitigation efforts that address the potential impacts from the proposed roadway changes proposed in the 2006 and 2011 AUAR Update. 1.0 Introduction This comprehensive environmental protection plan has been prepared as a part of the Farmington Seed/Genstar Alternative Urban Areawide Review(AUAR)Update. This plan is intended to satisfy the AUAR rules that require preparation of a"mitigation plan"that specifies measures or procedures that will be used to avoid, minimize, or mitigate for potential impacts of development of the AUAR area. Finally,the plan specifies legal and fmancial measures and institutional arrangements that will assure that the mitigation measures recommended in the plan are implemented. The mitigation plan will be used by the City of Farmington to guide development of the Seed/Genstar AUAR area through the avoidance,minimization, and/or mitigation of environmental impacts. NOTE:SECTION NUMBERS IN THE MITIGATION PLAN CORRESPOND TO THE SECTION NUMBERS IN THE AUAR REPORT. Items added for the 2016 AUAR Update are Included In bold Century Gothic type. 125 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 10. Cover Types—Natural Communities The majority of land cover in the AUAR study area is currently agricultural cropland and pasture land. The natural communities in the study area include wetlands and natural areas within the North Creek corridor. Wetlands. The Farmington Surface Water Management Plan (1997) and Surface Water Plan Update(2002)identify the wetlands in the AUAR area,and include a field inventory and wetland classification. The classification of wetlands in the AUAR area is based on the same functions and values assessment used to classify wetlands in the rest of the City, and considers native plant community quality and susceptibility to stormwater impacts. North Creek Corridor. The City's Comprehensive Plan identifies the North Creek Corridor as and "environmentally sensitive area". The plan and city ordinances include strategies for preservation of this corridor by restricting development within the floodplain and requiring undisturbed vegetative buffers around wetlands. The Dakota County Farmland and Natural Area Protection Plan (2002) also identifies the North Creek corridor as a "priority natural corridor"in the county. The goals and strategies that follow are proposed to protect the quality of the natural communities that remain on the Seed/Genstar property as development occurs in the future. Goal 1:Protect the natural communities and habitat connections within the North Creek Greenway Corridor. Protection Strategies: 1. Implement provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Surface Water Management Plan, Wetland Ordinance, and Shoreline Ordinance to protect the natural areas in the North Creek Corridor by prohibiting development within the corridor and floodplain areas, and requiring vegetated buffers along the creek and wetlands in the corridor. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington and private developer. Regulatory Program: Enforcement of City Ordinances and policies. The City may also apply to non-regulatory programs such as DNR's Metro Greenways and Conservation Partners programs to seek funding assistance for protection and restoration of natural communities. Implementation Time Frame: Enforcement of Ordinances and policies will occur with development. 2. The City will support efforts to remove exotic species and restore native vegetation in the buffer areas along North Creek to improve water quality and habitat. 126 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Responsible parties: City of Farmington, Natural Resource Agencies, volunteer groups Regulatory program: None. Implementation Time Frame: As grant programs,volunteers,or other resources are available for these efforts. 3. The City will implement the alignment option for the 195th Street Extension recommended in the Feasibility Report for the project(January, 2006),and shown in Figure 10.3, including the wetland and floodplain mitigation and banking proposed in the Feasibility Report for the project(January, 2006)to minimize and mitigate for potential impacts to wetlands and floodplains in the project area. Responsible parties: City of Farmington, Natural Resource Agencies, developer and contractors Regulatory program: Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, state and federal floodplain regulations, City Wetland, Floodplain and Stormwater ordinances, NPDES permit. Implementation Time Frame: Completed with construction of 195th Street. 4. The City will implement the North Creek Channel Rehabilitation included in the Feasibility Report for the 195th Street Extension project(January,2006),and shown in Figure 10.3 to minimize and mitigate for potential impacts to North Creek and its habitat from the extension of 195th Street. Responsible parties: City of Farmington, Natural Resource Agencies, developer and contractors Regulatory program: DNR permits, City Wetland, Floodplain and Stormwater ordinances,NPDES permit. Implementation Time Frame: Completed with construction of 195th Street. Goal 2:Protect healthy individual trees and groves of trees within existing woodland areas, and mitigate for any loss of trees through replanting. Protection Strategies: 1. Implement the vegetation preservation and protection plan and tree preservation requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington and private developers. Regulatory Program: City Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances. 127 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Implementation Time Frame: Tree protection plans should be developed along with grading plans for the development. Protection and replacement should occur as the development plan is implemented. Goal 3:Protect wetland resources in the project area to assure no net loss of these resources by avoiding and minimizing wetland impacts when feasible, and mitigating for unavoidable impacts, Protection Strategies: 1. The developer will follow the requirements of the Farmington Surface Water Management Plan and Wetland Ordinance, and applicable state and federal regulations to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate for impacts to wetlands that result from development. Responsible Parties: Private developers, City of Farmington, and regulatory agencies. Regulatory Program: Farmington Surface Water Management Plan, Wetland Ordinance, Shoreland Ordinance, Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, and Minnesota DNR Protected Waters Program. Implementation Time Frame: Complete analysis of wetland impacts and mitigation needs as final plat and grading plan are completed. Implement efforts to avoid or mitigate for impacts as development occurs. 2. The City will implement the alignment option for the 195th Street Extension recommended in the Feasibility Report for the project(January,2006),and shown in Figure 10.3, including the wetland and floodplain mitigation and banking proposed in the Feasibility Report for the project(January, 2006)to minimize and mitigate for potential impacts to wetlands and floodplains in the project area. Responsible parties: City of Farmington, Natural Resource Agencies, developer and contractors Regulatory program: Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, state and federal floodplain regulations, City Wetland, Floodplain and Stormwater ordinances, NPDES permit. Implementation Time Frame: Completed with construction of 195th Street. 3. Site plans will indicate methods that will be used to avoid impacts to wetlands and meet the requirements of the wetland regulations. Required buffers around wetlands will be clearly delineated with permanent monumentation acceptable to 128 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 the City. In residential subdivisions,a monument is required for each lot. In other situations, a monument is required for each 300 feet of wetland edge. Responsible Parties: Private developer and City of Farmington. Regulatory Program: Same as 1.above. Implementation Time Frame: Wetlands were delineated prior to development. Monuments will be placed as development occurs. 4. Require the use, management and enforcement of Best Management Practices (BMP's) to control erosion and sedimentation and provide pretreatment of water discharged to wetlands during and after construction, as specified in the City's Surface Water Management Plan. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington. Regulatory Program: City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, Wetland Ordinance, Excavation and Grading Ordinance and Grading Plan Requirements, and NPDES Stormwater Management Program. Implementation Time Frame: Specify BMP's to be used in grading plans, and implement BMP's as development occurs. 129 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 11. Fish, Wildlife and Sensitive Resources The Minnesota County Biological Survey identified no rare or threatened species in the AUAR study area during their countywide inventory. Based upon a review of the MDNR Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS database) under license agreement LA-760, there are no known records of state-listed species within the AUAR study area. However, the review indicated there are three known occurrences of rare species and natural communities within one mile of the AUAR study area. Goal 1. Protect the natural areas and habitat connections in the North Creek Greenway and the water quality and habitat in North Creek as development occurs in the AUAR area,through the strategies identified in Section 10 above and Section 17. Goal 2. Minimize Impacts to unmaintained grassland areas within the AUAR study area as much as possible to limit impacts to loggerheads shrikes and their habitat.The Information provided by the MDNR on shrike habitat will be provided to the developer. Goal 3. Construction activities in grasslands, roadsides, shrublands, wetlands, or woodlands (natural habitats) within the AUAR study area may result in the taking of migratory birds, eggs, young and/or active nests. If rare or state-listed species are determined to be present in a field study conducted within the year prior to development, removal of vegetation in natural habitat will occur outside of the anticipated migratory bird nesting window in Minnesota(i.e.,mid-March to August 15)to minimize the potential take of migratory birds. Goal 4. Best management practices during construction activities and operation within the AUAR study area will be implemented to minimize the introduction or spread of noxious weeds and invasive species at the site,especially along the North Creek Greenway. 130 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 12. Impacts on Water Resources No changes in mitigation plan strategies for the 2016 AUAR Update compared to the 2011 AUAR Update.As the AUAR area develops,wetlands and water resources will be protected and managed in accordance with the City's 2008 Local Surface Water Management Plan as well as watershed and State requirements. Stormwater BMPs will be Implemented to satisfy City,watershed,and State requirements. BMPs will be designed in accordance with the recently-adopted NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall amounts and distributions. Such BMPs could include stormwater storage for rate control;infiltration,filtration,bioretention,or stormwater reuse for volume control and water quality treatment;and temporary erosion and sediment control features such as vegetative restoration, storm drain Inlet protection, construction entrance protection,and silt fence. Water resources in the AUAR study area include North Creek and a variety of wetland types. Protection Strategies under Sections 10, 11, 16 and 17 in this AUAR Update will be implemented to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts on the Water Resources in the study area. The Vermillion River Watershed Management Plan notes that North Creek is fed by shallow ground water flows. The infiltration and wetland protection strategies proposed in Sections 10, 11 and 17 should help to maintain shallow ground water resources in the AUAR area. In addition,the following strategies are included: Goal 1.Protect ground water resources that support flows in North Creek. Protection Strategies: 1. The City will avoid construction of utilities in close proximity to North Creek when feasible. When utility construction near the creek is necessary, require use of trench dams or other barriers, and backfilling of utility trenches with native material to prevent drainage of shallow groundwater in the area. 2. The City will consider the use of directional boring techniques in the construction of water distribution and sanitary sewer collection lines that are proposed to cross under North Creek. Responsible parties: City of Farmington Regulatory program: MPCA Best Management Practices Implementation time frame: Implement as utilities are constructed in the AUAR area. 131 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 13. Water Use Since the AUAR area has historically been used for farming and rural residences, it is possible that some private wells are located in the project area, though the Minnesota Geological Survey's County Well Index for Dakota County indicates no well records within the boundary of the project area. However, the possibility exists that unsealed, abandoned wells may be encountered after construction begins. Goal 1. Protect the quality of ground water in the AUAR area. Protection Strategies 1. Require that unsealed,abandoned wells are properly sealed and abandoned to meet codes required by Dakota County. Responsible parties: City of Farmington, private developer and property owners Regulatory program: Dakota County Implementation time frame:As development occurs. 14. Land Use Management Districts Goal 1. Protect existing floodplain areas from impacts of the proposed roadways. 1. The City will implement the alignment option for the 195th Street Extension recommended in the Feasibility Report for the project(January,2006),and shown in Figure 10.3, including the wetland and floodplain mitigation and banking proposed in the Feasibility Report to minimize and mitigate for potential impacts to wetlands and floodplains in the project area. Responsible parties: City of Farmington, Natural Resource Agencies, developer and contractors Regulatory program: Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, state and federal floodplain regulations, City Wetland, Floodplain and Stormwater ordinances, NPDES permit. Implementation time frame: Completed with construction of 195th Street. 132 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 16. Erosion and Sedimentation No changes in erosion and sedimentation issues for the AUAR study area compared to the 2011 AUAR Update.As the AUAR study area develops,temporary erosion and sediment control features will be implemented to satisfy City,watershed, and State requirements. Such features could include vegetative restoration, storm drain inlet protection,construction entrance protection,and silt fence. Goal 1.Minimize erosion and sedimentation and impacts on surface waters as development occurs. Protection strategies: 1. Identify and protect areas of existing native vegetation,and minimize soil exposure during development. 2. Use created storm water ponds as sediment basins during construction. 3. Implement the City's Erosion Control and Turf Establishment Ordinance. Work with the grading contractor to ensure that these practices are implemented,and that contractors follow the City's erosion and sediment control requirements. 4. Implement the Additional BMP's included in the MPCA's NPDES Permit for Special Waters(August,2003). 5. Employ inspectors on site to ensure that Best Management Practices and City Ordinances are implemented. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington,private developers. Regulatory Program: City Ordinances, and Grading Plan Requirements. Implementation Time Frame: Developer approach and use of BMP's should be specified in grading plan. Adoption and enforcement of BMP's should occur throughout the development process. 133 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 17. Water Quality—Surface Water Runoff No changes in mitigation plan strategies for the 2016 AUAR Update compared to the 2011 AUAR Update. As the AUAR area develops, surface water runoff will be managed in accordance with the City's 2008 Local Surface Water Management Plan as well as watershed and State requirements. Stormwater BMPs will be implemented to satisfy City, watershed, and State requirements. BMPs will be designed in accordance with the recently-adopted NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall amounts and distributions. Such BMPs could include stormwater storage for rate control;Infiltration,filtration,bioretenfion,or stormwater reuse for volume control and water quality treatment;and temporary erosion and sediment control features such as vegetative restoration, storm drain inlet protection, construction entrance protection,and silt fence.Goal 1: Protect the water and habitat quality of North Creek to meet or exceed applicable MPCA water quality standards. Protection Strategies: 1. The City of Farmington will work with the developer to identify and consider strategies to infiltrate and detain stormwater to reduce runoff to protect North Creek. Infiltration strategies will be considered in areas where Hydrologic Soil Groups A and B have been identified by the Dakota County Detailed Soil Survey. The City's P.U.D. ordinance allows for modifications through its design review process to accommodate a variety of strategies to infiltrate or detain stormwater and meet the identified performance standard. The following strategies will be considered for use where feasible in the AUAR area: • Reduce residential street widths to reduce impervious surface coverage • Use vegetated islands within cul de sacs designed to hold stormwater • Provide small scale infiltration areas such as "rainwater gardens" and /or larger regional infiltration basins • Use cluster development that maintains open space, minimizes impervious surfaces, and protects soils with high infiltration rates, so that drainage may be directed to these areas • Encourage homeowners to direct downspouts from roofs over yards or other vegetated areas or into rain barrels, and away from driveways or paved surfaces • Encourage plantings of native vegetation on public and private properties to slow and capture runoff and encourage infiltration • Infiltration strategies will also help to maintain the quantity and quality of shallow ground water flows that sustain North Creek • In planning areas where shallow ground water prevents the use of infiltration as a stormwater management strategy, consider use of shaded swales or other strategies to control the temperature of runoff before it reaches North Creek. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington,private developers, MPCA. Regulatory Program: MPCA Water Quality Standards. 134 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Implementation Time Frame: Identify strategies to implement these plans as a part of the final plat and grading plan; implement strategies as development occurs. 2. In areas where Hydrologic Soil Groups C and D have been identified by the Dakota County Detailed Soil Survey,infiltration is not an effective strategy for managing surface water runoff volumes. (These soil types are concentrated in the southwest portion of the AUAR study area;see Figure 17-2.) In these areas, the following strategies will be considered to manage surface water runoff and protect the quality and water temperature of North Creek: • Filtration strategies such as swales and"rainwater gardens"may be used to protect water quality • Where ponds are required to manage water quality and quantity, and protect the creek from high flows, water will be discharged where possible through shaded swales, channels or pipes to cool the water temperature before it reaches the creek. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington,private developers,MPCA. Regulatory Program: MPCA Water Quality Standards. Implementation Time Frame: Identify strategies to implement these plans as a part of the final plat and grading plan; implement strategies as development occurs. 3. Implement provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Surface Water Management Plan, Wetland Ordinance,and Shoreline Ordinance to protect the natural areas in the North Creek Corridor by restricting development within the corridor and floodplain areas, and requiring vegetated buffers along the creek and wetlands in the corridor. Responsible Parties:City of Farmington and private developer. Regulatory Program: Enforcement of City Ordinances. The City may also apply to non-regulatory programs such as DNR's Metro Greenways and Conservation Partners programs to seek funding assistance for protection and restoration of natural communities. Implementation Time Frame: Enforcement of Ordinances will occur with development. Restoration activities may be completed as resources are available. 4. The developer will follow the requirements of the Farmington Surface Water Management Plan and Wetland Ordinance, and applicable state and federal regulations, to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate for impacts to wetlands that result from development. 135 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Responsible Parties: Private developer, City of Farmington, and regulatory agencies Regulatory Program: Farmington Surface Water Management Plan, Wetland Ordinance, Shoreland Ordinance, Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, and Minnesota DNR Protected Waters Program. Implementation Time Frame: Complete analysis of wetland impacts and mitigation needs as final plat and grading plan are completed. Implement efforts to avoid or mitigate for impacts as development occurs. 5. Require the use, management and enforcement of Best Management Practices (BMP's) to control erosion and sedimentation and provide pretreatment of water discharged to wetlands during and after construction, as specified in the City's Surface Water Management Plan. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington Regulatory Program: City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, Wetland Ordinance, Excavation and Grading Ordinance and Grading Plan Requirements,and NPDES Phase II Stormwater Management Program. Implementation Time Frame: Specify BMP's to be used in grading plans, and implement BMP's as development occurs. 6. The Minnesota DNR and Vermillion River Watershed JPO should continue monitoring efforts on North Creek and the Vermillion River, including biomonitoring through the River Watch program,flow monitoring,and electro- fishing and stream temperature studies to identify any significant changes as development occurs in the AUAR area. Responsible Parties: Minnesota DNR and VRWD Regulatory Program: Vermillion River Watershed Management Plan Implementation Time Frame: Existing monitoring should be continued. 136 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 20. Solid Wastes;Hazardous Wastes;Storage Tanks Goal 1. Protect future site occupants and the natural environment from the presence of past contamination. Protection Strategies: 1. If soil contamination is discovered through a due diligence process or during the course of development,the developer or other responsible party will be required to appropriately mitigate the contaminants according to the type of development planned and in compliance with MPCA rules and Dakota County ordinance. 2. Location of future storage tanks and businesses that produce,store,or use hazardous materials and/or petroleum products will consider the sensitivity of the area geology and avoid locations where sensitivity is high,depth to bedrock or groundwater is shallow,or the area overlaps with the City of Farmington's Drinking Water Supply Management Area. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington,private developers,MPCA. Regulatory Program: MPCA guidelines and Dakota County Ordinance 110. Implementation Time Frame: Implement strategies as development occurs. 