Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.12.92 Special Council Packet AGENDA COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT MEETING MAY 12, 1992 8:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. DISCUSSION TOPICS a. Low Density Residential b. High Density Residential c. Architectural Standards d. Garage/Storage Facilities e. PUD - Permitted/Conditional Uses f. Notification Requirements g. Growth Issues h. Overall Land Use Plan i. Goals and Objectives j. Permit Process 4. WRAP UP - SUMMARY 5. SET FUTURE MEETING 6. ADJOURN Summary Report to Follow MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION SUBJECT: JOINT MEETING AGENDA DATE: MAY 12, 1992 The following is a very brief summary of the topics listed on the proposed May 12th . joint meeting agenda. I do not think it would be possible to cover all of the topics in depth. Therefore, it should be decided if you wish to superficially address all topics or select 3-4 issues that should be discussed in depth. Low Density Housing This topic addresses "estate" platting of 3+ acres and, if agreeable, which areas of the City would be acceptable for such development. "Ghost platting", whereby future layout of streets, utilities, lots and so on are planned for in conjunction with the estate plat, should also be discussed along with this topic. High Density Residential It was indicated the Council should set aside specific areas for high density residential. Architectural Standards This topic has been discussed off and on during my tenure with the City. In essence, the standards would relate to style (roof overhang, roof pitch, etc.) , size (square footage and bulk) , siding, stories, facade, etc. The issue is especially pertinent in light of the request by Francis Blaha to move a metal building into the central business district. Garage/Storage Facilities This issue is becoming extremely critical due to increased rent for storage, coupled with families acquiring boats, additional vehicles and so on. I believe this issue receives the most comment and concern from neighbors and applicants. PUD - Permitted/Conditional Use PUDs presently allow a number of housing types within a single district. Rather than delineating between single family, townhouses, duplexes, quads, apartments, and so on, the process focuses on land use densities. This apparently runs counter to the feelings of some members, whereby it is felt specific areas should be set aside beforehand for high density residential. Notification Requirements The City presently requires an abstractor's certificate of owners within 350' for conditional use permits, rezones and subdivisions. The list is optional for variances. Jerry Ristow recently questioned the requirement of an abstractor's certificate ($250 to $350) and suggested staff prepare the list. Growth Issues This issue deals mainly with the coordination of growth between the City and surrounding jurisdictions. Overall Land Use This is a continuation of our discussion on the overall land use plan to be included in the revised City's Comprehensive Plan. Goals and Objectives This is a continuation of the City's goals and objectives process, including the goals and objectives to be included in the Comprehensive Plan. Permit Process The City constantly tries to balance code requirements with individual construction timelines. While the legal requirements are not compromised, individuals are allowed to begin the permitting process without all of the information available. While this policy works most of the time, it has lead to some hard feelings when it is determined that a permit is not allowed once all of the information has been obtained. In addition, it has been suggested that the City's overall sidewalk plan be considered. Again, it is not realistic that all of the above issues be resolved at this meeting, it is hoped that the issues that are most important to the Council and the Planning Commission can be addressed and direction given to staff to begin working on them. Larry Thompson City Administrator cc: Development Committee file LT/mh