The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08.07.06 Council Packet City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA PRE-CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 7, 2006 6:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA 5. STAFF COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT ouncil workshops are conducted as an informal work session, all discussions shall be considered fact-finding, hypothetical and unofficial critical thinking exercises, which do not reflect an official public position. Council work session outcomes should not be construed by the attending public and/or reporting media as the articulation of a formal City policy position. Only official Council action normally taken at a regularly scheduled Council meeting should be considered as a formal expression of the City's position on any given matter. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 7, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS a) MRPA Award of Excellence Presentation b) Northern Dakota County Chamber c) Acknowledge Retirement Police Department Proclaim Chief Siebenaler Day d) Citizens Police Academy - Council e) Recognize Tae Kwon Do Group 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) a) Response to Mr. Jerry Ristow - Engineering 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (7/17/06 Regular) b) June 2006 Financial Report - Finance c) Acknowledge Retirement Police Department - Human Resources d) Appointment Recommendation Parks and Recreation - Human Resources e) Acknowledge Resignation Finance - Human Resources f) Appoint Election Judges - Administration g) Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation h) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation Pollution Prevention Day - Parks and Recreation i) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation Rambling River Center - Parks and Recreation j) Schedule Assessment Hearing ~ 2006 Seal Coat Project - Engineering k) Schedule Assessment Hearing - 2006 Mill and Overlay Project- Engineering 1) Schedule Assessment Hearing ~ Hill Dee Reconstruction Project - Engineering Action Taken Presented Award Information Received Acknowledged Information Received Recognized Information Received Approved Information Received Acknowledged Approved Acknowledged R81-06 Information Received R82-06 R83-06 R84-06 R85-06 R86-06 m) Adopt Resolution - Authorize Advertisement of Bids 20Sth Street Project- Engineering n) School and Conference - Police 0) Appointment Recommendation Interim Police Chief - Administration p) Adopt Resolution - Identify Voting Member for Dakota Communications Center - Police q) 2006 State of Dakota County - Community Development r) Schedule Council Workshop - Administration s) Cataract Relief Association Pension Request - Administration t) Approve Bills u) Approve Fire Department Service Agreement - Administration 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Approve Grading Conditional Use Permit - Christensen Property- Community Development 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Accept Results Community Survey - Administration b) Consider Parks and Recreation Referendum Options - Parks and Recreation c) Consider One Year Extension of Recycling Contract - Parks and Recreation 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Approve Castle Rock Township Orderly Annexation Agreement- Community Development b) Consider Mock and Olson Annexation Petitions - Administration 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE a) Liquor Store Check Acceptance Policy - Finance 14. ADJOURN R87-06 Information Received Sgt. Brian Lindquist R88-06 Information Received August 15, 2006 Information Received Approved Approved Approved Accepted Tabled Fall 2007 Approved Motion Failed Public Hearing 9/18/06 Information Received City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation, the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 7, 2006 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENDATIONS a) MRPA Award of Excellence Presentation b) Northern Dakota County Chamber c) Acknowledge Retirement Police Department d) Citizens Police Academy - Council 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Openfor Audience Comments) a) Response to Mr. Jerry Ristow - Engineering 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (7/17/06 Regular) b) June 2006 Financial Report - Finance c) Acknowledge Retirement Police Department - Human Resources d) Appointment Recommendation Parks and Recreation - Human Resources e) Acknowledge Resignation Finance - Human Resources f) Appoint Election Judges - Administration g) Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation h) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation Pollution Prevention Day - Parks and Recreation i) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation Rambling River Center - Parks and Recreation j) Schedule Assessment Hearing - 2006 Seal Coat Project - Engineering k) Schedule Assessment Hearing - 2006 Mill and Overlay Project- Engineering 1) Schedule Assessment Hearing - Hill Dee Reconstruction Proj ect - Engineering m) Adopt Resolution - Authorize Advertisement of Bids 20Sth Street Project- Engineering Action Taken Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 n) School and Conference - Police 0) Appointment Recommendation Interim Police Chief - Administration p) Adopt Resolution - Identify Voting Member for Dakota Communications Center - Police q) 2006 State of Dakota County - Community Development r) Schedule Council Workshop - Administration s) Cataract Relief Association Pension Request - Administration t) Approve Bills 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Approve Grading Conditional Use Permit - Christensen Property- Community Development 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Accept Results Community Survey - Administration b) Consider Parks and Recreation Referendum Options - Parks and Recreation c) Consider One Year Extension of Recycling Contract - Parks and Recreation 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Approve Castle Rock Township Orderly Annexation Agreement - Community Development b) Consider Mock and Olson Annexation Petitions - Administration 12. NEWBUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE a) Liquor Store Check Acceptance Policy - Finance 14. ADJOURN Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Sa..... City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administratc(J FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Minnesota Recreation Park Association's Award of Excellence DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION Staff submitted an A ward of Excellence nomination form to the Minnesota Recreation Park Association (MRP A) for the "Show You Care Buy a Chair" fundraising project. The project scored high enough to receive an Award of Excellence from the MRP A. DISCUSSION Chris Esser from the MRPA Awards Committee will be attending the August 7, 2006 City Council meeting to present an A ward of Excellence plaque for the partnership created between the City and the Dakota Dreamcatchers 4H Club that resulted in the successful completion of the "Show You Care Buy a Chair" fundraising project. ACTION REQUESTED The only action needed is to publicly recognize and thank the Dakota Dreamcatchers 4H Club for their fundraising efforts. )f/tf~lY M ' ~ad, Parks and Recreation Director Page 1 of 1 56 P-"-r Herlofsky From: Ruthe Batulis [rbatulis@ndcchambers.com] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:58 PM To: Peter Herlofsky Cc: Chad Collignon; mark_kragness@anchorlink.com; sara@galaxy-travel.com Subject: EGC Thank you for meeting with us last week. We would like to be on the City Council Agenda for Monday Aug 7. This draft document can be included in the packet for Council members. Our request is: 1. Consideration of adoption of the resolution. 2. Implementation on the Economic Growth Committee. Speakers will be Ruthe Batulis on behalf of Northern Dakota County Chambers of Commerce (framing of the Chamber Economic Development Policy) Mark Kragness, Chair Farmington Area Business Council of NDC Chambers, NDC Board member Chad Collignon, Farmington Area Business Council, NDC Board member. If you need any more information, please let me know. Best regards, Rut"e Ruthe Batulis President Northern Dakota County Chambers of Commerce 1121 Town Centre Drive, Suite #102 Eagan, MN 55123 651.452.9872 Phone 651.452.8978 Fax rpQt1Jnlis@ndcchambers.cOJ]] www.ndcchambers.com This email is a private confidential communication to the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this email communication or the authorized employee or agent for delivering this message to the intended recipient, notify the sender upon receipt and delete this email without reading, printing, or using it. 7/1 7/2006 PROPOSAL TO CREATE ECONOMIC GROWTH COMMITTEE DRAFT CITY OF FARMINGTON AND NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - FARMINGTON PROPOSAL: The formation of a new jointly recognized entity by the City Council of the City of Farmington and the Farmington Business Council of Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce to herein be referred to as the Economic Growth Committee. PURPOSE: The Economic Growth Committee is an advisory body to the City Council for the purpose of assisting in appropriate efforts to expand the tax base and increase job opportunities. FACTORS: The Farmington Area Business Council identifies economic development and redevelopment as a high priority and an important function for the economic well being of the City of Farmington, and The Farmington Area Business Council believes it is important to work cooperatively with the City of Farmington and the townships of Castle Rock, Empire and Eureka developing a public/private sector partnership for the economic growth effort of the Farmington area, and The Farmington Area Business Council believes the Economic Growth Committee shall be a resource in assisting the City Council and city staff in addressing various economic growth issues, and The Farmington Area Business Council believes the Economic Growth Committee shall be involved in the strategic planning process as it relates to economic development and redevelopment, and The Farmington Area Business Council believes the Economic Growth Committee shall continue for a period as long as the City Council of the City of Farmington and the Farmington Area Business Council of the Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce shall deem necessary. MISSION: The Farmington Area Business Council recognizes the mission of the Economic Growth Committee is as follows: 1. Receive input from and provide recommendations to the City Council 2. Act as a sounding board for development and redevelopment projects 3. Assist in strategic planning and marketing for the City of Farmington 4. SeNe as a working committee with the ability to form task forces and special committees to accomplish goals and objectives 5. Take pulse of the community with regard to image and retention of businesses. GOALS: The Farmington Area Business Council recognizes the Economic Growth Committee shall develop goals as follows: 1. Consistent with those established by the City Council 2. Take a proactive approach to city economic development and redevelopment 3. Provide employment opportunities, continued retention of jobs and enhancement of the tax base 4. Actively promote research, development and redevelopment of office/industrial parks 5. Promote research, development and redevelopment of historic downtown Farmington 6. Recognize the importance of the retail sector to the overall economic well being of the City of Farmington WORK PLAN: The Farmington Area Business Council recognizes the Economic Growth Committee shall establish an annual Work Plan that will be submitted to the City Council and Farmington Area Business Council for approval. MEMBERSHIP: The Farmington Area Business Council recognizes the Economic Growth Committee will consist offourteen (14) select members who are either residents of or do business in the Farmington area. Seven members will be appointed by the City Council and seven members will be appointed by the Farmington Area Business Council of Northern Dakota County Chambers of Commerce. Members will be appointed by the following categories and count: CateQorv Financial Institution Development Landowner Business Owner Utilities Education City Council Member Business Council Member At Large/Townships City 1 1 1 1 o 1 1 o 1 Chamber 1 1 1 1 1 o o 1 1 Appointments made to the Committee shall be for a three year term with a maximum continual service of three three-year terms or a total of nine years. The appointment and term of "Council Member" and "Business Council Member" categories shall be at the discretion of the City Council and Farmington Area Business Council respectively. Interim replacements shall be appointed by the appropriate Council and shall fill the term of the resigning member. The City Administrator or his/her designee and Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce President shall serve as ex-officio members of the Economic Growth Committee. FINANCES: Funding for the Economic Growth Committee will be budgeted by the City Council, Economic Development Authority and/or Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce. Standard financial and expenditure procedures will be followed according to the funding source and policies of the funding source. OFFICERS: A Chair and Vice Chair shall be elected by a majority vote of the Committee membership. The Chair and Vice Chair will serve one-year terms with a three year limit on successive terms. WORKING COMMITTEES/TASK FORCES: Any and all working committees and Task Forces shall be formed by consensus of the Committee. Any member of the Economic Growth Committee may serve on such Committees/Task Forces. Chairpersons of such groups shall be appointed by the Chair of the Economic Growth Committee. Any appropriate non-Economic Growth Committee members may be appointed by the Chair of the Committee/Task Force. SPECIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCES/STUDIES: Membership on Special Economic Development Task Forces/Studies shall consist of appointments by appropriate parties to ensure balanced representation. Representative No. Appointed Bv: City Council 1 City Council Business Council 1 Business Council Planning Commission 1 Planning Commission At Large/Township 1 City Council EGC 1 EGC Chair EGC Chair 1 EGC Chair Ex-officio staff of the city and chamber If appropriate the following: Parks & Rec 1 Affected Parties max= 4 Parks and Rec Director Identified and selected by EGC Chair and approved by City Council The Chair of the Economic Growth Committee shall serve as Chairperson of such Special Economic Development Task Force/Studies. If a conflict is apparent regarding the appointments of any members, the City Council shall have the final decision. REPORTING: A report will be provided annual to the City Council of the City of Farmington and Farmington Area Business Council. NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Economic Growth Committee shall continue and carry out the responsibilities herein contained. Passed and duly adopted this day of , by the Farmington Area Business Council of the Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce. XXX, Chair, Farmington Area Business Council ATTEST: Ruthie Batulis, President, Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce 5G City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator FROM: Brian Lindquist Sergeant, Farmington Police SUBJECT: Naming August 11,2006 as Chief Dan Siebenaler Day DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION AND ACTION REQUESTED For the past 17 years the City of Farmington has known one Police Chief. During this same time several neighboring cities have had many command changes. Chief Siebenaler is responsible for the hiring of all but two current members of a 22 person department. This department is his legacy and gift to the City of Farmington. Among its members you will find a group of officers who exhibit the highest level of dedication, integrity and moral justice. This is not just a job for them it is a calling. Chief Siebenaler has led, coached, guided and molded the Farmington Police Department into a premiere law enforcement agency that is proud to serve the citizens of Farmington. Agencies will often take on the face of their leaders; this department has done exactly that. Officers have ownership in the mission of the Farmington Police Department and feel strongly about upholding its core values. There is not enough time to talk about the role Chief Siebenaler has played in the lives of so many; we need only look at the admiration of those who have worked with and followed Chief Siebenaler to understand the impact he has made on all of us. DISCUSSION The naming of August 11,2006 as Chief Dan Siebenaler Day. Respectfully submitted, $41/ Brian Lindquist cc: file ?~ COUNCIL MINUTES PRE-MEETING JULY 17, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 6:30 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant 2. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA Councilmember Pritzlaff asked about the second quarter building report and where we are as far as a dollar amount. Finance Director Roland stated the financial report for the first six months of the year will be available at the next Council meeting. As of June 30, 2006 we are at 47% of the revenue for permits. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked about the Medical Direction Agreement if the new clinic would affect this. Police Chief Siebenaler replied no, the Medical Director position is an oversight position. It is where staff receives authority to use defibrillators. Mayor Soderberg included the response to Mr. Jerry Ristow's comments as part of the Council packet. 5. STAFF COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN MOTION by Fogarty, second by Pritzlaffto adjourn at 6:34 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Council Minutes (Pre-Meeting) July 17, 2006 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, ~}-v7~ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR JULY 17,2006 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Soderberg led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Audience: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson None Joel J amnik, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Bev Preece, Doug Bonar, Nick & Stacy Schultz, Sandi Amundson, Pat & Al Larson, Mary Lebens, Rick Bugbee, Randy Oswald, Brenda Reedy, Ed Samuelson, Sherry Buss, Joel Serrano, Brad Meeks, Bryce Olson, Dave Steinke, John Kapustka, Bev Ersfeld, Sarah Miller, Krista Flemming 4. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS a) Introduce New Employee - Police Department b) Oath of Office - Police Officer - Administration Police Chief Dan Siebenaler introduced Jason Amundson as a new Police Officer. City Administrator Herlofsky administered the Oath of Office. Police Chief Dan Siebenaler announced his retirement as of August 11, 2006. He thanked the past and present leadership of the City of Farmington for the opportunity to serve the City. It's staff and especially it's citizens - this is a great City and he has been blessed to serve here for 27 years. Mayor Soderberg stated his leadership has been amazing, a source of inspiration, and a blessing to the City. Without a doubt he made Farmington a better place by being here. Thank you is not adequate but it will have to do for now. !, c) Rambling River Days Certificates of Appreciation Mayor Soderberg read the names of the Rambling River Days volunteers and they were given a Certificate of Appreciation. Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 2 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS a) Response to Mr. Jerry Ristow - Council Mr. Ristow was given a response to his comments at the beginning of the meeting. Mr. Ristow stated he asked four questions, two pertained to three of the Councilmembers and two pertained to Mayor Soderberg and Councilmember Fogarty. He stated the public is waiting for a response to his questions. He stated his questions were: 1. Is it realistic to assess a property two years in a row with back to back assessments? 2. What is the total cost of staff time that was put into the school project? 3. To Mayor Soderberg and Councilmember Fogarty - why was a school delay even necessary? What did he miss? 4. What are the reasons why they did not vote for a zoning change in August 2005? Mayor Soderberg stated in the response to Mr. Ristow he explained regarding the mill and overlay project, there was a public hearing and Council heard concerns from citizens regarding the project and the impact of having assessments back to back. Council also heard from the engineers regarding the uncertainty of the cost to do the project and the uncertainty of the street to last as far as the surface. In addition, there are curbs and gutters that are cracked and broken in various spots. After weighing those concerns Council did decide to move forward with the mill and overlay project. There was a public hearing, a vote, bids were received, and construction has started. If people are concerned about being assessed two years in a row, Council discussed deferring the assessment if people chose to do that. It might not be beneficial for them to do that, but they can if they want to. This can be done if there is a hardship, but Council also talked about deferring payments on the assessment itself. It will not be of much benefit because interest will still be accruing. This was a split vote. It is not pleasant, but it is necessary. Mayor Soderberg stated the proj ect was identified in the Pavement Management Program and has already been delayed one year. Mayor Soderberg stated as far as the concern with stafftime regarding the school district, once the school district initiated a lawsuit there was no stafftime outside of the City Attorney and the City Engineer. Those items were identified. Ifthere was staff time it is because Council asked someone to make copies or distribute some things, but it was minimal at best and in the course of their duties to support Council. It had nothing to do with the school project outside of that. There would have been no staff time identified. Regarding the decision, Justice Gilbert identified it best in saying the City and the school district had legitimate differences of opinion regarding the terms and conditions of moving forward on the Flagstaff site. Through the course of the lawsuit and the mediation process those differences of opinion were worked out and we are moving forward. To keep revisiting that does not serve the school district's or the City's interests. Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 3 Both the City and School District have decided to bury the past, move forward, and look to the future. We have established a great working relationship and we are going to continue to move forward in that vein. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated he spoke with Mr. Ristow a couple times regarding the mill and overlay project. When discussions began on the project he received a call from a resident on Centennial Court asking why they are doing a mill and overlay project there. Councilmember Pritzlaff drove the whole neighborhood and walked the streets. He asked Assistant City Engineer Gross as he did not see the roads were broken up or a lot of potholes. Staff told him it is not broken up, and to do a mill and overlay now would be more of a maintenance issue for the road, rather than a reconstruct. He was told a sea1coat would not stick to the roads. The snow plows would peel that away over the winter. Councilmember Pritzlaff attended the neighborhood meeting on the project. There were a lot of questions as to what this would do. The sewer lines are in good shape and nothing needs to be done to the sewer for several years. He did not like the back to back assessments and made that clear. However, if some type of maintenance was not done on this road in the next 1-3 years, in a short time there would have to be a total reconstruct which would cost a lot more. The City would not be able to assess for more as the City can only assess 35% ofthe appraisal. Right now the appraised value for the mill and overlay is $2,000. If there was a total reconstruct costing another $1,000 the City may not get that money out of it. The City could assess the residents, but it will come back to the residents ofthe City as more money will have to be taken from the general fund to pay for the project. That convinced him they needed to do maintenance now rather than a total reconstruct in a few years. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated regarding the school issue and the money that was spent, the School Board made the decision to file for litigation. The City made the decision to defend themselves. Any money spent in defending ourselves is in the course of action. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated he and Mr. Ristow drove around the City and there are roads in worse shape. Walnut Street is in the CIP for a total reconstruct in 2008, so the City will not be doing maintenance on a road that will be torn up in two years. The mill and overlay project was adopted in the CIP on December 20, 2004. It is not good to have back to back assessments, but Councilmember Pritzlaff stated he had to do what he thought was best for the taxpayers' money and not spend a larger amount for a total reconstruct. When the engineers say a road is ready, that is what Council has to go by. At some point they have to take the advice of the professionals. Councilmember Wilson stated he will make his comments during Roundtable. Councilmember McKnight asked Mr. Ristow ifhe received his response. Mr. Ristow stated he did and it was well written. Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 4 Councilmember Fogarty stated she and Mr. Ristow talked several times over the last couple weeks. She agrees with Councilmember Pritzlaff on the mill and overlay and she and Mr. Ristow will have to agree to disagree on this issue. As far as the high school, Mr. Ristow thought it might be helpful for Councilmember Fogarty to elaborate to help people understand the complications of the litigation. Councilmember Fogarty corrected Mr. Ristow on a comment he said she made that people could not understand this. Councilmember Fogarty said she did not say people could not understand this. She said it was a terribly complicated issue to understand. One issue the City and the school district disagreed on was 20Sth Street. The school district did exactly what they should have done for themselves. They needed more ballfields and they were putting them in what was supposed to have been the right-of-way for 20Sth Street. They had to have the ballfields for instructional purposes and for practice fields. It was part of the complex and critical to their project. On the flip side as a Councilmember, one of the most important things she has to do is to ensure safe roads and good transportation routes. That road and that right-of-way is very critical to the City to be maintained. There was a legitimate difference of opinion. Neither party was wrong in what they were asserting for their respective bodies. It was a true disagreement and something that could not be ignored. It had to be resolved one way or another. If people look back to the original sketch plan and the one that is now proposed, they will see that 20Sth Street has been moved. That went through a lot of negotiation and hard work. They had to talk to Dakota County because it is a major east-west corridor and considered a collector street for the City. One day that will run from Cedar Avenue to TH3. By moving it to the northern part of the side, they had to cross another person's property. They had to determine who will achieve the right-of-way from that property owner, who is responsible for paying for it, how will it be acquired, and it changed the entire route for that road long term. That changed how it will be on the other side of Flagstaff. Now it is crossing a wetland, so wetland mitigation has to be resolved. With the wetland mitigation, both sides had to determine who would pay for the wetland mitigation, and how that would be accomplished. This is an example of how neither body was wrong in fighting for what they wanted. It was terribly complicated. They had to involve outside parties, talk to soil and water, talk to Dakota County to make sure if they changed the route, that it would be approved later. This is one example ofthree dozen issues. It was not an easy task to get done and everyone worked very hard on it. Justice Gilbert said in all his years of working he has never seen a more complicated lawsuit. Mr. Ristow stated the night of the meeting it was a land use issue to change the comp plan and the zoning and that has nothing to do with that. The land was zoned as urban reserve. Mr. Ristow stated he and three other neighbors in Chateau Manor visited with some of the residents there to show their dissatisfaction on what the Council is doing and believe Council should have been more responsive and taken more incentive in the road project than they have done. Jeff Thelen, Mike Morton, Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 5 Jerry Benoit and Mr. Ristow visited the neighbors. He received a 2006 map showing the mill and overlay from City Administrator Herlofsky. There are 117 properties on the map and six belong to the City in the park area by the pool, two belong to Mayor Soderberg, and one was a City employee and reserved the right not to sign the petition. He had 80% of the neighborhood sign a petition stating the residents of Chateau Manor oppose the mill and grinding project to their road at this time and the second assessment in as many years because of this unnecessary project. People who were at the Council meeting told Mr. Ristow they did not raise their hand because they felt they had Mr. Morton and Mr. Gerten speak on behalf ofthem. They felt a good majority of the comments fell on deaf ears. Responding to Councilmember Pritzlaff, Mr. Ristow stated it is based on the amount of the road being done. A mill and overlay could cost a great deal of money unless you have a class action lawsuit and everyone joins in to object to $2,000 in additional value to the property. If you do a complete reconstruct it will raise it. Mr. Ristow had a few more questions from residents affected by the mill and overlay project. 1. Centennial Circle is getting new curb and a new road. Why a new road and will they pay a higher assessment? Will the assessments vary depending on the amount of new curb per property? 2. When the City put new catch basins and storm sewers in Sunnyside Drive and Fairview Lane with the Ash Street project, which they all paid for, were they not needed? Why put in storm sewers if we did not need them? 3. We have no storm sewers other than on Heritage Way and Park Drive. There is a lot of area where the water has to flow where there are no catch basins in between. Mr. Ristow stated it is Council's responsibility to look out for the community as a whole for the health, the welfare, and the safety of all the residents. Council did not look at all the roads or the engineers. There are roads that are in way more critical shape than this. Two of them are by a school where people travel everyday. Their roads are traveled by the people that live there. 4. Would you allow a developer to come in with a plat and not have any storm sewer, just curb and gutter? He did not think so, but Council is doing it. The City is tearing out curb that is 6-14 inches thick. He did not believe they will put that much back and a lot of that curb is in good shape. 5. If a mill and overlay is only one inch, how far down do the cracks and potholes go? He stated Councilmember Pritzlaff said that the cracks and the potholes go into the base of the road. Mr. Ristow stated he had 25 years of experience in blacktopping and road construction. He knows a little about it and he did his research when he was on the Council. Anything that he was not sure of, he was not saying he did not trust staff, but he always researched it so he knew what he was talking about. The cracks and the potholes have to go more than an inch thick. By grinding it you will not save the base of the road. Mr. Ristow stated there was a mix-up with the Ash Street project. Until the assessment hearing was set and heard assessments are not due on that road until Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 6 30 days after the assessment hearing. Finance Director Roland stated Mr. Ristow is referring to the pending assessments. Once the project is ordered it is considered a pending assessment so that anyone who is in the process of selling or buying a property needs to be aware of any pending assessments on a property because they need to be resolved at the time of closing. The assessment is not levied until such time as the assessment hearing takes place and the Council votes on that assessment. The residents have the opportunity to protest or to be heard regarding their desire not to be assessed. It is not levied and due until the time of the assessment hearing. Mr. Ristow stated a couple people claim they already paid the assessment. They went to Hastings and paid $985. Mr. Ristow asked them how they could do that when it has not been set. There was also a lot of discussion about the Ash Street project and that they did not get a bill. Mr. Ristow left the petition with Council. Councilmember Fogarty asked ifMr. Ristow asked these questions at the open house on July 6 or if the residents attended the meeting and were they not satisfied with the answers. These are very technical questions and it seemed to her the experts should be answering these questions. She is not an engineer and asking how deep the potholes go in the pavement is a technical question. Mr. Ristow replied she voted for it and she should have known. Councilmember Fogarty stated she trusts the professionals to tell her the project is necessary. Mayor Soderberg stated City Engineer Mann will reply to his questions. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated if their professionals, City Engineer Mann and Assistant City Engineer Gross, said that if a mill and overlay is done it would preserve the road for 10-15 years, the first thing someone would say is can they have a written guarantee. There is not a written guarantee that road will stay another 10-15 years. He asked City Engineer Mann to address the appraised value from an assessment to a total reconstruct and that it would cost more money out of the general fund. City Engineer Mann replied that is correct based on how projects have been funded in the past. A full reconstruct would be much more expensive than a mill and overlay, therefore, there would be a higher price to everyone. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated we could not assess for that much more. City Engineer Mann stated not for the difference. There would be a percentage increase in what is assessed to the residents and there would be a similar percentage increase to the City's general fund because the appraisal would not allow the full amount to be assessed to the resident, because the appraisal puts a cap on it. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked if a mill and overlay would preserve the road for 10 years. City Engineer Mann replied typically that is the case, 10-15 years. He will provide a written response to Mr. Ristow's questions for the next meeting. b) Response to Ms. Justine Jacobson - Engineering A response to Ms. Jacobson's comments was mailed to her. Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 7 7. j) CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approved Council Minutes (7/3/06 Regular) b) Received Information First Half Building Report - Community Development c) Received Information School and Conference - Finance d) Adopted RESOLUTION R74-06 Approving Gambling Event Permit- Administration Acknowledged Resignation Public Works - Human Resources Councilmember Wilson stated Council is accepting the resignation of Tim Gross, an extremely talented individual. He has provided exceptional leadership to the City in a number of different capacities and wished him well in his future endeavors. Acknow ledged Resignation Public Works - Human Resources Terminated Medical Direction Agreement - Human Resources Approved Medical Direction Agreement - Police Department Adopted RESOLUTION R75-06 Approving Grant Agreement with Dakota County Traffic Safety Group - Police Department Adopted RESOLUTION R76-06 Accepting Donation Dew Run - Parks and Recreation Mayor Soderberg thanked EconoFoods, Bruegger's Bagels, Runner's Gate and Pearson's for their donations. k) Approved Bills APIF, MOTION CARRIED. e) f) g) h) i) 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Approve Conditional Use Permit Borrow Pit Operation ISD 192 - Community Development ISD 192 has applied for a CUP for a borrow pit to mine sand from Meadowview Elementary School and haul it to the site for the new high school on Flagstaff Avenue. This would include 5.8 acres of an existing hilltop and they are looking to extract 60,000 cubic yards of granular material. The hilltop will be reduced from 50 ft. in height to 10 ft. Upon completion ofthe operation the borrow pit will be seeded with native grass. The mining is proposed to start on August 21, 2006 which would include the stripping of the topsoil at the borrow pit location. The overall operation would last one week. The majority of the hauling would be done on the Meadowview property, across the river to Flagstaff Avenue, and south to the high school site. The school has received favorable responses from agencies regarding the haul route. Flagstaff would be closed from 200th Street south to CR50. The road would be open to construction vehicles and local traffic including farming equipment. The closure of the road would be dependent upon the final approval of the EA W in early September. The tentative road closure is scheduled from September 5,2006 to October 17, 2006. Any revision to these dates will be forwarded to Council and the affected residents. Neighborhood meetings will be held to address residents' concerns. The contractor is required to install traffic signage, provide dust control and provide continual maintenance of Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 8 Flagstaffbetween 19Sth Street and CRSO during the construction period. Staff recommended approval of the CUP subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must obtain final City approval of the mining operation and the rough grading plan from the City Engineer. 2. The applicant must pay any applicable fees, provide adequate surety in an amount and form approved by the Director of Public Works, and comply with any other reasonable conditions imposed by the Director of Public Works. 3. All excavation activities must be consistent with plans submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works. Mayor Soderberg asked why there will be a road closure. Mr. Doug Bonar, ISD 192, replied a road closure was discussed during the bi-weekly meetings. There should be some concern with construction trucks coming down Flagstaff and they want to preserve the interests of the residents along Flagstaff. Councilmember McKnight asked why they would start the mining before the EA W is approved. Mr. Bonar replied it would be preliminary work onsite and they would not be moving sand offsite. Councilmember McKnight asked what this will be used for on the high school project and where it will go on the high school site. Mr. Dave Peterson, of Mortenson, replied it will be left up to the bidding firms to decide what to use it for. There is a large need for the sand for use on the site. It could be used for utility pipelines, for underlaying of paving, it could be used in a number of ways. It will be left up to the contractors to determine that. This is a large amount of soil that saves the project a considerable amount of money by using it on the high school project versus importing it from a local pit. Councilmember McKnight asked if this was on the Christensen property. Mr. Peterson replied the borrow pit is on the Meadowview property and brought south down Flagstaff to the high school site. There is a stockpile location on the map as a suggestion to bidders, but they do not determine means and methods and leave that up to their best judgment. Councilmember Wilson stated the entire fill that is proposed for the new site will that be contained in a specific area to be used within the project site itself. Mr. Peterson replied the entire amount mined from the borrow pit will be used at the high school site. Councilmember Wilson stated it seems there are two critical decisions that are coming. One being the EA Wand the other is Met Council approval of the zoning. He asked if they should wait for both approvals prior to fill being moved to the project area. Mr. Peterson felt there was a reasonable comfort level in those votes moving forward. It is more a matter of when that occurs. It is the district's property and it is an available source of material that will benefit the project. To the degree the project is moving ahead, they felt it was prudent to capture the use of the soils in the bid package that went out today to get that financial savings for the project. He did not feel it was a large risk. Mayor Soderberg assumed that by doing the excavation while waiting for the Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 9 permit approvals would move the process along. It is quicker to move it once it is already mined. Councilmember Pritzlaff clarified that an NPDES permit is required. He asked how this affects drainage at both sites. Mr. Peterson stated addressing the borrow pit site, the consultant has designed a grading plan to accommodate the amount of materials removed and its final configuration. They are taking a large hill and making it a small hill. There should be the same characteristics of drainage as there were before. Regarding the high school site, Mr. Peterson stated they are bringing in hundreds of thousands of yards of dirt on the new site. This is a small fraction of the amount of earthwork that will be moving. It is being incorporated into the overall design of the site. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked ifthere will be any need for ponding. Mr. Peterson replied no. They will have the proper erosion control measures in place. There is no need for ponding at the borrow pit site. Councilmember Pritzlaff understood the fill was going more on the Christensen property for construction trailers and parking lots than the 60,000 yards going to the school site. Mr. Peterson replied the site plan shows the office complex south of the property line. There is a need for a small amount of sand to level that area to allow them to mobilize the trailers. It is a timing between the approval of the borrow pit permits and the high school permits. Since the borrow pit permits occur earlier than the high school, they can utilize those materials to allow them to mobilize and get set up. They want to be onsite before the main high school work begins. They are sitting on the crest of the land now and would be filling from that point to Flagstaff Avenue. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked if anything remaining on the Christensen property after the proj ect is done would be removed. Mr. Peterson stated the intent of the area off the property line where the trailers will sit is to restore that to agricultural use. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked about the grade elevation and if it would be the same topography as it is today. Mr. Peterson replied he could not make that assumption. Mr. Bonar stated there will also be a road construction project with Flagstaff and to their knowledge the elevation in that area will be raised by 11 ft., so it will have an impact on that property and all other adjoining properties. It is the school's intent to continue negotiations with the Christensen's for the 4 acre parcel. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked how much the mining will cost. Mr. Bonar replied it is incorporated into a much larger bid package. The value of the sand is $600,000. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked about the amount remaining on the Christensen property, and is the school district getting any revenue from the Christensen's for the fill that is left there. Dr. Meeks replied ifthere is any significant material left over they have many other projects where they could reuse the material on another site. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated if the majority of the 60,000 yards is going to the school site, he was lead to believe this was the best site topography wise, why do we need that much fill for this site. Dr. Meeks stated as far as the material remaining on the Christensen site, they have made no deals that the material would stay there. There will be significant soil work on any of their sites. He did not believe they said they would not have to do any grading or site work. Councilmember Pritzlaffwas shocked this amount offill Council Minutes (Regular) July 17,2006 Page 10 was needed. At the Planning Commission meeting there was a question with the fill going from a public entity which the taxpayers paid for with an elementary school, to a private property owner, the Christensen's, and was the school district not being reimbursed for that. Dr. Meeks stated they have not had that discussion. Councilmember Fogarty stated what was presented at the Planning Commission is a little different from what they are hearing now. She got the impression that the borrow site was to completely fill in the staging area. She wanted to make sure the School Board and the administration understands she has a little concern with starting to expend taxpayer dollars before they have Met Council approval. She agreed it was the school's decision. Mayor Soderberg was confident approval would be granted. It is a good idea to get a jump on the construction. If getting the mining started helps, Council should support it. He asked if the 60,000 yards would be adequate. Mr. Peterson stated they anticipate additional sand will have to be trucked in to complete the high school project. This will be done over the course of the entire project. Mr. Nick Schultz, 18869 Euclid Path, agreed with Councilmember Fogarty to wait a couple days in case the Met Council does not approve this. Why spend the money and then not have it approved. Mayor Soderberg stated that would be a concern for the school district. For Council to delay approving the mining permit could put the project back a couple weeks and they do not want to slow things down for the school district. MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by McKnight, second by Fogarty to approve the Conditional Use Permit for mining of a borrow pit at the southeastern portion ofthe Meadowview Elementary School property subject to the above conditions. Voting for: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Wilson. Voting against: Pritzlaff. MOTION CARRIED. 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Vermillion Trail 1 st Addition, Rezoning, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary and Final Plat - Community Development Mr. Jerry Sauber has submitted a plat to create three residential lots on 1.62 acres. The property is located south of CR66 and north of the Tamarack Ridge subdivision. Mr. Sauber is requesting to have the property rezoned from A-I to R-1 and has requested a comp plan amendment from non-designated to low density residential. The property was annexed March 9, 2006. Lot sizes and widths meet the R-l requirements. There is an existing home on lot 3. It is proposed that a central access be constructed for all three lots. The access drive will be 22 ft. wide. Approval is contingent on the following: Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 11 1. The satisfaction of any engineering and planning comments. 2. The preparation and execution of the Development Contract and approval of the construction plans for grading, storm water and utilities by the Engineering Division. The maintenance ofthe private drive would be through a homeowner's association. MOTION by Wilson, second by McKnight adopting RESOLUTION R77-06 approving the preliminary and final plat Vermillion Trail First Addition, RESOLUTION R78-06 amending the 2020 Comprehensive Plan for the Vermillion Trail First Addition located off of County Road 66 and north of Tamarack Ridge subdivision, and ORDINANCE 006-558 rezoning the Vermillion Trail First Addition property from A-I to R-l. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Adopt Resolution - Graeve Serrano Addition Preliminary and Final Plat - Community Development This is a replat oflots 1 and 2 and a portion oflot 9 of block 1 of the townhomes of Nelson Hills Farm. This is part of a severance agreement between the Graeve's and Serrano's to get out of the homeowners association. The homeowners association has agreed to their severance from the organization provided that they replat a portion of their property. Access for these two townhomes is directly off of Euclid Path. There is a drainage and utility easement on lot 9 and they are proposing to acquire this lot also. MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to adopt RESOLUTION R79-06 approving the preliminary and final plat for the Graeve Serrano Addition. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Discuss Chippendale Court Properties - Community Development Chippendale Court is located on the east side ofTH3. There are six parcels of which five properties are in Empire township and one is in the City. Mr. Rick Bugbee has approached the City about annexing into the City in order to obtain City services to solve their septic system problem. Staff would like to look at the entire area to achieve a resolution that would address all the properties. An Empire/Farmington Planning Advisory Committee meeting will be held August 16, 2006 and with Council's consent this will be discussed at that meeting. Mr. Bugbee has talked with his neighbor, Mr. Adelmann, regarding running the sewer line along his north property line. Council agreed this should be discussed at the EFP AC meeting, and staff will contact the township and the property owners to inform them of the situation. Mr. Rick Bugbee stated he spoke with the Planning Commission and Empire Township last month, and they referred him back to the City and Dakota County. He called Dakota County, and has talked with several City staff members. The Township told him it was up to the City and they would follow whatever the City decided to do. Mr. Bugbee stated when he spoke with Mr. Adelman, he was told Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 12 he would give him an easement to go under his property line. The sewer line would be drilled, not trenched. d) Approve Updated AUAR - Seed Property - Community Development The AUAR for the Seed property was originally adopted in 2004. It has been updated due to land use changes and further clarification of transportation issues in the area. Ms. Sherri Buss, Bonestroo, presented the AUAR to Council. The review period for comments is from July 31, 2006 to August 11, 2006. It would be brought back to Council on August 21,2006 for final approval of the update. Council discussed the roundabouts recommended by MnDOT in the AUAR and asked various questions about the AUAR. MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto adopt RESOLUTION R80-06 approving the AUAR update for the Farmington Seed/Genstar Property. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. e) Completion of Improvements Meadow Creek 4th Addition - Engineering There are several improvements in the Meadow Creek 4th Addition that have not been completed by the deadline. Staff is at a stalemate with the developer to get the improvements completed. Staff intends to notify the developer he has 30 days to complete the improvements after which time staff will take action to complete the improvements according to the Development Contract. The improvements not completed include: 1. A pond that has not been excavated on the edge of Meadow Creek 4th Addition and the Riverbend development. 2. There is some grading work in a resident's yard in relation to one ofthe bridges that crosses Lake Julia waterway. 3. Various trails throughout the development are not complete. The developer is Progress Land Company. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to approve enforcing the conditions of the development agreement for Meadow Creek 4th Addition. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. f) Review Revised Special Assessment Notices - Finance Staff has revised the assessment notice to make it easier to understand for residents. Finance Director Roland reviewed the changes. g) Met Council Scheduled Meetings of School District Site - Administration The comprehensive plan amendment for the high school will be reviewed at Met Council meetings on August 7 and August 23,2006. 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 13 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Councilmember McKnight: He thanked everyone involved in the Fire Department Open House. It was well attended. He thanked Police Chief Siebenaler for his work over the many years. His service to the people and the City is very much appreciated by this Council and all the citizens. Councilmember Wilson: Assistant City Engineer Tim Gross did a very nice job of meeting with 10-12 residents regarding the mill and overlay project. These types of projects were added to the CIP in 2005 at an estimated cost of $375,000 per year. It is the goal to do a mill and overlay every year as a preventative measure to do a full reconstruct. One comment Mr. Ristow made was why back to back assessments. Last year Council could have opted to the mill and overlay project, but that would have dovetailed on top of the Ash Street project so it would have been a simultaneous assessment of two different projects. The amount budgeted for this year is $750,000. This project is coming in $285,000 below budget. Back to back assessments are never comfortable for Council to do. He feels very comfortable with the decision he made with respect to the choice to do a mill and overlay which could provide significant benefit for 10-15 years. It is the Council's and City Engineer's decision to determine how long we want a road to go. His decision was do I feel more comfortable with the choice of trying a proven method with the mill and overlay, use less taxpayer resources, preserve a road for a longer period of time or wait until it deteriorates, have to do a complete reconstruct, and then we are looking at thousands of dollars to residents to do that as we are doing in other parts of the City. Mr. Ristow identified a number of roads that are in worse condition. He is absolutely correct. In 2003 when the Pavement Management Study was done, there were 14 roads that met the criteria of being completely reconstructed. The City elected not to do that this year because the sanitary sewer and water through telescoping efforts are in very good quality. So why rip up a road that does not need to be ripped up. Walnut Street by the Kindergarten Center is in terrible shape, but it is also in the CIP to be reconstructed. Why is he voting to do back to back assessments? He interpreted that as why are you sticking it to residents in the same area. That is not his goal. One of the primary functions of the City is to provide high quality police and fire, have good high quality roads to travel and do these and a number of other services in the most efficient manner possible. That is why the mill and overlay is a good investment both for taxpayers and residents in that area. He appreciates that there is concern from residents with back to back assessments. His decision was to go ahead because it is a better way of managing the road as opposed to a much greater cost down the road. He attended the Fire Station open house and thanked Fire Chief Tim Pietsch and the Fire Department and residents who attended. He thanked the Rambling River Days volunteers. Councilmember Pritzlaff: Thanked everyone who participated in the Fire Station open house. Council Minutes (Regular) July 17,2006 Page 14 He thanked the volunteers for Rambling River Days. Council accepted a resignation tonight from Assistant City Engineer Tim Gross and thanked him for his service to the City. He will be a hard employee to replace. He wished him well in his future. He attended the Police Academy and at the beginning of the next meeting he would like to make some comments. Mayor Soderberg understood the academy has been getting rave reVIews. City Attorney Jamnik: One of their prosecuting attorneys will be sworn in as a District Court Judge and will be leaving their firm. City Administrator Herlofsky: Red Wing. Tomorrow Council will leave at 5:00 p.m. to go to At the next meeting staff will bring a joint resolution with Empire Township regarding TH3. Community Development Director Carroll: McDonald's will be starting construction this week. Mayor Soderberg: He has been contacted by the Milan's and the State Representative regarding the speed study for TH3. The section of roadway identified is in Empire Township. He would like staff to contact Empire Township regarding a joint resolution to MnDOT to do a speed study on that segment of roadway to reduce the speed limi t. The Fire Department open house was well attended. The B&B Transformer fire is an excellent example of how good the Fire Department is. He took an early tour ofthe Fire Department and the safety and rescue squad was doing training for rappelling. We have a great Fire Department and rescue squad. The Fairgrounds had a couple of great events - the Scottish Fair and the Highland Games. Tonight there is a circus there. The Fairgrounds is doing a lot of programs that are very exciting. Council received Police Chief Siebenaler's resignation and asked City Administrator Herlofsky to forward to Council the process that will be used to find a replacement. Council received a notice of the open house for the Elm Street project for July 27 at City Hall from 5 p.m. - 7 p.m. This is the first opportunity for residents to express their concerns or ask questions. Dakota County has issued a public health alert due to the heat. Council Minutes (Regular) July 17, 2006 Page 15 He met with the committee on the renaming of the Post Office. Nominations have been narrowed down to three: - Hamilton H. Judson - Grace Knoll Crowell - Clay Family Voting will be done by the public beginning July 20 - 28. Once the results are in a request will be forwarded to Congressman Kline to author legislation to rename the Post Office. 14. ADJOURN MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to adjourn at 9:26 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, ~ /V7~</ Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant 50.00 % Year Complete l/; CITY OF FARMINGTON SUMMARY OF REVENUES JUNE 30,2006 ... .< .< \2006.> ... . BUDGet. . ... CORRI:~t >YTD $ $ $ ... ... ........p......e....~o.E;6N.......r........... .. .~O~5.. ... .......p......e.....2~OPOe.5<N.....T.......... JW .'YTP ........... % % GENERAL FUND Property Taxes 5,298,201 1,997,268 2,005,257 37.85 1,343,383 28.28 Licenses 29,600 806 19,851 67.06 15,468 53.98 Permits 977,156 76,190 447,340 45.78 268,312 24.48 Fines 83,100 6,920 37,292 44.88 24,359 31.19 Intergovernment Revenue 350,000 5,208 79,274 22.65 82,461 26.60 Charges for Service 439,000 34,182 163,343 37.21 141,129 36.56 Investment Interest 225,000 18,750 112,500 50.00 112,500 50.00 Miscellaneous 13,500 1 ,452 4,602 34.09 14,337 143.37 Transfers 347 900 28 992 173 950 50.00 118000 50.00 Total General Fund 7 763 457 2169768 3 043 409 39.20 2 119 949 29.77 SPECIAL REVENUE HRA Operating Fund 20,000 594 105,076 525.38 203,440 992.39 Police Forfeitures Fund 8,000 313 3,381 42.26 1,810 22.48 Park Improvement Fund 296,000 17,936 73,660 24.89 249,294 85.37 Recreation Operating Fund 298,030 57,116 123,782 41.53 155,547 51.59 Ice Arena 252 500 24 277 144,983 57.42 133114 53.78 874530 100 236 450 882 51.56 743 205 164.83 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Liquor Operations 3,803,800 390,390 1,823,099 47.93 1,527,137 41.10 Sewer 1,510,000 203,125 634,502 42.02 604,951 39.44 Solid Waste 1,917,000 178,782 820,170 42.78 788,705 45.12 Storm Water 300,000 63,078 191,609 63.87 188,298 80.13 Water 1 745000 163 309 682819 39.13 760 790 44.88 9275 800 998 684 4152199 44.76 3869881 43.35 Total Revenues 17,913,787 3,268,688 7,646,490 42.68 6,733,035 39.80 CITY OF FARMINGTON SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES JUNE 30, 2006 ..~pRP~'r ~Op~ mEo~~NG \<200$. no .............. . ......... . GENERAL FUND $ % % Legislative 68,350 5,130 41 ,083 60.11 40,282 59.98 Administration 491,929 44,563 196,762 40.00 222,907 48.93 Elections 19,220 1 6 0.00 0.00 Communications 71,211 6,369 30,544 42.89 32,330 45.61 Human Resources 215,228 14,566 92,636 43.04 86,952 44.54 Information Technology 117,716 7,652 58,125 49.38 58,097 53.90 Finance 457,719 35,248 222,459 48.60 214,433 51.84 Planning 178,539 16,170 81,477 45.64 79,139 45.46 Building Inspection 438,673 32,366 185,217 42.22 178,453 43.87 Community Development 180,809 13,160 79,275 43.84 42,309 26.61 Police Administration 643,261 57,980 272,675 42.39 285,062 47.20 Patrol Services 1,656,674 147,430 725,130 43.77 692,209 45.59 Investigation Services 374,145 29,002 176,494 47.17 150,116 54.08 Emergency Management 5,200 36 1,001 19.25 45,953 883.71 Fire 486,648 62,623 181,708 37.34 126,775 29.77 Rescue 44,358 11 ,001 30,973 69.83 21,740 50.43 Engineering 278,815 29,646 151,367 54.29 148,176 52.09 G.I.S. 500 0.00 117 1.19 Streets 510,576 67,910 232,946 45.62 224,441 47.49 Snow Removal 94,263 7,972 78,943 83.75 73,723 71.62 Signal Maint 115,600 19,794 60,531 52.36 43,364 41.06 Natural Resources 76,632 21,641 45,042 58.78 16,400 29.14 Park Maint 443,348 57,776 211,551 47.72 180,921 44.43 Building Maint 150,439 11,568 65,664 43.65 56,817 35.96 Recreation Programs 436,074 47,101 184,101 42.22 176,757 47.05 Transfers Out 207 530 23 118 75,000 36.14 106,500 50.00 Total General Fund 7 763,457 769,823 3480710 44.83 3,303,973 46.40 SPECIAL REVENUE HRA Operating 40,000 2,980 111,931 279.83 11 ,160 26.51 Police Forfeitures Fund 8,000 879 1,638 20.48 3,789 47.07 Park Improvement Fund 415,000 55,563 152,261 36.69 103,098 19.53 Senior Center 158,538 10,863 68,448 43.17 66,433 44.75 Swimming Pool 139,492 20,134 35,287 25.30 60,040 42.12 Ice Arena 329,341 89,621 221,584 67.28 127 496 51.58 1 090,371 180,040 591,149 54.22 372 016 33.33 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Liquor Operations 3,812,398 476,389 2,188,949 57.42 1,497,352 42.04 Sewer 1,505,743 95,812 590,672 39.23 555,435 36.03 Solid Waste 2,030,008 232,677 1,074,137 52.91 799,825 45.17 Storm Water 335,066 28,632 172,892 51.60 132,650 33.09 Water Utility 1,432,823 177,287 682,118 47.61 287,997 25.25 9,116,038 1,010,797 4,708,768 51.65 3,273,259 38.90 Total Ex enditures 17,969,866 1,960,660 8,780,627 48.86 6,949,248 41.73 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7e., TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator .~ / j) FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Acknowledge Retirement - Police Department DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION The City received notice that Mr. Daniel Siebenaler is retiring from his position as Police Chief. DISCUSSION The Human Resources Office received notification that Mr. Daniel Siebenaler will retire on August 11, 2006 from his position as Police Chief. Mr. Siebenaler joined the City on February 14, 1979 and was promoted to Police Chief on October 3, 1988. He has been an excellent, respected and valued member of the City Organization. The City has appreciated his commitment to the organization and wishes him well in his future endeavors. ACTION REQUESTED Acknowledge the retirement of Mr. Daniel Siebenaler, effective August 11, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, xi J /J(/i (1' /( ; ::~~~end;::~;'~~ Human Resources Director cc: Personnel file City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7e1 TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator,/~ Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director /' '/ FROM: SUBJECT: Appointment Recommendation - Parks & Recreation DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of a full-time Park Keeper to fill a vacant position in the Parks & Recreation Department has been completed. DISCUSSION After a thorough review by the Parks & Recreation Department and the Human Resources Office, a contingent offer of employment has been made to Ted Novak, subject to ratification by the City Council. Mr. Novak has several years of experience in grounds keeping, equipment maintenance and snow removal. He has worked in the Park Maintenance Department of the City of Bumsville and most recently in the Public Works Department of the City of New Prague. Mr. Novak meets the qualifications for this position. BUDGET IMPACT Funding for this position is authorized in the 2006 budget. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the appointment of Mr. Ted Novak as a Park Keeper in the Parks & Recreation Department effective on August 15,2006. Respectfully submitted, .-;/I'," "- ,,1//";/: )~ C /./c- <l:/",~ /./ (- Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Director cc: file 7~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator r FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Acknowledge Resignation - Finance DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION The City has received notification from Timothy LaBeau of his resignation as a part-time Liquor Clerk. DISCUSSION Mr. LaBeau has been employed in a part-time capacity with the City since April 28, 2005. His resignation was effective July 28,2006. He has been an excellent employee and the City appreciates his commitment to the organization and wishes him well in his future endeavors. ACTION REQUESTED Acknowledge the resignation ofMr. Timothy LaBeau effective Friday, July 28, 2006. Respectfully submitted, ./1/ d ;:i' -A/ f / j ,d j~~~~/t?~t;v~ c..- / Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Director cc: file City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councihnembers, City Administrator@ FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - Appointing Election Judges - Primary Election DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION The Primary Election is Tuesday, September 12, 2006. Per State Statute 204B.21, subd. 2, election judges must be appointed at least 25 days before that election. DISCUSSION The attached resolution appoints judges for all Precincts 1 through 6 for the 2006 Primary Election. BUDGET IMPACT Election costs are included in the 2006 budget. ACTION REQUIRED Adopt the attached resolution appointing election judges for the Primary Election on September 12,2006. Respectfully submitted, ~~. d AC(~ Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director 7f RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING LIST OF ELECTION JUDGES AND DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES FOR PRIMARY ELECTION OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City the ih day of August, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members present: Members absent: Member resolution: introduced and Member seconded the following NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following list of election judges be approved for the Primary Election to be held September 12,2006. Precinct 1 Mary J 0 Bell Pat White Marlene Beeney Kimberly Lomas Barbara Legare Marcianne Rotty Tom Herme Florence Mohn Precinct 2 Gretchen Bergman Pat Thurmes Mama Halvorson Karen Pietsch Lauretta Schneider Darlene Grabowski Precinct 3 Dennis Sullivan Hardai Prasad Maren Rasmussen Brenda Ellis-Reedy Erwin Hagen Doris Dahl Lynn Nordine Rosemary Benz Precinct 4 Helen Hagen Betty Wanberg Joyce Blowers Evan Brewer Patrick Hansen Larry Hempler Sarah Miller Erik Starkman Precinct 5 Jeanne Stanek Kathleen Tverberg Leroy Benz Joanne Weber Cassandra Parker Kyle Thompson Precinct 6 Nancy Bjerke Robert Christensen Charles Weber Lois Lotze Todd Carey Josephine Stannard Jennifer Gale BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the address of the polling place for Precincts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 shall be as follows: Precinct 1 - Rambling River Center - 431 Third Street Precinct 2 - Kindergarten Center - 51 0 Walnut Street Precinct 3 - Meadowview Elementary School- 6100 195th Street West Precinct 4 - Akin Road Elementary School - 5231 195th Street West Precinct 5 - Bible Baptist Church, 19700 Akin Road Precinct 6 - Middle School West, 4200 20Sth Street West This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 7th day of August, 2006. Mayor Attested to the _day of ,2006. City Administrator SEAL ~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administra~ Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: SUBJECT: Capital Outlay - Parks DATE: August 7, 2006 ACTION REQUESTED No action is requested. This is for informational purposes only. DISCUSSION The approved Meadow Creek Third Addition Park Master Plan identified the installation of a concrete border around the playground equipment that has previously been installed. The approved Meadowview Park and Silver Spring Park Master Plans identified the removal of weeds and re-vegetating the sloped areas in each park with native grasses and wild flowers. BUDGET IMPACT All three of these improvements were identified previously in the Park Improvement Fund's Capital Improvement Plan for completion. Attached is a Park Improvement Fund Balance Sheet. All of these improvements will be covered under the 2006 approved budget amount of $415,000. The following identifies the costs of each park improvement: Difference Park Improvement Estimate Quote (Quote-Est) Meadowview Weed removal native grasses $10,000 $14,850 $4,850 and wildflower plantings Silver Springs Park Weed removal native grasses $4,440 $5,590 $1,150 and wildflower plantings Meadow Creek Third Addition Concrete playground border $8,625 $6280 ($2,345) Total $23,065 $26,720 $3,655 ~yw Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director NO L!) I"- T""~ T"" '<t o ("II NO L!) l"- ON T"" C") o ("II ..... ..... = M I \0 = = M rLJ ~ rLJ C ~ Q. ~ ~ "C C ~ rLJ ~ = c ~ > ~ ~ "C ~ ...... ~ ~ '- Q l. ~ "C C = ~ ...... c ~ S ~ > Q l. Q. S - ~ l. ~ ~ NO L!) N Q)"- O~ o ("II NO L!) N coL!) o~ o ("II NO L!) N I''<t O~ o ("II NO L!) N (gOO O~ o ("II CI) U a.. ~ o en C) s::: "C s::: ~ LL "C CI) - CIS E Q) t.) e ~ >, co t.) co e -0 Q) e 0) :J 15<( l.L Q)e g'>,oa; 'c ~ -g 2 ~ .!:: -l -0 2 1I)~~i52 WCOf-CO(j) 000000000 00000 00000 o 0 0 0 - NCO..-L!) a a a a o a a 0000000 00000 00000 ----- OOL!)O L!)co..-L!) N U) ..... o<:f co U) N U) ..... r-: c>> "'t_ ..... N U) N .....- c>> c>> ..... N U) N N N c>> o<:f N U) N c5 co co N U) N a) o::r o ..... ..J ~ l- e I- II) CI) II) s::: CI) c. >< W - U Q,) ..... o a.. a.. "C CI) - CIS E ~-o II) e W~ 000000 000 000 o co- L{) I"- '<t 000000 000 L!) l{) a I"-..-L!) ..- C") a 000000 000 L!)OO OlOO co <D 000000 000 000 0..0"": N <D '<t 000000 000 000 o l{) l{) ..-l{)N l{) 000000 000 000 OL!)O C")NCO C") ~(j) 0)0 .....u co e ..c 0 U+:; -0 t.) e 2 co(j) (/) e Q) 0 .S2 U 2:-0 (/) Q) Q) .9:1 (j) co o..QjE g-:s~ (j)OW c Q) E .9- Q) :J..c 0- ~ wO o o 0_ ..... c>> o::r N U) .....- M c>> ~ ~ O'j ...... r:::: -0 ~ co e: o ..- 00 a o a a l{) 0000000 000000 000000 ui' lO- 0 lO- 0 ..-- NN<DNO o o o o::r- U) q ..... N U) .....- M o::r o::r 000 o a 000000 000000 000000 L{) ..0 0 ..0 0 - NNCONO ..- o o U) U)- ..... CD ..... N U) .....- ..... N M ..- N '<t ..t 000 000000 000000 000000 ..00000 - NL!)CO"-O o o o cD M CD o<:f N U) N ..... CD N 000000000 00000 00000 ----- o a a 0 '<tco..-o ..- Ul e o +:; :J .0 .;:: CC Q) 0 E t.) 0..- o t.) (j)~ > e Q) 0 o t.) ro Q) 3: g' '0 ..... Q) Q) ._ Q) 2 l.L Z -oe o..(/)~ (j)e~E~ i5~E,g~ ~ g' +:; f- 0.. :J ~ :J .- co Q) .2 Q) 0 o -g .S2 0 >w ~ we U:J-O- col.LQ)(j)wc~ ~ 0..... 0 " Q) oc~o~..ct.) ~~ro5-ro~(/) Oc..?0-~O-U2 (/) c w E (/) (/) Q) (/) (/) <( o o o c5 c>> U) N U) N I() CD N o o o I() ..... "'t N U) N o<:f M CD ..J ~ l- e I- -0 e :J l.L C Q) E Q) > o .... 0.. E ~ .... co 0- e Q) <.) e ~ co co 0) e e co E Q) 0::: -0 Q) co E ~ w ~ ... nl c.. >- .Q (1) ~ "C (1) .c (.) f/) - t: (1) E (1) > o ... Q. E - ~ ... nl c.. '0 "01: fl)Q)~ iii'E~c.o o Q) ~ ~ 0 (.)EC.Q)o "0 Q) c.... Q) > CIS ~ LO <<iooE~ EC.I:..ll:6'7 ;EJ:~ fI) ~ CIS W ~c. ..ll: ~ fI) CIS E C. Q)"O ~~lij c~Q. Q)c.~ E E Q) Q) 0 iii ro > (.) CIS ..a 2'5E1D c. 0 ~ EJ: 00 ... ro 'i ..a "0 Q) ... () Q) ...... o ~ D.. g I: c:: 0 .5::! t5 ':5 t:: ~ :J 0 8 U "0 c:: ~ 5 00 ..... 00- ~"E Ol~ Q) .S: 0. E cuio. 'co ro Ol :J .b c...~ g "':-Q)~ Q) Q) .- ~.bE ~ .2 o ... fI) ... ... :gQ)0l~ () 1i> .S E "0 c...S Q) Q) E CIS > <<i 0 E 2 E () ~ 0. ~ E w Q)..ll: ... ~ ~ o Q) CIS I:~c. fI) Q) I: ......J:CIS ~.E-;;~ E "0 .- Q) Q)Q)"O... >1i>Q)~ 2c..~E c. E - E 0 c. () g. ... 1:... :::I I: o Q) E c. <C fI) "O..ll: fI) Q) :v 'EfI)c.1: Q)~"O~ E"OQ)C. Q) Q) > ~ >...OQ) OQ)~'" ~-c.c.fI) c. c.CIS E E CIS E o I: () 0 fI) ... I: Q)"O ~EQ)I"- ClSQ)I:O Q) > lij 0 >-2c..N C. E "0 I: Q) 0 c.~ ......oc. CIS...(jj~ E fI) > ~ ; 0 Q) fI) fI) () "0 CIS W E ~ Q) "0 ... Q) ~_c.tO iii ..2 0 ::c..~~ CIS Q) Q) "0 >- ~ "0 Q) Q) iii ~ ~ ..... ~ClSI: Q)'-'''-' ~ E ~ U ~ g C...ll:C.eroN c.~ o...ii) <C[ fI) ~ '<;f' () '<;f' <C >- Q) c E :J 00 CIS 0 Q) z 0 ro ..ll: ro ii) ~OLlJ CIS ~ D.. ro o o o o o LO .,..- 6'7 ..... "0 2 .!!2 c:: 'Q) jg252~ 'w o,'w U ui Oi >- ~ 'c Ol c:: ~ c:: U .S: '6. 0. Q) '6. crouiEui ~ ~ .~ .9- Ol o."O~:Jc:: c:: c:: rr'- m~Q)Q)~ .l:; E E ro :J - 00 o o N to o o N 00 c:: ~"OtO u20 0.....0 .....roN o...ii) to 0) .,..- o c:: :::.::: >- 00 ro o o o o o o C"') 6'7 - ~ (/)+-'~c:nCf) Q) -Q)I:..... .3 ~ 2 'g ~ 0...... roQ) ro "S.........a_0' ~Oicroro ~ .~.~ 2 ~ .......:s:uQ)'6"O 00......."0"0 ro-g~roro ~ Ol"O c:: c:: .......Q) '0 ro c:: Q) c 'w 2 Ol 0 Oi_ro:;:: c:: 00 c:: ro :;:: .~ .2>.2> .c. ."'!:::: en t: g>a3~ E ro ro 0. to o o N L() o o C\J 00 Q) >- L() I"- ei 2 ~ >- ro~ S ro .......0.... o Q. Q) o o o o LO I"- .,..- 6'7 "E 32 .~ Q) '1ij Q) _'co E.....~ooo.. .9- :. ro ~ ~ C::o :JQ)..a..c:3 rr....... _ ,^ Q) 'Q) c:: .~ 8 ~ "0 ..c: .Q E 0 C(/)"t)::)-(j) :Ju:J-jgQ) e .c z ~ CD '- OlU 00 00 ~'6. 6 7;i D.. U jg 00 o o N o o o LO 6'7 I"- o o C\J o Z C"') '<;f' 00 ~"'O:::;- ro c:: c:: 0....~Q) E "0 3: Q. c:: Q) 0 oE "5 Q) ro ~ ~ o&,o - o o LO C"') I"- 0) 6'7 ......."0"0 ..... c:: c:: :J ro :J o Q. 0 U x ..... Q)~Q) ~ ~ 0.0 OO..c: -..c: Om ~..a c:: ~ ..... ro Q. .2t "':-:J Q) 0 :!:: U Q)= ..c: ro OO..a .5::! 1D c:: ~ U 00 '6. jg ...:- ,m-gc Q) :J Q) ..c: 0 E 00 ..... Q. .5::! ~'3 c::rorr .5::! D.. Q) Q. I"- o o N LO o o C\J 00 Q) >- LO '<;f' o c:: :::.::: c:: Q) ~ 2' Q) > LlJ "0 Q) > ro Ol o.c:: c::E o .2> u- 2.!!2 ii) ro C::.l:; o U Q) ..... o o o LO I"- 6'7 <0 ~ "'- "'- r:::: C) '=' ~ co @ () U t- "0 c:: :J ~.~ 8 ~ C5,=roC >- ro ..a Q) ro E ....... E D.. 00 ~ ro co -E ~ ..m c:: Q) ..a 00 2 E ...:- .- Q. Q) .- "0 '_ ....... ro "O:J'Q).l:; ro rr ..c: Q) 00 .,..- .,..- o N o o LO '<;f' 6'7 o ..- o N o Z '<;f' N .!!2 I ro l.L '0 '01: tIlO).!!! jjjc~Q. 00)'" ... uEQ.O) '00)0.- 0) > l'll tIl - 0 0 l'llE l'll ... I: ~EJ:~ tIl :!:: l'll W 3:0. ~ ... tIl l'll E 0. 0) '0 ... 'O:!::~iU ~c.s!a. uO)Q.... ,~ E E 0) 00)0- ... > u ~ Q.e'5E 0.0 .~ = '[i o - - :g 0) Cl U Q) ,!: '0 a. ,!: ~ g E E U ~ :;; tIl W tIl - I: 0) a E a 0) a > ~ o ..- c..~ E .:.:: ~ ca c.. >- .c Q) ~ "C Q) .s:: u en - s::::: Q) E Q) > o ~ c. E -0 _O)~ -oc""-w O~l'll 5~~~ ~~;; ~~~2 I: :::::I_a. >-_ 0 C 0) .Q I: ... ~ CIl 0 'iij E'O 0) o.o.-oc ~,*-g~ g?~g.2 e a. ~ E .Q E .... .... Q.E'" :;=;0.~2 E 0. '-' .- CIl CIl 80. -g5-a.~ l'll Q) c:.....o :::::I I: I"- o 0) C") EQ.a <(tIl~ 'O~ tIl 0) :u ctllQ.I: O)~'O.!!! E'OO)Q. 0) 0) > ... >_00) o 0) ... - ... -;::: 0. tIl ,.. .... 0. l'll .... E l'll E E 0 I: U 0 .:.:: ~ ca c.. tIl - I: 0)'0 ... E 0) l'll 0) I: 0) > I: >- 0 l'll c..a. E '0 I: 0) 0 Q...!!! -_00. l'll_Ci)... E tIl > 0) :;;OO)jjj tIl U '0 l'll W E ... 0) '0 ~I:~L!) E l'll .2 a ...a.~~ l'll 0) 0) '0 >- ... '0 0) O)jjj O>l'lll: 00 ... E l'll Q) Q.~a.>- 0.... <( [ tIl 0) ~ C") <( 0) -= E CIl l'll 0. Z ~ ~ 0 l'll = Q. I C Q) -0 .... CIl Cl +-' 2 wo '- t-"en -: ~ '- ~:J - 'iij CIl 2 o8~ui'';:'~Q) .Ql ~ ~ ~ E ~ 00 'c :9 'Vi .~ ro ~Q)OO -0.0. roE~g'-o o.CIlO:;:;C ~ OJ::J Q) CIl .Ql e C CIl = .2~ _ ..0 .... - Q) Q) ~ ~ Q) 00 J: CIl 00..0 N ..- a N a a a L!) ~ ..- ..- a N o z C") ~ Q) 1:: - .- :r: a a a a a ..- ~ .......2 :m 'Vi Q)- ..c .... 00 ~ .~ 0 c= o CIl 'i5. B ~~ ~ ~ ...... ..0 -0-0 C C CIl :J ~ e Q) ~- -ornc ....-Q) CIl 0. E 0: oi.& 00 C :J 0)'- 0- .~ g- Q) ..c 0 00 00 .- "C E C :J CIl - - a a a L!) CX) ..- ~ -0 .~ C 00 Q)C:JCIlg' ~ ~ -, 'C .....'-Q.)(j)~ ....- 0) ~ Q) .- Q) >- CIl -oQ) E ~~-l~.2 Q)o. ..... ~ooc"~~ .~ g' ~ 2: 00 C:;:;o.Q)Q) .~ ~ 'S ro .g> 0. _ 0- > 'C o.Q)>..o Q) a a N a a a I"- ~ CX) a a N o z Q) CD N ~ .... CIl 0. ro :J -, Q) ~ CIl -l a a a a L!) C") ~ 00 ~ CIl ~ -0 .... CIl o ..0 CX) l"- N CD N ..- ~ _ Q)ro.f!! :s t- 'V5 E ~ 8~ui'.E-oQ)c ~ U C C (]) 'C ._2 CIl - Ol.- > CIl ..c ro'Vi - CIl c.. ~ .......~-= ~ ~-o.8 Q)~CIl:;:;-oCOO ~ooo.CWCll~ ~~~~~ CCIl..o I"- a a N ~ a a N 00 Q) >- C") C") ~ ~ .~ >~ ~ .... o CIl -00. CIl Q) ~ ~ !::2 ..... ..... ;::::: o "0 .P- co ~ () a a a a N ~ C Ot'OlOl :g ::J C C o8~:E en ="i:: ,2> Q)CIl-O- ""..0 _-0 Q)>-OOC .;:: ~ g, CIl CIl 0 .- C .... > 00 'iij o.-o~- -c""c 00 CIl CIl :J ~ 00 o..e .;:, .~ J!!......, C ~ :s -0 .~ - 0 C 0.-0 U :J__~_ e C CIl ro 0) Q) 0...0 >- E (j) ~ 0. .........l<: o.'S 2 ~ 0- W ..0 Q)..c 00 I"- a a N -0 C CIl CD a a N L!) a a N 00 Q) >- CD CX) C") ~ C ~ 0 l.....;E ()-o~ ~-o.... o<(~ -0-0 co .~ Q)..c ~f- '0 'Cc: 1/1 CI) ..!!! 'Ujc~o. o CI) ... ... ()Eo.CI) '0 CI) 0.- CI) > CO 1/1 -oocoE CO ... c: :s~.c:~ I/) =: CO w 3:0. ,:,e. ... 1/1 CO E 0. CI)'C 'C=:~~ ~c~Q. () CI) 0. ... CI) E E CI) '0' CI) 0- ... > () ~ D..e'5E 0.0 E; 'j o - - 1/1 CI) Cl 8 Qj .= '0 Q..= CI) E CO 1U 0 E E () 2:! :;:; 1/1 W ~ ~ ca a. >- .a oS! ~ "0 CI) .c (.) en - c CI) E CI) > o ~ c. E CI),:,e. - ... ... o CI) CO c: 3: 0. 1/1 CI) c: --.c:CO ~.5~Q. E '0 .- ~ Cl)CI)'C- > Qj CI) ~ eQ.~E o.E'" E 0 0. () g. - ..- c: _ """ :;, c: 0 o CI) Eo.co <(I/I~ 1/1 - c: 0 CI) 0 E 0 CI) LO > I'-- e """ 0. (A .s c.. o iil ..I<: U ro .0 = .~ '0 (j) ~ ro .0 (]) ..I<: .~ Q) vi ~ ro C .~ -g '- (]) :;::; :;: 0 ._ c.. :;, g :e ~ "E ~ rooeocc..ro'- .....'- u(])'-o.....O :;:0> E(]).olll ro....._1U':eroc _ill 550..:;:~~g>~ :E n en c en .Q :E :~ :g:;'2(])'--0>0>~ ro'-(j)E(])c=c.. ~ ~ 's ~ ~ ~-g o 0-.0 c.. 0> ro u (]) 'Vi 'C,:,e. 1/1 CI):U "0 c~o.c: ffi CI).o'C..!!! ~ E '0 CI) 0. .!!1 .Q> CI) >... ro III > ~ e ~ .l:;..I<: OCl)o.l/I"O'- "'0. Q. 0. CO (]) ro EcoE ~c.. ~oc: c.. () 0 ~ ~ ca a. 1/1 - c: CI)'C ... E CI) en CO CI) c: 0 CI) > c: 0 >-OCON c.Q. E '0 c: CI) 0 o...!!! -_00. co_Cii", E 1/1 > CI) :;:;OCl)'Uj 1/1 ()'C CO W E ... CI) '0 'Uj CI) CO c: 0. LO Eco.2o ...Q.~~ CO CI) CI) 'C >- ... '0 CI) CI)'Uj ~ CO ... E ~~ <( [ c: III CO (]) Q.>- ID """ ... () ..- <( """ CI) ~ E ~ ~ 0 ~ ,:,e. ~ cf. ... "0 CO :Q D.. 2 o o o o o LO ..- (A C -"0 _ ro 0 ~ c III .0 '(ii (])::J ro 0> <:=lIl.....o(])BC O(])(j),-~(]).!: ~ ~ .~_ ~~.o~'~ "0 u c.. (]) .2 ro~5l1lEui'(]) "0 x '0.. E .9- g> ~ (j)~"O-g5-:;::; - i.i=Q.cl....Q.)ct:: Ll(Ecocn ~6 """8iil~ c..u en o o N co o o N III C lIl"Oco g~g 0..'- ro N iil "O,+-(])c cO.o ro 0> o>cO c.- -.. ~-g-c ]i (]) ro 0.. "0 c.. III :;: o "0 CIl (]) 2 u ~ >. 2 "0 ~ 2 ::J (])..... 0...2 E (]) 0= u o o o o o (") (") (A =uCll>. ::J'- B (]) OC(])i} >..~ ..I<: 0 """ ':~.!: ui'lIl.oO .!!1"O32 -0 '(\1 (j) .~ ~ "0 .bi.i=~ ~"5 (j)ro.....o u .0 III U (]) '- Olll~ III CIl (]) LO.o.!: III = 0> CIl ~ .!:; ..I<: .ooECii ~'(ii ro c.. (5m~2 > u :;: ro "0 5 lIl-t5 ffi u_ E III III 0 3l J1 te::J '-..I<:::J.....O ::J .~ 8 115 ..r:::. 8 '- 00 o o N o o o o ..- (A 00 o o N o Z c (]) >. E'g c.. .Q ~ (]) ::J ~ U o >..!: (]) "0 ro~~ ~ 0> ::J (]) (]) .- .!:; a. "O(]) (:) .0 E (j) (])(])cro,g~>' .ogc..l<: (]) O~ro (j) u c.. c.. "0 ~c "O:e(]) c c E ..I<: ~::Jc..,- :;:E.QCIl (])E~o.. z 0 (]) 00 o o o LO I'-- (A (Q ~ .... .... ;::::: <::> "b .B:l CIl ~ o "0 (]) C (]) :;, (]) .l:;0..... ;;.,'(ii III .......>: _0> :m CIl c .!:; (])o..(]).!: .!: - E .!!! III III c.. C .~ g>'s .2 c :;::; 0- u c (]) . c.. ro 0.. en o o N o o o LO (A 00 o o N o Z I'-- (") (5 c ~ (]) c 0.. ~ ... ca ll. >. .c CI) ~ "C CI) .c (.) en - c CI) E CI) > o ... Q. E ~ ... ca ll. '0 "C l: 1Il0)..!!! iii'E~Q. 00)... ... 0 uE~.so ~ ~ III l<< ~ 1ijOOElC) C. I:: W. E ~.ll: :;:E~la .n ~Q. "C 0) ... U 0) '[ a. .ll: ... III III E 0. O)"C I:: C ~ .s III 0 (/) C:~Q.t5(J) 0) 0.... 2:g E E 0) U; (J) 0) 0 ... >ul<< BE e~E uCO 0. 0 ~ E~ ,- ... 'i .~ (/) co .::. o ... III ... ... III 0) C) I:: 8 Q) .= E "C Q. ,= 0) ~ g E ~ ECJ~Q. :;: E III W CIl.ll: ... ... ... o 0) III I:: ~ 0. III 0) I:: ......~Ill 1::"g:::Q. 0) ...... E "C .- 0) 0)0)"C'" >... 0) III o 0) > III Q,o..eE .Ego. u g. ... 1::... ~ I:: o 0) E 0. <c III "C.ll: III 0) la 'E l<< 0. I:: O).o"C..!!! E "C 0) 0. 0) 0) > ... >...00) 00)...... "'-Q.Q.IIl 0. 0. III E III E E 0 I:: U 0 III ... I:: CIl"C ... E 0) 0 III 0) I:: ..- 0) > I:: 0 >- 0 III N c.Q. E "C l: 0) 0 Q.-ao 1ij"'0 0 EiiiQ)~o :;:O~"'I"- lIlu"Cl<<w. W E ... 0) "C ... 0) Ill.... 0.0') llliU..2o E_O)o ...Q.>N III 0) 0) "C >- ... "C 0) O)iii ~ III I:: ... E..!!! ZO 0. 0. Q.~ <c [ :g "<t ... lC) U 0') <t >> co 0) ~ E (J) III m z S .ll: ... (J) 8:. 'C ~ 0... o o o o lC) w. "0 2 ~ '00 e ....- ~c 2 co (J) --E ~c.c. (/) (/) ~ (J) 0- .~ :E (J) [5 I:: '5.. (J) E co ..- ..- o N o o lC) lC) w. o ..- o N o Z "<t ,::.::. .... co 0... ~ (J) .:; (J) 'C ~ 0... o o o o o o ..- w. "0 _ ..... (J) ~ E ~ ~ "-= e - g .f: 8 ~ Ol'm .... c = ~'::'U;~COC(/) \U Q) \U :;:::; 0> Q. ..... .... Q. B ~.f: C - (J) (J) =.J:: ....- (J) C (J) .ll: _ (/) 2E.Q....l{l....c Q3 .9- t) --.0 5 .... .J::~~Ol -u.2 (/)O"":::;CO>(j) .~ (J) ~ 32 oS 'c ~ 0 'S.J:: C .:::: u .0 Ol (J) Q. :'=""'" o ..- o N o o o ex) w. ex) o o N o Z CD N ex) .... (J) .~ 0:: Ol-= C co ::00... E C\J 0:: o o lC) lC) w. I"- o o N o Z o o o o lC) (V) w. -E (J) - E B c. .- 'S t) o-~ (J)'::' (/) "0 C C 0 ~ u o- m'm >>,l::; C\J Q. -gg _"02 Ol co "0 (J) Ol Q3 '00 cQ)~_~Ci.t= ~(/'J- :';:::;',-t -;~o(/).J::(J)~ .0 0 . - ,::.::. .2> u 0 .J:: (j) .f: - u u E g>~ ~~~~ g 'E ~ ~ .!: -0 :8 .::..... ucQ3(J) (/) co .~ 0 co ~ ~ ~~ [5.J::Q.ro C\J ~ '5.. .0 .0 ex) o o N "0_ .9~ coo COOl "ON Olc-=2 oS'6~g~ +-' Q) '~::::J co (J) 0 u 0:: "0 C. U o c -g (J) (J)E,::.::. .0 c. .... .... 0 co (J)Q30... .~ > 0:: (J) o <0 ~ -- -- r:::: o 't Q co ~ o (/) Cl C .J:: (/) C .... ~ - .lII: ... C'G a.. >. ,Q ~ :::::I "C CI) .t: CJ en - t: CI) E CI) > o ... c. E .lII: ... C'G a.. '0 '0 s:: 1IlQ)..!!! (;)'E~Q. o Q) ... ... oE&:,S -g~nsgj 1;ege :E~.s~ ~ ,- 'i 0. ..If:: ... III ns E 0. Q) '0 s:: 'O~'sns 's'E~Q. OQ)o.... Q) E E Q) '0' Q) 0 (;) ... > 0 ns c..e'5E 0.0 .~ .s 'i o - - ~Q)Cl o Qj ,!: '0 Q. ,!: Q) E ns 1; 0 E E 0 ~ +: III w Q)..lf:: - ... ... o Q) ns s:: ~ 0. III _ Q) -:::lJ:: ;.0- E'O Q),S >~ e Q. Q.E E 0 o s:: '0 Q) > o ... Q. Q. ns - 0 s:: - 0 :::l s:: C") o Q) EQ.~ <tlll~ 'O..lf:: III Q) ; 'E III Q. s:: Q)~'Ons E'OQ)Q. Q) Q) > ... >_OQ) o ~ c.. (;) "'Q.Q.ns Q.EnsE E 0 s:: o 0 III - s:: Q)'O ... E Q) ns Q) s:: Q) > s:: >- 0 ns c..Q. E '0 s:: Q) 0 c...!!! -_00. ns_(j)... E III > Q) +:0Q)(;) III 0'0 ns W E ... Q) '0 ~s::8.L!) EnsEo ...Q.~~ ns Q) Q) '0 >- ... '0 Q) Q)(;) ~ ns ... E &:~ <t [ III - s:: Q) E ~ 0 o ... 0. ,~ s:: ..!!! 0. (]) ... C Q) 0 (;) Z ns E 6i..lf:: vi Ci3 C '- (]) ..: '0 ~:-e (]) ro 2 "0 C C .;:: ~ (i) 5 2 vi (]) 'm C C ..co ..gE,-l'Il(]) en o,c '- co o..~"E .S2 >. (]) ..c (]) 00 0> l'Il C ~ E 00_ 'V5 ~ .~ 0> .~ 0..9- ~ C ~ C ::l (]) 0> l'Il af ~'en c.. s:: 00 ns (]) Q.>- III ~ '<t o 0 <t 00 Q) 0> E C ns .~~ Z (/) ro ..If:: '- Q.. ... Q) 8: ~ o (]) C o Z o o O'l I'- ..- ..- ~ - ..... rJ)'-";- . Q)::l '- $ "0 Q) 0 ::l (i)5~.~8 ~ec.2~~ o>(]) ..o.....~ o >'E"O(j) 'c ~ 0. (i) .~ U 0.'- .- ~ '0. ::l ~ ~ afE.o '<t o o N 00 Q) >- L!) '<t ~ '- l'Il Q.. ~ U ~ l'Il E l'Il f- o o o L!) C") ~ c- = Q) l'Il E E 0.00 ::lvio O-Q).o Q) :;:: (]) .- N "0 C l'Il C Q) ~ ::l E ..n e l'Il O>Q) >. ..... l'Il .- _ 00 0. o ..- o N o o L!) L!) ~ O'l o o N o z "": o I >. o L- f- ~ ~ .,.... .,.... i::::: o '0 Q) Ci5 E:? o o '<t ..- CD CD C") ~ ro C l'Il C o~o ~ O):-E L-c"O o .- "0 00 (;j~l'IlQ) Q) ..c ~ Q) '-"'Oroz .~ ~ ~ .~ l'Il "0 ~o.ro o.co ::l.o '<t o o CO C") ..- ~ g> ~ :.0 u 'm E 'c ~ ~ ~ _u"Oo>Q) u '0. ~ 'en ~ l'Il ~ l'Il o.'-L- l'Il Q) L-' 0. > 2 l'Il ~ (i) ..c 00 "0 C ::l o rn c- w- >'(])"O ~E:; 0.0.0 'S .0 0- Q) L!) o o N 00 Q) >- CO '<t Q) > e o c~ g& .- E L- (]) > ~ ~ ns a.. >- .J:2 ~ ~ 'C CI) ~ (.) fI) - t:: CI) E CI) > o ~ Q. E ~ ~ ns a.. - o 'C I: _ III >Q) Cll 1Il- o c: 0 c. (.) Q) ... ... 0 'CEliQ)o Q)~CllUio- ftieOECllg Ec.1: U') ;:;E~~Ef) III ._ :=: :u w ~c. ~ ... III Cll E C. Q)'C 'C:=:Q)I: 2c:~.!!! (.)Q)'Q.c. '5- E E ~ ... Q) 0 - c.. > (.) III e - ECll c.:;:' E,g .- - .~ o - _ III III - 0Q)0l1: (.) - I: Q) 'C ~ 'c E Q) c..- Q) _ E Cll > Cll 0 E 0 .~ (.) ~ c.. Ui E w .- -Q)~ o ... ... I: Q) Cll ~ C. J1-Q)1: I: :;:, ~ Cll Q).o-'Q. E 'C .: ... Q)2'C2 > Q) Q) III 0- > Cll ... c. 0 E c. E ... ,Eoli (.) Cll - 1:_ :;:, I: o Q) E c. <( III 'C~ J1 Q) :u 1::Qc.1: Q).o'CCll E'CQ)'Q. Q) Q) > ... >_OQ) o Q) ... - ... _ C. III c.c.c.Cll E E Cll E - 0 I: (.) 0 III - I: Q)'C ... E Q) Cll Q) I: ('i) Q) > I: ..-- ~ 0 Cll 0 c.. 'Q. N .~ 'C I: 2 0 c..!!! 0 Cll_OC.O EUiQj"'o ;:;0>26 8l(.)~:Q(i} E ... 2 'C III Q) Cll I: C. N E Cll 0 ..-- ...'Q.Qjo Cll > N Q) Q) ~ 'C ... 'C Q) Q)- > :Q I: e E Cll 0 c..ll:c..z c.... <( Cll C. 1Il-.....- -c 0) 0) I: .~ ~ >.::l c~roeO) rol/)3:O)~ a.o~ >.l/) l/) ._ ...... ro 0) O)c~a."""-c 0) .~..... 1:.- ,;:.o..ccO)""5i _ _'_ 0 E .- 5 E 2 t5 .9- E :;::;8325-.2 ~.:::;J2(j)Q) 'i:: l(l C .= '- 0 o -c _ .00) C co' IIlro o-c~ ~ 0)g>......2::l (.) .~ '6 ~ 0) :J <(:::::O)roa.- .!llO)o..EO) o...-c1!oE ...... 0 Q) E Cll z ~ ... Cll c.. ..... 0) C .::: 3: O:::~O) C ..... oO)ro = C ::l = 'w 0" El/)(f) ..... 0 0) ..... >0 o o o 6 o ..-- Ef) -c 0) C ~50)= '-~co 1...._ 0) en l:; C J~L~ c- l/)- ~ 1! a.. 0) g> ::l l/)uiE:.c';:' o 0).9- l/) l/) ._ C ::l'- C 5:;::;O"E8 '5.. ~ Q) .2 a. l'- o o N CD o o N l/) C l/) .- O)-cCD (0)0 otO .....roN 0......... l/) ex:> 3: .~ > (iJ Q) s o o o o ('II Q() ,.: iR- <0 ~ ...... ...... ~ ( ..J ~ e I- ~ co ~ o o ~ CD cti en ~ N iR- ..J ct l- e I- M en Q() o Q() II) iR- ..J ~ e I- o o o cti '" iR- ..J ~ e I- 7A City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, Minnesota 55024 (651) 463-7111 . (651) 463-2359 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, counci.lm. embers and City Administrator!..!\) If Lena Larson ~ ' Public Works Administrative Assistant FROM: SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation for Pollution Prevention Day - Parks and Recreation Department DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION A donation for Pollution Prevention Day has been received from Dakota Electric Association. DISCUSSION Dakota Electric Association has once again agreed to sponsor Pollution Prevention Day with a generous donation of $1000. In addition to the donation, they will be participating by providing a presenter. The event will be held in Rambling River Park on Friday, September 15,2006. Pollution Prevention Day has been held for Farmington students since 1997. For 2006, staff is anticipating more than 525 4th grade participants. Staff will communicate the City's appreciation on behalf of the Council to Dakota Electric Association for their support of Pollution Prevention Day. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the attached resolution accepting the donation from Dakota Electric Association. Respectfully Su ~n Public Works Administrative Assistant RESOLUTION No. R -06 ACCEPTING DONATION OF $1000 FROM DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION FOR POLLUTION PREVENTION DAY Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the ih day of August, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, Dakota Electric Association has donated $1000 towards Pollution Prevention Day; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept such donations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby accepts the generous donations of $1 000 from Dakota Electric Association to be used for Pollution Prevention Day. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 7th day of August 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of August 2006. City Administrator SEAL /,' City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, Minnesota 55024 (651) 463-7111 . (651) 463-2359 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Adminjstrat~ Missie Kohlbeck, Senior Center Coordinator - ~?\...:> .~ ,"'.-. - ~ FROM: SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation - Memorial Jerry Wicktor DATE: August 7,2006 INTRODUCTION A donation has been received at the Rambling River Center from the Wicktor Family in memory of Jerry Wicktor. DISCUSSION Jerry Wicktor passed away on June 15, 2006. In a discussion prior to his death, he stated that he wanted the Rambling River Center to receive money that was to be given as a memorial. His family is making this memorial donation to honor Mr. Wiktor's wish. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution accepting the donations of $450 as a memorial to Jerry Wicktor Respectfully Submitted, \ ~ ~Olll,tQ ct Missie Kohlbeck Senior Center Coordinator RESOLUTION No. ACCEPTING DONATION OF $450 IN MEMORY OF JERRY WICKTOR Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the ih day of August, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, the Wicktor Family has donated $450 in memory of Jerry Wicktor. WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept such donations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby accepts with gratitude the generous donation of $450 from Wicktor Family in memory of Jerry Wicktor. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the ih day of August 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of August 2006. City Administrator SEAL . . . 7' 'J City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administratorg FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - 2006 Seal Coat Project DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION /DISCUSSION The 2006 Seal Coat Project is complete. The final project costs for this project will be allocated using the methodology presented at the project hearing. BUDGET IMPACT The proposed assessments for this project as outlined at the project hearing are set by the City's Assessment Policy. The proposed assessment roll will be available prior to the assessment hearing. The Council will consider adopting the final project assessment roll at the assessment hearing for the project. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution directing staff to prepare the final assessment roll and setting the assessment hearing for the 2006 Seal Coat Project for September 5, 2006. Respectfully submitted, ~Yh~ Lee M. Mann, P .E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file RESOLUTION NO. R -06 CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PROJECT NO. - 2006 SEAL COAT Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City of the ih day of August, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members present: Members absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution. WHEREAS, a contract has been let and costs have been determined for the following improvements: Proi. No. 06-04 Description Seal coating Location various - see Attachment A ;and, WHEREAS, the improvements for the project are complete. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. Staff is hereby directed to prepare the proposed final assessment roll for the project. 2. A hearing shall be held in the Council Chambers in City Hall on the 5th day of September, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. to act upon such proposed assessment at such time and place and all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and the clerk shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Notice shall be provided in accordance with the requirements provided under M.S. section 429.061 subdivision 1. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the ih day of August, 2006. Mayor Attested to the _ day of August 2006. City Administrator SEAL Attachment A Streets Dakota County Estates rt Addition I 80th Street West Upper I 82nd Street West Empire Trail Emerald Trail I 80th Court Embers Avenue Embers Avenue Ely Avenue Deer Meadows rt and 2nd Additions I 80th Street Eventide Way Exter Court Exter Place Everglade Court Meadow Creek 1st and 2nd Additions 18ih Street I 87th Street Court I 891h Street 190th Street Dylan Drive Dupont Way Dunbury Avenue Vermillion Grove rt and 2nd Additions 197th Street 198th Street English Avenue Emerson Court Emerson Circle Emperor Court English Court 2061h Street Middle Creek Estates Dyers Pass Location Pilot Knob to Ellice Lane Pilot Knob to Ellice Lane 180th Street West to Embers Avenue 180lh Street West to the east phase line of Dakota County Estates 151 Addition All North of 180lh Street West Emerald Trail to the south phase line of Dakota County Estates 151 Addition All West of Pilot Knob All All All All Dunbury Avenue to the west phase line of Meadow Creek 2nd Addition All Dunbury Avenue to the west phase line of Meadow Creek 151 Addition Dunbury Avenue to 189th Street I 89th Street to the north phase line of Meadow Creek 2nd Addition All South phase line of Meadow Creek 151 Addition to the north phase line of Meadow Creek 2nd Addition Pilot Knob to English Avenue English Avenue to Akin Road 19S1h Street to south phase line of Vennillion Grove 151 Addition All All All All Pilot Knob to Cypress Drive All Streets Location Downtown Oak Street Spruce Street Walnut Street Walnut Street Locust Street Maple Street Beech Street Division Street 1 st Street 1 st Street 2nd Street 3rd Street 4th Street Division Street to railroad tracks Denmark A venue to railroad tracks Division Street to 1 st Street 2nd Street to 5th Street West of 1 st Street Railroad tracks to 4th Street 2nd Street to 3rd Street Elm Street to Walnut Street North of Elm Street Elm Street to Ash Street Maple Street to Walnut Street Ash Street to Walnut Street Maple Street to Walnut Street 9th Street 213th Street to Pine Street Ice Arena Parking Lot Fire Station Parking Lot Rambling River Parking Lot All All All 7L City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator l/ FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - Hill Dee Reconstruction Project DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION IDISCUSSION The Hill Dee Reconstruction project is scheduled to be near substantial completion by the beginning of October. BUDGET IMPACT The proposed assessments for this project as outlined at the project initiation are set by the benefit appraisal. The proposed assessment roll will be available prior to the assessment hearing. The Council will consider adopting the final project assessment roll at the assessment hearing for the project. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution directing staff to prepare the final assessment roll and setting the assessment hearing for the Hill Dee Reconstruction project for October 2, 2006. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Lee M. Mann, P .E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file RESOLUTION NO. R -06 CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PROJECT NO. 06-02 - HILL DEE AREA STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City of the ih day of August, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members present: Members absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution. WHEREAS, a contract has been let and costs have been determined for the following improvements: Proi. No. 06-02 Description Hill Dee Area Street and Utility Reconstruction Project Location All of Upper and Lower 182nd Street W., Euclid Avenue and Facade Avenue in Hill Dee ; and, WHEREAS, the improvements for the project are scheduled to be substantially complete by October 1 st, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. Staff is hereby directed to prepare the proposed final assessment roll for the project. 2. A hearing shall be held in the Council Chambers in City Hall on the 2nd day of October, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. to act upon such proposed assessment at such time and place and all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and the clerk shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Notice shall be provided in accordance with the requirements provided under M.S. section 429.061 subdivision 1. This resolution adopted by recorded vote ofthe Farmington City Council in open session on the ih day of August, 2006. Mayor Attested to this _ day of August, 2006. City Administrator SEAL 71Y} City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council members, City Administratrf FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - Authorize Advertisement of Bids 20Sth Street Project DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION The 20Sth Street Project from the existing Industrial Park to Pilot Knob Road is a required improvement as identified within the developers agreement for the Industrial Park 3rd Addition. DISCUSSION Per the approved development agreement, the City will be contributing $200,000 of M.S. A. funds for the project. Because the City is contributing M.S.A. funds toward the improvements, the project will need to go to bids as a City proj ect per the requirements of the State of Minnesota for the use of State Aid Funds. BUDGET IMPACT The City will be contributing $200,000 toward the project costs per the approved development agreement for the Farmington Industrial Park 3rd Addition. The remainder of the project costs will be borne by the developer. ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the advertisement for bids for the 20Sth Street Extension Project. Respectfully Submitted, ~yY(~ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file \ RESOLUTION NO. R -06 AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS PROJECT 06-12, 208TH STREET EXTENSION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the ih day of August, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, plans and specifications have been prepared with reference to the following improvements: Proi. No. 06-12 Description Street and Utility Improvements Location West of existing 20Sth Street in Farmington Industrial Park to Pilot Knob Road/CSAH 31. And; WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R99-05, the City Council approved the developers agreement for the Farmington Industrial Park 3rd Addition at the August 1,2005 Farmington City Council Meeting. And' WHEREAS, the extension of 20Sth Street is a required improvement ofthe Farmington Industrial Park 3rd Addition developers agreement. And; WHEREAS, the City of Farmington shall contribute $200,000 of Municipal State Aid funds to the construction costs of the 20Sth Street Extension project per the approved developers agreement for the Farmington Industrial Park 3rd Addition. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the Farmington Independent and the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the construction of such improvement under the approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published at least once in the Farmington Independent and in the Construction Bulletin no less than three weeks before the last day for submission of bids. The advertisement shall specify the work to be done, shall state that the bids will be opened for consideration publicly at 10:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by two or more designated officers or agents of the municipality and tabulated in advance of the meeting at which they are to be considered by the Council, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the Clerk for 5% of the amount of each bid. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 7th day of August, 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of August, 2006. City Administrator SEAL 717 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farminfrton.mn.lls TO: Mayor and Councilmembers City Administratol! FROM: Daniel M. Siebenaler, Police Chief SUBJECT: School and Conference Investigations DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION / DISCUSSION Detective Sergeant Hollatz has submitted a request to send two detectives to the Minnesota Sex Crimes Investigation Association Conference. The conference is held at Nisswa, Minnesota on October 4-6 and covers a broad range of investigative topics. It also provides a valuable networking opportunity for detectives. BUDGET IMPACT The registration cost of the conference is $170 per person with meals and lodging at $60 per person per day. The total cost to send two detectives to the conference is $340 for registration and $360 for meals and lodging. These costs are included in the Investigations Divisions 2006 training budget. ACTION REQUESTED Information only. Respectfully submitted, Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 70 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter Herlofsky City Administrator SUBJECT: Interim Police Chief DATE: August 7, 2006 Effective August 12, 2006 I am recommending that Sgt. Brian Linquist be appointed as Interim Police Chief for the City of Farmington. I had a chance to visit with all of the supervisors in the Police Department and have interviewed those who have shown an interest. Based on the discussions I have had, Mr. Lindquist would be the best person to lead our Police Department following Mr. Siebenaler's retirement. We will be proceeding with the replacement of Chief Siebenaler over the next couple of months and I am very confident Mr. Lindquist can handle the responsibilities over this period of time. Respe:j:~it1?0 Peter Herlofs~ (/ City Administrator . CMuller/Herlofsky/Council memos/Interim Police Chief City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us ~ TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter Herlofsky City Administrator SUBJECT: Identify Voting Member for Dakota Communications Center DATE: August 7, 2006 Due to the retirement of Police Chief Siebenaler, a new voting member and alternate to the Law Enforcement Operations Subcommittee of the Dakota Communications Center needs to be appointed. In the previous Council item, Council appointed Sgt. Brian Lindquist as Interim Police Chief. Therefore, Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution appointing Sgt. Brian Lindquist as a new voting member and Sgt. James Murphy as the alternate. ( Respectfully SUbmitt..ed', / k/~ ~J--, ~ I,?-/// Peter Herlofsky /i/ City AdministrMor CMuller/Herlofsky/Council memos/Identify Voting Member DCC RESOLUTION NO. R -06 Resolution Appointing the City of Farmington voting member and alternate to the Law Enforcement Operations Subcommittee of Dakota Communications Center Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the ih day of August 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, The City of Farmington adopted Resolution R60-05 on May16, 2005 authorizing participation in a countywide Joint Dispatch Center to be governed by ajoint powers agreement that will give all participants a strong voice in the operations and management of the Center; and WHEREAS, The authorizing resolution directs that the City Council appoint voting members to operational committees of the Dakota Communications Center; and WHEREAS, The current voting member, the Farmington Police Chief, has submitted his retirement notice; and WHEREAS, The City council has appointed Sergeant Brian Lindquist as Acting Police Chief. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the City of Farmington hereby appoints Sergeant Brian Lindquist as its voting member of the Law Enforcement Operations Subcommittee ofthe Dakota Communication Center; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City of Farmington hereby names Sergeant J ames Murphy as the designated alternate to Sergeant Lindquist. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the ih day of August 2006. Mayor Attested to the day of 2006. City Administrator SEAL City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us ~ FROM: Mayor, Council Members, IIf U City Administrator i Lee Smick, AICP City Planner TO: SUBJECT: 2006 State of the County DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION The City Administrator's Office recently distributed two documents to the City Council titled Dakota County 2006 State of the County: Measuring Progress and Dakota County 2006 Evaluation Scorecard: Measuring Progress. The following information is a summarization of some of the key trends and changes occurring in Dakota County, and their implications, including opportunities and challenges that will need to be evaluated for City of Farmington. DISCUSSION The State of the County report identifies the five trends of highest importance in the County including the following: 1. Dakota County continues to expenence population growth and demographic changes. 2. Growth continues and is changing in nature, location, and impact. 3. Water quality and quantity are keys to the future growth. 4. Poverty rates are increasing in Dakota County. 5. Methamphetamine use continues to rise. The trends and changes that are reviewed in this information include the "Changing Population Demographics" and "Impacts to Growth" including Transportation and Water Quality. The information concerning poverty rates and methamphetamine use can be reviewed in the State of the County report. Population According to the State of the County report (Table 1), "Dakota County's population increased 7.7% between 2000 and 2005, with 67% of growth rate due to natural increase." Between 1990 and 2000, the population of Dakota County increased by over 80,000 people. Between 2000 and 2005, the County increased its population by 27,688 . people for a total population of 383,592 at the end of 2005. During that five-year period, 67% of the increased population accounted for was the result of natural increases (the total number of births minus deaths), 14% was from international migration, and 20% was from domestic migration. Table 1 Metropolitan Area County and State Populations, 2000 to 2005 Jurisdiction 2000 July 1, July 1, July 1, 2003 July 1, 2004 July 1, 2005 2000 to 2001 2002 2005% (County) Census Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Change Anoka 298,084 305,486 310,162 314,088 319,548 323,996 8.7% Carver 70,205 73,280 76,075 79,047 81,851 84,864 20.1% Dakota 355,904 363,722 368,750 373,184 378,343 383,592 7.7% Hennepin 1,116,206 1,122,996 1,120,208 1,119,949 1,119,866 1,119,364 0.3% Ramsey 511,035 512,021 509,374 504,477 499,206 494,920 -3.3% Scott 89,498 97,534 103,813 108,896 114,765 119,825 33.0% Wa5hington 201,130 207,287 210,380 213,983 216,153 220,426 9.6% Metropolitan 2,642,062 2,682,326 2,698,762 2,713,624 2,729,732 2,746,987 4.0% Area Minnesota 4,919,479 4,984,621 5,023,526 5,061,662 5,096,546 5,132,799 4.3% Source: US Census Bureau: Census 2000, and Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States, States, and Counties 2001 to 2005. . As part of Dakota County's increase of 27,688 people between 2000 and 2005, the City of Farmington added 5,658 making it the ih fastest growing city in the seven county Twin Cities metro area and providing 20% of the population increase in the County in that time period. The Metropolitan Council recently distributed a news release on July 18, 2006 stating that the metro area has continued to grow, "adding the equivalent of two Bloomingtons since 2000." The regions 10 fastest growing cities include the following: City Population Added 2000-2005 Blaine Shakopee Lakeville Maple Grove Woodbury Eden Prairie Farmington Prior Lake Minneapolis Chaska 9,006 8,767 8,594 8,005 7,628 6,054 5,658 5,478 4,964 4,864 Once again, Farmington is the ih fastest growing city between 2000 and 2005 in the metro area, while Lakeville was the 3rd fastest growing city, and is the only other community in Dakota County to make this list. Rate of Growth . The rate of land development within Dakota County peaked in the 1990's, with almost 2,900 acres of land being used on average each year. Since 2000, the County's land development rate has decreased to 2,300 acres. Infill will continue in the northern communities of Dakota County such as West St. Paul, South St. Paul, however most of the new land development will continue to occur in the central and southern portions of . . . the County. The County forecasts most of the new development to occur in the next 25 years in Farmington, Lakeville, Inver Grove Heights, and Rosemount. As shown on Map 1 from the State of the County report, Farmington has two areas that have active and proposed residential development in the last four years. One area occurs in the north central portion of the City that includes developments such as Meadow Creek, Autumn Glen, and Parkview Ponds. The second area shown on the map indicates proposed residential growth in the Spruce Street Master Plan area. Both of these areas show 501- 1000 units of active and proposed residential development. Additional areas on the north and central portions of the City show 0-100 units of development. Active and proposed commercial development is also indicated on the map near the Tamarack Ridge retail development, the Spruce Street commercial area, and the commercial nodes along Pilot Knob Road. Housing Since 2000, the number of multi-family housing units in Dakota County has increased to 63% for overall new construction versus the number of single-family housing units at 37% (Figure 1). Figure 1. Single and Multi-Family Building PennltB - Dakota County & Fannlngton, 1999-2005 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 .. 50.0 c:: . I! . Q, 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 1999 --DC SF --DC MF ""-FA SF --FAMF 2002 Year 2003 2004 2005 2000 2001 In contrast, Farmington has seen a trend in recent years where the single and multi-family units are almost at 50% for both products, with single-family construction in 2005 being built at a rate of 55% versus 45% for multi-family housing. However, this was not always the case in Farmington. In 1999-2000, over 70% of the housing constructed in Farmington was single-family. By late 2000, Bristol Square and Glenview Townhomes were the first multi-family projects proposed in the City in many years. In 2000 and 2001, multi-family housing units jumped above single-family construction, however, that trend was short-lived, and from 2003 to 2005, multi-family units constructed in the City . . . ~~ Map 1 e Legend __,,__ ActI"_l'r__ eoon-_~ "'_00"'- (UnIIa, .1000. SOl - 1000 10\ .500 0.\00 _ R.cena, P~d m lolinlng (';.J @.:...",.I.arge . . Medium . Small o 20.0 Growl> D "'USA Line ~~. ~7 (i4 .' ~ ........,.. ~~~ ......,N.W~ 11 -* E;~~';; .. ~ J" &--- & + I ~ wI'! 1 (..... 51 ~ CASTLE ROCK l'M' ~! I ~ _~ I ~. ,Ii, * It.;:b GR~ENV"'~1\M> ~ DAKOTA COUNTY 2006 INDICATORS REPORT PAGE 29 OF 40 . fell below single-family units. Overall, the current construction of single-family and multi-family units being built in the City is almost at the same rate. The City believes that this trend will continue in the upcoming years. This means that more multi-family housing units and locations in the City and County provide more options for lifecyc1e and affordable housing opportunities. Costs of Owner-Occupied Housing Median sale prices of home purchases have continued to climb steadily in Dakota County since 1997 (Figure 2). The average cost of purchasing a home increased by 86% between Figure 2 Median Sales Price of Homes Dakota County and Twin Cities, 1997-2005 . $50,000 __ Dakota --- Twin Cities $250,000 $200,000 8 $150,000 't: D. c 01 i :E $100,000 $0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 1995 and 2005 (or an average of 11 % per year). The average cost reached $232,000 in 2005, slightly higher than the Twin Cities average of $228,000. However, as has been reported in recent months, the median home price has fallen slightly from the 2005 County number of $232,000. Just recently in Farmington, the median price of a home in Farmington in June of 2006 was $226,000. At the same time last year, the median price of a home in Farmington in June of 2005 was $230,000. These numbers were derived from the recent report from the Southern Twin Cities Association of Realtors. The group has just recently started publishing median home prices for individual cities in the metro area, so no data is available for median home prices any earlier than January of2005. Rental Rates . The Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) monitors the multi-family housing rental market yearly to fully understand the market and effectively administer the Housing Choice Voucher Program. Rental rates in the County are examined by the CDA to ensure that rents charged for units assisted by the voucher program are reasonable in relation to the private rental units. Table 2 shows the comparison of rental rates in 2005 between Farmington and Dakota County. The rental amounts included in the table below show rates as of March 1,2005. As the table illustrates, Farmington's rental rates for efficiency and one bedroom units are approximately $150 less than Dakota County's overall rents. For two bedroom and three bedroom units, Farmington's rents are between $225 and $295 less than the County rents. Table 2 2005 AVERAGE RENTS AND AMOUNT OF INCREASE OR (DECREASE) FROM 2004 CITY OF FARMINGTON Unit Size 2005 Average Dollar Amount of Percent Change Rents Change from 2004 Efficiency $430.00 ($38.33) -8.19% One Bedroom $571.00 $2.25 0.40% Two Bedroom $670.00 ($17.50) -2.56% Three Bedroom $895.00 $37.50 4.37% Unit Size 2005 Average Dollar Amount of Percent Change Rents Change from 2004 DAKOTA COUNTY Efficiency $569.95 ($10.73) -1.85% One Bedroom $720.74 ($7.87) -1.08% Two Bedroom $894.68 ($3.27) -0.36% Three Bedroom $1,190.51 $2.10 0.18% With this comparison, Farmington is in a good position to provide affordable housing in the County; however, the number of rental units available may be an issue for the City. The following information shows the percentage of the rental market in selected cities throughout Dakota County: City Percent of Rental Market in the County Rosemount Farmington Mendota Heights Lakeville Hastings South St. Paul Apple Valley Inver Grove Heights West St. Paul Eagan Bumsville 0.75% 0.84% 1.10% 2.73% 3.41% 3.53% 7.51% 10.99% 11.71 % 25.14% 31.60% As shown above, Farmington's share of the rental market in the County is minimal, but this is most likely due to its developing status. Comparatively, Eagan and Burnsville are north fringe communities in the County and capture a large portion of the rental market due to their proximity with major interstates in the County (ie., 35W, 494, and 35E). Staff will be reviewing the City's share of the rental market in the County and will begin to discuss locations that are suitable for multi-family rental units. Transportation Dakota County has acknowledged the need to address transportation issues on Trunk Highway 3 between Inver Grove Heights and Farmington. Based on the State of the County report, Dakota County supports the need to perform a corridor study for Trunk Highway 3 done in cooperation with MnDOT and affected communities along the corridor. Future traffic from developments in Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount, Empire Township, Lakeville, and Farmington will soon exceed the design capacity of Trunk Highway 3 and the need for the County and the affected communities to pursue MnDOT to redesignate TH 3 from a "preservation highway" should be a priority. Transit The Metropolitan Council has recently distributed a "System Statement Plan" to Farmington identifying transportation considerations affecting the City in the future. During Farmington's preparation of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update, the Met Council has identified the need for Farmington to consider the potential for transit service in the City. As shown on Map 2, Farmington is outside of the Metropolitan Transit Taxing District. The north and south portions of Farmington are in Market Area III and the central portion is in Market Area IV. Farmington is in the area of potential transit service expansion, prompting the need for the City to discuss transit in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update. Service options for Market Area III include peak-only express, small vehicle circulators, midday circulators, special needs paratransit (ADA, seniors) and ridesharing. Water Quality vs. Development Regarding water quality, more residential construction is occurring in areas of the County with aquifers that are sensitive to pollution (47% since 2000 vs. 22% before 2000). Due to recent requirements by agencies such as the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Dakota County Soil & Water Conservation District, non-structural ("green infrastructure") methods for managing runoff and promoting infiltration are increasingly being used (sedimentation ponds, riparian buffers, and rain gardens). Like most communities in central to southern Dakota County, Farmington gets its drinking water from the Prairie Du Chen - Jordan Aquifer. As shown on Map 3, in the past 9 years, Farmington has been developing within high sensitivity zones for potentially polluting the groundwater. In contrast to "green infrastructure" there are also "best management practices" (BMP) approach to protecting the lakes, rivers, streams, and aquifers in the County. The same agencies mentioned above, along with the newly restructured Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Board are requiring stringent methods to protect surface water and groundwater in the County and within the City of Farmington. The BMP requirements include installing storm water infiltration ponds, establishing buffers of land along rivers, streams, and wetlands to minimize or prevent pollution of groundwater. Additionally, impervious surfaces constructed due to new development impair the recharge of groundwater aquifers, causing the need to monitor the quality and quantity of groundwater constantly. . Map 2 Area of Potential Transit Service Expansion o Transit Taxing DIstrict _ Potential Trlirlsit Explirlsion Areas . ~ ~''''' "" ,. . ~ ..\ . ,- .. . ,,)\ 0 5 10 I I o . ..'~ ?- o Q ". '~tQ -'1J:I'. 20 Miles I AugJst 2004 . T-6 . . . ~ Map 3 Areas of Dakota County that are Sensitive to Groundwater Pollution e ----=- ,................... .....,~.... a.....,.,. eM ............ .. ""..... o.MIa C4MMIy .. Mt ........... lOt.., -.cCurK........ C....... _oro _~OlO<.oI___ _ Very High (hours to months) _ High (weeks to years) _ High-Moderate (years to decades) _ Moderate (serveral years to decades) _ Low-Moderate (several decades) _ Low (several decades to a century) _ Very Low (more than a century) ..... Sensitivity of the Prairie du Chien Aquifer to Pollution DAKOTA COUNTY 2006 INDICATORS REPORT PAGE 35 OF 40 As discussed above, new development in the County and in Farmington will require a fine balance between "green infrastructure" and "best management practices" techniques in order to protect and maintain our water resources into the future. ACTION REQUESTED Information only. Respectfully Submitted, Lee Smick, AICP City Planner City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us /r TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter Herlofsky, City Administratr~ SUBJECT: Set Council W orkshop"---V DATE: August 7, 2006 Staff is requesting Council schedule a workshop to discuss the following items: - City Hall - Southeast Area Studies - TH3 Funding Set a Council Workshop for August 14,2006 at 5:00 p.m. R~;~ Peter Herlofsk1 City Administrator ./) CMuller/Herlofsky/Council memos/Set Council Workshop City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and coun~c'.. mbers Peter Herlofsky \ / \ Farmington Cataract Relief Association FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: August 7, 2006 Attached is a copy of the Relief Association's request for 2007. Please receive this document and we will be providing additional information as we proceed with the budget process. Respectfully submitted, Peter Herlofsky City Administrator CMuller/Herlofsky/Council memos/Cataract Relief Assoc Request 75 Date: July 31,2006 From: May & Council Farmington Cataract Relief Association Association Pension Request for 2007 To: Subject: The Board of the Farmington Fire Department Cataract Relief Association met to discuss the pension request for 2007. In looking over the Stanton Group 6 City pension amount average, we are substantially below the average. The goal of the Board is to get to this average over a three year period. After much discussion the Board felt that an increase in the city's contribution and also an increase in the yearly pension were in order. The Cataract Relief Association is requesting a yearly increase from $3,350.00 to $3,750.00. The city's contribution that we are requesting is $65,000.00 . If you have any questions please feel free to contact President Bill Sauber. Thank you. Respectfully submitted, ~?[d~ Thomas E. Hemish Secretary c.c. Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator Robin Roland, City Finance Director Cataract Board of Directors File /tt' City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463=7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us August 7, 2006 Paul Burkel Dakota County Fair P.O. Box 73 Farmington, MN 55024 Dear Paul: The City of Farmington is in receipt of your request to extend the Fire Service Agreement for Fire Department coverage for events at this year's fair. The contract expired December 31, 2005. The City will extend the agreement for one year (until December 31, 2006) at a flat fee of $5,000. This fee takes into account the City's 2006 Fees and Charges Ordinance for the following dates, equipment and personnel: Monday 8/7 Wednesday 8/9 Thursday 8110 Friday 8/11 Saturday 8/12 Sunday 8/13 3.5 Hours for (1) tanker truck and (3) firefighters (4 - 7:30 pm) 3.0 Hours for (1) tanker truck and (8) firefighters (7 - 10 pm) 3.0 Hours for (1) tanker truck and (8) firefighters (7 - 10 pm) 3.0 Hours for (1) tanker truck and (8) firefighters (7 - 10 pm) 3.0 Hours for (1) tanker truck and (8) firefighters (7 - 10 pm) 3.0 Hours for (1) tanker truck and (8) firefighters (12:30 - 3:30 pm) Chief Tim Pietsch has assured me that he will have the truck and personnel on site at 4 pm today. The City's contract with the Dakota County Fair (as extended) states that the City will provide this service and assume all responsibility for the equipment and personnel to be provided, including but not limited to the compensation and insurance matters. Sjnce~ RObinROlan~ Finance Director Cc: Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator.- Farmington Council members ,/. .' Tim Pietsch, Fire Chief i; U " \,.~ 15a... City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator ~. Lee Smick, AICP City Planner I?f c.- Date Filed: 7-20-06 Date Complete: Action Deadline: TO: SUBJECT: Approve Grading Conditional Use Permit - Christensen Property DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION Jay & Patricia Christensen, on behalf of ISD #192, have applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow grading by the School District's contractors within an area approximately 150 feet wide and 1,300 feet long (4.5 acres) located along the northern boundary line of the Christensen property which is located adjacent to the southern boundary of the site of the new high school (Exhibit A). The grading will create a level surface for construction trailers and temporary employee parking. At the July 11, 2006 Planning Commission meeting (see attached minutes), the Commissioners unanimously recommended that the City Council approve the CUP for the grading on the Christensen Property. DISCUSSION The Grading CUP application was submitted to the City on July 20,2006. However, because the property owners, Jay & Patricia Christensen, did not sign the original application, the submittal has been determined to be incomplete. When a copy of the application is submitted to the City with the Christensens' signatures, the application will be considered complete. At the time of this writing, the requested application had not been submitted. An update concerning the application will be presented at the August ih City Council meeting. Section 3-22-5 of the City Code requires an application for a Conditional Use Permit to mine, excavate, or grade material within the City limits. Section 3-22-5 (A) of the City Code provides, in part, that: An application for a mine or excavation permit shall be processed in accordance with the same procedures and requirements... relating to conditional use permits. However, the hearing shall be held by the city council following a review and recommendation from the planning commission. Conditional Use Permit - Christensen Property Grading The property owner has applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for grading a ISO-foot wide by 1,300-foot long area (4.5 acres) in order to provide a flat surface to the existing grade for the location of construction trailers and employee parking on the Christensen Property (Exhibit B). The grading will occur entirely on the Christensen property, directly south of storm basin 2 on the Site Logistics Plan (Exhibit C). A crop of soybeans currently exists on the 4.5 acre site. The grading on the Christensen Property will require the moving of over 1,000 cubic yards of earth, prompting the need for a Conditional Use Permit. The project proposes a flat-surfaced staging pad for up to six construction trailers to be utilized by the general contractor and sub-contractors (Exhibit D). Employee parking will also be graded to a flat surface. The 4.5 acre site currently shows a hill in the middle of the grading site. The existing high point is approximately 972 feet and the grade falls to the west to 946 feet, (approximately a 26-foot grade change) and to the east to 950 feet, (approximately a 22-foot grade change). The existing soil on the Christensen property will be smoothed to a flat surface utilizing the existing hill top and grading to the west and east of the site. Class 5 will then be hauled to the property to create the driving/parking surface and reduce soil erosion on the site. The applicant is also proposing to locate a temporary power panel, overhead power/phone lines on poles, a dumpster, portable toilets, and a project development sign. The project is being requested because the entire school site will be graded all at one time, and no additional space for construction trailers and employee parking is available on the school property. Public hearing notices were sent to adjacent property owners on July 7,2006 (Exhibit E). ACTION REQUESTED Approve the Conditional Use Permit for grading on the Christensen Property, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must obtain final City approval of the grading operation and the rough grading plan from the City Engineer. 2. The applicant must pay any applicable fees, provide adequate surety in an amount and form approved by the Director of Public Works, and comply with any other reasonable conditions imposed by the Director of Public Works. 3. All excavation activities must be consistent with plans submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works. cc: Jay and Patricia Christensen ISD #192 07/20/06 THU 12:20 FAX 651 463 6530 ISD 192 - BLDG & GROUNDS 14:1002 D [g @ ~ O~,-~ JUL20 f3X', A .City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.&rmimrton.mn.us ~ II Address: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ~:ll) 1f/11.- . Telepbone: (In~ 171 ;JMAM'T ~~ .~Vt~fWl Street City ]:J"h 1tJ '71, Telephone; (-) 1'1/ f) MfJuf * - (ihz~ pt<,j r;5f) t.t{ Street City State Zip Code Ptod...I........' ~~~~~..e'~:.....~iP,~:61 ftlVj(;/'Jff At/. II - j r:A-tZiM FP'l If) SpedficN._ofRe'l.....' '1M -mn. '-,tot/O' fit{ j~,J -[bfd 0 0 'lJiiIJJl7ZR()Jd?jf 1f1'f-~'TQfI(J Fax: d!h ,/&"'J/5fJ41 {MtJ ~svvf State Zip Code Applicant: Address: - Fax: (-) - Owner: Cuueut Zoning District ~~~~;~~:.!:.~~'i::1?"":f>......,........ .,...,;;fi;~i.;!?;~J;[;~;;$M;:;r$~~%;~?aIJj~~~~[~?~4ef~w~~;". .... N A .l!l 'E :::::; .t=- o ~ .;;; Q) -'" '" ...J Christensen Property {X, D Donnell Property Q) > <C ~ ro - CJl Cl ro u::: ~ Q0 o ~ ~t-.. ~ """ Grading proposed Pedersen Property Christensen Property l- LL. -=c a: Q ;;-. w U Z W u. w w ... z in ::; :r ~ ~ < D1! 0.. W W 0 0.. Z 0.. 0 D1! :;; co: l:! 0.. U I . . . . 1 . 0 ~II . . . 0 . . . ~I . 0 . . ~Z ~H'l Z" ~I!! C)z ::>w_ ~5~ zZc: ~~~ ....r---__ ( 0 ~'~~~ I __~_ 0 {} ~~"''''''__ I ---,.......~ """L.. '11 ----'..:::-' ) , "~, <::>....... 0 II ""~~::::~----:_----- + + ~ Z w :::> o w UJ '" '" o ;: iE '" <l: UJ -' <l: >= ~ C <l: ::E ~ ~ ~I-!Q: : m~~ g~~ N ~;t!::: ~g:u. ~ z~~~~~~5~~~ Q~:x:~g~5~~tnfCO ~u..~::EZOCl)<.')z5~ ffi~g~~~5~~e~ :r~:r:t;~al~5UJ<.')(f) !:!?O~UJa:LU<(a:I:::Z~ ~g:~~~~5~~~l5 t;5t;rl~u.o~s:zffi5 UJt)wOCl) _ \ .L~\~~ ~'~~\l R\~~i.. ~ ~ ~~~ o o (0 o L!) ~ w :( Cl iE ~~i5 wd(l) C)........ o::><l: <ClZ!i! >-ZOO a:~i=a: (52S~~ i5!i!;:~ ~~~~ + 10 -~~-=--- r=-l J ~ g .... iii ~d~ Zow ::>UJC w C) u: Zu. 00 UJ.... ZC) ww ....~ "'0 0", ::En. ~ Q <;;J D. <;;JCJO OD ~~: . . . . w . -:-.i-._.~"\ ..........:3.. · . I...... . · I I , : I ~i ~ I + +"----, ~z ~Q 5~ ~~ ::>w- ~b~ zZQ, ~gt. ~ ~ ~ ~ Jit~ 1 Cl iii .... C) w o '" Q, o o M (0 o o N L!) >- .....J ::) --:l f'X c o w ~ o ..J~ o~ o~ ~g (J)~ :1:0 C)o:l - :1: Z o I- C) Z - :E a:: <C LL z <( .....J n.. C/) () ~ C/) (9 o .....J W ~ C/) __._m i etlJ IS l l ~ e I i l!I ! i ~ 1 ~ 3 I 5 ~ l.a, ;j. ~ 11 I 'L I I" ,~~ ~ - - '[ /~ ~.} -- , ~ ---..-. .!i I' -- ,/ /~ ~ '-' "1 \\, ~I ~\ ] ....., ~ ,. 0 i\ ~ ~ ~~ . ~ ~ /""/$ -.. it: ...... ",...~/::I C. ./ ...,; ...,s; Q 1 ~ ...'" /....../,/ .. <Ol. . ... /-A ~ ] ......_... <~::.~ ]1 \ 0.....-- .......1. l ~~ Ii' ...'" ,.1; / "./ ... , ...... ~/I'~ ~ // ~ " .-t ,/ D ;:: \ ~(~ ~,/ II Go D~ ~ ~~. '------- \ r---r---': ~/ d:<~~ I I I ~ f 1 I I I I ~ - -r:..-l:._ _ ]=L. .-.-\ ._, D \ 1,-::...------. )) f!j . '.'- , l '-...J-::, ~- .- ._._~ ( . .;:-:-:: [ J ! ) I I I L- /, / / J ...-----\~((;// / ,/ I ) . _ L---/' ~/'I3IW ~ ! = = = c::=J c:::> c::::> ''\ It" REASONS: APPLICANT: PROPERTY LOCATIONS: City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-1800 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmineton.mn.us ej.t NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Conditional Use Permit - Meadowview Elementary School Borrow Pit Independent School District #192 is proposing to mine sand from its Meadowview Elementary School property in order to use the sand for its new Farmington High School location on the west side of Flagstaff Avenue, south of 200th Street West. B. Conditional Use Permit - Christensen Property Grading ISO #192 is proposing to grade an area approximately 100 feet wide and 1,300 long located along the northern boundary line of the Christensen property which is located adjacent to the southern boundary of the site of the new high school. The grading will create a level surface for construction trailers and temporary employee parking. ISO #192 A. Meadowview Elementary School - Southeast portion of property B. Christensen Property - Northern portion of Christensen property adjacent to the southern border of the new high school site Dear Sir/Madam, A. The Planning Commission will review and make a recommendation to the City Council concerning the Conditional Use Permit for a Borrow Pit at its meeting on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. You are welcome to attend that meeting. The Farmington City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, July 17, 2006 at 7:00 P.M., or soon thereafter in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 325 Oak Street, for consideration of the Conditional Use Permit to mine sand from a borrow pit on the southeastern portion of the Meadowview Elementary School property. All persons desiring to be heard, in person or in writing, will be heard at this time B. The Planning Commission will also review and make a recommendation to the City Council concerning the Conditional Use Permit to conduct grading on the northern boundary of the Christensen property for the location of construction trailers and employee parking. The review will take place on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 at 7:00 PM. You are welcome to attend that meeting. The Farmington City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday. Au~ust 7. 2006 at 7:00 P.M., or soon thereafter in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 325 Oak Street, for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to conduct grading on the northern boundary of the Christensen property. All persons desiring to be heard, in person or in writing, will be heard at this time. If you have any questions regarding these matters prior to the meeting please contact me at (651) 463-1820. Sincerely, Lee Smick, AICP City Planner Planning Commission Minutes July 11, 2006 Page 7 4. Discussion a) Conditional Use Permit - Borrow Pit - Meadowview Elementary School Conditional Use Permit - Grading - Christensen Property Applicant: Independent School District 192 City Planner Smick explained ISD 192 has applied for a conditional use permit to mine sand from its Meadowview Elementary School property and haul the material to the new Farmington High School location west of Flagstaff and south of 200th Street. There is also a second discussion for the Christensen property. The contractors for ISD 192 are proposing to prepare a flat surface for both employee parking and up to six construction trailers to be used for construction of the high school property. Regarding the Meadowview site, there is a 50 ft. hill and it will be taken down to 10 ft. 60,000 cubic yards and 5.8 acres will be taken down. They are proposing to utilize overland trucks and go northwest to Flagstaff. The school has talked to the SWCD and the DNR as far as crossing the creek and the haul route and have had positive conversations with them. There is also the need to get a permit from Dakota County regarding access onto a county roadway. The haul route will go northwest to Flagstaff and then go south to the high school location. These trucks will have some impact on the condition of Flagstaff, however the road will be reconstructed. Commissioner Larson stated it will not be reconstructed during the construction period. Staff stated there is a requirement for maintenance of the road during construction. This will go to the Council on July 17,2006. The next application is for a CUP for the Christensen property. ISD 192 is proposing just off site of the school district property to grade the Christensen property to a flat surface. The grading plan shows an area where they will flatten out the grade. Currently there is a hill. There will be employee parking with up to six construction trailers. There will be silt fence, dumpsters, power poles, etc. As far as reclaiming this, ISD 192 is in negotiations with the Christensen's on purchasing this piece and/or the possibility of getting this back to farm field after construction is done at the high school. This item will go to the Council on August 7, 2006. Conditions are as follows: 1. The applicant must obtain final approval of the mining operation and the rough grading plan from the City Engineer. 