The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09.18.06 Council Packet City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promisingfuture. AGENDA PRE-CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 18, 2006 6:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA 5. STAFF COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT ,'ouncil workshops are conducted as an informal work session, all discussions shall be considered fact-finding, hypothetical and unofficial critical thinking exercises, which do not reflect an official public position. Council work session outcomes should not be construed by the attending public and/or reporting media as the articulation of a formal City policy position. Only official Council action normally taken at a regularly scheduled Council meeting should be considered as a formal expression of the City's position on any given matter. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Famrington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (9/5/06 Regular) (8/31/06 Special) b) School and Conference - Parks and Recreation c) School and Conference - Fire Department d) August 2006 Financial Report - Finance e) Customer Service Response Report - Administration f) Adopt Resolution - 2007 Safe and Sober Grant - Police Department g) Approve Wetland Alteration Permit - 195th Street Extension - Engineering h) TH3 Cooperative Agreement Application Update - Engineering i) License for Utility to Cross Protected Waters - Engineering j) Approve Assessment Agreement - Ash Street Project - Engineering k) Approve Bills 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Amend CUP Mining Operation ISD 192 - Community Development b) Adopt Resolution - Certification of Delinquent Utility Bills - Finance 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Approve Park Master Plans for Daisy Knoll Park, Westview Park, Dakota County Estates Park and Mystic Meadows 2nd Addition Park - Parks and Recreation b) Approve Agreement for One Year Extension of Recycling Contract - Parks and Recreation Action Taken Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 c) Adopt Resolution - Approve Charleswood Marketplace Preliminary and Final Plat and Site PIan - Community Development d) Adopt Ordinance - Text Amendment Section 10-6-1 regarding Residential Swimming Pool Fences - Community Development e) Adopt Ordinance - Text Amendment Section 10-6-10 regarding Reforestation Committee and Tree Trimming Notification - Community Development f) Adopt Resolution - Bio-Zone Application - Community Development 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Approve Advertisement for Bids - 151 Street Garage - Wold Architects b) Adopt Resolution - Castle Rock Orderly Annexation Agreement - Community Development Adopt Resolution - Approve Mock Annexation - Community Development Adopt Resolution - Approve 01son Annexation - Community Development c) Mill and Overlay Proj ect - Engineering (Supplemental) 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promisingfuture. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (9/5/06 Regular) (8/31/06 Special) b) School and Conference - Parks and Recreation c) School and Conference - Fire Department d) August 2006 Financial Report - Finance e) Customer Service Response Report - Administration f) Adopt Resolution - 2007 Safe and Sober Grant - Police Department g) Approve Wetland Alteration Permit - 195th Street Extension - Engineering h) TH3 Cooperative Agreement Application Update - Engineering i) License for Utility to Cross Protected Waters - Engineering j) Approve Assessment Agreement - Ash Street Project - Engineering k) Approve Bills 1) Adopt Ordinance - Text Amendment Section 10-6-10 regarding Reforestation Committee and Tree Trimming Notification - Community Development 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Amend CUP Mining Operation ISD 192 - Community Development b) Adopt Resolution - Certification of Delinquent Utility Bills - Finance AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Approve Park Master Plans for Daisy Knoll Park, Westview Park, Dakota County Estates Park and Mystic Meadows 2nd Addition Park - Parks and Recreation Action Taken Approved Approved Approved Information Received Information Received RI05-06 Approved Information Received Approved Approved Approved Ord 006-563 Approved RI06-06 Approved b) Approve Agreement for One Year Extension ofRecyc1ing Contract - Parks and Recreation c) Adopt Resolution - Approve Charleswood Marketplace Preliminary and Final Plat and Site PIan - Community Development d) Adopt Ordinance - Text Amendment Section 10-6-1 regarding Residential Swimming Pool Fences - Community Development e) Adopt Resolution - Bio-Zone Application - Community Development 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Approve Advertisement for Bids - 1 st Street Garage - Wold Architects b) Adopt Resolution - Castle Rock Orderly Annexation Agreement - Community Development Adopt Resolution - Approve Mock Annexation - Community Development Adopt Resolution - Approve Olson Annexation - Community Development c) Mill and Overlay Project - Engineering (Supplemental) 12. NEWBUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN Approved R107-06 Ord 006-562 R108-06 Approved R109-06 RllO-06 Rlll-06 $756,000 Option City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463~7111 Fax (651) 463~2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter J. Herlofsky, JI. City Administrator SUBJECT: Supplemental Agenda DATE: September 18, 2006 It is requested the September 18, 2006 agenda be amended as follows: CONSENT AGENDA 7c) School and Conference - Fire Department Attached is additional information regarding the Fire Chiefs Annual Conference. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 11 c) Mill and Overlay Project - Engineering Attached is the following information for the Mill and Overlay project: - Project description - Time schedule - Financing :! ! / /' lIt !<~//i' City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7~ TO: -\ Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator, "''/ FROM: Tim Pietsch, Fire Chief SUBJECT: School and Conference DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION Minnesota State Fire Chief's Annual Conference, Duluth MN DISCUSSION Four members of the Farmington Fire Department have signed up to attend classes at this annual conference. Tim Pietsch and Terry Thraen have signed up for Chief's Issues and Hot Topics. Troy Corrigan, and Todd Kindseth have signed up for New Chief's Workshop and After the Incident. The Friday program is a symposium all day. Saturday is the Awards banquet and balllater that evening. BUDGET IMPACT The 2006 budget provides adequate funding for this request. The funding would come out of the training portion of the budget, category 1060-6470. The registration fee is $150.00 per attendee for a total of $600.00. All four attendees will be driving separately; mileage should be around 365 miles round trip, $162.00. Motel will run $99.00 per night per attendee, 2-3 nights, $198.00-297.00. ACTION REQUESTED Approve Fire Chief s request to send these members to the annual conference. Respectfully Submitted, ~ ~ ~~J- Tim Pietsch Fire Chief cc: file CITY of FARMINGTON 2006 MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT Project No. 06-01 Construction options for completing project Work to be done in all options: . Leave in place 8,000 SY of bituminous in good condition for overlaying. . Remove 2-112" of bituminous/sub-soils with milling equipment on 16640 SY . Subbase stabilization with reclaimer and blending fly ash into subbase to 16640 SY · It is anticipated that 1,000 TN of CL5 will be needed to complete the work · Remaining work to be picked from options listed Approved Method I" 1-112" 2" 6" Updated Cost I" 1-1/2" 2" 6" OPTIONS 1 1-112" 2" 6" 2 I" 2" 6" 3 I" 2-112" 6" 4 1-1/2" 1-112" 6" Bituminous wear overlay on saved good area Bituminous wear on milled out area Bituminous base on milled out area CL 5 aggregate on milled out area Bituminous wear overlay on saved good area Bituminous wear on milled out area Bituminous base on milled out area CL 5 aggregate on milled out area Bituminous wear on all roads Bituminous base on flyash treated area Flyash treatment on milled out area Bituminous wear on all roads Bituminous base onflyash treated area Flyash treatment on milled out area Bituminous wear on all roads Bituminous base on flyash treated area Flyash treatment on milled out area Bituminous wear on all roads Bituminous base on flyash treated area Flyash treatment on milled out area Existing subbase Existing subbase $609,700 $756,000 $697,000 $663,000 $690,000 $670,000 z 0 i= f5 00 "<t "<t 0 (0 (0 w <D~ 0 ~N Z W ::i: ~~ ::i: 0 c..> w c:: 00 "<t"<t (0(0 <D~ ~N ~;... ~ N 00 "<t"<t (0(0 <D~ ~ N C\i;'" ggg8ggg~8ggggggg~gg~gggggg~~~ ~~~~~~gg~~gg~ggggg~~~g~~gggg~~~~ ~~OWVN _OOM ~~ ~~_~m~N~VONWN ~m~E~~~ ~_~~ ~~ WOmM~N~~NWNIDMO ~~~<0 m 0~~~ M~ _~_W~_~~~0_ID~~ iE~- ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~= ~(O (0 ~~~~ ~ 0 ~ 0 c~8~ MOaOOOO 00 oooo~a~~WNO '_~~~I> ~ g~~~ ~~ ~~~~;~lOCO ~ ~ .S .5 0 <0 --..- -- ~ ~ ~ ..... ~~~ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~- o~oooo~voomooooo~oo~OOooooN~m ~ ~~~~gg~~gg~ggg~gg~~g~~gggg~~~~ ~~~OWVN ~oo~ ~- m ~_~m~N~VON~~N i~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~g iE~- ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~(O (0 m~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~&~ _MgOgg~~o~~o ~ ~g~~g~~~~g"- '<:0>-1- (0 o"<t<O(o (0(0 Lt) (OC')N 0 '" =~'~'5 co ---~ ~~ ..- N -~- ..- >->> u:::Jl:g 000 0000 00 0 OOOOOOOOOOONN c~~~ I d~~ci I ~~, ;: I I ~~~~dci~~ci~:~~ ~ 5~~~ ~b~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~g~8~b~~ ~m E~ ~ M-M~ ~~ V m~M~N~~N~NoMri 5i~:;: <( ~ __(\I ct)co co ~- 'r-ot- -~ ~ ;N~~; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0~~~~~~~ c~8~. _MOOOoooooao 0 oOO~O~~WNO ~ __O>~_ 0 oo~"<t~"<t ~ NOLt)"<tOLt)"'~~O -~O~~ m o~~w ~w ~ ~~N~O ~ ~~~5 ~ ~~-~ ~~ ~ N ~~~ ,.- ~m~ 00 v"<t <0(0 <D~ ~N OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~ o~oooo~~oowoooo~~oo~ooOOOO~OM ~ ~~~~Igg~~gg~gggggg~~g~~gggg~~~~ ~;~O~~N ~oo~ v~ v~,.-~m~N~vONomw i!~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~8~~~~~~~~~~~g ~E~' ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~(o <0 ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o~&~ ~~OOOOOO ~~ ~~8~~g~~~~g . ~OQ~ g g~~~ ~~ ~~~N~~ ~ o gJ oS .5 8 cb,.- - -- ~ ":" ~ ..... ...," ."1 ' ~~~ ~~ o o J: I- W :i! c w > o c:: Q. ~ 000000 ~ O~Oo"<t<O ~~coc"":"":cicicO"": uQ)i~~~g;w~~ ~<C>EIO~"<t ~N =~.o<(~ ~ ... ::i:o~ ~ :S ~~ ~.E l::! _ O~';..:: =en~O ~o!l~ 00000 .qoooo 0<6000 ~Lt)~~~ C') '<t ~~ ~~ 00000000000<010 NOOOOOOOOOf'--VT'" oooo-ioooocONlliai ~~Lt)Of'--Lt)OOOWM,,"O m r-NNr-LOVlt)(I) U'>..... MNlOl.Ofi-NNWr-Na) $0r-- f&0'!"""000 ~~ ~<O 10 ~ ... 00 0(0 ;!:: N~ m '" N <0 ~~ ~ ;; _(1')0000 o "<t<O Lt) C') '" 000 "<t"<t 10<0 ~(O N~ 00 "<t<O Lt)<O ~ ~og~8~Lt)~Lt)g N N,.- V N T"- <0 N ~gg~~~mm~~~~~8~~~~~gg~8gg8~ ~B~NNIli~~~~~NIli~Ili-i~ooo~oNooog'<6 m.~NLt)NN~,~$00W~~~~~Lt)~I.O~~ ~OLt) ~ 0~m~~~ ~~~~fi _5~_~~ ~-Lt)~ $ $$0~ '6' 'c $ <(::> 'cen5~~~~~>>>>>>ZZZZZ~ZZ<(<(<(<(> en ::>~>~~~enenencnenenenenl-I-I-I-I-~I-I-wwwwen ~ 1$ ~ t) c: 8 ~ Xl Ia; 1:. rIl ~ I;;! JlI g ~ ~ Iu; ~ ~ g ~ .m IS ~ ~m g rIl 55 ~~ m ~~-~ g~ 56 k ~ ~omt) E~ I- ~~2 ~~ ~ ~;8~~ ~~ Z tIlm5~~I~BB~rIl ~ 5~u~B ffi~ ::> ~~55~cmro~~ ~~~8~sm~ S~~ ~ 055~a~~E~~~~ ~rIl~~2't)5~E ~m~ <( ~ -~- ww ~ k8oc:~->= #~8 ~ c8~~~~~~m~~~~_o~~~.~~ i- < 8t1l~ ~m ~~",w-8~_~k_~m rIlo!l 2'1- ~~~>_~oo -~ c:~~tIlkk'<: ~~ c: O~~- ~ucc~x~~~_~mmOm -'~X -0 ~ m m ~ m ~ ~._.- > m > m m ~ I ~ m~ ~ m 0 _ 0 ~I- -~~~o~o EE ~m~mc~ ~~o~~~ c e~~~c:ec:g~~m~x~~~oc:EXlt)~~5>~ BO ~~=~~8g8~~~~~~~M~~g~~~~Ec~~ -~ ~8~~~m8~~m~EE5>>>>>g>gEB~m~ro~<( ~t)Q~~~_c::~~~roroE::i:::i:~~~~~~~",~i5~Q::i: ~it=~EEE2 DEEUUE~!!!!~!IO?~~~~~~i= m~TI~mmm~.-mw~~o'~'>?I>.>~.5~~m~~~~u~ ol-<(c::c::c::C:C::::i:c::c::c::c::c..>I-I-I-~~ml-o<(c::enc::c::en<(w E~ NMV~ m~ 00 mO~N~~~W~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ I~~~ ~~~~~,.-~~ N 1i5 ~ .<: rIl f/) .... f/) o U> o~ 00 W'O .... Ql ~~ 0..:0 ::)<( OooU>>' O..J<o..!!! :r:ul!!lo ...._<(> ~~'O_o :=0;- O:E8oll ~ :; 0)= Oc.c:~ B:~'>'7 D.._tO..- G.:i(l)::- <(u.ollN .... 0'0 c: 0 U> ~=~ooooooooooooooSooooooooooS '~~o~~~~~~~~~~~qq~~~~qQ~qqqqQ~ ~:E'OOOVOM~~O~OOOOO~OOMOOOOOOON E'O~~~re~8~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~gg~gg 80~~ N ri~ri ~~ ri ~M ~ ri ri~ ri~ _~~ ~ ~~..- NM ~ ro~ ~ ~ 0~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ 0 ~~ ~ - U<(oll (') (') (')CO ~~ 1010 ~cD ~V ~ ... 00000000 oanooooanv -c:,....:,...:~cici~~ci ~NOOCO~~I'-OOOO o ~I:'!: N ~ 0 0 (') E ~'= I'- (') ~ M I'- <(....... (J) fA-..-..-N U; 069-0 00000 00000 ~ggg~ V NN I'- (')0> (') CO N ~ ...~ OOOOOOOOOOOOO>O>C') ~NOOOOOOOOONI'-O>ClO c:ic:i<"ic:ic:i.c:ic:ic:ic:icciNo).....:.., CO~NOOOOl'-OOOOOl'-I'-~VC') (O<>>..-.......ONN&OVONO..-NIO M~OO!'l~OOO>CON~NNVCO..,; ~::w.V769-~:;tR-EA-tR-:;~Eh~:!: 69- W- W- M- '0 iii ni c: '0 'C: o ....(W)oooooooo 00 OOOOOOOOOOO~NO Z 0 OOOOVOV vv CONOI,t)Il)OIOCO..-..-a ~ OV~~O~ ~OO ~N(')N CO CO CO ..-......-~~~ ~ ~N ~ ~ 0 ~ I~ 000000 00000 00 OOOOOOOOOOO~CD O&OOOV~ vOOOO O~ NOOOOOOOOOl'-V.... C""':"":OOcO"": ggggg .."j.~ c:ic:ic:ic:i.c:ic:ic:ic:icON.ocO ~NOOO>~NV N~ ~~&OOl'-&OOOO~(,)I'-C Ocovcn ....CD (')v (J) ,....NC'\I.......~VLC)~..-~....... EOO~V ~N 1'-1'- 0> CO ~ ~~~~ ~~~r:;~~ <( ~ ~ IUi NN NCO ~ ~~ ~~ ;;; ~~ ~~ CD ~ ~ tit ~ (')0000 000 00 000001010(0100 ~ Z; 0 v~ vv vCO N I,t)C'\IOv T"" 0 10 (') ~~ &0 ~ N N CO V CO v~ ~ N ~ N 'al 0 N ~ Ql .s:: U> 0 0000 00 0 000000000 0 0 OOv~ 00 0 000000000 0 ....: c:ic:icci"": "":0 N ccic:ic:ic:ic:ic:ic:ic:ic:i c:i N CONNV CO I'- &0 VOO..-tOOIOOv 0 -~ &0 101;; CO ON 0 NCON&OI'-&OI'-OO~ 0 gl~ Ol~ (') C)..-C\lCO....W.0C\1('t) ri gl~ ~ I~ 0> ~~;,.;;;~ ~;; I'- I;;; ~ (') E ~ <( ~ 0000 00 0 000010&010100 OOvCO 00 N OONO 0 ~ O~ (') ~ CO I'- ~~ 10 0 I'- 1'-(') ~ ~ N 0 N JI~~!~~~~S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~! ~~~~~~~~~~~tR-W-~W-~~~~~~~~~~~gw- :O~&O~ ~ ~~~~ <(:J~ ~U)~u.u.u.u.u.>>>>>>ZZZZZ~ZZ<(<(<(<(> U) :J..J>..J..J..JU)U)U)U)U)U)U)U)....................~........WWWWU) ..J ~ l!! o c: 8 ~ <0 ~ ~ :2 I, gc:_ ~ g ...~Ui.s:: .. g:E mm ~s ~ ~~ 2 gg ~~ ~ ~~~~ g~ ~~~ MO ~ m28-~ ~~ ~ ~~~"'~~BB 0 ~~~~g c:> 5 .c -e 6.J!! <o1~ .s:: !!l ... Ql :J... 0 ~ ib ~ ~ 0 -5~?~~~~~'~~ ~~~88~~QlQlE ib~lo :E eoo~~>E:J~I~g ~o~g-~>= .2~> <( ~~~~~~e::~.5c 0 ~~.- ~~8 ~ 000>_ >::J::Jo_os...oCU"i::m-c'C cam _<( Oi~Ql~.J!!~ooco~~o~gQl<oi...! ~~oll ~.... _~!~~S~0~~}~~~~~~~s~~~~~~ ~~ o<o,o,oc:l!!c:~~~~~o~~Qloc:E<oo.s::c:o...>~ 00 c ::. J:; ceo (.) 0 c: :!:: :!::: _I _I ~ ;> :> ~ c: 0 f/) >>>>g>gEP.l~QlQl~c:<( ~oE~~~_~~~~~~E:E:E..J..J..J~..J~~<oi~~~E:E ~~~EEE2 ~EETITIE~~~~~~~OO~~~~ibE~~ m~~~<P<Pf/)~.-<P<P<P<Po~I~.~.>~~.~~~~J:;~<P::Jum o~<(~~~c:~:E~~~~u~............~ro....u<(~U)~~w<(w E~ N~~~ ~~ ~ mO~NM~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~------- 2006 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT CITY OF FARMINGTON REVISED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE September 18-21 Remove 2 Y2" of mix from designated areas (16640 SQ) September 22-29 Re-stabilize existing aggregate base and inject fly ash (8%) October 2-6 Adj. manholes, replace gate valves, replace damaged curb October 9-12 Install bituminous non-wearing course October 13-17 Install new valley gutters October 18-26 Install bituminous wearing course October 27-31 Punch list items November 1 COMPLETE .;:: LL \0 0 0 ~ J: ~ I- ~ (l) "C ~ CI) s: (l) ~ CI) ~ ~ (l) r/l c: 0 :E ... ns rn '0 <'V) c::, ~ 0\ -.. ~ <'V) ~ ~ '" '" <t: <t: I I >. >. ~ "S ~ ...... ~ s ~ s ~ <2 e<l <2 e<l .... ~ .... Q) V) ~ Q) 0\ Q) .... -.. 00 -.. ~ 0... f-< ~ 0... f-< OJ}~ .S S ~ t; Q) .;;;; > '" e<l <t: Q) P. I 4-< '" >. 0 ;::l ~ ...... Cd 0 ~ > .~ s ~ ~ <2 e<l El .... Q) ":l- -.. Q) E 00 Q) .... t---. -.. ~ ~ ~ 0... f-< OJ}"S Q) .S S ~ t; Q) ..... > '" ~ e<l <t: ~ P. I >. 0 '" ~ ...... ;::l Cd 0 ~ > .~ s ~ ~ <2 e<l El .... Q) <'V) c::, Q) ..... t---. Q) .... '0 -.. ~ ~ ,D ~ 0... f-< OJ}"S Q) .S S ~ t; Q) ..... > '" ~ e<l <t: Q) P. I 4-< '" >. o ;::l ~ ...... - 0 ~ e<l .~ S ~ > ~ <2 e<l El .... Q) ~ 0\ Q) '0 Q) .... V) -.. -.. ~ E ~ 0... f-< "S OJ} Q) .S S ~ t; Q) .;;;; > '" e<l <t: Q) P. I 4-< '" >. 0 ;::l ~ ...... Cd 0 ~ > .~ s ~ ~ <2 e<l El .... Q) -.. 00 Q) E V) Q) .... ":l- -.. -.. ~ ~ 0... f-< c::, t---. ":l- <'V) -.. -.. ~ c: ~ rn \0 0 :::s .t: 0 l- N ~ "C (1) Q) ~ ~ 0 ~ U Q) .= 0 ... co en "l- ...... co l'-.. ...... "'l "'l C!) ..... I <'$ C/} ~ ;>. '" "'0 ~ '" C!) < ~ ~ 0 <'$ S 0.. ~ 's 0 ~ ~~ 1:l .z () ..... C/} '" :.0 ..... ..... '" () ...... '" .S :Q '" .... ::l C!) "'0 < C!) ..... t:: ;> <'$ g ...... '" C!) <'$ C/} '" ~ ::l <::> <'$ l'-.. \Q ~ ;> <'$ ...... ...... C/} "'l ~ ~ "'l ~ C!) I ..... 8 ~ <'$ 0 C/} ~ "'~ <'$ "'0 '" '" '" C!) ::l C!) ::l C!) ::l C!) '0 C!) 8 '" 8 '" 0 '" () ~ <'$ .... ~ ~ ~ 0....0 .~ ::l .~ .~ 0 0 0 s () () () f:l~ ~ C/} C/} gf ..... '" () :.0 .S :.0 ~ :.0 '" C!) '!:: '!:: ::l "'0 C!) .... C!) C!) :a' ;> C!) ;> <'$ ;> <'$ ;> <'$ < <'$ ...... ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ "'l ~ ~ C!) I ..... 8 ~ <'$ C/} 8 '" <'$ C!) "'0 '" '" '" ..... C!) ::l C!) ::l C!) ;::l C!) - C!) '0 C!) g '" g '" 0 '" ]- () ~ <'$ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. fr..o 's 's 's QJ S 0 0 0 ,Q 0 .€ () .z () .z () 8 u .... ~ .S :.0 gf :.0 gf ..... ..... "'~ () ..0 QJ () '" C!) .!:: '!:: ~ C!) ::l "'0 C!) .... C!) C!) :a' ;> C!) ;> <'$ ;> <'$ ;> <'$ Q "5' < <'$ ...... ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ "'l ~ ~ ~ C!) I ~ 8 ~ C/} 8 ;>. <'$ "'~ "'0 '" ~ '" C!) ;::l C!) < ~ 0 <'$ 0.. 's 0 ~ 's 0 ~ s C!) ~ .z () C!) .z () ..... .... gf ~ gf .~ ..... ..... ..... "'~ () ..0 ...... '" ..0 ...... '" C!) '!:: < C!) ;> <'$ ..... t:: ;> <'$ g < <'$ C!) l'-.. '" 5b "l- CIS C!) ...... '" ~ ;> CIS ...... ~ ~ ...... ~ "'l ~ ~ '" ~ ...... C!) I ..... I ~ CIS C/} ~ 0 ~ ;>. '" "'0 '" ~ '" C!) ::l C!) < .... CIS ~ ~ 0 fr..o .~ 0 ~ 's 0 ~ s () C!) .z () ..... .... ~ gf ~ .s .~ ..... '" () :.0 ...... '" :.0 :Q '" C!) '!:: 3 .... ::l "'0 C!) C!) C!) .... () :a' ;> C!) ;> CIS t:: ;> <'$ g < ~ ~ ~ ~ "'l ;> CIS 0. ~ ...... ...... C/} "'l ~ '" ~ '" "'l 0. -.. co ...... "'l "'l 'i: u. ~ o :E ~ :::s en CIl "en >- co c co 15t5 ...... (1) ~.~ .- D.. E >- co co LLL: ..... (1) o > >-0 ===06 0- :2: co o o C\l --- 0 0 0 ("I") I.{') 0) 0 CO 0 0) C\l C\l ~ 0 ~ I.{') C\l CO ~ I.{') I.{') 0) I'- I'- 0 0 0 0 0) ("I") I.{') '<t C\l CO '<t '<t ~I I.{') I.{') 0 C\l '<t I'- C\l I'- CO ..- CO C\l C\l C\l. 0). I.{'). ("1"). C\l '<t 0). CO C\l I.{') I'- 0) '<t 0) 0) 0 C\l C\l C\l C\l C\l ......... co o 00 I-~ >-1.{') ...... --- 0) Q) 0> "0 CO :::JO ..0 0 "O~ (1)0) CIl...... .> 0> (1) 0:: ~ (1) 1i5 CIlI ......"0 ~Ci5 "0 :::J CO I Y7 000 O~O 000 l!)00 1'-. O. O. C\lC\lC\l COC\l..- ......'<tC\l Y7 00 ~O 00 I.{') I.{') I'-.~ C\lC\l COO ......("1") Y7 00 ~O 00 I.{') I.{') I'-.~ C\lC\l COO ..- ("I") Y7 III Q) :l r::: Q) > Q) e::: CIl ~ (1) C ~ o (1) E"O ~c"O .s..2CCIl (1) ..2 :::J CIl 0> ~ 0 c:Q2(1) (1) ~ CO c EcoSco CIlo6 a; CIl "0 E c.J (1) CO ... (1) ~ 0 .8 "~ <(O::(J)~ o 0 o ~ o 0 I.{') I.{') C\l C\l o ~ o l!) I'- CO 0) I'- o o o o o I.{') CO '<t o o o o o. I.{') CO '<t 0("1") ~I.{') 00 0C\l C\l 0) C\ll!"i o C\l o o o o o o I'- CO o o o o o ("I") I'- ("I") o o I.{') I'- '<to C\l ("I") ("I") CIl C o CIl ~ CO Vi <( I.{')O)O "!~~ 0)("1")1.{') '<tl'-C\l 1.{')("I")C\l 1'-0) o o o l!) ("I") o I'- 00 O~ 00 00 0)1.{') C\l ("I") C\l("l") o o o ("I") o ...... '<t ("I") CO C\l I'- C\l CO CIl ...... '+= (1) I C t5 (1) CO ..0 ~ "0 C C o CO o a; C 0> C o C C n ";:: 5; CIl (1) ~ 2 "~ (1) (1) u;-co... C ~"OJ >- ~ E 'E O:::JC=== 0"0 0 O(J)WOCO<(O III Q) ~ :l :!: "0 c Q) >< w g'co ";:: ~ ~...J "!:: 06 O>c tfj .Q >- o 1\1 ~ o.l::; (1) ~ CIl 0> u; .c C 00 00 00 I'- 0 CO ("I") ("1")1'- ..-("1") I'- 0 CO I.{') '<tl'- o'<t .~ I'- ("I") ("1")("1") CO 0 0) C\l I.{')I.{')O) I'- '<t C\l CO '<t I'- CO ..- '<t 0). '<t 0) C\l C\l 0>- c.J C CO CIl "_ CIl"- "~ "(i.i E ...... ~ ~D..~ (1) D.. (1) >co..c ~." -0 N I'- '<t CO CO 0) C\l ~ o o o l!) I'- CO 0) I'- o o o o o I.{') CO '<t o o o o o. I.{') CO '<t CIl (1) ~ :e "0 C (1) D.. >< W co -0 I- (1) c.J C CO co CO t5 (1) "Q ~ 0... 7a.- COUNCIL MINUTES PRE-MEETING SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Acting Mayor Fogarty at 6:30 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson Soderberg Andrea Poehler, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Brian Lindquist, Interim Police Chief; Lee Mann, Director ofPublic Works/City Engineer; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant 2. APPROVE AGENDA City Attorney recommended tabling the Orderly Annexation Agreement until the next Council Meeting. City Administrator Herlofsky added item 10a) Mill and Overlay Project. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA Councilmember McKnight asked that all bids received be included in the Council packet. He asked about an item on the bills paying the City of Lakeville for patrol services. Interim Police Chief Lindquist noted that was the night of Police Chief Siebenaler' s retirement and through a mutual aid agreement, police from Lakeville covered the City so officers could attend the retirement event. Councilmember McKnight was concerned with removing the Castle Rock Orderly Annexation Agreement from the agenda as this has been a very 10ng process. City Attorney Poehler explained there have been recent changes to the statutes pertaining to annexations and there are a couple steps added to the process. An informational meeting between the City and Castle Rock should be held before the agreement is approved. 5. STAFF COMMENTS City Administrator Herlofsky noted Great River Energy will be clearing a 70 ft. wide easement through Rambling River Park tomorrow. Council Minutes (Pre-Meeting) September 5,2006 Page 2 6. ADJOURN MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto adjourn at 6:36 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, ~F7~ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Acting Mayor Fogarty at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Acting Mayor Fogarty led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Audience: Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson Soderberg Andrea Poehler, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Brian Lindquist, Interim Police Chief; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Bryce 0lson, Lacelle Cordes, Fred Alstrom, Dave Steinke, Peggy Backes, Lois Meyer, Scott & Lauren Graham, Nick Schultz, Gary Pipho, Bill Leysen, Richard & Mary Swanson, Jerry & Denise Ristow 4. APPROVE AGENDA City Attorney Poehler pulled item lla) Castle Rock Orderly Annexation Agreement to hold an informational meeting prior to approval. City Administrator Herlofsky added item 10a) Mill and Overlay Project. MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS a) Introduce Promoted Employee - Public Works City Engineer Mann introduced Todd Reiten who was promoted to Assistant Director Public Works. 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS Ms. Lacelle Cordes, 1405 Lower Heritage Way, attended a Council Workshop last week and the audience was told by Acting Mayor Fogarty that there would be no citizen comments taken and that it was Council policy. Ms. Cordes served on the Council for eight years and she found no policy where citizen participation is unwelcome at a Council workshop. There is a policy from 1998 for participation at Council Meetings and public hearings. She suggested something be in writing as to what the policy and procedure is. Council Minutes (Regular) September 5, 2006 Page 2 7. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approved Council Minutes (8/21/06 Regular) b) Approved Appointment Recommendation Finance - Human Resources c) Approved Appointment Recommendation Finance - Human Resources d) Approved Appointment Recommendation Finance - Human Resources e) Acknowledged Resignation Finance - Human Resources f) Received Information School and Conference - Parks and Recreation g) Received Information Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation h) Received Information Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation i) Adopted RESOLUTION R99-06 Accepting Donation Rambling River Center- Parks and Recreation Acting Mayor Fogarty thanked the Kuyper family for their donation. Adopted RESOLUTION RIOO-06 Accepting Donation Youth Scholarship Program - Parks and Recreation Acting Mayor Fogarty thanked FY AA for this donation acknowledging the work of Robin Hanson. Approved GIS Contract - Community Development Adopted RESOLUTION RIOI-06 Approving 208th Street W Parking Restrictions - Engineering Received Information Rescheduled 2006 Mill and Overlay Project Assessment Hearing - Engineering Adopted RESOLUTION RI02-06 Approving Vermillion Trail 15t Addition Development Contract - Engineering 0) Approved School and Conference - Community Development p) Approved Bills APIF, MOTION CARRIED. j) k) 1) m) n) 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) 2006 Seal Coat Project Assessment Hearing - Engineering The 2006 seal coat project is complete. The total project cost is $145,700. The proposed assessment amount is $52.94 per residential equivalent unit. The total amount to be assessed to benefiting properties is $72,850. The City's portion of the project cost is $72,850 and will be funded through the Street Construction and Maintenance fund. Mr. Dave Kennedy, 312 Maple Street, received a letter advising him that Maple Street in front of his house would be seal coated between 3rd Street and 4th Street. His street was not seal coated and he asked what the status is and will he be assessed. City Engineer Mann replied there are streets in the seal coat area that are reviewed each spring to determine if they need to be seal coated. Each year streets are removed where seal coating is no 10nger appropriate. This is likely what happened, but staff will verify it. In this case, residents along that portion of the street would not be assessed. Council Minutes (Regular) September 5,2006 Page 3 MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Wilson asked when a street is removed from the schedule it is because it falls into a category where it might be in line for a different project. City Engineer Mann replied it does not fall off the books. It is eligible for some other type of project such as mill and overlay or full reconstruct in the future. Councilmember Pritzlaffnoted the amount is 50% to the residents and 50% to the City. City Engineer Mann replied that is the City policy. MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to adopt RESOLUTION R103-06 adopting the assessment roll for the 2006 Seal Coat project. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 9. A WARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Mill and Overlay Project - Engineering The purpose of doing the mill and overlay project in the Sunnyside and Chateau Manor areas was to improve the road and the drainage. During the process, it was found the condition of the road was not as good as expected. The roads need to have 4" of asphalt put on so they last another 10 years. The original bid was $373,000. If the project were completed based on the original assumptions the cost would be $464,000. Additional work needs to be done and the City has to determine how to pay for it. Staff proposed to freeze the cost at the original amount and find an alternative so residents can be charged the original amount. If Council is willing to keep the original cost, staff will research options on how to pay the additional amount. The other issue is the appearance of the new curb. In 2-3 years this should go away and will not be an issue. The new curb will have the same coloring as the old curb. To replace all the curb would raise the amount of the project to $747,208. Staff does not consider this structural. It is aesthetic. Staff does not anticipate this happening on too many other streets. Councilmember McKnight asked how this impacts previous assessments or future assessments for similar projects. He asked if the City had any liability from the past or in the future. City Attorney Poehler replied no. The City can take each project individually, but it is best if a policy is set. Councilmember Wilson noted there were contingency dollars for this project and asked if those have been exhausted. City Engineer Mann replied yes. Councilmember Wilson asked if there would be some type of liability when a contractor is bidding on a project that they are assuming the risks might be greater than or less than the final project costs and would the contractor absorb the price. Council Minutes (Regular) September 5,2006 Page 4 Staff replied the items the contractor is bidding on are laid out and they bid on the quantity. If additional items need to be included, the contractor is not liable. Councilmember Pritzlaffnoted the original cost was $373,000. At that point there was 27% engineering, administration, and legal fees. He asked if the 27% is included in the $747,000 to finish the project. Staffreplied the original estimated cost for construction was the $373,000. Adding on the engineering, legal, and administration staff would have to refer to the feasibility report. There may also have been a 10% contingency on top of that. The numbers being presented do not include the 27%. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated when the original cost was $373,000, the 27% amounted to $98,000. So will the cost be 27% more than the $747,000. Staffreplied no. Councilmember Pritzlaffwanted the $747,000 to be the last figure he saw for this project. Staff noted the 27% is not an engineering fee. It is a number used to estimate the engineering, legal and administration costs on all projects. On a large project these fees may come close to 27%. On a mill and overlay project, staff did not anticipate coming close to the 27%. The 27% is not a fee that is charged, it is an estimating device. The numbers in the documents are construction only. At the Council Workshop, residents asked several questions. Councilmember Pritzlaff did not agree with the Centennial Circle answer. It was not part of the proj ect to change the height of the road. He did not agree that 8" of asphalt is stronger than 3" of asphalt and 6" of base. He would like the driveways dug out where this was done. He would also like the driveways done consistently. They should be cut at the natural cut. Mr. Dave Steinke, 1412 Lower Heritage Way, stated he is hearing them talking about basically reconstructing Lower Heritage Way. A couple years ago he had a sewer backup due to the 8" main in the street being plugged. At their last resort they managed to get it cleared. If the street is rebuilt he asked what that will do to the schedule to rebuild the street and sewer and water system in 10 years. If it is done now, will the City not dig up the street in 10 years for the reconstruction? He has a 10t of concerns about the sewer and water system. It has affected how he uses the basement on a daily basis. He has been told the City's maintenance program will take care of it. Mr. Steinke stated the maintenance program did not take care of it in the first place. Why should he believe it will take care of it in the future? He has not received any information that anything different is being done to prevent this from happening again. If the street is reconstructed now, will the sewer lines be repaired where there is a known issue now? He asked who is accountable for saying that 70-80% of the curb will be replaced rather than 50%. It smells of a runaway project and not very good management. Several people need to be held accountable. His sewer backup was in February 2004 and he was told it was a solid mass of tree roots blocking the pipe. He found it hard to believe an 8" pipe could become a solid mass of tree roots in 3 years time. He seriously doubted the previous inspection done 3 years earlier. City Engineer Mann stated if there are one or two spots in the sewer line that need attention that Council Minutes (Regular) September 5, 2006 Page 5 can be done. Staff anticipates another 10 years out of the sewer and water lines before a reconstruction is needed. Mr. Scott Graham, 509 Lower Heritage Way, stated he is hearing a full reconstruct is not needed now. Isn't that what this project was about in the first place? We did not need a full reconstruct and now we do. He would rather deal with the problem now. The manhole cover is sticking up in front of his driveway. He did not understand how they got to this point. He sees two other blocks in the same neighborhood where the streets are in the same condition and they are not being redone. Why not? Does it go back to the rating system? Mr. Jeff Thelen, 616 Lower Heritage Way, asked ifthere has been additional engineering tests done since last Thursday to determine what the conditions of the streets are. The reason we are in the mess that we are is because there was no prior test borings done and we had no idea what we were getting into. Now we are recommending a cure, but have there been any test borings done to say we can remove the blacktop and subsoil and be done, or will we find out once we remove the subsoil that there is just garbage under that. Has there been any additional testing done? Mr. Thelen asked who is doing the engineering on this project? Is this the City's own engineer or are we relying on Bonestroo, the consulting engineer. He thought the person doing the work was the Assistant City Engineer. In his business he is the guy at the top ofthe ladder, so when something goes bad, he does not point at everyone else down there and say I don't take responsibility for this. Ifwe are hiring Bonestroo to be the lead engineer, they better start taking some responsibility for this, because they have left the City owing many, many hundreds ofthousands of dollars because somebody screwed up. He sees this as an engineering fault, not just a little quirk that somebody 35 years ago built the road with only 1.5" ofblacktop. This is an engineering disaster. Mr. Jerry Ristow, 516 Lower Heritage Way, stated he did a 10t of research on this proj ect. He asked staff for the mill and overlay proj ects and assured Council the road did not need construction. Will the residents end up paying $985 for a road that met City standards that never had to be done to begin with according to City standards? He asked Council at the time if they were familiar with the Pavement Management Study and they were, yet they tore the road up. Now the residents are sitting with a 10t of money to be paid. He thanked Councilmember Pritzlaff for taking the initiative to come out and actually see it and also Councilmember McKnight. This is a serious problem and also for the City, we are all taxpayers. His taxes went up 26.5% from the City. He does not even want to pay the $985 because he feels they do not have to. This was ajob where the roads met the City standards and now they are tom up and the residents could be paying more. Who will pay the additional cost? Maybe there should be some engineering insurance for tearing up a road that did not need it. Lower Heritage Way was supposedly the presenter to all the roads. You could overlay Lower Heritage Way right now. There is nothing wrong with it. The other roads have the big potholes. Council Minutes (Regular) September 5,2006 Page 6 Councilmember McKnight asked City Administrator Herlofsky if with his proposal the assessment level would be based off of the $373,000 or $446,000. City Administrator Herlofsky stated the $373,000 was construction so whatever the actual engineering is, probably less than $100,000 would be the base for the assessment to residents. The full depth mill with class 5 saving the good areas and all new curb would cost $747,208. City Administrator Herlofsky added or the $609,708 which does not include the curb. Councilmember McKnight stated using the larger number staff is 100king at making up from City funds the $374,000 difference. The project has to be done now as we have a limited time line. It is horrible. He agreed with the residents and he is very disappointed. The accountability has to take place right now and he needs some help financially. This is his pocketbook too. He would like to do the curb because it 100ks horrible with 60% replaced, but it is an expensive price tag at $140,000 to replace the curb. Councilmember Pritzlaffstated out ofthe $374,000 what portion would come from the storm water fund. City Administrator Herlofsky stated that would have to be discussed. No one is pleased with where this project is. It has to be finished and we have to do the work to determine the costs. This is putting the Council in a very difficult position. It is really not a reconstruction. The Hill Dee project is a total reconstruction and is considerably more. This is a fix-up, not a major reconstruction. The televising of the utilities show there is still some life left in them. The City has an investment made and we need to determine what the best value is that we can get. Councilmember Pritzlaffwould like to go back to engineering and see some help from their insurance. What if we take up the rest ofthe asphalt and the base is terrible? Are we going to put down the bare minimum and get by? City Engineer Mann stated the section staff is proposing, except in the areas where the pavement is still good and could be overlayed, is more of a section that was put there originally. Many of the sections did not have any gravel underneath at all. Staff is proposing a minimum of 6" of gravel under all areas, except for the roadway that has been milled and the pavement is still structurally sound. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated out of this whole project it sounds like there is a road, maybe more than one, that we will just overlay. City Engineer Mann replied there are areas on the map shown last Thursday where the pavement is still solid and could be overlayed and would last for 10-15 years. Acting Mayor Fogarty asked about the cost to do borings. Staff replied that could be done and costs would have to be determined. Councilmember McKnight asked about the timeframe if Council said tonight to complete the project. City Engineer Mann replied the earliest the milling machine could come in to finish the milling would be September 11, 2006, and staff has been guaranteed by September 18, 2006. If Council wants all the curb replaced, that would change the schedule. Councilmember McKnight asked if changing the curb meant ripping up the new curb and staring over or replacing the curb that has not been replaced? City Engineering Mann replied it would be replacing the Council Minutes (Regular) September 5,2006 Page 7 sections that have not been replaced. Councilmember McKnight asked what that does for the health of the curb. Staff did not feel that was a major issue as the grade is already set. City Engineer Mann commented on the subsoils and doing borings, it was the pavement conditions that led to the project. Staffhas not seen major heaving issues that would lead staff to believe there are other issues, as 10ng as they get the street section in. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked if the timeline includes the contractor replacing 50% of the curb due to chipping from the mill and overlay machine and strictly at his cost. Staff explained that time frame is when the milling machine would be able to come back. As far as how long it will take after that, staff will have to review that. As far as what sort of curb and valley gutter replacement needs to occur, staff will need to determine that. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked if it was in writing from the contractor that the driveways were incidental. Staff noted it is in the specification contract signed by the contractor. It did not make sense to Councilmember Pritzlaff that a contractor would be doing this amount of concrete driveways and not have a way to recoup the costs, and now replacing the curb that has been damaged. He was leery this would come back for more money. Councilmember Wilson stated he took from the information from engineering that the road was in the condition that it needed to be repaired, and that it deteriorated from the 2003 pavement study. He would not like to explore any ofthese options and then have a future Councillook at this same type of situation and have residents come back saying why didn't you reconstruct the road at that time. The telescoping has suggested the piping 100ks good. It would be nice to know in addition to the dollars ifthere are any pro's and con's to looking at these options. Councilmember Fogarty stated she voted for the project and doing back to back assessments because she thought they were going to save the residents money in the 10ng run. Given the information she has now, she would not have voted for the project, but we have to fix this. She wanted to make sure we fix it right so it does last the 10-15 years the residents have been told. She was adamant the individual assessments not be more than the residents were originally told. She was also struggling with the aesthetics of the curb. Staff needs direction, but she was uncomfortable they did not know where they would come up with $250,000 - $375,000. She did not know how to vote when she does not have the answer to that question. Councilmember McKnight stated if we are going to do something we need to do it right. That is the only reason he would support doing the curb. He does not want to be back here. He suggested approving the $747,000 unless the residents do not want it. Mr. Jeff Thelen stated the roads are 35 years old. The residents did not want the project. They wanted basic maintenance and fix the potholes. These roads have lasted with the base that is there for 35 years and it has been a good road with Council Minutes (Regular) September 5,2006 Page 8 basic maintenance and probably under-maintained. He asked what would happen if they rip out the blacktop that is there on all the roads and put blacktop over the existing base. If they have lasted 35 years, why can't we expect 10-15 years with a 2-3" lift ofblacktop. City Engineer Mann replied the recommendation is to put in more of the standard street section in order to ensure that through this process we end up with a road that will last 10-15 years. At this point we would not suggest putting in a section that is sub-standard. As far as aesthetics, Mr. Thelen felt $140,000 extra for a whiter curb was not worth it. It was his thinking from the beginning that paying a $985 assessment for whiter curbs and blacker streets was insane and Council voted for the project anyway. At this point Mr. Thelen cannot see forcing this expense down the throats of the remainder of the taxpayers. If there is anyone to 100k at for additional funds, we should 100k at the engineering. If those roads have lasted 35 years with the existing base, rip up the blacktop, put down as good a base as you can and we will see in 10-15 years. He suggested putting the preservative over all the curbing. If the project needs to be done up to standards, then the consulting engineer should be liable. Councilmember Wilson would rather spend the $446,000 as opposed to another $163,000 to get the full depth mill and another $300,000 to replace all the curbing. Ifwe go from $373,000 to $446,000 and the road deteriorates in 5 years we will have a 10t of problems. City Engineer Mann replied the $446,000 is not an option. That is a basis for comparison as to what the additional curb costs and the additional milling costs. The $609,000 and the $747,000 are the only two options. Councilmember Wilson suggested the $609,000. Councilmember Pritzlaffasked on the $609,000 how do we know how much class 5 we will put down to come up with the $609,000 and when it says saving good areas, is that good areas of the subsoil or good areas of the asphalt. He had a problem going through this whole project and leaving one road milled especially when that is the road that made this project come to a head. City Engineer Mann replied based on an individual who has done many mill and overlays throughout his career, he indicated on that road the pavement is solid, it was milled appropriately, and to overlay it would last 10-15 years. As far as how do we know how much class 5 we need, we estimated it based on 6" which is City standard. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated he cannot wait to make a decision, we need to get the road done. We willlook at where the accountability stands, but in the meantime the project needs to move forward. Reluctantly he recommended the $609,000 option. Mr. Jerry Ristow stated if they do not tear out the existing old curb, staff should at least ask the contractor to spray the old curb along with the new curb. Staff stated that has been attempted in other cities and it does not work very well. The cure that is sprayed on sticks to the new concrete as it is setting up and it does not stick to the old concrete. The cost is 25 cents a foot. Council Minutes (Regular) September 5, 2006 Page 9 Ms. Lacelle Cordes stated we will pay for it in the end anyway. If it is not a direct assessment our taxes will increase along with everyone else's. The unfortunate thing is this project should have never been done. It should have waited the 10-15 years the City is hoping to get out of the new road. We should have waited 7 years and redone it all. Councilmember Fogarty agreed the aesthetics is not worth it to the overall taxpayer. Over time it willlook even. She was still struggling with not knowing where this money is coming from. She would like to see some soil borings done to make sure this is all we are getting into. MOTION by Pritzlaffto move forward with the $609,000 option, the full depth mill with class 5 and saving good areas. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated ifhe had the information then that he has now, he would not have voted for this project. He gave the residents his word that they will be checking into the engineering. Mr. Scott Graham, stated he heard Council does not want the residents to be assessed more. He agreed we need to move forward but is Council saying the residents will not be assessed more. Councilmember Fogarty stated that direction has been given to staff. They are 100king at road and bridge funds or possibly storm sewer. Regarding soil borings, a full depth boring is 20-30 ft. and if you have a 10t they are $500 each. In this case they will not be that deep and there will not be that many. Staff would have to come up with a cost, but there is evidence those roads have stayed put over the years. He did not recommend doing borings every 10ft. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated his motion would be without soil borings. Councilmember Wilson stated the $609,708 is an estimated amount. They are voting on an estimated amount which could go up or down and we are uncertain as to which dollar amounts are coming from which fund. He wanted the project done, but there is uncertainty as to what to do with the money. He asked to amend the motion to not to exceed $609,708 and ifit goes beyond that, the liability is not borne by taxpayers. Councilmember Fogarty asked what time frame it would take to nail down the finances. City Administrator Herlofsky stated at the next meeting staff will have recommendations on financing. Councilmember Fogarty suggested not adjourning the meeting and continuing it to the near future to obtain better numbers. Councilmember McKnight felt Council' s financial concerns are more the liability of the additions. We work with estimates all the time. He does not have time to wait to order the project. They need to order it tonight and continue to work on who is paying for it. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve the $609,000 option for the full depth mill with class 5 and save the good areas, without doing soil borings. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Council Minutes (Regular) September 5, 2006 Page 10 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Adopt Resolution - Castle Rock Orderly Annextion Agreement - Community Development This item was tabled until the September 18, 2006 Council Meeting. 12. NEWBUSINESS a) Adopt Resolution - 2007 Preliminary Tax Levy and Budget - Finance City Administrator Herlofsky presented the highlights of the 2007 budget. The preliminary levy is $8,176,780. This is a 22% adjustment over 2006. The general fund is increasing by 21 %. The City's tax base reflects an increase of26% over 2006 due to a TIF district being decertified. The gross tax capacity value has increased by 13.2%, so the net tax capacity value is 23.3%. General fund revenues are estimated at $8.7 million with 73% from property taxes. There is no levy limit in 2007. Expenditures in the general fund are proposed to increase by 12.6% over 2006. This includes capital outlay. Capital Outlay was not included in the 2006 budget. The Dakota County Communications dispatch will cost $250,000. In the 2007 budget there is $317,000 in capital outlay expenses. There is only one additional staff position going from a half-time to full-time communications specialist. Other requests were not included in the proposal. Revenues in the general fund have 73% coming from taxes, permits and licensing has been reduced by $100,000. The total proposed revenues are at 12.6% and this matches expenses. Increases in expenses are due to capital outlay and to update computers. As far as the tax rate, there is no change from 2006 and it remains at 43.34%. The growth in the community and the reduction in TIP has resulted in being able to maintain the rate and still increase the levy. The City's portion of taxes payable will increase approximately $60 on a median value home. Councilmember McKnight noted the summary talks about the County's estimated increase on a tax base of 13%. He would like to have that broken down between new growth and value increases. He does not believe in his house being a higher value being considered as growth. Councilmember McKnight asked what kind of support is included for Rambling River Days. City Administrator Herlofsky replied the committee has not requested any dollar amount. There is $2500 left over from prior years in the Parks and Recreation budget. The biggest issue addressed by the committee is that the City provides staff assistance during Rambling River Days to alleviate some of the work done by volunteers. Staffwill determine which staff members would be most appropriate. Councilmember McKnight stated his personal request is also financial and to continue to work with that group. He noted the building permit revenue has been reduced from $825,000 in 2006 to $756,250 in 2007. He asked what the 2007 number is based on. City Administrator Herlofsky stated he would have to check on the actual number of permits. Councilmember McKnight wants it based on a realistic number. We cannot continue to miss that number. In the budget work session he said he could support a conservative levy increase. The first being replenishing the fund balance and starting a pIan to do that. This budget does not do that which is a huge concern to him. The budget goes up which means the percentage Council Minutes (Regular) September 5, 2006 Page 11 of fund balance to budget goes down. He cannot support this type of levy increase without starting to deal with the fund balance. This is his first priority. City Administrator Herlofsky replied the first step is to have a balanced budget. Staff could spend 97% of our expenditures and if we have 100% ofthe revenues, we will pick up $250,000. That has been the issue the last couple years with building permits not matching up. You end up with fund balance surpluses at the end of the year by managing budget expenditures throughout the year. Councilmember McKnight agreed but in the last two years we have had an emergency and we have not had a realistic budget number in a couple places that have caused the end of the year balance to be negative. Councilmember Wilson noted in the 2005 auditor's report two goals the Council needs to work on is the fund balance and the investment policy. In 2005 there was an 18% reserve, in 2006 it was 16.6%, in 2007 proposed is 14.6%. We are going the wrong direction. We have significant projects we are moving forward on which were started with the previous Council, one being the Fire Station which was completed and City Hall which will be started next year. His concern as it relates to the fund balance is the City's bond rating and the adverse affects that happen in the marketplace with such a 10w fund balance. The 43.34% for the tax capacity rate does not address the competitiveness of Farmington relative to our neighbors. He was not comfortable with the initial proposal. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated the fund balance is a priority. He asked what the previous number was for building permits. Council stated it was 350 or 300. He was concerned that the City will not hit those projections. He felt the projection of$756,000 needed to be 10wered. He asked if we are overstaffed and can we be more efficient and have more done with less people. We need to 100k at what more we can do to drop the amount of money we need. Councilmember McKnight does not want these numbers as a basis for the truth- in-taxation statements that the residents would receive. He cannot support this kind of increase. This has to be to the County by September 15, 2006. He suggested continuing the meeting to allow staff a few more days to work on this number. Councilmember Fogarty stated she cannot approve this, as she was not comfortable with the numbers. She was very concerned about the fund balance. We have to have a pIan and she did not feellike there was a pIan included in the budget. She was concerned about building permits, as three years in a row they have come up short. She felt that number needed to be cut further. She suggested continuing this meeting to work on the numbers. Councilmember McKnight gave staff credit for the work done so far. MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto continue this item to September 14, 2006 at 5:30 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Council Minutes (Regular) September 5,2006 Page 12 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Interim Police Chief Lindquist: The City received a letter from a resident who is a parent of seven children and misplaced one of them. Officer Sundvall helped the mother search for the missing child. The parent was extremely happy the officer took his time to help her. 14. ADJOURN MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto adjourn at 8:45 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, /,~ ~ /--7 r / , &-/ J;v~~c~ )1?~-</ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant Council Workshop Minutes Mill and Overlay Project August 31, 2006 Acting Mayor Fogarty called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Absent: Also Present: Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff Soderberg, Wilson Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Lee Mann, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Mary and Richard Swanson, Jerry and Denise Ristow, Jeff Thelen, Jerry Benoit, David Pietsch, Bob and Anita Doll, Peggy Backes, Lois Meyer, Mark Ford, Burt Gus, Dave Steinke, Bryan Hildreth, Rita Peltier, Barbara Routhier, Kris Alberts, Barb Hawkinson, Deb and Rich Regemitter, Vicki Pepera, Ken Kuchera, Adamson, Fred Alstrom, Pete Gerten, Robert Lane, Scott and Lauren Graham, Tim Carey, Dan Cuka, Brian Kempenich, Don Hunter, Brian Klutz, Brett and Cheri Roegiers, David Truax, Susan Welch, Sam and Paulette Huston, Mike Morton, Lacelle Cordes Audience: Councilmember Pritzlaff asked that public comments be added to the agenda. Acting Mayor Fogarty noted generally Council does not take public comments at workshops. There has been a public hearing and there will be a Council Meeting on September 5, 2006 ifthere are any changes, public comments can be taken then. Councilmember McKnight stated he did not have a problem with taking public comments. Acting Mayor Fogarty agreed to add public comments to the agenda, but they needed to contain new information. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve the agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. The purpose ofthe workshop was to discuss the status of the mill and overlay project in the Chateau Manor and Sunnyside areas and issues that have arisen. The roads in these areas are 35- 40 years old. City Engineer Mann provided an update on the conditions of the streets since the milling started. Staffhas encountered some conditions that were not anticipated. It was anticipated to mill off 1" of pavement and find 3-4" of existing pavement and in a solid enough condition to overlay that would last 10-15 years. Staff has found the pavement in the area varies significantly from 2" to 6". In some areas the condition of the pavement after milling is in a condition that it cannot be overlayed. In some areas the milling pulled up the pavement to the base below. City Engineer Mann presented a map showing streets constructed in 1965 (yellow on the map). At that time there was 1.5" of bituminous placed on the streets with 6" of class 5 and 4" of class 4 aggregate base. Current standards are a bare minimum of 3.5",4" or 5" depending on the type of development and the type of road being built. The 1.5" is an amount of asphalt that would not be able to be milled and overlayed. There may be some areas in these streets due to patching over the years may have more than that, but that varied. Some other streets (green on the map) were built in 1968. In this area there was 1.5" of wearing asphalt and 2.5" of base asphalt, so there was a total of 4" which is closer to City standard, however, there was not aggregate base placed under the asphalt. The asphalt was put directly on the existing ground after the area was graded. Other streets (in pink on the map) were built in 1970 which have 5" of asphalt without any aggregate base below the asphalt. Streets built in 1972 (orange on the map) have 4" of asphalt with no aggregate base below the asphalt. Council Workshop Minutes August 31, 2006 Page 2 Staff has done an analysis of what the records show and what they found in the streets and have a solution to the situation. On most of the streets either there is not enough asphalt to overlay on top of, or the asphalt has deteriorated to a state where it is not recommended to overlay what is left. The areas in pink on the map where there was 5" of asphalt have enough asphalt left and it is in a condition where it could be overlayed. The original bid was $373,000. Due to additional curb being removed and additional patching the cost of the project would be $446,500. In 100king at the options, for much of the pavement, a full depth mill will be needed in areas where there is no gravel base. A class 5 base will be needed under the new pavement. Staff also reviewed whether to save the good areas (in pink on the map). Options are as follows: Option 1 is a full depth mill which would mill the street and put the asphalt back on whatever base is there. The total project cost would be $651,300. Option 2 is a full depth mill of all areas and to add class 5 to all areas to have a consistent 6" of class 5 aggregate base. The cost would be $729,900. Option 3 is a full depth mill and save the areas that are able to be overlayed. This cost would be $562,200. Option 4 is a full depth mill and add class 5 that have not had class 5 before and saving those areas with the good pavement to be overlayed. The cost would be $609,700. Stafffeels it is not in the City's best interest to repave over areas that do have aggregate underneath. The areas in pink on the map are able to take the overlay and be acceptable. Therefore, staff recommended option 4. Staff needs to advise the contractor by the end of the week how the proj ect should move forward. The contractor could try to have the mill in by September 11, but guarantee it will be in by September 18, 2006. City Administrator Herlofsky stated staff has to inform the contractor how to proceed and come back with a recommendation regarding the assessments to find a fair and appropriate way to treat this area and any other areas in the future. Mr. Fred Alstrum, 1408 Lower Heritage Way, suggested instead ofhauling in class 5 use the asphalt that was ground off for the base. The engineers researched that option and found it would cost more to grind up the asphalt and mix it with the material underneath than to shape it and haul it in. Ms. Lacelle Cordes, 1405 Lower Heritage Way, one of the issues she has is when the curb and gutter work was done they did 90% and left 10%. If they were going to do that much, why not just finish the job. Councilmember Fogarty stated in the original estimate, they estimated 1/3 to Yz so it is more than they expected to have to do. Ms. Cordes stated they left the neighborhood 100king hideous. They have a patchwork of old and new. She has 35 ft. of new, 5 ft. of old, 10 ft. of new, 5 ft. of old. The portions left were in the worse condition. She would like staff to 100k at making it all new if that can be done. Also, when they tore up driveways, they took out a portion of the end of the driveway to put in the new entrance and made her driveway worse than it was before. The driveway had cracks previously, but they are bigger now. What compensation do they have for that? They did not want the project to begin with. The road was Council Workshop Minutes August 31, 2006 Page 3 not bad. There may have been an area on one road that needed some patchwork, but the road was fine. Mr. JeffThelen, 616 Lower Heritage Way, heard that early on some of the citizens were not concerned about the project. He has been at every meeting including the first workshop in February. At that first workshop there were only two people here, but they were adamant that we were against the project and we insisted we did not need it. The City Engineer insisted that it was necessary and he spoke about the road ratings and how the roads are rated from 0 to 100. All along the residents were assuming the ratings were 10w enough to warrant the project as it was stated. At the other meetings, he has not heard one citizen that commented that they were in favor of this project. Every comment Council heard was everybody did not want the project to proceed. They were happy with the roads considering the age they are and knowing the road will last another 10 years, let's wait for the 10 years and then do the total reconstruct. Never has Council heard a comment from residents in this area that they were asking for this project. Now we have the mess and we have to deal with it, but it is not because residents have requested any additional service on the road other than normal maintenance. Mr. Pete Gerten, 707 Centennial Circle, attended the meeting in March when the project was approved, and he was totally against it. At that time, he knew nothing about the curb being done, but was told at the meeting the estimates were worse case scenarios. Where did that figure come from? Did we not check the condition of the road before we said it was worse case scenario? That was supposed to be the maximum assessment and the maximum cost. Now the tables have turned. He feels someone is liable. He did not want the project. None of his neighbors wanted the project. In Centennial Circle there was not even a crack in the circle and now everyone's driveways are in worse condition than when they started. They have a mess. Someone is liable whether it is engineering, the contractor, or Council. Mr. Dave Steinke, 1412 Lower Heritage Way, stated he keeps hearing 1" or 1.5" on the mill and overlay that they were going to grind off. Having watched them do that, there was more than that taken offin a 10t of the areas. He felt 2" to 3" was removed and in some places 4" was removed. There is an existing ridge in the pavement now where it is close to 4" where it was cut. Maybe the contractor went too deep and that is part of what is causing the bear spots. There was considerably more than 1" to 1.5" taken off on Lower Heritage Way. Ms. Deb O'Donnell, 505 Heritage Way, wanted to address the financial concerns with the additional expense and reviewing the financial options available afterwards. Every resident has an investment either financial or frustration wise the last few months and felt they should have an option to make some decisions as to where their tax money is going, what kind of funds our City and County can offer to take some of the burden off the residents. We are not the poorest County out there and she truly believes there has to be some funds to help absorb this. We cannot put the paving back, but residents can certainly make some decisions about where their money goes and how much they can expect from the City. The City has a budget with costs, tables and demographic information and she would like to know if residents can have that. Mr. Scott Graham, 509 Lower Heritage Way, stated they have all listened to this and have been put in a position where a proj ect was thrust upon them they did not want. He has not heard anyone say we need our streets milled. They have done half a job with removing curbs and gutters. Some are done and some are not done. The rain has run under the pieces of curbing and Council Workshop Minutes August 31,2006 Page 4 he asked if there is a guarantee from the contractor that when those areas settle, will they replace them? He has not heard anything about that. When the road buckles because the water has run underneath it will it be replaced? They do not hear anything about that and they are getting assessed for this. No one wanted the project, why have we done it and why isn't it being done the right way from the start. Mr. Jerry Ristow, 516 Lower Heritage Way, stated he has been to four or five of the meetings, pleading with Council to do their homework before the project began. He does not believe that was done. He was at the July 3,2006 meeting and gave the information to Council after staff had given it to him. He does not believe Council was informed on this, they did not know what they were doing when the project was approved. City Engineer Mann mentioned the maps and wished he would have shown where the bad spots are. Heritage Way was the worst road and Mr. Ristow, Councilmember Pritzlaff and Councilmember Wilson were told you could take a pitchfork and dig it out. According to the map, Heritage Way is one of the better roads. Then stafflooked at the road and when it was built. This should have been done beforehand, not now. It is too late in the game. We have a mess and if we have three or four days of rain we will have a mud hole. He gave the three Councilmembers in attendance credit for the initiative to 100k at this. Councilmember Pritzlaffhas been in the area many, many times and met with the neighbors. We need to get the road fixed. It is serious now. He pleaded with Council before to wait another five or six years and they could have done a complete mill. Now we need a complete mill. To haul the grave 1 in, it will be up to $6,000 where before the assessment was $985. He has all the documents, the pavement management study and the updated study. The roads were in the acceptable range when Council voted for the project. Heritage Way was at 84.5 and he was at the July 3,2006 meeting addressing that. On July 6,2006 it went from 84 down to 7.79. Other roads in the same study are in worse shape. He does not know how people are driving on them today, if staff was so worried about their roads. Some Councilmembers made a comment that the project was delayed in 2005 and they could not think about delaying it another year. Council needs to 100k at the residents. They just paid $400 last year and now they are 100king at $1,000 this year. He suggested the engineering firm may have insurance that can help out. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated one of his concerns is the feasibility study originally estimated the project cost at $464,468. The new number as of today is $446,000. Also it was stated at the April 3, 2006 Council meeting 1/3 to 12 of the curb was budgeted. Ifwe budgeted for 1/3 to 12 how come we have 75-80% of the curb replaced and we are still not up to the original estimated cost on the feasibility study. City Engineer Mann replied the feasibility report costs have three components. The first is the actuallist of items and their estimated bid prices. On top of that cost there is a 10% contingency. That gives the estimated construction costs. The third part is 27% is added to cover engineering, legal and administrative expenses. The cost today covers the construction costs. $373,000 was the bid amount based on the quantities in the bid. The second number is based on the quantities received to date with the additional curb identified. The engineering cost is not shown in those numbers yet. That number is not yet final. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked ifhe should 100k at a 27% increase for engineering, legal and administrative costs. Staff replied not necessarily. The 27% is a budgeting number to be consistent with all projects. In some cases it is more or less. City Administrator Herlofsky stated the 27% is not a consultant fee. It is only used to estimate the cost. In this case the project had very little consultant participation. The project was originally assigned to the previous Council Workshop Minutes August 31, 2006 Page 5 Assistant City Engineer and his costs and hourly rates would have been charged to the project rather than the consultant. A very small portion of the 27% would be Bonestroo. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated the second area he had a question on was the ratings of the road. The pavement management study, which he feels he should have had in February or March when they 100ked at this project, shows that in 2003 the worst road was Heritage Way from TH3 to Lower Heritage Way and was at 62.3. From there it goes up to 67.56 on Sunnyside Drive. Everything after that is in the 70's and 80's. The categories are 0-35,35-55, and 55-95. Ifhe would have had these numbers, he would not have thought they needed a mill and overlay. Then he received an updated study where the roads were re-rated on October 12, 2005. Some numbers dropped and some are the same. The road was rated again on July 6, 2006. He asked how many people were already working on that project and what type of work was done in July. City Engineer Mann replied he did not believe the proj ect started yet when the roads were re-rated. He understood the previous project manager sent out an intern to re-rate the project so they would have the data for the records. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated when Lower Heritage Way was re-rated on July 6,2006 it was rated at 27.05. That falls below what a mill and overlay would have done to this road. He understood that once the contract was awarded he could not pull it back. Had he seen this number, he would have pulled the contract. The rating should have been less than or equal to 35 for a reconstruct or full depth asphalt. Before they start pulling curb, he receives information that this road does not warrant a mill and overlay. He would have said to wait and do a road reconstruct. He has issues as to when and how this came to him and how one particular road can drop in 10 months from 71.88 to 27.05. With that type of rating drop, what goes into rating these roads and why did we not know what we were dealing with. In rating the roads, why didn't we know what we know today? City Engineer Mann stated staff will be reviewing how the roads are rated. There have been different people doing the ratings. Those ratings were done by two different individuals. Staff will be reviewing how this was determined and why things do not make sense and to make sure ratings are consistent in the future. Council would like to receive the road ratings with a mill and overlay request. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated these ratings need to be explained to him. If a road is rated at 71.8 and now comes back at 27.05, what does the rating mean? Do we look at it, do drilling, 100k at how much asphalt there is? It is fine to fix this in the future, but we need to fix this now. He cannot look into the future. He needs to know why they got to where they are today with these ratings. It was also brought to his attention that they did some blow patching which seemed to be experimental. City Engineer Mann replied from the standpoint that the City started doing it at a particular point and had not done it before that. It was a product that was out there and staff decided to try it to see if it worked. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated he walked a 10t of the roads before the milling took place and he saw areas around the blow patch where it 100sened a lot of the asphalt around it. He feels we put down a product that made the roads deteriorate faster. He would have wanted a normal asphalt patch rather than experiment with something that deteriorated the roads faster. Regarding the reconstruct area, he noted two to three weeks ago, in Centennial Drive and along a couple other streets that the curb was at a different level than it was to start with. It was his understanding they were not changing the level of the road. The curbs on Centennial Circle were dropped 6" to 8". That is not a mill and overlay that was a reconstruct from the start which he was not informed of. He cannot be responsible for any cost of that road as it is beyond what he Council Workshop Minutes August 31, 2006 Page 6 voted for. There are other areas where the road was dropped and they will have to take out all the asphalt and get down to the grade. He and City Administrator Herlofsky were looking at the project and Councilmember Pritzlaff stated they have three projects. There is a full reconstruct in Hill Dee, and mill and overlay which this was supposed to have been, now what he sees is a halfre-construct project. It is not a half-reconstruct it is a road reconstruct and that is not something he voted for. We would not have been in this situation ifhe had known then what he knows today. He asked who determined the amount of curb and the curb condition that would be replaced. City Engineer Mann replied he would have to check the records as to who was out there at the time. When the curb was being reviewed, some staff that is no 10nger with the City was directing the work. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated there had to have been some parameters as to what was bad and what was not. He noted there was some curb that should have been replaced. It would have been better at this stage, as it 100ks like a checker board and chopped up, if all of the curb had been done. There would have been some yard work needed, but he would have been willing to do that. If what is left is 35 years old, how much 10nger will it last? Driveways are a huge area to him. There are three driveways with new concrete and he was told driveways are incidental and the City is not paying for driveways. He does not think they are incidental as every driveway has been touched. There is no consistency as to how far they went back, why they went that far back, some went to the natural break, some made a new cut. There are concrete driveways that have a 45 kickout on one side, on the new it is straight down to the curb. On the asphalt driveways, they are 16" to 18" cut back from the curb to put a form in to do the curb. They have dropped at least 8" of asphalt in there instead of filling it with class 5. This was also done on portions of the road. That will do nothing but settle and pack down in the future. These people will have areas off their driveways that will hold water. That is unacceptable and he will not have people's driveways sinking in the future which they will do using asphalt as fill. There has been chipping of the new curb. There are already markings on the new curb that they will replace because of the mill and overlay. He assumed this was at the contractor's cost. There has also been grinding of the valley gutters. He assumed they were not doing that type of concrete because that is not mill and overlay. To change all the valleys that have been changed, he is not willing to accept that. A comment was made as to whether funds could help with this. He cannot stand spending any more money from the taxpayers on this. We need to 100k at insurance and see what can be done differently on this project. Future settling in the driveways that have been patched has been mentioned. What type of warranty do the people have whether it is concrete or asphalt if settles in one or two freeze/thaw cycles. Councilmember McKnight stated he would use Park Drive as an example. How does the City not know there is only 1.5" of bituminous on the street especially going into the project? City Engineer Mann stated he would have to ask the individual who put the project together as to why that happened that way. Councilmember McKnight stated that is unacceptable to him. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked a number of the questions he had. When looking at Park Drive that had a 73 rating in 2005. Someone else did the ratings this year and some roads took a substantial drop. Park Drive dropped down to 50. If something is a 73 he does not need to touch it. He understood if they are doing projects in the area and there are streets a little higher than the 55 we might as well include them. Councilmember Pritzlaff's comments on the ratings are 100% correct. Theses are not getting into the don't drive on me range. He has a number of questions on the financial implications. He did not vote for this project because residents did not deserve back to back assessments. Ifhe would have been fully informed, there would have been a very different reason as to why he did not vote for it. He asked who pays for this error? City Administrator Herlofsky stated the normal assessment policy is 35% to the residents and 65% to Council Workshop Minutes August 31, 2006 Page 7 the City. Acting Mayor Fogarty stated if Council does not want costs to the residents to increase per resident as an assessment, and we do not want the assessments higher than originally estimated what other options do we have to finance the remainder of the project. City Administrator Herlofsky stated staff has briefly discussed some options, but wanted to wait for Council direction. If Council does not want to go over the original 35%, one option would be 30% more, staffwould have to 100k at options. There are issues regarding the curb affecting storm water that would not only apply to this area, but to other projects as well. Whatever is not covered or directly assessed to the property owners in this area, the rest is shared with the rest of the community. Staff needs to be fair to these residents and the whole community. Councilmember McKnight stated we entered into this project thinking we need to A and now we need to do B. Does the City have any other alternatives on responsibility? City Administrator Herlofsky stated there are many issues where we go into an item and find out things we did not know at the beginning. This is not the only time this will occur. Staff needs to 100k at options. This was not a consultant project, this was City staff. There are questions about the amount of curb and the depth of the blacktop which would have been better to have known ahead of time. Everyone is trying to find a way to solve the problem. We have a situation that is not something we planned to be in and now we are 100king how to best handle it, learn so we do not make the same mistake again, and receive comments from Council. Councilmember McKnight asked if we know how much it would cost to finish all ofthe curb. Staff stated that would be based on the unit prices we already have and an estimate could be done. City Administrator Herlofsky stated this is the first mill and overlay in one specific neighborhood. They have observed 3rd Street between Ash and Spruce had a mill and overlay five years ago. One thing he noticed there was also portions of curb removed in that project. Now it is hard to determine what was new and what had been there previously. Staff needs to determine the cost and once the curb has weathered, will it make that big a difference. He suggested people 100k at 3rd Street and see if that is significant enough to merit additional cost. A resident asked what the difference is between having done all the curb in the beginning and going back to do it all now. City Administrator Herlofsky stated he was surprised by the amount of curb replaced. The issue was from a cost basis by making as much use of the curb that was there as possible versus tearing it all out it was a decision as to which is the better way to do it. If you remove the curb entirely you have to re-engineer and check the driveways and it ends up being higher engineering costs. If you take a chance and say there is not as much curb being removed you can keep the cost down, but it costs more to put the individual curbs in. It is a wash between the way it was done now and the added engineering costs necessary if we took it all out and started over again. There would also be more issues with the driveways as some of the grades would be changed. A resident stated on Lower Heritage Way every driveway was taken out. City Administrator Herlofsky stated the grade was not changed as they were put back to match up with the curb that was put in that was consistent with what was there before. The residents stated this is not the case. City Engineer Mann stated the intent was to follow the grade that was out there. Staff will 100k at the situation. City Administrator Herlofsky stated in a couple areas the reason the curb looks like it was 10wered was because the tree next to the curb had raised the previous curb and disturbed the normal flow of water which was the intent of the project to get the water more effectively out of the area. Where there was curb that had settled or been raised, the basic design was to line up the new curb so it would drain properly. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated there are some spots where the tree roots raised the curb. The few that there are does not take into account all the curb that was replaced. Looking at Centennial Court, that has severely dropped on one side 8" ifnot more. From that standpoint Council Workshop Minutes August 31,2006 Page 8 alone, that tells him it was a reconstruct project. Anything that had to deal with a reconstruct should come from the storm water fund. If we were trying to do that, he would have voted no for the project. He wanted to do a mill and overlay if that was warranted. Now he has a hard time seeing that was warranted. At 707 Centennial Court the approach on the driveway is raised 3" to 4". This needs to be reviewed. The grade was not supposed to have changed in this area. Every driveway in the area has been touched. That is not what he wanted done. Whatever the contractor was going to do as far as the driveways, it has to be uniform. How far did he go back on one driveway, why did he not go back that far on the next driveway? He would rather see it at the originalline when the homeowner had the driveway done. One has a cut that is not straight across and it is not up to the cut line. That is unacceptable. Where the filling was done with the asphalt, that is also unacceptable. The driveways were incidental, now they are not so incidental and he has a problem with that. As far as curb settling and appearance, the appearance is an issue but not as big an issue as the areas left that are 35-40 years old, we have told everyone that will extend the life of the road 10-15 years. He believes that within 5 years the portions of the curb not replaced now will be replaced. That is unacceptable. He did not want to see anything to do with this project for 10 years. He has an issue with taking out 4 ft. and leaving 8 ft. throughout the whole project. It is an internal issue that needs to be worked out. Whether it was City employees that were or are here, he needs to 100k at engineering. There are some mistakes from what he sees from the engineering firm that need to be 100ked at and held accountable. Maybe that is where some of this money needs to come from. This is not what was supposed to be done so there will be internal discussions on the engineering aspect. Councilmember McKnight stated when 100king at the current costs of $446,000 and the recommended cost of $609,700 for the full depth mill and saving the good areas, what are the ramifications if we decide to take this from a different fund and not assess that. What are the ramifications for past projects and for the future for setting a precedence? Ifhe lived in this neighborhood he would also be here. He needs to know the ramifications. Do we have the money, where will it come from, etc.? Those are legal questions that he will need answered before he can make another decision on this issue. Councilmember Fogarty also wanted to know the financial ramifications. She did not think this should cost the residents more than what was proj ected at the beginning. She understood it is much worse than what was expected. There is a calibration problem in the pavement management program between employees. When the numbers are so different it does not make sense and she relied on those numbers. As much as she does not find the numbers reliable it turns out that the engineer 100king at the pavement did understand what he was 100king at. Unfortunately, it was worse than he thought. These roads are in worse shape than anticipated and it probably should have been a full reconstruct. She would like to know about the funds and what kind of precedent will be set. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated this should not cost the residents one more dollar. Somehow this will have to come out of a different area and these people should not be assessed any more. He has serious issues whether the ratings are accurate. He hoped we do not take a rating just by 100king at a road. Why are we not doing drilling with a 1" hole and determining how much is there. How the roads are rated needs to be reviewed. He agreed we need to talk to the City Attorney. We need to finish the project. There should be some mechanisms in negotiating the rest of the curb. They have to replace 50% of new curb because of the mill and overlay breaking the edges. They have to be out there, so he does not see why they cannot negotiate a deal to Council Workshop Minutes August 31, 2006 Page 9 make the curb uniform. We need to get the project done. Funding is a big issue and engineering is on the top of the list. Internal explanations have to be brought forth. This will be placed on the September 5, 2006 Council agenda. MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritlzaffto adjourn at 8:21 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, /7 d? . /:?~- 6/ ." '~<:L ?y?~',:U 7'/l. ~7 Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant 7b City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator @- Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: SUBJECT: School and Conference DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION The Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRPA) offers an annual state conference for park and recreation professionals. DISCUSSION The 2006 MRPA State Conference will be held in Plymouth, Minnesota in November. Sessions are held on topics such as recreation programming, therapeutic recreation, aquatics, park maintenance, park planning, facility maintenance and administration. A request is being made to send four staff members to attend this state conference at the full conference registration fee. The four staff members are: Patti Norman, Recreation Supervisor; Kellee Omlid, Recreation Specialist; v1issie Kohlbeck, Senior Coordinator and Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director. Additionally, Dawn Johnson from the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) and Jeremy Pire, Facility Maintenance Supervisor would like to attend one day of the conference. BUDGET IMPACT The early registration fee for the full conference, if registering on or before September 22nd, is $315.00 for each person. After September 22nd the registration fee jumps to $345.00. The full registration fee covers all educational sessions and meals during the conference. The early registration fee for one day of the conference, if registering on or before September 22nd, is $170 for each person. The registration fee covers all education sessions and meals for the day. Total cost of the registration fees would be $1,600.00 Since the conference is within a reasonable driving distance, staff would be commuting with a City vehicle each day to the conference. Funds are available in the 2006 budget to cover the cost of the full MRP A conference registration fee for four staff members and a one day conference registration fee for one staff member and a PRAC member. ACTION REQUESTED By motion, approve this request. (t9ctfyJlY >>~ R(nl~tad, Parks and Recreation Director cc: Patti Norman Missie Kohlbeck Kellee Omlid Jeremy Pire Dawn Johnson 7e- City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator FROM: Tim Pietsch, Fire Chief SUBJECT: School and Conference DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION Minnesota State Fire Chief's Annual Conference, Duluth MN DISCUSSION Four members of the Farmington Fire Department have signed up to attend classes at this annual conference. Tim Pietsch, Terry Thraen, Troy Corrigan, and Todd Kindseth have signed up for various workshops. The classes start on Thursday and run thru Saturday. BUDGET IMPACT The 2006 budget provides adequate funding for this request. The funding would come out of the training portion of the budget, category 1060-6470. The registration fee is $150.00 per attendee for a total of $600.00. All four attendees will be driving separately. ACTION REQUESTED Approve Fire Chief's request to send these members to the annual conference. Additional information will be provided. RespectfullRubmitted, ~~~ 'r~ Tim Pietsch Fire Chief cc: file ~ "C Q) o .~ ~~ &. rflrflcfttf!."#.rfl.rfl.?f!.';flcf!. ;~;bSi:gf\iro~:etn ~~rri~~ui~~gg Q) o c .!!l '" en It)('l')(OO.....,......OC>>vlO COOl.....""" MOO('l") t--..... 0(00),....(''')0)0.......<0..... <Ii~M-ONM.n~tri,..: CO .....(I")CJ).....,.... .....(t) ...... "lI''''-C\j .....c:o N M ... ... c.or---OOO)MO.....CON .....0 'V M<.0 0> 0<0 N..::t .....cnN(I")(OOO,....NC") 3 C'i";<"iNr-:ari6aiN<D 3 ...-NCOlOlONLO MN (3. '" '" ~N~ NO> 0 N M I- ... ... 0 0 .... .; 0 0 '" Q) Q) "!. Cl Cl ... > > 0 0 Z Z ;3 U 0 '9 '9 Q) Q) rJl rJl M ~~ffireg~~~~ N N o lOCOCC 10,....0>0>0 g en ~,..:,..:,..:,..:a:iNa:iN g CO M ~ ~ NN -< .... -< M ~;1)~~mg~~~;! 0 3 ... COO('l')('I"),.........,....U')O)CO 3 ..: ct5~rt5,..:o..;a:i~a:io a; 0 .... .......~ N<<> ..., '" .... ..., 0" COCOOOCONONNCO <<> coomNocolOLOcnco <<> N_CO .......cn..N........ f"oo.. ~ 0). r---. Q) 0 .... COCOlO"'I:tCO.....COcn Q) c M 0> .... M~ N<<> c " !:!!. Ol. " ..., N ..., ?:- '" N E N.....l.t)COCOOO.......... E '" mCO('l')Nlt)ll)COO>Ol 0 CX).....lt)('t)..........LOO>M " ~ cD cD,..:~Ncci~co,..: ~ rJl ~ co ,.-..... NlO a; ::;: ::;: Ol "C " ... en '" O>.....,.........CO.....ONNlt) c;; COOlQ"O.....C\l,...Ll)LOC>>"lI' ~q~~C"1..q:,,.....'lllto>_r---_ 9 0 .....a.nO)CO....."lI'CO co'" 9 <<> M co~ N~ -< N -< "C Q) "C rfl.~ x w rflrfl.rflrfltf!.rfl.rfl.rfl.rfl.rfl.rfl.rfl.rfl.rfl.rfl.?ftrflrfl.?f!.?ftrflrfl.?f!.rfl.rfl.rfl.* o LO'V......CO 10 LOCO('l'),...."lI'o>co,....m.....NO..... CO"ll'.....cn,....cn"ll'..... "lI'NLOCQO,....,....CO"ll'M,...ONlONOCO"'l!"('l')O.....C\l.....('I")..........lO ~g~~~gg~~~~~g~~~~~~~~m~~~~~ Q) o c '" OJ en O('l')('l')LOW.....CO<oO.....CO<oON<C'VCO('l')(O<CCONO"'l!"COON LO,...NlO<C"lI',...NCO"ll'''lI'''lI'NCQCQCOCQN.....o.....m,...vvM('I'] lO"lI'CJ).....,............. ll).....ONON..........O,....'VNOC>> lO...............lOCO moa:i,..:MmN~ma:iMa:icD~N~tri Ntri~MNocDNO ~O~N~M~~~~MNN M~~ ~~~NM~~M~ N ~ ~ N~~ N ~ ~ ~~m N ... O~~IDN~MMM~M~~~N~~~O~NO~~~O~ o~m~w~~~m~~NN~w~N~w~~~~mNON ~~NO~~~o~~owmO~NO MNwO~Nmo~ ~~ ~~~~~mNO~~~~~~ ~mOM~O~~N ~m ~~~O~ID~~N~ ~MO N~~~~~~~~ N ~ M~N~~ON N N ~ ~ N ~ o .; ... ... ... M ~~m<O~O~NM '" , ~OMN~~OcnM <<> cnM~M~~Nmco ~ cD ~~W~N~~ r:O~ 10 ~ N~ NCO ::;: ~ ... ... 0> ~,.....,.....wmOONm <<> . M~CO'"Ct('t')l.()COmN 0 WI,()O~N,.....Nmm ~ ..: ~"":":<<i~~ co.o. Q) <<> .... <<> ~ N~ U. co N ... c '" ..., o o .... .; '" No NCOOO~~ -v~U')~~~ W~~MN~ N.N~ ~,.: ~ NN ~ o~ ;;;;}; "":< ... -f-- ... ... I ;~c 15 .B ~ u... <<>~ 8-g Nen .. u C .. ii en 'C c ;::) u.. ~OCOOOOOOO,.... OOl,()OOOOOOU') NW~~ooo~m~ r:Oai":~O~~~"":M mN,....COl.()~N~~CO N m M~N C"')~ ~ ,..: ... ... c -B .g o '" Q) Cl 3 ~ (3. c Q) > Q) 0:: _ s.~ ~ en c: ~ Q) ~ ~~:5~ CI) co E \- 'E ~ !Iii-en Q).EQ)C:~ ~~51.~ ~Q)sJl1.s! ~~gEgJe>~gJfl~ ~ct~~iE~6.s~~ c g Ol C .g '" u. '0 .~ u 'E " o o :t. "C c " u. . ~l()COCOI,()~~N~m~N~,....CO~~ f"'-COU')IDM~~=coC"')~m~~~~N ~~NNOCOM~U')COMf"'-N Nf"'-~ MN ="':W~MM~m~r:O r:O~~ "'=t ~ C")~C"')""'f"'-~N ..