HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.07.91 Council Packet AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
OCTOBER 7, 1991
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVE AGENDA
3. APPROVE MINUTES
a. September 16th - Regular
b. September 24th - Special
c. September 30th - Special
4. CITIZENS COMMENTS
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. 7:30 P.M. - Review Youth Recreation Facility Ordinance
6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Consider ALF 5 Year Plan
b. Waiver of Platting Ordinance - River Valley Clinic
7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
a. Resolution Authorizing Issuance of $905,000 G.O. Bonds
b. Resolution Declaring Costs/Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll - Project 91-10
c. Resolution Declaring Costs/Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll - Project 91-1
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Closing of Jensen/Donnelly Pit
b. Equipment Purchase - Backhoe
c. Equipment Purchase - Tractor and Flail Mower
d. Policy for Accepting Privately Owned Improvements
e. Final Payment - Automated Solid Waste Truck
f. MSA/FAU Funding Update
g. Update Resource Recovery Facility
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Request to Bid Fire Truck
b. Approve Agreement with Knutson Recycling
10. MISCELLANEOUS
a. 1992 Landfill Abatement Funding Application
b. Administrator's Annual Evaluation
11. CONSENT AGENDA
a. August 1991 Budget Adjustment
b. Compliance with Reimbursement Bond Regulations
c. Capital Outlay Request - Parks
d. School/Conference Request - Parks
e. Capital Outlay Request - Fire
f. Capital Outlay Request - Liquor
g. Final Payment - Project 91-8 - Seal Coating
h. Partial Payment - Project 91-11 - Sidewalk Maintenance
i. Street Lights - Terra 2nd Addition
j. Change Order - Project 91-1 - Spruce Street
k. School/Conference Request - Engineering
1. School/Conference Request - Administration
m. Agreement with Tom Quam
n. Capital Outlay Request - Fire
o. School/Conference Request - Fire
p. Equipment Purchase - Solid Waste
q. Approve Amendment to VRWMC Joint Powers Agreement
r. Driveway Apron at 312 5th Street
s. Adopt Ordinance Amending Reforestation Ordinance
t. Adopt Resolution Approving Application for Gambling Premise Permit
u. Approve Payment of the Bills
12. ADJOURN
1.
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. 50,-.
NAME: Dan Siebenaler
DEPARTMENT: Police
DATE: October 1, 1991
MEETING DATE: October 7, 1991
CATEGORY: Public Hearings
SUBJECT: 7:30 P.M. - Review Youth Recreation Facility Ordinance
EXPLANATION: Self explanatory
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Ordinance - Dan Siebenaler
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Dan Siebenaler Police
SIGNATURE
t ;
3-23-1 3-23-2
CHAPTER 23
YOUTW. RECREAT%ON FACILITY ( 6\1.. //
0
SECTION:
3-23-' 1 : Purpose
3-23- 2: Definitions
3-23- 3: License Required
3-23- 4: Application
3-23- 5: Execution of Application
3-23- 6: Fees
3-23- 7: Persons Ineligible for a License
3-23- 8: Exemptions
3-23- 9: Grant of Licenses
3-23-10: License not Transferable
3-23-11 : Conditions of License
3-23-12: Suspension
3-23-13: Revocation
3-23-14: Appeal
3-23-15: Duration of License
3-23-16: Regulations
3-23-17: Youth Recreation Facility Distinguished
3-23-18: Health and Disease Control
3-23-19: Construction and Maintenance Requirements
3-23-20: Inspection
3-23-21 : Identification of Employees
3-23-22: Violations
3-23-23: Hours
3-23-24: Enforcement
3-23-1 : PURPOSE: An Ordinance regulating, protection and
promoting the public health, safety and general welfare
of the people of the City of Farmington by regulating the
operation and licensing of Youth Recreation Facilities.
3-23-2: DEFINITIONS: As used in this Ordinance, the terms
defined in the subsections shall have the following
meanings ascribed to them:
(A) "Employee" an individual working for the licensee for
financial compensation.
(BY ' "Gaming devices" mean pin ball machines, bowling machinesv
foosball machines, pool tables, or any other type of gaming
device which is operated by coins, chips, or tokens of any
kind, or which device is rented to the public.
(C) "Person" means an individual, copartnership, an association,
a corporation, or other entity or organization.
(D) "License" includes permits of every kindv nature and
description issued pursuant to any statute or ordinance for
the carrying on of any business, trade, vocation, commercial
enterprise or undertaking.
= .
3-23-2
3-23-3
•
(E) "Licensee" means any person to whom a license is issued.
(F) "Licensed business" means any businessv trade, vocation,
bommercial enterprise, or undertaking for which a license
is issued.
(6) "Licensed premises" means the place or building or the room
in a building, designated in the license as the place where
the licensed business is to be carried on, and all land
adjacent thereto and used in connection with and in the
operation of a licensed business and all adjacent and
contiguous rooms or buildings used in connection with the
buildings where the licensed business is carried on.
(H) "Operate" means to manage, run or control a business.
( I ) Youth Recreation Facility means an enterprise, whose
primary focus is to provide recreational activity for
minors.
3-23-3: LICENSE REQUIRED: No person in the City of Farmington
shall engage in the business of operating an enterprise
defined in Section 3-23-2, either exclusively or in connection
with any other business enterprise, without first obtaining a
license issued by the City. A person engaged in the business of
operating a enterprise on the date this Ordinance becomes
effective shall apply for a license within sixty (60) days of the
effective date of. this Ordinance.
(A) A person commits an offense if the person operates an enter-
prise described in Section 3-23-2 without a valid license
issued by the City.
(B) An application for a license must be made or a form provided
by the City Clerk. The application must be accompanied by a
sketch or diagram showing the configuration of the premises,
including a statement of total floor space occupied by the
business. The sketch or diagram need not be professionally
prepared but must be drawn to a designated scale or drawn
with accurate dimensions of the interior of the premises.
(C) The applicant must be qualified according to the provisions
of this Chapter and the premises may be inspected at any
time without warrant to assure compliance with the law by
the appropriate City personnel or its authorized repre- '
sentatives and agents.
3-23-3 3-23-6
•
(D) If a person who wishes to operate an enterprise as described
in Section 3-23-2 is an individual, the individual must sign
the application for a license as applicant. If an applicant
is other than an individual, each individual who has a ten
percent ( 10%) or greater interest in the business must sign
the application for a license as applicant. Each applicant
must be qualified under Section 3-23-4 and each applicant
shall be considered a licensee if a license is granted.
(E) Any falsification of the application shall result in denial
or revocation of a license.
3-23-4: APPLICATION: Every application for a license under this
Ordinance shall be filed with the City Clerk. Each
application shall be made on a form supplied by the City.
3-23-5: EXECUTION OF APPLICATION: All applications for license
shall be signed and sworn to. If the application is
that of a natural person, it shall be signed and sworn to by such
person; if by a corporation, by an officer thereof; if by a
partnership, by all of the partners; and if by an unincorporated
associationv by the manager or managing officer thereof.
3-23-6: FEES:
<A> License Fees: Each application shall be accompanied by
payment in full of the required license fee. The City
Council shall, by resolution, establish the amount of the
business license fee. Upon rejection of any application for
a license, the City shall refund the amount paid. No other
refunds shall be made.
(B) Investigation Fees: At the time of each original application
for a business license, there shall be paid in full an
investigation fee. At the time of each r4enewal application
for a business license there shall be paid in full an
investigation fee. The City Council shall, by resolution,
establish the amount of the original investigation fee and
, the renewal investigation fee. No investigation fee shall
be refunded. (Ord. 090-229, 2-5-90)
(C) License: Duration: All licenses shall be in effect from
January 1 through December 31, except those fees for
licenses issued during a calendar year shall be prorated '
from the date .of issuance until December 31. (Ord. 090-238,
10-1-90)
3-23-7 3"23-7
•
3-23-7: PERSONS INELIGIBLE FOR A LICENSE: The City Council
deny issuance of a license if one or more the following
true:
(A) An applicant is under eighteen (18) years of age.
(B) An applicant is overdue in his payment to the City of taxes,
fees, fines or penalties assessed him or imposed upon him.
(C) An applicant has failed to provide information reasonably
necessary for issuance of the license or has falsely
answered a question or request for information on the
application form.
(D) An applicant has been convicted of a violation of a pro-
vision of this Chapter, other than the offense of operating
an enterprise described in Section 3-23-2 without a license
or a related State law, within two (2) years immediately
preceding the application.
(E) The premises to be used for the enterprise has not been
approved by the appropriate the City personnel as being in
compliance with applicable laws and ordinances.
(F) The license fee required by this Chapter has not been paid.
(G) An applicant has been employed in an enterprise in Section
3-23-2 in a managerial capacity wi.thin the preceding twelve
( 12) months and has demonstrated that he is unable to
operate or manage the premises in a peaceful and law abiding
manner, thus necessitating action by law = t
officers. •
- [\ ` *
(H) An applicant l~as-be convicted xually oriented crime5xy
w (Minnesota Statutes 609. 293 through ~
609. 352 and 609. 685) ; sale or furnishing of tobacco to
minors (Minnesota Statutes 609. 685, Subd. ( 1 ) (a) and (2) ;
procuring alcohol for persons under 21 (Minnesota Statutes
340A. 503) ; any controlled substance crime contained in
Minnesota Statutes 152 or Contributing to Delinquency of
a Minor Minnesota Statutes 260. 315.
( I) The fact that a conviction is being appealed shall have no
effect on the disqualification of the applicant.
•
(J) The applicant or person in his employ are not complying with
or have a history of violations of the laws and ordinances
that apply to health, safety or moral turpitude.
•
3-23-8 3-23-10
3-23-8: EXCEMPTIONS: Daycare facilities as defined by
Minnesota Statute 245. 782 Subd. 5-6 and operating
under (MN Statute 245. 802) rules established by the Commissioner
of Human Services shall be exempted from provisions of this
sectitin.
3-23-9: GRANT OF LICENSES:
(A) All applications shall be referred to the City Clerk for
verification and investigation of the facts set forth in
the application. The Chief of Police and other consultants
shall make a written recommendation to the City Council as
to issuance or non-issuance of the license. The City
Council may order and conduct such additional investigation
as it deems necessary.
(B) Upon receipt of the written report and recommendation by
the Chief ofPolice, the City Clerk shall publish in the
official newspaper notice of a hearing to be held by the
City Council. The notice shall be published at least ten
( 10) days in advance of the hearing, and it shall set forth
the day, time and place when the hearing will be held ; the
name of the applicant, the premises where the business is to
be conducted ; the nature of the business; and such infor-
mation as the Council may direct. A license, other than a
renewal, shall not be approved by the City Council prior to
such hearing.
(C) Renewal Applications. No less than ten ( 10) days nor more
than fifteen ( 15) days after the date for submitting
renewal applications, the City Council shall hold a public
hearing. Notice of the time and place of such hearing and
the fact that a renewal application shall be considered
shall be published in the official newspaper ten ( 10) days
in advance of the hearing. Opportunity shall be given to
any person to be heard for or against the granting of a
renewal license by the City Council. (Ord. 090-229, 2-5-90)
(D) Change of Location: A license shall not change location
without first submitting a new application pursuant to this
' Chapter and obtaining approval by the City Council. If the
proposed location meets zoning requirements, . the Council may
approve the application. If the proposed location does not
meet zoning requirements, the applicant shall first obtain
zoning approval before being considered by the Council. A
public hearing is not required for approval of a change of
location pursuant to this Chapter. (Ord. 091-243, 2-19-91 )
3-23-10: LICENSE NOT TRANSFERABLE: Each license shall be' issued
to the applicant only and shall not be transferable to
another holder. No licensee shall loan, sell, give or assign a
license to another person.
3-23-11 3-23-13
3-23-11 : CONDITIONS OF LICENSE: A business requiring a license
under provision of this ordinance shall maintain a
ratio of at least one adult employee working on the licensed
premises for each thirty (30) patrons on the licensed premises.
3-23-12: SUSPENSION: The City Administrator shall suspend a
license for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days if
the City Administrator determines that a license of an employee
of a licensee has:
(A) Violated any provision of this Chapter.
(B) Engaged in use of alcoholic beverage, tobacco or use of a
controlled substance while on licensed premises.
(C) Refused to allow an inspection of the licensed premises as
authorized by this Chapter.
(D) Demonstrated inability to operate or manage the enterprise
in a peaceful and law abiding manner thus necessitating
action by law enfOrcement officers.
3-23-13: REVOCATION:
(A) The City Council may revoke a license if a cause of
suspension in Section 3-23-11 occurs and the license has
been suspended within the preceding twelve ( 12) months.
(B) The City Council shall revoke a license if it is determined
that :
1. A licensee gave false or misleading information in the
material submitted during the application process.
2. A licensee or an employee has knowingly allowed
possession, use or sale of alcohol or controlled substance
at the licensed premises.
3. A licensee or an employee knowingly operated the
enterprise during a period of time when the licensee' s
license was suspended.
