HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.20.92 Council Packet AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR
JULY 20, 1992
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVE AGENDA
3. APPROVE MINUTES
a. July 6, 1992 - Regular
4. CITIZENS COMMENTS
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. Set Public Hearing - Proposed Middle School Athletic Field Grading Permit
b. 7:30 P.M. - Vacation of Alley, Block 3 - Greenway Addition
c. 7:30 P.M. - Ordinance Amending 2-10-11 - Street Tree Species
6. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
a. Water Utility Ordinance Revision
b. Resolution Relating to Developers Agreement - FAA Locust Street Improvement
c. Ordinance Amending Mandatory Garbage Ordinance
d. Resolution Establishing Terms and Conditions for Sale of G.O. Improvement Bonds
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
10. MISCELLANEOUS
a. Heritage Preservation Commission
11. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Approve Payment Estimate - Project No. 91-10
b. Approve Payment - Project 92-1
c. Approve Equipment Purchase - Hydraulic Floor Jack - PULL
d. Approve Equipment Purchase - Gas Monitoring Device - PULL
e. Approve Equipment Purchase - Magnetic Locator - PULL
f. Approve Equipment Purchase - 90 Gallon Containers
g. Resolution Accepting Petition for Annexation - Robert Adelmann
h. Adopt Supplement #2 to Existing CDBG Cooperation Agreement
i. Adopt Resolution Approving Silver Springs 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat and
Developers Agreement
j. Approve Design Center Study of Farmington and Funding
k. Resolution Approving Gambling Premise Permit Application - St. Michaels Church
1. Ordinance Amending Dog Ordinance
m. Resolution Amending Resolution No. R4-92 - Dog Licensing Fees
n. Building Permit Expiration Dates
o. Project No. 92-16 - Dakota County Estates 7th Addition - Approve Plans and
Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids
p. Preliminary Metropolitan Council Population Forecast
q. Approve School/Conference Requests - Arena/Parks and Recreation
r. Approve Assessment Agreement - Schreiners.
s. Approve Payment of the Bills
12. ADJOURN
13. ADD ON
a. Approve Resolution Acquiring Property for Parkland
.11441111
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
IT NO. 5(1
6/,;i
NAME: Charles Tooker
DEPARTMENT: Administration CI)ic 1)
DATE: July 8, 1992 67(-51-+-
/- •�/ r6a,
MEETING DATE: July 20, 1992 ,
CATEGORY: Public Hearings
SUBJECT: 7:30 P.M. - Public Hearing to Amend Allowable Street Tree Species
EXPLANATION: Discussing an ordinance which will amend the allowable street
tree species in Farmington to include those desirable tree species that are
readily available to local nurseries. The existing list was found to be
difficult to follow in eight out of thirty-seven species.
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Sent previously.
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Karen Finstuen Administration
Tom Kaldunski Public Works
Jim Bell Parks and Recreation
Charlie Tooker Administration
ae,th lieLk°
SIGNATURE
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. JO 04.--d
NAME: Larry Thompson
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: June 24, 1992
MEETING DATE: July 20, 1992
CATEGORY: Miscellaneous
SUBJECT: Heritage Preservation Commission
EXPLANATION: Per discussion at the June 22, 1992 meeting.
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo - Larry Thompson
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson
Development Comittee
I/
SIGNATURE
Heritage Preservation Commission
The group of people interested in the Exchange Bank Building have met to discuss
the future of the building. We would like to approach the Farmington City Council
to appoint and acknowledge the formation of the Heritage Preservation Commission.
Heritage Preservation Commissions are established by local ordinance enacted under
State enabling legislation (M.S. 471. 193) . Such an ordinance creates a commission
of local residents who recommend local designation of historic properties to the
City Council, review proposed changes to designated properties, and many also work
with other local agencies to create incentive programs for historic properties.
Heritage Preservation Commissions may apply to the State Historic Preservation
Office to become certified Local Government CLGs. CLG designation qualifies the
City to apply to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for federal matching
grants for survey and planning work.
Other possible responsibilities and projects for the HPC include:
- review of building and demolition permits on designated properties
- conduct incentive and public education activities about historical properties
- historic festivals and publications.
It is recommended by the SHPO that one City Council member and the City Attorney
fill spots on this Commission as well as 5 to 6 interested City residents.
Attached is a copy of Stillwater's ordinance which is an example of many others
that are available from various cities in the State of Minnesota and other cities
across the United States.