- ..... ~f"'-mcoC")U')o ~U')"-LONmoc:t o::>.....o~co~m N OMN"':"cD -v ..... -v C") comLOC'O.....~O"'=tNMOCO('l') ~NM~mo~U').....~coo..... NN N,....~,.....M,....(Cm~N ~.N. ~~M.,...:a)c5m,.:~M ~ N..-oc:t.....Lt)...-l.t)~"l;t' ... .....f"'-co,....mf"'-NNU'),....U')O<q NCX)M,....CX)LOa:>~OMO::> lO 1.01.00 U')..... L{)OO::>O::> 0 -.:i cD N -.:i":cr:i~ a) ~ C") I,() U') "" co .... ... ... oC")...-m(ONa:>O(OOOON(OM~(C ~~ ~~~~~~~m~gC")~8~ ~~ cr:i~"':"~<<iN~"':"":a) N~ai -v ..- M,,-('l')~I.O:!:N CC~N ... f"'--V..-(OL{)~U')"'=tM(Of"'-(Oa:>O~NN NO::> ~"'=t""IDI,()~mCOCOO..-I,()NO OID ..-mOM~~mMOm I,().....~ N~ cr:i~"":M~NM~~ai ~MM ('t') ...- M,,-('l')~('l')::N N N ... Q)1,()_ocoU')mCOf"'--V(O~COCOOOco ...-1,() ~l,()oo::>com~NNm"-C")ID~ (O~ m'VO-vNmNO,.....~mmMN ~O ~,..:~ai~~~ocDo 0 M M ...-...-('l')~('I')..-(O~C"') ('I') M ... ~ ::;: ..-('I')..-..-CO~..-I,()Nf"'-..-O('l')COOCOf"'- O-v O_Mm..-('I')NI,()COO..-Nf"'-c) (O~ ~M"-ID"'=tO(oCONO Nl()~ ~= <<i":~"":NNNNO"": ~~<..-CO""lt('l')(oNW~~O::>ll) CO..- ...-..-..-NI,()..-COf"'-~~ ..-~ NL{)COU')COCOO'VNf"'- "':gf ~~LCi;i~~~;io.re -Vmco Nf"'--vWCONl() O)ll)f"'- COll)Q)('I')-vNO ('l')COO) I OCO~ll)f"'-~~ ~N~M a)LCiLO~llicr:i<momf"'-ll)O ~m ~~~~~~~~~~~g~~ ~r:O N"~"":N"Nr:OM~r:O~ ~lli~ ..-N ~ M..-N"-~"-~ N N ~ ... ~ .C: ... ... r ... I. ... ... ... I, ~....~ ~.; ~. N~ ~. I. <<>~ 8-g NlI] omo~cocommMm_-vll)OCOCOll)O~('l')ONCOm~Of"'- ~~~N~~~~~~~~:!:~~~~~~~g~~~~~~ ~~a)~lli,...:,..:~r:OciM<<i~LCicr:i~r:O O~~cDMOID"":~ com..-,.......-..-U')~('t')CO~ll)f"'- CO"'=tf"'- ..-m~"""~l()('l')o(O '"Ct N..-'V..--v.....~~M 'V N ll) ..- 'V-"'=tNf"'- o ~ ... ... <<> CO N CO '" I M. Bl: "" "00 "" ... r ON~_(OCO_O~ -rrI' ..-~m"'=tf"'-COOOO 0 ~~ci-~~~;:.~~~ *. ~ _N~_-Vf"'-~ ~; I ""' CO"l:tNmOLOLO en ~ mCOM-voc:tM-v en m.....coo(Oom'~ ~ ~N~~~ 0 g '" !:!!. L()f"'-_~NCOCO N MOCOMN~I,() _ COM~MM-vOI,..... ~<<J.~~<<i<<iM N. ~N"- M.....M "'=t <<> "'=tCONwco,.....m 1U'i~re~~~a!) "".N" O. ~.CO. m. N. N__ N N o f"'-<<J-vCO I,()('t') LOO_f"'-I,()N-v l,.....m~N~Or-.. r:O~~ID"":N~ NN N~N 'E 'E >- Q) Q) E &c: ~~ ~en ",0 c~~ ~Ol fl", CE ~~~ -B~~ ~~ _~~g~~ I c: Q~Q) gQ)~~~~ coc:~~5e_ ! .Q ~~i- ~C~~C:~ ~SOC:~~~ ~Q)i ~Q)C ~~E~-B~ ~ E~gJ."'CO ~.~_~C:~g ~-C:UQ)COC: ~ Q)~~~~~~ li~~~~rn~.~~~~~3~ ~~ .sOC_~ig~~ .. .~ .E- ~ E E E ~ 2 ~ E .~ 0 gJ Q) 0 .5 rJl Q) ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ oC:co'- _~>E~enO~iO~-~.-um ~~~W8~E~~~8~~Ew~&.~0rJl~OO~~~&.~ ~~~~::~~~M~~~~~gID~~~~~~g~~o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '9 Q) Cl '" o o N ~ "C C " U. ~ l...J ....... "N '" 0, ~. i9 I .... '" en M '" :~ "", :g r I IC"'J' '" COjl :. ..I I~ 1<<> I I .", ~8~ .~: ... '''' ..,. M en '" ... ... '" .... 'M .r; ;;; ... 3 o I- 8.~ ,,0 ~~ H 0"- ~ 8 g~ :i::c5l "0 Q) > ~.~ Q) 0:: Q) o C .!!l Ol en 3 (3. o Q) Cl > o Z ;3 Q) C " ..., ?:- '" E E " rn 0; Ol "0 " en ro ::;: .0 Q) u. C '" ..., <<>0; 8-g Nm C ~ .C o Ul Q) Cl C .9 Ol C .~ '" u. '0 .~ u c: " o o o -< "0 C " U. .. "0 c: " u. .. " c: ~ .. It: *- '" .... d '" '" 0" '" ~ cD e ... ... o ~ cD o ... ... N o '" ... ~ .... .... ... ... Ol '" '" .... co ... N '" N N ... '" '" 0> ..n Ol ... o ;;; ... ~ ;;; ..n ... o o o o N ... *- ... o ,..: Ol N ~ a; a5 C ... a; ~ ~ ~ '" N M ... N '" <<> M ... o co Ol N N <<> ... '" .... '" cD ... a; '" ..: Ol ... Ol ;;; .... ... <<> ... o o o o ... ... Ul l!! " "" "0 C ~ x W I,;f ~I ~ t~ ~ ~.I I '''.1 (,I t~ h E"I ~, ~ ~: ~, ~~ ~ 'I ,-t I~ ""-\ '8 'N .<OJ n 0; ~ :~:l ,!' .,...... ~, " ~ ..,.,.j , oJ i ~ Jl. ..... ... ,J, NI 8 'm' ~~~ ~ ~ ~ .!:. I.' ~ 9 'Ii' i .~~ I..: .'1 .,,1 t-' " 01 ..,;p , :) .. ! .;! ~ o u. .. ~ '0 II.. *- <<> '" N Ol '" Ol '" ... ... '" o ... ,..: ... ... ... ... N o .; ... '" ;;; o o o. ... co <<> ~ ... ... o o ... ... ... o o o a5 ... Ul Q) " C Q) > Q) 0:: *- ... o ai '" .... .... co .; '" N ~ M '" co N. ... N o N ... Ol .... co ... '" co '" ... <<> ~ ... o Ol ... ... o o o a5 ... Ul l!! " "" "0 C ~ x W 1 ~ M r I 1.,.1 j: J .~ I~ ;:,' o :~I t'~ '0 .... '~j d * I",' ~ ... J~! 1 I 1 , 1 .,.. ~l ti 1 1 II ~ .!! C!) 1 !1~ :~I ..I L' 1 , J 1 1'1 I *- o ;;; <<> '" ~ ... ... ~ fi o l6 co 0 ~ N ... ... a'i ..... ~ <<> ... o o ... ..n ... ... <<> '" Ol ..: ~ .... '" '" ~ ... '" ... o en ... Ol ... N N ~ ... Ol ;g M ... ... N ... cD ... o o o cD Ol N ... Ul Q) c " .. C E ~ .. Q) ell: .5 'l!: .. II.. *- '" ... ai ... Ol <<> co en o N '" <<> ... N '" ... '" o ... o N ... '" <<> '" ..n '" ~ N .; ... <<> ... N "i ... '" N '" cD '" ... ... ;;; cD '" ... '" ~ ..n ... o o o ~ ... ... Ul l!! " .'" "0 ~ X W Ii I I II I ! I -, I i$1 ;9 !il it J llill <<>1 :~i ... I~ fljl ..J I :- I~I <01 .,. I~J !ill l~ CO 1;;;1 '81 J ....' ; :... fo2' N '~t ....1 ; I ....1 I -, I I I ~ Ii - ~ l! .. o c: .2 7Q Q) U .. It: ~ o '" N <'i '" ?fl.~~ "'....... ........Ol d~~ <<>co.... .... ;;; en '" ~ NON "'<0'" NN'" C'i..,..:t:ti <<>NCO fh fhCflut ("') <ONce ~ ce....CD ,.... NN"'=I' < ... N o ~ 0<<><<> CO"'~ 0"'''' ......("')~~ ~N'" ... ... ... ... '" co <<> .; N COOl.... "'co... ...."'''' cD en en" ~"'.... ... ... ... ... <<> ~ ~ ..: '" lil~ii; CO~Ol 000 ~N'" Ol ~ ..n '" <<>...0 ......Ol Ol"'''' ~cDa:i ... ... ... ... '" Ol "'. "'co'" <<>... ~ ",...CO ~l6~ ... ... ... ... ... co co N "'....0 ........'" N~'" 'i""':~ ... ... ... ... '" <<> .... N ~<<>.... <<>CO... NN'" en""':"': ... ... ... ... '" Ol .... ... OCOCO "'Ol'" ........'" ..,..: C'i ... ... ... ... o '" o a5 Ol N CONO "'Ol'" "''''0 (t)"en<<i '" '" Ol ~~N ... ... ... ~8 .so.. ~ ~ <2 'E .~ .5 Q) ~ rnrn 0'" ~~ ... ... NN Ul Ul ~ Q)"" ""0 C C ~ ~ Q) x o::w ... ... ... ... I I I.J I~ iil ~ J :"1 ...... l(ll o I~I f: ,IIi .... "'I I~ .... oN j'" CO .... lit ..... , I ,'" ....1 I~ ~ I I ... Ii; ~ I :... 1m ~ ..nl I~ .. I fIo:l I . !Bi .... II I I I I !.,.: I I~I ....:. I I I I I ,'" ~ ~ ~I ! <( .. .!l *- '" "": ;;; o '" '" ..: Ol ... ... o .... ..n '" ~ ... ... o o o on ... .... co ..n ... .... .... N .; N ~ ~ ... ... '" ;! N N ... co o <<> o '" ... N o o ..: ... ... N a'i cD ... o o '" N '" N ... Ul Q) " C Q) > Q) 0:: '" c: ~ o ... ~* Ol .... N "'- ;;; ... ;;; ..: Ol N 1 I I 1 1 I. I I' N Ol <<> o '" i"" .Ol, ~) :lil' ,0 , .i .,. Ii. .",. ,<;I (:!l ~~ ;"'j 'i I~J I~' l d N. <<>' ;:;t [~' I"";, 1 ' .,.; ~~ -81 . , 19 II;( c~. 14 U I ~j 0' "] N ... co '" N ..n N ... ~ N <<> en co ~ .... co ..n ... .... Ol ... .; '" ... <<> ... en '" ... ... Ol "'. ~ ~ ... '" co '" o '" ~ ~COI ~~ .~. li oJ . , j ..... ~~ I, ... ~ ... '" en N '" ... ;.., . 1 I' I , II.' I.!II Idl ,. e .... Ul l!! " "" "0 C Q) 0- x W 8.~ ,,0 ~~ H 0"- ~ 8 U f" ""- ~ "C Q) ~.~ o Q) 0: ?:- '" E E " rn 0; Ol "C " en <<>0; 8-g Nen C $a Ol C .g '" u. '0 ~ u Q) o C '" OJ en 3 (3. o Q) Cl > o Z ;3 " ..., Q) C " ..., <l: OJ ::;: ~ Q) u. C '" ..., C :S 'C o Ul Q) Cl 'E " o o o -< "C c " U. ~ ~ g ~ ~ cO <0 .... Ol .... ... <<> '" <<> Na 0 '" Ol "!. co ... ... :n ": r:: '" N ... ... N ~ M <<> '" ... ~ .... ~ Iii co '" ... o Ol '" o 0> '" :n <q. :n '" ... '" N ~ en ;;; ... <<> '" ~ a; N ... co ~ en ... N ... o Ol "'. ;;; N ... o o co M o co M ... Ul III ~ c c ~~ 1\I Q) :;;0: ;;; ..... ~ N Ol N :n o N '" ... ... ;;; .... o co N ... Ol co '" cD .... ... N <<> <<> ..: .... ... ... <<> a; N co '" ... <<> N co cD ... '" ... N o ... M '" N ... ... '" co. :n N ... co Ol '" N a; M ... Ul ~ " "" "C C Q) 0. x W [.'.... ,., ,~ 'I I~f " ;1 ~, ~. :.j r~. p:. ~; ~C!)I ~'; ~ lib. :m ii' ~ "1 ~, ~ j1~ ~ !J. tt.' r~.. I... :~. t~l .~ i ~~ ,lI!i ~ .~'!. ~ ii. ,,?' ~I f.. ~I co j~ ~ ;ik ,"- (5i, ~< t;1 :~J ~ ~~I r5 il ~ "':1 J?l 1,1 'I. f' I ... ~ o co .... cO ... ... ;:l; cD o .... ... ... <<> '" <<> M o co ... ... '" '" ... M ~ ... Ol Ol <<> Iii <<> ... '" N M o N ~ '" co M o ... Ol co co cD <<> ... N o "'. :n ... <<> .... o Iii o ... Ol .... N .; ... o o o o :no ~ ... Ul Q) " c Q) > Q) 0: II 1ft ~ :n co N <<> ai N .... ~ ~ ..: .... .... <<> o .... ..: co ... .... '" .... ai Ol ... N a; Iii Ol o '" co cD Ol ... .... co '" Iii o ... '" .... N en ~ ... o '" N en co ... co ~ .; Ol ... '" ... .... Iii o "'. ... Ul ~ " "" "C C Q) 0. X W .. I 1 I I (" "1 I.~ ,:, 1'1 . , (I P 1,1 fa' ~I I~ .... ''';: I~ '.' r. iiC I~ l'? fIi ,,' "" ,lZJ "~ ~ I !..J .,. .N 'N' 1M ~~ It? ,... d ~~ co.' ~ M; '. ., .. ~ M: '..,/ ~ ~ ....' N, .... 1--: <')J '. -. , , !'. :~ ;"'j ~~ ~ ,'$ No :"'l 1:' ....1 :'Ic' 'S 1111 I~ .... ~ o o co .; ... :n .... ai '" co ... ... Ol ... '" ... ~ ~ ~a ~ ... ... '" o Ol. ~ ~ ... .... <<> ~ cD Ol ... N co .... ai .... ~ <<> '" .... ..: '" ... ... '" <<> M Ol ... <<> N <<> co' .... ~ ... '" co ..: '" ~ ... <<> ~ .; Ol ... o o o ,.: at ... Ul Q) " C Q) > Q) .,0: ... 1\I ~ :2 '0 Ul 1ft N <<> 05 ... <<> N ai r:: ;;; .... cD ~ ... <<> .... co o '" ... .... .... <<> N '" N ::;: N Iii <<> N ... o .... '" Iii ... N ... ... Ol ... ai N ~ ... .... o '" en co ... co ... o M ~ ~ ... co o o o '" o N ... Ul ~ " .." "C C Q) 0. x W I I I I I ~I ~I i j ..., ~1 I;:l;J '~II .... ,..I ~I' c.,. ... ~I :~I ..., :~I I~I .... ~l :~'I' ..... 1"', I~I ~1 ,..., i~1 ~I I I !... I I I l'lc I~ 1'1: o 1ft .... C! :: '" N N M '" ... ... '" .... .... cD <<> N ... ... ~ ... en '" ... '" N o cD ... co .... o M <<> <<> ... '" M N ... N C;; .; ... '" Ol ... N '" ... <<> o co N N ... N .... .... "i ... o o o o o '" ... Ul Q) " C Q) > :;& OJ ~ E o U; 1ft ... <1 ~ .... '" '" o cD Ol ;;; o en '" N Ol o O. N ... o '" Iii ... ... N '" <<> cD N N Ol '" M N ... ... '" ~ cD N ... ~ .; N ... o <<> "'. ~ ... ... '" '" N en N ... <<> <<> o Iii '" '" ... Ul ~ " "" "C ~ X W II I II I. I! ~~ .~ ~N' ij 1m; ~, co' .~j ~~ 1..,1 .$) ,$!, N r, 1"'" ~~IJ ~ ~~l I~' r ..,.. I" ",,' ~r. . . '" .~ l~. I~ .... . . lO. ,'" I~. .~ . . I~. ... '~l r;e I. L~ ~;:~ .,.~ l:g: ""'~ !~ P 1't 'co. ~: t~ 0). ~;'j II .... I I ~~. j= e:. 1ft '" .... .0 '" Ol .... co Iii .... <<> ... ... ~ en <<> q ... ... <<> co ... o N ... <<> a; Iii !:: ... Ol o '" M ~ ::;: .... N ~ ... co <<> Ol N '" ... ... .... Ol cD N ... N co o ai o ... '" ... .... ai co ... o o o Iii ... ..... ... Ul Q) " c Q) > Q) 0: jl ~ o o ciae '" c;; ... ,.: .... '" N '" '" Iii '" co co o ~ :n ... <<> ~ N ~ ... .... co N ..: .... Ol .... '" Iii '" ... '" '" <<> en N ... N <<> '" .; .... ... Ol .... .... ;;; ... <<> '" .... M .,. ... '" N co N' '" .... ... Ul ~ " "" "C ~ X W ~ ~ . ,I I I I I+- .al @ 1,1 I'" :m, ';1 'ai, r! "'1 I.., 10Il1 19. 1....1 1';1 ...., INI I~ ... 1",1 1:&, I~I ...., 1';1 ... 1<<> ~~J ...' all I~l ..., I~I co I;:, 1;1 lOR I l~ I~ I~J .,., I '...1 I~I I~ I.... ...1 . '" ~ig ,c ~ "'Q. 8." ,,0 "'" .;,.l! H OIL ~8 ~J l ~ '5: Q) u ~ c C ctl 0 ctl 0 LL co - C) ~ -0 C II) c .- ca :J E to) u.. ... "C L{') ca 0 LL t: 0 ~ N ?:- ~ LL . '" 0 E ca E co " ~ ... 0 rn ~ Q) " 0; t: 0 Ol 0 Q) N "C . " C) en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c5 c5 c5 c5 c5 c5 c5 c5 c5 c5 c5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ""0 No C!- eo CD "" N N "" CD eo E;; .... .... U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 a:>uBIBS pun:l c .9 Ol c .~ III U. '0 .~ t) ,,- ~~ ~li H ou.. ~~ ~!s i::S . ( 7e... City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administratora FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Customer Service Response Report DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION The customer service satisfaction program is designed to evaluate and measure the level of customer satisfaction during service-related interactions. Citizen service requests are documented in terms of complaint type, referring department, priority and service outcomes. Residents are surveyed and responses are typically anonymous to ensure that citizens with negative experiences are just as likely to respond as those with positive service experiences. It is the City's intent to use this information as a customer service tool to improve and promote excellence in customer service. DISCUSSION The table below reflects summary statistics generated by Citizen Action Request forms for the second quarter of 2006. Summary response percentages are generated through the analysis of monthly reports and include response data from all operating City departments. # of # of Surveys Prompt Personally Courteous Month Service Returned Service Satisfied & Helpful Requests (actual responses) (actual responses) (actual responses) April 107 20 80% 85% 90% May 60 9 100% 100% 100% June 54 14 85% 92% 92% 2DdQuarter Summary 221 43 88% 92% 94% The percentages reflect the number of actual surveys that indicated a response in any given category. Calculations are based on the actual numbers of responses received, which may differ from the number of surveys received. Some respondents did not indicate answers to all survey questions. Interms of how personally satisfied a resident is with a specific service outcome, staff responses are, in most cases, controlled by state statutes, City ordinances, available staff resources and/or service priorities. In some cases, responses are a function of a third party who must respond to a given situation. BUDGET IMPACT None. ACTION REQUESTED For information only. Respectfully submitted, . (-:7' /7/1 /' ft..J-t'L (I - yj?t t:iCt1/6 rC'- Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director 7F City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Councilmembers City Administrator (j FROM: Brian A. Lindquist, Acting Police Chief SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Dakota County Traffic Safety Group DATE: September 18,2006 INTRODUCTION The Farmington Police Department is seeking authorization to continue its participation in the Dakota County Traffic Safety Group. The attached resolution authorizes that participation. DISCUSSION In 2005 the Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) recognized the Dakota County Traffic Safety Group as a valuable, cooperative enforcement effort. OTS awarded a significant grant that allowed funding for one major traffic operation per month in locations all over the County. Over the past year thousands of traffic tickets have been issued by the group. Hundreds of arrests for DWI, Warrants, and other serious driving violations have resulted from this cooperative effort. The Office of Traffic Safety has again made funding available and is entering into a grant agreement with the Dakota County Traffic Safety Group. Participation requires that the City Council of each City adopt the attached Resolution. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the Attached Resolution authorizing participation in the Dakota County Traffic Safety Group. Res~e fUlly/y SUbm~itte~d' _ ,/,/ ." ... . G./ /-' /~ .' ~~_., ~ y Brian A. Lindquist Acting Police Chief CITY OF FARMINGTON A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF FARMINGTON TO ENTER INTO A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE DAKOTA COUNTY TRAFFIC SAFETY GROUP WHEREAS, the City of Farmington desires to participate in the Dakota County Traffic Safety Group Grant Project. WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota requires a resolution of the City Council to participate. WHEREAS, the City has entered into previous grants to provide increased traffic enforcement and educational activities. WHEREAS, the City has partnered with other Dakota County law enforcement agencies to increase traffic safety in the community. WHEREAS, the City will partner the 11 other government entities in Dakota County to increase traffic safety. WHEREAS, the City Councilors of the City of Farmington have duly considered this matter and believe that it is in the best interests of the City to enter into a grant agreement with the OTS through the DCTSG to provide enhanced traffic enforcement. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement and any amendments, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. ADOPTED this 18th day of September, 2006 , Mayor ATTEST: , City Clerk City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us ~ TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator FROM: Jennifer Collova, Natural Resource Specialis~ Wetland Alteration Permits - 195th Street Extension SUBJECT: DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION The 195th Street Extension was approved by the City Council on August 21, 2006. A wetland alteration permit is required when projects impact water/wetland resources regulated by local, state and federal agencies implementing the MN Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) of 1991. DISCUSSION This project will provide an essential east-west corridor on the north side of the City. There will be wetland impacts associated with the bridge crossing of North Creek and CP Railroad. Excavation will impact a total of2.96 acres of Type 2 wetland. Proposed replacement will be at 2:1 on-site with the creation of a 4.62 acres new Type 2 wetland area and 2.51 acres of upland buffer for a total of 7.13 acres of wetland replacement. The mitigation site is located adjacent to North Creek and just north of the wetland impact site. A Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) was held on August 8, 2006. The TEP panel discussed the permit application and forwards a recommendation for approval of the application. Ben Meyer of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, the City's consultant, has also reviewed the wetland alteration permit application and recommends approval of the permit (see attached). ACTION REQUESTED Approve the Wetland Alteration Permit for 195th Street Extension with the following conditions: I) Mitigation site will be protected within a City-controlled outlot at the time the property is platted. 2) SWCD will be copied on yearly wetland mitigation monitoring reports. cc: file --f /~ C/ Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Wetland Conservation Act Application for Impacts ~ 10,000 Square Feet Name and Address of Local Government Unit: City of Farmington Attn: Ms. Jen Collova 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024-1374 WCA Agent Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc. Attn: Mr. Ben Meyer 2335 West Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 t ----.,j Name of Applicant: Lee Mann, City of Farmington Application Number: 141-06271 (1 95th Extension to TH 3, Phase 1) Type of Application (check one): o Exemption Decision o No Loss Decision o Wetland Boundary and Type Determination (8J Replacement Plan Decision o Banking Plan Decision Date of Application: July 13,2006 Location of Project: N 1/2 ~ 111- 19 Sec. Twp. Range Summary of Project: Proposed extension of 195th Street to TH 3. This will provide an essential east-west corridor on the north side of the City. This roadway will be constructed to meet the eventual demands of a 4-1ane arterial. The maior obstacle with this proiect is the North Creek and CP Railroad crossing. This called for the construction of a bridge and approaches large enough to handle the future 4-lane road and pedestrian trails, thus resulting in the proposed wetland impacts of2.68 acres of Type 2 wetland along North Creek. Another wetland will be crossed at the connection of the new road with TH 3 resulting in 0.28 acres of Type 2 wetland impacts. The 2.96 acres of total wetland impact will be replaced at 2:1 through the creation of 4.62 acres of new Type 2 wetland and 2.51 acres of upland buffer for a total of 7.13 acres of wetland replacement. The mitigation site is located adiacent to North Creek and iust north of the wetland impact site. You are hereby notified that the above-referenced application was made to the Local Government Unit on the date stated above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments will be accepted on this application until August 11, 2006. A decision on this matter will be made August 21, 2006 City Council Meeting. Contact Ben Meyer at 651-604-4767 for details or changes to decision-making schedule. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT - CitY of Farmington ~~-:-. -~ . . ,~-'-~" ~.------:.7_______ /---- ------ :~~-,-------...._./ //~~....----~ ~ /) / ~/ Signature L-// /:"-j / l!_ / 'f)."J ./ /' /1-1..- i.0 Date WCA Agent Title Page 1 of2 lJ.l()h'771 u/r;\ ~T"j-~,...c> T.................--,r>..,~ rr.................---.._ 1i\i\i\1\__c.. ..J__ I ]~~~~-~- ( '\--- ) / / \ \ \ ..... ..... "\ --- _--I - I I I I / ~/ J I II II II .. "~r / iJ;" d . 'I / / I I I ..-J . l [ll fll Hi I., 11' ,- =-:J I I Q . , 1'1 fjl I'i ':1 j I ~ "CJ , ['f .II r' ,jj lp -\ -f \ v=P-<", - ~......." - --\ \ ., \ II II :11 II .11 -II -_II .11 -I I -I \ rill ~I\ I oqtO/ frj'Sj" '" " ! '", ::}z','i::! ,,\ .', " I.) -~ D~ '8'" CJ . ..'-- ..--.--. Q/ 6)' b '<"~D \ \~.D o....Jf<_ CJ o "I :=- - -J o I 'm,-=J ~' >~,:I\O ~. ... - II / 0 : ::,0:; ': / 0':':" il CD' /' . . :- : -: l' I' - ..----.......'....~.. - B'_.! -_..- <... .'~:: ~L.~L __ . ~".r- -'-- ,-- ~r---'-"-"-.~1J--._:T . I. -~--'-.;H3._- . - .. ------ C;f.... ------'0 . \\ ,r ~ ~/ "L --~~\ -- """"" , J \I-oct; l' . .0 II - I l- Oll .11 I . . ------..-...... i I I I i i I I I I fROPOSED ITY OF FARMINGTON 95th STREET EXTENSION TO TH 3 - PHASE 1 IJ -.- . 195th STREET ALIGNMENT EXHIBIT 2 ~ Bonestroo -=- Rosene ~ Anderlik & . \J' Associates o I Scale 400 I in feet $' Engineers & Architects City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7~ TO: Mayor, Councilrnernbers, City Administrator () FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Trunk Highway 3/19Sth Street Intersection Control Funding - Update DATE: September 18,2006 INTRODUCTION/DISCUSSION At the August 21,2006 City Council meeting, the Council authorized staff to prepare an application for cooperative agreement funds for the intersection of Trunk Highway 3 and 19Sth Street. At that meeting, it was the understanding that the deadline for application at the State was October 1, 2006. This information has been clarified and the actual deadline is October 11, 2006. The resolution needed for the application will be brought to Council for review and approval at the October 2, 2006 meeting. BUDGET IMPACT None at this time. ACTION REQUESTED For Council's information. Respectfully Submitted, ~Yh-~ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file Krista Flemming, Newland Communities 7/ ' City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator @ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer TO: SUBJECT: License for Utility to Cross Protected Waters DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION As part of the 195th Street Extension Project, a trunk water main pipe will need to be constructed crossing North Creek. The North Creek is classified as a protected waterway by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) and a license to cross must be obtained by the City before utilities crossing this waterway can be constructed. DISCUSSION Attached to this memo is a copy of the license for execution by the City of Farmington. The term of the license is for a 50 year period commencing on August 15, 2006. The license costs $237.00 for the lifetime of the license at which time the license must be renewed. BUDGET IMPACT The cost of the MNDNR license to cross the protected waterway is $237.00 and will be funded from the project budget. ACTION REQUESTED Approve by motion the attached License for Utility to Cross Protected Waters. Respectfull y Submitted, ~.ft1 ~ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Lands and Minerals 1200 Warner Rd St. Paul, MN 55106 PHONE: (651) 772-7942 FAX: (651) 772-7977 1 I ;~~~~ j/.<,~/, . lj~/ AUG I I ~, August 8, 2006 Lee Mann City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 RE: License #144-065-6465 Legal Description NE 1A NW 1A Sec 19. T114N. R19W Dakota County Company Project No#: N.A. Dear Licensee: Enclosed are three copies of the above license for execution by your company. The amended application is not included in this mailing but will be made a part of the license when completed. The license is for a 50-vear period commencing on AU2ust 15. 2006, at an additional advance rental of $237.00 which is payable upon return of this license. The DNR requires that you comply with certain construction procedures. Any deviation from the project is NOT authorized. As identified on your application, the crossing method is that of a NOT LOW Impact watermain trenchin2 under North Creek. Per Provision #15 A-G, Licensee must prepare, reseed, and mulch disturbed areas with native plant species. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed prior to construction and maintained by the applicant until vegetation is reestablished: Provision # 15F - All disturbed areas shall be stabilized as soon as possible following construction. Topsoil shall be used to re-dress disturbed soil areas, and indigenous plant species should be used, whenever possible, to revegetate disturbed areas. This revegetation should occur as early in the season as possible to permit adequate regrowth. Provision #15F requires that indigenous (native) plant species be used. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Seeding Manual outlines acceptable mixes according to type, purpose and maintenance requirements. The website is: www.dot.state.mn.us/environment.Click on "Erosion Control" then "Seed MixesfTUlf Establishment". Please have the license forms signed by the proper officials of the company. Return all the license forms to this office for execution by the State. Within two or three weeks, one license form complete with application and attachments will be sent to you for your files. License #144-065-6465 Page 2 When you return the completed forms, please enclose the additional payment of $237.00 made payable to the Department of Natural Resources. Payment is for the term of the license. If you have any questions, please contact me at (651) 772 7591. of Lands and Minerals Enclosed cc: Corps of Engineers Regional File MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LICENSE NUMBER #144-065-6465 APPLY NUMBER 78176 TRN 525 LS 09 COMPANY PROJECT NO: N.A. LICENSE FOR UTILITY TO CROSS PROTECTED WATERS This license is issued by the commissioner of natural resources under authority and subject to the limitations in Minnesota Statutes, section 84.415, and Minnesota Rules Chapter 6135 and other applicable law to the Licensee as named and for the fee and term as specified below. Name and Address of Licensee: City of Farmin2ton 325 Oak Street Farmin2ton. MN 55024 License Fee: Two Hundred Thirtv-Seven Dollars and no/l00 ($237.00) Term (years): 50 years Effective Date: AU2Ust 15. 2006 Termination Date: AU2ust 14. 2056 Purpose of License: Construction, maintenance and operation of a watermain crossing under water under the covenants and agreements of the Licensee to use the following described waters: That part of the NE 1A NW 1.4 in Section 19, Township 114 North, Range 19 West in Dakota County as shown on the attached application and map, all of which are made a part hereof by reference. This license is granted subject to the following provisions: 1. At the end of the license period if both parties wish to renew, the renewal fee and time period will be determined by such methods as are developed by the commissioner of natural resources. 2. This license shall be cancelable upon reasonable notice by the commissioner for violation of any of its terms, or if at any time its continuance will conflict with a public use of water over or upon which it is granted, or for any other reason. Licensee shall ensure that Licensee's employees, agents and contractors have received and thoroughly understand all conditions of this license. 3. Unless otherwise authorized by the commissioner, upon the surrender, termination or cancellation of this license, the Licensee shall remove from the above described waters all the utility lines and related structures owned by it. If Licensee does not remove such lines or related structures, all such lines or structures remaining shall become the property of the State, to be used or disposed of as the commissioner elects. The Licensee agrees to pay the State for the costs of removing and disposing of such lines or structures. 4. The Licensee shall comply with all federal, state and local laws and regulations, including municipal ordinances, affecting said waters, and shall remove all refuse and debris that may accumulate therein. The project hereunder shall at all times during and after construction be subject to inspection by the commissioner and for that purpose the Licensee shall grant access to the premises at all reasonable times. 5. The use of these waters by the Licensee in constructing or maintaining the lines for which this license is granted shall be subject to the use, sale, or leasing for mineral or other legal purposes. 6. This license is subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 84.415 and Minnesota Rules Chapter 6135. All standards of Chapter 6135 are incorporated as terms and conditions of this license, except such variations as are identified and approved by the commissioner in the license applications, plans and specifications which are attached and made part of the terms and conditions of this license. The Licensee is bound by the crossing location and installation method as detailed in the application and approved by the commissioner. The Licensee shall not deviate from the terms and conditions of this license or the application as approved by the commissioner unless it has first obtained written permission from the Regional Operations Supervisor. 7. This license is permissive only. No liability shall be imposed upon or incurred by the State of Minnesota or any of its officers, agents, or employees, officially or personally, on account of the granting hereof or on account of any damage to any person or property resulting from any act or omission of the Licensee or any of its agents, employees, or contractors relating to any matter hereunder. This license shall not be construed as estopping or limiting any legal claims or right of action of any person against the Licensee, its agents, employees, or contractors for any damage or injury resulting from any such act or omission, or as estopping or limiting any legal claim or right of action of the State against the Licensee, its agents, employees, or contractors, for violation of or failure to comply with the provisions of this license or applicable provisions of law. The Licensee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State from all claims arising out of the Licensee's use of the above described waters whether such claims are asserted by civil action or otherwise. 8. The Licensee shall not without the commissioner's prior written consent: a) assign, conveyor otherwise transfer this license or any interest under it; b) sublet the license corridor or any part thereof; or c) permit the use or occupancy of the license corridor or any part thereof by anyone other than the Licensee. This license shall extend to, and bind the successors, heirs, legal representatives and assigns of the Licensee, if any. The commissioner may require a party who has requested to sublet, use or occupy the license corridor to obtain a separate license from the State prior to occupying or using the license corridor. 9. No delay by the State in enforcing any of the conditions of this license shall operate as a waiver of any of its rights. 10. Placement and Marking of Lines: A. In over crossings of public waters, lines shall have a minimum clearance of 25 feet above extreme high water, unless otherwise approved by the Regional Operations Supervisor. B. As directed by the Regional Operations Supervisor, marker spheres shall be placed on overhead utility lines directly above the protected water. C. Any cable or conduit located at a shoreline shall be sufficiently buried at the shoreline so as to prevent its becoming exposed during droughts or winter drawdowns. D. As directed by the Regional Operations Supervisor, underwater crossings shall be marked by permanent signs on the banks at points where the line enters and leaves the protected water. 1 I. Unless otherwise authorized by the Regional Operations Supervisor, shut-off valves shall be installed within a pipeline on each side of the water crossing to provide an effective means of halting the release of product or effluent from the line into the surface waters in the event of a line rupture. 12. To protect fish spawning activities, the commissioner may prohibit work in the stream or work within a specified distance of the protected water during the spawning season. 13. Licensee must minimize disturbance to natural streambed and shoreline vegetation, including trees and shrubs. Allowable clearing of banks, shorelines and land adjacent to them is restricted to the minimum necessary for equipment to complete the installation; banks, shorelines and land adjacent to them should not be cleared to the full right-of-way width. 14. The beds of the waters described above shall, upon completion of construction or maintenance operations therein, be restored as nearly as practicable to their original cross-section. Extreme care shall be exercised to assure that the contours and elevations of the streambed are not changed by this installation in any manner that would alter the runout elevation of any public waters basins located upstream of the crossing. 15. Erosion: A. Erosion control measures shall be employed to stabilize the banks. Where necessary to prevent erosion, streambeds shall be permanently riprapped with natural rock having an average diameter of 12 inches. B. Erosion control measures shall be adequately designed for site characteristics. They may include staked hay bales, sediment fences or contouring and shaping. They shall be installed prior to commencement and maintained throughout the project. All erosion control fences next to a water body shall run parallel to the contours. C. Under low flow conditions, the work, as approved by the commissioner, shall be done to minimize erosion and siltation caused by construction. D. If downstream bank erosion commences, immediate erosion control measures shall be taken and the Regional Operations Supervisor notified immediately. E. Any work below water level shall be encircled by a flotation sediment curtain or other suitable sediment containment device to prevent sediment from being transported beyond the excavation area. F. All disturbed areas shall be stabilized as soon as possible following construction. Topsoil shall be used to re- dress disturbed soil areas, and indigenous plant species should be used, whenever possible, to revegetate disturbed areas. This revegetation should occur as early in the season as possible to permit adequate regrowth. G. Excavated materials shall not be deposited or stored alongside a protected water in a manner where the materials can be redeposited into the protected water by reasonably expected high water or storm run-off. 16. Unless otherwise authorized by the Regional Operations Supervisor, the Licensee shalI not apply herbicides or pesticides to the water in the course of construction or maintenance of the utility line. 17. Emergency repairs and replacements may be made without prior notification to the Regional Operations Supervisor by the Licensee according to conditions and standards prescribed by Minnesota Rules, Chapter 6135 and the method of instalIation identified in this license. The Licensee shall notify the Regional Operations Supervisor of this activity as soon as practicable. 18. The Licensee shall contact the Regional Operations Supervisor 10 days prior to installation and within 10 days following completion of licensed work for compliance inspection. 19. This license is subject to the SPECIAL PROVISIONS attached hereto (if none, state none). None. 20. The Regional Operations Supervisor is Paul Purman at DNR Lands and Minerals; 1200 Warner Road; St. Paul, MN 55106. Phone (651) 772-7942. Any questions about this license shall be directed to the Regional Operations Supervisor. ACCEPTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED STATE OF MINNESOTA City of Farminl!ton Licensee(s) By Title: Regional Operations Supervisor By Title By Title Form approved by the Office of the Attorney General 01102 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us ~' U TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator {j) FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Approve Assessment Agreement - Ash Street Project DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION Doug and Jessica Peterson, 3828 220th Street (Ash Street), have petitioned for connection to the recently installed sanitary sewer and water on Ash Street. DISCUSSION Doug and Jessica Peterson, the owners of the property at 3828 220th Street, have requested that the connection fees for the sewer and water be assessed. Allowing the connection fees to be assessed is consistent with the City's practice of working with property owners that have annexed into the City. The proposed assessment agreement is attached. BUDGET IMPACT The amount that would be assessed for 3828 220th Street is $8,150.00. This amount will be assessed against the property over a ten year period accruing interest at the rate of five percent per annum. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the Assessment Agreements between the City of Farmington and Doug and Jessica Peterson, the owners of the property at 3828 220th Street. Respectfully submitted, ~>>1~ Lee M. Mann, P .E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT (Parcel ID 14-23750-052-00) THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made this _ day of , 2006, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") with offices at 325 Oak Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024, and DOUG PETERSON and JESSICA PETERSON, husband and wife, whose address is 3828 220th Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024 ("Owners"). Recitals: A. The Owners own the real property located in Dakota County legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Subject Property"), also referred to as Parcel Identification number 14-23750-052-00; and B. The Subject Property shall be assessed costs, fees and charges associated with the sanitary sewer and water service connection to the Subject Property. The service connections of sanitary sewer and water benefit the Subject Property; and C. The actual costs, fees and charges to be assessed against the Subject Property ("Assessments") are set forth on Exhibit "B". NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Subject Property is hereby assessed by the City for the Assessments. The total Assessments are: $8,150.00. The foregoing amount shall be assessed against the Subject Property over a ten (10) year period accruing interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum. The Assessments shall not exceed the amounts set forth on Exhibit "B". 127259 1 2. The Assessments shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The Owners, by signing this Agreement, acknowledge that all procedural and substantive objections to the Assessment are hereby waived unconditionally, such waiver includes any rights of Owners, their successors or assigns to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the Subject Property. The Owners further waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. S 429.081. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Kevan A. Soderberg, Mayor By: Peter J. Herlofsky, City Administrator Doug Peterson Jessica Peterson STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2006, by Kevan A. Soderberg and Peter J. Herlofsky, the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 127259 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2006, by Doug Peterson husband of Jessica Peterson. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2006, by Jessica Peterson, wife of Doug Peterson. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan,MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/cjh 127259 3 EXHIBIT" A" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Subject Property: The North 200 feet of Lot 5, except the West 19 feet and except the East 90 feet ofthe West 109 feet of the North 151 feet thereof, and except the East 90 feet ofthe West 109 feet ofthe South 49 feet of the North 200 feet of Lot 5, Alex Empey's Addition to Farmington, Dakota County, Minnesota 127259 4 EXHIBIT "B" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT Ash Street Utility and Reconstruction Project Sewer and Water Utility Connection fees (Not including lateral benefit costs) Sewer Metro Sewer Availability Charge City Sewer Availability Charge Connection Permit Charge Septic Abandonment Permit Charge $ 1,550.00 $ 420.00 $ 70.00 $ 60.00 Total Sewer $ 2,100.00 Water Reserve Capacity Connection (WAC) Water Treatment Plant Fee Water Meter (5/8) Connection Permit Charge $ $ $ $ 745.00 620.00 285.00 70.00 Total Water $ 1,720.00 Dakota County Assessment Fee $ 30.00 Service Connection $4,300.00 Total Assessed $ 8,150.00 127259 5 COc- City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, Council Mem~... rs, City Administrator .~ Lee Smick, AICP City Planner TO: SUBJECT: Amend CUP Mining Operation ISD # 192 DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION Independent School District #192 is requesting an amendment to its recently approved conditional use permit (CUP) to mine sand (borrow pit) from its Meadowview Elementary School property and haul the material to the new Farmington High School location west of Flagstaff Avenue and south of 200th Street (Exhibit A). The request is being made because the volume of sand within the proposed borrow pit grading limits was miscalculated. Instead of 60,000 cubic yards, the School District's grading contractor determined upon further review that there were 120,000 cubic yards of sand to mine from the 5.8 acre borrow pit (Exhibit B). While more material will be mined and trips from this site will increase, the proposed amendment will not change the approved grading limits and restoration plan for the Meadowview site and will reduce the amount of material that will need to be brought to the new high school site from other locations. DISCUSSION The Planning Commission reviewed the amendment to the CUP on September 13, 2006. The Commissioners recommended approval with a 4-0 vote. The original CUP for the borrow pit was recommended for approval on July 11, 2006 by the Planning Commission and was approved at a public hearing by the City Council on July 17, 2006. In August, the bid package for grading the borrow pit site was awarded to Enebak Construction Company of Northfield. While preparations to begin mining the sand from the borrow pit were being started, Enebak discovered that a mistake occurred with the original volume calculation of sand that was in the borrow pit. It was determined that there were 120,000 cubic yards of sand within the original borrow pit grading limits. The grading limits will remain the same; there will just be more sand to mine from the site because of the correction to the volume calculation. Because of the initial miscalculation, the School District is required to amend its approved CUP. The mining will continue to occur in the southeastern portion of the Meadowview Elementary School property at 6100 195th Street West (Exhibit C). Because of the new volume calculation of 120,000 cubic yards of sand, an additional 3,000 truckloads of material will be hauled from the site (Exhibit D). After approval of the original CUP, the DNR and Dakota County Transportation suggested a new haul route that would reduce adverse impacts to the Middle Creek drainage area along the original route and shorten the travel length on Flagstaff Avenue, thereby, being less disruptive to the residents in the area (Exhibit E). The new haul route has been approved by both agencies and is currently being constructed 860 feet south of the original route (Exhibit F). The City Engineer and City Attorney also approved the modified haul route and have agreed that the new haul route may be utilized immediately because of the approval by the agencies. Enebak has submitted a letter discussing the construction of the haul route (Exhibit G). The new haul route continues to be located on School District property since the School Board has not yet approved a proposed real estate transaction involving the nearby Donnelly property. The School District has requested that the borrow pit remain open until December 15, 2006 rather than the original closing date of November 1, 2006 (Exhibit B). This request has been made because of the late start to the mining operation. The erosion control measures at the borrow pit are currently being installed by Enebak. Lee Mann approved the grading plan for the borrow pit on September 1ih. The School District's contractor, (Enebak) has received approval to mine 60,000 cubic yards of sand from the borrow pit at this time through the approval of the original CUP on July 17, 2006. However, no additional material may be mined beyond the originally approved 60,000 cubic yards unless or until the City Council approves an amended CUP. Flagstaff A venue Road Closure As stated above, the haul route from the borrow pit to the new high school site will require the closure of Flagstaff Avenue near the new high school site. The boundaries of the road closure will be from the curve at CR 64 to the south side of the high school property (Exhibit E). During the closure, the roadway will only be open to construction vehicles and local traffic including farm equipment. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the amended Conditional Use Permit for mining of a borrow pit at the southeastern portion of the Meadowview Elementary School property, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is allowed to mine 120,000 cubic yards from the borrow pit. 2. The applicant must obtain final City approval of the mining operation and the rough grading plan from the City Engineer. 3. The applicant must pay any applicable fees, provide adequate surety in an amount and form approved by the Director of Public Works, and comply with any other reasonable conditions imposed by the Director of Public Works. 4. All excavation activities must be consistent with plans submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works. Respectfully submitte --7 C ~_. Lee Smick, AICP City Planner Ex. A City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us II CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION II Address: / ~f) 41112 i/2/ ~/;1t1cf- Street / ~p #/'12 Telephone: <ffjJ' cfi3 -f){J/J2 Fax: 6fI LftJ-60~ I it' fat/to!- ~AM>1II~ AlAi 551L<! Stre t City I State Zip Code remises Involved: A/8i1J f/JIf'..11IiI~/ 1114-11 :;2~?l? 7 Ill! Address/Legal Description (lot, block, plat name, section, township, range) /2-/ Telephone: ~ t/tf'- ,/}OltFax: c6f!J t/63-it11/1 ;:i1111//I1P'}/! 