Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03.20.95 Council Packet AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR MARCH 20, 1995 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVE AGENDA 4. CITIZENS COMMENTS (5 minute limit per person for items not on agenda) 5. CONSENT AGENDA (All items approved in 1 motion unless anyone wishes an item removed for discussion) a. Approve Minutes - 3/6 (Regular) b. Adopt Resolution Establishing a Fee for Licensing Cigarette and Tobacco Sales c. Approve Contractual Agreement with MN Dept. of Administration for Building Inspection Services in State Licensed Facilities d. Approve School/Conference Request - Annual Police Chiefs Training Conference e. Adopt Resolution Amending Solid Waste Policy/Fees - Extra Bag Charge f. Adopt Ordinance Prohibiting Motorized Vehicles on Lakes and Ponds g. Approve Naming of Park in Nelsen Hills Farm Addition h. Approve Recommendation for Traffic Control at 3rd and Oak Street i. Approve Capital Outlay Request - Carbon Monoxide Meter - Fire Dept. j . Approve School/Conference Request - Sectional Fire School k. Receive Annual Sewer Report 1. Adopt Resolution Approving Agreement with FEMA for Additional Funding m. Proclaim April 23-29 as National Volunteer Week n. Approve Request to Hire Full Time Police Secretary/Finance Clerk o. Consider 1995 CDBG Application Modification Request p. Approve Right of Entry Agreement for St. Michael' s Church Cemetery q. Consider Annexation Request - Dufferin Property in Empire Township r. Approve Payment of the Bills 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS/AWARD OF CONTRACTS 7. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Consider Northern Natural Gas Company Request for Pole Building b. Consider Request for Change in Farmington New Home Program 8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. COPS FAST Grant b. Discuss Corps of Engineer Response to Flood Study Request c. Discuss Results of Dakota County Traffic Study on CSAH 31 between 180th and 187th Street d. East Farmington (1) Purchase of Hed Property PULL 4.24--- -.Rascl i --AcsepGi-ng---eae l l-i-t -R-epe* IL4 3 -P;ate a Spc.e i i-eat3-eta-s-f er-Bi get-Mecrt- ry -cea f Sgru.c -Street Access e. Solid Waste (1) Receive Solid Waste Scenarios (2) Adopt Resolution Approving Rate Increase (3) Authorize Solid Waste Equipment Purchase (4) Approve Agreement with Knutson for Solid Waste Disposal and Transfer 10. NEW BUSINESS a. Adopt Resolution Establishing Permits and Fees - Fire Activities b. Street Lighting - City Wide Design and Plan 11. MISCELLANEOUS 12. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, COUNCILMEMBERS 13 . UPCOMING MEETINGS 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION 15. ADJOURN AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 5c Name: Karen Finstuen Department: Administration r '. G Date: March 8 , 1995 Meeting Date: March 20 , 1995 Category: Consent Subject: Approve Contractual Agreement Between MN Dept. of Administration and the City for Building Inspection Services in State Licensed Facilities Explanation: Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo/Agreement - Karen Finstuen Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson Administration John Manke Building Inspections Signature MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: CONTRACT AGREEMENT WITH STATE FOR INSPECTION SERVICES DATE: MARCH 13, 1995 The attached agreement for building inspection services for State licensed facilities is similar to an agreement which was approved approximately one year ago for public buildings such as schools. It simply means that each State licensed facility that is granted a building permit in Farmington will be looked at on a project by project basis. Karen Finstuen Administrative Assistant cc: John Manke • MEMO TO: KAREN DATE: MARCH 10, 1995 SUBJECT: STATE LICENSED FACILITIES' CONTRACT State Licensed Facilities means a building that is licensed by the state as a hospital, nursing home, supervised living facility, free standing outpatient surgical center or correctional facility. Without a signed contract the State will do the plan review, inspections and collect of all fees if a State Licensed Facility is built in Farmington. I suggest the project by project contract,because at that time the work load can be reviewed. The contract signed about a year ago was for Public Buildings such as schools and buildings with State money involved. John W Manke Building Official 1 This is the contract to sign if you wish to choose to do . , . plan review and inspections or just inspections on a project by project basis for 'State Licensed Facilities' in your jurisdiction through June 30, 1996. f CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN 3 and STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS DIVISION Recitals WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Commissioner of Administration, by and through the Department of Administration, Building Codes and Standards Division, (hereinafter "State") is authorized pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.61, subd. la to contract with a municipality for plan review, code administration, and code enforcement service, as stated in subdivision la for State Licensed Facilities in the contractual jurisdiction, WHEREAS, (hereinafter "Municipality"), as defined in Minn. Stat. § 16B.60, subd. 3, constitutes an entity with which the state has the authority to contract for plan review, code administration, and code enforcement service for State Licensed Facilities in the contractual jurisdiction, WHEREAS, the Municipality wishes to provide these services on a project specific basis at its option, WHEREAS, the Municipality's building official meets the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 16B.65, WHEREAS, the State has determined that the Municipality has enough adequately trained and qualified building inspectors to provide those services for State Licensed Facility projects defined in Minn. Stat. § 16B.60, subd. 11: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the State and the Municipality enter into this Contract for the purpose of conferring upon the Municipality responsibility for administration of the State Building Code, Minn. Stat. § 16B.59 through 16B.75 and Minn. Rules Chapters 1300 through 1370 (hereinafter "Code") for specific projects regarding State Licensed Facilities within the Municipality's jurisdiction, as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Specific Projects. Municipality shall designate, at its option, any projects for which it chooses to provide services by indicating that choice on the project form provided to the Municipality by the State, an example of which form is attached as Exhibit A, and by returning the form within.15 days to: b. To attend to all aspects of code administration and code enforcement for inspections only, including: 1. Issuance of all permits 2. Maintenance of all records (inspection records, special inspection reports, tests); , • 3. Issuance of certificate of occupancy with a copy informing the State Building Official when services are completed: 4. Completion of the Building Codes and Standards Division state licensed facility project report form, which form is to be provided by the State. • 4. Term of Contract. This Contract shall be effective upon execution by the State Building Official and in effect through June 30, 1996, unless cancelled by either party under paragraph 5, "Cancellation." 5. Cancellation. This Contract may be cancelled by the State or Municipality at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. 6. Liability. Municipality assumes all liability for its actions and actions of its employees and agents performing under this Contract and is governed by the provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. State. Ch. 466. 7. Assignment. Municipality shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Contract. 8. $tate Audits. The books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Municipality relevant to this Contract shall be subject to examination by the contracting department and the legislative auditor. _ 9. Fees and Surcharges. All costs of administering the building code under this Contract shall be charged by the Municipality as prescribed by Minn. Stat. § 16B.61, subd. la. No fees, charges or surcharges shall be paid by the Building Codes and Standards Division of the Department of Administration, State of Minnesota, under the provisions of this contract. 10. Ownership of Documents. Any reports, studies, photographs, negatives or other documents prepared by the Municipality in the performance of its obligations under this Contract shall be the exclusive property of the State and all such materials shall be remitted to the State upon request. Municipality shall not use, willingly allow or cause to have such materials used for any purpose other than performance of State's obligations under this Contract without the prior written consent of the State. • a STATE OF MINNESOTA ., Department of Exhibit A Administration 4`,�nnn�t un,,,,,�� OPTION NOTICE `AST N.47tLC OV °+ lei. A a:)••ts. SPECIFIC PROJECT FORM E ..ti PLAN REVIEW AND/OR INSPECTIONS OPTION ç -2 •rs: :. 185s...:... [ DATE: D ' [ [ Our mission: r To improve the quality L and productivity of Minnesota PROJECT: DS 1 government. LOCATION: DS2 COUNTY: CNTY *************************************** * State Assigned Project Number: C * *************************************** The State of Minnesota, Department of Administration,Building Codes and Standards Division (hereinafter"BCSD")and MCDNAME (hereinafter"Municipality")have executed a Contract dated CD (hereinafter "Contract")conferring upon Municipality responsibility for administration of the State Building Code, Minnesota Statute SS16B.59 to 16B.75 and Minnesota Rules Chapters 1300- 1370(hereinafter "Code")for state licensed facilities within the Municipality's jurisdiction. The Contract provides that Municipality may, at it's option, choose the projects for which it wishes to provide services by indicating that choice on this project form and by returning this form within 15 days to: Building Codes and Standards Division 408 Metro Square 7th and Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101 By initialing (a) or (b) below, Municipality exercises it's option under Paragraph 2 of the Contract to administer the Code. (a) For this project, Municipality agrees to do Plan Review and Inspections as defined in the Contract, Paragraph 3, Subdivision a. (b) For this project, Municipality agrees to do inspections only, as defined in the Contract, Paragraph 3, Subdivision b. This project form constitutes notice to the State that the Municipality hereby exercises its option. APPROVED APPROVED Authorized Municipal Official Date State Building Official Date Building Codes and Standards Division,Facilities Management Bureau,408 Metro Square Building, Seventh and Robert Streets,St.Paul,MN 55101; Voice: 612 296-4639;Fax: 612 297-1973 TTY/TDD: Twin Cities 612 297-5353 or Greater Minnesota 800 657-3529 and ask for voice number AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 5e Name: Tom Kaldunski V► `� 07 Public Works V Y Department: Date: March 9 . 1995 Meeting Date: March 20, 1999 Category: Consent Subject: Adopt Resolution Amending R1-95 by Amending Policy C - Extra Bag Charges Explanation: Proposed in order to promote better public relations. Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo - Tom Kaldunski Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Tom Kaldunski Public Works Ben Klotz Public Works Lena Larson/Pat Rothe Public Works Arvilla Neff Finance Signature MEMO TO: COUNCIL AND MAYOR SUBJECT: EXTRA BAG CHARGES DATE: MARCH 20, 1995 Currently the City charges $2.00 per bag per occurrence in 30-60-90 gallon containers whenever lids are not closed on the containers. Multiple bags result in more charges. I have completed a review of this practice. The policy was implemented to encourage the customer to ask for the proper size container and to discourage the practice of "snow coning" the containers. I have reviewed the data from a recent quarter. The results are as follows; Total number of customers billed extra 236 (10%) Estimated total number of city customers 2360 (100%) Revenue billed $958.00 In reviewing the data, it becomes apparent that most of these 236 customers place one or two bags extra per quarter. This is not a significant impact on the City's Solid Waste Operations. When three or more extra bags are placed on a container, it causes problems. Sixteen customers would have met this criteria in the study. I believe that it has not been cost-effective for the City the administer this program. It takes Staff time for the operator to keep the original records and to post the billing. In addition, the City's customers have expressed their feelings about these extra charges for one and two bags. It is my recommendation that the City keep the policy intact for incidents in which three (3) or more bags are "snow coned" on top of the container. The fee should be set at $3.00 per bag ($9.00 minimum). This will still have the desired effect on "snow coning" while improving customer relations with the 8% to 9% of the City's customers that occasionally have an extra bag on top of their container. It is recommended that the City Council adopt this change in Policy to improve customer relations. The Staff will adjust the enforcement after the Council adopts these changes. Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke Arvilla Neff Rosemary Swedin Karen Finstuen Benno Klotz Lena Larson Pat Rothe Solid Waste Crew TJK RESOLUTION NO. tc11795 AMEND RESOLUTION R1-95 POLICY C - EXTRA BAG CHARGES Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 20th day of March, 1995 at 7:00 P.M. (! f /� _(� The following member were present: K ) The following member were absent: 71,614.-Q-- Member l 14.-Q--Member AGMA-A. introduced and Member vl C seconded the following: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Farmington has by authority the right to establish solid waste fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that revised service fees should be established for extra bags. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Farmington that the following fees be adopted for extra bag charge: EXTRA BAG CHARGE(lids that do not 1-2 bags--no charge closeor additional garbage deposited by 3+ bags --$3.00 per bag/$9.00 minimum customers at the time of collection.) The resolution adopted by recordedVote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 20th day of March, 1995. Mayor Attested to the day of , 1995. Clerk/Administrator SEAL AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 5 f Name: James Bell Department: Parks and Recreation Date: March 9 , 1995 Meeting Date: March 20, 1995 Category: Consent Subject: Adopt Proposed Ordinance Prohibiting Motorized Vehicles on Lakes and Ponds Explanation: Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo/PARAC Minutes - Jim Bell Referred To: (Name) Department Development Committee C7 Signature • 0/4*-- 6)76 i-v-47'—j r‘lb 1;} /1"6 .:17gC) Memo to: Mayor and Council Subject: Ordinance prohibiting motor powered vehicles on lakes or ponds Date: March 9, 1995 The Parks and Recreation Commission at its meeting last evening recommends that the council pass an ordinance that prohibits motor powered vehicles on lakes or ponds. The purpose of this ordinance is to stop the complaints from neighbors surrounding our newly established lake in the Prairie Creek Addition and any other lakes or ponds that we may construct in the future. The ordinance would read under park regulations as follows: Section IX. Motor Vehicles Subd.VNo person shall operate any type of motor powered vehicles upon - ,lake or pond within the City of Farmington. (ie: boats,jet skis, seusaselpilese) Please consider this addition to the park regulations. j, James Bell Parks and Recreation Director MINUTES PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MARCH 8, 1995 1. The meeting was called to order by Chair Johnson at 7:30 P.M. . Members Present: Johnson, Gerten, Richardson, Schlawin, Smithson. Members Absent: None. Also Present: Programmer Pellicci, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Bjerke, Parkkeeper VanBlarcom. (Director Bell arrived later in the meeting.) 2. MOTION by Richardson, second by Gerten to approve the agenda with the following additions: a. Pool Restoration Update, b. Request by Darrell Moench, c. Discuss Ordinance Prohibiting Motorized Vehicles on Lakes/Ponds. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. MOTION by Schlawin, second by Gerten to approve the minutes of February 8, 1995 as prepared. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 4. The Parks and Recreation Staff was welcomed by the Commission Members. 5. The Members next discussed the naming of the park in Nelsen Hills Farm plat. MOTION by Gerten, second by Johnson to name the park "Daisy Knolls Park" . VOTING FOR: Richardson, Johnson, Gerten. VOTING AGAINST: Schlawin, Smithson. MOTION CARRIED. Staff was instructed to send a thank you note to Jill Ronning for submitting the selected park name. 6. The restoration of the municipal swimming pool was discussed. No action was taken at this time. 7. The members discussed a proposed ordinance which would prohibit motor powered vehicles on Lake Julia. MOTION by Schlawin, second by Johnson to forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve such an ordinance. APIF, MOTION (.. CARRIED. 8. Darrell Moench has requested permission to have kiddie rides at Rambling River Park. The Commission members discussed Mr. Moench's request and it was the consensus that he be invited to a PARAC meeting to review the request. It was also the consensus that this meeting take place after the Commission has toured the City parks. 9. MOTION by Smithson, second by Gerten to adjourn at 8:30 P.M. . APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 10. The PARAC would like to invite the HPC to the the next regular meeting. Director Bell was requested to contact the HPC and forward the invitation. Submitted by, y % 1 I Pal2iin Joy Pellicci Recreation Programmer p AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 5k Name: Tom Kaldunski / I Department: Public Works Date: March 10, ._ 1995 Meeting Date: March 20, 1995 Category: Consent Subject: Receive Annual Sewer Use Report Explanation: Reference Material/Responsibilty Report - Tom Kaldunski Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Tom Kaldunski Public Works Jerry Bauer Public Works /;1411/471 Signature MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: 1994 SANITARY SEWER USE DATE: MARCH 20, 1995 I have completed my review of the City's 1994 Sanitary Sewer Use. Attachment#1 is a copy of the City's annual "Survey of Sewer Use Data for 1994," which has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services (MCWS, formerly MWCC). The City added 5.25 miles to the sanitary sewer system in 1994, bringing the total miles of sanitary sewer to 35.78 miles (a 17% growth). It is estimated that the City provides sanitary sewer service to 7,041 citizens as of January 1, 1995. Attachment #2 shows the growth in sanitary sewers since 1986. Attachment #3 shows the annual sewer flow since 1971. The City's MCWS metered sewer flow for 1994 was 439,000,000 gallons, which compares to 528,900,000 in 1993. The 1994 average daily sewer flow was 1,200,000 GPD, which compares to an average 1994 water use of 667,435 GPD (55.4% of sewer flow). This indicates that the City experienced an estimated 535,000 GPD (44.6% of sewer flow) of inflow/infiltration in 1994. Attachment#4 is a graph which shows the monthly flow for the City as recorded by the MCWS. Rainfall in 1994 totaled 32.84 inches. A 5 inch rain was recorded in May 1994 and 11+ inches fell in late September/early October 1994. You can notice that the sewer meters peaked following these events. While a lot of I/I was received in 1994, it should be noted that it was not as significant as it was in 1992/1993. The total I/I was reduced, due to the success of the City's Sump Pump Inspection Program, by an estimated 100,000,000 gallons in 1994 (a reduction of approximately 300,000 GPD). Attachment #5 is a graph that compares 1993 flows with 1994 flows. The MCWS and MPCA have noted the City's success. 1994 was the first time in ten or more years that the City did not have to bypass sewage following significant rainfalls. This attests to the success of the Sump Pump Program. The City will complete its Sump Pump Inspection Program in 1995 with Phase III, which began on March 13, 1995. It has been estimated that the City avoided I/I costs of up to $120,000 in 1994. While it did take an investment of$60,375 to do Phases I and II of the Sump Pump Inspection Program, the City has already received benefits in excess of its initial cost. In addition, if 1995-2005 has wet periods similar to 1983-1993, the City has a potential to avoid $1,000,000 in costs related to I/I. The City will receive credits for 1994 I/I reduction from the MCWS in the 1996 billing cycle. 1 Another significant sewer project that was undertaken in 1994 was the Pine Knoll Improvement Project which will eventually provide sanitary sewer service to an estimated 100 homes that had previously utilized on-site disposal systems, and will help reduce the potential pollution of ground water due to failing systems. Currently the City has 155 on-site septic systems. The Pine Knoll Project will help reduce this to an estimated 75 systems located in the rural areas of Farmington. In addition, the City has done extensive sewer flow monitoring to determine where I/I problems occur. An analysis was done in Apri1,1994 which showed that a significant amount of I/I that passed through the MCWS sewer meters did not originate from the City's sewer meter. The City has been very responsible for its I/I. We have been able to pay WWTP costs to the MCWS over the years. In addition, it has, and will continue to, aggressively seek to reduce its I/I. It is necessary for the City to express its concern over I/I for non-Farmington sources. The MCWS has expressed interest in reviewing this I/I, however, they requested more detailed information. Attachment #6 is a comparison between the MCWS data from January 1991 through December 1994 and the City's sewer meter data. The City meters its sewer flows at all connections to the interceptors. This monthly comparison clearly demonstrates the City's position since 1993. From January 1991 through February 1992 (a relatively dry period), the sewage flow data compares very favorably. The City has been experiencing heavy rainfalls, flooding and high ground water levels since Spring 1992. The graph indicates that during the wettest time periods there is a significant amount of I/I from non-Farmington sources which has been estimated to be the following: 1992 Measured Non-Farmington I/I 30,000,000 gallons 1993 Measured Non-Farmington I/I 128,000,000 gallons 1994 Measured Non-Farmington I/I 100.000.000 gallons Total 258,000,000 gallons At the current treatment cost of$1,276.95 per million gallons, this excessive I/I from non-Farmington sources has cost the City an estimated $329,453.10 from 1992 to 1994. Farmington should take a position with MCWS that the City should not be responsible for I/I that enters the interceptor from sources outside the City's jurisdiction and that the City should receive a refund. A similar position was discussed in 1993 with MCWS, however, no credit was issued. The Council should direct Staff to present this information to the MCWS and seek a credit. This credit could be very significant if the City was able to convince the MCWS to consider the effects of non-Farmington I/I going back to 1971, as was considered in 1993. However, we do not have sewer flow data prior to January 1991. The information completed in 1993 was based on engineering judgments and estimates. 