Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-08-19 CITY OF Meeting Location: FARMI NGTON Farmington City Hall 430 Third Street "r..91 ��' Farmington, MN 55024 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA October 8, 2019 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (a) Approve Planning Commission minutes 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) Variance request from Section 10-6-4(D) of the City Code allowing an access drive within a commercial district wider than 30 feet-321 Elm Street (b) Variance request from Section 10-6-6(A) of the City Code to allow an accessory structure(shed)to be located closer than 10 feet to an existing structure-520 Main Street (c) Application for an amendment to a previously approved conditional use permit to expand the commercial recreational use in an existing building and to allow for a 24- hour access gym component-21210 Eaton Avenue (d) Second amendment to a planned unit development site plan for the Trinity Campus- 905 Elm Street (e) Application for an amendment to a previoulsy approved conditional use permit to extend the approved timeframe for completion of improvements-21040 Chippendale Avenue (f) ONG Auto, LLC-315 Pine Street Possible CUP Revocation-Continued 4. DISCUSSION (a) 2040 Comprehensive Plan update and implementation schedule (b) H PC-Certificate of Appropriateness Request for Exterior Work-345 3rd Street (Fletcher Building) 5. ADJOURN CITY OF O430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARM I N GTO N © 651.280.6800 . ® FarmingtonMN.gov TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Approve Planning Commission minutes DATE: October 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION Attached, are the minutes from the August 13, 2019 regular meeting. DISCUSSION NA ACTION REQUESTED Approve the minutes from the August 13, 2019 regular meeting ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material August 13, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting August 13,2019 1. Call to Order Chair Rotty called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Rotty, Franceschelli, Tesky, Windschitl Members Absent: None Also Present: Tony Wippler,Planning Manager 2. Approval of Minutes a. MOTON by Tesky, second by Franceschelli to approve the minutes of July 9, 2019. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 3. Discussion a. Draft Ordinance Amending Section 10-6-4 of the City Code as it Relates to Recreational Vehicle Parking This draft ordinance pertains to on-street recreational vehicle parking. Currently the city code 10-6-4(L) allows for parking of recreational vehicles on the street for a period not to exceed 72 hours. They cannot be parked on the street between April 1 and November 15 between 2:30 and 5:30 a.m. due to winter parking restrictions. Staff suggests amending this section to reference 9-1-4(F) of the police regulations. This change is proposed because of the number of complaints received about recreational vehicles being stored on streets. Staff has been working with the police department to consistently enforce on- street parking. The 72 hour provision is very hard to regulate. One way to regulate this is to not allow parking on the streets between 2:00 and 5:00 a.m. A resident can obtain a permit from the police department to park on the street for 72 hours. Only three permits per year are allowed. Mr.Andrew Null, 19664 Evergreen Trail, he agrees with the amendment,but would like to see a change. If someone uses a trailer for work,they should be exempt or maybe get a permit to show it is for work, because they might not have access to other storage. Having it for three consecutive days is fine,but having it for a total of six days is a burden with an RV. They use their RV twice a month. They take it out of Supreme Storage, fill it with water,power it up, load up the food so it is there twice a month over night and there are five to six camping months in the year. They would need 18 days total. He would like to see the written consent from the neighbors removed unless you are over the property line. The verbage of 7,000 to 15,000 lbs is confusing. Staff noted this ordinance is for commercial and recreational vehicles. Ms. Colleen Keough, 19087 Everest Path, owns an RV trailer and has received a warning ticket for parking it on the street overnight. The police said this ordinance was already in effect and that we had to call 24 hours in advance and we only get six times per summer season. They store it at Supreme Storage and pull it out the night before. They put water in it, turn on the fridge,put food in and take off the next day. It is never on the street for more than 24 hours. We are splitting hairs with the 7,000 lbs. How will you enforce that? Are they going to get out and read the verbage on the trailer to see how much it weighs? She thought we have to classify recreational vehicles and not be concerned with how much it weighs. The concern here is not the weight it is that it's an eyesore for some people. This is Minnesota. In the summer we camp, in the winter we drive snowmobiles Planning Commission Minutes August 13,2019 Page 2 down the street. At what point do we lose our right to have recreational vehicles? She is disappointed to see this. She knows there are people that push the envelope that don't have storage for their camper, but the police could tell those people. They know which vehicles are on the street every day. She is against this. Member Franceschelli asked when you have your camper on the street, do you feel that it is safely parked there? That it won't be vandalized? Or do you have other concerns about using that space in front of your property? Ms. Keough responded even if you leave your vehicle in the driveway it can get broken