4/.;f 651J~t/ City State Zip Code Applicant: Owner: Address: Current Zoning District ture of Applicant ~1LA-j L.. -'I3oJJ AiL r '~'tIff Date Request Submitted to Planning staff on Public Hearing Set for: For office use only Advertised in Local Newspaper: Planning Commission Action: _Approved City Council Action (if necessary): _Approved Denied Denied - Comments: Conditions Set: Planning division: Date: 01/05 Northfield Minnesota Land SUNeying Civil Engineering Geotechnical Engineering Construction Material Testing Envrronrnental Sennces 1604 Riverview Lane Northfield, MN 55057 Tel. 507.645.0964 Fax. 507.645.2842 e-mail. mlC@mbi-nf.com Established 1995 August 30, 2006 r..r~D"-).cg @cgD WI ~~- I d, ;/ -.-. ~ . 1i 'I' ,- ;! it! I fAUG ') :;! f.. ~ t' ,) iU \} L~-~~~~~_~_~____l!__ Er'<oB Ms. Lee Smick, AICP City Planner - City of Farmington 325 Oak. Street Farmington, MN 55024 ~'''''''=-~~~''~'''',=-=".." __...........~"~.o.., ~ ~ Re: Meadowview Elementary Borrow Pit Volumes Dear Ms. Smick; Discussions with the contractor for the Farmington High School have indicated that they estimate that granular material in excess of 120,000 cy may be excavated from the proposed borrow pit site. This is considerably higher than the 60,000 cy estimated earlier. We would like to amend our CUP application to include this higher volume estimate. We also anticipate that the Borrow Pit will be open later than the November I date listed. We would like to extend the Borrow Pit closure time until December 15. We will still maintain the proposed site boundary of the Borrow Pit Grading Plan and excavations will be completed above the water table. Mark Osborn, P .E. Geotechnical Engineer Cc: Doug Bonar Lee Mann ~ N --~- ~~._ L~l= ~ ......- '*' - '*'..- "'fl -,.-..,,- ..-........---. ..--.-..--- _.-.....--~. - ---.--...-...., ..iml5.... ~ JtlJI"MI lit' ~....... . i I~;~I I d II II !J a i I I I I ~ ~ II 0 I I C> Z Vi Ul o cr (J ~ w w cr (J ml' i ~_/// '?:'[$ ~ ~ l n _" ~ '( (J- i) ~-\! ! ~ v r-';, I ~/W~I I I \ ~~ ! \ I I ~ /~ .. .... .:.'..."...i7,.:f.':'J':'....'... ,- f'9.1f'9i? M.."f'.09.00S ex.C) --- ~"""'KlII N~ 'NO.wNI~ijV.:I Slid MO~~08 - aSI NOl~NI~~V.:l avo~ lnVH ~ _.... ~ ~ l5 13 B~ i ~ ~ 2! ; i~~ ~ ~l!; ~'!i ~l;; i El~" ,/ ;.J Z Z ~ Z 15a.J~ :! n~ ~~ ~w 2 ~~i ~ ~!l; ~~ z~ ;Iii ~~e ~ ~8 ;~ ~~ ~~ Ill~~~ e 8~ li'~ 1i~ 1io ~"zi5 ~ ~~ ~!! ~~~ ~~ .,~~~ l ~ ~: i: i~: U ~~I~ ; !il ~g 8~ 8~~ 8i5 8~i58 ~ ..= N ,.) ..t-.n cD 0,,'0 ~~ ~~ "'~ I~ ..-. . , "". = -' =' "" "" '" ""0 BORROW PIT LOCATION ex. IF = CJ ~ D D q, 4;~ '~,,~ h__ ~-~~ " 'OQ ~ ~ Qc: Meadowview Elementary Cl FlA~[) ~A'P ~~t/Il~ ~/M/r +/- 200' .) CJ <:) o New High School Site tl ,. .0; "0 ~ N e~r Lee Smick rom: ent: To: Subject: Jim Dockstader [JimD@enebak.com] Wednesday, September 13,20067:10 AM Lee Smick FW: Flagstaff Ave. / CSAH 64 <1-,_' *:. -----Original Message----- From: McConnell, Gordon [mailto:Gordon.McConnell@CO.DAKOTA.MN.US] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:18 PM To: Jim Dockstader Subject: Flagstaff Ave. / CSAH 64 Jim, I have reviewed the new plans and traffic control layout for the haul road onto Flagstaff Ave./CSAH 64. I just had two changes to the signing so I called Mark at Safety Signs and he will make those changes. The new haul road location is fine and maybe in a better location because the traffic can still use the County Road part of this area. I will attach this new information to the permit I already issued and you are ok to proceed. Thanks! Butch McConnell 1 EX .' 6- enEBRIS conSTRUCTion COl'lPSDV ~~"""""'w""""""'_:li:i'i\~~~~"~~"==<-"'''"''''dt''i;f....i~~"~ ~'if~~ P.O. Box 458 . Northfield, Minnesota 55057 . 507-645-8962 612-333-1307 September 8, 2006 Mr. David Sanocki City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 RE: Farmington High School- Flagstaff Haul Route Dear Sir: Enebak Construction is proposing to use a portion of Flagstaff Ave. in the city of Farmington as a haul route for the Farmington High School grading project. I've enclosed a plan showing our proposed entrance onto Flagstaff Avenue, a map showing the proposed haul route, and a traffic control plan. Weare proposing to fill a short portion of the ditch within the right of way in the area shown on the plan. We will use temporary culverts as necessary to maintain drainage for the existing ditch south of our proposed haul road fill. Since the road is scheduled for improvements in the near future, the hauling would be done with 40 ton off-road trucks that would obviously be over current axle weight limits set by the county and city. Enebak agrees to maintain the road for local traffic during hauling and restore the road to its present condition when the hauling is complete. Estimated duration of our hauling operations is from September 25th through December 15th. Please let me know if this is acceptable for the City of Farmington. Sin?C0ft Jim Dockstader, V.P. of Operations/General Manager 32825 Northfield Blvd Northfield, MN 55057 ~6 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council members, City Administrator 0 Robin Roland, Finance Director FROM: SUBJECT: Consider Resolution - Certification of Delinquent Municipal Services to 2007 Tax Rolls DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION The City's municipal servIces (utilities) expenence delinquent accounts similar to private enterprises. DISCUSSION Minnesota State Statutes 444.075 grants municipalities the authority to certify delinquent utility accounts to property owners' real estate taxes as a special assessment for collection. This statute provides the City with the ability to collect unpaid accounts without incurring significant administrative costs. All property owners with delinquent utility bills (over 90 days overdue) were mailed notices and may pay their delinquent amount by October 18, 2006 to avoid certification. The notice advised delinquent utility customers that the City Council would consider this item on September 18, 2006 at a public hearing. BUDGET IMPACT At the time of notice, accounts in the total amount of $166,661.02 were outstanding. Payments have been received and applied to account balances in the interim. Only those accounts with delinquent balances remaining after October 18, 2006 would be certified to the tax rolls as a one- year special assessment. ACTION REQUIRED Adopt the attached resolution certifying the delinquent accounts as special assessments to the 2007 taxes of the appropriate properties. 7-;Z;~ Robin Roland Finance Director RESOLUTION R - 06 CERTIFYING DELINQUENT MUNICIPAL SERVICE ACCOUNTS TO THE DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER/AUDITOR Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council and the city of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 18th day of September 2006 at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, the City has provided sewer, water, storm water and solid waste removal services to users of the municipal utilities; and WHEREAS, the City has invoiced these users for the services and payment on some of these invoices is delinquent; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 444.075 allows the City to certify charges associated with the municipal services as special assessments with the County Auditor, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Farmington, that: 1. Delinquent charges associated with the municipal services shall be certified to the County Auditor for collection as special assessments. 2. The special assessments shall be due and payable over a term of one (1) year at an annual rate offive (5.5) percent. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 18th day of September 2006. Mayor Clerk! Administrator /00.. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director RE: Approve Master Plans for Daisy Knoll Park, Westview Park, Dakota County Estates Park and Mystic Meadows Second Addition Park DA TE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION A public input process was undertaken in May 2006 for developing master plans for Daisy Knoll Park, Westview Park, Dakota County Estates Park and the Mystic Meadows Second Addition Park (the Parks). DISCUSSION Paul Paige, Lill Latham and Amy Bower from Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. (the Consultant) worked with City staff and residents of the community in developing park master plans for the Parks. The process included both staff members and resident's input being solicited through a series of three public meetings. Attached are the master plans for the Parks that were created through the public input process (Exhibit A). The Consultant will be making a presentation to the City Council that summarizes the park improvements identified in the master plans and will review the estimated costs associated with these improvements. The first public meeting occurred on May 23, 2006. Residents whose homes either abut the park or are across the street from the park were mailed an invitation to attend the meeting and provide comments on the first draft that was created by Parks and Recreation Department staff and the Consultant. Along with the invitation to attend this first public open house, residents who were unable to attend were asked to complete and return a questionnaire to City staff that solicited feedback on what park features they would like to see in each of the parks. In addition to the questionnaire being mailed with the invitation, residents were also informed that they could access the City's web site for the questionnaire and provide input electronically. Turnout at the meeting and returned questionnaires was low. A packet was mailed to the same residents for a June 20,2006 public meeting that included: a second draft of the park master plans, an invitation to attend the second public meeting and a questionnaire. In addition, the second draft of the park master plans and questionnaire were posted to the City's web site for the general public and residents who lived around the park to review and provide comments on. Turn out at the second public meeting and return of questionnaires increased primarily for Daisy Knoll Park. A packet was mailed to the same residents for a Wednesday, August 9th Park and Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) meeting that included a third draft ofthe park master plans and an invitation to attend the PRAC meeting to provide further feedback/input on the park master plans. At the August 9th PRAC meeting the improvements identified in the master plans for the Parks were reviewed and additional input was provided by both PRAC members and by residents who attended the meeting. The master plans for the Parks that have been submitted as Exhibit A have been unanimously approved by the PRAC and are being forwarded to the City Council for approval. BUDGET IMPACT Attached in Exhibit B are spreadsheets of improvement cost estimates for the Parks. The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) will be updated to reflect the final improvement costs shown for the Parks assuming the City Council does not revise/amend any of the master plans. ACTION REQUESTED By motion approve master plans for Daisy Knoll Park, Westview Park, Dakota County Estates Park and Mystic Meadows Second Addition Park. Respectfull y Submitted, 1< ~ Randy ~ad, Parks and Recreation Director ~\;. ~~4- ft West vie w Par k . EXISTING PARK FEATURES TRAIL EXTENSION TO HIGH SCHOOL . 5-12 PLAYGROUND AND S'MNGS . 1/2 COURT BASKETBALL . PARK BENCHES AND PICNIC TABLES . PAVED TRAIL . BOCCE BALL COURT . SAND VOLLEYBALL . NEW PARK SIGN (2005) i ~\:-:.. . 5-12 PLAYGROUND AND S'MNGS TO REMAIN . 2.5PLAYGROUND . FULL COURT BASKETBALL . PICNIC SHELTER . PICNIC TABLES & GRILLS . ADDITIONAL SHADE TREES . TRAIL ON SOUTH PARK EDGE ALONG HICKORY STREET . TRAIL CONNECTION NORTH TO HIGH SCHOOL . SMALL PARK SIGN AT NORTH EDGE OF PARK . RAIN GARDEN DEFINES EAST PARK BOUNDARY """" :: !r HIGH SCHOO~ .1 II Ii ' FUTURE POSSIBILITIES HIGH SCHOOL FIELDS o fL) (-. L I I r ~~ 'j .l -, .-1 oil ~ n ., r-r--- i ~ / / PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE Master Plan City Council, September 18, 2006 KEY ~ EXISTING SHADE TREE - PROPOSED SHADE TREE ~ EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TURF r.;, '1 RAIN GARDEN ~ WASTE CONTAINER ~ BIKE RACK ~ BENCH .. PICNIC TABLE & GRILL ~ 'MLD ROSE SHRUB BED PARK SIZE: 1.8 ACRES - SMALL PARK SIGN . FULL COURT BASKET BALL " .... WILD ROSE SHRUB BED TO DEFINE WES BOUNDARY ') / 2.5 PLAY AREA PICNIC SHELTER. TABLES AND GRILLS ORIENTED TO BE USED BY BOTH PARK USERS AND SPECTATORS AT EVENTS ON ADJACENT HIGH SCHOOL FIELDS EXISTING 5-12 PLAY AREA & SWINGS EXISTING SHADE LAWN ~~~:;,;.:::;.-;.= --, l EXISTING PARK SIGN ~ ,,;;'.r- 1 ---J r /c'. ~~f~Y" I L...... - . \\ \~ .\ !n_ II \0 r""... J ::.=.-:::_-;:;;. ~ " - Farmington, Minnesota HoisinJ,.,rton Kuq~lerGroup.lnc. mil E)(k\b~f- D West View Park Farmington, Minnesota Preliminary Cost Estimate: based on September 18, 2006 master plan Prepared by Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Description Qty. Unit Unit Totals Price General Improvements secondary park sign 1 Each $ 850 $850 park bench 4 Each $ 875 $3,500 waste container 1 Each $ 350 $350 subtotal $4,700 Pedestrian Circulation paved trail connection to high school 733 LF $ 22 $16,126 trails within park 240 LF $ 22 $5,280 subtotal $21,406 Picnic Area demolition, sand volleyball / bocce ball court 1 LS $ 1,000 $1,000 shelter 1 LS $ 31,500 $31,500 picnic tables 4 EA $ 1,300 $5,200 grills 2 EA $ 450 $900 subtotal $38,600 Basketball Court demolition, existing 1/2 court basketball 1 LS $ 1,000 $1,000 full court basketball including 2 hoops and player's benches 1 LS $ 16,000 $16,000 subtotal $17,000 Playground 2-5 play container, safety mulch & equipment installed 1 LS $ 20,000 $20,000 subtotal $20,000 Landscaping shade trees 4 EA $ 350 $1 ,400 evergreen trees 1 EA $ 400 $400 shrubs 50 EA $ 60 $3,000 rain garden 1 LS $ 2,500 $2,500 turf seeding allowance 1 LS $ 1,000 $1,000 subtotal $8,300 construction subtotal $110,006 15% construction contingency $16,501 Total I $126,507 C:IDocuments and SettingslrdistadlLocal SettingslTemporary Internet FileslOLK7DI060918 West View Cost Estimate9/8/2006 I "- .. ,~. 1. 4 rt.) t1 "Tl m . " o~~mo~~>~z~~~~~~~ c: >< m -i ~~~ifi5~ en -< gg5~~~~o~moo~~~~m c: ~4~~~cmQ^Q~~mr~<~ ;:a ~am~8~ -i ~~ 00 ~ 00 " --< " " m ~ ~~~ ~~oo~oo~ooOo~Q~ m Z ';; m 0 C ;0 ;0 >< ~~5o~ ~~~~~8ga~~ "tl ()<OOOC~ C'l 2;0 m en 2 2 ;0 0 0 Vi iii ~~~~~~ :x:C ~ --< () 0 ." ;g ;g --< --< o::o-dQr)> mm :::o:::oc-< 0 ~ mOO m :x: Z Z mc~~~ rQ8~~~~Oam CIl r;;~;=6~~ offl () ~ en en CIl ;:a () m m Gl Gl oo_m:!i enm enm--<~C 0 '" 0 Ooor~ :x: o,,;O~en2 !; iii OJ acne " :!io 00 0 0 m en F ~~a 2 r m rii $ :~~~ ~ ~~ r~O ~ ;= "Tl ~ C ;i m < en m 2 .. m :x: ;0 0 :r:(J')O m r- -t m ::::j )>00 :Ill 0 Z ;0 )> Gl m m~~~ go;~ ~ ~ r)> ~ " m m Gl 0 in rr -i Gl ;0 --< ."r CIl ;0 ;0 ;0 ;0 m m ;0 g;z~:2 ~ ~ r d CIl i'ii c: N ;= m --< m m ;:a !'!' r ;0 2 ~O:::oZ m 0 ::tI r m m --< m 0 m ~ 2 m ;0 ~~~~ ~ ~ CIl --< ;0 m )> m m ~)>~5 ~ m n m r-Z' Z m ~ :Ill .-0 Q z m '" CIl g ;2 ~ .., . ~bel~ ",r;~~ ffi~~ ,-"'- cmo L. ~~i' m ~~ oJ ~-7"" j ..J I ~. 0=". 1 1 ffi~ r 6~ z Gl 'TI ~ III .. 3 I,. :J r CC - 0 I :J I ~. t. I ~-- . 3: I :0: <( ~ :J 1f :J ':)- /~ '" ~ CD (II O>OCl> aJ~""CI>i5 ~ ~~~ o "'::I: 0 ~-tm~~ 11i! - ~g~ ~ '< ~ IZl III mO. ~a~~~ ",:rm;o;:!! F~g;ll ~moP m ,..- ",0 00 C"U z.... o~ ~1" '" ~I CCl> Z::I: 0;0 mC ;00> ,,!CI> ::I: .... CCl>;o zG)~ oZo lH~ -, 0""C'TlZ ~~~:i (j)G'Jm"tl ~g~~ ~.5~g G'J m V'=o 3: -3: ~ "'~ Z .... ...L...- ~s: ~~ ~~ z.... 0::1: ","U ;:!!O .-z fAn ....." SMJqW3 ., .....- r-.--., -, ~~ 0'" ~~ ~~ z~ "'0 ,Y \!1 if ! (jj J- --< z '" L .... ~ 1" I \t1 K Y"; o --~ f ~ D ~ ~ = ::l l'") ::::.: . CI) .g ..... S ?r~ ., en .CZ & ~~ 0:'> o,::l f')Lh,bit- B Dakota County Estates Farmington, Minnesota Preliminary Cost Estimate: based on September 18, 2006 master plan Prepared by Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Description Qty. Unit Unit Totals Price General Improvements primary park sign and associated landscaping 1 Each $ 3,200 $3,200 park sign and associated landscaping relocation 1 Each $ 1,600 $1,600 park bench 2 Each $ 875 $1,750 waste container 1 Each $ 350 $350 waste container pad relocation 1 Each $ 250 $250 secu rity IIg ht 1 Each $ 4,100 $4,100 subtotal $11,250 Pedestrian Circulation 8' bituminous trails 1,720 LF $ 22 $37,840 subtotal $37,840 Picnic Area shelter 1 LS $ 31,500 $31,500 picnic tables 4 LS $ 1,300 $5,200 grills 2 EA $ 450 $900 subtotal $37,600 Basketball Court demolition, existing 1/2 court basketball and sand volleyball 1 LS $ 1,500 $1,500 full court basketball including 2 hoops and player's benches 1 LS $ 16,000 $16,000 subtotal $17,500 Playground 2-5 play container, safety mulch & equipment installed 1 LS $ 20,000 $20,000 5-12 play equipment, safety mulch installed 1 LS $ 35,000 $35,000 subtotal $55,000 Landscaping shade trees 18 EA $ 350 $6,300 evergreen trees 10 EA $ 400 $4,000 shrubs 40 EA $ 60 $2,400 turf seeding allowance 1 LS $ 2,000 $2,000 subtotal $14,700 Construction subtotal $173,890 15% construction contingency $26,084 Total I $199,974 C:\Documents and SettingslrdistadlLocal Settings I Temporary Internet Fi/eslOLK7D\060918 Dakota County Estates Cost Estimate9/8/2006 . . /1 I'" ~ ~ ~ ~ " . r .. III ~ o m ~ 6 ~ 5 -< ::Ii II~ " " ~ ~ ;0 " in g m o (JJ :I: i!; m -< ;0 m m (JJ .;, 0 .;, :u ~ ~ .;, .:. '" ;, '" ~ " ;'Ii ~5S;~o;u~5?m~~~es~(/) r->~)>);~;o;=-l()-l 3:zm ~G')~~1J;xJm(f)8;om ~:r:(')N ~~g~jI~~ 3:~ ~~::; ~;:oz~~oc.n (/)0 mm)>o (Il00",,,- -< Z o"z )>~mo" ~ (Il orO F(f)Oz)io)> s ~:!ic () ~Q;U::::! r ~mQ o ")>0 0 g c-<::t c ~5a z z ~orri '" zz r G) -<00 -l -lG)~ ~ Z -^CJ> Z CJ -5""" &,::tlz m Z () iii ~~o G) 3! 5 oOz CJ'J m CJ) V' m ~ ~ :;: ~ 5 (1 ~ -l -< -l m "T1 I ~~ dog"'. '" 0 "':>J ~~~~ ~~~~ ..mm(n t;:::~~ )10.......... o~~ "'00 m",,,, "'mm CIlCll ;. :u ~ .;, .;, .:. .;, :>J ;, :>J .:. " ;'Ii "'8~o~~~~rn~~~~;;J'" )>>^:ii;=O-lo-t ~zm ~~:gesmcn~8::Orn S::I:~"" . ,....;0>::0 m en ~~o 2l~~orn )>~5 mm)> m:::O':- -l ~ Z 01JZ Oo:U 0 )> (Il orO CZ~ ~ S :!:~c =ijG)^;;j r :!:mG) ;:)>2 0 g C-<::t maG) Z Z ~orri ~Z(l) r- G) ~oo cn~~ g 2 ,,<:jm O)io~ ~ p o~~ ~~cn a c ~PJr- G");oz z ~ Oo!! mo~ c.n G) ~ ~ ~~C5 (f) ~ g r= r ~ -I ~ g ~ 0 !lJ -< t5 ~ ~ ~ I zoo ~ o ;:0 ;U q -'T I -.-.-.- - -'-'-'- _._.-I~~H - - -~-~- ~.. ~ 'PH ql-d puow_/o ..m,n~ "".-. ~ ~ -" 8~ ~~- oGl m' (JJ I I I I I I I I I I I I I ::;O:Jl"'O ::;OCh"O o:;;~ OO~ i!;!" i!;S;;; ;0 :I:- o om d i~ ~:i "z .. " Gl :I: ~ ; ~ . f ." III .., 3 ::::l ca - 0 f. ::::l S' "" 3: ii O-U""lJ:I:;-" . T. g~g8~ ~ ::::l g: ". ~CJoOO <; ::::l (JJ Ill~(JJ~ill " ~ Cl) 0 U~~~ -< l' (II (JJ ~ 0 -< ~.;u ~ ill ~o~~o 118 - r"'T1... ;p C"-'-< 11& III F :I: If Jee.4S lI"no.lClI poot/.IGqqtJ/eu lUn,n;l 0"" Om)> zr:>J no" rn~~ ~o:s ~E~ m~~ C_m ;=zo ~~&; Po)> "T1zen ~~~ ~Qm O::to \<1-<" o.CIJ -i .-::t ,,:>Jm iii22):o r-G):>J 0)>-< ~~tD 0)> zr . r " C -< c: '" m ." o CIl '" ijj E ::I m f(> tr ~'Ii ~8~g F~ "Tl"T1-t r- ~-~n~ ~o.-, - Q- .. -- .....-1'"-~ ~'-0 ;;u o~..... ~Q!!i-< ~ d~ 'r ~~~~ :il m ;::~IllO r- 8 el f- -IT\r~ ~ ~ ~offi _r-8~ ~fi 0-< o gj~zs; G')-tO<-t m~5~ 05~ I I I ~+.+ I I I .../......f- .-.-{ -j -j -j -j -.., .~~ . . "0 I I '"' S ~~ ....("J) <:Xl'"' . q ~:32 c~ O\:::l --- a ~ Q c: :::l r"\ .... - \ fA )(.. ~ ". ~ ...- --+- ~ EKh\b~ t- ~ Mystic Meadows Farmington, Minnesota Preliminary Cost Estimate: based on September 18, 2006 master plan Prepared by Hoisington Koegler Group Inc Description Qty. Unit Unit Totals Price PHASE 1 General Improvements site preparation and grading 1 LS $ 200,000 $200,000 primary park sign and associated landscaping 1 Each $ 3,200 $3,200 secondary park sign 1 Each $ 850 $850 concession and restroom building 1 LS $ 125,000 $125,000 concrete pavers in central area around concession bldg 12,500 SF $6.00 $75,000 equipment storage shed (1,200 SF) 1 LS $ 55,000 $55,000 park bench 8 Each $ 875 $7,000 waste container 6 Each $ 350 $2,100 bike racks 1 Each $ 500 $500 general park lighting 1 LS $ 100,000 $100,000 subtotal $568,650 Vehicular Circulation & Parking park access road (with curb and gutter) 1,200 LF $ 100 $120,000 west parking lot (bituminous with concrete curbing) 1 LS $ 115,000 $115,000 central parking lot 1 LS $ 65,000 $65,000 parking lot storm sewer allowance 1 LS $ 80,000 $80,000 subtotal $380,000 Pedestrian Circulation 8' bituminous trails 7,100 LF $ 22 $156,200 subtotal $156,200 Picnic Areas shelter 2 LS $ 47,750 $95,500 picnic tables 10 LS $ 1,300 $13,000 grills 4 EA $ 450 $1,800 water source/drinking fountain/spigot 2 EA $ 5,250 $10,500 subtotal $120,800 Ball fields adult softball field with 300' foul line including: outfield and foul line fencing, players benches, skinned infield, turf care, irrigation, bleachers, lighting 4 EA $175,000 $700,000 subtotal $7~0I00li Landscaping Landscaping 1 LS $ 65,000 $65,000 prairie areas 1.5 AC $ 5,200 $7,800 turf seeding allowance (excluding field areas) 6 AC $ 3,500 $21,000 subtotal $93,800 Construction subtotal $2,019,450 15% construction contingency $302,918 Construction total $2,322,368 Design and Engineering Soft Costs (12% of construction) $278,684 Phase 1 Total $2,601,052 H..\Park master planninglMystic Meadows Cost Estimate 09.08.069/8/2006 hkSb, bi,~ B PHASE 2 General Improvements site preparation and grading 1 LS $ 200,000 $200,000 primary park sign and associated landscaping 1 Each $ 3,200 $3,200 secondary park sign 2 Each $ 850 $1,700 concession and restroom building 1 LS $ 125,000 $125,000 concrete pavers in central area around concession bldg 12,500 SF $6.00 $75,000 park bench 10 Each $ 875 $8,750 waste container 6 Each $ 350 $2,100 bike racks 2 Each $ 500 $1,000 general park lighting 1 LS $ 100,000 $100,000 subtotal $516,750 Vehicular Circulation & Parking park access road (with curb, gutter, and storm sewer) 900 LF $ 100 $90,000 east parking lot (bituminous with concrete curbing) 1 LS $ 175,000 $175,000 parking lot storm sewer allowance 1 LS $ 80,000 $80,000 subtotal $345,000 Pedestrian Circulation 8' bituminous trails 6,054 LF $ 22 $133,188 subtotal $133,188 Picnic Area shelter 1 LS $ 47,750 $47,750 picnic tables 6 LS $ 1,300 $7,800 grills 2 EA $ 450 $900 water source/drinking fountain/spigot 1 EA $ 5,250 $5,250 subtotal $61,700 Ball fields adult softball field with 300' foul line including: outfield and foul line fencing, players benches, skinned infield, turf care, irrigation, bleachers, lighting 4 EA $175,000 $700,000 subtotal $700,000 Basketball Court full court basketball including 2 hoops and player's benches 1 LS $ 16,000 $16,000 subtotal $16,000 Playground 2-5 yr Play equipment safety mulch, installation 1 LS $ 20,000 $20,000 5-12 yr Play equipment, safety mulch, installation 1 LS $ 40,000 $40,000 cone. play container edger 575 LF $ 16 $9,200 subtotal $69,200 Landscaping Landscaping 1 LS $ 65,000 $65,000 prairie areas 2.5 AC $ 5,200 $13,000 turf seeding allowance (excluding field areas) 6 AC $ 3,500 $21,000 subtotal $99,000 Construction subtotal $1,940,838 15% construction contingency $291,126 Construction total $2,231,964 Design and Engineering Soft Costs (12% of construction) $267,836 Phase 2 Total $2,499,799 TOTAL PHASES 1 & 2 I $5,100,851 H:IPark master planninglMystlc Meadows Cost Estimate 09.08.069/8/2006 ~ Jb7+ 4 Daisy Knoll Park Master Plan City Council- September 18, 2006 . EXISTING PARK FEATURES PARK SIZE: 25 ACRES J L..J 1.--1' -/'~ ~~-....""" C::;:; rn r _~. "~r-1;:-u.....-,......' ..i 0. a ;~. . Hmo-po'" SIDEWALK ON NORTH --,\"-1""" ........-! D-J UC] . ............. ...........,,, SIDE OF UPPER 182ND 0\" er-- k., ""-.;~ j, STREET TO CONNECT TO tJ '-...:J \ "'.. HILL DEE PARK IS PARK8OUNl),t,R'I' D I. . .~~ _~t . PLANNED AS PART OF ~ - .0\, 2f~.' ....2J.1JP. tr.t.:::::5. ..~...6~. .!p. c. :~g~~~~~ECTION \ r , ,...r-, ,......., CONSIDER STOP SIGNS: ' o. \. -.l-.-< r,.........J ~I.- I:l h ~ . THREE WAY STOP AT '" EUCLID WAY AND \,Ql. ~.~~6o- C;UbYo.Ie;-..6~) . ~~~~~j~;:T ~, . ON UPPER 183RD D', fJ Q c;i J STREETWAT \ \l~ \ _,uP~3~~~~Dr ~ EUCLID STREET 'O'~ \J ~.t;:) btbi:J. t \ I 0 n u [J-1 D.\ V/ n.1 I ~ J .......-' j f), '-<L-1 . ~ 0'\1:.,'-:(/ /) <CA. Ii.~ ~<.>> :7' -(' 'f.;../ ....;.--' ./\ q f'~/.-"\ Q . . ~6 \f,O.' <''"''. 0 " ~\, ~<. ) \ \-.1\ Farmington, . ADDITIONAL BENCHES AND TRASH RECEPTACLES . NEW PARK SIGNAGE AT TRAIL ENTRIES PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY . PAVED TRAIL CONNECTION TO UPPER 183RD ST. WEST . PAVED TRAIL LINKING EUCLID ST. TO PARK AMENITIES MEANDERS UP HILl.SIDE THROUGH THE PARK'S NATURAL AREAS . SIDEWALK ALONG EUCLID ST. NORTH TO UPPER 182ND AND SOUTH TO CONNECT TO EXISTING TRAIL AT EUCLID PATH AND PILOT KNOB RD. . CONSIDER STOP SIGNS: . THREE WAY STOP SIGN AT ESQUIRE WAY AND ESSENCE TRAlL . THREE WAY STOP AT EUCLID WAY AND ESQUIRE ST. . ON EUCLID WAY AT EUCLID ST. INTERSECTION . ON UPPER 183RD ST. W. AT EUCLID ST. . 5-12 PLAYGROUND . 1/2 COURT BASKETBALL . NEIGHBORHOOD BALL FIELD . PAVED TRAIL IN ACTIVE PORTION OF THE PARK . SLEDDING HILL . NATURAL AREA CONSISTING OF WooDSAND GRASSLANDS FUTURE POSSIBILITIES AMENITIES . NEW PLAY EQUIPMENT FOR 5-12 YEAR OLD AND 2.5 YEAR OLD WITHIN EXISTING PLAYGROUND . PICNIC SHELTER . SECURITY LIGHT BETWEEN NEW PARK SHELTER AND PLAYGROUND . IMPROVED HALF COURT BASKETBALL . NEIGHBORHOOD BALL FIELD TO REMAIN OVERALL PLAN PRAIRIE RESTORATION IN EXISTING NATURAL AREAS PARK ENTRY. PAVED TRAIL CONNECTION AND TRAIL ENTRY SIGN . BENCHES EXISTING WOODLAND AREAS MANAGED TO CONTROL INVASIVE SPECIES SUCH AS BUCKTHORN AND PRICKLY ASH EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD BALL FIELD TO REMAINAS IS AND UNPROGRAMMED EXISTING SLEDDING HIll. TO REMAIN SEE ENLARGED PlAN CONSIDER THREE WAY STOP SIGN AT ESQUIRE WAY AND ESSENCE TRAIL . . BOLLARDS ON ALL TRAILS AT STREET INTERSECTIONS TO SLOW BICYCLISTS . GATE ON PARK ROAD AT ESQUIRE WAY TO CONTROL VEHICUlAR ACCESS LANDSCAPING AND NATURAL AREAS . ENTRY GARDEN WITH PERENNIALS. SHRUBS AND LANDSCAPE BOULDERS AT ESQUIRE WAY . LANDSCAPING ALONG WATER TOWER FENCE . ADDITIONAL SHADE TREES, ORNAMENTAL TREES AND SHRUBS IN KEY LOCATIONS TRIAL PRAlRIE GARDEN ON STEEP DRAINAGE SWALE SLOPES NORTH OF WATER TOVvl:R ACCESS ROAD PRAIRIE RESTORATION AND WOODLAND MANAGEMENT IN EXISTING NATURAL AREAS SEE SECOND PAGE FOR ENLARGED PLAN FOR SOUTH PORTION OF PARK AND PLAN KEY PARK ENTRY WITH PARK SIGN. CROSSWALK CONNECTION TO SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF EUCLID STREET. SIDEWALK TO BE WITHIN THE EXISTING RIGHT.OF. WAY AND WILL LINK UPPER 182ND STREET TO THE NORTH WITH EXISTING TRAIL ON PILOT KNOB ROAD TO THE SOUTH. BENCH PAVED TRAIL MEANDERS THROUGH NATURAL AREAS OF PARK AND CONNECTS TO PARK AMENITIES. '0 l' LANDSCAPING ALONG WATER TOWER FENCE .'- TRAIL CONNECTION TO EXISTING TRAIL ON PILOT KNOB ROAD SOUTHERN PART OF PARK TO HAVE ENTRY GARDENS ON ESQUIRE WAY. IMPROVED HALF COURT BASKETBALL. UPDATED PLAY EQUIPMENT AND PICNIC SHELTER. SEE ENLARGED PLAN. Minnesota Hoisingllln KOl'J:lcrGroup.lnc. mil iSGll;rf- A Daisy Knoll Park . PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE EXISTING SHADE TREE EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE PROPOSED SHADE TREE ENLARGED PLAN SLEDOING HILL TRIAL PRAIRIE GARDEN ON STEEP SLOPES OF EXISTING DRAINAGE SWALE ENTRY GARDE '. P4R~ 1(8~. 4Ry . I I I( tl . BOLLARD AT TRAIL 'STREET INTERSECTION TO SLOW BICYCLISTS CONSIDER A THREE WAY STOP AT ESOUIRE WAY' ESSENCE TRAIL INTERSECTIONS PEDESTRIAN! CYCLIST SAFETY " ~ ".. 1.~ .~,~" ,",~~~, .::'..,...,,~. "'~:a"t'~.' " ~ J ". . ,~~" . ; W.' , ..,., Ii'. ,... ."~ <I' .!. -- - --1_ . The masler plan .'i1lg}!CSIS addin}.: a park .\'helfer. similar 10 ,his one, located at Hill Dee park for .\'hade. picnickin}!. and park pm}!rams .'iuch os "Pooh .\' PlaYKmund. .. Master Plan City Council- September 18, 2006 MJ D D II Cj ~ o ~ ~ ~ 1--- I PROPOSED SHRUBS PROPOSED TRAILS AND SIDEWALKS TURF EXISTING TRAIL PRAIRIE WASTE CONTAINER BIKE RACK WOODS BENCH PARK BOUNDARY PROPOSED TRIAL PRAIRIE GARDEN SECURITY LIGHT AND TRASH RECEPTACLE SHELTER FOR PICNICKING AND PARK PROGRAMS .::~~... , 'r~..., ; NEW PLAY EOUIPMENT FOR 5-12 YEAR OLDS: EXISTING SWINGS TO REMAIN. 1 \ ) ~ ~ / t iJ/t -, ..... / /" ~/:. .~~\9 ie' ! IMPROVED 1/2 COURT i / , BASKETBALL Q ...... . "..... .' ~ ..~.~. ., .-\;\. . .:, -......,;.. .~ -... ...... -\........-..... ......'.., ~ ... .. , A -.,.,. . i.....: ~O ^v ~ GATE AT WATER TOWER ACCESS ROAD TO CONTROL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IN PARK. POLICE WILL HAVE ACCESS FOR PARK PATROL. ENTRY GARDEN WITH LANDSCAPE BOULDERS, SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS. EXISTING PARK SIGN TO REMAIN. Small park .';gns will he in:;falled 01 all trail en/rance.Ii to the park. lhe mas/er plan .'iUj.!}.!c.\"I.\' ttpdatin}.: Ihe park \ play eqUIpment. A recently im.talled pluYKfTJllnd at AleadoU' nell' Park i.'! ",howll aho\'e. Farmington, Minnesota Hoi\inw:onKocf:lerGn)UI).lnc. =- f '/--h.; 6:+- B Daisy Knoll Farmington, Minnesota . Preliminary Cost Estimate: based on September 18, 2006 master plan Prepared by Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Description Qty. Unit Unit Totals Price General Improvements secondary park sign 4 Each $ 850 $3,400 park bench 6 Each $ 875 $5,250 waste container 2 Each $ 350 $700 security light 1 Each $ 4,100 $4,100 gate at water tower access road 1 LS $ 2,000 $2,000 subtotal $15,450 Pedestrian Circulation 8' bituminous trails 2,250 LF $ 22 $49,500 5' sidewalk on Euclid Street (including excavation & restoration) 8,510 SF $ 8 $68,080 bollard on trail at street intersections 5 Each $ 500 $2,500 subtotal $120,080 Picnic Area shelter 1 LS $ 31,500 $31,500 picnic tables 3 LS $ 1,300 $3,900 grills 1 EA $ 450 $450 water source/drinking fountain/spigot 1 EA $ 5,250 $5,250 subtotal $41,100 Basketball Court grading 1 LS $ 3,000 $3,000 basketball Concrete pad expansion and striping 220 SF $ 6 $1,320 subtotal $4,320 Playground 2-5 play equipment, safety mulch installed 1 LS $ 15,000 $15,000 5-12 play equipment, safety mulch installed 1 LS $ 35,000 $35,000 ConC. play container edger to separate ages 65 LF $ 16 $1,040 subtotal $51,040 Landscaping gardens at park entry: shrubs, perennials and landscape boulders 4,000 SF $ 4 $16,000 landscaping at water tower fence: shade, evergreen, and 1 LS $ 6,250 $6,250 ornamental trees, large and small shrubs shade trees 7 EA $ 350 $2,450 ornamental trees 8 EA $ 350 $2,800 large shrubs 20 EA $ 60 $1,200 small shrubs 40 EA $ 30 $1,200 prairie garden 1 LS $ 4,000 $4,000 turf seeding allowance 1 LS $ 1,000 $1,000 subtotal $34,900 Natural Areas prairie restoration 10 AC $ 5,200 $52,000 woodland restoration: removal of woody invasive species 8 AC $ 2,000 $16,000 subtotal $68,000 Construction subtotal $334,890 15% construction contingency $50,234 Total I $385,124 G.\Documents and Settings\rdistad\Local Settings\ Temporary Internet Files\OLK7D\060918 Daisy Knoll Cost Estimate9/8/2006 ~ ~ "- o <3 I il > ~ .~ " '" g '" m (D ]ij o f- " " o > o Z 13 o "9 '" en g <( ~ " ~ ii> ::;; s <( m ::;; .0 " u. c ~ g5~ ~~ '" c ~ U. i'" c " .. ~ E :ii .. > > " 2'" .5 "" .. D. ~ eft ~ ;0 ~ ; o '" '" <D .... o <D o '" o o '" '" '" '" '" .. <D ""' ""' <'") <D '" '" '" <D t--- Lt')- ai - '" '" <D .... '" <'") -.i '" '" '" .. '" '" o '" .. '" .. '" ;:: N ~ '" '" GO ~ ;0 (0 M- ~- 8" .... .. .. .. '" '" '" <D .. .. .. o o o <D '" '" '" <'") <'") N ;:: <D <D <D ~ - '" o '" ci '" '" N -.i <D '" '" -.i '" '" '" <D <'") '" '" ~ '" o o o '" :;: '" ~ 1 w ~ ~ <D .. o GO N ~ <D ;! ,.: .... <D ~ N ~ <'") GO ..... Ol <'") .... <'") '" N a;; <'") .... .. I '" ~- '" '" '" o eO <'") <D '" ",- ~ '" eO (I') ~ tI) tA- (fi Y7 i8 .; c.D_ :l 0 III <'") ... o o N .. ~I '" '" 0 "u E'c '" 0 .c'" u~ o(:I~ '" c " 0 '"u (>'" ~,~ cJ) ~ o...a.(j)E (f) o....c ~ m::J--fJl c(f)OW ~ en "" '" ~ ~ o o '" '" <D <'")- .. o o '" '" "'- ;;; o o '" .. o o o o eO .. o '" '" -.i ~ '" '" 0 "u E'c '" 0 .c'" U ~ ""~ '" c " 0 '"u (>'" -c .~ c% * ~8:~~ S::J...... U') Q)(I)OW '> ;: ~ ::;; o o ui <D 0_ U; o o '" '" '" .. o 0 o 0 '" ~ .~ c% ~ ~ 8:~ ~ ~J5o~ ;: ~ :11 <'") <'") '" '" ~ <D '" '" -.i <'") o .... "'- '" o <D <'") '" ~ o <D- <D <D o ro o o '" N tI) EA tI) (fi tIl tI) tf) o o ~ <D .. o 0 o 0 ro <D <'") '" ~ '" < o o '" u; o o ro '" "'- '" .. o '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 "u E'c '" 0 u '-g oO~ '" c " 0 ~ ~ ~ co U) W Q) 0.. Q,l U) ro ~~~~ >-Cf) 0 W ~ ~ o o o o ~ N .. o o 0; o '" N .. o o o '" ;:;: '" o o o <'") - ....- .. o o '" N '" '" '" 0 "u E'c '" 0 Bg <Xlt; '" c " 0 ~ ~ ~ ro lIJ Q.J Q) o...~(/)ro g ~~.~ ~~6~ '" t w o o '" ro (/) Q) Q) o...~(I)ro ~~~~ 0::: (/)0 w ~ :0 ~ '" i:j o o o '" .. '" <D '" o o ui <D '" .. '" '" 0 ",u E'c '" 0 .c'" U ~ ""~ '" c " 0 '"u (>'" ..l<:: (I) W <l.l '-Q)(/)..... ro .- C'IJ 0... ~ w_~ "::'::::J-5(j) %(/)OW U '" '0 '" ~ '" <'") <D .. .. o o ui <'") <D .. '" '" 0 "u E'c '" 0 ..c::';:::; o ~ ""t;; '" c '" 0 .2 U (>'" '" '" '" ..::.::: ,~ (/) ro ~ ~~~ S:(f)OW " :> g; ro 0: o <'") '" ~~;ng~~~ LOMM"d"OLOO .,..:- ..t r--: r--: C"i"": ..- N......I'- vtf;fivt(fl(fltl)~ o o 6 ~ o o <'") 00 00 "'0 0'" "'''' .. .. o o cri .... .. 0000 0000 cri c:i""': <ri ~~~ ~- fh ..,f...- .. .. o o o o ;;; o o .... .... <D .. Vl ~I~.~ Q) 0 .2 Q) ~ c (j) 0 ro ,Q E "0 B g ~ ~ oOtn~i; Vl c '- :::::l Q) 0 Q) .... ~ ~~&~ (l) (I) Q) Q) '- -= u~(f.)ro2.Q ~ ~~ ~ ~ m ~ o::~6~.~~cO ~ 3~g> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 0:: o o o .... "'- ;;; 88 """:0 <'").... <D <'") M-c:;i ..'" .. 88 ~~ Lt')-lli .. '" .. ~ ~ N -.i .. 888 <6 6 ~ r::. ~~ (fl M-"'; .. - .. 888 N c..)r.O :8NrB 1'-- tI) l/:)~ .. '" .. 00 0 00 0 '<t cri ""Ii 2fi~ Ui ~~ ~ o o ui '" '" '" 8 ui <'") or; .. 00 00 "'0 "":16 "'- .... ~ ~ f , . ~ ~ "E I ~ ~ I lOb City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator f) FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Approving Recycling Contract One Year Extension DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION/ACTION REQUESTED The City of Farmington previously entered into a five-year recycling contract with Dick's Sanitation, Inc (DSI) from Lakeville, Minnesota. The contract expires at the end of 2006. The City Council, at its August 7, 2006 meeting, directed staff to negotiate a one year extension of the recycling contract with Dick's Sanitation and bring back the negotiated extension for review and approval by the City Council. Staff members have had the opportunity to negotiate a one year extension of the contract with DSI staff. The action requested is for the City Council to approve the attached 2007 Recycling Contract Extension Agreement (the Agreement) that extends the recycling contract for one additional year. DISCUSSION The Agreement references that the existing recycling contract's performance items will remain in place. The Agreement also adds some items that are not included in the 2002-2006 recycling contract. The additional items are as follows: · Provides for an adjustment of 2.55% on the recycling rates should diesel prices increase to more than $3.50 a gallon, which would allow DSI to recoup the additional diesel costs. · A recycling revenue sharing plan that is based on the actual volume minus the processing and transportation costs incurred by DSI and then the excess revenue would be split 50/50 between DSI and the City. DSI is adamant that any revenue that is shared with the City not go back to Solid Waste operations but instead be directed first to the Youth Scholarship Program to cover its costs and any additional revenue beyond that should go to the Park Improvement Fund. DSI currently has a similar arrangement with the City of Shakopee and would like to maintain the same type of revenue sharing with the City of Farmington. DSI would also like to be recognized in 2007 for the revenue it will be providing to these programs. · The Curbside Clean Up Day Program would be modified slightly so that tires and electronics are dropped off at the Central Maintenance Facility one Saturday during the Clean Up Day Program and on one Saturday after the Curbside Clean Up Day Program. DSI has provided rates for optional labor that DSI could provide to staff the tire and electronic drop offs. · The Curbside Clean Up Day Program would be modified to still allow appliances to be left at the curb for pick up but instead of OSI picking these items up the City would use a third party to pick up the appliances. The cost to dispose of appliances will be reduced through this method of third party curbside pickup. Since this is only a one year extension of the recycling contract, City staff and DSI would like to implement these changes to the Curbside Clean-Up Day Program in order to see if it is something that the City should continue with when a new five year recycling contract is created. The following are some of the benefits that staff members feel will result because of the changes that are being proposed in the Agreement for the Curbside Clean-Up Day Program: · Will reduce the costs associated with the Curbside Clean-Up Day Program because it will hold customers more accountable for what they are able to dispose of at the curb. · It will reduce abuse that has occurred with the number of tires and electronic items that have been left at the curb for pick up. · It still allows curb side pick up of certain household waste such as furniture, gas grills, bikes, lawnmowers, appliances etc. A representative from DSI will be attending the meeting should the City Council have any questions about any of the information contained in the Agreement. BUDGET IMPACT The Agreement creates an opportunity to acquire additional funding for the Youth Scholarship Program and the Park Improvement Fund, which are both beneficial to residents. There will be some time involved with the City providing the staff at the drop off site for tires and electronics. It is estimated that the combined staff costs for the two Saturday mornings during the drop off of tires and electronics will be approximately $3,300. The following is an estimated cost for tire and electronic disposal ifthe City would provide staffing at a drop off site at the Central Maintenance Facility on two Saturdays and assuming that the same amount of tires and pounds of electronics are disposed of in 2007 as were disposed of in 2006. 2006 2007 Number of tires 2,245 2,245 Disposal Cost per Tire 6.50 3.50* Total Cost Savings Total Cost $14,592 $ 7,857 $ 6,735 2006 2007 Pounds of Electronics 114,178 114,178 Disposal Cost per Pound .40 .31 * Total Cost Savings Total Cost $45,671 $35,395 $10,276 * Amount includes cost of truck to haul the tires and electronics to the disposal site, staff time during the hauling and a per tire and per pound electronics disposal cost Based on the cost savings identified, you can clearly see the cost savings for tire and electronic processing should more than cover the cost to staff a drop site for two Saturday mornings. ;;z:,C}f~' Randy~stad Parks and Recreation Director cc: Benno Klotz Lena Larson Todd Reiten 2007 RECYCLING CONTRACT EXTENSION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this _ day of , 2006, by and between Dick's Sanitation, Inc. ("DSI") and the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City") (collectively referred to as the "Parties"). WHEREAS, DSI has for the past five years provided recycling services to the City; and, WHEREAS, the City is interested in extending the current recycling contract with DSI through 2007 and DSI is interested in providing its recycling services to the City through 2007; and, WHEREAS, the Parties are agreeable to the terms that presently exist in the 2002-2006 Agreement for Curbside Recycling and Clean Up Day Services with the exceptions that are identified within this Agreement; and, WHEREAS, based on the favorable recycling service that DSI has provided for the past 5 years to the City, it appears to be in the best interest of the City and its residents to allow DSI to provide recycling services in 2007. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein, the Parties hereby agree as follows: SECTION 1. TERMS OF AGREEMENT. 1. The Agreement shall apply only to the pickup and removal of residential, commercial and industrial recycling material, seasonal yard waste program and the annual Curbside Clean-Up Day Program. 2. This Agreement shall run for a period of 12 months beginning on January 1,2007 and shall end on 12:00 Midnight on December 31,2007. 3. The terms of this Agreement do not bind the Parties to any future agreements. 4. A meeting shall occur with both Parties at the conclusion of the Curbside Clean Up Day Program to evaluate its success. 5. DSI agrees to keep the recycling rates the same as the 2006 rates with the exception that DSI may make a diesel fuel adjustment based on any diesel fuel costs that exceed $3.00 per gallon. Currently DSI pays a bulk rate of$2.90/gallon. The diesel fuel adjustment will be calculated as a percentage of anything over $3.00/gallon and would be based on the following formula: for every 50 cent a gallon increase in diesel fuel cost, there would be a corresponding 2.55% increase in the overall recycling rate charge to each customer i.e. if the diesel fuel went to $3.50/gallon, then the base rate would be multiplied by 2.55% to cover the increased cost of diesel fuel. SECTION 2. DSIOBLIGATIONS. 1. DSI will provide a recycling revenue sharing reimbursement program based on the actual volume less processing and transportation costs divided by 50%. DSI will only share revenue if the City agrees to not use the revenue to cover operational costs but instead uses it in the following manner: a. First priority: cover the costs of the City's 2007 Youth Scholarship Program. b. Second priority: should the entire costs of the 2007 Youth Scholarship Program be covered, the remaining revenue shall be deposited in the City's Park Improvement Fund for future improvements to City parks. DSI will be recognized in City publications for providing revenue in 2007 to cover expenses related to the Youth Scholarship Program and for its contributions to the Park Improvement Fund should any be made after the Youth Scholarship Program costs are covered. 2. DSI is proposing the following services and rates for the Curbside Clean Up Day Program: a) Dates for the Curbside Clean Up Day Program would be on the following five Saturdays prior to Memorial Day: April 21, 28 and May 5,12, and 19. b) Rates for the curbside collection of acceptable MSW and acceptable bulk items over the five Saturdays would be $ 125.00/Hour/Truck + $54.00/ton + tax. c) Curbside collection of Steel (Dirty) all types including gas grills, bikes, lawnmowers, riders and other. Rates would be $125.00/Hour/Truck + Reimbursement value of $5 - $20/ton depending on current market value. d) Optional labor could be provided by DSI for the two (2) Saturdays of electronics and tires being dropped off at the City's Central Maintenance Facility at a rate of $75.00/Hour/Truck + Direct rates for electronics and tires. Direct rates would be determined by agreements with the markets that the City of Farmington negotiates. e) Appliances curbside pick-up would be a direct agreement between the City and a different private hauler. Dick's Sanitation would not be involved in the hauling and disposal of appliances. f) Apartment roll-offs would be charged out at $175.00/pull + $54.00/ton + tax. 3. Seasonal yard waste rate to increase to $72.00 per year with no incidental service offered. DSI agrees to provide notification to the City when a resident signs up for the seasonal yard waste program so that the fee can be placed on the customer's quarterly utility billing statement for payment. Dick's will invoice the City for the seasonal yard waste program on a quarterly basis. 4. DSI will provide to the City proof of proper insurance coverage as identified in the previous 5 year Recycling Contract. 5. DSI will provide a Performance Bond in the amount of $20,000 to the City. SECTION 3. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS. 1. Provide the Central Maintenance Facility as a drop off site for tires and electronics. 2. Provide the labor at the drop off site for receiving tires and electronics. 3. Haul and properly dispose of all tires and electronics received during the drop off dates. 4. After Curbside Clean Up Day Program has been completed, make payment to DSI for services rendered. 5. Provide quarterly billing to residents who participate in the seasonal yard waste program through the City's utility billing program. Payment to DSI for the seasonal yard waste program will occur quarterly. 6. Deliver/provide recycling containers to City residents. SECTION 4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. In the event that DSI fails to perform and carry out any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement strictly in accordance with the provisions hereof, or for any reason is unable to properly conduct its business, the City of Farmington will notify DSI (in a written letter) of the service issue for which DSI will have ten (10) days to correct the said service issue. In the event that DSI does not respond or communicate any such ratification to the City of Farmington's letter, then the City of Farmington may terminate the Agreement by giving written notice of 30 days to DSI (in writing). SECTION 5. OTHER TERMINATION. NOTWITHSTANDING any other provision, if any local law, rule, regulation, or order prohibits the activities in this Agreement, then this Agreement shall be immediately terminated with both Parties owing no further compensation to each other. SECTION 6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The current, underlying Agreement 2002-2006 continues in effect except as provided in the 2007 extension agreement, and that the two documents together comprise the "entire agreement" of the Parties. I DICK'S SANITATION, INC. CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation BY: BY: President Kevan A. Soderberg, Mayor AND Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2006, by the President Dick's Sanitation, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on its behalf. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( 55. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2006, by Kevan A. Soderberg and by Peter Herlofsky, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public AGREEMENT for CURBSIDE RECYCLING and CLEANUP DAY SERVICES between CITY OF FARMINGTON AND DICK'S SANITATION SERVICE, INe. This Agreement made and entered this 6.J day of \':)e<:'-(~C(2001, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON ("City"), a Minnesota municipal corporation, and DICK'S SANITATION SERVICE, INe. ("Contractor"), a Minnesota corporation, is for recycling, temporary container and bulk collection and transportation of certain mixed municipal solid waste and recyclable materials. In consideration of their mutual covenants, the City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Term of Agreement, Contractor"s Responsibilities, and Payment. 