HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.02.03 Council Minutes
COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR
September 2, 2003
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Ristow led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Also Present:
Audience:
Ristow, Fitch, Fogarty, Soderberg
Cordes
Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Dan Siebenaler, Interim City
AdministratorlPolice Chief; Robin Roland, Finance Director;
Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Randy Distad,
Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director of Public
Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services
Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Jim
Atkinson, Assistant City Planner; Cynthia Muller, Executive
Assistant
Charles Weber, Kris Akin, Michael Lindberg, Kevin Gibbons, Tim
LaBeau, Bruce Conner, Paul Hardt, James Karlin, Douglas Bonar,
Mike Heinzerling, Randy Pedersen
4. APPROVE AGENDA
The interview for Personnel Decisions International was added to the agenda after
Council Roundtable.
Councilmember Fogarty pulled Council Minutes 8/18/03 Regular to abstain from voting.
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fogarty to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS
Mr. Bruce Conner, 19901 Langford Lane, stated on Friday the Akin House will be having
a Grand Opening. Mr. Conner invited residents and especially city staff. He stated they
have received tremendous cooperation from the city. They are really pleased with all the
input the city has had. Especially the Inspections Department and Building Official Ken
Lewis. Mr. Conner stated if Building Official Lewis ever leaves he is going to whatever
city he goes to, because he is really tremendous. Mr. Conner wanted to extend an
invitation to the Ribbon Cutting by the Chamber of Commerce. The Open House will be
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 2
from 10 a.m. - 2 p.m. Mr. Conner stated for some time he has wanted to come down
during Citizen's Comments and say a few things about what he has seen as a citizen of
the city for 14 years. He stated he is thrilled. Some things he does not agree with, but as
far as city government works, Farmington can be very proud. Interim City Administrator
Siebenaler has become a newspaper idol. The article in the paper last week was well
deserved. Mr. Conner thought Interim City Administrator Siebenaler should be called the
Farmington Ambassador to the world because he worked the Olympics and the State Fair
for many years. Farmington can be proud oftheir Police Department. Last summer Mr.
Conner was riding a motorcycle and ran out of gas. Before he could get off the
motorcycle, an officer was behind him asking ifhe wanted help or wanted to call for
help. Mr. Conner stated that says a lot. They have had minor things with their children
and the officers have always been very gracious, very friendly, and gone beyond the call
of duty. He is very impressed with the Police Department. A friend of his had a stroke
and saw the response ofthe Fire Department and Rescue. They are a volunteer unit and
they are fantastic. Fire Marshal John Powers has helped at the Akin House with various
things, and Building Official Ken Lewis with advice and direction on things. It was
much appreciated. About 8 or 9 years ago, he broke the wheel on his garbage can. You
wonder how city government works and if this even ties in. He was looking for a new
wheel and thought the city would know where to get one. He spoke to a lady in the Solid
Waste and Recycling department. He called on a Wednesday and was told to leave his
garbage can out on Thursday and someone would fix it. Mr. Conner said he would fix it
himself, but was told there was no charge and someone would come out. Mr. Conner
thought it would be sitting there for a month. Thursday he came home from work and
there were two new wheels on his garbage can. He did not have to call a dozen times,
one call did it. Ifwe can get city government to change a wheel on a garbage can with
one call, he thinks that is doing a tremendous job. There are problems in the city, but it
will all work out. Mr. Conner stated the things that have happened recently with the City
Council and the City Administrator shows city government working tremendously well.
Citizens can stand up here and ask for the Mayor's resignation and not fear retaliation.
Councilmembers can disagree with one another. City staff can even disagree among
themselves. Mr. Conner felt that was healthy for a city and thought the city is working
very well from his perspective. Mr. Conner thanked everyone for the volunteer efforts
that are put forth by the committees and commissions that are part of the city, he thanked
the City Council for their hard work, and especially city staff for all they do.
Mr. Michael Lindberg, Junior Vice Commander ofthe VFW Post 7662, and Post Quarter
Master Kevin Gibbons presented the American flag and a State of Minnesota flag to the
city for the new municipal buildings on Pilot Knob Road.
a) Mr. Tim LaBeau
Mr. Tim LaBeau, owner of Gossips Bar and Grill, asked the Council to allow him
to stay open until 2 a.m. The surrounding areas of Rosemount and Lakeville have
been open until 2 a.m. for the last month and he has noticed a drop in business as
people are going there if they plan to stay out late. Interim City Administrator
Siebenaler replied the code authorizes the city to follow whatev~r state law is.
Current Minnesota statute is to allow for a 2 a.m. bar closing. City Attorney
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 3
Jamnik stated Mr. LaBeau would have to apply to the state for the extended
coverage and pay the state fee and get their approval. The city would then sign
the application indicating the city's ordinance allows a 2 a.m. closure. There is no
formal process for the city. If Council wants to go to 1 a.m., that can be done by
ordinance. Currently, all the bars in town close at 1 a.m. or earlier. Mr. LaBeau
will contact staff to obtain the number for the state.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fitch to approve Council Minutes (8/18/03 Regular).