137 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 21. Traffic This study serves as an update to the previous traffic impact study performed for the AUAR approved by the Met Council on January 20, 2004. This update includes a more detailed breakdown of land uses,which provides a better estimate of development-generated trips. The previous AUAR also assumed an extension of Diamond Path Road, as well as 208th Street. These extensions are not included in this study. Also, this analysis includes three site accesses on TH 3,and two accesses on 190th/195th Street. It should be noted that an extension of Diamond Path Road has been platted to extend north to 189th Street West. Although not currently programmed, the Diamond Path Road extension, if constructed, is expected to reach 7,000 to 8,000 daily trips within 20 years. The Diamond Path Road extension may be an important north-south collector roadway in the future.The City will continue to review this connection as the project progresses. This analysis examined current traffic volumes on the study intersections,and determined necessary improvements based on capacity analysis for future year 2031 conditions. The proposed development generates 31,163 trips daily. Subtracting pass-by trips and internal capture,the development generates 672 entering and 1,271 exiting trips in the AM peak hour, and 1,362 entering and 975 exiting trips in the PM peak hour. Analysis shows that background growth in the study area, without traffic from the Seed/Genstar property, require capacity improvements to the roadway network by year 2036.TH 3 will be overcapacity and requires widening north of Elm Street.Also,analysis shows that the Akin Road & 195th Street intersection fails as an all-way stop during the PM peak hour by year 2031. With development trips, there are additional capacity improvements needed. Since the analysis year 2036 is twenty years away, it is recommended to perform future studies as each phase of development occurs to more accurately determine the appropriate type of improvements as well as timing of construction. The following summarize improvements required for the No-Build Condition: Overall • TH 3 widening to a four-lane section with turn lanes. TH 3 & 160th Street West(CSAH 46) • Eastbound dual left-turn lanes. TH 3 & 190th Street West • Improvement to a multi-lane roundabout with 2 lanes for NB and SB through movements. 138 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 TH 3 &Elm Street(CSAH 50) • Eastbound dual left-turn lanes Akin Road& 195th Street West(CSAH 64) • Signalized or roundabout control when warranted(completed in 2009) The following summarize improvements required for the Full Build Condition. Before any Improvements are made,they will be evaluated against current traffic conditions and updates to the City and County's planned roadway network. TH 3 & 160th Street(CSAH 46) • Northbound dual left-turn lanes. TH 3 & 170th Street(CSAH 58) • Signalized or roundabout control when warranted. • Dedicated left-turn lanes for NB and SB when warranted. TH 3 & 190th Street • Two-lane eastbound approach with dual left turns when warranted. • Two-lane westbound approach when warranted. TH 3 &CSAH 66(Vermillion River Trail) • Exclusive westbound right-turn lane plus signalized or roundabout control when warranted. Akin Road& 195th Street West(CSAH 64) • Eastbound and westbound free right turn lanes when warranted. The following summarize recommendations for the property accesses. TH 3 &Access A Develop plan for connection between AUAR area and east-west corridor with future traffic study TH 3 &Access B • Right-turn and left-turn lane on the driveway exiting the development. • Right-turn and left-turn lanes on the major roadway entering the development. • Signalized or roundabout control if warranted. TH 3 &Access C 139 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 • Right-turn and left-turn lane on the driveway exiting the development. • Right-turn and left-turn lanes on the major roadway entering the development. • Signalized or roundabout control if warranted. 190th Street&Access D • Right-turn and left-turn lane on the driveway exiting the development. • Right-turn and left-turn lanes on the major roadway entering the development. • Signalized or roundabout control. 195th Street&Access E • Right-turn and left-turn lane on the driveway exiting the development. • Right-turn and left-turn lanes on the major roadway entering the development. • Signalized or roundabout control if warranted. It is important to note that residential development reaches occupancy over a period of time,unlike retail land uses,which generate traffic on opening day.For this property, it is recommended to signalize or construct a roundabout for opening day for the 190th Street &Access D intersection because this driveway will accommodate most of the commercial traffic. It is recommended to phase-in signalization or roundabout control for the other accesses as residential occupancy increases and ultimately meet warrant thresholds. 24. Dust, Odors,Noise Goal 1: Protect residential areas from noise impacts from roadways and the railroad tracks. 1. Conduct a detailed noise study of the proposed site plan to define any required noise mitigation strategies. Potential strategies may include one or a combination of the following: o Buffer zones o Noise barriers o Strategic building placement o Building construction requirements o Encourage the Minnesota Department of Transportation to design landscaping or other strategies to reduce noise levels to homes along State Highway 3 that may be affected by noise levels at full- proposed development of this roadway. Responsible Parties: Minnesota Department of Transportation, City of Farmington. Regulatory Program:Minnesota Statutes Section 116.07. 140 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 Implementation Time Frame: As roadway is designed and constructed, estimated to occur from 2010-2020. 2. Enforce State Air Quality Standards to regulate air emissions in the development area. Responsible Parties: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Regulatory Program: Indirect Source Permit Program. Implementation Time Frame: Regulations are currently in effect. Enforce during site development. 3. Implement Best Management Practices to minimize dust during and after construction of developments and infrastructure in the AUAR area. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington,private developer. Regulatory Program: City Subdivision Regulations Implementation Time Frame: Implement existing regulations as development occurs. 4. Regulate hours when construction may occur to control construction noise. Responsible Parties: City of Farmington Regulatory Program: None Implementation Time Frame: Control as development occurs. 25a. Archaeological,Historical and Architectural Resources Goal 1: Assure proper investigation of archaealoaical resources. Before any disturbance of areas designated as"Grassland Tree Complex"in Figure 10-1 where a previous archaeologic site has been Identified, a qualified archaeologist will perform a survey to determine if the project could result in adverse effects to currently unknown archaeological resources. Responsible Parties:City of Farmington,private developer. Regulatory Program:Minnesota Field Archaeology Act. Timeframe:as development is proposed. 141 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 25c.Designated Parks,Recreational Areas and Trails Goal 1: Ensure that future development Is integrated with existing and planned parks, especially the Jim Bell Park and Preserve. Responsible Parties:City of Farmington and Developer Regulatory Program:City site plan review process(as described in the City's Code§10-6-23). Development Time Frame:As development is planned. Goal 2:Integrate new development with the City's existing trail network. Responsible Parties:City of Farmington and Developer Regulatory Program:City site plan review process(as described in the City's Code§10-6-23). Development Time Frame:As development is planned. 142 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 ADOPTED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLANS AND REGULATIONS The City of Farmington has a variety of plans, ordinances and regulations in place that address environmental issues in the proposed development area. These mechanisms will be enforced and amended as indicated in the Mitigation Plan to provide a comprehensive framework and set of tools to protect the natural resources of the area as development occurs: City Comprehensive Plan Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances(includes Tree Planting Requirements) Open Space Zoning/Cluster Zoning Excavation and Grading Ordinance No. 1549 Stormwater Management Plan and Ordinances Floodway Ordinances Shoreland Management Ordinance Wetland Conservation Act Water Supply and Distribution Plans Comprehensive Greenway and Park Plans Individual Sewage Treatment System Ordinance Wellhead Protection Ordinance 143 Farmington Seed/Genstar AUAR Update December 2016 APPENDICES UPDATE 144 Traffic Volumes ( ) op 100 iv sOga DE5 (95gRaNNs fflgag19.N TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION-METRO TH-3 at CSAH-66/Vermillion River Trail File Name : TH-3 at CSAH-66 Vermillion Riv Trl 2009 Ref.Pt.: 026.643 Farmington Site Code : 00000000 JAMAR# D4-3365 CH Start Date : 5/20/2009 TURN MOVEMENT COUNT Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Cars&Trucks TH-3/Chippendale Ave. CSAH-66/Vermillion River Trail TH-3/Chippendale Ave. Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time , Left I Thru I Right I Peds Left I Thru I Right I Peds Left I Thru I Right I Peds Int.Total 06:00 3 21 0 0 13 0 9 0 0 61 8 0 115 06:15 2 47 0 0 21 0 15 0 0 88 9 0 182 06:30 1 50 0 0 27 0 17 0 0 105 13 0 213 06:45 2 66 0 0 41 0 13 0 0 112 6 0 240 Total 8 184 0 0 102 0 54 0 0 366 36 0 750 07:00 1 88 0 0 34 0 27 0 0 112 17 0 279 07:15 1 69 0 0 29 0 14 0 0 105 20 0 238 07:30 5 56 0 0 30 0 16 0 0 151 15 0 273 07:45 5 98 0 0 27 0 15 0 0 102 23 0 270 Total 12 311 0 0 120 0 72 0 0 470 75 0 1060 08:00 3 46 0 0 17 0 9 0 0 87 12 0 174 08:15 1 50 0 0 33 0 17 0 0 81 17 0 199 08:30 3 64 0 0 21 0 12 0 0 87 10 0 197 08:45 4 75 0 0 22 0 1 0 0 66 22 0 90 Total 11 235 0 0 93 0 39 0 0 321 61 0 760 15:00 8 91 0 0 17 0 3 0 0 75 18 0 212 15:15 10 96 0 0 26 0 1 0 0 78 20 0 231 15:30 10 89 0 0 26 0 7 0 0 93 23 1 249 15:45 8 106 0 0 17 0 5 0 0 92 27 0 255 Total 36 382 0 0 86 0 16 0 0 338 88 1 947 16:00 9 127 0 0 23 0 6 0 0 87 27 0 279 16:15 14 117 0 0 13 0 8 0 1 115 27 0 295 16:30 11 110 0 0 14 0 6 0 0 102 36 0 279 16:45 14 146 0 0 18 0 6 0 0 110 35 0 329 Total 48 500 0 0 68 0 26 0 1 414 125 0 1182 17:00 10 118 0 0 32 0 5 0 0 96 24 0 285 17:15 17 126 0 0 19 0 11 0 0 86 30 0 289 17:30 18 140 0 0 25 0 12 0 0 97 27 0 319 17:45 15 135 0 0 33 0 7 0 0 80 23 0 293 Total 60 519 0 0 109 0 35 0 0 359 104 0 1186 Grand Total 175 2131 0 0 578 0 242 0 1 2268 489 1 5885 Apprch% 7.6 92.4 0 0 70.5 0 29.5 0 0 82.2 17.7 0 Total% 3 36.2 0 0 9.8 0 4.1 0 0 38.5 8.3 0 t,ei,.., iii of ,k slaiv rose a oEyei e.g. lia.vs iagj9A TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION-METRO TH-3 at CSAH-66/Vermillion River Trail File Name : TH-3 at CSAH-66 Vermillion Riv Trl 2009 Ref.Pt.: 026.643 Farmington Site Code : 00000000 JAMAR# D4-3365 CH Start Date : 5/20/2009 TURN MOVEMENT COUNT Page No : 2 TH-3/Chippendale Ave. CSAH-66/Vermilion River Trail TH-3/Chippendale Ave. Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I Peds I App.Tome Left I Thru I Right I Peds I App.Total Left I Thru I Right I Peds I App.Total Int Total I Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 07:00 1 88 0 0 89 34 0 27 0 61 0 112 17 0 129 279 07:15 1 69 0 0 70 29 0 14 0 43 0 105 20 0 125 238 07:30 5 56 0 0 61 30 0 16 0 46 0 151 15 0 166 273 07:45 5 98 0 0 103 27 0 15 0 42 0 102 23 0 125 270 Total Volume 12 311 0 0 323 120 0 72 0 192 0 470 75 0 545 1060 %App.Total 3.7 96.3 0 0 62.5 0 37.5 0 0 86.2 13.8 0 PHF .600 .793 .000 .000 .784 .882 .000 .667 .000 .787 .000 .778 .815 .000 .821 .950 TH-3/Chippendale Ave. ut In Toil 642 I 23188631 101 3111 121 101 Wght Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data T r; �2in North 2 0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 mid r — c Cars&Trucks .ya c RIii 4, T r Left Rl.ht Peds IIIIIIFIIIMM Min NW Out In Total TN-3/Chinnancata Ava 1(11) Op 1R�' ALINjvEsc9 a DE i gNaNSf gqagjy.nr TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION-METRO TH-3 at CSAH-66/Vermillion River Trail File Name : TH-3 at CSAH-66 Vermillion Riv Trl 2009 Ref.Pt.: 026.643 Farmington Site Code : 00000000 JAMAR# D4-3365 CH Start Date : 5/20/2009 TURN MOVEMENT COUNT Page No : 3 TH-3/Chippendale Ave. CSAH-66/Vermilion River Trail TH-3/Chippendale Ave. Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I Peds I App.Tont Left I Thru l Right I Peds I App.Total Left I Thru I Right I Peds I App.Tome Inc Total l Peak Hour Analysis From 15:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:45 16:45 14 146 0 0 160 18 0 6 0 24 0 110 35 0 145 329 17:00 10 118 0 0 128 32 0 5 0 37 0 96 24 0 120 285 17:15 17 126 0 0 143 19 0 11 0 30 0 86 30 0 116 289 17:30 18 140 0 0 158 25 0 12 0 37 0 97 27 0 124 319 Total Volume 59 530 0 0 589 94 0 34 0 128 0 389 116 0 505 1222 %App.Total 10 90 0 0 73.4 0 26.6 0 0 77 23 0 PHF .819 .908 .000 .000 .920 .734 000 .708 .000 .865 .000 .884 .829 .000 .871 .929 TH-3/Chippendale Ave. Out Total I 4231 I Inr011 10121 I I 01 5301 691 01 Vht Tryru Lr Peds Peak Hour Data B21 t-m North Peak Hour Begins at 10:45 — 3 c Cars&Trucks 41 r Left Thru RIM Ped EMI NM Min=IP] Out In Total TH-3/f:hlnnandala Ava ,.,Nw.ao4 Vic® i vv v sera DEfflg eg. gSaNS5r9 Wag19 iV TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION-METRO TH-3 at 170th St W/Co.Rd.58 File Name : TH-3 at 170th St CoRd-58 2010 Ref.Pt.: 030.342 Site Code : 00000000 JAMAR#T-2638 CAH Start Date : 10/19/2010 TURN MOVEMENT COUNT Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Cars&Trucks TH-3 170th St W/Co.Rd.58 TH-3 170th St W/Co.Rd.58 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Peds Left I Thru Right I Peds Int Total 06:00 2 15 3 0 2 0 17 99 3 11 1 4 0 157 06:15 6 27 5 0 2 1 17 120 3 7 3 1 0 192 06:30 3 39 7 0 2 6 24 163 2 17 1 5 0 269 06:45 1 35 8 2 0 2 28 130 1 14 1 5 0 227 Total 12 116 23 2 6 9 88 512 9 49 6 15 0 845 07:00 4 50 3 2 2 13 26 160 2 18 2 5 0 287 07:15 4 52 9 1 1 9 25 170 0 17 2 15 0 305 07:30 9 64 9 1 0 3 29 200 5 22 6 8 1 357 07:45 2 66 6 0 1 5 25 140 4 24 1 4 0 278 Total 19 232 27 4 4 30 105 670 11 81 11 32 1 1227 08:00' 1 50 6 1 4 6 20 105 0 16 0 6 0 215 08:15 6 48 8 2 3 2 18 105 0 16 2 7 0 217 08:30 11 36 6 2 0 5 14 94 2 17 1 6 0 194 08:45 2 45 6 1 1 9 17 77 3 8 1 6 0 176 Total 20 179 26 6 8 22 69 381 5 57 4 25 0 802 ""BREAK•"' 15:00 5 72 16 0 4 2 3 0 10 43 3 10 4 21 0 193 15:15 2 108 18 0 7 1 5 0 6 61 1 10 0 10 0 229 15:30 4 78 11 0 2 2 3 0 12 79 0 11 2 19 0 223 15:45 2 104 13 0 2 3 3 0 16 64 0 7 0 11 0 225 Total 13 362 58 0 15 8 14 0 44 247 4 38 6 61 0 870 16:00 4 117 22 1 2 5 1 0 14 65 3 5 2 34 0 275 16:15 5 159 25 0 5 2 4 1 18 81 5 5 2 24 0 336 16:30 2 149 25 0 4 3 2 0 21 71 1 14 1 25 0 318 16:45 2 145 32 0 2 1 1 0 14 85 4 8 2 32 0 328 Total 13 570 104 1 13 11 8 1 67 302 13 32 7 115 0 1257 17:00 2 121 35 0 5 1 3 0 21 72 0 17 2 21 0 300 17:15 0 120 38 0 0 0 3 0 22 82 0 12 0 23 0 300 17:30 6 128 28 0 1 1 3 0 14 77 1 13 0 26 0 298 17:45 4 136 20 0 2 2 2 0 17 67 0 11 4 22 0 287 Total 12 505 121 0 8 4 11 0 74 298 1 53 6 92 0 1185 Grand Total 89 1964 359 1 48 41 94 1 445 2410 43 I 310 40 340 1 I 6186 Apprch% 3.7 81.4 14.9 0 28.1 22.3 51.1 0.5 15.4 83.2 1.5 44.9 5.8 49.2 0.1 Total% 1.4 31.7 5.8 0 0.8 0.7 1.5 0 7.2 39 0.7 5 0.6 5.5 0 ��paeao� ANAEse a DE 6liSaNSitOggagl9N TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION-METRO TH-3 at 170th St W/Co.Rd.58 File Name : TH-3 at 170th St CoRd-58 2010 Ref.Pt.: 030.342 Site Code : 00000000 JAMAR#T-2638 CAH Start Date : 10/19/2010 TURN MOVEMENT COUNT Page No : 2 TH-3 170th St W/Co.Rd.58 TH-3 170th St W/Co.Rd.58 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Left I Thru I Right(Peds I Apy.T. Left I Thru I Rot I Peds I foo.Tow Left I Thor{light I Peds I Mo Tow Left I Thru I Richt I Peds I ao T., Int Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 07:00 4 50 3 0 57 2 2 13 0 17 26 160 2 0 188 18 2 5 0 25 287 07:15 4 52 9 0 65 1 1 9 0 11 25 170 0 0 195 17 2 15 0 34 305 07:30 9 64 9 0 82 1 0 3 0 4 29 200 5 0 234 22 6 8 1 37 357 07:45 2 66 6 0 74 0 1 5 0 6 25 140 4 0 169 24 1 4 0 29 278 Total Volume 19 232 27 0 278 4 4 30 0 38 105 670 11 0 788 81 11 32 1 125 1227 %App.Total 6.8 83.5 9.7 0 10.5 10.5 78.9 0 13.4 85.2 1.4 0 84.8 8.8 25.8 0.8 PHF .528 .879 .750 .000 .848 .500 .500 .577 .000 .559 .905 .838 .550 .000 .840 .844 .458 .533 .250 .845 .859 TH-3 rgal WTI I T1ot05al 91 IMMINOMIN1iLlt] Right r it Peds Peak Hour Data a3 2-16 48- 11R North 5 3– Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 �,5 N r ; Cars&Trucks ��. g 5 g w v 0on — a o_: ���' 11 ® 1 ® Out In Total TH-3 pN[e0y J` y 110) 1141 v.NES(9 ga DEPi g g . cs iag Al TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION-METRO TH-3 at 170th St W/Co.Rd.58 File Name : TH-3 at 170th St CoRd-58 2010 Ref.Pt.: 030.342 Site Code : 00000000 JAMAR#T-2638 CAH Start Date : 10/19/2010 TURN MOVEMENT COUNT Page No : 3 TH-3 170th St W/Co.Rd.58 TH-3 170th St W/Co.Rd.58 Southbound Westbound _ _ Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thru Right Peds App.Tohi Left Thru Right Peds raw Left Thru Right Peds lop T., Left Thru Right Peds Pop TOW in Taw Time Peak Hour Analysis From 15:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:15 16:15 6 159 25 0 189 5 2 4 1 12 18 81 5 0 104 5 2 24 0 31 338 16:30 2 149 25 0 176 4 3 2 0 9 21 71 1 0 93 14 1 25 0 40 318 16:45 2 145 32 0 179 2 1 1 0 4 14 85 4 0 103 8 2 32 0 42 328 17:00 2 121 35 0 158 5 1 3 0 9 21 72 0 0 93 17 2 21 0 40 300 Total Volume 11 574 117 0 702 16 7 10 1 34 74 309 10 0 393 44 7 102 0 153 1282 %App.Tota] 1.6 81.8 16.7 0 47.1 20.8 29.4 2.9 18.8 78.6 2.5 0 28.8 4.6 68.7 0 PHF .550 .903 .838 .000 .929 .800 .583 .625 .250 .708;.881 .909 .500 .000 .945 .647 .875 .797 .000 .911 .954 TH-3 i 3631 116 (1.10651 Right lru Lr Peds Peak Hour Data _ North g o _ J U Peak Hour Begins at 16:15 v — - 3 t • a°'Z cera s Trucks � _ a m J N- 4, T r L ru RI!ht P .s Out In Total TN_3 rn O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r- O I', I\ O r o c0 N O D M CT m ,Ln (o in ^ <t cr O o 0 0 H H LD O N o m N n Cr al a) CO co CO M s- N CO CO CO CO O N Cp M (O O O O co o N (O m o-, Ol Ln Irl ct h o O C) N N N a) r L0 LD 0 r-1 N m cr Cr cr ^ Ca 0 0 0 0 L0 O CO 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 N 0 m 0 al .--1 �o 0 o OlLn1-1 N m m1-1 r- . 1 0 0 0 0 c-Ic00 ,- 0000 ,- 0 CL CL UD CO N N 0 CI 0 0 0 0 0 CO O .-1 0 0 L.0 CV N N O O Ln O oo UJ w .--1 I-- N 0 0 CO CO O ,- CO r V Lo Lf) M 0 0 0 H CO vai o in N TV en 0 i^n .-1 al V V LL0 0 0 0 LU c- c- c- N w cl m cr V Cr Cr V <t m m m Cr V V m m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - N N o 0 C- m 0 0 N .--i N 0 NJ 1-1 r� ,n ,^i m m o o a o LU C w N N La ,r c-1 m - .--1 N N .--1 a E a > 0 m 0 (O O O O O O O O O O N lf) to O O N m o .--1 r, Cr O om m Co N N o 0 Ln o LU Ln LU m rC 0 mO000000 ,- 000000000 u mO .-ILUOooci W N .--Im0co °m° Q�,, 0 In Ln m 0- ro OD m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 ' 0 0 '+-' m O (N N Cr Cr m Ln N in o .--1 '� 0 0 0 0 In ,,f N N cr N of m .-1 h .--1 .-I a a L CO Z o 0 0 0 00000 ,- 0000 ,- 0 p z N' O m h O O Q cl c O O o O o O a , O , E m 0 0 0 0 (Doc ,- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o o a: O o o Lo .-1 0 o N m cn o m 0 Z o Z NI O .-1 E") z 0 0 tCO 0 0 0 o O e- 0 0 0 O O o) Q z o Ti- o o M ^ N N o o in O y a a ra *k a �# N C (n CA N CLO N a) a0 # 0_ rn Com' Q C� NI CV rn�k '� Q U vii 4k E E .-i H N N o Q Q Q !? •"I N QUJ v, > ca a > a) v u a mo E E a E E a a) i,ra " ai 2 c0 Q < > v, u u u N ro c0 > ra > > v, (i < u M 'D a u a Q 2 Q a in t` I` c U) a) M y M a) Q u Q a Q a y, N -1 a c r✓ Q u Q Q c W > f' f „ L >.= w (Di > 0 Q i i +- c co a N' r` O L0 c = (13 ai = c c0 < r '3 o > U 0 a) u) c@.) H r-- cc) �c > co a a o w > cc u a) row H w H ,- > ro o � " N a p U) N a � N a Q co E c c a u N N a aCO V v, a) a N N a " Q r`o , u a a c c „....,:1" c c o o = a in ,n a a " .- - C Ln ,n c `^ E a o "' U) U) a a a) -p m co U) U co m -0 .E a u u > LA N Na) m ca N a) as m a a ill u > Ca a D C) N N > a a N C C l0 a 0 a s to N N Q@ cap_ 73 ,/) ,,-) a a V Q co c V 'a o- a a c c c -p V' rt E N a Ct (9 O a ro a s 7 � c c • CC CC c N r° CC a a a `° O a co ca a Nc Cr CL V N ca c CO ro a ro ra fa RI (.) (J ct N U rn (CO ' ca a s co U a) U > a CU .1-dN C LD V > c as c\i (NI CO� Cco �Cr Cr � fn Q >raa' E a u �liD � Q a ro L 0 CC Q U CC C U u couo rao o u u u u u > o . U U @ U 0 a m a 73 2 CO a u E a c CU tY CL OA Nr iv 0 LIm0 a' - 0 (CO 0 x I- N Z w cC cc m O O O O O O O O O O ,- O N. O O m N O Cn ,--,N cn 0 m N V c o O o O HCNIH N if) O) Q) N M u1 o-) M N N V V Lnm U") N M CO CO O Lc CO O CO O O O m lD m N M a .--i V On O Lf1 N N C O O O -4 N VM m m CO N .--I M N M m m N J J CO LO • 0 0 0 0 0 a0 O O O M O O O o N 0 CO 0 �n N ui O O Cr 0 0 m m 0 0 0 0 cm O T- O O O O LO O N t- O O O N O O m O r1 0 0 N 00 L11 r-I N 0 0 0 0 u1 0 H H O O) V CO LI) N O ri Cr N LU a) 0) m m N cY) c� c0 c0 o In V' co N ,_ O CO O O O m v M 01 .--I N O a) d- N l0 m 0) a) 0 O LU N N N co N w .-1 l0 lD CO CO N N 'Cr .-1 m rn Cr V V m cO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O N CO CO O 0 CO +-, c0 HI 0 00 m a Q) O O) V 0 0 0 W ,- c w u-) .-i ri `-♦ N N N C) E CU > CC 0 CO O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O N CO CD O O M E til m O W m r--. N Ln O N L0 ,N-1 O O -I o roL O H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u HHi 0 ri N 0 0 0 ri ri ri O (NI o Ln i ro m J C J N m 0 c000000000 ,- O 00 o rn 0 _ co O c) N 01 LU N ^ O N N N 0 0 0 0 x CU a t m 0 o 0 0 o 00 0 0 0 M o 0 0 0 N 0 p m 0 0 N 0 0 N ,--1N N lD LU 0 0 0 0 Z Z N en i O . _ E m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O m m O N 0 0 0 o N N O oo o m o z o z M m 0 r1 a J @ JLn Z 0 0 0 0 0 LO O N M ' 0 0 0 N 0 O Q z M O o N O O N M NI N M l0 Cr 0 0 LI) o Y a a) _ (o a`) *k N (i) N CU u) N U N ) 0 m Q O- 0 Q # IL 'N 0 N vii XL E Q a E E au r1 �, a Q a ri a) �, Sk N >> V O a Q N Ct CL co> Q CC f Q > U u U N @ ca > rEo > > v, Li < U in >N i CO cn M >u) cn a� Q au) Q Q Q a ,-LU ,-1 m v en LU L' a ¢ C Q > Q O W > CL CL OU -c C9 H Li] > H (9 O` Q ro r0 co a O ui a CC CC OU _C ? H w _H `O G c C CU 10 N N U U U a N N o U Y E a a N C.) 0 f N y E O a U in In -0 a N C In In N Q r0 - c L U N a a Cr v, C NLCI c `-^ Q f O i a O CU u) (n cco ca a -o m co co O3 CO a E a oU OU 3 a" N co co 1-1 a m ro cn co m -0 .E a v) U c a D D N N > c a N 0 0 Cfl -O d a va) ,n v > N N > a N'cr 0 0 0 'a C a -o -o In p .� V Q CO c V'co a V c a a a c c a a V Q ro ra -° a m a ro co a co c @ V N U U O �' cco > rCo cco j a f 6 R3 U v v v rca cco U rco > rcay a C N N U Uc:L CO n Q c in a E v N _o l..) cc CC CC lD L LU < t° v CU Nr ,j- QUU � � CC o oL � CC c, Q v u C � U CC 0 C a 0a aCL _v �_ o > a Y ru oN H 0 U NC U U a m ri a C Q 'U ri N a Q N m 'i V no d' V Q C cU -00 CC Ti VI 0 ca 0 O F- N Z W Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Akin Rd-- 195th St W QC JOB#: 10627108 CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: 6/8/2011 310 0.79 230 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM--6:00 PM ♦ t L 0.3 1.3 4,1 49 204 57 Peak 15-Min: 5:45 PM--6:00 PM I 4 t 0.0 0.5 0 0I� 273 4.34 J t. 54 4.316 J a 4 2.2 *0.0 . t. 0.0♦ 2.8 0.85 171 * 0.83 4. 157 0.78 1.8 • 4. 3.8 356* 151 1 l 105.►285 .t t e a, 0.8 4.0.0 7 c 2.9♦ 1.1 h t r' 67 142 57 Quality Counts i t 0.0 2.1 0 0 460 0.96 266 a t 0.9 1.1 _I 12 L 1 . 0 0 1 0 J t. 0 0I'. A111 0 , . 0 p 1 p : J1 LL_ . -.-] �, tr•` o 0 0 0 r 7 L . J__ _ 4 406161. 1:t0 1Ir �p i L . J _ I. ains. - C h 4 r' F. ___1 41 4 el--- 15-Min Count Akin Rd Akin Rd 195th St W 195th St W Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4:00 PM 21 32 13 0 14 26 14 0 13 30 19 0 19 26 7 0 234 4:15 PM 15 31 18 0 13 28 4 0 4 41 22 0 14 34 5 0 229 4:30 PM 11 37 19 0 18 43 15 0 5 53 15 0 14 27 11 0 268 4:45 PM 14 42 13 0 20 30 9 0 9 52 27 0 13 28 8 0 265 996 5:00 PM 14 40 16 0 12 38 10 0 5 45 21 0 18 32 12 0 263 1025 5:15 PM 13 24 20 0 19 52 8 0 5 53 34 0 17 31 12 0 288 1084 5:30 PM 15 39 11 0 12 48 13 0 14 33 41 0 31 49 13 0 319 1135 J 5:45 PM 25 39 10 0 14 86 18 0 10 40 55 0 39 45 17_ 0 I`378 " '1245 1 1 I 1 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Richt U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 100 156 40 0 56 264 72 0 . 