HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-21-02
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Mission Statement
Through teamwork and cooperation.
the City ofF annington provides quality
services that preserve our proud past and
foster a promisingfuture.
AGENDA
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
November 21, 2002
7:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1.
Call to Order
2.
Approval of agenda
3.
Approval of minutes of September 26, 2002, regular meeting
4.
Public hearings - none
5.
Reports
a. Certified Local Government annual report
6,
Unfinished Business
a. Middle Creek Cemetery heritage landmark nomination
7.
New Business
a. Review draft bed & breakfast ordinance
b. Church of the Advent - adaptive reuse possibilities
8.
Miscellane~s
\..-G1lo~?..;P
Adjourn
9.
MINUTES
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
September 26, 2002
1. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson Strachan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m,
Present: Susan Strachan, George Flynn, Jackie Dooley, Beverly Preece, Tim Rice
Absent: Harbee Tharaldson
Also Present: Bob Vogel, Consultant; Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Director;
Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant
2. APPROVE AGENDA
Under New Business Mr, Vogel added Landmark Designations, and Member Dooley
added Proposed Displays, and Request from an Albert Lea resident for HPC information.
MOTION by Preece, second by Rice to approve the agenda, APIF, MOTION
CARRIED,
3. APPROVE MINUTES - MOTION by Preece, second by Rice, approving the minutes of
July 18 and July 30,2002, APIF, MOTION CARRIED,
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS - none
5. REPORTS
a. Comments from Seminar
Members Dooley and Rice attended the Annual Historical Preservation
Committee Meeting in Owatonna and gave an overview ofthe meeting to the
HPC, They attended very informative sessions and interesting tours. Some of the
sessions dealt with the open meeting law, and that HPC meetings are an important
part of the governmental process. Member Dooley received information on open
meeting laws from the LMC, Members also received a good overview of what
historical preservation commissions are trying to preserve. Member Rice will be
joining the MN Design Team which provides design advice and planning, The
first meeting will be held October 19,2002.
6. PROJECT UPDATE - none
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Plan for Middle Creek Estates Historic Cemetery
It was agreed to drop "Estates" from the name of the cemetery, Mr. Vogel
presented a draft documentation supporting heritage landmark designation of the
Middle Creek Historic Cemetery. The purpose of the designation is so the city
will have a record of how it became a landmark and why. A public hearing,
which requires 30-day notice, will be set at the November 4, 2002 Council
meeting, to be held at the December 2, 2002 Council meeting. The HPC needs to
determine signage, plantings for the boundary, and a covering for the path to
enable people to get to the cemetery. MOTION by Rice, second by Dooley, to
move forward with the heritage designation process. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED,
8. NEW BUSINESS
a. Reporting Responsibility - City Council, Planning Commission
The Planning Commission deals with the use of a property, and the HPC deals
with the design and how the surrounding area will be affected, These two
commissions need to confer with each other so all aspects of a project are
considered, The scope of the city that the HPC covers needs to be conveyed to
the Council. According to city code 2-11-5 D) the HPC recommendation shall be
forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration in making their
recommendation to the City Council. The HPC should advise Council on what
visual effects would replace a structure so they would blend in with the
surrounding area,
b. HPC's Role in Development Process
The HPC would like to have more input in the beginning of the development
process which is allowed in the current ordinances, An ordinance is a textbook
dealing with the law ofthe land and property rights, The HPC felt they need to
educate all involved parties in historic preservation and to promote discussions by
those affected, One way to do this would be to have HPC meetings televised,
c. Landmark Designations
Mr. Vogel stated he is ready to move forward with the landmark designation
process for the three properties on the National Register of Historic Places - the
Exchange Bank Building, 344 3rd Street; Daniel F, Akin House, 19185 Akin .
Road; and the Church ofthe Advent, 412 Oak Street. It was suggested the HPC
should meet with all the owners together.
