HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971 30
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
REGULAR
October 22, 1970
The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Members Shirley and Sifferath
Absent: Members Rotty and Nicolai
Also Present: were the V'»Age Administrator Ford and Commercial
Club members Owen Pool and Roger Clay.
Motion by Shirley that a public hearing be held at 7:30 p.m. on
November 12, 1970 to consider a request for a multiple dwelling special
exception and a density variance for the Southwest corner of Maple and
2nd street Parcel 6651-B. Second by Sifferath, APIF, passed.
The blanace of the meeting was devoted to a discussion between the
members of the Commerical Club and the Commission in regards to the
proposed downtown redevelopment plan.
Motion by Shirley that it now being 9:10 p.m. that the Ccmrnission stand
adjourned. Second by Sifferath, APIF, passed.
Repsectfully Submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
DECEMBER 10, 1970
Meeting was to have been called to order at 7:30 p.m.
Present: Rotty and Shirley
Absent: Rademacher, Sifferath and Nioolai
No quorum, no meeting held.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
MINUTES
PLANNING COM4ISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SPECIAL
January 14, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Rademacher.
Present: Rademacher, Nicolai, Shirley, Sifferath.
Absent: Rotty
Also Present: Village Administrator
The previously published public hearing was opened at 7:35 p.m. to
hear the request of Felix Tillges for a special exception for
multiple dwellings and for a density variance on Outlot A, Plat
of Chateau Manor 2nd Addition. The commission discussed this
matter at length with applicant Tillges and his counsel John
McBrien as well as with several residents in the audience. At
the conclusion of the discussion the Chairman stated he would
entertain a motion to grant the request. When none was forth-
coming the Chairman ruled the matter closed without any action
taken and the request denied. Motion by Sifferath, second by
Nicolai that the public hearing be closed at 8:15 p.m. Voting
for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Shirley, Sifferath. Voting against:
None. Absent: Rotty. Motion carried.
The commission discussed at length a proposed recommendation to
the council in the matter of formulating policy regulating entrance
and driveway access to village streets. The Village Administrator
was requested to contact Mr. Ken Anderson, County Safety Engineer
to obtain guidelines.
The commission conducted a general discussion concerning covenance
and building restrictions as to land/building rates. The sense
31
of the discussion was that in certain areas especially that in -
R-1 minilimm quality-residence would be desirable to maintain
neighborhood compatibility. However, it was agreed that such
requirements could very well contravene Federal objectives in the
provision of low income housing and that the social and economical
impact could be far reaching.
Motion by Shirley, second by Nicolai to adjourn at 9:45 p.m. Motion
Carried.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
VILLAGE OF FARMINGTON
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
FEBRUARY 25, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m.
Present: Roy Rademacher, Dan Nicolai, Warren Sifferath,
Roger Shirley and Gordon.
Minutes of the February 11, 1971, meeting were read and
approved.
Discussion of recently annexed 10 square mile portion of
Farmington. Chairman Rademacher read a letter frau Tooker
concerning the general development plan for the new area.
General discussion of the members followed.
The Planning Commission will continue to persue the rezoning
of a protion of the 10 square miles as indicated in the
minutes of February 11.
The chairman of the Planning Commisan will attend the next
meeting of the Farmington Village Council to present the
objectives of the Planning Command, discuss the possibility
of engaging the services for Mr. Tooker.
Warren Sifferath discussed South Saint Paul's Redevelopement
Plan and how it is being implemented. He stated there was
a possibility of a member of South Saint Paul's H & R caning
down to talk to us.
Motion by NicoAii; Second by Rademacher to pay Invoice #1 for
$100 fro molar. All in favor.
Respectfully Submitted,
Roger H. Shirley
VILLAGE OF FARMINGTON
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
FEBRUARY 11, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m.
Present: Roy Rademacher, Warren Sifferath, Roger Shirley,
Dan Nicolai, and Gordon Potty.
Discussion of zoning ordinance for new area west of old
Farmington Village location.
Jerry Bauer was present to request a lot size variance on
a lot which is 107 square feet short of the required footage
listed in the zoning ordinance. He has 7093 square feet,
7,200 square feet is required. Motion by Sifferath to set
a date for a public hearing on March 11 at 7:30 p.m. Second
by Nicolai all voted in favor.
Motion by Potty recommending to rezone that portion of
Sections 35 and 36 of Township 114N Range 20W lying North
32
of an irregular line 100 yards North of existing creek channel
to the North boundary of said sections. Area described to be
classified industrial under present I-1 zoning ordinance.
Second by Nicolai all voted in favor.
Respectfully Submitted,
Roger H. Shirley
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
MARCH 11, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m.
Present: Rademacher, Shirley and Nicolai
Also Present: The zoning officer and Building Inspector
Absent: Sifferath and Rotty
The public hearing was opened at 7:30 p.m. in the request of Mr. Jerry
Bauer for a density variance on a lot at 608 2nd St. concerning a
lot which he is proposing to purchase from property owned by the
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad described as the
85 ft. lying north of lot 7 block 5, Original Town of Farmington.
Motion by Shirley, second by Nicolai that because of the peculiar
situation involving this lot and the hardship resulting therefrom,
and because no opposition was forthcoming at the hearing, that Mr.
Bauer be granted a density variance from 7200 and 7093 sq. ft.
Voting for: Rademacher, Shirley and Nicolai. Voting against: None.
Absent: Sifferath and Rotty, motion carried.
Motion by Nicolai, second by Shirley that the Planning Cannission
recommend to the Council that Mr. Bauer in the above matter be granted
a waiver of platting under title 11, section 4, paragraph 5 in the
sub-division ordinance. Voting for: Rademacher, shirley, Nicolai.
Voting against: None. Absent: Sifferath and Rotty. Motion carried.
Mr. Don Johnson appeared before the board in regard to his application
for a building permit for a single family dwelling, lot 3 block 1,
Hill Dee Addition. Motion by Rademacher, second by Shirley that the
board make a determination of fact the Mr. Johnson is the owner of
above described lot thereby qualifying as a lot of record under
title 10, section 8, paragraph 10. Voting for: Rademacher, Shirley,
and Nicolai. Voting against: None. Absent: Sifferath, Potty. Motion
carried.
Motion by Rademacher, second by Shirley that the Planning Commission
recommend to the Council that title 10, section 8, paragraph 1C of the
zoning ordinance be amended by deleting the requirement that previous
platted lots of record be held in separate ownership in order to
qualify for the exemption under the zoning ordinance as to minimun'
area and width. Voting for: Rademacher, Shirley, Nicolai. Voting
against: None. Absent: Sifferath and Rotty. Motion carried.
Mr. Gunner Mortenson appeared to discuss with the board a possible
replat of Outlot 2, Chateau Manor involving townhouses and separately
owned residential garages held for renting. The board informed Mr.
Mortenson that they felt his suggestion to have very little merit
and requested that he explore other alternatives in solving his
problems.
Mr. Robert Stegmaier appeared to dicuss with the board his desire to
sell a single lot from property which he owns in the southwest quarter
of Section 13. He wished to sell a lot consisting of 41,400 sq. ft.
under the interim zoning. That area is in the A-1 zoning district with
a minimum lot requirement of 80,000 sq. ft. and a minimum lot width of
200 lineal feet. Motion by Rademacher, second by Nicolai that a public
hearing be set for April 8, 8:00 P.M. in the matter of a request for a
density variance of, from 80,000 sq. ft. to 41,400 sq. ft. and a minimum'
lot width variance of from 200 lineal ft. to 165 lineal ft. Voting for:
Rademacher, Shirley, Nicolai. Voting against: None. Absent: Sifferath
Rotty. Motion carried.
33
Motion by Nicolai, second by Shirley that the board recommend to the
Council that Mr. Stegmaier be granted a waiver of platting in the above
matter. Voting for: Rademacher, Shirley, Nicolai. Voting against: None
Absent: Sifferath, Rotty. Motion Carried.
Mr. Stegmaier also discussed with the planning commission a possible
sub-division which he was contemplating in the SW4 of Section 13 and
inquired as to the feasibility of his obtaining sewer and water. The
Planning Commission requested that the Administrator meet with the
Sewer Board and that the problem also be referred to the Water Board.
Motion by Shirley, second by Nicolai that Mr. Charles Tooker, the Village
Planner be instructed to proceed with the necessary studies required to
incorporate the newly acquired 10 sections into the village comprehensive
plan and zoning ordinance and that further he be informed that this
action is taken with the understanding that his original quotation of
$2500 be reduced to $1700 by eliminating the $800 cost item for printing
and editing. Voting for: Rademacher, Shirley, Nicolai. Voting against:
None. Absent: Sifferath and Rotty. Motion carried.
Mr. Adam Fettig appeared before the board in regard to certain construction
which he was performing on his property at 626 4th Street. The board
was informed that Mr. Fettig was in willfull violation of the Village
Code in that he was constructing without a building permit and that further
he was in the process of converting a duplex to a 3-unit dwelling
without having obtained a special exception. The board also was informed
that for Mr. Fettig to convert to a 3-unit dwelling he would require
a density variance of from 10,800 sq. ft. to 10,200 sq. ft. There was
some confusion as to whether Mr. Fettig was appearing in regard to the
stop order issued by the building inspector or whether he was appearing
to request a special exception and a variance. In the midst of the
dicussion, Mr. Fettig walked out of the meeting. The board then took
no further action except to inform the building inspector that if any
construction were to proceed henceforth that Mr Fettig be cited under
the ordinance.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 10:05 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
34
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
MARCH 25, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M.
Present: Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley and Sifferath.
Also Present: Administrator Ford
The commission discussed the advisability of continuing the upcoming
public hearing of April 8, to April 22, 1971, 7:30 P.M. This was due
to Holy week. They requested the Village Administrator to make the
necessary arrangements.
Warren Sifferath informed the commission members that he would try
to arrange for a visit from the president and the executive secretary
of the South St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment authority. He would
try to arrange this for 8:00 April 22. He agreed to inform the
Administrator with enough advance notice to allow inviting members
of the Council, the Industrial Development Corp and the Commercial
Club.
Mr. Henderson appeared before the Commission with a sketch plan of
a tentative new plat adjacent to Henderson Addition. The commission
reviewed her tentative plans with her and Mr. Dale Schwanz, land
surveyor. They were informed that they should proceed with the regular
procedure of submission of plats under Title 11, Chap 3 and Title 11,
Chap 4 of the Village Code. They indicated that they would be back
for the meeting of April 22, for preliminary plat review.
The Commission discussed in detail the present lot requirements in
Title 10, Chap 8 of the zoning ordinance. It was the general consensus
that the present requirements in R-1, C-1 and A-i were too severe as
regards single family dwellings having off-lot sewer and water, off-lot
sewer or water, on-lot sewer and water. They seem to think that a
40,000 sq. ft. area requirement and a 200 lineal ft. min width requirement
should be maintained for an on-lot sewer and water parcel but with the
added provision that in the case of platted property this requirement
could be lowered to 30,000 sq. ft. and 200 lineal ft. providing however,
the original plat would also include a secondary plat which would allow
sub-division of parcels down to 15,000 sq. ft. and 100 lineal ft. for
off-lot sewer or water and down to 10,000 sq. ft. and 100 lineal ft.
for off-lot sewer and water. The administrator was requested to take
this up with the Village Planner for his comments and suggestions. The
intent here is to reduce the minimums to keep Farmington competitive
while retaining the necessary criteria for public health.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
A
35
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
APRIL 22, 1971
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman Rademacher at 7:30 P.M.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, members Shirley, Sifferath and Rotty.
Absent; Member Nicolai
Also Present: Village Engineer D.S. Blaisdell and Administrator Ford.
Motion by Shirley, second by Rotty that the minutes of the previous meeting
be approved. Voting for: Rademacher, Shirley, Sifferath, Rotty.
Voting against: None. Absent: Nicolai. Motion Carried.
The chairman opened the public hearing as previously advertised at 7:30
P.M. to consider the request of Robert Stegmaier for a density variance
and a minimum lot width variance for his lot located in the Southwest
of section 13. Motion by Sifferath, second by Shirley that a density
variance and a minimum lot width variance be granted. Boting for:
Chairman Rademacher, Shirley, Sifferath and Rotty. Voting against: None
Absent: Nicolai. Motion carried.
At 8:00 P.M. the chairman introduced guest speakers Mr. Leonard and Mr.
Moriarity from the South St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority
who made a presentation lasting approximately one hour. A question and
answer period followed with several members of the audience taking part.
Mr. Lulu Henderson presented a sketched plan for a proposed plat of
Henderson, 2nd Addition. At the same time Mr. D.S. Blaisdell, Village
Engineer presented a written memorandum concerning this proposed plan.
After a lengthy discussion, Mrs. Henderson agreed to return to a sub-
sequent meeting of the Planning Commission with a revised plan that
would include, in addition to other requirements under the ordinance,
(a) an expanded area to be platted, (b) a 70 foot street width for the
collectors street and (c) dedicated open space within the plat.
Ms. Fran Baer, representing Viking Realty, had an informative discussion
with the Planning Commission concerning tentative plans for a Mobile
Home Park on the Stegmaier Farm, Sec 13, Lakeville Township, Village of
Farmington. Ms. Baer agreed to bring to a subsequent meeting of the
Planning Commission the developer whom she represents and to present
more detailed information concerning the proposal. This matter was
tabled until the meeting of May 13, 1971.
Motion by Sifferath, second by Shirley that a public hearing be set
7:30 P.M. , May 13, in the matter of a request by Adam Fettig for a
special exception to allow the conversion from a duplex to a multiple
dwelling and for a density variance of from 10,800 to 10,200 and
further that the $25.00 fee for each appeal be combined at $25.00 to
include both appeals. Voting for: Rademacher, Shirley, Sifferath, Rotty.
Voting against: None. Absent: Nicolai. Motion carried.
Motion by Shirley, second by Rotty that a public hearing be set for
7:30 P.M. , May 13, in the matter of a request for a special exception
by George F. and Esther P. Bell to allow the expansion of a continuing
non-conforming use at 308 Elm Street. Voting for: Rademacher, Shirley
Sifferath and Rotty. Voting Against: None. Absent: Nicolai. Motion
carried.
Mr. Bill Tschida, representing Lincoln Realty, who are the promoters
of Hill-Dee Addition sought from the Board of Adjustment relief for
a hardship which they believe to exist in the Hill-Dee 2nd Addition.
The hardship resulted from several lots having extreme front footages
with very little depth. One possible remedy would be to allow duplexes
or double bungalows. It was found, however, that both Hill-Dee Addition
and Hill-Dee 2nd Addition, being in the newly acquired 10 sections, had
an interim zoning of A-i. Two family units are not permitted in A-i
district. This matter was tabled for future action.
Motion by Shirley, second by Sifferath that the Planning Commission
recommend to the Council that Hill-Dee and Hill-Dec 2nd be rezoned
to an R-2 zoning district. Voting for: Rademacher, Shirley, Sifferath,
Rotty. Voting against: None. Absent: Nicolai. Motion Carried.
36
The Planning Commission set a special meeting for 7:30 P.M. , Tuesday
May 4, the specific purpose of which will be to discuss the problem
of street names and numbers and to make recommendations to the Council.
Mr. Gunner Isberg, Dakota County Planner, will appear.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 11:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SPECIAL
MAY 4, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, members Nicolai, Shirley and Sifferath.
Mr. Bob Rehagen, resident engineer for F.A.A. appeared to request a
special exception to expand an existing non-conforming use - public
building in R-1 zoning district. Motion by Sifferath, second by
Nicolai setting a public hearing in the matter for 7:30 P.M. May 27,
1971. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath.
Voting against: None. Motion carried.
The rest of the meeting was devoted to an open discussion concerning
proposed changes in the village street names and numbering system.
Representatives from the County Planners office explained the County
system in detail. Several citizens in the audience expressed their
opinion. The Planning Commission delayed making any recommendation
to the Council at this time.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 10:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
37
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
MAY 13, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Members Nicolai, Rotty and Shirley
Absent: Sifferath
Motion by Shirley, second by Rotty that the minutes of April 22, be approved.
Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley. Voting against: None.
Absent: Sifferath. Motion Carried.
At 7:30 P.M. the public hearing was opened in the matter of the request of
Adam Fettig in his request for a special exception (#8) and a variance (#19)
to convert a non-conforming duplex in an R-2 zone to a multiple dwelling
(3 units) . Motion by Shirley, second by Rotty that whereas applicant has
not shown a clear hardship and to grant these appeals would abrogate the intent
of the ordinance, that the appeals be denied. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai,
Rotty, Shirley. Voting against: None. Absent: Sifferath. Motion carried.
At 7:35 P.M. the public hearing was opened to consider the appeal of George
Bell for a special exception (#9) to expand a non-conforming use (wholesale
business) in the B-2 zone. Motion by Rotty, second by Shirley whereas the
proposed expansion is a permitted use under the ordinance and whereas it
is found that this activity would not be incompatible with the B-2 zoning
and whereas no variance has been requested in regard to the parking require-
ment of 4 spaces per 1000 sq. ft. It is moved that the special exception be
granted. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty and Shirley. Voting
against: None. Absent: Sifferath. Motion carried.
The appeal of Mr. Chris Luebke for a special exception (#10) to allow a home
occupation in an R-2 zone was considered. Mr. Luebke wished to operate a
part time barber shop from his residence at 708 Walnut. Motion by Nicolai,
second by Rotty that a public hearing be set for 7:30 P.M. , June 10 under
section 10-10-8 of the zoning ordinance. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai,
Rotty, Shirley and Sifferath. Voting against: None. Motion carried.
At 7:55 P.M. the agenda called for a presentation by viking Realty in regard
to a proposed Mobil Home Park in Section 13, Lakeville Township, Village of
Farmington. Mr. Fran Baer, representative of Viking Realty informed the
commission that her client was unable to attend and request that the matter
be set over until 8:00 P.M. , May 27. The commission agreed.
Mrs. Lulu Henderson met for the second time with the commission to discuss
the proposed plat, Henderson 2nd Addition. The commission raised several
questions concerning the proposed plat and especially in regard to minimum
lot size for on lot sewer and water. Several suggestions were made to Mrs.
Henderson by which her plat might possible be improved and initial capital
outlay reduced. One such suggestion was to actually plat and file the entire
area and then to develop in phases. Mrs. Henderson expressed some reluctance
to premature platting because she feared substantial increase in property
taxes due to platting. It was agreed that the Village Administrator would
contact the County Assessors to attempt to secure some written assurance
from the assessor that this would not occur.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
39
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
MAY 27 , 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by chairman Rademacher.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Commissioners Nicolai, Shirley.
Absent: Commissioners Rotty and Sifferath.
Also present: Village Planner Tooker and Administrator Ford
At 7:30 the Public Hearing on the appeal by F.A.A. for a special
exception to allow the expansion of an existing non-conforming use
in an R-1 zoning district. Motion by Shirley, second by Nicolai
that the special exception be granted. Voting for: Rademacher,
Nicolai, Shirley. Voting against: None. Absent: Rotty and Sifferath.
Motion Carried.
Commissioner Sifferath arrived at 7:45.
The commission has a short discussion concerning street names and
numbering policy. It was decided to table this matter pending results
of the J. C. poll.
The advisory meeting with the commission was begun at 8:00 concerning
a proposed Mobile Home Park in section 13 on the Robert Stegmaier
property. It was disclosed that the applicant is Mr. Gerald Toberman
President of Modular Industries Corporation. Representing the applicant
was Mrs. Fran Baer of Viking Realty and Mr. Gaynor Hemness and
Mr. Jim Levy of Park Development and Management Corporation. The
representatives of the applicant made a presentation to the Planning
Commission giving the background and corporate history of the
developers. They indicated that the proposed site totaled 312 acres
and they would anticipate 200 units at the start. Mr. Hemness
described several existing Mobile Home Parks which they have developed
and presently manage and he stated that in these parks they are
averaging 8/10 school age child per mobile home. His exposition included
an analysis of taxes paid to the municipality and to the School district
by Mobile Home Parks as compared to the equivalent of the present R-2
residential zoning district in Farmington. This analysis showed Mobile
Home Parks to be more favorable to both the municipality and School
District. Mr. Hemness also stated that four separate bulls dealing
with Mobil Home Parks which would make the situation even more favorable
and passed both houses of the legislature and were awaiting the Governors
signature. The following statistics were presented by Mr. Hemness
PARK NO.SPACES CHILD RATIO UNITS
Eaton Park 108 18 1.6
So. St. Paul 70 4 1.4
Connelly's 61 15 1.4
Queen Ann 155 25 1.6
Sunny Acres 121 35 1.4
Skyline Village 250 42 1.6
Camelot 117
Hastings Park 72 10 1.7
Mr. Hemness further stated that in all of the parks which they
operate they restrict entrants to two children per unit, resulting
in an average of three children per acre.
Commissioner Rotty arrived at 8:45 P.M.
Mr. Bill Tschilda appeared, representing Lincoln Realty, to request
a special exception for Multiple-Dwellings, Hill-Dee Addition, all
of block 3 and outlot A of Block 1. This area was recently rezoned
to R-1. Motion by Sifferath, second by Shirley that a public hearing
be set for this matter for 7:30 P.M. June 24. Voting for: All. M. C.
Village Planner, Charles Tooker, agreed to make a report to the
Planning Commission on June 10, as to his progress of planning
study for the new 10 sections. He also agreed to have his completed
report ready for the meeting of the 24th.
40
Motion by Nicolai, second by Shirley whereas in view of the recom-
mendation of the Village Planner has been recommended that the
following described land presently zoned R-1 be zoned R-2:
Including 300' west of the center line of Division St. between
Elm and Spruce and 650' west of the center line of Div St.
between Spruce and the east west alley which lies between
Spruce and Walnut Street.
Voting for: Chairman Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley and Sifferath.
Voting against: none. Motion carried.
The commission deferred making any recommendations at this time con-
cerning zoning for bill boards.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 10:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
41
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
JUNE 10 , 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7 : 30 P.M.
Present : Chairman Rademacher, members Nicolai and Rotty
Absent : Shirley and Sifferath
Also present : Administrator Ford and Planner Tooker
The Public Hearing on the request for a special exception by Chris
Luebke for a home occupation (Barber Shop) in his residence at 704
Walnut Street. Motion by Rademacher, second by Nicolai that special
exception #11 dated 6-10- 71 be granted to Mr. Luebke. Voting for:
Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty. Absent : Sifferath and Shirley. Motion
Carried.
Mr. and Mrs Dale Neilan appeared to discuss with the commission the
possiblility of installing a commercial camp ground located on their
property in the SE% of the SE% of Section 36, Lakeville Township.
This matter was referred to the Administrator and the Planner for
researching.
Planner Charles Tooker presented his preliminary planning and zoning
ideas for the newly acquired 10 sections . He was instructed to pro-
ceed with the assignment.
The comiission discussed briefly the matter of the proposed billboard
regulation ordinance. This matter was laid over to the next meeting.
The Planning Commission discussed the merits of a recommendation by the
Administrator that the Council adopt a policy of informing all abutting
property owners by direct mail in all instances of proposed rezoning,
special exceptions , variances . Motion by Nicolai, second by Rotty that
the Commission go on record as favoring that the Administrator pass the
recommendation on to the Council along with a study which would show
approximate work load and cost that would have been incurred during the
first half of 1971. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty. Voting
against : None. Absent: Shirley and Sifferath. Motion Carried.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 10 : 30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
WJF/kg
43
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
JUNE 24, 1971
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 7:30 P.M.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Members Nicolai and Shirley.
Absent: Members Rotty and Sifferath
Also Present: Administrator Ford and Planner Tooker
A request by Harris-Jorgensen for a special exception to allow multiple
dwellings on certain selected lots was tabled after the Administrator
informed the Commission that the applicant had withdrawn his request.
The withdrawal was based on the extremely low density allowed because
of on-lot sewer and water in an R-1 zone.
The Commission discussed the request of Dale E. Neilan for a Tourist
Camp. It was agreed that the Administrator would contact the State
Public Health Department to determine their jurisdiction and also to
secure some model ordinances. This matter was laid over to the
meeting of July 8.
The problem of bullboard regulation was deferred until a later date.
A request by Midwest Federal to construct 26 single car garages on the
southeast corner of the Townsedge Shopping Center property was found
to be acceptable in general but the Administrator was requested to
secure a site plan drawn to scale. This matter was laid over to the
meeting of July 8.
Motion by Shirley, second by Nicolai that the Planning Commission re-
commend to the Council that the following be rezoned from R-1 to R-2:
Outlots 2 and 3 Chateau 1st and Outlot A, Chateau Manor 2nd. Voting
for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Shirley. Voting against: None. Absent:
Rotty, Sifferath. Motion Carried.
Motion by Nicolai, second by Shirley that a Public Hearing be set for
July 22, 7:30 P.M. to consider the application of Felix Tillges for a
special exception to allow multiple dwellings on Outlot A of Chateau
Manor 2nd. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Shirley. Voting against:
None. Absent: Rotty, Sifferath. Motion Carried.
Planner, Charles Tooker, again reviewed with the Planning Commission his
progress on the planning for the newly acquired 10 sections to be in-
corporated into the Village Comprehensive Plan. His considerations to
this point have emphasized land use, projected population densities and
transportation. There was a lengthy discussion in which members of the
audience also took part including mobile home park developer Toberman
and land owner Stegmaier. There appeared to be a good deal of difference
in opinion as between the Commission and the planner and among the three
commission members present. The main points of contention were locations
and quantity of green space, the existence of an R-2 land use in the
northern part of the Village and the allotted acreage of industrial
land use. It was agreed to have a work session with the Planning Commission
and the planner prior to the next meeting on July 8. It was hoped
that at the meeting of the 8th that a consensus could be arrived
at so that a tentative plan could be taken to the public for discussion.
Motion by Nicolai, second by Shirley that a public hearing be set for 8:00
P.M. , July 22, for the purpose of reviewing the proposed Village
Comprehensive Plan after which the Commission could, hopefully, certify
it to the Council. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Shirley. Voting against:
None. Absent: Rotty, Sifferath. Motion Carried.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 10:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
45
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR
JULY 8, 1971
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 7:45 P.M.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Members Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath
Also Present: Administrator Ford, Engineer Blaisdell and Planner Tooker
Motion by Nicolai, second by Shirley that the minutes of 5/27 and 6/10
be approved. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath
Voting against: None. Motion carried.
Motion by Shirley, second by Nicolai that the proposed plat of Henderson
2nd Addition be recommended to the Council for approval with the following
stipulations:
1. That it be understood that water mains $ feeders be extended
from the present municipal system and in every case looped.
2. That the existing lift station be moved in the 1st stage.
3. That the storm sewer be installed as shown on the plat in the
first stage.
4. That the improved storm water storage pond be constructed and
dedicated in the first stage.
5. That no building permits be issued to any lot which does not
at that time have sanitary sewer, water, curb and gutter, and
paving improvements in.
And further, that the Council take special cognizance of the problems
which are presented by constructing houses with basements at or below
the highwater table mark. The motion recommending approval specifically
stipulates that the Council should (a) prior to approval of this plat
amend the building code to prohibit the construction of basements,
structures, or sub-structures within 2 feet of the high water table
mark (b) approve this plat with this specific prohibition, or (c)
111 approve this plat with the understanding that if the above restriction
is not operative, municipal funding would not be available for the
improvements. All of the above being in accordance with the memorandum
from D.S. Blaisdell $ Assoc. , dated July 8, 1971. Voting for: Rademacher,
Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath. Voting against: None. Motion carried.
The Planning Commission discussed with the Administrator the preliminary
work which he had compiled toward preparation of an ordinance regulating
Tourist Parks and Camp grounds. It was agreed that the basic points re-
quiring regulations would be included in a model ordinance and distributed
to the commission for review.
A proposed ordinance regulating bill boards was put over to the meeting
of July 22, 1971
In reviewing the site plan of Midwest Federal's to construct 26 single
garages within Lot 1, Townsedge Replat, it was determined that the pro-
posal was in compliance with the zoning ordinance and that if no variance
was requested that the building permit be issued.
The balance of the meeting was taken up in a full scale discussion
of the proposed Village Comprehensive Plan involving the Commission,
Administrator Ford, Planner Tooker, Engineer Blaisdell, and members
of the audience.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
WJF/kg
47
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
JULY 22, 1971
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rademacher.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, members Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley and
Sifferath.
Also present: Administrator Ford and Planner Charles Tooker
Minutes of June 24 and July 8, 1971 were approved.
A request by Mr. Bob Emerson, 521 Heritage Way, for a sidelot variance
was tabled without action due to a lack of motion. It was felt that a
hardship peculiar to the property had not been shown.
The preliminary draft of a proposed ordinance regulating recreational
camp areas was discussed by the members of the commission and by citizens
in the audience including Mr. and Mrs. Dale Neilan. This matter was to
be discussed again at the meeting of August 19.
The public hearing scheduled for 8:00 P.M. was opened by the Chairman
dealing with a review of the substantial change to the Village Compre-
hensive plan which incorporates the newly annexed 10 sections. A very
long discussion ensued. Motion by Sifferath, second by Rotty, that the
land use and transportation maps be adopted and presented with the following
changes to be made:
(a) Convert the high density area North of and abutting 50 and
East of Flagstaff to industrial.
(b) Move the commercial zone expressed in red in the Northeast
quadrant of Flagstaff and 50 to the Southeast quadrant and
that the plan be presented and certified to the Council at
their meeting of August 2.
Voting for: Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath. Voting against:
Rademacher. Motion Carried.
Planner Tooker was instructed to prepare and present to the Commission
a model zoning map based on the above plan at the meeting of August 19.
The Commission allowed time on the agenda to Mrs. Fran Baer, Viking
Realty, to discuss a proposed Mobile Home Park in Section 13. Also
speaking on the matter was Mr. Toberman and Mr. Stegmaier.
Motion by Sifferath, second by Shirley recommending the Code be
amended as to zoning in order to allow Mobile Home Parks as a special
exception in all R-1 zoning Districts. Voting for: Rademacher, Rotty,
Nicolai, Shirley, Sifferath. Voting against: None. Motion carried.
Mr. Stegmaier requested the Commission to rezone his farm from A-1 to
residential. The Chairman stated that he would entertain such a motion
and when none was forthcoming the matter was dropped.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 10:40 I .M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
r 49
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSIO
REGULAR
AUGUST 19, 1971
The meeting was called to order by Chairmandemacher at 7:30 P.M.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Members Rotty t
nd Sifferath.
Arriving later: Members Nicolai and Shirley
III Also Present: Administrator Ford and Plannei' Tooker
Motion by Rotty, second by Sifferath that th minutes of July 22, 1971,
be approved with the follwoing correction: n the motion of Sifferath
and Rotty that the land use and transportati n maps be adopted, show
Rademacher as voting against. Voting for: demacher, Rotty, Sifferath.
Voting against: None. Absent: Nicolai and Shirley. Motion carried.
l
The public hearing was opened in the request of Felix Tillges for special
exception #12 to allow multiple-dwellings inan R-2 zone, Outlot A,
Chateau Manor 2nd Addition. Motion by Rotty second by Shirley that
the above special exception be granted. Vot g for: Rademacher, Rotty,
Shirley and Sifferath. Voting against: Non . Absent: Nicolai. Motion
carried.
The Planning Commission had a lengthy discus ion with Mr. Bob Emerson
who requested that several lots in Chateau or 2nd Addition be recommended
to the Council for rezoning from R-1 to R-2. Motion by Rotty, second by
Sifferath to recommend to the Council that 1 is 1-10, block 2, Chateau
Manor 2nd Addition be rezoned from R-1 to R- . Voting for: Rotty. Voting
against: Rademacher, Nicolai, Shirley, Siff rath. Request denied.
The Planning Commission again reviewed the proposed ordinance to license
and regulate camping areas. This matter was set over to the meeting of
August 26, 1971. I
IIII
Motion by Nicolai, second by Rotty to approve the payment of a bill from
Charles Tooker in the amount of $800.00. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai,
Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath. Voting against: None. Motion carried.
Motion by Sifferath, second by Nicolai to set the time for a public hearing
at 8:00 P.M. , September 23, 1971, to hear the request of Robert Stegmaier
for a special exception to permit Mobile Home Park on his land located in
Section 13, the Administrator to publish. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai,
Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath. Voting against: None. Motion carried.
Planner Tooker made a presentation to the P1ing Commission of the pre-
liminary zoning map and a lengthy discussion followed. Tooker was asked
to make certain modifications and changes in luding the creation of an
fln
R-3 zone (multiple-dwellings) , new suggested language in the ordinance
and to square off to some extent the irregul .r boundaries between zoning
districts.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 10:15 ] .M.
Respectfully submitted,
P Y
III
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
IL 1
Ir I
51 w
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
SEPTEMBER 9, 1971
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 7:30 P.M.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Members Rotty, Shirley and Sifferath.
Absent: Member Nicolai
Also present: Village Administrator Ford and{ Planner Charles Tooker.
Motion by Sifferath, second by Rotty that th proposed ordinance
regulating and licensing of Recreational C ing acreas be referred
to the Council for their recommendation for doption with changes
as indicated. Voting for: Rademacher, Rott , Shirley, Sifferath.
Voting against: None. Absent: Nicolai. M tion carried.
Motion by Shirley, second by Rotty that the Village Code be amended
to allow recreational camping areas as a pe itted use in A-1 and C-i
zoning districts and as special exception in an R-1 zoning district.
Voting for: Rademacher, Shirley, Rotty, Sif erath. Voting against:
None. Absent: Nicolai. Motion carried.
Request of Howard Haffner for a building permit at 19618 Pilot Knob
Road was set aside until 8:00 P.M. , October 14, at which time it
would be determined as to:
(a) the land use to which he intends to put the land, use car
storage or sales
(b) whether or not a continuing non-conforming use existed as
of November 16, 1970.
(c) if it existed, whether or not it has been abandoned.
(d) whether the changes he proposes is substantial and
significant and therefore, prohibited under title 10,
section 10, paragraph IN & 1B.
III Motion by Sifferath, second by Shirley, that a public hearing be set
for October 14, 1971, at 7:30 P.M. for a heiht variance to John Devney
for the construction of silos on his farm at 5744 Lakeville Blvd.
Voting for: Rademacher, Rotty, Shirley, Sif erath. Voting against:
None. Absent: Nicolai. Motion carried.
Motion by Rotty, second by Sifferath, that a ublic hearing be set
for October 14, 1971, at 7:30 P.M. for an of street parking variance
to the VFW Club at 209-211 Oak Street. Voting for: Rademacher, Rotty,
Shirley, Sifferath. Voting against: None. bsent: Nicolai. Motion
carried.
A lengthy and involved discussion took place concerning the proposed
extension of an amendment to the zoning ord. ance in the new ten
sections as recommended by the Planner. A s ecial work session was
scheduled for 7:00 P.M. , September 16, at which time the new zoning
map and amendments would be thoroughly discused.
The Planning Commission asked the Village Adrr.inistrator to recommend
to the Council that in view of the ever increasing work load that
separate individuals be appointed to compose the Planning Commission
and the Board of Adjustments.
III The Administrator was also asked to check into the legality of
remuneration for Planning Commission members.
Motion by Rotty, second by Rademacher that t e bill of Charles
Tooker be paid as presented. Voting for: demacher, Rotty, Shirley,
Sifferath. Voting against: None. Absent: Nicolai. Motion carried.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 11:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
I
53
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL
SEPTEMBER 17, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Rademacher
Present: Chairman Rademacher, members Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath and
Nicolai.
Also present: Planner Tooker
The entire evening was devoted to an examination of suggested
amendments to the zoning ordinance and map with planner Charles
Tooker.
Motion by Sifferath, second by Nicolai that the Planning Commission
recommend to the Council, the following changes to the zoning
ordinance and map as amended. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty,
Shirley and Sifferath. Voting against: None. Motion carried.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
• REGULAR
SEPTEMBER 23, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Rademacher.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, members Nicolai, Rotty and Shirley.
Absent: Member Sifferath
Motion by Nicolai, second by Rotty that the minutes of August 19, 1971
be approved as presented. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley.
Voting against: None. Absent: Sifferath. Motion carried.
Motion by Shirley, second by Rotty that the minutes of September 9, 1971 be
approved with changes as indicated. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty,
Shirley. Voting against: None. Absent: Sifferath. Motion carried.
The Zoning officer presented to the Planning Commission a proposal by
Darrell Sisson to secure access to his property from the Municipal Pool
Parking lot. The Commission unanimously thought it a bad idea.
At 8:00 P.M. the Chairman opened the public hearing on the request by Robert
Stegmaier for a special exception to allow a Mobile Home Park on his land
in section 13. A lengthy discussion followed among members of the Commission
and the audience. At 8:45 P.M. the chairman ruled that there being no
futher discussion he would entertain a motion. Motion by Shirley that the
request be denied. Motion was withdrawn when no second could be obtained.
Motion by Rotty, second by Nicolai that the special exception be granted
contingent upon the area in question actually being zoned appropriately
by the Council at their public hearing to be held October 18, 1971. Voting
for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Rotty. Against: Shirley. Absent: Sifferath.
Motion carried.
The zoning officer was requested to look into the possibilities of some sort of
remuneration for Planning Commission members.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
Zoning Officer
•
CHAPTER 2
ZONING MAP; DISTRICTS
SECTION
10-2-2 : Zoning Districts :
Residential Districts
"R-A" Agricultural District
"R-i" Suburban District
"R-2" Urban District
"R-3" Multiple District
CHAPTER 3
•
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
10-3-1: Purpose:
(A) "R-A", the Agricultural District is designated for
for land where central water and sewer facilities are not
now available and the installation of these facilities is
of low priority. It is primarily an agricultural area
within the Village that should remain for the forseeable
future.
(B) "R-1"
( C) "R-2"
(D) "R-31', the Multiple District, is designated for land
which should be devoted to high density developments
including apartments, town houses and planned unit develop-
ments. This district represents a more intensive use of
land than would be permitted in the other "R" districts.
• CHAPTER 7
PERMITTED USES
i
10-7-1 : Permitted Uses :
R-A Agricultural Districts
1. Agriculture 1. Home Occupation
2 Single�Family Dwellings 2. Commercial Recreational Uses
—0, . Travel Trailer Storage 3. Public Buildings
. Public Parks and Play-
,J4. Public Utility Buildings
mow' grounds 5. Water and Sewage Treatment
. Public and Parochial Plants
Schools 6. Sanitary Land Fills
. Golf Courses 7 . Cemeteries
�` . Specialized Animal 8. Mineral Extraction
Stables and Riding, 9. Radio and T.V. Stations
Academies 10. Water Recreation and Water
(�. Churches Storage
1Q. Greenhouses and
Nurseries'
11. Essential Services
• 1.4. Accessory Uses
R-1 Suburban District
( change wording) 5. Hospitals and Clinics
9. Public Buildings
11. Planned Unit Development
R-2 Urban DistriLt��`" '��`���
( change wording) 6. Hospitals and Clinics
11. Public Buildings
13. Planned Unit Development
14. Mobile Home Parks
i 5• I M.Jr e1&IAA�
R-3 Multiple District
1. Single {Family Dwellings 1. Nursing Homes
2. Two-Family Dwellings 2. Hospitals & Clinics
3. Multiple-Family Dwellings 3. Public Utility Buildings
. Public & Parochial Schools 4. Fire Stations
Public Parks & Playgrounds 5. Public Buildings
• Churches 6. Private Clubs
7 . Planned Unit Development
L
CHAPTER 8
LOT AND YARD REQUIREMENTS
• 10-8-2 LOT AND YARD REQUIREMENTS:
R-A R-1 R-2 R-3
Minimum Lot Area ( sq. ft. ) <
off-lot sewer and water 80,000 10,000 7,200
off-lot sewer or water 80,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
on-lot sewer and water 80,000 40,000 40,000
40,000
Minimum Lot Area/Family ( sg .ft. ) j' by
off-lot sewer and water 80'000
off-lot sewer or water 80,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
on-lot sewer and water 80,000 40,000 20,000 20,000
Minimum Lot Width ( sq. ft. )
off-lot sewer and water 200 75 40 iPl
• off-lot sewer or water 200 100 100 100
on-lot sewer and water 200 200 150 150
Minimum Depth Front Yard (feet) 30 30 30 30
Minimum Width Side Yard (feet) 25 10 goo
��
B-1 B-2 B-3 -1-1 C-1
Minimum Lot Area (sq. ft. )
off-lot sewer and water 10,000 5000 5,000 40,000 80,000
off-lot sewer or water 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000 80,000
on-lot sewer and water 40,000 40,000 40000 80,000 80,000
_Minimum Lot Area/Family (sq. ft. ) -
off-lot sewer and water -- 1,800 -- -- 80,000
off-lot sewer or water -- 10,000 -- -- 80,000
on-lot sewer and water -- 200000 -- -- 80,000
Minimum Lot Width (feet)
off-lot sewer and water 75 50 50 150 200
off-lot sewer or water 100 10.0 100 200 200 -
on-lot sewer and water 150 150 150 200 200
Minimum Depth Front Yard (feet) 30 io 10 40 30
Minimum Width Side Yard (feet) 10 6 25 25
•
• •
CHAPTER 10
• GENERAL REGULATIONS
10-10-5 : PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT : To help encourage a more
creative approach to the use of land, departures from the Zoning
Ordinance may be granted by the Village Council in Planned Unit
Development Districts designated on the official Zoning Map.
Permission to develop specific parcels of land under the provisions
which follow, shall be binding on all construction. Any proposed
change in the development plan after approval by the Village Council
shall be resubmitted for consideration. The land use minimum
lot area, yard, height and accessory uses determined by the planned
unit development requirements shall prevail over conflicting require-
ments listed elsewhere within this Zoning Ordinance or in the
Farmington Subdivision Ordinance.
(A) Preliminary Development Plan Procedure: An applicant for a
planned unit development shall submit a preliminary development
plan to the Zoning Officer with a written statement and a
certified check or money order, in an amount of not less than
twenty five ($25.00) dollars or more than two hundred ($200.00)
dollars to cover the costs incurred in checking and processing
such plans.
1. Within 60 days after the filing of the preliminary plan
• with the Zoning Officer, the Planning Commission shall forward
the plan to the Village Council with a written report recom-
mending that the plan be disapproved, approved, or approved
with modifications stating the reasons for these recommendations.
2. Within 45 days after the receipt of the application by the
Village Council a public hearing shall be held by the Village
Council on the application. The Village Council may continue
the hearing or refer the matter back to the Planning Commission
for further study, provided, however, that the public hearing or
hearings shall be concluded within 45 days after the date of the
first public hearing, unless the applicant shall consent in
writing to an extension of the time. Upon conclusion of all
hearings the Village Council shall within 30 days make and file
findings and cause a copy thereof to be mailed to the applicant.
3. In the event tentative approval is granted subject to
conditions, the applicant shall, within 45 days after receiving
a copy of the findings of the Village Council, notify the Village
Council of the acceptance or refusal of all conditions. Refusal
of the applicant shall constitute denial of the plans by the
Village Council. Failure of the land owner to notify the Village
Council of his acceptance or refusal of the conditions to the
plan, constitute acceptance of the conditions.
•
(B) Final Development Plan Procedure : Within six months following
the approval of the preliminary development plan, the applicant
shall file with the Zoning Officer a final development plan
containing in final form the information required in the prelim-
inary plan. The Village Council at its discretion may extend
for six months the period for filing of the final development
plan.
1. The Zoning Officer shall send a reproducible print and one
other print to the Chairman of the Village Planning Commission.
If the Planning Commission finds that the final plan is in
substantial compliance with the plan given preliminary approval,
it shall endorse the plan and submit it to the Village Council
within 30 days.
2. A public hearing on an application for final approval of the
plan or part thereof shall not be required provided that the
plan is in substantial compliance with the plan given preliminary
approval.
3. In the event the plan as submitted for final approval is not
in substantial compliance with the preliminary plan, the Village
Council shall notify the applicant within 45 days of the date
• of application setting forth ways in which the plan is not in
substantial compliance.
a. The applicant may treat such notification as denial of
final approval : or
b. The applicant may refile his plan so that it does
substantially comply with the preliminary plan: or
c. The applicant may file a written request with the Village
Council that it hold a public hearing on his request for
final approval. Any such hearing shall be held within 30
days after the request for such a hearing. Within 45 days
of such hearing the Village Council shall either grant final
approval or deny final approval to the plan.
4. If the Village Council fails to act, within the time
prescribed, the applicant may, after 20 days written notice
to the Village Council, file a complaint with any court of
local jurisdiction. Upon showing that the Village Council has
failed to act within the time prescribed, the court can enter
an order directing the County Registrar of Deeds to record the
plan as submitted for final approval without the approval of the
Village Council.
5. In the event a plan is given final approval and the
applicant shall abandon said plan or in the event the appli-
cant shall fail to begin construction of the planned unit
development within 18 months after final approval has been
granted, final approval shall terminate unless such time period
is extended by the Village Council.
(C) General Requirements : In a planned unit development the
following regulations should be considered prior to the
submission of a preliminary development plan.
1. Ownership); The tract of land shall be under unified control
at the time of application and scheduled to be developed as one
unit.
2. Minimum Size: No planned unit development may include less
than five acres of contiguous land.
3. Minimum Building Spacing: Any buildings exceeding the
height limits permitted in the surrounding district shall be
so located as to eliminate the possibility of casting unbroken
shadows on adjoining parcels.
4. Harmony: The planned unit development should be planned and
developed to harmonize with both existing and proposed devel-
opments in the area surrounding the project.
5. Permitted Uses : The permitted uses may include :
a. Any combination of dwelling units in single family,
two family, town or row houses and apartments.
b. Any non-residential use, to the extent such non-residential
use is designed and intended to serve the residents of the
planned unit development.
c. Public and private education facilities.
d. Other uses permitted in the Zoning District in which
the planned unit development is located.
6. Open Spaces : A minimum of twenty percent for private or
public open air recreational uses protected by adequate covenants
running with the land or by conveyances or dedications as the
Planning Commission shall specify shall be an integral part of
the plan. Such open space shall not include apace devoted to
streets, parking and private yard space.
•
7 . Density: An increase in density may be allowed under the
following conditions provided that traffic patterns will not
be adversely affected and that public facilities are adequate.
a. For undeveloped common open space, a maximum increase
of five percent.
b. For distinctiveness and excellence in siting, design,
and landscaping, a maximum increase of five percent.
(D) Preliminary Development Plan Specifications : An applicant shall
submit to the Zoning Officer the preliminary development plan
which shall be composed of drawings and a written statement.
1. The drawings may be in schematic form and must contain the
following:
a. The location, size of site and the proposed uses of the
land to be developed.
b. The density of land use to be allocated to the several
parts of the site to be developed.
• c. The location and size of all common open space and the
form of organization to own and maintain such space.
d. The use, height, bulk and approximate location of
buildings and other structures.
e. The plans for 'the distribution of sanitary wastes and
storm water.
f. The plans for parking of vehicles and the location and
width of proposed streets.
g. A schedule showing the proposed times within which
application for final approval of all sections of the
planned unit development are intended to be filled.
h. A topographic map prepared by a registered civil
engineer or land surveyor covering the entire tract
proposed for development. Such maps ,shall be drawn at
a scale of 1" = 1001 and shall indicate topography at a
two foot contour interval. It shall show in accurate detail
the topography$ existing buildings, land features and trees.
•
2. The written statement shall include the following:
a. An explanation of the general character of the planned
unit development.
b. A statement describing the ultimate ownership and
maintenance of all parts of the development including
streets, structures and open space.
c. The total anticipated population to occupy the planned
unit development, with breakdowns as to the number of
school age children, adults and families.
(E) Final Development Plan Specifications : The final development
plan filed with the Zoning Officer shall contain in final form
all of the information required in the preliminary development
plan.
(F) Findings Required : The findings necessary for approval of the
preliminary and final development plans shall be based on the
following and describe in what respect the plan would or would
not be in the public interest.
• 1. The plan is not in conflict with the Farmington Comprehensive
Plan.
2. The plan is designed to form a desireable and unified
development within its own boundaries.
3. The proposed uses will not be detrimental to present and
future land uses in the surrounding area.
4. Any exceptions to the standard requirements of the zoning
and subdivision ordinances are justified by the design of the
development.
5. The plan will not create an excessive burden on parks,
schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities
which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development.
6. The planned development will not have an undue and adverse
impact on the reasonable enjoyment of neighboring property.
(G) Zoning : Once the proposed plan has been approved, the Planning
Commission shall propose an ammendment to the Zoning Map for
action by the Village Council, as outlined in Chapter 12 of the
Zoning Ordinance. The planned unit development shall be
outlined on the official zoning map and labeled Y.U.D.
•
(H) Annual Review: The Planning Commission shall review all
Planed Unit Development districts within the Village at
lease once each year and shall make a report to the Village
Council on the status of the development in each of the
Planned Unit Development districts. If the Village Council
finds that development has not occurred within a reasonable
time after the original approval, the Village Council may
instruct the Planning Commission to initiate rezoning to the
original zoning district by removing the Planned Unit
Development district from the official zoning map.
• j .
•
•
CHAPTER 2
ZONING MAP; DISTRICTS
SECTION
10-2-2 : Zoning Districts :
Residential Districts
"R-A" Agricultural District
"R-1" Suburban District
"R-2" Urban District
Multiple District
CHANTER 3
RESIDENTIAL DISTRI CTS
•
10-3-1: Purpose:
(A) "R-A", the Agricultural District is designated for
for land where central water and sewer facilities are not
now available and the installation of these facilities is
of low priority. It is primarily an agricultural area
within the Village that should remain for the forseeable
future .
(B) t'R-1"
( C) "R-2"
(D) "R-311, the Multiple District, is designated for land
which should be devoted to high density developments
including apartments, town houses and planned unit develop-
ments. This district represents a more intensive use of
land than would be permitted in the other "R" districts.
•
• CHAPTER 7
PERMITTED USES
10-7-1: Permitted Uses :
R-A Agricultural Districts
1. Agriculture 1. Home Occupation
2. Single Family Dwellings 2. Commercial Recreational Uses
3 . Two-Family Dwellings 3. Public Buildings
4. Travel Trailer Storage 4. Public Utility Buildings
5. Public Parks and Play- 5. Water and SewaEe Treatment
;rounds Plants
6. ublic and Parochial 6. Sanitary Land Fills
Schools 7 . Cemeteries
7 . Golf Courses 8. Mineral Extraction
8. Specialized Animal Raising 9. Radio and T.V. Stations
9. Stables and Riding 10. Water Recreation and Water
Academies Storage
10. Churches
11. Greenhouses and
Nurseries
. 12. Essential Services
13. Accessory Uses
R-1 Suburban District
( change wording) 5. Hospitals and Clinics
9. Public Buildings
11. Planned Unit Development
13. Mobile Home Parks
14. Townhouses
R-2 Urban District
( change wording) 6. Hospitals and Clinics
11. Public Buildings
13. Planned Unit Development
14. Mobile Home Parks
15. Townhouses
R-3 Multiple District
1. Single Family Dwellings 1. Nursing Homes
2. Two-Family Dwellings 2. Hospitals & Clinics
3. Multiple-Family Dwellings 3. Public Utility Buildings
4. Townhouses 4. Fire Stations
• 5. Public & Parochial Schools 5. Public Buildings
6. Public Parks & Playgrounds 6. Private Clubs
7 . Churches 7 . Planned Unit Development
I-1 Light Industrial
6. Agriculture
CHAPTER 8
LOT AND YARD REQUIREYIENTS
• 10-8-2 LOT AND YARD REgUtREMENTS:
R-A R-1 R-2 R-3
Minimum Lot Area ( sq. ft . ).
off-lot sewer and water 80,000 10,000 7, 200 10,000
off-lot sewer or water 80,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
on-lot sewer and water 80,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
Minimum Lot Area/Family ( sq .ft. )
off-lot sewer and water 80,000 35500 1, 800 1,200
off-lot sewer or water 80,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
on-lot sewer and water 80,000 11-0,000 20,000 20,000
Minimum Lot Width ( sq. ft. )
off-lot sewer and water 200 75 60 75
. off-lot sewer or water 200 100 100 100
on-lot sewer and water 200 200 150 150
Minimum Death Front Yard (feet) 30 30 30 30
Minimum Width Side Yard (feet) 25 10 6 10
B-1 B-2 B-3 -1-1 C-1
Minimum Lot Area (sq. ft. )
off-lot sewer and water 10,000 5,000 5,000 40,000 80,000
• off-lot sewer or water 20,000 20,000 203000 80,000 80,000
on-lot sewer and water 40,000 40,000 40,000 80,000 80,000
Minimum Lot Area/Family (sq . ft. ) -
off-lot sewer and water -- 1,800 -- -- 80,000
off-lot sewer or water -- 10,000 -- - 80,000
on-lot sewer and water -- 20,000 --- -- 80,000
Minimum Lot Width (feet)
off-lot sewer and water 75 50 50 150 200
off-lot sewer or water 100 100 100 200 200 -
on-lot sewer and water 150 150 150 200 200
Minimum Depth Front Yard (feet) 30 0 10 40 30
Minimum Width Side Yard (feet) 10 0 6 25 25
•
CHAPTER 10
• GENERAL REGULATIONS
10-10-5 : PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT : To help encourage a more
creative approach to the use of land, departures from the Zoning
Ordinance may be granted by the Village Council in Planned Unit
Development Districts designated on the official Zoning Map.
Permission to develop specific parcels of land under the provisions
which follow, shall be binding on all construction. Any proposed
change in the development plan after approval by the Village Councii
shall be resubmitted for consideration. The land use minimum
lot area, yard, height and accessory uses determined by the planned
unit development requirements shall prevail over conflicting require-
ments listed elsewhere within this Zoning Ordinance or in the
Farmington Subdivision Ordinance.
(A) Preliminary Development Plan Procedure : An applicant for a
planned unit development shall submit a preliminary development
plan to the Zoning Officer with a written statement and a
certified check or money order, in an amount of not less than
twenty five (625.00) dollars or more than two hundred (4200.00)
dollars to cover the costs incurred in checking and processing
such plans .
1. Within 60 days after the filing of the preliminary plan
• with the Zoning Officer, the Planning Commission shall forward
the plan to the Village Council with a written report recom-
mending that the plan be disapproved, approved, or approved
with modifications stating the reasons for these recommendations.
2. Within 45 days after the receipt of the application by the
Village Council a public hearing shall be held by the Village
Council on the application. The Village Council may continue
the hearing or refer the matter back to the Planning Commission
for further study, provided, however, that the public hearing or
hearings shall be concluded within 45 days after the date of the
first public hearing, unless the applicant shall consent in
writing to an extension of the time. Upon conclusion of all
hearings the Village Council shall within 30 days make and file
findings and cause a copy thereof to be mailed to the applicant.
3. In the event tentative approval is granted subject to
conditions, the applicant shall, within 45 days after receiving
a copy of the findings of the Village Councii, notify the Village
Council of the acceptance or refusal of all conditions. Refusal
of the applicant shall constitute denial of the plans by the
Village Council. Failure of the land owner to notify the Village
Council of his. aeceptance or refusal of the conditions to the
plan, constitute acceptance of the conditions.
•
•
(B) Final Development Plan Procedure : Within six months following
the approval of the preliminary development plan, the applicant
shall file with the Zoning Officer a final development plan
containing in final form the information required in the prelim-
inary plan. The Village Council at its discretion may extend
for six months the period for filing of the final development
plan.
1. The Zoning Officer shall send a reproducible print and one
other print to the Chairman of the Village Planning Commission.
If the Planning; Commission finds that the final plan is in
substantial compiia:nce with the plan given preliminary approval,
it shall endorse the plan and submit it to the Village Council
within 30 days.
2. A public hearing on an application for final approval of the
plan or part thereof shall not be required provided that the
plan is in substantial compliance with the plan given preliminary
approval.
3. in the event the plan as submitted for final approval is not
in substantial compliance with the preliminary plan, the Village
Council shall notify the applicant within 45 days of the date
• of application setting forth ways in which the pian is not in
substantial compliance.
a. The applicant may treat such notification as denial of
final approval : or
b. The applicant may refile his plan so that it does
substantially comply with the preliminary plan: or
c. The applicant may file a written request with the Village
Council that it hold a public hearing on his request for
final approval. Any such hearing shall be held within 30
days after the request for such a hearing. Within —5 days
of such hearing the Village Council shall either grant final
approval or deny final approval to the plan.
4- If the Village Council fails to act, within the time
prescribed, the applicant may, after 20 days written notice
to the Village Council, file a complaint with any court of
local jurisdiction. Upon showing that the Village Council has
failed to act within the time prescribed, the court can enter
an order directing the County Registrar of Deeds to record the
plan as submitted for final approval without the approval of the
Village Council.
•
5. In the event a plan is given final approval and the
applicant shall abandon said plan or in the event the appli-
cant shall fail to begin construction of the planned unit
development within 18 months after final approval has been
granted, final approval shall terminate unless such time period
is extended by the Village Council.
(C) General Requirements : In a planned unit development the
following regulations should be considered prior to the
submission of a preliminary development plan.
1. Ownership:,: The tract of land shall be under unified control
at the time of application and scheduled to be developed as one
unit.
2. Minimum Size : No planned unit development may include less
than five acres of contiguous land.
3. Minimum Building Spacing: Any buildings exceeding the
height limits permitted in the surrounding district shall be
so located as to eliminate the possibility of casting unbroken
shadows on adjoining parcels .
• 4. Harmony: The ;Manned unit development should be planned and
developed to harmonize with both existing and proposed devel-
opments in the area surrounding the project.
5. Permitted Uses : The permitted uses may include :
a. Any combination of dwelling; units in single family,
two family, town or row houses and apartments .
b. Any non-residential use, to the extent such non-residential
use is designed and intended to serve the residents of the
planned unit development.
C. Public and private education facilities.
d. Other uses permitted in the Zoning District in which
the planned unit development is located.
6. Open Spaces : A minimum of twenty percent for private or
public open air recreational uses protected by adequate covenants
running with the land or by conveyances or dedications as the
Planning Commission shall specify shall be an integral part of
the plan. Such open space shall not include space devoted to
streets, parking and private yard space.
•
•
7 . Density: An increase in density may be all-owed under the
following conditions provided that traffic patterns will not
be adversely affected and that public facilities are adequate .
s.. For undeveloped common open space, a maximum increase
of five percent.
b. For distinctiveness and excellence in siting, design,
and landscaping, a maximum increase of five percent.
(D) Preliminary Development Plan Specifications : An applicant shall
submit to the Zoning Officer the preliminary development plan
which shall be composed of drawings and a written statement.
1. The drawings may be in schematic form and must contain the
following:
a. The location, size of site and the proposed uses of the
land to be developed.
b. The density of land use to be allocated to the several
parts of the site to be developed.
• c. The location and size of all common open space and the
form of organization to own and maintain such space.
d. The use, height, bulk and approximate location of
buildings and other structures.
e. The plans for the distribution of sanitary wastes and
storm water.
f. The plans for parking of vehicles and the location and
width of proposed streets.
g. A schedule showing the proposed times within which
application for final approval of all sections of the
planned unit development are intended to be filled.
h. A topographic map prepared by a registered civil
engineer or land surveyor covering the entire tract
proposed for development. Such maps shall be drawn at
a scale of 1" = 100 ' and shall indicate topography at a
two foot contour interval. It shall show in accurate detail
the topography, existing buildings, land features and trees.
•
2. The written statement shall include the following :
a. An explanation of the general character of the planned
unit development.
b. A statement describing the ultimate ownership and
maintenance of all parts of the development including
streets, structures and open space.
c. The total anticipated population to occupy the planned
unit development, with breakdowns as to the number of
school age children, adults and families.
(E) Final Development Plan Specifications : The final development
plan filed with the Zoning Officer shall contain in final form
all of the information required in the preliminary development
plan.
(F) Findings Required : The findings necessary for approval of the
preliminary and final development plans shall be based on the
following and describe in what respect the plan would or would
not be in the public interest.
• 1. The plan is not in conflict with the Farmington Comprehensive
Plan.
2. The plan is designed to form a desireable and unified
development within its own boundaries.
3. The proposed uses will not be detrimental to present and
future land uses in the surrounding area..
4. Any exceptions to the standard requirements of the zoning
and subdivision ordinances are justified by the design of the
development.
5. The plan will not create an el,.cessive burden on parks,
schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities
which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development.
6. The planned development will not have an undue and adverse
impact on the reasonable enjoyment of neighboring; property.
(G) Zoning : Once the proposed plan has been approved, the Planning
Commission shall propose an ammendment to the Zoning Map for
action by the Village Council, as outlined in Chapter 12 of the
Zoning Ordinance. `.i'he planned unit development shall be
outlined on the official zoning map and labeled Y.U.D.
(H) Annual Review: The Pianning Commission shall review all
Planned Unit Development districts within the Village at
lease once each year and shall make a report to the Village
Council on the status of the development in each of the
Planned Unit Development districts. If the Village Council
finds that development has not occurred within a reasonable
time after the original approval, the Village Council may
instruct the Planning Commission to initiate rezoning to the
original zoning district by removing the Planned Unit
Development district from the official zoning map.
55
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
OCTOBER 14, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Rademacher.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Members Nicolai and Shirley
Absent: Members Rotty and Sifferath.
Also present: William Ford
Motion by Nicolai, second by Shirley that a height variance be granted to
John Devney for construction of a silo at his farm. Voting for: Rademacher,
Nicolai, Shirley. Voting against: None. Excused: Rotty and Sifferath.
Motion carried.
Motion by Shirley, second by Nicolai that an off-street parking variance be
granted to the VFW at 209-211 Oak Street. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai,
Shirley. Voting against: None. Excused: Rotty and Sifferath. Motion carried.
The Commission briefly discussed the theory of zero lot line set backs for
condominium duplexes having a party wall. It was agreed to discuss it further
after checking with Bloomington as to the Administration problem.
The Commission set their regular meetings, starting with October 26, 1971 for
the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month.
Commissioner Sifferath arrived at 7:40 P.M.
Mr. Howard Hafner again appeared regarding his request for a building permit
and the controversy of whether or not a non-conforming use existed and had not
been abandoned and if so whether his proposed changes were an expansion of
same. He agreed to return to the meeting of October 26, 1971 with a scale
drawing showing the areas which were used as of November 16, 1970 and the
areas he proposed to use.
Motion by Sifferath, second by Shirley that a bill from Planner Tooker in the
amount of $600.00 be approved. Voting for: Rademacher, Nicolai, Shirley,
Sifferath. Voting against: None. Excused: Rotty. Motion carried.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
57
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
OCTOBER 26, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by the Chairman
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Members Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath.
Absent: Member Nicolai
Motion by Sifferath, second by Rotty that the minutes of October 14, 1971,
be approved as presented. Voting for Rademacher, Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath.
Voting against: None. Absent: Nicolai. Motion carried.
Mr. Howard Haffner appeared in regard to his request for a building permit
at his residence, 19618 Pilot Knob Road. There has been a running controversy
as to whether a continuing non-conforming use had been established and not
abandoned since the date of annexation, Novermber 16, 1970. Mr. Haffner pre-
sented a hand drawn sketch of his land showing the area he claimed he had
continued to use. Motion by Shirley, second by Sifferath that the Board of
Adjustment finds that a non-conforming use was established on the land in
question, that it was not abandoned, that it be confined to the area described
on the sketch, that the continuing non-conforming use be formalized by the
issuance of special exception #71-23, that the sketch be attached to the file
copy of the special exception and become a part of the permanent file. Further,
that the non-conforming use be restricted to auto sales and pre-sale auto
servicing. Voting for: Rademacher, Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath. Voting against:
None. Absent: Nicolai. Motion carried.
_Motion by Sifferath, second by Rotty that building permit application #71-66B
by Howard Haffner for a used car sales office and grading be denied on the 1
grounds that it would be a change to a continuing non-conforming use and
therefore prohibited under ordinance #10-10-1 (A) . Voting for: Rademacher,
Rotty, Shirley, Sifferath. Voting against: None. Absent: Nicolai. Motion
carried.
The Planning Commission asked the Administrator to give them a memo concerning
pay and or expenses for Planning Commission members.
The Planning Commission reviewed the Bloomington zoning ordinance permitting
condominium duplexes. They asked the Administrator to check with other
municipalities as to how zero lot line condominiums for townhouses and apartments
are handled.
Motion made and seconded to adjourn at 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
59
MINUTES
PLANNING COWISSION
REGULAR
NOVEMBER 9, 1971
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Rademacher.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Members Nicolai, Rotty, Shirley and Sifferath.
The Commission was informed of the intention of Mr. Dallas Haas to construct
32 units of multiple dwellings on the west side of Centennial Drive between
Park Drive and Heritage Way. His proposal met all of the requirements of the
zoning ordinance and therefore required no action on the part of the Commission.
Zero lot line variances for duplexes were discussed. This matter was laid over
to the next meeting.
Control of Billboards was discussed. The Administrator was instructed to pre-
pare proposed amendments which would allow billboards in the following locations;
10-7-1 (A) - Add No. 14 - Billboards (R-A)
10-7-1 (H) - Add No. 9 - Billboards (I-1)
10-7-1 (I) - Add No. 6 - Billboards (C-1)
4-3-12 (B) - 3 Add the words "Nor shall it be located closer than 300 feet
to any dwelling". (Or R or B zone district)
4-3-12 (B) - 4 This section exempts from chapter 7 of the zoning ordinance
all groung signs when located in an area abutting either a
County road or State Highway Right of Way.
Motion made and carried that the Commission stand adjourned at 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Warren Sifferath
Member
61
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
NOVEMBER 23, 1971
The meeting was called to order by the Vice-Chairman Warren Sifferath at 7:30 P.M.
Present: Sifferath, Nicolai, Rotty and Shirley.
Absent: Rademacher.
Also present: Mayor Kleinsasser, Administrator Ford.
Motion by Shirley, second by Nicolai, that the minutes of November 9 be amended
as to billboards to show the Planning Commission as recommending billboards
as a permitted use in R-A, I-1 and C-1 Zoning Districts and as a special excetion
in any district within 200 L.F. of the right-of-way of either a State Highway
or County Road. Voting for: Sifferath, Nicolai, Shirley. Voting against:
None. Absent: Rademacher, Rotty. Motion carried.
Motion by Rotty, second by Shirley that the Planning Commission be on record
as having no objections in principal to the idea of zero side lot set backs
for duplexes so long as the Council satisfies themselves that adequate
administrative safeguards can be erected. Voting for: Sifferath, Rotty,
Shirley. Voting against: Nicolai. Absent: Rademacher. Motion carried.
The Planning Commission conducted an advisory meeting for review of preliminary
intentions of the Developers of the Mobile Home Park proposed for the Stegmaier
property. They would complete their plans and get on a future agenda for the
preliminary plat review.
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 9:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
DECEMBER 28, 1971
(This meeting was posponed from December 14, 1971.)
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rademcacher at 7:45 P.M.
Present: Chairman Rademacher, Commissioners Rotty, Shirley and Nicolai.
Also present: Administrator Ford
Mr. Peter Moore, of the Wall Corporation and Mr. Robert Stegmaier, Jr.
appeared at the continued advisory meeting regarding the proposed Mobile
Home Park in Section 13. In reviewing the tentative sketch of the Mobile
Home Park layout, the Commission looked upon it favorably with the
following recommended changes:
(a) Provide for a public street dedication of 70 ft. right of
way running North and South approximately midway East & West.
(b) Provide for a public street dedication of 35 ft. right of
way North and South on the East end (Z of future street) .
Motion made and carried to adjourn at 9:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Ford
Village Administrator