40 160 220 0 156 180 68 0 1512 Heavy Trucks 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 0 20 Pedestrians 0 16 0 12 28 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/13/2011 10:37 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Akin Rd--195th St W QC JOB#: 10627107 CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: 6/8/2011 196 0.91 191 Peak-Hour: 7:00 AM--8:00 AM I a 4, 3.6 4.2 a6 1z3 zs i 4 Peak 15-Min: 7:15 AM--7:30 AM I • * 6.3 3.3 0 0 l_ 285 *13 J t 40+268 6.3 *7.7 J t 2.5* 5.2 0.80 109 0 0.82 4. 151 0.90 6.4 * M 6.6 199•77 'i i' 77*204 h * r a, 7.0 *7.8 Z t 3.9* 5.9 h t r' /- 86 138 '.t ♦ Quality Counts 5.8 4.3 7.1 277 0.67 294 + 4.7 5.4 0 0 . ___1 I � ., •a tI_ 0 t t o 0 t A II 0 • ( * 0 eilLi i l•� � 1l• stop 0 1 4 0 1 4 0 1 0 I 4— l_J J i 1. . J i 4 ,,,,,,,,>,. —c-1 1 r r ,eF . ..... • --1 ,1 .1 e r_ 7 4, . r• p 15-Min Count Akin Rd Akin Rd 195th St W 195th St W Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 7:00 AM 16 25 24 0 6 42 6 0 4 29 25 0 29 23 14 0 243 1 7:15 AM 35 59 16 0 6 35 9 0 4 32 26 0 29 35 6 0 .''292 I 7:30 AM 21 35 19 0 7 25 15 0 2 22 18 0 13 43 12 0 232 7:45 AM 14 19 11 0 6 21 18 0 3 26 8 0 6 50 8 0 190 957 8:00 AM 11 27 13 0 4 21 24 0 4 29 19 0 18 46 14 0 230 944 8:15 AM 19 33 13 0 3 13 4 0 3 19 8 0 8 17 3 0 143 795 8:30 AM 8 25 7 0 4 13 11 0 4 16 11 0 5 27 7 0 138 701 8:45 AM 12 20 2 0 2 13 25 0 3 24 13 0 6 37 6 0 163 674 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 140 236 64 0 24 140 36 0 16 128 104 0 116 140 24 0 1168 Heavy Trucks 8 8 0 0 4 4 0 8 0 4 12 0 I 48 Pedestrians 4 0 0 0 4 Bicycles 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/13/2011 10:36 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: TH 3(Chippendale Ave)--Elm St(County Rd 50) QC JOB#: 10627106 CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: 6/8/2011 607 0.89 595 Peak-Hour:4:30 PM--5:30 PM I a * 43 0.0 222 375 10 Peak 15-Min:4:45 PM--5:00 PM a t 7.2 z.7 0.0 J a t. 412 •284 j t. 16+ 52 a 4 66 +35J *_ 0.0+ 0.0 0.91 55 4 0.98 F 36 0.74 1.8 4 411111 f 0.0 519 4 180 1 ( 0 4 65 1 t f 4.0 4, 5.6 1 - 4- 0.04 1.5 '1 t r` i---- 154 295 0 Quality Counts a t 7.1 5.1 0.0 555 0.88 449 a t 3.6 5.8 LI .►0 a1 '.0 I 0 ., t 1 1 v st F 0 IJ11L. it 0 1 r 0 r r30 0 0 J J a 1. L _1 J a 4 L I 1 I i r .t . 1 r 1 r --I •t * e p 741 . e p 15-Min Count TH 3(Chippendale Ave) TH 3(Chippendale Ave) Elm St(County Rd 50) Elm St(County Rd 50) Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4:00 PM 36 63 0 0 3 69 51 0 69 6 39 0 0 11 3 0 350 4:15 PM 30 50 1 0 5 84 46 0 55 13 41 0 0 14 7 0 346 4:30 PM 41 86 0 0 1 75 46 0 83 15 45 0 0 12 2 0 406 I 4:45 PMAIMMI=Ig 0 0 1 99 51M 0 80 15 49 `E'0 5 3 0 MINEF 1516 5:00 PM 45 51 0 0 3 113 58 0 69 15 46 0 0 8 5 0 413 1579 5:15 PM 32 84 0 0 5 88 66 0 52 10 40 0 0 11 6 0 394 1627 5:30 PM 38 66 0 0 1 62 54 1 55 10 33 0 0 5 4 0 329 1550 5:45 PM 37 57 1 0 2 90 75 0 69 10 38 0 0 14 6 0 399 1535 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left_ Thru Ri•ht U All Vehicles > 144 296 0 0 4 396 208 0 320 60 196 0 0 20 12 0 1656 Heavy Trucks 4 20 0 0 12 24 12 0 16 0 0 0 88 Pedestrians 0 4 0 0 4 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/13/2011 10:36 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: TH 3(Chippendale Ave)--Elm St(County Rd 50) QC JOB#: 10627105 CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: 6/8/2011 428 0.88 539 Peak-Hour: 7:00 AM--8:00 AM a * 3.71 8.5 245 180 3 1 Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM--8:00 AM a 3.7 8.3 667 J 4 4 436 *177 J t 35• 98 4, a 4t 6.4 ♦10.2J t 5.7* 7.1 cr, 0.88 9 4 0.95 4. 61 0.94 0.0 * AP 4. 8.2 273*87 -3 r 2* 12 .I t r 132*20.77 ( 0.0*16.7 .1, t r r. '3° ' ° Quality Counts a t ,0.8 8.0 00 269 0.93 457 a t 12.3 8.8 ___j 0 L 1 , . 0 1 1 .t t 0 1 I t 0 0 4 efrlb • 1 ...1_ �► II II t 0 0F-- 0 0 0 _... r •a 4t.� _v. J J •a 4 ©, , �� r --14) * e p 74) a e r_ 15-Min Count TH 3(Chippendale Ave) TH 3(Chippendale Ave) Elm St(County Rd 50) Elm St(County Rd 50) Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 7:00 AM 32 69 0 0 3 29 74 0 38 4 17 0 1 17 6 0 290 7:15 AM 25 90 0 0 0 44 54 0 54 3 23 0 0 17 8 0 318 7:30 AM 27 91 0 0 0 50 48 0 45 1 28 0 1 13 12 0 316 0 0 0 67 69 0 40 1 19 0'. 56 8:00 AM 30 57 0 0 0 39 78 0 43 4 19 0 0 11 8 0 289 1255 8:15 AM 22 41 0 0 2 44 57 0 41 3 19 0 0 13 4 0 246 1183 8:30 AM 35 47 0 0 1 35 48 0 38 4 13 0 0 9 6 0 236 1103 8:45 AM 29 42 2 0 0 43 55 0 41 9 19 0 2 15 2 0 259 1030 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 184 308 0 0 0 228 276 0 ' 160 4 76 0 0 56 36 0 1328 Heavy Trucks 4 28 0 0 20 24 4 0 16 0 4 4 104 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/13/2011 10:36 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: TH 3(Chippendale Ave)-- 195th St W QC JOB#: 10627104 CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: 6/8/2011 714 0.85 419 Peak-Hour:4:30 PM--5:30 PM l a ! L 2.2 5.3 13a 571 5 Peak 15-Min:5:00 PM--5:15 PM a ! oo2.aoo .► a 4 228 aii 51 J t 8* 9 044.9.84 L 0.0. 0.0 0.94 1 • 0.95 * 0 0.55 0.0 ♦ 44111 • 0.0 199*1477 t 1* 7 1 ! Vow 4.0 2.0 7 - c 0.0♦ 0.0 h ! r so 360 1 Quality Counts a ! ,., 4.7 0.0 719 0.97 451 ! 2.6 4.0 1 0 L . . 0 JJ ✓ a sk,4 L 0 ., ,. 0 0t A to 0 t h •! f 7 0 r � 0 0 0r J J a 4 L -b 1 J a I. r iliwi 4. 7 r 7 r 15-Min Count TH 3(Chippendale Ave) TH 3(Chippendale Ave) 195th St W 195th St W Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly Total Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4:00 PM ' 23 92 2 0 0 103 23 1 6 0 30 0 1 1 0 0 282 4:15 PM 18 86 0 0 0 129 23 1 13 0 32 0 0 0 2 0 304 4:30 PM 20 91 0 0 0 136 24 0 10 0 42 0 0 0 1 0 324 4:45 PM_ 19 95 0 0 3 141 32 0 15 0 36 0 0 0 3 0 344 1254 i 5:00 PM 23 87 0 0 .," ., _ 0 i:; 38 .0 11 1 31 0 ._0- 0 0 0 , 5:15 PM 28 87 1 0 2 122 44 0 15 0 38 0 1 0 4 0 342 1373 5:30 PM 28 76 0 0 1 131 26 0 9 2 34 0 0 2 1 0 310 1359 5:45 PM 38 77 1 0 1 132 27 0 6 3 44 0 0 0 0 0 329 1344 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U II Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U _ Alli Vehicles 92 348 0 0 0 688 152 0 44 4 124 0 0 0 0 0 1452 Heavy Trucks 0 20 0 0 12 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 44 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/13/2011 10:36 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: TH 3(Chippendale Ave)--195th St W QC JOB#: 10627103 CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: 6/8/2011 238 0.91 813 Peak-Hour: 7:00 AM--8:00 AM a t 8.0 4.4 39 1ss 3 Peak 15-Min: 7:15 AM--7:30 AM I a t L 7.7 7.7 33.3 J i �. 128 *149,) t 2+ 2 i 4 6.3 +2.0 > 150.0+50.0 0.91 0 • 0.94 • 0 0.38 0.0 * AP • 0.0 211 .4.62 1 l 0* 4 - h f 4. a: 2.4 * 3.21 f 0.0*25.0 7 h t r 91662 1 Quality Counts a t 5.5 4.8 0 0 260 0.94 754 a t 6.5 4.9 1 0 L 0 o o 1 J I ✓ •a t. o .t t 0 IA t 0 .► cam « 0 Y 0 1 r 0 �► L t r• o p � o 0 0 JJ i A —1. --I J a 1. 1 t r 3 — t • 4. 1 1.411I1Prr r r h t P 1---- .-14 t r• r— 15-Min Count TH 3(Chippendale Ave) TH 3(Chippendale Ave) 195th St W 195th St W Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 7:00 AM 18 169 0 0 0 30 12 0 37 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 286 I 7:15 AM 19 178 0 0 2 52 11 0 44 1 0 321 jIIIIIIIII 7:30 AM 22 177 0 2 1 54 6 0 38 0 15 0 0 0 1 0 316 7:45 AM 30 138 1 0 0 60 10 0 30 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 282 1205 8:00 AM 22 98 0 0 3 48 8 0 30 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 234 1153 8:15 AM 8 85 1 0 0 53 12 0 14 1 16 0 0 1 0 0 191 1023 8:30 AM 11 103 0 0 1 39 8 0 16 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 186 893 8:45 AM 11 73 0 0 3 52 5 1 11 1 17 0 1 1 0 0 176 787 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 76 712 0 0 8 208 44 0 176 0 56 0 0 0 4 0 I 1284 Heavy Trucks 0 36 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 48 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/13/2011 10:35 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) MnDOT Office of Transportation Data &Analysis 2008 -09 Traffic Volumes 1 1:-.=:"f-.- 'cr.;. - -,':n.m sT .. ...,o• "l•nPiou .K t55fn E sr... _ ISSrx ST. P. �, "r yy III.IDDLG I11M CT. <I.utPlaCT.9'i� CM%4L I..effin KxS..,y. 8 S..CH VOLE CT. .5.C5b"LESTO%AVE. INC .] CT. SG 115m ST... 1F. 9.OL[GbC"..T 1AS r�® Y. ��µ[tL I., �� IAL C..POLAK,AVE. '.CMTS kx 15.m Sr. ` CA: 166 CRESTVIU(D1. r r", r1C "`•�� VI.QUARK%CT. I5:1PTT.nim ire.. lo�M AL e� ITS.ML0C.r10.0..1 5411 x..V.ISM ST...c S '' VC 91.006019.0 C0. _ ITC.C9EST%LT..V t i5f•1"'rEM (—.Y—.K QC 1(1� K . cra.MUM", ". C .. — 111�\U. '4S'Wil1-1U— O .t € • 1111111I i1111111P E 9400 a F5 I TI I.."'„ II EMPIRE TOWNSHIP n / ,, 2000 POP.1.638 I I 1.51.7-4,11111*/ i,{] , - 1 Ira, ST. S. �_— / )� , film N,. p 'a 13 V.I;; ITbs...Ar .. t 2000 POP 1 II T. .S Nr CT. ' 3 0.M • d ,. . Q �Re, ■}oc 414 t Y 06714 i i M cru..,. I EI (;....•' I1cro r 8 * .% •,MMIC sr _.F i cr. +\. 0111 C• .• liffirt.147''''',4 py f• hla UST.• tbwZ, ..6 R I • = G3 �1. ttk �4p I to. IT. - C 11. w V.6 • `?,...„4.r R[—R[I 0. ``J i `. Yim '.�% ST... , P% - \: * i _ ra' • acro — " ar'^1. � • a. b T. rW%0 I iMTTE.,IrIs, IN 108.i,.4) / aT or.sT,NW- Projected Volume Calculations Seed/Genstar AUAR update-AM Peak TH 3(S Robert Tr1)&16014 Street W(CSAI-I 46) AM EBL Etil EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR A Existing 2011 240 365 50 40 257 48 165 388 124 41 119 68 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b*years)*a Background 96 146 20 16 103 19 66 155 50 16 48 27 D Other trips 0 12 1 3 12 1 1 35 3 1 12 0 E(a+c+d) No-build 2031 336 523 71 59 372 68 232 578 177 58 179 95 F site trips IN 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 G site trips OUT 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 H project dist%in 0% 0% 11% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 21% 0% I project dist%out 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 21% 5% 0% 0% 0% J(f*h) Project trips IN 0 0 74 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 0 K(g*i) Project trips OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 267 64 0 0 0 L Pass-by trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 336 523 145 93 372 68 372 845 240 58 320 95 TII3(Chippendale Ave)&170th Street W(CSAI-I 58) AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR A Existing 2011 81 11 32 4 4 30 105 670 11 19 232 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% isazrojezBack;.ound 32 4 13 2 2 12 42 268 4 8 93 11 D Othertri.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 12 0 E a+c+d No-build 2031 113 15 45 6 6 42 147 973 15 27 337 38 F site tri. IN 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 G site tri. OUT 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 H • .'ect dist%in 0% 0% 7% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 37% 0% I .r.'ectdist%out 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 37% 1% 0% 0% 0% ®Pr.'ect tri.s IN 0 0 47 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 249 0 Effiral Pr.'ect tri.:OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 470 13 0 0 0 L Pass. tris 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 113 15 92 12 6 42 236 1443 28 27 585 38 TII 3(Chippendale Avc&190111 St reel 4V AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR A Existing 2011 149 0 62 0 0 2 91 662 1 3 196 39 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b*years)*a Background 60 0 25 0 0 1 36 265 0 1 78 16 D Other trips 0 7 2 17 20 30 3 5 6 10 2 0 E(a+c+d) No-build 2031 209 7 89 17 20 33 130 932 7 14 276 55 F site trips IN 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 G site trips OUT 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 H project dist%in 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 11% 0% 0% 0% 25% I project dist%out 25% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 14% J(f*h) Project trips IN 91 0 0 0 0 0 92 76 0 0 0 166 K(g*i) Project trips OUT 315 0 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 172 L Pass-by trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 614 7 264 17 20 33 223 1007 7 14 419 393 TI-13(Chippendale Ave)&CSAII 66(Vermillion River Tr) AM ' WBL . 5 WBR NBR SBL SBT A Existin; 2011 120 J72 r' 470 75 12 311 B Growth factor - 2% 2% II; ' 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b* ears*a Back ound ` ' 48 29 " ; 188 30 5 124 D Other tri.s 4 11 6 1 4 17 E a+c+d) No-build 2031 172112 664 106 21 452 F site tri•s IN ' 1 ,s. 672 ;' 672 672 672 672 672 G site tri•s OUT 1271 ' 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 H •r.'ect dist%in 0% 2% i' 4: 23% 0% 0% 0% I •r.'ect dist%out 0% 0% v' 0% 0% 2% 23% rit6011 Pr.'ect tri's IN 0 13 s' • 155 0 0 0 1211` Pr.'ect tri.s OUT 0 0 0 0 25 292 L Pass-b tri si 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 172 125 819 106 46 745 TII 3(Chippendale Ave)&Elm Slice( (CSAI-I 50) - -AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR A Existin; 2011 177 9 87 2 61 35 130 327 0 3 180 245 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% LSCZEDIEM Badc?ound 71 4 35 1 24 14 52 131 0 1 72 98 D Other tri.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 21 0 E a+c+d No-build 2031 248 13 122 3 85 49 182 465 0 4 273 343 F site tri.s IN 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 G site tri. OUT 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 H .r.'ect dist%in 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% I •r•'ect dist%out 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 10% rjaMMIPre'ecttri.sIN 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 0 Pr•'ecttri. OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 127 L Pass-b tri.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 315 13 122 3 85 49 182 552 0 4 438 470 ,.", _, Akin Road&195th Street W(CSAII 64) AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR A Existin;2011 13 109 77 77 151 40 86 138 70 25 123 48 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b* ears)*a Back ound 5 44 31 31 60 16 34 55 28 10 49 19 D Other tri.s 0 9 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E a+c+d No-build 2031 18 162 108 108 234 56 120 193 98 35 172 67 F site tri•s IN 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 672 G site trips OUT 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 1271 H .r.'ect dist%in 0% 15% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 10% 0% 0% I .r.'ect dist%out 0% 0% 0% 5% 15% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% MENEM Pr.'ect tri.s IN 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 67 0 0 ga111111 Pr.'ect tri•s OUT 0 0 0 64 191 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 L Pass-b tri.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 18 262 108 171 425 183 120 193 132 102 172 67 arnmillierrell.'-7 TI-1 3(Chippendale Ave)&Access A AM EBL +• EBR ,x' ° ' to NBL NM' ... SBT SBR A Pvt.:tin:2011 0 0 0 786 268 0 B Growth factor 2% `"• 2% „' w' 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b` ears*a Back.ound 0 0 ) 0 314 107 0 D Other tri.s 0 0 1^ 0 35 12 0 E a+c+d) No-build 2031 0 0 '"!1 0 1135 387 0 F site tri.s IN 672 , 672 k;1 f 672 672 672 672 G site tri.s OUT 1271 i;'. 1271 . '"1 '"-::"1,' "� 1271 1271 1271 1271 H .r.'ect dist%in 0% 0% . 4 x 1 14% 0% `. 34% 11% I •r.'ect dist%out 11% .,} 14% .. .:I. 0% 34% 0% 0% Mini...Pr.'ect tri.s IN 0 "' 0 . .„, .- 92 0 227 76 17a Pr.'ecttri '�sOUT 143 G; 175 ‘,.!,.,1*. Ir' 0 429 0 0 L Pass-b tris 0 0 �-" „ y '...:t;') 1 � 0 0 ���'. 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 143 175 "' 92 1564 614 76 AmPiliroll TII 3(Chippendale Ave)&Access 13 AM EBL 1;.. EBR x F:' t } is NBL NBT rt - ' SBT SBR A Existin:2011 0 0 � �,r, 'k 0 786 268 0 • B Growth factor 2% ,; 2% -'``l�,x s 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b" ears)*a Back:.ound 0 0 u: i ; 0 314 ;..'..i'' 107 0 D Other tris 0 ; 0 r,,,,,i, ift 0 35 s 12 0 E a+c+d) No build 2031 0 r 0 .F ,. l,t 0 1135 I<A 387 0 F site tri s IN 672 :t:,:.' 672t'.•::/"`„.4-5)-44+;',4,1,,' ``'I. ', 672 672 • 1 -'' 672 672 .„... G site tri.s OUT 1271 �1%„ 1271 ; t t°?,1.s,..S 1271 1271 .,..".:1. { r 1271 1271 •H •r•'ect dist%in 0% ° 0°I° ti `�tTi ,< 1 6% 14% ? 29% 5% I •r.'ect dist%out 5% ! 6% ',f j It:,,,,-1 ;1 0% 29% )r, .f= 14% 0% ®Pr.'ect tri.s IN 0 .;. 0 . s. % �.( :' " 37 92 += 197 30 Pr.'ect tris OUT 57 70 'I! ' 0 372 .# 175 0 At- L Pass-b tri. -..;,..(.41.17,14....f,'fi ; 0 i, 0r 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 57 s 70 ' 4� 37 1600 3 . 759 30 ' TII 3(Chippendale Ave)&Access C ----_ _, - r. AM EBL ^, EBR ' *11?,rI••a, ; ,. NBL NBT ( {- SBT SBR A Existin: 20110 0 rw 0 813 238 0 B Growth factor 2% 2% a ..."4.1 1;' 2 2% 2% 2% 2% Back;ound 0 =`. 0 J F;" ,#f,, 0 325 „, 95 0 • D Other tri.s 0 '4i: 0 zr= 4' i `, -' 0 35 `.:-U 12 0 E a+c+d) No-build 2031 0 ,y 0 .".y IA r; • 0 1173 'i, 345 0 F site tries IN 672 672 3,"`.-;k-,, . ",.b 672 672 a 672 672 G site trips OUT 1271 ', 1271 1 4kr"t r i' 1,; 1271 1271 0*„": t = 1271 1271 H .r.'ect dist%in 0% r 4 0% "' x s 6% 19% of' r.; 25% 5% I •r•'ect dist%out 5% 0, 6% r 'M) # i i, i+l 0% 25% ,. 19% 0% Ne'Pr.'ect tri.s IN0 i, 0 'r 37 129 :, y 166 30 �" Pr.'ect tris OUT 57 ".'''" 70 t ria 4w,4..k.--p.,.'�t11 T, 0 315 i• V 245 0 L Pass-b tris 9 ;`.a` 20 .1;1. ,,,..-T,;„' *lD„,1 ;;;, 9 -9 ''* ' ,. "` -20 20 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 66 """' 90 .;'t' • 1 .,., 46 1608 by.1'. 736 50 �r.� .' 190th Street"W C Access 1) . t � � 11111 AM EBL EBT • WBT WBR .', SBL SBR A F.xietin• 2011 0 211 130 0 0 0 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b" ears)*a Back?ound 0 84 52 0 0 0 D Other tri.s 0 9 23 0 0 0 E a+c+d No-build 2031 0 304 205 0 0 0 F site tri.s IN 672 672 672 672 •} 672 672 G site tri.s OUT 1271 1271 1271 1271 ! 1271 1271 H .r.'ect dist%in 15% 14% +.l 4% 35% V. 0°l0 0% I .r.'ect dist%out 0% 4% 4, 14% 0% 35% r.." 15% ®Pr.'ect tri.s IN 101 91 �' 24 235 0 0 Iaill .'ect tris OUT 0 44 '. 172 0 . 445 i 191 L Pass-b tri.s 9 -9 -20 20 9 20 M(e+j+k+1) Build,2031 110 431 380 255 , ` 454 211 195th Street W&Access T iiiiIiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiiiiIiiiiiiiiiiiii AM EBL EBT M'"./ q,,:.{ WBT WBR '? �,. .. - SBL *:, SBR A Existin• 2011 0 204 ,•r 268 0 ',w" 0 0 B Growth factor 2% 2% ? : ' 2% 2% * r a 2% 2% Back:.ound 0 82 * ;' f 107 0 "« n * ;'Y', 0 , , 0 D Other tri.s 0 9 * 23 0 .' ,1 ri ! y,i I 0 " 0 E a+c+d No-build 2031 0 295 , f . 398 0 t' 0 '* 0 F site tri.s IN 672 672 3, „,'' 3' 672 672 ' s r . , c' '�s 672 672 G site tri.s OUT 1271 1271 tt` i '' 1271 1271 `', t r#� 1271 x 1271 H .r.'ect dist%in 2% 29% i• ''« 0% 4% •'t w° i1. 0% 0% I •r.'ect dist%out 0% 0% 29% 0% ',� 3. r a ` :• 4% 2% M.. T ®Pr.'ect tri. IN 10 192 . , 0 24 *i 0 0 Pr.'ect tris OUT 0 0 ^u 362 0 .s t: �' 44 k: 19 L Pass-b tri.s 0 0 "'d*t. 0 0 4 « '- it ";.'�'' 0 ' , 0 . M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 10 486 f ; 760 24 . r.;- _* r. 44 19 Seed/Genstar AUAR update-PM Peak TII 3(S Robert Trl)&1600i Street W(CSAll 116) PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR A Existing 2011 117 391 123 92 355 72 77 234 50 70 434 193 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b*years)*a Background 47 156 49 37 142 29 31 94 20 28 174 77 D Other trips 0 4 0 2 10 1 1 24 1 1 43 0 E(a+c+d) No-build 2031 164 551 172 131 507 102 109 352 71 99 651 270 F site trips IN 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 G site trips OUT 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 H project dist%in 0% 0% 11%' 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 21% 0% I project dist%out 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 21% 5% 0%' 0% 0% J(f*h) Project trips IN o 0 150 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 286 0 K(g*i) Project trips OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 205 49 0 0 0 L Pass-by trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 164 551 322 199 507 102 216 556 120 99 937 270 11-1 3(Chippendale Ave)&170th Street W(CSA I-158) ' PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR A Existin:2011 44 7 102 16 7 10 74 309 10 11 574 117 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% MEM'Back: ound 18 3 41 6 3 4 30 124 4 4 230 47 D Other tri.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 43 0 E a+c+d) No-build 2031 62 10 143 22 10 14 104 457 14 15 847 164 F site tri.sIN 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 G site tri.s OUT 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 H • .'ect dist%in 0% 0% 7% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 37% 0% I .r.'ect dist%out 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 37% 1% 0% 0% 0% ®Pr.'ect tri. IN 0 0 95 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 504 0 Pr.'ect tri.s OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 361 10 0 0 0 L Pass-. tri es 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 62 10 238 36 10 14 172 817 24 15 1351 164 T1-I 3(Chippendale Ave$&190th Street 4V 1 PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR A Existing 2011 51 1 147 1 0 8 90 360 1 5 571 138 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b*years)*a Background 20 0 59 0 0 3 36 144 0 2 228 55 D Other trips 0 23 5 11 13 20 2 4 19 35 8 0 E(a+c+d) No-build 2031 71 24 211 12 13 31 128 508 20 42' 807 193 F site trips IN 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 G site trips OUT 975 975 975 975` 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 H project dist%in 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 11% 0% 0% 0% 2.5% I project dist%out 25% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 14% J(f*h) Project trips IN 184 0 0 0 0 0 187 153. 0 0 0 337 K(g*i) Project trips OUT 241 0 134 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 110 132 L Pass-by trips 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 497 24 345 12 13 31 315 661 20 42 917 662 TI.-I3(Chippendale Ave)&CSAI-I 66(Vermillion River Tr) PM WBL WBR ..' NBT NBR SBL SBT A F.xistin• 2011 94 34 389 116 59 530 B Growth factor ": ti` 2% 2% ? 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b* ears*a Back amid I 38 ' 14 4 156 46 24 212 D Other tris 3 a 8 19 4 13 11 E a+c+d No-build 2031 135 t'i 56 564 166 96 753 F site tri.s IN i ,i 1362 . <ti'a: 1362 1362 1362 1362 13621 G site tri. OUT i'' 975 ': 975975 975 975 9751 H .r.'ect dist%in C 0% t,,Y 2% ' 'x 23% 0% 0% 0% I .r.'ect dist%out 1. 0% A 3 0% " 0% 0% 2% 23% [L(Pr.'ect tri.s IN0 27 f 313 0 0 0 E.N Pr.'ect tri.s OUT .. . 0 '; 0 0 0 20 224 L Pass-b tris ; 0 ' , 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 E 135 ' ; 83 ' 877 166 115 977 TI-I 3(Chippendale Ave)&Elm Street(CSAI-I 50) . I PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT BR A Exis: . 2011 284 55 180 0 36 16 154 295 0 10 375 222 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% C(b* ears*a Back?ound 114 22 72 0 14 6 62 118 0 4 150 89 D Other tri.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 14 0 E a+c+d) No-build 2031 398 77 252 0 50 22 216 436 0 14 539 311 F site tri•s IN 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 G site tri. OUT 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 H • .'ect dist%in 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% I .r.'ect dist%out 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 10% ®Pr.'ect tri.s IN 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 0 0 0 0 DIMMIllPr.'ecttri.s OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 98 L Pass-b tri.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 534 77 252 0 50 22 216 613 0 14 666 408 Akin Road&195th Street W(CSAI-I 64) ..._. _ - PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR A Existin;2011 34 171 151 105 157 54 67 142 57 57 204 49 B Growth factor 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% tI Back?ound 14 68 60 42 63 22 27 57 23 23 82 20 D Other tri.s 0 28 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E a+c+d) No-build 2031 48 267 211 147 235 76 94 199 80 80 286 69 F sitetri.-IN 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 1362 G site tri.s OUT 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 975 H •r.'ect dist%in 0% 15% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 10% 0% 0% I .r.'ect dist%out 0% 0% 0% 5% 15% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% ®Pr.'ect tri.s IN 0 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 136 0 0 Q 'Pr.'ect tris OUT 0 0 0 49 146 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 L Pass-b tris 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 48 472 211 196 381 173 94 199 148 216 286 69 TII 3(Chippendale Ave)&Access A PM EBL , EBR NBL NBT _;: •r a,» SBT SBR A Existin• 2011 0 0 A . .f I 0 393 692,� 2/O B Growth factor 2% - 2% ' r '� ' $i` 2% 2% 2% ° a. �Back ound 0 0 '' «`1 0 157 277 0 D Other tri.s 0 0 ;4 k •t'. 