HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.06.83 Council Packet AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
JUNE 6, 1983
7:00 P.M.
1. Minutes of May 16, 1983 and May 31, 1983.
2. Tax Equalization meeting.
3. Open time - Discussion with members of the audience.
4. 7:15 P.M. Public hearing to consider Marigold Foods IDR Bonds.
a) Proposed resolution - Granting preliminary approval and
determining to proceed with project.
5. 7:30 P.M. Public Hearing - Terra Plat
6. Discussion - Manufactured Homes
7. Discussion - Surface Water Management
8. Small Cities Development Block Grant (SCDB)
a) Proposed resolution accepting the SCDB Grant award
b) Proposed Resolution adopting residential rehabilitation
policy and guidelines
c) Agreement with Dakota County HRA for administrative
services
9. Request - Liquor License Application - Eagles Club
10. Personnel matters
11. Request to have Transient Merchants License fee reduced - Scott Dobeshe
12. Discussion - Upgrading Ash Street
13. Consent agenda - a) Proposed resolution designating City Administrator as
authorized official to apply for Training Reimbursement
from POST Board
b) Tax abatements
c) Mountain Dew Day Licenses and permits
d) Capital Outlay request - Budget adjustment - Park and Rec
e) Bills
THE AGENDA IS CLOSED OUT AT NOON ON THE TUESDAY PRECEDING THE MEETING
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEMS
DATE : JUNE 1 , 1983
2. ( have contacted the Dakota County Assessors office and they are agreeable
to conducting a staff review of property values during the Council meeting
and to review their recommendation with the City Council later in the Council
meeting.
4. Information packet sent earlier. Ward Anderson, Vice President of Finance
for Marigold Foods will be present to answer any questions you may have re-
garding Bond sale.
5. Memo from Charles Tooker enclosed. The developers have requested that
the City Council consider approval of a privately funded developers agree-
ment during the hearing. I have enclosed a copy of an agreement previously
used by the City for your review.
6. The Planning Commission recommended that the Zoning Ordinance not permit
manufactured homes in any district except R-4. The Planning Commission fur-
ther recommended that the Zoning Ordinance be amended to define rural manu-
factured homes (memo from Charles Tooker enclosed and Planning Minutes from
May 17, 1983, sent earlier. )
7. Memo enclosed. As stated in the surface water management memo, I feel
that this item should be addressed during the Terra Plat public hearing.
8. Memos and resolutions enclosed.
9. Stan is currently reviewing the license application.
10. Memo sent earlier. I am requesting that the City Council approve staff
recommendation regarding Roger Micheals. Because of the delicate nature of
this matter it would be appreciated if comments and discussion would be
limited. If anyone has any concerns regarding this matter please contact me
before the meeting.
11 . Scott Dobesh is planning to sell ice cream from a wagon this summer and
would like to see the license fee reduced. He will be at the meeting to dis-
cuss the matter. The current fee is $100/year.
12. Memo enclosed.
13. a) Memo enclosed
b) Application enclosed
c) Memo enclosed
d) Request enclosed
e) Copy enclosed
r.�
Larr ompson
Cit dministrator
LT/mh
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: UPGRADING ASH ST.
DATE : JUNE 1 , 1983
As was mentioned during the Council meeting of May 31 , 1983, City representatives
recently met with the County Board to discuss the turnback of County roads #64
and #74. Much of the discussion was directed toward the heavy use of #74 (Ash St)
and the repercussions of turning the road back. Because of the attention now
being directed towards #74 by the County Board, the investigation of surface
water management now being conducted by staff, and the problems the City has
encountered with surface water runoff this spring, I feel the timing is right
to once again look into the possibility of upgrading Ash St. from a rural
section to an urban section, and to resolve the drainage problems in the sou-
thern part of the City.
Reviewing City records, the following information was compiled:
1 . The County would possibly pay for all costs associated with upgrading
the road except surface water drainage.
2. The State Highway Dept. will pay for some of the drainage costs if
the project is designed to eliminate surface water problems on a
permanent basis.
3. Two Drainage reports were submitted to the Council (November, 1966 and
February, 1976) but both were rejected because of cost.
4. Very little, if any, outside financing would be available to the City
for such a project.
I would like to point out that I have only completed a superficial rewiew of
this matter, and am submitting it for general discussion. If it is decided
that the Council is interested in pursuing the matter further, I will compile
a full report.
a ry �►• psora
City ;r inistrato
LT/mh
cc: Bob Rosene
File