Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11.20.06 Council Minutes COUNCIL MINUTES PRE-MEETING NOVEMBER 20,2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 6:30 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Brian Lindquist, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant 2. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA Councilmember Pritzlaff asked about the list of bills and why there is a variation in pay for election judges. Administrative Services Director Shadick explained that some judges worked the primary or general or both, some worked full or half days, and some required more hours of training. Councilmember Pritzlaffthen asked about the payment for Aslakson's Blacktopping for the mill and overlay project. He stated the project was not completed properly and wanted to make sure money was held back until the work was completed. Councilmember Pritzlaff noted there were ridges in the asphalt and the proper equipment was not used. City Administrator Herlofsky explained the work done in November has not been billed. Councilmember Pritzlaffthen asked about the comprehensive plan amendment for parks and why so much more land was needed for parks at the Fountain Valley Golf Course property and possibly have the clubhouse also. Parks and Recreation Director Distad explained the City identifies park location and acreage after annexation. In this situation it might be approximately 20 acres. The densities will drive the number of acres required for park dedication. Three acres were to be carried over from Executive Estates to this development. Councilmember Pritzlaff noted at the Planning Commission meeting, it was mentioned to also obtain the clubhouse. Staff explained that is something the Parks and Recreation Commission has looked at if the developer was looking at demolishing it, perhaps it could be used as a recreational facility or warming house. Council Minutes (Pre-Meeting) November 20, 2006 Page 2 Councilmember Wilson noted on the monthly financial report there are two enterprise accounts, liquor operations and solid waste, where expenses are moving faster than revenues. There seems to be a larger variance than what was budgeted. Councilmember Wilson supported the Fire Departments pension request, but preferred to have a 2-4 year plan. He suggested a workshop to discuss this and bring it back to the December 4, 2006 meeting. Councilmember McKnight asked about the comprehensive plan amendment for parks and if the proposed trails along the western edge align with the trails in Executive Estates and the industrial area. Staff noted there are no trails along the eastern edge ofthe industrial park. The trails shown are conceptual in nature. They would like three trails going north and south and three trails going east and west through the development. The location will be determined in the concept plan. 225th Street has a trail part way down, but some of the properties are still in the township so there will be a gap. Councilmember McKnight noted he did not want a circle of trails in the development he wants them connecting. Councilmember McKnight noted on the Fountain Valley item, he spoke with Mr. Colin Garvey, and stated Castle Rock has not had time to comment on this. Two days is not a reasonable amount oftime. He suggested approving the MUSA recommendation and table the comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning until after the Castle Rock Town Board has had time to meet. Mayor Soderberg suggested tabling everything until after Castle Rock has reviewed this. The Orderly Annexation Agreement calls for reasonable time to review and comment on a change in the comprehensive plan before Planning Commission or Council approval. Castle Rock received this item two days before their meeting. Two days is not reasonable time. Councilmember McKnight noted the agreement talks about comprehensive plan amendments, not MUSA. He would like to consider the MUSA recommendation. Councilmember Fogarty agreed. Councilmember Wilson noted the developer and the Castle Rock Town Board is here. This is a great example of an item that should not even be on the agenda. Weare wasting people's time. Only items that are ready to be voted on should be on the Council agenda. 5. STAFF COMMENTS City Administrator Herlofsky reminded everyone that the Council and EDA will meet November 27. He provided an updated checklist for the mill and overlay project. 6. ADJOURN MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to adjourn at 6:51 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, '/~./.' -r'~?:-.P7~ '--:;7'-1/C-AUz.- /.....~:.,'/ '-Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR November 20, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Soderberg led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Audience: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Brian Lindquist, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Denise & Dan May, Randy Oswald, Arlyn Lamb, Mark VanDorn, Bill Sauber, Jay Clinkscales, Joel West, Kari Gill, Dan Meyer, Lori Zierden, Chris Engler 4. APPROVE AGENDA Councilmember McKnight moved item 1 Oe) King Property Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning to the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Pritzlaff pulled item 71) Approve Bills for discussion and separate vote. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Pritzlaffto approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS a) Swearing-In Police Officer - Administration Andrew Van Dorn was sworn-in as a new Police Officer. 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS 7. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by McKnight, second by Fogarty to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approved Council Minutes (11/6/06 Regular) (11/8/06 Special) b) Adopted RESOLUTION R124-06 approving application submittal for landfill abatement funds from Dakota County - Public Works c) Approved Donation - Fire Department d) Approved Various Licenses and Permits - Administration e) Set January 6, 2007 Special Council Meeting - Board and Commission Interviews - Administration Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 2 f) Received information capital outlay cable commission - Administration g) Received information October 2006 financial report - Finance h) Approved permitting agreement - Elm Street Project - Engineering i) Adopted RESOLUTION R125-06 approving comprehensive plan amendment concerning existing and proposed parks, trails, and open space plan map - Parks and Recreation j) Acknowledged resignation Community Development - Human Resources k) Received information resident recognition - Police Department The Police Department received a letter thanking the police officers for their assistance in saving a life. m) Adopted RESOLUTIONS R126-06 and R127-06 and ORDINANCE 006-565 approving the King property comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning - Community Development APIF, MOTION CARRIED. I) Approve Bills Councilmember Pritzlaffhad a concern with the bill for Aslakson's Blacktopping for the mill and overlay project. Some areas are patched in the final lift and there are ridges in the asphalt as a commercial size paver was not used. He did not feel the work was acceptable and was not willing to pay the $240,000 without knowing there was money left to repair the work. Also, the manholes need to be raised and the asphalt is higher than the concrete along the curbs. Councilmember McKnight supported delaying approval of this bill until staff can research the work this bill covers. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second McKnight to approve the bills except for Aslakson Blacktopping. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Approve 2007 License Renewals - Administration Applications for On-Sale Liquor and Sunday licenses, Club licenses, On-Sale Intoxicating Malt Liquor and On-Sale Wine licenses, and Sauna and Therapeutic Massages licenses for various businesses were received for renewal for 2007. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve the above licenses for 2007. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Fairhill Development Update - Administration City Administrator Herlofsk~ prepared a response to a letter from Newland Communities regarding 195t Street right-of-way, park dedication, fire station/water tower, and Diamond Path in the Fairhill development. Mr. Peter Coyle, attorney for Newland Communities, stated Newland's request is that the Council establish a working group to work with Newland on addressing Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 3 some of the impacts that are associated with the Fairhill development. There are financial consequences to the above items that Newland wants to be clear about. 195th Street is proposed as a 4-1ane right-of-way. Newland understands it is their obligation to dedicate two lanes of right-of-way to the City with the plat, but there is a difference of opinion with the City and the County as to whether they are obligated to dedicate four lanes with the plat or whether Newland should be compensated for the additional two lanes since it will be constructed in a future phase. Newland is prepared to dedicate the right-of-way, but they want to understand how the issue will be addressed over the life ofthe contract. Regarding the park in the southwest area, when the comp plan was approved in June, Newland had intentions of working with the school district on a school site in the southwest corner. In the alternative, it was identifying land it would use for residential development. Newland also showed a public park of30 acres. Staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission would like the park in the southwest corner to be a 55-acre park. Newland understood that was an interest of the City, but it was not a part of the comp plan approval. Mr. Coyle noted this was a surprise to Newland that they would be required to dedicate the entire 55 acres as part of the plat. They are not opposed to the City having control of a 55-acre park, but they would like to be compensated for a portion of it. Newland has proposed in excess ofthe policy for park dedication. It is a manner of how the land transfer will occur over ten years. The City does not have money budgeted for the development of a major park development like what is being planned by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Mr. Coyle asked the Council to appoint a committee comprised of two Councilmembers, members of the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff. The goal would be to get these issues addressed. He asked Council to not take action to approve the letter proposed by staff. Mayor Soderberg stated this letter does not close off the ability to negotiate. Councilmember Wilson noted the 55 acres is clearly identified in the parks master plan so he was confused that Newland thought this was new information. He was curious as to why a sub-committee would be more effective than working with the entire Council. Mr. Coyle replied the City approved the comp plan for Fairhill in June. He noted the minutes contain no discussion as part of the comp plan amendment that the City would be seeking a 55-acre park in the southwest corner. Their plan showed half of the corner would be either residential or a school site. The school site has not materialized, so they plan to go forward with residential development. Regarding the committee concept, some of the issues are very expensive questions. Newland wanted better confidence as to how the issues would be resolved. They felt a committee would be more productive. Councilmember Wilson stated he would support one or more workshops with Newland. Councilmember Pritzlaffwas not comfortable with having a committee and would support a Council workshop with Newland. Councilmember Fogarty stated she was frustrated with the inconsistency in items in the Council packet. She was very open to having a Council workshop with Newland to discuss the items. Councilmember