0 25 37 0 E a+c+d No-build 2031 0 0 •,'$1 " 0 575 ' ' 1006 0 F site tri.s IN 1362 1362 : 1 , 1362 1362 z 1362 1362 G site tri.s OUT 975 975 h 1 "•'; 975 975 e!' 975 975 H .I.'ect dist%in 0% • 0% " t I ;; 14% 0% Eti 34% 11% I •r.'ect dist%out 11% 14% , ' 0% 34% 0% 0% J(f*h) Pr.'ect tri.s IN 0 0 k, 1 187 0 460 153 EIREINEI Pr.'ect tris OUT 110 , 134 ,. F rt•1' 1 0 329 , , 0 0 L Pass-b tris 0 0 ify ;Y 0 0 • t 0 0 MUMLEM Build 2031 110 134 187 904 1465 153 TII 3(Chippendale Ave)&Access B PM EBL }. EBR .., t NBL NBT .1.1c-'0,1_4',-,$.i SBT SBR A Existin;2011 0 • •t." ' 0 393 ,rh , 692 0 B Growth factor 2% 2% `•, u ; ;'. 2% 2% ,"„44.,..•,.. £, 2% 2% a azzal Back?ound 0 '(y 0 }' �,4* 0 157 ak+'''t 277 0 D Other tris 0 5r` 0 'rt (.' ', 0 25 ' 37 0 E a+c+d) No-build 2031 0 04.,$.4,4:, ?; ,1' t 0 575 -111'- r 1006 0 F site tri.s IN 1362 ,: 1362 , :1..` 5;, y 1362 1362 '1'$ ,Y`` .{ 1362 1362 G site tri.s OUT 975 T' 975 "`,4ti's ' ' 975 975 ,.,r4:7-",:$,-,?`. 975 975 H •r.'ect dist%in 0% 0% dt r$ i 0%6% 14% -,•':...i"-.;$Ia 29% 5% I .r•'ectdist%out 5% . 6% •' ° t; 14% 0% ®Pr•'ecthi.sIN 0 .JH 0 .'3^A.1,",$,:./..,, 75 187 �,.p,;'J ., 398 61 r.s �_ ., r.. Pr•'ect tri•s OUT 44 54 s; ��,¢ 0 285 " 134 0 L Pass-. tis 0 "s 0 ` tzly 0 0 t •'fit 0 0 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 44 54 - 75 1048 ' 1538 61 I-I 3(Chippendale Ave)&Access C PM EBL EBR NBL NBT x SBT SBR A Existin: 2011 0 xi, 0 4 k"':4;tr ' 0 419 ,:> 714 0 B Growth factor 2% .rj 2% ' i I ti.'' 2 2% 2% }t%'' ' 2% 2% C(b* ears)*a Back.ound 0 '"�'' 0 $ , ., r 0 168 ' _t4+ 'j 286 0 • :'fir zr'0 ' ' 3 D Other tri.s 0 far 0 ..,.,,A44:" *; 0 25t.+ 37 0 E a+c+d) No-build 2031 0 -t 0 ,,y 1 0 612 ' 1037 0 M f" 0a r ';• 1 1362 1362 'I' " 1 1362 1362 F site trI•s IN 1362 r 1362 i , u G site tri.sOUT 975 xk 975 - :ltd.,.� 975 975 th= f 975 975 H •r.'ect dist%in 0% 4' 0% a i.,. ' ' 6% 19% ';,'Q.1.) ( 25% 5% I •r.'ect dist%out 5% • Yom: 6%° i,. .1,-, � , 0% 25% %'' .A 'r 19% 0% ®Pr.'ect tri s IN 0 �'' 0 '' i `` , ' !,= 75 262 $`'*`J' '1'` 337 61 MM..Pr.'ecttri.sOUT 44 1'« 54 t •. F *t ,; 0 241 t 188 0 L Pass-b trios 32 $- 70 ';x(1444$;' i �;r ; 32 32 :*l „ "+ -74 74 M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 76 ' 124 " r lR.. 107 1083 ' t' y. 1487 135 190th Street W&Access D PM EBL EBT {,,, WBT WBR ' � 3 " SBL • SBR A Existin;2011 0 199 ' 228 0 R r 0 ' 0 B Growth factor 2% 2% '` 2% 2% :1` 2% 2% at `�g1 Back:;ound 0 80 C' 91 0 s,, 0 0 D Other tri•s 0 28 i, 15 0 ' • -t 0 0 E a+c+d) No-build 2031 0 307 µ.' 334 0 'r r,'-. 0 u 0 F site tri.s IN 1362 1362 ! 1362 1362 fir 1362 • 1362 G site tri.s OUT 975 975 975 975 '"+ :{ 975 r w 975 H •r.'ect dist%in 15% 14% 1 • '� 4% 35% T�k '` 0% r 0% I .r.'ect dist%out 0% 4% i 14% 0% _tr` ''�'! 35% 15% �'Pr.'ect tris IN 204 184 1•., 48 477 ` f � ' 0 'i_ 0 ��'Pr.'ecttri.sOUT 0 34 1.1" 132 0 `4 n '* °f 341 E ! 146 L Pass-b tris 32 -32 s a a -74 74 r f**r " l -,( 30 l' 70 j Build 2031 236 493 439 551 `' s. 371 216 -, .- 14,,TIMIRIPTV1lTle 195th Street W&Access> PM EBL EBT �,.r WBT WBR x � 'r ' z�;`q SBL '. `SBR A Existin• 2011 0 285 y 't.. �. 316 0 �,.*,,",;:.,•,:,-,,:i..,:: x 0 0 B Growth factor 2% 2% +.. b �'s 2% 2% 4 •-r-„,-*,,,,-sf 1.•':"' ?5 2% j 2% C(b` ears*a Back: ound 0 114 r •, 126 0 0 4; 0 D Other trips 0 28 15 0 Ti'"" :-#' �XF 0 t 0 E a+c+d) No-build 2031 0 427 ' �; r z' 457 0 4L--.;4', �0.�s� r f` 0 sh 0 F site tri.s IN 1362 1362 Ky.: 3 1362 1362 ;� . •- k 4 1362 * 1362 G site tris OUT 975 975 ��'i''-lit 975 975 _ ct i a' 975 975 H •r.'ectdist%in 2% 29% r _xt i, 0% 4% _',ltii 4"#0,,', ttl 0% "r) 0% I r.'ect dist%out 0% 0% x£ ,•* 29% 0% ' 4% 2% ®Pr.'ect tri•s IN 20 388 _{I..* 0 48 + t i xt 0 �*�' 0 MERMEN Pr.'ect tri.s OUT 0 0 : ' t`r:, 278 0 *t.,'";--4 -`4"'`':` 'it' 34 15 L Pass-b tri. 0 0 ai;� Y, 0 0 ';',4,,,A,',..4.0,,,,,, 0 0 A _akw„ ter;. ,._'' *.t M(e+j+k+1) Build 2031 20 815 735 48 34 15 Trip Generation CD un r. in 02 01 iOTrON er141 L1 ^ M M LA in N 'a MNM N .-1 = tnLAO O O .�-1 N co It L^ VI og A .--I LOfn cn t1 lA n N N in r-1 r-1 a E c CL LLJ LA 00 OD OOlMO .-1NOOf�fQ1 � N Ilil VI 1-1� I� v .-1 er .-1 ▪ ib a CC 5 1pc0��pp ��pp pp�O0pppDD C3 O OOiOD �OION4N 01 .-I ttNa%%74 � � 1-4 1-1 = b 0 OD "' N I- N C O 1 a A « aaa €"aaaaaaaa w8. LAUlLn (ALA2Ln ofLs-LyfLcatx N8 ? .,-1 .N-1Nr T-4 VI NOMN O M CO V) .'-1 V) O ^ N tal a � a C) S 5 LL c S? E 2 t Lo g ani ? 21 c > ig .o z > .ft 6 a s c o $3 0. I o• --- c'� 1 Cil r. _ � fi �% ° -@ .28"2212@i ov Nat o 13 o th 2 a. Q j M in C CO CO Ln C •P f0 LT _ > 7 ? N E >.8 �, cL° �° 4o _ = = a C�apJ, �1ai -p c O 1Yp Yp U d C O C ` C O p p C N M z \ E � c 0• .0ccc � gc 1oE . (� latt 41 .6 g v w N it K1 U^ Q Eo 0 8 (INF u < 2 _2 C p W O- pDp t �.I o E � N � S S C3 Crl a � eEi Av ON� S▪0r rn ,Ey � Ivaatco N C C VI u'S 1!1 8 m m g�j � ^ Ajo .2.po ., E O O O .-r in U O C N g cc .�I '' i 2 8 d 8 m o v $ 8 Ino � 3 o 2 Q -1 .-I e-1 0 V- N d' Q� .-I .-I N 11 M �j .1 .I fig 2 19 9 (A 5In Ib- m_ _¢_ U _U T .! N C� � k g�$ � N � m C m $ g 2 8_ g g 0 a c c In n � � M a a V pp — N G o p `3 V G t0 .-t .-1 0 ..1 u1 W w(E .i N .I O To .-I.-I N N i07 L m E N d a O 4 E "'1 m\ Q \ fr1 v-I CV \ O E m `- _ E Iso m p !Nn a 2 g_ 28__, m H 7. aEii' P3 i� E c m 23 .R S raLuE 8 8 3 D u5in12 tJ W la u N t0 ss m m I� it U— - `Q gt, "§ Ms -� oMD g �, u .-1 .a rn er E 2 � �0 000 0 C C W E � MI� � 1 1 • NS N N M O o O ,4 U st V O+ E � Eo h Sing 2 as E N R� C C Ph" M 8 8 m m �� .moi U cg Eg CN x110 .� �' 7_4 � '" S s 8 N O N O �� � 88 1 ? I gi ou $ N W tO s tOV' COV Cs ti EN § 2(A Elg Nm mE coE E s M2 s8_ 8 2 .Nm. ` N roe 6 8 8 V M . NT 1 7.14 7 O� 01 g NN O�n o 'O I- D B . _ 0 S Lf '~ a Q \ N000 0 C N '_OMNN s ' g E ;1 -1 MI 1d" 2 g_ oB 8_ m I- E 111173 Q Y Oyyf ` .o S togE 8 8' 361 5612 t Existing Signal Timing FARMINGTON TH 3 & CSAH 50 (Elm Street) 6/8/2011 15:41 By-Phase Timing Data Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Direction Minimum Green 7 20 0 10 7 20 0 10 0 0 0 0 Bike Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cond Sery Min Grn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 Ped Clearance 0 12 0 12 0 15 0 12 0 7 0 7 Veh Extension 3.0 3.5 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Alt Veh Exten 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Max Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max 1 20 60 0 40 20 60 0 40 0 0 0 0 Max 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Det. Fail Max 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 Yellow Change 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Red Clearance 2.0 1.5 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Red Revert 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Act. B4 Init 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sec/Actuation 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Max Initial 0 35 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time B4 Reduction 0 20 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cars Waiting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce 0 20 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Gap 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 m . ..,•, • i!iI!!iIUil ;i i I i 11\ n r 1 L, Num 1 :-bil 1 l a l 1 1 o l. �. �... 1 l • !ewes ela 6 :� o ' ' (�p� a B 144 r 41"1:11pp ^ I- W '� ye C^- 11�1 J ENV" 141aUe$ }1� ,j ® W -b 1 " ia g11 n c a i♦ o 1p3 M a 1 _ G I1°5§ 11 I �" I i^j' GCGccIivAl ritual iE !,:011: ♦" r � ``0• � o o uC��GiiiCGii e4 tebG I 6' O d\u �nry,llllro 11111111 1_.�1 y� brd ^ ,, iJl .i' jj„� 1� '1 1"1 1 'vl 1 h $* F IL�}�� '• fit' Ili . 9 ely 2 ift, ® V X er 4af:t �,--__ Qcinnouf� ,-,..-et � '�o' 7 1111 7 �I dW 0[) �- r-w •� CV 1. b '" `p �� I IS Iw-00 HYS3 c-sal , YI UyI n +o �) r h ~ t (� -rot- tip ..>o ..�.4 vavaa vovo:::.- ' � '`�'QO � ���. 42 Wea 4ekc ® __tS �" � 0 I 4�e lJ oo��, II I elMi �Ef'�6, ...v e$ m' ! 4. ' i8Qi p 1y,l 1ll l �. li a p uvula GGCIiC ( GGG4GGliG b. V k ® a I � it.ii I I,�j74n Mil e i u, Alg j 44 Q� 111111, 111111 h O es lb„ ii 1-S •11/11 I�1^-A.•Ill tl� eiN lilh100113,1115 tul lill II P Al . 'Zig05Wilanggl:.4.1.! 1 I I Nail" 11 4 11 1 O I4 1/111 a 11, I o t Eb_"..g" II n -- 1 I I E , m 1 .[ IP r I iP -ro v-/a r-wdM'©1111 11 og« 3 - } 1 ►t — 11 I mawmiQ�' 1�u ig ��a� I ��� 4g� „_ i _ m1.j. } F —. Ig 11991 I R 1i�01Ig g I I ..t::.a 45* c © I ij . 1 a ASC 8000/ASC 2 DIRECT CONNECT-EAST METRO TH 3 & (46) /160th St W # 6/8/2011 15:19 By-Phase Timing Data Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Direction SBLT NB3 WBLT EB NBLT SB3 EBLT WB Minimum Green 7 20 7 20 7 20 7 20 0 0 0 0 Bike Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cond Sery Min Grn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 Ped Clearance 0 23 0 15 0 24 0 17 0 7 0 7 Veh Extension 2.5 6.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 6.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Alt Veh Exten 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Max Extension 0 5 0 10 0 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 Max 1 30 60 30 45 30 60 30 45 0 0 0 0 Max 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max 3 0 75 0 65 0 75 0 65 0 0 0 0 Det. Fail Max 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow Change 3.0 5.5 3.0 5.5 3.0 5.5 3.0 5.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Red Clearance 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Red Revert 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Act. B4 Init 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sec/Actuation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Max Initial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time B4 Reduction 0 20 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cars Waiting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce 0 20 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Gap 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 nVB min HIM . a di -I W R u Ln w gsi, embmb N II ti 6 s J n m ° z z. P-1 t z o A _ t� I-LI V. at . 9 1 ��r��'1i1 E n I b o , 3,,,,,,,,,..z l- M i .l �6m 4 II ii7 fOv ZOm=Q 0 W R .400..►. :1. I\\ fir— 1 0 0 I-. - o t7 64 il F 2. gg c r ►.r a h � p Nom:. �oNe"t ra h ,,, r ifigHillig SI1 .19NIItiNOOb 1 •w.t9� Z H=�7777 N .,`a` o g Q p p 1'~ al-Ina. N 1.10 `J W W w N\\ 1� 1 W FWyI 8ek. O 1 1n n �JZO. U' n W 6114 N� /I NMI.I+ J SI W Z 11 +•j•j•4• sips I N & "' m I@ ' 010104401d2 w=�� 11 N il ; 00 n 1 10 14 0 01.8 gi W w G / O p U V u F• QN.+tllm.lrto <pO a�J m W tj itg2•. gryyl3'7.X.� vJ.ii,ir f~.1 `36 t,-, n �. 1GiN G•Mb.'- I _ ,lh jd/tow 4144 uNg§ 7i 1 n NQ > NC1<- $� �~ ♦� 7,1 J J t ttttll v n •��I�r1• v c WN...cool u tal a W • gp 01 N"n ra 4i." 1y< 11 T1\�� ltyo (D N $1Arg,- �6N.2 J�nW`j G II J I •Ste-OOAWCi:10 N1gid dpf C F1<W '.4f n IiL� W L r1i/l k�o�>..a auto .�v_. i93 p m a°S CCJ.J00. l 1Al��Q TQ 1M�1 w{1 .tle7 A.4 W = V U n NN Ntl y0 I��`10 2a\\m �`� 1Qz H RRR W w.. 1t��'i'I`\ �, 1 tIy,�1LL�ca 6 N N E.F 0 J N... 0010.1 m.[g: 2V.1." FWIg': a TW1~ N N,. A NU n . N\U\UU �© r��O Emil 4 0 Q� m IL� n :14= •N.NNQ N 201 VINOZ . N wN �( 1 0 N 1O11 .rr:�tl �eN�NON Q 4{J J N w.91;0.01.000..i NN �I n QQwwmN © UU . i • N� Ei;`,:I,,:2ae�;..ig. slit i,� o ,_ 442.664 .�T% a RahcvN\n\N Nw�:. 77 ^ II 0 If I II 333 ,, '3 ...OGt I QN..YII�f.. NN .+N..QQ 0)N NQ // ■ 1 1� �fi U t® ` 1 -3333C_3-3 I a - --"_—=immNIS1 •i',hi!, 1'4 450 `4 o■ u (�94 liMI1 083dS a31SOdf _ 9b N►59 -f �INJIa! —�Qr- 4_1___401 1 1 g I _,_. -' •II ■I --- z AS aer � J _- -_— - - � ■ I' ■� 4500 i ... _ - -- - - - um it i "i Nan"99 unn u�3as a3isod, �tt�—q m e ---9b NVSO —0. -n U .. _.,I --N11 ■. • @ u -.33 ^ 3c3a3c33e.a3^3_ 1 z ,y W Oil ® ®EJO ''/// N O • -- -_ J 1- Cis ® I. ,/* -NNWO M M<L). {{�y1 WW 33 / UUrUt G 1 V 072`© ■ Oil/ 1 s^ EM":' <6 O KM.Hs' > y r \� / i U, • I I I 111 .. ¢ $� •\\ I /// VN�Nr!, H QntvmlI I 'N.NIv �.1'.t ill R'-I oU.Lt®zs z H I yJ NC OON U. a a �� Q u •.• to' J to Ll k- Ea11! ■ ii 2N o- Ng 1-Mrf 1- - J O- 1- u.2010/.. W .5.1a0,1„,N NN j N^..li . u.2 0 -I 11 N I I W..J w J VO = r • 11 m n pl n r r b e ., o1fy So 1- N At v{y ,A 0. 1 OHLtj N m 1 Mai m I .' N�JJ 1 B. J9 a N i I Intl pNW�0 arr. N W SCO U W N 1 .m '1((M�, l aOW < R 0y10 J 1 NIA Id- � l�p!�p��u(( �Y�m--N ma� r MOQ y/aN Tzy Fy4-� US1O11.�� 1 '2.1 S 6 N n(4=84&200 S m U'^ib N .J g1 d �m v .1ya,,m... N m i .Q. IBJ. PQTO®mml.mO- 1 NNO1 .VI 012 IWI�5 E N {Qy i wLLH er w �..-. H. b 001`ig N~r� ..i'0. WKf�N2:6' 1- 1 4 W F.N. +�� Q•� N pp Q Iy,1I u\ tI r<s 11 1.4 i1 {y�1 L•ii yp61 c"I oy e+ Tc y�• S —�-1 �v _._r-T� 110 a W W u' W 4'N\\ Mlly2'S p.W OR....1UI `• � n''' 00:\ 1 j 1 p T3 �N IT, 0..4.1:117.. G G yay1 10yM 0. yWW� 1, `� E CNNFLLCM4FF aN ANN.. 4 1 -(L. N.N0 gm E N If N a O 1 II O .. 1 C+ N!1V a Lt I 0 1 HHH .3. BNFL MUM . 3NON N90'VIBSZZ\SBSZZ\Q4I Inu-8V\el IB.n)0AB1S\o/Agnl\IS 131R/N31Id ZS I60 5002-rS-60 t031101d Synchro Output Existing Year 2011 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: 160th St W& TH 3 6/14/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 44+ ! 19 ft r ) + r iii t r Volume(vph) 240 365 50 40 257 48 165 388 124 41 119 68 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 56 53 86 76 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 55 55 Link Distance(ft) 7135 4969 536 1032 Travel Time(s) 88.5 61.6 6.6 12.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 267 406 56 44 286 53 183 431 138 46 132 76 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.5 27.5 14.0 27.5 27.5 Total Split(s) 32.0 45.0 45.0 14.0 27.0 27.0 26.0 47.0 47.0 14.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split(%) 26.7% 37.5% 37.5% 11.7% 22.5% 22.5% 21.7% 39.2% 39.2% 11.7% 29.2% 29.2% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.5 7.5 5.0 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 20.2 30.2 30.2 15.8 20.3 20.3 15.6 35.8 35.8 8.0 22.7 22.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.29 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.22 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.77 0.39 0.11 0.16 0.41 0.15 0.69 0.67 0.23 0.34 0.32 0.19 Control Delay 56.2 35.9 11.1 39.9 41.0 12.5 57.0 37.4 13.0 56.3 38.5 9.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.2 35.9 11.1 39.9 41.0 12.5 57.0 37.4 13.0 56.3 38.5 9.7 LOS E D B D D B E D B E D A Approach Delay 41.4 36.9 37.7 33.1 Approach LOS D D D C Queue Length 50th(ft) 264 204 0 38 138 0 182 419 40 46 119 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 457 324 57 101 243 58 337 656 122 119 230 64 Internal Link Dist(ft) 7055 4889 456 952 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 467 1345 637 285 693 352 364 720 665 156 501 481 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seed/Genstar AUAR 6/9/2011 2011 AM Existing Synchro 7- Report Bonestroo Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: 160th St W& TH 3 6/14/2011 C k t �► 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 0.30 0.09 0.15 0.41 0.15 0.50 0.60 0.21 0.29 0.26 0.16 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 103.7 Natural Cycle:85 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.77 Intersection Signal Delay:38.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min)15 Splits and Phases: 5: 160th St W&TH 3 t01 02 04 '' 03 I F 05 • 06 08 07 Seed/Genstar AUAR 6/9/2011 2011 AM Existing Synchro 7- Report Bonestroo Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: Elm St & TH 3 6/13/2011 s -♦ 1. 4 4\ T P `► d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¶ 1:r 4+ ¶ +I- ' '9 +t Volume(vph) 177 9 87 2 61 35 130 327 0 3 180 245 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 0 0 0 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1608 0 0 1772 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.810 0.995 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1509 1608 0 0 1764 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 92 33 258 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 45 45 Link Distance(ft) 3432 506 3700 1290 Travel Time(s) 78.0 11.5 56.1 19.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 186 101 0 0 103 0 137 344 0 3 189 258 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split(s) 34.0 34.0 0.0 34.0 34.0 0.0 23.0 44.0 44.0 12.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split(%) 37.8% 37.8% 0.0% 37.8% 37.8% 0.0% 25.6% 48.9% 48.9% 13.3% 36.7% 36.7% Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 14.4 14.4 14.4 10.3 30.9 7.3 20.7 20.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.17 0.52 0.12 0.35 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.22 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.01 0.15 0.36 Control Delay 26.1 7.1 15.4 29.0 9.4 28.3 17.0 4.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.1 7.1 15.4 29.0 9.4 28.3 17.0 4.7 LOS C A B C A C B A Approach Delay 19.4 15.4 15.0 10.0 Approach LOS B B B B Queue Length 50th(ft) 96 4 33 73 42 2 40 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 197 56 92 166 135 14 94 82 Internal Link Dist(ft) 3352 426 3620 1210 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 754 850 898 559 2358 218 1675 885 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seed/Genstar AUAR 6/9/2011 2011 AM Existing Synchro 7- Report Bonestroo Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: Elm St & TH 3 6/13/2011 -A -- - , c ~ t 4\ t , \* 4, I Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.25 0.12 0.11 0.25 0.15 0.01 0.11 0.29 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:59.1 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.51 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min)15 Splits and Phases: 16:Elm St&TH 3♦ I" 01 I 02 04 F m5 m6 08 Seed/Genstar AUAR 6/9/2011 2011 AM Existing Synchro 7- Report Bonestroo Page 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 170th St & TH 3 6/13/2011 �► C `_ k- 4\ t t ■ 4' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4+ ' 1+ 4 r Volume(veh/h) 81 11 32 4 4 30 105 670 11 19 232 27 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly flow rate(vph) 94 13 37 5 5 35 122 779 13 22 270 31 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) 5 Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1374 1350 270 1369 1375 785 301 792 vC1,stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu,unblocked vol 1374 1350 270 1369 1375 785 301 792 tC,single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 5 90 95 95 96 91 90 97 cM capacity(veh/h) 99 132 769 99 128 392 1260 829 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 144 44 122 792 292 31 Volume Left 94 5 122 0 22 0 Volume Right 37 35 0 13 0 31 cSH 137 257 1260 1700 829 1700 Volume to Capacity 1.05 0.17 0.10 0.47 0.03 0.02 Queue Length 95th(ft) 312 24 13 0 3 0 Control Delay(s) 154.7 21.9 8.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 Lane LOS F C A A Approach Delay(s) 154.7 21.9 1.1 0.9 Approach LOS F C Intersection Summary Average Delay 17.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 Seed/Genstar AUAR 6/9/2011 2011 AM Existing Synchro 7- Report Bonestroo Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: driveway & TH 3 6/13/2011 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4, 4+ 15 4 r 'it r Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 120 0 72 0 470 75 12 311 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 0 0 126 0 76 0 495 79 13 327 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 923 926 327 847 847 495 327 574 vC1,stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu,unblocked vol 923 926 327 847 847 495 327 574 tC,single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 55 100 87 100 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 215 265 714 279 295 575 1232 999 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 0 202 0 495 79 13 327 0 Volume Left 0 126 0 0 0 13 0 0 Volume Right 0 76 0 0 79 0 0 0 cSH 1700 346 1700 1700 1700 999 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.29 0.05 0.01 0.19 0.00 Queue Length 95th(ft) 0 141 0 0 0 2 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.0 29.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A D A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 29.1 0.0 0.3 Approach LOS A D Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Seed/Genstar AUAR 6/9/2011 2011 AM Existing Synchro 7- Report Bonestroo Page 2 SimTraffic Performance Report Seed/Genstar AUAR 2011 AM Existing 6/13/2011 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Delay(hr) 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 Delay/Veh(s) 8.0 11.4 4.7 9.8 14.3 6.7 10.4 11.4 8.7 9.2 9.9 8.7 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Performance by movement Movement An Total Delay(hr) 2.8 Delay/Veh(s) 10.2 Bonestroo SimTraffic Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12011 Farmington AM existing.syn Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Seed/Genstar AUAR 2011 AM Existing 6/13/2011 Intersection: 17: 195th St &Akin Rd Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LTR LT R L T R L T R Maximum Queue(ft) 151 130 48 48 72 54 43 73 60 Average Queue(ft) 41 51 22 24 39 28 19 33 25 95th Queue(ft) 84 89 45 37 62 47 40 56 40 Link Distance(ft) 2987 5893 812 843 Upstream Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 Storage Blk Time(%) 1 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 Bonestroo SimTraffic Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12011 Farmington AM existing.syn Page 2 U)U)U)U) \U < NM �NON WQ NNNN Q• Nm. • 7 U)Lf)U)Lf) Lf)U)Lf) 2dddCt U)U)U)U) m00 Minta CCCLCsE T-17-11-11-1 I-11-4 a E E4 E\Q NNNN Z U 0 Q E c:0000 00 W0 a O NNNN DWW 0 ONN:Xi\ +Udt-�WY XP-4 mama a 0000 UJWOW>W 1(J)I-Uc -a LUL1)L)U) J NNNN JW2W333 • • • • •� ;=E0)E000 0000 --F•-•aF-www 0000 U)U7 U7I.fl W u_0000 " .-1 00000 0 Ny,-I.-I,--I,--I 1 N QcOON00 r•+ WOO Ul • Co •C .`;O0DO000 N L�flo00,1 • . . r: r.,--� . . MR d i(OOU)0 ++ %L. ,-f00 '--4 NMI" •+0000 • 1 X ., a, 0000000 mrn,-10 CO ONOO O)OAD000 4N0d-Oti0 W00 • m0,-100d'0( OOU )O •-{ .-400 NN, 'DONO 001.00000 Z�0'O0 t ON00 (O0Q000 7 N00 d 0(Y)0U)0 OhN+-IN X00 v '-I N N d- MQ00 00 P 0000 W a m0.00m0 s �► u,ss • • • NNNN 00cc0b01 r, 1•0C OMO X0000 > >-4-4 > > 11 N +-+ N N d' 0 • • • • EE 2 >-}WW� wmmmm >-<<DD� cn E E E EJ EW -(OWZ3 i-JJWW s U) HWWDD 2 2 UOa00 °+ OP-4<< 0m0m0 awxwx w2O\2QN a>a>a •; x '�1: 5: 160th St W& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2011 PM Existing 6/13/2011 s -♦ f 1- k- 4\ t \ r Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) f? r ) ft- r vi t r ) t r Volume(vph) 117 391 123 92 355 72 77 234 50 70 434 193 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 134 80 56 132 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 55 55 Link Distance(ft) 7135 4969 536 1032 Travel Time(s) 88.5 61.6 6.6 12.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 130 434 137 102 394 80 86 260 56 78 482 214 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.5 27.5 14.0 27.5 27.5 Total Split(s) 21.0 30.0 30.0 18.0 27.0 27.0 17.0 56.0 56.0 16.0 55.0 55.0 Total Split(%) 17.5% 25.0% 25.0% 15.0% 22.5% 22.5% 14.2% 46.7% 46.7% 13.3% 45.8% 45.8% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.5 7.5 5.0 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 12.1 25.0 25.0 11.3 20.8 20.8 9.9 32.0 32.0 9.4 31.6 31.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.12 0.22 0.22 0.10 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.33 0.33 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.47 0.27 0.49 0.52 0.20 0.47 0.42 0.10 0.45 0.79 0.35 Control Delay 54.7 37.7 9.0 52.9 40.0 10.8 54.9 27.9 6.6 55.3 40.5 12.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 54.7 37.7 9.0 52.9 40.0 10.8 54.9 27.9 6.6 55.3 40.5 12.0 LOS D D A D D B D C A E D B Approach Delay 35.2 38.2 30.7 34.1 Approach LOS D D C C Queue Length 50th(ft) 125 211 2 97 188 0 83 204 0 75 443 59 Queue Length 95th(ft) 256 350 90 214 328 70 188 331 42 175 675 154 Internal Link Dist(ft) 7055 4889 456 952 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 305 977 534 252 764 404 229 975 855 210 955 876 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12011 Farmington PM existing.syn Page 2 5: 160th St W& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2011 PM Existing 6/13/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.44 0.26 0.40 0.52 0.20 0.38 0.27 0.07 0.37 0.50 0.24 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length:96.4 Natural Cycle:85 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.79 Intersection Signal Delay:34.8 Intersection LOS:C Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: 160th St W&TH 3 m1 t 02 04 •r 03 05 4— f 06 08 07 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2011 Farmington PM existing.syn Page 3 16: Elm St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2011 PM Existing 6/13/2011 J f 4- a ' 4\ 1 / \. 