Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.03.91 Council Packet AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR JUNE 3, 1991 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. APPROVE MINUTES a. May 16, 1991 b. May 20, 1991 4. CITIZENS COMMENTS 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Zoning Ordinance Amendments - Continued from May 20, 1991 b. 7: 15 P.M. - Zoning Amendments c. 7:15 P.M. - Consider Feasibility Report - Proposed Middle School d. 7:30 P.M. - Consider Preliminary Plat - Proposed Middle School 6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Property to HRA b. Local Option Sales Tax c. Consider County 5 Year CIP 7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS a. Relating to the Proposed Regional Airport 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Traffic Survey b. Project 87-7, Fairgrounds Sewer and Water c. Discussion of TIF for Elm Park 9. NEW BUSINESS a. Personnel - Park and Recreation Department 10. MISCELLANEOUS a. Award Seal Coat Project 91-8 b. Request to Build Lunch Room 11. CONSENT AGENDA a. Temporary 3.2 On-Sale License b. Establishing Annexation Fund of 1991, Fund #406 c. Resolution Calling for a Comprehensive Review of Superfund d. Capital Outlay Request - Arena e. Project 91-4, Building Demolition - Pay Estimate f. Project 90-1, Industrial Park g. Capital Outlay Request - Administration h. Capital Outlay Request - Administration i. Payment of Bills 12. ADJOURN 4 t AGENDA REQUEST FORM 5a, ITEM NO. NAME: Charles Tooker DEPARTMENT: Planning DATE: May 21, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 3, 1991 CATEGORY: Public Hearing SUBJECT: Consider Middle School Plat EXPLANATION: Per Council action on May 20, 1991 REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Planning Commission Minutes of 5/.x/91; Plat - Charlie Tooker REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Karen Finstuen Administration Charles Tooker Planning Development CommitteeL-IDISILLIA..? S MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: MIDDLE SCHOOL PLAT DATE: MAY 29, 1991 The Planning Commission approved the Middle School plat subject to a number of minor revisions. The School District representative has informed staff that the revised plat will be submitted some time on Thursday, at which time it will be distributed to the Council. It is not known at this time if staff (or the Council) will have adequate time to review the plat. Therefore, the hearing may have to be continued. I have also attached a standard development agreement along with the proposed fees. The Council should only approve the plat contingent upon the execution of a development agreement. The fees should be acknowledged as part of the public hearing. Also, the Council should determine if surety will be required for the public improvements. Surety was required for the Akin Road Elementary project. la Lr Thomps n City Administrator cc: Development Committee file JW1 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MAY 14, 1991 1. Chairman Hanson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Gramentz, Hanson, Rotty, Schlawin, Thelen. Members Absent: None. Also Present: Planner Tooker. 2. The Chairman asked for comments on the minutes of April 9, 1991. MOTION by Schlawin, second by Rotty to approve the minutes as presented. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. -" 3. Planner Tooker provided an introduction to the preliminary plat for Farmington Middle School situated in the NWi of Section 31 and the SWi of Section 30. He reviewed comments from the City Engineer in his memo of May 8th, as well as comments from the County Surveyor - Gary Stevenson, Parks and Recreation Director Jim Bell and Minnesota Soil and Water Conservation Urban Conservationist - Steve Kernik. In general, many of the comments have already been incorporated into the plat. One remaining discrepancy is the additional land to the north which must be added to the plat to accommodate the long curve for 208th Street. Landscape architect, Andrew Matzke, indicated that the main entrance will be designed with one 16 foot wide entry drive and two 12 foot wide exit drives, separated by a 24 foot wide median. He also described the visitor parking lot with 30 parking spaces and the bus entrance. He indicated that while the proposed tennis courts will require some fill within the flood plain, the site plan compensates for this by creating comparable cut areas to accommodate the proposed water displacement. This will be reviewed by the Department of Natural Resources. Member Rotty was concerned that the bike path proposed on the south side of the right of way of 208th Street would get more use, or conflicting use, between pedestrians headed for school and bikes out for a long ride. Superintendent Ruberto agreed that the School District would prefer placing the bike path on the north side of the street or, in effect, reversing the recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Director. The reason, from his point of view, had to do with ease of winter maintenance for a concrete walk compared with a bituminous trail. Mr. Ruberto also indicated that the School District will ask the City Council for reduced storm water management fees and provided commission members with a copy of his letter requesting the same. He indicated his appreciation for the cooperative spirit he found among the City staff in working toward the implementation of this project. MOTION by Rotty, second by Gramentz to forward a recommendation for approval of the preliminary plat of Farmington Middle School to the City Council subject to the comments received from the City Parks, Engineering and Planning staff. The motion also includes a recommendation that the staff review its proposal for a bike trail on the south side of 208th Street with i an eye toward reversing the location of the concrete sidewalk and the bituminous trail. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 4. Planner Tooker introduced Elm Park by describing the variety of actions that will be required by the Planning Commission if the current HRA proposal is to be implemented. The site will need to be rezoned, platted and a conditional use applied for in order for the development to proceed. He introduced HRA Director Jerry Henricks, who outlined the general schedule of activity including creation of a new Tax Increment Financing District by June 17, 1991, commencing construction in October and completing construction in April of 1992. This brought up questions about the adult housing project on Oak Street and the likely disposition of the two parcels north of relocated Main Street. He said that 4Jc'v adult housing will commence at the same time the business portion of Elm Park begins with a tentative completion date in June of 1992. He also indicated that the family housing proposed to the north of the business development will not proceed until further investigation of the possible soil contamination in that area and the extent to which any such contamination might drive up the cost of the project. Additional discussion revolved around concerns about access for retail customers from Elm Street and to the service court on relocated Main Street. Elm Street access may be too close to the railroad crossing and First Street access could cause problems for residents in the apartment complex, if it is built, when semi trucks are backing into the More 4 loading docks. Mr. Henricks thanked the Commission for the opportunity to outline the proposal as it has developed. 5. Planner Tooker reviewed the proposed Zoning ordinance amendments related to mailed notice for Conditional Use and Variance Requests, the addition of Radio and TV Towers to Conditional Uses allowable within the F-3 General Flood Plain District and additional language regarding the height of fences in front yards when side by side houses have different setbacks. Most of the discussion revolved around the issue of increased fees for variances, conditional uses and zoning amendments raised in the staff memo of May 6,1991. Chairman Hanson suggested that perhaps the City staff could determine the property owners within 350 feet of projects under discussion rather than requiring an abstractor's certificate. Member Rotty asked about mailing costs and wondered if the new procedure would justify an increase of $50.00 per application. Tooker responded that already the fees being charged for planning services to the public are low compared to the amount of work that is involved, but that he had not documented actual out of pocket costs. Chairman Hanson suggested that the ordinance could be changed but that fees could remain as they currently are until the City Council reviews all fees at the beginning of the year. MOTION by Schlawin, second by Thelen to forward the proposed ordinance amendment to the City Council with the recommendation that it be approved. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 6. Member Rotty said that he had been asked by a local business person about the people who regularly appear to be selling flowers on weekends at the inter- section of Highway 50 and County Road 31. It was suggested that staff look into the problem since it appears to put local business people at a disadvantage. 7. There being no further business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at 8:50 P.M. . Submitted by, 144) /AL-, Charles Tooker Planner Approved CTT/mh PROPOSED RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING OF FINAL PLAT — FARMINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL — Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 3rd day of June, 1991 at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, the preliminary plat of the Farmington Middle School is now before the Council for review and approval; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held in the matter on the 3rd day of June, 1991 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper on the 23rd day of May, 1991 and proper notice sent to surrounding property owners as per Exhibit A on file; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended favorable action by the Council after receiving and evaluating comments from various parties; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be feasibly served by municipal services. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above preliminary plat be approved and the requisite signatures be authorized and directed to be affixed to the final plat with the following stipulations: A. Receipt of a signed, notarized statement from the preparer that final plat is identical to the preliminary plat, as approved. B. The developer execute a developer's agreement which shall set forth various conditions including the amount of $ determined as the cash in lieu of park land contribution, $ for storm sewer charges and $ for water charges. C. The developer reimburse the City for all engineering, administrative, legal and SWCD costs. D. The developer agrees to furnish the City one reproducible and one reduced reproducible copy of the filed plat in accordance with Title 11, Chapter 3, Section 4 of the City Code. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 3rd day of June, 1991. FEE SUMMARY FARMINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL Land Area - 2,796,156 sq. ft. = 64. 19 acres Pre Plat Surety 3,000.00 (paid) Pre Plat Administration 509.00 (paid) Surface Water Management @ .0780/sf 218,100. 16 [24,804.00] (less pond) Recommended by Staff 193,296.00 Water Main Trunk (2A2) @ 1460/acre 93,717.40 Erosion & Sediment Control @ $30.00/acre 1,925.70 Water Quality Management 1,476.37 Sewer (110 units x 650) 71,500.00 Sewer Connection Permit 40.00 per connection Water Connection Permit 40.00 per connection Reserve Capacity Connection (WAC) 3/4 of 1" 481.00 1}" 752.00 1}" 1,083.00 2" 1,925.00 4" 7,326.00 Meter Charge 3/4" 74.52 1}" 640.00 3" 1,572.00 Building Permit per 1988 DBC Park Land Dedication .00 DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (City Installed Improvements) AGREEMENT dated (day) (month) (year) by and between the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (City) and (name) , (the Developer) . 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for (development name) (also referred to in this Agreement as the "plat") . The land is legally described as: 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition (1) that the Developer enter into this Agreement, (2) that the Developer provide the necessary security in accordance with the terms of this Agreement guaranteeing the payment of the first two years' special assessments, including interest and principal, for public improvements and guaranteeing compliance with the terms of this Agreement. 3. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all City, County, Metropolitan, State and Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow any construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 4. Development Exhibits. The Developer shall develop the plat in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. The plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Agreement, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Plat/Staging Plan Plan B - Soil Erosion and Grading Plan Plan C - Preliminary Engineering Report Plan D - Landscaping Requirements 5. Phased Development. The plat shall be developed in (number) phases in accordance with Plan A. No earth moving or other development shall be done in any phase until final plats have been filed in the County Recorder's office and the necessary security has been furnished to the City for those phases. For purposes of this requirement, outlots shall not be deemed to have been final platted. The City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases until public improvements for all prior phases have been satisfactorily completed. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, this Development Contract constitutes approval to develop Phase (number). Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Agreements for such phases are approved by the City. 6. Effect of Subdivision Approval. For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications or platting required or permitted by the approved preliminary plat unless required by State or Federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by State Law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan (including removing unplatted property from the urban service area) , official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement and may require submission of a new plat. 7. Public Improvements. The City shall design and construct the Phase I public improvements set forth in Exhibit C. 8. Assessment of Costs. The City shall assess the cost of the public improvements referred to in Paragraph 7 above, together with administrative, planning, engineering, capitalized interest, legal and bonding costs against the land in Phase I. The assessments shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The assessments shall be paid over a 10 year period without deferment, together with interest at a rate set by the City. Before the City issues a Certificate of Occupancy for a structure built on a lot, however, all of the aforementioned assessments against the lot must be paid in full. The Developer waives -any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation of the public improvements and the assessments, including any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to MSA 429.081. 9. Security. The Developer shall furnish the City with an irrevocable letter of credit for $(amount). The bank and form of the letter of credit shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The letter of credit shall be. for 3 a term ending 90 days after the second half of the second year's special assessments are due and payable. The letter of credit shall secure' compliance with the terms of this Agreement and payment of the first two years' special assessments including principal and interest for all required public improvements. The City may draw down the letter of credit, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement. The amount of security was calculated as follows: Spec. Asmt/Imp. $ Erosion Control $ Spec. Asmt/Strm.Sew.Con.Chg. $ St. Signs $ Street Lights $ Monuments $ Grading $ 10. Storm Sewer. The Developer shall pay a storm sewer connection charge for Phase I of $(amount) in lieu of the property paying a like assessment at a later date. The charge shall be assessed against the property in Phase I over a 10 year period with 10% interest on the unpaid balance. The assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The assessments may be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to MSA 429.081. Storm sewer charges for subsequent phases shall be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at the time the Development Agreements for those phases are entered into. 11. Water Area The Developer shall pay a water area charge of $( ) for Phase I in lieu of the property paying a like assessment at a later date. The charge shall be assessed against the property in Phase I over a 10 year period with 10% interest on the unpaid balance. The assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The assessments may be assumed or prepaid at any time. The Developer waives any and all potential and substantive objections to the assessments including any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to MSA No. 429.081. Water area charges for subsequent phases shall be calculated and paid based upon requirements in effect at the time the Development Contracts for those phases are entered into. 12. Park Dedication. The Developer shall pay a cash contribution of $(amount) in satisfaction of the City's park dedication requirements for Phase I. The contribution shall be paid as follows: (schedule) Notwithstanding the above payment schedule, the cash contribution received by the City must at all times equal or exceed $(amount) times the number of homes for which building permits have been issued or the City may refuse to issue any additional building permits. Park dedication requirements for subsequent phases shall be calculated and based upon requirements in effect atthe time Development Agreements are entered into for those phases. 13. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all necessary work and/or inspections deemed appropriate by the City during the installation of public improvements by the City. The license shall expire after the public improvements installed pursuant to the development contract have been installed and accepted by the City. 5 14. Developer Installed Improvements. The Developer shall install to City standards. The design, placement and construction scheduling shall be approved by the City. 15. Warranty. The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of one (1) year after its completion and acceptance by the City. All landscaping including, but not limited to, trees, bushes, shrubs, grass and sod, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease free for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. Any replacements shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer shall post maintenance bonds or other security acceptable to the City to secure the warranties. 