Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11.18.91 Council Packet AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR NOVEMBER 18, 1991 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. APPROVE MINUTES a. November 4, 1991 - Regular Meeting 4. CITIZENS COMMENTS 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Preliminary Review of Silver Springs - Continued from 11/4/91 b. Set Public Hearing to Review Grading Permits c. 7:30 P.M. - Consider Proposed Assessment Roll - Project No. 91-1 d. 7:30 P.M. - Consider Proposed Assessment Roll - Project No. 91-10 e. 8:30 P.M. - Consider Various Liquor Licenses and Therapeutic Massage License 6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Proclaim Women's Bowling Week 7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS a. Resolution Adopting MUSA Boundaries Policy b. Resolution Adopting Delinquent Municipal Services Certification 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. 1992 Budget - Schedule Work Sessions 9. NEW BUSINESS a. Project 91-10 - Middle School Project 10. MISCELLANEOUS 11. CONSENT AGENDA a. Agreement with HRA - Cable Across Third Street b. Budget Adjustments c. Snow Removal Agreement with MnDOT d. Capital Outlay Request - Fire e. Approve Donation to Senior Center f. Approve Payment of the Bills 12. ADJOURN 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION a. Local 320 Contract Negotiations J AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. NAME: Karen Finstuen DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: November 12, 1991 MEETING DATE: November 18, 1991 CATEGORY: Public Hearings SUBJECT: 8:30 P.M. - Review Various Liquor Licenses/Therapeutic Massage License EXPLANATION: REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Applications - Karen Finstuen REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Karen Finstuen Administration Dan Siebenaler Police SIGNATURE &1P-75.0 0 _63—Application for"ON SALE"License for Intoxicating Liquor. Business Records Coni. ' "ON SALE" *tate of f Hinnegota, 1 COUNTY' OF 120—.1,.. . 1 .11U�V'ICIP.4LITF OF J.4.r.ml.lo.:C1 TO THE GOVERNING BODr OF THE .ABOVE N.1.1IED MUNICIP.4LITY: / �y� /_ Pursuant to Chapter 46 of the laws of Minnesota, Special Session of 1933-4... X14 L..A7... .. alC Qrs....Pres//.Eu....il Agri ..fider/)r,ses,...Ji. ,......'Pe , l_n .6r..etnelL &41601 V Edeky hereby applies for a license, for the term of..... lte year- from the day of .Q.11.i,1.r�.C. v 19. M.., to sell intoxicating liquors as defined by law at retail only for consumption "OX THE PREM ISES" described as follows: Je f ‘,9'--- ‘9.r..e..4.1 / ., .rm/.. . .,t) ) ``,�I.in, said gym[municipality, on which premises he control.. and operate a (80 ti 4 r�aelf..11./`4 SCC ...; and to that end hereby represents..and states ; That said municipality is a C't: which has a population of and which does not maintain an exclusive liquor store; l &tooX) 14a6Ry That said ecry:.Lt.7`+°.Y.�?L.(se‘, tle.....PM., 20/1 ,6ra?iC� is an establishment having a resident proprietor and manager and the following equipment and facilities, raletit.am. .eid Q izd ze u r�.i np.f? sere r t.....c��r?er6`.e, €2..} Y. eSt 4.ura.x ante .b.t2r. • That said applicant 1 S citizen of the United States, l S over twenty-one years of age, IS of good moral character and repute, has. not, since the enactment of the act above specified, been convicted of any wilful violation of any law of the Uniited States, or of the State of Minnesota, or of any local ordinance, with regard to the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possession for distribution, or sale, of intoxicating liquors, and that no license issued to I 1 in under said act has ever been revoked: That no manufacturer or wholesaler will own or control, or has any financial interest in, the business of selling intoxicating liquors at retail on said premises, nor power to exact or require, by con- tract, understanding or otherwise, said applicant to handle or sell only the products of such manu- facturer or wholesaler: That no other retailer's license has been issued, directly or indirectly, to said applicant or for said premises; that no license of a class other than hereby applied for has been issued to any person at said premises; and that said premises are neither owned or controlled by any person to whom no license could be issued: That said premises are not within any area within which the sale of intoxicating liquors is pro- hibited by the laws of the State of Minnesota, the provisions of any charter, ordinance or special law, or through zoning ordinances, proceedings or legal process regularly held for that purpose: That said applicant hereby agrees that any license granted pursuant hereto shall be non- transferable without consent of the authority issuing the same; that said license shall not be effective until a permit shall be issued under the laws of the United States in case such permit is required under said laws; and that tl 6 will keep said license posted in a conspicuous place in said premises: • That this application, is made pursuant and subject to all the laws of Minnesota, the laws of the United States, the ordinances and regulations of said municipality, and the regulations of the Liquor Control Commissioner of Minnesota, relating to the sale and places of sale of intoxicating liquors, all of which are hereby made a part hereof, and which h.e, hereby agrees to observe and obey. That said applicant further states that by the commencement of business and by July 1 of each succeeding year said applicant will have paid the Federal Special Occupational Tax to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for a retail dealer. 1 —Application for"ON SALE"License for Intoxicating Liquor. Business Records Coro. "ON SALE" Special Sunday *tate of jHfnnelota, COUNTY OF A4-4./ 1 MUNICIPXLITY OF 71- TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE .4BOVE N,1.1IED .1fUNICIP.4LITY: Pursuant to Chapter 46 of the laws of Minnesota, Special Session of 1933-4 Fn/1t° `i...h�•..Fh�PG e eS C�/1r 'es ,De4er1 fi /effir 'Rs.....ine . 741>g.,' kevvitaitek 64.4.0.>t. 6aie.e# hereby applets for a license, for the term of...........Gt.%1..Q y e rfrom the fSt day of . 1l /•( 19.. to sell intoxicating liquors as defined by law at retail only for consumption "ON THE PRE.IIISES" described as follows: ae'9a-le &Cee; , .A.r..mi7I :/e:.) , 04/ 7 in said municipality, on which premises A. controls and operate a r (?1tif et7%l!C![.. .t ; and to that end hereby represent and stateS ; That said municipality is a Cz Li which has a population of and which does not maintain an exclusive liquor store; &LIM n ti Fafelkf That said..De,i.eri... ..rl..i e.cp1 z .c3s.... .Ili P84 Lely .dr¢11CO- is an establishnzMt having a resident proprietor and manager and the following equipment and facilities, .aat.1�ll 1Lt Q.Ad..../t..1tl . u/-es it e C es.4 4�r..c 1t prate,�e, a 1 Y LL, � I res ?iuc.a..lt.t 4..nd bltr That said applicant t S citizen of the United States, 1 S over twenty-one years of age, 16 of good moral character and repute, )14,s not, since the enactment of the act above specified, been convicted of any wilful violation of any law of the United States, or of the State of Minnesota, or of any local ordinance, with regard to the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possession for distribution or sale, of intoxicating liquors, and that no license issued to.......II..LiII under said act has ever been revoked: That no manufacturer or wholesaler will own or control, or has any financial interest in, the business of selling intoxicating liquors at retail on said premises, nor power to exact or require, by con- tract, understanding or otherwise, said applicant IS to handle or sell only the products of such manu- facturer or wholesaler: That no other retailer's license has been issued, directly or indirectly, to said applicant or for said premises; that no license of a class other than hereby applied for has been issued to any person at said premises; and that said premises are neither owned. or controlled by any person to whom no license could be issued: That said premises are not within any area within which the sale of intoxicating liquors is pro- hibited by the laws of the State of Minnesota, the provisions of any charter, ordinance or special law, or through zoning ordinances, proceedings or legal process regularly held for that purpose: That said applicant hereby agree," that any license granted pursuant hereto shall be non- transferable without consent of the authority issuing the same; that said license shall not be effective until a permit shall be issued under the laws of the United States in case such permit is required under said laws; and that will keep said license posted in a conspicuous place in said premises: That this application is made pursuant and subject to all the laws of Minnesota, the laws of the United States, the ordinances and regulations of said municipality, and the regulations of the Liquor Control Commissioner of Minnesota, relating to the sale and places of sale of intoxicating liquors, all of which are hereby made a part hereof, and which tie, hereby agree3 to observe and obey. That said applicant further states that by the commencement of business and by July 1 of each succeeding year said applicant will have paid the Federal Special Occupational Tax to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for a retail dealer. 4t' (015.001. .40.263—Application for"ON SALE"License for Intoxicating Liquor. Business Records Coro. • "ON SALE" *tate of JHfnnegota, l _ COUNTY' OF .11 UNICIP.4LITY OF /c4. i` j►'i t t"/ 4�H TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE .ABOVE N.1.11ED .11UNICIP,4LITY: Pursuant to Chapter 46 of the laws of Minnesota, Special Session of 1.933-4 C> 117 ..it-t11 111 L c?do S -7;4 • hereby appl.a'C ..fora license, for the term of l'� G'="c 1� t' from, the J day of 61 ZL.d..&^..y 19..99., , to sellintoxicating liquors as defined by law at retail only for consumption "ON THE PREMISES" described as follows: r' 7 +r.) t• /1. in said municipality, on which premises control and operate a 1 /4 e.) ;"t c l'es ' ..t2.e.,'•d1;kid to that end hereby represent and state ; That said municipality is a. `t i 74' I i I et relic? (2:u z� y / which/has a, population of )�1`' 2/1 / and which does not maintain an exclusive liquor store; That said / u. > `i C' (71i e) is an establishment having a resident proprietor and manager and the following equipment and fceilities, :I-4 41' z 44 c`) !�e`ct%/1 i'17 • That said applicant 7V? `? citizen of the United States, cq"d 15 over twenty-one years of age, c1 tt,/ ofgood moral character and repute, �� p not, since the enactment of the act above specified, been convicted of any wilful violation of any law of the United States, or of the State of Minnesota, or of any local ordinance, with regard to the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possession for distribution or sale, of intoxicating liquors, and that no license issued to under said act has ever been revoked: That no manufacturer or wholesaler will own or control, or has any financial interest in, the business of selling intoxicating liquors at retail on said premises, nor power to exact or require, by con- tract, understanding or otherwise, said applicant...4.5..to handle or sell only the products of such manu- f acturer or wholesaler: That no other retailer's license has been issued, directly or Lnairectly, to said applicant._5 or for said premises; that no license of a class other than hereby applied for has been issued to any person at said premises; and that said premises are neither owned or controlled by any person to whom no license could be issued: That said premises are not within any area within zvhich the sale of intoxicating liquors is pro- hibited by the laws of the State of Minnesota, the provisions of any charter, ordinance or special law, or through zoning ordinances, proceedings or legal process regularly held for that purpose: That said applicant hereby agree.S that any license granted pursuant hereto shall be non- transferable without consent of the authority issuing the same; that said license shall not be effective until a permit shall be issued under the laws of the United States in case such permit is required under said laws; and that It ,~' will keep said license posted in a conspicuous place in said premises: That this application is made pursuant and subject to all the laws of Minnesota, the laws of the United States, the ordinances and regulations of said municipality, and the regulations of the Liquor Control. Commissioner of Minnesota, relating to the sale and places of sale of intoxicating liquors, all of which are hereby made a part hereof, and which A a hereby agree.,5 to observe and obey. That said applicant further states that by the commencement of business and by July 1 of each succeeding year said applicant will have paid the Federal Special Occupational Tax to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for a retail dealer. J.263—Application for"ON SALE"License for Intoxicating Liquor. Business Records Coro. "ON SALE" Special Sunday *tate of JHf nnegota, l COUNTY OF ,�_,!.�).... ". .t! !( ,11UXICIP.4LITY OF . Fel +e14vf? y. Lt TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE .4BOVE X,1.1fED .IIUNICIP.4LITY: Pursuant to Chapter 46 of the laws of .Minnesota, Special Session of 1933-4 ,' hereby appl..,4'.,';.4'...Vor a license, for the term of t'; ' eel pi S from- the It day of �dvlL/,7k-7 19....9.,Z., to sell intoxicating liquors as definedjby law at retail only for consumption "ON THE PREMISES" described as follows: /-cl4'IYt,.,L; Zc >tt 4--_1t/+ C`i 44,-r( /L`"aZ t.,{3vy7" -- -2 7 ! ,},it /-QI.,<,..,t,y be Li /41h. in said municipality, on which premises It-/ (' control and operate a '' 1 1 �c _,I/0 `. L c, N, 4 '"✓ L,7/ A c'':)'t i^.,r,,,,..