. '
4. A licensee has been convicted of an offense listed in
Section 3-23-4.
5. A licensee is delinquent in payment to the City for '
ad valorem taxes, local lodging tax, or other taxes or
fees related to the enterprise.
(C) The fact that a conviction is being appealed shall have no
effect on the revocation of the license.
3-23-14 3723-16
3-23-14: APPEAL: •
(A) If the City Council or designee denies the issuance of a
license, or suspends or revokes a license, the City
Administrator 'shall send to the applicant or licensee, by
certified mail, return receipt requested, written notice of
the action and the right to an appeal. The aggrieved party
may appeal the decision of the City Council or designee in
writing within ten ( 10) days of receiving notice of the
City' s action. The filing fee of an appeal does not stay
the action of the City Council or designee in suspending
' or revoking a license.
(B) Procedure: Upon receipt of a written appeal, the City
Council may appoint a committee of the Council or an
independent hearing officer to hear the matter, report
• findings of fact and a recommendation for disposition
to the Council. Upon receipt of recommendation for
disposition, the Council shall conduct a public hearing
which shall be preceded by ten ( 10) day written notice
to the licensee stating the time and place of the hearing
and the nature of the hearing. Hearings on the appeal
shall be open to the public and the licensee or applicant
shall have the right to appear and be represented by legal
counsel and to offer evidence in its behalf. At the
conclusion of the hearing, the City Council shall make a
• final decision.
(C) Additional Requirements: The City Council may base denial,
suspension, revocation or non-renewal of a license upon any
additional grounds which they may, in their sole disoretionv
impose.
3-23-15: DURATION OF LICENSE:
(A) All licenses issued pursuant to this Ordinance . shall be
effective for a period not to exceed one year. All licenses
shall expire on December 31 of each year.
(B) Application for renewal shall be made at least sixty (60)
days prior to the expiration date.
3-23-16: REGULATIONS:
(A) Such establishments shall provide adequate refuse
receptacles which shall be emptied as required. •
(B) Possession of any alcoholic beverage or narcotic drugs or
controlled substances on the premises by licensee, employee,
or patron shall be prohibited.
3-23-16 ` 3-23-20
(C) The licensed premises shall not admit any patrons nor shall
any patrons be permitted on the premises between the hours
of ten o' clock ( 10:00) PM and seven o' clock (7:00) AM.
(D) No persons under eighteen ( 18) years of age may be employed •
in an establishment requiring a license under the provisions
of this Chapter for purposes of management or supervision
of patrons as defined in Section 3-23-10.
(E) The applicant shall furnish the City with a list of current
employees, indicating their names and date of birth and
designating the duties of the employees within the licensed
premises. The licensee shall promptly notify the City of
any additions to or deletions from the list of employees
or changes in their job description or duties.
(F) The licensed premises and its contents must be kept and
maintained in a sanitary condition.
(0) Premises shall comply with all health, safety, and building
regulations of the City of Farmington.
(H) Youth Recreation Facilities shall not be detrimental to the
health, welfare or safety of the citizens of the City of
Farmington. •
( I ) No one shall be employed by the Youth Recreation Facility
who has been convicted of any offense contained in 3-23-7 (H)
within the past five (5) years.
3-23-17: YOUTH RECREATION FACILITY DISTINGUISHED. A private
enterprise, the primary focus of which is to provide
recreational activity for minors. This distinction does not
preclude the use of said facilities by adultsv either privately
or in conjunction with minor patrons.
3-23-18: HEALTH AND DISEASE CONTROL: No person while afflicted
with any disease in a communicable form or while a
carrier of such disease, or while afflicted with boils, infected
wounds, sores or any acute respiratory infection may work in or
use the services of any licensed premises. No persons known or
susp6cted of being afflicted with any such disease or condition
shall be employed or permitted in such area or capacity.
3-23-19: CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS: Must meet
minimum requirements of the Minnesota State Building *Code.
3-23-20: INSPECTION: Each operation required to be licensed
hereunder shall at all times be held open for
inspection by any duty authorized law enforcement officer, health
officer or building inspector to insure compliance with all pro-
visions of this Ordinance.
3_23_21 3~23_24
3-23-21 : IDENTIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES: Upon demand by any police
officer, any person engaged in providing services in
any licensed premises shall identify himselfv giving his true
legal ' name, date of birth and correct address.
3-23-22: VIOLATIONS: Every person who commits or attempts to
commit, conspires to commit or aids or abets in the
commission of any act constituting a violation of this Ordinance,
whether individually or in connection with one or more other
persons or as a principal agent or accessory, shall be guilty of
such offense, and every person who falsely, fraudulent1yv
forcibly or willfully induces, causes, coerces, requires, permits
or directs another ,to violate any of the provisions of this
Ordinance is likewise guilty of such offense.
3-23-23: HOURS: No customers or patrons shall be allowed to
enter or re-enter the licensed premises after ten o' clock ( 10:00)
PM and before seven o' clock (7:00) AM daily.
3-23-24: ENFORCEMENT:
(A) Any person violating a provision of this Chapter, upon
conviction, is punishable by the maximum levels allowed
by State law for the commision of a misdemeanor.
(BY Injunction: A person who operates or causes to be operated
a business without a valid license or otherwise in
violation of this Chapter is subject to a suit for
injunction as well as prosecution for criminal violations.
(Ord. 090-229, 2-5-90)
•
•
.
'
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. t
II
NAME: Larry Thompson I i ® 1_ "))",
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: September 16, 1991
MEETING DATE: October 7, 1991 Agi1
CATEGORY: Petitions, Requests and Communications '`
SUBJECT: Consider ALF 5 Year Plan
EXPLANATION: Per request of the ALF Board
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Plan - Larry Thompson
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Ken Kuchera Fire
Dan Siebenaler Police
SI TORE
.
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: ALF 5 YEAR PLAN
DATE: OCTOBER 3, 1991
Attached please find a copy of the 5 year ALF Plan for your review and comment.
The only items I feel should be addressed are the proposed increase in subsidy
for 1993 and the increase to (2) 24 hour units in 1993.
While I feel the two 24 hour units is a goal of the City, it should be considered
in the context of demand, or if the City could be best served by one 24 hour
unit and two 16 hour units.
I have discussed this matter with Councilmember Orr and he indicated that this
will be looked into.
o/a' lljf:n76":"--------,,.
Lar Thompson
City Administrator
cc: Ken Kuchera
Dan Siebenaler
file
WAME; ULANCE
14200 Cedar Avenue South
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
Phone — 612-432-5664
TO: ALF Ambulance Joint Powers Board
FROM: Kevin J. Raun, Ambulance Director
DATE: August 9, 1991
SUBJECT: ALF AMBULANCE FIVE-YEAR PLAN
Attached hereto is a revised and updated draft of the Ambulance Five-Year Plan
covering years 1993 - 1997. This draft document is for review and discussion by
the Executive Board.
The charge of this plan is to help organize and project future major equipment
purchases and staffing needs. This plan also looks at projected budgets and
revenues for the five-year period. By knowing what to expect and anticipate, it
will allow for the appropriate and continuous delivery of emergency medical
services to our member communities. This strategic planning becomes an important
element to our program in helping to ensure fiscal responsibility while
maintaining an appropriate service level.
The following is a general overview of the plan. I will explain the various
sections of the plan and cite the rationale used in the construction of this
draft document:
BIOGRAPHY
1993 will mark the beginning of eight years of service to our communities. This
section takes the reader through those years to see the various growth and
changes ALF has experienced.
A. Proposed Capital Equipment Purchases
This section identifies the future equipment needs of the service. Items are
identified under the year in which their purchase is projected to occur. Each
item is assigned a number, short description of the capital asset, purchase year,
and budgeted cost.
To obtain the cost of a particular item, various vendors are contacted to quote
current market prices. The item is then given an estimated inflation value for
the year in which it is intended to be purchased by examining past market trends.
It should be noted that durable medical equipment has a higher inflation index
than does general durable products. This is probably of no surprise to anyone.
ALF AMBULANCE FIVE-YEAR PIAN
August 9, 1991
Page 2 _
FIXED ASSET REPLACEMENT RATIONALE
This section identifies by number the correlating fixed asset and gives a brief
description and/or need for the item's projected purchase.
B. Proposed Staffing
This section identifies future staffing needs of the ambulance service. As the
Executive Board is aware, we have relied on subjective data collection to plot
our future growth trends. This, coupled to our member cities own projections for
demographic changes, has helped to ensure we are meeting the service needs of our
citizens. Board policy is also a major factor in determining our staffing needs.
Historically, the Board has always insured appropriate staffing and training
levels with regard to personnel coverage.
C. Proposed Budgets
This section attempts to predict our future budgetary needs for the coming years.
The ambulance service deals with a significant annual budget. In 1995, the
budget will exceed one million dollars annually.
This section divides out the major areas of our operating budget to identify the
expenses associated to each.
Budget projections were arrived at by using the 1992 approved budget and using
a straight four percent inflation index. In those years when staffing and/or
equipment additions where to occur they were calculated in at their projected
values for that given year.
The Board is cautioned that while we would strive for only four percent inflation
added to any expansion of services, this has not always been the case. Costs
associated with personnel have had a tendency to rise the sharpest out of any of
the major expense areas.
D. Proposed Revenues and Subsidies
This section shows future population forecasts and our anticipated revenues which
are derived from several sources. The largest revenue base is user fees.
Population forecasts are done using the 1990 Federal Census as our base,
Metropolitan Council estimates for current years, and finally city data
pertaining to past and projected issuance of building permits. Service area �.
townships are not included in these numbers. In 1997, it is estimated that the
static population of the ambulance service area (including three townships) will
be 100,000 people.
Total transports are based on past experience which allows for 2.3 patient
transports per 100 of population. This figure coupled to projected average
revenue per call allows us to forecast anticipated user fees for a given year.
Other anticipated revenues are factored in. Taking the projected budget amount
ALF AMBULANCE FIVE-YEAR PLAN
August 9, 1991
Page 3
from section "C" and subtracting the projected revenue amount from section "D"
is the amount forecasted to be city subsidy.
The good news! Based on the projected facts and figures contained within the
Five-Year Plan, the ambulance service will not require any city subsidies
starting in 1996. User fees and other billable revenues are projected to support
the operations of the ambulance service.
The goal of zero subsidy is consistent with Executive Board policy and direction.
The ambulance service has been operated as an "enterprise fund" and, in 1996, it
should be able to reach true enterprise status.
SUMMARY OF FIVE-YEAR PLAN
This page is designed as a condensed synopsis of the entire plan.
At the Board's direction, this draft document may be reviewed for comment by
staff and Council from the member cities. Once all interested parties have had
an opportunity to comment on the plan, all needed changes can be made and a final
plan completed for Board review and ratification.
Please feel free to call me with an questions or comments you may have.
KR:pjg
Attachment
ei r
A.L.F. AMBULANCE
FIVE-YEAR PLAN
1993 - 1997
G�
J0
A.L.F. AMBULANCE
FIVE-YEAR PLAN
1993 - 1997
•
A.L.F. AMBULANCE
FIVE-YEAR EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL PLAN
PREFACE
This document has been prepared for the ALF Ambulance Board to assist
them in the planning process for the future growth of the ALF Ambulance Ser-
vice. It is well known that the Cities that comprise the ambulance service
area are growing at a very rapid pace- and it appears that residential and
commercial growth will not be slowing for some time. Met council estimates
currently place the entire ambulance service area population at just over
85,000.
This plan will outline proposed major equipment purchases, staffing needs,
projected operating budgets and revenues for the five-year period covering 1993-
1997. All budget computations have been calculated as accurate as possible, but
the reader should be cautioned that these amounts are extremely vulnerable to
inflation and other market factors.
ALF Ambulance is currently in a growth phase and this plan allows for an
orderly growth as well as replacement needs for aging equipment. The goal over
this five-year period is to ensure that the service is able to respond on demand
to normal call loads as well as maintaining our vehicles and capital equipment
in a reasonable manner to the demands and needs of our service.
The Operations Board is committed to providing quality emergency medical
services for the residents of our area and in that endeavor it may be necessary
to review and update this plan on an annual or as needed basis.
BIOGRAPHY
1986
January: ALF Ambulance begins operations with (6) full-time paramedics and
(1) Ambulance Director. ALF Ambulance maintains (2) fully-
equipped licensed advanced life support ambulances. One unit
operational 24 hours a day.
June: (4) Part-time paramedics hired to cover vacation and sick time
leave. Additionally utilized as on-call paramedics.
October: (5) additional part-time paramedics hired. Staff of (9) part-
timers utilized to staff second ambulance for a power shift.
Second unit is operated four days a week, 8 hours a day.
1987
January: Service area coverage and staffing remains at same level as that
of October 1986. One full-time paramedic promoted to Ambulance
Supervisor/Paramedic.
1988
January: (5) additional part-time paramedics hired. Staff of (14) part-
timers utilized to staff second ambulance for a power shift.