2. The applicant must pay any applicable fees, provide an adequate surety in an amount and form approved by the Director of Public Works and comply with any other reasonable conditions imposed by the Director of Public Works which will include the traffic and maintenance of Flagstaff Avenue. 3. All excavation activities must be consistent with plans submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works. Mr. David Peterson, Project Manager, stated one of the issues was traffic control as well as road maintenance. The borrow pit and the office complex are part of Planning Commission Minutes July 11, 2006 Page 8 the overall grading contract for the high school. So the same contractor that is doing 800,000-900,000 yards of earth moving on site is also doing these two other projects. It is all one bid and one contractor. The bid documents will very clearly state their responsibilities for maintaining Flagstaff on a daily basis and keeping it in the condition it is now at a minimum, if not improving it. He felt they will end up improving it. The road maintenance will extend from CRSO to 19Sth Street over the course of the project. The bidders will clearly understand what is expected of them to keep the neighbors safe and the roadways open. This location was chosen out of necessity. The grading plan for the site is such that every yard of dirt gets turned over once or twice and there is no space on site for an office complex. With a project of this size, there will be the need for offices to do their work. They chose this spot in cooperation with the Christensen's and with a lot of discussion with them. They have given the district tentative approval at this point. This will be a betterment for the four acres of their property in that the creation of a high school space creates a very low spot south of the property line. This is almost an unplantable space because of the steepness and collection of water. Raising the grades and flattening it out creates more usable farm land should they decide to go back to that at the end of the proj ect. They would remove the class S and install topsoil and create the farmland that was there before. Chair Rotty noted the borrow pit is fairly close to Charleswood and asked what precautions are taken to lessen the impact on those residents. Mr. Peterson stated there is a buffer, some grasslands and an asphalt path. The pit is quite far away. Commissioner Larson asked what kind of grade they will leave there. Mr. Peterson stated there will be a lOft. rise at the final elevation. They will add topsoil and restore it to the way it is now. Commissioner Johnson asked about the timeline. Mr. Peterson replied it will be a two-month period to complete the mining and the restoration of the area. Commissioner Larson asked if this would be considered a separate job site from the school and will another NPDES permit be required for this site. Another permit will be filed for this site. Commissioner Larson asked if this should be contingent on Met Council approval. Community Development Director Carroll felt it did not have to be a contingency. It is related to the high school, but as it is on separate property, there is not a connection. Commissioner Larson asked about the timeline for bids. Bid documents will be available next Monday and bids will be opened August 8, 2006. This will go to the School Board on August 14, 2006 and also approval of the contract. The start date would be August 21, 2006. Mr. Doug Bonar, ISD 192, stated they are cognizant of the immensity of the Flagstaff proj ect and try to remain sensitive to the impact on this portion of the community. MOTION by Johnson, second by Fitzloff for a favorable recommendation of both CUP's. Commissioner Larson wanted to make sure Engineering pays special attention to Flagstaff. The off-road trucks on Flagstaff do not sit well with him. It could damage the road and cause a hazard. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us lOa.. TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~ Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director FROM: SUBJECT: Community Survey Results DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION The Community telephone survey conducted by CJ Olson Market Research, Inc. has been completed. DISCUSSION A total of 500 telephone surveys of approximately 25 questions were completed. The primary objective of the survey was to gather residents' opinions on a variety of issues relating to city government and city services. Mr. Wayne Ramaker from CJ Olson Market Research, Inc. will present the results of the Community survey and a comparison of survey results to the last survey done in 2001. ACTION REQUESTED Accept 2006 Farmington Community Survey results. Respectfully submitted, ;zt~ ktJAa~ Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director City of Farmington 2006 Community Survey Presented by: Wayne A. Ramaker CJ Olson Market Research, Inc. August 7, 2006 Research Objectives . Determine what types of new or additional businesses that residents would like to see in Farmington. . Gather Demographic Information - age - gender - type of residence - household composition - household income 2006 Farmington Survey Summary Comments . Overall, Farmington is a growing, thriving community with great parks, schools, government, and recreation. . People are very passionate about Farmington and their community as evidenced by their willingness to participate in the survey. . 90% of all people rated the "Quality of Life" in Farmington as either good or excellent. Research Objectives . To gather valuable feedback and identify issues and concerns faced by the City of Farmington and its residents. . To determine what residents like most about living in Farmington, as well as what serious issues face the community. . Gather opinions on public safety issues and on parks and recreation. Methodology . After determining research objectives, a draft of the survey was submitted and approved by the Farmington City Council. . A listed sample of 6000 "random" phone numbers were purchased from a professional sampling service. . A total of 500 interviews were completed from 5/18 to 5/31, 2006. 2006 Farmington Community Survey Summary Comments . The quality of city services is considered to be good, especially garbage disposal, recycling, police protection, fire protection, and the sweeping of streets. . People are most concerned about the City's long-term growth plans and property taxes. 1 . . . City of Farmington Comparing 2001 and 2006 results Most Serious Issues Rapid growth .ZOOI . 1006 .." P1ami/"Q for exp~nf mMlaQII'lQ growth Not enough commercial develOpment 21" Battle 0"'" t-igh School... Schools keepmg up wlh gro'Mh Taxes too higtV propertytaxeSl'lcte$Sll"lQ Cnmel need more palrols 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Quality of Fire Protection 100-;. 90% 80"1. 70% 60% 50% 40% 30"1. 10% 10"1. 0-1. .... .2001 .2006 "",,, ~.~ 4'. ~ cI <,.~ if> o " ~ Like Most about Living Here StMI\oWr'I dclH Ioc;ly, bo.thM.",.,.t_nlMl .1001 . 1006 41" '2" f""'Iy~_ylo ,.eolongwlt'llikethlm 23" QU.I Goodad'o:oMltwoppy ....K_ RII.vw:lntt.-.rtJyf open 'pol':" F..lur./lowcrme r.teI'no~ Aw.rfrorolrNtro.bI.t _r_locaiM 0% 60% 80% 100% 20% 40% c....-_,_ ----..------- Quality of Police Protection 100% 90% 80% 70% 600;0 SOo;o 40% 30% 20% 10% 0./0 .2001 .2006 ,,,'" ~"'~ ~4-'" cI " ~ <,.~ if> o Snowplowing of City Streets 100% 90-;0 80% 70-;0 60% 50% 40% 30% 10% 10% 0% .2001 . 2006 ~ ;1- "'~ cI " ~ <,.~ ~"'I o 2 . Sweeping of City Streets Animal Control .2001 .2006 100% 90% 80% 708/0 600/0 50% 400/0 30010 20010 10% 00/0 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30"10 20% 10% 0% "" .2001 . 2006 ~..~ "'~ cI <,.~ ~.. o ",' ~ ~.~ 4'. ~ cI <,.~ ~.. o .' ~. Garbage Disposal Service . Curbside pick-up was instituted in 2001. . 100"/0 900/8 80-1. 700/0 60"1. SO"!. 40"10 30"10 200/. 10"10 0"1. Increase in Property Taxes 'Would you favor or oppose an increase in city property taxes if it were needed to maintain city services at their current level?' "-* .ZOOI .ZOO6 "" .2001 . 2006 60" ".'" Don'tIuv:lw/Rer..... ~ 4"# ~ cI ...~ ~.. o ",' ~ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Future Development Well-Planned Rate of Development lOOltJo 90"/. 80-10 70"10 .... 600/0 50% 40./0 30% 10% 10% 0% .2001 .2006 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40"1. 30./0 20% lalit/a 0% .2001 .2006 .:.." ~. ,f-/ ~ ~' ~ ...'" >>- ~.. ~ ill. ~a.f. ...'" . 3 . Additional Businesses/ Services Primary Source of Information C.bIoTV .." Mow> .._ New.paper FlllTity~ ,..talIants TargeVWal-Mert NIII_letret Clotl"ingtt.pl!I/'II"rWnt ."". .1001 . ZOO6 1.10011 .1006 G<oco<y .... Nono w.~", 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 1 00% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ol~_T_ -..--..----.-- Accessed City's Website City Staff Service 2006 100% 90.10 800,4 70% . 60.10 50% 40./0 30% 20./0 10-;. 0% ."i.> -- 10% 46% ~': I J L_----...:liii III Excellent . Good . Only Fair . Poor . Don~ Knowl Refused .2001 .2006 ,... ~. Contact with Police Department Nature of Contact with Police 100-10 90% 80% 70-1. 60% 50./0 40illlo 30% 20% 10-1. 0% ."i.> ~11ot_1t~...,. I.Z0011 .ZOO6 .... "" .2001 . 2006 Vdlfnolcm. ~. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% . 4 . . . Greatest Public Safety Problem Quality of Trails Tr.rlle\'iollw.. ""'" 26" .....~ 0% 20% "'~_'_ -. '2" 40% 60% Quality of Parks 100-1. 900/. 800/. 700/. 60% 50% 40-1. 30.4 10% 10% 0% 33" .... 44" ~.~ cI <,.~ "," 0" t.P(" <\;)..c. ~ " .<> ~ .ZOOI . Z006 100% 900/. 800/. 700/. 60% 500/. 400/. 30% 200/0 10% 0% "" "" "" ,.". 80% ~c.<t "," cI <,.~ ~~ o ~~ ~..c. ~ " .<> ~ 100% .2001 .2006 Participated in City Programs .2001 .2006 100% 90% 80% 70./. 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ..." ~. .2001 .2006 5 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us lOb TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter Herlofsky ~ City Administrator~:t:~? SUBJECT: Parks Referendum DATE: August 7, 2006 Randy Distad, the Parks and Recreation Director, has provided information to the City Council regarding a proposed referendum for park improvements in 2006. After reviewing Mr. Distad's report, I would like to make the following recommendation to the City Council. 1. That the consideration of a referendum be tabled until the fall of 2007. 2. That following the receipt of the final plat from Newland for the Fairhill development, that the Parks Department initiate a planning process for the land dedicated for park purposes. 3. The request made by the Parks and Recreation Commission related to a variety of improvements would be best suited for the Newland property especially based on its size. With this in mind the referendum would be offered on the ballot for the fall of 2008 and the time that precedes it would be used to inform the public of the projects. The development ofthe Newland property has not proceeded at a rate that would allow us to consider some of the options noted by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The more time it is taking Newland to do the project will allow us to do sufficient planning to accomplish the overall goals attempted by the Parks and Recreation Commission. ReSP~ly,~Ubmitted..; ) ). <it- L,I /1(; ../ f~ j- / ~/i/ / Peter Herlofsky City Administrator CMuller/Herlofsky/Council memos/Parks Referendum City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director RE: Consider November 2006 Parks and Recreation Referendum DATE: August 7, 2006 BACKGROUND Previously in April 2003, the City Council approved a request from the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) to assemble a Recreational Facilities Task Force to complete a Recreational Facility Needs Study. In February 2004, a Recreational Facilities Needs Study Report was presented and accepted by the City Council that identified five recreational facility priorities for the City. They were as follows: 1. Community center feasibility study 2. Sports complexes including a separate site for youth and adult complexes with a need for 40- 60 acres each 3. Land acquisition that results in larger parcels ofland for a community center, sports complexes and community parks 4. Construct an indoor gymnasium/field house in a community center including the exploration and use of public and private partnerships 5. Expand trail network and connections Subsequently in August 2004, the City Council approved moving forward with completing a Community Center Feasibility Study and the results of the feasibility study were supportive of a community center being built in the community. Further analysis was completed on the construction costs for a community center and a recommendation was brought forward to the City Council at its April 17,2006 meeting to go forward with a referendum during the November 2006 election. The City Council on a 3-2 vote determined that the City should not move forward with a community center referendum due to a need to construct a new city hall, which would result in the City exceeding its bonding capacity should a community center be approved by the voters. The PRAC then met with the City Council in a workshop setting on May 17,2006. At this workshop the City Council gave direction to the PRAC members that they should bring back several recreational facility options for the City Council to consider for a referendum. The PRAC met three times over the past several months including a special meeting on June 21, 2006 to review possible options for a recreational facility referendum. At its July 19,2006 meeting, PRAC members discussed and finalized four referendum options for the City Council to consider. The four options are attached in Exhibit A and include options for indoor recreational facilities, outdoor recreational facilities and park land acquisition. The PRAC has identified the four options in order of priority with Option #1 being the highest priority. The PRAC is unanimously recommending to the City Council that it move forward with Option #1 and hold a referendum in November 2006. BUDGET IMPACT If the City Council wishes to move forward with a referendum, staff could bring back at the August 21, 2006 City Council meeting information about the impact a referendum has on property taxes depending on which option the City Council might be interested in selecting for a referendum. ACTION REQUESTED The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission unanimously approved a recommendation requesting that the City Council, by motion, approve Option #1 (outdoor recreational facilities and land acquisition) for a referendum to be held during the November 2006 election. If the City Council were to approve this option and move forward with a referendum in 2006, then direction would need to be given to staff to prepare for City Council's approval a resolution containing the required ballot language for the improvements identified in Option #1. "tfullY Subrnitt~d, /~f/JM;r? Ran;;;Jtad Parks and Recreation Director cc: Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Members EXHIBIT A OPTION #1 PROPOSED PARKS AND RECREATION REFERENDUM ITEM COST Four field youth baseball complex Newland $1,530,000 Community site Five field soccer complex Newland Community Site $1,031,000 Concession, restroom and storage building for $ 700,000 baseball and soccer complex (3,500 sq ft) Playground equipment for baseball and soccer $ 100,000 complex Picnic shelter for baseball and soccer complex $ 100,000 Basketball full courts (2) $50,000 Sand volleyball courts (2) $10,000 Outdoor hockey rinks (2) $150,000 Finish trail connections (boardwalks and Lake Julia $1,000,000 waterway pedestrian bridge crossing) Purchase 25 acres of land for future expansion of $2,500,000 adult softball field complex Purchase 5 acres of land for Middle Creek Park $400,000 expansIOn Finish development of Middle Creek Park $375,000 TOTAL $7,946,000 7/24/06 OPTION #2 PROPOSED PARKS AND RECREATION REFERENDUM ITEM COST Four field youth baseball complex Newland $1,530,000 Community site Five field soccer complex Newland Community $1,031,000 Site Concession, restroom and storage building for $ 700,000 baseball and soccer complex (3,500 sq ft) Playground equipment for baseball and soccer $ 100,000 complex Picnic shelter for baseball and soccer complex $ 100,000 Basketball full courts (2) $50,000 Sand volleyball courts (2) $10,000 Outdoor hockey rinks (2) $150,000 Finish trail connections (boardwalks and Lake $1,000,000 Julia waterway pedestrian bridge crossing) TOTAL $4,671,000 7/24/06 OPTION #3 PROPOSED PARKS AND RECREATION REFERENDUM ITEM COST Purchase 25 acres of land for future expansion $2,500,000 of adult softball field complex Purchase 5 acres of land for Middle Creek Park $400,000 expansion Complete development of Middle Creek Park $375,000 TOTAL $3,275,000 7/24/06 OPTION #4 PROPOSED PARKS AND RECREATION REFERENDUM ITEM COST Revised community center without aquatic's $7,730,791 component but would include lobby/atrium, Parks and Recreation Department office space, locker rooms, 2 full court gymnasiums, elevated walking track, weight and cardiovascular room, aerobics space, senior center, large meeting room that can be divided into smaller meeting rooms and children's playground Site improvements including parking lot, storm $900,000 water ponds, roadways, utilities, etc. 10o~ Construction contingency $863,079 Design, construction administration, furniture, $1,424,081 fixtures and equipment TOTAL $10,917,951 7/24/06 /t:Je. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrau Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director TO: SUBJECT: Recycling Contract One Year Extension DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION The City previously entered into five year recycling contract with Dick's Sanitation from Lakeville, Minnesota. The contract expires at the end of 2006. DISCUSSION City staff members have begun the process of reviewing the existing recycling contract. Staff would like the City Council to consider extending the recycling contract one additional year with Dick's Sanitation, the current hauler. There are a number of positive reasons for this consideration. 1. Provides additional time to do a more thorough and complete review of the existing contract. Upon starting the review process, staff has found that there are a number of items that it wants to further research regarding enhancements to what is contained in the existing contract. Researching enhancements to the recycling contract will take time. Once this research has been completed, it will take additional time to go through the Request for Proposal (RFP) process to solicit proposals from various haulers for hauling recycling material and then review each proposal and have the City Council approve a contract with a specific hauler. Extending the current contract one year provides the necessary time to carefully go through each of these steps so that the City is able to enter into a new five year recycling contract that will improve upon the contract that will be expiring at the end of 2006. 2. Provides an opportunity to analyze Solid Waste operations In light of the recent meeting that the City Council and City staff had with the City of Red Wing, staff feels that it would be a good time to analyze the entire Solid Waste operations. Creating a one year extension will provide the time needed to completely analyze the Solid Waste operations including both garbage and recycling services. 3. Allows for the recycling schedule to be published in the new 2007 City calendar. Negotiating a one year extension with Dick's Sanitation allows the recycling schedule to be published in the City's 2007 calendar as the current recycling schedule will remain the same in 2007 as what it was in 2006. If the one year extension is not allowed, then it is highly likely that the recycling schedule will not be able to be included in the City's 2007 calendar because of the time it will take to go through the RFP process and the possibility of a different hauler receiving the five year contract that could result in different routes and schedule being set for recycling from what is currently offered. Staff felt that having the recycling schedule in the City calendar is important information for City residents to have at their disposal and wants to make sure that the information concerning the recycling schedule is accurate. 4. Recent community survey shows that residents are satisfied with the current recycling service. Dick's Sanitation provides good recycling service to City residents and works well with staff. If this were not the case, staff would not be comfortable with negotiating a one year extension of the recycling contract with Dick's Sanitation. City staff has contacted Dick's Sanitation staff and they are interested in negotiating a one year extension of the recycling contract. Once the negotiation has been completed, the City Council would be asked to review and take action to approve the extension of the recycling contract with Dick's Sanitation for one additional year. BUDGET IMPACT There will be some staff time involved in negotiating and drafting a one year extension. Beyond that, there are no other budget impacts known. ACTION REQUESTED Approve by motion directing staff to negotiate a one year extension of the recycling contract with Dick's Sanitation and bring back the negotiated contract for review and approval by the City Council. ~I~d' Randy Distad Parks and Recreation Director Jla- City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator () FROM: Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Proposed Orderly Annexation Agreement (Castle Rock Township) DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION At its meeting on July 24,2006, the Castle Rock Town Board approved a modified version of the Orderly Annexation Agreement [OAA] that the Farmington City Council had approved on June 5,2006. The Town Board and City staff are interested in determining whether the modifications proposed by the Township are acceptable to the City Council. DISCUSSION A. Orderly Annexation Af!reement: The City Council approved a draft of a proposed Orderly Annexation Agreement (see attached Exhibit A) at its meeting on June 5, 2006. That document was then forwarded to Castle Rock Township for its review. The Town Board discussed the agreement at meetings that were held on June 13,2006 and June 29, 2006, but did not take formal action on the proposed agreement at those times. Meetings of the Farmington/Castle Rock Discussion Group were held on June 21,2006 and July 18, 2006, and at those meetings the Farmington representatives emphasized the need for the Town Board to take some type of formal action regarding the proposed agreement (i.e., vote to approve it or not approve it, vote on an alternative version, etc.). At the next meeting ofthe Town Board on July 24, 2006, a motion was made to approve the version of the OAA that the City Council has approved on June 5, 2006. That motion failed on a 2-3 vote. A Town Board member then passed out and explained a revised version of the OAA (see attached Exhibit B). A subsequent motion to approve the revised OAA was then passed on a 4-1 vote. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a table that identifies the differences between the initial version and the (proposed) revised version of the OAA. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a Memo that specifically addresses the Township's proposal that the "administrative fee" be increased from 7.5% to 15%. B. Annexation(s) bv Ordinance: If the City Council approves the version of the OAA that has been offered by the Township, City staff will then work with the City Attorney to prepare the Joint Resolutions that will be needed to finalize the immediate annexations of the Olson (Fountain Valley Golf Course) and Mock properties. That course of action would enable the City to annex 100% of the Olson property at one time. However, if the City Council does not approve the OAA version in question, the Council may then wish to consider other options regarding those properties. One such option would be to direct staff to initiate an annexation by ordinance for each of the two properties. Under the applicable Minnesota statute, City staff would need to schedule a public hearing on each of the proposed annexations and give 30 days' written notice (by certified mail) to the Township and to all landowners located within and contiguous to the area(s) to be annexed. The first regular City Council meeting at which the required public hearing could be held would be on September 18, 2006. Pursuant to a new annexation provision that was adopted by the 2006 Legislature, no more than 120 acres ofthe l60-acre Olson property could be annexed by ordinance at one time, and no additional property owned by Mr. Olson could be annexed by ordinance for one year after the completion of the initial 120-acre annexation. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve (if acceptable) the Orderly Annexation Agreement that Castle Rock Township approved on July 24, 2006, and authorize City staff and the City Attorney to immediately prepare and circulate (for execution) the Joint Resolutions that would be required to finalize the annexations ofthe Olson and Mock properties. Alternatively, if the City Council determines that the version of the Orderly Annexation Agreement offered by Castle Rock Township is unacceptable, the Council may wish to direct staff and the City Attorney to proceed with the scheduling of the public hearing(s) that would be required to annex the Olson and Mock properties by ordinance. ReSP~(Ul1Y Submi;t~ )1/;/ I' ,/ //~e ~/ rivin Carroll "--~,- Community Development Director cc: Castle Rock Township Bryce Olson Terry and Linda Mock 4f)P~<VC-v 1~7 C c>l-t 1'1 elL eN C / 7-c, 6/:!Go JOINT RESOLUTION/ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BE1WEEN CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP AND THE CIlY OF FARMINGTON THIS ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT is entered into this _____ of _______________, 2006 by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP (hereinafter referred to as the "Township"). WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues 414.0325 authorizes townships and municipalities to provide for the orderly annexation of unincorporated areas that are in need of orderly annexation; and WHEREAS, the City and Township agree that there is a public need for the coordinated, efficient and cost-effective extension of the city services to promote the public health, well-being, and safety; and WHEREAS, the property described in attached Exhibit "A" (hereinafter referred to as the "Annexation Area") is about to become urban or suburban in nature and the City is capable of providing city services within a reasonable time; and WHEREAS, the extension of city services can only be provided in prioritized phases if the process and timing of annexation are clearly identified and jointly agreed upon in advance of the City's capital planning, commitment, and expenditure; and WHEREAS, the establishment of a process of orderly annexation of said lands will be of benefit to the residents and owners of said lands, and permit the City to extend necessary municipal services in a planned and efficient manner; and WHEREAS, the City and Township desire to accomplish the orderly annexation of the Annexation Area and the extension of municipal services in a mutually acceptable and beneficial manner without the need for a hearing before the Municipal Boundary Adjustments Unit [MBAU] of the Office of Administrative Hearings, or its successor, and with the purpose of avoiding annexation disputes, enter into this joint resolution for orderly annexation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.0325, subd. 1; and WHEREAS, a means is needed to control the development of these areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Farmington and Castle Rock Township that the two parties enter into this Joint Resolution Orderly Annexation Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") and agree to the following terms: ~ ~t-( 115/ -r A- Acreal!e and Location 1. The attached map entitled "Exhibit A - Annexation Area" shall be the framework for annexation from 2006 through 2016 (inclusive). The map constitutes the Annexation Area, and denotes areas from which annexation may occur under this agreement. It is not necessary that all of the land constituting the Annexation Area be annexed within the time period set forth in this agreement. 2. The lands included within the 2006 through 2016 Annexation Area are designated for future urban development within the City. The Township shall oppose any efforts to include any of the lands within the Annexation Area into any governmental jurisdiction other than the City. Annexation Area 3. The City shall have the right to annex land within the Annexation Area during the period from the date of this Agreement though December 31, 2016. The annexation pace shall be consistent with the requirements and standards set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, and zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. 4. Annexation will be limited to property that is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City. 5. All annexations shall be subject to the prevailing Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and subdivision regulations of the City. 6. The Township will not file any objection with the MBAU concerning the City's annexation of any land within the Annexation Area described above, so long as the annexation complies with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Comprehensive Plan and Zoninl! and Subdivision Rel!ulations: 7. The City will revise the present Comprehensive Plan, and zoning and subdivision regulations, to address areas to be annexed. 8. (a) Except as provided in Paragraph 8 (b) or 8 (c), the Planning Commission and/or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation or an initial zoning classification within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way the Comprehensive Plan designation or zoning classification within the Annexation Area, without providing the 2 Township with reasonable advance notice of (and a reasonable opportunity to comment on) any such adoption, modification, change or alteration. (b) With regard to any proposed industrial use, or any proposed commercial use of property that is not adjacent to State Highway 3, the Planning Commission and/or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation or an initial zoning classification within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way the Comprehensive Plan designation or zoning classification within the Annexation Area, without the consent of the Township Board, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld. (c) With regard to any proposed medium to high density residential use that is proposed to be constructed within 150' of the west property line of any Castle Rock Township residence that is located adjacent to Berring Avenue, the Planning Commission and/or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation or an initial zoning classification within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way the Comprehensive Plan designation or zoning classification within the Annexation Area, without the consent of the Township Board, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld. PlanninlZ and Land Use Control 9. Pursuant to MN Statute 414.0325, MN Statute 471.59, and Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes, the parties agree that the City shall have the authority to exercise planning, land use, zoning and subdivision authority within the Annexation Area. 10. If Dakota County objects to the City's zoning control over the Annexation Area, which is located outside of the incorporated area of the City, then the Township and the City shall each designate one person to serve on the three-person governing committee described in MN Statute 414.0325, subd. 5. The City shall designate the zoning administrator for the Annexation Area. Annexation Process 11. Annexations within the Annexation Area shall occur only if the owners of the properties located within the Annexation Area petition for annexation. 