HomeMy WebLinkAbout01.22.91 Council Packet AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
JANUARY 22, 1991
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVE AGENDA
3. APPROVE MINUTES
a. January 7, 1991 - Regular
4. CITIZENS COMMENTS
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. 1991 CDBG Application
7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
a. Consider Bids - Fire Department Mini Pumper
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Appointments to Boards and Commissions
b. Sewer Bill Adjustment - Farmington Car Wash
c. VRWMO Southeast Area Storm Sewer Project Public Hearing
d. Council Workshops
e. Assessment Roll Amendment - Project 89-3 - Alice Falls
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Donation by the American Legion and VFW
b. Personnel Policy - Employee Contact
c. Sewer Service Fee Refund - 1006 3rd Street
10. MISCELLANEOUS
a. Demolition of McVicker Building
b. Speed Limit Signs - Alleys between 3rd and 4th and Spruce and Walnut Streets
c. Utility Permit Ordinance
11. CONSENT AGENDA
a. School/Conference Request - Public Works
b. School/Conference Request - Police Department
c. School/Conference Request - Police Department
d. School/Conference Request - Administration
e. School/Conference Request - Solid Waste
f. Approve Payment of the Bills
12. ADJOURN
AGENDA REQUEST FORM 6a.
ITEM NO.
NAME: Jerry Henricks
DEPARTMENT: HRA
DATE: January 15, 1991
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1991
CATEGORY: Petitions, Requests and Communications
SUBJECT: 1991 CDBG Application
EXPLANATION: Consider Proposals and Priorities
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Application - Jerry Henricks
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Development Committee
k"v\-12-14-A-LiCia)
SIGNATURE
Or'
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
DATE: JANUARY 17, 1991
As you are aware, the City of Farmington is an Entitlement City in respect to
the CDBG funds. As an entitlement city, the city shares funds from CDBG on a
biannual basis with three other cities, Lakeville, Rosemount and Hastings. In
1991 Farmington's share of CDBG funds will be $91,200.
I would like the City Council to review two requests for CDBG funding for 1991.
The first priority is the purchase of the Raymond and Doreen Larson property
located at 213 Oak Street. The purpose for this property acquisition is to
eliminate the easements on the Exchange Bank Building property. Various developers
who have expressed an interest in rehabilitation of the Exchange Bank Building
have suggested that the easements create major obstacles for their rehabilitation
efforts. If the Larson property at 213 Oak Street was acquired, this easement
problem would be eliminated. The easements mentioned above are the 9 foot stair-
ways access for the Larson's to their living quarters above the former Larson
Electric Store and a 25 foot easement in the backyard of the Larson building.
The second priority is the acquisition of the Hilda Larson property at 109 Elm
Street. This property is located in the area commonly referred to as Elm Park.
By acquiring the Larson property, residential slum and blighted conditions in
the area would be eliminated. This would assist in the success of the Elm Park
project by reducing TIF funds necessary in the acquisition process. Hilda Larson's
property is an important element in the Elm Park project.
The financial breakdown of these proposals are as follows:
1. Ray and Doreen Larson property
213 Oak Street
Estimated Acquisition Cost $72,700.
Closing Costs 3,500.
Relocation 15,000.
TOTAL $91,200.
2. Hilda Larson Property
109 Elm Street
Estimated Acquisition Cost $68,000.
Closing costs and appraisal 2,500.
Relocation 17,000.
Demolition/Clearance 3,700.
TOTAL $91,200.
It should be understood by the Council that by including both properties on the
application form, the City Council can reverse the priority should the need
arise.
The Dakota County HRA is requesting that the City of Farmington sign an
agreement requiring the City to repay the CDBG funds should no progress on the
renovation of the Ray Larson building occur within 2 years of the time CDBG
funds have been provided to the City. Kari Gill stated the reimbursement could
be delayed if the City could illustrate that development efforts had occurred.
A time schedule for the CDBG application process is as follows:
Date Event
1. January 24, 1991 City passes resolution approving application
for the CDBG funds.
2. January 25, 1991 Dakota County HRA gathers CDBG application
forms and prepares preliminary statements.
3. January 25, 1991 - Environmental review prepared and published.
February 22, 1991
4. February 7, 1991 Preliminary statement is published with Notice
of Public Hearing.
5. February 26, 1991 Public Hearing held and Final Statement and
Request for Release of Funds approved by the
County Board.