McKnight noted the City's relationship with Newland has Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 4 been very positive. He did not think it was appropriate for Mr. Coyle to be in attendance questioning a letter the City Administrator will be sending if the Council says yes, before it is sent. Mayor Soderberg stated the attorney has advised this letter does not close the door on discussions. The letter has been prepared based on Council discussions and Parks and Recreation Commission discussions. City Administrator Herlofsky stated the purpose was to get Council's reaction, and suggested staff do more research on the items and have more consistency. Council reached a consensus to table this item for a future meeting. b) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Twin Ponds Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Plat and Wetland Conservation Act Permit - Community Development The CDA has submitted an application for a comp plan amendment, rezoning and wetland conservation act permit for the Twin Ponds development. There is a roadway extension in the southern portion ofthe project to tie into Executive Estates. The comp plan shows medium density residential. On the southern piece the CDA would like to plat six single family lots and 223rd Street would separate this from the medium density. The proposed zoning is R-1. The CDA proposes 10 buildings with a total of 50 units. They will be rental townhomes owned by the CDA. The streets will be private roadways and a tot lot will be included. There are a total of 132 parking spaces. There is a 33 ft. wide access to TH3, however it is not enough for a 60 ft. wide right-of-way. The CDA is proposing to give up right-of-way as a backage road and start negotiations with BP or Happy Harry's to obtain additional right-of-way. The backage road would be a regional concept, so this would be reviewed when commercial is developed. With the backage road there could be a full intersection at TH3 and 225th Street, and a center intersection at Centennial Drive. Staff proposed the CDA grant the City a right-of-way for the northerly access. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated if the CDA is not able to obtain 60 ft. for the right-of-way, there will not be access to TH3. He felt this should be worked out first. Staff explained future commercial development may assist in obtaining this access. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked how the development will be accessed from the north. Staff explained the traffic engineer felt the development could have access from the south and does not need access to the north. Looking at it regionally, the outlets would be removed and replaced with the backage road in the future. Councilmember Pritzlaff did not feel it was in the City's best interest to have all the access to the south. Staff explained they will have access to the east and then south and to the west and then south. Councilmember McKnight asked about the timeline for the six single-family lots. Staff noted the eastern portion ofthe townhomes will be built first before the single-family homes in Executive Estates. Councilmember McKnight liked the backage road, but the northerly access is important to him. He does not like doing things that are not complete now. The bigger issue is fairness. They are making Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 5 one developer build an access to a road and build and pay for the road and another developer is able to add on without any costs. Councilmember Wilson agreed with the previous comments. This is an attractive development, but it is not ready for Council yet as far as the transportation. Councilmember Fogarty had concerns about the private park being counted as parkland dedication, the northerly access is very critical, she liked the backage road and the concept ofthe development, but we are picking out a portion of roadway that at some point the City will have to find a way to pay for. Weare setting ourselves up to bond citywide for something that will benefit a small number of people. Mayor Soderberg was concerned with the park dedication and how we deal with private parks. Even though this is a small park, it is a matter of being consistent and fair with everyone. Regarding transportation and the backage road, he would like to make sure we can assess for the road once there is commercial development. He would like to see a plan laid out for this. Parks and Recreation Director Distad explained the park dedication ordinance states the dedication may be given. With this being a public agency, it was decided to give them credit for 1.5 acres. The tot lot is .25 acres. They will have to pay cash in lieu for 1.25 acres they are not dedicating. Other developments containing private parks have been private developments. Mayor Soderberg asked if the fact that this is a public agency makes any difference as far as park dedication. Councilmember McKnight stated with the ordinance saying "may" where do we stop? Staff agreed the ordinance needs to be more specific with situations when this would be done. The City did give the school district credit for park dedication for their ball fields. Councilmember Fogarty stated she agrees a public agency should be granted credit, but it needs to be a written policy. The only concern is what if there is a developer for affordable housing, do we give them the same leeway. Staff suggested bringing this back to the Parks and Recreation Commission to amend the ordinance. Councilmember Pritzlaff would rather have cash-in-lieu than a private park. He agreed with public agencies being granted credit for park dedication as far as schools, however the CDA is a different type of public agency and he would not support the credit. Councilmember Wilson would prefer to stick to the ordinance and if there is deviation there should be rationale for it. Ms. Kari Gill, CDA, stated they typically do pay park dedication fees. The tot lot is primarily intended for the residents, so they would not be opposed