Second unit is operated seven days a week, 8-hour days on
weekdays and 10-hour days on weekends. One more full-time
paramedic hired to cover full-time leave and power shifts.
August: A third fully equipped ambulance is purchased.
1989
January: (4) additional full-time paramedics hired. One ambulance
operated 24 hours a day with a second ambulance operated 16 hours
a day (0700 - 2300 hrs), seven days a week. Staff of (6) part-
time paramedics for on-call status to cover vacation and sick
time leave.
•
1990
January: Service area coverage and staffing remains at same level as that
of 1989. One full-time paramedic promoted to Ambulance
Supervisor/Paramedic for a total of two shift supervisors.
February: One paramedic is placed in the position of Community Education/-
Promotions. Responsibility includes coordinating and conducting
first aid and CPR training for citizens and allied first
responder personnel. This position also covers open shifts due
to leave requests and/or training needs of other personnel.
1991
January: Service area coverage and staffing remains at same level as that
of 1990. One full-time paramedic promoted to Ambulance
Supervisor/Paramedic for a total of three shift supervisors.
April: Community Education/Promotions position deleted following
resignation of a full-time paramedic.
July: One casual on-call paramedic hired to cover vacation/sick time
leave. This brings our part-time roster to 8 paramedics.
•
•
FIVE-YEAR PLAN
A. PROPOSED CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASES
.[TEM PURCHASE YEAR COST
1. (1) EKG Monitor/Defibrillator 1993 $ 9,650.00
2. CPR Manikins 1993 1,000.00
3. Miscellaneous Office Furniture 1993 500.00
4. (1) Backboard 1993 350.00
5. (3) Pulse Oximeters 1993 4,500.00
6. (2) Portable Suction Units 1993 1,500.00
7. (1) Battery Support System 1993 1.800.00
TOTAL 1993 $ 19,300.00
8. Repower/Refurbish Medic #10 1994 $ 18,900.00
9. (2) Portable Radios 1994 3,000.00
10. (2) Pagers 1994 800.00
11. (1) M.A.S.T. Suit 1994 600.00
TOTAL 1994 $ 23.300.00
12. Type III Ambulance 1995 $ 82,000.00
13. Mobile Radio/Telephone 1995 6,500.00
14. Defibrillator/Monitor 1995 10,600.00
15. Misc. Equipment for New Ambulance 1995 7.000.00
TOTAL 1995 $ 106,100.00
16. Rechassis/Remount Medic #11 1996 $ 48,000.00
17. (2) Portable Radios 1996 3,400.00
18. (2) Backboards 1996 750.00
19. CPR Manikins 1996 1,150.00
20. Miscellaneous Office Furniture 1996 750.00
TOTAL 1996 $ 54,050.00
21. (2) Portable Oxygen Units 1997 $ 1,000.00
22. (1) Battery Support System 1997 2,250.00
23. (1) EKG Monitor/Defibrillator 1997 13,150.00
24. (2) Pagers 1997 900.00
25. (1) Portable Suction Unit 1997 850.00
26. (1) M.A.S.T. Suit 1997 700.00
TOTAL 1997 $ 18,850.00
MIXED ASSET REPLACEMENT RATIONAL
1993
Item
1. Replacement of EKG Monitor/Defibrillator with upgrade to Life Pak 10. This
will enable us to use cardiac transcutaneous pacing on patients with life
threatening cardiac rhythms. One of our oldest Monitor/Defibrillators will
be redesignated as a spare unit for backup in the event of mechanical
failure for one of our primary units.
2. Our CPR Manikins have served us well since 1986 in classes for our allied
first responders and the public. However, due to their frequent use, they
are showing their wear. (1) Adult and (1) infant manikin are required to
continue quality education programs.
3. In 1991, a built-in computer work station was installed in the center
office. There is now an obvious need for wall cabinets in this office to
store our computer accessories and miscellaneous office supplies.
4. This is to replace a backboard initially put into service in January, 1986.
Service length was anticipated at seven years.
S. We are looking to incorporate pulse oximetry into our patient care
services. This is a technology that is being increasingly used in pre-
hospital care. Use of this equipment will allow us to monitor the
respiratory status of our patients and correct problems before they become
life threatening.
6. Our portable suction units will be seven years old this year. This is a
very critical piece of equipment necessary to clear the airway on patients.
7. This item is a carryover from 1992. With the addition of our second 24-
hour unit, it will be necessary to have a charger for our EKG
Monitor/Defibrillator batteries in one of the southern stations. Also,
there has been a demonstrated need for a spare charger due to the age of
our current battery charging system to ensure properly charged batteries.
1994
Item
8. Repower/Refurbishment of an ambulance is estimated to be done at 100,000
miles. It is possible that more or less miles may be obtained before a
unit is ready for refurbishment. Refurbishment is contingent upon the
overall chassis condition of the unit. If a chassis is found to be in poor
repair/condition, it may be more prudent to opt for a new chassis remount.
A refurbished vehicle should be able to obtain an additional 80,000 to
100,000 miles of use.
9. Our portable radios have an estimated life expectancy of seven years. By
purchasing (2) new portable radios at this time, we will assure ourselves
of having viable radios at all times. Older radios will still be used in
back-up roles.
10. Our pagers are used on a daily basis. Therefore, they do experience wear
and tear associated with that use. Due to the age and use of these pagers,
it is prudent to replace pagers periodically.
11. One of our M.A.S.T. suits was initially put in to service on 1/1/86. At
that time we expected to receive four years of service from each M.A.S.T.
suit. Although we have gotten more service from this piece of equipment,
it does receive hard use on critical patients and is due for replacement.
1995
Item
12. The purchase of a new ambulance and necessary equipment has been included
in this plan to allow for anticipated growth and expansion of the service.
In 1995, we are predicting that a third ambulance will be placed in to
service on a power shift basis (partial coverage during peak call load
.hours). This is subject to change as call volume and population growth in
the service area will be the final determining factor on this purchase.
13. A mobile radio/telephone will be needed to equip the new ambulance which is
anticipated this year.
14. A Monitor/Defibrillator will be needed to equip the new ambulance.
15. This includes items such as long and short backboards, splints, M.A.S.T.
suits, suction units, Nitronox, and other equipment required to fully stock
the new unit.
1996
Item
16. Re-chassis/remount of an ambulance includes the remounting of the patient
module onto a new vehicle chassis. The patient module can either be
totally or partially stripped depending on refurbishment needs of the
module at the time. This procedure generally has a price tag slightly
higher than half the cost of a new ambulance. This unit will be eleven
years old at the scheduling of this re-chassis.
17. Our portable radios are an important part of our ability to communicate
with dispatch. Initially, these radios were expected to be in use for
seven years. This ensures continuous replacement and upgrade of our radio
equipment.
18. This is to replace a backboard initially put into service in January, 1986.
Service length was anticipated at seven years.
19. This will replace two of our CPR manikins purchased in 1986, purchasing (1)
Adult and (1) Infant manikin will be necessary to continue quality
education programs for the public and our allied first responder agencies.
20. This is to replace office furniture/equipment that receives daily use in
our offices.
1997
Item
21. This is to replace the original equipment, initially expected to be in
service four years.
22. By 1997, our original battery support system will have been in service
eleven years. This is a critical piece of equipment to insure proper
operations of our EKG Monitor/Defibrillators.
23. This is to replace and upgrade one of our original Monitors to a Life Pak
'g8, which will allow us to provide cardiac transcutaneous pacing to our
patients.
24. This is the continued replacement program for our older radio pagers.
Pagers are used to alert crews of incoming emergency calls.
25. This is a replacement unit for an aging suction unit which will have nine
years of use at replacement time.
26. This is a replacement M.A.S.T. suit to replace a service start-up original.
B. PROPOSED STAFFING
XEM STAFFING LS'VEL
1993 (1) Ambulance Director/Paramedic
(3) Ambulance Supervisors/Paramedics
(9) Full-Time Paramedics (24 Hours)
(8) Part-Time/On-Call Paramedics
Increase the second unit to a full 24-hour day (two 24-hour units).
This has been a subject matter of much debate. Our data collection
will be our true barometer as to when to upgrade the hours of
operation for the second unit. This plan allows for that upgrade if
indicated in 1993. Consideration for the staffing of a third unit on
a power shift basis will also be looked at.
FSR STAFFING LEVEL
1994 (1) Ambulance Director/Paramedic
(3) Ambulance Supervisors/Paramedics
(9) Full-Time Paramedics (24 Hours)
(8) Part-Time/On-Call Paramedics
Continue to maintain staff and hours of operation at the 1993 level.
Examine hours and needs for staffing the third unit on a power shift
basis.
YEAR STAFFING LEVEL
1995 (1) Ambulance Director/Paramedic
(3) Ambulance Supervisors/Paramedics
(9) Full-Time Paramedics (24 Hours)
(10) Part-Time/On-Call Paramedics
Maintain two 24-hour units and staff the third unit as a power shift
with part-time personnel working 8-hour days, 3 days a week.
YEAR STAFFING LEVEL
1996 (1) Ambulance Director/Paramedic
(3) Ambulance Supervisors/Paramedics
(9) Full-Time Paramedics (24 Hours)
(10) Part-Time/On-Call Paramedics
Maintain two 24-hour units and staff the third unit as a power shift
with part-time personnel working 8-hour days, 5 days a week.
•
YEA STAFFING LEVEL
•
1997 (1) Ambulance Director/Paramedic
(3) Ambulance Supervisors/Paramedics
(9) Full-Time Paramedics (24 Hours)
(10) Part-Time/On-Call Paramedics
Maintain two 24-hour units and staff the third unit as a power shift
with part-time personnel working 8-hour days, 7 days a week.
Investigate if viable, varied work shifts that would allow for
staffing of all three units with full-time personnel.
•
FILE-ALF\5YEAR
4 0 O. 0% 0 eV CO 0 O N
N
o 1 w 4 .°-+ aCO 00 0 14
eh CO r•+ en O Co a1 O
0
r-1•10 r4 r4 r4 r4 0 r4
+14 4.4
0. v). v} to W CO
r-1 r4 in '0 0 0 en n 0 O Cel
CO CO N 0 0 In In a1 $4 eh
m Os in a) 0 00 in 0 0 CO
M ... •• +11.6 • . . . 44
� in till 0
In C ') IInn ee 1 CO inn CO
in r-1 .-1 r-1 0 0 0
0
4.4 i 1+ 4.4
v). al. v} t?W er>
v
—S $
in .--i N %0 0 0% 01 0 0 0%
4 r-I N COm CT ON 0
00 '0 Inn r-4 CC) '0
in 0
Os is- m AA el ttl tO WI
C\ %0 4 N 4 r.4 O W r•1
.--1 In r-1 r-1 v.4 0 .-a 11) O
O
r-1 )4 .-d
e v> v> v}W01.
.-. ...
O
4 1-4 +.0 r4 M CO 0 11 M
4 CO %0 1ss .0 N In 0 '0
0% N 0. 0 0 r♦ M W ..I
0% 4 In N In %O N V)
r{ In r-1 r-1 r-1 0% 0 0%
O
11
(I> e/> (1> 0)-a
v
4 00 0 4 0 u1r... O 0
O Vi
CO 44 N 4 "0 4 0 14 i0
in in O I 4-4 4--1 e+1 0 r-I
01 - - eq
0% r-1 N %0 00 0 0% W 0
-d in 4-1 4-1 r-1 r-1 N
4-4
0
14
0> 0> <I> V1•W 0>
v v
co
Cl) J-) 0)
0 coW 00
0 0 1+ 43
"^' d 0) 0) N
CO
0 '\ a
A
C)
w
Cl) aI -.'1 )4 'v4 C) Q 43
' 0
O
a w 0 0 U 4i 40 14 W to0
o � � 0) 0m CO 0) .4 0
a 1+ w ai ra 11 40 .a f-1 4) 8-1
0 0 14 0 0 11 44 .-4 d
•U vi 00 Cl. 0 H 0 0 Z 0 EO-i
In 4 COC9 O 0 0 01 a0 0 0000 0
NI r♦ r l tel
0% CI: e+1 N '.0 0 u1 0 r♦
.-� u7 c+1 O+ u1 1,. u1 N u1 O
�7 e+1 0'ul Ch 00 CV. 0 •
N r. ,••1 rr l in
r4 r4
CD- ri r/
01. e4. N> t? a!
