Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05.15.17 Council Packet
Meeting Location: Farmington Farmington City Hall Minnesota 430 Third Street Farmington,MN 55024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA May 15, 2017 7:00 P.M. Action Taken 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OFALLEGL4NCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA S. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS a) Adopt a Resolution Recognizing National Police Week R30-17 b) Dakota County Commissioner Mike Slavik Information Received 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS/RESPONSES TO COMMENTS(This time is reserved for citizen comments regarding non-agenda items. No official action can be taken on these items. Speakers are limited to five minutes to address the city council during citizen comment time.) 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Minutes of the May 1, 2017 City Council Meeting—Administration Approved b) Approve Minutes of the May 8, 2017 City Council Meeting—Administration Approved c) Approve Agreement with Telin Transportation for Temporary Use of Parking Area—Administration Approved d) Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation from Happy Harry's Furniture to the Rambling River Center—Parks R31-17 e) Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation to the Rambling River Center—Parks R32-17 f) Approve Amended Joint Powers Agreement with the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization for the Vermillion River Bank Stabilization and Habitat Restoration Project in Rambling River Park—Parks Approved g) Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation for Pollution Prevention Day from Dakota Electric—Municipal Services R33-17 h) Approve Contracts for the Water Sanitary Sewer, Surface Water and Transportation Plans for 2040 Comp Plan- Engineering Approved i) Approve 2017 Trail Crack Sealing Agreement—Engineering Approved j) Appointment Recommendation Liquor Operations—Human Resources Approved k) Acknowledge Retirement Municipal Services—Human Resources Acknowledged 1) Approve Seasonal Hiring—Human Resources Approved m) Adopt Resolution Declaring Surplus Property- Police R34-17 n) Approve Bills - Finance Approved REGULAR AGENDA 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT a) Approve Agreement Prairieview Park Basketball Court Construction - Parks Tabled to 6/5/17 10. PETITIONS,REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) 2016 Management and Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Approved 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. CITY COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN o$E104 City of Farmington , =Z 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 -.A no*, www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Brian Lindquist, Police Chief SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Recognizing National Police Week DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION In 1962 Congress enacted a resolution that allowed the President of the United States to proclaim May 15th of each year as Peace Officers Memorial Day and the calendar week of each year which May 15th occurs as National Police Week. In 1994, the President of the United States signed public law directing that flags of the United States be flown at half-staff on all government buildings on May 15. During this week and on the day of May 15, citizens are encouraged to recognize the sacrifices and contributions of our police officers and to honor those men and women that have fallen in the line of duty. DISCUSSION The Farmington Police Department includes 24 sworn officers. To honor these men and women, the attached resolution states the city council's intent to observe the week of May 14-20, 2017 as Police Week and the declare May 15th as Peace Officers Memorial Day. The attached resolution also encourages flags to be flown at half-staff on May 15th in recognition of Peace Officers Memorial Day, honoring those men and women who have lost their lives in the performance of their duties. BUDGET IMPACT There is no budget impact associated with this resolution. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution declaring May 15, 2017 as Peace Officers Memorial Day and the week of May 14-20, 2017 as Police Week in Farmington. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description 0 Cover Memo Resolution RESOLUTION No. R30-17 A Resolution Recognizing the Week of May 15th as "National Police Week" And the day of May 15th as "Peace Officers Memorial Day" Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the council chambers of said city on the 15th day of May, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Larson, Bartholomay, Craig Members Absent: Bernhj elm, Donnelly Member Bartholomay introduced, and Member Craig seconded the following: WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States of America has designated the week of May 15th to be dedicated as "National Police Week" and the day of May 15th each year to be "Peace Officers' Memorial Day"; and WHEREAS, Law Enforcement Officers are our guardians of life and property, defenders of the individual right to be free, and dedicated to the preservation of life, liberty and justice; and WHEREAS, it is important that all citizens know and understand the duties, responsibilities, hazards, and sacrifices of their law enforcement agency, and that members of our law enforcement agency recognize their duty to serve the people by safeguarding life and property, by protecting them against violence and disorder, and by protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against oppression; and WHEREAS, the Farmington City Council desires to honor the valor, service and dedication of the Police Officers that serve the city of Farmington. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of Farmington on this 15th day of May, 2017 that the week of May 14th to May 20th be observed as "Police Week", and call upon all Farmington residents to especially honor and show our appreciation for the Police Officers of the city of Farmington by deed, remark and attitude; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the day of May 15th be proclaimed to be "Peace Officers' Memorial Day" and that flags be flown at half-staff on this day in honor of those men and women who have lost their lives in the performance of their duties, while protecting their fellow citizens and communities. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 15th day of May, 2017 ayor Attested to the "14 day of May, 2017. 00".„ City Administrator yo�c�A�►i�, City of Farmington 3~ 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota `rs 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 -•".*moowww.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: David McKnight, City Administrator SUBJECT: Dakota County Commissioner Mike Slavik DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION Dakota County Commissioner Mike Slavik will be in attendance at the May 15, 2017 city council meeting to present his semi-annual update to the city council. DISCUSSION Commissioner Slavik makes it a habit to update the Farmington City Council on activities occurring at the county a few times each year. Commissioner Slavik will be in attendance at the meeting this week to share information on a number of issues. BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Hear the presentation made by Commissioner Slavik and ask any questions you may have. io�FA6 r City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 - Fax 651.280.6899 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: David McKnight, City Administrator SUBJECT: Approve Minutes of the May 1, 2017 City Council Meeting-Administration DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION Attached for your review are the minutes from the May 1, 2017 city council meeting. DISCUSSION NA BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Approve the minutes of the May 1, 2017 city council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description ❑ Backup Material May 1, 2017 City Council Minutes CITY OF FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING MAY 1, 2017 1. Call to Order Mayor Larson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance Troop 116 led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Roll Call Present-Larson, Bernhjelm, Donnelly, and Craig Absent-Bartholomay Staff Present-Administrator McKnight, Finance Director Hanson, Public Works Director Gehler, Parks and Recreation Director Distad, Human Resources Director Wendlandt, Police Chief Lindquist, Fire Chief Larsen and Attorney Jamnik. 4. Agenda Motion by Bernhjelm, second by Craig,to approve the agenda as presented. APIF, motion carried. 5. Announcements/Commendations a) Recognize Anchor Bank's 50th Anniversary and Proclaim May 1, 2017 as Anchor Bank Day in Farmington Mayor Larson read a proclamation declaring May 1, 2017 as Anchor Bank Day in Farmington in recognition of their 50th anniversary. Anchor Bank CEO Carl Jones shared his appreciation for the partnerships that exists in the Farmington community and for the city's recognition of the anniversary. b) Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation to the Farmington Police and Fire Departments from the Bourbon Butcher Police Chief Lindquist and Fire Chief Larsen shared their appreciation for the Bourbon Butcher and the event they held in December 2016 that raised money May 1, 2017 Minutes -1- for Toys for Town and the purchase of defibrillators. The event raised almost $13,000 for the two departments. The two chiefs and the city council expressed their appreciation for this business and their willingness to assist the community in many ways. The restaurant owners thanked the city for the recognition and the community for the support that the business has received since it opened. Motion by Craig, second by Bernhjelm,to approve resolution R28-2017 accepting the donation to the Farmington Police and Fire Departments from the Bourbon Butcher. APIF, motion carried. 6. Citizen Comments None 7. Consent Agenda Motion by Donnelly, second by Bernhjelm, to approve the consent agenda: a) Approve Minutes of the April 13, 2017 City Council Work Session-Administration b) Approve Minutes of the April 17, 2017 City Council Meeting-Administration c) Approve Joint Powers Cost Sharing Agreement for Pictometry Aerial Photography- Human Resources d) Approve Image Trend Elite Product Upgrade Software Agreement-Human Resources e) Adopt Resolution R29-2017 Declaring Surplus Property-Fire f) Approve Bills-Finance APIF, motion carried. 8. Public Hearings None 9. Award of Contract a) Approve Agreement Hill Dee Park and Jim Bell Park and Preserve Basketball Court Improvement Project Parks and Recreation Director Distad presented the bids for the Hill Dee Park and Jim Bell Park and Preserve basketball court improvement project. The courts have been identified as courts in need for improvements. The city sent out quotes to four contractors and received and received two back. The low quote is from Court Surfaces May 1, 2017 Minutes -2- and Repair Inc. in the amount of$9,675. Funding for this project is included in the 2017 park maintenance budget. Motion by Bernhjelm, second by Craig,to approve the agreement with Court Surfaces and Repair, Inc. in the amount of$9,675 for the repair and resurfacing of the Hill Dee Park and Jim Bell Park and Preserve basketball courts. APIF, motion carried. b) Approve Agreement to Construct Prairieview Park Concrete Playground Border and Bench Pads Parks and Recreation Director Distad presented the bids for the Prairieview Park playground border and bench pads. A new concrete border and bench pads have been identified as being necessary to go along with the new playground equipment at Prairieview Park. The city solicited quotes from 17 contractors for this project. Six contractors submitted quotes with the low quote coming from Erickson Construction in the amount of$9,920. The funding for this project was included in the 2017 budget park improvement fund. Motion by Donnelly,second by Craig,to approve the agreement with Erickson Construction of Lakeville, Inc. in the amount of$9,920 for the installation of the Prairieview Park concrete playground border and three concrete pads for park benches. APIF, motion carried. 10. Petitions, Requests and Communications None 11. Unfinished Business None 12. New Business a) 2016 Fire Department Annual Report Fire Chief Larsen presented the 2016 fire department annual report. The chief reported on a number of issues of importance throughout the year including the department mission, call volumes, calls by specific area,training, certifications, health and wellness initiatives,vehicle upgrades, response times, promotions that occurred, the annual open house,firefighter of the year Matt Price, city support for the department,the auxiliary and fire relief support of the department and other donations received. Councilmember Bernhjelm asked about the call volume increase. Larsen stated that it is not unusual. May 1,2017 Minutes -3- Bernhjelm asked if we partnered with other cities. Larsen shared the history of working with the Lakeville and Apple Valley, among others, on specific training. Bernhjelm asked about working with local businesses on issues. Larsen shared the work the department does on CPR training,fire extinguisher training and more. All councilmembers thanked the department for the work they do for the entire community. 13. City Council Roundtable Donnelly-Thanked the fire department for making a great contribution to the community, congratulated Anchor Bank on their anniversary and thanked the Bourbon Butcher for their donation. Bernhjelm-Thanked the fire department and all of those in attendance at the meeting, shared information on the Rambling River Center Plaza Open House and encouraged residents to visit the city website to share their thoughts. Craig-Thanked the fire department for their work, congratulated Anchor Bank on their anniversary and thanked those who attend the Rambling River Center Plaza Open House. McKnight-The police department will be having an open house on May 18, 2017. Larson-Encouraged residents to shop local. Adjourn Motion by Donnelly, second by Bernhjelm, to adjourn the meeting at 7:57 p.m. APIF, motion carried. Respectfully Submitted David McKnight, City Administrator May 1,2017 Minutes -4- �o�iARitit� City of Farmington U 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota ________ 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 •A,NOWWW.W.c i.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: David McKnight, City Administrator SUBJECT: Approve Minutes of the May 8, 2017 City Council Meeting-Administration DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION Attached for your review are the minutes from the May 8, 2017 city council work session. DISCUSSION NA BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Approve the minutes of the May 8, 2017 city council work session. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material May 8, 2017 City Council Work Session Minutes CITY OF FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES WORK SESSION MAY 8,2017 Mayor Larson called the work session to order at 6:30 p.m. Roll Call Present-Larson, Bartholomay, and Craig Absent-Donnelly and Bernhjelm Staff Present-Administrator McKnight, Human Resources Director Wendlandt, Communication Specialist Cahlander, Public Works Director Gehler and Finance Director Hanson Agenda Motion by Bartholomay, second by Craig,to adopt the agenda as presented. APIF, motion carried. City Communications Discussion Human Resources Director Wendlandt and Communications Specialist Cahlander reviewed the different efforts the city makes in communicating with residents. Staff reviewed the following types of communication the city currently undertakes: ✓ Online Efforts (website, Facebook, etc.) ✓ Print Options (Guide, Calendar, etc.) ✓ Advertising and Marketing ✓ Television and Video (Channel 180,YouTube Channel) ✓ Intranet Cahlander reviewed the city's efforts at branding and our current communication guide. Staff discussed the amount of work involved in our communication efforts and the need to remember that if additional items are warranted a prioritization will need to occur. Cable Fund Review Finance Director Hanson and Human Resources Director Wendlandt reviewed the cable fund with the city council. May 8,2017 Work Session Minutes -1- The city has a current cable franchise agreement with Frontier and is operating under an expired agreement with Charter. Wendlandt reviewed the history of the Apple Valley, Farmington, and Rosemount Cable Commission. Farmington is responsible for 25%of the budget of the organization. Wendlandt reviewed the PEG and franchise fees we receive from both agreements. In addition, an update was provided on the status of negotiations with Charter and the possibility of moving to the formal process soon. The fund balance in PEG fees and franchise fees at the end of 2016 was reviewed. 2018/2019 Budget Discussion Finance Director Hanson reviewed the draft 2018/2019 budget calendar with the city council. The June 2017 work session will be used as the city council kick off with a review of the 2030 financial plan and an outline of the 2018/2019 budget process. Previous decisions impacting the 2018 budget will be reviewed and city council priorities will be discussed. The draft calendar was reviewed with the important September and December preliminary and final levy deadlines noted. Review of Outstanding Items Administrator McKnight reviewed a list of outstanding items that the city council has discussed over the past few months. The city council provided direction on a number of issues including directing staff to start the process to place an ordinance in effect limiting where sex offenders can reside in the city. Adjourn Motion by Craig, second by Bartholomay,to adjourn the meeting at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted David McKnight, City Administrator May 8,2017 Work Session Minutes -2- 01+ 9► City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 .,,01101041 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: David McKnight, City Administrator SUBJECT: Approve Agreement with Telin Transportation for Temporary Use of Parking Area- Administration DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION Telin Transportation of Farmington has requested the temporary use of city property behind fire station one for the parking of 20 school buses for the period of May 31, 2017 through July 21, 2017. DISCUSSION Telin Transportation has requested the temporary use of vacant space behind fire station one located on Denmark Avenue for the storage of 20 school buses. These are new buses that are awaiting delivery to school districts in the area. Telin has no room for the storage of these buses at their facility. The buses are approximately eight feet wide and 40 feet long. If they are parked two deep and ten wide, they would need an area approximately 100 feet wide by 100 feet deep to give walking room around the buses. Telin has proposed a rent payment to the city of$1,666.67 for the use of our land. The risk to parking the buses behind our fire station is entirely with Telin and they have signed a release and waiver of liability for the city. This temporary assistance to a city business goes a long way towards showing the continued support the city offers the business community. BUDGET IMPACT The proposed$1,666.67 rent payment will be placed into General Fund revenue. ACTION REQUESTED If the city council is comfortable with this proposal a motion should be made to authorize Telin Transportation to use approximately 10,000 square feet behind fire station one for the storage of 20 buses from May 31, 2017 through approximately July 21, 2017. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material Additional Information (t7r}' 1 Telin Transportation Group, LLC 5121 212TH St Farmington, MN 55024 TRANSPORTATION GROUP 952-435-9060 TELIN TRANSPORTATION—FARMINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT STATION 1 SCHOOL BUS STORAGE PROPOSAL Telin Transportation in Farmington,MN is looking for storage of 20 brand new school buses from approximately May 31, 2017 until approximately July 21,2017.Many of our customers are school districts that cannot take delivery until after July 1,and we will be overfilled at our location.There will be minimal movement of these buses when they are stored there. The buses are approximately 8'wide and 40'long,if they are parked 2 deep and 10 wide,we would need an area approximately 100'wide by 100'deep(see attachment A)to give walking room around the buses.We are willing to pay rent to the City of Farmington,or a donation to the Farmington Fire Department.We also take trades on school buses that we sometimes salvage and are more than willing to donate some of those to the Farmington Fire Department/Farmington Police Department as well to practice extrication or rescue techniques on,regardless of coming to an agreement on storage or not. As a guideline,going off of past agreements at different locations,the rent for outdoor storage Is usually around$1 a square foot per year: 100'x 100'=10,000 square ft. 10,000 x$1=$10,000 $10,000/12 months=$833.34 per month 2 months x$833.34=$1,666.67 If the City of Farmington,MN and the Farmington Fire Department are open to allow us park our buses at this location during the time frame mentioned above,we can discuss further the cost of rental for the location. Thank you for considering this proposal and we look forward to speaking with you soon. Brian Hanson Account Manager Telin Transportation bhanson@telingroup.com 612-799-1251 Attachments:Map of desired storage location,Telin Transportation Insurance Coverage on Vehicles,and Waiver of Liability. 1 Thomas Built School Bus Minnesota Distributor Telin Transportation Group www.telingroup.com VEHICLE STORAGE RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY The undersigned Telin Transportation Group,L.L.C.,a Minnesota limited liability company,("Telin") acknowledges that the City of Farmington(the"City")is extending a privilege in allowing Telin to store its buses on the City's property.In consideration of the privilege to store Telin's buses at the Farmington Fire Station#11ot(the "Lot"),the undersigned,for itself and any successors and asssigns,hereby acknowledges,agrees and represents the following: 1. Acceptance of Risk. Telin understands that the City never intended for nor designed the Lot to be used as a storage facility,and Telin acknowledges that the City does not guarantee the security of the property being stored.In addition,Telin acknowledges that the Lot is not locked,secured or guarded.Therefore,Telin agrees to assume full responsibility any property damage due to the negligence of the City or otherwise while Telin's buses are stored upon or about the Lot. 2. Release. Telin agrees to release,waive,and discharge the City,its council,employees,and agents from all liability for any loss,theft,damage,claims or demands therefore on account of injury to Telin's property,whether caused by the negligence of the City or otherwise,while storing its buses on the Lot. 3. No Verbal Modification. No waiver,disclaimer or warranty contained in this Agreement may be modified by any verbal representations,agreements or statements made by any employee,officer,or owner on behalf of Telin. Telin Transportation Group,L.L.C. Date: By: Todd Telin Its: President/General Manager (Attachment A) Area interested in for storage - 'ai• -. . , -..-/ -*-4 • _ _ I .1 . .0 / ";!...ver* '' • . ' - 1 "7 Olf t • • 5' !• . ,, ...,. r. ..... -.. • ' :.1 -i- .. I l . - • . I ' 1 . ' . , . I _.... . .. ._ 4 .4.4' • IA ' THIS IS THE AREA THAP • ' . En ' --1 Farmington Fire Station rit! TEL-IN . '44 ir . ( J ' TRANSPORTATION itli i & ' . . INTERESTED IN UilVC - - - .. ../ , 41 .. . r T.is FOR STORAGE. ,,...^-•' Vti • .41". '... ..? ) I eD AP _ ,: .7. a ‘'... ; 3 i a) ''• I ' - --.- . ' `Ltat • -4•1•A4- . .. _ - - • ,-- • , I - -`,' - ------- -. , ;• , { ', . -. ... - �o�EAR ►i, r City of Farmington 430 Thud Street Farmington, Minnesota 'h► 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 .4 no*? www.cifannington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation from Happy Harry's Furniture to the Rambling River Center-Parks DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION Happy Harry's Furniture recently made a donation to the Rambling River Center. DISCUSSION A donation in the amount of$369.00 was made by Happy Harry's Furniture to the RRC. The donation was made through a program created in 2011, in which a customer of Happy Harry's Furniture is able to select a charity of their choice to receive a donation when merchandise is purchased from the store and then 10% from the sale to the customer is donated to the charity. The RRC is one of the charities that can be selected. With this most recent donation, Happy Harry's Furniture has donated a total of$9,045.92 to the RRC since the program's inception. This donation has been deposited into the Rambling River Center Capital Improvement Fund. Accepting this donation fits with the city council's partnership priority because it provides an opportunity to continue a beneficial relationship with an existing partner. Staff will communicate the city's appreciation on behalf of the city council to Happy Harry's Furniture for its generous donation to the Rambling River Center. BUDGET IMPACT This donation has been deposited into the RRC Capital Improvement Fund and will be used for either future Rambling River Center building improvements or purchase of furniture/equipment. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution accepting the donation of$369.00 from Happy Harry's Furniture to the Rambling River Center. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Resolution Donation Resolution RESOLUTION NO. R31-17 ACCEPT CASH DONATION TO THE RAMBLING RIVER CENTER FROM HAPPY HARRY'S FURNITURE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Farmington, Minnesota,was held in the council chambers of said city on the 15t day of May, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Larson,Bartholomay, Craig Members Absent: Bernhjelm, Donnelly Member Bartholomay introduced and Member Craig seconded the following: WHEREAS, a$369.00 donation was made by Happy Harry's Furniture to the Rambling River Center; and, WHEREAS, it is required by State Statute that this donation be formally accepted; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the city to accept this donation. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED the city of Farmington hereby accepts with gratitude the generous donation of$369.00 from Happy Harry's Furniture to the Rambling River Center. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 15th day of May, 2017. ‘r7;' ;' Mayor Attested to the /6 ' day of May, 2017. 4( ! ,, CA y Administrat SEAL (citAltike, City of Farmington 430 Third Street } Farmington, Minnesota 'ai 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 ''�►.,, ,a www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation to the Rambling River Center-Parks DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION Tim Carey recently made a donation to the Rambling River Center. DISCUSSION Tim Carey recently donated a gas grill to the Rambling River Center at a value of$109.00. During each of the past eight years, Mr. Carey has provided his own gas grill and volunteered his time to prepare sausages for the annual Rambling River Center Dad's Belgian Waffle Breakfast fundraiser. This grill will not only be used during this fundraiser, but will also be used for other events and functions that are held at the Rambling River Center when it is appropriate to do so. Accepting this donation fits with the city council's partnership priority because it provides an opportunity to continue a beneficial relationship with an existing partner and volunteer. Staff will communicate the city's appreciation on behalf of the city council to Tim Carey for his generous donation of the gas grill to the Rambling River Center. BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution accepting the donation of a new gas grill valued at$109.00 from Tim Carey to the Rambling River Center. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Resolution Donation Resolution RESOLUTION NO. R32-17 ACCEPT GRILL DONATION TO THE RAMBLING RIVER CENTER FROM TIM CAREY Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the council chambers of said city on the 15t day of May, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Larson, Bartholomay, Craig Members Absent: Bernhjelm, Donnelly Member Bartholomay introduced and Member Craig seconded the following: WHEREAS, a new gas grill donation valued at $109.00 was made by Tim Carey to the Rambling River Center; and, WHEREAS, it is required by State Statute that this donation be formally accepted; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the city to accept this donation. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED the city of Farmington hereby accepts with gratitude the generous donation of a new gas grill valued at $109.00 from Tim Carey to the Rambling River Center. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 15th day of May, 2017. Mayor Attested to the /G 44 day of May, 2017. • CI y Administrat SEAL /014,4,, City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 r `� www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Approve Amended Joint Powers Agreement with the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization for the Vermillion River Bank Stabilization and Habitat Restoration Project in Rambling River Park-Parks DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION City staff worked with staff from the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization(VRWJP 0)to submit a Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Conservation Partners Legacy Grant in the amount of$255,000 for work on a stabilizing and restoring habitat project in a portion of the Vermillion River that is located in Rambling River Park. The grant was approved for funding and the city entered into a Joint Powers Agreement(JPA)identifying each party's responsibility during the project. DISCUSSION The original JPA did not include language addressing frail reconstruction due to damage that will occur during the project. The attached amended JPA addresses trail reconstruction in the following manner: • The trail shall be an alternative bid item for the project • The city and VRWJPO shall mutually agree whether to accept the alternate bid for the project • If the bid is acceptable to both the city and the VRWJPO, then payment to the contractor for the trail reconstruction will be made by the VRWJPO • After payment is made by the VRWJPO, then the city shall reimburse the VRWJPO for the cost of the trail reconstruction up to an amount not to exceed the engineer's estimate of$29,388.00 • The city shall oversee and administer the trail reconstruction part of the Project The City Attorney reviewed the amended JPA and found it to be acceptable. BUDGET IMPACT The budget impact remains the same as before. Trail reconstruction costs of up to $29,388.00 will be paid through a transfer from the General Fund as a result of revenues exceeding expenditures in the 2016 budget. The city council had previously approved this transfer during its April 3, 2017 meeting. In addition, city staff will provide project management to satisfy its $20,000.00 in-kind matching requirement the grant application identified. ACTION REQUESTED Staff is requesting the city council approve the attached amended JPA with the VRWJPO for the Vermillion River bank stabilization and habitat restoration project in Rambling River Park. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description ❑ Backup Material Amended Joint Powers Agreement Dakota County Contract#C0028081.1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VERMILLION RIVER WATERSHED JOINT POWERS ORGANIZATION AND THE CITY OF FARMINGTON FOR THE RAMBLING RIVER PARK STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT WHEREAS,effective July 13,2016,the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization and the City of Farmington entered into a Joint Powers Agreement for the Rambling River Park Stream Habitat Restoration Project. WHEREAS,the Parties desire to amend the terms of the Agreement as set out below;and WHEREAS,the Agreement provides that any amendments shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the Parties. NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein the Parties agree as follows: 1. To amend the recitals as follows: WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. §471.59 authorizes local governmental units to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties;and WHEREAS,the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization is a watershed management body consisting of Dakota and Scott Counties(VRWJPO)governed by the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Board (VRWJPB)and is charged with carrying out the duties set forth in Minn.Stat.§§ 103B.211 to 103B.255 and as otherwise provided by law;and WHEREAS,the City of Farmington(City)is a governmental and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS,the Vermillion River(River)is within the City;and WHEREAS,the Vermillion River passes through Rambling River Park(Park),a City Park that provides recreational opportunities for the public;and WHEREAS, a trail adjacent to the river is at risk of being compromised due to stream bank erosion;and WHEREAS,the City contacted the VRWJPO to request assistance in addressing the erosion to protect the trail; and WHEREAS,the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) has identified the River as a total suspended solids, dissolved oxygen,fish, macroinvertebrate,and E. coli bacteria impaired water;and WHEREAS,the City is required under its Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System(MS4)permit issued by the MPCA to reduce pollutant loads for portions of the City that drain to the River;and WHEREAS,the VRWJPO identified habitat restoration and streambank stabilization as strategies to address fish, macroinvertebrate,and total suspended solids impairments as identified in the Vermillion River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy(WRAPS)as well as meet goals outlined within the Vermillion River Watershed Management Plan;and WHEREAS, habitat restoration can incorporate measures to address streambank erosion, protect the City's trail, and reduce sediment loads to the River;and WHEREAS,the VRWJPO applied for and received a Conservation Partners Legacy Grant(Grant)from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources(DNR)to construct a stream habitat restoration project(Project)in Rambling River Park;and Page 1 of 3 Dakota County Contract#C0028081.1 WHEREAS,the VRWJPO has committed$30,000 worth of in-kind staff time to design,oversee,and manage the Project and grant and$5,000 cash as Grant match to implement the Project;and WHEREAS,the City has committed$20,000 worth of in-kind staff time as grant match to work with the VRWJPO to select a contractor; oversee and administer the construction of the Project;and assist with the review, and verification of the expenses within the contractor's invoices;and WHEREAS,construction of the Project will damage a portion of the City trail and will require reconstruction(Trail Reconstruction);and WHEREAS,the City will oversee and administer the trail reconstruction;and WHEREAS,the City will reimburse the VRWJPO for the cost of the trail reconstruction. 2. To Amend Article 5 of the Agreement as follows: 5.3 The VRWJPO shall make payment to the contractor on a monthly basis based on the City's review and verification of contractor's invoices,and acceptance by the VRWJPO that the expenses are for contractor's expenses in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 5.4 The VRWJPO may refuse to pay any claim that is not specifically authorized by this Agreement. Payment of a claim shall not preclude the VRWJPO from questioning the propriety of the claim.The VRWJPO reserves the right to offset any overpayment or disallowance of claim by reducing future payments. 5.5 THE VRWJPO will pay the contractor for the trail reconstruction.The City shall reimburse the VRWJPO for the cost of the trail reconstruction up to an amount not to exceed the engineer's estimate of Twenty-Nine Thousand Three Hundred Eighty-Eight Dollars and no/100($29,388.00). Payment is due 45 days after receipt and verification of all expenses and invoices related to the trail reconstruction. 3. To Amend Article 6 of the Agreement as follows: 6.2 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES. a. The VRWJPO shall hire any necessary contractors to complete the Project.The VRWJPO shall require the contractor to obtain and maintain adequate insurance consistent with the VRWJPO and City contract policies for the Project and the insurance shall name both the City and the VRWJPO as additional insured and shall be the primary coverage for any claims arising out of the project. b. The Trail Reconstruction shall be an alternative bid item for the Project. c. The VRWJPO and the City shall mutually agree whether to accept the alternate bid for Trail Reconstruction. 4. All other terms of the Agreement and any amendments between the VRWJPO and City shall remain in full force and effect unless otherwise amended or terminated in accordance with law or the terms of the Agreement. 5. In any case where this Amendment conflicts with the earlier Agreement or any amendments thereto,this Amendment shall govern. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] Page 2 of 3 Dakota County Contract#C0028081.1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date(s)indicated below. CITY OF FAR INGTON By , Todd Larson, ayor Date of Signature: By C � 1.1 c/ 21 ^�J', City Clerk Date of Signature: 7 VERMILLION RIVER WATERSHED JOINT POWERS ORGANIZATION APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY, 1r( /s/Helen R. Brosnahan 5/2/17 ike Slavik successor,Chair Assistant Dakota County Attorney Date Date of Signature: 5"aS-I VRW Res. No. 1.1.2,& County Attorney File No. KS-16-238-001 Page 3 of 3 (tikRi,t, City of Farmington y ,Z 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 -.,,,,o"' www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Lena Larson, Municipal Services Coordinator SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation for Pollution Prevention Day from Dakota Electric-Municipal Services DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION Dakota Electric Association has donated$1,000 toward Pollution Prevention Day 2017. DISCUSSION Dakota Electric Association has once again generously donated $1,000 as a sponsor of Pollution Prevention Day. The event will be held in Rambling River Park on Friday, September 15, 2017. Pollution Prevention Day has been held for Farmington students since 1997. Last year approximately 625 fourth graders participated. Staff will communicate the city's appreciation on behalf of the city council to Dakota Electric Association for their support of Pollution Prevention Day. BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution accepting the donation from Dakota Electric Association in the amount of $1,000 for Pollution Prevention Day 2017. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Resolution Resolution RESOLUTION No. R33-17 ACCEPTING DONATION FROM DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION FOR POLLUTION PREVENTION DAY Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said city on the 15th day of May, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Larson, Bartholomay, Craig Members Absent: Bernhj elm, Donnelly Member Bartholomay introduced and Member Craig seconded the following: WHEREAS, Dakota Electric Association has donated $1000 towards Pollution Prevention Day; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the city to accept such donations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city of Farmington hereby accepts the generous donation of$1000 from Dakota Electric Association to be used for Pollution Prevention Day. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 15th day of May 2017. Mayor Attested to the /� ' 4day of May, 2017. y Administrator SEAL City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 'rs 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 -.4 reo,roil' www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Katy Gehler, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Approval Contracts for the Water, Sanitary Sewer, Surface Water and Transportation Plans for 2040 Comp Plan-Engineering DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION Staff is recommending approval of a contract with Bolton and Menk, Inc. to complete the Water Supply and Distribution Plan, Sanitary Sewer Plan, and Transportation Plan. Staff is also recommending approval of a contract with Barr Engineering Company to complete the Surface Water Management Plan. DISCUSSION Minnesota State Statute requires cities in the seven county metropolitan area to have a comprehensive plan and to update that plan every 10 years. A comprehensive plan establishes a vision for the community, serves as a compass or resource guide for the development of the community, and reflects regional policies and important local goals and objectives. The comprehensive plan not only addresses population projections and the land uses to accommodate this growth, but the infrastructure or assets required to support development. Engineering studies for the water, sanitary sewer, surface water and transportation systems are completed to inform the elements included in the Comprehensive Plan. The city contracted with HKGi to assist in updating the land use,housing, sustainability, and economic development elements of the plan as well as compiling and developing the overall plan document. Additionally, HKGi will take the lead in the public engagement aspects which play a key component in developing the plan. The elements that address utilities and transportation involve technical analysis (computer modeling)which the city does not have the resources to perform therefore it was anticipated that consultants would be utilized to complete these studies as well. Separate request for proposals (RFPs)were issued for each plan mid-March and the city received 18 total proposals on April 14, 2017. Four to five proposals were received for each plan, many firms proposing on all four. A review group consisting of city staff was assembled to score and ultimately recommend a firm or firms to assist the city in updating its infrastructure plans. Bolton and Menk's proposals scored the highest for the Water Supply and Distribution Plan, Sanitary Sewer Plan, and Transportation Plan. Barr's proposal scored the highest for the Surface Water Management Plan. These firms were selected by the review group for recommendation to the city council for approval of a contract to assist the city in updating the infrastructure planning documents. BUDGET IMPACT The proposed contract amounts,by plan, are as follows: Water Supply and Distribution Plan $19,570 Sanitary Sewer Plan $33,231 Transportation $28,044 Surface Water Management Plan $39,680 The utility fund budgets;water, sanitary sewer, and storm water; anticipated the need to prepare the planning documents and funds are available to support the contract amounts. Excess proceeds from the Liquor store revenues is recommended to be used to support the preparation of the Transportation Plan. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the attached contracts with Bolton and Menk, Inc. in the amount of$80,845 and Barr Engineering Company in the amount of$39,680 to assist in the preparation of the city's plan updates. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description ❑ Contract BARR Contract ❑ Contract BARR -Exhibit A D Cover Memo BMI Contract D Contract BMI -Exhibit A AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES This Agreement ("Agreement") made this /S44day of May, 2017, between the CITY OF FARMINGTON a municipal corporation ("City"), and BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation ("Consultant"). The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions for the provision of services by Consultant for professional engineering services related to the update of the Surface Water Management Plan hereinafter referred to as the "Work". 1. Scope of Service. The scope of service is detailed in the Proposal submitted by the consultant dated April 14, 2017 and attached as Exhibit A. The terms of this contract shall take precedence over any provisions of the Consultant's proposal and/or general conditions. 2. Term of Contract. All Work under this Contract shall be provided, performed and/or completed by December 31, 2018. The work shall be substantially complete by March 30, 2018. Project Schedules with interim milestones will be developed with the project kick-off meeting. 3. Compensation for Services. City agrees to pay the Consultant on an hourly basis not to exceed $39,680. No claim will be honored for compensation for extra services or beyond the scope of this Agreement or the not-to-exceed price for the services identified in the proposal without written submittal by the Consultant, and approval of an amendment by the City, with specific estimates of type, time and maximum costs, prior to commencement of the work. 4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall prepare and submit to City, on a monthly basis, itemized invoices setting forth work performed under this Contract. Invoices submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City. Invoices to the City and payment to the Consultant by the City shall be subject to Minnesota statutory provisions pertaining to claims, including Minnesota Statutes § 471.38, 471.40, and the Minnesota Prompt Payment Act, M.S. §425.425. 5. Staffing. The Consultant has designated staffing to complete and manage the Work in the proposals attached as Exhibit A. They shall be assisted by other staff members as necessary to facilitate the completion of the Work in accordance with the terms established herein. Consultant may not remove or replace the designated staff without the approval of the City. 6. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence in the performance of its services as is ordinarily exercised by members of the profession under similar circumstances in Dakota County, Minnesota. 7. Insurance. a. General Liability. Consultant shall maintain a general liability insurance policy with limits of at least $1,500,000.00 for each person, and each occurrence, for both personal injury and property damage. Consultant shall provide City with a Certificate of Insurance verifying insurance coverage before providing service to the City. b. Worker's Compensation. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker's Compensation Acts and from 1 claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of Consultant's services under this Contract. 8. Indemnification. Consultant will defend and indemnify City, its officers, agents, and employees and hold them harmless from and against all judgments, claims, damages, costs and expenses, including a reasonable amount as and for its attorney's fees paid, incurred or for which it may be liable resulting from any breach of this Contract by Consultant, its agents, contractors and employees, or any negligent or intentional act or omission performed, taken or not performed or taken by Consultant, its agents, contractors and employees, relative to this Contract. City will indemnify and hold Consultant harmless from and against any loss for injuries or damages arising out of the negligent acts of the City, its officers, agents or employees. 9. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by either party by thirty (30) days' written notice delivered to the other party at the addresses written above. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the Consultant, the Consultant shall be paid for services rendered until the effective date of termination. 10. Independent Contractor. At all times and for all purposes herein, the Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. No statement herein shall be construed so as to find the Consultant an employee of the City. 11. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Contract, the Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, or age. The Consultant shall post in places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this non-discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment. The Consultant further agrees to comply with all aspects of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes 363.01, et. seq., Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 12. Subcontract or Assignment. Consultant shall not subcontract any part of the services to be provided under this Contract; nor may Consultant assign this Contract, or any interest arising herein, without the prior written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractors for all undisputed services provided by subcontractors within ten days of Consultant's receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractors on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractors. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of$100 or more is$10. 13. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. Consultant is responsible for knowing of and abiding by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the type of services provided pursuant to this Contract; including, as applicable, the Minnesota Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 13, as amended, and Minnesota Rules promulgated pursuant to Chapter 13. 14.Audits and Data Practices. The books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Consultant or other parties relevant to this agreement are subject to examination by the City and either Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor for a period of six years after the effective date of this contract. This Contract is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practice Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 (Data Practices Act). All 2 government data, as defined in the Data Practices Act Section 13.02, Subd 7, which is created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant in performing any of the functions of the City during performance of this Contract is subject to the requirements of the Data Practice Act and Consultant shall comply with those requirements as if it were a government entity. All subcontracts entered into by Consultant in relation to this Contract shall contain similar Data Practices Act compliance language. 15.WORK PRODUCT. All materials, including but not limited to reports, exhibits, models, maps, charts, computer data, and supporting documentation produced under work authorized by this Agreement shall become the property of the City upon completion of the work or termination of this Agreement. 16.Conflicts. No salaried officer or employee of the City and no member of the Council, or Commission, or Board of the City shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in this contract. The violation of this provision renders the contract void. Any federal regulations and applicable state statutes shall not be violated. 17. Damages. In the event of a breach of this Contract by the City, Consultant shall not be entitled to recover punitive, special or consequential damages or damages for loss of business. 18.Governing Law. This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 19.Severability. The provisions of this Contract are severable. If any portion hereof is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Contract. 20. Entire Agreement. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Contract supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Contract shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Contract as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF FARMINGTON BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY BY: � BY: .1/L2-yt. Todd Larson, Mayor Its et' , i, f-- AND avid McKnight, inistrator 3 IF ti; r' 'WASi J I. f -0-------r l''''' • < /r .`11..‘" ,i.';';',. s Y5 � C .\F� . d � ` ; Slrt2ir 3v :i `r p y a _ !,,. ti,.. 4 «t ' r 6 Ynl lid fr M,. 1f� - -� . "'• ,. _79. „' �. 71-77� t I , \`\\•n - et a p proposal for surface water management plan update prepared for the City of Farmington submitted by Barr Engineering Co. 1414 , April 14 2017 BARR resourceful. naturally. BARR engineering and environmental consultants April 14, 2017 Katy Gehler, PE City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Re: Request for proposal for surface water management plan update Dear Ms. Gehler: Barr Engineering Co. is pleased to submit our proposal to the City of Farmington for updating your surface water management plan.We understand your desire for a plan that is tailored to your city and provides a roadmap for future water resources management activities and investments. Barr's water resources management and planning expertise—combined with our experience coordinating local and comprehensive plans, and our understanding of your city, the Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Rules 8410, and Minnesota Statutes 1036.235—puts us in the best position to assist the city because our: History of service to Farmington will save time and provide you with trusted, informed service. Through our recent Atlas 14 XP-SWMM modeling and wellhead protection planning work,we have an in- depth knowledge of your city that means we'll be ready to go on day one. Minnesota watershed planning and regional experience results in sound solutions that fit your needs and goals.Your plan needs to be tailored to meet your needs and reflect the city's physical characteristics, challenges, and history. Our experience preparing local (municipal)water management plans and watershed management plans, coupled with our regional knowledge,will allow us to develop a surface water management plan that meets your needs for the next 10 years. Barr knows the Twin Cities metropolitan area and its watersheds, and in particular,we know the watersheds within your city and the characteristics that make them unique.This knowledge enables us to hit the ground running and develop a plan that is customized to meet your unique water resources issues. Innovative thinking will lead to effective,adaptive planning.We have a practical understanding of emerging issues facing those tasked with managing water resources. Our experts have assisted clients in establishing policies, programs, and actions to creatively address issues such as groundwater vulnerability, trout-stream management, and the ability of stormwater infrastructure to handle changing precipitation patterns. Our staff will incorporate science-based solutions into practices feasible for the city to implement to address evolving issues. Familiarity modeling the study area will streamline model result integration.Through hydrologic and hydraulic modeling for Farmington, Barr's experts have a solid understanding of the unique character of your city,the location of stormwater utilities that may need improvement, and important city drainage- system details. Familiarity with these systems and identified issues will contribute to the efficient develop- ment of a stormwater management implementation program tailored to the city's specific needs. Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive,Suite 200,Minneapolis,MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com Katy Gehler April 14,2017 Page 2 Our understanding of state and regional requirements means your plan will be compliant from the start. Few other firms have Barr's level of water management understanding and perspective, or our knowledge of state requirements.We will apply knowledge gained from over 50 years working with cities, watershed management organizations, and industry to help the plan development and approval process proceed smoothly. Wide-ranging expertise with urban-area water management plans and plan updates means you'll get a reliable plan that meets your needs and is completed within the required schedule. We have completed second- and third-generation plan updates for a number of municipalities and watershed organizations across the state, including Inver Grove Heights, Hastings, Red Wing, Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, Minnetonka, North St. Paul, and Willmar, and the Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization, Black Dog Watershed Management Organization, Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission,Valley Branch Watershed District, and Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. Our team includes experts experienced in plan development. We look forward to building our relationship with you as we work together to develop an updated surface water management plan that meets your needs for the next 10 years.If you have questions about our proposal, please feel free to contact me (952-832-2813, kchandler@barr.com) or Erin Anderson Wenz (952-832-2805, eandersonwenz@barr.com). Sincerely, /5f/tI'l r , Karen Chandler, PE Erin Anderson Wenz, PE, ENV SP Vice President, Principal in Charge Project Manager contents goals and objectives 1 background and experience 3 detailed work plan 10 references 16 attachment A: resumes WRO3P069.17 Barr Engineering Co. goals and objectives The City of Farmington seeks to update its 2008 local surface water management plan.The plan will address all areas included in the city's comprehensive plan and any additional service areas identified by the city. Barr Engineering Co. recommends that the city update its plan by taking a disciplined approach that will not only shape and guide water resources management now and in the future, but will also enable the city to meet the requirements of the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organiza- tion (JPO),the Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Rules 8410, and Minnesota Statutes 1036.235.In addition,this approach will inform components of the city's comprehensive plan, which must be updated by the end of 2018. After evaluating the city's current plan, Barr will facilitate the updating process and prepare a revised plan that satisfies regulatory requirements, communicates the city's organizational goals related to water resources management, and provides a roadmap for achieving those goals.The updated plan will inform and guide the city's water resources management decisions and investments into the next decade.We will work closely with you to prioritize implementation of projects that are good invest- ments, address existing challenges, protect water resources, and minimize the risk of future water management problems. Prioritization will include consideration of grant funding, as well as partner- ing and opportunities for joint funding with the JPO and adjacent municipalities. Barr will help you update the plan so that it accurately reflects the city's goals for water resource management and provides direction for achieving those goals through policies, standards, and an implementation program.The process will involve deleting content that is no longer relevant, revising outdated content, and developing fresh content to address new and emerging issues and concepts, such as minimal-impact design standards (MIDS).The updated plan will incorporate the city's current issues and initiatives related to water resources management, including updated Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates and issues identified in the comprehensive plan that involve water resources—for example, increasingly intense rainfall events;impaired waters and total maxi- mum daily loads(TMDLs);surface-water–groundwater interactions;and other considerations from the Vermillion River Watershed's WRAPS(watershed restoration and protection strategy)for areas within the city of Farmington.The implementation program will lay out and prioritize the steps needed to address the issues and initiatives identified in the plan, such as studies and capital improvement projects.We will create a plan summary that will also serve as the surface water chapter in the city's updated comprehensive plan. Barr will leverage its familiarity with the city,the JPO, and metro-area watershed management and trout-stream protection to develop a plan that is consistent with the requirements of the JPO and the Met Council and meets all applicable state and local requirements.We will guide the plan through JPO review and approval, and coordinate with city staff and your comprehensive-plan consultant to complete work on a timeline that aligns with the schedule for the comprehensive plan. Barr Engineering Co. I Page 1 We understand that city staff wish to be involved throughout the process to help shape the plan and help ensure that it's tailored to reflect the city's needs. Our scope of work includes bringing city staff members in at a number of key points in the process.The involvement of city staff, city council members, and the public is detailed in the scope included below. Barr Engineering Co. I Page 2 background and experience Barr integrates engineering and environmental expertise to help clients develop, manage, and restore natural resources. Our 750 engineers, scientists, and technical support specialists serve natural-resources management organizations and municipal, state, and federal agencies, as well as industries.Incorporated as an employee-owned firm in 1966, Barr has offices in Minneapolis, Duluth, and Hibbing, Minnesota;Jefferson City, Missouri;Ann Arbor and Grand Rapids, Michigan; Bismarck, North Dakota;Salt Lake City, Utah;and Calgary,Alberta. More than 100 of our Minneapolis-based engineers and scientists are engaged in water resources engineering and design, stormwater management, wetland management, limnology, and landscape ecology. This breadth and depth of experience allows us to provide innovative solutions to water resources challenges. relevant project experience • Barr has assisted numerous municipalities and watershed management organizations in updating plans, ranging from minor revisions to major overhauls that require extensive modeling efforts. Below are descriptions of several projects that demonstrate our experience with and expertise in water resources management and planning, including local water management plans, MIDS,trout- stream management, and Atlas 14 hydrologic and hydraulic modeling.In addition,we are currently updating water management plans for the cities of Apple Valley, Bloomington, Golden Valley, and Richfield. local water management plans Edina In 2011, Barr updated the comprehensive water resources management plan we'd developed for the city of Edina, which included revising the city's XP-SWMM model to reflect recent development and evaluating stormwater-quality-treatment options for conformance with phosphorus-loading require- ments.We also developed an interactive GIS web application for the city.The plan and modeling tools continue to support the city's efforts to replace aging infrastructure and address flooding and water quality issues. Eau Claire Barr has served the city of Eau Claire,Wisconsin, for more than 25 years. Our work has included preparing detailed hydrologic and hydraulic models for nearly a third of the city, focusing on areas that have experienced chronic flooding and icing problems. Following our recommendations, Eau Claire has implemented projects designed to solve its flooding issues.We are nearing completion of a comprehensive stormwater management plan that identifies storm-sewer infrastructure issues, addresses stormwater management needs in areas to be annexed, and presents stormwater- management and erosion-and sediment-control ordinances.We're also creating a nine-element plan for Half Moon Lake,a key water resource in the city. Barr Engineering Co. j Page 3 Golden Valley Barr worked with Golden Valley to update its surface water management plan to meet the requirements of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, as well as the need to integrate the plan with the city's comprehensive planning efforts.The surface water management plan received WMO approval in 2008;we're currently working with the city on updating the plan. Hastings For more than 40 years, Barr has been the city of Hastings' go-to consultant for stormwater and groundwater infrastructure and management needs.We assisted the city in updating its watershed management plan, which we'd originally prepared in the late 1970s,to meet the requirements of the Vermillion River Watershed JPO and the Lower St.Croix Watershed Management Organization and to incorporate detailed city-wide hydrologic and hydraulic modeling.The plan received WMO approval in 2008. Our work for Hastings has also included preparing a wellhead protection plan. Inver Grove Heights Working with city staff, Barr completed Inver Grove Heights'first comprehensive water resources management plan in 1990.The second generation of that plan, prepared with city staff over a five- year period,was approved by the city council in December 2008.The plan encompassed hydrologic modeling and detailed maps that helped the city visualize the landlocked status of numerous basins. The maps and modeling information became part of the city's comprehensive water resources management plan, which also contained an outline of applicable regulations,goals, and policies;an assessment of problems and issues;and an implementation program.The plan set the course for the city's management of water resources for the next 10 years. Minnetonka Barr has assisted the city of Minnetonka with water and natural-resources planning and engineering since 1982,when we developed its initial stormwater management plan.In the 1990s,we revised that plan to address wetlands protection and management considerations.As part of the new, compre- hensive water resources plan,we revised the hydrologic and hydraulic studies, evaluated existing stormwater facilities, analyzed areas with flooding problems and water quality concerns, and identi- fied impacts on wetlands. This information was used to develop stormwater management criteria for approximately 750 watersheds within the city. In 2010,we updated the city's plan to incorporate regulatory updates and requirements from state agencies and WMOs.Work included developing a strategy to address phosphorous-load reductions and revising the city's stormwater management rules to comply with the rules of the city's four governing WMOs. Recently Barr assessed the vulnerability of Minnetonka's storm sewer system, including performing a GIS analysis to 1) identify ground slopes and soil types, as well as pipe segments with a high likeli- hood of failure due to age, material, and corrosion susceptibility, and 2)assess the consequences of pipe failure, including the potential for roadway inundation and washout, disruption of emergency routes, flooding of critical buildings and infrastructure, and slope failures.We developed a scoring system to identify high-risk storm pipes based on the likelihood of failure, failure consequences, and Barr Engineering Co. I Page 4 combined risk.The city plans to develop a targeted inspection and replacement program based on the results of this analysis. Red Wing Barr helped Red Wing update its surface water management plan to meet the city's needs, including addressing NPDES MS4 permit requirements, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, and water quality modeling. The plan focused on future system improvements; retrofitting of undersized and deteri- orating storm sewers; system maintenance; best management practices (BMPs)for future develop- ment; revisions to the city's stormwater-utility and area-connection-charge requirements; and coor- dination of county, state, and federal regulatory agencies.The plan also addressed water quality enhancements and trout stream issues. St. Louis Park Barr worked with the city of St. Louis Park to update its surface water management plan to meet the requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, as well as its own evolving needs.Work included coordinating with the city's planning staff and attending meetings with watershed district staff.The plan received WMO approval in 2008. minimal impact design standards Inputs (MIDS) and calculator •pm;ect size •Impervious area Minnesota Pollution Control Agency •Soil "°e •Zip code In 2009, the Minnesota Legislature allocated funds to •Choice of stormwaI= develop MIDS performance and design standards and other practice(s) tools for facilitating low-impact and other stormwater management techniques. In the first phase, Barr gathered ) ) information to help the MPCA and diverse stakeholder groups decide on performance goals that best mimicked natural hydrology for a variety of site types, as well as volume and pollutant reductions that could be achieved through BMPs. We also led discussions with stakeholder groups and __ provided them with information needed to make voluntary statewide stormwater-management policy decisions. We evaluated the pros and cons of more than two dozen BMPs Output and defined BMP volume- and pollutant-reduction credits. •��m.vophosphoms,ater volume, oandtotaltal s, cissdved phosphorus,and total suspended solids removed by practice(s) Barr also developed a MIDS calculator that quantified the •Whether project design achieves required runoff-treatment volume for a given site and let crl‘.-fmance to performance goal users select BMPs that resulted in the desired runoff volumes,total phosphorus, and total suspended solids. In addition, we provided hands-on training to designers and municipal and watershed regulators for using the calculator, and prepared a MIDS project addendum to the MPCA's Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Barr Engineering Co. I Page 5 Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission's (BCWMC) 2015 watershed management plan requires all stormwater to be treated in accordance with the MPCA's MIDS performance goal for new development, redevelopment, and linear projects. As engineers for the BCWMC, Barr reviews developments and other project proposals to ensure stormwater is treated in accordance with the MIDS performance goals. Through our involvement in the development of the MIDS performance goals, our development of the MIDS calculator, and our experience performing MIDS-related reviews for the BCWMC, we understand the strengths and limitations of MIDS. trout-stream watershed comprehensive plan and stormwater ordinance Northfield Barr managed the development of a comprehensive trout-stream watershed plan and stormwater ordinance for the city of Northfield.The project included a long research phase that allowed significant engagement of concerned citizens. We translated the regulatory and technical information into language that all readers could understand, providing a framework for community discussion and decision-making. The policy plan was designed as a dynamic, open-source document to enable regional collaboration.The stormwater ordinance included a variety of performance standards for different watersheds and addressed the expanded-discharges requirement of the city's NPDES MS4 permit. hydrologic and hydraulic modeling for municipal stormwater system Lakeville and Farmington The Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization hired Barr to pre- •' pare a calibrated XP-SWMM model of the = rr; , approximately 225-square-mile water- J shed, which covers parts of 19 different i �rw • to cities and townships. Completed in 2009, the model provides the JPO with a tool a--• for regulating stormwater runoff from future developments by predicting how ' development or land-use changes would influence flows in the Vermillion River. _ The calibrated and validated model was also used to determine allowable flow """ I - .� rates (standards) for the Vermillion River `, NE- NE.. and its tributaries as they cross commu- Spatially and temporally distributed precipitation data nity boundaries at over 60 locations. are critical elements of the Vermillion River watershed hydrologic model In 2011, Barr updated the XP-SWMM model to include municipal stormwater conveyance systems for the North Creek sub-watershed in the cities of Lakeville and Farmington. The updated model provides both cities with a tool for both Barr Engineering Co. I Page 6 verifying that future development complies with JPO requirements and evaluating how development will affect existing infrastructure. In 2014, we updated the model for the entire watershed to incorporate the Atlas 14 rainfall frequency estimates and new storm distributions.The model also reflected significant revisions to the South Creek and Middle Creek sub-watersheds in Lakeville and Farmington. The following year we modeled portions of the city of Rosemount to quantify peak discharge rates and volumes tributary to the Vermillion River system. Integrating the municipal stormwater system with the larger watershed model allowed the JPO and the cities under its authority to be confident that model results were technically sound and accept- able for use in regulating rate and discharge standards for community boundaries. Barr Engineering Ca. I Page 7 9 key team members Erin Anderson Wenz will serve as Barr's project manager. In this role, she will lead the plan update process, coordinating with city and Barr staff to complete the scope of work within the proposed schedule and budget. Her proven success in developing unique planning processes and documents to meet specific project needs will facilitate development of a plan customized to your needs. Erin will be the main point of contact with city staff. Karen Chandler will serve as Barr's principal in charge. Her responsibilities provide project oversight and verifying that the project is executed as proposed and the city's expectations are understood and met throughout the entire project. She will also serve as a technical advisor, sharing her expertise in local and water management organization-based surface water management planning. Greg Fransen will write the plan. His familiarity with the watershed, gained by constructing the city's XP-SWMM model, will allow him to identify opportunities for improving the existing systems. Greg will draw on his experience planning and writing grants for the city of Inver Grove Heights to provide a thorough and complete SWMP document that meets the city's existing and future needs. Brandon Barnes will serve as a project advisor and technical resource.As the developer of the JPO's original XP-SWMM model and manager of the city's XP-SWMM updates, he will work with team members to incorporate the modeling results into the inventory and implementation sections of the city's plan. Additional information on qualifications and experience for these key project team members is pro- vided below. Full resumes are included in an attachment to this proposal. Other Barr water resources staff members will also be available to provide input and guidance as part of the city's plan update. Karen Chandler, PE Vice President, Senior Water Resources Engineer MS, Civil Engineering Karen has 30 years of experience with water resources management, stormwater and watershed management planning,and hydrology and hydraulic analyses.She oversees hydrologic, hydraulic,and water quality analyses and the design and construction of stormwater projects, as well as assisting clients with community relations. Karen is currently overseeing development of Apple Valley's, Bloomington's, and Golden Valley's surface water management plan updates.She has also led the development of water Principal in charge resources management plans for the cities of Eau Claire,Golden Valley, Hastings,Inver Grove Heights, Minnetonka, Northfield,St. Louis Park,and Willmar.In addition, Karen's experience includes preparing and updating plans for the Black Dog Watershed Management Organization,Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization, Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission,Valley Branch Watershed District, Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District,and Cedar River Watershed District. Barr Engineering Co. ( Page 8 Erin Anderson Wenz, PE, ENV SP Ik Senior Water Resources Engineer MS, Environmental Engineering and Science Erin has nearly two decades of experience with projects involving watershed manage- ment, including stormwater and lakewater quality modeling for municipalities and it watershed districts.She develops stormwater management plans and designs and ��� constructs low-impact development features for retrofit sites of all sizes.She has also directed strategic lake management plans and TMDL studies for several metro-area lakes, including development of a watershed restoration and protection strategy Project manager (WRAPS) report for the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District and an update to the district's watershed management plan.In addition, Erin managed development of stormwater management plans for the city of Willmar and for Duluth's Miller Hill Mall.She is currently managing an update to the city of Bloomington's stormwater management plan. Greg Fransen Water Resources Scientist MS, Natural Resource Science and Management 43 • Greg has over 27 years of experience,with over seven years focused on water resource k ''� projects and hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. He has developed XP-SWMM models for several Minnesota cities and watersheds, including the city of Farmington's updates for the Vermillion River Watershed JPO,and has modeled stormwater infrastructure improvements for the Minnesota Department of Transportation.Greg also reviews . stormwater plans for new development and redevelopment projects for metro cities. Plan writer Brandon Barnes, PE Water Resources Engineer BS, Civil Engineering Brandon has a decade of experience with water resources.He creates detailed hydro- logic and hydraulic models, integrates GIS with floodplain studies, performs interior drainage analyses,and addresses public concerns.Brandon developed an XP-SWMM model for the Vermillion River Watershed JPO and updated hydrologic and hydraulic models for the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District to incorporate Atlas 14 rainfall depths.He also developed XP-SWMM models for the Airport South Drainage Technical resource District in Bloomington,the Central City stormwater tunnel drainage area in Minne- apolis,and the Shell Rock River watershed in southern Minnesota. detailed work plan work tasks Barr will assist the city in updating the plan to 1) meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Rules 8410, and Minnesota Statutes 1036.235;2) satisfy requirements of the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (JPO);and 3) provide meaningful direction and justifi- cation for city water resources management actions for the next 10 years. For the purposes of this proposal and project execution, we have subdivided this work plan into the following tasks: 1. project kick-off and information gathering 2. development of draft plan 3. plan review, revision, and adoption task 1: project kick-off and information gathering To begin the plan update process, Barr will review the 2008 plan in detail to identify content to be updated, content that is absent but should be included, content that can be consolidated to remove redundancy, and content that is no longer relevant can be omitted.We will review the plan in light of existing regulatory documents (e.g., NPDES MS4 permit), current data sets, and our knowledge of emerging issues.We'll generate a list of critical data gaps, updates, and additions that require direction or input from the city, and participate in a project kick-off meeting with key city staff to clarify the goals of the project, review data gaps, and obtain direction for issues identified in our plan review.We assume that the kick-off meeting will include discussion of potential updates to city performance standards(e.g., adopting MIDS).At the meeting, we'll confirm project schedule and deliverables,with consideration of timelines for the city's comprehensive plan update. In addition, Barr staff will attend two community outreach and engagement meetings and assist in developing questions for use in the online community input tool. task 2: development of the draff plan After the kick-off meeting and the first set of community outreach and engagement activities, Barr will begin developing a draft of the plan.We anticipate frequent telephone and electronic communi- cation with city staff during Task 2, as well as two meetings to obtain the city's feedback on interim draft sections of the plan.We assume the city will provide an editable electronic copy of the 2008 plan.We will use content from the 2008 plan and, if applicable, relevant content we have developed for other plans,to promote efficiency and focus resources on activities requiring the most effort, including revising goals and policies, identifying problems and solutions, and defining the imple- mentation program. The following are the types of changes expected for each section of the plan (presented in the order in which they appear in the existing plan;the organization of the plan may change during updating): Barr Engineering Co. I Page 10 • Executive Summary:The executive summary will require minor revisions to reflect the changes made to the subsequent sections. • Section 1—Introduction and Purpose:This section will be revised to reflect the drivers for the current plan update, updated water resource-related agreements, and cooperative partners. • Section 2—Land and Water Resource Inventory:Barr will update the text, tables, and figures of this section to reflect the most recent available natural resources data. Key updates will include updated climate data (i.e.,Atlas 14), updated hydrologic soil classifications,and 2016 impaired waters.The proposed scope of work does not include any new modeling.We will include results of recently completed hydrologic and hydraulic(H&H) modeling, which will replace the information found in Appendix B of the current plan. Barr performed the H&H modeling,which will allow for seamless integration of the methods, results, and proposed actions into section 2 and other relevant sections of the plan (e.g., assessment of problems, implementation priorities).We will update section 2 figures to reflect current, publicly available GIS data and infrastructure data provided by the city. • Section 3—Current Assessment:This section will require updates to reflect the city's progress in addressing existing issues and the emergence of new issues. Barr will include information about increased rainfall amounts, storm intensities, and issues identified by modeling results. We'll rely on city staff to provide information about current local issues (e.g., localized flood- ing).We will work with city staff to clarify vague actions and/or reference programs or actions in the city's implementation programs. Updates to section 3 will require communication and feedback from city staff;we will attend one meeting with the city to review and receive feedback on an intermediate draft of plan content related to problems, corrective actions, and the city's implementation program (sections 4 and 5 in the current plan). • Section 4—Goals, Policies and Actions:New and/or revised goals and policies will be needed to reflect 1) updated requirements for cities included in the JPO plan adopted in 2016; 2) new and revised regulatory programs(e.g., updated NPDES MS4 requirements); 3) new and suggested changes to city requirements and performance standards;and 4) emerging issues, including those identified during the comprehensive planning process that are brought to our attention.We will work with city staff to develop goals and policies that provide meaning- ful direction for the city without duplicating the efforts of WMOs, state agencies, or others. Barr will assist the city in identifying methods and measures to address emerging issues (e.g., groundwater–surface-water interaction,trout stream management, aquatic invasive species, ability of stormwater infrastructure to handle changing precipitation patterns)that are appropriate to the city's desired level of effort.We will revisit the city's existing performance standards to determine if revisions are needed. Updating section 4 will be a collaborative effort and require significant input from city staff.We will seek initial input regarding these issues at the kick-off meeting and attend one meeting (described under section 3 above) with city staff to review and receive feedback on an intermediate draft of goals and policies prior to compiling a complete draft plan. • Section 5—Implementation Priorities/Program:Barr will revise this section to reflect changes in city operations and programs and coordination with other city programs(e.g., parks, transportation).We will work with city staff to identify tasks to address problems defined in section 5 and document the process the city uses to prioritize projects.We'll update the Barr Engineering Co. I Page 11 implementation tables (Appendix C of the current plan)with input from city staff. Prioritization will include consideration of grant funding, as well as partnering and opportunities for joint funding with the JPO and adjacent municipalities. Updates to section 5 will be closely related to the corrective actions identified in section 4 and will require significant input from city staff(including one meeting with the city to review and receive feedback on an intermediate draft). • Section 6—Administration:Barr will update this section to reflect the city's current stormwater management funding mechanisms, including any changes to the city's stormwater utility, and projected expenses based on the city's updated implementation program (section 5). • Section 7—References:We will revise this section based on the revised content in sections 1 through 6 of the updated plan. • Appendices:We will revise the appendices to reflect updated H&H modeling, capital improvements, and land-use data. In completing task 2, we assume ongoing electronic and telephone communication with city staff as needed.As noted above,we also assume one meeting with city staff to review an interim draft of content related to goals, policies and actions, and a second meeting to review an interim draft of content related to implementation priorities and program priorities (section 5 of the document). Following these meetings, Barr will compile a complete draft plan in electronic format(PDF) and provide the draft plan to the city's project manager to distribute for review by appropriate city staff, the city council, and the public(if so desired)ahead of the planning commission meeting and council workshop included in task 3. Task 3: plan review, revision, and adoption Task 3 includes internal (city)and external (JPO and Met Council) review of the draft plan, revisions to the plan based on that feedback, adoption of the plan by the city council, and provision of content for the city's comprehensive plan. In sequence, Barr will: • Attend a planning commission meeting to present the draft plan and receive feedback. • Attend a council workshop to present the draft plan and receive feedback from the city council. • Attend one meeting (the third of three staff meetings)with city staff to discuss additional city staff feedback on the complete draft plan provided in task 2, along with feedback received at the planning commission meeting and city council work session.We will revise the draft plan based on discussion with city staff. • Submit a revised draft plan, in electronic format,to the JPO for official 60-day review.We will also submit the draft plan to the Met Council for a concurrent 45-day review(the Met Council will provide review comments to the JPO). • Organize comments received during the 60-day review in a spreadsheet and develop proposed responses and/or plan revisions in response to the comments.We will include this information in a spreadsheet provided to the city's project manager. • Discuss the comments and proposed responses and revisions in a conference call with the city's project manager. Based on this feedback, we will summarize the responses to Barr Engineering Co. I Page 12 comments in a memorandum to the JPO.We will revise the plan per the response-to- comments memo to the JPO and submit the final plan and memorandum to the JPO for review and approval. • Following approval of the city's plan by the JPO, present(or assist city staff in presenting)the final plan at a planning commission public hearing and at a city council meeting for adoption. • Provide a final plan in electronic format(PDF and supporting Microsoft Office documents) to city staff. Our cost estimate includes production of three printed copies of the final plan (two for the city and one for Barr). • Provide necessary comprehensive plan content(text, tables, and figures)to the city in electronic format for inclusion in the city's comprehensive plan update.As stated in the city's April 3 email communication, it is anticipated that the comprehensive plan chapter will be in the form of the executive summary in the stand-alone stormwater management plan document. This scope and associated cost assume two JPO meetings to obtain approval of the plan;the first will likely result in comments that the city will need to address in a revised draft of the plan that the JPO will approve at its subsequent meeting.Additional review cycles, although not anticipated, will increase the cost and length of Task 3.If the JPO approves the plan without requiring a response to comments or plan resubmittal, it may lower the associated costs.It is assumed that Barr staff will not attend the JPO meetings; however, if the city desires, attendance can be negotiated as an addition to this scope of work. schedule The plan update will be performed in a manner that promotes efficiency and consistent progress while considering the timeline of the city's comprehensive plan update and other coordinated city projects.The proposed project timeline shown in the table was developed by working backward from a target completion date of March 30, 2018, as required by the city's RFP. Our schedule assumes that the target completion date is when we will supply the necessary text to be incorporated into the comprehensive plan;our schedule also assumes that JPO and city council approval are obtained by the same target completion date. Barr Engineering Co. I Page 13 task est.completion date 1.0 Project Kickoff and Information Gathering May-July 2017 Review of Existing Plan May 2017 Kickoff Meeting May 2017 Community Outreach and Engagement Meetings and Provision of First meeting:late May Questions for Online Community Input Tool 2017 Second meeting:fall 2017 2.0 Development of Draft Plan June-October,2017 Staff Meeting 1:Goals, Policies and Actions June 2017 Staff Meeting 2:Implementation Priorities/Program August 2017 Draft Plan Submitted to City Staff October 2017 3.0 Plan Review, Revisions and Adoption November 2017- March 2018 Planning Commission Meeting October 2017 Council Workshop November 2017 Staff Meeting 3:Preparing the Plan for Vermillion River Watershed JPO November 2017 Review Vermillion River Watershed JPO Review and Revisions December 2017- February 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing March 2018 City Council Meeting for Plan Adoption March 2018 Provide Chapter/Information for Comprehensive Plan March 30,2018 budget A detailed breakdown of hours and costs by staff,task, and subtask is included on the following page.The total estimated cost to complete the project is $39,680.The costs included in the table below reflect the assumptions described in the scope and schedule, and include all associated material expenses(e.g., printing). Barr Engineering Co. ( Page 14 Table 2:Cost Estimate to Update the City of Farmington's Surface Water Management Plan Project Name:Farmington Surface Water Management Plan Update Client Name:City Farmington BARRDate:4/13/2017 - Approved by:Karen Chandler Name(Last,First) .. Anderson W mip,Patrick W iborg,Victona Initials KLC EIA GDF BIB RC52 PEB VWW Billing Rate $170.00 $160.00 $115.00 $130.00 370.00 $90.00 $95.00 Subtotal Subtotal Sub Project Percentage of Project Role Principal Project Manager I Plan Writer Technical Resource 015 Specialist Cost Estimator Administrative Assistant Hours Labor Expenses Contractors Contingency% Tots] Total Task 1-Project Kickoff and Information Gathering Plan Review 2 8 2 12 $ 1,380.00 $ - 5 1,380.00 Kickoff Mtg 5 5 919 _ $2,685.00 0 27.00 $ - $ 2,712.00 Neighborhood Mtg al 5 5 $ 800.00 $ 27.00 $ - $ 827.00 Neighborhood Mtg 02 5 5 $ 800.00 $ 27.00 $ - $ 827.00 Prepare Online Input Tool questions for Planning Consultant _ 1 a 5 $ 620.00 $ - $ 620.00 1 Project Management 1 2 4 $ 485.00 $ - $ 485.00 Subtotal 5 19 25 0 2 0 1 50 $6,770.00 $ 81.00 $ - $ - $ 6,851.00 17.3% Task 2-Development of Draft Plan Executive Summary 1 3 6 _ 10 $1,340.00 $ - $ 1,340.00 Introduction and Purpose 1 8 9_._ .