HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.05.89 Council Packet AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVE AGENDA
3. APPROVE MINUTES
a. August 16, 1989 Special
b. August 21, 1989 Regular
4. CITIZENS COMMENTS
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. 7:30 P.M. - Storm Water Utility Rates
6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
a. Resolution Approving Preliminary Plat and Signing of Final Plat -
Rosebrier Village
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Reisinger Excavating Permit
b. Space Needs - Public Works
c. Accept Bids, Award Contract - Flagstaff Bridges
d. Project 89-1, 89-3 and 89-14 - Street Improvement Project Update
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Elm Street Parking
10. MISCELLANEOUS
a. Administrator's Evaluation
b. Rece ve 1990 Operating Budget
c. Purchase of MT-1000 Handheld Motorola Radio
11. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Schobl/Conference Request - Senior Center
b. Approve Probationary Employee - Police Department
c. Schobl/Conference Request - Police Department
d. School/Conference Request - Police Department
e. Capital Outlay Request - Administration
f. Public Works Equipment
g. Approve Payment of the Bills
12. ADJOURN
THE AGENDA IS CLOSED OUT AT NOON ON THE TUESDAY PRECEDING THE MEETING.
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEMS - SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1989
NOTE: The meeting will be on Tuesday, September 5, 1989 at the Dakota Electric
building.
5a. Wayne Henneke and Tom Kaldunski will be giving the presentation. Wayne
will present a handout for the audience.
7a. Memo/Resolution enclosed.
8a. Memo enclosed.
b. Mr. Shannon will present the information at the meeting.
c. Bid Tabs/Memo enclosed.
d. Staff memo enclosed.
9a. No information available at this time.
10a. Memo enclosed.
b. Memo enclosed. The budget will be presented at the meeting.
c. Request enclosed.
lla. Request enclosed.
b. Memo enclosed.
c. Request enclosed.
d. Request enclosed.
e. Request enclosed.
f. Request enclosed.
g. Bill enclosed.
Lar Thomps5n
City Administrator
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. _arm_
NAME: Wayne Henneke Fel&
DEPARTMENT
Finance
DATE: August 8, 1989
MEETING DATE: September 5, 1989
CATEGORY: Public Hearings
SUBJECT: 7:30 P.M. - Public Hearing to Consider Storm Water Utility Rates
EXPLANATION: See memo
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Wayne Henneke/Tom Kaldunski
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Tom Kaldunski Public Works
Wayne Henneke Finance
SIGNATUREAi
_-
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
s
ITEM NO.
NAME: Larry Thompson
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: August 22, 1989
MEETING DATE: September 5, 1989
CATEGORY:
Unfinished Business
SUBJECT Space Needs - Public Works
EXPLANATION: Jerry Shannon of Springsted, Inc. will be present to discuss
a referendum.
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY:
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Department Heads
SIGNA ' ' .
CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA
$1,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
sibrx7-27.5.vteEs BUILDING
Estimated Total Cost $1,100,000
Term of Bond Issue 20 Years
Estimated Interest Rate 7.15%
Estimated Annual Debt Service $ 111,599
Estimated Shared Responsibility/Use
Annual Contribution:
Sewer Fund (8.3%) $ 9,263
Water Fund (33.3%) 37,163
Solid Waste Fund (30.6%) 34,149
General Fund (27.8%) 31,024
Estimated Tax Impact for General Fund Only:
1988/89 Tax Capacity Rate 106.8997%
Estimated Tax Capacity Rate This Issue .7810%
Estimated New Tax Capacity Rate 107.6807%
Tax Impact compares actual taxes payable in 1989 as to what they would have been if City had
added $31,024 to its levy last year.
Cif\if Qtc)
Prepared September 5, 1989
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
!