•
•
I
ORDINANCE NO. 664
• AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING CHAPTER 22, _
OF THE STILLWATER CITY CODE
BY REPEALING SECTION 22.10, SUBDIVISIONS 1-8
AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW SECTION 22.10
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1 . REPEALING. Sec- political, visual or archi-
tion 22. 10. HERITAGE PRESERVA- tectural history;
TION COMMISSION, Subdivisions
1 -8 of the Stillwater City (2) Protect and enhance
Code, is hereby repealed in its the City of Stillwater' s
entirety. appeal . and attraction to
residents, visitors and
Section 2. ADOPTING. A new tourists, and serve as a
Section 22.10 is hereby added support and stimulus to
to the Stillwater City Code business and industry;
that shall hereafter read as
follows: (3 ) Enhance the visual and
aesthetic character, diver-
"22.10. HERITAGE PRESERVATION sity and interest of the
COMMISSION. City of. Stillwater;
Subdivision 1 . DECLARATION ( 4) Foster civic pride in
OF PUBLIC POLICY AND PURPOSE. the beauty and notable ac-
The Council of the City of complishments of the past;
Stillwater hereby declares as and
a matter of public policy
that the preservation, pro- (5) Promote the preserva-
tection, perpetuation and use tion and continued use of
of areas , places , buildings , historic sites and struc-
structures , and other objects tures for the education and
having a special historical, general welfare of the peo-
community or aesthetic inter- pie of the City of
est or value is a public ne- Stillwater.
cessity and is required in -
the interest of the health, Subd. 2. DEFINITIONS. As
prosperity, safety and wel- used herein, "Heritage Pres-
fare of the community. The ervation Site" shall mean any
purposes of this chapter are area, place, building, struc-
to: tura, lands, districts, or
other objects which have been
( 1 ) Safeguard the heritage duly designated Heritage
of the City of Stillwater Preservation Sites pursuant
by preserving sites and to Subd. 4( 7) of this Chapter
structures which reflect 22.10.
�
elements of the City' s cul- • , -
tural, social, economic,
.
Subd. 3. HERITAGE PRESERVA- mission shall make such by-
TION COMMISSION ESTABLISHED. laws as it may deem advis-.
able and necessary for the
(1 ) Members. There is conduct of its affairs, for-
: hereby created and estab- the purpose of carrying out
lished a City of Stillwater the intent of this ordi-
Heritage Preservation Com- nance, which are not incon-
mission, hereinafter the sistent with the laws of
"Commission," which shall the City of Stillwater and
•
consist of seven (7) voting the State of . Minnesota.
members to be appointed by The Commission shall make
the mayor, by and with the an annual report, contain-
advise and consent of the ing a statement of its ac-
City Council. The Chairman tivities and plans to the
of the Stillwater Planning City Council.
Commission or his designee
and the City Planner of the ( 4) Program Assistance.
City. of Stillwater shall be To accomplish the intent
ex-officio non-voting mem- and purpose of this ordi-
bers of the Commission. nance, the City of
Stillwater shall provide
( 2) Term. The mayor and the Commission with staff
council shall initially support, including employ-
designate two appointees to ees of the City library
serve a term of one year, staff acquainted with the
three appointees to serve a historical archives and
term of .two years , and files, to perform the dut-
three appointees to serve a ies prescribed under this
terms of three years. All ordinance.. •
subsequent appointments
shall be for a term of Subd. 4. DESIGNATION OF
three years. Members may HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITES.
be reappointed for consecu-
tive terms. In the event ( 1 ) Reports. The City
of a vacancy, the vacancy Council, upon request of
for the unexpired term the Commission, may direct
shall be filled in the same the City staff to prepare
manner as the appointment' studies which catalog
is made. Members shall buildings, land, areas,
serve without compensation districts, or other objects
and shall continue to holo to be considered for desig-
office until their succes- nation as a Heritage Pres-
sors have been appointed. ervation Site.
( 3 ) Orcanization. The ( 2) Criteria. The Commis-
commission when formed sion shall recommend to the
shall elect from its mem- City Council areas, build-
bers , such officers as it ings, districts or objects
may deem necessary. The to be designated Heritage
1e
Commission shall have the Preservation Sites.
power to -designate and ap- considering the designation.
potrt from its members var of Heritage Preservation
icu., r'o;nTittees. The Ccm- Sites, the Commission'
shall apply the following (3) Planning Commission
- criteria: review. The Commission
shall advise the City-Plan-
(a) Its character, in- ning Commission of the_ pro-
terest or value as part posed designation of a Her-
of the development heri- itage Preservation Site,
tage or cultural charac- including boundaries, and a
teristics of the City of program for the preserva-
Stillwater, State of tion of a Heritage Preser-
Minnesota or the United vation Site, and secure
States. from the City Planning Com-
mission its recommendation
(b) Its location as a with respect to the rela-
site of significant his- tionship of the proposed
toric event. heritage preservation des-
ignation to the Comprehen-
(c) Its identification sive Plan of the City of
with a person or persons Stillwater, and its opin-
who significantly . con- ion as to the effect of the
tributed to the culture proposed designation upon
and development of the the surrounding neighbor-
City of Stillwater. hood and any other planning
consideration which may be
(d) Its embodiment of relevant to the proposed
distinguishing character- designation. The Planning
istics of an architectur- Commission shall also give
al style, period, form or its recommendation of ap-
treatment. proval, rejection or modi-
fication of the proposed
(e) Its identification designation. The recommen-
as work of an architect dation shall become part of
or master builder whose the official record con-
individual work has in- cerning the proposed desig-
fluenced the development nation and shall be submit-
of the City of ted by the Commission along
Stillwater. with its recommendation
concerning the proposed
(f) Its embodiment of ' designation to the City
elements of architectural Council. The Commission
design, detail, materi- may make such modifica-
als, or craftsmanship tions, changes and altera-
which represent a signif- tions concerning the pro-
icant architectural inno- posed designation as it
vation. deems necessary in consid-
eration of the recommenda-
(g) Its unique location tions of the City Planning
or singular physical Commission.
characteristic represent-
ing an established and ( 4) Communications with
familiar visual feature State titcrical Society.
of a neighborhood, cc.:.mu- A coon _= the Commission' s
nity, or the City of proposed designation . of a
Stillwater. Heritage Preservation Site,
including boundaries, and a ervation of the site.
program for the preserva- .
tion of a Heritgage Preser- (7) Council designation,
vation Site shall be sent Hearings. The City Coun-
• to the state Historical cil, upon the request of
Society in accordance with the Commission, may by or-
Minnesota Statutes. dinance designate a Heri-
tage Preservation Site.
(5) Hearings. Prior to Prior to such designation
the Commission recommending the City Council or one of
to the City Council any its committees shall hold
building, district, or ob- public hearings . notice of
ject for designation as a which shall be published in
Heritage Preservation Site, a newspaper' of general cir-
the Commission shall hold a culation at least thirty
public hearing and seek the ( 30) days prior to the date
recommendations of all con- of the hearing, and notice
cerned citizens. Prior to of the hearing shall be
such hearing the Commission sent to all owners of pro-
shall cause to be published perty shich is proposed to
in a newspaper of general be designated a Heritage
circulation notice of the Preservation Site and to
hearing at least thirty all property owners within
(30) days prior to the date three hundred (300) feet of
of the hearing, and notice the boundary of the area to
of the hearing shall be be designated a Heritage
sent to all owners of the Preservation Site.
property proposed to be
designated a Historic Pres- (8) Eminent Domain. The
ervation Site and to all Commission may recommend to
property owners within the City Council after re-
three hundred (300) feet of view and comment by the
the boundary of the area to City Planning Commission.,
be designated a Historic that certain property eli-
Preservation Site. gible for designation as a
Heritage Preservation Site
(6) Findings and recommen- be acquired by gift, nego-
dations. The Commission ' tiation or by eminent do-
shail determine if the pro- main as provided for in
posed Heritage Preservation_ _ Chapter 117 of Minnesota
Site is eligible for Heri- Statutes.
tage Preservation as deter-
mined by the criteria spec- Subd. 5. ADDITIONAL POWERS
ified in Paragraph ( 2) of AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION.
this subdivision, and if The Commission shall have the
the Commission recommends following powers and duties
to the City Council that in addition to those other-
the site be designated for wise specified in this chap-
heritage preservation, the ter:
Commission shall transmit
to the City Council with ( 1 ) The Commission . shall .
its recommendation its arc- conduct a continuing survey
pc_ec trccram or the ores- of all. awes , ..-.._z- ►
•
buildings, structures, or of the City of Stillwater.
objects in the City of ( 5) The Commission may on
' Stillwater which the Com- a continuing basis collect
mission, on the basis of nd review certain city
information available or alannin and development
, . presented to it, has reason planning
to believe are significant records, documents, stud-
• to the culture, social, ies , models, maps, plans ,
economic, political, or ar- and drawings to be entered
chitectural history of the into the Public Library
City of Stillwater. Historical Archives as a
permanent record of city
( 2) The Commission shall history and development.
continually survey all ( 6) The Commission shall
areas to determine needed
and desirable improvements make no application to the
of older buildings through- National Register or to the
out Stillwater, acting in a State of Minnesota for the
resource and advisory cepa- designation of a historic
city to owners of histori- site or district without
cally significant sites re- the consent of the City
garding their preservation, Council..
restoration and rehabilita-
tion.
Subd. 6. REVIEW OF PERMITS.
( 3 ) The Commission shall ( 1 ) Site Alteration Permit.
work for the continuing The Commission shall review
education of the citizens and recommend approval or
of the City of Stillwater disapproval of the issuance
with respect to the civic of a Site Alteration Permit
and architectural heritage to do any of the following
of the city. It shall keep in a Heritage Preservation
current a public register Site in the City of
of designated and proposed Stillwater. The applica-
Heritage
tion shall be accompanied
Heritage Preservation Sites by detailed plans including
plans and programs that ,
and areas along with the aplan,lan, building ele-
vations and design details
pertain to them.
and materials as necessary
4 The Commission may re- - to evaluate the request.
( ) Besides the Site Alteration
commend to the �ity the ac- Permit the regular city
ceptance of gifts and con- shall be required.
tributions to be made to permits
•
the City and to assist the (a) Remodel, alter or
City staff in the prepare- repair in any manner,eluding paint in-
grant funds to be made
tion of applications for color that
through the City for the will change the exterior
purpose of Heritage ?reser- appearance of a historic
e- building or in a site.
vation. Any contributions
or gifts will be expanded. . •
-
in the manner provided (b) New construction
throuch the fiscal policy
•
•
(c) Signs tinctive architectural
features should be avoid-
•
(d) Moving of buildings ed when possible.
(e) Demolition in whole (c) All buildings,
or in part. This does structures, and sites
not apply to structures shall be recognized as
required to be demolished products of their own
in accordance with time. Alterations that
Minnesota Statutes, have no historical basis
Chapter 463. and which seek to create
an earlier appearance
( 2) City activity. The shall be discouraged.
Commission shall review and
make recommendations to the (d) Changes which may
City Council concerning have taken place in the
City activity that could course of time are evi-
change the nature or ap- dence of the history and
pearance of a Heritage development of a build-
Preservation Site. ing, structure, or site
and its environment.
( 3 ) Preservation Procram. These changes may have
All decisions of the Com- acquired significance in
mission with respect to their own right, and this
this section shall be in significance shall be re-
accordance with the approv- cognized and respected.
ed program for the rehabil- (e) Destinctive stylis-
tic of each Heritage tic features. or examples
Preservation Site. The
following guidelines shall of skilled craftsmanship
be used to evaluate appli- which characterize a
cations for Site Alteration building, structure, orsite shall be treated
Permits.
with sensitivity. •
(a) Every reasonable ef-
fort shall be made to (f) Deteriorated archi-
provide a compatible use tectural features shall
for a property which re be repaired rather than
quires minimal alteration replaced, whenever possi-
of the building, struc- ble. In the event re-
ture, or site 'and its en- placement is necessary,
vironment, or to use a the new material; should
property for its origin- match the material being
ally intended purposes. replaced in composition,
design, color, texture,
(b) The distinguishing and other visual quali-
original qualities or ties. Repair or replace-
character of a building, ment of missing architec-
tural features should be
structure or site and its
envircnment shall not he based on accurate dupli •
-
cations of features,
sub-
destroyed. The removal • _
or alteration of any his-. stantiated by historic;
tot:ic.; material or dis- physical, or pictoral ev-
•
idence rather than on itage Preservation Site in •
conjectural designs or regard to the following:
the availability of dif-
ferent architectural ele- (1 ) In the case of a pro-
ments from other build- posed alteration or addi-
ings or structures. tion to an existing build-
ing, that Such alteration
(g) The surface cleaning or addition will not mate •
-
of structures shall be rially impair the architec-
undertaken with the gen- tural or historic value of
tlest means possible. the building, and shall
Sandblasting and other make written findings con-
cleaning methods thatsidering the , existing
will damage historic structures and existing ex-
building materials shall terior appearance, building
not be undertaken. height, . building width,
depth, or other dimensions,
(h) Contemporary design roof style, type of build-
for alterations and addi- ing materials, ornamenta-
tions to existing proper- tion, paving setback.
ties shall not be dis-
couraged when such alter- ( 2) In the case of the
ations and additions do proposed demolition of a
•
not destroy significant building prior to approval
historical, architectural of the demolition, the
or cultural material, and Commission shall make. writ-
such design is compatible. ten findings on the follow-
with the size, scale, ing: Architectural and his-
color, material, and toric merit of building,
character of the proper- the effect on surrounding
ty, neighborhood, or en- buildings, the effect of
vironment. any new proposed ccnstruc
tion on the remainder of
( i) Whenever possible the building . (in case of
new additions or altera- partial demolition) and on
tions to structures shall surrounding buildings, the
be done in such a manner economic value or useful-
that if such additions or ness of building as it now
alterations were to be exists, or if altered or
removed in the future, modified in comparison with
the essential form and the value or usefulness of
integrity of the struc- any proposed structures
ture would be unimpaired. designated to replace the
present building or build-
Subd. 7. FINDINGS. Before ings. •
approving any permit applica-
tion required under Subdivi- (3 ) In the case of a pro-
sicn 6 of this section to be posed new building, .that
approved by the Commission, such building will not in
the Commission shall make itself, or by reason of its
findings based on the .program location on the site, ..mate- _
fcr preservation and arc::'_- rially impair the architec-
tectural control for the Her- tural or historic value of
•
.
buildings on adjacent sites the City Council. The appeal
or in the immediate vicin- shall be deemed perfected up-
ity within the Historic on receipt by the City Clerk
Preservation Site. of two copies of a notice of •
appeal and statement setting
Subd. 8. LIMITATIONS. If forth the grounds for the ap-
: within forty-five ( 45) days peal. The City Clerk shall
from the filing of building transmit one copy of the
permit application the Com- notice of appeal and state-
mission has neither approved ment to the City Council and
nor denied the building per- one copy to the Commission.
mit application, the plans The Commission, in any writ-
and permit application shall ten order denying a permit
be deemed to have been ap- application, shall advise the
proved by the Commission, and applicant of' his right to ap-
if all other requirements of peal to the City Council and
the City have been met, the include this paragraph in all
division shall authorize a _ such orders.
permit for the proposed work.
No permit shall issue or work Subd. 11 . PENALTY FOR VIOLA-
commence in the event the TION. An owner or occupant
Commission disapproves the of any area, place, building,
application in accordance structure, or other object
with this section. within a duly designated Her-
itage Preservation Site who
Subd. 9. EMERGENCY REPAIR. violates the provisions of
In emergency. situations where this ordinance - shall be
immediate repair. is needed to guilty of a misdemeanor. Any
protect the safety of the architect, builder, contrac-
structure and its inhabi- tor, agent, person or corpor- .
tants, the division of hous- ation who assists in the com-
ing and building code en- mission of a violation of
forcement may approve the re- this ordinance shall be
pair without prior Commission guilty of a misdemeanor. For
action. In the case of a each such day an owner or oc-
permit issued pursuant to cupant of any area, place,
this subdivision, the divi- building, structure, or other
sion of housing and building object within a duly designa-
code enforcement shall imme- ted Heritage Preservation
diately notify the Commission . Site allows any work to be
of its action and specify the performed on any area, place,
facts or conditions constitu- building, structure or other
ting the emergency situation. object in violation of this
ordinance, it shall consti-
Subd. 10. APPEAL TO THE CITY tute a separate violation,
COUNCIL. The permit appli- and it shall be punishable as
cant or any party aggreived such. A Heritage Preserva-
by the decision of the Com- tion Site on which there
-mission shall, within ten exists any remodeling, re-
( 10 ) days of the date of the pairing, construction, or a
•
Commission' s order and deci- - • building moved in violation_
=j -r , neve a -, ht to appea.1 of this ordinance, is hereby
such order and decision to pec lared a nuisance,
imposition of the penalties
herein prescribed shall not
prevent the City from insti-
tuting an appropriate action
or proceeding to prevent an
.unlawful remodeling, repair,
construction, building,
building moving or demoli-
tion, or to restrain, correct
or abate a violation.
Subd. 12. REPOSITORY FOR
DOCUMENTS. The office of the
City Clerk is designated as
•
the repository for at least
•
one copy of all studies, re-
ports, recommendations and
programs required under this
Chapter 22.10.
Subd. 13. RECORDING OF HERI-
TAGE
ERI-TAGE PRESERVATION SITES. The
office of the City Clerk
shall record with the
Washington County Recorder or
the Washington County
Registrar of Titles the legal
description of all buildings ,
lands or areas designated as
Heritage Preservation Sites
by the Stillwater City Coun-
cil and shall transmit a copy
. of said legal descriptions to
the division of housing and
building cede enforcement."
Section 3. This Ordinance .
shall be in full force and ef-
fect from and after its passage
and publication according to
law.
Dated:
agia-414404-'
6Ax4(
Wally ?ltranamson, Mayor
ATTEST:
)4/U1-Lc.
•
1„1,r., Lc-111. 1„onnson, Cyty Cler,c
Pup i i snea: dune 15, 1987
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO.
NAME: Daniel M . SiebenalerKfilA7
DEPARTMENT: Police 101 fj-6,44(k
DATE: July 8 , 1992
MEETING DATE: July 20 , 1992
CATEGORY: Consent'
SUBJECT: Approve Dog Ordinance
EXPLANATION: Amendment to dog ordinance per council direction
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Ordinance attached
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson City Administrator
Karen Finstuen Administrative Assistant
SIGNATURE
0q2_. -21-76
6 -16 LIMITATION OF DOGS ON PREMISES
(A ) Limitations: Except as provided in 6-2-16( B) it shall be
unlawful for the owner of any parcel of land within the
corporate limits of the City of Farmington to own, keep or
harbor, or allow to be owned, keep or harbored on said parcel
more than two ( 2) dogs, unless a license for a dog kennel has
been secured.
( 1 ) For purposes of this Section, "owner" shall be any
person, firm, partnership or corporation shown to
be such on the record of the Dakota County Auditor
or Dakota County Treasurer.
(2) For purposes of this section "parcel of land" shall
mean that portion of land intended as a unit of
ownership to which the Dakota County Auditor or
Dakota County Treasurer has assigned a parcel number.
( B) Exception: The owner of a parcel of land in the City of
Farmington shall be allowed to own and keep up to a maximum of
four (4) dogs on a temporary basis under the following
conditions:
( 1 ) All dogs shall have been owned prior to residency in
the City of Farmington.
( 2) All dogs kept under provision of this Section shall be
unsexed as documented by a veterinarian' s certificate.
(3) All dogs kept under provisions of this Section shall be
sheltered within the primary residence on the parcel of
land.
( 4) Dogs shall be allowed outdoors only on the owner ' s •
property and secured within a fenced perimeter.
(5) All owners keeping dogs under provisions of this Section
shall come into compliance with 6-2-16(A) through
attrition.
(C) Fees: The owner of a dog licensed under the provisions of
616( B) shall be required to pay an annual fee for each dog
over that number authorized in 6-L.-16( A . . The Farmington City
Council shall, by resolution, establish the amount of the fee
required.
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO.
NAME: Daniel M . Siebenaler
DEPARTMENT: Police
DATE: - - - � "` 7�PR� 19/0445p •
/fA"".'`.
MEETING DATE: 2 'j-�'`-
CATEGORY: s Se A
�
� � ac� It .�
Si T: Dog Ordinance " �
EXPLANATION: Amendment to dog ordinance per council direction
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Ordinance attached
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson City Administrator
Karen Finstuen Administrative Assistant
SIGNA '
I
6-1-16 LIMITATION OF DOGS ON PREMISES
( A) Limitations: Except as provided in 6-2-16( B) it shall be
unlawful for the owner of any parcel of land within the
corporate limits of the City of Farmington to own, keep or
harbor, or allow to be owned, keep or harbored on said parcel
more than two (2) dogs, unless a license for a dog kennel has
been secured.
( 1 ) For purposes of this Section, "owner" shall be any
person, firm, partnership or corporation shown to
be such on the record of the Dakota County Auditor
or Dakota County Treasurer.
(2) For purposes of this section "parcel of land" shall
mean that portion of land intended as a unit of
ownership to which the Dakota County Auditor or
Dakota County Treasurer has assigned a parcel number.
( B) Exception: The owner of a parcel of land in the City of
Farmington shall be allowed to own and keep up to a maximum of
four (4) dogs on a temporary basis under the following
conditions:
( 1 ) All dogs shall have been owned prior to residency in
the City of Farmington.
(2) All dogs kept under provision of this Section shall be
unsexed as documented by a veterinarian's certificate.
(3) All dogs kept under provisions of this Section shall be
sheltered within the primary residence on the parcel of
land.
(4) Dogs shall be allowed outdoors only on the owner ' s
property and secured within a fenced perimeter.
(5) All owners keeping doge under provisions of this Section
shall come into compliance with 6-2-16(A) through
attrition.
t �
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO.
NAME: Larry Thompson
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: May 8, 1992
MEETING DATE: June 1, 1992 G//s/S' a- ?
CATEGORY: New Business
SUBJECT: Request to Amend Dog Ordinanc
EXPLANATION:
REFERENCE MATER /— PONSIBIL TY: nance - Dan Siebenaler
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Dan Siebenaler Police
Kathy Caroline 18035 Elgin Ave.
/
SI ,lr
4 4
, • (1;1'1(2
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO.
NAME: Larry Thompson
DEPARTMENT: Administration Pt e'a�'�` c
q,4,„,,Sx:....d.
DATE: May 8, 1992
MEETING DATE: M 7 T 9 • .
CATEGORY: New Business
gSr
SUBJECT: Request to Amend Dog Ordinance
EXPLANATION: Kat Caroli - , resident ' !.kota County 'st. -es, will
be pr- ent o discs s chan_ing the ordinanc- , or mak g
an excep.iof to the or ance, to allow ..re than 2 dog
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Lr - DCS----5 •
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Kathy Caroline 18035 Elgin Ave.
ff ��
SIGNA
! AF
9
1\fou.> IQ cra
OJYY\
r i •
�-L .� •
1 ePi '
uJ-C ` s cQ.,:a
ej±-3
106;JYY\L-LA_ crz
0 s' = �•-
Li;uasitet
LbtA4-,2)'
--G9,p_ArY7•
CITY OF FARMINGTON
/j5 MAY 71992
ECEIVENJ
-4111
t AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO. ( VY\
NAME: Dan Siebenaler
DEPARTMENT: Police
DATE: July 10, 1992
MEETING DATE: July 20, 1992
CATEGORY: Consent Agenda
SUBJECT: Resolution Amending Fees and Charges Resolution - Dog Permit Fees
EXPLANATION:
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Resolution - Dan Siebenaler
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Larry Thompson Administration
Karen Finstuen Administration
Dan Siebenaler Police
SIGMA qiir
PROPOSED
RESOLUTION
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. R4-92 — LICENSING OF DOGS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City
on the 20th day of July, 1992 at 7:00 P.M.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
Member introduced and Member seconded the following resolution:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R4-92, the City Council established fees and
charges for the licensing of dogs in the City of Farmington; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has amended ordinance 6-1-16 concerning the limitation
on the number of allowable dogs; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that fees for dogs in excess of those
allowed under 6-1-16 (A) shall be increased.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the owner of the third dog owned or kept on
a parcel shall pay an annual fee of $25.00 in addition to the established fee.
The owner of the fourth dog owned or kept on a parcel shall pay an annual fee of
$50.00 in addition to the established license fee.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open
session on the 20th day of July, 1992.
15.`.
RESOLUTION NO. R88-92
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. R4-92 — LICENSING OF DOGS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Civic Center of said City •
on the 20th day of July, 1992 at 7:00 P.M. --
The following members were present: Kuchera, Mayer, Orr, Rotty, Caller.
The following members were absent: None.
Member Mayer introduced and Member Orr seconded the following resolution:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R4-92, the City Council established fees and
charges for the licensing of dogs in the City of Farmington; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has amended ordinance 6-1-16 concerning the limitation
on the number of allowable dogs; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that fees for dogs in excess of those
allowed under 6-1-16 (A) shall be increased.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the owner of the third dog owned or kept on
a parcel shall pay an annual fee of $25.00 in addition to the established fee.
The owner of the fourth dog owned or kept on a parcel shall pay an annual fee of
$50.00 in addition to the established license fee.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open
session on the 20th day of July, 1992.
Mayor
Attested to the tie day•of -___) L. "2111("7 it l?.1"-dee'14(-------
, 1992.
•
SEAL /(
Cler 's r-tor
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM NO.
NAME: Karen Finstuen
DEPARTMENT: Administration
DATE: July 10, 1992
MEETING DATE: July 20, 1992
CATEGORY: Consent Agenda
SUBJECTS Building Permit Expiration Dates
EXPLANATION: Per Council request of June 15th
REFERENCE MATERIAL/RESPONSIBILITY: Memo - Pertinent Sections of UBC
REFERRED TO: (NAME) DEPARTMENT:
Development Commitee
SIGNATURE
•
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATES
DATE: JULY 13, 1992
Attached is the section from the Uniform Building Code that addresses expiration.
of building permits: I believe the code spells out the expiration time clearly;
the problem lies in the enforcement. Many permit holders believe that by applying
a board or driving a nail they have complied with the ordinance.
It is recommended that Council set a policy that requires that a substantial amount
of work must be done to extend the permit or the permit will expire. Staff would
interpret "substantial amount".
We have checked with surrounding cities in Dakota County and all follow the Uniform
Building Code expiration provisions.
Karen Finstuen
Administrative Assistant
cc: Development Committee
f
303 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
plans,specifications and other data filed therewith conform to the requirements of
this code and other pertinent laws and ordinances, and that the fees specified in
Section 304 have been paid, he shall issue a permit therefor to the applicant.
When the building official issues the permit where plans are required,he shall
endorse in writing or stamp the plans and specifications "APPROVED." Such
approved plans and specifications shall not be changed, modified or altered
;.r
without authorizations from the building official, and all work regulatedby this
code shall be done in accordance with the approved plans.
The building official may issue a permit for the construction of part of a
building or structure before the entire plans and specifications for the whole
building or structure have been submitted or approved,provided adequate infor-
mation and detailed statements have been filed complying with all pertinent
requirements of this code.The holder of such permit shall proceed at his own risk
without assurance that the permit for the entire building or structure will be
granted.
(b).Retention of Plans. One set of approved plans, specifications and compu-
tations shall be retained by the building official for a period of not less than 90
days from date of completion of the work covered therein;and one set of approved
plans and specifications shall be returned to the applicant, and said set shall be
kept on the site of the building or work at all times during which the work
authorized thereby is in progress.
(c) Validity of Permit. The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of
plans,specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for,or
an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other
ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or
cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not
be valid.
The issuance of a permit based upon plans, specifications and other data shall
not prevent the building official from thereafter requiring the correction of errors
in said plans, specifications and other data, or from preventing building opera-
tions being carried on thereunder when in violation of this code or of any other
ordinances of this jurisdiction.
(d)Expiration. Every permit issued by the building official under the provi-
sions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the
building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days
from the date of such permit,or if the building or work authorized by such permit
is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of
180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit shall be first
obtained to do so, and the fee therefor shall be one half the amount required for a
new permit for such work,provided no changes have been made or will be made in
the original plans and specifications for such work;and provided further that such
suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year.In order to renew action on
a permit after expiration,the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee.
Any permittee holding an unexpired permit may apply for an extension of the
time within which he may commence work under that permit when he is unable to
•
1988 EDITION 303-304
commence work within the time required by this section for good and satisfactory
reasons. The building official may extend the time for action by the permittee for
a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the permittee showing
that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action from
being taken. No permit shall be extended more than once.
(e)Suspension or Revocation. The building official may,in writing, suspend
or revoke a permit issued under the provisions of this code whenever the permit is
issued in error or on the basis of incorrect information supplied,or in violation of
any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions of this code.
Fees
Sec.304.(a)General.Fees shall be assessed in accordance with the provisions
of this section or shall be as set forth in the fee schedule adopted by the jurisdic-
tion.
(b)Permit Fees.The fee for each permit shall be as set forth in Table No. 3-A.
The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of this code
shall be made by the building official. The value to be used in computing the
building permit and building plan review fees shall be the total value of all
construction work for which the permit is issued as well as all finish work,
painting,roofing,electrical,plumbing,heating,air conditioning,elevators,fire-
extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment.
(c)Plan Review Fees.When a plan or other data are required to be submitted by
_ Subsection (b) of Section 302, a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of
submitting plans and specifications for review. Said plan review fee shall be 65
percent of the building permit fee as shown in Table No. 3-A.
The plan review fees specified in this subsection are separate fees from the
permit fees specified in Section 304(a)and are in addition to the permit fees.
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan review,
an additional plan review fee shall be charged at the rate shown in Table No. 3-A.
(d) Expiration of Plan Review. Applications for which no permit is issued
within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation, and
plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the
applicant or destroyed by the building official. The building official may extend
the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon
request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the control of the
applicant have prevented action from being taken. No application shall be ex-
tended more than once.In order to renew action on an application after expiration,
the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee.
(e)Investigation Fees:Work Without a Permit. 1. Investigation.Whenever
any work for which a permit is required by this code has been commenced without
first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit
may be issued for such work.
2. Fee. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected
whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued.The investigation fee shall
be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this code. The minimum
11