6. March 1, 1991 - HUD review period, also submitted for comments
March 31, 1991 to Metro Council and State Planning.
7. April 9 or 16, 1991 Grant agreement between Dakota County and HUD
executed. Grant funds released.
8. Mid April, 1991 Funds become available for local projects.
Please recognize that this is a tentative schedule with the possibility of
date changes. An example, the City of Farmington 1989 CDBG monies was not
available for the City until May of 1989.
The CDBG application must be completed, approved by the City Council and
submitted to the Dakota County HRA by January 24, 1991. The actual date of
application submittal to HUD for funding is February 1991 by Dakota County.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact me.
-tb4A(LaL a . %1t)"
Gerald A. Henricks 441 l
HRA Executive Director
GAH/sm
cc: HRA Members
Ernie Darflinger
Larry Thompson
Development Committee
file
PROPOSED
RESOLUTION
APPROVING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991
1. 213 OAK STREET
2. 109 ELM STREET
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 22nd
day of January, 1991 at 7:00 P.M.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent :
Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Housing and Community Development legislation, Dakota
County is eligible for HUD Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement funding
as an urban county; and
WHEREAS, local units of government within Dakota County are to receive CDBG funds for
eligible projects as defined by State and Federal laws; and
WHEREAS, one of the goals and objectives of the Farmington Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA) under the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act is the elimination
of blighted, deteriorated or deteriorating areas located within the City of Farmington,
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the HRA desires to undertake a program utilizing Community Development Block
Grant funds involving the elimination of blighted and deteriorated areas, including the
property legally described as:
1. West 30 feet of the following: Part of Lots 4 and 5, Block 22, commencing
Southeast corner Lot 5, West 100 feet, North 70 feet, East 20 feet, South
1 foot, East 80 feet to East line, Lot 5, South 69 feet to beginning.
2. Lot 9, Block 18.
located within the City of Farmington in Dakota County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, such property is presently located within the City's redevelopment district.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The real property described above constitutes a blighted or deteriorated area
in that such property includes a building which, by reason of dilapidation,
obsolescence, faulty arrangement or design, obsolete layout, or a combination
of these or other factors, is detrimental to the safety, health, morals or
welfare of the City of Farmington, Minnesota.
2. The expenditure of Community Development Block Grant funds to eliminate such
blight and deterioration is beneficial to and in the best interest of the
residents of the City of Farmington, Minnesota.
3. The attached Community Development Block Grant Proposal is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
execute the appropriate documents.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session
on the 22nd day of January, 1991.
Dakota County
Community Development Block Grant Proposal
Fiscal Year 1990
City of Farmington HRA Development District
Legal Name of Applicant Community Development
District
325 Oak Street
Legal Address of Applicant
Farmington Minnesota 55024
City State Zip
Gerald A. Henricks
Contact Person
FHRA Executive Director 612 ) 463-7111
Title Phone Number
1. Ray & Doreen Larson Building Acquisition/Renovation
2. Hilda Larson Residence Acquisition/Demolition
Project Name
1. Acquisition of the Ray and Doreen Larson building, renovation and potential
future use of building, elimination of restrictive easements on the Exchange
Bank buildinz.
2. Acquisition/Demolition of Hilda Larson residence, elimination of a blighted
condition, prepare site for potential future use.
Brief Description of Project
$91.200.
Amount Requested
1. Has this project received funding CDBG before?
u Yes u No
2. Project duration:
uOne Year
El Other (Specify) :
Proposed beginning date: 6-1-91 Proposed completion date: 12-31-91
3. Grant funds will be used for:
j Acquisition
ux Clearance Activities
u Disposition
El Economic Development
El Planning
El Public Facilities
El Public Services
F1 Rehabilitation
Other (Specify) : Relocation
4. Federal objective addressed (attach documentation) :
El Benefit to low and moderate income persons
El Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight
I:1 Alleviation of urgent community development need
5. General description of the project (include project goals and importance to
community) :
1. Ray and Doreen Larson buildings 213 Oak Street, controls several access easements
to the Exchange Bank building, on the National Registry, which restrict the abiilty
of the City of Farmington to encourage developers to rehabilitate the Exchange
Bank Building. Thereby preventing the future potential utilization of the Exchange
Bank Building. By purchasing_ the Ray & Doreen Larson buildings the easement would
be eliminated and rehabilitation of both buildings would be possible. Also, the
Larson building is of a similar architectural style as the Exchange Bank Building.
