Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.19.88 Council Packet AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. APPROVE MINUTES a. September 6, 1988 4. CITIZENS COMMENTS 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Set Public Hearing - Vacate Utility/Drainage Easement - Dakota Estates 4th b. 7: 15 P.M. - TIF Development District #1 (Duo Plastics) c. Set Public Hearing - Discuss the Preliminary Plat of Country Hills 6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Donation to Minnesota Valley Humane Society b. Proclamation - Fire Prevention Week 7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS a. Prohibiting Fires or Barbeques on Balconies of Multifamily Dwelling Units b. Accepting Assessment Roll - Calling for a Public Hearing - Project 88-2 c. Accepting Assessment Roll - Calling for a Public Hearing - Project 88-3 d. Resolution Amending R1-88 - Setting Fees on Sign Permits e. Dangerous Dog Ordinance 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Non-Conforming Signs b. Foreman Position - General Services c. Whispering River 9. NEW BUSINESS a. Sidewalk Inventory b. Redraft of Developers Agreement 10. MISCELLANEOUS a. Appoint Planning Commission/PARAC Member 11. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approve Capital Outlay Request - Radios - Fire Department b. Approve Capital Outlay Request - General Services c. Approve School and Conference Requests - General Services d. Approve Payment of the Bills 12. ADJOURN 13. ADD ON a. 1988 Street and Utility Project - Change Order b. Paving Shoulder on 220th Street MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEMS DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1988 5a. Memo/Resolution/Hearing Notice enclosed. b. I still have not received an update on this matter. It may be necessary to continue the hearing. c. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the plat last evening. Additional information relating to the plat will be submitted Monday evening. It is recommended that the hearing be set at that time. 6a. Request enclosed. b. Proclamation enclosed. 7a. Memo/Ordinance enclosed. b. Various information enclosed. c. Various information enclosed. d. Memo enclosed. 8a. Memo enclosed. b. Memo/Job Description enclosed. c. Memo enclosed. 9a. Memo enclosed. b. Memo/language enclosed. 10a. Application enclosed. lla. Request enclosed. b. Request enclosed. c. Request enclosed. d. Copy enclosed. 13a. Request enclosed. b. Memo enclosed. .r Lar Thomp on City Administrator cc: Department Heads file i AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. a. NAME: Larry Thompson DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: September 8, 1988 MEETING DATE: September 19, 1988 CATEGORY: Requests, Communications, etc. SU3JECT: Mike Shannon - Minnesota Valley Humane Society - Donation from City EXPLANATION: Mr. Shannon would like the City to donate funds to the Minnesota Valley Humane Society Animal Shelter per the provisions of MS Ch. 343. REFERENCE MATERIALS/RESPONSIBILITY: Background - Larry Thompson REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Dan Siebenaler Police file SIGNATURE SEP 1 4191a r September 13, 1988 Farmington City Hall Attn: Larry Thompson 325 Oak St. Farmington, MN 55024 Dear Mr. Thompson, The Minnesota Valley Humane Society requests the opportunity to be put on your agenda for the next Budget hearing to present their proposal. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, Af Michael J. Shannon 13313 Lakeview Drive Burnsville, MN 55337 ,Yf M . it Y .,, i • TION OF CRUELTY PREVENTION OF CRUELTY § 343.11 •4 is 1975 Amendment. Removed references to humane societies to assist in" for "the duty of ' nbers other than ex offi- . child protection and deleted "dumb" as it was the Minnesota humane society to secure"; delet- i .4 s provided in section 15: used to describe "animals" in two places within ed "and the appointment of local and state - • Litt- he . terms of two initial the section. agents," following "county societies"; and sub- r ire i each of 1979, 1980, and 1977 Amendment. Substituted "Minnesota stituted "representation in the state federation" , t; r'" ie seventh initial member humane society" for "state bureau of animal .. '-. iety . •t f, ie members of the board protection." for .representation in the state soc lair and other officers as 1987 Legislation stings must be called by The 1987 amendment substituted"the purpose to other members. The of the state federation of county and district executive director who sified civil service at the 343.07. Repealed by Laws 1977, C. 264, § 5, eff. July 1, 1977 executive director may 5. shall serve in the unclas- Prior to repeal this section was amended by commissioner of admin. Laws 1975, c. 369, § 5. � f the executive director '¢ with necessary office services,and the board 343.08. Repealed by Laws 1987, c. 394, § 14, eff. June 4, 1987 ,.1; j +, missioner for the cost." $$ 87, c. 394 provides Prior to repeal the section was amended by: Laws 1977, c. 264, § 3. Laws 1978, c. 674, § 37. Laws 1975, c. 369, § 6. ;; administration shall, on Laws 1977, c. 332, § 14. ections 1 to 11, begins le corporation known as 343.09. Repealed by Laws 1977, c. 264, § 5, eff. July 1, 1977 r society, confirmed and : itatutes, section 343.01: J e federation of county Prior to repeal this section was amended by >, Laws 1973, C. 492, § 14. the prevention of cruel- hr tered its incorporation Via:? ate, the commissioner 343.10. County and district societies ,,,.�: of the dissolved corpo 1}'' orporation as provided A'county society for the prevention of cruelty to animals may be formed in any county , . missioner shall accept and a district society for the prevention of cruelty to animals may be formed in any group made to the dissolved of two or more contiguous or noncontiguous counties or parts of counties by not less than i 'ed after its dissolution seven incorporators . County and district societies shall be created as corporations under e terms of the donation chapter 317 and as provided in the bylaws of the state federation. successor corporation. Amended by Laws 1975, c. 369, § 7; Laws 1987, c. 394, § 5, eff. June 4, 1987. 4 transferred to the suc- l to the donor or the1975 Amendment. Removed a reference to less than seven incorporators, and the members, s child protection. at a meeting called for that purpose, may elect E. 1987 Legislation not less than three of their number directors, •#'; Laws 1977,c.332, The 1987 amendment revised the section which who shall continue in office until their succes- previously read: sors have qualified." "County societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals may be formed in any county by not 7 _; E. 343.11. Acquisition of property, appropriations x 13.05 was amended by Every county and district society for the prevention of cruelty to animals may acquire, by purchase, gift, grant, or devise, and hold, use, or convey, real estate and personal property, and lease, mortgage, sell, or use the same in any manner conducive to its interest, to the same extent as natural persons. The county board of any county, or the humane societies to council of any city,in which such societies exist, may,in its discretion,appropriate for the • i,kx maintenance and support of such societies in the transaction of the work for which they .nimals; to assist in are organized, any sums of money not otherwise appropriated, not to exceed in any one ntation in the state year the sum of$4,800 or the sum of 50 cents per capita based upon the county's or city's - `" f the laws for the population as of the most recent federal census, whichever is greater; provided, that no ind to promote the part of the appropriation shall be expended for the payment of the salary of any officer of mals. the society. aws 1987,c.394,§ 4, Amended by Laws 1973, c. 123, art. 5, § 7; Laws 1973, c. 187, § 1; Laws 1975, c. 369, § 8; Laws 1985, c. 69, § 1, eff. May 7, 1985; Laws 1987, c. 394, § 6, eff.June 4, 1987. )`-`• 83 ,.•, X- ' ;f I I1 i 1 September 1988 IPROPOSAL FROM MINNESOTA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY TABLE OF CONTENTS I II . Proposal 1 III. History 1 III. Shelter Campaign 2 I IV. Review of Services and Capacities of the Proposed Shelter 3 IV. Current Organization of the Executive Board 4 VI. Financial Information (86/87 - 88/89) Income 5 IExpenditures/Administrative 5 VII. Summary Report (April 1, 1987 - March 31, 1988) 6 IVIII. Committee Financial Reports Membership 6 I Education 6 Program 6 Public Relations 6 Newsletter 7 I Investigations 7 Adoptions 7 Shelter 7 IFund Raising 7, 8 IX. Budget for 1988/89 I Expenditures 8 Income 9 X. Proposed Operational Expenses for Shelter 9 IXI. Proposed Revenue Sources for Operational Costs 9 II MINNESOTA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ' OF DAKOTA COUNTY ' I. PROPOSAL: It is proposed by the Minnesota Valley Humane Society, a private, non-profit corporation of the State of Minnesota, to construct and operate a full-service animal shelter facility within Dakota County, the programs and services of which will be accessible and available to the residents of the cities of the county. ' It is requested by the Minnesota Valley Humane Society that the cities support the capital development of the proposed structure and its maintainance in accordance I with the provisions of Minnesota Animal Welfare Statute 343. 11 as amended by HF 656 if the 1985 Legislature. This statute allows for the amount of . 50. per capita of the population of each of the cities. II. HISTORY ' The first. orga.nization -meeting of the Society was held in March 1981 and was incorporated on April 29, 1981. The ' Minnesota Valley Humane Society was organized as stated in its Bylaws for the following purposes: to secure enforcement of the laws for the prevention of wrongs to animals and to promote the education of the public regarding animal welfare and to help in alleviating all .infer ings to all animal life. ' In order to accomplish these goals the following objectives were established : ' 1 . To build and operate a Dakota County Animal Shelter 2. To educate the public regarding proper animal care ' 3. To encourage the proper identification and vaccination of all animals 4. To promote the spaying and neutering of animals 5. To conduct cruelty and abuse investigations ' 6. . To provide adoption and lost and found services • ' The Society has engaged in a number of fundraising activities in order to reach the financial position which w. uld enable it to realize its goal of an actual Shelter. ' Fundraisers which have been successful and have become annual events include: an All Breed Dog show in April, a Woofer and Hoofer run/walk competition in the Fall , a Craft and Bake sale during the Christmas season, and garage sales in the Spring and Fall. A number of other events are scheduled, but do not occur on an annual basis. Members of the Society have participated in Community Education events, made presentations in local schools or 1 to small groups on request. Members have also made visits with animals to nursing homes in the county. tFor over two years the Society accepted animals for adoption that were housed at American Boarding Kennel in Burnsville or in foster homes. The Society successfully placed over 600 animals, but the need for shelter quickly outgrew our physical resources and we were forced to suspend the Adoption Program in July of 1986. At this time the Society Board voted to focus all efforts on a shelter. SHELTER CAMPAIGN The Society originally approached Dakota County and the City Councils of the ten largest cities in 1986 for assistance in funding a shelter under Minnesota Statute 343. 11. At that time the County gave acme indication that they might he able to assist with land acquisition, but not funding. The Councils at that time requested that we wait until all the presentations to the various cities before they would be willing to make any decisions. Subsequent to ' that the Society ws invited to send a member to a _ breakfast meeting of the Mayors group in West St. Paul. Jacki Zschokke attended this meeting and made the presenta- tion as requested. The City Council which were approached included: Eagan, Burnsville, Apple Valley, Rosemount, West St. Paul , ' Lakeville, Hastings, Mendota Heights, Inver Grove Heights, and South St. Paul. Activities of the shelter committee since the Mayor's meeting 1 have been: 1. We engaged the services of a management consultant through the Management Assistance Project to assist us in the development of a Long Range Strategic Plan. ' 2. We consulted a financial counselor to assist us in the investment of our shelter monies. We currently have monies invested with First Investors. ' 3. We have contracted with a private donor to provide a gift of $200, 000 to be matched by the Society for the construction and operation of a Shelter. 2 4. We have received three bids from architectual firms in order to project actual costs of construction. a. Tushie, Montgomery & Associates ' b. Freerks, Sperl, Flynn Architects c. Ritter, Suppes, Plautz/Architects, Ltd. ' 5. We have continued to work with the County representa- tive to secure land for a construction site. We are also reviewing other options for land including property held by the Minnesota Zoological Society and will also be approaching the Minnesota Zoo Board for potential building site. ' 6. We have ongoing consultation from a local attorney to provide legal advice. 7. We have consulted a certified public accountant to assist us in financial record keeping and tax guidelines for non-profit groups. 8. We have explored the use of martketing firms to assist with our advertising and direct mail efforts. 9. We are following up our initial presentations with this one in order to continue to seek financial assistance under Minnesota Statute 343. 11 . IV. iZEVTEW OF SERVICES AND CAPACITIES OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY The shelter facitlity as proposed is an approximate 9200 square foot structure, combining animal receiving, holding, examination, adoption and euthanization areas with attached but separate, administration and public meeting areas. Its capacity for animals will be about 13, 000 per year, with a maximum daily capacity of 146 animals. The method of ' euthanization will be injection, universally accepted as the most humane of various methods in use. ' The humane society will operate an expanded investigations division, utilizing State-licensed investigators who will respond to complaints of abuse to animals and work ' cooperatively with the local law enforcement agencies in the resolution of complaints. The facility will sponsor rabies vaccination clinics ' administered by cooperating veterinarians who will issue appropriate certificates. Shelter personnel will assist in the identification, recovery and observation of animals that ' have bitten people or where rabies is a potential hazard. The shelter will provide a centralized, county-wide "Lost; and Found" service greatly increasing the odds of lost 3 I ' pets being recovered by their owners. A shelter will provide Minnesota Valley Humane Society with the capability of animal control management, which we otherwise will not have. All animal receiving and adoption services will be available. ' Public education programs, designed to familiarize people of all ages with information on animals and their ' care both on-site and throughout the county. Based on costs for the recently constructed Anoka Shelter it is estimated that the structure itself would cost between ' $450, 000 to 500, 000. Construction proposed to begin in the Spring of 1990. ' V. CURRENT ORGANIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD We have increased from a seven member to a fifteen member Board and are currently seeking a veterinarian to be a Board member. ' We are also currently seeking an Executive Director based on the recommendations of the management consultant and input from other metro-county societies. ' OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES President Beverly Shannon ' Vice President Kevin Thode Secretary trudi-Johnson-Richards Treasurer Sharon Meyer tMembership Bill Roske Fund Raising Mike Shannon Finance Sharon Meyer ' Education Ila Roske Advertising Joy Hartman Newsletter (open) ' Public Relations (open) Animal Welfare Kathleen Gilbertson ' Investigations Shelter Kathleen Gilbertson Jacqueline Zschokke Adoptions (open) 1 I 4 II 11 IIVT. F I N AN C;I AL INFORMATION • IIINCOME I 86-87 87-88 88-89 (YTD/7-31) I DONATIONS 3943. 00 3720. 00 1282. 00 DONATIONS SHELTER 17378. 91 9026. 82 9154. 65 OTHER 2543. 70 4000. 63 3287. 98 II SALES/ADOPTIONS 3645. 00 9803. 22 `281. 00 FUNDRAISERS 9176. 22 3144. 19 4138. 44 MISC. INCOME 150. 00 - - ' INTEREST 68 1.57 2095. 99 _ 1042. 41 II TOTAL 37518. 40 31790. 85 19186. 48 INVESTMENTS 30000. 00 7000. 00 II IIEXPENDITURES/ADMINISTRATIVE PHONE 677. 73 668. 35 650. 00 POSTAGE 1123. 15 64. 09 171. 50 II POST OFFICE BOX 22. 00 `29. 00 39. 00 INSURANCE 1648. 28 1261. 00 1130. 00 PRINTING 1248. 92 12. 25 100. 00 I DUES - 50. 00 50. 00 TAXES 1199. 77 294. 78 - OTHER 247. 42 97. 00 75. 00 I STATE REGIS. INVESTMENT - 25. 00 25. 00 COMMMISSION - 1128. 00 210. 00 IITOTAL 6167. 27 3629. 47 2450. 50 II The expenditures in the 86-87 column represent total expenses I for the organization, but the last two columes only represent administrative expenses. Committee expenses have been reported separately since 87-88 fiscal year. I I 5 II II II VII. SUMMARY REPORT (April 1, 1987- March 31, 1988) I ._R NE:NUE SALES 13523. 22 I DONATIONS 16171. 64 INTEREST 2095. 99 II TOTAL REVENUE 31790. 85 IIEXPENDITURES ADVERTISING 9857. 95 I ANIMAL CARE 85. 13 CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 100. 00 DEPRECIATION 124. 00 I INSURANCE 1261. 00 INVESTMENT COMMISSION 1128. 00 LICENSES/FEES 290. 00 OFFICE/POSTAGE 441. 37 II PRINTING 847. 44 RENT/FACILITIES 625. 00 SALES TAX 294. 78 II SUPPLIES 3721. 19 TELEPHONE 668. 35 IITOTAL EXPENDITURES 19444. 21 NET INCOME 12346. 64 II VIII. COMMITTEE FINANCIAL REPORT II (April 1, 1987 - March 30, 1988) MEMBERSHIP II Revenue 3720. 00 Expenditures 4.45. Net income/( loss) 3274. 67 iEDUCATION Revenue - II Expenditures 24. 50 Net income/( loss) (264. 50) PROGRAM IIPUBLIC RELATIONS II 6 I I II NEWSLETTER Revenue - Expenditures t5.56__72.1__ Net income/( loss) (556. 72) IIINVESTIGATIONS Revenue I Expenditures ?._iQ_ Net income/( loss) (37. 10) I ADOPTIONS Revenue 135. 00 Expenditures Net income/( loss) 135. 00 IISHELTER Revenue/Donations 9026. 82 I Interest _1932_ 12 Total 10958. 94 Expenditures Advertising 7527. 72 II Animal care _ 85. 13 Total 7612. 85 Net profit/( loss) 3346. 09 IFUND RAISING Dog Show Revenue 2918. 85 Expenditures 1674-52 Net prof it/( loss) 1244. 23 II Donations 4000. 63 I Garage Sales Revenue 935. 87 Expenditures _ _ __ _ Net profit/( loss) 935. 87 II Woofer Hoofer Revenue 3315. 24 I Expenditures _13.30. 29 Net profit/( loss) 11 Craft & Bake Sales Revenue 470. 60 Expenditures _89.11 Net profit/( loss) 381. 43 IIRaffle Revenue 1910. 00 I Expenditures 732. 7 Net profit/( loss) 1177. 25 I 7 I 11 ' Softball Revenue 609. 75 Expenditures ' __541-.Q' 1 Net profit/( loss) 68. 70 Carwash Revenue 373. 50 IIExpenditures 22.Q...5_6.Net profit/( loss) 152. 94 1 Telethon Revenue 259. 00 not all revenue Expenditures Lam , received within Net profit/( loss) (256. 31) accounting period IGeneral Sales Revenue 504. 50 I Expenditures 74Z.. i&. Net profit/( loss) (237. 68) I General Revenue 848. 94 Expenditures __ Net profit/( loss) 848. 94 IIReal Estate Promotion Revenue 476. 72 I Expenditures 137. 50 Net profit/( loss) 339. 22 I Dog Wash Revenue 189.44 Expenditures - Net profit/( loss) 189. 44 II I IX. BUDGET FOR APRIL 1, 1988 - MARCH 31, 1989 EXPENDITURES (as of July 31, 1988) . 1 Net profit/( loss) MEMBERSHIP 44. 95 1237. 05 I EDUCATION 250. 20 ( 187. 20) PROGRAM 25. 00 (25. 00) NEWSLETTER 174. 60 ( 174. 60) I SHELTER ADOPTION 8923. 53 4296. 53 172. 92 408. 15 DOG SHOW 1199. 48 1855. 96 DONATION CANS 150. 00 684. 83 I RAFFLE 247. 66 585. 34 SALES/MISC 15. 94 40. 06 I TOTAL 11188. 34 8721. 12 8 II II INCOME IProjected gross income Actual YTD . (July 31) IMANAGEMENT -0- 2300. 00 MEMBERSHIP 4000. 00 1282. 00 EDUCATION 0 63. 00 II PROGRAM 0 0 PUBLIC RELATIONS 0 0 NEWSLETTER 0 0 I ANIMAL WELFARE INVESTIGATIONS 0 0 SHELTER 40000. 00 13154. 65 I ADOPTION FUNDRAISERS 500. 00 408. 15 DOG SHOW 3000. 00 3055. 44 DONATION CANS 4000. 00 834. 83 II GARAGE SALE 900. 00 250. 00 WOOFER HOOFER 4000. 00 0 CRAFT AND BAKE 550. 00 0 I RAFFLE 900. 00 833. 00 PROMOTION ITEMS 1500. 00 465. 00 GENERAL 0 56. 00 I INTEREST 444Q,n4_ �_--_ 1042. 1 L_ TOTAL 63350. 00 22462. 48 II X. PROPOSED OPERATIONAL EXPENSES FOR SHELTER Medical-supplies, vet care $75, 000 I Staff wages $50, 000 Utilities $30, 000 Insurance $20, 000 I Vehicle maintenance $ :i, ©0O Miscellaneous $ 5, 000 $185, 000 ' XI. PROPOSED REVENUE SOURCES FOR OPERATIONAL COSTS 1 Surrender and Adoption Fees Donations and Grants Membership Dues Fundraising I Impounding fees from city contracts Retail sales of promotion items I I II9 l r 1 AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. (ROL' kv-i--- -- 1 NAME: Tom Kaldunski DEPARTMENT: General Services 1b b A.,.,--� --- ► DATE: September 13, 1988 MEETING DATE: September 19, 1988 CATEGORY: New Business SU3JECT: Sidewalk Inventory EXPLANATION: I have completed my sidewalk inventory and I will present my recommendations and ideas for a sidewalk program. REFERENCE MATERIALS/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo/Map - Tom Kaldunski REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Tom Kaldunski General Services .(3 41.6614.11:, SIGNATURE 61-- , MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: SIDEWALK INVENTORY DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1988 Last spring the Council requested that I complete an inventory of the existing sidewalks and report on the condition and required maintenance. Attached is a map of the City's urban area with existing sidewalks shown. The map indicates existing sidewalk that is in need of replacement. It also indicates proposed sidewalks that should be constructed in the near future to eliminate pedestrian traffic on existing streets. The need for new walks is based on current pedestrian traffic patterns and focal points which attract pedestrian traffic (such as schools, downtown, swimming pool, arena, bike trails, fast food restaurants, fairgrounds, etc.) . In order to repair the existing sidewalk system, it is estimated that 7,000 sq. ft. should be replaced. The estimated cost for these repairs is $17,500. Funding levels should be at approximately $3,500 - $4,000/year to repair the existing problem areas in a 5 year program. Recent budgets have been in the $1,000 - $1,500 level. The proposed additions to the sidewalks consist of approximately 50,000 sq. ft. The estimated cost for these sidewalk improvements is $125,000. It is not likely that the proposed sidewalk improvements can be funded through the department budget, and therefore the most likely source of funding is through assessments to benefited properties. I would recommend that the Council direct staff to research the sidewalk improvement policy in other communities and to present a policy for the City Council to adopt at a later date. A sidewalk improvement policy could be incorporated into the City's current assessment policy. The policy should address options such as whether work can be done by homeowners vs City contractors, annual inspections and repair notices, funding, making sidewalk improvements in conjunction with street and utility projects, etc. It should be noted that when the City has identified problem areas in sidewalks, that a plan of action to correct the deficiencies should be implemented as soon as practical to reduce liability exposure. A-ri-s-41ktiLwryLL_ Tom Kaldunski City Engineer cc: file Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke TJK it :7_1 i ___1 • 1 1 • i LINDEN ST I I 1 1 l W . JJ STI MU ••% 'is ,‘. a r_____ . i I irk- c. . ____ _, aiti .iii_J_LiI J t ST. LI 7-1:r 111111111-7:Lr— riTT1 - ter �' • Q h1 I�II�1 1 1S TI l ---___Th7; i 1 iii • � 1 11 M1111111Hiilliii [ m'I l iM � CD. �RD. 72‘ • \ II . , - �11111111' d 1 1 1 11 11 1 I I 1 II I I S.TI 11 IP1 _ ,. ED H O S P I TA I RKI D.4 \ •, Thiti1- ijitiiiiii L11 1,� t1ih1 r t. _. _MED. 1111111 \ X91 CLINIC ty L...•... 111 1Illictl1 r..., •ICE : 1iffluiIir71illARENA , 1 1 111111111L. E-4 ,4 tlLTl1fFHEz tfF-1- .. . l 111 111 1 11111 L__ _111 11 I i _I f111111 I III = FAA 1111 I1 1J I 4Y1! 1I 1. I 1 RE1111 1 CENTER � 1111111 XI I SCHOOL _ 1 • i 1. 1 _ ILOCUSTI11II tt-,-Ai t I SCHOOL - _- - `r. - _I l 111 I „ fila.)LE ST: J eX.TRAIL IT.! r1i" 1 I 1 1MPLEI II � �" SCHOOL -I US v7 Z J � 1 1.___1111 � ; PARK � � HE I 1 1 N MI ',Li—'41r.1 . ' n NIC ORS ST V_ MUM Mil � f�� ^� - , +ICKORY ST. II ���Fdaritti N U' I „, u., ,-= • l. - z ' • I 1 ----i- 1 1 -- , 1 -, . TH0 ,___:.„ ....,-,........ 'H ST. 7' CO. RD. NO. 74 _____ ___I 711 _ SUNNYSIOE CIR• r � O 1 1 -:_ r �- DAKOTA COUNTY . NW ' — 1 / - —, FAIR GROUNDS �� t ,um • illinliffillii c- _ , 111/NOF SII 4 URBAN AREA MAP ,_ FAIR IE '11 all V,,e�l. CITY OF FARMINGTON I HERI?AGE wAY --I _ _ SIDEWALKS '� N CITY 1 1 � 1 - T j -----n- 2 / 8 / 88 I 'RIITAGE, \,Y AY 7--,_ �_ �L�W N_ PARK _ 1 REVISED 9 / 14/88 1 , 1 1 , , 1 -�- 1 EXISTING SIDEWALKS * EXISTING SIDEWALKS -- NEEDING MAINTENANCE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS J + AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. 1 -4")-19 NAME: Tom Kaldunski X;i114— DEPARTMENT: General Services (/ DATE: September 14, 1988 (PPae4, A MEETING DATE: September 19, 1988 CATEGORY: Add On SU3JECT: Paving Shoulder on 220th Street EXPLANATION: I've received a request for paving the shoulder on 220th Street East of Denmark. This project had been discussed with the _ County in 1987. The County indicated a willingness to complete the shoulders if the City shares in funding (45/55) . It could be done in conjunction with the REFERENCE MATERIALS/RESPONSIBILITY: 1988 Street and Utility Project. Memo - Tom Kaldunski REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Tom Kaldunski General Services SIGNATURE 4t1C IF f1 s MIMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: PAVING SHOULDER OF 220TH STREET (COUNTY ROAD 74) DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1988 I have received a number of requests to pave the gravel shoulders on 220th Street between the railroad tracks and Denmark Avenue. I have approached Dave Everds, Dakota County Highway Engineer about the project. Mr. Everds has indicated that the County is willing to do a joint project with the City on a 45/55 split as per County policy. I had hoped to complete the job as part of the County's Spot Overlay Program. Under this program, Mr. Everds estimated that it would cost approximately $4,000. Unfortunately, the County has completed the 1988 Spot Overlay Program and, if the County is to do the project, it would be in 1989. Since the City is into the 1988 Street Project, I decided to estimate the cost utilizing our unit prices bid. For comparison, I've prepared the following table. Item Qty. County Proj. City Street Project AC-1 Bituminous Material 11.5 tons $140/ton= $1605 $128/ton = $1472 2341 Bit. Wear Course Mix 188 tons $11.78/ton = $2215 $10. 15/ton = $1908 TOTAL $3,820.00 $3,380.00 Based upon this comparison, it appears that the shoulder paving could be completed this year in conjunction with our Street Project. The City's share of the funding would come from our "Road and Bridge Fund" (State Aid) . I would recommend that the Council authorize an agreement with the County to pave the shoulders on the 45/55 split and that I be authorized to receive a quote from the paving contractor for this work. As long as the contractor utilized the unit prices bid, it appears that it would be less expensive to do the paving this Fall in conjunction with the 1988 Street Project. r (Ov\ Tom Kaldunski City Engineer cc: file Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke TJK MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: PAVE SHOULDER - 220TH STREET DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 As a follow up to my earlier memo, I contacted Pine Bend Paving, the subcontractor for our 1988 Street and Utility Project. The following outlines the contractor's quote for the work. WORK TO BE DONE Cut Existing Edge of Bituminous 1,800 if Remove 2" of Existing Gravel Shoulder 115 cy Place 2" Bituminous Shoulder 225 tons TOTAL QUOTE = $6,990.00 I've discussed the project with Dave Everds, Dakota County Highway Engineer and he feels the project could be done for less ($4,584.00 for 1800 if x 10 ft) by waiting until next year and allowing the County to do the work under the Spot Overlay Program. Because of the lower cost, I agree. Therefore, I recommend that the paving of the shoulders on County Road 74 from Denmark east to the railroad tracks be completed in 1989 with the County Spot Overlay Program. I would like to have Council authorization to set this project into place for next year. The City will be sharing the cost on a 45/55 basis and funding should be designated at this time. Tom Kaldunski City Engineer cc: file Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke TJK