1.1 Term of Agreement: The term of this agreement shall be for five (5) years beginning January 1, 2002 and renewing annually on December 31 of each year until December 31, 2006. The City may choose at its discretion not to annually renew this agreement by providing written notice to the contractor 30 days before December 315t of any term year of this agreement of its intent to terminate this agreement at the end of the term year and thereupon shall have no continuing obligation to the contractor. 1.2 Contractor's Responsibilities: The Contractor shall provide Curbside Recycling Services for residential and commercial customers within the City of Fannington, including special services specified herein for Curbside Clean Up Days/ Temporary Containers/Bulk PickupsNard Waste Pickup. The Contractor agrees to provide the collection and transportation services for these materials in accordance with the City's Request for Proposals (RFP). The Contractor's proposal is attached and is hereby referenced as Exhibit A. Ownership of the materials shall remain with the person placing it out for collection until Contractor's personnel collects the materials, at which time Contractor shall have proprietary rights to the recyclables. 1.3 Payment: The City shall compensate the Contractor for the collection of recyclable materials on a monthly basis as follows: a) Single Family Dwellings ,""C\'\~ 2002........ ....... .... ............... .................. ... $2. 77 /qu~er/unit 2003 ....................................................... $2.77 /qu er/unit 2004. ....... ............. ....................... ........... $2.87/qua er/unit 2005....... .............. ............................ ....... $3.05/qua er/unit \ 1 rv c. qfO ~ 0' f\ V \ \q\o IV' 97247 2006.............................. ......................... $3.a5/quarter/unit b) Multi Family Dwellings v'\/lv",~..:*,,^, 1..,- 2002....................................................... $ 1. 65/qua er/unit V /D 2003....................................................... $1.65/qu er/unit <v 0 -- '\ \ 2004........................ ............................... $1. 73/qu er/unit 2005....................................................... $1. 73/qu er/unit 2006...... ................................................. $1. 80/qua er/unit c) City Buildings 2002. ...................................................... $80.00/month 2003.................. ............ ..................... .... $80.00/month 2004.................................... ................... $90.00/month 2005....................................................... $90.00/month 2006. .............. ........................................ $100. OO/month d) Commercial Customers Commercial Service 2002/2003 2004/2005 2006 Papers 151 additional 1st container additional 151 container additional container containers containers containers 90 gallons $7.00 $3.65 $7.25 $3.85 $7.45 $3.95 2 cy $7.50 $4.25 $7.75 $4.45 $7.95 $4.65 4 cy $8.00 $4.85 $8.25 $5.05 $8.45 $5.25 6 cy $9.00 $6.65 $9.25 $6.85 $9.45 $7.05 8 cy $10.00 $6.95 $10.25 $7.15 $10.45 $7.35 residential 2.77 $.75 $2.87 $.85 $3.05 $.85 Commercial Service 2002/2003 2004/2005 2006 Cans/Glass/Plastic 151 additional 151 container additional 151 container additional container containers containers containers 90 gallons $7.00 $3.65 $7.25 $3.85 $7.45 $3.95 New customers added to the service will be prorated on the basis of 4.3 weeks in a month. Payment will be made monthly within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor's statement provided all monthly reporting requirements are current. The Contractor shall bill "bulk collections" directly to the customer at the following rates: 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Less than 3 yards $15.00/cy $15.00/cy $17.00/cy $ 17.00/cy $18.00/cy served by rear loader 3-6 cubic yards $25.00/cy $25.00/cy $28.00/cy $28.00/cy $30.00/cy containers A price list of typical extra charges for appliances, furniture, tires, etc. shall be provided to the City and updated copies shall be provided if revisions are made. 97247 2 Seasonal yard waste services shall be billed directly to the cust0mer at the following rates: 2002 .......................................................... $59.00/season 2003 .......................................................... $59. DO/season 2004 .......................................................... $62.00/season 2005 .......................................................... $62. DO/season 2006 .......................................................... $68.00/season Time of Payment: Payment will be made by the 30th day of each month for service provided during the previous month. Payments shall be based on the number of accounts served by the City's solid waste service on the last day of the month. 2. Definitions: 2.1 "Recyclables" means newsprint, including all newspaper materials and inserts, glass, aluminum, steel and "tin" cans, oil, batteries, uncoated corrugated cardboard, plastics, catalogs and magazines, and glossies, telephone books, boxboard and all other materials mutually agreed to by the City and Contractor. 2.2 "Collected" means picking up all recyclable materials at all residential and commercial locations in the City of Farmington, including residential and commercial locations which are constructed or annexed to the City during the term of this agreement, and the transporting of the recyclable materials to a site where they can be processed for the marketplace as determined by the Contractor which is acceptable to City. 3. Residential Recycling. 3.1 Frequency: Recyclables shall be collected once each week and routes shall conform to the City's solid waste collection schedule, including hours of operation, days and holidays. The City's routes and solid waste collection schedule shall be furnished to Contractor. (See attached route map). 3.2 Sort system: Recyclables shall be collected using a three sort system consisting of the following materials: Sort 1 - commingled and placed in paper bags or reusable containers . Newsprint - all newspaper materials, including inserts. . Mixed Paper . Magazines, catalogs, glossies, junk mail, phone books. . Boxboard Sort 2 - commingled and placed in paper bags or reusable containers . Aluminum - all food and beverage containers. . Bi-metal - all food and beverage containers. . Glass - all food and beverage containers. . Plastics with a neck Sort 3 - Cut into bundles and tied or taped securely . Cardboard - all uncoated corrugated cardboard. 97247 3 3.3 Collection Hours: Collection shall commence no earlj,er than 7:00 am and be completed by 5:00 pm. Customers are requested to have materials at the curb or in the alley by 7:00 am. 3.4 Collection point: Recyclables shall be collected at the curb or in the alley. The operator shall return the recycling bin to approximately the same location it was set out (at least five feet away from the garbage container or any other structure) and also turn the bin upside down. If materials are left at the collection point the bin will remain upright. 3.5 Procedure for unacceptable materials: If the Contractor determines that a resident has set out unacceptable recyclable materials, the operator shall use the following procedure: a) The Contractor shall collect all the recyclable materials and leave an education tag provided by the Contractor and approved by the City in the recycling container indicating unacceptable materials and/or the proper method of preparation. b) The driver shall record the address on forms provided by the Contractor. The Contractor shall report the addresses by the end of each week to the City Recycling Coordinator in a format mutually agreed upon by the Contractor and City. c) Upon request, the City Recycling Coordinator will undertake efforts to educate the resident or owner regarding proper materials preparation. 3.6 Cleanup responsibility: Contractor shall adequately clean up any material spilled or blown during the course of collection and/or hauling operations. Any unacceptable materials left behind should be secured within resident's recycling container, if provided. Driver shall take all precautions possible to prevent littering of unacceptable recyclables, and shall be responsible for litter created by collection. All collection vehicles shall be equipped with at least one broom and one shovel for use in cleaning up material spillage. Contractor shall have no responsibility to remove or clean up any items which are not recyclable materials. 3.7 Missed collections: Contractor shall have a duty to pick up any missed collections. Contractor agrees to pick up all missed collections on the same day Contractor receives notice of a missed collection, provided notice is received by Contractor before noon on a business day. With respect to all notices of a missed collection received after 12:00 p.m. on a business day, Contractor agrees to pick up that missed collection before 12:00 p.m. on the immediately following business day. 3.8 Contractor communication requirements: Contractor shall provide staffing of a telephone equipped office to receive missed collection complaints between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on weekdays, except holidays. The Contractor shall have an answering machine or voice mail system activated to receive phone calls after hours. Contractor shall keep a log of all calls including the subject matter, the date and the time received, the Contractor's response and the date and time of response. The Contractor shall provide the City with a report with all the listed information at the end of each month. 3.9 Non-completion of collection and extension of collection hours: If the Contractor determines that the collection ofrecyclables will not be completed by 5:00 pm on the scheduled collection day, it shall notify the City Recycling Coordinator by 4:00 pm and request an extension of the collection hours. The Contractor shall inform the City of the areas not completed, the reason for non- completion, and the expected time of completion. If the Recycling Coordinator can not be reached, the Contractor shall follow the agreed upon method of communication to inform the City of the delay in collection. 97247 4 3.10 Holidays: Contractor will follow the City's adopted holiday schedule (attached). 3.11 Public Education and Promotion: The Contractor will participate in educating City customers on recycling, including yard waste recycling, and will seek to promote recycling in a manner mutually agree upon by the City and the Contractor. This education will include customer notifications of any operational changes and participation in community presentations. 3.12 Facilities to be Collected From: a) All single family and multi family dwellings with single family service served by the City's solid waste service. b) All multi-family dwellings served by the City's solid waste service (see attached list). c) All City owned and operated buildings. Fire Hall............................................. 21625 Denmark Ave. City Hall............................................ 325 Oak Street Arena................................... .............. 114 Spruce St. Senior Center..................................... 431- 3 rd St. Pool.. .................................................. 626 Heritage Way Liquor Store........ ............................... 305 - 3rd St. Liquor Store....................................... 18515 Pilot Knob Rd. Central Maintenance Facility............ 19650 Municipal Dr. Law Enforcement Center................... 19500 Municipal Dr. 3.13 Method of Payment: The City shall pay the contract by the 30th day of each month for service provided during the previous month. Payments shall be based on the number of accounts served by the City's solid waste service on the last day ofthe month. 4. Commercial Recycling Services. 4.1 Scope of Services: The Contractor will provide recycling services to the City of Farmington's commercial customers as outlined in Part 3 above for Residential customers except as modified in this section below. 4.2 Recyclables Collected: The following materials shall be collected at the site of the commercial businesses as arranged and currently consist of the following materials: a) Newsprint - all newspaper materials, including inserts. Office Paper b) c) d) e) Cardboard - all uncoated corrugated cardboard. Aluminum - all food and beverage containers, including foil. Bi-metal - all food and beverage containers. 97247 5 f) Glass - all food and beverage containers. g) Plastics - with a neck. h) Magazines, catalogs, glossies, junk mail, phone books. i) Boxboard. 4.3 Routes: Routes shall correspond with the City's solid waste collection schedule, including hours of operation, days and holidays. 5. Vehicle and Operator Requirements. 5.1 Vehicle Requirements: a) The Contractor must obtain all pertinent licenses from the Federal, State and County and City governments. An annual report/update on licensing shall be submitted. The Contractor shall provide proof of current licensing and current MnDOT vehicle inspection reports upon request by the City, and on an annual basis. b) All vehicles must be maintained in proper working condition and available for inspection by the City or County. The Contractor shall supply the City with copies of annual inspections on all vehicles per MnDot requirements. c) Vehicles should be equipped with a two-way radio or phone, warning flashers and signs, backup alarms, a first aid kit and a broom and shovel for spills, and the contractor's name and phone number prominently displayed on both sides of the vehicle. d) Recycling vehicles must be designated for recyclables collection only. All such vehicles must be clearly signed on both sides as recycling collection vehicles. e) Vehicles must be kept in good operating condition, comply with all State inspection requirements, and be kept neat in appearance. Generally this shall mean washed and painted regularly. f) In the event that a vehicle other than the type specified in the proposal is to be used, the contractor is required to notify the City as soon as possible prior to collection. 5.2 Operator Personnel Requirements: The Contractor shall retain sufficient personnel and equipment to fulfill the requirements and specifications of this agreement. The Contractor will provide a Route Supervisor to oversee the recycling route drivers servicing the City. The Route Supervisor will be available to address customer complaints by cell phone or voice mail. The Contractor's personnel shall: a) . Conduct themselves at all times in a courteous manner with the general public. b) Make a concerted effort to have at all times a presentable appearance and attitude. c) Perform their work in a neat and a quiet manner and clean up all recyclable materials spilled in collection and hauling operations. 97247 6 d) Handle containers by picking them up, emptying their contents into the collection vehicle. and place, not throw or slide, the container back in its original location and/or at least five feet from the garbage container, turned upside down. e) Avoid damage to containers and other property. f) Not perform their duties or operate vehicles while consuming alcohol or illegally using controlled substances or while under the influence of alcohol and/or such substances. g) Abide by all applicable local, state and federal laws while performing the work. 6. Reporting Requirements. 6.1 Weight Requirements: The Contractor must provide certified weight receipts for all collected materials within 15 days of the end of the month for that month. If recyclables are not weighed individually, the Contractor must indicate the procedure that will be used to determine the individual material breakdown. 6.2 Delivery Requirements: The Contractor must report, by individual material and amounts, where materials are delivered for recycling. If that entity is a broker only, then the Contractor must report what end market the broker used. Summaries by brokers and end markets must be provided within 15 days of the end of the previous month. If collected materials are stored for a period of more than 30 days, the amounts of materials, by type and location, must be reported to the City. 7. Penalty Clause. The City shall impose a $100.00 per day penalty for violations in the terms of the agreement. The City shall inform the Contractor of the violation and allow the Contractor one working day to correct the violation. If the violation is not resolved to the satisfaction of the City, the penalty shall be subtracted from the City's monthly payment. 8. Special Services. 8.1 Temporary Containers: Contractor shall provide Farmington residents temporary containers for mixed municipal solid waste. The Contractor shall provide this service to residents by utilizing 3 to 6 cubic yard temporary containers for the mixed municipal solid waste collections. City customers utilizing temporary containers will be allowed to deposit mixed municipal solid waste in accordance with State and local regulations. Upon receipt of these requests, the Contractor shall be required to provide an appropriate drop-off container at the location requesting the service within one working day. This service will be available to all customers served by the City's solid waste service. Customers may utilize temporary containers for up to two weeks. The Contractor will be required to submit a monthly report to the City detailing locations, quantities and disposal sites that have been served by this agreement. 8.2 Bulk Item Curbside Pickup: Contractor shall provide for the collection of bulk mixed solid waste picked up curbside (typically three cubic yards or less). The Contractor shall make these collections by using rear load packers or a boom type truck for bulk items. 97247 7 8.3 Curbside Yard Waste Collections: Contractor shall provide for curbside yardwaste collection using a contractor provided 90 gallon polyethylene container, with a lid and 8"-10" wheels. The seasonal rate includes the 90 gallon container and up to 10 compostable paper bags or reusable containers per week. The season shall typically run from April 15 through November 15, depending on weather conditions. All yard waste collections shall be made in accordance with Federal, State and local regulations. These collections shall be made on the same day as the City's mixed solid waste and recycling collection schedule. This service will only be provided to customers receiving the City's mixed solid waste collection services. 8.4 Billing: Any special pickups and seasonal yard waste customers will be billed directly by the contractor to the customer. Recycling services will be billed to the City. A process may be negotiated between the City and the Contractor for delinquent customers. 9. Curbside Clean Up Days 9.1 Scope of Services: Contractor shall provide for the collection of Refuse, Tires, Electronics and Appliances from all single and multi family residential units in the City on city-specified Clean Up Days. 9.2 Schedule: Clean Up Day will be held annually according to residential garbage/recycling routes on five consecutive Saturdays, starting in mid April. 9.3 Refuse: For purposes of this section, refuse means waste which normally results from the operation of a household including rubbish. Refuse includes carpeting (bundled and tied into rolls no larger than 5 feet long and 3 feet wide), household furnishings and furniture, and scrap wood. Refuse is limited to no more than what can fit inside a level standard size pick up truck bed for dwellings with single family solid waste service. Multi-family dwellings are typically limited to one 20 yard roll-off per building. Refuse materials may not exceed 100 pounds per item. Refuse does not include body waste, food waste, leaves, grass or brush. Refuse also does not include construction or remodeling debris, stumps, recyclables, filters, fluorescent lamps, household hazardous waste, and/or any other item prohibited by County, State, and Federal statute from solid waste management facilities. 9.4 Tires: Tires will be limited to four per dwelling unit. Tires will be collected, handled and processed in accordance with tire processor requirements set forth by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. 9.5 Electronics: Televisions, computer monitors, computers, keyboards, printers, typewriters, fax machines, copiers, printers. Electronics will be collected and managed in a fashion that is consistent with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency electronics recycling guidelines and with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Electronics will be limited to collection of a maximum of two per dwelling unit. (A computer, monitor & keyboard will be considered one unit.) 9.6 Appliances: Air conditioners, automatic garage door mechanisms, dehumidifiers, dishwashers, clothes washers and dryers, freezers, furnaces, garbage disposals, heat pumps, humidifiers, microwave ovens, refrigerators, conventional stoves and ranges, trash compactors, hot water heaters, water coolers. Appliances will be collected, handled and processed in accordance with major appliance processor requirements set forth by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Appliances will be limited to collection of a maximum of two per dwelling unit. Appliances from rental apartment complexes are not included in this program. 97247 8 9.7 Scrap Metal: Scrap metal including but not lin:ited to: bicycles, lawn mowers, lead acid batteries and wheel rims. Scrap metal materials will be col1ected, handled and processed in accordance with al1 applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. 9.8 Weighing of Materials and Reporting Requirements: Contractor wil1 keep accurate records consisting of an approved weight slip with the date, time, col1ection route, driver's name, vehicle number, tare weight, gross weight and net weight for each loaded vehicle used for collection of materials. Collection vehicles will be weighed empty before collection to obtain a tare weight and weighed after completion of collection. An original of each weight ticket shall be included as part of the billing sent to the City within one month after completion of the service. Contractor will provide a final report of the total tons of refuse collected, the tons of tires collected, the number and weight of appliances and electronics picked up and the total tons of scrap metal recycled. 10. Miscellaneous. 10.1 Incentives: Failure to complete collection by 7:00 p.m. on the day of collection will result in a 50% reduction in the price paid for each unit not collected. The cost per unit will be based on the average household unit cost in the contract. The Public Works Administrative Assistant will be responsible for verifying the number of households not collected. There will be no compensation for household units served after 5:00 p.m. on the Monday following collection. Collection must continue as expeditiously as possible until completed. 10.2 Weather: Only emergency weather warnings can stop collection. Monetary penalties will be waived for one day in the case of stoppage due to emergency weather conditions. 10.3 Disposal of Recyclables, Refuse and other materials: The proposer shall dispose of the material as per County, State and Federal law. The City will not directly pay for the transfer of waste to a disposal site. The cost to dispose of waste is defined as the cost charged by a solid waste management facility. The proposer must use an approved Solid Waste Management Facility that can indemnify the City from State and Federal liability. 10.4 Disposal Site: A refuse depository including but not limited to sanitary landfills, transfer stations, incinerators, and waste processing/separation centers licensed, permitted or approved by all governmental bodies and agencies having jurisdiction and requiring such licenses, permits or approvals to receive refuse for processing or final disposal. 10.5 Insurance Coverage: The Contractor shall maintain insurance in the amounts shown below during the entire term of the project. The City shall be named as an additional insured in said comprehensive general liability policy and certificates of said insurance shall be provided to the City before any work on this project may commence. The Contractor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all insurance has been obtained and copies have been filed and accepted by the City. The City shall be named as an additional insured in all of the Contractor's insurance policies for coverage specified in this Agreement. All policies shall provide that the coverage may not be terminated or changed by the insurer except upon 30 days written notice to the City Administrator. None of the insurance policies shall contain any provisions for exclusions from liability other than those provisions for exclusion from liability which form part of the standard basic unamended and unendorsed form of a policy, except that no exclusion shall be permitted if it conflicts with a coverage expressly required in this Agreement, and in addition, no policy shall contain any exclusion from bodily injury to, or sickness, disease, or death of any coverage under the contractual liability endorsement of the liability of the Contractor under this Agreement. 97247 9 Comprehensive General Liability . $1,000,000 per claim/occurrence . $200,000 property damage A utomotive Liability . $250,000 individual, $500,000 occurrence . $100,00 property damage Workers Compensation . Workers Compensation Insurance as required by Minnesota Statute, Section 176.181, Subd. 2 The Contractor must notify the City in writing twenty-five (25) days prior to cancellation or change in terms to the above insurance coverage. All insurance must be provided at the Contractor's expense and no additional cost to the City. Compliance by the Contractor with the foregoing requirements to carry insurance and furnish certificates shall not relieve the Contractor from liability assumed under any provisions of this Agreement. 10.6 Compensation for Services: The City will pay in accordance with the lump sum or unit price schedule included in the proposal. Such payments are to be considered full and complete compensation. The Contractor shall provide an invoice detailing per hour truck and labor time and per ton disposal costs. Payment will not be made for materials or services not stated in the contract. Any changes of deviations to the contract must be verified in writing to be valid. 10.7 Method of Payment: Contractor shall submit an itemized bill for services provided to the City within 30 days after collection has been completed. The City normally pays within thirty (30) days after receipt of an invoice for completed service. Payment to the Contractor will not be released unless the required reports (see Part IV, #7 of the RFP) are included in the bill. 10.8 Term: The contract time shall commence on the date a signed contract has been received by the Contractor and all insurance and bond requirements have been approved by the City. The contract expiration date shall be that date stated in the contract or upon completion of all of the terms stated in the contract. 10.9 Independent Contractor: It is agreed that nothing herein contained is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partners between the parties hereto or as constituting the Contractor as the agent, representative or employee of the City for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. The Contractor is to be and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services performed under this contract. Any and all personnel of the Contractor or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims whatsoever on behalf of any such person or personnel arising out of employment or alleged employment including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against the Contractor, its officers, agents, contractors or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the City; and the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all such claims regardless of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission or court. Such personnel or other persons shall not require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the City, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, disability, severance pay and PERA. 10.10 Subcontractor: The Contractor may enter into subcontracts with haulers permitted in the City of Farmington for services provided for under the executed contact for the services specified herein. 97247 10 The forming of a coalition of City permitted haulers is also acceptable. A lead coordinating hauler must be specified if this approach is utilized. 10.11 Assignment: Neither party shall assign the executed contract, nor any interest arising therein, without the written consent of the other party. 10.12 Services Not Provided For: No claim for services furnished by the Contractor not specifically provided for herein shall be honored by the City. This includes but is not limited to the cost to transfer materials collected to a disposal site. 10.13 Severability: The provisions of the executed Contract are severable. If any portion hereof and in the executed Contract is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction, to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of the same contract. 10.14 Compliance with Laws and Regulations: In providing services hereunder and in the executed Contract, the contractor shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the provision of services to be provided hereunder. Any violation shall constitute a material breach of the executed Contract. 10.15 Nondiscrimination Clause: Contractor shall comply with all laws and regulations relating to discrimination. 10.16 Waiver: Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of the executed Contract shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of the executed Contract. 10.17 Indemnification: The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officials, agents, and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including attorney's fees arising out of or resulting from the successful proposers, including the contractor's officials, agents, employees and subcontractor's performance of the duties required under the contract, provided the such claim, damage, loss or expense is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease, death, or to the injury to or the destruction of property, including a loss of use resulting therefrom, and is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission or misconduct of the proposer. The contractor shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of all employees on the site and shall provide reasonable protection to prevent damage or loss to the property on the site or properties adjacent thereto and to work, materials and equipment under the contractor's control. 10.18 Conflict of Interest: Contractor agrees that no member, officer, or employee of the City shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the executed Contract or the proceeds thereof. Violation of this provision shall cause the executed Contract to be null and void and the Contractor will forfeit any payments to be made under the executed Contract. 10.19 Utilities: The contractor shall be obligated to protect all public and private utilities whether occupying street or public or private property. If such utilities are damaged by reason of the Contractor's operations, under the executed Contract, he/she shall repair or replace same or, failing to do so promptly, the City shall cause repairs or replacements to be made and the cost of doing so shall be deducted from payment to be made to the Contractor. 10.20 Entire Contract: The executed Contract supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements previously in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of the executed Contract shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 10.21 Compliance with Laws: 97247 11 a) The Contractor shall comply with all laws and regulations relating to discrimination and comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment of employment in its services, programs, or activities. b) The Contractor agrees that it must pay any subcontractor within ten days of the prime contractor's receipt of payment from the municipality for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor agrees that it must pay interest of 1-112 percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid balance of less than $100, the prime contractor shall pay the actual penalty to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from a prime contractor must be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. c) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the successful Contractor relevant to the contract shall, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16B.06, subdA, be subject to examination at all times by the City and/or by the Legislative Auditor or State Auditor. d) If the Contractor refuses or fails to furnish goods or services in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement, the City may purchase such goods or services from other sources until such time as the Contractor is able to perform under the terms of the Contract. e) The Contractor agrees that Agreement shall be construed and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. t) The Contractor agrees to at all times observe and comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of the federal, state and local government which may in any manner affect the preparation of the proposals or the performance of the Contract. g) All proposals must include all applicable taxes and fees in the proposal prices submitted. 11. Access to All Records. 11.1 The Contractor shall provide access to the City, Dakota County, or any of their duly authorized representatives to review any books, documents, papers, and records of this Agreement which are directly pertinent to this Agreement and necessary for purposes of an audit. 12. Letter of Credit 12.1 To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish City with an automatically renewing, irrevocable letter of credit, acceptable to the City Administrator, from a bank (security) for an amount equal to one year's worth of the estimated contract costs. The City may draw down the security, without prior notice, for any violation of this Agreement. 97247 12 13. Indemnification 13.1 The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents, and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses, or expenses, including attorney fees, for which it may be held liable, arising out of in whole or in part from the Contractor's work on behalf of the City. 14. Termination 14.1 The City shall have the right to terminate this agreement at any time on 30 days written notice to the Contractor. 14.2 The City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement in the event of any breach thereof by the Contractor. The City's right to terminate shall not be deemed to be waived due to a continuing breach by the Contractor which is not followed by prompt termination. This Agreement shall terminate, and neither party nor the officers of the City shall be liable for further performance after such termination, if it shall become invalid by reason of any present or future law other than by ordinance of the City. 14.3 Upon failure of the Contractor to fulfill any of the provisions of this Agreement, the City Administrator may hire such persons, or assign City employees and equipment, as may be necessary, to do such work and the cost and expense thereof may be charged and deducted from monies due the Contractor, collected from the Contractor, or collected from the Contractor's letter of credit. 15. Penalties 15.1 Failure by the Contractor to conform with any provision of this Agreement may result in the termination of this Agreement and/or cash claims by the City for damages. The City shall inform the Contractor of such failure in writing and the Contractor shall have 30 days from the date of notice to correct such failure before any penalty may be invoked. 15.2 In the event of such failure, the Contractor agrees to pay, in addition to the actual damages sustained by the City as a result thereof, the reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City in pursuing any of its rights under Agreement and an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the actual damages. 15.3 Failure by the Contractor to pick up recyclable materials within 24 hours which were set out to be picked up on the correct date and time shall result in a charge of $50.00 for each such missed pickup. Such charges may be deducted from the monthly fees owed the Contractor for services. 16. Successors and Assigns 16.1 The Contractor binds itself jointly and severally, its successors, executors, administrators, and assigns to the City in respect to all covenants of this Agreement, except that the Contractor shall not assign or transfer any part of its interest in this Agreement or sublet as a whole nor shall the Contractor assign any monies due, or to become due, without the City's written consent. 97247 13 17. Entire Agreement 17.1 This Agreement embodies the entire Agreement between the parties including all prior understandings and agreement may not be modified except in writing and signed by all the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF FARMINGTON By:~LJ-C7~ Gerald l7. Ristow Its Mayor BY~ r--- Ed Shu~ Its City Administrator DICK'S SANITATION SERVICE, INC. By: IJ.;J ~. Richard Clemmer ~ Its President 97247 14 STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .3 ~ day of D~~:; 2001 by Gerald G. Ristow, Mayor and by Ed Shukle, City Administrator ofthe City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by the City Council. . . I 'I";:"~'< CYNTHIA A. MULLER I ~~j~ NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA ",,"' My Ccmm. Expires Jan. 31, 2005 .~.v.,~~.v^,.....~. ~,o h?~ STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c;1./p -Il. day of 71~ 2001 by Richard Clemmer, President of Dick's Sanitation Service, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. ~13-~ Notary Public ~~~~~4'H-<i'~'>t-..,. ~~ ~,. SANDr-L~, B. SIMON I"OT A P,l' f' ,JC<UC . MINNESOTA My COI1'11T, ExplCes Jan, 31,2005 .~"l'~ 97247 15 t:::!. J~ -'~ ~ DSI 1~. , "l~e S, r ~ ~ LSI,3 "7~ -1~ e~" Commercial Services "7~ -1~ e~" Residential Services September 20th, 2001 Honorable City Council City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Dear Staff, Mayor and Members of the City Council, Dick's I Lakeville Sanitation appreciates serving your community over the past six years. We have enjoyed solving the challenges of your growing successful City. Over the past several years, we have made the commitment to provide your community with quality service in several ways, these include: Active participation in the community: Member of Dakota County Solid Waste Advisory Committee, Participant in the Pollution Prevention Day and actively donate both time and money to the local community. Experience: Excellent Driver and Staff promptly available to service your community. Over six years of experience servicing the City of Farmington and over thirty six years of solid waste and recycling experience. Education: Providing detailed educational materials and information. The Creative TEAM: Developing solutions to assist in your solid waste and recycling needs; including: 1) Developing a successful cleanup program 2) Reworking recycling to a two sort system to more convenience the residents 3) Developing a creative seasonal compost program to better serve the City 4) Recommend recycling incentive programs (as markets show positive results) 5) Work closely with City Staff to assist with special solid waste issues We our confident that DSI/LSI has built a strong foundation to maintain the quality service the City of Farmington has come to expect. We hope to continue our great relationship and would appreciate your endorsement. ' . SincerelY'1 DIVb14C'6~ Brett Anderson General Manager ~~~~~ David Domack Sales Manager Commercial Division: (952) 469-2239 P.O. BOX 769 · LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 · FAX: (952) 469-1146 Residential Division: (952) 469-5161 ,~ :0. 'J " "" ':2 ~\c~ S1S.~ u tk DIFFERENCE ~ ~@) \.1 ~l ..;. \.' \.1.1. .I. n I- ..l. _ . .J ,=' .r .-..._:a. v oj ~ -:1:."" '-' - "" ... - FA."X ADDENDu""YI NO.1 SPECIFICATIONS FOR CL""RBSIDE RECYCLL~G SERviCES FOR ML'KJCIPAL RESIDE~TIAL AND COMJ\1ERCL-\L CCSTO:\lERS F ARlVIINGTON, lVII:NN""ESOT A September 17, 2001 Opening Time: Opening Date: 2:00 P.M. Thursday, September 20, 200J ADDENDUl\-l NO.1 Proposer shall acknowledge receipt of this addendum by making and initialing the necessary changes <)n the proposal fonn. On page 12 of the RFP under Part TV. AJ1crnate Proposal for Curbside Clemup Days .t..ND on page 9 of the proposal fonn: in the last line of the Curbside Clean Up Day chart next to scrap metal collection & processing~ it sho1.:lld read LL1vfP S1;.ZM rather than PER.: TO?\'. ClTRBSIDE CLEA~ UP DAYS I 2002 i 2003 2004 2005 i 2006 , I ! I item lestimated \ 4973 I 5273 5613 5913 I 6253 I hl1 units I trash collection lump sum 1$ 19,465.65 1$ 20,82835 $22.1"71.35 $ 23.356.35 i$ 25,01200 i trash dIsposal I per LOll is 5"7.00 1$ 5"7.00 's; 5-;-00 T$ 5-00 i.'l: 5800 ! ,. tire co llection &: processing !per tire 1$ 6.00 1$ 600 $ 6.25 <r 625 is; 6..50 i ,0 electronics collection 8: processing I per pound 1$ .34 1$ 35 $ .35 1$ .36 is; 38 i I appliance collection & proces:;ing Iper appliance 1$ 3000 is; 30.00 $ 3200 $ 3200 !$ 34.00 I scrap metal collection & processing I.Lump Sum 1$ Included 1$ lncluded 1$ Included 1$ Included 1$ 1ncluckcl , I The proposer must sign below, acknowledgh"1.g that he has received Addendum No.1 and has ref1ected any changes in bis bid proposal. Failure to sign Addendum No. 1 and to include Addendum No. 1 W~L\ the proposal allows the OViner to deem the contractor "Non Responsible" and the conr:-actors bid may be !cj ected. In submitting this bid, it is understood that L.1e owner retains the right to reject any and all bids and to waive irregularities and informalities therein, and to award the contract to the best llutrests of the owner. (A Corporation) (An Individual) (A Parrncrship) p; 0( 's LL4k8 V I Lt.", 5,4,J ',"fl. >J I~AVIl.. A~ L Name ot'Bidder Sicrr'lcd bv t;r- ., gcrC64 21st!, be W Address (b EN c-~A. L f\1 G R. Title I-u..-R<!/&A. . tyl,,,J 5'~if.4 , City/State/Zip Code 95'2 -'1'Cj - Z 23/ Te1enhone ~ ,.~ ~i# '.fsr..~ City of Farmington Minnesota Specifications and Request for Proposal for Curbside Recycling Services for Municipal Residential and Commercial Customers August, 2001 Proposals accepted until 2:00PM Thursday, September 20, 2001 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Proposer's Name: Dick's Sanitation, Inc./Lakeville Sanitation, Inc. Address: 8984 215tb Street West, LakevilIe, MN 55044 Phone: 952-469-2239 Page 1 of 11 Proposal For Curbside Recycling Services for Municipal Residential and Commercial Customers Farmington, Minnesota August, 2001 Opening Time: 2:00 PM Opening Date: Thursday, September 20,2001 Honorable City Council City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Gentlemen/Ladies, The undersigned, being familiar with your local conditions, having made the field inspections and investigations deemed necessary, having studied the request for proposals and being familiar with all factors and other conditions affecting the work and cost thereof, hereby propose to furnish all labor, tools, materials, skills, equipment and all else necessary to completely deliver curbside recycling and related services in accordance with the Request for Proposals on file with the City Clerk, 325 Oak Street, Fannington, Minnesota 55024, as follows: Part I - Provide Curbside Recycling Services for Residential Customers a-I) 2002 4450 Single and Multi Family Dwelling Units with Single Family Service @ 2 Dollars .77 Cents; $2.77/unitlmonth = $ 147,9l8.00/year - - - a-2) 2003 4750 Single and Multi Family Dwelling Units with Single Family Service @ ~ Dollars .77 Cents; $2.77/unit/month = $157.890.00/year a-3) 2004 5050 Single and Multi Family Dwelling Units with Single Family Service @ ~ Dollars .87 Cents; $2. 87/unit/month = $173,922.00/year a-4) 2005 5350 Single and Multi Family Dwelling Units with Single Family SerVice @ J. Dollars 05 Cents; $3.05/unitlmonth = $195,810.00/year a-5) 2006 5650 Single and Multi Family Dwelling Units with Single Family Service @ 1 Dollars 05 Cents; $3.05/unit/month = $206.790.00/year Page 2 of 11 b-l) 2002 523 Units in 24 Multi-Family Buildings @ 1 Dollars .65 Cents; $ 1. 65/unit/month = $10.355.40/year b-2) 2003 523 Units in 24 Multi-Family Buildings @ 1 Dollars .65 Cents; $ 1. 65/unit/month = $10.355.40/year b-3) 2004 563 Units in 25 Multi-Family Buildings @ 1 Dollars .73 Cents; $ 1. 