Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01.03.06 Council Packet City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA PRE-CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 3,2006 6:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA 5. STAFF COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT ouncil workshops are conducted as an informal work session, all discussions shall be considered fact-finding, hypothetical and unofficial critical thinking exercises, which do not reflect an official public position. Council work session outcomes should not be construed by the attending public and/or reporting media as the articulation of a formal City policy position. Only official Council action normally taken at a regularly scheduled Council meeting should be considered as a formal expression of the City's position on any given matter. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promisingfuture. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 3, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) . CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (12/19/05 Regular) b) Boards and Commissions Attendance - Administration c) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation - Police Department d) Approve Assessment Agreement - Ash Street Project - Engineering e) Approve Change Order - Fire Station Proj ect - Engineering f) School and Conference - Fire Department g) Adopt Resolution - Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids - Parks and Recreation h) Adopt Resolution - Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids - Parks and Recreation i) Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation j) Adopt Resolution - Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment Concerning Existing and Proposed Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan Map - Parks and Recreation k) Approve LMCIT Excess Liability Coverage - Finance 1) Approve CDBG Allocation - Community Development m) Approve Bills 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Liquor License Suspension - B&B Pizza - Police Department b) Liquor License Suspension - VFW - Police Department c) Liquor License Suspension - Ugly Mug - Police Department d) Liquor License Suspension - Oasis Market - Police Department e) Liquor License Suspension - New Moon Buffet - Police Department Action Taken Approved Information Received R1-06 Approved Approved Approved R2-06 R3-06 Information Received Pulled Approved 1/17/06 Approved Approved Suspension Approved Suspension Pulled Pulled Pulled 9. AWARDOFCONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Annual Organizational Matters - Administration b) Adopt Parks and Recreation Department Strategic Revenue Plan - Parks and Recreation 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN Appointed; R4-06 Adopted City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 3, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Action Taken 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (12/19/05 Regular) b) Boards and Commissions Attendance - Administration c) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation - Police Department d) Approve Assessment Agreement - Ash Street Project - Engineering e) Approve Change Order - Fire Station Project - Engineering f) School and Conference - Fire Department g) Adopt Resolution - Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids - Parks and Recreation h) Adopt Resolution - Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids - Parks and Recreation i) Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation j) Adopt Resolution - Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment Concerning Existing and Proposed Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan Map - Parks and Recreation k) Approve LMCIT Excess Liability Coverage - Finance 1) Approve CDBG Allocation - Community Development m) Approve Bills Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Liquor License Suspension - B&B Pizza - Police Department b) Liquor License Suspension - VFW - Police Department c) Liquor License Suspension - Ugly Mug - Police Department d) Liquor License Suspension - Oasis Market - Police Department e) Liquor License Suspension - New Moon Buffet - Police Department Page 14 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Annual Organizational Matters - Administration b) Adopt Parks and Recreation Department Strategic Revenue Plan - Parks and Recreation Page 15 Page 16 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN 7~ COUNCIL MINUTES PRE-MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 6:30 p.m. Members Present: Wilson Members Absent: Also Present: Soderberg, Fogarty (arrived 6:38 p.m.), McKnight, Pritzlaff, None Elliott Knetsch, City Attorney; Robin Roland, Acting City Administrator/Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant 2. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaffto approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mr. Gary Green, 705 5th Street, stated he is a member of the NA and AA groups and they have a concern with the increase in the meeting room rental at the Rambling River Center. Two of the meetings are quite small, but they may have to discontinue the Monday night meeting if the rates go up. They appreciate the beautiful facility and take very good care of it. They have a large influx of people from the counseling center and are working with DWI people. They believe they are making the town a better place. The meetings are published statewide. They want to keep the meetings growing and the need is growing. 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA Councilmember McKnight commented about the proposed concept review policy for the southeast region. Regarding zone B, he would like to see the MUSA Review Committee recommendation moved up in the process from step 5 to step 3. This would be before final review of the concept plan by staff, Planning Commission and Council. Community Development Director Carroll noted the problem with moving the MUSA recommendation ahead of the annexation, is the City may not have the legal right to grant MUSA to property that is not in the City. Councilmember McKnight stated nothing says we have to vote, the committee can still do their work. Staff noted that would involve breaking step 5 into two separate steps. The other issue with putting the MUSA ahead of the annexation and the concept plan is that the City would be talking with the township about the annexation of property without giving them clear indication of what it would be used for. As far as MUSA is concerned, that would be a similar issue. Previously staff ... '. ..~ Council Minutes (Pre-Meeting) December 19,2005 Page 2 requested concept plans from all of the MUSA applicants so the MUSA Review Committee would have that information. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated ifthe MUSA Committee would meet four times a year and stays on top of everything can it still stay at step 5. Councilmember McKnight liked the idea ofthe MUSA Committee meeting quarterly. Councilmember McKnight asked about the change order for the Ash Street project. City Engineer Mann explained the change. Councilmember McKnight then asked about the Seed/Genstar property annexation and asked for an explanation of going the tax route compared to using building permit fees for Castle Rock. Community Development Director Carroll stated an orderly annexation agreement already exists with the Seed property. That is not the case with Castle Rock. The annexation agreement did not address the issue of property tax sharing. It did not appear to the EFP AC Committee that a conscious decision was made to not share property tax revenue. It did not seem fair that because Empire was cooperating with the annexation they would be deprived of the property tax revenues. Staff recommended the minimum property taxes they would be entitled to under the statute is what they would get. Councilmember Wilson wanted to pull item 7f) Approve 2006 Tax Levy and Budget to vote on it separately from the rest of the Consent Agenda items. Regarding the 2006 Fee Schedule he received some information but asked if Administrative Services Director Shadick would be providing more insight into the changes. Each department head will address their increases in fees. Councilmember Wilson asked about the Rambling River Center fees and what percentage the non-profit groups use the Rambling River Center compared to other groups. Parks and Recreation Director Distad stated he can provide that to Council at a later time. Acting City Administrator Roland noted the structure was changed a few years ago to not single out anyone particular non-profit group, merely to address categories of groups. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked about the sewer sharing with Lakeville and if that has any affect on the capacity in that area. City Engineer Mann stated the sewer line in place now has room for additional capacity. If more capacity is needed, the developer will replace the current pipe with a larger pipe. 5. STAFF COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to adjourn at 6:46 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, ~~Jr?~ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR DECEMBER 19, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Soderberg led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Elliott Knetsch, Acting City Attorney; Robin Roland, Acting City Administrator/Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Ben and Jessica Rowan, Chris and Ravit Berg Audience: 4. APPROVE AGENDA Councilmember McKnight pulled item 7k) Proposed Concept Review Policy (Southeast Region) and Proposed Criteria Regarding Multi-Family and Medium-to-High Density Housing for discussion. Councilmember Wilson pulled item 7f) 2006 Tax Levy and Budget to vote on it separately. Acting City Administrator Roland added supplemental item 1 Oc) Management Assessment for City Administrator Candidates. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS 7. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approved Council Minutes (12/5/05 Regular) (11/30/05 & 12/8/05 Special) b) Approved Temporary On-Sale Liquor License - Administration Council Minutes (Regular) December 19, 2005 Page 2 c) Adopted RESOLUTION R132-05 Approved Gambling Event Permit- Administration d) Adopted RESOLUTION R133-05 Approved Gambling Event Permit - Administration e) Authorized Advertisement for Bid Sale of Garbage Containers and Lids - Parks and Recreation g) Received Information November 2005 Financial Report - Finance h) Approved Sewer Sharing with Lakeville - Engineering i) Approved Assessment Agreements - Ash Street Project - Engineering j) Approved Change Order Ash Street Project - Engineering 1) Adopted Joint RESOLUTION R136-05 Approved Seed/Genstar Property Annexation - Community Development m) Adopted RESOLUTION R137-05 Approved 2006 Non-Bargaining COLA Agreement - Human Resources n) Adopted RESOLUTION R138-05 Approved Clerical, Technical, Professional Contract - Human Resources 0) Adopted RESOLUTION R139-05 Approved Maintenance Contract - Human Resources p) Approved Bills APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 1) Adopt Resolution - Approve 2006 Tax Levy and Budget - Finance It is required by statute that a tax levy resolution and a budget resolution be passed in order to certify it to the county by December 28, 2005. MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaffto adopt RESOLUTION R134-05 setting the 2006 collectible property tax levy and adopt RESOLUTION R135-05 approving the 2006 Budget and revising the 2005 Budget. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. k) Approve Proposed Concept Review Policy (Southeast Region) and Proposed Criteria Regarding Multi-Family and Medium-to-High Density Housing- Community Development Councilmember McKnight was concerned with the process for Zone B properties and the timing for the MUSA Review Committee to have input. Councilmember Pritzlaffrecalled Councilmember Fogarty had suggested the MUSA Review Committee begin meeting quarterly. Councilmember McKnight would leave the process as is if they meet quarterly. The MUSA Committee is an important group from which to receive input. Staff suggested that ifthere are no items to discuss, the meeting could be cancelled until the next quarter. Councilmember Fogarty would like the MUSA Committee meetings to begin shortly after the first of the year. MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto approve the concept review process for the Southeast region and the multi-family and medium-to-high density housing criteria. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Council Minutes (Regular) December 19,2005 Page 3 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Adopt Ordinance - Approving 2006 Fee Schedule - Administration Staff presented proposed fee changes effective January 1, 2006. Each department head gave an overview of the proposed changes for their area. Mr. Gary Green, 705 5th Street, stated the non-profit groups are concerned about the increase in the Class 2 fees for room rental at the Rambling River Center. The people attending the meetings have no money. It is difficult for them to come up with any contributions. The meetings are self-supporting. The money that does come into the meetings is needed for books, materials, etc. He brought in a Tuesday night meeting and there is a speaker meeting once a month on Saturday. To add a speaker meeting for every Saturday would add another $30, this would bring the total for all the meetings to $70. He believed the rates are approaching an uncompetitive rate in the area to hold meetings such as this. When they have to come up with that much money on a regular basis, some of them will move out and buy their own building and that money will go out of town. They want to use the Rambling River Center. It is a beautiful facility and Missie Kohlbeck is a wonderful administrator. She helps them out constantly. They appreciate what they do have and they want to keep it going. Staff had proposed a $5 increase for rental ofthe meeting room for Class 2 groups. The fee for 2006 would be $15. Councilmember Fogarty was concerned with increasing this fee as the fee was just established last year and would like to see it stay at $10. Councilmember McKnight agreed with not changing this fee. Councilmember Wilson also agreed to leave the room rental fee at $10, but was concerned with the $30 discontinuance fee for garbage service. Staff surveyed other cities and private companies and they do charge a discontinuance fee and the proposed $30 is within the range. Councilmember Pritzlaff also did not agree with increasing the Class 2 fees for room rental. Mrs. Ravit Berg, 5241 203rd Street, commented about the garbage discontinuance fee and asked why people cannot leave their containers in the garage. Councilmember Wilson explained there has been an issue with residents leaving town and not notifying the City when they returned and began using the garbage service again. Mayor Soderberg noted rules are put in place for people that do not follow them. Some come back early and get garbage service for no cost because the driver sees a can and empties it. Mrs. Berg asked how you could cheat if you already paid for the can. Your garbage can only be picked up if you have a can. You put the garbage out and you obviously paid for the can. Mayor Soderberg clarified this is for people who leave town for 3-4 months and discontinue their servIce. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight adopting ORDINANCE 005-546 establishing 2006 charges and fees for licenses and Council Minutes (Regular) December 19, 2005 Page 4 permits effective January 1, 2006 except the Rambling River Center Class 2 fee which is to remain at $10. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) 203rd Street Wetland Buffers - Engineering (This item was moved forward to accommodate the audience). At the last meeting Council considered two cases regarding wetland buffers at 5215 203rd Street, owned by Benjamin and Jessica Rowan, and 5241 203rd Street, owned by Christopher and Ravit Berg. At the last meeting Council considered the issue with the Rowan's and the fact improvements were in place at the time the buffer issue was identified. It was discussed that the Rowan's would be able to keep their sod and sprinkler system to the rear property line. Regarding the Berg's property, Council asked for a timeline ofthe discussions and communications with the resident regarding the buffer. For the Rowan's property, Council was asked to consider allowing an Encroachment Agreement of the sprinkler system and in the drainage and utility easement, contingent on the owner signing the agreement. Regarding the Berg's property the recommendation was staffbe directed to require the removal ofthe encroaching items from the City property and the buffer at the owner's expense. Council considered the Rowan's property first. Mayor Soderberg recalled the Rowan's presented a timeline at the last meeting regarding when items were approved. He felt the Encroachment Agreement compromised the buffer. The City made some errors so the City needs to correct those errors, but he still would like to see the conservation easement maintained. He asked Council to consider having the City restore the buffer and pay for the moving ofthe sprinkler system so the conservation easement remains intact. The City made errors in permitting and inspections and the Rowan's are not at fault, but we need to maintain the integrity ofthe conservation easement. Councilmember Pritzlaffnoted with the original compromise owners did gain footage in their backyards. He felt making an exception for one would create problems later. He felt the City needed to make it right and agreed with Mayor Soderberg. Councilmember Wilson stated if we make an exception for the Rowan's, we are treating properties inconsistently. He supported the Mayor's recommendation. Councilmember McKnight agreed with the concept of treating everyone the same, but felt there were too many extenuating circumstances. He was willing to leave the 10ft. as sod. Councilmember Fogarty agreed with Councilmember McKnight, but wanted to hear what the Rowan's had to say. Mr. Ben Rowan, 5215 203rd Street, stated he was shocked by what is happening now based on two weeks ago when Council was in agreement with leaving the property as is. He felt they presented the facts and did not understand why it was changing. Mayor Soderberg stated he wanted to treat everyone consistently. If Council requires one to maintain a conservation easement, he wanted all to maintain the conservation easement. We started with a wetland buffer and tried to reach a compromise that would protect the wetland as well as release as much Council Minutes (Regular) December 19, 2005 Page 5 property as possible. He did not want to treat one property different from another. What happened on the Rowan's property was no fault of their own. The City made errors in granting permits and approving inspections and not identifying the conservation easement as being encroached upon. To be fair, the Mayor felt the City should restore that area, so the Rowan's would not bear the cost. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated he would like to treat each property on a case by case basis, but that will not work. By the compromise they did gain some footage in their backyard. Mrs. Jessica Rowan, 5215 203rd Street, stated they were treated differently from everyone else. Others were aware of the conservation easement before their landscaping was installed. The Rowan's was approved and then they found out about the easement. Mayor Soderberg stated there were mistakes made and now the question is how to make it right. If they had installed the improvements knowing the buffer existed and where the line was, the Rowans' would be required to pay to restore it. Because the City made some errors, we need to make it right. We still have a conservation easement. The Rowan's have great evidence showing they did nothing wrong, so the Mayor was willing to have the City restore the buffer. Councilmember Wilson stated tonight he received a copy of the Development Contract dated October 21, 2002 and it references the wetland buffer and natural area signs. The developer was given the information from the City to pass on to the builder which clearly shows there is a wetland buffer for every home on the north and northeast area of203rd Street. He felt they were making the Rowan's situation consistent with everyone else. Councilmember Pritzlaff added a lot of these situations are a communication problem between the developer, builder, and the property owner. Mr. Rowan stated they will lose the sale oftheir home because of this and it will affect the presentation of their home this spring with the backyard torn up. Their property will not be presentable to a buyer. Ifleft as is, it would be sold or at least in the spring it will look nice. Mayor Soderberg stated it would not be restored until spring. Mr. Rowan stated last week Council was on board with leaving it as is, and now half the Council has changed their mind and given no support for it except admitting fault. They have a sale pending and will not be able to sell it in the spring so for the Rowan's this is a huge issue. Mayor Soderberg asked Mr. Rowan how Council answers their neighbors when they want Council to vacate their property back to the property line and vacate the conservation easement. Mr. Rowan stated Council could show them the timeline, that they were the first ones in the neighborhood. Mayor Soderberg stated that will not matter to anyone else, but he would be treating one property different from another. Staff noted there were other properties that had to do restoration work and some will be done next year. Mr. Rowan stated their situation is unique because they had a permit pulled for their sprinkler system and no one else did Council Minutes (Regular) December 19,2005 Page 6 and they had their escrow money released and no one else did. These are two distinct things that Council could stand behind in dealing with others. Ms. Amy Greek, 5349 203rd Street W, asked when the Rowan's moved in. They moved in November 2003. Ms. Greek stated they were the first ones with sod on the street and landscaping. They built with College City and people who used other builders did not know about the wetland buffers. She found it hard to believe when everyone received the same survey certificate that shows the wetland buffer when they purchased the house and also received covenants that show residents are not allowed to go into the wetland buffers, that the Rowans did not know about this. She knows the Rowan's knew the wetland buffer was there, because the sign was up before they put sod in, because the day that the sod went in she called the City informing them the sod was installed past the sign. The Greek's had asked for a variance when they built and were told they could not have it because of the conservation easement. She was told the City would speak to the Rowan's about the sod. She found it hard to believe when there was a sign in every yard. They also pulled permits for a sprinkler system, sod, and received their escrow money. Ms. Ravit Berg, 5241 203rd Street, stated regarding the Rowan's property the wetland buffer affects everyone on 203rd Street. She felt everyone should be supplied with the same correspondence. In the correspondence it states that the Rowan's called the City and they were told they were not allowed to install sod and sprinklers and they still proceeded to do so. Mrs. Berg agreed everyone should be treated equally. lfthe City provides the seed to restore the wetland buffer, that is fine. She felt no special consideration should be given and objected to the City paying for the sod. Her second issue is that anywhere the City wants to restore the wetland buffer, they should pay for that also. Mr. Rowan stated as far as the comments from Ms. Greek, he found it interesting that she knows what the Rowan's knew about when he has never talked to her until a couple weeks ago. As far as Ms. Berg's comments, she was speaking about a date of September 2004 and their work was done in July 2004. He has a picture from September 9, 2004 showing the sign and their work was done prior to that. Mr. Derek Christensen, 5289 203rd Street, stated he brought this to Council 1 0 months ago and fought to get his property back. They waited to spring to develop their back yard and noticed that is when the buffer signs were installed. He felt there were a lot of people that did not know the buffer was on their property. He felt it would only be fair to give everyone their land back or treat everyone the same. Councilmember Wilson stated what he was agreeing to now is different than what he agreed to last week. His preference would be to vacate the buffer for all residents, but that is not realistic. Beyond that, we have to look at it consistently. Council Minutes (Regular) December 19,2005 Page 7 The Rowan's are trying to make their property presentable to put it on the market. He asked how quickly the work can be done and what can be done to minimize the impact to their yard. City Engineer Mann replied anytime they do work in a yard they try to make as little impact as possible. As far as when the work can start, depends on the weather. They would have to meet with the contractor to work out a plan. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked what the cost would be for the work on the Rowan's property. Staff estimated it to be approximately $2,000. The sod would be pulled out and a fabric blanket would be put down over the seed. It would take 2-3 weeks for some things to begin to grow. Mayor Soderberg asked the Rowan's if they would be willing to grant a Conservation Easement if the City restores the buffer up to the conservation easement line. Mr. Rowan replied if that is their only option. Their biggest concern is selling their home. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated his concern is at what point do they stop the City's cost if someone else comes in. Mayor Soderberg stated the Rowan's documented that the City erred. If there is no documentation, a permit was not required, no inspection was done, then the land owner would be responsible. Acting City Attorney Knetsch agreed this was an excellent distinction to make. They are different situations. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Pritzlaff to direct City staff to restore the wetland buffer to either the wetland buffer line or the conservation easement line, if a Conservation Easement is granted, at City expense. Councilmember McKnight felt a dollar is too much of taxpayers' money to fix this error. Mayor Soderberg and Councilmember Pritzlaff agreed, but Mayor Soderberg noted the City made an error and felt this was the best way to make it right. Councilmember Fogarty stated she intends to vote against this because her concern is that the Rowan's had no forewarning of this change from the last meeting and she has not had the opportunity to speak with the Rowan's. Voting for: Soderberg, Pritzlaff, Wilson. Voting against: Fogarty, McKnight. MOTION CARRIED. The next property discussed is at 5241 203rd Street owned by Chris and Ravit Berg. Staff provided documentation of communications with the Berg's. Mrs. Berg noted at the last meeting and in the documentation there was a wetland buffer workshop. She stated they were not notified of this workshop. They distributed a petition among the residents along the wetland that they also did not know about the workshop. She is glad to see that all residents will be treated equally. There were two Councilmembers that called the Berg's and took their time to try to understand the issue. They would like to be informed regarding everything that has happened with the wetland issue. They did receive the Conservation Easement documents three weeks ago, but only received the new survey this week. Mrs. Berg stated the Council is working for them and would like the Council to take more time to understand them. They are not getting what they voted for. When she votes for Councilmembers she would like them to be more understanding than the majority of the people. It would be nice to have a Council Minutes (Regular) December 19, 2005 Page 8 real workshop with all the residents invited. As some Councilmembers took time to come to their home and tried to understand their situation, they will move the pond to the other side ofthe yard. As it is frozen now, this would happen in April. Their landscaper is willing to move it. Mrs. Berg wanted to make it mandatory that in April, City Engineer Mann will come to their yard and physically stake the pond, take a picture of the staked area, and they will dig a hole to make the pond. Her other issue is the erosion problem in the backyard. On the eastern comer of the yard there is a hump which is on City property. They will move the rocks from this area. If this is done, there will be erosion from the City property to the neighbors. Ifthe Berg's are asked to remove the rocks, she does not want to hear a single complaint or receive a call from staff or the neighbors to replace more sod. They did a favor for the City of paying for the rocks to retain the erosion. She is only willing to move the pond if City Engineer Mann personally comes to stake the location of the pond. They want to be exempt ifthere is an erosion problem from removing the rocks. The last issue is they want to be allowed to plant vegetation native to Minnesota and would like the list to come directly from City Engineer Mann. They will restore the area themselves. They do not want anyone to step on their property, seed it, touch it or harass them in any way. They will do the work themselves with their landscaper. They would like to have the entire buffer area off their property. Councilmember Pritzlaffurged the Berg's to check with the City regarding any setbacks before moving their pond. Mrs. Berg stated that is why City Engineer Mann is coming. Councilmember Pritzlaff replied he is probably not coming. It is your yard, you have surveyors that will sight where they property line is. Check with the City to make sure there are no setbacks from the neighbor's property to the pond. The Berg's agreed. Mrs. Berg stated she would like this issue to be wrapped up today. They are volunteering to move the pond and it is a very costly thing to do. She stated City Engineer Mann is coming. Mr. Berg stated the reason they are asking for him to come, is last summer when they put in the rock retaining wall and the fish pond they were in communication with the City and they knew where the pond was going. They found out afterwards it was in an area where it was not supposed to be. They want to make sure they do not have any confrontations again and want to make sure the conservation easement is marked correctly. Councilmember McKnight clarified that they are moving the pond and the landscaping that is past the proposed conservation easement line. Mrs. Berg stated the last 10 ft. from the property line. The Berg's pointed it out on the picture what would be removed. Mayor Soderberg reviewed Mrs. Berg's points. She asked for some documents regarding the wetland buffer issue and directed staff to forward those documents to Mrs. Berg. Regarding working with the landscaper, staffwill provide guidance and place markers where the conservation easement line is. Everything from that line towards the back of the property line would need to be restored to the wetland buffer. Whether City Engineer Mann places the stakes, or a building inspector, or a surveyor does not matter. Mrs. Berg stated her compromise is only dependent if Council Minutes (Regular) December 19,2005 Page 9 they work with City Engineer Mann. Mayor Soderberg stated the conservation easement will be marked. The property on the conservation easement side will be restored to natural vegetation and staffwill provide a list of what can be planted. With regard to the erosion problem, that will have to be addressed. City Engineer Mann stated with the rocks being removed, that presents an erosion problem. Council needs to direct who is responsible for dealing with the erosion. There will be an erosion issue until the site is graded back to what it needs to be and then stabilized. How this will work is dependent on discussions with the Berg's and their landscaper. The erosion, seeding and re-grading should all be part ofthe same operation. There is a specification that needs to be met for the seeds. Staff needs to receive the Conservation Easement document to make this official and for the City to be able to vacate the drainage and utility easement that is beyond the conservation easement. Mrs. Berg noted the Conservation Easement is already in process and they have paid the mortgage company. The minute the frost is out, the pond is moving to the other side. The landscaper will be moving the pond and the rocks at the same time. None of the City's dirt from the hump can go into their yard. Mrs. Berg does not want the four trees in the buffer touched when the grading is done. Mrs. Berg wanted to make it clear that they will remove the rocks, but does not want to hear one complaint about the erosion. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated when the rocks are removed, the grasses will take care of the erosion. City Engineer Mann replied they will have to establish that with seeding and blanketing. Staffwill review the grading plan to determine what was there. Mrs. Berg asked who will have to establish that because she is not encroaching on City property. The Berg's wanted to make sure it is not them. Mayor Soderberg stated you have encroached on City property and if you remove the rocks, the wetland buffer will need to be restored by you. Mrs. Berg replied no, she does not want to touch anything that has to do with the City. Mayor Soderberg stated the Berg's will need to restore the wetland buffer and the portion where they have encroached on City property. Mrs. Berg refused to take her seat and Mayor Soderberg called for a recess at 9:21 p.m. The Council meeting resumed at 9:32 p.m. Mayor Soderberg stated regarding the property at 5241 203rd Street, the conservation easement line will be delineated so the Berg's understand where it is. A list of vegetation will be provided along with a specification for the seeding. As far as locating the pond, the pond needs to be located inside the conservation easement and needs to meet any setbacks. Staff will work closely with the landscaper to define these areas so everything works together to restore the area. Councilmember Pritzlaff clarified there will be no cost to the City and Mayor Soderberg confirmed this. Mr. Berg stated he does not know what the cost of the re-grading will be, but hoped the City will be reasonable if the cost is excessive and help them out. City Engineer Mann stated we will be able to determine what was there before and would not recommend to Council that the Berg's pay for any restoration over and above what was there before. If there are further improvements that might be beneficial that will be brought back to Council and the Council can determine whether to go ahead with that. MOTION by Soderberg, second Pritzlaff, to direct staffto work with the Council Minutes (Regular) December 19,2005 Page 10 Berg's in restoring the wetland buffer back to the conservation easement line pending the Conservation Easement agreement, provide a list of natural vegetation and specifications for seed, delineating specifically where the conservation easement line is, and assist with solving any erosion problems on City property. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Adopt 2006-2010 CIP - Finance The CIP will include a schedule which outlines City projects, public works projects and parks projects for 2006-2010. This was discussed at a workshop on October 26,2005. All the 2006 projects have been included in the budget. 2006 projects include the First Street garage storage facility, the annual seal coat project, well no. 8 and the pump house, sidewalk and curb replacement program, annual mill and overlay project, Spruce Street bridge and utility street extension, 208th Street and utility extension from where it ends in the Industrial Park westerly to CSAH 31, Hill Dee area street reconstruction, 195th Street east construction from the current terminus to hwy 3, bike trail around the southeast area trunk facility, and the Fair Hills pond bank stabilization project. The public works projects total $20 million. The majority of the cost will be charged to developers or land owners based on City policy. The Spruce Street project has $1 million in grant funding to help pay for the bridge with the balance of the project being assessed back to the Spruce Street area with an agreement for an abatement which the developer will be requesting at the time of construction of the project. The 195th Street project will be brought to Council in early 2006 as to how this project will be funded between the County, the developer, and the City as part of their development agreement. The project might be split into a two-phase project, part in 2006 and part in 2007. Park projects will be done on Silver Springs Park, Vermillion Grove Park, Mystic Meadows Park, the Seed-Genstar Park, Evergreen Knoll Park, Depot Way Arts Park, and planning on Dakota County Estates, Daisy Knoll, and Westview Park. Park projects for 2006 total $548,000 and would be funded by developer contributions as part oftheir requirements in the development contracts and excess funding out of the park improvement fund. Mayor Soderberg noted on the Consent Agenda was the approval of the annexation for the Newland property which will facilitate the 195th Street extension. MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaffto approve the 2006-2010 Capital Improvement Plan. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Discussion of Citywide Broadband Connectivity - Information Technology There has been interest from residents and Council to explore broadband connectivity. City representatives attended a conference that focused on this technology and the costs. This can be a powerful economic and residential Council Minutes (Regular) December 19,2005 Page 11 development tool. The City has recently installed a fiber optic network which is the base needed to provide this technology to every home and business to be able to meet telephone, internet and video demands for the future. The cost will vary depending on the services and capital expenditures. Council agreed for staff to research the options and place it on the City survey. Staffwill bring an RFP to Council in January to do a Citywide survey and would like to include questions regarding fiber optics providers of the services whether it be City run or a combination of a public/private partnership. Staff will bring back some education pieces to outline the City's options and how a couple other cities are doing this, such as St. Louis Park and Chaska. There should be a workshop in 2006 to discuss the options and how to move forward. Council reached a consensus for this item. c) Management Assessment City Administrator Candidates - Human Resources Staffhas contacted PDI and Martin-McAllister for conducting management assessments on the City Administrator candidates. PDI would charge $2500 for two candidates and Martin-McAllister would charge $2000 for two candidates. Mayor Soderberg noted one candidate has withdrawn so this would be for Peter Herlofsky and Jeff O'Neill. Each company uses different assessment tools but both would provide the information Council is looking for. Councilmember McKnight was prepared to focus on one candidate. Mayor Soderberg noted this would save some funds as there was one candidate that received all five votes of the Council. He would be in favor of doing the assessment on one candidate. Councilmember McKnight was to the point of working on an employment agreement depending on the background check and the psychological check. He was ready to move forward with this candidate. Staff clarified that staff should continue with the background check and the management assessment on the candidate identified by all five Councilmembers. Subject to the background and management assessment being brought back to Council, at that time dependent on the results Council would want to go forward with an offer to that individual. At this time there will be a background check and management assessment on one candidate. Councilmember Fogarty added and a contingent job offer. Staff noted City Attorney Jamnik recommended Council wait to make the contingent offer until Council has the background and management assessment in hand. The preliminary verbal report could be ready by the end of the week for the background. A complete background would take longer. Martin-McAllister has indicated they would be able to provide this between Christmas and New Year's and the results would be available in a few days. Acting City Attorney Knetsch also recommended getting the results of the background and assessment first and then provide a job offer. Mayor Soderberg recommended having Martin- McAllister do the management assessment for Mr. Peter Herlofsky and provide this information to Council for the first meeting in January. MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto approve the hiring of Martin-McAllister to perform a management assessment on City Administrator candidate, Mr. Peter Herlofsky. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Council Minutes (Regular) December 19,2005 Page 12 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Councilmember Wilson: He attended the Toys for Town preparation and sent tremendous kudos to the high school and all the students. It was neat to watch Police Chief Siebenaler who was glowing because of the success. Councilmember Pritzlaft: Also attended Toys for Town and it was fun. He thanked everyone from the school district and those who gave to the program, and Police Chief Siebenaler for being in charge of the program. The new park and ride opened on December 5,2005 north of 160th Street and Pilot Knob Road. Direct express service to bypass Apple Valley will be available in 2006. He went out on a plow truck to see the operation. He received an e-mail from a resident regarding sidewalks that are not being cleaned in a timely manner. City Engineer Mann will verify the situation and there are ordinances stipulating a deadline for having sidewalks shoveled. If not done, the City does it and bills the resident. Acting City Administrator/Finance Director Roland: Reminded Council the Farmington Chamber luncheon takes place on Wednesday. The Farmington High School choir will be singing. Police Chief Siebenaler: Toys for Town served 168 children in 70 families. Additional gifts were donated to another non-profit that serves families with parents in rehab, more given to the Community Action Council food shelf program what will be used for birthday presents. A truckload will be donated to the B. Robert Lewis House. There were 50 volunteers and he thanked everyone who came. Parks and Recreation Director Distad: We have outdoor ice and the warming houses are open. The holiday decorations are up on the Maintenance Facility. City Engineer Mann: There were two water main breaks on Elm Street this week, one by the dentist office and one by the parks garage. Mayor Soderberg: Last week Farmington hosted the Mayors/Managers meeting in Eagan and thanked Acting City Administrator Roland for providing the refreshments and Police Chief Siebenaler for addressing the audience and sharing information on Toys for Town. After that meeting there was a meeting of the Board of Directors for the Dakota Communications Center and a profile for the Administrator for this program was reviewed. The Brimeyer Group will be conducting the search. He attended Toys for Town and was surprised by the number of kids there wrapping Council Minutes (Regular) December 19,2005 Page 13 presents. What a great heritage to pass on to children. We ended up with truckloads of gifts to pass on. 14. ADJOURN MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to adjourn at 10: 15 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, 4r.~./Y7c~ // (~// Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 76 TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City Administrator FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Annual Report - Boards and Commissions DATE: January 3,2006 INTRODUCTION Section IX of Council By-laws calls for the submittal of a report stating the number of meetings and the attendance records for various Board and Commission members. DISCUSSION The 2005 attendance record for all seats on City Boards and Commissions is as follows: HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION Beverly Preece Present 4 out of 4 meetings Tim Burke Present 4 out of 4 meetings Edgar Samuelson Present 4 out of 4 meetings Jonathan Robertson Present 1 out of2 meetings (Resigned September, 2005) Danielle Stuckle Present 2 out of2 meetings (Appointed July, 2005) HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Christy Jo Fogarty Present 10 out of 12 meetings Yvonne Flaherty Present 10 out of 12 meetings Todd Arey Present 12 out of 12 meetings Paul Hardt Present 12 out of 12 meetings Erik Starkman Present 11 out of 12 meetings PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION Randy Oswald Present 14 out of 14 meetings Dawn Johnson Present 13 out of 14 meetings Paula Higgins Present 10 out of 14 meetings Robin Hansen Present 12 out of 14 meetings Karen Neal Present 12 out of 14 meetings Mike Buringa Present January meeting only ,.... .. PLANNING COMMISSION Dirk Rotty Present 15 out of 15 meetings Chaz Johnson Present 10 out of 15 meetings Ben Barker Present 12 out of 15 meetings Todd Larson Present 14 out of 15 meetings Sherry Richter Present 10 out of 15 meetings WATER BOARD Robert Shirley Jeff Krueger Tom Jensen Present 6 out of 11 meetings Present 10 out of 11 meetings Present 11 out of 11 meetings RAMBLING RIVER CENTER ADVISORY BOARD Charlie Weber Present 11 out of 12 meetings Edgar Samuelson Present 7 out of 12 meetings Ruth Reisinger Present 9 out of 12 meetings Betty Steege Present 12 out of 12 meetings Sarah Miller Present 11 out of 12 meetings Beverly Preece Present 10 out of 12 meetings Nancy Anderson Present 10 out of 12 meetings ACTION REQUESTED For Council information only. Respectfully submitted, ~ dl-~. Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director Cc: Board and Commission members 7e City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor and Councilmembe~ Acting City Administrator~ Daniel M. Siebenaler, Police Chief TO: SUBJECT: Resolution accepting donation of X-26 Taser to Police Department DATE: January 3,2006 INTRODUCTION As part of the proposed 2006 budget the Farmington Police Department has proposed the purchase of Tasers for deployment with its Patrol Division. Tasers, more commonly referred to as stun guns are now standard issue for patrol officers in over 7,000 police departments around the world and are standard issue in over 1,700 departments. They have been in police service since 1998 and are proven to reduce injury to both police officers and suspects. DISCUSSION On November 4th 2005 four off-duty members of the Farmington Police Department had the opportunity to participate in a large scale study of "The Effect of Tasers on the Human Heart" conducted under medical supervision at the Hennepin County Medical Center. The purpose of the test was to record, via sonogram, the heart activity of a subject while being Tased. Four participants from Farmington were each subjected to a ten second exposure to 50,000 volts of electricity from a standard X-26 Taser. It should be noted that the normal exposure time in field use would be 5 seconds. In return for participation each test subject was compensated with an X-26 Taser, Holster and refill package valued at $1,000. The Police Department has updated its Use of Force Policy to include the use of Tasers in the deployment of Less than Lethal Force. In addition all officers have been trained in the use of this less lethal option. Officer Shawn Scovill was one of the four test subjects from Farmington. As a member of the Patrol Division he has chosen to donate his Taser to the Farmington Police Department for general deployment with the Patrol Division. tv-,. \ ; ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the proposed Resolution accepting the donation of an X-26 Taser to the Farmington Police Department. Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police RESOLUTION NO. R -06 ACCEPT DONATION OF A TASER FROM OFFICER SHAWN SCOVILL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 3rd day of January, 2006 at 7:00 p.rn. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, It is in the best interest of the City of Farmington and the Farmington Police Department to use minimal force in the enforcement of the law, And WHEREAS, Promoting the use of Less than Lethal technology in the Police Department whenever possible is a means of accomplishing minimal use of force, And WHEREAS, Use of Less than Lethal technology is important in preserving public safety and minimizing injury, And WHEREAS, The Farmington Police Department has proposed the addition of Tasers to it's inventory of Less than Lethal technology in 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby accepts the donation of one X26 Taser valued at $1,000 from Officer Shawn Scovill for use by the Farmington Police Department as part of its Less than Lethal arsenal. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 3rd day of January 2006. Mayor Attested to the _day of 2006. SEAL Acting City Administrator 7d City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City Administrator~ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer TO: SUBJECT: Approve Assessment Agreement - Ash Street Project DATE: January 3,2006 INTRODUCTION Beverly P. Morell, l124 Highland Circle, has petitioned for connection to the recently installed sanitary sewer and water on Highland Circle. DISCUSSION Beverly P. Morell, the owner of 1124 Highland Circle, has requested that the connection fees for the sewer and water be assessed. Allowing the connection fees to be assessed is consistent with the City's practice of working with property owners that have annexed into the City. The proposed assessment agreement is attached. BUDGET IMPACT The amount that would be assessed for 1124 Highland Circle is $3,180.00. This amount will be assessed against the property over a ten year period accruing interest at the rate of five percent per annum. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the Assessment Agreements between the City of Farmington and Beverly P. Morell, the owner of the property at ll24 Highland Circle. Respectfully submitted, ~m~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT (Parcel ill 076324005000) THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made this day of 2005, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") with offices at 325 Oak Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024, and Beverly P. Morell, whose address is 1124 Highland Circle, Farmington, Minnesota 55024 ("Owner"). Recitals: A. The Owner owns the real property located in Dakota County legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated .herein ("Subject Property"), also referred to as Parcel Identification number 076324005000; and B. The Subject Property shall be assessed costs, fees and charges associated with the sanitary sewer and water service connection to the Subject Property. The service connections of sanitary sewer and water benefit the Subject Property; and C. The actual costs, fees and charges to be assessed against the Subje~t Property ("Assessments") are set forth on Exhibit "B". NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Subject Property is hereby assessed by the City for the Assessments. The total Assessments are: $3,180.00. The foregoing amount shall be assessed against the Subject Property over a ten (10) year period accruing interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum. The Assessments shall not exceed the amounts set forth on Exhibit "B". 2. The Assessments shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The Owner, by signing this Agreement, acknowledge that all procedural and 1 substantive objections to the Assessment are hereby waived unconditionally, such waiver includes any rights of Owners, their successors or assigns to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the Subject Property. The Owners further waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. ~ 429.081. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Kevan Soderberg, Mayor By: Robin Roland, Interim City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) ~ ",n ~ ~ T~e. foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ 1M" day of ~Y\t).lIv ,2005, by Kevan Soderberg and Robin Roland, the Mayor and Interim City Administrator ofthe City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. .~~"",-~~_-~"'-....--"'~JI'.l---"'. I ... VICTORIA LE1GH TRONGARD I NOTARY PUBUC. MINNESOTA . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1-31-2010 ~~~ Notary Public . rvo-fTlnW(. f)e~'Vtlb f l-\<<cllJ ~~\t ~ 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2005, by and Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan,MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/cjh 3 EXHIBIT "A" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Subject Property: Lot 5, Block 1, REINARDY ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota 4 EXHIBIT "B" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT Ash Street Utility and Reconstruction Project Sewer and Water Utility Connection fees (Not including lateral benefit costs) Sewer Metro Sewer Availability Charge $ 1,450.00 City Sewer Availability Charge $ 410.00 Total Sewer $ 1,860.00 Water Reserve Capacity Connection 0N AC) $ 720.00 Water Treatment Plant Fee $ 600.00 Total Water $ 1,320.00 Total Both $ 3,180.00 5 /e City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City Administrator ~ Tim Gross, P.E., Assistant City Engineer TO: SUBJECT: Approve Change Order #2 - Fire Station No.2 DATE: January 3,2006 INTRODUCTION Forwarded herewith for Council's review and consideration is Change Order #2 for the Fire Station No.2 Project. DISCUSSION Change Order #2 provides for additional Bid Items for Payment for work completed by the Contractor. Specific descriptions for each change order item are listed on the attached memo from the architect. BUDGET IMPACT The total cost for the change order is $9,342. This amount is within the project budget. ACTION REQUESTED Approve by motion, Change Order #2 for the Fire Station No.2 project in the amount of $9,342. R~d, Tim Gross, P .E. Assistant City Engineer cc: Lee Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer John McNamara, Wold Architects and Engineers file WOLD ST. PAUL, MN ELGIN, IL TROY, MI DENVER, CO FROM: DATE: COMM. NO: M E M 0 RAN 0 U M TO: Tim Gross MINNESOTA OFFICE 305 ST. PETER STREET ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 651.227.7773 FAX 651.223.5646 WWW.WOLDAE.COM MAIL@WOLDAE.COM John McNamarar December 20, 2005 042170 SUBJECT: Farmington Fire Station No.2 The following are recommended contract changes for Fire Station No.2 at the North Municipal Campus. The approved costs have been reviewed and represent a fair value for the work performed. Item Description Approved Cost PR #5 The fire department requested changing the $190 dryer for cleaning turn-out gear from electric to gas. PR #8 At the request of Parks and Recreation, we $7,569 requested pricing to change the irrigation water connection from the Central Maintenance Facility to stand alone at the Fire Station. This allows for better tracking of water and irrigation use. PR #11 The fire department requested a simplified <$2,002> tanker fill connection resulting in a credit to the project. Misc. Cost #26 The specified plate at the garage openings $3,745 needed to be changed to a larger size. Misc. Cost #30 In order to expedite the window delivery at for <$4,500> the contractor, a change to the window fabrication was approved resulting in a credit to the proj ect. Total Change Order #2 $9,342 Upon approval by City Council, we will issue Change Order #2 for the project. If you have any questions, please call. cc: Robin Roland, City of Farmington Michael Cox, Wold Aimee LaLone, Wold SM/CIJarmington/042170/dec05 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us l~ TO: Mayor, Councilmembers Acting City Administrator ~ FROM: Ken Kuchera, Fire Chief SUBJECT: School and Conference - Fire Department DATE: January 3,2006 INTRODUCTION The Fire Department is planning attendance at the 26th Annual Arrowhead EMS Conference. DISCUSSION Mr. Terry Verch will be attending the above conference January 21-22,2006 in Duluth. Topics covered include a WMD Awareness class and a NIMS bridge course. This is an annual event held by the Arrowhead EMS Association. This conference is one of many offered that provides current updates and techniques. BUDGET IMPACT The cost of the course is $327.00 and is approved in the 2006 budget. ACTION REQUESTED Approve attendance at the 26th Annual Arrowhead EMS Conference. Respectfully submitted, ~.~ /~~~ ~ Ken Kuchera Fire Chief ~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and Interim City Administrator ~ Randy Distad, Parks & Recreation Director FROM: SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for a Truck Chassis with Automated Refuse Collection Body DATE: January 3, 2006 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting Council approval for the specifications and advertisement for bids for the 2006 budgeted truck chassis with automated refuse collection body for the Solid Waste Division. DISCUSSION Staff has prepared specifications for the purchase of a truck chassis with automated refuse collection body. BUDGET IMPACT The 2006 budget includes $209,025 for the truck chassis and automated refuse collection body. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution approving the specifications and ordering the advertisement for bids. Respectfully submitted, 4IJJ# lan~tad Parks & Recreation Director cc: file Benno Klotz RESOLUTION NO. R -06 APPROVE SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS SOLID WASTE - TRUCK CHASSIS with FULLY AUTOMATED REFUSE COLLECTION BODY Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 3rd day of January, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution. WHEREAS, specifications have been prepared for the following proposed equipment: Truck Chassis with Fully Automated Refuse Collection Body ;and, WHEREAS, such plans and specifications are now before the Council for its consideration; and, WHEREAS, funding for the truck with Fully Automated Refuse Collection Body has been approved in the 2006 Budget. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. Said specifications are hereby approved. 2. The Parks and Recreation Director is authorized to insert in the Farmington Independent and Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for such equipment and that bids shall be received by the City unti12:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 2,2006 at which time they shall be publicly opened and read aloud. They will then be considered by the City Council. No bid shall be considered unless accompanied by a bid bond, certified check or cash deposit equal to at least five percent (5%) of the amount ofthe bid. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 3rd day of January, 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of , 2006. SEAL Interim City Administrator 7h City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and Interim City Administrator~ Randy Distad, Parks & Recreation Director FROM: SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for a new Ice Resurfacer for the Schmitz-Maki Arena DATE: January 3, 2006 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting Council approval for the specifications and advertisement for bids for the 2006 budgeted ice resurfacer for the Schmitz- Maki Arena. DISCUSSION Staff has prepared specifications for the purchase of an ice resurfacer. The specifications are for an Olympia resurfacer, which is the same brand of ice resurfacer that the City has owned in the past. BUDGET IMPACT The approved 2006 Arena capital budget includes $82,681 for a new ice resurfacer. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution approving the specifications and ordering the advertisement for bids. Respectfully submitted, ~~ j):#J Randy DIstad Parks & Recreation Director cc: file Dwight Bjerke RESOLUTION NO. R -06 APPROVE SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ARENAICERESURFACER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 3rd day of January, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution. WHEREAS, specifications have been prepared for a new ice resurfacer for the Schmitz-Maki Arena; and, WHEREAS, such plans and specifications are now before the Council for its consideration; and, WHEREAS, funding for the ice resurfacer has been identified and approved in the 2006 Capital Outlay Budget. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: l. Said specifications are hereby approved. 2. The Parks and Recreation Director is authorized to insert in the Farmington Independent and Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for such equipment and that bids shall be received by the City until 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 26, 2006 at which time they shall be publicly opened and read aloud. They will then be considered by the City Council. No bid shall be considered unless accompanied by a bid bond, certified check or cash deposit equal to at least five percent (5%) of the amount ofthe bid. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 3rd day of January, 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of ,2006. SEAL Interim City Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7,' TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and Interim City Administrator~ Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: SUBJECT: Equipment Capital Outlay DATE: January 3, 2006 INTRODUCTION The City's approved 2006 Capital Outlay Budget identified funding for a new mounted sweepster broom. DISCUSSION Staffhas solicited quotes from two vendors for a new sweepster broom. The broom will be mounted to a l445 John Deere mower. The broom will be used to sweep snow off of trails and sidewalks. It will also be used to sweep shavings off of the outdoor ice rinks. During other times of the year it will be used to sweep sand and debris off of trails, sidewalks and other hard surfaces. Polfus Equipment in Rosemount, Minnesota submitted the low quote in the amount of $3,700. The approved budgeted amount for this piece of equipment was $3,675. This quote is $25 higher than the budgeted amount. It will take approximately 3 weeks for the sweepster broom to be delivered to the City. Purchasing it now will mean that it can be used this winter for snow removal. BUDGET IMPACT The 2006 Capital Outlay Budget included funding in the amount of $3,675 for a sweepster broom. The cost is $25 over the budgeted amount. ACTION REQUESTED This item is for informational purposes only. ~mJlY 1:;;; J::D~, Parks and Recreation Director cc: Don Hayes 7~ ~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Stree, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, City Councilmembers and Interim City Administratof Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Regarding Existing and Proposed Park, Trail and Open Space Plan Map DATE: January 3,2006 INTRODUCTION The City of Farmington amended its Comprehensive Plan twice in 2004 in order to update its Existing and Proposed Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan Map (Plan Map). The updates were approved by the City Council so that the location of future parks, trails and open space were identified in future developments. DISCUSSION The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) at its September 2005 meeting reviewed the existing Plan Map to determine whether or not it needed to be amended to address trail locations in a development that was being proposed by Bridgeland Development (the Developer) on land known as the Perkins property. At that time the Plan Map did not show any future trails on this parcel. The PRAC felt that there should be trails shown on this property and voted unanimously to recommend to the Planning Commission and to the City Council that the Plan Map be amended to show trails on the Developer's property. The PRAC's Plan Map amendment recommendation was then brought forward to the Planning Commission for a public hearing. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at its December 13, 2005 meeting to receive comments on the proposed amendment to the Plan Map. No one spoke in opposition to the amendment during the public hearing. Attached are two exhibits. Exhibit A identifies the trail revisions on the larger Plan Map. Exhibit B, calls out better the location of the revisions being made to the trail locations on the Developer's property. ACTION REQUESTED By resolution approve the amendment identified for future trail locations on the Existing and Proposed Park, Trails and Open Space Plan Map as shown in Exhibit A and B. E. es ctfully S. ubmitted . ));# an~tad Parks and Recreation Director cc: Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Members RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTCONCERNING EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKS, TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN MAP Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting ofthe City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 3rd day of January, 2006 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: seconded the following: Member introduced and Member WHEREAS, due to a future development being proposed it is in the best interest of the City to amend the Existing and Proposed Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan Map (Plan Map) found in Chapter 11 Parks and Recreation of the Farmington 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update to show park and trail locations on this property; and, WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission is recommending approval of the amendment being made to the Plan Map; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at its December 13, 2005 meeting and is also recommending approval ofthe amendment being made to the Plan Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Farmington hereby amends the Existing and Proposed Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan Map in Chapter 11 Parks and Recreation ofthe Farmington 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 3rd day of January 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of January, 2005. Interim City Administrator SEAL ~il;i l;~ + A Existing and Proposed Park Trail, and Open Space Plan Map ,~ ~""~~'1'_~ . - Ill, -~~~ D~~~ - ~itiIl:J .~ . h oW;~ "1". €l;:~~;l,.'f.rI "i..... --- mw~ Created on April 9, 2004 Revised on June 10, 2004 Revised on September 10, 2004 Revised on November 4, 2005 EXHIBIT B N W+E S Created on April 9, 2004 Revised on June 10, 2004 Revised on September 10, 2004 Revised on November 4, 2005 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7/( TO: Mayor, Council Members FROM: Robin Roland, Acting City Administrator/Finance Director SUBJECT: LMCIT Excess Liability Coverage DATE: January 3, 2006 INTRODUCTION The City has historically purchased excess liability coverage as part of its insurance cov~rage. Accordingly, the City must decide annually whether or not to waive statutory liability limits to the extent ofthe excess coverage purchased. DISCUSSION The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) basic liability coverage provides limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence, but offers cities the option of additional liability coverage. As in recent years, the City has chosen under its insurance coverage for 2006 to accept excess liability coverage limits of $2,000,000 from the LMCIT. In accepting this excess liability coverage, the City protects itself from liability claims which are not covered by the statutory limits. The election not to waive the liability limits results in a 25% reduction of the City's premium for this excess coverage. ACTION REQUIRED The City Council should adopt a motion electing NOT TO WAIVE the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. 