+.�.!; and to that end hereby represent and, state ; / �f� (...- e t.." y yTThat said municipality is a % ' which has a population of Sd-i-<� and which does not maintain an exclusive liquor store; That Said a) �*1 r u,�% i.`'"1 L t3 H e..°� is an establishment having a. resident 2 proprietor and manager and the following equipment and facilities, / .2 <<t-a C /7c''"' h 1'y' �1 ,..t �� ..,1.'.r^.1 1...E .17 ,;:I. � « t i ,c. C.d.y"ci(J 47 That said applicant / ".? eZ. citizen of the United States, uc''CI )`.1 over twenty-one years of age, �''"'�� of good moral character and repute, A cr not, since the enactment of the act above specified, been convicted of any wilful violation of any law of the United States, or of the State of Minnesota, or of any local ordinance, with regard to the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possession for distribution or sale, of intoxicating liquors, and that no license issued to under said act has ever been revoked: That no manufacturer or wholesaler will own or control, or has any financial interest in, the business of selling intoxicating liquors at retail on,said premises, nor power to exact or require, by con- tract, understanding or otherwise, said applicant....I oto handle or sell only the products of such manu- facturer or wholesaler: That no other retailer's license has been issued, directly or indirectly, to said applicant.S or for said premises; that no license of a class other than hereby applied for has been issued to any person at said premises; and that said premises are neither owned or controlled by any person to whom no license could be issued: That said premises are not within any area within which the sale of intoxicating liquors is pro- hibited by the laws of the State of Minnesota, the provisions of any charter, ordinance or special law, or through zoning ordinances, proceedings or legal process regularly held for that purpose: That said applicant hereby agree,15 that any license granted pursuant hereto shall be non- transferable without consent of the authority issuing the same; that said license shall not be effective until a permit shall be issued under the laws of the United States in case such permit is required under said laws; and that A C will keep said license posted in a conspicuous place in said premises: That this application is made pursuant and subject to all the laws of Minnesota, the laws of the United States, the ordinances and regulations of said municipality, and the regulations of the Liquor Control Commissioner of Minnesota, relating to the sale and places of sale of intoxicating liquors, all of which are hereby made a part hereof, and which )1 C hereby agree..) to observe and obey. That said applicant further states that by the coinmencement of business and by July 1 of each succeeding year said applicant will have paid the Federal Special Occupational Tax to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for a retail dealer. .O.263—Application for"ON SALE"License for Intoxicating Liquor. Business Records Coro. "ON SALE" *tate of jHinnegota, �(( COUNTY OF 0q./, D I4 1 .WUXICIP�4LITY OF /C1/4e11.1" ./ 4./.P/'? TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE .1BOVE N.1.IIED JIUNICIP.4LITY: Pursuant to Chapter 46 of the laws of Minnesota, Special Session of 1933-4 hereby appl for a license, for the term of �.�(�'......_ from the /sr day of Jan t)4 Y`I 19...7 ., to sell intoxicating liquors as defined by law at retail only for consumption "ON THE PREMISES" described as follows: sr far'nt1rift°..17.....).���/7 in said municipality, on which premises 4/ Gen Se a control...S and operate a I S./.4.U.r.4.11I " C.(..u..b ; and to that end hereby represent and state ; That said municipality is a which has a population of and which does114' not maintain an. exclusive liquor store; • That said /1tn.GI".1.,44.. e�J/onCiu._ 1.f s an establishment having a resident proprietor and manager and the following equipment and facilities, fCs.7q1f.ra Club That said applicant citizen of the United States, over twenty-one years of age, of good moral character and repute, not, since the enactment of the act above specified, been convicted of any wilful violation of any law of the United States, or of the State of Minnesota, or of any local ordinance, with regard to the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possession for distribution or sale, of intoxicating liquors, and that no license issued to under said act has ever been revoked: That no manufacturer or wholesaler will own or control, or has any financial interest in, the business of selling intoxicating liquors at retail on said premises, nor power to exact or require, by con- tract, understanding or otherwise, said applicant to handle or sell only the products of such manu- facturer or wholesaler: That iso other retailer's i-icense has been issued, directly or indirectly, to said applicant or for said premises; that no license of a class other than hereby applied for has been issued to any person at said premises; and that said premises are neither owned or controlled by any person to whom no license could be issued: That said premises are not within any area within which the sale of intoxicating liquors is pro- hibited by the laws of the State of Minnesota, the provisions of any charter, ordinance or special law, or through zoning ordinances, proceedings or legal process regularly held for that purpose: That said applicant hereby agree that any license granted pursuant hereto shall be non- transferable without consent of the authority issuing the same; that said license shall not be effective until a permit shall be issued under the laws of the United States in case such permit is required under said laws; and that will keep said license posted in a.conspicuous place in said premises: That this application is made pursuant and subject to all the laws of Minnesota, the laws of the United States, the ordinances and regulations of said municipality, and the regulations of the Liquor Control Commissioner of Minnesota, relating to the sale and places of sale of intoxicating liquors, all of which are hereby made a part hereof, and which hereby agree to observe and obey. That said applicant further states that by the commencement of business and by July 1 of each succeeding year said applicant will have paid the Federal Special Occupational Tax to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for a retail dealer. ,263—Application for"ON SALE"License for Intoxicating Liquor. Business Records Coro. "ON SALE" Special Sunday estate of ,Hinnegota, COUNTY OF pq../?.Ltiel ! MUXICIP.4LITY OF lqr?M V To TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE .ABOVE N.1.1IED .1!UXICIP,4LITY: Pursuant to Chapter 46 of the laws of Minnesota, Special Session of 1933-4 hereby appl for a license, for the term of ///3 from, the /S,74- day of Jan.L44F y 19..f. -., to sell intoxicating liquors as defined by law at retail only for consumption "ON THE PREMISES" described as follows: /D /y Sr rm.t' T /1//7 in said municipality, on which premises.)/cense e- control,...5. and operate a fie S .t(.ran1 Cu..D ; and to that end hereby represent and state ; That said municipality is a which has a population of /��f and which does not maintain an exclusive liquor store; That said.../. "..72 e✓'t can ��j./�ph � I, is an establishment having a resident proprietor and manager and the following equipment and facilities, 11114h / y Cf1b That said applicant citizen of the United States, over twenty-one years of age, of good moral character and repute, not, since the enactment of the act above specified, been convicted of any wilful violation of any law of the United States, or of the State of Minnesota, or of any local ordinance, with regard to the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possession for distribution or sale, of intoxicating liquors, and that no license issued to under said act has ever been revoked: That no manufacturer or wholesaler will own or control, or has any financial interest in, the business of selling intoxicating liquors at retail on said premises, nor power to exact or require, by con- tract, understanding or otherwise, said applicant to handle or sell only the products of such manu- facturer or wholesaler: That no other retailer's license has been issued, d' •ectiy 07' indirectly, to said applicant or for said premises; that no license of a class other than hereby applied for has been issued to any person at said premises; and that said premises are neither owned or controlled by any person to whom no license could be issued: That said premises are not within any area within which the sale of intoxicating liquors is pro- hibited by the laws of the State of Minnesota, the provisions of any charter, ordinance or special law, or through zoning ordinances, proceedings or legal process regularly held for that purpose: That said applicant hereby agree that any license granted pursuant hereto shall be non- transferable without consent of the authority issuing the same; that said license shall not be effective until a permit shall be issued under the laws of the United States in case such permit is required under said laws; and that will keep said license posted in a conspicuous place in said premises: That this application is made pursuant and subject to all the laws of Minnesota, the laws of the United States, the ordinances and regulations of said municipality, and the regulations of the Liquor Control Commissioner of Minnesota, relating to the sale and places of sale of intoxicating liquors, all of which are hereby made a part hereof, and which hereby agree to observe and obey. That said applicant further states that by the commencement of business and by July 1 of each succeeding year said applicant will have paid the Federal Special Occupational Tax to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for a retail dealer. ')007 .00 F)t�_.. XB3—Application for"ON SALE"License for Intoxicating Liquor. Business Records Coro. "ON SALE" SPECIAL SUNDAY *tate of Minnesota, COUNTY OF P74 1<" - 1 .IIUXICl/MLITY OF F/ /' ' //ll :(pit) TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE .4BOVE N.l.IIED JIUNICIP,ILITY: Pursuant to Chapter 46 of the laws of .Minnesota, Special Session of 1933-4 / hereby applli for a license, for the term of cJ T-- •� o � from the day of....(�/. ' /(-' c, -, 19� .T , to sell intoxicating liquors as defined by law at retail only for consumption "OA' THE PREMISES" described as follows: / 1 ..i 5 x ,fill!7 -'l ..TC,'/� i in said municipality, on which premises / control and operate a fl.r)..5 `- ...; and to that end hereby represent end, stater ; That said municipality is a � / IL-7 which has a population of 0 ) and which does not maintain an exclusive liquor store; That said 4.19U'I. is an establishment having a resident proprietor and manager and the following equipment and facilities, 7 f 1 _ ? �C'�S , ,!C�... ../�.. lit 6,'.',;' , 4-= r,�'1 (. /"/f TG/?c � '[ L'�7C^/cam✓ That said applicant....../.. citizen of the United States, ,/J.L(-'..0....../< over twenty-one years of age, /5 of good moral character and repute,............./I.p.S not, since the enactment of the act above specified, been convicted of any wilful violation of any law of the United States, or of the State of Minnesota, or of any local ordinance, with regard to the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possession for distribution or sale, of intoxicating liquors, and that no license issued to PG LL under said act has ever been revolted: That no manufacturer or wholesaler will own or control, or has any financial interest in, the business of selling intoxicating liquors at retail on said premises, nor power to exact or require, by con- tract, understanding or otherwise, said applicant to handle or sell only the products of such manu- facturer or wholesaler: That no other retailer's lLcen3e has been issued, r"irecr:'y or indirecely, to said applicant._5 or for said premises; that no license of a class other than hereby applied for has been issued to any person at said premises; and that said premises are neither owned or controlled by any person to whom no license could be issued: That said premises are not within any area within which the sale of intoxicating liquors is pro- hibited by the laws of the State of Minnesota, the provisions of any charter, ordinance or special law, or through zoning ordinances, proceedings or legal process regularly held for that purpose: That said applicant ` hereby agree that any license granted pursuant hereto shall be non- transferable without consent of the authority issuing the same; that said license shall not .be effective until a permit shall be issued under the laws of the United. States in case such permit is required under said laws; and that., -::/ .( :`.,..(..W.ewill keep said license posted in a conspicuous place in said premises: That this application is made pursuant and subject to all the laws of Minnesota, the laws of the United States, the ordinances and regulations of said municipality, and the regulations of the Liquor Control Commissioner of Minnesota, relating to the sale and places of sale of intoxicating liquors, all of which are hereby made a part hereof, and which ed:�L--6---c).... ..hereby agree to observe and obey. That said applicant further states that by the commencement of business and by July 1 of each succeeding year said applicant will have paid the Federal Special Occupational Tax to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for a retail dealer. 300 .00 p& PS 9016(11-891 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 333 SIBLEY • ST. PAUL, MN 55101 PHONE (612) 296-6434 APPLICATION FOR CLUB ON SALE RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSE This application shall be completed by an officer of the club seeking a license. This application and the proof of liquor liability insurance must be filed with the city clerk or the county auditor. To qualify for a license a club must have at least fifty members, been in continuous existence for at least three years, have an elected governing board and limit sales to members and bona fide quests only. The annual license fee is set by statute (M.S. 340A.408). Granting of a license by the city or county is discretionary. TYPE OR PRINT Corporation Name Club Trade Name or DBA 0912-m/)14.r' E/1-66-3 License Location(Street Address) License Period Business Phone 31 3 3 S .— From / 1/ / g 2 To//3//q (I/L► 4/66)�y�r Municipality County State Zip Code ►2 4y1 l ry 1)/4-fto r l4 mu) _SS–1 AV • Building Owner's Name Building Owner's Address rqp-11-7 /led–) F'4-n�n 06 7DW 1E- fit.� s )0 s-�a Club Manager's Name Are there any delinquent taxes on the property? D.Yes 4 No #/€64-/e-C-7" F,�o e Name of Member of Managing Board Address S /. n ► TT E 3 34 meq 44 s?. u 4'94/0 Name of Member of Managing Board Address k) l EL 1267 stinnv‘/de ph. F0.1). Name of Member of Managing Board Address 74'1 /L r;o s Trea rvi /0 ) G t` s r P /i) • Name of Member of Managing Board Address Duan F,?4it'Kkr". 20 l p/ d/540 The Licensee must have one of the following: CHECK ONE I I A. Liquor Liability Insurance(Dram Shop)—S50,000 per person; $100,000 more than one person; $10,000 property destruction; $50,000 and $100,000 for loss of means of support. ATTACH "CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE"TO THIS FORM • OR B. A Surety bond from a surety company with minimum coverage as specified above in A. OR I C. A certificate from the State Treasurer that the Licensee has deposited with the State, Trust Funds having a market value of $100,000 or $100,000 in cash or securities. Give Date of Club Charter Date of Incorporation / ,...L2_. �j�7 Number of Years of if Veterans or Fraternal ��// Continuous Existance �f Organization .7 kV a of the Club Number of Years in Number of Club Will the Club be Current Quarters Members7,015 Issued a Lawful Yes ❑ No (;amhlinn I irpncp? CITY OF FARMINGTON THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE LICENSE INDIVIDUAL THERAPIST 1. NAME: L e,(A -S ���'r;S �'� � i� VIiC'Y1e vt LAST FIRST MIDDLE MAIDEN 2. ADDRESS: .$��J9 - /© s+ STREET BOX # (61, ,--n, /647 rY)I J CITY STATE ZIP CODE 3. DATE OF BIRTH: - 4 - 4. EMPLOYER: ADDRESS: STREET BOX # S. ATTACHMENTS: o n. -A le CERTIFICATE OF REQUIRED EDUCATION OTHER 6. ARE YOU PRESENTLY LICENSED IN ANOTHER COMMUNITY? YES NO x IF YES, PLEASE LIST: 7. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN DENIED A MASSAGE LICENSE? YES NOy IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN: 8. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A SEX RELATED OFFENSE? YES NO A/ IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN: 9. LIST ANY RELEVANT TRAINING OR EXPERIENCE: rivl p4 ) e DISCLAIMER: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND COMPLETE AND UNDERSTAND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENTS OR OMISSIONS OF MATERIAL FACTS MAY RESULT IN DISQUALIFICATION OR DENIAL OF LICENSE. (� //-5 0--ed 147 h-c-e-0-6 DATE SIGNATURE tc044.tdon NOTARY:41 �a TITLE .4-"^ ;\ JULIA A. JOHNSON i NOTARY PUBJC—MINNESOTA 1 DAKOTA COUNTY MY CommjM OR&M .Fop.4.1993 CITY OF FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT LICENSE APPLICATION RENEWAL FORM The following application for renewal must be filled out completely and accurately as related to applicant. Any information deleted or misrepresented may result in a denial of the license. 1. NATURE OF LICENSE REQUEST Liquor On Sale _ Liquor Sunday Liquor Off Sale Other (.// 2. BUSINESS NAME: r4-C- —10L, C Y 1 3. HAS CORPORATE STRUCTURE, OWNERSHIP OR MANAGEMENT CHANGED SINCE JANUARY OF THE PRECEDING YEAR? YES NO '?( IF YES, EXPLAIN IN DETAIL ON BACK. 4. HAS OPERATING OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE IN CHARGE OF LICENSED ACTIVITY CHANGED SINCE JANUARY OF PRECEDING YEAR? YES NO"I\ IF YES, EXPLAIN IN DETAIL ON BACK. 5. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN PERSONS OR GROUPS HOLDING FINANCIAL INTERESTS IN BUILDING, BUSINESS, FURNITURE OR STOCK SINCE JANUARY OF PRECEDING YEAR? YES NO IF YES, EXPLAIN IN DETAIL ON BACK. 6. ARE THERE ANY PLANS CURRENTLY PENDING OR ANTICIPATED FOR THE SALE OR TRANSFER OF THE PREMISES OR BUSINESS FOR WHICH LICENSE IS APPLIED? YES NO \ IF YES, EXPLAIN IN DETAIL ON BACK. 7. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL REAL ESTATE TAXES, ASSESSMENTS OR OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMS - OF THE CITY, STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN AID TO DATE. DATE ' _ - Cy SIGNATURE aju„ Y4,7 ePvijA., TITLE 110)2y^ 8. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS RENEWAL APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND COMPLETE AND UNDERSTAND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENTS OR OMISSIONS OF MATERIAL FACTS MAY RESULT IN DISQUALIFICATION OR DENIAL OF LICENSE. DATE //. 3--1/ SIGNATURE lt. TITLE CL e'! Record Checks Reviewed by: Title: Q1,,e-F -: ( /ce Farmington Police Department-: SUSAN J. MILLER Nor ARYF 9UG-MINNESOTA Approved _ R-jecte ^KnT.A COUNTY Cocimiss!on t.pires Nov. 23, 1993 n Subscribed and Sworn to before me Daniel M. Siebenaler, Chief of olice this 1G-1-PN day of `i)da ./y1.elt, 19q/ . Date: //- / 2-q / Notary AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. NAME: Larry Thompson DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: November 5, 1991 MEETING DATE: November 18, 1991 CATEGORY: Petitions, Requests and Communications SUBJECT: Proclaim 11/24 - 11/30 as.Women's Bowling Week EXPLANATION: Self Explanatory REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Proclamation attached. REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Donna McDonough 3215 Lower 147th St. Rosemount • ,,.,,.. Office of the mayor 3ITarmiIuJtLut, mtntrnøta , r 10, t If t a 1. t 0 tt IN RECOGNITION OF THE W1BC 15TH ANNIVERSARY WHEREAS, Bowting -vs the otdeat and most popukan panti.ci.pati.on apont .in .the United States; and WHEREAS, Bowting .us a sport which can be enjoyed by .indiv.idua.ea and bamiti.e4 as a un. t; and WHEREAS, The spent ob bowling a4 an active sport, cowtn.ibutLng to the health ob panti.eipante, white eneating a productive competitive atmosphere; and WHEREAS, The women's IntennatLonat Bowling Congne s pnov.Ldeb the oppontuwity bon be.maLe athtete4 to excel -Ln competition; advance thew ath.LetLc ah liA; and aenve a4 note models bon gin/A and young women; and WHEREAS, The Women's Intecnationat Btowing Congress pnov.ideb women the opportunity to develop leadership shit/A; and WHEREAS, The Women's International BowL4ng Congress 'LA the world's tangent women's 4ponta onganizat.i.on with 2.7 mi L on members; and WHEREAS, The Women's International Bowling Congne4a wiet cetebnate .its 75th annivenaany November 28, 1991. NOW THEREFORE, I, EUGENE "BABE" KUCHERA, Mayon. o4 the City ob Fanmi.ngton, Mi.nneeota, do he.ieby proclaim the week ob Novembeh. 24th through November 30th, 1991 as "WOMEN'S BOWLING WEEK" and extend eongnatatation4 to at women who, by membenohip in the Women'4 InteAnationat Bowling Congne44, enjoy the 4pont ob bowling. Litz wan. rv4tteof .0 1avt Izttunto sit my /and and caused t/is seat to Gt affixed. ATTEST: DATE. Novembee 1E. 1991 Q COPYRI ONT 1987 • MODERN PRI NTI NO CO., B.HAM., AL. w - 4 AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. XL NAME: Wayne Henneke DEPARTMENT: Finance DATE: November 7, 1991 MEETING DATE: November 18, 1991 CATEGORY: Unfinished Business SUBJECT: 1992 Budget - Schedule Work Sessions EXPLANATION: See attached memo. REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo - Wayne Henneke REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Department Heads W SIGNATuR Memo to: Mayor & Council Date November 14, 1991 Re 1992 Proposed Budget Staff is currently working updating the requested C. I .P. and implementing the concerns the Council had in the 1992 proposed operating budget from the last budget meeting. December 2 , 1991 is the Truth in Taxation hearing. It can be continued until December 16, 1991 if there is a need. The Minnesota Taxpayers Association is circulating a booklet about property taxes as part of an effort to "inform and motivate taxpayers" . A copy of this booklet is attached for your review along with a League of Minnesota Cities article reviewing the booklet. It is very important that Council and Staff become familiar with the booklet because it provides a lot of information that will have a strong influence on citizens who receive it. The City received reports from Dakota County which compare Dakota County cities ' and townships ' taxable value and 1992 proposed tax capacity rates . Farmington ' s proposed tax capacity rate is calculated by the County to increase 12 . 87% . Considering the reduction in local government aids and levy authority, the 12 .87% increase is reasonable. One must remember, expenditures from 1991 to the 1992 Proposed Budget only increased approximately 2% . In comparing Farmington' s increase in the tax capacity rate with other cities, the increase is in line. Copies of the County' s reports are attached for your review. With the truth in taxation hearing scheduled for December 2, 1991, we must establish a budget workshop. I will be attending the meeting to review this with you. LUO, z' , " Wayne E. Henneke Finance Director c.c. Larry Thompson, City Administrator Department Heads file is to 4 W X 45 2 rr Lil � O 0, 0 O 5 .0 it 5 04 y cu i! cin � La — Oa ^wl C 1 MO p �,� C, 0 p C 0 y 0. cp .0 4., L .0 •t syC � s >; , 1 p © Fat o3wo ,,i .0 aao EO a� 0S u sL c uia0 I c• v •� .0 —� 0. 2 a,,,, 0 �' fja�t O to Y U X4.i1 ^ , , Ed . t = r.l .1_• .. > •_ 0 cA a0 X it 0 N OO .rX . &) p , to lubLI V CT = te r. � T► 7 = . V .: r .69N cn r" 70 °' ° wi • j*Auga, fl a 14 g � o. . , ; 0.‘C7\ ..IC = 60 A 444 .0 0 .0E.4 6.. t to = p O p :4: 173 0 p p '0 pa Er O 0 a : ,O7a C13 : ?s "i" Ci > .0 Li C0 1.3 .22 (7 u o, a a. O E .3 > C tJc F .O 2 ),,w o m 0 E' Q o a „ M 8 m V 4E . r b 3 u u vi >-' 3 e m W ' V pc >0 ' 0 x EZ :D F E %.7: F in F5 y 5U O . u C C •C .. e O •e 2 g w 2 4 vi C • •• .°r O t. co C •C Ir iQ o `0 5 _ i� V�j Er O C o -4 T o C O O = o T *0 ° O O p w �'' @ y w.' 7 a� • ..t N N M.3 O w O l - O O p 0 0 •Y OI .. 0 .- O O 'L^i 6 C L' 'r 67 N C C vvE « w = es i . 00 w cN E .r. C a4 wag 04.. •x„ Vyj fix{ Q C ° p > 0 9 . ..°. 3 O O O g w O C o2 > "O G ' = yy .J pa T m : F. = a o 'o E• ; a$ o C 4 ° O •w •o , 0 04 .Z.i, - cu L tC i' y t G ° s% `. p o M « 1•« t• a o w e 3 K o o w c h' 0 y 7 v a X en o •.O «a . e w o « ao « O o ° o O l 0_4'1 C OD v G. y E 0 i./ m o v 0 .- ° > 3 0 0 ° a.o o-~ w C o O" 0 "O L fy L > ,..6 0 I- 7 .0 « q `o ; « o _ oo s a0roe ow b L C 7 Cal t.), v �' ° > o ... O of t � is O 4 O CL O h tr 4r N id p ° ° CD c a c c . w E '• w E S ° •e ° 0 o L o o .4 00 'a•• we L 7 G C a E c • rA > U. $ 9oa0w .; aoao0 ; >• o ° c a« .. C � •� 7 0 � ed C C O M w O N 'C -•--It:-:: w 7. M ° ti O 'O r •O p C o O • O .p V O O « V Cl? O +"� ra i. y f.t r.' co O . w �, o « e. •« « w e e o e o o` c « E w n 3 •g y 'V ed eC ° "O .: `;"7 :,: ,eCro = oi eaoa 3 cco °e oma : ` r a; � 3H aai s F « c « w « w Fw > wEo >= 3is22 Noo o °� 5 u i Iy : o .. o o y�j ` ,a ++ r O v `� eV o r , •o . in « O e p OQ 67 V 0 "' •3 6 CL y VI"7 ' N .. co 0 3 « O. •O .p`r � C C « o E I; .4 y O •.y. 0 7 y o r, y cO n. 3 E .4 7 'C .3 0 4 y "O 6� rn "C 1"" 9..... ° G O c o o ° o .- ° a c. o N '13, p flu 7 i'' v� C : H e .°. T a o 0 0 o O. a oa .e ° .°o Ki g el E 3 oc ewo ; cI° w o`a a.Ec0o ,�� a) ."' E C .. c++s ,, tlf. r i w 0 w = ° « r r 'O 3 c — I~ •O "C .,., 4 E t. y ,fl L « p 0 0 ° ' a•S ° 0 ?� w o w �; 3 3 V C a. c v :: w « •°0 .3 c y° o c a� ° o r 0 ,. . 0 0 9 x 0 0 0 ... X� O 6a •_ Q qo 3qo _ ; Nra .. O . ; eo.ac � C G.x Zy y' v4t O. v1 t w o f u o « N o r °p, s 0 o v o 3 °oa S3 « xwcWo 3e 3 " xdc , Oo a eV r w e9 « O.- ei .0 O ID w c0 p 7 .. a O d 44 ° ^ el O .1.6 � w .0 "17 = 3 CLO a0.. .fl L. a, 1.. I O "O isco •ja Cd ..+ .L. 3 a "'n VVi y 7 f°„ �•4. O :.+ �" CL .�. r 'i .L .r� z,• 000.'_.' ani e� ° I i,`' d t. a) C `� w y0 O .gyp ti+ Cr"O CL"' .d C ., ++ C "' Z O i as "C 7, = CL �u CL t. cu0 D., $• .§ r Et O aJ yX .0 7 H .7'i w C "0 lw y o V .0 eu y' 1-, LLi33 0[y _ n i, $ y ar `� ° e e,.a w o a eat "C7 O i 4J it 'L, �" L L ' GOJ 3 = 7 O " L .°+ ,� . ., 60l a. w 00 a''y v "O y O. C a. CL`+ 5 O ea y°, L .'Or V y� �'C C' "p "O GO 7, .fir t.+' O 75. 3 ' O 6. IE 3 •C 01 as •C — 7 >, d CO •,C _ .+ "O cd O O 7 O b0 i L © CD WI C y o aLi 'C �'A't7 ba 0 = `� .o •E•b s CO " 6.. u I. Z a� C' d 41 O e,....� C .0 u o '' WI "O O w+ O u ° 0 0. .° u N o 0 a •c. c .. i, o e51 o .6" 1 V a, 3 "SI o_ 'O o c Co c c - o°`. C E _ 600 Es c aal _CI ° •° ys 7 et �+ "E " ,c ° w e° ",.41 ...t. ao�d e o v, v 3 Et4 0, .+ v .a o •g ,, � E c 00 a, C F •� 3F' •� ''.e •>, o .a •a °i,°' E '= ..- 0. $ P,u .c° ;° ac' u - c e v ° .__ aoc � : . •-, : °' t, o � ° c ; E ' oz 0 16 i >, 0. E 's ` Q .4 4 'O t 17 O .0 ° .c n Z 0 v •_ .0 e°i y w C c. era d 3 04 c 0I = [= V a) 0,4 3 .a o cid g •p 'fl O..r..•' r 4" ` 'L7 0 _ v 7 S y a' c C .c w o v a� 3 C = F cg .r; u , .5 a 0 g« . ';• g 0 =.+., 2.4. -is of a' ='u 111 N = d72. E0op o00a3 Q, S '.'� O7 �+ yisi+ •d aG"� N O m .� O r Cd0 sOe0 r rE O p� d O IQ N r ; • c y 'O O O �' 7 a� •� p� Ca 1t r O O O ..f g C O O Of i." 0D C C 0.9 , i. 7 r C 0J R O. E E .4 ' y ... E a « o c y E o `qy S .C! :: ouSw > c >, a 3w ,.., c 4 3 E S2 c O .0 t 07 « � t n ,,, O � c0 3 O CU a, kl 1 es o c c o «oc o : o ` C a�1 p at= pa •." 6) Ew t7 a« o zo o �, ,� E ., am a°, o • 0 07 IN H wflI C., r► t > m cC t , O O iO G;O E y« 0. Hi hi3 ]:::::=: � a sud= L 6)S . b ).,. d0ro jiitq C'e . a b ioEN70 iff .c C Q • oO, > e• = Cdi t+ .+ u a 04 y p 4) 1 mi • ' o msea a « aa)yOco by c sYNo oEo •;c'►; N p E L ra �.L `' OSOa a, w 3 < ` CO) i E+ eE i CA 3 e 0 ,« x « c c°C « van d d' V y r C > O e0 i•• C « ac L > ; M os A c ,, ani .� a za :::::::::0::-H: C W o w c a o 0 0 « y^ i� a". ?� e•. p„ O y >' E acu es ni i-:=:'. O o a c x 7 5 t ,N mow, 5 - p O .0 co m• ea mcdE mo aoi w = oV ` a .+ p, 61 L o .� 0) y G v « _ a m v i L c 7 i CC O O E az p p L ::,:.:0.:.::: _ 0) l o o v o> 0 '• = o L O. v 6. ct�• t o i' 0 ^ O la. C' y O C C_ O W V C ap C f. Ol V L L 6 .r 'C w .0 L 6J D.. i•. Q _ >.. .O >.C •.• 19 ICSi! tiff >. G ... C CL=il, rO- .CC.' 3, GJ ed CES co 2 ° d0 6 40 74 N c v t n c yn L .a C o .., C p• E t0:: LL roc = pf° a � = o 'a� � y y o ea '� if a •o L E 3 > • 3 • L m 7 C 3 I' i d E °° h ..• C O. O os 4-. � � x � > le- o. - 2. c... o :ti a. o e`e E r v �t at i, o .1 i. L `�- L ` a t .O. > o r it a� 'O �+ O .+ O G 'r+ O F- « F- E > Fv E — ,, . O, 0, L E " O ifL C C p 0 e� " a a, E . a 6 c .o4', 10 « t es .1 c c O se o s a,o D as C O o C N r c m c o II . '� w E 7 'co cc r .r= , co • ft, 0 O > C• 'n aJ erO >` r 7 O d• ' v c° � aaa G. ° .. 4. •v `— L .0.0 a, W0. ti• Ow' 5ai t fr C VyOiUO .0 E L iI is .p. L.hCC s., to Q . ° a nal y n 0. '^ ou '' O s aV Z +- y O > '. cs 13 C •• V . O N d V .. .0 ... OVI V f 0 ►.,C r 0 C • r a. W 2. •- 7 i r °w N w ° Pi E °w 6 .1 d cy m a, C N .c_ 3 c 8 C a, .+oma;= « x o c — N _ YI.- N - m U `15 C/ w .QH 0 pUw ,_ m .:aizc >a .2 A y C. . •47 L N C • . = om . � M ° •c � ° c aQ O s > ; EW X m mWco • .r 0 O M EN .s� • U Y erLyo > O a O tL EV 40 m a . m N Oaay O .cX u y r. ,> ,. y0OL co _ ` G am r .O , a, a, i sm O ... .a. CI 2 a o 45 o m ++ "C exuN E a x 0 0, " o c a y m y • a r. O 6 4 CU m ` rN vu a,H y; . t •coo> >« m Um a a" 3 m L 7 cc.„' mc as y ..m i+ « N .� r W O = mo « " p ° mc c 2 a -c O ^c b.. oo cc , y ° m m « . C +c ., : u. ° Wm0c �+ E4OyryEo �. E �; U O '- . N NN ` YN O .0W+` trr. =•• aU Oo U m NNmmN a ,m ` L 0 G ° w0 • O — mma ° .. m .0 .cmc 0 >. .8000 .- " pr • O j .cm m m 0 O co •ME�u. t �O « TO « C > U co 0.LU E L . 0 mm I tm = C Y C4iii HI il Ey m w W C w O o E= W o A 0 iro m = a' v. .+ .. a ° wo sO Em mo m £ 0Ei . .0aom W >45 .2 0c '. y3— m « �. $ 'OuaO� , - w 'c T > > m E o p 75. al #. „o > Q aETmcpya, m . N• % o ° o ov ,, ay .0yO a •w ti. y E m m ., m yN O > .. w+ y a, O to O o -0 12, y0 - N � •uOc a, c „ft m 2 ,A...,:.. m 0 y a a) > m E O. < E m ca C iLL„ C° c m r. m Nm m N V6L Y m ., Of ._ om ; U ,, E m C •b w e. 3 E a E• n m 4, oti « � m Qm r m N > Nc m m O C O . O co O L d .E w L N m .N m 0 a 44 a' O .O o. c N .0 ac, ac, ea 'v c a, w a, o L t • Qc _offv = ' c. eo 2• o � M M • a � ; _ , ° s >' � e° o ca, _ Ee° gL ° 3 • � 6oao • ,.4 r = � 0 auu uooc Q 7 ccC'c , a, ai o aeo • ^� . " voa = c d ° . © E •u ;oy ea eRcac .. aZO _ s • aZ o o.2L y II , y.g V L y .° vad .. e� C v 8 .c , a a L e. C, c O 60, e L C O y CL �, Ti c 6J e. L. M 0) O O b0 L O O O a Q'- C O e7 r. O ly L "E u r.. a 6, .r.. L O a 2. 01-' ..r., • GO co w s ` s a ° o. a c a..o o ° ° c.tw c a>, t. :14 5 CO °� a, ON a .SC i e L ..4:1) °n a a, e� > ee ea .. ea a'', c o D . •6 y ea c ,o o '' e`o o a, ao c c >,3' 6 a eG a`, z o o >, •a o c o a C W f.., CQ L Li L �+ 6, .° •VJ L L u O .. CC < u •v a • f a I. T� E � •= a „ 3 0 - ark a s. O a.. y •b,0 O o L L ^ ..T'+ c y O .+ O c y �_ 5 - ae a� .�c°2 o ow c sac. '1. a' v o o L •E c o a, c 1" c V) � � at� a v a 0 • o. a T. a•mt CO cp C. y °u c " r a. 1 Lel tot n 1. a3 _a a, .m.. O a''� y u .,r G u `� O -. 0 67 .. .7 +.. .� eS 0 e0 D �' �' L •es .5 u ° c.a V, W a e7 o U a o II •.. 0 as D+ CD u ° F c. o o w .° m c cco_ d d CO 0 IV � r P , e.e. 2. E Ci,0 0 0, O G. .J' I 3 2 . i t 0 0.... rt c °s u ^°, p y I- aJ '� 4+ 6� u "' ,� C as.>. o ` $ � o +� C u s u °a c 1 o ° _ .3 01; o a oy a1 a,.r3 E a O a, ie ,p�"CIS CU O V d0 e C .0 0. eC C 0O O C e .i F ,Cp , - r.+ S C C :. .r O a' C I.5. r H 0 -- ac OWdat C (il •C a V. C ,nj O i, •0 � re g E w .6y dr.,yaw ° ueao • o � a ,� s I v w o 0. k aci Mt &cD D+ e°c© 0 °S A Oq 4 R. a°, O °a,r CO E 4 —. L a, as0 ° y y .0 r °r C c is ,.., ig 1 c. 1 0 L 4. dive 6v "C v4r wVO V0 • i. LCW is Oa y O. O 0 0 -a e 026 2 aol0 0 3 Z ' ° Aa °off 93 L ~ aZ may. t .... 47 i�' "+� 4 0 Q..co at C uo es -i, '°� t i V y fre 03) �r �' 'i1 C • pip��,, ',�1 V ° O o • c i E •°CL u � as ;. ; G. o 6 +_+ ig v o C. `y .i tie . E a1 l ��'„ _ 0e0 . 0 _ _ a - D 6 a� ° — $ ° 3 � v 0 � a c _.. GI* CI baoa 2 c v au 0 co2 0.. 4.0 -' a $ .0 Cru C L pe a, O a) L0. @ y 0 > t >' L ° Z O � — p L r.. � s 'O . O ^ O rE O co p aCs, E ` O y m o � E .a 2 a, y iy C ° Q u a a C COX o o, C - a ' Y . .3 ° IP ° 8 o aa .cOL w8 . aO � or cual g, i F 3 4,_21 gi F i •E � c a °, ,i °u .s g s E. -2 o r.S 3 E E-'+ . s m C c f a C_, Table 1: 1989 Composition of Revenue for Cities and Counties in Minnesota - Percentages City Size-Population Revenue Source 2,500 5,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 100,000 o All Under to to to to to and Cities 2,500 5,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 100,000 Over m Property Taxes and TIF 23.1% 21.4% 27.0% 27.2% 27.5% 34.0% 27.4%. 30.8% m Taxes Other Than Property 0.2i 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.0 1.0 10.4 4,4 - Special A ments 5.0 4.5 5.7 7.7 7.3 8.8 3.2 3.2 x Licenses and Permits 2.1 2.0 1.8 3.1 2.3 3.1 2.0 1.8 ro Federal Aid 6.3 7.3 5.0 4.0 1.6 0,9 5:1 8.8 0 State.Aid at Credits 40.1 41.9 37.5 36.4 37.1 25.9 23 9 30.1 13 Transfers From Other Local Governments 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.5 co User Fees and Fines 6.3 6.1 6.2 6.6 6.8 8.0 6.1 7.5 °o Misc,and Interest 15:6% 15.7% :15.7%: 13:6% 15.3% 17.1% 20.7% 11.9%`: co Total Per Capita Revenues $456.82 $436.51 $507.31 $523.22 $539.93 $539.05 $715.52 $::1033.98: g Number of Cities This Size 854 674 70 39 34 31 4 2 Revenue Source Counties Twin Cities Metro Counties Other Metro Counties Non-Metro Counties Property Taxes 39.0% 35.3% 26.7% Special Assessments 0.3 0.5 1.9 Licenses and Permits 0.6 0.3 0.2 State Aids and Credits 27.3 31.7 43.4 Federal Aid 13.5 15.3 12.6 II Transfers From Other Local Governments 1.0 : 0.1 0.3 User Fees and Fines 9.5 9.1 7.3 Misc.and Interest 8.8% 7.7% 7.5% Total Per Capita Revenues $511.75 $519.95 $719,99 Number of Counties in This Group 10 6 71 Source: Minnesota State Auditor Financial Data and MTA calculations. Table 2: Average 1989 Per Capita Expenditures (excluding capital outlays) for the Largest 110 Cities in Minnesota, by Size of Population Housing and General Health and Street Culture and Economic Total Current City Government Public Safety Maintenance Recreation Development Misc. Expenditures Avg-All Cities.(854 cities) $67.24 $66.57 $59.26';. $20.64 $1.2,66 $55.28 ::$281.66:: Avg.< 2500(6:74 cities) 68.53 57.28 59.74 15.46 12.23 49.05. 262:29' Avg.2500-5000(70 cities) 65.95 86.18 61.68 30.91 :' 8.51 77,56. 330,79:': Cities with population of 5,000 to 10,000(39 cities) Average 61.94 99.14: 57.08. 4018: ::: I:.. 18.00 73.77 : 35010;;1. ALEXANDRIA 74.08 136.29 57.47 51.93 6.29 17.01 343.07 ARDEN HILLS 41.50 73.78 27.53 26.93 0.00 12.90 182.63 BUFFALO 49.62 84.61 28.79 24.16 173.88 112.50 473.56 CHANHASSEN 93.60 95.91 66.64 31.87 28.82 388.48 705.32 CHISHOLM 68.58 184.12 114.76. 52.43 54.85 72.56 547.29 CROOKSTON 61.53 126.28: `< 60,98 131.63 ; 48.05 20.61 449.08 3 DETROIT LAKES 54:09 106.58. 87,08' 59.41 13,81 84:91 405.89 5 EAST BETHEL 27.80 21.12 22,78:1 2.97 0.00 37.44 112.11;!' o 4,3 EAST GRAND FORKS :': 55.19 193.51;: 76.55<I 95,86 135.02 122.47 678.60. o ELK RIVER 44.94 103.73;! 42.82! 16.36 29.14 59.44 296.43:: m FALCON HEIGHTS 54.64 68.95 32.58 11.22 0.00 87.68 255.07 o FARMINGTON 89.71 72.55 77.77 45.98 28.62 78.20 392.83 o o FOREST LAKE 34.06 138.44 42.37 34.94 0.00 88.63 338.43 0 GRAND RAPIDS 106.82 88.43 94.82 106.63 6.61 82.32 485.63 B HAM LAKE 29.24 32.06 23.68 0.00 1.71 24.16 110.84 y HERMANTOWN! 40.02 76.82: 23.35' 6.04 0.00 44.43 190.66< o INTERNATIONAL FALLS 85.90 145.73 124.33 33.40 :' 1.51 88.63 479.49:.. n LAKE:'ELMO 56:92 34.05 28.64: 7.07 0.00 5.67 132.35< ,.; LINO LAKES 85.83 87.02 47.10 17.72 : 2.86 48.67 289.20< o LITCHFIELD 64.53 92.55 6539' 57,33 0.00 39.87 320,06: Table 2 cont. Housing and General Health and Street Culture and Economic Total Current ` City Government Public Safety Maintenance Recreation Development Misc. Expenditures LITTLE CANADA $34.83 $60.02 $18.42 $15.62 $2.16 $61.08 $192.12 LITTLE FALLS 50.97 110.76 59.14 26.57 21.64 54.24 323.31 5 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 56.61 114.76 49.03 11.20 0.00 111.49 343.10 m MONTEVIDEO 47.13 93.12 65.21 42.15 0.00 86.74 334.35 0 MORRIS 53.94 92.13 76.02 39.58 32.70 57.11 351.49 cii MOUND.: $6.60 89.86- 59.29 20.13 T:60 69.99 298.46: m ORONO 90.06 126.81 67.92 4.53 0.0028.39 317:70' i REDWOOD FALLS 60.37 92.78 68.67 76.87 67.67 :..;.,.:..1.20-:,..:70.:::q ..:: ::3.87.:4 :2 m ROSEMOUNT 112:43 88.70 ` 76.49 47.17 6:45 119.38 450:61 N SAUK:RAPIDS 41.22 63.55 61.58 12.28 12.30 '.;-.::..:78:54.-....'.::::',-:::: :::-:::169.-A7'.:1 D SAVAGE 85.56 99.85 41.57 18.55 0.00 119.36 364.88 y SHOREWOOD 115.20 102.06 56.72 17.61 0.00 49.69 341.29 °0 SPRING LAKE PARK 49.89 88.29 18.55 38.37 0.00 21.95 217.05 m ST. ANTHONY 52.89 127.44 39.41 3.28 1.72 25.41 250.16 5 ST. PETER 59.60 73.99 67.37 63.34 13.89 27.33 305.53 THIEF RIVER FALLS:' 63.49 114.00: 5a;.7.1:-.-:. 120.06 5.11 99.55. 461..91 :VADNAIS HEIGHTS - 49.60 55.32 23.48: 11.15 0.00 : 133.69' 273:25. VIRGINIA 72:98 247.31 -105.1-8:H-Eh:::::::-':-....135..62 :: 4:67 163.22 ::728 97; WASECA 43'.72 63.06' 66-.35.:-...---..i'..:-''......>48.97 0.00 32:4S-1::-.:::::::,:':':::...,254$3,':•,':•: Cities with population of 10,000 to 20,000(34 cities) :Average;. 60:84 110.78 57.24 -,'.--::::::---:.52:.:23,--..:-.'-::::::..:' :::1-5..87.,---.::... .. 79'.41..--.,:.:--..-.:-:::::-..::'-376....37 ALBERT LEA 46.89 172.13 60.34 80.96 13.68 39.82 413.82 ANDOVER 44.79 51.17 21.93 13.31 3.48 139.10 273.78 ANOKA 61.72 114.15 52.98 71.32 4.24 39.52 343.93 BEMIDJI 63.07 130.38 69.03 40.13 7.44 48.96 359.01 BRAINERD 140.09 138.44 48.71 32.16 1.19 34.60 395.20 Table 2 cont. Housing and General Health and Street Culture and Economic Total Current City Government Public Safety Maintenance Recreation Development Misc. Expenditures CHAMPLIN $60.20 $82.91 $51.48 $42.91 $4.91 $149.89 $392.30 CHASKA 81.58 73.32 48.03 28.37 97.75 310.60 639.86 CLOQUET 56.86 156.49 100.17 58.05 4.77 36.69 413.03 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 54.07 117.77 38.13 85.51 34.22 90.94 420.84 FAIRMONT 50.39 87.41 58.85 78.00 9.28 71.39 353.32 164:73 66.22 553 97 :: 30 1+i ;:::::<; .> . ::::>:<:;: PARIBAULT ;; 35:46 $12f$ 43179' FERGUS.FALLS 85:53 92.83 61.$8 ' 85 67 :::40 76 69 62 435 87 HASTINGS 631 11.3:27 50:34 3449 0 17 4504 307 116::: HIBBING 53:01 :. 205.56 6596 57 22. 15 12 109 61 50648''. HOPKINS 75:52. 148.:03 74:32 i 30 Q6.. :;. ::81.04 590.-Si.. ........ 966+k:, HUTCHINSON 60.19 111.54 67.85 99.78 46.89 129.94 516.19 MARSHALL 86.48 100.82 91.35 122.09 21.05 61.41 483.20 MOUNDS VIEW 68.99 70.23 21.32 30.21 0.00 48.19 238.94 NEW ULM 69.24 85.62 77.00 80.88 21.48 66.82 401.03 co 3 NORTH MANKATO 52.45 62.04 87.27 49.06 0.40 70.09 321.31>: o NORTH ST PAUL 21 36 74.54 35.67 2124; 000 25;03 183,84 co NORTHFIELf1 51.:16 86.87 52 94 44 95 000 10'199 337.44: -i OAKDALE. 58;92 79.54 26:39, :,20.98 , A,00. 106:49 392 32 x OWATONNA 29:69 84;86 67 04 87 68 : 2 56 63.86 335 42: m PRIOR:LAKE ••'".•• 69.>85 90:45 45:45:•• 41 84: 4.42 ; 103.33.... .:. 355,35.; RWING SEY 68.19 48.68 18.66 14.09 2.15 41.40 193.17 w REDED WIN64.13 224.78 100.85 64.20 71.51 69.63 595.09 m ROBBINSDALE 83.27 116.59 50.19 65.31 35.77 34.60 385.73 o SHAKOPEE 71.06 112.93 62.01 43.85 3.05 93.40 386.28 m STILLWATER 46.46 116.97 56.36 48.39 0.00 76.06 344.23 c °' WEST.ST.PALiL 37.80 144>33 63.8.0 26.34: ::0 73 ; 32 22 305.2:1;;: WILLMAR 55.94 105:51 53�r43 59 34 10 19 8300 36843 WOOOBURY`> 42.97 91:80 4497 26x4 , 1 94 91�4�4 299.46: WORTHINGTON 56:24. 109.90 57.72 . 3102:; ;4135 .:. .. ..7:516 371:!46.. . - Table 2 cont. Housing and ,. General Health and Street Culture and Economic Total Current City Government Public Safety Maintenance Recreation Development Misc. Expenditures -. Cities with population of 20,000 to 50,000(31 cities) a Average $54.46 $109.59 $46.83 $40.73 $11.86 $79.33. $342.80 5 APPLE VALLEY 48.05 90.73 51.74 38.75 0.00 69.66 298.93 e AUSTIN 32.32 168.00 90.73 63.29 11.81 33.18 399.33 m BLAINE 39.10 66.39 25.57 24.26 21.14 67.32 243.78 -I BROOKLYN CENTER 56.30 105.00 55.13 59.50 25.03 35.83 336.79 x BURNSVILLE 51.74 136.23 37.88 34.07 0.00 144.91 404.83 m COON RAPIDS 57.06 104.73 32.78 31.21 6.31 8.1,62 313.71 COTTAGE GROVE 52.20 117,24 29.15 45.43 2.26 38.95 285.23 e CRYSTAL 40.06 88.87 32.83 36.50. ..5.97 71.06 275.29< D m EAGAN 104.24 81.45 26.82 33.07:' 0.00 88.79 334.33' c EDEN PRAIRIE 86.29 90.76 50.46 60.47 >3.27 193.72 48497< m. EDINA 39.03 116.08 55.14 34.97 19.79 73.51 338.52 c FRIDLEY 76.09 103.30 61.50 21.42 16.11 52.53 330.95 m GOLDEN VALLEY 149.46 104.68 97.21 39.83 9.66 89.77 490.61 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 62.13 98.58 41.54 28.74 0.00 80.23 311.23 LAKEVILLE 64.38 109.92 45.36 31.59 0.00 92.62 343.87 MANKATO 16.87 159.88 84.97 54.17 23.21 59:81 398.90:': MAPLE GROVE 38:26 57.33 41.27 33.07 16.79 111.47 298.20.:: MAPLEW000'' 46.37 133.44 51.74 32.95 16.73 55.35 336.58::. MINNETONKA 78.38 94.1:'.1 34.91 41.47; 0.47 103:31 352.64`: MOORHEAD 48.50 119:57 58.17 48.20:: 27.12 6.5.43 366:99:; NEW BRIGHTON 39.87 58.28 28.27 36.49 13.81 106.65 283.36 NEW HOPE 47.29 116.17 26.10 35.71 9.42 82.94 317.63 PLYMOUTH 45.96 71.93 41.19 36.43 10.93 97.82 304.26 RICHFIELD 51.36 141.40 30.69 66.05 40.48 71.62 401.59 ROSEVILLE 31.94 73.97 33.80 33.74 15.34 112.36 301.16 Table 2 cont. Housing and General Health and Street Culture and Economic Total Current City Government Public Safety Maintenance Recreation Development Misc. Expenditures SHOREVIEW $29.76 $42.30 $45.63 $35.07 $11.30 $50.10 $214.16 SOUTH ST. PAUL 46.42 174.21 51.50 49.05 2.72 50.85 374.75 ST.CLOUD 52.99 155.53 54.45 46.81 10.92 153.00 473.70 ST. LOUIS PARK 53.60 144.76 43.73 44.54 4.65 42.15 333.43 WHITE BEAR LAKE 46.88 80.00 29.76 12.44 15.30 33.41 217.79 WINONA 55.48 192.37 61.68 73.31 27.27 49.14 459.27 Cities with population of 50,000 to 100,000(4 cities) Average 67:27 .. 148.18' 63.73 58.15 40.49 108.50. 486.27 BLOOMINGTON 88.05 120.89 47.25 36.87 38.25 210.43 541.74 BROOKLYN PARK 54.17 83.50 45.87 38.10 7.64 32.11 261.40 DULUTH 90.89 195.89 97.36 51.31 93.85 137.49 666.80 ROCHESTER 35.78 192.44 64.42 106.33 22.23 53.95 475.15 Cities with population of 100,000 and Over(2 cities) 3 al Average. 88.36 296.25 74.87 100.50::: 101J0 125.48 787.16 c Minneapolis 120.72 338.57 83.29 118.97 75.62 116.50 853.67 m Saint Paul 56.00 253.92 66.45 82.04 127.78 134.45 720.64 m Source:State Auditor Financial Data and MTA calculations. Table based on 1988 populations. m m m D w o 0 0 o • ^. N 0 Table 2 cont. Notes on Table 2 1. Spending data shown vary for many reasons,most notably due to differences in"workload factors";that is,local conditions such as crime rates,poverty levels, etc. A complete analysis of variations in spending from one community to another must 3 °' take these factors into account. 5 m 0 2. Definition of Spending Categories: m General Government: Mayor and city council;administration and finance; and other general government(city hall,elections,etc.) v Health and Public Safety: Police and ambulance;fire department; other protection;various sanitation expenditures(pest control, CO street cleaning);and health m Street Maintenance and Repair:Street maintenance and storm sewers;snow removal; street engineering;and street lighting D Culture and Recreation: Libraries;parks and recreation m Housing and Economic Development: Urban redevelopment, housing, and economic development 00 Miscellaneous:Interest and fiscal charges;unallocated pension contributions; unallocated insurance and judgments, and other m expenditures not listed separately or specifically included. z Total Current Expenditures: The sum of all listed above. 3. Garbage collection was not listed separately nor included in the totals because most cities have an enterprise fund with separate accounting for this service. Airports were not listed separately nor included in the totals because so few cities have them. The urban redevelopment, housing, and economic development category does not include expenditures made land reported)separately through Housing and Redevelopment Authorities. 4. All capital outlay expenditures are excluded from these tables,because of the sporadic nature of these expenditures over time and across cities. The Health and Public Safety and Total Current Expenditures categories have been adjusted downward for cities which provide police and fire protection for other cities. Their expenses are higher because they provide services to other communities. The amount reported as income from police and fire contracts was subtracted from their police and fire expenditures to compensate for this. Table 3: 1989 Per Capita Expenditures (Excluding Capital Outlays) For The 87 Minnesota Counties Twin Cities Metropolitan Counties General Health and Culture,Rec., Misc. Total Current COUNTY Government Public Safety Highways Public Welfare Environment Expenditures Expenditures Average: $81.19 j $89.47 $29.59 $206:47 $1973 $20:22 8446 66,' ANOKA 70.17 76.48 . 18.24 159.64 28.51 19.30 372.34 CARVER 98.44 86.87 35.88 166.55 21.97 4.90 414.62 CHISAGO 81.15 114.70 59.17 179.29 13.99 61.53 509.83 DAKOTA 90.80 36.02 10.10 156.94 19.01 17.44 330.30 HENNEPIN 45.33 119.08 20.85 370.48 17.42 9.66 582.82 1SANTE 77.31 90.64 39.87: 235.62 ....Al 45 32 35 487 24 RAMSEY 79.24 101.44 18:14 362.24 20;99 8.60 590.64. SCOTT 110.07 111.76: 34:14 129.58 22.38 2126 42919.: WASHINGTON 104.56 86.64 26.15 143.00 22.22. -• '161 1 398 67 WRIGHT .54.79 71.06 33:39 161.35 19.33 11.02 -::::?.:..350:94.> 5 Other Metropolitan Counties 7 0 Average:: .67.83 69.48 41..91 244.36 14.88 13.26 451.72.; o BENTON 57.33 58.05 42.44 189.20 11.85 3.29 362.16 07 CLAY 58.95 43.75 42.68 306.35 9.24 15.13 476.11 x OLMSTED 84.70 82.41 28.07 210.25 16.97 7.85 430.27 logo SHERBURNE 77.68 77.51 20.66 166.52 13.95 13.61 369.93 0 ST. LOUIS 82.18 89.90 86.04 435.43 22.74 5.03 721.32 a STEARNS 46.16 65.24 31.53 158.38 14.55 34.67 350.53 450 ....• m V O 7 Table 3 cont. General Health and Culture,Rec., Misc. Total Current COUNTY Government Public Safety Highways Public Welfare Environment Expenditures Expenditures Non-Metro Counties Average $96.69> $79.91 $105.82 $230.01 $32.99 $23.85 $569.27 5 m 'AITKIN 132.11 135.93 116.21 313.86 68.89 61.52 828.51 y BECKER 85.33 76.36 59.90 322.85 33.27 24.63 602.34 ° m. BELTRAMI 115.57 74.99 54.00 453.87 30.59 27.43 756.45 WII BIG STONE 118.73 66.50 137.07 215.78 42.01 33.62 613.70iic BLUE EARTH 71.67 49.88 32.93 218.44 17.26 13.18 403.37 < BROWN 76.67 54:93 102.47 176:50 31:27 3.84 445,67 m CARLTON 112.51 104.03 87-55 320.18 14.57 8.51 647.35 y CASS 181.63 156.69 ; 133.09 416.15 61.38 11.09 960.03;; o CHIPPEWA 120.89 ;63.44 78.89 266.31 59.75' 24,26 613.54• 2. CLEARWATER 113.45 , 91.05 138.41 449.16 107.19 13.25 912.51 c• COOK 298.55 261.61 284.53 257.82 50.71 66.95 1220.20 COTTONWOOD 87.62 46.90 100.51 219.29 35.12 12.68 502.11 CROW WING 101.45 82.76 59.51 323.41 18.76 10.84 596.73 DODGE 85.16 79.97 82.33 137.95 14.92 18.82 419.15 DOUGLAS 73.40 57.47 62.17 223.73 24.21 23.09 464.06 FARIBAULT 82.68 ;53.55 '1 95:25 62:64 33.99 46;31 374.42;' FILLMORE 80.65 75.77 'I 105.30 147.92' 22:90 32:66 465.20': FREEBORN 74.82 64.71 50.62 228,61 21:02 13.67 453.45 GOODHUE 105.75>' 10838 35.69 184.01 12.97 1.58' 448.39;; GRANT 120.53. 92.36 '' 160.87, 198.52 29.98 26.06 628.32:<. HOUSTON 73.33 84.48 74.58 155.80 14.23 7.03 409.45 HUBBARD 89.30 60.45 93.34 319.12 43.89 16.85 622.94 ITASCA 98.24 128.11 178.55 387.94 30.33 44.30 867.49 JACKSON 81.94 65.46 116.73 261.79 47.81 24.21 597.94 KANABEC 86.27 80.76 93.39 230.62 13.66 15.00 519.70 Table 3 cont. General Health and Culture,Rec., Misc. Total Current COUNTY Government Public Safety Highways Public Welfare Environment Expenditures Expenditures Non-Metro Counties Average $96.69 I: $79.91 $105:82 $230.01 $32:99 $23:85 8569.27 KANDIYOHI 62.50 99.61 60.14 316.19 18.30 24.52 581.26 KITTSON 190.87 75.76 215.06 194.01 55.02 34.86 765.57 KOOCHICHING 87.62 104.92 88.18 327.46 41.98 79.20 729.37 LAC QUI PARLE 81.40 36.16 154.69 162.25 30.76 17.30 482.56 LAKE 170.19 150.60 297.30 311.30 122.00 66.26 1117.70 LAKE OF THE WOODS 202.87 208.99 239,76 199:88 55.07 54,13 960.70 LE SUEUR 84.16 70.63 92;63 184:56 19:68 3:74 455 40 LINCOLN 108.86 47.73 133:67 95.32 80:32 82.84:: 548.73:::1 LYON 73.62 48.21 56.68 65:12 28.10 22.94 294.67 MAHNOMEN 127.97. 101.24 134.24 416.17 31.92 1590 82743`.: MARSHALL 87.77 55.76 171.64 191.64 83.63 32.48 622.93 MARTIN 65.19 70.11 72.06 54.58 29.02 30.96 321.92 3 MCLEOD 78.73 54.90 43.29 151.01 14.53 7.80 350.27 w MEEKER 64.41 62.27 72.25 210.60 17.31 11.01 437.86 .9 MILLE LACS 89.98 84.54 68.75 291.85 7.85 0.10 543.08 -I ......... ......... . . . . co MORRISON 77.96 91.92 71:82 250.60 14,08 10.67' 517:05x MOWER% 56.95 78.68 68.32 252:70 12:44 7.54' 476.63': o MURRAY: 86.02 59.88 102.76 76:51 51,11 16.50 392.77 w NICOLLET 77.01 42.44 40>47 151.93 13,28 37.19 362.32s D NOBLES 97.02 78.61 74!07 23595 37.58. 13.54 536.46 e NORMAN 112.53 75.75 188.24 211.31 47.97 44.69 680.48 ro OTTER TAIL 68.56 79.51 56.54 244.09 12.66 26.75 488.11 of Zip' PENNINGTON 73.91 78.91 68.72 255.28 21.94 22.21 520.96 PINE 74.00 123.12 96.14 282.22 12.01 8.01 595.52 PIPESTONE 76.83 66.83 80.43 223.66 19.96 41.55 509.25 Table 3 cont. y General Health and Culture,Rec., Misi:. Total Current COUNTY Government Public Safety Highways Public Welfare Environment Expenditures Expenditures a Non-Metro Counties m m Average :: $96.69 $79.91 4105:82 $2303)1 $3299:.. 423.85 $569 27 o o POLK 80.11 78.72 71.78 395.30 29.99 14.36 670.27 POPE 108.09 92.93 98.23 179.91 18.71 12.08 509.95 X RED LAKE 118.12 93.82 160.99 183.78 33.29 32.59 622.59 m REDWOOD 86.73 43.14 95.85 213.75 29.75 3.88 473.11 m 73.88 57.51 120.14 248.57 37.55 21.97 559.62 0 RENVILLE D RICE 63.55 :57.76 : 28,41 196:.18 10.41 485 361::.,:,;:17.....,::: w ROCK 67.79 72 75 67.30 162:65 24.82 37.54 432 84 m ROSEAU; ' :52.59` ! 36 59 123:69 122.81 36.94 10.37 382 99o SIBLEY10656 : 83 75 111.65 183:96 49.76 17.23 552 90: STEELS • 64.67 :71 26 53.28 145:64 14.69 2:19 . :351 74 STEVENS 92.72 43.31 113.37 198.65 22.88 21.66 492.58 SWIFT 97.95 62.70 113.05 242.35 51.11 53.76 620.92 TODD 77.16 90.35 109.75 284.69 17.92 10.80 590.67 TRAVERSE 130.44 67.48 297.52 250.84 46.50 9.48 802.28 WABASHA 66.72 54.09 76.40 164.94 14.99 4.31 381.45 1NADENA 71 99 101 02 59.57 363 D1 11.93 34 1:4. $.''"''4.•.•'.-::,'-''','.','.....::': 1 67 WASECA 102'52 67.28 81:49 169:23 23 97 2 33 *446482 WATONWAN 89 38 <65 30 100 89 72:24 38 68 27 28 393 76 WILKIN I23 17 * 4):9 : 197 62 293.18 26.30 26.93 708.20 WINONA 57 33 65 27 34:80 173.44 8 35 11.56 350 82 _YELLOW MEDICINE >:87 94 > 6426 11:5.84 237.33 34.85 39.70 <579 92:� Source:State Auditor Financial Data and MTA calculations. Table based on 1988 populations. Table 3 cont. Notes on Table 3 Definition of Spending Categories: General Government:Treasurer,county attorney recorder,veterans service officer, planning and zoning, buildings and plant, commissioners,courts, auditor, county administrator or other executive Health and Public Safety:Sheriff, court services(probation,jail),emergency services,coroner,health,sanitation Highways: Administration,operation end maintenance of highways Public Welfare:Minnesota Supplemental Assistance,AFDC, General Assistance,Work Readiness,food stamps,child support, Medical Assistance,Indochinese Refugee Program,fuel assistance,other social services,and administration of these programs Culture,Rec.,Environment: Historical society, library,parks,Minnesota Extension, Agriculture Society,soil and water Miscellaneous Economic development, interest and fiscal charges,and all other expenditures not elsewhere classified Total current expenditures:The sum of all listed above No capital outlay expenditures are included. o N 9 0 a X 0 1 St 0 D w 0 0 C). tv o' Table 4: School District Revenue Sources and Per Pupil Expenditure Amounts by Size of School District School Year 1989-90 t School Districts by Size Revenue Sources of Enrollment Total Enrollment Federal State Local/Other N 0- 199 7,101 7 % 53 % 40% K r.3 200-284 12,255 6 59 35 P 285 369 15,571 5 61 34 c 370-464 19,342 5 66 29 Eli 465-609 25,781 4 63 33 X 610-819 35,2•46 5 • 65 30o 820 1:149 • 50,4 17 6 62 32 P 1150-1849 • 67,085 4 66 :: ;30 1850- 3999 131,056 3 53 39 w 4000:: ••::÷. ! Table 4 cont. Notes on Table 4 District and School Administrations:School Board, Office of the Superintendent, principals, and other line administrators. District Support Services:Central office administration and office operations, business services,data processing,legal services, personnel office, and printing costs for school census. Regular Instruction: Elementary and secondary classroom instruction salaries of teachers, classroom aides,and coaches as well as expenditures for classroom supplies and for textbooks. Vocational Instruction:Job skills and career exploration, home economics, and industrial,business, agriculture,and distributive education. x Exceptional Instruction: Emotionally and psychologically handicapped, gifted and talented, and mentally retarded students with co physical, hearing, speech, and visual impairments as well as special learning and behavior problems. Instructional Support Services:Activities intended to help teachers provide instruction; Costs for assistant principals,curriculum D development, libraries,media centers, audio-visual support, staff development, and computer-assisted instruction. Pupil Support Services:Non-instructional services provided to students including counseling,guidance, health services,and °n psychological services as well as attendance and social work services. Operations and Maintenance: Operation, maintenance, and repair of the district's buildings, grounds,and equipment;Costs for custodians,fuel for buildings, electricity, telephones, and repairs. Food Service:Preparation and service of meals and snacks to students. Pupil Transportation:Transportation costs of students including salaries,contracted services,fuel for buses,and other expenditures. Other Operating Programs:General fund-operated programs necessary to a district's operations but assignable to other programs. Total PK-12 Operating Expenditures:The total of the eleven preceding categories. Community Service:Recreation, civic activities, adult education, early childhood education, and similar programs. Capital Outlay: Capital expenditures charged to the operating funds plus expenditures charged to the district's expenditure fund. Building Construction: Major capital projects funded by bond proceeds,state capital loans,state facility grants or the downpayment levy. Debt Services:Repayment of long term debt principal as well as interest on bonds and capital loans. Table 5: School District Revenue Sources and Per Pupil Expenditure Amounts by Selected School Districts School Year 1989-90 Revenue Source School District and No. Total Enrollment Federal State I Local/Other Anoka-Hennepin (11) 36,798 3 % 59% 38 % Mankato (77) 7,552 3 56 41 Brainerd 1181) 7,058 5 60 35 Burnsville(191) 10,630 2 40 58 Rosemount-Apple Valley(196) 20,899 2 56 42 Bloomington(271) 12,932 t7 81... Minneapolis(SP1# Osseo>(279) 20,880 2f 53 4S fiobbinsdale((281# 15;536. Z: 36 62 Wayzata (284) 7,614 1 16 83 Rochester(535) 14,633 3 51 46 Moundsview (621) 12,597 2 37 61 m North St. Paul-Maplewood (622) 10,077 2 39 59 Roseville 1623) 7,037 3 23 74 White€Bear Lake(S24) . • St..Paul(625) 36,931 7: 45 48 0 Duluth(709) .,i 15,628 6 72 Z2 m St.Claud (742) 11,831 3: 53 44 CO Forest Lake(831) 7,788 Z 63. 35 o South Washington County (833) 11,907 2 58 40 0 ro Stillwater(834) 8,852 2 47 51 U Table 5 cont. District/School District Regular Vocational Exceptional School District and No. Administration Support Serv. Instruction Instruction Instruction K N °' Anoka-Hennepin (11) $194 $100 $1,739 $81 $516 7 CD Mankato (77) 202 79 2,066 71 496 c Brainerd (181) 155 126 1,788 230 662 in Burnsville (191) 250 1 1 1 2,161 108 566 -i m Rosemount-Apple Valley(196) 204 103 1,836 44 376 a Hopkins (270) 261 233 2,352 106 842.. o Bloomington 1271) 273 146 2,327 61 473 w Minneapolis(SP1) 304 177 '' 1,714 108 927 Osseo(279) 238 144 1,873 84 438 0 Robbinsdalel(281)I 216 100 2,300: 107 659 `' Wayzata (284) 409 158 2,210 24 479 o Rochester(535) 250 115 1,895 99 542 Moundsview (621) 156 130 2,149 117 573 North St. Paul-Maplewood (622) 240 126 2,200 77 538 Roseville (623) 289 146 2,189 118 653 White Bear Lake(624) 216 66 1,964 94 432 St.Paul(625) : 267 183 1,977 77 1,032 Duluth(709) 277 132 1,471 172 • 775 St.Cloud (742) 120 " 80 1,766 94 784 Forest Lake(8311 256 43 1,815 61. 348 South Washington County (833) 202 149 1,849 92 390 Stillwater(834) 238 88 2,262 48 340 Table 5 cont. Instructional Pupil Support Operations and Pupil School District and No. Support Serv. Services Maintenance Food Service Transportation Anoka-Hennepin (11) $153 $130 $276 $201 $228 Mankato (77) 143 86 345 166 182 Brainerd (181) 170 91 289 209 265 Burnsville(191) 145 147 413 157 208 Rosemount-Apple Valley(196) 183 83 320 133 185 Hopkins(270) 309 282 424 173 256 Btoomington.(271) 199 189 346 1:77 238 Minneapolis (SP1) 220 112 367'; 1:94 4;41 Osseo:(279) ! 304 145 300 163 245 Robbinsdale(281) 183 241 415 169 222 Wayzata (284) 215 146 450 155 269 Rochester(535) 263 114 346 152 261 Moundsview (621) 152 142 374 159 220 3 North St. Paul-Maplewood (622) 204 143 250 199 189 c Roseville(623) 363 157 395 158 222 m White.Bear Lake(624}' 171 145 340; 159 153 x St.Pau11625),I 147 237 521 203 224. m Duluth(709) 261 173 444 152 2:37 m St.Cloud (742} 284 97 279 175 207 m Forest Lake (831) 184 78 307 182 258 D ca South Washington County (833) 173 80 278 158 206 Stillwater(834) 123 131 315 147 212 m N c.O V 7 Minnesota Taxpayers Association U r. 60 1- (.0 In NU Lf) 1•••• N •,/ CO 01 • 03 .4* 0) •11) Is‘ r•••• fft, N CO (0 1.0 Go N C•4 1 e t N N 1- CM N (V)..11> es C N CO 01 N f's t•1 ID •,(1- CO 0 (0 0- (0 (0 0 5 e_ r-- o co et N co a) a )cr (,) r•-• cc) N (NJ N N To csi c,) co r) fr) co) et a) co (NI •zr c,a N co el• tr) co N , c.) 8 co ,o• 0) o c. 03 .-- N 0) (0' CO N — r. N CO I.. N E co co 03 N CO I.. a) o cr) co et csi (c) (') o co 0 c- cc) 0 E 0 t-O (NI t",1 N N Osl (e) C•1 N U ()1 X O. 0 to) S•1 0 N o- t•I .(1- 0 (- 0 (0 N 01 CO t13 11) 1.1'3 N 1.• 0) 03 COC) C•1 0) (0 CD - - N CO 0) 0 CT 0) W IC, 0 • CI C•1 C.1 I.0 lt) C4) Tr' Tr Tr Tr' 4:r Tr C0 tr) (4) C • - o4n. C.11 0 12- c cc) to r••• N N 03 •-• ul et co r•-• - 0 . 0) CO .0 '0 - 0 01 N 40 ('41 03 NNNN 0) CO N (0 0 07, co .- C'4 (0 .- :17 41) O. 0 0 0 7 N 1.1 •-• Z.C-3 N U C tO CO E 0 0) > o cst co 3 co o 3.4- 0 0 CCD • ••••••• • ' . — ...c4•— z:,45 .2 — cr) < C to C Cst °. r... 12 • to. <0 0 o ° C'A ° c•s -o 0.'",J••• 13. 0 .,0 .c a, 03 'M` •• .- O 0c •- ... u) .cLoccr.r..c2 , o tulz :5C, c0 •0 .0 .- 0o 0 o 0 co co a m co cc z Fa 2-c) cc 3 cc 2z cc.s o ua.u. u) u) 28 _ _ About the Minnesota Taxpayers Association .... The Minnesota Taxpayers Association wasfounded in 1926 for the purpose of disseminating factual information that will help keep all Minnesotans educated and informed about state tax and spending policies. For sixty-five years, the Association has advocated the adoption of` sound fiscal policies through its publications, meetings, and research efforts. The Association is anon-profit, non-partisan group sup- ported by membership dues. To support the goals of.the Minnesota Taxpayers Associa- tion, we encourage you to join by calling (612)2241.7477 or (800)322-TAXSMembership contributions may be deductible as a business expense. Minnesota.Taxpayers Association 480 Cedar Street Suite 375 Daniel A...Salomone Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101 Executive Director League of Minnesota Cities g Li I . Cities Bulletin Number 31 November 8, 1991 "Are you upset about property taxes you paid this year?" asks MTA Booklet offers advice to help prepare citizens for local taxation hearings In anticipation of the"truth in Because we believe that it is "will also tell you when and where you taxation"hearings,the Minnesota important for all cities to have access can go to question your local officials Taxpayers Association(MTA)is to the information in the booklet prior about their intentions for your pocket- circulating an"educational booklet to their public hearings,the League book!"(Emphasis included in original about property taxes as part of an has purchased copies of the booklet document.) effort to inform and motivate and is sending one copy to each city. Of particular concern to cities,the taxpayers." Your city will receive a copy during booklet provides revenue and spending "With a basic understanding of the the week of November 11. tables for cities,counties,and school (property tax and state aid)system, We urge city councilmembers districts(pages 10-16)which have taxpayers might take a greater interest and city staff to familiarize them- been calculated using calendar 1989 in state and local budget hearings," selves with the information and with state auditor data,which is now two according to MTA Executive Director the perspectives in the booklet. The years old. In addition,presentation of Dan Salamone. The booklet advises booklet questions accountability by one year of data provides a snapshot in taxpayers that"it's not too late to have local officials,and advises that 1989 time,a view of one year of revenue your say about your 1992 property tax state auditor statistics can provide and spending for a city. Historical bill." taxpayers with justifiable compari- data,showing a trend of spending or The League believes that the MTA sons of governmental efficiency and taxing by a city,would be a more booklet will have a strong influence on effectiveness. The booklet does not, valuable tool for local taxpayers. citizens who receive it. The intention however,provide adequate informa- When considering the data is to incite action on the part of voters, tion about the affects of state tax and provided by the MTA booklet,it but not necessarily to provide any aid decisions on local budgets. should be understood that cities vary greater understanding of factors such During the months of November substantially in both their spending as the state's influence on local and December,cities,counties,and needs and revenue sources. Simplifi- property taxes. It will,however, school districts must hold their"truth cation would be helpful,but there is provide additional information about in taxation"hearings. The 28-page NO ideal spending level for all cities. local revenue sources and local booklet contains explanations from the (See discussions of Tables 1 and 2.) spending. MTA perspective concerning the The factors influencing city taxes The booklet provides per capita purpose of the"truth in taxation" include the following amounts: state spending information to encourage program--how it should work and what aid and the 1990, 1991,and 1992 cuts; citizens to compare their city revenue questions taxpayers should ask about federal grants and aid,and their or spending to other cities or to a local spending and revenues when they reductions;the amount each city has in calculated average for all cities. The attend these hearings. In describing its fund balance;the extent to which extent to which such comparisons will the"truth in taxation"notice that will the city has been legally allowed to explain local taxing and spending be sent to taxpayers by November 8, use special assessments;the authority decisions is questionable. the booklet introduction states that it See Property taxes,page 3 - Property taxes,continued from page 1 - • each city has from the Legislature to of the"truth in taxation"requirements city revenue raised in Minnesota. The impose other,non-property taxes;the --to facilitate meaningful discussions Table la below shows the MTA amount of population and/or tax base between city officials and taxpayers'on unweighted data and the state auditor's growth and resulting growth-related the issue of local property taxes. weighted data for all cities and for revenues;the financial stability of The tables in the MTA handbook cities under 2,500 population. local utilities;etc. include statistics that could mislead Comparative information about Factors influencing city spending and confuse citizens. The average per capita expenditures for the 110 will include: local crime rates; revenue and spending figures for the largest cities and"averages"by population growth or decline;identity various city groupings are unweighted- population groups of cities are shown as a regional center,free-standing city, -thereby assigning the same impor- in Table 2 of the booklet. Only in the smaller city,or suburban city;city tance to a city with a population of notes following these tables does it contributions to senior centers, 100 and a city of 100,000. We believe acknowledge the questionable value of regional libraries,hospitals,etc.;and the arithmetic average can be mislead- the comparative data and the differ- costs for services which the city ing especially when comparing a ences in local conditions which result contracts for which the city has no particular city to a group average that in substantial variation in statistics on control over. contains many cities of dissimilar size. spending. Cities will want to make The MTA is distributing the For example,in Table la,the sure that taxpayers note these com- booklet to chambers of commerce and MTA booklet reports that the average ments on page 16 of the booklet, other business organizations. Cities city in Minnesota receives 23.1 particularly the following statement: should consider how such organi7.a- percent of its revenue from the tions within their community would property tax and TIF,when the use this information at the public weighted average tells us that the See Taxes,page 4 hearing on proposed levies. property tax is 28.9 percent of the total On Sunday,November 3,the Star Tribune newspaper ran an editorial discussing the upcoming"truth in Table la: taxation"hearings and commending Variation in the Composition of Reported Revenues - the MTA for the preparation of this for Minnesota Cities booklet. The editorial refers to the Minnesota Taxpayer's Association v.State Auditor requirement for"truth in taxation" For Fiscal Year Ending December 31,1989 notices as an"important tax-reform innovation." It calls the MTA booklet All Cities a"helpful aid,""impressive,"though All Cities Cities < 2,500 with a"slightly anti-tax tone." It also Cities State < 2,500 State reports some of the out-of-date MTA Auditors MTA Auditor comparative statistics and questions Property Taxes and TIF 23.1% 28.9% 21.4% 21.9% the spending of many of the cities with higher than average per capita statis- Taxes Other Than Property 0.2% 2.6% 0.0% 0.1% a tics. The publicity will likely increase Special Assessments 5.0% 8.2% 4.5% 5.7% f the interest in the booklet and taxpayer interest in the information it provides. Licenses and Permits 2.1% 2.2% 2.0% 1.3% Apparently MTA will also be Federal Aid 6.3% 4.9% 7.3% 8.9% providing information about state spending in a publication titled State Aid and Credits 40.1% 29.7% 41.9% 39.7% "Pocket Guide to Government Spend- Transfers from Other Local ing in Minnesota"to be released in the Governments 1.1% 1.2% 1.1% 1.0% spring of 1992. User Fees and Fines 6.3% 7.6% 6.1% 6.8% I Evaluation of the Miscellaneous and Interest 15.6% 14.7% 15.7% 14.5% statistical information Total Per Capita Revenues $456.82 $667.60 $436.51 $521.19 In Table 1,the booklet groups ,:4:2v- cities by size and reports the average `,:i,,.,imposition of revenue for cities of 'See the State Auditor's report Revenues,Expenditures,and Debt of the Cities in ` " , .le size. Such information Minnesota,For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31,1989,page 5 and 7. not address the primary purpose -'1 i ber 8, 1991 Printed on recycled paper Page 3 - Taxes, continued from page 3 I "Spending data shown vary for it is important to evaluate and considerably less dramatic. many reasons,most notably due to... interpret this information as it City officials should also be aware local conditions,such as crime rates, relates to your city. that the column titled"Misc."includes poverty levels,etc. A complete Table 2a shows that the arithmetic interest and fiscal charges as reported analysis of variations in spending from and weighted averages in per capita in 1989. The state auditor's report one community to another must take spending for all cities can be vastly does not include interest and fiscal these factors into account." different. For total current city changes in current expenditures. For This per capita data is provided to finding in 1989,the weighted cities with substantial development or be used as a benchmark for appropri- average of$444.83 is 58 percent capital improvement costs,this item ate city spending. Citizens who higher than the arithmetic average dramatically increases the total per • receive this booklet will be asking provided in the Taxpayer's Association capita spending of the city. Interest their city officials for explanations of handbook. Similarly,the weighted costs for individual cities may have 1 the per capita costs of their city average total current spending for substantial year to year variations. If cities under 2,500population is the miscellaneous column is very compared to"an average city." $307.96 or 17 percent higher than the large,cities should determine the Understanding the incomplete, arithmetic average. The variance extent of the influence of interest and potentially misleading nature of between the arithmetic and the charges. per capita comparisons as an weighted average for more narrowly Please contact Sarah Hackett, explanation of city expenditures is defined groupings based on population Gary Carlson,or John Tomlinson at now the responsibility of city (i.e.cities 2,500 to 5,000 population) (612)227-5600 if you have questions. councils and staff. In preparation provided in the booklet will be SH/GC for your"truth in taxation"hearing, • Table 2a: • Variation in Reported Per Capita Expenditures for Minnesota Cities Minnesota Taxpayer's Association v.State Auditor For Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 1989 Gener Health Street Culture Housing Miscella Total al &Public Mainten and Rec &Econ neous Current All Cities Gov't Safety ance Dev Expend MTA Arithmetic Average 67.24 66.57 59.26 20.64 12.66 55.28 281.66 Weighted Average 67.16 144.91 58.82 52.39 31.68 89.87 444.83 Cities under 2,500 Population MTA Arithmetic Average 68.53 57.28 59.74 15.46 12.23 49.05 4 262.29 Weighted Average 70.15 78.32 61.89 21.05 13.25 63.30 307.96 F t F Points cities should discuss at the "truth in taxation" hearing •A primary discussion at your •Cities with growing populations services cannot be drastically cut to city's"truth in taxation"hearing can describe the increasing service and remaining populations; should be the impact of state aid on infrastructure needs of their commu- •Officials should be prepared to local budgets,and an explanation- nity,and the need to construct infra- address both the 1989 and the 1992 missing from the notices and structure in advance of development; budgets for their cities. The infor- required advertisements-of •Cities with declining populations mation provided in the MTA increased local property tax levies can describe bow cost savings for handbook could divert attention which are due to cuts in 1992 state smaller populations will lag behind the from the current budget and require aid to cities; population counts,and that basic explanations of the 1989 budget. Page 4 Printed on recycled paper LMC Cities Bulletin Li. . 11-8-91 CITY TAXABLE VALUE AFTER FISCAL DISPARITY AND TAX INCREMENT PROPOSED % OF CITY OR TWP. 1991 1992 DIFFERENCE CHANGE APPLE VALLEY 19,860,460 19,539,851 (320,609) -1.614% BURNSVILLE 451768,489 44.548.319 (1 ,220, 170) -2.666% CASTLE ROCK 803.611 800,231 (3,380) -0.421% COATES 96,640 97,858 1,218 1 .260% DOUGLAS 379,009 383,570 4,561 1 .203% EAGAN 50,011,499 45,026,787 (4,984,712) -9.967% EMPIRE 744.721 746,351 1 ,630 0.219% EUREKA 873,974 881,583 7,609 0.871% FARMINGTON 2,525,411 2,540,499 15,088 0.597% GREENVALE 436,643 440, 163 3,520 0.806% HAMPTON TWP. 490,530 470,429 (20, 101) -4.098% HAMPTON CITY ' 129,619 138,960 9.341 7.207% HASTINGS 7,207,812 7.239.998 32, 186 0.447% INVER GROVE HOTS. 14.342,229 13,994,052 (348, 177) -2.428% LAKEVILLE 13.235,245 14,619,709 1.384.464 10.460% LILYDALE 11135,397 1,058,500 (76.897) -6.773% MARSHAN 778.434 787.834 9.400 1 .208% MENDOTA HEIGHTS 11 ,425,053 10,731,345 (693,708) -6.072% MENDOTA 121,277 121,751 474 0.391% MIESVILLE 78.637 79. 116 479 0.609% NEW TRIER 27,473 28,897 1,424 5.183% NININGER 510,710 490,505 (20,205) -3.956% NORTHFIELD 162.572 171,688 9, 116 5.607% RANDOLPH TWP. 304, 136 310,016 5,880 1.933% RANDOLPH CITY 94,651 95,560 909 0.960% RAVENNA 793.601 842,213 48.612 6.125% ROSEMOUNT 6,484,486 6,539,598 55, 112 0.850% SCIOTA 159,227 157,018 (2.209) -1.387% SOUTH ST. PAUL 8,575,432 8,425,314 (150. 118) -1.751% SUNFISH LAKE 1,0611728 1,013,726 (48,002) -4.521% VERMILLION TWP. 630.459 704.037 73,578 11.671% VERMILLION CITY 168,017 161.092 (6,925) -4.122% WATERFORD 290,367 3121114 21,747 7.489% WEST ST. PAUL 13.210.942 12.512, 147 (698,795) -5.290% TOTAL 2021918.491 196,010,831 (6,907.660) -3.404% Y SCHOOL DISTRICTS COMPARISON !=,^oilcscct % OF 1991 1992 DIFFERENCE CHANGE 6 8,476,613 8,325,598 (151 ,015) -1 .782% 191 42,210,872 40,237,827 (1 ,973,045) -4.674X 192 4,630,803 4,753,012 122,209 2.639% 194 15,458,272 16,704,361 1,246,089 8.061% 195 1, 119,990 1, 121,340 1,350 0.121% 196 65,640,953 64,883, 119 (757,834) -1.155% 197 46,928,049 41 ,962,406 (4,965,643) -10.581% 199 13,472,782 13,052, 170 (420,612) -3.122% 200 ,121028,901 12,255,876 226,975 1.887% S.D. TOTAL 209,967,235 203,295,709 (6,671,526) -3.177% Prepared bv: Norma B. Marsh Dakota County Auditor DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL APPLE VALLEY 191 1991 0.22542 0.24654 0.50693 0.03477 1 .01366 1992 0.25596 0.25677 0.60606 0.04470 1 . 16349 0.03054 0.01023 0.09913 0.00993 0.14983 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 4.1494% 19.5550% 28.5591% 14.7811% 196 1991 0.22542 0.24654 0.48559 0.03477 0.99232 1992 0.25596 0.25677 0.53617 0.04470 1 .09360 0.03054 0.01023 0.05058 0.00993 0.1012.3 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 4.1494% 10.4162% 28.5591% 10.2064% BURNSVILLE 191 1991 0.22542 0.17902 0.50693 0.03425 0.94562 1992 0.25596 0.18685 0.60606 0.04400 1.09287 0.03054 0.00783 0.09913 0.00975 0.14725 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 4.3738% 19.5550% 28.4672% 15.5718% 194 1991 0.22542 0.17902 0.60372 0.03425 1 .04241 1992 0.25596 0.18685 0.60629 0.04400 1 .09310 0.03054 0.00783 0.00257 0.00975 0.05069 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 4.3738% 0.4257% 28.4672% 4.8628% 196 1991 0.22542 0.17902 0.48559 0.03425 0.92428 1992 0.25596 0.18685 0.53617 0.04400 1 .02298 0.03054 0.00783 0.05058 0.00975 0.0987 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 4.3738% 10.4162% 28.4672% 10.6786% DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL CASTLE ROCK 192 1991 0.22542 0.08184 0.64901 0.01448 0.97075 1992 0.25596 0.08280 0.69483 0.01935 1 .05294 0.03054 0.00096 0.04582 0.00487 0.08219 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 1.1730% 7.0600% 33.6326% 8.4666% 195 1991 0.22542 0.08184 0.57188 0.01448 0.89362 1992 0.25596 0.08280 0.59923 0.01935 0.95734 0.03054 0.00096 0.02735 0.00487 0.06372 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 1.1730% 4.7825% 33.6326% 7.1305% 659 1991 0.22542 0.08184 0.62886 0.01448 0.95060 1992 0.25596 0.08280 0.66865 0.01935 1 .02676 0.03054 0.00096 0.03979 0.00487 0.07616 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 1.1730% 6.3273% 33.6326% 8.0118% COATES 196 1991 0.22542 0.08543 0.48559 0.01448 0.81092 1992 0.25596 0.08334 0.53617 0.01935 0.89482 0.03054 -0.00209 0.05058 0.00487 0.08390 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -2.4464% 10.4162% 33.6326% 10.3463% DOUGLAS 195 1991 0.22542 0.07274 0.57188 0.01448 0.88452 1992 0.25596 0.07288 0.59923 0.01935 0.94742 0.03054 0.00014 0.02735 0.00487 0.0629 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 0.1925% 4.7825% 33.6326% 7.1112% 200 1991 0.22542 0.07274 0.51874 0.01448 0.83138 1992 0.25596 0.07288 0.51366 0.01935 0.86185 0.03054 0.00014 -0.00508 0.00487 0.03047 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 0.1925% -0.9793% 33.6326% 3.6650% 252 1991 0.22542 0.07274 0.49140 0.01448 0.80404 1992 0.25596 0.07288 0.52644 0.01935 0.87463 0.03054 0.00014 0.03504 0.00487 0.07059 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 0.1925% 7.1306% 33.6326% 8.7794% • r DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL EAGAN 191 1991 0.22542 0.15856 0.50693 0.03477 0.92568 1992 0.25596 0.18262 0.60606 0.04470 1 .08934 0.03054 0.02406 0.09913 0.00993 0.16366 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 15.1741% 19.5550% 28.5591% 17.6800% 196 1991 0.22542 0.15856 0.48559 0.03477 0.90434 1992 0.25596 0.18262 0.53617 0.04470 1 .01945 0.03054 0.02406 0.05058 0.00993 0. 11511 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 15.1741% 10.4162% 28.5591% 12.7286% 197 1991 0.22542 0.15856 0.43713 0.03477 0.85588 1992 0.25596 0.18262 0.55907 0.04470 1 .04235 0.03054 0.02406 0.12194 0.00993 0.18647 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 15.1741% 27.8956% 28.5591% 21 .7869% EMPIRE 192 1991 0.22542 0.15060 0.64901 0.01448 1 .03951 1992 0.25596 0.17809 0.69483 0.01935 1 .14823 0.03054 0.02749 0.04582 0.00487 0.10872 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 18.2537% 7.0600% 33.6326% 10.4588% 196 1991 0.22542 0.15060 0.48559 0.01448 0.87609 1992 0.25596 0.17809 0.53617 0.01935 0.98957 0.03054 0.02749 0.05058 0.00487 0.11348 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 18.2537% 10.4162% 33.6326% 12.9530% c DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL EUREKA 192 1991 0.22542 0.10409 0.64901 0.01448 0.99300 1992 0.25596 0.11521 0.69483 0.01935 1 .08535 0.03054 0.01112 0.04582 0.00487 0.09235 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 10.6831% 7.0600% 33.6326% 9.3001% 194 1991 0.22542 0.10409 0.60372 0.01448 0.94771 1992 0.25596 0.11521 0.60629 0.01935 0.99681 0.03054 0.01112 0.00257 0.00487 0.0491 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 10.6831% 0.4257% 33.6326% 5.1809% 659 1991 0.22542 0.10409 0.62886 0.01448 0.97285 1992 0.25596 0.11521 0.66865 0.01935 1 .05917 0.03054 0.01112 0.03979 0.00487 0.08632 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 10.6831% 6.3273% 33.6326% 8.8729% FARMINGTON 192 1991 0.22457 0.27428 0.64753 0.01444 1 .16082 1992 0.25514 0.30959 0.69483 0.01787 1.27743 0.03057 0.03531 0.0473 0.00343 0.11661 PERCENT CHANGE 13.6127% 12.8737% 7.3047% 23.7535% 10.0455% GREENVALE 659 1991 0.22542 0.10016 0.62886 0.01448 0.96892 1992 0.25596 0.09291 0.66865 0.01935 1 .03687 0.03054 -0.00725 0.03979 0.00487 0.06795 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -7.2384% 6.3273% 33.6326% 7.0130% DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL HAMPTON TWP. 192 1991 0.22542 0.05224 0.64901 0.01396 0.94063 1992 0.25596 0.07537 0.69483 0.01865 1 .04481 0.03054 0.02313 0.04582 0.00469 0. 10418 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 44.2764% 7.0600% 33.5960% 11 .0756% 195 1991 0.22542 0.05224 0.57188 0.01396 0.86350 1992 0.25596 0.07537 0.59923 0.01865 0.94921 0.03054 0.02313 0.02735 0.00469 0.08571 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 44.2764% 4.7825% 33.5960% 9.9259% 200 1991 0.22542 0.05224 0.51874 0.01396 0.81036 1992 0.25596 0.07537 0.51366 0.01865 0.86364 0.03054 0.02313 -0.00508 0.00469 0.05328 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 44.2764% -0.9793% 33.5960% 6.5749% HAMPTON CITY 195 1991 0.22542 0.16650 0.57188 0.01448 0.97828 1992 0.25596 0.15039 0.59923 0.01935 1.02493 0.03054 -0.01611 0.02735 0.00487 0.04665 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -9.6757% 4.7825% 33.6326% 4.7686% 200 1991 0.22542 0.16650 0.51874 0.01448 0.92514 1992 0.25596 0.15039 0.51366 0.01935 0.93936 0.03054 -0.01611 -0.00508 0.00487 0.01422 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -9.6757% -0.9793% 33.6326% 1 .5371% HASTINGS 200 1991 0.22542 0.27960 0.51874 0.01735 1.04111 1992 0.25596 0.26795 0.51366 0.02243 1.06000 0.03054 -0.01165 -0.00508 0.00508 0.01889 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -4.1667% -0.9793% 29.2795% 1 .8144% DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL INVER GROVE 196 1991 0.22542 0.20458 0.48559 0.04190 0.95749 1992 0.25596 0.22078 0.53617 0.05165 1 .06456 0.03054 0.01620 0.05058 0.00975 0.10707 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 7.9187% 10.4162% 23.2697% 11 .1824% 197 1991 0.22542 0.20458 0.43713 0.04190 0.90903 1992 0.25596 0.22078 0.55907 0.05165 1 .08746 0.03054 0.01620 0.12194 0.00975 0.17843 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 7.9187% 27.8956% 23.2697% 19.6286% 199 1991 0.22542 0.20458 0.63495 0.04190 1 . 10685 1992 0.25596 0.22078 0.67147 0.05165 1 . 19986 0.03054 0.0162 0.03652 0.00975 0.09301 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 7.9187% 5.7516% 23.2697% 8.4031% LAKEVILLE 192 1991 0.22542 0.20811 0.64901 0.01448 1 .09702 1992 0.25596 0.19062 0.69483 0.01935 1 .16076 0.03054 -0.01749 0.04582 0.00487 0.06374 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -8.4042% 7.0600% 33.6326% 5.8103% 194 1991 0.22542 0.20811 0.60372 0.01448 1 .05173 1992 0.25596 0.19062 0.60629 0.01935 1 .07222 0.03054 -0.01749 0.00257 0.00487 0.02049 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -8.4042% 0.4257% 33.6326% 1 .9482% 196 1991 0.22542 0.20811 0.48559 0.01448 0.93360 1992 0.25596 0.19062 0.53617 0.01935 1.00210 0.03054 -0.01749 0.05058 0.00487 0.0685 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -8.4042% 10.4162% 33.6326% 7.3372% DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL LILYDALE 197 1991 0.22542 0.14895 0.43713 0.03477 0.84627 1992 0.25596 0.16128 0.55907 0.04470 1 .02101 0.03054 0.01233 0. 12194 0.00993 0.17474 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 8.2779% 27.8956% 28.5;91% 20.64883% MARSHAN 200 1991 0.22542 0.12013 0.51874 0.01448 0.87877 1992 0.25596 0.10445 0.51366 0.01935 0.89342 0.03054 -0.01568 -0.00508 0.00487 0.01465 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480%-13.0525% -0.9793% 33.6326% 1 .6671% MENDOTA CITY 197 1991 0.21983 0.21898 0.42749 0.03370 0.90000 1992 0.22490 0.69931 0.50520 0.03945 1 .46886 0.00507 0.48033 0.07771 0.00575 0.56886 PERCENT CHANGE 2.3063%219.3488% 18.1782% 17.0623% 63.2067% MENDOTA HEIGHTS 197 1991 0.22542 0.17462 0.43713 0.03732 0.87449 1992 0.25596 0.19317 0.55907 0.04725 1 .05545 0.03054 0.01855 0.12194 0.00993 0.18096 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 10.6231% 27.8956% 26.6077% 20.6932% MIESVILLE 200 1991 0.22542 0.07522 0.51874 0.01448 0.83386 1992 0.25596 0.13353 0.51366 0.01935 0.92250 0.03054 0.05831 -0.00508 0.00487 0.08864 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 77.5193% -0.9793% 33.67?6% 10.6301% NEW TRIER 200 1991 0.22542 0.05100 0.51874 0.01448 0.80964 1992 0.25596 0.03783 0.51366 0.01935 0.82680 0.03054 -0.01317 -0.00508 0.00487 0.01710 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480%-25.8235% -0.9793% 33.6326% 2. 1195% DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL NININGER 200 1991 0.22542 0.05808 0.51874 0.014E8 0.21672 1992 0.25596 0.13702 0.51366 0.01935 0.92599 0.03054 0.07894 -0.00508 0.00487 0. 10927 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480%135.9160% -0.9793% 33.6326% 13.3791% RANDOLPH TWP. 195 1991 0.22542 0.07777 0.57188 0.01448 0.88955 1992 0.25596 0.08141 0.59923 0.01935 0.95595 0.03054 0.00364 0.02735 0.00487 0.0664 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 4.6805% 4.7825% 33.6326% 7.4644% 252 1991 0.22542 0.07777 0.49140 0.01448 0.80907 1992 0.25596 0.08141 0.52644 0.01935 0.88316 0.03054 0.00364 0.03504 0.00487 0.07409 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 4.6805% 7.1306% 33.6326% 9.1574% RANDOLPH CITY 195 1991 0.22542 0.09754 0.57188 0.01448 0.90932 1992 0.25596 0.10518 0.59923 0.01935 0.97972 0.03054 0.00764 0.02735 0.00487 0.0704 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 7.8327% 4.7825% 33.6326% 7.7420% RAVENNA 200 1991 0.22542 0.12154 0.51874 0.01448 0.88018 1992 0.25596 0.12653 0.51366 0.01935 0.91550 0.03054 0.00499 -0.00508 0.00487 0.03532 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 4.1056% -0.9793% 33.6326% 4.0128% DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL ROSEMOUNT 196 1991 0.22542 0.27705 0.48559 0.03477 1 .02283 1992 0.25596 0.29166 0.53617 0.04470 1 . 12849 0.03054 0.01461 0.05058 0.00993 0. 10566 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 5.2734% 10.4162% 28.5591% 10.3302% 199 1991 0.22542 0.27705 0.63495 0.03477 1 .17219 1992 0.25596 0.29166 0.67147 0.04470 1 .26379 0.03054 0.01461 0.03652 0.00993 0.0916 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 5.2734% 5.7516% 28.5591% 7.8144% 200 1991 0.22542 0.27705 0.51874 0.03477 1.05598 1992 0.25596 0.29166 0.51366 0.04470 1 .10598 0.03054 0.01461 -0.00508 0.00993 0.05000 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 5.2734% -0.9793% 28.5591% 4.7349% SCIOTA 195 1991 0.22542 0.08393 0.57188 0.01448 0.89571 1992 0.25596 0.08582 0.59923 0.01935 0.96036 0.03054 0.00189 0.02735 0.00487 0.06465 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 2.2519% 4.7825% 33.6326% 7.2177% 659 1991 0.22542 0.08393 0.62886 0.01448 0.95269 1992 0.25596 0.08582 0.66865 0.01935 1.02978 0.03054 0.00189 0.03979 0.00487 0.07709 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 2.2519% 6.3273% 33.6326% 8.0918% a DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL SOUTH ST. PAUL 6 1991 0.21033 0.23943 0.50819 0.04678 1 .00473 1992 0.24151 0.25652 0.61355 0.05553 1. 16711 0.03118 0.01709 0.10536 0.00875 0.16238 PERCENT CHANGE 14.8243% 7.1378% 20.7324% 18.7046% 16.1616% 199 1991 0.21033 0.23943 0.63495 0.04678 1 . 13149 1992 0.25596 0.25652 0.67147 0.04108 1.22503 0.04563 0.01709 0.03652 -0.00570 0.09354 PERCENT CHANGE 21.6945% 7.1378% 5.7516%-12.1847% 8.2670% SUNFISH LAKE 197 1991 0.22542 0.15511 0.43713 0.03477 0.85243 1992 0.25596 0.17599 0.55907 0.04470 1.03572 0.03054 0.02088 0.12194 0.00993 0.18329 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 13.4614% 27.8956% 28.5591% 21.5021% VERMILLION TWP. 192 1991 0.22542 0.14208 0.64901 0.01448 1 .03099 1992 0.25596 0.13325 0.69483 0.01935 1 .10339 0.03054 -0.00883 0.04582 0.00487 0.0724 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -6.2148% 7.0600% 33.6326% 7.0224% 196 1991 0.22542 0.14208 0.48559 0.01448 0.86757 1992 0.25596 0.13325 0.53617 0.01935 0.94473 0.03054 -0.00883 0.05058 0.00487 0.07716 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -6.2148% 10.4162% 33.6326% 8.8938% 200 1991 0.22542 0.14208 0.51874 0.01448 0.90072 1992 0.25596 0.13325 0.51366 0.01935 0.92222 0.03054 -0.00883 -0.00508 0.00487 0.02150 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -6.2148% -0.9793% 33.6326% 2.3870% .1 DATE 11-6-91 DAKOTA COUNTY COMPARISON OF PROPOSED TAX CAPACITY RATES S/D YEAR COUNTY CITY SCHOOL OTHER TOTAL VERMILLION CITY 200 1991 0.22542 0.21469 0.51874 0.01448 0.97333 1992 0.25596 0.22552 0.51366 0.01935 1 .01449 0.03054 0.01083 -0.00508 0.00487 0.04116 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 5.0445% -0.9793% 33.6326% 4.2288% WATERFORD 195 1991 0.22542 0.07948 0.57188 0.01448 0.89126 1992 0.25596 0.07681 0.59923 0.01935 0.95135 0.03054 -0.00267 0.02735 0.00487 0.06009 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -3.3593% 4.7825% 33.6326% 6.7421% 659 1991 0.22542 0.07948 0.62886 0.01448 0.94824 1992 0.25596 0.07681 0.66865 0.01935 1 .02077 0.03054 -0.00267 0.03979 0.00487 0.07253 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% -3.3593% 6.3273% 33.6326% 7.6489% WEST ST. PAUL 197 1991 0.22542 0.18558 0.43713 0.04242 0.89055 1992 0.25596 0.21084 0.55907 0.05235 1.07822 0.03054 0.02526 0.12194 0.00993 0.18767 PERCENT CHANGE 13.5480% 13.6114% 27.8956% 23.4088% 21 .0735% 4 $1 A a Y Iii ? > O C.2 n 7 0, D) w = a CO 0, 70 ' 0 se °•°., c y.° 0 o� m< 3' 3 ;. •,. N A C n < O H C W 73 a� =1 n' ;4.. ° M =' A A fD N Rs C � O T O S q y 1n O d N 0 51c7, 5 " 51 N H OOpD C N pN C1-: O• - C 'a1 d r► u u » NTeD < N7'� O• L. O ial CO [!1 WC wd 7a LH I=•p o-an O O'00 0 O O ' N E N .. k.e Oalm a0/ p O O la mC n 000 3 a O o'. O QA -' ► O � �,, coP awdo $ aw;o A S� a p � � n r 7 N O 0 N O p N O A ONa O dig dap �'o li o,z c, 3 NN) r $P d a y fD A fDft A el m. Xi CL 0 a f ) 09 eb (15 N N W _. � N -+ � N � O O O W NN "-In NNOV V O V ;4 L+ OC% Co ea 00 � til VI NI V V V ° ao o o a° kz rb rte. 21 H A IL rby su O -• -• w 00 N O0 - -` 0 O O W N -' Co 00 la AO � � O OCn 41. .p CCO e e ° (Ao o ul o 0 0 0 a o 0 o Z et vz V o a 4r► > O O.A n 3 m co 3 V ; tot < N a u,O o a� el ..y. '- a UI ! flU CN3-. � E re oCr AcrtO = A • 'A =-mac ° 0p ye n » I< _ 0 r „ cv� Fu ?p•rD AO IyCW„ O D' O dO �'QO j S C•Cd N -� N A •< O p t °( , ° d°- O O �°°n• ° .� $' 3 N —' IL N '+ d , On p p 1 0 OV U 0 oo Ooo '^QO . 0COO HO. A -. cb N CU s N O O` C N O O. N W A O N d C. "i 5 < A 0O. S' p 0N o+ 3c^ o. . v•+' 0,, 10 R n Z H n A ncn ii; co f� A 1...1 0- gia 5 C. �'C d qiii rb i 'I .i j 4 N N KX, -+ -+ N -+ —• N co p O N' N N n vN, vN, V V b v V -, O co; CO oo in 0 -+ a O O o O O \ U1 U1 V e \ N N \ V e e * o 0 o O a c c Or a at' H .J Q' ' A 'O N 0 0 N 0 0 --. ...aO p p N N N O` w in A 1a b 1. 41. o O ;xi. .A ..o. v,• O O e o 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 o fZD c 0 0 • Z A A A A A A A W W A NN C! A T A A C' C' d C' al C'C• C' Is' W W BJ N W w v v v v v v A ; in to ▪ = A 0 fl 3 °'o p -i n N d A A ° a a O. A ^ a a. 3 93 �3 3 d � 0 ?: o o = a 0 -0 d o A< an 0 12 o o � 3 U ' n O O E '� N so CO A " .r. O C 40+-Z M f0 A N A f9 ! 1II 2 ▪ cl• c 3 ' o000 ^ oo o0c a, 3 a , o o, 8Do _ doo. , o_f ; 8 o N f° 8 8 P °� r. ° 7▪ C 3.47 A c .... eR °� a v � A co d 7 EP; Q c• o a CD vsH • W W N N N W W W A W W N A W W N N r, C'� O W W W b b C. �O N it W Lc N O N N 3 o : : : : : : °: : : : Dir A W W N A W 0.. ow W W O O b. LON it. Lo Le i...) oc Or 12. 0 0 0 0 0 0° o 0 0° o° oe o. e A r to tH M C A O O m 7 n Z 3 N d A A _ o ° t1 I'. ° a 2 ° ° 3 a. C• C C c� ° '+ n . A w Z ri C1:1 Z' g c rn � ^ r � 3 rt � c i H c'. AA3 d '� O p N • .. Aon, O r. O C �M 4.,V/ < A HH A= A Nas• 3 S SA =. C 7 S �.CD 1 O 0 ^ 0 -. 0 E. 0'0 a. 7 3 c = 3 �p� c o Oo D o 0 0 ? D o d 0. �Gp :'� C C tD 'p O 0 `� o o '0 0 0 `c a co al 000 COto iii c A. `^et. o vs o c o_ c OD o A7 00 �1 Ie _ V4. a N -- H f1 - .... _ O Q rt O 1 0 -• _• 00 A H 7. c c a 'o, ^ T1 As y c a in -- '1 'jJ `"'i •0 YKY• i '1 t W N N Ln biN �N A W' W N A WS NDN N C� p O O 3. ari .� V �: O O v ��p4 �Ep i4 V1 H a1 O \ \ O , O:l ,-O O \ \ p fry 6e " O to t LO W N N N N •N N. W A W W N 4. W; N _. _. N te ae. \ \ \ ° o; es' a _at o o tvii tT IT o� oe, ee o' * o c • T £ ro It, N N (A N A A A . A A A A A A n A W N N.) ....i A d d ... ....-.n .n. ^. .n. n A r, v v .. .. .. w N .r OO V Q+ V1 0A y tb v v v v v v .r a x n= d ° 7 C Z O mai .11 Z O o 2 y 0 A O A, A c g d 3 g a 7 , o > c 4. r9 7- a dFS" , -• n T -a O _ to CD o yr c v, O 'fl O n S N Cin...k d o a = _• Dco f° c c 17 c a, e A °, ? 3 = g c '� O 3 '� ii g 1• 27 > > �^ ^ O yr c 12 C /9 y 2. O O iv „ V a 3. �A - 0 3 n, „ o o aro :' � °' .� 0 3 3 �• M a Ifl z 3 1, ° fl) . R. = a 3 o d to S n C N c c n n 3 ca. iii> > n O n -o H S n = N a c A' 3 2, g A o O v, A C R. C 01. 1 I7 C c v, N A f1 vi O c ain co cv N 3 a, x Q ro v, to, A A A A A N N W A N W N N N Na N n ID. 4, ;40 4:, 4) ;.0 La In Ln -• Lre Ln Ln ln Ln O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O 5.N cr cao ic W to 7 A A A W A N W A A N Ns w N N N N NCL io 43 is .o iin in -) b b w W W w w VI Ln v, to to az az 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I n D 6<i O C c C O Z; p = p 5. Z Z d - A 7o H A, O. c o a f j3 a A .: 0 > > �, d mo o -� c =� = o ° = o �'.' � c a. An n3n bT 3. A < ° 3 7 7y H o°e• 01 d ° a. -Z o 3 p el c C T VIaHU bqJIH „3 to • a 3 . . .. A y ° d H d T O = le 3 Yi'i o a a' C y C c O A ,',. C 'A N d T n S' '. 2 ° - o" o, • ,'• j .. .1 + •A{ A 4" -I). p N N W A N N N N N N N N N p V' V o: tat L^ to to 0 0 0 0 �0 0 0 o N o o W' �? a`° az o c c, c o ° c 0 0 o o o K IN A: A .. A': ji N N W A N N N N N N N N N V1' Cn tin (!1 VV, \o lo e in \in \ o O po \to \ \o La ei•J \ e I» o; a° c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o, AGENDA REQUEST FORM � (2;1Tt) lorfc;;;A/ITEM NO. NAME: Karen Finstuen DEPARTMENT: Administration ff DATE: November 12, 1991 / /0 MEETING DATE: November 18, 1991 CATEGORY: Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Agreement with HRA - Cable Across 3rd Street EXPLANATION: Used for banners and Christmas decorations. REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Agreement attached. REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Tom Kaldunski Public Works Jerry Henricks HRA SIGNATURE INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, by and between FARMINGTON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA) and the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City". WHEREAS, the City is desirous of using the building, known as the "Exchange Bank Building" at 340-344 Third Street, Farmington, Minnesota, to attach hardware to for the purpose of hanging a banner across Third Street for information and/or decoration; and WHEREAS, the HRA is agreeable to do so provided that the City indemnify them for any damage to his building or to third parties caused by said hardware and/or banners. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. That the HRA shall allow the City to construct and maintain brackets and/or other hardware necessary on the building located at 340-344 Third Street in the City of Farmington, Minnesota, for the purpose of hanging banners across Third Street. 2. That the City shall indemnify and hold the HRA harmless for any damage to their building or to third parties caused by the installation and maintenance of said brackets and/or hardware and the banners supported thereby except for any damages caused directly by the HRA's own acts. 3. The City will pay for any damage to the HRA's building as a result of this hardware being attached to the "Exchange Bank Building". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year as noted by their signatures. CITY OF FARMINGTON FARMINGTON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ele,„4--#e /e#4. Eugene "Babe" Kuchera Carol K. Sprute Mayor HRA Chairperson Attested to the day of , 1991. Thompson ,4 L Larry Thom p Gerald A. Henricks City Adminsitrator HRA Executive Director AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. NAME: James Bell DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation DATE: November 15, 1991 MEETING DATE: November 18, 1991 CATEGORY: Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Accept Donation of Funds - Senior Center EXPLANATION: See attached REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo - Jim Bell REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Jim Bell Parks and Recreation SIGNATURE MEMO TO: LARRY THOMPSON SUBJECT: TELEVISION AT SENIOR CENTER DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1991 The television at the Senior Center has failed. The repairman said that it was not worth fixing. Our Senior Center Advisory Council has recommended taking the $143.00 earned on their fashion show to buy a replacement. The local Senior club (FASC) has offered to pay the remaining money for a new 25 inch color television set. I recommend that the Council accept this donation. James Bell Parks and Recreation Director r PROPOSED• RESOLUTION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 18th day of November, 1991 at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Farmington Area Senior Center is in need of a television set to replace the current, non repairable one; and WHEREAS, the Farmington Area Senior Citizen Club (FASC) has proposed to donate the funds necessary to purchase a new television set for the Senior Center; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept such donation. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said donation by FASC is hereby accepted. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 18th day of November, 1991.