The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08.21.06 Council Packet City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, M:\ 55024 Mission Statement Through tearmvork and cooperation, the Citv o/Farmington provides quality services thm preserve our proud past and foster a promisingfitture, AGENDA PRE-CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 21, 2006 6:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGE~DA 3. CITIZEl\' COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIE\V OF AGENDA 5. STAFF COM"IENTS 6. ADJ 0 URN PI/BLlC fNFORMA T/ON STA TFMLVT ~'ouncif workshops arc conducted as an informaf work session, all discussions shall hI' considercdfact-Jinding, hypothetical and unofficial critical thinking exercises, ',',hich do not rej7ect an olJicial public position, Council work session outcomes should not be constmed by the attending public and/or reporting II/edia as the articulation of a formal City policy position, Only official Council action normally taken at a regularly scheduled Council meeting shollld be cOllSidered as afiJrmal expression of the Cin' '.I' position on any given matter. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 21, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS a) Introduce New Employee - Parks and Recreation b) Minnesota Energy Resources 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) a) Response to Mr. Jerry Ristow - Engineering 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (8/7/06 Regular) (8/15/06 Special) b) July 2006 Financial Report - Finance c) Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation d) Appointment Recommendation Public Works - Human Resources e) Approve Joint Powers Agreement Regarding Fiber Connectivity - Human Resources f) Adopt Resolution - Appoint Responsible Authority for Law Enforcement Under Data Practices - Human Resources g) Appoint Interim Director Emergency Management - Police h) Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License St. Michael's Church- Administration i) Adopt Resolutions - Acquire Tax Forfeited Properties - Engineering j) Approve Bills k) Spruce Street Lighting - Engineering (Supplemental) 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Approve Wine License and Intoxicating Malt Liquor License - Ted's Pizza- Administration b) Approve Grading CUP ISD 192 - Community Development 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT Action Taken Introduced Information Received Information Received Approved Information Received Information Received Approved Approved R89-06 Brian Lindquist Approved R90-06; R91-06 Approved R92-06 Approved Approved 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Adopt Resolution - Economic Growth Committee - Administration b) Adopt Resolution - ISD 192 Preliminary and Final Plat - Community Development c) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Winkler Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning - Community Development d) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Graham Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning - Community Development e) Elm Street Open House Comments - Engineering f) TH3119Sth Street Intersection Control - Funding - Engineering g) Draft 2007 Budget - Administration/Finance 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Approve City Hall Project - Administration b) GIS Presentation - Community Development c) Adopt Resolution - Seed/Genstar AUAR Update - Community Development d) Adopt Resolution - Approve New High School EA W - Community Development e) Castle Rock Orderly Annexation Agreement Update - Community Development 12. NEW BUSINESS a) Amend Ordinance - Special Assessment Deferrals - Finance 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN R93-06 R94-06 R95-06 Ord 006-559 R96-06 Ord 006-560 Include Streetscape Authorized Information Received Approved Information Received R97-06 R98-06 Consensus to Approve Ord 006-561 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 21, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENDATIONS a) Introduce New Employee - Parks and Recreation b) Minnesota Energy Resources .1. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) a) Response to Mr. Jerry Ristow - Engineering 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (8/7/06 Regular) (8/15/06 Special) b) July 2006 Financial Report - Finance c) Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation d) Appointment Recommendation Public Works - Human Resources e) Approve Joint Powers Agreement Regarding Fiber Connectivity - Human Resources f) Adopt Resolution - Appoint Responsible Authority for Law Enforcement Under Data Practices - Human Resources g) Appoint Interim Director Emergency Management - Police h) Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License St. Michael's Church- Administration i) Adopt Resolutions - Acquire Tax Forfeited Properties - Engineering j) Approve Bills 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Approve Wine License and Intoxicating Malt Liquor License - Ted's Pizza- Administration b) Approve Grading CUP ISD 192 - Community Development 9. AWARDOFCONTRACT a) Spruce Street Lighting - Engineering (Supplemental) Action Taken Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Adopt Resolution - Economic Growth Committee - Administration b) Adopt Resolution - ISD 192 Preliminary and Final Plat - Community Development c) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Winkler Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning - Community Development d) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Graham Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning - Community Development e) Elm Street Open House Comments - Engineering f) TH3/19Sth Street Intersection Control - Funding - Engineering g) Draft 2007 Budget - Administration/Finance 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Approve City Hall Project - Administration b) GIS Presentation - Community Development c) Adopt Resolution - Seed/Genstar AUAR Update - Community Development d) Adopt Resolution - Approve New High School EA W - Community Development e) Castle Rock Orderly Annexation Agreement Update - Community Development 12. NEWBUSINESS a) Amend Ordinance - Special Assessment Deferrals - Finance 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 56 .;UINNESOT4 ~1'j!~fY Minnesota Energy Resources (a subsidiary of WPS Resources Corporation) 2665 145th Street West Box 455 Rosemount, MN 55068-0455 July 12,2006 Mayor Kevan Soderberg Farmington, MN To the Honorable Mayor Kevan Soderberg; I would like to confirm our meeting with you and the Council on Monday, August 21 at 7:00pm at Farmington City Hall. At that time I would like to introduce our new company President Chuck Cloninger and provide some information about Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation. It is our pleasure to serve your city with natural gas and our goal is complete customer satisfaction. Please let us know if you have questions or concerns and we'd be happy to discuss them at your convenience. In towns, cities, and crossroads across our service area, we are living our commitment to community, a commitment made possible by the people ofWPS Resources Corporation. Each and every day, we're connecting businesses, schools, and non-profit organizations with the resources of our company and the WPS Resources Foundation for greater local good. From arts and culture to education, from community affairs to health and human services, from environment to economic stimulus, our commitments are making a critical difference in the places we call home. We look forward to meeting you. Sincerely, /1 6;~1 , /' - / /;;;//ft:((//.~ Ann Carlon, APR External Relations Manager 651-322-8916 www.minnesotaenergyresources.com 1 ez-, COUNCIL MINUTES PRE-MEETING AUGUST 7, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 6:30 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Lee Smick, City Planner; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant 2. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaffto approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA Councilmember McKnight noted the proposed Council Workshop date will not work for him. It was agreed to have the workshop on August 15,2006 at 7:00 p.m. Councilmember McKnight noted on the request for capital outlay for parks and recreation, the equipment is over budget. Parks and Recreation Director Distad noted there are future projects where they are anticipating being under budget. Councilmember Wilson asked about the Orderly Annexation Agreement with Castle Rock. Staff had provided the same document in a different presentation. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked about Daisy Knoll Park and what is scheduled to be in the park. Parks and Recreation Director Distad replied the third draft of the park master plan is not the same as the second draft. Council will be seeing the master plans in September. Mayor Soderberg noted the Tae Kwon Do studio won 12 medals in the Junior Olympics held in Atlanta. They will be present prior to the Council Meeting for a picture with Council. Council Minutes (Pre-Meeting) August 7, 2006 Page 2 5. STAFF COMMENTS City Administrator Herlofsky stated the Fire Department has had an agreement to provide services at the Dakota County Fair. Finance Director Roland prepared a continuation of the contract at an appropriate rate to provide services this year. This item was added to the Consent Agenda. City Engineer Mann stated the payment to Friedges should be pulled off the list of bills for further review. 6. ADJOURN MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto adjourn at 6:39 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, ~/Y7~ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR August 7, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Soderberg called for a moment of silence for Jacque Devney. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Soderberg led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Audience: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Lee Smick, City Planner; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Bryce Olson, Tami Zakoski, Chad Collignon, Dustin Hanson, Mark Kragness, Russ Zellmer, Cheryl Wade, Lois Lotze, Nancy Norton, Randy Oswald, Michelle Franke, Julie Blomster, C. Rosenthal, USA Tae Kwon Do, Wendy Steffen, Colin Garvey, Gary Pipho, Arlen Lamb, Brad Meeks, Mike Pierce 4. APPROVE AGENDA City Administrator Herlofsky added item 7u) Fire Service Agreement for Dakota County Fair. City Engineer Mann pulled the payment for Friedges Landscaping from the list of bills. Mayor Soderberg noted the date of the Council Workshop was changed to August 15,2006 at 7:00 p.m. He added a proclamation to item 5c) Acknowledge Retirement Police Department. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS a) MRPA Award of Excellence Presentation The MRP A presented an Award of Excellence to the Parks and Recreation Department and the Dakota Dreamcatcher's 4H Club for the chair project for the Rambling River Center. Council Minutes (Regular) August 7,2006 Page 2 b) Northern Dakota County Chamber Ms. Ruthe Batulis, President of the Northern Dakota County Chamber, Mr. Chad Collignon of the EDA and Mr. Mark Kragness, the Farmington Area Business Council Chair spoke regarding establishing a collaboration between the City and the area business community regarding economic development and community issues. They presented the process and rationale for development of a draft resolution for a proposed Economic Growth Committee. They propose the EGC be made up of representatives from the private sector businesses, schools, townships, Chamber and the City. They would like this committee to serve as an advisory body to the Council. City Administrator Herlofsky provided the Council with a draft showing the relationship between the EGC, the EDA and the Council. He recommended staff review the resolution to make sure it works consistently with the proposed relationship which shows the EGC reporting to the EDA. The resolution will be brought back to the August 21, 2006 Council meeting. The Council unanimously supported the resolution. c) Acknowledge Retirement Police Department Sgt. Brian Lindquist stated for the past 17 years the City of Farmington has known one Police Chief. Chief Siebenaler is responsible for hiring 20 members of a 22-person department. This is his legacy to the department. He asked that August 11, 2006, Chief Siebenaler's last day with the City, be declared as Chief Dan Siebenaler Day for the City of Farmington. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Fogarty to approve the proclamation. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Soderberg presented Police Chief Siebenaler with a plaque recognizing his 27 years of dedicated service. d) Citizen's Police Academy Councilmember Pritzlaff acknowledged the Police Department for their service and for the information provided in the Citizen's Police Academy. e) USA Tae Kwon Do Group This group of students was recognized by the Council for receiving 12 medals in the Junior Olympics held in Atlanta. 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS a) Response to Mr. Jerry Ristow - Engineering Mr. Ristow received his response by fax today. He suggested sending responses sooner than Thursday prior to a Council Meeting. At the last meeting he spoke regarding the mill and overlay project and all Councilmembers responded to him except for Councilmember Wilson. He was disappointed when he got home and noticed Councilmember Wilson played a political role and responded under Council Minutes (Regular) August 7, 2006 Page 3 Council Roundtable where Mr. Ristow felt it should not have been done. He felt Councilmember Wilson should have answered to the people that were in attendance. He received answers to his questions from City Engineer Mann. He noted the mill and overlay project was accepted by Council in December 2004. He asked City Administrator Herlofsky for information on the pavement management policy and received it. There was a rating on the feasibility report and in the policy which states 0-35 indicates a failing system, 35-55 indicates poor to moderate, 55-100 the street is in good condition. The document on the mill and overlay project shows Heritage Way and Sunnyside Drive are at a 62 and a 63. This leaves him to question what is going on. Centennial Circle is an 80, Lower Heritage Way is also an 80. Either the pavement management policy is faulty or he is reading it wrong, but it raises questions for him and goes back to his original theory of is this money being spent wisely by replacing curb to curb and back to back and some approaches to driveways. Mr. Ristow stated he totally disagrees with the answer to one of his questions and the rest are an Engineer's way of saying things he would disagree with, but he is not an Engineer. Mr. Ristow said that City Engineer Mann states in Centennial Circle that the storm water drains to a swale at the end of the circle and that is why they are replacing all the curbing and the pavement itself. That has nothing to do with pavement management, that is a storm water issue and road issue. Instead of assessing those residents for this type of a project, it should be been taken care of through the storm water utility fund or the road and bridge fund. From reading the information he received, he found nothing that said they would totally tear a road apart or tear continuous curb out. It was fixing curb that had a light sound to it. It brings him to the big question, are our tax dollars being spent wisely. He noted Council stated they are not professionals, but he expects them to do some research and be independent thinkers and think wisely for their tax dollars. In mid-July there was a problem with tearing out the curb and some damages occurred. His driveway and some others had some damage. He called City Administrator Herlofsky to come out to see the damage to his driveway. He stated City Administrator Herlofsky called him and said we will see what happens at the end. That was unacceptable to Mr. Ristow. Mr. Ristow contacted the cement contractor and he agreed to cut the approach and pour it. Mr. Ristow showed some examples of how driveway approaches were repaired. Some go from nothing to 2 ft of blacktop to I ft of concrete to a quarter section if no one complains and some are getting more. He felt someone is getting some special treatment. If the City is going to start fixing approaches to driveways, they should stay within the right-of-way. One picture showed 5 ft was replaced, another was 6 ft, and another was 8 ft, which happened to be Mayor Soderberg's driveway. He noted that driveway was in tough shape because he took pictures before and after. Mr. Ristow stated if we are going to fix someone's driveway, we need to do it fairly. Mayor Soderberg stated he told the contractor's not to do anything special or over and above. He had no conversation with the contractors about how much to do or what to do. If Engineering wants to address that, they can. Mr. Ristow stated it Council Minutes (Regular) August 7,2006 Page 4 looks skeptical with some people getting hardly 1 ft and some getting 8 ft. Mr. Ristow stated what they should do now that a precedent has been set, there are a lot of approaches and this is City property. Maybe everyone's driveway should have 8 ft. replaced. Let's play fair. Are we playing fair or what is going on here? Mayor Soderberg stated he has not heard a new question other than what Mr. Ristow has repeated for the last three meetings as to whether this Council thinks the tax money is being spent properly. Council answered that question after the first time. Mr. Ristow replied are we going to get consistency? Are we going to get new curbs all the way like Centennial Circle? Is this a mill and overlay project or is it a piece work project like was originally said. Mayor Soderberg stated the City Engineer answered the question. Mr. Ristow stated he did not, he was asking the Mayor. Mayor Soderberg repeated the City Engineer answered the question. 7. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approved Council Minutes (7/17/06 Regular) b) Received Information June 2006 Financial Report - Finance c) Acknowledged Retirement Police Department - Human Resources d) Approved Appointment Recommendation Parks and Recreation - Human Resources e) Acknowledged Resignation Finance - Human Resources f) Adopted RESOLUTION R81-06 Appointing Election Judges - Administration g) Received Information Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation h) Adopted RESOLUTION R82-06 Accepting Donation Pollution Prevention Day - Parks and Recreation Mayor Soderberg thanked Dakota Electric for their donation. i) Adopted RESOLUTION R83-06 Accepting Donation Rambling River Center- Parks and Recreation j) Adopted RESOLUTION R84-06 Scheduling Assessment Hearing - 2006 Seal Coat Project - Engineering k) Adopted RESOLUTION R85-06 Scheduling Assessment Hearing - 2006 Mill and Overlay Project - Engineering I) Adopted RESOLUTION R86-06 Scheduling Assessment Hearing - Hill Dee Reconstruction Project - Engineering m) Adopted RESOLUTION R87-06 Authorizing Advertisement of Bids 208th Street Project - Engineering n) Received Information School and Conference - Police 0) Approved Appointment Recommendation Interim Police Chief - Administration p) Adopted RESOLUTION R88-06 Identifying Voting Member for Dakota Communications Center - Police q) Received Information 2006 State of Dakota County - Community Development r) Set August 15,2006 Council Workshop - Administration s) Received Information Cataract Relief Association Pension Request - Administration Council Minutes (Regular) August 7,2006 Page 5 t) Approved Bills u) Approved Fire Department Contract with Dakota County Fair Board - Administration APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Approve Grading Conditional Use Permit - Christensen Property- Community Development Jay and Patricia Christensen have applied for a conditional use permit to allow the school district's contractors to utilize a portion of their property for staging the grading project. They are proposing six construction trailers, poles for electricity, etc. The hill will be pushed west and east to flatten the site and then they will apply class five. This is a 4.5 acre site. Conditions include: 1. The applicant must obtain final City approval of the grading operation and the rough grading plan from the City Engineer. 2. The applicant must pay any applicable fees, provide adequate surety in an amount and form approved by the Director of Public Works and comply with any other reasonable conditions. 3. All excavation activities must be consistent with plans submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works. Grading can begin as soon as approval from the Council and the City Engineer is received. No work can be done on the high school site include putting sand piles on the site until the EA W has been completed and the Met Council has ruled. The first possibility for grading on the high school site is August 24, 2006. The EA W will be brought to Council on August 21, 2006 for review and approval. Mr. Doug Bonar stated the site will be restored to its earlier condition. The only thing that could change that would be the slope elevations needed to improve Flagstaff Avenue. Councilmember Pritzlaffstated he was not in favor of making a private person's property better than it was before with tax payer dollars. At the last meeting he asked how many thousands of yards of dirt would be hauled in. From the borrow pit it was 60,000 cubic yards. Mr. Dave Peterson, of Mortenson, stated there would be several hundred thousands of yards hauled to the site. It was discussed that there would be 800,000 - 900,000 yards of grading on the school site itself and that has gone up nearly 1,000 yards offill to be graded. He received a phone call from the Donnelly's that they had not been contacted regarding any grading adjacent to their property and a difference in slope of 10 - 15 ft. He had been told that the school district was considering buying 5 acres from the Donnelly's. Councilmember Pritzlafflearned the Donnelly's have not been approached about this. We have an outrageous amount of fill either moved in or hauled around on this site, which was the best site topography-wise to either buying more land. The Donnelly's are not willing to sell. Council Minutes (Regular) August 7,2006 Page 6 MOTION by Fogarty, second by Wilson to close the public hearing. Voting for: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Wilson. Voting against: Pritzlaff. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Fogarty second by McKnight to approve the Conditional Use Permit for grading on the Christensen property. Voting for: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Wilson. Voting against: Pritzlaff. MOTION CARRIED. 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Accept Results Community Survey - Administration CJ Olson Market Research conducted a telephone survey of 500 residents. The objective was to gain valuable feedback, identify issues and concerns faced by the City and its residents, to determine what residents like most about living in Farmington, what serious issues face the community, gather opinions on public safety issues, parks and recreation, determine what types of new or additional businesses residents would like to see in Farmington and demographic information. Mr. Wayne Ramaker, ofCJ Olson presented the results of the survey. 90% of the people surveyed rated the quality oflife in Farmington as good or excellent. b) Consider Parks and Recreation Referendum Options - Parks and Recreation Staff presented four options for Council consideration for a possible referendum in 2006. The options include indoor recreational facilities, outdoor recreational facilities and park land acquisition. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended option 1 which includes a four field youth baseball complex at the Newland Community site, five field soccer complex at the Newland Community site, concession, restroom and storage building for baseball and soccer complex, playground equipment for baseball and soccer complex, picnic shelter for baseball and soccer complex, two full basketball courts, two sand volleyball courts, two outdoor hockey rinks, finish trail connections (boardwalks and Lake Julia waterway pedestrian bridge crossing), purchase 25 acres of land for future expansion of adult softball field complex, purchase 5 acres of land for Middle Creek Park expansion, and finish development of Middle Creek Park. The cost of this option is $7,946,000. City Administrator Herlofsky recommended the following: 1. That the consideration of a referendum be tabled until the fall of 2007. 2. That following the receipt of the final plat from Newland for the Fairhill development, that the Parks Department initiate a planning process for the land dedicated for park purposes. 3. The request made by the Parks and Recreation Commission related to a variety of improvements would be best suited for the Newland property especially based on its size. Council Minutes (Regular) August 7,2006 Page 7 Mayor Soderberg agreed we had a need for these facilities but a referendum at this time would be premature. Councilmember McKnight noted the City is not in a position to afford this now. Councilmember Wilson also agreed to table this and look at it again in 2007 for a 2008 referendum. If there is a referendum we have to be cognizant of informing the public. 90 days before an election is not enough time to inform the public. He agreed we should wait to have the land in our possession. Councilmember Fogarty disagreed. She understood the financial impacts, but felt it is up to the residents to decide if they want to afford these parks. These types of issues have been tabled for ten years. The school district provides 80% of all the recreation facilities in the City. Usually it is 50%. We need to improve our parks. To put this off until 2008, there will also be an operating levy coming to the voters in 2008. She does not want people to have to choose between their schools and their parks. Councilmember Pritzlaff felt the City cannot afford this. MOTION by Fogarty to approve Option 1. Motion died for lack of a second. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to table the referendum issue until the Fall of2007 including points 2 and 3 recommended by City Administrator Herlofsky. Voting for: Soderberg, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson. Voting against: Fogarty. MOTION CARRIED. c) Consider One Year Extension of Recycling Contract - Parks and Recreation The current recycling contract with Dick's Sanitation expires at the end of2006. Staff requested permission to negotiate a one year extension to do a more thorough review of the contract before going out for a five year contract, to provide an opportunity to further analyze the solid waste operations, allow for the recycling schedule to be published in the new City calendar in 2007, and residents are satisfied with the current service. MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaffto extend the contract with Dick's Sanitation for one year. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Approve Castle Rock Township Orderly Annexation Agreement- Community Development The Castle Rock Town Board made some revisions to the version ofthe Orderly Annexation Agreement that was approved by the City Council. Therefore, the agreement was brought back to Council for approval with these revisions. Councilmember McKnight noted the agreement approved by the township added two roads for maintenance and one road was added for improvements. This is a concern because they have discussed the amount of money that would be shared and whether that would be enough to cover the initial roads. So we do not think we have enough money, but potentially we are expanding the number of roads to maintain or improve. The administrative fee negotiated from 5% to 7.5% is now Council Minutes (Regular) August 7, 2006 Page 8 15% in this agreement. That was a deciding factor for him. This document has been worked on during many meetings with the Castle Rock Discussion Group. Councilmember McKnight was also concerned that in 15 minutes a new document was handed out, discussed and approved at a Town Board meeting. He will not support this version. Councilmember Pritzlaff also would not support the agreement for the same reasons. Mr. Russ Zelmer, Castle Rock Town Board Chair, stated the agreement was discussed at length by the Town Board. The agreement approved by the Council was a generous offer. Some township residents see it as giving their property away. In order to ease those feelings, changes were made to the agreement. This is what the Town Board feels is fairer to them. Mr. Zelmer stated these are minor changes and would hate to see it go away after all the time spent on this. He realized talks can still continue. He was not sure how much more the Town Board is willing to give. Mr. Gary Pipho, Castle Rock Board of Supervisors, stated the 15% is not an increase or a change in the dollars allocated by the City. It allows more of the funds to come back to Castle Rock over a ten year period. They added a road to the maintenance along Berring Avenue because if there is any additional construction done that road will be heavily used by construction and residential increases. Also 230th Street was added for maintenance in case there is additional growth. Any funds remaining at the end ofthis agreement are returned to the City. They want to make sure they are able to spend the money that is on the table. Mayor Soderberg stated he would be willing to approve an amount equal to what they would statutorily get if annexed by ordinance. MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to approve the Joint Resolution/Orderly Annexation Agreement between Castle Rock Township and the City of Farmington as amended by the Town Board and forwarded to Council. Voting against: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson. MOTION FAILED. Councilmember Pritzlaff thought they had a good agreement. There has been a lot of work done on the hard lines. He suggested removing the hard lines and let annexation petitions come to the Council along with any pending annexation petitions. He suggested for the properties with the Ash Street project which would have received revenue, taking the revenue off the table. Councilmember McKnight and members of the Town Board were willing to continue discussions to try and reach an agreement prior to the public hearing on September 18 for the annexations of the Mock and Olson properties. Council reached a consensus to continue to work on reaching an agreement. Council Minutes (Regular) August 7,2006 Page 9 b) Consider Mock and Olson Annexation Petitions - Administration MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto direct staff and the City Attorney to proceed with the scheduling of the public hearings that would be required to annex the Olson and Mock properties by ordinance. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 12. NEWBUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE a) Liquor Store Check Acceptance Policy - Finance At a previous meeting Councilmember McKnight inquired about the Farmington only check policy at the liquor stores. This was due to the number and cost of NSF checks received. Within the month staff will be instituting the Tele-Check feature which will allow staff to accept checks from everywhere. This would be an electronic funds transfer. Councilmember Fogarty: Thanked everyone who participated in National Night Out. She welcomed Interim Police Chief Brian Lindquist. She attended Dakota Electric's Night at the Zoo and it was a wonderful turnout. The County Fair is underway and on Wednesday there will be a ceremony to ask Congressman Kline to submit the legislation for the naming of the Post Office. In the past the area of 190th Street has been used as a staging area for seal coat projects. This area will no longer be used for staging. She thanked everyone at the Police Department for putting on the Citizen's Police Academy. Councilmember McKnight: He noted a donation was received for the Rambling River Center from the Jerry Wicktor family. Councilmember Wilson: Welcomed Sgt. Brian Lindquist as the Interim Police Chief. He heard from a number of residents who were pleased with his leadership in the Citizen's Police Academy. Regarding Mr. Jerry Ristow's item, Citizen Comments is an important component of meetings and that is the time for citizens to engage with the public. He does not believe that is the appropriate time for Council to make comments. That is why at the last meeting he waited until Council Roundtable to address Mr. Ristow's concerns. Councilmember PritzlajJ: Congratulated Sgt. Brian Lindquist on his appointment as Interim Police Chief and for his leadership in the Citizen's Police Academy. Council Minutes (Regular) August 7, 2006 Page 10 He also attended National Night Out events and he will also be attending the Dakota County Fair. City Administrator Herlofsky: Thanked the Council for his first 99 days at the City. He appreciated their support and the support of staff. Interim Police Chief Lindquist: Thanked Council for their support and he will do everything possible to fill the biggest shoes he has ever had to step into. He encouraged Council to contact him at any time. Mayor Soderberg: Interim Police Chief. Congratulated Sgt. Brian Lindquist on his appointment as As he will be absent, Councilmember Fogarty will be attending the naming of the Post Office event during the fair. There is some neat history that goes along with that and there will be displays at the fair. National Night Out was a blast. Even with the rain there was a record number of block parties this year. He received a great letter from a nine-year old who thinks his two older brothers are too tough on him and thinks the Mayor has the authority to change that. Mayor Soderberg read the letter from Tanner Hackert and a letter from his parents. Mayor Soderberg stated to Tanner that everyone should be treated equally and with respect. If your older brothers and sisters require you to wait on them do it cheerfully and go the extra mile, because if you give them more than they ask for, they will realize you are a special young fellow. To Tanner's brothers, appreciate your younger brother. You are family. He looked forward to meeting Tanner. 14. ADJOURN MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to adjourn at 9:23 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, (;~ __ //f' - 'V>~ g'/?, T--~-'(::4......-"~ r~~ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES AUGUST 15, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Soderberg called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Also Present: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Brian Lindquist, Interim Police Chief; Lee Mann, City Engineer/Public Works Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Mike Cox, Chris Zemmer, John McNamara, Wold Architects Nancy Daubenberger, Ken Johnson, MnDOT Audience: Bart Winkler 2. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to approve the agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. CITY HALL Wold architects presented the schematic design for the new City Hall to be located at the corner of Spruce and 3rd Street. There will be parking in back and at the 2nd Street parking lot. Overflow parking would be available at the library. A roundabout is proposed for the intersection of Spruce and 3rd Street. The main entrance would be off of3rd Street. The main level would consist of Parks and Recreation, Community Development, Engineering, Council Chambers, conference rooms and storage areas. In the Council Chambers, Councilmembers would like room for staff along both sides of the room near the Council table. The upper floor will consist of Administration, Finance, Human Resources, conference rooms and storage. City Administrator Herlofsky proposed to begin scanning files to minimize the storage requirements for paperwork. Councilmember McKnight noted the information gave projected staff for 2020 and 2030. He requested the numbers of current staff by department. Councilmember Fogarty recommended leasing the future expansion space. This could be used by a non-profit agency, Dakota County, etc. The outside of the building will consist of cornices and large windows that will fit in with the downtown architecture. The color of the brick will be similar to other downtown buildings. The building will be a vision of the future of the downtown yet connect with the historic features. Councilmember Pritzlaff suggested coordinating some design Council Workshop Minutes August 15,2006 Page 2 elements with the Spruce Street bridge. Councilmember Wilson would like to have a public open house to receive comments from residents. The construction cost would be $7,000,000, project cost $2,143,000, for a total cost of $9,143,000. These costs are mid-2007. Mayor Soderberg liked the design with lots of space and room for expansion. The area around the outside will be consistent with the current downtown streetscape. The time line is as follows: Council approval August 21, 2006 Design development October 30, 2006 Call for bids April 2, 2007 Award the contract May 7, 2007 Project completion May/June 2008 4. TH3 ROUNDABOUTS/FUNDING There is a potential funding opportunity for roundabouts on TH3. Roundabouts are a tool used to control crossing traffic. Circulating traffic has the right-of-way, entering traffic has to yield. All traffic goes in the same direction. A slower speed is required and there is no parking allowed. Advantages include: - Reduced delay as it takes less time to get through an intersection. - A roundabout is always better than all-way signal control. - A roundabout is usually better than two-way signal control. - A roundabout is usually better than a signal. - Increased safety for vehicles and pedestrians. - Reduced environmental impacts. Goals include: - Traffic calming. - Crash reduction. A railroad crossing could back traffic up into a roundabout. The grade of the road should be 5% or less. At 195th Street and TH3 the grade coming down does meet this requirement. MnDOT avoids placing a roundabout on any grade 3% or greater because of ice conditions. When determining if a roundabout is appropriate, pedestrian capacity is taken into account. On TH3 MnDOT recommended spacing roundabouts Yz mile or more apart. There is the potential to look at roundabouts on TH3 at Elm and Spruce when Spruce Street opens up. There are three roundabouts shown on the plan along the Newland property. According to MnDOT in a new installation a roundabout is cheaper than a signal. Councilmember McKnight asked when Council will have a presentation from MnDOT on signals and reduced speed on TH3 and what that would do for traffic safety. MnDOT noted within the last month they did a speed study on TH3 through Empire Township. The average speed is 55 mph in a 55 posted area. Reducing the speed to 45 mph causes Council Workshop Minutes August 15, 2006 Page 3 more potential for accidents because drivers are comfortable with 55 mph. MnDOT did not recommend lowering the speed. Regarding signals at 195th Street, these would be required in order to access TH3 and the developer would have to build turn lanes. Signals would be needed soon after development. Up to $550,000 in funding would be available for roundabouts. The City and Empire Township would need to pass a resolution to receive the funding. Mayor Soderberg directed staff to have this on the August 21 agenda for consideration. The Selection Committee would include people outside of MnDOT such as City and County staff. If Empire does not pass a resolution, the biggest decision would be money. Staffwill contact Empire Township. It will be on the August 21 Council agenda to decide whether to pursue the funding or not. If it is determined to move forward, the resolution would be brought to Council on September 5,2006. The application is due October 15,2006. 