HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.01.02 Council Minutes
COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR
Aprill, 2002
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Ristow led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Also Present:
Audience:
Ristow, Cordes, Soderberg, Strachan, Verch
None
Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Robin Roland, Finance Director;
Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler,
Police Chief; Jim Bell, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Brenda Wendlandt,
Human Resources Manager; Mike Schultz, Associate Planner;
Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant
Fred Conlan, Paul Speiker, Christy Reinhold, Larry Frank, Tom
Wartman
4. APPRO VE A GENDA
Councilmembers Cordes and Verch pulled item 7a) Council Minutes 3/19/02 Special, as
they were absent from that meeting.
MOTION by Strachan, second by Soderberg to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a) Acknowledge Retirement - Paul Speiker
Mr. Speiker will retire from his position of Solid Waste Operator effective April
15,2002. Mayor Ristow presented him with a plaque to honor his years of
service. Mr. Speiker stated he enjoyed his work and the people he worked with.
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS
7. CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Strachan approving Council Minutes (3/19/02
Special). Voting for: Ristow, Soderberg, Strachan. Abstain: Cordes, Verch. MOTION
CARRIED.
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes to approve the Consent Agenda as follows:
a) Approved Council Minutes (3/18/02 Regular)
b) Approved Temporary 3.2 Beer License - Farmington Fastpitch League-
Administration
c) Approved Temporary On-Sale Liquor License St. Michael's Church-
Administration
Council Minutes (Regular)
April 1, 2002
Page 2
d)
Adopted RESOLUTION R26-02 Approving Signal Agreement 3rd and Elm
Streets - Engineering
Approved Fiber Optic Cabling Public Facilities - Finance
Accepted and Approved City Administrator Evaluation and Approved
Compensation Adjustment - Administration
Adopted RESOLUTION R27-02 Approving Gambling Premises Permit Civil
Air Patrol - Administration
Adopted RESOLUTION R28-02 Approving Gambling Event Permit St.
Michael's Church - Administration
Adopted RESOLUTION R29-02 Accepting Donations Senior Center - Parks
and Recreation
j) Acknowledged Resignation - Parks and Recreation
k) Acknowledged Resignation - Community Development
I) Received Information School and Conference - Administration
m) Received Information School and Conference - Community Development
n) Approved Bills
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
a) Adopt Resolution - 2002 Sealcoat Project - Engineering (Supplemental)
Allied Blacktop submitted the low bid in the amount of$59,655.40. The total
estimated project cost is $81,728. Seal coating will start after June 23, 2002 and
be completed before August 5, 2002. Benefiting property owners will be assessed
50% of the project costs, which was estimated to be $65.41 per residential
equivalent unit. MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg adopting
RESOLUTION R30-02 accepting the base bid of Allied Blacktop in the amount
of $59,655.40, awarding the project; and directing staff to prepare the proposed
final assessment roll allocating 50% of the project costs to the benefiting
properties. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) Adopt Resolution - Approving City Center Preliminary and Final Plat -
Community Development
Mr. Tom Wartman of Farmington City Center, LLC, is seeking approval of the
City Center Preliminary and Final Plat. The plat consists of9.87 acres that
involves a replat of the original City Center development area and the
redeveloped Elm Park dump site. The original City Center plat was approved in
September 1993 to accommodate the construction of the More 4 grocery store and
mini-mall. The proposed plat would replat the original subdivision with the
addition of two additional commercial lots on the former Elm Park dump site.
The Ace Hardware store is currently located on Lot 1, and the Econo Foods store
and mini-mall are located on Lot 3. Lot 2 is available for commercial
development. The remaining portions of 2nd Street, Main Street and the drainage
and utility easement were vacated by the Council in November 2001 to make way
Council Minutes (Regular)
April 1, 2002
Page 3
for this plat. A new drainage and utility easement has been dedicated for the
sewer and water main lines that were connected off of 1 st Street. Outlot A will be
deeded to the City for parkland and will be connected to Rambling River Park.
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Verch adopting RESOLUTION R31-02
approving the City Center 2nd Addition Final Plat contingent upon Outlot A being
deeded over to the City as parkland. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
b) Adopt Resolution - Approving Middle Creek Estates Final Plat - Community
Development
The Middle Creek Estates Final Plat is located to the west of Akin Road and south
of Pine Knoll. The plat consists of26 single family lots on approximately 40.74
acres. The plat contains a single cul-de-sac. Outlots B and F contain wetlands,
and Outlot E will be a pond, each of which will be dedicated to the City. Outlot A
is the parkland dedication area. Outlot C will be deeded to Mike and Patty Haley
for a land swap for the cul-de-sac. There will be a 75 foot wetland buffer setback
on Lots 5-10, Block 2. Staff is looking at eliminating the Eaves Way lift station
through this development. If the lift station is eliminated proposed side easement,
10 feet on each side of pipe centerline, at the connection location could possibly
be changed. The entire cost of eliminating the lift station would be paid by the
City. Council would like this issue resolved prior to filing of the Final Plat. The
Planning Commission recommended approval with the following contingencies:
1. Revise the final Plat to include the 75-foot wetland buffer easement as
measured from the edge of the DNR Protect wetland;
2. File Outlot B as a conservation area with Dakota County;
3. Deed Outlots A, B, E, F & G to the City;
4. Continue working with staff in preserving mature trees during building
permit review.
The landscape island in the cul-de-sac has been eliminated to allow more room
for emergency vehicles. The developer will place a sign at the end ofthe cul-de-
sac indicating possible future through street. MOTION by Soderberg, second by
Cordes adopting RESOLUTION R32-02 approving the Middle Creek Estates
Final Plat with the above contingencies. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
c) Consider Appeal Fee Refund Request - Community Development
Mr. Fred Conlan, 9 7th Street, owns property that backs up to the car wash on
Hwy 3. The car wash owners replaced the fence between the properties last year,
and staff approved the fence in August of 2001. Mr. Conlan objected to the fence,
stating lights from the cars shined through the fence. According to staff, the fence
met requirements of the conditional use permit. Mr. Conlan then appealed the
decision to the Planning Commission. He paid the $150 appeal fee at that time.
The Planning Commission concluded there was enough light coming through the
fence to require the fence to be modified. The car wash owners did not appeal the
decision and will redo the fence. Mr. Conlan is now requesting a refund of the
appeal fee. According to staff, the provisions in the code and fee resolution are
Council Minutes (Regular)
April 1, 2002
Page 4
clear. This was an appeal to a decision made by the Zoning Officer. However,
the staff time devoted to reviewing the request is covered by the appeal fee. Staff
recommended the appeal fee not be waived.
Mayor Ristow stated the original fence in 1965 met the requirements of a
conditional use permit. Mr. Conlan is asking the city to abide by the original
ordinance, stating no headlights are allowed to shine through the fence. Mr.
Conlan wanted the fence installed as originally approved. He should not have to
pay an appeal fee. There are large gaps in the fence and the original height was 8
feet, and is now 6 feet. Councilmember Soderberg asked if the decision of the
Planning Commission to modify the fence, was based on the 1965 ordinance?
Community Development Director Carroll stated it was based on a fact
determination, and what they saw. Councilmember Soderberg asked if the fence
is ok by today's standard. Community Development Director Carroll stated it
does screen the majority of the lights. There are some areas with no gaps and
some with large gaps. The ordinance does not say opaque, so it would meet the
current requirements. Staff would like guidance from Council regarding what
situations require an appeal fee and which do not, in case this issue should arise in
the future.
Councilmember Cordes felt Mr. Conlan was making more of a request than an
appeal. Mayor Ristow stated Council sent Mr. Conlan to the Planning
Commission and he followed Council's guidelines. City Attorney Jamnik stated
either the property owner or someone affected by it could ask for an interpretation
of the code and then disagree. They have the right to appeal the staff decision.
The difference here is that Council directed the process that triggered the appeal
fee. Without a change in the resolution, anyone in the future would be charged
the $150 application fee. You do not want a system where if you win you do not
have to pay. Staff should routinely charge the fee until there is a change in the fee
resolution. Council agreed to deal with appeal fees on a case by case basis.
Councilmember Soderberg stated he had some reservations with refunding the
appeal fee. It is a process that was established and the process worked. The fence
will be modified. On the other hand, if he were in Mr. Conlan's position, he
would not like to have to pay to take the appeal to the next level. Mayor Ristow
stated Mr. Conlan requested the same type offence be installed as in 1965. It is
still the same business that existed then. The Planning Commission at that time
felt it was appropriate for a conditional use. Nothing has changed. The property
owner is asking to put back what was originally there. MOTION by Ristow,
second by Cordes granting a refund to Mr. Fred Conlan of the $150 appeal fee.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Fred Conlan, 9 ih Street, thanked everyone for their assistance in resolving
this issue. The current fence is a joke. In 1965 the fence was suitable. Traffic
and noise has increased 10- fold. He and his family have suffered from it, not
staff. No one that approved the fence suffered from it. We are now splitting hairs
Council Minutes (Regular)
April 1, 2002
Page 5
between 1/4" and 1/8". There should be no light shining through the fence, like
the original fence. Councilmember Strachan stated staff has to make sure their
decisions are fair and equitable and takes great pains to do that. He thanked Mr.
Conlan for the time he put into it.
d) 2002 Assessment, Open Book Meeting Information - Administration
A memo was received from Dakota County notifying the City of open book
meetings. In 2002,23 residents from Farmington attended the meetings.
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
12. NEW BUSINESS
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
Councilmember Strachan: There is a town meeting April 2 at the high school to
discuss the MN survey regarding drug use.
Finance Director Roland: Reminded Council of the goal setting retreat April 13,
2002.
Community Development
Director Carroll: The City of Rosemount is having an open house for their
City Hall on April 6.
Postcards have been sent to 1250 residents who have property that will be affected by the
revised zoning ordinance. There will be informational meetings April 11 and April 18.
A Public Hearing will be held on April 23. Everyone receiving a card has property that is
being affected by the zoning change. According to the City Attorney, if it is just a zoning
change, only the property owner needs to be notified. For a comprehensive guide plan
amendment, cards will be sent to property owners, as well as residents within 150 feet.
14. ADJOURN
MOTION by Cordes, second by Strachan to adjourn at 7:57 p.m. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
~/r?Jh0
Cynthia Muller
Executive Assistant