into. We lock it and leave our outside lights on. It is an acceptable risk. You are not replacing one code for another; they are not the same. There is different language and different rules. Staff stated it is a swap of the verbage. Ms. Keough stated but the rules would change. Staff stated the existing rules are in place, we are just referencing a different code provision. The rules are in place already. Ms. Keough stated the rule is that you can leave it on the street for 72 consecutive hours and if we replace it with the new one that would still be the case. Staff replied no. It would fall to the 9-1-4 code. Ms. Keough stated that is her point. You are not just replacing one for the other with a code number. Mr.Brett Cummings, 5168 187th Street,the question about whether I chose to leave my property, I have a small 6x10 box trailer that I use for recreational purposes. It was parked in front of his house, a kid came around the corner, blew through the stop sign, hit the trailer and it is probably totaled. He still likes to be able to park his boat out front when he is hunting and fishing. Because of an injury, it is painful to pull his boat up his driveway, but he has to do it. This is not swapping one for the other, it is a complete change. Right now we have the ability to park on the road for 72 hours. Changing it to say we only get six days annually, he might have two weeks in the summer where he goes fishing for two or three days so it sits out front. He is good about calling the city asking if it is okay. Now in the new provisions we aren't allowed to do that. He lives on a busy street, but he is still going to park his boat on the street. To take that away is extremely frustrating. It is our liability if it gets hit. He understands not having a bunch of dumpy trailers and vehicles parked on the street,but if it is a contractor coming home late and has to leave early, that stuff will happen. A resident asked for clarification regarding a vehicle in excess of 7,000 lbs or any trailer....does that mean a trailer less than 7,000 lbs is permitted? Staff stated it is any trailer. It's the vehicle that is in excess of 7,000 lbs. The resident stated both of these rules are being enforced simultaneously. They received something for their trailer that it was there in excess of 72 hours when they first purchased it and didn't know the rule. Within a matter of days their neighbor got a pink tag that references the other code. It sounds like the problem might be enforcement and not an impact to the community. He suggested a yearly permit that would allow if they see it, it can remain there for one night and if they see it a second night,the law is broken. He agreed with preparing the trailer as that is a necessity. The previous people have storage at Supreme Storage,he does not have a space there and their vehicle is parked in Cannon Falls. That is 2.5 hours just to move it. Something could be worked out where enforcement is easier such as a yearly permit fee. Mr. Merlin Reed, 199th Street,the six days a year is not enough. You are only allowed three permits per year. If that's the case, he is already over his limit. That needs to be Planning Commission Minutes August 13,2019 Page 3 wiped out. Regarding neighbor permission, what does that mean? Do the people across the street get a say in this also? Staff stated only if it is parked across the street, otherwise,the adjacent neighbors. Mr. Reed asked how that works? Staff did not know. Mr. Reed feels that is not workable. Regarding getting the permit,there are times where they come home late and the hours for the police department are over. He understood you have to give them 24 hours to get the permit. It would be nice to do this electronically as he doesn't know exactly what day he is coming back. He would rather not see a permit during the summer; the winter is fine. To require a permit during peak recreational months will be a nightmare for everyone. Mr. John Rosenberg, 19955 English Court, besides having a camper and they go camping five times a years so it is there one or two days prior to camping, having three events per year is not enough. He goes fishing twice a week. You ticketed everyone in Farmington and said they need to move their boats off their lawn and get storage. So he stores it on Akin Road. He is on the lake at 6:00 a.m. You cannot get your boat out of there until 6:30 a.m. So he picks up the boat the night before,preps it, hooks it up to his truck and parks it in front of his driveway, so now that can't happen either. The other problem is, is there a cost to get the permit? Staff did not think so. Mr. Rosenberg asked about the hours of the police department,which are 8:00 am to 4:30 pm. He works during that time, so how is he supposed to get the permit? This is a bad decision and he knows for a fact you don't hold people accountable to the law already,because I've had my camper in the road for four days. He did not know about the three day stipulation. He lives right by the police department and no one has ever stopped by. So what's wrong with holding people accountable to the law that is in place? Ms.Nicole Boe, 19854 Embers Avenue, it is not just a few people that are upset. It is not just 20 people that found the time to get here. It is important that you realize it affects a lot more than just the 20 people that are here. They were not able to get storage in Farmington and they have an RV stored in Inver Grove Heights. It is not as simple as going five minutes to get it. Their camper needs to be filled with water, charge the battery, etc. They are very respectful of their neighbors and they have no problems. They park in front of their house and pull a little bit onto their grass so they aren't in the road. They are there