12. If the City intends to annex a parcel of property within the Annexation Area, the City shall, within 14 days of receipt of a petition to annex property within the Annexation Area, submit to the Township the following: 3 (A) The legal description and a map of the property proposed to be annexed; (B) A description of the proposed use of said property, if known by the City, and with the express understanding that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any such proposed use; Upon receipt of submittals set forth above, the Township will be provided 30 days to comment on the proposed annexation. 13. During the term of this Agreement, petitions for the annexation of areas located outside of the Annexation Area shall not be accepted, processed or approved by the City without the express written consent of the Castle Rock Board of Supervisors. This provision shall remain in effect through December 31, 2016 even if this Agreement terminates earlier than December 31, 2016 pursuant to Paragraph 27 hereof. Road Maintenance and Improvement; Transportation PlannillfZ; Road and Bridee Account 14. Road Maintenance Prior to Annexation. The Township shall continue its normal maintenance of existing Township roads, bridges, drainage facilities, and street signage for any property located within the Annexation Area until that property is annexed by the City. 15. Joint Maintenance/Improvement Expenses. The City and Township agree to develop a joint policy for sharing the cost of maintaining and improving Township roads that are adjacent to any property that is annexed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 16. Joint Transportation Planning. The City and the Township will work in cooperation with Dakota County, MnDOT and developers to assure that any new development within the Annexation Area properly addresses: (A) the transportation needs of the project; (B) projected impacts on City and/or Township roads, especially those that are likely to result in the need to make improvements or upgrades due to increased traffic and/or different types of usages; and (C) compliance with the transportation system set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 4 17. Road and Bridge Account. The Township shall create a new road and bridge account that is separate from its existing road and bridge account. Payments of the type referred to in Paragraph 19 below shall be deposited into the new account. The Township may transfer up to 7.5% of each such deposit into its general revenue fund, to be used for administrative expenses related to any aspect of this Agreement. Funds in the new road and bridge account shall be used exclusively for the following purposes: (a) Maintenance. The funds in question may be applied to increases in roadway maintenance costs that are reasonably attributable to development that occurs within any portion of the Annexation Area that is annexed by the City. (b) Improvements: The funds in question may be applied to the cost(s) of constructing, reconstructing, paving or otherwise improving Roadway Segments A, B, C or D, as identified on the attached Exhibit B. Any required improvements to Segment A must be completed before funds can be applied to the improvement of Segments B, C or D. Segment B must be completed before funds can be applied to the improvement of Segment C. The City's advance written consent shall be required for any anticipated expenditure in excess of $1000. Any unexpended funds that remain in the account upon the expiration of this Agreement shall be returned to the City unless the parties have mutually agreed in writing, prior to said expiration, that the funds may be retained by the Township so that they maybe applied to road and bridge costs attributable to any additional development that occurs within an area subject to any separate Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and the Township. Statutory Sharine of Tax Revenues 18. Property tax revenue generated by annexed properties shall be allocated between the City and the Township on the following basis: A) Ash Street Orderly Annexation Area: For any past or future annexations involving properties located within the Ash Street Orderly Annexation Area, property tax revenues related to commercial or industrial properties (only) will be shared by the City and the Township pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. Sec 414.035, subd. 12, as set forth below: Subd. 12. Property taxes. When a municipality annexes land under subdivision 2, clause (2), (3), or (4), property taxes payable on the annexed land shall continue to be paid to the affected town or towns for the year in which the 5 annexation becomes effective. If the annexation becomes effective on or before August 1 of a levy year, the municipality may levy on the annexed area beginning with that same levy year. If the annexation becomes effective after August 1 of a levy year, the town may continue to levy on the annexed area for that levy year, and the municipality may not levy on the annexed area until the following levy year. In the first year following the year when the municipality could first levy on the annexed area under this subdivision, and thereafter, property taxes on the annexed land shall be paid to the municipality. In the first year following the year the municipality could first levy on the annexed area, the municipality shall make a cash payment to the affected town or towns in an amount equal to 90 percent of the property taxes distributed to the town in regard to the annexed area in the last year the property taxes from the annexed area were payable to the town; in the second year, an amount equal to 70 percent; in the third year, an amount equal to 50 percent; in the fourth year, an amount equal to 30 percent; and in the fifth year, an amount equal to ten percent. The municipality and the affected township may agree to a different payment. Any past payments due to the Township pursuant to this paragraph 18(A) shall be calculated and paid as if this provision had been in effect as of the date of annexation. B) Future Annexations: For any future annexations that are completed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, property tax revenues related to properties located within the 2006-2016 Annexation Area shall be shared pursuant to Paragraph 19 of this Agreement. Tax Rebates to Castle Rock Township 19. Payments to Township. Upon annexation of any land per this Agreement, the Township shall not be entitled to receive tax revenue rebates from the City until such time as the property is developed or redeveloped. When development or redevelopment occurs, and the improved property is assessed in a manner that reflects the value of the completed development improvements, the Township shall begin to receive tax revenue rebates. The tax rebate received by the Township on any given developed or redeveloped parcel shall be equal to 50% of the amount of the City's share of the total property taxes paid on that parcel in the first tax year that reflects the full value of the completed initial improvements. Improvements shall be considered" completed" when the City issues a Certificate of Occupancy. The payments due to the Township pursuant to this Agreement will be made within 60 days of the City's receipt of the property tax revenue(s) in question, or within 60 days of receipt by the City of the annual accounting from the Township, whichever is later. 6 20. The Township will provide an annual accounting of the use of funds from the Road and Bridge Account referred to herein. If the City wishes to challenge the accounting, it may do so at its own expense. If there is an error in the Township's accounting, then the expense the City incurred to audit the Township's accounting will be paid through a reduction of funds owed to the Township pursuant to this Agreement. Dispute Resolution and Amendment 21. Disputes concerning this agreement shall be resolved as follows: (A) NEGOTIATION. When a disagreement over interpretation of any provision of this agreement occurs, the City and Township must meet at least once, at a mutually convenient time and place, to attempt to resolve the dispute through negotiation. (B) MEDIATION. If the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, claim or counterclaim, or are unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable interpretation of any provision of this agreement, the parties may mutually agree in writing to seek relief by submitting their respective grievances to non-binding mediation. (C) ADJUDICATION. When the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, claim or counterclaim, or are unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable interpretation of any provisions of this agreement, or are unable to agree to submit their respective grievances to non-binding mediation, then either party may seek relief through initiation of an action in a court of competent jurisdiction. In addition to the remedies provided for in this agreement and any other available remedies at law or equity, in the case of a violation, default or breach of any provision of this agreement, the non-violating, non-defaulting, non-breaching party may bring an action for specific performance to compel the performance of this agreement in accordance with its terms. If a court action is required, the court may reimburse the prevailing party for its reasonable attorney's fees and costs. General Terms and Provisions 22. This agreement may not be modified, amended or altered except upon the written joint resolution of the City and Township, duly executed and adopted by the City Council and Township Board of Supervisors, and filed with the MBAU. Either party to this agreement may request an amendment. Requests for amendments will first be considered by the Farmington Planning Commission. Its recommendation shall be 7 forwarded to the Township Board and the City Council. The City and Township agree to meet jointly on an annual basis to consider and discuss (a) the usage of Road and Bridge Account funds during the preceding twelve months and (b) possible modifications to this orderly Annexation Agreement. 23. The terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this agreement, including the present and all future attachments, shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties, superseding all prior agreements and negotiations regarding the Annexation Area (with the exception of any jointly approved roadway maintenance agreements between the City and the Township). There are no understandings, agreements or assumptions other than the written terms of this agreement. 24. This agreement shall be binding upon and benefit the respective successors and assigns of the City and Township. Specifically, this agreement is binding upon the governmental entity that survives or is created by any action on the part of the Township to merge, consolidate, detach, annex, reorganize or incorporate. 25. This agreement is made pursuant to, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event any provision of this agreement is determined or adjudged to be unconstitutional, invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 26. Upon the filing of this Agreement and resolution with the MBAU, the parties will not request any alteration of the boundaries of the land constituting the Annexation Area, or any change in the annexation of land not provided for in this agreement. The MBAU may review and comment on the annexation resolution, but may not otherwise consider the resolution or alter the Annexation Area boundaries. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of an annexation resolution adopted by the City, which complies with this Agreement, the MBAU must order the annexation of the area described in the annexation resolution in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. Termination of Orderly Annexation Al?reement 27. This agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2016, or the date upon which all permitted annexation of land in the Annexation Area has been completed, whichever occurs sooner. Notwithstanding the termination of this agreement, the following provisions shall remain 8 binding and enforceable after the termination of the agreement for all properties annexed under the terms of this agreement: (A) Paragraph 17 - Relating to dedicated use of tax rebate funds. Any funds in the Road and Bridge Account (Paragraph 17 hereof) shall remain available to the Township for the purposes referred to in Paragraph 17 until the later of: 1. December 31,2016, or 2. Two (s) years after the City Council's approval of the last annexation of property located within the Annexation Area that occurs prior to December 31, 2016. (B) Paragraph 19 - Relating to tax rebates; and (C) Paragraph 20 - Relating to annual accounting. Bindine Aereement. Director's Review 28. No alteration of the areas set forth herein for orderly annexation, or their boundaries is appropriate. The director may review and comment, but not alter the boundaries. 29. This Orderly Annexation Agreement designates certain areas as in need of orderly annexation, and provides the conditions for the annexation of those areas. The parties agree that no consideration by the director is necessary, and that therefore the director may review, and comment, but shall, within thirty (30) days of the submission of a petition for annexation in conformity with this Agreement, order annexation consistent with the terms of this Orderly Annexation Agreement, and Resolutions submitted pursuant thereto. 30. This Agreement is a binding contract, and provides the exclusive procedures by which the unincorporated property identified in the Agreement may be annexed to the City. The City shall not annex property within the Annexation Area by any other procedure. 9 ADOPTED BY THE CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE _____ DAY OF ______________,2006. A TIESTED TO: By: _________________________ Its: Board Chair By: ________________________________ Its: Town Clerk ADOPTED BY THE FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL ON THE ______________, 2006. DAY OF A TIESTED TO: By: _________________________ _______________, 11ayor By: ________________________________ ________________ City Administrator 10 vv'6L NOfnIll'3:d 'I a'IVNOa :.:::. ::.. ... II. . ;, ':,:',~ :'," : ' , -- Ca] . In ~ 0\0 II . "C:; 0 .~ CII"C:; ~ , O\Us i , '"C '"C ::> ~ ~ " . " 13's: .: b ~ 9 ~~ ~ ::E::E el '" o 00 OJ cr ]: .. ::; " 0; "&. ::> " .. ii: 5 ~ 0. .. ::; .1 ~ . "1 ," . .,' " ", I '.' '. ....... ~J:)V S9"9L NOfnI'3:.L'3:d 'I a'IVNOa l-.;"'-' .',' ..; 1 .. I/) t .:~ K:_,:_.:_;.:'~ I ~.:...:::J ~ ;;:r= D ~ i~ ~ fYI[Jj ~I"" ~~ ~ =~~~ II ~~~ ~ qc ~~8M8 ~ ~ 6hta Earfi3 EihEa ~ ~ ~"" ~ ;:::c ~ = I II I I ~~~ ~"'~ ~tiUd M E ~ DJTIJ ~~ j::: ~ ITIIJ DJTIJ ~ w:J:1/ ~~-.II .~! J. ~crll I 1111CD111111nT:J~1// F-~ , I I I I CiIIJ I I~ III []J]:j ~-{-Bf,\ J ~E~~l I' b- If-~~ \1 I nn H H IW ,\ll~ ~t= =~~= DI - [[]I] =1--1 f-f- :J ~ I ~- m ~ ~~ ~ ~= ~- ffirnrro W J DO ~~ OIIIIIJIJ OJ]] tl1:~ .~~ ffiffiHEHr:ffiHffiHHHE ~~tffiffi mw I -- I = - - - -\ z ~iil Is [ I '" c:; ~ != . , , , , en , Q) , ~ L() 0 II . ... . .1 II' ,I . t. , , . L() N c:i L() N ...... c:i . .. . . .' . . . I . ..... . o I . I. s:: o .... bO s:: Q .... z ~ ~ ~ ~'O ~ .0 ~ D D . ~D D ~ Q.) ~ \0< :.a ... s:: en >. 0 0 ~ r:: ~ CII .... ~ ~ f; ..0 1il E-< 1-<<; o~ ~ 0 s:: 0 s:: C,) .... 0 s:: CII l:i o Q.).....c;; '"C <: ~ ~1il-a~..Q ~ ~~'"C o~ tl ..d ~ g @''E 8 <<:ti:: ~o - - . . , ' .' =1m~ ~ . :: . , . . , . -I -I -= J I I ~ -::::: -= :- -- E~ n z+ '. \. ) o 3A V 3LL3NNV ~~ ~d ~~ ~ 0>- ~< <~ ~~ o ~ ~ Q ~ ~ is o ~ u I ~ N ~ 01 ...... \0 t-.. ~ ~ ~ ~C'l1 II II II II I < ~ u 01 I 1111 i l_____.J 3A V A3'NOnV V ON}(3A1.V 3: g E-< ~ ~ ~ is o ~ '" It) "" QU) ~ 00 l>: ~~ ~ ~ It) " "0"0 2l ~.~ ~~ Q) > ~. r o l!?l 'I a. c. nlnl~4 :!: :!: .. ::;: i o .t I!l (j :( ~ ...- ::./ . .- Q) Q) u.. ~~) m.?/.J4vc.---i~ ~y c/f ...f"'7 {~. /2A/ elL -r c l-V- r..I -.5: if-, pc"; 1/ :? '-1/ (;J (p JOINT RESOLUTION/ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP AND THE CITI OF FARMINGTON THIS ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT is entered into this _____ of _______________, 2006 by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP (hereinafter referred to as the "Township"). WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues 414.0325 authorizes townships and municipalities to provide for the orderly annexation of unincorporated areas that are in need of orderly annexation; and WHEREAS, the City and Township agree that there is a public need for the coordinated, efficient and cost-effective extension of sewer and water services to promote economic growth and development, and provide for the efficient delivery of desired or required public services; and WHEREAS, the property described in attached Exhibit "A" (hereinafter referred to as the "Annexation Area") is about to become urban or suburban in nature and the City is capable of providing sewer, water, and other public services within a reasonable time; and WHEREAS, the extension of sewer, water, and other public services can only be provided in prioritized phases if the process and timing of service requirements are clearly identified and jointly agreed upon in advance of the City's capital planning, commitment, and expenditure; and WHEREAS, the establishment of a process of orderly annexation of said lands may be of benefit to the residents and owners of said lands, and permit the City to extend municipal services in a planned and efficient manner; and WHEREAS, the City and Township desire to accomplish the orderly annexation of the Annexation Area and the extension of municipal services in a mutually acceptable and beneficial manner without the need for a hearing before the Municipal Boundary Adjustments Unit [MBAU] of the Office of Administrative Hearings, or its successor, and with the purpose of avoiding annexation disputes, enter into this joint resolution for orderly annexation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.0325, subd. 1; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Farmington and Castle Rock Township that the two parties enter into this Joint Resolution Orderly Annexation Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") and agree to the following terms: ~><J./ I (1./ 7 lS Acreaee and Location 1. The attached map entitled "Exhibit A - Annexation Area" shall be the framework for annexation from 2006 through 2016 (inclusive). The map constitutes the Annexation Area, and denotes areas from which annexation may occur under this agreement. It is not necessary that all of the land constituting the Annexation Area be annexed within the time period set forth in this agreement. 2. The lands included within the 2006 through 2016 Annexation Area are designated for future urban development within the City. The Township shall oppose any efforts to include any of the lands within the Annexation Area into any governmental jurisdiction other than the City. Annexation Area 3. The City shall have the right to annex land within the Annexation Area during the period from the date of this Agreement though December 31, 2016. The annexation pace shall be consistent with the requirements and standards set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, and zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. 4. Annexation will be limited to property that is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City. 5. All annexations shall be subject to the prevailing Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and subdivision regulations of the City. 6. The Township will not file any objection with the MBAU concerning the City's annexation of any land within the Annexation Area described above, so long as the annexation complies with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Comprehensive Plan and Zonine and Subdivision Reeulations: 7. The City will revise its Comprehensive Plan to address properties located within the Annexation Area. 8. (a) Except as provided in Paragraph 8 (b) or 8 (c), the Planning Commission and/ or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation for any property located within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way that initial Comprehensive Plan designation, without providing the Township with reasonable advance notice of (and a Save Date: 7/27/2006 12:05:00 PM 2 reasonable opportunity to comment on) any such adoption, modification, change or alteration. (b) With regard to any proposed industrial or commercial use of property, the Planning Commission and/or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation for any property located within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way that initial Comprehensive Plan designation, without the consent of the Township Board, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld. (c) With regard to any proposed medium to high density residential, industrial, or commercial use that is proposed to be constructed within 150' of the west property line of any Castle Rock Township residence that is located adjacent to Berring Avenue, the Planning Commission and/or the City Council of the City of Farmington shall not adopt an initial Comprehensive Plan designation for any property located within the Annexation Area, or subsequently modify, change, or alter in any way that initial Comprehensive Plan designation, without the consent of the Township Board, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld. (d) With regard to any future development proposed to be constructed along the west property line of any Castle Rock Township residence that is located adjacent to Berring Avenue, the City will not obtain or require any permanent easements or rights-of- way from the owners of the Berring Avenue properties in question. Plannine and Land Use Control 9. Pursuant to MN Statute 414.0325, MN Statute 471.59, and Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes, the parties agree that the City shall have the authority to exercise planning, land use, zoning and subdivision authority within the Annexation Area. Prior to the actual annexation of a parcel of property located within the Annexation Area, the City's exercise of such authority shall be limited to adopting a Comprehensive Plan designation for that parcel, which will not affect the parcels land use unless and until the annexation is complete. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the City and the Township, the zoning and use(s) of a parcel located within the Annexation Area, and the construction or modification of structures located thereon, shall be controlled by the Township's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, regulations and procedures until the annexation of that parcel has been completed. 10. Intentionally omitted and reserved for future use. Save Date: 7/27/2006 12:05:00 PM 3 Annexation Process 11. Annexations within the Annexation Area shall occur only if the owners of the properties located within the Annexation Area petition for annexation. 12. If the City intends to annex a parcel of property within the Annexation Area, the City shall, within 14 days of receipt of a petition to annex property within the Annexation Area, submit to the Township the following: (A) The legal description and a map of the property proposed to be annexed; (B) A description of the proposed use of said property, if known by the City, and with the express understanding that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any such proposed use; Upon receipt of submittals set forth above, the Township will be provided 30 days to comment on the proposed annexation. 13. During the term of this Agreement, petitions for the annexation of areas located outside of the Annexation Area shall not be accepted, processed or approved by the City without the express written consent of the Castle Rock Board of Supervisors. This provision shall remain in effect through December 31, 2016 even if this Agreement terminates earlier than December 31, 2016 pursuant to Paragraph 27 hereof. Road Maintenance and Improvement; Transportation Plannin2; Road and Brid2e Account 14. Road Maintenance Prior to Annexation. The Township shall continue its normal maintenance of existing Township roads, bridges, drainage facilities, and street signage for any property located within the Annexation Area until that property is annexed by the City. 15. Joint Maintenance/Improvement Expenses. The City and Township agree to develop a joint policy for sharing the cost of maintaining and improving Township roads that are adjacent to any property that is annexed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 16. Toint Transportation Planning. The City and the Township will work in cooperation with Dakota County, MnDOT and developers to assure that any new development within the Annexation Area properly addresses: Save Date: 7/2712006 12:05:00 PM 4 (A) the transportation needs of the project; (B) projected impacts on City and/or Township roads, especially those that are likely to result in the need to make improvements or upgrades due to increased traffic and/or different types of usages; and (C) compliance with the transportation system set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 17. Road and Bridge Account. The Township shall create a new road and bridge account that is separate from its existing road and bridge account. Payments of the type referred to in Paragraph 19 below shall be deposited into the new account. The Township may transfer up to 15% of each such deposit into its general revenue fund. Funds in the new road and bridge account shall be used exclusively for the following purposes: (a) Maintenance: The funds in question may be applied to roadway maintenance costs on Roadway Segments A, B, CorD, as identified on the attached Exhibit B, and on Berring Avenue and 230th Street. (b) Improvements: The funds in question may be applied to the cost(s) of constructing, reconstructing, paving or otherwise improving Roadway Segments A, B, C or D, as identified on the attached Exhibit B, and 230th Street. The Township's engineer shall discuss any proposed or anticipated expenditure in excess of $1000 with the City's Public Works Director prior to the authorization or commencement of the work in question. Any funds that remain in the account upon the expiration of this Agreement shall be returned to the City unless the parties have mutually agreed in writing, prior to said expiration, that those funds may be retained by the Township for other costs attributable to any additional development that occurs within an area subject to any separate Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and the Township. Statutory Sharin2 of Tax Revenues 18. Property tax revenue generated by annexed properties shall be allocated between the City and the Township on the following basis: A) Ash Street Orderly Annexation Area: For any past or future annexations involving properties located within the Ash Street Orderly Annexation Area, property tax revenues related to commercial or industrial properties (only) will be shared by the Save Date: 7/27/2006 12:05:00 PM 5 City and the Township pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. Sec 414.035, subd. 12, as set forth below: Subd. 12. Property taxes. When a municipality annexes land under subdivision 2, clause (2), (3), or (4), property taxes payable on the annexed land shall continue to be paid to the affected town or towns for the year in which the annexation becomes effective. If the annexation becomes effective on or before August 1 of a levy year, the municipality may levy on the annexed area beginning with that same levy year. If the annexation becomes effective after August 1 of a levy year, the town may continue to levy on the annexed area for that levy year, and the municipality may not levy on the annexed area until the following levy year. In the first year following the year when the municipality could first levy on the annexed area under this subdivision, and thereafter, property taxes on the annexed land shall be paid to the municipality. In the first year following the year the municipality could first levy on the annexed area, the municipality shall make a cash payment to the affected town or towns in an amount equal to 90 percent of the property taxes distributed to the town in regard to the annexed area in the last year the property taxes from the annexed area were payable to the town; in the second year, an amount equal to 70 percent; in the third year, an amount equal to 50 percent; in the fourth year, an amount equal to 30 percent; and in the fifth year, an amount equal to ten percent. The municipality and the affected township may agree to a different payment. Any past payments due to the Township pursuant to this Paragraph 18(A) shall be calculated and paid as if this provision had been in effect as of the date of annexation. B) Future Annexations: For any future annexations that are completed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, property tax revenues related to properties located within the 2006-2016 Annexation Area shall be shared pursuant to Paragraph 19 of this Agreement. Tax Rebates to Castle Rock Township 19. Payments to Township. Upon annexation of any land per this Agreement, the Township shall not be entitled to receive tax revenue rebates from the City until such time as the property is developed or redeveloped. When development or redevelopment occurs, and the improved property is assessed in a manner that reflects the value of the completed development improvements, the Township shall begin to receive tax revenue rebates. The tax rebate received by the Township on any given developed or redeveloped residential parcel shall be equal to 50% of the amount of the City's share of the total property taxes paid on that parcel in the first tax year that reflects the full value of the completed initial improvements. Improvements shall be considered" completed" when the City issues a Certificate of Occupancy. Save Date: 7/27/2006 12:05:00 PM 6 The payments due to the Township pursuant to this Agreement will be made within 60 days of the City's receipt of the property tax revenue(s) in question, or within 60 days of receipt by the City of the annual accounting from the Township, whichever is later. 20. The Township will provide an annual accounting of the use of funds from the Road and Bridge Account referred to herein. If the City wishes to challenge the accounting, it may do so at its own expense. If there is an error in the Township's accounting the error will be corrected by the proper jurisdiction. If the error is in the Townships favor, Yz the expense the City incurred to audit the Township's accounting will be paid through a reduction of funds owed to the Township pursuant to this Agreement. Dispute Resolution and Amendment 21. Disputes concerning this agreement shall be resolved as follows: (A) NEGOTIATION. When a disagreement over interpretation of any provision of this agreement occurs, the City and Township must meet at least once, at a mutually convenient time and place, to attempt to resolve the dispute through negotiation. (B) MEDIATION. If the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, claim or counterclaim, or are unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable interpretation of any provision of this agreement, the parties may mutually agree in writing to seek relief by submitting their respective grievances to non-binding mediation. (C) ADJUDICATION. When the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, claim or counterclaim, or are unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable interpretation of any provisions of this agreement, or are unable to agree to submit their respective grievances to non-binding mediation, then either party may seek relief through initiation of an action in a court of competent jurisdiction. In addition to the remedies provided for in this agreement and any other available remedies at law or equity, in the case of a violation, default or breach of any provision of this agreement, the non-violating, non-defaulting, non-breaching party may bring an action for specific performance to compel the performance of this agreement in accordance with its terms. If a court action is required, the court may reimburse the prevailing party for its reasonable attorney's fees and costs. General Terms and Provisions Save Date: 7/27/2006 12:05:00 PM 7 22. This agreement may not be modified, amended or altered except upon the written joint resolution of the City and Township, duly executed and adopted by the City Council and Township Board of Supervisors, and filed with the MBAU. Either party to this agreement may request an amendment. Requests for amendments will first be considered by each jurisdiction's Planning Commission. Their recommendations shall be forwarded to the Township Board and the City Council. The City and Township agree to meet jointly on an annual basis to consider and discuss (a) the usage of Road and Bridge Account funds during the preceding twelve months and (b) possible modifications to this orderly Annexation Agreement. 23. The terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this agreement, including the present and all future attachments, shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties, superseding all prior agreements and negotiations regarding the Annexation Area (with the exception of any jointly approved roadway maintenance agreements between the City and the Township). There are no understandings, agreements or assumptions other than the written terms of this agreement. 