Voting for: Ristow, Fitch, Soderberg. Abstain: Fogarty. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION by Fitch, second by Soderberg to approve the Consent Agenda as follows:
a) Approved Council Minutes (8/19/03 Special)
b) Approved School and Conference - Fire Department
c) Adopted RESOLUTION R59-03 Set Public Hearing - Ash Street Project-
Engineering
d) Approved Change Order Facilities Project - Engineering
e) Adopted RESOLUTION R60-03 - Spruce Street AUAR - Community
Development
f) Approved Bills
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Adopt Resolution - Vacate TH3 Right-of-Way Glenview Commercial
Addition - Community Development
A portion of the right-of-way along TH3 adjacent to the Glenview Commercial
Addition needs to be vacated as part of the recording process. The easement was
released by the State to the city in conjunction with the rerouting of 9th Street to
the east. The easement vacation terminates at the northern border of the Glenview
Commercial Addition. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fogarty to close the
Public Hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Fitch, second by
Soderberg adopting RESOLUTION R61-03 vacating the portion of the easement
along TH3 in the Glenview Commercial Addition. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
b) Consider Proposed Acquisition/Redevelopment of Blaha Property -
Community Development
The HRA has discussed acquiring the Blaha property. There are two parcels, one
at 2nd Street and Spruce Street. These two parcels are adjacent to four parcels
already owned by the HRA. Council needed to consider if they are willing to
purchase the two parcels. The HRA believes acquiring the property would be in
the city's best interest both long and short-term. There was some discussion with
a party a couple years ago that was interested in building a commercial building
with senior housing above it. They determined there was not enough space in the
four HRA parcels. It would be best for the city to acquire the Blaha property now
and hold the property so the city can explore any options.
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 4
Mayor Ristow stated a gentleman called him today saying he had made a standing
offer for the property and staff referred to another party that was looking at the
property at the time, so there were no offers being taken. He told Mayor Ristow
he made the offer including the assessments and is still very interested in the
Blaha property.
Councilmember Fitch stated if we acquire this property there has been talk of
some specific governmental use for this property. If this turns out not to be the
case, he asked if the HRA is ready to actively market the property. Staff replied
the HRA has been ready for some time. They have been waiting for a decision
regarding a location for a new City Hall. The best development opportunity exists
ifthe HRA also controls the two Blaha parcels.
Councilmember Soderberg stated the HRA did agree unanimously it would be in
the city's best interest to acquire the property. There was an item on an HRA
agenda to consider taking requests for proposals for all of the HRA property.
Councilmember Soderberg had suggested the HRA wait until the City Hall Task
Force had completed their work. The HRA also owns another parcel they have
been holding in case they need to relocate a business.
Ms. Kris Akin, owner of Welcome Friends, stated she has had her business in
downtown for 18 years, and she has watched the HRA do a lot of good for the
downtown and the city. This property is one of the few remaining properties the
city needs to fix and redevelop. She has seen the city work on the City Center
project, the Exchange Bank Building, the streetscape project and it has been a
blessing and a nice addition and positive atmosphere to the downtown. She
encouraged the Council to endorse the HRA proposal to acquire the property so it
can be redeveloped. She sees it has one of the few remaining properties in the
area that needs help and feels the HRA and the city are in the best position to help
someone do that.
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fitch to close the Public Hearing. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Ristow asked Community Development Director Carroll ifhe was aware
ofthe standing written proposal for the parcels already owned by the HRA. They
have been marketed for some time. Community Development Director Carroll
stated when he came to the city he was not aware of any outstanding offers for
those lots. When Mr. Jason Stelter approached him about the HRA lots, at some
point the HRA entered into an agreement to negotiate with him exclusively. He
was concerned the city or HRA might sell the property out from under him while
he worked on his financing. Eventually the agreement lapsed. If there were any
inquiries during that time, they would have been told there was an agreement in
existence, and the HRA is negotiating exclusively with one party. He would not
have encouraged anyone to submit an offer, and did not recall receiving one.
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 5
Mayor Ristow replied that is what this party has told him and wanted him to come
to the meeting, but he could not come.
Councilmember Soderberg stated the HRA is not in the business of selling land
for people to speculate on. If someone did have a proposal to put a project there,
it would have been forwarded to the HRA. To have a purchase agreement for the
property without a project, he would not entertain it. Ifthere is a project, yes.