for enough time to load and unload as well. For permits, if we went on a trip for seven days, we would be looking at two permits just for one trip; on the front end for overnight to load and a permit on the back end to have it sit overnight when we get home. We got home at 9:00 p.m., unloaded the next day, and put it back in storage. That leaves one permit she can't do anything with because she can't get another permit for the return trip. Asking neighbors for permission to park in front of your house; she has a nice camper so why is she asking her neighbors for permission to park a nice vehicle in front when someone can bring an old, beat up truck and park it in front of her house and not ask if she is okay with it. What is aesthetically pleasing to you, maybe is not to me. They have had a camper for 12 years. She has two police officers that live in their neighborhood. They have not gotten a ticket and they weren't even aware of this. It is clear for someone who doesn't have storage and is storing in the streets versus someone who is bringing their camper in and letting it sit there for a night or two. It is just the city doing their due diligence. Her husband's truck is licensed as a commercial vehicle,but he doesn't use it as a commercial truck. So he can't park his truck in the street because it is considered a commercial pickup? But the neighbor can park an F150 in the street that looks exactly the same, except for the weight. She doesn't understand Planning Commission Minutes August 13,2019 Page 4 enforcing that. She saw on social media, don't park in the street,park in the driveway. Her driveway is 15 ft long on a steep hill. A camper needs to be level and balanced. She can't park a camper in a slanted driveway or she would. As far as vandalism in the street, that is a risk they are willing to take for their family convenience. She wanted the commission to realize they are affecting a lot of people by this. Mr. Jake Pingly, 18603 Dylan Drive, agreed with all the comments said. A few bad apples are going to spoil it for everyone and that is unfortunate. If we are having a hard time enforcing the 72 hours,how can we enforce the permits? For the most part we have a clean city. We keep the campers on the street when we need them,we pull them out when we use them. Will this create more of a let's build a pad at our house and if we can squeeze it in there next to our house,we will do that. If we can't leave it in storage and bring it overnight, now we need to keep it at our house. It will create more clutter in the neighborhoods. It is cleaner not having that. Mr. Chad Hird, 4832 189th Street W, one thing he likes about Farmington is the leniency in the laws. Empire doesn't have any stipulations on RV's, but he wants to keep his kids here. They love to go camping every year. He keeps his camper at Supreme Storage,but like everyone else, he pulls it out a day in advance to load and charge batteries. His driveway is on a steep hill and cannot physically hook up to it, so he keeps it on the street. He has never had any infractions with the city and never gotten any complaints. If this were to change,he might have to make other arrangements, such as a side pad by his garage, which he can't do because of an easement or maybe just get rid of the camper. RV's are a very popular thing now. Unless you have a complaint from a neighbor, in which they should be able to work it out,he doesn't think we should make any changes to the current policy. Ms. Kari Sanders, 5078 185th Street W,they love the hometown atmosphere. There is some confusion about when you can get the permits. They started getting tickets in June with warnings for their camper and their neighbor for their boat. We never had a problem before. They got a permit for the next camping trip. Even though she had a permit, she still got a warning from the police department. For the next camping trip,the neighbor got a permit, Ms. Sanders didn't. The lady said no,we are all done with that. Her husband took pictures of three other campers around town that got their permits at the same time. She wants consistency and make sure everyone knows. If it is going to change, it should not be because you have a squeaky neighbor. Ms. Becky Moody, 5166 198th Street W,has a nice camper and a large front yard, but she does live on a hill and cannot pull her camper into her driveway. She only uses the camper three or four times and keeps it in storage. They park it within their property lines. Out of six houses, five of us have campers. We all do the same thing with storage and prepping the camper. She received a warning in June, so got a permit. She didn't know about the 72 hours. She is concerned if in two weeks she will get a ticket. If others are parked on the street, as long as she can get in and out, she is okay with it. Mr.Ed Dombeck, 5157 203rd Ct W, asked if it will be discriminated against RV's and lawn service companies that pull a 30 ft.trailer? Will there be a difference in the rules to be followed? Staff stated in this instance we are just talking about recreational vehicles. If the commercial vehicle is in violation of the code,then yes the police would deal with Planning Commission Minutes August 13,2019 Page 5 that. This specifically is only dealing with recreational vehicles. Mr. Dombeck didn't understand; if it is in violation of this new code,the police will have it moved? Lakeville has explicit rules. The RV and commercial rules for parking on the street should be separated. The RV population has more concern for maintaining where they put their vehicles and concern for their neighbors than the folks that run businesses and getting out and not worrying about where they park. He has had this problem for a couple years where he can't back out because