The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02.21.06 Council Packet City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future, AGENDA PRE-CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 21, 2006 6:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA 5. STAFF COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT ouncil workshops are conducted as an informal work session, all discussions shall be considered fact-finding, hypothetical and unofficial critical thinking exercises, which do not reflect an official public position, Council work session outcomes should not be construed by the attending public and/or reporting media as the articulation of a formal City policy position, Only official Council action normally taken at a regularly scheduled Council meeting should be considered as a formal expression of the City's position on any given matter, City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 21,2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Action Taken 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (2/6/06 Regular) (2/13/06 Special) b) Adopt Resolution - Gambling Event Permit - Administration c) Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License - Administration d) Set Interview Date - Rambling River Center Advisory Board - Administration e) School and Conference - Finance f) Appointment Recommendation Police - Human Resources g) Appointment Recommendation Parks and Recreation - Human Resources h) Approve Assessment Agreement - Ash Street Project - Engineering i) Adopt Ordinance - Text Amendment Allowable Uses and Maintenance of Boulevard Trees and Reference to Street Trees - Community Development j) Approve Bills k) Appointment Recommendation Administration - Human Resources 1) Adopt Resolution - 2006 Mill and Overlay Project - Engineering m) Adopt Resolution - 19Sth Street Extension to TH3 Project - Engineering Approved R21-06 Approved March 6, 2006 Information Received Approved Approved Approved Ord 006-550 Approved Approved R22-06 R23-06 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) NPDES Phase II Annual Report - Engineering Information Received 9. AWARDOFCONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Accept Summary Report Community Center Study - Parks and Recreation Approved b) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone - Regan Property - Community Development c) Preliminary 2005 Financials - Finance 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Adopt Resolution - Authorize Advertisement for Bids Spruce Street Extension Project - Engineering b) Snow Removal Policy - Sidewalks on Ash Street - Engineering 12. NEWBUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN R24-06 Ord 006-551 Information Received R25-06 Information Received City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future, AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Action Taken 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (2/6/06 Regular) (2/13/06 Special) Page 1 b) Adopt Resolution - Gambling Event Permit - Administration Page 2 c) Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License - Administration Page 3 d) Set Interview Date - Rambling River Center Advisory Board - Administration Page 4 e) School and Conference - Finance Page 5 f) Appointment Recommendation Police - Human Resources Page 6 g) Appointment Recommendation Parks and Recreation - Human Resources Page 7 h) Approve Assessment Agreement - Ash Street Project - Engineering Page 8 i) Adopt Ordinance - Text Amendment Allowable Uses and Maintenance of Boulevard Trees and Reference to Street Trees - Community Development Page 9 j) Approve Bills Page 10 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) NPDES Phase II Annual Report - Engineering Page 11 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT roo PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Accept Summary Report Community Center Study - Parks and Recreation Page 12 b) Adopt Resolution - 2006 Mill and Overlay Proj ect - Engineering Page 13 c) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone - Regan Property - Community Development Page 14 d) Preliminary 2005 Financials - Finance 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Adopt Resolution - 19Sth Street Extension to TH3 Project - Engineering b) Adopt Resolution - Authorize Advertisement for Bids Spruce Street Extension Project - Engineering c) Snow Removal Policy - Sidewalks on Ash Street - Engineering 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 7a- COUNCIL MINUTES PRE-MEETING February 6, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 6:30 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Joel Jarnnik, City Attorney; Robin Roland, Acting City AdministratorlFinance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant 2. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA Councilmember Fogarty pulled item 7a) Council Minutes to abstain. The dates for the goal setting workshop and the CouncillNewland workshop do not work for her. It was agreed to change the goal setting workshop to March 9,2006 at 5:30 for Council only and March 10,2006 at 8:00 a.m. for Council and staff. Council should submit items to Acting City Administrator Roland and she will prepare an agenda. The CouncillNewland workshop was changed to February 28,2006 at 5:30 p.m. \ Councilmember McKnight had a concern with the boundary adjustment for the Perkins property and asked with the Perkins property being in zone A how does that impact the work on the systems plan which was set up as a step in zone B. City Engineer Mann replied as far as the systems plan, the Perkins property has always been a part of what was going to be served by Farmington. Councilmember McKnight was also concerned that the 210th Street issue has not been worked out with the Regan's, adding more traffic to highway 3, and the highway 3 connections as far as looking at 210th Street by itself, or the whole issue. He did not want to act on it tonight because of the 210th Street issue not being resolved. Mayor Soderberg explained in order to do the platting, 21 oth Street was one of the contingencies that Council wanted. 210th Street was to be done as a part of that project. This item will be pulled for discussion. ." .. . '. , Council Minutes (Pre-Meeting) February 6, 2006 Page 2 Councilmember Wilson asked about the new street for Hill Dee and if the map shows the new intersection or the current intersection. He also asked if parcels 45 and 55 are gaining more property because of the change in the intersection. City Engineer Mann stated staff was not planning on re-platting or vacating any of the right-of-way. The residents may have additional boulevard area, but they are not gaining any lot area. Currently Lower and Upper 1 82nd Street come together in a Y intersection. This will create a T intersection. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked about the ice resurfacer and an e-mail that was received. Acting City Administrator Roland explained there is a vendor that is not happy with the way the process was handled. However, it was handled according to state statutes as far as the bids. There were specific reasons for bidding the way we did. There is justification as to why the lowest bid was not acceptable. Councilmember Pritzlaff then asked about the budget for the 2006 Master Plan. He felt it was a lot of money to be put on the consent agenda. Parks and Recreation Director Distad explained that Council has seen this previously during the budget process and it has been in a public document. 5. STAFF COMMENTS Acting City Administrator Roland explained the supplemental items. 6. ADJOURN MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto adjourn at 6:49 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, //_;>L -P~ ')..-,...--, d./7 ~/-..vc Xc.d:- /' r /~.A./ c/ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant I COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR February 6, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Soderberg led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Audience: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Joel J amnik, City Attorney; Robin Roland, Acting City AdministratorlFinance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Lee Smick, City Planner; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Pam Hadler, Jada Braaten, John Kapustka, Dale Hansen 4. APPROVE AGENDA Councilmember Fogarty pulled item 7a) Council Minutes to abstain and items 71) Goal Setting Workshop and 7m) CouncillNewland Communities Workshop to change the dates. Councilmember McKnight pulled item 7q) Boundary Adjustment (Perkins) for further discussion. City Attorney Jamnik stated item lId) City Administrator update will be a verbal report. Acting City Administrator Roland stated the supplemental items are 7r) Additional Information on the Solid Waste Truck Bid and item lOc) Local Franchising Comments. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS a) Acknowledge Years of Service - Fire Chief Mayor Soderberg presented a plaque to Fire Chief Kuchera for 20 years of service as Fire Chief. He has served on the Fire Department for 35 years. b) Introduce Promoted Employee - Fire Department Acting City Administrator Roland introduced Mr. Tim Pietsch as the new Fire Chief. 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS Council Minutes (Regular) February 6, 2006 Page 2 7. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaffto approve the Consent Agenda as follows: b) Received Information Capital Outlay - Fire Department c) Approved Appointment Recommendation - Fire Department d) Approved Donating Used Equipment - Fire Department e) Approved Hiring Consultant 2006 Master Plan - Parks and Recreation f) Adopted RESOLUTION R12-06 Approving Bid Ice Resurfacer-Parks and Recreation Adopted RESOLUTION R13-06 Approving Bid Waste Containers and Lids- Parks and Recreation Received Information Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation Adopted RESOLUTION R14-06 Accepting Donation Rambling River Center- Parks and Recreation Approved Budget 2006 Master Plan - Parks and Recreation Received Information Capital Outlay - Public Works Approved School and Conference - Administration Adopted RESOLUTION R15-06 Approving Joint Powers Agreement with Burnsville/Contracted Street Services - Engineering Adopted JOINT RESOLUTION R16-06 Boundary Adjustment (Sauber)- Community Development Adopted RESOLUTION R18-06 Approving Bid for Solid Waste Truck - Parks and Recreation (Supplemental) s) Approved Bills APIF, MOTION CARRIED. g) h) i) j) k) n) 0) p) r) a) MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approved Council Minutes (1/17/06 Regular) and (1/18/06 Special). Voting for: Soderberg, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson. Abstain: Fogarty. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to approve Council Minutes (1/23/06 Special). APIF, MOTION CARRIED. I) Set Date Goal Setting Workshop - Administration This was changed to March 9,2006 at 5:30 p.m. for Council only and March 10, 2006 at 8:00 a.m. for Council and staff. m) Set CouncillNewland Communities Workshop - Administration This was changed to February 28,2006 at 5:30 p.m. q) Joint Resolution- Boundary Adjustment (Perkins) - Community Development Councilmember McKnight pulled this item due to the systems plans not being completed. City Engineer Mann had explained that it would not have an impact on the systems plan. Councilmember McKnight's biggest concern for not doing this was the 21 oth Street issue not being resolved. This leads into more issues with traffic on highway 3 and connections and therefore he was not comfortable with approving the annexation for the Perkins property. Council Minutes (Regular) February 6,2006 Page 3 Councilmember Wilson agreed, but had an additional concern that there were still issues to be worked out related to Cambodia Avenue, the Empire Town Board has approved the annexation in concept but has not voted to approve it. He felt the item was not ready for Council, but could be once these issues were resolved. He also did not support approving this item. Mayor Soderberg noted Councilmember Fogarty is on the EFPAC committee and the issues that concern the Town Board revolve around Cambodia Avenue. Councilmember Fogarty explained it is a matter of working out some boundary issues and road concerns which would have to be addressed even before a preliminary plat were brought to Council. This is to approve a joint resolution that was created at the EFP AC meeting between Empire Township and Farmington. This tells her that they are also ready for it. Without approving the resolution it will be very difficult for Empire to want to start to commit to platting the area and work out the Cambodia issues. They want to know that both the township and the City support the property coming into the City and that is the reason for the joint resolution. Community Development Director Carroll stated the portion of Cambodia Avenue next to the Perkins property, beyond the boundaries of the Perkins property, is owned by the township. It was turned back to the township after it was no longer a county road. There is not a dispute about this, there were just some uncertainties regarding ownership. The township is in favor of the idea of improving what is now a township road at someone else's expense. There are benefits to existing property owners in the township and to future township property owners who may want to develop. Staff would propose that if the road is constructed that they look at agreeing to the annexation of that piece of property at a later time. The City would take over the maintenance of the road since it connects to an existing City road. He did not see a lot of controversy, it just takes time to work out the details. An agreement has been worked out with how other roads are maintained. Mayor Soderberg asked what this does with regard to the 210th Street issue to extend it to highway 3. Community Development Director Carroll stated there is a connection that is needed from highway 3 to the east. It is located between CR66 and hwy 50 and makes it an ideal place to get traffic through and for a signalized intersection. This connection would be important to the development of the Devney/Winkler properties in the future. There is a window of opportunity to get that portion of roadway done because there are plans in place for the Perkins property and discussions regarding the former bus garage property. Staff would not like to miss this opportunity. Councilmember Pritzlaff clarified if this is not approved, then they cannot work on the issues. Councilmember Fogarty stated there would be a concern that annexation would become an issue. Community Development Director Carroll stated once the plat was received and staff started looking at ownership issues, then it became clear there were these uncertainties so staff began working on this Council Minutes (Regular) February 6, 2006 Page 4 immediately. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated he has followed this in the Planning Commission meetings and it gets to this point and it is a dead stop. He noted this property is not approved for MUSA. Staff explained that for zone A properties the process was to get a concept plan approved, get annexation approved, and then move on to MUSA. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated if this is approved and the issues with the roads will be worked out, but MUSA is not approved, how does that affect it? Community Development Director Carroll stated the City does not have the authority to grant MUSA to properties that are not in the City. Councilmember Wilson stated he does not oppose this, but there seems to be a lot ofloose ends he would like to see clarified through the township's attorney relative to the road and the boundaries. Mayor Soderberg noted this will be the trigger to get those things done. City Attorney J amnik stated the proposed annexation is for lots 1 and 2, block 2, it is a platted area that is being brought in. The resolution does not expand on the boundaries from what the City received from the petition. In the normal course we would propose to just annex what was received in the petition and no more, but in this situation, the township owns some ofthe underlying land that Cambodia Avenue is over and is east of the proposed lots. The City would expect that the township upon receipt of this proposed joint resolution may say it makes sense for the City to annex more than the petition for property. We would be consistent with past practice of annexing what people requested and no more and allowing the township to suggest that we should have the boundaries farther east than what is proposed in the petition. The next EFPAC meeting is February 15, 2006. It will come before the Empire Town Board on February 14, 2006. Staff plans to present information on the research that has been done before then. Staff will provide a proposal as to whether or when the roadway would be annexed and discuss the maintenance issue. The township is looking for some indication that the City is serious about pursuing this. Councilmember McKnight asked if the Perkins have made any progress with discussions with the Regan's on 210th Street. Staff was not aware if the Perkins developer was talking to Mr. Regan. They are looking to the City to get the right-of-way necessary to make the connection. Mr. Regan has applied for a Comp Plan amendment for the property and for zoning and various other things. Staff intends to recommend to the Planning Commission that the land use approvals be contingent on the right-of-way being provided. Councilmember McKnight stated last year he said he would not support this unless the 21 Oth Street issue was worked out. He does not want another Devney/Winkler property where we annex and it just sits there with nothing happening. He does not want to annex the Perkins property if that will be the case. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated he had reservations, but this seems like the next step. He would have liked to have seen more progress. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Pritzlaffto adopt JOINT RESOLUTION R17- 06 regarding a boundary adjustment involving 17.09 acres of property owned by Council Minutes (Regular) February 6,2006 Page 5 Neil and Linda Perkins. Voting for: Soderberg, Fogarty, Pritzlaff. Voting against: McKnight, Wilson. MOTION CARRIED. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Therapeutic Massage License - Administration Ms. Jada Braaten has applied for a therapeutic massage license for Hadler Family Chiropractic at 625 8th Street. MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaffto close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve the therapeutic massage license for J ada Braaten at 625 8th Street. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Liquor License Violation - B&B Pizza - Police Department At the January 3, 2006 meeting there was a misperception of some statements made by one of the co-owners of B&B Pizza and the penalty was mistakenly reduced. This hearing is to reconsider the penalty. Staff recommended the original penalty of a $500 fine and 7 days suspension be invoked as the result of the sale of an alcoholic beverage to a person under the age of 21. Mr. Dave Eldridge, B&B Pizza, stated apparently there was some misunderstanding last time and he wanted to clear it up. He was not sure what the misunderstanding was. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated from his perspective Mr. Eldridge made it sound like he was the sole owner. Mr. Eldridge stated some of the confusion might have come when he said he bought out the other partners. He bought out Betty and Mark Goldberg. He did not mean to say he bought the entire business. Right now he is two thirds owner. Ms. Kim Kamen is the other partner. Mayor Soderberg stated at the last hearing the penalty was to suspend the license for three days. Police Chief Siebenaler stated it was for three days and a $250 fine consistent with other first time violators. The original penalty recommended was a $500 fine and 7 days suspension. The 7 day suspension would take place the first week of March. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated at the last meeting they discussed consecutive violations. In this case the violations skipped a year. Police Chief Siebenaler stated this is the third consecutive violation over a four year period with a continuous owner. Mr. Eldridge asked now that he is a majority owner, does that change the facts. Council agreed this did not change the facts. Councilmember Fogarty stated she would be inclined to treat it as a third violation. She felt it was not deliberate, but she felt deliberately mislead. Mr. Eldridge gave the Council the impression that he was the sole proprietor and it does not set well with her. He heard the discussion and the reason the Police Chief changed his mind was because Mr. Eldridge was a new owner. She felt it was very clear they all understood Mr. Eldridge to be the new sole proprietor which did change the facts. The fact that Mr. Eldridge did not correct that is deceiving. Mr. Eldridge state ifhe did not correct something it was because this is his first time. As far as saying he bought out the partners, he did. It was Betty and Mark Goldberg. He felt that is where the confusion comes in. Council Minutes (Regular) February 6,2006 Page 6 Councilmember Pritzlaff stated when Mr. Eldridge bought out the other people he should have talked to the other partner about previous violations. He would agree with the penalty for a third violation. Councilmembers Wilson and McKnight supported staff's recommendation. MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaffto close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to re-instate the original penalty of a $500 fine and 7 days suspension of the liquor license for B&B Pizza. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Amend Ordinance - Off-Street Retail Parking - Community Development Staff proposed to amend the parking standards for retail facilities. At the November 8, 2006 Planning Commission meeting they directed staff to review parking standards for surrounding communities to determine if an amendment would be warranted. This is due to Pedersen Ventures requesting a variance from the off-street parking requirements for phase 1 of Vermillion River Crossings. They were short 36 parking spaces under the current code which states one off- street parking space is required for each 200 sq. ft. of floor area, plus one additional for each employee. After reviewing ordinances from other cities, staff proposed an amendment to the ordinance which states at least one off-street parking space for each 200 sq. ft. of floor area up to a total floor area of 10,000 sq. ft.; at least one off-street parking space for each 250 sq. ft. of floor area in a building of 10,001 - 30,000 sq. ft.; at least one off-street parking space for each 300 sq. ft. of floor area in a building with more than 30,000 sq. ft. The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal and recommended sending it to Council. The proposed standard lessens the amount of parking as the overall size of the retail facility increases. If the ordinance amendment were approved, the variance for Vermillion River Crossing could be withdrawn as they would be providing an excess of three parking spaces. Councilmember Fogarty had some concerns. In looking at other cities, we are looking at ones that require the least amount of parking. She would like to make it simpler and would rather give Vermillion River Crossings a variance than amend the code. In other areas of development, there might be enough room to require more parking. Acting City Administrator Roland stated although this benefits the Vermillion River Crossings project, staffhas been discussing this for quite awhile with regard to all developments in the City. There have been a few more parking spaces in the parking lots than were necessary such as City Center. Councilmember Fogarty agreed with that, however, the Marketplace could have used a few more parking spaces due to the types of businesses. MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to adopt ORDINANCE 006-548 amending the required parking standards for retail facilities. Voting for: Soderberg, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson. Voting against: Fogarty. MOTION CARRIED. Council Minutes (Regular) February 6, 2006 Page 7 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Adopt Resolution - Hill Dee Reconstruction Project Feasibility Report - Engineering Council requested this report to determine the feasibility of improving the streets and utilities within the Hill Dee neighborhood. The improvements will serve property owners along Upper and Lower 182nd Street W, Euclid Avenue and Fayade Avenue. The improvements would include reconstruction of the street, sanitary sewer, water main and construction of a storm drainage system. The street will be replaced at the same width, 32 ft. There will be reconfiguration of the intersection of Lower and Upper 182nd Street which currently has a Y configuration. This will be changed to a T intersection. There is a proposed sidewalk around the Hill Dee Park that would tie into the trail along Pilot Knob. There is also a sidewalk proposed along a section of Upper 1 82nd Street as a trail is planned to lead to the Daisy Knoll area. Catch basins would be added for a storm drainage system. The sanitary sewer system would also be replaced. Staff did look at installing fiber optic cabling during this project. The cost to install conduit along the streets in front of all the homes was about $115,000 - $120,000. This did not include the fiber. Staff decided to do more research to determine the right approach. Mayor Soderberg agreed it might make sense to look at an overall plan for the entire City. He noted staff is also looking at wireless connectivity. However, putting down fiber to the premises it becomes a City-owned infrastructure, then the internet providers, cable TV providers, telephone providers all run over the same infrastructure and compete on a level playing field. He felt fiber to the premises is the direction we should go, but we need a better understanding of the system. Staffwill be attending a workshop with the county to obtain more information. As far as the storm sewer system, staff looked at extending a storm sewer pipe to the south of Upper 1 82nd Street to one of the backyards that are adjacent to Everton Court. There is a concrete swale that takes all the drainage off of Everton Court to direct the water further down the swale. Occasionally staff still needs to clean out this area from debris from the street. Staff has told residents this would be reviewed during the reconstruction. The proposal is to directional drill a storm sewer pipe up to that area and install a catch basin to take the water out of the backyards. The cost would be $90,000. Based on the assessment policy those residents would need to be assessed. This will not be included in the project at this time, but staff wanted to make Council aware of this situation. The total estimated project cost is $2,891,000. According to the assessment policy the reconstructed street and lateral utilities would be assessed to the benefiting properties at a rate of 35% ofthe improvement costs. Assessment to the benefiting properties for new lateral street and utility costs are calculated at 100% of improvement cost. The storm sewer would be in that category. Trunk Council Minutes (Regular) February 6, 2006 Page 8 utilities are funded through the City's trunk funds. The City cannot assess more than the benefit the property receives for the improvements. Staff will be reviewing the benefit appraisal. MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaff adopting RESOLUTION R19-06 accepting the feasibility report, calling for a public hearing for March 20, 2006 and authorizing preparation of plans and specifications. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Adopt Resolution - 2006 Seal Coat Project Feasibility Report - Engineering The seal coat project is implemented in a seven-year cycle. Staff outlined the streets that will be included in this project. The total cost is $180,430. The assessment policy indicates a 50/50 split between the City and the benefiting properties. The estimated assessment is $61.00 per residential equivalent unit. The first notice residents will receive will include the neighborhood meeting along with the notice for the public hearing for March 6, 2006. The next notice is the assessment hearing notice in the fall. Staff is looking at ways to make the notice as clear as possible. MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaffto adopt RESOLUTION R20-06 accepting the feasibility report, scheduling the public hearing for March 6, 2006 and authorizing preparation of plans and specifications. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Local Franchising Comments - Administration The Apple Valley, Farmington and Rosemount Cable and Telecommunications Commission is requesting that each of their City Council's respond to a Call to Action by the National Association of Telecommunications Officer and Advisors to file comments to the FCC regarding local cable franchising. These comments are requested because of an FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking which asserts that franchising of cable services by local governments may be an unreasonable barrier to entry for new telecommunications providers. Therefore, the FCC is requesting local governments comment on what can be done to ensure that local franchising authorities do not umeasonably refuse to award cable franchises to competitive entrants. The deadline for filing comments is February 13, 2006. The comments request that the FCC not interfere with local franchising authority for existing franchises or new competitive franchises. MOTION by McKnight, second by Soderberg to approve the submission of comments on behalf of the City to the FCC on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding competitive franchising. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Adopt Ordinance Amendment - Schedule of Presumed Penalties - Police Department The Council requested staff to draft a matrix of presumed penalties so the liquor licensees know in advance what the penalty will be for liquor license violations. The matrix listed a variety of violations and what the penalty would be for the first, second, third and fourth violation. They are presented in a manner that will allow for a number of violations within a given number of years, regardless ofthe number of compliance checks conducted. The penalties are within state Council Minutes (Regular) February 6,2006 Page 9 guidelines. The City may impose a penalty up to $2,000 or 60 days suspension or a combination of those two. Staff recommended that violations remain consistent with the past but become more rigorous as the violations accumulate to the point where a fourth violation in a period of four years or less would result in the revocation of a liquor license. This ordinance allows Council to review the severity of the violation and make a judgment as to what an appropriate penalty would be. This proposed ordinance has been sent to all liquor license holders. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson adopting ORDINANCE 006-549 adopting presumptive civil penalties for on-sale liquor licensees that violate state laws or City ordinances. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Consider Tree Preservation Standards - Community Development A tree preservation ordinance was approved in 2002 after the Vermillion Grove development was completed. Staff presented a map showing the number of trees lost in that development. We protect our wetlands, our steep slopes, our drainage ways, our rivers, etc. Why don't we protect our forested areas? Staff is bringing this forward as a maintenance review for this ordinance. Staff reviewed the current ordinance. Staff is suggesting looking at custom-graded lots and do a tree inventory or an overlay zone. If Council is interested in a tree preservation ordinance, staff would go back to the Planning Commission and start writing the ordinance. Staff asked if the ordinance should be limited to new development or new development and existing development including privately-owned residential properties. The next issue is should the ordinance be triggered by the submission of any new development application or a property owner's or developer's desire to remove any trees identified by a previously-conducted tree inventory or protected by a related overlay zone. Mr. Leon Orr also sent an e-mail giving his views regarding a tree preservation ordinance. Councilmember Fogarty felt the ordinance should be limited to new development. If a tree inventory can be done quickly she would be in favor of it. Police Chief Siebenaler felt large areas of trees could be identified in an afternoon. Councilmember Fogarty liked the idea of custom lots. Mayor Soderberg asked if there was a way of mandating the developers do custom lots. He was struggling with what is the compelling government interest in regulating trees. They are a renewable resource. In public areas he felt we should do all we can to maintain forests, but he was struggling with private land. Councilmember Wilson supported looking at new residential properties and would like to communicate the benefit of trees to existing property owners. He would also support doing a quick tree inventory. Councilmember Pritzlaffwas in favor of enforcing this for new development and doing a tree inventory. He would like to look at developable acres before they come up for development. Mr. John Kapustka, 19482 Evening Star Way, agreed we need to do everything we can to preserve our trees. The irony of the names of developments- Vermillion Grove - and they de-forest it. In Charleswood the trees were gutted. Along Akin Road another area of trees was leveled. We cannot let this keep Council Minutes (Regular) February 6, 2006 Page 10 happening. We have people on staff who have the knowledge and the passion and we would be remiss if we did not let them set the course and bring people along and educate them. It is better to err on the side of preservation than throwaway our heritage. Let's err on the side of saving the trees. It takes a long time to replace something that is blown down in a storm. You do not get that same canopy back in ten years. You can tell how old the neighborhoods are by how old the trees are. In every new neighborhood they de-forest it and it does not look like the rest of town. Police Chief Siebenaler stated this is something he has a deep and abiding interest in. The Mayor had asked where is the compelling government reason to interfere with the rights of a property owner. There are certain things that transcend the rights of any individual property owner. We would not allow a property owner to create a toxic waste dump on his own property, because he will not be the property owner forever. In areas of wildlife management we would not allow a person to completely fish out a stream that is on their land. We would not allow a property owner to clean out the trout in the Vermillion River that passes through their property. There are areas in this City that are subject to imminent development that are home to stands of oak trees for 160 years. Those trees transcend the right of any individual property owner and we have an obligation to preserve that kind of heritage as long as we possibly can. Development will occur, but doesn't a City have an obligation to look out for all of its residents, current and future, instead of a transient developer moving through. There are areas available to plant a stand of black walnut trees for future harvesting. Three or four generations later a decision may be made to harvest them. In order to do that someone has to protect it in the meantime, otherwise it is just sawdust. There are limited resources left in the City subject to this kind of preservation. Councilmember Pritzlaffnoted with the Mattson Farms development there were trees there that were not very large, but now there is a pond with no trees around it. He wants more than boulevard trees to replace what was taken down. Councilmember McKnight agreed with Mayor Soderberg and also had a concern with property rights. When writing the ordinance, staff will keep property rights in mind. c) Snow Removal Policy - Sidewalks on Ash Street - Engineering Staff has attempted to contact all the property owners along Ash Street regarding the proposed snow removal policy. Staff has not been able to contact two owners, but have received positive responses from 10 owners and of those have obtained four signed easements. Staff will continue to try to contact the last two owners and will continue to work on obtaining signed easements. The existing policy will be enforced until all 12 easements are signed. d) City Administrator Update - City Attorney City Attorney J amnik had hoped he would have a draft agreement for Council. After several weeks of negotiations we remain apart on several substantive terms Council Minutes (Regular) February 6, 2006 Page 11 with the preferred candidate. At this point he has offered the City's maximum position to the candidate in terms of salary and benefits. He asked Mr. Herlofsky on Saturday ifhe would take the City's last best final offer and provide a counter offer to that so the Council could determine tonight just how far apart they remain. This has not been received yet, but it may come in the next day or two. At this point, Attorney Jamnik was relatively certain it would not match the maximum authority he has been provided by the Council and consequently he needed direction from the Council to either increase the offer he has been authorized to make or to discontinue negotiations at this point and look at other options. He does not believe at this point we are likely to reach closure anytime soon. Mayor Soderberg noted it is disappointing we have not been able to reach a closure. He feels we have offered what we can offer and it might be better to withdraw the offer and start looking at the options. This is difficult given the amount of time and energy everyone has put into this. Councilmember McKnight noted Attorney Jamnik asked for a final counter offer. He hoped that could be reviewed to see if it is close. Mayor Soderberg agreed that is fair. Attorney Jamnik did not believe there is sufficient majority support of the Council to increase the offer beyond what he already has. In some respects he has exceeded Council's authority particularly in the moving expenses. The max Council had indicated was $5,000 and he has offered $7,500. In all other respects he is at the maximum or close to it from Council's direction. Without additional authority he cannot bridge the gap at this point. Unless he sees some movement back, he feels we are at our last best offer. Councilmember Fogarty agreed. She stated she is terribly disappointed. Attorney Jamnik stated he will inform Mr. Herlofsky of this and ask for his final offer and do the final comparison and report to Council. Councilmember Wilson asked if we could ask for a deadline for a response. Attorney J amnik replied yes, his understanding is that we will see it tomorrow or no later than Wednesday and he will inform Mr. Herlofsky ofthis. 12. NEWBUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Councilmember Fogarty: The Community Center Steering Committee had their last meeting and will bring a recommendation to Council at the j oint meeting on February 15, 2006. She appreciated the committee's hard work. She serves on the Vermillion River Watershed Commission and starting April 16, 2006 there will be new restrictions on the Vermillion River according to the DNR. They have decided to allow the use of any type of bait, it is catch and release for all trout in the designated areas with the exception from Denmark to TH3 where you can catch and keep. Councilmember McKnight: Thanked everyone involved with the Community Expo. Council Minutes (Regular) February 6, 2006 Page 12 Councilmember Wilson: He also enjoyed the Expo and appreciated the hard work. Police Chief Siebenaler: Community Education is holding a demonstration on the use of drug dogs. This is a demonstration of what the Police Department intends to do. This is a requirement before drug sniffing dogs can be used in public schools. The City will now begin using canines for drug enforcement in the schools. Parks and Recreation Director Distad: On February 15, 2006 there will be a Joint Workshop between the Council and the Park and Rec Commission. City Engineer Mann: The MN Office of Pipeline Safety has recently helped facilitate legislation that has increased the City's responsibility in locating public/private water and sewer services. The City will be required to locate the services within two feet. For the sewer services, staff is changing the detail plates and the types of construction builders will have to do to allow the City to locate these services. This will be required for new construction starting January 1, 2006. Information will be sent to builders and Council. Mayor Soderberg: He received a letter from the MN Mayor's Association asking for his participation in membership and at a conference in April. Council had no objection. He also received a letter from Mr. Vem Wilcox, co-Chair ofthe Noise Oversight Committee. They make recommendations to the Metropolitan Airports Commission on issues of airline operation and noise abatement. With the new runway a number of communities have received complaints from residents. There is a meeting Wednesday to hear and consider requests for additional membership. Councilmember Pritzlaffwill join the committee, however he cannot make the meeting. Mayor Soderberg will attend the meeting. Councilmembers received an invitation from Dakota Electric to attend the Partners in Progress on March 8, 2006 at Royal Cliff. Those who wish to attend should advise staff. Council recessed into executive session at 9:50 to discuss ISD 192 litigation. 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Discuss ISD 192 Litigation 15. ADJOURN Respectfully submitted, C;;~~m~ )774~ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 13, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Soderberg called the meeting to order at 5 :43 p.m. 2. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by McKnight, second by Fogarty to approve the agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. CONSIDERATION OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRACT City Attorney Jamnik presented to Council the agreement with Peter Herlofsky for City Administrator. Employment will begin in 90 days, there is a 6-month severance pay schedule, starting salary will be $100,000 which is the annual salary maximum Council had posted, but it does provide for increases over the next few years to $120,000 annual salary at the beginning or end of the third year however the schedule works. The sick and vacation leave is a little less than cities normal policies for seniority but cumulative it will give more flexibility because it constitutes personal leave rather than a categorized vacation and sick leave. The rest of the document is similar to previous contracts. The moving expense was set at $10,000 which is more than Council had seen previously. As far as the start date, it is 90 days out, but he will try to appear faster than that. There are some options Attorney Jamnik will present at the next Council meeting for the goal- setting retreat. Mr. Herlofsky is checking his schedule to see ifhe can make it for the retreat as it is scheduled. Mayor Soderberg asked if Attorney J amnik discussed the cell phone allowance with Mr. Herlofsky. Attorney Jamnik stated the contract includes a $25 stipend for a cell phone. Mr. Herlofsky will discuss this more when he starts but he prefers to have the stipend and use his own phone. Attorney Jamnik explained to him that the general practice is to have the Nextel phone provided by the City, but he preferred to have this in the contract as well. One of his concerns is co-mingling personal calls with business calls and that is a little easier to do with a stipend than with a City phone. Mayor Soderberg asked if the cost to provide a phone to Mr. Herlofsky would be greater than $25 ifhe had a City phone. Administrative Services Director Shadick replied the monthly fee would be $36 for a City phone. Mayor Soderberg noted this is a better deal for the City. Attorney Jamnik noted it depends on the type of phone and how compatible it is with the City system. Mr. Herlofsky will discuss this when he starts. Mayor Soderberg stated he wants the consideration to be consistent with what they advertised. It soon became apparent that it might be difficult to conclude this had we stopped at $100,000. He has been told that we would probably have to pay $115,000 - $120,000 for this type of candidate. In order to maintain consistency with what was advertised and to get his type of candidate he personally views this as starting him at what his worth would be but doing it over a period of three years, as opposed to looking at it as step increases. Special Council Meeting February 13, 2006 Page 2 Councilmember McKnight stated as far as the salary, he feels we have met all of the goals with the $100,000 start. The third year stays within the current top of the scale and with the salary cap change this year for City and County Administrators these numbers will be right in the ballpark each of these years. He had no qualms about this. It is a lot of money, but that is what it costs to get a good Administrator. He was very comfortable with the salary. Councilmember Fogarty thanked Attorney Jamnik for his hard work on this. She realized it was a tough negotiation. Councilmember Pritzlaff referred to some e-mailsfromAttorneyJamnik.mainly the last one where this salary increase was set whether there is a satisfactory performance review or not. Attorney Jamnik replied that is correct, however this contract remains terminable. It is an all or nothing type of situation. If the Council does not view his performance as satisfactory, Council's choice will be hard. It will be to terminate the contract or to give him the increase. Part of this was negotiated in light of the low starting salary compared to what his existing salary is as well as the progression up to that amount. We did compromise between a $100,000 start and a higher start. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated his problem with that is if the performance review does not come back satisfactory but does not warrant termination we have nothing in the contract looking at giving a certain amount of that. Attorney J amnik replied that is correct. You have to give it to him or re- negotiate the agreement. Mayor Soderberg stated the other alternative would be to start him out at a higher salary initially. He had a problem with doing that because we advertised at a certain rate. His view is that we are starting him at a higher salary but we are doing it incrementally over a period of time. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated his other issue is that the $120,000 will be after the second year, so during his third year he will be at $120,000 - from $100,000 six months later to $105,000 to another six months later to $110,000 and then after the second year. He would rather have seen the top at $115,000 after the second year. The other issue is the moving expense, that we are $5,000 higher than what we originally authorized Attorney Jamnik to offer him. At the last Council Meeting we were at $7500 which Attorney Jamnik commented that he went beyond Council's approval. We were at $2500 more than what was approved and now we are another $2500 more than that. Mr. Herlofsky is proposing this as moving expense but he is also writing it in there as realtor fees. Councilmember Pritzlaff was not comfortable paying any type of realtor fees on someone selling their house the way property values have increased. Councilmember Wilson stated it has been challenging since the August/September parting with Mr. Urbia. He appreciated Mayor Soderberg and Councilmember McKnight initially putting a lot of work in getting some good candidates and Attorney J amnik worked overtime to get us to the point we are at. Councilmember Wilson was not comfortable with the situation they arrived at. He knows we need a good quality, professional Administrator. He feels this individual, while he will do some good things for the City and has the capability and has demonstrated there is at least a 50% chance or better that the relationship between the City and the school district will improve under his leadership which that by itself would be a very positive thing for the City. Regarding the salary, $100,000 - $120,000 is consistent with our neighbors. When he applies for ajob within the first couple minutes he looks to the salary. Does the salary look like something he is comfortable with? Some people have declined pursuing ajob that was of Special Council Meeting February 13, 2006 Page 3 interest to them because the salary did not seem where they wanted it to be. He felt that is the situation we have here and the reason why we have the agreement structured the way we do. Normally when you move from one position to another you want to look at a 10% increase. Here he is looking at a 4% - 5% and so then the City is forced to give a 10% increase without any type of contingency on a satisfactory performance review. That is really tough for him to swallow. We have a lot of talented people that work for the City, the management team, all the way down to the mechanics, the parks and recreation people, everyone. They are looking at 2.75% annual increases. To look at 10%, he feels even though it is a different category of an employee, you could argue the Administrator is one of the most important employees, 10% could be reasonably viewed by other employees as aren't I as valuable an employee to the City and I am only getting a 2.75% increase. There are some possibilities of creating that type of division. He does not wish for that to happen and does not think it will happen. For all the positive things about Mr. Herlofsky, his resume shows, and he stated during his interviews that he likes to move to different opportunities and during the course of his tenure, probably within the first three years, might interview for other positions. That is his prerogative to do so. His resume suggests a 3-5 year pattern with various organizations. The City is at a little bit of risk here. He hoped that would not happen. He is 100% behind the Council. This is a team decision, but he does not like the built in increases without the performance review. Granted it is acknowledged there is a performance review prior to approval ofthe annual budget. There is also a $10,000 moving expense. He believes Mr. Herlofsky is more interested in coming to the Twin Cities area and has a passion for being in this area as opposed to being in Farmington. He hoped he is wrong and on every count he is making. These are the reasons he will be voting against the contract. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated he will also vote no on the agreement. There is too much that he does not think is fair to the City itself. He is not willing to give this much of the City to one person coming in. He will stand 100% behind Mr. Herlofsky if he is the City Administrator. He believed he would be a good Administrator, but the numbers in this agreement and what has lead him to this, money wise and contract wise he cannot see this being a good move for the City. He sees this as giving a lot ofthe City away. He will support Mr. Herlofsky ifhe becomes the City Administrator, but he will not support his agreement. MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to approve the agreement with Mr. Peter Herlofsky for City Administrator. Voting for: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight. Voting against: Pritzlaff, Wilson. MOTION CARRIED. City Attorney Jamnik stated he will have the Mayor sign the contract and send it to Mr. Herlofsky. The notice he has to provide will be put into Crow Wing County this week. So the offer is conditioned on him leaving in contractually good standing with the county and notifying them appropriately. Councilmember Fogarty asked about information on the retreat. Attorney J amnik stated Mr. Herlofsky will be traveling during the time scheduled for the goal-setting retreat. Attorney Jamnik was trying to find an alternate time if one is available for a follow-up. There may still be a benefit for the Council to meet, even if Mr. Herlofsky is not there, but he would possibly be available before his official start date to come the third week of April. Attorney J amnik will check on availability with Council and staff and will bring back dates at the February 21, 2006 Council meeting. Special Council Meeting February 13, 2006 Page 4 4. ADJOURN MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to adjourn at 6:02 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, Cjp4'~~L~ ?Y7 ?C~,.g;~ ;7 Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mo.us 76 /. TO: Mayor, Councihnembers and Acting City Administrator '~ FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Gambling Event Permit - St. Michael's Church DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION St. Michael's Church is requesting a Gambling Event Permit for their annual Spring Fundraiser and Fall Festival. DISCUSSION Per State Statute 349.166 and pertinent City Code, a Gambling Event Permit must be issued by the City for this type of event. An application has been received, along with the appropriate fees. The City Attorney has reviewed the application and the attached resolution approving the request. BUDGET IMPACT Gambling fees are included in the revenue estimates of the budget. ACTION REQUESTED Consider the attached Resolution granting a Gambling Event Permit to St. Michael's Church at 22120 Denmark Avenue, on May 3,2006 and September 15-17, 2006. Respectfully submitted, p~;'~ /I ~C{d'c~:t Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director RESOLUTION NO. R -06 APPROVING A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR CHURCH OF ST. MICHAEL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 5t day of February 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, pursuant to M.S. 349.166, the State of Minnesota Gambling Board may not issue or renew a Gambling Event Permit unless the City Council adopts a Resolution approving said permit; and, WHEREAS, the Church ofSt. Michael's has submitted an application for a Gambling Event Permit to be conducted at 22120 Denmark Avenue for Council consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Farmington City Council that the Gambling Event Permit for the Church ofSt. Michael's to be conducted at the 22120 Denmark Avenue, is hereby approved. This resolution adopted by recorded vote ofthe Farmington City Council in open session on the 215t day of February 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of February 2006. Acting City Administrator SEAL City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us , / .' ,,-/ TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City Administrator \) FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Temporary On-Sale Liquor License - St. Michael's Church DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION St. Michael's Church is requesting a Temporary on-sale Liquor License for a Fish Fry, to be held March 10, 2006. DISCUSSION This event will be held on St. Michael's property located at 22120 Denmark Ave. Per, State Statute, a Temporary Liquor license must first be approved by the City and then forwarded to the State for approval. BUDGET IMPACT A City fee has not been established for a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License. Per the Liquor Control Commission, the State of Minnesota waives all fees for Temporary Liquor Licenses for non-profit organizations. Therefore, no license fee is proposed at this time. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the attached application for a Temporary Liquor License for St. Michael's Church, 22120 Denmark Ave., for their Fish Fry, March 10,2006. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~. ." /J II., _II ' L v'/t)~J--ztc t (. xji'\ C(urX~~~ Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director ?~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us ?d TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City AdministratortY FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Schedule Interviews - Rambling River Center Advisory Board DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION A vacancy exists on the Rambling River Center Advisory Board. The term for this appointment is from February 1, 2006 through January 31,2009. DISCUSSION On January 7, 2006, the City Council conducted interviews for various boards and commissions appointments. Due to a lack of applications at that time, one term on the Rambling River Center Advisory Board remained unfilled. Since then two applications. ' have been received for the Rambling River Center Advisory Board. If Council wishes to interview the applicants at the March 6, 2006 Pre-Council meeting staffwill contact the applicants and schedule the interviews. ACTION REQUIRED Schedule Rambling River Center Advisory Board interviews for the Pre-Council meeting on March 6, 2006, at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, /f;..Hi ;f .jlu~d~~_ Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council members FROM: Robin Roland, Acting City AdministratorlFinance Director SUBJECT: School & Conference - Finance Department DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION Attendance at the National Government Finance Officers Association Conference held May 6-10 in Montreal is being planned. DISCUSSION This annual event for Government Finance Officers within provides a look at issues affecting government finance on the national scale. This year's theme is "A Century of Progress in Government Finance" and topics to be covered include Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting, Budgeting and financial planning, Cash Management and Investing, Debt Management and Technology and Digital Government. This conference qualifies as continuing education for professional finance personnel. In addition, in my role as secretary of the Minnesota GFOA, my attendance at the National conference helps coordinate the Minnesota membership in attendance there. BUDGET IMPACT The adopted 2006 budget includes funding of $350 registration fees for this conference. ACTION REQUIRED This memo is for Council's information only. Respectfully submitted, // /'// ... ./~/:' 1//,./ (!k / ../ l.'-;/t'/~''-. /'. ;.- .-'-'--~Y'( , ,/ . ~ ( Robin Roland Acting City AdministratorlFinance Director k City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7f TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and Acting City Administrator t FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Appointment Recommendation -Police DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of a full-time Police Officer, to fill a vacancy in the Police Department, has been completed. DISCUSSION After a thorough review by the Police Department and the Human Resources Office, an offer of employment has been made to Mr. Nathaniel Siem. Mr. Siem is currently a police officer for the City of Cannon Falls. He is a senior member of that department, has served as a trainer and mentor to junior officers and has been referred to as the "go-to guy" by Chief Harve Byron. Mr. Siem meets or exceeds the minimum qualifications for this position. BUDGET IMPACT This position is provided for in the 2006 proposed budget. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the appointment of Mr. Nathaniel Siem as a Police Officer in the Police Department, effective February 28, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, " . .,,~~. -xc' //, /1- :--::j~_ ~_~~.cC--,...-1:-(../..."{ '.- .... c. ,>+.. '--- , Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Director ,~ cc: file City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us ~ TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and Acting City Administrator ~;-,/ FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Appointment Recommendation - Parks and Recreation Department DATE: February 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of a full-time Facilities/Parks Maintenance Worker has been completed. DISCUSSION After a thorough review by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Human Resources Office, an offer of employment has been made to Mr. Nicholas Berra, subject to ratification by the City Council. Mr. Berra has a Bachelor's degree in Parks and Leisure Activities and is currently a maintenance worker for Ramsey County. He has experience in park maintenance, ice arena operations and general construction and meets the qualifications for this position. BUDGET IMPACT Funding for this position is authorized in the 2006 budget. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the appointment of Mr. Nicholas Berra as Facilities/Parks Maintenance Worker in the Department of Parks and Recreation effective on February 28,2006. Respectfully Submitted, /" ,//} ). .~ .. -. /,/,- - ;- ,/---......c fL. ,~..{;-.-......---' '--<...---:,....c.. /_-r;.-'_/'" Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Director cP.--- cc: file City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7.4 TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City Administrator ~,. / \.--/' \~ FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Approve Assessment Agreement - Ash Street Project DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION Vernon E. Johnson and Lucilla C. Johnson, 612 Ash Street, have petitioned for connection to the recently installed sanitary sewer and water on Ash Street. DISCUSSION Vernon E. Johnson and Lucilla C. Johnson, the owners of the property at 612 Ash Street, have requested that the connection fees for the sewer and water be assessed. Allowing the connection fees to be assessed is consistent with the City's practice of working with property owners that have annexed into the City. The proposed assessment agreement is attached. BUDGET IMPACT The amount that would be assessed for 612 Ash Street is $3,665.00. This amount will be assessed against the property over a ten year period accruing interest at the rate of five percent per annum. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the Assessment Agreements between the City of Farmington and Vernon E. Johnson and Lucilla C. Johnson, the owners of the property at 612 Ash Street. ~~~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT (Parcel ill 077750001001) THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made this _ day of December, 2005, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") with offices at 325 Oak Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024, and VERNON E. JOHNSON and LUCILLA C JOHNSON, whose address is 612 Ash Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024 ("Owners"). Recitals: A. The Owners own the real property located in Dakota County legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Subject Property"), also referred to as Parcel Identification number 077750001001; and B. The Subject Property shall be assessed costs, fees and charges associated with the sanitary sewer and water service connection to the Subject Property. The service connections of sanitary sewer and water benefit the Subject Property; and C. The actual costs, fees and charges to be assessed against the Subject Property ("Assessments") are set forth on Exhibit "B". NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Subject Property is hereby assessed by the City for the Assessments. The total Assessments are: $3,665.00. The foregoing amount shall be assessed against the Subject Property over a ten (10) year period accruing interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum. The Assessments shall not exceed the amounts set forth on Exhibit "B". 2. The Assessments shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed 1 by the City. The Owners, by signing this Agreement, acknowledge that all procedural and substantive objections to the Assessment are hereby waived unconditionally, such waiver includes any rights of Owners, their successors or assigns to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the Subject Property. The Owners further waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. ~ 429.081. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Kevan Soderberg, Mayor By: Robin Roland, Interim City Administrator ..~~~rz;Z~ (Owner) ~ ~ - /J (l~ Or ~J". /tt/'Yu/iUrz~'. (6W'ner) (// STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2005, by Kevan Soderberg and Robin Roland, the Mayor and Interim City Administrator ofthe City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA) il, () The foregoing instrument was ackno~ledged before ~~ tj1isf'7. day of L!.a02~;.~-<--, ,2005, by J::;;2Jl...t(~}lyf~1Z~;le>JUl<t~'(.-&ez::~j>,,,'~~/f~~,3crJ (/ , CYNTHIA A. MULLER NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expires 01.31.2010 C;;) .C"/ -. ~y;>7 ...' ..;/1~~ C/o /7~;7~-t!!g.