But to sell property to someone to speculate on, no. The HRA would not do that
in the industrial park, we are not going to do that in the downtown district. Mayor
Ristow stated that is his question, why buy more when we do not have a proposal
for what is going in there. Councilmember Soderberg stated the HRA believes if
they acquire the entire parcel, they can get some substantial proposals and some
good projects if City Hall does not go there. If it does, there are other properties
the HRA would go out for request for proposals. This has been put on hold in
case there are other businesses that need to be relocated. Mayor Ristow stated
this property has been marketed for some time. A proposal came in from this
person and they did not receive an answer back because of negotiations. When
negotiations broke off, they expected to hear an answer back and they didn't. He
is interested in sending in a proposal for the four HRA parcels, and possibly in the
future the two Blaha parcels. Councilmember Soderberg stated at this point the
HRA has told staff not to accept any proposals on property that the HRA owns
until the City Hall Task Force is done. When Mr. Stelter came in, we were
working exclusively with him, but he chose not to follow through. We do not
know where City Hall will go. If it goes on the current site, we have a business to
relocate. Ifit goes on 3rd and Spruce we have a property to acquire. If the
business to be relocated chooses to go on the McVicker property or the industrial
park, we do not know. We are keeping our options open. Councilmember Fitch
stated the City Hall Task Force has completed their job. It is Council's job to
make a decision. Councilmember Soderberg agreed, but the process is still under
review by the Council. Ifthere were written proposals, they were probably not
responded to, because the HRA told the Community Development Director not to
entertain proposals. As soon as City Hall is decided the HRA is prepared to go
out for requests for proposals and get this developed. Mayor Ristow stated if not,
there is more property offthe tax roles. We did go out for proposals before and
we had two people who were interested, one was the Eagle's and the other did not
go through. Mr. Stelter and the person who called him today are the only parties
he is aware of that are interested. Councilmember Soderberg stated the HRA has
not gone out for proposals for quite some time and things have changed. Mayor
Ristow stated if it was to be purchased, money was to be used from selling the
three divided lots in the industrial park. He asked if that had taken place or does
money have to be borrowed from the city. Staff replied there are contractual
agreements with Vinge Tile and Stone and Just Kidding Around Daycare that
include tentative closing dates. Both projects are moving forward. One is in the
plan review stage and Mr. Vinge is completing his plans. There will be more than
enough money generated from those two sales to cover the sale price of the Blaha
property. Finance Director Roland stated the funds will be available from the
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2,2003
Page 6
closings ofthese two properties and the funds would be available at the time the
HRA wishes to purchase the Blaha property without any funds being borrowed
from the city. It would be an independent HRA transaction. Mayor Ristow asked
ifnot, would the funds be available from the city. Attorney Jamnik stated the
resolution indicates the city will not be responsible for any loss. It is
contemplated it would be financed exclusively by the HRA. Ifthat would change,
it would have to come back to Council to modify the resolution.
Councilmember Fogarty stated the HRA is giving Council good information and
felt they are in the right direction. She understood the concern with financing in
light ofthe budget, but this would be a good investment for the HRA. Mayor
Ristow stated he would feel more comfortable ifthere were some plans available.
We do have a person interested and he was sure his offer was still on file. It was a
standing cash offer. He does understand it would have to go through the HRA
and was never presented to them. He would like to see that followed through and
ifhe does have a plan for him to purchase it through the HRA. Staff replied the
next HRA meeting is September 8 and the packet would be completed on
September 4 so there would be an opportunity to put it on the agenda. To some
extent that would run contrary to the guidance staff has received from the HRA in
the past. The general direction was not to encourage or entice people to submit
offers on property when the city has not ruled out the property for a City Hall.
Staff has been cautious to not have city bodies working at cross purposes. They
have been careful not to mislead people or lead them to believe that ifthey make
and offer that before a decision is made about City Hall, a decision could be made
about the HRA lots. That decision should be made by the HRA. The goal is not
to keep people from making offers on the property, it is to structure things so it is
handled in the right way at the right time. Councilmember Fitch felt Council
owed it to Mr. Blaha to make a final decision.
Mr. Paul Hardt, member of the HRA, stated purchasing these two parcels helps
put together a larger piece of property that could be integrated into a larger and
better use for this area. The HRA was acting at the suggestion of the Council to
recommend purchase of the property to keep the options open for possible
development for the City Hall or other development. The HRA's stand was
unanimous and they do favor acquisition of the property. In the long run it will be
very much to the advantage of the city.
MOTION by Fogarty, second by Fitch adopting RESOLUTION R62-03
authorizing the Farmington HRA and city staff to proceed with the proposed
acquisition of the two Blaha-owned parcels. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 7
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) Adopt Resolution - Approving the Issuance and Sale of $6,200,000 Revenue
Notes, Series 2003 (St. Francis Health Services of Morris, Inc. Project) and
Authorizing the Execution of Documents Relating Thereto - Finance
St. Francis Health Services of Morris, Inc. approached the city to act as issuer of
revenue obligations. The obligations are conduit debt, which means the city acts
as conduit and has no obligation for repayment of any kind. They have acquired
the finance for the revenue notes and are asking the city to approve the issuance
and sale of$6.2 million of revenue notes, series 2003, and authorize the execution
of documents. The notes issued will pay offthe outstanding indebtedness of the
Trinity site. St. Francis Health Services will then be the owner of the property
and will proceed with whatever development will take place on those properties.
Mr. Steve Fenlon, ofSt. Francis, stated this does not show up on the city's
finances as any kind of debt. State law prevents the city from having any legal
obligation to repay the debt.
Mayor Ristow stated he received a comment from a life-long resident asking ifSt.