24. This agreement shall be binding upon and benefit the respective successors and assigns of the City and Township. Specifically, this agreement is binding upon the governmental entity that survives or is created by any action on the part of the Township to merge, consolidate, detach, annex, reorganize or incorporate. 25. This agreement is made pursuant to, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event any provision of this agreement is determined or adjudged to be unconstitutional, invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 26. Upon the filing of this Agreement and resolution with the MBAU, the parties will not request any alteration of the boundaries of the land constituting the Annexation Area, or any change in the annexation of land not provided for in this agreement. The MBAU may review and comment on the annexation resolution, but may not otherwise consider the resolution or alter the Annexation Area boundaries. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of an annexation resolution adopted by the City, which complies with this Agreement, the MBAU must order the annexation of the area described in the annexation resolution in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. Save Date: 7/27/2006 12:05:00 PM 8 Termination of Orderly Annexation Aereement 27. This agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2016, or the date upon which all permitted annexation of land in the Annexation Area has been completed, whichever occurs sooner. Notwithstanding the termination of this agreement, the following provisions shall remain binding and enforceable after the termination of the agreement for all properties annexed under the terms of this agreement: (A) Paragraph 17 - Relating to use of tax rebate funds. Any funds in the Road and Bridge Account (Paragraph 17 hereof) shall remain available to the Township for the purposes referred to in Paragraph 17 until the later of: 1. December 31,2016, or 2. Two (s) years after the City Council's approval of the last annexation of property located within the Annexation Area that occurs prior to December 31,2016. (B) Paragraph 19 - Relating to tax rebates; and (C) Paragraph 20 - Relating to annual accounting. Bindine Aereement. Director's Review 28. No alteration of the areas set forth herein for orderly annexation, or their boundaries is appropriate. The director may review and comment, but not alter the boundaries. 29. This Orderly Annexation Agreement designates certain areas as eligible for orderly annexation, and provides the conditions for the annexation of those areas. The parties agree that no consideration by the director is necessary, and that therefore the director may review, and comment, but shall, within thirty (30) days of the submission of a petition for annexation in conformity with this Agreement, order annexation consistent with the terms of this Orderly Annexation Agreement, and Resolutions submitted pursuant thereto. 30. This Agreement is a binding contract, and provides the exclusive procedures by which the unincorporated property identified in the Agreement may be annexed to the City. The City shall not annex property within the Annexation Area by any other procedure. Save Date: 7/27/2006 12:05:00 PM 9 ADOPTED BY THE CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE _____ DAY OF ______________,2006. A TIESTED TO: By: _________________________ Its: Board Chair By: ________________________________ Its: Town Clerk ADOPTED BY THE FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL ON THE ______________,2006. DAY OF A TIESTED TO: By: _________________________ _______________, 11ayor By: ________________________________ ________________ City Administrator Save Date: 7/27/2006 12:05:00 PM 10 . - = Q,) e Q,) Q,) J. ~ -< = Q .... - = ~ Q,) = = -< ~ - J. . c.. Q fI.l = Q .... fI.l J. Q,) > c- .... -= fI.l = ~ Q E-4 "0 = = c .... u c.. Q = Q fI.l .... J. = c- e fi .- \C o - It} N - r--- "0 Q,) J. = C- Q,) J. ~ <+-< 0'0 :: c: = o e'il ~ <Ii .tii ..... .... <>> 5 ~ ~.y 8~s.~E -~Q.,i:.~ ~ : = ~ <Il N . - <Il Y -~~Y:= f"..s::t:="Q ~~'O.cs.. "'0'0= c.,=. = ... .... "0 e'il '0 ~ 1 ~~.~ ~ ~01S='O o~e~~ ~=,C)J)...... o...~ ~ ~ .c~='Oe'il 'C .~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ g.= ....- .. li) y <Il ~ e ;s ~ ~ ~ ...... Q) Ct-4 <Il ~ -0 Q eLl <;ss c: W)~o~:.a t:I ~_ a ;.. .- OO!l :=;.. .... ~ .s ~ e .~ 0.. tIl '0 0.. .. .- Q) - <+-< o ~.o ~ 0 ... c: ~.- ~ ~ ~ li) ~ :c < 0 tIllj;;i ~ <t-<t~g. o ] ~ ~ .~ o ~ 0 .-1 co;,.- Ue'il~U Q) '0 ~ ;s t.~ ;s : ~ = : . ~... . ~ rIJ ~ I-<.cf ..s::: \C"Oe'il c:> Q) ~ -~-= It') c: y N,,:= ~ .::: "Q :: --= g1~ ~ ~-= 0 - .~ B Q) o tIl S C [ U o eLl o ~ c: ... ~ Q) :.a ~.o '> < ~ ~ [ W) .- tIl <+-< t:I~c::. 0 o !=._ ~ .;; ~ u ~ :c .> 0 <+-< ~ ~ ot-<O<llg. ... "0 c: '0 0 ~ C:.9 = tIl ~ tIl e'il .- ~ .e .@ Cl .e O U ><:.~ U Q)~"Q~ ;s . ,..s:: : ~ ~: ::';s ~ ::' tIl cO ~ ; li) ~~~ <+-< ~ 8 "0 C'f') ~o ~ > <+-< Q) 0 = ~ 0 tIl~ II') C:Q ......~:>.... ~ ~ 8 5 8' ~ ~.5 Q) l"l .~ S 0...- ;.=, oS ~ ~ ><: go g ~ i'~ j o = g ~ to .s ''0 ~ ~ a ~ ta ~ !5 r::.il ~ ~ Q) 0 >.~ "0 ~ Q) :a I 0 .DeLl _~.~ ~~ if-'04 >. c: li): ..s:: =" '~= ~ ~ 's "E ~::: ~ ~ --log o ._ 0 ~ e .-...... - ~ 0, ~ ...... <+-<......... l:l 0' ~l""4> ta "0 0 ~ c: tIl c: ::=, J ' (I) o c: 0 0 =' tIl~'Qi '+:l tIl ~ ~ "0 0 "2 .:: s .s rn Q) tIl ~ c: 0 .- ~" 1 ue'il . o~ ~ g ~.; "0 ;s '1' ..... o I-<~Q) Q) ~ o 0..C:"O tIl S( S tIl a ~ ~ ~ 8. i,&' 0'Ct-4 c ~ ~.- c: e e a Q '0 ;s ~ ...... ~ .~ 0.. e Co rn g <+-< <+-< ~ c: - >.' .,.,.'. ;;;t ~ '~.d s.s ~ ta '0 ~ ta rg ~i otll~..s:: Q) O~,O~ .- ~ I.;< .~ .s s ...... tIl'.. ~ ';;' tIl ..s:: .. -...... ~ "0 =' '''0 s:..., 5 0.. r:: ~ I.;< ~~. ~ .... ~ 'I it olt: .g, ~ "'0 Q) +.;:i C1.) '" tI'J ~...... "....... .. . U} ><:Q)"OtIlc:~~eLlo ~, 4)~ ~ N'- Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ I-< ,.~ '+3 '~ u 0 ~ .- Q).D I-< ~ Q) L .g is = "', ~ .1:: - ..s:: <+-< ~ ~ ;s s roS :> 4) Q., ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 :::= tIl .- S I'... ~:g 0, : '1: ~ : ~ :::: ~ ~ o'~ <Il ~' ~ '':7. :: 0..0::.D::;s:: 0:: e-5!c s:: .- "0 Q) "0>. .~ - o ~ I-< Q) o.'U Q) Q) .D ~ .Q<Il 8= ta a o ~ (J) .: 8 = .~ t" c: tIl ~ 0 CJ .~ .~ :=;.. ><: "Q!:'l ~ =;;; c: Q.,<+-< ta ... 0 >. ~ eLl i: '::l.S ~ QS "E '0 .- 0 =...... <+-< e'il "0 0 ... ta tIl ~ tIl ~ e'il tIl 0 ~ 8 e ~O 0.. t a ~ ~ ~~ <+-<~. ~..s:: o. rIJ..... c~ <+-<~ ~~ o tIl s!= 8 ~ ..s:: ~ ._ ~ tIl 0 ~.g,::.~"2 B"O :;g~ ~~"2~~~ ~ '.:;:3 I.;< ~ c: B ;s '1: '.:;:3 ;s ~ ~ . 0 c: .'_ Q) : '1: ~ : ~ r'\ ::: p..._::: .... c., ~ ;s .s ...... I.;< Q) s:: Q) .D <+-< o Q) .D ~ S tIl tIl ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ t')~~~ tIl tIl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~---- <r)~\c~~ :: ~ 8 .~~ - (I) ~'+:l ~ ~. ~u ::s :>. ':2" fa .c <+-< '... 0 ~ u ~] 8 t" ... , o :;s. lit; fa ~ '0 .a~ i~ ,11:1"0 r ~ II') '0.... ....~ ~. ...' 1"~ 8.] o g ~ .... ~. 0.. . :>. <Il' 8 fa 5 ,C= o 'U o "0 - (1).- "O.D~ ~ 0 "'.. Of),- 0..' u "0 .- '"':~~ -s8.~ ,~ e 0 .:: t:l..-f-o ~ U 0. o .... 0.. <+-< o u tIl =' ~ .~ u S S o o .... o ~ '.E tIl =' "0 .5 "0 Q) tIl o C. o ... 0.. >. 1a o ...... "0 ~ eLl U ... ..s:: .... ~ :: ---- s '00 J I,. < .:. .a ~ , U',-' _r l'IJ.... =... l:ill ... ~ ' e ," ~ ~ = G>lJS ;=1: u~. ~ .... 1a. = = Ii ::;.'~{g. ~ '~' ~ ~ s li -: ~~ i a- &... o~.ot'la~.~ ~ u' 0\ ~: :>. ~ :'~"I:: g t..... .~ i Q i J e ..s:: ::e'il=':S ~o~ e-= .liiI=....~ g. I" oS' .' ~ I' ~ j.~u. =::a ~:<-=_~; 8 BOO ;,1 6b 1.= > ~;.. ~.... ~ ~ _ = '"' y 8 .!::l. ..... j:l. ,,", ~ ,Q ~' .. ~ ~ . 1 .... =,i:i~ ]!u(l)~=,...r..!S~~~l'IJ ~ .I: ~' go U I{) oS oS -;., 8 ~ ,:a '0 :a ~ ~ s~~.a "O~\5~.=~;=b~~ .s ~ - t: ; J!'~ - ~-=<.. ~ ~ -! 1 ~ ,1:a~.; ~ ~=:.~. ~.g .~;',~ t ~ t'l s Ii. W) :! ~ ....; -! 0 &~ ~ =\,~~. <Ill: ~ ... ~ .5_ ,e =. ~ Ct-4 ~:>.'C: e, ! ~ !', ~ ~ .i ~ ~ ~ .... 0 .~. ~ ~ w -- - '= -= ... u .~ i ~ li 5 ~ ~ '?j 'S '5 g i ~ :r~ a = e s~S~ 8~"'~,:S~~b~=C)J)! >. , ~.~.,:~' ~ fA._ :~. ~ cS '=-'. = U a I.~.Q. .D .2 ~, C ~ 'Z',s..<Il. ~ J!f'g ~. -< ~.~ j ] : ~;~~' :e ;:s, ~ ;8>' :-.=, Ii '...~, .I '5 N _' ~ ~ - ~." ~ 14:) e '= I' - .. '0 ... ~ s:: ,~,l:~.. ., 'S' II') 'k,' Ct-4 .., j" ..... (I" ,e Y d .. - 'N ,00 ::l = -', ,. ,.c ~ ....= r. ~ f .o.~ Q t') '" <Il =, ,'~ ,'1a' u'~ lit ,,_ . - ~ l::I >. .. cb 0 rn"t:l 0 ~'~ = = ,u.... &:Ii Q) a =;.... :!:e ;1:'''. ~ ~;=.;.g 't - '5 .... 'S ~; -.t a ~ a ~.; =:' ~ -a Ii~;.e :00 = ~ ;.. eo!. ~ ~ .~' s.- ,=,." ,'~ a','~ ,Ct-4r ;;;: · = -< Q a .s; ';; J' '~.f~' .51' " t i. ~ e s :=' u,rJJ S .....' ~ -, = Q'e, .. = c. '1:2 '~~51' i ',oo!~':;~ '4f a~L(; s: i' S'.~ .B ~ --,'t, b.c 1f~ a 3 -e '~ s,'~!! 8 Ct-4 = = "0 0 &\ 8"',,!.... ~ 8 ]:~ <-&:.,~~ ;, ~" : ~ ~ ~ .g f ...~'o = ,..s,oo to ,~ =, ," ~.' ~ o..rIJ = S::.Q ~ ~.... .:l ::' ;g -_. .:el,l ,=. ~. ~ ~ . I Q) r,~'~' 1; i ~s '8" 6 ~ ,bI);~' i ~~=r.s,.~ '; ~.5 ~ J "2 ] ij, 0 J ., EI U" ~ ;::: _ f _ ~ = - .... >oJ ~.'~Ii'~~ ~~t~~i. ~~ ~s ~ ~, ~ ;' :;I1!6::" -":F. t:! '0 IE! oS. l'IJ Os ~ = 8 S --,GIt-~.:: Q;... <Ill: e'il" 0 = t';" = ..........- ~ ~ x \u ., .s ~ .' ...... :i.,- ~ .s t ~.<" ~o:<i g "0 5 ,It'} Q ;"~ r...... QS........ <<Sl ,t-- <Il ~ ~ ~ 4;) 'Of) ... '~l'l~ so....~ 00 oS Q., '+J ,I~. 4) ~ ... uf 0';' , :B'- i~~'~'~ , t') 00 U a-., I~ .s-:t:: I~'~ ~~ IS S';~, m ,.a .!3 .;it 5 ~s ::?4' ~ ';i ,00 .s .s :> I~~ ~~ .sN~<Il ~..c::"'C!:l 11'h],~ I~ ~.~'9 :: ~IU 2 ... Q) ;.. o "0 l:l s:: I-< 8 ..seLl .... c: o .- .... c: ~ 0 l:l N .~ en s:: ~ ~g ~ 0 eLl...... s:: tIl .- ...... s:: ~ ~:.E' Q) 0 ~o ShC: '00 g Q)U "O<+-< 0'- ...... ~ OU s< o c: u .9 S~ 0><:.......... ~ ~ ~ ~ c: u ~ c: 1::1 .........<<1:; :a- ~ ')0;; Q'I ,i"~-- -.-- "" ., ~ ,I,," t.. . I ~ I.!IS 5 ~ 15 1:~ ~."~ "2 : a:ii .... 0 .0.... .~ 5 <<I.t: 5 Q. .... ] 0 8..~ 0'0 8..CI.l >>~ "tll 0 ;I<<I,~::' <I),~ . ~<~.1S ~ ::0. ~ ;a~' g ::::<1)0" .!'"~.S .<I)....~ ....u 6 8 Q) ~ 1=: ..J:l ":> 'Q ~ Q) tlloS-S Q) .~ Ct-4 <I) ~ 0 ~ 0.... .2<0. 1=: .c:OQ) <I)..... a !;l~ G ~ lI+-o 0 o 0 C r...... II:) ....~ m . ,p,Q), Q) "' o. . )ol!' 0 ~ Q) 0 :0,.;;" ".'-T'-- , ,;. ~ ~ ...~ . U '..;; ~ ;l'.~;"'lo:S <0(. ..:,~ ;;""', ~I' :,<';'"= ..... 0 ~ .~,.""'c~9.'1 , "I'+'> .~ ... p"~ ~t j 5 cS ,;;~IC ,.r~~ Q) ~ tii 6 ~ -',,' . ."',Q)~, ,',~ l,' ';,e. ~f/.l. ~ :i:! ~ Q) .lo:El~~i' ~ .s..... e.. 0 .!:l .~~ . ') , ;~; ~. j ~' ~ r ~:~ .. ,'.~' ~~:~, i.{3 .;; Q) '~ai:'~ ~ i '~,oS '::~' .~co, 0 <<I Q) $a at g ~..~.;",., t ~ l:(,l, .a ,ft.~'-"ft 1';Jl1i . ~ fJ) ~ ~~=-, c lQ ;,:;: = Ct-4 -' '<<I"'E: ~o ~ _! ~'1 .~ '0 <<I 1=: ~ , ~:$ '5 ~.U Q) g 8 . :1 fl~i ,~~ ::J.~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~.... ~!">- ....~> ~~. 8 ~ ,~,'~] lZl 0 ~. ~ ;~... :~ Q) Ct-4'" > ~ ,-...Q"'" co cS "tj ", " ...;..:..:..a e. = Q) ::' <<t Q) , Q,,_ 'jC! I::: Q)..Q . <I) ;~I bO~ '8 13 'i ~~] 19t~'~] ~'.~ I ~ ~.m. .~~)t.~~, ~d!~~,.o t) ~il IS'f~"8: .! ~,. er~!a, -(jj ,rJ,f!r ~.' '4".:...J .: 1 r-- ..... Q) ..Q ..... ~ 11) ~..Q ..... >.. c ~ S s 11) (/) 11)'"0_ Sb 8 ~ .......<i::8 ...... ~'.z;::l ell (I) "1""""4 ;.s='"O .....,J:l'"O Ct-4-~ o 1;:j >.. c..r::: S 0........ '.z;::l : 0 e -d ~ 1"1""""4 Q)__ ~~~ 11)~.E ..r::: ..~ ..... . 11) 8 ~ ~ e-..r::: .l!3 ... (/) (/) ..... 11) 0 s.... 0 o ~ .... o Q.,8 (11)- ~..r::: = 11) ..... ... ..9~.s c 11) ...."2 p.. c~;.s .... (/) e : ~ ~.f' 0 ..... U E-< :: ~ 11) 11) : ..9..r:::..r:::...... ..... ..... c (/) 0 >.. 11) -g.......Qs :::s '"0 '"0 p.. q;;;, 11) 11) 0 2 E .S Q) <::B;S> :: ~ ~.g : $ '1~ ,g;s ~~ -8 ~ ~..r::: .... <I) o <I) ,'t:l ~ 8,.- oU 'Q) Q) . :> oS Q)Cj;., "tj 0:: C . Q) ~ : .~ 0 ~ >>~>> aQ)~ ,s~ ~ Q.O.;E :E*Q) ~~,g o o.s 'f-< .... - ~, 8 Q) ~ la ~ g' 'Q. ..Qq,)1;:j "2::'05 > - 1=: ....J! 0 8{/)"tj ~ Q)'; Q)~p.. 1;:j Q. ~ -e,;~ ., .!,:.! e .c:.... &. ~ .r: e :: ... Q. .0 ~:>. bO b ~ .~. Ct-4 .13 ~o "Eo $'u 0 ~ 'dQ)= ~j:Q ... lUOSO....... .s i~'g ~:~ ~ a "tj i= ~ ~.. "p..p ~ ...., ... ~ - 0 == .8 Q) c:l .... E-< ~ ~.s'~.s ~ ~~e .:'0 ~ ......OS.cl.... ~ g 5 '.:: CJ"tj tU ,43~.~ ~; :!.-E .~S ~ l+=i Q. Q)8 >>tU ~(/) ..Q~ 11) . cO~S-~ 8 "2 cS 0 1=:..r::: -.... ~ '.z;::l Ia'[i <:: 4L8 ~ 5~bO<I),'.;j- 6b o o.s:S' g!:l':! 'U; .~E-<_ (/) 11) ~Q)!3$aQ){/) '"0 ~<I) oS 0 ":' .p 15 :: 'E .S-.S g' ~ E'.z;::l . ~ S .;;.~ (/) ~ t+:: .a c 11) ~ ~. ~e- s j ~ ~ ~ ~u~~J!la 1;:j<:: G;)11)~<I)1=:O .g8 oS oS o,~ ,. Q) g ~ ....,;:: .S ::= ~ 0 ~ ....., d ~ ~ .... "';..J:lE-< ~.~ C), Ct-4 ~ o 5 ~ Q)'" ,.cl !3' 0 1=: ,: 5 .i:2 ::= .-51 f ~1 E-'I 0 ~ <:: , 0..... 0 U ~ Cl;a~....s' ~.o~: <<I{/)<<I"tj~1=: 0.... (/)'C o.~ M.9.-..... ~ C .... ~..... .... "fii (/) U' ... 0 ~ '~"2 ~ g'~ Q) 'E 0 .~ oS i5. ~ ~ 0" e oS ..!l! .~ ~ ~ e 0 !3 ~ '0 ""C!) ~ ~ S :: Q..S <i:::: U a:: :: ~ 11) 't:l ::. .p.. .,..8 ~ 11) ..Q ~: Q) 1=: G1)~ ":S' ~ oS >.....'E '>50 Q)'B~ .a ~ ~ = 11) Ct-4 "tj '...m 1=: ~ <I) ~ tU 8 I:: - S Q .- "i:I'::I 0 ,j 1=: ~. C p.. (/) 't:l 1=: Cl a 1=: ~ E-< ~ 0 == .- ~ 't:l~~~~<I) G;) Q) ~~C) ~ 'E] 8 -a ~ '60 ~ Q) i!l oS ..Q ~ 5 11) ~.....<i::Q.11) ~ ~<I) "tjcO 0 o 0 J:l c:l '"0 ~.s :J !f ~Q. $a e Q) U:: ~ g;_~~<<Iat~ ~:E"tj ~13 ~1;:j ~ 11) ..... ~ C s:: ~ i '.5 ~ ~, "U; '13 .... '"0 6h ] E,s ~.,g 0 g~;Q.. 'i ~ 0 = ~u.m,u; ..... E : El .- .~,q,) e ' 0 CI.l g ~ ~ 11) C 11). ;g""",..Q p,. 'E-<'1:J Q) ~ ~'"O .... .... "tj >..... ~ -. ~' 8 2l 't:l ~ ..... cl1)l1)~~ 'at~ ~~<i:: ..Q-Cl..QC 'c;..Q ~ '5 0 ,l:; $a .S- ~ Ct-4 E' <<I e 11) s ~ ~ - ~ 'E-< ~ Q)::. .;;.t:: 0 t+:: 15' -e ~ 5::. 11).... . ~ 0 Q)..J:l. El "tj C -.... tU 11) .... 'Cii .,J:l..... 11) 0 ~ . ~ ~ 0 -' ~ 0 : .2 'E ~ ~ ~ ~ a'~ ~ ~ $ 'g ~ .~ '8 ~ ~ ~.g :;; s..r::: p..;S ..Q 't:l.Q) "Q) ':C "tj 5 ..... is.... 5 C ~ 't:l 11) ~;.s ~ ] 8.} ~'oS:g 2. 8 5 8 .a~ :a .,g ~ 8 11).... (/) rg :> 0 '<I) ~::t c:l Q) 8 ~ ~ S <i:: Sh ~ ~ t:: 'u Q) ..<I) ~.;;::< O..s:l Q) "8 bO '0 't:l ~ ta 't:l <:: ~ ~ ~ g > ~tE 5.SbO 5 .13' E-< ~ c ~.~ 11) E-< .l!3 .... -8 u Q)' t: ~ 6 < a !' Q) 11) ~ 'i: 1=: ;S;S 11) ~ .B ~ oS Q).... !:l.~ (ij - il (/) .g ~~(/);S0.~....~~cU~oS5j:l.,o:::S~"" ~ 0 (/) ~ - 0 ~.;;::< <<I Q) 't:l ~ 1=: ..... 0 .... 0 ~ C ~ $' 't:l ~ ~ ~ Q) .~ oS .; $a 2l ~ 'i ..... .g 'Q ~.~ ~ 'i 'C ~ g. = ~ ~ ~ ~ 9, ~ '1 'EI'E 0 'i .......... . C ..Q ~ -::I oS 5..Q = - tU ~ (/) ~, ~.... "1""""4 "'" II... 0" " '-' ,-- "...-I - 't:l "'!' " -" Q) .. 11)..r::: 1=: ~ ~ 'ug ~ 1=: F ~ a ~,~ ~ ~ ~! [~'. ~! ~ t"' 1=: ~ 11) .... ~~ 't:l (ij'i;! Q) ~ ~), ~~~ ~ .... ,....., '"0 C 11) '--' r-- ..... .0\ ..... o N ,....., <:: '--' r- 0\ ('l('l N N ,......., 1.0 o o C'l -.::t~ C'l >> ""5 ~ s:: o ] o ~ ~ o E-< ~ C) o ~ 11) - ..... ~ u 11) -5 ~ ,D 't:l 11) 00 (/) ::I C) 00 .... 't:l ~ - - ro C) t+:: .... C) Q) fE- 11) .... Q) ~ ~ o - ~ C .... 't:l Q) ~ ~ :E 00 ..s:l ~ ~ ~ p.. '--' C'l City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Peter Herlofsky; Robin Roland FROM: Kevin Carroll SUBJECT: Castle Rock Township OAA (Revisions) DATE: July 31,2006 Peter & Robin, City Council members may be interested in the financial impact of Castle Rock Township's proposal that the "administrative expense" fee percentage in the OAA [Paragraph 17] be increased from 7.5% to 15%. The proposed increase would not affect the actual amount of money transferred from the City to the Township. It would simply modify Castle Rock Township's internal allocation ofthose funds, by essentially shifting about $18,000 from a "restricted" category (money that Castle Rock Township is legally obligated to apply to specified road costs) to an "unrestricted" category (money that the Town Board has the discretion to apply to any Township expenses). As I understand it, the revision was proposed by the Township because the original 7.5% figure in the OAA would have resulted in a (roughly) 50% reduction in the total amount of unrestricted funds that the Township would get if the properties in question were annexed by ordinance. A prior staff analysis had indicated that if (by way of illustration) all of the parcels in the 9l8-acre Annexation Area were annexed by ordinance in 2006, the Township would receive $32,585.68 in unrestricted funds from the City over a five-year period (90% of the Township's 2006 "base" taxes would be paid in 2007, 70% in 2008,50% in 2009, etc.). However, it was projected that the Township would receive only $17,990.18 in unrestricted funds under the original terms ofthe OAA (7.5% of the total projected revenue sharing of$239,869.17; see attached revenue sharing analysis dated June 22, 2006). Increasing the administrative fee percentage from 7.5% to 15% would result in the Township receiving unrestricted funds in the projected amount of $35,980.38 in an "OAA scenario," which is within $3,394.70 of the amount that the Township would be likely to receive in an "annexation by ordinance scenario." ~)(',/"!1 RI' -./ l' .,.- Farmineton/Castle Rock Revenue Sharine Statutory Revenue Sharing vs. Orderly Annexation Agreement Revenue Sharing June 22, 2006 1. Statutory Revenue Sharing: $32,585.68 See attached Excel spreadsheet. Estimate assumes that 100% of the property located within the proposed Annexation Area is annexed immediately (Year 1), and that the Township receives a declining share of its Year 1 taxes during Years 2 through 6 per current Minnesota statute. 2. Orderly Annexation Agreement Revenue Sharing: $239,869.17 This estimate is based on the following assumptions: a. The parcels that are currently owned by ISD 192 (185.54 acres) will be developed as a non- taxable school site. b. The parcels that are currently owned by the Dakota County Agricultural Society (Dakota County Fairgrounds and Extension Office; 351.73 acres, total) will not be developed for residential purposes. c. The properties that have the most significant potential for residential development include the following: B. Olson T. Braun S. Sowieja S. Sowieja T. Mock L. Sargent Record Shockley Turek Total: 157.60 gross 54.24 gross 58.86 gross 3.97 gross 2.50 gross 2.50 gross 9.80 gross 57.94 gross 11.59 gross 359.0 gross 157.60 net (after deducting floodplain) 12.72 net 37.54 net 3.97 net 2.50 net 2.50 net 9.80 net 29.41 net 11.59 net 267.63 net d. The net acreage referred to above is further reduced by roads (14% or 37.5 acres), parks (11 % or 29.4 acres), and ponds/wetlands (14% or 37.5 acres), resulting in 163.23 acres for actual residential construction. e. Three houses are built per acre on the 163.23 acres referred to in "d" above = 489 houses. f. Each house in "e" above has a taxable market value of $242,600, resulting in total property taxes payable in 2006 of$2,823.64; City's share of that total = $981.06; 50% of$981.06 = $490.53); 489 houses X $490.53 per house = $239,869.17 g. Township's revenue will increase if more property is developed or if market values are higher or if housing density is higher. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us lib TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Peter Herlofsky City Administrator SUBJECT: Annexation Petitions DATE: August 7, 2006 Attached are two annexation petitions for your consideration. These are for the Terry and Linda Mock property and the Bryce and Carole Olson property. Respectfully submitted , ,..;/./" / ".1'-- /,/ J., 1"'/ ~,'/ f: 'l. /x" . /',/ P Peter Herlofsky City Adminisfrator //"7 --) PETITION FOR ANNEXATION In the Matter of the Petition by ~Ti=~i.f and L/nd.rl- /ttoc~ ( Property Owner(s) for annexation ofland to the City of Farmington pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 414 To: The City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota Copies to: Dakota County Board of Commissioners 1590 West Highway 55 Hastings, MN 55033 Minnesota Planning Municipal Boundary Adjustments 658 Cedar Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Town Board of f.Als-f/e- tel:..' Township By signature hereunder, petitioner(s) affirm that he/she (they) is (are): X the sole property owner(s) of the area proposed for annexation; or _ all of the property owners of the area proposed for annexation; or _ a majority of the property owners of the area proposed for annexation. It is hereby requested that the City of Farmington annex the property herein described and now located in the Town of Cv.>ffe. i& c kICu.m.s ~ ip, Dakota County, Minnesota: (Provide the legal description of the property, parcels of property of area proposed for annexation; provide attachments containing the legal description if it is too long for inclusion in this space. . F 5..u.tiC'1 5 TWN i 1'3 /?IfA/G-E '3 ?-. 5 t9C.R~. /1'1/,- 5' 113 I'!.~ _3if(P~Z(.> Fr 0 .,. Si:=. f/..;.J Or NW '/1 t:=X E IO/~. b2- II /"H192.E of Where petItIOn IS filed by resIdents or property owner(s): I) list the number of petitioners required by statute to commence this annexation proceeding: 2) list the number of petitioners who have signed the petition: C:\Documents and Settings\lsmick\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKl \docs- #101424-v2-Annexation Petition revised form.DOC - - - Where the petition is filed by a municipality or town, identify the action taken by the governing body: Resolution Number: Date: Ordinance Number: Date: Notice ofIntent Date: The area of the property proposed for annexation: (Note: The size of the property will determine the manner and timing of the process for considering this Petition.) >( Less than 40 acres _ More than 40 acres but less than or equal to 60 acres More than 60 acres More than 200 acres Less than 200 acres As to the property proposed for annexation, annexation is sought because the property is: 1. 2. 3. 4. X/ 5. 6. - 7. ~/ - 8. - Owned by the City of Farmington Completely surround by land within the Farmington City limits. Abutting the City of Farmington on the N S W E (circle one) boundary. The area to be annexed is 60 acres or less, AND the area to be annexed is not now served by public sewer facilities and public sewer facilities are not otherwise available. (Applicable only if all property owners join in the petition) After August 1, 1995, it has been approved by preliminary or final plat for residential development lots averaging 21,780 square feet or less in area and is land within two miles of the boundary of the City of Farmington Not abutting the City of Farmington, but is within an existing orderly annexation area and all property owners join in the petition. 40 acres in size or less and at least sixty percent (60%) of the property abuts the City of Farmington. The property is not located within an area presently under consideration by the City of Farmington or the Municipal Board for boundary adjustment. C:\Documents and Settings\lsmick\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKI \docs- #101424-v2-Annexation Petition revised form.DOC - - - 9. The property is platted. Note: Before your property can be annexed, Minnesota Law requires that a public hearing be held preceded by at least 30 days written notice by certified mail to the Town or Towns in which the property is located and to all landowners within and contiguous to the area proposed for annexation. The costs incurred by the City in identifying the persons to whom this notice is to be mailed and the mailing list itself will be charged to the petitioners and must be paid before the mailing goes out. The following documents/items must be attached with the Petition: 1. Verification of ownership by a current commitment for title insurance, owners' and encumbrancers' report, etc; 2. Certificate verifying the Petition was served on all parties required under Minn. Stat. Ch. 414; 3. Filing fee required under Minn. R. 6000.3400; 4. Map ofthe annexation area required pursuant to 6000.0800 (c); 5. City application fee. Dated: .2 - /-1- .- , 20 {).5 . Signature(s) ofPetitioner(s) { ....u.l ~ {j ~~ (~~ C:\Documents and Settings\1smick\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK1 \docs- #101424-v2-Annexation Petition revised form. DOC - - - PETITION FOR ANNEXATION In the Matter of the Petition by BrtJ ce '+-- CCl~ro \'C o ISdJ'J Property Owner(s) for annexation ofland to the City of Farmington pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 414 To: The City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota Copies to: Dakota County Board of Commissioners 1590 West Highway 55 Hastings, MN 55033 Minnesota Planning Municipal Boundary Adjustments 658 Cedar Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Town Board of CCLS+Le \ZocL Township By signature hereunder, petitioner(s) affirm that he/she (they) is (are): / the sole property owner(s) of the area proposed for annexation; or all of the property owners of the area proposed for annexation; or - a majority of the property owners ofthe area proposed for annexation. It is her~by requested that the Cit?,,,ofFarmington annex the property ~erein describe? and now located III the Town of 0..0,5 -n f (2n e,JC- , Dakota County, MInnesota: (ProvIde the legal description of the property, parcels of property of area proposed for annexation; provide attachments containing the legal description if it is too long for inclusion in this space. Where petition is filed by residents or property owner(s): 1) list the number of oetitioners required by statute to commence this annexation proceeding: \ . 2) list the number of petitioners who have signed the petition: \ C:\Documents and Settings\lsmick\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKl \docs- #101424-v2-Annexation Petition revised form. DOC - - - Where the petition is filed by a municipality or town, identify the action taken by the governing body: Resolution Number: Date: Ordinance Number: Date: Notice of Intent Date: The area of the property proposed for annexation: (Note: The size ofthe property will determine the manner and timing ofthe process for considering this Petition.) Less than 40 acres _ More than 40 acres but less than or equal to 60 acres More than 60 acres More than 200 acres V Less than 200 acres As to the property proposed for annexation, annexation is sought because the property is: 1. Owned by the City of Farmington 2. Completely surround by land within the Farmington City limits. Abutting the City of Farmington on the N (S) W ~circle one) boundary. 3.v 4. The area to be annexed is 60 acres or less, AND the area to be annexed is not now served by public sewer facilities and public sewer facilities are not otherwise available. (Applicable only if all property owners join in the petition) 5. After August 1, 1995, it has been approved by preliminary or final plat for residential development lots averaging 21,780 square feet or less in area and is land within two miles of the boundary of the City of Farmington 6. Not abutting the City of Farmington, but is within an existing orderly annexation area and all property owners join in the petition. 7. 40 acres in size or less and at least sixty percent (60%) of the property abuts the City of Farmington. 8. The property is not located within an area presently under consideration by the City of Farmington or the Municipal Board for boundary adjustment. C:\Documents and Settings\1smick\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKl \docs- #101424-v2-Annexation Petition revised form. DOC - - 9. The property is platted. Note: Before your property can be annexed, Minnesota Law requires that a public hearing be held preceded by at least 30 days written notice by certified mail to the Town or Towns in which the property is located and to all landowners within and contiguous to the area proposed for annexation. The costs incurred by the City in identifying the persons to whom this notice is to be mailed and the mailing list itself will be charged to the petitioners and must be paid before the mailing goes out. The following documents/items must be attached with the Petition: 1. Verification of ownership by a current commitment for title insurance, owners' and encumbrancers' report, etc; 2. Certificate verifying the Petition was served on all parties required under Minn. Stat. Ch. 414; 3. Filing fee required under Minn. R. 6000.3400; 4. Map of the annexation area required pursuant to 6000.0800 (c); 5. City application fee. Dated: AWo1~j 2;; ,20 C;<-t ..---;7 Signature(s) ofPetitioner(s) ~, ~""- ~QQ~h--- C:\Documents and Settings\lsmick\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKl \docs- # 101424- v2- Annexation_Petition Jevised _form. DOC 13a... City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrato~ Robin Roland, Finance Director FROM: SUBJECT: Liquor Store Check Writing Policy DATE: August 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION At the June 19th Council meeting, Council member McKnight inquired about the "Farmington Checks Only" policy at the City's liquor stores, citing several complaints from our liquor store customers. DISCUSSION Non-sufficient funds (NSF) checks are a problem for most retail businesses. Increasingly, businesses are refusing to even accept checks - preferring to accept cash or credit/debit cards instead. The City's liquor operations have seen the number and value ofNSF checks increase consistently over the last several years. Different strategies have been used to attempt to reduce the number ofNSF checks written to the liquor stores and different recovery methods have been tried to little avail. NSF check write offs have totaled close to $1000 annually for the last three years. Upon analysis of the NSF checks, it was determined that a significant source of non-collectable NSF's were checks with non-Farmington addresses. The "Farmington Checks Only" policy/strategy was instituted to see if the amount (and dollar value) of NSF's declined. The resulting complaints from loyal customers who did not have Farmington addresses were an unfortunate and unacceptable side effect. Liquor operations staff has procured a solution to the problem ofNSF checks which will allow us to rescind the policy. Tele-Check services will be installed in both liquor stores within the month. Checks written to the liquor stores will be submitted through the Tele-check system and effectively converted to an EFT (electronic funds transfer) which will guarantee payment is received. Fees charged by Tele-Check are consistent with the credit card fees that are already budgeted for annually. Staff believes that this solution will save staff time, assure collection of payments and eliminate NSF expenses in our liquor operations. We hope our customers will understand and accept our apologies for any inconvenience they have encountered. ACTION REQUIRED This memo is for Council's information only. Respectfully submitted, ~ffL Finance Director Values Statement Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional and cost-effective manner. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Ethics and Integrity We believe that ethics and integrity are the foundation blocks of public trust and confidence and that all meaningful relationships are built on these values. Open and Honest Communication We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. Cooperation and Teamwork We believe that the public is best served when departments and employees work cooperatively as a team rather than at cross purposes. Visionary Leadership and Planning We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be visionary and to plan for the future. Positive Relations with the Community We believe that positive relations with the community and public we serve leads to positive, involved, and active citizens. Professionalism We believe that continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism and are committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and the development of our employees. R55CKSUM LOG23000VO COUNCIL MEETING ON AUGUST 7, 2006 Vendor 4 PAWS ANIMAL CONTROL Business Unit POLICE ADMINISTRATION AFFINITY PLUS FEDERAL CREDIT U EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Object Amount PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,922.32 1,922.32 CREDIT UNION PAYABLE 5,370.00 5.370.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,180.00 3,180.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 880.00 880.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD 22,605.72 COST OF GOODS SOLD 25,339.05 47,944.77 RECREATION FEES - GENERAL 50.00 50.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD 32.61 EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 33.75 PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 28.53 94.89 ELECTRIC 267.75 267.75 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 610.00 610.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,416.40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,569.60 4,986.00 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 26.63 26.63 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 113.17 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 51.12 OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 201.42 365.71 AFLAC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND ALBRIGHT, JIM RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES ALCORN BEVERAGE CO. INC. DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE ALEXANDER,LAURA GENERAL FUND REVENUES ALLEN, ANNIE SIMMMING POOL OPERATIONS SIMMMING POOL OPERATIONS SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS ALlIANT MECHANICAL POLICE ADMINISTRATION ALlINA MEDICAL CLINIC HUMAN RESOURCES AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING I SPRUCE ST EXTENSION HILLDEE RECONSTRUCTION ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC CAPITAL ACQUISITION AN COM TECHNICAL CENTER FIRE SERVICES CAPITAL ACQUISITION FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS '-l ~ 1 ~ R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 2 7/17/2006 - 816/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount ANDERSENINC,EARLF PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 359.42 MEADOW CREEK 3RD OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 3,021.10 3,380.52 APPLE VALLEY FORD PATROL SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 113.36 PATROL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 17.62 130.98 APPLE VALLEY, CITY OF CABLE/COMMUNICATIONS PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,988.25 8,988.25 ARCTIC GLACIER ICE DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,046.00 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,193.65 2,239.65 ASLAKSON'S BLACKTOPPING SERVIC MIL & OVERLAY ANNUAL PRJ CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 102,696.26 102,696.26 ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 935.83 935.83 ATOM PATROL SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 400.00 400.00 BATCHELDER, JIM RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154.00 154.00 BAUER BUILT INC STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE TIRES 326.26 326.26 BCNTRAINING & DEVELOPMENT PATROL SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 135.00 135.