Mr. Loren Schulz, 500 Spruce Street, would like to have his property designated
as a heritage landmark, and two residents on Oak Street are also interested in
having their properties designated. There are 10 properties determined eligible
for nomination as a Heritage Landmark, and these owners should also be invited
to a meeting to determine their interest and explain the process, The HPC would
like to do 4-5 designations a year.
d. Proposed Display at the Library
Member Dooley was given permission to put up a bulletin board at the library
showing a survey map and the historic district. She would like visual items to
make it interesting for children,
The Preservation Alliance ofMN would like to bring a display to City Hall,
making people aware of historic designation. It will be brought to City Hall after
November I, and will be on display for approximately 1 month. It will be placed
by the building inspections entrance,
d. Request from Albert Lea Resident
During the Annual Historic Preservation Conference, Member Dooley received a
request from Jonathan Green, an Albert Lea resident, asking for information on
Farmington's HPc. Information will be compiled and mailed to him.
9. MISCELLANEOUS
The next meeting will be held November 21,2002. The agenda will include:
Schedule a timeline for the cemetery
Nomination documents for Old St. Michael's Church
Annual government report
Annual meeting
10. ADJOURN
MOTION by Dooley, second by Preece, to adjourn at 9: 14 p,m. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
;~~~;h-?~
,-/
Cynthia Muller
Executive Assistant
D- AFT
DOCUMENTATION SUPPORTING HERITAGE LANDMARK
DESIGNATION OF THE MIDDLE CREEK HISTORIC CEMETERY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE PRESBYTERIAN CEMETERY
Heritage Landmark Planning Report
Prepared by Robert C, Vogel
Preservation Planning Consultant
September 26, 2002
INTRODUCTION
This report documents the historical and architectural significance of the Middle
Creek Historic Cemetery, commonly known as the Presbyterian Cemetery and makes the
case for the property's eligibility for designation as a Farmington Heritage Landmark
pursuant to ~2-11-4 ofthe Farmington City Code.
Farmington Heritage Landmarks are the buildings, sites, and districts so
designated by the City Council . in recognition of their historical, architectural,
archeological, and cultural significance, Properties are nominated by Heritage Landmark
designation by the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) following a public hearing.
Under state law, the Minnesota Historical Society must also review each nomination.
Once a property has been designated a Fatmington Heritage Landmark, this report
becomes part of the official designation and is used to guide planning for the
preservation, protection, and use of the' historic property.
The Heritage Landmark Planning Report is based on the National Register of
Historic Places Registration Form, For more information about registration standards and
guidelines for preparing the report, please refer to the National Park Service publication,
How to Complete ,the National Register Registration Form; and the Historic Preservation
chapter ofthe City.of Farmington Comprehensive Plan,
:" I, " , .ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
Name of Property: The official name of the property nominated for landmark
designation is the MIddle Creek Hi~oric Cemetery. The site is also commonly known as
the Presbyterian Cemetery, \ \
Location: Southeast quarter of Section 25, Township 114 North Range 20 West,
irhmedjatelynorth of the Middle Creek Estates subdivision.
I '
',1 ,;1 J
Owner: On December 17, 2001, the Farmington City Council accepted the
cemetery from the First United Presbyterian Church, the owner of record (Resolution
Rl14-01),
DRAFT
HPC Determination of Eligibility: The Farmington Heritage Preservation
Commission evaluated the cemetery and found that it meets the criteria for heritage
landmark eligibility, A fInding of significance was issued by the HPC on De~IP,be,~,,6,
2001. ,,',1 , (t ,",; ~
State Historic Preservation Office Review: In accordance with Minnesota Statutes
g471.193, the Minnesota Historical Society will be sent a copy of this report for review
and comment before the nomination is heard by the ~arhungtbn,Cit~ Council. ,
Classification: For preservation planning purpose~,the property is conside,red a
historic site. ; \'
'; 11 'd
Historic and Current Function/Use: HistoricalIy, ,the sit~ ~~ u~d as a cemetery.