Francis will be re-opening the hospital. Mr. FenIan stated the economics of
hospitals are very difficult. St. Francis operates nursing homes, assisted living
and independent living facilities. They do not own any hospitals. The likelihood
of re-opening the hospital is very unlikely. Once a hospital closes, all the building
regulations it was grandfathered under are gone. To re-open the hospital would
be to demolish it and reconstruct it. Therefore, the hospital would not be re-
opened.
A time schedule has not been established for any renovations to the facilities. For
any issues regarding operations staff should contact La Vern Hoffmann, Chief
Executive Officer or Carol Raw, Chief Financial Officer. MOTION by
Soderberg, second by Fogarty adopting RESOLUTION R63-03 approving the
issuance and sale of $6,200,000 Revenue Notes, Series 2003 (St. Francis Health
Services of Morris, Inc. Project) and authorizing the execution of documents
relating thereto. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
b) Approve Spruce Street Master Plan - Community Development
Mr. Loren Gordon, of Hoisington Koegler, stated they were the primary preparer
for the Spruce Street Master Plan. The Spruce Street Task Force was comprised
of business owners, residents, and Council. Throughout the process the Master
Plan has been presented to the Planning Commission and Council. He then
outlined how the Master Plan was developed. The Spruce Street Corridor
contains 450 acres at the primary entrance to the city. Mr. Gorden presented the
Land Use Plan to the Council which shows the areas where different types of uses
will be located. The borders are County Road 50 on the north, Denmark Avenue
to the east, 220th Street to the south, and an extended Pilot Knob Road to the west.
Along the northwestern portion is a business and commercial flex area. This is a
business park area for commercial type businesses. It is a location for
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 8
employment with a retail opportunity. The frontage along Hwy 50 is the
commercial area and adjacent to that is a mixed-use area. These last two areas are
the commercial core and hub of activity for the Spruce Street area. The land uses
in the southern portion are a mix of higher density and medium density residential
such as townhomes and smaller lot single-family. The higher density would be
condominiums and apartments. There is also park land, a town square, and
natural areas which are undevelopable.
Mr. Gordon then presented the Urban Design Concept Plan which gives an idea as
to how the area could develop. It shows what the relationships are between the
land use areas. The Spruce Street extension is key to the Urban Design Concept
Plan as this is an extension of what has occurred in the development patterns in
the city. This is a gateway to this area and a focal point for his area. There is an
opportunity for mixed use shops, and retail services with housing above around
the town square. Along Spruce Street could be a mix of retail, but more likely
service oriented professional firms with some housing. On the edge ofthe
downtown would be larger pad users. There are smaller pad users that front off
the connecting streets to the town square off ofHwy 50. These are all connected
to the business park area. There is an extension across South Creek to connect the
residential area to the northern area. The trail systems and park features a bridge
over the river to connect north-south areas. There are areas for active recreation
along the gas line utility easements. The report identifies improvements that
would need to be made, and funding mechanisms for the infrastructure.
Councilmember Fitch asked about the mixed-use and living over retail space.
Retail is not 8 a.m. - 8 p.m. He asked how that has worked in other areas, such as
complaints regarding noise. Mr. Gordon replied at one time Farmington had this
mixed use downtown. It has gone away somewhat and it has become a suburban
community. More communities are wanting this mixed-use development where
there are services on the ground floor and living above. That part ofthe
community has not come here yet. There will be people who want things closer,
don't need the yard space and would rather live above something close to where
they work and to establishments that have things they need.
Mr. Glen Nord, representing New Century and the Knutsen family, stated they are
the owners and developer ofthe 60 acres on the northeast corner ofthe project.
The development of the Knutsen property has been ongoing for a significant
number of months. They are caught mid-stream. They have been operating under
present platting ordinances, and now are about to shift gears to the new Spruce
Street Master Plan form of development. The Knutsen's have already made
concessions with staff members in meetings regarding wetland areas and green
acres and have satisfactorily resolved those important issues. The Knutsen's have
expended many thousands of dollars on partially completed project plans. There
is a fear of the unknown, the little details, especially if they could lead to long
delays. Both the developers and the owners have already entered into significant
contractual obligations where they must report to the end-users. They are talking
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 9
about bank end-users, hotel, fitness center, automotive, drug store, senior housing,
restaurant, etc. The developer's and owner's goals are to work hand in hand with
the city including the new project, to shift gears, and to be a good partner. They
are not trying to escape responsibilities for having a nice project go. They do
want it to be a major positive asset for the city. It is a big project and should be a
model project. In the past, they have been told a preliminary plat could be
submitted as early as late September, into October, no later than early November,
depending on which meeting one attended in the past several months. This is one
oftheir concerns. They are aware before this project can be implemented by the
city or any property owners, the AUAR has to be prepared, submitted and
approved. They joined with that and want that process to go smoothly. His
clients are looking for a reassuring comment, a simple friendly word concerning
the following topics:
- It would be most reassuring to know that the leaders ofthe city either believe,
hope or intend that the Knutsen property and it's submission of a preliminary plat
can still be submitted in the next few weeks and dual tracked with the AUAR so
that if things go the way staff, and his clients hope for, come January 2004 both
the AUAR and preliminary plat will be accepted and approved. A friendly word
would be very reassuring to his clients.