7?k2 Robin Roland Acting City Administrator/Finance Director 7L City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and Acting City Administrator r FROM: Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director SUBJECT: 2006 Community Development Block Grant Application DATE: January 3, 2006 INTRODUCTION The City has the right to apply for approximately $59,000 in Community Development Block Grant [CDBG] funds for CDBG Program Year 2006 [July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007]. To secure the grant money that is available, the City must prepare and submit an application that specifies eligible activities or projects to which the City intends to apply the available funding. The completed application must be submitted to the Dakota County Community Development Agency [CDA]. DISCUSSION For the last several years, the City has received [federal] Community Development Block Grant funds, which have been administered and distributed by the Dakota County Community Development Agency [CDA]. The next CDBG "program year" will run from July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. Last year's CDBG allocation amount was $65,500. The CDA has advised us that President Bush has proposed a federal budget that reflects a 10% reduction in the CDBG program. The CDA has therefore suggested that every city reduce last year's allocation by 10%, with the understanding that upward adjustments can be made later if the final amount of the reduction is less than the amount proposed by the President. Reducing last year's CDBG allocation of $65,500 by 10% results in $58, 950, which I've rounded to an even $59,000 for the time being. In order to obtain the available CDBG funds, the City must complete and submit an application, as it has done in past years. The application must identify the project(s) for which the CDBG funds will be used, and the specific project activities to which the funds will be applied. CDBG funds can only be used for "eligible" projects or activities that satisfy certain "National Objectives." Typically, such objectives include redeveloping slums or blighted areas, creating or improving housing that benefits individuals who fall within "low to moderate income" guidelines, or creating jobs that pay wages that fall within certain ranges. At this time last year, the City Council approved the HRA's recommendation that 50% ($32,750) of the City's 2005 CDBG allocation, plus certain unused funds ($70,792.06) from prior years' CDBG allocations be used for the acquisition of the "Riste Building," located at 209 Oak Street in downtown Farmington. That process has been moving steadily forward. A hazardous materials ["hazmat"] survey has been completed, and cost projections have been prepared regarding the hazmat abatement that will be required when the building is demolished. A survey of the property has been prepared, and copies have been distributed to the City Attorney, Dakota County Abstract and the property's current owner, Mr. Hosmer Brown. Those parties currently have discussions in progress regarding a few boundary line and title issues that need to be addressed before a closing date can be set. At the Farmington HRA meeting that was held on December 13, the HRA Board discussed the 2006 CDBG allocation. At the conclusion of that discussion, the HRA recommended to the City Council that the 2006 CDBG funds be applied to the two remaining "post-acquisition" costs associated with the Riste Building: hazmat abatement and demolition. It is possible that the 2006 CDBG funds (approximately $59,000) will not be sufficient to cover the combined total of the hazmat abatement and demolition costs, in which case the HRA's plan will be to negotiate an arrangement with the eventual developer of the property whereby the developer will either (a) pay a portion of those costs when they are incurred or (b) reimburse the HRA for a portion of those costs after they have been paid by the HRA. Conversely, if the combined total of the hazmat abatement and demolition is less than $59,000, the HRA can then re-allocate the difference to another project. You may recall that when this topic was discussed at the November 7 City Council meeting, it was mentioned that the preliminary staff recommendation to the HRA was probably going to be that only 50% of the 2006 CDBG funds be allocated to the Riste Building. This was based on the fact that the federal government is getting increasingly insistent that CDBG funds be spent in ways that result in clear benefits to low-to-moderate income ["low-mod"] individuals. The federal government apparently believes that too much CDBG money is being allocated to "slum and blight" projects, which (in their eyes) has only indirect benefits (at best) to low-mod individuals. In response to this concern, the Dakota County CDA has been asking that cities not spend more than 50% of their CDBG funds on "slum and blight" projects unless that project will also meet the federal government's low-mod criteria. Every course of action has advantages and disadvantages. In the case of the Riste Building, the advantage of using 100% (rather than 50%) of the 2006 CDBG allocation for hazmat and demolition costs is the fact that we will probably be able to get the building demolished sooner, and we'll have more options available to us with regard to the structuring of an acceptable financial arrangement with the eventual developer. The disadvantage of using 100% of the 2006 CDBG funds for hazmat and demolition costs is the fact that we will have to fashion a contractual arrangement with the developer whereby a certain proportion of any newly-created housing units (this assumes that the goal is still to construct a two-story mixed use building on the site) are reserved for individuals who satisfy certain federal low-mod income guidelines. In addition, if the redevelopment of the site results in the creation of ground floor retail or commercial space (which is our expectation and objective), a certain proportion of any newly-created jobs will have to be made available to individuals who satisfy the same federal low-mod income guidelines. With the CDA's assistance, we believe that these requirements can be explained to prospective developers, and that there are developers who will not consider them to be unduly burdensome. In short, we believe that the advantages of using 100% of the 2006 CDBG funds for the Riste Building project outweigh whatever challenges the federal requirements may present. I have attached a proposed Resolution that has been prepared in the format required by the Dakota County CDA. If the Resolution is approved by the Council, an application that is consistent with the terms of the Resolution will be completed, attached to the Resolution and submitted to the Dakota County CDA. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the attached Resolution regarding the City's application for Program Year 2006 Community Development Block Grant funding and approving the allocation of 100% of said funds to hazmat abatement costs and/or demolition costs associated with the redevelopment of the Riste building site, located at 209 Oak Street in Farmington. RESOLUTION NO. R -06 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING WHEREAS, the City of Farmington is a participating jurisdiction with the Dakota County CDBG Entitlement Program for Fiscal Year 2006 (ending June 30, 2007); and WHEREAS, the Dakota County CDA is a Subgrantee of Dakota County for the administration of the CDBG Program; and WHEREAS, the Dakota County CDA has requested FY06 CDBG applications to be submitted based on a district formula allocation of funds approved in the 1984 Community Development Implementation Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby approves the following: 1. City staff are authorized to prepare, execute and file with the Dakota County CDA a FY06 CDBG application that is consistent with the direction provided by the City Council at its meeting on January 3, 2006. 2. The Dakota County CDA is designated as the administrative entity to carry out the CDBG program on behalf of the City of Farmington, subject to future Subrecipient Agreements that may be required for specific CDBG-funded activities. This resolution was adopted by vote of the City of Farmington on the 3rd day of January, 2006. Kevan Soderberg, Mayor day of January, 2006. Attested the Robin Roland, Acting City Administrator SEAL g"q.. ... ~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Councilmembers ~ and Acting City Administrator ~ Daniel M. Siebenaler, Chief of Police FROM: SUBJECT: Liquor Law Violations Public Hearings for the Suspension of Liquor License DATE: January 3,2006 INTRODUCTION As part of its liquor licensing authority the City of Farmington conducts periodic compliance checks on all licensed liquor retailers in the city. During a recent compliance check five licensed liquor retailers in Farmington sold alcoholic beverages to an underage adult. In each case the seller has been charged with the violation. Staff is recommending additional sanctions against the license holders. DISCUSSION In late November and early December 2005 the Farmington Police Department conducted compliance checks at all licensed liquor retailers in the city. One of two 19-year-old buyers, working under the direct supervision of a police officer entered each business and attempted the purchase of an alcoholic beverage. They were given strict instruction to openly identify themselves if asked to do so and not to conceal their age in any way. If asked for identification they were instructed to provide their actual Minnesota Driver's License. Staffhas included copies of the incident reports as well as a driver's license photo of the youthful buyers for Council review. In each case the sale was observed by a police officer. The youthful buyer set the alcohol down and the Police Officer immediately informed the sellers that they had just sold to an underage person. The actual sellers have been charged criminally with the violation. Under Minnesota Statutes and Farmington Ordinance (3-12-13.1) the Council has a right to impose penalties for violation of liquor laws. It is important for the City to send a clear message of owner accountability and zero tolerance for these violations. Per Farmington Ordinance 3-12-13.1 "The council has a right to suspend or revoke any license for the sale of intoxicating liquor" for any such violation. In instances where similar violations have occurred in other cities penalties have ranged from escalating civil fines to civil fines plus escalating .., ~:; .t ",0\ :t license suspensions. Since the inception of compliance checks in the City of Farmington the city has imposed a civil penalty on violators and increasingly more severe penalties on those licensees with multiple violations. Of the five violations in 2005, four of the owners were first time violators and one has had multiple consecutive prior violations. Pursuant to recent Council actions staff is recommending civil penalties of $250.00 and a 3 day suspension for each of the first time violations. In the case of the licensee with multiple violations staff is recommending a more severe penalty including a 7 day suspension and a fine of $500.00. These penalties have been discussed with the City Attorney and we believe the penalties are both reasonable and sustainable. The City Attorney has prepared and delivered a Hearing Notice for each of the violators including a description of the offense and the recommended penalties and the date of this Public Hearing. Each license holder has been advised of their right to attend this Public Hearing and to be represented by an attorney. ACTION REQUESTED Staff is recommending that all five Public Hearings be opened simultaneously and that each be heard consecutively as listed. Staff is recommending civil penalties of $250.00 and a 3 day suspension for each of the first time violations. These would include; The VFW Club; The Ugly Mug; Oasis Market and New Moon Buffet. In the case of the licensee with multiple violations, B&B Pizza, staff is recommending a more severe penalty including a 7 day suspension and a fine of $500.00. In all five cases staff is recommending that the licensee provide approved Server Training to all staff within 30 days. These penalties have been discussed with the City Attorney and we believe the penalties are both reasonable and sustainable. Council should note that staff recommendations are not binding and Council has the right to depart from them to be either more lenient or more severe depending on results of this public hearing. Daniel M. Siebenaler Police Chief Printed by: fasp4704 Printed date/time: 12/12/05 16:43 Incident Report Page 6 of 8 FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 19500 MUNICIPAL DRIVE FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55024 (651) 463-3333 Incident Number: FAOS-00001728 Narratives Entered DatelTime: Subject: 11/28/200516:54 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE CHECKlB&B PIZZA Narrative Type: Author: SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT DIRKS, BREANNA On 11/22/2005 at 2136 hours I was completing my alcohol compliance checks at the businesses in Farmington. I responded to the B&B Pizza and entered the restaurant and went to the front counter waiting area. Shortly thereafter my buyer, CBJ entered the restaurant and went directly to the bar. CBJ sat at the bar for 7 minutes when another customer at the bar yelled to an employee stating that there was someone waiting at the bar. The employee went to the bar and asked CBJ what he would like to drink. CBJ said he would like a Miller Lite bottle. The female employee gave CBJ a Miller Lite bottle and paid for it. I observed the transaction take place. I approached the counter where the employee came to speak with me and I identified myself as a police officer with the Farmington Police Department and informed her that she had just sold to an underage person. She provided me with her driver's license which identified her as a Kristina Marie Lindman with a date of birth of' .. . 12/06/1984. Her address is 14995 Fischer Ave., Hastings, MN 55033. I asked Lindman if she had carded'1he'~'"""_w, male and she said she had not. I asked her if she had ever received any training provided by her employer regarding carding customers and she said she had and had gone to a class. Lindman advised her manager on duty what had taken place. I asked Lindman if she normally carded people and she said she did. I asked her why she did not card this time and she said she was busy and should have carded but didn't. [., "If Entered DatelTime: Subject: 11/29/2005 09:49 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE CHECKNFW Narrative Type: SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Author: DIRKS, BREANNA On 11/22/2005 at 2215 hours I entered the VFW in Farmington to complete my alcohol compliance checks. I entered and sat at the bar. Shortly thereafter my buyer, CBJ entered and approached the bar on theopposite.....,. side of me where my view of him was very clear. The bartender walked over to CBJ and asked him what he would like to drink to which CBJ replied one Miller Lite bottle. The bartender asked for CBJ's identification to which CBJ provided him with. The bartender looked at t~~, ID for a few minutes and then handed CBJ the ID back and gave him his Miller Lite bottle. The transactionwas" completed which I observed. I responded to the bartender and identified myself as a police officer with the Farmington Police Department and that he had just sold to an underage person. Upon speaking with the bartender he provided me with his Texas driver's license which identified him as Wade Allen Fuller with a date of birth of 01/21/1978. He lives in Texas and said his court date information can be sent to him at the VFW. I asked Fuller if he knew that the buyer was under 21 and he said he did not. I asked him if he looked at the birth date and he said he did. He repeated the birthdate back to me, 1986 and I advised him that he was not 21. Fuller said he did his math wrong and thought he was 21 years of age. Printed by: fasp4704 Printed date/time: 12/1210516:43 Incident Report Page 7 of 8 FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 19500 MUNICIPAL DRIVE FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55024 (651) 463-3333 Incident Number: FAOS-00001728 Entered DatelTime: Subject: 11/29/200510:06 Narrative Type: SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE CHECK/OASIS MARKET Author: DIRKS, BREANNA On 11/22/2005 at 2250 hours I was completing my alcohol compliance checks at the Oasis Market. I responded to the outside of the Oasis Market. My buyer, CBJ went into the store and straight to the beer coo.l~r. I pulled my car next to the gas pump and looked through the glass where I had a clear view of my buyer. CBJ approached the counter to pay for the 6 pack of Miller Lite bottles he was going to purchase. "f There were no other customers in the store at this time and there was one clerk. CBJ approached the clerk arid the clerk left him for a minute to go get a price check on the bottles and came back. She completed the transaction with him without carding him. Johnson exited the store and walked to my vehicle with the 6 pack of Miller Lite bottles which was entered into evidence. I responded to the Oasis Market and went inside to speak with the clerk. I advised her that I was an officer with""'-'.w., the Farmington Police Department and she had just sold to someone underage. I requested her driver's license which she produced identifying her as Camella May Kearney with a date of birth of 05/06/1950. I asked her if she normally cards customers and she said yes and that she had been carding all night. Kearney stated that she has worked there for 12 years and this has never happened. I asked her why she didn't card and she said it had been a busy night and she should've carded but she didn't. Entered DatelTime: Subject: 121121200511:11 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE CHECK/UGLY MUG Narrative Type: Author: MAIN REPORT DIRKS, BREANNA On 12/08/2005 at 1730 hours myself along with my buyer, JMC entered the Ugly Mug to perform alcohol compliance checks. The buyer, JMC entered first and I followed. JMC went to the counter and I was in line behind her. She asked for a Miller Lite bottle. The store clerk, identified as Evea Marie Hermann with a date of birth of 08/17/1978 askecL,_c.....;--:;j._ JMC for her driver's license. JMC produced her driver's license and Hermann ultimately gave JMC her license' back and gave her a Miller Lite Bottle. JMC gave Hermann $2.50 for the beer. I witnessed this transaction. JMC walked to the front door of the restaurant. I approached Hermann and identified myself as a police Officer of with the Farmington Police Department and advised her that she sold to a minor. I asked Hermann ifshe knew that JMC was underage and she said she did not. Hermann said she looked at JMC's ID and thought that she. was younger than 21 years of age and looked back at the calendar that they had which stated needs to be born bY _ to be over 21 years of age. The year on that calendar was incorrectly displayed as 1986 as the year of birth a subject needs to be to legally purchase alcohol. 1986 is the year of birth of my buyer that is stated on her driver's license. I advised Hermann that she should advise her manager of what had occurred and they would be hearing something regarding their liquor license. I also advised her that she would be hearing from the City Attorney via mail regarding this incident. Printed by: fasp4704 Printed date/time: 12/12/0516:43 Incident Report PagE? 8 of 8 FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 19500 MUNICIPAL DRIVE FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55024 (651) 463-3333 Incident Number: FA05-00001728 Entered DatelTime: Subject: 12/12/200512:40 Narrative Type: MAIN REPORT ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE CHECK/NEW MOON BUFI Author: DIRKS, BREANNA On 12/08/2005 at 1735 hours I along with my buyer, JMC entered the New Moon Buffet. We were seated together at a table. Our server came by who was verbally identified as Su Qiong Zhou and a date of birth of 02/18/1956. Zhou asked us if we would like something to drink and JMC stated she would like a Miller Lite bottle. Zhou, who was a bit confused stated beer? JMC replied yes. I advised Zhou I was fine with water. ,_'.: '.J .~ I Zhou returned with JMC's Miller Lite bottle, handed it to her and advised us we could help ourselves to the buffet. It was at this point that we got out of the booth and approached the front counter to pay for the beer. JMC paid $2.00 for the Miller Lite bottle and exited the restaurant. I responded to Zhou and she advised me that she does not speak English. I talked with her son via the cell phon~ and explained to him what had occurred. He in turn explained to his mother what had happened. "'--,...,-,,, I asked Zhou for her driver's license which she provided. I advised Zhou as well as her son that she would be hearing about her liquor license from the City Attorney. I asked Zhou if she had any questions and she said she did not. Estab lishment Address Time Pass or Fail EI Tequila 953 8tn St. 1628 Pass Farmington BP 22280 Chippendale 1645 Pass Farmington 933 8tn St. 1627 Pass Billiards Ugly Mug 18450 Pilot Knob 1730 Fail Road New Moon Buffet 115 Elm St. 1755 Fail Eagles Club 200 3ra St. 1812 Pass Long Branch Saloon 309 3ra St. 1817 Pass .. B&B Pizza 216 Elm St. 2136 Fail . .. . VFW 421 3fO St. 2215 Fail .. , Oasis Market 207 8tn St. 2250 Fail Farmington Liquors 109 Elm St. 2150 Pass , Super America 18520 Pilot Knob 2313 Pass Road American Legion 10 8tn St. 2235 Pass Farmington Lanes 27 SID St. 2224 Pass Gossips 313 3ra St. 2205 Pass North Kwik Trip 18290 Pilot Knob 2319 Pass Road Econo Foods 115 Elm St. 2156 Pas~ North Farmington 18320 Pilot Knob 2120 Pass Liquor Road South K wik Trip 217 Elm St. 2245 Pass it ~ ..12 ... '<ll> J Lf- ) \ I J <!-~ IDa- City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ciJarmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, Acting City Administrator W FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Annual Organizational Matters DATE: January 3, 2006 INTRODUCTION State law requires that the City Council address annual organizational matters during its first regular meeting of the year to make certain designations and appointments. DISCUSSION The Council has traditionally taken this time to approve the following actions affecting either process or procedures. 10a(I). Acting Mayor - Council By-Laws provide that an Acting Mayor be appointed on a rotating basis in the absence of the Mayor. Councilmember Fogarty, subject to the 2nd most votes in the 2002 General Election and serving the fourth year of her term, is eligible for appointment as Acting Mayor. 10a(2). Official Publication - Per State law, the Farmington Independent is the only publication located within the City's corporate limits and as such qualifies as the City's legal newspaper. lOa(3). City Attorney - Joel Jamnik with the firm of Campbell Knutson respectfully requests reappointment as City Attorney for the year 2006. lOa(4). Consulting Engineers - The firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates (BRAA) has submitted information regarding services that are available to the City, along with 2006 Rate Schedules for both Private and Public Developments. BRAA has provided the City with exceptional service, value and expertise on a range of City projects. The appointment of BRAA as the City's consulting engineers under the new 2006 Rate Schedules and the appointment of Lee Mann as City Engineer and Director of Public Works are recommended. 10a(5). Official Depositories - Please refer to the attached memo from the Finance Director that identifies official City depositories for fiscal year 2006. 10a(6). Process Servers - The Farmington Police Department is the designated City Process Servers for 2006. 10a(7). City Clerk's Bond - State law requires the City Clerk be bonded. The City is covered by a $1,000,000 Faithful Performance bond, which is more than adequate to meet City needs. lOa(8). Fees and Charges - At the December 19, 2005 meeting, Council adopted Ordinance 005-546 establishing fees and charges for the year 2006. No further action is necessary. 10a(9). Boards and Commissions - Interviews will be held on Saturday, January 7,2006 at 8:00 a.m. for the purpose of selecting Commission candidates. 