+n .7el Cl O 00 01 O rl 0000 O
N i-I r4 O 0 4 ri 4 u1 0 0 10►
N40 N- • e O u1 4NNu1 a1
0
en r, 00 00 e N N CA CI 4 ri
.'f 01 00 4 ri ri N
0 0
1-4 r4
N p> (0. 0> 00•
in 4 CO C4 r1 er1VDC1 co 0% N CO 000 00
N r1 M u1 N n r 0 C+ 4 C► 0 0 0 0 0
1, InMO N- • N4sit N- Ch 4 010rien 41
r4un4 cel 0034 00 P. ri 1..1 in r-11 1-.1 A
0% C►
0,• 44- 0? N t/> Oar
•
4In401 N u1 C1 C1 In rl 00 0% N000 N
1� ri r1 0 ND N- CO u1 N u1 VD O u1 O u1 O
NNe•1 CO • rtu11. u1 CO 4 4NON 4
O 01 V. O '.0 r4 4 N r1 r1 CO 1t1 4 0%
4 In 00 N N u1 1%. 1-1 1-1 0
00 0%
v> V> V> e/> V> 03.
u1 may' N O 0N. '.D en co N. ti000O 4O
In t`• rl u1 N In In u1 N %0 4 0% 000 0
Cti N '4 co enMCO N n 4 N1.1100 N
0%
I In is. 4 el 0% 0% CO r-4 r4 N
N CO
Cl)14
`
M
CO. (0- (1> (1> t? tn.
A
H
CAcal
CA
A
r1
ri
CO 0 bO
a) •
a1 rf
r1
Cc, 134 v4
14 1-1?1 CO O III N
14
14 0 U N Ea! 7 0 O W,
CO rt r. 01 ,-a 0 G N •-1 CO 0 pct
O rt 0 O 4.1 ,-1 01 O 0 Oa ,-1 0 >
cd 4.1
O E-1 > r-1 14 a > r1 14 E-+ 0 CA .,.1 rea
1
C4 1 •r1 a cd •r., 0 0 CO 4 ,--i10
a a) > •.-i a o a) > •11 a 1-1 r, 0 rt en 0 1-1 a
,-1 a) E 4 r1 0 E d > a1 11 a § U a) E
a a.4 1a E-4 $4 a x 1a H 1.1 01 :31 y ,1 Er
HH0Haa •ax. N 0. cd
0
c 1-1 ca ,-a E-1 E . 2C 1-1
1• 10 O 0 N 0 wow .4 W 001 0 ('O N O
40 10 N 0. 01 10 0.00. N 04 0 • O
W 0 r1 0 w 10 e•1 0 0 0 01 0. C ,4 O O
O w VI ...pp4 ♦ OI.0.4 0.0♦ O w
ON1 - w w Opt O .O•I.NO neo .1 .1
40 0 0 40 b 40 .4 .4 i4.4 40 b .q b
1 4a
a y a a a s
01
41.4i ii it . SI
LH a
ffiJa1,11 u
a lb II lb i1
1 eNn aoow .ONp o .6 aoa000l• 00p„o p•1 0 0
NpNIry00o IN11i^O ONi npO ..4410ry/04 ANN 01 ON O
lV�OUI d0 N.44N .4 _ NwMI .�1 .1w0I .O
4/4 e4
....
.4 .1 a h O .4 VD
w .4 a .4.4 0
0.4 O .1 44 .4 411
.•1
Q 40 40 40 40 40 400 4) M 40 b
• A
~ a wy a
QM
i i 41 N
a *.4 a
4114 a a Ua
4014 . S .1
~
• •
.4.4 nA . 4oA .4.4V0A .i.4UE +i.4 .. •
0.4 40E
4aC aQE .4i440 AA
.4..4 ..4 .II .4 .4 .4 .i14 .1 .1 .4 .4
oat4X4OO Zm Ua- x0Q04X4
0we4X14
1
1 as•
pr CA el 04
eo .04 Oto Cr
00 el
No .4 WI o 0
11 U M a 4n ma o .„1
M .r 02. .i .4
VP
114
.4 .0 w a a U •
04 v f.. .4 e '{ Jd
0 0
a 3 a 3 4 a 3
a 14isIs
.14 0 E O H M
A
e0 li VI q W w .4. .f -4.a orf 0..4.� A
M 0V. •i1 W ▪ > sa N 3O 0
• 0 • • In Y 44 N • W 44
04 .1 CO N .1 4.7 .1 .1 a 4 .1
U • • M ? A
41 AO 4? d N ?VI N ~
w .I
AN M0 c 0 0a Ua
il
M .4 M .IM Ol 0 0
• M
• 7 M M
N • ? q • .1 •0 i 0 .-1 •4 T 4.1.. .i >W T OO O 0 O O N O OM QC O C7 W U 4 Cr U 4 W U M NA
W
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 CO 0 CO 0 O 0 0 Co O O Co
4100 010000 00000 000 0 00 di ml 4h 420000 h
A O M 1.1 N 41 IO 1h 042 CO .1 004400 .4 O d /. .•1 O 4244 .4w CD O
04.4 0 .4 .104 10 46 1.1 04AON.0 0101 .4 d .INwf CO
I-4 .4 N CO e4 0 d h .4 .1
.4
i? V) M t? OO N OD M 0 0 W
MM !+1 d •• 441 .0 e4 P
ri .A.i Y r.. .. .. .04.1 .. .044 4.0 .• Y .044 .4 a
W M O V V 41 +1 a M 0 W O
.4 • ? . M 40 v .
.000 ? MA .
O 0 .
m7 a °
- SoA .ua • W N ccO ,,
- fl . • y .. s H
.-
0 •• ? .0 N . 0 .4 .-1 0 0 •1 b •• ? N it .4
. NWMY 0Y .4 ? YOCNYMNW 4 .4 0 .1
0 .40 . AEO 0 .4N0 - .-00
•4Y0 AM OA4W 4A0 •1 • .0M04A4
.1404440 . MMM ] < 0A • .
A 4 A .1L U .1 d • X M $ 4
-.. ..4.14 0 0 N 44J Y E < -1 -1 U < U 0 A4 -4 .+ A N a++ Y N E <
04440 -4140E 4414400E ) U'44 4 E I M U 0 W E -11 0 0 r M 41 E
01X0000° 0E 040104X11 Z 140XE 0 04 ( XOE NOWW NME
c
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO.
NAME: Charles Tooker
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: September 17, 1991
MEETING DATE: October 7, 1991
CATEGORY: Petitions, Requests and Communications
SUBJECT: Waiver of Platting Ordinance - River Valley Clinic
EXPLANATION: For purposes of financing, River Valley Clinic must be
on a separate parcel of land from the hospital, even though the hospital
will still own it. The Planning Commission will be acting on a variance
request to allow a zero lot setback for both on October 8th.
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Letter to Marty Stapleton - Charles Tooker
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Karen Finstuen Administration
Charles Tooker Administration - Planning
kt457 // ,
SIGNATURE Arril67
pE
4 September 18, 1991
Re: River Valley Clinic at Farmington, Minnesota
Gentlemen,
The need for separate ownership of the parcel on which River Valley Clinic
in Farmington will be built became known to me yesterday late in the day. The
Farmington City Code requires that both the City Council and Planning Commission
need to take action before such a split can take place.
The City Council must act on a "lot split" while the Planning Commission will
review a variance request for zero lot line setbacks between the Hospital and
the Clinic. The next regular meeting of the City Council is October 7th and
the Planning Commission will meet on the following evening, October 8th. Because
the Planning Commission has already acted favorably on the Conditional Use
for this relationship between South Suburban Medical Center and River Valley
Clinic, I see no problem that would stand in the way of either request.
If you need any more information from the City of Farmington, please do not
hesitate to give me a call.
Sincerely,
•4- 41Alk, WIL%'
•
Charles Tooker
Planner
cc: file
City Fa mitgfox 325 Oak Street • Ftvimixgtex. KUf 55024 • (612) 463-7111
v
St Warm
WW Pe*
w __•
rJ
11/4
41e
afirr
`�1 September 18, 1991
Marty Stapleton
2400 American National Bank Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
Re: River Valley Clinic, Farmington, MN
Dear Mr. Stapleton,
Following a telephone call from Dick Nordlund yesterday, I have investigated
the City Code for the requirements that must be fulfilled in order for the
River Valley Clinic building, now under construction, to be situated on a parcel
separate from the South Suburban Medical Center. Because the property lies
within the urban service area for Farmington, a waiver of platting request
must be submitted to the City Council.
The City Council next meets on October 7th and I have requested that this item
be placed on the agenda. Although I am mailing you the request, the form actually
must be completed by the property owner. The fee for processing this application
is $65.00. Supplementary information includes both a survey and a site plan,
which the land surveyor can reduce and copy from existing materials.
Because the properties are non-residential uses which will have zero lot line
setbacks within the R-1 Low Density District, the Planning Commission will
need to hold a public hearing to grant a variance from requirements of the
City Code. I have scheduled a public hearing for the Planning Commission on
October 8th at 7:00 P.M.. We can use the list of property owners within 350
feet that was developed for the Conditional Use Request for our mailed notice
and you can include the survey and site plan developed for the waiver of platting
request. The fee for this variance hearing is $50.00. I would hope that you
can have all the material needed for both meetings to me by the 24th of September.
I plan to enclose a letter to the lender for this project indicating that I
foresee no problems in securing the necessary approvals since the Conditional
Use has already been granted.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call.
atr47
cc: file
Charles Tooker, Planner Dick Nordlund
CTT
FWLIII UgtU 325 Oak Street • Favauagiat. in 55024 • (612) 463-7111
•
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO.
MA
, , r ()ITEM
D
NAME: Tom Kaldunski
r r ,
DEPARTMENT: Public Works C/
DATE: September 24, 1991
MEETING DATE: October 7, 1991 01.0 Vir
/
CATEGORY: Unfinished Business
M gr
SUBJECT: Public Works Equipment Purchase - Backhoe
EXPLANATION: The City has received bids for the purchase of the
tractor backhoe. The tabulation of bids will be
presented with a recommendation.
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Bid Tabs/Recommendation - Tom Kaldunski
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Wayne Henneke Finance
Tom Kaldunski Public Works
Jerry Bauer Public Works
SIGMA
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: EQUIPMENT PURCHASE - BACKHOE LOADER
DATE: OCTOBER 4, 1991
On September 25th the City received bids on the purchase of a backhoe loader.
The bid tabs are attached. The following outlines the bids received with all
alternates included.
Case Power and Equipment $38,387
Lano Equipment 39,615
Midwest Machinery 41,730
Carlson Tractor 50,230
Upon review of the contract documents of the low bid, it is my opinion that
Case's proposed equipment package does not meet the City's specifications. Case
noted 17 exceptions to the City's specifications. The following outlines the
significant deviations.
1. HP 70 vs Minimum 72HP specified (should have bid a larger unit)
2. Torque proportioning differential vs. limited slip differential. (The
specifications specifically excluded torque proportioning because it is
not as effective as limited slip. The City determined that they wanted
more power in the front wheel drive based on demonstrations before preparing
the specifications. The limited slip can provide up to 50% more power
to the wheel with good footing.)
3. Did not meet wet sleeve cylinder liner design specification. .
4. 1 cubic yard bucket vs. minimum 1} cubic yard bucket specified.
- 9000 lb breakout force vs. minimum 9300 lb specified.
- 5500 lb lift rating vs. minimum 5600 lb specified.
- Smaller tires than minimum specified.
- 15,100 lb. operating weight vs. minimum 15,500 lb specified.
- 10,760 lb digging force vs. minimum 11,500 lb specified.
- 65 amp electrical system vs. 78 amp electrical system specified.
(The items in #4 generally indicate that the Case bid is based on a small unit
than the minimum specified by the City. It appears that a larger machine could
have been bid by Case, but they attempted to secure the low bid by bidding a
smaller unit than desired by the City.)
5. Extended warranty bid by Case does not meet the specifications. They bid
a lesser extended warranty.
In reviewing the bid documents of the second lowest bidder, it is my opinion
that the equipment package proposed by Lano equipment also doesn't meet the
City's specifications. Lano noted 14 exceptions to the specifications. The
following outlines the significant deviations.
1. 80 hp engine vs. minimum 72 hp specified (This deviation would be an advantage
to the City over the other tractors bid.
2. Torque proportioning differential vs. limited slip (See item #2 on Case bid.)
3. Outboard planetary gear drive vs. inbound planetary gear drive specified.
4. 33.6 gpm capacity on hydraulic system vs. minimum 35 gpm specified. (Not
enough capacity.)
5. 65 amp electrical system vs. minimum 78 amp specified.
It should be noted that this unit will provide higher breakout force and lift rating
because of the larger engine provided. I would recommend this JCB Backhoe before
the Case backhoe because of the extra power provided for a low cost (bid differential
of $1,228.00) , however, the issue on the differential is a significant one.
The improved 4 wheel drive as specified is desired by the City crew.
In reviewing thebid documents of the 3rd lowest bidder, Midwest Machinery,
it is my opinion that they meet all the City's specifications. In order for
the City to have a 4 wheel drive system that is desired, it would cost an additional
$2,115.00 over the JCB unit. When you consider that this unit will be used
by the City for approximately 20 years, this cost is relatively insignificant.
The John Deere unit is preferred by the Public Works Department and I would
recommend that the Council award the bid to Midwest Machinery in the amount
of their bid of $41,730.00. The Department's second choice would be the JCB
backhoe, however, the 4 wheel drive would not provide the power that the John
Deere unit can.
Thomas J. Kaldunski
Public Works Director
cc: file
Wayne Henneke
Jerry Bauer
TJK
TJK/mh
` TABULATION OF 3 BIDS RECEIVED
il '
INDUSTRIAL WHEEL BACKHOE LOADER
72 HP - 14'6" DIG DEPTH - EXTENDED BOOM
BID DATE: September 25, 1991 I hereby certify that this is an exact
BID TIME: 2:00 P.M. C.D.S.T. reprod ction of the bass received.
Thomas . Kaldunsk
Public Works Director
,
BIDDERS: CASE POWER & EQUIP. LANO EQUIPMENT MIDWEST MACHINER'
\ MAKE AND MODEL: Case 580 Super K JCB Sitemaster _ .hn Deere 3 ! '
\ UNIT PRICE: $39,907.00 $43,490.00 $44,350.00
TRADE IN: (Deduct) 4,500.00 8,000.00 A 5,250.00
PURCHASE PRICE: 35,407.00 35,490.00 39,100.00
OPTIONAL AIR: (Add) 1,500.00 3,000.00 905.00
EXTENDED WARRANTY: (Add) 1,480.00 .4007---
1,125.0: 4/ 1,72 se
TOTAL: $38,387.00 $39,615.00 $41,730.00
DELIVERY DATE: 30-65 days ARO Immediately . 11- says ARO
BID BOND: 5% Certified Check 5%
BIDDER: CASE POWER & EQUIP. LANO EQUIPMENT MIDWEST MACHINERY
BY: Richard Allshouse Gerhard Lano Rudy Gmitro
TITLE: General Manager President Marketing Manager
ADDRESS: 6340 Hwy 101 3021 W. 133rd St. 12500 DuPont Ave. So.
Shakopee, MN 55379 Shakopee, MN 55379 Burnsville, MN 55337
PHONE: 612-445-5488 612-323-1720 612-890-8880
li
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
(1,
ITEM NO.
NAME: Tom Kaldunski /
—Cr)!
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DATE: September 24, 1991
Tom- s IP• fir.._-
MEETING DATE: October 7, 1991 Q„-
CATEGORY: Unfinished Business
SUBJECT: Public Works Equipment Purchase - Tractor Flail Mower
EXPLANATION: The City has received bids for the purchase of a tractor
flail mower. The tabulation of bids and a recommendation
will be presented.
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Recommendation/Bid Tabs - Tom Kaldunski
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Wayne Henneke Finance
Tom Kaldunski Public Works
Jerry Bauer Public Works
i 01
SfGGNA JJ
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: EQUIPMENT PURCHASE - TRACTOR AND FLAIL MOWER
DATE: OCTOBER 3, 1991
On September 25th the City received bids for the purchase of the tractor flail mower.
A bid tab of the three lowest bids received is attached. The following outlines
the bids received:
Firm Bid Price (Inc. Alt.)
Carlson Tractor 36,100.00
Scharber and Sons 36,680.00
Midwest Machinery 38,300.00
Long Lake Ford 41,877.00
In reviewing the bid documents, it is apparent that the equipment proposed by Carlson
Tractor does not substantially meet all of the City's specifications. The low
bidder noted 12 exceptions to the City's specifications. The significant deviations
are as follows:
1. 55 hp vs. specified 62 hp,
2. Operating weight of 5549 vs. specified 6000 lbs,
3. 3 cylinder diesel engine with cast block vs. specified 4 cylinder with wet
sleeve cylinder liner,
4. the low bidder does not meet the minimum capacity specified for the hydraulic
system.
These significant deviations indicate that the tractor proposed by Carlson is smaller
than the unit desired by the City. This would result in a lower standard of performance.
Therefore, it is my recommendation that the City reject the low bid submitted by
Carlson Tractor.
A review of the bid documents for the 2nd lowest bidder, Scharber and Sons, indicates
that no exceptions were noted. In fact, this bidder is providing a tractor that
is one size larger than specified. Added benefits for the City include:
1. 65 hp engine vs. 62 hp specified,
2. 7441 lb operating weight vs. 6000 lb specified,
3. factory installed cab with lowest decibel rating available,
4. a "Tigre" brand mower vs. Mott brand which gives a larger mower (both side
and rear, and heavy drive shaft.
It is in the City's best interest to award the contract to Scharber and Sons for
a John Deere 2555 Tractor with Tigre Mowers and all alternates in the amount of
their bid of $36,680.00. I would also like to point out that the 3rd lowest bidder
met all the specifications with the slightly smaller John Deere 2355 tractor. The
difference between the low bid and the 2nd low bid is $580.00. When you consider
the significant deviations in the low bid and the low cost to purchase the larger
tractor bid that the City will utilize for 20+ years, it is in the City's best
interest to award the contract to Scharber and Sons. I hereby recommend the Council
award this contract as outlined in this memo.
cc: file
4rreira4dunsklii Wayne Henneke
Publorks Director Jerry Bauer
M
k
TABULATION OF 3 BIDS RECEIVED `+
I.
INDUSTRIAL CLASS WHEEL TRACTOR WITH SIDE AND REAR MOUNTED FLAIL MOWER
BID DATE: September 25, 1991 I hereby certify that this tabulation
BID TIME: 2: 15 P.M. C.D.S.T. is an exact repr uction of bids
received. / /
Thomas J. aldunski
Public Works Director
BIDDERS: CARLSON TRACTOR SCHARBER & SONS MIDWEST MACHINERY
MAKE AND MODEL: Ford 4630 Tractor John Deere 2555 John Deere 2355
Alamo Mower Tigre Mower Alamo Mower
UNIT PRICE: $33,950.00 $37,155.00 $37,840.00
OPTIONAL AIR: (Add) 2,150.00 (Deduct) 475.00 (Add) 460.00
TOTAL: $36,100.00 $36,680.00 $38,300.00
DELIVERY DATE: 30-90 days ARO 90-145 days 120-160 days ARO
BID BOND: 5% 5% 5%
ADDENDUM NO. 1: Yes Yes Yes
BIDDER: CARLSON TRACTOR SCHARBER & SONS MIDWEST MACHINERY
BY: Rich Carlson Butch Valek Rudy Gmitro
TITLE: Vice President Sales Manager Marketing Manager
ADDRESS: Box 69 13725 Main Street 12500 DuPont Ave. So.
Rosemount, MN 55068 Rogers, MN 55374 Bulle, MN 55337
TELEPHONE: 612-423-2222 612-428-4107 612-890-8880
, + AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. e
NAME: Tom Kaldunski
DEPARTMENT: Public Works 0)L-/
DATE: September 13, 1991
MEETING DATE: October 7, 1991
CATEGORY: Unfinished Business
SUBJECT: Equipment Purchase
EXPLANATION: The Public Works Department has received its second
automated solid waste collection vehicle. I have
prepared a pay estimate for the vehicle.
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Pay Estimate - Tom Kaldunski
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Wayne Henneke Finance
Tom Kaldunski Public Works
1:4ii4
SI TURE
I
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: FINAL PAYMENT - AUTOMATED SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE
DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1991
The City of Farmington received its second automated solid waste collection
vehicle on September 11, 1991. It will be at the October 7th meeting for viewing
before the meeting. I have inspected it and it substantially meets all of the
City's specifications. This vehicle has been purchased from MacQueen Equipment
on the basis of their bid of $106,243.00. The City Council awarded the contract
to MacQueen Equipment on April 1st. The order was officially received on
April 8th. Their bid proposal indicates a delivery date of "Approximately 120
days ARO" (After Receipt of Order).
On the basis of this, the anticipated delivery date was August 7th. The City's
contract allows for the collection of liquidated damages of $100 per calendar
day (Attachment 1). The City can claim a maximum of liquidated damages based
on the following:
Actual - 155 days from order to delivery
Proposed - 120 days
35 days
x 100/day
$ 3500 - maximum liquidated damages.
Because of the City's past relationships with MacQueen Equipment, it is my recommen-
dation that the. City consider other liquidated damages options. This continued
good relationship has been mentioned by the Solid Waste Foreman and Solid Waste
Coordinator as well. (Attachment 2).
Option I
Assess maximum liquidated damages allowed by the contract of $3,500.
Option II
MacQueen's bid indicated a delivery date of "Approximately" 120 days after receipt
of order. Typically, City contracts refer to a 10% ± leeway. If this is assumed
to be approximate, the delivery date could range from 108 to 132 days. The
other bidder, Boyum Equipment, proposed delivery in 135 to 165 days. The liquidated
damages under Option II would be:
155 days - 132 days = 23 days x $100/day = $2,300.00.
Option III
This assumes that the City would request actual liquidated damages. In(oder---)
to estimate actual damages, I have attached my memo dated August 27, 1991 (Attach-
ment 3) in which I requested a budget adjustment of $1,400 to extend the part
time Solid Waste position. The Council could request liquidated damages of
$1,720. The estimated actual damages could be revised if the Council takes
into consideration that this part time solid waste operator has taken a job
with Knutson and has left the City's employ. In order to complete the transition
to the automated commercial collection, I had the entire solid waste staff and
some street and utility crew members transfer the 1} cubic yard dumpster to
the old waste water treatment plant site and distribute the 300 gallon containers.
On this basis, damages would be as follows:
Wage for Part Time Solid Waste Employee $1,080
Overtime by Solid Waste and Street Crew 1,370.
$2,450
Option IV
Assess no damages because of good relationships in the past, desire to continue
this relationship in the future. It should be noted that the City experienced
some problems n the maintenance and repair of the rapid rail automated truck
when these services were provided by Boyum Equipment Company. This prompted
the Public Works Department to secure the services of MacQueen Equipment for
the rapid rail truck and to utilize their services in setting up the second
automated vehicle designed for commercial collections.
The City Council will have to choose which option will be utilized for assessing
the liquidated damages for the late deliver. It is my recommendation that the
City request the actual damages outlined under Option III. The City Attorney
should present his opinions on the various options.
Once the decision has been made, the Council should authorize the final payment
on this vehicle. The City will receive the vehicle's certificate of origin
upon making the final payment. The liquidated damages are to be split equally
between MacQueen Equipment and Mack Truck. In addition, the City is to write
two checks (1 to MacQueen and 1 to Mack) . The following outlines the check
amounts for the various options:
Original Bid - $106,243.00
Liquidated Damages/Check Amount
Option I Option II Option III _:Option IV
Liq. Damages - 3,500 - 2,300 -1,400 -2,450 -0
MacQueen -1750/40,205 -1150/41,405 -700/41,855 -1225/41,330 -0/42,555
Mack -1750/61,938 -1150/62,538 -700/62,988 -1225/62,463 -0/63,688
Final Cost 102,743 103,943 104,843 103,793 106,243
I would also request Council authorization to place the attached advertisement for
bids for the sale of the 1} cy dumpsters. (Attachment 4)
10;70,046K4 .omas Kaldunski
Public Works Director
cc: file
Wayne Henneke
Ben Klotz
Bob Williamson
TJK
TJK/mh
Attachment I
Fuel Tanks: - L.H. 50 gallon capacity
Air Brakes: - AD4 Bendix air dryer with heater mounted in the frame rail
R.H. Frame Rail: - Must have 110" clearance from back of cab usable
L.H. Frame Rail: - Must have 70" clearance from back of cab usable
Electrical: - Back up alarm - mounted on rear crossmember
- Body power cable - cable routed to rear crossmember area
(Provides a source of body lighting requirements without
over loading standard light circuit)
- Electrical connections waterproof sprayed with glyptol
- Transistorized signal flasher
- Easy access to electrical maintenance parts
Paint: - Cab white
- Frame black
PTO: - Side mounted clearance right side to include exhaust clearance
Wheels: - Cast spoke 22.5 x 8.25 inch rims front and rear
Tire: - Tubeless radials 138R20 18 ply front Goodyear Unisteel G159 or equal
- 11R22.5 14 Ply rear Goodyear Unisteel G124 Traction or equal
- Mounted spare front tire and mounted spare rear tire must be
provided.
Corrosive
Protection: - Cab to be warranted for 5 years 100%
Manuals: - 2 copies of operator's manual and 2 copies of complete shop
service manual.
Operation and
Maintenance
Training: - The supplier shall provide 2 copies of a Operation and Maintenance
Manual for the vehicle and related equipment. The supplier shall
also provide a factory trained representative to come to the City
to train the City crews on the basic operation and maintenance of
the unit.
Delivery Date: The supplier shall provide a guaranteed delivery date on the
proposal in the space provided. The delivery date shall be a
factor in determining the bid that is the City's best interest.
The City has the option of choosing the best combination of
delivery date and/or bid price in making the award of the contract.
If the supplier fails to meet his specified delivery date, the
City will be compensated through liquidated damages. The
liquidated damages shall be $100.00 per calendar day.
Service: Designation of a service representative acceptable to the City
which has adequate facilities and personnel located within sixty
(60) miles of the City of Farmington and which has personnel
capable of performing all repairs and maintenance to the unit bid.
• Attachment II
•
MEMO TO: TOM KALDUNSKI
SUBJECT: DELINQUENCY CHARGES FOR LATE DELIVERY OF WAYNE PACKER TRUCK
DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 1991
It is my understanding that consideration is being given to the recovery of damages
from MacQueen Equipment Company for the late delivery of the Wayne Packer Truck.
Because of MacQueen's past record of excellent service provided to the City, especially
the crucial service of the Rapid Rail packer truck, I strongly recommend that
no charges be levied.
•-�}- 4
Q CLZ.c-1 ,�I,/
LGC�C-6�I yU. '1i3
Robert Williamson
Solid Waste Coordinator
cc: Larry Thompson
Wayne Henneke
file
RFW/mh
Attachment III
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS PERSONNEL
DATE: AUGUST 27, 1991
I am writing this memo to request a budget adjustment to extend a part time
job in the Public Works Department Solid Waste operation. The current part
time Solid Waste budget will be expended on September 6th without this adjustment.
The adjustment would extend the part time position through Saturday, October 12th
which is the Fall Clean Up Day.
There are two major reasons for the request:
Conversion of Commercial Collection to Automated System
The Public Works Department originally expected delivery of the second automated
collection vehicle on August 1st as per the equipment manufacturer's bid. This
delivery has been delayed to approximately September 15th by the manufacturer.
I have directed the City Attorney to review the contract to see if liquidated
damages can be claimed by the City.
The part time position was intended to assist with solid waste collections until
the City made the conversion to automated commercial collections, help with
the distribution of the 300 gallon containers and salvaging of the 1} cubic
yard dumpsters. The six week delay in delivery has a significant effect on
the Department.
Fall Clean Up Day
Due to the huge success of the City's Spring Clean Up Day, the Department has
a need for this position during this event on October 12th.
In order to extend the position from September 6th until October 12th, an additional
215 hours need to be funded. Based upon the wage of $8.00 per hour, the Department
needs a $1,720.00 budget adjustment. Wayne Henneke has indicated that the adjustment
can be funded through the Solid Waste 1991 Budget surplus.
I hereby request Council authorization to extend this part time position through
October 12th by approving this budget adjustment.
° ;1;f•40
/ ii: c'
Tho j J. laldunski
Public Works Director
cc: file
Larry Thompson
Wayne Henneke
Ben Klotz
Don Kippley
TJK
TJK/mh
Attachment IV
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
Sealed bids will be received by the City of Farmington, Minnesota, in the City
Hall at 325 Oak Street until 2:00 P.M. on Wednesday, October 23, 1991 at which
time they will be publicly opened and read aloud for the sale of City property
as described below:
90 each - 1} cubic yard solid waste dumpsters for
rear load packer truck
Proposals should be sent to the office of the City Clerk, 325 Oak Street, Farmington,
Minnesota, 55024.
Each bid shall be accompanied by a bidder's bond naming the City of Farmington
as obligee, certified check payable to the Clerk of the City of Farmington or
a cash deposit equal to at least five percent (5%) of the amount of the bid, which
shall be forfeited to the City in the event that the bidder fails to enter into
a contract.
The City Council reserves the right to retain the deposits of the three highest
bidders for a period not to exceed 30 days after the date and time set for the
opening of the bids. No bids may be withdrawn for a period of 30 days after the
date and time set for the opening of bids.
The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive irregularities
and informalities therein, and further reserves the right to award the contract
to the best interest of the City.
Thom J. aldunski
Publ c Works Director
TJK/mh
PAYMENT VOUCHER
DATE October 4, 1991 VOUCHER NO. 1 (Final)
CONTRACT NO, DESCRIPTION Automated Solid Waste Collection Vehicle
CONTRACTORS NAME MacQueen Equipment
CONTRACTORS ADDRESS 595 Aldine Street
St. Paul, MN 55104
AMOUNT OF CONTRACT 106,243.00
INCREASES TO CONTRACT .00
TOTAL OF CONTRACT 106,243.00
PERCENT OF CONTRACT COMPLETED 100%
TOTAL VALVE OF WORK COMPLETED 103,793.00
RETAINED ( A) PERCENTAGE .00
TOTAL PREVIOUS PAYMENTS .00
NET PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER 103,793.00 * See attached memo.
I HEREBY RECOMMEND PAYMENT OF THE ABOVE NET AMOUNT
PLACE VOUCHER STAMP HERE .- 4/1/4-1-74- '
/
INVOICE NAME)
VOUCHER
P. O. NO. City Engineer
REC'D BY : (TITLE)
PRICE 0.K. s October 4, 1991
ACCT. NO. : (DATE)October
DATE)
POSTED BY; STARTING DATE:
PAW BY TOTAL TIME ALLOWED*
.1 TOTAL TIME USED TO DATE
DATE PERCENT OF TIME USED
t CH. NO.
.-. *If not in work days, project to compl .
date.
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL THIS DAY OF
, 19 .
CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR
DISTRIBUTION :
CONTRACTOR
AUTH. OFFICER
CONTRACT FILE
•
.
INSPECTION FORM
•
DATE October 4, 1991
•
PROJECT NO. CONTRACT NO.
•
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Automated Solid Waste Collection Vehicle
I HAVE THIS DATE INSPECTED THE WORK PERFORMED ABOVE BY
•
MacQueen Equipment and Mack Truck
PRIME CONTRACTOR.
IN MY OPINION HE HAS SUBSTANTIALLY FULLFILLED THE TERMS OF HIS CONT-
RACT AS TO APPARENT WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS AND I RECOMMEND THAT A
CERTIFICATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE CON-
TRACTOR FOR HIS EXECUTION .
I FURTHER RECOMMEND THAT UPON RECEIPT OF SUCH CERTIFICATE A FINAL
PAYMENT BE MADE TO THE CONTRACTOR.
/./4;lerie..4.-/e/ (NAME)
City Engineer (TITLE)
October 4, 1991
(DATE)
•
MOTION BY SECOND BY
THAT ABOVE RECOMMENDATION IS HEREBY APPROVED. MOTION CARRIES THIS
DAY OF , 19
•
CC: Engr or Proj Mgr
Contract File
Ins. Co. CLERK
A,
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
•
ITEM NO.
NAME: Ken Kuchera � ��` (`)/ C,
DEPARTMENT: Fire Com"`
DATE: September 30, 1991
MEETING DATE: October 7, 1991
CATEGORY: New Business
SUBJECT: Capital Outlay Request
EXPLANATION: Requesting approval to bid the new budgeted grass unit chassis
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Specification/Memo - Ken Kuchera
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Wayne Henneke Finance
Ken Kuchera Fire
L C/
SIGNATURE
MEMO TO: WAYNE HENNEKE
SUBJECT: 4X4 GRASS UNIT CHASSIS
DATE: OCTOBER 1, 1991
The 1991 Fire Department capital outlay budget allowed $25,000.00 for the purchase
of a 4x4 grass unit with slide in skid unit. The skid unit was purchased recently
from Smeal Fire Equipment at a cost of $6,842.00. The remaining $18,158.00 will,
hopefully, satisfy the cost of the attached specified chassis.
The City is required to bid any vehicle which costs over $15,000.00. Preliminary
prices researched indicate the cost of this unit will be over $15,000.00. I
am requesting Council approval to bid this unit as specified.
Ken Kuchera
Fire Chief
cc: Larry Thompson
Truck Committee Members
FFD Board of Directors
fi
1992 4 X 4 1 TON
PICK-UP TRUCK
8 FT STYLESIDE
TYPE FOUR WHEEL DRIVE
GVWR 9,0001bs. MIN
WHEELBASE 131" minimum
ENGINE 7 4 liter V8 gas or larger
with oil cooler, heavy duty radiator
TRANSMISSION 4 speed automatic with auxiliary
transmission oil cooler
AXLES Front 4,000 lbs minimum
auto locking hubs
Rear 5,000 lbs minimum
Limited slip differential 4.10 ratio
Heavy duty springs front & rear
SHOCK ABSORBERS Heavy duty front and rear
BRAKES SERVICE Dual hydraulic, self adjusting, disc
front, power assist parking--cable to
rear
STEERING Power assist
CAB Standard, including dual exterior
Charcoal interior rear view mirrors below eye level . .
Vinyl seats, stainless
Rubber floor mat
ELECTRICAL ALTERNATOR 100 amp minimal -- BATTERY,heavy duty maintenance free
625 CCA minimum---AM radio--minimum
volt, temp, oil pressure gauges
WHEELS/TIRES---Steel belted radials LT 235/85 R 16 D, on/off road tread all
wheels, all terrain (furnish spare rim and tire)
COLOR---White
MISCELLANEOUS 19 gallon fuel tank-minimum/chrome rear step bumper/skid plates
front tow hooks/rust proofing/clearance lights
OPTIONS----AM-FM stereo / bed liner / cargo lamp
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO.
NAME: Larry Thompson C)-,-- ( C)/6:/4(C)/6:/4(
DEPARTMENT: Administration C-1-5-e-1°
Cyv�e,
DATE: October 1, 1991 -
i/
MEETING DATE: October 7, 1991 t` L�`QQ
CATEGORY: New Business 0 . -
SUBJECT: Approve Agreement with Knutson Recycling ' �" 0-f 7 (01;;---!)
EXPLANATION: Consider entering into an agreement relating to
the City taking its recyclables to Knutson in Rosemount. Cr‘-/''"1"
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY:
Sj.C2v
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Wayne Henneke Finance
Tom Kaldunski Public Works
Robert Williamson Solid Waste
t y
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: KNUTSON RECYCLING AGREEMENT
DATE: OCTOBER 3, 1991
Attached please find various information relating to an agreement with Knutson
Material Recovery Facility, Inc. (KMRF) located in Rosemount. As you will note,
it appears the City will at least break even with revenues, with saving occurring
with haul distances. Again, while I do not anticipate large savings at this
time, it will free up the worker's time which is necessary as more recyclable
items are added and the City grows.
/174)74749
Larry Thompson
City Administrator
cc: Robert Williamson
Wayne Henneke
Tom Kaldunski
file
LT/mh
_ AUG is 1991
DAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
TELEPHONE
612/438-4418
o`VA Co(, DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HWY 55- HASTINGS, MINNESOTA 55033
o' 1,4 e :ti'"7 ,?
=-,,,,---ci*,-..-,
*4-Jr
, . c2,
kIkNESO'
August 15, 1991
Larry Thompson
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, Minnesota 55024
Dear Larry:
Thank you for your letter regarding the use of the Recyclables
Collection Center (RCC) by the City of Farmington. The Dakota
County Recyclables Collection Center (RCC) is available to any
residential Dakota County recycling hauler as long as balanced
loads of material are delivered.
In part because of fewer haulers using the RCC, its long term
viability remains in question. Currently our lease arrangement
for the building remains in affect until April of 1993 .
Good luck with your recycling program and upcoming weight-based
fee system. If you have any questions or comments, do not
hesitate to contact me or Recycling Specialist Gayle Prest at
891-7020.
Sincerely,
L- W
Lyle J . Wray
COUN ADMINISTRATOR
LDW/jmn
LW-LT
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
MEMO TO: DAVE HARMEYER
SUBJECT: KNUTSON RECYCLING AGREEMENT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1991
Attached please find a copy of the revised Knutson recycling agreement. It is
my understanding that Points 1-12 would be attached to each agreement. I am
not certain if the "30 day non acceptance" clause under #7 applies to #6.
Also, would you determine the City's remedy if Knutson does not accept materials.
Please review the agreement and comment. I am anticipating placing this item
on the October 7th Council agenda.
/, ">12.7e4
Larry Thompson
City Administrator
cc: Tom Kaldunski
Bob Williamson
file
MEMO TO: BOB WILLIAMSON
SUBJECT: KNUTSON RECYCLING AGREEMENT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1991
Please be advised that I have forwarded a copy of the revised Knutson Recycling
agreement to Dave Harmeyer in anticipation of it being placed on the October 7th
Council agenda. I have reviewed the agreement noting the 30 day cancellation
period under #7. I am seeking an interpretation if this also applies to item
#6. Also, I am seeking an opinion of remedies available to the City if Knutson
breaches the contract. I assume you have compared the minimum amount of recyclables
required under the contract to the actual or estimated recyclables collected
by the City.
Again, projections indicate that the City should break even on recycling revenues
(as compared with the County's facility) with a savings occurring in haul distances.
The major drawback is switching from a facility which is backed by the County's
resources to a privately owned firm.
/a7 3%.17e
Larry Thompson
City Administrator
cc: Tom Kaldunski
Dave Harmeyer
file
•
•
..
CORRUGATED CARDBOARD PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VENDOR (NAME,STREET,ADDRESS,CITY STATE,AND ZIP CODE)
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street CONTACT PERSON:
Farmington, MN 55024 Robert Williamson
(612) 463-7111
HERE IN REFERRED TO AS VENDOR
DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY - QUANTITY
Consists of corrugated cardboard containers having liners of either test liner, jute,
or kraft. Prohibiting materials may not exceed 1%, additional outthrows may not
exceed 5%. Moisture content by weight shall not exceed 7%. Subject to Addendum A.