73/unit/month = $11.687.88/year b-4) 2005 563 Units in 25 Multi-Family Buildings @ 1 Dollars .73 Cents; $l.73/unit/month = $11.687 .88/year b-5) 2006 603 Units in 26 Multi-Family Buildings @ 1 Dollars .80 Cents; $1.80/unit/month = $13.024.80/year c-1) 2002 All City owned & operated buildings @ 80 Dollars 00 Cents; $80.00/month = $960.00/year c-2) 2003 All City owned & operated buildings @ 80 Dollars 00 Cents; $80.00/month = $960.00/year c-3) 2004 All City owned & operated buildings @ 90 Dollars 00 Cents; $90.00/month = $1.080.00/year c-4) 2005 All City owned & operated buildings @ 90 Dollars 00 Cents; $90.00/month = $1.080.00/year c-5) 2006 All City owned & operated buildings @ 100 Dollars 00 Cents; $lOO.OO/month = $1.200.00/year Page 3 of 11 Part II Provide Recycling Services for Commercial Customers a-I) 2002 P apers Service Size Cost for fIrst container Cost for additional containers 90 gallons $ 7.00/pick up $ 3.65/pick up 2 cy $ 7.50/pick up $ 4.25/pick up 4 cy $ 8.00/pick up $ 4.85/pick up 6 cy $ 9.00/pick up $ 6.65/pick up 8 cy $ 1 O.OO/pick up $ 6.95/pick up Residential service $ 2.77 /pick up $ .75/pick up Cans, Glass, Plastic Service Size Cost for fIrst container Cost for additional containers 90 gallons $ 7.00/pick up $ 3.65/pick up 2 cy $ N/AJpick up $ N/ .Alpick up 4 cy $ N/.AIpick up $ N/ Alpick up 6 cy \ $ N/AJpick up $ N/ .Alpick up 8 cy $ N/ .Alpick up I $ N/ .Alpick up Residential service I $ Included/pick up I $ Included/pick up a-2) 2003 P apers Service Size I Cost for fIrst container Cost for additional containers 90 gallons I $ 7.00/pick up $ 3.65/pick up 2 cy $ 7.50/pick up $ 4.25/pick up 4 cy $ S.OO/pick up $ 4.85/pick up 6 cy I $ 9.00/pick up I $ 6.65/pick up 8 cy $ lO.OO/pick up I $ 6.95/pick up Residential service $ 2.77 /pick up $ .75/pick up Cans, Glass, Plastic · Service Size Cost for first container I Cost for 3.dditional containers I I 90 gallons $ 7.00/pick up $ 3.65/pick up 2 cy $ N/ .Alpick up $ N/iVpick up 4 cy $ N/AJpick up $ N/ .Alpick up 6 cy $ N/ .Alpick up $ N/ .Alpick up \ 8 cy I $ N/ .Alpick up $ N/ .Alpick up Residential service $ IncludedJpick up $ Included/pick up I, Page 4 of 11 a-3) 2004 Pa ers Service Size 90 gallons 2 cy 4 cy 6 cy 8 cy Residential service Cans, Glass, Plastic Service Size Cost for first container Cost for additional containers 90 gallons $ 7 .25/pick up $ 3.85/pick up 2 cy $ N/A/pick up $ N/ Npick up 4 cy $ N/A/pick up $ N/ Npick up 6 cy I $ N/ Npick up I $ N/ Npick up 8 cy I $ N/A/pick up 1 $ N/ Npick up Residential service I S Included/pick up I $ Included/pick up a-4) 2005 P apers Service Size I Cost for first container Cost for additional containers 90 gallons I $ 7.25/pick up $ 3.85/pick up 2 cy $ 7.75/pick up $ 4.45/pick up 4 cy $ S.25/pick up $ 5.05/pick up 6 cy S 9.25/pick up $ 6.85/pick up 8 cy $ 1 0.25/pick up $ 7.15/pick up I Residential service I $ 2.S7/pick up $ .85/pick up Cans, Glass, Plastic Service Size I Cost for first container Cost for additional containers 90 gallons i S 7.25/pick up $ 3.S5/pick up 2 cy I $ N/iVpick up $ N/ Npick up 4 cy I $ N/.A/pick up $ N/ Npick up 6 cy I $ N/ Npick up I $ N/A/pick up 8 cy I $ N/ Alpick up $ N/ Alpick up Residential service I $ Included/pick up $ Included/pick up Page 5 of 11 a-5) 2006 Pa ers Service Size 90 allons 2 cy 4 cy 6 cy 8 cy Residential service Cans, Glass, Plastic Service Size 90 gallons 2 cy 4 cy 6 cy 8 cy Residential service Page 6 of 11 Part ITI ....Alternate Proposal for Solid Waste/Recycling Collections A. Temporary Containers a-I) 2002 3 to 6 yard Temporary Containers for MSW @ 25 Dollars 00 Cents; $25.00/cubic yard a-2) 2003 3 to 6 yard Temporary Containers for MSW @ 25 Dollars 00 Cents; $25.00/cubic yard a-3) 2004 3 to 6 yard Temporary Containers for MSW @ 28 Dollars 00 Cents; $28.00/cubic yard a-4) 2005 3 to 6 yard Temporary Containers for MSW @ 28 Dollars 00 Cents; $28.00/cubic yard a-5) 2006 3 to 6 yard Temporary Containers for MSW @ 30 Dollars 00 Cents; $30.00/cubic yard B. Bulk Item Curbside Pickups b-I) 2002 Curbside Pickup for MSW @ 12 Dollars 00 Cents; $15.00/cubic yard b-2) 2003 Curbside Pickup for MS\V @ .12 Dollars 00 Cents; $15.00Icubic yard b-3) 2004 Curbside Pickup for MS\V @ 17 Dollars 00 Cents; $17.00/cubic yard b-4) 2005 Curbside Pickup for MSW @ 11 Dollars 00 Cents; $17.00/cubic yard b-5) 2006 Curbside Pickup for MSW @ .lli Dollars 00 Cents; $18.00/cubic yard * Please attach a Price List of Typical Bulk Item Extra Charges for Appliances, Fumiture, Tires, etc. Price List will need to be submitted whenever it is revised. Page 7 of 11 C. Curbside Yard Waste Pickup c-l) 2002 Curbside Yard Waste Pickup using a contractor provided 90 gallon container @ 59 Dollars 00 Cents; $59.00/season = $59.00/season c-2) 2003 Curbside Yard Waste Pickup using a contractor provided 90 gallon container @ 59 Dollars 00 Cents; $59.00/season = $59.00/season c-3) 2004 Curbside Yard Waste Pickup using a contractor provided 90 gallon container @ 62 Dollars 00 Cents; $62.00/season = $62.00/season c-4) 2005 Curbside Yard Waste Pickup using a contractor provided 90 gallon container @ 62 Dollars 00 Cents; $62.00/season = $62.00/season c-5) 2006 Curbside Yard Waste Pickup using a contractor provided 90 gallon container @ 68 Dollars 00 Cents; $68.00/season = $68.00/season Page 8 of 11 PART IV. Alternate Proposal for Curbside Cleanup Days CURBSIDE CLEAN UP DAYS 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 I item estimated 4973 5273 5613 5913 6253 hh units trash collection lump sum $ 19,465.65 $ 20,828.35 $ 22,171.35 $ 23,356.35 $ 25,012.00 trash disposal per ton $ 57.00 $ 57.00 $ 57.00 $ 57.00 $ 58.00 tire collection & processing per tire $ 6.00 $ 6.00 $ 6.25 $ 6.25 $ 6.50 electronics collection & processing per pound $ .34 $ .35 $ .35 $ .36 $ .38 appliance collection & processing per appliance $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 32.00 $ 32.00 $ 34.00 scrap metal collection & processing _Lump Sum $ Included $ Included $ Included $ Included $ Included Item 2002 Trash Collection $3.91 per unit Trash Disposal $57.00 per ton Tire Collection & Processing $6.00 per tire Electronics Collection & Processing $.34 per pound Appliance Collection & Processing $30.00 per appliance Collection of Scrap Metal $Inc1uded per unit N e e N 2003 ~ Q Q N Trash Collection $3.95 per unit Trash Disposal $57.00 per ton Tire Collection & Processing $6.00 per tire Electronics Collection & Processing $.35 per pound Appliance Collection & Processing $30.00 per appliance Collection of Scrap Metal $Included per unit Proposed Charge x # of units (4973) $19.465.65 lump sum $57.00 unit price fee $6.00 unit price fee $.34 unit price fee $30.00 unit price fee x # of units (4973) $Inc1uded lump sum x # of units (5273) $20,828.35 lump sum $57.00 unit'price fee $6.00 unit price fee $.35 unit price fee $30.00 unit price fee x # of units (5273) $Included lump sum Page 9 of 11 2004 Trash Collection $3.95 per unit x # of units (5613) $22,171.351um.p sum Trash Disposal $57.00 per ton $57.00 unit price fee Tire Collection & Processing ~ $6.25 per tire $6.25 unit price fee Q Q Electronics Collection & Processing N $.35 per pound $.35 unit price fee Appliance Collection & Processing $32.00 per appliance $32.00 unit price fee Collection of Scrap Metal $Inc1uded per unit x # of units (5613) $Included lump sum 2005 Trash Collection $3.95 per unit x # of units (5913) $23.356.35 lump sum Trash Disposal $57.00 per ton $57.00 unit price fee Tire Collection & Processing 1II $6.25 per tire $6.25 unit price fee Q Q Electronics Collection & Processing N $.36 per pound $.36 unit price fee Appliance Collection & Processing $32.00 per appliance $32.00 unit price fee Collection of Scrap Metal $Inc1uded per unit x # of units (5913) $Inc1uded lump sum Page 10 of 11 2006 Trash Collection $4.00 per unit x # of units (6253) $25.012.00 lump sum Trash Disposal $58.00 per ton $58.00 unit price fee Tire Collection & Processing \C $6.50 per tire $6.50 unit price fee e e Electronics Collection & Processing M $.38 per pound $.38 unit price fee Appliance Collection & Processing $34.00 per appliance $34.00 unit price fee Collection of Scrap Metal $Included per unit x # of units (6253) SIncluded lump sum Accompanying this proposal is a bond, certified check or cash deposit in the amount of SOne Thousand Dollars & No Cents ($1,000.00) made payable to the City of Farmington, Minnesota and the same subject to forfeiture in the event of default on the part of the undersigned to execute the prescribed contract and bond within fifteen (15) days after its submittal to me/us. In submitting this proposal, it is understood that payment will be made by cash or check. It is understood that proposals may not be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days after the date and time set for the opening of proposals. It is understood that the Owner reserves the right to retain the certified check or bond of the three best proposals as determined by the O\\rner for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days after the date set for the opening of the proposals. It is understood that the contractor has included all applicable state sales taxes in all proposals. Respectfully submitted: Dick's Sanitation, Inc. (A Corporation) (An Individual) (A Partnership) General Manager Title Name of Proposer i~ Jlw.Av~ I Brett Anderson Signed by Printed Name of Signer 952-469-2239 8984 2l5th St. West Phone # Street Address 952-469-1146 Lakeville, MN 55044 CirylStal<:iZip Code Fax # Page 11 of 11 BULK ITEMS AND FEES Air Conditioner $45.00 basketball hoop $50.00 bathtub (cast iron) 100.00 fiberglass $50.00 Bed Frame $10.00 Bike $5.00 Box Spring $28.00 Card Table $7.00 Car Door $10.00 car top carrier $25.00 coffee table $8.00 Couch $30.00 Crib Mattress $10.00 Crib $10.00 Desk quote H-A-Bed kitchen chair Lawn mower (push) Lawn mower(riding) laundry tub Loose Misc Trash Loveseat Mattress $45.00 $22.00 $10.00 $15.00 $25.00 $15.00 $15.00 $10.00 $8.00 $10.00 $50.00 exercise bike $15.00 Footboard $15.00 Futonw/mattress $20.00 Garage door openE $15.00 garge door panels $40.00 Grill $15.00 Other Appliances ottoman Pallets Patio Door patio table Ping Pong Table Recliner/stuff chair Pinic Table Refrigerator Roll top desk Sectional shower door Sink snow blower Swing Set (metal) swing set (wood) quote Table TV Stand Tire w/o rim toilet Vaccum Cleaner Vanity Waterbed Mattress Waterbed Frame w/headboard Water Softner Dehumifyer CLOSET DOORS Screen Hollow flutside ,lid Dresser Headboard end table Entertainment ctr ELECTRONICS OPTIONS EAGAN - MATERIAL PROCESSING 651-681-8099 2805 W SVC RD - EAGAN - NEAR COCA-COLA PLANT ST PAUL - ASSET RECOVERY 651-602-0789 $35.00 $3.00 $15.00 100.00 $15.00 $18.00 $25.00 $28.00 $45.00 $5.00 $5.00 $50.00 $15.00 $30.00 $20.00 $30.00 $45.00 $30.00 $55.00 $25.00 $12.00 $100.00 $20.00 $20.00 $10.00 $7.00 $10.00 $5.00 $18.00 $28.00 $20.00 $40.00 $35.00 '09010 ''''-I \.j\O ,~ ;: ,lj ..n '.~'a \~ OJ u. ...,J ~~ :In .. :,,1 '1L a .~' U1 iei ~ \~. a ,lli~ 'f/. it,a !~~: ... '\;; 'Ill \t~ ... ~f I!::! ~ ...;: ~! , ,.. ....CD ;::;.:""' .,,;: Z ~b ....,.. ...~ 0'1= <P- . CD 0;';: 8z \ I b~ 1t.~ ....--- .-:.. F::: ,1.,... r.... ~;;J ir. l~ ~ I i..- - ciS < :s Ii, 1.0::--> ::::\,~- I~ ~ :e.. .=- \()1") s Ie;;. is is is n iSC"1"" is, (f) j\;! ~ 0.... :00 0.... m::t :om o "T1 i I \ i I o o r- r- :x:- ::Il CIJ S Hr .,. '=" .. ,.. ;; n 1-" rt" '< o --1) "T\ OJ l-j 3 1-" ::J to rt" o ::J ~ I--' o o o o o o 1-" ("') ^ (fto (fl lfl OJ :J 1-" rt" OJ rt" 1-" o ::J o :;> ~ m I i \I9 1...0 \ I-' CP I 5' I-' :c m ;:: =i .... m :c ...., <11 Co ...., ~ ~ to \::~~ \(~",'~~! \,~] ! ""''''J i~~~ \i~ .~ ]~ l \t~'li 11 ~l !~ '~~ ~.I,j }!f~ f~j m :\1 1'; 'Ii ~, ill ~, :'t! .~ '" !:~1 a r ...,J ...,J r U1 ::-- -J -J ::-- CJ1 ... ~;B@YtJ\ ..\ ....A .': "':'j .... ~..... ............ ..' L. '~'\\l.:A . '\, .1 .:-0 . .:.:,. . ,., . . . ::~ .~<: :;lil .::.:~ :;:; ''J I \:J .;[T1 ::.:':.'1 ',-;:r .:..:..... ....: ..- ....... lWiHli@ :; 2002 Holiday Schedule January February March 5 M T W T F 5 5 M T W T F 5 5 M T W T F 5 II]] 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13111]]] 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 7 IlIJ::[] 20 21 22 23 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 April June 5 M T W T F 5 5 M T W T F 5 5 M T W T F 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 29 30 26 flI][] 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 July August September 5 M T W T F 5 5 M T W T F 5 5 M T W T F 5 1 2 3D]]6 1 2 3 1 DJJ4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 October November December 5 M T W T F 5 5 M T W T F 5 5 M T W T F 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1O~16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 23 22~27 28 27 28 29 30 31 24 (1[] 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 2 3 4 Multi-Family Housing Units - Farmington, MN 2001 Address Name # of Units 24 Elm St. 11 18 Walnut St. Towerview Apts. 27 1321 Centennial Farmington Apts. 18 1337 Centennial Farmington Apts. 18 811 - 8th St. Townsed.ge Apts. 17 900 - 8th St. 6 521 - 3rd St. Walnut Apts. 17 1020-3rd St. Fairview Apts. 17 515 Elm St. 18 600 Oak St. 6 917 - 9th St. 6 701 Heritage Way 8 1330 Centennial Dr. Centennial Apartments 8 1320 Centennial Dr. Centennial Apartments 8 640 Park Dr. 8 501 Main St. 3 720 - 3rd St. 3 209 Oak St. 3 916 - 10th St. 4 300 Spruce St. Spruce Place 60 315 Spruce St. Red Oak Manor 37 1010 Main St. Trinity Terrace 55 4345 220th St. Westview Apartments 8 4461 Westdel Rd. Westview Manor Homes 8 374 Joe, City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council M~ers City Administrator )) ,~ -~_../ Date Filed: 7-3-06 Date Complete: 7-25-06 Action Deadline: 10-31-06 FROM: Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner SUBJECT: 1) Adopt Resolution - Preliminary and Final Plat - Charleswood Marketplace 2) Site Plan Review - CVS Pharmacy and Retail Center DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION Kami, Inc. has submitted a Preliminary and Final Plat for Charleswood Marketplace. The property is located at the southwest comer of Pilot Knob Road (CSAR 31) and 195th Street (CSAR 64) - Exhibit A. The applicant is proposing 3 commercial lots and one outlot on 4.89 acres of land. Also attached as Exhibit B is the overall site plan for the proposed development. Preliminarv and Final Plat Kami, Inc. is proposing to subdivide 4.89 acres of commercial land into three lots and one outlot. The property is currently zoned B-1, Highway Business which requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of75 feet. The lot sizes and widths are proposed as follows: Lot Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot Size 67,716 sf 68,814 sf 54,505 sf Lot Width 227.19 feet 257.50 feet 199.00 feet All of the lot sizes and widths meet the minimum standards of the B-1 Zoning District. Parks & Recreation Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director, is recommending that the City take cash in lieu of land to satisfy the park dedication requirement as the property is just under five acres in size. Attached as Exhibit C is a memo from the Parks and Recreation Director providing his recommendations for this development. As stated in the aforementioned memo, Mr. Distad is recommending that the developer extend the proposed internal sidewalk, which is being shown to stop at the northeast comer of the retail center, south to Eureka Avenue. Transportation The site is adjacent to three existing roadways, those being: 195th Street (CSAR 64) to the north, Pilot Knob Road (CSAR 31) to the east, and Eureka A venue to the west and south. The developer is proposing three accesses to the site, all from Eureka A venue. The second or middle access into the site straddles the property lines of the three proposed lots. A cross easement will have to be provided to allow the necessary ingress and egress at this access point. The Dakota County Plat Commission met on September 5, 2006 and reviewed a request from the City regarding not restricting the access at the intersection of 195th Street and Eureka Avenue to a right-in, right-out intersection until such time as when traffic warrants and movements require this access to be restricted. Attached as Exhibit D is a letter from the Dakota County Plat Commission dated September 6, indicating that the intersection of 195th Street and Eureka Avenue will be allowed to remain a full intersection until traffic volumes and movements warrant the need for this intersection to be restricted to a right-in, right-out movement. Engineering Engineering has reviewed the plat application and provided the applicant with a comment letter. The Engineering Division has recommended approval of the plat contingent upon satisfaction of any engineering comments. Well Site The City has identified the need to acquire a well site within this property. The well site the developer is proposing is Outlot A. The Engineering Department has reviewed this location and will agree upon this location provided certain conditions/items are fully understood by the developer. Those items are as follows: 1. A restrictive easement will have to be obtained and recorded, limiting access to the drive in specific circumstances (no hazardous chemical trucks, etc.) 2. When the well is under construction, this easternmost north/south drive will have to be closed down in its entirety until the project is completed (the drive may be closed for up to one year). These items will be made a contingency to the approval of the plat. In addition, these items will be addressed further within the development contract. Gas Line Easement As previously mentioned, the site is encumbered with a sixty (60') foot wide Mid-America Pipeline Co. easement. The developer is in the process of negotiating with the gas company to verify any restrictions that the Mid-America Pipeline may impose upon encroachments into their easement. The developer will have to provide the City with documentation prior to filing of the plat with Dakota County that the gas company has agreed to allow development (i.e., paving, vehicular parking, internal roadways, etc.) within its easement. This is a contingency to the approval of the plat and site plan. Site Plan The Charleswood Marketplace development will consist of three retail buildings: an approximately 12,000 square foot CVS Pharmacy, an approximately 10,950 square foot one-story strip retail facility, and a 10,000 square foot, two story structure. The strip retail center and the pharmacy are planned to be developed immediately and the two-story building is being proposed as a future development. Attached as Exhibit E are elevation renderings for the CVS Pharmacy building and the strip retail center building. It should be noted that a conditional use permit may be required depending on the type of use that will be proposed for the various buildings. Attached as Exhibit F is a list of the permitted and conditional uses allowed within the B-1 zoning district. Minimum Bulk Standards/Setbacks The minimum bulk standard for the B-1 zoning district are as follows: . Front Yard Setback: 30 feet* . Side Yard Setback: 10 feet . Rear Yard Setback: 10 feet Minimum side and rear yard abutting any residential district: . Off-street parking and access drives: 10 feet . Public and semipublic buildings: 35 feet . Recreational, entertainment, commercial and industrial uses: 50 feet . Maximum lot coverage of all structures: 25% *The building setbacks off of Pilot Knob Road must be at least 50 feet per Section 10-4-1 (L) of the City Code, as Pilot Knob is classified as a minor arterial road. The proposed building setbacks as shown on the attached site plan meet or exceed the minimum setbacks and bulk standards of the B-1 zoning district. Off-street parking The parking requirements for retail facilities per the City Code are as follows: At least one off-street parking space for each 200 square feet of floor area up to a total floor area of 10,000 square feet. At least one off-street parking space for each 250 square feet of floor area in a building that has between 10,001 and 30,000 square feet. At least one off- street parking space for each 300 square feet of floor area in a building that has more than 30,000 square feet. This would require that a total of 96 off-street parking stalls be provided with the first phase. The site plan shows 140 total parking stalls being provided in the first phase of the development (CVS and strip retail center). The developer is showing the ghosting of a total of 76 stalls in the second phase. It should be noted that the parking requirements for the second phase (the proposed lot 3) will ultimately be determined at a later date when or if the lot is developed. Trash Enclosure Locations The developer is proposing two locations for trash enclosures. The one servicing the pharmacy is shown southwest of the proposed pharmacy building adjacent to the drive-thru. The trash enclosure servicing the strip retail center is located to the south of the proposed multi-tenant building in the easternmost portion of the parking area. The Solid Waste Supervisor has indicated that the location of garbage containers and garbage enclosures have appropriate access for City garbage trucks to remove the garbage. Landscaping Overall, the landscape plan was acceptable. Lee Smick, City Planner, reviewed the landscape plan and offered the following comments: 1. No planting is allowed within the right-of-way for 195th Street and Pilot Knob Road. All planting shall remain within the property boundaries. 2. On the east side of the site next to the 19 parking spaces, shrubs need to be shown to meet Section 10-6-10 D (6a) of the Zoning Code. Approval by the gas company is required and needs to be submitted to the City. A revised landscape plan will need to be submitted to the Planning Division for final approval. Plannin1! Commission Meetin1! At the Planning Commission meeting on September 13, 2006, the Commission recommended approval of Preliminary and Final Plat for Charleswood Marketplace contingent upon the following conditions: 1. The satisfaction of any engineering and planning comments. 2. A restrictive easement must be obtained and recorded, limiting access to the drive in specific circumstances (i.e., no hazardous chemical trucks, etc.) 3. During the well site construction the easternmost north/south drive on the site will have to be closed down in its entirety until the project is completed, which may require the drive to be closed for up to one year. 4. The developer shall provide the City with written documentation regarding Mid America Pipeline Company's approval of construction and development within its gas easement. 5. The preparation and execution ofthe Development Contract and approval of the construction plans for grading, stormwater and utilities by the Engineering Division. 6. The submittal of a landscape plan acceptable to the City Planner. The Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat and forwarded this recommendation onto the City Council. The Planning Commission also approved the attached site plan for this development at the September 13, 2006 meeting. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the attached resolution approving the preliminary and final plat for Charleswood Marketplace contingent upon the following conditions: 1. The satisfaction of any engineering and planning comments. 2. A restrictive easement must be obtained and recorded, limiting access to the drive in specific circumstances (i.e., no hazardous chemical trucks, etc.) 3. During the well site construction the easternmost north/south drive on the site will have to be closed down in its entirety until the project is completed, which may require the drive to be closed for up to one year. 4. The developer shall provide the City with written documentation regarding Mid America Pipeline Company's approval of construction and development within its gas easement. 5. The preparation and execution of the Development Contract and approval of the construction plans for grading, stormwater and utilities by the Engineering Division. 6. The submittal of a landscape plan acceptable to the City Planner. Respectfully submitted, T~U~ Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner Cc: Paul Tucci, Oppidan, Inc. Krista Fleming, Newland Communities .~:- ,~;~ " "C'.. " ,,"''' /'- .'>>., ,<?" // ":'" " / . \'. "" / ':' ,,>" " // ':~. y , / c. / "/ '. .,' / ,. "<, '.,' /' " / " ',,- " ;-. / " / " / " " :--,.... / ,'. '> \ "" / .' / ':', / I / c. . I /. .-' - 1//,-. ..............~...::,.., --,:'~ ....... '..') \, '- ~. \u,~:nT ,u, ,::nu:'iT';. ~~iGHT ... I I '" I ~_,L_____ - A~"IU!) '. ,----- I I I I I I ',> r---,~- I I I I I ~----- I .'. I I I I I ,----- I I I I '. ~ \. , , \, g~ ~, .., \, ... l:l:l ~~ " -" ." ~g.g ; ~~ f~5'.. "'2,::r ~m'i3. D!~ ~"tl;: ?~l g-~g l~i I ~ . I ~ ~ ~ . c ~!~g~ ~~t~~ ~~ ~~ ~ S:"-Ol" Z.. ~." ~~I ~ \, \ .--, \ I I I I I I I \ l I I I I I ~ \ \ / / / / r----------------------------------------~ -~ "" " " " " r----- I I I I mu .~'ii1' i~~~~ ihg~ d"l. ~~~.~ '~+I ~I~ L. ;1 : . ~h "__L _.. r-- T ~~ j' ~ ! ~ . ~i !~ g~ ,. 38 '0 ~,[ i!. i"~ ;'" ~n ~'i" ~~ .(;g ~! j"[ ~,[ 2,'i :f . ~~ ~ " ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ hu .i~ 6 ., ~ zo m ~~ ? "~'F"lg H ~SihH.j ~1 ~i~~~~i~[ ~ !-~i~E~~o;~ ~ ;;~.Il&~g;i ~ ~~~~I~~~& ~ m~mH ~ ~f~fi~f~1 J ~"""ii-aae. :~i. ~.~i~~~ . . 0 .~ ~ig~.h;~ I:m~~ ;~~.~~!if~ f.. ~~!~i~!~f ! i;~i~i~~f i t::~: ~~i~ag _ ~g!i;~~~f8 i .~._....~ i ;~~~~~ili .- ~~U~~g~. i 6'n~..... ~'i.z t ~~~ii:~~oc ~ ~;J~;~~~~ t ~i[g~i'8~~ I mlmii .. H ~'m.H .i ~~o i~ ~ ~~~~ i a ma H ~m ~ ~:li;li; I"'S I ~ il : ~~~I . i~ l 2 ~ ~J~III' ~~U~~'il.., , . ~ ~.il il f :!i 0 i ~~i ~~; 0 . I eaa ~~ TnG2~OO. ~ n~u~~nUU ~ i~~ n u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; p g! ~ ~~ l!i l!i ~ ! .~g ....... n.' II I I I I I I I I \ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ u j i i ! i i 11 i ~ p~~ 18 ~ nee c c P n 0 ~ i~~ . h ~ d Ii h i ~ i d~ ~n:I!U s ~ ~ ~~" ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~cn~~ ;~pp ~~~~ ~~~~ .' !f~ ~~ .~ oo~~ l;l~ .~ ;f- " ~ ~ ~1111;~I:H+fl'I~~ tlr P! 11111111m~ llilh'ii',,!," ;j ! ! ' ~; !,il > !' ;;;:2 1'1 ' if iiiHH~iih ~ t~fi~ ig . ~ . . HH . iI" ~ <II l!t ~ '- ~ >> ~ ~ i~JflHiqr~ ~ ~~~:g ~~ o. o " ;>:J;>:J : ~ ~ ~ !iH ~ ~'5- ^ e- If 'ld;twh[[ t:~~~.:~ n I ," mm , ' Ill! -iU'> () ~ ~ ~ nl~ii~~ik f;,~~~ 'i~ ~ ~8'" > ~ 5- s:~ , ~ ~ z [ 0' In n ~~drhil.fH ~-~~i p: m ,'[fI'lH!,!'1 . r <II no I '" . t ,,\ il" 'j mo -' I ~ ~ ;t a ~ I --, "- I "" I >" I ,., / " ,-- I / ""- I /.. > /., '.' / I / ".' I ,-. / I / .,' / I J / '::. / '-- J.... -- --l., '::' / .. '---.. / '.~' ---"y / / " / I I I I ~ Ts,~d;7/ ..----.~ ~;' I -,",I L"j . ---T L__ : +- flild ...L. _ _ ...,""S>:5:s. '';'.', I I I I I I,,; I l~_ : .,,~ I '\ ~ _~~ _ I,,, ,!, I '>::1 ~ \~\ : ". ," ;';1 :'} I ~i~ '. ~ -,-~ "il ::. I ....' ~ .." . I. .a ~!~ .; ~--~ :~:17 :~; I .,,, ~ ~;:" ..: I ',' 0 71,,, \,.J '.' g ml:" I / \1 I / I ~ l 1.-/ ~ ---- : I ~ 8~ I I '" :Ii ". ~ "'--~ }':f, L - ::tJ ~... -"T -- '-- -f-o~.,/ -t-- ,--~ -_. - - --r _ .... - - - -; ..0.... ... - - c:;-; ~ - -"': - _ _'2. _ -'- _ __, !;:: ""'" ""- ' , C ,- " 1 I :~: ~:~ (') I ~:~ ~;~ 111 I .:. on I i:: :~~ I i'~; :'~; I '.' '. I I /" /" /' /' / I I I I I I I I I G I I ',:. ..J I I I IT." Iii; I I I L___ m E~ ~J -,;. ,;:' " .-:. . ">............ ". ,,";.,> ." / ""<'i" .'. "..~ . / ~.~ / / ". " / ':., " " / / ,.. / ."".. ,,> ,/ / .:. > "- --< / '::' / "" <" '::' / V..' / "" / " / V ~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~,i~;~ tV"ll"" NO. 'OS"1t' /lB. 8 --t----iO~98 " :.;. Cb ~~ In soo/J2.'V:' '.J5.f.57 't:l L___==_~'~---266-:e7 '" i ). ,- ......J ~---...... " " " " I I I I ~:r,~G [)A~:OTf". [:OL':HTY ~~:GHT ~!r- WAY ;v:.u.~: HO. 1;H: ~~~~~ 1 .,.. -<", I ~808il '--0 ~~a~~ ~:z~: :im ~g~~~ ~~j:l~ ~~~~ -<Kj f'1 o ~ ~~ ~ ~ffi ~ ;~ z .....~ I ~: ~ 8- ~ ,;~ ~ i~ ~ UI >.. ~.I 8. 6~ ~~'I )!~ ggt> ~~I :~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ r~e ~a~ ~~; ;~ ;~: 1~11" .., 0 1m !~ iFli ~ ~ t ; L '1'; ;a .,' r. I i~ !!~l . ~ ~ ~; ~ a. '" B I. ! , m~ . . ::;'.pp;::: ~~ 1m ~i ........... 0000 00 00000 .. "'....'" '>>~ H '~~>> ~ ~~g ~~~~~ <r,...,"";J ): ::r:~r 2~' ~ z 0 ~ ~ n n f':. ~ 2 " ): J) -< c is ;0 0 ~ I :E 0 I ----- ' 1+ grO z 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ lif Cor Oull"t, ~~~ ~IIII fOl'I'fl*I'I'~ \ 1 ~ i' "I! 11111111111~ IH1HI',,!," d ! ! s:2 ,I, ' ~ r , I '511'lIH~' ~ ~ !~: ~ I! 1,.lll,!ll'" -Ii; ~. 5: )>)> HHHP" ~~ 1p~ ~ I ~! i.t I'!.i ~ ~ ::,t. f . t O. 7-J7-J ~ ? IIJ!iiHj![~; !;l~. i, ~~n A' c;: !',i ill '11 . l! ~ ,j"ll' . ., ''''f' d ,.., z CT> CT> hll' 11'1, 1'1! '''I ., ~ --<<.r> Z ~ s:~ r I'!' , ' . I'PI' II j, ;~;.! ': 'rill.l., ;" ., ~ ~ I' pHjil :ili 'zn >n S~ ~ ~~~ no ~ ~~ ~R ~~~ c ~S~ 0 " z z ~f; 0 9 z ~~~ e~ ~ 6 ~~~ .0 ~ n~ ~ ~~'" z, ~z 0 ~~~ zo, ~~ 3~ 0 ~ , ~~~ cc ~ ~c o. ~ ~:~ ~ 6l: ~ zs: :1 ~~~ ~ z. ~z ~~~ QE > ~; ~ Z I 0'> > ~> ~ z~~ OC. I~ 6 ~ z >zo c~ <n >mz 0 0 z<o I=;o S:. fiB i~~ ~ >"0 a~ I ~ ~ ~i? :5~ ~ ~mQ ::ax z;" ~ " -Q~ >, ~~ ~oc ~.8 0 ~8~ s 200 >c 5 > n ,n zm z <0 ~ >z~ o~ ~a ~ 2~~ g~~ ~~ ~~ ;~~ >m .0 ~ ~~~ I mz no ~, Qz ~~Q ~~ z ~Q Q ~ ::!"'~ -<~ o " ~ x i!; ~ 0 s: ~ ~ ~ " z C) " , ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ Imm 0' lil~ 1111 ~ ~;:;~ g;~~ ~~~ :g~~ " 3:!2 ~~~ ~~~Q z;:l "0 ~ ~~~ ~:;;;:~ 8'5": li ~~ ~~C1~ ~i~~ ~ ~~ 0 m~1 ~ "'5 !i! :t...:: :::: ~x ~ m ;0 SE z ~ ~ :- '" Z C) ~~ , o ,.., o z ;ij o s: ~ >- " z C) " ;: r !!~~ 8 ~~ ~~~g ~ ~~ ~58~ !5 o~ ~~~" ~ ~i ~~~2 8 ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~I~~ ~ ~x i ~~ n I!H! n I! . ~ ~~ ~~ ~~i~~ - ~ ~~ ~ 5~ ~~ ~eE~g ~ 85 ~ I~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~, '~ ;m~ I"g ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ "'~u:: ;:~ ~~ ;S5 ~ ~~ s: ~z ~" >~ zn ~ ~IIII ~n~l! ~ '!r, ,'J ~ itll ' l!l!l .[., ~.-.' hp~ "i,lfE !It! 0 .1: ,11 rll i III ] 111111!~t [HIL;I![',!:! I I ,-' ['!ill'!,I'I', . ." ~ii'\l!i!d ~ ~~Ht , I'dt,,'.!n, "'.,~. . tIF:!!!!!'i 'IH' 'd~HPhl; f:~~~! I 'fll'I'j.b'll . " I ,. 'II" ! "I i. ~ ~ ~ ! I 3:2 ~' ~ ~ 3 >> !~L I ~. "'''' I~ 0; ;:::;:;~ ~8i ~ 3: -< en i" s:~ no ~o ~(o 2 ~ ~ g It Ii I!! II! II i ill i n II n 111111 i i i Ii i !lllll; lillll HHHtHI !l> .'.''''''''"<!lel !l ----- --- --- --- --- ~ -, - - - "-----. '/r--__ J---- " - If' -, r--___ -r" " -- ___ _ _ :(: II! ---7Ir-,,,'<l.~,, Iff /11 /// '''-, ',,~, :: D: I,' ~ /;,' ",,, " ,{, ~ '}' ~ ' , > '"0.,, '(' ., I I". 'I, //^ '.., I r :~:! 1/ I I I // / " ""~~" /1' ~ I I 1/1 fJ I I ',,-,If "'- -------1 L : 1: /; / ~ ~.: /~/ " "."" - - --1------:1..'--- iI' ~ ///~ '>,1'-" -- -:-jL..... /~/ ~ /~/'<", " /// ~ :.' / / / , " / ................ '-..1// 1//' '," "- ........./ < /// ',," '7 " '" // / ) y r::=--=-r--- """, /// e / / I i,r----::-:;r-....... '<,< ~.." ;/;/ j f ,dr-,.....,............... "',, i./ / III II' '....." " " ./ / ,r'l I :(! ~ il! ''-,,, " ,,' / / /7, ~ ::: ; f i ~ ... : Ii ~ " .A ~ ,,'vI / _ 1/ is": I I Q u' /~^" '"<'.S v t>> I J I!I 1/ Ii:': ../J/', " .I' I'l /1/ ~ /(~I ", " fl f': /1/ /%/ ",' :ft IIi /~/ ~ ) ') III I / .,//; ~~:~ / / /' I -...............J I: /// !. //'" fr~ ....,-J I Il_//':/ Q / / /"..... / / ..... -1.. ..... ( / -___ / / ' _______ ..... .....1(. ---~; / ------- ..... / .....--.( / m II ~ 9--r ~il ~; i 1"~ l[t '!' jJi H. tla li- t f fa . . €) @~ - m'~ ~ ~ !.~ in 'i' IIi h' , t<<oti ~ ~ ii- ~l Hili I If. ~ ti f , if f ~l l r, t h. ., t "i I I; ~~; ~; i'Wtl~ in; ; -( I!; i'i~ ~p ~H I: ~~I" ~I m~1 ,I in ;t lil.t iir~~ ii- .Ii E!~! ~. ~ ~~: IVi I~j~ !i ~~l i~ Inlt Hi' l ii ~H IHl in HI ~ ~ tit I' '~~~';' ill! 0<.1 ,h ..,~. ~,' ,! . '" '2 !f:I.~ i g.;- I Joe...\! .il g.j !l,!:' h l ,...1..1 "'!ll ~ .'f 1 '" ,<.' i Po h! ,"t! B~.o . ,~~ , . b ; .'h l!i~ , j' I.I q.1i ~~ ~~ - I 8. H !!os" iffJ ~~,.'" il)1: il'H! ". .' i ~~~ H tIn jHl 1 ~I f; ~~I'~!~ ~~ f U[ ! jH:i ill~ ~~Ii J j} i' ;.,~ ;~! J~ I ~}} " ! o.8!l.1i fff~ -~fll a.l! 2g- t ~ afl f If.1 iUt ~;. ~j} a I' ; ; It fag. ",.! .! tl ". ' - r 0 lit} lB' ~ h t ... j I . ~i'" 1 i " , <i ,I L .. h .i . [ ~l i' { all. I I I I I e ~;; I ~., I ~ .- ~ .,. I J _.:...-------1 ~ / / !/ --- I , , I , , ~ ~ -~ ---~------- / ~-~L / I ( I I ~~""/ ~~~I ~ ~~; I -,,~., I 11111 III I! II,',',', \ i ~ lLI: II I III I I I I I I L'~ ~_ __________________~~_~,.-----------------~m'~ ~ , 0 Plot Knob 'R;; ~~,. ""'iCS1ii No. $/) \ -Et-~ ~ ' iii 0tII/or8 ---~~~~=--=~=---=~=---~~~~~~~=---=~ ;~~\ --;---- ~ I ,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------" __--------[~ It'-----fJ==- - ~ ~II --11--/,-- r I J ------ - __------ 'I" _ ------T ' ! ~ ~~~ r r~ Ilr 1IIIIlllll;I;~i q -, ;1 n , HI!i iH ~ fH i [" c III 1" l' i ~ !" nlin,p"li! __ iJ :> Hi:tH.~i ~ ~ 1,F~~ ~~ ~ ~i;Hii!lti! ~ !~nt ~i o. ';:~;;;;I;' I,;,,,: , 'tl>~~Pl~'H ~n::r l'~ ~ I, ,I'l'''!' ",. l' '" ",i'l'.lil!I' I' If In f;!i!IIl' l !~ I~ !~i <.. 5",f' ~ ~ ~ : I~.~ i I , .~~~ . , 'I I :, I '!Ii 'I \~ if , 1& .." , , , , , , , , , , , , , I: I' L_______ L____ ~ ;!I: ._~ !I '" - A_ ,---- I i----u- I: I: 1\ I: I L___u__ ir=-=== I: I: I: I: I: ~'==== I i---u-- I: 1\ I: I: I L_uu__ Ir =-- =--=--- I: I: I: I: I: I: I : I I /''% I \ /'0/ I : /';:/ ((// I L_______ L___ $:~ >> "'^' ~~ -< V> ~~ no "'0 ~-~.S JlJi,}cT 5 5= r (65U 463-71U. Fax (651) 463-2591 \fifWW,d,fannmg1tOn,mn, us TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director RE: Charleswood Marketplace Plat DATE: July 31, 2006 INTRODUCTION Parks and Recreation Depmiment staff members have reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan for the Charleswood Marketplace Development (the Development). DISCUSSION Since the Development is a small commercial development of just under five acres, it is being recommended that the City take cash in lieu of land in order to satisfy the park dedication requirements for the Development. There are good pedestrian connections and access around the periphery of the Development. Regarding pedestrian cOlU1ections within the Development, staff is recommending that additional sidewalks be constructed so that pedestrians can move better internally within the Development. Attached is Exhibit A that shows additional recOllli11ended sidewalk cOlli1ections that will allow pedestrian movement in the Development. The Parks and Recreation Director and Solid Waste Supervisor have reviewed the site plan for solid waste container locations. The Solid Waste Supervisor has indicated that the location of garbage containers and garbage enclosures have appropriate access for City garbage trucks to remove garbage. ACTION REQUESTED The following approvals are being recommended: 1. Approve taking cash in lieu of land for the park dedication requirement to be met 2. Approve constructing additional sidewalks to provide pedestrian cOlU1ections through the internal areas of the Development 3. Approve the location of the garbage containers mld garbage enclosures Respectfully Submitted, ....~ I . ". .r' i" r....L. I .:.~ / fJ' ,\ i ,..' -- r '" '. ) " ." J ' .' 1-, ,,' . .,; - !t'. . .~.~ ~."",A-.....,~;~... ,,~ ~"'.(: l:'.",:_ ,.' : >-/ 1.( ,,-f~ ~ -- .... Randy Distad Parks and Recreation Director cc: Benl10 Klotz II. . ("1 V f.hl ,7 rr (" - ) ?:-I'- ...,.. "- '"7 r---- I r------- I: I: I: I: I L_______ r ,==== I: I: I: I: I: I- '=~~~ I i------- I: I I: I: ! I: I L_______ 1....=--=--=--- I: I: I: Ii I: I: II 1'/ I I ,,-%~ I 1,'/.;" I ~/.... (( W'&.DY .... .,...tIJ A I L______ c......_.. ~_~,.- 1 L___ _ _ _ /C&AH. No. 8t/ \ I --- - -- - -- - - --- ----- --- -~ ---'l;---- ------------- --------- ~~ ; I _- r--------------------------------------- -' ~~~ _ --l ~II _-----ij-=~~----------~ rjJ>----- :1===- ~ ~ ~~~z ~111:~I*I*~~~r.~ 1 ~!: !\ illl! 1I1111111,~,.~ 11111:,'llliil!"'illl ~',il-~' ! i _ !1 ---r~~ ~s:;! I ~ 1,li" ' 1,II'I'll!/' IpH" n' ;~l~ ~ s ~ Q e -< .. fl. i , ,!lii,1ill. lhr "1' [ ~ ~ ~ z ' ~, 5: ~ ~ ~ hi ~ f llIillllU11 II I '" ~ h1 8 III' : : l I ; 111 \ ' ,'::1 I-II.'" '<.H~"c' ;H.'<-' :! I , " , , 1111I111!elllll;lllllilihlllllll liP lulU III II InJlIIIII'''1 11111 Ii i 111:lftft~.t~1 I ;::115' ~ P j:l F 15 ,.,... ,. p m ii H[}H ~i flii!i ~H n~ i 1"1 !ti tiH fn fIll I'l~iiji mil t,rl qh In h "I it ;'l"rif I Jllft Uti ti~ If I~ II I ill. ~ lit t~ II ,f. lr III il~l t }I !i'llld~~ ~~ ! ) I~ lllti rhl ~ 1~1 it ~tti ~lll ~ II !if *:~~; .! .~, I~ U~ tIn i i lil }! liiJ VIi i .1 Iii hi ~~ D~ ~~ f Ul II W f t U f j f'! n tH~ it!! J Ii iil ni (i ! iill' ~ 1 I rIll ' l I lit! e:II I II It I' iii ii !, " I' fl ~ IIi! hi ~ i I h "e ! .:: 'I [11'1 ;( fl . i If ~f iP O~ D1 it ~ tr.. ~., 4-- C1' -+- (/.'. -f-:; .- oJ , :f;" l'l ~o o' - Ii ..' ~ q...~U\ 51 t b'-t9 ~ ~ '0:. ~ _.~ g g .:s \l-' '::::;.""';:;>V\ '" t ~<;) '- tl ~ I 0\ ~c:;. ~t ~~. -'D :tiP ~ ~ i~ ~r ~ . 7\ v\ P l'.t""'"rel ............ -.... I I I I I I I I-.J -.... / / / -.... -.... ------ ~ ~? I :~ .,. --------- - .......... ..... ...- ...- ...- ...- / I I l~t. I 'I I :1 I :1 \1 If , 1& -- r---_-:: r- - - _ I/r----- ,- , , -.,/,..-....-........... 'I' "........ ....... I , '" ' :11 ' I ", '" '" '" U1 "\, , I: I: I: Ii I: I: I: I' L_______ L____ m x 7"" - I t::> + ~ & i: rn I EInIaI A_ ! ,.. t . September 6, 2006 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Re: CHARLESWOOD MARKETPLACE The Dakota County Plat Commission met on September 5, 2006, to consider the preliminary plat of the above referenced plat. The plat is adj acent to CSAH 31, and is therefore subj ect to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. This preliminary plat was discussed as requested by the City. The City and developer of this project understand that sometime in the future, it is anticipated that the traffic volumes and movements will warrant the need to restrict access along 195th Street at Eureka Avenue and understand that the existing full access would change to right-in/right-out. The City is asking to delay the change until it is warranted, rather than restrict the access at this time. The City, through the development process would address the County's concerns with issues that might arise with the future restriction of this intersection. The Plat Commission stated some concerns of not restricting access today; however, they agreed with the City to allow the existing full access at this time. The concerns of the Plat Commission were to determine the best way to put people on notice that the access will be restricted to right turns only at some point in the future. There should be language in the City's development agreement and deeds regarding the access restriction to right turns only. The City should determine the best way to communicate to the property owners in the area that the access would change from a full access to a right-turns only access in the future The Plat Commission has approved the preliminary plat provided that the described conditions are met. The Ordinance requires submittal of a final plat for review by the Plat Commission before a recommendation is made to the County Board of Commissioners. Traffic volumes on CSAH 31 were 8,800 in 2003 and are anticipated to be 20,000 ADT by the year 2025. These traffic volumes indicate that current Minnesota noise standards for residential units could be exceeded for the proposed plat. Residential developments along County highways commonly result in noise complaints. In order for noise levels from the highway to meet acceptable levels for adjacent residential units, substantial building setbacks, buffer areas, and other noise mitigation elements should be incorporated into this development. City of Farmington Page two September 6, 2006 No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Transportation Department and no permit will be issued until the plat has been filed with the County Recorder's Office. The Plat Commission does not review or approve the actual engineering design of proposed accesses or other improvements to be made in the right of way. The Plat Commission highly recommends early contact with the Transportation Department to discuss the permitting process which reviews the design and may require construction of highway improvements, including, but not limited to, turn lanes, drainage features, limitations on intersecting street widths, allowance and size of medians, etc. Please contact Gordon McConnell regarding permitting questions at (952) 891-7115 or Todd Tollefson regarding Plat Commission or Plat Ordinance questions at (952) 891-7070. Sincerely, Todd B. Tollefson Secretary, Plat Commission c: Loucks Associates . . .~ 1':)l17611. IS" - ( ,- .,-- :Il . i ~ .~ n q ill 9 w~1t Iii a ~ ~ n gi;,li~. " to ~ill5! 21' 1 " ~ j~ ?i ~ @l) < ~~ H:.! Ii [ ,I. f :. ~ n Il Y.' "-1'5', n Iii ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~I~ Ilij . Ii li -. i )> ~ ~ ~ .. . -t~ t.ol':\i.' ! @l) en i I f:!l 0 ~Iii> ~i~ ; !~~ ~, ~ ~ ~ !I I ~ ; -f:'>. :::t ll: Y ;8 : 2.-8.. g ~ ~ --->. VI ~..-.........;., '3 I if @ '3 8 I (,0 ~-'==il '!(~I\ \ '~ \~, 0.) ,--- ; GB ilJ1s: ~ r::J 'ON ., l> !. Z b, z ['l ;g l> Z il?]~ M , l~ ~ k- ~ ~ n ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ 0 I ~ ;0 "U ~ r l> Z . . " " ~ , " < ~ o ~ ~ ~n " ~ 8 ~ ~ z _ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ sg ~ e'i ~ ?J --I " , > ~~~~~. Uh~i s,~~~;; ~~:;:~;;:~ ~,~-~. i"''''). ~ ol'~'~ ~'~.h ~~8~ili~ ~~~~~~ . <,"0. ~o ~ '" ID~ ._ - ~ U)[~ .-~,. ~ 5 ~,,~ n~ ~ 1.0 ~ 0 ::.:0 ~,,~ ..... " y? g < ~l ""~~ 1l ~l: ~ o ~ '19(') 1< ~cn ~, I, !)iIJU ill, II :i~'"' li!lj'll> i~~~' l' ~ .~: II z o I o ~ ~ u , ". :z > " " :1 E ~ Uil~ '" ~ 00 00 -----" g.p ~~~. ~i:!~ ::;;101~ ,~~ ~~ ~ '. " \g@g8 ~ml ~~~~; t~;~~ g ~ ~ 3r-,8n ~!~i ~~~ ::c r.r,1~ '-( <> ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ffi~ 'g~ en z~8 ~i< '<l c: ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~;:;; ~:>:I ~ ~~ g~~~ ~ d~ g;:~~ ~ ~~ ~. 2 >~ ~ ;:;:12 ~~ i5 "'~ .::'de:' ~~ z: ~ ~ ~; ~i en <f:j !i*t~ .>e. f VI . . h2n~ H'" .. 0:: 6~g!~ !:j _m ~~i() .. - --... - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~it ' ~ !3 ~ l ~ I. r iUHU h '11"'P ~ nun' ~ -t "" .......~ m < ~ ~! Ol I ~~ ~i q ~ . 0 l' P uqu ~~ H g~~ ~. iii' .. d . . . t t t . . U t .u~n!~ ~~~nIH i= o~~ ... i () < g.' ~ o r , }I. . "a oS.I 1> ii H q ~ :~ nn~ 6~ Hql '~r ~ ~~; ,~ ! p . il .~ ;p~ . m" ...::1.. C;" go ~ . !li~ llHda !e 1. ~ 0 ~nu li~ ~ q m 1 - P 0 Ii ~ ~ ~ '- . III --I EPf?LF'T C....:3 I' t ~ ~ t t . ~[ ) \((~ . ~ .' H - h ~ . ~ j~' . \ ."" \\~ ::~ I I I l.....~ , ~~ H n Ii ~i H n I ~~ ~~ i~ b i6 ~~ i~ ~ ~~ h !l ~~!l h ~~ I Hi "a n ~ H~ ~ ! CHARLESWOOD MARKETPLACE IMrWt__lylhelthlif,...,~" int;\ repri# ..,..t-,.......,wI..,...............,*-=' :IJ dJ RETAil STRIP CENTER ...............OIMIll\atlolll.chIlr"'9~ . 0 ~CT """''''''.....,... m . ;!l ~ I PILOT KNOB ROAD 6: 1951H STREn S....ooI lIllf,jN[SOTA Z fARMINGTON, MINNESOTA ihh ~~~~~~ I 0 , .......... 1R1#JIl1L~SOtl In i PRELIMINARY EXTERIOR RENDERING ".., _ ht'-'''''- .......- ~ e ,,/' ", : , " " I \ " ~!~ \ \ hi Ii Ii s ~i Ii H h h % ~i h 66 ~i U ~ :~ ia ~a --I du ~~! UU .;!~;! H ~;!.< 66 ~6 Ii ~6 66 ~~ B' ~.,~, ~~ i~ ~~ ~~ " . ;-- . " > IIII \ I )> n , z '" z I ...!. 0 1[1 0 g 'ii ~ I i I ! I . ~'I J -u ;p .~ 0'2 l> ;0 -< G .., r o o :<J u r l> Z ".,!,.' " 0'1 , II -- II ~. I, II II I' I I[m~ I I I .t> ~[m~ '~[m~ ~[m~ ~~H~ : ~n~ : ~~~ .0 ~! ~i ! z o z 0) I ; 13',"'" I !W I 4t CHARLESWOOD MARKETPLACE RETAIL STRIP CENTER PILOT KNOB ROAD &. 195TH STREET FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN 8 ""1'" I r I :1 I Cl "' ~ ""'.. I: ~ .: 8'" '.::~":.:':':::'.~ :;'m:".: ;:;::":::'~ .:: I" m. r~t11P'iC';3 ~~J.~;y:~;; ~~:N:So~1Au~;.,cl~d.U\~;g,:;.;~~ ~: ~~:;~' ~~~' .4JC:- \::;!l DES I G N 59001",. oRlAN R JoHNSDN ~ : 5050 .. g .....== ""'""= ""......"" = ,.~.I 0 on "''''''b"' : 10-5-13: B-1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT: {,x;fl8IT F Page 1 of3 10-5-13: B-1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT: (A)Purpose: The B-1 highway business district is intended to provide pockets of convenience type uses along major thoroughfares that are both pedestrian accessible from adjoining neighborhoods and automobile accessible for short trips and through traffic. (B)Bulk And Density Standards: 1. Minimum Standards: Lot area 10,000 square feet Lot width 75 feet Front yard setback 30 feet Side yard setback 10 feet Rear yard setback 10 feet Minimum side and rear yard abutting any residential district Off street parking and access drives 10 feet Public and semipublic buildings 35 feet Recreational, entertainment, commercial and industrial uses 50 feet Height (maximum) 35 feet Maximum lot coverage of all structures 25 percent All standards are minimum requirements unless noted. (C)Uses: 1. Permitted: Animal clinics. Clinics. Clubs. Coffee shops. Commercial recreational uses. Convenience store, without gas. Health clubs. http://66.ll3.l95.234/MN/Farmington/130050000000l3000.htm 9/14/2006 10-5-13: B-1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT: Page 2 of3 Hotels. Motels. Offices. Personal and professional services. Personal health and beauty services. Recreation equipment sales/service/repair. Restaurants, class I, traditional. Retail facilities. Sexually oriented businesses - accessory. 2. Conditional: Auction houses. Auto repair, minor. Auto sales. Car washes. Child daycare center, commercial. Convenience store, with gas. Dental laboratories. Grocery stores. Group daycare centers, commercial. Hospitals. Nursing homes. Outdoor sales. Public buildings. Public utility buildings. Restaurants, class II, fast food, convenience. hrtp://66.ll3 . 1 95.234/MN/Farmington/l 30050000000 l3000.htm 9/14/2006 10-5-13: B-1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT: Page 3 of3 Restaurants, class III, with liquor service. Restaurants, class IV, nonintoxicating. Solar energy systems. Supply yards. Theaters. Wholesale businesses. 3. Accessory: Parking lots. (Ord. 002-469, 2-19-2002) http://66.ll3.195.234/MN/Farmington/13005000000013000.htm 9/14/2006 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT CHARLESWOOD MARKETPLACE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 18th day of September, 2006 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, an application meeting City requirements has been filed seeking preliminary and final plat review and approval of the Charles wood Marketplace plat; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the preliminary and final plat on the 13th of September, 2006, preceded by 10 days' published and mailed notice, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the preliminary and final plat on September 18, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be feasibly served by municipal service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above preliminary and final plat be approved and that the requisite signatures are authorized and directed to be affixed to the final plat with the following conditions: 1. The satisfaction of any engineering and planning comments 2. A restrictive easement must be obtained and recorded, limiting access to the drive in specific circumstances (i.e, no hazardous chemical trucks, etc.) 3. During the well site construction the easternmost north/south drive on the site will have to be closed down in its entirety until the project is completed. 4. The developer shall provide the City with written documentation regarding Mid America Pipeline Company's approval of the construction and development within its gas easement. 5. The preparation and execution of the Development Contract and approval of the construction plans for grading, stormwater and utilities by the Engineering Division. 6. The submittal of a landscape plan acceptable to the City Planner. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 18th day of September, 2006. Mayor Attest to the _ day of September, 2006 City Administrator lod City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Memb~ City Administrator ~ Lee Smick, AICP City Planner FROM: SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance - Text Amendment Section 10-6-1 regarding Residential Swimming Pool Fences DATE: September 18,2006 INTRODUCTION City staff is proposing to amend Sections 10-6-1 (A), 10-6-1 (A) subd. 4, and 10-6-1 (A) subd. 5 concerning fencing requirements for residential swimming pools. Staff is also proposing to include a new definition in Section 10-2-1 concerning "storable swimming pools." DISCUSSION The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance revisions with a 4-0 vote. The Commissioner's did request that the current code language defining a swimming pool at 1-112' water depth be revised to a capacity of 5,000 gallons (14 feet diameter x 4 feet deep) or more. The Commission was concerned that the 1-112' water depth would be interpreted to include water ponds and children's pools. The gallon definition would be more easily interpreted by residents and City staff. The proposed revision of a capacity of 5,000 gallons or more is similar to Lakeville, Rosemount, and Burnsville requirements. Residents have recently asked staff to review the City's Code requirement that swimming pools be enclosed by 5-foot tall fences to prevent uncontrolled access to the pool area. One of the main reasons that staff is proposing to amend the code is to allow individual homeowners to install pools in their yards if they have an existing "yard fence" that is four feet in height. The fencing would still have to comply with the self-latching gate requirement. This would allow residents to utilize their existing fence(s) and still provide the desired security around the pool. In addition, an inground or aboveground pool with its own fence or barrier ("hardwall") of at least 4 feet in height could be allowed in order to enclose the pool without the need for fencing the property. Any such fence would have to have the type of self-latching gate referred to above, and any such "hardwall" barrier (i.e., an aboveground pool with walls at least 4 feet high) would have to have a removable ladder. Staff researched adjacent communities (Lakeville, Apple Valley and Rosemount) and all of them require a minimum of a four (4') foot high barrier/fence surrounding a residential swimming pool. The City, in an attempt to be more consistent with these surrounding communities and alleviate residents' requests to allow 4- foot tall fences, is proposing to amend Section 10-6-1 to allow a fence or barrier of at least 4 feet in height around swimming pools. Additionally, the amendment proposal includes a precise definitional distinction between permanent and storable pools. Permanent pools, inground or aboveground, with a water depth of not less than l' -1/2" shall be considered a swimming pool and a permit approved by the Building Inspections Division is required. A storable pool is nonmetallic, has molded polymeric walls or inflatable fabric walls constructed on or above the ground, and may be readily disassembled for storage and reassembled to its original integrity. Storable pools do not require a fence or barrier provided all means of access (ladders, etc.) are removed and/or the pool is covered when not attended. Storable pools do not require a permit from the building inspections division. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached ordinance amending to Sections 10-6-1 (A), 10-6-1 (A) subd. 4, 10-6-1 (A) subd. 5, and 10-2-1 of the City Code. Respectfully Submitted, ~~ Lee Smick, AICP City Planner CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10-6-1, SECTION 10-6-1 (A) SUBD. 4, ADDING SECTION 10-6-1 (A) SUBD. 5, AND ADDING A DEFINITION TO SECTION 10-2-1 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 10-6-1 (A) of the Farmington City Code is amended as follows (deleted text is stmek, new text is underlined): 10-6-1: RESIDENTIAL SWIMMING POOLS: Any permanent enclosure outdoor pool structure, inground or aboveground, intended for swimming, wading or recreational bathing and having a water surface area exceeding one hundred (100) square feet and a '.'/ater depth of not less than one and one half feet (1 1/2') a capacity of 5.000 gallons or more shall be considered a swimming pool and shall require a permit approved by the building inspections division, wffieh and must meet the following location restrictions: SECTION 2. Section 10-6-1 (A) subd. 4 of the Farmington City Code as amended as follows (deleted text is stmek, new text is underlined): 4. Pool area shall be enclosed by a nonclimbable type safety fence or barrier at least .five foet (5') four feet (4') in height to prevent uncontrolled access to the pool area. The fence shall have a self-closing and self-latching gate with its latch located at least four feet (4') 38" - 42" above the ground level. SECTION 3. Section 10-6-1 (A) adding subd. 5 of the Farmington City Code as amended as follows (deleted text is stmek, new text is underlined): 5. Storable pools do not require a fence or barrier provided all means of access (ladders. etc.) are removed and the pool is covered when not attended. Storable pools do not require a permit from the building inspections division. SECTION 4. Section 10-2-1 ofthe Farmington City Code as amended as follows (new text is underlined): STORABLE SWIMMING POOL: A pool with nonmetallic. molded polymeric walls or inflatable fabric walls constructed on or above the ground and is so constructed that it may be readily disassembled for storage and reassembled to its original integrity. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED this _day of Farmington. , 2006, by the City Council of the City of CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Kevan Soderberg, Mayor ATTEST: By: Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator SEAL By: City Attorney Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,2006. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us /O~ FROM: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator Lee Smick, AICP ,~ City Planner TO: SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance - Text Amendment Section 10-6-10 regarding Reforestation Committee and Tree Trimming Notification DATE: September 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION City staff is proposing to amend Section 10-6-10 (G) Tree Maintenance on City Boulevards, Section 10- 6-10 (H) Tree Topping, and Section 10-6-10 (J) Dead or Diseased Tree Removal on Private Property of the City Code. The amendments propose to replace the tree maintenance division and the city reforestation committee with the natural resources division, which has the appropriate staff to perform maintenance on trees within the city. DISCUSSION The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinances with a 4-0 vote. The attached ordinance shows the proposed revisions to the code sections referred to above. The City does not have a tree maintenance division or an "active" city reforestation committee, so the amendments to the code sections assign the duties to the most knowledgeable staff concerning tree maintenance. The natural resources division currently consists of Jen Collova, the City's Natural Resource Specialist. As the City continues to grow, the "division" will expand, therefore, the "division" is proposed for the amendment rather than the "specialist". Additionally, under Section 10-6-10 (G) of the City Code, staff does not notify residents before trimming boulevard trees. The trees are within the City right-of-way, and notification of trimming by the use of door "hangers" or tags is not performed. In this case, the trimming notification requirements were deleted from the text. In the future, staff will be examining the merits of the city reforestation committee, formally known as the Reforestation Advisory Commission that was established in 1980 in accordance with Department of Agriculture rules and regulations (Title 2, Chapter 9). The Commission is comprised of the City Council, the chair of the Planning Commission and the chair of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and runs concurrently with the primary office held. It is the responsibility of the Commission to study, investigate, counsel and develop and/or update annually, and administer a written plan for the care, preservation, pruning, planting, replanting, removal or disposition of trees and shrubs in parks, along streets and in other public areas. Per the ordinance, the Commission is required to hold an annual meeting during the first calendar quarter of the year. During the 911z year tenure of the current City Planner, the Reforestation Advisory Commission has not held a formal meeting. Once again, staff will review the merits of the Commission and determine whether the Commission should be dissolved and the duties and responsibilities ofthe Commission be assigned to the natural resources division. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the attached ordinance amending Section 10-6-10 (G) Tree Maintenance on City Boulevards, Section 10-6-10 (H) Tree Topping, and Section 10-6-10 (J) Dead or Diseased Tree Removal on Private Property. Respectfully Submitted, ttt:~ Lee Smick, AICP City Planner CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10-6-10 (G), SECTION 10-6-10 (H) AND SECTION 10-6-10 (J) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 10-6-10 (G) ofthe Farmington City Code is amended as follows (deleted text is stmek, new text is underlined): Tree Maintenance on City Boulevards: 1. The boulevard tree maintenance natural resources program is designed to prescribe various levels of maintenance to city trees located within city owned boulevards. (a) Planting Requirements: The city tree maintenance natural resources division will review all planting of trees and shrubs within city boulevards, defined as city owned rights of way. (b) Landscape Plan: Developers of subdivisions must submit a landscape plan to the planning division. The planning division will be responsible for approving appropriate tree plantings within city boulevards. (c) Addition To Plan: Trees planted by residents on the boulevards that are in addition to the tree plan must receive prior approval from the city tree maintenance natural resources division. (d) Trimming Requirements: The parks maintenance natural resources division will be responsible for all trimming of boulevard trees. As these trees are on city property, and are essentially and legally city property, they must be maintained by the city to ensure that they are properly trimmed for structural integrity and disease control measures. (e) Trimming Notification: Prior to trimming boulevard trees, affected residents '""ill be notified of the trimming schedule by the city through the use of door "hangers" or tags. tt1 ill Contact: Residents will need to contact the tree maintenance natural resources division when a boulevard tree needs trimming or inspection. W ill Height Standards: Trimming height standards must maintain a ten foot (10') clearance above any walkway and fourteen feet (14') above the roadway. These requirements provide clearance for walker, snow removal equipment and solid waste vehicles. flit {g} Brush From Pruning: The city will not collect any brush resulting from pruning or removal of trees or brush from private property. ~ (h) Emergency Collection Of Brush: An emergency brush situation would occur when the public safety officer declares one to exist, then and only then will the city collect brush generated by residents on private property, as a one time emergency servIce. SECTION 2. Section 10-6-10 (H) of the Farmington City Code is amended as follows (deleted text is stmek, new text is underlined): Tree Topping: 1. It shall be unlawful as a normal practice for any person to top any street tree, park tree or other tree on public property except as allowed in Section 8-6-1 Oof this code. "Topping" is defined as the severe cutting back of limbs to stubs larger than three inches (3 ") in diameter within the tree's crown to such a degree so as to remove the normal canopy and disfigure the tree. Trees severely damaged by storms or other causes, or certain trees under utility wires or other obstructions where other pruning practices are impractical may be exempted from this section at the determination of the city reforestation advisory committee natural resources division. SECTION 3. Section 10-6-10 (1) of the Farmington City Code is amended as follows (deleted text is stmek, new text is underlined): Dead Or Diseased Tree Removal On Private Property: 1. The city shall have the right to cause the removal of any dead or diseased trees on private property within the city in accordance with title 7, chapter 6 ofthis code when such trees constitute a hazard to life and property, or harbor insects or disease which constitute a potential threat to other trees in the city. The eity reforestation committee natural resources division will notify, in writing, the owners of such trees. Removal shall be done by said owners at their own expense within sixty (60) days after the date of service of notice. In the event of failure of owners to comply with such provisions, the city shall have the authority to remove such trees and charge the cost of removal on the owners' property tax notice. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED this _day of Farmington. , 2006, by the City Council of the City of CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Kevan Soderberg, Mayor ATTEST: By: Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator SEAL By: City Attorney Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,2006. /op City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator(j- FROM: Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Biotechnology and Health Science Industry Zones ["Bioscience Zones"] DATE: September 18,2006 INTRODUCTION The State of Minnesota (through its Department of Employment and Economic Development) is currently accepting applications from cities and other governmental entities that wish to have specified properties designated as "Bioscience Zones." DISCUSSION In 2003, the Minnesota Legislature established the "Biotechnology and Health Science Industry Zone Program" to provide financial incentives (primarily tax exemptions and credits) to qualified applicants who submitted development plans to link higher education research institutions with biotechnology and health sciences industry facilities. The Department of Employment and Economic Development [DEED] subsequently designated one Bioscience Zone with three sub- zones that included all or portions of the cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul and Rochester. A total of 1508 acres were designated, and an initial allocation of $1 million in tax credit funding was distributed to nine companies. However, additional funding was not provided in the 2004-2006 Legislative Sessions. The 2006 Legislature re-opened the process by allowing additional applicants to seek Bioscience Zone designation(s), in order to make themselves potentially eligible for any future funding that might be provided by the Legislature. Applications must be received by October 15, 2006. Zone designations (if any) will be made by December 31, 2006. A Dakota County-based economic development organization (Dakota Future) has been working to coordinate and combine potential applications from several cities in Dakota County. Until very recently, attention was focused exclusively on a potential "biozone corridor" along Highway 52 between St. Paul and Rochester. Because Farmington is not immediately adjacent to Highway 52, it was not initially believed that Farmington would be considered a qualified applicant. However, within the past few days a number of cities have begun devoting additional attention to the portions ofthe new legislation that refer to "non-contiguous sub-zones" and "multiple properties." In short, staff members in those communities (which include cities located some distance from Highway 52, including Burnsville, Lakeville, Farmington and others) are prepared to join the original group of Highway 52 communities (including Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount, Cannon Falls and others) in a collective application that identifies non-contiguous parcels in all of the communities in question that are potentially suitable for bioscience-related industries. The City of Rosemount has agreed to serve as the official applicant for the entire group, and the Dakota County CDA has agreed to serve as the administrator of any local bioscience zone that might be approved by DEED. Any city that desires to participate in the "group application" must adopt a resolution to that effect. A draft of such a resolution has been attached. Dakota Future needs to determine which cities will be involved as quickly as possible, because the Dakota County Board will be considering this matter at its meeting on October 3,2006. Attached hereto is a map that identifies the parcels in Farmington that are (a) zoned appropriately for a bioscience manufacturing or industrial facility and (b) vacant and therefore potentially available for development. Efforts are currently underway to contact the property owners in question to explain the potential benefits of the Biotechnology and Health Science Industry Zone Program. There does not appear to be any "downside" to the Program, nor (especially) any costs that could be incurred by the property owner or the City in connection with the Program. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve proposed Resolution Approving Bioscience Zone Application. . ....... .-- I I 1/ .-- ~ lJ:f L m ~ tJ !.. ", \ ~ ::J M ~ r; "'L V , ~ I \,111 I.., - c:: 0 L u " \~ I: ~ ~ ... I T n~ r U c.. I .......... HI ~ ~ ~ Ifi =r AFr:: - ~ - I i! .J I ~ . J ~ ~ -JD J - r1' In ~, - ~ \1 ~ - r---l - ~.i lEi ., fJ I-' tl J.J a .J III - < II c J~ n II C - - ~ ~ ~n- I I-- I Ir - I 1. PIO.14-o2600-o10-90 9. PIO.14-25828-o10-o2 ~~ ~ Oevney Family Ltd Ptnshp Castle Rock Development Inc. 2. PIO' 14-03600-010-01 10. PIO' 14-o3600-o10~0 (portion of) Il Oevney Family Ltd Ptnshp 11. PIO' 14-03600-010-33 (portion of) 3. PIO' 14-02600-011-67 (portion of) Donald Peterson Family Ltd ptnshp :; /I 111111 10 John Oevney 12. PID# 14-02600-016-82 4. PIO.14-25862-o10-o1 13. PIO' 14-02600-020-66 (portion of) II John Oevney Bernard Murphy Farms LP I 6. PIO.14-26828-o10-o1 Castle Rock Development Inc. 6. PID# 14-25828-020-01 Castle Rock Development Inc. lIllO 7. PIO.14-25828-o30-o2 I I I I I Castle Rock Development Inc. 0 ,aoo 2IllIO - 8. PIO.14-25828-o20-o2 SCALE Castle Rock Development Inc. ICITY OF FARMINGTON POTENTIAL BIO-ZONESI 1 - Municipal Boundary ~ Potential Bfa-Zone Sites I Created on September 12, 2008 . . RESOLUTION NO. R -06 APPROVE APPLICATION FOR A BIOSCIENCE ZONE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 18th day of September 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature found in Minnesota Session Laws 2003, 1 sl Special Session, Chapter 21, Article 2, as a matter of public policy, that biotechnology and the health sciences hold immense promise in improving the quality of our lives, including curing diseases, making our foods safer and more abundant, reducing our dependence on fossil fuels and foreign oil, making better use of Minnesota agriculture products, and growing tens of thousands of new, high-paying jobs; and, WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature Minnesota Session Laws 2006 Regular Session Chapter 276 (S.F. No. 3260) granted to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development the authority, in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of Strategic and Long Range Planning, to designate one or more Biotechnology and Health Sciences Industry Zones; and, WHEREAS, the legislature further found that there are hundreds of discoveries made each year at the University of Minnesota, the Mayo Clinic, and other research institutions that, ifproperly commercialized, could help provide these benefits; and, WHEREAS, the Bioscience Program created in Minnesota Session Laws 2003, 1 sl Special Session, Chapter 21, Article 2 allows for the formation of a Bioscience Zone; and, WHEREAS, an application for Bioscience zone designation in the City of Farmington is being prepared for submission to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development via the Dakota County CDA. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington, at its meeting held on September 18,2006, upon careful consideration and review, approves the specific areas proposed in the application for a Bioscience zone, approves the use of tax exemptions and tax credits within the proposed zone (subject to proper review and approval by the other appropriate taxing authorities within the zones), and encourages the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development to approve the Bioscience Zone Application being submitted by the City of Rosemount as applicant (on behalf of several cities, including the City of Rosemount), with the Dakota County CDA as zone administrator BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Farmington agrees to provide all of the local sales and use tax exemptions provided for under the Bioscience Zone. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 18th day of September 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of 2006. City Administrator SEAL . . 1ST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING, SUITE E200. 332 MINNESOTA STREETe SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1351 USA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 14,2006 TO: Robin Panlener MN State Register FROM: Eugene E. Goddard Bioscience Industry Specialist (651-296-7102) RE: Biotechnology and Health Science Industry Zone (Bioscience Zone) Please put the following information regarding a new DEED program announcement in the next issue of the State Register. Biotechnology and Health Science Industry Zone (Bioscience Zone) The MN Department of Employment and Economic Development will be accepting applications for the Biotechnology and Health Science Industry Zone (Bioscience Zone) Program beginning Tuesday, September 1, 2006 and must be received by close of business on Monday, October 15, 2006. Zone designation will be made prior to December 31, 2006. 2006 MN Legislative Session Chapter 276 authorized DEED to re-open the process for additional communities to apply to have development properties designated as a Bioscience Zone and therefore becoming eligible for any future funding provided by the Legislature for the program, DEED will work in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of Strategic and Long Range Planning, to designate one or more Biotechnology and Health Sciences Industry Zones (Bioscience Zones). Each Zone may not exceed 5,000 acres but may include one or more non-contiguous Sub-zones and multiple properties. The purpose of the Biotechnology and Health Science Industry Zone (Bioscience Zone) Program is to keep or enhance jobs in the area, increase the future tax base, or to expand or create new economic development through the growth of new bioscience businesses and organizations. At this time, the program is not funded and no tax credits are available for distribution to companies. If at some future date the MN Legislature appropriates funds for Bioscience Zone tax credits, newly designated zones and zones designated in 2004 would be eligible to access the tax credits for business development activities. Eligible applicants include statutory or home rule charter cities, counties, towns, school districts, or joint powers boards established under Minnesota Statutes S471.59. Local units of government are strongly encouraged to work together to submit a joint application that links one or more higher education research institution(s) with one or more biotechnology and health sciences industry facility(ies) and that demonstrates the need and likelihood success of the proposed Zone. Application process: One or more Bioscience Zone may be designated in a competitive review process based on statutory criteria demonstrating the need for the zone and likely success of the zone. A. Zone Need Criteria: 1. The extent to which land in proximity to a significant scientific research institution could be developed as a higher and better use for biotechnology and health sciences industry facilities; 2. The amount of property in or near the proposed Zone that is deteriorated or underutilized; and 3. The extent to which property in the area would remain underdeveloped or non-performing due to physical characteristics; B. Zone Success Criteria: 1. A viable link between a higher education/research institution, the biotechnology and/or medical devices business sectors, and one or more units of local government with a development plan; 2. The extent to which the area has substantial real property with adequate infrastructure and energy to support new or expanded development; 3. The strength and viability of the proposed development plan's goals, objectives, and strategies; 4. Whether the development plan is creative and innovative in comparison to other applications; 5. Local public and private commitment to development of a biotechnology and health sciences industry facility or facilities in the proposed zone and the potential cooperation of surrounding communities; 6. Existing resources available to the proposed zone; 7, How the designation of the zone will relate to other economic and community development projects and to regional initiatives or programs; 8. How the regulatory burden will be eased for biotechnology and health sciences industry facilities located in the proposed zone; 9. Proposals to establish and link job creation and job training in the biotechnology and health sciences industry with research/educational institutions; and 10, The extent to which the development is directed at encouraging, and that designation of the zone is likely to result in, the creation of high-paying jobs, C. The Development Plan: Minnesota Statute, 469,331 requires that an application for zone designation contain a development plan. The development plan must include both need and success indicators listed above as well as the following materials: 1, A map(s) of the proposed Zone that indicates: a. The geographic boundaries of the Zone, b. The total area, and c. The present use and conditions generally of the land and structures within those boundaries; d. Property Identification Numbers (PIN) for each parcel within the zone. 2. Evidence of local public and private commitment and support; 3. A description of the methods proposed to increase economic opportunity and expansion, facilitate infrastructure improvement, reduce the local regulatory burden, and identify job-training opportunities; 4. Current social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the proposed Zone and anticipated improvements in education, health, human services, and employment if the Zone is created; 5. A description of anticipated activity in the Zone and each Sub-zone, including, but not limited to, industrial use and industrial site reuse; and 6. A description of the tax exemptions under Minnesota Statutes, 469.336 to be provided to each qualifying business based on a development agreement between the applicant and each qualified business. The development agreement must also state any obligations the qualified business must fulfill in order to be eligible for tax benefits For more information please contact: Gene Goddard at 651-296-7102 or at gene.goddard@state,mn,us. Completed applications must be submitted by the close of business on Monday, October 15,2006 to MN Dep1. of Employment and Economic Development, 1 st National Bank Building, Suite E200, 332 Minnesota Street, 51. Paul, MN 55101-1351. Page 1 of2 Kevin Carroll From: Bill Coleman [bill@dakotafuture,com] Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:24 PM 'Bill Coleman'; skip,nienhaus@ci.burnsville,mn,us; 'Deanna S. Kuennen'; David Olson [Lakeville]; Dave Osberg (External); drogness@dakotacda,state,mn,us; eslettedahl@cityofeagan,com; 'Jenni Faulkner'; jhinzman@ci.hastings,mn,us; jhohenstein@cityofeagan,com; 'Jim Hartshorn'; Jim Danielson; Kevin Carroll; 'Kevin Carroll 2'; 'Kevin McKinnon'; 'Kienberger, Adam'; kim.lindquist@ci.rosemount.mn,us; 'Lovelace, Tom'; 'Mark Ulfers'; 'Shannon Rausch'; 'Tammy Omdal'; Tina Schwanz; tlambrecht@grenergy,com; 'Tom Link'; dking@ci.zumbrota,mn,us; kmiller@cfalls,net; Myron,white@ci.red-wing,mn,us; pieda@pitel,net; areeves@cityofkenyon,com; Lisa. hanni@co.goodhue,mn,us Subject: RE: BIO Zone sites Sent: To: Some clarification. The Dakota County CDA has agreed to be the zone administrator for the BIO-Zone should our application for designation be approved. The City of Rosemount has agreed to be the legal applicant. The applicant must be a general purpose government, like a city, county or joint powers group, so the CDA cannot be the applicant. I have edited the resolution previously sent to put some language that should work, The final sentence of the resolution deals with sales and use taxes and the local government's agreement to give those up. As no cities in Dakota or Goodhue County have a local sales and use tax in place, there is no impact on local revenues, If a sales tax was passed at some time in the future, companies locating in the bio-zone and signing a business subsidy agreement would be exempt from these prospective taxes. You might make special effort to make this clear to your councils. From: Bill Coleman [mailto:bill@dakotafuture.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:09 AM To: 'Bill Coleman'; 'skip.nienhaus@ci.burnsville.mn.us'; 'Deanna S. Kuennen'; 'Ann Carlon'; 'Christine Pigsley'; 'David .Niermann@state.mn.us'; 'dolson@ci.lakeville.mn.us'; 'dosberg@ci.hastings.mn.us'; 'drogness@dakotacda.state.mn.us'; 'eslettedahl@cityofeagan.com'; 'Hoch, Peter'; 'Jenni Faulkner'; 'jennifer@riverheights.com'; 'jhinzman@ci.hastings.mn.us'; 'j hohenstein@cityofeagan.com'; 'Jim Hartshorn'; 'jimd@mendota-heights.com'; 'Joe Klein'; 'Judy Plaster'; 'kcarroll@ciJarmington.mn.us'; 'Ken Stabler'; 'Kent Myhrman'; 'Kevin Carroll 2'; 'Kevin McKinnon'; 'Kienberger, Adam'; 'kim.lindquist@ci.rosemount.mn.us'; 'LaDonna Boyd'; 'Larry Raddatz'; 'Lovelace, Tom'; 'Mark Ulfers'; 'mark.jacobs@co.dakota.mn.us'; 'Mike Yanda'; 'rkurtz@ehlers-inc.com'; 'Samantha DiMaggio'; 'Shannon Rausch'; 'Steve Carrier'; 'Tammy Omdal'; 'Terrell Towers'; 'Tina Schwanz'; 'tlambrecht@grenergy.com'; 'Tom Link'; 'William Lucking' Subject: RE: BIO Zone sites I have had an inquiry about timing of resolution approvals, City council approval of a resolution can come after the county board's approval. However, a city council could not add sites after the county board approval since that would require additional county approval. BC From: Bill Coleman [mailto:bill@dakotafuture.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 20069:09 AM To: skip.nienhaus@ci.burnsville.mn.us; Deanna S. Kuennen; Ann Carlon; Bill Coleman OF; Christine Pigsley; 9/14/2006 Page 2 of2 David. Niermann@state.mn.us; dolson@ci.lakeville.mn.us; dosberg@ci.hastings.mn.us; drogness@dakotacda.state.mn.us; eslettedahl@cityofeagan.com; Hoch, Peter; Jenni Faulkner; jennifer@riverheights.com; jhinzman@ci.hastings.mn.us; jhohenstein@cityofeagan.com; Jim Hartshorn; jimd@mendota-heights.com; Joe Klein; Judy Plaster; kcarroll@ciJarmington.mn.us; Ken Stabler; Kent Myhrman; Kevin Carroll 2; Kevin McKinnon; Kienberger, Adam; kim.lindquist@ci.rosemount.mn.us; LaDonna Boyd; Larry Raddatz; Lovelace, Tom; Mark Ulfers; mark.jacobs@co.dakota.mn.us; Mike Yanda; rkurtz@ehlers-inc.com; Samantha DiMaggio; Shannon Rausch; Steve Carrier; Tammy Omdal; 'Terrell Towers'; Tina Schwanz; tlambrecht@grenergy.com; Tom Link; William Lucking Subject: BIO Zone sites Hello, The County Board will consider the BIO-Zone resolution of 10/3, The resolution provided by DEED includes language that the board is approving a specific list of parcels, so we will need to have the list of your community's parcels prior to that time, Please have your list of parcels to me by 9/28 so they can be approved by the county board. Let me know if you will have any problems meeting this deadline, Thanks, Bill Coleman Dakota Future 651-491-2551 bill@dakotafuture.com www.dakotafuture.com 9/14/2006 //CL SECTION 00 11 13 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FIRST STREET GARAGE PROJECT Farmington, Minnesota City of Farmington will receive single prime sealed bids for First Street Garage Project until 2:00 p.m. local time on October 19,2006 at the Farmington City Hall, 325 Oak Street, Farmington, Minnesota, , at which time and place all bids will be publicly opened and read aloud. Bidding documents, including the Proposal Form, Drawings and Specifications, will be on file at the Offices of the Architect, Wold Architects and Engineers, 305 St. Peter Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102. (651) 227-7773; at the Minneapolis Builders Exchange; Builders Exchange at St. Paul; McGraw Hill ConstructionIDodge Plan Center; Reed Construction; iSqFt Plan Room (Brooklyn Center); and from PlanWell at www.ersdigital.com. Albert Lea Builders Exchange; Austin Builders Exchange; Mankato Builders Exchange; Builders Exchange of Rochester; St. Cloud Builders Exchange; Mid Minnesota Builders Exchange (Willmar, MN); Northwest Regional Builders Exchange (Eau Claire); LaCrosse Builders Exchange. This project includes: A 5,200 square foot New Storage Garage consisting of earthwork, asphalt paving, site concrete, utilities, fencing, building concrete, precast concrete wall panels, masonry, structural steel, carpentry, roofing, sealants, doors, frames, hardware, overhead doors, painting, plumbing, HV AC, fire protection, temperature controls and electrical. Engineering Repro Systems, 2007 E, 24th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404 (612) 722-2303, facsimile (612) 722-3745, will provide complete sets of the Bidding Documents to prospective bidders and subcontractors. The copies will be available about September 19, 2006, Both a deposit check in the amount of $25.00 and a non-refundable check in the amount of $125.00 made out to "City of Farmington" for each set ordered are required or Bidding Documents may be ordered via the internet at www.ersdigital.com and clicking on the PlanWell icon, then the Public Plan Room icon, select First Street Garage Project. The following information must accompany the deposit: Company name, mailing address, street address, phone and facsimile numbers and type of bidder (i,e, General, Mechanical or Electrical Subcontractor to General, or other). A refund of $125.00 will be sent to prime contractors who submit a bid to the Owner and subcontractors for each set (including addenda) returned to Engineering Repro Systems Imaging in good condition within ten (10) calendar days of the award date, subject to the conditions of AlA Document A701. Returns will not be given if the plans are returned to the Architect's Office. Make proposals on the bid forms supplied in the Project Manual. No oral, telegraphic or telephonic proposals or modifications will be considered. Submit with each bid, a certified check or acceptable bidder's bond payable to City of Farmington in an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the total bid. The successful bidder will be required to furnish satisfactory Labor and Material Payment Bond, and Performance Bond, Bids may not be withdrawn within thirty (30) days after the scheduled time of opening bids, without the consent of the Owner. The Owner reserves the right to accept any bid or to reject any or all bids, or parts of such bids, and waive informalities or irregularities in bidding. The Owner requires Substantial Completion of the project on or before April 19, 2007 City Council CITY OF FARMINGTON No. 062048 001113-1 Advertisement For Bids //.6 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, City Council and City AdministratoG Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director TO: SUBJECT: 1. 2. 3. Orderly Annexation Agreement with Castle Rock Township Joint Resolution - Annexation of Olson Property (Castle Rock Township) Joint Resolution - Annexation of Mock Property (Castle Rock Township) DATE: September 18, 2006 DISCUSSION The latest version (attached) ofa proposed Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City of Farmington and Castle Rock Township was approved by the Castle Rock Town Board at its meeting on September 13,2006. The two separate Joint Resolutions (attached) needed to finalize the annexation of the Olson and Mock properties were also approved by the Castle Rock Town Board at the same meeting. All three of the aforementioned documents are now ready for City Council consideration and approval (if they are acceptable). If approved, the documents will then be submitted to the Municipal Boundary Adjustments Unit. ACTION REQUESTED 1. Motion to approve the attached Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City of Farmington and Castle Rock Township. 2. Motion to approve the Joint Resolution regarding the annexation of the Olson property. 3. Motion to approve the Joint Resolution regarding the annexation of the Mock property. Re" lly Submi Lt&:fj1 Community De p~~ cc: Castle Rock Township Bryce Olson Terry and Linda Mock R109-06 T"T1\o.T'T' TYUC"T T T'T'T"1\o.T /"TlTYUnT 'T ^ 1\o.Tl'I.TTI'\T ^ 'T'T"1\o.T ^ roTYUTI'l. A'TI1\o.T'T' J'-..I1.1'" J. l.'-1.X)'-..ILU J.1.'-..Il"'/'-..IUUJ..:,ULJ. .L\...l...l...J..:,Ar\..J.1.'-..Il"l nUUDD1V1.Dl"l J. BETWEEN CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP AND THE CITY OF FARMINGTON T~IS-..?RD~RLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT is entered into this L~PJ_ of ~___, 2006 by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP (hereinafter referred to as the "Township"). WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues 414.0325 authorizes townships and municipalities to provide for the orderly annexation of unincorporated areas that are in need of orderly annexation; and WHEREAS, the City and Township agree that there is a public need for the coordinated, efficient and cost-effective extension of sewer and water services to promote economic growth and development, and provide for the efficient delivery of desired or required public services; and WHEREAS, the property described in attached Exhibit "A" (hereinafter referred to as the "Annexation Area") is about to become urban or suburban in nature and the City is capable of providing sewer, water, and other public services within a reasonable time; and WHEREAS, the extension of sewer, water, and other public services can only be provided in prioritized phases if the process and timing of service requirements are clearly identified and jointly agreed upon in advance of the City's capital planning, commitment, and expenditure; and WHEREAS, the establishment of a process of orderly annexation of said lands may be of benefit to the residents and owners of said lands, and permit the City to extend municipal services in a planned and efficient manner; and WHEREAS, the City and Township desire to accomplish the orderly annexation of the Annexation Area and the extension of municipal services in a mutually acceptable and beneficial manner without the need for a hearing before the Municipal Boundary Adjustments Unit [MBAU] of the Office of Administrative Hearings, or its successor, and with the purpose of avoiding annexation disputes, enter into this joint resolution for orderly annexation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.0325, subd. 1; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Farmington and Castle Rock Township that the two parties enter into this Joint Resolution Orderly Annexation Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") and agree to the following terms: Acreage and Locaiion 1. The attached map entitled "Exhibit A - Annexation Area" shall be the framework for annexation from 2006 through 2016 (inclusive). The map constitutes the Annexation Area, and denotes areas from which annexation may occur under this agreement. It is not necessary that all of the land constituting the Annexation Area be annexed within the time period set forth in this agreement. 2. The lands included within the 2006 through 2016 Annexation Area are designated for future urban development within the City. The Township shall oppose any efforts to include any of the lands within the Annexation Area into any governmental jurisdiction other than the City. Annexation Area 3. The City shall have the right to annex land within the Annexation Area during the period from the date of this Agreement though December 31, 2016. The annexation pace shall be consistent with the requirements and standards set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, and zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. 4. Annexation will be limited to property that is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City. 5. All annexations shall be subject to the prevailing Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and subdivision regulations of the City. 6. The Township will not file any objection with the MBAU concerning the City's annexation of any land within the Annexation Area described above, so long as the annexation complies with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Comprehensive Plannin!:!: 7. The City will revise its Comprehensive Plan to address properties located within the Annexation Area. 8. (a) Except as provided in Paragraph 8 (b) or 8 (c), the Planning Commission and/or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation for any property located within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way that initial Comprehensive Plan designation, without providing the Township with reasonable advance notice of (and a 2 ..~_ _.._1.1. _........_.~..,~_~_ __..._~__,~~ __.\ _..nu._1. __1___~,_,_ ,u_-1,.c,__~,_._ _L____,____ reaSUllaOle UJ:JJ:JUnUlllLY LU CUllllllellL Ull) allY :SUCll aUUJ:JllUll, lllUUlllcallUll, cllallge U1 alteration. (b) With regard to any proposed industrial or commercial use of property, the Planning Commission and/or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation for any property located within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way that initial Comprehensive Plan designation, without the consent of the Township Board, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld. (c) With regard to any proposed medium to high density residential, industrial, or commercial use that is proposed to be constructed within 150' of the west property line of any Castle Rock Township residence that is located adjacent to Berring Avenue, the Planning Commission and/or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation for any property located within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way that initial Comprehensive Plan designation, without the consent of the Township Board, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld. (d) With regard to any future development proposed to be constructed along the west property line of any Castle Rock Township residence that is located adjacent to Berring Avenue, the City will not obtain or require any permanent easements or rights-of- way from the owners of the Berring Avenue properties in question. Plannine and Land Use Control 9. Pursuant to MN Statute 414.0325, MN Statute 471.59, and Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes, the parties agree that the City shall have the authority to exercise planning, land use, zoning and subdivision authority within the Annexation Area. Prior to the actual annexation of a parcel of property located within the Annexation Area, the City's exercise of such authority shall be limited to adopting a Comprehensive Plan designation for that parcel, which will not affect the parcels land use unless and until the annexation is complete. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the City and the Township, the zoning and use(s) of a parcel located within the Annexation Area, and the construction or modification of structures located thereon, shall be controlled by the Township's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, regulations and procedures until the annexation of that parcel has been completed. 10. Intentionally omitted and reserved for future use. 3 Annexation Process 11. Annexations within the Annexation Area shall occur only if the owners of the properties located within the Annexation Area petition for annexation. 12. If the City intends to annex a parcel of property within the Annexation Area, the City shall, within 14 days of receipt of a petition to annex property within the Annexation Area, submit to the Township the following: (a) The legal description and a map of the property proposed to be annexed; (b) A description of the proposed use of said property, if known by the City, and with the express understanding that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any such proposed use; Upon receipt of submittals set forth above, the Township will be provided 30 days to comment on the proposed annexation. 