5. SOUTHEAST AREA STUDIES Staff is looking for direction on finalizing the system plans and direction on allocating the sewer capacity. This is concerning the area in the southeast comer ofthe City. To serve the area the City would have to add one well and 500,000 gallons of storage which can be done. Regarding sewer, the southerly edge of the plan follows the flood plain. Staffhas had discussions with the owner of the Braun property and he is interested in annexing. Staff will need to check on the capacity needed to serve this property. There is enough capacity for 665-765 units. The City would build a pipe along Biscayne ahead of the interceptor. The study assumed the City would put in a separate line. It is assumed there would be an elementary school on the Angus property. Council reached a consensus that the boundary is set. If there are a couple properties that are currently in the City, that is where the current availability should go. If a property will be annexed, that is the amount of capacity that should be requested. Council agreed to serve City properties first. Availability would be allocated to whoever develops first and then build a sewer line for what is needed for other City properties. All properties could be developed if it does not exceed capacity. Mr. Bart Winkler proposes 200 units consisting of 100 single-family and 100 multi- family units. He is not working with the Devney's unless the City wants him to. He wanted to know if the City is prepared to officially allocate sewer so he can bring in plans. He does not want to spend the money ifhe cannot get the capacity. Council agreed the City can serve properties 13.1 and 12.1 now. Councilmember McKnight noted if a property cannot be developed because they do not have the capacity, he does not want to annex the property. Council directed staff to look at properties 13.1 and 12.1 and give the remaining units to Mr. Garvey when annexed. There would be 2-3 years to look at additional lines. Council agreed they need to decide what we want the area to look like. Mayor Soderberg asked if the acreage charge will change from 13.1 to 12.1. Staffwill have to research this and also whether it will change citywide. Council Workshop Minutes August 15,2006 Page 4 6. ADJOURN MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to adjourn at 9:43 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, l(j~~,-rL:;- ) "?<cd6~ CYnthia Muller Executive Assistant 7; CITY OF FARMINGTON SUMMARY OF REVENUES JULY 31, 2006 58.38 % Year Complete 2006< ................ . . :~~~~~BUDGE1~~~:~: ~CURREN~T~~~ :~~::::::::YTO:::: ::::: nRI;:ffl,<(pNT. · .ZOIW ....PpR(;lEffC <200ti. . .yto >2MF $ $ % % GENERAL FUND Property Taxes 5,298,201 506,859 2,512,116 47.41 2,210,096 46.53 Licenses 29,600 4,054 23,905 80.76 19,861 69.31 Permits 977,156 78,366 525,706 53.80 338,546 30.88 Fines 83,100 7,370 44,662 53.74 29,733 38.07 Intergovernment Revenue 350,000 70,769 150,043 42.87 170,651 55.05 Charges for Service 439,000 44,190 207,533 47.27 173,981 45.07 Investment Interest 225,000 18,750 131,250 58.33 131,250 58.33 Miscellaneous 13,500 1,524 6,126 45.38 14,528 145.28 Transfers 347,900 28,992 202,942 58.33 137,667 58.33 Total General Fund 7,763,457 760,874 3,804,283 49.00 3,226,313 45.31 SPECIAL REVENUE HRA Operating Fund 20,000 771 105,847 529.24 203,758 993.94 Police Forfeitures Fund 8,000 4,024 7,405 92.56 1,511 18.77 Park Improvement Fund 296,000 45,400 119,060 40.22 349,919 119.84 Recreation Operating Fund 298,030 24,686 148,468 49.82 178,007 59.04 Ice Arena 252,500 5,187 150,170 59.47 139,989 56.56 874,530 80,068 530,950 60.71 873,184 164.46 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Liquor Operations 3,803,800 385,171 2,208,270 58.05 1,867,662 50.26 Sewer 1,510,000 65,699 700,201 46.37 663,994 43.29 Solid Waste 1,917,000 96,167 916,337 47.80 880,333 50.36 Storm Water 300,000 16,025 207,634 69.21 214,251 91.17 Water 1,745,000 175,816 858,635 49.21 904,487 53.36 9,275,800 738,878 4,891,077 52.73 4,530,727 50.75 Total Revenues 17,913,787 1,579,820 9,226,310 51.50 8,630,224 51.01 CITY OF FARMINGTON SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES JULY 31,2006 mT-~1~~m .... ..~~. .......mf:~~~r GENERAL FUND $ % $ % Legislative 68,350 4,246 45,329 66.32 57,224 85.20 Administration 491,929 52,229 248,991 50.62 274,258 60.21 Elections 19,220 35 41 0.00 0.00 Communications 71,211 5,246 35,790 50.26 36,422 51.38 Human Resources 215,228 21,791 114,427 53.17 108,509 55.59 Information Technology 117,716 13,801 71,926 61.10 73,498 68.19 Finance 457,719 47,770 270,229 59.04 260,529 62.98 Planning 178,539 19,354 100,831 56.48 104,029 59.76 Building Inspection 438,673 50,712 235,929 53.78 222,445 54.69 Community Development 180,809 19,673 98,948 54.73 55,094 34.65 Police Administration 643,261 57,960 330,635 51.40 356,865 59.09 Patrol Services 1,656,674 181,706 906,836 54.74 882,437 58.12 Investigation Services 374,145 43,213 219,707 58.72 193,955 69.87 Emergency Management 5,200 1,001 19.25 84,979 1634.21 Fire 486,648 54,521 236,229 48.54 182,243 42.80 Rescue 44,358 587 31,560 71.15 22,489 52.17 Engineering 278,815 36,036 187,403 67.21 195,775 68.82 G.I.S. 500 77 77 15.40 137 1.40 Streets 510,576 52,589 285,535 55.92 278,527 58.93 Snow Removal 94,263 157 79,100 83.91 73,932 71.82 Signal Maint 115,600 82 60,613 52.43 52,581 49.79 Natural Resources 76,632 4,542 49,584 64.70 18,381 32.66 Park Maint 443,348 57,005 268,556 60.57 247,331 60.74 Building Maint 150,439 6,837 72,501 48.19 65,929 41.73 Recreation Programs 436,074 58,885 242,986 55.72 235,385 62.66 Transfers Out 207,530 75,000 36.14 106,500 50.00 Total General Fund 7,763,457 789,054 4,269,764 55.00 4,189,454 58.84 SPECIAL REVENUE HRA Operating 40,000 3,632 115,563 288.91 14,649 34.80 Police Forfeitures Fund 8,000 202 1,840 23.00 4,221 52.43 Park Improvement Fund 415,000 20,405 172,666 41.61 111,035 21.03 Senior Center 158,538 16,758 85,206 53.74 85,954 57.90 Swimming Pool 139,492 59,589 94,876 68.02 101,406 71.15 Ice Arena 329,341 25,238 246,822 74.94 158,175 64.00 1,090,371 125,824 716,973 65.75 475,440 42.59 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Liquor Operations 3,812,398 280,731 2,469,680 64.78 1,906,340 53.52 Sewer 1,505,743 98,737 689,409 45.79 648,845 42.09 Solid Waste 2,030,008 130,876 1,205,013 59.36 945,805 53.42 Storm Water 335,066 45,130 218,022 65.07 161,557 40.30 Water Utility 1,432,823 112,106 794,224 55.43 368,936 32.35 9,116,038 667,580 5,376,348 58.98 4,031,483 47.91 Total Expenditures 17,969,866 1,582,458 10,363,085 57.67 8,696,377 52.22 7c... City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City AdministratorJr Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director V FROM: SUBJECT: Capital Outlay - Parks DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION The installation of an irrigation system in Depot Way Arts Park was identified in the master plan developed for the park and was identified in the 2006 Park Improvement Fund budget. DISCUSSION/BUDGET IMPACT The Depot Way Arts Park irrigation system involves the need for a plumbing company, an irrigation company and an electrical company to work together on the installation of the entire irrigation system. Quotes were solicited from several contractors for installing these three items. Sauber Plumbing from Farmington submitted the quote for the plumbing work at a cost of $2,485. Cities Electric from Farmington submitted the low quote for the electrical work in the amount of $2,500. Green Lawn Underground Sprinklers submitted the low quote for the irrigation system installation at a cost of $9,088. The total cost of the irrigation system is $14,073. The following identifies the costs of the park improvement compared to the estimated cost that was developed during the Depot Way Arts Park master planning process: Park Depot Way Arts Park Improvement irrigation installation Bud2et $15,000 Quote $14,073 (Quote-Est) ($927) ACTION REQUESTED No action is requested. This is for informational purposes only. ~ullYlrrtO tsf; D~d, Parks and Recreation Director City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ciJarmington.mn.us lc/ TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator@ FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Appointment Recommendation - Public Works DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION AND ACTION REQUESTED This memorandum provides information and a recommendation regarding the staffing change in the proposed organizational structure of the Public Works Department. The action requested is for Council to approve the appointment of Mr. Todd Reiten to the position of Assistant Director of Public Works. DISCUSSION The proposed organizational change within Public Works requires promoting the Fleet Supervisor, Todd Reiten, to the Assistant Director for Public Works. This change allows for better management of the maintenance divisions of the Public Works Department, maximizes efficiency and productivity; and positions the department for organizational changes that will become necessary as the City continues to grow. The cost of the change for the remainder of 2006 would be approximately $1000.00 and is attributed to the change in compensation. Mr. Reiten began his employment with the City in August of 1993 as a mechanic and was promoted to Fleet Supervisor in May of 2001. Mr. Reiten has demonstrated that he has the knowledge, skills and abilities required to meet the qualifications for the position. Respectfully submitted, ,/ ) . , . / / r:_ Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Director cc: Personnel File City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter J. Herlofsky, Jr. City Administrator SUBJECT: Reorganization of City Departments DATE: August 21,2006 DISCUSSION Attached for review are the current organizational charts for the Engineering/Public Works department and the Community Development department. Also attached are proposed layouts for the Engineering/Public Works department and the Community Development department. What is being planned is a reorganization of the Public Works department by including the Solid Waste division into the municipal services area and placing Mr. Todd Reiten as the Assistant Public Works Director. Other issues that are included are the placement of the Inspections department under Engineering and leaving the Community Development department with Planning and EDA support. ACTION REQUESTED The action needed by the Council is the recommendation to adjust Mr. Todd Reiten's salary to be appropriate to the promotion that is being proposed. The cost on an annual basis is approximately $1,000.00. The attached memorandum from Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director explains the conditions. Ifthere are any questions, please give me a call. R.eg..subm...~'tted'. '. I. ./JJ---l: ~ \ ~ . ~ J/ ;6--// Pet~; J. Herlof: y, Jr. ' / City Administrator CMuller/Herlofsky/Council Memos/Reorganization of City Depts . --- >. "0 e: Q) ~ ~ ~.2 .- 0 0 cI).c-z "'e:a. .2 0 ~ e:UQ) .Q 0:: tv :E (/) I ~ ... I ~ I ~.2 >. .2 .oe: .~ 0 Q) e: .oro I e: '" ....J ro :J.t:: Q)'- e:.t:: old .0 :.: ~ 00 . ::J I Q)l'l o::~ E:E I ll.. ,- 0:: :J 1- ~~ "O(/) -- "8~ I-jl i I u. t:: ro .c () ro Q) C :> 0 c:.=; t: ~ '" ~ :;::; o~- ro l!!~e: roe:~ Q) e: ~ ~ ro .!!l ro ~ <'ll Q) e: <'ll Q) . e:~ Ne:~ oe:~ ....J.- '" <3 E'- .o!!O ~!!O ro "0 ::l lii ~c(c( o.S 3: Q) .S 3: ~ mill ....,Ill C> 0 ....J~ cu ~ :E :E ... e:3:~ 0 ~ .- e:oQ) I Q) ~ ro._ Q) I I (/) :E :c .S ~~ ~ Q):J0l I I ... Q) c.. e: -(/) ~ ....J.....W ai~ E 0 l:i ~ ti e: 0 0,- Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ tl Ncaa. ro e: ~ Q) e: ~ ~ -0.:=00 ai~~ OlroQ) :0 0 5l'~ a oe:~ c!!:o :E~O ::J 0'- a. ~.~ 3: e: .S 3: a.Ea. ll.. O"O:J e: <'ll a:c((/) e::E ~:E - ~ " c Q) ... ... ::J () e: ~ Q)'~ .g~~ o ~ 0 Uii)Q) >.'c I- :i:Qi "0 .- t: o Q) e: E 0 o e: ~ ~"Oa. e: .- C> c(a. roOl <3~ :J (/)e: C fc~Q) (/) Q)W 'C L- fj ~.~ ;1 :>= Q) ro.2 Q) ~ii)0l OU .- e: C ::lw C> c( I c W . II " " II II II II II II II II Ij II II " '6~ e:e:~ ~roQ) c(e:~ ~!!o Q) .S 3: _ro (/):E I '" ~ Qje: .oCO~ .oe:Q) :JQ)~ Oeo E '(ij 3: 0:E I-~ _.~i ; Ci; :~ oQ)e: ro .S -fi >0lQ) tTIl- -I ~I II II " .. " ~ ~:l_ .25\&1 -Q)CO <3 0:: '0 - Q) e:COa. ~.3U) co z T Ol e: .~ E Q) Q) e:- .- e: Ol- e: W I . 1::: ro .s:::. () ro c: o ~. c: ro C> .... o (/) .:x::: .... ~ .5:2 :0 :::J ll. "C Q) (/) o c.. o .... ll. . z. (3 Iii oX (; c: :s: ~ lij .2 al ~:a .=: alii g' ...JeW (; u ~ is " " >- II - .c 1 " >- Ql III " lij'~ >- .!.! ~.!.! c: Ql - r- Ql c: ~ ~'2 C:o. - ...J ro .c c: roo c:ti :;, ro .- 0 0 ~<( o Ql oti ~.g a Qj o::~ E Ql .20Ql Ql II o~ c: u I.) u: I ~ o Ql I II . 0= 0:: I ro -r.1 ~ T I " II T I 1 OQl c: Cii , "2'(;)c 8 * t- o Ql 'ijj ro .2 ro Ql III Ql :2 > .!::lQl~ c:co.9 =seno a;'ln'- '3 !! c:; .21ii~ 0:::s:T!! :f~~ 0~T!! .ccv.9 011l~ o~- ~;g ~ g.:s: ~ c:~.s ~:m ~ :.:: ro._ Ql:2~ o ~ 2: ~:2 ~ ro ~ ...J.5 fj) ~;g ~ 1 '0= ~ 0 ~00 ~00 ii5 :2 ~ >:2 ~ ro E 'Iii .s:: " (/) ,,00 U II (/) ~00 c: "0 III ~o:;, "O(/) Ql<(<( (/)(/) 0 >-(/) ...J~ T I- ro 1 T L :s: I T I - -- - I (; III 1 "[lfi c:t)i!: QlQlo ~6~ .- (,) r 0::_1.) .0.- 'c ~ "lijiS ::J Q) "8Ui:;' I~ Cf) ~.- a. ~o <( = -.-" (/) Ole: e: .Q .- +-' -00 = Q) ::J a. 0) (/) e: ::;~o 0,- Ql NCiia. -o.::oCl) :ll'!!! 1:: o.=: 8- o.Eo. E "'0 :J o.<((/) _1 III Ql:= 4; ~.~ =~(1) ~_o. .!!! (/) Ql .=: 1:: :;, E 0 (/) " 0. <(0. :;, (/) Ol e: 'C Q) Q) e: '0, e: W 1 - - Z. 1-=(3~ c:-Ql -~ s.~ ~1Il0l ....- c: ::lw <( I , (; Cii"g .so. a.5 ~~ ~~ :;, al T iii III '0 .- !i: ~O ...J0l c: c: Ql'O :.::== :;, al 1 Cl ~ Ql.~ .0 .?: 'c g~13 UUiQl >- 'c I- 1 -g 'E "5 3~l5: :;, (/) ~ I 1 1::~ III ~ lij ~ roC:~ Ql c: ~ =o~ ~~~ c: ro Ql ~c:~ c: c: ~ .Q~o oc:i!: ro~~ .:(roQ) I S'iQ ~ ~.!!o ~.!!o Q)~i!: _0 ~ -, ro .!! .~~ oX .- :::E ~:::E (/):::E I ~ 2: .!!! Ql T 3g. I I -r -1 -(/) I lil~ E a. c: ~ ~ ~ ~ c: ~ roC:~ -roQ) QlC:~ o C ~ alCi!: g>roQl !!!~~ c:.!!o ~aii!: ~.~ ~ _ 0 OQlo ~.~ ~ ~.s~ c~ ..!!!~ -, ro I ~ II (0 ~ I (; - ~ I.) I.) Ql Ql ~g>>'- ,,0. "OlIl ~:2tl Q) c: 11.- .- Ql c:0l oX:;'o. o.=: ~ co CI) 0:::2 nJ~.s ':; ~" I. al 1" II Tlr - :i: Q;w a; ~ , I.) QlW E g'ilc 0 _.~~ c .=: 0 E'- ro ro :;,- 01 roOlO .- Q.;'o > o III .=: Cj)e'::: ti ~.c c: ~'o 0 lIl:= Q) ~ l:l ~ al.- =Qlro Cii III (/) ._ .s:: ro .=: .E 8 0:: '0 c > .- c: ..c:: Cl~g Q) ~ ro.?: 0 > OIl.) - Ql c: Q) I.) c: c: Q) c: ro 0. 'rn 1: ou@ a:: Wit w~ ~.3U) c:- ro W T T. z T ~ ~ T II " t:: CI:l .s:: () CI:l C o :;:; CI:l .!::::! c CI:l 0) ..... o c Q) E 0- = 0 0- ~ Q) ~ ~ > 0 ellQ)~ OO~ '~~6 Q) c: ~ '" E E o o - C Q,) E Cl.. o Q,) > Q,) o >- :t= C ::l E E o () c: ell Q)'U <Il > .- '0,:;::; .2 '- ~ {.) ell ~ Q) o .~ I- .~'E "5 ....J " 0- <(g- Cf) ii5 Q):= L.. .~ .~ ~roQ) ==.::;0.. ;2 .!!1 Cf) Q) .!: t= '" E 0 Cf),,0- <(g- Cf) ro rn :Q .~ :5 -- ....J Ol c: .S ~g '" lJ:l c .~ Q.) W EE:= - u g g-.~ oQiQ) ~ tIl iU Cf) - 0 ~ >- Q):"!:::: CiO ~ O-~ Q) s: ~ ~ ~ell ~.~ c:: o <Il 1-<( - -'" Gi .2 c: E ~ Cf)e:: 3lz. ....J(3 o ~U Q) Q) E 0- := en 0.!: QiOl ~ c: ro:o 0= '" lJ:l B ~ u Q) Q) ,,0- " <Il Q) c: LL.- c: g> o .- a:::g '" lJ:l u Q)0l~ g-.~ .8 ~g~ -"''''0- Q) lJ:l <Il ro~.s ;2M 1: co .c o co c o :0::; CO .t::! c CO 0) ..... o +J C Q.) E a. o Q.) > Q.) o >. ~ c :J E E o o "0 Q.) (/) o a. o ..... a.. ~ c Q) E 0. = 0 0- ~ Q) ~ > ro Q) 00 '5~ Q) C :.:: ~ E E o o C ro Q) '0 (/) > .- 'rn~ E - ~ u ro~Q) O.~ I- ro .- t:: .!!! E 0 -' -0 0. <(0. ~ (/) I ~ c ~ .~ Q) U; :>EE= u g ~.~ 8 w Q) ~UJ~(/) - 0 ~ >- (l):!:::::' 0.0 ~ o.~ Q) - ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~.~ 0: o l/) 1-<( -'" iii .2 c E ~ (/)0: 3l~ -'(3 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7e. TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator ~ FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Approve Joint Powers Agreement of Fiber Optic Network DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION AND ACTION REQUESTED This memorandum provides information regarding the attached Joint Powers Agreement between the State of Minnesota, Dakota County, Independent School District 192 and the City. The action requested is for Council to approve the Joint Powers Agreement for the Development of Optical Fiber Network. DISCUSSION For several months, the City has worked with Dakota County, the State of Minnesota and ISD 192 to become a part of the County wide fiber optic network. The development of this network will connect the parties to each other, to the State's network (MNET) and to LOGIS. The City will utilize its existing fiber infrastructure as part of this cooperative agreement. The only potential cost could be to rearrange the fiber connections at Akin Road Elementary school. If that connection is needed, the appropriate budgetary funding will be available to cover those costs. The advantages of this fiber network includes higher download and upload speeds allowing for greater efficiency and productivity. Additionally, this network minimizes, and possibly eliminates, the City's dependence on Tllines thereby reducing our cost of telephone services. The attached agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. Respectfully submitted, /", . .~ // '.).. ... ':>0.1 -. !. /, " ,-', __~c .U' ,_.. .' ". (.-c ;,__ / "'( - ',,~,' /--, ""." f/, .'; , Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Director cc: File JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF OPTICAL FIBER NETWORK [his agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Office of Enterprise Technology ("State"), the County of Dakota ("County"), Independent School District 192 ("ISD 192"), and the City of Farmington ("City") collectively referred to as the "Parties." The Parties are governmental units of the State of Minnesota. 1. General Purpose This Agreement is made and entered into pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. The Parties have an interest in developing a fiber optic based network (the "Network") connecting the Parties to each other and to the State's network, MNET, using a combination of fiber optic facilities owned by several of the Parties and network equipment provided by the State to enable the Parties to jointly and cooperatively develop and implement communications among their institutional sites. The resulting network will be managed by the State through its Office of Enterprise Technology. Attachment A shows the intended use of each set of fibers. This network and the associated fiber facilities are intended for public sector use only and may not be used for commercial purposes. 2. Term of Agreement The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective date of July 1,2006, or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes Section l6C.05, subdivision 2, whichever is later, and shall remain in full force and effect until the Expiration date of Twenty years after the Effective Date, or unless terminated by the Parties as provided in this Agreement, whichever occurs first. 3. Agreement between the Parties The intended use for each segment of the network is to enable the parties to construct and manage a fiber optic communications network for the purpose of delivering communications services among their respective institutional sites as more fully described below and in Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Each party will be responsible for any necessary patches or splices within their facilities. 3.1 ISD 192 will provide: . 1 pair of fibers from North Trail Elementary to the Farmington High School ("High School") . 1 pair of fibers from Akin Road Elementary to the High School . 1 pair of fibers from the High School to the County Extension Building patched through at the ISD 192 Tech Center (will be spliced when the Tech Center is vacated). . 5 pairs of shared lSD/City fiber from the South Fire Station to the High School . Space and environmental services for State network equipment in the High School 3.2 City will provide: . 5 pairs of shared City/ISD 192 fiber from the South Fire Station to the High School . 4 pairs of fibers from the Police Station to Akin Road Elementary . 12 pairs of fiber spliced to County fiber from the Library to the Police Station, 1 pair active for this project. . 5 pairs of fiber from the Police Station to the South Fire Station . A share of the cost to rearrange the fiber connections at Akin Road Elementary 3.3 County will provide: . 1 pair of fibers from Parkview Elementary to North Trail Elementary Farmington JPA 8-3-2006 v2 . 1 pair of fibers from Parkview Elementary to the Dakota County Western Service Center . 1 pair of fibers from the High School to the ISD 194 District Office (acquired under a separate agreement with ISD 192) . 12 pairs of fiber from the Library spliced to City fiber connecting to the Police Station, 1 pair active for this project 3.4 State will provide: . Network equipment at the High School . Network design, installation and management of the connections from Farmington to the State network . VLAN connections for the Library, City and Police Station to the State network. Service costs may be associated with these connections. . 100 Mbps connection for ISD 192 shared with ISD 194 from the High School to the State network hub at the Dakota County Western Service Center . A 100 Mbps connection shared among ISD 192, 194 and 196 from the Western Service Center to the MNET terminations at the 511 Building or the U of M at 90 Church St 4. Payment Unless specifically noted, each Party will bear its own costs and there are no cost reimbursements or payments from a Party to any other Party under this Agreement except for the shared cost between the City and ISD 192 under section 3.2. 5. Network Development, Design, Operation And Management The State will design the Network and install and manage the electronic devices needed to make the networ' operational. The parties shall use all reasonable efforts to maintain their respective associated fiber facilities to enable the Network to remain fully functional. 6. Liaisons To assist the Parties in the day-to-day performance of this Agreement and to ensure compliance with the specifications and provide ongoing consultation, liaisons shall be designated by the Parties. The Parties shall inform the others, in writing, of any change in the designated liaison. At the time of execution of this Agreement the following persons are the designated liaisons: The State's Liaison is: Jim E.Johnson Director of Network and Telecommunications Services Minnesota Office of Enterprise Technology 658 Cedar St St Paul, Minnesota 55155 651.296.6345 The County's Liaison is: David Asp Information Technology Data Network Specialist Dakota County 1590 Highway 55 Hastings, MN 55033 651.438.4271 Farmington JPA 8-3-2006 v2 2 The City's Liaison is: Brenda Wendlandt Human Resources Director City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55204 651.463.1806 ISD 192's Liaison is: Rosalyn Pautzke Director Administrative Services Independent School District 192 421 Walnut Street, P.O. Box 329 Farmington, Minnesota 55024 651-463-5092 7. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete 7.1 Assignment No Party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior consent of the other Parties and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Agreement, or their successors in office. 7.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Agreement, or their successors in office. 7.3 Waiver. If any Party fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 7.4 Contract Complete. This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the Parties. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind any party. 8. Liability and Insurance Each party to this Agreement shall be liable for the acts of their own agents, volunteers or employees and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party, its agents, volunteers or employees. It is understood and agreed that liability and damages arising from the parties' acts and omissions are governed by the provisions of the municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 466, the Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. 93.736, as applicable, and other applicable laws. Each Party warrants that they are able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through an insurance or self-insurance program and that each has minimum coverage consistent with the liability limits contained in Minn. Stat. Ch. 466 or Minn. Stat. 93.736, as applicable. This agreement to indemnify and hold harmless does not constitute a waiver by any Party of limitations on liability provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466, Minnesota Statutes ~ 3.736 or other applicable law. Farmington lPA 8-3-2006 v2 3 This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies that each party may have for the other's failure to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. 9. State Audits Under Minn. Stat. 9 16C.05, subd. 5, each Party's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this Agreement. 10. Government Data Practices The Parties must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by each Party under this Agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by any Party under this Agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. 9 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by any Party. If any Party receives a request to release data referred to in this Clause that was received by the Party receiving the request from another Party, the Party receiving the request to release the data must immediately notify the Party from whom the data originated. The originating Party will give the Party receiving the request to release the data instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. 11. Venue Venue for all legal proceedings out of this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in either Dakota or Ramsey County, Minnesota. 12. Termination 12.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by any Party, with or without cause, at any time after two (2) years after the Effective Date upon 180 days written notice of intent to terminate to the other Parties. 12.2 Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the other Parties. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the other Parties will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the Agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the other Parties notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State's receiving that notice. 12.3 Termination by County - Lack of Funding. The County may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, Minnesota Agencies or other funding source, or if its funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow payment of the amounts due under this Agreement. The County is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after written notice of termination for lack of funding. However, the other Parties will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The County will not b assessed any penalty or damages if this Agreement is terminated due to lack of funding. The County must provide the other Parties notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the County's receiving Farmington lPA 8-3-2006 v2 4 that notice. Written notice of termination sent by the County to the other Parties by facsimile is sufficient notice under the terms of this Agreement. 12.4 Ownership. At the end of the term of this Agreement or upon its termination the parties will continue to own all sections of fiber optic cable that they presently own and the State will own the electronic devices it installed pursuant to this Agreement. 13. Miscellaneous Provisions Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may be amended by written consent of all Parties. The addition of a new Party to this Agreement shall require a written amendment approved by all Parties. Should any provision of this Agreement be found unlawful, the other provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect if by doing so the purposes of this Agreement, taken as a whole, can be made operative. Should any such provision or article be found unlawful, representatives of the Parties shall meet for the purpose of arriving at an agreement on a lawful provision to replace the unlawful provision or article. The newly agreed upon provision or amendment must be approved by the governing body of each Party. The State of Minnesota, acting through its Office of Enterprise Technology, the County of Dakota, Independent School District 192, and the City of Farmington hereby grant each other mutual continuing Licenses for access to their respective property as reasonably needed from time to time, for the installation, maintenance and repair of the Network, which Licenses shall remain in effect for the duration of this Agreement. The Parties shall abide by all Federal, State and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations now in effect or hereinafter adopted pertaining to this Agreement and to the facilities, programs and staff for which each Party is responsible. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental units have caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers. State Title Date Dakota County Brandt Richardson, County Administrator Date City Kevan Soderberg, Mayor Date -'.ty "....1 Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator Date Farmington JPA 8-3-2006 v2 5 ISD 192 Farmington JPA 8-3-2006 v2 Title Date Distribution: State County City ISD 192 6 Attachment A Itended use of fiber segments (see Figure 1): A One pair of County fibers connecting to MNET B Same as A C One pair of ISD 192 fibers connecting to the Extension Building D Continuing fibers connecting to the Extension Building E Library connection through the Police Station to the High School F One pair for City connection; one pair for the Library connection G One pair for City/Police Department connection to MNET; one pair for Library connection to MNET; three pairs for ISD 192 redundant route from High School to Akin Road Elementary H Same as G I Shared connection to ISD 194 J one pair for Police Department alternate route to High School; three pairs for ISD 192 redundant route from High School to Akin Road Elementary K Continuation of the Police Department alternate route to the High School. Farmington lPA 8-3-2006 v2 7 -0 co C 0 o 0::: OJ'w 0 C C C :so:: .;:: Co 2 0 0.... (]) <( >< O.........U o 'w W 0.... ->> tE 0 ~ a3 o.BOo.....!:: ~ o~ 0--.... 'S,Qr.:(]) .- >< C (]) 0 '-' t) w 0 .0 _ 0 ---l ';:: E (])o:;:::::;;;:::.........(/) -t)t C U >- C 0 .- co cc(])~....oo....oa. o 0 C'- CO._ - (]) u:;:::::;cO,Q:rg~d';o 2~8.B---l(/)o......(]) co C (]) -0 =- (]) ........- 0 ,2 US C co (]) co.= (j) (f) (5 .... 8 - ,2 I LL .0 - 0.... ,E (])(/)o..>-E;;:::.B E _....(Jl:!:ON.... (j)co,E....O....o>(])e (j) - (])........--.......o- ....,Q(/).....o........ ;;:::.... .0 (])-....(]);;:::(])(])O (]) ;;::: .oNO,Q .o.o(/)N.o N ;;:::m--~;;:::;;:::-O>;;::: 0> >-......NNC>>>->........>> ...... cOo>m::l:t=:!::t=O:!: 0 ::1(/)............ 0 OOO(f)O ~(f) o-OOO----_co- 0-(/)(/)-000-0-- ,o__o(Jl(Jl(Jlo(Jlco ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ID ~ 'm 'm 'm 'm 'm 'm 'm 'm 'm'm E 'm a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.(])a. ..............................NLOLO......-.:;tW...... <(lDOOWu..<.9I_J (]) - ::I o .... (]) - co C .... (]) ::: CO C o :;:::::; CO US (]) .2 o 0.... N ...... LO ("i) - (Jl ~ CO - CO o CD u IE o N en ... C ~ co o I ("i) N I LO ..c u ~.. NJ!l ene ...GI cO ~ o LO I"- ("i) - (Jl ~ CO - CO o 5r:>> .- e fil- e'\:! J!l'S ~aJ tn Z 0 ~ 0 W Z Z r:>> ,fa 0 e 0 0 .. gt~ III '-l/l r:t:: ';( E..c w ",~ W ~ lLJ: m - LL Z 0 <( (]) I- - -.:;t,Q C) c...... m:t:: (]) (]) ......0 Z E .... 0 - .!:: ::I (Jl 0_ - u .Ql (/) ~ (/) .2 :aE S co .... ElLL - ot) - 0 co r:t:: <( - 0 -6 <C LL Farmington lPA 8-3-2006 v2 8 .... o - III J: a- U S e GI o .. o '2 GI l/l ~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7[ TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator:? Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director FROM: SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Designating Data Practices Responsible Authority for Law Enforcement DATE: August 21,2006 INTRODUCTION With a change in personnel, it is necessary to designate a Responsible Authority for Data Practices for Law Enforcement. DISCUSSION The City Council previously designated Police Chief, Dan Siebenaler as the responsible authority under Data Practices for Law Enforcement. Since the action taken required the name and title of the responsible authority, it becomes necessary to designate a new responsible authority. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution designating the Interim Police Chief, Brian Lindquist, as the Responsible Authority for Data Practices for Law Enforcement. Respectfully submitted, " ~ L.- .).~,... ....'. ./11 I_'-~'_{. '" - . ,.c t\_/ .~ - ',;-, - '- Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Director cc: file RESOLUTION NO. R -06 DESIGNATING DATA PRACTICES RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 st day of August 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, The Minnesota Data Practices Law requires the City to appoint a Responsible Authority, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Farmington, Minnesota, hereby appoints Brian Lindquist in his term as Interim Police Chief, as the Responsible Authority for Law Enforcement pursuant to Minnesota Data Practices statutes. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21 st day of August 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of August 2006. City Administrator SEAL City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ciJarmington.mn.us ?5 TO: Mayor and Councilmember's City Administrator (j Brian Lindquist, Acting Police Chief FROM: SUBJECT: Appoint Interim Director of Emergency Management DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION / DISCUSSION The City of Farmington maintains an Emergency Operations Plan in compliance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requirements. The Chief Law Enforcement Officer has traditionally been charged with the responsibility of maintaining and implementing the Emergency Operations Plan. In compliance with FEMA requirements, the Chief Law Enforcement Official will be responsible to oversee and direct the Emergency Operations Plan and assume command during any emergency event. ACTION REQUESTED Appoint Acting Chief Lindquist as Interim Director of Emergency Management lly submitted, ? /:-- -If-- ~ ,;z/ L- .~. ~ Brian Lindquist ~ Acting Chief of Police City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7h TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator (j.. \' "- Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director FROM: SUBJECT: Temporary On-Sale Liquor License - St. Michael's Church DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION St. Michael's Church is requesting a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for their Fall Festival to be held September 16-17, 2006. DISCUSSION This event will be held on St. Michael's property located at 22120 Denmark Ave. Per State Statute, a Temporary Liquor license must first be approved by the City and then forwarded to the State for approval. BUDGET IMPACT The State of Minnesota waives all fees for Temporary Liquor Licenses for non-profit organizations. Therefore, the City has not established a fee for a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the attached application for a Temporary Liquor License for St. Michael's Church, 22120 Denmark Ave., for their Fall Festival, September 16-17, 2006. Respectfully submitted, ,/ , . 7 /~ _/' 11-, ~/"j~/t'. ~/~[{(Xt~~ Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ciJarmington.mn.us 7/ # TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator 'Cl-/ I \- Jennifer Collova, Natural Resource Specialist FROM: SUBJECT: Tax Forfeited Property - Nelson Hills Farm ih Addition Outlot A Parcel along 2nd Street at the terminus of Walnut Street DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION IDISCUSSION In 1998, the ih Addition of the Nelson Hills Farm Development was platted. Outlot A, Nelson Hills Farm ih Addition, was to be dedicated to the City of Farmington by the developer for stormwater ponding purposes (PID# 14-50506-010-00). However, the developer never deeded the 1.11 acre outlot to the City. Property taxes have not been paid on the outlot and the property is now in a state of tax forfeiture. The property is designated to be sold by auction under the tax forfeiture process as Specified in Minnesota Statues Chapter 282. The City now needs to obtain Outlot A from the State of Minnesota for the continued use as a stormwater ponding facility. See Exhibit A. Also in a state of tax forfeiture there is a 0.4 acre parcel along 2nd Street at the west end of Walnut Street in downtown Farmington (PID# 14-03100-030-63). This property is currently owned by the State of Minnesota and is designated to be sold by auction under the tax forfeiture process as Specified in Minnesota Statues Chapter 282. The City of Farmington would like to acquire this property for future public use. See Exhibit B BUDGET IMPACT None at this time. The tax forfeited properties would be acquired at no cost to the City. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution. 1) Adopt the attached resolution authorizing acquisition of Outlot A in the ih Addition of Nelson Hills Farm. 2) Adopt the attached resolution authorizing acquisition of .04 acres along 2nd Street at the terminus of Walnut Street. Re. spect~ful SUbm.. itted, ~~) c;/!e~ Jennifer ollova Natural Resource Specialist cc: file RESOLUTION NO. R -06 RESOLUTION REGARDING TAX FORFEITURE PROPERTY Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 st day of August 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, the City has been informed by the County that property legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" (PID# 14-50506-010-00), has been designated to be sold at auction under the tax forfeiture process specified in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 282; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Farmington does hereby determine that it is necessary and for a public use and purpose to acquire said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota: 1. That the City Administrator or his designees is authorized to notify the County of the City's intent to acquire said property and; 2. That the Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the acquisition of the property interests. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21 st day of August 2006. Mayor day of 2006. Attested to the City Administrator SEAL ~h,'oa A ""'\ ~f / PT Form 962 (Revised 10/11/96) Staple All Correspondence Minnesota Department of Revenue Application by a Governmental Subdivision for Conveyance of Tax-Forfeited Lands for an Authorized Public Use (Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivisions la through Ie) (Note: If the governmental subdivision has purchased the property, use PT Form 80) In Dakota County Name of governmental subdivision (applicant): City of Farmington Mailing address of applicant: 325 Oak Street Farmington. MN 55024 Date requested property wasforfeited to the State: August (month) 26, (day) 2004 (year) I Legal description of property (include the name of the city/town in which the property is located): City of Farmington Nelson Hills Farm 7th Addition Outlot A SW1/4 SE1/4 Section 14 Township 114 Range 20 14-50506-010-00 Describe the intended public use to be made of the propelty (be specific, including statute or specia11aw references, if relevant): LOCAtion of pllblic infrastructure State the need for the property (be specific, e.g., why this property instead of some other property?): Outlot is already being used as a stormwater ponding facility Please check the appropriate boxes below: o correcting governmental subd. name and/or o legal description original deed no. (If recorded, please supply recording information. If not recorded, please return the original state deed.) o There are one or more wells on this property [!] There are no wells on this property A Wetland Certification Form Must Be Attached To This Application Return application to: MN Department of Revenue' Property Tax Division' Mail Station 3340' St. Paul, MN 55146-3340 STATE OF MINNESOTA County of ) )ss. ) Being ftrst duly sworn, deposes and says that he/she is the authorized representative of the applicant named herein, that he/she has read said application and lmows the contents thereof, and that the matters stated therein are true and correct. Name Title Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ,20 Notary Public, County, Minn. My commission expires RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY BOARD UPON APPLICATION The County Board of County, Minnesota, has reviewed the application of dated , 20_, for the conveyance for an authorized public use of certain tax-forfeited land described therein. The county board recommends that this application be: rejected _ granted _ . Signature (for the County Board) Date CERTIFICATION OF COUNTY AUDITOR OR LAND COMMISSIONER I have taken the necessary steps required by Minnesota Statutes to prepare the herein described tax-forfeited land for conveyance for an authorized public use. Signature of County Auditor or Land Commissioner filte OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE St. Paul, Minn., , 20 Upon due consideration of this application, it is ordered that it is hereby: rejected _ granted_. Commissioner of Revenue By EY-hib,+ B - \ SITE MAP 2006 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES (PAYABLE 2007) 2006 BUILDING INFORMATION (PAYABLE 2007): NO DATA AVAILABLE PROPERTY 10 NUMBER: 14-505lJ6..010-00 ~-~ ' l.- lR: PAYABLE 2006 TAXES (DELINQUENT TAXES IN PAST YEARS) NETTAX: 0.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: 0.00 TOTAL TAX & SA: 0.00 PAYABLE 2007 ASMNT USAGE:EXEMPT CJ STATEOFMN-FTAX 1590 HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 LAND: 17,200 BUILDING: TOTAL: 17,200 SCHOOL DISTRICT: 192 LOT SIZE (EXCLUDES ROAD EASEMENTS) 48,201 SQ FT 1.11 ACRES LOCATION: SW1/4 SE1/4 SECTION 14-114-20 PAYABLE 2007 HOMESTEAD STATUS: . NON HOMESTEAD WATERSHED DISTRICT: VERMILLION RIVER LAST QUALIFIED SALE: DATE:. AMOUNT: OeD l] D W N.;mensions rounded to.ne:t foot PLAT NAME: NELSEN HillS FARM 7TH ADD TAX DESCRIPTION: OUTLOT A N ! Copyright 2006, Dakota County - This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information and data localed in various city, county, and state offices and other sources, affecting the area shown, and is 10 be used for reference purposes only. Dakota County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. If discrepancies are found, please contact Dakota County Survey and Land Information Department \, Map Date: May 16, 2006 Parcels Updated: 511112006 Aerial Photography: 2002 RESOLUTION NO. R -06 RESOLUTION REGARDING TAX FORFEITURE PROPERTY Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21st day of August 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, the City has been informed by the County that property legally described on the attached Exhibit "B" (PID# 14-03100-030-63), has been designated to be sold at auction under the tax forfeiture process specified in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 282; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Farmington does hereby determine that it is necessary and for a public use and purpose to acquire said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota: 1. That the City Administrator or his designees is authorized to notify the County of the City's intent to acquire said property and; 2. That the Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the acquisition of the property interests. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21 sl day of August 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of 2006. City Administrator SEAL ./' t:.)'\'n', b', -t b PT Form 962 (Revised 10/11/96) Staple All Correspondence Minnesota Department of Revenue Application by a Governmental Subdivision for Conveyance of Tax-Forfeited Lands for an Authorized Public Use' (Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivisions la through Ie) (Note: If the governmental subdivision has purchased the property, use PT Form 80) In Dakota County Name of governmental subdivision (applicant): r.iry of F~rmingtop Mailing address of applicant: 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Date requested property was forfeited to the State: All Ell ~ r (month) 26, (day) 2003 (year) Legal description of property (include the name of the city/town in which the property is located): Section 31, Township 114, Range 19 in the City of Farmington PT Depot grounds of former CMSTP&P Railroad in section 31 com NE corner Lot 7 Block 5 in original Town of Farmington North on northerly ext of East line Lot 7 120ft to PT of BEG with PARR North line Lot 775ft to PT 50ft easterly of & PARR with C/L Railroad northerly on PARR line 300ft easterlyperpendicular to said PARR line 60ft thence southerly & PARR C/L Railroad 230ft to PT pn northerly ext of East line Lot 7 South 60ft to PT of BEG 14-03100-030-63 Describe the intended public use to be made of the propelty (be specific, including statute or spe~ia1law references, if relevant): Mllnirip~l p~rkinE lot - public infrastructure State the need for the property (be specific, e.g., why this property instead of some other property?): Proximity to rh~ downro~n Rrp~ Please check the appropriate boxes below: D correcting governmental subd. name and/or o legal description original deed no. (If recorded, please supply recording information. If not recorded, please return the original state deed.) o There are one or more wells on this property []I There are no wells on this property A Wetland Certification Form Must Be Attached To This Application Return application to: MN Department of Revenue' Property Tax Division' Mail Station 3340' St. Paul, MN 55146-3340 IIII"':"TATE OF MINNESOTA County of ) )ss. ) Being fIrst duly sworn, deposes and says that he/she is the authorized representative of the applicant named herein, that he/she has read said application and lmows the contents thereof, and that the matters stated therein are true and correct. Name Title Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ,20 Notary Public, County, Minn. My commission expires RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY BOARD UPON APPLICATION The County Board of County, Minnesota, has reviewed the application of dated , 20_, for the conveyance for an authorized public use of certain tax-forfeited land described therein. The county board recommends that this application be: rejected _ granted _ . Signature (for the County Board) Date CERTIFICATION OF COUNTY AUDITOR OR LAND COMMISSIONER I have taken the necessary steps required by Minnesota Statutes to prepare the herein described tax-forfeited land for conveyance for an authorized public use. Signature of County Auditor or Land Commissioner llite OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE St. Paul, Minn., , 20 Upon due consideration of this application, it is ordered that it is hereby: rejected _ granted_" Commissioner of Revenue By SITE MAP 2006 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES (PAYABLE 2007) PROPERTY 10 NUMBER: 14-031(J()..()30-63 QER:' LAND: BUILDING: TOTAL: SCHOOL DISTRICT: STATE OF MN - F TAX 1590 HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 PAYABLE 2006 TAXES .(DELlNQUENT TAXES IN PAST YEARS) NET TAX: 0.00 SPECiAl ASSESSMENTS:' 0.00 TOTAl TAX & SA: 0.00 PAYABLE 2007 ASMNT USAGE: EXEMPT LOCATION: NE1/4 SW1/4 SECTION 31-114-19 21,600 21,600 192 LOT SIZE (EXCLUDES ROAD EASEMENTS) 17,297 SQ FT 0.40 ACRES E1.hO,bi+ g-I 2006 BUILDING INFORMATION (PAYABLE 2007): NO DATA AVAILABLE PAYABLE 2007 HOMESTEAD STATUS: . NON HOMESTEAD WATERSHED DISTRICT: VERMILLION RIVER LAST QUALIFIED SALE: DATE: . AMOUNT: ..J o OC:J o CJ (' ~.._..J J o o n II r---1 N.imensions rounded t~ nearest foot. Copyright 2006, Dekota County- This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, infonnation and data located in various city, county, and state offices and other sources, affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. Dakota County is not responsibla for any inaccuracies herein contained. If discrepancies ara found, please contact Dakota County Survey and Land Information Department. Map Date: May 16, 2006 Parceis Updated: 511112006 Aerial Photography: 2003 D~ DO o ~ ot:J r'l PLAT NAME: TAX DESCRIPTION: j lr-= .{]- DGJCJ DI .,-----, n SECTION 31 TWN 114 RANGE 19 PT DEPOT GROUNDS OF FORMER CMSTP&P RR IN SEC 31 COM NE COR LOT 7. BLK 5 IN ORIG TOWN OF FARMINGTON N ON N'L Y EXT OF E LINE LOT 7 120 FT TO PT OF BEG W PARR N LINE LOT 7 75 FTTO PT 50 FT E'L Y OF & PARR W CJL RR N'L Y ON PARR LINE 300 FT E'L Y PERPENDICULAR TO SAID PARR LINE 60 FT THENCE S'L Y & PARR CIL RR 230 FT TO PT ON N'L Y EXT OF E LINE LOT 7 S 60 FTTO PT OF BEG 3111419 N t City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us <?~ FROM: Mayor, Councilmembers, City AdministratoB Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director TO: SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Wine License and Intoxicating Malt Liquor License DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to City Ordinance 3-12-6-2, a public hearing must be held to issue an On-Sale Wine License and Intoxicating Malt Liquor license. DISCUSSION Ted's Pizza, Inc. located at 18450 Pilot Knob Road has submitted the required license fees and applications for an On-Sale Wine license and Intoxicating Malt Liquor license. . The applications and required documentation have also been reviewed and approved by the Police Department. BUDGET IMPACT Fees are included in the revenue estimates of the 2006 budget. ACTION REQUESTED Approve an On-Sale Wine License and On-Sale Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for Ted's Pizza, Inc., 18500 Pilot Knob Road. Respectfully submitted, ~d.JAad~ Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us <?/; TO: \~U Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator (jj Date Filed: May 6, 2006 Date Complete: Deadline Date: FROM: Lee Smick, AICP City Planner SUBJECT: Approve Grading CUP ISD 192 DATE: August 21,2006 INTRODUCTION ISD #192 has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to begin grading the high school site as soon as the grading plan is approved by the City's Engineering Department (Exhibit A). Section 3-22-5 of the City Code requires an application for a Conditional Use Permit to mine, excavate, or grade material within the City limits. Section 3-22-5 (A) of the City Code provides, in part, that: An application for a mine or excavation permit shall be processed in accordance with the same procedures and requirements... relating to conditional use permits. However, the hearing shall be held by the city council following a review and recommendation from the planning commission. The proposed grading operation will entail the balancing of 800,000 cubic yards of soil in order to avoid importing or exporting fill (Exhibits B-F). Temporary sediment and erosion control and post- closure storm water management are an improvement over the existing cropland runoff and drain tile discharge that currently occurs on the site. The grading of the site to its final form will provide permanent water quality benefits to the Vermillion River Watershed. The proposed plan shows the conversion of cropland to approximately 31.6 acres of impervious surface, 4.7 acres of storm water management ponds, 7.2 acres of grassland, and 66.5 acres oflandscaping and lawns including athletic fields. The grading plan shows three storm water ponds, one located on the south side of the site (basin 1) , one on the east side of the site adjacent to Flagstaff Avenue (basin 2), and one located off-site (basin 3) on property currently owned by Donnelly Farms Limited Partnership (Exhibit G). The School District is currently in negotiations with the property owner to discuss the possibility of obtaining easements for the pond property. The School District understands that these negotiations need to be finalized in order for grading to begin on the site. The City will accept a Grading CUP application with the property owner's signature on the application, signifying its approval of grading on the property. Based upon discussions with the School District as of August 16th, the District anticipates the application will be signed and ready for review by the City Council at its meeting on August 21 st. If an agreement cannot be reached for the pond to be located off-site, a new grading plan will need to be designed. The signature of the property owner on the application for the Grading CUP will be a condition of approval by the City Council along with the approval of the grading plan by the Engineering Department. . ACTION REQUESTED Approve the Grading CUP contingent upon the following: 1. The signature of the property owner where basin 3 is located is included on the application for the Grading CUP. 2. The applicant must obtain final City approval of the mining operation and the rough grading plan from the City Engineer. 3. The applicant must pay any applicable fees, provide adequate surety in an amount and form approved by the Director of Public Works, and comply with any other reasonable conditions imposed by the Director of Public Works. 4. All excavation activities must be consistent with plans submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works. Respectfully Submitted, / ~ (' // flk~ ~JL~ Lee Smick, AICP City Planner cc: Dr. Brad Meeks, ISD #192 Superintendent Donnelly Farms Limited Partnership Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator File fT;\ L~ ~f~1,j)}L:. r,(\ \ t.i,;Y 2 62006 j '...., \_~ L------~-..--'-'-" , I City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us ~---'-" ex. A II CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION II Applicant: DOUGLAS L. BONAR Telephone: (651) 463-5062 Address: 421 WALNUT STREET, Street FARMINGTON, City Fax: (651) 463-5041 MN State 55024 Zip Code Owner: IND. SCH. DIST. #192 Telephone: (651) 463-5062 Fax: (651) 463-5041 Address: 421 WALNUT STREET, Street FARMINGTON, City MN State 55024 Zip Code 'remises Involved: NtvJ fMIN~ fJ.d ,- ~ee It,T/rtftJUeAlT- Address/Legal Description (lot, block, plat name, section, township, range) Current Zoning District: A-I R-l Current Land Use: Urban Reserve Public / Semi-Public Specific Nature of Request: GRADING AND MINING OPERATIONS _Approved _Approved division: Date: OliOS €x. 8 ::J--- ---I s~o" =- . --- ---- \'lou.~{'\'tl1: ~viV': ..~...~-::- lOOH8~ .~?~~ ~?~8~.1~_~.:v~ 1 --::::,-,,:: I L ~ "tlJ..stJ.O:l 'l:IO~ l-O~ :;;:.-=.- :vEV::: :..;:;:' _0 ,~;(. -, dnoj~'iia ~ G . ~ ~~ .. ~~ OU >-Cl pi! .. ~ z '-Aid ". I ~~ ~ L ,- ! --= o' cO'" =.... . '"": . . =" . I ...o~ ".V.r:v .__. ",.s H81H NO.l8NIl^J~; n'~'~~ lOOH:lS _ N\fld 9NIO H.LnOS L ,et. ~ 'ti,l..$~O:l 'dO~ )..ON ~'S=. --.;:;,... ..~=!; VrY'" ~;:;:,.. ~.",,-- 8. -d~~9rn e t't I >- oJ Z o ~... u..o, ~=! OU >-Cl o:::~ <to ~~ ~Cl oJ- WO::: 0:::0 Il.u.. ~~ ;! .' ~:~ t~' I ;<' ~, :r . - '.. ~f ~;. , :1;"- Ii? "'i=rj.. --. ........ ",- ~-_.... - l':: Ii ; ?; ~;; L .-1 \.5,,",0';) 't30:!. 1.0'" ='$;;...-..... ..~.::;S; -vrv- ~:.~ to ~ " 'at I ~ r -11-- ------- ~ --------- 1';:;1 ------- -- : t-:: 'I - - - I ex. F lOOH:::>S H81H NO.lE)NIVIJ~\f~ N\fld DNIO'vClD -~ dn~"5'ii'o ~ r~--------------------------- I . 1)( I Iii IW IJ: I III 10 II- :..rffi::: ~.: . :::- I lip 11 .-' IQ:: ih[ I 1 I I I I \" II 'il ~ z o ..=.-. u.D.: ______n, ~=! : OU I >- C) I o:::?; I <(0 I :?;~ : ~C) _ -.::-,." :.: )".,- ~~ ffi ~ -~-----~T --l 0::0 : ,', c.. u. 1 ,. I I I 1 : I 1 , : I I I I I': .:: ::' :=:.}/! k t:: .. .J" I <~; I . ," / 'I '." /' I I . " " I ~.."..' :;< -+ - . I \ . I I ./ !~-~~ ;J:.,.,:; r~ r ~ , . : ~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.:'_'~,'~~'.lci;~': '- - ~/~:.. - -': ~~~'- ~ ~ - -f~ ' L ~ I) \ E~. 6r /I City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter J. Herlofsky, Jr. City Administrator SUBJECT: Supplemental Agenda DATE: August 21,2006 It is requested the August 21, 2006 agenda be amended as follows: AWARD OF CONTRACT 9a) Spruce Street Lighting - Engineering Award the Spruce Street Lighting Project to Wright Hennepin Electric with a low bid of $250,389.47. 7a.. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator ~ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer TO: SUBJECT: Award Contract - Spruce Street Extension Lighting DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION Bids were taken on Friday, August 18, 2006, for the lighting portion of the Spruce Street Extension Project. Four bids were received as shown on the attached bid summary. The items included in the bid includes the installation of the lights and a 15-year maintenance contract similar to the City's current arrangement with Xcel Energy in other areas of the downtown. The significant escalation in prices from Xcel have necessitated going out to bid for this work. BUDGET IMPACT The low base bid was submitted by Wright Hennepin Electric in the amount of $250,389.47. The installation part of the bid comes to $184,149.47. The maintenance contract, that would be billed pro-rated on a monthly basis, is in the amount of$66,240.00. The estimated installation cost from the feasibility report in September of 2004 for the lighting was $150,000. With the passage of almost two years and the documented increases in the costs of metals for construction, the bid received can be considered favorable. The Finance Director has confirmed the City's ability to fund the lighting based on the low bid received. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution accepting the base bid of Wright Hennepin Electric in the amount of $250,389.47 and awarding the lighting work and maintenance contract for the project. Respectfully submitted, ~M~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file RESOLUTION NO. R -06 AWARD BIDS FOR SPRUCE STREET LIGHTING PROJECT Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 SI day of August, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members present: Members absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Spruce Street Lighting Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Base Bid Amount Low Wright Hennepin Electric $250,389.47 #2 Collins Electrical Construction Co. $286,412.85 #3 Honda Electric, Inc. $317,148.82 #4 Electrical Installation & Maintenance Co., Inc. $345,832.90 ; and, WHEREAS, it appears the firm of Wright Hennepin Electric is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. The base bid of Wright Hennepin Electric in the amount of $250,389.47, is hereby accepted and awarded and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract therefore. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21 st day of August 2006. Mayor day of August, 2006. Attested to the City Administrator SEAL n Bonestroo -=- Rosene "I\lI Anderli/< & 1 \j 1 Associates Engineers & Architects 2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul, MN 55113 Office: 651-636-4600 . Fax: 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com August 18, 2006 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Re: Spruce Street Extension- Street Lighting Project File No. 000141:-03207-1 Bid Results Bids were opened for the Project stated above on Friday, August 18, 2006 at 10:00 A.M. Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Bid Tabulation for your information and file. Copies will also be distributed to each Bidder. There were a total offour Bids. The following summarizes the results of the Bids received: Low #2 #3 #4 Contractor Wright Hennepin Electric Collins Electrical Construction Co. Honda Electric, Inc. Electrical Installation & Maint~nance Co., Inc. Base Bid $250,389.47 $286,412.85 $317,148.82 $345,832.90 - The low Bidder on the Project was Wright Hennepin Electric with a base bid of $250,389.47. Of this amount, $184,149.47 was for the installation of the lighting units and $66,240.00 was for a IS-year maintenance agreement for the same lighting units. The maintenance agreement is structlired to require the Contractor to invoice the City for maintenance of the lighting units at a fixed monthly rate for the next 15 years. This is similar to the current agreement that the City has with Xcel Energy for the downtown street lights. The Feasibility Report, prepared in September of 2004, provided an estimate of $150,000 for the street lighting portion of the Project. Since the time of the Report, prices of steel for the lighting units and prices of copper for the electrical wiring have increased significantly. These price increases are reflected in the Bids received last Friday. All Bids received were reviewed and were found to be in order. If the City Council wishes to award the Project to the low Bidder, then Wright Hennepin Electric should be awarded the Project on the Base Bid Amount of $250,389.47. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (651) 604-4760. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INe. ~~ f?~~ Kevin P. Kielb, P.E. Enclosure St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN . Milwaukee, WI . Chicago, IL Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned 13 ctl >< Ql t: ctl .!:2 '" ;s co :5 f Ql U ~ e Ql .c: "ti ~ 'a; u e ~ :c ..... o t: .0 ts ' .g e Q. e ..- ~ o N M 9 :; ..- o o o .... u o Z .!!! u: ~ c: 3: o .E E ::i Qi Ql ... en ~ <( o o o ..- ro to o o N as ..- Ui ::l ::l <( c: o 'iij c: Ql .... >< w Qi Ql ... en Ql CJ ::l ... ell "0 'c: l.L. i::i> c: '1:: Q) 0. o "0 CD en a; E ell Z o Q) '0' a: o Z o Q) '0' a: c .'l:1 C3 o ~ aJ : 0... v....." ..... OJ := I'\j - ..... c: ~'u :s ~~'tJ~< o 0 c: VI .." c:lo:::cCcC ::: ~=~l all c: .2 ~ ~ c;;8 vU)Q) o.E g ~~~ Q).i: C1J "Cu~ "0 Ql 'ili Ciw~ CJ .E CJ ';: MO o Ql zw ... co Ql"O :g c: ._ 0 a:I:r: c;; 0 .g U NO.2 ci~"" zwCJ ... III .E Ql .E III :g=c: ._ 0 0 a:lUU CJ .;: o Ql ijj c: 'Q. Ql c: .c: o Ql z:r: ;~ "0 OJ "C Oi: CiS: z o ~ ...J => a:I <( I- C iii c;; '0 I- 000000000 OLOOO","OOOO O...rOaiNNcOOO ONOo:lCl","ClLOO oOO..-o:lOO..-O oaiLriaSaS-<iriri- c;; '0 I- NOOOOOOOO o:lLOOOOL!:lOOO "":...rON~MOOO L!:lNOLO","I"-L!:lOO ClOL!:lN.....O"'"tOO r-: ai to - c;; '0 I- 0L!:l0000000 OL!:lONO.....OOO oNo...rui-iouio O':lO'lO.,....OvOJO.....- ","M","tO..-NLONN riLriLriOO-<iNNri vq.T"'"EA-NT""'V'7f;R-U7f#7 <h <h <h Ql CJ .;: c.. OLOOOLOL!:lOOO O","","I"-NOLOOO ci~ui~~r=c::iuici Q')U7~EA-Et7~bl7"C"'""""" "'" MN ri <hri <h <h .... '2 => c;; '0 I- O","otOtotOOOO tOtOOOI"-.....ooo N,....:cic:ju-5~~..nN OClO"'"..... to LO tOto o:ltOtOClNOlMMo:l CJ:)-ML!')-~ciMri~N ..........<hN<h<h<h<h<h <h <h <h Ql CJ .;: c.. .... '2 => OtOO....."'"o:lLOOO tOCltOo:l.....OltOOO NC'ia.c:i~~ocitriN O<h<h<h<h<h<hCltO o:l ..-o:l to <hN ..... <h <h ~ o ,... moc.o V NOr---..... LOONo:l","tO v 0,...00""" M.....No:l"'"LO ..- ~ 'C => ~ =>(/) I- I- I- I- I- I- I I l.L.l.L.l.L.l.L.l.L.l.L.UU ~~~~~~~<(WW<( 3...J...J...J...J...J...J ...J 000000 000000 0000000 00","00<h LOOlo:lLOo:l <h ' . . . L!:lt-LOC'? r---N~'l"""" <h <h <h 000000 000000 00000"": OOo:lL!:lO<h L!:lC'?","LOtO <hNri<h<h <h <h 000000 000000 000000 OOOOLOO OL!:lo:lotON ..-'NNr-:NLri U7COMEt7T'"""~ <h <h <h 000000 000000 000000 0000L!:lL!:l OL!:l..-I"-LOtO ~N..::t"WI7EA-Vt7 <h <h <h 000000 000000 oooouio NOl","LOl"-tO "'"L!:l00l1"-..... ~Cf"jO~aiN <hl"-M<h<h<h <h <h 000000 000000 oouiuiuio NC'?LOClNI"- ","NI"-","","N ~ N- ri EI7 Et7 Et7 <h <h <h 0L!:l0000 OONOOO 000 ui uiuio LOCl.....t-OO NMLOtOO"," <h ' , . , , N","","OM tON<h..-<h <h <h <h OLOOOOO Oo:l","LOOO oo...r~uiui LOCltOtOMN No:lO","",""," EA-~MEI7tA-~ <h <h .....Mo:lOMo:l M ..-N IIIIII UUUUUU <(<(<(<(<(<( WWWWWW 000 OOal c:i~N 0) <h M a:l 00 cri .n N "'" ...- M ~ .... Cl all O~ C:uClL!:l ~.E~LO g,q,OZ","LO i9'-'C::~",""," "'Q)>-,I"-I"- 1: g "E .!: rr '? roell::l.!:!lOlCl ucOQ..I"-I"-c: 'C:~U Q)"'""'"'Q)- .....c::o---- g 'm a:l g.[3 [3 ~ a.: W~~~!::::.!::::.:<> 00 00 O~ 0) <h ex) cri N ...- ~ OON 0000 000:) 00"'" 00.... lri a:l'''': LO <h .... ~ M .... u.!!!1"- c:ULO _.: ("") uULO ,_ LO .l:: c: uQ)Z .!!!.!!2~ W ,'l:1 . ellZO "OLO::: c:: '" ~ 000 ILO...J 00 00 cio 00 00 lriaS LO <h ~ 001l) 0000 ~ON MO .... t-LO"," cri <h <D" 0) 00 ~ N .... MO M I"- "'"1"-.>0< o:la:lell cX,eb1::!"E ClCla.Q) "'""'"Q)"O MM"t::-tii tOtO::l(!) I"-I"-~a: ... Q) .J::. U t; E "'fficia;U:;C")cn~ .gU~LOMLO&... u 5U5z~8 . ~ .!!!:;::Q)~..tNIii5 Wgro-""NOl.J::.ell u)\-_:::lNNQ)QJ .f: iii (/) ell ~ ~ c: t: o~~~U;~a1a.. UUN(/)~~~> 00 00 ~o MO r-L!:l cri<h 0) b'7 00,... 00"'" cioai "'"000 N..-M cri<hci to Il) b'7 N .... u 'C: o Q) M WQ)~ .5 oe: ~ 0.0 Q) U Z E:S~ Q) u . I.!!!"E ::EW..g 010.>0< 'C: as g S:toC:: in '" ~ "0 "0 <( "0 c: ell Q) E ell Z 00 00 cio ","0 ('oj..... cD<h to b'7 ~~ =>=> (/)(/) a.Q.. ~~ =>=> ...J ...J .... o U ~ C o U I- ~"'"tOa:l~ ~ 00000 ~ WW ZZZZZ U ~~ ~~~~~ W ...J~~ 1-00000 '-' ......w 5UUUUU:> w~1- 0..-..-..-.......- c:: WWS2z ZOWWWWW ~ .....N(/)ti;...J:< c::c::c::c::c:: 0 !:P~~Z~~ ~~~~~~ ~W ~~I-~<(~ 6 '-' 0 W~ ~I-IU;C::Z c::C ~oooo ~z I-I-~WO~ I-iii ~~55555 m6zzz~OGI Zw ~l-wOOOOOw~~o=>=>w~zS2~~~ 0<( C::C::C::C::C::...J ~~~I- <(...JU'-'<( iii~~~~~~~o~~<(zz~~w~<(~a:I w~~ffiffiffiffiffi6:>=>~~~U~~~~~~ enmzooooozc::O=>IIzIQ~Z<(1- <1:0, zzzzz<(wC::o~~O~C::,j,Oc::O ~~N=>=>~=>=>I(/)~l.L.~~u~m~UI-I- E ~ E E Ql ::l :::z ~NM-.::tL{)c.or---COO')~ T"""NM~Lf')c.o T""" T""" T""" T""" T""" "If""" I"- ..... ai u .~ 01 Q) .f: .>0< 1"-0 (/)Qiu ~gst::iii~~ ~'? ~8~u ~::::aliiicl:l'~ Cl "'" ::l, Q) ~~ellU"':r: o M'c . Q) '" (!) otOoQ..roellC a:l!::::.(/)>(/)uO .. )( .. .. Q) ell >- Q) 5l.L.m~ .J::. "01- a. (!) c: 01 Ci5 "0 c: o m (!) 32 c: mO "0 c: o m Q) 32 c: mO "0 C o m Q) 32 c: mO ..- r:- ce >.-0 :c~ ::l"O g.!!! (/) 3: "0 0 ._ C ce.>o< u <( ell "0 c: Q) "0 -0 <( l- ce ..- I"- o N M o ..... "" ..... o o o City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us lOa... TO: Mayor and Councilmembers @' FROM: Peter J. Herlofsky, Jr. City Administrator SUBJECT: Economic Growth Committee DATE: August 21,2006 DISCUSSION This request was made to the City Council at their August 7, 2006 meeting. Please note the attachment has placed the Economic Development Authority (EDA) as the coordinating agency. Attached is also an organizational chart showing the relationship. rfthere are any questions, please give me a call. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt a resolution accepting a proposal to create an Economic Growth Committee between the City ofParmington and the Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce - Farmington. CMuller/Herlofsky/Council Memos/Economic Growth Com RESOLUTION NO. R_-06 ACCEPTING A PROPOSAL TO CREATE AN ECONOMIC GROWTH COMMITTEE BETWEEN THE CITY OF FARMINGTON AND THE NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - FARMINGTON Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 st day of August 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: PROPOSAL: The formation of a new jointly recognized entity by the City Council of the City of Farmington and the Farmington Business Council of Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce to herein be referred to as the Economic Growth Committee. PURPOSE: The Economic Growth Committee is an advisory body to the City Council Economic Development Authoritv (EDA) for the purpose of assisting in appropriate efforts to expand the tax base and increase job opportunities. FACTORS: The Farmington Area Business Council identifies economic development and redevelopment as a high priority and an important function for the economic well being ofthe City of Farmington, and The Farmington Area Business Council believes it is important to work cooperatively with the City of Farmington and the townships of Castle Rock, Empire and Eureka developing a public/private sector partnership for the economic growth effort of the Farmington area, and The Farmington Area Business Council believes the Economic Growth Committee shall be a resource in assisting the City Council and city staff in addressing various economic growth issues, and The Farmington Area Business Council believes the Economic Growth Committee shall be involved in the strategic planning process as it relates to economic development and redevelopment, and H:\RESOLUTI\2006 Resolutions\Economic Growth Committee 8-21-06.doc pjh The Farmington Area Business Council believes the Economic Growth Committee shall continue for a period as long as the City Council of the City of Farmington and the Farmington Area Business Council ofthe Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce shall deem necessary. MISSION: The Farmington Area Business Council recognizes the mission of the Economic Growth Committee is as follows: h Receive input from and provide recommendations to the City Council EDA 2. Act as a sounding board for development and redevelopment projects 3. Assist in strategic planning and marketing for the City of Farmington 4. Serve as a working committee with the ability to form task forces and special committees to accomplish goals and objectives 5. Take pulse of the community with regard to image and retention of businesses. GOALS: The Farmington Area Business Council recognizes the Economic Growth Committee shall develop goals as follows: 1. Consistent with those established by the City Council 2. Take a proactive approach to city economic development and redevelopment 3. Provide employment opportunities, continued retention of jobs and enhancement of the tax base 4. Actively promote research, development and redevelopment of office/industrial parks 5. Promote research, development and redevelopment of historic downtown Farmington 6. Recognize the importance of the retail sector to the overall economic well being of the City of Farmington WORK PLAN: The Farmington Area Business Council recognizes the Economic Growth Committee shall establish an annual Work Plan that will be submitted to the EDA and the City Council and Farmington Area Business Council for approval. MEMBERSHIP: The Farmington Area Business Council recognizes the Economic Growth Committee will consist of fourteen (14) select members who are either residents of or do business in the Farmington area. Seven members will be appointed by the City Council and seven members will be appointed by the Farmington Area Business Council of Northern Dakota County Chambers of Commerce. Members will be appointed by the following categories and count: Category Financial Institution Development Landowner Business Owner Utilities Education City Council Member Business Council Member At Large/Townships City 1 1 1 1 o 1 1 o 1 H:\RESO LUTI\2006 Resolutions\Economic Growth Committee 8-21-06.doc pjh Chamber 1 1 1 1 1 o o 1 1 Appointments made to the Committee shall be for a three year term with a maximum continual service of three three-year terms or a total of nine years. The appointment and term of "Council Member" and "Business Council Member" categories shall be at the discretion of the City Council and Farmington Area Business Council respectively. Interim replacements shall be appointed by the appropriate Council and shall fill the term of the resigning member. The City Administrator or his/her designee and Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce President shall serve as ex-officio members of the Economic Growth Committee. FINANCES: Funding for the Economic Growth Committee will be budgeted by the City Council, Economic Development Authority and/or Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce. Standard financial and expenditure procedures will be followed according to the funding source and policies of the funding source. OFFICERS: A Chair and Vice Chair shall be elected by a majority vote of the Committee membership. The Chair and Vice Chair will serve one-year terms with a three year limit on successive terms. WORKING COMMITTEES/TASK FORCES: Any and all working committees and Task Forces shall be formed by consensus of the Committee. Any member of the Economic Growth Committee may serve on such Committees/Task Forces. Chairpersons of such groups shall be appointed by the Chair of the Economic Growth Committee. Any appropriate non-Economic Growth Committee members may be appointed by the Chair of the Committee/Task Force. SPECIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCES/STUDIES: Membership on Special Economic Development Task Forces/Studies shall consist of appointments by appropriate parties to ensure balanced representation. Representative No. Appointed Bv: City Council 1 City Council Business Council 1 Business Council Planning Commission 1 Planning Commission At Large/Township 1 City Council EGC 1 EGC Chair EGC Chair 1 EGC Chair Ex-officio staff of the city and chamber If appropriate the following: Parks & Rec 1 Affected Parties max= 4 Parks and Rec Director Identified and selected by EGC Chair and approved by City Council The Chair of the Economic Growth Committee shall serve as Chairperson of such Special Economic Development Task Force/Studies. If a conflict is apparent regarding the appointments of any members, the City Council shall have the final decision. H:\RESOLUTI\2006 Resolutions\Economic Growth Committee 8-21-06.doc pjh REPORTING: A report will be provided annually to the EDA and City Council of the City of Farmington and Farmington Area Business Council. NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Economic Growth Committee shall continue and carry out the responsibilities herein contained. Passed and duly adopted this day of by the Farmington Area Business Council of the Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce. XXX, Chair, Farmington Area Business Council ATTEST: Ruthie Batulis, President, Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21 st day of August 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of 2006. City Administrator SEAL H:\RESOLUTI\2006 Resolutions\Economic Growth Committee 8-21-06.doc pjh . . . City Of Farming!Qrr Economic Development Structure II Proposal .' " "\ City of Fa~rmington City Council II II I, '1 ;- ;;, jl ~ '.-,," City Administrator ,-.. '- ./ II 11 ""\ Economic Development Authority (EDA) II .J . ~~. ~" A.. -' ,,\~, 'Corn,munity Development ,', : ., ~ -. t" !'-.- Department . ~;~i,t'" ; , -. . .... '". " ~'" '. _.' " II .......... II Economic Growth Committee u \. II City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us lOb TO: Mayor, Council Members, \~l./ City Administrator (j FROM: Lee Smick, AICP City Planner Date Filed: July 21,2006 Date Complete: August 3, 2006 60-Day Deadline Date: October 3, 2006 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - ISD 192 Preliminary and Final Plat DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION Independent School District #192 has submitted a preliminary and final plat application (Exhibit A) for the Farmington Area High School to be located at 20655 Flagstaff Avenue. On August 8, 2006, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat with conditions (Exhibit B). At that same meeting, the Commissioners also unanimously approved the following applications: a Conditional Use Permit for a Public School in the R-1 Zoning District, a Site Plan Review, a Variance of 34 feet to the maximum height of a building in the R-1 Zoning District, a Variance of 64 square feet to the maximum size of a development project sign, and a Conditional Use Permit for Grading on the high school property. DISCUSSION On June 19, 2006, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Urban Reserve to Public/Semi-Public and rezoned the property from A-I (Agriculture) to R-I (Low Density Residential) for the 11 O-acre site west of Flagstaff Avenue and one third of a mile north of CSAH 50. At that meeting, the City Council also formally approved the extension of MUSA to the property. Additionally, the Metropolitan Council's 9-member Community Development Committee unanimously approved the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and MUSA Extension request for the new high school. The full 16-member Metropolitan Council will review the final approval of the Farmington Area High School Comprehensive Plan Amendment and MUSA extension on August 23, 2006. Farmin2ton Area Hi2h School Site Plan ISD #192 proposes to construct a public school in the R-1 zoning district. The new high school campus will encompass 1l0-acres, including a building of approximately 450,000-470,000 square feet, various sports facilities, and supporting infrastructure. Farm fields are currently located to the north, east, and south of the site, with a new housing subdivision currently being developed to the west. The proposed buildings, parking lots, and athletic facilities meet the requirements of the R-1 zoning district. The proposed campus consists of a three-story building and adjoining athletic fields and parking lots (Exhibits C-G). The building will be constructed initially for a capacity of 2,000 students in grades nine through twelve with the opportunity to expand the facility to meet the needs of 2,400 students in the future. The building construction will include concrete panels, brick, metal, and glass. The south side of the building will house the classrooms, science labs, and art studios. Gymnasiums will be located on the east end of the building, with a pool area located on the west side. Office areas, recital hall, and lecture hall will be located between the classroom area and gym area. Outside facilities include: two baseball fields, three softball fields, six football/soccer fields, eight tennis courts, an oval track at the perimeter of the football field, one track & field event area (west of the building), one physical education space and a football stadium. Sidewalks and Trails Sidewalks and trails are proposed by the School District throughout the campus. Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director, has submitted comments concerning the opportunities for additional trails on the school site (Exhibit H). Further discussions between Mr. Distad and the School District will occur concerning the recommendations, and any mutually acceptable revisions to the School District's original trail plan should be identified in connection with the City Council's approval of the plat. Parking The plan currently shows 972 parking spaces with 339 parking spaces shown for future construction (Exhibit I). The required number of parking spaces is 834, thereby meeting the requirements of the City code. Staff and student parking will be located east of the building, while visitors will have a separate parking lot located near the south public entrance. Bus loading areas will be provided on the south side of the building to allow students to travel between buses and the building without crossing vehicle lanes. The facility will comply with applicable ADA, safety code and energy use regulations and guidelines. Flagstaff Avenue - Construction/Traffic As part of the new high school project, Flagstaff Avenue will be upgraded and paved with bituminous material from CSAH 50 on the south to the Farmington city limits on the north. Two entrances from Flagstaff Avenue will provide access to the new high schooL The high school will generate an estimated 1,143 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour (7-8 a.m.) and 777 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour (2-3 p.m.). The School District will submit a traffic management plan to the City for managing vehicular traffic to and from the high school site. The School District will propose traffic control officers and attendants during peak hours of the day. This should be a condition of the plat approvaL An intersection at Flagstaff Avenue and 208th Street will be constructed in the future when development pressures require the east/west roadway. The future alignment for 208th Street is shown on Exhibit (J). This attachment is from the EA Wand was a part of the settlement agreement between the City and the School District. Services The sanitary sewer service to the new high school will extend from an existing Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sewer south of CSAH 50 north to the new high school and north to 200th Street (Exhibit K). The sewer extension will immediately serve the new high school and will be designed and sized to accommodate future development in the vicinity of the new high school. The City will construct and install water main from the intersection of CSAH 50 and Pilot Knob Road to the new high school's south entry way (Exhibit K). From the existing water main at CSAH 50 and Pilot Knob Road, the City will install a 16" main running west along the north side of CSAH 50 and an 18" main running north in the right-of-way of Flagstaff Avenue, per the requirements of Farmington's Water Supply Plan. Storm water ponds are proposed on the south and east sides of the site to handle runoff from the northwest. Landscape Plan The applicant submitted a revised Landscape Plan on August 8, 2006 (Exhibit L). The School District made an extensive revision to the original plan by incorporating Minnesota native plants rather than the proposed Columnar Maples and Honeylocusts that were in the first submission. The School District's landscape designer utilized the Minnesota DNR and Great River Greening Project's listing of native plant community species for Minnesota. Trees such as Red Cedar, Paperbirch, Northern Pin Oak, Black Walnut, and seedlings such as Ninebark, Red Dogwood, and Chokecherry are proposed in the revised plan. All areas north of the north service drive will be seeded with wild grasses, excluding the baseball and softball fields, which will be sodded with turf. All of the open spaces south of the north service drive will be sodded with turf. The outer limits of the site will also be seeded with wild grasses along with the basin areas. The proposed plantings meet the requirements of the City Code. Lighting The parking lot lighting and stadium lighting should be directed in a downward manner and spillage of the lighting onto neighboring properties should be prohibited. A lighting plan showing the lumens and spread of the lights in the parking lots and stadium will need to be submitted. This will be a condition of the approval of the plat. Farmine:ton Area Hie:h School Preliminary and Final Plat ISD#192 is proposing to combine two existing lots west of Flagstaff Avenue into one lot for a total of 110 acres (Exhibit M). As shown on Exhibit N, the north lot consists of 39.97 acres and the south lot consists of 70.03 acres. The plat shows two outlots consisting of storm water ponds (Exhibit M). Additionally, the water main will be dedicated to the City with a 20- foot wide utility easement. The plat also shows a 10- foot wide easement at the property lines, per City Code requirements. The School District will dedicate a 50-foot wide right-of-way for the future 208th Street alignment and a 60-foot wide right-of-way on Flagstaff Avenue. The grading plan proposes that some of the surface water and storm water will flow to an additional pond (basin 3) off-site of the School District's property (Exhibits O-S). A condition of the approval of the Farmington Area High School preliminary & final plat will be the dedication of basin 3 to the City. Basin 3 is located on property owned by Donnelly Farms Limited Partnership. It consists of 74.93 acres and is an Ag Preserve property (Exhibit N). ISD #192 staff have indicated that the School District is in the process of obtaining easements from these two property owners for the pond in question early next week. If an easement is secured for basin 3, the property owner (Donnelly Farms Limited Partnership) will be required to sign the final plat. Additionally, the two property owners may be required to apply for a variance to the minimum lot size in the A-I zoning district to allow the splitting of the two lots from the ponding area. Basin 3 will need to be addressed through the aforementioned easements before the Farmington Area High School preliminary & final plat is reviewed by the City Council. ACTION REQUESTED City staff recommends the following: Approve the attached resolution for the Farmington Area High School Preliminary & Final Plat contingent upon the following: 1. The identification of any revisions to the School District's original trail plan that are mutually acceptable to the City and the School District. 2. A lighting plan is submitted showing the lumens and spread of the lights for the parking lots and stadium ensuring that the lights do not spill onto adjacent properties. 3. The School District submits a traffic management plan to the City for managing vehicular traffic to and from the high school site. 4. The dedication of an easement to the City for basin 3. 5. The satisfaction of any engineering and planning comments. 6. The preparation and execution of the Development Contract and approval of the construction plans for grading, storm water and utilities by the Engineering Division. Respectfully Submitted, P.....>:tlr;<..;/~ ~ /,,;/ . . ../'; '. f-' . ... ( .... ,v' --' Lee Smick, AICP City Planner cc: Dr. Brad Meeks, ISD #192 Superintendent Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator File RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FARMINGTON AREA HIGH SCHOOL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 'Iday of August, 2006 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member _ introduced and Member _ seconded the following: WHEREAS, an application meeting City requirements has been filed seeking preliminary and final plat review and approval of the Farmington Area High School; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the preliminary and final plat on the 8th day of August, 2006, preceded by 10 days' published and mailed notice, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS; the City Council reviewed the preliminary and final plat on August 21, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be feasibly served by municipal service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above preliminary and fmal plat be approved and that the requisite signatures are authorized and directed to be affixed to the final plat with the following conditions: Approve the attached resolution for the Farmington Area High School Preliminary & Final Plat contingent upon the following: 1. The identification of any revisions to the School District's original trail plan that are mutually acceptable to the City and the School District. 2. A lighting plan is submitted showing the lumens and spread of the lights for the parking lots and stadium ensuring that the lights do not spill onto adjacent properties. 3. The School District submits a traffic management plan to the City for managing vehicular traffic to and from the high school site. 4. The dedication of an easement to the City for basin 3. 5. The satisfaction of any engineering and planning comments. 6. The preparation and execution of the Development Contract and approval of the construction plans for grading, storm water and utilities by the Engineering Division. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 2151 day of August, 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of August, 2006. City Administrator ~~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us O fC:? IN r2 0 '"0.17 r:-=-' .-~::-._-~ . I.S \b L5 \:!.J L13 I r<.,\. ...: ! r --."'1)1 L: . . AUG - 3 0nn.I~; ..1'.11 'Ii! , L,~,_.,: .;! I i I I 'Ud :." 1.1 .j! . L::;/ ;;;zfJ Owner: 'J:,~ I 'ff[~ .'L L/ Z j l)I X{v..c-( Street J-"J~ .jJt;--t l(Z I (jV1(/~.(j PLAT REVIEW APPLICATION Telephone: cbi7) '1111"" ijJ liO Fax: ~ 1~.")";)7J 6( J -Fir,eiWWf'r; /!Vi,J State ;JT' Applicant: City t))u2i/ Zip Code Address: Street , Telephone: ~ Lfft1'" 50(;0 Fax: ~ 1/(;1 fi7J'I I LJ"'- u . ~~. t1r(l;l@l~ ,.IN ~~~ -Z Ol.t~i- A11s)Yrff :/ht~ l-.1 IJf;;J If~tf 5?tf;juL Current Land Use ~ffq (yeli) Address: Location of Property: Address Current Zoning District Description of Project: g6L;Jti R'JJc Signature of Property Ower Date SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (please attach) o Names, Addresses and Phone numbers of all Owners o Names, Addresses and Phone numbers of Land Surveyor/Engineer o Area Bounded By Description o Total Gross Area PLAT REVIEW QPTION Preliminary & Final Plat: o Together o In Sequence Pre PI . strative urety $ o paid o paid &.~ 8-8-06 2) Recommend approval of the Farmington Area High School Preliminary & Final Plat contingent upon the following and forward the recommendation to the City Council: 1. The dedication of basin 3 to the City. et. fJ Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting August 8, 2006 1. Call to Order Chair Rotty called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Rotty, Barker, Fitzloff, Johnson, Larson Members Absent: None Also Present: Lee Smick, City Planner; Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner 2. Approval of Minutes a) July 11, 2006 MOTION by Johnson, second by Larson to approve the July 11, 2006 Minutes. Voting for: Rotty, Fitzloff, Johnson, Larson. Abstain: Barker. MOTION CARRIED. 3. Continued Business a) Findings of Fact - 621 Elm Street A conditional use permit was denied for Mr. Jason Stelter. The main issue in the Findings of Fact states that four of the criteria for approval of a CUP were not met. MOTION by Johnson, second by Larson to approve the Findings of Fact. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 4. Public Hearings a) ISD 192 - CUP for School in R-1 Zoning District, Preliminary and Final Plat, Variance to Building Height, Variance to Development Project Site - Grading CUP, Site Plan This is regarding the site for the new high school covering 110 acres along Flagstaff Avenue. The school district is proposing a three-story building with a capacity of 2000 students and in the future 2400 students. The school district has proposed a trail coming from Flagstaff and around the pond. The City shows additional trails along flagstaff, coming south from the school, a proposed trail along the south side of 208th Street and some trails within the soccer and baseball complex. Parks and Recreation Director Distad suggested a sidewalk along the private drive that will be extended along the west side of the high school and will connect to the future 208th Street to the bus corral. He also suggested showing additional trails on the site plan that are on exhibit A. They are required to have 834 parking spaces and currently they show 972 parking spaces and there are another 339 planned in the future. 208th Street is proposed to go north of the site. Flagstaff will be a paved road. A well-done landscape plan has been received. As far as the CUP, the proposed use meets the provisions of the R-1 zone, the proposed use will not cause any harmful conditions, however staff would like to see a lighting plan showing the spread of the lights at the football stadium and also the parking lot. The building and grounds are currently surrounded by farm Planning Commission Minutes August 8, 2006 Page 2 fields to the north, east, and south with housing being developed to the west which is in Lakeville. The project has been designed to be harmonious with the environment. It is proposed there will be 1100 trips during the weekday between 7 - 8 a.m. and 770 trips during the weekday between 2 - 3 p.m. Staff is asking as part ofthe Settlement Agreement a traffic management plan be prepared to determine the managing of the traffic. The school is proposing traffic control officers at the peak times. This is a condition of the permit. The use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Regarding the preliminary and final plat, the school district is working with the Donnelly's to secure an easement for the pond which is off site. This is a contingency of the preliminary and final plat. As far as the variance to the maximum height, currently 35 ft. is allowed in an R-1 zone. The school has a 55 ft. tall building at its highest point and beyond that there are two flues for the science classrooms that need to be 14 ft. tall and must be a certain distance away from any screening. The flues would be in the center of the building so there is no need for screening. The school is asking for a variance of34 ft. in the R-1 zone for a total height of 69 ft. The hardship is the building has to be condensed on the site to a three story building in order to meet the state requirements for facilities on the property. A variance for the maximum size of a development project sign is required because 32 sq. ft. is the maximum and the school is proposing 96 sq. ft. The school wants to provide as much information as possible for people passing by. Staff agreed the hardship is the public needs to be informed. Regarding the grading CUP, the Council will review this on August 21,2006. The Council will also make a motion on the EA W. If that passes, there is one more step for the full Met Council to approve it on August 23, 2006. The grading needs to be finalized and approved by the Director of Public Works. The earliest time they can get on the high school site is August 24, 2006. The biggest issue is the requirement of a signature for an easement by the property owners that own basin three for the grading CUP and they need to have the easement in hand by August 21, 2006. Staff recommended this be moved forward and make this a contingency of the grading CUP. The proposed plan shows a conversion of crop land to 31.6 acres of impervious surface, 4.7 acres of storm water management, 7.2 acres of grassland, and 66.5 acres oflandscaping and lawns. The action requested by staff is as follows: The Conditional Use Permit for a public school in an R-1 zoning district and the site plan is contingent on the following: - The recommendations by the Parks and Recreation Director are met. - A landscape plan is submitted and approved by the City Planner - A lighting plan is submitted showing the spread of lights for the parking lots and stadium to ensure the lights do not spill onto adjacent properties. - The school district submits a traffic management plan to the City for managing vehicular traffic during the peak periods and throughout the day. Staff will check on the timeline for this. Planning Commission Minutes August 8, 2006 Page 3 Approval of the Farmington Area High School Preliminary and Final Plat is contingent on the following: - Forwarding the recommendation to the City Council. - The dedication of basin three to the City through an easement. - Recommend approval ofa variance of34 ft. to the height of the proposed high school building in the R-1 zone meeting the hardship for condensing the building on the site. - Recommend approval of a variance of 64 sq. ft. for the maximum size of a development project sign because of the amount of information needed on the sign, contingent upon the following - all setback requirements for the R-1 zone are met when locating the sign. - Submit a positive recommendation to the City Council for its public hearing on August 21,2006 concerning the conditional use permit for grading the high school contingent upon the following - the signatures of the two property owners where basin three is located are included on the application for the grading CUP. Commissioner Barker asked the school district for their opinion of the additional trails recommended by the City. Mr. Bonar replied he has just seen the document within the last 24 hours and does not have an opinion yet. Commissioner Larson confirmed the sign variance is just for the construction sign, not the permanent sign. Chair Rotty stated it is common for City's to grant a CUP for a school in an R-l district. He would like to stay with the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Director and feels that can be worked out. He felt all the contingencies were reasonable. He was not uncomfortable with a three-story building. He supported the variance to the construction sign as long as it was placed with regard to safety. Commissioner Larson asked when Flagstaff would be upgraded. Mr. Doug Bonar replied there are still ongoing coordination meetings with the City and engineers. The portion immediately east of the school site would have the elevation radically changed this year. The remaining work on Flagstaff Avenue would occur in 2007. MOTION by Barker, second by Larson to close the public hearings. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Barker, second by Johnson to approve the CUP to construct a school in an R-l district with the contingencies. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Johnson, second by Barker to approve the preliminary and final plat with the contingency to obtain an easement for basin three. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Barker, second by Johnson to approve the height variance. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Planning Commission Minutes August 8, 2006 Page 4 MOTION by Larson, second by Fitzloffto approve the sign variance with the contingency that it meet all setbacks and be placed safely. The hardship is the size is necessary to inform the public. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Johnson, second by Barker to approve the grading CUP including the requirement of obtaining the easement for basin three. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. . CIJ I- Z Z 0 w i= :: u w w Cl Z <l: Z Z CIJ 0 <l: W U :: CIJ :: a: CIJ w ~ <l: I- <l: a: CIJ ". Cl >- ". <<l CIJ ~ Z ~ o ~ a: I- -l I- CIJ . CIJ W ~ClCIJ ". <<l~CIJ 5 CIJ~~ -' wClU LL o..-<l: U ~-' u:: c.. LL -' <l: W a: _ I- LL . CIJ W ~ i= Z :J 5 i= 0.. ::> CIJ Cl .... ClJCIJz w ~w~J:2 ua:WCIJii: <l:~frl~w Clwa:I-CIJ z ... 15 . -' 5 lD " II II . ~ . f,(. G . :~ i?9"A ..'~".~ ...it.. i1~.;..:~.... ''<.''. .~~ .- . ",-~ . t I . tEl ,~ :i~ t~~ . ':;JIl""l . 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ z o ~ > W ..J W CJ z ;: 2 - :E w c <( o <( \ \ \ \ ~. 11 . to.,- ::.1. ~';. '.;. :...~ "rr' $.. J.. II II :IE > CJ )( ~ . ,. ;., !. ~ . II ex. e . II . II . ''1:44' t'" ., ., . /\ .;:t\; 8.. ~ ,~ \ . ~}i!F. ((.i:r '." t', i'. J.... 'jf." ;;.1. .>'.~ 'li\r~'}~ Ih , : ;,r::<~,?~." :~~.:~ ;,~:~ (:'1. I .~ . ..,~'../ J j ,.; ); .'!> '; ....~ '..-' ~ '. . I;,~ ,,~~,~,> !t; ~} '. y "." ., " "" II ~I II . jl . . t ._ ~G.\ r .. If.' ..: I'," " \ ~;~ ~::..~:., ~l"~'li ;:~~ ' ",i ':' "I~ ':. .', , ->tf~~', :;.-~i~,:'; .r...,'( . ;:.r.......jt-~:.. : . ,i....~ ~.,lii ". "~:Ii...< I..~-,,:t:-:.>~,..I ..",oJ' ...........lfi~ .~~ I!" ~ . ~t~. ~ ~ J- . . It , : '" ~. ,I' I-" ~ 1--' ,). ~",.:;. """ ... ~ I . ~I~j ~<\' ~e .~:. ",,;*;~::. ",i;,.'l."';-!'~~!; ., z ~.' .. .I."('..~ . I' ',. 't.,. .< ~~: :__:(j)~..,...:\~~~.~.;.,-~~;: ~ ; ,~:'t~. . e.IZ~',' ".'.)" ,.." ' W. 0".<' . '.1"'" r'{ . c( . ~i"IU' ....' , .,." '.")')/ . ~'. .0; ~ ~,-'t... I -1II'.1'~ :"~ .. \ ~;: -'-;:(: ~ I ".: .;~ '~~<.~ ~'.i:;'~~;-. .,t " .~~" .: lJi. "> tL-- II " :2 > CJ X :) el: ~w ZU wZ eel: :)a: ~~ UlZ w 1/ " II ....I o o ll. w U Z 0, W (3 Ul ,. " 8(. ta- Z wO a:- :)Ul ~~ :)ll.' &Lx W Z 'wO a:iij :)Z ~el: :)ll. &Lx w II...."~. - . I) ... City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us e)(. II, TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director RE: Farmington High School Preliminary Plat and Site Plan DATE: August 2, 2006 INTRODUCTION Parks and Recreation Department staff members have reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan for the Farmington School District's new high school. DISCUSSION Previously the City entered into an agreement with the Farmington School District regarding the park dedication requirements for the Farmington High School. The agreement specifies that the City will not require dedication for "parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space or fees in lieu thereof' in connection with the School District's development of the Christensen Property for a high school site. Regarding sidewalk locations, staff would like to suggest that an additional sidewalk be shown conceptually to be constructed at a later date along the road that is located along the most western side of the high school that will connect from the future 20Sth Street road south to a sidewalk that ends on the west side of the bus corral. This would provide a sidewalk loop north to south and would provide good student and pedestrian access to the overall site when future residential development occurs in Farmington to the north and in Lakeville to the west. Exhibit A shows the location of this sidewalk. Regarding trail locations, staff would like to suggest that an additional trail be constructed on the south and west side of the pond that is located on the west side of Flagstaff Avenue and also along the east side of the pond on the west side of Flagstaff Avenue in order to provide better trail access to the high school. Staff would like to see these trails constructed during the high school construction project so that these trails are in and can be used by students and other pedestrians to access the high school site from the east. At the same time, a trail should be conceptually shown to connect to the south so that when development occurs to the south, student and pedestrian access can occur from the south to the high school site. Finally, a trail should be conceptually shown on the south side of 20Sth Street on the high school site plan as it is anticipated that this trail would extend west back to Lakeville to Cedar Avenue. Exhibit A shows conceptually the location of these additional trails that should be shown on the site plan. The Parks and Recreation Director and Solid Waste Supervisor have reviewed the site plan for solid waste issues and do not have any issues with the location of the trash compactor and box. ACTION REQUESTED The following revisions are being recommended: 1. Conceptually identify a future sidewalk to be constructed along the private drive that will be extended at a later date on the west side ofthe high school and will connect to the future 20Sth Street to the bus corral as shown in Exhibit A. 2. Show on the site plan additional conceptual locations of trails that are shown in Exhibit A. :r<~s~~ Randy Distad Parks and Recreation Director cc: Benno Klotz II . _~ :r- (i'~~ ~ '^ .","\:l~ of! ~ !~ 1l VI ~ -c;; c \I)., ~ - 0 Q ~ .) ~J. ~ ~ ~ ~ &..4=- ~ ~ a.. ~ ~ '" 1:\ ~ .~ ~ '"'_ ~-.:r 1..J- '-.l c.;..... ~ ";) -0- ~ --.:T '.71 1> ~ ~-J ~(t ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ i!i ~ <> a ~~.$. p ~/:::! oJ) ....~ ~,o c.J 8) Q.-~ >Ii - ~ :A~~-+ll~~ A- I J r ~~ , ~~. ~. Ex. HI- II ;-"!-------- 1>< It; IW ,% II) F- == -- cc_c.c_ c= _=c=-~-::-- Ji I _",_,,,_'h~......1.1&. I I~-- I I II:: I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----+- I . I I I , I I I ..~,."==". --. -=.:--::r - - ~_ . I----r I , I I : , I : : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : , __ __ I- I --I ---"',' I I - -t - ,I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N ><1 lit ~ (1)' ~ ~ lI..: W 11::1 _____.....J .-r-':- ". ~ -:::,~ -~~: .;;;~~-~ ~__' _ _ -""""4"<1'" ' . lOOHOS H81H NO.L8NIV\lClV'::i NV'ld 3:::>N3~3:l3~ 3.118 no -- - .." ..-, SJ~IJlUl BUruusld BulJaautl5u3 IUf"Il::JllfI'r-UV dnoJC) ~1l0 ~ I---------------------~--------------I I "! I , >"-o.~=========== i I : I ,,~ I .~. i I ,. : if I ! ! f' I: r n ",'i 'Z" 'f- ;;;-~ = - ,ilQ!IIi~ ;~Ii-! :-SJ-3l~_t.~~$!r~ ~~~ No> O>N ~n~ ~~~~ ~5q'5 cn-D.CQ g~c~ .g~g:E O-_en _""' !~~!~ HI C ;;; c:;l ~ ] g.~ ~ ! ~ llI"gN II:lItl Ou.._~LLCQ i ... ~ .. f~ , . =0 ~ ~ "'-' ~;- ~O:: ~. :~ c . ~~~ OWo. N ~ ;; ~ .... e i :i :: n> ~~ I . ~~ O~ l~ E': s~ u :c , 0. ~~ . . .m ~2 HIH ~ t>>"i =>>.5~ -cUi a. c1Ce .,wo. ,..J ... .. ~ ., . ~eg _ uU ~~S ~~O .,-1- 0. N- o: w .l.) l.) o lI>- 1 1 I r-r---------------------------+-- I r, I X! I 1-' I WI WI J:; , '" I. , 0, 1-' oiil Iu.! , i'll , 'II! : _/<~~ l, 1___--- _~""-/'\J I '~--"'-~~:-/ (' I ~.... ::::::::::..-~. \ 5-0 ; ~ I 0-- ~~-' t I ' I' \~~ d ~ ) : I ~ Q~ - ~io5 __ /"-- I '--s._--~-~ .0: w' -<j- - l.) o ! ill ib z in <:-F:-', '" I o I ~ ) 1 I , , , i I I ., , j i II: It: I : I : , , II: I! : I :~: I 1~ j ! IW I I :i I: i 111'1 : I: ' I I I I : I : : I: I .Y----_1 Ii, [I (n~ _ -~-...':::::::.... I "II I I u~ So) - ~i...~ ......... <( : I : I: . 7~.Lg;i.!:l -.........,_ :m I ! I \.. I J:.--J:---- ~a's 0 r; t;..... I I --__---zll-....l!:!::.0v~ en............ I I ------...:::.::::--1 n ~ S'/7tr-L!~N~----L., ....,_----:z.~-...._ ~~ _n \ --_.... --,...._-~D.~ U J -........- --......... :------j/ -........ -. ----------~--- , ! Ii! -II !,~i Ii .1 , I ' I ~ , Ii : I: I, " L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, eJi. i I I i _c~~ ~'~~C9O. L . - :::::r-='..::.:::-:-i-- I , 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! , I ----+----;--. i I -+ I I I I I z ~ ~ '" ~ I I I I NI X' 1-1 W: W J:I ",I 01 1-1 0::1 WI lfjl 0::1 __-.J . iii '~~~~oAIi. II ~ ~ R ((\ ,I IL ~~ II G ~ ULJLJ ~. ~ 6-- J~=--- :: ii ~lTU~r?~~~U I, S~ U ~~\\ i~'OTHS1REET ~-~~~~-~r UL STREET AJIGNMENT ~CJ \ - ~ Ij;o ~~\ 'I f L., \ \ \ ~~\ ), I'l :5\ \ ~~ ,\ ~'''THSTREET=~: ~ If~~ ~ ~ _ A-~- _~ __ _ B_ -_-.J- _ ,) 1~1S1~ ~ \ -v; I ~ ~,p c:,JJ=;- ,J ~ Ii" II \\\ ~ I '~'\\ (' Ii ~ .' II \' (") '\ '- _J 11\\ I-~~--' /-' \ , ~APPRbXIMATE LOCATION \\ \~ 'I~ ~~, OF fETLAND IMP ACT ~ , 1< ~ ~ - - - \ 208TH ST.REET 0 i~ ~F==- - ~i, i :-_If. -,i~I' ~ ;:f,:::~~~:~~e;~~~~ ~~ ~~V~~~SChOOli !~__ 'LlL. -l ~ _ . ) Segment "B" ~N~w High Schb(jl~irFl~g~t~ff ...- - - - --,,-_T- N" -- - -'I( I Avenue to be constructed by District \ (:\ ;::: o v .... S ~IJ ';;. .:.:; G.l R ~ ... :o;l ~ ~IJ.. Segment "e" = Flagstaff to Pilot Knob to be constructed by Farmington 1000 o l-- SGaIe In reel ;~/:: BIT !\ 11.", \-~) .. .. ..... I'. Figure 28 ! i-' i (~~ :~-, f')! ~' J 2~ I - l j =- .2 C) 31 H '3 T R E ET Flagstaff Avenue/208'h Street T:::-, f).:'.. :~( '-- '".,:, :~jn h '~~!r ~ ~ ;;;: < ... -< "" " ...~ ..:... :1 S'r;:;:EET '3) :1 "1 ,)-- , C:P!J ~~ ~- ~,. Street Improvemets i9STH STREET --~_., ;: .~~ij \"C ,~~ ~ illS. ~ Sewer Improvements & Street Restoration r !i ~ II CSAH 50 to 220th Street ;r=~"-~? \~ I\\)? ~ '\ ~ II. 'C' Watermain Improvements _u. ~ ~.'~ Pilot Knob Road along CSAH 50 to South Entry ~~\ \, ' I~ "h~~ /~ ~ '\ "~A Q' 'I \\ ~, ~( "~, '-\, 'r1^~1 ~ i 'L-3L)\ /-'L-;~~ "'\:;;---:=0 ~;t'~I'::J: ~'I ~t ~~i'~) c ~/ ;/(\~~~~ ~I '\ jM f~e::::LI i ~-----~~, =-=-~.. It ~ ': I JULJL..'l"% \.<' L_~ w~ -; ',I ",,-- II "\ ri""'- -" --- ,,==;;=::::; '\.~ ~~ ') \~ ~~--'-= ~ "-;-;"I~I ii~\--"rJ'il~J~. ~~~~\~ If:;:! ~~I! jJ n:~' t;JI.I\= ~d^~ 'V. '~ '\, It t JU-l ~~\\ :0'~/~r4~~ [J\\ ~,\.\ :'----\ !I.'~" I I-~! i , ("'. \ 1V' iN \\ ; l. r\~ /--:: \/ ~] 'I" \' I '! ,I ~ ..,: '='.;'..........;, ,) \d' , \) ~.' ,L..-j; --j\~~JL_~ ~_r~,.."~~L-- --1~1- \ I 'j'j IL., \ \\ '\\ \\\\ ~ >::'~)V/ ~ ,,>. .:::.. ~?' .// ';'~ '\\ I~('"\'- if ',I - (I ------~\ :/ ~ ~! \ c'~~- v.' ".~,. l-, \'1 .. l'~i' ~ 1"\' r'.'" "-~ \\ \ '=::_-~\ '. ---==-'-,\:, I! i .-J. m_ _ ',-, () \\ -,,::-.-~-- . ~\ --~~~, J i I rCrL ~ LJL/~~,,- .. \: r\~ \ ~~~=::-::~', ;! \ '\rv ~~ , ..... ./:\. I ...) \; ~, I \\.. I:~ <, \_-0,'_ .\ .J ,'"~~~:'~'" '=-';'-''''::~~:,::~.;:-:/-_::-' . \ ::l -, , ::1' <l: ~ I - I :a . o Z' ~I( 208TH STREET '"' > < z .:.J.C' ----- -~ ~. ,~ 0 ...J W W W W-, w w w w VI- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---... :::..{;,:..... ::0 l:iq.,.P. ,.,,-" t " . . , \ ',.-' --'" :;;: o "" z -,:; -< --:, Figure 25 ex. /<. --''''-'--'', -1 i I i I , Flagstaff Avenue Road and Utility Improvements B.L 4 " 1'1.1 ~- Iill-- ~ .>. ~ -- 1--, @ --- a ---- 8 .- 8 -- @-- 8 -- @-- @- @) --- ~..-._~~ -.....-,..., ........'-"" ...--.....- ~....,._.... -....... -..,."'..... --,.." ,"--~' :::::~.,.... z ~. iiiiiiiiiiii: FARMINGTON AREA HIGH SCHOOL I I I -I I I I I I I I ~ I ~I ~I ~I I I I I~'~ I I "L ~~ ........... t3t..ez I ~ .. ~--=--4: --- j VI 1/4 · S}'IE 1/4 .!&M", ..,.___IIIa. :'::~II'IIA.I!I ..,.___0 :.~~_...a!ll I I I I I ~--- '," li".iI ... e'X.M n.ACSTItF' .. An' 1!. _ .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1-____ ;~ I ~. I .~ d~ I I I I ~~I l:i I; ~ . ~ I I U I I.~ I I_n.~ I' I I I _ _ _ _ ~9~~16t: _ ~NEl/4~~-,I~ OUTLOT '0' p --- - ~ --. :'m"1Cl/4 110.00 ACRES ....."'< · 1 I i';1~ 51~ I~ jl ., \ I ~ ~~~ \ ~ ,Y ^,y' -I Xl.c1~ SOl72tOtrw I I I I :0: I I e-.. IS C I ~ :; c t.rl I I I I I ~ :::.~. l/4 1a I 19 I :w I 21 I 2~ I 2j I 2L I ~5t I 26 I 27 I ~B I at/,I.O, '..;' I ~," I I _=CO'-~';O ,rjB,::,-'.""~"''''i~__ I I - I "/ I ,...-L--L 0....-- ........- ~./ T ,"'."", '-'u.",...I . -........ ~ I \, / m____ ~"Sf=.- . - FARMINGTON AREA HIGH SCHOOL SHEET " OF ,. SHB:JCTS N 'A ~ a U"O"o . ~ u. .~ u] \~Ha. . \) ~ ]'!J ~ ~ "0 .l!l 'E ::J ~ U ~ 'S: Q) .><: '" ...J ISO #192 Property E1<./V {] o CJ ~ 0 o 'b'D D 0) CJ 4&- ~~6 140270001011 39.97 d'D U /} IJ:? ~. ". . D"~D ~o ~ o /J).== ~"= ~".~ OOD ~~ ~. ~?' ~o== CJ <f /J U ~o = ~ fa n a !10~ ;: t. /J" ~"O" Q 0 Q \J ~ Donnelly Farms Limited Partnership Q) > <t: ~ co Ul C> co u: Patrick Donnelly N GJ c 'w 11l co 1j 140270002290 70.03 Basin 1 'So c::::t::J a" ~ c::::J 0 [J d 0 CJ 0 [J c> 0 Christensen 0 Property r;] CJ SJ CJ ~j.'~.::J ,,"0-= ~O\j."" -.-"'. ....,... - ----I .vrv: '~i~= lOOH8S H8 .... ..:~ ~()~8~.I.~_~Y~ I ._::'':Z I I ; ~f. I . I I L ~ I , -. .~""' dn~J~' ~O ~ lS~O~ 'tiO~ lON ~:-=- .' .. -vrv-: .~;~::~ ~~. 0 J u..1l. ~~ CO ." ,~ >-~ 'Ill! ~ 1"1111 I I ~: I ~[ I . I I L ex- P --.J E:x. Q I I s"'O~ ,,0' ,0>1 ""'..'" . ......,. . ...=>";;;: "'-vrv- ._,~~:...... -. I &/tlII9lU1 ~"".Id &u\l......,ou:a .lnl:"'II~1'9' dnoJC) ~1l0 ~ ~~: L ~ GX.R I I "'s"o~ ,,0; ,0" :<~rv:: .:..:;;:=~ -- I -- dn;J5' ~io ~ >- ..J Z o ~ -. u.c, ~~ OU >-" o::~ <(0 ~~ ~" ..J" WO:: 0::0 c.u. L ~~: -!.. Q -.J }.SNO~ ~O;! }.Ot-l ~1Si:. a-;:.-:: .. -,;;~ vrv ...r::,~~ lOOH8S H81H NO.l8NIV\lt:I'If.:l N'Iild 8NIO'v'<:l8 I ..,- d"n~J9' ~i"o ~ ~ z o ~... LLo-' ~=! OU >-C) o::~ <(0 ~~ ~C) ...J- wo:: HI, g: fr ~x.s I (.) ~ '" 'U 1-("')- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - -I I.. I II- I Iw I IW I I~ I 10 I : I- I ni!l1:::'::3 I Ilb, ;; IQ:: I,' I',' Ie" I'." I I I I I I 1'1 I I ': , I I I I' 12 IW ,W i~ 10 \1- '0:: I'~ ~.~'J".'~~{~ ).;;.;;';;.:i L ~ /O~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, City Council Members City Administrator (j Tony Wippler Assistant City Planner I t{)C, Date Filed: 7 -5-06 Date Completed: 7-5-06 Action Deadline: 9-3-06 TO: SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Winkler Property - Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION I DISCUSSION The applicant, Bart Winkler, has submitted a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Rezoning for his property, which is generally located east of the East Farmington development and south of 213 th Street (Exhibit A). The property consists of two parcels of land totaling approximately 70 acres. The westernmost parcel contains approximately 56 acres and was annexed into the City of Farmington by Ordinance on April 16, 2001. The remaining 13.514 acre parcel was annexed by joint resolution and approved by the Municpal Boundary Adjustment Unit of the Office of Administrative Hearings [MBAU] on September 15, 2005. Upon annexation into the City the property was automatically zoned A-I (Agricultural) per the City Code. The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Non-designated to LowlMedium Density and Medium Density designations - Exhibit B, and a rezoning of the subject property from A-I (Agricultural) to R-2 (LowlMedium Density Residential) and R-3 (Medium Density Residential) - Exhibit C. Planning Commission Meeting At the Planning Commission meeting on August 8, 2006, the Commission recommended approval of (a) the Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Non-designated to Low/Medium Density and Medium Density and (b) a Rezoning of the property from A-I to R-2 (LowlMedium Density Residential) and R-3 (Medium Density Residential) contingent upon the following condition: 1. Subject to the Metropolitan Council approval of the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning of the subject property and forwarded this recommendation onto the City Council. The Planning Commission minutes from the August 8th meeting are attached as Exhibit D. ACTION REQUESTED 1. Approve the attached Resolution granting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Non- designated to Low/Medium Density and Medium Density. 2. Adopt the attached Ordinance rezoning the subject property from A-I to R-2 and R-3. Respectfully submitted, flU ~ Ton~iPPl~sistant City Planner Cc: Bart Winkler '1 II II 1/ D ~ I - - II I - -I 'J -rrr 1III1 ._~ == /"[[ft1flHi~tt~~\ 0 J T~~- L ~~mnm~1 ~ ~~HHamHBl h1 I~~II ~ it!] tfEe~ ~ fIffi ~ I I ~!II!ill fIJ m!!ill _ ~in~~1 ~-a ag IIIBf~ .-~nni&]~a i w~~] S~Dg _ w~~ t= ~~ WE J I _EE1::;:Dg D~ ~ EEl - - I I _L- ~ EEl - m~~=~-~ 1=== ~ :: tdm~~m_~1 tl '--=~I II I II I I. J I .u J ~<D ~II I I _ ~_.- '>1 -r" ~~m~ ~ L 1111 I]~;, -\ ~-;;;'~t :\.~E 1= ~ / IIII ~ + ~ I II r '~~"...J~~'J::f r- \( It- ~~ ~~~ I- Y r - ))11 ;::::!:::: b9 --I ~ II II II II { " l II " . ffi~ ~ 111:( l- I I I I Y IIII If W IIIII~ I 1 I I I I I " EXHIBIT A tJ D ~ WINKL\ PROPERTY rt; ., '.- ~,:r~' ~.; ~ ~'t 1l'l'."'" ~', -'~ ~'!~.~~i~~:'..~.~ ;,."&.: - . ",-- _ ~ ....~"'~_ f:' ~~~,.. .> :~~ ..... y~~,. .4 j "~;;'" -~, ~- /"H;.L'" ~'h?':'U ,l,:! r~: ~'I ~:;;~4 r-?~ .,''r 'I ~~:.~~' '1~':; .~:;.~t '":1 -~ :~ . ~"",.. '..' , '-. . 'H' ", ( ~~:\~'~~~:;E~:.1t;.~~~; In n CASTLE RDCIC 1lNNSHIP I I II . ~~~ -II 1 r-l--' I I~I '" 1- -i-.-,--\- J t;:; -rS- -I r J ~ I Li:J~~ LU_U~:_{_~J ~ ~---- ----L " II . " :~>~ \~;f' . ~ ; ~"'-. ,~'~'2~~;:. _,~."'~:' ,"*~':~: ~i; -t~";" 0:.......... '''-~:\'' .~ ~~.../, ~~1l .... ~.'.( _, _~. .~ ~, . '~ -<(.;:t..:. 1 1".",. l:r ""';,Ij,! .....,;.-......... . not.! II:'" t_.. 11""'''' . ", I . ,";0" . <. ~ .. ..... .... ~ '~, "J. .- ~ ~~ ~,- ;?': e;.,: :ftr'>:~.J ~ ~ .~~.. ". .,. <" ~ "'~' 'k.";;:;;. :..,~~ . .f <.. ',,'~. ~":':;-'>ifl(!":'~~~~' ,~'tW:~---:' ,~~""",-',',"V_ ~... :":F.;!~~1'.: ,':tC,,~~.~,'i :" ~'li'". ">;;>->:':.l. .....:,.~.,~... ;t/.... '1;.'~"'J'''~ .tl,l-"~~"'i"!,\ 'f~,....'r.~;' '"._ -"'_,01'.;..,:. : _~ .,;; ~..>>, ."', '" '~"!.~ " .,,..,.~ ~ ,',' /'~'" -"!.. ~~~ ", ' 1 .~ -t:<,'. -.~\ +'1, ';". -i "~;~:"'~:'t;i7:"~'.-~'.:':~..))~<~/.~..'~. '''"." . \:;,'" .. '_, ',~.';:> ~"'~J'_"~<?:.~t.~.,~~~..,~ '.' ..10, .04., '1 i.:".:,r'.~~'>_ .~. ;"" ~'"!~,:~)~ , ,;l:~. " I /~. >;' "~'~l ~/<".:<", '11",' ~~~~,..'~'i!' -:,~: . ,-if. ,,'1: \\''1J." l:fi .~;:,,-J.:r', J.~ 1 :~, --;..' '1;" '" :'fllt:..... , ',:," ;>..~,,"t ,~, ;t':l':-:: , -, - ~~ ~ , . '. '-'. .,' . .' '.; 'i..'~~ ~ f"""f' '.~" hl";;,-'~, "", ".j;....'Nf'.; . .,;jI" "f""'''''f~.~o\'"' ~ ';'i'~;; ;:>'::"~~~~ .1, ~.. . .~~,0!;;')f':' .;~" oj;; '~" . ..... ",' '," ',. -.~ ~., ;; ~.' ,. . ",' ..., ..'{..~..~, , · ..:. . "", ~, . - [. .'" '. .11"<' ',",' '"',. 1"~ ~." i~ ~'i.::.;..~\.::.,;-...... '. '...: ...~: 'II,~" ~.~r~\-...-::~:~ -' .f~'lI~ ,'.'rr ,"" "._'~. tI ~~;1 ~,.;~ '),"""";';''j. ';:li. .V: ";t)".\~'.;:'-1, ". '" ' _ .". ~"..;,~. '.: . ",,' i1;;.' _.". : '~~"""?li' ~ .;::.('. "" '. ",~.,.. -'''i )':-'f" ~"~ ~~..., jt-.%o;. . : .' .{<:-'" i';"~.{" ," :;:"";,"';;'.: . .... ,.I*-;::iii.' ..~ "~,~. ....~: f .' . ~ ""'~'"",... "., . ("^' "" \'. ~.. A -' P'~'<t . ~' . ..:.... ..,~,'.~.r;;. '.", .,. '~~, "~~-.' 'v' ',,~-I'~';"'-J" :.1.:,,, 'J,,,",~ -' ... y.'~. '. '."", ,,,: -;r.... - '" l 'f,; ,.jJ..., ,,; '.' ..,., ~", .' 'i' ,'l-'. ''''',.'' " "!:. '-l- . ..." .'.;~,:.": ",:..,:' :.' . "'~~';., :,.t....,,~. .",i,<"~ I _.: \ ci~ ~~. '. .,,~ "'.~'~ ~;,., '."....,J... '. ". "~:i;;'~'i.;.. ,..~. -; ',,;~~,"~ ,. ,". ~"'I~ :&\~!" .::.~ " J...,~ { ':!. "~" . ~< r . -,J' ~''''. : ".,~", .'"''''i ."'~ .~ 1'0,"*.. . ~ " - ,. ..... \ --'\~... . .t; t .. Ic'_' '''!7i;. ' '-""'~;'~ -'.I'. t "_".,~~ _,.; 1"',..':' y., _' "x."':::!, -i,;,~:L' '<:i~\'I;{.'";-... ~'" ~ ,~..* '," ..,~"~ " _~..~ .r.......J.'!'..~i\~_ ":,e.,'" .", ;;0' .." ,,,-"'~J.",,,, '". _..... 11~*"'--: ::' " . . -~~"".~;:.."., i;.,,~,i;~.....-'!.~~ ' """~'c'\.g,["':fi~j !/I<,~'. . -.' :'~t J'''- '"t,'.ie':.:::~.. ,;. -r"~P6*1'<~;~ ~,~";~,,_: .~ ~" .' . , !l. 'F" ,- ~..;n. ..~~ 'J: . . - ,,~. ,i'~if'" ~:"~'~:I~ :,..'.') _,r... <" .. ",,- " ;:,. , c',' . l'~_-"" ".~ .'. . . " _ _, ...._. .,.,.~.. ".. .III.. '.-,..JII'. ~~~' ~~~"\_". '",-r,,',."" w I"-.,..,,:'~_:~ ' . \ ;. " 1'''.' .~~- '''.:;;~..~:;.~, . <. _. I :~._; ~ :. ".'.. , ./ . C. "\ ,-,' \l'", ."lI~'""", , ~~.- I'" ;':'_A;,;;,~. ~ . .~ 1ft 1'",' J"" '......+. ,~ :,.1' .:.-,~ . . '- - , - I~~ '~:. :. . "'. . (I;';" ~;..:c . -'l. - I "f:':~', ;9: ~.,\:' ~ \:~~.t~r:t;i~~:~,~~." ~~:; .:~l"~'~(t;:" f< 7 ::': .k:'.",~... . ~~. '1"";f . .... '1U~ " 4~' "',. '..:~'~;,~ <i~",?-,,~ '. ~.,-i.ji'<"":',~ ". , .... iN ,.~ :"" "!t.,""'" .'~. ~ ..~. t .)'>-'~~/,,,~~,),~:~ 1 '4".~'~' ~'~Jr.t~ .:?~t'~.i,., -j~'t;fI/' '?"!\ /./!'..:o" ,<. ,,;I~\""j"~'P,' ..~t;:~ ': ,-.J! '. .,::;,~>".I /.i' /,_....... ~ u~,~tf'~" ",:JI.,l ~.;t.- i> ,r,;, ~ ~'.', ... 'A I!,... ;t.: ~~;.'. ::,"p ~,~:~. , . ":"~;i j"", ,>:: 'I;~L ~ :1\_1 ;'. .:~ ; ].. . .3:1'~' '..'- ..... '1", '''.' ," '-'..e: ,},e1t""'~ ;' '.:i~f.;;" '-"!'j':. ~'1.~ ~ " """"';,1;1. '. ..,,' .~, . > ". 'I~'''''~'' ", ". ~W~"'nc, ~.~.. 't;,~:. i..... -,,::-.....~>,.,L# I '~".. '~. ~i".!t ~.. : I .. 7"f~~ ~ 4<~~ ~"-~~ . I . ~ .... . J".~:~~t:~;:~)i~~f :,~,.~ \;;:~:~ .~:~;I::..~'II:c 'J . . ..~~. '!;..-:'.\;!o;" ... ,"""'. .......,,,... -.1..'lr i /i' '. .~~";rJ' \1- ..f;~.,..;..~,,"':in ,:..:-:~ . . I ':.'~ -:.,.~ 'l: " :'~.~"f.,:.:~\tJl,l! .. .:"'. '~~l'.-~~if~~l<. '!Fi , ~, <if' '~ :-::. S.'~: ~J.t '" - t '.. J. ';":'11 <: .' ,,,,'1 "{~~i' '..;; '~: .~~\.{~!~~}~;,~~l ,., .,.. ~...-.;t.lr' ,yJ" I 4 - _ l ,.:tq ,~, ':;..;..~:.-:.;.:.:;..~.~,,;/ ~>f;,'~~',;, ;.~:.'..'"~..;~.;.~.~".:..,.: .;.~.~;'J.:.,;,.}:f:. - .r ..." ;"'1 ~ ,:~.:~s "" .',' i"'4f,' "" ...J......J> __.r 'lilt,,, II II 11 >< . -.., --z :;:..t:.:- ..:;.::.. .::-..:r_ ., "=:::=:::- ~- ~ Jl go 5 g~ ~1; - ID~ ~:!) o ~ z 0;" ~ p--4 ~ GI ~ ~ ~~ ~ i 3 '8P1 ~ FARMINGTON SITE II FARYNCTON. YN€SOTA. PROPOSED COMP~HENSIVE PLAN II LV DEVEIDPMENT, INC. :: II II ('XH18/r B ~l-[f.jiJ\ ~ @ N rr?1 ~ ~I [;-.r - -:- __ I '- C,,-= _J 10 ~ :! ~ \) ~ .... 0 \:) 0 ~ C" C- " 0 0 ~ '" C" z " \!! ~ ~ z \!l ~ 1 8~ - t z c;- . v 8 ~i!I :! [ ~ ~ James R. Hill, Inc. PlANNERS / ENGINEERS / SUR'tfYORS .....