__ _ $ 1,080.00 $ - $ 1,080.00 Land and Water Resource Inventory _ 2 8 10 $ 1,240.00 $ - $ 1,240.00 Current Assessment 2 810 $ 1.240.00 $ - $ 1,240.00 Goals,Policies,and Actions 2 _ 6 32 40 $4,980.001 5 - $ 4,980.00 Implementation Priorities/Program 2 10 16 4 _ 8 40 $5,020.00 $ - $ 5,020.00 Administration 1 2 8 _ _- 11 $ 1,410.00 5 - $ 1,410.00 References 1 2 3 $ 390.00 $ - $ 390.00 Maps 2 4 In 24 $2,040.00 $ - $ 2,040.00 Staff Mtg IN:Discuss' ____ _ 5 8 13 $ 1,720.00 $ 27.00 $ - $ 1,747.00 Staff Mtg 82:Discuss Pr•:..,: �;- 5 8 _ 13 $ 1,720.00 $ 27.00 $ - $ 1,747.00 Project Management 1 2 2 5 $ 580.00 $ S 580.00 Subtotal 6 40 110 4 18 b 2 188 $22,760.00 $ 54.00 $ - $ - $22,814.00 57.5% Task 3-Plan Review,Revisions,and Adoption Planning Commission Mtg 5 9 14 $ 1,835.00 $ 27.00 $ - $ 1,862.00 Council Workshop 5 5 _ 10 $ 1,650.00 $ 27.00 $ - $ 1,677.00 Staff Mtg83:Preparing the SWMP for VRW2PO Review 5 8 13 $1,720.00 $ 27.00 $ - $ 1,747.00 VRWIPO Review and Revisions1 2 6 9 $1,180.00 $ - $ 1,180.00 Planning Commission Public Hearing _ 5 5 $ 800.00 $ 27.00 $ - $ 827.00 City Council Mtg for Plan Adoption 5 5 5 800.00 $ 27.00 $ - $ 827.00 ProvideChapter/Information for Comprehensive Plan _ _ 1 1 4 6 $ 790.00 $ - $ 790.00 Print Three(31 Hard Copies of SWMP 2 _ 2 $ 230.00 $ 600.00 $ - $ 830.00 Project Management 1 1 2 5 275.00 5 - $ 275.00 Subtotal 7 29 30 0 0 0 0 66 $9,280.00 $ 735.00 5 - $ - $10,015.00 252% Project Subtotal 18 88 j 163 4 20 I 8 3 304 538,810.00 $ 870.00 $ - $ - 5 39,680.00 Contingency% Project Total $39,680.00 Assumptions: orange shading Indicates meeting with Ctty project staff yellow shading indicates meeting with project cooperators references References for whom Barr has completed water plans are listed below.All reference cities have populations of more than 10,000 people. City of Edina City of Minnetonka Jesse Struve(now with City of Brooklyn Park) Liz Stout(now with City of Minneapolis) 763-493-8114 952-939-8233 jesse.struve@brooklynpark.org elizabeth.stout@minneapolismn.gov Ross Bintner Tom Dietrich 952-903-5713 952-939-8233 rbintner@edinamn.gov tdietrich@eminnetonka.com City of Eau Claire City of Red Wing Dave Solberg Bob Stark 715-839-4934 651-385-5112 dave.solberg@eauclairewi.gov bob.stark@ci.red-wing.mn.us City of Golden Valley City of St. Louis Park Jeff Oliver Scott Brink(former city engineer) 763-593-8034 303-235-2860 joliver@goldenvalleymn.gov sbrink@ci.wheatridge.co.us City of Hastings City of Northfield Nick Egger Katy Gehler(former city engineer) 651-480-2370 651-280-6841 nickegger@hastingsmn.gov kgehler@ci.farmington.mn.us Barr Engineering Co. Page 16 resumes KAREN CHANDLER, PE Vice President, Senior Water Resources Engineer BARR Experience Karen Chandler has 30 years of experience in water resources management and planning. A major focus of her work has been developing and implementing stormwater and watershed management plans for cities and watershed organizations. Her experience also includes overseeing hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality analyses and the design and construction of stormwater projects;assisting with community relations and public presentations;and facilitating public processes. Karen's background includes: • Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District—Facilitating the early process for updating the district's watershed management plan, including developing and assisting staff in implementing a stakeholder engagement process. • City of Inver Grove Heights—Leading the team that prepared the second-generation water resources management plan, approved in 2008.Worked with the city on updating its stormwater and wetland management ordinances. Provide assistance to city staff regarding analysis of stormwater management impacts of proposed projects. Managed development of the previous comprehensive water resources management plan. • City of Bloomington—Overseeing the development of the city's updated surface water management plan, including integration with the city's comprehensive planning effort. • Cities of Minnetonka, Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, Hastings, and North St. Paul— Leading the teams that worked with each city to update local water management plans, including integration with the cities' comprehensive planning efforts. Currently working with the City of Golden Valley on updating its local water management plan. • City of Minneapolis—Leading development of a stormwater and sanitary sewer infrastructure construction process and requirements guide.The project included preparing groundwater discharge(dewatering) requirements. • City of St. Louis Park—Leading development of a stormwater management plan for the watershed area tributary to the Beltline LRT Station project area, in anticipation of expected redevelopment. • City of Eau Claire—Leading development of a stormwater management plan to identify infrastructure issues, address future development stormwater management needs, and develop stormwater management, erosion, sediment control ordinances. • City of Willmar—Leading development of the watershed management plan.Also assisted in preparation of the city's previous watershed management plan. • City of Northfield—Assisting with the development of a comprehensive trout-stream watershed plan and stormwater ordinance.The project included a substantial research phase that supported significant engagement of concerned citizens.Work included preparation of technical documents and involvement in technical steering committee meetings. • City of Golden Valley—Leading development of a long-term flood mitigation plan to address flooding issues in an intercommunity watershed, including identifying and Barr Engineering Company KAREN CHANDLER continued BARR analyzing flood mitigation alternatives, performing a cost-benefit analysis,and developing cost-share scenarios.Involved significant stakeholder engagement. Leading design and construction project to install a floating water baffle in Schaper Pond to improve water quality treatment and reduce phosphorus loading to Sweeney Lake, an impaired water. • City of Crystal—Leading design and construction project to remove accumulated sediment from Gaulke Pond, including permitting and sediment sampling. • Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission—Providing ongoing services to the commission as their engineer, including managing review of Commission capital improvement projects,assisting with/managing projects, attending Commission and TAC meetings, overseeing updates to the watershed management plan, overseeing development reviews(including review against MIDS), and updating/revising development review standards. • Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District—Facilitating the early process for updating the district's watershed management plan,which included a broad stakeholder engagement process. Led the development of the current watershed management plan,approved in 2007. • Valley Branch Watershed District—Overseeing the development of the updated watershed management plan, approved in 2015,which included facilitating a stakeholder engagement process, developing goals and policies, updating background information, and developing the plan document. • Black Dog Watershed Management Organization—Providing ongoing services to the commission as their engineer, including overseeing the team that performs water quality and habitat monitoring work for the WMO's five strategic water resources, and preparing the WMO's annual report and newsletter. Led the team that updated the WMO's watershed management plan, approved in 2012. • Shell Rock River Watershed District—Assisting in the development of a stormwater management plan for the City of Albert Lea and its watershed. Responsibilities included managing the preparation of the surface-water management plan document that integrated city and watershed district requirements. • Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization/Dakota County—Assisting the organization in completing its watershed management plan, approved in 2005.As part of assisting the JPO in its effort to help local units of government develop their plans,facilitated workshops and meetings with local units of government. Education MS, Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 1987 BS, Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 1982 Registration Professional Civil Engineer: Minnesota,Wisconsin Barr Engineering Company ERIN ANDERSON WENZ, PE, ENV SP Senior Water Resources Engineer BARR immisom Experience Erin Anderson Wenz has nearly 20 years of experience working on projects involving watershed management, including both stormwater and lake water quality modeling for municipalities and watershed districts. She creates stormwater management plans and designs and constructs low-impact development features such as rain gardens, porous pavement, and tree trenches for both large and small retrofit sites. She has also managed strategic lake management plans as well as total maximum daily load (TMDL)studies for several Minnesota lakes. Erin is trained in applying the EnvisionTM Sustainable Infrastructure Rating System to projects. Her experience at Barr includes: ■ Managing the creation of a Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) report for the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District(RWMWD)that includes four TMDL reports(Wakefield and Bennett lakes, Battle and Fish creeks), restoration and protection plans (for Emily, Owasso,Wabasso, Snail, Carver, Beaver, Keller, and Battle Creek lakes)as well as an update to the district's watershed management plan. Work is being done through a watershed-wide TMDL grant from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Also involved a series of stakeholder involvement meetings to explain the process, solicit input from the public, and disseminate information. ■ Managing creation of a stormwater management plan for Miller Hill Mall in Duluth, Minnesota, for the South St. Louis Soil and Water Conservation District.This project involves designing green infrastructure features across a 50-acre parking lot that can lower the temperature of stormwater runoff to Miller Creek,which is currently impaired for brook trout habitat.This project also includes facilitation of stakeholder involvement, bringing together mall management representatives and agency representatives to brainstorm ideas for implementation and funding. ■ Evaluating the"triple bottom line"(environmental, social and economic) differences between two Northwood Lake stormwater improvement project options (water reuse system vs. stormwater pond) for the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. Both options were scored using the EnvisionTM' rating system.In addition, a screening-level life cycle analysis (LCA)of each option was performed using GaBiTM software.This information was used in helping guide the managers'decision as to whether to help fund the water reuse project option, which was more expensive, but was ultimately the chosen option. • Managing the creation of a stormwater feasibility study for the Lafayette Park Campus in St. Paul, Minnesota,for the Capitol Region Watershed District and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.Involves designing green infrastructure features that can be retrofit into a corporate site that is a former rail yard and warehouse district. • Managing two projects aimed at developing partnerships between the RWMWD and commercial and school properties within the district. The goal of this project was to find 10 commercial and school sites that were willing to partner with the district in retrofitting rain gardens on their sites.The project was successful in finding these sites and in establishing a way to develop both public-private partnerships as well as cross- disciplinary public partnerships to achieve water quality goals through green infrastructure implementation. • Managing a project at Maplewood Mall that involved the design and construction of low-impact development features such as rain gardens, porous pavement, 200 trees Barr Engineering Company ERIN ANDERSON WENZ continued BARR planted in tree trenches (STTeMS)as well as public education features(art and interpretive signage) across a 35-acre parking lot for the RWMWD.This project has been presented at many local conferences and won "Project of the Year"at the 2012 Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts conference. The project also won a 2012 "Grand Award"at the Minnesota Chapter's American Consulting Engineer's Council annual event. • Assisting in the design and construction of an innovative iron-enhanced sand filter and a spent lime filter that treat stormwater runoff for the RWMWD • Creating a detailed XP-SWMM model to simulate a chain of several lakes that drain into the I-94 MnDOT storm sewer system to evaluate the potential impact of creating an outlet for Down's Lake(Lake Elmo, Minnesota)to mitigate recurrent flooding problems for the Valley Branch Watershed District. • Assisting in creating a stormwater management plan for the city of Willmar, Minnesota, by evaluating the capacity of the city's storm-sewer and ditch system under the impacts of proposed land developments. Created an extensive XP-SWMM model of the storm sewer system to evaluate areas of concern and to determine potential solutions. • Performing a literature review for the Minnesota Urban Small Sites BMP Manual for Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. Compiled the results of the literature review into fact sheets, outlining design recommendations, advantages, and limitations. Best management practices include infiltration basins,wet ponds, extended detention basins, rainwater gardens, and permeable weirs. • Managing a TMDL analysis of Kohlman Lake in Maplewood, Minnesota,for the RWMWD.This project involved working with the MPCA on behalf of the district to complete the Kohlman Lake TMDL report and the Kohlman Lake TMDL implementation plan that were approved in May 2010. • Managing a strategic lake management plan (SLMP)for the four lakes(Kohlman, Gervais, Keller, and Phalen) in the Phalen Chain and for Beaver Lake, all in Maplewood and St. Paul, Minnesota.This project was presented at the University of Minnesota's Water 2004 Conference in March 2004. • Performing water quality modeling of the Lake Ann and Lake Lucy watershed for the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District using P8 and ArcView to generate information.Also performed in-lake water quality modeling to determine the annual total phosphorus loads to the lakes and their resulting concentrations in the lakes. • Performing water quality modeling of the Carver Lake watershed using P8 and in-lake water quality modeling to determine the annual total phosphorus loads to the lake and the resulting concentrations for the RWMWD. Education MS, Environmental Engineering and Science, University of Washington, 1997 BS, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1995 Registration Professional Engineer: Minnesota Certification Envision" Sustainability Professional,Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure Barr Engineering Company GREG FRANSEN Water Resources Scientist BARR Experience Greg Fransen has more than 25 years of experience in life sciences and a bachelor's degree in biology. He completed his master's degree in natural resource science and management with an emphasis on hydrology and water quality management in 2012. His experience includes: • Developing a stormwater facility grant application for the City of Inver Grove Heights. Performed water quality simulations using P8 model, performed planning-level cost estimates for projects,and summarized results in a stormwater project plan for submission to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. • Conducting development plan stormwater reviews for the City of Inver Grove Heights. Reviewed construction plans, hydrologic and hydraulic models, and water quality models to verify compliance with the city's stormwater ordinance. • Performing hydrologic and hydraulic modeling for the cities of Farmington and Lakeville. Used XP-SWMM to simulate runoff, storm sewers, and stormwater ponds and evaluated the downstream impacts on the Vermillion River. • Performing hydrologic and hydraulic modeling for the City of Minneapolis. Used XP-SWMM and ITM models to simulate rainfall events that caused hazardous surcharging in a stormwater tunnel system. • Performing a flood mitigation study for a portion of Interstate 90 near Austin, Minnesota. Used XP-SWMM and HEC-HMS models to simulate existing conditions and evaluate alternatives for reducing flooding frequency and duration. • Performing a flood damage reduction study for the Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District. Used PC-SWMM model to simulate the 2014 spring-summer flooding event at Prior Lake and to evaluate alternatives for reducing flood impacts during future events. • Performing modeling to update 100-year flood profiles for Nine Mile Creek. Updated an existing XP-SWMM model to include updated hydraulic structure data and Atlas 14 rainfall depths, and performed hydrologic and hydraulic simulations to determine flood elevations and identify problem areas. • Leading a multi-disciplinary team participating in the design of a flood control impoundment and bypass channel in the Bois de Sioux Watershed District. Coordinated geotechnical engineering, hydraulic engineering, and wetland mitigation services for the project. • Working on a project to design a spent lime phosphorus-removal system in the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District. Used XP-SWMM and P8 models to simulate the impacts of alternative designs on hydrology and phosphorus removal. • Working on an evaluation of the Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates. Used XP-SWMM models to estimate the impacts of new rainfall depths and temporal storm distributions on storm sewer system capacity and street flooding. • Monitoring stormwater pond efficiency in the Bassett Creek watershed.Work included flow measurement,stormwater sampling for phosphorus, and particle size analysis of suspended sediment. Barr Engineering and Environmental Science Canada Ltd GREG FRANSEN continued BARR ■ Working on a total maximum daily load (TMDL) study for nutrient,turbidity, and pH impairments in the Cedar River Basin. ■ Completing a draft TMDL implementation plan for the Shell Rock River Watershed District. Education MS, Natural Resource Science and Management(emphasis: hydrology), University of Minnesota, 2012 BS, Biology, University of Minnesota, 1986 Barr Engineering Company BRANDON J. BARNES, PE Water Resources Engineer BARR Experience Brandon Barnes has 10 years of experience in water resources.At Barr, his services include creating detailed hydrologic and hydraulic(H&H) models, integrating geographic information systems (GIS)with floodplain studies, performing interior drainage analyses, developing plans and specifications, observing construction of water resources improvements, and addressing public concerns. Brandon's project work includes: • Developing a detailed XP-SWMM model for the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization to establish flow standards at municipal boundaries throughout the 335 square miles of the Vermillion River watershed. • Developing XP-SWMM models for the Airport South Drainage District in Bloomington, Minnesota;the Central City stormwater tunnel drainage area in Minneapolis;and the Shell Rock River watershed in southern Minnesota. Used ArcView to assemble data, including storm sewer, manholes, and ponds. Exported data from ArcView into XP- SWMM to ensure a matching coordinate system with city GIS data. • Updating H&H models for Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District to incorporate Atlas 14 rainfall depths. Following updates to the model, led discussions with cities within the watershed district to communicate the impacts that the revised rainfall depths had on the 100-year inundation areas within each city. • Using ArcGIS to complete a detailed analysis of the impervious area within the city of Minnetonka. Completed percent impervious calculations on a neighborhood scale and reported based on land use. • Designing and optimizing performance of hydraulic structures during the feasibility study for the proposed Fargo-Moorhead flood diversion project. • Evaluating the velocity distribution using two-dimensional models at proposed hydraulic structures as part of the Fargo-Moorhead flood diversion project feasibility study. Modeling results were used to evaluate the feasibility of fish passage at the proposed structures and presented to permitting agencies. • Developing a HEC-RAS unsteady flow model for the Mouse/Souris River watershed within North Dakota for approximately 400 river miles for the Mouse River enhanced flood protection project.The existing conditions model was modified to evaluate how flood risk reduction features would impact water surface elevations along the river. • Developing an XP-SWMM model for the east side of Minot,which was used to evaluated the existing interior drainage system.The model was modified to design interior drainage system improvements as part of the second and third phases of the Mouse River enhanced flood protection project. • Developing H&H models for underground stormwater tunnels in Minneapolis including the St. Mary's, Central City, Chicago, and 11th Avenue tunnel systems. Models were used to evaluate alternatives to reduce pressure within the systems. • Using ArcGIS for analyzing land use for the City of Minnetonka's nondegradation plan. • Assisting the City of Willmar with development plan reviews for compliance with city stormwater ordinances. Education BS, Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 2006 Registration Professional Engineer: Minnesota, North Dakota Barr Engineering Company AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES This Agreement ("Agreement") made this /5 day of May, 2017, between the CITY OF FARMINGTON a municipal corporation ("City"), and BOLTON AND MENK, INC., a Minnesota Corporation("Consultant"). The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions for the provision of services by Consultant for professional engineering services related to the update of the Water Supply& Distribution Plan, Sanitary Sewer Plan and Transportation Plan hereinafter referred to as the'Work". 1. Scope of Service. The scope of service is detailed in the Proposals (one for each plan) submitted by the consultant dated April 14, 2017 and attached as Exhibit A. The terms of this contract shall take precedence over any provisions of the Consultant's proposal and/or general conditions. 2. Term of Contract. All Work under this Contract shall be provided, performed and/or completed by December 31, 2018. The work on the Water Supply and Distribution Plan shall be substantially complete by September 15, 2017 with the Sanitary Sewer and Transportation plans substantially complete by March 30, 2018. Project Schedules with interim milestones will be developed with the project kick-off meetings. 3. Compensation for Services. City agrees to pay the Consultant on an hourly basis not to exceed $80,845. No claim will be honored for compensation for extra services or beyond the scope of this Agreement or the not-to-exceed price for the services identified in the proposal without written submittal by the Consultant, and approval of an amendment by the City, with specific estimates of type, time and maximum costs. Prior to commencement of the work. 4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall prepare and submit to City, on a monthly basis, itemized invoices setting forth work performed under this Contract. Invoices submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City. Invoices to the City and payment to the Consultant by the City shall be subject to Minnesota statutory provisions pertaining to claims, including Minnesota Statutes § 471.38, 471.40, and the Minnesota Prompt Payment Act, M.S. §425.425. 5. Staffing. The Consultant has designated staffing to complete and manage the Work in the proposals attached as Exhibit A. They shall be assisted by other staff members as necessary to facilitate the completion of the Work in accordance with the terms established herein. Consultant may not remove or replace the designated staff without the approval of the City. 6. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence in the performance of its services as is ordinarily exercised by members of the profession under similar circumstances in Dakota County, Minnesota. 7. Insurance. a. General Liability. Consultant shall maintain a general liability insurance policy with limits of at least $1,500,000.00 for each person, and each occurrence, for both 1 personal injury and property damage. Consultant shall provide City with a Certificate of Insurance verifying insurance coverage before providing service to the City. b. Worker's Compensation. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker's Compensation Acts and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of Consultant's services under this Contract. 8. Indemnification. Consultant will defend and indemnify City, its officers, agents, and employees and hold them harmless from and against all judgments, claims, damages, costs and expenses, including a reasonable amount as and for its attorney's fees paid, incurred or for which it may be liable resulting from any breach of this Contract by Consultant, its agents, contractors and employees, or any negligent or intentional act or omission performed, taken or not performed or taken by Consultant, its agents, contractors and employees, relative to this Contract. City will indemnify and hold Consultant harmless from and against any loss for injuries or damages arising out of the negligent acts of the City, its officers, agents or employees. 9. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by either party by thirty (30) days' written notice delivered to the other party at the addresses written above. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the Consultant, the Consultant shall be paid for services rendered until the effective date of termination. 10. Independent Contractor. At all times and for all purposes herein, the Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. No statement herein shall be construed so as to find the Consultant an employee of the City. 11. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Contract, the Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, or age. The Consultant shall post in places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this non-discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment. The Consultant further agrees to comply with all aspects of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes 363.01, et. seq., Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 12. Subcontract or Assignment. Consultant shall not subcontract any part of the services to be provided under this Contract; nor may Consultant assign this Contract, or any interest arising herein, without the prior written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractors for all undisputed services provided by subcontractors within ten days of Consultant's receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractors on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractors. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of$100 or more is $10. 13. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. Consultant is responsible for knowing of and abiding by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the type of services provided pursuant to this Contract; including, as applicable, the Minnesota Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 13, as amended, and Minnesota Rules promulgated pursuant to Chapter 13. 2 14.Audits and Data Practices. The books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Consultant or other parties relevant to this agreement are subject to examination by the City and either Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor for a period of six years after the effective date of this contract. This Contract is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practice Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 (Data Practices Act). All government data, as defined in the Data Practices Act Section 13.02, Subd 7, which is created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant in performing any of the functions of the City during performance of this Contract is subject to the requirements of the Data Practice Act and Consultant shall comply with those requirements as if it were a government entity. All subcontracts entered into by Consultant in relation to this Contract shall contain similar Data Practices Act compliance language. 15.WORK PRODUCT. All materials, including but not limited to reports, exhibits, models, maps, charts, computer data, and supporting documentation produced under work authorized by this Agreement shall become the property of the City upon completion of the work or termination of this Agreement. 16. Conflicts. No salaried officer or employee of the City and no member of the Council, or Commission, or Board of the City shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in this contract. The violation of this provision renders the contract void. Any federal regulations and applicable state statutes shall not be violated. 17. Damages. In the event of a breach of this Contract by the City, Consultant shall not be entitled to recover punitive, special or consequential damages or damages for loss of business. 18. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 19. Severability. The provisions of this Contract are severable. If any portion hereof is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Contract. 20. Entire Agreement. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Contract supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Contract shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Contract as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF FARMINGTON BOLTON &MENK, INC. BY: B.✓r ...I Todd Larson, Mayor iz. ms's -7y, nG .1.7,---/ g ry:e AND `�' s AND -vid McKni h4`Ciistrator Its 4 (g1 BOLTON o`�Fp y\,, & MENK J Real People. Real Solutions. �`° A46.,4Sr•A PROM�S`ap • Proposal for City of Farmington Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update April 14, 2017 Submitted by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. 12224 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville, MN 55337 P:952-890-0509 F:952-890-8065 Contact: Tim Olson,P.E.,CFM C:651-724-0404 : . -'''''' timol@bolton-menk.com t , 41 _______,. ..._ , ....„.......... _ ... __....___ . ,_____ I I] ----- _ , 1 , -7, ........ !i ! , , I . . ... .... IT ,,..4....., :...,. :::: ..„----r.-..4. irl, -:: - 1 1 illY a ' . .�' I a ; 'vas CITI' �.. j �i •` Table of Contents �' 'I, r,F or ,, i 1 ' lilt '4 i_ .� % it Tr Firm Profile 1 f :,,- Goals and Objectives 2 -- - .• ---,, ill w �'�� Background and Experience 4 �.._.�_. _ ;' `'' w Detailed Work Plan 8 "` References 14 � - Background and Experience Southwest Sanitary Interceptor, City of throughout our firm,as needed,to meet Farmington's Jordan, Minnesota needs for the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Update. Bolton&Menk worked closely with the City of Jordan Project team member bios have been included.Full to develop a comprehensive interceptor model and design resumes of team members may be provided upon request. in conjunction with Capital Improvement Planning within the City's ultimate growth area.With the City primarily Brian Hilgardner, P.E. located in the Minnesota River Valley,high variations in l Client Service Manager/Principal-in-Charge topography combined with low topographic areas near the r river were amongst the key challenges when developing f Brian wilt be responsible for overseeing preliminary pipe alignments,interceptor capacities,and lift the quality of services to ensure the City is completely satisfied.He will monitor progress, station planning.The fully developed hydraulic model of schedule,and budget.Brian will work closely the anticipated interceptor system will serve as a planning with Tim to ensure critical issues are addressed in a timely manner. tool for the City as areas develop within the ultimate Brian has a history of successfully working with two growth boundary.The model will be continuously updated current City of Farmington staff—Katy Gehler and John as new development comes online,utilities are extended Schmeling—in their previous positions. into unserved areas,and land use plans develop and change over time. Since beginning his career in 1998,Brian has gained a range of experience in project administration from Similarities to Farmington conception through construction.His background includes Future growth area planning, comprehensive sanitary sewer development and design of municipal reconstruction planning projects including street construction,sanitary sewer systems,lift stations,water distribution systems,stormwater collection systems,and pedestrian facility construction.His Key Person n e t administrative duties have included preliminary engineering reports,cost estimates,preliminary and final design, Bolton&Menk has assembled a highly motivated and presentations,attendance at City Council meetings,bidding assistance,and construction administration.He is also an experienced group of professionals for the Comprehensive expert in trenchless technology techniques. Sanitary Sewer Plan Update. Our team has experience evaluating and developing successful solutions to meet Tim Olson, P.E.,CFM the needs of our clients.We value and understand the Project Manager importance of ultimately achieving an update that can be supported by stakeholders and implemented efficiently. /11;411, Tim will serve as Project Manager and will closely coordinate with the City.He will serve By providing additional services related to the City's as the primary contact for the City and provide Comprehensive Plan,we strongly believe our team can overall management of the project team, provide a complete understanding of the long-term land use schedule,cost,quality,and scope management processes. and transportation and infrastructure planning as well as Tim has assisted in the development of comprehensive reduce the City's financial commitments. plans per Metropolitan Council standards and a multitude of comprehensive sanitary sewer planning studies.He also The Bolton&Menk team is intended to be an extension has ample experience utilizing digital system data,flow of City staff,maintaining close coordination between the measurements, lift station records,and hydraulic software City's project coordinator and project team at all times. to analyze system deficiencies and proposed system The proposed team provides the optimum combination improvements. of accessibility,local knowledge of the community, and specialized expertise.Our team will be led by our Tim began his career in 2006.He has worked on the Project Manager,Tim Olson,who will be supported by design and development of Comprehensive Stormwater key individuals and support staff. Bolton&Menk has Management Plans,hydrologic and hydraulic studies, the ability to draw on more than 450 other staff members and hydrologic plan reviews.His responsibilities include Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update I City of Farmington.Minnesota 6 Background and Experience identification and discussion of NPDES Phase I &II Jane Kansier,ACCP requirements, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, and k Senior Urban Planner identification of alternatives for proposed improvements. He has also prepared a multitude of Stormwater Pollution Jane will ensure a quality Comprehensive Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and submitted associated t\ Sanitary Sewer Plan Update is provided and is well integrated with additional comprehensive NPDES Phase II Construction Stormwater Permits.Tim has additional experience with a variety of engineering planning. tasks including design computations, preliminary layout Jane began her planning career in 1984 and has worked in and design, research and preparation of preliminary city and county planning, city administration, and public engineering reports, and feasibility studies. He also assists transit. She has extensive experience in the coordination and development of comprehensive plans, zoning with project design,preparation of plans and specifications, ordinances, city codes, site plan and development review, and cost and quantity take-off estimates. grant writing, and project management. Her primary Tim has extensive experience in stormwater modeling duties include project management for services related to municipal planning, metropolitan area comprehensive plan using the Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis, XPSWMM, StormCAD, and InfoSWMM software. His development, and land use analysis and impacts. GIS experience coupled with his watershed modeling Tyler Johnson experience makes him a valuable team member for all GIS Professional Bolton & Menk stormwater management planning. r Tyler will be responsible for developing GIS- D ejectn deFeP.E. related tools and maintaining consistency Project Engineer between the City's GIS database and the Sanitary Sewer System Plan Updates. Dustin will be responsible for data collection, Tyler is a GIS Specialist who began his career in 2005. technical analysis,and report development for the project.He will use his sanitary analysis He provides GIS expertise to internal and external clients and technical modeling skillset to complete and assists with database development, data analysis, and deliverable products on time and with a high level of quality. advanced map development and layout. Prior to joining Dustin began his career in 2012 and joined Bolton& Bolton &Menk in 2015,Tyler was a GIS Research Menk's Water Resources Work Group in 2015. His primary Analysis Specialist with the Minnesota Department of responsibilities include the development of hydrologic Revenue and also worked as a GIS Analyst with the Iowa and hydraulic modeling for preliminary project layouts. Flood Center. Prior to joining Bolton&Menk,Dustin worked as a Water Management Engineer for Wisconsin's Department of During his career,Tyler has gained extensive experience Natural Resources. with environmental applications of GPS, GIS, and remote sensing. He has used Python scripting to automate workflows and extend GIS functionality. He has worked His responsibilities included providing technical assistance to communities regarding the National Flood on a variety of projects that include floodplain inundation Insurance Program and administering Wisconsin's Dam production and mapping, data and LiDAR analysis, E911 address geocoding,orthorectification,and georeferencing. Safety Program, which involved the assistance of plan review, onsite review, and approvals for dam repairs and reconstructions. Dustin has extensive experience in HEC- RAS and HEC-HMS programs. He also has experience in Autodesk Civil 3D software and hydraulic design using HydroCAD and Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis. Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 7 f1 BOLTON Detailed Work Plan ,\ & M E N K section 4 Real People.Real Solutions. Farmington .tom- .' ;-''' 2e, lid � � Detailed Work Plan provide: Detailed Work Plan pro Pr ject jectlmanagement • Technical review A successful Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan • Sanitary system evaluation relies on a complete understanding of Farmington's issues • Hydraulic modeling abilities . and resources,as well as future City development goals. • Digital file management Below is our approach to developing a sustainable plan that • GIS/AutoCAD data storage and display can be supported by the community and its stakeholders. • Proven experience Sustainability The following approach will meet the City's goals and Our team will Sustainable Solution objectives of the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System implement a Sustainable Plan Update. Decision-Making cT``+out iECyp� `� Approach to address oma , Task 1: Communication the goals of the Subtask 1.1 Kick-Off Meeting Comprehensive Sanitary A kick-off meeting will be scheduled immediately after Sewer System Plan Notice-to-Proceed.This meeting will: Update by including 3 • Introduce the entire Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer an evaluation of key ` Plan team to the consulting staff developing the plan elements such as • Establish communication protocols associated with Technically Feasible, P-enMaaiE P various plan aspects Economically Viable, °'----^ • Formulate a mutually acceptable milestone schedule Environmentally Compatible,and Publicly Acceptable. We will also develop a plan for incorporating maps, modeling files,and practical field experiences with the A Technically Feasible plan includes one that builds upon existing sanitary sewer collection system. plans already completed,establishes technical objectives based on sound planning and engineering principles, and Subtask 1.2 City Council Workshop applies experience to find flexible and feasible solutions. Bolton&Menk will attend a City Council Workshop to present a draft report and solicit input.We will summarize An Economically Viable plan will be sensitive to the the comments and questions provided by the Council and existing infrastructure and how it can best be used to serve incorporate the information into the draft report. future redevelopment and adapt to climatological changes. - _ An Environmentally Compatible plan identifies sensitive4. features of the community in order to protect and accentuate '. A � ,f environmental,historic,and cultural resources while e meeting future needs to support redevelopment. A Publicly and Politically Acceptable plan identifies and involves stakeholders early in the decision-making process, listens and understands issues,and informs and maintains communication. Subtask 1.3 City Council Meeting Our Approach Bolton&Menk will attend a City Council meeting to The City of Farmington can be confident in Bolton& present the final draft report document and summarize our Menk's policy to staff all major projects using a team findings.Any additional comments provided by the City approach,maintaining close coordination between the City Council will be incorporated into the final deliverable plan. and project team at all times.The team assembled for this Submitted by Bolton&Menk.Inc. Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 8 Detailed Work Plan Subtask 1.4 Planning Commission Meeting sewer information is in a format that is readily accessible Key team members will attend a Planning Commission for input into CAD/GIS and/or modeling software.We meeting to gather feedback on critical City issues and have not included tasks for manual data entry of as-built present plan development progress and implementation data into CAD/GIS format. strategies at a key milestone.The meeting will coordinate the goals of the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Subtask 2.2 Discuss System Deficiencies team with the Planning Commission to ensure positive As defined in Task I, meetings with the City and MCES collaboration. will be established soon after the preliminary issues map is assembled to ensure all issues and concerns are defined by Subtask 1.5 Planning Commission Meeting Public Hearing the stakeholders that know the system best. Key team members will attend a Planning Commission meeting public hearing to present the final draft of the Deliverables: Summary of City records,City-identified planning document.Any additional comments obtained system deficiencies at the public hearing will be incorporated into the final planning document. Task 3: Prepare Inflow and Infiltration Summary Subtask 1.6 Interim Progress Meetings Subtask 3.1 Review MCES Flows and Peaking Factors We anticipate up to three additional progress meetings as Bolton&Menk will review the MCES metered flow data preliminary materials are developed, at which time, the to determine the extent of I&I during wet periods.Also, City will provide comments and the Comprehensive Plan MCES peaking factors will be reviewed and compared to will be modified to reflect those comments. industry standards. Recommendations for modifications to peaking factors will be offered, if applicable. Subtask 1.7 MCES Staff Meetings We anticipate up to two additional progress meetings with Deliverables: Summary of I&I identified in MCES MCES staff to discuss interceptor capacity and future metered flow data,summary of existing peaking factors, planning issues.All comments provided by MCES staff recommendations for peaking factor modifications will be documented and incorporated into the final planning document. RESIDENTIAL SANITARY FLOW TIME PATTERN Deliverables: Meeting attendance, meeting minutes, summary of City Council, Planning Commission and MCES comments 120 Task 2: Existing Wastewater Collection System Condition Review — Subtask 2.1 Review City Records Thorough review of the City's sanitary sewer system records will be completed to mine data relevant to the pipe network and estimating sanitary service flows.We will also assemble a database of geospatial information defining sewer system sf s age,pipe material, and groundwater elevations to identify potential hotspots in the system.A system-wide issues map Task 4:Sanitary Sewer Flow Projections will be discussed at the kick-off meeting.We will utilize the Subtask 4.1 Determine Existing and Future Flow Projections City's knowledge of the system to update the map with any Based on initial projections of system capacity, current anecdotal information and other system issues. land uses, and future growth considerations, we will preliminarily identify critical capacity issues.We will also We assume that Bolton & Menk will not be responsible work closely with City of Farmington Planning staff to for any additional field data collection to amend the City's understand future land use projections and the impacts to current CAD data. Further, we assume that all as-built the sanitary sewer service system. Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update i City of Farmington,Minnesota 9 Detailed Work Plan Subtask 4.2 Review Sewersheds on known flows into MCES interceptors and actual peak Bolton & Menk will use digital system geometrics, flows during wet and dry cycles at City lift stations. land use files,topography, lift station locations,and MCES interceptor connections to review sanitary sewer Deliverables: Summary of flow projections,preliminary and service areas identified in the 2008 Sanitary Sewer Plan. final sewershed maps Where applicable, we will further subdivide the sanitary sewersheds. In critical areas,we will delineate service Task 5: Develop Sanitary Sewer Collection flows to contributing lateral lines to track system capacity System Model deficiencies. In most areas,we anticipate trunk lines will be the most critical. Subtask 5.1 Review and Update Current Spreadsheet Model We understand the City currently maintains a spreadsheet- Subtask 4.3 Develop Wastewater Service Flows based model that uses assumed service flows to compare Bolton & Menk has worked extensively with communities gravity flow capacity of specific trunk sewer lines.The to effectively merge land use information with sewershed spreadsheet offers some hydraulic support of the system and delineations in a GIS environment to automatically stores additional system attributes.While comprehensive determine spatially varied sewer service flows.By using of the trunk lines, it is not in a graphical format.We will GIS tools and techniques, service flows are computed in review the tabular data and modify service flows and pipe seconds for the entire service area and with a high level of sizes as needed based on the results of the data review. consistency and accuracy. Since we already have these tools We will also modify the future conditions model with any in place, we intend to pass these cost savings on to the City. changes in land use,additional development flows,and anticipated changes in service flows due to redevelopment. Based on land use,we will assign peak flow rate factors and appropriate peaking factors to each sewershed.The In order to distinguish between spreadsheet information will be populated in the sewershed layer and model updates and development of a new linked to the pipe network. hydrodynamic model,we have separated these tasks in the Fee Table.We understand that development of a hydrodynamic model requires an additional economic commitment,but we believe the benefit-to-cost ratio is high.The associated fees for tabular and hydrodynamic modeling are interchangeable and negotiable. i Subtask 5.2 Develop Model Framework � `` 1 While spreadsheet-based models are effective for U� comparing instantaneous service flows to gravity pipe capacity, there are some limitations.We believe that an effective plan can become a truly living document when Subtask 4.4 Develop Usage Changes for Commercial/ the correct technical resources are in place and maintained. Industrial Users Bolton & Menk is well versed in a variety of hydrodynamic In commercial and industrial areas, we will investigate sewer modeling programs including Autodesk's Storm and potential sanitary sewer usage changes based on Sanitary Analysis (SSA).We understand the City currently redevelopment or expansion goals.These modifications has Autodesk licenses,which includes SSA.We also in service flows will be incorporated into the overall understand the City is proficient with the graphical tools service flow analysis and ultimately into the sewer system and has performed storm sewer design and modeling with hydraulic model. the software.While we will present different modeling options at the Kickoff Meeting,we feel that SSA will Subtask 4.5 Assign Peaking Factors provide the City with an accurate and easy to manipulate Peaking factors will be recommended and assigned based model of your sanitary sewer system. Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 10 Detailed Work Plan A comprehensive hydrodynamic trunk sewer model will improve data accuracy and consistency.Appropriate will provide the City with the following opportunities peaking factors will also be assigned and imported into the for successful implementation of the proposed sewer hydraulic model. improvements: • Graphical integration of the City's current tabular Subtask 5.4 Present Existing Conditions Model Results analysis tools Prior to initial modeling runs,the model setup and initial • Interoperability with both CAD and GIS file formats data inputs will be reviewed with the City to ensure all • Easy import and export of GIS files for automatic assumptions are consistent with City goals.Updates to model development and geodatabase creation modeling assumptions will be performed based on City • Ability to develop geospatial relationships between comment prior to presenting initial modeling results.All sanitary service flows and pipe capacity modeling results will be presented as visual graphics and • Conversion of complex hydraulic calculations to an maps,unless table output is otherwise warranted. Output easy to understand mapping format with the freedom to graphics will include,but may not be limited to,the clearly symbolize critical system deficiencies following: • Continuous update of the model to reflect changes in • Hydraulic model service flow and pipe size • GIS database • Pipe characteristic maps Bolton &Menk has extensive experience using GIS ° Pipe size information to automatically populate spatially developed ° Pipe age modeling data.We will use these techniques to cost- ° Gravity flow capacity effectively develop the sewer collection system model in ° Actual model capacity SSA and dramatically reduce user input error. ° Identification of below,at and over capacity pipes • Sewershed assumptions We assume that applicable system geometric information is • Sewer service flows available in a CAD format that is readily available for use • Peaking factors in the hydraulic model.We will convert the information to • Lift station locations Esri shapefile format to import the geometric pipe network • Lift station capacity into SSA. Deliverables:Preliminary model layout, existing conditions If there are gaps in the geometric data,we will present model results the areas to the City for additional field data collection or as-built research.We will also use Light Detection and Task 6: Evaluate Farmington Sanitary Ranging (LiDAR) surface topography to populate missing Collection System rim elevations _ _ Subtask 6.1 Analyze Sanitary Collection System and use adjacent . _" " """""' "" Based on the final modeling results,we will analyze the slopes or existing hydraulic system for deficiencies related to pipe minimum grade `=- and lift station capacity.Further,we will present modeling calculations results in GIS and tabular format for the following: to populate = • Adequacy of the existing sewer service system missing invert • Capacity at the MCES interceptor tie-ins (flow line) • Existing lift station capacity elevations. • Review of sewer system for potential operational issues • Identification of sewer rehabilitation projects and other Subtask 5.3 Populate Flow Data capital improvements Bolton&Menk-derived GIS tools will be used to develop spatial relationships between land use and sewersheds Deliverables:Evaluation of sewer system,summary of system to automatically calculate and populate sewer flow data. deficiencies,sewer issues maps The flow data will be automatically imported into SSA. This will not only expedite the model building process but Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update I City of Farmington.Minnesota 11 Detailed Work Plan Task 7: Determine Future Sanitary • • Collection System Needs • Subtask 7.1 Recommend Long-Range Planning We will use the calibrated existing conditions model to account for future growth areas,potential changes to sewer service needs for existing commercial and industrial users, 44 v and redevelopment.The Future Conditions Model will .1' ` i� account for the following: " " 14N- • Identify increases in pipe size needed to accommodate future service flow changes °' r • Target areas that could benefit from alignment changes or addition of interceptor lines • Identify the need for additional lift stations Task 8: Final Comprehensive Sewer Plan Subtask 7.2 Recommend Capital Improvements Report The Future Conditions Model will establish a framework Subtask 8.1 Prepare Final Report for the required system improvements to accommodate The Final Summary and Recommendations Report will be growth and redevelopment.The future improvements will a culmination to the data collection and modeling efforts. be compared to Comprehensive Land Use Planning to It will provide an effective framework for sewer system establish: improvements.The hydraulic models, GIS system,and • An effective timeline for system improvements Comprehensive Report will function as planning tools that • A Capital Improvement Plan that establishes the set in motion the next generation of sanitary service for the required costs for improvements City of Farmington.The tool set will be formatted to allow • A basis for financing options for consistent modification as system improvements are constructed or land use changes come to fruition. Deliverables:Recommended long-range plan,recommended CIP Deliverables:Final Comprehensive Sewer Plan report Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 12 Detailed Work Plan Fees Bolton&Menk will plan a system for the City of Farmington that is both resilient and cost efficient.The total cost of a project is not lowest when you sum a series of low bids; it is lowest when the upfront planning correctly identifies the best technology or plan for a system and then implements that. More money can be saved with thoughtful planning than any other phase of a project. Bolton&Menk will work with you on this project with the best planning approach in mind to get you true value. Please note we have developed two alternative approaches to the sanitary sewer modeling task.A more cost-effective approach would be to update the City's current sanitary sewer inventory and hydraulic calculation spreadsheet to better align the anticipated project budget.However,RFP also indicates a more robust hydraulic modeling approach be proposed. Bolton &Menk is well versed in a variety of hydraulic software for effective capacity calculations and data mapping interoperability. If the City so chooses,we feel our approach to hydraulic modeling of the sanitary sewer system will further validate current system capacity issues and provide a more robust approach to future system planning. In addition,we are proposing a software (Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis) with which the City is already familiar. With some additional one-on-one training provided by Bolton &Menk,the City could easily manipulate future sanitary sewer configurations and continuously update the model as needed.We are confident this approach is cost effective and will result in a truly dynamic and sustainable plan.If the more robust approach to sanitary sewer modeling is chosen,we would not anticipate any updates to the current spreadsheet model. Rather,we would utilize the existing information to generate the next evolution of sanitary sewer modeling for the City of Farmington. Client:City of Farmington Project:Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update Bolton&Menk,Inc. N m u N C V ro C 0 j Task No. Work Task Description l '170 6 . N N a v � a 0' Total Total Cost m . c C a Hours v v v W Jo a V 2 o N 0 1.0 Communication 9 17 0 2 0 I 28 $3,906 2.0 Existing Wastewater Collection System Condition Review 0 4 8 0 0 12 $1,432 3.0 Prepare Inflow and Infiltration Summary 0 2 4 0 0 6 $716 4.0 Sanitary Sewer Flow Projections 0 7 22 2 4 35 $4,176 5.1 Review and Update Current Spreadsheet Model 0 2 12 0 0 14 $1,636 6.0 Evaluate Farmington Sanitary Collection System 0 4 14 0 4 22 $2,582 7.0 Determine Future Sanitary Collection System Needs 4 16 24 0 0 44 $5,448 8.0 Final Comprehensive Sewer Plan Report 4 8 25 0 0 37 $4,539 Total Hours 17 60 109 4 8 198 Average Hourly Rate $160.00 $128.00 $115.00 $145.00 $115.00 Subtotal $2,720 $7,680 $12,535 $580 $920 Sub Total Fee $24,435 5.2-4 Develop Sanitary Sewer Collection System Model(Optional) 0 22 52 0 0 74 $8,796 Subtotal $0 $2,816 $5,980 $0 $0 J Total Fee $33,231 Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 13 eAy�, tABOLTON , & MENK i Real People. Real Solutions. p�°'A4,.. `` i A PR0M"5 Proposal for City of Farmington Transportation System Pian Update April 14, 2017 Submitted by: w, . Bolton& Menk, Inc. 12224 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville,MN 55337 P:952-890-0509 F:952-890-8065 Contact: Peter Langworthy,AICP C:612-759-8369 peterla@bolton-menk.com r Iwo tit,. a . i ,, • • -,-. __ --- -• Ili Jul/ _4;.___.,..-• _ : . ' r µ , Y , Table of Contents ... - " — Firm Profile 1 _ - — Goals and Objectives 2 - - Background and Experience 4 " Detailed Work Plan 9 % Background and Experience • Roadway system plan (proposed functionalBrian Hitgardner, P.E. classification and jurisdictional classification,roadway Alt' Client Service Manager/OA-OC safety, and mobility needs) • Recommended City access management guidelines and Brian will be responsible for overseeing roadway design standards the quality of services to ensure the City is • Transit plan completely satisfied.He will monitor progress, Bikeways, sidewalks, and trail plan schedule,and budget,and work closely with • Peter to ensure critical issues are addressed in a timely manner.Brian • Aviation and freight will be the City's lead contact for this project. • Transportation support for public outreach Brian has a history of successfully working with two • Transportation goals and policies current City of Farmington staff—Katy Gehler and John Schmeling in their previous positions. In addition, Similarities to Farmington he has lived in Farmington and worked in neighboring Coordination with HKGi,transportation plan meeting Met communities, making him very familiar with the local Council requirements,travel demand forecast modeling, GIS context and infrastructure/planning considerations. mapping,safety and capacity improvement identification, multi-modal planning, public outreach Since beginning his career in 1998, Brian has gained a range of experience in project administration from conception through construction. His background includes development and design of municipal reconstruction Key Personnel projects, including street construction,sanitary sewer systems, lift stations, water distribution systems, stormwater collection systems, and pedestrian facility The Bolton & Menk team is intended to be an extension construction. His administrative duties have included of City staff, maintaining close coordination between the preliminary engineering reports,cost estimates, preliminary City's Project Manager and project team at all times.The and final design,presentations,attendance at City proposed team provides a strong combination of local Council meetings, bidding assistance, and construction knowledge of area conditions, specialized expertise, and administration. He is also an expert in trenchless office accessibility.Our team will be led by our Project technology techniques. Manager, Peter Langworthy, who will be supported by key individuals and support staff. Bolton & Menk has Brian holds a B.S. Degree in Civil Engineering from the the ability to draw on more than 450 other staff members University of Minnesota. throughout our firm, including more than 60 transportation planners and engineers, to meet Farmington's needs for the Peter Langworthy,AICP 2040 Transportation System Plan. Project team member Project Manager bios have been included here. Full resumes of team members may be provided upon request. Peter will serve as Project Manager and will lead the preparation of transportation planning work products.He will place the highest priority on coordination with City staff in a timely and effective manner.He will provide overall management of the project team,schedule,cost,quality,and scope management processes. Peter has been performing planning work for public infrastructure projects for over 25 years. His areas We promise every client two things: we'll of expertise include transportation planning and work hard for you and we'll do a good job. environmental (NEPA) documentation. He is highly skilled at multidisciplinary coordination and analysis for a range of planning projects in the civil engineering field. Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Transportation System Plan Update I City of Farmington.Minnesota 6 Background and Experience Peter has extensive experience preparing municipal Bryan is a respected and trusted traffic engineer and comprehensive transportation plans in Minnesota.With forecaster by many communities in the metro area. a previous firm,he was the lead author of ten municipal He recently completed a subarea study for the City of transportation plans, including eight within the metro Bloomington in the areas surrounding France Avenue.This area for communities similar in size to Farmington as work included an urban traffic study, safety analysis,and part of the 2030 planning process in compliance with recommendations for multimodal connections, as well as Metropolitan Council requirements.With Bolton&Menk, future mobility needs. he prepared the Highway 2 and 91 Gateway and Access Study for Elko New Market and had important roles in Most directly relevant to this project, Bryan was the Project MnDOT Metro District's TH 10 Access Planning Study Manager for the 2009 Farmington Area Transportation and Metropolitan Council/MnDOT Metro District's Study. For this project,he performed or led all of the traffic regional Principal Arterial Intersection Conversion Study forecasting as well as intersection and corridor analyses, (ICS).For the ICS study he performed an extensive and he generated the study recommendations.He also review of local comprehensive plans and other studies served the Engineering Lead role for the City of Mound to systematically document local goals and intentions 2030 Transportation Plan summarized earlier in this section. regarding improvements to existing at-grade intersections on principal arterials.He has led or prepared NEPA Bryan holds an M.S. Degree in Transportation Engineering environmental documentation for many transportation and Planning from the University of Wisconsin and a projects throughout his career. B.S.Degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado. Peter holds a Master of Urban and Regional Planning Degree (Transportation Planning concentration) from the L * Ashley Hudson University of Minnesota's Humphrey Institute for Public Transportation Planner Policy.Prior to this he had obtained a B.A in Sociology from Bates College and an M.S. in Energy Management ' so Ashley will support Peter with the preparation and Policy from the University of Pennsylvania. of the 2040 Transportation Plan Update.In this role,she will work closely with the team on all Bryan Nemeth, RE., PTOE aspects of plan development. Traffic Engineering/Forecasting Lead Ashley began her career in 2011 as a Transportation Planner and Landscape Designer. She has excellent abilities Bryan will lead and provide traffic and in graphics,writing and research, creative thinking, land transportation engineering elements of the use planning,and general transportation planning.Ashley's • project.This will include overseeing the traffic experience and technical aptitude allow her to effectively forecasting work,reviewing previous studies communicate project related information in an effective, and existing conditions from a technical perspective,and making non-threatening manner. In addition,her ability to listen recommendations for future projects and studies. and understand the stakeholder's perspectives helps build Bryan is a Senior Traffic Engineer who began the practice trust and allows for productive two-way communication of engineering in 1997. He has extensive experience between project partners and key stakeholders. in traffic forecasting and analysis,operational analysis including simulation, and development and evaluation Her project experience includes corridor planning projects of innovative intersection and interchange concepts. at varying scales,several park and trail master plans, He has led or co-led multiple research and intersection roadway and pedestrian scale lighting plans,array of development projects including the Evaluation of public outreach efforts,and several successful funding Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossings for the Minnesota pursuits mostly for new trail/sidewalk facilities and park Local Road Research Board (LRRB) and MnDOT; mini- development/redevelopment projects.Ashley also has roundabout concept design in coordination with multiple project experience on the construction side, including cities, MnDOT, and FHWA; and intersection concepts with landscape inspection and product selection and approval MnDOT, IADOT, and FHWA. for both site amenities and lighting products. Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Transportation System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 7 Background and Experience Ashley holds a M.S. Degree in Urban and Regional Tyler Danielson Planning from Minnesota State University,Mankato and , GIS/Mapping a B.S.Degree in Landscape Architecture/Environmental Design from North Dakota State University. Tyler will provide all GIS coordination and mapping for the project. Dillon Petrowitz110 Tyler is a GIS Specialist who began Planning and Document Support his career in 2010,working with Geographic Information Systems. He has expertise with Dillon will support Ashely and Peter with internal and external clients and assists with database transportation planning analysis and document development,data analysis,and advanced map development preparation. and layout. Prior to joining Bolton&Menk in 2016,Tyler Dillon began his planning career in was a GIS Analyst for an environmental consulting firm 2015.He has experience with long range and subarea plans; specializing in GIS support for environmental review for corridor studies;research,analysis,and impacts;land use the solar and oil and gas industries. compatibility and integration;and public involvement. Additionally,Dillon has experience with GIS mapping and During his career,Tyler has gained extensive understanding analysis.He recently played a key role in the analysis and of the Esri GIS suite of programs.Additionally,he has documentation of the Metropolitan Council/MnDOT Metro used GPS Pathfinder Office and Terrasync to provide field Principal Arterial Intersection Conversion Study. staff with concise,customized data collection workflows. Tyler has been a part of a range of GIS projects including Dillon holds an M.A. Degree in Urban Planning and a production mapping, emergency response analysis,cultural B.S.Degree in Urban and Regional Studies, both from resource and natural resource mapping, data gathering, Minnesota State University, Mankato. LiDAR analysis,remote sensing,orthorectification,and georeferencing.Tyler has developed superior mapping skills eeChao Wu, EIT for transportation studies and plans. , i la Traffic Forecasting Elements a W Chao,a Transportation Engineer-in-Training(EIT), will work closely with Bryan Nemeth on traffic projections and will provide other engineering support as needed. Chao began his profession in the planning and engineering field in 2014.He is experienced with data analysis,traffic monitoring, and modeling. Chao is also responsible for performing design and construction observation on transportation and municipal projects.He has been working closely with Bryan and staff at the Metropolitan Council to understand and run the new Regional Travel Demand Model.Chao also recently assisted our team with intersection reviews and data QC for the Principal Arterial Intersection Conversion Study. Chao holds an M.S. Degree in Urban and Regional Planning and a B.S. Degree in Civil Engineering, both from the University of Minnesota. Submitted by Bolton&Menk.Inc. Transportation System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 8 1 BOLTON Detailed Work Plan & M E N K section 4 Real People.Real Solutions. 1111111/11111 Farm1ngto ljet r r}r it 0 0 Detailed Work Plan i Detaled Work Plan and our team at all times.The team assembled for this project is designed to provide: • Project management A successful Transportation System Plan relies on a • Technical review and evaluation complete understanding of the City's issues and resources, • 2040 traffic modeling/projections as well as the culture that makes Farmington unique. Below • GIS mapping consistent with Metropolitan Council is our approach to developing a sustainable plan that can be requirements supported by the community and its stakeholders. • Public outreach support • Clear report documentation,understandable to non- Sustainability technical readers Our team will Sustainable Solution implement a Sustainable The following information directly corresponds with work Decision-Making + i elements identified in the Detailed Cost Estimate table on Approach to address page 14. the goals of the Transportation System Task 1: Project Management Plan Update by 1.1 Communication and Administration including an evaluation We will place a premium priority on timely and effective A W of key elements such as 3 communication with the City's Project Manager through Technically Feasible, 1- the duration of the work.Our Client Service Manager will Economically Viable, r°41PAT16LE � be the City's lead contact for the project,supported by our Environmentally Project Manager,Peter Langworthy,with coordination as Compatible,and Publicly Acceptable. needed. A Technically Feasible plan includes one that builds upon Peter will prepare and provide miscellaneous project plans already completed,establishes technical objectives correspondence,scheduling, invoicing, and the budget based on sound planning and engineering principles, and management necessary for expediting work products and applies experience to find flexible and feasible solutions. project decision making.He will also effectively coordinate internal tasks to ensure efficient work flow.Please note all An Economically Viable plan will be sensitive to local external meetings are addressed in Task 2. market,economic,and fiscal conditions.It creates a vision for the future that is both inspiring and achievable. Task 2: Meetings 2.1 Kick-Off/Staff Meetings An Environmentally Compatible plan identifies both A kick-off meeting will be scheduled immediately natural and built assets in the community,and balances after Notice-to-Proceed.This meeting with the entire policy alternatives to protect and accentuate existing Transportation System Plan Update Team will: resources,while supporting improvements that enhance • Confirm mutual understanding of project goals and community livability and vitality. objectives and discuss points of emphasis for the project A Publicly and Politically Acceptable plan identifies and • Establish communication protocols involves stakeholders early in the decision-making process, • Formulate a mutually acceptable project milestone listens and understands issues,and informs and maintains schedule communication. We will also participate in up to three additional meetings Our Approach with City staff as deemed necessary by the City to The City of Farmington can be confident in Bolton& discuss work status,issues that may arise,traffic forecast Menk's policy to staff all major projects using a team parameters,or other topics as appropriate. approach,maintaining close coordination between the City Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Transportation System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 9 Detailed Work Plan iii � , I:,,,. ,. .. _" _ .i. , _ ,.. . „, -,, . . _ . _ . ., _ _ „...,_,,,,.„. . , , ..,.: ,, ...... „,.. , .. ,,,,, -.J • ^-i+4- ;10 ,;r.,;k!,'AO O ' I .� ,••'"Ilq - _ `-"` 7 ,..of _ • -,oh, Tv 1 ( jjk. 2.2 City Council/Planning Commission Meetings ensure that Planning Commission and Council comments Per the RFP,we will participate in the following: are appropriately addressed. • One City Council workshop • One City Council meeting 2.3 Public Open House Meetings Council/Planning • One Planning Commission meeting Commission Meetings We understand the overall public engagement program for While the schedule of these meetings would be at the the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update will be managed by discretion of City staff,we would envision the City the City's Comprehensive Plan consultant, HKGi, and that Council workshop could take place relatively early in the we will serve as a transportation resource to them during project.We would walk Council through the transportation the outreach process.We will participate in up to two open planning process, identify topics we anticipate will be house meetings and will provide transportation materials covered, and solicit input regarding these or other topics including poster boards as coordinated with HKGi and City Council members deem appropriate. staff. Our Project Manager will attend these meetings to provide transportation support to HKGi.At the conclusion Since there do not appear to be major or controversial of each open house we will generate a memorandum to issues to be addressed in the 2040 Transportation System City staff summarizing transportation comments and Plan,we feel it would be adequate and appropriate to have questions raised at the meeting, as well as the potential the formal presentations to the Planning Commission and need for actions to address those comments/questions. City Council relatively late in the project schedule. We will provide transportation questions for the overall Comprehensive Plan questionnaire. We envision the presentation to the Planning Commission would take place after a draft of the document has been We will participate in the Planning Commission public prepared.The Planning Commission members could be hearing.We assume consultant activities for this event will given the opportunity to review the draft.At the Planning be managed by HKGi,under the supervision of City staff. Commission meeting we would summarize the draft, We will provide support to HKGi for this event,similar to answer questions,and receive input. the public open house meetings. We then envision the meeting with the City Council would Task 3: Prepare Draft Transportation Plan provide the opportunity to present the draft document, For this proposal we are defining"draft 2040 Transportation its findings and recommendations,and input received System Plan"as the document distributed to the Planning from the Planning Commission.Input from the Planning Commission and City Council for review.This draft Commission and full Council could then be incorporated would capture comments made by City staff on an earlier into the final deliverable.We would work with City staff to preliminary draft. Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Transportation System PLan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 10 Detailed Work Plan 3.1 Introduction/Goals and Objectives We will also summarize the 2017 Seed/Genstar Alternative The Introduction will identify the background,goals,and Urban Areawide Review(traffic section)—another key structure of the document.It will also include Transportation document.This covers the next area of growth in the Goals and Objectives.We will start with the Goals and northeast portion of the City. Objectives from the 2030 Farmington Transportation Plan and refine and/or augment them from input received from 3.3 Future Roadway System Plan City staff and public outreach. Traffic Forecasts and Roadway Deficiency Analysis- We will identify and map programmed and planned 3.2 Existing Roadway Conditions roadway improvements in the Farmington area to define Relying heavily on mapping that we will generate the assumed 2040 roadway network baseline.We will consistent with Metropolitan Council requirements,we then generate 2040 forecasts with a method that will will characterize the current roadway network serving be approved by Metropolitan Council.As discussed in Farmington in terms of: the Goals and Objectives portion of this proposal, the • Current traffic volumes, including heavy commercial Metropolitan Council 2040 regional traffic model is not yet volumes available. If we determine after it becomes available its use • Jurisdictional classification is not viable within the budget identified in this proposal, • Functional classification we will generate 2040 forecasts for arterial and collector • Number of lanes on collector and arterial roadways roadways within Farmington based on: • Consideration of future development within Farmington w. t and associated trip generation and distribution • Coordination with Dakota County and consideration of their 2040 forecasting results • Coordination with MnDOT regarding TH 3 volumes • Review of relevant transportation studies including the —'� transportation section of the Seed Genstar AUAR . ii a + fir: . While not required by the Metropolitan Council guidelines, - x.,.w 3 V• we will also map safety conditions as indicated by 5r{--'�,' t JOE - ' observed crash rates in comparison with expected crash rates for the given type of intersection. Crash rates account - for volume and are thus significantly more valuable than absolute number of crashes when attempting to evaluate problem locations. We will compare projected 2040 traffic volumes against planning-level capacity estimates for the collector and Consistent with Metropolitan Council Local Planning arterial roadways in the Farmington network assumed for Handbook requirements,we will identify and summarize 2040 and map Level of Service (LOS) outcomes.Where transportation planning documents that are relevant to the capacity deficiencies are shown we will identify needed 2040 transportation planning process.We anticipate the capacity improvements. most significant document will be the Farmington Area Transportation Study,which Bolton&Menk completed in Functional Classification-We will prepare a 2040 2009.Since development is only now picking up after the roadway functional classification map.Conferring with economic downturn of 2008,most of the information and City staff, this will include any proposed changes to recommendations from the document are still relevant. existing functional class designations and will also cover anticipated new roadways. Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Transportation System Plan Update I City of Farmington.Minnesota 11 Detailed Work Plan Jurisdictional Classification-We will prepare a 2040 regarding including existing and future functional and roadway jurisdictional classification map,conferring with operational characteristics of the airport,as well as City staff. addressing noise and land use compatibility factors. Access Management-We will identify MnDOT 3.7 Freight Plan and Dakota County access management guidelines and We will identify railways and any freight terminals within any revisions to the City's current access management the City, as well as any other nodes that may generate guidelines based on our review and consultation with City significant freight movement.We will identify any local staff. roadway issues or problem areas for goods movement and include heavy commercial volumes on our existing traffic 3.4 Transit Plan mapping. As identified in the Metropolitan Council's System Statement for the City,Farmington is a Market Area IV 3.8 Implementation Plan location.These areas have the least potential for transit Bolton&Menk will compile the information from the ridership because of low residential and job density, preceding sections of the Draft Transportation System Plan distance from the core metro area, or other factors.There into implementation actions.This will include: currently is no scheduled transit service in Farmington. • Recommendations regarding specific intersection and The closest park-and-ride lots for commuter routes are in corridor improvement projects and/or studies Apple Valley and Lakeville.The Metropolitan Council and • Preparation of 5-, 10-,and 20-year capital improvement Minnesota Valley Transit Authority do not identify future plans including recommendations for allocations of transitways or service for Farmington. costs • Identificationof right-of-way preservation needs and The Transportation Plan will summarize transit information procedures consistent with Metropolitan Council requirements. Based • Discussion of funding options including available grant on the factors summarized above, this is anticipated to programs require relatively limited effort. 3.5 Bicycling and Walking Plan We will address Metropolitan Council requirements as defined in the Local Planning Handbook.This will include mapping existing and planned on-road and off- ,1$ road non-motorized facilities within Farmington.Based { it on the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Transportation 4/1,411# - 1 ii�l ' Policy Plan,there are currently three Tier 2 Regional - Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) corridors within - O_ 11 Farmington.These will be identified in mapping within s , the 2040 Farmington Transportation System Plan,and connections to the existing and planned City and County non-motorized systems will be addressed.We will also 3.9 Respond to Staff Comments on Preliminary Draft analyze and address the need for local bicycle and pedestrian We will respond to staff comments on the preliminary draft friendly improvements to provide connections that remove of the 2040 Farmington Transportation Plan.Our strategy major physical barriers on the RBTN and local networks per will be to minimize these comments by coordinating closely Metropolitan Council requirements. with City's Transportation Plan Project Manager throughout the preparation of the preliminary draft and provide updates 3.6 Aviation Plan and confer if there are questions regarding the City's desired The closest airport to Farmington is the Metropolitan approach. Airport Commissions'Airlake Airport in Lakeville,less than one mile west-southwest of Farmington. Requirements defined in the Local Planning Handbook will be met Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Transportation System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 12 Detailed Work Plan Task 4: Respond to Planning Commission Subtask 5.2 Draft ADA Transition Plan and City Council Comments/Prepare Final Bolton&Menk will set up a draft ADA transition plan to Documents use on City streets.We will also define additional tasks for 4.1 Finalize Full Transportation Plan further refinement of this plan.We anticipate the plan would After review by the Planning Commission and the full City involve an important inventory component but would focus Council of the Draft 2040 Transportation Plan,we will on standard guidelines to follow regarding ADA upgrades address comments these bodies may have.Any revisions for all City street reconstruction projects.We anticipate such required in this process would be subject to review by staff. guidelines would include: • Training for field staff regarding the importance of 4.2 Generate Transportation Chapter for Comprehensive Plan ADA compliance and associated documentation We will generate a shortened version of the 2040 procedures Farmington Transportation System Plan,which will serve • Field walks for all City construction/reconstruction as the Transportation chapter for the full 2040 Farmington projects during preliminary design including design and Comprehensive Plan.We will coordinate with HKGi to field personnel—review current ADA conditions and ensure consistent styles and formatting for this chapter. realistic design parameters for improvements • GIS-based documentation procedures Task 5:Alternate Items Subtask 5.1 Baseline Stop Sign Policy We have performed many reviews of requests for stop signs in a number of our client cities.In Farmington, like all communities,local residents and business can have misperceptions regarding the appropriate use and effectiveness of stop signs.Bolton&Menk will prepare a baseline stop sign policy to provide fair and uniform guidance on the procedures and policies to implement new stop signs (or potentially remove existing ones).This will include: • Detailed input from and consultation with City staff • Sound traffic engineering principals and widely accepted research • A systematic approach with educational components We will provide recommendations for refinements to the baseline Stop Sign Policy, as desired by the City. Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Transportation System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 13 Detailed Work Plan Fees Bolton&Menk will plan a system for the City of Farmington that is both resilient and cost efficient.The total cost of a project is not lowest when you sum a series of low bids; it is lowest when the upfront planning correctly identifies the best technology or plan for a system and then implements that.More money can be saved with thoughtful planning than any other phase of a project.Bolton &Menk will work with you on this project with the best planning approach in mind to get you true value. Client:City of Farmington Project:Transportation System Plan Update Bolton&Menk,Inc. ✓ t C c t m on 0 u v o a iv c .