- They think enough ofthis project, that they have asked the marketing director,
the chief engineer, the owners and developer to be present so what Council has to
say will be heard by the correct people and relayed to the end-users. They would
like to know that the development of their parcel is not directly tied to the
development of the remaining acreage. They are aware that it ties together and it
is all one plan. They do need to hear that their plat will rise and fall on it's own
merits and their plat will not rise or fall on what their neighbor is or is not doing.
That is very important when dealing with sizeable individual parcels as these.
- It would be most helpful, above all else to hear from Council, that the city does
not object to the development of the Knutsen property at the earliest possible date.
In other words, by switching to the Spruce Street plan, the time schedule that had
originally been hoped for for the Knutsen property can still be fulfilled. Or if
Council feels differently, it is important that Council speaks up and let his clients
know this. They are asking for Council's comments, they are not asking for a
resolution. A kind word would greatly be appreciated.
Mr. Todd Larson, 819 ih Street, stated the park land is either wetland or pipeline
easements. Is that going to be considered as part of their park dedication or is that
considered land that cannot be developed, and they will have to come up with
additional land or funding for park land. On the Knutsen property, it was his
understanding that when they went along with the AUAR, they were also going
along with the Master Plan itself. If they are excluded from the project, are we
excluding them from the AUAR and do they need to come up with their own
AUAR. They wanted to jump on board to stream line this, and once the AUAR is
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 10
almost finished, they want to back off and be their own separate project. The
Planning Commission had issues with this.
Mr. Gordon replied they have identified park land dedication areas. Some of the
property owners may not have their proportional share of park land on the
property they own. The Knutsen's may have more park land proportionally than
the Peterson property. That will have to be reviewed as to how the park land
transfers to fit into the process. The park land is above what the typical park
dedication would be. The city will be a purchaser of park land or negotiate that
through the development process. Mayor Ristow stated the ball park and tennis
courts were recommended, but does not mean that is what will happen. Mr.
Gordon replied that is what the committee would like to see happen.
Councilmember Soderberg stated some of the concern he has heard is that the
land is either low ground or pipeline and becomes unusable as far as the parks
being unable to build structures. Mr. Gordon stated the ball fields are not a
complex-type design, but more of a practice field. Because of the pipeline
easements, only minimal grading would be allowed. The townhome and high
density residential areas would require park dedication fees.
Mr. Larson asked if the pipeline easement and wetland areas are included as park
land dedication. He felt they should not be included as park land dedication as
you cannot do anything with it anyway. The city would be better off to let those
areas grow naturally and take the park land dedication funds or land and do
something constructive with it elsewhere other than put up a practice field where
you cannot put up a backstop. Community Development Director Carroll replied
staffhas heard from task force members and others that those areas on top of the
pipeline may not be an ideal location for athletic fields. The reason the drawings
show fields, is the task force was interested in doing something useful with the
property. Staffhas not discussed with the pipeline company as to how they would
feel about having athletic fields over the pipelines. As far as park land dedication,
the drawings should not imply the designated areas are park land dedication. That
issue has to be negotiated with each property owner. The Knutsen's have
discussed routing their storm water to the east and having a large holding pond in
the area designated as park land. The city would not want to give credit for a
large holding pond as it cannot be used for recreational purposes. This topic will
have to be discussed in greater detail. If the linear areas along the river could
contain walking trails, the developer could argue they should get park land credit
for that.
Parks and Recreation Director Distad stated the park dedication ordinance does
designate that flood plains, wetlands, and storm water ponds do not get credit for
park dedication. When the preliminary plat comes in, that would have to be
negotiated. As far as the park area identified, it is a linear park and more of a
greenway. Some spaces could be utilized for practice fields, but because of the
linear nature it does not lend itselfto a complex. The city would be better served
to find land elsewhere for a complex where there would be 40-60 acres in a
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 11
rectangular fashion for soccer and baseball fields. He sees this area as being more
of a natural area because ofthe streams. Mayor Ristow asked if there would be
any area available for permanent ball parks in the 400 acres. Staff replied
potentially there could be. There is a need for more room to practice so there is
less pressure on the game fields.
Councilmember Soderberg asked if it would be correct to consider the Master
Plan as a Comprehensive Plan. Community Development Director Carroll stated
there are similarities. The Master Plan is viewed as a predecessor to
Comprehensive Plan changes that will need to be made. They do not want to
leave the impression the drawing will limit what the city has the right to do. If the
Council decides they are in favor of changing the Comprehensive Plan and zoning
to allow high density development, and as part of that if it is decided more parks
or tot lots are needed, this document can be modified as Council sees fit.
Mr. Mike Heinzerling, 4889 182nd Street, was part of the Task Force. They
worked on this for 6-8 months and are very excited about this. Mr. Nord had
mentioned the Knutsen's have spent some money, that is part of doing
development. Mr. Heinzerling would like to see this done as soon as possible.