13. During the term of this Agreement, petitions for the annexation of areas located outside of the Annexation Area shall not be accepted, processed or approved by the City without the express written consent of the Castle Rock Board of Supervisors. This provision shall remain in effect through December 31, 2016 even if this Agreement terminates earlier than December 31, 2016 pursuant to Paragraph 27 hereof. Road Maintenance and Improvement; Transportation Planning; Road and Bridge Account 14. Road Maintenance Prior to Annexation. The Township shall continue its normal maintenance of existing Township roads, bridges, drainage facilities, and street signage for any property located within the Annexation Area until that property is annexed by the City. 15. Toint Maintenance/Improvement Expenses. The City and Township agree to develop a joint policy for sharing the cost of maintaining and improving Township roads that are adjacent to any property that is annexed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 16. Toint Transportation Planning. The City and the Township will work in cooperation with Dakota County, MnDOT and developers to assure that any new development within the Annexation Area properly addresses: 4 (a) the transportation needs of the project; (b) projected impacts on City and/or Township roads, especially those that are likely to result in the need to make improvements or upgrades due to increased traffic and/or different types of usages; and (c) compliance with the transportation system set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 17. Road and Bridge Account. The Township shall create a new road and bridge account that is separate from its existing road and bridge account. Payments of the type referred to in Paragraph 19 below shall be deposited into the new account. The Township may transfer up to 7.5% of each such deposit into its general revenue fund. Funds in the new road and bridge account shall be used exclusively for the following purposes: (a) Maintenance: The funds in question may be applied to roadway maintenance costs on Roadway Segments A, B, Cor D, as identified on the attached Exhibit B, and on Berring Avenue and 230th Street. (b) Improvements: The funds in question may be applied to the cost(s) of constructing, reconstructing, paving or otherwise improving Roadway Segments A, B, Cor D, as identified on the attached Exhibit B, and 230th Street. The Township's engineer shall discuss any proposed or anticipated expenditure in excess of $1000 with the City's Public Works Director prior to the authorization or commencement of the work in question. Any funds that remain in the account upon the expiration of this Agreement shall be returned to the City unless the parties have mutually agreed in writing, prior to said expiration, that those funds may be retained by the Township for other costs attributable to any additional development that occurs within an area subject to any separate Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and the Township. Statutory Sharill!:! of Tax Revenues 18. Property tax revenue generated by annexed properties shall be allocated between the City and the Township on the following basis: (a) Ash Street Orderly Annexation Area: For any past or future annexations involving properties located within the Ash Street Orderly Annexation Area, property tax 5 revenues related to cornmercial or industrial properties (only) will be shared by the City and the Township pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. Sec 414.035, subd. 12, as set forth below: Subd. 12. Property taxes. When a municipality annexes land under subdivision 2, clause (2), (3), or (4), property taxes payable on the annexed land shall continue to be paid to the affected town or towns for the year in which the annexation becomes effective. If the annexation becomes effective on or before August 1 of a levy year, the municipality may levy on the annexed area beginning with that same levy year. If the annexation becomes effective after August 1 of a levy year, the town may continue to levy on the annexed area for that levy year, and the municipality may not levy on the annexed area until the following levy year. In the first year following the year when the municipality could first levy on the annexed area under this subdivision, and thereafter, property taxes on the annexed land shall be paid to the municipality. In the first year following the year the municipality could first levy on the annexed area, the municipality shall make a cash payment to the affected town or towns in an amount equal to 90 percent of the property taxes distributed to the town in regard to the annexed area in the last year the property taxes from the annexed area were payable to the town; in the second year, an amount equal to 70 percent; in the third year, an amount equal to 50 percent; in the fourth year, an amount equal to 30 percent; and in the fifth year, an amount equal to ten percent. The municipality and the affected township may agree to a different payment. Any past payments due to the Township pursuant to this Paragraph 18(a) shall be calculated and paid as if this provision had been in effect as of the date of annexation. (b) Future Annexations: For any future annexations that are completed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, property tax revenues related to properties located within the 2006-2016 Annexation Area shall be shared pursuant to Paragraph 19 of this Agreement. Tax Rebates to Castle Rock Township 19. Payments to Township. Upon annexation of any land per this Agreement, the Township shall not be entitled to receive tax revenue rebates from the City until such time as the property is developed or redeveloped. When development or redevelopment occurs, and the improved property is assessed in a manner that reflects the value of the completed development improvements, the Township shall begin to receive tax revenue rebates. The tax rebate received by the Township on any given developed or redeveloped residential parcel shall be equal to 50% of the amount of the City's share of the total property taxes paid on that parcel in the first tax year that reflects the full value of the completed initial improvements. Improvements shall be considered "completed" when the City issues a 6 ,,_ ..~'L' __ ~_ _L ~____"__.__n \......erUlleaLe 01 veeu valley. The payments due to the Township pursuant to this Agreement will be made within 60 days of the City's receipt of the property tax revenue(s) in question, or within 60 days of receipt by the City of the annual accounting from the Township, whichever is later. 20. The Township will provide an annual accounting of the use of funds from the Road and Bridge Account referred to herein. If the City wishes to challenge the accounting, it may do so at its own expense. If there is an error in the Township's accounting the error will be corrected by the proper jurisdiction. If the error is in the Township's favor, the expense the City incurred to audit the Township's accounting will be paid through a reduction of funds owed to the Township pursuant to this Agreement. Dispute Resolution and Amendment 21. Disputes concerning this agreement shall be resolved as follows: (a) NEGOTIATION. When a disagreement over interpretation of any provision of this agreement occurs, the City and Township must meet at least once, at a mutually convenient time and place, to attempt to resolve the dispute through negotiation. (b) MEDIATION. If the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, claim or counterclaim, or are unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable interpretation of any provision of this agreement, the parties may mutually agree in writing to seek relief by submitting their respective grievances to non-binding mediation. (c) ADJUDICATION. When the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, claim or counterclaim, or are unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable interpretation of any provisions of this agreement, or are unable to agree to submit their respective grievances to non-binding mediation, then either party may seek relief through initiation of an action in a court of competent jurisdiction. In addition to the remedies provided for in this agreement and any other available remedies at law or equity, in the case of a violation, default or breach of any provision of this agreement, the non-violating, non-defaulting, non-breaching party may bring an action for specific performance to compel the performance of this agreement in accordance with its terms. If a court action is required, the court may reimburse the prevailing party for its reasonable attorney's fees and costs. 7 r-.. 1~ 1............ veneral 1 erms ana rrOVlSlOns 22. This agreement may not be modified, amended or altered except upon the written joint resolution of the City and Township, duly executed and adopted by the City Council and Township Board of Supervisors, and filed with the MBAU. Either party to this agreement may request an amendment. Requests for amendments will first be considered by each jurisdiction's Planning Commission. Their recommendations shall be forwarded to the Township Board and the City Council. The City and Township agree to meet jointly on an annual basis to consider and discuss (a) the usage of Road and Bridge Account funds during the preceding twelve months and (b) possible modifications to this orderly Annexation Agreement. 23. The terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this agreement, including the present and all future attachments, shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties, superseding all prior agreements and negotiations regarding the Annexation Area (with the exception of any jointly approved roadway maintenance agreements between the City and the Township). There are no understandings, agreements or assumptions other than the written terms of this agreement. 24. This agreement shall be binding upon and benefit the respective successors and assigns of the City and Township. Specifically, this agreement is binding upon the governmental entity that survives or is created by any action on the part of the Township to merge, consolidate, detach, annex, reorganize or incorporate. 25. This agreement is made pursuant to, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event any provision of this agreement is determined or adjudged to be unconstitutional, invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 26. Upon the filing of this Agreement and resolution with the MBAU, the parties will not request any alteration of the boundaries of the land constituting the Annexation Area, or any change in the annexation of land not provided for in this agreement. The MBAU may review and comment on the annexation resolution, but may not otherwise consider the resolution or alter the Annexation Area boundaries. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of an annexation resolution adopted by the City, which complies with this Agreement, the MBAU must order the annexation of the area described in the annexation resolution in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. 8 r"T' . .. l' '"' 1 1 A .. _ A .- "-- - -" .. 1. ermlnatlOn or uroenv finnexanon figreemeIH 27. This agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2016, or the date upon which all permitted annexation of land in the Annexation Area has been completed, whichever occurs sooner. Notwithstanding the termination of this agreement, the following provisions shall remain binding and enforceable after the termination of the agreement for all properties annexed under the terms of this agreement: (a) Paragraph 17 - Relating to use of tax rebate funds. Any funds in the Road and Bridge Account (Paragraph 17 hereof) shall remain available to the Township for the purposes referred to in Paragraph 17 until the later of: 1. December 31, 2016, or 2. Two (s) years after the City Council's approval of the last annexation of property located within the Annexation Area that occurs prior to December 31, 2016. (b) Paragraph 19 - Relating to tax rebates; and (c) Paragraph 20 - Relating to annual accounting. Binding Agreement. Director's Review 28. No alteration of the areas set forth herein for orderly annexation, or their boundaries is appropriate. The director may review and comment, but not alter the boundaries. 29. This Orderly Annexation Agreement designates certain areas as eligible for orderly annexation, and provides the conditions for the annexation of those areas. The parties agree that no consideration by the director is necessary, and that therefore the director may review, and comment, but shall, within thirty (30) days of the submission of a petition for annexation in conformity with this Agreement, order annexation consistent with the terms of this Orderly Annexation Agreement, and Resolutions submitted pursuant thereto. 30. This Agreement is a binding contract, and provides the exclusive procedures by which the unincorporated property identified in the Agreement may be annexed to the City. The City shall not annex property within the Annexation Area by any other procedure. 9 ADOPTED BY THE CASTLE ROCK TO\V1'~SHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE _L!l.!:A DAY OF.~~___, 2006. ATTESTED TO: By: C~.L.LLiI~~--- Its: Board Chair By: ~~t~__~___________ Its: Town Clerk ADOPTED BY THE FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL ON THE ______________, 2006. DAY OF ATTESTED TO: By: By: _______________, 11ayor ________________ City Administrator 10 . ~~L, ': " ,I ~, ~:,:-:~::,~.-;-, I .'. r..........'. J:r b.\~:.:::j ~ :</ :::::: :'.:: :.':' ~.'( ~) saJ;JvS9'9L II!---' /~ ,:':::":::"'-.:"j.:l ~OSll:IJ.3:d / ':-:" ..' .I01VNOO I z f /,<::<:H:{:~.:.::: :(:7 L 0 Y (.;" .... . .' 'Y 1 t ~ ~ ~ ~.:::-::.it((i\.::.i; ..: ~~ [ ~ \,,:';;:~:::':"':'::::l u, . Vi 'cOo' . . .' .', \ !~::::'..;.." I = I 1--1 \\?;~.\::-::.~./:F~'~~. ~ '-'. ,j i-- \-:.:: :.....:.: : ::':::':" .::':..:-\ ~!Hg~ ~~I~" ~~: 1 }i/.:(:(.::}/::U.:I\..h1 ~aa '- ~ 'ill ~ = (,r:..:..,::...::.:.:::::.:.i:.:::-: ..\ V:: ~ ~glllrmT~ ~~ ~1~""~ itm: ~ ~!U.:...::.:.:.:: :~<. ':~:':: ':':: \::,:. ~ Eilirl IITTTT TTl ~ ;_1 ~ ~ /::.:X:::." ~.::~'. ':.:: .::: M EEEEEEHE ~~ 0: = ~a5 :....:::: = \::', ~ ~ ~ ~~ '- I 1 H' -/.~./;::..;:.<:~:j \-<::. ~ 1 ILLJ~EHEl~ -w II I It- II ".. .~ (. ~~ till II I I I I I I ITDJI8 Ff 1\ K-l1~\bIm " . i..::.:.-;-: ...::, ~.<: \.. ~ \...:: .. ....! .:c:".: .; Dt,rfT~H~fEDJJDJIIIII]:33:t I ~ rU.~.~..':~"::~:': ::'-..:':.\::.\ ""~"~ ~ [[j]] l-r h II I I 11 g 1,;;'::':,:.:.:':'::: :.:. ~:: :.= ::'~ ';.: i 0 .:g llllllllll I DO -.J ~ u !1.ci ::'.:.: : \: -.: .:.: '::'::' './. ~ ~ - 0 I1I1IIIII1 OJJID:::J ~ ~t:"::.':."'. :..:.......:~~ _~ ~ t; ~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::.;l~~ I1III1 TIT 1 onrn ITIIIIJ IllIIJ ~ ")' . '. :.':: . '.:': : :' .:::'.: :' ~.:.::.: .' '. : :.: :::7: 11111111 I ITIill OJIII][IIIITI 1-4 . '.' . '.':: : -:. '.' .: : :.' :'-::. '. .: .: .':-'. ~l1Jl1 ~ -, oL'vV /.~::.::'.::i:::.~:'X'::::";<.:.~':~g.'....:.. ~{)V liMOJ V.LO)lVa I ...-::::: ..'.<:::rn.... : : :j' :::'. mP'11 -.,.... _~I/.:.::..::..:.:~.~:::.:. ~ ~ ~ ~U?~ :.~:.::::..'i:~.,;::::.:~.::.:::.~~::.:.:.~.:.~:.:.:. I ;:::::; .... -+-. . -;..: . . :... .~. . . . . .' . r::;.... ,.' ....~...y ~ ~ '\ I -( .: :,Gr :..:., . . ':"i g f ~ ~j ~M \ ( l :::.~..i:f;jfjJ;.(;.::...:: :....:.: ~ ~'~ Fl -E~ '85 (:J I \~ ---C;.).~~.:...:.:..:.:.,:..'... 000 E .;0; 0 = 0 ~ 0 ~" .... ~ ~ ~ H i i~l \ \ ~. : : : .'::' ~ : :s 6' a ~~ ~ ~5 n \' 1 n DD~DD \ ~ "~--1 i::'',..j _, 1 t'I"6!. :-<OSlI:IJ.:ld 1 t1lVKOtI . . EXHIBIT A '" 0", -'0 "-- "" --..... "'''' ]] "'> e " v... ~g. ~~ . ~ t . ;; ~ F < ~ I000o\ = I000o\ 8 ~+~ 3: .- --- -~--:.-~~~~'-'-""-=----"""""""'--"'--=-"''''~~~~''-''''':~~ ~....",........----- r------ n '" o :5 :.:3 (0 ~ V? e ~ ~ ~ :::N U -, t--.::C .;- ~ ;!' -Nt" "v~1 ..j l.f') C' i *'.~ x I I II :1 ] i!! \ "" () ~ CO U - I 0.0. ,./ ro ro ~ I ~ III ~~ i <: i?i f-< ,./ ~ ~ ~ / I ~ _ :_ J' _ ~ __ ___..--,....._ -~, l, _ .' -.....-..tC.. -::'AV:::1',1.i'1-_::' J I o I l____ HAV AtnlailV ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =:r:: >< ~ Rt\. V tIllaNNV ~~ O,....J ~~ <t::...... i=OU ~ ~ ~ ~ o g:j . V ONlItlA'1V z 0>-, ::::8<t:: ::J~ ~l i~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ o C!l +-' a.> a.> u.. ~ EXHIBIT B RII0-06 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK CITY OF FARMINGTON ''\ IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK AND THE CITY OF FARMINGTON, DESIGNATING AN UNINCORPORATED AREA AS IN NEED OF ORDERLY ANNEXATION AND CONFERRING JURISDICTION OVER SAID AREA TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT OFFICE, PURSUANT TO M.S. ~414.0325 JOINT RESOLUTION (Olson Property) WHEREAS, by previous joint resolution and agreement entered into between the City and Township in September of2006, attached hereto as Exhibit A, the properties legally described below were included in a designated orderly annexation area but were not made subject to immediate annexation, and; WHEREAS, the owners of property legally described on the attached Exhibit Band depicted on the attached Exhibit C have petitioned the City for annexation to the City pursuant to the terms of the Orderly Annexation Agreement, and; WHEREAS, all provisions of the Orderly Annexation Agreement (OAA) have been satisfied and the Township consents to the annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Township of Castle Rock and the City of Farmington jointly agree to the following: 1. The Township and City have determined that the area of the property involved in this annexation is approximately 161.83 acres and the population of the area is currently two (2). 2. That the purpose of the annexation of the property involved in this annexation is to facilitate the development of the property to urban densities and to provide urban services, including city sewer and water services. 3. That in order to facilitate the construction and financing of the improvements necessary for development that is urban or suburban in character and the efficient delivery of governmental services, the property in question should be immediately annexed to and made part of the City of Farmington. 4. The City and Township agree that upon execution of this Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation all planning, official controls, and governmental services for the annexed area shall become the responsibility of the City. 5. The City and TO\vnship also agree that the provisions of Minn, Stat. 99414.035 authorizing differential taxation for the annexed property will not be applied in this proceeding, and that the terms specified in the aforementioned OAA for reimbursement to the Township shall apply for this parcel to be annexed. 6. Upon approval by the respective governing bodies of the City and the Township, this joint resolution and agreement shall confer jurisdiction upon the Director of the Office of Strategic and Long-range Planning (or his or her successor designee responsible for administering Minnesota Statutes Chapter 414) so as to immediately annex the lands described in the attached Exhibit B in accordance with the terms of this joint resolution and agreement without need for any subsequent resolution(s) of the parties. 7. The City and the Township mutually state that no alteration by the director to the OAA boundaries, as illustrated on Exhibit C and described in Exhibit B, is appropriate or permitted. 8. Having designated the area illustrated on Exhibit C and described in Exhibit Bas in need of orderly annexation, and having provided for all of the conditions of its annexation within this document, the parties to this agreement agree that no consideration by the director is necessary. The director may review and comment but shall within thirty (30) days order the annexation in accordance with the terms of this Resolution. Approved and A~L this LYi1day of . -c.2006. Approved and Adopted this _ day of , 2006. TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK CITY OF FARMINGTON BY: ;e[~L//4~dtl~ BY: Its Town Board Chair Its Mayor AND 1J1IVL~ ~ AND Its Town Board Clerk Its City Administrator EXHIBIT A Copy of September 2006 Orderly Annexation Agreement between Castle Rock and Farmington EXl!!B!T B LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 113, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota, subject to public road right-of-ways. Containing 161.83 acres. W~]t9 .~ - - - -~ r~ ~;';tl =r~ ill 0B 0Th. c \\TIfrr]fu--~Eht 1tIl~ lL A I F1 D]}~ =- ~ __IT Titrr _~~ ,h ~ [ffi] ~~ ~~itJ ag I~ [ID]] ~ ,= d~D iJ][M] :l 8JJIf] II :::: ~ ~ ~ :J: Co/) Eg ~ ~[ ,~~ ~~~ ~a z =- ~[;] I~;; t~ ~E ggg ~g s: ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ - = = W ~ ~ I ~ a ~C~ -II :J JI= I l~ n [8tfITI~ e . xx x xxx X 'X y'X Q)_ I x ~ f- ~I \' 10 fCRT CR1- x )C >< x )C >< )C)C ~ __ \CRT ' x ~ ~ .... r x ~ ==:[ ~ f-1 ." ." ''''''''It'll'll'''''' U .... PROPOSED ANNEXA liON l1.. , I I I I I I I I I'" t:. )C AREA - :J: IIII I J~ J 1 L ~s .A .A .A .A .A .A ... Co/) )C)( z 1-1 I I I u1:-- - M~ ~~ =- ~ ' !-- e .... -L\ ~- 1-1 r- L.-.- ~ ~ ~ 1--1 T i- I I ~\.!'-.A U IT- e 1--t1T -'-- '=1_ I I 1 1 'I I I I'" II 1 ~ "'-1 ,/.-,- -"'l 0'" " _7\: 1IJ 1+f:1:= IL I~ 1- I- -I- ...J II-I- -l- I I ~"-< .... , I- I- -H x ~ Co/) 1- -- I C[ -- :-1--:- x ~ 1 11- x U Tl AST E1 ~tl< towNSHIP [CRTJ I ! OLSON PETITION FOR ANNEXATION I MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY ~ OLSON PROPERTY EXHIBIT C RIII-06 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK CITY OF FARMINGTON IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK AND THE CITY OF FARMINGTON, DESIGNATING AN UNINCORPORATED AREA AS IN NEED OF ORDERLY ANNEXATION AND CONFERRING JURISDICTION OVER SAID AREA TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT OFFICE, PURSUANT TO M.S. ~414.0325 JOINT RESOLUTION (Mock Property) WHEREAS, by previous joint resolution and agreement entered into between the City and Township in September of 2006, attached hereto as Exhibit A, the properties legally described below were included in a designated orderly annexation area but were not made subj ect to immediate annexation, and; WHEREAS, the owners of property legally described on the attached Exhibit Band depicted on the attached Exhibit C have petitioned the City for annexation to the City pursuant to the terms of the Orderly Annexation Agreement, and; WHEREAS, all provisions of the Orderly Annexation Agreement (OAA) have been satisfied and the Township consents to the annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Township of Castle Rock and the City of Farmington jointly agree to the following: 1. The Township and City have determined that the area of the property involved in this annexation is approximately 2.5 acres and the population ofthe area is currently two (2). 2. That the purpose ofthe annexation of the property involved in this annexation is to facilitate the development of the property to urban densities and to provide urban ,services, including city sewer and water services. 3. That in order to facilitate the construction and financing of the improvements necessary for development that is urban or suburban in character and the efficient delivery of governmental services, the property in question should be immediately annexed to and made part of the City of Farmington. 4. The City and Township agree that upon execution of this Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation all planning, official controls, and governmental services for the annexed area shall become the responsibility of the City. 5. The City and Township also agree that the provisions of Minn. Stat. S4l4.035 authorizing differential taxation for the annexed property will not be applied in this proceeding, and that the terms specified in the aforementioned OAA for reimbursement to the Township shall apply for this parcel to be annexed. 6. Upon approval by the respective governing bodies of the City and the Township, this joint resolution and agreement shall confer jurisdiction upon the Director of the Office of Strategic and Long-range Planning (or his or her successor designee responsible for administering Minnesota Statutes Chapter 414) so as to immediately annex the lands described in the attached Exhibit B in accordance with the terms of this joint resolution and agreement without need for any subsequent resolution(s) of the parties. 7. The City and the Township mutually state that no alteration by the director to the OAA boundaries, as illustrated on Exhibit C and described in Exhibit B, is appropriate or permitted. 8. Having designated the area illustrated on Exhibit C and described in Exhibit Bas in need of orderly annexation, and having provided for all of the conditions of its annexation within this document, the parties to this agreement agree that no consideration by the director is necessary. The director may review and comment but shall within thirty (30) days order the annexation in accordance with the terms of this Resolution. Approved and "i.l;ted this l2!iL day or~2006. Approved and Adopted this _ day of , 2006. TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK BY: j4.,-uLe' /l//~~A Its Town Board Chair CITY OF FARMINGTON BY: Its Mayor AND 1J~1 -' Muv AND Its Town Board Clerk Its City Administrator EXHIBIT A Copy of September 2006 Orderly Annexation Agreement between Castle Rock and Farmington EXl!IBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South 346.26 feet ofthe Southeast l;4 of the Northwest l;4 of Section Five (5), Township One Hundred Thirteen (113), Range Nineteen (19), except the East 1,016.62 feet thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. , ~1Iii.--- , ' --' TH 50 ~ ~ fJf liJ I /'" .--l -- - ~ - ~' - ~ 1: - (- ~ I ~ ~J y I I - - I (: r- \/ ~ Pc -M rC- :::I: I- ~EE- f-- ----1 1 t.> - ;;;; I II=\~ ;;; I ~ ~III 1<1 - I I I f'-' l --'~~ g ~ .treet ;- co I I I ~ I 3: 1-- - - c: - - co MI-- .~ -5-<,-= =-X ~~ -:::I: _ 1-1, - 225th Street I I I L ! , MOCK PETITION FOR ANNEXATION - CITY BOUNDARY ~ MOCK PROPERTY EXHIBIT C Values Statement Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional and cost-effective manner. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Ethics and Integrity We believe that ethics and integrity are the foundation blocks of public trust and confidence and that all meaningful relationships are built on these values. Open and Honest Communication We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. Cooperation and Teamwork We believe that the public is best served when departments and employees work cooperatively as a team rather than at cross purposes. Visionary Leadership and Planning We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be visionary and to plan for the future. Positive Relations with the Community We believe that positive relations with the community and public we serve leads to positive, involved, and active citizens. Professionalism We believe that continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism and are committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and the development of our employees. /~ R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/2006 10:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - COlfHCIL MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 9/5/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount ADAMS HECK, MIKE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 29,03 29,03 AFFINITY PLUS FEDERAL CREDIT U EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CREDIT UNION PAYABLE 2,125,00 2,125.00 AFLAC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,200.00 3,200.00 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES INC STREET MAINTENANCE STREET MATERIALS 1,217,95 1,217,95 ALCORN BEVERAGE CO, INC, DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 21,607,30 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 19,653,42 41,260,72 ALLSTATE SALES & LEASING CORP, SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 437.88 437.88 AMSTERDAM PRINTING AND LITHO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET MN SALES TAX DUE 14,59- ELECTIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 238,98 224.39 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC FIRE SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 27,16 27.16 ANDERSENINC,EARLF STREET MAINTENANCE SIGNS & STRIPPING MATERIALS 106,09 MEADOW CREEK 3RD OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,463,00 1,569,09 ARCTIC GLACIER ICE DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 558.40 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 985,50 1,543,90 ASPEN MILLS FIRE SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 252.10 252,10 ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 939,11 939.11 B & 0 V\IOOD RECYCLING NATURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45.00 ~ 45,00 ~ R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/200610:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 2 9/5/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount BADGER METER INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 852,00 852,00 BATCHELDER, JIM RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 312,50 312,50 BELLBOY CORPORATION DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 542,75 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 62,63 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 848,16 1,453,54 BOERBOOM, ROB INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 35,76 35,76 BROCK, JOSEPH SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 16,84 16,84 BUGBEE'S LOCKSMITH BUILDING MAl NT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,50 4,50 BURNSVILLE, CITY OF PATROL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,099,44 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 549,73 1,649,17 CANNON VALLEY PRINTING RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 1,871,77 1,871,77 CAP AGENCY SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 6,00 6,00 CATCO PARTS SERVICE STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 129,92 FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 204.95 334,87 CINTAS -754 POLICE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 211,30 STREET MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 142,49 PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 298.81 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 28,00 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 79,23 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 142,49 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 99,10 '~ R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/200610:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 3 9/5/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 421,58 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 99,10 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 142.49 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19,80 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 142,49 'A/HER IITILITY EXPENSE PRO~~SSIONAI ~~RVIr.~~ 9910 FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 291,98 FLEET OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 95,28 2,313,24 CMI MAILING & MARKETING SVS RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 2,382,08 2,382,08 CNH CAPITAL STREET MAINTENANCE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 393,42 393.42 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 693,20 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 864,60 1,557,80 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 19,151.00 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 20,362,54 39,513,54 COMMERCIAL ASP HAL T CO STREET MAINTENANCE STREET MATERIALS 675,14 675,14 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 30,00 SPRUCE ST EXTENSION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,081.59 1,111,59 COMPASS POINT TRAINING PATROL SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 275,00 275,00 CULLIGAN ULTRAPURE INDUSTRIES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 20,60 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 13.90 34.50 D R HORTON ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 8,000,00 8,000,00 DAKOTA COUNTY LICENSE CENTER CAPITAL ACQUISITION VEHICLES 2,043,31 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/200610:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 4 9/5/2006 - 9/1712006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 2,043,31 DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER/AUDITO HRA CAPITAL PROJECTS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 3,743,90 3,743,90 DAKOTA FENCE OF MN INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 43,23 43,23 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO DOWNTOINN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,923,90 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,060,80 3,984,70 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT CENTER PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 2,730,00 2,730,00 DICK'S SANITATION INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 22,461,14 22,461,14 DISCOUNT STEEL INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 511,20 511,20 DISTAD, RANDY RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 46,73 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 12.46 59,19 DRAKE,PAUL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 126,00 126,00 DYNAMEX WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 35,66 35,66 ECM PUBLISHERS INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE ADVERTISING 104,00 104,00 ECO EDUCATION SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 619,58 619,58 ERICKSON CONSTRUCTION OF LAKEV STREET MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,205,00 14,205,00 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 300,00 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 900,00 RSSCKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/200610:1S:41 Council Check Summary Page - S 9/S/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 1,200,00 FARMINGTON BAKERY INC SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 11,10 11,10 FARMINGTON EMPLOYEE CLUE! EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FIIND EMPLOYEE CLlIS R7 RQ 87,89 FARMINGTON PRINTING INC BUILDING INSPECTIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 10,6S ANNUAL SEALCOATING PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,91 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OUTSIDE PRINTING 12S,67 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE OUTSIDE PRINTING 146,97 298,20 FEDERAL EXPRESS FLAGSTAFF AVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,99 21,99 FERRELL GAS PRODUCTS CO ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE FUEL 140,48 140.48 FLAHERTY,BARBARA GENERAL FUND REVENUES MASSAGE LICENSE SO,OO SO,OO FRADGLEY, KIMBERLEY E RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 120,00 120,00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF AME DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP TELEPHONE 1,48 1,48 GRIGGS COOPER & CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,438,87 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 7,896,09 10,334,96 HANCO CORPORATION PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 203,71 203,71 HAYNES, TRICIA SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 400,00 400,00 HEAL THPARTNERS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,828,40 6,828,40 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/200610:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 6 9/5/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount HERLOFSKY JR, PETER J ADMINISTRATION CELLULAR PHONES 25,00 ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 52.40 77.40 HERMEL WHOLESALE SV'v1MMING POOL OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD 5,23 5,23 HOHENSTEINS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 631,75 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,262.45 1,894,20 HOLST, GARY RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 88,00 88,00 HOMES BY CHASE ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000,00 2,000,00 HYDRO-VAC INC ELM ST RECONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 525,25 525,25 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND ICMA PAYABLE 4,586,92 4,586,92 IMAGES ON METAL INC RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 254,70 254,70 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC NATURAL RESOURCES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 120,00 120,00 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FIRE SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 195,00 195,00 INTERSTATE BATTERY TWIN CITIES PATROL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 149,05 149,05 INTOXIMETERS POLICE FORFEITURES SALES OF ASSETS 481,91 481.91 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, CITY OF RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 653.44 653,44 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COM PAN DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 9,352,56 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/200610:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 7 9/5/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,533,65 10,886,21 KEYLAND HOMES ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000,00 2,000,00 KROOG, RACHAEL SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 250,00 250,00 LANDSCAPE DEPOT PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 31,94 31,94 LARSON, TIM PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 57,99 57,99 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND LELS DUES PAYABLE 259,00 259,00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES - P HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 40,00 40,00 LEXISNEXIS INVESTIGATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150,00 150,00 LONE OAK COMPANIES INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE POSTAGE 300,00 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS POSTAGE 300,00 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS POSTAGE 300,00 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE POSTAGE 300,00 1,200,00 LUEDERS, JEFF RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 176,00 176,00 MANLEY BROTHERS ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000,00 2,000,00 MARK VII DISTRIBUTORS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 4,887,07 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 8,069,27 12,956,34 MAXIMUM VOLTAGE BUILDING INSPECTIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 65,98 65,98 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/200610:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 8 9/5/2006 - 9/1712006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount MCNEARNEY HOMES, ROBERT ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000,00 2,000,00 MEDICA EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 50,225,14 50,225,14 METRO PEST MANAGEMENT FIRE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 57,26 57,26 METROCALL INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 1,88 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 1,88 3,76 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE SAC CHARGE RETAINER 15,345,00 15,345,00 MINNESOTA AFSCME COUNCIL #5 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND AFSCME UNION DUES PAYABLE 697,63 697,63 MINNESOTA AG GROUP INC PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 6,92 6,92 MINNESOTA COACHES INC SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 525,00 525,00 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 49,46 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 95,37 144,83 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARKAS PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 75,00 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 236,00 311,00 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO STREET MAINTENANCE STREET MATERIALS 149,10 149.10 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN 1,894,87 1,894,87 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIAT FIRE SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 600,00 600,00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/2006 10:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 9 9/5/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 1,314,24 1,314.24 MN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOU 195TH ST EXTENSION SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 1,000.00 1,00000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND GARNISHMENT PAYABLE 299,64 299,64 MN MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOC I HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32,50 32,50 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA LIFE INS PAYABLE 66,00 66,00 MOODY COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 175,00 175,00 MUZAK - NORTH CENTRAL DOVVNTOVVN LIQUOR REV & EXP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 56,98 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 60,23 117,21 MVTL LABORATORIES INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 71,50 71,50 NELSON, MATTHEWR ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 3,00 3,00 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION CELLULAR PHONES 170,22 HUMAN RESOURCES CELLULAR PHONES 156,18 BUILDING INSPECTIONS CELLULAR PHONES 176,02 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CELLULAR PHONES 49,12 PATROL SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 906.69 FIRE SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 225,79 ENGINEERING SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 333.78 PARK MAINTENANCE CELLULAR PHONES 303.30 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 100.35 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 170.22 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS CELLULAR PHONES 28,21 DOVVNTOVVN LIQUOR REV & EXP CELLULAR PHONES 45,92 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 144,28 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/200610:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 10 9/5/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS CELLULAR PHONES 417,50 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 144,29 FLEET OPERATIONS CELLULAR PHONES 62,12 3,433,99 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC PATROL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 119,24 119,24 OFFICEMAX - A BOISE COMPANY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 936,98 936,98 ORKIN EXTERMINATING BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 87,73 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19,69 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19,69 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,94 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19,69 150,74 PAUSTIS WINE CO, DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 262,50 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,271,47 1,533,97 PHILLIPS IMNE AND SPIRITS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,696,51 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,617,08 5,313,59 PINE BEND LANDFILL INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17,052,80 17,052,80 POLFUS IMPLEMENT INC. NATURAL RESOURCES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 45,55 PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 5,22 50,77 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 6,285,54 6,285,54 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA PAYABLE 11,261,64 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA 13,768,67 25,030,31 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,194,17 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,702,21 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/200610:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 11 9/5/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 2,896,38 RADEMACHER,ZACH FIRE SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 26,61 26,61 REDEPENNING, LINDA SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS POOl Anr.AISSIONS l' nn 12,00 RIGID HITCH INC PARK MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 21,80 21,80 RIVER VALLEY HOME CARE INC SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ADVERTISING 25,00 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS REVENUE ADVERTISING 25,00 STORM WATER UTILITY REVENUE ADVERTISING 25,00 WATER UTILITY REVENUES ADVERTISING 25,00 100,00 ROC INC FIRE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 216,20 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,883,13 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 858,39 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214,60 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214,60 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 42,92 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214,60 3,644,44 ROSEMOUNT SAW & TOOL NATURAL RESOURCES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 18,00 18,00 RUTHERFORD,GARY EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 855,00 855,00 SCHORI, BEN A SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 109,96 109.96 SIGNATURE LIGHTING INC EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 9,664,88 9,664,88 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 736,64 736,64 SPRINT PATROL SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 490,95 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/2006 10:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 12 9/5/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 490,95 SUMMIT CUSTOM LANDSCAPE INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,365,00 3,365,00 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING INC CITY HALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,750,00 FIRST STREET GARAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,250,00 9,000,00 SWEDIN, ROSEMARY GENERAL ACCOUNTING MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 16,02 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 9,06 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 9,06 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 9,06 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 9,05 52,25 SWlTZER,DALE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 93.68 93,68 T C CONSTRUCTION ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000,00 2,000,00 TIGER CORPORATION STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 306,06 306,06 TKDAINC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,098,85 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,098,86 2,197,71 TOLLEFSON, CARL CSAH 31 PROJECT LAND 61,250,00 61,250,00 TRI-COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY DO'MlTO'Ml LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 15,50 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 89,20 104,70 TULLAR, JOE FIRE SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 922,25 922,25 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE FIRE SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 16,73 FIRE SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 17,72 34.45 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 9/14/2006 10:15:41 Council Check Summary Page - 13 9/5/2006 - 9/17/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE COMMUNICATIONS POSTAGE 2,000,00 2,000,00 VERIZON VV1RELESS FIRE SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 15.40 1" 40 VIDEOTRONIX INC POLICE ADMINISTRATION EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 993,15 993,15 SODERBERG WACKER, MARILYN PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 80,00 FOGARTY 80,00 MCKNIGHT WEIDEMA INC, S,R, HILLDEE RECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 725,829,64 PRITZLAFF 725,829,64 WILSON VV1NE MERCHANTS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 40,66 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 620.47 661,13 VV1NGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE TIRES 85,69 85,69 ZEE SERVICE COMPANY BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 65,31 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 166,99 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 27,86 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 27.86 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,57 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 27,86 321.45 Report Totals 1,189,971,02