16. Grading Plan. The plat shall be graded and drainage provided by the Developer in accordance with the plans attached hereto as Exhibit B. 17. Landscaping. The Developer shall landscape the plat in accordance with the plans attached hereto as Exhibit C. The landscaping shall be accomplished in accordance with a time schedule approved by the City. 18. Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 19. Erosion Control. After the site is rough graded, but before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City or Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be oat seed. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City or the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. 20. Clean Up. The Developer shall promptly clear any soil, earth or debris resulting from construction work by the Developer or its agents or assigns. 21. Responsibility for Costs. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including, but not limited to, Soil and Water Conservation District. 7 charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, preparation of this Agreement, and all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering and attorney's fees. D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City within thirty (30) days after receipt. . If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of ()% per year. 22. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given written notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours, in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 23. Miscellaneous. A. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors or assigns, as the case may be. B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. C. If any portion, section , subsection , sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. D. No one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. 9 F. The Developer represents to the City to the best of its knowledge that the plat is not of "metropolitan significance" and that an environmental impact statement is not required. However, if the City or another governmental entity or agency determines that such a review is needed, the Developer shall prepare it in compliance with legal requirements so issued from said agency. The Developer er shall reimburse the City for all expenses, including staff time and attorney's fees, that the City incurs in assisting in the preparation of the review. G. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Agreement, at the Developer's request, the City will execute and deliver to the Developer a release. 24. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified or registered mail at the following address: (address). Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail or registered mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 attn: City Administrator 1 IN STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (day) , of (month) , (year) by (name) , Mayor and by (name) , City Administrator of the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority of the City Council. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (day) of (month), (year) by (name) the (title) of (company) , a Minnesota corporation on its behalf. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Grannis, Grannis, Farrell & Knutson, P.A. 403 Norwest Bank Building 161 North Concord Exchange So. St. Paul, MN 55075 (612) 455-1661 4 AGENDA REQUEST FORM17CL ITEM NO. NAME: Larry Thompson DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: May 21, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 3, 1991 CATEGORY: Ordinances and Resolutions SUBJECT: Relating to the Proposed Regional Airport EXPLANATION: Per Council directive REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Resolution - Larry Thompson REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Department Heads -.Mr._ SI ' MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: REGIONAL AIRPORT RESOLUTION DATE: MAY 29, 1991 Per Council directive, a proposed resolution has been placed on the agenda opposing the siting of a regional airport in southern Dakota County. Karen Finstuen attended an airport planning meeting while I was on vacation. I would like the time to review this information with her and prepare a report before I draft the resolution. This information should be available by this Friday. GO/ (/Larry Thom son City Administrator cc: file Karen Finstuen LT/mh MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: REGIONAL AIRPORT DATE: MAY 31, 1991 Per Council directive, I have attached a copy of a proposed resolution opposing the relocation of the regional airport in southern Dakota County and urging the expansion of the existing airport. Based on a recent County planning meeting attended by Karen Finstuen, I have included language which acknowledges Farmington will be impacted by the expansion of the existing airport. Apparently some northern Dakota County officials feel the southern cities do not realize that the construction of additional runways, most notably the North/South runway paralleling Cedar Avenue would increase noise levels in the southern cities. The Council should acknowledge the impact but note that the impact would not be as great as the relocation of the airport. As noted by the Council, Councilmember Derington will present the resolution at the June 3, 1991 MAC Airport meeting, so this resolution should be moved up in the agenda. /,4°12.7e44 Larry Thompson City Administrator cc: Development Committee file PROPOSE,,//D O / RESOLUTION 1� /q—cl ( OPPOSING THE RELOCATION OF THE REGIONAL AIRPORT IN SOUTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 3rd day of June, 1991 at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member Seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has mandated a dual-track strategy to preserve the region's options for meeting future airport capacity needs; and