It currently functions as open space. "
DESCRIPTION
'/' ,
Site Classification: Abandont1d rural cemetery.
, ,
, ,
Boundaries: The boundaries of the heritage landmark are those of the parcel
historically associated with the cemetery.
Narrative Description:
/ '
The historic cemetery is situated on the summit of low, wooded hill (elev. 956 ft.
above sea level) near the intersection of Akin Road and Eve's Way, immediately north of
the Middle Creek Estates Subdivision. The burial ground encompasses a rectangular
shaped parcel measuring approximately 264 by 165 ft. and oriented east-west.
Historically, the site was unplatted but removed from routine farming activities. It was in
use until the early twentieth century, when it was abandoned and fell into neglect. It does
not appear to have been enclosed with any kind of fence. The traditional nineteenth
century graveyard ornamental trees, such as pines or cedars, are absent and there is no
evidence of any hedgerows, shrubbery, or grave plantings. Near the center of the historic
site there is a small open area with a cluster of stone grave makers and scattered
fragments of broken gravestones, The largest of these is a marble tablet inscribed in low
relief with the names of Charles Seward, S. Anderson, and Caroline Seward. The other
stones and stone fragments lack readable inscriptions. The is evidence of an old trail or
lane leading to the cemetery from Akin Road, but at present public access to the site is
over a pedestrian trail from the city's Pine Knoll lift station.
Information about the persons interred at the cemetery is sketchy. According to
the 1881 narrative history of Dakota County, the fIrst burial, that of Ada Bacon, occurred
in 1859, and in June, 1868, the plot of land was donated by Samuel Osborne to the
Trustees of the Farmington Presbyterian Church for use as a cemetery. Charles Seward's
obituary in the March 8, 1901, issue of the Dakota County Tribune, notes that he was
2
~ ".
DAFT
buried in the "old cemetery in Judson's Grove." The obituary written for his wife, Jane
Osborne Seward, printed in the Tribune on November 13, 1903, states that she was
"interred in the Presbyterian cemetery" alongside her husband and two of their children,
The cemetery is located on the map of Farmington published in 1896 but it does not
appear on any modem topographical or street map. Local genealogists have documented
at least twenty-four burials, including several members of the Seward and Witherell
families, and suggest that the cemetery was no longer used after about 1906. The site is
visible as a clearing surrounded by farmland on an aerial photograph flown in 1937 and
the cemetery is noted on the Farmington Quadrangle USGS topographic map published
in 1974. A grave robber is purported to have disturbed at least one grave in 1980,
Except for occasional notice in local newspapers and a brief article in the county
historical society's newsletter, the cemetery was largely forgotten until 2001, when
Arcon Development and D. R. Horton proposed to build a residential subdivision called
Middle Creek Estates on a 40.74 acre parcel west of Akin Road, The abandoned
cemetery appeared on the site plan as an unregistered parcel of vacant land adjacent to
the north boundary of the subdivision. The Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed
the Middle Creek Estates preliminary plat application and on October 18, 2001,
recommended that the developer survey the cemetery, stake the boundaries, and fence the
site as a condition of plat approval. When the Council approved the preliminary plat on
December 17, 2001, a contingency of approval stated that the developer had to "re-survey
the cemetery site to ensure no additional markers lie outside the property and to identifY
the property comers."
EVALUATION
Applicable Heritage Landmark Criteria: The Middle Creek Cemetery is eligible
for Heritage Landmark designation because of its documented association with specific
patterns of events which have made a significant contribution to Farmington history (City
Code S2-11-4A),
Local Historic Context: The property was evaluated within the local historic
context, "Churches and Cemeteries," as delineated in the 1995 historic context study,
Area ofSignific~nce: Social history.
Period of Significance: 1859 to ca. 1906.