The concern he has is if the Knutsen property is isolated out of the idea, can their
preliminary plat have something completely different than what is planned? Does
their preliminary plat still keep this concept in mind? He asked if it was possible
to work with a preliminary plat along with the AUAR? Councilmember Fitch
stated Council has to approve the Master Plan in order to go forward with the
AUAR. Mr. Heinzerling encouraged Council to approve the Master Plan.
Community Development Director Carroll stated there were comments whether
or not the Knutsen property would be excluded from the Master Plan. Some of
this comes from some discussion that occurred at the last Planning Commission
meeting. Staffhas met with the Knutsen development team since then, and were
able to clarify some issues for them. According to Mr. Nord's comments, staff
believes they are no longer advocating that their property be excluded from the
Master Plan. There has been some fear in the past that things may not work out as
they had hoped. As far as dual tracking this staff is doing more than that. Most
planners would prefer to do things in succession rather than concurrently. As the
residents and Council have an interest in moving forward as quickly as possible,
staffhas four separate things that are inter-related moving forward at the same
time. They have the Master Planning process which might be completed at this
meeting, the AUAR which is in progress based on working drafts of the Master
Plan, things are in front ofthe Planning Commission regarding changes in the
Comprehensive Plan and zoning and fine tuning of the uses permitted and
conditional in the zoning district that exists on the Knutsen property now, and
staff is about to embark into the preliminary plat review and approval process. So
the process is being dual-tracked now and staffwill continue to do that. There are
some risks involved that if one thing does not go as planned, it could impact the
others, but that is a risk the developer and staff are prepared to take in the interest
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 12
of completing this as quickly as possible. Staff is on track to get through the
Master Planning process by early October 2003 and staff is on track to do that.
The second question Mr. Nord raised was whether the development of the
Knutsen property would be dependent upon the development of other properties.
It is not. Their work has been judged on its own merits. They have come before
the Planning Commission with a concept plan that has been reviewed. No one
has suggested that when or how they proceeded would be affected by what others
do. Staff has been in contact with other property owners and some may have
interest in developing their properties, but are not as far along as the Knutsen's
are. They are prepared to wait and see what will happen in the future. Staffhas
always believed the Knutsen property should and would develop first, as it is the
closest to the downtown area. Their proposals will be judged on their own merits,
and staffwill not sit on them for 5 or 6 months until they find out what others will
do.
The third point about whether the city is in favor of expeditiously developing this
property, staff, Council, the Planning Commission, and the Task Force have told
them they are. Staff is doing their best to expedite this as quickly as possible.
People at Bonestroo are dropping other projects to move the AUAR forward as
quickly as possible. Staff has told the developer they will not wait for the AUAR
to be completed. They will take the initial studies before they are incorporated
into the report and get them to the developer so they can review them so the
AUAR is a work in process they are participants in rather than recipients of at the
end of the process.
Mayor Ristow stated that is what was said at the development meeting and
Council is supportive of staff and how it will progress. Nothing has changed and
Council wants the project to move forward. Councilmember Fogarty agreed she
wants to see the project move forward. Councilmember Soderberg stated the city
needs to expand its commercial and business base so they would like to see it
develop. No property owner has been tied to another property owner. The
Knutsen property is the next logical development spot. It appears the dual-track
system is underway. Things are happening very favorably for the Knutsen's.
Mr. Nord stated they are very happy with Council's comments and they will relay
the comments to numerous end-users. They will keep the project moving
forward. Councilmember Fitch stated on the developer's behalf he understands
they have had different situations in other cities with this same type of proposal
which has created some concern. Instead of being a guide line it was written in
stone. This plan has more flexibility.
Mr. Don Peterson stated the process has gone real well and he is pleased with it.
He is satisfied with the Master Plan concept.
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 13
Councilmember Fogarty thanked the Task Force and staff and the consultant.
They did a great job of melding a lot of ideas and concepts together.
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fogarty to approve and adopt the Spruce
Street Corridor Area Master Plan. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
c) Approve Proposed MUSA Committee Structure - Community Development
The Planning Commission and staffhave been discussing reactivating the MUSA
process. The city went through the process a couple years ago and Council has
indicated an interest in starting the process again. Last time there were five
people on the committee. The Planning Commission recommended the
following:
Councilmembers - 2
City staff members - 2 or 1 City staff member and 1 City consultant
ISD 192 Board Member - 1
ISD 192 Staff member - 1
Planning Commission members - 2
Parks and Recreation Commission member - 1
City Parks and Recreation staff member - 1
MOTION by Fitch, second by Soderberg to approve the MUSA Review
Committee structure that was recommended by the Planning Commission at its
meeting on August 12,2003. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
d) Appoint Council Liaison - Water System Vulnerability Assessment-
Engineering
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fogarty to table this item to the September
15,2003 meeting. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
e) Discuss Pre-Council Meeting Work Sessions -Administration
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fogarty to table this item to the September
15,2003 meeting. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
12. NEW BUSINESS
a) Adopt Resolution - 2004 Preliminary Tax Levy and Budget - Finance
Council has received the 2004 Budget which includes the 2004 tax levy. The
state requires the city to pass a preliminary levy for the following year's taxes by
September 15, 2003. Once the levy is adopted, the city may lower it, but not raise
it. The tax levy is $4.651 million which includes $1.106 million for debt service,
and a $55,000 fire levy. The levy limit for 2004 is $4,651,306. For the 2002
budget year the state removed HACA. In 2001 the city received between HACA
and LGA over $800,000 or 17% ofthe total city budget as aid from the state. In
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 14
2002 the tax levy took a $900,000 jump, part for operations and part to recover
the lost HACA aid. Last year the city raised the tax levy by half the amount of
lost HACA and absorbed the other half. As the state took away the excess levy
the city has to levy to the limit for 2004. When the budget process for 2004
began, it started out at -$256,000. The city will be run in 2004 on the same
amount of revenue collected in 2002. In between, the city has grown 23% in
market value each succeeding year. The city is 46% larger than 2002. In the
2004 budget, one position will be added, a police officer. Planning and building
interns will be used to assist with the work. Capital Outlay items are outside of
levy limits as they will be purchased with certificates of indebtedness. That
amount is $750,000 for equipment needed to run the city. Some priorities will
have to be set, and some services may not be performed as quickly as in the past.