-. ::~~~=:Wms7 ...~ ::r:MII~~~~ 111)1 ~~~ ~~ I ~; ;_; ; V\~ ~I~r I ~~ ~~ T rl~-~ ~ I~ 1- 1 ~ -j r- -.J r-l.J 1 1 ~~I--L~J~T1~rJ II L- 'L --{ II I --.J L I_I_I_I--.J L --J I I L - -.l I L _ I~ "- ------ ~- - _-L___ . ~ ---L 11 II . . .......,-:~-:..:-" -- "':'::"-'::.t"i'_ ..,:=:::. -=-:- ~ ~~ ~ i ~~ Il - ~r;; FARMINGTON SITE f"ARWfCTCI'l, -.(SOTA PROPOSED ZONING LV DEVELOPWENT. INC. II o ~ ... ~~ ~i ~;;t .. -< " II L'KII1B/rc. r-~~ , ~ !@! N /'1;;1' ......tUl 0) ,= ~ 1..-: ~ I~ fffu' :.. -==-=~,- :------ 7V 10 ~ ~ ~ ;0 ;0 <i' L. .!, ~ 8~ ~ - z 1 Ii . v f gE ~ ~ James R. Hill, Inc. PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS .......- ::r:"~:::=:,sm a.._ :::-_~~~~ CXIf7J3 n- b Planning Commission Minutes August 8, 2006 Page 4 ION by Larson, second by Fitzloffto approve the sign variance . the contin cy that it meet all setbacks and be placed safely. The h ip is the size is neces to inform the public. APIF, MOTION C ED. MOTION by Johnso second by Barker to appr the grading CUP including the requirement of obtain asin three. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Charleswood Marketplace Applicant: KAMI, Inc The developer requested a continuance of the blic hearing to re-evaluate the traffic for t . site. There were significant traffic issu with Dakota County. MOT by Fitzloff, second by Larson to continue the Sember 13, 2006. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. -* c) Winkler Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Non-Designated to LowlMedium and Medium Density Residential and Rezone from A-I to R-2 and R-3 Mr. Winkler has requested a comp plan amendment and rezoning for 70 acres located on the eastern side of the City. The property was annexed into the City in two phases. The first 56 acres was annexed in 2001. The remaining 13.5 acres on the eastern side of the property were annexed in 2005. When property comes into the City it is non-designated and zoned A-I. It is proposed to amend the comp plan from non-designated to low/medium and medium density residential and rezone the property from A-I to R-2 and R-3 contingent upon the following: - Subject to the Met Council approval of the 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendment application. MOTION by Larson, second by Barker to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Larson, second by Fitzloff for a favorable recommendation to amend the comp plan from non-designated to low/medium and medium density residential and rezone the property from A-I to R-2 and R-3. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. d) Graham erty - Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Non-Desi to Low/Medium sity Residential and Rezone from A-I to RESOLUTION NO. AMENDING THE 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE WINKLER PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF THE EAST FARMINGTON DEVELOPMENT AND SOUTH OF 213TH STREET Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 sl day of August, 2006 at 7 :00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: introduced and Member _ seconded the following: Member WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a Comprehensive Land Use amendment for the Winkler property, located east of the East Farmington Development and south of213th Street, and depicted in the attached Exhibit A, and that said request proposes that the land use designation be changed from Non-Designated to Low/Medium Density and Medium Density, as depicted on Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 8th day of August, 2006 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and proper notice sent to surrounding property owners; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission accepted public comments at the public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Winkler property, located east of the East Farmington Development and south of 213lh Street, said amendment changing the land use designation from Non-Designated to Low/Medium Density and Medium Density; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Farmington hereby amends the 2020 Comprehensive Plan for the Winkler property, located east of the East Farmington Development and south of 213lh Street from Non-Designated to Low/Medium Density and Medium Density. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21 sl day of August, 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of August, 2006. City Administrator ~" I L,~" ~ ~"'~~J .-- ~ )~~< EXHIBIT A - 'IV U ~ lci(~ r ~'b ~ ~~~ - - I - f- IJ "'Tf II1I1I ~GII ~ - I IIU-U H~:::::="" ,I /' /rrr nlril ._~ \ /' JnIli -- II J Lu--; ~ ~ . AJci - WINKL\ER PROPERTY L ~ Ir8IJ ffiffi om =~p, ~~ . _ _ . _, . ",r . tiff '. ,~' ,":' ..~ ~_ -.JJ. .. . .', _.- - ~. -- I' ,( 1. , IL ~~ffiOj~ffi!ffiIM~[UU~ ~~ ~~ug c=W~~1 ~eB~ ~I I;IEW,= l1r EI~ W 11-1~l~ I~ ~ .. _ EEJ -- ~ ED - _ EEl ~ ~ l=~ E~I h n n EEl '-L- ED __ tIE1 '-~ I II I · U AAllt~~l; c.u I p:ffi c:: 1-). CD 1- I ~ - [\D.I\- iT\ 1:4 -~~11~ ~ ~~ - -~, T-: - ffi9t'-'lJ 1- -Lltl [= ~ " 1111 rnILJL I ~~~'- Jlll1JT~ :~~ ~ i !: ~ TTiITTI~ . /~ t ..1:= ; 1- ,.. [I I II I 111111 II--f"llll t=J ] .. CASTLE RDCIC llNNSHlP I I d il n I I ~ltJ ~~ I~; ;~; ;~~I I~I I ~~ ~~ T il I~~ ~I~I II -.J ~l.J I ~I ~ ~I---h- T\:- J ~ ~ --I _ J . ~ ": LJ-i-~-,_~_ L'=U-l~L{)J L------ --------~--~-- -- II . ~ ~ II II Il . . ?xIl76/r B ~) l[f;iil\ F @ N 'IS. 0'> c::_ e3 r< = ---, en \,[-r' \ \"~ =:-=-:= J ---" ID ~ " ,... '" 0 c '" c '? ~ S1 '" c z " VI ~ ~ VI ~ i 8~ . . : ~S .r z ~ '" I i~o ~ ~ ~ - ~'" !il ~ !~ FARMINGTON SITE FARWIC'fON. ..-soYA II PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LV DEVELOPMENT, INC. --:::::..-..:'"' ~ James R. Hill, Inc. .::.::.. - ':;~..r{ ... PL'.NNERS / ENGINEERS / SUR\rrnRS '"'."='_:::'::::':- !IWf ....0- :t~,.~=:. ...c... =:-~~~M~m: o ~ .. ~~ ~ i aM ~ " II CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance Amending Title 10 of the Farmington City Code, the Farmington Zoning Ordinance, rezoning the property known as the Winkler property. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 10-5-1 of the Farmington City Code is amended by rezoning the property legally described on the attached Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B from A-I (Agriculture) to R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential) and R-3 (Medium Density Residntial). SECTION 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Farmington, adopted under Section 10-5- 1 of the Farmington City Code, shall be republished to show the aforesaid zoning. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage. Adopted this _ day of , 2006, by the City Council of the City of Farmington. SEAL CITY OF FARMINGTON MAYOR ATTEST: CITY ADMINISTRATOR Approved as to form the _ day of ,2006. CITY ATTORNEY Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,2006. EXHIBIT A Legal description of property to be rezoned: The West 2200 feet of the South one-half(S Yz) of the Northeast Quarter (NE~) of Section 32, Township 114, Range 19, Dakota County, EXCEPTING therefrom the west 350 feet thereof. Containing 56.12 acres more or less. [AND] The South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 114, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota, except the West 2200 feet thereof. Containing 13.514 acres. . ~ 1111311- 13> -L II " II " . _..... ~ '~...~.; '\ ,'r~.~, <. . >j 'i-t. rr-- ~ ~I N /". "." 'Ll~, 0'> ::'...,' ~ > . I.it' :-;-- ,/ 10 ~ .., .., ~ ~ 8~ - z 8 . v f ~9 ~ . II ~ ~ ~n a ~~ lD~ .... lD!l ;~ o t. z gjJ;; ~ 9-i "G1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~ iP1 <D '" -< FARMINGTON SITE '~~TA PROPOSED ZONING LV DEVEWPIlENT. INC. II -, ~:;:.,,-:.:- ~._-:'''7_ "':E::.=. ~- ~ James R. Hill, Inc. PlANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS ......ca. =~"~~=:'!I5m ...- :::-~~~q,~-: II II lod City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: It{J<..--- Mayor, Council Members City AdministratorG Lee Smick, AICP \ City Planner Date Filed: 7-24-06 Date Complete: 7-24-06 Action Deadline: 9-24-06 (Amendments) Action Deadline: 10-22-06 (Variance) FROM: SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Graham Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION On behalf of Mr. Gerald Graham, the City has recently proposed a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning for his property located at 3782 220th Street West. Exhibit A shows the property as Non-Designated on the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning as A-I (Agriculture). Staff is proposing to amend the property from Non-Designated to Low-Medium Density and rezone the property from A-I (Agriculture) to R-2 (Low-Medium Density Residential) (Exhibit B). DISCUSSION At the August 8, 2006 Planning Commission meeting (Exhibit C), the Commissioners voted 5-0 to amend the Graham property from Non-Designated to Low-Medium Density and rezone the property from A-I (Agriculture) to R-2 (Low-Medium Density Residential). The Graham property was part of a twenty-three property annexation that occurred on September 15,2005 during the Ash Street Reconstruction project (Exhibit D). All of the annexed properties will eventually need to be given Comprehensive Plan designations and City Zoning classifications. Mr. Graham applied for a variance from the minimum lot width requirement on June 22, 2006 in order to split the existing lot at 3782 220th Street West into two separate lots. One of the new lots would be for an existing home, and the second lot is where Mr. Graham plans to build a new home (Exhibit E). Due to the need to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Rezone the property first, a letter was sent to Mr. Graham extending the Planning Commission's review period for the variance to October 22, 2006 (Exhibit F). Because of the surrounding designations and zones (Exhibit A and B) adjacent to the Graham property, staff proposes that the property be designated for Low-Medium Density Residential and zoned to R-2. Although Exhibit A shows the properties along Sunnyside and Centennial Drive as Low Density Residential, staff will soon be bringing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Planning Commission and City Council requesting that this area be amended to Low-Medium Density Residential to be consistent with the current zoning ofR-2 in this area. Most of the lots in these areas contain lot sizes of less than 10,000 square feet; therefore, the amendment to a Low-Medium Density Residential designation is warranted. Additionally, staff will bring the remaining twenty-two annexed properties to the Planning Commission and City Council for review at future meetings at which time staff will propose Low-Medium Density Residential designations and R-2 zoning classification for the properties in question. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the attached resolution amending the property at 3782 220th Street West from Non- Designated to Low-Medium Density Residential on the 2020 Comprehensive Plan and approve the attached ordinance rezoning the property from A-I (Agriculture) to R-2 (Low-Medium Density Residential) contingent upon the following: 1. Subject to Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. Respectfully submitted, ..~ \-.- .~/ 72r/ '71~~t -1/L . Lee Smick, AICP City Planner cc: Gerald Graham RESOLUTION NO. AMENDING THE 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3782 220th STREET WEST FROM NON- DESIGNATED TO LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21 sl day of August, 2006 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member _ seconded the following: WHEREAS, the City of Farmington has initiated a Comprehensive Land Use amendment for the property located 3782 220lh Street West from Non-Designated to Low-Medium Density Residential, and WHEREAS; the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 81h day of August, 2006 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and proper notice sent to surrounding property owners, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission accepted public comments at the public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property located 3782 220th Street West from Non-Designated to Low-Medium Density Residential. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Farmington hereby amends the 2020 Comprehensive Plan for the property located 3782 220th Street West from Non- Designated to Low-Medium Density Residential contingent upon the following: I. Subject to Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21 sl day of August, 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of August, 2006. City Administrator CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance Amending Title 10 of the Farmington City Code, the Farmington Zoning Ordinance, rezoning the property located at 3782 220th Street West from A-I (Agriculture) to R-2 (Low-Medium Density Residential) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 10-5-1 of the Farmington City Code is amended by rezoning the property located at 3782 220th Street West from A-I (Agriculture) to R-2 (Low-Medium Density Residential). SECTION 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Farmington, adopted under Section 10-5- I of the Farmington City Code, shall be republished to show the aforesaid zoning. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage. Adopted this _ day of ,2006, by the City Council of the City of Farmington. SEAL CITY OF FARMINGTON MAYOR ATTEST: CITY ADMINISTRATOR Approved as to form the _ day of , 2006. CITY ATTORNEY Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,2006. . . . rl};"'5"" 11m II'::-'!' 'l( :1 ". ~ , If' ~. .~':;I' ~I ~'1'~ ;.~,; ;~.~ -'-.:,~,j ~l.....:_il"""_"", ~~"1~ \i~~ ~~,~~_ ~ ~rt; ~t'_---, _;.~' h ~ ~ ~ ~.-~' '~:~ ~'th .F':I 1IiiT'~ .~ ~~o_ ~ - . " q ~.'i -,~ .'=' ~ nil ~v ,~ Graham Property Comprehensive Plan ~~,. . i... ~ ~, r _-- r' :..I.;~.' ~ > I . " [, "'.'....'.....'. " ~Yai~~. i;!e "":",r:h, ~~' ~..._,,_~~~ '.1 Legend _ Urban Reserve _ Commercial _ Industrial _ Business Park _ Mixed-Use (Public/Residential) _ Mixed-Use (Commercial/Residential) D Low Density ~ Low Medium _ Medium Density _ High Density _ Public/Semi-Public _ Park/Open Space IiiII Environmentally Sensitive _ Non-Designated _ Restricted Development D ROW (Right-of-Way) - Floodplain Boundary ----Proposed Diamond Path Roadway Alignment - \\~ '\ \\1 == " ~ LD ~ _7 f\ ~+ '-/~U LL II I ~l . . " .~ - . - J . , I F-"- . '~ _. OJ ...l f---"-.-. II < I------ I w,~ ~......J6..... - r-- = - - - - - ""D '-- - - .--- '-, I----- - \- I--- --'- - - I Created August 3, 2006 --,- .- ~ . _0 I . '=d.." 'I.. - .:-- BI \ ~ ~. ,-~.. . II " II ~.II~ I c, ,I ~ -,I ,- I L ; M J: I- / r- I I I D N 6C .6 . Graham Property Zoning . II R-2 ~ ~ - I /"' ., - . 't- W~ C= I - - Trl~ I I ~~,= Di / F ,-2 ~ If[ ~ t ~ I~ - - IT; ~~ ~. - - f---- - I---- - - I---- T - .!!!!......= IIII :::....:: :....:.: - - C') - - - - - \~~ -:7 ~ ~~ 'Bra I I ' t~" ~ , ::: 'tiIt t-- '-- R - L- ( II ~C 1== II ......... /"---U .--- i-- L2 I---- ----' I--- =k):: I---- Legend f-- I---- - R-l ~ A-I (ARricu!lu..) ~l I II \-- - CJ R-t (Low Density Residential) f= c:::J R-2 (Low/M@diumDensityResldential) [gJ R-3 (Medium Density Residential) .. R-4 (Medium/HiKh Density Residential) '-- - - I- ~ ~ R...5 (High DensUy Residential) - ~ - III R-T (Downtown Transitional Mixed Use) - ~ _ R-O (Downtown Residential) ~~ _ B-1(HIRhway Bu.I.....) I I l- I .. B-2 (Downtown Business) .. B-3 (Heavy Bu!Oinesll) .. B-4 (NeiKhborhood Business) I I .. $C (Spruce Street Commercial) .. Business/Commercial Flex 6 .. Mixed-Use .. IP (Industrial Park) .. 1-1 (Industrial) _ P/OS (pa,k/Open Space) D ROW (RIRht-o(.Way) - MUSA Boundary N .. Historic Properties Created August 3, 2006 'I . Planning Commission Minutes August 8, 2006 Page 4 ~x. c." MOTION by Larson, second by Fitzloffto approve the sign variance with the contingency that it meet all setbacks and be placed safely. The hardship is the size is necessary to inform the public. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Johnson, second by Barker to approve the grading CUP including the requirement of obtaining the easement for basin three. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Charleswood Marketplace Preliminary and Final Plat / Site Plan Applicant: KAMI, Inc. The developer has requested a continuance of the public hearing to re-evaluate the traffic for this site. There were significant traffic issues with Dakota County. MOTION by Fitzloff, second by Larson to continue the public hearing to September 13, 2006. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Winkler Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Non-Designated to LowlMedium and Medium Density Residential and Rezone from A-I to R-2 and R-3 Mr. Winkler has requested a comp plan amendment and rezoning for 70 acres located on the eastern side of the City. The property was annexed into the City in two phases. The first 56 acres was annexed in 2001. The remaining 13.5 acres on the eastern side of the property were annexed in 2005. When property comes into the City it is non-designated and zoned A-I. It is proposed to amend the comp plan from non-designated to low/medium and medium density residential and rezone the property from A-I to R-2 and R-3 contingent upon the following: - Subject to the Met Council approval of the 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendment application. MOTION by Larson, second by Barker to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Larson, second by Fitzloff for a favorable recommendation to amend the comp plan from non-designated to low/medium and medium density residential and rezone the property from A-I to R-2 and R-3. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. ~d) Graham Property - Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Non-Designated to LowlMedium Density Residential and Rezone from A-I to R-2 Staff recommends approval oflow/medium density residential and rezoning to R- 2. At the next meeting staffwill bring a variance to the non-standard lot width, and a plan for 22 lots. MOTION by Barker, second by Johnson to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Johnson, second by Barker to approve the comp plan amendment to low/medium density and rezone the property to R-2. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. ek.o I~ Cil 0. '0 '22 I- ~ <ll ~ :2E ~.;;: 0 '" .... Q)o. co. 0 :=<ll Q) Q) 0).... <ll <ll C '" .tii.~ om ..-g 2~ 00 Z..o C'? "0 Ql- C'0 -C'? ctlC'j 0_ ~ 1- I 4- a +-' 0 ~ C/) .... Q) 0 "0 @ S 00 Z...J Qll- -0 =f/) u..-< Q) U >. f/) Ii Q) Ql t: 0>0> U ctlu; t: Ql l- 'iij 0 eo Di::' 0.. >.ctl ctlt: ~~ ~.E 0- Ql= -Ql ctlL- eo sa.. ~ Ql .;:: 'iij Q) L- a.. () L- eo 0.. <{z c. :c II) t: a; ~ ctl Q) 0- u. I-g 0 ~Ql o t: tn o t: N ~.- r--- Ql~ ~@ 1ii ctl ~ U ~ 0 i (") "<t 0 ~E;) ~ ~ 0 1.1) N aA'V alepuadd!4~ o ~U) r--- ~ ~m "<t @~ ~ <0 ~~ ~ , 1_- 2 - ~l ~II[~~~, ~ ~ nI ,. " ~ ~ ~~~ ~9;f ~~~ -",'" .3(.:)5 '" '" '" ~ '" - ~ '0 il n ." I jj ! ~~~ ~ ~ ~"l; t ~:::::::: ~.: .~ ..~ H )1 .hi !~ ~~1 t~ ! !t' f8j i:.!.. .i;1 ~h ;~ :;Jf.t i! :~~ - 5 I' 1] ~;~ ..Iii "',U i~ in ..; ~H i. ti ~ 00 U HI ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ " rimH ~ ....;.gt; 0 ~:i~~i~ il-~.,H n:l'!! ~ i~'hjl~ II ~~l!~~ 5 .2e.!li~..~~ S ~i~:~!h !1Im'f HHm~ .H!i~!.i ~ ~ { L: ~ ....1:: ~ o~ ~ ~~ - J ] :i~ I '" , ~ i; I ~ ] ~j ~i ~ 1 ~~1<;: l; ~ j]~j ~~ ~ ~~: .SR ~~; )~ ~ H] i~ h :-'2: g.~",j; r:! l ~~ l~ a ~ u ~~ I"\.~' P ~~~ jf / \'.L~~ '" o I~ HJ !~f :li ill hi I '., ~\\:t ;~': ~~ k ~:~>. ~ \\. ,:, ~~~~1; ~rt ' ,~; ~~" ~~ \i- ~~~ ~"~~ ~ /:'>, ":~"..- I- ~! lliiH ~ CJ) .c: il; (y= 1:'6' ~: ;~ ;i f~ ., ! ~ ] , U ef .e Ij ~- ~j ~i !J I 'Ci E .: VI i... .! ~ I..! r l:I.. ~: g"S ~ '" ~ }' , ~ i.,.' i ~I ~n ~ ~d~; '" -~ ~- ~ ~ I ;! ~! ~ ~ ::~:; ~ :t i: S i~ .1 .~ '0'" ~ I!::i 'E '.tJ ~~~ ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~J; ~II H 1 ~~H~! HH 00 I I it ~ l a ~: :~ 'i &- !! ~~ [0 m ~~. =.50; ~ ~ ~.~Vi .., ~ t~~ ~ ~ it! i ~ :E'~ .! @ j i ~ s i: ~o' ~ ~ :: . ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ d ~. g i ~ ~ ~~ l ! II II L ~~ I · i q 1'l '~i iH 1~~ .! H,- I~" d:i tJll:.! ~ II> 11 HUH q~D~ ! I I~ o E 'Ii v ... ,51 u o rn rn <l: '0 c: C eX. E ]~ 11 "' lJ ... V '0 .c v !l:: i "!; .... ~ . !! o !~ Ii ~ i l~ ~ ~ It! t; .~ . I. ~~ '0 ~1 !~ ~ ~~ ;i ~ ~i ~~ ! ~j :" <1i ~ I~ ~ ~~ !~ . ~~ ~~ >g! City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us eX.F August 2, 2006 Mr. Gerald W. Graham 3460 I43rd Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 Re: Variance Application for Minimum Lot Width - 3782 220th Street Dear Mr. Graham: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that pursuant to Minn. Stat. 9 15.99, subd. 3(f) the City of Farmington is extending the time period for review of your variance application for the property noted above and that was submitted by you to the City on June 22, 2006. The reason for this extension is to amend the Comprehensive Plan and rezone the property at 3782 220th Street before the variance application is reviewed. The anticipated length of this extension is an additional 60 days from the date of expiration of the City's initial 60 days for review provided (October 22,2006) under Minn. Stat. 9 15.99. The time extension will allow the City to meet the deadlines of the planning process that includes the designation and rezoning of the property at the City Council. Please feel free to call me at (651) 463-1820 with any questions you may have regarding your application or the City's process for review of your application. Respectfully submitted, ..~," ,,...---- /1 tJ!Q' :. Lee Smick, AICP City Planner cc: Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer File City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us JOe TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator@ FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Elm Street Open House Comments DATE: August 21,2006 INTRODUCTION The first open house for the Elm Street project was held on Thursday, July 27. DISCUSSION Attached is a compilation of the written comments that were received during the open house that was held for the Elm Street project. The main themes identified from the verbal and written comments received are concerns about access during the construction and a desire for some aesthetic improvements in the business area. Staff along with Dakota County will be formulating a plan to address the access concerns to the extent possible. Staff has also looked into the potential costs to add streetscape aesthetics to the project between 4th Street and the railroad tracks, as an example for Council's consideration. Ballpark estimates of costs based on the concept sketches at the open house could range from $600,000 to $850,000 in additional costs between 4th and the tracks. Based on the assessment policy and the estimated number ofREU's (Residential Equivalent Units) in the project area, the additional cost per REU, (assuming 35% of the costs are assessed over the entire project area) would be in the range of$300 to $450. BUDGET IMPACT None at this time. Costs for the Elm Street project as well as estimated assessment amounts will be presented with the feasibility report that will be brought to the City Council in the fall. ACTION REQUESTED Council direction to staff to include or not include streetscape aesthetics with the associated estimates of cost in the feasibility report. Respectfully Submitted, :Z-~'r11~ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file CQ o o ("II -- ..... ("II -- ..... C .- E 'gw_c - CP CJ .2 :: .c .!. -; ~. ... - e .~ Q. ~-g~~g O)CPE'" 5c~EC) >- .~ en 8 ~ '" oCt s c CP E E o o CP '" ::J o ::I: c CP Q. o - ... 'E, 0 0)'- '" Q) c E Ii CP ~. L: ';-;~g"':::; ~:;'E,cP~g .=s=,Q~ I 't:SCCPu)C;~ cpCP>~-- t)E~ii;m ~ ~ 0 ~ E ~ CPOCJ~ns~ C Q. CP .; E 'in ro '- E't:S O::J. ::J ._ CP 'g .....0 ffi o CJ't:SCJCPQ)- >-.- ::J C .c L: m 2:!l)ucu.....,:z:; oCt :; c .c 0 ,!:; ~ '" CJ l1i~ CP c Q)lJ) ns CP >-~ - CJ CP 'e- D. c o :w CJ ::J ... - '" c o CJ CP 0:: - CP ~ - C/J .5 w Q) L: ...... ...... m L: ~ ... m Q) L: o "'; - 0 c 0 CPO) E lJ) E+.- o '-;- 0.8 c Q) ,!{i L: ...... C ... m .80. ~~ C Q) m C L: Q) ~O> CP C 0.- .cO D."'" oa '" '" CP ... ... Q) 't:St:: 't:Sm oCtOQ) ai'~~ EmU5 nsL: Z ,!:,2 E ~w ...... x 0 ..... m C ~...... 0 <+=.9 :E "Oiijc"'~ ~0~.8""" ,~ 0- ~ -g g> ~ l3 ~ c '6.. ......000. ~~"O:g~ :Q g's ~ ~ 5'OOlJ)Q) ~rommlJ) ...... 0) EO. ~ Q)m Q) Q) lJ)... Q) ... ,- lJ) 0 .P ,!:,2 ,!:,2 ~ Q) en~Eo"O Q)~0<e:J o a. c ..a 2lJ)8J1ilJ)"O O'......Q)-......Q) en g C C lJ) ~ l1i~~ lJ) C~Q;~~~ L:m>-Q)Q)"O ::::0.. [E E-g lJ) Q) >- lJ) Q) >- lJ) Q) >- .- L: ...... 10 10 o o '-10 N co "'t (") <0 ~"'" ~ ro (9 cQ) o~ oen N ... ~ "0 ...... C Q) Q) ~ :S:U5 ,~~ ~ ::JroN ....,0<0 (") N I 00 (")<0 "'" - o >-0>. ~ ,!:; ro ..... ,S ~ 0......._ ~oijO C lJ) lJ) OQ)Q) o lJ) E Q) lJ) ,- 0.Q):::; ro ,!:; lJ) o ~ .~ ~..a~ ~"'..a ...::J_ iijoo Q) 0 lJ) ...... Q) :5lJ)E _ lJ),_ o~...... ro 0 'm Q)ro...... ~ ,~ Q) Q) C :... L: ... ... ;~.8 >c...... o 0 ro ...Jo:5 o Z lJ) Q) >- I .- m lJ)..... o.N ,- 10 0.- ...... <0 ro Q)...... ... Q) (9 Q) ... ... ...... Q)en ~E LL_ row"", L:1.O~ ro.-LO 0.-<0 "'" o Z lJ) Q) >- o N .- ~~ o 10 I (") <0 ..."'" ro c o co ~o 0>0 ::JL: o 0 ow 10 ..... o Q) 'e- O. ,~ L: ...... o ...... Q) a. m o lJ) Q) ~ ...... lJ) "0 "0 ro Q) lJ) ro Q) 0::: o Z lJ) Q) >- o ...... (5 C lJ)...... ro lJ) o ro lJ) Q) ......0 0...... Q) ,!:; 'e- lJ) o.~ Q) lJ) lJ) Q) ro c L: ,- o.~ N..a ro.9 0>0 ,!:; :E ~ ~ E...... lJ) ro ~g ~.P ::J~ en 0 c oj ~ o~ '0 :0 E 'c ~ c ~ '~ .g -E 2 E Q; ,~ .g 0 Q) 8.L: ~ ro > > 0.0.0.(5 Q)LLO:: c Ero ~ ro 0..0,"0_ C C ~ Q) 0 ~ ,_2 .9 oL:~:;ro-~o_c ; : ~ ,~ ~ 8 c 'E ~ :>lJ)...... ro ~Q;"O .Q ro lJ) .!e C -' 0 > roL:Q)L:~ro"O .9 "0 0.:5 ~ .9 ,g '0 g' ,!:; coQ) ,S:Q)t::~c ro::J>("):>Em Q) ot;~ >-.g E Q) gj E Q)c......~ oL: a. '9' 00 lJ) L: Q; 0 Q) ro .Q 0.- I ::JE 0) e>"O :5 '(3 Q)> ..... c ,- ro C ::J Q) iijo......I-ro.9t;Q)Q) Q) C ~ 0 ro ro ,!:; ... 0 .p ~ C ,~...... Q) ,- 0> Q) 0) en __ooc ...... >c ...... ... 0 C C C Q) ,_ Q) ~ 0 a. 'in ~ ~ ~ lJ) ~ g '~:E ,!e '5 "0 'in Q) ro 0 ... e ~ L: ,- 0 Q) L: ... a. a....... ~ 0 ...... ... ...... ,!e 0 en lJ) Q) >- lJ) Q) >- lJ) Q) >- lJ) Q) >- <Ii a. a. o L: enQ) ~E~ ~mU5 ~o"E >-Q)(") OON ro-"", U5:g("):2 oe:s.Q g ~ ~ '0 ,!:,2 ::J 0 <0 zcoE"", <0 C o .90 ~ 0)0 m ,!:; Z 0 .- E:::: g C rooa;> o LL5(") C - 0 <0 ,2> ~ ~ 0 "'" =<erolJ)'L:' olJ)..alJ)Q) O"'"OQ)..a "0 ~ 5 ,!:; E ~Eo~~ owescoo ..... ro ~ ~ ,~ a:: -0) Q) >.Q)C Q) E ~E (/).!B _.o~ Bc ~roa. Q) 0= '0 ,~E (/)N a.=Q) Q)"-~E-c 0 o >.= ~"S~a. 0>2{i1 0.0 Q)roa.a.E3':~ 3': E ro -.... Q) ,- 0 ~ 0 .E (/)~Q)(/)O>(/) >.....:5rooQ) "",a.. __Q) ..::::a.Q)~-c"" cro~oQ):; Q;(ij"OE~ro 03':"S 3': (/)0 C _ 0 C Q) .... o C 3': ,- Q) 0 ~Q)-~.::-(/) Q)E -c>.Q) 3': 3l"': oco. Q)ro80roro (J)'Oli=li=.....~ o Z E [j] 10 101'- 0(<) 1'-0> I (<) <0 '<t ..- o I'- N ..- <0 CO I .... (<) Q) N<O~_ ~'<tg~ Q)(j)~en ~~ffi.s O(J)(J)W CO 0> ..... o o 6c ..c:: U:g(/)~~.s (/)Q) :;:-cc:w ~ ~ g- ~ 2 'iij C ro(/)> ..... (/) '(5"~ a. (/)0 ~ C C .... ro Q) (/) Q) .21 a. 0..0 6 O..c::(/)(/)(/)-C:P ul-~i::;:"SO C ,ro~~O~ ,~ ~ ~ Q) E ~ Q) ti .~ fJ) ..c <IJ Q) ~ ~~e~~Q)!O Q)....O ,0.:5_ a.~ ~~~ ~~ >.~..c::ro""'c31 ffig,6~-g~_32 ~ 6 :!li ~ ro roE.... ; ~ (/) -0 ,~ U ~ ~..:: - Q)o~- >.ro 0_ .....~ro>, C rooes2 0.3': ~(j) :2 ,~ E C E ..c:: (/) Q) ~ ~ [j] '~ 8 ~ ~ ~ o Z Q) ro ~~ iO'~- Q) C ....., Q) 3': g, (J) ~ o(/) ~~ :5Q)-Ec ..... ,- 0 ~ >. - 0 o>..c:: -0 ~.... .~ 0 ro W c~rooo (/) > ~ 'E c ..c:: >. (/) ro ~ (/) ~ ';::: Q)> Q) ~ ~ (/) 1: TI C'" >U ~ _ .....v 0 ,- 0) 0 ..... LL ::: - ~ 3': .0 ,~ 'i:: :0 ~ 'O..c::a.i3':~ a...c::Q)c_ - ~_-c ~I-..c:: 0 (/) ..c:: I'- Q) ,- Q) - ,- -e N ~ Q) rn ,~~ (/) t) iO' gQ)(/)'::-Q):s::-o~~23': (/):5 [(J) C 0-'::- 000 Q) Q)~Q)c..c::EO 5..(J).o6c :gQ)-oow_ ~_-cQ)oo :5~EQ)~ ".m~~:5(/)~,2_ _ 0 0 (/) E !!!. (/),~ C o N I'- 5 (/) =Q) Q)(/) ,~ Q) '0 (/)Q) O',~ 3': C ..- ,- ..c:: 0 - 0 _3': Q)::c: E o:g:E15 8 Q) >.- .s ~.o Q) Q) ~..c:: 0 _ ro :g ~ ,~ ~ >.'~ EE ~ ~ ~Q) ~ 00 .Q B Q) ,Q) .....-c ~>Q) EOO>,.o(/)..c:: >UoQ)~o--C c..c- (/)- -firo~~o..g-~roQ)~~~~~ ~ :5 <( 5 ,~ ~ g, ~ ~ [ ~ ~ 16 ffi -0 2 (/) ~ :g 0.'::- (/) Q) Q) > Q):p l:; ~ Q) 8 O>Q) ,21-0 .0 Q) ~~ (/) o - Q) ~ o Z o Z (/) Q) >- (/) Q) >- 0> o '<t 0> o '<t Q) c ro ...J c .... o Q) ~ ,~ ~a:: c 0> <( ,~ .... -.:::: Q) ro a. W .~ ...:..c:: ~~ o ..- C Q) o C ~ ro Q)...J -g .... <( ,~ cja:: >.0> o ,~ fij CD z,~ , ..c:: :g~ ('oJ ..- Q) (j) Q) en () -e Q) .0 o a:: ..- ..- ..... Q) ro > o E........ Cl C '00 III ..... - :J U ro 0 ' ,!:; ,Q Ill'" OUJ.2roULDo1601ll0Q)2 LD Cl Q) e Q)O ?-:E 0 Cl '> ..... ~ Q) III ?- C U ;; ro'" ,- 0 Q) a. c ;; ';:: - ro ~ I ~ III E 0 LD ~ 0:> I :J ,~ ..... a. >. III 0 C ;::.....c ';:: 0 U ,~ ~ Q) -g ro ~ ~ 0 ::= ~ UJ c Oc!Sc:S:: _.oro3=>.U..cI u8 ~ ,~ ~ ~ 5l ~ -a,.o ~ :5 U -g c U ro ,- ..c ~ - ro ,- ro Q) 0 c 0 ro 0 E ,;:: ..... III ro E ..c III ..... III ro ..c III 0 C 0 Cl ,- en ro ro Q) 0> c 0 III ..c Q) CO:Jc........32co.oeO o -g '(3 LD E ~ ~ ~ -g 'E :~ ..c c.9 .0 Eroro?- Q)........:J>Cl..c 0::: ;; Q) Q) Cl..... 0 ..... ,- '(j) E Cl e g I I U .s ... (j) E U 0 c i= '(j) .... ro....Q)CIllC....III c .~ ~ 5 0c!S 13 0 a:; ,Q ~ ro 0 :.c Q) Q) :s:: I :OJ ~ .Q Q) U ,~ Q) 0 C ..... III .s ~ .... g ro .0 :Q 0 ,;:: .0 LD ,Q g> '5 .... ..... 0 ~ E ro III ~ 0 en ?- 1:) '00 C 0 ~CIIlCUCOO>:J;;Q):JuQ) 0:> 0 C Q) C Cii ,- C E I ~ .0 C ro en 13 8 0 ro en 1:) '00 C 2 ro ro 3= ro Q) ..... ..... U ro Q) :J ,~ 0 C U g ro UJ III Q) ro Q) Q) ~ E :t:: ..... ,- ,- :t:: ... Q) C III Q) ro III Q) 0 ro Q) QjQ)...ClOQ).....O...ro..c~...ro a:: C en 'Ill 0 .s C ~ I- Q)..... ..... ..... Q) Q) Q) ..... ... :J..... ...(j) a.~ (j) ro ~o ro..... c.9..... lOP City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator @ FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Trunk Highway 3/195th Street Intersection Control - Funding DATE: August 21,2006 INTRODUCTION As part of the NewlandlFairhill development, an analysis of the future full access intersections along Trunk Highway 3 at I95th Street and the two other proposed locations is in process. Staff has been working with the developer and MnDOT to identify intersection control improvements that will be needed at those locations. DISCUSSION A draft Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) has been submitted to MnDOT for review. The ICE indicates that roundabouts are appropriate intersection control improvements for the intersections in question, including the intersection ofTH 3 and 195th Street. It is the understanding that MnDOT will want roundabouts at these intersections. Installation of the intersection control at 195th Street and TH3 is planned for next year with the start up of the NewlandlFairhill development. As such, the City has the opportunity to apply for MnDOT Cooperative Agreement funds to help fund the installation of the roundabout. In the past the City has received Cooperative Agreement funds for the signal addition on the east leg of the TH3/Elm Street intersection and the "backage" road in front of Glenview Townhomes. As part of the application for the Cooperative Agreement funds, the Council would need to pass a resolution requesting funding for the project. The deadline for application is October I, 2006. If awarded, the funds are made available July I, 2007. BUDGET IMPACT To be determined. Up to $550,000 could be awarded by MnDOT for the project through the Cooperative Agreement Program. ACTION REQUESTED Authorize by motion, for staff to prepare an application to MnDOT to receive Cooperative Agreement funds for a project that would install a roundabout at the intersection of TH 3 and 19Sth Street. The resolution needed for the application would be brought back to the City Council in September. Respectfully Submitted, ~M~ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file Krista Flemming, Newland Communities I/a- City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter J. Herlofsky, Jr. City Administrator SUBJECT: City Hall Project DATE: August 21,2006 DISCUSSION Attached is the schematic design submittal for the new City Hall. ACTION REQUESTED The action requested is to approve the schematic design submittal and direct staff to proceed. Respectfully submitted, ;.1 ".......... ..1'1 ,//'"'/ .~/ --'-, l / / '. .' I I \,.../ W---J;e '--Peter J. Herlofs10', 1r. J City Adminis~tor :/ /:/ 1(// CMuller/Herlofsky/Council 'Y1emos/City Hall Project ~ity of Farmington New City Hall Schematic Design Submittal City of Farmington Farmington, Minnesota August 15, 2006 s: \CI -FARMING TON\06 204 7\SD\SD OOQK'6DCO\IERDVlG ( :ornrni~;~;ion No. lJ(iL047 City of FarminQton New City Hall - Schematic Design Submittal Draft Wold Architects and EnQineers August 15, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS PaQe Introduction 2 Values/Principles 3 Program 4-6 Site Forces 7 Context Study 8 Floor Plan 9-10 Site Plan 11 Building Image 12 Schedule 13 Cost Analysis / Budget 14 o Page 1 Commission No, 062047 City of Farminaton New City Hall - Schematic Design Submittal Draft Wold Architects and Enaineers August 15, 2006 INTRODUCTION Wold Architects and Engineers is pleased to submit to the City Council, staff and community of the City of Farmington, the Schematic Design Requirements for the New Farmington City Hall Project. We wish to thank the City of Farmington, and the Project Planning Committee for their exhaustive efforts in providing the Design Team the informat:on necessary to advance to this stage of development in a timely fashion. The Design Team will commence the Design Development Phase of this project upon the Schematic Design approval by the City Council. Thank you for your consideration of this design presentation. John McNamara, AlA Associate Wold Architects and Engineers o SM/CI Jarmington/06204 7/rpts/SD _ Book Page 2 Commission No. 062047 City of Farmington New City Hall - Schematic Design Submittal Draft Wold Architects and Engineers August 15, 2006 VALUESI PRINCIPLES City of Farmington Mission Statement "Through Teamwork and Cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future." Value Statements · Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services · Fiscal Responsibility · Ethics and Integrity · Open and Honest Communication · Cooperation and Teamwork · Visionary Leadership and Planning . Positive Relations with the Community · Professionalism Facilitv Guidina Principles · City Hall shall be located in downtown · City Hall shall serve as an anchor to the existing downtown and the new Spruce Street Corridor · The building shall allow for future growth of at least 20 years and be expandable · The building shall be multi-level . Preservation and appropriate Farmington Image - Complementary to Downtown AND/OR - Set a new standard for downtown · Strengthen the downtown neighborhood · Costcappropriate and sustainable SM/CI J armington/062047 /rpts/SD _ Book Page 3 Commission No, 062047 City of Farmington Wold Architects and Engineers New City Hall - Schematic Design Submittal Draft August 15,2006 Staff Program Staff Program 2020 2020 2030 2030 *Schematic Revised Revised Revised Revised Design Administration City Administrator 1 250 SF 1 250 SF 250 SF Administrative Services Director 1 180 SF 1 180 SF 180 SF Executive Assistant 1 80 SF 1 80 SF 80 SF Records Clerk 1 64 SF 1 64 SF 64 SF Receptionist (Shared Space) 3 200 SF 3 200 SF 240 SF Communications Specialist 1 64 SF 2 128 SF 128 SF Administrative Support 1 64 SF 1 64 SF 64 SF File Storage 0 180 SF 0 180 SF 200 SF Copy Room (Shared w/ Finance & HR) 0 200 SF 0 200 SF 250 SF Conference Room 0 350 SF 0 350 SF 540 SF Subtotal Administration 9 1,632 SF 10 1,696 SF 1,996 SF Department Net to Gross Factor x 1,60 x 1.55 x 1,35 Total Gross Sq Ftg Administration 2,611 SF 2,629 SF 2,700 SF Finance Finance Director 1 180 SF 1 180 SF 180 SF Assistant Finance Director 1 80 SF 1 80 SF 80 SF Utility Billing Clerk 2 128 SF 2 128 SF 128 SF Administrative Support 1 64 SF 1 64 SF 64 SF Accountant 1 64 SF 2 128 SF 128 SF Accounting Technicians 2 128 SF 2 128 SF 128 SF Payroll (moved to HR) 0 o SF 0 o SF o SF File Storage 0 180 SF 0 180 SF 200 SF Conference Room 0 350 SF 0 350 SF 420 SF Subtotal Finance 8 1174 SF 9 1238 SF 1 ,328 SF Department Net to Gross Factor x 1.60 x 1.55 x 1,35 Total Gross Sq Ftg Finance 1,878 SF 1,919 SF 1,800 SF Human Resources Human Resources Director 1 180 SF 1 180 SF 180 SF Human Resources Assistant 1 120 SF 1 120 SF 80 SF IT Manager/ Supervisor (1@120SF) 1 120 SF 1 120 SF 120 SF IT Specialist 1 80 SF 2 160 SF 160 SF Payroll Technician (moved from Finance) 1 64 SF 1 64 SF 64 SF Website Designer/ Technician 1 80 SF 1 80 SF 80 SF Safety Coordinator 0 o SF 1 80 SF 80 SF Administrative Support 0 o SF 1 64 SF 64 SF Computer Room/ Set-Up/ Server 0 150 SF 0 150 SF 170 SF Conference Room (2@175) 0 350 SF 0 350 SF 350 SF File Storage 0 180 SF 0 180 SF 200 SF Subtotal Human Resources 6 1,324 SF 9 1,548 SF 1,548 SF Department Net to Gross Factor x 1,60 x 1,55 x 1,60 Total Gross Sq Ftg Human Resources 2,118 SF 2,399 SF 2,500 SF *Schematic Design Submittal reflects 2030 staffing needs SM/CIJarmingtonJ062047/rpts/Revised PF<ogram Summary Page 4 Commission No, 062047 City of Farmington Wold Architects and Engineers New City Hall - Schematic Design Submittal Draft August 15, 2006 Staff Program Staff Program 2020 2020 2030 2030 *Schematic Revised Revised Revised Revised Design Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Director 1 180 SF 1 180 SF 180 SF Assistant Parks and Recreation Director 1 120 SF 1 120 SF 120 SF Recreation Supervisor (Existing: 1@ 96SF) 2 120 SF 2 120 SF 240 SF Recreation Programmer (4@ 64SF) 4 256 SF 4 256 SF 240 SF Administrative Support 1 64 SF 1 64 SF 64 SF Seasonal Staff Workspace 4 240 SF 4 240 SF 128 SF Equipment Storage 0 250 SF 0 250 SF 300 SF Multi-Purpose Room 0 350 SF 0 350 SF 360 SF Conference Room 0 120 SF 0 120 SF 120 SF Natural Resources Staff (moved to Engineering) 0 o SF 0 o SF o SF Parks and Recreation Storage I Work Room 0 350 SF 0 350 SF 200 SF Subtotal Parks and Recreation 13 2,050 SF 13 2,050 SF 1,952 SF Department Net to Gross Factor x 1,60 x 1.55 x 1,35 Total Gross Sq Ftg Parks and Recreation 3,280 SF 3,178 SF 2,625 SF Community Development Community Director 1 180 SF 1 180 SF 180 SF Planning and Zoning (2@ 120SF) Existing:(2@ 112SF) 2 240 SF 2 240 SF 240 SF Planning and Zoning (2@ 80SF) 2 160 SF 2 160 SF 160 SF Building Official 1 120 SF 1 120 SF 120 SF Building Inspector (4@ 64SF) Ex. 3@ 60SF) 4 256 SF 4 256 SF 256 SF Administrative Support (Existing 2 share 125SF) 2 128 SF 3 192 SF 192 SF Economic Development Specialist 1 80 SF 1 80 SF 80 SF Code Enforcement Officer 1 64 SF 2 128 SF 128 SF Filel Work Space 0 200 SF 0 200 SF 200 SF Conference Room 0 350 SF 0 350 SF 350 SF Mud Rooml Changing Room 0 120 SF 0 120 SF 150 SF Subtotal Community Development 14 1 ,898 SF 16 2,026 SF 2,056 SF Department Net to Gross Factor x 1,60 x 1.55 x 1,35 Total Gross Sq Ftg Community Development 3,037 SF 3,140 SF 2,775 SF Enaineering City Engineer 1 180 SF 1 180 SF 180 SF Assistant City Engineer 1 120 SF 1 120 SF 120 SF Civil Engineer (2@ 80SF) Existing: 2@ 112SF 2 160 SF 2 160 SF 240 SF Engineering Technician (3@ 120SF) 3 360 SF 3 360 SF 360 SF Natural Resource Specialist (2@ 80SF) 2 160 SF 2 160 SF 160 SF Administrative Support 2 128 SF 2 128 SF 128 SF Interns 3 120 SF 3 120 SF o SF GIS Specialist 1 64 SF 1 64 SF 64 SF Storage 0 250 SF 0 250 SF 200 SF Filel Work Space 0 200 SF 0 200 SF 200 SF Copyl Work Room (Shared wi P/R and P/Z) 0 200 SF 0 200 SF 250 SF Conference Room 0 350 SF 0 350 SF 360 SF Subtotal Engineering 15 2,292 SF 15 2,292 SF 2,262 SF Department Net to Gross Factor x 1,60 x 1,55 x 1,35 Total Gross Square Footage Engineering 3,667 SF 3,553 SF 3,050 SF 'Schematic Design Submittal reflects 2030 staffing needs SM/CI._Farmington/062047/rpts/Rev,sed PRogram Summary Page 5 Commission No. 062047 ---------- City of Farmington Wold Architects and Engineers New City Hall - Schematic Design Submittal Draft August 15,2006 Staff Program Staff Program 2020 2020 2030 2030 *Schematic Revised Revised Revised Revised Design Shared Spaces Conference Room "A" 0 350 SF 0 350 SF 550 SF Conference Room "8" 0 350 SF 0 350 SF 750 SF Council Room 0 2,500 SF 0 2,500 SF 2,300 SF Kitchen/ Lunch Room 0 600 SF 0 600 SF 800 SF Public Lobby 0 1,500 SF 0 1,500 SF 2,900 SF Lactation/Quiet/Soft Conference Room 0 120 SF 0 120 SF 120 SF Public Restrooms (2@ 330SF) 0 660 SF 0 660 SF 400 SF Staff Restrooms (2@ 120SF) 0 240 SF 0 240 SF 256 SF Video Control Room 0 600 SF 0 600 SF 300 SF Future Space 0 1500 SF 0 1500 SF 6,575 SF Subtotal Shared Spaces 0 8,420 SF 0 8,420 SF 14,951 SF Department Net to Gross Factor x 1.60 x 1,55 x 1.35 Total Gross Square Footage Shared Spaces 13,472 SF 13,051 20,190 SF Building Subtotal 65 30,064 SF 72 29,869 SF 35,640 SF Net to Gross Factor (Circulation and Mechanical) x 1.25 x 1,25 x 1,18 Total Gross Square Footage 37,580 SF 37,336 SF 42,055 SF *Schematic Design Submittal reflects 2030 staffing needs SM/CI_Farmington/062047/rpts/Revised PRogram Summary Page 6 Commission No. 062047 City of Farminaton New City Hall - Schematic Design Submittal Draft Wold Architects and EnQineers August 15, 2006 SITE FORCES T J;~ ~ TO FlJTURE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT -. ... IJ) r--Bas T1NG RAJ1. LINE ~ .