• 01 -C - (0- IO•-. 0303 . - 03Lc) � ---- Q1.-•i �t 0NLC) CX) 0NNco) el-
03 a) •r- +) C • r-+ Co) ON1. .-4LOf. LCI N .dr NI. 00 ' CX) MIO - LO
L CO 0 (U LI. M•.• e-00 LC) LC)01tO1. M.•-•- MCX) N. et-01 .rCX) 00CIN LC)
O S. C.01:3: (D •-4r-+ 00) 1 d' 01N1L) Lt) co)- LC) 0001LC) U) M
O\ 0 0101
1 Nu) co) LnMMOLC) 01to010r~ 0N. 0 m OO
• O S. Md .0-Co) gd' +•) d-Md' d dMd'
'Co) ColMrLc) 00 n
O MCMMmenolmLMMMMMMMMMMMM d• M
U t0
C
0
Cl S. M•-• d•01 Co)LC)OOtDOtOCI' OMMd'003NNtC) LA
LLJ 0) C • O 010NNerCo)erCZ) ONO3N. . -,...1,-ild)OOM0) 03
I- +-1 O •--L •
Le) POLL ..� LC)01 MI'Mqd'0103CDetNNLALC) LC) 001r-+ Cr)01 LC) ,
- C13 3 0101MtOfr)C7N. cv,ad- OO .
lr-y01� d'0) 00 y�
-CZ
5- 1 0001 Nd•erLnMMOtOOtoC10r~ Ol. r-+et O
a) - .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. 9-
� tDn ^ t0N. t N. '0NNO3tOtO^Nnt000^ to
co o_ MMMMMMMCMMMCMMMMMCMMCr) Cr) O
CL to
a)
L >1
L1 CO o
S...-C3 ... 01d 0qd• 00111104r4cv, qt.U) a U)N. 4Lc101er 1.
CDC •01 3 NNtOer)MLn1 N. cv, -010101 totDM •--100 M=
. . . . . . . . . . . .
a) La_ t0•-+003aN. LC)1. ONNCo) 0000$d•LC)I� LC) •--+ ,-�
CO 0)N. CO OO CO O .-+LC) M N.0O N 01 et el'N ti) O et 01
rti MI' N O M +-+ M O CNA C•1 +.-+N N N.-•+Lf) Cr) 01 k'
01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 LP) Q"
N
r4
0 .
0
(U 13 > . 03 001d•1.LC) N0301Cr) to' -N.Nto0303MMN O N00 7
S- C a)n---..
• O n-10
Q) OJN NNerOr,•+a'erl�l�•--+01010•--iOt000co) LC) Ln
CLL ON00d-LC) OOcv,•--+011.0LC) r-•U1030101d• CD LO •--+ OL
Cl.) X 031. Od•CV LC) NCr)O1Cr) N.U1030) 010Oto0OM d• re) U
C. fU .. . .. .. . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. ., . .. . y
I . O r.4 -4 CD rH O r-L O O •-•+r4 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4,..-+ 01
MCf)COCol Co) Co)Co)MCMCol Col MMCol Co) Col CMMCr) CO N
LC) .-
-C-C
4-1
o\e•-•-• Cr)03 0 LL)M M M M 00 M M M M LO LC)03 03 0 0 d' 0 0 0 >) •-+ 4-
LC) (n t0 Cr)L!)N to LO LO-Cr)tD 4.0•--L•--L n N.00 00 LA LC) 01 Lf) O LC) +•) .•-+ O
r
4...4O COr-id ARd-01
101M01NN. ChN N. N.0L .-+01LC) e1101. U 03 N
I- 0).--i r4 C) CJyd. N--+r-yerNCf) Cr) erMN 'U-- n CD Lc) Lc) (U N C
1�.-40pqtr.d'1.Nr~Cs) 01Cs)0100Cr) d'•.4erLC) t0 M d' Nt0 0. O
O Oqt. • I01N01Cs) 01r~ Cs)d 0104x4-+4.40d• N O 010100 L.) +)
'--L •--+r~O .--L O•--L O.-+•--+•--L O N .-+ •--L M fQ
01 01 X S.
a)
N I- 4.)
r-r- 4-)•-. 0000000000000000000 O 43 1. 01 (U
fa nS v) to LA LC) O O LO LO LC)LA LO LC)LC)L.[) L.[)O O LC)Lf) O O LC) N • N 01
4-) O. a).� • a) •• 03 Lc) +)
C)°,.. S. NI. OLc) NNNN1.NNCs) NLC) LC) I� L� 00 N. S.. C4- •• .. C
r-- U a) N N. 0)03 Li) 0 0 cv, -+d' 0 01 LO CO CO d' t0 0)U) O a) O v) 0) •-+ t0
C4.) CO'Od•NOLc)0101 al Ln CO LC LC) C •--LCC) T-+ ON d' +-) O (I) to .--0 U
•r- = .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
~
CI- OOOCD OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOa 4 •- -• - +.) C.1
00 O r- O C to C
..� 01
N O N •.-
4)•-. 0000000000000000000 O Cr- a) N
0 LC) Lc)Lc)OO LA Lc)it)Lc)LA Lc)LA LA LC) OO LA LC)00 Lc) <0- a)
a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • ..