Narrative Statement of Significance:
The Middle Creek Cemetery is a vernacular landscape site that was used as a
burial ground by residents of Farmington between 1859 and ca, 1906. Evaluated within
the local historic context "Churches and Cemeteries," it is historically significant for its
aSsociation with the First Presbyterian Church (est. 1865) and the broad pattern of
nineteenth century cultural values and funerary practices in rural Farmington. The site is
distinguishable from its surroundings by the presence of gravestones and shallow
depressions in the surface of the ground which are interpreted as graves. Its historic
3
.' -
DRAFT
function as a cemetery has also influenced the character and composition of surrounding
development, both agricultural (1850s through 1960s) and suburban (1970s to the
present).
,
The Middle Creek Cemetery is a representative example of the small buri~l
grounds which are scattered across Minnesota's rural landscape. As a cultural relic, the
site represents a distinctive folk tradition and helps to tell the stories of the area's earliest
settlers and their rural way of life, The rural setting is evocative. of the early period of
settlement and the surviving gravemarker is typical.. of the period. Interwoven with the
site's landscape history are the lives of the individuals who are buried there. ,
Heritage landmark designation is only a step in the preservation of the historic
site, which should be reclaimed for public use as conservancy open space. The Heritage
Preservation Commission has recommended that the burial ground be marked with four
freestanding masonry columns or obelisks, set approximately 100 ft. apart. The comers
should also be staked. Signs and markers would be helpful in informing visitors of the
site's historical significance and natural heritage, It should not be necessary to reset fallen
gravestones or replace lost monuments with new markers, though it is recommended that
the city remove all fallen tree branches, buckthorn, and other undesirable plant material.
Routine pruning of trees and shrubs, weeding, and mowing are the keys to historic site
maintenance and the natural beauty of the site could be enhanced through appropriate
landscaping, Well maintained site and appropriate interpretation will demonstrate the
city's commitment to preserving a respectable environment for public use. The Secretary
of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties are the required basis
for historic site preservation and rehabilitation work, and the National Park Service has
also issued guidelines for the treatment of cultural landscapes which are applicable to
historic cemeteries.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
"The Abandoned Cemetery of Farmington Village." Over the Years vol. 32 (Winter
1992),
Agricultural Adjustment Administration. Dakota County, Minnesota, aerial survey
photographs, 1937. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota,
Birnbaum, Charles A., and Christine Capella Peters. The Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for the Treatment
of Cultural Landscapes. Washington: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park
Service, 1996,
History of Dakota County and the City of Hastings, Including the Explorers and Pioneers
of Minnesota, by Rev, Edward D. Neill, and Outlines of the History of Minnesota, by
J Fletcher Williams, Minneapolis: North Star Pub. Co., 1881.
4
DRAFT
Pinkney, B. F. Plat Book of Dakota County, Minnesota. Philadelphia: Union Publishing
Co" 1896,
Potter, Elizabeth Walton and Beth M. Boland. Guidelines for Evaluating and Registerif!g
Cemeteries and Burial Places. National Register Bulletin 41. Washington: U~.
Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1992.
Sloan, David Charles. The Last Great Necessity: Cemeteries. in American History.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991:
V ogel, Robert C. Farmington Historic Context Document: Final Report of the Historic
Context Study, 1994-1995. Unpublished report prepared for the,; Farmington Heritage
Preservation Commission, July, 1995,
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
I, USGS Farmington Quadrangle topographic map.
2. Middle Creek Estates site plan. ,
3. Photographs of historic site,
5
i'
~ 968 '
--f"
.J"
...el Plt__
-, .
.1-
lI)
;j9~
..~~\ /
1;:0\ ',,- /
"r)x~
It' ,/ \
II/',,-
,.If -'> '
/ "
/
9'6
4943OOOm.N.
35
,"
/
/
'.
"
Gravel Pit'
925
T 114 N
/~~
...'"
~::>
eg
Il.
<<
i::
XII
.* '\:~c~?~,,!.