10a(10). Economic Development Authority - Councilmember Fogarty currently serves on this board. Council will need to appoint an additional Councilmember to serve on this board for the remainder oftheir council term. 1 Oa(11). ALF Ambulance Board Appointment Primary and Alternate - A primary and an alternate Councilmember will need to be appointed to the ALF Board for 2006. Councilmember Wilson currently serves as the primary representative and Councilmember McKnight serves as alternate on this board. lOa(12). Castle Rock, Empire, Eureka, Farmington (CEEF) Appointment - Appoint a Councilmember to serve as representative on this multi-jurisdictional board in 2006. Mayor Soderberg currently serves on this board. 10a(13). Joint FarmingtonlEmpire Planning Advisory Committee Appointments - Appoint and/or acknowledge a Councilmember, a staff member and at-large member (Planning Commission representative) to this board. In 2005, Councilmember Fogarty, the Community Development Director, Kevin Carroll and Todd Larson, Planning Commission member, served on this committee. 10a(14). MUSA Review Committee Appointments - Appoint two councilmembers to serve on this board in 2006. Councilmembers Fogarty and Pritzlaff currently serve on this board. lOa(15). Farmington/Castle Rock Discussion Group - Appoint a council member to serve as representative for this group in 2006. Councilmember McKnight currently serves on this board. 10a(16). Appointment of Director and Alternate to Logis - Appoint Robin Roland as Director and Brenda Wendlandt as Alternate to Logis for 2006. 10a(17). Responsible Authority for data practices appointment - Appoint, by resolution, Acting City Administrator, Robin Roland as responsible authority for data practices and Brenda Wendlandt as compliance officer for 2006. ACTION REOUIRED Approve the above actions as indicated on the attached form. Respectfully submitted, ~d-~C?d~~_ Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director COUNCIL MEETING ANNUAL ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS JANUARY 3, 2006 MOTION by , second by as follows: 10a(1). That Councilmember Fogarty be designated as Acting Mayor from January 4, 2006 through December 31, 2006. 10a(2). That the Farmington Independent be designated as the official publication from January 4, 2006 through December 31, 2006. 10a(3). Appoint the firm of Campbell Knutson, Joel Jamnik as City Attorney from January 4, 2006 through December 31, 2006. 10a(4). Appoint the firm of Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik as the City's Consulting Engineer for the year of 2006 and Lee Mann as City Engineer/Public Works Director. 10a(5). That the Anchor Bank of Farmington, League of Minnesota Cities 4M Fund, RBC Dain Rauscher, Wells Fargo Investments and Salomon Smith Barney be designated as the Official Depositories from January 4, 2006 through December 31, 2006. 10a(6). That all sworn personnel in the Farmington Police Department be designated as process servers for the calendar year 2006. 10a(7). Approve a $1,000,000 Faithful Performance bond for the City Clerk. Voting for: Motion Carried. Against: Abstain 10a(8). ORDINANCE NO. 005-546 Establishing Fees and Charges for licenses and permits for 2006 was adopted December 19,2005. 10a(9). Appointments to Boards and Commissions - Candidates will be interviewed January 7, 2006 and appointments will be made at the January 17, 2006 Council Meeting. 10a(10). MOTION by Councilmember for: Against: Motion Carried. , second by appointing to the Economic Development Authority. Voting Abstain: 10a(1l). MOTION by , second by , to appoint Councilmember as the primary and Councilmember as the alternate representative to the ALF Ambulance Board. Voting for: Against: Abstain: Motion Carried. 10a(12). MOTION by Councilmember Voting for: Motion Carried. , second by to appoint as the City's representative to the CEEF Committee. Against: Abstain: 10a(13). MOTION by designation of Larson, Planning Commission Committee. Voting for: Motion Carried. , second by acknowledging the Councilmember, Kevin Carroll, Staff member and Todd member on the Farmington/Empire Planning Advisory Against: Abstain: 10a(14). MOTION by Councilmembers Voting for: Motion Carried. , second by to appoint to the MUSA Review Committee. Abstain: and Against: 10a(15). MOTION by Councilmember Voting for: Motion Carried. , second by to appoint to the Farmington/Castle Rock Discussion Group. Against: Abstain: 10a(16). MOTION by , second by appointing Robin Roland as Director and Brenda Wendlandt as Alternate to LOGIS for 2006. Voting for: Against: Abstain: Motion Carried. 10a(17). MOTION by , second by appointing by resolution Robin Roland as the Responsible Authority for data practices and Brenda Wendlandt as Data Practices Act Compliance Officer for 2006. Voting for: Against: Abstain: Motion Carried. /Oct.,(;.) Ind~ei1dent 312 Oak Street, P.O. Box 192 Farmington, MN 55024 Tel: 65l-460-6606 Fax: 65l-463-7730 Email: gml@farmingtonindependent.com Farmington City Council 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Dear council members and staff at the City of Farmington, I am writing to request that the Farmington Independent be considered as the city's official newspaper. Our newspaper has been continually published in Farmington since April 1984, and we are still going strong. I have enclosed more information about our newspaper on the following pages, and I have included rate information for 2006. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,.., / ("." /i. 'v'-.-.. Chad Richardson General manager Farmington Independent Ind~aent To: The City of Farmington From: The Farmington Independent It is hereby affirmed: (a) The Farmington Independent newspaper is printed in the English language, is printed in newspaper format and in column and sheet form equiva- lent in printed space to at least 1,000 square inches. (b) The Farmington Independent is issued weekly, 52 weeks per year. (c) The Farmington Independent newspaper averages 45 percent of its printed space to paid advertising material and public notices. The balance of printed space is given to news of local interest, sports and com- munityevents. (d) The Farmington Independent newspaper has a paid circulation of 2,455. (e) The Farmington Independent newspaper is based at 312 Oak St. in Farmington, Minnesota. (f) A copy of each issue of the Farmington Independent newspaper is mailed directly to the state historical society. (g) The Farmington Independent newspaper is available to anyone who is a paid subscriber, or is distributed to them free of charge. (h) The Farmington Independent newspaper has complied with all the foregoing conditions for over one year immediately preceding date of notice of publica- tion. (i) The Farmington Independent newspaper publishes second-class statement of ownership and circulation, sworn to by the Farmington U.S. Post Office and a copy of same will be filed with the Secretary of State before Jan. 1 of each year. I dFARMINGI'O(I n epen ent 2006 legal printing rates The price per inch for printing legals in the Farmington Independent for 2006 will be $7. Legal copy in the Farmington Independent has the following dimensions: Column width in picas 11 Line length in picas 11 Number of lines per inch 10.5 Length of the lower case alphabet, in points 78 Type size, in points 6 Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Matthew K. Brokl" John F. Kelly Soren M. Mattick Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Marguerite M. McCarron Gina M. Brandt .. Also J.iccnscd in Wisconsin 1380 Corporate Center Curve Suite 317 . Eagan, MN 55121 651-452-5000 Fax 651-452-5550 www.ck-law.com /OQ;0 CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association ... Direct Dial: (651) 234-6219 E-mail Address:jjamnik@ck-Iaw.com TO: Farmington Mayor and City Council Robin Roland, Acting City Administrator DATE: December 28, 2005 RE: Legal Services Agreement for 2006 Attached for your consideration is a proposed Legal Services Agreement for 2006, covering representation for both civil and criminal matters. We propose to increase hourly rates charged for civil and criminal matters by $5.00 per hour which would bring the new rates to: Civil Partners Associates Legal Assistants $ 135.00 $ 125.00 $ 90.00 Criminal Partners Associates Legal Assistants $ 115.00 $ 100.00 $ 45.00 In all other respects (other than dates and an adjustment to our firm's pass-thru rate), the agreement is the same from last year. Consequently, I have only included a clean copy for your review. If you have any questions, please contact me at 651-234-6219. Sincerely, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association ~;t Joel 1. J - JJJ:sm Enclosure AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF FARMINGTON AND CAMPBELL KNUTSON, Professional Association TIllS AGREEMENT, effective January l, 2006, is by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and CAMPBELL KNUTSON, ProfessionalAssociatJon, a Minnesota corporation ("Attorney"). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. SERVICES AND RELATIONSmp. A. The Attorney shall furnish and perform general civil municipal and criminal prosecution legal services for the City. B. The Attorney shall be engaged as an independent contractor and not as a City employee. The Attorney is free to contract with other entities. 2. TERM. A. The Attorney shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council, and this Agreement may be terminated without cause by resolution of the City Council. B. The Attorney may terminate this Agreement at any time, provided that the Attorney shall give the City ninety (90) days written notice before the termination becomes effective. 3. FEES. A. Campbell Knutson will provide civil municipal and criminal prosecution legal services to the City for a total monthly amount which shall not exceed $12,000.00, billed at the following hourly rates: 59775v09 J]J:r 12/28/2005 1 Civil Municipal Partners Associate Attorneys Legal Assistants $135.00 $125.00 $ 90.00 Legal services subject to inclusion in the combined $12,000.00 monthly fee cap are: 59775v09 JJJ:rl2/28/200S . Attending all City Council meetings, other City board, commission or committee meetings as required by the City Councilor City Administrator. . Drafting ordinances, resolutions, and correspondence as requested, not including comprehensive revisions or updates of official controls or codification of the City Code. . Reviewing all Council and Planning Commission agenda items and minutes. . Meetings and/or telephone conversations with and advising Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator, Department Heads and other staff on general legal matters. . Reviewing municipal contracts, including contracts for public improvements, developments, joint powers agreements, construction and purchase of equipment. . Consulting on employment related issues. . Researching and submission of legal opinions on municipal or other legal matters requested by City staff or City Administrator. . Meetings with the City Administrator and Department Heads as needed to review Council agenda items, the status of all legal matters before the City and, as requested, the provision of a written status report on current litigation and unresolved matters. . Providing a legal briefing as requested to the City staff and Council regarding new or proposed legislation affecting municipal operations and activities. . Providing, on a periodic basis, written updates and training on new state or federal legislation or judicial decisions impacting the City, and suggesting action or changes in operations or procedures to assure compliance. . Reviewing bonds, deeds, securities and insurance requirements required by and for City contracts or activities. 2 · Reviewing documents submitted by bond counsel involving the issuance of debt or debt related instruments and provide opinions as requested or required. · Enforcing City ordinances, not including civil litigation or criminal prosecution. B. Prosecution: Campbell Knutson will provide criminal prosecution legal services to the City, billed at the following hourly rates: Partners Associates Legal Assistants $115.00 $100.00 $ 45.00 All prosecution legal services will be included in the combined civil/prosecution retainer except the following: · Criminal appeals. · Forfeitures of motor vehicles and weapons pursuant to state law. · Prosecution of ordinance violations initiated by any City department other than the police department. These non-retainer legal services would be billed at the civil municipal hourly rate. C. Non-Retainer Matters: Non-retainer civil matters would include active representation of the City in agency or legislative proceedings, grievance or interest arbitration, real estate sales or acquisition, litigation and appellate matters, and all services provided to, or on the behalf of, the City of Farmington Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Services rendered are billed according to the actual time incurred, with a minimum increment of two-tenths of an hour. D. Pass Through: The customary hourly rate of the attorney doing the work, ranging from $150.00 to $300.00 per hour, for legal services that are to be passed through to third parties according to the City's policies. E. Costs: Out-of-pocket costs without mark-up. Costs include: 59775v09 JJJ:rl2/28/2005 3 · Westlaw and other computer-based research · Recording fees · Postage of 50~ or more · Photocopies at 20~ per copy · Long distance telephone calls · Litigation (court filing fees, expert witnesses, acquisitions, subpoenas, service of process, etc.) F. Payments for legal services provided the City shall be made in the manner provided by law. The City will nonnally pay for services within thirty (30) days of receipt of a statement for services rendered. 4. INSURANCE. The Attorney will purchase and maintain sufficient insurance to protect Attorney against claims for legal malpractice. 5. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. B. Assignment: The Attorney may not assign or refer any of the legal services to be performed hereunder without the written consent of the Farmington City Council. C. Conflicts: Attorney shall not accept representation of a new client that constitutes a conflict of interest with the City. The Attorney shall handle any conflict that arises with the City in the same manner as the Attorney handles conflicts with any other public client If a conflict develops between an existing public client of Attorney and the City, such that Attorney has an ethical conflict of interest, Attorney shall infonn the City of the conflict Attorney may: i) withdraw from representation of both parties; ii) represent both parties with the informed consent of both parties; or iii) represent one client and withdraw from representation of the other client, with the informed consent of that client 59775v09 JJJ:r12l28/200S 4 If the City incurs outside legal fees due to Attorney's withdrawal from representation of the City, for matters that would have been included in the civil retainer, Attorney shall pay up to $3,000.00 per conflict of the legal fees for outside counsel actually incurred by the City. If the City incurs similar outside legal fees for matters that would have been outside the civil retainer, Attorney and City shall each pay one-half of the outside Council's hourly rate to the extent it exceeds $100.00. Attomey's payments shall not exceed $3,000.00 per calendar year. D. Effective Date: This Agreement shall become effective upon its execution by the City and the Attorney. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended without the approval in writing of the Fannington City Council. Dated: , 2006. CITY OF FARMINGTON BY: Kevan A. Soderberg, Mayor BY: Robin Roland Acting City Administrator Dated: ,2006. CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association BY: Joel J. Jamnik Vice President BY: Elliott B. Knetsch Vice President 59775v09 JJJ:r12/2812005 5 j ~ j Bonestroo e Rosene ~ Anderlik & 1 \11 Associates Engineers & Architects 2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul, MN 55113 Office: 651-636-4600 . Fax: 651-636-1311 /O~G) www.bonestroo.com December 22, 2005 Ms. Robin Roland Acting City Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 RE: 2006 Rate Schedule Dear Ms. Roland: We appreciate the trust you have shown in our firm as we've helped you plan and implement your municipal projects in 2005. To help you prepare for projects next year, we are enclosing our 2006 hourly City Rate Schedule and Standard Rate Schedule. Please note the rate schedules list a range of billing rates for each category, as rates vary for individuals based on experience and area of discipline. Our 2006 rates reflect our commitment to remain cost competitive while offering a comprehensive range of services with the depth of experience you expect from your consulting engineer. The increased costs of health and professional liability insurance, combined with the increased costs of hiring and retaining talented staff, cause us to adjust our rates as outlined on the attached schedules. As previously agreed during the City's budgeting process, the increase in the retainer amount for 2006 will be limited to 3%. We understand that realizing good value for engineering and consulting services rendered is important to the City, and we will continue to strive to provide you with the best service as cost effectively as possible. If you have questions about our services or our rates, please feel free to contact either of us at the numbers listed below. We look forward to continuing our service to you in 2006. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INe. ~ff17rl~ Lee M. Mann, P .E. Client Service Manager (65l) 604-4850 1:t~!!:::!: President (65l) 604-4830 Enclosures St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN . Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, IL Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer an<l Employee Owne<l 2006 CITY RATE SCHEDULE Classification 3 person Survey Crew 2 person Survey Crew 2006 $ 113.00 - $ 130.00 $ 108.00 - $ 125.00 $ 99.00 - $ 163.00 $ 104.00 - $ 120.00 $ 99.00 - $ 120.00 $ 92.00 - $ 108.00 $ 75.00 - $ 106.00 $ 75.00 - $ 106.00 $ 76.00 - $ 94.00 $ 60.00 - $ 89.00 $ 41.00 - $ 60.00 $ 75.00 - $ 104.00 $ 61.00 - $ 96.00 $ 60.00 - $ 84.00 $ 42.00 - $ 61.00 $ 155.00 - $ 195.00 $ 115.00 - $ 145.00 $ 38.00 $ 28.00 $ 22.00 $ 80.00 $ 25.00 Senior Principal Principal Specialist* Project Manager Senior Engineer Architect I Landscape Architect Engineer Environmental Scientist Architect Designer I GIS I Landscape Designer Engineering Technician Project Technician Field Supervisor Crew Chief Inspector Survey Technician GPS Survey Equipment Total Station Equipment GIS Workstation Equipment GPS Submeter Unit (per half day) Air Detection Equipment (per half day) * Specialist: Experts in higWy technical disciplines including Registered Land Surveying. These rates are adjusted annually in accordance with the normal review procedures of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. 2006 RATE SCHEDULE (Standard) Classification Senior Principal Principal Project Manager I Registered Land Surveyor Senior Engineer Architect I Landscape Architect Engineer Environmental Scientist Architect Designer I GIS I Landscape Designer Engineering Technician Project Technician Field Supervisor Crew Chief Inspector Survey Technician 3 Person Survey Crew 2 Person Survey Crew GPS Survey Equipment Total Station Equipment GIS Workstation Equipment GPS Submeter Unit (per half day) Air Detection Equipment (per half day) 2006 $ 129.00 - $ 181.00 $ 123.00 - $ 160.00 $ 117.00 - $ 150.00 $ 101.00 - $ 135.00 $ 101.00 - $ 135.00 $ 85.00 - $ 124.00 $ 85.00 - $ 109.00 $ 81.00 - $ 104.00 $ 70.00 - $ 104.00 $ 47.00 - $ 69.00 $ 83.00 - $ 124.00 $ 72.00 - $ 104.00 $ 68.00 - $ 95.00 $ 50.00 - $ 69.00 $ 155.00 $ 195.00 $ 115.00 - $ 145.00 $ 38.00 $ 28.00 $ 22.00 $ 80.00 $ 25.00 These rates are adjusted annually in accordance with the normal review procedures of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. 2006 INDIVIDUAL RATES Individual Classification 2005 2006 Lee M. Mann Project Manager $107.00 12.15% $120.00 David R. Sanocki Project Manager $94.00 10.64% $104.00 Erik G. Peters Project Manager $94.00 10.64% $104.00 Bryant J. Ficek Engineer $89.00 3.93% $92.50 Christina Wurst Engineer $72.00 4.17% $75.00 City of Farmington City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us JOa,~) TO: Mayor, Council Members FROM: Robin Roland, Acting City Administrator/Finance Director SUBJECT: Official Depositories of City Funds DATE: January 3,2006 INTRODUCTION Each year, official depositories of funds must be designated by the City Council. DISCUSSION Minnesota Statutes Section 118 sets forth the procedures for the deposit of public fund~ and requires the vendors be designated as depository of funds. The City of Farmington has money which is available for investment. Different financial institutions offer different rates of return on investment. Investment interest income should be maximized while conserving capital and protecting taxpayer funds. In order to optimize the rate of return on the City's funds under section 118, the following vendors are recommended as depositories for fiscal year 2006: Anchor Bank of Farmington League of Minnesota Cities 4M Fund RBC Dain Rauscher Wells Fargo Investments Salomon Smith Barney The City has made these depositories aware of the allowable investments under Section 118 in which the City will invest. BUDGET IMPACT Revenues from investment interest are budgeted in 2006. ACTION REQUIRED Designate the above as City depositories for 2006. Respectfully submitted, e1P Acting City Administrator/Finance Director /~(i/) RESOLUTION NO. R -06 DESIGNATING DATA PRACTICES RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY AND DATA PRACTICES COMPLIANCE OFFICER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 3rd day of January 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, The Minnesota Data Practices Law requires the City to appoint a Responsible Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Farmington, Minnesota, hereby appoints Robin Roland, Acting City Administrator, as the Responsible Authority pursuant to Minnesota Data Practices statutes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby appoints Brenda Wendlandt as Data Practices Compliance Officer. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 3rd day of January 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of 2006. Acting City Administrator SEAL 106 City of Farmington 325 Oak Stree, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, City Councilmembers and Interim City Administrator ~ Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: RE: Adopt Strategic Revenue Plan for the Parks and Recreation Department DATE: January 3, 2006 INTRODUCTION The Parks and Recreation Department (Department) charges fees for services and facilities that it provides to the public. DISCUSSION Department staff created a Strategic Revenue Plan (SRP). The SRP is attached for your review. The SRP was created to provide better direction to Department staff on determining fees for services provided. The SRP identifies what level of direct and indirect costs should be recovered through the fees charged. The SRP does not set the actual fees for the services and facilities provided, but rather it creates the framework in which the fees are determined. The SRP identifies pricing guidelines, cost recovery standards and pricing worksheets. The pricing guideline is more of an internal strategy that provides direction to staff on how certain services are priced based on the amount of public versus private benefit is gained. The cost recovery standard provides direction to staff on how much of the overall expenditures by Division the Department should be recovering through the fees it charges for the services it provides. The worksheets found in the Appendix will be used by staff to price services and facilities and will follow the pricing guidelines identified in the SRP. It is important to keep in mind that this is a strategic plan and not a policy. A strategic plan provides tactics that are deliberate and will help guide the Parks and Recreation Department as it determines fees. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission has reviewed the Strategic Revenue Plan and approved it at its December l4, 2005 meeting. ACTION REQUESTED By motion adopt the Strategic Revenue Plan for the Parks and Recreation Department. ~ctfully SURi~] < KCVhi", Ot)~ Randy Distad Parks and Recreation Director Farmington Parks and Recreation Department's Strategic Revenue Plan Parks Recreational Programs Recreational Facilities Strategic Revenue Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction.............................................................................. .............. ..3 II. Definitiolls................................................................................................4 III. lJellefits ..................................................................................................6 IV. Description of Services and Facilities........................................... .............. ......6 v. Pricing Services.. .... ...................... ................. ............ ................................ ..11 VI. Cost Recovery Standards.............................................................. .............. .13 VII. Appendix........................................................................................... ....16 2 Strategic Revenue Plan I. Introduction A. Rationale The purpose for developing a Strategic Revenue Plan is so that members of the Parks and Recreation Department, Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, City Council and residents of Farmington have a better understanding of how fees are determined for services provided by the Department. Without a Strategic Revenue Plan there is no clear direction about what the level of expectation is for the amount of revenue that ought to be generated to offset the costs to run programs and to operate and maintain facilities and parks. The City has a Fee Ordinance but the ordinance does not provide any direction for what level of costs should be recovered through fees charged. The Fee Ordinance only sets the fees that can be legally collected by the City. Adopting this Strategic Revenue Plan then will provide the direction needed for the Department to create a fee structure that identifies the level of costs recovered by fees and the level of costs recovered by a subsidy. B. Philosophy A general philosophy that has been taken by the City of Farmington is that parks and recreation is an important service for the community. The City's philosophy is very consistent with other municipal governments meaning that it recognizes city government should provide recreational programs, recreational facilities and parks to its residents. Parks and recreation can play an important factor in improving the quality of life for individuals and the community collectively. The greater question regarding the philosophy is what services should be offered by the Parks and Recreation Department and how much should the City taxpayer's subsidize these services versus how much the cost of these services should individuals and/or organizations be responsible for covering. c. Guiding Principles The Strategic Revenue Plan should take into consideration that fees ought to be fair and reasonable for the public. It also should take into consideration the direct and indirect costs that ought to be covered by fees and charges. With this in mind, the following 10 Guiding Principles were used to develop a Parks and Recreation Department Revenue Strategic Plan: 1. Provide and maintain public recreational facilities and parks by using alternative or supplemental funding sources so that all residents are able to enjoy them. 2. As much as possible and to the extent required by law, provide equal opportunity and access to programs, activities and events for all residents to enjoy. 3. Programs, facilities and parks should be staffed with trained and qualified workers and the cost to provide such staff should be addressed when developing a fee pricing structure. 4. Develop a target goal for a recovery rate at which the Parks and Recreation Department's various divisions' total budget should be covered by fees and what portion of the overall budgets should be covered by a subsidy. 5. When developing pricing guidelines, identifY who benefits from the service that is received i. e. the community at-large or a specific organization or individual. 3 Strategic Revenue Plan 6. Determine why the service was needed and was the service specific to the group or individual that required it i. e. supervision of or clean up after a softball tournament. 7. Determine whether the fee imposed will cause a hardship on the specific user. 8. Restraint should be used when considering the waiving of fees for an organization or individual and should be an exception rather than the rule. 9. Fees that are set for programs, facilities and parks should be competitive with other private and public markets. 10. When setting fees, determine what the appropriate level of direct and indirect costs should be recovered by fees, by other funding sources and/or by tax payer subsidy. II. Definitions Developing a Strategic Revenue Plan requires an explanation of language that is normally used when describing fees, costs and customers. A. Costs There are certain costs associated with the service that is provided. Costs can be broken into two areas direct cost and indirect cost. Following are definitions and some examples of what direct and indirect cost means: 1. Direct Costs These are costs that are specific to a program, facility or park. It is a cost for providing a specific service. In recreation programs this would include such things as equipment, supplies and materials purchased specifically for the program, personnel, contracted service(s) and/or facility rental. 2. Indirect Costs These are costs that are not specific to a program, facility or park but instead are overhead costs that the Department has including: utilities, publicity, and/or other contractual services not specific to the program but still needed for the program to run (contracted janitorial services) successfully. 3. Administrative Costs These are costs to offer the service such as administrative staff time for correspondence, training, marketing, debt service and facility and grounds maintenance. B. Fees There are different methods for determining a fee that should be charged based on the cost associated with the service provided. 4 Strategic Revenue Plan 1. No Cost Fee This is a situation where no fee is charge to an individual or an organization, which means the City will subsidize the direct and indirect cost of this service. A no fee cost is acceptable when a situation occurs in which the entire community benefits from the service rather than a specific individual or organization. 2. Partial Cost Fee A fee that is charged to a group or individual to cover some portion of the entire cost but covers less than the full direct and full indirect costs. In certain situations, this could be a flat percentage charged for only the direct costs. It could also be a fee that is charged to cover all of the direct costs but not any of the indirect costs. This generally means that there could and/or should be some level of subsidy for direct and/or indirect costs from other funding sources such as City taxpayers, grants or dedicated funds to support the servIce. 3. Full Cost Fee This is a fee charged to a group or individual to recover all of the direct and a portion of indirect costs associated with providing a service. This normally means that there is no level of subsidy by City taxpayers for direct costs but City taxpayers would cover some level of the indirect costs. In a full cost fee situation a group or individual who benefits from the service provided should cover all direct costs associated with the service provided and should cover some portion of the indirect costs through a fee charged by the City. However because there is some community benefit to the service provided, the City taxpayers should also pay a portion of the indirect costs associated with the service provided. 4. Market Rate Fee When there is a demand for a service, the fee is charged based on that demand. Generally the market will dictate the fee based on what the competition is charging. Covering direct, indirect and administrative costs is not the only reason for determining the fee to be charged. The fee that is charged is based on what the market will bear for the service provided. Other market providers such as private business, other governmental entities help set the market rate fee. In this situation an organization or individual is the sole benefiting party and there is no benefit to the community. C. Customer Categories 1. Resident A consumer who resides within the community's boundary from which the services are provided and pays taxes for the services to be provided. 2. Non-Resident 5 Strategic Revenue Plan A consumer who does not reside within the community's boundary from which the service is provided and does not pay taxes in order for the service to be provided. III. Benefits A. Value Certain services or facilities have value to groups or individuals who use City facilities or access City services. One of the benefits of developing a Strategic Revenue Plan is so that a value can be placed on the various services provided by the City's Parks and Recreation Department. B. Discipline and Control If groups or individuals know that there is a certain value placed on a service or facility, it would seem to allow for better control of groups or individuals who are paying a fee to access the service or use a City facility. Charging a monetary fee would seem to allow the City to better be able to discipline, control and hold accountable the participants. C. Rationing Creating a Strategic Revenue Plan should allow the City the ability to ration limited services and facilities among a large number of users. The City must be careful that it does not prohibit certain users groups from accessing a service or using a facility because of the fee or charge set. It is a delicate balance between supply and demand. The City must make sure that the supply does not exceed the demand or there will be services and facilities that may go unused. The City must also make sure that the demand does not exceed the supply greatly as this will cause frustration in users who may look somewhere else for a service or facility. IV. Description of Services and Facilities Provided by the Farmington Parks and Recreation Department A. Recreation The City of Farmington is fortunate to have a wide diversity of programs, events and services that it provides to its residents. City Recreation staff not only continues to provide standard recreational programs but it also takes great pride in developing and implementing new programs annually. Recreation staff offers programs, events and services in the following programming areas: 1. Youth Programs These programs serve participants under the age of l3 years. Some but not all example of the types of programs that the Parks and Recreation Department offers include: sports, after school programs, summer playground program, swim lessons and arts and crafts. 6 Strategic Revenue Plan The focus on this group is to get participants into programs at an early age so that they learn about and take an active interest in positive programs and hobbies rather than negative ones. 2. Teen Programs These programs serve participants between the ages of 13 and 17 years. This is a difficult age group to attract into programs offered by the Parks and Recreation Department. There has been some limited success in developing a swim and jam event at the outdoor pool that has resulted in the 13 and 14 year old age group participating in. High school students who are l6-l8 years of age are typically more independent with having the ability to acquire a drivers license and thus are able to drive to more private based programs rather than public based programs. The focus on these types of activities is to provide social opportunities while promoting positive activities to participate in as opposed to negative activities to participate in. 3. Adult Athletic Leagues These programs serve participants between the ages of 18 and 55 years. The focus of this type of program is to provide for a healthy outlet for adults from their work commitments while promoting fitness, exercise and social interactions. Examples of leagues typically offered by the Parks and Recreation Department includes: touch football, co-rec softball, men's softball, co-rec soccer and co-rec volleyball. 4. Adult Programs Like adult athletic leagues these programs are offered to participants between the ages of l8 and 55 years. These programs typically are offered to promote the development of a hobby or satisfy the need for continued lifelong learning. Type of programs typically offered by the Parks and Recreation Department includes: fitness, arts and crafts and individual sports in a non-competitive but learning environment such as golf lessons. 5. Senior Programs These are programs that are geared towards adults 55 years and older. These programs typically focus on promoting the following: development of a hobby, learning a new skill or trade, social interaction and continued lifelong learning. Types of programs typically offered by the Parks and Recreation Department includes: card playing, educational classes on health and finance, fitness, day trips and extended trips/travel. 6. Adaptive or Special Needs These are programs provided to participants of all ages who have abilities that differ from other populations. Often it is attributed to a physical, mental or social condition. These programs focus on providing social interactions, fitness, education and physical skill development such as coordination and life skills such as personal hygiene. There are two types of programs: adaptive and inclusive. Adaptive programs are specifically designed 7 Strategic Revenue Plan for people with disabilities to participate in and are generally segregated activities. Programs that are inclusive provide assistance or an accommodation for individuals with disabilities in order for the individual to be integrated into general Parks and Recreation Department programs. The Parks and Recreation Department provides limited programs that serve this population category. Examples of some of the programs that could be offered are: arts and crafts, sports, fitness and trips. 7. Scholarship Program Members of the community who may want to participate in a program may not be able to financially afford the registration fee. The goal ofthe scholarship program is to provide financial assistance when needed in order to make all programs available to all members of the community regardless of income. Appendix A contains an application form and information about the guidelines/qualifications needing to meet in order to qualify for the scholarship program. 8. Special Events These are events sponsored by the City that are generally open to the public and geared for a large group of people. The purpose of special events is to create a large event that encourages social interactions between large numbers of people. An example in Farmington of a special event is the Rambling River Days. 9. Trips/Tours These are planned excursions that take advantage of private businesses primarily geared towards leisure activities. The purpose of these types of activities is to create an awareness of what is available in the community and in other communities beyond what the City's Parks and Recreation Department offers. B. Parks The City has 25 parks with over 450 acres in its system. There are more than 35 miles of paved trails that have been constructed over the years as a result of development. Park maintenance staff members have the responsibility to ensure that the parks, outdoor athletic fields and trails are maintained at a safe and usable level. The areas of park and trail maintenance responsibilities include the following: 1. Softball Fields The City's Park Maintenance staff currently maintains two adult softball fields at Rambling River Park. Routine annual maintenance work includes mowing, infield dragging, fertilization, core aerating, top dressing, irrigating and spraying for weeds. The City also paints lines to mark the fields for play. The City's Recreation staff organizes and schedules several adult slowpitch softball leagues and an adult touch football league. In addition to City sponsored leagues, the Farmington Men's Fastpitch organization also uses one of the fields for league play. 8 Strategic Revenue Plan 2. Baseball Fields The City's Park Maintenance staff currently maintains two youth baseball fields. One field is located at Rambling River Park and a second field is located at Prairieview Park. Routine annual maintenance work on the two fields includes mowing, infield dragging, fertilization, core aerating, top dressing, irrigating and spraying for weeds. The City also paints foul lines to mark the fields for play. The Farmington Youth Baseball Association uses both of these fields for play. The City also maintains 10 neighborhood ballfields some of which are used by the Farmington Youth Baseball Association's In-House program for games and practices. 3. Picnic Shelters The Farmington Parks and Recreation Department has five picnic shelters that it maintains. Shelters at Rambling River Park and Evergreen Knoll Park have restrooms with running water and so staff members have more cleaning and maintenance work to perform at these two shelters. New shelters at Tamarack Park, Meadowview Park, Hill Dee Park and the Prairie Waterway have been built in the past two years and do not yet have restrooms with running water. Routine maintenance performed at shelters includes removing garbage, sweeping and washing down the concrete floors and picking up litter. 4. Soccer Fields The City currently does not maintain any soccer fields. 5. Tennis Courts The Farmington Parks and Recreation Department currently maintains two tennis courts at Rambling River Park. Maintenance includes picking up litter and replacing light bulbs as the two courts are lighted courts. 6. Outdoor Hockey and Pleasure Skating Rinks The City's Park Maintenance staff creates the ice surface and then maintains two outdoor hockey rinks and several pleasure skating rinks. Maintenance for the two outdoor hockey rinks includes painting lines prior to the initial flooding, regular flooding to maintain ice surface, snow removal and sweeping. Maintenance of the pleasure skating rinks includes the flooding the initial base of the rink, regular flooding to maintain the skate-able surface, snow removal and sweeping. Periodically and when there is time, staff members also will shave down the surface of the ice in order to create a smoother surface. c. Facilities The City's Facility Maintenance Division not only maintains recreational facilities but is also responsible for maintaining all City facilities. This means that staff makes sure that light bulbs are changed, buildings are cleaned through a contractual service, windows are cleaned, any broken items are repaired or placed, the water in the outdoor pool is being 9 Strategic Revenue Plan properly sanitized and the ice surface at the arena is safe and in good skating condition. Facility maintenance staff are responsible for maintaining the following recreational facilities: 1. Outdoor Pool The outdoor pool is located in Evergreen Knoll Park. The outdoor pool has two separate aquatic components: a larger swimming pool with water that varies in depth from 3 feet to 13 feet and a small wading pool that is less than 2 feet in depth. Neither pool has zero depth entrances. The larger pool features one meter and three meter diving boards, a small drop slide, tables and chaise lounge chairs and large shade funbrellas. The City utilizes the outdoor pool for many programs including: swim lessons, open swim, family swim, private rentals and special events. Each of these programs charges a fee with the type of program driving the fee charged. 2. Schmitz-Maki Arena The Schmitz-Maki Arena is a single sheet NHL size (85 feet wide by 200 feet long) indoor ice rink. It has seating for 750 people and when standing room is included it is able to seat up to 1,000 people. The City rents ice time to various user groups including but not limited to the Farmington Youth Hockey organization, Farmington School District for the high school boys and girl's hockey teams, senior men's hockey group and occasionally to other communities youth hockey programs when time is available. The Parks and Recreation Department also offers a learn-to-skate program and several open skate sessions for the general public to access during the week. The facility includes six team rooms, a main lobby area and a mezzanine that contains a concession stand. The City has an agreement with the Farmington Youth Hockey organization that allows the organization to operate the concession stand. The City provides a small sales office where tape, pucks and hockey sticks are sold and a skate sharpening service for a fee is charged. 3. Rambling River Center The Rambling River Center is located at the intersection of Third and Oak Streets. The Rambling River Center is a facility used for older adult programming and includes both drop-in and planned programs. The Rambling River Center is also a facility that can be rented by the public for meetings, gatherings and/or events. The facility is quite old and was converted from a private business use to an older adult center 23 years ago. It provides a home for community outreach programs such as senior congregate dining and the meals on wheels program. The Rambling River Center contains the following building spaces: computer lab, dining room, full kitchen facility, office space, two meeting rooms, fitness room and a sun room. Rental of the facility can be set up for a specific space or the entire facility can be rented out. Rental costs are currently based on a base price for each space rented plus an hourly fee and group rates are based on its non- profit or profit status. 4. Skate Park 10 Strategic Revenue Plan A skate park was created inside an existing outdoor hockey rink. The skate park has a limited number of ramps for participants. The ramps are three feet or less in height. No paid supervision is provided at the skate park. It is open during the hours of7:00 a.m. until sunset as no lighting is provided. 