S. NI.OLc)NNCs)NI. NNCs)C LO Ll)1.100 N. .-. O
a) N1. 0100LC) a a cv) -Ld• 001LC) MCol d•t001LC) O N. e0
+) LA 4.0 d• NOLC) 01C101LC/ LC) Lt) O• .403•-+ ON d• O U
C .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
L--L L.[) Mr�011.d•.-iCOLC)NO3mr0t0 •�Lc) O 'U N. 01 N >
N.1.I.to '0 tO to Lc)Lc) LA d' d' d' Co) Co) N c4 - •-+ L 40
01 01 E
03
� ZA �� � edt\ o\2vee \ eve \ \0° 0° \ - a)
0•-. Lf)U)0LC) aCZ) 00Lf)CLC) CD LSI aLCI OLC) 0LC) C1
CI)*4. •-LNMMd•Lnt01.Ps.03 03 01010 04-44-.+ NN •• C
(U t0tOLC) '.0Li) t0LC) LC)tOtotOtOt r..r.. N. N. . S_ -
f0 U
a)
co C >.
+) O 0
N +) r--. 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 000 000 0 0 0 O O M LC) N > 4.)
C v 0000000000000000000 O 0010 LA a) f9CDCa
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O • • O - J
C•r-•r• •r- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. LA r.•". • • >. 1=
•r•r--C U OLA LALel OOLALC)OLAOCZ) L.c)OLC)OLC) LC) O O N •--+ 1. 1. +)4- })
-0r- C MMMMehd•d• el'LC) LALC) LC)t01.1. 03000)0 0 •-L •r- O N
0 •r •--L ,4 .. U a)
1 i M
C r- 00 LZ ... C.•l fl.0 a)
O (U fg to S-
+) S- N
C) a) a) Ori a) i•-. .� NMetLAtD1.00010rtiNM� LAt01� CC) 01 •• U a)
C C U C10 S.. (ON 0101010101010101010000000000 •• a) X > to
•r' a) •r' � . O CD..... 0101010101010101010000000000 >1+) ea GC Cs' a)
ECD > •--LN +) >• NCs) (NJ N(NJ NI (NJ NNN +) f0 .. I-..i a..)
5.. i O O (U •• •r- d' a) f0
(U O a) \ M H S. a-) U) >) S.
LL. O tN N s, = • (U y >
O O (U +) CCe O O -
4- a r- ••
00 i i > 010 • 4
n. •--L NMd•LAt01. 03010 •-LNMd'tAt N. GO >- c. O
000101010101010101010100000000 - U r S-
>1 r-I O a) O a) a)-• 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 a 0 a a 0 ft! 10 • • • (31 eta a)
+) a C +) 4) -1>- N N N N N N N +) C 0 014...4 03 4-) 4-)
•.- '--+ O etf tt7 0 O > > • 01 O C
(...)49 CO C1 E F- 03 Q Q Z •--L I- L--L
i
CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA PREPARED SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
$1,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
GENERAL SERVICES BUILDING
TAX BILL IMPACT*
Residential Tax Capacity Rate: 106.900%
Homestead Property Estimated Increase: 0.781%
Est. Tax Capacity Rate with Project: 107.681%
SECTION A - 1989 PROJECTED TAX PAYMENT WITHOUT PROJECT
Al Estimated Market Value: $70,000 $80,000 $90,000 $100,000 $125,000
A2 Gross Tax Capacity: 1,526 1,776 2,026 2,276 3,101
A3 Gross Tax: 1,631 1,899 2,166 2,433 3,315
A4 Less Homestead Credit: 725 725 725 725 725
A5 Property Tax Bill: 906 1,174 1,441 1,708 2,590
SECTION B - 1989 PROJECTED TAX PAYMENT WITH PROJECT
B1 Estimated Market Value: $70,000 $80,000 $90,000 $100,000 $125,000
B2 Gross Tax Capacity: 1, 526 1,776 2,026 2,276 3,101
B3 Gross Tax: 1,643 1,912 2,182 2,451 3,339
B4 Less Homestead Credit: 725 725 725 725 725
B5 Property Tax Bill: 918 1,187 1,457 1,726 2,614
ESTIMATED 1989 TAX INCREASE r
DUE TO PROJECT: $12 ' $13 \ $16 $18 $24
*The above schedule shows the estimated increase in taxes payable at various
market values if the estimated tax capacity rate increase due to the above project
were added to the current tax capacity rate for taxes payable in 1989.
