HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.01.85 Council Packet AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
APRIL 1, 1985
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVE AGENDA
3. APPROVE MINUTES
a. March 11, 1985
b. March 18, 1985
4. CITIZENS COMMENTS
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Ambulance Service Agreement
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Fire Code Variance - Faith Methodist Church/School District 192
b. Dakota County Landfill Abatement Assistance Funding
c. Consider Computer Proposal from Teleterminal, Inc.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
a. 1983/84 SCDBG - Policy Clarification
b. 4 Wheel Drive Unit - Review
c. CIP - Background Financial Information
11. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Approve Requests to Attend Fire Sectional School.
b. Approve Payment of the Bills.
12. ADJOURN
THE AGENDA IS CLOSED OUT AT NOON ON THE TUESDAY PRECEDING THE MEETING.
13. ADD ON
a. Consent Agenda - Pool Deck Repair
b. New Business - Police Officers Labor Agreement - Final Position
c. Consent Agenda - Capital Outlay Request - Air Compressor
d. Dakota County Multifamily Bond Pool Program - Gil Gilbertson
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEMS
DATE: MARCH 28, 1985
8a. Memo from Administrator enclosed.
9a. Memo from Administrator enclosed.
b. Memo from Administrator enclosed.
c. Memo from Administrator and Police Chief enclosed.
10a. Memo from Administrator enclosed.
b. Memo from Police Chief.
c. Information enclosed.
lla. Request enclosed.
b. Copy enclosed.
13a. Request enclosed.
b. Memo from Administrator enclosed.
c. Request enclosed.
d. Memo from Administrator enclosed.
Larr Thompson
City Administrator
LT/mh
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. Q--
NAME: Larry Thompson
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: March 25, 1985
MEETING DATE: April 1, 1985
CATEGORY: Unfinished Business
SUBJECT: Ambulance Service Agreement
EXPLANATION: Update on ambulance service.
REFERENCE MATERIALS/RESPONSIBILITY: Update - Stan Whittingham, Tarry Thompson
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Stan Whittingham Police
Dave Pietsch Fire
SIGNATU
•
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: AMBULANCE SERVICE - UPDATE
DATE: MARCH 29, 1985
The Administrators of Apple Valley, Lakeville and Farmington met with the
Burnsville City Council on March 19, 1985 to discuss the possibility of
integrating the four cities under one ambulance service. The concept was
well received but it was indicated that the three cities should have their
service in operation before integration.
Since then, the Fire Chief of Burnsville has indicated that if it is the
intention of the cities to integrate, Burnsville should operate the entire
system from the start (December 1, 1985) . Representatives from Apple Valley,
Lakeville, Burnsville and Farmington met this morning to discuss the matter
further. While the exact location of the unit has not been set, there was
a strong indication that it would probably be located at Apple Valley Fire
Station #1. Also, it was indicated that other departments would not be
able to use the stand-by unit for rescue services. Based on this information,
it was indicated that Farmington would be reluctant to enter into the
service without some reduction in subsidy fees. Estimates of cost under the
arrangement have not been established. This information will be forwarded
when received.
In order to expedite the process the City of Apple Valley has advertised
for bids on equipment certificates, and the City of Lakeville will approve
the plans and specifications and order the advertisement for bids on the
unit on Monday night. The bids will be rejected if a joint powers agreement
cannot be reached.
I have also met with representatives from Divine Redeemer to discuss the
present status of the service. Based on preliminary estimates, it appears
that the $3.32/capita rate will be reduced somewhat. Exact figures will be
given next week. Divine Redeemer also expressed a willingness to continue
providing ambulance service.
I am therefore seeking direction based on the aforementioned information.
The following questions should be answered.
1. Would the City be interested in being served by a unit
stationed in Apple Valley, with no additional equipment?
Would a reduced rate be acceptable?
2. If the unit is not moved south and no additional equipment is
provided, should staff begin looking into starting out own
service?
This item will be on the April 1, 1985 agenda for discussion.
Larry ompson
City Administrator
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. v
NAME: Stan Whittingham
DEPARTMENT: Police
DATE: March 26, 1985
MEETING DATE: April 1, 1985
CATEGORY: New Business
SUBJECT: Consider Computer Proposal by Teleterminal, Inc.