5. Warming House The City owns, operates and maintains a warming house at the site of the two outdoor hockey rinks and one pleasure rink. The warming house has electricity, restroom facilities and can be heated in the winter. Paid staff members supervise the warming house during the hours that it is open to the public. The warming house is open in the winter generally from late December until mid-February depending on weather conditions. During the summer months, the City's summer playground program uses the warming house as a site. v. Pricing Services A. Community Benefit The City must determine what services that it wants to provide to the most people and at the least cost to the participants. These services are generally more heavily subsidized by taxpayers because they are of the greatest benefit to the entire community and therefore it is important to provide the greatest amount of access to them. These services benefit the community through increased property values and/or enhance the quality of life for all residents. The community therefore generally pays for these services through taxes rather than fees. The services are offered to the City's residents at little or no charge. Examples would include: trails, parks/open space, special events, and scholarship program. B. Individual/Organizational Benefit Certain services generally benefit an individual or organization more heavily than the community because they promote the individual or organizations well-being more and the community's well-being less. Services provided are specific to an individual or organization's need rather than the community's need. Often it means exclusive use of a facility, park or athletic field, which excludes the community from having access to use the facility, park or athletic field. The individual or organization therefore generally pays for these services through user fees or reservation fees. As the use of a facility, park or athletic field increases in exclusivity with little or no community benefit, then it seems reasonable that little or no City taxpayer subsidy should be given. c. Pricing Guidelines The Farmington Parks and Recreation Department offers many services to the community. Table 1 below identifies pricing guidelines that the City should use when determining fees charged for services provided either to the community, an individual or an organization: 11 Strategic Revenue Plan Category Service Type of Fee Cost Recovery Rationale Number Charged Target Goal One Rambling River Days No cost fee 0% cost recovery Community benefits as a support, scholarship City subsidizes all whole from the service program, outdoor skate direct, indirect and rather than an park, puppet wagon administrative individual or performances in the costs organization. The community, swim bus, service is equally warming house, outdoor accessible to all hockey rinks, pleasure community members skating rinks, tennis and the service is courts, trails and parks or primarily provided by other community wide the public sector. interest programs or events sponsored by the Citv Two Senior programs, picnic Partial cost 50% of all direct Community and shelters, preparation of fee costs covered by individual and/or athletic fields for a youth individual and/or organizations benefit sport organization's game organization equally. The service is or practice and outdoor equally accessible to all pool (City swim lessons, community members. events and daily The service is primarily admissions) provided by the public sector. Three City sponsored youth, teen Partial cost 100% of all direct Larger individual and/or and adult programs (non- fee costs covered by organizational benefit sport or non-athletic), City individual and/or but still some community sponsored programs at the organization benefit. Schmitz-Maki Arena, preparation of athletic fields for an adult sport organization's game or practice Four City sponsored adult Partial cost 100% of direct Individ ual/organization programs (sport or fee costs and benefits significantly athletic), Schmitz-Maki additional 20% more than the Arena, Rambling River charge to an community. Center building rentals, individual and/or puppet wagon rental and organization to outdoor pool rental cover a portion of indirect costs Five Exclusive use of City Market rate 100% of all direct Individual and/or facilities, parks or athletic fee and additional organization benefits fields and/or concessions 100% charge to entirely and as a result for events, tournaments, or individual and the community receives for-profit making organization to no benefit and is fundraisers i.e. Schmitz- cover indirect and prevented from having Maki Arena for dry floor administrative access. shows costs Table 1. Pricing Guidelines for Parks and Recreation Department Services Existing fees if currently under or over priced according to the categories identified in Table 1 will be adjusted gradually but by no more than 10% in anyone year. 12 Strategic Revenue Plan VI. Cost Recovery Standards A. Background The Farmington Parks and Recreation Department has a history of charging fees for services it provides. However, direction has never been identified on how much of the Department's annual expenditures should be covered by fees and how much of the annual expenditures should be covered by tax payer subsidy and/or other revenue sources. Table 2 shown below identifies from 2002 through 2004 the pre-audited amounts of expenditures and revenues for each of the Department's various general and special revenue fund budgets. The table also identifies by year the percentage of costs that were recovered by fees and the percentage of costs subsidized by other means such as City tax dollars. Recreation Schmitz- Rambling Item Programs Parks Maki Arena Outdoor River Center Pool *2002 Expenditures $268,084 $299,889 $256,349 $121,415 $114,620 *2002 Revenues $100,537 $0.00 $207,225 $53,681 $24,391 Level of Costs Recovered 37.5% 0% 80.8% 44.2% 21.3% from Fees Level of Subsidy 63.5% 100% 19.2% 55.8% 78.7% *2003 Expenditures $369,255 $334,036 $277,892 $125,066 $138,813 *2003 Revenues $122,334 $0.00 $205,821 $65,100 $25,771 Level of Costs Recovered 33.1% 0% 74.1% 52.1% 18.6% from Fees Level of Subsidy 67. 9% 100% 25.9% 47.9% 81.4% *2004 Expenditures $383,094 $325,928 $295,757 $133,667 $146,757 *2004 Revenues $129,030 $5,225 $208,714 $54,571 $34,567 Level of Costs Recovered 33.7% 2% 70.6% 40.9% 24% from Fees Level of Subsidy 66.3% 98% 29.4% 59.1% 76% Table 2. Costs Recovered Through Fees by Division 2002-2004 *figures reflect pre-audited amounts 13 Strategic Revenue Plan Given the historical information contained in Table 2, it seems that standards should be created that provides direction to the Parks and Recreation Department staff and identifies what level of costs should be covered by fees and what level of costs should be covered by other subsidies. With this in mind, Table 3 located below identifies the minimum target level of costs that should be covered by fees charged for each of the different Parks and Recreation Department's Divisions' budgets. Recreation Schmitz- Outdoor Rambling Item Programs Parks Maki Arena Pool River Center Target Level of Total Expenditures 30% 5% 75% 50% 25% Covered by Fees Target Level of Total Expenditures Covered by 70% 95% 25% 50% 75% Other Subsidies Table 3. Park and Recreation Department Cost Recovery Standards by Division It is important to remember that these cost recovery standards are meant to provide broad budget guidance to Parks and Recreation Department staff when determining the amount of revenue that should be generated from fees charged for services that the Department provides. B. Implementation of Strategic Revenue Plan 1. Initial Timetable for Implementing the Strategic Revenue Plan The initial Strategic Revenue Plan shall be reviewed by the appropriate parties and the following sequence should be used for final approval: 1. Staff shall drafi an initial Strategic Revenue Plan and then distribute for review to the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission. 2. The Park and Recreation AdvisOfY Commission shall revie"v the initial draft Strategic Revenue Plan, make amendments to the policy (if any) and then recommend approval to the City Council. 3. The City Council shall review the draft Strategic Revenue Plan for further revisions after receiving itfrom the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission and then approve it. 2. Strategic Revenue Plan Review 14 Strategic Revenue Plan Once the Strategic Revenue Plan has been approved by the City Council, it shall be reviewed annually in conjunction with the Fee Ordinance. The strategic plan may be amended but the following sequence should be used to do so: 1. Staff drafts amendments to the Strategic Revenue Plan and then distributes draft amendments to the Park and Recreation Advisory Commissionfor review. 2. The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission reviews the draft amendments, makes any further amendments to the Strategic Revenue Plan and then recommends approval to the City Council. 3. The City Council reviews the draft amendments and either approves or does not approve the Strategic Revenue Plan amendments. 15 Strategic Revenue Plan APPENDIX 16 Strategic Revenue Plan Pricing Worksheet for Category One Service Includes: Rambling River Days support, scholarship program, outdoor skate park, puppet wagon performances in the community, swim bus, warming house, outdoor hockey rinks, pleasure skating rinks, tennis courts, trails and parks or other community wide interest programs or events sponsored by the City Target Goal: 0% cost recovery, City subsidizes all costs. Program Name: Season & Year: I. Direct Costs: A. Program Staffing Costs (employee or contractual) hrs/wk x _ wk(s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk(s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk( s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk( s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ SUBTOTAL $ B. Supplies/Equipment Costs quantity and description x $ per item $ quantity and description x $ per item $ SUBTOTAL $ C. Facility Costs $ hrx hrs x weeks $ SUBTOTAL $ D. TransportationlEquipment Costs $ rental fee x #of vehicles rented SUBTOTAL $ E. Total Direct Costs (A + B + C +D) TOTAL $ II. Indirect Cost A. Administrative Staffing Charge total direct costs (D) x lOO% administrative charge TOTAL $ III. Fee: No fee charged for service. 17 Strategic Revenue Plan Pricing Worksheet for Category Two Service Includes: senior programs, picnic shelters, preparation of athletic fields for a youth sport organization's game or practice and outdoor pool (City swim lessons, events and daily admissions) Target Goal: 50% of direct costs covered by individual and/or organization Program Name: Season & Year: I. Direct Costs: A. Program Staffing Costs (employee or contractual) hrs/wk x _ wk(s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk( s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk( s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk(s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ SUBTOTAL $ B. Supplies/Equipment Costs quantity and description x $ per item $ quantity and description x $ per item $ SUBTOTAL $ C. Facility Costs $ hrx hrs x weeks $ SUBTOTAL $ D. Transportation/Equipment Costs $ rental fee x #of vehicles rented SUBTOTAL $ E. Total Direct Costs (A + B + C +D) TOTAL $ II. Fee $ total direct costs x .50 cost recovery divided by _ min # participants = $ fee per participant (rounded up to nearest half dollar or full dollar) 18 Strategic Revenue Plan Pricing Worksheet for Category Three Service Includes: City sponsored youth, teen and adult programs (non-sport or non-athletic), City sponsored programs at the Schmitz-Maki Arena, preparation of athletic fields for an adult sport organization's game or practice Target Goal: 100% of direct costs covered by individual and/or organization Program Name: Season & Year: Direct Costs: A. Program Staffing Costs (employee or contractual) hrs/wk x wk( s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk(s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk( s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk( s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ SUBTOTAL $ B. Supplies/Equipment Costs quantity and description x $ per item $ per item $ SUBTOTAL $ weeks $ SUBTOTAL $ SUBTOTAL $ TOTAL $ quantity and description x $ C. Facility Costs $ hrx hrs x D. Transportation/Equipment Costs $ rental fee x #of vehicles rented E. Total Direct Costs (A + B + C +D) II. Fee $ total all direct costs divided by _ min # participants = $ fee per participant (rounded up to nearest half dollar or full dollar) 19 Strategic Revenue Plan Pricing Worksheet for Category Four Service Includes: City sponsored adult programs (sport or athletic), Schmitz-Maid Arena, Rambling River Center building rentals, puppet wagon rental and outdoor pool rental Target Goal: 100% of direct costs and 20% indirect cost administrative charge covered by individual and/or organization. Program Name: Season & Year: I. Direct Costs: A. Program Staffing Costs (employee or contractual) hrs/wkx_ wk(s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hr. $ hr. $ hr. $ SUBTOTAL $ per item $ per item $ hrs/wk x wk( s) x # of staff x $ wk( s) x # of staff x $ hrs/wk x wk(s) x # of staff x $ hrs/wk x B. Supplies/Equipment Costs quantity and description x $ quantity and description x $ SUBTOTAL $ C. Facility Costs $ hrx hrs x weeks $ SUBTOTAL $ D. Transportation/Equipment Costs $ rental fee x #of vehicles rented SUBTOTAL $ E. Total Direct Costs (A + B + C +D) TOTAL $ II. Indirect Cost A. Administrative Staffing Charge total direct costs (D) x 20% administrative charge TOTAL $ III. Fee $ (total all direct costs) + $ (20% indirect cost administrative charge) divided by min # participants/teams = $ fee per participant/team (rounded up to nearest full dollar) 20 Strategic Revenue Plan Pricing Worksheet for Category Five Service Includes: Exclusive use of City facilities, parks or athletic fields and/or concessions for events, tournaments, or for-profit making fund raisers i.e. Schmitz-Maki Arena for dry floor shows Target Goal: 100% of direct costs and 100% of indirect cost administrative charge covered by individual and/or organization. Program Name: Season & Year: I. Direct Costs: A. Program Staffing Costs (employee or contractual) hrs/wk x _wk(s)x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk( s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk(s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ hrs/wk x wk(s) x # of staff x $ hr. $ SUBTOTAL $ per item $ per item $ SUBTOTAL $ weeks $ SUBTOTAL $ SUBTOTAL $ B. Supplies/Equipment Costs quantity and description x $ quantity and description x $ C. Facility Costs $ hrx hrs x D. TransportationEquipment Costs $ rental fee x #of vehicles rented E. Total Direct Costs (A + B + C +D) TOTAL $ II. Indirect Cost A. Administrative Staffing Charge total direct costs (D) x lOO% administrative charge TOTAL $ III. Fee $ (total all direct costs) + $ (total indirect cost administrative charge) = $ total fee (rounded up to nearest dollar) 21 Strategic Revenue Plan Farmington Parks and Recreation Department's Youth Scholarship Application Form Please complete all information. We reserve the right to verify all information contained on this form. Applicant's name: Date: Address: Home phone: Work phone: including parent(s), living in household: receiving scholarship funds: City: Zip: List number of family members, List children's names and ages who would be What classes or programs would you like to register for: What is the total cost of the classes or programs that you are registering for? $ How much of the total cost are you able to pay? $ What is the total amount of scholarship funding that you are requesting? $ Applicants requesting scholarship funding must meet certain income limits. All applicants must show proof of income by providing one of the following documents: D Most recent monthly AFDC or TANF payment stub D A verification letter from a public or private school that states that the applicant qualifies for the Federal Government's Free or Reduced Hot Lunch Program D A verification letter from the Dakota County Family Services Department that states the applicant qualifies for scholarship funding based on income limits found on the next page. D The most recent copy of the family's Federal Income Tax Form. NOTICE: This scholarship funding is non-accumulative and cannot be carried from year to year. The application period is during the calendar year. A new form must be completed each year in order to verify that the applicant meets the current year income guidelines for the scholarship program. Scholarship funding may not be available for all classes or programs. Please allow a period of at least two (2) business days to determine scholarship eligibility Acknowledgement of Correct Information: I acknowledge that the information contained on this application is accurate and correct. I hereby give permission to the Farmington Parks and Recreation Department to verify this information. I understand that if any information on this application form is found to be incorrect, my privileges of applying for scholarship funding could be revoked. Signature of Applicant: ****************************************************************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY, APPLICANT DO NOT COMPLETE Date and initials of staff person receiving application: Request is: _Approved _Denied coverage _100% coverage 60% Signature of Parks and Recreation Director or Designee 22 Date Strategic Revenue Plan Farmington Parks & Recreation Department's Youth Scholarship Program Guidelines l. Scholarships are given to youth l7 years and younger. 2. Scholarships can be used for all lessons, programs and activities offered by Farmington Parks & Recreation that require pre-registration. Scholarships will not be given for daily admission fees to facilities. 3. Maximum amount given per calendar year will be $100/child. 4. Applicants must be residents living within the boundaries ofISD #l92. 5. Applications must be completed and received in the Parks & Recreation Department Office located at 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN. 6. All application and financial information provided are considered private data on individuals and is subject to privacy of information provisions, pursuant to State Statute. 7. Farmington Parks & Recreation staff reserves the right to verify all information contained on the application form in order to grant, deny or revoke any scholarship monies. 8. Applicants will be notified either in person, by mail or phone as to the outcome of their scholarship request in a timely manner. 9. If approved the scholarship form must accompany the completed program registration along with payment of remaining program fees or tuition vouchers from County or State financial aid programs. 1 O.Failure to attend an activity or program that has been paid through the scholarship program may jeopardize future scholarship funding for the family. 11. Families eligible for the reduced hot lunch program income guidelines are eligible to have 60% of their costs covered by the scholarship program. l2. Persons applying for scholarship funding must meet certain income limits to qualify for scholarship funding. Applicant must show proof of income by attaching one of the following to the scholarship application: a. Most recent monthly AFDC or T ANF payment stub. b. Verification letter from a public or private school indicating the applicant qualifies for USDA Free or Reduced Hot Lunch Program c. Verification letter from the State of Minnesota or Dakota County Family Services Department or another County (i.e. Hennepin, etc.) Family Services Department stating the applicant qualifies for scholarship funding based on USDA Free or Reduced Hot Lunch Program income limits. (See attached sheet for specific government programs in which enrolled participants would be eligible to receive scholarship awards and to review current income limits.) d. The most recent copy of the family's Federal Income Tax Form. 13. Income guidelines are based on the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Free and Reduced Hot Lunch Program. The income guidelines for 2003-2004 are as follows: Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 each additional family member add Free MealsYearlv Income $11,518 $15,522 $l9,526 $23,530 $27,534 $31,538 $35,542 $39,546 $ 4,004 Reduced Meals Yearlv Income $16,391 $22,089 $27,787 $33,485 $39,l83 $44,88l $50,579 $56,277 $ 5,698 23 Strategic Revenue Plan l4.We understand that from time to time families may encounter some unforeseen and unfortunate circumstances, emotionally or financially, that may cause disruption and discord in the family. During these times this program may provide some scholarship assistance to help the family along. If you feel you are in need of some scholarship assistance and do not meet the income guidelines please attach a letter stating your circumstances. These are special circumstances and will be handled on an individual basis. l5.Scholarships will be granted only iffunds are available. Questions about the Scholarship Program should be directed to the Farmington Parks & Recreation office, 651/463-l850. 24 Values Statement Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional and cost-effective manner. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Ethics and Integrity We believe that ethics and integrity are the foundation blocks of public trust and confidence and that all meaningful relationships are built on these values. Open and Honest Communication We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. Cooperation and Teamwork We believe that the public is best served when departments and employees work cooperatively as a team rather than at cross purposes. Visionary Leadership and Planning We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be visionary and to plan for the future. Positive Relations with the Community We believe that positive relations with the community and public we serve leads to positive, involved, and active citizens. Professionalism We believe that continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism and are committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and the development of our employees. R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - COUNCIL MEETING ON JANUARY 3, 2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount AFFINITY PLUS FEDERAL CREDIT U EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CREDIT UNION PAYABLE 2,475.00 2,475.00 AFLAC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,077.00 3,077.00 ALCORN BEVERAGE CO. INC. DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 16,708.70 16,708.70 ALLEN HOMES SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 86.85 86.85 ALLEN LEE HOMES SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 25.00 25.00 ALLlNA MEDICAL CLINIC HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 400.00 400.00 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING I ASH STREET PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,119.70 FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,499.70 9,619.40 ANDERSON, JEFFREY & MELISSA SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 1.30 1.30 APPLE VALLEY FORD PATROL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 266.30 266.30 AREY, TODD L. HRNECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 420.00 420.00 B & L ADVENTURES LLC DALSIN MFG TIF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 13,322.28 13,322.28 BACON,LEE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 29.69 29.69 BALUT, JOSEPH & BECKY SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 117.14 117.14 BARBAROSSA & SONS INC ASH STREET PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 64,033.30 ~ 64,033.30 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 2 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount BARKER, BENJAMIN BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 120.00 120.