of this huge truck and trailer in back of his driveway. It's parked there all day and then late in the afternoon he takes it out to do some work. It is also an inconvenience when a diesel truck comes by, 9:00 at night blowing their stack. There has to be some mechanism to segregate RV's and boats comparable to other types of vehicles. Staff stated for off-street parking we have a separate commercial vehicle code under 10-6-4. Mr. Andrew Null, 19664 Evergreen Trail, based on what was just said, the current code, says recreational vehicles, campers,RV's,boats, etc. The code you want to replace it with just says trailer. It doesn't say recreational vehicles. You said this change was based on a number of complaints the city received. What percentage of the population does it take to generate this change? If he gets enough people to call,voicing opposition, how many does it take? Staff did not have an answer. A resident asked why are we here tonight? Who authored this change? Staff is suggesting it with input from the police department and administration. A resident asked what are the arguments to create this? Staff replied to create a system where we can have better enforcement of on-street parking for recreational vehicles. They were based on public complaints and from staff seeing the number of these vehicles on the street. Ms.Amy Holmes, 18636 Dunbury Avenue, she has been camping for 40 years and has had a camper for ten years. She sometimes parks in the street to pack up. Her problem is the consistency. In the ten years they have never gotten a notice. A couple months ago something must have happened that you are going to enforce these rules. However, one neighbor received a letter, a couple days later they got a pink slip stuck on the camper from the police department. The ordinance was different language than what the pink slip said. What direction are we going? Can we actually try to enforce the 72 hour rule? Ten years and we never got a notice until one week she gets a pink slip and the neighbor gets a letter. She would like to see the 72 hours enforced before you make drastic changes. A resident stated if we are only given three permits for six days,what are the options for those that do have boats and camp and fish and travel a lot. Is there the ability to get additional days or can't we camp and boat anymore? She would have those permits used up by the end of May. How much is the fine? If it's minimal, she would rather pay the fine than get the permits. Maybe an option is an annual permit to generate money for the city. You have a recreational vehicle, you put it on your hitch or window,police see the permit and they could still enforce the 72 hours. Six days is clearly not enough. What are our options after that point? How do you let a few complaints suddenly change the whole dynamic of something that has been working? She doesn't see RV's and boats cluttering the neighborhoods. Camping and boating is very popular right now. Neighbors are pulling them in and out. If you do enforcement,what are other options? Planning Commission Minutes August 13,2019 Page 6 Ms. Wendy White, 18467 Echo Drive,the yearly permit for a boat or camper or both is a great idea. You will clear out the offenders that don't want to pay that and you will fine the ones that abuse the privilege of parking on the street. Chair Rotty stated residents have brought up some great comments and suggestions. Information such as driveway slope, etc. hadn't been considered. Commission members will now ask their questions. This is a draft ordinance. No action will be taken tonight. We certainly have a lot to think about. Member Windschitl,there was a question as to how police will know the vehicle weight. Police can run the license plate and see what the weight is. He knew the police are currently enforcing it, but is it also code enforcement? Staff stated in the past yes, but the police have been more proactive. Member Windschitl has noticed on social media people are complaining about code enforcement being out there with sprinklers,parking tickets, RV tickets. He wondered if the inconsistency and the message being delivered is inaccurate between the police and code enforcement. Staff stated all of the warnings were from the police. Member Windschitl stated the important thing is consistency with the police and code enforcement. He liked the yearly permit idea. One concern is the safety of parking these RV's and boats on roads. You do get the big campers parked on narrow streets. If there is an emergency, you get the fire trucks,police, family coming. He has seen extension cords across sidewalks and just the ability to see around the bigger RV's. Overall we have a good perspective as to what people want. Member Tesky thanked everyone for coming and their comments. Summers are short and we don't have a lot of time to enjoy our families. For her it is more about safety concerns. When there are big RV's parked on the streets,you can't see oncoming cars. Adjacent property owners do park in front of neighbor's properties. The consent of neighbors is very important. The logistics of six days for a permit is difficult, so the annual permit does make more sense. Member Franceschelli, asked staff to look at section I of the code and asked why does the city have to require something twice. It says "anticipated needs may be required by the city for land banking if required by the city." Either we are going to require it or not. Chair Rotty stated it can be clarified later and is not part of this discussion. Member Franceschelli stated dealing with the trailer weights, last time he looked at recreational vehicles they were listed by classification; class 1 to class 5. Instead of worrying about weight,why not list it by class. Regarding