- -~ I ' 4: I : IQ ~ PARKING : 0;"'--' -. : \Q>I J: ,_ox "'...""'" '-..--.--______..!::~:~~~--.-.--.-.--...-" ,:,,_..... ,..mu'i i ~ 0 ~ q 1 q r-L 'Onf ~~~~--.-..>.--.--..-j . mm :~m 0'1'; \ J, HI!' r---l . S~~~!@ j '=r .--' ~","';!i',..,.:,..h If, I:,' ! ',I : i j Ii . . i ~ . L, '1'-1 I ' Ir-~ ,~____ __m___~~;'._ . j . - , . I : L.-L.I-- '" ~;;;;:;~:\ \ =.. <?' MAIN APPROACH AREA oF ri!TD~t l ,- -~lf'~~~ n ~1 ~l] (3RDS:b",l-,,~,lf?:m I (8) I ~ ~ ] i ,--.J - LJ n L~ _--3 [_~"';mm u ~[:J 'I ! ,LBf?~~L t: t-l. '?FEr' ! :: : I.~.. " I ~ @ I I t u /.TH STREET rJ ~ 24' 96' ~. 0' 48' 192' SM/CI Jarmington/06204 7/rpts/SD _ Book Page 7 Commission No, 062047 ----~- T s ! i L.. IJ) ,nr-- J: L rrJ 1 [] c 1 TO HIGHHA Y 3 336' (]'\ N \-1'/ City of FarminQton New City Hall - Schematic Design Submittal Draft Wold Architects and EnQineers August 15, 2006 CONTEXT STUDY MASSING STUDY kncJge: Massing of Downtown r armington ~ ~ Concept: Concepta: -Multiple storefronts within a block -Voried Heights of masses within one black -Minimal sep<lrotion between storefronts 1 -con.istant Iacotion of base lhnlUCJhout black 1 -voried width of storefronts -lorger IYondows on Lower Level -Smaller IYmdows _ ~~~..~ \ rlEf3~~ I Demonslrotion af Concepl Demonstration al Concept 1 1 u~i:.~ Demonstrotion of ConC"JlI reloti.. to Oemonstrolion of Concept rekrtive ta Floor Plan Floor Pion ~ ~ o Interpretation of Downtown Massing Relotive to New City Holt pton SM/CI J armington/06204 7 /rpts/SD _ Book Page 8 Commission No. 062047 (/) co 0 a... 0 (1) (1) '" c: L.{) T""" c: - W rJ) ::J "'C en c: ::J C'Q <( -G z IV - EB :.c ~ <( "'C '0 Co == L.{) N C"') 0> Q) C'l ell Co a.. T""" Co ~ b >-w O::u <(Z ~(2 01- uz Ww en r. - -.- - - I I I ) I I. I I I. I I I. I u.:~u. ~__ zgU) 8a:~ , u. UU) ~~ w~ a:u. WU) =5\ gM Uw W<.:>u. ~~U) ""'08 a:f-M <(U) Q. ~, (~ ~~ 00 u~ U) ~O::::l.L UWU) z"'o =>::2'0 O<M UIN U c.: 5w O<.:>u. w~U) ~~g t5U) > u. "U) o ~ o , u. !!;:U) 05\ u"' :< Ou. OU) a:o 0"' =>~ ::2' ou. wU) 00 5g I I I I I I I I I I __.J w u ZZ <((2 :2:1- Z W w <.:>u. ~U) 08 f-N U) :r:6t ~~ f-~ '" a: owu. :;:uU) -ti:g ~U)N u:: ~~~ 8~~ ~~ :::>-1 0...0... :r:6t ~~ f-~ ~~~ , ,u. UQ.U) W=>o crCf.)~ I- 0:::> wO enCXJ 0<( 0...0 OZ 0:::::> 0...0 0:: ~0~ -Zo uw~ 4:: ~ CO .... 0 "' CO oil E oil E '" .0 8 ::J N en e <Xl c en ~ "en Q) 0 ~ U Q :;::; D "' CO ~ E c: Q) Z ~ 0 .c :5 ~ u - en c.. D c: ;!l ...J D E CO w ;{l a... :c > C\ C'Q N LL. ~ W ~ - (3 ...J a 0 Z ~ ~ <( 'i' '" Q) <{ U z :!!: '7 ;i .Ii lII<O _0 Q)O Q)('\/ .5 L6 ~ c W 't:J C co 1II - (.) Q) - :c ~ <( "C '0 3: - 1II ~ O'l ~ or::( z EB (0 LO ('\/ C'0 0 ..- Q) OJ (0 co ~ 0... Co '<:t 0 ...J <( U Z <( I U W ::; z wO ~~ ::J<( "-~ W z ~ WOO ____~~u:l ___ CD ",,- ~oo ~g g~ z ~ WOO ~I-m CD W ,,"- ~oo 08 ....'" 00 u.:~1..l- ~8~ ua:::~ u.::!:1.L ZoOO 000 ua:::~ z w"'''- ILliOO ~a::8 S2coCO ~9 ~~ ;:0 Il.'" 0'" U W ,,"- ~oo 08 ....'" 00 u.:~LL zoOO 000 oa::~ o . 2. "- -o:::w :2-0 00", <( - u.:~u.. ZoOO 000 ua::~ W u"- za::OO ~og "- ~ ii::u.:u. o ZOO >-00 ~u~ >-2."- ....-00 -:20 uo", <('" , "- et::o:::C/) :io~ 4= @ 0 ro ~ ~ E .0 ~ !!l C/) :fi r:::::: ~ .2> ~ ~ 0 ~ (.) 0 ~ ~ Ctl E z r:::::: Q) :s ~ 0 13 - C/) Q. ~ ...J I w > W ...J a:: I w Q. 15 a.. N '" .., ~ 0 ~ SO '" ~ ;J Ji IIlm "'0 0)0 O)N t: .- L{)- t:..- W- III "C ::J t: 0) ca ::J 1Il<( - o 0) - :E ~ < "C o 3: t: o - t: E CO ~I LL~ - .- oU 3: .- CD UZ z :3 Q. W !:: en ( I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I , , I I I I i I I I I I I I I , I I I I , I --- , J I I I I I I I I I I; Ii Ii I F II.!) I!~~ I,'DC m (if ~ ! Iii (h 'i lJj _ t!~ '= ,V) ( I' I I I I I I I I I Ii I I I , I.!) ~\f) UUj DC\,.) [[[[ !LV) !LlI) ~";t V)'-=- r [ L / \- UJ UJ OC \- \.f) D OC ('() L DO LU ~)L <:z ::c< 0[C\ G) 1~~~1 S ~VO I c c ~---- 11== /r- i r---- h f\AiS'\,/ ,^,<A,;.' 1(-/1 ^,', ',/ L/ \ '/, ' ,)< , / 1 "- --\c,/ ,.,,- - ~.,-.;)- - - """":--,-f- - - ~)-- t-- I I I J 't-- ,/ I ~ If) l~~~lS ~')n~dS s( - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --l ,.-,',-\ -------------,\ \ I I: () () ~ 11) N () o ..- ..- Q) OJ co a.. ~ D z <{ ~ ;B ~ D ~ D ~ ~ N '" ~ f! ~ " '" ~ ;J Ji City of Farmington New City Hall Wold Architects and Engineers August 8, 2006 BUILDING IMAGE Page 12 Commission No, 062047 City of Farmington - New City Hall Schematic Design Wold Architects and Engineers August 15, 2006 IUJ~LDI 2006 2007 2008 J F M p., M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S o N D J F M A M J J Schematic Design II 1 - City Council Approval August21,2006 Design Development I I I - City Council Approval ~ ~ October 30, 2006 Contract Documents - City Council Approval ....j ~ April 2, 2007 Bidding I I I I - City Council Approval .... ~ May 7,2007 (Award Bids) of bids Construction Substantial Completion * _ Design I Construction Documents _ Construction I Bidding * Occupancy o Page 13 . 08/15/06 17:44 FAX 651 223 5646 City of Farmington ~ New City Hall Schematic Design Cost Summary Construction Costs Site Development Building Construction Mechanical Electrical Total Construction Cost Proiect Costs Site Acquisition Demolition at 3rd & Spruce Architectural Fees Architectural Reimb. Bid Set Printing Geotechnical Survey Special Testing Furniture Equipment Move Cost Builders Risk Insurance Bonding Construction Contingency Total Project Costs Total Project Cost Potential Additional Proiect Costs WOLD ARCHITECTS Cost! SF $ 12.50 Isf $ 106.00 Isf $ 33.50 Isf $ 17.00 Isf $ 169.00 Isf Sale of existing City Hall Streetscape/ Round About (Allowance) ~001 Wold Architects and Engineers August 15. 2006 Full SJt~ Utilization Schematic Schematic Design Design 4-11-06 8-15~06 36.000 SF 42,000 SF $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 4,350,000 $ 4,429,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,407,000 $ 600.000 $ 714,000 $ 6,600.000 $ 7.000,000 $ 258.000 $ 258,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 414,000 $ 442,500 $ 28,000 $ 36,000 $ 25.000 $ 25,000 $ 12,000 $ 9.500 $ 8,000 $ 5,000 $ 18,000 $ 27,000 $ 400,000 $ 400.000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 660,000 $ 700.000 $ 2,063,000 $ 2,143.000 $ 8,663,000 $ 9.143,000 Deduct $ (533,000) Add $ 200,000 Commission No. 042061 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (65 I) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us //6 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter Herlofsky SUBJECT: GIS DATE: August 21,2006 Lee Smick has provided some attachments and will be providing a presentation at the City Council Meeting on August 21, 2006 for review of the options provided which include Bonestroo, Logis and Dakota County. My recommendation is for us to proceed with the arrangement with Dakota County with a cost of approximately $6,000 for the remaining portion of this year and an amount less than $20,000 in 2007. This will allow us to accomplish a variety of tasks in a much more efficient way which includes even some auditing issues that were required by the GASB regulations and also a major assist in the comprehensive plan process. In the 2007 budget, much of the consulting work has been removed from the line items in departments. Especially with requirements for the comprehensive plan the assistance through Dakota County and some ofthe things we can learn from other neighboring cities will be very helpful and save us a lot of time and effort and especially cost when it comes to working with consultants. ~imitted( ~/-1f~. Jil Peter J. Herlofsky, Jr.~ / City Administrator \ CMuller/Herlofsky/Council Memos/GIS City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us )//; TO: Mayor, Council Members, lip c..... City Administrator (J Lee Smick, AICP City Planner FROM: SUBJECT: GIS Presentation DATE: August 21,2006 INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION City staff has been undergoing a series of discussions concerning the City's current GIS (Geographic Information System) situation and the opportunities that the City could choose in the future. The City has recently met with three companies to discuss the City's future GIS needs, opportunities for website applications, and assistance with maintaining and overseeing the City's GIS applications. The three companies included Bonestroo-DSU, LOGIS, and the Dakota County GIS Department. City staff will present its findings at the Council meeting on August 21 st. ACTION REQUESTED Comment on the presentation and suggest improvements or needs for the City's GIS system. Respectf;l~~mi~ ~~ -- Lee Smick, AICP --- City Planner City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us /IC/ TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator (j FROM: Lee Smick, AICP City Planner SUBJECT: Review/Approve Responses to Comments and Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan -SeedlGenstar AUAR Update DATE: August 21,2006 INTRODUCTION/DISCUSSION The City of Farmington and Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates have recently completed the SeedlGenstar AUAR Update. Comments on the Update have been received from several agencies. An Update differs from the original AUAR in that the city may approve the Update unless there are Objections to the update. The City is not required to respond to other comments, but may choose to do so. The Final AUAR [Alternative Urban Areawide Review] Update and Mitigation Plan for the SeedlGenstar property is being presented to the City Council for its review and approval. No objections to this approval were identified by the reviewing agencies. Responses to Comments The following agencies submitted comments to the City concerning the Farmington Spruce Street AUAR (see attached): Metropolitan Council Minnesota Department of Transportation Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District Agency comments focused on the potential extension of Diamond Path Road and a second bridge over North Creek. The AUAR Update noted that this potential extension is a concept included in the City's Comprehensive Plan, but is not scheduled to be implemented until after 2014. The City may wish to respond to the agency comments to indicate that the Diamond Path extension is a concept only, and that no final route or design has been completed for the extension. Therefore, it is not possible to identify potential wetland or floodplain impacts at this time, or determine required mitigation. If the City determines that it will move forward with the extension, the City will include the proposed route, design, and mitigation analysis in a future AUAR Update. Updates are required every five years. The City will consider the comments provided by reviewing agencies for this Update if it moves forward with the plans for the Diamond Path extension in the future. Staff requests that the City Council consider whether responses should be provided to the comments on the update, and how the City wishes to respond. If responses are desired, the Council may direct staff to mail the responses to comments to the agencies. As no objections to the Update have been received, the Council may approve the AUAR Update and complete the review process. Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan The original order for an environmental review of the Seed/Genstar AUAR was approved by the City Council on July 15, 2002. The property encompasses approximately 965 acres west ofTH 3 and north of I 941h Street. A draft of the AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan was approved by the City Council on July 17, 2006 and the comment period for agencies to review the plan ended on August II, 2006. RECOMMENDED ACTION I. Discuss the comments, and determine whether the City staff should develop responses to the Comments and mail the responses to the agencies for their IO-day reVIew. 2. Review Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan for the Seed/Genstar AUAR Update. 3. Ask questions (if any) and/or seek clarifications (if needed). 4. Adopt motion recommending that the City Council approve the Final AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan, either (a) as is, or (b) with any additions, deletions or revisions suggested by the City Council. Respectfully Submitted, ('~ ~;k' ~ Lee Smick, AICP City Planner cc: Krista Flemming, Newland Communities 2 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING FINAL AUAR UPDATE AND MITIGATION PLAN SEED/GENST AR AREA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 21st day of August, 2006 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member _ introduced and Member _ seconded the following: WHEREAS, the Seed/Genstar Area boundaries are depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A, and; WHEREAS, the City anticipates future development to evolve over the next 15 years in the Seed/Genstar Area; and WHEREAS, the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Seed/Genstar Property was adopted on January 20,2004, and; WHEREAS, recent changes in proposed land uses and transportation networks within the Seed/Genstar Property have occurred, therefore, an update to the Final AUAR was required under the provisions of the AUAR process as described in Section 4410.3610 of the EQB Rules, and; WHEREAS, the City approved a draft of the AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan of Seed/Genstar Area on July 17, 2006; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Farmington City Council hereby approves the Final AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan of the Seed/Genstar Area consistent with the intents and purposes of the Rules of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board under the provisions for Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). The following conditions shall govern this review: 1. The specific boundaries of the Seed/Genstar Area for review under the AUAR are depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 21 sl day of August, 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of August, 2006. City Administrator II tXfh f9, IJ. II II II N II W*E II II S II II II ., II II II II 1/ I~ II " I~ -n I~ I~ II II jl jl Jl II II II '1" ~194th 5tW " II J..J n=roo II::. AnderIik & U AssocIates Engineen & AnhitKts Ci) City of Fannington Seed-Genstar AUAR-Update Existing Zoning II II o Agriculture o Conservancy ~ 100-Year Floodplain II II N Study Area Boundary N City Boundary N Railroad N Parcel Base Map Feet II 1200 o 1200 Figure 5-3 II April 2006 k:\ 141 \141 05264\gis\avprojects\auar-updale,apr II II II City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us lie! FROM: Mayor, Council Mem~, City Administrator \J Lee Smick, AICP City Planner Iff L-- TO: SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - Approve New High School EA W DATE: August 21,2006 INTRODUCTION An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) was prepared for the Farmington Area High School project pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes. DISCUSSION The EA W is a document prepared in a worksheet format that is designed as a streamlined assessment approach to determine the environmental effects that may be associated with a proposed project. The EA W serves primarily to aid in the determination of whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed for a proposed project and secondarily serves as a basis to begin the scoping process for an EIS. The EA W review was triggered for the Farmington Area High School project because the project consists of the construction of an institutional facility. In the EA W process, the EQB assigns to the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) the responsibility of verifying the accuracy of environmental documents and complying with the environmental review processes in a timely manner. The RGU for the Farmington Area High School project is the Farmington City Council. Therefore, the Record of Decision is approved by the City Council through a resolution. Three types of decisions could be made concerning the EA W: I. Make a positive declaration, requiring an EIS for the project. 2. Postpone the decision because of lack of information. 3. Make a negative declaration, stating that the project does not have a potential significant environmental effect that warrants the preparation of an EIS. After a project has been filed with the Environmental Quality Board, the project is sent to agencies to review the effects of the project on the environment. The agencies have 30 days to review the \ project and make comments concerning how the project might impact the environment. The comments are then assembled by the RGU after the 30-day comment period and the RGU has 30 days to respond to the comments. In the case of the Farmington Area High School project, the comment period ended on August 2, 2006. Written comments were received from nine agencies concerning the EA W; those agencies included: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Dakota County Soil & Water Conservation District, Dakota County Office of Planning, Dakota County Office of Transportation, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; MDNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Based on the EA W, the response to comments and the Findings of Fact, the Record of Decision concludes the following: 1. The EA W was prepared in compliance with the procedures of the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act and Minnesota Rules, Parts 4410.1000 t 4410.1700 (1997). 2. The EA W satisfactorily addressed all of the issues for which existing information could have been reasonably obtained. 3. Based on the criteria established in Minnesota Rules Part 4410.1700, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 4. Based on a review of the record prepared in this matter, the City makes a "Negative Declaration," that an EIS is not required. 5. The City of Farmington is directed to maintain a Record of Decision including the Response to Comments on the EA Wand to notify in writing all persons on the EA W distribution list, all persons that commented in writing during the 30-day comment period and to any person upon written request. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt a resolution approving the Response to Comments, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision for the Farmington Area High School project. Respectfully submitted, ,~&-a Lee Smick, AICP City Planner cc: Dr. Brad Meeks, ISD #192 Superintendent Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator Joeseph Kurcinka, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Helen A. Boyer, Metropolitan Council Juanita Voight, Minnesota Department of Transportation Jim Davidson, Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District Lynn Moratzka, Dakota County - Office of Planning Suzanne Danen, Dakota County - Office of Transportation James Sullivan, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sarah Hoffinann, MDNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program Robert Whiting, Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers File RESOLUTION NO: CITY OF FAMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION DECLARING NO NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMP ACT STATEMENT FOR FARMINGTON AREA HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) was prepared for the Farmington Area High School project according to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) regulations; and WHEREAS, notice of the EA W was published in the EQB Monitor on July 3, 2006, and WHEREAS, copies of the EA W were mailed to all of the agencIes and organizations on the EQB official EA W distribution list; and WHEREAS, the thirty-day comment period for the Farmington Area High School project ended on August 2, 2006, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota that findings in the document titled "Findings of Fact Regarding a Need for Environmental Impact Statement" Farmington Area High School project, be incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a determination is hereby made that the preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project which is the subject of the EA W is not needed by an application of the following criteria to the factual information contained in the EA W: I. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects; 2. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects; 3. The extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority; and 4. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the proposer, or an EIS previously prepared on similar projects. MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Voting Yes: Voting No: Passed and adopted by the Farmington City Council this 21 st day of August, 2006. CITY OF FARMINGTON Peter J. Herlofsky City Administrator Kevan A. Soderberg Mayor FINDINGS OF FACT/RECORD OF DECISION PROPOSED FARMINGTON AREA HIGH SCHOOL FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA August 21, 2006 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ISO #192 owns 110 acres in the western portion of the City of Farmington. The School District is proposing the construction of a new high school campus including a 3-story building of approximately 450,000-470,000 square feet, various sports facilities, and supporting infrastructure. The building's initial capacity will be 2,000 students in grades nine through twelve and 185 staff. The District has master planned the site to accommodate 2,400 students and 230 staff by 2017. The construction of the new high school will begin in 2006 and be completed in 2008. Approximately 3.2 miles of Flagstaff Avenue, the major access to the site, will be reconstructed to a paved roadway. A future east-west roadway, 208th Street, designated a "collector", is proposed to connect to Cedar Avenue on the west and Pilot Knob Road on the east. The new high school will require sanitary sewer and water extensions and the development of storm water facilities. The trunk sanitary sewer connection will be extended from the existing Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sewer, located south of CSAH 50, north to 200th Street. As currently proposed, the new trunk sewer will be an 18 inch diameter pipe, sized to serve the areas adjacent to Flagstaff Avenue. The trunk sewer may be increased from the proposed 18" diameter up to a 33" diameter to expand service into an area in the City of Lakeville. The City will construct and install a dead end water main from the intersection of CSAH 50 and Pilot Knob Road to the south entryway to the school. The construction will consist of a 16" main running along CSAH 50 and an 18" main running north on Flagstaff Avenue. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION The City of Farmington is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for the proposed Farmington Area High School Project, in the City of Farmington. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared for the proposed project in accordance with the Environmental Review Program of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (MEQB). The EAW was filed with the EQB and circulated for review and comment to all parties on the Minnesota Environmental Review Program distribution list. The EAW published in the EQB Monitor on July 3, 2006, and a press release was provided to the local newspaper. The thirty-day public comment period ended August 2, 2006. All comments received were considered in determining the potential for significant environmental impacts as a result of the proposed project. Written comments received on the proposed project are responded to in the separate Response to Comments. 3. CRITERIA A. Type, Extent, and Reversibility of Impacts The EAW describes the project and adequately identifies and analyzes the possible environmental impacts associated with the project. The results of this analysis are that no irreversible adverse environmental impacts will occur as a result of this project. B. Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects The proposed project will not result in cumulative environmental effects not already guided by the City's existing Comprehensive Plan. Future projects or related development are not associated with the project. C. Extent to Which Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation by Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority The City of Farmington, Dakota County, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources will maintain ongoing authority over the project as a result of permit applications. D. Extent to Which Environmental Effects Can Be Anticipated and Controlled as a Result of Other Environmental Studies Environmental effects have been predicted and planned for in the City's Surface Water Management Plan, which was prepared previous to the proposed project. No other environmental studies have been performed. 4. COMMENTS RECEIVED Written comments were received from nine agencies on the EAW distribution list, which are listed below. No comments were received from the general public. Specific responses to agency comments are contained in the separate Response to Comments document. A. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Natural Heritaae and Nonaame Research Proaram. July 25. 2006 B. Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. July 20.2006. C. Department of the Army. Corps of Enaineers. July 21.2006. D. Dakota County Transportation. July 27.2006. E. Metropolitan Council. July 29. 2006. F. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Auaust 2.2006. G. Minnesota Pollution Control Aaency (MPCA). Auaust 2. 2006. H. Dakota County Office of Plannina. Auaust 2. 2006. I. Minnesota Department of Transportation. Auaust 3. 2006. CONCLUSION The City of Farmington, acting as the Responsible Governmental Unit, makes a negative declaration. The proposed project does not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement. Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator City of Farmington Date Response to Comments Farmington High School EA W The following comments were received regarding the Environmental Assessment Worksheet prepared for the Farmington High School project. Comments are listed under the heading of the commenting agency in italics. A response in regular type follows each comment. In order to facilitate efficient review by the commenting agencies, the format of the agency's comments is preserved to the extent possible. u.S. Army Corps of Engineers USACOE Comments: Our preliminary jurisdictional determination is that there are waters of the U.S. present at this development site.....If future project plans propose filling wetlands at this site, please submit a completed permit application and a delineation report that includes all appropriate documentation including data sheets. It is recommended that the delineated wetland boundary be surveyed and identified on any development plans prepared for this property. Response: A wetland determination was completed at the school property and no jurisdictional wetlands were identified. The determination was approved by the City of Farmington as the Local Government Unit (LGU) for the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) March 24,2005. As indicated in the EA W under Item 12, wetland impacts are expected to occur during road (Flagstaff Avenue, future 208th Street Extension) and utility construction work. Prior to commencement of the road and utility work, wetlands will be delineated and required permits will be obtained. As indicated in the item 8 Permits and Approvals Table, a permit application will be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The delineation report will be submitted with the application. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency MPCA Comments: The MPCA has not reviewed the EA W for this project. Therefore, the MPCA has no specific comments to provide the RGU. This decision by the MPCA not to review the EA W does not constitute waiver by the MPCA of any pending permits required by the MPCA. Response: The MPCA will have another opportunity to review the project through the permitting process, which would include a NPDES permit, a sewer extension permit, and permits for above or below ground tanks. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Permits and Approvals Required (Item No.8) DNR Comment I: Construction dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or one million gallons per year will require a DNR water appropriation permit. Response: Comment noted. The permit was listed in the table in EA W Item 8 as being necessary during underground utility dewatering. Cover Types (Item No. 11) DNR Comment 2: We encourage the school district to consider a green roof as part of the building design. Response: The incorporation of a green roof is cost prohibitive for the School District at this time. The District is incorporating other low impact development strategies such as rain gardens and infiltration techniques. In addition, the District reduced the impervious area (roof-top) by adding additional floors to the structure to reduce the overall footprint of the building. Water Use (Item No. 13) DNR Comment 3: The last sentence of the paragraph is incorrect. Please correct it to read, H[T]he need for a water appropriation permit from the DNR is based on a daily or annual volume to be dewatered... .. Response: Correction noted. The City will inform the School District of the daily threshold. Metropolitan Council Item 25 - Nearby Resources - Designated Parks, Recreation Areas, Trails Met Council Comment I: The Dakota East/West Regional Trail (Vermillion River) Search Corridor goes through the proposed development area... The Dakota East/West Regional Trail does not have an approved master plan. Dakota County will conduct a master planning process in the future to determine the trail alignment. The City and School District will need to coordinate with Steve Sullivan, Dakota County Parks Director, in regards to the proposed trail location. Response: Comment noted. As the trail alignment has not been determined yet, nor has the master planning process been initiated by the County, it is difficult to plan development around the future trail. Further, the City distributed a copy of the EA W to the County but did not receive any comments regarding the future trail from them. The City looks forward to working with the County Parks Department regarding placement of the trail and coordination with other development as the County gets further into the planning process and determines some potential locations for the trail. Aviation Met Council Comment 2: The proposed school site is within airspace that needs to be protected from potential obstructions. The EA W does not indicate what light standards, if any will be located at the athletic fields.... The City needs to notify the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) about the proposed athletic field lighting by submitting Form 7460 to the FAA. Response: Comment noted. The City will work with the School District to submit the required form to the FAA for approval ofthe School District's proposed athletic field lighting plan once the plan has been submitted to the City. Dakota Soil & Water Conservation District SWCD Comment I: The EA W identifies impacts and mitigations for the school project only and does not include environmental review for the Flagstaff Avenue reconstruction, sanitary and water main extensions and the new 208'h Street alignment projects. The public infrastructure projects appear to be connected actions that will likely require mandatory EA W reviews. Additional EA W review is also likely for the future development growth resulting from the availability of urban services and public access roads. Rather than to review each project individually, we suggest the school EA W be made part of a future Alternative Urban Areawide Review (A UAR) to jointly review the multiple projects at the same time. An AUAR [could) be used to coordinate with the city comprehensive plan and would [be) a more effective means to match the cumulative impacts of the projects to mitigation measures based on the needs of the entire development area. Response: The environmental review process is the responsibility of the City as the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for this type of project. In the interest of time, the City decided the EA W process was the most appropriate for the School District project. Other development in the area is not expected to occur for many years and it was not feasible for the District to wait for other proposals or to go through the more lengthy AUAR process. The City believes the connected actions referred to by the commenter have been adequately addressed in the EA W. Other than the sanitary sewer extension, the road and utility improvements proposed for construction in conjunction with the school project do not exceed a threshold on their own for a mandatory EA W. As indicated in the EA W, the City is in the process of working with the MPCA on the EA W for the trunk sewer line along Flagstaff Avenue. It appears the future 208th Street Extension will require an EA Was well, but the alignment has not been determined yet. Design and construction of this roadway are not anticipated for several years. SWCD Comment 2: In addition to NPDES requirements for special waters, the EA W indicates the permanent stormwater system shall also comply with the City of Farmington Storm water Management Plan (SWMP). The EA W should include information to identify what the SWMP standards are in order for the reviewer to conclude if the mitigation measures described in the EA W are consistent with that plan. Response: In the interest of brevity, the SWMP was not summarized in the EA W. However, the general discussion presented in the EA W is consistent with the SWMP. It is our understanding that a copy ofthe SWMP is on file at the SWCD for SWCD reference. If that copy has been misplaced, additional copies are available from the City. As stated in the EA W, the project will comply with the SWMP. If it does not, it will not be approved by the City and will not be constructed. SWCD Comment 3: To provide for effective and consistent level of protection for the Vermillion River and its South Creek and Middle Creek tributaries, we strongly recommend the storm water management system be designed to meet or exceed the performance standards currently used by the City of Lakeville South Creek Management Plan as well as the technical standards being developed by the Vermillion River Watershed JPO. These standards include rate, runoffvolume and thermal impact controls developed specifically for development activity within the Vermillion watershed area. Response: The EA W was prepared under the existing permit rules and City's requirements. The water resources management plan presented in the EA W does address runoff rate, volume and thermal controls. The rules eventually developed and adopted by the Vermillion River Watershed JPO may be more restrictive than the current rules and requirements. If this occurs, the City will work with the School District on responding to the future rules within regulatory requirements. The water resources management plan presented in the EA W will protect and in many ways enhance the area's water resources. Recognizing that part of the site drains to a warm water stream (Middle Creek) as well as a trout stream (South Creek) and developing a management plan accordingly, helps to protect the Watershed in a cost effective, environmentally defensible, manner. SWCD Comment 4: We appreciate the effort to include rain gardens, infiltration, filter strips and other Best Management Practices (BMPs) as components of the permanent stormwater system. We suggest that several other practices identified in the Farmington SWMP are also appropriate and should be included in this project. Response: Comment noted. As the project design moves forward, the City will work with the School District to determine if additional practices should be incorporated. SWCD Comment 5: The EA W describes a wet pond to intercept surface drainage from the Donnelly property andfeedlot operation. Pond water quality issues resultingfrom the high nutrient andfecal matter contained in the runoff may be significant. Other BMPs such as manure waste management, filter vegetation and buffers should be considered in place of a wet pond. Response: It is acknowledged that high concentrations of fecal bacteria and nutrients are likely in the existing runoff. And volumes of such matter leaving a future pond will likely be high despite significant reductions associated with sedimentation and bacterial uptake within the pool volume of a wet pond. However, in this situation, providing a wet pool volume to capture pollutants and prevent/minimize the re-suspension of sediments and flushing matter downstream is felt to be a superior best management practice to a dry ponding basin. A ponding basin is desired at this location to provide rate control to minimize downstream infrastructure needs in addition to water quality improvements. The alternative suggestions are sound and desirable; however, they affect another property owner outside the scope of this EA W and not associated with the project. Dakota County Transportation Department County DOT Comment I: The report does not state that Yz mile of Flagstaff is CR 64. This should be included and that County involvement is needed. Response: Flagstaff Avenue from 195th Street to 200th Street is County Road 64. The County will be included in any discussions regarding this section of roadway. CoungJ>OT Comment 2: There is no traffic/intersection analysis donefor the intersection ofCR 64 (20 Street) and Flagstaff (south junction). This segment of CR 64 between Flagstaff and Cedar has a 2005 ADT of 730 vehicles and is in the study limits. This roadway is gravel, but should be analyzed for impacts. Response: This intersection was not included in the original project scope as defmed by the City and therefore no analysis has been completed to date. Field observations indicate existing peak hour volumes are very low and no operational issues exist. The proposed school will increase the northbound through, northbound left turn, southbound through, and eastbound right turn volumes. The most difficult movement at this intersection would be the left turn from the west onto northbound Flagstaff Avenue. However, all motorists making this movement remain on County Road 64 as it curves through the intersection. Therefore, the increase in volume will not impact this movement. The City agrees with the traffic consultant recommendation that the layout and geometries of this intersection be reviewed as plans for improvements to Flagstaff Avenue are developed to determine if changes are needed. County DOT Comment 3: On page 7 of the TIS, it is stated that the 2008 nb traffic projections were from a 5% historical growth rate of local roadways. It should be explained how that was determined. Also it needs to be explained if they analyzed the Farmington development impacts in that area. If the development has not been considered, it should be. Farmington is developing commercial/industrial to the east of there and there will be traffic impacts on CSAH 50 by 2008. Response: The five percent growth rate was determined through the review of daily traffic volumes on the surrounding roadways over the past several years. The roadways reviewed included County Road 50, Flagstaff Avenue, and Cedar Avenue. The annual growth rate of five percent per year accounts for development outside the study area for which specific information is not available. Further, the growth rate of five percent per year is considered to be a conservative estimate and adequately accounts for development in the surrounding areas. County DOT Comment 4: The analysis is not included in the appendixfor the north and the south school accesses with the Flagstaff having a southbound right turn lane and a northbound left turn lane. The level of service is mentioned in the report but the analysis is not included. Response: The referenced worksheets are attached. County DOT Comment 5: There is an elementary school with their entrance onto 195/h. The TIS does not mention if they took that into consideration or not. Are the school startlend times the same or close? If so, should analyze/discuss the impacts at the intersections at 195/h and Flagstaff and at 195 & Pilot Knob with all the school traffic on 195th at the same time. If they are not and it's not an impact, that should be discussed also. Response: The elementary school hours are 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and the high school hours are 7:35 a.m. to 2:20 p.m. The hours for each school are quite different and therefore the traffic impacts will not overlap. Dakota County Office of Planning Transportation Comments County Comment 1: The EAW does not state that Yz mile of Flagstaffis CR 64. This change should be made and a note included that the County will need to be involved on any discussions regarding CR 64 and permits will be required from the County on that segment of Flagstaff. Response: Flagstaff Avenue from 195th Street to 200lh Street is County Road 64. The County will be included in any discussions regarding this section of roadway and required permits will be obtained. County Comment 2: There is no traffic/intersection analysis done for the intersection ofCR 64 (20r/' Street) and Flagstaff (south junction). This segment of CR 64 between Flagstaff and Cedar has a 2005 ADT of 730 vehicles and is in the study limits. Currently, this roadway is gravel; however because of the school development it should be analyzed for impacts. Response: This intersection was not included in the original project scope as defined by the City and therefore no analysis has been completed to date. Field observations indicate existing peak hour volumes are very low and no operational issues exist. The proposed school will increase the northbound through, northbound left turn, southbound through, and eastbound right turn volumes. The most difficult movement at this intersection would be the left turn from the west onto northbound Flagstaff Avenue. However, all motorists making this movement remain on County Road 64 as it curves through the intersection. Therefore, the increase in volume will not impact this movement. The City agrees with the traffic consultant recommendation that the layout and geometries of this intersection be reviewed as plans for improvements to Flagstaff A venue are developed to determine if changes are needed. County Comment 3: Page 7 of the traffic study attached to the EAW states that the 2008 northbound traffic projections were from a 5% historical growth rate of local roadways. It should be explained how that was determined. Also the EA W needs to report the level of analysis of other Farmington development impacts in that area. If the development has not been evaluated, it should be. Farmington is developing commercial/industrial to the east and there will be traffic impacts on CSAH 50 by 2008. Response: The five percent growth rate was determined through the review of daily traffic volumes on the surrounding roadways over the past several years. The roadways reviewed included County Road 50, Flagstaff Avenue, and Cedar Avenue. The annual growth rate of five percent per year accounts for development outside the study area for which specific information is not available. Further, the growth rate of five percent per year is considered to be a conservative estimate and adequately accounts for development in the surrounding areas. County Comment 4: The analysis is not included in the appendix for the north and the south school accesses with the Flagstaff having a southbound right turn lane and a northbound left turn lane. The level of service is mentioned in the report but the analysis is not included. Response: The referenced worksheets are attached. County Comment 5: There is also an elementary school with their entrance onto 195th. The report does not mention if that was taken into consideration. Do the schools have the same start/end times, or are they very close? Ifso, you should analyze/discuss the impacts at the intersections at 195th and Flagstaff and at 195 & Pilot Knob with all the school traffic on 195th at the same time. If they are not and it's not an impact, that should be reported also. Response: The elementary school hours are 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and the high school hours are 7:35 a.m. to 2:20 p.m. The hours for each school are quite different and therefore the traffic impacts will not overlap. County Comment 6: There are no turn lanes on County Road 64 at Cedar Avenue. CR 64 was previously reconstructed as a paved rural road with left turn lanes and shoulders for one mile from Flagstaff Avenue to CSAH 31 (Pilot Knob Road). County Road 64 should be evaluated at this location to determine if turn lanes are needed. Response: We expect minimal use of County Road 64 west of Flagstaff Avenue by School trips. We estimate the school will add 110 vehicles per day to CR 64 between Cedar Avenue and Flagstaff Avenue. This is broken down into 55 westbound right turns and 55 southbound left turns at the Cedar Avenue/CR 64 intersection. The 2005 AADT on CR 64 east of Cedar Avenue is 810 vehicles per day. Thus, it is our opinion that turn lanes are not needed at the County Road 64/Cedar Avenue intersection with the School. County Comment 7: The County is planning a new east/west arterial that will connect to the west Lakeville Border all the way to Biscayne in Empire Township. This new route will use the existing County Road 64 alignment east of Flagstaff Avenue (J 95th Street). When this new arterial is completed, County Road 64 (J 95th Street) will carry significantly more traffic and provide for more cross County traffic than the current road system. Response: We agree with these statements. If and when the plans for that new arterial are finalized, the intersection of 195th Street and Flagstaff Avenue should be reanalyzed. County Comment 8: The west end of the pedestrian trail system on the south side of CR 64 ends at the elementary school one quarter mile east of Flagstaff Avenue and connects with the trail system along CSAH 31. There is a pedestrian trail system along CSAH 50 on the north side. Consideration should be given to connect the pedestrian trails with the Flagstaff Avenue reconstruction. Response: The City has a Trails Master Plan that proposes trails on both sides of Flagstaff Avenue and which would connect to the regional trail on the north side of CSAH 50. Environmental Review County Comment 9 Summary: The County asks that the City refer to a letter submitted June 20 expressing environmental concerns over the proposed land use change. Comments in the June 2(jh letter relate to the presence of wetlands, wells and sites of potential contamination within one mile of the project site. The comments indicate that no waste sites were identified at the project site, but that there is potential for encountering old farmsteads when rural areas are developed. The comments also indicate that the Vermilion River is classified as a protected trout stream in the project site area. Response: The City appreciates the information provided by the County. There are no structures, wells, septic systems, or other features associated with old farmsteads at the project site and contamination is not known to be present. If contamination is discovered during construction, proper procedure will be followed with regard to notification and cleanup. The City is aware of the presence of water resources (wetlands, the Vermillion River and its tributaries) in the project area. As stated in the EA W, the development will be required to comply with the City's SWMP and other rules/standards associated with stormwater management and protection of water resources from the impacts (both direct and indirect) of development. Sustain ability County Comment 10 Summary: The County suggested several design characteristics that would promote energy and water conservation, healthy indoor air quality, and maximization of natural light. They also made suggestions regarding stormwater management and landscaping. Please see attached letter for the complete list of comments. Response: School District plans for the building and grounds have integrated the following into the school design: . Use of glass has been maximized to the extent possible within the School District budget. At least a 4X6 window is included in every teaching space. Large amounts of north facing glass illuminate the cafeteria and Media Center. The design allows the academic wings to provide shade of much of the east, west and south facing windows. Utilizing exterior shading devices for the "hands on learning labs" will reduce heat gain and glare. . Utilization of the Lutron Lighting management system will allow for independent control of each fixture included on the system to reduce light levels where natural light is providing all or a portion of the necessary lighting needs for a particular area. . There are three different mechanical systems, Displacement Ventilation and standard Variable Air Volume (V A V), which capitalize on the strengths of each system given the variety of spaces and their methods of utilization. . All pumps and motors are equipped with Variable Frequency Drives (VFD). . The system utilizes Ice Storage, allowing the system to operate efficiently off-peak. . Fume hoods are on integrated controls to reduce the amount of exhaust air. . Where appropriate, heat recovery components are utilized on air handling units. . There is a complete building management system that includes C02 sensors to aid in the control of mechanical systems and motion detectors to aid in lighting control. . The building will be commissioned to assure all systems are operating in the manner intended and designed. . Pervious parking surfaces were considered, but they are not reliable with the climate of Minnesota. There are companies which are experimenting with these systems but none have expressed a willingness to ensure a wearable surface equal to less costly systems. . Landscape islands have been incorporated in parking areas to reduce heat island absorption; the landscape islands have been coordinated with lighting needs to reduce light fIxture counts. . The site includes rain gardens and swales coordinated with other site amenities. . The use of prairie grasses and other seed mixes has been maximized in order to reduce the flow of water/storm water run-off impacts and reduce maintenance costs (mowing, watering, fertilizing) . . The prairie grass seeded areas will also contain seedlings of native trees and shrubs to help reduce heat absorption . The tallest light fIxtures are 90' tall. //~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator r FROM: Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Update on Proposed Orderly Annexation Agreement with Castle Rock Township DATE: August 21, 2006 INTRODUCTION Castle Rock Township is seeking the City Council's reaction to a newly-revised version of an Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and the Township. DISCUSSION The City Council approved a draft of a proposed Orderly Annexation Agreement [OAA] between the City and the Township on June 5, 2006. At a Castle Rock Town Board meeting that was held on July 24,2006, a motion to approve the same draft failed on a 2-3 vote. On the same date, the Town Board approved a revised draft of the OAA on a 4-1 vote. At the last City Council meeting on August 7, the Council declined to approve or accept the revisions that had been proposed by the Township. At the subsequent Town Board meeting on August 8, a majority of the Board indicated a willingness to delete or withdraw two of the previously proposed revisions that seemed the most objectionable to the City Council. Language has also been added to clarify the fact that the "property tax rebates" to Castle Rock Township (see Paragraph 19) apply to new residential projects only. Attached hereto is a copy of the proposed OAA that includes handwritten notations regarding the two changes in question, which were discussed at a meeting of the Farmington/Castle Rock Discussion Group on August 15. At that time, all ofthe members of the Group indicated that this revised version of the OAA was acceptable to them, and that they were prepared to recommend to their respective jurisdictions that the revised OAA be approved or adopted. The Group agreed upon the following sequence of events: August 21, 2005 (5:30 p.m.): Town Board meets to reaffirm that there is a consensus in favor of the latest version of the OAA. August 21, 2005 (7:00 p.m.): City Council determines whether Council has a consensus in favor of latest version of the OAA. September 5, 2005: City Council formally approves OAA if each jurisdiction indicated on August 21 that it had a consensus in favor of the document. September 13, 2005: Town Board formally approves OAA to complete the process. ACTION REQUESTED City Council members are respectfully asked to indicate whether they would be prepared to formally approve the latest version of the OAA at the Council's next regular meeting on September 5, 2006. ~e eoW ~SU~ ~LU vin Carroll Community Development Director cc: Castle Rock Township Bryce Olson Terry and Linda Mock 11 ~ s;.~cllL-4-/'LE5-r /LIEVI5/&-/V,S CJ {II P 4f> c..s 5 /f-tvD 7 . II JOINT RESOLUTION/ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT II BElWEEN CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP AND THE CITY OF FARMINGTON II THIS ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT is enterel1 into this _____ of _______________,2006 by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP (hereinafter \1 referred to as the "Township"). II JI WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues 414.0325 authorizes' townships and municipalities to provide for the orderly annexation of unincorporated are~s that are in need of orderly annexation; and II II II WHEREAS, the City and Township agree that therells a public need for the coordinated, efficient and cost--effective extension of thc city-sewer and water services to promote the public health, 'vVell being, and 3afet:yeconomic lITowth and develoDment. and Drovide for the efficient deliverv of desired or reauired Dublic services; and II . WHEREAS, the property described in attached Exhibit "A" (hereinafter referred to II as the "Annexation Area") is about to become urban or suburban in nature and the City is capable of providing cit:ysewer. water. and other DubHc services within a reasonable time; md ~ II II WHEREAS, the extension of eitysewer. water. and other Dublic services can only be provided in prioritized phases if the process and timing of a~nexationservice reauirements are clearly identified and jointly agreed upon in advance of the City's capital planning, commitment, and expenditure; and II II II II WHEREAS, the establishment of a process of orderly annexation of said lands will~ be of benefit to the residents and owners of said lantis, and permit the City to extend ncce3sary municipal services in a planned and efficient manner; and WHEREAS, the City and Township desire to accomplish the orderly annexation of the Annexation Area and the extension of municipal services in a mutually acceptable and II beneficial manner without the need for a hearing before the Municipal Boundary Adjustments Unit [MBAU] of the Office of Administrative f.learings, or its successor, and with the purpose of avoiding annexation disputes, enter intql this joint resolution for orderly annexation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.0325, subd. 1;-ftftd II . 'JlHEREAS, a means is needed to control the dc-v.clolpment of these areas, II NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Farmington and Castle II Rock Township that the two parties enter into this Joint Resolution Orderly Annexation II II . . . II Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") and agree to the following terms: II II Acreal!e and Location II 1. The attached map entitled "Exhibit A ' Annexation ~tea" shall be the framework for annexation from 2006 through 2016 (inclusive). The map constitutes the Annexation Area, II and denotes areas from which annexation may occur under this agreement. It is not necessary that all of the land constituting the Annexation Area be annexed within the time period set forth in this agreement. 2. The lands included within the 2006 through 2016 Annexation Area are designated for future urban development within the City. The Township shall oppose any efforts to include any of the lands within the Annexation Area into any governmental jurisdiction other than the City. II Annexation Area II 3. The City shall have the right to annex land within the Annexation Area during the period from the date of this Agreement though December 31', 2016. The annexation pace shall be consistent with the requirements and standards set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, and zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. 4. Annexation will be limited to property that is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City. II 5. All annexations shall be subject to the prevailing Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning II Ordinance, and subdivision regulations of the City. II 6. The Township will not file any objection with the MBAU concerning the City's annexation of any land within the Annexation Area describe~ above, so long as the annexation complies with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Comorehensive Plan and Zoninl! and Subdivision Retrlllations: 7. The City will revise thc prcsent.i.t;s Comprehensive Plan, and zoning and subdi-"ision regulations, to address areas to be anncxedmoDerties located within the Annexation Area. II 8. (a) Except as provided in Paragraph 8 (b) or 8 (c), the Planning Commission and/or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not.adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation or an initial zoning classific'ationfor anv mODertv located 2 II II II . within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way 4ethat initial Comprehensive Plan designation or zoning classification within thc Anncxation Area, without providing the Township with reasonable advance notice of (and a reasonable opportunity to comment on) any such adoption, modification, change or alteration. (b) With regard to any proposed industrial t:tSelOr any proposed commercial use of property that is not adjacent to State Highway 311 the Planning Commission and/or the II City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation or an initial zoning classificationfor any orooert:v'~located within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way 4ethat initial Comprehensive Plan designation or zoning classification within the Annexation l.rea, without the consent of the Township Board, which consent may not be unreason:~bly withheld. . II (c) With regard to any proposed medium to high Clensity residential. industrial. or commercial use that is proposed to be constructed within ::150' of the west property line of any Castle Rock Township residence that is located adjacent to Berring Avenue, the Planning Commission and/or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation or an initial zoning classificationfor any orooertv located within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify" change, or alter in any way 4ethat initial Comprehensive Plan designation or zoning classification within the Annexation Area, without the consent of the Township Board, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld", II (d) With re!!ard to any future develooment orooosed to be constructed alon!! the II west orooertv line of any Castle Rock T ownshio residence that is located adiacent to ,. Berrin!! Avenue. the City will not obtain or reauire any oermanent easements or ri!!hts-of. way from the owners of the Berrin!! Avenue orooerties in au~stion. Plannine and Land Use Control .' II II 2... ~Pursuant to MN Statute 414.0325, MN Statute 471.59, and Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes, the parties agree that the City shall have the authority to exercise planning, land use, zoning and subdivision authority within the Annexation Area. 10. If Dak'Ota County objects to the City's zoning control over the Annexation Area, which is located outside of the incorporated area of ., the City, then the T O-;li1ship and the City shall each designate one person to serve on the three person governing committee described in MN Statutc 111.0325, subd. 5. The City shall dcsignatc thc z9ning administrator f'Or thc Annexation Area.Prior to the actual annexation ~f a Darcel of orooertv located within the Annexation Area. the Citv's exercise of such authority shall be limited to adootin!! a Comorehensive Plan desi!!nation for that Darcel. which will not 3 " II . II II . . . II II 10. affect the oarcels land use unless and until the annexation is comolete. Unless otherwise aQ'feed to in writim! by the City and the T ownshio. the zonin!! and usds) of a oarcellocated within the Annexation Area. and the construction or modification of structures located thereon. shall be controlled by the T ownshio' s Comorehensive Plan. Zonim! Code. rerulations and orocedures until the annexation of that oarcel has been comoleted. 0, Intentionally omitted and reserved for future use. ;; ,I Annexation Process II 11. Annexations within the Annexation Area shall occur 'Only if the owners of the properties located within the Annexation Area petition for annexation. II II II 12. If the City intends to annex a parcel of property within the Annexation Area, the II City shall, within 14 days of receipt of a petition to annex property within the Annexation II Area, submit to the Township the following: (A) The legal description and a map of the property proposed to be annexed; II (B) A description of the proposed use of said property, if known by the City, and with the express understanding that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any such proposed use; II Upon receipt of submittals set forth above, the Township will be provided 30 days to II comment on the proposed annexation. ;~ II 13. During the term of this Agreement, petitions for the annexation of areas located outside of the Annexation Area shall not be accepted, processed or approved by the City ,I without the express written consent of the Castle Rock Boar~ of Supervisors. This provision shall remain in effect through December 31, 20161:even if this Agreement terminates earlier than December 31, 2016 pursuant to Paragraph 27 hereof. Road Maintenance and Improvement; Transportation'LPlanninl!; Road and Bridl!e Account II II II 14. Road Maintenance Prior to Annexation. The Township shall continue its normal maintenance of existing Township roads, bridges, drainage f~cilities, and street signage for any property located within the Annexation Area until that property is annexed by the City. II II II 4 II Il II . . . II II II II 15. Toint Maintenance/Improvement Expenses. The City and Township agree to develop a joint policy for sharing the cost of maintaining and improving Township roads that are adjacent to any property that is annexed pursuant to, the terms of this Agreement. II 16. Joint Transportation Planning. The City and the Township will work in cooperation with Dakota County, MnDOT and developers to assure that any new development within the Annexation Area properly addresses:' \1 u II (A) the transportation needs of the project; II (B) II projected impacts on City and/ or Township roads, especially those that are Ii likely to result in the need to make improvements or upgrades due to increased traffic and/or different types of usag~s; and II (C) Comprehensive Plan. 17. Road and Bridge Account. The Towns a create a new road and bridge account that is separate from its exis' road and bridge account. Payments of the type referred to in Paragr 1 w shall be deposited into thJI new account. The Township may transfer up to. 0 f each such deposit into its general revenue fund, to be used " . .t. Funds in the new road and bridge account shall be used exclusively for the following purposes: (a) (b) ., II Maintenance;~ The funds in question may be applied to increases in roadway maintenance costs that are reasonably attributabld: to development that occurs within any portion of the ,Annexation .^..rea that iJ annexed by the Citynn Roadwav SeQments A. B. Cor D. as identified on'the attached Exhibit B. and on BerrinQ Avenue and 230th Street. II Improvements: The funds in question may be applied to the cost(s) of .1 constructing, reconstructing, paving or otherwise f.mproving Roadway Segments A, B, CorD, as identified on the attached Exhibit B. and 230th Street. Affy required impnYv'ements to Segment A must be completed before funds can be applied to the imprO'.."ement of Segments B, C or D. Segment B must be completed before funds can be applied to the impro'v'ement of Segment C. " " The City's ad'v'ancc written consent shall be required for anyTownshio's enQineer shall discuss anv orooosed or anticipated expenditure in excess ofl$1000. Any uncxpcndcd1QQQ 5 i~ II . . . II II Ii with the Citv's Public Works Director orior to the authorization or commencement of the II work in auestion. Anv funds that remain in the account upon the expiration of this II Agreement shall be returned to the City unless the parties have mutually agreed in writing, I' prior to said expiration, that dte~ funds may be retained~py the Township so that they maybe applied to road and bridgcfor other costs attributable 'to any additional development that occurs within an area subject to any separate Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and the Township. II StatutOry Sharinl! of Tax Revenues n II 18. Property tax revenue generated by annexed properties.shall be allocated between the City and the Township on the following basis: II II A) Ash Street Orderly Annexation Area: For any past o~ future annexations involving properties located within the Ash Street Orderly Annexation Area, property tax jl revenues related to commercial or industrial properties (only) will be shared by the " City and the Township pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. Sec 414.035, II subd. 12, as set forth below: Subd. 12. Property taxes. When a municipality ~I annexes land under subdivision 2, clause (2), (3), or (4), property taxes payable on the annexed land shall continue to be paid to the affected town or towns for the year in"which the annexation becomes effective. If the annexation becomes effective on or before August 1 of a levy year, the municipality may levy on the annexed area beginning with that same levy year. If the annexation becomes effective after August 1 of a levy year, the town may continue to levy on the anrtexed area for that levy year, and the municipality may not levy gn the annexed area until the following levy year. In the first ~ear following the year when the municipality could first levy onllthe annexed area under this subdivision, and thereafter, property taxes on the annexed land shall be paid to the municipalityl! In the first year following the year the municipality could first levy on the annexed area, the municipality shall make allcash payment to the affected town or towns in an amount equal to 90 percent of the property taxes distributed to the town in r~gard to the annexed area in the last year the property taxes from the annexed area were payable to the town; in the seco~d year, an amount equal to 70 percent; in the third year, an amount equal to 50 percent; in the fourth year, an amount equalllto 30 percent; and in the fifth year, an amount equal to"ten percent. The municipality and the affected township may agree to a different payment. /1 Any past payments due to the Township pursuant to this Paragraph 18(A) shall be calculated and paid as if this provision had been in effect as of the date of annexation. 6 If II II Il " . B) Future Annexations: For any future annexations that are completed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, property tax revenll;~s related to properties located within the 2006-2016 Annexation Area shall be shared pursuant to Paragraph 19 of this /,( rr/;t I~ /(/ ~~ p~ ~,i)V II Tax Rebates to Castle Rock Township II 19. Payments to Township. Upon annexation of any land per this Agreeme t, the Township shall not be entitled to receive tax revenue rebates from the City un such time as the property is developed or redeveloped. When developrRent or redevelop and the improved property is assessed in a manner that reflec,ts the value of t development improvements, the Township shall begin to receive tax revenue ebates. The tax rebate received by the Township on any given developed or redevelope residential parcel shall be equal to 50% of the amount of the City's share of the total pr perty taxes II paid on that parcel in the first tax year that reflects the full value of the completed initial improvements. Improvements shall be considered "complete~" when the City issues a Certificate of Occupancy. 20. The Township will provide an annual accounting of the use of funds from the oad and Bridge Account referred to herein. If the City wishes to challenge the accounting, 't may do so at its own expense. If there is an error in the T oJhship' s accounting,.-4eft ) " . The payments due to the Township pursuant to this Agreement will be made within 60 days of the City's receipt of the property tax revenue(s) in qu~stion, or within 60 days of receipt by the City of the annual accounting from the Township, whichever is later. the expense the City incurred to audit the Township' s accou~~ting will be paid through reduction of funds owed to the Township pursuant to this Agreement. Dispute Resolution and Amendment II 11 21. Disputes concerning this agreement shall be resolved as follows: .' . " (A) NEGOTIATION. When a disagreement over interpretation of any provision of this agreement occurs, the City and Township must meet at least once, at a mutually convenient time and place, to attempt to resolve the dispute through negotiation. Ii I~ II II .. ~I 7 I~ Il " II ---.1L. II " II " . (B) MEDIATION. If the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, claim or counterclaim, or are unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable interpretation of any provision of this agreement, the parties may mutually agree in writing to seek relief by submitting their respective grievances to non-binding mediation. II " (C) ADJUDICATION. When the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, claim or counterclaim, or are unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable interpretation of any provisions of this agreement, or are unable to agree to submit their respective grievances to non-binding mediation, then either parJ. may seek relief through initiation of an action in a court of competent jurisdic'tion. In addition to the remedies provided for in this agreement and any othe~ available remedies at law or equity, in the case of a violation, default or breach of any provision of this agreement, the non-violating, non-defaulting, non-breaching party may bring an action for specific performance to compel the performance of this agreement in accordance with its terms. If a court action is required, the court may reimburse the prevailing party for its reasonable attorney's fees and costs. .. General Terms and Provisions " . 22. This agreement may not be modified, amended or altered except upon the written II joint resolution of the City and Township, duly executed and adopted by the City Council and Township Board of Supervisors, and filed with the MBAU. Either party to this agreement may request an amendment. Requests for amendments will first be considered by the Farmingtoneach jurisdiction's Planning Commission. Its recommendation Their recommendations shall be forwarded to the Township Board and the City Council. jl The City and Township agree to meet jointly on an annual basis to consider and discuss (a) the usage of Road and Bridge Account funds during the preceding twelve months and (b) possible modifications to this orderly Annexation Agreement. II 23. The terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of t~is agreement, including the present and all future attachments, shall constitute the entir~ agreement between the parties, superseding all prior agreements and negotiations regarding the Annexation Area (with the exception of any jointly approved roadway maintenance agreements between the City and the Township). There are no understandings, agreJlnents or assumptions other than the written terms of this agreement. .. . 24. This agreement shall be binding upon and benefit th~ respective successors and assigns of the City and Township. Specifically, this agreement is binding upon the 8 II II II . governmental entity that survives or is created by any action on the part of the Township to merge, consolidate, detach, annex, reorganize or incorporate.;: II 25. This agreement is made pursuant to, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event any provision of this agreement is determined or adjudged to be unconstitutional, invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this agreement shall remain in full II force and effect. 26. Upon the filing of this Agreement and resolution with the MBAU, the parties will not request any alteration of the boundaries of the land constituting the Annexation Area, or any change in the annexation of land not provided for in this agreement. The MBAU may review and comment on the annexation resolution, but I;Ilay not otherwise consider the resolution or alter the Annexation Area boundaries. Withinj~thirty (30) days of receipt of an annexation resolution adopted by the City, which complies with this Agreement, the MBAU must order the annexation of the area described in the annexation resolution in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. Termination of Orderly Annexation A2reement . 27. This agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2016, or the date upon which all permitted annexation of land in the Annexation Area has been completed, whichever occurs sooner. II Notwithstanding the termination of this agreement, the following provisions shall remain binding and enforceable after the termination of the agreement for all properties annexed under the terms of this agreement: (A) Paragraph 17 - Relating to dcdicatcd use of tax rebate funds. Any funds in II the Road and Bridge Account (Paragraph 17 H~reof) shall remain available to the Township for the purposes referred to in ~aragraph 17 until the later of: " 1. December 31,2016, or II 2. Two (s) years after the City Council's approval of the last annexation of property located within the Annexation Area that occurs prior to December 31,2016. " (B) Paragraph 19 - Relating to tax rebates; and II . (C) Paragraph 20 - Relating to annual accounting. 9 " II . . . II II II " Bindine Aereement. Director's Review II 28. No alteration of the areas set forth herein for orderly annexation, or their boundaries is appropriate. The director may review and comment, but not alter the boundaries. II 29. This Orderly Annexation Agreement designates certain areas as in need of eligible for orderly annexation, and provides the conditions for the annexation of those areas. The parties agree that no consideration by the director is necessary, and that therefore the director may review, and comment, but shall, within thirty (3b) days of the submission of a petition for annexation in conformity with this Agreement, order annexation consistent with the terms of this Orderly Annexation Agreement, and Resolutions submitted pursuant thereto. 30. This Agreement is a binding contract, and provides tl}.e exclusive procedures by which the unincorporated property identified in the Agreement may be annexed to the City. The City shall not annex property within the Annexation Area by any other pro~~re. II ADOPTED BY THE CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON I. THE DAY OF , 2006. " ATTESTED TO: II By: Its: By: Its: Town Clerk II Board Chair ADOPTED BY THE FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL ON THE , 2006. I! II DAY OF II ATTESTED TO: II II By: By: _______________, 11ayor ________________ City Administrator II II " 10 II " II )c( a.- City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator~ FROM: Robin Roland Finance Director SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance - Text Amendment Modifying the partial payment and deferment of Special Assessments DATE: August 21,2006 INTRODUCTION A revision of the current code, in order to update and clarify partial payments and deferral of special assessments, is needed. DISCUSSION The revision of the current code will clarify the application and renewal procedure and establish a clearer basis for determining hardship. The revision also adds a provision that will not allow deferment on a parcel that is in a delinquent status at Dakota County or the City until that delinquency is brought current. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached ordinance amending Section 1-14-1 of the City Code for Partial Payment of Special Assessments and Section 1-14-2 of the City Code for the Deferment of Special Assessments. d/2/!r , Robin Roland Finance Director II II II II II . CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 006- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1-14-1: PARTIAL PAYMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND SECTION 1-14-2: DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 1-14-1 ofthe Farmington City Code is amended as follows (added text is blue, deleted text is st:mek): I~ . The City hereby authorizes the partial prepayment of special assessments certified pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes chapter 429. The owner of any property upon which a special assessment has been levied may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment or the first installment thereof to the County Auditor, pay the whole assessment or may partially prepay any portion,lpot less than $100, of said assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer; provided, that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days of the adoption of the assessment (Ord. 088-211,12-19-88) SECTION 2. Section 1-14-2 of the Farmington City Code is amended as follows (added text is blue, deleted text is st:mek): II II The City Council may, in its discretion, approve the def.erral of the payment of any special assessment le'.'ied by it against homestead property in the City, o'lIned by a person sixty five (65) years of age or older or a person retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability for \vhom payment of the assessment would be a hardship. The City Council may defer the payment of any special assessment on homestead property owned by an individual who qualifies under one of;ithe hardship criteria set forth in Section C below. " (A) Application for Deferral of Assessments: Application for deferral of special assessments shall be made at any time after the adoption of the assessment roll 9R a form proscribed by the Dakota County Auditor or the City Council and shall include a sworn affidavit signed by the applicant stating current income and assets. /'.n applicant claiming retirement by virtue of a permanent ~nd total disability must include a sworn affidavit by a licensed medical doctor sthting that the applicant is unable to be gainfully employed because of a permanent and total disability. by filling out an application form available from the Finance Department at Farmington . City Hall. II II II . . . If the application for a deferral is approved, the City will'hotify the Dakota County Treasurer-Auditor and a notice of the deferral will be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder pursuant to Minnesota Statute 435.194 (8) Duration and Renewal: A deferral, if granted, shall be effective for a period of twa t21 one (1) years. An dof-orral may be rene'Ned for an additional hvo (2) years upon the filing of a nOli.' application prior to the end of the two (2) year period. The procedure for approval shall be the same as for the initial application. application form will be sent out each year to re-apply for the deferment. The application must .. be returned by September 30. Renewal applications will be approved by the City Administrator for those cases whereby the original conditions for qualification remain substantially unchanged. II (C) Hardship Defined: 1\ prima facie case of hardship shall be deemed to exist when all of the follmving have been shown: Determination: A hardship is deemed to exist if the applicant meets all of the following conditions: 1. The annual gross income of the applicant and spouse (if any) according to the Federal Income Tax Return, plus the tax exempt incomo, does not exceed the limitations set forth, from time to time, by resolution of t~e City Council. The requested deferral is for homestead property owned by'a person 65 years of age or older, or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability. " Permanent and lor total disability shall be determined by the applicant demonstrating to the City's satisfaction that he or she qualifies for "permanent and total disability" for Workers' Compensation, Social Security, or other federal or state program. An applicant must substantiate the retirement by reason of permanent and/or total disability by providing a sworn affidavit by a licensed medical doctor attesting that the applicant is unable to be gainfully employed because of a permanent and/or total disability. 2. The gross assets of the 3pplic3nt 3nd any other owner of the property who resides therein with the applicant does not exceed thirty' six thous3nd doll3rs ($36,000.00), excluding the homeste3d property. The average annual payment for all assessments levied against the subject property exceeds one (1) percent of the adjusted gross income of the individual as evidenced by the applicant's most recent federal income tax return. The average annual payment of an assessment shall be the total cost of the assessment divided by the number of years over which it is spread. If the applicant's income appears to make them ineligible for the deferment, but they believe a hardship would occur if the special assessment had to be paid, they can apply to the City Council for special consideration for a ~eferment. II 3. The total special assessment (principal + interest for Jerm of assessment) exceeds five hundred dollars ($500.00) one thousand d911ars ($1000.00). (D) The City Council may find hardship on the b3sis of Exceptional and Unusual circumstances not covered by the preceding st3nd3rds as long as such determination is made in 3 nondiscriminatory m3nner and does. :-Notwithstanding " . . . " the foregoing provisions of this section, the City Council, upon recommendation by the City Administrator, may pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 9435.193 determine a hardship based on exceptional and unusual circumstances not covered by the conditions in Section C. Any determination shall be made in a nondiscriminatory manner, and shall not give the applicant an unreasonable preference or advantage over other applicants. tQj-(E) Interest Rate: Unless otherwise provided under the resolution adopting the special assessment, all assessments deferred under this Section shall bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. ~ (F) Termination of Deferral: Deferral of special assessments under this Section shall II terminate upon the occurrence of anyone of the following events: II 1. The death of the property owner when there is no surviving spouse who is eligible for deferment. 2. The sale, transfer or subdivision of all or any part of the property. II 3. The loss of homestead status for the property. 4. The failure of the applicant to file a renewal application within the time prescribed in subsection B of this Section. 5. The property owners' no longer meeting the hardshiH:eligibility requirements of subsection C or D of this Section. Property owners who have been granted a deferral under this Section have a continuing obligation to notify the City Clerk of any changes in their eligibility for deferment. Upon termination of deferral, all deferred assessments plus applicable interest will become immediately due and payable and the City Clerk shall notify the Dakota County Auditor and the Dakota County Recorder of the termination of deferral. The City Council may, at its discretion, provide for payment of the sums in installment payments in accordance with the terms of the original assessment. (Ord. 093-316, 9~20-93) II (F) Certify taxes paid: The City of Farmington requires, as part of the necessary information on an application, and as a condition of a grant of approval that an applicant for an amendment to an official control established pursuant to Minnesota Statute section 462.351 to 462.364, or for a permit or other approval required under an official control established pursuant to those sections, to certify that there are no delinquent property taxes, special assessments, penalti'es, interest and/or municipal utility fees due on the parcel to which the application relates. In the case of taxes, assessments, penalties and interest the certification shall consist of a statement from the Dakota County Treasurer-Auditor. Property taxes which are being paid under the provisions of a stipulation, order or confession of judgment, or which are being appealed as provided by law, are not considered delinquent for purposes of this subdivision if all required payments due under the terms of the stipulation, order, confession of judgment, or appeal have been paid. . . . If there are delinquencies due as stated above on the parcel for which an approval is being sought, the City Council shall attach as a condition to the approval being sought, a condition that said approval shall not be effective until the delinquent amounts have been paid in full. Application and Authorization For Delayed Payment of Tax on Special Assessments II STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF DAKOTA TO: County Auditor, Dakota County, Minnesota Date 20 I, the undersigned, declare under penalties of perjury That I reside at That I am not less than 65 years of age or permanently and totally disabled or otherwise qualified for, deferral of assessment under the City of Farmington City Code That I am the owner of the property legally described as: I. Property Identification No.: That my interest in the ownership of the above property was acquired on And is as follows: 1. Sole ownership (Enter yes, if applicable) 2. Joint Tenancy, held with 3. Other undivided interest (Specify) Address ,19_, I~ That on January 2,20_, or June 1,20_, I owned and occupied the above property as my homestead and such occupancy began on ,20_. That the installments for improvements on the special assessments duly adopted in ordinance by the City Council of Farmington as of ,20_, which have been allocated against the subject property would create an undue personal hardship on my behalf and I respectfully request that payment be delayed and that such installments be so deferred for the years 20_ to 20_. II Signature of owner FOR CITY USE ONLY I, ,Clerk of the City of Farmington in Dakota County, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the application of , above named, has been duly reviewed and that in accordance with the minutes of official record in the chambers was duly _APPROVED or _DENIED as of ,20_. That in accordance with approval granted, the special assessments listed below on the affiants subject property levied for annual collection in the amounts and for the years shown be so deferred with interest at the annual rate shown until such time as it is deemed that applicant no longer qualifies or the property loses its eligibility. Years of collection "Interest (Inclusive) II Rate Name of Assessment Total Amt. SA# II ADOPTED this _ day of ,2006, by the City Council of the City of Farmington. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Kevan Soderberg, Mayor ATTEST: By: Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator SEAL Approved as to form the _ day of 2006. By: City Attorney Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,2006. Values Statement Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional and cost-effective manner. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Ethics and Integrity We believe that ethics and integrity are the foundation blocks of public trust and confidence and that all meaningful relationships are built on these values. Open and Honest Communication We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. Cooperation and Teamwork We believe that the public is best served when departments and employees work cooperatively as a team rather than at cross purposes. Visionary Leadership and Planning We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be visionary and to plan for the future. Positive Relations with the Community We believe that positive relations with the community and public we serve leads to positive, involved, and active citizens. Professionalism We believe that continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism and are committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and the development of our employees. R55CKSUM LOG..3000VO CITY OF FAR ON 8/17/ 1 :02:42 Council Check Summary Page - COUNCIL MEETING ON AUGUST 21, 2006 8(112006 - 8/20/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 3RD LAIR SKATEPARK RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,288,00 1,288.00 AFFINITY PLUS FEDERAL CREDIT U EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CREDIT UNION PAYABLE 2,685,00 2,685.00 AIRLAKE TRUCK SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 3,659,60 3,659,60 AL'S LOCK AND KEY SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 110,00 110.00 ALBRIGHT, JIM RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 66.00 66.00 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RETIRE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 70.00 70,00 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING I 195TH ST EXTENSION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,122.10 1,122.10 ANDERSENINC,EARLF STREET MAINTENANCE SIGNS & STRIPPING MATERIALS 99,45 NPDES Phase II PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 612,91 712,36 ANDERSON, GARY & DIANA SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 59.04 59.04 APEX INDUSTRIES FLEET OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 405.95 405.95 APPLE VALLEY VILLA SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 63.00 63.00 ASPEN MILLS FIRE SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 579.20 579,20 B & L ADVENTURES LLC DALSIN MFG TIF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 14,530.24 14,530.24 - N I BELLBOY CORPORATION DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 211,44 C-'-./ - DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 42,09 ... """""R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/1712006 11 :02:42 N Council Check Summary I Page - 2 N 8m2006 - 812012006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 718.57 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 80.92 1,053,02 BELZER'S CHEVlDODGElKIA, JEFF ENGINEERING SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 115.41 115.41 BJ PRODUCTIONS SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 482.00 482,00 BOERBOOM,ROB INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 32.10 32.10 BREISACHER, WAYNE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 9.27 9,27 BUGBEE'S LOCKSMITH BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3.00 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,60 4.60 BURNSVILLE, CITY OF PATROL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,100,00 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 549,17 1,649,17 C&M HOMES ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 4,000.00 4,000.00 CARQUEST PATROL SERVICES VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 279.31 FIRE SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 145.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 45.37 STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 48.35 PARK MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 224.53 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 262.57 FLEET OPERA nONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 768.36 1,773.57 CATARACT FIRE RELIEF ASSOC FIRE SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 31,250.00 31,250.00 COW GOVERNMENT INC HUMAN RESOURCES EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 145.37 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICE SUPPLIES 145.37 290.74 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FAR ON 8/17/2 1:02:42 Council Check Summary Page - 3 8/7/2006 - 8/20/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO STREET MAINTENANCE STREET MATERIALS 183.60 183.60 COMPASS POINT TRAINING PATROL SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 275.00 '75 00 CULLIGAN ULTRAPURE INDUSTRIES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 12,90 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 29,55 42.45 o J 4 LESS RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 600.00 600.00 o R HORTON ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000.00 2,000.00 DAKOTA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFIC POLICE FORFEITURES SALES OF ASSETS 91.00 91,00 DAKOTA COUNTY LICENSE CENTER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY VEHICLE LICENSES, TAXES, FEES 39.50 39.50 DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER SIGNAL MAINTENANCE ELECTRIC 82,39 82.39 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION EMERGENCY MGMT SERVICES ELECTRIC 10,66 FIRE SERVICES ELECTRIC 1,197,81 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE ELECTRIC 4,631.54 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES ELECTRIC 17.74 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE ELECTRIC 1,349.75 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE ELECTRIC 132.41 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE ELECTRIC 11,106.70 18,446,61 DCX LLC SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD 139.00 139,00 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT CENTER WATER UTILITY EXPENSE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 188.93 --\ N WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 188.93 I 377.86 W ~55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/17/2006 11 :02:42 N Council Check Summary Page - 4 I ~ 8/7/2006 - 8/20/2006 Vendor Business Unn Object Amount DICK'S SANITATION INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24,043,80 24,043,80 DISTAD, RANDY RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 71.20 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS MilEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 26,70 97.90 DIVERSIFIED CRYOGENICS PATROL SERVICES VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 215,71 215,71 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY FIRE SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 98.00 98.00 EAGLES-ARIE #4031, FRATERNAL 0 EAGLES CLUB TlF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 5,038.79 5,038,79 EATON PROPERTIES LLC CROP CHARAC TIF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 1,817.99 1,817.99 ECM PUBLISHERS INC ELM ST RECONSTRUCTION ADVERTISING 156.00 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE ADVERTISING 104,00 260.00 ECONO FOODS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 1.48 HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 13.57 POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 31.28 INVESTIGATION SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1.86 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 96.73 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 18.48 SVIIlMMING POOL OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD 21.50 SVIIlMMING POOL OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 5.07 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND COFFEE FUND 4.46 194,43 FAIRFIELD GLASS AND WINDOW INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 725,00 725,00 FARMINGTON BAKERY INC SVIIlMMING POOL OPERATIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 21,60 21.60 FARMINGTON EMPLOYEE CLUB EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE CLUB 51.00 51.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO Vendor FARMINGTON GREENHOUSE FARMINGTON PRINTING INC FARMINGTON, CITY OF FEDEX KINKO'S INC FLANAGAN SALES INC FROEHLlNG,MARK FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS --" N J, FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF AME CITY OF FAR.u ~ ON 8/1712 1 :02:42 Council Check Summary Page. 5 8f712006 - 8/20/2006 Business Unit Object Amount PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,069,67 1,069.67 LEGISLATIVE CONTROL OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.49 ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SIIPPLIES 31311 PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 24,50 362,10 BUILDING INSPECTIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 56.00 POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 27,08 STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE LICENSES, TAXES, FEES 2,00 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 23,29 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD 4,00 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 15.57 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 5.46 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 10,68 NPDES Phase II PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 6,74 150.82 FIRE SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 81,26 81.26 DEPOT WAY ART PARK OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,862,57 EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 2,484,23 4,346,80 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 510.00 510.00 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 2,557.88 POLICE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 1,944,63 ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE TELEPHONE 52,55 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP TELEPHONE 151.74 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE TELEPHONE 151,74 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE TELEPHONE 525.61 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS TELEPHONE 52.55 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE TELEPHONE 157,67 5,594.37 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP TELEPHONE 1,32 1.32 ->R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/17/200611:02:42 N Council Check Summary I Page - 6 0) 81712006 - 8/20/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount GEISE, TRACY GENERAL ACCOUNTING MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 31.06 31.06 GRAHAM FAMILY LIVING TRUST, TH ASH STREET PROJECT LAND 954.00 954.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,875.32 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,427,67 5,302,99 GROSS, TIM ASH STREET PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .80 HILLDEE RECONSTRUCTION MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 14,86 MIL & OVERLAY ANNUAL PRJ MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 13.84 29,50 GS DIRECT INC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES 25.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 25.68 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 25.69 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 25.69 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 25,69 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 25.69 154.13 HAYNES, TRICIA SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 400.00 400,00 HEDBERG AGGREGATES PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 580.10 580.10 HERMEL WHOLESALE SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD 644,05 644,05 HEYER SOLUTIONS INVESTIGATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 250.00 250.00 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC DAISY KNOLL PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 927.49 WESTVlEW ACRES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 927.49 DAKOTA CTY ESTATES PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 927.49 MYSTIC MEADOWS PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 927,50 3,709.97 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARm.. _ TON 8/17/ 11 :02:42 Council Check Summary Page - 7 8f712006 - 8/20/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount HOME DEPOT SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 229.02 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 952,11 1,181.13 HOMES BY CHASE ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000,00 2 000 00 HOMETOWN INC ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000.00 2,000,00 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 127.69 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS CHEMICALS 853.28 980.97 HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY WATER UTILITY EXPENSE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 2,214.43 2.214.43 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND ICMA PAYABLE 4,936.92 4,936.92 IMAGES ON METAL INC RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 562.77 562.77 J G LEASING LLC PRECISION VALVE TIF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 16,334.44 16,334.44 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPAN DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 4,247,09 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 8,665,24 12,912.33 JOHNSON, JILL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100.00 100.00 KEEPRSINC PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 185.90 185,90 KEYLAND HOMES ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000.00 2,000,00 ...... N KORBA. JERRY RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 66.00 I 66,00 ...... .....R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/17/2006 11 :02:42 N Council Check Summary I Page - 8 00 8/7/2006 - 8120/2006 Vendor Business Unn Object Amount KREMER SPRING ALIGNMENT & BODY STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 630,75 630,75 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND LELS DUES PAYABLE 240,50 240,50 LEXISNEXIS INVESTIGATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150,00 150,00 LONE OAK COMPANIES INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 39,60 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 39.61 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 39.60 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 39.61 158.42 M S FOSTER & ASSOCIATES INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 973.00 973.00 M. AMUNDSON LLP DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 566.24 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 874,89 1,441.13 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 6,25 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 6,25 12,50 MANLEY BROTHERS ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000.00 2,000.00 MCDONALDS CORPORATION FIRE SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 90.05 90,05 MCNEARNEY HOMES, ROBERT ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000.00 2,000,00 METRO ALARM DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 255.44 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 191.54 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 145.00 591.98 METROCALL INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 1,88 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE CELLULAR PHO 1.88 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FAR. ..._ TON 8/17/_ 11 :02:42 Council Check Summary Page - 9 8/7/2006 - 8120/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 3,76 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE SAC CHARGE RETAINER 47,569,50 47,569,50 MI"M". ICE; "RE;N" OPER"TIONS E;XPENSE TR/lINING & SIIBSIST/lNCE 12500 125,00 MIDWEST ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE BUILDING & STRUCTURE 10,141.30 10,141,30 MILLER, SUE BUILDING INSPECTIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 20.47 20.47 MINNESOTA AFSCME COUNCIL #5 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND AFSCME UNION DUES PAYABLE 665,37 665.37 MINNESOTA COACHES INC SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 975,00 975,00 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 49,46 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 149,16 198.62 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN 3,552,87 3,552.87 MINNESOTA, STATE OF POLICE FORFEITURES SALES OF ASSETS 45.50 45,50 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 1.314,24 1,314.24 MN DEPT OF REVENUE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND GARNISHMENT PAYABLE 345.59 345.59 MN MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE ASSN INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 720.00 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 720.00 1,440.00 ...... N I MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA LIFE INS PAYABLE 82,00 CO 82.00 -"R55CKSUM LOG23000VO i') I -" o Vendor MOODY COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS MTA SANDBLASTING MVTL LABORATORIES INC NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY NELSON, TANYA NEW YORK, THE BANK OF NEWBAUER,DAN NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS NORTHERN SAF TECHNOLOGY CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/17/200611:02:42 Council Check Summary Page - 10 8f712006 - 8/20/2006 Business Unit Object Amount EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 175.00 175.00 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 2,000.00 2,000.00 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 71.50 71.50 MIL & OVERLAY ANNUAL PRJ EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 5,920,53 5,920.53 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 70.00 70,00 PERM IMP REVOLVING FUND 2001C FISCAL AGENT FEES 250.00 REVENUE BONDS 2001A & 2001B FISCAL AGENT FEES 1,150.00 1,400.00 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 500.00 ADMINISTRATION CELLULAR PHONES 149.49 HUMAN RESOURCES CELLULAR PHONES 54.31 BUILDING INSPECTIONS CELLULAR PHONES 169,51 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CELLULAR PHONES 42,76 PATROL SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 767.20 FIRE SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 217.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 218,09 PARK MAINTENANCE CELLULAR PHONES 330,80 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 167,08 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 179.02 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS CELLULAR PHONES 20.51 DO'M'lTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP CELLULAR PHONES 38.58 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 116,66 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS CELLULAR PHONES 202,73 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 116,67 FLEET OPERATIONS CELLULAR PHONES 54,31 2,845.23 CAPITAL ACQUISITION MACHINERY & MENT 1,881.60 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FAR....., _ ,ON 8/17/2 1:02:42 Council Check Summal}l Page - 11 8f712006 - 8/20/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 1,881.60 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP BUILDING MAINT SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 206,98 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 117,30 324,28 OBERMUELLER, AMANDA RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 70.00 70,00 OFFICEMAX - A BOISE COMPANY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 814,71 814,71 OLWELL, STEVE GENERAL FUND REVENUES RECREATION FEES - GENERAL 25,00 25,00 ORKIN EXTERMINATING BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 89.20 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.97 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.97 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,19 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.97 156.30 PAUSTIS WINE CO, DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 278,00 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 282.49 560,49 PELLICCI HARDWARE & RENTAL POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 70.71 FIRE SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 296,98 FIRE SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 307,99 ENGINEERING SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 174.53 STREET MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 542.82 NATURAL RESOURCES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 47.73 PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 287.97- PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 507.60 PARK MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 141.85 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 460,97 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 57.48 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 1.07 ..... RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 36,20 N I DEPOT WAY ART PARK OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 34,99 ..... SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 37.87 ..... SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 103.09 ~55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/17/200611:02:42 N Council Check Summary Page - 12 I ~ N 81712006 . 8120/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 21.29 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 113,56 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 71,28 ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 620.57 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 34.83 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 25.62 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 137.65 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 92.61 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 101.82 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 127.69 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 189.87 FLEET OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 22.12 4,092.82 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,125.33 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,833.64 3,958.97 PINE BEND LANDFILL INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,776,98 14,776,98 POLFUS IMPLEMENT INC. PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 9,01 9,01 POSTMASTER SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS POSTAGE 500.00 500.00 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 16,408,04 16,408,04 PRO-SWEEP INC PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 131,25 131,25 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA PAYABLE 11,527,30 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA 14,149,16 25,676.46 QUALITY REFRIGERATION INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 927.50 927,50 QUALITY WINE A"- SPIRITS CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS ~ - LD 2,133,38 R55CKSUM LOG,,3000VO CITY OF FAR ON 8/171 11:02:42 Council Check Summary Page - 13 8rT/2006 - 8/20/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,015,21 4,148.59 RADEMACHER, ZACH FIRE SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 26.61 26,61 REAMER,MARK RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,252,00 1,252,00 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION SPRUCE ST EXTENSION LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 163,24 163.24 RENT 'N' SAVE PORTABLE SERVICE PARK MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 834.96 834.96 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 5.61 5.61 RIVER COUNTRY COOPERATIVE FIRE SERVICES FUEL 762,31 762,31 RIVERTOWN NEWPAPER GROUP DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 21.60 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 127,80 149,40 ROC INC FIRE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 216.20 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,883,13 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 858,39 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214.60 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214.60 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 42.92 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214,60 3,644.44 ROSEMOUNT PARK & RECREATION RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 276.00 276.00 RYLAND HOMES ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000.00 --" 2,000,00 N I --" SAVOIE SUPPLY CO. INC, BUILDING MAINT SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 247.83 W 247.83 """"'R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/17/2006 11 :02:42 N I Council Check Summary Page - 14 ...... ~ 81712006 - 8/20/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount SOUTHSIDE TROPHIES RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 1,571,14 1,571,14 SPORTS UNLIMITED RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,460.00 1,460.00 STANGLER, SHERIE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 70.00 70.00 STERLING CODIFIERS INC ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 994.00 994.00 STREICHER'S PATROL SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 539.94 PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44,95 INVESTIGATION SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 130,00 714,89 SUMMIT CUSTOM LANDSCAPE INC PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 170,00 170.00 SUMMIT SUPPLY CORPORATION WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,906.35 1,906.35 SUNDGREN,MARK INVESTIGATION SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 10.00 INVESTIGATION SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 56.20 66.20 SWEDIN, MICHELE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 25.48 25.48 TEE JAY NORTH INC SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 1,413.00 1,413.00 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO. FLEET OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 612.53 612.53 TIME MAGAZINE POLICE ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 19,95 19,95 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION POLICE ADMINISTRATION VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 264.92- BUILDING MAINT SERVICES EQUIPMENT REP SERVICE 1,071.19 . R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FAR ON 8/17/ 1 :02:42 Council Check Summary Page - 15 8nt2006 - 8/20/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 806.27 TROPHIES PLUS POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 67.04 67.04 TROPHY HOUSE INC, THE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 266 78 266,78 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE POLICE ADMINISTRATION POSTAGE 8,66 FIRE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,99 17,65 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE COMMUNICATIONS POSTAGE 2,000,00 2,000,00 VALMONT INDUSTRIES INC LEXINGTON STD TIF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 23,531.57 23,531.57 VERIZON WIRELESS FIRE SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 7,61 7.61 WENDLANDT,BRENDA ESCROW FUND PREPAID EXPENSES 500,00 500.00 WINE MERCHANTS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 197,84 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,072,56 1,270.40 WlNGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE TIRES 612,53 612,53 WOODY, MICHAEL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 550.00 550,00 WRIGHT EXPRESS FLEET SERVICES BUILDING INSPECTIONS FUEL 477.60 PATROL SERVICES FUEL 4,519.86 FIRE SERVICES FUEL 836,90 ENGINEERING SERVICES FUEL 555.89 ...... STREET MAINTENANCE FUEL 2,043.30 N NATURAL RESOURCES FUEL 299.99 I ...... PARK MAINTENANCE FUEL 1,894.28 en BUILDING MAINT SERVICES FUEL 239.31 ....R55CKSUM LOG23000VO N I .... 0) Vendor Business Unn RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES DOIM'lTOIM'l LIQUOR REV & EXP PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE FLEET OPERATIONS POLICE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINT SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC STREET MAINTENANCE ZEE SERVICE COMPANY POLICE ADMINISTRATION ZIEGLER INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VALS: SODERBERG FOGARTY MCKNIGHT PRITZLAFF WILSON CITY OF FARMINGTON Council Check Summary 8nt2006 - 8/2012006 Object FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS Report Totals Amount 366.61 18.80 18.80 237,25 4,946.39 393.70 215,91 172,68 17,237.27 419,742,89 203.13 58,20 72,77 72.77 14.55 72,77 494,19 341,61 341,61 8/17/2006 11 :02:42 Page - 16 861.05 861,05 82,14 82.14 . <,