WHEREAS, this dual-track strategy is a well conceived effort designed to preserve the region's airport options for the future; and WHEREAS, the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport is a major employer for Farmington and the surrounding area, so any change in airport location would affect the economic health of the region and cause major disruption for existing businesses, highways and utilities; and WHEREAS, replacing the existing Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport with a new airport at another site would severly impact comprehensive land use plans, both at the present airport site and at any of the candidate search area sites; and WHEREAS, costsfor developing alternate uses for the current airport site if it is abandoned as a major airport must be considered; and WHEREAS, selecting either the Dakota-Scott search site or the Dakota County search site as the candidate site for a new airport would place all land use planning in the selected area in limbo for up to 5 years; and WHEREAS, selecting either the Dakota-Scott site or the Dakota County site as the definite location for a replacement airport would lower the area's quality of life by adversely impacting natural areas and critical wetlands, eliminating hundreds of acres of productive farmland and the tradition and heritage of the family farm, and increasing the sprawl of urban land uses; and WHEREAS, a recently completed survey indicated that the citizens of Farmington, by a 75 percent to 17 percent margin, oppose or strongly oppose the relocation of a new regional airport in southern Dakota County; and WHEREAS, the Council acknowledges that the expansion of the existing airport would impact the City, most notably if the proposed parallel Cedar Avenue runway is constructed, but the impact would be less severe than relocation. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Farmington urges the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Minnesota Legislature to avoid the negative economic and environmental impacts that would affect the entire region if the regional airport were moved to a new replacement site, and focus instead on retaining the region's present Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, mitigating existing problems and improving and expanding the present site in order to meet anticipated needs in the 21st Century. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 3rd day of June, 1991. A ! AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. NAME: Daniel M. Siebenaler DEPARTMENT: Police DATE: May 28 , 1991 MEETING DATE: June 3 , 1991 CATEGORY: Unfinished Business SUBJECT: Traffic Survey EXPLANATION: Results of streets survey REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson City Administrator Wayne Henneke Finance Director Tom Kaldunski City Engineer \gedillWL SIGNA ^ ` ~ ' ° ' ~ MEMO TO: Mayor and Council SUBJECT: Sign Inventory DATE: May 29, 1991 The Public Works Department has completed it' s sign inventory of the City. A detailed map of those signs is available for review. After consultation between our two departments and reviewing all of the available information, we would like to make the following recommendations for Council consideration. Stop Signs - Placement On 190th Street at Flagstaff Avenue 3-way, Ely at 180th (Dakota County Estates) On Embry Ave. at 193rd (Akin Park) On Dunbar at 203rd (Pine Knoll ) On Exley at Upper 182nd (Hill Dee) On Fairgreen at Hwy 50 On 4th at Walnut On 7th at Walnut 4-way, Maple and 2nd We would recommend the following for future consideration: Stop Signs - On 183rd at Embers This would be recommended after the new addition is substantially developed. Stop Lights - The City should actively pursue stop lights at Co. Rd. 31 and Hwy 50 and at Hwy 50 and 3rd Street. In addition, with development of Elm Park we recommend a stop light at 1st and Hwy 50. Reconstruct the intersection of Upper 182nd and Lower 182nd to a T configuration with a stop sign controlling Lower 182nd Street. Truck Routes: In the past the Council has discussed truck routes. This would be a good opportunity to discuss this topic again. The question that comes to mind for discussion is: Does the City wish to establish a Truck Route System and Ordinance? The purpose of such a system would be to direct heavy loads onto street designed to carry those loads, and to plan the future upgrading of substandard streets. . '. ' � ^ Mayor and Council May 29, 1991 Page 2 It should be noted that designation of truck routes does not prohibit pick up or delivery off of those routes. At this time we would recommend the designation of all Collector Streets, MSA routes and Service Routes be included for discussion. As a part of this study it would be our recommendation to remove the No Trucks sign from Walnut Street. The original intent of this sign was the prevention of truck travel. In actuality it is unenforceable. By Statute, a truck may travel on this road for purposes of pick up or delivery. In addition, since this street was built to a 9 ton standard using MSA funds, the legality of such a restriction is questionable. Designation of this street for truck traffic would relieve 2nd Street of the heavier load for which it is not designed. Finally, we would like the Council to open discussions regarding establishment of Seasonal Parking Restrictions to aid in snow removal. Such restrictions would require adoption of a new ordinance and some additional warning signs but overall cost would be minimal. At this time, the Traffic Study is complete for Council action. If you have any comments or questions, feel free to contact either of us for additional information. Tom Kaldunski Director of Public Works - / ' \ - ` � � , Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police DMS/m MEMO TO: Mayor and Council SUBJECT: Traffic Survey DATE: May 28, 1991 Ire July of 1990, the City Council ordered an over all study of traffic problems :.r1 the city. The study was to include traffic control signs; traffic patterns and traffic speed. This memo will deal with one specific part of the study, speed. In order to determine problem areas, the pc'l ice department reviewed speeding complaints and requests for additional traffic control signs. The majority of our complaints and requests came from the Dakota