permitting, forget this three day permit and go to an annual permit. Put it in the fee schedule for a revenue stream. Those that want to abide by the rules and enjoy camping and boating will gladly come forth and do it because they enjoy it and take pride in it. He has yet to see an RV that has been dilapidated, run down or not cared for. These are not cheap entertainment. We talked about work trailers. Those are commercial trailers and shouldn't be considered in this. He has seen several large fifth wheel assemblies parked in front of properties. They are very considerate about their neighbors. They are not loading and unloading at early hours in the morning. He does not agree with the 2:00 am to 5:00 am hours. He is not going out at 2:00 am to move his trailer just to satisfy the community. It makes no sense. If we can't get some consistency in enforcement between all parties then you might as well take these efforts and shred them and start over. Planning Commission Minutes August 13,2019 Page 7 A resident stated safety is 24 hours a day. For us to bring these coaches at 10:00 am, if there is a safety hazard, it is there now. The only way you can address safety is to ban all recreational vehicles in the neighborhoods. Anything parked on the street will be an issue. Chair Rotty stated this is an important topic for our residents. He complimented the residents; you were all very well prepared with your comments. We are not in a hurry. If we are changing an ordinance,we want to do it right the first time. We have heard very good comments that we need to review. If there is to be a permitting process,there needs to be some clarity. Having to have a permit for a day or three days, maybe there is a way to simplify it. A neighbor shouldn't determine whether you can park something in front of your property. There are some things between staff and the police to look into. He understood the safety issue. Staff should continue working on this with the police chief to modify this draft ordinance based on resident comments. Staff stated if we bring something back, it will be in another draft form. As far as a timeline, it will take as long as it needs to take. A resident asked what are we supposed to do between now and October? Staff stated parking for 72 consecutive hours is on the books now without a permit. Staff can put a notice on the website and through social media when this will be discussed again. 4. Adjourn MOTION by Franceschelli, second by Windschitl to adjourn at 8:15 p.m. APIF,MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, Cov►.th%A Muller Cynthia Muller Administrative Assistant CITY OF 0430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARM I N GTO N © 651-280-6800 � ® � FarmingtonMN.gov TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Variance request from Section 10-6-4 (D) of the City Code allowing an access drive within a commercial district wider than 30 feet-321 Elm Street DATE: October 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION Eric Zeimet of EZ Property Management, LLC has applied for a variance from Section 10-6-4(D)of the city code for purposes of widening an existing access drive. The subject property is located at 321 Elm Street. Planning Division Review Applicant: EZ Property Management, LLC 321 Elm Street Farmington, MN 55024 Property Address: 321 Elm Street Attachments: 1. Variance Application 2. Topographic Survey and Removal Plan 3. Site Plan/Grading and Drainage Plan 4. Landscape and Lighting Plan Existing Zoning: B-2 (Downtown Business) 2030 Comprehensive Plan: Commercial Variance Request: to allow an access drive greater than 30 feet in width in a commercial district. DISCUSSION EZ Auto is proposing an expansion to their business located at 321 Elm Street. The expansion consists of a 2,520 square foot building addition as well as parking on the north end building. A conditional use permit was approved on June 11, 2019 for this expansion. The original plan that was contemplated with the CUP in June showed a 66 foot wide access off of 4th Street. This would have substantially increased the width of this access from its existing width of 33 feet. Mr. Zeimet was informed at that time that the access along 4th Street would either have to be reduced or kept at the 33 feet or a variance would have to be applied for and approved by the Planning Commission to allow the wider access drive. As shown on the attached revised site plan the proposed access drive off of 4th Street is shown to be 50 feet 6 inches in width. Section 10-6-4(D)of the City Code states that access drives shall be limited to 30 feet in width at the right-of-way line along local streets. The request is a variance of 20 feet 6 inches to allow the 50 foot 6 inch wide access off of 4th Street. The Planning Commission shall not approve any variance unless they find "practical difficulties" as defined in City Code exist using the following criteria: 1. Because the particular physical surroundings, or shape, configuration,topography, or other conditions of the specified parcel of land involved, strict adherence to the regulations of this title would cause practical difficulties. The wider access drive will allow the operation to better facilitate customer access to their facility. The lot being a corner lot with also an alley on a third side creates some challenges for laying out the site. It is more appropriate in this instance to widen an existing access then to create new or additional accesses to provide access to their work bays. 2. That the variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. That the variance would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this title. It is staff's belief that the variance would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this title. 4. The conditions upon which the variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not applicable,generally,to other properties within the same zoning classification. The property is bordered by right-of-way on three sides and this is generally unique. Allowing the one wider access is more appropriate than allowing multiple smaller accesses off of 4th Street. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this title and has not been created by any persons presently having any interest in the parcel of land. The difficulty is caused by the adopted maximum access drive width provision of the Zoning Code and was not brought on by actions of the person having interest in the property. 6. The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality or be injurious to other property within the vicinity in which the parcel of land is located or substantially diminish property values. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality or will be injurious to other property within the vicinity. The variance will not substantially diminish surrounding property values. 7. The proposed variance will not substantially increase congestion of the public streets,or increase the danger of fire, or be detrimental to the public welfare or public safety. The variance will not substantially increase the congestion of the public streets,or increase the danger of fire,or be detrimental to the public welfare or public safety. 8. The requested variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the practical difficulties. This is the minimum action necessary to eliminate the practical difficulties. 9. Variances may not be approved for any use that is not allowed under this title for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located except that the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling may be authorized by variance. The subject property is zoned B- 2(Downtown Business). The use of the property as an auto repair business is allowed under a conditional use. A CUP was granted on June 11,2019. ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends approval of the variance requested to allow an access drive within a commercial district up to 50 feet 6 inches in width. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description o Backup Material Variance application D Backup Material Site Plan ❑ Backup Material Topographic Survey and Removal Plan D Backup Material Landscape and Lighting Plan City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington,Minnesota 651.280.6500•Fax 651;2280,68)9 wwu.a fannmgmn.mn us VARIANCE APPLICATION Applicant: EZ Property Management,LLC Telephone:(651) 460-2101 Fax: ( ) Address: 321 Elm Street Farmington MN 55024 Street City State Zip Code Owner: Eric Zeimet Telephone:952) 239-5902 Fax: N/A Email:zeimet22@gmail.com Address: Same as applicant Street City State Zip Code Premises Involved:321 Elm St. Farmington,MN 55024 Tax Parcel(s) 14-77000-26-120 & 14-77000-26-121 Address/Legal Description(lot,block,plat name,section,township,range) Current Zoning District6-2°Downtown Business Current Land Use Auto Service Station Specific Nature of Request/Claimed Practical Difficulties:Widen driveway to better facilitate customer access to our facility. SUBMITTAL,REOUIREMENTS 1:Proof of Ownership Copies of Site Plan Application Fee($200) Abstract/Residential List(adjoining property owners only) - Boundary/Lot Survey ::Ton-ens(Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title Required) -Le9 e- Si re of Pr ner Date Si nature of plicant Date Request Submitted to the Planning Commission on For office use only Public Hearing Set for: Advertised in Local Newspaper: Planning Commission Action: Approved Denied Fee Paid $250—City of Farmington Comments: Conditions Set: Planning division: Date: 1/1/2018 DRAFTED BY: City oFFermington 430 Third Street Farmington,MN 55024 n,,,a zct./ VARIANCE PERMIT PR S Step 1: If it is determined by the City Planner that a varian will be necessary to proceed with a development,an application must be filed along with a S plan to the City Planner. An application fee in the amount of$200 must accompany the completed application form. The City Planner will notify affected property owners of the variance request. If the fee is not paid,no action will be taken by the Planning Commission. Step 2: The applicant(s)should develop a site plan to be submitted with the application. (Site Plan requirements include the site size and location;use of adjacent land;the proposed size,bulk,use and location of buildings;the location of yards and accessory structures).Proposals may be reviewed by the Development Committee,which meets every Tuesday. Application and all relevant materials should be submitted at least three(3)weeks prior to the scheduled meeting date. Step 3: The request will be placed on the Farmington Planning Commission agenda. The Farmington Planning Commission meets on the second Tuesday of each month(special meetings are held on the fourth Tuesday if necessary and called by the Planning Commission Chair). Step 4: Planning staff will prepare a staff report for each request received. Staff reports will be provided to the Planning Commission and the applicant(s)prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Step 5: The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing. The Planning Chair will first introduce the application and staff will present their report. The Planning Chair will request if the applicant(s)has any additional comments to add to the report. The Commission will review and consider a variance in which a hardship is claimed by the property owner that is in relation to the property. A hardship claim can not be monetary. The Board of Adjustment may vary the regulations of this Title if all of the following requirements are met: 1. Because the particular physical surroundings,or the shape,configuration,topography,or other conditions of the specific parcel of land involved,strict adherence to the regulations of this Title would cause undue hardship. Economic consideration alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of this Title. 