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fitch adopting RESOLUTION R64-03
certifying the 2004 Preliminary Tax Levy to Dakota County and establishing
December 1,2003 at 7:00 p.m. as the City of Farmington's Truth in Taxation
hearing for Tax Levy collectible in 2004. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
Councilmember Soderberg: The quarterly ALF Ambulance meeting was held last week.
Former City Administrator Shukle was the Chair for the Executive Management
Committee. The Joint Powers Agreement specifies Farmington to have the position of
chair. The board has changed the agreement to have Mr. Bob Erickson, Lakeville City
Administrator be Interim Chair until the changes are made in the Joint Powers
Agreement, and then Apple Valley City Administrator Tom Lawell will hold the position
of Chair. This was decided as this position needs long-term management and is in the
best interest of ALF Ambulance and the cities involved.
Parks and Recreation
Director Distad: The 21 st Anniversary of the Rambling River Center will be
held September 9,2003, from 5 p.m. - 8 p.m.
14. EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM INTERVIEW
Personnel Decisions International, Mr. Harry Brull
Mr. Brull is the Senior Vice President of Public Sector Services for PDI and has been
with PDI since 1978. PDI is based in the Twin Cities and has been in business for 37
years. There are 1,000 employees, 18 U.S. offices, and they are located in 17 countries.
PDI's expertise is in understanding what it takes to run an organization, what it takes to
be successful in a given job, and the ability to measure people and organizations against
that standard and to close that gap. They have placed 1.4 million people in leadership
roles around the world. In the public sector, search is not the operative word, you do not
need to search for a City Administrator. He has in his office the name of every City
Administrator in the U.S. on a data base. The key is to figure out where you are as a city,
where you want to go as a city, what it will take and who it will take to get you where
you want to go, and look at candidates and say how close to the template does this person
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 15
fit. The key is the person you put in this role is the person you expect them to be. They
have the skills and strengths you expect. If they have deficiencies you know what they
are and ifthey are ones you can live with.
The process has two roots. One is what are you looking for. He will interview Council,
staff, businesses, and the religious and education community. From that he builds a
template. The other side begins with people. Talking to people who recommend other
people, getting solicitations out. He strongly recommended to not waste money in the
local newspaper. He will use the MN League of Cities, and ICMA. He would go
regionally and identify cities in an x-state region of certain size and get every City
Administrator a letter. From that process it is not selection, it is de-selection. You take
the candidate pool and get rid of everything but one. As an industrial organizational
psychologist his expertise is in designing the process, and helping Council do the
interview. He would like to involve the staff, including department heads and
representatives of line staff. He would highly recommend this.
Councilmember Fitch asked ifhis profile was different than other firms. Mr. Brull felt
their questions are different. Questions are "What are the priorities for the city in the
upcoming year?" "What are the challenges both for the city and this person?" "What is
the tough stuff?" The profile should reflect not only a template for hiring, but a step back
for where are we and where are we going.
Councilmember Fogarty asked ifhe worked through the entire process with Plymouth.
Mr. Brull replied he has worked with Eden Prairie, Golden Valley, etc. Councilmember
Fogarty asked what he is doing different in his final assessment that is so different? Mr.
Brull stated his professional expertise is in the measurement of competence of human
beings. He is President of the International Personnel Management Association
Assessment Council. His skill is in testing, simulations, knowing how to interview in-
depth and teaching others how to do it. One thing he has built for City Administrator
selection is a press conference. They take a candidate and give them a newspaper
containing an article on a scandal. They are told in 5 minutes the TV press will be here
wanting a statement from him. In 5 minutes they walk into a room with bright lights and
cameras and two reporters who start firing questions at them. This is video taped and
Council gets to see it. They also give the person a stack of paper and say this is from the
in-basket, deal with it. They also use tools of testing for leadership style and personal
style.