County Estates area. First Street, Second Street and Seventh Street were also the sources of speeding complaints. In order to provide greater documentation of speeds in residential areas, I selected other streets in various subdivisions where similar design and traffic control are present. The following list indicates the individual streets studied. DAKOTA COUNTY ESTATES: 180th, 182nd, Emerald Trail, 183rd OLD TOWN PROPER: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 7th CHATEAU MANOR: Fairview Lane, Heritage Way WESTVIEW: West Hickory The. speed survey was conducted during daytime hours by a part- time art- time police officer i n an unmarked squad car using an MPH K-55 radar unit in the stationary mode. The officer monitored direction of travel and peak speed of each vehicle. These were' recorded in ,_,rie: hour increments. The attending officer was specifically prohibited from any enforcement action since that would have affected the outcome of the survey. The second phase of this study involved the transfer of raw data into a readable form. The attached graphs will show four separate results. Each tells the total number of vehicles per hour; the average speed of those vehicles; the total number of vehicles driving in excess of posted speed limit and the total number of vehicles driving at a ticketable speed. It should be noted that the Police Department Policy gives an allowance of six MPH in residential areas. This allows for odometer errors. Beyond six MPH over the posted limit is "ticketable. " The dotted line will serve as an ind.icat ion of 30 MPH. The total number of vehicles gives us an indication of the use of the street. This is feeder or c:ol iec:t:c_,r. The purpose of this collector street is • to move a large volume of traffic quickly. Therefore, we expect a higher volume of traffic at a higher speed. Mayor and Council May 9, 1991 Page The second category should be of interest to this study. The average speed of the traffic should not exceed 30 MPH. Even a • small range over the 30 MPH mark is an indicator of problems. The third category involves the total number of vehicles traveling in excess of posted limits. This number should be viewed as it relates to the total. The higher the percentage violation, the higher the average speed will be. This is the figure that is of particular interest in the placement of traffic control signs. Most of these vehicles can be slowed dawn by the strategic placement of signs. The final category studied is the total number of ticketable offenses. As mentioned the Farmington Police enforce residential speeds at six or more miles per hour over the limit. Non- residential speeds are enforced at 10 or more miles per hour. This category is an indication of need for traffic enforcement and/or traffic control devices. These graphs clearly show the difference between controlled and uncontrolled streets. The most vivid examples are 180th Street, which is uncontrolled and 182nd Street which is controlled. We can easily see the percentage of drivers traveling in excess of the posted limits is 4 1/2 times higher in the uncontrolled area (8% and 37%) . Based on data obtained in this traffic survey several areas of concern appear. In Dakota County Estates, 180th Street appears to need some type of traffic control device. While the number of ticketable offenses is low, the number of vehicles in excess of speed limits is high. This probably indicates a gradual increase in speed over a long stretch. This problem would best he solved by interrupting that gradual acceleration. A stop sign in the vicinity of Ely or Ellice should solve this problem. Another area of concern is First Street. This is the only street studied with a consistent average speed in excess of 30 MPH. The character of the road and low housing density promotes higher speeds. This street is designed like a collector, but is not intended to serve that purpose. The posting of traffic control signs would be beneficial, but is difficult due •to the lack of intersections. At this point, the police department has undertaken an enhanced enforcement position in this area. At this writing the enforcement action appears to have diminished but riot eliminated the problem. . - Mayor and Council May 9, 1991 Page 3 Second Street is also a residential street. While average speeds here generally remain below the posted limit, they do uncomfortably approach that limit. Here again, we see proportionately high numbers of speeders. Much like 180th Street these can be attributed to a long uncontrolled stretch of road, however, the number of ticketable offenses is relatively low. Third Street is intended to be a collector street. Average speeds here are expected to approach the posted limits, since a large volume of traffic must pass through with minimal congestion. Because of the nature of the street and it' s intended use, I would hesitate to recommend any additional traffic control devices. This problem would best be solved by a program of enhanced enforcement. In the cases of both 6th and 7th Streets, we see average speeds well below limits with relative few violations. At this time, I would recommend no changes for either of these streets. The final areas checked were Fairview Lane, Heritage Way and West Hickory Streets. The study indicates no substantial problems on either W. Hickory or Fairview. On Heritage Way we see an abnormal number of vehicles when considered in proportion to the size of the neighborhood. I feel this can be directly attributed to the Park/Pool facilities. These facilities also add increased pedestrian traffic which in turn increases the hazard of high speed traffic. While average speeds are safely below limits, when we consider other neighborhood factors, there is a fairly significant number in excess of those limits. Due to the seasonal nature of heightened activity, I feel a higher police visibility would produce the desired results. At this time, the basic residential traffic speed survey is complete. I will be conducting a follow up survey as needed and • dependent upon council action. As a result of the information obtained, I would recommend the following action. Placement of a three-way stop sign at 180th and Ely Ave. Placement of a 4-way stop at 2nd and Maple Streets. Increased traffic enforcement along 1st Street and on • Heritage Way. Finally, although it is not addressed in this study, I feel Farmington' s traffic control could be greatly improved by consistent application of existing traffic control. • - , . ' Mayor and Council May 28, 1991 Page 4 Specifically, I feel that any street intersecting a collector or large should be controlled •by a stop sign. Currently this would only change signs along Walnut Street. I believe other collectors are appropriately marked. In addition, we should avoid similar problems in new development, but I feel these can be addressed in the pre-development planning process. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. ' • . . . Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police DMS/m Attach cc: Larry Thompson Tom Kaldunski • . �dS S 10IFIIA AO ZEMIN G 1 40O CO CO O tD 8 Fr • O 8 F-r O 8 r 8 8 W., ■ ' . - g . 8 . TEIdS S2110II12A 30 =MIN I I I I I I I I 0 0 8 ./ \ 8 ell'yN • aR o g 8N..p Z 0. 8 N SID8 W. N I TIi • aaS =MIURA J0 212131(iN N �+ o Ui o U, c Vi c 1 o 0 0 8 8 gi8 K a g 8 N • i_ Il 8 a N • QEdS Sa'13IEIIA 30 ZEISICN O p C N I I I I I I t 0 o . w 8 8 c • 5 8 K � o acn a e rt .. 0 0 N 8 80101 41. • 8 • CMOS Sa'13I1IIA JO ZEMIN vi1-10 G 0 VI 0 U 0 I I I I II I 0- COso 1111 II 8 — 01 N riii 0fl o & g 0 ry .< ffDD .. — 0 0 Z .. _ 8 .. _ 8 n� 81111 — w eq. ri g 1 4 cn a. n S01 N GEMS S3'I,II A 30 2II81[]N 0 G k'' o I I l I I i 0 0 o 0 8 cn gi o • 8 0 8 Of 4114 8 , $ _ : peads SATOP-RA 3o aagwnN to ll1 O ~ O U' 0 Ui p U' C U' 0 O' J •a O CO 0 Ut 0 ll1 0 t2f v O 0 CO 0 O a U. O rt 1-1 (D a (D rt. O r•h 0 F-i O O N O O F+ . O O N 0 N7c• rt O oas ►•-• a a O a cep 1n CD a (v (tea CD a a � mPA i n i - C1212d.S =IFMA AO SIN • O O CO 8 5 ci d O r 8 r � F•+ 8 �+ I 8 O N .. _ 8 • Wa ,� CCD 8 �` N ' S7131113A L/ 110/4ut • 8 o , , d 0 0 co 8 III 8 En g 8 K � CA rt� cD 8 r' 8 N 8 C w n rt 8• _ a a1-1 alI-' ►r a is, cD . r C (D •• 8 — CD 1-• n m N N Q�IIdS �, S3'DIJ2A 3O 2EM1N I I I 1 I 0 0 CO 8 •• irJ N .cc 8 Z y C O O N O (D rt y 8 w �-+ N• n � � x � rnmm cr c� e 8 Q' _ n � CA• 8 . and • =ILEA 30 2II814TN I 1 0 o 8 8 c • K 8 6 0 0 vro CD 11 GO 8 • 8 . A •4 a. t . s V..1adS • S2'DI1 aA .10 MINIM N 0 rn 0 uNi o ‘no I I I l I I 1 o — 0 t CO 8 ko I 8 — i x m cno Inc .1x 0 n Z 0 0 Z 8 .. o -- 0 N .. \8 , 2 .3 o W 0 6 O n to A- *. cD ft M rt N N C CrAi I. ( 0. I. c�D N O a a n n (D N N .l AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. 90---r Nom: James Bell DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation DATE: May 28, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 3, 1991 CATEGORY: New Business SUBJECT: Personnel - Parks and Recreation EXPLANATION: REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Personnel Jim Bell Parks and Recreation J4bP^"ftd SIGNATURE MEMO TO: LARRY THOMPSON SUBJECT: RECREATION PROGRAMMER POSITION DATE: MAY 29, 1991 The position of Recreation Programmer was placed nathee t1991oB1 udget. Iir quest that we fill this position at this time. At liminary rating, organizational chart and a copy of the proposed adverti ement. Hiring would be on the July 15, 1991 Council agenda. Jeww•-as•J James Bell Parks and Recreation Director cc: file JB/mh MEMO TO: LARRY THOMPSON SUBJECT: RECREATIONAL PROGRAMMER RATING DATE: MAY 29, 1991 I have reviewed and evaluated the new Recreation Programmer position. The following are my opinions. Working Know How Management Problem Solving Contacts Conditions Supervision Degree D C C C+ B1 A Points 85 50 40 40 35 0 Total — 250 James Bell Parks and Recreation Director cc: file CITY OF FARMINGTON POSITION DESCRIPTION POSITION: RECREATION PROGRAMMER PURPOSE AND SCOPE: Plans, organizes and supervises recreational programs for all citizens. RELATIONSHIPS: Reports to: Parks and Recreation Director Gives Work Direction To: Part Time Recreation Workers and Instructors SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Plans, organizes and directs a wide range of recreational activities throughout the community. ‘ac,-.. ."3G Sart ioc2 C.CN sz. Pa.oat2-esn^1 '1 G. 2. Cooperates and assists in conducting special events and community wide programs. 3. Carries out the marketing and publicity of all activities including news releases and community brochures. 4. Prepares program budgets and recommends program fees in order to make activities self-supporting. 5. Contacts part time help daily with regard to use of equipment and supplies and oversees any problems. 6. Receives, issues and oversees the use of equipment and supplies for programs and recommends the acquisition of additional equipment and supplies. 7. Assists in the planning, organizing and direction of new activities for the Department. 8. In the absence of the Parks and Recreation Director, supervises the operation of the Recreation programs including part time staff, accounting for money and meeting the public. q. L14ISo-) TO "C LMt.Jc -r ` VA-L Tic k50C 411t N The above statements describe the principal functions of the job identified but shall not be construed as an exclusive listing of all the work requirements that may be inherent in the job. Minimum Qualifications Bachelors Degree in Parks and Recreation plus one year's experience in recreational programming. 45 1 .111 cn .. • t i cn •- d I XI E o p p'+ • ti > �til,. ow...... 1 H P4 1-4y '� U U44 H ..... O A _zc z .eg 43 ORIN WI ii2A4 CO a2 y A W r7 tg H N a O p c a z EEPFE-�� pUp� IN.z O a ~ 1-4 O A 1-1 1-1 rraIH 1 V a M a H . A: ia 04 0 Cil 8 — c Q H a • o ar-c,h •••-••., a 1 U ti CO U g para a....NCsa O I — y 1-1 _I A p�• y D a CCD N z a 3 y Ijimimmilmimmmmm 00 oa I I • w.-1 I. .IJ • r1 e0 Acocr. • a 0,3I aI oi 1 . tz. 03 4 AI v w " � g 4 i' a Hy c0 H1-1 1-4 W a I I 11 • 61 4.1 COcn Ha at+ R I 0 ow o ; H a d ,.1 a � wg . aa� A 1 IA I I I . 2aa y 11 4.1 60 0 �� aAe $g M El • 0 0 y 1 I 1 .1•1 .i V H 0-11 H 1 0 731 y I I 00 m A • 1.4 i4 c4 fli w,-I r1 61 1..1 aal R -� adw_ w '.1 I A -- w A A' O I I 1 N Q a - t M r 0 (1) .”1 b Z00 A' O Avim I co Ow I 1 1 1 A V tO a I I aaao H w 43 4.1 I C../ Ili o • p'' I I v . 4.1 1-1 CO a 4NN1 �.