2 The City did convince the MCWS to begin monitoring sewer flows from Empire Township, with particular concern for the lift station that serves the Edmar Addition on 205th Street. The lift station was modified in 1993 to include a pump timer and the Township has been recording data since then. A pump calibration was done which allows the conversion of the timer data to sewer flow data. The City has received Historic Empire Township flow data from the MCWS (attachment#7). Attachment #8 is a graph that has been prepared based upon this historic data. It should be noted that flows from 1975 to 1992 are based upon a formula which takes into consideration the number of connections and a typical flow rate. 1993 and 1994 data includes actual metering data at the Edmar lift station, which produced higher flows and variations in quantity which correspond to precipitation. The graph shows the historic data of sewage that flows through Farmington's meter at T.H.3. The data for the Edmar lift station is interesting when you compare 1981 to 1994. Note that the sewer flow allocation remained constant from 1981 to 1992 because no homes were added. The 1993 and 1994 data increased drastically (80% and 40%, respectively) due to actual flow metering. The Township has reduced its sewer rate 48% to $37.00 per quarter. On this graph I have estimated what the actual flows from this lift station might have been if metering had been conducted from 1981 to 1993. It is assumed that the pattern would be similar to the City's, due to proximity and geography. This analysis has led me to the conclusion that the flows in Empire Township - Edmar lift station will fluctuate with precipitation due to I/I and that the metering that Empire Township does (per MCWS direction) will provide adequate protection for the City of Farmington. With this metering in place the City will not have to be concerned with potential impact for any I/I that might occur in the Empire Township lift station. The Township I/I impact on the City is estimated at $10,900 between 1983 and 1992. This is not as significant as the MCWS interceptor I/I. The Township has conducted its own Sump Pump Removal Program. This will help them deal with potential I/I. Attachment #9 is a map of the Edmar addition which indicates properties with known sump discharges. It is possible that these homes may have had a significant I/I impact on Edmar Addition. Attachment #10 shows pictures of some of the sump discharges that show 4 - 6" discharge pipes with heavy flows. The Township must continue to enforce its Sump Ordinance in a manner similar to Farmington in order to keep I/I under control. Farmington has proved through its studies that as few as six properties can discharge 500+ GPM, which is sufficient to overload a lift station such as Hendersen and Edmar lift stations. The City will continue to monitor these sump pump discharge locations into the future to protect its interests. The final conclusion of this report indicates that the City of Farmington is being held financially responsible for significant I/I sources on the MCWS interceptor system. The Council should direct Staff to begin working with MCWS to reduce the City's 3 responsibilities and seek a credit. The impact from the MCWS interceptor I/I is much more significant ($300,000) when compared to the estimated impact from the Township ($10,000). MCWS may consider this to be allowable I/I, but I believe that the City of Farmington should not be held responsible for I/I on the MCWS interceptor. P14,X-Aelni Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer TJK/pr cc: file Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke Jay Kennedy Jerry Bauer Don Blume, MCWS TJK 4 List of Attachments 1. 1994 Survey of Sewer Use Data 2. Growth of Farmington Sewer System 3. City of Farmington Annual Sewer Flows - 1971 to 1994 4. MCWS "Monthly Flows in Farmington" - 1991 to 1994 5. Comparison of 1993 to 1994 Sewer Data 6. Comparison of MCWS Metering and City of Farmington Metering 7. Historic Empire Township Flow - MCSW Data 8. Graph of Empire Township - Edmar Lift Station Data 9. Map of Sump Pump Discharges - Edmar Addition 10. Pictures of Sump Pump Discharges - Edmar Addition 5 Attachment 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES Mears Park Centre, 230 E. 5th Street • Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101 SURVEY OF SEWER USE DATA FOR 1994 GE INFORMATION A. Municipality City of Farmington • B. 1994 Estimated Population 7.575 - C. 1994 Estimated Sewered Population 7,041 D. Total Length of Sewer System 35.78 miles (Furnish Updated Sewer Map) IL SANITARY SEWER USE INFORMATION BASED ON CONNECTIONS AND DWELLING UNITS - • 1993 * 1994 CONNECTIONS AS DWELLING REC * -CONNECTIONS DWELLING REC * OF 12/31/92 UNITS . (estimated) UNITS ON 12/31/93 A. Residential 1. Single Family 1,769 1,769 2,074 2,074 Dwellings 2. Multiple Family Dwellings 389 390 392 424 3. Mobile Homes 4 4 4 4 B. Institutional 14 — 48 — C. Commercial 165 — 123 — D. Industrial 12 — 1 — TOTAL: 2,353 2,163 2,642 2,502 *Residential Equivalent Connections * The 1994 data has been revised from 1993. We have recently installed water meters, and this has made it easier to track our customers. Survey of Sewer Use Data for 1994 Page Two Municipality Farmington E. Estimated 1994 sewage flow by class of user 1. Residential 320,854,460 2. Institutional 38,892,049 3. Commercial 32,849,291 4. Industrial 46,404,200 (see attached report from Marigold Foods) * Sewer use is-based on the percentage of water sold for each category. TOTAL 439,000,000 gallons F. Estimated 1995 Sewer Connections • CONNECTIONS FOR COMMISSION USE _. 1. Residential* 340 2. Institutional 1 3. Commercial _._ 6 4: ._Industrial._ -� _�_._. ._• - _. TOTAL 347 * Please indicate number of dwelling units 340 III. MUNICIPAL AND PRIVATE WATER USE INFORMATION A. Number of connections to municipal water supply CONNECTIONS CONNECTIONS * AS OF (estimated) ON 12/31/93 12/31/94 1. Residential* . 1.887 2,156 2. Institutional 11 48 3. Commercial 164 121 4. Industrial 4 0 TOTAL 2,066 2,325 * Please indicate number of dwelling units 1,774 * Revised per Met Council criteria. Survey of -Sewer Use Data for 1994 • Page Three Municipality Farmington B. Municipal Water Sold in 1994 FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH OUARTER OUARTER OUARTER QUARTER TOTAL 1. Residential 41.979 49.464 41.511 45.400 178.354 2. Institutional 4.669 6.711 5.856 4.383 21 .619 3. Commercial 3.752 4.435 3.728 6_345 1R_760 4. Industrial TOTAL FOR YEAR 50.400 60.610 51.095 56. 128 218.233 5. Unit of Measurement million gallons * NOTE: 1st and 3rd Quarter water sold C. Total Municipal Water Pumped in 1994 data are incomplete. The amount of water First Quarter 50,400,000 pumped will be used in its place. Second Quarter 66,895,000 Third Quarter 70.191.000 Fourth Quarter 56,128.000 TOTAL 243,_614,.000. gallons D. Provide number of sewer connections that are furnished with flow from private water supplies and estimated flow for 1994. CONNECTIONS VOLUME (mg) 1. Residential 0 0 2. Institutional 0 0 3. Commercial 0 0 4. Industrial 1 69.408 (see attached report from Marigold Foods) • Survey of Sewer Use Data for 1994 Page Four Municipality Farmington IV. %limn 4; _ ID 4 0 S-td • JO- O S z ; 4 OW OW_ 41. _ O ANOTHER COMMUNITY A. Community , -to Apple Valley interceptor (s.s.d. #1) Type 12/31/93 12/31/94 Residential 917 -._ 1,177-* *133 of these were Commercial 7 7 connections that Industrial 0 0 did not produce an- sewage. Community from Empire Twp. to Farmington (approx. , + mg, Met Council to adjust once actual data obtained) 12/31/93 . 12/31/94 Residential _ .54 _ 54 Commercial - 0 0 Industrial .0 0 - Additional Communities from Castle Rock Township (Dakota County Fairgrounds) Flow is included in metered flow: 1- Residential 12 Commercial (200,070 gallons).. V. DATA ON ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM A.---Does your 'community :permit the installation-of these facilities? B. If these _systems are permitted, please complete the attached "On-Site Disposal System Survey". Survey Completed Bv: Tom Kaldunski - Name - Director of Public Works/City Engineer Title (612) 463-7111 •. Phone Number Please Return the Completed Survey To: Mr. Don Bluhm, Municipal Services Manager Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services Mears Park Centre • 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 229-2116 SURV.SEW METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES MEARS PARK CENTRE, 230' EAST FIFTH STREET • SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 1994 Survey of On-Site Disposal Systems • I. General Information A. Municipality: City of Farmington B. 1994 Estimated Population: 7,575 C. 1994 Estimated Population Utilizing On-Site Disposal Systems: 534 - II. Inventory of On-Site Disposal Systems A. Number of Systems as of December 31, 1993: 176 B. Number of Systems as of December 31, 1994: 155 (see attached map)* C. Any Systems within the Municipalities Serving Institutions, Commercial Establishments and/or Industries: 0 If so, please list Name, Location, Size and type of On- Site System: • III. On-Site System Problems A. Number of Systems Inspected During 1994: 2 1. New Systems: 2 2. Existing Systems: 0 B. Number of Systems with known problems*: unknown 1. Most Common Problem: 2. Other Problems: C. Number of Systems Replaced/Rehabilitated in 1994: 6 IV. Septaae Disposal A. Number of Systems Pumped in 1994: unknown B. Total Amount (gallons) of Septage Pumped: unknown * Attached Map Showing Locations Note: The City completed a sanitary sewer project in Pine Knoll Subdivision which resulted in abandonment of 26 septic tanks. More will follow in 1995. • C. Location of Septage Disposal Site(s) *: unknown D. List the Installers and Pumpers who serve the ' Municipality: Name Address Phone 1. _ 2. ,. 3. see attached list V. Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Program Does your Municipality have an O&M Program for its On-Site System Owners?: 4 = - no - City has been `working on a new ordinance with this in mind. If so briefly describe: Survey Completed By. .__._ Tom Kaldunski V - Name Director of Public Works/City Engineer Title . _ __ . . .. (612) 463-7111 "'- Phone Number _._ _ * Attach Map Showing Locations Please Return the Completed Survey to: Mr. Don Bluhm, Municipal Services Manager Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 229-2116 ONSITE S Marigold Foods, Inc. �—' r 15 4th Street 'LT.:: __ I Farmington, MN 55024-1099 Bus: (612) 463-7093 Fax: (612) 463-3504 KEM1'S "It's the cows." January 10, 1995 Jay Kennedy City of Farmington 325 Oak St. Farmington, MN 55024 RE: Marigold Foods, Inc. , Monthly Sewage. & Water Quantities Dear Jay, Here is a copy of Marigold Foods, Inc. sewage and water quantities for 1994 . If you need any further information or assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Gene Cowles Production Supervisor Marigold Foods, Inc. JAY KENNEDY CITY OF FARMINGTON 325 OAK ST. FARMINGTON, MN 55024 WATER (GALS) SEWER (GALS) JAN 4,590,000 1,593,000 FEB 4,770,000 3,251,700 MAR 4,860,000 4,190,200 APR 4,500,000 3,387,700 MAY 5,850,000 4,190,900 JUNE 6,096,000 3,863,400 JULY 5,580,000 4,169,200 AUG 7,110,000 4,781,600 SEPT 6,870,000 4,729,700 53 OCT 6,270,000 4,826,000 NOV 6,894,000 3,928,000 DEC 6,018,000 3,492,800 TOTALS 69,408,000 46,404,200 . • 1------�--- ----� ilil�i' �i j ---� ONSITE DISPOSAL FACILITY - �" i ;?�uu;1B' iii": �,!�: 110-4:`, D�+�•=1 1,1 115-------- 114-•—cr-E 4r ---, 1Li..,••••:!:. •th9u • c,itir TY -----22---- i ;�. 1 Floe Kr►ot.I. u.BDnn5wll r i 011 I 4 II.inr11:0!0:3 ----r 4 .,. ■ ---4- 2i6--- 2: ' ft jP..'L► !�' • —.—..±..-- — ,i , reg •IV 111111011111; I_____.+._________3,5_, --- � ,iia@www --a2--- —I • `;��: i In dill• I 1 . • I bok!i lairligi 411 , 1.• ® ' .'Cliff 0.- ' -114 PINE KN°u sv.taayis 4 t R t�LY I &1?wER tkrreg HHNN4 i[:1'4 Itphi. u • *RA Avqu. cne. AS of Pbthy, NJ"' 4 iteldoroas wen 0006urgD- • . N -Div romp* fjy{,DNK7ia 13 QA'y'w444u 4'o 8 (,owlNeL7fp Bf. Iz/i/qL., 3--- - -- --- -- 1 0 3000 6000 Scale in feet 8oneetroo EXISTING ON—SITE WASTEWATER DISPOSAL FACILITIES NON Roene Anderllk Q FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA . FIGURE 10 �Aeeoclaleo COMPREHENSIVE SEWER POLICY PLAN - 141 virtn4!VG AUG. 1993 COMM, 14159 N 00 z tri M .1- U M t/, O M 01 01 .-r OE--. z Op� CA fW CA -' CA 4 p t~ • °z o q [-I - 0 .-i W W _ — w W * 0-1 C 00 W _ ON W "Zr Cf) . N. g00 4 00 00 cf) — CT 1-1* 111 01 04 � P•1 W CA F CA Q A I I f I + F 04 33 o kr) o v, o In o tel o '1- M M N N .-+ .--I q pfn Sa'III4i • l'irwfx„,.,„! I I I • ( YEARLY SEWAGE FLOWS • - FARMINGTON, MN 600-. - - ^ 528.9 i Z 498.6 i 464 449 3446.5 % 443.90 . / / 400-, 402 395 % _awl /: pc N•4vc TyPiC`�y 307.9„dodi, ,liolopi 300 "Ct • a 0A- z /fes 275 . 1� / C Q 232 220 s I ISE LOW 215 / 1111p11111.111P"-, jiiiiii/ I125127 J I 111 7 % C ...... II „ lB 1: 293i.8 4 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 185 86 187 88 89 90 91 92 93 9+ YEAR %1 SEWAGE FLOW Ill ANNUAL RAINFALL ATTACHMENT #3 N CO d' 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) r r r it Z i + X W . V a F- a , 0 . . N r M N • , . , M r- CO d' , , 0 N tt CO CO • I ii?C : , > 0) I`• 0 ; •• CO : : : z N � COCO C I.IIIMINIII • . . • • L U r. CO CO CO 0 N !1) N CO N 0 ^ to d' d' : 4 E :: 0) 0) 3 r r- .4- co %,„,#, 0 . . , . , co Ti- co M C C) . ' MCO N N. E 0 ■ co co co (O . . . = N O In )1,4,,,,), 7 N cow co u.... •• ;• C cc) co c)) 6 Lon N N OO' CO r %);. (‘ .: : i , ILL C ' L- CO M (-,.. N co 03Ni- M 2 : : i : : . l"' N. *- O CO : : : c tt) 4 4 d' . . : \ : . . rgi N. co • • • 43 Co ccry M 0 , r • C CO N. Lt) • , .. (5 O N• O) N N CO o CD10 � CONi r N CO d 0) 0) 0)0) T"' r r r , rn F z W , I r U 0 r-' > A A °z az o F Q7 d I0r' a w k co Q eL �� W I' 0s �'��y )14 - y`�; LfSIV ro D >gp. 1 1. Ed W z I� �� v� , ° �� - • �_, 'x x [� F t Z t, -,cr.,. % � �&3 az,, g J -,,,,,,,,,,..j _ 0 Ix co R-, fi- co E w co co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c:, oco O vi O �/ O �n O vi O v i --� [� �O �O v i ct ch M M N , SMO'TIVO IO Sl�IOI'I'IIIL1t °' aCD 0 8 P6-08a F- • z . ....,.........,.. ..,• 0.0.1/ w -46 noN = -. ICI, -46-1o0 U 94'9 -46-daS Q ,.) 0.4 -46-15nV a z 6 'E 461nf ........ :..... t; un vacO�i 9., -46 f aha -46LeW • VX 0U) VZ m4 -46-.1dV 222 -46-JeW Z $ gi.c7A -46-Qad 1 ; n e p R -• p6-Ue f __ z to F -E6-3aa 6O� k LU 111 la 0 J N g Si a - 1.O £6-noN 53 Z> 0)°-'m w?F ciz 4: O lfw • LO E6130 1LL0 ..J a y z Z £6-dGS I 1 o O 6.S £6-BnV LLQ 'i,, £E' E61of £6 u�f LLI p W. 61.* Cl) o S6' £6-Le141 Z £,Z £6-JdV 0 • •-£6-.IeW -£6 Qad a 2 -E6-uef Z6-000o LaL. "Z6-n0N r • 6S'Z T Z6-L0O U) ..LZ' Z6-daS 14 4 T Z6-6otl O LE': -Z61nf J -Z6-unf LL SO' ce Z'L T Z6 LeW W • £Z Z Z6 idV W Z6-JeW Z6-Clad • V • Z6 uef . • • L6-9O 2 L6 AON L1,1 • 16130 c v �•'L + 16-daS Y. = d S69 'g y 8 a ZZ'E 16-6"v °) m r E E L61of J .. E 2 94'1 L6-uof p 2 U m °i EZ 9 L6 LeW tam$'' { y c - L6 JdV ur v y ••-• eE9'Z 9 E 0 oa - L6-JeW ir C0 til 2 - L6-clad a) r, * L6 uer O pOp O O O O o O N J n t0 O M N O' O •. . SNOIIVJ AO SNOTIW 1 0 F t13-147-1 JJ5 by;11O F HUM Fit I K J WHS TE GUN I KUL I U r.F Metropolitan Council Attachment7 Working for the Region, Planning for the Future Wastewater Services February 6, 1995 Mr. Jay Kennedy City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024-1358 RE: Historic Empire Twp flow allocation Dear Mr. Kennedy: Enclosed you will find a summary of the historic flow allocation figures you requested during your telephone conversation with Staff Engineer Kyle Colvin on February 2, 1995. As you will notice that starting with 1981 only a portion of Empire Township was serviced with sewer through the city of Farmington. Prior to 1981 the entire Township was serviced through the City and by the local treatment plant which was then located near the east boarder of Farmington. The Empire treatment plant began operation in the fall of 1979 and the majority of the Township switched over to the new treatment plant in 1980. Only that portion of the Township located along 204th and 205th Streets, West and Colorado Ave. , West, currently flow to Farmington via a lift station which is owned and maintained by the Township. Please note that the enclosed table summarizes the flow allocation volumes for the Township between the years 1975 and 1994. Because of the sanitary sewer billing cycle and the way payment of sewer services is based on an estimate of flow for a given year, the flows may not necessarily reflect the total service fee (cost) that any community is paying for a given year. If you have any questions or require additional information please don't hesitate to call me at 229-2116. S rely, Donald S. Bluhm Community Services Manager Enclosures DSB:KLC;klc 230 East Fifth Street St.Paul.Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 222-8423 Fax 229-2183 TDD/TTY 229-3760 rtli-l�'(-1 l!N;l6ti I-HUM MtIh1J WHSIt UJNIKUL IU •ovr -.5r Historic Empire Township Flow Allocation 1975 thru 1994 February 6, 1995 1975 to Farmington Conn. = 36 * 85,000 = + 3 MG 1976 to Farmington Conn. _ (40 + 92)/2 * 85,000 . . . + 6 MG 1977 to Farmington Conn. = (100 + 129)/2 * 85,000 . . + 10 MG 1978 to Farmington Conn. = (129 + 147)/2 * 90,000 . . + 12 MG 1979 to Farmington Conn. _ (147 + 161)/2 * 85,000 . . + 13 MG 1980 to Farmington Conn. = 161 + 85,000 = + 14 MG 1981 to Empire WWTP Conn. = 109 * 95,000 = + 10 MG to Farmington Conn. = 52 * 95,000 = + 5 MG Total: + 15 MG FEB-07-1995 09:09 FROM METRO WASTE CONTROL TO 94632591 P.03 1982 to Empire WWTP Conn. = 109 * 95,000 = + 10 MG to Farmington Conn. = 52 * 95,000 = + 5 MG Total.: + 15 MG 1983 to Empire WWTP Conn. = 111 * 95,000 = + 11 MG to Farmington Conn. = 52 * 95,000 = + 5 MG Total: + 16 MG. 1984 to Empire WWTP Conn. _ (111 + 121)/2 * 95,000 = . + 11 MG to Farmington Conn. = 52 * 95,000 = + 5 MG Total: + 16 MG 1985 to Empire WWTP Conn._ (121 + 125)/2 * 95,000 = . + 12 MG to Farmington Conn. = 52 * 95,000 = + 5 MG Total: + 17 MG 1986 to Empire WWTP Conn. _ (125 + 164)/2 * 95,000 = . + 14 MG to Farmington Conn. = 52 * 95,000 = + 5 MG Total: + 19 MG 1987 to Empire WWTP Conn. =. (164 + 165)/2 * 92,500 = . + 15 MG to Farmington Conn. = 52 * 92,500 = + 5 MG Total: + 20 MG 1988 to Empire WWTP Conn. _ (164 + 165)/2 * 90,000 = . + 15 MG to Farmington Conn. = 52 * 90,000 = + 5 MG Total: + 20 MG FEB-07-1995 09:09 FROM METRO WASTE CONTROL TOyob 'i1 1-".e4 1989 to Empire WWTP Conn. = 165 * 90,000 = + 15 MG to Farmington Conn. = 52 * 90,000 = + 5 Mg Total: + 20 MG 1990 to Empire WWTP Conn. = 165 * 90,000 = + 15 MG to Farmington Conn. = 52 * 90,000 = + 5 MG Total: + 20 MG 1991 to Empire WWTP Conn. = 165 * 90,000 = + 15 MG to Farmington Conn. _ (52 + 59)/2 * 90,000 = . + 5 MG Total: + 20 MG 1992 to Empire WWTP Conn. = 168 * 90,000 = + 15 MG to Farmington Conn.= (59 + 60)/2 * 90,000 = . + 5 MG Total: + 20 MG 1993 to Empire WWTP Conn. _ (168 + 171)/2 * 90,000 = + 15 MG to Farmington Twp LS data = + 9 MG Total: + 24 MG 1994 to Empire WWTP Conn. _ (171 + 173)/2 * 90,000 = + 15 MG to Farmington Twp IS data = + 7 MG Total: + 22 MG KLC;k1c H Z P A i�661 U Ali £661 or, f:4 o Z66I a w o w 1661 H H •` 4 o0 0661 a w o 6861 H O w : •I' o 8861 3 Qvim, o L86I H H Q w0 H 4 ': c4 4 9861 " Q 5861 a N i7861 W " � £861 Q •• Q c4 Q w OZ cA Z861 N HWWS CA rf_ Q A H 1861 x ckw ' 4g z 0861 A aA ►q zO 3 6L6Im :82UAw rn A W W Wd ¢ WWa ¢ o 8L6ir Z E--. a w ¢ LL61 0. tM / f lit • rn 9L61 1 W = C) ' 1 SL6I '!1. M OM N O O t/1 O A O 2 3 � 'I'IVdN1Y I 3O SIIHDNI a xi MO'I3 SAIOZ'IVO MOI'I'IIIAI Y Co 5661 1-, J Z j t'6(�.4£ W ■ 17661 = U Zzw 9Z17£ ■ w — £66I. Q ■ Wp966£ m t Q oUI- Z - Z661 Z EL ` LZ.££ 0 z ¢ � J • otSYw � ' 1661 H co) V w 0 Z £Q£ rn - g 4 0 ■ Ili al W 0661 I- 2 Q •0.172 Z 0 1 V ■ � E � - 6861 w •'12 u_ p w i J • Oaf 0 9961 CCZ 1 w cn• Vfi.V2■ 0 g° r m _ iY 02 ' OZ L961. O 8.L£ zLL VO DO ' Ow 9961. r Z y ~ J Z CL W9Z w ¢ • < 0 CL ■ v _.. 9961 W O £8'8£ \ . ■ W 17861 ce EZ.•£ a ■ Ca ' £86L G 1.9£ `• W • ' Z861 U loi CL O ZO O8 - 1861 Fw O O w w a (/) o OHW ` 0861 Z C° W 0 O wQUZ P OMZZ T6L61 0• O -' Q CO c4 ill - 9L61. p O w ci J LL cc Z CC F' - LL61 0 Li 9L61 Nr N M N N Oin O Y J W IX (JW) viva SM3W O in WO Jd N1J. dO M.13 01 SMOII 1VfNNb-Naav 21vua3 t oc r •• 1.) U 0 miiimmommaysigi I 1 v 9 __,Iicrit I '' ------- 1 Li . , •in NMEll ,......, am .mow H arillim 6--;--e --4 aEll F\ Ell ,„, .,:z4 1 a MIMS =. 1 -1 _ UN ill k 0 IMO in MEI1M -4-44:.Inti - ,,,,„.. Via e, i Pte"' _Z ' .-0........ s ! I"CYi .Ii i 1 i ' ,ft • y�:?? � �� f•.r /� - ",__(,,,,,,I,i �> �_•�v ���� ♦ r ��' f ' �. ,•:••.-.'< ice'= �i 9 • t o rf r iC s u , :1i�' -- .vim }• '4$�.i,,• I i L4 J I rv�� t �t a / rid •"�• '' ! 1 ( raj fr. � � :; /� T y.. ''yams Y ..,T.,.??-..r.:7.7.7..._ .LI t '..'..-C Y - • •-._..._..,,_,,,, Y _ 4� ,,,,.1,.,-,A. .••••.' Y r... 1 .--1.... �C _ mow.. • -.- • •:..,.:,"-1.-1,1.1",r)::_4,,A-.,,..0:f.,t,--.0.4.4:,,''.1•..„,"..>, .--- ,A. ,,,,. , , .F . 4.''''.....,--4" f ..- qy • `#'O�' S r tea+ Z. /, / �ur' 4.' stI - /0Ar(• / ; / C.:z / 1 iP ' iii �'�/ .! . h, ph .. ' '. `t.,.1 ,.i---".,4. r+`4-.,c..,„„,...f:. ,. '( 1+ - - ,' } r , ..4 A'N{+.mss. '� t - � -�.— `,' try�e !r: • It rs rte, -1 d • - - ,t-;7',=."::---‘,L-7! '...-4”" " !•,•tyam .�'a2c�`�y`3s:. n'..e>'.. T.,! \ 5-4*.„,.....,_,..- • • T''^ 45 i >ya,.- Y� �' ,---1it�.„--7 •~ *'sr. -,-1...-1,-.C4,7-- - p.� • ..� del Y•,y.�'*y°s- '�.... ;:.. ` .-•� - •. 'S•�..�.'.��,�'r���.��. ��. _. .';?-- �.�is='e 'w'•Fw'1-ysZu��y�� 3 _ ;. - _ r.r fr.i }! .• J ,. •,T�" i. 1 • IN-It-, --- rz. --.. ..„-• • ,Au,...:,..4..,.....,-• _-. t ,,,.. -;-. -—.•:-.,., .-2:Li i,.. •- 2 prie,c).ii,-(2e RPL; A ........„..„..............„.. ..,.._ .. ., ,„,... . .,.. ar. . ..,,,•'4.1 7.,,,-,.........-•,,,,.., -.....•.....2,... -„..; /3 A 144 77.1 6,1,_.(�� /4--/-2.-,4f,;_7 /0 A M 7 'u�=' 7/r Attachment 10 AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 5m Name: Larry Thompson Department: Administration Date: March 10, 1995 Meeting Date: March 20, 1995 Category: Consent Subject: Proclaim April 23 - 29 as National Volunteer Week Explanation: Self explanatory Reference MaterialfResponsibilty Memo/Information - Larry Thompson Referred To: (Name) Department Department Heads Signature Minnesota Office on Volunteer Services -mous r January, 1995 Dear Mayor, It's time again to begin planning for Minnesota Volunteer Recognition Week, which coincides with National Volunteer Week, April 23-29, 1995. We know that your program relies on many volunteers throughout the year. The Minnesota Office on Volunteer Services (MOVS) can provide a variety of resources to help you recognize your volunteers and to strengthen your volunteer program. MOVS is pleased to provide a packet of promotional materials with the 1995 recognition theme, Stars of the North: Minnesota Volunteers. The enclosed materials are designed for easy adaptation to fit your volunteer program or community. A new item in this year's packet is a nomination form fora statewide volunteer recognition program, Acts of Kindness: Governor's Volunteer Award. The purpose of this distinguished award is to bring greater recognition and visibility to those who serve as volunteers as well as highlighting the significant impact that volunteerism has in our communities. Please help us to promote this award program within your city. Feel free to duplicate the nomination form or to call MOVS for additional copies. Volunteer recognition certificates, which are signed by the Governor and can be personalized for your organization, are also available to help you with your recognition process. The certificates are printed on grey parchment stock, with a maroon border and black type. To purchase the certificates ($5.00/packet, stock # 8-12), contact Minnesota's Bookstore at 612/297-3000 or 800/657-3757 (greater Minnesota). We invite you to contact MOVS to learn more about the resources and information available to help you strengthen your volunteer program. The enclosed Join brochure outlines in detail the key benefits of MOVS membership. We appreciate your special efforts in recognizing Minnesota's two million volunteers who shine throughout the year. Sincerely, KOAQ/Y\- (9-4aCAIN, Karen Leach Volunteer Program Specialist Department of Administration 117 University Avenue,St.Paul,MN 55155 Phone:612/296-4731(metro), 800/234-6687(non-metro) Fax 612/282-2411 TTY/TDD 612/297-4022(metro), 800/657-3783(non metro) MINNESOTA OFFICE ON VOLUNTEER SERVICES Department of Administration 1995 Minnesota Volunteer Recognition Week Sample Public Service Announcements 30 Second Announcement This is Minnesota Volunteer Recognition Week (April 23-29), which coincides with National Volunteer Week. Volunteers throughout Minnesota and the country are being recognized for their tremendous commitment and dedication to the betterment of our communities. Our 1995 recognition theme, Stars of the North: Minnesota Volunteers, illustrates the spirit of Minnesota's volunteers reaching out to help make life better for others. Join us as we salute the (organization, city or county) volunteers who are truly "stars" in our community. 30 Second Announcement Make a difference in your community . . . volunteer. Your special skills and effort can make the difference in someone's life. As a volunteer, you can help the elderly, tutor a child, work to reduce crime and drug use, feed the hungry and assist those with AIDS. Take time to make a difference in someone's life. This is Minnesota Volunteer Recognition Week. I'm (name) from (station/organization) asking you to become a volunteer -- Volunteers are Minnesota's Stars of the North! Call (organization and telephone) now to fmd out how you can become a volunteer. 30 Second Announcement In Minnesota, more than two million volunteers of all ages annually contribute volunteer service valued at $4.8 billion. Through their efforts, volunteers are helping to ensure a brighter future for Minnesota by being mentors, assisting with disaster relief, performing chores for the elderly, and responding to environmental and community needs. Volunteers are truly Minnesota's Stars of the North! During Minnesota Volunteer Recognition Week -- April 23-29, let's honor our dedicated volunteers and celebrate our volunteer programs that shine throughout the year. 20 Second Announcement The combined efforts of Minnesota's two million volunteers have a significant and positive impact on our quality of life in Minnesota. Many families volunteer together and today many corporations are encouraging volunteerism among their employees. Youth volunteerism is also a powerful source of community spirit and service. I'm (name) asking you to give special recognition to these Stars of the North: (city/organization) Volunteers during Minnesota Volunteer Recognition Week -- April 23-29. MINNESOTA OFFICE ON VOLUNTEER SERVICES Department of Administration 1995 Minnesota Volunteer Recognition Week Sample News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (Date) Contact: (Name, organization, address and telephone) Volunteers are Minnesota's Stars of the North To celebrate the more than two million volunteers who are serving throughout Minnesota, Governor Arne Carlson has proclaimed April 23-29, 1995 as Minnesota Volunteer Recognition Week. The week coincides with National Volunteer Week. This year's recognition theme of the spirit of giving is Stars of the North: Minnesota Volunteers. Minnesotan's of all ages serve as volunteers throughout the year by making their communities better places in which to live. Volunteers provide support to the hungry and the homeless, mentor at-risk children, deliver meals to the elderly, assist persons with disabilities and help with environmental and civic projects. Minnesota volunteers are truly the Stars of the North. They shine throughout the year with a strong sense of community loyalty and a commitment to reach out and help those in need. Last year, approximately (number) people volunteered from (your community or organization), to (give examples of activities/projects that impacted your community). Their extraordinary efforts are a challenge for everyone to make a difference in the lives of others. Join us as we honor our star volunteers at our annual (your recognition/awards ceremony, date, time and location). For reservations contact (name, address and telephone). (see reverse side of this page for sample public service announcements) MINNESOTA OFFICE ON VOLUNTEER SERVICES Department of Administration Fact Sheet on Volunteerism National Adult Volunteer Statistics Midwest Adult Volunteer Statistics Source:Giving and Volunteering in the United States,1994 Edition, Source:Giving and Volunteering in the United States,1994 Edition, INDEPENDENT SECTOR-1993 Gallup Survey INDEPENDENT SECTOR-1993 Gallup Survey • Percent of population volunteering 48% • Percentage of population volunteering 64% • Estimated number of volunteers • Estimated number of volunteers 18 years of age or older 89.2 million 18 years of age or older in Minnesota 2 million • Average weekly hours served per volunteer 4.2 hrs/wk • Average weekly hours served per volunteer 3.7 hrs/wk • Average annual hours per volunteer 218.4 hrs/yr • Estimated annual dollar value of adult • Estimated annual hours volunteered 19.5 billion/hrs volunteers in Minnesota $4.8 billion • Annual dollar value(formal volunteering) $182 billion • Per hour dollar value of volunteering • Per hour dollar value of volunteering (based on average non-agricultural wage, (based on average non-agricultural wage, plus 12%benefits estimate) $12.13 per hr plus 12%benefits estimate) $12.13 per hr National Youth Volunteer Statistics Midwest Youth Volunteer Statistics Source:Volunteering and Giving Among American Teenagers 12 to Source:Volunteering and Giving Among American Teenagers 12 to 17 Years of Age,1992 Edition,INDEPENDENT SECTOR-1991 17 Years of Age,1992 Edition,INDEPENDENT SECTOR-1991 Gallup Survey Gallup Survey • Percentage of youth volunteering 61% • Percentage of youth volunteering 71% • Estimated number of volunteers • Estimated number of volunteers 12-17 years of age 12.4 million 12-17 years of age in Minnesota 249 thousand • Average weekly hours served per volunteer 3.2 hrs/wk • Average weekly hours served per volunteer 3.2 hrs/wk • Annual hours volunteered 2.1 billion • Estimated dollar value(formal volunteering) $7.0 billion Source:Minnesota Department of Education • Volunteered five or more hours per week 17% • MN school based service-learning volunteers: • Schools requiring community service hours - Elementary school-age volunteers 75 thousand for graduation 8% - Middle school-age volunteers 29 thousand • Schools that offer courses that require - Junior high school-age volunteers 15 thousand community service as part of the course 21% - Senior high school-age volunteers 29 thousand • Students who volunteer at schools that • MN school districts that offer service- encourage community service 75% learning opportunities 79% • MN school districts that offer credit for youth community service 42% Who Volunteers National Volunteer Service Source:Giving and Volunteering in the United States,1994 Edition, 1987-1993 INDEPENDENT SECTOR-1993 Gallup Survey Percentage of respondents • 89.2 Million Americans over age 18 volunteer 60.0% 54.4% volunteenng • 48%Of adult Americans volunteer 51.1% • 44%Of males 47.7% • 51%Of females 50.0% 45.3% • 61%Of teenagers between 12-17 years • 43%Of people between 65-74 years 40.0% • 54%Of persons employed full time • 62%Of persons employed part-time 30.0% Motivations for Giving and Volunteering • 68%Were active in student government 20.0% • 66%Have volunteered before Aver volmrage weekly hours peceer • 62%Parents volunteered when they were young 10.0% 4.7 • 61%Had belonged to a youth group 4.0 4.2 4.2 • 57%Wanted to make a significant change in society i -� ■ • 56%Saw someone in their family helping others 0.0% • 54%Saw someone they admired helping another 1987 1989 1991 1993 • 540/0 Were helped by others in the past Source:Giving and Volunteering in the United States,1994 Edition. 12/27/94 kl.vrw.fac National Trends in Volunteerism * INDEPENDENT SECTOR'S 1994 survey, "Giving and * * Volunteering in the United States," shows that in the last four * * years there has been a continual downward trend in giving and volunteering in America. The survey found that overall volunteering was down from 54 percent in 1989 to 48 percent in 1993. Most of the decline in volunteering came in the form of Stars of the North: informal volunteering, such as baby-sitting for free or baking Minnesota cookies for a school fair. In the Midwest, however, iblunteers volunteering has increased during this same period from 58 percent in 1989 to 64 percent in 1993. The most significant increases in volunteering occurred among senior citizens, age 75 and older (36 percent volunteered, up from 27 percent in 1990) and among divorced, separated and widowed persons (40 percent volunteered, up from 36 percent in 1990). More than one out of four volunteers (27%) volunteered five hours per week or more. Based on these fording, it is estimated that 23.6 million adults in America volunteered five hours or more per week in 1993. When asked personally, people are more than four times as likely to volunteer than when they are informed by other means of the need for volunteers. Among the 45 percent who reported that they were asked, 82 percent volunteered. Those respondents who were least likely to be asked were African-Americans and Hispanics; families with household incomes below $20,000; those who are single, divorced, widowed or separated; and persons who are not employed. However, when asked, these groups volunteer at a similar or even higher rate than the national average. Young people whose parents volunteered were nearly twice as likely to volunteer as adults when compared with those respondents whose parents had not volunteered. Among the 44 percent of respondents reporting that one or both of their parents had volunteered, six out of ten volunteered as adults. In addition to membership in religious organizations, memberships in a whole range of associations, such as voluntary organizations, civic associations, fraternities and sororities, alumni organizations, service clubs, business and professional societies and political organizations are associated with very high levels of giving and volunteering. Having had a direct experience in a youth group and having volunteered when young clearly leads to significantly higher rates of volunteering as an adult. As an example, among the 56 percent who reported that they had belonged to a youth group or something similar, 61 percent volunteered. Nearly three-quarters of respondents (73%) agreed that charitable organizations play a major role in making our communities better places to live. Statistics on volunteering by adults are from "Giving and Volunteering in the United States,"1994 Edition, conducted by the Gallup Organization and analyzed by INDEPENDENT SECTOR, Washington, D.C. -over- AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 5n ULD Name: Wayne Henneke• Department: Finance Date: March 10, 1995 • Meeting Date: March 20 , 1995 V C Category: Consent Subject: Hire Full Time Police Secretary/Finance Accounting Clerk Explanation: Request to hire Toni Schefchik as a full time employee to be used 50%/50% between Police and Finance Departments Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo - Wayne Henneke Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Dan Siebenaler Police Toni Schefchik Police/Finance Rosemary Swedin Finance lAC / Signature Memo to: Mayor& Council Date : March 15, 1995 Re : Approve request to hire Full Time Police Secretary/Finance Accounting Clerk Toni Shefchik is currently the P.T. Police Secretary. During most of 1994 and to date in 1995 she has also been working part time for the Finance Department without receiving benefits of full time employment. She is very knowledgeable in accounting. During the change over of the utility billing system she helped Arvilla get the system going and during Rosemary's absence during 1994 carried out the duties of that position. She was also very valuable in preparing for the 1994 Audit. The position of Part Time Accounting Clerk will be responsible for Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable. She would also help in the balancing of cash on a monthly basis. The City has never had a person who could take control of accounts receivable and that is a large problem for Finance. Toni has already begun establishing a system that will work for her to accomplish the task. Toni Shefchik is a very valuable employee to me and I would request that she be hired as a full time Police Secretary/Finance Accounting Clerk. The part time position she is currently working in is paid a Grade 2 salary of$8.76 per hour. It is recommended to keep it at that until the Compensation Committee has a chance to grade the new position. 4)a/ Wayne E. Henneke Finance Director c.c. Larry Thompson, City Administrator Dan Siebenaler,Police Chief Toni Shefchik weh AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. "1a., Name: Charles Tooker Department: Administration 0(4 Date: March 6, 1995 Meeting Date: March 20 , 1995 Category: Petitions, Requests and Communications Subject: Pole Building for Northern Natural Gas Company Explanation: The new supply distribution center for Northern Natural Gas requires a storage facility. The most economical square footage can be achieved through use ot a pole building. Much ot the existing site is developed using pole construction, but this took place before Chapter 5 was added to Title 4. Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo - Charles Tooker Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson Administration Karen Finstuen Administration Charles Tooker Administration John Manke Administration 01444 1.7 Signature MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: POLE BUILDING FOR NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY DATE: MARCH 6 , 1995 Northern Natural Gas Company has created a materials management department which will be responsible for purchasing, handling and storing required materials. Farmington has been selected as one of five sites to serve company needs. The existing site in Farmington does not have enough warehouse and office space to accommodate the new department. The proposed building will measure 60 ' x 200 ' , including a 24 ' x 60 ' office area. The pole building will be installed by Lester Building Systems and will include wood framing, steel siding, a steel liner for insulation, and will be placed on a poured concrete floor. In December of 1993 , the City Council adopted an Architectural Design and Materials section to the City Code which, in Section 4-5-4, restricts the use of pole buildings to Agricultural and Conservation Districts unless otherwise authorized by the City Council. "Council shall exercise its discretion in determining whether or not a building of such type will be compatible with the surround- ing area. Such uses may be authorized by the Council for use as a warehouse, heavy equipment storage, or other uses which would tend to be compatible with that type of structure and in a location where it would not be offensive to other property owners or persons within the City. " Because the entire facility currently in place at the northernmost corner of the intersection of County Roads 50 and 31 was built prior to the adoption of the Architectural Design and Materials section of the City Code, the question of pole construction never came up previously. From the snapshots taken on site, it appears that the proposed facility will fit with those that exist. The photos also indicate the extent of screening provided by evergreen plantings. The Soil and Water Conservation District has indicated that the proposed building will not encroach on any protected wetlands. The request was reviewed by the Development Committee and no issues were raised that would stand in the way of allowing the requested construction. Recommendation Approve the requested structure subject to the submission of a grading plan, paving plan, plus proposed plantings associated with the building. 1-7 /al"' Charlie Tooker City Planner .. I .. 1J 0 ' .3 N i 1r-A RnvSA./ 1TMAY INDUSTRIAL PARK . I _ . ore nkw w m.Nara f/+.1 a•M.aw•I f/.et Section NI.� . J\ S 00 334 02 w T w X. II X ' 241 N X X --------101? i II ' d a l p t M4.44 �: Tag W 1 I �y" 0060 ( II I �__ 292'8 t i 1 > • 1 u u a n a 11 Pt x I '`-11 � Z C 3.. _. 1 i I \ I a " i 'm (117 I � o p °53z 1 Z Z n ! II - PNOrWEORUNINOUONp[ - -� ` Z 1 X p '. .\ In z2 ^' '' I g .44 i /) .'N/I y V1 y I '+Jj /f,,,p 1,� II x 1_ JP*OPOSIOW AllElauEfAr� \ to I; I m x • = a I°a. I- 4 \IIi lit I E. • ., �:; 1 xOD g (011 , p x O 7g 1 n - a. 5.., ® x O R -- _-_-- a ** lv^�7:Z c... ^ ) p..AaT[hTONAY! X y I . `�. �/�7E9[..vv.r-...... t/) * 'it ■ i:: : O 0 : 9r .'r i +{i,+ i ° ----_--3;;;3---:----.:7-43 -, -:---.70;;;T9--; 803.23--- --------:=7:-:---;„)1 R I s 0000'00•E '/ ' II ;1 _ _ _ _ L1__ - - - - '- - -- • N. XJiT11 ]iT7\ /LI - 11 - o I. © It I x . p oN NII ' X n 1 W x iIPIIP ,...M I$ ii9 1 e f'V y.oM.p pb`.- I N 1!i ,' ,' ' Irl / x �' �` R: 1 i I m x// aja .! I. • x eB I x lr Y figli 11 . v A gas; �9; x I x o r u i 1 :Y '!:19I'x^ . /Ii I 4 Jip21_ sd I ; X s sEn a � 1 tiaY:a x t j x k • 2 • 147 ---41.S -li 4:1.‘ ) CO 3 killita I I2 s aov7SY[ x 1.. } i �yl ! 111;1 Y i I•I x x ''b 4 mails >� I flifflil I x i4 iJ N I r'h>L x x { ~ �1 x E Is .o•Mh �vViij y n,. x f .c 3 r r I- 1 i )t X 8 iG p <24' . .':' c';. =�• z X 1 'f ' x x x--2./ z Lco _(_ i H 0103'13 E 8 0 — — — — — - - --` - _ - _ - - - �L _ _ N 01 rn G••II •r M rl.a 1/7 of fM N.a...f I/1 SWIM 3& 1 > ••••••••:•••••....:".•'.•:•::•••••••:•:•:•::,•:"...;',..:•'•:••••'::'•:;''••••••••••'•••• '-•:•••••••••••••••••• . -...•••••••••••' :::••••:•••[24'".:1;.;•;12-'•;;.:',;'•-',ik:.;•...*:•'••••••;.••• •••• -. • . . .• • •••••.''••••••:•••. •':: :. r•••••••••••••••:•.:••••••••:••••••••••••••••;:•••••::•••."••••••••••••••• ...".....:'.....:.::::•...•••;:.'.:::::.'.';:.:;•••:•.-1:••••:•!:••• ::;.......::•....;•.':•::.•:::.•::.• -• .......:•. •••:•:..12...",,..1;.:;.:::f4::'"•%:::1••,*•:4:7:,.:••:.::::•'.::•...• •• •••• ••• ••••••••••:•:•••:•:'•••••••'....-...•••'. ...:.•.:•-.•*-.*:'.:•••••.::.....••••:•••••••••••:::::::::••••••:.:.:::.' ,.........,,••••••.•:::::'.....:;.-.:'. •••••••••••......:.:•.:• --,...'• •••:••:. ..:: ••••.•:••••. • .: ;........ •:. .•"••':•;v'',•:,`,.,ef.....:;1'.••...,'2",,;:;:e..;"•.";•.:.,.::.: . :•• •• -;• '. • ''.• •••. ...1•...• .:. -:.';'.........•:: :.........: 2::.•.•••••.:........:•.......;• -:•.. ..„.• ....,• ••„• . . , . ‘ . . . .. . . . . . • • I 1 ••••••,:i.11,. I: . •• • \ • ..,t . ,...,:t,,,,•,, . .,,.,..... , . ;Mv,i,v li• i\ •41•'''Itu. , •. • ,.,..1. , . . v.':;- i .ot -•4 - • v.'' * Irivg!...,,,,,i, .!;,::,,,,,i6:,,•6,..!,,•,',;',.',,,,,,;',',,..:.4e • : ' ' ': . • , • • , \ •,:,, •., -,„! , .• I.,., ,T .1.1,4.44A „ :: 1 lii ii.''' A.:' 1:,•,. , iVIT.14.i.. • . , , ; .1,44F ,.. ,‘ ., • ' le i ,'...1,;"*.....i.f• "•:.:. *-. .1 • :, • , .... 1 • '1 v- ,:••- • -7 .• - ' • ,I, .... .'., • . •• , .:4'.kg.vw,•;:.':"{:. . . .' :iffr• ix„'' 11'"? l'..‘',....q.,• '' • ' !. I 1 . 'r ')'i.,‘•,'J112: ke, 't,..^ " 1 11 I '';'••.) . tr•4 .. • 41 , • • d , wit• • C.'•-T. •v ••• t, ", : ' ,•'t•Iv , ,, . 4," 4 . I.,I.,:ili :_. , ''' , , \ . 1? . . • 4' . .,4, , :44;:%,.7, ' • ' r''f •T Cl) V). 'fit I.. r... ' 1 4!, . .1 • ,,",.......;iiilv, n , : 1 • rs.•‘' . , ,. • 1 .. . • . .:1 •'.,t "Vt . '; 4r' • ' i 0 'I ,,,,41% , • ...ed '—''' •-: —.2-i• ---- -fY1,•• )-4 rri•':1 -:, ' n . y,'fr,...;•.2.• 1 )--i 1--( 1 ' J.:•'''' ,I,. 11:11 .• 5 .„ 0 t ' :.•••••• - ! I ' 1 i tt Cl) il :t;.7; .14 1 N.,:,.,.... b .I' • ,J /"Ci ' '..: IC, *-.. •,,,,,. , 11:1 .„ 4,,I . , .....„,..-7,-,„ ,0 , •C...a*V .>1;I, ...' I PZ/ 0 '..: .i..,... n 7'-'.-•-: ,-%v ' .1 tli a•'' i -.•. • v .ii.1 1•, 1 -.'i 'trvml. ;40',.;!r._ •.,,..:, • 1"; . . f ..it, 34 **0•:*....if'3,',1#' :7:1 . tri tT1 , CV P: : '1.:.• ,,,..i.r•:-.:•:''.:-1:-.f-7..;...:-.:--;- 0C .• i . I •v "v ..• r-,...t.',...:,',..:,..-.74.•., , . i .' . . • s,/4 i ' 1 ,L-4 r) • .1 • I - :...,..'•:.• • . e P -. . ..... .- ,. , ,k fiii ; ••••• . . C4 trl '1'11' 1:.11°1' ,_3 v,_., . !•:., ... . . 1,,/i 1 ,...., :,• , , Lb. ,, . r ' .. ,.. .. 47 .i ,, ), A.; !.'1 c, t=1 5 .. .. , • . pci.i', .;',.... _. i.,,. , ,...., • . .,.,•'•k....4.0-illl '4J • 1. •:•:',.1:..,',1110):,,o;s•'•-! 4.1'.' ••• f 't.. • • ' I/ •: L:,,.. ..11 ;11 ., Aim 1 11 1 „4, ; • • • .. ,Irpirif 1','• 0.' • el •• ••'.i•-1;:!••*"'':i.i,f'-....,-'' - ' .. ' '•,,,.;;;.,,...;.,..;, , • ,' e•I,9 i,• . y ,, id , ,, , ..,,.,0,,..,k '';1 "1• , •• ' ••• .•7/1)-..14,' •••,,k-it -•''.• . : e .•, ;.f.,t ;2,Ati f4,,,:','•,-, —— • •:• ,....0. v. 1,11 0 . ,,,,c,e.._ '''::,=-;,:,,4..•,sf,v‘..'.;.,:y:.•.:,•• ; 1;_‘•vvi. \ v: 1 , ', • - - .•- • :•'..,r•••:1•"1...-.•-,,,,1•!..",, ' ,: ,' •.--"`!"-.4it'f'st:,•J,'•':••: • •-.• , .,.....',1,i• '-`t'',•".11,,'_"'.,.',-;.•:,,'.„ ' r•,, 0 likli....,••• ,‘ ; \ ''''. s'k` , . . . 1, •.,,,, ,: • , , • • / •'.. ', I: :-.;-. .. ,..,.41",,,‘,..ek, '..'..,-(.,1.i., , ,,,,,,,, : , ,:i....\,"lk,o,kt '' ' ' ,,-A;(.. ,... ., 4. .. • ,,,f,,g. ,i,„%ti,:,,,... . . ,1 ,....,..‘,,,,,, •',...•.),t4:ift,,!L.,., • k!) *.k1:1‘,:.\,,,: ,1.•-•' - , • .1.,,7.,),,,;0.,,,,...1.).,v:I.,•,-.t.ri`•• • i ..,...,it ,...;...: . ' ':•:,:li.:4,,%t 4. ,''‘ 1 I' .AI.' .' II i' :' . ; ,:*..\,„A:•,‘,..i.,N.,,,i.',,,,e.,,l'f. N!1.fr!.34 k,t. -•,:••.'"!:'r-r4 • A \' 1" ' '''Illiiii,,i•'t 4,1,,•0.\\1.'' i .,0‘• •'''r4••!.V";‘,V1.,r P',.-11 ,4;',;•: •. '',",•.77.,,,,'.,ifliA.1•2'4-4 • i I \'" '41‘.'4\ '' , li•:..;, ••t •. l'., , ,3`,..? m' . ‘‘, .t• .• . ':j.,.6,-;.01 .`'':. ‘: it.:1'. -,'. 'r;•''',-•°`4•1-'•'•••• •e;/..,t,: ,,,..,,,t., ',+1,/,':;(;•.,ri'• •'.'.4':i'll'''' . 1 :', ' . \I..%,.• 1 A. ' ' .• '0 " '# '•'e"'410; ,i14:41,',., 1 ','I I ', - ••-• ,, • . • ','t14J'clA1 ' , • ;1,1, ,•, , . ' ; •,,41trrhi. , Ai,,.. ,,,, -:,•,'..,'";?•:„ \t,i ',,\''.,,'.I I,:1,, ', ' : —'I'''. -- ,., ,...'-iiliq• •'..'I :' v 71'11 ',,. 4.14,Ar, ' .4' 'Y''' • il' : ,•, \i` . !I'. •' .•' . • - i- i *' .1,,,:.*''N.'ill, • 1 ,'•)'.-„',., • ,'''• i.I'S I'''"..:i. e . : '. ikti.,... . , ., 4.,..., . ;+''; i'.1 •' 1 l'; ' ' ., . i ' . q krOikt.,i1.01.,.'11 i.'4„,..q),.:i'Air''S.... •.,,,',,'.4 , 1. • , ,... . ' i .1 77,!...C.::',,...'.'..‘ . ' '';C.:','‘;'fiA:gi)''*..t;t ., I il phirg..4,41.4. ,.,,.,.,, ,,:t,„ , ,4t5, . .:.,,,.. ,t.„.: ‘,,,:•,. .. .04i1 ,,,..t,. . • .. ,,,,, ,,..,• Y a 1 r, , ,,,‘,. .i,, : .10:1?‘I:II,.,:,. .I. ', '..:: • .i X ' ' .'•'.I.1,,,Y".41.40, :',r.?•,.•,q)'". ".:t• , :'-,:i•'.:: rH, ,..,. :f..,..,,,- ..„,.... . . 10. . . . . 1„ „. ,„..,,,. ..,,,o,y ' '•1,i , 1,i;‘a'r /, .4... . '. . , ,'it,vt. . .' • I.1'.- ,r;,. .. • . • .._ v,..:AV.t-' ,,'"'i . •, I • , I, {t . _ 14:..i ',,T ., t.,, ..,',- '•,':'',:itI= • . • • ., '5,,,„_":11;'I , It .1.. • ., ,:'.•• ' ',t!'' • 1 • i;oft•t I,t,0•la ..., '' 'I c"'-.14,,,,'E, ' ‘ t• , 4'' ' - •'-'%• '•,!, i 1. p ' ''s • , ., tr,•1,y, ij114, , 4141 , r, • '-''',•,:•.','e,,,,,li;•• .. ' . .. . , ' -.);''rj,,,..p ' • . i. 4.' 4 4.^C ',..,'!'•,t• ••:4-',, ', . ' ", i" °7- , I ' ....P „ „,,,,,, . , .1,. , . • .,,I. ., , , 1 'C.;'.!:'4; • ig :Is', ..• '.. • ' , . .' ' .., : .,•......,:. 1 I .. ,• i,;...c..."7 7-.....:',,e'...i.V.f. .,.•••%. — •''''.7'-•• . :-."..'.:.••••(, IL ,i, ' t ,4, ., - • . ' ..\,•,•.,,:'.''i•• ; i •. ,••• .' • .,, - . . ,,. i V.Y.,li_ii.,;-..?.Y:,,..,•:,:te>,,a,•,;,•i ..,,,i.-3.1t4t: . . • •', • r, • • ' ,"• i . I:,•sP• 1)..!,:.JP '....-.4 -'1,4,:;7•••.-.. ,,ixif,,.., *• , .:1•',),,,,i.41,'0,' ,..i. J., : ' ,,., •,,, .1 .,. • .. , 31, '%,...,*.1,..,-,,,I;.,;•S?fi.;,,,,,•:, ..',4,4,i4,iLe.,„•-,,^,•.,1 - . , •,',•;•t',0'3,' e.;1.,:lv i . ie• , • 4'41'• .1. • • - 1 1 <:4.41*,..,,4:1'1,..t,_?5,',t;it'ic:•.e Ar,..*•• -4404.,„•• ; e' r If.• ,t;,''. 4,..,!•1.'•.:'•,'`z •.7- ( "- ' ' • ,, 1':. . ,'1 , . it 1, I .i: :.1 `.4 "..7,04"),. ' ?„,Ier ' • '' 0 •A_ ' 'itt;,•• ' it'• . . ......,./4,,:.t'. .,• : . ‘!• W*1 . * ' , • I .",j-*.fe •:•'4,'''1'N' It;$ • ' t' . I .'..,.•..,N .,1,,e 414 , •,... I ,. 6; `‘,'4,11 I ' . .' (.. V.Y.,,t#Y 4,'. ; 1\'''' '''I.'.:1 Ilff'.''''"' .) "' . •' I'1 IIIA .14 ,' •ii '1 • ,1,11'.4t:';';,i'it. '''' '-•''I;'.'.° ey)i,.',/0,1 , I:,'.'• ; • 6 L 6. .' ,, • . i • . ili, :,I,i'il'`k•s:'.. l'!!l'!;.,Ii;S:"4''I ftt 1'.- '‘ •'. , ''Y,'-Vt,'.'',',i,.' •1 i'''i 6('' ' : , .I'k' '. , , . / • ' 3 '1 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,;.,,,,,.1.•:•$:,::,!5•.,.:•::..!,•!.:I..-:f. : ,14.,,..t.„si,,„ , ,,, : „z.A.,,,., 555 ;..;,r,..,;,:' ,,,oit.',,i•••°,1;,:•',i'-'1,' . ',..%.,-1, -• :II 1, 4 '.'; I s. ,•:,q;v,,•.,,,,:4,4:`"•••.. :: . P'', "••.t , \ • 1.i ''?',.• \ ..,, ` i1,4„•.. ti-:,,',•,',••'.••, . • • W44.,,, '' • I 1'. : .t 4 '•• .4 t . . '' ) ....- ‘.!' • ,....:•,; .,,,..utt40,„; ,..._ ,. ,. I, . ,.' 10, .. , : '- I ; ,., L....1i.,..,,,•.,,;.‘,7,,-,,,f,,,,,,.,,,,,F..:.,••••• .,.• .,,, li,g4,,.....;,..,,,..,„., . . .1 ,,ii , M -, ! : ....:'; . . • • i . ' ,. •'‘ , •,......,"-Y,./....-•,:•,',;'''': , . :..•;',.;••'•'*"?, .,•,*.•;• ' .• •l...,''s, ',,,;•7,'.'i ''+ ., •i*itp',‘'1%.•,'. . •• t, I. • i,''t 'V'''''‘•,-.'k'.. '.','':,'1•S • I.), t , I.,:t r,ci,14„tli k' 'Yi •1! I ,11' ”-4—. 'i!••.:p•r3V1 (...jiti NY.,...,!T,,,,, :I , .:,. , %, 4, r:. 40 V rk...''41) 4.1!'''' IC.)1.' ,.-T : 'rt., .'''xi!:!`•,:‘, ''.:;,:::,i• .Ve':ri;44(;:t'!'•.:.: tr- 1' r III [..' -.:',41;:!:"PkIiii) '',,'•••i.i.r; 1;1'k•••...-•,, • ,,t'' ' -.V'1!•1 ',,•;-'4,,,t il'3-,S,,filr''.•,I,:1,S.'''.';'' -; ;•-,,••: ,' i•1 e,. • II.: •704-ki',144' .; ; '.. .'., •,,',1 t,d ,' '.4.-2is.',.4!:',"7::,/,' .,...;•,,.•: ,.._,:,:,,/,:!..A-t.$4:(,..,,,-..-;., :. .,,, , ,... 1.•: , • . . • . - . . :, • • 1.\ 1; —1, i I ,.. ,. , 1(. ..• 'u", • ' . :' 'V.), .,.. i • 1 0. il t .1, •, el,.11,..y,, . ?, ' . .' 01 k,:,, 74„,,,iti1,1,71. , ; 1 . ..!.1.. , .'1-,,,,,,,,,i,,,-.:,,,, • , .1,o .,e 1 , .1 4. r L., ..jr.v,..,ilf-,i .). t i i 2.•..Iti.l.' Pg..."'...,,'. '..1.10.,' Afri5 ,/, • , ' • "-. ::,?1,',.4',,' ',10.i..','•... . ii 0 Iiii . 1 I A. ).' $44,,))414 t(1 k (14, 11 i ' ...c.. ,I.:(if '"'':',.:, '. -.'',.:,i.Y,,', , • 11 .1 ' 1 (ri. i ' t....•-1,---- - — '' ' ' VI{ '•' 1* ft' . - .,i n.,,'-., ,•,:,!,,,,, • ti I -41:.;;''''..e''.'t :•14' ,t:fit I'•••',•.; , li , -. •-„..i ., ''',I;i1,, ••,+ti,,,,•,. •.. . il , . •tt) I 1,, .r ,;`.\';',';,'•4',*vo'' s•';',(AltP,, 111 -',,. `"';''•',,, i'' • '•s,':'4•'. •',1i';',,',,',,•:;,,,.: • . • , '2 1,t1 . 'I 1. . ; ? ik '',':13•PttS",, ,.., 1.'` • •••'',\'‘e\ ,'k; ', 3 ill'ir'IV 5.' 1. ' ;"-: ' '''''''',4;'..-.14:''''''..,;;.'",..'„,' '' ' , 1., '',Iti \t'.. ! :,! ‘ ' 11::„ l' i 1 r.:14—ti. is...ijkll L\,,,,'I., C. 11.10,.,:,,t'',..'. ';i; i !,• " i r' klIt\VP.$1:t.lif ri,L': ., ',, ‘ 14•:. l'''' i'V' .up:.,i 11.,. .. , ,!„,,,,.1. tt;,..11 .....,. I, . s7,.`, 1,t,,'‘, .4, •','•;,1 q • I it 'pk •-•`‘i, '.:11 r!11,i1',',,, .: /c.t • ..*i , •,lt ",. '151,.tfi..!-•: j' l', i 1„,1 • ,19i. ivA.- .t. ‘ '. \ s,:?,y,.,, „, . .,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,.,..,. ,. ,, , ,,, ,, . , 1: , , , — , , , " ., - , 1.1,, i•01' .':.:;,:,,,,,t;,..-e,;•.-•• -.,' , • •..... 1,i( ;,-, y .1,-.;, ,• [i.yii,;;',,'?''''''.,;;',,. ,'• ' .',.'Ili:,.... A ilk, f- ' ' (,'. tt • ' • i. ..,„,,, ,4';,,, .. . '1,•'• f .# .,%,••• ' ,) rtt..''', a • t ,,... • .ve,„taftr,t...)Y.'...• • g;' . ' '. ra :, '1, \ .4 .., , ,.,....;;,.4,,,..,1• .,t.,. ,ii,. 1 II,„I!, . -, ..',,;';`'1.'..`4";r.?;•,i,•,•:,:: ' ' ' i ''I'l, ' ,44 • ,•, , . i . lit- ....,, 'i:,.;i:•.' . 4 lif,'111:,• •i•i• "•••':. ' .. \ . 1 :,;;?,,WL,,i4',!:r•I...-• J; • f 11k1:, I 1 •• i q ..',1....',, l 1::.,:4:t.'- .. . ,,,,,Ai,....7,!,,,, . . . : .,,,,,,fpg.1,,,,,,,),-....,... .. .. f..,.;. . ,I , • .- _ ,IIiiil, ,I. , - 4" . .1, .1,,,‘ ,,•.,, . . ;I, V ' :' . • .1../,i 1 'Iii ' , • .,4 .; i • ',up:A f . , .4. I ii„ li.i..'1,1'/,1 • f' ,. %:7 ',If;,.( .'• . . " . '41 sr,,i4j '' * '. '111...,,1%re•Ilkil ''' ' P:Y.ft'i';‘,l'i• ':',:',,,'OV„.:,..:i", .,' • .. .?',.';', Ci.v.4.c . ' • 1; s 19,;`),14k,',,'',!,,••• „ ' i , . ..' 1 kl ' ).(;:..j,, )' I °II , •,-, ...( A'..41(. •1 .i:1;i'it.0 1., II! i '''':,0Vi:'il''''..4' , ''''' i ..•,..,,,,I.,:,,,,r,'„i4„..,L,,,i;t.,,,„•.:..,' . l' .• '-t.. •-• ,. •• ,i • ?..t At..., ,J. 4,,:,;11/11 ; .1., ' .• . ..,y 7:1 , ‘1.;'.1,'"';',4!,,,,,'.•:.,..; ..,,'‘, . ; c 1 „. ...., • ' ,.!'.e: 4 , A;,•;,,, , s r • .'',1;i',` 1',%I V.,"' '71,'''',;* ' ..,.:;";'' '''0",''''. ''':'.'• ' i ili °T, I' '41 :' Ili 1' ' ., — ,,..'-.„., ii;.V.., . , , • li , , t. .. , c," : 11 ':.'ll ,; 1/!, ,1 'i ' '..'''.-: ,. ilr.!i.i`,:' ,1"; ' I. 7I.. 4. 'A: ',t?.,,..1,,,t ,.. .' - .4' ; ,,,,, -„..,...7, .< % .....,•4*,,;•1, 'i‘„ 1 i . • '•'''..;;{'./1"*.'2,,i;,'? ..;. . ' ' 1..:‘ i•j),!• • . ' v '''''.1.(1/fi i'' 'i • • . '4, ?. !.t 1 , )1 '.( : s''';•il 1 :ji '; f If •• ,i t' 1..1(',1,. li'' 1' $ 0 ' — • ,v 4 41 •., -.21., ,"..,i,i",,I. ' e I .0 Y. • . 1 ..4 I '....,/ :4', i. "*.i.',it: ;1.i li i , s • ,f, k 1 -, ,„r ,' (I) 1.. I J '" ,"1.. ,:i.'iiii ,t ,1, , . i•, . ,,t ,;.,,,t.., , , ..,•. .r.,!, :: .4,,s,•'::-.`,:',' • , '; It:4 ' ',.. , I '',g,/, I , I W :.' . i 01 4. .:" .! .... ,W,'' k '.• ' - ) i''' . , n'l ,,,:if,,,,,,,.- •...- ... .,‘ • —- ,... . .,. . , . ,., ,,,•" ad4 . • ,,,. ;,,.1 i,,,,„,..c • ,! ...,•.;•,„9...7"..!..f..,,.. , , .:.,. ,.. .• ;I •r,!• * ,,‘ •,,,,!;';1.,P i'..4;?: I .,•.•,,,i 4‘..''',ai-'!';'''' '". ...t lin r. . 1. .•1 '"' I A ' . ''''i ' ''''i ,'''''''' " -4 ' YiiVt,, ,,,i,•,',..',";:;.••., . • ' 0!., l' fi,li ic 1 'hi. ., 1.i!Ili 1 i I, • ...,,,,,‘ it.., . .''' . . 111!f:i."; '' . • ' ''' ' ''ILI"'. ' ' it 11 ' '''1''i, rVI 4 ,; i, ,.. ,• ''''' . I.,. til., . 4 ' ' ,..tt ' • • A •./ , ., . i ' , r--.."`"Yt.;:iit:.".7.:,.-..-.•.',1.40,,,,".....,,- ,. . a' . .),i; r/14e :(1 '( '. ••• • .,::::„ : l,A . , .:'••, ' i (1 I 1. .1u1i.f,4i!'••!.;•-;.:7•-,-.,f.,' !,,t.:.-,', - ' i'L' 1. ,;:t,,,','.,•2't,i1 f `;', ':';1 ; . , • ••..t.,.V,>••,, 4; -.,,... IA (41 . . •- c".;,•.,.."1."41h-1,/' ,,,, i....t,,,,,,'...., ' .$'i,`• ,",.,t,, .4p..,/.,,,f;,,,L-,- '•',+,,4:4,,.',i,:,' •, . • 1 1 ,, UP4.--,,A:;••,.. •.4'„,i.),,,,-,,,,,.-,,,,.,. - ',- ':... ' .1, 44 f, Iff.lil , . ---4.....1 -.-..• ,,: l'-' ..e*,:.1,,,„, ',;!:,..J,,,,, ".',,q, I . . ‘4,..-v ,, , I,. , . . k.''''''.'-''Sr':‘, •'A:7;:'.••,:•''•),,Y11,''.4.%;..I. -.,'.'' ' :'''''''''' ''34•:;',''''4:,,..,,r,,•;,,1.•, .• , •. fik...'r ... . . 1'1'4' 1 ''.. 'I- " T ".•,-.‘=;-..--/,-,,' - `.,,,N,C,J;L. ,,..,•:,! , iVi•4 i )r,, /. .. 0, . . 1 'r ., •1'.1,1, ....i4.$110/1%.4q:.f, , -'.i."i;.";:t.:',,,,`111.;',;,v;,:,t,,„'.:;,!..','..,,,, '4,1.4 ‘.1,. ,i,.1,, t,.1,1,„,i•' I... ,,..,..-:,..‘ ,_,,..„..c•,,,,,,,,,,..-..,,,i7.-,:.. ,,,,:,e,;.1,.::14,:vii,..,,::,,,..:1.....,,E„:,‘,:,,,,.., . , 4.' „.I,' , 11,1:t • qif•••• Ck ip' . 'ti, '.' i,htit'i:41.s•.,flo,' I :it- • '',If•• ,Vir...•••,.•;,' .. ' • V• i..,.::,,,,1,,'. *iiii-131,1'i I;1•;I."iy,.i,',.",:,,,',;,e:I'.,,':,..,)r I.1 ,,-. . .,',•',','',.,4k,-),.,,;',4,i.4y,.',-'.;•m,'!.')-!.:'..,:,•:',.,„,,:'',.%r',.',,r ..., - 1.;,•.,,1'h,.i 1' ' t ,I-• /'. ,.,.7...'.,,'., , • ,\,.•:----:- .,. '..;',..,;,-, .,..e1..5:,,,i..,,,.''''.'„. ' . . :,, , ,..,,,y:v.'; ',".,,.,',•-', .., ' ..,...-- 1; ,v, •,'.4 q'I ;iii,.',..',,.', 1- -, __ it ',:.."1,it!',1,.',?",.,ii ,c,o,",, ' , .I., -,' • ..1.'1,7.-,, 4,...tiv, ,,,,.>.t....,-,....•.,.,, „ t ..)1: .i ,. . . ••`.,.,,,,•';ftii:,',1.:',••.,„• ' ,•,,,,,,,,tt!„, ,,,.•.'.' :,-:ol."4•-•,. . t ,..., 7.A i'1,.','.,,.., ':,. A : c‘., C . 11 .1.1 l' 1 ;.,,.' I . .:;',itit. "-1).,.•, . , • '‘.°,1 . ' s .t1).11M,i1•,!',,It',. .:,'' , . t'it i I„ II .11/tife.,,,,,,, ,, ”. ,),,,,,ik,i•..,_,,,',,r',4,,.''''‘'','''ii,, 'I 6 t:1 ; , ...f ,:.•?!tlig-' A'''',.' ' ' ')%•,,,i. kJ... I,•••., ! i ! . • Y-I't 41, 1,;, Y;( 1,•• ''''-`-'-'.!'t•:',',;''.',,i'„,,. ',I: re,' ),,' Irt Ir,ii;r ,'1;,:.:,,• , . ••,.,„4.•!,1-,,.,,,,,,•••.... . . , ,• T. :14 .''.N..,t ,",•,,,... ‘i I. ri.i ',Fil.....i,y,.: ',,, : '',";;;;,.:. .,„.,N,..4,?'.,j‘c •k , • ,. •'t •.,•,...• . 4411 s li it 1 ' .f.2.,,,,„ti..$•.',4,••,Y,,i,,,,,,,:",., ;T .,A..t .••-• •Jk.4, ,•4',;J,Jpi.l... ;I I i•'l'•z. .'•,;;1•1!tk'-'fltiL?'.• . -•,'?L'Y'4;1',",t;,,.., ••.••••• 4./ ; t .'•"1/. ,t, ..,.•:i.4.f.•:.-b.i., ,i.iri• kl) '7 4 I , .., 't,i .:'..`"j•,'.."....-,...- , '.:' '' ''''1 tri irt ''' ' : 17 ... L.1.,93,4` • :..1,1:,•,,,,.,, .,i -C C ,—, - ,, '-`:',il'i ,.:..k!'i.,'' ',' - 14 , J4...u.l.a10,•••§., e;. rrl ''' ,......,'.'" •-. ‘1,, ...i. 0,t.iltli ,'' fl t',1;•,9, ''.. ), i -•,,,''",','Rt,:".4 . i , '..40 P - , k .1 P r.',11, ',. ; ' ',I,,,:,..,,b, ..:.3.t.' .,1'. •-.1.- x 1 , .,"<,•Ai•ikl.','1:',.-:::,',:. , ',.,,t;.ff ("f,4,(l'fit '4;'.t.,•• ',., ,,,,,,..,,,,,,,N,, ,..",, . .• 1.1 LI----, ill,-....., .. .. ._;. :....,.,• Itt ) ;..,7:1,,,,,r4:irof ,,t, ,.., n ili4-., , , --•.. . . .,.':::iii.1,:i7.1?,,,,,,,t,,::::::,,,,,,,:..,,:i,. , , .‘,,*.)•., .. - (i) ..t ci ...' - .,=----. • . - .' ,.,kh'','„'.:;=1,',•' • ":74'.1,4.fr'!,';•' ti '' -.`' M Ci ti..,..4,': --- 1 • './,;(1, ,p1 ';, i., . of,I.,,,, ' ' #'' ' Y 'i 't, ;Ilff . ..,' ,,;.,„....,_'.,,,,,,r,' ii: rri --. ,-ri f:...?,1, . .... ',1'...`,L;!4 ).6,',' : . • I,'; :,. , ,i .r.,:., ,,,''.;.,',,;.,,Li,' ... ,2 '1:1 'T'';,,,, ''• !':'),F,,''ir,•r•,4.1"lif,..':••• :.- • ,.'. . .. i.i ..1 i't '' 1 ...,d.i...41t •, L-..] P:i , '4•14 • .."•;.",•;'•• • • , , , '1'...0'. ; • CO tli 0 cs.-r•••••• :•".1T-',,'•i,..,:f-',.••.' ',• ., •• -11 IP 1, ,,.. At'ilt:/„• • , , ,....0•1?; , , , . . , ..t., / 1, ., ,f,f,1(1.,. .".„ i e ..!4 . r,,•1, 3 .:'-'7• :1 .,.•:,.i!',-..„••• I. . p i . ''., •:' - ..,:„.... '.''VIP,t,t.'• -• IA 11 it's: til „, ......, . ,. ,. ..,,...is..1,,,,. .,,.,,:,.,,4.._ , 0 ,< p:J. 4 ,....,-•.! . ,•.,:.,,,,,,,ti,„, . . ,..i.,.4,,,,,,;, • , . I ti i, ,. :'''.:;•;'''14' ,. ;,./ 0-1 i 1 4.'-:'-: ,., , . . . 1iii ,,,. ,• ,,,, ,., ', , .t 1 ,',),';•,'." - ii ) i ,, ). ,t,I, . ., ,-,,E; ., . ••••;,, ..':.,4 P',1•,-,w Ity i' .', ','' . a. 11 I I' i 1 i)ti )•'4 1H1 1' ‘,$ 11 ' ' ' ..-;,xr.t., , -;', '..,'''iLk,,', •.,.,A.,r ,.) 0 011 I •tiosi'—', (4 rri 'o',V.'; in'Z',.:',''.'... • ,\ 1 /!'I 1,1 ii . ',1.•,';.i,P' . , 1 2,j. ....,:..... i 1 1Y't( ' . 1 '1 ' I i , '0:4141 I l' ' , ..,.,::;Alt rTh I, •- ,. .. t.• r---- .....,,,-j,;:fL„•,,,,':,:::, I ', ' 1 t .,..,,,.t. ,,,if:,„,,.:s.,,, I ! '''''''' '•,., !ft'' ' I• , ''.j. 's'i ' ,''.kl';:. .Nt•.,':'::•.. , ' ...p,o,f,r, .., .1',.,:,i,,,4 .- n l' ' ....,ix,r,o,..i..,•-••.,,• , : • • T ' 3' 1 161 . ....;.!1,'.,.4,•, ')1',,,,'*,,i- :. ,,' , ;ri r ' •. .k,•1 '' t • .. -.'i.•01*',T.4:,','-00;,,,-,,,,,,.; ,.,.. ',:.,, .- ' !,,,)",:j4.1','4:*•';'•'..11 ' . V• ot I . • l' . / . •, .J-,,,.,,:;.(.4,1,..4;••••",,',.•f•',4.••'''''• i...' ' '. • •.•• .. •'.•. • ' •••,.•...•••.• • • • . . •. . . -• • . • . .. ,. t'•- 1.• , ,,,.. ',IN0,1',1",•,•0 ti'• • ' ;,;:,'..,4171•14 4 ', ,(i,/ 1,..,/, • ,i t,,, .,'• 1.... , • k•$. ''•.• t t `L 4‘ '' Ili i ,1,1 ,,,, • -At, •.!,, ,:,• • .,,, . , . ,,, li ,,•,,: 14 • • , , r. , 1 , ,, i,,..! „ 0 , ,, I_ . i,'•\ • •. • ', , , , ‘, \ :A",, ,. ,, ,,,, ,),.. Al,1, r ,1 . , ,. • . ...,,, . i „,„ ,,, ,,, i • ., ,,,.• ... .. , . , . , „ .,•.........- .• t,' i '))1k, ,• , i).•:- r',.,••, .0 .,1 „ ,1 .-,...-.. ..„ ( •,' ,,;, Ilit,',' ',.; ..'r ‘," ,I, . :,, ., ., . , , , . • ., i • ,. .• .,\,. , • .2 )...,1.1 r r --....,,, t, [,,,,,,,,.„,), ,, • ,,,....,..• ., , „,.,,;14,.., •.,..,„4„,.., I qr 1..,..,! '''; • t.'it ,i ' V,-,',...".tifj. "4., '' ,• 1/. 11,1,1) ,i :.. ' -.fi•Iiii; , .'._ -,-17-;,*..•,,,.:,,,.7.,,,,-, i- .. , , I. • ; .. .•,• ,.. , , • .-,,___ ....,..,....... ...,, i1,.. , , '.1 t ,,, • I:. ,; ,....1 ,r4s ,I, • ",r,..z -,... , .•,4'. ' , \ • ....;-4,,: , ,:, . ,• .-,,, iii;', r i, .,,.. ,Ir:f.---,....,-,:, --..,.-.. .•.,.- ',',' ,, ; •,r".1, 1,- ‘,1 t, . . ,,,rt..,,,s._ , .-.,:g.•;,.•,,, , .. 10 I , 1 .. ,.,1,1 ' ' 'i,,i*r... . I' •'. ''''144Y;J• (.., I , , . ..,kp s,, 1.,, ...sr j,,„ ..,, ',,d, IV.4...'' ' . •i '..2, ,..,-4•11V.:-.:-.' ;' •k , 4-,0,0 .‘ . 5- 'rt•,;1 t, 1 . I 1 , . I. ...14.,,I,s i •. ., 'i• i:110,, .0 ; ,'•; '*.li,I'C.'1'1h.•:ii , '"• tiyzcZ, -I, I .' .i..N41, ',. I ';*:),\'1'',11'1,';‘;.?"i.y:1''' ,' .11,•!..'''''?.t;,'"'""''''''' • i,' ft. , 1, ,i I . ' ' / - '1,1',/,ri.)" , . ' "' ' 1,./' , •0 A 4 144 , .•,:o 'vac.- v,. . ,-zi ;.! ,,,i,.. . ,••:•,-,....,,....,i, ..„ li ›. ,fii, h• , il • 1 i 141 i•1 'f!, ' ,„,r r.43,„. ..„....17,,t, - o''',' PV; 1'V.!. ,... „ ' " (-, . • ;:• •;':r -.;-z. • ' 't ,t.,,,,t,' b• ',0 I •- . i i ! - • „.r'1..--4-r- ,......41 • —.1;:-..... i'cll. ' ! .17 , --- 0 ' 4 I 0,k', , joi . c:) ; , .,. .0 ,,ti , ;- ,1 i, , ).-.. ' ' 1 . --,.....- ......, se , ? , \ ' 1 I , '•• i 1 • . '..., 1... 1 . , I • I .', rri ,... . 11, ... ,•.,I.,' ! I , ''' '`•' T.4.I " . ...I.-;;1 E. ,1 , tV,kx,.',1:,,t• t, 11:kf;:', , ,, 1 I , i' ' i,Y.,..,..cor 1.•/: . ' t, . . 1,'•I. r . , f . .\ i • , n ..-,',•:.,::.-. ', ,, .:., . • " , • --i .1 i tzf• iti,' f4;:'...t-.,:'..?-.1,',..Atr'..,,i.b.'1•44'iti ;,..:JO., ..,A)..-, ,;•.. . ..;;6,: -V'61V)*,, i. , 4 I) 1\ 0 f i • ' 1 ' t7r4T:ri'''..,Ir.''Y.;r'e;',, ;,;',;i'„„c,:,..„11,7,0 ,„:•,'A • , , , ,1, , ,1,r• k,f,}0,4,,f.Y v.' , .P. '.' t,1*^2... 'i'4' •e ,,,, •', 4,.'vr,O,ip,hvy-t•k'41,,N,r,,- • ' '`lf l'''''''cf,' , , ,.. ..;)....,.••",r,0*,%' ,,iii Y.,A,V r,o,. .. :4 . . . 1 , , .,.,,, .q 4i,t.'',,,th '4,fi ' .i., i - "r!,';.'s.' !,•;,;'.,,, ,',,',.',i-,),,,t,'.,.....' ,,,,,..'r•,.',,,d:'-'.''',,. ': . • ..1 i 1 1 ....:.-.1.1,'!•,•!;;.,,,,..,:.2„'it,??.7,41,';4;4',414,7rrs4',='I'',"' . ' ,n k • i ,......'-',.;..k.';'.1.7'r. ' 11; I •!, ..7.,,,,,,, " ',,,:t';''',",,:,..,,-:; ‘, • ',' .1,34(7'...X.I.•,,:e••••• i i , • ,.. ' '''Plik:7;',.!.•;:, ' I , I, ' ' ' I ...I '•:-:‘"' ' ........,:mr,:4„:".';`:;... ...... ....-.... ' I ;we/;t• • . „••;:)?:;• .il.'‘;‘:;')'' )1 ' „.. . ., . ' I . :-"I'f•• !,"N.- 1 . . '‘Ik);.-*:•:',,,.:‘,'4•.!!";*:,:5;tiv"fill.‘. ii' ‘,.%,( • .I I '. '.•'' 1 . i':,,,.,‘.:."'1.11'kikf?I'P. '.1 i '1 4 .. • • .1 • i;.. 1 ' !I'4!";!** 4, e.:. w.,t i . y 1 _ • : .. . -„,, .. .,".,..,tlf . —•1 1• ' ) sk 1.5 0',..eit 4?'', \‘ •' .1 " ' 1' la. 4 .'' "•' ' cliol l'. .• , ',', ,11 . ., :ek,- .i 7..•r,"! . k•')(. t.4.,. ,,ti.'r• ., qr.fi.s.411„4„4,,s..,, U ' i • n • ,) 1, iv ° ' ....-:—'-•. : , •....f...:_ :i.'f _ '..1j.\• 1,',; I. - .., u ;IA :.,. • 1.42!;.:(1,,it41,:,;••,'',. I i. ''', .,,',!,,, 'ip4.lkis.,.1,:,...1,.V.•:',. II, . . —.. . 1 rflI ' . , ,..,., ,1 ? i,11...„ . . •' I• '' ' , • ' , 14'1 (t)' • 94.4„,,, 1,•41 :0,4..,,,„(or,/,,...,„ .1(;,—,' $. , (--,,t A • g t. l• ..-_,s_ o..,' —4. I ' ...-..,4....,5:::,.:ii.,c,V.44.K.;,'•4;ii.,..:{.3%),,,,,.',S)::::,,. 6 \. 1 E3 , . . ... ..... .,.._ '-•..4'11-;.',.-;I ",‘ ..44/..,,,!..:::':•„/... . - r• 11' ' . i :0 . 1'tali .e. I ril 1 4c, i .•'0;4".`lit/4,e.„4• ',, I 11 I .A .&, ' ' ,tt#P.0.:,,•I.I.1...i...'. .` .4.ii 'k , I H 414: k• ''.?..el.:,',.••ii.i,',,`;', ',, • ' i,0 I A , . ,..., , .. ,,:, ,, '„..,„ ._„ ,•;17k,q!i y•,... ,..;- ,. '.4., _ ,t I 1,4,:,41:1,4.:,!X • i'ljA;r'',Itgo ,, ',•..- •, ,, ,' i'r,,,' , 1 = „,...1' . ( li.,••;-t.iiii4,,V,'44 k'f',..,': 1.1'40i,i' 1,'',': t..\ 1 , ,, , i .);.±•,,,?.••.•,,ii,,•,;,!„k,p.,w,e4 .i,,,i,i),,,ff...,,1 ,1,, ',,,-,:i.a •,, ,, .t,(ri.,,,,,‘t..t• ;:•," ,,•.,,,.1.,• • r '.. (roi• *cs. 1,,`,?::,)). . I.'-_,,...-±.. :±,..,:_.-.:.-,fif,„-,__„_-,_ iii r•ir.,r' ,V''.",?tt:N.r.,-''.1'4.1,,, t ' liii',":..,.•''1'"',' •,. 9 ?;,, ' ,. ,,tre,,.. , . 1 , \ I .;e• •,,Pti 5,I, 'II . ',,''J ', ''.'4.„' . 1' ., ...''','.''''•I'''';','1. ,..o, i.. 1,ii,. klIVIS ', . f i..- " • 4. • • , . 1,. . ,. •.,. ,,•,. :... tY.-,,,,,,irty' 1 ' ,-;$ •p•,." 1 i• . ".',..--- I . , . , „,,, „i,., ,•,, •''' '1‘. ' k t i 1 . I 11 ,I, , . • I 0' . . 4''-''e, • ,'',•;0' i i ' 'ih' i h........, '....-,,l;'•:2, '',.?;,' ,,ilt.4ifit,,,41111.„.:e,,,..., I;r344,..,. ..‘4::!,,:t,:,., i: . 1. li, ., .:$11.1:1; ' lilL I • ,, . mg 4'''''4'....e.::'e ' ,li''A, ly., :,,, • ., , . .,. , i i, ,, , .','+ ' ,' , . 1 1' '' "."..'.1,,,.4,,,‘,..A....!;v A) +.A., ‘'. 1,, ' • il..; mmicl A. „ . .,.. •i .,i, s 1 J t 1 . \' 1 VA I . • 124:::i't,k1. 1 111111\\III\1\IN, \ i illit*: t 15,', „ S ,ii{l1, 1 r% ii age �fa-C J S" ri1�' wvr ' s'f, t't ,1'.:'1�Ifwa six S J 1� "; Irl '}q ,, f q -- ,r, f yell �;: �I• 'j ���; I 1 (k,,�l� \\ \ \1 I I� 1'I , r,=j°• 111�I� I ��1! u r , , I CSI 1 'I t « • rr' 1 i. oar+ -I O0; .. �Meve a++w,,.7. � i\' 1 ro 4/ r j I F � ONil I}" ..Xr .. ; O 1 ie w_ """*"r fm f — I • 11 • Fmk'° . 'i'1 fr i , 1 1101.--tiii _... 1., , ' i, 1 1,," 11 . r , lig I . 1 { � l: * 11, i s, �i �4ll ON °r = "" � 'i �' ��1 I �' ' t� =____.--- ..=t4..._-' • O fi r'; , Sf 1 = (.=/) 1a .:. { ,• \'� 'I ; i eft . It � , 1 }� I t 11 r ^ r \ . If ' t, i 41 11111"7" I. lit 4S- I �,'R�S,v ? ' , . Fts T i, ae r �` i � Y TItpMyyg Yiy1fiFl } `I —.__. . .- • •1 AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 7b Name: Gerald Henricks C'?(- 7-1-] 2Y) Department: HRA Date: March 8, 1995 Meeting Date: March 20, 1995 Category: Petitions, Requests and Communications Subject: Farmington New Home Program Explanation: The Farmington HRA would like the City Council to request a modification to the Farmington NPw Nowa Program from the Dakota County HRA Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo - Jerry Henricks Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson Administration Jerry Henricks HRA . D �G�CL %/-� Signature Memo To: Mayor and City Council Subject: Farmington New Home Program Date: March 15,1995 The Farmington Housing and Redevelopment Authority at their February 27,1995 meeting requested that the City Council be asked to modify the Farmington New Home Program. The Farmington New Home Program was established in 1993 for the purpose of encouraging the construction of new housing to replace homes that were in substandard conditions. Funding for this program is supplied from a 1983 Tax Increment housing project and a small cities block grant. This New Home Program Administrative Agreement with its program amendments allow for either party to request modifications to this program under section XII(attached). The HRA Board had reviewed the possible future uses for the"Hardee's Block" determining that the best use for the area would be commercial. The logic behind this determination is that the entire block north of Elm Street is commercial and the entire block south of Oak Street is proposed by Pete Chown to be use by Lampert Lumber for future retail expansion. Lampert Lumber is presently negotiating the acquisition of the parcel of land west of their new storage area. The HRA Board feels these funds could be used for the purpose of acquiring the • McCann property in an effort to start the process of preparing the Hardee's Block for commercial use. In discussion with Lee Smith,Dakota County HRA representative, it is unlikely that the Dakota County HRA staff will support this request without the City having a definite project for the site. They have a concern that the site will be used for commercial use while the New Home Program is for housing activities. The City Council should determine if they wish to proceed with the requested modification of the New Home program. If the Council wishes to proceed with the modification request, a motion should be passed to that effect. If the Council determines they wish not to proceed, it should return the request to the HRA stating they deny the request. If there are any questions, please feel free to contact me. "dc.42.14e W—et,2-celd) Gerald A. Henricks HRA Executive Director cc: HRA file Memo To: HRA members Subject: McCann Property Purchase Date: February 24,1995 At the I-IRA February 13,1995 meeting, the Board had directed me to pursue the acquisition of the McCann property using the Farmington New Home Program funds for the acquisition. This was contingent upon Dakota County HRA releasing their rights to the four vacant lots south of Hardee's. The option release has been signed by the Dakota County HRA Executive Director and the Farmington HRA Director. -Mr. and Mrs. McCann have agreed to a sale price of$95,000 for the house and $7,000 for •relocation expenses. This acquisition is contingent upon the Farmington HRA using the Farmington New Home Program funds for the acquisition. In discussion with Dakota County HRA as to the availability of the New Home funds, I was informed that Dakota County HRA did not feel the use of the New Home funds would be appropriate in acquiring the McCann property. The New Home Program Administrative Agreement, Section XII, Program Amendments, either party of the agreement reserve the right to amend the agreement(copy attached). The questions I request the Board to resolve are as follows: 1. What exactly does the Board anticipate the use for the one block area would be: east of 1st Street west of the Soo Line north of Oak Street south of Elm Street. With the construction of the City Center north of Elm Street and the construction of Dr. Harms dental office, it appears this one block area would be suited for commercial use. Would the Board suggest providing two lots south of Hardee's to IIardee's. This would allow the traffic to enter IIardee's from Elm Street and the carryout/pickup window traffic to exit onto Oak Street instead of Elm Street. 2. Does the Board wish to begin the process of clearing the area for a future project? This would be the same method used by the HRA in the preparation of the City Center project. Another example of being prepared for the need is the Industrial Park. Upon completing the infrastructure, businesses began to look at locating in Farmington. I feel that the Board, if they have a plan for the one block area, should consider preparing the site for that activity. 3. Does the Board want to acquire the McCann property using the Farmington New Home Funds? If they were to acquire the property, the Board could consider moving the house to a new location selling it to a homeowner. The purchase price could be either returned to the New Home program or used to acquire additional houses in the area where the owner agrees to waive their relocation assistance. If the Board wants to use the New Home Program for the acquisition, the Board will need to request the City Council to request an amendment to the New Home Program I Administrative Agreement under Section XII: Program Amendment(note the attachment). I would appreciate direction from the HRA Board on these issues. If there are any questions, please feel free to contact me. ..ede-,--/-1-0M- -Gerald A. Henricks ' HRA Executive Director cc: HRA File 4 . Existing trees shall be preserved when possible. Care shall be taken to preserve existing root systems. A tree wrap, with board reinforcement shall be used on trees directly adjacent to active grading and construction areas. 5. The construction site, neighboring property and adjacent public streets shall be kept free of construction debris at all times. 6. All air conditioning units must be located in the rear yard of the house. 7. Egress window area well foundations must meet side setback requirements (minimum of 6' from the property line) , or be located in the rear yard of the house. • 8. No construction workers, construction equipment or construction materials shall enter neighboring properties. B: Building Standards 1. Three and four bedroom homes are preferred. However, a minimum of two finished bedrooms and easily finished space for a third bedroom will be acceptable. 2. Two full bathrooms are preferred. However, a minimum of one full bath and a 1/2 bath roughed-in will be acceptable. 3. A two car garage, attached or detached, is preferred. However, a one car garage may be acceptable in cases where setback requirements will not permit a two car garage. 4. Exterior materials (siding, soffit, doors and windows) , shall be low maintenance. Aluminum, vinyl, and steel are preferred. Natural cedar lap is acceptable if properly stained or painted. Hardboard panels or hardboard lap siding may be acceptable in some instances. 5. Unit height and mass of the new homes shall be compatible with the scale of the surrounding neighborhood. 6. Plans must present a balanced and pleasing distribution of wall and window areas from all views. 7. A full basement is preferred to be provided in the house unless the selected design results in a split level/garden level type of basement. C. The HRA will review all proposed plans in accordance with the standards herein. Plans meeting said standards will be recommended for consideration by the Farmington City Council. D. The Farmington City Council, or a designated representative, will review proposed plans for adherence to all standards set forth in this section. Council approval must be obtained before the HRA will transfer ownership of the property to the purchaser. • SECTION XII: Program Amendments The City of Farmington and the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority reserve the right to amend or terminate this program at any time, except that changes or termination shall not adversely affect any persons with respect to official documents approving participation in the program which were executed prior to the effective date of such amendment or termination. ri7r AGENDA REQUEST FORM qeL. Item No. Name: Daniel M . Siebenaler I Department: Police 03-)LDate: March 8, 1995 L,I Meeting Date: March 20 , 1995 Category: Unfinished Business Subject: COPS FAST Grant Explanation: Request acceptance of Grant and Authority to begin hiring process Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson City Administrator Wayne Henneke Finance Director ")." s 41441110 Signature V MEMO TO: Mayor and Council SUBJECT: Federal Grant for Hiring Police Officer DATE: March 7, 1995 As you know the City of Farmington has been awarded a COPS FAST Grant by the Department of Justice. This grant was approved toward the hiring of a Police Liaison Officer who will work full time in the school system. We will receive a total of $75, 000 . over a three year period to fund that position. At this time, I have submitted the final budget document to the Justice Department and have been told we will be able to have the first year payment as soon as that document has been reviewed. I anticipate availability of grant funds on or before April 1, 1995 . As you can see in the attached budget document, local cost in the first year is $7771 . 75 . The grant will fund $32, 000 . in salary and benefit . The grant requires diminishing use of grant money and increasing local share . The second year the grant share is $25, 000 and the local share is $18, 682 . 55 . In the third year, the grant share is $18, 000 . and the local share is $30, 712 . 59 . These numbers are estimates of salary and benefit based on recent trends and labor contracts . According to the original grant application as approved by resolution of the City Council and the School Board, the local share in the first and second year will be divided equally. That translates to a first year cost of $3, 886 . 00 to each the City and the School District . In the second year, that cost to each would be $9, 342 . 00 . In the third year the distribution of cost would be directly proportionate to the amount of use on a percentage basis . I believe that the hiring of a full time school liaison will be a valuable addition to the City and School District . The minimal financial exposure for the first two years will give us ample opportunity to evaluate it' s effectiveness . At this time, I am requesting the City accept the Justice Department Grant as outlined and authorize initiation of the hiring process contingent on receipt of the grant money. It is necessary to start this process now in order to meet timelines for the hiring and training of a new officer prior to the scheduled start of the liaison position in mid-August . Memo to: Mayor and Council March 7, 1995 Page 2 If all proceeds on schedule, I anticipate a start date of May 1, 1995, for the new officer. In the meantime it is necessary to conduct interviews, background checks and psychological evaluations to have a hiring recommendation to the City Council by the second meeting in April . As always, if you have any comments or questions, feel free to contact me at your convenience. C72:213 Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police DMS/m cc : Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke Pat Hanauer _ cue No. Pe MIV01 gO2F Farmington Police Department s K., \4, A` '6 U.S. Department of Justice ,� ,; Ofce of Community Oriented Policing Services COPS FAST: Community Policing Information As described in the COPS FAST Fact Sheet,prior to receiving your COPS FAST hiring grant funds,you need to fill out the following form which provides information about your community policing goals and the activities of the new officers you plan to hire with your grant funds. The COPS Office will work with you towards meeting these goals. In addition,you will need to complete the attached Budget Worksheets for a financial review. Questions 6 must be typewritten. Assistance in completing this information is available from the Depart- ment of Justice Response Center at 1-800-421-6770,or by writing the COPS Office,P.O.Box 14440, Washington,DC 20044. You may add additional information concerning your plans by attaching type- written materials at the end of this form. The following information will help the COPS Office understand the public safety problems facing your community. 1. Please rank in descending order the following public safety issues your community faces. Rank only those public safety issues that concern your community. For example,if weapons are the greatest threat to public safety in your community,put the letter"f"in rank number one. Rank: Major Public Safety Issues: 1. I a. Violent crimes against persons 2. A b. Property crimes 3. — c. Motor vehicle thefts 4. b d. Vandalism 5. f e. Gangs 6. k f. Weapons 7._.A._ g. Prostitution 8. a h. Drug crimes 9. / i. Domestic violence 10. c-- j. Alcohol related crime,including DWI 11. = k. Disorderly conduct 12. o I. Traffic violations 13. n m. Agricultural crimes 14._ __ n. Wildlife crimes 15. o. Hate crimes p. Other(specify) Page 1 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated at 433 hours per response,including the time for reviewing instructions.searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspects of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden to the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.U.S.Department of Justice,1110 Vermont Ave., NW. Washington.DC 20530. r MNO19OZF Farmington Police Department Communities: 3. Please indicate which of the following groups you have worked with or consulted with to develop partnerships to combat crime in your community: Consulted Plan to Consult ❑ ❑ a. Other government agencies(eg., probation office,sanitation) O ❑ b. Civic groups ❑ c. Neighborhood associations ❑ ❑ d. Tenants'associations ❑ e. Organizations of your employees, including collective bargaining groups ❑ f. Business groups c 1.0."L or ❑ g. Religious groups P,/;�Q a�,/0.; (2.,.- ; i O h. Schools ❑ O i. Other(specify) Citizens: 4. Please indicate which of the following partnership activities are currently performed by citizens in your jurisdiction,or are planned under your COPS FAST grant Currently Planned Under • Perform COPS FAST Grant ❑ a. Neighborhood watch 'g ❑ b. Volunteering with your law enforcement agency O f� c. Citizen advisory groups to your law enforcement agency ❑ ❑ d. Citizen patrols within your community3C ❑ e. Participate in anti-drug or anti-violence programs ❑ f. Other activities (specify) Ci,aPla;.,$ i°..0j -A.-1 Patrol Officers: 5. Please indicate which of the following activities are currently performed by patrol officers,or which are planned under your COPS FAST grant: a) Crime Prevention Activities: Currently Planned Under Perform COPS FAST Grant ❑ ❑ a. Foot patrol,bike patrol or mounted patrol Q Q b. Making door-to-door contacts with citizens and businesses ❑ c. Meeting with community leaders and groups to explain crime prevention techniques a O d. Using business cards,cellular phones or beepers to maintain contact r with,and be contacted by,citizens regarding public safety concerns ( ex 1' e. Working in schools or other public agencies to teach crime prevention ❑ ❑ f. Other(specify) page 3 • MNO1902F Farmington Police Department � ,, gra 0 U.S. Department of Justice ', = -.'; Office of Community Oriented Policing Services COPS FAST: Budget Information As described in the COPS FAST Fact Sheet,prior to receiving your COPS FAST hiring grant funds,you need to provide information about your budgetary plans. The worksheet below and on the back will assist you in properly organizing and estimating your costs and providing the necessary details for financial review. In addition,you will need to complete the attached Community Policing Information. Complete one worksheet for each officer that you plan to hire. These figures will be used to calculate the final grant amount,which may be more or less than the estimated grant amount. Assistance in completing this informa- tion is available from the Department of Justice Response Center at 1-800-421-6770,or by writing the COPS Office,P.O.Box 14440,Washington,DC 20044. 1. OFFICER(S)TO BE HIRED 3. TOTAL COSTS FOR THREE YEARS: This worksheet describes the cost for First Year's Salary+Fringe(a+b) $39,771 .75 (line c) (check one of the following]: XOne new entry level full time officer Second Year's Increase" $ 3,312.00 (line d) O One rehired former officer O One lateral transfer Second Year's Salary+Fringe(c+d) $43,682.55 (line e) O One part time officer. The average number of hours per . week the part time officer will work is Third Year's Increase" • $ 4,259.00 pine f) Third Year's Salary+Fringe(e+f) $48,712.59 (line g) 2. COST PER OFFICER Total Costs for Three Years(c+e+g) . $ 132.166.89 (line h) Current Annual Base Salary: $ 31 ,679.00 (line a) "Year 2 and Year 3 increases may:,duds step raises and coat of wing adiustments. You may desaib'how these were calculated in the Budget Summary on the other side of this worksheet. Annual Fringe Benefits: FICA 1 .45 $ 459.34 4. LOCAL AND FEDERAL SHARES: Social Security $ -- -- 132 166.89 Health Insurance 193.50/mo $ 2.322.00 Total Costs for Three Years(line h): $ 3.60/�mo 43.20 Percentage of Total Costs to be paid Life Insurance $ by you: 43.25%(line i) Vacation $ (This is the percentage of your local match. It must be at least 25%of the total costs for three years.) Sick Leave $ Percentage of Total Costs to be paid Retirement 11 .47 $ 3,611 .40 by the COPS Office:. 56.75 %(line j) Workmen's Compensation5.2374 1 ,656.81 (This is the percentage of the federal share. It may be Unemployment Insurance $ no more than 75%of the total costs for three years.) • Line j multiplied by Line h: $ 75,000.00 (line k) Other' $ .Fnnge benefits other than Mose listed must be specified n..other. Amount on Line k or"$75,000,"whichever TAe costs of equipment,training,uniforms,vehicles and overtime is the lesser amount: ' $ 75,000.00 (line I) are not permitted. Total Annual Fringe Benefits: $ 8,092.75 (line b) peg.3 f• U. S. Department of Justice COPS FAST EEOP CERTIFICATION If your agency has 50 or more employees, you must maintain an Equal Employment Opportunity Program on file and complete certification A: A. I, Daniel M. Siebenaler [agency executive officer], certify that the City of Farmington [agency] has formulated an Equal Employment Opportunity Program ("EEOP") in accordance with 28 CFR 42.301 et seq., subpart E, that it has been signed into effect by the proper agency authority and disseminated to all employees, and that it is on file in the Office of - - _ [name], 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 [address], for review or audit by officials of the cognizant State planning agency or the Office for Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs as required by relevant laws and re ulations. `- // Yam g2e r4 r'6e C—♦� A� .y.� March 1995 [signature] [date] If your agency has fewer than 50 employees, please complete certification B: y7 �'. ployee-s B. I hereby certify that the funded agency has fewer than 50 employees and therefore is not required to maintain an Equal Employment Opportunity Program, pursuant to 28 CFR 42.301 et seq. . /. March 6 , 19 95 [signature] [date] MN01902F Farmington Police Department AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 9b Name: Tom Kaldunski Public Works r� v n� Department: Date: March 10, 1995 c, Sjr 2 / Meeting Date: March 20, 1995 Category: Unfinished Business Subject: Discuss Corps of Engineer Response to Flood Study Request Explanation: Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo - Tom Kaldunski Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson Administration Department Heads .A� Signature MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: CORPS OF ENGINEERS FLOOD STUDY ON VERMILLION RIVER DATE: MARCH 20, 1995 Attached you will find correspondence I received from the Corps of Engineers regarding the requests for a Flood Study on the Vermillion River. The City and the Vermillion River Watershed Management Board had passed Resolutions requesting the Corps of Engineers do this study. The response indicates that the proposed project is not nationally significant and therefore it is not eligible for Federal Funding unless a local sponsor (i.e., the City and/or the Vermillion River Watershed Management Board) was willing to pay for 75% of the costs. The Council may want to request that the Vermillion River Watershed Management Board become the local sponsor and try to proceed with the project, if the Vermillion River Watershed Management Board ha available. The Council should provide direction on this matter. 14/(11441 Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E. Director or Public Works/City Engineer TJ K/pr cc: file Department Heads Jim Robinette, Vermillion River Watershed Management Board rrn�.Kalicad i March 6, 1995 Management and Evaluation Branch Engineering and Planning Division Mr. Jim Robinette 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 Dear Mr. Robinette: . The Farmington City Council and the Vermillion River Watershed Management Board have requested assistance from the Corps of Engineers with regard to the flooding problems in the Vermillion River basin. The Corps has been granted authority to plan, design and construct small flood damage reduction projects by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended, within certain guidelines and funding limits. Recently, the President submitted a national budget which requires the Corps of Engineers to limit its involvement to flood control projects which are considered to be nationally significant. Nationally significant is defined as those projects which receive more than half of their floodwaters from out of State, meet a benefit-to-cost ratio of 2 to 1, and have a local sponsor willing to pay for 75 percent of the project cost, with the Federal Government paying the remaining 25 percent. In addition, the Continuing Authorities program is being phased out since it deals primarily with small flood control projects of a local nature. Based on the President's policy and budgetary objectives, the Corps has suspended starting any new flood damage reduction studies, including the proposed study of the Vermillion River. We can therefore take no further action on the resolutions requesting Corps of Engineers assistance which you have submitted. We regret that we are unable to assist you at this time, and we will inform you if there are any changes to the policy which might affect this decision. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Tom Crump at (612) 290-5284. Sincerely, /5/Charles E. rist Chief, Management and Evaluation Branch Engineering and Planning Division Copy Furnished: Thomas J. Kaldunski J Director of Public Works City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 9c Name: Tom Kaldunski �"r / Department: Public Works Date: March 7, 1995 A44(2,X0.— faA.,t,oLk L i -94 Ce)454 Meeting Date: March 20 , 1995 Category: Unfinished Business \ 1 Subject: Traffic Study on CSAH 31 between 180th and 187th Streets Explanation: The County has completed the study. Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo — Tom Kaldunski Referred To: (Name) Department Department Heads /f71/01 Signature MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STUDY, C.S.A.H. 31 BETWEEN 180TH ST. AND 187TH ST. DATE: MARCH 20, 1995 Attached you will find the response that the City has received from the Dakota County Highway Department regarding the above-referenced Study. • • The traffic has increased to 11,000 ADT in 1994 (34% above the 1992 data). With the development occurring in the City, the traffic will continue to increase at this type of rate in the near future. The Highway Department has concluded that a multi-way stop would not remedy the situation. Their recommendation for reconstruction of the C.S.A.H. 31 is outlined in the County C.I.P. for 1996. They have also recommended a multi-lane roadway with left turning lanes, center medians, and provisions for a traffic light when warranted. It is my recommendation that the City Council accept this Study and that the City continue to press for these improvements on a timely basis. Recent discussions with the County imply that the construction will not occur in 1996 unless the planning is started now. The County is in the process of hiring a consultant to review environmental impact of the project proposed in 1996 on C.S.A.H. 31. The City should consider the hiring of a consultant for the project and/or request that the City Staff do the work. /Li Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer TJK/pr cc: file Department Heads r .. DAKOTA COUNTY DAVID L.EVERDS, ENGINEER E (612)891-7100 HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 01 a Coo Fax(612)891-7127 4 -----� I 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE,3RD FLOOR APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 55124-8579 �,. ui�eoano;_ % 'yy Y t, J1 V----,,,. March 3, 1995 Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Farmington 325 Oak St. Farmington, MN 55024 Re: Traffic Study, CSAH 31 between 180th St. and 187th St. Dear Tom: As requested by the City last fall, we have performed detailed traffic studies on the referenced roadway. The results of the studies indicate rapid increase in traffic on CSAH 31 within the last couple of years (8,200 ADT in 1992 vs. 11,000 ADT in 1994). This increase in traffic has made conditions at each of the intersections more difficult. The intersection studies, however, indicate that a change in traffic control would not improve traffic operations at the present time. The data supports the need for improving this section of roadway to a multi-lane roadway with left turning lanes. I recommend that this project include center medians to enhance safety. It also appears, according to the traffic data, that traffic signals may be needed in the future at CSAH 31 and Upper 182nd Street. If traffic signals are not justified at the time of the project, provisions including underground electrical conduit should be included in the project. A project to reconstruct CSAH 31 from CSAH 50 to CR 46 in Apple Valley is included in the 5 year Capitol Improvement Program for 1996. Unfortunately, changes to the traffic controls at the present time could make the conditions worse unless accompanied by the recommended roadway reconstruction. Traffic signals must not be installed on these types of roadways unless left-turn lanes are provided. Left turn lanes are necessary to open sight lines around turning vehicles and to provide a safe refuge area for turning vehicles. Multiway stop signs will create very difficult traffic conditions at intersections down stream. A stop sign will break up any natural platooning of vehicles and cause an unending stream of cars without gaps on CSAH 31 making it more difficult for entering vehicles from the cross street during the peak hours. During the non-peak hours stop signs often cause a speed increase away from the stop sign as well as some traffic disregarding the stop sign. Printed on recycled paper.20%post-consumer �� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Thomas Kaldunski Page Two March 3, 1995 The traffic data collected includes hourly traffic volumes for CSAH 31 at 180th St., at Upper 182nd St., at Upper 183rd St., at 185th St., and at 187th St. Accident data was analyzed for the last 3 years. The accident analysis indicates normal rates compared to the Dakota County average. The data indicates that left turn lanes would be the single greatest safety improvement in the area studied. We will continue to monitor changes in traffic conditions which could justify a traffic control change. Please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions or concerns regarding this study and recommendation. Sincerely, APP deter L. Sore son Traffic Engineer PLS/ckj cc: Commissioner Joseph Harris Brandt Richardson Lou Breimhurst David Everds n:Kadunk4 — r AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 9e (2) i Name: Wayne Henneke D Department: Finance t Date: March 10, 1995 j Meeting Date: March 20, 1995 o'/firm 066I Category: Unfinished Business Subject: Adopt Resolution Amending R1-95 - Increase Solid Waste Rate Explanation: Due to new legislation on environmental trust funds that requires all solid waste haulers to establish funds for solid waste disposal. Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo/Resolution - Wayne Henneke Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Tom Kaldunski Public Works Ben Klotz Public Works Jay Kennedy Public Works Lena Larson Public Works WatitULSAMALL-- --., Signature Memo to: Mayor& Council Date : March 15, 1995 Re : Solid Waste User Fee Increase- Environmental Trust Fund Legislation The State has created an Environmental Trust Fund for the cleaning up of landfill sites. The fee established by the legislation is $5.60 for every ton of solid waste taken to an environmentally safe facility. In the City's case,the fee is being collected from the City by Knudtson. To fund this additional fee, it is recommended to increase the solid waste user fees by 3%. It is important the user fee increase is approved tonight. The April 1, 1995 billing is upon us. i)C14/44i2-art.ww241)--Q-- Wayne E. Henneke Finance Director c.c. Larry Thompson, City Administrator Tom Kaldunski, Public Works Director file PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. R AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. R1-95 - FEES AND CHARGES - INCREASING SOLID WASTE RATES - Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 20th day of March, 1995 at 7:00 P.M. . Members Present: Members Absent:. Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, Resolution No. R1-95 established fees and charges for Solid Waste Service in the City of Farmington; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has created an Environmental Trust Fund for cleaning up of landfill sites and has established a fee of $5.60 per ton of solid waste taken to environmentally safe facilities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City of Farmington to fund this additional fee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council amends Resolution No. R1-95 by increasing Solid Waste User Fees by 3% and that this increase become effective with the April 1, 1995 billing quarter. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 20th day of March, 1995. Mayor Attested to the day of March, 1995. SEAL Clerk/Administrator �Zz Minnesota Pollution Control Agency o FM�NaToN Mks ta 0 1995 March 17, 1995 Dear Solid Waste Haulers, Facility Owners, County Officials, and Other Interested Parties: This letter informs you that on March 10,1995, Judge David S. Doty, of the United States District Court, ordered that Minn. Stat. § 115A.47 (the environmentally inferior facility law) is unconstitutional. This decision means that persons who manage waste in an environmentally inferior manner do not have to indemnify generators of the waste. establish and pay into trust funds for response and defense costs, and pay an administrative fee to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Commissioner. Persons who have paid into trust funds since February 1, 1995. may cease trust fund payments and terminate their trust funds. The MPCA staff strongly recommends that persons who passed environmentally inferior facility (EIF) law compliance costs onto their customers reimburse their customers for EIF-related costs and remove all EIF-increased costs from generator's future bills. The MPCA staff appreciate}'our support and cooperation throughout this effort. If you have further questions, please contact Cristine Leavitt of my staff at(612)296-8439. Sincerely. James L. Warner, P.E. Division Manager Ground Water and Solid Waste Division JLW:jp 520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (612) 296-6300 (voice); (612)282-5332 (TTY) Regional Offices: Duluth• Brainerd•Detroit Lakes• Marshall• Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer• Printed on recycled paper containing at least 10%fibers from paper recycled by consumers. Memo to: Mayor and Council Subject: Rice County Landfill Rates Date: March 20, 1995 Per Council directive, I have contacted Rice County regarding their landfill rates. I was informed that the rates are approximately $48.00/ton, which is significantly less than the current rate for approximately $63.00/ton charged at Pine Bend. I was also informed however,that Rice County only accepts waste generated in their county, and therefore, would not be interested in accepting Farmington's solid waste. If so directed, I will make an official request in writing, and the Mayor and I could meet directly with Rice County officials and/or the County Board. I would request direction in this matter. L homp:. ity Admini trator ljt cc: Tom Kaldunski file Minnesota Pollution Control Agency liewompborniar of FApt411146 MAR � o '9 95 March 17, 1995 Dear Solid Waste Haulers, Facility Owners County Officials, and Other Interested Parties: This letter informs you that on March 10,1995, Judge David S. Doty, of the United States District Court, ordered that Minn. Stat. § 115A.47 (the environmentally inferior facility law) is unconstitutional. This decision means that persons who manage waste in an environmentally inferior manner do not have to indemnify generators of the waste, establish and pay into trust funds for response and defense costs, and pay an administrative fee to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Commissioner. Persons who have paid into trust funds since February 1, 1995. may cease trust fund payments and terminate their trust funds. The MPCA staff strongly recommends that persons who passed environmentally inferior facility(EIF) law compliance costs onto their customers reimburse their customers for EIF-related costs and remove all EIF-increased costs from generator's future bills. The MPCA staff appreciate your support and cooperation throughout this effort. If you have further questions, please contact Cristine Leavitt of my staff at(612)296-8439. Sincerely, James L. Warner, P.E. Division Manager Ground Water and Solid Waste Division JLW:jp 520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (612)296-6300(voice); (612) 282-5332(TTY) Regional Offices: Duluth•Brainerd•Detroit Lakes•Marshall•Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer•Printed on recycled paper containing at least 10%fibers from paper recycled by consumers. iv Minnesota Pollution Control Agency CITY OFPA"Mi February 27, 1995 • DAA 2 199 5 al To All Haulers and Persons Who Arrange to Dispose of Solid Waste: This letter notifies you that the Environmentally Inferior Facilities (EIF) Law became effective on February 1, 1995. This law requires ALL solid waste haulers to keep records of their activities, as specified below: "A hauler of solid waste shall keep records at its central record keeping location regarding the date, amount of solid waste by cubic yard or ton, and facility to which each load of solid waste is delivered for disposal by the hauler. The hauler shall keep the records for two years and, when reasonable notice has been given. shall make the records available to the commissioner for inspection. Records inspected by the commissioner under this section are nonpublic data as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 9, and may be used solely for the purpose of enforcing this section. " Minn. Stat. § 115A.47, subd. 5. This law requires haulers and other persons who dispose. or who arrange to dispose, of waste at environmentally inferior facilities to indemnify generators, establish and pay into a trust fund, and pay an administration fee to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) Commissioner. In addition, persons subject to the law must submit quarterly reports that include the following information: 1)the amount of waste in tons or in cubic yards that was managed at an environmentally inferior facility each month and 2) the amount of money paid into a trust fund for each month. The MPCA staff also recommend that the report include the following additional information that is required under the proposed rules: I) the name, address and permit number of the environmentally inferior facility. 2)the landfill's classification as an inferior or superior disposal facility, and 3)the report must correlate the amount of waste managed at an environmentally inferior facility to its county of origin. The first quarterly report will be due on April 29, 1995, and cover the months of February and March 1995. Page 2 of the enclosed material has a form that you may use to order a copy of a quarterly report form. If the requirements of this provision of the law apply to you,you should be setting aside money in a trust fund as of February 1, 1995. Failure to follow the requirements of the law will make you subject to enforcement actions by the MPCA. If you are not certain if this portion of the law applies to you, please read through the enclosed materials, which have more specific information. In most cases, haulers will be responsible for meeting the requirements of the law and establishing the trust funds; however, in some circumstances responsibility could lie with a city, transfer station operator, or waste generator. If you manage waste according to the method specified in a state law or the solid waste management plan for the county where the waste was generated. you will not need to set up a trust fund. You will likely need to establish a trust fund if: 520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (612)296-6300(voice); (612)282-5332 (TTY) Regional Offices: Duluth•Brainerd•Detroit Lakes•Marshall•Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer•Printed on recycled paper containing at least 10%fibers from paper recycled by consumers. Page 2 1. You landfill waste when a state law(such as the municipal solid waste processing mandate in the Twin Cities metropolitan area)or county plan and implementation documents call for it to be processed (incinerated, composted, or converted to refuse-derived fuel). In Greater Minnesota, some county plans may provide'exemptions to processing requirements: please contact county staff if you have questions about local plans. The nani es of county contact persons are enclosed. i 'r 2. You take waste to a Landfill-that does not meet the requirements for a new Subtitle D facility(an"inferior disposal facility"), when the county plan and implementation documents call for waste to be managed at a landfill that does meet Subtitle D standards for a new facility(a"superior disposal facility"). (See Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapters 257 and 258.) For your information, environmentally inferior facility compliance costs are a cost of operating your business and are subject to the 6.5 percent SCORE sales tax. Please assess this tax on all costs to establish and pay into a trust fund and pay an administrative charge to the commissioner. If you have questions, please call Cristine Leavitt, of my staff, at(612) 296-8439. Sincerely, James L. Warner, P.E. Division Manager Ground Water and Solid Waste Division JLW:JP Enclosures Q. To what types of waste does the law apply? A. The law applies to solid waste delivered to MSW(municipal solid waste) landfills, under certain circumstances. Waste delivered to demolition landfills and industrial landfills is not affected. Furthermore, demolition wastes and industrial wastes delivered to an MSW landfill, but placed in cells separate from MSW, do not fall under the requirements of the law. Q. How much are EIF trust fund payments? A. For waste delivered to an inferior disposal facility, the fee is $6.45/cubic yard, or$21.25/ton. For waste delivered to a superior disposal facility, the fee is $1.38/cubic yard, or$4.60/ton. Trust fund payments must be made on a monthly basis. Q. How much are EIF administration fees? A. For all waste delivered to a superior or inferior disposal facility, administration fees of $.30/cubic yard or$1.00/ton, must be paid to: Environmentally Inferior Facility Liaison, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN. 55155-4194. Q. Do I need to set up more than one trust fund if I deliver waste to more than one environmentally inferior facility? A. No: you do not have to set up more than one trust fund. However, you do need to keep the accounting for each facility separate. and funds set aside for one facility mai not be used for another. Q. Does the law have any reporting requirements? A. Yes. The person who sets up a trust fund must report the destination and quantity of waste delivered to environmentally inferior facilities and the amount paid into the trust fund on a quarterly basis to the Commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. You can obtain a copy of a quarterly reporting form by filling out the request form in this packet of information Minnesota Pollution Control Agency February 1995 , : F { Mail this form to: Julie Pederson Ground Water and Solid Waste Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 N. Lafayette Rd. St. Paul, MN. 55155 OR Fax this form to: Julie Pederson Ground Water and Solid Waste Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency fax number: 612-296-9707 EIF Information Request Name Company Address City State Zip Code Phone Fax Please send me the following (check all that apply): _a copy of the EIF law _a trust agreement form and a fact sheet on how to set up a trust fund _a quarterly report form a copy of the proposed EIF rules Minnesota Pollution Control Agency February 1995 Q. How does the EIF law apply in the 7-county Twin Cities metropolitan area? A. The Twin Cities metropolitan area includes Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington counties. State law requires that all mixed municipal waste (MSW) generated in the Twin Cities metropolitan area be processed. Because of this requirement, all persons who dispose, or arrange to dispose of unprocessed mixed municipal solid waste from the Twin Cities metropolitan area at MSW landfills must establish a trust fund, pay the administration fee, and indemnify generators. Persons who dispose of construction and demolition debris at MSW landfills may need to meet the requirements of the law; to determine if the law applies, they should check the provisions of the solid waste plan and implementation documents in the county where the waste was generated. Q. The metropolitan area waste I collect has always been certified as unprocessible. Do I still need to meet the requirements of the EIF law and rules? A. Yes. The certification decision is made once a year, after the waste has already been disposed. Because of this, persons must establish the trust fund, pay the administration fee, and indemnify generators, even if the waste they manage may later be certified as unprocessible. The law does not provide the flexibility for the Agency to reimburse trust fund payments if waste is certified as unprocessible after is landfilled. Q. Must I establish a trust fund for processing facility residuals or bypass due to normal processing facility downtime? A. No. Residuals from processing facilities, rejects, and bypass associated with normal facility downtime or seasonal peaks in waste generation will not require a trust fund. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency February 1995 • • This sheet provides cases studies involving transfer stations and contracts. It helps illustrate how to determine who should establish a trust fund when more than one party handles a load of solid waste. Generally speaking, the person who actually delivers the waste to the landfill will be responsible because that person usually controls the choice of where to take the waste. If contracts remove that choice, however, the person who has control over the destination of the waste, through the provisions of the contract, becomes responsible for meeting the requirements of the law. Case 1: A hauler delivers waste to a transfer station. The transfer station operator pays a second hauler to remove the waste from the station. The second hauler choses to take the waste to an environmentally inferior facility. In this case, three different parties handle the waste. It is the second hauler, however,who must set up the EIF trust fund. The second hauler has control over the final destination of the waste,and was the party who actually delivered the waste to the environmentally inferior facility. Case 2: A hauler is under contract with a city to deliver waste to a particular transfer station. The transfer station operator hauls it to an environmentally inferior facility. The hauler,because of the contract provisions,does not have a choice of where to deliver the waste, however, the transfer station operator does. In this case, the transfer station operator is responsible for meeting the requirements of the law and rules, including indemnifying generators,establishing a trust fund,and paying the administration fee. Case 3: A city collects its own waste,and delivers it to a transfer station. The city has a contract with the transfer station; the contract specifics for the transfer station to take the waste to a particular facility,which happens to be environmentally inferior. A city may, through its contracting process,direct where its waste will go. In this specific case, the contract requires the transfer station operator to deliver waste to an environmentally inferior facility. Because the city contract specifies where to direct the waste, the city is responsible for meeting the requirements of the law and rule, rather than the transfer station operator. If no facility or method had been specified, the transfer station operator would have been responsible. Case 4: By choice,a hauler delivers waste to a transfer station. The transfer station chooses,but is not required by contract with a local government,to deliver the waste to an environmentally inferior facility. In this situation,both the hauler and the transfer station have the ability to direct the waste. Because the transfer station operator actually arranges to deliver the waste to the environmentally inferior facility, however, the transfer station operator is responsible for meeting the requirements of the law and rules. Case 5: By choice,a hauler delivers waste to a transfer station that has a contract with an environmentally inferior facility for the delivery of the waste. In this case, the transfer station operator must meet the requirements of the law. The transfer station operator has the ability to direct the waste; in this case. the operator chose to contract with an inferior facility for delivery. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency February 1995 9. Sheet! County Contact List County County Solid Waste Phone Number Officer/Administrator Aitkin James Sayre 218-927-4357 Anoka Env.Services 612-422-7063 Becker Dan Holm 218-846-7310 Beltrami Bill Patnaude 218-759-4158 Benton George Minerich 612-968-6254 ext.212 Big Stone-1 Mildred Thymian 612-839-3136 Blue Earth-1 Ken Frederick 507-389-8381 Brown Charles Enter 507-233-6640 Carlton Bruce E.Benson 218-384-9174 Carver-2 Michael Lein 612-361-1800 Cass Paul Fairbanks i 218-547-3300 ext.287 Chippewa Steven Lawrence 612-269-6231 Chisago ;Mr.Marion Hemmsbergen 612-426-7999 ext.447 Clay !Jean Brandt 218-299-5002 Clearwater Tim Nelson 1218 -694-6183 Cook Tim Kennedy 218-387-2282 Cottonwood 'Mike Kirchmeier 507-831-2441 Crow Wing Karl Fryklind 218-828-2971 Dakota-1,2 Lynn Thompson 612-891-7042 Dodge Mark Gamm 507-635-6273 Douglas Dennis Nagle 1612-762-2381 ext.213 Faribault-1 I Dennis Hanselman 1507-776-3232 Fillmore Neil Bremseth 507-765-2430 Freeborn 1 Mike Klukow 507-377-5186 Goodhue !Myrna Halbach 1612-385-3101 Grant 1Jim Standish ;218-685-1494 Hennepin Janet Leick 1612-348-6445 Houston ;Rick Frank 507-724-5800 Hubbard 'Vern Massie 1218-732-9568 Isanti !Joe Basta 1612-689-5165 Itasca Terry Greenside 1218-327-2857 Jackson-1 ,Arlene Vee 1507-847-2210 Kanabec (Ronald Grace 41612-679-3173 Kandiyohi-1 !Jeff Bredberg 1612-231-6229 Kittson !Gary Rice 1218-843-2113 Koochiching-1 Nolan Baratono 218-283-6257 Lac Qui Parle Darrel Ellefson 612-598-3132 Lake Alan GoodmanYvonne Everting 218-834-8380 Lake of the Woods Gary Lockner 1218-634-1945 LeSueur-1 Bruce Jones 612-357-2251 ext.211 Lincoln Vance Turner 507-694-1153 Lyon Paul Henriksen 507-537-6733 Mahnomen Mark Dickman 1218-935-5639 Marshall Don Matz 218-745-6007 Martin Dennis Hanselman 1507-776-3232 McLeod 1Ed Homan 1612-864-5551 ex-t.1259 Meeker-1 Paul Virnig 1612-693-6329 Mille Lacs !Randy Piasecki 1612-983-3146 Page 1 I Sheetl Morrison Jeff Meyer 612-632-2941 ext. 122 Mower-1 Jeffrey A.Weaver 507-437-9551 - Murray-I Kurt Schmidt 507-836-6327 Nicollet-1 Bob Podhradski 507-931-6800 Nobles-I Shane Shahra Missaghi 507-372-8228 ext.259 _ Norman Kevin Ruud 218-784-3605 Olmsted Gene Mossing 507-285-8231 _ Otter Tail Mike Hanan 218-739-2271 ext.493 Pennington Howard Person 218-681-2116 Pine Shirley Basta 612-629-6781 ext. 122 Pipestone-1 Dale Taubert 507-825-4246 Polk Katherine Logan 218-281-6445 Pope Michael D.Howe 612-634-5301 Ramsey Zack Hansen 612-292-7900 Red Lake-1 George Daily 218-253-4121 Redwood Kent Runkel 507-637-2811 Renville-1 Doug Knutson 612-523-1172 Rice-1 Robert Fitzsimons 507-332-6833 Rock-I Richard Dillon 507-283-4456 Roseau Jeff Pelowski 218-463-3750 Scott-2 Al Frechette 612-496-8177 Sherburne Dave Lucas 612-241-2903 Sibley-1 Gene Isakson 612-237-2941 St.Louis Terry Soderberg 1218-749-9703 or 800-450-9278 Stearns Don Adams 1612-656-3613 or 800-450-0852 Steele !Scott Golberg 15074514842 Stevens-1 Bill Kleindel 1612-589-7420 Swift Scott Collins 612-843-2356 Todd-1 Tom Sand 1612-594-2210 Traverse-1 Gary Tracy .612-563-1411 Wabasha-1 ,Tom Mosher ,1612-565-2577 Wadena-1 ,Greg J.Kempf 218-631-4455 Waseca 'Lee Williams 1507-835-0662 Washington Judy Arends 612-430-6668 Watonwan IGeryA.Engstrom 1507-375-3393 Wilkin 'Bruce Popple 1218-643-5815 Winona 1Jon Penheiter 507-457-6460 Wright ,Chuck Davis 612-682-7338 ext.7331 Yellow Medicine-1 Mike Gort 1612-669-7524 WLSSD Kurt Soderberg 218-722-3336 1 -County Plan update/amendments due,which may change their Plan. Page 2 p . . ,. . . . . . . . ...... ,0, • • ::...:4 :..::.§ :..-E:..A :: , : .0: ,„,,,.....„....,.........,,..k.,,„:„..„4„:„.....,...„:„..,..,014...40::„.4., ..„..„.........„,...:Ain::„.•.,,,A.:::::::„,:.x.,,,,,..„.tzr,;1:4:,•:•., ..1...5.,.., : a.,..!..:44,:v:‘,.:,„,00?„..-•::,,,..„...„,,...„:„1-„,....,.-.„.„....,:m.::;".•..„..,.....•:...x.:..t.:„...„0:.,„.•..„,...„..,4,..„.„..„,,,,,,,:wx„,..*::4,....,-%..,..„.,>„<„,•-•„:„...„4:„,„.< „,„:„:.:::„.::.......,:.:.:::::::::.:::,...,..-.:.,,..„....„..„....:.:.:. . ,,,,,,.::,„,,,::x,,*„.•,,..v.,, ,..:?.. ...,„:„. .„::,,:„.-,: :::i,i.K.1,,,,,.,-„,„„.;..4,..„,,,..„:„‘ „::0„.•5)„.74.. .,,,,,,,,,,, ,,t. :::,,,..,i,.i.. ,:::::,,..,... .., .. :::_..:•:..::::.:..,..,.,.:...,::.:.„.:.:.:::::i..ii,..:::.:.,.:::::.::::... .0mAim*:ii .;.„:....:.,-„,,,:,„,:.‘.:•••:?;. ..,..,..o.m.q. ?.,,...Kto.r.,.m.1...1 n A Ir?.• ..t01,K,V,, ,.°....,%%e,,"..i>...:t,:t':',,.?!..??..."::-',--",,-,,-::.'•:,.',.,,,,---.•••-,"- ' INVINERNOWNWINE linthiiiatiaNCE iNION. taiiii1040 lnt4flkiiriEr.7.1..,*!77iiiig IMMISIMMININEMON iiiiiiMraatiNIMEMENINEINHOON tettledWOON'::::3:§i Minnesota:For updates on landfill status contact Julie Pedersen at(612)296-7788 , Blue Earth/Ponderosa SLF Yes Yes Superior Brown Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Burnsville SLF Yes Yes Superior Clay Co. SLF No Yes ' Inferior Cook Co. SLF Yes No Inferior Cottonwood Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Crow Wing SLF(new) Yes Yes Superior _ East Central SLF Yes Yes Superior Elk River SLF Yes Yes Superior Fergus Falls SLF Can only accept ash, Yes NA lined ash area Forest City Rd(.Yonak SLF) Yes Yes Superior_ Goodhue Co. SLF(Red Wing SLF) No Yes Inferior Greater Morrison SLF Yes Yes Superior Kandiyohi Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Lyon Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Mar-Kit SLF Yes Yes Superior McLeod Co. SLF. Yes Yes Superior Nobles Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Northeast Otter Tail Can only accept ash, lined Yes NA ash area Olmsted Co. -Kalmar SLF Yes Yes Superior Pine Bend SLF Yes Yes Superior Polk Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Pope-Douglas SLF Can only accept ash, lined Yes NA ash area Renville Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Rice Co. SLF No Yes Inferior St. Louis County Regional LF Yes Yes Superior Steele Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Winona SLF Yes,but currently filling Yes Inferior unlined area to grade WLSSD SLF&Ind.LF Yes Yes Superior This information is dated and subject to change. It is recommended that you periodically verify landfill status with state regulatory staff identified above. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency-2/14/95 February 1995 • actav,,,40-ip , g :5* MSS w; !t ig iioNm tkatat -4.kk„ giw ' ••"s‘, :;•ggie,•,,,XWAMFM: aftt! NESEEManiiiNINEEN syggeopolowagoi nimmigw:stwo iiiiiiimegibemonsmannien assamithIssaiir. Illinois Galletin Landfill Yes Yes Superior Iowa: For updates on landfill status contact Joe Obr at(515)281-8934 or Lavoy Haage(515)281-4968 Dickinson Co.Landfill(Spirit Yes Yes Superior Lake, IO/Sanifill, Inc.) Flannegan No No Inferior Lake Mills Landfill/Winnebago No/Yes Yes Inferior if disposed in unlined area/Superior if disposed in lined area North Dallas Landfill \ No No Inferior Winneishiek County Landfill No No Inferior North Dakota: For updates on landfill status contact Neil Knatterud at(701)328-5166 City of Fargo SLF-in Cass Co. Yes Yes Superior Big Dipper SLF-U.S.A Waste Yes Yes Superior Grand Forks Landfill No Yes Inferior South Dakota: For updates on landfill status contact Carolyn Trautman at(605) 773-6257 Brookings SLF Yes Yes Superior Roberts Co. Landfill Yes Yes Superior Souix Falls SLF Yes Yes Superior Watertown SLF Yes Yes Superior Wisconsin: For updates on landfill status contact Paul Huebner at(608)267-7573 City of Superior Landfill No-has 5'clay liner Yes Inferior • Jackson County Inc.Landfill Yes Yes Superior LaCrosse Co. Landfill Yes Yes Superior Lake Area Disposal Landfill-BFI Yes Yes Superior North Woods SLF No-is lined but does not Yes Inferior meet Subtitle D Timberline Trail Landfill(Rusk) Yes Yes Superior This information is dated and subject to change. It is recommended that you periodically verify landfill status with state regulatory staff identified above or with the landfill owner. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency-2/14/95 February 1995 AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 9e (3) Name: Tom Kaldunski r )Ljj-fL/ Department: Public Works cr, Date: March 10 , 1995 1,0 V 1 I 9 41.9 jr1 Meeting Date: March 20 , 199567'7117 Category: Unfinished Business Subject: Approve Capital Outlay Request - Solid Waste Equipment Purchase Explanation: Purchase solid waste vehicles based on Council review of operations Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo/Request - Tom Kaldunski Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Tom Kaldunski Public Works Ben Klotz Public Works Jay Kennedy Public Works Lena Larson Public Works -1411:14I 41 Signature MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE SOLID WASTE EQUIPMENT PURCHASE DATE: MARCH 20, 1995 The City received bids for three (3) solid waste vehicles in November 1994. The following recommendations were given to the City Council per my January 13, 1995, memo (attached): Description Cost (including tax) Recommended Vendor 1) Automated Side Loader $146,648.37 MacQueen Equipment 2) Automated Recycling Truck $121,198.06 MacQueen Equipment 3) Read Loading Packer $ 80,225.19 ABM Equipment The City requested and received an extension of the 90 days for holding bids. The original bids expired the end of February. This Council Meeting is 138 days from the original bid date. The Council should make some decisions regarding these bids at its March 20, 1995, meeting after reviewing the various scenarios presented separately. The Council has many options to consider: 1. Reject all bids and consider rebidding for equipment. It will take at least two months to rebid and six to eight months to receive equipment if this option is selected equipment prices would most likely go up. I would not recommend this option. 2. If the Council determines that the City will continue to collect the M.S.W. (mixed solid waste), the automated side loader and rear load packer should be awarded at this meeting, by Council Resolution and approval of the Capital Outlay attached. 3. If the Council determines that the City will continue collecting recyclables, the recycling truck should be awarded at this meeting, by Resolution. 4. If the Council determines that the City should solicit RFP's for recycling, the bids for the recycling truck should be rejected at this meeting. Many other options and combinations can be considered. It is my recommendation that the City Council take action on the November 1994 bids by awarding the equipment contracts that the City will continue to use. Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke TJK Benno Klotz Lena Larson PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. R -95 AWARDING BIDS TO VENDORS AND SOLID WASTE VEHICLES Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 20th day of March, 1995 at 7:00 P.M. The following member were present: The following member were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, pursuant to properly published notice, bids were received, opened and tabulated, which complied with the advertisement; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received a recommendation from the Director of Public Works on the awards for these equipment purchases. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. The City Council hereby awards the contract for the automated side loading packer to MacQueen Equipment in the amount of$137,698.00 plus tax (a total of$146,648.37). 2. The City Council hereby awards the contract for the rear loading packer with trade-in to ABM Equipment in the amount of$75,328.82 plus tax (a total of$80,225.19). 3. The Mayor and Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to sign the appropriate contracts. The resolution adopted by recorded note of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 20th day of March, 1995. Mayor Attested to the day of , 1995. Clerk/Administrator SEAL '.'\ MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: DISCUSS SOLID WASTE,ESTABLISH WORKSHOP DATE AND RECEIVE EQUIPMENT BIDS AND ADOPT RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACTS DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995 Council Member Don Gamer approached Larry Thompson with a request to discuss Solid Waste at the next Council meeting. Mr. Gamer is interested in discussing the possibility of bidding out solid waste services similar to the White Bear Lake contract. The Council should discuss this item and give staff some direction. It was my understanding that the City Council was interested in setting up a 3-4 hour workshop to review the Solid Waste operations in detail. There are many options to . consider in setting a plan of action for Solid Waste operations in the near future. Staff has begun collecting information on the various options. The Finance Department has begun a financial analy- sis to be presented at the workshop. The City Council should set a date for the Solid Waste work- shop at its January 17, 1995 meeting. Attached is a copy of a memo dated 12/1/94 which outlines the bids that were received on November 30, 1994. The bids are good for 90 days. The following outlines my recommendations on the award of the contracts; 1) Recycling Truck-The recycling operations are extremely complex. The City will have to determine which options to follow in recycling. These options range from complete source separation of recyclables to commingled recycling. There are sev- eral options between these depending upon the number of recycling product streams selected. The current bid was set up for commingling of recyclables with two streams of materials; 1) fibers, 2) glass, cans,plastics with a neck. Recent discussions with vendors on recyclables has indicated that the markets for recycling have improved and it may be to the City's advantage to separate recyclables into more streams. Currently,the City has residents source separate with the crew collecting them as commingled. The City has to pay for disposal of commingled recyclables,however, the labor costs are reduced through time savings. This was necessary to keep up with rapid growth in 1993 and 1994. It is my recommendation that the Council take no action on the recycling truck bids until the workshop is held. The bids are good until the end of February, 1995. This will allow adequate time for staff to review all of the City's options. 2) Automated Side Loader-The Public Works Department has been planning to get this vehicle since 1993. The Department needs this vehicle to keep up with growth and to provide a replacement for the old truck. The old truck will be a good back up vehicle. This vehicle is reaching a point where it will require a lot of maintenance if it is to be kept on the daily routes. Cost of maintenance would go up. The Department had similar experiences in the mid to late 80's when enough was spent maintaining old '\ vehicles to have provided funds to buy a replacement. It is in the City's best interest to replace this vehicle now. The Department needs this vehicle now regardless of future Council decisions as to whether the City remains in the business or not. It is my recommendation that the City award the contract to MacQueen Equip. Co. in the amount of S137,698.00 plus tax, (a total of$146,648.30). ABM Equipment had submitted a lower bid for a vehicle that does not meet the specifications. ABM's vehicle does not have the speed and efficiency of the Rapid Rail bid by MacQueen. The savings offered by ABM's lower bid would be lost in a slower collection time. The crew has reviewed the vehicles bid and they concur with this recommendation. The ABM bid should be rejected in the City's best interest. 2) Rear Load Packer-This bid is intended to replace the existing 1981 vehicle. The old vehicle is worm out and the City will trade it in with this bid. It is my recommendation to award this contract to ABM Equipment in the amount of • $75,328.82 plus tax(a total of S80,225.19). MacQueen Equipment Company had submitted an alternate bid for approximately$930.00 less,however the vehicle offered is slightly smaller than the vehicle bid by ABM. The crew has reviewed all the vehicles bid and they concur with my recommendation. • Funding for the purchase of these two vehicles has been provided for on the 1995 budgets. Some of 1 the funding is from a 1993 Equipment Certificate. It is recommended that the City Council approve the Capital Outlay for the Rear Load Packer and the Automated Side Loader at this meeting. A proposed resolution is attached with a Capital Outlay Request. The bids for the recycling truck will be brought to the Council in February after the workshop. Thomas J.Kaldunski,P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke TJK Benno Klotz Lena Larson • REQUEST FORM CAPITAL OUTLAY PURCHASES DEPARTMENT Public Works DATE OF REQUEST 1/13/95 ITEM(S) TO BE PURCHASED (1) Automated Side Load Packer AMOUNT PROVIDED IN ORIGINAL/ADJUSTED 19 95 BUDGET: $ 125,000.00 AMOUNT REMAINING AS OF DATE OF REQUEST: $ 125,000. 00 QUOTATIONS RECEIVED: s 1. VENDOR MacQueen Equip. DATE 12/1/94 AMOUNT $ 146, 648 . 37 2 . VENDOR ABM Equip. DATE 12/1/94 AMOUNT $ 142,533 . 08 ::ATTACH QUOTATIONS, IF VERBAL QUOTES, EXPLAIN BELOW COMMENTS : Bid by ABM Equipment did not meet or exceed specifications and it is rejected by Director of Public Works memo. )..a4L47 4X-- D PARTM HEAD SIGNATURE DATE FINANCE DIRECTOR SIGNATURE DATE TO: THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL I RECOMMEND THE ABOVE REQUEST BE APPROVED. SIGNATURE OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE ACTION TAKEN BY THE .COUNCIL ON THE DAY OF 19 (A?PROVED) (NOT APPROVED) FILE: CC: Y REQUEST FORM CAPITAL OUTLAY PURCHASES DEPARTMENT Public Works DATE OF REQUEST 1/13/95 ITEM(S) TO BE PURCHASED (1) Rear Load Packer with Trade-In of 1981 Packer Truck AMOUNT PROVIDED IN ORIGINAL/ADJUSTED 19 95 BUDGET: $ 85,000. 00 AMOUNT REMAINING AS OF DATE OF REQUEST: $ 85,000. 00 QUOTATIONS RECEIVED: 1 . VENDOR MacQueen Equip. DATE 12/1/94 AMOUNT $ 79, 295 . 64 2. VENDOR ABM Equip. DATE 12/1/94 AMOUNT $ 80, 225. 19 2:ATTACH QUOTATIONS, IF VERBAL QUOTES, EXPLAIN BELOW COMMENTS : See memo for Director of Public Works recommendation for heavier duty vehicle from ABM. This funding is from a' 1993 Equipment Certificate. • D PARTME,P HEADSIGNATURE DATE FINANCE DIRECTOR SIGNATURE DATE TO: THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL I RECOMMEND THE ABOVE REQUEST BE APPROVED. SIGNATURE OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE ACTION TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL ON THE DAY OF 19 (A?PROVED) (NOT APPROVED) FILE: CC : • AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 9e (4) Name: Tom Kaldunskim,.,, Department: Public Works oi4 / Date: March 10, 1995' -"D V Meeting Date: March 20, 1995 i22)jjPa2)e'-jL/ Category: Unfinished Business Subject: Approve Agreement with Knutson for Solid Waste Disposal and Transfer Explanation: The existing agreement will expire soon. Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo/Agreement - Tom Kaldunski Referred To: (Name) Department Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Tom Kaldunksi Public Works Ben Klotz Public Works Lena Larson Public Works Jay Kennedy Public Works '.1:1"ca/1 I Signature MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH KNUTSON SERVICES, INC., FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DATE: MARCH 20, 1995 Attached you will find a copy of an agreement between the City of Farmington and Knutson Services, Inc. (KSI). This agreement is for the transfer and disposal of mixed municipal solid waste. The City currently has an agreement with KSI which expires on March 31, 1995. This new agreement extends the old one and clarifies language. The tipping fee has remained the same at $66.84 per ton. The main charge revolves around the Trust Fund for the Use of Environmentally Sound Facilities. This new fee is based upon recent legislation and it is $5.60 per ton. Wayne Henneke, the Finance Director, has presented a recommendation on a rate increase for the Trust Fund in a separate memo. It is recommended that the City Council approve the new agreement for April 1, 1995 through March 26, 1996, with KSI. 1:14#,L, Thomas J. Kaldunski, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer TJK/pr cc: file Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke Dave Grannis TJK CITY OF FARMINGTON AND KNUTSON SERVICES, INC. AGREEMENT FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES April 1, 1995 through March 28, 1996 AGREEMENT made as of March , 1995, between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation (CITY) and KNUTSON SERVICES, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota Corporation (KSI), 15120 Chippendale Avenue, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068. The CITY and KSI do hereby agree to the following terms, definitions and specifications: (Pages 2 through 6 inclusive, Attachment A and B) SPECIFICATIONS I. PURPOSE OF CONTRACT Knutson Services, Inc. (KSI) shall provide City of Farmington with the transfer and disposal of mixed municipal and commercial solid waste. II. TERM OF CONTRACT The term of this contract shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing April 1, 1995. This agreement may be terminated by either party after giving ninety (90) days written notice to the other party. Contract shall automatically renew for another year if no termination notice is given with same like terms. III. DEFINITION OF TERMS "Recyclables" are reusable or reprocessable materials approved and agreed to by the parties hereto. Recyclables include such items as newsprint, corrugated and ledger paper, magazines and catalogs, glass (three colors), plastics with a neck, and bi-metal and aluminum cans. "Toxic and hazardous" wastes are waste materials including but not limited to poisons, wastes, radioactive materials, flammable or explosive materials, and similar harmful chemicals and wastes which require special handling and must be disposed of in a manner to conserve the environment and protect the public health and safety. "Mixed Municipal and Commercial Solid Waste Only" The City warrants that the waste materials delivered will not knowingly contain any unacceptable toxic or hazardous waste listed above as defined by the federal, state, or local laws or regulations. This does not include items such as appliances, tires, or bulk items which the City may make other arrangements for. "Environmental Inferior Facility"- EIF is a trust fund that all haulers must collect for future liability of landfills utilized. This fee is assessed as an additional tonnage rate per ton (see attachment A). Paying this fee indemnifies the City of Farmington, it's residents and commercial businesses, from any future liabilities. 2 SPECIFICATIONS IV. SCOPE OF CONTRACT 1. Transfer and Disposal of Solid Waste by KS( a) KSI will provide the transfer and disposal of mixed municipal and commercial solid waste. b) KSI is responsible for disposal of the City of Farmington's municipal and commercial solid waste. KSI shall advise the City, in writing, of the place of the final destination of disposal (superior landfill). Attached is a MPCA listing of all superior landfills in the metropolitan area (attachment B). KSI must have final approval in writing of any landfill destination changes from the Director of Public Works of the City of Farmington. c) KSI will provide monthly weight reports to the City. 1 c. The KSI must provide monthly reports for all materials collected no later than the 15th day of the following month. The required information included original truck scale tickets and the net weight. 2c. KSI will provide appropriate area for disposing of solid waste so as not to interrupt the operation of the City and it's services. 2. Service Schedule a) All dumping of solid waste materials shall be conducted between the hours of 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday so as not to interrupt the MRF operation. Any deviation of this schedule will be acceptable with a 24 hour communication from authorized personnel from the City. b) KSI will notify the City of any schedule changes five (5) working days in advance in writing. 3. Performance Standards a) City staff shall abide by all regulations and safety policies while on MRF premises. This would include speed requirements, scale access, safety procedures, and the proper procedures for filling-out origin forms and weight tickets. 4. Complaints a) The contractor shall establish and maintain, in a location approved by the City, an office with continuous supervision, for accepting complaints. The office shall be in service during the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, except holidays and as specified in the Contract. Address and telephone number of such office and any changes shall be given to the City in writing. 3 SPECIFICATIONS b) Whenever the City notifies KSI of a complaint in writing, KSI is required to respond no later than the following working day from the time of the complaint if the complaint can be resolved within this time period. If the complaint cannot be resolved within one (1) working day, the City and KSI will come to an agreed resolution and time period in writing to later than one (1) working day after the complaint. This applies also to any concerns of KSI. 5. Legal Compliance a) KSI shall comply with ordinances of the City and the laws and regulations of the State of Minnesota and its agencies relating to the transferring of solid waste in effect during the term of the Contract. KSI will provide annual disclosure of destination of solid waste to the City of Farmington. b) KSI shall provide and maintain all sanitary and safety accommodations for the use and protection of its employees as may be necessary to provide for their health and welfare and comply with federal, state, and local codes and regulations, as well as those of other bodies and tribunals having jurisdiction. Employee safety and sanitation facility regulations are set forth in Minnesota Statutes 182 and in the Department of Labor and Industry's Labor Safety Code (LISC 73-75). 6. Records and Reporting a) KSI shall keep complete and accurate records in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices. KSI shall provide the City with a report of the volume or weight of the refuse dumped at the MRF. Such reports shall be submitted by the 15th day of each month, reporting for the previous month. V. PAYMENT METHOD A. The City will compensate KSI for all solid waste disposed of at KSI's transfer sight according to the rates set forth in Attachment A. Payment will be based on the number of tons generated within these categories. B. During the period of the contract, the City will pay to KSI such compensation on or before the 10th of each month. The compensation shall be for the material received at the MRF during the proceeding calendar month in accordance with the directions from the City Manager. IV. INSURANCE, AND INDEMNIFICATION. A. Insurance: During the entire period of the Contract, the Contractor shall maintain, at its cost and expense, and file with the City, policies or certificates of Workers' Corn- pensation and Liability Insurance. Minimum insurance policy coverage requirements are $300,000 bodily injury per person, $500,000 aggregate per occurrence, and $100,000 property damage. 4 SPECIFICATIONS (Continued) All policies evidencing insurance required by this Paragraph shall name the City and KSI as named insurers, and shall insure the City and KSI by reasons of any act or omission, including negligence, of KSI or of KSI's employees or agents in performing this Contract. Such policies shall be in form and content satisfactory to the City Attorney, and shall be filed with the City Clerk. The City shall be notified ten (10) days before any cancellation of insurance. A certificate showing that the KSI has in effect the aforesaid insurance covering both KSI and the City shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days from the execution of the Contract, and yearly thereafter, at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the expiration of said policies of insurance for each year of the Contract. All of the foregoing policies shall be issued by an insurance company or companies licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota and authorized to assume the risks covered thereby. Memorandum policies and receipts for the payment of premiums shall be filed with the City showing payment of premiums for at least one year in advance and on each renewal date provided therein upon the city's request of such payments. B. Indemnification: KSI agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City , its agents, officers and employees from any and all claims, causes of action, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, expenses including reasonable attorneys' fees, suits, demands and judgments of any nature, because of bodily injury to, or death of, any person or persons and/or because of damages to property of KSI or others, including loss of use from any cause whatsoever, which may be asserted against the City on account of any act or omission, including negligence, of KSI or KSI's employees or agents in connection with KSI performance of this Contract. KSI agrees to defend any action brought against the City on any such matters, and to pay and satisfy any judgment entered thereof together with all costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith. The City shall in no way be liable for any claims or charges incurred by KSI in the performance of this Contract. VII. NONDISCRIMINATION. A. Guaranty of Nondiscrimination: KSI agrees that during the life of the contract, KSI will not, within the State of Minnesota, discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, national origin or ancestry, or sex, and will include a similar provision in all subcontracts entered into for the performance thereof. This Paragraph is inserted in the Contract to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, 181.59. 5 SPECIFICATIONS VIII. TRANSFER, ASSIGNMENT AND LIENS. A. Transfer of Sale: KSI will not make or create, or suffer to be made or created any total or partial sale, assignment, conveyance, or lease, or any trust or power, or transfer in any other mode or form of or with respect to this Agreement or any part thereof or any interest therein, or any contract or agreement to do any of the same, without the prior written approval of the City, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. The City shall be entitled to require exceot as otherwise provided in this Agreement. as conditions to any such approval that; 1. Any proposed transferee shall have the qualifications and financial responsibility, as reasonably determined by the City, necessary and adequate to fulfill the obligations undertaken in this Agreement by KSI; and 2. The transfer does not create an anti-trust situation in the local refuse hauling industry that is contrary to the public interest of the residents of Farmington; and IX. TERMINATION 3. It is understood the essence of this Contract is for the transfer and disposal of mixed municipal and commercial solid waste in accordance with this Agreement. As such, if the City determines that KSI is in breach of any provision of this Contract, a written notice will be sent to KSI allowing them thirty (30) days to comply. Failure by KSI to comply with the Contract by the end of the thirty (30) day period the City will terminate the Contract and shall be released of its obligations. X. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Contract with Attachment A, incorporated herein by reference, is the entire • agreement between the parties. No modification of this Contract shall be valid or effective, unless made in writing and signed by both parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The City of Farmington and Knutson Services, Inc. have executed this agreement the day and year written below. KNB Y �UTSON S ' ' - 'C. CITY OF FARMINGTON .rA _ _ B - -- Y D.F. Wall, General Manager Mayor Date: ��/�lfs Date: --- By David Domack, Sales Manager Larry Thompson, City Administrator Date: 3-13 -TS- Date: 6 ATTACHMENT A The City of Farmington agrees to utilize Knutson Services, Inc. for the transfer and disposal of mixed municipal and commercial solid waste collected by the City of Farmington. City will notify KSI thirty (30) days in advance of any changes in volume activity due to changes in operation and/or destination of solid waste. The City warrants that the waste materials delivered will not knowingly contain any hazardous, toxic, or radioactive waste or substances as defined by federal, state, or local laws or regulations. KSI shall idemnify the City of Farmington as long as EIF is paid monthly. The following Charges will be assessed: Solid Waste Monthly Amount $66.84 per ton X Tonnage=Total Owed Environment Fund (EIF) $ 5.60 per tonX Tonnage =Total EIF Owed Total Charges for the City of Farmington are - $72.44 Per Ton All values may change based on current tonnage rates. The City of Farmington will be notified of any market value changes in writing thirty (30) days in advance. ATTACHMENT B (Continued) ..• 6tIEWitevmliSgiitattoio 0 of -tate gnu 4':.A10r4, g zatandingosimacmoigutelowtogitotoot6iticsaimotaNe. NINNIMEMSMNIONtigiOntiONMORMESMEMORMISSIMAINIM Illinois Galletin Landfill Yes Yes Superior Iowa: For updates on landfill status contact Joe Obr at(515)281-8934 or Lavoy Haage(515)281-4968 Dickinson Co.Landfill(Spirit Yes Yes Superior Lake, IO/Sanifill, Inc.) Flannegan No No Inferior Lake Mills Landfill/Winnebago No/Yes Yes Inferior if disposed in unlined area/Superior if disposed in lined area North Dallas Landfill No No Inferior Winneishiek County Landfill No No Inferior North Dakota: For updates on landfill status contact Neil Knatterud at(701)328-5166 City of Fargo SLF-in Cass Co. Yes Yes Superior Big Dipper SLF-U.S.A Waste Yes Yes Superior Grand Forks Landfill No Yes Inferior South Dakota: For updates on landfill status contact Carolyn Trautman at(605) 773-6257 Brookings SLF Yes Yes Superior Roberts Co. Landfill Yes Yes Superior Souix Falls SLF Yes Yes Superior Watertown SLF Yes Yes Superior Wisconsin: For updates on landfill status contact Paul Huebner at(608)267-7573 City of Superior Landfill No-has 5'clay liner Yes Inferior • Jackson County Inc. Landfill Yes Yes Superior LaCrosse Co.Landfill Yes Yes Superior Lake Area Disposal Landfill-BFI Yes Yes Superior North Woods SLF No-is lined but does not Yes Inferior meet Subtitle D Timberline Trail Landfill(Rusk) Yes Yes Superior This information is dated and subject to change. It is recommended that you periodically verify landfill status with state regulatory staff identified above or with the landfill owner. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency-2/14/95 February 1995 ATTACHMENT B ::.. 'i."o.:ii? : c:v',}•,:Y-.... ... rr•.T,-pp ,5:..:. , ..; f : •SYvN;n}} }}+fYl$}}:Y<iMv :i:?nv.y:n:- v'Z'uhv:-v :F ..ri:}\: v'vv;:n:vnS^}v:F'v; eru\N♦•? y.t.1: 4:.. . •:wMGy...,* ijn.swiJY ; :� ::, yySM;yv :i:to . nn: ..v+ }. }. n - . �n . b ; • 3Y • „ '\ .} y -•� iyY4 ` . hg �M � MA \' �� r� / fiAOs•> x: < } .: 4 't. } g" $ $ $y '' e'it$ Y � :<i:' '•Y: ... ... . i . t, + ; Y: : : dL > : ae MOAN xvxrn r4tiv n4Sy ?bvxxxvvnJ yv .4ww;: ..:.....x . .. . . nvrrh v f Minnesota: For updates on landfill status contact Julie Pedersen at(612)296-7788 Blue Earth/Ponderosa SLF Yes Yes Superior Brown Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Burnsville SLF Yes Yes Superior Clay Co. SLF - No Yes . Inferior Cook Co. SLF Yes No Inferior Cottonwood Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Crow Wing SLF(new) Yes Yes Superior East Central SLF , Yes Yes Superior Elk River SLF Yes Yes Superior Fergus Falls SLF Can only accept ash, Yes NA lined ash area Forest City Rd(Yonak SLF) Yes Yes Superior Goodhue Co. SLF(Red Wing SLF) No Yes Inferior Greater Morrison SLF Yes Yes Superior Kandiyohi Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Lyon Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Mar-Kit SLF Yes Yes Superior McLeod Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Nobles Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Northeast Otter Tail Can only accept ash,lined Yes NA ash area Olmsted Co. -Kalmar SLF Yes Yes Superior Pine Bend SLF Yes Yes Superior Polk Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Pope-Douglas SLF Can only accept ash, lined Yes NA ash area Renville Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Rice Co. SLF No Yes Inferior St. Louis County Regional LF Yes Yes Superior Steele Co. SLF Yes Yes Superior Winona SLF Yes,but currently filling Yes Inferior unlined area to grade WLSSD SLF&Ind. LF Yes Yes Superior This information is dated and subject to change. It is recommended that you periodically verify landfill status with state regulatory staff identified above. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency-2/14/95 February 1995 AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 10 a Name: Mike Palm Department: Firee/P Date: March 8 , 1995 Meeting Date: March 20, 1995 Category: New Business Subject: Adopt Resolution Establishing Permits and Fees for Fire Related Activities Explanation: Reference Material/Responsibilty Memo/Resolution - Mike Palm Referred To: (Name) Department Department Heads 64 V Signature Memo To: Mayor and Council Subject: Fire Permit Fees Date: March 8, 1995 The City of Farmington is in the process of installing a new permit system for the Building Inspection Department. I am also having Logis make up permit applications for Fire Department inspections. Along with the permit applications, I would like the City Council to adopt a resolution establishing permit fees. The fees would be for both new and remodeling of commercial construction and would include R-1 apartment housing. The permits and fees would cover the following: Fire Suppression Systems, Fire Alarm Systems Flammable Tank Systems, Hood & Duct Cleaning, and Open Burning. I have based these fees on the fee schedule used by the City of Golden Valley. For the fire suppression system, we are currently charging 1% of the total value plus State surcharge; I would like this charge to stay the same. For other systems, I propose the following charges: Fire Alarm System New installation 45.00 Alteration of existing system 45.00 * Additional charge of $5.00 for each $500 increase in valuation if the system exceeds $1,000 Flammable Tank Systems 500 gallons or less 15.00 501 gallons to 1,000 gallons 25.00 1,001 plus gallons 25.00 + 10.00/each additional 500 gal. Tank Removal 65.00/tank Hood and Duct Cleaning Inspect commercial cooking vent systems 40.00 Reinspect commercial cooking vent systems 40.00 Open Burning We currently charge $10.00 and propose that fee remain the same. It would be appreciated if this could be discussed during the March 20th Council meeting. Mike Palm Fire Marshal cc: Department Heads Development Committee PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. R AMEND RESOLUTION NO. R1-95 ADDING PERMIT FEES FOR FIRE RELATED ACTIVITIES Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 20th day of March, 1995 at 7: 00 P.M. . Members Present: Member Absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following: WHEREAS, Resolution No. R1-95 establishes fees and charges for various permits and activities within the City; and WHEREAS, it is desired to establish fees for certain fire related activities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following fire related activities require payment of the associated fees: Fire Alarm System New Installation $45.00 Alteration to Existing System 45. 00 * Additional Charge of $5. 00 for each $500 increase in value over $1000 Flammable Tank System 500 gallons or less 15. 00 501 - 1000 gallons 25. 00 1001 plus gallons 25.00 + 10. 00/each addn' l 500 gallons Tank Removal 65. 00/tank Hood and Duct Cleaning Inspect Commercial Cooking Vent Systems 40. 00 Reinspect Commercial Cooking Vent Systems 40.00 This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 20th day of March, 1995. Mayor Attested to the day of March, 1995. SEAL Clerk/Administrator AGENDA REQUEST FORM Item No. 10b Name: James Bell , Department: Parks and Recreation i Date: March 8 , 1995 Nr Meeting Date: March 20, 1 9 9 9 Category: New Business Subject: Street Lighting - City Wide Design and Lighting Plan Explanation: Reference Material/Responsibilty Jim Bell Referred To: (Name) Department Development Committee Signature �"� Memo to: Mayor and Council Subject: Street Light Standards Date: March 9, 1995 Over the past year the city has been looking to improve our street lighting. The council approved adopting new street light plates last year. The intent was to have three designs available to us(see attached plates). These were to be placed in the residential,heritage and downtown commercial areas within the city. When the plates were sent out to the electric service companies,the residential plate was not included. Therefore the developers were going to be charged for the heritage area lights. These are somewhat more expensive than the residential ones. The developers came in and met with the development committee and indicated that they were concerned as to the additional expense versus the standard pole that Dakota Electric had been using. They realized that the new residential pole was more expensive than the Dakota Electric pole but not as much as the Heritage pole. Enclosed is a price breakdown of the various options. We tried to stop the order of the heritage lights by Dakota Electric after becoming aware of this mix-up. The order had already been placed and partial shipment had been made to them. Dakota Electric does not want to keep the heritage poles in stock because the heritage district is not within their service area. I therefore recommend that we purchase the poles from them. The forty-one poles and anchors would be utilized on projects within the heritage district, downtown commercial area and Rambling River Park. Initial payment for the poles would come from the parks improvement fund and road and bridge fund. The total cost would be $28,689.75,with$11,196.00 from the parks fund and$17,493.75 from the road fund. The road fund would be paid back as projects are completed. The light fixtures and poles at Rambling River Park are twenty-three years old and need some work. The globes all need to be replaced at a cost of over$1200.00. I believe that the new poles will add to the aesthetics of the park. They will match the bridge and road lights along highway 50. The staff has reviewed this plan and agree that it can work and will add to the overall city lighting plan. J._ James Bell Parks and Recreation Director • Cost Analysis of Street Lighting Dakota Electric's standard street light installation $900.00 Brown fiberglass pole with square fixture. Residential district Acorn fixture on a Lexington Standard Columbus series $1575.00 direct set pole with spun collar. Heritage district Acorn fixture on a Lexington Standard Columbus series $3050.00 pole with a decorative collar utilizing a screw-in anchor base. Downtown commercial district unknown Two acorn fixtures on a Lexington Standard Columbus at this time series pole with a decorative collar utilizing a screw-in anchor base. • LAMP-100W/55V.150W/55V. -• \ • f CLEAR MOGUL BASED LAMPS. • • . c ) FIXTURE-70W/120V.100W/120V.OR , 4-314'CLEAR OPENING 150W/120V HPS HIGH PERFORMANCE �.�� , ACORN STYLE LUMINAIRE._TYPE a NOTE:SPUN COLLAR NOT SHOWN LIGHT DISTRIBUTION. 3'SIB r•3- -) • MULTI-VOLT 105-285)NSP MATERIAL CAST ALUMINUM HANDHOLE REINFORCEMENT ( FRAME(A356-T6)1NITH A TAPPED 318%16 HOLE SPECS.+DOE-48.FISHER PRICE MODEL FORA GROUND CONNECTOR. _ +6690B-ES638509 OAE PHOTO LAMP- 'I. UGHTPOLE SHAFT FABRICATED FROM 606344 ALLOY SEAMLESS TUBE. LIGHTPOLE ASSEMBLY IS HEAT TREATED TO T6 COND111ON AFTER WELDING. • . x 0 °f . u CAST ALUMINUM HANDHOLE REINFORCEMENT i _ cc FRAME(A356-T6)WITH A TAPPED 3/8'-16 HOLE O < FORA GROUND CONNECTOR. II I- 0 ;l COLUMBUS J • J ` • _ la THE COLOR SHALL BE PANTONE 560C(DARK GREEN) • ' HANDHOLE DETAIL pa N CJ CAST ALUMINUM HANDHOLE REINFORCEMENT FRAME 1'6'UP FROM BUTT OF POLE WITH A FULL• CIRCUMFERENCE WELD AND A 3'x 5 FLUSH o FITTING ALUMINUM DOOR ATTACHED WITH (2)1/4'-20 x 112 LG.STAINLESS STEEL = { i COUNTERSUNK SCREWS.(SEE HANDHOLE DETAIL) i c is g : ONE PIECE SPUN ALUMINUM COLLAR H (SEE PAGES 2 AND 3) „ :a SHERWIN WILLIAMS HI MILL SURE TAR EPDXY 0. _ - ON BOTTOM 4'2'OF POLE.INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. tu 0' .."----1-12'GROMMETED WIRE INLEf HOLE 2 w O Q _ . NOT TO SCALE Revisions • .0 Y iLuN. -- _ STREET LIGHT -02/24/95 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT � �� .. . .d'•sctPlatt tia. CITY OF CITY OF FARMINGTON S�-1 l FARMINGTON .ENGINEERING DEPT. • • LAMP-100W/55V, 150W/55V. CLEAR MOGUL BASED LAMPS FIXTURE-70W/120V, 100W/120V, OR f ` 150W/120V HPS HIGH PERFORMANCE • Qs ACORN STYLE LUMINAIRE. TYPE II LIGHT DISTRIBUTION -- . MULTI-VOLT(105-285) NSP MATERIAL THE COLOR SHALL BE SPECS. *DOE-48. FISHER PRICE MODEL .PANTONE 560C(DARK GREEN) *66908-ES638509 OAE PHOTO LAMP I I I • : Columbus I MIN. HANDjHOLE SIZE SHALL BE 3'X5' 14.5', 3' O.D. TENON TOP, BASE I .1 MOUNTED EXTRUDED ALUMINUM POLE I - 1 el• I 10 AMP FUSE F Electrical ccaauit SCREW IN ANCHOR BASE 60' LONG SHAFT BY 5 5/8 ' DIAMETER SLOTS FOR ," 10'-15' BOLT CIRCLE DIAMETERS 1 • dik 30 AMP FUSE - - A 3 9 1 j`_``� . . •A . 4 I•I . •.-:a • a'1 1 ..•ill /iW\\11 SPE li I•e:•j l ` i UTAH. I',i. �-1 \ AM010R +� eg ` J' s I i ROCS �_______ �.,.I l. I .. Jir,.jz * FIR-7-7---vi NOTE - A TAPERED SCREW • » • IN BASE MAY BE USED AS AN ALT. TO THE CONCRETE BASE • • =7r - IF APPROVED BY CITY ENGR •:dl BOLT 'f c: : � ��" • _ Not to Scale Revisions ail - .i STREET LIGHT . 02/24195 _ JVVK HERITAGE DISTRICT • J _,....-.. • . /[Plate Na CITY OF CITY OF FARMINGTON SL-2 FARMINGTON CMt_l11terznitt Merry' LAMP-100W/55V, 155W/55V = ` ' CLEAR MOGUL BASED LAMPS _ FIXTURE-70W/120V, 100W/120V, _ 150W/120V HPS HIGH • =' o PERFORMANCE ACORN STYLE Lam. v ( LUMINA111E.TYPE 111 LIGHT �� 1 DISTRIBUTION 30' CROSSARM, CAST ALUMINUM i • MULTI-VOLT(105-285) NSP MATERIAL THE COLOR SHALL BE SPECS. ODOE-48. FISHER PRICE MODEL PANTONE 560C(DARK GREEN) #6690B-ES638509 OAE PHOTO LAMP • • - Columbus 1 1 1 3'X5' MIN. HANDHOL= Ii BASE MOUNTED, EXTRUDED ' • - .-4 10 AMP FUSE 1 ' r' ALUMINUM POLE . . 1 3' O.D. . Electric:! ccn:uit I, SCREW IN ANCHOR BASE 80' LONG SHAFT BY 5 5/8 DIAMETER SLOTS FOR 30 AMP FUSE :LK - 10'-15' BOLT CIRCLE DIAMETERS . .. �" 'Air t'• * s . . /1 SEE a 11:-`1)-:- .•••` - •• � 1 �1 ♦� � _ �Tillf. ��� 2:b- • • �..e.. NOTE - A TAPERED SCREW • SEC t IN BASE MAY BE USED AS AN ALT. TO THE CONCRETE BASE =‘ IF APPROVED BY CITY ENGA . - ' k � •toiox • Y>ux • — _ Not to Scale . . _ - - • Revision: 1 ,-STREET LIGHT ,11 1 [ /1 �� k- DOWNTOWN DISTRICT . S��� ,, Plate Na c1TY of CITY OF FARMINGTON "st.- 4 FARMINGTON ENGINEERING DEPT.