� v c c a v t .Q v c n c o a v� °c° v `o c m °c° n t0 Totals Costs n co i , c a t -- w _ c w Taskc a ~CO n No. Work Task Description ~ I ~ 1.0 Project Management 1.1 Communication and Administration 6 8 _--- 14 $1,880.00 2.0 Meetings 2.1 Kick-Off/Staff Meetings 3 12 15 $1,860.00 2.2 City Council/Planning Commission Meetings 3 9 3 15 $1,980.00 2.3 Public/Plannin:Commission O.en House Meetin:s 9 2 2 8 21 $2,373.00 3.0 Prepare Draft Transportation Plan 3.1 Introduction/Goals and Objectives 2 2 4 8 $766.00 3.2 Existing Roadway Conditions 2 2 4 12 20 $2,014.00 3.3 Future Roadway System Plan 2 16 4 4 16 12 54 $6,290.00 3.4 Transit Plan 1 2 2 5 $493.00 3.5 Bicycling and Walking Plan 2 4 4 10 $962.00 3.6 Aviation Plan 1 2 3 $285.00 3.7 Freight Plan 1 2 4 7 $651.00 3.8 Implementation Plan 2 2 4 4 12 $1,272.00 3.9 Res.ond to Staff Comments on Prelimina Draft 4 4 2 10 $1,008.00 4.0 Respond to Planning Commission&City Council Comments/Prepare Final Documents 4.1 Finalize Full Trans.ortation Plan 2 2 4 4 -- 12 $1,272.00 4 2 Generate Transportation Chapter for Comprehensive 4 4 4 4 16 $1,608.00 Plan Total Hours 12 61 25 28 40 16 40 222 Average Hourly Rate $160.00 $115.00 $155.00 $98.00 $85.00 $100.00 $104.00 Fees $1,920 $7,015 $3,875 $2,744 $3,400 $1,600 $4,160 Total Base Fee $24,714.00 5.0 Alternate Items 5.1 Baseline Stop Sign Policy 4 4 4 12 $1,480.00 5.2 Draft ADA Transition Plan 4 4 2 6 16 $1,850.00 Total Fee with Alternate Items $28,044.00 Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Transportation System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 14 f' BOLTON & M E N K 0 J Real People. Real Solutions. `°A p4ST'A PROM, Proposal for City of Farmington Water System Plan Update April 14, 2017 Submitted by: Bolton &Menk, Inc. 12224 Nicollet Avenue ■ Burnsville,MN 55337 ar'17'Ilcitor, F:952-890-8065 Contact: Seth Peterson,RE.,C:612-805-5223 sethpe@bolton-menk.com - ` - - _ 11 iin 111:d 1:1 Table of Contents Firm Profile 1 Goals and Objectives 2 Background and Experience 3 Detailed Work Plan 8 References 12 i y Background and Experience I1 I , . The benefit of having an accurate water model for the City - gi -- — is the abilityto use the model to look at various scenarios, `� ' such relocating piping andshutting down waterm_ We canas use the model to see whatshuttimpacts proposed ains. ' improvements may have on the water system.These > ` t • evaluations are done quickly, allowing design staff to sort ,'.�T _ - through various scenarios efficiently and fully understand _ •'"' _ --= :" implications to the water system. north system well house and south system water treatment Similarities to Farmington facility were in need of improvements. Bolton&Menk updated the City's water model and evaluated water usage data and growth to determine water treatment and Preliminary analysis of both systems was completed storage needs.In addition,we developed Capital Improvement by Bolton & Menk including hydraulic analysis. It was Plans for the City. determined several water interconnects could be removed as they were redundant and only added extra cost and confusion to the water systems.For the final design phase, Key Personnel improvements consisted of modifying and improving chemical feed systems,valve replacements, piping replacements, new coatings, HVAC improvements, and The Bolton & Menk team is intended to serve as an electrical and control improvements. extension of City staff, maintaining close coordination between the City's project coordinator and project team at all times.The proposed team provides the optimum The chemical feed improvements met Minnesota Department of Health requirements and design standards combination of accessibility, community knowledge, and and improved operator safety.All of these upgrades specialized expertise.Our team will be led by our Project Manager, Seth Peterson, who will be supported by key improved the operation and maintenance of both facilities. individuals and support staff. Bolton & Menk has the ability to draw upon more than 450 other team members Similarities to Farmington throughout our firm,as needed,to meet Farmington's needs Created and updated the City's water model and completed a for the Water Plan Update.Project team member bios are Water System Plan that evaluated improvements to the existing included here. Full resumes are available upon request. system and the need for adding additional well capacity.The City has implemented most of the improvements detailed in the ,.=M1.. Brian Hilgardner, P.E. Water System Plan. VI - Client Service Manager will responsible for overseeing Comprehensive Water System Plan, Cityof "..* the quality of services to ensure the City is Coon Rapids, Minnesota completely satisfied.He will monitor progress, Bolton & Menk updated the City of Coon Rapids' schedule,and budget,and work closely with existing water system model and converted the model to Seth to ensure critical issues are addressed in a timely manner. new modeling software, allowing additional modeling Brian has a history of successfully working with two and outputs for the City's water system.The model was current City of Farmington staff—Katy Gehler and John calibrated using existing field data.From the new model, Schmeling—in their previous positions. Bolton & Menk was able to evaluate system pressures, available fire flows,and watermain rehabilitation work.As Since beginning his career in 1998,Brian has gained part of the overall study, Bolton & Menk evaluated water a range of experience in project administration from treatment and water storage. From these evaluations, we conception through construction. His background includes developed both 5-and 10-year Capital Improvements Plans water distribution systems and development and design for the City's water system. of municipal reconstruction projects including street Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Water System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 5 Background and Experience construction,sanitary sewer systems,lift stations,stormwater .w Steve Nelson, P.E. collection systems,and pedestrian facility construction.His A, Project Engineer administrative duties have included preliminary engineering - reports,cost estimates,preliminary and final design, Steve will be responsible for assisting with the presentations,attendance at city council meetings,bidding completion of the water system plan and has assistance,and construction administration.He is also an completed many water system plans. expert in trenchless technology techniques. Steve has extensive experience in the planning, design, inspection,and construction administration of public works Seth Peterson, P.E. projects involving water supply,distribution,storage, • Project Manager/Principal-in-Charge and treatment. He began the practice of engineering in 1989. Steve's design and process experience includes fe Seth will serve as Project Manager and the multiple treatment plant designs and renovations (for both primary City contact.He will maintain close groundwater and surface water plants);well and well coordination with the City of Farmington and house designs;pump stations;water system modeling and provide overall management of the project team, planning; water treatment plant process optimizations (for schedule,cost,quality,and scope management processes. both municipal and industrial clients);filter maintenance Seth is a registered professional engineer and began evaluations; tracer tests;process selection and pilot plant with Bolton&Menk in 1995.He serves as the Metro work; and the reduction of corrosion,taste, odor, and Environmental Manager for Bolton& Menk. His biological regrowth problems in distribution systems.Steve background includes planning and design of water and has experience with treatment process technologies such wastewater treatment facilities,water and wastewater as reverse osmosis, ozone,activated alumina, biological studies,securing permits,working with regulatory filtration,lime softening,and radium reduction using agencies,and construction management.In addition, Seth HMO. He has worked with both industrial and municipal has extensive experience with all aspects of water and clients and has been involved in studies for the AWWA wastewater treatment including well design,tower design, Office of Government Affairs and the AWWA Research water treatment facility design,wellhead protection plans, Foundation. lift station design, lift station rehabilitation,wastewater treatment design, and wastewater treatment facility Morgan Salo, EIT permitting,and planning. Design Engineer Herman Dharmarajah, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE Morgan will assist with writing the Plan,data QA-QC/Technical Resource 4. , data . icm severalcollectionSupplyand Plans analysisin 2016,MH willopletedsNr be Herman will be responsible for providing QA-DC working on the DNR Water Supply Plan. e for all as ects of the lan as well as technical P P Morgan began his profession as a Design Engineer with assistance on all project phases. Bolton &Menk in 2015.His responsibilities include design Herman is a Principal Environmental Engineer at Bolton& and construction management of municipal water and Menk.He is experienced with the management,design,and wastewater treatment facilities.He has gained experience construction of water and wastewater treatment facilities, in environmental engineering through involvement in a performing these projects since 1982.He also supervises number of water and wastewater projects.His experience and provides technical assistance to staff design engineers, includes construction and rehabilitation of water and designers,drafting personnel,and construction management wastewater treatment facilities,lift stations,sanitary staff. Herman has conducted numerous pilot tests for sewer extensions,and creation of operational documents various systems to reduce the levels of radium in their for facilities.His responsibilities on project review and water.He was also a Principal Investigator for the National design have included cost estimates;data entry and review; Surface Water Study,which evaluated more than 40 water creation of standard operation procedures and operations treatment plants throughout the United States. In addition, and maintenance manuals; shop drawing review; and site Herman was the process engineer for the first reverse inspection. osmosis water treatment facility in the State of Minnesota. Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Water System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 6 Background and Experience Mitchell Swanson, EIT Jane Kansier,AICP `, Water Modeling/Design Engineer ., Senior Urban Planner C Mitchell will be responsible for updating the Jane will ensure a quality Comprehensive existing model and currently runs multiple water System Plan Update is provided and is models and various scenarios for these models. well integrated with additional comprehensive Mitchell is an Environmental Design Engineer who joined planning. Bolton &Menk in 2015. He is responsible for assisting Jane began her planning career in 1984 and has worked in with project design,preparation of plans and specifications, city and county planning, city administration, and public construction observation for wastewater facilities,water transit. She has extensive experience in the coordination and wastewater reports, data collection, and analysis and development of comprehensive plans, zoning of pilot water treatment studies. His responsibilities ordinances, city codes, site plan and development review, as a construction observer have included construction grant writing,and project management. Her primary inspection, record keeping, as-built drawings, and general duties include project management for services related to on-site coordination between the owner and contractor. municipal planning, metropolitan area comprehensive plan Mitchell's responsibilities on design projects include water development, and land use analysis and impacts. supply plans,water system studies,wastewater operation and maintenance manuals, and wastewater facility plans. Tyler Johnson, CFM tT0 GIS Scripting Specialist i Tyler will be responsible for developing GIS- .."4. related tools and maintaining consistency between the City's GIS database and the water model. Tyler is a GIS Specialist who began his career in 2005. He provides GIS expertise to internal and external clients and assists with database development, data analysis, and advanced map development and layout.Prior to joining Bolton &Menk in 2015,Tyler was a GIS Research Analysis Specialist with the Minnesota Department of Revenue and also worked as a GIS Analyst with the Iowa Flood Center.Tyler has worked with various water models and provided GIS based figures correlating to the water model. During his career,Tyler has gained extensive experience with environmental applications of GPS, GIS, and remote sensing. He has used Python scripting to automate We promise every client two things: we ll workflows and extend GIS functionality.He has worked on a variety of projects that include floodplain inundation work hard for you and we'll do a good job. production and mapping,data and LiDAR analysis,E911 address geocoding,orthorectification,and georeferencing. Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Water System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 7 �1 BOLTON Detailed Work Plan 1 & M E N K section 4 Real People.Real Solutions. 1.1111 Farm,ngt0 a ia ft i 1, n y �� Detailed Work Plan project is designed to provide: Detailed Work Plan • Project management • Technical expertise A successful Comprehensive Water System Plan relies on a • Updating water model complete understanding of the City's issues and resources, • GIS interaction as well as the culture that makes Farmington unique. Below • Proven experience is our approach to developing a sustainable plan that can be supported by the community and its stakeholders. The following approach will meet the goals and objectives of the Water System Plan Update for the City of Sustainability Farmington.The proposed work plan has been broken into Our team will Sustainable Solution six primary tasks needed to develop the requested plan. implement a Sustainable ��e� TECyy, Decision-Making Task 1: Project Kick-Off Meeting Approach to address o �� The project kick-off meeting will be a time for project team the goals of the Water '" members to meet with City staff and discuss project goals System Plan Update by and objectives and discuss in detail the completion of the including an evaluation ;, water model and reports. During the kick-off meeting,we of key elements such as a W will establish lines of communication between the project Technically Feasible, team and the City of Farmington.We will also discuss the Economically Viable, *02, •k'�` items needed from our data request as part of Task 2. MPAneLE Pug\-\t‘. Environmentally Compatible, and .. ...W.."' Task 2: Request and.Review Information Publicly Acceptable. from City In this task we will request information and data from the A Technically Feasible plan includes one that builds upon City for completing the two reports.A summary of the plans already completed,establishes technical objectives information we will request will include: based on sound planning and engineering principles, and • City population projections based on Metropolitan applies experience to find flexible and feasible solutions. Council System Statements • Maps of City including overall water system, current An Economically Viable plan will be sensitive to the land use, proposed land use, current zoning, elevation existing infrastructure and how it can best be used to serve contours future development and adapt to climatological changes. • As-builts of existing storage, supply, treatment, distribution system, etc. (to be provided as necessary An Environmentally Compatible plan identifies sensitive and available) features of the community in order to protect and accentuate • Water pumping records environmental, historic, and cultural resources while • Water billing records meeting future needs to support redevelopment. • Water quality data • Past Water Comprehensive Plans A Publicly and Politically Acceptable plan identifies and • Past Emergency and Conservation Plans involves stakeholders early in the decision-making process, • General information as available listens and understands issues,and informs and maintains • Current water model communication. Task 3:Analyze and Evaluate Data Our Approach In this task we will analyze and evaluate the data received The City of Farmington can be confident in Bolton& from the City and use that data to determine the following: Menk's policy to staff all major projects using a team • Analyze consumption trends for residential and approach, maintaining close coordination between the City commercial/industrial uses and determine current and our team at all times.The team assembled for this average demand for each type use Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Water System Ran Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 8 Detailed Work Plan • Determine average demand per type of use for design following figures/maps to be incorporated into the updated years and ultimate saturation of the proposed service Water System Plan: area based on analysis of current and proposed land use • Existing Average Day and Peak Hour Pressure and zoning Contours • Develop individual projections of future consumption • Existing Maximum Day Available Fire Flow Contours for any high-volume water users as identified by the • Proposed Average Day and Peak Hour Pressure City or Task 1 Contours • Determine maximum daily and peak hourly demands • Proposed Maximum Day Available Fire Flow Contours for the design years based on historical water use • Pipe and Node Map • Review the fire protection rating(ISO classification) for the City and determine maximum fire flow The City indicated you would like to update the model to a requirements; make recommendation regarding GIS-based water model. Bolton&Menk uses InfoWater,a upgrading the City's ISO classification as it relates to GIS-based water modeling software and we can update the the water system City's existing water model to this GIS-based system for an • Evaluate water quality characteristics at the wellheads additional fee. Ultimate cost would be determined by the with respect to current and proposed drinking water ease on which the model is imported into InfoWater,which regulations with the Minnesota Department of Health is dependent on the quality of the GIS data provided by the and the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act; analyze City. impacts of these regulations on the City's water supply • Based on City staff input and proposed state and federal Task 5: Prepare Report requirements,perform an evaluation of the well supply In this task,Bolton&Menk will update and provide new and treatment needs, including identifying options information for the Water System Plan.The updated Plan to address concerns raised by the DNR regarding the will have,at a minimum,the following content: sustainability of the aquifers and need to use alternate • Executive Summary sources • Planning estimates,assumptions,and projections • Recommendations regarding improving the ISO Task 4: Update Water Model Classification Bolton&Menk will update the water model to reflect new • Results of water quality analysis and impacts of developments and piping networks within the City.We will current and proposed state and federal drinking water conduct additional hydrant testing to allow us to calibrate regulations the water system. Once we have a fully calibrated water • Deficiencies of existing water system and model,we will use the model to determine the following: recommendations regarding improvements and/or • Update the computer model of the water distribution operational changes system using Water CADD; evaluate the adequacy of • Findings and conclusions from technical and economic the existing distribution system as well as the ability to analysis function under future demand scenarios • Recommended future improvements to supply, • Use the calibrated water model to evaluate current treatment,storage, and distribution system deficiencies in the City's water system with respect • Recommended sources of funding improvements to pressure,available fire flow,etc.;use an extended • Future CIPs period simulation (EPS) in the model to analyze operations and balance of the existing tower(s). The data and information from Tasks 3 and 4 will • Use the calibrated water model and EPS scenarios to provide the backbone of the Water System Plan.Based evaluate and make recommendations regarding the on this information, Bolton &Menk will develop Capital type,locations and sizing of future supply,treatment Improvement Plan items for a 20-year period and use this and storage facilities; identify any additional facilities to make recommendations for water rate changes to ensure (booster stations) or trunk watermain improvements the City is planning for future improvements. and extensions needed to serve future service areas Additionally,much of the information compiled in this From the updated water model,we will also produce the section will be used by the City to complete the DNR Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Water System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 9 Detailed Work Plan Water Supply Plan,which is due in October 2017. Bolton to discuss additional points or key items.This document is &Menk has completed several of the DNR Water Supply an important planning document and we feel meetings like Plan updates for other communities and we are available these are key to allowing City staff to have buy-in with the to provide feedback and assistance to the City as you process and develop a full understanding of the work being complete the document. completed. Because of our close proximity to the City of Farmington,we are able to easily meet at times that are Task 6:Attend Various Meetings convenient for City staff. Multiple meetings will be required for this project. The RFP and addendum lists the minimum meeting requirements,which we have included in our fee estimate. However, based on our discussion with City staff,we , understand we will be meeting with the Water Board - i.� jt, 1 and not the City Council. Besides the kick-off meeting, -, the RFP lists three additional meetings with City staff as - r we progress through the plan and modeling updates.We - _ I� ! expect these three meetings will be enough to progress Armee through the update of the plan and water model update. _.--*a`', i However,we also understand there may be more meetings Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Water System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 10 Detailed Work Plan Fees Bolton&Menk will plan out a system for the City of Farmington that is both resilient and cost efficient.The total cost of a project is not lowest when you sum a series of low bids; it is lowest when the upfront planning correctly identifies the best technology or plan for a system and then implements that. More money can be saved with thoughtful planning than any other phase of a project. Bolton&Menk will work with you on this project with the best planning approach in mind to get you true value. Client:City of Farmington Bolton&Menk,Inc. Project:Water System Plan Update o_ — v c a, V v v a) � `^ 1 C L vRI CJ = a, CO c c Vi c c '3 y U o N c w w l7 � c .L Totals Costs Task a c vy v v a, n I ro a u ro I c '° I N No. Work Task Description 2 �_.1 u a .L. 0 �____ _ 1 Project Kick-Off Meeting 1 Project Kick-Off Meeting 2 2 4 $710.00 2 Request and Review Information from City 2 Request and Review Information from City 2 1 3 6 2 1 1 , 16 $2,380.00 3 Analyze and Evaluate Data 3 Analyze and Evaluate Data 2 2 6 12 1 1 1 25 $3,835.00 4 Update Water Model 4 U.date Water Model 2 2 2 14 4 l 24 $3,480.00 5 Prepare Report 5 Update City's Water System Plan 2 4 2 6 16 4 2 2 38 $5,690.00 6 Attend Various Meetings 6a Water Board Workshop 2 _ 1 3 $580.00 6b Water Board Meeting 2 1 3 $580.00 6c Planning Commission Meeting 2 1 3 $580.00 6d Planning Commission Public Hearing 2 1 3 $580.00 6e Miscellaneous Meetings with City Staff 3 3 6 $1,155.00 4 24 48 11 4 4 125,. 1 Av... .-_—. $195.00 $250.00 $160.00 $190.00 $125.00 $115.00 $130.00 $60.00 Subtotal $4,095.00 $2,250.00 $640.00 $4,560.00 $6,000.00 $1,265.00 $520.00 $240.00 Total Fee $19,570.00 Submitted by Bolton&Menk,Inc. Water System Plan Update I City of Farmington,Minnesota 11 4irAR,�►►, , City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 „mea'$ www.c i.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Katy Gehler, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Approve 2017 Trail Crack Sealing Agreement-Engineering DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION The trail maintenance Capital Improvement Plan(CIP),which was approved by the city council on March 3, 2014 includes fog sealing and crack sealing of approximately 10 miles of trails as shown on the attached map. Fog sealing is accomplished in conjunction with the Joint Powers Agreement(JPA)for Street Maintenance which is administered by Burnsville and was approved earlier this spring. Trail crack sealing is not included in this JPA and therefore bid as a separate contract. Inspection of the trail segments scheduled for maintenance in 2017 identified two sections of trail that need more substantial repairs or complete replacement due to roots or significant tripping hazards. Staff will review the costs of these replacements and determine if the trail portion of the maintenance fund can support these costs. This work would come forward at a later meeting. DISCUSSION This year,we are anticipating approximately 15,000 linear feet of crack sealing on the trails. Quotes for this year's crack sealing were solicited from several contractors. The following table shows the results of the solicitation: Contractor Unit Price LF Total Bid All Things Asphalt $0.340 $5,100 Gopher State Seal Coat Inc. $0.430 $6,450 MN Asphalt Maintenance $0.449 $6,735 Fahrner Asphalt Sealers $0.560 $8,400 American Pavement Solutions $0.580 $8,700 Astech Corp $0.580 $8,700 Based on the quotes received, staff is recommending that the city accept the low quote of$5,100.00 from All Things Asphalt and award the contract for trail crack sealing to them. This is the same contractor who did the trail crack sealing in 2015 and 2016. BUDGET IMPACT The cost for trail crack sealing is included in the 2017 trail maintenance budget. ACTION REQUESTED By motion, accept the quote from All Things Asphalt in the amount of$5,100.00 and authorize execution of a contract for this work. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description ❑ Exhibit 2017 Trail Maintenance Map 2017 Farmington Trail Maintenance fif" .yea RFpa[lati'4RiC,ra r "1. a `t , ate•a••ak L' 4 -i l 1 , i l 3 iSz i e scre i\,-t 1+.‘...- 4 .. 1- t �kv �djRTM"; i t 3.p y y :4:4.t 4404{�i �i W - '-,,\' ' , iii A,;(.• (__ - - �. '��fr'- le 1 bf7 i T,t lItt t 1 t y is ` 7l 1 •} a . s .. .r „ ,, , • � T Y � y� ,+ + aC li•t tom, l `. l�.•`' / -r • j f q - Y'1 lit5 •41:1\ — i� `SFr ��r„ tt,.., Y' 1 P dLSy ,T, S�y" Aa \ �� ice, \ \ a ja `ar- / / \�� s 1, \ -. 1.-4.0:..,2 �i ] 4 r.y I la t7c, :,.._.,_ \ 1 2017 Trail Maintenance t . „- Z Trail Maintenance Areas - �',`- � ' ; et Major Cross Streets °iiii;—f J 44,7.•A PAO,^S I Parks u.•-` ' . v-AL_it . ;a: :A. ..—. 13 .•_c —I This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one.This drawing is a compilation of records, information,and data located in various city,county,and state offices and other sources and is to be used for reference purposes only. The city of Farmington is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. io��c9►i� City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota { 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 .,, www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Appointment Recommendation Liquor Operations-Human Resources DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of a part-time liquor clerk has been completed. DISCUSSION After a thorough review by Liquor Operations and the Human Resource Office, a contingent offer of employment has been made to Keith Revels, subject to ratification by the city council. Mr. Revels meets the qualifications for this position. BUDGET IMPACT Mr. Revel's starting hourly rate will be$11.41 which is the first step in the salary range for this position (salary range: $11.41 -$13.37). Funding for this position is authorized in the 2017 budget. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the appointment of Keith Revels as a part-time liquor clerk effective on or about May 16, 2017. (04i/4 City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 ►.,,,„ora' WWW.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Acknowledge Retirement Municipal Services-Human Resources DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION The city has received notice that Mr. Wayne Van Guilder will retire from his position as Solid Waste Operator effective June 9, 2017. DISCUSSION The Human Resources Office has received notification that Mr. Wayne Van Guilder will retire from his position as Solid Waste Operator effective June 9, 2017. Mr. Van Guilder began employment with the City of Farmington on June 3, 2003 and has been valued member of the city organization. The city appreciates his commitment to the organization and wishes him well in his future endeavors. Staff does intend to fill this position in order to continue to provide efficient service delivery. BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Acknowledge the retirement of Mr. Wayne Van Guilder effective on June 9, 2017 and authorize city staff to start the recruitment process for this position. City of Farmington (4tkRif*; 430 Third Street c f - :u'c Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 •.,,Nod' www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Approve Seasonal Hiring-Human Resouces DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of the attached list of summer seasonal staff has been completed. DISCUSSION After a thorough review by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Human Resources Office, offers of employment have been made to the individuals show on the attached spreadsheet, subject to a pre- employment drug test and ratification by city council. BUDGET IMPACT These positions are included in various departmental budgets. ACTION REQUESTED By motion approve the attached seasonal employment recommendations. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material Seasonal Staff 2017 Spring/Summer Seasonal Staff 2017 Name Pay Rate Pos/Step RETURNING ARENA AND PARK MAINTENANCE STAFF Luke Johnson $ 10.07 Step 3-Arena Supervisor $ 10.16 Step 2-Park Maintenance Adam Roschen $ 10.32 Step 3-Arena Supervisor $ 10.44 Step 2-Park Maintenance RETURNING RECREATION STAFF Breanna Raske $ 9.25 Step 2- Recreation Assistant Derek Cole $ 9.25 Step 2-Recreation Assistant $ 10.18 Step 2-Tennis Instructor Ryan Newton $ 10.13 Step 2-Lifeguard $ 10.13 Step 2-Water Safety Assistant Kaitlyn Besler $ 10.13 Step 2- Lifeguard $ 10.13 Step 2-Water Safety Assistant Amelia Hein $ 10.13 Step 2-Lifeguard $ 10.13 Step 2-Water Safety Assistant Mari Dougherty $ 10.13 Step 2-Lifeguard $ 10.13 Step 2-Water Safety Assistant Ethan Monroe $ 10.13 Step 2- Lifeguard $ 10.13 Step 2-Water Safety Assistant Jamie Ellis $ 10.13 Step 2-Swim Bus Supervisor $ 9.25 Step 2-Concession Worker Lauren Ellis $ 10.77 Step 2-Assistant Pool Supervisor $ 10.77 Step 2-Water Safety Instructor $ 10.13 Step 2- Lifeguard Autumn Brule $ 9.00 Step 1-Recreation Assistant Anna Palodichuk $ 9.25 Step 2-Recreation Assistant Claire Youngkrantz $ 9.00 Step 1-Recreation Assistant Emily Rubins $ 9.00 Step 1-Recreation Assistant foAR#i , City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota '9r 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 •A NW,, www.c i.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Brian Lindquist, Police Chief SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Declaring Surplus Property-Police DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION In accordance with MN State Statute 16A.695, a public officer or agency shall not sell any state bond financed property unless the public officer or agency determines by official action that the property is no longer usable or needed by the public officer or agency to carry out the governmental program for which it was acquired or constructed, the sale is made as authorized by law, the sale is made for fair market value, and the sale is approved DISCUSSION The following items are no longer in service and will be listed for sale on a public auction site: 2-Zetron Model 3030 PSAP TDD 1-Sony Time Lapse VHS Recorder 1-MV99 Multivision Pro Multiplexer 1-SMV 909 P Multivision Pro Multiplexer 1-Computer Rack System for Multiplexers 1-Office Jet H470 Printer 1-WV-CM 1020 Panasonic Video Monitor SSM-14NIV Sony Monitor 1-Emerson VHS 2-Panasonic AG TL 350 Recorders 1-Pelco TLR 3040 Time Lapse Recorder 1-Motorolas Command Star Lite Radio Council 1-Steel Case 4 station Desk Module 1-HP LaserJet 4100 TN 10-PBT's breath testers and approx. 2000 straws 15-P anasonc CF30 Tough Books 3-CF 18 Panasonic Tough Books 18 office chairs BUDGET IMPACT All items will be offered up for sale on the public auction site,www.govdeals.com All proceeds will be returned to the general fund. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the resolution declaring surplus property in the police department. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description Cover Memo Resolution RESOLUTION NO. R34-17 DECLARING SURPLUS PROPERTY IN POLICE DEPARTMENT • Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the CityhCouncil of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the council chambers of said city on the 15t day of May, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Larson, Bartholomay, Craig Members Absent: Bernhj elm, Donnelly Member Bartholomay introduced and Member Craig seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Police Department has recommended that miscellaneous items be declared surplus; and WHEREAS,the city has an opportunity to offer surplus items for sale through an online public auction at GovDeals.com. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the city of Farmington hereby declares the attached list as surplus equipment and authorizes the City Administrator and/or his designee to sell and/or dispose of said equipment. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 15th day of May, 2017. Mayor Attested to the/s qday of May, 2017. City Administrator SEAL Surplus Items Police 2—Zetron Model 3030 PSAP TDD 1 —Sony Time Lapse VHS Recorder 1 —MV99 Multivision ProMultiplexer 1 — SMV 909P Multivision Pro Multiplexer 1 —Computer Rack System for Multiplexers 1 —Office Jet H470 Printer 1 —WV-CM 1020 Panasonic Video Monitor SSM-14NIV Sony Monitor 1 —Emerson VHS 2—Panasonic AG TL 350 Recorders 1 —Pelco TLR 3040 Time Lapse Recorder 1 —Motorolas Command Star Lite Radio Council 1 — Steel Case 4 Station Desk Module 1 —HP LaserJet 4100 TN 10—PBT's Breath Testers and approximately 2000 Straws 15—Panasonic CF30 Tough Books 3 —CF 18 Panasonic Tough Books 18 office chairs if City of Farmington 430 Third Street ca zoo Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 —Amore www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Robin Hanson, Finance Director SUBJECT: Approve Bills-Finance DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION Attached are the April 27-May 10, 2017 check and automatic payments payments for your consideration. DISCUSSION NA BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED Approve the attached payments. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description o Backup Material 04-27-17-05-10-17 Council Check Register with Autopays R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 1 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139423 4/7/2017 115547 AMERICAN WATER WORKS 1.00 REFUND PERMIT#40564 154763 REFUND 1000 2420 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEB)1000 PERMIT#40564 49.50 REFUND PERMIT#40564 154763 REFUND 1001 4315 PLUMBING&HEATING PERMITS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 01000 01 PERMIT#40564 50.50 139427 417/2017 108446 ASPEN MILLS 2,093.40 FD-HI VIZ JACKETS(OFFICERS) 154761 195299 1060 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 218.50 FD-OFFICER HATS AND CAPS 154762 195300 1060 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 2,311.90 139430 4/7/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 27.39 UNIFORMS 154734 754699795 1072 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 27.40 UNIFORMS 154736 754702435 1072 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 27.40 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154771 754707726 1072 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 27.75 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154772 754705051 1072 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 31.37 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154772 754705051 1090 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 30.95 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154771 754707726 1090 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 30.95 UNIFORMS 154736 754702435 1090 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 30.95 UNIFORMS 154734 754699795 1090 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 234.16 139435 4/7/2017 100041 DAKOTA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXATION 908.00 DAKOTA COUNTY TIF MAINTENANCE 154460 2016 TIF 1021 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL ACCOUNTING 01000 02 MAINTENANCE 908.00 139436 4/7/2017 108967 DICK'S VALLEY SERVICE INC 185.00 TOW CHARGE 17000269 154740 176888 1051 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 71.50 TOW FOR 909 154726 176939 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 256.50 139437 4/7/2017 107008 DISTAD,RANDY 56.71 MARCH 2017 MILEAGE 154803 20170331-DISTAD 1094 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT PARK&RECREATION ADMIN 01000 09 56.71 139438 4/7/2017 114949 DVS REGISTRATION 16.00 TAB RENEWAL F#0581 154711 TAB RENEWAL F#0581051 6234 VEHICLE LICENSES,TAXES,FEE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 16.00 139439 4/7/2017 100022 FARMINGTON PRINTING INC 196.00 BUSINESS CARDS 154743 11271 1010 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 196.00 139446 4/7/2017 111773 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS,LLC R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 2 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 39.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154741 IN1537777 1010 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 26.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154742 IN1539795 1010 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 1.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154749 IN1540246 1010 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 67.19 139449 4/7/2017 114167 JONES&BARTLETT LEARNING,LLC 4,662.00 FD-HAZ-MAT TEXTBOOKS 154793 3593877 1060 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 4,662.00 139450 4/7/2017 100080 KEEPRS INC 387.00 LESS LETHAL ROUNDS 154758 337127 1051 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 387.00 139451 417/2017 111268 LUTZ,CHRISTOPHER 24.24 K9 TRAINING LUNCHES 154699 20170327-LUTZ 1051 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 24.24 139452 4/712017 115396 MACQUEEN EMERGENCY GROUP 75.34 FD-ENGINE 1 REPAIRS 154756 P00126 1060 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 373.55 FD-ENGINE 1 PUMP PRIMER REPAIR 154757 W00046 1060 6510 1 OUTSIDE VEHICLE REPAIR FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 448.89 139453 417/2017 111035 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 828.00 RRC ST CLOUD THEATER TOUR 154776 20170411-TOUR 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 828.00 139454 4/7/2017 112331 MIDWEST ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGIES 5,293.14 20160405 ELECTRICAL PERMITS 154826 20160405 1000 2020 CONTRACTS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEE)1000 ELECTRICAL PRMTS 5,293.14 139456 4/7/2017 110692 MOBILE MINI,INC 55.94 WARMING HOUSE RENTAL 154702 9001914797 1090 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 55.94 139458 4/712017 101249 MULLER,CYNTHIA 49.53 MILEAGE ELECTION MEETING 154700 20170310-MULLER 1010 6480 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 23.91 MILEAGE ELECTION MEETING 154700 20170310-MULLER 1013 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT ELECTIONS 01000 01 73.44 139459 4/7/2017 108225 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES,INC 285.25 FD LEATHER BOOTS(MOE) 154751 IN1113850 1060 6290 1 TURNOUT GEAR FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 285.25 139461 4/7/2017 102644 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY 1,442.46 FD-LED LIGHT UPGRADES#4780 154752 43361 1060 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 1,442.46 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 3 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139462 4/7/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL .44 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 1015 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS CITY HALL 01000 01 175.91 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 1015 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS CITY HALL 01000 01 10.96 CARPET REPAIR SUPPLIES 154770 K07277 1015 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE CITY HALL 01000 01 7.99 NUTS/BOLTS/NAILS&WIPES 154739 K06960 1031 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS BUILDING INSPECTIONS 01000 07 9.99 OUTLET&GFCI TESTER 154747 7009/F 1031 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS BUILDING INSPECTIONS 01000 07 83.77 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 1050 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 .25 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 1050 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 4.12 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 1060 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 209.43 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 1060 624D BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 86.43 FD-STATION 2 MEZZANINE PAINT 154750 6899-1 1060 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 84.45 FD-STATION 2 MEZZANINE PAINT 154753 K07097 1060 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 16.99 FD-ENGINE 1 REPAIR(#4781) 154778 K07319 1060 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 15.98 FD-STATION 1 HAND CLEANER 154782 K07254 1060 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 24.99 FD TRAINING KEROSENE 154788 A62328 1060 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 16.99 FD-ELECTRICAL PLUG IN FOR TRCK 154792 K07170 1060 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 51.90 FD OFFICE SUPPLIES 154348 K06999 1060 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 7.92 NUTS/BOLTS/NAILS 154717 K06791 1072 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 4.29 ZIP TIES 154718 K06777 1072 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 .80 BUIDLING REPAIR 154746 K06861 1072 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 .02- ICE REPAIR RETURN 154764 K07295 CR 1072 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 .14 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 154765 K07291 1072 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 .52 CAULK FOR MECH ROOM 154744 K06976 1072 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 .30 BUIDLING REPAIR 1/2"GALV 154745 K06876 1072 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 29.32 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 1072 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 .08 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 1072 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 53.91 CONCRETE MIX 154797 K07146 1072 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 28.97 PAINTING SUPPLIES&SPOUT 154794 K07104 1076 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS NATURAL RESOURCES 01000 07 1.86 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 154765 K07291 1090 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 .79 BUIDLING REPAIR 154746 K06861 1090 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 .30 BUIDLING REPAIR 1/2"GALV 154745 K06876 1090 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 .53 CAULK FOR MECH ROOM 154744 K06976 1090 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 .04- ICE REPAIR RETURN 154764 K07295 CR 1090 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 1.06 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 1090 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 92.15 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 1090 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 93.94 GLOVES&CASTER PLATE 154730 K06937 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 33.64 EQUIPMENT BOX PAINT 154733 K06800 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 29.99 ROPE FOR VETS MEMORIAL 154737 6922-1 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 35.62 EQUIPMENT BOX PAINT 154738 K07062 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 12.59 BOLTS,NUTS,WASHERS 154774 K07202 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 41.89 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 1093 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 .76 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 1093 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 RS5CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 4 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 4.99 GARAGE DOOR OPENER BATTERY 154795 K07108 1093 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 29.77 NUTS/BOLTS/NAILS&GLUE 154719 56323 1093 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 7.99 PATCH CONCRETE 154720 K07020 1093 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 1,314.65 139464 4/712017 103766 PITNEY BOWES-PURCHASE POWER 2,304.80 POSTAGE JAN'17 154715 000-9000-1062-6343 1014 6445 POSTAGE COMMUNICATIONS 01000 01 JAN'17 2,304.80 139466 4/7/2017 112561 RICOH USA,INC 889.00 COPIER LEASES APR-MAY'17 154779 98493301 1010 6555 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 889.00 139467 4/7/2017 112632 RICOH USA,INC 141.01 COPIER MAINTENANCE FEB-MAR'17 154704 5047735801 1010 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 11.25 COPIER MAINTENANCE FEB-MAR'17 154705 5047669383 1010 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 290.15 COPIER MAINTENANCE FEB-MAR'17 154706 5047649502 1010 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 442.41 139471 4/7/2017 103228 SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP 180.00 FIRE ALARM-POLICE DEPT 154701 83442177 1050 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 180.00 139473 4/7/2017 111333 TITAN ENERGY SYSTEMS 435.00 GENERATOR TEST SERVICE 154785 140318-010 1015 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE CITY HALL 01000 01 3,394.81 GENERATOR REPAIR 154789 170310-021 1015 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE CITY HALL 01000 01 561.00 FD-EMERG GENERATOR STAT 2 154754 161123-033 1060 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 4,390.81 139475 4/712017 113269 UNIVERSITY OF MN,REGENTS OF 400.00 MAR'17 PD RANGE RENTAL 154755 0470001336 1051 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 400.00 139478 4/7/2017 100645 WESTWOOD SPORTS 1,638.00 SOFTBALLS FOR ADULT SOFTBALL 154777 09-11430 1095 6570 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVI/D1000 09 1,638.00 139480 4/7/2017 100041 DAKOTA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXATION 46.00 DOCUMENT RECORDING 154461 P484467/ 1010 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 DOC#3178930 46.00 139481 4/1412017 100011 ANDERSEN INC,EARL F 348.40 STREET SIGNS 155009 0113657-IN 1072 6254 SIGNS&STRIPPING MATERIALS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 348.40 139484 4/14/2017 110262 SAAR,SONDRA R55CKS2 LOGI5601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 5 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No DU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 14.34 BACKGROUND INV TRAINING MEAL 154952 20170405-BAAR 1050 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 14.34 139489 4/14/2017 115553 BUDROW,JOHN 51.82 FIRE SCHOOL MEALS-4 DAYS 154869 20170303-BUDROW 1060 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 51.82 139492 4/14/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 27.40 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154829 754710339 1072 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 30.95 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154829 754710339 1090 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 58.35 139496 4/14/2017 109182 DAKOTA COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 18,533.33 MAY 2017 DCC FEES 154885 FA2017-05 1051 6560 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 9,266.67 MAY 2017 DCC FEES 154885 FA2017-05 1060 6560 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FIRE SERVICES 01000 D6 27,800.00 139497 4/14/2017 100041 DAKOTA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXATION 3,699.12 ANNUAL VOTING EQUIP MAINT 154914 03012017FMTN 1013 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS ELECTIONS 01000 01 3,699.12 139498 4/14/2017 109892 DAKOTA FIRE CONTROL INC 328.18 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 1015 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL 01000 01 328.18 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 1050 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 328.18 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 1060 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 32.82 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 1070 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING SERVICES 01000 07 32.82 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 1090 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 328.18 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 1,378.36 139503 4/1412017 100022 FARMINGTON PRINTING INC 48.00 PARK&REC COLORED PAPER 154902 11296 1095 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION PROGRAM SERVIID1000 D9 48.00 139511 4/14/2017 113579 KIENBERGER,ADAM 45.00 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE&LUNCH 154873 20170130- 1030 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PLANNING&ZONING 01000 03 KIENBERGER 45.00 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE&LUNCH 154874 20170221- 1030 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PLANNING&ZONING 01000 03 KIENBERGER 45.00 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE&LUNCH 154875 20170328- 1030 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PLANNING&ZONING 01000 03 KIENBERGER 135.00 139512 4114/2017 115548 KING,MICHAEL 35.00 HASTINGS ELEC PERMIT 154931 HASTINGS ELEC 1000 2255 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHE®1000 PERMIT R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 6 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 35.00 139514 4/14/2017 111268 LUTZ,CHRISTOPHER 22.19 K-9 TRAINING MEALS 154876 20170405-LUTZ 1051 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 22.19 139516 4/14/2017 105967 MC MILLEN,CINDY 38.62 MILEAGE TO LOGIS-UB MEETING 154949 20170411- 1021 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT GENERAL ACCOUNTING 01000 02 MCMILLEN 38.62 139517 4/14/2017 100317 METRO PEST MANAGEMENT INC 65.20 FD-STATION 2 EXTERMINATOR 154882 37260 1060 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 64.45 FD-STATION 1 EXTERMINATOR 154883 37264 1060 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 129.65 139522 4/14/2017 102179 MURPHY,JAMES 14.23 BACKGROUND INV TRAINING MEAL 154951 20170517-MURPHY 1050 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 14.23 139524 4/14/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 103.44 PEST CONTROL JAN'17 154943 152127359/28379954 1015 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL 01000 01 1.61 PEST CONTROL JAN'17 154944 152126842/28367911 1072 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 2.15 PEST CONTROL JAN'17 154944 152126842/28367911 1090 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 107.20 139526 4/14/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL 19.37 BUILDING REPAIR MATERIALS 154830 K07378 1015 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS CITY HALL 01000 01 2.98 BUILDING REPAIR MATERIALS 154831 K07398 1015 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS CITY HALL 01000 01 22.35 139532 4/14/2017 112561 RICOH USA,INC 963.43 COPIER LEASES APR-MAY'17 154926 98528506 1010 6555 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 963.43 139533 4/14/2017 112632 RICOH USA,INC 151.68 COPIER SUPPLIES-STAPLES 154942 1069185674 1010 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 151.68 139534 4/14/2017 115041 SAND,HEATHER LEE 125.00 SILVER AND FIT INSTRUCTOR 154832 20170329 MAR'17 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 125.00 139536 4/14/2017 100100 STREICHER'S 2,240.00 POLICE DEPT GUN CLEANER 154886 11249225 1051 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 2,240.00 139537 4/14/2017 102247 SUNDGREN,MARK R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 7 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 15.D0 BACKGROUND INV TRAINING MEAL 154953 20170405- 1052 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE INVESTIGATION SERVICES 01000 05 SUNDGREN 15.00 139538 4/14/2017 115567 THOMAS,MATTHEW 38.62 MILEAGE TO LOGIS-UB MEETING 154950 20170411-THOMAS 1021 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT GENERAL ACCOUNTING 01000 02 38.62 139541 4/1412017 109522 TRI-STATE BOBCAT INC 375.01 TOOLCAT PARTS 155010 P71006 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 375.01 139544 4/14/2017 115011 WOOTON,GINA 65.81 MILEAGE IGH&LASERFISCHE MTGS 154954 20170405-WOOTON 1050 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 65.81 139545 4/14/2017 113989 WRIGHT,BRITTANY 59.39 MILEAGE TO LOGIS&LASERFISCHE 154871 20170403-WRIGHT 1021 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT GENERAL ACCOUNTING 01000 02 59.39 139546 4/2112017 100028 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC 3,830.00 FD RADIO EQUIPMENT 155020 68096 1060 622D EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 3,830.00 139549 4/21/2017 113466 BARRIS,JODIE MARIE 40.00 RCC MAR'17 TAP CLASSES 155022 20170330 TAP 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 72.00 RRC ZUMBA CLASS MAR'17 155023 20170330 ZUMBA 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 112.00 139554 4/2112017 110991 BURNSVILLE SENIOR CENTER 16.90 RRC-CHOCOLATE&HEARTS EVENT 155090 032017 1093 6570 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 16.90 139555 4/21/2017 115573 CANNON FIRE&SAFETY 29.25 CANCEL PERMITS 40175&40745 155091 VOID PERMITS 1000 2020 CONTRACTS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHE®1000 1.00 CANCEL PERMITS 40175&40745 155091 VOID PERMITS 1000 2420 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHE®1000 64.34 CANCEL PERMITS 40175&40745 155091 VOID PERMITS 1001 4370 OTHER PERMITS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 01000 01 19.75 CANCEL PERMITS 40175&40745 155091 VOID PERMITS 1001 4327 ELECTRIC PERMITS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 01000 01 114.34 139560 4/21/2017 100241 DELEGARD TOOL CO 38.79 WORK GLOVES 155017 167511 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 38.79 139562 4/21/2017 109931 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO 208.30 BATTERIES FOR 531 AND 541 155015 1-Z10480 1051 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 208.30 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 8 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139563 4/21/2017 100022 FARMINGTON PRINTING INC 76.06 LIQ STORE-20#WHITE PAPER 155014 11307-1 1010 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 76.06 139569 4/21/2017 109232 HELM ELECTRIC INC 200.00 DISCONNECT/RECONNECT DESK 155082 12417B 1050 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 200.00 139571 4/21/2017 111773 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS,LLC 79.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 155025 IN1559995 1010 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 225.15 ENTER EXPLANATION 155019 IN1559259 1015 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS CITY HALL 01000 01 107.21 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155019 IN1559259 1050 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 268.03 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155019 IN1559259 1060 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 37.52 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155019 IN1559259 1072 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 117.93 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155019 IN1559259 1090 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 53.61 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155019 IN1559259 1093 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 889.06 139574 4/21/2017 108261 LAMETTRYS COLLISION LAKEVILLE 116.00 DAMAGE REPAIR FROM 17000316 155021 523113 1051 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 116.00 139584 4/21/2017 110206 MINNESOTA ZOO MOBILE 500.00 EARTH ARBOR CELEBRATION-ZOO 155093 6574 1095 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION PROGRAMSERVIID1000 09 325.00 4/28 ARBOR DAY ZOO ANIMALS 155105 6572 1095 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION PROGRAM SERVIO)10D0 09 825.00 139586 4121/2017 115503 MN.IT SERVICES 23.20 PD LANGUAGE LINE 16-3844 155088 W17020688 1051 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 23.20 139588 4/21/2017 115494 MOSHREFZADEH,MANDANA 250.00 RRC BALLOON ARTIST BALANCE DUE 155092 042517 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 250.00 139589 4/21/2017 112030 NAPA AUTO PARTS FARMINGTON 10.34 MOTOR SEAL FOR ROLLER 155096 168447 1072 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 10.34 139591 4/21/2017 102644 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY 1,806.00 FD ENGINE 1 LIGHT UPGRADE 4781 155013 43439 1060 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 1,806.00 139596 4/21/2017 111359 PHRANER,DEBBIE 190.00 FEB'17 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCTOR 155087 211 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 190.00 139597 4/21/2017 115572 PLAYWORLD SYSTEMS,INC R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 9 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 5,623.67 NORTHCREEK PLAYGROUND REPAIR 155095 AR214313 1090 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 5,623.67 139600 4/21/2017 115549 REFERRED PAINTING,INC. 3,272.00 PD PAINTING IN OFFICE/LOBBY 155055 360 1050 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 3,272.00 139601 4/21/2017 112561 RICOH USA,INC 187.39 COPIER LEASES MAY'17 155039 98595718 1010 6555 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 187.39 139602 4121/2017 115041 SAND,HEATHER LEE 50.00 AMP PROGRAM SPEAKER 155084 100 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 50.00 139604 4/21/2017 105724 SOUTH CENTRAL TECH COLLEGE 600.00 FD FIRE SCHOOL TRAINING FEES 155089 88465 1060 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 600.00 139605 4/21/2017 108220 SOUTH METRO RENTAL INC 822.97 FD NEW CONCRETE SAW 155024 78428 1060 6950 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 50.00 DIAMOND ASPHALT BLADE 155064 78452 1072 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 872.97 139607 4/21/2017 115544 SPEAKER WHO SINGS,THE 150.00 AMP MOTIVATIONAL SPEAKER 154877 20170329 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 150.00 139608 4/21/2017 100235 STERLING CODIFIERS INC 193.00 CITY CODE UPDATE 155097 19238 1010 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 193.00 139613 4/28/2017 100690 AKIN HILLS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 39.82 BOSCO FOOD-FEB'17 155149 187883 1051 6406 K-9 EXPENSE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 307.26 BOSCO VET BILL-FEB'17 155150 189322 1051 6406 K-9 EXPENSE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 42.84 BOSCO VET BILL-JAN'17 155151 187820 1051 6406 K-9 EXPENSE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 10.84 K-9 CAESAR VET BILL-MAR'17 155152 190175 1051 6406 K-9 EXPENSE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 16.98 K-9 CAESAR VET BILL-MAR'17 155153 190250 1051 6406 K-9 EXPENSE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 417.74 139614 4/28/2017 113236 ALLINA HEALTH 195.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT DRUG TESTING 155261 70001654 MAR'17 1011 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 01000 04 195.00 139622 4/28/2017 114075 BLACKFIRE CREATIVE DESIGNS 55.50 CITY OF FARMINGTON DOOR DECALS 155250 2052 1076 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS NATURAL RESOURCES 01000 07 79.00 CITY OF FARMINGTON DOOR DECALS 155250 2052 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 134.50 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 10 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139625 4/28/2017 100253 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 1,160.70 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155282 1852-000G MAR'17 1005 6403 LEGAL LEGISLATIVE CONTROL 01000 01 559.22 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155282 1852-000G MAR'17 1010 6403 LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 79.50 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155282 1852-000G MAR'17 1021 6403 LEGAL GENERAL ACCOUNTING 01000 02 449.10 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155282 1852-000G MAR'17 1030 6403 LEGAL PLANNING&ZONING 01000 03 63.60 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155282 1852-000G MAR'17 1050 6403 LEGAL POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 7,804.92 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155281 1852-999G MAR'17 1050 6403 LEGAL POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 79.50 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155282 1852-000G MAR'17 1076 6403 LEGAL NATURAL RESOURCES 01000 07 477.00 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155282 1852-000G MAR'17 1095 6403 LEGAL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVIID1000 09 10,673.54 139627 4/28/2017 107089 CANNON VALLEY PRINTING 3,566.24 SUMMER 2017 CNRG PRINT SERV 155156 FPR 36052 1094 6450 OUTSIDE PRINTING PARK&RECREATION ADMIN 01000 09 3,566.24 139628 4/2812017 100058 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 135.08 FRONT BEARING 304 155233 2131-435212 1031 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS BUILDING INSPECTIONS 01000 07 13.49 BATTERY BOX 155217 1596-259017 1060 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 39.09 SHOCKS FOR VEHICLE 724 155235 2131-436406 1070 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS ENGINEERING SERVICES 01000 07 39.09 SHOCKS 724 155224 2131-436413 1070 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS ENGINEERING SERVICES 01000 07 97.22 BRAKE PADS&ROTORS 155225 2131-436442 1070 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS ENGINEERING SERVICES 01000 07 28.00 LIGHTS FOR CHIPPER 155231 2131-434956 1076 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS NATURAL RESOURCES 01000 07 28.50 HYD FITTINGS FOR BEFCO 155227 2131-437166 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 25.20 OIL FILTERS 155228 2131-437424 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 14.43 HYDRAULIC FITTINGS FOR MOWER 155237 2131-437157 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 13.98 LIGHT BULBS FOR TOOLCAT 155218 2131-435020 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 110.26 BELTS/TENSIONER 155221 2131-435776 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 544.34 139631 4/28/2017 100133 DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SRVS 1,026.52 MAR'17 RADIO SUBSCRIBER FEES 155297 00024866 1051 6560 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 142.00 REPLACEMENT RADIO BATTERIES 155298 00024867 1051 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 1,978.80 RADIO EXTENDED WARRANTY 155299 00024868 1051 6560 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 2,010.00 RADIO EXTENDED WARRANTY 155300 00024869 1060 6560 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 1,259.82 MAR'17 RADIO SUBSCRIBER FEES 155297 00024866 1060 6560 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 6,417.14 139632 4/28/2017 110844 DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SRVS 179.61 JAN'17 DIESEL FUEL 155141 00024626 1060 6272 FUEL FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 331.51 MAR'17 DIESEL FUEL 155146 00024969 1060 6272 FUEL FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 434.30 FEB'17 DIESEL FUEL 155145 00024627 1060 6272 FUEL FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 986.70 FEB'17 DIESEL FUEL 155145 00024627 1073 6272 FUEL SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES 01000 08 1,359.37 MAR'17 DIESEL FUEL 155146 00024969 1073 6272 FUEL SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES 01000 D8 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 11 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 4,993.49 FEB'17 SALT&SAND 155142 00024628 1073 6253 STREET MATERIALS SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES 01000 08 9,802.77 MAR'17 SALT&SAND 155143 00025002 1073 6253 STREET MATERIALS SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES 01000 08 3,003.37 JAN'17 DIESEL FUEL 155141 00024626 1073 6272 FUEL SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES 01000 08 89.47 JAN'17 DIESEL FUEL 155141 00024626 1076 6272 FUEL NATURAL RESOURCES 01000 07 297.85 MAR'17 DIESEL FUEL 155146 00024969 1076 6272 FUEL NATURAL RESOURCES 01000 07 266.92 FEB'17 DIESEL FUEL 155145 00024627 1076 6272 FUEL NATURAL RESOURCES 01000 07 112.10 FEB'17 DIESEL FUEL 155145 00024627 1090 6272 FUEL PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 21,857.46 139633 4128/2017 100081 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER COMPANY 41.06 PLAYGROUND REPAIR LUMBER 155272 1704-662252 1090 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 41.06 139640 4/28/2017 109458 FARMINGTON MUNICIPAL LIQUORS 200.00 20 YR EE REC GLENN M 155138 20 YR EE REC GLENN1011 7420 OTHER HUMAN RESOURCES 01000 04 M 200.00 139641 4/28/2017 106164 FEDDER,RON 40.00 RENEW MN DEPT LABOR&IND LIC 155213 20170426-FEDDER 1031 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE BUILDING INSPECTIONS 01000 07 40.00 139642 4/28/2017 111431 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 84.19 SAFETY JACKET 155262 0234471 1031 7420 OTHER BUILDING INSPECTIONS 01000 07 84.19 139643 4/28/2017 108760 FIRE SAFETY USA INC 537.50 FD-GAS MONITORING EQUIPMENT 155273 99030 1060 6950 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 537.50 139644 4/28/2017 112904 FLEETPRIDE TRUCK&TRAILER PARTS 566.97 STARTER MOTOR FOR 701 155247 83984603 1073 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES 01000 08 566.97 139645 4/28/2017 111067 FRONTIER AG&TURF 38.68 MOWER DECK PARTS 155240 P83252 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 38.68 139646 4/28/2017 115588 GERTEN,PETE 37.48 REPLACEMENT MAILBOX 155306 REPLACE MAILBOX 1073 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES 01000 08 37.48 139652 4/28/2017 110145 HIGH FIVE EVENTS 888.03 PD CORD ORGANIZERS 155264 4924 1050 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 888.03 139654 4/28/2017 110250 ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 1,028.92 ICMA MEMBERSHIP-MCKNIGHT 155155 383448 2017 1010 6460 SUBSCRIPTIONS&DUES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 12 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div RENEWAL 1,028.92 139656 4128/2017 100225 INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MGMTASSOCIATION 397.00 IPMA-HR AGENCY DUES 155214 INV-27717-S2B8J4 1011 6460 SUBSCRIPTIONS&DUES HUMAN RESOURCES 01000 04 397.00 139658 4128/2017 107414 JEFFERSON FIRE&SAFETY INC 2,918.56 FD-THERMAL IMAGING CAMERA 155285 236307 1060 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 2,918.56 139665 4/28/2017 100049 LOCAL GVMT INFO SYSTEMS ASSN. 2,096.00 LOGIS BILL-MAR'17 155278 43321 1011 6402 DATA PROCESSING HUMAN RESOURCES 01000 D4 3,890.00 LOGIS BILL-MAR'17 155278 43321 1021 6402 DATA PROCESSING GENERALACCOUNTING 01000 02 2,192.00 LOGIS BILL-MAR'17 155278 43321 1031 6402 DATA PROCESSING BUILDING INSPECTIONS 01000 07 1,930.00 LOGIS BILL-MAR'17 155278 43321 1050 6402 DATA PROCESSING POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 258.00 LOGIS BILL-MAR'17 155278 43321 1060 6402 DATA PROCESSING FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 10,366.00 139669 4128/2017 115396 MACQUEEN EMERGENCY GROUP 958.86 FD-ENGINE 1 VALVE LEAK REPAIR 155249 W00109 1060 6510 1 OUTSIDE VEHICLE REPAIR FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 958.86 139671 4/28/2017 115581 MARKET ON OAK 100.00 10 YR EE REC SONDRA BAAR 155139 10 YR EE REC 1011 7420 OTHER HUMAN RESOURCES 01000 04 SONDRA BAAR 100.00 139672 4/28/2017 114625 MASTER MECHANICAL,INC 32.27 CMF HVAC REPAIR 155271 47420D 1072 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 419.46 CMF HVAC REPAIR 155271 47420D 1090 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 451.73 139673 4/28/2017 109318 MC KNIGHT,DAVID 45.58 PHONE APR'17,FOOD 4 CNCL MTG 155157 20170430- 1005 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE LEGISLATIVE CONTROL 01000 01 MCKNIGHT 11.24 PHONE APR'17,FOOD 4 CNCL MTG 155157 20170430- 1010 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 MCKNIGHT 45.00 PHONE APR'17,FOOD 4 CNCL MTG 155157 20170430- 1010 6412 CELLULAR PHONES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 MCKNIGHT 101.82 139676 4/28/2017 100219 MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 270.00 QUARTERLY CJDN ACCESS FEE 155215 00000363780 1051 6411 TELEPHONE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 270.00 139680 4/2812017 113031 NRG RELIABILITY SOLUTIONS LLC c R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 13 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 1,370.22 LAW ENFORCE CNTR ELEC MAR'17 155270 3346-1704 1050 6422 ELECTRIC POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 60.72 CMF ELEC MAR'17 155275 3347-1704 1072 6422 ELECTRIC STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 121.42 CMF ELEC MAR'17 155275 3347-1704 1090 6422 ELECTRIC PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 1,552.36 139681 4/28/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 103.44 PEST CONTROLAPR'17 155059 155083927/28379954 1015 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL 01000 01 80.00 PEST CONTROL APR'17 155028 155083701/28594962 1050 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 1.61 PEST CONTROLAPR'17 155060 155083360/28367911 1072 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 2.15 PEST CONTROLAPR'17 155060 155083360/28367911 1090 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 187.20 139685 4/2812017 111359 PHRANER,DEBBIE 150.00 MAR'17 YOGA INSTRUCTOR 155244 215 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 150.00 139686 4/28/2017 111049 PIONEER SECURESHRED 240.00 SECURE ON-SITE SHREDDING 155284 30583 1021 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL ACCOUNTING 01000 02 240.00 139687 4/28/2017 110398 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SRV LLC 379.00 POSTAGE METER-MAY'17 155208 3101160451 1010 6555 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 379.00 139692 4/28/2017 102929 RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE 140.00 FIRE SCHOOL REGISTRATION 155287 002006SFS-34 1060 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 140.00 139699 4/28/2017 112422 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC 1,206.00 WATER SYSTEM EVAL FOR DEVEL 155210 1185282 1070 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING SERVICES 01000 07 1,206.00 139701 4128/2017 100286 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST 131.25 MAR'17 CLEAR SUBSCRIPTION 155263 835896713 1052 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INVESTIGATION SERVICES 01000 05 131.25 139703 4/28/2017 113269 UNIVERSITY OF MN,REGENTS OF 400.00 APR'17 RANGE USE FOR PD 155257 0430003241 1051 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 400.00 139705 4/2812017 113413 VERIZON WIRELESS 19.91 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 1011 6412 CELLULAR PHONES HUMAN RESOURCES 01000 04 19.89 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 1011 6412 CELLULAR PHONES HUMAN RESOURCES 01000 D4 326.75 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 1031 6412 CELLULAR PHONES BUILDING INSPECTIONS 01000 07 172.04 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 1031 6412 CELLULAR PHONES BUILDING INSPECTIONS 01000 07 1,242.76 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 1051 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 1,241.78 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 1051 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 14 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 560.16 MAR'17 DATA CARDS 155255 9782699496 1051 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 560.16 FEB'17 DATA CARDS 155256 9780898519 1051 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 315.11 MAR'17 DATA CARDS 155255 9782699496 1060 6412 CELLULAR PHONES FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 315.11 FEB'17 DATA CARDS 155256 9780898519 1060 6412 CELLULAR PHONES FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 50.71 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 1060 6412 CELLULAR PHONES FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 50.66 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 1060 6412 CELLULAR PHONES FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 121.42 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 1070 6412 CELLULAR PHONES ENGINEERING SERVICES 01000 07 120.76 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 1070 6412 CELLULAR PHONES ENGINEERING SERVICES 01000 07 331.32 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 1090 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 391.96 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 1090 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 86.86 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 1094 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PARK&RECREATION ADMIN 01000 09 70.02 MAR'17 DATA CARDS 155255 9782699496 1094 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PARK&RECREATION ADMIN 01000 09 70.02 FEB'17 DATA CARDS 155256 9780898519 1094 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PARK&RECREATION ADMIN 01000 09 86.91 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 1094 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PARK&RECREATION ADMIN 01000 09 6,154.31 139706 412812017 109514 WIGEN COMPANIES INC 29.55 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 155212 19981 1072 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 384.15 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 155212 19981 1090 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 413.70 139716 5/5/2017 110511 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 15.00 POOL PHONE BILL MAY'17 155509 0290159 MAY'17 1097 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS 01000 09 15.00 139717 515/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 26.05 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155441 754720835 1072 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 27.75 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155462 754712974 1072 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 26.05 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155483 754715578 1072 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 26.80 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155493 754718217 1072 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 30.27 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155493 754718217 1090 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 29.44 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155483 754715578 1090 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 31.37 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155462 754712974 1090 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 29.44 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155441 754720835 1090 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 227.17 139722 5/5/2017 108967 DICK'S VALLEY SERVICE INC 71.50 TOW SKIDSTER 155500 179601 1090 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 71.50 139723 5/5/2017 107008 DISTAD,RANDY 21.40 APR'17 MILEAGE&ROUTER 4 RRC 155379 20170428-DISTAD 1090 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 89.99 APR'17 MILEAGE&ROUTER 4 RRC 155379 20170428-DISTAD 1093 6950 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 39.59 APR'17 MILEAGE&ROUTER 4 RRC 155379 20170428-DISTAD 1094 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT PARK&RECREATION ADMIN 01000 09 150.98 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 15 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139726 5/5/2017 100022 FARMINGTON PRINTING INC 98.00 ENVELOPES FOR PD 155496 11363 1050 6450 OUTSIDE PRINTING POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 380.50 GROUNDPOUN/DEWRUN FLYERS 155484 11367 1095 6570 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVIID1000 09 478.50 139727 5/5/2017 108760 FIRE SAFETY USA INC 267.35 FD EXTRICATION EQUIPMENT 155479 99152 1060 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 267.35 139736 5/5/2017 111773 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS,LLC 112.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 155460 IN1573087 1010 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 200.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 155465 IN1571363 1010 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 33,84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 155458 IN1571368 1050 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 347.00 139738 5/5/2017 107414 JEFFERSON FIRE&SAFETY INC 5,344.75 FD THERMAL IMAGING CAMERA 155488 236474 1060 6950 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 5,344.75 139740 5/5/2017 101375 KUYPER,STEVEN A 26.24 CALIBRE PRESS TRNG LUNCHES 155380 20170425-KUYPER 1051 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 26.24 139742 5/5/2017 100438 LINDQUIST,BRIAN 106.90 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE,&PARKING 155552 20170426- 1050 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 LINDQUIST 45.00 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE,&PARKING 155552 20170426- 1051 6412 CELLULAR PHONES PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 LINDQUIST 151.90 139746 5/5/2017 113833 MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 2,400.00 2016 AUDIT PROGRESS BILLING 155474 41666 1021 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL ACCOUNTING 01000 02 2,400.00 139747 5/5/2017 102249 MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD 330.00 FD CERTIFICATION TEST FEES 155447 4744 1060 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 330.00 139749 5/5/2017 101249 MULLER,CYNTHIA 19.80 ELECTION TRAINING MILEAGE 155533 20170330-MULLER 1013 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT ELECTIONS 01000 01 5.99 ELECTION TRAINING MILEAGE 155533 20170330-MULLER 1030 6460 SUBSCRIPTIONS&DUES PLANNING&ZONING 01000 03 25.79 139752 5/5/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL .65 LUBRICANT 155482 K07685 1015 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE CITY HALL 01000 01 4.97 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 K87683 1015 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS CITY HALL 01000 01 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 16 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 7.99 FLOOR REPAIR CEMENT 155454 K07486 1015 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS CITY HALL 01000 01 2.37 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 1(87683 1050 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 33.96 PICTURE HANGERS 155457 K07588 1050 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 8.99 ADHESIVE WEATHER STRIP 155502 K07986 1051 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 5.92 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 K87683 1060 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 9.07 LUBRICANT 155482 K07685 1060 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 .13 LUBRICANT 155482 K07685 1072 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 .83 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 K87683 1072 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 24.99 BOLTS 155455 K07521 1072 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 19.99 D BATTERIES 155507 K08005 1072 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 3.90 NUTS,BOLTS,&NAILS 155503 K07980 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 4.80 BALLFIELD-NUTS/BOLTS/NAILS 155481 K07734 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 2.60 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 K87683 1090 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 .13 LUBRICANT 155482 K07685 1090 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 14.98 WD40&BATTERY 155461 K07537 1090 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 42.70 POLY&PAINT TRAY-BARRICADES 155463 K07602 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 2.49 KEYS FOR VETERANS MEMORIAL 155472 K07614 1090 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 27.78 TIES FOR BALL FENCE 155473 K07628 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 30.98 GLOVES-LATEX&LEATHER 155443 K08025 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 6.99 SAW BLADE 155452 K07448 1090 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 13.98 MASKING TAPE 155453 7420 1090 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 35.98 HDMI VIDEO CABLES 155476 K07650 1093 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 .13 LUBRICANT 155482 K07685 1093 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 68.97 SHOP LIGHT FOR GARAGE 155498 70440 1093 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 1.18 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 K87683 1093 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 377.45 139755 515/2017 115507 POLICE SERVICE DOGS,INC. 125.00 DOG COLLAR CHARGER 155456 20170407 1051 6406 K-9 EXPENSE PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 125.00 139756 5/5/2017 108048 PUSH PEDAL PULL 323.00 FITNESS EQUIPMENT INSPECTION 155475 136508 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 323.00 139758 5/5/2017 112632 RICOH USA,INC 15.86 COPIER MAINTENANCE MAR-APR'17 155437 5048172829 1010 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 147.45 COPIER MAINTENANCE MAR-APR'17 155448 5048192666 1010 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 01 163.31 139759 5/5/2017 100357 RIVERTOWN NEWSPAPER GROUP 67.43 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 155432 CL20083436 1030 6455 LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS PLANNING&ZONING 01000 03 40.46 ANNEXATION NOTICE 155433 CL20082604 1030 6455 LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS PLANNING&ZONING 01000 03 107.89 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 17 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139762 5/5/2017 110990 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION 587.55 ELEVATOR PREVENTIVE MAINTENANC 155442 8104522585 1015 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL 01000 01 587.55 . 