Councilmember Soderberg asked ifhe interviews Councilmembers independently or as a
body? Mr. Brull replied generally independently. It gives more air time and more
freedom of expression. They can be in person or over the phone. They then meet as a
group and discuss what he was told. He does like to meet with staffupfront in focus
groups at a department head level. Councilmember Soderberg stated one thing he has
heard was a concern that he is a salesman to sell us a product and you have this pool that
through your process you have created and that you will somehow try to sell us a
candidate that mayor may not be what we are looking for. Mr. Brull replied he does not
have a pool. He is not trying to sell anything. When organizations hire him for
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 16
assessments for one-three people he tells them you do not have any good candidates or
have one or two that look strong. This does not mean he does not see perennial
candidates.
Mayor Ristow stated ifPDI is selected and there are five candidates, you are not going to
politic for anyone individual. You are not going to bring anyone with baggage from
other cities. Mr. Brull replied some people have had problems with other cities that they
do not bring with them. One thing he does is press searches. It is hard to be a City
Administrator and not hit the press. The people who come here are applying for a new
job for a reason. Mayor Ristow stated this is his third City Administrator and second
Superintendent. Most have all been satisfactory and the consultants for the school have
presented the information very well and left it up to the committee to decide. He is
asking Mr. Brull to be open and fair. Mr. Brull stated Council will get everything he can
find out about the person within the constraints of law, ethics and decency. His job is no
surprises. Mayor Ristow stated the Council had agreed on a 5-state area. Mr. Brull
stated he has the cities sorted by size, so they can send a letter to cities of 5,000 or more.
This is cheaper than an ad. This is something personalized in the City Administrator's
hands in 5 states.
At 6 months post-hire he comes back to look at how the person is doing both from
Council's point and below. They sit down with the individual and Council and share that
information. Mayor Ristow stated if in 6 months, Council is disappointed, what is the
process. Mr. Brull stated if it is fixable, that is one thing. Ifthey want to pull the plug, he
has a guarantee. In 25 years that has not happened. He has had to redo a search with a
different process.
Councilmember Fitch stated there has been some political tension. How does he work
with the Council to bring them together enough to make a decision? Mr. Brull stated he
has worked with Council's who worked together a lot less well. Good healthy
disagreement is critical. The key is to be able to effectively work through differences and
come to a resolution. This process gives the opportunity to do that. He likes to discuss
problems in private. If Council does not work well together, the City Administrator
cannot succeed.
Mayor Ristow asked what his expectancy is ofthe longevity of a City Administrator. Mr.
Brull stated Council needs to define minimally how long a person needs to stay to bring
some stability and consistency to the process. Mr. Brull suggested 3 years minimum. By
professional standards City Administrators cannot voluntarily leave a position in less than
2 years without risking professional censure by their professional organization, which is a
black mark they carry with them. Whatever minimum the Council decides on, Mr. Brull
will tell the candidate if you do not plan to stay for that length of time, do not bother.
Mr. Brull asked how long the last City Administrator was here. Mayor Ristow replied 1
Y2 years. Mr. Brull then asked if Council gave a severance package. Council replied yes.
Mr. Brull replied that is becoming the norm. You will have a hard time attracting
candidates if you are not willing to pay a severance.
Council Minutes (Regular)
September 2, 2003
Page 17
Mayor Ristow stated with the Superintendent search one concern was with longevity and
being actively involved in the community. Mr. Brull replied by law you cannot force
where they live, but you can say I need someone who will be out there active and visible
in the community. The best predictor of that is how have they played the game where
they have been. Mayor Ristow stated if there are functions on the weekends or at night,
that does have an impact. Mr. Brull stated if you hire someone from out oftown you can
give them an incentive to live here. You can help defray moving expenses if they move
to town, but not if they won't. It will get tough with someone from the metro area who
has kids and a home and will drive across town. The expectation of being involved in the
community should be out there upfront. Mayor Ristow stated from the School Board you
get more activity out of the person if they are readily available. Mr. Brull replied you get
some people who live further away that will be more involved in the community because
that is who they are. Others who live in the community go home at night and lock their
door.
Councilmember Soderberg asked if the cities where there was more conflict, were the
placements successful. Mr. Brull stated the person was appoint on a 5-0 vote, and those
people either are still successfully employed or left after 5 or more years of their own
accord in good standing. Councilmember Soderberg stated he hoped the Council could
come to a 5-0 vote on a candidate. His interest is that whoever the candidate is, is
successful here and stays 5-7 years. Mr. Brull stated the higher quality of data about who
you are getting, the more successful you will be in your selection.
Mayor Ristow asked what his time length is. Mr. Brull stated 10-12 weeks from the ad to
an appointment. Mayor Ristow stated once it is started, there are no delays. Mr. Brull
stated it is more than no delays. When we start we put a schedule together that says this
is the date Council will interview candidates so you know it and you can schedule it.
They tell the candidates when they apply, do not take a vacation this week. A City
Administrator should be selected before Thanksgiving. Mr. Brull himself will be doing
the process.
Council will advise all the search firms as to which one is selected.
IS. ADJOURN
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fogarty to adjourn at 10:24 p.m. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
/i .L~' /7//
Tz7C:~ .h-7 ~
Cynthia Muller
Executive Assistant