EXPLANATION: Self Explanatory
REFERENCE MATERIALS/RESPONSIBILITY: Request, Recommendation - Larry Thompson
Stan Whittingham, Wayne Henneke
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Stan Whittingham Police
Larry Thompson Administration
Wayne Henneke Finance
S GNATURE
1
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: COMPUTER SYSTEM - POLICE DEPARTMENT
' DATE: MARCH 29, 1985
I have reviewed the attached memo from Chief Whittingham regarding the
purchase of a computer system, and would like to qualify the stated con-
clusions. While I did feel that the proposal would be an excellent
opportunity, I understood that the software and hardware would cost $7,000.
Teleterminal, Inc. has since clarified that the $7,000 would only include
the software.
Since the acceptance of the proposal would be committing the City to a
sizable investment, I am not ready to make a favorable recommendation at
this time. I do feel that Chief Whittingham's memo would be a good basis
for Council discussion on the matter. Therefore, I feel that the Council
should discuss the merit of the police department acquiring an in-house
system, and direct staff accordingly.
Larry Thompson
City Administrator
LT/mh
cc: Stan Whittingham
Wayne Henneke
file
MEMO TO: Mayor and Council
SUBJECT: Computer System for Farmington Police Department
DATE : March 28, 1985
, THRU: Larry Thompson, City Administrator
BACKGROUND
Up to January, 1985 , computer systems were generally "mini"
framed computers . Departments in Dakota County such as Rosemount ,
Apple Valley, purchased these mini systems at a cost of between
$60, 000 and $80, 000.
In late 1983, early 1984 , Lakeville Police Department and Farmington
Police Department looked at the feasibility of purchasing a mini
system to be jointly used by both departments . Farmington Police
Department's cost for this system would have been in the neighborhood
of $28, 000 to $30, 000. After studying the feasibility of the system
it was felt by this writer, that the cost was prohibitive to justify
such a system, that would be beneficial to the police department.
Many police departments in the State have a terminal "keyboard and
screen" which allows the department to access the State computer for
police related information only. Items such as drivers license checks ,
vehicle registration checks , wants and warrants checks . Because
Farmington's population base is not at a 5, 000 population, we are not
eligible for the funding program to even provide a terminal for the
police department. Police departments can still lease a terminal to
access the State system, but it would cost the police department between
$450. and $500. a month lease fees . Again, the cost of leasing a
terminal for that kind of money was felt to be a bad return on an in-
vestment.
With the age of the "micro" computer (IBM PC) , and the cost associated
with such a system; would be a beneficial tool to departments the size
of Farmington. It should be noted that Farmington Police Department 's
size falls into an area of approximately 70% of the departments in the
State of Minnesota.
The State of Minnesota ' s Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension, Criminal Justice Information Division, is the overseer of
law enforcement computer systems accessing the State computer system
for information regarding law enforcement matters . Because of protocol
and a dedicated system to access law enforcement computers, the State
has said, that only certain computers can have that access . As late as
November, 1984, I was informed by the CJIS Division of the BCA, that
there was no immediate plans to allow micro computer systems on line
with the State system.
y.
Mayor and Council
March 28, 1985 Page 2
On January 23, 1985 ,. I received information that the CJIS Division
• of BCA, has approved vendors to develop software systems on micro
computers compatible with the State system.
CURRENT STATUS
Since February, 1985, I have been in touch with Tele-Terminals , Inc. ,
Minneapolis based computer Corporation, who are in the process of
developing software programs to be used on the micro computer systems .
The software is being developed for the IBM-PC, AT Computer. This
computer would be similar to the one the City of Farmington currently
owns.
Our police department has been asked by Tele-Terminals to be involved
in a pilot program to test and approve software programs on the IBM-PC
computer for induction into the State system.
Attached is some correspondence from Tele-Terminals regarding the cost
of the software and hardware system, to be used in the pilot program.
The cost of the entire system would be approximately $17, 604, ihbluding
maintenance for' onelyear after the acceptance of the software program.
As indicated in the letter from Tele-Terminals , the police department
would have to pay $2, 000. upon receipt of the equipment, $2, 000 after
the first working version of the software was approved and $3, 000 upon
acceptance of the system. The time table as of this writing would be
$2, 000 in July, for delivery of the system, $2, 000 sometime between
September and October for the second phase of the project and $3, 000
in December, 1985, or January 1986.
The cost of the hardware could be set up on a six month to twelve month -
lease buy program at which time the city would buy out the lease and
own the equipment. It should be noted that the hardware system involved
in this configuration is a more powerful unit than what the city cur-
rently owns .
I have discussed this matter with Tele-Terminals and told them our
situation on not having that kind of money budgeted for 1985. They
stated that they would help us out in any way they could knowing our
particular situation. The police department has some money budgeted
in 1985, which we could use to make the first $2, 000 payment t-or the
software system. Tele-Terminals would carry the balance of the $5, 000
until 1986. As to the hardware cost under a six or twelve month lease
buy agreement, we could lease the equipment for that period of time for
approximately $250. per month and at the end of the six or twelve month
period, buy the equipment. The cost of the system would mean a $3500
investment in 1985, and approximately $12, 000 investment in 1986.
Mayor and Council
March 28, 1985 Page 3
CONCLUSION
In discussing this matter with Larry Thompson, City Administrator
and Wayne Henneke , Finance Director , it is felt by the three of
us that it would be a excellent opportunity for the police depart-
ment to purchase a computer system.
The benefits to the city would include, backup system to the current
IBM-PC, as well as allow the police department to have the capabilities
of word processing, electronic filing and access into the State system.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this memo, please feel
free to contact me at any time.
Respectfully submitted ,
Stan V. Whittingham,
Chief of Police
SVW/mw
•
MEMO TO: STAN WHITTINGHAM
SUBJECT: 4 WHEEL DRIVE POLICY
DATE: APRIL 8, 1985
This memo serves as a follow up to the 4 wheel drive policy set
by the Council during the April 1, 1985 meeting. The policy set
by the Council is as follows:
Four Wheel Drive Unit
1) Primary Service - To be used as an emergency vehicle during
"bad" weather, I would assume that the definition would follow
the definitions stated in the heavy snowfall emergency policy.
If you require further clarification please contact me.
2) Secondary Service - The vehicle may be used on a periodic
basis for administrative, transport or non direct enforcement
related activities.
3) Mileage - Total vehicle mileage not to exceed 1,000 miles
during the next 12 months.
It should be noted that a concern of the Council was that safeguards
should be provided to prevent the vehicles from being pressed into
action.
If you have any qyestions regarding this matter, please contact me.
Lar hompson
City Administrator
LT/mh
cc: Mayor and Councilmembers
file
i !
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
•
ITEM NO. /10/6
NAME: Larry Thompson
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: March 25, 1985
MEETING DATE: April 1, 1985
CATEGORY: Miscellaneous
SUBJECT: 4 Wheel Drive Unit - Review
EXPLANATION: As per Council directive
REFERENCE MATERIALS/RESPONSIBILITY: Report - Stan Whittingham
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Stan Whittingham Police
Wayne Henneke Finance
SIGNATU
J.
MEMO TO: Mayor and Council
SUBJECT : Recap of First Six Months Operation of
4-Wheel Drive Unit for Police Department
DATE: March 28, 1985
THRU : Larry Thompson, City Administrator
Since acquiring the vehicle , October 2, 1984 , it has been used for
the following.
5e,Ler-
1 ) Used on-fft% different occasions during bad weather conditions
for a total of 2111 vehicle hours .
aadY
2) Used in investigation of cases . Most notably, was the tracking
of a stolen snowmobile track, cross country to a residence in
Lakeville, where the snowmobile was recovered and a person at
the residence was arrested for the theft .
3 ) Used by both full and part time officers to transport personnel
and equipment to the pistol range for winter time shooting.
4 ) Used to run radar surveys and check for stop sign violations .
5 ) Used as a stake-out vehicle at automobile dealers , where thefts
from vehicles were occurring.
6 ) Used by the officers to work hockey, basketball and school
function activities .
Since acquiring the vehicle, the department has spent a little over
$800 . on fuel, lubes , filters , maintenance and repairs on the vehicle.
Through some private donations and grant money we have been able to
equipment the vehicle with a two-way radio, lights and sirens , and
first aid equipment.
The cost of operation , maintenance and equipping of this vehicle during
the first six months of operation, would be about 'the same if the
police department had used the fire department ' s 4-wheel drive rig and
a fireman during the periods of the inclement weather. (See Item #1
above . )
Mayor and Council
March 28, 1985 Page 2
In summary, the police department has found this vehicle as a very
useful tool under the emergency conditions as well as some routine
situations .
If you have any questions or comments regarding this summary, please
feel free to contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
Stan V. Whittingham,
Chief of Police
SVW/mw