?!L _ _ oF3~,!i? !o~.er
Cl
Cl:
CD
Cl
~
~
...
o
~
ii:
?OCKJ
5W
~4 000
'86
1 MilE
GI[OLOG'C"'~ SUl'IIVEY. AI[STON. VIRGINIA 1993
.89....,E. ! CASTLE ROCK 6 MI,
l FARIBAUL T 25 MI.
ROAD CLASSI FICATION
~L MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS
OLOGICAL SURVEY
1 RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092 Revisions shown in purple and woodland compiled in cooperation with
,NO SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST State of Minnesota agencies from aerial photographs taken 1990
and other sources, Contours not revised, This information
not field checked, Map edited 1993
Purple tint indicates extension of urban areas
Ec
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
Primary highway,
hard surface.
Secondary highway,
hard surface '
o Interstate Route
Light-duty road, hard or
improved surface
'1>
.....'1,.
"'..0
~"""O<-'<:)
\S'~~
'000
5000
6000 . 7000 FEET
1 ~llOME~t~E ~)
II If ,;/ ~,
t'"
VAL 10 FEET
'T 5.FOOT CONTOURS
"GAL DATUM OF 1929
Unimproved road ""'.."
o U. S, Route 0 State Route
FARMINGTON, MINN,
NW/<4 FARMINGTON IS' QUADRANGLE
44093-F2-TF-024
1974
REVISED 1993
DMA 7373 II NW . SERIES V872
.*.. I' un n tlUIlI
:~t: ;1 !!H ;IJ H"m
I ~ ! lB} J!~ Halll
I'. h tlrln! JUt'ill
It II HI'1I111
P I r! It. hj~~ t
l i' t lllll;l JII.!}II'
I I II II llld
I Ilr I' 'tf III
;V t II. .~ 'II~i
M '
III
,jl
In
Ii
Ii
ft
u
~~!!i! ~ ~~ I il ~ iriil
~ s 8 II !ill
~~:I:I~j ~ ![ ~
I :I.. (") I I IS II
lll!l ^ ~~
:1:1 VI ::z: - ~~"
m ~ il:;;l~
i I '" ~
Q
Ii i
I I
..
~
\ ~3~ i
\ ~b
~J~I
!!'" ,
,
,
,
'\ ,...----:-...---
\ \ ,,-,,' ..-...--
il L/~=~./.~../ ~""',/
"---/ ~
i. I
~
p
I
r
I
...-..-......
! \
8=
~~ ~
~ \
,., If
,.,
-t
I I
III \
;;:1
."
~ \
~I \
n
~
~ JJH.
~ ~!;
.... /
!I:
,.,
Z
:< ,,/
z
r>
I
!I:
<5
0
f;;
g
~
,.,
Vl
-t
>
;;:1
Vl
I
~
I ! l ~ ~ · rill I! 11 t,~ I
I ! 1 n . , · \ u Ii! U H~ I ~
1!II~i'iii!iip~i ~
j'lli,nqilli~
~
~ -
...
! J
~
..
.,
" ~ ~
! ~-oo
L____ - ::::0 0
Zrrlr
G)rrrl
-I~o
0-
zZ::::O
v )> rrl
:::>",,::::Orrl
~-<^
Z
z-orrl
rrlr(/)
tf))>-I
oz)>
-1(/)-1
)> U1
:-J?l!J':I"!--'t-J;--
O"U"U"UfTI"U(") VI
fTI;o;o;o~;oo I
~~~~~~;i'i ~
F3:3:3:z3:;o --i
VlZZZClZVI
~~~8~Ri ~
-<-<-<z-<~ Q
rcClO"U
~::!~::i~1
OCOO--iVl
~~zB5 ~
>"UCl
~~~ ~
"Uz> z
~ z
z
MIDDLE CREEK ESTATES
DRAFT
MVC-001F.JPG 2002/05/16 18:25:06
DRAFT
MVC-010F.JPG 2002/05/16 18:56:36
;
DRAFT
MVC-003F.JPG 2002/05/16 18:25:44
Proposed Amendments
Section 10-2-1: Definitions (add)
Bed and Breakfast: means an owner occupied historically designated residential structure
used as a lodging establishment where a guestroom or guestrooms are rented on a nightly
basis and in which only breakfast is included as part of the basic compensation.