-cJ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/cjh 3 EXHIBIT" A" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Subject Property: Lot 1, Block 1, VERNON E JOHNSON ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota 4 EXHIBIT "B" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT Ash Street Utility and Reconstruction Project Sewer and Water Utility Connection fees (Not including lateral benefit costs) Sewer Metro Sewer Availability Charge $ 1,450.00 City Sewer Availability Charge $ 410.00 Connection Permit Charge $ 70.00 Septic Abandonment Permit Charge $ 60.00 Total Sewer $ 1,990.00 Water Reserve Capacity Connection 0N AC) $ 720.00 Water Treatment Plant Fee $ 600.00 Water Meter (5/8) $ 285.00 Connection Permit Charge $ 70.00 Total Water $ 1 ,675.00 Total Both $ 3,665.00 5 7/ . City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: \L~G . Mayor, Council Members, I~ ~ft/ Interim City Administrator \ v\ FROM: Lee Smick, AICP City Planner SUBJECT: Amend Section 8-1-5 (A) 1 "Boulevards: Allowable Uses" of the City Code to include a reference to 10-6-10 (F) "Street Tree Species to be Planted" and (G) "Tree Maintenance on City Boulevards" . DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION The City of Farmington is proposing to amend Section 8-1-5 (A) 1 (Exhibit A) of the City Code pertaining to the allowable uses of boulevards in the City. The amendment includes the addition of Section 10-6-10 (F) & (G) (Exhibit B) of the City Code pertaining to the allowable street trees planted on City boulevards and maintenance for those trees. The amendment deals with the need to cross-reference the codes mentioned above. Section 2-9-11 is included in this document for your information (Exhibit C). DISCUSSION The Planning Commission recommended approval of the text amendment at its meeting on February 14,2006. The following Code amendment is proposed (new text is underlined): 8-1-5: Boulevards; Allowable Uses (A) No person shall install any structure or improvement or plant any materials in the City Boulevard except as follows: 1. Street trees as allowed under Section 2-9-11 and Section 10-6-10 (F) & (G). ACTION REQUESTED Adopt an Ordinance amending Section 8-1-5 (A) 1 "Boulevards: Allowable Uses" of the City Code to include a reference to 10-6-10 (F) "Street Tree Species to be Planted" and (G) "Tree Maintenance on City Boulevards". Respectfully Submitted, 7~~ ~ f'> ~ r};." , . ,,' ._0" ~___" ee Smick, AICP City Planner CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING IN SECTION 8-1-5 (A) 1 "BOULEVARD ALLOWABLE USES" OF THE CITY CODE TO INCLUDE A REFERENCE TO 10-6~10 (F) "STREET TREE SPECIES TO BE PLANTED" AND (G) "TREE MAINTENANCE ON CITY BOULEVARDS". THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 8-1-5 (A) 1 of the Farmington City Code is amended as follows by adding the following reference (new text is underlined): (A) No person shall install any structure or improvement or plant any materials in the City Boulevard except as follows: 1. Street trees as allowed under Section 2-9-11 and Section 10-6-10 (F) & (G). SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED this _day of , 2006, by the City Council ofthe City of Farmington. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Kevan Soderberg, Mayor ATTEST: By: Robin Roland, Acting City Administrator SEAL By: City Attorney Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,2006. 8-1-5: BOULEVARDS; ALLOWABLE USES: Page 1 of 1 6/(ll3l( A 8-1-5: BOULEVARDS; ALLOWABLE USES: (A) No person shall install any structure or improvement or plant any materials in the City boulevard except as follows: 1. Street trees as allowed under Section 2-9-11; 2. Sidewalks meeting minimum and maximum City design standards; 3. Driveways meeting minimum and maximum City design standards; 4. Annual or perennial flowers, shrubbery not exceeding three feet (3') in height; 5. Split rail fences; 6. Planters not exceeding two feet (2') in height or closer than three feet (3') from the back of the curb or paved surface; 7. Underground sprinkler systems; 8. Boulevard sod as specified in subsection 11-5-3(F); 9. Decorative rock and tree bark. (B) "City boulevard" shall be defined as the area between property lines on either side of all streets, avenues or ways within the City. (C) Before any digging occurs within a boulevard, the owner or persons performing the work shall contact Gopher State One Call at least forty eight (48) hours in advance of beginning the work. (D) The Public Works Director may remove or cause or order to be removed, any structure, improvement or planting which is in an unsafe condition, causes a safety hazard, or interferes with the performance of City operations or any public utilities. The City shall not be responsible for damages relating to the removal of such structures, improvement, or plantings. (Ord. 095-354, 5-15-95) http://66.ll3.l95.234/MN/Farmington/ll00l000000005000.htm 2/1012006 -r:; t:jJII!3r1 6 10-6-10: (F)Street Tree Species To Be Planted: 1. Official Street Trees: The following list constitutes the official street tree species for Farmington, Minnesota. No species other than those included in this list may be planted as street trees without written permission of the reforestation advisory commission. 2. Allowable Street Tree Species: Ash Burgesen Dakota centennial Kindred Marshalls Patmore Summitt Linden American Greenspire Redmond Sentry Maple Cleveland Crimson king Emerald lustre Emerald queen Fire dance Green mountain Majesty Northwood red Norway Schwedler Deborah Oak English Northern red Pin Swamp white Other Imperial honey locust Regal elm Skyline honey locust Sunburst honey locust Trees approved by city staff (a) Spacing: Boulevard street trees shall be installed at a minimum spacing of one tree for every forty feet (40') of street frontage. The trees need not be placed at even forty foot (40') intervals; however, they should be installed as close to forty feet (40') as possible along the street frontage, allowing for utilities, driveways and intersection visibility requirements. The boulevard trees shall be installed per the landscape plan. The developer is responsible for ensuring that the boulevard trees are planted per the landscape plan as required by the development contract. Special planting designs for boulevard street trees need to be approved by a landscape architect or the planning coordinator. (b) Distance From Curb And Sidewalk: Boulevard trees shall be planted in the center of the boulevard width between the property line and curb or the sidewalk and curb. The distance trees may be planted from curbs and sidewalks shall be no closer than three feet (3'). (c) Distance From Street Corners And Fireplugs: No street tree, landscape material or fences shall be located within the triangle of visibility, which is the area within a triangle created by measuring from a point on the curb or edge of the street closest to the center of the intersection, down the front curblines or edge or intersecting streets thirty feet (3D'), and connecting their end points with a straight line. No street tree shall be planted closer than ten feet (10') from any fireplug. (d) Utilities: No street tree may be planted within ten (10) lateral feet of any underground water line, sewer line, overhead or underground transmission line or other utility. Gopher State One shall be called to request locations of utilities. Only columnar street trees are allowed to be planted at least ten feet (10') from streetlights. (G)Tree Maintenance On City Boulevards: 1. The boulevard tree maintenance program is designed to prescribe various levels of maintenance to city trees located within city owned boulevards. (a) Planting Requirements: The city tree maintenance division will review all planting of trees and shrubs within city boulevards, defined as city owned rights of way. (b) Landscape Plan: Developers of subdivisions must submit a landscape plan to the planning division. The planning division will be responsible for approving appropriate tree plantings within city boulevards. (c) Addition To Plan: Trees planted by residents on the boulevards that are in addition to the tree plan must receive prior approval from the city tree maintenance division. (d) Trimming Requirements: The parks maintenance division will be responsible for all trimming of boulevard trees. As these trees are on city property, and are essentially and legally city property, they must be maintained by the city to ensure that they are properly trimmed for structural integrity and disease control measures. (e) Trimming Notification: Prior to trimming boulevard trees, affected residents will be notified of the trimming schedule by the city through the use of door "hangers" or tags. (f) Contact: Residents will need to contact the tree maintenance division when a boulevard tree needs trimming or inspection. (g) Height Standards: Trimming height standards must maintain a ten foot (10') clearance above any walkway and fourteen feet (14') above the roadway. These requirements provide clearance for walker, snow removal equipment and solid waste vehicles. (h) Brush From Pruning: The city will not collect any brush resulting from pruning or removal of trees or brush from private property. (i) Emergency Collection Of Brush: An emergency brush situation would occur when the public safety officer declares one to exist, then and only then will the city collect brush generated by residents on private property, as a one time emergency service. 2-9-11: INTERFERENCE WITH CITY REFORESTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION: Page 1 of 1 ~;<1!18rr 2-9-11: INTERFERENCE WITH CITY REFORESTATION ADVISORY /1 COMMISSION: ~ It shall be unlawful for any person to prevent, delay or interfere with the City Reforestation Advisory Commission, or any of its agents, while engaging in and about the planting, cultivating, mulching, pruning, spraying, or removing of any street trees, park trees, or trees on private grounds, as authorized by this Chapter. (Ord. 090-239, 12-17-1990; amd. Ord. 099- 441, 11-15-1999) http://66.113.l95.234/MN/Farmington/05009000000011000.htm 2/7/2006 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 1 L_u .-< I~ TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Robin Roland Acting City Administrator SUBJECT: Supplemental Agenda DATE: February 21,2006 It is requested the February 21,2006 agenda be amended as follows: CONSENT AGENDA ADD 7k) Appointment Recommendation - Administration - Human Resources Approve the appointment of Ms. Danielle Cahlander as the part-time CoIl1l1UlI1ication Specialist in the Administration Department. ~4:7; Robin Roland Acting City Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7;f TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and Acting City Administratorf%\~// Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director FROM: SUBJECT: Appointment Recommendation - Administration DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCITON The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of a part-time Communication Specialist, to fill a vacant position in the Administration Department, has been completed. DISCUSSION After a thorough review of all applicants for the part-time Communication Specialist by the Administration Department and Human Resources Office, a contingent offer of employment has been made to Ms. Danielle Cahlander, subject to ratification by the City Council. Ms. Cahlander has extensive experience in graphic design and communications. She has a Bachelor's Degree in Studio Arts and meets the qualifications for this position BUDGET IMPACT Funding for this position is authorized in the 2006 budget. RECOMMENDATION Approve the appointment of Ms. Danielle Cahlander in the Administration Department, effective February 27,2006. Respectfully Submitted, / . . J ./ '" C ," __<<'"-<,, .~--r:(~ / Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Director cc: file czra... City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City AdminiSlrator~( FROM: Jennifer Collova, Natural Resources specialist.~ SUBJECT: NPDES Phase II Annual Report DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION Staff will be presenting a summary of the City's NPDES Phase II Annual Report and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program from 2005. DISCUSSION As the Council is aware, the City of Farmington, as a small municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4), is required to implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) as part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II requirements. The permit requires an Annual Report, submittal to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and a presentation at a public hearing. Submittal of the report will follow the review and comment at the public hearing. The Annual Report includes the following information: - NPDES Phase II Overview SWPPP Overview Status of Compliance with Permit Conditions Appropriateness ofBMP's in the SWPPP Progress in achieving Measurable Goals The Annual Report must be submitted to the MPCA by June 30, 2006. BUDGET IMPACT The NPDES Phase II Program requirements are incorporated in the City's annual budget. ACTION REQUESTED For information only. ~ff Jennifer Collova Natural Resources Specialist cc: file lOa.. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and Interim City Administrator \Y Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: RE: Approve Community Center Study Summary Report DATE: February 21,2006 BACKGROUND Previously in April 2003, the City Council approved a request from the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) to assemble a Recreational Facilities Task Force. In February 2004, a Recreational Facilities Needs Study Report was completed that identified three key recommendations for the City Council to consider moving forward with. One of the key recommendations was to complete a community center study. Subsequently in August 2004, the City Council approved moving forward with completing a Community Center Feasibility Study and hired Ballard King to assist the City with this process. On May 2, 2005, the City Council accepted the Community Center Feasibility Study's Final Report and directed staff to research the costs of working with Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates (BRAA) staff to do a further study of a community center. On May 16, 2005 a request was made by PRAC and staffto hire BRAA to move forward with further studying a community center. Specifically the continued study of a community center was to address the following: 1. To develop a more detailed construction budget and preliminary design and site plan addressing the program spaces in a community center that have been identified in the CCFS Final Report. 2. Explore potential sites and then prioritize these sites. 3. Explore and facilitate potential partnership with different entities and make a recommendation concerning any possible partnerships. At its May 16, 2005 meeting, the City Council approved the request to use the services of BRAA to further study a community center and also appointed City Council members Christy Fogarty and Steve Wilson to be its representatives on the Community Center Study Committee (Committee). While staff initially thought that the process could be completed by September 2005, there seemed to be a consensus by City Council at its May 16th meeting to have the Committee take its time in completing the study. The City Council felt that the Committee should do the proper research so that appropriate information could be gathered so the City Council could make an informed decision regarding a referendum for a community center. DISCUSSION The Committee held their first meeting on June 9, 2005. As part of its kick off meeting, Committee members were introduced to the process that would be used to analyze and prioritize sites, partnerships and to develop a concept plan for a community center. Attached is Exhibit A that identifies Committee members. Over the next seven months five additional meetings occurred to create the information needed to bring back to the City Council for discussion and consideration. While it was initially thought that the process would only take a few months for the Committee to acquire the information needed, once the Committee began to do the research and complete the analysis of issues related to potential sites, partnerships and community center spaces, it became very evident that this process would take longer because of the complexities of the issues involved. There were seven sites identified initially that were reviewed by staff, committee and the consultant. A map ofthe seven sites is attached and is shown as Exhibit B. The analysis ofthese seven sites required that good background information be researched and provided including pictures of the sites, a soil analysis be completed and an analysis of each site's strengths and weaknesses. Then once this information was gathered, the Committee ranked each of the seven sites using a matrix developed by BRAA. Included with this memo and shown as Exhibit C is the matrix form that shows the final results of the Committee member's scores and the ranking of each site based on its total score. The Committee through a process of elimination developed its preferred site, which is a site located in the Newland Communities development. This preferred site is located northeast of the intersection of 195th Street North and future Diamond Path Road extension. There were 10 partnerships that were explored by the Committee and are identified in your packet as Exhibit D. The Consultant contacted each of the 10 possible partners to gauge their level of interest in being a financial partner in the construction of a community center. As you can see initially, there were various levels of interest from all 10 potential partners. However, after reviewing information about the possible partners, the Committee narrowed the possible partners to four. The narrowed list included: the school district, two developers and Dakota County. After further analyzing these possible partners, the Committee recommended that Dakota County and Newland Communities were the preferred partners based on the site selected. Once the preferred location was identified, the Consultant and staff developed a site plan that showed how a community center and outdoor athletic facilities could fit together on a larger site. The site plan is shown in your packet as Exhibit E. The site plan identifies a community center, storm water pond areas, soccer fields, youth baseball/softball fields, parking lots, trails and street alignments. It is important to note that while the outdoor recreational facilities are shown on the site plan, these facilities were not part of the community center study. The outdoor recreational facilities are only being shown on the site plan for illustrative purposes on how indoor and outdoor recreational facilities could fit together on this preferred site. The outdoor recreational facilities would need to be further developed through a master plan, which would address the following: parking lot space and configuration requirements, concession buildings, restrooms, maintenance equipment storage needs, specific trail locations, picnic shelters, playground equipment, etc. The community center concept plan was developed over the past two months by Committee members. Included in your packet is the concept plan that was discussed at the February 15th City Council and Park and Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) Workshop and is shown as Exhibit F. As you can see by the concept plan there are two phases proposed initially for the community center. The two phases being recommended in the community center concept plan, reflect spaces that were most favored by the community in a survey that was conducted during the Community Center Feasibility Study. The spaces shown also reflect the prioritized spaces that Committee members ranked highest through an interest survey that they completed. The results of the interest survey are shown as Exhibit G. At this time only Phase One is being recommended to be completed as part of the initial construction of a community center. Phase Two would be constructed at a later date. It is important to understand that during the development of the community center concept plan, the committee had to decide between showing a specific identified program space on the concept plan for a later expansion of a community center beyond Phase One and Two or to list possible ideas for expansion opportunities. The Committee chose to list possible ideas for expansion opportunities beyond Phase Two. Jim Maland (the Consultant) from BRAA will be attending the February 21 st City Council meeting and will be making a presentation on the community center site plan and concept plan. The consultant will be available to answer any questions you may have regarding the site plan, concept plan and cost estimates. Robin Roland, Interim City Administrator has worked with the City's bond council to develop property tax impact information and a cost estimate to do a referendum. This information is included in your packet. The PRAC discussed the site plan and concept plan for a community center at its regular meeting on February 15th and made recommendations to the City Council regarding the summary report, site plan, concept plan, partnerships and future direction for a community center. Its recommendations are shown below under action requested. ACTION REQUESTED By motion accept the Community Center Summary Report. By a separate motion approve the recommendation by PRAC to take action on a community center in the following manner: 1. Approve the Newland Communities site as the preferred site for a community center. 2. Approve continuing to explore community center financial partners. 3. Approve the community center concept plan that identifies the spaces and phasing plan for a community center. 4. Postpone a decision on a referendum until after the City Council Goal Setting Retreat on March 10,2006, but no later than April 30, 2006. ~.. tful...1Y S~it~~~.,' /} .~.