1 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 'F, 4+ "j 4jL r " 11' rr Volume(vph) 284 55 180 0 36 16 154 295 0 10 375 222 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 0 0 0 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1649 0 0 1786 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.720 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1341 1649 0 0 1786 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 196 17 241 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 45 45 Link Distance(ft) 3432 506 3700 1290 Travel Time(s) 78.0 11.5 56.1 19.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 309 256 0 0 56 0 167 321 0 11 408 241 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split(s) 39.0 39.0 0.0 39.0 39.0 0.0 21.0 39.0 39.0 12.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split(%) 43.3% 43.3% 0.0% 43.3% 43.3% 0.0% 23.3% 43.3% 43.3% 13.3% 33.3% 33.3% Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 21.9 21.9 21.9 11.8 35.7 7.2 20.8 20.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.17 0.50 0.10 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.40 0.10 0.57 0.18 0.06 0.40 0.38 Control Delay 34.6 7.3 13.5 37.6 12.7 35.7 24.0 5.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.6 7.3 13.5 37.6 12.7 35.7 24.0 5.8 LOS C A B D B D C A Approach Delay 22.2 13.5 21.2 17.5 Approach LOS C B C B Queue Length 50th(ft) 190 29 19 108 56 7 120 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 357 114 60 236 157 35 233 90 Internal Link Dist(ft) 3352 426 3620 1210 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 645 895 868 407 1798 178 1220 704 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2011 Farmington PM existing.syn Page 6 16: Elm St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2011 PM Existing 6/13/2011 -• C ~ t 4\ t P 1 d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.29 0.06 0.41 0.18 0.06 0.33 0.34 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:71.4 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.9 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min)15 Splits and Phases: 16:Elm St&TH 3 m1 t 02 04 4\ 05 iT 06 08 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2011 Farmington PM existing.syn Page 7 4: 170th St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2011 PM Existing 6/13/2011 -0 c 4- 4\ t d Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r 4 t 4 r Volume(veh/h) 44 7 102 16 7 10 74 309 10 11 574 117 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate(vph) 46 7 107 17 7 11 78 325 11 12 604 123 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) 5 Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1123 1119 604 1171 1237 331 727 336 vC1,stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu,unblocked vol 1123 1119 604 1171 1237 331 727 336 tC,single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 71 96 78 86 95 99 91 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 161 187 498 119 159 711 876 1223 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 161 35 78 336 616 123 Volume Left 46 17 78 0 12 0 Volume Right 107 11 0 11 0 123 cSH 494 172 876 1700 1223 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.20 0.09 0.20 0.01 0.07 Queue Length 95th(ft) 56 29 12 0 1 0 Control Delay(s) 21.8 31.2 9.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 Lane LOS C D A A Approach Delay(s) 21.8 31.2 1.8 0.2 Approach LOS C D Intersection Summary Average Delay 4.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12011 Farmington PM existing.syn Page 1 10: driveway & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2011 PM Existing l 6/13/2011 I' -♦ •r '- k" 4\ t /* \* ■ 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 "I 4 r vi t r Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 94 0 34 0 389 116 59 530 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 0 0 101 0 37 0 418 125 63 570 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1152 1240 570 1115 1115 418 570 543 vC 1,stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu,unblocked vol 1152 1240 570 1115 1115 418 570 543 tC,single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 43 100 94 100 94 cM capacity(veh/h) 157 164 521 176 195 635 1003 1026 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 0 138 0 418 125 63 570 0 Volume Left 0 101 0 0 0 63 0 0 Volume Right 0 37 0 0 125 0 0 0 cSH 1700 218 1700 1700 1700 1026 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.25 0.07 0.06 0.34 0.00 Queue Length 95th(ft) 0 149 0 0 0 8 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.0 46.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A E A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 46.0 0.0 0.9 Approach LOS A E Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2011 Farmington PM existing.syn Page 2 SimTraffic Performance Report Seed/Genstar AUAR 2011 PM Existing 6/13/2011 17: 195th St &Akin Rd Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Delay(hr) 0.1 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.9 0.2 Delay/Veh(s) 17.9 20.3 13.5 14.9 19.0 9.3 12.8 13.9 8.9 13.6 14.8 11.4 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Performance by movement Movement All Total Delay(hr) 5.4 Delay/Veh(s) 15.1 Bonestroo SimTraffic Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2011 Farmington PM existing.syn Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Seed/Genstar AUAR 2011 PM Existing 6/13/2011 Intersection: 17: 195th St &Akin Rd Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LTR LT R L T R L T R Maximum Queue(ft) 210 115 49 48 116 52 67 97 84 Average Queue(ft) 86 68 24 24 48 25 30 57 26 95th Queue(ft) 161 100 46 42 83 43 57 91 54 Link Distance(ft) 2987 5893 812 843 Upstream Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 Storage Blk Time(%) 1 1 0 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 1 0 0 Bonestroo SimTraffic Report C:1Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12011 Farmington PM existing.syn Page 2 oI U)U)U)U) j Oh¢¢ N't gi o N,IN0Nwa Nf�l�f_ U) Nm • 7 U)U)U)U) MMM •q,:rd-cr JU)U)U)U) m00 w# C C C L Ct E lI..r1,-I,-I,-I F-+H a in i EEE\ E >\ NNNN o U 30 HI- 0 00 OO.E 1� mmlgm� oo wo 3 a c O\ONONON 11 DWW 0 ONONO\O\ .X1-1 Maga 0000 I. LIJO)OW>W r LW JOO J-a LDLOILOL L1W3W333 • • • • • EwEOOO 0000 '14, -1'W1-4JJJ -1-al-Lu 0000 U)U)U)U) -00c0 +-I 00000 L.1....- ,-, t..- :Nq3N°° 0300D O� •00M0000 N 00 • C '(: Loc000 N t0(T)0Ui�i • 4-1 NNd 0000 x W� 001)0000 U).-I0TI ON0c0000 C00 0000 4-10MO'0 ON71-0,-1 00000 ,-IOC t0() 0U) 0 rI 00 rI NNd' .-4.-'00 N0.D0 001 0000 U)OM0 ' [t7tNU)I-IN 60.000 ,1,-1,4.H NN r0M00 '''CONT-1(2101-100 V MS@ft x MY-14-100 w W 00M0000 '5- E O)0\0000 C In Ins.0 Ct0O)0U)0 0000 > >-4-1 > > 1 ; o ,-I NN7t 0 - - EE d rl, w 4, --,r •�,r-,r,r,d wmmm 7-«non vI E E E EM EW EWWZ3 I-JJWW s W ..w%-,%.0s-,�+..(A Q ►-+WWDD - W Z 2 2 00000 a 00+-001- IIC a I.. °� W aHaa 0 0 0 •MWXW •. <II-••la WIO'2Oh <><>< • M = IJJ7aaow _.11,11,_.11,11_.11,11,-1 Uaz<E I W' Year 2031 No-Build 5: 160th St W& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM No-Build 6/14/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ii +1 r 'i it j 11 tt r ' 11 r Volume(vph) 336 523 71 59 372 68 232 578 177 58 179 95 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 71 76 149 106 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 55 55 Link Distance(ft) 7135 4969 536 1032 Travel Time(s) 88.5 61.6 6.6 12.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 373 581 79 66 413 76 258 642 197 64 199 106 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.5 27.5 14.0 27.5 27.5 Total Split(s) 36.0 48.0 48.0 15.0 27.0 27.0 28.0 43.0 43.0 14.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split(%) 30.0% 40.0% 40.0% 12.5% 22.5% 22.5% 23.3% 35.8% 35.8% 11.7% 24.2% 24.2% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.5 7.5 5.0 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 27.2 30.9 30.9 19.2 20.1 20.1 20.1 34.8 34.8 8.4 20.3 20.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.27 0.27 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.60 0.16 0.22 0.65 0.22 0.81 0.59 0.33 0.48 0.31 0.28 Control Delay 62.4 40.8 10.6 42.8 49.6 11.3 65.4 36.9 11.2 65.0 43.1 10.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.4 40.8 10.6 42.8 49.6 11.3 65.4 36.9 11.2 65.0 43.1 10.3 LOS ED BDD B EDB ED B Approach Delay 46.3 43.6 38.9 37.5 Approach LOS D D D D Queue Length 50th(ft) 427 350 8 66 251 0 299 358 43 76 113 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) #673 426 68 141 344 69 #492 462 141 152 173 79 Internal Link Dist(ft) 7055 4889 456 952 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 491 1322 636 314 634 346 365 1150 615 143 681 390 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Userslisraelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington AM nobuild.syn Page 1 5: 160th St W& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM No-Build 6/14/2011 c ~ 4\ t / `► 1 d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.76 0.44 0.12 0.21 0.65 0.22 0.71 0.56 0.32 0.45 0.29 0.27 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 112.4 Natural Cycle:95 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.87 Intersection Signal Delay:42.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 5: 160th St W&TH 3 y t 01 02 04 c 03 05 4 4-06 08 07 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM nobuild.syn Page 2 16: Elm St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM No-Build 6/14/2011 f -0' ' !i • '- k 4\ t P i' 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 'F, 4, 'I tt 1' '1 f} ? Volume(vph) 248 13 122 3 85 49 182 465 0 4 273 343 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 0 0 0 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1611 0 0 1770 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.679 0.995 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1265 1611 0 0 1763 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 128 33 361 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 45 45 Link Distance(ft) 3432 506 3700 1290 Travel Time(s) 78.0 11.5 56.1 19.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 261 142 0 0 144 0 192 489 0 4 287 361 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split(s) 34.0 34.0 0.0 34.0 34.0 0.0 23.0 44.0 44.0 12.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split(%) 37.8% 37.8% 0.0% 37.8% 37.8% 0.0% 25.6% 48.9% 48.9% 13.3% 36.7% 36.7% Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 19.7 19.7 19.7 12.8 36.3 7.1 20.4 20.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.52 0.10 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.26 0.28 0.59 0.27 0.02 0.28 0.50 Control Delay 35.6 6.3 16.5 35.3 11.9 33.8 22.3 5.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 35.6 6.3 16.5 35.3 11.9 33.8 22.3 5.9 LOS D A B D B C C A Approach Delay 25.3 16.5 18.5 13.3 Approach LOS C B B B Queue Length 50th(ft) 159 7 57 121 84 3 79 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 306 67 131 245 216 18 160 104 Internal Link Dist(ft) 3352 426 3620 1210 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 527 746 754 466 1993 181 1397 843 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington AM nobuild.syn Page 6 16: Elm St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM No-Build 6/14/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.19 0.19 0.41 0.25 0.02 0.21 0.43 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:69.8 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.73 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.0 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min)15 Splits and Phases: 16:Elm St&TH 3 t 01 02 04 05 06 4--- 08 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM nobuild.syn Page 7 4: 170th St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM No-Build 6/14/2011 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4+ '1 ft 41- r Volume(veh/h) 113 15 45 6 6 42 147 973 15 27 337 38 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly flow rate(vph) 131 17 52 7 7 49 171 1131 17 31 392 44 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) 5 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1415 1945 196 1749 1981 574 436 1149 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 455 455 1482 1482 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 960 1491 267 499 vCu,unblocked vol 1415 1945 196 1749 1981 574 436 1149 tC,single(s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 18 86 94 93 95 89 85 95 cM capacity(veh/h) 161 121 812 107 145 462 1120 604 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 201 63 171 754 395 162 261 44 Volume Left 131 7 171 0 0 31 0 0 Volume Right 52 49 0 0 17 0 0 44 cSH 209 286 1120 1700 1700 604 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.96 0.22 0.15 0.44 0.23 0.05 0.15 0.03 Queue Length 95th(ft) 329 33 22 0 0 7 0 0 Control Delay(s) 101.0 21.1 8.8 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F C A A Approach Delay(s) 101.0 21.1 1.1 0.9 Approach LOS F C Intersection Summary Average Delay 11.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM nobuild.syn Page 1 10: driveway & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM No-Build I 6/14/2011 f .- " ' f 4- & 4\ 1 P `► 7 I Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ "i 44 r 'i +t r Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 172 0 112 0 664 106 21 452 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 0 0 181 0 118 0 699 112 22 476 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 987 1331 238 981 1219 349 476 811 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 520 520 699 699 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 467 811 282 520 vCu,unblocked vol 987 1331 238 981 1219 349 476 811 tC,single(s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 51 100 82 100 97 cM capacity(veh/h) 347 321 763 367 364 647 1083 811 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 NB 4 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 SB 4 Volume Total 0 299 0 349 349 112 22 238 238 0 Volume Left 0 181 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 118 0 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 442 1700 1700 1700 1700 811 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.07 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.00 Queue Length 95th(ft) 0 196 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.0 28.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A D A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 28.5 0.0 0.4 Approach LOS A D Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington AM nobuild.syn Page 2 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM No-Build 6/15/2011 f c ~ t 4\ t P �► ♦ d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4r 'it l II + r Volume(vph) 18 162 108 108 234 56 120 193 98 35 172 67 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1762 0 0 1833 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.961 0.803 0.626 0.612 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1699 0 0 1496 1583 1166 1863 1583 1140 1863 1583 Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 74 68 120 82 Link Speed(mph) 40 50 45 45 Link Distance(ft) 3038 5971 846 881 Travel Time(s) 51.8 81.4 12.8 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 352 0 0 417 68 146 235 120 43 210 82 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split(s) 36.0 36.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Total Split(%) 60.0% 60.0% 0.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Min Act Effct Green(s) 16.5 16.5 16.5 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.65 0.10 0.43 0.43 0.22 0.13 0.39 0.16 Control Delay 8.4 14.6 2.8 17.2 15.2 4.6 13.1 14.6 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.4 14.6 2.8 17.2 15.2 4.6 13.1 14.6 4.8 LOS A B A BB A BB A Approach Delay 8.4 12.9 13.2 12.0 Approach LOS A B B B Queue Length 50th(ft) 52 89 0 35 57 0 9 50 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 142 229 20 116 162 37 42 145 31 Internal Link Dist(ft) 2958 5891 766 801 Turn Bay Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 Base Capacity(vph) 1415 1235 1319 623 994 901 608 994 883 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM nobuild.syn Page 1 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM No-Build 6/15/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.25 0.34 0.05 0.23 0.24 0.13 0.07 0.21 0.09 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:60 Actuated Cycle Length:38.6 Natural Cycle:45 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.65 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.9 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min)15 Splits and Phases: 17: 195th St&Akin Rd t02 ---► 04 1ms 4— 08 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington AM nobuild.syn Page 2 IM 0 Lf)U)Lf)U) maa NOLs Ki OiNONW< NNrN • N •-IC � • > U)U)U)Lf) U)U)U) d d d'd- ,-1, 1,-1 O il : t JLf)U)U)U) u10[7 Wit C C C L Cs E L ,- L•-i,-{,-11 .-it-.-4+ Q r iR\ \ Q NNNN D U DO HF- ' 0 U\ 0000 (DU) 2U) 0 Q E 00 W O •' M 7'['d- t JJ >Oj O W W 0 NNNN R. O\O"O'O\ -+Uaf-�•-•�WY Y i C!) < ...61616161 I JU)OW]-W 0 F L LWI-UW�-a JU)U)U)L.f) J LNNL`-fes i .LIWDW333 •e EZWE000 OQOC F-+W F•,+J J J 1-1P-Q'F-LLLLLL �J0000 Lf)U)Lf)Lf) m 0 u_0000 Z 006100 _I . . . . Lf) LL*-4,1 co - ONNU)OO N D lf) 00 C r wOOM0OGQ NOtiNM1/4D,-ice d'm(OU)0 ++ r\I°Q ,-+ NNd -40000 I II x 0000000 iKrONON ; MNNCNO0 0000000 4.11-1000,-1 ; 000'@0 mO( ,-10 MO cJQNCU)Qt ,-1 ,-100 ,-+ N N d' R 1ONNm r- ooN 00060000 NOONC - 1NO tOC y (OOQQQ mN0m m d'OMOMO U)O'NO NO0 /:_ O NNd � m 0z 0000000 as 0000000 s u1 piss NNNN 4QCCOO M COONOMO 0000 > >.- - > > ' o +-i NNd' U • • EE N a,--i, w »-wwR }, ..„-,,-, a m m m m >‹C.c=n 0 ,_., E E E ETI EW ... U)WZ3 I-JJWW s �..�ti..v -U) < �WWDD +' 6 Z 2 2 UOa0O 0 °1 ui 01-1‹.‹ 0 0000 awxwx *-� - 421-4c wIm2CT6>a ►a ' _J>maow _11,-1 <m<xl m x IF F- 5: 160th St W& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM No-Build 6/14/2011 J -♦ " ' f ~ & 4\ t /' `► 1 d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) t+ r 11 tt r ' f4 r vi tt r Volume(vph) 164 551 172 131 507 102 109 352 71 99 651 270 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 141 88 79 201 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 55 55 Link Distance(ft) 7135 4969 536 1032 Travel Time(s) 88.5 61.6 6.6 12.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 182 612 191 146 563 113 121 391 79 110 723 300 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.5 27.5 14.0 27.5 27.5 Total Split(s) 25.0 36.0 36.0 22.0 33.0 33.0 19.0 42.0 42.0 20.0 43.0 43.0 Total Split(%) 20.8% 30.0% 30.0% 18.3% 27.5% 27.5% 15.8% 35.0% 35.0% 16.7% 35.8% 35.8% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.5 7.5 5.0 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 15.5 24.6 24.6 14.0 23.2 23.2 11.6 28.4 28.4 11.5 28.3 28.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.11 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.27 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.73 0.40 0.61 0.71 0.27 0.61 0.40 0.16 0.56 0.75 0.52 Control Delay 57.8 43.4 13.9 56.3 44.5 14.2 60.6 33.0 8.0 57.9 40.5 14.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 57.8 43.4 13.9 56.3 44.5 14.2 60.6 33.0 8.0 57.9 40.5 14.8 LOS ED B ED BEC A ED B Approach Delay 40.4 42.4 35.3 35.4 Approach LOS D D D D Queue Length 50th(ft) 190 328 43 151 302 22 127 180 0 115 376 83 Queue Length 95th(ft) 339 474 153 285 448 104 248 278 59 226 529 228 Internal Link Dist(ft) 7055 4889 456 952 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 349 1013 554 297 908 472 245 1205 591 262 1240 685 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM nobuild.syn Page 1 5: 160th St W& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM No-Build 6/14/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.52 0.60 0.34 0.49 0.62 0.24 0.49 0.32 0.13 0.42 0.58 0.44 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 103.6 Natural Cycle:85 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.75 Intersection Signal Delay:38.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min)15 Splits and Phases: 5: 16 t 0th St W&TH 3 ! 01 02 —0" 04 • 03 I 4— 05 $ 06 08 07 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM nobuild.syn Page 2 16: Elm St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM No-Build 6/23/2011 1 __ C4- ' - 4\ T �► l d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¶ 1);, 4 ¶ ft- r ) 1+ r Volume(vph) 398 77 252 0 50 22 216 436 0 14 539 311 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 0 0 0 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1649 0 0 1785 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.706 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1315 1649 0 0 1785 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 215 24 338 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 45 45 Link Distance(ft) 3432 506 3700 1290 Travel Time(s) 78.0 11.5 56.1 19.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 433 358 0 0 78 0 235 474 0 15 586 338 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split(s) 41.0 41.0 0.0 41.0 41.0 0.0 21.0 37.0 37.0 12.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split(%) 45.6% 45.6% 0.0% 45.6% 45.6% 0.0% 23.3% 41.1% 41.1% 13.3% 31.1% 31.1% Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 31.2 31.2 31.2 14.4 38.6 7.1 21.4 21.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.17 0.46 0.08 0.26 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.48 0.11 0.77 0.29 0.10 0.65 0.52 Control Delay 46.0 10.1 13.3 52.5 16.3 40.3 32.9 6.