2. The acquisition/demolition of the Hilda Laron residence would assist in the
elimination of a blighted condition. The Hilda Larson residence is within the HRA
Redevelopment District. Several of the blighted structures in this area, Elm Park,
have been acquired and demolished. The acquisition/demolition of the Hilda Larson
residence, 109 Elm STreet, would have one remaining substandard structure to be
acquired/demolished. This remaining structure will be acquired by the Farmington
HRA in the future providing the opportunity to encourage future development
activity in this area.
Should the City/HRA be unable to encourage a developer to enter into an agreement
for rehabilitation of the building, the City would propose to redirect the CDBG
funds to the acquisition of the property at 109 Elm Street.
-
.
6. Description of project area (attach map) :
1. W. 30 ft of the following: Pt of lots 4 & 5, block 22 commencing from
the SE corner of lot 5 W 100 ft N 70 ft E 20 ft S 1 ft E 80 ft to E line
of lot 5 S 69 ft to beginning, lot 5, block 22.
2. Lot 9. Block 18
7. Persons benefiting:
1.2
Total number of persons benefiting: 2.1
Percentage of low/moderate income: 1.0
2.1 %
8. Construction schedule:
ill Not Applicable
Applicable
If applicable:
Estimated date construction will begin:
Estimated date construction will be completed:
9. Project cost:
Total project cost: $ 91,200.
Amount of C.D. Grant requested: $ 91,200.
(Percentage of total project cost) : 100
Source and amount of other revenue:
10. Budget summary by activity:
Activity CDBG Other/List Source Total
1. Acquisition $ 72,700. $ $ 72,700.
Closing costs & appraisal 3,500. 3,500.
Relocation 15,000. 15,000.
TOTAL $91,200.
$ 91,200.
2. Acquisition $68,000. $ 68,000.
Closing costs & appraisal 2,500. 2,500.
Relocation 17,000. 17,000.
Demolition/Clearance 3,700. 3,700
TOTAL $91,200.
$ 91,200.
1
- 3 -
11. Additional supporting items submitted with proposal (check if attached) :
D. Benefit documentation (see question 4)
u Resolution of governing body requesting grant
LI— Additional project information
uMap or sketch outlining project area
Q Professional 's certification of feasibility and accuracy of scope and
budget (engineer's, architect's, etc.)
LI Letters in support of project/or letters of commitment
Q Other (Specify) :
Certification
I certify that the statements and application requirements of this official pro-
posal are correct and that this proposal contains no misrepresentation or falsi-
fications, omissions or concealment of material facts and that the information
given is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that no
bids have been awarded, contract executed , or construction begun on the proposed
project.
January 22, 1991
Sign ure of/Auth ized Official Date
City Administrator
Title
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. a
NAME: Daniel M. Siebenaler
DEPARTMENT: Police
DATE: January 3 , 1991
MEETING DATE: January 21 , 1991
CATEGORY: New Business
SUBJECT: Donation by American Legion and VFW
EXPLANATION: Donation of cash towards purchase and service of
a cellular telephone for the Farmington Police Department .
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: See Memo
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson City Administrator
Wayne Henneke Finance Director
SIGNATURE
MEMO TO: Mayor and Council
SUBJECT: Donations
DATE : January 3 , 1991
In the past the City Council has encouraged staff members to
seek alternative financing for project and Capital Improvement
items.
One item appropriate for such contribution is the cellular
telephone indicated in the five year C.I .P . for the police
department.
I have approached the Farmington VFW and have requested them
to purchase and donate a cellular phone to the police depart-
ment. The VFW has generously donated $750. to pay for that
phone.
When considering a cellular phone system, equipment is only
one part of the expense . Ongoing service and maintenance is
a major consideration.
I approached the Farmington American Legion and requested an
amount equal to two years of service and maintenance. The
American Legion has also generously contributed $700.
The cellular phone is a valuable tool in law enforcement, in
that it allows an officer to spend more time on the street .
Such things as juvenile problems , public assists and inter-
agency communication are completed on the street .
I believe a cellular phone will be a valuable addition to
our equipment inventory.
I recommend the Farmington City Council accept the generous
contributions of the American Legion and the VFW of Farmington.
I also request authorization to follow through with the
purchase and installation of the cellular phone.
If you have any questions , feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
Adib
Daniel M. Siebenaler
Chief of Police
DMS/m