20170401 4/3/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 8.03 CIV DEF SIREN ELEC FEB'17 154518 51-4874006 FEB'17 1054 6422 ELECTRIC EMERGENCY MGMT SERVICES 01000 05 5.08 CITY GARAGE ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 1072 6422 ELECTRIC STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 8.47 CITY GARAGE ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 1090 6422 ELECTRIC PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 21.58 20170402 4/12/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 2,491.68 CTY HALL/FRT BLDG ELEC MAR'17 154768 51-4874007-2 1015 6422 ELECTRIC CITY HALL 01000 01 MAR'17 253.48 PARK/WARM HOUSE ELEC MAR'17 154768 51-4874007-2 1090 6422 ELECTRIC PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 MAR'17 612.65 SENIOR CENTER ELEC MAR'17 154768 51-4874007-2 1093 6422 ELECTRIC SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 MAR'17 48.50 POOL ELEC MAR'17 154768 51-4874007-2 1097 6422 ELECTRIC SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS 01000 09 MAR'17 3,406.31 20170403 4/21/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 24.94 DUNB AVE WARM HOUS ELEC MAR'17 154915 51-9027188-0 1090 6422 ELECTRIC PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 MAR'17 24.94 20170404 4/4/2017 100085 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 5.00 CIV DEF SIREN FEB'17 154350 198227-1 FEB'17 1054 6422 ELECTRIC EMERGENCY MGMT SERVICES 01000 05 5.00 CIV DEF SIREN FEB'17 154351 226095-8 FEB'17 1054 6422 ELECTRIC EMERGENCY MGMT SERVICES 01000 05 519.68 FIRE DEPT 2 ELEC FEB'17 154344 397195-9 FEB'17 1060 6422ELECTRIC FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 31.50 TUNNEL LIGHT ELEC FEB'17 154394 546832-7 FEB'17 1090 6422 ELECTRIC PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 561.18 20170405 4/25/2017 100085 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 601.37 FIRE DEPT 1 ELEC MAR'17 154924 167948-9 MAR'17 1060 6422 ELECTRIC FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 35.22 PARK&REC SIGN ELEC MAR'17 154925 226047-9 MAR'17 1090 6422 ELECTRIC PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 636.59 20170407 4/18/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 352.07 POLICE DEPT GAS MAR'17 154927 0505974444 MAR'17 1050 6423 NATURAL GAS POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 601.84 FIRE DEPT STATION 2 GAS MAR'17 154905 0505001779 MAR'17 1060 6423 NATURAL GAS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 682.94 FIRE DEPT STATION 1 GAS MAR'17 154909 0506565319 MAR'17 1060 6423 NATURAL GAS FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 38.99 1ST STREET GARAGE GAS MAR'17 154910 0505547424 MAR'17 1072 6423 NATURAL GAS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 233.23 CMF GAS MAR'17 154913 0502362190 MAR'17 1072 6423 NATURAL GAS STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 362.80 CMF GAS MAR'17 154913 0502362190 MAR'17 1090 6423 NATURAL GAS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 18 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 60.66 1ST STREET GARAGE GAS MAR'17 154910 0505547424 MAR'17 1090 6423 NATURAL GAS PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 706.16 RRC GAS MAR'17 154907 0507948331 MAR'17 1093 6423 NATURAL GAS SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 3,038.69 20170409 4/24/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 1,421.94 CITY HALL GAS BILL MAR'17 155061 0505346885 MAR'17 1015 6423 NATURAL GAS CITY HALL 01000 01 23.70 MUNICIPAL POOL GAS MAR'17 155063 0506104181 MAR'17 1097 6423 NATURAL GAS SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS 01000 09 1,445.64 20170410 4/26/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 21.66 MUNICIPAL POOL GAS MAR'17 155062 0504796591 MAR'17 1097 6423 NATURAL GAS SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS 01000 09 21.66 20170412 4/7/2017 113546 TREASURE ENTERPRISE,INC 1,865.01 CITY HALL MAR'17 CLEAN SRVCS 154710 674 1015 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL 01000 01 10.63 CMF MAR'17 CLEANING SERVICES 154710 674 1072 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 14.17 CMF MAR'17 CLEANING SERVICES 154710 674 1090 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 786.51 RRC MAR'17 CLEANING SERVICES 154710 674 1093 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 2,676.32 20170413 4/18/2017 111046 VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 2.24 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 1015 6272 FUEL CITY HALL 01000 01 BLDG MNT 97.31 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG INSP 154896 MAR'17 869088237 1031 6272 FUEL BUILDING INSPECTIONS 01000 07 BLDG INS 1.35 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 1050 6272 FUEL POLICE ADMINISTRATION 01000 05 BLDG MNT 2,747.76 MAR'17 FUEL POLICE 154897 MAR'17 869088237 1051 6272 FUEL PATROL SERVICES 01000 05 POLICE 22.01 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 1060 6272 FUEL FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 BLDG MNT 741.05 MAR'17 FUEL FIRE DEPT 154884 MAR'17 869088237 1060 6272 FUEL FIRE SERVICES 01000 06 FIRE .45 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 1072 6272 FUEL STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 BLDG MNT 116.60 MAR'17 FUEL STREETS 154894 MAR'17 869088237 1072 6272 FUEL STREET MAINTENANCE 01000 08 ST/SNOW 161.76 MAR'17 FUEL SNOW 154894 MAR'17 869088237 1073 6272 FUEL SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES 01000 08 ST/SNOW 110.67 MAR'17 FUEL NAT RES 155083 MAR'17 869088237 1076 6272 FUEL NATURAL RESOURCES 01000 07 NAT RES 5.68 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 1090 6272 FUEL PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 BLDG MNT 500.85 MAR'17 FUEL PARKS 154941 MAR'17 869088237 1090 6272 FUEL PARK MAINTENANCE 01000 09 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 19 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div PARKS 46.28 MAR'17 FUEL RECREATION 155011 MAR'17 869088237 1093 6272 FUEL SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 REC 4.04 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 1093 6272 FUEL SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES 01000 09 BLDG MNT 4,558.05 01000 GENERAL FUND 188,492.50 139434 41712017 109077 DAKOTA COUNTY CDA 5,171.00 OPEN TO BUSINESS 2017 FEE 154707 20170328 2000 6570 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN102000 03 5,171.00 139511 4/14/2017 113579 KIENBERGER,ADAM 26.79 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE&LUNCH 154873 20170130- 2000 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN102000 03 KIENBERGER 39.16 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE&LUNCH 154873 20170130- 2000 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN102000 03 KIENBERGER 300.00 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE&LUNCH 154874 20170221- 2000 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN102000 03 KIENBERGER 69.62 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE&LUNCH 154874 20170221- 2000 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN102000 03 KIENBERGER 15.00 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE&LUNCH 154875 20170328- 2000 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN1D2000 03 KIENBERGER 99.63 CELL PHONE,MILEAGE&LUNCH 154875 20170328- 2000 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN102000 03 KIENBERGER 550.20 139625 4/28/2017 100253 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 127.20 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155280 1852-013G MAR'17 2000 6403 LEGAL HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN102000 03 883.60 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155283 1852-054G MAR'17 2000 6403 LEGAL HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN102000 03 1,010.80 139748 5/5/2017 115596 MNCAR 250.00 MNCAR MEMBERSHIP 2017 DUES 155531 2017636 2000 6460 SUBSCRIPTIONS&DUES HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN1D2000 03 250.00 139759 5/5/2017 100357 RIVERTOWN NEWSPAPER GROUP 22.48 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 155434 CL20082483 2000 6455 LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN1D2000 03 22.48 20170403 4121/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 19.68 ELM ST EDA SIGN ELEC MAR'17 154906 51-4874009-4 2000 6422 ELECTRIC HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN1D2000 03 MAR'17 19.68 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 20 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 02000 HRA/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 7,024.16 139435 4/7/2017 100041 DAKOTA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXATION 908.00 DAKOTA COUNTY TIF MAINTENANCE 154460 2016 TIF 2050 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TIF CITY CENTER DIST 2 02050 03 MAINTENANCE 908.00- DAKOTA COUNTY TIF MAINTENANCE 154460 2016 TIF 2050 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TIF CITY CENTER DIST 2 02050 03 MAINTENANCE 02050 TIF CITY CENTER DIST 2 4705 139435 4/7/2017 100041 DAKOTA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXATION 827.00 DAKOTA COUNTY TIF MAINTENANCE 154460 2016 TIF 2054 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRIDENT HOUSING TIF DIST 02054 MAINTENANCE 827.00 02054 TIF TRIDENT HOUSING DIST 14 827.00 139625 4/2812017 100253 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 27.80 LEGAL BILL MAR'17 155279 1852-003G MAR'17 2100 6403 LEGAL POLICE FORFEITURES 02100 05 27.80 139698 4/28/2017 111510 ST PAUL POLICE K-9 FOUNDATION 8,500.00 NEW PD K-9 155125 20170307-ZAGGY 2100 6406 K-9 EXPENSE POLICE FORFEITURES 02100 05 8,500.00 02100 POLICE DONATIONS&FORFEITURES 8,527.80 139733 5/5/2017 100395 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC 542.50 PRAIRIE PINES PARK MP SERVICES 155459 016-069-4 2329 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRAIRIE PINES PARK 02300 09 542.50 02300 PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND 542.50 139433 4/7/2017 112888 COOL AIR MECHANICAL,INC 200.50 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 154786 1873 2502 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 200.50 139462 4/7/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL .84 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 2502 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 188.48 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 2502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 75.95 CLEANING SUPPLIES 154735 K06812 2502 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 21 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 9.99 WALL CLEANER 154773 K07248 2502 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 30.97 PAINTING SUPPLIES 154784 K07105 2502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 14.99 RINK BOARD REPAIR SUPPLIES 154787 K07148 2502 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 321.22 139498 4/14/2017 109892 DAKOTA FIRE CONTROL INC 328.18 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 2502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 328.18 139504 4114/2017 100077 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 68.84 ARENA ALARM LINE MAR-APR'17 154828 6514633016APR'17 2502 6411 TELEPHONE ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 68.84 139526 4/1412017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL 79.46 PAINTING SUPPLIES 154827 K07408 2502 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 79.46 139571 4/2112017 111773 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS,LLC 241.23 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155019 IN1559259 2502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 241.23 139593 4/21/2017 115566 OLSON,SUEZETTE 42.00 PUNCH CARD REFUND 155066 PUNCH CARD REFUNP501 4820 OPEN SKATE ICE ARENA REVENUE 02500 09 42.00 139599 4/21/2017 100125 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC 56.00 ZAMBONI BLADE SHARPENING 155018 0062108-IN 2502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 56.00 139611 4/21/2017 111032 WALL,JANELLE 8.86 LEARN TO SKATE SUPPLIES 155037 LEARN TO SKATE 2502 6570 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 MAR'17 8.86 139752 5/5/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL 26.99 TOOL BOX 155450 K07468 2502 6950 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 44.95 CLAMP,HOOK PEGS,&MULTI TOOL 155451 K07466 2502 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 14.29 NUTS,BOLTS,NAILS,PAINT BRSH 155464 K07607 2502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 30.42 PAINT 155470 K07677 2502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 15.97 SKATE ROOM DRYWALL REPAIR 155471 K07638 2502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 1.17 LUBRICANT 155482 K07685 2502 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 22.97 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155490 K07824 2502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 3.99 PAINT SUPPLIES 155491 K73782 2502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 26.99 SPRAYER 155492 K07761 2502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 5.32 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 K87683 2502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 193.06 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 22 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 20170402 4112/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 4,140.15 ICE ARENA ELEC MAR'17 154768 51-4874007-2 2502 6422 ELECTRIC ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 MAR'17 4,140.15 20170407 4/18/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 1,753.33 ARENA GAS MAR'17 154911 0502346011 MAR'17 2502 6423 NATURAL GAS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 1,753.33 20170413 4/18/2017 111046 VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 4.49 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 2502 6272 FUEL ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPE 02500 09 BLDG MNT 4.49 02500 ICE ARENA 7,437.32 139725 5/5/2017 100364 EHLERS&ASSOCIATES INC 5,000.00 ARBITRAGE CALCULATIONS 155440 73357 3091 7130 FISCAL AGENT FEES 2013A GO IMP REFUNDING BO 03091 02 5,000.00 03091 2013A GO IMP REFUNDING BONDS 5,000.00 139637 4/28/2017 100364 EHLERS&ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 ARBITRAGE CALCULATIONS-FINAL 155251 73351 3095 7130 FISCAL AGENT FEES 2008 GO IMP BNDS 03095 02 4,000.00 03095 2008 GO IMP BNDS 4,000.00 139637 4/28/2017 100364 EHLERS&ASSOCIATES INC 2,000.00 ARBITRAGE CALCULATIONS-FINAL 155252 73350 3096 7130 FISCAL AGENT FEES 2010C GO STREET CONSTRUCT03096 02 2,000.00 03096 2010C GO STREET CONSTRUCTION 2,000.00 139637 4/28/2017 100364 EHLERS&ASSOCIATES INC 2,000.00 ARBITRAGE CALCULATIONS-FINAL 155252 73350 3300 7130 FISCAL AGENT FEES 2010D ARENA EQUIPMENT CER 03300 02 2,000.00 03300 2010D ARENA EQUIPMENT CERTIF 2,000.00 139425 4/7/2017 100193 APPLE VALLEY,CITY OF 5,000.00 LEGAL COST-FRONTIER FRANCHISE 154703 5881 4005 2010 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE MANUAL CABLE/COMMUNICATIONS PROA4000 01 257.09 CABLE SUPPLIES 154714 5883 4005 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CABLE/COMMUNICATIONS PRO,04000 01 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 23 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 5,257.09 139482 4/14/2017 100193 APPLE VALLEY,CITY OF 14,814.06 CABLE JPA 2ND QTR 154887 5820 4005 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CABLE/COMMUNICATIONS PR0,04000 01 14,814.06 04000 CAPITAL ACQUISITION 20,071.15 139489 4/14/2017 115553 BUDROW,JOHN 26.45 FIRE SCHOOL MEALS-4 DAYS 154869 20170303-BUDROW 4302 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE FIRE RELIEF 04300 06 26.45 139734 5/5/2017 115521 INC STORES,LLC 318.88 FIRE STATION 2 GYM FLOORING 155438 1192366 4302 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE FIRE RELIEF 04300 06 318.88 04300 FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS 345.33 139443 4/7/2017 101945 HAPPY HARRY'S FURNITURE 777.00 BOOKCASES FOR RISTOW LIBRARY 154708 20170329 4502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS RRC CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT F 04500 09 777.00 139592 4/21/2017 109335 NOVAK,TED 125.00 PUZZLE TABLE COFFEE GUYS 155085 041017 4502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RRC CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT F 04500 09 125.00 139667 4128/2017 115584 LYNDON,LEE 35.00 CRAFT SHOW REFUND 155211 041917 4502 5355 DONATIONS RRC CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT F 04500 09 35.00 04500 RECREATION CAPITAL PROJECTS 937.00 139536 4/14/2017 100100 STREICHER'S 21,403.00 POLICE DEPT-17 RIFLES 154938 11256855 5602 6950 50 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT-POLICE GEN CAPITAL EQUIP FUND EX 05600 21,403.00 139744 5/5/2017 115593 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 44,509.00 F-550-BUCKET TRUCK 155549 112202 5602 6940 VEHICLES GEN CAPITAL EQUIP FUND EX 05600 44,509.00 139745 5/5/2017 101374 MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 2,935.54 F#0738 FORD F550 V#33264 155439 F#0738 FORD F550 5602 6940 VEHICLES GEN CAPITAL EQUIP FUND EX 05600 V#33264 2,935.54 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 24 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 05600 GENERAL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND 68,847.54 139465 4/7/2017 110760 PRO-TECH DESIGN SECURITY SOLUTIONS 1,992.07 DURESS AND LOCKOUT BUTTONS 154775 79434 5731 6950 00430 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 05700 1,992.07 139651 4/2812017 108970 HENRICKSEN PSG 10,745.85 PD OFFICE FURNITURE ' 155154 614354 5731 6950 19500 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 05700 10,745.85 139664 4/28/2017 108496 LINN'S CARPET SERVICE 7,995.20 PD NEW CARPET-DEMO&INSTALL 155124 680780 5731 6401 19500 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 05700 7,995.20 139708 4/28/2017 100389 WOLD ARCHITECTS&ENGINEERS INC 2,295.13 ASSESSMENT OF CITY FACILITIES 155207 53002 5731 6401 00430 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 05700 2,295.13 139720 5/5/2017 110844 DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SRVS 1,677,924.18 195TH PROJ(CP64-22)2ND PYMT 155550 00025107 5700 2010 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE MANUAL MAINTENANCE FUND BALANCE 05700 07 1,677,924.18 139733 5/5/2017 100395 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC 1,664.77 RRC PLAZA DESIGN MAR'17 155467 016-051-1 5752 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT05700 1,664.77 05700 MAINTENANCE FUND 1,702,617.20 139426 417/2017 113303 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 408.75 BEER ORDER 154806 3168722 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 408.75 139428 4/7/2017 114472 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER,LLC 6,402.00 BEER ORDER 154689 1090689935 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,176.00 BEER ORDER 154760 1090691334 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 7,578.00 139431 4/7/2017 100071 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC 5,600.55 BEER ORDER 154690 100-210 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 308.38- BEER ORDER CREDIT 154691 100-211 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 6,591.31 BEER ORDER 154692 100-208 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 244.50- BEER ORDER CREDIT 154694 100-209 CR 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 11,638.98 139442 4/7/2017 100027 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION,LLC 226.94 POP ORDER 154503 3616202357 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 291.03 POP ORDER 154644 3616202358 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 25 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 517.97 139445 4/712017 100074 HOHENSTEINS INC 90.00 BEER ORDER 154695 885389 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 740.00 BEER ORDER 154807 886298 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 830.00 139447 4/7/2017 109846 J J TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MN INC 5,023.19 BEER ORDER 154808 2668633 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 5,023.19 139448 4/7/2017 100033 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 8.67- WINE ORDER CREDIT 154696 619196 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 20.00- E&J BRANDY CREDIT 154697 619197 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 227.02 SVEDKA VODKA ORDER 154809 5690885 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 201.62 WINE ORDER 154810 5690886 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,446.15 E&J BRANDY ORDER 154811 5690887 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 529.59 WINE ORDER 154812 5690888 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 4,131.79 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154813 5690889 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 675.80 WINE ORDER 154814 5690890 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 4,010.11 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154815 5690891 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 91.97 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154816 5690892 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,325.01 WINE ORDER 154817 5687631 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 14,610.39 139457 4/7/2017 107932 MOOD MEDIA 80.96 MOOD MEDIA SERVICES APR'17 154624 53109151 6110 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXI86100 02 80.96 MOOD MEDIA SERVICES APR'17 154624 53109151 6115 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 161.92 139462 4/7/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL 50.47 CLEANING SUPPLIES DT LIQ STORE 154727 K06892 6110 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXI06100 02 9.63 PK LIQ STORE GARBAGE BAGS 154780 K07181 6115 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 36.41 PAPER TOWELS FOR PK LIQ STORE 154709 K07413 6115 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 54.45 CLEANING SUPPLIES PK LIQ STORE 154727 K06892 6115 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 150.96 139463 4/7/2017 100034 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC 1,655.43 WINE ORDER 154818 2142148 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3.02 WINE ORDER 154819 2142078 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 905.14 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154820 2144331 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 398.05 WINE ORDER 154821 214432 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,961.64 139468 4/7/2017 100357 RIVERTOWN NEWSPAPER GROUP 21.12 NEWSPAPER SALES MAR'17 154804 58123 6110 5502 COST OF GOODS SOLD DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXI06100 02 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 26 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 40.92 NEWSPAPER SALES MAR'17 154805 58116 6115 5502 COST OF GOODS SOLD PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 62.04 139470 417/2017 107018 SHAMROCK GROUP 64.40 ICE CUBES 154147 2096676 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 69.90 ICE CUBES 154452 2096675 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 134.30 139472 4/7/2017 112051 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 181.90 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154822 1523909 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,387.61 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154823 1526626 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,569.51 139476 4/7/2017 113871 VAN PAPER COMPANY 189.98 BAGS FOR DT LIQ STORE 154729 418194-00 6110 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXIB6100 02 173.36 BAGS FOR PK LIQ STORE 154728 418196-00 6115 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 363.34 139477 417/2017 108808 VINOCOPIA 379.00 WINE,LIQ,&BEER ORDER 154698 0176787-IN 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 697.93 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154759 0176788-IN 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,076.93 139479 417/2017 100334 WINE MERCHANTS 1,106.61 WINE ORDER 154824 7126125 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 121.51 WINE ORDER 154825 7126697 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,228.12 139483 4/14/2017 113303 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 397.50 BEER ORDER 154841 3168624 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 397.50 139485 4/14/2017 100493 BELLBOY CORPORATION 118.05 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154833 58307900 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 101.10 LIQ SUPPLIES&MIXES 154955 95605200 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 336.15 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154973 58308000 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 234.11 LIQ SUPPLIES&MIXES 154974 95605300 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 13.00 LIQ SUPPLIES&MIXES 154974 95605300 6115 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 802.41 139486 4/14/2017 111280 BERNICK'S WINE 14.00 KLAR SOUR 154842 351641 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 161.35 BEER ORDER 154843 351642 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 40.00 MP ORANGE 154976 352747 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 215.35 139487 4/14/2017 114472 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER,LLC R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 27 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 3,680.70 BEER ORDER 154834 1090692715 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 9,261.43 BEER ORDER 154977 1090692716 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 12,942.13 139488 4114/2017 114471 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE&SPIRITS 1,357.69 LID,SPIRITS ORDER 154835 1080616917 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 41.45 WINE ORDER 154836 1080616918 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,822.43 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154956 1080619075 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,332.70 WINE ORDER 154978 1080616920 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,306.71 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154979 1080616919 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 7,860.98 139490 4/14/2017 108360 CANNON RIVER WINERY 120.00 WINE ORDER 154980 2988 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 120.00 139493 4/14/2017 100071 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC 118.45- BEER ORDER CREDIT 154837 100-258 CR 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 11,084.35 BEER ORDER 154838 100-257 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 29.53- BEER ORDER CREDIT 154981 100-256 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 14,368.80 BEER ORDER 154982 100-255 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 25,305.17 139505 4/14/2017 100074 HOHENSTEINS INC 513.80 BEER ORDER 154844 886299 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 643.10 BEER ORDER 154957 887516 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 383.00 BEER ORDER 154984 887517 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,539.90 139508 4/14/2017 113417 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 176.20 BEER ORDER 154845 49555 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 176.20 139509 4/14/2017 109846 J J TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MN INC 3,672.08 BEER ORDER 154846 2668631 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,734.97 BEER ORDER 154958 2668667 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 4,987.45 BEER ORDER 154985 2668666 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 103.00 REDD'S WICKED BLOOD ORANGE 154986 2668669 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 172.75 BEER ORDER 154987 2668665 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 12,670.25 139510 4/14/2017 100033 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 52.51 SVEDKA VODKA MANGO PINEAPPLE 154847 5687545 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,227.49 WINE ORDER 154848 5687544 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 121.51 NEW AMSTERDAM VDKA 154849 5687543 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 318.78 SVEDKA VODKA ORDER 154850 5690669 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 28 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 325.89 WINE ORDER 154851 5690670 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,810.37 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154852 5690671 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 601.01 WINE ORDER 154853 5690672 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 21.99 B&J EXOTIC BERRY 154854 5690673 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,198.20 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154855 5690674 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 586.20 WINE ORDER 154856 5690675 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,726.44 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154857 5690676 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 51.20 KINKY COCKTAILS PINK&BLUE 154858 5690677 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 77.02 CUERVO MIX MARG LIME 154859 5690678 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 123.51 SVEDKA VODKA RASPBERRY 154959 5696022 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 98.01 BLACK BOX CABERNET ORDER 154960 5696023 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,126.18 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154961 5696024 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 593.81 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154962 5696025 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 38.51 CUERVO MIX MARG LIME 154963 5696026 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 162.33 WINE ORDER 154964 5696027 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 93.76 NEWAMSTERDAM GIN ORDER 154965 5696028 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 297.57 WINE ORDER 154966 5696029 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 D2 21.99 B&J MARGARITA 154967 5696030 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 .25- WOODBRIDGE CHARDONNAY CREDIT 154988 594789 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 54.11- FRANZIA DARK RED CREDIT 154989 619839 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 86.50- LID&WINE CREDIT 154990 619657 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 101.50- E&J BRANDY CREDIT 154991 621184 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 37.51 COCO REAL ORDER 154992 5695930 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 21.99 B&J MARGARITA 154993 5695929 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 363.66 WINE ORDER 154994 5695928 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 113.43 E&J BRANDY ORDER 154995 5695927 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 268.10 WINE ORDER 154996 5695926 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 37.86 BLOODY MARY MIX 154997 5695925 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 D2 1,410.82 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154998 5695924 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,409.13 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154999 5695923 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,164.35 WINE ORDER 155000 5695922 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 123.51 SVEDKA VODKA MANGO PINEAPPLE 155001 5695921 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 21,382.28 139520 4114/2017 110248 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE ASSN 100.00 2017 BEVERAGE/ALCOHOL TRAINING 154690 2017-31 6110 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXI06100 02 100.00 2017 BEVERAGE/ALCOHOL TRAINING 154890 2017-31 6115 6470 TRAINING&SUBSISTANCE PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 200.00 139525 4/14/2017 100290 PAUSTIS&SONS WINE COMPANY 258.50 WINE ORDER 154860 8585385-IN 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 258.50 139527 4/1412017 100032 PEPSI COLA COMPANY R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 29 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 128.70 POP ORDER 154861 25872559 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 10.06- POP CREDIT 154862 25872560 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 118.64 139528 4/14/2017 113089 PETERSON,BLAIR 29.96 MILEAGE TO/FROM LIQ STORES 154870 20170331- 6110 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EX186100 02 PETERSON 29.96 MILEAGE TO/FROM LIQ STORES 154870 20170331- 6115 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 PETERSON 59.92 139529 4/14/2017 100034 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC 546.12 WINE ORDER 154839 2145951 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,116.30 WINE ORDER 154863 2142077 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 696.69 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154864 2144183 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 442.85 WINE ORDER 154865 2144184 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 674.92 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154968 2147787 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 190.54 WINE ORDER 154969 2147788 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 226.84 WINE ORDER 155002 2147786 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,360.57 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155003 2147785 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 6,254.83 139535 4/14/2017 112051 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 446.40 WINE ORDER 154866 1525241 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,532.90 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 154867 1526631 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,743.32 WINE&LIQ ORDER 154971 1529291 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,499.68 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155005 1529296 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 9,222.30 139540 4/14/2017 109709 TRIHUS,DAVID M 28.25 MILEAGE TO/FROM LIQ STORES 154872 20170331-TRIHUS 6110 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EX106100 02 28.25 MILEAGE TO/FROM LIQ STORES 154872 20170331-TRIHUS 6115 6485 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 56.50 139542 4/14/2017 108808 VINOCOPIA 261.00 WINE ORDER 154840 0177264-IN 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 296.38 BEER ORDER 155006 0177267-IN 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 557.38 139543 4/14/2017 100334 WINE MERCHANTS 1,425.10 WINE ORDER 154868 7126113 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 109.51 ANGELINE CA PINOT NOIR WINE 154972 7127638 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 241.51- WINE ORDER CREDIT 155007 713124 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,293.10 139547 4/21/2017 113303 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 30 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 41,25 BEER ORDER 155067 3170312 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 263,00 BEER ORDER 155068 3170198 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 660.00 BEER ORDER 155077 3170197 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 D2 964.25 139550 4/21/2017 115569 BOURGET IMPORTS,LLC 650,50 WINE ORDER 155069 140903 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 650.50 139551 4/21/2017 114472 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER,LLC 9,860,30 BEER ORDER 155070 1090695642 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,606,05 BEER ORDER 155080 1090695643 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 13,466.35 139552 4/21/2017 114471 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE&SPIRITS 1,372,30 WINE ORDER 155078 1080619079 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 865,75 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155079 1080619078 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,238.05 139559 4/21/2017 100071 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC 46.80- BEER ORDER 155071 100-295 CR 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 5,194.30 BEER ORDER 155072 100-294 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 5,147.50 139566 4/21/2017 100027 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION,LLC 334.82 POP ORDER 154983 3616202490 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 334.82 139570 4/21/2017 100074 HOHENSTEINS INC 176.00 HAMMS BEER ORDER 155106 888884 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 176.00 139572 4/21/2017 109846 J J TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MN INC 103.00 REDD'S WICKED BLOOD ORANGE 155073 2668668 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 7,994.90 BEER ORDER 155107 2668718 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 8,097.90 139573 4/21/2017 100033 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 115.50 E&J VANILLA BRANDY 155074 5697129 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 .26 WINE ORDER 155108 5701304 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 751.04 WINE ORDER 155109 5701521 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 24.60 KINKY COCKTAILS BLUE 155110 5701522 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 279.02 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155111 5701523 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 459.84 WINE ORDER 155112 5701524 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,150.84 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155113 5701525 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 684.42 WINE ORDER 155114 5701526 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 31 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 21.99 B&J FUZZY NAVEL 155115 5701527 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 37.51 MASTER MIXES STRAW DAQ&MARG 155116 5701528 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 4,525.02 139577 412112017 107747 M.AMUNDSON LLP 946.40 CIGARETTE&POP ORDER 155075 235739 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 946.40 139587 4121/2017 110219 MORGAN CREEK VINEYARDS 100.44 NOVA 155117 4365 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 100.44 139594 4/21/2017 100290 PAUSTIS&SONS WINE COMPANY 121.25 WINE ORDER 155076 8586203-IN 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 121.25 139595 4/21/2017 100034 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC . 702.37 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155118 2151563 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 224.53 WINE ORDER 155119 2151564 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 926.90 139603 4/21/2017 107018 SHAMROCK GROUP 47.60 ICE CUBES 154505 2101127 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 46.80 ICE CUBES 154679 2101126 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 43.20- ICE CUBE CREDIT 154970 2050551 CR 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 51.20 139606 4/21/2017 112051 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 4,012.82 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155120 1532031 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1.28 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155121 1532030 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 4,014.10 139612 4/21/2017 100334 WINE MERCHANTS 121.51 STEELHEAD CHARDONNAY 155122 7128601 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 121.51 139616 4/28/2017 113303 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 308.00 SURLY VARIETY BEER ORDER 155126 3171846 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 337.75 BEER ORDER 155177 3171750 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 32.00 PADDLE BLACK ALE 155178 3171751 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 359.00 SURLY VARIETY BEER ORDER 155307 3173363 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 64.00 PADDLE BEER ORDER 155308 3173362 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,100.75 139617 4/28/2017 115520 BALD MAN BREWING COMPANY 177.60 BEER ORDER 155179 E-1200 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 177.60 • R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 32 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139620 4/28/2017 100493 BELLBOY CORPORATION 132.94 LIQ SUPPLIES&MIXES 155127 95674300 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 396.45 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155128 58517200 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 529.39 139621 4/28/2017 111280 BERNICK'S WINE 674.00 BEER ORDER 155180 354044 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 674.00 139623 4/28/2017 114472 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER,LLC 4,775.35 BEER ORDER 155131 1090698405 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 7,332.10 BEER ORDER 155184 1090698406 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 12,107.45 139624 4/28/2017 114471 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE&SPIRITS 265.35 WINE ORDER 155129 1080623069 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,748.58 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155130 1080623068 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,124.63 BLUE CHAIR LIQUOR ORDER 155158 1080623440 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 174.25- SOUTHERN COMFORT CREDIT 155181 2080167659 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,200.83 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155182 1080623070 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 156.35 WINE ORDER 155183 1080623071 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 89.45 WINE ORDER 155313 1080626155 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,103.19 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155314 1080626154 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 9,514.13 139626 4/28/2017 108360 CANNON RIVER WINERY 360.00 WINE ORDER 155132 3067 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 360.00 139629 4/28/2017 100071 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC 52.90- BEER ORDER 155133 100-349 CR 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 5,606.65 BEER ORDER 155135 100-348 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 19.27- BEER ORDER CREDIT 155185 100-297 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 4,237.25 BEER ORDER 155186 100-296 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 9,771.73 139636 4/28/2017 100149 ECM PUBLISHERS,INC 113.00 LIQ STORE MAR'17 PAPER AD 155205 475070 6110 6492 ADVERTISING DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXI86100 02 113.00 LIQ STORE MAR'17 PAPER AD 155205 475070 6115 6492 ADVERTISING PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 226.00 139653 4/28/2017 100074 HOHENSTEINS INC 710.00 BEER ORDER 155160 890370 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 654.35 BEER ORDER 155187 888885 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,354.35 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 33 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139657 4/28/2017 109846 J J TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MN INC 4,731.24 BEER ORDER 155186 2668717 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 D2 2,433.48 BEER ORDER 155315 2668754 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 7,164.72 139659 4128/2017 100033 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 11.75- FISHEYE CHARDONNAY RETURN 155161 622169 CR 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 41.51- GALLO FV PINOT NOIR RETURN 155162 621714 CR 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 442.29 SVEDKA VODKA ORDER 155163 5706833 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 846.51 WINE ORDER 155164 5706834 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 24.60 KINKY COCKTAILS BLUE 155165 5706835 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 601.37 WINE ORDER 155166 5706836 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 327.03 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155167 5706837 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,944.24 LID,SPIRITS ORDER 155168 5706838 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 612.06 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155169 5706839 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 918.02 WINE ORDER 155170 57067840 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 21.99 B&J POMEGRANATE RASPBERRY 155171 5706841 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 115.50 E&J VANILLA BRANDY 155189 5697090 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,285.11 WINE ORDER 155190 5701310 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 272.78 NEWAMSTERDAM GIN&VODKA 155191 5701309 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,220.09 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155192 5701308 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 635.32 WINE ORDER 155193 5701307 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,702.31 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155194 5701306 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 49.20 KINKY COCKTAILS PINK&SUNSHIN 155195 5701303 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 332.90 WINE ORDER 155196 5701302 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 14,298.06 139668 4/28/2017 107747 M.AMUNDSON LLP 922.10 CIGARETTE&POP ORDER 155197 235740 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 922.10 139682 4/28/2017 100290 PAUSTIS&SONS WINE COMPANY 414.75 WINE ORDER 155198 8586921-IN 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 414.75 139683 4/28/2017 100032 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 150.40 POP ORDER 155137 95776860 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 150.40 139684 4/28/2017 100034 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC 664.53 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155172 2154978 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 135.03 WINE ORDER 155173 2154979 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 312.30 WINE ORDER 155199 2151416 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS- 06100 02 894.85 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155200 2151415 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 34 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 2,006.71 — — 139690 4/28/2017 114619 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION CO INC 261.50 RED BULL ORDER 155174 K-24403755 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 261.50 139693 4/28/2017 109722 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC 109.90 NORTH LAKE BEER ORDER 155136 IND013242 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 109.90 139696 4/28/2017 107945 SCHWINESS LLC 9,793.55 MAY'17 DT LIQ STORE RENT 155148 2171 6115 6556 BUILDING RENTAL PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 9,793.55 139697 4/28/2017 112051 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 2,918.53 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155176 1534722 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1.28 BACARDI RUM SUPERIOR WHITE 155201 1532036 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,557.05 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155202 1532037 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 5,476.86 139704 4/28/2017 113871 VAN PAPER COMPANY 228.11 PK LIQ STORE-BAGS 155206 420377-00 6115 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 228.11 139707 4/28/2017 100334 WINE MERCHANTS 106.51 WINE ORDER 155203 7128576 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 106.51 139710 5/5/2017 113303 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 427.00 SUMMIT VARIETY ORDER 155385 3173263 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 64.00 PADDLE BEER ORDER 155386 3173262 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 156.00 SURLY VARIETY BEER ORDER 155553 3174948 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 647.00 139711 5/5/2017 100493 BELLBOY CORPORATION 213.60 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155387 58517300 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 139.31 LIQ SUPPLIES&MIXES 155388 95674400 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 352.91 139712 5/5/2017 111280 BERNICK'S WINE 582.25 BEER ORDER 155389 356355 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 34.00 KLAR SOUR&MP ORANGE 155390 356354 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 171.55 BEER ORDER 155391 355220 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 787.80 139713 5/5/2017 114472 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER,LLC 5,748.25 BEER ORDER 155381 1090701207 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 10,539.60 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155393 1090701208 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 35 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 16,287.85 — — — 139714 5/5/2017 114471 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE&SPIRITS 3,290.67 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155392 1080626156 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 41.45 CRANE LAKE MERLOT 155554 1080629543 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,420.30 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155555 1080629542 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 4,752.42 139715 5/5/2017 108360 CANNON RIVER WINERY 384.00 WINE ORDER 155394 3076 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 384.00 139718 5/5/2017 100071 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC 12,240.60 BEER ORDER 155382 100-385 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 38.25- BEER ORDER CREDIT 155383 100-386 CR 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 11,272.65 BEER ORDER 155395 100-383 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,015.85 BEER ORDER 155396 100-346 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 39.40- BEER ORDER CREDIT 155397 100-384 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 40.95- BEER ORDER CREDIT 155398 100-347 CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 .01- BEER ORDER CREDIT 155399 100-297CR 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 26,410.49 139730 5/5/2017 100027 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION,LLC 396.14 POP ORDER 155159 3616202637 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 368.41 POP ORDER 155400 3616202635 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 764.55 139732 5/5/2017 100074 HOHENSTEINS INC 681.80 BEER ORDER 155401 890371 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 223.50 BEER ORDER 155556 891696 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 905.30 139735 5/5/2017 113417 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 156.00 BEER ORDER 155402 50354 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 156.00 139737 5/5/2017 109846 J J TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MN INC 6,178.56 BEER ORDER 155403 2668753 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 5,463.30 BEER ORDER 155557 2668790 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 11,641.86 139739 5/5/2017 100033 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 312.04 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155404 5703896 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 202.69 WINE ORDER 155405 5703897 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 21.99 B&J STRAWBERRY DAIQUIRI 155406 5706735 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,406.76 WINE ORDER 155407 5706734 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 36 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 187.52 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155408 5706733 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,944.85 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155409 5706732 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 24.60 KINKY COCKTAILS PINK 15541D 5706731 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 81.37 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155411 5706730 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 347.58 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155412 5706829 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 923.03 WINE ORDER 155413 5706728 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 24.60 KINKY COCKTAILS PINK&BLUE 155414 5706727 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,179.14 BLACK BOX WINE ORDER 155415 5706726 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 144.27 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155416 5706725 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 24.67- CUERVO TEQ SILVER CREDIT 155551 623406 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 404.65 WINE ORDER 155558 5712776 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 458.29 NEWAMSTERDAM VODKA ORDER 155559 5712775 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 302.54 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155560 5712774 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 2,406.50 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155561 5712773 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 588.31 WINE ORDER 155562 5712772 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 35.46 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155563 5712771 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 108.22 WINE ORDER 155564 5712770 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 .06 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155565 5712661 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 234.90 E&J BRANDY ORDER 155566 5712395 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 292.48 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155567 5712394 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 9.06 GALLO FV WINE ORDER 155568 5712284 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 4,290.17 CHATEAU SOUVERAIN WINE 155569 5712396 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 18,906.41 139743 5/5/2017 100527 METRO ALARM CONTRACTORS INC 272.53 ALARM MONITORING DT LIQ STORE 155445 029420 6110 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXI86100 02 336.66 ALARM MONITORING PK LIQ STORE 155446 029421 6115 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 609.19 139751 5/5/2017 100290 PAUSTIS&SONS WINE COMPANY 961.01 WINE ORDER 155384 8587677-IN 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 821.26 WINE ORDER 155417 8587676-IN 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,782.27 139752 515/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL 28.34 BATHROOM CLEANER&TRASH BAGS 155494 K76528 6110 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXI06100 02 14.99 BATHROOM CLEANER&TRASH BAGS 155494 K76528 6115 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 43.33 139753 5/5/2017 100032 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 134.40 POP ORDER 155418 95776858 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 134.40 139754 5/5/2017 100034 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC 104.71 UV VODKAAPPLE ORDER 155419 2153080 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 37 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 44.01 DAILY'S STRAWBERRY DAIQUIRI 155420 2154921 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 277.04 WINE ORDER 155421 2154920 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 687.71 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155422 2154919 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,518.22 WINE ORDER 155570 2158463 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 191.59 WINE ORDER 155571 2158653 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,015.45 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155572 2158652 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 3,838.73 139759 5/5/2017 100357 RIVERTOWN NEWSPAPER GROUP 127.50 LIQUOR STORE ST PATS DAY AD 155430 DI22010483 6110 6492 ADVERTISING DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXI86100 02 7.50 LIQUOR STORE AD 155431 D122010581 6110 6492 ADVERTISING DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXI86100 02 7.50 LIQUOR STORE AD 155431 D122010581 6115 6492 ADVERTISING PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 127.50 LIQUOR STORE ST PATS DAY AD 155430 DI22010483 6115 6492 ADVERTISING PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 270.00 139763 5/5/2017 107018 SHAMROCK GROUP 78.80 ICE CUBES 155004 2103474 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 78.80 139766 5/5/2017 112051 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 6,373.51 LIQ,SPIRITS ORDER 155424 1534726 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,892.91 LIQ&WINE ORDER 155574 1537621 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 8,266.42 139770 5/5/2017 113308 TKO WINE 103.20 WINE ORDER 155425 5647 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 103.20 139772 51512017 108808 VINOCOP1A 354.41 WINE ORDER 155426 0178369-IN 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,140.16 WINE ORDER 155427 0178911-IN 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 1,494.57 139773 5/5/2017 100334 WINE MERCHANTS 393.06 WINE ORDER 155428 7129531 6100 1405 15 INVENTORY-PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 97.51 WINE ORDER 155575 7130527 6100 1405 10 INVENTORY-DOWNTOWN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 06100 02 490.57 20170403 4/21/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 887.63 DT LIQ STORE ELEC MAR'17 154903 51-4874008-3 6110 6422 ELECTRIC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EXI86100 02 MAR'17 887.63 20170404 4/4/2017 100085 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 1,057.47 PK LIQ STORE ELEC FEB'17 154388 375989-1 FEB'17 6115 6422 ELECTRIC PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 1,057.47 • R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 38 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 20170407 4/18/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 265.86 DT LIQ STORE GAS MAR'17 154904 0503154879 MAR'17 6110 6423 NATURAL GAS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EX106100 02 265.86 20170408 4/19/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 161.63 PK LIQ STORE GAS MAR'17 154923 0507026961 MAR'17 6115 6423 NATURAL GAS PILOT KNOB LIQUOR 06100 02 161.63 20170415 4/28/2017 114655 EQUITY TRANSWESTERN,LLC 11,352.92 DT LIQUOR STORE RENT 155258 05012017 6110 6556 BUILDING RENTAL DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV&EX106100 02 11,352.92 06100 LIQUOR OPERATIONS 382,223.72 139430 417/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 21.92 UNIFORMS 154734 754699795 6202 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 21.91 UNIFORMS 154736 754702435 6202 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 21,91 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154771 754707726 6202 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 22.21 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154772 754705051 6202 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 87,95 139462 417/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL 13.98 LIMEAWAY CLEANER 154721 K06957 6202 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 22.98 EXTENSION CORD/HEX KEY SET 154723 K06797 6202 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 .76 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 6202 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 73.30 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 6202 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 1.79 CAULK FOR MECH ROOM 154744 K06976 6202 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 1.00 BUIDLING REPAIR 1/2"GALV 154745 K06876 6202 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 2.68 BUIDLING REPAIR 154746 K06861 6202 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 .02- ICE REPAIR RETURN 154764 K07295 CR 6202 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 .72 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 154765 K07291 6202 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 11.77 BUSHING&GALV NIPPLE 154769 K07189 6202 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 128.96 139469 4/7/2017 110651 ROCK MILLS ENTERPRISES,INC 91.50 CAMERA FOR M.H.LIFTER 154790 12758 6202 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 91.50 139474 4/7/2017 112307 1-MOBILE 6.67 GPS SERVICE MAR'17 154783 6517577560 MAR'17 6202 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 6.67 139492 4/14/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 21.91 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154829 754710339 6202 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 21.91 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 39 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139495 4/14/2017 113299 CUES 119.93 SHIPPING TRANSPORTER 154916 478465 6202 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 119.93 139498 4/14/2017 109892 DAKOTA FIRE CONTROL INC 82.04 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 6202 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 82.04 139499 4/14/2017 100241 DELEGARD TOOL CO 77.44 TORQUE WRENCH 154922 166614 6202 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 77.44 139501 4/14/2017 115550 ELIANNA PROPERTIES,LLC 123.79 REF UTIL CR @18330 EVERTON CT 154935 18330 EVERTON CT 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 123.79 139502 4/14/2017 115221 ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICE LLC 197.59 REF UTIL CR @18412 EVEREST CIR 154933 18412 EVEREST CIR 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 197.59 139506 4/14/2017 110520 HOME TITLE,INC 118.80 REF UTIL CR@1301 WALNUT ST 154932 1301 WALNUT STREE3200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 118.80 139507 4/14/2017 112416 IMPACT MAILING OF MN INC - 250.94 MAR'17 UB BILLS 154888 122914 6202 6445 POSTAGE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 69.33 MAR'17 UB BILLS 154888 122914 6202 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 320.27 139515 4/14/2017 100063 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT,INC 207.93 BODY WASH OUT NOZZLE 154400 P04516 6202 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 849.38- JETTER PARTS CREDIT 154462 P04931 6202 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 641.45- 139518 4/14/2017 115551 MICKELSON,MATTHEW J 241.23 REF UTIL CR @19675 MEADOWLARK 154936 19675 MEADOWLARK6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 WAY 241.23 139524 4/14/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING .02 PEST CONTROL JAN'17 154944 152126842/28367911 6202 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 .02 139539 4/14/2017 110480 TITLE ONE,INC 88.05 REF UTIL CR @18273 DUNBURY AVE 154934 18273 DUNBURY AVE 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 88.05 139548 4/21/2017 113809 BANKERS TITLE R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 40 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 312.12 REF UTIL CR @ 608 10TH ST 155035 608 10TH ST 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 312.12 139553 4121/2017 110218 BURNET TITLE 99.26 REF UTIL CR @ 1328 WILLOW TRL 155036 1328 WILLOW TRL 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 279.74 REF UTIL CR @ 18070 ECHO DR 155099 18070 ECHO DR 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 379.00 139557 4/21/2017 115554 CLEAR TO CLOSE TITLE 375.63 REF UTIL CR @ 909 LARCH ST 155032 909 LARCH ST 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 375.63 139558 4/21/2017 115555 CLIFFORD,SEAN M 198.36 REF UTIL CR @ 5120 185TH ST W 155031 5120 185TH ST W 6200 131D 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 198.36 139564 4/21/2017 110576 GIBRALTAR TITLE AGENCY LLC 63.18 REF UTIL CR @ 19805 DEERBROOKE 155102 19805 DEERBROOKE6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 PATH 63.18 139568 4/21/2017 115574 HAHN,SARAH A&TIM W 31.00 REF UTIL CR @ 4590 196TH ST W 155103 4590 196TH ST W 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 31.00 139571 4/21/2017 111773 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS,LLC 93.81 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155019 IN1559259 6202 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 93.81 139579 4/21/2017 100155 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO SERVICES 32,305.00 MAR'17 MCES SAC FEES 155123 MAR'17 SAC 6200 2425 MCES SAC(SWR AVAIL CHG) SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 323.05- MAR'17 MCES SAC FEES 155123 MAR'17 SAC 6201 5030 SAC CHARGE RETAINER SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE06200 08 31,981.95 139580 4/21/2017 100095 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVS 111,517.85 APR'17 WASTEWATER MCES FEES 155094 0001065105 APR'17 6202 6565 MCES FEES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 111,517.85 139581 4/2112017 112216 MIDLAND TITLE CO 44.04 REF UTIL CR @ 19022 EMBRY LN 155034 19022 EMBRY LN 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 44.04 139583 4/21/2017 114616 MINNESOTA TITLE,LLC 650.21 REF UTIL CR @ 18090 EMPIRE DR 155033 18090 EMPIRE DR 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 650.21 139590 4/21/2017 115112 NORTH AMERICAN TITLE CO 99.73 REF UTIL CR @ 20900 CAPRI ST 155104 20900 CAPRI STREET6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 41 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obi Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 99.73 — — — 139605 4121/2017 108220 SOUTH METRO RENTAL INC 50.00 DIAMOND ASPHALT BLADE 155064 78452 6202 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 50.00 139609 4/21/2017 113754 TITLE SMART,INC 91.86 REF UTIL CR @20548 CAMDEN PATH 155100 20548 CAMDEN PATH6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 91.86 139610 4/2112017 110545 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 56.04 REF UTIL CR @ 18978 EMBRYAVE 155098 18978 EMBRYAVE 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 159.08 REF UTIL CR @ 19624 ESTES PATH 155101 19624 ESTES PATH 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 215.12 139615 4/28/2017 100036 AMERICAN PAYMENT CENTERS 20.25 APR-JUN'17 FAM FRESH UTIL BOX 155204 15-15195 6202 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 20.25 139627 4/28/2017 107089 CANNON VALLEY PRINTING 891.56 SUMMER 2017 CNRG PRINT SERV 155156 FPR 36052 6202 6450 OUTSIDE PRINTING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 891.56 139632 4/28/2017 110844 DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SRVS 47.86 JAN'17 DIESEL FUEL 155141 00024626 6202 6272 FUEL SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 23.50 MAR'17 DIESEL FUEL 155146 00024969 6202 6272 FUEL SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 71.36 139638 4/28/2017 100419 EMPIRE TOWNSHIP 472.05 209TH ST SEWER JAN-MAR'17 155267 00000057 6202 6560 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 JAN-MAR'17 472.05 139647 4/28/2017 112942 GMS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES,INC 39.50 HD RUBBER GLOVES 155239 029408 6202 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 39.50 139648 4/28/2017 100024 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 136.35 MAR'17 LOCATES 155242 7030363 6202 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 136.35 139650 4/28/2017 115589 HARRIS,JONATHAN W 178.17 REF UTIL CR @ 5115 UP 183RD ST 155303 5115 UPPER 183RD 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 ST W 178.17 139665 4/2812017 100049 LOCAL GVMT INFO SYSTEMS ASSN. 972.25 LOGIS BILL-MAR'17 155278 43321 6202 6402 DATA PROCESSING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 42 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 972.25 — — — 139670 4128/2017 100063 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT,INC 72.47 DEBRIS DOOR HOLDER 155248 P05417 6202 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 72.47 139672 4/28/2017 114625 MASTER MECHANICAL,INC 161.33 CMF HVAC REPAIR 155271 47420D 6202 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 161.33 139675 4/28/2017 100095 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVS 111,517.85 MAY'17 WASTE WATER MCES FEES 155269 0001066252 MAY'17 6202 6565 MCES FEES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 111,517.85 139679 4/28/2017 115582 MN REO COMPANY 116.44 REF UTIL CR @ 5531 EUCLID WAY 155294 5531 EUCLID WAY 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 116.44 139680 4/28/2017 113031 NRG RELIABILITY SOLUTIONS LLC 196.30 CMF ELEC MAR'17 155275 3347-1704 6202 6422 ELECTRIC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 196.30 139681 4/28/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING .02 PEST CONTROLAPR'17 155060 155083360/28367911 6202 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 .02 139695 4/28/2017 115590 SAUTER,ALLEN R&DIANA L 190.93 REF UTIL CR @ 2476 CYPRESS DR 155302 20476 CYPRESS DR 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 190.93 139702 4/28/2017 113754 TITLE SMART,INC 44.04 REF UTIL CR @ 4820 189TH ST W 155296 4820 189TH ST W 6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 44.04 139705 4/28/2017 113413 VERIZON WIRELESS 95.60 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 6202 6412 CELLULAR PHONES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 94.59 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 6202 6412 CELLULAR PHONES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 35.01 MAR'17 DATA CARDS 155255 9782699496 6202 6412 CELLULAR PHONES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 35.01 FEB'17 DATA CARDS 155256 9780898519 6202 6412 CELLULAR PHONES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 260.21 139706 4/28/2017 109514 WIGEN COMPANIES INC 147.76 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 155212 19981 6202 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 147.76 139709 5/5/2017 103774 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION 200.00 APWA MEMBERSHIP 155495 699682 JUL'17- 6202 6402 DATA PROCESSING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 JUN'18 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 43 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017. Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 200.00 139717 5/5/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 20.85 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155441 754720835 6202 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 22.21 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155462 754712974 6202 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 20.85 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155483 754715578 6202 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 21.43 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155493 754718217 6202 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 85.34 139719 5/5/2017 113299 CUES 1,123.34 SEWER CAMERA 155277 479897 6202 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 1,123.34 139752 5/512017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL .44 LUBRICANT 155482 K07685 6202 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 2.07 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 K87683 6202 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 9,98 RUBBER GLOVES 155506 K87687 6202 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 12,49 139761 5/5/2017 107129 ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY 4,290.00 904 3RD ST SEWER REPAIR 155449 04819536087 6202 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 4,290.00 139769 5/5/2017 114031 TITLE SMART,INC 70.32 REF UTIL CR @ 19683 MEADOWLARK 155548 19683 MEADOWLARK6200 1310 3 REFUND CIS SEWER OPERATIONS 06200 08 WAY 70.32 139771 5/512017 112307 T-MOBILE 6.66 GPS MAR-APR'17 155209 823329497 APR'17 6202 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 6.66 20170401 4/3/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 17.54 FAIRGROUNDS LS ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6202 6422 ELECTRIC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 15.24 CITY GARAGE ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6202 6422 ELECTRIC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 48.95- WESTVIEW LS ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6202 6422 ELECTRIC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 72.83- HUNTER LS ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6202 6422 ELECTRIC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 89.00- 20170403 4/21/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 18.04 LINDEN ST LFT STAT ELEC MAR'17 154918 51-6585658-8 6202 6422 ELECTRIC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 MAR'17 18.04 20170404 4/412017 100085 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 105.06 VERM GROVE LS ELEC FEB'17 154366 321577-9 FEB'17 6202 6422 ELECTRIC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 105.06 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 44 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 20170405 4/25/2017 100085 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 19.36 220TH ST LIFT STATION MAR'17 154928 140522-4 MAR'17 6202 6422 ELECTRIC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 19.36 20170406 4/13/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 20.53 VERM GROVE LIFT STA GAS MAR'17 154767 0503080372 MAR'17 6202 6423 NATURAL GAS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 20.53 20170407 4/18/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 118.29 1ST STREET GARAGE GAS MAR'17 154910 0505547424 MAR'17 6202 6423 NATURAL GAS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 D8 707.46 CMF GAS MAR'17 154913 0502362190 MAR'17 6202 6423 NATURAL GAS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 825.75 20170412 4/7/2017 113546 TREASURE ENTERPRISE,INC .11 CMF MAR'17 CLEANING SERVICES 154710 674 6202 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 .11 20170413 4/18/2017 111046 VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 521.39 MAR'17 FUEL SEWER 154892 MAR'17 869088237 6202 6272 FUEL SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 SEWER 4.04 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 6202 6272 FUEL SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE06200 08 BLDG MNT 525.43 06200 SEWER OPERATIONS 269,870.83 139430 4/7/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 43.83 UNIFORMS 154734 754699795 6302 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 43.83 UNIFORMS 154736 754702435 6302 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 43.83 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154771 754707726 6302 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 44.41 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154772 754705051 6302 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 175.90 139432 4/7/2017 103172 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES 534.38 RADIATOR FOR TRUCK#3214 154781 25490 6302 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 534.38 139462 4/7/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL 29.40 SHOP SUPPLIES 154716 K06765 6302 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 .25 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 6302 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 76.11 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 6302 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 2.81 CAULK FOR MECH ROOM 154744 K06976 6302 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 1.58 BUIDLING REPAIR 1/2"GALV 154745 K06876 6302 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 4.21 BUIDLING REPAIR 154746 K06861 6302 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 45 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div .01- ICE REPAIR RETURN 154764 K07295 CR 6302 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 .43 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 154765 K07291 6302 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 114.78 139491 4/14/2017 115546 CART GUY LLC,THE 14,502.50 30 GALLON CARTS,LIDS&WHEELS 154937 1013 6302 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 14,502.50 139492 4/14/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 43.83 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERV1C 154829 754710339 6302 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 43.83 139494 4/14/2017 112111 CRAZY CRAYONS,LLC 175.28 PROMOTIONAL ITEMS-CRAYONS 154276 1007 6302 6570 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 175.28 139498 4/14/2017 109892 DAKOTA FIRE CONTROL INC 82.04 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 82.04 139500 4/14/2017 100057 DICK'S SANITATION INC 983.35 MAR17 RECYCLING SCHOOLS 154878 DT0001748919 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 22,680.16 MAR'17 RECYCLING CITY 154879 DT0001759129 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 4,570.33 MAR'17 RECYCLING COMMERCIAL 154880 DT0001759128 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 28,233.84 139507 4/14/2017 112416 IMPACT MAILING OF MN INC 250.94 MAR'17 UB BILLS 154888 122914 6302 6445 POSTAGE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 69.33 MAR'17 UB BILLS 154888 122914 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 320.27 139524 4/14/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 93.80 PEST CONTROL JAN'17 154944 152126842/28367911 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 93.80 139556 4/21/2017 113887 CLEANLITES RECYLING,INC MN 160.81 ELECTRONICS RECYCLING MAR'17 155052 IN0001994 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 160.81 139571 4/21/2017 111773 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS,LLC 97.40 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155019 IN1559259 6302 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 97.40 139615 4/28/2017 100036 AMERICAN PAYMENT CENTERS 20.25 APR-JUN'17 FAM FRESH UTIL BOX 155204 15-15195 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 20.25 139622 4/28/2017 114075 BLACKFIRE CREATIVE DESIGNS R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 46 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 39.50 CITY OF FARMINGTON DOOR DECALS 155250 2052 6302 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 39.50 139627 4128/2017 107089 CANNON VALLEY PRINTING 891.56 SUMMER 2017 CNRG PRINT SERV 155156 FPR 36052 6302 6450 OUTSIDE PRINTING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 891.56 139628 4/28/2017 100058 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 403.99 HYDRAULIC HOSE 155216 2131-434854 6302 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 40.02 COOLANT FILTER 3213 155220 2131-435279 6302 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 13.79 DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID 155229 2131-434751 6302 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 25.04 HYDRAULIC HOSE FITTING 155230 2131-434913 6302 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 28.03 DRL LIGHT SOCKET 155232 2131-435150 6302 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 510.87 139632 4/28/2017 110844 DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SRVS 2,759.03 JAN'17 DIESEL FUEL 155141 00024626 6302 6272 FUEL SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 3,018.05 FEB'17 DIESEL FUEL 155145 00024627 6302 6272 FUEL SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 3,414.65 MAR'17 DIESEL FUEL 155146 00024969 6302 6272 FUEL SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 9,191.73 139665 4/28/2017 100049 LOCAL GVMT INFO SYSTEMS ASSN. 832.25 LOGIS BILL-MAR'17 155278 43321 6302 6402 DATA PROCESSING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 832.25 139666 4/28/2017 112658 LOCATION TECHNOLOGIES,INC 43.25 GPS SERVICE APR'17 155245 15039 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 43.25 139672 4/28/2017 114625 MASTER MECHANICAL,INC 96.80 CMF HVAC REPAIR 155271 47420D 6302 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 96.80 139680 4/28/2017 113031 NRG RELIABILITY SOLUTIONS LLC 170.33 CMF ELEC MAR'17 155275 3347-1704 6302 6422 ELECTRIC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 170.33 139681 4128/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 87.77 PEST CONTROLAPR'17 155060 155083360/28367911 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 87.77 139689 4/28/2017 114582 RAMSEY-WASHINGTON RECYCLING&ENERGY 43,208.60 TIPPING FEES 155140 RESFA-001154 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 MAR'17 43,208.60 139705 4/28/2017 113413 VERIZON WIRELESS 119.46 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 6302 6412 CELLULAR PHONES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection, Council Check Summary Page- 47 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 119.34 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 6302 6412 CELLULAR PHONES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 238.80 139706 4/28/2017 109514 WIGEN COMPANIES INC 88.61 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 155212 19981 6302 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 . 88.61 139709 515/2017 103774 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION 200.00 APWA MEMBERSHIP 155495 699682 JUL'17- 6302 6460 SUBSCRIPTIONS&DUES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 D8 JUN'18 200.00 139717 5/5/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 41.69 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155441 754720835 6302 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 44.41 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155462 754712974 6302 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 D8 41.69 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155483 754715578 6302 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 42.87 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155493 754718217 6302 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 170.66 139721 5/5/2017 100057 DICK'S SANITATION INC 22,731.15 APR'17 RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING 155576 DT0001787038 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 983.35 APR'17 RECYCLING SCHOOLS 155577 DT0001776659 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 4,754.44 APR'17 RECYCLING COMMERCIAL 155578 DT0001787037 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 28,468.94 139752 5/5/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL .69 LUBRICANT 155482 K07685 6302 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 2.15 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 K87683 6302 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 2.84 139764 5/5/2017 100068 SKB ENVIRONMENTAL INC 85.67 TIPPING FEES 4/5/17 155487 R 36044 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 85.67 139765 5/5/2017 113195 SKYVIEW RANCH LLC 375.00 PETTING ZOO EARTH&ARBOR DAY 155532 2646 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 375.00 139767 5/5/2017 100379 SPRINT-NEXTEL 26.37 SOLID WASTE TRACKER 155497 875483313 APR'17 6302 6412 CELLULAR PHONES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 26.37 20170401 4/3/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 12.66 CITY GARAGE ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6302 6422 ELECTRIC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 12.66 20170407 4/18/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 103.99 1ST STREET GARAGE GAS MAR'17 154910 0505547424 MAR'17 6302 6423 NATURAL GAS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 48 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 664.71 CMF GAS MAR'17 154913 0502362190 MAR'17 6302 6423 NATURAL GAS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 768.70 20170412 4/7/2017 113546 TREASURE ENTERPRISE,INC 577.36 CMF MAR'17 CLEANING SERVICES 154710 674 6302 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 577.36 20170413 4118/2017 111046 VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 81.46 MAR'17 FUEL SOLID WASTE 154891 MAR'17 869088237 6302 6272 FUEL SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 SLD WST 1.35 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 6302 6272 FUEL SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 06300 08 BLDG MNT 82.81 06300 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS 130,726.16 139430 4/7/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 21.91 UNIFORMS 154734 754699795 6402 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 21.91 UNIFORMS 154736 754702435 6402 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 21.91 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154771 754707726 6402 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 22.21 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154772 754705051 6402 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 87.94 139462 4/7/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL .17 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 6402 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 20.94 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 6402 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 .79 CAULK FOR MECH ROOM 154744 K06976 6402 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 .44 BUIDLING REPAIR 1/2"GALV 154745 K06876 6402 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 1.18 BUIDLING REPAIR 154746 K06861 6402 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 .17 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 154765 K07291 6402 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 23.69 139469 4/7/2017 110651 ROCK MILLS ENTERPRISES,INC 91.50 CAMERA FOR M.H.LIFTER 154790 12758 6402 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 91.50 139474 4/7/2017 112307 T-MOBILE 6.66 GPS SERVICE MAR'17 154783 6517577560 MAR'17 6402 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 6.66 139492 4/14/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 21.91 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154829 754710339 6402 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 21.91 139494 4/14/2017 112111 CRAZY CRAYONS,LLC 164.00 PROMOTIONAL ITEMS-CRAYONS 154276 1007 6402 6570 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 49 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 164.00 139498 4/14/2017 109892 DAKOTA FIRE CONTROL INC 16.40 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 6402 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 16.40 139507 4/14/2017 112416 IMPACT MAILING OF MN INC 250.94 MAR'17 UB BILLS 154888 122914 6402 6445 POSTAGE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 69.33 MAR'17 UB BILLS 154888 122914 6402 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 320.27 139515 4/14/2017 100063 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT,INC 38.45 SWEEPER PARTS 154899 P05007 6402 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 1,219.17 SWEEPER PARTS 154901 P05016 6402 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 1,257.62 139524 4/14/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 10.77 PEST CONTROL JAN'17 154944 152126842/28367911 6402 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 10.77 139571 4/21/2017 111773 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS,LLC 26.80 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155019 IN1559259 6402 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 26.80 139578 4/21/2017 100063 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT,INC 77.06 SWEEPER PARTS 155012 P05154 6402 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 77.06 139605 4/21/2017 108220 SOUTH METRO RENTAL INC 50.00 DIAMOND ASPHALT BLADE 155064 78452 6402 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 50.00 139615 4/28/2017 100036 AMERICAN PAYMENT CENTERS 20.25 APR-JUN'17 FAM FRESH UTIL BOX 155204 15-15195 6402 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 20.25 139627 4/28/2017 107089 CANNON VALLEY PRINTING 891.56 SUMMER 2017 CNRG PRINT SERV 155156 FPR 36052 6402 6450 OUTSIDE PRINTING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 891.56 139628 4/28/2017 100058 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 9.00 RETURN HOSE 155226 2131-437048 6402 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 6.64 GREASE FITTINGS FOR SWEEPER 155236 2131-436728 6402 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 15.64 139632 4/28/2017 110844 DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SRVS 89.84 MAR'17 DIESEL FUEL 155146 00024969 6402 6272 FUEL STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 89.84 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 50 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139665 4/2812017 100049 LOCAL GVMT INFO SYSTEMS ASSN. 832,25 LOGIS BILL-MAR'17 155278 43321 6402 6402 DATA PROCESSING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 832.25 139670 4/28/2017 100063 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT,INC 72.47 DEBRIS DOOR HOLDER 155248 P05417 6402 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 72.47 139672 4128/2017 114625 MASTER MECHANICAL,INC 38.72 CMF HVAC REPAIR 155271 47420D 6402 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 38.72 139680 4/28/2017 113031 NRG RELIABILITY SOLUTIONS LLC 41.49 CMF ELEC MAR'17 155275 3347-1704 6402 6422 ELECTRIC STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 41.49 139681 4/28/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 10.77 PEST CONTROLAPR'17 155060 155083360/28367911 6402 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 10.77 139700 4/28/2017 105966 STARK,RICKIE 1,920.00 BARLEY STRAW BALES 155288 067606 6402 6570 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 1,920.00 139706 4/28/2017 109514 WIGEN COMPANIES INC 35.46 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 155212 19981 6402 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 35.46 139709 5/5/2017 103774 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION 200.00 APWA MEMBERSHIP 155495 699682 JUL'17- 6402 6460 SUBSCRIPTIONS&DUES STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 JUN'18 200.00 139717 5/5/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 20.85 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155441 754720835 6402 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 22.21 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155462 754712974 6402 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 20.85 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155483 754715578 6402 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 21.43 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155493 754718217 6402 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 85.34 139719 5/5/2017 113299 CUES 1,123.34 SEWER CAMERA 155277 479897 6402 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 1,123.34 139752 515/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL .19 LUBRICANT 155482 K07685 6402 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 .59 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 K87683 6402 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 .78 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 51 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139771 5/512017 112307 T-MOBILE 6.67 GPS MAR-APR'17 155209 823329497 APR'17 6402 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 6.67 20170401 413/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 11.75 HICKORY ST LS ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6402 6422 ELECTRIC STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 3.39 CITY GARAGE ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6402 6422 ELECTRIC STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 15.14 20170407 4/18/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 27.30 1ST STREET GARAGE GAS MAR'17 154910 0505547424 MAR'17 6402 6423 NATURAL GAS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 163.26 CMF GAS MAR'17 154913 0502362190 MAR'17 6402 6423 NATURAL GAS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 190.56 20170412 4/7/2017 113546 TREASURE ENTERPRISE,INC 70.84 CMF MAR'17 CLEANING SERVICES 154710 674 6402 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 70.84 20170413 4/18/2017 111046 VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 148.23 MAR'17 FUEL STORM 154893 MAR'17 869088237 6402 6272 FUEL STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 STORM .90 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 6402 6272 FUEL STORM WATER UTILITY OPERA 06400 08 BLDG MNT 149.13 06400 STORM WATER UTILITY 7,964.87 139422 4/7/2017 100192 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES-MWR,INC 90.