to paying the park dedication fee in the full amount. Regarding transportation, Councilmember Pritzlaff was concerned that this project was discussed at one point with Executive Estates or before it was at the current stage. He was suspect with this coming to Council after 225th Street was done. The Council asked the developer of Executive Estates to provide Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 6 transportation routes into the development. Is it Council's role to put stipulations on Executive Estates and those things that have made this property accessible and should Mr. Garvey be compensated for that? He does not think it was fair to hand over a gift of transportation routes. There has to be funds that go back to the developer of Executive Estates. Mayor Soderberg then asked ifRiverbend would be required to pay Dakota Estates and Prairie Creek for the roads they built to access Riverbend. As a policy that would entitle previous developments compensation for roadways for subsequent developments. There are businesses to the north and the south that may benefit from a backage road and they should participate in the payment of that road. Mr. Colin Garvey, developer of Executive Estates, stated the difference with Riverbend is that you have to go through other developments to get there. This development had its own frontage road. He showed an original drawing from 2004 for Executive Estates. Staff required three entrances for a safety issue. When he was working on his plans, he was told 33 ft. was not wide enough because 66 ft. was required by the traffic engineer. Last Tuesday he was informed there was no entrance on the frontage road. When it comes to transportation, there should be consistency. A park for this project was discussed because Executive Estates added a trail to the park. The frontage road is owned by Tollefson and the CDA owns the property to the east. The concern with the frontage road is that at any point the owners may not allow access to the frontage road. The frontage road would provide an access to TH3. Mr. Joel West, Project Manager of Tollefson Development, stated they agree with the access to the north and they are open to providing the easement needed to TH3. This would be a temporary access. City Attorney J amnik recommended taking it as a permanent easement or right-of-way and vacate the areas not needed in the future. Councilmember McKnight stated he would vote for this if we have the northerly access at Centennial Drive. We have a letter from MnDOT saying Centennial Drive is the preferred location for the intersection. Councilmember Pritzlaffwould not support the project without the northerly access to TH3. Councilmember Wilson would also like to have a solid transportation plan identified beforehand. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Pritzlaffto table this to January 16, 2007 and inform the developer of the extension. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Fountain Valley Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and MUSA Recommendation - Community Development Mayor Soderberg recommended tabling this item to allow Castle Rock time to consider this item. Two days is not reasonable time. Councilmember Pritzlaff was not sure why staff did not get it to Castle Rock sooner to allow them enough Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 7 time for review. This project has been worked on and delayed and Castle Rock knew it was coming. He does not understand why this should be delayed since it has already gone to the Planning Commission. Mayor Soderberg noted the Planning Commission took action on an application that was not signed by the owner of record. It should not have been brought to the Planning Commission. Councilmember Wilson noted items lOb and 10c were not ready to be on the agenda. It gave the developer the sense Council was prepared to act on this tonight. Councilmember McKnight recognized the requirements ofthe Orderly Annexation Agreement where the City has to give the Town Board time to review the comprehensive plan amendment. He felt they did have enough information to act on the MUSA recommendation. Mr. Russ Zellmer, Castle Rock Town Board Chair, requested time to review the development and have the full board comment in writing. Councilmember Fogarty agreed that the Town Board should have time to comment. By putting this on the agenda we gave the developer the impression we would be doing something with this tonight. Approving the MUSA is fair. Mr. Colin Garvey, of Castle Rock Development, stated he believed this would be acted on tonight. Not all signatures are received until the final plat. He has gone as far as preliminary plat before the township has signed off on property. He asked for a favorable recommendation. He has waited long enough. He will continue to work with the township and the City on parks, screening, etc. Mayor Soderberg noted moving forward without having the signature from the owner of record is not a judicious thing to do. We have a process to follow. This development will be good for the whole City, but to do this at the expense of the process is wrong. To move forward with MUSA tonight is token. It goes no where until there is a comp plan amendment. Councilmember McKnight appreciated wanting to follow the process, but the MUSA is not included in the Orderly Annexation Agreement. By acting on MUSA it does not violate the contract. MOTION by McKnight, second by Fogarty approving the Fountain Valley property to Farmington's Metropolitan Urban Service Area. The remaining requests will be tabled until the December 18, 2006 Council Meeting. Councilmember Wilson proposed splitting the questions for separate vote on the items. Councilmember McKnight asked what happens if Council votes down a comp plan amendment. Attorney J amnik stated the application would be dead and would have to be re-filed and go through the Planning Commission. Tabling is preferred if it is a viable application. Voting for the vote split: Pritzlaff, Wilson. Voting against the vote split: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight. Request fails. Voting for the motion to adopt RESOLUTION R128-06 approving MUSA and table the other requests until December 18,2006: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff. Voting against: Wilson. MOTION CARRIED. Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 8 d) Adopt Resolution - Riverbend 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat - Community Development Homes by Chase is proposing to re-plat the northern 75 acres ofthe Riverbend subdivision. They would like to add 13 lots to the area. The origInal plat called for 140 lots in the entire development. Riverbend 2nd Addition will contain 78 single-family lots. The developer is proposing two outlots for an area where a number of residents in Dakota County Estates claim they have a right to. It will be determined later whether the property will be divided by an easement or a deed. Outlot C is being held as a potential roadway connection to the north. Parks and Recreation have approved the location ofthe park and trails. Approval ofthe preliminary plat is contingent on the following: 1. Approval of the construction plans for grading, storm water and utilities by the Engineering Division. 2. Submittal of a SWPPP and dewatering plan to the SWCD. MOTION by Wilson, second by McKnight to adopt RESOLUTION R129-06 approving the Riverbend Preliminary Plat with the above contingencies. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. f) Approve Change Order No.1 Spruce Street - Engineering The change order is for a total of $40,000. MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaff to table this item until the December 4, 2006 Council Meeting. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. g) Adopt Resolution - Dakota County CDA Redevelopment Incentive Grant Program - Community Development Staff requested authorization to submit an application to the CDA for grant funds. The CDA has created a new grant program due to changes in the CDBG program. The funds would be used to assist with the demolition ofthe Riste building and the costs of hazardous materials abatement. The City can apply to the CDA to have the money allocated away from this project. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Wilson to adopt RESOLUTION R130-06 authorizing staffto submit an application for a grant in an amount not to exceed $66,804.90. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Cataract Relief Association Pension Request - Administration The Cataract Relief Association has requested a pension increase for 2007 from $3,350 to $3,750. The City's contribution of $65,000 is already in the 2007 budget. Mr. Bill Sauber, member of the Cataract Relief Association, stated the association would like Council to consider the increase to $3,750 per year of service. Councilmember Wilson supported the $3,750, however, he would like to see a 4- year plan for long range planning. Mr. Sauber noted he did not have enough time Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 9 to come up with a long-range plan. Councilmember Wilson proposed accepting the $400 increase so for 2007 it would be $3,750 and have it increase $150 per year each year through 2010. This would bring the association in line with other cities. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked how many people are eligible for retirement this year and how many years do they have. Mr. Sauber replied there are 7-9 people that have 20 years of service or more that could retire. Five are over 50 years old and could collect their money immediately. How it affects the fund depends on how many retire and when. If the association makes 5% on their money next year they will be at 96% funded at the end of 2007. Councilmember Wilson wanted to see the impact of retirements and the projection. A discussion followed on various amounts for increases over the next few years. Councilmember Wilson proposed setting a workshop to discuss a plan. It was determined to hold a workshop on November 27,2006 at 4:30 p.m. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to table this item to the December 4, 2006 Council Meeting. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Councilmember Fogarty: Noted in the bills there were 56 election judges paid and thanked them for their service. She complimented Councilmembers McKnight and Wilson for helping with the Rambling River Days fundraiser. Councilmember McKnight: Strategic planning worksheets should be returned to City Administrator Herlofsky by Wednesday. He requested dates be set for the 2007 retreat and regular workshops. Councilmember Wilson: Asked staff to contact developers for their thoughts on plans for 2007. He thanked Officer Sundvall for leading the boy scout troop on a tour of the police station. Councilmember Pritzlaff: Attended the special School Board meeting last Friday regarding the new land swap agreement between the Christensen's and the school district. One concern he had is the agreement mentions 1 + acres that the Christensen's will have an easement on. He wondered if this would leave a conforming lot. It will but he questions how it can be a conforming lot ifthe owner of the property is the one that has the easement. The property owner should own it and the other party should have the easement. The land swap details 18 acres along Flagstaff that he feels could be valued higher if it was zoned commercial. City Administrator Herlofsky: Planning prepared a map showing there are 877 vacant lots in the City that have services and are waiting for a house to be built. Council Minutes (Regular) November 20, 2006 Page 10 Mayor Soderberg: Attended Veteran's Day programs this week. The Middle School West does a great program honoring veterans. Council recessed at 9:46 p.m. for Executive Session. 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION a) City Administrator Evaluation 15. ADJOURN Respectfully submitted, C~P-7~~ c7 Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant