HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.01.89 Council Packet AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
MAY 1, 1989
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVE AGENDA
3. APPROVE MINUTES
a. April 12, 1989 Special Meeting
b. April 17, 1989 Regular Meeting
4. CITIZENS COMMENTS
a. Presentation of Plaques/Commendations
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. 7:30 P.M. - T.H. 50 Industrial Park Sanitary Sewer
6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS, COMMUNICATIONS
7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
a. Solid Waste Ordinance
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Complaint Policy
b. Demolition - 109 4th Street
c. MPCA Revolving Loan Fund
d. Review Plans and Specifications - Tanker Truck
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Approve 1990 ALF Budget
b. Stormwater Management
10. MISCELLANEOUS
a. Easement Over Ponding Area - Dakota County Estates 2nd
11. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Blanket Approval - LMC Annual Conference Attendance
b. Refund of Towing Charges
c. School/Conference Request - Solid Waste Coordinator
d. Approve Hiring of Permanent Part Time Clerk
e. School/Conference Request - Liquor Store Manager
f. Approval of Sexual Harassment Policy
g. Approve Payment #1 to MacQueen Equipment - 90 Gallon Containers
h. Approve Payment of the Bills
12. ADJOURN
13. ADD ON
a. Appoint Kay Inouye to Fill Senior Center Advisory Council Vacancy
b. Low Income Tax Credit Application
THE AGENDA IS CLOSED OUT AT NOON ON THE TUESDAY PRECEDING THE MEETING.
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
• ITEM NO. C3VL
NAME: Larry Thompson
1
DEPARTMENT: Administration �( A try---1-
DATE: April 21, 1989
MEETING DATE: May 1, 1989
CATEGORY: Unfinished Business
SUBJECT: Complaint Policy
E%PLANATION• Tabled from April 17, 1989 meeting.
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Sent Previously
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Department Heads
i
SIGNA ":
AGENDA REQUEST FORM �/. �..
401/111111
rAiii
ITEM NO.
NAME: Larry Thompson
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: "April 7, IV9 ,0)/0
MEETING DATE: .AREginc4;m0.41489404 s/! /f7
CATEGORY: Unfinished Business
SUBJECT: Complaint Policy
EXPLANATION: ettxc' e. �1-d % /7,//;4
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Mem s
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Department Heads
SIGNA'�
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: COMPLAINT POLICY
DATE: APRIL 11, 1989.
It is my understanding that the Council has directed staff to review the City's
complaint policy and recommend any changes accordingly. I have enclosed the
two existing policies (information and action requests) for your review. It
should be noted that while the Action Request policy sets out various guidelines,
it basically leaves it to the Department Heads discretion which complaints are
logged. Because of the large number of requests that the City receives on a
daily basis, it would not be feasible to record each one. It is my practice to
keep all notes for future reference.
It is also my understanding that the Council also discussed the possibility of
requiring persons to sign a complaint form when initiating a complaint. I see
this as being a problem from a practical as well as a legal standpoint. First,
the City receives several calls a day ranging from potholes, noisy dogs, messy
yards, weeds, snow removal, code violations etc. Many times the individual just
wants to point out a problem, and doesn't want to get fully involved. The City
staff relies heavily on the residents to be our eyes and ears for recognizing
problems so that we may respond to them. I am concerned that a policy requiring
signatures may discourage residents from filing complaints, concerns and so on.
Second, the enforcement of the Code has generally been given to staff. Normally,
when a complaint of a code violation is received, it is used as "information
only", and the proper staff person is sent to investigate. If it is determined
that a violation exists, the staff person becomes the person filing the complaint
on behalf of the City. This is most common with police, building code, weed,
nuisance and zoning violations. I am concerned that once the City was made aware
of a problem, our legal obligation or liability to enforce would cease because
the individual who initiated the complaint refused to sign a complaint form.
In summary, while staff reacts to code violations, a majority of the citations
are based on citizens complaints. I feel that requiring residents to sign
complaints would result in a reluctance from phoning in complaints, and the City
would lose a valuable tool in enforcing the ordinances. The system we utilize
appears to be working well, as noted by the limited amount of complaints of
non-response by City staff which reach the Council table. The Council could
require staff to request the name of the individual issuing the complaint, but if
the individual refuses to give their name, I feel staff should still react to it.
Larry Thompson
City Administrator
cc: Department Heads
file
CITY OF FARMINGTON
INFORMATION POLICY
I. Purpose:
It shall be the purpose of this policy to establish uniform rules
and procedures regarding the reporting of information from City
staff to the City Council.
II. Type of Information:
A. The following types of information shall be reported to the
City Council, in writing, within 24 hours of receipt of such
information:
1. Lost time employee injuries.
2. Property damage exceeding $1,000.\_
3. Threatened or pending litigation.
4. Employee disciplinary action involving suspension,
demotion or termination.
5. Complaints, recommendations, suggestions and so on,
directed specifically to the Council.
B. The following types of information shall be reported to the
Council on a monthly basis:
1. Number and type of building permits.
2. Status of claims for damages against the City.
3. Updated Budget summaries.
III. Responsible Authority:
Department Heads shall be responsible for all information directly
related to his/her department.
IV. Data Practices Act:
Information classified as private or non-public data under the pro-
visions of the Minnesota Data Practices Act shall be clearly labeled
and shall not be disseminated in any manner to any person unless
indicated so.
V. Method of Notification:
Information shall be placed in the Council members' mail boxes at
City Hall.
This policy ratified by the City Council on the day of 1987.
MEMO TO: DEPARTMENT HEADS
SUBJECT: ACTION REQUEST FORMS
DATE: DECEMBER 29, 1983
The following policy will be effective as of January 1, 1984:
ACTION REQUEST POLICY
1. This policy will apply to the following types of communications:
A. Citizen Complaints/Requests
B. Council Requests
C. Council Directives
D. Councilmember Requests
E. Interdepartmental Suggestions/Recommendations
2. The ensuing procedure shall be followed by any City Employee upon receiving
any of the aforementioned types of communications:
A. The following information shall be recorded in writing on a standard
form provided by the Clerk's office:
1. Date, type and method of communication.
2. Name, address and telephone number of the person the communication
is received from.
3. Explanation of the communication.
B. The form shall be submitted to the Clerk's office, who shall file the
original in a permanent record book, and distribute copies to appro-
priate Department Heads.
C. The Department Heads shall take expedient action and submit a written
explanation along with reference materials as to the disposition of the
communication to the Clerk's office.
D. The completed form shall be substituted for the original form in the
permanent record book.
3. This policy is not intended to apply to trivial or inconsequential types of com-
munications. It should be noted, however, that any employee receiving any of the
types of communication covered under this policy will be held accountable for its
disposition if not recorded by the aforementioned procedure.
Larry o pson
City dministrato
LT/mh
A. ACTION REQUEST FORM
lA
COMMUNICATION RECEIVED: DATE
TYPE: COMPLAINT DIRECTIVE SUGGESTION OTHER
METHOD: IN PERSON PHONE LETTER MEMO OTHER
RECEIVED FROM:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
EXPLANATION: "1.-vs)voc,„v
REFERRED TO:
DATE:
THE FOLLOWING ACTION WAS TAKEN ON THE ABOVE COMMUNICATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
SIGNATURE
I r
• AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO.
NAME: Larry Thompson � >
DEPARTMENT: Administration
„>.4—+ -ft
DATE: April 21, 1989
MEETING DATE: May 1, 1989
CATEGORY: New Business
SUBJECT: Approve 1990 ALF Budget
EXPLANATION: Per ALF Joint Powers Agreement
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Budget/Memo - Larry Thompson
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Dan Siebenaler Police
Wayne Henneke Finance
Larry Thompson Administration
//1
SIGMA
A
L AMBULANCE
} F
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
Meeting Date: Origin: Agenda Item:
March 23, 1989 Kevin Raun 5-A
1. Board Action/Request:
To set the 1990 ALF Ambulance Budget.
2. Background/Summary Information:
Due to the ,new "Truth in Taxation" laws I am hereby presenting the
budget earlier this year. This should allow the (3) member cities
enough time to incorporate this budget in a timely manner for prepara-
tion and presentation of their own city budgets to their individual
city councils.
- Please See Attached Budget -
3. Budget Implications:
4. Staff Recommendation:
I am presenting only one budget proposal this year. The proposal is
to maintain the status quo with regard to staffing and hours of oper-
ation.
A
I M 0115 (C
14200 Cedar Avenue South
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
Phone — 612-432-5664
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALF Ambulance Operations Board
FROM: Kevin J. Raun, Ambulance Director
DATE: March 9, 1989
SUBJECT: ALF Ambulance 1990 Proposed Budget
Attached to this memo is the proposed budget for ALF Ambulance for the
1990 fiscal year. After just completing a little over two months of oper-
ations in 1989, it makes it a little difficult to accurately predict all
the needs of the ambulance service for the 1990 fiscal year. Taking this
into consideration, I believe the proposed budget will very closely cover
the needs of the ambulance service in its delivery of emergency medical
care to the citizens of our service area.
The hardest area to predict was do we need to increase the hours of opera-
tion for our second unit. This year has already started out fairly busy.
Each year of our three years of operational history we have expanded our
coverage level . There is certainly justification from our data to operate
the second unit sixteen hour days, but quite frankly we have not exper-
ienced enough call load between 11:00 p.m. to 7:0 a.m. to justify expanding
the second unit to twenty-four hour shifts. This also coincides with our
Five Year Plan which calls for operating the second unit sixteen hour days
in 1990. Therefore my 1990 proposed budget to you calls for maintaining
the status quo for fiscal year 1990 with regard to staffing and operational
hours of the units. The budget does take into account increased call load
for 1990 as it certainly appears that our numbers are not shrinking.
It continues to be my goal to ensure appropriate emergency medical services
coverage and response times to the citizens of our communities while main-
taining a fiscal responsibility to the overall operations of the ambulance
service.
I have some good news to report this budget year. At the close of 1989
ALF Ambulance will retire its bond debt. This debt was incurred in 1985
to purchase our first two ambulances and all equipment to get the service
started. The annual amount for this debt was $47,500.00. Because of our
equipment reserve (escrow) account the Board should never have to issue
any debt in the future.
•
. 1110
Another high note is the current cash reserves in the general fund. This
amount is just over $230,000.00. The interest on this cash reserve should
net the Board an additional $20,000.00 to $25,000.00 this year. I believe
the Board should look at capping the reserve cash at a predetermined level
and any future excesses could be rebated to the three member cities in the
form of lower operating subsidies. I present this item to the Board for
your discussion and action. The Board may want to look at using the
interest on investments as the escrow for the capital equipment reserve
account.
The following is a short synopsis of the proposed budget:
Salaries: I have budgeted 5% for cost of living/salary adjustments.
Due to a new pay plan for the Ambulance Supervisor this
increase has also been reflected.
Motor Fuels: Has an additional $750.00 added to cover an anticipated
increase in call volume for 1990 as well as the fact that
some economists are predicting higher prices for fuel .
Equipment/ Has an additional $500.00 added. This line item covers the
Parts: purchase of all vehicle parts (i .e., batteries, tires, etc.)
Audit: The audit for 1987 cost us $2,000.00 and this has been
adjusted to reflect true audit costs.
Collection Has an additional $2,900.00 budgeted. This item covers our
Services: billing services. We have a three year contract with fixed
billing rates, 1990 will be the start of our second contract
year. The increase reflects anticipated call volume.
This contract appears to be working quite well and if we
had remained with our prior billing contract conservative
estimates would have placed that at $5,000.00 more than
budgeted for 1990.
Insurance: Current fiscal year 1989 has our premium at $13,345 and we
were budgeted for $16, .000.00 The Board switched insurance
companies to the League of Minnesota Cities last year after
learning that our then current insurance company was asking
for a $10,000.00 increase for a total premium of over
$21,00.00. I have added only $500.00 this year over last
years budgeted amount as I feel we should be experiencing
some stability under the Leagues insurance coverage.
Contract Has an additional $1,000.00 added. This line item covers
Vehicle all contractual maintenance on the ambulances.
Repair:
Our vehicle maintenance policy is designed to be liberal .
Due to the critical service demand on these vehicles worn
or failing parts are replaced on an expedited service
schedule. We also have in place a time/mileage preventative
maintenance schedule.
2
406
•
Additions to This is our capital equipment budget. Monies to finance
Fixed Assets: these purchases come from our equipment reserve account.
There are two items I have listed for 1990:
1. Repower/Refurbish Medic Unit #11 - This unit had 76,000
miles on it at the end of fiscal year 1988. At the
rate of miles we are currently putting on this unit a
month. It is projected it will have approximately
110,000 miles on it by the end of 1989. Per our Five
Year Plan this unit is scheduled for a major overhaul
in 1990. I have budgeted $10,500.00 for this overhaul
which would consist of a brand new engine, rebuilt
transmission, new shocks, drive train and rear-end
overhaul , reupholster any torn or damaged seats and
squad benches, repaint exterior from belt line down,
and reletter the unit.
Obviously with a major overhaul of this type there may
be other miscellaneous items unforseen at this time.
At the units 75,000 mile tune-up and inspection the
mechanic advised the unit is in extremely good condi-
tion and the engine was very sound at that time. Even
though monies would be budgeted for 1990 the overhaul
would not occur until the condition of the unit made
it necessary. The mechanic advised that given the
units present condition its entirely possible that the
powertrain could give us 125,000 to 150,00 miles of
service. I would not allow the unit to be run into
the ground but, as long as its mechanically sound we
would continue to run it. I believe this repower to
be a viable and economically prudent course for this
unit.
The other alternative would be to rechassis the unit
(Remount the module on a new chassis) current prices
for new chassis and remounting are about $35,000.00 to
$40,000.00. The new engine would be warranted for two
years or 24,000 miles from Ford and the mechanic
advises that the unit should be able to obtain another
80,000 to 100,000 miles of service.
3
2. Office Furniture - The City of Apple Valley will be
constructing an addition to Fire Station #1 (our pre-
sent base of operations) and it appears ALF will be
occupying a major portion of the new space. It appears
the new quarters will need some furnishings that we
presently don't have. I have budgeted $2,000 to cover
the purchase of any necessary furniture for the new
quarters.
Per the Five Year Plan we were scheduled to purchase a
computer, typewriter and office furniture in the amount
of $9,700.00. This was due to the fact that we were
anticipating going to an in-house billing system, but
as has been noted previously, billing has been con-
tracted outside for the next three years.
The following is a list of facts and figures used in compiling the 1990
proposed budget:
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990
Projected Runs: 1158* 1356* 1558* 1476** 1570**
$ Rate Per Run: $ 241.32* $ 267.10* $ 268.86* $ 280.00** $ 280.00**
3 City Population: 48,970* 50,473* 57,523* 58,367** 60,059**
Proj. Svc. Billing: $273,381* $362,190* $417,334* $413,000** $439,600**
Township Revenue: $ 4,820* $ 5,100* $ 6,600* $ 6,000** $ 6,800**
Misc. Billings: $ 1,630* $ 10,432* $ 11,836* $ 7,500** $ 8,500**
* Actual Numbers
** Projected Numbers .
4
ALF AMBULANCE
1 9 8 9 & 1 9 9 0 BUDGET
ALF AMBULANCE
BALANCE SHEET
1987 1988 1989 1S90
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash 197.561 236,489 206, 145 215,279
Accounts receivable, net 84,537 119,949 131 ,944 145,138
Prepaid expenses 13,846 7,997 8,797 9,676
Total current assets $295,944 $364,435 $346,885 $370,093
Property, plant and equipment
Machinery + equipment $157,454 $241 ,554 $244,654 $257, 154
Less: accumulated depreciation (35,539) (53,839) (86,569) ( 120,069)
Net equipment $121 ,915 $187,715 $158,085 $137,085
Total assets $417,859 $552, 150 $504,970 $507,178
LIABILITIES AND RETAINED EARNINGS
Current liabilities
Accrued salaries $12,014 $10,395 $11 ,435 $12,578
Accounts Payable 10,866 9, 143 9,143 9,143
Accrued interest payable 1 ,013 1 ,341
Bonds payable-current 47,500 47,500
Total current liabilities $71 ,393 $68,379 $20,578 $21 ,721
Long-term liabilities
Bonds Payable $.7.500
Retained earnings
Designated 28,301 61 ,688 94,728 129,896
Undesignated 270,665 422,084 389,665 355,562
Total retained earnings $298,966 $483,771 $484,393 $485,457
Total $411 ,859 $552, 150 $504,970 $507. 178
ALF AMBULANCE
STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSE
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Revenues
City support $189,787 $170,433 $160,509 $150, 148
Township support 5, 100 6,600 6,000 6,800
Service billings 362,784 417,334 413,000 439,600
Less Medicare/Medicaid ( 18,837) ( 15,488) (16,485)
Miscellaneous 12,373 11 ,836 7,500 8,500
Interest 4,608 12,942 2,875 23,500
Total revenues $574,652 $600,308 $574,396 $612,063
Expense
Salaries full-time $215, 189 $236,089 $323,482 $356,837
PERA 8,637 10,055 13,748 15, 166
FICA 14,914 17,767 24,488 26,798
Hospitalization 12,540 13,959 29,700 29,700
Workmans Comp 13,814 14,293 26,202 16,097
Office supplies 553 357 1 ,000 1 ,000
Operating Supplies 1 , 181 1 ,690 1,000 1 ,500
Motor fuels 5,741 6,652 8,750 9,500
Lubricants 0 64 500 500
Clothing 1,311 2,765 3,000 3,500
Oxygen 385 357 445 575
Equipment parts 1,648 1,613 2,500 3,000
Medical supplies 3,915 5, 158 6,600 7, 100
Audit 0 0 600 1 ,200
Collection services 15,707 18,560 17,000 19,900
Professional services 2,571 2,294 1 ,600 1 ,100
Use of personal auto 553 552 500 650
Print public information 136 35 220 220
Promotions 1,244 97 685 700
Insurance 11 , 185 12,050 16,000 16,500
Postage 0 0 100 100
Telephone 1 ,310 1 ,504 • 2,400 2,600
Contract equip repair 53 401 500 700
Contract radio repair 705 588 1 ,400 1 ,500
Contract vehicle repair 3,024 4,421 5,500 6,500
Contract linen 567 378 750 800
Data processing 308 485 250 600
Schools + conferences 1,074 947 2,200 2,400
Dues + subscriptions 317 851 500 950
Licenses and taxes 192 75 350 350
Uncollectible accounts 39.795 37.428 46.462 49.455
Interest expense 8,357 5,718 2,613 0
Depreciation 17,790 18,300 32,730 33,500
Total expense $384,721 $415,503 $573,775 $610,998
Net increase/(dec. ) $189,931 $184,805 $622 $1 ,064
ALF AMBULANCE
WORKING CAPITAL
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Current assets
Cash $197,561 $236,489 $206, 145 $215,279
Accounts receivable, net 84,537 119,949 131 ,944 145, 138
Prepaid expenses 13,846 7,997 8,797 9,676
Total current assets $295,944 $364,435 $346,885 $370,093
Current liabilities
Accrued salaries $12,014 $10,395 $11 ,435 $12,578
Accounts payable 10,866 9,143 9,143 9, 143
Accrued interest payable 1 ,013 1 ,341 0 0
Bonds payable-current 47,500 47,500 0 0
Total current liabilities $71,393 $68,379 $20,578 $21 ,721
Total working capital $224,551 $296,056 $326,308 $348,372
CHANGES IN WORKING CAPITAL
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Funds provided
Net income $189,931 $184,805 $622 $1 ,064
Depreciation 17,790 18,300 32,730 33,500
Total funds prcvidea $207,721 $203, 105 $33,352 $34,564
Funds applied
Additions to fixed assets $3,201 $84,100 $3, 100 $12,500
Debt retirement 47,500 47,500
Total funds applied $50,701 $131 ,600 $3, 1C0 $12 .500
Net increase/(decrease) in working capital $157,020 $71,505 $30,252 $22,064
Working capital , January 1 67,531 224,551 296,056 326,308
Working capital , December 31 $224,551 $296,056 $326,308 $348,372
BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS -
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
POPULATION
Apple Valley 28,538 29,109 32,309 33,278
Lakeville 17,865 18,222 20,783 21 ,406
Farmington 5,010 5, 110 5,275 5,375
Total population 51 ,413 52,441 58,367 60,059
PER CAPITA COST $3.69 $3.25 $2.75 $2.50
COST PER CITY
Apple Valley $105,346 $94,604 $88,850 $83, 195
Lakeville 65,947 59,222 57,153 53,515
Farmington 18,494 16,608 14,506 13,438
$189,787 $170,433 $160,509 $150,148
SERVICE BILLINGS
Total transports 1 ,357 1 ,356 1 ,475 1 ,570
Average revenue per call $269 $275 $280 $280
Total service billings $365,033 $372,900 $413,000 $439,600
SERVICE BILLINGS
For operations 334,005 341 ,204 379,960 404,432
Designated for future equipment replacement 31 ,028 31 ,697 33,040 35, 168
$365,033 $372,900 $413,000 $439,600
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
New Ambulance
Chassis $22,000
Module 40,000
Telecommunications equipment
Radios/telephone 6,500
Portable radios (2) 2,400
Pagers (2) 700
Defibrillation/monitor
Life Pak 5 8,500
Refurbish/Repower Medic #11 10,500
New engine, rebuilt frame
Interior/exterior refurbish
Miscellaneous equipment for new ambulance
Equipment 7,100
Office Furniture
Misc. furniture for new quarters 2,000
TOTAL ACQUISITION OF EQUIPMENT $0 $84,100 $3,100 $12,500
A
•
• A.L.F. AMBULANCE OPERATING BOARD
CITIES OF APPLE VALLEY, LAKEVILLE AND FARMINGTON
MINUTES
February 23, 1989
PRESENT: Chair Holton, Boardmembers Sindt and McKnight, Assistant
Administrator Lawell , Personnel Director Boland, Supervisor
McCauley, and Ambulance Director Raun.
ABSENT: None.
Chairman Holton called the meeting to order at 6:00 o'clock p.m.
MOTION: of Sindt, seconded by Holton, to approve the MINUTES OF
minutes of December 15, 1988. McKnight's DEC. 15, 1988
vote withheld due to no prior meeting as a
Boardmember. Ayes - 2 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Sindt, seconded by McKnight to amend the agenda AGENDA
by adding new items 8-B, Star of the North Games,
and removing from the Consent Calendar Item 5-E, 1989/1990
Township Agreements and Item 6-C, December P & L Statement
allowing for discussion. Ayes - 3 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Sindt, seconded by McKnight to approve Consent CONSENT
Calendar: CALENDAR
1. Review Township Invoices.
2. Resolution #89-01, Acceptance of Donation.
3. Accept Resignation of Part-time Paramedic.
4. Removal of Employee's from Probationary
Status.
5. December/January Data Reports.
6. December/January A/R Reports.
7. Fourth Quarter Vehicle Reports.
Ayes - 3 - Nays - 0.
Boland offered union update to McKnight. Labor agreements were LABOR
handed out as proposed by ALF and union. UNION
- ALF proposal reviewed per Boland. Per Raun, delete Section 14-12.
Difficulty with having personnel out on comp time. Per Raun, salary
survey is completed. Per Lawell , our employees are non-essential
employees but they do have the right to strike.
ALF Ambulance Operating Board
Minutes of February 23, 1989
Page 2
- Union proposal reviewed. Per Raun, discussed viability of shift lead
position. Cost-out sheet handed out by Boland. Per Holton, salary
request not a reality at a 50% increase. Holton requests meeting
with Raun and Boland the week before March 21st. Holton will then
advise the rest of the boardmembers'. Next negotiation meeting between
ALF and union is scheduled for March 21, 1989. Per Boland, this
meeting will consist of contract language only.
Supervisor pay scale cost-out offered by Boland and Raun. Per SUPERVISOR
Raun, supervisor salary increase was slated for January 1, 1989 SALARY
but delayed due to union activity. Per Raun, McCauley would be at
2 year level .
MOTION: of Sindt, seconded by McKnight to move McCauley to proposed
1989 2 year supervisor salary level , retroactive to January
1, 1989. Ayes - 3 - Nays - 0.
Per Lawell , background offered .on Ambulance Director's comp time. Resolu-
tion reviewed. Per Sindt, delete a.,b. ,c. of resolution and use statements
1 and 2.
Per Raun, if at the end of calendar year the amount of comp time exceeded
80 hours, the amount over 80 hours would be deleted. Per Lawell buyout of
hours would occur the first year only. Per Holton, request for paragraph
for action for current hours. As of January 1, 1990 comp time hours earned
in excess of 80 hours would be deleted.
MOTION: By Sindt, seconded by McKnight to approve DIRECTOR'S
Ambulance Director's Comp Time proposal with COMP TIME
above amendments. Ayes - 3 - Nays - 0.
Per Raun, agreements for the provision of ambulance service for 1989/1990
the Townships of Castle Rock, Eureka and Empire are ready to be TOWNSHIP
signed and sent. Castle Rock has not made payment as of yet. AGREEMENTS
Per Raun, requests board members to take home and review 1988 ALF 1988
Annual Report. Forwarding comments to Raun. Per Sindt, on Board- ANNUAL
members letter, no mention of second rig going to 16 hour shifts REPORT
in 1989.
Per Raun, discussion of ALF Comparative Balance Sheet. Per DECEMBER
Raun, $235,000.00 in general fund. $200,000 in 4M gaining in- P & L
terest at 9 1/2%. Per Raun auditors request documentation on STATEMENT
write-offs for Medicare and Medicaid patients. Per Raun, will have
report in the annual report.
. ti
•
ALF Ambulance Operating Board
Minutes of February 23, 1989
Page 3
Raun discussed with the Board that our collection 1988 COLLECTION
service now utilizes optional collection letters to ANALYSIS -
clients. We are currently experimenting with (5) ALLIED INTERSTATE
free account letters to see if this program would be
viable. There is a charge for this service. Raun will report back.
Tammi doing well with billing procedures. Few bugs with software but
easily corrected. 31% with Allied Collection.
Per Raun, attorneys checking into difficulty of ALF AND APPLE VALLEY
reimbursements from Medicare/Medicaid. Will advise CLINIC MEDICARE/
of possibilities for reimbursement. MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENTS
Per Raun, reviewed Blood Alcohol Draw program. Request BLOOD ALCOHOL
for purchase of in-house VCR with monies collected. DRAWS
MOTION: of Sindt, seconded by McKnight to purchase VCR.
Ayes - 3 - Nays 0.
Per Raun, brief synopsis of Star of the North Games offered. STAR OF
Schedule of events handed out with highlights of games in our NORTH GAMES
area. Request to staff 3 ambulances during weekends due to
possibility of increased call volume.
MOTION: By Sindt, seconded by McKnight to staff 3 ambulances
during Star of North Games in our area. Ayes - 3 -
Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Sindt, seconded by McKnight to adjourn ADJOURN
7:40 o'clock p.m. Ayes - 3 - Nays - 0.
•
A
fflguLthi .
14200 Cedar Avenue South
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
Phone — 612-432-5664
MEMORANDA
TO: ALF Ambulance Operations Board
FROM: Kevin J. Raun, Ambulance Director
DATE: March 9, 1989
SUBJECT: ALF Ambulance 1990 Proposed Budget
Attached to this memo is the proposed budget for ALF Ambulance for the
1990 fiscal year. After just completing a little over two months of oper-
ations in 1989, it makes it a little difficult to accurately predict all
the needs of the ambulance service for the 1990 fiscal year. Taking this
into consideration, I believe the proposed budget will very closely cover
the needs of the ambulance service in its delivery of emergency medical
care to the citizens of our service area.
The hardest area to predict was do we need to increase the hours of opera-
tion for our second unit. This year has already started out fairly busy.
Each year of our three years of operational history we have expanded our
coverage level . There is certainly justification from our data to operate
the second unit sixteen hour days, but quite frankly we have not exper-
ienced enough call load between 11:00 p.m. to 7:0 a.m. to justify expanding
the second unit to twenty-four hour shifts. This also coincides with our
Five Year Plan which calls for operating the second unit sixteen hour days
in 1990. Therefore my 1990 proposed budget to you calls for maintaining
the status quo for fiscal year 1990 with regard to staffing and operational
hours of the units. The budget does take into account increased call load
for 1990 as it certainly appears that our numbers are not shrinking.
It continues to be my goal to ensure appropriate emergency medical services
coverage and response times to the citizens of our communities while main-
taining a fiscal responsibility to the overall operations of the ambulance
service.
I have some good news to report this budget year. At the close of 1989
ALF Ambulance will retire its bond debt. This debt was incurred in 1985
to purchase our first two ambulances and all equipment to get the service
started. The annual amount for this debt was $47,500.00. Because of our
equipment reserve (escrow) account the Board should never have to issue
any debt in the future.
Another high note is the current cash reserves in the general fund. This
amount is just over $230,000.00. The interest on this cash reserve should
net the Board an additional $20,000.00 to $25,000.00 this year. I believe
the Board should look at capping the reserve cash at a predetermined level
and any future excesses could be rebated to the three member cities in the
form of lower operating subsidies. I present this item to the Board for
your discussion and action. The Board may want to look at using the
interest on investments as the escrow for the capital equipment reserve
account.
The following is a short synopsis of the proposed budget:
Salaries: I have budgeted 5% for cost of living/salary adjustments.
Due to a new pay plan for the Ambulance Supervisor this
increase has also been reflected.
Motor Fuels: Has an additional $750.00 added to cover an anticipated
increase in call volume for 1990 as well as the fact that
some economists are predicting higher prices for fuel .
Equipment/ Has an additional $500.00 added. This line item covers the
Parts: purchase of all vehicle parts (i .e. , batteries, tires, etc.)
Audit: The audit for 1987 cost us $2,000.00 and this has been
adjusted to reflect true audit costs.
Collection Has an additional $2,900.00 budgeted. This item covers our
Services: billing services. We have a three year contract with fixed
billing rates, 1990 will be the start of our second contract
year. The increase reflects anticipated call volume.
This contract appears to be working quite well and if we
had remained with our prior billing contract conservative
estimates would have placed that at $5,000.00 more than
budgeted for 1990.
Insurance: Current fiscal year 1989 has our premium at $13,345 and we
were budgeted for $16, .000.00 The Board switched insurance
companies to the League of Minnesota Cities last year after
learning that our then current insurance company was asking
for a $10,000.00 increase for a total premium of over
$21,00.00. I have added only $500.00 this year over last
years budgeted amount as I feel we should be experiencing
some stability under the Leagues insurance coverage.
Contract Has an additional $1,000.00 added. This line item covers
Vehicle all contractual maintenance on the ambulances.
Repair:
Our vehicle maintenance policy is designed to be liberal .
Due to the critical service demand on these vehicles worn
or failing parts are replaced on an expedited service
schedule. We also have in place a time/mileage preventative
maintenance schedule.
2
Additions to This is our capital equipment budget. Monies to finance
Fixed Assets: these purchases come from our equipment reserve account.
There are two items I have listed for 1990:
1. Repower/Refurbish Medic Unit #11 - This unit had 76,000
miles on it at the end of fiscal year 1988. At the
rate of miles we are currently putting on this unit a
month. It is projected it will have approximately
110,000 miles on it by the end of 1989. Per our Five
Year Plan this unit is scheduled for a major overhaul
in 1990. I have budgeted $10,500.00 for this overhaul
which would consist of a brand new engine, rebuilt
transmission, new shocks, drive train and rear-end
overhaul , reupholster any torn or damaged seats and
squad benches, repaint exterior from belt line down,
and reletter the unit.
Obviously with a major overhaul of this type there may
be other miscellaneous items unforseen at this time.
At the units 75,000 mile tune-up and inspection the
mechanic advised the unit is in extremely good condi-
tion and the engine was very sound at that time. Even
though monies would be budgeted for 1990 the overhaul
would not occur until the condition of the unit made
it necessary. The mechanic advised that given the
units present condition its entirely possible that the
powertrain could give us 125,000 to 150,00 miles of
service. I would not allow the unit to be run into
the ground but, as long as its mechanically sound we
would continue to run it. I believe this repower to
be a viable and economically prudent course for this
unit.
The other alternative would be to rechassis the unit
(Remount the module on a new chassis) current prices
for new chassis and remounting are about $35,000.00 to
$40,000.00. The new engine would be warranted for two
years or 24,000 miles from Ford and the mechanic
advises that the unit should be able to obtain another
80,000 to 100,000 miles of service.
3
- w r
2. Office Furniture - The City of Apple Valley will be
constructing an addition to Fire Station #1 (our pre-
sent base of operations) and it appears ALF will be
occupying a major portion of the new space. It appears
the new quarters will need some furnishings that we
presently don't have. I have budgeted $2,000 to cover
the purchase of any necessary furniture for the new
quarters.
Per the Five Year Plan we were scheduled to purchase a
computer, typewriter and office furniture in the amount
of $9,700.00. This was due to the fact that we were
anticipating going to an in-house billing system, but
as has been noted previously, billing has been con-
tracted outside for the next three years.
The following is a list of facts and figures used in compiling the 1990
proposed budget:
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990
Projected Runs: 1158* 1356* 1558* 1476** 1570**
$ Rate Per Run: $ 241.32* $ 267.10* $ 268.86* $ 280.00** $ 280.00**
3 City Population: 48,970* 50,473* 57,523* 58,367** 60,059**
Proj . Svc. Billing: $273,381* $362,190* $417,334* $413,000** $439,600**
is Township Revenue: $ 4,820* $ 5,100* $ 6,600* $ 6,000** $ 6,800**
Misc. Billings: $ 1,630* $ 10,432* $ 11,836* $ 7,500** $ 8,500**
* Actual Numbers
** Projected Numbers .
4
ALF AMBULANCE
1 9 8 9 & 1 9 9 0 BUDGET
ALF AMBULANCE
BALANCE SHEET
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash 197.561 236,489 206, 145 215,279
Accounts receivable, net 84,537 119,949 131 ,944 145,138
Prepaid expenses 13,846 7,997 8,797 9.676
Total current assets $295,944 $364,435 $346,885 $370,093
Property, plant and equipment
Machinery + equipment $157,454 $241,554 $244,654 $257, 154
Less: accumulated depreciation (35,539) (53,839) (86,569) (120,069)
Net equipment $121,915 $187,715 $158,085 $137,085
Total assets $417,859 $552, 150 $504,970 $507, 178
LIABILITIES AND RETAINED EARNINGS
Current liabilities
Accrued salaries $12,014 $10,395 $11 ,435 $12,578
Accounts Payable 10,866 9, 143 9,143 9,143
Accrued interest payable 1,013 1 ,341
Bonds payable-current 47,500 47,500
Total current liabilities $71 ,393 $68,379 $20,578 $21 ,721
Long-term liabilities
Bonds Payable $,17,500
Retained earnings
Designated 28,301 61 ,688 94,728 129,896
Undesignated 270,665 422,084 389,665 355,562
Total retained earnings $298,966 $483,771 $484,393 $485.457
Total $417,859 $552, 150 $504,970 $507. 178
•
r
ALF AMBULANCE
STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSE
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Revenues
City support $189,787 $170,433 $160,509 $150, 148
Township support 5, 100 6,600 6,000 6,800
Service billings 362,784 417,334 413,000 439,600
Less Medicare/Medicaid ( 18,837) ( 15,488) (16,485)
Miscellaneous 12,373 11 ,836 7,500 8,500
Interest 4,608 12,942 2,875 23,500
Total revenues $574,652 $600,308 $574,396 $612,063
Expense
Salaries full-time $215, 189 $236,089 $323,482 $356,837
PERA 8,637 10,055 13,748 15, 166
FICA 14,914 17,767 24,488 26,798
Hospitalization 12,540 13,959 29,700 29,700
Workmans Comp 13,814 14,293 26,202 16,097
Office supplies 553 357 1 ,000 1 ,000
Operating Supplies 1, 181 1 ,690 1 ,000 1 ,500
Motor fuels 5,741 6,652 8,750 9,500
Lubricants 0 64 500 500
Clothing 1 ,311 2,765 3,000 3,500
Oxygen 385 357 445 575
Equipment parts 1 ,648 1 ,613 2,500 3,000
Medical supplies 3,915 5, 158 6,600 7, 100
Audit 0 0 600 1 ,200
Collection services 15,707 18,560 17,000 19,900
Professional services 2,571 2,294 1 ,600 1 ,100
Use of personal auto 553 552 500 650
Print public information 136 35 220 220
Promotions 1 ,244 97 685 700
Insurance 11 ,185 12,050 16,000 16,500
Postage 0 0 100 100
Telephone 1 ,310 1 ,504 2,400 2,600
Contract equip repair 58 401 500 700
Contract radio repair 705 588 1 ,400 1 ,500
Contract vehicle repair 3,024 4,421 5,500 6,500
Contract linen 567 378 750 800
Data processing 308 485 250 600
Schools + conferences 1 ,074 947 2,200 2,400
Dues + subscriptions 317 851 500 950
Licenses and taxes 192 75 3E0 350
Uncollectible accounts 39.795 37.428 48.42 49.455
Interest expense 8,357 5,718 2,613 0
Depreciation 17,790 18,300 32,730 33,500
Total expense $384,721 $415,503 $573,775 $610,998
Net increase/(dec. ) $189,931 $184,805 $622 $1 ,064
,
ALF AMBULANCE
WORKING CAPITAL
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Current assets
Cash $197,561 $236,489 $206, 145 $215,279
Accounts receivable, net 84,537 119,949 131 ,944 145, 138
Prepaid expenses 13,846 7,997 8,797 9,676
Total current assets $295,944 $364,435 $346,885 $370,093
Current liabilities
Accrued salaries $12,014 $10,395 $11 ,435 $12,578
Accounts payable 10,866 9,143 9,143 9, 143
Accrued interest payable 1 ,013 1 ,341 0 0
Bonds payable-current 47,500 47,500 0 0
Total current liabilities $71 ,393 $68,379 $20,578 $21 ,721
Total working capital $224,551 $296,056 $326,308 $348,372
CHANGES IN WORKING CAPITAL
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Funds provided
Net income $189,931 $184,805 $622 $1 ,064
Depreciation 17,790 18,300 32,730 33,500
Total funds provided $207,721 $203, 105 $33,352 $34,564
Funds applied
Additions to fixed assets $3,201 $84, 100 $3,100 $12,500
Debt retirement 47,500 47,500
Total funds applied $50,701 $131 ,600 $3. 160 $12.500
Net increase/(decrease) in working capital $157,020 $71 ,505 $30,252 $22,064
Working capital , January 1 67,531 224,551 296,056 326,308
Working capital , December 31 $224,551 $296,056 $326,308 $348,372
.
4
BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS -
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
POPULATION
Apple Valley 28,538 29,109 32,309 33,278
Lakeville 17,865 18,222 20,783 21 ,406
Farmington 5,010 5, 110 5,275 5,375
Total population 51 ,413 52,441 58,367 60,059
PER CAPITA COST $3.69 $3.25 $2.75 $2.50
COST PER CITY
Apple Valley $105,346 $94,604 $88,850 $83, 195
Lakeville 65,947 59,222 57,153 53,515
Farmington 18,494 16,608 14,506 13,438
$189,787 $170,433 $160,509 $150, 148
SERVICE BILLINGS
Total transports 1 ,357 1,356 1 ,475 1 ,570
Average revenue per call $269 $275 $280 $280
Total service billings $365,033 $372,900 $413,000 $439,600
SERVICE BILLINGS
For operations 334,005 341 ,204 379,960 404,432
Designated for future equipment replacement 31 ,028 31 ,697 33,040 35, 168
$365,033 $372,900 $413,000 $4. 9,600
£ i
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
New Ambulance
Chassis $22,000
Module 40,000
Telecommunications equipment
Radios/telephone 6,500
Portable radios (2) 2,400
Pagers (2) 700
Defibrillation/monitor
Life Pak 5 8,500
Refurbish/Repower Medic #11 10,500
New engine, rebuilt frame
Interior/exterior refurbish
Miscellaneous equipment for new ambulance
Equipment 7,100
Office Furniture
Misc. furniture for new quarters 2,000
TOTAL ACQUISITION OF EQUIPMENT $0 $84,100 $3,100 $12,500
•
A
A A. C E
BP
14200 Cedar Avenue South
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
Phone — 612-432-5664
ALF AMBULANCE
1990 PROPOSED BUDGET
To the Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
Attached to this letter is the proposed budget for ALF Ambulance for
the 1990 fiscal year. Per the three City Ambulance Joint Powers Agreement
the ALF Ambulance Board has reviewed, and are hereby recommending for
approval by the three City Councils the attached budget proposal .
It is the Boards goal for fiscal year 1990 to see ALF Ambulance con-
tinue to deliver high quality emergency medical services to the citizens
in the ambulance service area. We will strive to improve our service
where ever and when ever it is possible.
The following is a short synopsis of the budget proposal :
The Board has opted to maintain the same coverage level for fiscal
year 1990 as the current year 1989. That coverage consists of one
unit being operated twenty-four hours, with the other unit being
operated sixteen hour days (0700-2300 hours). This is proving to
adequately cover our service area as the call volume during the hours
of 2300 - 0700 is just not that busy. The budget does reflect a
heavier call load for 1990 as the numbers appear as though they will
continue to increase.
Salaries: I have budgeted 5% for cost of living/salary, adjustments.
Due to a new pay plan for the Ambulance Supervisor this
increase has also been reflected.
Motor Fuels: Has an additional $750.00 added to cover an anticipated
increase in call volume for 1990 as well as the fact that
some economists are predicting higher prices for fuel .
Equipment/ Has an additional $500.00 added. This line item covers the
Parts: purchase of all vehicle parts (i .e. , batteries, tires, etc.)
Audit: The audit for 1987 cost us $2,000.00 and this has been
adjusted to reflect true audit costs.
Collection Has an additional $2,900.00 budgeted. This item covers our
Services: billing services. We have a three year contract with fixed
billing rates, 1990 will be the start of our second contract
year. The increase reflects anticipated call volume. This
contract appears to be working quite well and if we had
remained estiwith u
mateswouldhavr �
eplacedor lthacontract
tat $5,000.00emore�than
budgeted for 1990.
Page 2
Insurance: Current fiscal year 1989 has our premium at $13,345 and we
were budgeted for $16,000.00. The Board switched insurance
companies to the League of Minnesota Cities lastY ear after
learning that our then current insurance company was asking
for a $10,000.00 increase for a total premium of over
$21,000.00. I have added only $500.00 this year over last
years budgeted amount as I feel we should be experiencing
some stability under the Leagues insurance coverage.
Contract Has an additional $2,000 budgeted. This line item covers
Vehicle all contractual maintenance of the ambulances.
Repair:
Our vehicle maintenance policy is designed to be liberal .
Due to the critical service demand placed on these vehicles
worn or failing parts are replaced on an expedited service
schedule. We also have in place a time/mileage preventative
maintenance schedule.
Additions to This is our capital equipment budget. Monies to finance
Fixed Assets: these purchases come from our equipment reserve account.
There are two items I have listed for 1990:
1. Repower/Refurbish Medic Unit #11 - THis unit had 76,000
miles on it at the end of fiscal year 1988. At the
rate of miles we are currently putting on this unit a
A month. It is projected it will have approximately
110,000 miles on it by the end of 1989. Per our Five
Year Plan this unit is scheduled for a major overhaul
in 1990. I have budgeted $10,500.00 for this overhaul
which would consist of a brand new engine, rebuilt
transmission, new shocks, drive train and rear-end
overhaul , reupholster any torn or damaged seats and
squad benches, repaint exterior from belt line down,
and reletter the unit.
Obviously with a major overhaul of this type there may
be other miscellaneous items unforseen at this time.
At the units 75,000 mile tune-up and inspection the
mechanic advised the unit is in extremely good condi-
tion and the engine was very sound at that time. Even
though monies would be budgeted for 1990 the overhaul
would not occur until the condition of the unit made
it necessary. The mechanic advised that given the
units present condition its entirely possible that the
powertrain could give us 125,000 to 150,000 miles of
service. I would not allow the unit to be run into
the ground but, as long as its mechanically sound we
would continue to run it. I believe this repower to
be a viable and economically prudent course for this
unit.
•
•
•
Page 3
The other alternative would be to rechassis the unit
(Remount the module on a new chassis) current prices
for new chassis and remounting are about $35,000.00 to
$40,000.00. The new engine would be warranted for two
years or 24,000 miles from Ford and the mechanic
advises that the unit should be able to obtain another
80,000 to 100,000 miles of service.
2. Office Furniture - The City of Apple Valley will be
constructing an addition to Fire Station #1 (our pre-
sent base of operations) and it appears ALF will be
occupying a major portion of the new space. It appears
the new quarters will need some furnishings that we
presently don't have. I have budgeted $2,000 to cover
the purchase of any necessary furniture for the new
quarters.
Per the Five Year Plan we were scheduled to purchase a
computer, typewriter and office furniture in the amount
of $9,700.00. This was due to the fact that we were
anticipating going to an in-house billing system, but
as has been noted previously, billing has been con-
tracted outside for the next three years.
This basically sums up the 1990 budget. If any Council member should
have any questions or require more information please feel free to contact
me.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin J. Rau
Ambulance Director
KJR/eh
Attachment: 1990 proposed budget
• At 17E 74, NcE
•
14200 Cedar Avenue South
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
Phone — 612-432-5664
ALF AMBULANCE
1990 PROPOSED BUDGET
To the Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
Attached to this letter is the proposed budget for ALF Ambulance for
the 1990 fiscal year. Per the three City Ambulance Joint Powers Agreement
the ALF Ambulance Board has reviewed, and are hereby recommending for
approval by the three City Councils the attached budget proposal .
It is the Boards goal for fiscal year 1990 to see ALF Ambulance con-
tinue to deliver high quality emergency medical services to the citizens
in the ambulance service area. We will strive to improve our service
where ever and when ever it is possible.
The following is a short synopsis of the budget proposal :
The Board has opted to maintain the same coverage level for fiscal
year 1990 as the current year 1989. That coverage consists of one
unit being operated twenty-four hours, with the other unit being
operated sixteen hour days (0700-2300 hours) . This is proving to
adequately cover our service area as the call volume during the hours
of 2300 - 0700 is just not that busy. The budget does reflect a
heavier call load for 1990 as the numbers appear as though they will
continue to increase.
Salaries: I have budgeted 5% for cost of living/salary adjustments.
Due to a new pay plan for the Ambulance Supervisor this
increase has also been reflected.
Motor Fuels: Has an additional $750.00 added to cover an anticipated
increase in call volume for 1990 as well as the fact that
some economists are predicting higher prices for fuel .
Equipment/ Has an additional $500.00 added. This line item covers the
Parts: purchase of all vehicle parts (i .e. , batteries, tires, etc. )
Audit: The audit for 1987 cost us $2,000.00 and this has been
adjusted to reflect true audit costs.
Collection Has an additional $2,900.00 budgeted. This item covers our
Services: _ billing services. We have a three year contract with fixed
billing rates, 1990 will be the start of our second contract
year. The increase reflects anticipated call volume. This
contract appears to be working quite well and if we had
remained with our prior billing contract conservative
estimates would have placed that at $5,000.00 more than
budgeted for 1990.
. , .
Page 2
Insurance: Current fiscal year 1989 has our premium at $13,345 and we
were budgeted for $16,000.00. The Board switched insurance
companies to the League of Minnesota Cities last year after
learning that our then current insurance company was asking
for a $10,000.00 increase for a total premium of over
$21,000.00. I have added only $500.00 this year over last
years budgeted amount as I feel we should be experiencing
some stability under the Leagues insurance coverage.
Contract Has an additional $2,000 budgeted. This line item covers
Vehicle all contractual maintenance of the ambulances.
Repair:
Our vehicle maintenance policy is designed to be liberal .
Due to the critical service demand placed on these vehicles
worn or failing parts are replaced on an expedited service
schedule. We also have in place a time/mileage preventative
maintenance schedule.
Additions to This is our capital equipment budget. Monies to finance
Fixed Assets:• these purchases come from our equipment reserve account.
There are two items I have listed for 1990:
1. Repower/Refurbish Medic Unit #11 - THis unit had 76,000
miles on it at the end of fiscal year 1988. At the
rate of miles we are currently putting on this unit a
month. It is projected it will have approximately
110,000 miles on it by the end of 1989. Per our Five
Year Plan this unit is scheduled for a major overhaul
in 1990. I have budgeted $10,500.00 for this overhaul
which would consist of a brand new engine, rebuilt
transmission, new shocks, drive train and rear-end
overhaul , reupholster any torn or damaged seats and
squad benches, repaint exterior from belt line down,
and reletter the unit.
Obviously with a major overhaul of this type there may
be other miscellaneous items unforseen at this time.
At the units 75,000 mile tune-up and inspection the
mechanic advised the unit is in extremely good condi-
tion and the engine was very sound at that time. Even
though monies would be budgeted for 1990 the overhaul
would not occur until the condition of the unit made
it necessary. The mechanic advised that given the
units present condition its entirely possible that the
powertrain could give us 125,000 to 150,000 miles of
service. I would not allow the unit to be run into
the ground but, as long as its mechanically sound we
would continue to run it. I believe this repower to
be a viable and economically prudent course for this
unit.
-+46 ..4. '
•
Page 3
The other alternative would be to rechassis the unit
• (Remount the module on a new chassis) current prices
for new chassis and remounting are about $35,000.00 to
$40,000.00. The new engine would be warranted for two
years or 24,000 miles from Ford and the mechanic
advises that the unit should be able to obtain another
80,000 to 100,000 miles of service.
2. Office Furniture - The City of Apple Valley will be
constructing an addition to Fire Station #1 (our pre-
sent base of operations) and it appears ALF will be
occupying a major portion of the new space. It appears
the new quarters will need some furnishings that we
presently don't have. I have budgeted $2,000 to cover
the purchase of any necessary furniture for the new
quarters.
Per the Five Year Plan we were scheduled to purchase a
computer, typewriter and office furniture in the amount
of $9,700.00. This was due to the fact that we were
anticipating going to an in-house billing system, but
as has been noted previously, billing has been con-
tracted outside for the next three years.
This basically sums up the 1990 budget. If any Council member should
have any questions or require more information please feel free to contact
me.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin J. Raiun
Ambulance Director
KJR/eh
Attachment: 1990 proposed budget
F
- •
ALF AMBULANCE
1 9 8 9 & 1 9 9 0 BUDGET
0
ALF AMBULANCE
BALANCE SHEET
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash 197.561 236,489 206,145 215.279
Accounts receivable, net 84,537 119,949 131,944 145, 138
Prepaid expenses 13,846 7,997 8,797 9.676
Total current assets $295,944 $364,435 $346,885 $370,093
Property, plant and equipment
Machinery + equipment $157,454 $241,554 $244,654 $257, 154
Less: accumulated depreciation (35,539) (53,839) (86,569) (120,069)
Net equipment $121,915 $187,715 $158,085 $137,085
Total assets $417,859 $552,150 $504,970 $507,178
00 LIABILITIES AND RETAINED EARNINGS
Current liabilities
Accrued salaries $12,014 $10,395 $11,435 $12,578
Accounts Payable 10,866 9, 143 9,143 9,143
Accrued interest payable 1,013 1,341
Bonds payable-current 47,500 47,500
Total current liabilities $71,393 $68,379 $20,578 $21 ,721
Long-tern liabilities
Bonds Payable $47,500
Retained earnings
Designated 28,301 61,688 94,728 129,896
Undesignated 270,665 422,084 389,665 355,562
Total retained earnings $298,966 $483,771 $484,393 $485,457
Total $417,859 $552, 150 $504,970$,,04,9ru $ 07, 178
•
.
ALF AMBULANCE
S T A TEME N T OF REVENUES AND EXPENSE
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Revenues •
City support $189,787 $170,433 $160,509 $150, 148
Township support 5,100 6,600 6,000 6,800
Service billings 362,784 417,334 413.000 439,600
Less Medicare/Medicaid (18,837) (15,488) (16,485)
Miscellaneous 12,373 11,836 7,500 8,500
Interest 4,608 12,942 2,875 23,500
Total revenues $574,652 $600,308 $574,396 $612,063
Expense
Salaries full-time $215,189 $236,089 $323,482 $356,837
PERA 8,637 10,055 13,748 15,166
FICA 14,914 17,767 24,488 26,798
Hospitalization 12,540 13,959 29,700 29,700
Workmans Comp 13,814 14,293 26,202 16,097
Office supplies 553 357 1,000 1,000
Operating Supplies 1,181 1,690 1,000 1,500
Motor fuels 5,741 6,652 8,750 9,500
Lubricants 0 64 500 500
Clothing 1,311 2,765 3,000 3,500
Oxygen 385 357 445 575
Equipment parts 1,648 1,613 2,500 3,000
Medical supplies3,915 5,158 6,600 7,100
Audit 0 0 600 1,200
Collection services 15,707 18,560 17,000 19,900
Professional services 2,571 2,294 1,600 1,100
Use of personal auto 553 552 500 650
Print public information 136 35 220 220
Promotions 1,244 97 685 700
Insurance 11,185 12,050 16,000 16,500
Postage 0 0 . 100 100
Telephone 1,310 1,504 2,400 2,600
Contract equip repair 58 401 500 700
Contract radio repair 705 588 1,400 1,500
Contract vehicle repair 3,024 4,421 5,500 6,500
Contract linen 567 378 750 800
Data processing 308 485 250 600
Schools + conferences 1,074 947 2,200 2,400
Dues + subscriptions 317 851 500 950
Licenses and taxes 192 75 350 350
Uncollectible accounts 39.795 37.428 46.462 49.455
Interest expense 8,357 5,718 2,613 0
Depreciation 17,790 18,300 32,730 33,500
Total expense $384,721 $415,503 $573,775 $610,998
Net increase/(dec. ) $189,931 $184,805 $622 $1,064
ALF AMBULANCE
WORKING CAPITAL
•
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Current assets
Cash $197,561 $236,489 $206,145 $215,279
Accounts receivable, net 84,537 119,949 131,944 145,138
Prepaid expenses 13,846 7,997 8,797 9,676
Total current assets $295,944 $364,435 $346,885 $370,093
Current liabilities
Accrued salaries $12,014 $10,395 $11,435 $12,578
Accounts payable 10,866 9,143 9,143 9,143
Accrued interest payable 1,013 1,341 0 0
Bonds payable-current 47,500 47,500 0 0
Total current liabilities $71,393 $68,379 $20,578 $21,721
Total working capital $224,551 $296,056 $326,308 $348,372
,'
CHANGES IN WORKING CAPITAL
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Funds provided
Net income $189,931 $184,805 $622 $1,064
Depreciation - 17,790 18,300 32,730 33,500
*Total funds provided $207,721 $203, 105 $33,352 $34,564
Funds applied
Additions to fixed assets $3,201 $84, 100 $3,100 $12,500
Debt retirement 47,500 47,500
Total funds applied $50,701 $131 ,600 $3.100 $12,500
Net increase/(decrease) in working capital $157,020 $71,505 $30,252 $22,064
Working capital, January 1 67,531 224,551 296,056 326,308
Working capital, December 31 $224,551 $296,056 $326,308 $348,372
B U D GET A S S U M P T IONS -
• 1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
POPULATION
Apple Valley 28,538 29,109 32,309 33,278
Lakeville 17,865 18,222 20,783 21 ,406
Farmington 5,010 5,110 5,275 5,375
Total population 51,413 52,441 58,367 60,059
PER CAPITA COST $3.69 $3.25 $2.75 $2.50
COST PER CITY
Apple Valley $105,346 $94,604 $88,850 $83,195
Lakeville 65,947 59,222 57,153 53,515
Farmington 18,494 16,608 14,506 13,438
$189,787 $170,433 $160,509 $150,148
SERVICE BILLINGS
Total transports 1,357 1,356 1,475 1,570
Average revenue per call $269 $275 $280 $280
Total service billings $365,033 $372,900 $413,000 $439,600
SERVICE BILLINGS
For operations 334,005 341,204 379,960 404,432
Designated for future equipment replacement 31,028 31,697 33,040 35, 168
$365,033 $372,900 $413,000 $439,600
ti •
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
New Ambulance
Chassis $22,000
Module 40,000
Telecommunications equipment
Radios/telephone 6,500
Portable radios (2) 2,400
Pagers (2) 700
Defibrillation/monitor
Life Pak 5 8,500
Refurbish/Repower Medic #11 10,500
New engine, rebuilt frame
Interior/exterior refurbish
Miscellaneous equipment for new ambulance
Equipment 7,100
Office Furniture
• Misc. furniture for new quarters 2,000
TOTAL ACQUISITION OF EQUIPMENT $0 $84,100 • $3,100 $12,500
• \ . ,
ALF AMBULANCE
1 9 8 9 & 1 9 9 0 BUDGET
ALF AMBULANCE
BALANCE SHEET
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash 197.561 236,489 206,145 215,279
Accounts receivable, net 84,537 119,949 131,944 145,138
Prepaid expenses 13,846 7,997 8,797 9.676
Total current assets $295,944 $364,435 $346,885 $370,093
Property, plant and equipment
Machinery + equipment $157,454 $241,554 $244,654 $257,154
Less: accumulated depreciation (35,539) (53,839) (86,569) (120,069)
Net equipment $121,915 $187,715 $158,085 $137,085
Total assets $417,859 $552,150 $504,970 $507,178
#4 LIABILITIES AND RETAINED EARNINGS
Current liabilities
Accrued salaries $12,014 $10,395 $11,435 $12,578
Accounts Payable 10,866 9,143 9,143 9,143
Accrued interest payable 1,013 1,341
Bonds payable-current 47,500 47,500
Total current liabilities $71,393 $68,379 $20,578 $21 ,721
Long-term liabilities
Bonds Payable $47,500
Retained earnings
Designated 28,301 61,688 94,728 129,896
Undesignated 270,665 422,084 389,665 355,562
Total retained earnings $298,966 $483,771 $484,393 $485,457
Total $417,859 $552, 150 $504,970 $507.178
ALF AMBULANCE
S T A T EMENT OF REVENUESANA) EXPENSE
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Revenues
City support $189,787 $170,433 $160,509 $150, 148
Township support 5,100 6,600 6,000 6,800
Service billings 362,784 417,334 413,000 439,600
Less Medicare/Medicaid ( 18,837) (15,488) (16,485)
Miscellaneous 12,373 11 ,836 7,500 8,500
Interest 4,608 12,942 2,875 23,500
Total revenues $574,652 $600,308 $574,396 $612,063
Expense
Salaries full-time $215,189 $236,089 $323,482 $356,837
PERA 8,637 10,055 13,748 15,166
FICA 14,914 17,767 24,488 26,798
Hospitalization 12,540 13,959 29,700 29,700
Workmans Comp 13,814 14,293 26,202 16,097
Office supplies 553 357 1,000 1,000
Operating Supplies 1,181 1,690 1,000 1,500
Motor fuels 5,741 6,652 8,750 9,500
Lubricants 0 64 500 500
Clothing 1,311 2,765 3,000 3,500
Oxygen 385 357 445 575
Equipment parts 1,648 1,613 2,500 3,000
7 Medical supplies 3,915 5,158 6,600 7,100
Audit 0 0 600 1,200
Collection services 15,707 18,560 17,000 19,900
Professional services 2,571 2,294 1,600 1,100
Use of personal auto 553 552 500 650
Print public information 136 35 220 220
Promotions 1,244 97 685 700
Insurance 11,185 12,050 16,000 16,500
Postage 0 0 100 100
Telephone 1,310 1,504 2,400 2,600
Contract equip repair 58 401 500 700
Contract radio repair 705 588 1 ,400 1 ,500
Contract vehicle repair 3,024 4,421 5,500 6,500
Contract linen 567 378 750 800
Data processing 308 485 250 600
Schools+ conferences 1,074 947 2,200 2,400
Dues + subscriptions 317 851 500 950
Licenses and taxes 192 75 350 350
Uncollectible accounts . 39,795 37,428 46.462 49.455
Interest expense8,357 5,718 2,613 0
Depreciation 17,790 18,300 32,730 33,500
Total expense $384,721 $415,503 $573,775 $610,998
Net increase/(dec. ) $189,931 $184,805 $622 $1,064
ALF AMBULANCE
WORKING CAPITAL
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Current assets
Cash $197,561 $236,489 $206,145 $215,279
Accounts receivable, net 84,537 119,949 131,944 145,138
Prepaid expenses 13,846 7,997 8,797 9,676
Total current assets $295,944 $364,435 $346,885 $370,093
Current liabilities
Accrued salaries $12,014 $10,395 $11,435 $12,578
Accounts payable 10,866 9,143 9,143 9,143
Accrued interest payable 1,013 1,341 0 0
Bonds payable-current 47,500 47,500 0 0
Total current liabilities $71,393. $68,379 $20,578 $21,721
Total working capital $224,551 $296,056 $326,308 $348,372
JO
CHANGES IN WORKING CAPITAL
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Funds provided '
Net income $189,931 $184,805 $622 $1,064
Depreciation 17,790 18,300 32,730 33,500
Total funds provided $207,721 $203,105 $33,352 $34,564
Funds applied
Additions to fixed assets $3,201 $84, 100 $3,100 $12,500
Debt retirement 47,500 47,500
Total funds applied $50,701 $131,600 $3,100 $12,500
Net increase/(decrease) in working capital $157,020 $71,505 $30,252
$22,064
Working capital , January 1 67,531 224,551 296,056 326,308
Working capital , December 31 $224,551 $296,056 $326,308 $348,372
BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS
• 1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
POPULATION
Apple Valley 28,538 29,109 32,309 33,278
Lakeville 17,865 18,222 20,783 21 ,406
Farmington 5,010 5,110 5,275 5,375
Total population 51,413 52,441 58,367 60,059
PER CAPITA COST $3.69 $3.25 $2.75 $2.50
COST PER CITY
Apple Valley $105,346 $94,604 $88,850 $83, 195
Lakeville 65,947 59,222 57,153 53,515
Farmington 18,494 16,608 14,506 13,438
$189,787 $170,433 $160,509 $150, 148
SERVICE BILLINGS
Total transports 1,357 1,356 1,475 1,570
101 Average revenue per call $269 $275 $280 $280
Total service billings $365,033 $372,900 $413,000 $439,600
SERVICE BILLINGS
For operations 334,005 341,204 379,960 404,432
Designated for future equipment replacement 31,028 31,697 33,040 35, 168
$365,033 $372,900 $413,000 $439,600
1987 1988 1989 1990
ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
New Ambulance
Chassis $22,000
Module 40,000
Telecommunications equipment
Radios/telephone 6,500
Portable radios (2) 2,400
Pagers (2) 700
Defibrillation/monitor
Life Pak 5 8,500
Refurbish/Repower Medic #11 10,500
New engine, rebuilt frame
• Interior/exterior refurbish
Miscellaneous equipment for new ambulance
Equipment 7,100
Office Furniture
• Misc. furniture for new quarters 2,000
f TOTAL ACQUISITION OF EQUIPMENT $0 $84,100 • $3,100 $12,500
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. 2c7)6____
NAME: Tom Kaldunski
est—
DEPARTMENT: General Services
DATE: April 25, 1989
MEETING DATE: May 1, 1989 ✓J�
CATEGORY: New Business (�
SUBJECT: Storm Water Management
EXPLANATION: Staff will be presenting a storm water management plan
based upon a "utility" fee.
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY:
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
.1.4041/14/4411
SIGNATURE
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
DATE: APRIL 28, 1989
The City of Farmington has adopted a Stormwater Management Plan which provides
funding via development charges for the installation of ponds and storm sewer
trunks. These fees are collected from all new developments. The funds are
used to install stormwater management improvements in the developing areas of
the community. This plan does not address the developed portions of town. There
are a number of problem areas in the developed community which have been discussed
by the City Council (i.e. Southeast Area Storm Sewer, 2nd Street Storm Sewer Trunk,
Hill Dee area, etc.) . The proposed storm sewer improvements for these areas must
have a funding mechanism in order for the projects to be completed. Several
funding options include MSA Funding, assessments to benefitted properties, Ad Valorem
taxes, storm water utility fees, etc.
It is very important to develop a funding proposal which will allow the City the•
flexibility to solve the stormwater management problems. The memo, dated April 25,
from Wayne Henneke, Finance Director outlines several of these options. I strongly
favor the creation of a stormwater utility, similar to the one in Apple Valley, to
fund projects in the developed portion of the community. A utility based upon the
land area and runoff coefficients is the most equitable because it is based upon
the Engineering Design Criteria for sizing the storm sewer trunks and ponding areas.
This method would ensure that all properties will be charged an equitable fee
based upon the actual stormwater runoff from each property.
In order to set up a utility, it is necessary to identify proposed improvement
projects and establish a priority list. A capital improvement plan can be
developed from the priority list. I have prepared a map outlining various projects
which the Council has been discussing recently as the preliminary priority list.
It will be presented at the meeting. The Council will ultimately establish the
final priority list when a capital improvement plan is approved.
The top priority should be given to the trunk storm sewer proposed along the
west side of the railroad tracks from the river to Walnut Street, continuing along
Walnut Street to 4th and 5th Streets. I would place this project at the top of the
list because it has direct ties to the Council approved Municipal State Aid 5 Year
Capital Improvement Plan. Without the storm sewer trunk to the river, it may not
be feasible to proceed with the 1989 MSA project on 1st Street and Walnut Street
without the storm sewer funding.
This project consists of 2 distinct phases. Phase I consists of a 66" RCP along
the west side of the railroad from the river to Walnut Street. The estimated storm
sewer project cost of this Phase I is $617,000. MnDOT has established that
$239,000 of this outfall line will be funded through the City's MSA Funding as after
the fact needs. The remaining $378,000 must be funded through other options
(i.e. utility fee, assessments, etc.)
The second phase consists of a 48" RCP on Walnut Street from the railroad tracks
to 5th street as part of the 1989 MSA Street Improvement Project. The estimated
storm sewer trunk costs of Phase II is $130,000. It is estimated that MSA funds
will cover $35,000 and the remaining $95,000 must be funded through other options
as discussed previously.
The 2nd priority for storm sewer improvements in the developed portions of the
community should be given to the Southeast Storm Sewer Project. This project
has received a lot of attention from the City Council in the last 3-5 years
and a high priority has been assigned to it. In fact, the Vermillion River
Watershed Management Board has recently authorized a study of the project following
the City's feasibility study and Council resolutions asking for project implementation.
The project is tentatively scheduled for 1991-1992.
This project consists of a series of storm sewer trunks and ponding improvements
as outlined in the feasibility study and shown in the City's Stormwater Management
Plan. The project should be constructed with an alignment which carries the
stormwater north to the Vermillion River as directly as possible. The estimated
project cost is $1.5 million. I cannot determine the amount which needs to be
funded by the City at this time due to the complex nature of the project and the
number of potential users of the system (i.e. , City, Empire, Castle Rock, MnDOT,
County, etc.) . I hope that the study being conducted by the Watershed Management
Board will address this. I would assume that the City will be responsible for
at least 1/2 of the cost ($750,000) .
The projects identified on the map for the 10 year CIP are for information only
and they should be discussed as the Council establishes the priority list.
In summary, the City has to come up with financing for the following projects
over the next 5 Year CIP at a minimum:
Storm Sewer Improvemetns Est. City Funding
2nd Street Trunk $378,000
Walnut Street Trunk 95,000
S.E. Area Trunk and Ponds 750,000
Total $1,223.000
In order to fund these storm sewer improvements, I would recommend that the City
establish a storm sewer utility and determine what share of the City's costs
can be assessed as lateral benefits.
-7,:4r,44)/
Thomas J. Kaldunski P.E.
City Engineer
cc: file
Wayne Henneke
TJK
! S d g ' c c r.,‘ r, L ., WWle,,t, 11', 2e,'S 3 3 nil M
F 6000 E 5000 p .000
ja l t
1'-
22
h,
_...
' ,& \ ._r_r,
f� •
11
li �_-... _ ,\\\\
.. 20
n. \— - _ _——__ _
— II
I : 1,1111iIli i
[lift
/ :1".
_ � 1 �' :9
,;_p___,.....:;_-___,-------
27 26 - 23 d JO r ..
— - log —
h. J �
�
, ✓ r....,p.� ��A1iar"i 1
m T1NON
- 1' 1 MI MN ,B EH NE TN IN N r 1O.
Witial` H Hlr r°;NO 1uNNWIS a 32
34 ..---- - 33_ 36
I 1 u, 1 11 1111114113111;
1 1311 M I
.ao
— —, 1 �" .I ,'0 rn® '. — (AEC.
-- d--/L--1- - , ,..‘ •:1.;.8. r-, -L ' I ova ••• r•41,
I1 `f' l[IIfTTil�1I..,L.1 j u.,.
3- 6 4u 1 61161 _.T'
y •
✓ 5
1 / ------"---- --------------------------- \
....
_____,
.,..
r gggg , , ,, .,-..,, i' i i., i I, .1, mi. , i,„
,,,- t. i ; i ! E t !it ,.1.1 .7; i
CITY OF FARMINGTON e. =: -= ��,,
RJP05e4 ST-004 Se„i ee 7iu,,is o. °�iN D iekped /eeq S --_ �.
ARTERIAL
syr C.I r?- /'t 9- /YY'/
/urr L,1-P - /YY..- ZUCO rromm
Memo to: Mayor & Council
Date April 25, 1989
Re Storm Water Management
During 1988, the City Council directed staff to continue
researching the establishment of a special taxing district to
raise Funds to help Fund capital costs of storm sewers .
After that meeting, the City Attorney recommended to put the
project on hold due to continuing court cases that would
effect the City 's establishment of the special taxing
district .
The court cases that were monitored have been resolved and it
is time to implement a Storm Water Management Program For the
City . Since there are new members on the Council the
possible Financing tools for the Funding of the construction
of storm sewer systems will be explained . The Following is a
listing of four funding alternatives and comments regarding
each:
Funding Options
1) AdValorem - M .S .
Chapter '1'1'1 allows the City to establish a special taxing
district without proving benefit to the property . The tax is
within the City 's levy limits and would take away From the
ability to Fund the daily operations of the City . Currently ,
the City must use the total provided by levy limits to fund
the operations of the City . Any reduction in available Funds
would result in the reduction of services . To levy a special
levy under Chapter '1'1'1 the City would need to hold a public
hearing which would include sending notices of the public
hearing to all residents along with the same publishing
requirements required under Chapter '129 . This procedure
would need to be done each year the levy is to be made . The
use of advalorem taxes to fund the construction of storm
sewers would also create a situation where SO% of the users
pay For 100% of the project . 50% of the property in
Farmington is tax exempt . The residents and businesses would
pay For the storm sewers but the FAA, Railroad, School
District, Churches, Telephone Company , H .R .A . , and City
Property which would benefit From the project would not have
to share the costs because they are tax exempt . Also,
certain properties which have paid a stormwater trunk Fee
would now be required to contribute additional Funds . This
is not a fair, equitable way to Finance this type of project
because all benefited properties do not pay their Fair share.
2) AdValorem - M .S . q73
Chapter 't73 allows the City to establish a special taxing
district For benefitted areas within a watershed district .
The entire City could not be taxed to pay for stormwater
improvements . To use this option the City would need to have
the Vermillion River Watershed Plan approved by the State .
There would be more than one watershed area within the City
because each taxing district is configured in a manner
consistent with the drainage of surface water within the
area . The tax under Chapter X73 is outside of the City 's
levy limit . Even though the levy is outside levy limits the
same facts are true regarding tax exempt property as
explained above . To levy a tax under Chapter T73 the
individual notices to property owners are not required on an
annual basis as they are under Chapter L/Liq .
3) Special Assessments - M .S . X29
The projects could be funded under M .S . L129 . The problem is
proving benefit . A property may contribute to the storm
sewer problem but it would be difficult to prove
benefit . Benefit have been defined as the increase in
property value resulting from the project . Because it is
extremely difficult to prove that all contributing properties
increased in value from a project this is really not an
option.
LI) Storm Water Utility
The establishment of a storm water utility seems to be the
best alternative available . The charges are based on run-off
from the property . Each type of property is given a utility
rate .
The Cities of Roseville, Richfield, and Apple Valley have
storm water utility fees . Roseville has been used a a model
by cities interested in establishing such a fee . In talking
to Roseville 's City Engineer, the storm water utility fee has
been received well by the property owners and is generating
the revenue they need to construct ponding areas, storm sewer
maintenance , and minor capital improvements . The City
Engineer stressed the necessity to sell the Storm Water
Management Program to the citizens .
The City is looking at two major projects . The S .E. Area
Storm Sewer Project with a total cost of $1 .5 million and the
2nd Street Storm Sewer Project with a total cost of $1 . 1
million . These projects will be funded by State Aid Street
Funds, and local funding . The storm sewer laterals will be
funded through special assessments . If the City plans to
correct its storm sewer problems we must begin raising local
revenues immediately to help fund these projects .
The Storm Water Utility can generate approximately $55, 000
per year with a rate for single family resident of $5 .00
per quarter .
Farmington 's newly developed areas are being taken care of at
the time of development . It is time that storm water problems
are taken care of in the older parts of the City . This is a
way in which these improvements can be funded by the property
owners that use the service . It is important that Council
makes a decision on this matter . Projects scheduled For this
year depend on what is to be decided tonight . The 1989
construction season is beginning .
It is recommended to give staff firm direction as to how the
Storm Water Management Plan is to be funded and to direct
staff to prepare the necessary documents and policies .
(A*16/41"e- 6.-42___
Wayne E . Henneke
Finance Director
c .c . Larry Thompson, City Administrator
Tom Kaldunski , City Engineer
file
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. 3 6
•
NAME: Gerald Henricks
DEPARTMENT: HRA
DATE: April 28, 1989
MEETING DATE: May 1, 1989
CATEGORY: Add On
SUBJECT: Low Income Tax Credit Application
EXPLANATION:
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo/Application - Gerald Henricks
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Gerald Henricks HRA
Larry Thompson Administration
HRA Members
SIGNATURE
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: LOW INCOME TAX CREDIT APPLICATION
DATE: APRIL 28, 1989
The HRA has been working with EMC Development in an effort to secure Senior
Housing in Farmington. These efforts have provided results with EMC Development
interested in building a 42 unit apartment complex on the 3i vacant lots on
Oak Street south of Hardee's, and the building of a 24 unit townhouse complex
located north of Elm Street and south of Main Street.
A study was performed by Health Planning and Management Resources, Inc. for
the Dakota County HRA in September, 1988, that indicated that the City of
Farmington was in need of Senior Housing units. Based on this study, and the
waiting list for Senior Housing at Spruce Place and Red Oak Manor, the
Farmington HRA felt this was one of the housing areas the City should pursue.
The new HUD Law, 100-430, restricts the designation of Tax Credits for
housing to Low Income Housing preventing the designation of Senior Housing
on the Tax Credit application. The first paragraph of the letter from EMC
Development, dated April 28, 1989, indicates that they will direct their
efforts toward senior housing needs.
Therefore, I request that the Council consider these "best efforts" of
EMC Development when acting upon the Tax Credit application. Included for
your consideration is:
Letter from EMC Development
Table 11 and 17 of Housing Study
Tax Credit Application
These 2 projects will require a zoning change for the townhouses and a
conditional use permit in the future. As the projects progress to the signing
of a developers agreement, this concern will be addressed by the Planning
Commission and the Council.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
'l• / / �L1. 4
/
Gerald A. Henricks
HRA Director
cc: file
Larry Thompson
HRA Members
Ernie Darflinger
Charles Tooker
Karen Finstuen
GAH
DEVELOPMENT
370 summit avenue
saint out,mn smog
28 April 1909 et2.22e-0106
Gerald A. Henricks
HRA Director
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Dear Oerry:
It is EFIC Development's intent that best efforts will be used to rent a
minimum of 60% of our total 66 units (40 units) to seniors. However, we
honestly believe that the actual percent rented to seniors will be much
higher because of the follows g reasons:
1 . Architectural design. The design of the units as well as the project
as a whardill focus on neeUs and amenities appropriate to people age 62
and older.
a. Units will be slightly smaller in size. A 1-bedroom unit will be
approximately 550 square feet; a 2-bedroom unit will be approxi-
mately 850 square feet. According to statutary code the City can
limit the number of people who, for safety reasons, can live in
units of these sizes.
b. Outside the units there will be areas designed for seniors, i .e.
horseshoe and/or shuffleboard courts; picnic tables; walking paths.
(No children's play equipment will be provided. )
c. The HUD requirement that a certain percent will be handicap acces-
sible will be met.
d. An attempt will be made to design kitchens appropriate for people
with limited arm reach and flexibility.
e. A "card" room, or "activity" room will be included in the apartment
building for residents of the entire project. This will supplement
the City's senior center during inclement weather.
2. Marketing. Our marketing team which is experienced in marketing to
seniors (and is a1l ker Methodist trained) will begin to publicize our project
to seniors after May 1 . In fact, on May 12 we will be making our first pres-
entation to the seniors at the Senior Citizen Center following their noon
meal.
Also, the dav_ after receiving final City Council approval for our project,
M ,,,.a+•hvVSrrg plan iso aoni•ar •111 ba imp1r.m+.ntoA Thera willFRYhR t)lATI
to mar e o non-seniors.
cz
3. Management. The management company for the project will have a
reputation in the7ield for being a "senior" management company. Included
in the management plan will be:
iPR- 2S- r39 PRI 8 : 01 'EYL4ORI3 � P 8
Page Two
a. An "I 'm okay" check where each day by 9:04 AM each senior will
place a card in his/her window or on the doorknob. A "buddy" will
check that the card is there. If it isn't, the caretaker or mana-
ger will be notified at once. This person will then have the right
to enter the premise to check on the senior.
b. In case of an emergency, i.e. a person breaks a leg, the management
company will make the necessary arrangements with the Meals-On-Wheels
program, county nurse, and county or City transportation service to
provide assistance as is needed.
c. Activities such as card parties, pot luck meals, easy exercise/aero-
bics classes, etc. will be organized in the "card" room located in
the apartment building. The room will also be available for family
parties. Special outings will also be coordinated.
With attention to specific details as outlined above in the areas of design,
marketing and management we believe our project will attract and will be
rented by people in the upper age bracket and therefore will meet the goals
of both of us---the City and the developer.
In addition, the project's name can influence who will live in it. We would
be open to name suggestions from the City. If possible, the name should in-
clude the word "Village" since we feel that it invokes an essence of what we
are attempting to accomplish.
We sincerely hope the above information will provide to you and your City's
representatives the comfort level needed to allow us to continue to work
through the City process so that construction can begin on both sites some-
time in August of this year.
Sincerely yours,
BEVELOPl9ENT
4A4/ arl) AA beedei„,-4 -
Carol 3. lavick
'-_4
Mark Clemens
APR — 8 - 89 FR I 8 : 04- :BYWORDS P _ 0 -=,
DIRK YOUNG,tNG '
•
LANDSCAPE AROVTECTUPS • •
0-
t4.44/1-%'` i5a5HE PIN ME&,�fi#319
r• -.^-�
:,..._ Ill.. MIT4NEAP01.6.MN 55443
A612)340-0= r,� .,
- = ..
•
I
.,,.,Ni- N,1 1 'Si ...N., . ••••m,•Ia.l• e : ,a. ..,...
•••• ,,,:,..._.-...,. _ ..,.... .,. _.,..t. ...,.. ,,,. ..z. • .....„-,..; A• -..k. •• s,:,c v'' , ,. •
rl '` •• •••••. • •
::.-, : _
.4 ____ , .
:.....;.: 4a,
y .. •.
_,.. .
,...,,,:
. . •
�•r ,
'S .."• . /
K yN •i • .Ilfi •L•
•
ti
• `� Y `,• •',.450`uJ • \ +
_ .I; .fit I. \`'4ti1�` •• `•4 �
• ;�s • �� `.
•
It
•
.• Ys.•'- .� . :!its\�• \ \ \``.�;��ti• '• . •\�•
,41
'• •N. •
V'• ,`may ` ,'�.��a�1.`` +� �4,' •. •~•` \� # : -� . \ Z.
` l ,:�• :rt•4t�. \� LSy'.-�,� • ' `.� •,_.:ate-; _ +�•M.
-
F• - 0 .._
APR - 28 - 89 PRI 8 : 07- BYWORDS
•
. .
,..,==.td.c...-:..-.7.s... . _i.,,. _.... •._ _ ., ,
-7.. •-*•"1'7---7S-7„.,..,_ A.',"S`i,••`.44,-`. .;:4f.,`•.„,(.5‘ -`.--., :'• ..„.. ..:-%.'1,:-..tot.•***Nz.,..%;$.' .= .•
.4%4;•:-.4 1;•'......., ,NZ.,::7,:•."1,;::1 .,;:,...S.•'`.....;:..i1/41.-1,VW•NN0, ,...A,'.. •-4.;1.:31,71.zi.':,;;•••.1.-.•;.41‘41..; :', - • 1 ..--..- ,...., • • ' .
s •...%;,..•- '4•• •.....1'4.4`:i 14-a.‘'••:kim,-.'•,••:•;4-1-1,1.-V•• ;--1..--4: -4,• --.t.'4\-T-1. ' 1. . :0,...:....., `,. • ..-. .,. .
;•••••••• ••:.";•,• .., •s,,-% 'Al;b.„:3........z..: .-..c.k.-7v,-,,ssz... 4,.. „,;,, et- .-,1,.;........• .,?,• ,+••: ' ,.,:.- /14 ;•• -•• s.
, .. . . •
•.-;--..• .1'..N''•:\,•:,-:.%.1%%•,-...$7'4:: -'4•14 . !"-4, \ITN '• , 4i%..,.:7*.,..:.., ...:_.iiii i V,'. . ,
i"..4.•-• 4:'.
•4.;, ...c..4.--,. - --..--.-1•t•.„,•: e. -w,,,it.• 44,,, ir•t.," . , ;:. .0,-,:14•-•.., 'Lg..1
„..s-.......i_i. .4. ?.....i....e.,4-7,44.... , . 1,.. ... -..: • • • .. ,_ •
. .
' .
4...4.. , •
...,, •
•.!,•55,1.',
14
,,;•,-,-• •;•:tz b I uarm 111k,k„IN..%-
,
•i
•...•,,•,
-."N 5 • V.„1.1 r- s ..\k% ,5•• „•
• ••
.5.‘455.t• ''':' .".. .' '1.‘44Nikt - . i 5 lk.,4.1(44 : • i•• .
••••A 5 , •': It!
. , „..,
.4 .. 4 ,i -, N , - 4•N "1.
N.N.k.1.0• ' . al t•,,.
• ‘L:1.F'N' !•:1/411q Nts.1 J , • . 1
* - ..7•••45 r .. .
• s
.,
iii
UhitIZ ,\-4 :••• ..• ':'
.•
_........ -
. t..„ .
.....-
.. _
,;3, :.... ,.-.7'.' ilg; ,; ...44:. :.?' .MI.:,' . . 0.., • •
•:4„•,....ii! -.1.••• : ...,--it•,54 C,,,•.4111, 4., •.4.,•:St,:.., 1 ":.1. 4';`.1711 4
....11,"••14- 4:-...7" ' '1 47":'•4:.4 '''' ', . J.4'; IN 'ek. .....
4.... z. l• • 6 ••.'' ei' ...II . • *
, ,, .
' t ..11.:4.: +;,1• . 3.41\, 4
... '` • "Is 14.-41`..utklfj',..4 - '4 4. ''.(5k
r.."*,••••‘!, a 1 i 7i .:.**5‘a... ,••„;..5,4"..N.,,„ •:" 0%5,5
55.• , ••, .•5,. 5 El • •
'`... '111 . -15*%••i'' 5. ••• 55 ',15 aro s..1., t:
Iti'N't i *Ar.V.'Ca,i•*-,A^."r'•..5-•5:4,i• aNtlli
,...
.••R•..1•.•.'...
.aia.:.;:.*.,.....4a**-•,4.r.4.•'•'•i'•.•:.1't)s..•M•5.,4
E.•4••:1•. _'
•••.I'-
-: r "N
.5
5..
1e"••
*I.
?•
. .-....:,•
.1. .-.. a-0 ...„-4";A...10 laN:‘,,,., ..•te.'",‘,..4. . . ''..14 N 5,
Z.1.554S5::\ -.5.*Ir" "L W '. •5' IV.:5.111!.."1.51.1 44.5 .m. .
\\4k/‘ . AStWN.44
C.Y4ItiVi. •
-*c •,
..7.4Nk'k'N ' ' N ... **5:•,::**".05 :"5 '
;5,5:::FN"5 .. 0, •,', . ..• .,,s, 6,.vi:.r.7.L.-.4 ..,4. :. .- P.
,..7,ti.N•ti.S.:11:44.LN•_ 'N\,,,. ....-:. ..4.,-•'it, •tt.S.Z1 n$V21.:4. -,. .4 ‘3,11 4 •
-.5,4 15.,NN•*1•-•*5 4..-;.: *•.46V*NN‘5Z:1`k:.‘ral'iN.. %. ..1.'.f ... \ 'W •,,,
::• 'Z' \Zg:lt 11111
• *:...at•:". . 4‘.\k.4N•s•,•, .%,.••...4.„....-.1.V0.2.0•JN: Z.,INZI.Z. ,.•4i.. ••• ...••••.,;
ON 44•••." -`\,,":.'•.'%-%zSt..,s*".,-.VV:.' •
..:*, .1/4%.::.%.01%,,,.‘"•% .% ..,.4.,.') :..l. -••.6 •
..•••.•..\ • 4.•2.•••••••4•11.%1/4• •• .4% -1/•••%, • 1...' .... ••Z ;
44., •..••••..;!Q. •...::.• 44.•a.,i. •••45*AZ,,5%. ‘..51 * le ' V:g ''-
.--4.r..1.1.:titf.s.%S.T'4`L*7.X.11/4:`. 44 .1'..".4‘...... t.N.- :S.-4. • -;.
'44"..:"..•.:4.4::-%::**.V...14.:: .....,`."\",....:% . 4. , b.:. . ' -r. . :.....
,..../.., k
litrilktp.„7‘...k..4.:44:7: 4;,,,'N • ..k'.,,-• . • ... '‘.. 4 •. :Irs-,;•
St. `.. '`•', ."' • • .."1:k... .‘ NNALN%•kv•NN• ' '‘‘•
.• •sts : --",...,... . , 4•:• ..... 6.
' 2 :•-
N4 4:-,- ••'.k-Nk. **...4 "
z'Az:A.:* - :::••• •••4% ',... ',*.-"' ..NCW41-itsk..fE 114';'• ek.
• .:..a... ..,,, ..,,.. '-‘1., ..... . , .0.,... lip P
•.„. ..... -N..01Kki• ••• . - • ...1 gki. ..'..'" '•
• `. ' .?
' :N.'.., •":.... .. •••Z• N•46
.,,,.• •.,. • , ...„_ 'V
4:s.**,,,„, • "••4.. •-• -.„. - ... .A,4::-.- '''',',.,,,.--.1/4;11:1.'4' ;re
.4._-4 ••-...--.,••
'-•\-.. Z.."-"t%-..iStz's- '''k:-."`--4....Not.N2*-44-4::. 7,I. ....c.-
,k.. liv5Trw
.... „.......„... . % , . .., . , . ,
•ii. ...Ile,- -:t4 7.
. . 1„_.•
. ..'na.4.-i , Y%'„4?".' 'SNIZNV,4::%A:0447Z-, ..' ;./..•‘: 4.
..•............
... ,...... ,.. •ro.• ...1. .t.,, .
Ak ilfi•JI di.A.:64'''‘.5.
'.••••• .• t>443 t•
4.;6•61. ..4'.....:•..,":•••?$..86., NiLak7., 7:103.
,:;.:1'S%•\.,:i !,... illitt.r... ...jyt• ....41:4.4?..V.... h.,...i..N....4.
.,..t N*4 Ns,.. ;•,,t., 7../..z,..,,,,,,p, . ,
.7.%.'4E -•
..„.5,k.}.....;\55,,...5.
ri, "-: .
41'
It • '41:4 ib '. '- 6
.444..:. 77‘.. -
•*-•-• ''k -'444,-, ,
.•4. •• W. --.. . 1,.. .,,,.'i•'•Az'A.A. 4. -.-V-4,. •l''.. •
. ..
)
- --
...
•
.... 4
......I
..k ...-%.44... 1,
. .4.... .....,,.:7-44.4.... ..4...r.:544-2.'....- .••:.1....., sl.
..---•-4,..ic--: -:-......- • .:, . ,._;.- -... ,,,, ....4:-.4.1". ,.- - • 441.v ...-4 '
.....Z....4 ir •
.
•
MEMO TO: GERALD HENRICKS
SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN HOUSING
DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1989
At its last regular meeting, the Planning Commission discussed a request from
LaDonna Riste to add two efficiency apartments to the second floor of the
business building she owns together with her husband on Oak Street. The ordi-
nance is written in a manner that will allow densities of 20 units per acre
if private resources are involved, but 60 units per acre if the housing will
be utilized by the elderly or handicapped. It came about when regulations
were modified to accommodate the construction of Spruce Place. The discrepancy
has not come up before since high density market rate housing has not been
proposed as a new use in the business district. The property owned by the
Ristes will accommodate 1.7 units of market rate housing and 5 units of elderly
or handicapped housing. Because a major emphasis of the downtown plan was to
encourage an increase in residential density around the business district to
support new business investment, the Planning Commission is seriously considering
an amendment to the zoning ordinance which would place the density of all down-
town housing at 60 units per acre.
Recognizing that some accommodation will need to be made for parking, and that
the HRA will be immediately involved in any potential change in standards, the
Commission would like a response from the HRA before forwarding any recommended
changes to the City Council.
Thank you for your consideration.
(91L4;17.4
Charles Tooker *
Planner
cc: Development Committee
HRA
ZI !
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
DECEMBER 12, 1989
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Hanson.
Members Present: Dau, Hanson, Rotty, Schlawin.
Members Absent: Strelow
Also Present: Planner Tooker.
2. Chairman Hanson asked William Uhlir about his understanding of the sign pro-
blem at his residence on Highway 50. Mr. Uhlir indicated that he sharpened saws
as a retirement project, but that the revenues generated did not justify paying
for a public hearing. It was explained to him that all home occupations require
a conditional use public hearing. The Commission members said that such a hearing
likely would prove to be favorable regarding the home occupation but they said
that the sign he has is too large and likely would be limited to a 1'x 2' name-
plate. Mr. Uhlir said he would remove the existing sign and think bout asking
for a home occupation in the future.
r 3. Chairman Hanson then recognized LaDonna Riste who would like to add two efficiency
apartments on the second floor of the business building she owns with her husband
on Oak Street. Planner Tooker indicated that the request could not be handled
through the current ordinance since apartment densities in the downtown are limited
to 20 units per acre. On the other hand, housing for elderly and handicapped
could be built at 60 units per acre. In essence, market rate housing, such as
the units proposed by Ms. Riste, could only include 1.7 units on this lot, whereas
subsidized housing could include 5 units. The Chairman suggested that the staff
review the ordinance with an eye toward eliminating this discrepancy and to ask
for comments from the HRA.
4. Member Strelow arrived at 7:30 P.M.
5. Chairman Hanson next moved to Dr. Falkowski, who has a sign problem (too large)
at his office on Highway 3. Dr. Falkowski suggested that since his office is lo-
cated on a frontage road across from the shopping center and down the street from
a used car lot, it is more like a business district than a residential district
and the sign is a valuable part of the service he provides. The sign is 4x6
rather than 3x4 and he would like to seek a variance in order to retain the existing
sign. Members of the Commission indicated their support for such a variance and
encouraged him to apply for the variance.
6. Planner Tooker said that Paster Enterprises has found a prospective tenant who
would move to the Farmington Mall on Highway 3 if the Zoning Ordinance were to be
amended. Currently day care is listed as a conditional use in the R-3 High Density
district but not in the B-1 Limited Business District. Most large franchise day
care facilities are found in business districts because of the traffic and most
are situated in buildings designed for that purpose. Farmington Mall is somewhat
different in that it is an existing strip center. However, by listing Day Care in
the conditional use column, the Planning Commission will be able to assure a proper
relationship between the interior space and open play areas. Good land use rela-
tionships would not include a division of areas requiring clients to mix with other
pedestrians in walking from indoor to outdoor areas of the day care facility.
2127.1
MOTION by Rotty, second by Dau to recommend that the City Council amend the
Zoning Ordinance by adding Day Care Center to the B-1 Limited Business District
as a conditional use. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
7. The Commission then discussed the proposed revision to the Sign Ordinance in
Sections 4-3-2 and 4-3-3. It has been reviewed several times by the Commission
and it recognizes the need of some business and industrial operations to have
both wall and pylon signs. The ordinance will be restrictive regarding pylon
signs particularly in the B-2 District since the size of sign relates to traffic
speed. They have been taken from a similar set of standards established for
Burnsville which includes higher speed limits adjoining the business. It was
generally agreed that the standards drafted should be tried and revised again if
it becomes apparent that they are too restrictive. MOTION by Dau, second by Strelow
to forward the proposed revision to the sign ordinance to the City Council with
the recommendation that it should be approved. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
8. Planner Tooker introduced a letter from Thomas K. Larson regarding the com-
pletion of work agreed to in the Conditional Use granted to Willys Minneapolis.
He pointed out that the items identified in the letter were acceptable to staff
but that in addition the ragged edge along the east driveway would have to be
straightened. Staff is prepared to release the $18,500 surety less $2,000 which
will be returned when all of the work has been completed. It was the consensus
of the Commission that the direction taken by the staff was within their under-
standing of the terms of this Conditional Use.
9. Chairman Hanson discussed the minutes of the meeting of November 14, 1989 and
suggested that the implementation of City Policy by the staff appeared to be at
times uneven, and that recent enforcement of the sign ordinance was making a
number of business establishments unhappy. He asked for further comments on
the minutes of Novembef 14, 1989. MOTION by Dau, second by Schlawin to approve
the minutes of November 14, 1989 as distributed. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
10. There being no further business, it was agreed that the meeting shall be
adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
Submitted by,
da,cez„a7PLed
Charles Tooker
Planner Approved