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 20369 EAVES 154791 706889310 6502 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 90.49 139430 4/7/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 21.91 UNIFORMS 154734 754699795 6502 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 21.91 UNIFORMS 154736 754702435 6502 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 21.91 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154771 754707726 6502 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 22.21 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154772 754705051 6502 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 87.94 139444 4/7/2017 100007 HAWKINS INC 282.29 CHLORINE TUBING 154722 4039488 RI 6502 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 282.29 139455 4/7/2017 115508 MIDWEST LEAK DETECTION 370.00 WATER LEAK 20369 EAVES WAY 154796 1089 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 370.00 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 52 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139460 417/2017 100070 MVTL.MINN VALLEY TESTING LABS 37.50 COLIFORM COLILERT BAC-T SAMPLE 154724 854129 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 37.50 139462 4/7/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL 6.99 CAULK 154725 K07042 6502 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 9.25 WRENCH LINK 154731 K06950 6502 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 73.30 PAPER PRODUCTS 154732 58648 6502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 1.73 CAULK FOR MECH ROOM 154744 K06976 6502 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 .97 BUIDLING REPAIR 1/2"GALV 154745 K06876 6502 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 2.60 BUIDLING REPAIR 154746 K06861 6502 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 .11- ICE REPAIR RETURN 154764 K07295 CR 6502 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 4.44 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 154765 K07291 6502 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 99.17 139469 4/7/2017 110651 ROCK MILLS ENTERPRISES,INC 91.50 CAMERA FOR M.H.LIFTER 154790 12758 6502 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 91.50 139474 4/7/2017 112307 T-MOBILE 6.66 GPS SERVICE MAR'17 154783 6517577560 MAR'17 6502 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 6.66 139492 4/14/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 21.91 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING SERVIC 154829 754710339 6502 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 21.91 139498 4/14/2017 109892 DAKOTA FIRE CONTROL INC 82.04 ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPECT&REPAIR 154908 17029 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 D8 82.04 139507 4/14/2017 112416 IMPACT MAILING OF MN INC 250.94 MAR'17 UB BILLS 154888 122914 6502 6445 POSTAGE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 69.32 MAR'17 UB BILLS 154888 122914 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 320.26 139521 4/14/2017 100030 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT 327.60 HYDRANT PARTS 154900 0374090 6502 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 327.60 139523 4/14/2017 100070 MVTL-MINN VALLEY TESTING LABS 43.75 COLIFORM COLILERT BAC-T SAMPLE 154917 855252 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 43.75 139524 4/14/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 102.43 JAN'17 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 154881 152126318/28454299 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 53 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No EU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 17.23 PEST CONTROL JAN'17 154944 152126842/28367911 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 119.66 139571 4/21/2017 111773 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS,LLC 93.81 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155019 IN1559259 6502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 93.81 139582 4/21/2017 100169 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 23.00 GLENN WATER LICENSE RENEWAL 155029 GLENN WATER 6502 6460 SUBSCRIPTIONS&DUES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 LICENSE 23.00 NICK WATER LICENSE RENEWAL 155030 NICK WATER LICENSB502 6460 SUBSCRIPTIONS&DUES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 46.00 139605 4/21/2017 108220 SOUTH METRO RENTAL INC 50.00 DIAMOND ASPHALT BLADE 155064 78452 6502 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 50.00 139615 4/28/2017 100036 AMERICAN PAYMENT CENTERS 20.25 APR-JUN'17 FAM FRESH UTIL BOX 155204 15-15195 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 20.25 139618 4/28/2017 112190 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY 1,721.50 WHPP AMENDMENT PART 2 155147 23191278.01-6 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 1,721.50 139627 4/28/2017 107089 CANNON VALLEY PRINTING 891.56 SUMMER 2017 CNRG PRINT SERV 155156 FPR 36052 6502 6450 OUTSIDE PRINTING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 891.56 139632 4/28/2017 110844 DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SRVS 77.70 JAN'17 DIESEL FUEL 155141 00024626 6502 6272 FUEL WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 77.70 139648 4/28/2017 100024 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 136.35 MAR'17 LOCATES 155242 7030363 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 136.35 139665 4128/2017 100049 LOCAL GVMT INFO SYSTEMS ASSN. 832.25 LOGIS BILL-MAR'17 155278 43321 6502 6402 DATA PROCESSING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 832.25 139672 4128/2017 114625 MASTER MECHANICAL,INC 1,000.26 CMF HVAC REPAIR 155271 47420D 6502 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 1,000.26 139674 4/28/2017 113442 METERING&TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS 11.97 METER HORN GASKETS 155268 8676 6502 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 11.97 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 54 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139677 4/2812017 100030 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT 47.04 BLUE MARKING FLAGS 155241 0374447 6502 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 47.04 139680 4/28/2017 113031 NRG RELIABILITY SOLUTIONS LLC 1,720.18 CMF ELEC MAR'17 155275 3347-1704 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 1,720.18 139681 4128/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 17.23 PEST CONTROLAPR'17 155060 155083360/28367911 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 17.23 139705 4/28/2017 113413 VERIZON WIRELESS 95.60 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 6502 6412 CELLULAR PHONES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 94.59 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 6502 6412 CELLULAR PHONES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 35.01 MAR'17 DATA CARDS 155255 9782699496 6502 6412 CELLULAR PHONES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 35.01 FEB'17 DATA CARDS 155256 9780898519 6502 6412 CELLULAR PHONES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 260,21 139706 4/28/2017 109514 WIGEN COMPANIES INC 916,02 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 155212 19981 6502 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 916.02 139709 5/5/2017 103774 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION 200.00 APWA MEMBERSHIP 155495 699682 JUL'17- 6502 6460 SUBSCRIPTIONS&DUES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 JUN'18 200.00 139717 5/5/2017 100025 CINTAS CORP LOC 754 20.85 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155441 754720835 6502 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 22.21 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155462 754712974 6502 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 20.85 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155483 754715578 6502 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 21.43 WEEKLY UNIFORM CLEANING APR'17 155493 754718217 6502 6290 UNIFORMS&CLOTHING WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 85.34 139731 5/5/2017 100007 HAWKINS INC 18,538.48 WELL CHEMICAL ORDER 155466 4054291 RI 6502 6260 CHEMICALS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 18,538.48 , 139750 5/5/2017 100070 MVTL-MINN VALLEY TESTING LABS 48.75 COLIFORM COLILERT BAC-T SAMPLE 155477 858333 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 48.75 139752 5/5/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL .43 LUBRICANT 155482 K07685 6502 6515 BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 41.97 HEXKEY SET/CONCRETE MIX 155485 K07723 6502 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 2.07 PAINTING SUPPLIES 155499 K87683 6502 6240 BUILDING SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 55 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 44.47 139771 515/2017 112307 T-MOBILE 6.66 GPS MAR-APR'17 155209 823329497 APR'17 6502 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 6.66 20170401 4/312017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 78.03 WELL#1 ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 392.97 WELL#3 ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 125.30 CITY GARAGE ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 596.30 20170404 4/4/2017 100085 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 22.40 DAISY KNOLL TOWER ELEC FEB'17 154362 131851-8 FEB'17 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 907.66 WELL#4 ELEC FEB'17 154363 131852-6 FEB'17 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 63.68 195TH WATER TOWER ELEC FEB'17 154364 258709-5 FEB'17 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 1,868.43 WELL#5 ELEC FEB'17 154365 278553-3 FEB'17 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 1,186.71 WELL#7 ELEC FEB'17 154367 349073-7 FEB'17 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 2,807.07 WELL#8 ELEC FEB'17 154368 419970-9 FEB'17 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 2,343.44 WELL#6 ELEC FEB'17 154369 155015-1 FEB'17 6502 6422 ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 9,199.39 20170406 4/13/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 90.16 WELL#5 GAS MAR'17 154766 0507120636 MAR'17 6502 6423 NATURAL GAS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 90.16 20170407 4/18/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 151.65 1ST STREET GARAGE GAS MAR'17 154910 0505547424 MAR'17 6502 6423 NATURAL GAS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 48.56 WELL HOUSE 1 OAK ST GAS MAR'17 154912 0506788875 MAR'17 6502 6423 NATURAL GAS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 907.01 CMF GAS MAR'17 154913 0502362190 MAR'17 6502 6423 NATURAL GAS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 1,107.22 20170412 4/7/2017 113546 TREASURE ENTERPRISE,INC 68.34 CMF MAR'17 CLEANING SERVICES 154710 674 6502 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 68.34 20170413 4/18/2017 111046 VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 305.51 MAR'17 FUEL WATER 154895 MAR'17 869088237 6502 6272 FUEL WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 WATER 49.41 MAR'17 FUEL BLDG MAINT 154940 MAR'17 869088237 6502 6272 FUEL WATER UTILITY EXPENSE 06500 08 BLDG MNT 354.92 06500 WATER UTILITY 40,163.13 139585 4/21/2017 100575 MN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 56 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 79,477.60 TH3 SIGNAL UPGRADES SP 1902.41 155027 00000402492 6600 2010 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE MANUAL STREETLIGHT UTILITY 06600 08 .01 TH3 SIGNAL UPGRADES SP 1902.41 155027 00000402492 6602 6401 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 79,477.61 139632 4/28/2017 110844 DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SRVS 134.87 JAN-MAR'17 UTILITIES 155144 00024943 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 134.87 139649 4/2812017 103373 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 3,564.12 STREET LIGHT POLES&BOLTS 155289 990699557 6602 6220 EQUIP SUPPLIES&PARTS STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 3,564.12 20170401 4/312017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 11.75 DOWNTOWN ST LTS ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 23.03 DOWNTOWN ST LTS ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 11.75 DOWNTOWN ST LTS ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 53.74 TRAFFIC SIGNAL ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB.17 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 179.27 ROUND ABOUT ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 8,005.90 NON-METER ST LTS ELEC FEB'17 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 8,285.44 20170403 4/21/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY 15.51 5262 208TH ST LTS ELEC MAR'17 154919 51-6391412-3 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 MAR'17 161.48 321 ELM ST LTS ELEC MAR'17 154920 51-8608862-8 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 MAR'17 167.27 190TH ST BRDG LTS ELEC MAR'17 154921 51-9371130-1 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 MAR'17 344.26 20170404 41412017 100085 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 6,519.79 9TH ST STREET LTS ELEC FEB'17 154361 103842-1 FEB'17 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 6,519.79 20170405 412512017 100085 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 18.43 SPRUCE ST MONUMENT LTS MAR'17 154929 409912-3 MAR'17 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 258.51 DENMRK/SPRUCE ST LTS MAR'17 154930 422247-7 MAR'17 6602 6422 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHT UTILITY EXPEN 06600 08 276.94 06600 STREETLIGHT UTILITY 98,603.03 139513 4114/2017 100164 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES 563.50 154948 041317906514 7000 2116 LELS DUES PAYABLE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 563.50 139519 4/14/2017 100162 MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOCIATION R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 57 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No EU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 70.84 154947 041317906513 7000 2120 MBA PAYABLE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 70.84 139531 4/14/2017 100135 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RE71REMENTASSN. 19,430.83 154945 041317906511 7000 2113 PERA PAYABLE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 25,763.67 154946 041317906512 7000 6154 PERA EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 45,194.50 139567 4/2112017 115462 GROUP HEALTH INC.-WORKSITE 139.00 MAR'17 EAP PROGRAM 155053 W813630 7000 6158 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 139.00 139576 4/21/2017 115466 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 361.80 CI&ACCIDENT INSURANCEAPR'17 155086 A1960331 APRIL'17 7000 6158 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 361.80 139660 4/28/2017 100164 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES 563.50 155311 042717951063 7000 2116 LELS DUES PAYABLE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 563.50 139663 4/28/2017 115466 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 361.80 CI&ACCIDENT INS-MAY'17 155286 A1960331 MAY'17 7000 6158 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 361.80 139678 4/28/2017 100322 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 16.00 155312 042717951064 7000 2119 PERA LIFE INS PAYABLE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 16.00 139688 4128/2017 100135 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSN. 19,481.15 155309 042717951061 7000 2113 PERA PAYABLE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 25,835.21 155310 042717951062 7000 6154 PERA EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 45,316.36 139768 5/5/2017 114206 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 985.74 LTD INSURANCE MAY'17 155435 237780 MAY'17 7000 6158 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 3,002.60 LIFE INSURANCE MAY'17 155436 237780 MAY'17 7000 6158 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 3,988.34 20170411 4/4/2017 115438 AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP 5,891.32 APRIL 2017 DENTAL BILL 154712 010-44446 APR'17 7000 6158 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 5,891.32 20170416 4/28/2017 115445 HEALTH PARTNERS 51,724.00 HEALTH INSURANCE MAY'17 155592 72311369 MAY'17 7000 6158 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 07000 02 51,724.00 07000 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND 154,190.96 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 58 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139575 412112017 100354 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST 1,000.00 INS DEDUCT C0027408 SHERNO 155081 2117/CLAIM 7100 6430 INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE 07100 02 #C0027408 1,000.00 139661 4/28/2017 115568 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 92,007.00 1ST&2ND QTR MUNI INS 155290 10003113 2017-1 7100 6426 INSURANCE INSURANCE 07100 02 5,718.00 LIQUOR STORES LIAB 155290 10003113 2017-1 7100 6426 INSURANCE INSURANCE 07100 02 47,204.00 EXCESS LIAB PREM 155290 10003113 2017-1 7100 6426 INSURANCE INSURANCE 07100 02 144,929.00 139662 4/28/2017 100354 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST 2,685.23 INS DEDUCT ALIX KENDALL 155292 2253/CLAIM# 7100 6430 INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE 07100 02 C0028833 1,000.00 INS DEDUCT LAUREEN BARGHANI 155293 2180/CLAIM# 7100 6430 INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE 07100 02 C0026776 3,685.23 139741 5/5/2017 100354 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST 1,239.26 INSUR DEDUCT FARM GREENHOUSE 155489 2449 7100 6430 INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE 07100 02 1,239.26 07100 INSURANCE 150,853.49 139440 4/7/2017 112942 GMS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES,INC 31.23 HEAD CAP SCREWS 154800 028736A 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 31,23 139441 4/7/2017 102071 GOODYEAR TIRE&RUBBER COMPANY,THE 261.95 TIRE MOUNTING 154798 124-1083914 7200 6232 VEHICLE TIRES FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 579.16 TIRES 154799 124-1083909 7200 6232 VEHICLE TIRES FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 841.11 139560 4/21/2017 100241 DELEGARD TOOL CO 69.91 WORK GLOVES AND LIGHTS 155017 167511 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 69.91 139562 4121/2017 109931 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO 11.00- BATTERY CORE CREDIT 154748 1-Z10332 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 11.00- 139565 4/21/2017 112942 GMS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES,INC 20.44 RUBBER WORK GLOVES 155016 029203 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 20.44 139622 4128/2017 114075 BLACKFIRE CREATIVE DESIGNS 39.50 CITY OF FARMINGTON DOOR DECALS 155250 2052 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 59 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 39.50 139628 412812017 100058 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 11.76 OIL FILTERS 155219 2131-435170 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 79.19- BLOWER MOTOR RETURN 155222 2131-435912 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 157.99 AIR FILTER 155223 2131-435962 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 48.81 STOCK FILTERS 155232 2131-435150 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 52.50 STOCK FILTERS 155234 2131-435584 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 18.06 STOCK FILTERS 155238 2131-437420 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 79.19 BLOWER MOTOR 155246 2131-435909 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 289.12 139635 412812017 100241 DELEGARD TOOL CO 190.56 WHEEL REMOVAL TOOL 155266 169029 7200 6250 OTHER SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 190.56 139647 4128/2017 112942 GMS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES,INC 33.40 GREASE GUN FITTING 155239 029408 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 33.40 139705 4/2812017 113413 VERIZON WIRELESS 39.82 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 7200 6412 CELLULAR PHONES FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 D8 39.78 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 7200 6412 CELLULAR PHONES FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 79.60 139729 515/2017 110875 GCR TIRES&SERVICE 370.16 LAWN MOWER TIRES 155468 521-37661 7200 6232 VEHICLE TIRES FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 370.16 139760 5/5/2017 103092 ROCKMOUNT RESEARCH AND ALLOYS INC 703.29 WELDING SUPPLIES&DRILL BITS 155486 1225775 7200 6230 VEHICLE SUPPLIES&PARTS FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 703.29 20170413 4/1812017 111046 VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 67.87 MAR'17 FUEL FLEET 155008 MAR'17 869088237 7200 6272 FUEL FLEET OPERATIONS 07200 08 FLEET 67.87 07200 FLEET OPERATIONS 2,725.19 139429 4/712017 110511 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 436.56 ALARM LINES MAR-APR'17 154713 0001792 APR'17 7400 6411 TELEPHONE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 436.56 139530 4114/2017 110760 PRO-TECH DESIGN SECURITY SOLUTIONS 9,592.00 CAMERAADDITION FOR CMF 154898 79652 7400 6960 FURNITURE&OFFICE E INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 60 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 110.00 CITY HALL PANIC BUTTON WORK 154939 79576 7400 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 D4 9,702.00 139561 4/21/2017 105755 ES RI 3,700.00 YEARLY MAINTENANCE FOR ARCGIS 155026 93269039 7400 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 3,700.00 139598 4/21/2017 110760 PRO-TECH DESIGN SECURITY SOLUTIONS 110.00- PANIC BUTTON CREDIT 155038 79576 CR 7400 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 176.00 CARD ACCESS DOOR REPAIR 155040 79573 7400 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 66.00 139630 4/28/2017 110591 CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS 1,998.56 PHONE LINES-MAR'17 155265 738246 MAR'17 7400 6411 TELEPHONE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 1,998.56 139655 4128/2017 109768 IMAGE TREND,INC 300.00 FIRE SOFTWARE HOSTING-APR'17 155243 105877 7400 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 300.00 139665 4/28/2017 100049 LOCAL GVMT INFO SYSTEMS ASSN. 1,121.25 PCI COMPLIANCE 155274 43380 7400 6402 00001 DATA PROCESSING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 287.50 NETWORK SUPPORT 155274 43380 7400 6402 00001 DATA PROCESSING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 3,559.00 LOGIS BILL-MAR'17 155278 43321 7400 6402 DATA PROCESSING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 361.58 FEB'17 INTERNET-WAN 155305 43438 7400 6402 DATA PROCESSING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 5,329.33 139691 4/28/2017 112632 RICOH USA,INC 275.87 COPIER MAINTENANCE MAR-APR'17 155260 5048158872 7400 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 275.87 139705 4128/2017 113413 VERIZON WIRELESS 50.71 MAR'17 CELL PHONES 155253 9783022627 7400 6412 CELLULAR PHONES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 50.66 FEB'17 CELL PHONES 155254 9781210799 7400 6412 CELLULAR PHONES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 101.37 139720 5/5/2017 110844 DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SRVS 1,187.00 PICTOMETRY COST SHARE 2017 155508 00024954 7400 6505 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 1,187.00 139728 5/5/2017 100077 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 93.69 WELL HOUSE LINE APR-MAY'17 155504 651-460-4974 7400 6411 TELEPHONE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 APR'17 93.69 139752 5/5/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL 27.96 EXTRA POWER STRIPS 155501 K76527 7400 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 27.96 R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 61 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No BU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139757 5/5/2017 112561 RICOH USA,INC 970.05 COPIER LEASES APR-MAY'17 155259 98670483 7400 6555 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 07400 04 970.05 07400 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 24,188.39 139619 4/2812017 113946 BASIC BUILDERS 3,000.00 ESCROW RELEASE 22404 CANOVA CT 155301 22404 CANOVA COURT500 2255 DEPOSITS PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 07500 02 3,000.00 139634 4/28/2017 115591 DEEGAN,JAMES 3,000.00 ESCROW RELEASE 612-7TH ST 155304 612 7TH STREET 7500 2255 DEPOSITS PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 07500 02 3,000.00 139639 4/28/2017 113096 ETERNITY HOMES,LLC 2,500.00 425 THIRD ST CURB BREAK PERMIT 155291 CURB BRKING ESCROW) 2255 DEPOSITS PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 07500 02 REL 2,500.00 139694 4128/2017 115583 ROTO ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY 2,500.00 18275 EXETER CT CURB BRK PRMT 155295 CURB BRKING ESCRO'800 2255 DEPOSITS PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 07500 02 REL 2,500.00 139724 5/5/2017 115062 DISTINCTIVE DESIGN BUILD,LLC 3,000.00 ESCROW RELEASE 22426 CANTREL 155510 22426 CANTREL WAY 7500 2255 DEPOSITS PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 07500 02 3,000.00 07500 ESCROW FUND 14,000.00 139432 4/7/2017 103172 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES 34.38- 154781 25490 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 34.38- 139462 4/7/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL 4.90- 154732 58648 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 .18- 154744 K06976 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 .10- 154745 K06876 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 .27- 154746 K06861 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 5.45- 139494 4/14/2017 112111 CRAZY CRAYONS,LLC 11.28- 154276 1007 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 11.28- R55CKS2 LOGIS601V CITY OF FARMINGTON 5/9/2017 15:58:21 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 62 4/1/2017 - 5/10/2017 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No EU Obj Sub Subledger Account Description BU Description Co Dept Div 139524 4/14/2017 101254 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 6.03- 154944 152126842/28367911 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 6.03- 139556 4/21/2017 113887 CLEANLITES RECYLING,INC MN 10.34- 155052 IN0001994 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 10.34- 139571 4/21/2017 111773 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS,LLC 6.27- 155019 IN1559259 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 6.27- 139628 4/28/2017 100058 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 25.99- 155216 2131-434854 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 2.57- 155220 2131-435279 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 1.80- 155232 2131-435150 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 30.36- 139680 4/28/2017 113031 NRG RELIABILITY SOLUTIONS LLC 10.96- 155275 3347-1704 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 10.96- 139752 5/5/2017 100093 PELLICCI HARDWARE&RENTAL .04- 155482 K07685 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 .14- 155499 K87683 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 .18- 20170401 4/3/2017 100394 XCEL ENERGY .81- 154401 51-4874005 FEB'17 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 .81- 20170407 4/18/2017 108980 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION 42,76- 154913 0502362190 MAR'17 9999 2415 MN SALES TAX DUE CASH COMPANY 09999 42,76- 09999 CASH COMPANY 158.62- APPROVALS• '4.9' 72-7. 4, LARSON PIP BARTHOLOMAY Report Totals 3,294,020.45 ___ BERNHJELM 'CRAIG • DONNELLY i�``�Ai�► City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 444.,, www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Approve Agreement Prairieview Park Basketball Court Construction-Parks DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION The approved 2017 Park Improvement Fund budget included funding to have a new basketball court constructed in Prairieview Park. A map is attached showing the location of Prairieview Park. DISCUSSION The city council approved master plan for Prairieview Park identifies the construction of a new full court basketball court. The master plan is attached. Construction work by the contractor will include the preparation of a Class 5 base, installation of a bituminous court surface and fmish grading around the bituminous surface. Park maintenance staff will be responsible for seeding and erosion control on the areas that were disturbed during construction of the basketball court. Park maintenance staff will also be responsible for installing new basketball poles and backboards and for painting the lines on the court. Staff solicited quotes from ten paving contractors to construct the new basketball court. Two contractors submitted quotes for the project.Attached is Exhibit A, a tabulation form showing the quotes received. The low quote submitted by Bituminous Roadways, Inc. from Mendota Heights, Minnesota was in the amount of$18,074.80. The contractor has previously completed the same type of basketball court project work in the past for the city and staff was pleased with the contractor's work. One of the city council's priorities is to provide core government services at a high quality level Approving the agreement form with Bituminous Roadways, Inc. to construct the new basketball court allows the city to provide a park system at a high quality level. BUDGET IMPACT The 2017 Park Improvement Fund budget showed an estimated cost of$25,000 needed to fund the basketball court project.After subtracting the$18,074.80 from the budgeted amount, there remains a balance of$6,925.20 for new basketball poles and backboards. These will be purchased separately from this contract and installed by park maintenance staff. The additional costs of these items will not exceed the remaining balance. ACTION REQUESTED Staff is requesting the city council approve the attached agreement with Bituminous Roadways, Inc. for the Prairieview Park basketball court project in the amount of$18,074.80. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material Prairieview Park Location Map D Backup Material Prairieview Park Master Plan D Exhibit Exhibit A Project Quote Tabulation Form © Contract Agreement Form Prairieview Park Location Map tV7� 1iit. ;� �: iii _ ..1 ,jai131 f 1 �� Y i t It Li Q s.�l: �`1. r ' i r1■L. ICA N 4'• kap :...ti LJbY�ti ��, I: ai�� s - ng � Feil;E[l "Iv . L li 1-,�y it t 1 '+.. ?4; if t! 1.4 / ► trj L I. • ` tl te. 1. R4 r u j �;° is �I r_e R;, . ,h1dFn1$G: EbA '��':U E CCL - 'o r1.1._► U a 'J �yii�• may; • 11"!,6_ •'110. _tir• '11 1 1 . 1 11e ei milli- ,�eaw 5 L. F T. 4_ ill/ ' • • fte t1.i� .* LA aIILI ►, L1 �'�� vigo .,,,, PI 1 - ' • !Ali • < i 1 _d .11: • k"�a ft R.,�cd3- rr wC1 �gttiin I- r- ,'. L' ~%lr a H,*f�si a trA�el ., ". .1 �4` `1 . 1 . . _ .11E � trtb`_.0 L._:_ku i�l 1 P ' i- -- _ ?` Cry , — to tr,d �� — n _i. - ....3•011- milli i !E%PEW _ Le_ it i ilk1 ! I'll'''iliki itr t R Ss, • la r 2E,T. t - - yfi.--0-- --r. .— -. , - - - 550�i 4: ...... '-'11/6"* I 1 pi , i , ., . ...m. , .-".----5— . ---4.,-, . ,0`71,04.146 ' . - lih-V • , , Figtr.mt.' ,' I III ri in . i ,,,,„w T .L i , k ffC M x :,4 . ' le rr.-i ix�s�- �-1i iftfiam5 - a� I' •Sl' 1i ,•. -^ aik:1 January 13, 2017 1:9,600 0 437.5 875 1,750 ft I I 4 4 l 5 5 5 ll 0 135 270 540 m Property Information Disclaimer.Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate,but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal,survey,or for zoning verification. Prairieview Park City Council Approved Master Plan-September 28,2009 PRAIRIEVIEW PARK OPPORTUNITIES $ SHELTER EXISTING 5'SIDEWALK -- •. BASKETBALLC COURT''" -^ •' BASKETBALL COURT PARK AREA-4 ACRES HICKORY STREET NEW SECURITY LIGHT EXISTING PARK AMENITIES PROPOSED TREES -- ------------ --�. _ PROPOSED PLAYGROUND • BASEBALL FIELD 12-13 YEARS OLDS PROPOSED BASKETBALL COURT 110114011r g= BENCH PROPOSED _._= BALL COURT. • Oil EXPANSION(2-5 YEAR ? .. OLDS) • PLAYGROUND 2-12 YEAR OLDS 40' 1 . • BASKETBALL COURT-40'LONG BY 25'WIDE I EXISTING PLAYGROUND • 5'WIDE SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE OF PARK ' ��(2-12 YEAR OLDS) • PARK ENTRANCE SIGN • 2 WASTE RECEPTACLES '� - • 2 BENCHES • 2 PICNIC TABLES ll CO t PROPOSED PARK IMPROVEMENTS m I dimana ) , • • CONSTRUCT PICNIC SHELTER-40'LONG BY 25'WIDE WITH 6 PICNIC TABLES •% A. -- • CONSTRUCT FULL SIZED BASKETBALL COURT-84'LONG EXISTING BALL FIELD A • EXPAND PLAYGROUND TO INCLUDE EQUIPMENT FOR 2-5 / HI YEAR OLDS EXISTING TREES • CONSTRUCT 10'WIDE WALKING TRAIL ON EAST,SOUTH AND WEST EDGES OF PARK TO COMPLETE LOOP i • •INSTALL NEW ADDITIONAL PARK SIGN ON SOUTH EDGE OF et„ EXISTING TREES PARKDA• PLANT SHADE TREES ill • INSTALL SECURITY LIGHT • CONSTRUCT 2 BOCCEE BALL COURTS i • INSTALL ONE GRILL 5 PROPOSED TREES • 10'WIDE TRAIL CONSTRUCTED ALONG TH 50 TO CONNECT lilt PROPOSED 10' PARK TO TH 3 i BITUMINOUS TRAIL • INSTALL ADDITIONAL WASTE RECEPTACLESilk II • % I MAP KEY I_ PARK BOUNDARY an, I I ` _--_O — — --� PAVED 10'TRAIL i. PROPOSED PARK SIGN • EXISTING TREES,TYPICAL PROPOSED TRAIL TO TH 3 PROPOSED TREES,TYPICAL MIN BENCH ?H 50 4 Farmington , Minnesota EXHIBIT A 2017 Prairieview Park Basketball Court Quote Tabulation Form Name of Contractor Quote Submitted Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $18,074.80 Minnesota Roadways Company $47,730.00 AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 2017, between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS,INC.,a Minnesota corporation("Contractor"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL UNDERTAKINGS HEREIN CONTAINED,THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents", all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement B. Contractor Proposal dated May 8,2017,attached as Exhibit"A." C. Request for Quotes 2017 Prairieview Park Basketball Court Project Specifications,attached as Exhibit"B". In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document "A" having the first priority and Contract Document"C"having the last priority. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall provide the goods,services,and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY. The City shall pay the Contractor in accordance with the bid. 4. SOFTWARE LICENSE. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Contract contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. 5. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. 6. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Contractor shall complete its obligations on or before September 29, 2017. 7. PAYMENT. a. When the obligations of the Contractor have been fulfilled, inspected, and accepted, the City will pay the Contractor. Such payment shall be made not later than thirty (30) days after completion,certification thereof,and invoicing by the Contractor. b. No final payment shall be made under this Contract until Contractor has satisfactorily established compliance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. Section 290.92. A certificate of the commissioner shall satisfy this requirement with respect to the Contractor or any subcontractor. 8. EXTRA SERVICES. No claim will be honored for compensation for extra services or beyond the scope of this Agreement or the not-to-exceed price for the services identified in the proposal without written submittal by the Contractor, and approval of an amendment by the City, with specific estimates of type, time, and maximum costs, prior to commencement of the work. 9. PROMPT PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 471.25, Subdivision 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor's receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of one and one-half percent(1'/A %)per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of$100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees,incurred in bringing the action. 10. WORKER'S COMPENSATION. If Contractor does public work, the Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY. Contractor shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage and maintain it at all times throughout the life of the Contract,with the City included as an additional name insured by endorsement: Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate,products and completed operations Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Products and Completed Operations Insurance shall be maintained for a minimum period of three (3)years after final payment and Contractor shall continue to provide evidence of such coverage to 169812 2 City on an annual basis during the aforementioned period;or if any reason Contractor's work ceases before final payment,for a minimum period of three(3)years from the date Contractor ceases work. Property Damage Liability Insurance shall include coverage for the following hazards: X (Explosion) C (Collapse) U (Underground) Contractual Liability(identifying the contract): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Personal Injury,with Employment Exclusion deleted: $2,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability(owned,non-owned,hired): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence 12. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Contractor must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13 AS,as if it were a government entity. In the event Contractor receives a request to release data, Contractor must immediately notify City. City will give Contractor instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Contractor's officers', agents', city's, partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement, 13. RECORDS. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records of expenses involved in the performance of services. 14. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the bid shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and 169812 3 equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications. The Contractor further warrants to the City that all goods and services furnished under the Contract will be in conformance with Contract Documents and that the goods are of merchantable quality and are fit for the use for which they are sold. This warranty is in addition to any manufacturer's standard warranty y,and any warranty provided by law. 15. NONDISCRIMINATION. All Contractors and subcontractors employed shall comply with all applicable provisions of all federal, state and municipal laws which prohibit discrimination in employment to members of a protected class and all rules and regulations, promulgated and adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor will include a similar provision in all subcontracts entered into for the performance of this contract. 16. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to defend,hold harmless, and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, and employees, for and against any and all claims, demands, actions, or causes of action, of whatever nature or character, arising from the Consultant's performance of work or services provided for herein. The Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of all employees on the site and shall provide reasonable protection to prevent damage or loss to the property on the site or properties adjacent thereto and to work, materials and equipment under the Contractor's control. 17. WAIVER. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract by either party,whether of the same or any other covenant, condition, or obligation. 18. GOVERNING LAW. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Contract. 19. SEVERABILITY. If any provision,term, or condition of this Contract is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not effect the remaining provisions, terms, and conditions of this Contract, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term, or condition renders this Contract impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties'entire contract. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete, and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings, or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. 21. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Contractor. In the event of termination, the City shall be obligated to the Contractor for payment of amounts due and owing for materials provided or for services performed or furnished to the date and time of termination. 169812 4 Dated: , 2017. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Todd Larson,Mayor By: David McKnight, City Administrator Dated: , 2017 CONTRACTOR: BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS,INC. By: Its: 169812 5 b(\i'lb.i.L- • City of Farmington "IS430 Third Street Farmington,Minnesota 651.280,6800•Fax 651.280.6899 \ 4T'A PINy'° www.cifarmingtondnn,us • 2017 Prairieview Park Basketball Court Project Quote Form Due on or before: 10:00 a.m.Monday,May 8,2017 Randy Distad City of Farmington 430 Third St Farmington,MN. 55024 Interested Contractors • The undersigned,being familiar with your local conditions,having made the field inspections and investigations deemed necessary,having studied the plans and specifications for the work and being familiar with all factors and other conditions affecting the work and costs thereof,hereby propose to furnish all labor, tools,materials, skills, equipment all else necessary to completely construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications on file, All unit prices shall include all applicable sales taxes. I. PROPOSAL Main Items Unit Qty. Unit Price Totals • 1. Mobilization LS 1 $ A i x0• $ r DOO. aD • 2. Geotextile Fabric (MnDOT 3733 -Type V) SF 4,752 $ £, 4-i $ e.3,D$Ya ss4 3. 6 inches 100%crushed limestone quarry . Ton 180 $ oT/ 0 $ . 77ej. or recycled equal(MnDOT 3138) • 4, 3"SPWEA230B bituminous wear course SF 4,280 $• 1. 4/4' $* �� JI. try Total Bid including Sales Tax(1+2+3+4) $ /4;e74/. .$7.6 • • • The City shall open,tabulate and select the lowest quote.The City shall contact by email the contractor submitting the lowest quote informing them they submitted the low quote for the project.All other contractors submitting a quote will be notified by email that they did not submit the low quote for the project.Included with the email will be a tabulation forth that compares all contractor quotes received by the City for the project. • In submitting this quote,it is understood that the Owner retains the right to reject any and all quotes and to waive • irregularities and informalities therein and to award the contract to the best interests of the Owner. In submitting this quote,it is understood that payment will be by cash or check. It is understood that quotes may not be withdrawn for a period of 60 days after the date and time set for the opening of quotes. It is understood that the owner reserves the right to retain the three lowest quotes as determined by the Owner for a period not to exceed 60 days after the date set for the opening of quotes. Submitted by: • tr009/n10dS , gd//)AVa 141n1C. aCoi.oration ompany (an +•7vi'ual) --,e-40,111111 X,)... • •-c.joi a i rr14Son) • Ait5 A.A) Title /.S'o?I a nmEkee Qid Address , Fnl4 or,} f'/'El asi i rs . ' / ?ö City, State,Zip Code ! W i Telephone • M)CO @&r€omots. co Email Address • •A ttR,yly City of Farmington 430 Third Street ' `• "?- I Farmington,Minnesota "4•,.1° 651.280.6800•Fax 651.280.6899 ""A°a0 www.clfarmington.mn.us EXHIBIT B FARMINGTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2017 PRAIRIEVIEW PARK BASKETBALL COURT PROJECT REQUEST FOR QUOTES APRIL 21, 2017 FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA I. Introduction: The City of Farmington Park&Recreation Department is accepting quotes for the construction of a full court bituminous basketball court surface measuring 50 feet wide by 84 feet long and an accessible connecting bituminous trail from an existing concrete sidewalk to the basketball court measuring 8 feet wide by 10 feet long. Quote must be submitted in a sealed envelope with the following title: "2017 Prairieview Park Basketball Court Project". II. Prairieview Park Location: The address of Prairieview Park is 1100 12th Street. The construction entrance to Prairieview Park is from the cul-de-sac on 11th Street. All equipment used by the contractor or subcontractor(s) should access the park site via the cul-de-sac located on 11th Street. Under no circumstances should any other entrances to the park be used. There is a map enclosed showing the location of the park. III. Project Completion: All work associated with this project shall be completed on or before Friday, September 29,2017. The submitted quote shall include all labor,materials and applicable sales tax. IV. Rejection of Quotes: The City of Farmington reserves the right to reject any and all quotes, to waive irregularities and informalities therein. V. Site Visits: You may arrange a visit to the site if you wish by contacting the following Parks and Recreations Department staff people: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director Farmington City Hall 430 Third Street Farmington,MN 55024 651-280-6851 Email:rdistad a ci.farmington.rnn.us VI. Insurance Requirements The vendor's insurance company will waive its right to assert the immunity of the City as a defense to any claims made under said insurance. The vendor shall take out and maintain during the life of the contract,vendor's General Liability &Automobile Insurance, including vendor's Contingent or Protective Insurance to protect the vendor from damage claims arising for operations under this contract,which shall protect him or her and any subcontractor performing work covered by this contract, from claims for damages for personal injury including accidental death under this contract whether such operations by him or herself or by any subcontractor or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them and the amounts of the insured shall be as follows: Worker's Compensation Insurance Coverage B—Employer's liability with limits of not less than: $100,000 Bodily injury by disease per employee $500,000 Bodily injury by disease aggregate $100,000 Bodily injury by accident The vendor and his/her subcontractors, if any,must provide Worker's Compensation Insurance for all employees, in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota, including Coverage B,Employer's liability. Evidence of subcontractor insurance shall be filed with the vendor. Automobile Liability Insurance 1. Minimum limits of liability coverage for passenger vehicles such as car, van or pickup truck, unless it be being used to perform the service. If vehicle is towing equipment or a commercial vehicle, and all other vehicles then liability limits shall be the same as required under#c. General Liability Insurance,below. 2. Required Coverages The vendor and his/her subcontractors,if any, shall maintain insurance to cover liability arising out of the operations,use, or maintenance of all owned,non-owned and hired automobiles. Evidence of subcontractor insurance shall be filed with the vendor. General Liability Insurance Minimum limits of liability shall be as follows: • $2,000,000 Per Occurrence • $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate • $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate applying to Products/Completed Operations Insurance coverages should include the following: • Premises and Operations Bodily Injury and Property Damage • Personal and Advertising Injury • Blanket Contractual • City of Farmington listed as additional insured The vendor shall maintain insurance to cover claims, which may arise from operations under a contract with the City,whether such operations are by vendor or subcontractor or by anyone directly or indirectly employed under this contract. If vendor's work involves working with,or the potential release of, a hazardous substance, then the vendor shall be required to procure double the insurance policy limits of those above. Contract Insurance Requirements - Supplemental Should your quote be selected and the City contract with your company, you will be required to submit a Certificate of Liability Insurance policy that will be in compliance with the specifications in the contract.An important requirement of the contract insurance is that the City be listed as "Additional Insured"by being added to your liability policy by endorsement. This endorsement must accompany the certificate and must be provided to the City prior to the Contractor beginning any work for the City. It may be mailed via regular U.S.mail to: Randy Distad,Parks and Recreation Director Farmington City Hall 430 Third Street Farmington,MN 55024 It may also be sent electronically to the following email address: rdistad@ci.farinington,mn.us VII. Submitting Quotes: The described finished project will be for constructing a full court bituminous basketball court surface that has a dimension of 50 feet wide by 84 feet long and 10 feet long by 8 feet wide accessible connecting bituminous trail from an existing concrete sidewalk to the basketball court. A separate document included with this mailing describes the project in more detail with specifications for the construction of the full court basketball court. Quotes must be submitted on the attached Quote Submittal Form. The City will open, tabulate and select the lowest quote. After the quotes have been tabulated, the City will contact all of the contractors via email about the results of the quotes submitted. Deadlines to submit a quote will be Monday,May 8,2017 on or before 10:00 a.m. All work associated with the project will be completed on or before Friday,September 29, 2017. Your quote should be submitted to the following Parks and Recreation Department staff person: Randy Distad Farmington Parks&Recreation Department 430 Third Street Farmington,MN 55024 Phone: 651-280-6851 Fax: 651-280-6899 Email: rdistad@ci.fartnington.mn.us ci.farmington.mn.us �o�FARMi�, City of Farmington 430 Third Street '!'ham = Farmington,Minnesota ao 651.280.6800•Fax 651.280.6899 A PROM www cLfarmington.mn.us Specifications and Location of the Basketball Court Work to be Completed in Prairieview Park I. Location Prior to construction beginning, City staff will mark/stake the locations of where the new full court basketball court surface is to be constructed. Included in the packet is a park master plan showing the general location of the basketball court. II. Specifications Curb Protection: The contractor shall protect with proper material the face of all curbs (if any)that are driven over to access the construction sites. The contractor shall remove this material when the project work has been completed. Erosion Control: The perimeter of the construction site must have a silt fence installed around the site. The silt fence material shall in accordance with MnDOT Specification 3886. Silt fence shall be installed per city plate number ERO-01A and in accordance with MnDOT Specification 2573. Base: The base for the basketball court shall be excavated to a depth of 6 inches by width of 54 feet and length of 88 feet. All material excavated shall be stockpiled on site to be used for the restoration along the edge of the basketball court. A geotextile fabric(MnDOT 3733 -Type V) shall be placed on the excavated sub grade area and then 6 inches of 100%crushed limestone quarry or recycled equal (MnDOT 3138) shall be placed on top of the geotextile fabric and compacted. The base for the accessible connecting bituminous trail from an existing concrete sidewalk to the basketball court shall be excavated to a depth of 6 inches by 10 feet wide by 10 feet in length. All material excavated shall be stockpiled on site to be used for the restoration along the edge of the trail. Then 6 inches of 100% crushed limestone quarry or recycled equal (MnDOT 3138) shall be placed for the base material and then compacted in accordance with MnDOT Specifications 2211. Surfacing: The new basketball court surface and short trail connection shall consist of one lift of 3 inches, SPWEA230B bituminous wear course. The finished basketball court bituminous surface dimension shall be 50 feet wide by 84 feet in length. The finished surface of the connecting trail shall have a dimension of 8 feet wide by 10 feet long. The surface shall be installed and compacted in accordance with MnDOT Specifications 2360, Slope: The basketball court shall not exceed .5% cross slope and .5%running slope. The trail cross slope and running slope shall match with the cross slope and running slope of the basketball court and the existing concrete sidewalk. Restoration: The contractor will be responsible for backfilling and completing finish grading along the basketball court edges using the excavated material that was stockpiled on site. The area will be finish graded to match existing slopes or terrain. The finished grade will not contain any clumps of sod, clumps of dirt or any debris or rock larger than one-half inch in diameter. Any excess dirt remaining after finish grading has been completed will be hauled away by contractor unless the city has use for the material then the contractor will haul the material to the City's stockpile site. The City will be responsible for seeding and placing a fiber matrix blanket over the seeded area after the contractor has satisfactorily completed their work on finish grading the construction site. Underground Utility Locations: The contractor will be required to place the Gopher One call for locating underground utilities. Site Plan and Map: A park master plan for Prairieview Park and a map have been included in this packet for your review. 4FARM04City of Farmington 430 Third Street ..-.,h^ Farmington,Minnesota 146 16 51.280.6800.Fax 651.280.6899 er.a rxoMoa www.ci.farmington.mn.us 2017 Prairieview Park Basketball Court Project Quote Form Due on or before: 10:00 a.m.Monday,May 8,2017 Randy Distad City of Farmington 430 Third St Farmington,MN. 55024 Interested Contractors The undersigned,being familiar with your local conditions,having made the field inspections and investigations deemed necessary,having studied the plans and specifications for the work and being familiar with all factors and other conditions affecting the work and costs thereof,hereby propose to furnish all labor, tools,materials, skills,equipment all else necessary to completely construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications on file. All unit prices shall include all applicable sales taxes. I. PROPOSAL Main Items Unit Qty. Unit Price Totals 1. Mobilization LS 1 $ $ 2. Geotextile Fabric(MnDOT 3733 -Type V) SF 4,752 $ $ 3. 6 inches 100%crushed limestone quarry Ton 180 $ $ or recycled equal (MnDOT 3138) 4. 3" SPWEA230B bituminous wear course SF 4,280 $ $ Total Bid including Sales Tax(1+2+3+4) $ The City shall open,tabulate and select the lowest quote.The City shall contact by email the contractor submitting the lowest quote informing them they submitted the low quote for the project.All other contractors submitting a quote will be notified by email that they did not submit the low quote for the project.Included with the email will be a tabulation form that compares all contractor quotes received by the City for the project. In submitting this quote,it is understood that the Owner retains the right to reject any and all quotes and to waive irregularities and informalities therein and to award the contract to the best interests of the Owner. In submitting this quote,it is understood that payment will be by cash or check. It is understood that quotes may not be withdrawn for a period of 60 days after the date and time set for the opening of quotes. It is understood that the owner reserves the right to retain the three lowest quotes as determined by the Owner for a period not to exceed 60 days after the date set for the opening of quotes. Submitted by: Circle One (a Corporation) Company (an Individual) (a Partnership) By Title Address City, State,Zip Code Telephone Email Address e t City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 ?.,,no. www.c i.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Robin Hanson, Finance Director SUBJECT: 2016 Management and Comprehensive Annual Financial Report DATE: May 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION Each year the city's financial records are audited by an independent public accounting firm. The goal of an independent audit is to provide reasonable assurance that the city's financial statements are free of material misstatement. The audit involves examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Upon completion, the auditors render an audit opinion, review their management report with the city council, and the city publishes a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR)to provide you, city staff, citizens, investors, and other interested parties with useful information concerning the city's operations and financial position. DISCUSSION Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness, accuracy and reliability of the information presented in the CAFR. To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations, management has established a comprehensive internal framework that is designed both to protect the government's assets from loss, theft or misuse and to provide sufficient, reliable information for the preparation of the city's financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits, therefore, the City of Farmington's comprehensive framework of internal control has been designed to provide reasonable, rather than absolute assurance, that the financial statements will be free from material misstatement. As management,we assert that to the best of our knowledge and belief, the financial report is complete and reliable in all material respects. • The city's financial records have been audited by Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich& Co., P.A. (MMKR). Based upon their audit, they concluded there was a reasonable basis for rendering an unmodified opinion that the City of Farmington's financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. An unmodified opinion is issued when the independent auditor believes that the company's financial statements are sound; that is, the statements are free from material misstatement. Representatives of the audit firm will be at the city council meeting to review this year's audit, provide a financial overview of the city's 2016 results, share their internal control findings and answer questions. A copy of this year's Management Report, Special Purpose Reports and the CAFR are attached. This past year, 2016, was a very good year for the city and should be celebrated. • The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by$107,301,878 (net position)at the close of the most recent fiscal year. Of this amount, $17,717,961 (unrestricted net position)may be used to meet the government's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. • The city's total net position decreased by$506,929 in 2016, of this amount$132,335 or 26.1%was attributable to governmental activities, and$374,594 or 73.9%was attributable to business-type activities. • The city's total bonded debt increased by$5,208,466, or 16.8 percent, during the fiscal year due to a combination of the issuance of$9,620,000 of General Obligation Refunding Bonds and annual bond principal payments. • The city's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of$27,183,379 at December 31, 2016, an increase of$8,636,912 from the prior year. Approximately 37.5 percent of this total amount, $10,190,357, is available for use within the City's constraints and policies. • At the end of the current fiscal year, the unassigned fund balance for the General Fund was $5,031,529, or 41.2 percent, of 2017 General Fund budgeted expenditures and transfers out. The Government Finance Officers Association(GFOA)awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Farmington for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)for the year ended December 31, 2015. This was the seventh year the city received this prestigious national award. In order to be awarded this Certificate of Achievement,the government needs to publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR and has satisfied both GAAP and applicable legal requirements. The Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of only one year and we believe the current CAFR continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement program requirements. We will be submitting the 2016 report to the GFOA to determine eligibility for another certificate. As part of the auditors review of the city's internal control processes and compliance testing they identified one matter to communicate with the city council. The first is a lack of segregation of duties in the payroll area. This is considered a material weakness and was also shared with you last year. The lack of segregation of duties is not a reflection of the work of the staff involved. Rather, like other organizations with limited staff, it is a result of the inability to segregate certain duties due to the limited staff size. As stated earlier, the responsibility for both the accuracy and completeness of the financial records rests with the city. This is not accomplished by one person. It takes everyone working together to make this possible. I would like to recognize and thank everyone involved. • The Finance Department has done an excellent job maintaining the city's financial records.Increased customer service has resulted in new processes to learn, educate others about, and additional information to account for and reconcile. It has become more complicated. It requires a high degree of accuracy. They should be very proud of their work. • A special thank you to the Human Resources staff for all of their assistance with payroll and the related benefits. Each year the questions and data requested expand. They have done an excellent job. • City staff members diligently code and/or review invoices for payment, enter receipts, submit supporting documentation, answer our many questions and are very conscientious and conservative with their spending.All of these activities directly contribute to the accuracy and completeness of the city's financial records and improved financial strength. They deserve a big thank you for paying close attention to detail,patience with complying with our numerous accounting requirements, some of which seem very tedious to those outside of Finance and Accounting, and their willingness to learn new ways to process information. • The auditors did an excellent job. They were organized and asked very good questions. Each year their depth of understanding of the city and its processes and policies has increased. They were very thorough and respectful Each staff person was technically very strong and they were instrumental in the ongoing reporting for pension accounting and disclosure requirements. • Finally, I would like to thank you, Mayor,members of the City Council, and the City Administrator for your willingness to do what you believe is best for the city in the long-run. It is not easy; it is a constant balancing act.You have worked hard to strengthen the city's financial position and have demonstrated your commitment to long-term comprehensive financial planning. BUDGET IMPACT N/A ACTION REQUESTED Ask any questions you may have the auditors or city staff Once you are comfortable with the information provided a motion should be made to accept the auditor's reports. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material 2016 Farmington Management Report D Backup Material 2016 Farmington Special Purpose Report D Backup Material 2016 Farmington Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR) Management Report for City of Farmington,Minnesota December 31,2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PRINCIPALS Thomas A.Karnowski,CPA Paul A.Radosevich,CPA William J.Lauer,CPA James H.Eichten,CPA CERTIFIED LA. ...(R PUBLIC Aaron J.Nielsen,CPA ACCOUNTANTS Victoria L.Holinka,CPA/CMA To the City Council and Management City of Farmington,Minnesota We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City of Farmington, Minnesota's (the City) financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. We have organized this report into the following sections: • Audit Summary • Governmental Funds Overview • Enterprise Funds Overview • Government-Wide Financial Statements • Legislative Updates • Accounting and Auditing Updates We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our audit. The purpose of this report is solely to provide those charged with governance of the City, management, and those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process comments resulting from our audit process and information relevant to city finances in Minnesota. Accordingly,this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Minneapolis,Minnesota May 8,2017 Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK AUDIT SUMMARY The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or those charged with governance of the City. OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended December 31,2016,and the related notes to the financial statements. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information to you verbally and in our audit engagement letter. Professional standards also require that we communicate the following information related to our audit. PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit. AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS Based on our audit of the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31,2016: • We have issued an unmodified opinion on the City's basic financial statements. • We reported one matter involving the City's internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be a material weakness. Due to the limited size of the City's office staff,the City has limited segregation of duties in certain areas. • The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Governmental Auditing Standards. • We reported no findings based on our testing of the City's compliance with Minnesota laws and regulations. FOLLOW-UP ON PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As a part of our audit of the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, we performed procedures to follow-up on the findings and recommendations that resulted from our prior year audit. We reported the following findings that were corrected by the City in the current year: • One claim selected for testing was not reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to payment as required by Minnesota Statutes. The disbursement had been inadvertently omitted from the check listing submitted to the City Council for approval. Based on our testing, there is not a similar finding in the current year. -1- SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during the year ended December 31, 2016. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Where applicable, management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management, when applicable, were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit's financial statements taken as a whole. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were: • Net Other Post-Employment Benefit(OPEB)and Pension Liabilities—The City has recorded liabilities and activity for other post-employment benefits (OPEB) and pension benefits. These obligations are calculated using actuarial methodologies described in Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement (GASB) Nos. 45 and 68. These actuarial calculations include significant assumptions, including projected changes, healthcare insurance costs, investment returns,retirement ages,proportionate share,and employee turnover. • Depreciation — Management's estimates of depreciation expense are based on the estimated useful lives of the assets. • Compensated Absences—Management's estimate is based on current rates of pay, compensated absence balances, and the likelihood that sick leave will ultimately be paid at termination. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used by management to develop these estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear. MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge,there were no such consultations with other accountants. -2- DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT For purposes of this report, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated May 8,2017. OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. OTHER MATTERS We applied certain limited procedures to management's discussion and analysis and the pension and OPEB-related required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI. We were engaged to report on the supplemental information accompanying the financial statements which is not RSI. With respect to this supplemental information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the supplemental information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves. We were not engaged to report on the introductory and statistical sections which accompany the financial statements but are not RSI. We did not audit or perform other procedures on this other information and we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it. GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's governmental funds, which includes the General, special revenue, debt service, and capital project funds. These funds are used to account for the basic services the City provides to all of its citizens, which are financed primarily with property taxes. The governmental fund information in the City's financial statements focuses on budgetary compliance and the sufficiency of each governmental fund's current assets to finance its current liabilities. PROPERTY TAXES Minnesota cities rely heavily on local property tax levies to support their governmental fund activities. For the 2015 fiscal year, local ad valorem property tax levies provided 39.8 percent of the total governmental fund revenues for cities over 2,500 in population,and 35.6 percent for cities under 2,500 in population. Property tax levies certified by Minnesota cities for 2016 increased about 4.8 percent over 2015,compared to an increase of 4.0 percent the prior year. The total market value of property in Minnesota cities increased about 5.7 percent for the 2016 levy year. While the percentage of market value growth was less than the 8.5 percent increase for levy year 2015, it was considerably larger than the 1.1 percent growth experienced in levy year 2014. Market values increased across all property categories for 2016, with gains in the market values of non-homestead residential properties (9.1 percent) and other properties (7.3 percent) outpacing the market value gain of residential homestead properties (5.0 percent), commercial/industrial properties (4.9 percent), and farms (0.1 percent). The market values used for levying property taxes are based on the previous fiscal year (e.g., market values for taxes levied in 2016 were based on assessed values as of January 1, 2015), so the trend of change in these market values lags somewhat behind the housing market and economy in general. The City's taxable market value increased 12.5 percent for taxes payable in 2015 and 8.5 percent for taxes payable in 2016. The following graph shows the City's changes in taxable market value over the past 10 years: Taxable Market Value $2,000,000,000 $1,800,000,000 $1,600,000,000 - $1,400,000,000 ■ - . I -$1,000,000,000 p • $800,000,000 ■ ■ t ■ MI U I■ ■ ■ ■ $400,000,000 ■ - - - - - ■ $200,000,000 ■ ■ ■ `' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 -4- Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state's property classification system to each property's market value. Each property classification, such as commercial or residential, has a different calculation and uses different rates. Consequently, a city's total tax capacity will change at a different rate than its total market value, as tax capacity is affected by the proportion of the City's tax base that is in each property classification from year-to-year, as well as legislative changes to tax rates. The City's tax capacity increased 11.4 percent for taxes payable in 2015 and 7.9 percent for taxes payable in 2016. The following graph shows the City's change in tax capacities over the past 10 years: Local Net Tax Capacity $20,000,000 - $18,000,000 - . 11111 -- ------ $16,000,000 - $14,000,000 $12,000,000 - $10,000,000 -- - -- $8,000,000L II __ $6,000,000 $4,000,000 . $2,000,000 - ..-,. . $2,000,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 The following table presents the average tax rates applied to city residents for each of the last two levy years,along with comparative state-wide and metro area rates: Rates expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity All Cities Seven-County City of State-Wide Metro Area Farmington 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Average tax rate City 46.9 46.5 43.4 43.0 61.5 59.2 County 44.7 44.1 42.9 42.3 29.6 28.6 School 27.1 27.5 28.3 28.6 53.5 57.6 Special taxing 6.9 6.9 8.8 8.7 3.7 3.8 Total 125.6 125.0 123.4 122.6 148.3 149.2 The City's portion of the tax rate is higher than the average Minnesota city. The City has historically received more of its governmental fund revenue from property taxes than the average Minnesota city,due to the lower than average amount of aid it typically receives from the state. The City portion of the tax rates for 2016 showed a small decrease from the prior year, as a levy increase was offset by improvements in property tax capacities. -5- GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES The following table summarizes the changes in the fund balances of the City's governmental funds during the year ended December 31,2016,presented both by fund balance classification and by fund: Governmental Funds Change in Fund Balance Fund Balance as of December 31, Increase 2016 2015 (Decrease) Fund balances of governmental funds Total by classification Nonspendable $ 33,872 $ 6,184 $ 27,688 Restricted 16,959,150 5,776,314 11,182,836 Committed 5,158,828 8,025,185 (2,866,357) Assigned — 4,250 (4,250) Unassigned 5,031,529 4,734,534 296,995 Total—governmental funds $ 27,183,379 $ 18,546,467 $ 8,636,912 Total by fund General $ 5,065,291 $ 4,744,818 $ 320,473 Debt Service 16,663,140 5,482,325 11,180,815 State Aid Construction Capital Projects 396,538 1,731,020 (1,334,482) Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects 2,603,763 3,689,276 (1,085,513) Permanent Improving Revolving Capital Projects 151,184 135,560 15,624 Maintenance Capital Projects 136,382 968,730 (832,348) Nonmajor 2,167,081 1,794,738 372,343 Total—governmental funds $ 27,183,379 $ 18,546,467 $ 8,636,912 In total, the fund balances of the City's governmental funds increased by $8,636,912 during the year ended December 31,2016. The increase in restricted fund balances of $11,182,836 relates primarily to interfund transfers and refunding bond proceeds recorded in the Debt Service Fund, which will be used to redeem several outstanding bond issues on their optional payment date of February 1,2017. Committed fund balance decreased$2,866,357,mainly due to the combination of transfers from the State Aid Construction Capital Projects Fund to the Debt Service Fund for future bond redemption, and the City electing to redeem another outstanding debt issue in 2016 using resources available in the Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects Fund. Unassigned fund balance increased $296,995 due primarily to positive operating results in the General Fund. -6- GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES The following table presents the per capita revenue of the City's governmental funds for the past three years,along with state-wide averages. We have included the most recent comparative state-wide averages available from the Office of the State Auditor to provide a benchmark for interpreting the City's data. The amounts received from the typical major sources of governmental fund revenue will naturally vary between cities based on factors such as a city's stage of development, location, size and density of its population, property values, services it provides, and other attributes. It will also differ from year-to-year due to the effect of inflation and changes in its operation. Also, certain data in these tables may be classified differently than how they appear in the City's financial statements in order to be more comparable to the state-wide information, particularly in separating capital expenditures from current expenditures. We have designed this section of our management report using per capita data in order to better identify unique or unusual trends and activities of the City. We intend for this type of comparative and trend information to complement, rather than duplicate, information in the management's discussion and analysis. An inherent difficulty in presenting per capita information is the accuracy of the population count, which for most years is based on estimates. This table and the one on the following page exclude the activity of the Farmington Economic Development Authority,a component unit of the City. Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita With State-Wide Averages by Population Class State-Wide City of Farmington Year December 31,2015 2014 2015 2016 Population 10,000-20,000 20,000-100,000 22,386 22,451 22,451 Property taxes $ 414 $ 443 $ 493 $ 511 $ 528 Tax increments 33 37 — — — ' Franchise and other taxes 42 39 12 12 12 Special assessments 52 59 37 29 24 Licenses and permits 31 43 23 17 29 Intergovernmental revenues 322 156 45 93 73 Charges for services 85 94 40 37 48 Other 62 58 17 17 24 Total revenue $ 1,041 $ 929 $ 667 $ 716 $ 738 The City's governmental fund revenues for 2016 were $16,575,132, an increase of $511,321 (3.2 percent), or $22 per capita from the prior year. Revenue from property taxes was $17 per capita higher than the prior year due to increases in the City's levy and excess tax increments redistributed by the county from the City's decertified TIF District #2 City Center. Licenses and permits were $12 per capita higher than last year, mainly as a result of increased residential development. Intergovernmental revenue was down $20 per capita from the previous year, as the City received less state aid for street improvements in 2016. The City has historically received more of its governmental fund revenue from property taxes than the average Minnesota city, due to the lower than average amount of aid it typically receives from the state and the debt levies for the City's capital improvement bonds. -7- The expenditures of governmental funds will also vary from state-wide averages and from year-to-year, based on the City's circumstances.Expenditures are classified into three types as follows: • Current — These are typically the general operating type expenditures occurring on an annual basis, and are primarily funded by general sources such as taxes and intergovernmental revenues. • Capital Outlay and Construction—These expenditures do not occur on a consistent basis,more typically fluctuating significantly from year-to-year. Many of these expenditures are project-oriented, and are often funded by specific sources that have benefited from the expenditure,such as special assessment improvement projects. • Debt Service—Although the expenditures for debt service may be relatively consistent over the term of the respective debt, the funding source is the important factor. Some debt may be repaid through specific sources such as special assessments or redevelopment funding, while other debt may be repaid with general property taxes. The City's expenditures per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with state-wide averages,are presented in the following table: Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita With State-Wide Averages by Population Class State-Wide City of Farmington Year December 31,2015 2014 2015 2016 Population 10,000-20,000 20,000-100,000 22,386 22,451 22,451 Current General government $ 109 $ 89 $ 77 $ 87 $ 89 Public safety 244 261 218 229 236 Streets and highways 117 99 91 88 89 Culture and recreation 108 94 65 69 67 All other 70 89 2 4 2 648 632 453 477 483 Capital outlay and construction 389 286 82 209 123 Debt service Principal 178 117 106 129 196 Interest and fiscal charges 40 33 49 46 49 218 150 155 175 245 Total expenditures $ 1,255 $ 1,068 $ 690 $ 861 $ 851 Total expenditures in the City's governmental funds for 2016 were $19,120,332, a decrease of$194,566 (1.0 percent),or$10 per capita, from the previous year. Capital outlay and construction expenditures were $86 per capita lower than last year, primarily due to funds expended for the Henderson Project and the joint county/city 195th Street Reconstruction Project in the previous year. This was partially offset by a $70 per capita increase debt service, due to the City electing to redeem the 2017 through 2026 maturities of its 2005C General Obligation Capital Improvement bonds on the optional February 1, 2016 call date using available internal resources. -8- GENERAL FUND The City's General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration of the municipal operation,police and fire protection, building inspection, streets and highway maintenance,and parks and recreation. The graph below illustrates the change in the General Fund financial position over the last five years. We have also included a line representing annual expenditures and transfers out to reflect the change in the size of the General Fund operation over the same period. General Fund Financial Position Year Ended December 31, $13,000,000 $12,000,000 $11,000,000 $10,000,000 $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 MN Fund Balance $2,679,764 $3,092,401 $4,107,560 $4,744,818 $5,065,291 oCash(Net) $291,138 $1,604,238 $2,934,620 $3,385,793 $3,875,421 Exp&Trans Out $10,092,097 $10,945,255 $10,497,656 $11,006,155 $12,228,226 The City's General Fund cash and investments, net of interfund borrowing at December 31, 2016 was $489,628 higher than at the previous year-end. Total fund balance at December 31, 2016 of$5,065,291 represented an increase of$320,473 from the prior year,as compared to a breakeven budget. As the graph illustrates, the City has generally been able to maintain healthy cash and fund balance levels as the volume of financial activity has grown. This is an important factor because a government, like any organization, requires a certain amount of equity to operate. A healthy financial position allows the City to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the adequate and consistent funding of services, repairs, and unexpected costs; and is a factor in determining the City's bond rating and resulting interest costs. Maintaining an adequate fund balance has become increasingly important given the fluctuations in state funding for cities in recent years. A trend that is typical to Minnesota local governments, especially the General Fund of cities, is the unusual cash flow experienced throughout the year. The City's General Fund cash disbursements are made fairly evenly during the year other than the impact of seasonal services such as snowplowing, street maintenance, and park activities. Cash receipts of the General Fund are quite a different story. Property taxes comprise about 78.7 percent of the fund's total annual revenue. Approximately half of these revenues are received by the City in July and the rest in December. Consequently,the City needs to have adequate cash reserves to finance its everyday operations between these payments. The City's unrestricted (assigned and unassigned) General Fund balance of$5,031,529 at the end of the 2016 fiscal year represented approximately 41.2 percent of budgeted expenditures and transfers out for 2017. This is within the City's policy that calls for maintaining an unrestricted fund balance of between 40.0-50.0 percent of the subsequent year's budgeted expenditures and transfers out. -9- The following chart reflects the City's General Fund revenue sources for 2016 compared to budget: General Fund Revenue Budget and Actual Property Taxes Intergovernmental Fines and Forfeits Charges for Services 163 Licenses and Permits N All Other 8J 8I `8I 8 8 4:3 '8`? `8v '8v '8.r '8s X86 86 4',.