~ andy Distad Parks and Recreation Director cc: Community Center Study Committee Members Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Members CI) ~ E E o o ~ "C :::::s - en ... oS c CI) o ~ c :::::s E E o o ~ + ~ . r .~ LU tn tn CI) ... "C "C <( ca E w CI) c o .c Q. CI) o CI) c o .c Q. ~ ... o ~ CI) c o .c Q. CI) E o :I: (/) ::J C E N .,- .:.t. C .8 (/) '> Cll "0 U CD l"- V V I ('I') CD V I ..- 10 CD (/) ::J C E N ..- I"- ..- ('I') I 10 V N I 10 V CD 10 0) ..- CD I o CD V I ..- 10 CD Q) c (/) ::J C E c .8 c o !!!. '~ (/) 10 I"- 00 00 I I"- CD 00 I N ..- CD I"- 10 o 00 I o CD V I ..- 10 CD f'-. N CD ('I') I ('I') CD V I ..- 10 CD -v V V=NWV N N~gQ)N 0=01-10$0 10 Cll 10 .... 10 (j)1O~IO::JZ(j)1O ~ZcZ..c:2~Z 00 :2 .9:2 ~ C 00 :2 "0 Cg'C- X.9"O c ".....O=OLUo>....O v.('I')....._ 0> CD C('l')..... tn 0) 0> LU ..... v .- 0 0> e ..- .!: I"- .!: 0) ENe ..-EvEoo....NE "C 10 .... V .... ..- I~ V .... "C..-CllO)Cll .....('I')Cll <(1OU...-U. IOU. c o ;; ca .~ c ca 0) ... o CI) E ca z "0 .... Cll o m o o .c. (.) (j) ..... "0 (/) C 'S: Cll a; Cll >-- o Q) ns 0>$ E .- CI) CllE- .... .- ni 01-- "0 .... Cll o m o o .c. (.) (j) '0 C ::J o o >- ..... o '0 5"0 o ffi o >--!: :!: Cll OCL >- t Cll 0> o U. >- ..... (/) .;:: .c. o c o J!!. ~ Q) > <D 00 V N ...;0 0:2 cz .9:2 (/) ~ C >.9 LUo> N .!: 00 E N .... 0) Cll ..-u. (/) ::J C E N .,- .:.t. C .8 v o o 10 I ('I') CD V I ..- 10 CD I"- o N N I ('I') CD V I ..- 10 CD V N o 10 Q)1O cZ ~:2 c c :0 0 0..... o::g' o E N .... N Cll IOU. c c 0 o 'w ~ ~.~ <D g E n 'S: E <D "0 0 0::<(0 .... ~ .~ g c 5 0:: 'S: o 'w 0>"0 -g :;:; ~.!Q c <( CllmgE:.ci<D"O -!: n 'S: E E c (ij Cll <D "0 0 Cll <D 0 CLo::<(oo::om "0 c Cll c::: 10 o ..- 00 I o CD V I ..- 10 CD V N o .....10 <D1O ~Z 00:2 ~c o 0 TIo, .- c I 'E ..- .... o Cll ('I')u. "0 ~ CJ) o >- "0 C Cll 0:: CJ) C 0> .2> I Cll ::J Cll CL Q) c ..: Q) t:: Cll .r:::. u """ co L.. Q) J:l Q) ;: u 0) o 00 CD I o CD V I ..- 10 CD <DV ::IN cO Q)1O >10 <(Z .c.:2 CJ) =c 0>0 c..... LUo> 10 .!: ..- E I"- .... 0) Cll ..-u. .... >- <D .... .::: g 0:: 'S: 0>"0 c<( :.: ~ ..c<D"O E c (ij Cll <D 0 o::om .... Q) ..c Q) $ .!!:1 "i:: Cll .c. o E o U .:.t. C -.:: o .r:::. u c Cll C/l ::l C E N L.. ~ E .r:::. Cll L.. Cll (/) I"- o 10 ..- I ('I') CD V I ..- 10 CD N CD o 10 I ('I') CD V I ..- 10 CD ('I') 0) 00 ('I') I ('I') CD V I ..- 10 CD V N CD N I o CD V I ..- 10 CD V N o 10 Q:)1O ~Z 00:2 ..... c ::J 0 c..... -0> ~ .!: o E ..- Cll IOU. t5 .;:: 5~ 0,0 c- .- 0 EOt (ijTI.E u.(j)(j) (/) (/) ::J ::J C c E E c .8 "0 Cll ~ "0 L.. ..- ..- 010 0000 ..- ..- I I ('1')('1') CD CD VV I I ..- ..- 10 10 CD CD ..... ..... <D Q) <D <D .... .... enen ~ ~ Cll Cll 00 1010 NN ('I') ('I') ~:t: Cll Cll en en >- >- ..... ..... 00 .... Q) :2 .c. Cll .... Cll (j) "0"0 .... C Cll Cll == Cll W 5 m 0'- m~go::o v, c >- 0> ~ tn ._ "0 5 ~-:~ .g ffi OO...Jo::o:: V.l\lb(f b " , ;~ W ~' " , .. ':: ~:.'. ;' ,,1,<~ /i, i:p:::i".'. . .: i H; c' , \~,;\ '::\\\ ,Y~l;;;~ '"!:\\ II v~~:? YiR,:: \\ lWJ-'l~~ '~ :8 ~~@: 1\\ .., ~ ~~>>~f I . :j' ...... .\\ ~~ c 'f . f'~0c; /m ~~ III..... ..... m, I .) .' I v" 'JIT. ":",,'''!!! -f' ': .' ~= \ ~{\\ ~ .=~.. ~~~. .' , / II , V; 161 ,W) . --.-- .I~ _..~ ~ , I '1'1 i;~_~h ~ - c 1 [ ~I [' ....... . ..- .. : ........... ... ::: .::~mH~~H~. ::~~:::: .: ... ...:::::::.....:00 .; =:::::::::: . ...:::::::: :m::::::::' .. 't :~ig~~j!~ ... .... "! .. ~1[.Ill' .:E: :i T: :miiiii:::W m~ ];IJ'11 .::~!: ~;;~iii~i immil1b~. Ii:=jlJLUL 1---] ::::::: m: :: '.)m . :::i~ITf mr, i::;;~m;l ::"(; tB ~ /~~ _ I'L' ,_ " ~Pr:.:c"'~~_ .._." mm... - Ir H!i .~ ...... _ ... , . 7 .. 1Il!l'll!\l IlIJHiIII~- - I - . .~~ - ~111It~1~11:I " ill!!iFi~I~]f~~~m!mmi ~. +_ '!I~~~~~;~ . .1 :: . i -- I llli1imgw \1' ~'lm7: ,'@T6 - &~ t II City of Farmington N City Boundary , -~~- 1 Community Center ffiiliffil 100-Year FEMA Flood~a;n . ",/ .. _ II] w Site Locations .. 500-Year FEMA Floodplain 1 ...... -~ l . LLI--' ... I 1 I ......- d I / llr=: r~~ i ~ W I~ l:::: lID! Jilt::::"'" 0 ~= -.- :::::mm: ::::::::::::: :::::::::::... :::::::: ::::. ..... Feet ill~!IIIIIIII"ii!!!" : 1!!III!!!!il~i:' .::mgj!mmmf .................. ~mmmm~::.. I. o 1 2500 July 2005 k:\ 141\141 maplcad\gislavprojectslcomm center.apr ..z) -\- ,.; --- ..Y '. ~ .-C. '~ LU ~ ID o::c I- Q) <cU :E ~Z Z<=::2:", o ::J c>? li - E 00 :.: !;;(Ec,~ .~ ~8 <=2....:: ..J E '" " <c<=~o~ >.9111 ,. w g> u.. W'- I- E Cii ro u.. ~ ip .f . " 1;3 i Ii:: " '" ;;; ~ " [Ii ." .. :.: .r:! .c; " 'Ii " 'Ii li :.: .r:! ...; " 'Ii ." .. :.: .r:! ,..; " ." .. :.: .. .~ " :: ~ ~ ~ u: g.:= ! " .;: 2: .;: u c: :3 <.I .- .. '" oeo 000000000000 ~ 000 - N N N.>D~OOOOrJ:i>D~\O\O~O\ ~ = = ~~~ M~~~~~M~~~MM \O~~ NN'<TOOOOoO\O=:~~~O'. ~ = = MM-'<to:t'<:fMNM<r1o:tl""'l ." .. :.: .. .~ :: ",NO -N ooflNOSS\O~NNOO~ ~ = = ..."'''' _ N gg~oooooo\O~goo::::\O ~ = = N"'''' l,f') VI 'o:T o::t '<T '<T ("", M or') N o:t N \O~Vi ~gOOOOOOOO\ol,f')o:t~go-. ~ = = M<nN'Ot'<:t'<tM--o:;tV"l("'j \O~Vi ~gNOOOOO:::~gg~ ~ = = MV)MV)l,f')l,f')-.:t"NMV)V)'<:t ONO --N o:to::tgooOOOO\O~ggNV'l ~ = = --<I"l"f"o::to:tMo:tl,f')"'MV'l No:tV'l "'<to:t'<:tNNNNVi'<:to::to:tM .. E ~ ~ ~ .~ =1 ___ e ~ VJ e ~.- 9- ~IE ~ ~ Cl u 0 c::;e tl3 I..I~~~~_~~E I~.g~~ ~~ 1=I~O~~~~~~U2~~~I~~~ ~oU~~~~S~~~~~~_c ~ .~I g. -;: .: 3 VJ ;;>- VJ '..I u.l!- ~ g ~ g ~:i!? ~~~~~ >U~NOO> ...: 000000000 ggM~l,f')<n~go:t '<t o:t _ V')~, ("j 1"". o:t N gSNO~~~:::OO "<'t N"<1"Ntrl lJi('f"',N '<t <r\l,f')~~lIio~g'<T MMo:tV'lMNM'<:tN :::.......\O::~s~s'<t N_NNViNMNN ~~~g~~~g'<t MlI"l"1"'<:tMVlM-:t"N ~g~~~~~g'<t t""l'<t'<:tV'll,f')l./"lM'<TN g~NOOV)~g'<T '<:tM'<tNNM("','<:tN V'lV'lMV'lV'l<.n'<:t\(')N ~ " c ~ ~ --~ -.~ f ~ 'E - ~ ~ c: 8 v Q:i c: ~ ~* -ga~*> v ~~ ~e.5O-] g 5 -= 25 a ~ ~.9 ;a ;g ~ ~ t";::.o u..2 :g ;a w ~ ~ t:: ro -;;::..: v le.I g -0 C ~ ~ .3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ j ~ ... 0000 C <rl V'l o..n N N N- <:tV"l<rl1""l Vi V'l Vl V'l _ N OV'll.f"1Vl NNN- "TV"l'liM ~~l.fjV') lI') \1"\ l.rl trJ N N N N V'iV'\ViVi N NN N Vl V'\ .,... <rl - N N- ~ ~] < 8 ~ ~ S~<<~ '';-5 ~~ ~ E ~ I.~ ~ ~ uo...:o > 0.. ,.; o ;N ~.o ~,." ~..... ~~ ... ., - ... ~Ln g VI .- ..J" ct l\:j I-Q=: g cu .. ~ " 0> " a. '" $ EO .. EO 3l " EO EO 8 :r; ~ l!! ~ ~ ~ E ~ c o ~ ~ UJ .~ (/) " c .. () ,.. .~ ~ EO o \I i2 ~ ~ ~ u: j ~ o " 00 ~ = ~ .. .;; .;; .~ ~ l!! o Q. EO .. ~ ~ (/) ~ o '" '5l 1;; '6 'J; g> :; .. (/) 11 = '" c .. ~ o 9 ij ~ = "- .. " c .!l ~ is 5] ~ ~.5.s -= ~.s ~ Q) ~ V) ~ .g- O....l:: ""5 .: ...: E 5~E cZ:.8"E ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~." ~ ~ : ~ ~ 8 g ~ ] = " - t:oo..c: ~ ~ ~ .Ec:1~ c .!l :; Q. ~ E)<- h"\ b'd- D Committee Partnership Ratings BOneS~ Community Center Ice. Aquatics.parks Farmington MN P1anmng- Desigl1 , 9/20/2005 revised Partnership Rating Total Average 1 2 3 4 5 Score Score Dakota County 3 3 27 4.5 County Fairgrounds 3 1 2 23 3.8 Northfield Hospital 1 1 3 1 21 3.5 Town & Country Development 1 2 1 1 1 17 2.8 Dakota Technical College 2 1 1 2 15 2.5 Farmington Hockey Association 2 3 1 15 2.5 YMCA 3 1 1 1 14 2.3 Farmington School District 4 1 1 13 2.2 Newland Communities 2 3 1 11 1.8 Lifetime Fitness 4 1 1 9 1.5 *Ratings are from 1 to 5 with 5 being the best. m t< ~, & "":'\ -r Tn 'a ::T II III CD II It I~ II II r- II CD < CD "U I>> :s u . . ~ . . Cl S "T1 ~ in -< Q Ei ~ m g > -< > rn ~ r- C m :D 0 en ;: "T1 m rn "T1 S c ~ ~ ~ z !!! ~ # # / . . / o ~ .. ;: , ~ ..t ~ ^ 0 .+ .."'. ;: c 9 ~ m .... z ~ ~ . r- iil ~ ~ . . / . . / . . .v o o o -I O--l00 C/)C/) O(1)OOO~C -IUlo:i=-=-CDv l> to' - ~ ~ - --l r-=-O""\""\30 . occ-o- "'Co=-$l$l""'~ ::I: 0 Ul -. -, 0 l>=-::;gg<15 (I)~~O(l)3 m2=:oc(1) ()o=-o-=- =~~--lu; g O~ 0...... )>g(1)o:i-o a.-=--Q,l 3 () ~ S' ...... ::3 -, 0 (0 ~ ?f? --0 a 0 0' =- =- g. "Tl "Tl f(o m ;0 o Q,l a. ~ ...... .CIl (J1 ?f? ~ Q" .Ul m f) ~ ~ {,19 (,19 ~~......~......~...... c.n"'w......rv.......... <o'O<orvO>'oO> O)coocnwow Q)(J1......w-..JO-..J ~-.....-.....~"w'O"w O-..JwwtOOtO NONtOwOw "'COc/)-I-o~roC/)~--l)>)>O~Q)>bQ;ooom(l) i~~@~i~~~~~~~(1)~3~()Q,l3gQ3a~ "'" () - " ~ -. - =- -- 0 a. ,;::;- ;7<:' -' (') _-:I ".,. CIl ~ Q,l 7' '< =r 0 -0' 1i) 0- -........ =- a (1) (1) 7' () (1) ~ (") CI)~~ ~~~~Q-<5o=rCll-Q,lUl~-UlQmC/))>m ~ 0 -. - -0 w :::l::O -- CIl ::; -I (') =: =- "Tl c' '0 3 -. -0 -. o=- ~=- g~~ 3=rO vg~5 _ -.. <0 '" -. =- (1)::3 -. Ul CI) -' Q,) m ,.... CD -, ~ ::J - m::O CIl ~CIl (0 (') 0 Ul ~ ::; 0 -. 3 ~ Q) ...... ...... ~~N(J1"""~""""""''''''' ..................NWN ~~"w~'Orv'O'O~<OtOrvrvrv~~~w O)"'cn......~"'<J1<J1cncow-..J-..J-..J-..JCO~CO c.n<J1<J1-..JN~cnwcoOcnNNNCOtONN CIl Ul Ul CIl CIl Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul CIl Ul ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . ...................... ~ <J11l> !"cnu,"-...j:;:O C/)<J1"'Om " cncno)> Ul Ul Ul ~~~ ~????== -f\ --. -.. -..- ~ ........ ~~~~~r-+ ??? ??? -- ~ ~ c: ~ z ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~t~~~ <J1ww-..Jw-...j~-...j-...j<J1~(J1CO(J1~~~'Oco-..Jco"'C CO(J10<J1<J1(J1<J1<J1<J1<J1(J1(J1COOW0<J18<J10<J1~ ("') m ~~ ~Io ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~o cnw-...j............~......~W..................NtOW~~~......NO(l) to......cncocncococo~~COtOW......<J1....<J1cnN<J1<J1-1 tOtOtON<J1~~~cn<J1~-..JtOcnoW(J1(J1......tO~ " rvrv"wrv~rv~u,'O~-""'-""'~~rv"w'O"w~u, (J1-...j......(J1~O-...jOOCO~cnWONCOtOOcnNO 0<J10000<J100ooocno-...joooooo "'C ~ Q,l Ul CI) ..... (") o CJ) -l m CJ) :::! :s: ~ m -IO-lOocncn OCOOOO;:::;:C -IUlQj::l=:l<Dr;;; )> l.Cj" - ~ ~ - -I r-=:l0..,..,30 - OC:C-O- "'tIO::l~U-'~ :r: 0 Ul -. -. 0 ..... =:l - 0 0 < """UlC::l=:l<D cn~oO(J)3 mc=-oc<D NOO:JO"=:l :::!::J~~ur g O~ 0- )>~~~"U 0._..... (\J 3 0 ~ -. ::l :2. 0 (.CI ~ if!. ~ QJ 0 o' =:l =:l ~ " ::u " 0 Qo III 0. m ~ III ...... Y' CJ1 :::l: C 0 roO Y' m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -Yl _w -Yl !'J ~ _'" 0)""'......"'0)1\:)0) UJ-...j-...jCXlO)CJ1W ~O>CXlCXl<.DOCO -:..... --...j '0 -co -...... '0 "...... "-10"'............0...... O1WI'J~--a.O-..lo. "'0 ~ QJ Ul (1) N "'OOQrcns:o-<cnz CJ)m ~ ::;. c ~ .....0 c ::r 0 co CD h (") ,,~ "'0 lllC"l-'-'-.;::;:::;C-o< co W Sill)> lJl co...,.., 0> -. 0. = 0> < ...., ...., ~ C') CD - 0 u co -0 .... ..... -. lJl 0 Q. 10' n III 0 0 C co Q.) 0- -. _ CD m N ~ ~ 0 CD ~ ~ :!1 ~"'C -, 0 ~ (I) o - -0 ~COEll\) C') d:J;:j? ~~romg<n 0 ..... 0 CO'<<nUl~lJl ::: Ell ^ CD -< iii g ~ ~ Q. ~ o 3 "tJ ::r- III III (1) ..... ...... 01 "1\:)""'" w............ OO>(J1-...j""'"W-......"-...jW -...j<.DCXl-...jI\:)CJ1N""'0) W"''''''''''''''NCXl'''''CO lJl (Jl (Jl Ul (Jl (Jl (Jl Ul (Jl .p.p.p.p.p.p.p.p.p ..... N N I~ ..... 0 ..... ..... ~ 0> (J1 ..... 0) <n en en ~~~ ~ ~~ ;:t~?;=~??;::::? -Yl~~~~-Yl~~ ~wl\J~-Jo.~"")"~ gjo~~~~i:Sffi ~ ~ :~ -Yl -Yl -Yl ......~O-YlO>I\:)W~ ......-...jI\:)(J1OowO) ......-...jO>COO......""'O) wo,'"","-...jO'(o-CXlN O>N......COO......""'C1> OOOO)CONCOCJ1 ~ ...... C1>ln .00 8m 0-1 ,~ -+ Q '-s: \~ 1-\- .\ ~ seh 8"'l mil en >. Q) ~ ::J C/) "0 Q) Q) a. E o u a ~ III E E ::J C/) <Il Ql .;c <Il <Il l/l Ql 8 (/)!~ Ql l/l .;c '0 .;c Ql C en i._ .5 Ol <Il Cl>!..o 0 't: C Cl CIE,c.. :l u:: E 0 Cf!u'~ f- ,~ :-E 'w ~ :0 :S!U ~ 0 :~ 0:: >. <Il 0 .0 .0 Q; 0 <Il ~i& ~ '0 :l ~ cc :.:J <I:: .5 !<I:: i Ql 'jij otiig':r: .~ mio ~ U) ~ JU5 u i ! I I I ! I ! ll)1ll) I I 100 i i o 8 'E E <Il <Il :l EO c%~w ~ >.Ql.J:: [g Ol :2 u .~ ~~.3~~ CD (Y) ill) 00 I I <:: 0 0 0 0 ll) ll) '(Y) CiLt) ll) 0 ll) 0 010 ll) '" 0 ll) 0 0 .... '" (Y) It)i('l .... ll) .... 0 0:0 '" Ql Iti .,; ,.; .,; .,; ,.; N .,;;,.; ,.; .,; ,.; Iti ltii"; ,.; ::E 8 Ql U C C l.Oi <Il ~ 1.0 v.M 1.0 1.0 N 'v "" jM N ,1.0 'M t 0 0 c. c. .s S i ~ .J:: 1.0 iM :'U") 1.0 Ol i i .Q E ~ ~ 1 Ql Ql i > > :1.0 Iv 1.0 1M II II 1.0 ! :M il.O jv v ! > w > c::: ~ UJ I- UJ W ... c:::,s w ; 1-0 z~ - c W ~ (.) E 0:: ~ CO LL c:g .so ~ g'~ UJ .- M c:( E~ I-tt. Ol C ~ C <Il 0:: E :l '00 ~ 0 E 0 >.,'0 ClE 8 C <Il Cl :;:'0 ti~:g co Q,) l... ~ ~,~ ! E! 8! 0::1 l/l QlI l/l l/l, Ql Ot c ~ii: gjs - :l ~!~ roi l/l ~ 8' r & ~. ~ ~ E C 0.. E u), ~ U ~,: .~ ~ ~i co ~ o o:~:.o::E: 0 g c g; cc .3 oj U5 0:: Q):l ., U)U) o ~ ~ ~ .sl III ~ .. II) '0 w ell 2 Gl '" c:: II: .: >< ~~ r::." .!!! si O.c: .= (.) E IJl :;; ~ u. <= O~ :c <32l CI)~ 0::" UJ~ ..J~ o :J:~ UJ: ~ E. :2Cf)~ Ul~'" Q>.~ ~ ~~f5 32-0;> ~.~m ~.~ ~ Ulu..co It) o o '" II) ~ '" IJl <ii ." c: o III E '" E '" > o is. .5 '" g III !2! :c o T! '" c: '" c:l ~ 'c;; Q; c '" n; IJl 00 00 00 ~~ "'''' ~~ <J) '0 '" o III '0 <J) c l'l 5 ::; Eal ":jjj '" 0 0.1-- ~iUg5~g> ~=F~~~ ~~~~ Vi t':' (l).~-g~~ ~88~~ ~:5 0 ~.o ~g g~g o <<:l~ o. g~~ '" . . co ~ ~ ~ ~ .", ~ '" @)i1l _ <J) "';;: :J 0 8- .~ :s ou '0 " :J u.. '" o t5 2 Vi '" o Vi U ~t)'E '" ":J ~ "e- ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ "5. & 5 19 J t3&~ '" II) III ~ <> .!: )( '" I-- n; :J '" c: <C ." '" 1ii .5 1ii w " :J n; > Q; -l! III :;: ni'E .E-e2 .~ i;' a 0.0. o o o o o It) ... ~ ffi g ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ o o o o o ... ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ro N ~ ro ~ N ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ m ~ m ~ ~ f6 ~ gj ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ a) o o o o o '" ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ 0 ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ro ~ N ro M m ro 0 ro ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ M ro a) ~ a) m ~ ~ N m <<:l <<:l ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ M N 0 0 m m m <<:l o o o o' It) '" ... f6 ~ ~ ffi ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ro ro ro 0 ~ N ~ 0 M N 0 0 0 ~ w ro W N M ro ~ ~ N m ~ ~ ~ ~ v v M M M Nom <<:l <<:l <<:l <<:l ~ ~ o o o on ~ ... ~ m ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ o o "!. ... ~ N <<:l ~ M ro a N ~ m M ~ N ~ v ~ ro ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " > 1ii :;: II: II: ~ I-- 0) eft. ?f!. ?fl. ~ ~ ~ ?fl. ?fl. ?f!. ?f!. ?f!. ?fl. ?fl. eft ~ ~ ';:/i!. ~ ~ ~ #. 8 N ro ~ M ~ 0 N ~ ~ M ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ o '" .E " '" ffi > <( " II) > III :E ~ .!: ~ ~ #. #. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '#- ~ #. ~ '#- '#- #. '#- #. '#- #. '#- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 > :;: II: ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m~~m~~ci~~~ci~m~m~mmmmm ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ omm~~rim~~o ci~ ~~o~~~~~ ro 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ m ~ N ~ M m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ro ro ro ~~~~~~~~~~ri~~~~~~~~~~~ ... 0:> 0:> <D ~. N. )( !:' III " .... ..J '" o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g L6o~~a)~.05~. ~ ~.N.~.~~~_~~;1). ~ ~ ~ ~ti ~. ~. 1/). <<; ~~ ~ ri~ci 5S. ~. ~_ '" 0:> 0 <D 0:> 0 '" '" om~ <D .... '" I/)~ ~ M~ 0:> '" ... 0:> ... '" ~ N- '" 0:> ~. ~. a U; .... .... ~05 ~. to. (ij ~ '00 I-- ori + ~ 0 '" ... ~ci N '" .... "'. ro M <0 <0 m u; ~ ~ ~<6ai<6 o '" 0:> N_ ~ ~ M. '" 0:> 0 co 0:> 0 '" '" ciai<6 <D .... '" I/)~ "I;f". M. ~ ~ 0 '" '" .... cr:i-.:i-ri ~. ~ co. ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ u; ~ ~ ~ cr:i<6N~"":-.:i"';ri~ci to. ~. ffi. ~. ~. ~~ g~ ~~ ~~ n; '0 O/l .... 0. ~~~m~~~~ oai~.ocr:i ffi~~~~~~~.~. o 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 8 N~o~6c\iM.~c~ia56 ~it :g~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~. ~~ ~. ~. ~. o 0 0 0 ~ 0; ;;; ~ 6~ro~M~ ~ M m ~ ~. ~. ~~ <O~ 'C1ii c: .. o ffi m :E ro 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ro ro ~ ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ g ~ciai"":cia5ci"":a5riNci"":ciNri"":<6a50 m ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ;1) ~ ~ M ~ ~ I/) ro ." : c: '" ~~ ~ ~ ?fi. ?fi. ~ ?fi. ~ ~ ~ ~ ?fi. ~ ~ ~ ?fi. ~ #. ~ ~ ~ g 8 g g g g 8 8 8 8 g 8 8 8 g g g 8 8 8 Ii) <0 ~ ro maN M "I;f" Ii) <0 ~ ro m 0 N M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m w w w n; '0 Q. C 'u ~ ,5 C: o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci6ciciciciocicici66cicicicicicicici Ii) Ii) Ii) Ii) I/) Ii) Ii) Ii) Ii) Ii) Ii) Ii) 0 0 0 0 <0 Ii) I/) Ii) NNNM"I;f"U")~~rommmo~o.o. N.~~ 8 g ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ N ~ N N N N N N N ~ ~ N N ~ N N N ~ N N N u ~ ~ '" '0 " (.)~ g 8 ~ 0 ~ ~ : ~ 5 ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N >- ~ > '" '" '" ..J ~ g g g ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .. u ~ .. t/) ~ ~ ~ u: ~ ~ ro o QI; '" on '" <D o '" ::; c. ;;; ;..:. <b 8 ~ QI; '" on '" <D o '" 0:> '" ...: .... oi '" 0:> '" ...: <D '" N :>, <> '" " 0> '" "~ 8 O/l II) C " .... E 0 0.0 "3 N gJ2 II) " " <J) ~ ~ \;:;: .s oj .aN "E ~ .a~ ...: co ila e ~ ~ "E ~"S; 8m~ aia:8 ~ ~~ Co. ~"'O o ~ '" tsJ2~ 2"'00 ti * ~ 8,E~ :fi :fi & '0 II) '" =' oS CD U ro > .s a:: <( ~ ~ E c. o o o ~ '" <D ~ ~ .~ ~ "" \'! " :E w >- .c JOe, City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, City Council Members kf 1~r\--'/ Acting City Administrator \J FROM: Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - 21054 Chippendale Court Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION Patrick Regan, POR-MKR Real Estate, has submitted an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan from Non-designated to Industrial and rezone the property located at 21054 Chippendale Court (formally the Marschall Bus Garage) from A-I (Agriculture) to I-I (Light Industrial). The property is located south of the American Legion and Hometown Subdivision and north of Dakota Storage (Exhibit A). This property was platted as part of the Empire Liberty Addition in February of2003, at a time when the property was in Empire Township. A Joint Resolution regarding the annexation of the property in question was approved by the Empire Town Board on May 10, 2005 and by the Farmington City Council on May 16, 2005. The Joint Resolution was then sent to the Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit of the Office of Administrative Hearings (MBAU), where the annexation of the property was approved on June 9, 2005. Upon the approval of the annexation by the MBAU, the property was automatically zoned A-I (Agriculture) per Section 10-4-3 of the City Code. DISCUSSION Surrounding Development A majority of the surrounding properties are zoned B-1 (Highway Business), including the American Legion to the north, the car wash, Dairy Queen and Dakota Lumber to the west, and the vacant parcel of land to the south (on the northeast comer of Trunk Highway 3 and 213th Street). In addition, the only residential property on Chippendale Court that is currently in the City is also zoned B-1. Dakota StoragelMarigold is the only property in the vicinity located on the east side of Highway 3 that is currently zoned 1-1. Intended Usee s) The applicant has indicated that he has entered into a ten year lease agreement with Mobile Mini Storage. Mobile Mini would supply mobile storage units, mobile offices, and trailers from this location to the Twin Cities metro area. In addition, they would also perform repair and maintenance on the aforementioned items from this location. It is proposed that Mobile Mini will occupy two of the three buildings on site. Planning Commission Meeting At the Planning Commission meeting of February 14, 2006, staff recommended to the Commission members that they deny the request for an Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation and deny the requested rezoning from A-I (Agricultural) to I-I (Light Industrial). Staff recommended approval of a Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial and approval of a rezoning to B-1 (Highway Business) for the property located at 21054 Chippendale Court. This recommendation was given by staff due to the residential development that is anticipated to the north and east of this property, and taking into account the property's proximity to Trunk Highway 3 and the number of current and future commercial properties in the vicinity. Staff believes that a Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation and B-1 zoning classification would be more appropriate for this property on a long term basis than a higher-intensity industrial classification. It is important to note that a B-1 zoning classification would in no way prohibit the applicant from pursuing Mobile Mini Storage as a tenant for this property. Staff has determined that this particular use would be classified as a "storage yard", which would be allowed as a Conditional Use in the B-1 zoning district. The Planning Commission heard testimony on the proposed zoning change at the February 14, 2006 meeting and (a) recommended denial the requests for a Comprehensive Plan designation of Industrial and Rezone to I-I (Light Industrial) for the property located at 21054 Chippendale Court and (b) recommended approval of a Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial and approval of the rezone ofthe property from A-I (Agriculture) to B-1 (Highway Business). ACTION REQUESTED Approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Non-designated to Commercial and rezone the property from A-I to B-1. Respectfully submitted, Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner Cc: Patrick Regan o <[ I" I- 1---1 ~ 1---1 I X W o . ,111~1l..~dS< ~~~~~ ?iij I TT ~ \ijJ'<Y El(gB~;- ~ \@c:: m ~i'~ ~ 11 ~.{"l- ~l[[!] 1=1- 1 'NJ~ ~= ~ EJ l' ~ , E3 - JL I I~ ~( [IT] "I- 1= ~ - ~~ it;:J WHIT - !!- ~ 1E=1~ /, - N EiJlffiiTrn ~ ILl "] II I ( l - II-r II /I I 'l; -r ~ L t Hi I I~I_ 1- III 1 -.~ L-.J1 _II- I - L- ~' - I-=::::: I---:: - I I I~ -I-- L-....!J I II-- - - --' '--- 1-1 _I~ C Tlr- ~ _~:I-:~t:= -- ~(I) Q. - I-----j ~ I-- t=::j L J~ c:: T ~ r-- . _ II ........ L...-- ~ -~ 1 Fr- .1 I -, 1 I 11-----1 n --- '-- l~~ ~c::: ~ \: ,1>- ~ ~" -~~~ ~g:~ - - ~~~ ~~, ~~l' ~~~~ ~ ~ I I ~t." tr)~" ~ l- ~l '\ -~ 1- ,\ I L I I .:!:..S H1N3^3S I-- ~l 1 ~ _~ 1 - - ~ =11- I I~ I feR:; I - -I L- :::! L- - --' I--I~ I 1,--- L II II II II II II II II II II I -qZ: RESOLUTION NO. AMENDING THE 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 21054 CHIPPENDALE COURT Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 st day of February, 2006 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: introduced and Member _ seconded the following: Member WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a Comprehensive Land Use amendment for the property, formally known as the Marschall Bus Garage property, located at 21054 Chippendale Court and that said request proposes that the land use designation be changed from Non- Designated to Industrial; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 14th day of February, 2006 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and proper notice sent to surrounding property owners; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission accepted public comments at the public hearing and recommended denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property, located at 21054 Chippendale Court from Non-designated to Industrial; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment from Non-designated to Commercial for the property located at 21054 Chippendale Court. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Farmington hereby amends the 2020 Comprehensive Plan for the property located at 21054 Chippendale Court to change the land use designation from Non-Designated to Commercial. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21st day of February, 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of February, 2006. Acting City Administrator CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance Amending Title 10 of the Farmington City Code, the Farmington Zoning Ordinance, rezoning the property located at 21054 Chippendale Court THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 10-5-1 of the Farmington City Code is amended by rezoning the property legally described as Lot One (1), Block One (1), Empire Liberty Addition from A-I (Agriculture) to B-1 (Highway Business). SECTION 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Farmington, adopted under Section 10-5- 1 of the Farmington City Code, shall be republished to show the aforesaid zoning. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage. Adopted this _ day of ,2006, by the City Council of the City of Farmington. SEAL CITY OF FARMINGTON MAYOR ATTEST: ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR Approved as to form the _ day of ,2006. CITY ATTORNEY Published in the Fannington Independent the _ day of ,2006. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: , PI . C . .\j,oV anmng omnnSSlOn I \ / \......, FROM: Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner SUBJECT: Application to Amend Comprehensive Plan from Non-designated to Industrial and Rezone property from A~l (Agriculture) to I-I (Light Industrial) - 21054 Chippendale Court DATE: February 14,2006 INTRODUCTION Patrick Regan, POR-MKR Real Estate, has submitted an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan from Undesignated to Industrial and rezone the property located at 21054 Chippendale Court from A-I (Agriculture) to I-I (Light Industrial). The property is located south of the American Legion and Hometown Subdivision and north of Dakota Storage (Exhibit A). DISCUSSION History of the Property - 21054 Chippendale Court This property was platted as part of the Empire Liberty Addition in February 2003, at a time when the property was in Empire Township. The property is legally described as Lot 1, Block One (1), Empire Liberty Addition. A Joint Resolution approving the annexation of this property was approved by the State's Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit on June 9, 2005. Section 10-4-3 of the City Code stipulates that any property that is annexed into the City is initially classified with an A-I (Agriculture) zoning designation. The property was utilized as the base of operations for the Marschall Bus Line Company, until the company relocated to the Farmington Industrial Park this past summer. The property is not on the MUSA Phasing Plan that was adopted by the City Council in late 2004. The MUSA Review Committee will have to be reconvened and a recommendation to the City Council will have to be made as to the appropriateness of allocating MUSA to this property. The next meeting of the MUSA Review Committee is scheduled for February 16,2006. Surrounding Development A majority ofthe surrounding properties are zoned B-1 (Highway Business), including the American Legion to the north, the car wash, Dairy Queen and Dakota Lumber to the west, and the vacant parcel of land to the south (on the northeast comer of Trunk Highway 3 and 213th Street). In addition, the only residential property on Chippendale Court that is currently in the City is also zoned B-1. Dakota Storage/Marigold is the only property located on the east side of Highway 3 that is currently zoned I-I. Intended Use(s) The property owner, Patrick Regan, has indicated that he has entered into a ten year lease agreement with Mobile Mini Storage. Mobile Mini would supply mobile storage units, mobile offices, and trailers from this location to the Twin Cities metro area. In addition, they would also perform repair and maintenance on the aforementioned items from this location. It is proposed that Mobile Mini will occupy two of the three buildings on site. Staff Recommendation Due to the residential development that is anticipated to the north and east (Hometown and Sunrise Ponds, respectively) of this property, and taking into account the property's proximity to Trunk Highway 3 and the number of current and future commercial properties in the vicinity, the staff consensus is that a Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation and a B-1 (Highway Business) zoning classification would be more appropriate for the subject property. It is important to note that a B-1 zoning classification would in no way prohibit the applicant from pursuing Mobile Mini Storage as a tenant for this property. Staff has determined that this particular use would be classified as a "storage yard", which would be allowed as a Conditional Use in a B-1 zoning district. Staff has addressed this preferred zoning with Mr. Regan by phone and through correspondence (see attached letter dated February 7, 2006). A copy ofMr. Regan's response dated February 10, 2006 has been attached. Staff has identified the 210th Street Extension from Cambodia Avenue to Trunk Highway 3 as crucial for any future development on the east side of TH 3, between County Road 66 on the north and Highway 50 on the south. The initial extension of 210th Street will be from Cambodia Avenue westerly to the Prairie Waterway, which is located just to the east of the subject property. This initial extension is proposed to be constructed with the development of the adjacent Perkins property. The last remaining section of land needed to make the connection between TH 3 and Cambodia Avenue is the former railroad right-of-way that is now part of the Regan property. The City Council has indicated its belief that the roadway connection in question is needed. City staff members have discussed this need with Mr. Regan, and will continue to work with him and the City Council to achieve this objective. ACTION REQUESTED 1. Deny the requests for a Comprehensive Plan designation of Industrial and Rezone to I-I (Light Industrial) for the property located at 21054 Chippendale Court. 2. Recommend a Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial and Rezone the property from A-I (Agriculture) to B-1 (Highway Business). Respectfully submitted, .~ - 7~G0.~ Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner Cc: Patrick Regan ~-. U I rm\ 1 _ ,---"",,- 1 r i2H~S I illll II ~ -'C SIEWERT NnlllllB ~h . h;~LlII"III, ~ a ~~~ ~ i 1# I i=1vl--;j '/~ _;J~ = c- h "" _ V f rg II ( :;;j';:1 ) ~ 7; _-1 J',~ ~ M!' I~" ?10TH "II-i....... e'lOstln I, M I1II IH -f- ~ 'o~," Ii j"1 Tmn m ~ PERKI~ ~ WD~ I~ l DEVNEY tLj) !!!!!~ .l213~HYRm tJ-1 ~ rnrn rnm mID ITITIIJ []][] Iy I r;;~: Uii tD ~ 8IJJ 0llIJ 0E ITJ]]J~ 8ITEl STIE ~;, ~ m::TI om rnm ElJE rnro I3:rr8 bJ::D::j ;f. WINKLER ~ II I@ ~ ttlI@ ~ ~ ~ MM ~ t:l R~-~ ;~,: SPRUCE STREET ~'IIB~~:':I~1Jj lH HH H:"'"' ~~ ";; '0 '" "'IOIJElrIB~~ ~ITIIill ~~g ~~~': ~ ~~ E ~~~~g;x ~~~rnj~ ffi ';""D ~ I'HjII ~il ~,~~ UL f-ql:J if D-'i~( CD '-1 ~ b EB:1ffff!ID "- " u= 8ffiHIfHf[ I: k IJ I I I Ir DEVNEY I- KRAL n n L I 1-- J-- OLSON III - ......r;Tu u~ I--- -------- ISO 192 rt ; I ..___- iJ-l~ I I I I l-J ~p !:!;! ~~ u V'l iii I I I I I I I I t T.H 50 rr e- ~~ e- rTI l . 1--/ ~- Ht=:LJ ~\:== rl l - r-- '-- ---- J 'i::.< --- JC I A~ Crea*d on November 4, 2005!.-- ........ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us February 7, 2006 Patrick o. Regan POR-MKR Real Estate, LLC Hastings, MN 55033 RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning Dear Mr. Regan: Thank you for your applications for a Comprehensive Plan amendment and for the rezoning of the former Marschall Bus Line garage property located at 21054 Chippendale Court. In your applications you expressed a desire for an Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation and an 1-1 (Light Industrial) zoning classification. Accordingly, this is what was reflected in the public hearing notices that were both published in the local paper and sent to the various property owners located within 350 feet of your property. Since your submittal, City staff members have had additional internal discussions regarding the highest and best use of not only your property, but also the neighboring residential properties. There is a clear staff consensus that the small pocket of residential properties located directly between your property and Trunk Highway 3 will ultimately be more suited for commercial uses than for residential or industrial uses. The high visibility of the site, which is a plus for commercial operations, is a detriment for residential uses and is unnecessary for most industrial uses. The same can be said for the relatively high (and ever-escalating) traffic volumes on Highway 3. If or when the owners of the Chippendale Court residential properties petition for annexation, City staff members will probably recommend that the City Council adopt a Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation and a B-1 (Highway Business) zoning classification for the properties in question. Most of the nearby City parcels are already zoned B-1, including those located to the north (the American Legion), the west (the car wash, Dairy Queen and lumber yard), and the south (the vacant Giles property located to the west of the Glenview Townhomes). The only Chippendale Court residential property that is currently in the City is also currently zoned B-1. The only property located east of Highway 3 that is currently zoned 1-1 is the Dakota Storage/Marigold property. The issue that your application has presented is whether it is more sensible and appropriate to (1) expand the industrial uses in that vicinity by also giving your property an industrial classification or (2) give your property a non-industrial zoning classification that is more consistent with the current and anticipated uses of the majority of the other nearby properties. In light of the residential construction that is anticipated to take place in the near future to the immediate north and east of your property, and your property's proximity to Highway 3 and a number of current and future B-1 properties, the staff consensus is that a Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation and a B-1 (Highway Business) zoning classification would be the most appropriate for your property. A B-1 zoning classification would not prohibit you from using your property for the Mobile Mini Storage business that has been proposed. The staff position is, and will be, that the Mobile Mini Storage business fits within a "supply yard" classification or definition. A supply yard is allowable in a B-1 zoning district as a conditional use. City staff members are prepared to recommend that the Planning Commission approve a conditional use permit for the Mobile Mini Storage business, subject to whatever conditions the Planning Commission members consider relevant. We anticipate that they will be primarily interested in topics such as parking/loading and related traffic circulation issues, screening, and landscaping - which will have to be addressed regardless of the zoning classification that is ultimately assigned to the property, and which I mentioned in my prior letter to you dated November 17, 2005 (copy attached). If you agree that the recommended Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation and the B-1 zoning classification are appropriate and/or acceptable, you can indicate that fact by mailing, faxing (651-463-1611) or e-mailing a short letter to that effect, which we will consider an amendment to your original applications. We would need to receive your letter or e-mail by 10:00 a.m. on Friday, February 9,2006 in order to include it in the Planning Commission packet for the meeting on February 14. If we receive such a letter, your amended application will be presented to the Planning Commission with a staff recommendation for approval. If you still wish to pursue an Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation and 1-1 zoning, you certainly have the right to do so, but we wanted to let you know in advance that the staff recommendation to the Planning Commission will be to adopt a Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation and a B-1 zoning classification. If the Commission does so, you can immediately apply for a conditional use permit (CUP), and we'll schedule a public hearing on the CUP for the next Planning Commission meeting on March 14, 2006. As noted above, City staff will recommend approval of the CUP. If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (651) 463- 1822. Sincerely, Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner POR-MKR Real Estate, LLC 1321 Southview Drive Hastings, MN 55033 February 10, 2006 Mr. Tony Wippler Assistant City Planner City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Dear Mr. Wippler: This letter is in response to your letter of February 7, 2006, where you indicate Farmington City Staff is prepared to recommend approval of our rezoning application for 21054 Chippendale Court to Commercial B-1 instead of Industrial 1-1 , as was requested in my Application dated January 13, 2006. My application was predicated on the historic and anticipated future use of this property. It was also based upon my understanding, after many meetings and discussions with City staff. Furthermore, it was based upon the earlier official proceedings at the Planning Commission and City Council related to my request for, and approval of, annexation of this property into Farmington. While I am disappointed in the time delay apparently caused by your most recent recommendation, I am generally agreeable to your suggestion with the following specific stipulations: 1. Any Conditional Use Permit conditions be based only on the currently applicable conditions for property use in 1-1 Zoning Districts. 2. City of Farmington immediately take whatever actions are necessary to grant MUSA designation to the property. 3. Any Conditional Use Permit is to remain in effect until Property Owner should choose to request a change in the use from its historic and anticipated use as Industrial in nature. 4. These Zoning, Comprehensive Plan Designation, and Conditional Use Proceedings in no way are to be related to or conditioned upon the City's apparent desire to affect a Taking of a portion of this property for use as a Public Roadway. We continue to be excited about the new businesses we have attracted to this site and to our other properties in Farmington. We look forward to the swift approval of these Zoning and Comprehensive Plan proceedings, and to the further development of this property. Sincerely yours, $3'J{) ,'U City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us PETITION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Applicant: Patrick Regan Telephone: ~ 759-2786 Fax: (651) 437-9197 Address: 1171 SOllthview Drive Street H;l<;tine" City MN State '1'1011 Zip Code Owner: POR-MKR Real Estate. LLC Telephone: (QW 4379421 Fax: (651) 437-9197 Mailing Address: 1321 S011thview Drive Street Hastings City MN State 55033 Zip Code Premises Involved: 21054 Chippendale Court - Empire Liberty Addition Lot 1 Block 1 Address! Legal Description (lot, block, plat name, section, township, range) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~roposed Comprehensive Plan Designation: Agriculture Industrial I understand that a public hearing is required as well as a published notice of hearing, for which I hereby attach payment of the fee in the amount of$ 350.00 , which I understand further will be refun......d.ed ifno m2e~ .s scheduled. ~ j1.~~ /~O -~ Signature of Owner ~7 /~ 2-tI7.t Date For office use only Request Submitted to Planning staff on Public Hearing Set for: Advertised in Local Newspaper: Planning Commission Action: _Approved City Council Action (if necessary): _Approved _Denied _Denied Comments: Conditions Set: Planning division: Date: 11/0S In accordance with Title 10, Chapter 3, Section 12 of the City Code. ~. 30l7, ,,-0 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farminlrton.mn.us II PETITION FOR REZONING APPLICATION II Address: 1321 Southview Drive Hastings Street City MN Fax: ~ 437-9197 55033 Applicant: Patrick Regan Telephone: ~ 759-2786 State Zip Code Owner: POR-MKR Real Estate, LLC Telephone: (651) 437 9421 Fax: @!) 437-9197 Mailing Address: ] 321 Southview Drive Hastings MN 55033 Street City State Zip Code Premises Involved:21 054 Chippendale Court - Empire Liberty Addition Lot 1 Block I Address! Legal Description Oot, block, plat name, section, township, range) Current Zoning A - 1 A gri rnltnre: Proposed Zoning 1-1 Industrial I understand that a public hearing is required as well as a published notice of hearing, for which I hereby attach payment of the fee in the amount of $ '00 00 . which I undersbmd further will be refun~ if no meetin~heduled. ~~ Si~e of Owner t// (fr~ 0../'1 /2;; ?t? 7J 6' Date I .~,>.:...,;, "., ". '.' .::....::.:>:;;.\.;\;..i.;:::., ". . .' R~qu~~t' ~~~~ti~(h~ Pianning s~ff<>~ '._';-~:::":~-'. i, .' .:. Public Heanng Set for: . '.<;;-:~:,::;:::,!t'r ForOf~~~ '~sf:~.~r;~_ .:,:,.;-. ",. . .-.:'-".<" '. AdvertiSed inLocal Newspape~: .' : Demed _Denied .. "; ,".:: ~. PlanningComrDi~sion Action::; Approved City CoUncil Action (if necessary): ~:\pproved Comments: Conditions Set: Planning division: Date: 1/05. In accordance with Title 10, Chapter 3, Section 12 of the City Code. "-\ ". " -~"-~..~..:i:-~~~:~:35~~f$/~.' ~. ~...l'l...ll~....,~,.....l ----~"({~. ~~~)1': -z, , Jl~f " ~,. · I : 'I \ ".1 I ~' ~" ,i ~' +\ al~. 1:111 ----- . i?<'l. / ~ ,-------- ..... '.:'>'-',,:',~~,;_:(I-<; ',.,:,'-',. ~': "':..:'~ "-,,.~ru>1:,7,.' i,';:; ,f.,:. /'{;: :."':- / . . . CITY OF FARMINGTON SUMMARY OF REVENUES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005 100.00 % Year Complete (subject to audit) GENERAL FUND Property Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines Intergovernment Revenue Charges for Service Investment income Miscellaneous Transfers Total General Fund SPECIAL REVENUE HRA Operating Fund Police Forfeitures Fund Park Improvement Fund Rambling River Center Swimming Pool Ice Arena ENTERPRISE FUNDS Ice Arena Liquor Operations Sewer Solid Waste Storm Water Water Total Revenues /od .... ><)U~Q()5 )>>>> PERCENT ....~pp~ ......F:rl?Rql,:'r'rfr ) BlJDGI$TU ... .'ltCfH)"2(),O~r< ....Ytb../?2004/ $ $ % 4,750,293 4,733,516 791,175 706,734 79,000 75,000 356,896 363,819 452,500 466,617 225,000 185,193 12,000 26,462 236,000 236,000 6,902,864 6,793,341 220,000 136,779 8,200 8,936 346,000 760,168 148,444 141,037 140,056 147,217 252,500 280,285 3,715,746 1,500,000 1,748,077 295,000 1,670,000 3,455,246 1,199,743 1,616,081 402,065 2,001,988 16,946,887 16,942,886 $ 99.65 3,536,994 89.33 750,549 94.94 89,480 101.94 407,551 103.12 417,357 82.31 353,504 220.52 65,617 100.00 310,000 98.41 5,931,052 62.17 314,460 108.98 10,736 219.70 231,728 95.01 130,513 105.11 133,667 111.00 288,715 92.99 2,990,394 79.98 1,373,981 92.45 1,464,317 136.29 249,412 119.88 1,467,002 99.98 14,585,977 % 99.79 78.37 113.27 126.96 86.02 110.47 184.84 100.00 97.99 99.77 133.37 152.75 98.87 90.25 101.36 96.24 100.80 94.42 96.08 92.42 97.49 CITY OF FARMINGTON SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005 % Year Complete .........................2005.................... p~~~]~m I~ . ~~~1~mpi ~~~~~;~~~~:::<~~<:~:> . . .:~ ~~~:::::::::::::;.;. .................... . $lIPGET ..\YTO)> $ $ % $ % Administration 594,752 643,064 108.12 571,665 99.26 HR/IT 290,023 285,174 98.33 236,148 99.39 Finance 411,888 410,125 99.57 401,209 102.58 Community Development 673,043 671,605 99.79 657,141 107.08 Police 2,369,910 2,534,936 106.96 2,134,640 110.14 Fire 478,959 479,566 100.13 457,575 106.00 Public Works 984,070 956,106 97.16 935,570 104.70 Parks & Recreation 883,544 882,841 99.92 898,932 112.62 Transfers Out 200,000 198,000 99.00 173,000 100.00 Total General Fund 6,886,189 7,061,417 102.54 6,465,880 106.82 SPECIAL REVENUE HRA Operating 42,200 46,413 109.98 278,601 96.34 Police Forfeitures Fund 8,200 14,572 177.71 10,396 92.38 Park Improvement Fund 399,282 461,476 115.58 295,729 134.66 Senior Center 148,444 139,416 93.92 146,757 115.88 Swimming Pool 132,533 102,772 77.54 128,241 95.57 Ice Arena 245,759 288,038 117.20 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Ice Arena 295,758 112.66 Liquor Operations 3,572,631 3,456,193 96.74 2,905,123 93.98 Sewer 1,544,297 1,210,147 78.36 1,316,108 93.75 Solid Waste 1,753,790 1,585,850 90.42 1,594,582 105.43 Storm Water 400,884 335,040 83.58 298,001 78.72 Water Utility 1,061,388 800,610 75.43 1,442,224 58.61 Total Expenditures 16,195,597 15,501,944 95.72 15,177,400 95.20 I/cv City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: \~v Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City Administrator 'V FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications - 19Sth Street Extension to Trunk Highway 3 Proj ect DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION The City Council accepted the feasibility report for the 19Sth Street Extension to Trunk Highway 3 Project at the January 17, 2006 City Council meeting. DISCUSSION At their January 31, 2006 meeting, the Dakota County Board authorized the execution of an agreement between the County and the City for the 19Sth Street Extension to TH 3 Project (see attached). Also attached is a letter from Newland Communities indicating their commitment to fund their proportionate share of the design costs for the roadway project. At this time, with the commitments from Dakota County and Newland Communities, the City can commence with the design of the project. As Council will recall, the project is scheduled to be built in two or three phases. The phase proposed for 2006 would include the grading of the roadway and the installation of the trunk water main. The roadway construction and bridge construction would occur in 2007 and the meandering of North Creek could occur in 2008, if not completed in 2007. BUDGET IMPACT The total project costs are estimated as outlined in the feasibility report fOlwarded to Council previously. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution authorizing preparation of the plans and specifications for the 19Sth Street Extension to TH 3. Once the plans are completed, staff will bring this issue back to Council for approval ofthe plans and specifications and authorization to put the project out to bid. 195'h Street Extension to Trunk Highway 3 February 21, 2006 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, Le~~,~ Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file RESOLUTION NO. R19-06 AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR PROJECT 06-05, 195THSTREET EXTENSION TO HIGHWAY 3 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting ofthe City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 st day of February, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members present: Members absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution. WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution approved by the Council on January 17,2006, the Council accepted a feasibility report on: Pro]. No. 06-05 ; and, Description Street and Bridge Improvements Location East of Embers Avenue to TH3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota that: 1. The Council will consider such street and utility improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of improvement of $12,133,000. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 20th day of March, 2006, in the Council Chambers at Farmington City Hall at 7:00 PM and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. 3. Erik G. Peters, P.E., is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans for the making of such improvement. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21 st day of February, 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of February, 2006. Acting City Administrator SEAL ~ Newland") Ii. COMMUNITIES AT THE HEART OF GREAT LIVING rrr:\7~ @ ~-o1v ,_c /11 } Ii. -'" . _w~ /!. '/, ,! i \, r ~F J 6 nil; i t- tu <: f::\ I j),J \J L- r L- --...._.._,,~~ . February 14,2006 Mr. Lee M. Mann City of Farmington 325 Oak St Farmington, MN 55024 RE: 19Sth Street Plan Design Dear Mr. Mann: The Farmington City Council approval ofthe 195th Street Feasibility Study and further endorsement by Dakota County Board's CIP are encouraging milestones leading to eventual construction of this road extension. To maintain future construction activities proposed in 2006, it makes sense to initiate design work. Our concept planning is underway, and we anticipate sharing ideas with city staff in April. As details of the master concept plan evolve, our objective is to gain concept approval with a coinciding development agreement that identifies shared costs for construction of 195th Street. However, the initial costs and complexities of design may be expensive and time-consuming, therefore, Newland Communities is committed to assisting with design review, planning with these design guidelines in mind, and participating in its proportionate share of roadway design costs as the proj ect moves forward. Please contact me at 952-942-7844 if you have questions. Sincerely, ~t2F~ Krista R. Flemming Vice President of Operations CC: Robin Roland, City of Farmington . -:1 .. ~~1t f t,~~:';~~~<& . - "t , ,., I u - . -.:: <:.;4"'~~,,~ DAKOTA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACnON 10.3 - Authorization To Execute Agreement With The City Of Farmington For County Project 64-18 Meeting Date: Item Type: Division: Department: Contact: Prepared by: Reviewed by: 1/31/06 Consent-Action PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT Transportation John P. Sass Telephone: 952-891-7130 John P. Sass NIA NIA Fiscal/FTE Impact: D None D Amount included in current budget D Budget amendment requested D FTE included in current complement D New FTE(s) requested-N/A IZI Other PURPOSE/ACTION REQUESTED . Authorize execution of an agreement with the City of Farmington for County Project (CP) 64-18 for construction of County Road (CR) 64 (195th Street) in Farmington. SUMMARY To promote an efficient transportation system throughout Dakota County, the City of Farmington is the lead agency for CP 64-18, which is the construction of future CR 64 (195th Street) from one mile east of County Sate Aid Highway (CSAH) 31 (Pilot Knob Road) to Trunk Highway (TH) 3 (Attachment A - Location Map). Backoround: On May 20, 2003 (Resolution No. 02-285), the Dakota County Board of Commissioners adopted the East West Corridor Preservation Study, which defined the general location of three new County roadways. The study identified the 195th Street alignment through the City of Farmington as a future County Minor Arterial route through the County (Alignment C). This alignment serves the transportation needs across multiple local jurisdictions including Farmington, Empire Township and the City of Lakeville by eventually connecting Interstate 35 to TH 3. Proiect Description: CP 64-18 will complete the connection of CSAH 31 with TH 3 via 195th Street, which is east west corridor alignment C. The proposed project will build two lanes of the roadway in 2006 and dedicate right of way for a future four-lane divided roadway section. The construction project includes a bridge crossing over North Creek (a tributary of the Vermillion River) and the Canadian Pacific Railroad lines. Wetland mitigation and channel rehabilitation of North Creek will be completed to support the bridge crossing. Storm sewer improvements and construction of a 10-foot trail on the north side of the new roadway are also included in the project. The preliminary design process for CP 64-18 determined the location of two minor road intersections to access pending development (Attachment B - Project Map). CP 64-18 consists of three segments. Segment 1 from Diamond Path to Deerbrook Path, segment 2 from Deerbrook Path to Street A and segment 3 from Street A to TH 3. The City of Farmington and Dakota County have a 2001 agreement that describes future project funding for 195th Street and the turn back of Akin Road. This agreement stipulates in part "the final extension project will be the subject of a separate, written agreement between the necessary parties when the project is being planned and designed." Consistent with the 2001 agreement, the County will participate in the construction cost of segment 2 between the minor intersections and in the engineering costs from Diamond Path to TH 3 (segments 1, 2 and 3). The City of Farmington desires to advance the improvements under two separate construction contracts in advance of Newland Communities development. The first contract for mass grading and water main construction is scheduled for the fall of 2006. The second contract for completion of bridge construction, drainage and road construction is scheduled for 2007. EXPLANATION OF FISCALlFTE IMPACT The City of Farmington and Dakota County have a 2001 agreement that describes future project funding for 195th Street and the turn back of Akin Road. The City of Farmington will fund all work on the project prior to the County's reimbursement of the project costs. The current estimated construction cost for segment 2 of CP 64-18 and the project engineering cost for segments 1,2, and 3 is $6,600,000. The project costs will be split in accordance with adopted County cost share policies. The County's 2006-2010 five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes $6,100,000 for CP 64-18 from 2006 through 2009. $610,000 is included in the 2006 one-year Capital Budget for design and an additional $5,490,000 is included in the 2007,2008 and 2009 Transportation CIP. To the extent funds are budgeted by the County Board, the remaining actual costs of CP 64-18 will be added to the CIP. 2/15/2006 9:20:21 AM Agenda Page No. c:\documents and settings\lmann\local settings\temporary internet files\olk23\jps1-31 cp64-18agreement.doc Supporting Documents: Attachment A - Location Map Attachment B - Project Map Previous Board Action(s): 02-285; May 20, 2003 RESOLUTION Authorization To Execute Agreement With The City Of Farmington For County Project 64-18 WHEREAS, on May 20, 2003 (Resolution No. 02-285), the Dakota County Board of Commissioners adopted the Dakota County East West Corridor Preservation Study; and WHEREAS, the adopted preservation corridor alignment C west of Trunk Highway (TH) 3 follows the proposed transition between 195th Street alignment and 190th Street alignment; and WHEREAS, the City of Farmington and Dakota County desire to make improvements to alignment C from one mile east of County Sate Aid Highway (CSAH) 31 (Pilot Knob Road) to TH 3; and WHEREAS, Dakota County has an existing agreement with the City of Farmington for participation in construction of the final extension of 195th Street to TH 3; and WHEREAS, provisions of the agreement stipulate that the final extension project will be the subject of a separate, written agreement between the necessary parties when the project is being planned and designed; and WHEREAS, County Project (CP) 64-18 will complete the connection of CSAH 31 with TH 3; and WHEREAS, CP 64-18 is the construction of alignment C as a future County Minor Arterial on a new alignment; and WHEREAS, entering into an agreement with the City of Farmington is necessary to define project costs and responsibilities and to proceed with the project; and WHEREAS, the City of Farmington desires to construct the improvements in 2006 in anticipation of County reimbursement in accordance with Dakota County Transportation Plan policies; and WHEREAS, the approved 2006-2010 Transportation Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes project costs of $6,100,000 for CP 64-18; and WHEREAS, the County will reimburse the City of Farmington for the County's share of the project costs, in accordance with adopted cost share policies, to the extent funds are budgeted by the County Board; and WHEREAS, the City of Farmington is the lead agency for CP 64-18 and anticipates construction to begin in 2006; and WHEREAS, Transportation Department staff support making the proposed improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Dakota County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes the Physical Development Director to execute an agreement with the City of Farmington for County Project 64-18, subject to approval by the County Attorney's Office as to form. Administrator's Comments: o Recommend Action o Do Not Recommend Action o Reviewed-No Recommendation o Reviewed-Information Only o Submitted at Commissioner Request Reviewed by (if required): o County Attorney's Office o Financial Services o Risk Management o Employee Relations o Information Technology o County Administrator 2/15/2006 9:20:21 AM Page 2 c:\documents and settings\lmann\local settings\temporary internet files\olk23~ps 1-31 cp64-18agreement.doc Agenda Page No. ".. '.). ~ () () (f) ..c: ...... o CO ...... 190th ST .. . COUNTY PROJECT 64-18 ~ 195th ST i:l ~ 8. ~ J:l .S! ~ 8. R ~ ] o u II ~ ., lOl ~ .0 "" i ~ FARMINGTON I~ II " II Attachment A Et1PIRE 197th ST II II II II ~.... 21 Oth ST COUNTY PROJECT 64-18 II II [)1 ...c: () ro :l +.l ~ () () " " o:l rIl Q) -' .... ::::!l, ml .-. ' I' . 'I 1 o , II ! i ! en 1 ' ..... , I I=l ' II ~~!, z o t--l ~ < Pot t--l """'--8 ~ P:= < /~ ~ z :::> o u II \ II II II II II " II II ~--------- ---- !II-U Vd ONO;VVIO ~""'eaaan~ \U_.._ 1/6 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: fl~l. / Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City Administrator \~\"/ FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids - Spruce Street Extension Project DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION At the October 18, 2004 City Council meeting, the Council ordered the Spruce Street Extension Project and authorized the preparation of plans and specifications. DISCUSSION The plans and specifications for the Spruce Street Extension project are ready for approval. The original improvements proposed for the project include the roadway, bridge, street lighting and storm sewer from Denmark Avenue to Vermillion River Crossings. During the design process, landscaping has been added to the median along Spruce Street. Trunk water main is also proposed to be constructed as a part of this project to serve the Spruce Street area, rather than being constructed in the future by the developer. Attached for Council's consideration is an exhibit that depicts gateway entry monuments that would be located at the intersection of Spruce Street and Denmark Avenue. The City has the option to include these monuments as an alternate bid item for the project. The gateway entry monuments are not a part of the original budget, however, if the bids for the project come in low enough, the Council may wish to consider the option of including the monuments in the project. Otherwise the monuments could be installed as part of a future project. BUDGET IMPACT The estimated project budget, as adjusted in the 2006-2010 CIP, is $3,350,000. The City has received a Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Development Grant in the amount of $955,000. The remainder of the actual project costs would be recovered as outlined in previous communications. The trunk water main (estimated project cost approximately $400,000) will be funded out of the trunk water fund. The estimated project cost for the Gateway Entry improvements is approximately Spruce Street Extension February 21,2006 Page 2 $490,000. Project costs include a 10% contingency and a 27% allowance for engineering, legal and administrative costs. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the Spruce Street Extension Project. Respectfully submitted, ~fv1~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file RESOLUTION NO. R -06 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS PROJECT 04-10, SPRUCE STREET EXTENSION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 2151 day of February, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, pursuant to the City Council's adoption of resolution R85-04, plans and specifications have been prepared with reference to the following improvements: Proi. No. 04-10 Description Street and Bridge Improvements Location South of CSAH 50, adjacent to and westerly from Denmark Avenue. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. The plans and specifications for the Spruce Street Extension project are approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the Farmington Independent and the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the construction of such improvement under the approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published at least once in the Farmington Independent and in the Construction Bulletin no less than three weeks before the last day for submission of bids. The advertisement shall specify the work to be done, shall state that the bids will be opened for consideration publicly at 10:00 a.m. on the 3151 day of March, 2006 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by two or more designated officers or agents of the municipality and tabulated in advance of the meeting at which they are to be considered by the Council, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the Clerk for 5% of the amount of each bid. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 2151 day of February, 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of February, 2006. Acting City Administrator SEAL " " //~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City Administrator V FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Consider Policy - Snow Removal on Sidewalk Along County Road DATE: February 21,2006 INTRODUCTION At the January 17, 2006 Council Meeting, Council requested that staff pursue obtaining easements from property owners fronting the Ash Street sidewalk to allow the City to perform snow removal. DISCUSSION Staff has notified all property owners, via letter, of the purpose and intent of the easement requested. Thus far 10 out of 12 positive responses have been received. Staff has been unable to contact one of the property owners. One property owner has indicated an unwillingness to grant the easement at this time. Four signed easements have been obtained. BUDGET/STAFFING IMPACT None at this time. ACTION REQUESTED For Council information. Respectfully Submitted, ~YJ1~ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file Values Statement Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional and cost-effective manner. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Ethics and Integrity We believe that ethics and integrity are the foundation blocks of public trust and confidence and that all meaningful relationships are built on these values. Open and Honest Communication We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. Cooperation and Teamwork We believe that the public is best served when departments and employees work cooperatively as a team rather than at cross purposes. Visionary Leadership and Planning We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be visionary and to plan for the future. Positive Relations with the Community We believe that positive relations with the community and public we serve leads to positive, involved, and active citizens. Professionalism We believe that continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism and are committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and the development of our employees. R55CKSUM LOG23000VO COUNCIL MEETING ON FEBRUARY 21, 2006 Vendor 10,000 LAKES CHPTR-INT'L CONF ADAM, MARTIN Business Unit BUILDING INSPECTIONS RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Object TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE Amount 175.00 175.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 38.00 38.00 AFFINITY PLUS FEDERAL CREDIT U 2,500.00 2,500.00 AL'S LOCK AND KEY ALCORN BEVERAGE CO. INC. ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RETIRE AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER AQUILA ARCTIC GLACIER ICE BANK OF NEW YORK, THE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES FIRE SERVICES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE PERM IMP REVOLVING FUND 2001C REVENUE BONDS 2001A & 2001 B CREDIT UNION PAYABLE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 125.56- 105.56 55.00 35.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 11,133.15 14,069.39 25,202.54 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 1,379.68 1,379.68 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 80.00 80.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 30.95 30.95 EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 2,812.13 2,812.13 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 73.59 73.59 NATURAL GAS 453.59 453.59 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 75.02 120.86 195.88 FISCAL AGENT FEES FISCAL AGENT FEES L"'J 250.00 1,150.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 2 2/6/2006 - 2/1712006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 1,400.00 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS MN SALES TAX DUE 545.22- FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 8,933.22 8,388.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 136.32 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 66.26 202.58 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 39.97 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND COFFEE FUND 119.93 159.90 BJERKE, DWIGHT BUILDING MAINT SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 100.00 100.00 BOYER TRUCKS SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 979.21 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 79.57 1,058.78 BREISACHER, WAYNE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 19.23 19.23 BURNSVILLE, CITY OF PATROL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,099.44 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 549.73 1,649.17 CANNON VALLEY PRINTING RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 1,415.61 1,415.61 CAREY, TODD ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 360.00 360.00 CARQUEST PATROL SERVICES VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 104.47 ENGINEERING SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 18.46 STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 25.70 SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS NATURAL RESOURCES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 49.13 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 111.44 + FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 558.07 867.27 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 3 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount CASE CREDIT SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 1,341.94 1,341.94 CATCO PARTS SERVICE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 186.56 18656 CDW GOVERNMENT INC FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 2,588.12 2,588.12 CINTAS - 754 POLICE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 39.11 STREET MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 26.93 PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 51.21 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 2.16 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37.54 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 26.93 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 46.94 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 85.36 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 46.94 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 26.93 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9.38 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 26.93 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 46.94 FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 51.67 FLEET OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 17.88 542.85 CLEAR VIEW GLASS ICE ARENA MN SALES TAX DUE 8.45- ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 138.45 130.00 CMI MAILING & MARKETING SVS RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 940.15 940.15 CNH CAPITAL STREET MAINTENANCE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 393.42 PARK MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 329.94 723.36 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 589.60 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 711.70 1,301.30 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 4 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount COFFEE GUYS SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 222.00 222.00 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 8,328.65 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 9,758.55 18,087.20 CONOCOPHILLlPS FLEET FIRE SERVICES FUELS & LUBRICANTS 89.65 SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES FUEL 138.54 228.19 COOPER, KELLY RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112.00 112.00 CORRIGAN, TROY FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 425.62 425.62 CRAWFORD DOOR SALES OF GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET MN SALES TAX DUE 51.51- BUILDING MAINT SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 844.01 792.50 CULLIGAN ULTRAPURE INDUSTRIES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 11.40 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 11.40 22.80 D R HORTON SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 128.49 128.49 DAKOTA COUNTY LICENSE CENTER FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE LICENSES, TAXES, FEES 926.50 926.50 DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER/AUDITO PATROL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,618.00 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 797.00 2,415.00 DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 930.29 930.29 DAVIS, TREY RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 166.00 166.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 716.20 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 5 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 472.95 1,189.15 DEGRAND, BRICE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160.00 160.00 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 500.00 500.00 DICK'S SANITATION INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,538.09 21,538.09 DISTAD, RANDY RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 35.00 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 52.96 87.96 DIVERSIFIED CRYOGENICS PATROL SERVICES VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 176.11 176.11 DUEBERS DEPT STORE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DEPOSITS PAYABLE 253.99 253.99 DYNAMEX PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 46.41 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50.19 96.60 EDGINGTON, HEATHER SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 200.00 200.00 EIDE BAILLY LLP GENERAL ACCOUNTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,307.77 HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,208.48 ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 458.50 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 327.50 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 327.50 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 556.75 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 556.75 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 556.75 7,300.00 EMPIRE TOWNSHIP STREET CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 850.12 850.12 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/1612006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 6 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 224.00 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 288.00 512.00 FARMINGTON EMPLOYEE CLUB EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE CLUB 49.00 49.00 FARMINGTON PRINTING INC ENGINEERING SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.37 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.22 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 132.13 164.72 FERRELL GAS PRODUCTS CO ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE FUEL 140.58 140.58 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 204.39 204.39 FIRST CHOICE TOURS SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 269.00 269.00 FRADGLEY, KIMBERLEY E SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150.00 150.00 FRIEDGES EXCAVATING INC SILVER SPRINGS PARK OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 3,010.00 3,010.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP TELEPHONE 131.36 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE TELEPHONE 131.35 262.71 GALLS INCORPORATED PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 121.98 121.98 GERSTER JEWELERS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET MN SALES TAX DUE 1.95- HUMAN RESOURCES OTHER 31.95 30.00 GRAFIX SHOPPE PATROL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 106.50 106.50 GRAINGER INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 106.97 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 7 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 106.97 GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES OF MN IN SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 199.50 199.50 GRIGGS COOPER II. CO DOWNTOWN IIQI lOR RFV II. FXP C01';T OF GOOD1'; 1';01 D 1219466 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 6,477.50 18,672.16 HAAN, WILLIAM RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 51.00 51.00 HAPPY HARRY'S FURNITURE CAPITAL ACQUISITION MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 1,616.67 1,616.67 HARMON AUTO GLASS PATROL SERVICES VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 277.81 SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 139.56 417.37 HEALTH COUNSELING SEVICES LLC RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 260.00 260.00 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FIRE SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 241.60 241.60 HOHENSTEINS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 423.50 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 340.75 764.25 HOLLATZ, LEE POLICE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 62.92 62.92 HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY WATER UTILITY EXPENSE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 2,338.74 2,338.74 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND ICMA PAYABLE 5,026.92 5,026.92 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 841.62 841.62 IMAGETECH SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.47 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 8 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount ENGINEERING SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.47 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.47 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.47 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.47 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.48 416.83 INGLING, HOLLY GENERAL FUND REVENUES RECREATION FEES - GENERAL 23.00 23.00 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PATROL SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 1,000.00 1,000.00 INTERSTATE BATTERY TWIN CITIES STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 64.91 FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 10.52 75.43 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, CITY OF RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 289.25 289.25 JG WEAR RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 304.00 304.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPAN DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 8,517.46 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 11,225.88 19,743.34 KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 214.25 214.25 KEEPRSINC PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 112.84 112.84 KWIK TRIP BUILDING INSPECTIONS FUEL 137.12 PATROL SERVICES FUEL 1,709.20 FIRE SERVICES FUEL 146.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES FUEL 136.87 STREET MAINTENANCE FUEL 1,285.55 SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES FUEL 206.47 NATURAL RESOURCES FUEL 511.23 PARK MAINTENANCE FUEL 263.76 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES FUEL 84.50 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 9 2/6/2006 - 2/1712006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES FUEL 129.74 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE FUEL 54.75 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS FUEL 3,355.55 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE FUEL 272.72 FLEET OPERATIONS FUEL 78.52 8 37:> 74 LAKEVILLE VACUUM FIRE SERVICES EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 133.13 133.13 LAMETTRYS COLLISION LAKEVILLE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 1,055.04 1,055.04 LARSON, LENA SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 5.82 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 10.52 16.34 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND LELS DUES PAYABLE 240.50 240.50 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES - P LEGISLATIVE CONTROL TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 380.00 380.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30,096.25 INSURANCE INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE 254.95 30,351.20 LEXISNEXIS INVESTIGATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150.00 150.00 LIFT STAK STOR PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 155.49 155.49 LONE OAK COMPANIES INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE POSTAGE 150.00 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 8.23 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS POSTAGE 150.00 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 8.22 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS POSTAGE 150.00 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 8.22 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE POSTAGE 150.00 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 8.24 632.91 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page- 10 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount LUHMAN, TYLER RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 57.00 57.00 LUND MARTIN CONSTRUCTION INC FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 634,578.00 634,578.00 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 150.00 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 181.28 FLEET OPERATIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 150.00 481.28 MARK VII DISTRIBUTORS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,778.77 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,781.55 6,560.32 MAXIMUM VOLTAGE PATROL SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 29.99 29.99 MBPTA BUILDING INSPECTIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 100.00 100.00 MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 200.00 200.00 MEDICA EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 41,646.14 41,646.14 METRO ALARM SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 3,168.38 3,168.38 METRO FIRE FIRE SERVICES EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 333.21 333.21 METRO PEST MANAGEMENT FIRE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 56.29 56.29 METROCALL INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 1.87 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 1.87 3.74 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE SAC CHARGE RETAINER 36,828.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 11 2/6/2006 - 2/1712006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 36,828.00 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 432.00 432.00 MINNESOT" "FSCME COI 'NCIL #5 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE 1'111IIf'l AI'!=:r.MI' IINI(}N nlll'!=: PAYARI F 669 40 669.40 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN 1,775.53 1,775.53 MINNESOTA, STATE OF ASH STREET PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 263.63 263.63 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 992.60 992.60 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 515.00 515.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND GARNISHMENT PAYABLE 287.25 287.25 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 50.00 50.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA LIFE INS PAYABLE 82.00 82.00 MN OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNO PATROL SERVICES TELEPHONE 74.00 74.00 MOGENSEN, GLENN STREET MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 100.00 100.00 MOLNAR. BRANDON RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 51.00 51.00 MOODY COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 175.00 175.00 MOORE MEDICAL CORP RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 24.64 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 12 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 24.64 MUZAK - NORTH CENTRAL DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 56.98 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 57.03 114.01 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION CELLULAR PHONES 167.40 HUMAN RESOURCES CELLULAR PHONES 54.43 BUILDING INSPECTIONS CELLULAR PHONES 147.14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CELLULAR PHONES 38.28 PATROL SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 773.88 FIRE SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 217.86 ENGINEERING SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 299.57 PARK MAINTENANCE CELLULAR PHONES 217.72 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 92.71 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 179.44 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS CELLULAR PHONES 20.57 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP CELLULAR PHONES 38.32 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 149.66 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS CELLULAR PHONES 239.85 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 149.65 FLEET OPERATIONS CELLULAR PHONES 54.43 2,840.91 NIBBE, MICHAEL M BUILDING MAINT SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 93.00 93.00 NORTH TRAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 200.00 200.00 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 117.30 117.30 O'LEARY, TIM & ANNETTE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 26.51 26.51 OFFICEMAX - A BOISE COMPANY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,545.35 1,545.35 OLSON, DAN SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 146.45 146.45 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/1612006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page. 13 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount ORKIN EXTERMINATING BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 85.23 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.16 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.16 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4.03 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 88.59 '1R 17 PAUSTIS WINE CO. DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 340.00 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 728.99 1,068.99 PC MALL FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 1,380.40 1,380.40 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,412.00 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,891.68 4,303.68 PINE BEND LANDFILL INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,415.53 15,415.53 POS BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 75.93 75.93 PRIVATE UNDERGROUND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 332.00 332.00 PROGUARD SPORTS INC ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD 271.37 271.37 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO OF AME EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,435.07 2,435.07 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA PAYABLE 10,658.10 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA 11,875.87 22,533.97 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,681.71 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 6,932.12 10,613.83 R & R SPECIAL TIES OF WISCONSIN ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 48.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/161200610:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 14 2/6/2006 - 2117/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 48.00 RAHMAN, LAURA RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 127.00 127.00 RAMBLING RED ROSES - LAKEVILLE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 100.00 100.00 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 108.12 108.12 REINHOLD, CHRISTINE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 100.00 100.00 RENNER & SONS, E H WELL #8 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 84,685.07 84,685.07 RISTOW, GERALD RISTOW & JOHN ASH STREET PROJECT LAND 11,448.90 11,448.90 RIVERTOWN NEWPAPER GROUP POLICE ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 33.00 FIRE SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 33.00 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 33.00 99.00 ROC INC FIRE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 216.20 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,883.13 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 858.39 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214.60 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214.60 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 42.92 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214.60 3,644.44 RYAN,RALPH SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 331.65 331.65 SAUBER PLUMBING & HEATING CO. PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,745.25 1,745.25 SKILLPATH SEMINARS PLANNING & ZONING TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 299.00 299.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Council Check Summary Page - 15 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount SPECIALTY WINES AND BEVERAGES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 358.50 358.50 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC - 00 BUILDING INSPECTIONS FUEL 36.64 PATROL SER\lICES 1'111'1 1 658 76 FIRE SERVICES FUEL 193.55 STREET MAINTENANCE FUEL 35.55 PARK MAINTENANCE FUEL 416.07 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE FUEL 177.20 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS FUEL 439.45 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE FUEL 53.89 FLEET OPERATIONS FUEL 34.33 3,045.44 SPRINT PATROL SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 392.14 392.14 STAR TRIBUNE ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 112.58 HUMAN RESOURCES EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING 1,456.80 1,569.38 STERLING CODIFIERS INC ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,034.00 1,034.00 STREICHER'S PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 622.85 INVESTIGATION SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 161.90 784.75 THREE RIVERS PRK DISTRICT RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 128.00 128.00 TIME MAGAZINE POLICE ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 19.95 19.95 TROPHY HOUSE INC, THE FIRE SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 105.17 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 1,022.93 1,128.10 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 12.13 12.13 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO Vendor UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Business Unit NATURAL RESOURCES VERIZON WIRELESS FIRE SERVICES RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES VIDEOTRONIX INC POLICE ADMINISTRATION VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER SEVV'ER OPERATIONS EXPENSE WASTEQUIP/RAYFO SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS WINE MERCHANTS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE XCELENERGY PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINT SERVICES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP SEVV'ER OPERATIONS EXPENSE ZEE SERVICE COMPANY SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS ZWART, BOB STREET MAINTENANCE CITY OF FARMINGTON Council Check Summary 2/6/2006 - 2/17/2006 Object TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE CELLULAR PHONES CELLULAR PHONES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Report Totals Amount 280.00 280.00 8.30 7.06 15.36 150.00 150.00 55.00 55.00 319.50 319.50 689.84 1,025.88 1,715.72 839.50 1,088.02 552.76 135.65 4,792.64 107.77 24.73 7,541.07 54.55 54.55 100.00 100.00 1,127,153.57 2/16/2006 10:26:05 Page - 16 &p VALS: SODERBERG FOGARTY MCKNIGHT PRITZLAFF WILSON lJp. GW-