The schedule does not include the property tax refund to which a taxpayer may be
entitled based on family income.
The schedule also does not include the targeting refund to which a taxpayer may
be entitled if their 1989 property taxes payable increased by more than ten percent
over their 1988 property taxes payable on the same property.
Estimated market value is the basis from which gross tax capacity is calculated.
This value is not necessarily the price the property would bring if sold.
f
'CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA PREPARED SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
*- $1,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
GENERAL SERVICES BUILDING
TAX BILL IMPACT*
Commercial Property Tax Capacity Rate: 106.900%
Estimated Increase: 0.781%
Est. Tax Capacity Rate with Project: 107.681%
SECTION A - 1989 PROJECTED TAX PAYMENT WITHOUT PROJECT
Al Estimated Market Value: $75,000 $100,000 $125,000 $150,000 $175,000
A2 Gross Tax Capacity: 2,475 3,300 4,613 5,925 7,238
A3 Gross Tax: 2,646 3,528 4,931 6,334 7,737
A4 Less Homestead Credit: 0 0 0 0 0
A5 Property Tax Bill: 2,646 3,528 4,931 6,334 7,737
SECTION B - 1989 PROJECTED TAX PAYMENT WITH PROJECT
B1 Estimated Market Value: $75,000 $100,000 $125,000 $150,000 $175,000
B2 Gross Tax Capacity: 2,475 3,300 4,613 5,925 7,238
B3 Gross Tax: 2,665 3,553 4,967 6,380 7,794
B4 Less Homestead Credit: 0 0 0 0 0
B5 Property Tax Bill: 2,665 3,553 4,967 6,380 7,794
ESTIMATED 1989 TAX INCREASE
DUE TO PROJECT: $19 $25 $36 $46 $57
*The above schedule shows the estimated increase in taxes payable at various
market values if the estimated tax capacity rate increase due to the above project
were added to the current tax capacity rate for taxes payable in 1989.
Estimated market value is the basis from which gross tax capacity is calculated.
This value is not necessarily the price the property would bring if sold.
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. di.
NAME: Larry Thompson
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: August 24, 1989
MEETING DATE: September 5, 1989
CATEGORY: Miscellaneous
SUBJECT: Administrator's Evaluation
EXPLANATION: Per Council policy
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Evaluation Form/Memo - Larry Thompson
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Department Heads
SIGNATO
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATOR'S EVALUATION
DATE: AUGUST 30, 1989
Per its by-laws, the Council is to conduct an annual evaluation of the Administrator.
While there is no set policy as to how the evaluation is to be conducted, previous
Councils have conducted the evaluation as follows.
1. An evaluation form is completed independently by each Councilmember.
2. A form is submitted by each member which is then forwarded to the City
Attorney.
3. The Attorney compiles an average of the evaluations and submits it to the
Council for its review.
4. The Council considers the summary at a regular meeting.
5. Councilmembers discuss the evaluation with the Administrator independently.
I would recommend that the Council follow the same procedure with the following
exceptions:
1. The Council has previously used Attachment A as the evaluation form, while
staff uses Attachment B. While both forms have their advantages, I would
recommend that Attachment B be used. It should be noted that the HRA and
EDC use this form to evaluate the Director.