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 46.0 10.1 13.3 52.5 16.3 40.3 32.9 6.5 LOS D B B D B D C A Approach Delay 29.8 13.3 28.3 23.5 Approach LOS C B C C Queue Length 50th(ft) 348 84 30 205 131 13 254 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) #621 200 75 #378 238 44 347 104 Internal Link Dist(ft) 3352 426 3620 1210 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 565 831 781 343 1632 150 942 669 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM nobuild.syn Page 1 16: Elm St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM No-Build 6/23/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.77 0.43 0.10 0.69 0.29 0.10 0.62 0.51 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:83.7 Natural Cycle:80 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.88 Intersection Signal Delay:26.5 Intersection LOS:C Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 16:Elm St&TH 3 m1 t m2 -" ' 04 05 F m6 m8 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM nobuild.syn Page 2 4: 170th St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM No-Build 6/14/2011 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r 4+ '1 f 41- r Volume(veh/h) 62 10 143 22 10 14 104 457 14 15 847 164 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate(vph) 65 11 151 23 11 15 109 481 15 16 892 173 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) 5 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1403 1638 446 1190 1803 248 1064 496 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 923 923 707 707 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 479 715 483 1096 vCu,unblocked vol 1403 1638 446 1190 1803 248 1064 496 tC,single(s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 73 96 73 89 93 98 83 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 240 250 560 216 160 752 650 1064 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 226 48 109 321 175 313 594 173 Volume Left 65 23 109 0 0 16 0 0 Volume Right 151 15 0 0 15 0 0 173 cSH 721 252 650 1700 1700 1064 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.31 0.19 0.17 0.19 0.10 0.01 0.35 0.10 Queue Length 95th(ft) 54 28 24 0 0 2 0 0 Control Delay(s) 18.1 22.7 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C C B A Approach Delay(s) 18.1 22.7 2.1 0.2 Approach LOS C C Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington PM nobuild.syn Page 1 10: driveway & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM No-Build 6/14/2011 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 19 ?t- r' 'I f r Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 135 0 56 0 564 166 96 753 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 0 0 145 0 60 0 606 178 103 810 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1380 1801 405 1218 1623 303 810 785 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 1016 1016 606 606 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 363 785 611 1016 vCu,unblocked vol 1380 1801 405 1218 1623 303 810 785 tC,single(s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 53 100 91 100 88 cM capacity(veh/h) 206 208 595 312 244 693 812 829 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 NB 4 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 SB 4 Volume Total 0 205 0 303 303 178 103 405 405 0 Volume Left 0 145 0 0 0 0 103 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 60 0 0 0 178 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 372 1700 1700 1700 1700 829 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.12 0.24 0.24 0.00 Queue Length 95th(ft) 0 128 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A D A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 26.0 0.0 1.1 Approach LOS A D Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM nobuild.syn Page 2 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM No-Build 6/15/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 r t r ii - r Volume(vph) 48 267 211 147 235 76 94 199 80 80 286 69 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1753 0 0 1827 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.928 0.613 0.431 0.599 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1635 0 0 1142 1583 803 1863 1583 1116 1863 1583 Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 86 90 96 72 Link Speed(mph) 40 50 45 45 Link Distance(ft) 3038 5971 846 881 Travel Time(s) 51.8 81.4 12.8 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 634 0 0 460 92 113 240 96 96 345 83 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split(s) 37.0 37.0 0.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split(%) 61.7% 61.7% 0.0% 61.7% 61.7% 61.7% 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Min Act Effct Green(s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.81 0.11 0.49 0.45 0.18 0.30 0.65 0.17 Control Delay 14.8 24.6 2.4 25.1 18.9 5.3 18.5 23.2 6.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.8 24.6 2.4 25.1 18.9 5.3 18.5 23.2 6.7 LOS B C A C B A B C A Approach Delay 14.8 20.9 17.5 19.7 Approach LOS B C B B Queue Length 50th(ft) 176 159 1 44 93 0 35 143 4 Queue Length 95th(ft) 325 319 23 111 181 37 88 261 40 Internal Link Dist(ft) 2958 5891 766 801 Turn Bay Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 Base Capacity(vph) 1165 796 1130 318 738 685 442 738 670 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM nobuild.syn Page 1 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM No-Build 6/15/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.58 0.08 0.36 0.33 0.14 0.22 0.47 0.12 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:60 Actuated Cycle Length:48.5 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.1 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min)15 Splits and Phases: 17: 195th St&Akin Rd t 02 04 1 ♦- 0s 08 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM nobuild.syn Page 2 Li -. 0 InLf)Lf)Lf) d<Q Qm El ��r0rWa r`rrr m N•N • > LflLflLOIfl • LflLOU) d d'd'1 1011010In0-i0 w 1 C C C L C..0 £ ,-I+-I i--I.-I mii-+ Q ^4•-1•-i S•-i 0) Q um I 40\ E\ Q NNNN D U 3 O I-sF- a (J.\ 0000 U)U) 2U) 0 CI E 00 WO •. I-I IO 'DKD'D'O JJ 3O• ] CC 0 O\OTONON �" D WW 0 O\O'O'O\ -4 OCLI-1-11Ay r (na ' Qa 0000 • IJJWOW)-W .' LU)I-VaI--a LOLOLOM J Nr---r-q---, WDW333 *� +®► EU)EOOO 0000 Ti -sI-•+W�JJJ II - -QE-L�l�l� 0000 Lf)LflLOin m 0 0000 Z 0000 in m �,-i,-I,-I - tD .ONO'O0ff 0 LnQ00 D c0 • II 00 00L00000 N 'D000 0)01/40000 �NOO ' 0O)0100 +, �ry 1 . N00 *-I NMI" --i0000 '' x 0000000 �N,-ICON vDOhmkD*- -i 00(0000 +-0:1-NN*-•1 r.,-I -i ut00*-I0 r c00N0N0 ,-II 00 r"--,1-0000 ON0,-1 001_00000 cOm1n0 NcOU7Q,-I,-+ •o (00Q000 �N00 iL: = [1-00)0L00 (T+0,-I ,-INO0 V,, °o ,--I NNd' Oh,-IN(0 II 6 ,-IN00 0000000 X 00(0000 c in u.c.0 NNNN UJU) CCvIJ m cDONOMO 0000 > >.-i•-i ] > o ,- NNd' . . . . E E rsi ,1* 4 �� al r4 of -N�rtir�d CDcUoDcO <<D>- 11 of EEEE0EWU)wZ3 F-JJWW i c 0 m�m� 00000 ,.-I W a'-•.<< c 0 0 dWXWX • a <21-' w2O'2ON <>Qc< • M 'J>IYO..0W JF-,-IF-,-I U<Z<Z Year 2031 Full Build 5: 160th St W& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/23/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations '9 ft r' ) ft r '5 f t r' 19 ft r Volume(vph) 336 523 145 93 372 68 372 845 240 58 320 95 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 131 76 147 106 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 55 55 Link Distance(ft) 7135 4969 536 1032 Travel Time(s) 88.5 61.6 6.6 12.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 373 581 161 103 413 76 413 939 267 64 356 106 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.5 27.5 14.0 27.5 27.5 Total Split(s) 31.0 40.0 40.0 18.0 27.0 27.0 34.0 48.0 48.0 14.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split(%) 25.8% 33.3% 33.3% 15.0% 22.5% 22.5% 28.3% 40.0% 40.0% 11.7% 23.3% 23.3% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.5 7.5 5.0 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 26.0 26.1 26.1 19.9 20.0 20.0 29.0 43.1 43.1 8.4 20.2 20.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.36 0.36 0.07 0.17 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.75 0.36 0.35 0.70 0.23 0.96 0.74 0.40 0.51 0.60 0.30 Control Delay 85.8 50.0 11.7 50.2 54.1 11.4 80.7 38.4 15.2 68.3 50.6 10.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 85.8 50.0 11.7 50.2 54.1 11.4 80.7 38.4 15.2 68.3 50.6 10.4 LOS F D B D D B F D B E D B Approach Delay 56.4 47.9 45.4 44.7 Approach LOS E D D D Queue Length 50th(ft) 459 356 30 113 255 0 506 550 106 77 216 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) #774 428 115 218 347 70 #831 680 229 153 298 80 Internal Link Dist(ft) 7055 4889 456 952 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 385 976 531 294 591 328 429 1278 666 133 606 359 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spiliback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 1 5: 160th St W& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/23/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.97 0.60 0.30 0.35 0.70 0.23 0.96 0.73 0.40 0.48 0.59 0.30 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 119.7 Natural Cycle: 105 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.97 Intersection Signal Delay:48.9 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period(min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 5: 160th St W&TH 3 t01 o2 04 ■ 03 I 4\ 05 • 06 08 07 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 2 16: Elm St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/15/2011 -' C '~ 4\ t P 4 1 d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¶ 1, 4+ 'I tt r ) Tt r Volume(vph) 315 13 122 3 85 49 182 552 0 4 438 470 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 0 0 0 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1611 0 0 1770 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.677 0.995 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1261 1611 0 0 1763 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 128 35 495 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 45 45 Link Distance(ft) 3432 506 3700 1290 Travel Time(s) 78.0 11.5 56.1 19.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 332 142 0 0 144 0 192 581 0 4 461 495 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split(s) 38.0 38.0 0.0 38.0 38.0 0.0 21.0 40.0 40.0 12.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split(%) 42.2% 42.2% 0.0% 42.2% 42.2% 0.0% 23.3% 44.4% 44.4% 13.3% 34.4% 34.4% Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 24.7 24.7 24.7 12.8 37.4 7.2 21.6 21.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.17 0.49 0.09 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.23 0.24 0.64 0.33 0.02 0.46 0.62 Control Delay 40.6 5.8 15.5 42.0 14.3 37.5 26.0 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.6 5.8 15.5 42.0 14.3 37.5 26.0 6.4 LOS D A B D B D C A Approach Delay 30.2 15.5 21.2 15.9 Approach LOS C B C B Queue Length 50th(ft) 222 7 57 136 130 3 156 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) #463 68 135 275 277 20 257 120 Internal Link Dist(ft) 3352 426 3620 1210 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 553 778 793 382 1757 167 1194 862 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 6 16: Elm St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/15/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.18 0.18 0.50 0.33 0.02 0.39 0.57 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:75.9 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.81 Intersection Signal Delay:20.5 Intersection LOS:C Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 16:Elm St&TH 3 01 t 02 —11` 04 05 TIT 06 4- 08 1111 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 7 4: 170th St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/23/2011 C ~ k d Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r' 4+ +k 4+ r Volume(veh/h) 113 15 92 12 6 42 236 1443 28 27 585 38 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly flow rate(vph) 131 17 107 14 7 49 274 1678 33 31 680 44 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) 5 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 2183 3002 340 2655 3030 855 724 1710 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 743 743 2243 2243 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 1440 2259 412 787 vCu,unblocked vol 2183 3002 340 2655 3030 855 724 1710 tC,single(s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 0 14 84 50 84 84 69 91 cM capacity(veh/h) 37 20 656 28 45 301 874 367 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 256 70 274 1119 592 258 453 44 Volume Left 131 14 274 0 0 31 0 0 Volume Right 107 49 0 0 33 0 0 44 cSH 56 86 874 1700 1700 367 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 4.54 0.82 0.31 0.66 0.35 0.09 0.27 0.03 Queue Length 95th(ft) Err 169 54 0 0 11 0 0 Control Delay(s) Err 136.5 11.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F F B A Approach Delay(s) Err 136.5 1.5 1.1 Approach LOS F F Intersection Summary Average Delay 838.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 1 10: driveway & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/15/2011 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ li 44 r vi ft, r Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 172 0 125 0 819 106 46 745 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 0 0 181 0 132 0 862 112 48 784 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1444 1855 392 1351 1743 431 784 974 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 881 881 862 862 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 563 974 489 881 vCu,unblocked vol 1444 1855 392 1351 1743 431 784 974 tC,single(s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 34 100 77 100 93 cM capacity(veh/h) 218 220 607 275 255 572 830 704 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 NB 4 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 SB 4 Volume Total 0 313 0 431 431 112 48 392 392 0 Volume Left 0 181 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 132 0 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 352 1700 1700 1700 1700 704 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.07 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.00 Queue Length 95th(ft) 0 346 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.0 58.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A F B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 58.8 0.0 0.6 Approach LOS A F Intersection Summary Average Delay 8.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 2 23: Access A& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/15/2011 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 lr 11 ++ f+ rr Volume(veh/h) 143 175 92 1564 614 76 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate(vph) 159 194 102 1738 682 84 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right tum flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1756 341 767 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 682 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 1073 vCu,unblocked vol 1756 341 767 tC,single(s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 29 70 88 cM capacity(veh/h) 224 655 843 Direction,Lane# EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 159 194 102 869 869 341 341 84 Volume Left 159 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 194 0 0 0 0 0 84 cSH 224 655 843 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.71 0.30 0.12 0.51 0.51 0.20 0.20 0.05 Queue Length 95th(ft) 186 50 16 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 52.5 12.8 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F B A Approach Delay(s) 30.7 0.5 0.0 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 4.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 6 30: Access B & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/15/2011 4\ t 1 d Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¶ r ¶ 44 +f r Volume(veh/h) 57 70 37 1600 759 30 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate(vph) 63 78 41 1778 843 33 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1814 422 877 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 843 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 971 vCu,unblocked vol 1814 422 877 tC,single(s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 74 87 95 cM capacity(veh/h) 243 581 766 Direction,Lane# EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 63 78 41 889 889 422 422 33 Volume Left 63 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 33 cSH 243 581 766 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.26 0.13 0.05 0.52 0.52 0.25 0.25 0.02 Queue Length 95th(ft) 41 18 7 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 25.0 12.2 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay(s) 17.9 0.2 0.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Userslisraelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 7 20: Access C & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build * I 6/15/2011 4\ Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r 44 44 r Volume(veh/h) 66 90 46 1608 736 50 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate(vph) 73 100 51 1787 818 56 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1813 409 873 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 818 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 996 vCu,unblocked vol 1813 409 873 tC,single(s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 69 83 93 cM capacity(veh/h) 239 592 768 Direction,Lane# EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 73 100 51 893 893 409 409 56 Volume Left 73 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 56 cSH 239 592 768 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.31 0.17 0.07 0.53 0.53 0.24 0.24 0.03 Queue Length 95th(ft) 50 24 9 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 26.6 12.3 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS D B B Approach Delay(s) 18.4 0.3 0.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Userslisraelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 5 36: 190th St &Access D Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/16/2011 4- k \ . Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 'I $ 1 r ►`j r Volume(vph) 110 431 380 255 454 211 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 100 100 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1863 1863 1583 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.405 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 754 1863 1863 1583 1770 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 235 234 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 30 Link Distance(ft) 1337 1296 574 Travel Time(s) 16.6 16.1 13.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 122 479 422 283 504 234 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split(s) 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split(%) 48.3% 48.3% 48.3% 48.3% 51.7% 51.7% Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Act Effct Green(s) 17.2 17.2 17.2 17.2 18.4 18.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.40 0.40 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.69 0.61 0.39 0.72 0.30 Control Delay 18.0 19.2 17.0 4.9 19.1 3.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.0 19.2 17.0 4.9 19.1 3.0 LOS BBB A B A Approach Delay 19.0 12.1 14.0 Approach LOS B B B Queue Length 50th(ft) 38 167 141 13 172 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 116 359 307 82 370 53 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1257 1216 494 Turn Bay Length(ft) 100 100 Base Capacity(vph) 420 1037 1037 986 1067 1048 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 1 36: 190th St &Access D Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/16/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.46 0.41 0.29 0.47 0.22 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:60 Actuated Cycle Length:46.3 Natural Cycle:45 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.72 Intersection Signal Delay:14.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min)15 Splits and Phases: 36: 190th St&Access D _.M. 04 ill- 06 08 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 2 34: 195th St & Access E Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/15/2011 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations '9 * + r Volume(veh/h) 10 486 760 24 44 19 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate(vph) 11 540 844 27 49 21 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 871 1407 844 vC1,stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu,unblocked vol 871 1407 844 tC,single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC,2 stage(s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 99 68 94 cM capacity(veh/h) 774 151 363 Direction,Lane# EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 11 540 844 27 49 21 Volume Left 11 0 0 0 49 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 27 0 21 cSH 774 1700 1700 1700 151 363 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.32 0.50 0.02 0.32 0.06 Queue Length 95th(ft) 2 0 0 0 52 7 Control Delay(s) 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.8 15.5 Lane LOS A E C Approach Delay(s) 0.2 0.0 32.5 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 8 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/16/2011 s C 4- t 4\ t P \. 1 d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 r ) t- r + I Volume(vph) 18 262 108 171 425 183 120 193 132 102 172 67 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1788 0 0 1837 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.959 0.745 0.549 0.500 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1718 0 0 1388 1583 1023 1863 1583 931 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 43 121 127 72 Link Speed(mph) 40 50 45 45 Link Distance(ft) 3038 2086 846 881 Travel Time(s) 51.8 28.4 12.8 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 474 0 0 727 223 146 235 161 124 210 82 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split(s) 63.0 63.0 0.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split(%) 70.0% 70.0% 0.0% 70.0% 70.0% 70.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Min Act Effct Green(s) 42.8 42.8 42.8 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.85 0.22 0.62 0.55 0.35 0.58 0.49 0.20 Control Delay 8.0 23.1 3.6 40.9 32.1 11.1 39.9 30.8 10.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.0 23.1 3.6 40.9 32.1 11.1 39.9 30.8 10.0 LOS A C A DC BDCB Approach Delay 8.0 18.5 28.2 29.4 Approach LOS A B C C Queue Length 50th(ft) 135 358 26 95 151 20 80 133 6 Queue Length 95th(ft) 227 592 62 196 269 84 172 243 52 Internal Link Dist(ft) 2958 2006 766 801 Turn Bay Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 Base Capacity(vph) 1409 1132 1313 355 647 633 324 647 596 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 1 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 AM Full Build 6/16/2011 f c ,— 4 `\ t I' \* TITd Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.64 0.17 0.41 0.36 0.25 0.38 0.32 0.14 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:69.8 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.85 Intersection Signal Delay:20.5 Intersection LOS:C Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 17: 195th St&Akin Rd t02 —÷ 04 I, 06 4— 08 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Userslisraelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington AM fullbuild.syn Page 2 d D LnLnU)U7 comm 0'c0 0 OLnLn0U)=Z -1'.-1-~-1--1--- -NI' Or-N-or-w< I- ,--I 0N1-1 • > U)LnLnU) +-i T,�n -1,-i4 3.71-,T71-71- JLOLOLOLf Fn(DO w "j c c E 1.1„1,-1,-1,-1 ,-.4,-, a 1: -1-4-is..:, 0) a WU) I IE EE\ E ]\ LOLULOLf Z \ a r-NNNo V 3 O ►-�� a O\ 00000 cow 2(!) O OE ► 00 WO 17 I-i t0 F-Cf d C1 JJ >O D a a <NNNN '�:. WWW 0 �0%0NONCh �(�aF-'-'WY . . . Y� U)aaa 30000 iJJU)OW?•W _ • IMP-OW-a. LI)L0LfLn J NNNN uw3W333 • • ,'�� ZMX000 6666 +1-+W�•yJJJ —F-�i—CCI0000 InLfU)in D CO LF_0000 00000 in J CI LLI-111-11-11-1 0 o[ C' -1,-1 N (\.171- 0 D N • 00 00110000 N r-I`NO'NNN 0q)000 mr�@•-1 %-1, 00)0Ln0 -4.J ,N--h-100 +-I ,-I NNd• •-+0000 ON x - 0000000 °1.rcrO)N Lm iNCON -+ '06m000 +.,-,-IN,-i c0*-+cry • • tn0 ONO CO@ aJON@U)@ T+ @@ e ,--i NNd ONNN0 111 U)+-'@@N 001n006m z-00@ qpmw-Ln.-h-1 13 O)0.a600 a Nr---06 m mN � N'-,@@. f� N't �Q() ft CONDO LL 0000000 > a 000)000 — s Fn mss 1 NNNN vp) CCvv ocOONNNO D0000 ] >•-i•-4 > ? rsi ai 14 El in t 0)0)0)0) >-Q<xD11 V) EEEE'(7EW U)WZ3 I--JJWW tua ....,.....,....0%-....,......,.....0u) ,-iWW» Ocr, • a zmF=-0)F=— �aac3v a.‹.1. L 0 0 aWXWXIc dS o - <21-ll ! IONIO\ •<><X3�r m z I- 5: 160th St W& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/16/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Tf r ) ft- r vi ,ft- r ' Tf. r Volume(vph) 164 551 322 199 507 102 216 556 120 99 937 270 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 245 85 113 145 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 55 55 Link Distance(ft) 7135 4969 536 1032 Travel Time(s) 88.5 61.6 6.6 12.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 182 612 358 221 563 113 240 618 133 110 1041 300 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.0 27.0 14.0 27.5 27.5 14.0 27.5 27.5 Total Split(s) 21.0 29.0 29.0 22.0 30.0 30.0 23.0 49.0 49.0 20.0 46.0 46.0 Total Split(%) 17.5% 24.2% 24.2% 18.3% 25.0% 25.0% 19.2% 40.8% 40.8% 16.7% 38.3% 38.3% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 3.0 5.5 5.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.5 7.5 5.0 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 16.3 22.0 22.0 16.5 22.2 22.2 17.6 43.0 43.0 12.1 37.5 37.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.19 0.19 0.14 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.93 0.72 0.89 0.85 0.31 0.91 0.48 0.21 0.61 0.93 0.50 Control Delay 69.1 69.1 24.1 86.0 59.3 16.1 86.5 31.0 7.8 65.1 53.8 19.