Vendor undertakes and commits to supply at least 110 tons of acceptable corrugated
cardboard. The obligation of KMRF to purchase corrugated cardboard shall not exceed
a maximum of 140 tons per year without written authorization by KMRF.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS COMMODITIES
PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS OF DELIVERY
KMRF shall pay Vendor a purchase price for acceptable corrugated cardboard determined
by multiplying the current unprocessed, local, spot market price (ULSM) by
the factor 1 (100%) . (Cardboard with magazines price $2.00/ton) .
Non conforming product loads will be processed by KMRF without payment to the City
(associated disposal cost borne by the City) or the loads may be rejected in their
entirity for return to the City of Farmington.
Holdback, as stated in provision 4, shall be 5% from purchase price.
The method of determining commodity weight shall be certified if source seperated-
(estimated if included with magazines/catalogs) .
CONTRACT PERIOD
Subject to the terms and provisions hereof, KMRF agrees to purchase from the Vendor
and Vendor agrees to sell and supply acceptable corrugated cardboard to KMRF for a
period of one (1) year from Nov. 4, 1991 ending Nov. 4, 1992. This contract may not be
reassigned.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS INITIAL TERM
Knutson Material Recovery Facility, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, with offices at 15120 Chippendale Avenue,
Rosemount, Minnesota, 55068, (herein referred to as KMRF) agrees to purchase, and vendor agrees to sell the
commodities according to the TERMS AND CONDITION APPEARING ABOVE AND ALSO THE TERMS APPEARING ON
THE BACK OF THIS CONTRACT. The parties ave executed this agreement by their respective agents,on the
following date: ®,�/
(date)
City of FarmingtonIWUTSONMAT''IALREP V ITY,INC.
By
Title__
Witness ��aC^' ------- Witnes 4 L ?4
BROWN/AMBER CONTAINER GLASS PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VENDOR (NAME,STREET,ADDRESS,CITY STATE,AND ZIP CODE)
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street CONTACT PERSON:
Farmington, MN 55024 Robert Williamson
(612) 463-7111
HERE IN REFERRED TO AS VENDOR
DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY - QUANTITY
Brown/Amber Container Glass - Source separated goods with less than 1%
contaminates or foreign materials and conforming to requirements esta-
blished by Anchor Glass and does not contain window glass, ceramics,
mirrors,insulators, clear or green/blue tints. No pieces shall be
smaller than 1/2" in size.
Vendor undertakes and commits to supply at least 6 tons of acceptable
brown/amber glass. The obligation of KMRF to purchase brown/amber glass
shall not exceed a maximum of 12 tons per year without written author-
ization by KMRF.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS COMMODITIES
PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS OF DELIVERY
KMRF shall pay Vendor a purchase price for acceptable brown/amber glass
determined by multiplying the current unprocessed, local, spot market
price (ULSM) by the factor .60 (60%) .
Non conforming product loads will be processed by KMRF without payment to
the City (associated disposal cost borne by the City) or the loads may be
rejected in their entirity for return to the City of Farmington.
Holdback, as stated in provision 4, shall be 5% from the purchase
price.
The method of determining commodity weight shall be estimated per volume.
CONTRACT PERIOD
Subject to the terms and provisions hereof, KMRF agrees to purchase from the Vendor
and Vendor agrees to sell and supply acceptable brown/amber glass to KMRF for a
period of one (1) year from Nov.4, 1991 ending Nov.4, 1992. This contract may not
be reassigned.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS INITIAL TERM
Knutson Material Recovery Facility, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, with offices at 15120 Chippendale Avenue,
Rosemount, Minnesota, 55068, (herein referred to as KMRF) agrees to purchase, and vendor agrees to sell the
commodities according to the TERMS AND CONDITION APPEARING ABOVE AND ALSO THE TERMS APPEARING ON
THE BACK OF THIS CONTRACT. The parties hav executed this agreement by their respective agents,on the
following date: // /8/9/
(date)
---City of Farmington —y-- KNUTSON MATEaRECO RY CILITY,INC.
By G� –
TitleMayor _ TitlC.°,4,1 ./49/2_/t —
Witness /"11-__-/.±../ ���` -- Witness es ��te� �-C
4.
TIN CANS PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VENDOR (NAME,STREET,ADDRESS,CITY STATE,AND ZIP CODE)
CITY OF FARMINGTON
325 Oak Street CONTACT PERSON:
Farmington, Mn 55024 Robert Williamson
(612) 463-7111
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS VENDOR
DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY - QUANTITY
Tin Cans - Source seperated, tin plated metalic cans with labels and food contaminates
removed.
Vendor undertakes and commits to supply at least 8 tons of acceptable tin cans.
The obligation of KMRF to purchase tin cans shall not exceed a maximum of 18 tons per
year without written authorization by KMRF.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS COMMODITIES
PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS OF DELIVERY
KMRF shall pay Vendor a purchase price for acceptable tin cans determined
by multiplying the current unprocessed, local, spot market price (ULSM) by
the factor .75 (75%) .
Non conforming product loads will be processed by KMRF without payment to the City
(associated disposal cost borne by the City) or the loads may be rejected in their
entirity for return to the City of Farmington.
Holdback, as stated in provision 4, shall be 5% from purchase price.
The method of determining commodity weight shall be estimated based on volumes.
CONTRACT PERIOD
Subject to the terms and provisions hereof, KMRF agrees to purchase from the Vendor
and Vendor agrees to sell and supply acceptable tin cans to KMRF for a
period of one (1) year from Nov.4, 1991 ending Nov. 4, 1992. This contract may not be
reassigned.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS INITIAL TERM
Knutson Material Recovery Facility, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, with offices at 15120 Chippendale Avenue,
Rosemount, Minnesota, 55068, (herein referred to as KMRF) agrees to purchase, and vendor agrees to sell the
commodities according to the TERMS AND CONDITION APPEARING ABOVE AND ALSO THE TERMS APPEARING ON
THE BACK OF THIS CONTRACT. The parties have executed this agreement by their respective agents,on the
following date: ////if/may/ 4
(date)
City of Farmington_ _---__— KNUTSON / TERI. "ECO Y FACILITY,INC.
B ill
Title__ _Mayor Title'° .W 6)
Witness�'�.r/13tiy / .... -- — Witness r-- 1.�,:C.?YZ 7 ��
PLASTICS PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VENDOR (NAME,STREET,ADDRESS,CITY STATE,AND ZIP CODE)
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
(612) 463-7111
HERE IN REFERRED TO AS VENDOR
DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY - QUANTITY
PLASTICS- Plastics commodities are those which are collected under
Dakota County mandate and are generally referred to a "those with a neck"
primarily consistently #1 P.E.T. and #2 H.D.P.E. No "rigid plastics" will
be accepted without prior consent of KMRF.
Vendor undertakes and commits to supply at least 6 tons of acceptable
plastics. The obligation of KMRF to purchase plastics shall not exceed
a maximum of 12 tons per year without written authorization by KMRF.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS COMMODITIES
PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS OF DELIVERY
KMRF shall pay Vendor a purchase price for acceptable plastics
determined by multiplying the current unprocessed, local, spot market
price (ULSM) by the factor .60 (60%) .
Non conforming product loads will be processed by KMRF without payment to
the City (associated disposal cost borne by the City) or the loads may be
rejected in their entirity for return to the City of Farmington.
Holdback, as stated in provision 4, shall be 5% from the purchase
price.
The method of determining commodity weight shall be estimated per volume.
CONTRACT PERIOD
Subject to the terms and provisions hereof, KMRF agrees to purchase from the Vendor
and Vendor agrees to sell and supply acceptable plastics to KMRF for a
period of one (1) year from Nov. 4, 1991 ending Nov. 4, 1992. This contract may not be
reassigned.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS INITIAL TERM
Knutson Material Recovery Facility, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, with offices at 15120 Chippendale Avenue,
Rosemount, Minnesota, 55068, (herein referred to as KMRF) agrees to purchase, and vendor agrees to sell the
commodities according to the TERMS AND CONDITION APPEARING ABOVE AND ALSO THE TERMS APPEARING ON
THE BACK OF THIS CONTRACT. The parties have a ecuted this agreement by their respective agents,on the
following date: // f//a/ —
(date) 7
Ci_y of Farmington KNUTSON MAT''I Rye FACILITY,INC.
Hbi
By _! ��"' �_— By� —
Title Mayor , Title –= --
Witness_ ,-',� WitnessG� .���y2 /7/z/6-7
HIGH QUALITY OFFICE PAPER PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VENDOR (NAME, STREET, ADDRESS, CITY STATE, AND ZIP CODE)
City of Farmington
Contact Person:
325 Oak Street
Robert Williamson
Farmington, MN 55024
(612) 463-7111
HERE IN REFERRED TO AS VENDOR
DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY - QUANTITY
High Quality Office Paper- Acceptable office papers include white letter-
head paper, white plain paper or bond copying paper, white typing paper
and writing papers, white computer print out paper, white windowless envel-
opes, white business forms and pastel colored paper.
Vendor undertakes and commits to supply at least 1 ton of acceptable
high quality office paper. The obligation of KMRF to purchase H.Q.Office
paper shall not exceed a maximum of 2 tons per year without written
authorization by KMRF.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS COMMODITIES
PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS OF DELIVERY
KMRF shall pay Vendor a purchase price for High Quality Office Paper
determined by multiplying the current unprocessed, local, spot market
price (ULSM) by the factor 1 (100%) .
Non conforming product loads will be processed by KMRF without payment to
the City (associated disposal cost borne by the City) or the loads may be
rejected in their entirity for return to the City of Farmington.
Holdback, as stated in provision 4, shall be 5% from the purchase
price.
The method of determining commodity weight shall be individual material
certified scaled weights.
CONTRACT PERIOD
Subject to the terms and provisions hereof, KMRF agrees to purchase from the Vendor
and Vendor agrees to sell and supply acceptable high quality office paper to KMRF for a
period of one (1) years from Nov. 4, 1991 ending Nov.4, 1992. This contract may not be
reassigned.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS INITIAL TERM
Knutson Material Recovery Facility, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, with offices at 15120 Chippendale
Avenue, Rosemount, Minnesota, 55068, (herein referred to as KMRF) agrees to purchase, and vendor
agrees to sell the commodities according to the TERMS AND CONDITION APPEARING ABOVE AND ALSO THE TERMS
APPEARING ON THE BACK OF THIS CONTRACT. The parties have executed this agreement by their respective
agents, on the following date:
100/
(date) S
City of Farmington
/�� ✓ KNUTSON MAS •EC• ERY FACILITY,
/� 4��L4 CLl/�/t INC.
L �.�
By 5F� By
Title Mayor Tit1= .-7/,i.r "se . 14—
witness °%
�/
�r Witness,�lLrh��2��22L
OLD NEWSPAPER (ONP) PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VENDOR (NAME,STREET,ADDRESS,CITY STATE,AND ZIP CODE)
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street CONTACT PERSON:
Farmington, MN 55024 Robert Williamson
(612) 463-7111
HERE IN REFERRED TO AS VENDOR
DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY - QUANTITY
Consists of newspaper stock (ONP) (#6-PS90) containing less than .005%
prohibited/ 2% outthrows materials and less than 5% other paper stock.
ONP may not have moisture exceeding 7% by weight. Subject to Addendum A.
Vendor undertakes and commits to supply at least 230 tons of acceptable
ONP. The obligation of KMRF to purchase ONP shall not exceed a maximum
of 315 tons per year without written authorization by KMRF.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS COMMODITIES
PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS OF DELIVERY
KMRF shall pay Vendor a purchase price of $2.00 per ton.
Non conforming product loads will be processed by KMRF without payment to
the City (associated disposal cost borne by the City) or the loads may be
rejected in their entirity for return to the City of Farmington.
Holdback, as stated in provision 4, shall be 5% from the purchase price.
The method of determining commodity weight shall be individual material
certified scaled weights.
CONTRACT PERIOD
Subject to the terms and provisions hereof, KMRF agrees to purchase from the Vendor
and Vendor agrees to sell and supply acceptable ONP to KMRF for a period of one (1)
year from Nov. 4 1991 ending Nov.4, 1992. This contract may not be reassigned.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS INITIAL TERM
Knutson Material Recovery Facility,Inc.a Minnesota corporation,with offices at 15120 Chippendale Avenue,Rosemount,
Minnesota,55068,(herein referred to as KMRF)agrees to purchase,and vendor agrees to sell the commodities according to
the TERMS AND CONDITION APPEARING ABOVE AND ALSO THE TERMS APPEARING ON THE BACK OF THIS CONTRACT.
The parties have executed this agreement by their respective� agents,on the following date:
ti
(fie)
City of Farmington KNUTSON • RIA REC ERY FACILI ,INC.