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 293.54 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 59.87 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,576.97 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 169.43 2,099.81 BELZER'S CHEV/DODGE/KIA, JEFF STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 170.40 170.40 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 3 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount BERG, JASON RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,435.00 1,435.00 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 40.48 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND COFFEE FUND 121.42 16190 BOLLESEN, KIM RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 31.09 31.09 BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLlK INC ENGINEERING SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,555.00 STREET MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,401.44 ANNUAL SEALCOATING PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 111.06 ASH STREET PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,796.25 195TH ST EXTENSION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20,059.75 208th ST WEST PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,264.56 SPRUCE ST EXTENSION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 86,256.36 ELM ST RECONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,207.60 TH #3 IMP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,975.74 PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37,937.33 FLAGSTAFF AVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,781.31 HILLDEE RECONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45,494.72 210TH STREET EAST PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,223.00 MIL & OVERLAY ANNUAL PRJ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 109.32 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,707.63 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,957.52 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,355.00 WELL #8 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,140.75 INSURANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 240.00 232,574.34 BREISACHER, WAYNE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 20.81 20.81 BUGBEE'S LOCKSMITH BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 71.45 71.45 C&M HOMES ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 4,000.00 4,000.00 CAHLANDER, DANIELLE ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 18.02 18.02 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 4 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount CAMPBELL KNUTSON LEGISLATIVE CONTROL LEGAL 459.00 ADMINISTRATION LEGAL 1,821.53 HUMAN RESOURCES LEGAL 216.00 PLANNING & ZONING LEGAL 2,092.50 POLICE ADMINISTRATION LEGAL 6,298.53 ENGINEERING SERVICES LEGAL 648.50 HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEGAL 621.00 POLICE FORFEITURES LEGAL 406.00 PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS LEGAL 2,655.00 HILLDEE RECONSTRUCTION LEGAL 112.50 MIL & OVERLAY ANNUAL PRJ LEGAL 112.50 15,443.06 CARDMEMBER SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 995.00 PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 54.00 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES FUEL 31.15 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 541.76 RAMBLING RIVER CENTER EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 21.29 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 140.92 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 569.21 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 316.60 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 5.34 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 547.25 3,222.52 CARQUEST STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 401.44 PARK MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 148.38 PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 671.01- BUILDING MAINT SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 2.82 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 238.90 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 7.86 FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,348.72 1,477.11 CDW GOVERNMENT INC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICE SUPPLIES 263.31 263.31 CENTEX HOMES ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000.00 2,000.00 CHENEY,HEATHER SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 19.74 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 5 7/17/2006 - 8/612006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 19.74 CINTAS - 754 POLICE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 166.00 STREET MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 119.42 PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 241.01 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 1050 BUILDING MAl NT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 115.78 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 119.42 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 144.82 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 343.31 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 144.82 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 119.42 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.94 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 119.42 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 144.82 FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 228.72 FLEET OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 67.73 2,114.13 CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT LLC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP BUILDING RENTAL 10,468.77 10,468.77 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC CAPITAL ACQUISITION MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 1,305.95 1,305.95 CNH CAPITAL STREET MAINTENANCE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 393.42 PARK MAINTENANCE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 417.05 810.47 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 738.80 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 580.80 1,319.60 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 25,663.65 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 34,067.00 59,730.65 COLLOVA, JENNIFER STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 18.69 18.69 COMMERCIAL ASP HAL T CO STREET MAINTENANCE STREET MATERIALS 857.85 857.85 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 6 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION SPRUCE ST EXTENSION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 72.30 72.30 D J 4 LESS RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 325.00 325.00 D R HORTON SANITARY SEWER TRUNK OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 41,148.34 ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 8.000.00 49,148.34 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER COMPANY PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 216.74 DEPOT WAY ART PARK OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 367.36 MEADOW CREEK 3RD OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 14.14 ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 35.79 634.03 DAKOTA COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 184.00 HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 46.00 230.00 DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG PATROL SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 195.00 195.00 DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER/AUDITO HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 6.65 HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OTHER 2,384.46 2,391.11 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,367.30 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 5,752.10 9,119.40 DCX LLC SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD 510.00 510.00 DELEGARD TOOL CO SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 214.05 214.05 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY PATROL SERVICES TELEPHONE 270.00 270.00 DUBBELS, TOM FLEET OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 39.39 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 7 7/17/2006 - 8/612006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 39.39 DUEBERS DEPT STORE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 1.97 1.97 DIINt\l BRaS COFFEE I-IIIMAN RF!':()IIRr.F!': ()TI-IFR 10000 100.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC HUMAN RESOURCES EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING 147.50 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE ADVERTISING 156.00 303.50 ECONO FOODS HUMAN RESOURCES OTHER 125.00 POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 38.28 FIRE SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 31.92 FIRE SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 6.25 FIRE SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 22.76 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 482.92 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 8.09 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD 38.51 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 5.10 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1.70 760.53 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC E FARMINGTON TIF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 336.38 336.38 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC FIRE SERVICES VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 17,779.28 17,779.28 EMPIRE TOWNSHIP SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 472.05 472.05 ENERGY ALTERNATIVES INC POLICE ADMINISTRATION ELECTRIC 1,852.82 BUILDING MAINT SERVICES ELECTRIC 577.37 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE ELECTRIC 721.71 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS ELECTRIC 721.71 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS ELECTRIC 144.33 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE ELECTRIC 721.71 4,739.65 EUREKA CONSTRUCTION INC SPRUCE ST EXTENSION CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 522,441.10 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 8 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 522,441.10 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 352.00 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 352.00 704.00 FARMINGTON BAKERY INC FIRE SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 137.06 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 10.20 147.26 FARMINGTON COMMUNITY EDUCATION INVESTIGATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 60.00 60.00 FARMINGTON EMPLOYEE CLUB EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE CLUB 346.16 346.16 FARMINGTON PRINTING INC ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 31.95 ADMINISTRATION OUTSIDE PRINTING 527.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 24.50 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 493.33 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 493.33 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 10.01 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 493.34 2,073.64 FARMINGTON, CITY OF RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 200.00 200.00 IRIf:135!~ ""uN I KAt,,; 111'4"" LLG A.3M JTf\E:ET ~ "VJt:.(j I COfJSTRtJeTIO,'4 C614Tf\ACTs-.- -62,54&.6& 82,918.88 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 2,688.86 POLICE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 2,072.66 PATROL SERVICES TELEPHONE 67.15 ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE TELEPHONE 56.01 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE TELEPHONE 560.22 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS TELEPHONE 56.01 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE TELEPHONE 357.05 5,857.96 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF AME COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 88.76 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP TELEPHONE 1.53 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 9 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 90.29 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS-ACCESS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TELEPHONE 337.23 POLICE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 143.05 FIRE SERVICES TELEPHONE 143.06 623 34 GATEWAY COMPANIES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.70 CAPITAL ACQUISITION OFFICE SUPPLIES 13,105.97 13,207.67 GEISE, TRACY EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 1,005.00 1,005.00 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,118.13 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,118.13 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,118.14 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,118.14 4,472.54 GERSTER JEWELERS HUMAN RESOURCES OTHER 30.00 30.00 GODFREY'S CUSTOM SIGNS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 479.25 479.25 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 789.60 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 789.60 1,579.20 GRAFIX SHOPPE CAPITAL ACQUISITION VEHICLES 650.00 650.00 GRANDEL INTERNATIONAL LLC BUILDING MAl NT SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 56.47 56.47 GREENHAVEN PRINTING NPDES Phase II OUTSIDE PRINTING 117.15 117.15 GRIGGS COOPER & CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 6,959.12 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 9,322.64 16,281.76 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 10 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount HANSON, JESSICA GENERAL FUND REVENUES RENTAL INCOME 25.00 25.00 HANSON, KATHY GENERAL FUND REVENUES RECREATION FEES - GENERAL 18.00 18.00 HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE CHEMICALS 15,086.80 15,086.80 HEAL THPARTNERS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,628.80 6,628.80 HERLOFSKY JR, PETER J ADMINISTRATION CELLULAR PHONES 25.00 ADMINISTRATION TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 355.70 ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 85.89 466.59 HERMEL WHOLESALE S\I\I1MMING POOL OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,220.85 1,220.85 HOHENSTEINS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,743.65 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 4,021.90 6,765.55 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC DAISY KNOLL PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 907.84 WESTVIEW ACRES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 907.84 DAKOTA CTY ESTATES PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 907.84 MYSTIC MEADOWS PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 907.85 3,631.37 HOLMES, KURT SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 20.49 20.49 HOLST, GARY RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 88.00 88.00 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY S\I\I1MMING POOL OPERATIONS CHEMICALS 1,158.99 1,158.99 HUGHES, RUSSELL RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 88.00 88.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 11 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount HUNTER, JON SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 35.00 35.00 HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY WATER UTILITY EXPENSE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 20,169.59 '016959 HYDRO-VAC INC WELL #8 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 900.00 900.00 ICC- INT'L CODE COUNCIL BUILDING INSPECTIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 100.00 100.00 ICERINK SUPPLY CO ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 87.01 87.01 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND ICMA PAYABLE 10,193.84 10,193.84 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 291.26 ADMINISTRATION RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 3,194.90 3,486.16 IMAGES ON METAL INC RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 1,430.06 1,430.06 INTOXIMETERS CAPITAL ACQUISITION MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 594.27 594.27 JACOBSON ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS 208th ST WEST PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,303.75 10,303.75 JG WEAR RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 334.30 SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 196.70 531.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COM PAN DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 11,569.26 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 13,107.81 24,677.07 KA TH FUEL OIL SERVICE FLEET OPERATIONS LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES 739.81 739.81 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 12 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount KEEPRSINC POLICE ADMINISTRATION UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 105.90 PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 720.92 826.82 KEYLAND HOMES ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 4,000.00 4,000.00 KOHLBECK, MISSIE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 47.21 47.21 KWIK TRIP ENGINEERING SERVICES FUEL 54.82 PARK MAINTENANCE FUEL 247.35 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES FUEL 41.14 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS FUEL 61.18 404.49 LAKEVILLE SENIOR CENTER SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 54.70 54.70 LAKEVILLE, CITY OF PATROL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,816.36 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,908.17 14,724.53 LANDSCAPE DEPOT STREET MAINTENANCE STREET MATERIALS 19.16 19.16 LANDSCAPE JUNCTION INC PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 1,500.00 1,500.00 LARSON, LENA SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 34.71 34.71 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND LELS DUES PAYABLE 481.00 481.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE 900.00 900.00 LINDELL, STEPHEN SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 71.12 71.12 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 13 7/1712006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount LOCAL GVMT INFO SYSTEMS ASSN. HUMAN RESOURCES DATA PROCESSING 2,204.00 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA PROCESSING 2,214.00 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FURNITURE & OFFICE E 1,990.78 GENERAL ACCOUNTING DATA PROCESSING 3,658.00 GENERAL ACCOUNTING OUTSIDE PRINTING 24.79 61 III DIf\lG II\iSPI=CTIOI\iS nATA PROr.I=!;!;II\i(; 31:>000 POLICE ADMINISTRATION DATA PROCESSING 10,506.00 POLICE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 360.00 FIRE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 92.00 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE DATA PROCESSING 671.00 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS DATA PROCESSING 671.00 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS DATA PROCESSING 671.00 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE DATA PROCESSING 671.00 26,853.57 LUEDERS, JEFF RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44.00 44.00 M. AMUNDSON LLP DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 954.75 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,200.38 3,155.13 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 73.19 73.19 MADDEN & ASSOCIATES, FRANK HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 249.60 249.60 MANLEY BROTHERS ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 6,000.00 6,000.00 MARK VII DISTRIBUTORS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 11,004.36 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 16,166.98 27,171.34 MC CONTRACTING INC STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 850.00 850.00 MCCARTHY, DAN ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000.00 2,000.00 MCNEARNEY HOMES, ROBERT ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 4,000.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 14 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Un~ Object Amount 4,000,00 MEDICA EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 43,235.61 43,235.61 METRO ALARM SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,168.38 3,168.38 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE SAC CHARGE RETAINER 24,552.00 24,552.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE MCES FEES 64,677.84 64,677.84 MINGER CONSTRUCTION INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,000.00 3,000.00 MINNESOTA AFSCME COUNCIL #5 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND AFSCME UNION DUES PAYABLE 1,363.00 1,363.00 MINNESOTAAG GROUP INC PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 81.26 81.26 MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOCIATION EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND MBA PAYABLE 108.34 108.34 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 28.89 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 76.68 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 93.28 198.85 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO STREET MAINTENANCE STREET MATERIALS 223.65 223.65 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE DEPT ASSN FIRE SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 300.00 300.00 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN 3,739.57 3,739.57 MINNESOTA, STATE OF SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 10.00 10.00 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 15 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 2,628.48 2,628.48 MN DEPT OF REVENUE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND GARNISHMENT PAYABLE 537.77 537.77 MN GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS GENERAL ACCOUNTING TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 200.00 200.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA LIFE INS PAYABLE 82.00 82.00 MN OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNO PATROL SERVICES TELEPHONE 74.00 74.00 MN PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY WASTEWATER TRTMNT BOND 1995 DEBT PRINCIPAL 18,142.72 WASTEWATER TRTMNT BOND 1995 DEBT INTEREST 11,191.24 29,333.96 MONRO GOLF CAMP, DOUG RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 762.00 762.00 MOODY COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 350.00 350.00 MORGANS TREE SERVICE NATURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 18,308.42 18,308.42 MORICAL, JEN ELECTIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 17.48 17.48 MOSS, EZRA GENERAL FUND REVENUES OTHER PERMITS 100.00 100.00 MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CO INC BUILDING INSPECTIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS .97 FIRE SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 8.55 9.52 MUZAK - NORTH CENTRAL DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 56.98 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 60.23 117.21 R55CKSUM lOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 16 7/17/2006 - 8/612006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount MVTl LABORATORIES INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 173.25 173.25 NORTH COUNTRY CONCRETE INC MEADOW CREEK 3RD OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 6,280.00 6,280.00 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY IN WATER UTILITY EXPENSE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 148.09 148.09 NRG ENERGY INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,103.37 1,103.37 NRG PROCESSING SOLUTIONS llC NATURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 115.50 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 65.63 181.13 OFFICEMAX - A BOISE COMPANY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,691.32 1,691.32 OLSON MARKET RESEARCH INC, C J CABlE/COMMUNICA TIONS PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,938.75 11,938.75 OlWEll, JOHN J. RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 510.00 510.00 ORKIN EXTERMINATING BUilDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 88.98 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.97 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.97 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4.19 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.97 156.08 PAUSTIS WINE CO. DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 144.00 PilOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 320.00 464.00 PElLlCCI HARDWARE & RENTAL DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 35.32 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OUTSIDE PRINTING 4.04 DOWNTOWN liQUOR REV & EXP EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 19.16 PilOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 46.61 105.13 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 17 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount PERFORMANCE PLUMBING AND ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 92.00 92.00 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 5,535.29 PII OT KNOR IIQIIOR RFVFNIIF r.O~T OF r.oon~ ~Ol n 7 13R 56 12,673.85 PINE BEND LANDFILL INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13,481.10 13,481.10 PITNEY BOWES ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 63.98 63.98 POLFUS IMPLEMENT INC. NATURAL RESOURCES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 39.25 PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 494.50 533.75 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 2,385.19 2.385.19 PRIVATE UNDERGROUND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 870.50 870.50 PRO-SWEEP INC PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,312.50 1,312.50 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO OF AME EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,510.77 2,510.77 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA PAYABLE 23,099.19 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA 28,291.36 51,390.55 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,639.01 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,998.19 7,637.20 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION WELL #8 LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 267.12 267.12 RENNER & SONS, E H WELL #8 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 35,296.53 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 18 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount 35,296.53 REUTER, BRENDA SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 30.49 30.49 RIVER COUNTRY COOPERATIVE FIRE SERVICES FUEL 277.22 277.22 RIVERTOWN NEWPAPER GROUP HUMAN RESOURCES EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING 159.00 PLANNING & ZONING LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 322.00 RAMBLING RIVER CENTER OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 91.35 DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 46.80 PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE COST OF GOODS SOLD 352.80 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE ADVERTISING 35.00 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS ADVERTISING 35.00 NPDES Phase II ADVERTISING 35.00 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 245.00 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE ADVERTISING 35.00 WELL #8 LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 42.00 1,398.95 RMI-C-DIVISON OF ROTONICS MFG SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 10,718.00 10,718.00 ROC INC BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,883.13 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 858.39 SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214.60 SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214.60 STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 42.92 WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 214.60 3,428.24 ROLAND, ROBIN GENERAL ACCOUNTING TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 15.00 GENERAL ACCOUNTING MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 31.15 46.15 ROSEMOUNT PARK & RECREATION RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 725.92 725.92 ROSEMOUNT SAW & TOOL NATURAL RESOURCES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 40.95 40.95 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 813/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 19 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount ROTTY, DENISE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 300.00 300.00 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 264.00 264.00 SCHRADER'S LAW ENFORCEMENT SUP BUILDING INSPECTIONS EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 12.73 12.73 SCHWANZ, TINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 31.81 31.81 SCHVIIINESS LLC PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE BUILDING RENTAL 13,242.16 13,242.16 SHADICK, LISA ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 77.38 ELECTIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 17.50 94.88 SIENNA CORPORATION E FARMINGTON TIF DEVELOPER PAYMENTS 180,654.18 180,654.18 SONATA HOMES ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000.00 2,000.00 SOUTHSIDE REDI-MIX, INC PRAIRIE VIEW PARK OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 530.83 MEADOW CREEK 3RD OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 284.67 815.50 SPRINT PATROL SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 490.95 490.95 STAR TRIBUNE HUMAN RESOURCES EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING 580.80 580.80 STOUT, LINDA RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 400.00 RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 26.15 426.15 STREICHER'S PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 260.65 260.65 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Council Check Summary Page - 20 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Vendor Business Unit Object Amount SVL SERVICE CORPORATION BUILDING MAl NT SERVICES BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 1,238.95 1,238.95 T C CONSTRUCTION ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2,000.00 2,000.00 THAYER, CHUCK RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154.00 154.00 THORSON HOMES ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 2.000.00 2,000.00 TOWN'S EDGE CAR CARE HUMAN RESOURCES OTHER 125.00 125.00 TRITCHLER, SEAMUS RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,430.00 2,430.00 VALLEY MINING GENERAL FUND REVENUES BUILDING PERMITS 1,431.75 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK CITY SEWER ACCESS CHARGE 5,040.00 SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE SAC CHARGE RETAINER 18,600.00 25,071.75 VART HEM COFFEE CAFE LEGISLATIVE CONTROL TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 29.75 29.75 VERIZON WIRELESS FIRE SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 23.55 23.55 VIKING AUTO SALVAGE INC PATROL SERVICES VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 500.00 500.00 VOGEL, ROBERT C BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 900.00 900.00 WALTON, MARILYN POLICE ADMINISTRATION UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 52.95 52.95 WEBER, CHARLIE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 13.31 13.31 WEIDEMA INC, S.R. HILLDEE RECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 714,210.52 R55CKSUM LOG23000VO Vendor \I\IINE MERCHANTS Business Unit DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PILOT KNOB LIQUOR REVENUE CITY OF FARMINGTON Council Check Summary 7/17/2006 - 8/6/2006 Object COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD Amount 714,210.52 271.22 465.13 736.35 8/3/2006 12:05:42 Page - 21 \I\IINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE WOLD ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS IN WRIGHT EXPRESS FLEET SERVICES XCEL ENERGY YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS CITY HALL FIRST STREET GARAGE BUILDING INSPECTIONS PATROL SERVICES FIRE SERVICES ENGINEERING SERVICES STREET MAINTENANCE NATURAL RESOURCES PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAl NT SERVICES RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE FLEET OPERATIONS ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE POLICE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINT SERVICES SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS WATER UTILITY EXPENSE VEHICLE TIRES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC Report Totals 6.24 6.24 22,488.20 5,777.59 28,265.79 377.44 4,958.13 903.89 449.84 1,969.23 350.34 1,840.97 212.19 401.23 436.96 4,595.63 293.70 169.12 16,958.67 438.56 438.56 781.19 230.12 287.68 287.68 57.54 287.68 1,931.89 2,809,012.22 ~ALS: SODERBERG ~'OGARTY ~., . "L MCKNIGHT ~ PRITZLAFF ~ \'-TILSON