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 69.1 69.1 24.1 86.0 59.3 16.1 86.5 31.0 7.8 65.1 53.8 19.5 LOS E E C F E B F C A E D B Approach Delay 55.1 60.4 41.3 47.5 Approach LOS E E D D Queue Length 50th(ft) 221 398 129 272 356 29 296 307 16 132 651 149 Queue Length 95th(ft) #402 #580 312 #502 #488 112 #540 408 86 226 #856 287 Internal Link Dist(ft) 7055 4889 456 952 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 244 660 494 255 689 377 270 1287 648 225 1154 614 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 2 5: 160th St W& TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/16/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.93 0.72 0.87 0.82 0.30 0.89 0.48 0.21 0.49 0.90 0.49 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 118.1 Natural Cycle:95 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.93 Intersection Signal Delay:50.7 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 5: 160th St W&TH 3 01 t 02 04 C 03 05 1— 06 08 07 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 3 16: Elm St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/16/2011 J _ - ' r ~ k 4\ T t 1 d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¶ 1);, 4 1 14 r ) 44 r Volume(vph) 534 77 252 0 50 22 216 613 0 14 666 408 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 200 0 0 0 200 200 200 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 TaperLength(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1649 0 0 1786 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.708 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1319 1649 0 0 1786 0 1770 3539 1863 1770 3539 1583 Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 233 23 369 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 45 45 Link Distance(ft) 3432 506 3700 1290 Travel Time(s) 78.0 11.5 56.1 19.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 562 346 0 0 76 0 227 645 0 15 701 429 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 12.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 17.0 33.0 33.0 12.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split(%) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 18.9% 36.7% 36.7% 13.3% 31.1% 31.1% Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 39.2 39.2 39.2 12.0 36.2 7.0 21.6 21.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.13 0.41 0.08 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.41 0.10 0.95 0.45 0.11 0.82 0.65 Control Delay 57.5 7.2 11.4 88.8 21.5 40.6 41.3 10.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 57.5 7.2 11.4 88.8 21.5 40.6 41.3 10.7 LOS E A B F C D D B Approach Delay 38.3 11.4 39.0 29.8 Approach LOS D B D C Queue Length 50th(ft) 484 60 27 208 207 13 316 43 Queue Length 95th(ft) #839 155 68 #436 354 44 #432 191 Internal Link Dist(ft) 3352 426 3620 1210 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity(vph) 584 859 803 238 1435 139 872 668 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spiliback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 6 16: Elm St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/16/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.96 0.40 0.09 0.95 0.45 0.11 0.80 0.64 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:89.3 Natural Cycle:90 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.97 Intersection Signal Delay:34.6 Intersection LOS:C Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 16:Elm St&TH 3 t 01 02 '0' 04 05 06 F m8 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Userslisraelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 7 4: 170th St & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/16/2011 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 ft '9 41+ 4� Volume(veh/h) 62 10 238 36 10 14 172 817 24 15 1351 164 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly flow rate(vph) 72 12 277 42 12 16 200 950 28 17 1571 191 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) 5 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 2503 2984 785 2190 3160 489 1762 978 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 1606 1606 1364 1364 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 897 1378 826 1797 vCu,unblocked vol 2503 2984 785 2190 3160 489 1762 978 tC,single(s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 0 82 17 0 0 97 43 98 cM capacity(veh/h) 64 63 335 2 4 525 351 701 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 360 70 200 633 345 541 1047 191 Volume Left 72 42 200 0 0 17 0 0 Volume Right 277 16 0 0 28 0 0 191 cSH 229 3 351 1700 1700 701 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 1.58 22.83 0.57 0.37 0.20 0.02 0.62 0.11 Queue Length 95th(ft) 900 Err 135 0 0 3 0 0 Control Delay(s) 317.8 Err 28.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F F D A Approach Delay(s) 317.8 Err 4.8 0.2 Approach LOS F F Intersection Summary Average Delay 241.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Userslisraelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 1 10: driveway & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/16/2011 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4 ) 1t. r' '9 4i r Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 135 0 83 0 877 166 115 977 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 0 0 142 0 87 0 923 175 121 1028 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1819 2368 514 1679 2194 462 1028 1098 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 1271 1271 923 923 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 549 1098 756 1271 vCu,unblocked vol 1819 2368 514 1679 2194 462 1028 1098 tC,single(s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 32 100 84 100 81 cM capacity(veh/h) 128 124 505 208 165 547 671 631 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 NB 4 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 SB 4 Volume Total 0 229 0 462 462 175 121 514 514 0 Volume Left 0 142 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 87 0 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 272 1700 1700 1700 1700 631 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.19 0.30 0.30 0.00 Queue Length 95th(ft) 0 279 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.0 62.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A F B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 62.1 0.0 1.3 Approach LOS A F Intersection Summary Average Delay 6.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 1 20: Access C & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/23/2011 I' 4\ t l 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►`j r '1 ft +} r Volume(veh/h) 76 124 107 1083 1487 135 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate(vph) 84 138 119 1203 1652 150 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 2492 826 1802 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 1652 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 839 vCu,unblocked vol 2492 826 1802 tC,single(s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 29 56 65 cM capacity(veh/h) 119 315 338 Direction,Lane# EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 84 138 119 602 602 826 826 150 Volume Left 84 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 150 cSH 119 315 338 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.71 0.44 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.49 0.49 0.09 Queue Length 95th(ft) 156 85 62 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 88.7 25.0 21.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F D C Approach Delay(s) 49.2 1.9 0.0 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary Average Delay 4.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 4 23: Access A & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/23/2011 f 4\ t 4 d Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) r" 15 4iii 4.4,- r Volume(veh/h) 110 134 187 904 1465 153 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate(vph) 122 149 208 1004 1628 170 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 2546 814 1798 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 1628 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 918 vCu,unblocked vol 2546 814 1798 tC,single(s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 0 54 39 cM capacity(veh/h) 94 321 339 Direction,Lane# EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 122 149 208 502 502 814 814 170 Volume Left 122 0 208 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 170 cSH 94 321 339 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 1.30 0.46 0.61 0.30 0.30 0.48 0.48 0.10 Queue Length 95th(ft) 350 94 154 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 274.0 25.5 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F D D Approach Delay(s) 137.6 5.3 0.0 Approach LOS F Intersection Summary Average Delay 13.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Userslisraelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 5 30: Access B & TH 3 Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/23/2011 f 'i 4\ t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 5 r 15 fT tt r Volume(veh/h) 44 54 75 1048 1538 61 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate(vph) 49 60 83 1164 1709 68 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 2458 854 1777 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 1709 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 749 vCu,unblocked vol 2458 854 1777 tC,single(s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 59 80 76 cM capacity(veh/h) 119 302 346 Direction,Lane# EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 49 60 83 582 582 854 854 68 Volume Left 49 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 68 cSH 119 302 346 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.41 0.20 0.24 0.34 0.34 0.50 0.50 0.04 Queue Length 95th(ft) 70 29 37 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 55.2 19.9 18.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F C C Approach Delay(s) 35.7 1.2 0.0 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 6 34: 195th St & Access E Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/23/2011 4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►`j 4' r r Volume(veh/h) 20 815 735 48 34 15 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate(vph) 22 906 817 53 38 17 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX,platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 870 1767 817 vC1,stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu,unblocked vol 870 1767 817 tC,single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC,2 stage(s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 97 58 96 cM capacity(veh/h) 775 89 377 Direction,Lane# EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 22 906 817 53 38 17 Volume Left 22 0 0 0 38 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 53 0 17 cSH 775 1700 1700 1700 89 377 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.53 0.48 0.03 0.42 0.04 Queue Length 95th(ft) 4 0 0 0 69 6 Control Delay(s) 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.0 15.0 Lane LOS A F C Approach Delay(s) 0.2 0.0 54.5 Approach LOS F Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 7 36: 190th St & Access D Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/16/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ' + T r Volume(vph) 236 493 439 551 371 216 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 100 100 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1863 1863 1583 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.387 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 721 1863 1863 1583 1770 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 527 240 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 30 Link Distance(ft) 1337 1296 574 Travel Time(s) 16.6 16.1 13.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 262 548 488 612 412 240 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split(s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split(%) 58.3% 58.3% 58.3% 58.3% 41.7% 41.7% Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Act Effct Green(s) 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 15.9 15.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.64 0.57 0.60 0.72 0.36 Control Delay 31.8 14.3 12.9 4.7 24.9 4.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 31.8 14.3 12.9 4.7 24.9 4.2 LOS CBB AC A Approach Delay 20.0 8.3 17.3 Approach LOS B A B Queue Length 50th(ft) 101 191 162 22 187 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) #300 344 294 101 #360 64 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1257 1216 494 Turn Bay Length(ft) 100 100 Base Capacity(vph) 470 1214 1214 1215 770 824 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 14 36: 190th St & Access D Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/16/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.45 0.40 0.50 0.54 0.29 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:60 Actuated Cycle Length:49.4 Natural Cycle:50 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.79 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 36: 190th St&Access D —II" 04 F 06 08 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:1Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington12035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 15 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/16/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4 r 'i t- r li t- r' Volume(vph) 48 472 211 196 381 173 94 199 148 216 286 69 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1785 0 0 1831 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.869 0.513 0.302 0.474 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1556 0 0 956 1583 563 1863 1583 883 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 43 111 141 46 Link Speed(mph) 40 50 45 45 Link Distance(ft) 3038 2086 846 881 Travel Time(s) 51.8 28.4 12.8 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 892 0 0 704 211 115 243 180 263 349 84 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split(s) 61.0 61.0 0.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split(%) 67.8% 67.8% 0.0% 67.8% 67.8% 67.8% 32.2% 32.2% 32.2% 32.2% 32.2% 32.2% Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Min Act Effct Green(s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.91 1.18 0.21 0.77 0.49 0.34 1.12 0.70 0.18 Control Delay 29.1 119.4 4.0 64.5 31.8 9.7 128.3 38.6 14.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 29.1 119.4 4.0 64.5 31.8 9.7 128.3 38.6 14.6 LOS C F A EC A F DB Approach Delay 29.1 92.8 31.4 69.6 Approach LOS C F C E Queue Length 50th(ft) 613 -777 33 96 186 27 -278 286 26 Queue Length 95th(ft) #800 #969 66 #212 270 87 #452 390 72 Internal Link Dist(ft) 2958 2006 766 801 Turn Bay Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 100 Base Capacity(vph) 984 595 1027 150 497 526 235 497 456 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 8 17: 195th St & Akin Rd Seed/Genstar AUAR 2035 PM Full Build 6/16/2011 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.91 1.18 0.21 0.77 0.49 0.34 1.12 0.70 0.18 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:90 Natural Cycle:65 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.18 Intersection Signal Delay:57.9 Intersection LOS:E Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period(min) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 17: 195th St&Akin Rd t02 —♦ 04 I 06 4— 08 Bonestroo Synchro 7- Report C:\Users\israelsons\Documents\Synchro Files\Farmington\2035 Farmington PM fullbuild.syn Page 9 El ID LOLDLOLO (LLLL c0,-1 El O T NNwa1-4-Nr-- -r� o)Q0co ON U)L011) V-V-V-� CO 1-1 3 Oei JLnU)U)U) uflDL9 CAR. C C C L CC E 11,1 1-11-h-1,-1 HH a .-4•..i.•.i S ^ • i Gla U)U) I E E E\ E >\ LOLOLOLO Z OF N. a NNNr� 2 0 4-.1 JO . Hf- C a U\ 00000 U)U) 2U) L 0 0_E - 1- 00 WO a ►-I t0 ' k01/40t0',0 - JJ 709 DWW 0 I c�O\O O O •-+C.) ii•-�WY I . . . . Y1-4 U)aaa 0000 C i JU)OW)-W 0 1U)JC)af-a 1-4--1-4-- U 11WDW333 ell EU)Z000 0000 •-it-IW1-4JJJ -t•-CCI-LLLLLL 0000 LO LO LO LO In 0000 RI 0000 •+•i Lnco,-h-i D 11 V •- • 00 •c ()0.000 N Om@0,�,-i 1 NNVt• -0000 3 � N00 x 1.-- 0000000 0000000 NNLON ? k01�1•V71•0 0 0 0)0 0 0 .,•.s V'ON,-,-I k0,-1 c0 ON 0 V0 t,QV-mm . COr- •,-+,-1 00191 O U)Q '— NN V• t�d•r-+m ,-IN 10,-1 00L00000 O\0'00 ,-00)ONV•Ln 0)0w000 (N.J,-I,-1r+ m d'00)01 )0 I-- 1 �N00 • ,-•i NN V' v)V-N m = 2.00)00 LL W 0000000 X 000)000 s u► tnts-P NNNN OJ01CC bQ) 0 mC0o O1`NNNO 0000 > >• > > L N i (1 r-1 ri rl - •-i ++ 1.2f-17-11-1 i cu 01 -s��- -spa U. c c0c1 >-¢aDD Vf E E E E-0 EW U)WZ3 i-JJWW „......0,...,,,-0%-,,,-00) i-iWW1M W • ` � � Qooc0c � a mm in C)'aa o 0 0 aWXWX • of 0 -• <21-112Clt!20'20\ a7a>a 0 mcec' ''WJ7a0_0(.9 1-,-11---‘-1 ()<E<Z E t.I I- RESOLUTION NO. R14-17 APPROVING THE 2016 SEED/GENSTAR AUAR AND MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said city on the 21st day of February, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Bartholomay, Craig, Donnelly, Pitcher Members Absent: Larson Member Craig introduced and Member Donnelly seconded the following: Whereas,there exists 960 acres of land in northeast Farmington,west of Trunk Highway 3 and bisected by North Creek, and; Whereas, in 2005 the city of Farmington adopted an AUAR for this area as form of environmental review in compliance with Minnesota Rules 4410, and that review is required to be updated every five years. The last update to the AUAR was completed in 2011, and; Whereas, as the Responsible Governmental Unit,the city of Farmington has completed an update to its 2011 AUAR to identify the potential environmental impacts of development that is consistent with the city of Farmington's current comprehensive plan, and mitigation for identified impacts, in accordance with Minnesota Rule 441.3600, including distribution of a Draft AUAR Update for agency comment, and a revised environmental analysis and mitigation plan in response to those comments, and; Whereas, objections to the Draft AUAR Update were neither filed with the city nor the EQB within the objection period defined in Minnesota Rule 441.3610 Sub 5(D); NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Farmington City Council hereby approves the Seed/Genstar AUAR and Mitigation Plan Update consistent with the intents and purposes of the Rules of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board under the provisions for Alternative Urban Areawide Review(AUAR). The following conditions shall govern this review: 1. The specific boundaries of the Seed/Genstar Area for review under the AUAR are depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21st day of February, 2017. 41111-) 11 Jason :artholomay, Acti e Mayor Attest to they 61 day of February,2017. Adam Kienberge;, Acting City Ai' ' 'stator SEAL 1 - J ; \ i >c • \/ \.• \,r ,\ '\. /'" :\ j/\ r 1 n. >(‘'' , X /\ X ;,., `j 3 Y. \ • -\,�\'Y\ `. ,, 'c`\.i\ �✓•. r `, " \/ \..., ..e._" / , \",`" \X' l;• \>:17-\y/ •t- j\x)\ ♦ / / \ "\\ /�\ \/ \ I i\ ., ,•S .\ / '\ /\ li/ \ ••• • \I V '''' \ ,X i ,•:<‘• /\ :\ \ /\ 7\ /\ , \\,/` '\ / / ,y / y \\ ., \f ;` , - ,X •. N. ` \rte \ "\ .'(• ▪\\� '.•/\\,./\J\\ \r,-.\. \\,/ \/ / \ / ', .\/ V' III \/ - •,-.9 ▪ \ • `\ �\•' \. • y, \ G J 1p4 "; f: \� , Q \/ Q- _ • \\ 1� Z1s Il 11 ]� ?� L1.1 I ' r 1\ \ r ,1, ' ‘ \ 11 111 I , 1 ', \. \. \\♦/ r lilt \• X'<'' - ---'''' .611 (ill_ :: \ /\/> •-'X. i1 11 -1 til 111 _ ?L1JI\y Ly `' \ [ �= i Ilik, QHOQO!!..! _=`t City of Farmington 0 R-1,Low Density Residential [-1100-Year Floodplain 0 Stantec ,�x Seed-Genstar 0 R-2,Low/Medium Density Residential N Study Area Boundary AUAR-Update 0 R-3,Medium Density Residential 'ja4 City Boundary I iMi Mixed Use(Commerdal/Residential) A{Railroad Feet ' '� Existing Zoning ®P/os,Parklopen space N Parcel Base Map ®Planned Unit Development(PUD) i l Figure 5-3 November 2016 1,200 0 1,200 V:119361active11938037471GIS\ProJects'Fig 5-3 Zaning.mxd oIM, , City of Farmington 430 Third Street / Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 -41'.4intoo.6 www.cifannington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councflmembers and City Administrator FROM: Tony Wippler,Planning Manager SUBJECT: Application to Amend Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to Commercial and Rezone Property from R-1 (Low Density Residential)to B-4 (Neighborhood Business)-Mr. Craig Bongard-20522 Akin Road DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION Mr. Craig Bongard has submitted an application to amend the city's 2030 Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to Commercial and rezone property from R-1 (Low Density Residential)to B-4 (Neighborhood Business). The subject property is 20522 Akin Road. DISCUSSION Planning Division Review Site Address: 20522 Akin Road Property Owner/Applicant: Craig Bongard Attachments: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application • Rezoning Application • Rezoning Ordinance • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution Lot Size: 4.79 acres Existing Zoning: R-1 (Low Density Residential) 2030 Comprehensive Plan Guidance: Low Density Residential Surrounding Land Uses: Single-family residences are located to the north and west of the subject property. Farmington Lutheran Church is located to the south and farmland is adjacent to the east. background/Review On August 10, 1976 the city's Planning Commission granted a special exception permit for the property located at 20522 Akin Road to allow Equipment Maintenance& Storage,Non-commercial on this site. The definition for Equipment Maintenance& Storage,Non-commercial was established by ordinance No. 076-39 and reads as follows: "Equipment Maintenance&Storage,Non-commercial: A building in which is exclusively maintained, repaired or stored, only equipment which is owned and used by the same individual, fin, or organization that owns,rents, leases or occupies the building and in which no maintenance, repair or storage of equipment is performed for any other party or person. " A special exception permit is similar to what a conditional use permit is in today's zoning code and allows for certain uses of property after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Special exception permits, like conditional use permits,run with the land. Special exceptions no longer exist in the city's zoning ordinance as uses and therefore cannot be amended. The subject property has been used in the recent past for Mr.Bongard's trucking operation in accordance with the aforementioned special exception permit. Comprehensive Plan &Zoning Amendment Request Mr. Bongard is requesting an amendment to the city's 2030 Comprehensive Plan as well as a rezoning of the property located at 20522 Akin Road. The request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan guidance for this property from R-1 (Low Density Residential)to Commercial and to rezone the property from R-1 (Low Density Residential)to B-4(Neighborhood Business). It is Mr. Bongard's belief that a B-4 zoning for the property would afford him the opportunity to sell the property as many of the inquiries for the property are for uses that can be found in the B-4 zoning classification. As the city council is aware,Mr. Bongard applied for a Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning for this same property in 2016 to a commercial designation and B-3 (Heavy Business),respectively. These applications were denied by the city council due in large part because the request did not fit into the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The B-3 zone is a high intensity commercial zoning district and the uses within that district generally are incompatible with other commercial zones such as the B-4. The purpose statement for the B-4 zone is as follows: "The B-4 neighborhood business district is intended to provide a setting for low to medium density housing combined with complementary and supporting business land uses that serve a neighborhood and are developed and operated in harmony with the residential characteristics of a neighborhood." The permitted and conditional uses currently allowed under the B-4 zoning district are as follows: Permitted • Dental laboratories • Neighborhood services • Nonprofit recreational, cultural entertainment uses • Offices • Personal and professional services, less than 3,000 square feet • Personal health and beauty services, less than 3,000 square feet Conditional • Animal clinics • Child daycare facilities, commercial • Churches • Clinics • Data Centers • Dwellings, multi-family • Funeral homes • Health clubs • Light manufacturing facilities • Ministorage units • Personal and professional services,greater than 3,000 square feet • Personal health and beauty services, greater than 3,000 square feet • Public and parochial schools • Public utility buildings • Recreational vehicle storage facilities It is important to note that a change in the zoning of this property to a B-4 classification would entitle this property to any of the aforementioned uses in the future. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission met on February 14, 2017 and held a public hearing regarding these applications. After taking public comment, the Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the requested comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning. It was the commission's opinion that the uses allowed in the B-4 zone are of an intensity that is compatible with the uses surrounding this property,which are largely residential This point is broadened by the purpose statement for the B-4 zone that states the district is intended to allow complementary and supporting business land uses that serve a residential neighborhood. BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED 1. Approve the attached resolution granting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Commercial for the property addressed as 20522 Akin Road. 2. Adopt the attached ordinance rezoning the property addressed as 20522 Akin Road from R-1 (Low Density Residential)to B-4(Neighborhood Business). ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application D Backup Material Rezoning Application D Ordinance Rezoning Ordinance D Resolution Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution e City of Farmington f\o 430 Third Street pq Farmington,Minnesota JAN 6 Y �� s � 651.280.680D•Fax 651,280.6899 www.aitarmtngtonne.us PETITION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Applicant: CCI b 6;1'C,1 Cif �E Telephone:( Fax ( ) y Address: 9<3 2 - CLx l 1>t R.,cl) 1-c. —�}",/ {t.t r, . �� C�D'`-t• Street City State Zip Code Owner: C r CL►C I I� ' c:: �� Telephone: t4 0/�) C 4 F Mailing Address: ��Cl �"3 F!L•.i,i-C•sctu2 FL Street / City �! State ' Zip Code Premises Involved: c--)f3--)f3 •D- t_ t:1 r'> }?c.d J '}��'r + 1 Kt n C. ..C.51.1.09-4 Address/Legal Description(lot,block,plat name,secon,township,range) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation: { U L\.l Ct r�t+\J rt`' Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation: ( CI'�r�r ti V tst G I understand that a• blit•eating is required well as a published notice of hearing,for which I hereby attach payment of the fee in the amo it of$ J , which I and d further will be refunded if no meeting is scheduled. 'Signature o?Owner r'• Date f For office use only Request Submitted to Planning staff on Public Hearing Set for: Advertised in Local Newspaper: Planning Commission Action: Approved Denied City Council Action(if necessary): Approved Denied Comments: Conditions Set: Planning division: Date: 9/06 In accordance with Title 10,Chapter 3,Section 12 of the City Code. • City of Farmington ,-,i-41111k. 410Third snees ��FuSAN 1 2 2017 PETITION FOR REZONING APPLICATION Applicant: C:' \c ��n(^}�t l� jj Telephone:( ) Fax: �) , r Address: O ? )- ,' J..1 it} Z_LA 6"c t- r- , Ai , 4..�5J' Cd4 Street City J State / c,� Zip Code Owner: CGI - >n cia rd - Telephone:4/J f..f O gax: ( ) Mailing Address: Ui • •c 'a•---j .P i 0 0+CL 0•'-) pct. VJ l n.\- --�v e_r—, 3 ygq Stteet-. City �-; State `" ZipCode Premises Involved(''20�� -.#r-1 h=-C{ ---''b,'-y \\1 fT 55 co-L-1. Address/Legal Description(lot,block,plat name,seeth n,township,range) Current Zoning R- t Proposed Zoning 1�— I understand that lic hearing is required as well as a published notice of hearing,for which I hereby attach payment ee in the amount of$ ,which I understand further will be refunded if no m 4' g is schedul . • Signa e f Owner Date • For office use only Request Submitted to Planning staff on Public Hearing Set for: Advertised in Local Newspaper: Planning Commission Action: Approved Denied City Council Action(if necessary): Approved Denied Comments: • Conditions Set: Planning division: Date: 9/06 In accordance with Title 10,Chapter 3,Section 12 of the City Code. CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance Amending Title 10 of the Farmington City Code,the Farmington Zoning Ordinance,rezoning the property known as the Bongard property (20522 Akin Road) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 10-5-1 of the Farmington City Code is amended by rezoning the property legally described on the attached Exhibit A, depicted in Exhibit B and addressed as 20522 Akin Road from R-1 (Low Density Residential)to B-4(Neighborhood Business). SECTION 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Farmington,adopted under Section 10-5- 1 of the Farmington City Code,shall be republished to show the aforesaid zoning. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage. Adopted this_day of ,2017,by the City Council of the City of Farmington. SEAL CITY OF FARMINGTON MAYOR ATTEST: CITY ADMINISTRATOR Approved as to form the_day of ,2017. CITY ATTORNEY Published in the Farmington Independent the_day of ,2017. • • Exhibit "A": Legal Description of The Property(a.P)S?d 4%04 ( eM ) That part of the Northeast Quarter (167./4) of Section Twenty-Five (25), Township One-Hundred Fourteen (114), Range Twenty (20), described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the North line of said Northeast Quarter (1&11/4) with the centerline of C.S.A.E. No. 311s-thence Southeasterly, along said centerline, a distance of 230.55 feet, along a non-tangential curve, concave to the West, having a radius of 5729.74 feet; thence South 17 degrees 21 minutes 05 seconds East, assumed bearing, tangent to said curve, a distance of 1506.67 flet; thence Southeasterly, along said centerline, along a tangential curve, concave to the East, having a radius of 2864.85 feet, a central angel of 5 degree's 56 minutes 07 seconds a distance of 296.77 feet) thence continue Southeasterly along said curve, concave to the East, having a radius of 2864.85 feet, a central angle of 5 degrees 56 minutes 23 seconds, a distance of 297.00 feet; thence continue Southeasterly along said curve, concave to the East, having a radius of 2864.85 feet, a central angle of-4 degrees 48 minutes 36 seconds,a distance of 240.49 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence Southeasterly along said curve, concave to the ' East, having a radius of 2864.85 feet, a central angle of 0 degrees 26 minutes 24 seconds, a distance of 22.00 feet; thence South 34 degrees 28 minutes 35 seconds East, tangent to the last described curve, along said centerline, a distance of 217.35 feet to the South line of said Northeast Quarter (NE1/4); thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 31 seconds East, along the South line of said Northeast Quarter (NE1/4)a distance of 522.66 feet-to a point, distane 514.00 feet Westerly of the Southeast corner of said Northeast-Quarter (NE1/4); thence NorthO degrees 40 minutes 29 seconds East;.---a distance of 478.00 feet; thence-South 67 degrees 31 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 718.18 feet to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Dakota .County, Minnesota. Ix& r4' B Dakota County, MN *4 �� ,. It .T I ~1 tc 11r- IFur rt .4,`' .i' . " 4 .'1 /� fid+ ).• r. kir : \ _ - < , ,` r�u' t r ? t jj '��t � sit" �. `a� -., , . , l• ,-T."' #2,:,,, .,.: ';';;:.',..r,:::,., .• vi:;,, , k ,,•1.• • ,1,,,,,,,: \\, ,,. .. .. aiks,, 'E-4, ,,t, :=, t. .'i i1 e-•# r i , , f• ''*2... ... -. -,' ;".',.':.•-•,••;••:•''',/,,,, -- -,--7,...i.-.. it February 9, 2017 1:4,800 0 225 450 900 ft I ? ' t t I r 0 65 130 260 m Property Information Dakota County ,claimer:Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate,but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal,survey,or for zoning verification. RESOLUTION NO. AMENDING THE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE BONGARD PROPERTY LOCATED AT 20522 AKIN ROAD Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington,Minnesota,was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21' day of February,2017 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, Mr. Craig Bongard petitioned for a Comprehensive Land Use amendment for the property located at 20522 Akin Road, and depicted in the attached Exhibit A, and that said request proposes that the land use designation be changed from Low Density Residential to Commercial;and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 14th day of February, 2017 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and proper notice sent to surrounding property owners;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission accepted public comments at the public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Bongard property, located at 20522 Akin Road, said amendment changing the land use designation from Low Density Residential to Commercial. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Farmington hereby amends the 2030 Comprehensive Plan for the Bongard property, located at 20522 Akin Road from Low Density Residential to Commercial. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21'day of February,2017 Mayor Attested to the day of February,2017. City Administrator SEAL f,.r KL^^ao- A Dakota County, MN is b + j ,1 • s+ "1'� sf, .,:PI .rte ,r. 4 _ Y��` _ --^ .. Vit, , x . ':1 ?v r , p• N —--%r7 ' ''' % , i'T 4. 4, A v . Int' , 4 Cvt s.,,. 4 .,d '+ ` , �Ntr v ,....,/ , :1) 4-' 'SI4 -:::ir*, , . : V ,4. seilk 1. - i ... :I..'' , I •W ►r 4 • r '•4 l\\v' - f 4.:( V):.. _� 'J' , Ip �r1 e , 4 ItA\ .v -•r A ..'' r\,: 'r4 fir 1•: 7.27: . .2 •. . 4' ' ta' '' .4:- . , . . v n,', ,, i , , .'4, ' 44..:1'.„.:".5,, . 1,cr,... , , tf ''>''':n ,. ) jiff. ' '-...-' iti f'• + r n- z. •r is nk` 1 ft, r, !„g .�, .t, • `\ s }� t � � �,� 4z.;) I ./`' arm s a� n. , ” cH 4i,t; i iiit.,...; ,fr::'‹ �i << , (� .^I�- February 9, 2017 1:4,800 0 225 450 900 ft I r r .' I I o 65 130 260 m Property Information Dakota County mlaimer.Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate,but accuracy is not guaranteed. This Is not a legal document and should not be substituted fora title search,appraisal,survey,or for zoning verification. 4,E104 City of �Farmingtonm 4Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 '4j•.•AMI". www ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councihnembers and City Administrator FROM: Jennifer Dullum,Natural Resource Specialist SUBJECT: Wetland Health Evaluation Program Joint Powers Agreement DATE: February 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION Since 1998, the city of Farmington has participated in the Wetland Health Evaluation Program (WHEP). WHEP is coordinated through a partnership between participating cities, Dakota County, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA)and a consultant. Each year a team of citizen volunteers evaluates wetlands selected by Farmington. Wetlands are evaluated for macroinvertebrates and plants. The wetland's health is determined and an annual report depicting the results for each wetland studied is published and distributed to each participating city, MPCA and volunteers. DISCUSSION Several wetlands in Farmington have been evaluated since joining WHEP. The city has both a long-term monitoring site and newer sites whose data can be evaluated for project specific decisions. Data is also used for general assessments, trend analysis, effects of wetland management and to compare development impacts on local water resources. Another major benefit of WHEP is its environmental education and civic engagement. Volunteers become local experts in wetland health. Participants in WHEP develop a stronger sense of belonging in their community. WHEP fosters attitudes and behaviors that value wetlands, and increase the public's knowledge when volunteers teach their friends and neighbors to protect wetland resources. By approving this joint powers agreement between the city of Farmington and Dakota County,we are continuing this beneficial program and maintaining our working relationship with the County. WHEP is managed and administered by Dakota County. BUDGET IMPACT The city of Farmington currently monitors three wetlands. The annual fee averages $3,000. The funds are budgeted annually in the Storm Water Utility account for this program. ACTION REQUESTED Authorize execution of the attached joint powers agreement for the Wetland Health Evaluation Program from 2017 through 2021. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description © Backup Material WHEP JPA resolution O Backup Material Joint Powers Agreement RESOLUTION NO. R15-17 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WETLAND HEALTH EVALUATION PROGRAM Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21st day of February 2017 at 7:00 p.m. Members present: Bartholomay, Craig, Donnelly, Pitcher Members absent: Larson Member Craig introduced and Member Bartholomay seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 21st day of February authorized the city to enter into the 2017 through 2021 Wetland Health Evaluation Program as part of the Joint Powers Agreement administered by Dakota County; and, WHEREAS, said Joint Powers Agreement will be submitted to Dakota County. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of Farmington, Minnesota, 1. That the Wetland Health Evaluation Program will be performed as part of the Joint Powers Agreement administered by Dakota County. 2. The Mayor and the City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute the Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21st day of February 2017. 410"1,11.11:14 Jaso' Bartholomay, Acting Mayor Attested to the a?46 day of February, 2017. s` 1-/ "Li VCi Administrator SEAL 4 Dakota County Contract C0028722 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN DAKOTA COUNTY AND THE CITY OF FARMINGTON FOR THE WETLAND HEALTH EVALUATION PROGRAM The parties to this Agreement are the County of Dakota,a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota(County) and the City of FARMINGTON(City),a governmental and political subdiviston of the State of Minnesota.This Agreement is made pursuant to the authority conferred upon the parties by Minn.Stat.§471.59. NOW,THEREFORE,In consideration of the mutual promises and benefits:that the County and the City shall derive from this Agreement,the County and the City hereby enter into this Agreement for the purposes stated herein. SECTION 1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement Is to facilitate the analysis of wetlands located with the City through the Dakota County Wetland Health Evaluation Program(WHEP),which Is coordinated and managed by the County,to obtain data and other information to assist both parties in performing their responsibilities under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. SECTION 2 • TERM Notwithstanding the date of the signatures of the parties,the term of this Agreement shall commence on January 1,2017, and shall continue In full force and effect until December 31,2021,unless earlier terminated by law or according to the provisions of this Agreement- SECTiON 3 COOPERATION The parties agree to cooperate and use their reasonable efforts to ensure prompt implementation of the various provisions of this Agreement and to,in good faith,undertake resolution of any dispute in en equitable and timely manner. SECTION 4 EXERCISE OF POWERS The parties to this Agreement agree that the County shall administer the funds collected hereunder and disburse these funds for expenses Incurred by WHEP. SECTION 5 • POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COUNTY 5.1 The County shag administer the WHEP funds on behalf of the City. 5.2 The County shall serve as fiscal agent for the funds collected hereunder. The County shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as may be required by generally accepted accounting practices. 5.3 The County may apply for and accept gifts,grants,loans and money,other property or assistance from federal or state agencies,or any other person to carry out the WHEP In Dakota County. 5.4 The County may use funds to hire and retain a monitoring coordinator,a non-profit agency,consulting firms and such other personnel as may be needed to provide the services contemplated under this Agreement Notwithstanding the foregoing,the parties agree that WHEP is a volunteer based program and that data collection shall be performed solely by volunteers trained by the County.All volunteers participating in the WHEP shall be considered agents of the County and not agents of the City. • SECTION 6 FUNDING On or before March 31 each year of the term of this Agreement,the County shall provide to the City a complete WHEP fee schedule for that calendar year,Including an itemization of the fee for analyzing each wetland and the fee for performing a quality assurance recheck to enable the City to evaluate whether to participate in the WHEP for that year. If the City elects to participate in the WHEP for that year,the City shall notify the County and the County shall provide the services described herein. On or about July 1 of each year that the City elects to participate,the County shall submit an invoice to the City for the WHEP fees for that year and the City shall remit payment to the County within 30 days after receipt of such invoice. SECTION 7 WHEP TIMEUNE The parties agree to the following timeline for each year of the term of this Agreement Spring The County shall provide a WHEP fee schedule to the City and the City shall notify the County if the City elects to participate in the WHEP for that calendar year and identify the specific wetlands to be analyzed. Late Spring and Summer Trained volunteers shall collect data regarding the quantity and variety of plants and macrolnvertebrates within each City designated wetland, making note of any invasive species sighted. A consultant hired by the County shall conduct a quality assurance recheck based on monitoring protocols. Fall The consultant hired by the County shall compile and analyze the data collected for all wetlands within the City under the WHEP and prepare a written report on the same. Winter The County shall deliver to the City the consultant's written report and the data collected for all wetlands analyzed within the.City. SECTION 8 INDEMNIFICATION • Each party to this Agreement shall be liable for the acts of its officers,employees or agents and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party,its officers,employees or agents. The provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act,Minn.Stat ch.466 and other applicable laws govern liability of the County and the City. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement SECTION 9 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES AND LIAISONS 9.1 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. The following named persons are designated the Authorized Representatives of the parties for purposes of this Agreement These persons have authority to bind the party . they represent and to consent to modifications,except that the authorized representative shall have only the authority specifically or generally granted by their respective governing boards. Notice required to be provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided to the following named persons and addresses unless otherwise stated in this Agreement,or in a modification of this Agreement TO THE COUNTY: Georg Fischer or successor,Director Environmental Resources Department • 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley,MN 55124 2 • , • TO THE CITY: Todd Larson or successor,Mayor City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington,MN 65024 In addition, notification to the County regarding termination of this Agreement by the other party shall be provided • to the Office of the Dakota County Attorney,Civil Division,1560 Highway 55,Hastings,Minnesota 55033. 9.2 LIAISONS. To assist the parties In the day-to-day performance of this Agreement and to ensure compliance and provide ongoing consultation, a liaison shall be designated by the County and the City. The parties shall keep each other continually informed, In writing, of any change in the designated liaison. At the time of execution of this Agreement,the following persons are the designated liaisons: County Liaison City Llalsop Paula LiepoId Jen Dullum,or successor Telephone:(952)891-7117 Telephone:651-280-6845 Email:paulalIepold@co.dakotamn.us Email: jdullultn(gki.farmIngton.mn.us SECTION 10 TERMINATION Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time upon 90 days written notice to the other party. SECTION 11 • GENERAL PROVISIONS 11.1 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS/STANDARDS. The City and the County agree to abide by all federal,state or local laws,statutes,ordinances,rules and regulations now In effect or hereafter adopted pertaining to this Agreement or to the facilities,programs and staff for which either party Is responsible. 11.2 EXCUSED DEFAULT—FORCE MAJEURE. Neither party shall be liable to the other party for any loss or damage resulting from a delay or failure to perform due to unforeseeable acts or events outside the defaulting party's reasonable control,providing the defaulting party gives notice to the other party as soon as possible. Acts and events may include acts of God,acts of terrorism,war,fire,flood,epidemic,acts of civil or military authority, and natural disasters. • 11.3 CONTRACT RIGHTS CUMULATIVE NOT EXCLUSIVE. • A. Ail remedies available to either party for breach of this Agreement are cumulative and may be exercised concurrently or separately,and the exercise of any one remedy shall not be deemed an election of such remedy to the exclusion of other remedies. The rights and remedies provided in this Agreement are not exclusive and are In addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. B. Waiver for any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver of breach of •any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed to be modification for the terms of this Agreement unless stated to be such In writing and signed by authorized representatives of the County and the City. 11.4 RECORDS RETENTION AND AUDITS. Each party's bonds,records,documents,papers,accounting procedures and practices,and other records relevant to this Agreement are subject to the examination, duplication,transcription and audit by the other party,the Legislative Auditor or State Auditor under Minn.Stat.§ 160.05,subd.5. If any funds provided under this Agreement use federal funds these records are also subject to review by the Comptroller General of the United States and his or her approved representative. Following • termination of this Agreement,the parties must keep these records for at least six years or longer If any audit-in- progress udit in- progress needs a longer retention time. 3 11.5 MODIFICATIONS. Any alterations,variations,modifications,or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing and signed by the authorized representatives of the County and the City. 11.0 ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign any of its rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. Said consent may be subject to conditions. 11.7 GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES. For purposes of this Agreement,all data on individuals collected,created, received,maintained or disseminated shall be administered consistent with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,Minn.Stat,ch.93. 11.8 MINNESOTA LAW TO GOVERN. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed In accordance with the substantive and procedural laws of the State of Minnesota,without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws. Ni proceedings related to this Agreement shall be venued in Dakota County,Minnesota The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 11.9 MERGER. This Agreement Is the final expression of the agreement of the parties and the complete and exclusive statement of the terms agreed upon and shall supersede all prior negotiations,understandings,or agreements. 11.10 SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable. If any part of this Agreement is rendered void, Invalid, or unenforceable, such rendering shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement unless the part or parts that are void, Invalid or otherwise unenforceable shall substantially'Impair the value of the entire Agreement with respect to either paity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date(s)indicated below. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAKOTA C 1 /e/Helen R.Brosnahan Auaust 11.2018 By i - -Ad& Assistant County Attorney/Date C: ' 'cher or successor,Director KS-18-243-003 E vironmental Resources De nt County Board Res.No.16- ■ate of Signature: yze /7 CITY OF FARMINGTON Date of gnature: t, i .4 h,1 1.7 br • By ,Are' vie/1`!e%ni 7f ,City Clerk Date of Signature: /p 21/? 4