• -Nawq a • A C) w I IPCU 0 0 I I I lil cal •• �M MU d Vri 71141/3V 0V W W b idi 1 ow yE-401W7F 4-I ii E403 i py 1 1 CAa) O E u o a as 0+ I 1 Recreation Programmer City of Farmington is accepting applications for the position of Recr ation Programmer. Position is responsible for planning, organization and supervision of recreational programs. Salary range is $22,245 - $26,644 Minimum Qualifications - Bachelors Degree in Parks and Recreation plu one year's experience in recreational programming. Applications are available at City Hall, 325 Oak Street, Farmington, 55024. Applications received until July 1, 1991. Equal Opportunity Employer cc: Dakota County Tribune Farmington Independent AGENDA REQUEST FORM (2) ' ITEM NO. 0 NAME: Karen Finstuen f"\' 1 I A 4 'DEPARTMENT: Administration J} . DATE: May 28, 1991 Or MEETING DATE: June 3, 1991 CATEGORY: Miscellaneous SUBJECT: Request to Build Lunchroom EXPLANATION: Self Explanatory REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo - Karen Finstuen REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Tom Kaldunski Public Works Larry Thompson Administration a}1. SIGNATURE • MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: LUNCHROOM DATE: MAY 29, 1991 I am seeking your approval to spend the 1991 budgeted amount of $3,100 for a lunchroom. With the budget restraints that we currently have, I fe t I should ask your approval to seek bids at this time. If I am able to reque t bids, I would approach local construction people only and would attempt to stay within the budget. We need the lunchroom at this time to meet the needs of our employes along with other storage and space problems that are occurring. aren Finstuen Administrative Assistant cc: Larry Thompson file • 0) . AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. NAME: Karen Finstuen DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: May 28, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 3, 1991 CATEGORY: Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Capital Outlay Request - Building Inspections EXPLANATION: Request to purchase pickup for Building Inspections REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo/Capital Outlay Request - Karen Finstuen REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Karen Fiustueu Administration John Manke Building Inspections SIGNATURE MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: CAPITAL OUTLAY PURCHASE - TRUCK FOR BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE: MAY 31, 1991 Attached is various information regarding the above mentioned vehicle. I requested prices from Jeff Belzers Todd Chevrolet, Valley Oldsmobile, Bob Carter Ford and Farmington Ford. Farmington Ford was the only one that responded. On May 31, 1991 I obtained a telephone quote from Bob Carter Ford. Farmington Ford Bob Carter Ford 1991 Ford F150 4 X 2 Short Box Automatic Transmission Power Brakes Power Steering Air Conditioning AM/FM Radio Engine Block Heater Rear Step Rustproofing TOTAL COST $ 11,131.00 $ 11,328.00 Less Trade in 84 Ford -400.00 -400.00 Total Package $ 10,731.00 $10,928.00 (Less $500. rebate dependling on purchase date.) I recommend that we purchase the above mentioned vehicle as quoted by Farmington Ford in the amount of $10,731.00 Karen Finstuen Administrative Assistant cc: Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke Karen Finstuen John Manke file • REQUEST FORM CAPITAL OUTLAY PURCHASES DEPARTMENT moi.;.,. DATE OF REQUEST 5/30/0 ITEM(S) TO BE PURCHASED /C/2j/ g/6O AMOUNT PROVIDED IN ORIGINAL/ADJUSTED 199/ BUDGET : $ H, 000 AMOUNT REMAINING AS OF DATE OF REQUEST : $ 1/, 000 QUOTATIONS RECEIVED : 1 1 . VENDOR jAA,rv,_.,�,.-C( � DATE .51J4/Cl/ AMOUNT $ /o, 731,00 2 . VENDOR /.;;ce,,A C�(,t�(l ti � � DATE 513/n/ AMOUNT $ /D/Qa8.00 ::ATTACH QUOTATIONS, IF VERBAL QUOTES, EXPLAIN BELOW COMMENTS : --- 5/3Ok/ (U! . - AZ_ 4301 DEPARTMENT HEAD SIGNATURE DATE FINAN E DI ` CTOR SIGNATURE TO : THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL I RECOMMEND THE ABOVE REQUEST BE APPROVED. SIGNATURE OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE ACTION TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL ON THE DAY OF 19 (APPROVED) (NOT APPROVED) FILE : CC : . 1 ... .. ''`it% ARMINGTON APFORD-MERCURY 301 ELM STREET, FARMINGTON, MN 55024 (612)463-7191 • Fax#463-7755 PICK UP SPECIFICATIONS FARMINGTON BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT ATTN: KAREN FINSTUEN MAY 30, 1991 (BID) (F15) 1991 FORD F150 4X2 SHORT BOX $10,220.00 498A SPECIAL 585.00 FRGT (99Y) 5 SPD MANUAL TRANS 120.00 TIRES P215/75R 15SL STD PWR BRAKES PWR STEERING (41H) ENGINE BLOCK HEATER 33.00 LOW MOUNT MIRRORS - SWING AWAY INC AM FM RADIO W/CLK INC (76C) REAR STEP PAINTED 130.00 SUBTOTAL $11,088.00 RUSTPROOF 269.00 TOTAL MSRP 11,357.00 FARMINGTON FORD BID 9,539.00 ALTERNATE BIDS AUTO TRANS MSRP $12,281.00 BID 10,325.00 MANUAL TRANS AIR COND. MSRP + 806.00 BID 806.00 TRADE OF 84 FORD F150 - 400.00 1731 00 Pick Up Specifications for Building Inspection Department Half Ton 4x2 Short Box Pickup Engine - 4.9 Six Cylinder Transmission - 5 Speed Manual Overdrive * Tires - P215/75R 15SL Power Brakes Power Steering Heavy Duty Battery Tinted Glass Engine Block Heater Low Mount Swing Away Mirrors AM-FM Radio Rear Step Bumper Rustproofing Blue or Silver Metallic in Color * Alternate Bid - Automatic Transmission Alternate Bid - Air Conditioning Alternate Bid - With Trade in of 1984 Ford Please forward quote to: Karen Finstuen Administrative Assistant 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Business No.: 463-7111 Fax No.: 463-2591 %if? RCP ROYAL CONCRETE PRODUCTS .6640 INDUSTRY AVE•RAMSEY,MN 55303•(612)421-8491•FAX(612)422-1517 7 "Where the Customer is Always King" ' 5 ev p e e 1 �� p Ss" 4 , • Post-It"brand No.of Pages l Today's Date 121 ck 1 Time I I• 45 Fax Transmittal Memo 7672 �--J( To \'fir\ •\�\R.g From 'Ka Vers f t' ✓1c-like1 - Company f \\� Company L Location Location 3 ,...S Oat Dept.Charge Fax# Telephone# Fax# y. Telephone# Comments Original Lj Destroy ❑Return ❑Call for pickup Disposition: Vec42 ";-orLA)64.• a, (1%,1/46e-' uY1 o t c JZknr`cit.) ecocc. �1�• 4- SGS. FPost-it'"brand Mme+ ax Transmittal,Memo 7672 No.of Pages 1 Today's Date bia3 Time /!:g To { ^ y From -- Company �l L�. ( 1 f 1r' Company 2✓\. /C" ✓ZSt�Lkikt.1 1cJW7ier � cY\Z 7r cA- iN\4► k'0 Location Il'Go -C — Location -7J�S OA, Dept.Charge Fax# Li(_�lJG �• 1 t/`C49 Telephone# ,_ Fax# 40-6_ asq 4 Telephone# L46}5 Comments l Original LI Destroy El Return El Call for pickup Disposition: (....?\ e C .`� ori 60a-vd. e c tides. p n -4At-- G �-e� *Lc►cv �e.a �cr� w gip`- `�' `t .h.k- I.0 ck.