2. The conditions upon which a variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not applicable,generally,to other properties within the same zoning classification. 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Title and has not been created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land. 4. The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality or be injurious to other property in the vicinity in which the parcel of land is located or substantially diminish property values. 5. The proposed variance will no substantially increase the congestion of the public streets,or increase the danger of fire,or be detrimental to the public welfare or public safety. 6. The requested variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the hardship. The Commission will vote to approve,deny,approve with conditions or table each request. The Planning Commission will attach conditions to their recommendation of approval to ensure that a proposal will not negatively affect surrounding property owners. All actions taken by the Planning Commission are final. The applicant or petitioners may choose to file an appeal to be heard by the City Council. Step 6: If the variance is approved,the applicant may then apply for a building permit to be reviewed by the City Building Inspector. The City Clerk will record the application with Dakota County Property Records. Property Card Parcel ID Number 14-77000-26-120 Owner Information Fee Owner EZ PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC Mailing Address 321 ELM ST - - FARMINGTON MN 55024 _ 'r Property Address Address 321 ELM ST � Municipality • • FARMINGTON Parcel Information Last Qualified Sale 03/22/2017 Total Acres 0.20 Sale Value $140,000.00 RNV Acres Uses COMMERCIAL Water Acres PREFERRED Plat TOWN OF FARMINGTON Lot and Block 12 26 Tax Description S 5 FT OF E 1/2 OF LOT 11 BLK 26&S 95 FT OF 2019 Building Characteristics(payable 2020)* Building Type SERVC GAR Year Built 2017 Bedrooms 0 Building Style Foundation Sq Ft NOT APPL Bathrooms 0.00 Frame Above Grade Sq Ft Garage Sq Ft Multiple Buildings Finished Sq Ft 3,604 Other Garage Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve Open Space 192 VERMILLION RIVER NON HOMESTEAD Assessor Valuation Taxable Estimated 2019 Land Values (payable 2020) $60,000.00 $60,000.00 2019 Building Values (payable 2020)* $225,700.00 $225,700.00 2019 Total Values (payable 2020)* $285,700.00 $285,700.00 2018 Total Values (payable 2019)* $151,500.00 $151,500.00 Property Tax Information Net Tax(payable 2019) Special Assessments(2019) Total Tax&Assessments(2019) $3,759.74 $0.00 $3,759.74 *Manufactured Homes Payable the Same Year as Assessment. Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal,survey. or for zoning verification Parcel data current as of 07/24/2019 Dakota County, MN Page 1 of 1 Property Card Parcel ID Number 14-77000-26-121 Owner Information , s•y # V Fee Owner 4I f ff ' ~,..r 0';� $ +. .1' ' ' � .. , yt� EZ PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC ;, �' «. rtr xy, a, ♦ fl Mailing Address �+ , te tilt 34Z- ' '_ 4 321 ELM ST ° t^', FARMINGTON MN 55024 go ' �C`'f`I� ' Property Address Address 212 4TH ST Municipality m, .r FARMINGTON Parcel Information Last Qualified Sale 10/15/2018 Total Acres 0.16 Sale Value $217,000.00 R/W Acres Uses RESIDENTIAL Water Acres Plat TOWN OF FARMINGTON Lot and Block 12 26 Tax Description LOT FT OF E 1/2 OF LOT 11 BLK 26&N 75 FT OF 2019 Building Characteristics(payable 2020)* Building Type S.FAM.RES Year Built 1953 Bedrooms 3 Building Style ONE STORY Foundation Sq Ft 1,412 Bathrooms 1.50 Frame WOOD Above Grade Sq Ft 1,412 Garage Sq Ft 288 Multiple Buildings Finished Sq Ft 1,412 Other Garage Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve Open Space 192 VERMILLION RIVER NON HOMESTEAD Assessor Valuation Taxable Estimated 2019 Land Values (payable 2020) $36,300.00 $36,300.00 2019 Building Values (payable 2020)* $173,700.00 $173,700.00 2019 Total Values (payable 2020)' $210,000.00 $210,000.00 2018 Total Values (payable 2019)* $172,367.00 $192,300.00 Property Tax Information Net Tax(payable 2019) Special Assessments(2019) Total Tax&Assessments(2019) $2,677.08 $313.32 $2,990.40 *Manufactured Homes Payable the Same Year as Assessment. Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search appraisal, surveyor for zoning verification Parcel data current as of 07/24/2019 Dakota County, MN Page 1 of 1 City of Farmington Map 12.1 Farmington Zoning Map ( ii, J.:-L . h t{� y)- --t---- 1 ((Il��'4' It�I X T,f�..un L t' r n�i. 1r T ` 7 i , . WA ' ' v•.,:',-.•• ....',.'•.•;•:41.. ',,,,‘,..-• , ^ -1 :.:, , 1 '',y • a z< t p '�K y,'k 1 __._..... foii'q x'y -;.. .3.e,:-,' . w tet. t f"t_ w 4:44,..t. iH .d2't1',�i T.Mei jY` tj��yj 1c5i'!'.'/ S t�Lt A°= 4,- �r gg .y l s --tt i{ ��... ik. i:� �. � i(`�' c-,,„,, ;�'4a6 I/J6/�, • -...�it3 :fi • f , r h ., .V.6: ir/ rV! pklt "1-t.:•,7,' , w� 'tf' K 11 eti b� PI ' _ �!