Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.18.92 Council Packet AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR FEBRUARY 18, 1992 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. APPROVE MINUTES a. February 3, 1992 - Regular 4. CITIZENS COMMENTS 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. 7:15 P.M. - Consider Vacation of Alley - Lampert Expansion 6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Proclaim Volunteers of America Week 7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS a. Industrial Revenue Bonds - Imperial Plastics 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Project 89-9 - Storm Sewer Trunk Improvements in Section 14 b. Silver Springs Developers Agreement c. Nelsen Hills Farm Developers Agreement 9. NEW BUSINESS a. 1991 Sewage Metering Report b. Capital Improvement Fund - Fire 10. MISCELLANEOUS a. Request to Open Animal Control Contract for Proposals b. Review Agenda forPlanning Meetings of February 21st and 22nd c. April City Survey Questions d. 1992-1996 CIP 11. CONSENT AGENDA a. Wood Recycling Fees b. 1992 Manhole Rehabilitation Program c. Summer Temporary Full Time Positions - Public Works d. School/Conference Request - Parks and Recreation e. Temporary 3.2 On Sale License f. Building Inspection Mutual Aid Agreement with Rice County g. Engineering Service Fees h. School/Conference Request - Fire i. Capital Outlay Request - Fire j . School/Conference Request - Fire k. School/Conference Request - Fire 1. Resolution Approving LAWCON Funding Continuation m. Resolution Adopting Redistricting Boundaries n. Resolution Approving List of Election Judges - Presidential Primary o. School/Conference Request - Public Works p. Payment of the Bills 12. ADJOURN 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION 14. ADD ON a. Administration of Residential Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. NAME: Eugene "Babe" Kuchera DEPARTMENT: Council DATE: January 29, 1992 MEETING DATE: February 18, 1992 CATEGORY: Petitions, Requests and Communications SUBJECT: Proclaim Volunteers of America Week EXPLANATION: Self Explanatory REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Request/Proclamation REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: y-ide-4A--- 49(2"."--TURE • 1 I 7 i VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MINNESOTA 5905 Golden Valley Road • Minneapolis,MN 55422 • (612)546-3242 January 24, 1992 The Honorable Eugene Kuchera Mayor of Farmington City Hall 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Dear Mayor Kuchera: Volunteers of America Week is scheduled for March 1-8, 1992 which commemorates the founding of our organization on March 8, 1896. As one of Minnesota's and the nation's largest human service organizations, the Volunteers of America has been helping others for 96 years. I am asking you to proclaim the week in our behalf. Your personal proclamation will be encouraging to those in the Farmington community who receive care through our services. Through the years, Volunteers of America has demonstrated it is a dynamic organization, able to keep up with the everchanging world around it. Now more than ever, we recognize the constant need for developing new and more creative ways to solve problems, meet community needs, and improve the overall quality of life for all members of our society. We must continue forming partnerships, to bridge the gap between social service needs and private sector social responsibility. Your interest and support makes a significant impact on the success of our organization. And, as you know, our success is measured through the lives of those we touch. Respectfully yours, 4 /5467 ,/�° ames E. Hogie, Jr. President JEH/dc Enclosures P. S. Your proclamation, along with other proclamations and/or congratulatory letters, will be duplicated and put into booklet form. A booklet commemorating our 96th birthday will be placed in the reception area of each of our programs. 4,10, '1'1400,410A', A*01001011110041111110."‘' Office of the mayor IC" arntintJtL ut, filitutrsota ttamatto n WHEREAS, Vo!unteens o6 Ame2iea is one 06 Minnesota's and the nation's tangent human services onganLzations; and WHEREAS, VoLunteens o6 AmenLca has demonstAated its abiiLty to keep up with the evenchanging needs o6 the won-2.d anound .it; and WHEREAS, 'the City o6 Fanmington necognLzes the vatue 06 an onganAzation which pnov.ideis a wide va.'Aety 06 senv.ices to peopte negandtess 06 age, 'Lace, neUgion on background. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Counci.0 06 the City 06 Farmington decLan.es the week o6 Manch 1 thnu Manch 8, 1992 as Votunteens 06 AmeAica Week in the City o6 Farmington and encourtage the citizens 06 Farmington to expeni.ence the 6u.L6itLment that comes 640m giving and votunteening. Lin w tnele wlte.,eo[ J have &leanto Set my 1iand and caused grin ;eat to Ge affixed. AT TEST. 1/121ke DATE: Febnuexq 18, 1992 ©COPYRIGHT 1987 • MODERN PRI NYI NG CO.. 8'HAM., AL. • • y AGENDA REQUESTST FO -76 MOM Mr ITEM NO. NAME: Tom Kaldunski DEPARTMENT: Public Works DATE: February 10, 1992 MEETING DATE: February 18, 1992 CATEGORY: Consent Agenda SUBJECT= Wood Recycling Fee EXPLANATION: REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo - Tom Kaldunski REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Tom Kaldunski Public Works Ben Klotz Public Works Russ Matthys Public Works 1:441/414/ SIGNATURE • r MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL • SUBJECT: DISPOSAL OF WOOD WASTE FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1992 Staff has met to discuss the fees for utilizing the 8i cy dumpsters for the various customers. In order to accurately assess the savings of taking these materials to the demolition landfill versus the sanitary landfill, it is necessary to weigh the wastes being generated. It is proposed to weigh the containers when they are emptied to determine accurate quantities over the next month. A recommendation on the fees will be brought to the second regular Council meeting in March, which will allow time to adjust the fees for the April billing. The 8} cy dumpsters are being distributed as they arrive to implement the program as quickly as possible. Preliminary indications show that a significant savings may be available for the customers. I'm confident that a reduced fee will be implemented. Thomas J. Kaldunski Public Works Director cc: file Larry Thompson Wayne Henneke Ben Klotz Russ Matthys Dakota County Lumber Lamperts Thelen Cabinets TJK AGENDA REQUEST FORM 410 r elk ITEM NU. NAME: Ken Kuchera DEPARTMENT: Fire 2 /.' DATE: February 10. 1992 MEETING DATE: FPhrnary 1R, 19(7 CATEGORY: New Business • SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Fund EXPLANATION: RPgnPst approval to Pstahlich a Capital Tmprovement Fund for the Fire Department. '.) REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: . Memo/Correspondence - Ken Kuchera REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Ken Kuchera Fire • • Ka-v— G SIGNATURE Memo to: Mayor & Council Date February 12, 1992 Re Fire - Capital Improvement Fund Attached, you will find a memorandum from Fire Chief Kuchera requesting to establish a fire capital improvement fund. Revenues to the fund would be from revenues generated from the Fire Department's responses to vehicle incidents. The fund would provide capital to purchase new apparatus, new satellite station, and station expansion. Initially, this appeared to be a very good idea, until it was realized there are other departments that generate excess revenues from their current year operations. If authorization was given to establish the capital improvement fund for the fire department, the other departments would ask for the same consideration. This would not be feasible. The generation of excess revenues in General Fund operations is what helps increase Fund Balance - Designated for Working Capital which funds the operations of the City from January 1 - June 30. In past years, the City Council budgeted $30,000 each year to increase the City's working capital. The 1992 Budget did not allow for this increase. If the City Council would like to designate a portion of the City's increase to fund balance, which is determined during each year's financial audit, to fund space needs or large equipment purchases this would be more feasible than establishing a separate C.I.P. for each department. 0624//yLe LC4/41,7.4„4,4____ Wayne E. Henneke Finance Director c.c. Larry Thompson, City Administrator Ken Kuchera, Fire Chief Department Heads file MEMO TO: WAYNE HENNEKE SUBJECT: FIRE/RESCUE RESPONSE AND BURNING PERMIT FEES DATE: MAY 8, 1991 Several months ago, the Dakota County Chief's Association compiled the hourly charges for Fire/Rescue equipment for each community. My response to this survey was that our contracted areas are billed by percent of usage, utilizing a pre- determined formula. The residents of the City are not charged any fees. I have attached a copy of the survey as presented. I questions the value of this approach in our City. As an example, if we have a vehicle fire in the City and the vehicle is owned by a nonresident of either the City or townships, the City absorbs the cost of the response. I feel we should consider charging a predetermined hourly rate to the owner of the vehicle. Insurance companies commonly provide coverage for these types of situations. Another example: a tanker truck overturns in the City and requires Fire Department services for an extended period of time; to my knowledge we have no set hourly rate for our services. This type of accident could develop into a tremendous expense to the City. I strongly suggest that the City consider charging for Fire/Rescue