By52' By
Title jr Title�.��::aJ/ L- C.� ,�
Witness R -:, a�>��' '� WitneSS
}
GREEN/BLUE TINT CONTAINER GLASS PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VENDOR (NAME,STREET,ADDRESS,CITY STATE,AND ZIP CODE)
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street CONTACT PERSON:
Farmington, MN 55024 Robert Williamson
(612) 463-7111
HERE IN REFERRED TO AS VENDOR
DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY - QUANTITY
Green/Blue tint Container Glass - Source separated goods with less than 1%
contaminates or foreign materials and conforming to requirements esta-
blished by Anchor Glass and does not contain window glass, ceramics,
mirrors,insulators, clear or brown/amber tints. No pieces shall be
smaller than 1/2" in size.
Vendor undertakes and commits to supply at least 3 tons of acceptable
green/blue tint glass. The obligation of KMRF to purchase green/blue
tint glass shall not exceed a maximum of 6 tons per year without
written authorization by KMRF.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS COMMODRIES
PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS OF DELIVERY
KMRF shall pay Vendor a purchase price for acceptable green/blue tint
glass determined by multiplying the current unprocessed, local, spot
market price (ULSM) by the factor .60 (60%) .
Non conforming product loads will be processed by KMRF without payment to
the City (associated disposal cost borne by the City) or the loads may be
rejected in their entirity for return to the City of Farmington.
Holdback, as stated in provision 4, shall be 5% from the purchase
price.
The method of determining commodity weight shall be estimated per volume.
CONTRACT PERIOD
Subject to the terms and provisions hereof, KMRF agrees to purchase from the Vendor
and Vendor agrees to sell and supply acceptable green/blue glass to KMRF for a
period of one (1) year from Nov.4, 1991 ending Nov.4, 1992. This contract may not
be reassigned.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS INITIAL TERM
Knutson Material Recovery Facility, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, with offices at 15120 Chippendale Avenue,
Rosemount, Minnesota, 55068, (herein referred to as KMRF) agrees to purchase, and vendor agrees to sell the
commodities according to the TERMS AND CONDITION APPEARING ABOVE AND ALSO THE TERMS APPEARING ON
THE BACK OF THIS CONTRACT. The parties have executed this agreement by their respective agents,on the
following date: /f4-4
(date)
City of Farmington KNUTSON 'ECO FACILITY,INC.
BY --. ---- By— LA
Title__ Moor _ _ Title -' =
_�2 ._
Witness :` Witness - 7 :, f.c 241 •'
CLEAR CONTAINER GLASS PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VENDOR (NAME,STREET,ADDRESS,CITY STATE,AND ZIP CODE)
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street CONTACT PERSON:
Farmington, MN 55024 Robert Williamson
(612) 463-7111
HERE IN REFERRED TO AS VENDOR
DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY - QUANTITY
Clear Container Glass - Source separated goods with less than 1%
contaminates or foreign materials and conforming to requirements
established by Anchor Glass and does not contain window glass,
ceramics, mirrors,insulators, brown/amber or green tints. No pieces
shall be smaller than 1/2" in size.
Vendor undertakes and commits to supply at least 51 tons of acceptable
clear glass. The obligation of KMRF to purchase clear glass shall not
exceed a maximum of 102 tons per year without written authorization by
KMRF.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS COMMODITIES
PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS OF DELIVERY
KMRF shall pay Vendor a purchase price for acceptable clear glass
determined by multiplying the current unprocessed, local, spot market
price (ULSM) by the factor .60 (60%) .
Non conforming product loads will be processed by KMRF without payment to
the City (associated disposal cost borne by the City) or the loads may be
rejected in their entirity for return to the City of Farmington.
Holdback, as stated in provision 4, shall be 5% from the purchase
price.
The method of determining commodity weight shall be individual material
certified scaled weights.
CONTRACT PERIOD
Subject to the terms and provisions hereof, KMRF agrees to purchase from the Vendor
and Vendor agrees to sell and supply acceptable clear glass to KMRF for a period of
one (1) year from Nov.4, 1991 ending Nov.4, 1992. This contract may not be re-
assigned.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS INITIAL TERM
Knutson Material Recovery Facility, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, with offices at 15120 Chippendale Avenue,
Rosemount, Minnesota, 55068, (herein referred to as KMRF) agrees to purchase, and vendor agrees to sell the
commodities according to the TERMS AND CONDITION APPEARING ABOVE AND ALSO THE TERMS APPEARING ON
THE BACK OF THIS CONTRACT. The parties have executed this agreement by their respective agents,on the
following date: ///I��,
(date)
•
City of Farmington KNUTSON MA VIAL—CO RYFACILffY,INC.
et
B Y E ------- By --- ----
Title Mayor Titleti2r —
Witness LC7j<s'.4?-7,Z1/7,� ',.1, =�„'�
MAGAZINE (CMG) PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VENDOR (NAME, STREET, ADDRESS, CITY STATE, AND ZIP CODE)
CITY OF FARMINTON CONTACT PERSON:
325 OAK STREET ROBERT WILLIAMSON
FARMINGTON, MN 55024 HERE IN REFERRED TO AS VENDOR
(612) 463-7111
DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY - QUANTITY
Consists of magazine stock(OMG), catalogs, and certain other glossy
materials, (#27-5-PS90)containing fresh, dry pre/post consumer coated
magazine and may not contain more than 5% other paper stock, 1% outthrows,
and 0% prohibited materials, as covered in Addendum A. 0MG may not have
moisture exceding 7% by weight. Subject to Addendum A.
Vendor undertakes and commits to supply entire quantities collected
through curbside recycling system or other approved collection
programs.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS COMMODITIES
PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS OF DELIVERY
KMRF shall pay Vendor a purchase price for acceptable OMG of $2.00/ton.
Non conforming product loads will be processed by KMRF without payment to
the City (associated disposal cost borne by the City) or the loads may be
rejected in their entirity for return to the City of Farmington.
Holdback, as stated in provision 4, shall be 5% from the purchase
price.
The method of determining commodity weight shall be certified scale
weights provided source seperated/estimated if included with cardboard.
CONTRACT PERIOD
Subject to the terms and provisions hereof, KMRF agrees to purchase from the Vendor
and Vendor agrees to sell and supply acceptable magazines to KMRF for a period of
one (1) years from Nov.4, 1991 ending Nov.4, 1992. This contract may not be reassigned.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS INITIAL TERM
Knutson Material Recovery Facility, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, with offices at 15120 Chippendale
Avenue, Rosemount, Minnesota, 55068, (herein referred to as KMRF) agrees to purchase, and vendor
agrees to sell the commodities according to the TERMS AND CONDITION APPEARING ABOVE AND ALSO THE TERMS
APPEARING ON THE BACK OF THIS CONTRACT. The par1iesh ve executed this agree - by their respe ive
agents, on the following date: /////r/9/
City of Farmington (date) KNUTSON ' RI RECOV _Y FACILITTY,
Q / j INC.
By I A.1.111( By
In
Title/ Mayor r� Title '-21 ✓t 4 ( -)
, - /
Witness, ' 6,///7 �� Witness f_1(r(�`� e':22'7//'7k'
ALUMINUM CANS PURCHASE AGREEMENT
VENDOR (NAME, STREET, ADDRESS, CITY STATE, AND ZIP CODE)
City of Farmington
CONTACT PERSON:
325 Oak Street
Robert Williamson
Farmington, Mn 55024
(612) 463-7111
DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY - QUANTITY
Aluminum Cans - Aloy cans containing aluminum alloy. Source seperated-
These cans must not contain residue liquid or content.
Additional products containing aluminum or its alloy must receive written
permission prior to their drop off (i.e. aluminum foil, aluminum casings,
etc.)
Vendor undertakes and commits to supply at least 8 tons of acceptable
aluminum cans. The obligation of KMRF to purchase aluminum cans shall not
exceed a maximum of 18 tons per year without written authorization by
KMRF. HEREIN REFERRED TO AS COMMODITIES
PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS OF DELIVERY
KMRF shall pay Vendor a purchase price for acceptable aluminum cans
determined by multiplying the current unprocessed, local, spot market
price (ULSM) by the factor .75 (75%) .
Non conforming product loads will be processed by KRMF without payment to
the City (associated disposal cost borne by the City) or the loads may be
rejected in their entirity for return to the City of Farmington.
Holdback, as stated in provision 4, shall be 5% from the purchase
price.
The method of determining commodity weight shall be individual material
certified scaled weights.
CONTRACT PERIOD
Subject to the terms and provisions hereof, KMRF agrees to purchase from the Vendor
and Vendor agrees to sell and supply acceptable aluminum cans to KMRF for a period of
one (1) year from Nov. 4, 1991 ending Nov.4, 1992. This contract may not be re-
assigned.
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS INITIAL TERM
Knutson Material Recovery Facility, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, with offices at 15120 Chippendale
Avenue, Rosemount, Minnesota, 55068, (herein referred to as KMRF) agrees to purchase, and vendor
agrees to sell the commodities according to the TERMS AND CONDITION APPEARING ABOVE AND ALSO THE TERMS
APPEARING ON THE BACK OF THIS CONTRACT. The Parti s hav executed this agreemen •'their respecti e
agents, on the following date: // /6v9/
City of Farmington (da e)
KNUTSON 'IA RECOV Y FACILITY,
By ;7641., INC.
a.-e-<,_....,By
Title Mayor >, -
Title '
��
Witness Witness i� �{ '
W y N to U) W CO Cl) cn w
, 5 Cu CU as :� :U :U co cU as
> H HHH HH H H H H
F- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 Ti 0 0 0 0 0
zo co E E E E E E E co E
01-
V E E E E E E E E E E
CO � � CDCDU)U) OW CD
U.CC
CC L L .0 C .0 t L t L .0
Y C C C C C C C C C C
CO Co CC) N- f- N Z
J t x x x x x x 0 u)cncn
Q O 222 Sc2 2 o J J
> N J J J J CO J CV
60 0 0 0 0 > > ea
J J J
o 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 Z
W W W w W W
.iii Umm U U m 00 U U
wW U) CO Cl) U z
w w w CCCC
u_
~ >' z WcOv) U) U) U) CO z m
coc W O O CO CO CO CO m Q 0 0 w
N W Co CV O O O O Z N U
o m v .—
Co a cn
2 a
< •i J r 0 co
J d Q N N 0
-1 E Z co O r Cp CC) co Q — 0)
0 Z c") coo ci 66 p z r0 v Z o
Co 0 Q N in - ¢• O0
O ca 0 co m Z_
m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a=00L-..- 0 c04C
�- oo) CC
m F- I- I- I- in uJ LU LU J J J 0 J o H I- J Q
U v W < Q Q Q Z O 0 O m O m Q LL Z
... > C[ C= CC Cr a z Z Z 0 Z 0 CC W 0 0
z c w a a. a a U Q , Q a a O w 0
o 0
0 G U wWWW
w w O0 O O U O U co > m J Z
o U H V) m Q F- > Q
V Z W Z Z Z W Y W --I W E N ? Z O
Om m ,
-, a ~ cUn � U 5 ZQp z 0H -13
oQ0OO
0
a, -70 o 5 553 UJ g m 3 � U �
CC W H H H w O w• z U ti .z . o. W ¢ o H
N d Cl) V 000 co H °- Co 0 V a a _ Z0_ CCC
ZO 10 = UUU E2 U > E000 ^ N
o m Z t- Z N o
z W £ w 3 Z P _ CO
� Fm- Zci Cl) 0 - J Q a o-J re IIJ w
< 00 I F- Co Q co a
11-LLaZ 0 0O a ¢ co a 0 a.
00E0 20 Cl) co N co cd O
0
Q O m
Umwm OZ C0'3 0 a 0 0 z
T, AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. 5
NAME: Karen Finstuen
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: August 20,1991
MEETING DATE: October 7, 1991
CATEGORY: Consent Agenda
SUBJECT: Adopt an Ordinance Amending Tree Reforestation
EXPLANATION: Staff recommends that the City Planner,
as landscape expert for the City, make recommendations
to the Reforestation Commission
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Ordinance - Karen Finstuen
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administrator
Tom Kaldunski Public Works
ieL Tooker Planner
Karen Finstuen Administration
CAW. la4V.WZAD.#
SIGNATURE
PROPOSED
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE
An Ordinance Amending Title 2, Chapter 10, Section 3 of the City Code
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: Title 2, Chapter 10, Section 3 of
the City Code shall be amended by
adding (underlined) and deleting (etreseb) as follows:
2-10-3: Composition: Terms of Office: The Commission shall be composed of
the five (5) member City Council,
the Chair of the Planning Commission and the Chair of the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Commission and shall run concurrently with the primary office held.
Election or appointment to a primary position means automatic membership on
the Commission. The Mayor shall be allowed to appoint the Pe:bl#e-Werke-B#reeter
City Planner to provide recommendations to the Commission and to ensure that
the duties and responsibilities of the Reforestation Advisory Commission are
performed as outlined in this Chapter.
SECTION II: After adoption, signing and attestation
this ordinance shall be published
one time in the official newspaper of the City and shall be in effect on and
after the day following such publication.
Enacted and ordained the 7th day of October, 1991.