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION LIQUOR OPERATIONS MN SALES TAX DUE 1.48- DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,937.71 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 24.20 2,960.43 BELZER'S CHEVIDODGEIKIA, JEFF SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 308.49 308.49 BERSCHEIT, GARY SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 30.60 30.60 BOWER, STEVEN SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 201.75 201.75 BRUMFIELD, CARRIE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 33.02 33.02 BURINGA, MIKE BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10.00 10.00 BURNSVILLE, CITY OF PATROL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,314.66 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,657.34 ANNUAL SEALCOATING PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,329.98 6,301.98 CAG ONE SKATESHARPENERS INC ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 252.00 252.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 655.00 LEGISLATIVE CONTROL LEGAL 1,482.00 ADMINISTRATION LEGAL 812.81 HUMAN RESOURCES LEGAL 65.00 PLANNING & ZONING LEGAL 1,421.00 POLICE ADMINISTRATION LEGAL 7,369.22 ENGINEERING SERVICES LEGAL 1,269.50 HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEGAL 664.00 POLICE FORFEITURES LEGAL 426.87 ASH STREET PROJECT LEGAL 2,637.66 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 3 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS LEGAL 405.00 INSURANCE LEGAL 78.00 17,286.06 CAPELLE, JAMIE MORGAN INVESTIGATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25.00 '5 nn CARQUEST PATROL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 69.12 STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 5.58 SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 17.52 PARK MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 13.96 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 9.22 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 177.98 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 19.70 FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 347.21 660.29 COW GOVERNMENT INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 226.82 226.82 CLASEN, KEITH SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 17.45 17.45 CMI MAILING & MARKETING SVS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE POSTAGE 300.00 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS POSTAGE 300.00 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE POSTAGE 300.00 900.00 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 21,771.60 21,771.60 COLLOVA, JENNIFER SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 38.32 38.32 CORRARO, STEVE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000.00 1,000.00 CREATIVE CARE RESOURCES SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 44.80 44.80 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER COMPANY SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 27.20 27.20 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 4 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES STREET MATERIALS 8,176.00 8,176.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 5,143.57 5,143.57 DE BETTIGNIES, CORY SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 159.27 159.27 DEUTSCHLE, GARY EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 540.00 540.00 DISTAD, RANDY RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 105.25 105.25 DUEBERS DEPT STORE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DEPOSITS PAYABLE 200.32 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 16.86 217.18 EAGLES-ARIE #4031, FRATERNAL 0 EAGLES CLUB TIF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 5,038.15 5,038.15 EATON PROPERTIES LLC CROP CHARAC TlF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 1,580.23 1,580.23 ECONO FOODS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DEPOSITS PAYABLE 3,249.64 LEGISLATIVE CONTROL OFFICE SUPPLIES 299.14 POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 20.69 PATROL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 31.16 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 13.54 3,614.17 EKNESS, BRIAN SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 40.19 40.19 ENERGY ALTERNATIVES INC POLICE ADMINISTRATION ELECTRIC 1,687.29 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES ELECTRIC 561.73 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE ELECTRIC 702.18 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS ELECTRIC 702.18 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS ELECTRIC 140.44 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE ELECTRIC 702.18 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 5 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 4,496.00 FARMINGTON BAKERY INC LEGISLATIVE CONTROL OFFICE SUPPLIES 33.60 33.60 rARMINCTON CITY CENTER LLC DO\^lNTO\II)N LIQUOR RE" & EXP BIIILDING RENTAL 1046677 10,468.77 FARMINGTON COMMUNITY EDUCATION INVESTIGATION SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 127.00 127.00 FARMINGTON EMPLOYEE CLUB EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE CLUB 87.38 87.38 FARMINGTON INDEPENDENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 33.00 33.00 FARMINGTON PRINTING INC ENGINEERING SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 24.50 ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 340.80 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 25.56 390.86 FARMINGTON TRUCK CENTER SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 10.44 10.44 FARMINGTON, CITY OF LEGISLATIVE CONTROL TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 41.00 COMMUNICATIONS POSTAGE .46 GENERAL ACCOUNTING MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 11.64 BUILDING INSPECTIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 32.00 INVESTIGATION SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 7.00 FIRE SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 15.00 CAPITAL ACQUISITION VEHICLES 13.65 120.75 FEDERAL EXPRESS PLANNING & ZONING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23.50 23.50 FEELY, JOE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32.00 32.00 FERRELL GAS PRODUCTS CO ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE FUEL 72.26 72.26 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 6 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COMPANY DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 252.00 252.00 FLAHERTY, YVONNE HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 300.00 300.00 FORCE AMERICA SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 170.74 170.74 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS POLICE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 67.16 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE TELEPHONE 189.06 256.22 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF AME COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 44.55 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP TELEPHONE 1.58 46.13 FUN SERVICES RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 3,281.50 3,281.50 GARVEY CONSTRUCTION INC STREET MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,466.25 STREET CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,650.00 17,116.25 GEISE, TRACY EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 1,005.00 1,005.00 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 288.90 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 288.90 577.80 GRIGGS COOPER & CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 23,543.99 23,543.99 HANSON, ROBIN BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 120.00 120.00 HARDT, PAUL HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 360.00 360.00 HARTFORD LIFE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 799.50 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page- 7 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 799.50 HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 97.01 97.01 HEAL THPARTNERS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FIIND EMPLOYEE BI=NI=I=ITS 6 405 87 6,405.87 HERLOFSKY JR, PETER J LEGISLATIVE CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 67.86 67.86 HIDALGO, DAVID SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 65.79 65.79 HIGGINS, PAULA BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100.00 100.00 HOFFBECK, BETH SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 88.17 88.17 HOHENSTEINS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,612.15 1,612.15 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC DEPOT WAY ART PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 310.32 EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 310.32 620.64 HOMES BY CHASE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 8.69 8.69 HOPFENSPERGER,CHAD SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 172.48 172.48 HORN, SCOTT SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 20.28 20.28 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND ICMA PAYABLE 4,785.42 4,785.42 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 1,578.34 1,578.34 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 8 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #1 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA PROCESSING 3,600.00 3,600.00 INTERSTATE COMPANIES INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 152.30 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 154.49 306.79 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, CITY OF RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 460.89 460.89 J G LEASING LLC PRECISION VALVE TIF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 15,303.22 15,303.22 JAECKELS WELL SERVICE INC ASH STREET PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,244.00 1,244.00 JENSEN, THOMAS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200.00 200.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPAN DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 24,154.21 24,154.21 JOHNSON,CARLBRADLEY INVESTIGATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 35.00 35.00 JOHNSON, CHAZ BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100.00 100.00 JOHNSON, DAWN BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 130.00 130.00 JOHNSON, THAREN RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 450.00 450.00 JONES, KIMBERLEY SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 4.10 4.10 JTVENTURE CAPITALISTS LLC SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 19.65 19.65 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE FLEET OPERATIONS LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES 2,421.17 2,421.17 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 9 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount KEYLAND HOMES SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 112.88 112.88 KRUEGER, JEFFREY S WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100.00 10000 KWIK TRIP BUILDING INSPECTIONS FUEL 150.69 PATROL SERVICES FUEL 1,723.31 FIRE SERVICES FUEL 388.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES FUEL 165.50 STREET MAINTENANCE FUEL 657.32 SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES FUEL 334.80 NATURAL RESOURCES FUEL 59.71 PARK MAINTENANCE FUEL 362.44 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES FUEL 37.94 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES FUEL 61.56 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE FUEL 479.57 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS FUEL 3,446.00 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS FUEL 167.52 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE FUEL 311.91 FLEET OPERATIONS FUEL 81.37 8,427.68 L & L WELDING INC SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES OTHER REPAIR 845.00 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 325.00 1,170.00 LAKEVILLE PRINTING PATROL SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 154.89 154.89 LAKEVILLE, CITY OF PATROL SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 176.52 PATROL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,390.04 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,695.02 14,261.58 LARSON. TODD BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140.00 140.00 LASERSHARP INC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICE SUPPLIES 49.00 49.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12129/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 10 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND LELS DUES PAYABLE 259.00 259.00 LEONARD, MICHELLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DEPOSITS PAYABLE 3,095.24 3,095.24 LEXISNEXIS INVESTIGATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150.00 150.00 LOCAL GVMT INFO SYSTEMS ASSN. HUMAN RESOURCES DATA PROCESSING 1,128.00 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA PROCESSING 1,048.00 GENERAL ACCOUNTING DATA PROCESSING 1,510.00 BUILDING INSPECTIONS DATA PROCESSING 1,942.00 POLICE ADMINISTRATION DATA PROCESSING 4,777.00 FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 896.00 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 360.00 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE DATA PROCESSING 315.50 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS DATA PROCESSING 315.50 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS DATA PROCESSING 315.50 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 315.50 12,923.00 LONE OAK COMPANIES INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 47.92 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 23.96 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 23.97 95.85 M. AMUNDSON LLP DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,005.85 1,005.85 MADDEN & ASSOCIATES, FRANK HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 53.00 53.00 MARK VII DISTRIBUTORS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,724.40 3,724.40 MARTIN, JUDY ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 27.25 27.25 MEDICA EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 51,923.11 51,923.11 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page- 11 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount METRO ALARM DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 255.44 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 277.39 532.83 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE SAC CHARGE RETAINER 57,420.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME SEWER OPERATIONS PREPAID EXPENSES 64,677.84 64,677.84 MIAMA ICE ARENA PREPAID EXPENSES 125.00 125.00 MINGER CONSTRUCTION INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,812.00 15,812.00 MINNESOTA AFSCME COUNCIL #5 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND AFSCME UNION DUES PAYABLE 634.63 634.63 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 23.56 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 23.56 47.12 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN 1,797.34 1,797.34 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 992.60 992.60 MN CRIME PREVENTION ASSOCIATIO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 40.00 40.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND GARNISHMENT PAYABLE 313.78 313.78 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA LIFE INS PAYABLE 82.00 82.00 MOLNAR, BRANDON RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 80.00 80.00 MOODY COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 175.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 12 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 175.00 MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CO INC FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 71.04 71.04 MVTL LABORATORIES INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 322.25 322.25 NEAL, KAREN BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 120.00 120.00 NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 58.00 58.00 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 88.08 88.08 NRG ENERGY INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,077.02 3,077.02 NRG PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 645.00 645.00 OFFICEMAX - A BOISE COMPANY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 309.03 309.03 OSWALD, RANDY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140.00 140.00 PARSONS INC FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 8,540.88 8,540.88 PAUSTIS WINE CO. DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,609.50 1,609.50 PEARSON, RYAN & ERICA SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 112.26 112.26 PETROFSKE, RANDY DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP FURNITURE & OFFICE E 244.03 244.03 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 6,884.90 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 13 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 6,884.90 PINE BEND LANDFILL INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 29,267.97 29,267.97 PIONEER PRESS RECREATION OPERATING PREPAID EXPENSES 74 RR 74.88 PLAY IT AGAIN SPORTS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD 199.92 199.92 POS BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 465.83 465.83 POWELL, KRISTIE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 6.54 6.54 PRIVATE UNDERGROUND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 78.00 78.00 PRO-SWEEP INC PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 300.00 300.00 PROGRESS LAND COMPANY PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 66,487.76 66,487.76 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO OF AME EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,127.32 2,127.32 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA PAYABLE 9,734.47 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA 11,822.52 21,556.99 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 7,119.38 7,119.38 R & R SPECIAL TIES OF WISCONSIN ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 48.00 48.00 R&R CLEANING CONTRACTORS INC. DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 26.61 26.61 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 14 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount RABERGE, KEVIN SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 105.81 105.81 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 5.43 5.43 RICHTER, SHERRY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100.00 100.00 RIVERTOWN NEWPAPER GROUP ADMINISTRATION LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 21.00 FIRE SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 84.00 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 237.60 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP ADVERTISING 331.00 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 35.00 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE ADVERTISING 189.00 897.60 ROACH, MICHAEL & TIFFANY SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 26.15 26.15 ROBERTS, NICHOLAS SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 10.84 10.84 ROTH, SUSAN & SHERMAN SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 54.68 54.68 ROTTY, DIRK E. BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150.00 150.00 SANDEY, STEVE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 21.16 21.16 SAUTER, BOB EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 1,180.00 1,180.00 SCHAD TRACY SIGNS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP BUILDING & STRUCTURE 591.72 591.72 SCHWlNESS LLC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP BUILDING RENTAL 13,242.16 13,242.16 SHIRLEY, ROBERT W WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 350.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 15 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 350.00 SIEGEL, LEROY SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 2.00 2.00 SONMOR, GREG & SANDRA SE\^IER OPERATIONS RE"ENIIE FNTFRPRI!';F !,;AI FS 3004 30.04 SPECIALTY WINES AND BEVERAGES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 388.00 388.00 STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 722.03 722.03 STANER, KEVIN SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 155.00 155.00 STAR TRIBUNE HUMAN RESOURCES EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING 505.78 RECREATION OPERATING PREPAID EXPENSES 7.15 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 37.26 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 37.27 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 37.27 624.73 STARKMAN, ERIK ELECTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 330.00 330.00 STENDER, BRIAN & NICOLE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 2.01 2.01 STREICHER'S PATROL SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 258.80 258.80 STUCYNSKI, DAVID SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 7.50 7.50 SUNDGREN,MARK LEGISLATIVE CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 63.96 63.96 SUNDVALL, TRAVIS PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 65.00 65.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Council Check Summary Page - 16 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount THORBERSON, DUSTIE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 195.86 195.86 TKDA INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 592.45 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 592.44 1,184.89 TROPHIES PLUS POLICE ADMINISTRATION OUTSIDE PRINTING 52.13 52.13 UNITED PROPERTIES HRNECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20,458.90 20,458.90 VALMONT INDUSTRIES INC LEXINGTON STD TIF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 21,967.77 21,967.77 WALBURN, SANDRA SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 27.33 27.33 WEST TITLE LLC SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 106.47 106.47 WHITEWATER WIRELESS PATROL SERVICES EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 292.00 292.00 WILLIAMS, KRISTINE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 44.34 44.34 WlNDWOOD HOMES SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 108.50 108.50 WINE COMPANY, THE DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 497.60 497.60 WINE MERCHANTS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 11.29 11.29 WlNGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE TIRES 6.00 6.00 WOLD ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS IN FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,204.41 3,204.41 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO Vendor Business Unit RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES WYANDT, SHANE XCEL ENERGY SIGNAL MAINTENANCE RIIII n1Nr. MAINT !';FRVIr.F!'; HRNECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE SODERBERG FOGARTY MCKNIGHT PRITZLAFF WILSON CITY OF FARMINGTON Council Check Summary Object PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTRIC FI Fr.TRIr. ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC Report Totals 12/29/2005 9:58:52 Page - 17 Amount 450.00 450.00 5,086.40 1R 35 7.43 86.04 8.87 1.77 1,657.09 6,865.95 780,430.32