> '8 '8d 88 '8'9 '8'9 �o'0 .0 s�b' O�b s� °� s� °4� s�.0 r°o.o� 00 % % °o � % 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0° .00 .0° .0° .0° .00 .0° .0° .00 .0° .0° .00 .00 .00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •Actual ■Budget General Fund revenue for 2016 was $11,398,516, which was $628,662 (5.8 percent) more than budget. Property tax revenues were $106,458 over budget, mainly due to the excess tax increment distribution received that was not anticipated in the budget. Intergovernmental revenue exceeded budget by $134,290, as MSA street maintenance, fire pension and training aid, and police aid were all higher than projected. Charges for services exceeded budget by $86,205, mainly due to fire charges exceeding expectations. Revenue from licenses and permits were $282,608 more than budget, as building permits were higher than anticipated.Finally,revenue in the"all other"category was over budget by$42,351. The following graph presents the City's General Fund revenues by source for the last five years. The graph reflects the City's reliance on property taxes and other local sources of revenue: General Fund Revenue by Source Year Ended December 31, $10,000,000 $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 Property Fines and Charges for Licenses Taxes Intergovernmental Al!Other Forfeits Services and Permits 12012 $8,392,912 $510,841 $73,210 $567,595 $423,153 $194,159 ■2013 $8,269,785 $570,603 $81,919 _ $575,992 $664,673 $102,797 9 201 $8,173,509 $849,876 $65,482 $519,169 $514,728 $295,376 112015 $8,485,373 $905,130 $52,299 $507,555 _ $370,889 $187,987 12016 $8,973,628 $937,424 $41,750 $577,905 $650,311 $217,498 Total General Fund revenue for 2016 was $889,283 (8.5 percent) higher than last year. Property taxes were $488,255 higher than last year due to the increased tax levy and the excess tax increment distribution received.License and permit revenues increased$279,422 from last year due to an increase in building permits. Charges for service increased$70,350,mainly as a result of increased fire charges. -10- The following graphs illustrate the components of General Fund spending for 2016 compared to budget: General Fund Expenditures Budget and Actual General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks and Recreation All Other 0?o o� '�� 'off �� o� �� 'off sq� 'o% goo 00 '°0 '°0'000 '°0 '°0,000 '°0 '°0'000 '000 000 poo poo ■Actual ■Budget General Fund expenditures for 2016 were $10,490,919, which was $560,699 (5.1 percent) under budget. Expenditures were under budget due to milder weather, lower fuel prices, and conservative spending, with the largest savings in general government($134,486) and public works ($217,055). Expenditures in the "all other" category were under budget by ($118,822), mainly due to a difference between how the City's $120,000 interfund loan principal repayment was budgeted (as an expenditure) and how it is reflected in the financial statements(impacts the Balance Sheet only). The following graph presents the City's General Fund expenditures by function for the last five years: General Fund Expenditures by Function Year Ended December 31, $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 I ■ ■ ■ , General Public Safety Public Works Parks and All Other Government _ Recreation ■2012 $1,814,708 $4,752,006 $1,307,610 $1,150,996 $— •2013 — ■2013 $1,672,639 $5,511,231 $2,079,996 $1,204,319 $10,718 0 201 $1,717,186 $4,918,093 _ $2,038,136 $1,135,079 $48,583 ■2015 $1,946,663 $5,081,605 $1,977,495 $1,188,042 $96,343 ■2016 $1,996,410 $5,303,440 $1,941,856 $1,208,035 $41,178 Total General Fund expenditures for 2016 were$200,771 (2.0 percent)higher than the previous year.The largest increase was in public safety expenditures,which were$221,835 higher than last year. -11- ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW The City maintains several enterprise funds to account for services the City provides that are financed primarily through fees charged to those utilizing the service. This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's enterprise funds,which includes the Liquor Operations, Sewer Operations,Solid Waste, Storm Water,Water,and Street Light funds. ENTERPRISE FUNDS FINANCIAL POSITION The following table summarizes the changes in the financial position of the City's enterprise funds during the year ended December 31,2016,presented both by classification and by fund: Enterprise Funds Change in Financial Position Net Position as of December 31, Increase 2016 2015 (Decrease) Net position of enterprise funds Total by classification Net investment in capital assets $ 53,225,787 $ 54,807,938 $ (1,582,151) Restricted—future drinking water treatment plant 2,231,966 2,160,566 71,400 Unrestricted 12,575,526 11,439,369 1,136,157 Total—enterprise funds $ 68,033,279 $ 68,407,873 $ (374,594) Total by fund Liquor Operations $ 1,057,545 $ 956,725 $ 100,820 Sewer Operations 21,148,014 21,446,130 (298,116) Solid Waste 1,545,800 1,347,092 198,708 Storm Water 14,684,236 14,907,068 (222,832) Water 29,531,419 29,622,133 (90,714) Street Light 66,265 128,725 (62,460) Total—enterprise funds $ 68,033,279 $ 68,407,873 $ (374,594) In total, the net position of the City's enterprise funds decreased by $374,594 during the year ended December 31,2016. The City's net investment in capital assets decreased$1,582,151 during the year due to depreciation. Unrestricted net position increased by $1,136,157, as most of the City's enterprise operations had positive operating results prior to transfers out. The enterprise funds transferred a total of $1,428,106 to the governmental and internal service funds during the year to support the General Fund, help pay for capital improvements,and for debt service. -12- LIQUOR OPERATIONS FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the City's Liquor Operations Fund: Liquor Operations Fund Year Ended December 31, $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 17_1 ! $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ■Sales $4,397,572 $4,521,454 $4,639,194 $4,607,417 $4,742,313 ■Cost of Sales $3,294,182 $3,378,256 $3,467,797 $3,467,487 $3,537,858 0Oper Exp $821,848 $827,802 $848,037 $885,110 $911,074 ■Oper Inc(Loss) $281,542 $315,396 $323,360 $254,820 $293,381 The City's Liquor Operations Fund ended 2016 with an unrestricted net position of $1,057,545, an increase of$100,820 from the prior year. The Liquor Operations Fund had gross sales of$4,742,313 in 2016, an increase of$134,896(2.9 percent) from the previous year. Gross profit was $1,204,455, about 25.4 percent of sales,up from 24.7 percent in 2015. Operating expenses for 2016 increased of$25,964(2.9 percent)from the previous year,mainly in salaries and benefits related to the City's proportionate share of the state's underfunded pension plan obligations. -13- SEWER OPERATIONS FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the City's Sewer Operations Fund: Sewer Operations Fund Year Ended December 31, $2,250,000 $2,000,000 $1,750,000 — $1,500,000 — $1,250,000 — $1,000,000 — $750,000 — $500,000 — $250,000 — $(250,000) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 I IOperRev $1,787,957 $1,816,763 $1,843,746 $1,957,902 $2,043,859 MI=OperExp $1,876,273 $1,625,220 $1,710,843 $1,873,412 $2,049,273 -Inc Before Depr $501,687 $777,271 $723,105 $679,364 $591,786 -Oper Inc(Loss) $(88,316) $191,543 $132,903 $84,490 $(5,414) The Sewer Operations Fund ended 2016 with a total net position of$21,148,014, a decrease of$298,116 from the prior year due to charges for services not being sufficient to cover depreciation expense. Of this, $17,951,642 represents the investment in sewer collection system capital assets, leaving an unrestricted net position of$3,196,372. Operating revenue in the Sewer Operations Fund increased$85,957 (4.4 percent) from the prior year due to an increase in rates and more customers on the system. Operating expenses for 2016 were$175,861 (9.4 percent)higher than the previous year.The largest factor contributing to the change was an increase of approximately $170,000 in disposal fees paid to Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. -14- SOLID WASTE FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the City's Solid Waste Fund: Solid Waste Fund Year Ended December 31, $2,200,000 $2,000,000 $1,800,000 — $1,600,000 — $1,400,000 — $1,200,000 — $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 oOperRev $1,869,426 $1,952,177 $1,979,623 $1,991,179 $2,041,561 OperExp $1,727,384 $1,658,547 $1,600,434 $1,658,128 $1,775,162 Inc Before Depr $217,704 $347,133 $431,634 $385,496 $346,778 Oper Inc(Loss) $142,042 $293,630 $379,189 $333,051 $266,399 The Solid Waste Fund ended 2016 with a total net position of$1,545,800, an increase of$198,708 from the prior year. Of this, $327,801 represents the investment in solid waste operation capital assets, leaving an unrestricted net position of$1,217,999. Operating revenue in the Solid Waste Fund increased $50,382 (2.5 percent) from the prior year due to increases in both tonnage collected and the number of customers. Operating expenses for 2016 were$117,034 (7.1 percent)higher than the previous year, mainly due to an increase in tipping fees charged to the City for solid waste disposal. -15- STORM WATER FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the City's Storm Water Fund: Storm Water Fund Year Ended December 31, $750,000 $600,000 $450,000 — $300,000 — $150,000 — $(150,000) $(300,000) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 I=Oper Rev $475,060 $565,166 $559,327 $670,353 $643,479 Oper Exp $734,516 $513,582 $615,684 $731,444 $534,988 Oper Inc(Loss) $(259,456) $51,584 $(56,357) $(61,091) $108,491 Inc Before Depr $125,807 $435,826 $330,919 $339,516 $520,482 The Storm Water Fund ended 2016 with a total net position of$14,684,236, a decrease of$222,832 from the prior year due to charges for services not being sufficient to cover depreciation expense. Of this, $13,535,377 represents the investment in storm water operation capital assets, leaving an unrestricted net position of$1,148,859. Operating revenue in the Storm Water Fund decreased $26,874 (4.0 percent) from the prior year, mainly due to engineering fees collected in the prior year for miscellaneous projects with no similar revenue in the current year. Operating expenses for 2016 were $196,456 (26.9 percent) lower than the previous year. Most of the decrease was in purchased service costs related to the joint county/city 195th Street Reconstruction Project in the previous year. -16- WATER FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the City's Water Fund: Water Fund Year Ended December 31, $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $— $(200,000) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 elm OperRev $1,595,116 _ $1,558,400 $1,499,091 $1,439,873 $1,631,643 I IOperExp $1,704,790 $1,426,947 $1,409,961 $1,339,420 $1,359,111 -Inc Before Depr $773,424 $1,010,039 $968,433 $924,944 $1,042,252 -Oper Inc(Loss) $(109,674) $131,453 $89,130 $100,453 $272,532 The Water Fund ended 2016 with a total net position of$29,531,419,a decrease of$90,714 from the prior year due to charges for services not being sufficient to cover depreciation expense. Of this, $21,410,967 represents the investment in water distribution system capital assets, $2,231,966 is restricted for a future drinking water treatment plant,and unrestricted net position is$5,888,486. Operating revenue in the Water Fund for 2016 increased$191,770(13.3 percent) from the prior year due to an increase in consumption, as well as increases in water main trunk charges and water quality management fees related to the development of the City's new senior living facility, the Legacy of Farmington,in the current year. Water Fund operating expenses for 2016 were$19,691 (1.5 percent)higher than the previous year,mainly in purchased service costs related to water main maintenance. -17- STREET LIGHT FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the City's Street Light Fund: Street Light Fund Year Ended December 31, $300,000 $275,000 $250,000 $225,000 $200,000 — $175,000 — $150,000 — _ $125,000 — _ $100,000 — _ $75,000 — _ $50,000 — _ $25,000 — $(25,000) $(50,000) $(75,000) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 I I Oper Rev $215,029 $216,719 $219,052 $222,159 $224,781 OperExp $176,513 $184,834 $174,957 $173,212 $288,924 Oper Inc(Loss) $38,516 $31,885 $44,095 $48,947 $(64,143) Street Light Fund operating revenue for 2016 increased$2,622(1.2 percent)from the prior year. Operating expenses were$115,712 (66.8 percent)more than the previous year, due to the cost of the City beginning to convert to LED lights,as well as the TH-3 Traffic Signal Change Project. Unrestricted net position decreased$62,460 in 2016,ending the year at$66,265. -18- GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In addition to fund-based information,the current reporting model for governmental entities also requires the inclusion of two government-wide financial statements designed to present a clear picture of the City as a single, unified entity. These government-wide financial statements provide information on the total cost of delivering services, including capital assets and long-term liabilities. STATEMENT OF NET POSITION The Statement of Net Position essentially tells you what your city owns and owes at a given point in time, the last day of the fiscal year. Theoretically, net position represents the resources the City has leftover to use for providing services after its debts are settled.However,those resources are not always in spendable form, or there may be restrictions on how some of those resources can be used. Therefore, net position is divided into three components: net investment in capital assets,restricted,and unrestricted. The following table presents the components of the City's net position as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, for governmental activities and business-type activities: As of December 31, Increase 2016 2015 (Decrease) Net position Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets $ 23,684,773 $ 21,417,203 $ 2,267,570 Restricted 10,441,391 9,063,587 1,377,804 Unrestricted 5,142,435 8,920,144 (3,777,709) Total governmental activities 39,268,599 39,400,934 (132,335) Business-type activities Net investment in capital assets 53,225,787 54,807,938 (1,582,151) Restricted 2,231,966 2,160,566 71,400 Unrestricted 12,575,526 11,439,369 1,136,157 Total business-type activities 68,033,279 68,407,873 (374,594) Total net position $ 107,301,878 $ 107,808,807 $ (506,929) The City's total net position at December 31, 2016 was $506,929 lower than the previous year-end. The City's net position decreased $132,335 from current year governmental activities and $374,594 from current year business-type activities. The governmental activities net investment in capital assets increased $2.3 million and the unrestricted portion of governmental net position decreased $3.8 million in 2016, mainly due to the repayment of the outstanding debt used to acquire the City's related capital assets. The business-type activities net investment in capital assets decreased$1.6 million in 2016,mainly due to depreciation. The unrestricted portion of the business-type activities net position increased $1.1 million due to the operating results of the City's enterprise operations as previously discussed. -19- STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES The Statement of Activities tracks the City's yearly revenues and expenses, as well as any other transactions that increase or reduce total net positions. These amounts represent the full cost of providing services. The Statement of Activities provides a more comprehensive measure than just the amount of cash that changed hands, as reflected in the fund-based financial statements. This statement includes the cost of supplies used,depreciation of long-lived capital assets,and other accrual-based expenses. The following table presents the change in the net position of the City for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015: 2016 2015 Program Expenses Revenues Net Change Net Change Net(expense)revenue Governmental activities General government $ 2,268,779 $ 724,412 $ (1,544,367) $ (1,828,666) Public safety 6,979,608 923,790 (6,055,818) (4,594,415) Public works 5,497,796 1,185,900 (4,311,896) (6,612,682) Parks and recreation 1,904,792 704,914 (1,199,878) (1,210,888) Economic development 40,000 — (40,000) (90,000) Interest on long-term debt 1,032,748 — (1,032,748) (992,422) Business-type activities Liquor 4,448,932 4,742,313 293,381 254,820 Sewer 2,051,152 2,043,859 (7,293) 82,677 Solid waste 1,753,162 2,064,561 311,399 355,051 Storm water 534,988 643,479 108,491 884,847 Water 1,359,215 1,631,643 272,428 100,285 Street light 288,924 224,781 (64,143) 48,947 Total net(expense)revenue $ 28,160,096 $ 14,889,652 (13,270,444) (13,602,446) General revenues Property taxes 11,806,302 11,460,209 Franchise taxes 275,691 265,485 Unrestricted grants 287,252 278,974 Investment earnings 394,270 342,494 Total general revenues 12,763,515 12,347,162 Change in net position $ (506,929) $ (1,255,284) One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side-by-side comparison to illustrate the difference in the way the City's governmental and business-type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the dependence of the City's governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and unrestricted grants. It also shows that, for the most part, the City's business-type activities are generating sufficient program revenues (service charges and program-specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the current downward pressures on the general revenue sources. The difference in the year-to-year net change in the public safety function was mainly due to an increase in the City's proportionate share of the state-wide Public Employees Retirement Association pension plans. The difference in the year-to-year net change in the public works function resulted primarily from a higher level of uncapitalized street maintenance expense in 2015 attributable to the county's reconstruction of 195th Street. -20- LEGISLATIVE UPDATES The 2016 legislative session, falling in the second half of the state's fiscal biennium,was scheduled to be a short session lasting only 11 weeks. Since biennial budgets are adopted in odd-year legislative sessions, less time is usually needed for the even-year sessions. However, because the 2015 Legislature adjourned without passing funding bills in several significant areas, it was anticipated that the 2016 legislative session would be considerably more active than the typical short session. In spite of this, only a few funding bills were brought forth to the Governor .by the end of the 2016 regular legislative session, including a supplemental budget bill and an omnibus tax bill. The Governor chose not to sign the tax bill due to a drafting error that would have resulted in an unintended reduction of state revenues. When the framework for a special session could not be agreed upon,the fiscal year ended without the adoption of a new tax bill,capital bonding bill, or transportation funding package. The following is a summary of recent legislation affecting Minnesota cities: Border-to-Border Broadband Grants — The 2016 supplemental budget act appropriated $35 million in fiscal 2017 for a Border-to-Border Broadband Grant Program. The grants, available through the Office of Broadband Development in the Department of Employment and Economic Development(DEED), provide funding to help communities meet state goals for the development of state-wide high-speed broadband access, focusing on areas currently considered to be underserved or with a high concentration of low-income households. Equity-Related Programs and Grants — The 2016 supplemental budget act also appropriated $35 million in fiscal 2017 for the financing of equity-related programs through DEED,the majority of which was allocated for programs and grants for communities of color, people with disabilities, seniors,and youth. Sales Tax Exemption—Effective January 1, 2017,the sales tax exemption on the purchase of goods or services enacted for cities in 2014 is expanded to include all special districts; city, county, or township instrumentalities; economic development authorities; housing and redevelopment authorities; and all joint power boards or organizations. Taxes Covered Under Debt Management Services — Amendments were made to the statutes governing debt management and debt settlement services to clarify the status of delinquent taxes owed to Minnesota local governments and political subdivisions as debt with regard to those services, and include those entities as creditors for the purpose of debt management services. Elections—An omnibus elections law was passed making several changes to elections administration requirements. In addition to establishing a presidential primary to take the place of the current caucus system beginning in 2020, the law modified election procedures in a number of areas, including: absentee balloting, voting station dimensions, election canvassing, candidate filing, the extension of polling hours to accommodate voters in line at closing,and emergency election plans. Police-Worn Body Cameras — A number of new laws were enacted related to portable recording systems (police-worn body cameras) and the data derived from their use, addressing: data retention and destruction, permitted uses of the systems, audits of the data, and vendor practices. Among the changes are a requirement for gathering public input before purchasing or implementing the use of portable recording systems, and requirements for the adoption and dissemination of written policies over the use of portable recording systems. Veteran Preference Act—New language was added to state statutes clarifying that Minnesota cities and towns may require a veteran to complete an initial probationary period when hired. -21- Charitable Gambling — Cities that require charitable gambling organizations to contribute 10 percent of their net profits to the city for charitable purposes are now required to acknowledge the source of the funds,either in communications about the receipt or distribution of the funds. Donation of Surplus Equipment— Local governments are now permitted to donate surplus public works equipment, cell phones, or emergency medical and firefighting equipment to nonprofit organizations. The donation of surplus equipment was added to the list of exceptions to municipal tort liability.Prior to making any such donations, a city must adopt a policy on how it will determine what equipment is considered surplus and eligible for donation and how it will determine which nonprofit organizations will receive such donations. The policy must address the city's obligation to disclose that the donated equipment may be defective and cannot be relied upon for safety. Temporary Family Health Care Housing Permits — A new special land use permit system was established for a specific type of mobile health care-related mobile housing, intended to provide transitional housing for seniors. Cities will be required to implement the new permit system unless they officially act to opt out of the program. The program sets forth requirements for structure and placement,the permit process and duration,applicants, inspections,and the process for opting out. Partition Fence Viewing Exemption—Cities now have the authority to pass a resolution to exempt adjoining owners or occupants from the partition fence law when their land is considered to be less than 20 acres combined,thereby relieving the city of the responsibility of participating in a potentially costly "fence-viewing" process to mediate disputes between adjoining landowners required to share the costs of constructing fences. -22- ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING UPDATES GASB STATEMENT No.73,ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS AND RELATED ASSETS THAT ARE NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF GASB STATEMENT 68,AND AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF GASB STATEMENTS 67 AND 68 This statement extends the approach to accounting and financial reporting established in GASB Statement No. 68 to all pensions, including those not administered through a trust. Governmental employers participating in such plans will be required to report the total of any unfunded pension liability related to the plan in their accrual basis financial statements, rather than the net pension liability. The requirements of this statement that address accounting and financial reporting by employers and governmental nonemployer contributing entities for pensions not within the scope of GASB Statement No. 68, are effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15,2016. This statement also clarified the application of certain provisions of GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 regarding 10-year schedules of required supplementary information (RSI) and other recognition issues pertaining to employers and nonemployer contributing entities effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15,2015. GASB STATEMENT No.74,FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS OTHER THAN PENSION PLANS This statement establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for other post-employment benefits (OPEB) plans, replacing GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 57. It also includes requirements for defined contribution OPEB plans that replace the requirements for those OPEB plans in GASB Statement Nos. 25,43, and 50. This statement will improve financial reporting primarily through enhanced note disclosures and schedules of RSI that will be presented by OPEB plans administered through trusts meeting the specified criteria. The new information will enhance the decision-usefulness of the financial reports of those OPEB plans, their value for assessing accountability, and their transparency by providing information about measures of net OPEB liabilities and explanations of how and why those liabilities changed from year-to-year. The net OPEB liability information, including ratios, will offer an up-to-date indication of the extent to which the total OPEB liability is covered by the fiduciary net position of the OPEB plan. The comparability of the reported information for similar types of OPEB plans will be improved by the changes related to the attribution method used to determine the total OPEB liability. The contribution schedule will provide measures to evaluate decisions related to the assessment of contribution rates in comparison with actuarially determined rates, if such rates are determined. In addition, new information about rates of return on OPEB plan investments will inform financial report users about the effects of market conditions on the OPEB plan's assets over time and provide information for users to assess the relative success of the OPEB plan's investment strategy and the relative contribution that investment earnings provide to the OPEB plan's ability to pay benefits to plan members when they come due. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016. Earlier application is encouraged. -23- GASB STATEMENT NO.75,ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS GASB Statement No. 75,Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for governments whose employees are provided with OPEB, as well as for certain nonemployer governments that have a legal obligation to provide financial support for OPEB provided to the employees of other entities. This statement replaces the requirements of GASB Statement Nos.45 and 57. This statement establishes standards for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, and expense/expenditures. Similar to changes implemented for pensions, this statement requires the liability of employers and nonemployer contributing entities to employees for defined benefit OPEB (net OPEB liability) to be measured as the portion of the present value of projected benefit payments to be provided to current active and inactive employees that is attributed to those employees' past periods of service(total OPEB liability), Less the amount of the OPEB plan's fiduciary net position.Note disclosure and RSI requirements about defined benefit OPEB also are addressed. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2017. Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT NO.80,BLENDING REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN COMPONENT UNITS AN AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENT NO. 14 The objective of this statement is to clarify the financial statement presentation requirements for certain component units. This statement amends the blending requirements for the financial statement presentation of component units of all state and local governments. The additional criterion requires blending of a component unit incorporated as a not-for-profit corporation in which the primary government is the sole corporate member. The additional criterion does not apply to component units included in the financial reporting entity pursuant to the provisions of GASB Statement No. 39, Determining Whether Certain Organizations Are Component Units—an amendment of GASB Statement No. 14. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016. Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT NO.81,IRREVOCABLE SPLIT-INTEREST AGREEMENTS This statement provides recognition and measurement guidance for the accounting and financial reporting of irrevocable split-interest agreements by governments that are the beneficiary of such an agreement. Split-interest agreements are a type of giving agreement used by donors to provide resources to two or more beneficiaries, including governments. This statement requires that a government that receives resources pursuant to an irrevocable split-interest agreement (1) recognize assets, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at the inception of the agreement,(2)recognize assets representing its beneficial interests in irrevocable split-interest agreements that are administered by a third party if the government controls the present service capacity of the beneficial interests, and (3) recognize revenue when the resources become applicable to the reporting period. The requirements of this statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15,2016, and should be applied retroactively. Earlier application is encouraged. -24- GASB STATEMENT NO.82,PENSION ISSUES-AN AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENTS NO. 67, NO. 68,AND NO. 73 The intent of this statement is to address certain issues raised with respect to GASB Statement Nos.67, 68,and 73. This statement amends GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68, changing the definition of"covered payroll" utilized in schedules of RSI from the payroll of employees that are provided with pensions through the pension plan, to the payroll on which contributions to a pension plan are based. It clarifies that a deviation, as the term is used in Actuarial Standards of Practice, is not considered to be in conformity with the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 67, 68, or 73 for the selection of assumptions used in determining the total pension liability and related measures. It also clarifies that payments made by an employer to satisfy contribution requirements that are identified by the pension plan terms as plan member contribution requirements should be classified as plan member contributions for purposes of Statement No. 67 and as employee contributions for purposes of Statement No. 68, and requires that an employer's expense and expenditures for those amounts be recognized in the period for which the contribution is assessed and classified in the same manner as the employer classifies similar compensation other than pensions. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016, except for the requirements of this statement for the selection of assumptions in a circumstance in which an employer's pension liability is measured as of a date other than the employer's most recent fiscal year-end. In that circumstance, the requirements for the selection of assumptions are effective for that employer in the first reporting period in which the measurement date of the pension liability is on or after June 15,2017.Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT NO.83,CERTAIN ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS This statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain asset retirement obligations (ARO),which are legally enforceable liabilities associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset. This statement establishes criteria for determining the timing and pattern of recognition of a liability and a corresponding deferred outflow of resources for ARO.A government that has legal obligations to perform future asset retirement activities related to its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability when it is both incurred and reasonably estimable. The measurement of an ARO is required to be based on the best estimate of the current value of outlays expected to be incurred, and a deferred outflow of resources associated with an ARO is required to be measured at the amount of the corresponding liability upon initial measurement. This statement requires the current value of a government's AROs to be adjusted for the effects of general inflation or deflation at least annually, and a government to evaluate all relevant factors at least annually to determine whether the effects of one or more of the factors are expected to significantly change the estimated asset retirement outlays. A government should remeasure an ARO only when the result of the evaluation indicates there is a significant change in the estimated outlays. Deferred outflows of resources should be reduced and recognized as outflows of resources in a systematic and rational manner over the estimated useful life of the tangible capital asset. If a government owns a minority interest in a jointly owned tangible asset where a nongovernmental entity is the majority owner or has operational responsibility for the jointly owned asset,the government's minority share of an ARO should be reported using the measurement produced by the nongovernmental majority owner or the nongovernmental minority owner that has operational responsibility, without adjustment to conform to the liability measurement and recognition requirements of this statement. -25- The statement also requires disclosures of any funding or financial assurance requirements a government has related to the performance of asset retirement activities, along with any assets restricted for the payment of the government's AROs. This statement also requires disclosure of information about the nature of a government's AROs,the methods and assumptions used for the estimates of the liabilities, and the estimated remaining useful life of the associated tangible capital assets. If an ARO (or portions thereof) has been incurred by a government but is not yet recognized because it is not reasonably estimable, the government is required to disclose that fact and the reasons therefor. This statement requires similar disclosures for a government's minority shares of AROs. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2018. Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT NO.84,FIDUCIARY ACTIVITIES This statement establishes criteria for identifying fiduciary activities of all state and local governments. The focus of the criteria generally is on(1)whether a government is controlling the assets of the fiduciary activity and(2)the beneficiaries with whom a fiduciary relationship exists. Separate criteria are included to identify fiduciary component units and postemployment benefit arrangements that are fiduciary activities. An activity meeting the criteria should be reported in a fiduciary fund in the basic financial statements, which should present a statement of fiduciary net position and a statement of changes in fiduciary net position. This statement describes four fiduciary funds that should be reported, if applicable: (1) pension (and other employee benefit) trust funds, (2) investment trust funds, (3) private-purpose trust funds, and (4)custodial funds. Custodial funds generally should report fiduciary activities that are not held in a trust or equivalent arrangement that meets specific criteria. A fiduciary component unit, when reported in the fiduciary fund financial statements of a primary government, should combine its information with its component units that are fiduciary component units and aggregate that combined information with the primary government's fiduciary funds. This statement also provides for recognition of a liability to the beneficiaries in a fiduciary fund when an event has occurred that compels the government to disburse fiduciary resources, defined as when a demand for the resources has been made or when no further action, approval, or condition is required to be taken or met by the beneficiary to release the assets. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Earlier application is encouraged. -26- CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports Year Ended December 31,2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports Year Ended December 31,2016 Table of Contents Page Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards 1-2 Independent Auditor's Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance 3 Schedule of Findings and Responses 4 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PRINCIPALS Thomas A.Karnowski,CPA t LRPaul A.Radosevich,CPA William J.Lauer,CPA James H.Eichten,CPA CERTIFIED PUBLIC Aaron J.Nielsen,CPA ACCOUNTANTS Victoria L.Holinka,CPA/CMA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To the City Council and Management City of Farmington,Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Farmington, Minnesota(the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated May 8,2017. INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements,we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the City's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and,therefore,material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified. We did identify a deficiency in internal control, described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Responses as item 2016-001, that we consider to be a material weakness. (continued) -1- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements,noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. CITY'S RESPONSE TO FINDING The City's response to the finding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Responses. The City's response was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and,accordingly,we express no opinion on it. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. 146 a , l��wuou�.o,/�i �, sd�,,�,, Co., A A . 4r Minneapolis,Minnesota May 8,2017 -2- PRINCIPAIS Thomas A.Karnowski,CPA Paul A.Radosevich,CPA William J.Lauer,CPA James H.Eichten,CPA CERTIFIED LM IcR PUBLIC Aaron J.Nielsen,CPA ACCOUNTANTS Victoria L.Holinka,CPA/CMA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE To the City Council and Management City of Farmington,Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Farmington, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements,and have issued our report thereon dated May 8,2017. MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions,and tax increment financing. Our audit considered all of the listed categories. In connection with our audit,nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City's noncompliance with the above referenced provisions. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. 116111/ Wad.=r km.4.44044.AAA., ee•a P. • Minneapolis,Minnesota May 8,2017 -3- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com CITY OF FARMINGTON Schedule of Findings and Responses Year Ended December 31,2016 MATERIAL WEAKNESS IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING 2016-001 INADEQUATE SEGREGATION OF DUTIES Criteria—Internal control over financial reporting. Condition — The City of Farmington, Minnesota (the City) has inadequate segregation of duties in a number of areas, including,but not limited to,controls over payroll. Context—This is a current year and prior year finding. Cause — The inadequate segregation of duties is primarily caused by the limited size of the City's Finance Department staff. Effect—One important element of internal accounting controls is an adequate segregation of duties such that no one individual has responsibility to execute a transaction, have physical access to the related assets, and have responsibility or authority to record the transaction. A lack of segregation of duties subjects the City to a higher risk that errors or fraud could occur and not be detected in a timely manner in the normal course of business. Recommendation — We recommend that the City continue to review its accounting procedures and internal controls to segregate accounting functions wherever it is considered practical and cost-beneficial. Management Response—There is no disagreement with the audit finding. The City reviews and makes improvements to its internal control structure on an ongoing basis to maximize the segregation of duties in all areas within the limits of the staff available. However, the City does not consider it cost-beneficial at this time to increase the size of its Finance Department staff in order to further segregate accounting functions. -4- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report AK- R, x k Net Ar Photo by Jason Jensen City Of Farmington, Minnesota Year Ended December 31, 2016 David McKnight - City Administrator Prepared by: Finance Department CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Year Ended December 31,2016 David McKnight City Administrator Report Prepared by Finance Department Member of Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF FARMINGTON Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal i—vi GFOA Certificate of Achievement vii Organizational Chart viii Elected Officials and Executive Staff ix FINANCIAL SECTION INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT 1-3 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 4-15 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Government-Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 16 Statement of Activities 17-18 Fund Financial Statements Governmental Funds Balance Sheet 19-20 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position 21 Statement of Revenues,Expenditures,and Changes in Fund Balances 22-23 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues,Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances to the Statement of Activities 24 Statement of Revenues,Expenditures,and Changes in Fund Balances— Budget and Actual—General Fund 25 Proprietary Funds Statement of Net Position 26-27 Statement of Revenues,Expenses,and Changes in Fund Net Position 28-29 Statement of Cash Flows 30-31 Fiduciary Fund Statement of Net Position 32 Notes to Basic Financial Statements 33-64 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION PERA—General Employees Retirement Fund Schedule of City's and Non-Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability 65 Schedule of City Contributions 65 PERA—Public Employees Police and Fire Fund Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability 66 Schedule of City Contributions 66 Farmington Fire Fighters' Relief Association Schedule of Changes in the Relief Association's Net Pension Liability(Asset) and Related Ratios 67 Schedule of City Contributions 68 City of Farmington Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan Schedule of Funding Progress 69 CITY OF FARMINGTON Table of Contents(continued) Page SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules Nonmajor Governmental Funds 70 Combining Balance Sheet 71 Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 72 Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds 73 Combining Balance Sheet 74 Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 75 Nonmaj or Capital Projects Funds 76 Combining Balance Sheet 77-78 Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenditures,and Changes in Fund Balances 79-80 Debt Service Fund 81 Combining Balance Sheet by Account 82-83 Combining Schedule of Revenues,Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances by Account 84-85 Budgetary Comparison Schedules 86 Debt Service Fund 87 State Aid Construction Capital Projects Fund 88 Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects Fund 89 Permanent Improvement Revolving Capital Projects Fund 90 Maintenance Capital Projects Fund 91 Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Police Donations and Forfeitures 92 Park Improvement 93 Arena 94 Nonmaj or Capital Projects Funds Sanitary Sewer Trunk 95 Cable Communications 96 Fire 97 Private 98 Recreation 99 General Capital Equipment 100 Internal Service Funds 101 Combining Statement of Net Position 102 Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenses,and Changes in Fund Net Position 103 Combining Statement of Cash Flows 104 Fiduciary Fund 105 Agency Fund Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities 106 Discretely Presented Component Unit—EDA 107 Combining Balance Sheet 108 Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenditures,and Changes in Fund Balances 109 CITY OF FARMINGTON Table of Contents(continued) Page STATISTICAL SECTION(UNAUDITED) STATISTICAL TABLES 110 Net Position by Component 111-112 Changes in Net Position 113-116 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 117-118 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 119-120 Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property 121-122 Property Tax Rates 123 Principal Property Taxpayers 124 Property Tax Levies and Collections 125 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 126-127 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 128-129 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 130 Legal Debt Margin Information 131-132 Pledged Revenue Coverage 133 Demographic and Economic Statistics 134 Principal Employers 135 Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function 136-137 Operating Indicators by Function 138-139 Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program 140-141 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK INTRODUCTORY SECTION 1,Lfutzt,o City of Farmington 430 Third Street % WI Farmington,Minnesota 651.280.6800•Fax 651.280.6899 ••4 POO www.ci.farmington.mn.us May 8, 2017 Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and Citizens of the City of Farmington, Minnesota The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of the City of Farmington, Minnesota (the City) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 is hereby submitted. This report was prepared by the Finance Department and responsibility for both the accuracy of the presented data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, supporting schedules and statistical tables rests with the City. To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations, management of the City has established a comprehensive internal control framework that is designed to protect the City's assets from loss,theft or misuse, and to compile sufficient reliable information for the preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because the cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits,the City's internal controls have been designed to provide reasonable, rather than the absolute assurance,that the financial statements will be free from material misstatements. As management, we assert that to the best of our knowledge and belief, this CAFR is complete and reliable in all material respects;that it is presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the financial position and results of operations of the City as measured by the financial activity of its various funds; and that all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain the maximum understanding of the City's financial affairs have been included. The organization, form and contents of this report were prepared in accordance with the standards prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) of the United States and Canada, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Minnesota's Office of the State Auditor,and City policies. The City's financial statements have been audited by Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A., a professional firm of certified public accountants. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements of the City for the year ended December 31, 2016, are free of material misstatement. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. The independent auditor concluded, based upon the audit, that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an unmodified opinion that the City's financial statements, for the year ended December 31, 2016, are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Independent Auditor's Report is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report. This transmittal letter is designed to complement the management's discussion and analysis (MD&A) and should be read in conjunction with it. The MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the independent auditors. -i- Profile of the Government The City is a suburban community located 30 miles south and east of downtown Minneapolis in Dakota County and was established in 1872 as a railroad center for the surrounding farming community. The City has seen a 7 percent growth in population over the past 10 years due to an influx of new housing. The 2010 Census established the City's population at 21,086. Additionally, the City's boundary has grown easterly, adding 1,407 acres of annexation and growing from 12.5 square miles in 2000 to its current size of 14.82 square miles. The growth that the City has experienced is due to a number of factors, such as relatively affordable home ownership as compared to homes north and west of Farmington, the opportunity to locate further from the inner core, and the opportunity to live in a community with a "home-town"feel because of its discernable traditional downtown. The City operates under the mayor-council form of organization.The governing City Council, consists of the mayor and four other councilmembers, is elected at large and on a non-partisan basis. Terms of office are staggered four-year terms, with elections held in each even-numbered year. The City Council is responsible for, among other things, passing ordinances,adopting the budget, appointing members to the various committees and commissions, and hiring the city administrator, heads of various departments, and city employees. The city administrator is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the Council, for overseeing the day-to-day operations of the City's government, and the heads of various departments and city employees. The City provides its residents and businesses a full range of municipal services, including police and fire protection, ambulance services, construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and other infrastructure, as well as recreational and cultural activities. The City operates the following enterprise funds: municipal liquor operations, sewer, solid waste, storm water, water and street lights. The City also contributes to the senior center operations, outdoor municipal pool, ice arena, limited community recreation services,and several other important community-based events and projects. Economic Condition The information presented in the financial statements is perhaps best understood when it is considered from the broader perspective of the specific environment within which the City operates. Local Economy Major industries,located within the City's boundaries include the Independent School District (ISD) No. 192, Federal Aviation Administration, an electric utility cooperative, an assisted living facility, an independent living senior facility, a transportation company, a trucking company, and manufacturers of dairy products and flag and light poles. ISD No. 192 and the Federal Aviation Administration provide a significant economic presence providing employment to approximately 900 and 600 people, respectively. During 2016, several local businesses undertook major building improvement renovations. ISD No. 192 completed several building maintenance projects. A new senior assisted living building began construction, a local catering business expanded its business and several new businesses were started during the year, including a new family restaurant.The City continues to partner with Dakota County to offer the Open to Business initiative, which provides financial and business advice to small and future business owners. New residential construction was steady in the City. In 2016, the City issued new construction permits for 65 single-family residences with a total valuation of $13,734,000, a duplex building valued at $225,500, and a multi-family building valued at $9,256,000. The number of foreclosures in the City continued to decline.There were 36 foreclosures in the City in 2016,this is down from 123 as recently as 2012. -ii- Long-Term Planning The City Council meets each year to review changes that have taken place in the City and identify a set of priorities for the next 1-2 years. In June 2016, the City Council established four priorities for 2016/2017,which include: • Financial.—Continue to take steps to make the City a city of fiscal excellence. • Development—Support the expansion of residential, commercial, and industrial properties. • Partnerships—Forge opportunities with existing and new partners. • Service Delivery—Endeavor to provide core government services at high quality levels. These priorities are intentionally broad, high level goals that the City Council believes will make the City an even stronger community. During the year, the city administrator formally updates the City Council on staff's progress. From a financial perspective, during 2016,the City refinanced a portion of its debt to achieve interest savings and reduce the term of its bond repayments, finished the year with positive financial results that served to continue to strengthen the fund balance in the General Fund, and donated over $100,000 of liquor store profits to projects benefitting the community. Meanwhile, staff continues to work with the City Council to review and update the City's 2030 financial management plan. During 2016, staff continued to review and revise various capital improvement plans (CIP), including CIP's for streets, trails, and equipment. Planning is underway for the design, build, and purchase of the City's next new fire engine in 2019.The next large-scale road project is scheduled for 2019. Updating the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan will be the focus of 2017. Additional information about these strategies and goals may be found on the City's website,www.ci.farmington.mn.us. Relevant Financial Policies Operating Budgets The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City's financial planning control. All departments of the City submit budget requests for the following year to the city administrator in the spring/summer of each year. These requests serve as a starting point for the development of a proposed budget. These requests are then presented to the City Council for review in the summer. The City Council adopts a preliminary tax levy by September 30. The City Council is required to hold hearings and obtain input on the proposed budget and to adopt a final budget and property tax levy no later than December 28 of the close of the fiscal year. The budget of the City is prepared by fund (e.g., General Fund), function, (e.g., public safety), and department (i.e., police department). Departments may request transfers of appropriations within line items in the department; however, City Council approval is required when making transfers between funds. Budget to actual comparisons are provided in this report for the General Fund, special revenue funds, capital project funds, and debt service funds (in total). The General Fund budget to actual comparison is on page 25. The remaining budget-to-actual comparisons are presented starting on page 86. -iii- Revenue Policies The City conservatively projects its annual revenues after a thorough analytical process which involves annually reexamining existing and potential revenues sources. Cash Management Policy and Practice The City's Investment Policy was reviewed and updated in 2013. The primary goal of the City's investment policy is to ensure the safety of the principal invested. Idle cash during the year was invested according to the City's Investment Policy. The City continued to experience investing in a low interest rate environment, but saw its overall investment portfolio increase during 2016. As a result, the City's 2016 investment earnings were comparable to 2015. Staff monitors interest rates and continues the diligent practice of reviewing the City's cash flow needs to determine how best to invest available funds, including potentially retiring some debt early. While short-term interest rates remained low in 2016,they were somewhat higher than 2015. In addition,the City's average investment balances were higher than the previous year and the average maturity was longer resulting in higher investment earnings than the previous year. Continued low short-term interest rates and higher average investment balances were factored into the City's 2017 budget. The recent increase in short-term rates will be considered as the 2018 budget is developed. Debt Management Policy and Practice The City Council reviewed and adopted an updated Debt Management Policy in 2013. The purpose of the policy is to establish parameters and provide guidance governing the issuance, management, continuing evaluation of and reporting on all debt obligations of the City. During the year, the City currently refunded four series of bonds to realize future interest savings and reduce the bond repayment term for three of the four series refunded. The City also internally refinanced two other smaller bond issues. Staff continues to review its outstanding debt issues and advise the City Council which bonds, if any,it would make financial or program sense to refund and/or restructure. Fund Balance Policy and Practice The City's financial strength has improved significantly over the past five years. During 2016, for the third year in a row,the City's General Fund cash flow was positive each calendar month during the year. No interfund borrowing was required. Further evidence of the General Fund's improved financial strength can be seen in the General Fund's unassigned fund balance which increased from 20.8 percent of the subsequent years' budgeted expenditures and transfers out as of December 31, 2011 to 41.2 percent as of December 31, 2016. This increase has been accomplished through sound budgeting, long-term financial planning, higher than anticipated building permit revenues, lower fuel prices, mild winters and conservative spending by staff. In April 2015, the City adopted an updated fund balance policy, effective as of December 31, 2014.This policy acknowledges the progress the City has made in strengthening its General Fund balance and challenged the City to continue to improve by increasing the minimum General Fund balance. The updated policy states the City will strive to maintain the fund balance in the General Fund between 40-50 percent of the subsequent years' budgeted expenditures and transfers out in order to provide enough funding to carry city operations to the next semiannual receipt of tax proceeds (in June/July). The City Council and staff have worked diligently to strengthen the City's financial position and as of December 31, 2015, reached and have since maintained the minimum recommended fund balance level set forth in this policy. -iv- Major Initiatives The City continues to place a high priority on planning for the community's needs as growth and expansion issues impact city operations.The availability of land, infrastructure, and services continue to drive the community development focus of the City. A community that helps grow value has a positive impact on the net worth of all its property owners.As an organization,the City has worked diligently to build a variety of services,facilities, infrastructure,and secure a financial foundation for its residents and stakeholders. Maintaining high quality services plays a key role in favorable appreciation of the community's property values. The City's substantial investments in its infrastructure have helped extend the life of some existing roadways and improve the quality and safety of other roads in the City. Investments in homes and businesses represent the most important assets in an American citizen's personal portfolio; therefore, the continued enhancement of that value is extremely important. The City is seeing its average residential house values continue to increase. The City needs to continue to progress forward by building and renewing its community.The community and organizational strength, both financial and operational, allows the City to create even greater opportunities.The City Council placed the goal of assisting and encouraging economic development as a high priority; during 2014, the City hired a community development director. City ordinances continue to be reviewed and updated to provide for new business opportunities. A new housing 70-unit senior assisted living development was approved and construction started in 2016. The development plans to open in August 2017. A local catering business is expanding their operations.The City Council approved the preliminary plat, conditional use permit, and business subsidy agreement for a Midwest regional grocery store chain in the Vermillion River Crossings Development.The final Alternative Urban Areawide Review and Mitigation Plan update were approved by the City Council for a new single-family housing development, the first phase of which is expected to begin in 2017. The City completed its Downtown Redevelopment Plan in 2016 and implementation has started, including a Downtown Facade Improvement Grant Program. The recommendation to provide a downtown community plaza is being further explored in 2017. The City Council further strengthened the organization by hiring its first full-time fire chief in April 2015. Since then the fire department has implemented large-scale capital improvement plans for vehicles and equipment, crafted strategic planning and mission development,and expanded the number of volunteer firefighters to 60 members. Farmington Municipal Liquor Operations have made tremendous improvements over the past five years. With new management in 2012, an emphasis was placed on improving store operations, expectations, and profits. Store profits benefit the community and over the past four years,the stores have produced an average of just over$215,000 per year in profits. Notably,the liquor stores have been able to provide over$1.1 million since 2005 to city departments and community organizations. The City continues to collaborate with Dakota County, Dakota County Regional Chamber, the Farmington Business Association, ISD No. 192, nearby communities, and neighboring townships to provide its citizens with various services. Awards The GFOA awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City for its CAFR for the year ended December 31, 2015. This is the seventh year the City has received this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a city must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR. This report must satisfy both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current CAFR continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements and are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. -v- Acknowledgments The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the talented and dedicated services of the entire staff of the Finance Department and other key city personnel. We would like to express our appreciation to all city staff for their attention to detail and budget management throughout the year. Credit also must be given to the Mayor and the City Council for their support and the steps they have taken to continue to strengthen the City's finances and longer-term financial planning. Respectively Submitted, otstok: f ' ....V) 1. David McKnight,City Adm trator 1/04: ‘,01.4.....44........ Robin Hanson, Finance Director -vi- r ■■ ■� r � Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Farmington Minnesota For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015 *Cr dete• Executive Director/CEO L -vii- , CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA Organizational Chart December 31, 2016 Citizens City Council •City Administrator Administration Finance Human Resources Police Fire Liquor Operations Information Technology Community Development Engineering Parks and Recreation Municipal Services I 1 Building Inspections Planning and Solid Waste Division Zoning Division -Viii- CITY OF FARMINGTON Elected Officials and Executive Staff December 31,2016 ELECTED OFFICIALS Term Expires Todd Larson Mayor December 31,2016 Jason Bartholomay Councilmember December 31,2018 Doug Bonar Councilmember December 31,2016 Terry Donnelly Councilmember December 31,2016 Tim Pitcher Councilmember March 9,2017* EXECUTIVE STAFF David McKnight City Administrator Adam Kienberger Community Development Director Vacant Engineer Robin Hanson Finance Director Jim Larsen Fire Chief Brenda Wendlandt Human Resources Director Todd Reiten Municipal Services Director Randy Distad Parks and Recreation Director Brian Lindquist Police Chief *City Council appointed Katie Bernhjelm effective April 17,2017 through December 31,2018. -ix- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FINANCIAL SECTION PRINCIPALS Thomas A.Karnowski,CPA Paul A.Radosevich,CPA William J.Lauer,CPA James H.Eichten,CPA CERTIFIED PUBLIC Aaron J.Nielsen,CPA ACCOUNTANTS Victoria L.Holinka,CPA/CMA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the City Council and Management City of Farmington,Minnesota REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Farmington, Minnesota(the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements,whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments,the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management,as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. (continued) -1- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com OPINIONS In our opinion, the financial statements referred to on the previous page present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2016, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof, and the budgetary comparison for the General Fund for the year then ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. OTHER MATTERS Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management's discussion and analysis and the required supplementary information (RSI), as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Government Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries,the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. The introductory section, supplemental information, and statistical section, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not required parts of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the supplemental information is fairly stated,in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. (continued) -2- OTHER REPORTING REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS In accordance with Government Auditing Standards,we have also issued our report dated May 8,2017 on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. i a , ll'l , K /�..C .�G. o., P. A . Minneapolis,Minnesota May 8,2017 -3- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF FARMINGTON Management's Discussion and Analysis Year Ended December 31,2016 As management of the City of Farmington, Minnesota(the City), we offer readers of the City's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The discussion and analysis is intended to be considered in conjunction with the additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, located earlier in this report, and the City's financial statements contained within this report. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS • The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by $107,301,878 (net position) at the close of the most recent fiscal year. Of this amount, $17,717,961 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the government's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. • The City's total net position decreased by $506,929 in 2016, of this amount $132,335, or 26.1 percent, was attributable to governmental activities, and $374,594, or 73.9 percent, was attributable to business-type activities. • The City's total bonded debt increased by $5,208,466, or 16.8 percent, during the fiscal year due to a combination of the issuance of$9,620,000 of general obligation refunding bonds and annual bond principal payments. • The City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $27,183,379 at December 31, 2016, an increase of$8,636,912 from the prior year. Approximately 37.5 percent of this total amount,$10,190,357,is available for use within the City's constraints and policies. • At the end of the current fiscal year, the unassigned fund balance for the General Fund was $5,031,529,or 41.2 percent,of 2017 General Fund budgeted expenditures and transfers out. OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City's basic financial statements.The City's basic financial statements are comprised of three components: 1)government-wide financial statements, 2)fund financial statements, and 3)notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. Government-Wide Financial Statements — The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City's finances, in a manner similar to a private sector business. -4- These financial statements include not only the City itself(known as the primary government), but also the Farmington Economic Development Authority (EDA). The EDA has been presented as a discretely presented component unit on the City's financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Statement of Net Position presents information on all of the City's assets, liabilities, and deferred inflows/outflows, as applicable, with the difference reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating. The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the City's net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs,regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g.,uncollected taxes and earned,but unused personal leave time). Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business-type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public safety, public works, parks and recreation, and economic development. The business-type activities of the City include liquor operations, and sewer, solid waste,storm water,water,and street light utility operations. Fund Financial Statements —A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives.The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds. Governmental Funds — Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on the near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near-term financing requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government's near-term financing decisions. Both the governmental funds Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The City maintains several individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental funds Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances for the City's six individual major governmental funds.They are as follows: • General Fund • Debt Service Fund • State Aid Construction Capital Projects Fund • Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects Fund • Permanent Improvement Revolving Capital Projects Fund • Maintenance Capital Projects Fund -5- Data from the other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these nonmajor governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The City adopts annual appropriated budgets for its General Fund, special revenue funds, Debt Service Fund (combined), and capital projects funds. Budgetary comparison statements or schedules have been provided for these funds to demonstrate compliance with their respective budgets. Proprietary Funds—The City maintains six enterprise funds and four internal service funds as a part of its proprietary fund type. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-typeactivities in the governmental-wide financial statements. The City uses enterprise funds to account for its liquor operations, and its sewer, solid waste, storm water, water, and street light utility operations. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for the enterprise funds, all of which are considered to be major funds of the City. Internal service funds are an accounting device used to accumulate and allocate costs internally among the City's various functions. The City uses internal service funds to account for its employee benefits, property and liability insurance, maintaining its fleet of vehicles, and information technology needs. All internal service funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation in the proprietary fund financial statements, labeled Governmental Activities — Internal Service Funds. Because all of these services predominately benefit governmental, rather than business-type functions, they have been included within governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. Individual fund data for the internal service funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. Fiduciary Funds — Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government-wide financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the City's own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for proprietary funds. Notes to Basic Financial Statements — The notes to basic financial statements provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. Other Information—In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes,the financial section also presents required supplementary information, and the combining and individual fund statements and schedules (presented as supplementary information) referred to earlier in connection with nonmajor governmental funds and internal service funds, which are presented immediately following the basic financial statements. Furthermore, a statistical section has been included as part of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR)to facilitate additional analysis,and is the third and final section of the report. -6- GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS An analysis of the City's financial position begins with a review of the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities. These two statements report the City's net position and changes in net position. It should be noted that the financial position can also be affected by non-financial factors, including economic conditions,population growth,and new regulations. As noted earlier,net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of the City's financial position. As presented in the following condensed version of the Statement of Net Position, the City's assets and deferred outflows of resources exceeded liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by $107,301,878 at December 31,2016. City of Farmington's Net Position Governmental Activities _ Business-Type Activities Total 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 Current and other assets $ 36,411,195 $ 25,813,806 $ 16,090,233 $ 14,605,450 $ 52,501,428 $ 40,419,256 Capital assets 51,098,418 52,781,709 53,225,787 54,807,938 104,324,205 107,589,647 Total assets $ 87,509,613 $ 78,595,515 $ 69,316,020 $ 69,413,388 $ 156,825,633 $ 148,008,903 Deferred outflows of resources $ 9,293,019 $ 1,387,254 $ 317,468 $ 70,620 $ 9,610,487 $ 1,457,874 Current liabilities $ 20,255,477 $ 6,295,828 $ 625,465 $ 400,576 $ 20,880,942 $ 6,696,404 Long-term liabilities 35,391,748 33,349,311 865,054 616,255 36,256,802 33,965,566 Total liabilities $ 55,647,225 $ 39,645,139 $ 1,490,519 $ 1,016,831 $ 57,137,744 $ 40,661,970 Deferred inflows of resources $ 1,886,808 $ 936,696 $ 109,690 $ 59,304 $ 1,996,498 $ 996,000 Net position Net investment in capital assets $ 23,684,773 $ 21,417,203 $ 53,225,787 $ 54,807,938 $ 76,910,560 $ 76,225,141 Restricted 10,441,391 9,063,587 2,231,966 2,160,566 12,673,357 11,224,153 Unrestricted 5,142,435 8,920,144 12,575,526 11,439,369 17,717,961 20,359,513 Total net position $ 39,268,599 $ 39,400,934 $ 68,033,279 $ 68,407,873 $ 107,301,878 $ 107,808,807 The largest portion of the City's net position, $76,910,560, or 72 percent,reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g., land, buildings, machinery and equipment); less any outstanding related debt used to acquire those assets. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending.Although the City's investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. Restricted net position of$12,673,357 comprises 12 percent of net position at the close of the fiscal year ended December 31,2016. These assets are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The balance of unrestricted net position, $17,717,961, or approximately 16 percent, may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. Certain balances within unrestricted net position may have internally imposed commitments or limitations, which may further limit the purpose for which such net position may be used. -7- CHANGES IN NET POSITION The following table provides a condensed version of the Statement of Activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 with comparative totals for the year ended December 31, 2015. The City's net position decreased by$506,929,or 0.5 percent,during the current fiscal year. City of Farmington's Change in Net Position Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total 2016 2015 2016• 2015 2016 2015 Revenues Charges for services $ 1,975,741 $ 1,363,826 $ 11,327,636 $ 10,888,883 $ 13,303,377 $ 12,252,709 Operating grants and contributions 744,730 649,541 23,000 22,000 767,730 671,541 Capital grants and contributions 818,545 671,671 - 945,938 818,545 1,617,609 Property taxes 11,806,302 11,460,209 - - 11,806,302 11,460,209 Other taxes 275,691 265,485 - - 275,691 265,485 Unrestricted grants 287,252 278,974 - - 287,252 278,974 Investment earnings 255,021 189,540 139,249 152,954 394,270 342,494 Total revenues 16,163,282 14,879,246 11,489,885 12,009,775 27,653,167 26,889,021 Expenses General government 2,268,779 2,284,974 - - 2,268,779 2,284,974 Public safety 6,979,608 5,357,738 - - 6,979,608 5,357,738 Public works 5,497,796 7,473,095 - - 5,497,796 7,473,095 Parks and recreation 1,904,792 1,815,882 - 1,904,792 1,815,882 Economic development 40,000 90,000 - 40,000 90,000 Interest on long-term debt 1,032,748 992,422 - - 1,032,748 992,422 Liquor - - 4,448,932 4,352,597 4,448,932 4,352,597 Sewer - - 2,051,152 1,875,225 2,051,152 1,875,225 Solid waste - - 1,753,162 1,658,128 1,753,162 1,658,128 Storm water - - 534,988 731,444 534,988 731,444 Water - - 1,359,215 1,339,588 1,359,215 1,339,588 Street light - - 288,924 173,212 288,924 173,212 Total expenses 17,723,723 18,014,111 10,436,373 10,130,194 28,160,096 28,144,305 Change in net position before transfers (1,560,441) (3,134,865) 1,053,512 1,879,581 (506,929) (1,255,284) Transfers 1,428,106 1,222,807 (1,428,106) (1,222,807) - - Changein net position (132,335) (1,912,058) (374,594) 656,774 (506,929) (1,255,284) Net position-beginning 39,400,934 41,312,992 68,407,873 67,751,099 107,808,807 109,064,091 Net position-ending $ 39,268,599 $ 39,400,934 $ 68,033,279 $ 68,407,873 $ 107,301,878 $ 107,808,807 Governmental Activities-Governmental activities decreased the City's net position before transfers by $1,560,441,primarily due to costs incurred related to the county's 195th Street Reconstruction Project. Business-Type Activities-Business-type activities increased the City's net position before transfers by $1,053,512, due to profitable operations in all but the Street Light Fund, where additional costs were incurred in 2016 for conversion to LED lights and the TH-3 Traffic Signal Change Project. -8- GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES Revenues—The following chart illustrates the City's revenues by source for its governmental activities: Revenues by Source—Governmental Activities Capital Grants and Unrestricted Wants Contributions 2% Other 5%_\ 1% Operating Grants and Contributions Charges for 5% Services 12% Other Taxes 2% • •.- Taxes 73% Expenses —The following chart illustrates the City's governmental expenses and corresponding program revenues, excluding transfers,for its governmental activities: Expenses and Program Revenues—Governmental Activities $7,500,000 - $7,000,000 - $6,500,000 - $6,000,000 - $5,500,000 - $5,000,000 - $4,500,000 - $4,000,000 - $3,500,000 - $3,000,000 - $2,500,000 - $2,000,000 - $1,500,000 - $1,000,0001.111 - $500,000 . $500,000 - 5-- General Parks and Economic Merest on Government Public Safety Public Works Recreation Development Long-Terni Debt ■Program Revenues $724,412 _ $923,790 $1,185,900 $704,914 $— $— •Expenses $2,268,779 $6,979,608 $5,497,796 $1,904,792 $40,000 $1,032,748 -9- BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES Revenues—The following chart illustrates the City's revenues by source for its business-type activities: Revenues by Source—Business-Type Activities meting Grants and Other Contributions 1% <1% \_Charges for Services 99% Expenses—Below is a graph showing the City's program revenues and expenses, excluding transfers, for its business-type activities: Expenses and Program Revenues—Business-Type Activities $5,000,000 - $4,500,000 - $4,000,000 - $3,500,000 - $3,000,000 - $2,500,000 - $2,000,000 - $1,500,000 - $1,000,000 11 - $500,000 $- Liquor Fund Sewer Solid Waste Storm Water Water Fund Street Light Operations ▪Program Revenues $4,742,313 $2,043,859 $2,064,561 $643,479 $1,631,643 $224,781 ■Expenses $4,448,932 $2,051,152 $1,753,162 $534,988 $1,359,215 $288,924 -10- FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S FUNDS As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. Governmental Funds — The focus of the City's governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of currently available resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City's financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. As of the end of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $27,183,379, a 46.6 percent increase of $8,636,912 from 2015. Much of the increase is attributed to the issuance of$9,620,000 in general obligation refunding bonds. The proceeds from these bonds will be used to call the outstanding principal of prior bond issuances on February 1, 2017. Meanwhile, the City's General Fund benefited from increased permit revenue coupled with lower fuel costs due to lower fuel prices, lower utility and snow removal costs due to a mild winter,and conservative spending by staff. The Debt Service Fund's fund balance increased due to the bond issuances noted above, increased transfers in as part of the City's long-term debt management plan, and property tax, special assessment, and investment earnings that were more than needed to pay the corresponding principal and interest due on the bonds. Committed and unassigned fund balances, which are available for spending at the government's discretion, had a balance of $10,190,357 at year-end. The remainder of the fund balance is either nonspendable ($33,872), or restricted to indicate that it is not available for new spending because it has already been obligated 1)to pay debt service($16,663,140),2)to pay for capital improvements and future cable communication expenditures ($141,058), 3) for park improvements ($140,616), and 4) the remainder is from donations and other restricted funds($14,336). Financial highlights for the City's major governmental funds are as follows: General Fund —The General Fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of 2016, the unassigned fund balance of the General Fund was $5,031,529. As a measure of the General Fund's liquidity, it may be useful to compare the fund balance to total fund expenditures. The 2016 unassigned fund balance represents 41.2 percent of total 2017 General Fund budgeted expenditures and transfers out, up from 40.1 percent for the December 31, 2015 unassigned fund balance as a percentage of the 2016 General Fund budgeted expenditures and transfers out. The reasons for the increase are due to higher than budgeted permit revenue,lower than budgeted fuel(lower fuel prices), snow removal and utility costs (mild winter), and conservative spending by the various departments. As a result,the General Fund realized an overall increase in fund balance and the City saw the overall percentage of unassigned fund balance as a percentage of General Fund expenditures and transfers out increase. The General Fund's unassigned fund balance has increased from 20.8 percent as of December 31, 2011 to 41.2 percent as of December 31, 2016. The City Council has increased its commitment to not only sound, comprehensive budgets, but also long-term financial planning. In addition, the City has benefitted from an improving economy and a couple of mild winters (lower utility and snow removal costs). Together these efforts have resulted in the strengthening of the General Fund's balance. The City Council also recently revised the City's fund balance policy and stated it would strive to maintain the fund balance in the General Fund between 40-50 percent of the subsequent year's budgeted expenditures and transfers out in order to provide enough funding to carry city operations to the next semiannual receipt of tax proceeds (in June/July). As of December 31, 2016, the City's General Fund balance meets the minimum fund balance guideline. -11- Debt Service Fund—During the year, the City issued $9.62 million in refunding bonds and repaid $4.4 million in principal. The fund balance in the Debt Service Fund increased $11.2 million, primarily due to the issuance of new bonds, increased transfers in as part of the City's long-term debt management plan, and property tax, special assessment, and investment earnings that were more than needed to pay the corresponding principal and interest due on most bonds. State Aid Construction Capital Projects Fund—The first priority for this fund's fund balance is to provide for future debt service payments, as needed, for certain bonds in the Debt Service Fund. During 2016, the amount transferred to the related bond funds in the Debt Service Fund exceeded the property tax levy, special assessments, and intergovernmental revenues,resulting in a net decrease of $1,334,482 in this fund's balance. The funds transferred were primarily used in conjunction with the issuance of the 2016A refunding bonds to lower the City's future interest costs and reduce the , refunding bonds repayment period. Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects Fund—The decrease of$1,085,513 in fund balance is due to the City investing available fund balance to optionally redeem the remaining 2005C G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds on February 1, 2016. To reduce future interest costs, avoid incurring costs of issuance, and provide the City with more repayment flexibility, the City also utilized funds from the Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects Fund to optionally redeem two bond issues, fund a small portion of another refunding bond issue, and pay the county for a portion of the costs related to a recent county improvement project. The interfund advances will be repaid with interest through a combination of future tax levies,project prepayments,and state aid construction reimbursements. Permanent Improvement Revolving Capital Projects Fund— There were no new projects in this fund during 2016. There was a modest increase in the fund balance of$15,624 as special assessments received exceeded expenditures. Maintenance Capital Projects Fund—There was a decrease of$832,348 as the street project costs incurred in 2016 exceeded state aid construction revenues received during the current year. An interfund advance was provided by the Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects Fund to pay for a portion of the joint county/city 195th Street reconstruction project. This advance will be repaid with state aid construction reimbursement dollars received over the next several years. Financial highlights for the significant changes in the City's nonmajor governmental funds are as follows: Cable Communications Capital Projects Fund — During 2016, franchise tax revenues exceeded operational costs,resulting in a net increase in fund balance of$101,384. Fire Capital Projects Fund — In 2013, the City adopted a long-term capital equipment plan for its fire department. The increase in fund balance of$112,190 is a combination of planned transfers in for equipment replacement and donations from the Farmington Fire Fighters' Relief Association exceeding the current year's equipment expenditures. General Capital Equipment Capital Projects Fund—The increase in fund balance of$123,496 is a result of planned transfers into this fund to address police vehicle and equipment needs, as well as general city vehicle replacements. Proprietary Funds — The City's proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government-wide financial statements, but in more detail. Financial highlights for the significant changes in the City's proprietary funds are as follows: Liquor Operations Fund — Each year the City reviews the financial performance of its liquor operations. After setting aside a certain amount of funds for operations and administrative transfers, the remaining funds on hand are allocated to community investment and future capital improvements. -12- During 2016, the City's liquor stores' community investment fund dollars were used to purchase the following: thermal imaging cameras, a new sound system and ice resurfacer for the ice arena, a new mobile security camera, bike racks for downtown, and the completion of a local trail extension. The net position of the Liquor Operations Fund at the end of 2016 totaled $1,057,545, an increase of $100,820, which is net of the$109,073 in funds contributed to community projects noted above. The cash position for both stores has continued to strengthen, increasing from a combined total of $900,732 at December 31,2015 to$1,006,456 as of December 31,2016. Sewer Operations Fund—The decrease in net position of$298,116 is primarily due to charges for services not being sufficient to cover depreciation expense. The City began to address the structural pricing deficit by implementing a rate increase, which went into effect January 1, 2016 and is designed to provide sufficient funds over time, along with other planned future rate increases, to cover both operations and depreciation. This fund continues to maintain a significant unrestricted net position of$3,196,372. Solid Waste Fund—The Solid Waste Fund recorded an increase in net position of$198,708. While recording an increase in net position, this fund is experiencing increased costs related to increased disposal fees and quantities being disposed. To offset some of these cost increases in 2016, changes were made to the annual curbside clean-up program to reduce costs. Storm Water Fund—The decrease in net position of$222,832 is primarily due to budgeted transfers made in 2016. This fund continues to maintain an unrestricted net position of$1,148,859. Water Fund—The 2016 decrease in net position of$90,714 is primarily due to charges for services not being sufficient to cover depreciation expense. In conjunction with a long-term financial analysis of this fund performed in 2014, which does take into consideration the long-term need to cover depreciation expense, a fee increase went into effect in January 2015. Over time, this increase, along with other planned fee increases, is designed to cover depreciation. This fund continues to maintain a significant unrestricted net position of$5,888,486. Street Light Fund—The Street Light Fund was established in 2010. By making this a utility fund,all properties, including tax-exempt properties, within the City pay for street lighting. During 2016, a portion of the accumulated fund balance paid for the first phase of a project to convert some of the City's streetlights to LED lights and to replace a streetlight in conjunction with a local state highway construction project. After its fifth year of operation, this fund has achieved a modest positive net position of$66,265. GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS The City's original and final budgets are the same,as no budget amendments were made during the year. Actual revenues were $628,662 more than budgeted. Revenue variances from final budget to actual include: • Licenses and permits revenue was $282,608 more than budgeted, primarily due to higher than anticipated residential building permit activity. In addition to residential permits for new construction, there were several commercial rehabilitation projects and a significant permit for the construction of a new senior housing development in 2016 that were not included in the budget. • Intergovernmental revenue came in over budget by $134,290 due to higher than anticipated state aid for fire aid and county aid for a downtown redevelopment study. -13- • Charges for services were $86,205 higher than budgeted as a result of increased reimbursement from one of the neighboring townships for fire protection services and an increase in non-contract fire charges(e.g.,illegal,hazardous fires). • Investment earnings revenues were more than budgeted, primarily due to an overall increase in the funds available for investment in the General Fund and the increase in market value of the City's General Fund investments. Expenditures were $560,699 less than the budgeted amount. The City benefitted from lower human resource costs partially attributable to staff vacancies, lower fuel costs due to lower fuel prices, and lower utility and snow removal costs associated with the milder winter. Almost all areas of expenditures were under budget due to conservative spending and use of city resources by all staff. CAPITAL ASSETS AND LONG-TERM DEBT Capital Assets—The City's investment in capital assets for its governmental and business-type activities as of December 31, 2016 was $104,324,205 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets includes land, buildings, improvements other than buildings, park facilities, machinery and equipment, vehicles, roads, bridges, infrastructure, intangibles, water mains, water reservoirs, sewer mains, lift stations, and storm water mains. The City's investment in capital assets for the current fiscal year decreased by 3.0 percent due to depreciation. City of Farmington's Capital Assets Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 Land and easement $ 1,749,824 $ 1,749,824 $ 414,576 $ 414,576 $ 2,164,400 $ 2,164,400 Buildings 15,728,401 16,168,676 137,227 229,214 15,865,628 16,397,890 Improvements other than buildings 396,932 480,119 — — 396,932 480,119 Machinery and equipment 1,423,668 1,289,643 448,514 292,878 1,872,182 1,582,521 Infrastructure 31,799,593 33,093,447 — — 31,799,593 33,093,447 Collection and distribution system — — 52,225,470 53,871,270 52,225,470 53,871,270 Total(net of depreciation) $ 51,098,418 $ 52,781,709 $ 53,225,787 $ 54,807,938 $ 104,324,205 $ 107,589,647 Additional information on the City's capital assets can be found in Note 4 of the notes to basic financial statements. Long-Term Debt—At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded debt outstanding of $36,295,000. All city debt is general obligation debt, which is backed by the full faith and credit of the government. Furthermore, the City has long-term liabilities of$738,645 for unamortized bond premiums, $948,003 for compensated absences, $14,485,684 for net pension liabilities, and $885,475 for other post-employment benefits. -14- City of Farmington's Outstanding Debt Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 General obligation improvement bonds $ 19,930,000 $ 18,375,000 $ — $ — $ 19,930,000 $ 18,375,000 Capital improvement bonds 13,105,000 8,860,000 — — 13,105,000 8,860,000 Public Project Revenue Bond 2,085,000 2,395,000 — — 2,085,000 2,395,000 Revenue bonds 640,000 796,534 — — 640,000 796,534 Certificates of indebtedness 535,000 660,000 — — 535,000 660,000 Total bonds outstanding $ 36,295,000 $ 31,086,534 $ — $ — $ 36,295,000 $ 31,086,534 Refunding bonds totaling$9,620,000 were issued in 2016 to redeem, in advance of their stated maturities, several previous bond issues on their February 1, 2017 optional redemption dates. Bond principal repayments during 2016 totaled $4,411,534. The City's credit rating from Standard & Poor's was raised from"AA-"to "AA"in September 2015. Minnesota Statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue to 3 percent of total estimated market value. The current debt limitation for the City is $48,043,247, which is significantly more than the City's outstanding general obligation debt. Additional information on the City's long-term debt may be found in Note 6 of the notes to basic financial statements. ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR'S BUDGETS AND RATES The City increased its net operating levy in 2017 by$383,568. The final city net operating levy for 2017 is $9,996,822 and is 3.99 percent higher than the comparable 2016 levy. Of the total budgeted revenues, including transfers in for 2017, 75.00 percent are from property taxes, including $2.1 million in fiscal disparities revenue. The remaining General Fund budgeted revenues were adjusted to better reflect projected building activity and intergovernmental-related revenues. Proposed 2017 General Fund expenditures, including transfers out, are estimated at $12,203,490, an increase of 2.4 percent compared to the 2016 budget. The 2017 budget maintains funding for core services—police and fire protection, street maintenance and snow removal, parks and recreation, and administration; provides for a new network support staff position and funds positions which were added during 2016; and continues long-term funding for the City's seal coating, trail maintenance, building maintenance, and police and fire equipment.Longer term,the City's financial plan provides for a new fire engine and the next large scale street improvement project in 2019. For 2017, one of the City's biggest challenges is the reduction in the number of lots available for new residential homes. During 2016,the Alternative Urban Areawide Review(AUAR)was updated for a new residential development. Plans for the first phase are expected to be received in 2017. Meanwhile, a new 70-unit senior assisted living facility with memory care is scheduled to open late summer 2017. For 2017,user charges have been increased in the Water Fund. REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION This CAFR is designed to provide a general overview of the City's finances for all those with an interest in the government's finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this CAFR or requests for additional financial information should be directed to the City's Finance Director at the City of Farmington, 430 Third Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024; by calling (651) 280-6800; or emailing the request to rhanson@ci.farmington.mn.us. -15- BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF FARMINGTON Statement of Net Position as of December 31,2016 Primary Government Component Unit Economic Governmental Business-Type Development Activities Activities Total Authority Assets Cash and investments $ 20,291,150 $ 11,454,038 $ 31,745,188 $ 330,975 Receivables Accounts 625,649 1,419,391 2,045,040 9,789 Interest 65,433 29,876 95,309 723 Property taxes 1,320,254 - 1,320,254 - Special assessments 3,794,516 352,020 4,146,536 - Due from other governments 20,046 - 20,046 - Inventory - 469,893 469,893 - Prepaid items 50,588 133,049 183,637 - Restricted assets-temporarily restricted Cash for future drinking water treatment plant - 2,231,966 2,231,966 - Cash and investments for debt service 9,620,000 - 9,620,000 Net pension asset-fire relief 623,559 - 623,559 - Capital assets Not depreciated 1,749,824 414,576 2,164,400 - Depreciated,net of accumulated depreciation 49,348,594 52,811,211 102,159,805 - Total capital assets,net of accumulated depreciation 51,098,418 53,225,787 104,324,205 - Total assets 87,509,613 69,316,020 156,825,633 341,487 Deferred outflows of resources Pension plan deferments-PERA 8,727,818 317,468 9,045,286 - Pension plan deferments-fire relief 565,201 - 565,201 - Total deferred outflows of resources 9,293,019 317,468 9,610,487 - Total assets and deferred outflows of resources $ 96,802,632 $ 69,633,488 $ 166,436,120 $ 341,487 Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ 2,146,145 $ 470,090 $ 2,616,235 $ 2,096 Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable 315,934 - 315,934 - Accrued interest payable 376,502 - 376,502 - Deposits payable 374,419 33,010 407,429 - Due to other governments 346 68,491 68,837 - Long-tem liabilities Due within one year 17,042,131 53,874 17,096,005 - Due in more than one year 35,391,748 865,054 36,256,802 - Total long-term liabilities 52,433,879 918,928 53,352,807 - Total liabilities 55,647,225 1,490,519 57,137,744 2,096 Deferred inflows of resources Pension plan deferments-PERA 1,745,298 109,690 1,854,988 - Pension plan deferments-fire relief 141,510 - 141,510 - Total deferred inflows of resources 1,886,808 109,690 1,996,498 - Net position Net investment in capital assets 23,684,773 53,225,787 76,910,560 - Restricted for Debt service 9,097,858 - 9,097,858 - Capital projects 141,058 - 141,058 - Police programs 14,336 - 14,336 - Park improvements 140,889 - 140,889 - Fire relief pensions 1,047,250 - 1,047,250 - Water Fund-future drinking water treatment plant - 2,231,966 2,231,966 - Unrestricted 5,142,435 12,575,526 17,717,961 339,391 Total net position 39,268,599 68,033,279 107,301,878 339,391 Total liabilities,deferred inflows of resources,and net position $ 96,802,632 $ 69,633,488 $ 166,436,120 $ 341,487 See notes to basic financial statements -16- CITY OF FARMINGTON Statement of Activities Year Ended December 31,2016 Program Revenues Operating Capital Charges for Grants and Grants and Functions/Programs Expenses Services Contributions Contributions Primary government Governmental activities General government $ 2,268,779 $ 668,849 $ 55,563 $ — Public safety 6,979,608 459,240 409,806 54,744 Public works 5,497,796 195,716 226,410 763,774 Parks and recreation 1,904,792 651,936 52,951 27 Economic development 40,000 — — — Interest and fiscal charges 1,032,748 — — — Total governmental activities 17,723,723 1,975,741 744,730 818,545 Business-type activities Liquor operations 4,448,932 4,742,313 — — Sewer operations 2,051,152 2,043,859 — — Solid waste 1,753,162 2,041,561 23,000 — Storm water 534,988 643,479 — — Water 1,359,215 1,631,643 — — Street light 288,924 224,781 — — Total business-type activities 10,436,373 11,327,636 23,000 — Total primary government $ 28,160,096 $ 13,303,377 $ 767,730 $ 818,545 Component unit Economic development authority $ 184,538 $ — $ 81,500 $ — General revenues Property taxes Franchise taxes Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs Investment earnings Transfers Total general revenues and transfers Change in net position Net position—beginning Net position—ending See notes to basic financial statements -17- Net(Expense)Revenue and Changes in Net Position Primary Government Component Unit Economic Governmental Business-Type Development Activities Activities Total Authority $ (1,544,367) $ — $ (1,544,367) $ — (6,055,818) — (6,055,818) — (4,311,896) — (4,311,896) — (1,199,878) — (1,199,878) — (40,000) — (40,000) — (1,032,748) — (1,032,748) — (14,184,707) — (14,184,707) — — 293,381 293,381 - - (7,293) (7,293) - - 311,399 311,399 - - 108,491 108,491 — 272,428 272,428 — (64,143) (64,143) - - 914,263 914,263 — (14,184,707) 914,263 (13,270,444) — — — — (103,038) 11,806,302 — 11,806,302 55,421 275,691 — 275,691 — 287,252 — 287,252 — 255,021 139,249 394,270 4,142 1,428,106 (1,428,106) — — 14,052,372 (1,288,857) 12,763,515 59,563 (132,335) (374,594) (506,929) (43,475) 39,400,934 68,407,873 107,808,807 382,866 $ 39,268,599 $ 68,033,279 $ 107,301,878 $ 339,391 -18- CITY OF FARMINGTON Balance Sheet Governmental Funds as of December 31,2016 Capital Projects— Debt Service State Aid General Fund Construction Assets Cash and investments $ 3,875,294 $ 17,439,538 $ 393,228 Receivables Accounts 241,134 — — Interest 10,017 33,456 3,310 Property taxes Unremitted 1,178,179 — — Delinquent 142,075 — — Special assessments Delinquent — 3,432 1,808 Noncurrent — 2,427,788 254,039 Due from other funds 127 — — Advances to other funds — — — Due from other governments 19,939 — — Prepaid items 33,762 — — Total assets $ 5,500,527 $ 19,904,214 $ 652,385 Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ 237,354 $ — $ — Deposits payable 55,630 — — Due to other governments 177 — — Due to other funds — 133,000 — Advances from other funds — 676,854 — Total liabilities 293,161 809,854 — Deferred inflows of resources Unavailable revenue—accounts receivable — — — Unavailable revenue—property taxes 142,075 — — Unavailable revenue—special assessments — 2,431,220 255,847 Total deferred inflows of resources 142,075 2,431,220 255,847 Fund balances Nonspendable 33,762 — — Restricted — 16,663,140 — Committed — — 396,538 Assigned — — — Unassigned 5,031,529 — — Total fund balances 5,065,291 16,663,140 396,538 Total liabilities,deferred inflows of resources,and fund balances $ 5,500,527 $ 19,904,214 $ 652,385 See notes to basic financial statements -19- Capital Capital Projects- Projects- Permanent Capital Storm Water Improvement Projects- Trunk Revolving Maintenance Nonmajor Total $ 553,469 $ 150,853 $ 3,029,064 $ 2,336,509 $ 27,777,955 - 162,940 178,711 582,785 5,676 330 3,664 5,093 61,546 - - - 1,178,179 - - - 142,075 238 751 - - 6,229 2,302 1,102,953 - 1,205 3,788,287 236,500 - - - 236,627 1,808,245 - - - 1,808,245 - - - - 19,939 - - 110 33,872 $ 2,606,430 $ 1,254,887 $ 3,195,668 $ 2,521,628 $ 35,635,739 $ - $ - $ 1,824,395 $ 34,983 $ 2,096,732 - - 318,190 373,820 - - - 169 346 127 - 103,500 - 236,627 - - 1,131,391 - 1,808,245 127 - 3,059,286 353,342 4,515,770 - - - - 142,075 2,540 1,103,703 - 1,205 3,794,515 2,540 1,103,703 - 1,205 3,936,590 - - - 110 33,872 - - - 296,010 16,959,150 2,603,763 151,184 136,382 1,870,961 5,158,828 - - - - 5,031,529 2,603,763 151,184 136,382 2,167,081 27,183,379 $ 2,606,430 $ 1,254,887 $ 3,195,668 $ 2,521,628 $ 35,635,739 -20- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF FARMINGTON Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position Governmental Funds as of December 31,2016 Total fund balances—governmental funds $ 27,183,379 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and,therefore,are not reported in governmental funds. Cost of capital assets 88,300,777 Less accumulated depreciation (37,202,359) Net pension assets are only recorded in the government-wide financial statements as they are not current financial resources to governmental funds. 623,559 Long-term liabilities are not payable with current financial resources and,therefore, are not reported in governmental funds. Bonds and certificates of indebtedness (36,295,000) Unamortized bond premiums (738,645) Compensated absences (857,104) Net pension liability (13,728,296) Net OPEB obligation (795,765) Interest on long-term debt is included in the change in net position as it accrues, regardless of when payment is due.However,it is included in the change in fund balances when due. (376,502) Internal service funds are used by management to charge certain costs to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds are included in governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position. 1,811,754 Due to availability, certain revenues are not recognized under the governmental fund statements until received; however, under full accrual in the government-wide Statement of Activities, revenues are recorded when earned regardless of when received. Delinquent property taxes 142,075 Delinquent and deferred special assessments 3,794,515 Governmental funds do not report certain long-term amounts related to pensions that are included in net position. Deferred outflows—pension plan deferments 9,293,019 Deferred inflows—pension plan deferments (1,886,808) Total net position—governmental activities $ 39,268,599 See notes to basic financial statements -21- CITY OF FARMINGTON Statement of Revenues,Expenditures,and Changes in Fund Balances Governmental Funds Year Ended December 31,2016 Capital Projects— Debt Service State Aid General Fund Construction Revenues Property taxes $ 8,973,628 $ 2,752,122 $ 117,000 Franchise taxes 100,000 — — Special assessments — 494,099 21,024 Licenses and permits 650,311 — — Intergovernmental 937,424 200,000 — Charges for services 577,905 — — Fines and forfeits 41,750 — — Investment earnings 41,969 71,668 18,688 Other 75,529 — — Total revenues 11,398,516 3,517,889 156,712 Expenditures Current General government 1,996,410 — — Public safety 5,270,662 — — Public works 1,941,856 — — Parks and recreation 1,190,177 — — Economic development 40,000 — — Capital outlay General government — — — Public safety 32,778 — — Public works — — 194 Parks and recreation 17,858 — — Debt service Principal — 4,411,534 — Interest and fiscal charges 1,178 1,094,202 — Total expenditures 10,490,919 5,505,736 194 Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures 907,597 (1,987,847) 156,518 Other financing sources(uses) Sale of capital assets — — — Transfers in 1,150,183 3,050,379 — Transfers out (1,737,307) (1,812) (1,491,000) Refunding bonds issued — 9,620,000 — Premiums on bonds issued — 500,095 — Total other financing sources(uses) (587,124) 13,168,662 (1,491,000) Net change in fund balances 320,473 11,180,815 (1,334,482) Fund balances Beginning of year 4,744,818 5,482,325 1,731,020 End of year $ 5,065,291 $ 16,663,140 $ 396,538 See notes to basic financial statements -22- Capital Capital Projects- Projects- Permanent Capital Storm Water Improvement Projects- Trunk Revolving Maintenance Nonmajor Total $ - $ - $ 9,817 $ - $ 11,852,567 - - - 175,691 275,691 14,318 14,309 - 2,027 545,777 - - - - 650,311 445,964 50,000 1,633,388 82,261 - - 417,694 1,077,860 - - 41,750 59,189 1,680 18,312 25,718 237,224 - - 2,521 182,514 260,564 155,768 15,989 476,614 853,644 16,575,132 1,996,410 - - - 30,549 5,301,211 - - 64,750 2,006,606 323,234 1,513,411 40,000 - - - 82,488 82,488 - - - 371,331 404,109 163 365 1,956,889 22,096 1,979,707 - - 22,343 249,275 289,476 - - - - 4,411,534 - - - _ - 1,095,380 163 365 1,979,232 1,143,723 19,120,332 155,605 15,624 (1,502,618) (290,079) (2,545,200) - 13,043 13,043 - - 680,270 709,379 5,590,211 (1,241,118) - (10,000) (60,000) (4,541,237) - - - - 9,620,000 - - - - 500,095 (1,241,118) - 670,270 662,422 11,182,112 (1,085,513) 15,624 (832,348) 372,343 8,636,912 3,689,276 135,560 968,730 1,794,738 18,546,467 $ 2,603,763 $ 151,184 $ 136,382 $ 2,167,081 $ 27,183,379 -23- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF FARMINGTON Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues,Expenditures,and Changes in Fund Balances to the Statement of Activities Governmental Funds Year Ended December 31,2016 Total net change in fund balances—governmental funds $ 8,636,912 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because: Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities,the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. Capital outlay 469,122 Depreciation expense (2,087,497) A gain or loss on the disposal of capital assets, including the difference between the carrying value and any related sale proceeds, is included in the change in net position. However,only the sale proceeds are included in the change in fund balances. (64,916) Net pension assets are included in net position, but are excluded from fund balances because they do not represent financial resources. (38,142) The issuance of long-term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds,while the repayment of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds.Neither transaction,however, has any effect on net position. Other long-term adjustments are also made between the governmental funds and the Statement of Activities for debt premiums,compensated absences,pension liabilities,and OPEB obligations. Bonds issued (9,620,000) Principal payments for bonds and certificate of indebtedness 4,411,534 Debt premiums (460,673) Compensated absences (104,351) Net pension liability (8,232,408) Net OPEB obligation (87,811) Interest on long-term debt in the Statement of Activities differs from the amount reported in the governmental funds because interest is recognized as an expenditure in the funds when it is due, and thus requires the use of current financial resources.In the Statement of Activities,however,interest expense is recognized as the interest accrues,regardless of when it is due. 23,210 Internal service funds are used by management to charge certain costs to individual funds. The net revenue of certain activities of internal service funds is reported with governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. 541,237 Certain revenues included in net position as soon as they are earned are not included in the change in fund balances until available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. Accounts receivable (18,274) Delinquent property taxes (46,265) Delinquent and deferred special assessments (409,666) Governmental funds do not report additions or deletions to certain long-term amounts related to pensions that are included in the change in net position. Deferred outflows—pension plan deferments 7,905,765 Deferred inflows—pension plan deferments (950,112) Change in net position—governmental activities $ (132,335) See notes to basic financial statements -24- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF FARMINGTON Statement of Revenues,Expenditures,and Changes in Fund Balances Budget and Actual General Fund Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Property taxes $ 8,867,170 $ 8,973,628 $ 106,458 Franchise taxes 100,000 100,000 - Licenses and permits 367,703 650,311 282,608 Intergovernmental 803,134 937,424 134,290 Charges for services 491,700 577,905 86,205 Fines and forfeits 65,000 41,750 (23,250) Investment earnings 18,462 41,969 23,507 Other 56,685 75,529 18,844 Total revenues 10,769,854 11,398,516 628,662 Expenditures Current General government 2,130,896 1,996,410 (134,486) Public safety 5,317,769 5,270,662 (47,107) Public works 2,158,911 1,941,856 (217,055) Parks and recreation 1,274,042 1,190,177 (83,865) Economic development 40,000 40,000 - Capital outlay Public safety 10,000 32,778 22,778 Parks and recreation - 17,858 17,858 Debt service Principal retirement 115,941 - (115,941) Interest and fiscal charges 4,059 1,178 (2,881) Total expenditures 11,051,618 10,490,919 (560,699) Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (281,764) 907,597 1,189,361 Other financing sources(uses) Transfers in 1,148,371 1,150,183 1,812 Transfers out (866,607) (1,737,307) (870,700) Total other financing sources(uses) 281,764 (587,124) (868,888) Net change in fund balances $ - 320,473 $ 320,473 Fund balances Beginning of year 4,744,818 End of year $ 5,065,291 See notes to basic financial statements -25- CITY OF FARMINGTON Statement of Net Position Proprietary Funds as of December 31,2016 Business-Type Activities-Enterprise Funds Liquor Sewer Solid Storm Operations Operations Waste Water Assets Current assets Cash and investments $ 1,006,456 $ 2,314,957 $ 1,273,906 $ 1,004,158 Cash restricted for drinking water treatment plant - - - - Receivables Accounts 70,624 442,222 484,230 145,030 Interest 2,205 5,058 2,787 2,194 Delinquent special assessments - 35,027 - - Due from other governments - - - - Inventory 469,893 - - - Prepaid items 21,371 111,518 - 160 Total current assets 1,570,549 2,908,782 1,760,923 1,151,542 Noncurrent assets Special assessments - 315,176 - - Capital assets Land - 85,000 - 1,192 Buildings - - - - Improvements other than buildings 121,012 - - - Machinery and equipment 242,513 726,038 1,468,631 55,581 Distribution system - - - - Collection system - 28,273,060 - 20,093,314 Less accumulated depreciation (363,525) (11,132,456) (1,140,830) (6,614,710) Total capital assets(net of accumulated depreciation) - 17,951,642 327,801 13,535,377 Total noncurrent assets - 18,266,818 327,801 13,535,377 Total assets 1,570,549 21,175,600 2,088,724 14,686,919 Deferred outflows of resources Pension plan deferments-PERA 178,576 - 138,892 - Total assets and deferred outflows of resources $ 1,749,125 $ 21,175,600 $ 2,227,616 $ 14,686,919 Liabilities Current liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ 81,947 $ 26,576 $ 195,156 $ 2,683 Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable - - - - Deposits payable - 1,010 - - Due to other governments 45,080 - 22,595 - Compensated absences payable-current 22,890 - 30,984 - Total current liabilities 149,917 27,586 248,735 2,683 Noncurrent liabilities Compensated absences payable 7,629 - 10,327 Net pension liability-PERA 426,031 - 331,357 - Net OPEB obligation 46,302 - 43,408 - Total noncurrent liabilities 479,962 - 385,092 - Total liabilities 629,879 27,586 633,827 2,683 Deferred inflows of resources Pension plan deferments-PERA 61,701 - 47,989 - Net position Investment in capital assets - 17,951,642 327,801 13,535,377 Restricted for drinking water treatment plant - - - - Unrestricted 1,057,545 3,196,372 1,217,999 1,148,859 Total net position 1,057,545 21,148,014 1,545,800 14,684,236 Total liabilities,deferred inflows of resources,and net position $ 1,749,125 $ 21,175,600 $ 2,227,616 $ 14,686,919 See notes to basic financial statements -26- Governmental Street Activities- Water Light Total Internal Service $ 5,714,203 $ 140,358 $ 11,454,038 $ 2,133,195 2,231,966 - 2,231,966 - 246,701 30,584 1,419,391 42,864 17,325 307 29,876 3,887 282 - 35,309 - 107 469,893 - 133,049 16,716 8,210,477 171,249 15,773,522 2,196,769 1,535 - 316,711 - 328,384 - 414,576 - 3,243,203 - 3,243,203 - 121,012 - 292,723 - 2,785,486 79,453 32,511,466 - 32,511,466 - 48,366,374 - (14,964,809) - (34,216,330) (79,453) 21,410,967 53,225,787 - 21,412,502 - 53,542,498 - 29,622,979 171,249 69,316,020 2,196,769 317,468 - $ 29,622,979 $ 171,249 $ 69,633,488 $ 2,196,769 $ 58,744 $ 104,984 $ 470,090 $ 49,413 315,934 32,000 - 33,010 599 816 - 68,491 - 53,874 19,069 91,560 104,984 625,465 385,015 17,956 - 757,388 - 89,710 - 865,054 - 91,560 104,984 1,490,519 385,015 109,690 - 21,410,967 - 53,225,787 - 2,231,966 - 2,231,966 - 5,888,486 66,265 12,575,526 1,811,754 29,531,419 66,265 68,033,279 1,811,754 $ 29,622,979 $ 171,249 $ 69,633,488 $ 2,196,769 -27- CITY OF FARMINGTON Statement of Revenues,Expenses,and Changes in Fund Net Position Proprietary Funds Year Ended December 31,2016 Business-Type Activities-Enterprise Funds Liquor Sewer Solid Storm Operations Operations Waste Water Operating revenue Sales $ 4,737,980 $ - $ - $ - Charges for services - 2,040,971 2,037,370 643,479 Insurance reimbursement - - - - Miscellaneous 4,333 2,888 4,191 - Total operating revenue 4,742,313 2,043,859 2,041,561 643,479 Cost of goods sold 3,537,858 - - - Gross profit 1,204,455 2,043,859 2,041,561 643,479 Operating expenses Personal services 474,824 2,925 391,419 692 Professional services 427,966 1,432,708 1,190,939 99,030 Materials and supplies 8,284 16,440 112,425 23,275 Insurance - - - - Depreciation - 597,200 80,379 411,991 Total operating expenses 911,074 2,049,273 1,775,162 534,988 Operating income(loss) 293,381 (5,414) 266,399 108,491 Nonoperating revenues(expenses) Intergovernmental - - 23,000 - Investment earnings 11,552 25,924 15,904 11,188 Gain on sale of capital assets - - 22,000 - Interest and fiscal charges - (1,879) - - Total nonoperating revenues(expenses) 11,552 24,045 60,904 11,188 Income(loss)before transfers 304,933 18,631 327,303 119,679 Transfers in - - - - Transfers out (204,113) (316,747) (128,595) (342,511) Change in net position 100,820 (298,116) 198,708 (222,832) Net position Beginning of year 956,725 21,446,130 1,347,092 14,907,068 End of year $ 1,057,545 $ 21,148,014 $ 1,545,800 $ 14,684,236 See notes to basic financial statements -28- Governmental Street Activities- Water Light Total Internal Service $ - $ - $ 4,737,980 $ - 1,425,941 224,403 6,372,164 2,853,622 - - - 360,160 205,702 378 217,492 - 1,631,643 224,781 11,327,636 3,213,782 - - 3,537,858 - 1,631,643 224,781 7,789,778 3,213,782 4,571 - 874,431 2,377,774 439,043 288,905 3,878,591 248,310 145,777 19 306,220 154,132 - - 300,047 769,720 - 1,859,290 - 1,359,111 288,924 6,918,532 3,080,263 272,532 (64,143) 871,246 133,519 - 23,000 10,789 72,998 1,683 139,249 17,797 - - 22,000 - (104) _ - (1,983) - 72,894 1,683 182,266 28,586 345,426 (62,460) 1,053,512 162,105 - - - 379,132 (436,140) - (1,428,106) - (90,714) (62,460) (374,594) 541,237 29,622,133 128,725 68,407,873 1,270,517 $ 29,531,419 $ 66,265 $ 68,033,279 $ 1,811,754 -29- CITY OF FARMINGTON Statement of Cash Flows Proprietary Funds Year Ended December 31,2016 Business-Type Activities-Enterprise Funds Liquor Sewer Solid Storm Operations Operations Waste Water Cash flows from operating activities Cash received from customers $ 4,726,210 $ 2,054,978 $ 1,990,747 $ 643,244 Cash receipts from other funds and reimbursements - - - - Cash payments to suppliers (3,967,822) (1,547,703) (1,189,528) (127,570) Cash payments to employees for services (460,257) (2,925) (359,424) (692) Cash payments for interfund services used - - - - Net cash flows from operating activities 298,131 504,350 441,795 514,982 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Intergovernmental revenue - - 23,000 - Cash received from other funds - - - - Transfers in - - - - Transfers out (204,113) (316,747) (128,595) (342,511) Net cash flows from noncapital financing activities (204,113) (316,747) (105,595) (342,511) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition and construction of capital assets - - (277,139) - Repayment of advances received from other funds - - - - Proceeds from the disposal of capital assets - - 22,000 - Interest and fiscal charges paid - (1,879) - - Net cash flows from capital and related financing activities - (1,879) (255,139) - Cash flows from investing activities Interest received on investments 11,706 26,393 16,208 11,099 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 105,724 212,117 97,269 183,570 Cash and investments Beginning of year 900,732 2,102,840 1,176,637 820,588 End of year $ 1,006,456 $ 2,314,957 $ 1,273,906 $ 1,004,158 Reconciliation of operating income(loss)to net cash flows from operating activities Operating income(loss) $ 293,381 $ (5,414) $ 266,399 $ 108,491 Adjustments to reconcile operating income(loss)to net cash flows from operating activities Depreciation - 597,200 80,379 411,991 Change in assets,deferred outflows of resources,liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources Accounts receivable (16,103) 7,312 (50,814) (235) Special assessments - 1,032 - - Due from other governments - 2,775 - - Inventory (22,700) - - - Prepaid items (10,238) (111,518) - 190 Deferred outflows of resources-pension plan deferments (138,852) - (107,996) - Accounts and contracts payable 36,287 19,408 111,129 (5,455) Accrued salaries and employee benefits - - - - Deposits payable - 1,010 - - Due to other governments 2,937 (7,455) 2,707 - Compensated absences (16,059) - 8,360 - Net pension liability 135,447 - 105,347 - Net OPEB obligation 5,689 - 4,240 - Deferred inflows of resources-pension plan deferments 28,342 - 22,044 - Net cash flows from operating activities $ 298,131 $ 504,350 $ 441,795 $ 514,982 See notes to basic financial statements -30- Governmental Street Activities- Water Light Total Internal Service $ 1,649,981 $ 228,805 $ 11,293,965 $ - 3,170,811 (590,646) (210,896) (7,634,165) - (4,571) - (827,869) (2,293,393) (674,704) 1,054,764 17,909 2,831,931 202,714 23,000 10,789 120,000 - 120,000 - 379,132 (436,140) - (1,428,106) - (316,140) - (1,285,106) 389,921 (277,139) - 111,775 - 111,775 - 22,000 - (104) - _ (1,983) - 111,671 - (145,347) - 74,070 1,693 141,169 17,909 924,365 19,602 1,542,647 610,544 7,021,804 120,756 12,143,357 1,522,651 $ 7,946,169 $ 140,358 $ 13,686,004 $ 2,133,195 $ 272,532 $ (64,143) $ 871,246 $ 133,519 769,720 - 1,859,290 - 12,585 4,024 (43,231) (42,864) 7,859 - 8,891 - 2,775 (107) (22,700) - (121,566) 72,385 (246,848) - (5,665) 78,028 233,732 25,963 12,082 (2,106) - (1,096) (97) (161) - (1,972) - (7,699) 1,833 240,794 - 9,929 - 50,386 - $ 1,054,764 $ 17,909 $ 2,831,931 $ 202,714 -31- CITY OF FARMINGTON Statement of Net Position Fiduciary Fund as of December 31,2016 Agency Fund Assets Cash and investments $ 198,084 Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ 12,000 Deposits payable 186,084 Total liabilities $ 198,084 See notes to basic financial statements -32- CITY OF FARMINGTON Notes to Basic Financial Statements December 31,2016 NOTE 1 —SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A. Organization The City of Farmington, Minnesota (the City) was incorporated in 1872 and operates under the state of Minnesota Statutory Plan A form of government. The City Council is the governing body and is composed of an elected mayor and four councilmembers who exercise legislative authority and determine all matters of policy. The City provides the following services: public safety, roads, water and sanitary sewer, storm water management, solid waste and recycling disposal, public improvements, planning and zoning,recreation,and general administration. The accounting policies of the City conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applicable to governmental units. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the accepted standard setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles. B. Reporting Entity As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, these financial statements include the City (the primary government) and its component unit. Component units are legally separate entities for which the primary government is financially accountable, or for which the exclusion of the component unit would render the financial statements of the primary government misleading. The criteria used to determine if the primary government is financially accountable for a component unit includes whether or not the primary government appoints the voting majority of the potential component unit's board, is able to impose its will on the potential component unit, is in a relationship of financial benefit or burden with the potential component unit, or is fiscally depended upon by the potential component unit. As a result of applying these criteria,one organization has been included in this report as follows: Discretely Presented Component Unit—The Farmington Economic Development Authority (EDA) is the City's official decision-making body regarding economic development. It promotes the retention and expansion of existing businesses while attracting new businesses to the community in order to promote a diversified tax base,job opportunities, and convenient shopping for residents. The EDA is a legally separate entity from the City; however, the City is financially accountable for the EDA. The EDA's governing board is comprised of two City Council members, two Independent School District No. 192 School Board members, and three residents appointed by the City Council, and the City has ability to impose its will on the EDA. The EDA does not issue separate financial statements. Information on the EDA's governmental funds is presented as supplemental information elsewhere in this report. C. Government-Wide Financial Statement Presentation The government-wide financial statements (Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities) display information about the reporting government as a whole, except for fiduciary activities. These statements include all of the financial activities of the City. Governmental activities, which are normally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which significantly rely upon sales, fees, and charges for support. -33- NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(CONTINUED) The government-wide Statement of Activities demonstrates the extent to which the direct expense of a given function(general government, public safety, public works,parks and recreation, and economic and community development) or business-type activity (liquor operations, utility services) is offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or business-type activity. Interest on debt is considered an indirect expense and is reported separately in the Statement of Activities.Depreciation expense is included in the direct expenses of each function.Program revenues include: 1)charges to customers or applicants who purchase,use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or business-type activity and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or business-type activity. Taxes and other items not included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Internally directed revenues are reported as general revenues rather than program revenues. The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes and special assessments are recognized as revenues in the fiscal year for which they are certified for levy. Grants and similar items are recognized when all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. As a general rule,the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government-wide financial statements. However, charges between the City's enterprise funds and other functions are not eliminated, as that would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported in those functions. D. Fund Financial Statement Presentation Separate fund financial statements are provided for governmental,proprietary,and fiduciary funds.Major individual governmental and enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Aggregated information for the remaining nonmajor funds is reported in a single column in the respective fund financial statements. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis of accounting transactions are recorded in the following manner: 1. Revenue Recognition — Revenue is recognized when it becomes measurable and available. "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined and "available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days after year-end. Only the portion of special assessments receivable due within the current fiscal period is considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. Grants and similar items are recognized when all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met.Proceeds of long-term debt are reported as other financing sources. Major revenues susceptible to accrual include property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, and interest earned on investments. Major revenue that is not susceptible to accrual includes licenses and permits, fees, and miscellaneous revenue. Such revenues are recorded only when received because they are not measurable until collected. 2. Recording of Expenditures —Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability is incurred, except for principal and interest on long-term debt and other long-term liabilities which are recognized as expenditures to the extent they have matured. Capital asset acquisitions are reported as capital outlay expenditures in the governmental funds. -34- NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(CONTINUED) Proprietary fund financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and accrual basis of accounting, similar to the government-wide financial statements. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the City's enterprise funds and internal service funds are charges to customers for sales and services. The operating expenses for the enterprise funds and internal service funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses that do not meet this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. Aggregated information for the internal service funds is reported in a single column in the proprietary fund financial statements. Because the principal user of the internal services is the City's governmental activities, the financial statements of the internal service funds are consolidated into the governmental column when presented in the government-wide financial statements. The cost of these services is reported in the appropriate functional activity. Agency funds have no measurement focus, but utilize the accrual basis of accounting for reporting assets and liabilities. Description of Funds The City reports the following major governmental funds: General Fund—This fund is the City's primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government,except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Debt Service Fund—This fund accounts for the financial resources accumulated and payments made for principal and interest on long-term bond-financed debt of the City. State Aid Construction Capital Projects Fund—This fund, also referred to as the Road and Bridge Fund, accounts for street construction and road/street rehabilitation or reconstruction projects related to municipal state aids. Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects Fund — This fund accounts for the construction and improvement of storm water trunk infrastructure within the City. Permanent Improvement Revolving Capital Projects Fund — This fund accounts for street construction projects financed with multiple funding sources. Maintenance Capital Projects Fund — This fund accounts for operations and activities related to maintenance of city roads,trails,and buildings. The City reports the following major enterprise funds: Liquor Operations Fund — The Liquor Operations Fund accounts for the retail operations of the City's two off-sale municipal liquor stores. Sewer Operations Fund — The Sewer Operations Fund accounts for the operations of the City's wastewater collection and treatment systems. Solid Waste Fund — The Solid Waste Fund accounts for the revenue and expenses related to the operation of the City's garbage collection and recycling programs. -35- NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(CONTINUED) Storm Water Fund — The Storm Water Fund accounts for revenues and expenses related to the maintenance and cleaning of the City's existing storm water collection and holding pond system. Water Fund — The Water Fund accounts for the operations of the City's water distribution system including wells,reservoirs,and trunk infrastructure system. Street Light Fund—The Street Light Fund accounts for the financial activities related to city-owned street lights. Additionally,the City reports the following fund types: Internal Service Funds — Internal service funds account for the financing of goods and services provided to other departments or agencies of the City on a cost reimbursement basis. The City's internal service funds account for employee benefits expenses, insurance, fleet services, and technology services. Agency Fund—The Agency Fund is used to record the receipt and remittance of monies held by the City as an agent primarily for land developers and builders that will be refunded to the respective depositors when the conditions are satisfied in accordance with the respective agreements. E. Budgets and Budgetary Accounting Budgets are prepared annually on a modified accrual basis and legally adopted by the City Council for the General Fund, special revenue funds, Debt Service Fund (in total), capital projects funds, and enterprise funds. Budgeted expenditure appropriations lapse at year-end. The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements: 1. The city administrator submits a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following January 1 to the City Council. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. 2. The City Council reviews the proposed budgets and makes the appropriate changes. 3. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. 4. The budgets are legally enacted through passage of a resolution on a departmental basis and can be expended by each department based upon detailed budget estimates for individual expenditure accounts. 5. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year for the governmental and enterprise funds. 6. The legal level of budgetary control is at the fund level. Expenditures may not legally exceed budgeted appropriations at the total fund level. Monitoring of budgets is maintained at the expenditure category level (i.e., personnel services, supplies, other services and charges, etc.) within each department. Management can exceed appropriations at the department level without City Council approval. The City Council must approve any amounts over budget at the fund level by resolution or through the disbursement process. 7. The City Council may authorize transfers of budgeted amounts between funds. -36- NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(CONTINUED) For the year ended December 31, 2016, expenditures exceeded budget for the following funds. Expenditures in excess of budget were approved by the City Council either through the disbursement process or separate City Council action. Budgeted Actual Expenditures Expenditures Major funds Debt Service $ 5,408,678 $ 5,505,736 State Aid Construction Capital Projects $ — $ 194 Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects $ — $ 163 Maintenance Capital Projects $ 621,500 $ 1,979,232 Nonmajor special revenue funds Park Improvement $ 60,000 $ 76,983 Nonmajor capital projects funds Sanitary Sewer Trunk $ — $ 64,750 Cable Communications $ 81,000 $ 82,488 Fire Capital Projects $ 222,500 $ 256,749 Private Capital Projects $ 20,000 $ 22,096 Recreation Capital Projects $ 7,500 $ 178,529 F. Cash and Investments Cash and investments include balances from all funds that are combined and invested to the extent available in various securities as authorized by state law. Earnings from the pooled investments are allocated to the respective funds based on month-end outstanding balances for each fund. Certain resources set aside for future use, such as the construction of a drinking water treatment plant, or set aside for future bond refunding, are classified as restricted assets on the Statement of Net Position, because their use is limited by outside agreements. Interest on these investments is allocated to the respective funds. For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the City considers all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity from the time of purchase by the City of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The proprietary funds' portion in the government-wide cash and investment management pool is considered cash equivalent. It is the City's policy to invest in a manner that seeks to ensure preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. Safety of principal is the foremost objective, but liquidity and yield are also important considerations. The objective will be to mitigate credit risk by purchasing only highly rated securities or with adequate collateral and interest rate risk by matching maturities to cash flow needs and holding securities to maturity. The City reports all investments at fair value. The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs; and Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. Debt securities classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using a matrix pricing technique. Matrix pricing is used to value securities based on the securities' relationship to benchmark quoted prices. See Note 2 for the City's recurring fair value measurements as of the current year-end. -37- NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(CONTINUED) G. Receivables Utility and miscellaneous accounts receivable are reported at gross. Since the City is generally able to certify delinquent amounts to the county for collection as special assessments; no allowance for uncollectible accounts has been provided on current receivables. H. Interfund Receivables and Payables In the fund financial statements, activity between funds that is representative of lending or borrowing , arrangements is reported as either"due to/from other funds" (current portion) or"advances to/from other funds." All other outstanding balances between funds are reported as "due to/from other funds." Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business-type activities are reported in the government-wide financial statements as"internal balances." I. Property Taxes Property tax levies are set by the City Council in December of each year, and certified to Dakota County for collection in the following year. In Minnesota, counties act as collection agents for all property taxes, spreading the levies over all taxable property. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City on that date. Tax levies on real property are payable in two equal installments on May 15 and October 15. Personal property taxes are due in full on May 15. The county provides tax settlements to cities and other taxing districts four times a year: in June,July,December, and January. Property taxes are recognized as revenue in the year levied in the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund financial statements. In the governmental fund financial statements, taxes are recognized as revenue when received in cash or within 60 days after year-end. Taxes which remain unpaid on December 31 are classified as delinquent taxes receivable, and are offset by a deferred inflow of resources in the governmental fund financial statements. J. Special Assessments Special assessments represent the financing for public improvements paid for by benefiting property owners. Special assessments are recorded as receivables upon certification to the county. Special assessments are recognized as revenue in the year levied in the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund financial statements. In the governmental fund financial statements, special assessments are recognized as revenue when received in cash or within 60 days after year-end. Governmental fund special assessments receivable which remain unpaid on December 31 are offset by a deferred inflow of resources in the governmental fund financial statements. K. Inventories Inventories of the proprietary funds, primarily the liquor operations, are stated at cost, which approximates market,using the average cost method. L. Prepaid Items Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements. Prepaid items are reported using the consumption method and recorded as expenditures/expenses at the time of consumption. -38- NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(CONTINUED) M. Capital Assets Capital assets, which include property, buildings, improvements, equipment, and infrastructure assets (roads,bridges, sidewalks, and similar items),and intangible assets, such as easements,are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities columns in the government-wide financial statements. Such assets are capitalized at historical cost, or estimated historical cost for assets where actual historical cost is not available. Donated assets are recorded as capital assets at their estimated acquisition value on the date of donation. The City defines capital assets as those with an initial, individual cost of$5,000 or more with an estimated useful life in excess of three years. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend asset lives are not capitalized. Capital assets are recorded in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, but are not reported in the governmental fund financial statements. Interest incurred during the construction phase of capital assets of business-type activities is included as part of the capitalized value of the assets constructed. Land, easements, and construction in progress are not depreciated. The other classes of capital assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Buildings 20-50 years Improvements other than buildings 20-50 years Machinery and equipment 5-20 years Infrastructure 30 years Collection/distribution systems 50 years N. Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources In addition to assets, a statement of financial position may report a separate financial statement element called deferred outflows of resources, representing consumptions of net position that apply to future periods which are not recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. The City has one item that qualifies for reporting in this category, deferred outflows of resources related to pensions, reported in the government-wide and enterprise funds Statement of Net Position. This deferred outflow results from differences between expected and actual experience, changes of assumptions, and projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments, and from contributions to the plan subsequent to the measurement date and before the end of the reporting period. These amounts are deferred and amortized as required under pension standards. In addition to liabilities, statements of financial position or balance sheets may report a separate financial statement element called deferred inflows of resources, representing acquisitions of net position that applies to future periods which are not recognized as an inflow of resources(revenue)until that time. The City has two types of items which qualify for reporting in this category. The first item, unavailable revenue, arises only under the modified accrual basis of accounting and, therefore, is reported only in the governmental funds Balance Sheet. The governmental funds report unavailable revenue from two sources: property taxes and special assessments. These amounts are deferred and recognized as inflows of resources in the period that the amounts become available. The second item, deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, is reported in the government-wide and enterprise funds Statement of Net Position. This deferred inflow results from differences between expected and actual experience, changes of assumptions, and projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments. These amounts are deferred and amortized as required under pension standards. -39- NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(CONTINUED) O. Long-Term Obligations In the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities. Bond premiums and discounts, if material, are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the straight-line method. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. P. Compensated Absences It is the City's policy to permit employees to accumulate earned, but unused leave benefits as either paid time off(PTO), or vacation and sick leave. Under the City's personnel policies and collective bargaining contracts, city employees are granted leave benefits in varying amounts based on length of service. No liability is recorded for non-vesting accumulating rights to receive sick leave benefits. As benefits accrue to employees,the accumulated PTO,vacation,and vested sick leave is reported as expense and liability in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements. Accrued PTO, vacation, and any portion of sick leave payable to employees upon termination are reported as expenditures in the governmental fund that will pay them when they become due and payable. Q. Pensions For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)and additions to/deductions from the PERA's fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by the PERA except that the PERA's fiscal year-end is June 30. For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. The PERA has a special funding situation created by a direct aid contribution made by the state of Minnesota. The direct aid is a result of the merger of the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund into the PERA on January 1,2015. R. Risk Management The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts: theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. The City continues to carry commercial insurance for risks of loss, including workers' compensation, property and general liability, and employee health and accident insurance. The City retains risk for the deductible portions of the insurance policies. The amount of these deductibles is considered immaterial to the financial statements. Property and Casualty Insurance — Property and casualty insurance is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust(LMCIT), a public entity risk pool currently operating as a common risk management and insurance program for Minnesota cities: general liability, excess liability, property, automobile,marine,crime, federal laws,employee dishonesty,boiler,petro fund,and open meeting law. The City pays an annual premium to the LMCIT for its insurance coverage. The LMCIT is self-sustaining through member premiums and will reinsure through commercial companies for excess claims. The LMCIT allows the pool to make additional assessments to make the pool self-sustaining. -40- NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(CONTINUED) Current state statutes (Minnesota Statutes Subd. 466.04)provide limits of liability for the City. These limits are that the combination of defense expense and indemnification expense shall not exceed $500,000 in the case of one claimant or $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City retains risk for the deductible portion of its insurance policies and any potential judicial ruling in excess of the statutory maximum. The City has never had a claim in excess of the statutory maximum. There were no significant reductions in insurance from the previous year or settlements in excess of insurance coverage for any of the past three fiscal years. Workers' Compensation Insurance — Workers' compensation coverage is provided through a pooled self-insurance program through the LMCIT. The City pays an annual premium to the LMCIT. The City is subject to supplemental assessments as deemed necessary by the LMCIT. The LMCIT reinsures through Workers' Compensation Reinsurance Association as required by law. The City's premiums are determined after loss experience is known. The amount of premium adjustment, if any, is considered immaterial,and is not recorded until received or paid. S. Net Position and Flow Assumptions In the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, net position represents the difference between assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources.Net position is displayed in three components: • Net Investment in Capital Assets—Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by any outstanding debt attributable to acquire capital assets. • Restricted Net Position —Consists of net position restricted when there are limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments. • Unrestricted Net Position—All other elements of net position that do not meet the definition of "restricted"or"net investment in capital assets." The City applies restricted resources first when an expense is incurred for which both restricted and unrestricted resources are available. T. Fund Balance Classifications and Flow Assumptions In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent.These classifications are as follows: • Nonspendable — Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items, inventory, and other long-term assets. • Restricted — Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors,grantors,or contributors;or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. • Committed—Consists of internally imposed constraints that are established by resolution of the City Council. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the City Council removes or changes the specified use by taking the same type of action it employed to previously commit those amounts. -41- NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(CONTINUED) • Assigned — Consists of internally imposed constraints for amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. These constraints are established by the City Council and/or management. The City Council has adopted a fund balance policy which delegates the authority to assign amounts for specific purposes to the city administrator and/or finance director. • Unassigned — The residual classification for the General Fund, which also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, the City first uses restricted resources,then unrestricted resources as needed. When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, the City uses resources in the following order: 1)committed,2)assigned, and 3)unassigned. U. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. NOTE 2—DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS A. Components of Cash and Investments Cash and investments at year-end consist of the following: Deposits $ 6,519,604 Investments 37,606,609 Total $ 44,126,213 Cash and investments are included on the basic financial statements as follows: Primary government Statement of Net Position Cash and investments $ 31,745,188 Restricted assets—temporarily restricted Cash for future drinking water treatment plant 2,231,966 Cash and investments for debt service 9,620,000 Fiduciary fund Cash and investments 198,084 Component unit Statement of Net Position Cash and investments 330,975 Total $ 44,126,213 -42- NOTE 2—DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS(CONTINUED) B. Deposits In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at depository banks authorized by the City Council,including checking and savings accounts. The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits: Custodial Credit Risk—In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure,the City's deposits may be lost. Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit insurance,corporate surety bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110 percent of the deposits not covered by federal deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated"A"or better; revenue obligations rated "AA" or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral. The City has no additional deposit policies addressing custodial credit risk. At year-end, the carrying amount of the City's deposits was $6,519,604, while the balance on the bank records was $6,676,028. At December 31, 2016, all deposits were fully covered by federal depository insurance,surety bonds,or by collateral held by the City's agent in the City's name. C. Investments The City has the following investments at year-end: Fair Value Credit Risk Measurements Interest Risk—Maturity Duration in Years Investment Type Rating Agency Using Less Than 1 1 to 5 5 to 10 Total U.S.agency securities AA S&P Level 1 $ 16,496,450 $ 799,904 $ — $ 17,296,354 Municipal bonds AAA S&P Level 1 — 248,667 — 248,667 Municipal bonds AAA S&P Level 2 — 848,019 — 848,019 Municipal bonds AA S&P Level 1 120,332 132,400 — 252,732 Municipal bonds AA S&P Level 2 716,683 325,612 — 1,042,295 Municipal bonds AA Moody's Level 1 1,102,128 507,112 — 1,609,240 Municipal bonds AA Moody's Level 2 150,267 65,732 — 215,999 Negotiable certificates of deposit Not rated Level 1 4,880,247 4,980,817 611,625 10,472,689 Negotiable certificates of deposit Not rated Level 2 4,582,035 534,728 503,851 5,620,614 Total investments $ 28,048,142 $ 8,442,991 $ 1,115,476 $ 37,606,609 -43- NOTE 2—DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS(CONTINUED) Investments are subject to various risks,the following of which are considered the most significant: Custodial Credit Risk — For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker-dealer) the City would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party.The City's investment policies do not further address this risk. Credit Risk—This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the City's investments to direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the investments have a final maturity of 13 months or less;general obligations rated"A"or better;revenue obligations rated"AA" or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rated"A"or better; bankers' acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank,domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories;repurchase or reverse purchase agreements and securities lending agreements with financial institutions qualified as a "depository" by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000; that are a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; or certain Minnesota securities broker-dealers. The City's investment policies do not further address credit risk. Concentration Risk — This is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the City's investments (considered 5.0 percent or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S.guaranteed investments (such as treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. The City's investment policy places no limit on the amount the City may invest in any one issuer. However, it discusses the need to diversify investments to minimize risk. At year-end, 43.9 percent of the City's investment portfolio consists of paper issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank, the majority of which mature in less than 30 days and will be used to redeem bonds on February 1,2017. Interest Rate Risk—This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed rate investments resulting from changes in interest rates (the longer the period for which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The City's investment policy states the investment portfolio should be structured to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations. The policy limits investment maturities as a means of managing exposure to fair value losses arising from increasing interest rates,stating that no more than 30 percent of total investments should extend beyond 5 years and none should extend beyond 15 years. The City's year-end investment portfolio maturities comply with this policy. -44- NOTE 3-INTERFUND BALANCES AND TRANSFERS A. Interfund Balances The City had the following interfund balances at year-end: Receivable Fund Payable Fund Purpose Amount Due from/to other funds Governmental Governmental General Fund Storm Water Trunk Allocation of costs $ 127 Storm Water Trunk Debt Service Debt financing(1) 133,000 Storm Water Trunk Maintenance Construction financing(3) 103,500 Total due from/to other funds $ 236,627 Advances to/from other funds Governmental Governmental Storm Water Trunk Debt Service Debt financing(1) $ 376,854 Storm Water Trunk Debt Service Debt financing(2) 300,000 Storm Water Trunk Maintenance Construction financing(3) 1,131,391 Total advances to/from other funds $ 1,808,245 (1)Advance of$509,854 to finance G.O.2010D Bonds.Annual payments through 6/30/2020. 1.8%interest. (2)Advance of$300,000 to finance G.O.2010C Bonds.Principal due 12/31/2022.2.3%interest. (3)Advance of$1,234,891 to finance street construction.Annual payments through 6/30/2030.2.1%interest. B. Interfund Transfers The following transfers were made during the year in accordance with budget appropriations or as approved by City Council resolution to fund administrative overhead costs, fund debt service payments, or close funds: Transfers In Proprietary Governmental Funds Funds Debt Internal Transfers Out General Service Maintenance Nonmajor Service Total Governmental funds General $ - $ 193,709 $ 633,969 $ 536,607 $ 373,022 $ 1,737,307 Debt Service 1,812 - - - - 1,812 State Aid Construction - 1,491,000 - - - 1,491,000 Storm Water Trunk - 1,241,118 - - - 1,241,118 Maintenance - - 10,000 - - 10,000 Nonmajor - - - 60,000 - 60,000 Proprietary funds Enterprise Liquor Operations 53,040 - 36,301 112,772 2,000 204,113 Sewer Operations 281,859 31,138 - - 3,750 316,747 Solid Waste 81,528 46,707 - - 360 128,595 Storm Water 326,942 15,569 - - - 342,511 Water 405,002 31,138 - - - 436,140 Total $ 1,150,183 $ 3,050,379 $ 680,270 $ 709,379 $ 379,132 $ 5,969,343 -45- NOTE 4—CAPITAL ASSETS Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31,2016 was as follows: A. Changes in Capital Assets Used in Governmental Activities Beginning Ending Balance Additions Deletions Balance Capital assets,not depreciated Land $ 1,441,957 $ — $ — $ 1,441,957 Easements 307,867 — — 307,867 Total capital assets,not depreciated 1,749,824 — — 1,749,824 Capital assets,depreciated Buildings 21,413,765 — — 21,413,765 Improvements other than buildings 1,972,316 58,454 (380,514) 1,650,256 Machinery and equipment 5,565,078 410,668 (211,547) 5,764,199 Infrastructure 57,802,186 — — 57,802,186 Total capital assets,depreciated 86,753,345 469,122 (592,061) 86,630,406 Less accumulated depreciation on Buildings 5,245,089 440,275 — 5,685,364 Improvements other than buildings 1,492,197 76,725 (315,598) 1,253,324 Machinery and equipment 4,275,435 276,643 (211,547) 4,340,531 Infrastructure 24,708,739 1,293,854 — 26,002,593 Total accumulated depreciation 35,721,460 2,087,497 (527,145) 37,281,812 Total capital assets,depreciated 51,031,885 (1,618,375) (64,916) 49,348,594 Net capital assets $ 52,781,709 $ (1,618,375) $ (64,916) $ 51,098,418 B. Changes in Capital Assets Used in Business-Type Activities Beginning Ending Balance Additions Deletions Balance Capital assets,not depreciated Land $ 414,576 $ — $ — $ 414,576 Capital assets,depreciated Buildings 3,243,203 — — 3,243,203 Improvements other than buildings 121,012 — — 121,012 Machinery and equipment 2,603,974 277,139 (95,627) 2,785,486 Collection/distribution systems 80,877,840 — — 80,877,840 Total capital assets,depreciated 86,846,029 277,139 (95,627) 87,027,541 Less accumulated depreciation on Buildings 3,013,989 91,987 — 3,105,976 Improvements other than buildings 121,012 — — 121,012 Machinery and equipment 2,311,096 121,503 (95,627) 2,336,972 Collection/distribution systems 27,006,570 1,645,800 — 28,652,370 Total accumulated depreciation 32,452,667 1,859,290 (95,627) 34,216,330 Total capital assets,depreciated 54,393,362 (1,582,151) — 52,811,211 Net capital assets $ 54,807,938 $ (1,582,151) $ — $ 53,225,787 -46- NOTE 4—CAPITAL ASSETS(CONTINUED) C. Depreciation Expense by Function Depreciation expense was charged to the following functions: Governmental activities General government $ 215,624 Public safety 284,836 Public works 1,413,770 Parks and recreation 173,267 Total depreciation expense—governmental activities $ 2,087,497 Business-type activities Sewer operations $ 597,200 Solid waste 80,379 Storm water 411,991 Water 769,720 Total depreciation expense—business-type activities $ 1,859,290 NOTE 5—OPERATING LEASES The City has two retail liquor stores known colloquially as Downtown and Pilot Knob. The Downtown store consists of 6,250 square feet of space in the City Center. In 2017,the City approved a two-year lease extension at a monthly rent of$8,594 plus a proportionate share of common area operating expenses. The City has the option to extend the lease one additional year at rates to be negotiated. In 2016, the City paid $95,052 in rent for the Downtown store and$39,360 for common area operating expenses. The Pilot Knob location occupies a 4,758-square foot store in the Farmington Gateway Center. In March 2016, the City renewed an existing lease for a three-year term at a monthly cost of$6,344 plus a proportionate share of common area operating expenses. The City has the option to renew for an additional three-year term at set lease rates. The City paid $76,128 in rent for the Pilot Knob store and $41,395 for common area operating expenses during 2016. The following is a schedule by year of future minimum payments required under the leases, including the lease extension approved in April 2017 for the Downtown location: Year Ending December 31, Amount 2017 $ 175,608 2018 179,253 2019 129,940 $ 484,801 -47- NOTE 6—LONG-TERM DEBT A. Components of Long-Term Debt Final Original Interest Issue Maturity Balance— Issue Rate Date Date End of Year Governmental activities General obligation improvement bonds G.O.Improvement Bonds 2008A $ 1,355,000 3.20-4.10% 07/08/2008 02/01/2024 $ 825,000 • G.O.Improvement Bonds 2008B $ 8,545,000 3.00-3.90% 07/08/2008 02/01/2023 4,560,000 G.O.Improvement Bonds 2010C $ 2,455,000 2.00-3.75% 06/10/2010 02/01/2027 1,805,000 G.O.Improvement Refunding Bonds 2011A $ 2,385,000 2.00-2.50% 08/25/2011 02/01/2019 975,000 G.O.Improvement Refunding Bonds 2013A $ 5,365,000 2.00% 01/15/2013 02/01/2022 4,030,000 G.O.Street Reconstruction Bonds 2013B $ 1,495,000 0.45-1.95% 10/09/2013 02/01/2020 1,235,000 G.O.Street Reconstruction Bonds 2015A $ 3,050,000 2.00-3.00% 10/15/2015 02/01/2030 3,050,000 G.O.Improvement Refunding Bonds 2016A $ 3,450,000 2.00% 12/01/2016 02/01/2023 3,450,000 Total general obligation improvement bonds 19,930,000 Capital improvement bonds G.O.Capital Improvement Bonds 2007A $ 9,990,000 4.00-4.20% 06/28/2007 02/01/2028 6,935,000 G.O.Capital Improvement Refunding Bonds 2016B $ 4,540,000 2.00-3.00% 12/01/2016 02/01/2028 4,540,000 G.O.Capital Improvement Refunding Bonds 2016C $ 1,630,000 2.00% 12/01/2016 02/01/2020 1,630,000 Total capital improvement bonds 13,105,000 Public project revenue bond G.O.Capital Improvement Bonds 2010A $ 3,850,000 2.00-4.00% 01/13/2010 02/01/2022 2,085,000 Revenue bonds G.O.Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds 2010B $ 1,200,000 2.00-3.25% 01/13/2010 02/01/2022 640,000 Certificates of indebtedness G.O.Equipment Certificate 2010D $ 1,145,000 1.00-3.10% 06/10/2010 02/01/2020 535,000 Total governmental activities bonds 36,295,000 Unamortized premium 738,645 Compensated absences 876,173 Net pension liability—PERA 13,728,296 Net OPEB obligation 795,765 Total governmental activities $52,433,879 Business-type activities Compensated absences $ 71,830 Net pension liability—PERA 757,388 Net OPEB obligation 89,710 Total business-type activities $ 918,928 -48- NOTE 6-LONG-TERM DEBT(CONTINUED) B. Changes in Long-Term Debt Beginning Ending Due Within Balance Additions Deletions Balance One Year Governmental activities G.O.improvement bonds $ 18,375,000 $ 3,450,000 $ 1,895,000 $ 19,930,000 $ 8,500,000 Capital improvement bonds 8,860,000 6,170,000 1,925,000 13,105,000 6,935,000 Public project revenue bond 2,395,000 - 310,000 2,085,000 320,000 Revenue bonds 796,534 - 156,534 640,000 95,000 Certificates of indebtedness 660,000 - 125,000 535,000 535,000 Unamortized bond premium 277,972 500,095 39,422 738,645 Compensated absences 769,989 520,305 414,121 876,173 657,131 Net pension liability-PERA 5,495,888 10,288,752 2,056,344 13,728,296 - Net OPEB obligation 707,954 90,972 3,161 795,765 - Total governmental activities 38,338,337 21,020,124 6,924,582 52,433,879 17,042,131 Business-type activities Compensated absences 79,529 45,672 53,371 71,830 53,874 Net pension liability-PERA 516,594 377,799 137,005 757,388 - Net OPEB obligation 79,781 10,280 351 89,710 - Total business-type activities 675,904 433,751 190,727 918,928 53,874 Total government-wide $ 39,014,241 $ 21,453,875 $ 7,115,309 $ 53,352,807 $ 17,096,005 C. Minimum Debt Payments Minimum annual payments required to retire bonds are as follows: Year Ending G.O.Improvement Capital Improvement Public Project Revenue December 31, Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2017 $ 8,500,000 $ 370,736 $ 6,935,000 $ 247,119 $ 320,000 $ 70,375 2018 1,980,000 227,134 555,000 150,900 330,000 60,213 2019 2,240,000 183,447 530,000 140,050 340,000 49,325 2020 2,220,000 136,973 545,000 129,300 350,000 36,800 2021 1,470,000 98,050 505,000 116,275 365,000 22,500 2022-2026 2,670,000 204,750 2,800,000 338,600 380,000 7,600 2027-2030 850,000 38,,312 1,235,000 24,850 - - Total $ 19,930,000 $ 1,259,402 $ 13,105,000 $ 1,147,094 $ 2,085,000 $ 246,813 Year Ending Revenue Certificates of Indebtedness Total December 31, Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2017 $ 95,000 $ 18,378 $ 535,000 $ 7,607 $ 16,385,000 $ 714,215 2018 100,000 15,731 - - 2,965,000 453,978 2019 105,000 12,691 - - 3,215,000 385,513 2020 110,000 9,262 - - 3,225,000 312,335 2021 115,000 5,606 - - 2,455,000 242,431 2022-2026 115,000 1,869 - - 5,965,000 552,819 2027-2030 - - - - 2,085,000 63,162 Total $ 640,000 $ 63,537 $ 535,000 $ 7,607 $ 36,295,000 $ 2,724,453 -49- NOTE 6—LONG-TERM DEBT(CONTINUED) D. Descriptions of Long-Term Debt • General Obligation Bonds — The City issues general obligation bonds to provide funds for the acquisition and construction of major capital improvements or to refinance (refund) previous bond issues. The reporting entity's long-term debt is segregated between the amounts to be repaid from governmental activities and amounts to be repaid from business-type activities (if any). General obligation bonds are direct obligations and pledge the full faith and credit of the City. The City has elected to redeem the 2018 through 2020 maturities of its General Obligation Equipment Certificate of Indebtedness, Series 2010D on their February 1, 2017 call date using available internal resources. Redeeming these bonds in advance of their stated maturities will reduce future interest payments by$24,630. In December 2016, the City issued $3,450,000 of General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A. The proceeds of this issue will be used to redeem, in advance of their stated maturities, the 2018 through 2027 maturities of the City's 2008A, 2008B, and 2010C Improvement Bonds, on the February 1, 2017 call date of the refunded issues. This current refunding will reduce the City's total future debt service payments by approximately $835,567 and result in present value savings of approximately$636,732. In December 2016, the City issued $4,540,000 of General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B and $1,630,000 of Taxable General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2016C. The proceeds of these issues will be used to redeem, in advance of their stated maturities, the 2018 through 2028 maturities of the City's 2007A Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, on the February 1, 2017 call date of the refunded issue. This current refunding will reduce the City's total future debt service payments by approximately $1,037,938 and result in present value savings of approximately$968,869. The City is subject to statutory limitation by the state of Minnesota for bonded indebtedness payable principally from property taxes. As of December 31, 2016, the City had not utilized $27,928,247 of its net legal debt margin. • Net OPEB Obligation — This liability represents the City's other post-employment benefits obligation(OPEB)as further described later in these notes. The General,Liquor,and Solid Waste Funds will be used to liquidate this liability. • Net Pension Liability—PERA—This liability represents the City's pension benefit obligations as further described later in these notes. The General, Liquor Operations, and Solid Waste Funds will be used to liquidate this liability. • Compensated Absences—This liability represents vested benefits earned by employees through the end of the year, which will be paid or used in future periods. The General, Liquor, and Solid Waste Funds will be used to liquidate this liability. E. Ultimate Responsibility for Debt All general obligation bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the City. -50- NOTE 7—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS Employees of the City participate in three defined benefit pension plans. Two of the plans are state-wide cost-sharing, multiple-employer defined benefit pension plans administered by the PERA of Minnesota: the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF). The third is a single-employer defined benefit pension plan administered through the Farmington Fire Fighters' Relief Association (the Association). The details of the City's participation in each of these plans are presented later in these notes. The following table summarizes the impact of these plans on the City's government-wide financial statements: State-Wide PERA Pension Plans Farmington Fire Relief Total GERF PEPFF Total Association All Plans Net pension asset $ — $ — $ — $ 623,559 $ 623,559 Deferred outflows $ 1,984,178 $ 7,061,108 $ 9,045,286 $ 565,201 $ 9,610,487 Net pension liability $ 4,733,671 $ 9,752,013 $ 14,485,684 $ — $ 14,485,684 Deferred inflows $ 685,560 $ 1,169,428 $ 1,854,988 $ 141,510 $ 1,996,498 Pension revenue $ 18,446 $ 21,870 $ 40,316 $ 137,915 $ 178,231 Pension expense $ 575,587 $ 1,700,079 $ 2,275,666 $ 97,176 $ 2,372,842 NOTE 8—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS—STATE-WIDE A. Plan Description The City participates in the following cost-sharing, multiple-employer defined benefit pension plans administered by the PERA of Minnesota. The PERA's defined benefit pension plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. The PERA's defined benefit pension plans are tax-qualified plans under Section 401(a)of the Internal Revenue Code. 1. General Employees Retirement Fund(GERF) All full-time and certain part-time employees of the City are covered by the GERF. GERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. The Basic Plan was closed to new members in 1967.All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. 2. Public Employees Police and Fire Fund(PEPFF) PEPFF, originally established for police officers and firefighters not covered by a local relief association, now covers all police officers and firefighters hired since 1980. Effective July 1, 1999, the PEPFF also covers police officers and firefighters belonging to local relief associations that elected to merge with and transfer assets and administration to the PERA. B. Benefits Provided • The PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are established by state statute and can only be modified by the State Legislature. Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. Increases are related to the funding ratio of the plan. Members in plans that are at least 90.0 percent funded for two consecutive years are given 2.5 percent increases.Members in plans that have not exceeded 90.0 percent funded, or have fallen below 80.0 percent,are given 1.0 percent increases. -51- NOTE 8—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS—STATE-WIDE(CONTINUED) The benefit provisions stated in the following paragraphs of this section are current provisions and apply to active plan participants.Vested,terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. 1. GERF Benefits Benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for the PERA's Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The retiring member receives the higher of a step-rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2 percent of average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 2.7 percent for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for a Coordinated Plan member is 1.2 percent of average salary for each of the first 10 years and 1.7 percent for each remaining year.Under Method 2,the annuity accrual rate is 2.7 percent of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7 percent for Coordinated Plan members for each year of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90 and normal retirement age is 65. For members hired on or after July 1, 1989, normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at age 66. 2. PEPFF Benefits Benefits for PEPFF members first hired after June 30, 2010, but before July 1, 2014, vest on a prorated basis from 50 percent after five years up to 100 percent after 10 years of credited service. Benefits for PEPFF members first hired after June 30, 2014, vest on a prorated basis from 50 percent after 10 years up to 100 percent after 20 years of credited service. The annuity accrual rate is 3 percent of average salary for each year of service. For PEPFF members who were first hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal at least 90. C. Contributions Minnesota Statute, Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. Contribution rates can only be modified by the State Legislature. 1. GERF Contributions Basic Plan members and Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 9.10 percent and 6.50 percent, respectively, of their annual covered salary in calendar year 2016. The City was required to contribute 11.78 percent of pay for Basic Plan members and 7.50 percent for Coordinated Plan members in calendar year 2016. The City's contributions to the GERF for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $279,774. The City's contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. 2. PEPFF Contributions Plan members were required to contribute 10.8 percent of their annual covered salary in calendar year 2016. The City was required to contribute 16.2 percent of pay for PEPFF members in calendar year 2016. The City's regular contributions to the PEPFF for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $384,033. The City's contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. -52- NOTE 8—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS—STATE-WIDE(CONTINUED) D. Pension Costs 1. GERF Pension Costs At December 31, 2016, the City reported a liability of$4,733,671 for its proportionate share of the GERF's net pension liability. The City's net pension liability reflected a reduction due to the state of Minnesota's contribution of$6 million to the fund in 2016. The state of Minnesota is considered a non-employer contributing entity and the state of Minnesota's contribution meets the definition of a special funding situation. The state of Minnesota's proportionate share of the net pension liability associated with the City totaled$61,864. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2016, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City's proportion of the net pension liability was based on the City's contributions received by the PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of the PERA's participating employers. At June 30, 2016, the City's proportionate share was 0.0583 percent, which was a decrease of 0.0040 percent from its proportion measured as of June 30,2015. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the City recognized pension expense of$557,141 for its proportionate share of the GERF's pension expense. In addition, the City recognized an additional $18,446 as pension expense(and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the state of Minnesota's contribution of$6 million to the GERF. At December 31, 2016,the City reported its proportionate share of the GERF's deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: Deferred Deferred Outflows Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences between expected and actual economic experience $ — $ 391,508 Changes in actuarial assumptions 926,857 — Differences between projected and actual investment earnings 913,190 — Changes in proportion — 294,052 Contributions paid to the PERA subsequent to the measurement date 144,131- — Total $ 1.984,178 $ 685,560 Deferred outflows of resources reported $144,131 related to pensions resulting from city contributions subsequent to the measurement date that will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ending December 31, 2017. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Pension Year Ending Expense December 31, Amount 2017 $ 286,650 2018 $ 286,650 2019 $ 410,198 2020 $ 170,989 -53- NOTE 8—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS—STATE-WIDE(CONTINUED) 2. PEPFF Pension Costs At December 31, 2016, the City reported a liability of$9,752,013 for its proportionate share of the PEPFF's net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2016, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City's proportion of the net pension liability was based on the City's contributions received by the PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of the PERA's participating employers. At June 30, 2016, the City's proportion was .2430 percent, which was a decrease of.0020 percent from its proportion measured as of June 30,2015. For the year ended December 31,2016,the City recognized pension expense of$1,678,209 for its proportionate share of the PEPFF's pension expense. The City also recognized $21,870 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as pension expense (and an offsetting reduction of net pension liability) for its proportionate share of the state of Minnesota's on-behalf contributions to the PEPFF. In 2013, legislation passed and required the state of Minnesota to begin contributing $9 million to the PEPFF each year,starting in fiscal year 2014. At December 31,2016,the City reported its proportionate share of the PEPFF's deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: Deferred Deferred Outflows Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences between expected and actual economic experience $ — $ 1,121,689 Changes in actuarial assumptions 5,366,959 — Differences between projected and actual investment earnings 1,491,193 — Changes in proportion — 47,739 Contributions paid to the PERA subsequent to the measurement date 202,956 — Total $ 7,061,108 $ 1,169,428 Deferred outflows of resources reported $202,956 related to pensions resulting from city contributions subsequent to the measurement date that will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ending December 31, 2017. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Pension Year Ending Expense December 31, Amount 2017 $ 1,223,122 2018 $ 1,223,122 2019 $ 1,223,122 2020 $ 1,101,865 2021 $ 917,493 -54- NOTE 8—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS—STATE-WIDE(CONTINUED) E. Actuarial Assumptions The total pension liability in the June 30, 2016 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions: Inflation 2.50%per year Active member payroll growth 3.25%per year Investment rate of return 7.50% Salary increases were based on a service-related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees, survivors, and disabilitants were based on RP-2014 tables for the GERF and RP-2000 tables for the PEPFF for males or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments. Cost of living benefit increases for retirees are assumed to be: 1 percent per year for all future years for the GERF and the PEPFF. Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2016 valuation were based on the results of actuarial experience studies. The most recent four-year experience study in the GERF was completed in 2015. The experience study for the PEPFF was for the period July 1,2004 through June 30, 2009. There following changes in actuarial assumptions occurred in 2016: 1. GERF • The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. • The assumed investment return was changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. The single discount rate was changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. • Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases,payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation. 2. PEPFF • The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2037 and 2.50 percent thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. • The assumed investment return was changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. The single discount rate changed from 7.90 percent to 5.60 percent. • The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation. -55- NOTE 8—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS—STATE-WIDE(CONTINUED) The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of the PERA, prepares an analysis of the reasonableness of the long-term expected rate of return on a regular basis using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce an expected long-term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of geometric real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Long-Term Target Expected Asset Class Allocation Real Rate of Return Domestic stocks 45% 5.50% International stocks 15% 6.00% Bonds 18% 1.45% Alternative assets 20% 6.40% Cash 2% 0.50% F. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability in 2016 was 7.5 percent, a reduction from the 7.9 percent used in 2015. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that employee and employer contributions will be made at the rate specified in statute. Based on these assumptions, fiduciary net position of the GERF was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. In the PEPFF,the fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members through June 30, 2056. Beginning in fiscal year ended June 30, 2057, when projected benefit payments exceed the funds' projected fiduciary net position,benefit payments will be discounted at the municipal bond rate of 2.85 percent based on an index of 20-year general obligation bonds with an average AA credit rating at the measurement date. An equivalent single discount rate of 5.60 percent was determined that produced approximately the same present value of projected benefits when applied to all years of projected benefits as the present value of projected benefits using 7.50 percent applied to all years of projected benefits through the point of asset depletion and 2.85 percent after. -56- NOTE 8—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS—STATE-WIDE(CONTINUED) G. Pension Liability Sensitivity The following presents the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability for all plans it participates in,calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph,as well as what the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current discount rate: 1%Decrease in 1%Increase in Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate 6.50% 7.50% 8.50% The City's proportionate share of the GERF net pension liability $ 6,723,215 $ 4,733,671 $ 3,094,828 1%Decrease in 1%Increase in Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate 4.60% 5.60% 6.60% The City's proportionate share of the PEPFF net pension liability $ 13,651,524 $ 9,752,013 $ 6,565,816 H. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position Detailed information about each pension plan's fiduciary net position is available in a separately issued PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. That report may be obtained on the PERA website at www.mnpera.org. NOTE 9—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN—FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION A. Plan Description Volunteer firefighters of the City of Farmington Fire Department (the Department) are members of the Association, which administers a single-employer defined benefit pension plan established to provide benefits for its members. The plan is established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Chapter 69. The Association is governed by a Board of nine trustees; six voting trustees elected by the members of the Association, and the City's mayor, city administrator, and fire chief as ex-officio members. As of December 31, 2015, the plan covered 44 active firefighters and 3 vested terminated firefighters whose pension benefits are deferred. The Association maintains a separate Special Fund to accumulate assets to fund the retirement benefits earned by the Department's membership. B. Benefits Provided A firefighter who completes at least 20 years as an active member of the Department is entitled, after age 50,to a full service pension upon retirement. -57- NOTE 9—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN—FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION (CONTINUED) The bylaws of the Association also provide for an early vested service pension for a retiring member who has completed fewer than 20 years of service. The reduced pension, available to members with 10 years of service, shall be equal to 60 percent of the pension as described by the bylaws. This percentage increases 4 percent per year so that at 20 years of service, the full amount prescribed is paid. Members who retire with less than 20 years of service and have reached the age of 50 and have completed at least 10 years of active membership are entitled to a reduced service pension not to exceed the amount calculated by multiplying the member's service pension for the completed years of service times the applicable non-forfeitable percentage of pension. C. Contributions Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 424 and 424A authorize pension benefits for volunteer fire relief associations. The plan is funded by fire state aid, investment earnings, and, if necessary, employer contributions as specified in Minnesota Statutes and voluntary city contributions (if applicable). The firefighters have no obligation to contribute to the plan.Nonemployer pension contributions include state aid from the state of Minnesota and municipal contributions from the City. On-behalf of state aid payments from the state of Minnesota are received initially by the City and subsequently remitted to the Association. These on-behalf of state aid payments in addition to the City's municipal contribution payments to the Association plan are recognized as revenues and expenditures in the City's General Fund during the period received. The state of Minnesota contributed$141,510 in fire state aid to the plan on behalf of the Department for the year ended December 31, 2016, which was recorded as revenue. Required employer contributions are calculated annually based on statutory provisions. The City's statutorily-required contributions to the plan for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $0; however, the City made a voluntary contribution of $150,000 to the plan. D. Pension Costs At December 31,2016,the City reported a net pension liability(asset)of($623,559)for the plan. The net pension liability (asset) was measured as of December 31, 2015. The total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability (asset) in accordance with GASB Statement No. 68 was determined by applying an actuarial formula to specific census data certified by the Department as of December 31, 2015. -58- NOTE 9—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN—FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION (CONTINUED) The following table presents the changes in net pension liability(asset)during the year: Total Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Pension Liability Net Position Liability(Asset) (a) (b) (a-b) Beginning balance—January 1,2016 $ 1,552,418 $ 2,214,119 $ (661,701) Changes for the year Service cost 71,190 — 71,190 Interest 92,788 — 92,788 Changes of assumptions 116,780 — 116,780 Contributions(state and local) — 291,915 (291,915) Net investment income — (33,543) 33,543 Benefit payments (596,137) (596,137) — Administrative costs — (15,756) 15,756 Total net changes (315,379) (353,521) 38,142 Ending balance—December 31,2016 $ 1,237,039 $ 1,860,598 $ (623,559) For the year ended December 31, 2016, the City recognized pension revenue of$137,915 and pension expense of$97,176. At December 31, 2016, the City reported deferred inflows of resources and deferred outflows of resources, its contributions subsequent to the measurement date, related to pension from the following sources: Deferred Deferred Outflows Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences between projected and actual investment earnings $ 167,605 $ — Changes in actuarial assumptions 106,086 — City contributions subsequent to the measurement date 150,000 — State aid to the City subsequent to the measurement date - 141,510 141,510 Total $ 565,201 $ 141,510 Deferred outflows of resources totaling$291,510 related to pensions resulting from city contributions to the plan subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ending December 31, 2017. Deferred inflows of resources totaling $141,510 related to state aid received subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized for its impact on the net pension liability in the year ending December 31, 2017. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to the plan will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Pension Year Ending Expense December 31, Amount 2017 $ 55,395 2018 $ 55,395 2019 $ 55,397 2020 $ 44,194 2021 $ 10,694 Thereafter $ 52,616 -59- NOTE 9—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN—FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION (CONTINUED) E. Actuarial Assumptions The total pension liability at December 31,2015 was determined using the entry age normal actuarial cost method and the following actuarial assumptions: Retirement eligibility at 100 percent service pension at age 50 with 20 years of service,early vested retirement at age 50 with 10 years of service vested at 60 percent and increased by 4 percent for each additional year of service up to 20 and eligibility for deferred service pension payable at age 50 with 20 years of service Inflation rate 2.75%per year Investment rate of return 6.25% 20-year municipal bond yield 3.57°A The assumed investment return and single discount rate were both changed from 7.00 percent to 6.25 percent in 2015. The 6.25 percent long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best estimates for expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of inflation) were developed for each asset class using the plan's target investment allocation along with long-term return expectations by asset class. Inflation expectations were applied to derive the nominal rate of return for the portfolio. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Long-Term Long-Term Target Expected Real Expected Nominal Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return Rate of Return Domestic equity 50.12 % 5.52 % 8.27 % International equity 15.55 5.78 % 8.53 % Fixed income 17.28 2.12 % 4.87 % Real estate and alternatives 0.86 4.12 % 6.87 % Cash and equivalents 16.19 0.82 % 3.57 % Total 100.00 % 6.25 % F. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 6.25 percent. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions to the plan will be made as specified in the state statute. Based on that assumption and considering the funding ratio of the plan, the fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. -60- NOTE 9—DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN—FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION (CONTINUED) G. Pension Liability(Asset)Sensitivity The following presents the City's net pension liability (asset) for the plan, calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well as what the City's net pension liability (asset)would be if it were calculated using a discount rate 1 percent lower or 1 percent higher than the current discount rate: 1%Decrease Current 1%Increase (5.25%) (6.25%) (7.25%) Net pension liability(asset) $ (565,816) $ (623,559) $ (678,970) H. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position The Association issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. The report may be obtained by writing to the Farmington Fire Fighters' Relief Association,403 Third Street,Farmington,Minnesota 55024,or by calling(651)280-6880. NOTE 10—OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS(OPER)PLAN A. Plan Description The City provides post-employment benefits to certain eligible employees through the City's OPEB Plan, a single-employer defined benefit plan administered by the City. All post-employment benefits are based on contractual agreements with employee groups. These contractual agreements do not include any specific contribution or funding requirements. The plan does not issue a publicly available financial report.These benefits are summarized as follows: Post-Employment Insurance Benefits —All retirees of the City have the option under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage through the City from the time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of eligibility for Medicare. For members of all employee groups,the retiree must pay the full premium to continue coverage for medical and dental insurance. The City is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees, whether the premiums are paid by the City or the retiree. Consequently, participating retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as an "implicit rate subsidy." This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more favorable premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if purchasing insurance on their own, due to being included in the same pool with the City's younger and statistically healthier active employees. B. Funding Policy The required contribution is based on projected pay-as-you-go financing requirements, with additional amounts to pre-fund benefits as determined annually by the City. -61- NOTE 10=OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS(OPEB)PLAN(CONTINUED) C. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation The City's annual OPEB cost(expense)is calculated based on the annual required contributions(ARC)of the City. The City has elected to calculate the ARC and related information using the alternative measurement method permitted by GASB Statement No. 45 for employers in plans with fewer than 100 total plan members. The ARC represents a level funding that,if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal costs each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities(or funding excess)over a period not to exceed 30 years. The annual OPEB cost is accrued in the accrual based statements. The liability is funded through payments from the City's General Fund and enterprise funds. The following table shows the components of the City's annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and the changes in the City's net OPEB obligation to the plan: ARC $ 96,555 Interest on net OPEB obligation 35,448 Adjustment to ARC (30,751) Annual OPEB cost(expense) 101,252 Contributions made (3,512) Increase in net OPEB obligation 97,740 Net OPEB obligation—beginning of year 787,735 Net OPEB obligation—end of year $ 885,475 The City's annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation for the past three years are as follows: Fiscal Percentage of Year Ended Annual Employer Annual OPEB Net OPEB December 31, OPEB Cost Contribution Cost Contributed Obligation 2014 $ 100,652 $ 10,103 10.04% $ 697,588 2015 $ 104,831 $ 14,684 14.01% $ 787,735 2016 $ 101,252 $ 3,512 3.47% $ 885,475 D. Funded Status and Funding Progress As of January 1, 2016,the most recent actuarial valuation date,the actuarial accrued liability for benefits and unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) were both $976,126, as the plan was unfunded. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan)was $5,487,000 and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 17.8 percent. Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and the ARC of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The Schedule of Funding Progress following the notes to basic financial statements presents multi-year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. -62- NOTE 10-OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS(OPEB)PLAN(CONTINUED) E. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members)and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets,consistent with the long-term perspective of the calculations. In the January 1, 2016 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method was used. The actuarial assumptions included a 4.50 percent discount rate and an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 9.00 percent initially reduced incrementally to an ultimate rate of 5.00 percent after 12 years. Both rates included a 2.75 percent inflation assumption. The UAAL is being amortized at an increasing 3.50 percent per year of projected payroll on an open basis. The remaining amortization period at January 1, 2016 was 30 years. NOTE 11-FUND BALANCES A. Classifications At December 31,2016,the City had the following governmental fund balances: Debt Permanent Service State Aid Storm Water Improvement General Fund Fund Construction Trunk Revolving Maintenance Nonmajor Total Nonspendable Prepaid items $ 33,762 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 110 $ 33,872 Restricted Debt service - 16,663,140 - - - - - 16,663,140 Police programs - - - - - - 14,336 14,336 Park improvements - - - - - - 140,616 140,616 PEG fees - - - - - - 130,804 - 130,804 Recreational capital projects - - - - - - 10,254 10,254 Total restricted - 16,663,140 - - - - 296,010 16,959,150 Committed Street construction - - 396,538 - - - - 396,538 Storni water trunk - - - 2,603,763 - - - 2,603,763 Improvement projects - - - - 151,184 - 52,075 203,259 Park improvements - - - - - - 149,601 149,601 Ice arena - - - - - - 79,913 79,913 Sanitary sewer hunk - - - - - - 397,096 397,096 Cable communications - - - - - - 617,830 617,830 Fire capital programs - - - - - - 356,685 356,685 Pavement management - - - - - 136,382 - 136,382 Capital equipment - - - - - - 217,761 217,761 Total committed - - 396,538 2,603,763 151,184 136,382 1,870,961 5,158,828 Unassigned 5,031,529 - - - - - - 5,031,529 Total $ 5,065,291 $ 16,663,140 $ 396,538 $ 2,603,763 $ 151,184 $ 136,382 $ 2,167,081 $ 27,183,379 B. Minimum Fund Balance Policy The City's policy is to maintain an unassigned fund balance in the General Fund in the range of 40.0-50.0 percent of the subsequent year's budgeted expenditures and transfers out. At December 31, 2016, the unassigned fund balance of the General Fund was 41.2 percent of the subsequent year's budgeted expenditures and transfers out. -63- NOTE 11—FUND BALANCES(CONTINUED) C. Deficit Fund Balances At December 31, 2016, the Trident Housing Tax Increment Special Revenue Fund of the Economic Development Authority(EDA) (discretely presented component unit) has a fund balance deficit of$827. This deficit will be eliminated by a transfer from the EDA General Fund. NOTE 12—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES A. Federal and State Funding Amounts recorded or receivable from federal and state agencies are subject to agency audit and adjustment. Any disallowed claims, including amounts already collected, may constitute a liability of the applicable funds. The amount, if any, of claims which may be disallowed by the grantor agencies cannot be determined at this time,although the City expects such amounts, if any,to be immaterial. B. Legal Claims The City has the usual and customary type of miscellaneous legal claims pending at year-end. Although the outcome of these lawsuits is not presently determinable,the City's management believes that the City will not incur any material monetary loss resulting from these claims. No loss has been recorded on the City's financial statements relating to these claims. C. Tax Increment Districts The City's tax increment districts are subject to review by the Minnesota Office of the State Auditor. Any disallowed claims or misuse of tax increments could become a liability of the applicable fund. Management has indicated that it's not aware of any instances of noncompliance, which would have a material effect on the financial statements. -64- REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION CITY OF FARMINGTON PERA—General Employees Retirement Fund Schedule of City's and Non-Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability Proportionate Share of the City's Net Pension Proportionate Liability and City's Share of the the City's Proportionate Plan Fiduciary State of Share of the Share of the Net Position City's City's Minnesota's State of Net Pension as a PERA Fiscal Proportion Proportionate Proportionate Minnesota's Liability as a Percentage Year-End Date of the Net Share of the Share of the Share of the City's Percentage of of the Total City Fiscal (Measurement Pension Net Pension Net Pension Net Pension Covered Covered Pension Year-End Date Date) Liability Liability Liability Liability Payroll Payroll Liability 12/31/2015 06/30/2015 0.0623% $ 3,228,709 $ — $ 3,228,709 $ 3,660,794 88.20% 78.20% 12/31/2016 06/30/2016 0.0583% $ 4,733,671 $ 61,864 $ 4,795,535 $ 3,618,268 130.83% 68.90% PERA—General Employees Retirement Fund Schedule of City Contributions Contributions Contributions in Relation to as a Statutorily the Statutorily Contribution Percentage City Fiscal Required Required Deficiency Covered of Covered Year-End Date Contributions Contributions (Excess) Payroll Payroll 12/31/2015 $ 271,726 $ 271,726 $ — $ 3,623,009 7.50% 12/31/2016 $ 279,774 $ 279,774 $ — $ 3,730,581 7.50% Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions.On January 1,2015,the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the GERF,which increased the total pension liability by $1.1 billion and increased the fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer contributions were revised. Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions.(1)2015 Changes—The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter.(2)2016 Changes—The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years.The assumed investment return was changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent.The single discount rate was changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent.Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30,2015.The assumed future salary increases,payroll growth,and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation. Note 3: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30,2015 measurement date). This information is not available for previous fiscal years. -65- CITY OF FARMINGTON PERA—Public Employees Police and Fire Fund Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability City's Proportionate Plan Fiduciary Share of the Net Position City's City's Net Pension as a PERA Fiscal Proportion Proportionate Liability as a Percentage Year-End Date of the Net Share of the City's Percentage of of the Total City Fiscal (Measurement Pension Net Pension Covered Covered Pension Year-End Date Date) Liability Liability Payroll Payroll Liability 12/31/2015 06/30/2015 0.2450% $ 2,783,773 $ 2,242,616 124.13% 86.60% 12/31/2016 06/30/2016 0.2430% $ 9,752,013 $ 2,344,593 415.94% 63.90% PERA—Public Employees Police and Fire Fund Schedule of City Contributions Contributions Contributions in Relation to as a Statutorily the Statutorily Contribution Percentage City Fiscal Required Required Deficiency Covered of Covered Year-End Date Contributions Contributions (Excess) Payroll Payroll 12/31/2015 $ 374,503 $ 374,503 $ — $ 2,311,741 16.20% 12/31/2016 $ 384,033 $ 384,033 $ — $ 2,370,262 16.20% Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions. The post-retirement benefit increase to be paid after attainment of the 90.0 percent funding threshold was changed,from inflation up to 2.5 percent,to a fixed rate of 2.5 percent. Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions. (1) 2015 Changes—The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.0 percent per year through 2037 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (2) 2016 Changes — The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2037 and 2.50 percent thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years.The assumed investment return was changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent.The single discount rate was changed from 7.90 percent to 5.60 percent.The assumed future salary increases,payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation. Note 3: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This information is not available for previous fiscal years. -66- CITY OF FARMINGTON Farmington Fire Fighters'Relief Association Schedule of Changes in the Relief Association's Net Pension Liability(Asset)and Related Ratios City fiscal year-end dated December 31, 2015 2016 Farmington Fire Fighters'Relief Association year-end dated(measurement date)December 31, 2014 2015 Total pension liability Service cost $ 69,285 $ 71,190 Interest 110,249 92,788 Changes of assumptions — 116,780 Benefit payments (265,643) (596,137) Net change in total pension liability (86,109) (315,379) Total pension liability—beginning of year 1,638,527 1,552,418 Total pension liability—end of year $ 1,552,418 $ 1,237,039 Plan fiduciary net position Contributions(state and local) $ 283,461 $ 291,915 Net investment income 84,277 (33,543) Benefit payments (265,643) (596,137) Administrative costs (10,848) (15,756) Net change in plan fiduciary net position 91,247 (353,521) Plan fiduciary net position—beginning of year 2,122,872 2,214,119 Plan fiduciary net position—end of year $ 2,214,119 $ 1,860,598 Net pension liability(asset)—ending $ (661,701) $ (623,559) Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability 142.62% 150.41% Note: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a December 31, 2014 measurement date). This information is not available for previous fiscal years. -67- CITY OF FARMINGTON Farmington Fire Fighters'Relief Association Schedule of City Contributions Contributions in Relation to the Statutorily Statutorily Contribution Voluntary City Fiscal Required Required Deficiency City Year-End Date Contributions(a) Contributions(b) (Excess)(a-b) Contribution 12/31/2015 $ — $ — $ — $ 150,000 12/31/2016 $ — $ — $ — $ 150,000 Note: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a December 31, 2014 measurement date). This information is not available for previous fiscal years. -68- CITY OF FARMINGTON Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan Schedule of Funding Progress Unfunded Unfunded Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Liability as a Valuation Date Accrued Value of Accrued Funded Covered Percentage of January 1, Liability Plan Assets Liability Ratio Payroll Payroll 2013 $ 886,732 $ — $ 886,732 — % $ 5,740,759 15.1% 2014 $ 822,299 $ — $ 822,299 — % $ 5,332,090 15.4% 2016 $ 976,126 $ — $ 976,126 — % $ 5,487,000 17.8% -69- SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS The statements that follow are to provide further detail and support additional analysis for the City's nonmajor special revenue and capital projects funds. -70- CITY OF FARMINGTON Nonmajor Governmental Funds Combining Balance Sheet as of December 31,2016 Special Capital Revenue Projects Total Assets Cash and investments $ 328,854 $ 2,007,655 $ 2,336,509 Receivables Accounts 81,719 96,992 178,711 Interest 744 4,349 5,093 Special assessments Noncurrent 273 932 1,205 Prepaid items 110 — 110 Total assets $ 411,700 $ 2,109,928 $ 2,521,628 Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ 20,836 $ 14,147 $ 34,983 Deposits payable 5,846 312,344 318,190 Due to other governments 169 — 169 Total liabilities 26,851 326,491 353,342 Deferred inflows of resources Unavailable revenue—special assessments 273 932 1,205 Fund balances Nonspendable 110 — 110 Restricted 154,952 141,058 296,010 Committed 229,514 1,641,447 1,870,961 Total fund balances 384,576 1,782,505 2,167,081 Total liabilities,deferred inflows of resources,and fund balances $ 411,700 $ 2,109,928 $ 2,521,628 -71- CITY OF FARMINGTON Nonmajor Governmental Funds Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenditures,and Changes in Fund Balances Year Ended December 31,2016 Special Capital Revenue Projects Total Revenue Franchise taxes $ - $ 175,691 $ 175,691 Special assessments 300 1,727 2,027 Intergovernmental 50,000 - 50,000 Charges for services 321,030 96,664 417,694 Investment earnings 3,874 21,844 25,718 Other Donations 11,497 94,459 105,956 Rentals 7,088 - 7,088 Miscellaneous 69,470 - 69,470 Total revenues 463,259 390,385 853,644 Expenditures Current Public safety 5,763 24,786 30,549 Public works - 64,750 64,750 Parks and recreation 319,003 4,231 323,234 Capital outlay General government - 82,488 82,488 Public safety - 371,331 371,331 Public works - 22,096 22,096 Parks and recreation 74,977 174,298 249,275 Total expenditures 399,743 743,980 1,143,723 Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures 63,516 (353,595) (290,079) Other financing sources(uses) Sale of capital assets 2,537 10,506 13,043 Transfers in 55,013 654,366 709,379 Transfers out (60,000) - (60,000) Total other financing sources(uses) (2,450) 664,872 662,422 Net change in fund balances 61,066 311,277 372,343 Fund balances Beginning of year 323,510 1,471,228 1,794,738 End of year $ 384,576 $ 1,782,505 $ 2,167,081 -72- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Nonmajor special revenue funds are used to account for the proceeds of certain specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes. Nonmajor special revenue funds presently established are as follows: Police Donations and Forfeitures — Used to account for the operations and activities related to donations and the forfeiture of confiscated property and allows for the expenditure of those revenues for expenses related to the public safety of the City. Park Improvement—Used to account for the operations and activities related to the collection of park dedication fees and other revenues earmarked for construction and improvement of the City's park and trail system. Arena(Ice)—Used to account for the operation of the City's ice arena; one sheet of indoor ice for use by hockey and figure skating groups,both school and youth organizations supported. -73- CITY OF FARMINGTON Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Combining Balance Sheet as of December 31,2016 Police Donations Park and Forfeitures Improvement Arena Total Assets Cash and investments $ 17,154 $ 291,587 $ 20,113 $ 328,854 Receivables Accounts - - 81,719 81,719 Interest 37 637 70 744 Special assessments Noncurrent - 273 - 273 Prepaid items - - 110 110 Total assets $ 17,191 $ 292,497 $ 102,012 $ 411,700 Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ 2,855 $ 2,007 $ 15,974 $ 20,836 Deposits payable - - 5,846 5,846 Due to other governments - - 169 169 Total liabilities 2,855 2,007 21,989 26,851 Deferred inflows of resources Unavailable revenue-special assessments - 273 - 273 Fund balances Nonspendable - - 110 110 Restricted for police programs 14,336 - - 14,336 Restricted for park improvements - 140,616 - 140,616 Committed for park improvements - 149,601 - 149,601 Committed for ice arena capital - - 79,913 79,913 Total fund balances 14,336 290,217 80,023 384,576 Total liabilities,deferred inflows of resources,and fund balances $ 17,191 $ 292,497 $ 102,012 $ 411,700 -74- CITY OF FARMINGTON Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Year Ended December 31,2016 Police Donations Park and Forfeitures Improvement Arena Total Revenues Special assessments $ - $ 300 $ - $ 300 Intergovernmental - 50,000 - 50,000 Charges for services - - 321,030 321,030 Investment earnings 165 3,028 681 3,874 Other Donations 6,497 - 5,000 11,497 Rentals - 7,088 - 7,088 Miscellaneous - 66,054 3,416 69,470 Total revenues 6,662 126,470 330,127 463,259 Expenditures Current Public safety 5,763 - - 5,763 Parks and recreation - 2,006 316,997 319,003 Capital outlay Parks and recreation - 74,977 - 74,977 Total expenditures 5,763 76,983 316,997 399,743 Excess of revenues over expenditures 899 49,487 13,130 63,516 Other financing sources(uses) Sale of capital assets 1,237 1,300 - 2,537 Transfers in - 55,013 - 55,013 Transfers out - (50,000) (10,000) (60,000) Total other financing sources(uses) 1,237 6,313 (10,000) (2,450) Net change in fund balances 2,136 55,800 3,130 61,066 Fund balances Beginning of year 12,200 234,417 76,893 323,510 End of year $ 14,336 $ 290,217 $ 80,023 $ 384,576 -75- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Nonmajor capital projects funds are maintained to account for financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditures for capital outlays. Projects are financed through the issuance of debt, special assessments,tax levies,dedicated fees, and intergovernmental aids or grants. Nonmajor capital projects funds presently established are as follows: Sanitary Sewer Trunk—Used to account for the operations and activities dedicated to the construction and improvement of sanitary sewer trunk facilities in the City. Cable Communications—Used to account for the operations and activities related to the provision of cable communications for public access. Fire—Used to account for the operations and activities related to fire capital projects and donations to the fire department. Private— Used to account for the operations and activities related to engineering and administrative fees related to new development in the City. Recreation—Used to account for the operations and activities related to capital improvements to the City-owned recreation facilities, such as, the senior center, ice arena and swimming pool, and donations to these activities. General Capital Equipment—This fund is used to account for the operations and activities related to the City's general capital equipment. -76- CITY OF FARMINGTON Nonmajor Capital Projects Funds Combining Balance Sheet as of December 31,2016 Sanitary Fire Sewer Cable Capital Trunk Communications Projects Assets Cash and investments $ 396,230 $ 688,560 $ 367,991 Receivables Accounts — 74,137 — Interest 866 1,504 789 Special assessments Noncurrent 663 — — Total assets $ 397,759 $ 764,201 $ 368,780 Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ — $ 23 $ 12,095 Deposits payable — 15,544 Total liabilities — 15,567 12,095 Deferred inflows of resources Unavailable revenue—special assessments 663 — — Fund balances Restricted for public,educational,and governmental fees — 130,804 — Restricted for recreational capital projects — — — Committed for sanitary sewer trunk 397,096 — — Committed for cable communications — 617,830 — Committed for fire capital programs — — 356,685 Committed for improvement projects — — — Committed for capital equipment — — — Total fund balances 397,096 748,634 356,685 Total liabilities,deferred inflows of resources,and fund balances $ 397,759 $ 764,201 $ 368,780 -77- Private Recreation General Capital Capital Capital Projects Projects Equipment Total $ 309,646 $ 26,875 $ 218,353 $ 2,007,655 21,895 - 960 96,992 676 37 477 4,349 269 - - 932 $ 332,486 $ 26,912 $ 219,790 $ 2,109,928 $ - $ - $ 2,029 $ 14,147 296,800 - - 312,344 296,800 - 2,029 326,491 269 - - 932 - - - 130,804 10,254 - 10,254 - - - 397,096 - - - 617,830 - - - 356,685 35,417 16,658 - 52,075 - - 217,761 217,761 35,417 26,912 217,761 1,782,505 $ 332,486 $ 26,912 $ 219,790 $ 2,109,928 -78- CITY OF FARMINGTON Nonmajor Capital Projects Funds Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Year Ended December 31,2016 Sanitary Fire Sewer Cable Capital Trunk Communications Projects Revenues Franchise taxes $ — $ 175,691 $ — Special assessments 884 — — Intergovernmental Charges for services 74,448 355 — Investment earnings 4,649 7,614 3,262 Other Donations — — 54,744 Total revenues 79,981 183,660 58,006 Expenditures Current Public safety — — 24,635 Public works 64,750 — — Parks and recreation — — — Capital outlay General government — 82,488 — Public safety — — 232,114 Public works — — — Parks and recreation — — — Total expenditures 64,750 82,488 256,749 Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures 15,231 101,172 (198,743) Other financing sources Sale of capital assets — 212 1,420 Transfers in — — 309,513 Total other financing sources — 212 310,933 Net change in fund balances 15,231 101,384 112,190 Fund balances Beginning of year 381,865 647,250 244,495 End of year $ 397,096 $ 748,634 $ 356,685 -79- Private Recreation General Capital Capital Capital Projects Projects Equipment Total $ - $ - $ - $ 175,691 843 - - 1,727 21,861 - - 96,664 3,834 477 2,008 21,844 - 34,465 5,250 94,459 26,538 34,942 7,258 390,385 - - 151 24,786 - - - 64,750 - 4,231 - 4,231 - - - 82,488 - - 139,217 371,331 22,096 - - 22,096 - 174,298 - 174,298 22,096 178,529 139,368 743,980 4,442 (143,587) (132,110) (353,595) - - 8,874 10,506 - 98,121 246,732 654,366 - 98,121 255,606 664,872 4,442 (45,466) 123,496 311,277 30,975 72,378 94,265 1,471,228 $ 35,417 $ 26,912 $ 217,761 $ 1,782,505 -80- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DEBT SERVICE FUND The Debt Service Fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources for the payment of principal and interest on long-term debt obligations other than those issued for and serviced by an enterprise fund. 1995 General Obligation Wastewater Treatment Bonds — The bonds were issued to help finance a wastewater treatment facility. The final payment on these bonds was made in 2016. 2005C General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds — The bonds were issued to finance Fire Station 2. The remaining outstanding bonds were called in 2016. 2007A General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds—The bonds were issued to finance City Hall and the City Garage. The final payment on these bonds will be made in 2017. 2008A&B General Obligation Improvement Bonds — The 2008A bonds were issued for the Elm Street Project and the 2008B bonds were issued for the 195th Street Extension Project. The final payment on these bonds will be made in 2017. 2010A General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bond — The bonds were issued for the refinancing of the Police Station. The final payment on these bonds will be made in 2017. 2010B General Obligation Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds — The bonds were issued for the refinancing of the Maintenance Facility Bonds. 2010C General Obligation Street Construction Bonds — The bonds were issued for the Walnut Street Reconstruction Project. The final payment on these bonds will be made in 2017. 2010D General Obligation Equipment Certificate Bonds—The equipment certificates were issued in conjunction with the Ice Arena Rehabilitation Project. The final payment on these bonds will be made in 2017. 2011A General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds — The bonds were issued for the Main Street Project. 2013A General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds — The bonds were issued to refund the 2005B and 2006A bonds,which were originally issued for the Ash Street,Hill Dee,and Spruce Street Projects. 2013B General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds — The bonds were issued to fund the Akin Park Estates East and West Street Reconstruction Project. 2015A General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds — The bonds were issued to fund the 195th Avenue Street Reconstruction Project. 2016A General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds — The bonds were issued to refund the 2008A&B and 2010C bonds which were originally issued for the Elm Street, 195th Street Extension, and Walnut Street Reconstruction Projects. 2016B General Obligation Capital Improvement Refunding Bonds—The bonds were issued to refund the 2007A bonds which were originally issued to finance City Hall and the City Garage. 2016C General Obligation Capital Improvement Refunding Bonds—The bonds were issued to refund the 2007A bonds which were originally issued to finance City Hall and the City Garage. -81- CITY OF FARMINGTON Debt Service Fund Combining Balance Sheet by Account as of December 31,2016 1995 G.O. 2005C G.O. 2007A G.O. 2010A G.O. 2010B G.O. 2010C G.O. Wastewater Capital Capital 2008A&B G.O. Improvement Utility Revenue Street Treatment Improvement Improvement Improvement Refunding Refunding Construction Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Assets Cash and investments $ — $ — $ 7,065,857 $ 5,491,416 $ 217,684 $ 144,943 $ 1,859,339 Receivables Interest — — 1,280 5,366 52 317 741 Special assessments Delinquent — — — 1,073 — — 853 Noncurrent — — — 1,691,703 — — 181,750 Due from other governments — — — — — — — Total assets $ — $ — $ 7,067,137 $ 7,189,558 $ 217,736 $ 145,260 $ 2,042,683 Liabilities Due to other funds $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Advances from other funds — — — — — — 300,000 Total liabilities — — — — — — 300,000 Deferred inflows of resources Unavailable revenue—special assessments — — — 1,692,776 — — 182,603 Total deferred inflows of resources — — — 1,692,776 — — 182,603 Fund balances Restricted for debt service — — 7,067,137 5,496,782 217,736 145,260 1,560,080 Total liabilities,deferred inflows of resources,and fund balances $ — $ — $ 7,067,137 $ 7,189,558 $ 217,736 $ 145,260 $ 2,042,683 -82- 2016B G.O. 2016C G.O. 2010D G.O. 2011A G.O. 2013A G.O. 2013B G.O. 2015A G.O. 2016A G.O. Capital Capital Equipment Improvement Improvement Street Street Improvement Improvement Improvement Certificate Refunding Refunding Construction Construction Refunding Refunding Refunding Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Total $ 542,601 $ 357,758 $ 930,381 $ 144,745 $ 294,791 $ 380,740 $ 3,645 $ 5,638 $ 17,439,538 72 782 2,033 316 644 7,676 10,604 3,573 33,456 - - 1,506 - - - - - 3,432 - 122,145 432,190 - - - - - 2,427,788 $ 542,673 $ 480,685 $ 1,366,110 $ 145,061 $ 295,435 $ 388,416 $ 14,249 $ 9,211 $ 19,904,214 $ 133,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 133,000 376,854 - - - - - - - 676,854 509,854 - - - - - - - 809,854 - 122,145 433,696 - - - - - 2,431,220 - 122,145 433,696 - - - - - 2,431,220 32,819 358,540 932,414 145,061 295,435 388,416 14,249 9,211 16,663,140 $ 542,673 $ 480,685 $ 1,366,110 $ 145,061 $ 295,435 $ 388,416 $ 14,249 $ 9,211 $ 19,904,214 -83- CITY OF FARMINGTON Debt Service Fund Combining Schedule of Revenues,Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances by Account Year Ended December 31,2016 1995 G.O. 2005C G.O. 2007A G.O. 2010A G.O. 2010B G.O. 2010C G.O. Wastewater Capital Capital 2008A&B G.O. Improvement Utility Revenue Street Treatment Improvement Improvement Improvement Refunding Refunding Construction Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds - Bonds Bonds Bonds Revenues Property taxes $ - $ 166,000 $ 772,348 $ 66,000 $ 393,000 $ - $ - Special assessments - - 4,522 322,490 - - 39,692 Intergovernmental - - - 19,000 - - 181,000 Investment earnings(charges) 45 328 3,019 27,485 (1,838) 1,281 3,131 Total revenues 45 166,328 779,889 434,975 391,162 1,281 223,823 Expenditures Debt service Principal retirement 56,534 1,490,000 435,000 630,000 310,000 100,000 135,000 Interest and fiscal fees 1,309 60,718 295,256 218,098 80,740 21,275 66,272 Total expenditures 57,843 1,550,718 730,256 848,098 390,740 121,275 201,272 Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (57,798) (1,384,390) 49,633 (413,123) 422 (119,994) 22,551 Other financing sources(uses) Transfers in - 1,241,118 - 745,000 193,709 124,552 150,000 Transfers out (1,647) (165) - - - - - Refunding bonds issued - - 6,170,000 2,255,000 - - 1,195,000 Premiums on bonds issued - - 310,000 35,000 - - 25,000 Total other financing sources(uses) (1,647) 1,240,953 6,480,000 3,035,000 193,709 124,552 1,370,000 Net change in fund balances (59,445) (143,437) 6,529,633 2,621,877 194,131 4,558 1,392,551 Fund balances Beginning of year 59,445 143,437 537,504 2,874,905 23,605 140,702 167,529 End of year $ - $ - $ 7,067,137 $ 5,496,782 $ 217,736 $ 145,260 $ 1,560,080 -84- 2016B G.O. 2016C G.O. 2010D G.O. 2011A G.O. 2013A G.O. 2013B G.O. 2015A G.O. 2016A G.O. Capital Capital Equipment Improvement Improvement Street Street Improvement Improvement Improvement Certificate Refunding Refunding Construction Construction Refunding Refunding Refunding Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Total $ 152,000 $ 293,000 $ 477,274 $ 139,000 $ 293,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,752,122 - 29,969 97,426 - - - - - 494,099 - - - - - - - - 200,000 (468) 2,425 6,951 974 1,914 9,281 12,820 4,320 71,668 151,532 325,394 581,651 139,974 295,414 9,281 12,820 4,320 3,517,889 125,000 300,000 670,000 160,000 - - - - 4,411,534 20,462 31,026 89,210 21,185 67,011 44,372 53,119 24,149 1,094,202 145,462 331,026 759,210 181,185 67,011 44,372 53,119 24,149 5,505,736 6,070 (5,632) (177,559) (41,211) 228,403 (35,091) (40,299) (19,829) (1,987,847) - - 219,000 - - 377,000 - - 3,050,379 - - - - - - - - (1,812) - - - - - - - - 9,620,000 - - - - - 46,507 54,548 29,040 500,095 - - 219,000 - - 423,507 54,548 29,040 13,168,662 6,070 (5,632) 41,441 (41,211) 228,403 388,416 14,249 9,211 11,180,815 26,749 364,172 890,973 186,272 67,032 - - - 5,482,325 $ 32,819 $ 358,540 $ 932,414 $ 145,061 $ 295,435 $ 388,416 $ 14,249 $ 9,211 $ 16,663,140 -85- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULES Debt Service Fund State Aid Construction Capital Projects Fund Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects Fund Permanent Improvement Revolving Capital Projects Fund Maintenance Capital Projects Fund Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Police Donations and Forfeitures Park Improvement Arena(Ice) Nonmajor Capital Projects Funds Sanitary Sewer Trunk Cable Communications Fire Private Recreation General Capital Equipment -86- CITY OF FARMINGTON Debt Service Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Property taxes $ 2,733,848 $ 2,752,122 $ 18,274 Special assessments 466,817 494,099 27,282 Intergovernmental 335,000 200,000 (135,000) Investment earnings 24,745 71,668 46,923 Total revenues 3,560,410 3,517,889 (42,521) Expenditures Debt service Principal retirement 4,411,534 4,411,534 — Interest and fiscal fees 997,144 1,094,202 97,058 Total expenditures 5,408,678 5,505,736 97,058 Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (1,848,268) (1,987,847) (139,579) Other financing sources(uses) Transfers in 1,878,552 3,050,379 1,171,827 Transfers out — (1,812) (1,812) Refunding bonds issued — 9,620,000 9,620,000 Premiums on bonds issued — 500,095 500,095 Total other financing sources(uses) 1,878,552 13,168,662 11,290,110 Net change in fund balances $ 30,284 11,180,815 $ 11,150,531 Fund balances Beginning of year 5,482,325 End of year $ 16,663,140 -87- CITY OF FARMINGTON State Aid Construction Capital Projects Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual _Final Budget Revenues Property taxes $ 117,000 $ 117,000 $ — Special assessments 22,312 21,024 (1,288) Investment earnings 13,666 18,688 5,022 Total revenues 152,978 156,712 3,734 Expenditures Capital outlay Public works — 194 194 Excess of revenues over expenditures 152,978 156,518 3,540 Other financing(uses) Transfers out (369,000) (1,491,000) (1,122,000) Net change in fund balances $ (216,022) (1,334,482) $ (1,118,460) Fund balances Beginning of year 1,731,020 End of year $ 396,538 -88- CITY OF FARMINGTON Storm Water Trunk Capital Projects Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Special assessments $ — $ 14,318 $ 14,318 Charges for service — 82,261 82,261 Investment earnings 30,238 59,189 28,951 Total revenues 30,238 155,768 125,530 Expenditures Capital outlay Public works — 163 163 Excess of revenues over expenditures 30,238 155,605 125,367 Other financing(uses) Transfers out (1,385,000) (1,241,118) 143,882 Net change in fund balances $ (1,354,762) (1,085,513) $ 269,249 Fund balances Beginning of year 3,689,276 End of year $ 2,603,763 -89- CITY OF FARMINGTON Permanent Improvement Revolving Capital Projects Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Special assessments $ 15,620 $ 14,309 $ (1,311) Investment earnings 780 1,680 900 Total revenues 16,400 15,989 (411) Expenditures Capital outlay Public works 474 365 (109) Net change in fund balances $ 15,926 15,624 $ (302) Fund balances Beginning of year 135,560 End of year $ 151,184 -90- CITY OF FARMINGTON Maintenance Capital Projects Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Property taxes $ — $ 9,817 $ 9,817 Intergovernmental — 445,964 445,964 Investment earnings 11,631 18,312 6,681 Other — 2,521 2,521 Total revenues 11,631 476,614 464,983 Expenditures Capital outlay Public works 609,000 1,956,889 1,347,889 Parks and recreation 12,500 22,343 9,843 Total expenditures 621,500 1,979,232 1,357,732 Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (609,869) (1,502,618) (892,749) Other financing sources(uses) Transfers in 395,000 680,270 285,270 Transfers out — (10,000) (10,000) Total other financing sources(uses) 395,000 670,270 275,270 Net change in fund balances $ (214,869) (832,348) $ (617,479) Fund balances Beginning of year 968,730 End of year $ 136,382 -91- CITY OF FARMINGTON Police Donations and Forfeitures Special Revenue Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Investment earnings $ 84 $ 165 $ 81 Other Donations — 6,497 6,497 Total revenues 84 6,662 6,578 Expenditures Current Public safety 6,500 5,763 (737) Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (6,416) 899 7,315 Other financing sources Sale of capital assets 5,000 1,237 (3,763) Net change in fund balances $ (1,416) 2,136 $ 3,552 Fund balances Beginning of year 12,200 End of year $ 14,336 -92- CITY OF FARMINGTON Park Improvement Special Revenue Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Special assessments $ 300 $ 300 $ - Intergovernmental - 50,000 50,000 Investment earnings 1,620 3,028 1,408 Other Rentals 7,088 7,088 - Miscellaneous - 66,054 66,054 Total revenues 9,008 126,470 117,462 Expenditures Current Parks and recreation - 2,006 2,006 Capital outlay Parks and recreation 60,000 74,977 14,977 Total expenditures 60,000 76,983 16,983 Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (50,992) 49,487 100,479 Other financing sources(uses) Sale of capital assets - 1,300 1,300 Transfers in 40,000 55,013 15,013 Transfers out - (50,000) (50,000) Total other financing sources(uses) 40,000 6,313 (33,687) Net change in fund balances $ (10,992) 55,800 $ 66,792 Fund balances Beginning of year 234,417 End of year $ 290,217 -93- CITY OF FARMINGTON Arena Special Revenue Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Charges for services $ 315,300 $ 321,030 $ 5,730 Investment earnings 450 681 231 Other Donations 5,000 5,000 — Miscellaneous 1,000 3,416 2,416 Total revenues 321,750 330,127 8,377 Expenditures Current Parks and recreation 317,418 316,997 (421) Excess of revenues over expenditures 4,332 13,130 8,798 Other financing(uses) Transfers out — (10,000) (10,000) Net change in fund balances $ 4,332 3,130 $ (1,202) Fund balances Beginning of year 76,893 End of year $ 80,023 -94- CITY OF FARMINGTON Sanitary Sewer Trunk Capital Projects Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Special assessments $ 5,000 $ 884 $ (4,116) Charges for services 25,000 74,448 49,448 Investment earnings 2,437 4,649 2,212 Total revenues 32,437 79,981 47,544 Expenditures Current Public works — 64,750 64,750 Net change in fund balances $ 32,437 15,231 $ (17,206) Fund balances Beginning of year 381,865 End of year $ 397,096 -95- CITY OF FARMINGTON Cable Communications Capital Projects Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Franchise taxes $ 170,000 $ 175,691 $ 5,691 Charges for service 4,177 355 (3,822) Investment earnings — 7,614 7,614 Total revenues 174,177 183,660 9,483 Expenditures Capital outlay General government 81,000 82,488 1,488 Excess of revenues over expenditures 93,177 101,172 7,995 Other financing sources Sale of capital assets — 212 212 Net change in fund balances $ 93,177 101,384 $ 8,207 Fund balances Beginning of year 647,250 End of year $ 748,634 -96- CITY OF FARMINGTON Fire Capital Projects Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Investment earnings $ 658 $ 3,262 $ 2,604 Other Donations 15,000 54,744 39,744 Total revenues 15,658 58,006 42,348 Expenditures Current Public safety 2,500 24,635 22,135 Capital outlay Public safety 220,000 232,114 12,114 Total expenditures 222,500 256,749 34,249 Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (206,842) (198,743) 8,099 Other financing sources Sale of capital assets - 1,420 1,420 Transfers in 295,000 309,513 14,513 Total other financing sources 295,000 310,933 15,933 Net change in fund balances $ 88,158 112,190 $ 24,032 Fund balances Beginning of year 244,495 End of year $ 356,685 -97- CITY OF FARMINGTON Private Capital Projects Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Special assessments $ — $ 843 $ 843 Charges for services 20,000 21,861 1,861 Investment earnings 2,354 3,834 1,480 Total revenues 22,354 26,538 4,184 Expenditures Capital outlay Public works 20,000 22,096 2,096 Net change in fund balances $ 2,354 4,442 $ 2,088 Fund balances Beginning of year 30,975 End of year $ 35,417 -98- CITY OF FARMINGTON Recreation Capital Projects Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Investment earnings $ 210 $ 477 $ 267 Other Donations 5,000 34,465 29,465 Total revenues 5,210 34,942 29,732 Expenditures Current Parks and recreation 7,500 4,231 (3,269) Capital outlay Parks and recreation — 174,298 174,298 Total expenditures 7,500 178,529 171,029 Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (2,290) (143,587) (141,297) Other financing sources Transfers in 20,000 98,121 78,121 Net change in fund balances $ 17,710 (45,466) $ (63,176) Fund balances Beginning of year 72,378 End of year $ 26,912 -99- CITY OF FARMINGTON General Capital Equipment Capital Projects Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule Year Ended December 31,2016 Original and Variance With Final Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Investment earnings $ 13 $ 2,008 $ 1,995 Other Donations — 5,250 5,250 Total revenues 13 7,258 7,245 Expenditures Current Public safety — 151 151 Capital outlay Public safety 141,607 139,217 (2,390) Total expenditures 141,607 139,368 (2,239) Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (141,594) (132,110) 9,484 Other financing sources Sales of capital assets — 8,874 8,874 Transfers in 156,607 246,732 90,125 Total other financing sources 156,607 255,606 98,999 Net change in fund balances $ 15,013 123,496 $ 108,483 Fund balances Beginning of year 94,265 End of year $ 217,761 -100- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Employee Expense —Used to account for the costs of employer-paid benefits, including pension, social security,health, life and dental insurance, and worker's compensation insurance. Property and Liability Insurance—Used to account for the costs of property and liability insurance for the City. Fleet—Used to account for the costs of vehicle maintenance services provided to divisions by staff at the city garage facility. Information Technology — Used to account for the costs of computer hardware, software, and Internet services provided to all city departments. -101- CITY OF FARMINGTON Internal Service Funds Combining Statement of Net Position as of December 31,2016 Property and Employee Liability Information Expense Insurance Fleet Technology Total Assets Current assets Cash and investments $ 1,287,268 $ 375,369 $ 168,578 $ 301,980 $ 2,133,195 Receivables Accounts 42,864 - 42,864 Interest 2,039 820 368 660 3,887 Due from other governments 107 - - - 107 Prepaid items 3,189 - - 13,527 16,716 Total current assets 1,335,467 376,189 168,946 316,167 2,196,769 Noncurrent assets Capital assets Machinery and equipment - - 79,453 - 79,453 Less accumulated depreciation - - (79,453) - (79,453) Total capital assets - - - - - Total assets $ 1,335,467 $ 376,189 $ 168,946 $ 316,167 $ 2,196,769 Current liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ - $ 1,445 $ 15,871 $ 32,097 $ 49,413 Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable 315,934 - 315,934 Deposits payable 599 - - - 599 Compensated absences payable - - 18,811 258 19,069 Total current liabilities 316,533 1,445 34,682 32,355 385,015 Net position Unrestricted 1,018,934 374,744 134,264 283,812 1,811,754 Total liabilities and net position $ 1,335,467 $ 376,189 $ 168,946 $ 316,167 $ 2,196,769 -102- CITY OF FARMINGTON Internal Service Funds Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position Year Ended December 31,2016 Property and Employee Liability Information Expense Insurance Fleet Technology Total Operating revenues Charges for services $ 2,128,860 $ - $ 276,813 $ 447,949 $ 2,853,622 Insurance reimbursement - 360,160 - - 360,160 Total operating revenues 2,128,860 360,160 276,813 447,949 3,213,782 Operating expenses Personal services 2,114,102 - 173,816 89,856 2,377,774 Professional services 21,404 226,906 248,310 Materials and supplies - - 55,596 98,536 154,132 Insurance - 300,047 - - 300,047 Total operating expenses 2,114,102 300,047 250,816 415,298 3,080,263 Operating income 14,758 60,113 25,997 32,651 133,519 Nonoperating revenue Intergovernmental 10,789 - - - 10,789 Investment earnings 9,530 3,398 1,818 3,051 17,797 Total nonoperating revenue 20,319 3,398 1,818 3,051 28,586 Income before transfers 35,077 63,511 27,815 35,702 162,105 Transfers in 363,022 16,110 - - 379,132 Change in net position 398,099 79,621 27,815 35,702 541,237 Net position Beginning of year 620,835 295,123 106,449 248,110 1,270,517 End of year $ 1,018,934 $ 374,744 $ 134,264 $ 283,812 $ 1,811,754 -103- CITY OF FARMINGTON Internal Service Funds Combining Statement of Cash Flows Year Ended December 31,2016 Property and Employee Liability Information Expense Insurance Fleet Technology Total Cash flows from operating activities Cash receipts from other funds and reimbursements $ 2,085,889 $ 360,160 $ 276,813 $ 447,949 $ 3,170,811 Cash payments to employees for services (2,031,554) - (172,525) (89,314) (2,293,393) Cash payments for interfund services used - (298,602) (69,380) (306,722) (674,704) Net cash flows from operating activities 54,335 61,558 34,908 51,913 202,714 Cash flows from noncapital related financing activities Intergovernmental 10,789 - - - 10,789 Transfers in 363,022. 16,110 - - 379,132 Net cash flows from noncapital related fmancingactivities 373,811 16,110 - - 389,921 Cash flows from investing activities Interest received on investments 9,722 3,351 1,796 3,040 17,909 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 437,868 81,019 36,704 54,953 610,544 Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of year 849,400 294,350 131,874 247,027 1,522,651 End of year $ 1,287,268 $ 375,369 $ 168,578 $ 301,980 $ 2,133,195 Reconciliation of operating income to net cash flows from operating activities Operating income $ 14,758 $ 60,113 $ 25,997 $ 32,651 $ 133,519 Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash flows from operating activities Change in assets and liabilities Accounts receivable (42,864) - - - (42,864) Due from other governments (107) - (107) Prepaid items 70,563 - - 1,822 72,385 Accounts and contracts payable - 1,445 7,620 16,898 25,963 Accrued salaries and employee benefits 12,082 - - - 12,082 Deposits payable (97) - - - (97) Compensated absences payable - - 1,291 542 1,833 Total adjustments 39,577 1,445 8,911 19,262 69,195 Net cash flows from operating activities $ 54,335 $ 61,558 $ 34,908 $ 51,913 $ 202,714 • -104- FIDUCIARY FUND Agency Fund — Used to account for receipt and remittance of monies held by the City as an agent primarily for land developers and builders that will be refunded to the respective depositors when the conditions are satisfied in accordance with the respective agreements. -105- CITY OF FARMINGTON Agency Fund Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities for the Year Ended December 31,2016 Balance Balance January 1, December 31, 2016 Additions Deductions 2016 Assets Cash and investments $ 317,120 $ 231,988 $ 351,024 $ 198,084 Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ — $ 12,000 $ — $ 12,000 Deposits payable 317,120 219,988 351,024 186,084 Total liabilities $ 317,120 $ 231,988 $ 351,024 $ 198,084 -106- DISCRETELY PRESENTED COMPONENT UNIT—EDA The following statements present the fund based financial information for the Farmington Economic Development Authority (EDA). The EDA utilizes one General Fund and two special revenue funds to administer the resources for the economic development authority within the City. -107- CITY OF FARMINGTON Economic Development Authority (Discretely Presented Component Unit) Combining Balance Sheet as of December 31,2016 Economic Special Revenue Development City Center Trident Housing Authority Tax Tax General Increment Increment Total Assets Cash and investments $ 330,975 $ — $ — $ 330,975 Receivables Accounts 9,789 — — 9,789 Interest 723 — — 723 Total assets $ 341,487 $ — $ — $ 341,487 Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ 1,269 $ — $ 827 $ 2,096 Fund balances(deficits) Assigned for economic development 340,218 — — 340,218 Unassigned — — (827) (827) Total fund balances(deficits) 340,218 — (827) 339,391 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 341,487 $ — $ — $ 341,487 -108- CITY OF FARMINGTON Economic Development Authority (Discretely Presented Component Unit) Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenditures,and Changes in Fund Balances Year Ended December 31,2016 Economic Special Revenue Development City Center Trident Housing Authority Tax Tax General Increment Increment Total Revenues Taxes $ — $ 55,421 $ — $ 55,421 Intergovernmental 81,500 — — 81,500 Investment earnings 3,514 628 — 4,142 Total revenues 85,014 56,049 — 141,063 Expenditures Current Economic development 69,175 114,536 827 184,538 Net change in fund balances 15,839 (58,487) (827) (43,475) Fund balances(deficits) Beginning of year 324,379 58,487 — 382,866 End of year $ 340,218 $ — $ (827) $ 339,391 -109- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) STATISTICAL TABLES (UNAUDITED) This part of the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR)presents detailed information as a context for understanding this year's financial statements, note disclosures, and supplementary information.This information has not been audited by the independent auditor. The contents of the statistical section include: Financial Trends–These tables contain trend information that may assist the reader in assessing the City's current financial performance by placing it in historical perspective. Revenue Capacity–These schedules contain information to assist the reader in assessing the City's most significant local revenue source—property taxes. Debt Capacity – These tables present information that may assist the reader in analyzing the affordability of the City's current levels of outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional debt in the future. Demographic and Economic Information – These tables offer economic and demographic indicators that are commonly used for financial analysis and that can assist the reader in understanding the City's present and ongoing financial status. Operating Information–These tables contain service and infrastructure indicators that can assist the reader in understanding how the information in the City's financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it performs. Source – Unless otherwise noted, the information in these tables is derived from the CAFR for the relevant year. -110- CITY OF FARMINGTON Net Position by Component Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets $ 34,026,294 $ 27,179,331 $ 33,485,859 $ 22,287,712 Restricted 5,621,371 5,239,803 4,036,063 3,757,948 Unrestricted 8,664,996 14,298,196 9,568,551 11,197,982 Total governmental activities net position $ 48,312,661 $ 46,717,330 $ 47,090,473 $ 37,243,642 Business-type activities Net investment in capital assets $ 58,050,157 $ 61,492,839 $ 59,999,027 $ 60,219,892 Restricted 2,035,244 2,094,245 2,094,245 2,108,045 Unrestricted 7,438,368 7,357,600 5,622,790 6,067,114 Total business-type activities net position $ 67,523,769 $ 70,944,684 $ 67,716,062 $ 68,395,051 Primary government Net investment in capital assets $ 92,076,451 $ 88,672,170 $ 93,484,886 $ 82,507,604 Restricted 7,656,615 7,334,048 6,130,308 5,865,993 Unrestricted 16,103,364 21,655,796 15,191,341 17,265,096 Total primary government net position $115,836,430 $117,662,014 $114,806,535 $105,638,693 Note: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015, recording a change in accounting principle that decreased unrestricted net position.Prior year balances were not restated. -111- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ 20,484,140 $ 21,263,670 $ 23,462,934 $ 23,383,175 $ 21,417,203 $ 23,684,773 1,661,973 11,034,909 11,669,054 9,235,448 9,063,587 10,441,391 14,963,297 11,131,928 9,628,139 13,150,789 8,920,144 5,142,435 $ 37,109,410 $ 43,430,507 $ 44,760,127 $ 45,769,412 $ 39,400,934 $ 39,268,599 $ 60,462,689 $ 58,728,008 $ 57,427,060 $ 55,685,476 $ 54,807,938 $ 53,225,787 2,140,345 2,159,566 2,159,566 2,160,566 2,160,566 2,231,966 6,819,607 7,845,545 8,891,769 10,396,218 11,439,369 12,575,526 $ 69,422,641 $ 68,733,119 $ 68,478,395 $ 68,242,260 $ 68,407,873 $ 68,033,279 $ 80,946,829 $ 79,991,678 $ 80,889,994 $ 79,068,651 $ 76,225,141 $ 76,910,560 3,802,318 13,194,475 13,828,620 11,396,014 11,224,153 12,673,357 21,782,904 18,977,473 18,519,908 23,547,007 20,359,513 17,717,961 $106,532,051 $112,163,626 $113,238,522 $114,011,672 $107,808,807 $107,301,878 -112- CITY OF FARMINGTON Changes in Net Position Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 Expenses Governmental activities General government $ 2,137,956 $ 2,476,747 $ 2,603,290 $ 2,410,637 Public safety 4,267,469 4,415,667 4,568,041 4,844,128 Public works 4,410,908 8,676,538 5,891,010 3,261,582 Park and recreation 2,018,845 2,188,941 1,814,966 1,864,728 Economic development — — 149,749 83,572 Intergovernmental donations — — — 8,526,239 Interest and fiscal charges 1,281,558 1,615,144 1,625,021 1,718,077 Total governmental activities expenses $ 14,116,736 $ 19,373,037 $ 16,652,077 $ 22,708,963 Business-type activities Liquor operations $ 4,167,586 $ 4,385,187 $ 4,335,267 $ 4,267,536 Sewer operations 1,938,784 1,786,170 1,887,357 1,811,992 Solid waste 1,803,932 1,830,082 1,799,151 1,773,240 Storm water 1,083,760 807,791 714,058 702,089 Water 1,606,115 2,588,880 1,859,342 1,732,559 Street light — — — 175,050 Total business-type activities 10,600,177 11,398,110 10,595,175 10,462,466 Total primary government expenses $ 24,716,913 $ 30,771,147 $ 27,247,252 $ 33,171,429 Program revenues Governmental activities Charges for services General government $ 1,556,119 $ 641,069 $ 504,802 $ 503,258 Public safety 451,233 481,589 430,107 427,593 Public works 1,436,915 300,437 1,031,006 355,506 Park and recreation 614,693 689,487 508,655 537,773 Economic development — — 25,789 13,374 Operating grants and contributions 7,418,326 10,695,352 1,214,756 551,257 Capital grants and contributions 862,732 944,140 1,140,980 2,449,930 Total governmental activities program revenues $ 12,340,018 $ 13,752,074 $ 4,856,095 $ 4,838,691 -113- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ 1,897,429 $ 1,865,415 $ 1,778,549 $ 1,940,630 $ 2,284,974 $ 2,268,779 5,162,361 4,989,522 5,156,950 5,192,091 5,357,738 6,979,608 2,800,221 3,063,908 3,849,742 4,893,341 7,473,095 5,497,796 1,666,466 1,719,254 1,775,967 1,730,734 1,815,882 1,904,792 114,639 44,114 50,000 49,417 90,000 40,000 313,198 - - - - - 1,431,468 1,302,605 1,290,439 1,020,096 992,422 1,032,748 $ 13,385,782 $ 12,984,818 $ 13,901,647 $ 14,826,309 $ 18,014,111 $ 17,723,723 $ 4,091,541 $ 4,116,030 $ 4,206,058 $ 4,315,834 $ 4,352,597 $ 4,448,932 1,879,752 1,891,872 1,627,927 1,712,146 1,875,225 2,051,152 1,789,114 1,727,384 1,658,547 1,600,434 1,658,128 1,753,162 745,967 734,516 513,582 615,684 731,444 534,988 1,772,096 1,705,167 1,427,298 1,410,214 1,339,588 1,359,215 180,200 176,513 184,834 174,957 173,212 288,924 10,458,670 10,351,482 9,618,246 9,829,269 10,130,194 10,436,373 $ 23,844,452 $ 23,336,300 $ 23,519,893 $ 24,655,578 $ 28,144,305 $ 28,160,096 $ 470,572 $ 436,113 $ 684,528 $ 534,008 $ 399,053 $ 668,849 461,659 423,721 482,759 409,460 351,038 459,240 306,860 225,497 115,092 94,416 9,624 195,716 520,522 581,341 596,165 607,566 604,111 651,936 6,333 - - - - - 507,180 533,939 713,378 677,999 649,541 744,730 2,388,656 4,976,219 645,233 477,833 671,671 818,545 $ 4,661,782 $ 7,176,830 $ 3,237,155 $ 2,801,282 $ 2,685,038 $ 3,539,016 (continued) -114- CITY OF FARMINGTON Changes in Net Position(continued) Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 Program revenues(continued) Business-type activities Charges for services Liquor operations $ 4,267,756 $ 4,436,714 $ 4,335,565 $ 4,285,471 Sewer operations 1,680,885 1,553,707 1,376,043 1,581,526 Solid waste 1,665,752 1,775,170 1,767,750 1,850,073 Storm water 349,445 445,815 460,346 464,043 Water 1,312,212 1,490,169 1,509,100 1,439,906 Street light - - - 140,773 Operating grants and contributions 119,604 103,010 104,206 72,631 Capital grants and contributions - 41,047 53,354 100,162 Total business-type activities program revenues 9,395,654 9,845,632 9,606,364 9,934,585 Total primary government program revenues $ 21,735,672 $ 23,597,706 $ 14,462,459 $ 14,773,276 Net(expense)revenue Governmental activities $ (1,776,718) $ (5,620,963) $(11,795,982) $(17,870,272) Business-type activities (1,204,523) (1,552,478) (988,811) (527,881) Total primary government net expense $ (2,981,241) $ (7,173,441) $(12,784,793) $(18,398,153) General revenues and other changes in net position Governmental activities Property taxes $ 8,040,734 $ 8,743,569 $ 8,963,578 $ 9,189,015 Tax increments - - 185,726 155,094 Franchise taxes - - 219,722 228,932 Unrestricted grants and contributions 337,753 173,383 47,830 927 Unrestricted investment earnings(charges) 750,689 513,072 311,546 181,943 Gain on sale of assets - - 4,626 25,412 Transfers 1,120,865 (4,713,510) 2,436,097 (1,107,882) Total governmental activities $ 10,250,041 $ 4,716,514 $ 12,169,125 $ 8,673,441 Business-type activities Unrestricted investment earnings(charges) $ 371,614 $ 204,480 $ 196,286 $ 98,988 Gain on disposal of assets - 55,403 - - Transfers (1,120,865) 4,713,510 (2,436,097) 1,107,882 Total business-type activities (749,251) 4,973,393 (2,239,811) 1,206,870 Total primary government $ 9,500,790 $ 9,689,907 $ 9,929,314 $ 9,880,311 Change in net position Governmental activities $ 8,473,323 $ (904,449) $ 373,143 $ (9,196,831) Business-type activities (1,953,774) 3,420,915 (3,228,622) 678,989 Total primary government $ 6,519,549 $ 2,516,466 $ (2,855,479) $ (8,517,842) -115- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ 4,199,344 $ 4,397,572 $ 4,521,454 $ 4,639,194 $ 4,607,417 $ 4,742,313 1,600,303 1,787,957 1,816,763 1,843,746 1,957,902 2,043,859 1,872,771 1,869,426 1,952,177 1,979,623 1,991,179 2,041,561 467,729 475,060 565,166 559,327 670,353 643,479 1,417,708 1,595,116 1,558,400 1,499,091 1,439,873 1,631,643 178,464 215,029 216,719 219,052 222,159 224,781 29,000 20,010 19,300 21,000 22,000 23,000 49,473 100,525 108,642 - 945,938 9,814,792 10,460,695 10,758,621 10,761,033 11,856,821 11,3 50,636 $ 14,476,574 $ 17,637,525 $ 13,995,776 $ 13,562,315 $ 14,541,859 $ 14,889,652 $ (8,724,000) $ (5,807,988) $(10,664,492) $(12,025,027) $(15,329,073) $(14,184,707) (643,878) 109,213 1,140,375 931,764 1,726,627 914,263 $ (9,367,878) $ (5,698,775) $ (9,524,117) $(11,093,263) $(13,602,446) $(13,270,444) $ 9,607,893 $ 10,742,860 $ 10,748,581 $ 10,962,860 $ 11,460,209 $ 11,806,302 150,339 154,214 - - - - 237,449 243,635 259,671 269,208 265,485 275,691 1,500 1,816 24,845 257,386 278,974 287,252 119,632 77,276 (32,408) 130,739 189,540 255,021 75,306 - 18,268 - - - (1,602,351) 909,284 1,410,114 1,414,119 1,222,807 1,428,106 $ 8,589,768 $ 12,129,085 $ 12,429,071 $ 13,034,312 $ 13,417,015 $ 14,052,372 $ 69,117 $ 110,549 $ (40,071) $ 246,220 $ 152,954 $ 139,249 - - 55,086 - - - 1,602,351 (909,284) (1,410,114) (1,414,119) (1,222,807) (1,428,106) 1,671,468 (798,735) (1,395,099) (1,167,899) (1,069,853) (1,288,857) $ 10,261,236 $ 11,330,350 $ 11,033,972 $ 11,866,413 $ 12,347,162 $ 12,763,515 $ (134,232) $ 6,321,097 $ 1,764,579 $ 1,009,285 $ (1,912,058) $ (132,335) 1,027,590 (689,522) (254,724) (236,135) 656,774 (374,594) $ 893,358 $ 5,631,575 $ 1,509,855 $ 773,150 $ (1,255,284) $ (506,929) -116- CITY OF FARMINGTON Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 General Fund Reserved $ — $ 29,198 $ 31,996 $ 30,314 Unreserved 2,139,686 2,008,315 2,125,884 2,188,528 Nonspendable — — — — Restricted — — — — Committed — — — — Assigned — — — — Unassigned — — — — Total General Fund $ 2,139,686 $ 2,037,513 $ 2,157,880 $ 2,218,842 All other governmental funds Reserved $ 2,303,108 $ 1,962,741 $ 435,000 $ 381,500 Unreserved,designated,reported in Capital projects funds 11,164,672 9,185,158 — — Unreserved,undesignated,reported in Special revenue funds 823,821 343,559 52,771 (159,042) Capital projects funds (2,312,185) (518,992) 3,415,978 6,244,182 Debt service funds (12,236) (148,755) 1,155,954 738,371 Nonspendable — — Restricted — — — — Committed — — — — Assigned — — — — Unassigned — — — — Total all other governmental funds $ 11,967,180 $ 10,823,711 $ 5,059,703 $ 7,205,011 Total all funds $ 14,106,866 $ 12,861,224 $ 7,217,583 $ 9,423,853 Note 1: The City implemented GASB Statement No.54 in fiscal 2011.Prior year information has not been restated. Note 2: The City modified its fund balance policy in 2015,resulting in an increase in committed fund balances. -117- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 43,102 612,518 13,388 33,369 6,034 33,762 - - - 81,000 4,250 - 2,093,006 2,067,246 3,079,013 3,993,191 4,734,534 5,031,529 $ 2,136,108 $ 2,679,764 $ 3,092,401 $ 4,107,560 $ 4,744,818 $ 5,065,291 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 307,074 146 - 160 150 110 2,312,309 2,950,166 6,881,858 5,673,161 5,776,314 16,959,150 8,025,185 5,158,828 6,726,928 9,134,820 7,865,678 7,531,076 - - (576,114) - - - - - $ 8,770,197 $ 12,085,132 $ 14,747,536 $ 13,204,397 $ 13,801,649 $ 22,118,088 $ 10,906,305 $ 14,764,896 $ 17,839,937 $ 17,311,957 $ 18,546,467 $ 27,183,379 -118- CITY OF FARMINGTON Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 Revenues General property taxes $ 7,974,235 $ 8,565,878 $ 8,944,965 $ 9,392,326 Franchise fees 196,454 215,689 219,722 228,932 Special assessments 1,157,022 893,897 778,101 1,450,515 Licenses and permits 1,217,163 360,068 376,183 454,769 Intergovernmental 7,756,079 10,868,735 1,915,315 2,657,788 Charges for services 1,545,478 723,875 1,585,069 1,141,182 Fines and forfeits 75,411 75,522 67,155 64,779 Investment earnings 750,689 513,072 311,546 176,191 Other 892,832 717,206 503,493 375,201 Total revenues 21,565,363 22,933,942 14,701,549 15,941,683 Expenditures Current General government 1,822,699 1,925,414 2,061,106 2,064,477 Public safety 3,802,591 4,050,691 4,234,175 4,589,650 Public works 1,507,555 1,581,410 3,407,642 1,379,325 Park and recreation 2,058,213 1,812,370 1,525,303 1,591,378 Economic development 336,351 114,997 102,769 84,572 Capital outlay 13,715,576 21,511,910 7,287,689 4,046,022 Debt service Principal 2,202,183 1,854,314 2,796,155 2,238,084 Interest and fiscal charges 1,045,361 1,424,339 1,681,127 1,507,873 Total expenditures 26,490,529 34,275,445 23,095,966 17,501,381 Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (4,925,166) (11,341,503) (8,394,417) (1,559,698) Other financing sources(uses) Bonds issued 9,919,439 9,818,996 — 8,710,984 Payment of refunded debt — — — (5,948,057) Sale of capital assets 131,622 20,222 4,626 25,412 Transfers in 2,588,096 1,156,057 5,830,778 3,359,406 Transfers out (1,467,231) (899,414) (3,084,628) (2,381,778) Total other financing sources(uses) 11,171,926 10,095,861 2,750,776 3,765,967 Net change in fund balances $ 6,246,760 $ (1,245,642) $ (5,643,641) $ 2,206,269 Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures 25.4% 25.7% 28.3% 27.8% -119- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ 9,690,053 $ 11,112,325 $ 10,808,636 $ 11,031,219 $ 11,462,986 $ 11,852,567 237,449 243,635 259,671 269,208 265,485 275,691 720,862 3,296,216 913,313 821,331 661,187 545,777 456,791 423,153 664,673 514,728 370,889 650,311 2,217,217 556,496 1,329,395 1,011,221 2,097,509 1,633,388 1,096,174 1,015,835 865,736 890,281 820,445 1,077,860 78,710 73,210 81,919 65,482 52,299 41,750 20,444 158,657 46,707 130,739 172,818 237,224 272,234 222,083 233,808 174,959 160,193 260,564 14,789,934 17,101,610 15,203,858 14,909,168 16,063,811 16,575,132 1,828,147 1,830,470 1,686,263 1,717,994 1,947,768 1,996,410 4,705,581 4,702,399 4,850,400 4,871,745 5,131,076 5,301,211 1,382,306 1,402,838 2,081,956 2,038,161 1,971,079 2,006,606 1,399,541 1,427,257 1,530,238 1,448,951 1,538,452 1,513,411 112,612 91,165 50,000 49,417 90,000 40,000 316,134 555,293 1,290,875 1,839,726 4,695,581 2,755,780 5,090,101 2,912,213 7,394,424 2,376,739 2,899,162 4,411,534 1,527,970 1,336,414 1,379,551 1,096,007 1,041,780 1,095,380 16,362,392 14,258,049 20,263,707 15,438,740 19,314,898 19,120,332 (1,572,458) 2,843,561 (5,059,849) (529,572) (3,251,087) (2,545,200) 2,418,979 - 7,088,037 - 3,184,641 10,120,095 - - - (1,435,000) - - 139,454 105,746 26,154 22,473 157,599 13,043 2,455,874 3,997,318 7,492,556 2,330,331 5,937,539 5,590,211 (1,959,397) (3,088,034) (6,082,442) (916,212) (4,794,182) (4,541,237) 3,054,910 1,015,030 8,524,305 1,592 4,485,597 11,182,112 $ 1,482,452 $ 3,858,591 $ 3,464,456 $ (527,980) $ 1,234,510 $ 8,636,912 41.2% 31.0% 46.2% 24.8% 21.0% 29.5% -120- CITY OF FARMINGTON Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years Commercial/ Industrial, Public Utility, Less Captured Payable Residential Railroads,and Agricultural Tax Increment Year Property Personal Property Apartments Property Tax Capacity 2007 $ 15,288,158 $ 1,978,027 $ 307,472 $ 153,964 $ (495,460) 2008 16,248,923 2,335,426 307,317 186,181 (272,852) 2009 16,198,494 2,718,255 293,783 251,152 (276,434) 2010 14,657,576 2,849,385 289,447 272,170 (227,913) 2011 13,340,049 2,765,411 267,263 224,369 (143,056) 2012 11,604,460 2,683,032 269,378 207,859 (137,147) 2013 10,805,838 2,666,688 270,394 220,247 (130,805) 2014 11,207,086 2,669,813 272,246 234,772 (119,175) 2015 12,802,297 2,688,017 271,615 266,387 (113,361) 2016 14,005,748 2,739,868 280,096 272,897 (117,585) Note: The tax capacity (assessed taxable value) of the property is calculated by applying a statutory formula to the estimated market value of the property. Source: Dakota County -121- Estimated Tax Capacity Less Contributions Total Direct Actual Value as a to Fiscal Fiscal Disparities Total Tax Tax Capacity Taxable Percentage of Disparities Pool Distribution Capacity Value Rate Value Actual Value $ (231,416) $ 931,980 $ 17,932,725 41.882 % $ 1,670,767,400 1.07 % (293,226) 929,718 19,441,487 43.821 1,785,560,700 1.09 (366,353) 1,224,665 20,043,562 44.186 1,804,253,700 1.11 (462,792) 1,304,003 18,681,876 49.274 1,661,903,500 1.12 (554,552) 1,537,976 17,437,460 55.730 1,522,502,000 1.15 (611,325) 2,016,261 16,032,518 63.093 1,344,600,257 1.19 (642,069) 2,195,874 15,386,167 66.821 1,266,601,230 1.21 (1,011,274) 3,371,993 16,625,461 65.876 1,311,752,463 1.27 (1,002,736) 3,397,197 18,309,416 61.455 1,475,969,866 1.24 (953,101) 3,424,887 19,652,810 59.239 1,601,441,554 1.23 -122- CITY OF FARMINGTON Property Tax Rates(1) Direct and Overlapping Governments Last Ten Fiscal Years City Direct Rates Overlapping Rates(2) Total Direct Fiscal Debt Total Dakota Other Special Overlapping Year Operating Service City County ISD No. 192 Districts Rate 2007 31.286 10.596 41.882 25.119 44.177 3.771 114.949 2008 33.348 10.473 43.821 25.177 45.819 3.749 118.566 2009 32.212 11.974 44.186 25.821 49.238 3.693 122.938 2010 37.103 12.171 49.274 27.261 53.439 3.821 133.795 2011 38.788 16.942 55.730 29.149 52.157 3.429 140.465 2012 43.954 19.139 63.093 31.417 55.292 4.187 153.989 2013 45.597 21.224 66.821 33.411 57.208 4.426 161.866 2014 47.308 18.568 65.876 31.820 56.300 4.150 158.146 2015 44.964 16.491 61.455 29.625 53.460 3.741 148.281 2016 44.220 15.019 59.239 28.562 57.570 3.802 149.173 (1) Information reflects total tax rates levied by each entity. Tax rates are expressed in terms of"net tax capacity."A property's tax capacity is determined by multiplying its taxable market value by a state determined class rate. Class rates vary by property type and changed periodically based on state legislation. (2) Overlapping rates are those of local and county governments that apply to property owners within the City.Not all overlapping rates apply to all of the City's property owners. Source: Dakota County -123- CITY OF FARMINGTON Principal Property Taxpayers Current Fiscal Year and Nine Years Prior 2016 2007 Percentage Percentage of Total of Total Net Tax City Tax Net Tax City Tax Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Taxpayer Value Rank Value Value Rank Value Northern Natural Gas $ 527,830 1 3.05 % $ 262,962 1 1.48 % Xcel Energy(Northern States Power) 190,064 2 1.10 64,338 9 0.36 Dakota Electric Association 130,920 3 0.76 126,516 2 0.71 Dakota Storage,LLC 81,608 4 0.47 83,488 5 0.47 Minnesota Energy Resources 72,038 5 0.42 — — — Valmont Industries 68,696 6 0.40 69,356 6 0.39 RLR Investments,LLC 67,886 7 0.39 — — — St.Francis Health Systems 67,281 8 0.39 86,484 4 0.49 POR-MKR Real Estate,LLC 65,470 9 0.38 — Farmington City Center,LLC 63,618 10 0.37 94,388 3 0.53 Giles Properties — — — 67,741 7 0.38 Schwiness,LLC — — — 67,436 8 0.38 Utilicorp United Inc. — — — 58,476 10 0.33 Total $ 1,335,411 7.72 % $ 981,185 5.53 % Source:Dakota County -124- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF FARMINGTON Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years , Collected Within the Fiscal Year of Levy(2) Total Collections to Date Total Tax Percentage Delinquent Percentage Fiscal Levy for of Tax of Year Fiscal Year(1) Amount Levy Collections(2) Amount Levy 2007 $ 7,926,780 $ 7,727,933 97.49 % $ 195,586 $ 7,923,519 99.96 % 2008 8,869,919 8,435,469 95.10 427,588 8,863,057 99.92 2009 9,313,415 8,637,012 92.74 666,963 9,303,975 99.90 2010 9,586,323 8,826,496 92.07 750,850 9,577,346 99.91 • 2011 9,869,985 9,334,157 94.57 531,493 9,865,650 99.96 2012 10,582,243 10,377,369 98.06 198,285 10,575,654 99.94 2013 10,734,608 10,581,301 98.57 141,683 10,722,984 99.89 2014 10,981,055 10,889,973 99.17 69,504 10,959,477 99.80 2015 11,402,145 11,307,924 99.17 66,883 11,374,807 99.76 2016 11,718,018 11,656,384 99.47 — 11,656,384 99.47 (1) Includes fiscal disparity revenues. (2) Includes fiscal disparity revenues and is net of county/state adjustments. Source: Dakota County -125- CITY OF FARMINGTON Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type Last Ten Fiscal Years Governmental Activities Special Certificates General Assessment Tax of Fiscal Year Obligation Bonds(1) Bonds Increment Bonds Indebtedness 2007 $ 19,287,725 $ 13,895,000 $ 475,000 $ 1,215,000 2008 18,788,411 22,935,000 425,000 770,000 2009 17,757,256 21,685,000 370,000 310,000 2010 16,629,173 22,645,000 320,000 1,305,000 2011 15,774,072 21,010,000 265,000 1,145,000 2012 14,891,859 19,160,000 205,000 1,025,000 2013 15,467,435 18,235,000 140,000 905,000 2014 14,520,696 15,630,000 — 785,000 2015 16,496,534 13,930,000 — 660,000 2016 20,115,000 15,645,000 — 535,000 Note 1:Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. Note 2: See Demographic and Economic Statistics schedule for population and personal income information. N/A—Not Available -126- Business-Type Activities Net Total Premiums Revenue Primary Per Percentage of (Discounts) Bonds Government Capita Personal Income $ — $ 1,280,000 $ 36,152,725 $ 1,716 3.8 % 1,080,000 43,998,411 2,061 4.5 — 875,000 40,997,256 1,893 4.4 — 665,000 41,564,173 1,971 4.4 — 450,000 38,644,072 1,793 3.8 — 230,000 35,511,859 1,629 3.3 203,702 — 34,951,137 1,578 3.2 177,829 — 31,113,525 1,386 2.7 277,972 — 31,364,506 1,386 2.6 738,645 — 37,033,645 1,650 N/A -127- CITY OF FARMINGTON Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding Last Ten Fiscal Years Less Amounts General Restricted for Market Percentage of Fiscal Obligation Repaying Value of Market Value of Year Bonds(1) Principal(2) Total Property Property 2007 $ 19,287,725 $ — $ 19,287,725 $ 1,670,767,400 1.15 % 2008 18,788,411 — 18,788,411 1,785,560,700 1.05 2009 17,757,256 — 17,757,256 1,804,253,700 0.98 2010 16,629,173 — 16,629,173 1,661,903,500 1.00 2011 15,774,072 — 15,774,072 1,522,502,000 1.04 2012 14,891,859 — 14,891,859 1,344,600,257 1.11 2013 15,467,435 606,820 14,860,615 1,266,601,230 1.17 2014 14,520,696 852,842 13,667,854 1,311,752,463 1.04 2015 16,496,534 1,157,993 15,338,541 1,475,969,866 1.04 2016 20,115,000 7,894,089 12,220,911 1,601,441,554 0.76 Note: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. (1) Includes all general obligations of the City, including Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Revenue and Lease Revenue Bonds. (2) Amounts restricted for repaying principal for years prior to 2013 are not readily available. (3) See Demographic and Economic Statistics schedule for population and personal income information. N/A—Not Available Source: Dakota County website and Dakota County Assessor's Office -128- Assessed Percentage of Percentage Value of Assessed Value of Personal Per Property of Property Population(3) Income(3) Capita $ 16,701,068 115.49 % 21,072 1.75 % $ 915 18,135,711 103.60 21,343 1.85 880 18,314,489 96.96 21,654 1.94 820 16,808,764 98.93 21,086 1.80 789 16,454,036 95.87 21,558 1.61 732 14,764,729 100.86 21,806 1.38 683 13,963,167 106.43 22,154 1.27 671 14,383,917 95.02 22,446 1.24 609 16,028,316 95.70 22,622 1.32 678 17,298,609 70.65 22,451 N/A 544 -129- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF FARMINGTON Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt December 31,2016 Estimated Estimated Share of Net Debt Percentage Overlapping Governmental Unit Outstanding Applicable(1) Debt Overlapping debt Dakota County(2) $ — 3.863 % $ — ISD No. 192Farmington 213,165,000 58.755 125,246,152 ISD No. 196 Rosemount—Apple Valley—Eagan 170,930,000 0.004 6,624 Metropolitan Council(3) 189,226,614 4.019 7,604,446 Total overlapping debt 573,321,614 132,857,222 Direct debt City of Farmington direct debt 37,033,645 100.000 37,033,645 Total direct and overlapping debt $ 610,355,259 $ 169,890,867 (1) The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using tax capacity. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of the governmental unit's tax capacity that is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by the governmental unit's total tax capacity. (2) Dakota County did not have any outstanding general obligation debt supported by taxes at year-end. (3) The above debt includes all outstanding general obligation debt of the Metropolitan Council supported by taxes. The Metropolitan Council also has general obligation sewer revenue,wastewater revenue,and radio revenue bonds and lease obligations outstanding, all of which are supported entirely by revenues and are not included in the overlapping debt or debt ratios sections above. Note: Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part,with the geographic boundaries of the City.This schedule estimates the portion of the outstanding debt of those overlapping governments that is borne by the residents and businesses of the City.This process recognizes that,when considering the City's ability to issue and repay long-term debt, the entire debt burden borne by the residents and businesses should be taken into account. However,this does not imply that every taxpayer is a resident and,therefore, responsible for repaying the debt of each overlapping government. Source: Dakota County Property Taxation Office and related Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports -130- CITY OF FARMINGTON Legal Debt Margin Information Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 Debt limit $ 33,415,348 $ 35,711,214 $ 36,087,407 $ 33,238,070 Total net debt applicable to limit 17,448,186 17,963,411 16,327,256 17,934,173 Legal debt margin $ 15,967,162 $ 17,747,803 $ 19,760,151 $ 15,303,897 Total net debt applicable to the limit as a percentage of debt limit 52.22% 50.30% 45.24% 53.96% Note: The debt limit was raised from 2 percent to 3 percent of taxable market value,effective June 30,2008. -131- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ 45,675,060 $ 40,338,008 $ 37,998,037 $ 39,352,574 $ 44,279,096 $ 48,043,247 16,919,072 15,916,859 15,442,435 14,520,696 16,496,534 20,115,000 $ 28,755,988 $ 24,421,149 $ 22,555,602 $ 24,831,878 $ 27,782,562 $ 27,928,247 37.04% 39.46% 40.64% 36.90% 37.26% 41.87% Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2016 Market value $ 1,601,441,554 Debt limit(3%of market value) 48,043,247 Debt applicable to limit 20,115,000 Legal debt margin $ 27,928,247 -132- CITY OF FARMINGTON Pledged Revenue Coverage Last Ten Fiscal Years Less Direct Net Revenue Fiscal Gross Operating Available for Debt Service Requirements Year Revenue(a) Expenses(b) Debt Service Principal Interest Total Coverage 2007 $ 1,795,043 $(1,308,518) $ 486,525 $ 195,000 $ 37,911 $ 232,911 208.89 % 2008 1,588,810 (1,154,444) 434,366 200,000 33,831 233,831 185.76 2009 1,376,043 (1,190,315) 185,728 205,000 30,791 235,791 78.77 2010 1,581,526 (1,191,274) 390,252 210,000 25,923 235,923 165.41 2011 1,600,303 (1,243,796) 356,507 215,000 21,760 236,760 150.58 2012 1,787,957 (1,286,270) 501,687 230,000 7,360 237,360 211.36 2013 No longer applicable—debt repaid in full in 2013 2014 No longer applicable—debt repaid in full in 2013 2015 No longer applicable—debt repaid in full in 2013 2016 No longer applicable—debt repaid in full in 2013 (a) Includes gross revenues of the Sewer Operations Funds. (b) Exclusive of depreciation. Note: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. -133- CITY OF FARMINGTON Demographic and Economic Statistics Last Ten Fiscal Years Total Fiscal School Unemployment Personal Per Capita Year Population(1) Households(1) Enrollment(3) Rate(2) Income(5) Income(4) 2007 21,072 7,143 6,207 4.1 % $ 951,906,528 $ 45,174 2008 21,343 7,453 6,472 6.1 982,823,807 46,049 2009 21,654 7,824 6,320 7.3 942,013,962 43,503 2010 21,086 7,4I2 6,499 6.5 934,426,090 44,315 2011 21,558 7,464 6,555 5.2 1,022,905,542 47,449 2012 21,806 7,532 6,560 6.1 1,068,254,134 48,989 2013 22,154 7,806 6,877 4.7 1,097,930,086 49,559 2014 22,446 7,906 7,075 3.1 1,159,941,942 51,677 2015 22,622 7,959 7,019 3.3 1,215,027,620 53,710 2016 22,451 7,657 7,074 3.4 N/A N/A (1) Numbers for 2007-2015 are from the Farmington Building Inspections Department. The 2016 numbers are from the Metropolitan Council,which uses a more scientific and in-depth approach to estimating these values.They also have a one year lag in reporting. (2) Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development-Dakota County 2015 Annual Rate. (3) Farmington School District-October enrollment count. (4) U.S.Bureau of Economic Analysis-Per capital personal income for Dakota County residents. (5) Per capita personal income for Dakota County residents multiplied by the estimated city population. N/A-Not Available -134- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF FARMINGTON Principal Employers Current Fiscal Year and Nine Years Prior 2016 2007 Percentage of Total Percentage Employees Employment Employees of Total Taxpayer (1) Rank (2) (1) Rank Employment ISD No. 192,Farmington Public Schools 900 1 19.2 % 739 1 15.1 % Federal Aviation Administration 600 2 12.8 650 2 13.3 Dakota Electric 200 3 4.3 220 3 4.5 Trinity Care Center&Trinity Terrace 175 4 3.7 120 6 2.5 Marshall Lines,Inc. 175 5 3.7 — — — R&L Carriers 163 6 3.5 — — — Kemps Dairy 132 7 2.8 139 4 2.8 Valmont Industries(Lexington Standard) 130 8 2.8 126 5 2.6 City of Farmington 96 9 2.0 87 8 1.8 JIT Powder Coating 65 10 1.4 — — — River Valley Home Care — — — 112 7 2.3 Econofoods — — — 83 9 1.7 Controlled Air — — — 67 10 1.4 Total 2,636 56.1 % 2,343 47.9 % (1) Per City of Farmington records. (2) Metropolitan Council Employment by Community as of 2015(latest available),4,696 total employment. -135- CITY OF FARMINGTON Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 General government Administration 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 Finance 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 2.75 Human resources/information technology 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.80 Community development 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 Total general government 16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 8.55 Public safety Police administration 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.15 Police patrol 18.00 18.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 Investigations 4.00 4.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Fire 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 Total public safety 28.00 29.00 30.00 30.00 30.40 Public works Building inspections 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Engineering 2.30 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.42 Streets 4.10 4.00 4.68 4.68 4.68 Snowplowing 0.40 0.43 0.45 0.45 0.45 Natural resources 0.80 0.75 1.12 1.12 1.02 Total public works 11.60 10.28 11.35 11.35 11.57 Parks and recreation Park maintenance 4.50 5.00 5.44 5.44 4.44 Building maintenance 1.30 1.00 - - - Recreation programming 3.00 3.00 1.50 2.00 2.00 Total parks and recreation 8.80 9.00 6.94 7.44 6.44 Senior center 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.10 Swimming pool 2.20 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.40 Arena 1.50 1.50 1.86 1.86 2.11 Liquor operations 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 7.25 Sewer 2.90 2.81 2.41 2.41 2.60 Solid waste 7.40 6.39 6.38 6.38 6.38 Storm water utility 2.50 2.53 2.53 2.53 2.93 Water 3.10 2.99 3.64 3.64 3.83 Fleet 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Total employees 94.00 91.00 90.51 90.51 85.56 Note: In addition to the above, the City has a volunteer fire department of 50 people and hires seasonal staff for its summer parks and recreation operations. Source: Various city departments -136- 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 5.25 3.50 3.50 3.00 2.00 2.50 4.00 4.00 4.50 5.50 1.80 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 10.55 12.50 13.00 13.00 13.50 6.15 5.15 5.15 5.15 5.15 16.50 18.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 6.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.50 1.50 30.55 29.55 28.55 28.65 28.65 2.93 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.20 2.34 5.10 4.60 4.50 4.50 4.68 10.00 10.00 9.00 9.50 0.45 - - - - 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.42 18.60 18.10 17.00 18.20 4.44 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 6.44 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 1.10 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 2.11 2.35 2.35 2.35 2.35 7.25 7.25 7.50 8.00 8.00 2.59 - - - - 6.38 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.50 2.93 - - - - 3.83 - - - - 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 86.55 85.65 84.90 83.90 86.50 -137- CITY OF FARMINGTON Operating Indicators by Function Last Ten Years Fiscal Year Function/Program 2007 2008 2009 2010 General government Elections N/A 1 N/A 1 Registered voters N/A 13,070 N/A 11,820 Number of votes cast N/A 10,309 N/A 7,002 Voter participation(registered) N/A 78.9% N/A 59.2% Public safety Police Arrests 666 563 440 399 All citations and warnings* 1,552 1,618 1,498 1,848 Calls for service 13,775 12,976 13,025 12,710 Fire Medical 398 370 251 257 Fire 226 230 324 272 Inspections Building permits 2,430 628 576 907 Value of building permits(in millions) $ 130 $ 18 $ 20 $ 22 Parks and recreation Parks Park reservations 77 106 77 76 Pool Pool open swim admissions 12,627 13,833 11,163 13,009 Pool swim lesson registrations 542 528 371 405 Pool season passes sold 126 75 69 71 Pool punch cards sold 198 230 202 163 Swim bus riders 1,069 997 1,059 729 Rambling River Center Memberships 523 531 440 430 Program participation N/A 13,279 18,104 11,738 Number of volunteers 184 200 215 107 Total volunteer hours 2,174 2,400 6,315 4,276 Ice arena Ice skating lessons total participants 198 195 213 263 Arena rental hours 1,237 1,263 1,191 1,171 Outdoor rinks total number of skaters 3,995 4,740 6,542 9,797 Other Recreation program/event participants 9,662 8,427 6,568 6,258 Youth scholarships provided 69 44 31 45 *Beginning in 2012,this figure includes warnings. N/A-Not Available Source:Various city departments -138- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 13,358 N/A 12,541 N/A 13,788 N/A 11,185 N/A 6,419 N/A 11,545 N/A 84.0% N/A 51.0% N/A 84.0% 527 435 403 266 153 351 2,253 4,359.00 4,517 3,383 2,494 2,070 13,807 15,094 13,138 13,035 12,085 11,943 274 290 323 386 359 356 227 254 235 241 361 345 747 818 679 711 619 1,184 $ 25 $ 17 $ 35 $ 24 $ 15 $ 38 67 69 65 66 66 81 11,869 13,069 11,566 8,032 7,652 7,372 410 407 308 267 256 309 63 89 78 N/A N/A N/A 142 130 154 193 176 125 620 641 786 408 536 507 430 428 435 406 381 404 15,817 16,198 16,875 15,285 13,885 13,042 108 152 94 130 107 82 4,601 3,741 4,780 4,348 5,944 8,573 195 200 215 230 216 329 1,271 1,197 1,147 1,197 1,315 1,285 6,499 5,259 7,819 7,481 7,851 5,187 6,126 6,607 6,971 6,425 5,976 8,344 20 22 25 7 4 6 -139- CITY OF FARMINGTON Capital Assets Statistics by Function/Program Last Ten Years Fiscal Year Function/Program 2007 2008 2009 2010 Public safety Police Stations 1 1 1 1 Patrol squads 16 20 18 18 Fire Stations 2 2 2 2 Fire trucks 7 7 7 7 Public works Vehicles 21 21 21 21 Streets(miles) 82 89 89 89 Parks and recreation Senior center—building 1 1 1 1 Swimming pool 1 1 1 1 Ice arena—building 1 1 1 1 Parks 21 21 21 21 Liquor operations Store—building — — — — Solid waste Compactor trucks 6 6 6 6 Sanitary sewer Collection system(miles) 83 84 84 84 Storm sewer Storm sewer(miles) 70 71 70 71 Water 108 108 108 109 Water main(miles) 7 7 7 7 Wells 2 2 2 2 Water reservoirs Source:City's financial records -140- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 17 17 16 16 15 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 7 7 6 6 8 21 20 21 21 24 29 89 89 89 89 89 89 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 21 21 23 23 23 6 6 5 5 5 5 84 84 84 84 84 84 71 71 71 71 73 73 109 109 109 109 109 109 7 7 7 7 7 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 -141- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK