The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12.05.88 Council Packet AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR DECEMBER 5, 1988 • 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. APPROVE MINUTES 4. CITIZENS COMMENTS 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS a. Ordinance Allowing Partial Payment of Special Assessments b. Resolution Approving 1989 CDBG Grant Application 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Organizational Chart b. Building Needs Study c. Recount Costs 9. NEW BUSINESS a. Approval of Licenses and Permits b. Solid Waste Rate Increase c. Budget Adjustments - 1988 10. MISCELLANEOUS a. Review Report on Southeast Farmington Groundwater b. 1989 Wages 11. CONSENT AGENDA a. Capital Outlay Request - Parks and Recreation b. Capital Outlay Budget Transfer - Police Department c. School and Conference Request - Police Department d. School and Conference Request - Police Department e. School and Conference Request - General Services f. Approve Payment of the Bills 12. ADJOURN THE AGENDA IS CLOSED OUT AT NOON ON THE TUESDAY PRECEDING THE MEETING. i MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEMS DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1988 7a. Memo/Ordinance enclosed. b. Memo enclosed. 8a. Memo enclosed. b. Memo/Proposal enclosed. c. Information sent previously. 9a. Permit applications enclosed. b. Memo enclosed. c. Memo/Adjustments enclosed. 10a. Memo/Report enclosed. b. Memo enclosed. lla. Copy enclosed. b. I have reviewed the request from Chief Siebenaler and feel I do not have enough information to approve the request. I have requested that the Finance Director provide additional information. If I am not satisfied with the response I will ask that this item be pulled. c. Request enclosed. d. Request enclosed. e. Request enclosed. f. Copy enclosed. L `rry Thpson City Administrator cc: Department Head AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. NAME: Larry Thompson DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: November 23,1988 MEETING DATE: December 5, 1988 CATEGORY: Unfinished Business SUBJECT: Building Needs Study EXPLANATION: Consider request by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Proposal/Recommendation - Larry Thompson REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Department Heads , SIGNA y f ' 40, 444‘. '„ December 12, 1988 Robert W. Rosene, P.E. Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik 2335 W. Trunk Hwy 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 Dear Mr. Rosene, Please be advised that the Council has accepted your proposed Public Works Building Needs Study as outlined in your November 18, 1988 letter, with the clarification that Point #8 be clarified to state review size of present "General Services" building and comment. . . . Also, the Council would like the study completed by February 6, 1989 regular meeting. It would be appreciated if you would contact me as soon as possible so that we can set up a meeting with staff and begin working on the project. Yours truly, Larry Thompson City Administrator cc: Department Heads file eihjej Fauicucgfac 325 Oak Skeet • Fau.ciigfex, Ntrt 55024 • (612) 463-7111 OW Otto G.Bonestroo,P.E. Keith A.Gordon,P.E. Thomas W.Peterson,P.E. Daniel J.Edgerton,P.E. 1110 Bones t roo Robert W.Rosene,P.E. Richard W.Foster,P.E. Michael C.Lynch,P.E. Mark A.Seip,P.E. • Joseph C.Anderlik,P.E. Donald C.Burgardt,P.E. James R.Maland,P.E. Philip J.Caswell,P.E. ' Bradford A.Lemberg,P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. Kenneth P.Anderson,P.E. Mark D.Wallis,P.E. ° k A. Rosene James C.Olson,RE. Tedhard E.Turner,RE. rK.FieldnR.E. RE. Mark R.RooIfs,RE Bachmann,P.E. Leo Charles��sky n Anderlik & Glenn R.Cook,P.E. Michael T.Rautmann,P.E. Robert C.Russek,A.I.A. Harlan M.Olson Thomas E.Noyes,P.E. Robert R.Pfefferle,P.E. Thomas E.Angus,P.E. Susan M.Eberlin,C.P.A. Associates Robert G.Schunicht,P.E. David O.Loskota,P.E. Howard A.Sanford,P.E. Marvin L.Sorvala,P.E. Engineers & Architects November 18, 1988 NOV 2 11988 Mr. Larry Thompson, Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Re: Public Works Building Study Farmington, MN File No. 141 Dear Larry, In accordance with your request, we have prepared the following work plan for a study of the Farmington Public Works Building needs. It is proposed that the study will be provided at our standard hourly rates and would cover the following items: 1. Meet with City Staff to develop list of spaces and equipment for their building. Obtain a list of all trucks, graders and other equipment with dimensions, weights and special requirements. 2. Document the site conditions and prepare graphic site analysis. 3. Analyze and document the building code and zoning criteria. 4. Summarize all information listed above into a project program listing all requirements that a building design must meet in order to be successful for the City of Farmington. 5. Prepare a rough draft of floor plan and image study based on the design criteria in the project program. 6. Finalize schematic floor plan and image study based on review with City Staff and Council. 7. Make "hardware studies" comparing various methods and materials of con- struction. At a minimum, compare "pole type" construction with masonry construction. Page 1. 25 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 f � y City of Farmington November 18, 1988 Farmington, MN Re: File No. 141 6;s40 S. - 8. Review size of presentisaserrWbuilding and comment on its suitability for public works purposes. (No detailed analysis of the condition of the building nor layouts are expected to be made.) 9. Prepare preliminary cost estimates for the building design generated in step 6 in each of two contrasting construction systems. 10. Compare advantages and disadvantages of each construction system relative to the estimated construction costs. 11. Summarize the design process and the conclusions drawn from step 10 in written and graphic form in a bound report. Illustrations will include a floor plan, cross-section and image study of the proposed building. 12. It is estimated that a budget of $3,500.00 to $4,000.00 will be required to properly cover the items listed above. Please advise if the above outline properly covers the study which you had in mind. Our staff will be glad to meet with you to make any modifications which you deem advisable. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert W. Rosene RWR:li Page 2. 25 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: PROPOSED BUILDING NEEDS STUDY DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1988 Per Council directive, staff has obtained a building needs study proposal from the consulting engineer. As you will note, the proposal quotes a price range of $3,500 to $4,000. As you may recall, the Council set aside $4,000 for such a study. I would like to add language stating that the consultant will compare new construction versus existing buildings in town. It is recommended that the study be authorized with the abovementioned language change. 1 °Wv ‘ArriL41114(j34(ligi Larry Thompson City Administrator cc: Department Heads