HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.18.05 Work Session Packet
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Mission Statement
Through teamwork and cooperation,
the City of Farmington provides quality
services that preserve our proud past and
foster a promisingjUture.
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
JULY 18, 2005
5:00 p.m.
CENTRAL MAINTENANCE FACILITY
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVE AGENDA
3. DISCUSS VERMILLION RIVER CROSSINGS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
4. ADJOURN
PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
r:ouncil workshops are conducted as an informal work session, all discussions shall be considered fact-finding, hypothetical and unofficial critical thinking exercises,
which do not reflect an official public position.
Council work session outcomes should not be construed by the attending public and/or reporting media as the articulation of a formal City policy position. Only
official Council action normally taken at a regularly scheduled Council meeting should be considered as a formal expression of the City's position on any given matter.
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: David Urbia, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Vermillion River Crossings Development Contract Discussion
DATE: July 11, 2005
INTRODUCTION
Council approved Final Plat for Vermillion River Crossings at its July 5th meeting contingent
upon the following:
1. The planner shall approve the landscape plan along with design details for the 4
site amenity areas required in the Spruce Street Design Standards before any
permits are issued.
2. The satisfaction of any engineering requirements including construction plans for
grading, storm water and utilities.
3. The satisfaction of any Park and Recreation Advisory Commission comments
concerning trails.
4. Execution of a Development Contract between the Developer and the City of
Farmington and submission of security, payment of all fees and costs and
submission of all other documents required under the Development Contract.
DISCUSSION
Staffwill provide any updates on these contingencies that would be available at the time. Focus
is primarily on the Development Contract provisions that would be unique to this development,
specifically consideration to the Spruce Street Bridge and Roadway extension and financing of
these improvements. Specific details of options will be provided at the workshop by staff.
BUDGET IMPACT
The budget impact would depend upon direction given to staff to negotiate. A full abatement
would mean realizing no tax base creation going towards general fund operations for a period
upwards of fifteen years time.
ACTION REQUESTED
Provide direction to staff for final Development Contract negotiations.
Respectfully submitted,
/;J~/Y? ~~
a-J
David M. Urbia
City Administrator
s::
o
.-
tJ)
tJ)
~
(.)
tJ)
.-
"C
Z...
Os::
I- CD
e>ELn
ZCDO
"'0
~N
<(~
tJ)~
tn~
s::-
.- ~
tJ),
>- tJ)
I- 0
- ~
00
s::
o
Ii
LL.
LL
o
.-
-
-
.-
E
~
CD
>
00
00
00
cO..o
"""10
00)
cr)
~
t
(I)
.0'
....
a.
(I)
Ol
"0
.;::
OJ
"0
c:
m
c:
o
.w
c:
(I)
X
LU
>-
"0
:::J
-
l/)
g
:Bc
.~ ~
~Ol
.-
ffi g
0.:::J
- 0
~()
-gO)
OJ:2:
-
(I)
(I)
....
Ci5
(I)
t)
:::J
....
a.
CI)
~
o
o
q
....
0)
o
C\i
l/)
00
o
t)
"-
a
(I)
t)
c:
m
ro
OJ
~
m
(I)
>-
....
....
.5
:!=
o g,
IOCOm
C\!. 10 a.
O)Nl/)
t,; cr.i ~O
.... -~
OOr--."O~
....JOO(l)l/)
c: 0 0 ro .-
o O~.o ~
l/)g~mro
"0 ..- l/) c:
'5t,;~~m
.o(l)lij-$~
~~()~ro
ro~xU>
..c:_m c
~O(l)l-ro(l)
0.01:': ~:::J l/)
E t) m (I) E l!:?
~:2::2:zma..
w ~ oIC ok << ok
N
~
t)
o
iii
r--.
....
co
cr.i
"""
........COIO"""
mr--.....oC'?
'IOr--.COCOIO
OO"':cO"':
<(IOCO....COIO
CI) ....
~
~
",,"IOOr--.CO
qC'!C'?~q
~'-N-r-~
l!:?
t)
m
(I)
::0
m
a.
o
Q3
>
(I)
"0
....
(I)
a.
l/)
l!:?
t)
m
iti
11
"0
2
10
a.
ro
c:
<0::
....
.E
....NC'?C'?"""
~~~..lI::~
t) t) t) t) t)
.00000
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
-c-'-~N~
- -
o 0 0 0 0
....J ....J ....J ....J....J
0)
co
N.
....
"""
C'?
-
c:
(I)
l/) E
(I) ~
x (I)
l/) $ ~
-g "Om
o 2 (I)
.0 m ..c:
c'""':' ~~
(I) 2} (I).E
Ec:"O
(I) (I)"SF=c
> E 0 (I)
el/)3=:>.E
a. l/) _ = (I)
E5l.Qm~
.- l/) :::J:::J
O)m~E.o
N(I)-mE
~ = '0 l/) .~
:::J>-ffi~l/)
~.oC:$m
_ .-"O~ ....
~ ~.ro 0 ~.(I)
.... .- a. .... c:
';()l/)~&3=
~t)(I)._-oo
m'C..c: (1)"0.... >-
(I) 00 - .~ c: a. t
>-._(1)2: m (I) (I)
o~>(I)"o=o.
NO~l/)(I) e
00 _l/)=o.
_..c:"O.ol/)""(I)
0.t)"S (I) 5l';:..c:
:::JCI)O"Ol/)2}-
c:"O~(I)mc:.9
:::JS"O..c:I-(I)(I)"O
....".o_.oE(I)
C:~=.;"Ol/)-
iti~C:(I)t)"S:32
~c8';.~~ ~ (l)l!:?
_(I) (l)o.l/)
c: E(I)l/)(I)(5 (1).0
(l)2ii 8...c:-ii"O
Em~o-(I)>-"S
'*~ l3O:.EF ~~
.0
<(....
00
:::J
E
>-
m
a.
.9
~
~
m
(I)
>-
o
....
....
(I)
>
o
o
Ol
o
-
"0
(I)
....
.w
(I)
"0
~
('oj
C"'5
10
o
o
~
o
....
--
r--.
~-;l";
ui
(I)
00 x
:::J$
E-
~~
Uro
.0
(I) m
..c:-
-"0
"-::'(1)
~m
~~
- ....
(; l!:?
-(I)
2}=
ffi .!a
E ....
l/) (I)
l/)=
5l.(j)
l/) c:
m"5
(1).0
..c:,
;:'(1)
m .~
0.2:
=-- (I)
c: l/)
~15
o (I)
"0"0
.... (I)
~=
~'O
>-00
t 0
(I) t)
0.(1)
ie..c:
(I) 0.-
E (I) ffi
>-..c: >
m - 0
a.::: (.)
.,f
61912005
Page 11 of 16
.
EHLERS
6 ",,"C;,"tC$ ,_<
CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA - Abatement District
NEW COMMERCIAL PROJECT
District
County District tl
Inflation Rate - Every _ Years
Pay-As-You-Go Interest Rate:
Dale Bond Issued
Total Local Tax Rate
City of Tax Rate
County Tax Rate
School District Tax Rate
Other Taxing Jurisdictions
Fiscal Disparities.EIection (A - inside or B outside)
Year District was established
Assumes First Abatement For District
Assumes First Abatement For Dev
Years of Tax Abatement
Assumes Last Year of Tax Abatement
New Abatement Project
0.0000%
6.7500%
01-Aug-05
N/A Pay 2005
43.7670% Pay 2005
N1A Pay 2005
N1A Pay 2005
N1A Pay 2005
N1A
2005
2007
2007
10
2016
Fiscal Dispari_ Ratio
Fiscal Dispariti$ Metro Wide Tax Rate
Local Tax Rate - Current .
~ WIde Property Tax Rate (Used for total taxes)
Market Value Tax Rate (used for total taxes)
N1A
N1A
N1A Pay 2005
51.1218% Pay 2005
N1A'Pay 2005
Commercial Industrial Class Rate
First 150,000
Over 150,000
Rental Class Rate
Residential Class Rate
Under $500,000
Over $500,000
1.5%-2.0% Pay 2005
1,50%
2.00%
1.25% Pay 2005
1.0%-1.25%
1.00%
1.25%
Property Land Building Total Class Base
P1D Address Market Value Market Value Market Value Rate Tax Caoacitv Pavable
xx.xxxx.XXX 0 0 25,459 1.5%-2.0% 382 2005
Totals 25,459 382
Total Marl<et . Class New Date
Use Taxes Value Rate Tax CaDaCitv Payable
McDonakls. 1,000,000 1.5%-2.0% 19,250 200t
TOTAL 1,000,000 19,250
Note:
1. Tax estimates are based upon market value, construction costs and taxes per sqIft.
2. Abatement run assumes 100% of the building is COllStructedby January 2, 2006 for payable 2007.
Total Local Fiscal Local Fiscal State-wide Local Fiscal State-wide Market
Use Tax Tax Disparities Tax Disparities Property Taxes Disparities Property Value Total
Caoacitv Caoacity Tax Capacity Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes
Comm. N1A N1A I N/A N1A N/A N1A N/A N1A N1A N1A N1A
TOTAL N1A N1A I N1A N1A I N/A I N1A N/A N1A N1A N1A N1A
Note:
1. .Clty of Farmington does not pay Fiscal Disparities
Prepared by Ehlers
Abalement~5
6I9l2OO5
Page 12 of 16
.
EHLERS
. ".'OC'",U. ,.c
CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA - Abatement District
NEW COMMERCIAL PROJECT
Base Project Captured City County School Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PAYMENT DATE
PERIOD BEGINNING Tax Tax Ca:~1fv Ab_ Aba_ Abatement Net Present PERIOD ENDING
Yrs. Mlh. Yr. Ca"'citv Ca~'~1fv 43.7670% NIA NIA Abatement Value Yrs. Mth. Yr.
0.0 l-Aug 2005 382. 382 PRl:SEN"i" VALUE DATE 1 FEI'l 2006 0.0 l-Feb 2006
0.0 l-Feb 2006 382 382 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 l-Aug 2007
0.0 l-Aug 2006 382 382 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 l-Feb 2007
0.0 l-Feb 2007 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 3,738 0.5 l-Aug 2006
0.5 l-Aug 2007 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 7,353 1.0 1-Feb 2008
1.0 l-Feb 2008 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 10,851 1.5 1-Aug 2009
1.5 l-Aug 2006 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 14,234 2.0 l-Feb 2009
2.0 l-Feb 2009 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 17,507 2.5 1-Aug 2010
2.5 l-Aug 2009 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 20,673 3.0 l-Feb 2010
3.0 l-Feb 2010 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 23,738 3.5 1-Aug 2011
3.5 l-Aug 2010 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 O~ 4,129. 26,699 4.0 l-Feb 2011
4.0 l-Feb 2011 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 29,585 4.5 1-Aug 2012
4.5 l-Aug 2011 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 32,337 5.0 l-Feb 2012
5.0 l-Feb 2012 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 35,019 5.5 l-Aug 2013
5.5 l-Aug 2012 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4;129 37,613 6.0 1-Feb 2013
6.0 l-Feb 2013 382 19,250 18.868 4,129 0 0 4,129 40,123 6.5 l-Aug 2014
6.5 l-Aug 2013 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 42,551 7.0 1-Feb 2014
7.0 l-Feb 2014 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 44,899 7.5 l-Aug 2015
7.5 l-Aug 2014 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 47,171 8.0 l-Feb 2015
8.0 l'Feb 2015 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 49.369 8.5 l-Aug 2016
8.5 l-Aug 2015 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 51,494 9.0 l-Feb 2016
9.0 l-Feb 2016 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 53,551 9.5 l-Aug 2017
9.5 l-Aug 2016 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 55,540 10.0 1.Feb 2017
10.0 l-Feb 2017 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 57,465 10.5 l-Aug 2018
10.5 l-Aug 2017 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 59,326 11.0 l-Feb 2018
11.0 l-Feb 2018 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 61,127 11.5 l-Aug 2019
11.5 l-Aug 2018 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 62,869 12.0 l-Feb 2019
12.0 l-Feb 2019 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 64,554 1U l-Aug 2020
12.5 l-Aug 2019 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 66,184 13.0 l-Feb 2020
13.0 l-Feb 2020 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 67,761 13.5 1-Aug 2021
13.5 l-Aug 2020 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 69,286 14.0 l-Feb 2021
14.0 l-Feb 2021 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 70,762 14.5 1-Aug 2022
14.5 l-Aug 2021 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 72,189 15.0 l-Feb 2022
15.0 l-Feb 2022 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 73,570 15.5 l-Aug 2023
15.5 l-Aug 2022 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 74,906 16.0 1.Feb 2023
16.0 l-Feb 2023 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 76,198 16.5 l-Aug 2024
16.5 l-Aug 2023 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 n,448 17.0 l-Feb 2024
17.0 l-Feb 2024 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 78,657 17.5 1-Aug 2025
17.5" l-Aug 2024 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 79,827 18.0 1-Feb 2025
18.0 l-Feb 2025 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 80,958 18.5 1-Aug 2026
18.5 l-Aug 2025 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 82,053 19.0 l-Feb 2026
19.0 l-Feb 2026 382 19,250 18,868 4,129 0 0 4,129 83,111 19.5 1-Aug 2027
19.5 l-Aug 2026 19,250 19,250 0 0 0 0 0 83,111 20.0 l-Feb 2027
20.0 l-Feb 2027 19,250 19,250 0 0 0 0 0 83,111 20.5 1-Aug 2028
20.5 l-Aug 2027 19,250 19,250 0 0 0 0 0 83,111 21.0 l-Feb 2028
21.0 l-Feb 2028 19.250 19,250 0 0 0 0 0 83,111 21.5 1-Aug 2029
21.5 l-Aug 2028 19,250 19,250 0 0 0 0 0 83,111 22.0 l-Feb 2029
22.0 l-Feb 2029 19,250 19,250 0 0 0 0 0 83,111 22.5 l-Aug 2030
22.5 l-Aug 2029 19,250 19,250 0 0 0 0 0 83,111 23.0 1.Feb 2030
23.0 l-Feb 2030 19,250 19,250 0 0 0 0 0 83,111 23.5 1-Aug 2031
23.5 l-Aun 2030 19250 19250 0 0 0 0 0 83111 24.0 1-Feb 2031
Totals 161 031 0 0 161 031
83111
NOTES:
1. Assumes 100% of Ihe building is completed on January 1, 2006 for first increment coIlecled in 2007 which starts Ihe district,
& the 1st full yew of abatement is 2006.
2. Amount of abatement will vaty depending upon market value, tax rates, class rates, construction schedule and inflation on Market Value.
3. Inflation on tax rates cannot ba captured.
4. Abatement does not capture state wide property taxes or market value property taxes
Prepared by Ehlers
A_~5