2. I feel it is extremely important to discuss my performance individually with
each member. Often a lower score may be a misunderstanding or a certain
quirk which can easily be corrected if both parties understand what the
problem is. Therefore, I would request that each Councilmember discuss the
evaluation independently with me.
This matter will be on the September 5, 1989 agenda for discussion.
Lai2Y Thom on
City Administrator
cc: Department Heads
file
{ , -
� 1 (,0I1 f,1 , 4
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF FARMINGTON
NAME:
PERIOD COVERED BY THIS EVALUATION:
Rating Legend: Excellent 1
Good 2
Fair 3
Poor 4
SECTION I - PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS
RATING REMARKS
1 . Leadership
2. Honesty
3. Accountability
4. Initiative
5. Professionalism
E I
6. Courtesy (public, staff and council)
SECTION II - DUTIES
1 . Availability (public, staff and council)
2. Timeliness in carrying out directions
of the Council .
3. Liaison with state, county, metro
council and other higher government
agencies.
4. Liaison with other communities
5. Liaison and support to city commissions
and committees.
6. Coordination with consultants
7. Enforcement of laws and ordinances
8. Supervision of department heads.
9. Administration of Personnel Policy
1
RATING REMARKS
10. Preparation of budget
11 . Administration of budget
12. Administering purchases and
acquisitions
13. Maintaining books and records
14. Developing and issuing administrative
rules, regulations and procedures.
15. General office management
a. Public courtesy by office
employees.
b. Insuring punctuality of
office employees.
c. General office discipline
d. Office efficiency.
SECTION III - SPECIAL EMPHASIS ITEMS
1 . Admistering comp time policy toward council
objectives.
2.
3.
4.
•
Rating by individual council member 1n
Composite rating of council members [ I
City of Farmington
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION FORM
DUE DATE:
NAME: DATE:
DEPARTMENT: JOB TITLE:
Purposes of this Employee Evaluation:
To take a personal inventory, to pin-point weaknesses and strengths and to outline and
agree upon a practical improvement program. Periodically conducted, these Evaluations will
provide a history of development and progress.
Instructions:
Listed below are a number of traits, abilities and characteristics that are important for success in
business. Place an "X" mark on each rating scale, over the descriptive phrase which most nearly
describes the person being rated. (If this form is being used for self-evaluation,you will be describing
yourself.)
Carefully evaluate each of the qualities separately.
Two common mistakes in rating are: (1)A tendency to rate nearly everyone as "average" on every trait
instead of being more critical in judgement. The rater should use the ends of the scale as well as the
middle, and (2) The "Halo Effect," i.e., a tendency to rate the same individual "excellent" on every
trait or"poor" on every trait based on the overall picture one has of the person being rated. However,
each person has strong points and weak points and these should be indicated on the rating scale.
ACCURACY is the correctness of work duties performed.
Makes frequent Careless; makes Usually accurate; Requires little Requires absolute
errors. recurrent errors. makes only average supervision; is exact minimum of
number of mistakes. and precise most of supervision; is almost
the time. always accurate.
ALERTNESS is the ability to grasp instructions, to meet changing conditions and to solve novel
or problem situations.
Slow to "catch on." Requires more than Grasps instructions Usually quick to Exceptionally keen
average instructions with average ability. understand and learn. and alert.
and explanations.
CREATIVITY is talent for having new ideas, for finding new and better ways of doing things and
for being imaginative.
Rarely has a new idea; Occasionally comes Has average Frequently suggests Continually seeks
is unimaginative. up with a new idea. imagination; has new ways of doing new and better ways
reasonable number of things; is very of doing things; is
new ideas. imaginative. extremely
imaginative.
FRIENDLINESS is the sociability and warmth which an individual imparts in his attitude toward
customers, other employees, his supervisor and the persons he may supervise.
Very distant and aloof. Approachable; Warm; friendly; Very sociable and Extremely sociable;
friendly once known sociable. out-going. excellent at
by others. establishing good
will.
PERSONALITY is an individual's behavior characteristics or his personal ability for the job.
Personality Personality Personality Very desirable Outstanding
unsatisfactory for this questionable for this satisfactory for this personality for this personality for this
job. job. job. job. job.
PERSONAL APPEARANCE is the personal impression an individual makes on others. (Con-
sider cleanliness, grooming, neatness and appropriateness of dress on the job.)
Very untidy; poor Sometimes untidy and Generally neat and Careful about Unusually well
taste in dress. careless about clean; satisfactory personal appearance; groomed; very neat;
personal appearance. personal appearance. good taste in dress. excellent taste in
dress.
PHYSICAL FITNESS is the ability to work consistently and with only moderate fatigue. (Con-
sider physical alertness and energy.)
Tires easily; is weak Frequently tires and is Meets physical and Energetic; seldom Excellent health; no
and frail. slow. energy job tires. fatigue.
requirements.
ATTENDANCE is faithfulness in coming to work daily and conforming to work hours.
Often absent without Lax in attendance Usually present and Very prompt; regular Always regular and
good excuse and/or and/or reporting for on time. in attendance. prompt;volunteers for
frequently reports for work on time. overtime when
work late. needed.
HOUSEKEEPING is the orderliness and cleanliness in which an individual keeps his work area.
Disorderly or untidy. Some tendency to be Ordinarily keeps work Quite conscientious Unusually neat, clean
careless and untidy. area fairly neat. about neatness and and orderly.
cleanliness.
DEPENDABILITY is the ability to do required jobs well with a minimum of supervision.
Requires close Sometimes requires Usually takes care of Requires little Requires absolute
supervision; is prompting. necessary tasks and supervision; is minimum of
unreliable. completes with reliable. supervision.
reasonable
promptness.
DRIVE is the desire to attain goals, to achieve.
•
Has poorly defined Sets goals too low; Has average goals and Strives hard; has high Sets high goals and
goals and acts puts forth little effort usually puts forth desire to achieve. strives incessantly to
without purpose; puts to achieve. effort to reach these. reach these.
forth practically no
effort.
JOB KNOWLEDGE is the information concerning work duties which an individual should know
for a satisfactory job performance.
Poorly informed about Lacks knowledge of Moderately informed; Understands all Has complete
work duties. some phases of work. can answer most phases of work. mastery of all phases
common questions. of job.
QUANTITY OF WORK is the amount of work an individual does in a work day.
Does not meet Does just enough to Volume of work is Very industrious;does Superior work
minimum get by. satisfactory. more than is required. production record.
requirements.
STABILITY is the ability to withstand pressure and to remain calm in crisis situations.
Goes "to pieces" Occasionally Has average tolerance Tolerates most Thrives under
under pressure; is "blows up" under for crises; usually pressure; likes crises pressure; really
"jumpy" and nervous. pressure; is easily remains calm. more than the average enjoys solving crises.
irritated. person.
COURTESY is the polite attention an individual gives other people.
Blunt; discourteous; Sometimes tactless. Agreeable and Always very polite and Inspiring to others in
antagonistic. pleasant. willing to help. being courteous and
very pleasant.
OVERALL EVALUATION in comparison with other employees with the same length of
service on this job.
Definitely Substandard but Doing an average job. Definitely above Outstanding.
unsatisfactory. making progress. average.
SECTION II • Development Plan
This section enables you to construct a development plan in line with the career expectations communicated in
Section I, by addressing the key strengths and weaknesses diagnosed in Section II.
RELATIVE STRENGTHS SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BETTER UTILIZING EMPLOYEE'S STRENGTHS
RELATIVE WEAKNESSES SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING EMPLOYEE'S CURRENT JOB PERFORMANCE
OVERALL COMMENTS:
EMPLOYEE COMMENTS:
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM WILL BE USED TO SUPPORT PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT RELATED DECISIONS.IT ALSO MAY
BE PROVIDED IN INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFIABLE FORM FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES WHEN NEEDED TO EVALUATE THE QUALITY OF THE APPRAISAL
SYSTEM AND ITS ADMINISTRATION,IN WHICH CASE IT WILL BE AGGREGATED WITHOUT INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFICATION.IF ANY FURTHER DISCLOSURE
OF THIS INFORMATION IS MADE, IT WILL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CORPORATE POLICIES ON DATA PRIVACY.
This appraisal has been reviewed and discussed with the employee:
EMPLOYEE SUPERVISOR CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE DATE DATE