Bed and Breakfast Unit: A room or group of rooms forming a single habitable unit used
or intended to be used for living and sleeping, but not for cooking or eating purposes.
Section 10-5-6: R-1 Low Density Residential District
Conditional Use (add)
Bed and Breakfast
Section 10-5-7: R-2 Low/Medium Density Residential District
Conditional Use (add)
Bed and Breakfast
Section 10-5-11: R-T Downtown Transitional Mixed Use District
Conditional Use (add)
Bed and Breakfast
Section 10-5-12: R-D Downtown Residential District
Conditional Use (add)
Bed and Breakfast
(Add)
10-6-23: Bed and Breakfast Standards:
(A) Intent and Purpose: The City recognizes that bed and breakfasts are an asset to the
community and help the preservation of historic homes because the expense of
owning and maintaining historic homes has made them less suitable for single-
family dwellings. Conversion of historic houses into multifamily uses is usually
determined by the neighborhood where it is located. It is therefore the intention
of the city to limit bed and breakfast uses to those homes where the use would
benefit the surrounding area by allowing appropriate adaptive reuse of historic
dwellings. Bed and breakfasts are allowed by a conditional use permit, subject to
the conditions provided under 10-3-5 and the following conditions in the R-1, R-
2, R- T and R-D zoning districts as regulated in this section, subject to the
conditions outlined in section B.
(B) Bed and Breakfast Standards:
1. The home is listed on the National Historic Register, designated on the City's
list as a Farmington Heritage Landmark or identified as a historically
significant property by the Heritage Preservation Commission.
2. The bed and breakfast residence must be owner occupied.
3. At least two off-street parking spaces must be provided onsite for the owner or
manager and one additional parking space per rental unit. Parking spaces shall
be hard surfaced with concrete or asphalt and shall be well-drained, stripped,
and numbered.
4. The dining facilities must not be open to the public and must be used
exclusively by the registered guests unless allowed as a separate permitted or
special use.
5, Bed and breakfast uses must be located at least 300 feet apart (approximately
one block).
6. An identification sign not exceeding four square feet may be located on the
site. The sign must match the architectural features of the structure. The sign
may be located on the house or five feet from the property line. The sign may
not be illuminated.
7. A maximum of five bed and breakfast units may be established in a structure
and at least one original bedroom must be reserved by the homeowner(s).
8. The owner of the bed and breakfast shall maintain a guest register showing the
name, address, motor vehicle license number, and inclusive dates of visits of
all guests. No guest shall be permitted to rent accommodations or remain in
occupancy for a period in excess of fourteen (14) calendar days during any
consecutive ninety day (90) day period.
9. The structure and performance of the operation of the bed and breakfast and
residence shall comply with all local, county, and state regulations.
10, The Planning Commission may modify standards or require additional
standards which are site specific in order to assure the compatibility of the bed
and breakfast activities with the neighborhood in which it is located.
11, The Planning Commission reserves the right to review the conditional use
permit annually and either continue or modify the conditions of the permit.
(Andrea Poehler, City Attorney, recommended that the City cannot, on its own
initiative, modify CUPs that have already been granted, If the City wants to
I r
impose certain conditions on such facilities and review them annually, it
should license B & B 's and have licenses renewed annually).
12. The Planning Commission reserves the right to terminate the conditional use
permit any time the owner fails to adhere to the standards or conditions
established by this Section or contained in the conditional use permit.
Other recommendations from the City Attorney to consider:
~ The facility shall have a state license for hotel and food, and comply with building
and fire codes as may be required or applicable,
~ Must meet a certain minimum square footage, or comply with minimum lot size for
district,
~ All rental units must be established within the principal structure.
~ Compliance with applicable screening and landscaping requirements,