response within the City in situations where the owner(s) are non- residents or property owners. I also have concerns regarding our burning permit process. The DNR has recently appointed interested fire chiefs as fire wardens. Agricultural permits can be issued by the fire warden which eliminates the need for MPCA Air Quality approval. On the average, I receive 10 requests per month which require one to two hours of my time per request to process. Several of our neighboring communities charge a minimal fee for this service. I feel we should consider charging a fee for this service as well. Perhaps it would be of value to contact surrounding communities and gather information regarding their fee structure with regard to fire/rescue response and services. Ken Kuchera Kuchera Fire Chief cc: Larry Thompson FFD Board of Directors • • • • Memo to: Mayor & Council Date : Juiy 09, 1991 Re ,:' Fire. Service Charges The firedepartmenthas pointed out that currently, the City and Townships which we contract fire service for do not bill fire service charges out to the people that use the service. The rationale behind this is that fire charges are calculated on a • formula that allocates the total cost of providing the service to the City and Townships based on usage and taxable tax capacity. This scenario works perfectly if no services are provided to people that live outsideof the fire contract area. A significant number of the calls during the year are for emergency response services. A good share of the owners of the vehicle are from outside of the coverage area and end up paying nothing for the fire service. The City or Township where the service was provided pays'the bill based on the formula. Since the City is being charged for the service received from these people, it recommended that the City charge them for the service. Cities and townships have always been able to charge the railroad for grass fires caused by trains. The Fire Department has conducted, a ' survey of rates charged by various fire departments and the average charge is $150/hour per call plus labor at the ,firelighters hourly rate. The DNR has recently appointed interested fire chiefs as fire wardens. ' Agricultural permits can be issued by the fire warden which may eliminate the need for MPCA Air Quality approval. Each request takes 1' --'2rhours to process. The Fire Chief receives an average of 10requests per ,month. The Fire Chief also issues , M.P.C.A. fire permits Which take the same amount of time to process. Currently, no fee is charged for this service. It is recommended to adopt the attached resolution• which establishes a fire services charge of $150/hour per call plus labor at the firefighters hourly rate for emergency response services provided to recipient not residing in the Farmington Fire Department coverage area. The resolution also establishes a fee of $10.00 for the processing of Agricultural and M.P.C.A. . Fire Permits. G(/ Way E. Nenneke Finance Director c.c. Larry Thompson. City Administrator Ken Kuchera. Fire Chief Karen Finstuen, Administrative Assistant Rosemary Swedin, Accountant I Arvilla Neff. Accounting Clerk ) r I • PROPOSED ' • RESOLUTION CREATING FIRE SERVICE FEES • Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 15th day of July, 1991 at. 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: The following members were absent: ' Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, fire service costs are paid by the citizens of Farmington through ad valorem taxes; and WHEREAS, non-residents who use the emergency response services of the fire department do not pay for the service provided; and • WHEREAS, agricultural fire permits and MPCA fire permits are issued by the Fire Chief; and WHEREAS, the processing of said permits take up to two hours to process and no fee is currently charged. . • NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. R1-91 be amended to include the following fire ,service fees: Emergency Response Services Provided to Recipient $150/hour/call + . Located Outside of Coverage Area labor at hourly rate Agricultural Fire Permit Processing Fee 's' '' : ` $10.00 MPCA Fire Permit Processing Fee $10.00 , • This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 15th day of July, 1991. • • • • • • AGENDA REQUEST FORM 6) ITEM NO. NAME: Larry Thompson DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: / G �i F ,v�1 9._9 2 6.b /rJ /?,92, MEETING DATE: CATEGORY: Miscellaneous -`"_ SUBJECTi = ' Planning Meeting for February 21st and 22nd EXPLANATION: Self Explanatory REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Jerry Henricks HRA Department Heads SI t MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: COUNCIL WORKSHOP DATE: JANUARY 30, 1992 I have not been able to contact Don Bargen at this time. Hopefully I will be able to make contact and come up with some suggestions for possible topics before the meeting Monday night. If you have any suggestions, please make them Monday night. 177:77z7''—s LarryThompson City Administrator cc: Department Heads AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. 110 e-° NAME: Larry Thompson DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: February 10, 1992 MEETING DATE: February 18, 1992 CATEGORY: Miscellaneous SUBJECT April Survey Questions EXPLANATION: Attached are recommended questions. REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Questions - Larry Thompson/Jerry Henricks REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Jerry Henricks HRA Department Heads CA R 7%4 r r SI ()) a i, E &.0 Yowl- czetwinerfc)19/ 016N) ' The Farmington HRA is proposing to complete two projects i th near future. ,2_,c-- �,Q 1) Build a Depot Replica/F• , ner. Mar eti i; ad.itional •arkin along 2nd Street 1:11/4: i Elm and Oak Streets ''' 'e bep•t ca wi rovide ublic meeting facilities a ace to sell produce a the Farmers Market will provide local � 3�,,, , to thee . public, as well as a place for community (such as Mt. Dew Days). i or - The exact cost of construction has not been determined. 2) Renovation/Rehabilitation of the Exchange Bank Building.--� loc ted the northwest corner of 3rd and Oak Streets. -F9SO s. he buildingr - placed �nhe National •e�istr for h s or preservation. By re . • I - - = S •; :.-- a%. t*1. • . ...___.. ,, will _..__ �- ik has not mu Again, t - • t eendetermined. �; - - - --....:_ -_ — * ' A response to the questions on the back of this survey card and any additional comments on these subjects would be appreciated. 01,E4 1) Which project�,�--r r• be a-,1priority for completion in 1992? Depot Replica/Farmers Market Exchange Bank Building 2) Would you be willing to donate your time and labor to assist in construction of the Depot Replica/Farmers Market? Yes No 3) Do you have any suggestions for possible uses of the Exchange Bank Building? Any other puj ects for the downtown area ******************************************************************************************** The City Council is considering changing the Mayor's term from 2 years to 4 years in order to provide stability to the Council. The change would not affect the present Mayor's term which expires on Dec. 31, 1992. Do you favor changing the Mayor's term from 2 years to 4 years? (Please check one.) Yes No AGENDA REQUEST FORM ( öld ITEM NO. NAME: Larry Thompson DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: February 10, 1992 MEETING DATE: February 18, 1992 CATEGORY: Miscellaneous SUBJECT: 1992-1996 CIP EXPLANATION: REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Department Heads /141EA .3712749.441 SI TUBE MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: 1992-1996 CIP DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1992 Attached, please find a memo from Wayne Henneke regarding the 1992-96 CIP. The CIP you received with the 1992 Operating Budget was a draft copy which listed possible projects. While I do not believe any of the projects were frivolous, it is obvious that the City cannot afford the equipment and projects listed unless alternate revenue resources are found. The Council began the CIP process last year by preparing a mission statement and long range goals. The process continued with prioritizing current and short range projects. Concurrently staff prepared a CIP which listed potential projects which appeared to meet Council goals. The next step the Council should take is to review the project list which you began rating last fall and the projects listed in the CIP (see attached) . Once rated, the projects will be plugged into the CIP according to priority and a financial impact analysis developed. The Council would develop the policy guidelines to assist staff in preparing a final draft document for review (eg. debt ratios, total debt levy, MSA account, balance, etc.) . I am placing this item on the February 18, 1992 Council agenda for discussion. / u Larry Thompson City Administrator LT/sm cc: 2/18/92 AGENDA Department Heads Memo to: Larry Thompson, City Administrator Date January 7, 1992 Re 1992 C.I.P. The 1992 C.I.P. has not been completed. The C.I.P. that was presented to Council with the proposed 1992 Budget was a working copy. Council needs to meet to discuss their goals and objectives for 1992 and then look at the working copy of the C.I .P. and include the items that help meet their goals and objectives. Wayne Henneke Finance Director c.c. file Page: 54 1992 BUDGET IMPACT OF CIP ON LEVIES/MILL RATE 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 BUDGET PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED GENERAL FUND REV/EXP AD VALOREM LEVIES 1,016,385 1,091,872 1,159,851 1,231,229 1,306,175 1,384,870 LOCAL GOVT AID 334,573 267,706 267,706 267,706 267,706 267,706 SUB TOTAL LEVY/LGA 1,350,958 1,359,578 1,427,557 1,498,935 1,573,881 1,652,576 OTHER REVENUES 697,042 746,654 776,520 807,581 839,884 873,480 TOTAL REVENUES 2,048,000 2,106,232 2,204,077 2,306,516 2,413,766 2,526,055 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,048,000 2,106,232 2,193,565 2,295,583 2,402,396 2,514,230 SUMMARY OF LEVY GENERAL LEVY 1,016,385 1,091,872 1,159,851 1,231,229 1,306,175 1,384,870 SPECIAL LEVI 8,620 0 0 0 0 0 DEBT LEVY 289,089 376,979 477,160 518,790 635,181 740,435 TOTAL LEVY 1,314,094 1,468,851 1,637,011 1,750,019 1,941,357 2,125,304 PERCENT INCR. 10.2% 11.8% 11.4% 6.9% 10.9% 9.5% FISCAL DISPARITIES 231,076 268,190 278,918 290,074 301,677 313,744 HOMESTEAD CREDIT 387,318 414,160 455,576 501,134 551,247 606,372 ADJUSTED LEVY 695,700 786,501 902,517 958,811 1,088,433 1,205,188 TAXABLE TAX CAPACITY 2,525,411 2,540,499 2,701,079 2,701,079 2,701,079 2,701,079 PROJECTED TAX CAP. RATE 0.27548 0.30959 0.33413 0.35497 0.40296 0.44619 SUMMARY OF LEVY GENERAL LEVY 77.34% 74.34% 70.85% 70.36% 67.28% 65.16% SPECIAL LEVI 0.66% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% DEBT LEVY 22.00% 25.66% 29.15% 29.64% 32.72% 34.84% TOTAL LEVY 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Page: 48 1992 OPERATING BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL COST 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 MULTI-YEAR EQUIP. TRACTOR & FLAIL MOWER 30,000 0 UNDER BODY PLOW 9,000 0 0 0 4WD PICKUP 15,000 15,000 FRONT END LOADER 75,000 75,000 SKID STEER 28,000 28,000 SNOW PLOWS 22,500 0 7,500 0 7,500 0 SANDERS 10,500 0 3,500 0 3,500 0 MILLING UNIT - BOBCAT 7,000 7,000 PUMPER REPLACEMENT 450,000 250,000 250,000 PAGERS 20,000 20,000 1 TON DUMP 20,000 20,000 0 PICKUP 36,000 0 18,000 PACKER TRUCKS 180,000 90,000 90,000 RECYCLING TRUCK 50,000 50,000 FRONT LOADER (COMM) 100,000 100,000 SEWER JETTER 100,000 100,000 TANDEM TRUCK 100,000 50,000 50,000 TOTAL MULTI-YEAR EQUIPMENT 1,253,000 270,000 158,000 15,000 244,000 548,000 Page: 55 • 1992 CIP SUMMARY OF PROJECTS 1992 - 1996 GEN.FUND PAGE TOTAL OPERATING USER ANNUAL YEAR PROJECT /1 COST BUDGET FEDERAL STATE FEES ASSESSED AD VALOREM ADVALOREM 1992 DEVELOP - PINE KNOLL PARK 4,000 4,000 1992 DEVELOP - FAIRHILLS PARK ('92-'93) 9,000 6,000 1992 PLAYGROUND EQUIP. - BALLFIELDS 5,000 5,000 1992 TRAIL SYSTEM ('92-194) 210,000 35,000 1992 ARENA - BOARD REPLACEMENT ('92-'95) 50,000 10,000 1992 FIRE STATION EXPANSION 70,000 70,000 9,511 1992 COUNCIL ROOM RELOCATION 0 0 1992 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS STREETS 563,287 343,606 219,681 29,848 STORM SEWER 164,687 73,064 91,623 0 SANITARY SEWER 97,595 63,437 34,158 0 1992 OAK STREET - 1ST ST. TO RAILROAD STREETS 89,614 31,365 58,249 7,914 STORM SEWER 31,546 20,505 11,041 0 SEWER 32,531 21,145 11,386 0 WATER 23,986 15,591 8,395 0 1992 ELM PARK IMPROVEMENTS STREETS 270,043 270,043 STORM SEWER 89,568 89,568 1992 CR64 FROM CSAH31 - FAIRHILLS 84,274 84,274 1992 3RD STREET OVERLAY 79,615 79,615 1992 S.E. AREA STORM SEWER 1,241,851 $108,300/yr 1992 SLIPLINE ELM ST. - 1ST TO TH3 155,848 155,848 1992 SLIPLINE 3RD ST. - ASH TO BEECH ST. 44,528 44,528 1992 SLIPLINE ALLEY S. OF BEECH TO L/S 30,360 30,360 TOTALS - 1992 15,000 124,143 119,274 389,950 891,185 347,930 47,273 1993 DEVELOP - FAIRHILLS PARK C'92-193) 9,000 3,000 1993 RESTROOMS - R.R. BALLFIELDS 35,000 35,000 1993 TRAIL SYSTEM ('92-'94) 210,000 105,000 35,000 1993 ARENA - BOARD REPLACEMENT ('92-'95) 50,000 10,000 1993 PAVE PUBLIC WORKS YARD 10,000 10,000 1993 DAKOTA COUNTY ESTATE - TRAIL 7,000 7,000 1993 SATELITE FIRE STATION 350,000 350,000 47,554 1993 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS STREETS 704,263 402,442 246,492 55,329 7,517 STORM SEWER 81,959 39,955 13,318 28,686 SANITARY SEWER 109,372 71,092 38,280 WATER 120,615 78,400 42,215 1993 CR74 FROM R.R. TO TH3 405,763 405,763 TOTALS - 1993 55,000 105,000 883,160 172,810 355,673 405,329 55,071 Page: 56 GEN.FUND PAGE TOTAL OPERATING USER ANNUAL YEAR PROJECT # COST BUDGET FEDERAL STATE FEES ASSESSED AD VALOREM ADVALOREM 1994 POOL RESTORATION ('94-'95) 50,000 25,000 1994 WINDOWS - CITY HALL 6,000 6,000 1994 TRAIL SYSTEM ('92-'94) 210,000 35,000 1994 ARENA - BOARD REPLACEMENT ('92-'95) 50,000 15,000 1994 REMODEL CITY HALL 5,000 5,000 1994 SALT ENCLOSURE 10,000 10,000 1994 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS STREETS 402,442 140,855 261,587 35,541 STORM SEWER 81,635 53,063 28,572 SANITARY SEWER 109,372 71,092 38,280 WATER 38,444 24,989 13,455 1994 CR64 - CR31 TO TH3 180,408 180,408 1994 PINE KNOLL IMPROVEMENTS 1,303,235 456,132 847,103 115,094 1994 WATER RESERVOIR 2,016,995 183,055/YR TOTALS -1994 81,000 0 180,408 164,144 677,294 1,108,690 150,635 1995 POOL RESTORATION ('94-'95) 50,000 25,000 1995 SKATING COMPLEX(MIDDLE SCHOOL AREA) 100,000 100,000 13,587 1995 ARENA - BOARD REPLACEMENT ('92-'95) 50,000 15,000 1995 CITY HALL SPRINKLING SYSTEM 3,500 3,500 1995 LIQUOR STORE 85,000 $13,000/YR 1995 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE 750,000 $47,000/yr 210,000 28,532 1995 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS STREETS 402,442 140,855 261,587 35,541 STORM SEWER 81,959 53,273 28,686 SANITARY SEWER 158,169 102,810 55,359 WATER 34,511 34,511 TOTALS - 1995 28,500 0 0 205,594 224,900 571,587 77,660 1996 BALLFIELD COMPLEX 850,000 850,000 74,107 1996 ARENA ADDITION - TEAM ROOMS 70,000 $10,000/YR 1996 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS STREETS 563,849 197,347 366,502 49,796 STORM SEWER 81,959 53,273 28,686 1996 ESSEX AVENUE 2,951,000 2,951,000 TOTALS - 1996 0 0 2,951,000 53,273 226,033 1,216,502 123,903 CITY ... 1. Build upon its past by affirming and reinforcing its strengths, and acknowledging and pro-actively dealing with its weaknesses. 2. Strive to maintain its own unique image based on small town values, while managing growth. -- 3. Assist in providing a wide range of social and economic opportunities efficiently and cost effectively. 4. Seek to be future oriented and open to progressive ideas. 5. Preserve the historic core while recognizing the need to plan for and establish a new commercial center capable of servicing future growth. 6. Establish an environment which provides for and encourages open communication with its citizens, and to respect the needs of citizens to learn, be heard and contribute. 7. Plan, provide and maintain infrastructure and City services to accommodate growth in an efficient, cost effective manner, while recognizing economic limitations. 8. Provide a variety of recreational and social opportunities linked by a comprehensive trail system. 9. Recognize that the need to preserve the environment and the need for development should be balanced. 10. Plan and encourage the development of a wide variety of housing opportunities based on needs ranging from high density, low-moderate income to low density, high income. 11. Plan and encourage the development if a wide variety of land uses from con- servation land to industrial while recognizing the value of agriculture. 12. Recognize that the Farmington community extends beyond the geographic boundaries of the City. WORK PLACE ... 1. Above all, employees should serve as ambassadors of the City with pride, and be dedicated to carrying out the vision and principles of the City Council. 2. Encourage employees to possess high standards and values, to accept responsibility for their actions, stretch their capabilities while recognizing limitations. 3. Encourage employees to openly communicate with each other in a constructive way, support each other and encourage team work between departments. 4. Give and receive direct, supportive and timely feedback. 5. Provide employees the opportunity to learn, be heard and contribute. 6. Encourage employee innovation and enthusiasm for change. • CITY OF FARMINGTON ON GOING/FUTURE PROJECTS Prepared by Larry Thompson - 9/11/91 Updated - 9/20/91 Updated - 9/24/91 Updated - 9/30/91 A. City Improvement Projects 1. Southeast Area Storm Sewer (A) 2. Second Street Parking (B) 3. Spruce Street Improvement (A) 4. Middle School/Pine Street (B) 5. Elm Park/First Street (B) 6. Sidewalk Improvements (B) 7. Sanitary Sewer Study/MPCA Loan (B) 8. MSA - Essex Avenue - North/South of 195th Street (A) 9. Hill Dee/Hillview Storm Sewer Project (B) 10. Lunch Room (B) B. HRA/EDC Projects 1. Elm Park (A) 2. Oak Senior (B) 3. Exchange Bank (A) 4. McVicker (C) 5. Farmington Green (B) 6. Star City (B) 7. FAA Expansion/Ballfields (B) 8. Farmington Ford (B) 9. Industrial Park - Industry Recruitment (A) 10. Second Street Parking/Loggia/Depot Replica (A) C. Park Projects 1. Pine Knoll (A) 2. Farmington Preserve/Trail (A) 3. Evergreen Knoll Picnic Shelter (A) 4. Fair Hills (B) 5. Complete East Side of Celebrate Minnesota 1990 (Bury overhead cable) (B) 6. Ballfield Lights (B) 7. Dakota County Estates Trail - CSAH #31 (A) D. Plats • 1. Middle School (A) 2. Silver Springs (B) 3. Akin Park Estates II (A) E. Policies/General Projects 1. City/Township Concerns 2. 1992 Compensation 3. Compensatory Time 4. Mission Statement/Work Program 5. Part Time Salary Plan 6. Master CIP 7. Mineral Extraction/Grading Ordinance 8. Improvement/Design Standards 9. Budget 10. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 11. Training Program 12. Employee Incentives 13. Duties/Responsibilities 14. Odd/Even Parking (Snow Removal) 15. Space Needs (City Wide) 16. Sidewalk Plan Revision 17. Revise Assessment Policy - Arterial Roads/Housekeeping 18. DARE Program 19. Fair Parking 20. GIS System F. Utilities 1. Resource Recovery Facility 2. Weight Based System 3. Fall Clean Up Day 4. Automated Commercial Collection 5. Water Meters 6. Water Reservoir G. Future 1. 1992 Street Improvement Project 2. Ash Street Upgrade 3. 195th Street 4. Essex Avenue 5. Housing Revitalization Program (Richfield Model) 6. 1992 Sidewalks 7. Enhance Communication * a. Public b. Employees c. Council d. Boards and Commissions e. School District 8. MSA/FAU a. Traffic Lights - 3rd and Elm Street b. Traffic Lights - TH 50 and CSAH 31 c. 4th Street Improvement d. 195th Street - Plans and Specifications e. Essex Avenue - Plans and Specifications f. TH 3 Storm Sewer Crossing 9. Street Lighting Policy 10. Alley Improvement 11. Revise/Review City Code 12. Microfiche Records * Need to identify specific programs;• for example, surveys, Cable TV, neighborhood meetings, outreach, periodic meetings and so on. • AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. NAME: Larry Thompson DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: February 5, 1992 MEETING DATE: February 18, 1992 CATEGORY: Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Approve the Building Inspection Mutual Aid Agreement with Rice County EXPLANATION: Per Rice County request REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo/Agreement - Larry Thompson REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Karen Finstuen Administration John Manke Administration MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES - RICE COUNTY DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1992 The Rice County Planning Department recently lost both building inspectors and are now without a building inspector. They are actively soliciting services from various jurisdictions to assist them until a building inspector is hired. John Manke has indicated that he should be able to fit the limited number of inspections within his schedule. Therefore, I am tentatively agreeing to the terms outlined in the attached agreement, which is based on the agreement presently in place with Rosemount. If anyone disagrees with this arrangement, please contact me as soon as possible. I will place formal approval of the agreement on the February 18th Council agenda. 0/4 Larry Thomps n City Administrator cc: Karen Finstuen John Manke Dave Harmeyer file A MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT FOR BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of , 1992, by and between the City of Farmington and Rice County, each a Minnesota municipal corporation. That in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements and undertakings herein- after set forth, each of the parties hereto agree to furnish building inspection services to the other party when called upon by the Administrator or his designee, subject to the following: I. Definition: Administrator - The chief administrative officer as appointed by the City Council or County Board. II. . Conditions: 1) This Agreement is applicable to inspection services only and excludes any services required for plan review and permit issuance required under each jurisdiction's ordinances and codes. 2) If for any reason or event, the Administrator or his designee decides that no building inspectors can be spared, that decision shall be final in such matters and no party hereto shall be liable in any way to any other party or to any other person, firm or corporation for failure of the inspector of said jurisdiction to make such inspections. 3) The party requesting assistance shall pay the party providing assistance at a rate of $25.00 per hour. 4) That the party requesting and receiving assistance for the other party hereto shall not be held liable for any damage, injuries or losses to persons or property arising out of the act or failure to act of the party providing assistance. 4) This Agreement shall be in effect upon approval and execution of this Agreement by both. parties. The Agreement shall remain in effect until terminated by either party after giving 30 days written notice to the other party. CITY OF FARMINGTON RICE COUNTY Mayor City Administrator AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. 11 NAME: Tom Kaldunski DEPARTMENT: Engineering C:/11 DATE: February 4, 1992 '11 / ' MEETING DATE: February 18, 1992 CATEGORY: Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Engineering Service Fee EXPLANATION: Fee for Engineering Intern position. REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo/Resolution - Russ Matthys REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration Wayne Henneke Finance Tom Kaldunski Public Works J ' SIGNA :';+' MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUBJECT: ENGINEERING SERVICES FEE - ENGINEERING INTERN DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1992 Due to the approval of the engineering intern position, an engineering service fee should be established for this position. It is recommended that this fee should be set at $18.00/hour. Council approval is requested for this fee. A proposed resolution amending the 1992 Fees and Charges resolution is attached. uss Ca51‘71,.L2 Russ Matthys Assistant City Engineer cc: Tom Kaldunski Wayne Henneke Larry Thompson tr OrPROPOSED V-jjiA RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. R4-92 — ENGINEERING SERVICE FEES Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City on the 18th day of February, 1992 at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: The following members were absent: Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R4-92, the City Council established fees and charges for Engineering Services for 1992; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that such fees need to be established for the Engineering Intern position. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Engineering Services Fees shall be be amended by adding the Engineering Intern position at $18.00 per hour effective with the hiring of the Engineering Intern. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 18th day of February, 1992. Street/Curb Breaking Min. $200 deposit + $40 inspection fee on lg. projects. Unused balance refunded. Engineering Services Engineer - -- $55/hour Assistant Engineer $33/hour Engineer Tech $22/hour Secretary/Clerk Typist $20/hour eNGiNEER'ING /►�T2N /B/Nou-2 Projects Feasibility Report 2% of Est. Const. Costs Plans, Specs, Bidding 5% of Est. Const. Costs Staking, Insp. , Supr. 5% of Actual Const. Costs (Total Engineering Not to Exceed 12% of Actual Const. Costs.) Current Services - 1 hr. min. Personnel Public Works Dir./Engineer $55/hour St. and Utility Foreman $39/hour Maint. II $32/hour Maint. I $31/hour Equipment Services * Pick Up Truck $41/hour 5 yd. Dump Truck $46/hour Sewer Rodding Machine $57/hour Road Patrol (Grader) $57/hour Ind. Ford. Tractor (backhoe +/- loader) $57/hour Stre t Sweeper $72/hour Air compressor, Hammer, Hose $57/hour Compacting Tamper $36/hour Trash Pump $31/hour Paint Striper $52/hour * The minimum charge for use of City equipment will be 1 hour at Standard Rate. The standard rate includes operator fees. All City equipment must be operated by City employees. MISCELLANEOUS _ AMOUNT Ag Preserve Filing $50 Candidate Filing $2 Street/Curb Benefit Chg. See assessment roll Utility Const. Fee $40 Parkland Cont. Land Money Parkland in Zones R-1 thru R-4 10% $400/unit Parkland in Commercial/Industrial 5% $250/acre in plat Trail Fee $100/unit AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM NO. )(411a. NAME: Larry Thompson DEPARTMENT: Administration DATE: February 13, 1992 / MEETING DATE: February 18, 1992 CATEGORY: Add On SUBJECT Residential Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program - HRA Administration EXPLANATION: REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo - Larry Thompson REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT: Larry Thompson Administration HRA Members Jerry Henricks HRA j12 ‘ 4/76444RE 'd MEMO TO: JERRY HENRICKS SUBJECT: HRA QUESTIONS DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1992 The following is a response to your memo dated February 13, 1992. 1. The 1983 TIF Housing District consists of scattered sites in Dakota County Estates and Whispering River. 2. There are no future Farmington CDBG entitlement funds dedicated to the project at this time. 3. This question would be more appropriately addressed by the City Council. I will place it on the February 18, 1992 agenda for discussion. If you or the HRA have any questions, or wish to have this matter addressed at a future HRA meeting, please contact me. /a-7 .*':%J7e4. Larry Thompso City Administrator cc: HRA Members Mayor and Council file MEMO TO: LARRY THOMPSON SUBJECT: HRA QUESTIONS DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1992 At the February 5, 1992 HRA meeting several questions were raised by members of the HRA board about the Residential Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program the City Council entered into with Dakota County HRA. The following are three questions the board had: 1. Where is the 1983 TIF Housing District, is it located within the downtown redevelopment district? If it is the downtown redevelopment district, will these dedicated funds for the "Residential Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation program" from the old district be future funds from the district. 2. Will future (1993 and 1995) Community Development Block Grant funds be dedicated to this program or could the 1993 and 1995 CDBG funds still be used by the HRA on other projects, if appropriate. 3. The HRA requests the opportunity to review this program determining if this would be a program they could administer. Would the Council allow the HRA the opportunity to review the program to determine whether or not the HRA would accept or reject the administration of this program. kg:47.07d1 *_49:4,4dA) Gerald A. Henricks HRA Executive Director cc: HRA members file GAH