/ ,moi a ��yy r. gyp/ ,,,6 F Li i: el Fair/ AAA A– / r�)fr 11'1i� j ' z i9` �1 Siucr i 1 ,,.p t ' ''S1'1 .. ..gy�pp,. j t cir«N i }��yy / '/ I __tit , : L � ,/,/s 111111 1 1 .' M 0 0.25 0.5 1 Milesn - �' 1 `1, Legend Zoning -P/OS(Park/Open Space) A-1(Agriculture) ` I R-1(Low Density Residential-1,0-3.5 du/ac) 1111 B-1(Highway Business) I I R-2(Low/Medium Density Residential-3.5-6.0 du/ac) -B-2(Downtown Business) NillR-3(Medium Density Residential-6.0-12.0 du/ac) -8-3(Heavy Business) -R-5(High Density Residential-12.0+du/ac) N -8-4(Neighborhood Business) 111111 R-D(Downtown Residential) ,n\ 11111Business/Commercial Flex R-T(Downtown Transitional Mixed Use) W+E ®I-1(Industrial) I ROW(Right-of-Way) V -IP(Industrial Park) -SSC(Spruce Street Commercial) S -Mixed-Use I I Water _Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Other Map dated March 5,2013. Vermillion River Floodplain Q Downtown Commercial District Prepared for the City of Farmington Community Development Department + Historic Properties I/I Empire OAA by the Dakota County Office of GIS, ® MIBi3 # W� `n # $ $r� a;osauuiy 'uo8uiwiej 2IIVd321 Ol1V Z3 n; hI P E zN E 6. ‘ 11111' ' ati9x ;11 a a V = Q _� la ap `dJiSnf glil3 aailyy }i>$yi. ^^ j a -----.---) gR l : ®g lq 15a � 133211S 1-1217 cj 4 ilEg .4 III 111.0-.9, 'Ir' w1sx3 00'SL __ .,j 00'S. "+ 3.00,00.06 V 3,00..06 S ffigN Jn LL \ J L- �\ b` \ W pmi A-4A-Al ° ..-..-.K- \ / W ° F I \ Z 1 �CG O oL: 3 • \ � 1\ .cam ti) ^ w, .o -80 m 1 a' v I ° v. i Zip ---- IZ :i Fj a z \ w r--\ • J 4 Q I NL____ qI \ 11 \ 16 W • l\,-.-. 1 --I : \ 1-----\\' . .j , vn WW1.9mx-I ,\\+w \ 1\- •. • 0 f°.1 u —J 3,00,00.06 N 3.00,00.06 N - - W II ,1-1 I:0111pol E. gg u ° 1111# n FE El IIS OV 1.1 w tail1 i m U.Ilkll=11=11? k- -II-11-11k11-1 1111 1:=11k�1=1 li la X11:=�1�IIKII^ Cd ni "s www y .9-F lY-wOImV OLM 1393E.Om90I\O1M DTII .A..1 (Nii 0 0 $ i P P ,. c g Eli E i S a— S§ o e So. I 51FBgo — S 63sg g ,gw ion § U 3 ' 5 8 "0 8 g o o z .85 T °— 9- g `' 1 ig a up a o ® • o 0 S gg ti° t < o O y_ !PJ f Q k _ H O p w gt R ^�$j Q 9999° w w Qua g iyy gr /� 7 geLL 3g x o 9 i rc QQ s ggggEi ° p 5 6 I ^5 d fil{i 'w , - ,) ?o s ,) 2 S W N is: i °g ' 6s r b rc .l 3 § a `3 L i 5 i w m � '6 • 8 y es 6➢ :S Y W w �e� p 2 ! s 3" V. o s i fs V. 11 D0- i ilti # 4 X , J w 53>�m 5° UJ J W U N .a . ° g b S 5 v/j�7 5 2 0-,W C7� OD 0 r 114 mZ n 3 16 N t w o 0 0 > 1 z re 1 � 2 /1 0 p N i .� 8 / O� 3 .ez " 1( 1 -i �i O I r¢-i I . _ I I- W §w> AI ` W 0 6 , 133N1S HIV Z II° ro — r� 1 A� .� W ge -- aak�ma . t-----1 • 3 .'., uu a 3„goAa .e •'i e - -�'u05o n .. P : 0 !�s w :--41-- ,_ iii, -.,..7. 3 f iii .�000 U $oo k' c -L'� X50 il $ �o P 2S N ci - rth q� •_ 2 rn� • c rc o o�f.,p W #h6� u w II .I R til 1- tt f \'(;' \t '1:77.t./. .r��{Jj_ .� 111111.,8 W ! E •,,,,,-- 00.4E :7 h. ,• I 00'46 I.I.iu >r. i l y 3 506 ,00�0X+-' ? d.uuAu.uu n 1 B iw Z ''` 11 x LL • pW m a Y q 8 U O 8 0 101 = 11 t e i 1 z N ii ,_ §')'; °seaqi gr., o ., G� i a d 0, ; V p. G HI of `3 $.B', `i-e,..H, ��� g ps �;aa:< U 0 Z gotl w a -. g 8o m g f 1-15 W z � w w 6 h 3 n g g b � hi Q o FFA i 7 i <7 = g 3 eg dl, LL y j = 6 f o.,z vy e� o hna M WI . ,�3 � �g@__ O g et `gym § 1 0 g 'Z' Y ga a _ p2 $ a p LD z j c a a '§. aE LL CZ_ 6, .. w ' w a 8 V n§ 7 8e H R Z = g y ❑ z $ 8Eoo9 F mF m . 5 F a❑ rt 55 a U Is_m- k e E W Og Z H Q 6 3 to -iil_ E ZU iII �� U CO :,:,,,ii 1,1 1 i a g6if . ae 2 Illi s i‘,/,:ilk �� e z VIII; a oz as$ $ ' ! 2 `> ►��__ 2 -1 1 . z N N iii m a 8c,5mo, m I 3 3 5 S' 1 3 VA I_I. o w l i l i i a NW �IQ . a� S 1T jT 7 ¢N-1a I A I ¢ } * 0 o • i & I1 I I I T1T1 T1T1 i i i N O g 1 9 4 zix I W o n y fn ia 3a $ Q 43 4; ie °@ o� o W < e 13a A w mo : 133111S Hit, Z r il / _ n K 1 • . ., ,,i--1 ,0._ —1 - ' , — . ill i ir it 1.It9 Ei mak' o oc�T/ 'o a _L ( . o z p F ow '� iro` § r tr .. 'g W njn 01 i E ng k J 'l'I Nh .. ,..,,or,-ti k • 1 y Soe 1 } N B 0 A 1 o r 9G i g ? < E z m . R LL —5i".—' m \ .e g 8 ■ 0 3 • y .U-e gaffia i _ n L. — D NU =g A '' N CD g 11 2k 23 11 ii �� i elosauwyy 'uol8wwiej 1E d IIVd321 Olf1V Z3 R, i d t=lzb li -) Xgah 133211S LIW E v U J H N mE— , Q Wi Q• N -may 0 al - � . I I I I I \I \\\t \ • \ �, LEg w o F I \ 2 \ I FCL — \ o I \ CA @e P o I \ N \\ I F. w • rl Ian I \ : "- I ! ( . . _ . . _ . .`-"'''-'. . _ . . ___ . . _i___ . . ___ . . _ . . _ P..1_ . .1-A___ . . _ . . _I - - - 1 i r• iv _ _ p. - „on g - - - i 1:111;1;1 n-,cLmv urn i,,r,oscnv4amni i>nz awa.0 CITY OF 0430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARM I N GTO N © 651-280-6800 OFarmingtonMN.gov ___....„,..... , ---,.. .. TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Variance request from Section 10-6-6(A)of the City Code to allow an accessory structure(shed)to be located closer than 10 feet to an existing structure-520 Main Street DATE: October 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION Dale Lomas has applied for a variance from Section 10-6-6(A)of the City Code to allow an accessory structure(shed)to be located closer than 10 feet to an existing structure. The subject property is located at 520 Main Street. Planning Division Review Applicant: Dale Lomas 520 Main Street Farmington, MN 55024 Property Address: 520 Main Street Attachments: 1. Variance Application 2. Aerial of property 3. Site Plan Existing Zoning: R-D (Downtown Residential) 2030 Comprehensive Plan: Low Medium Density Residential Variance Request: To allow an accessory structure(shed)to be located closer than 10 feet to an existing structure(detached garage)on the subject property. DISCUSSION Dale Lomas is proposing to construct a 10'x 20'shed on his property located at 520 Main Street. Mr. Lomas is proposing to place the shed towards the rear of the property adjacent to an existing detached garage. The shed is proposed to be setback approximately 4 feet from the side lot line and approximately 30 feet from the rear property line adjacent to the alley. The proposed placement of the shed meets the minimum required setbacks from the property lines (min 3 feet from side lot line, and 10 feet from the rear property line/alley). The requested variance is for the setback of the proposed shed from the existing detached garage. Code requires a 10 foot setback from any structure. Mr. Lomas is proposing to have the shed 3 feet from the existing detached garage,thus requiring a variance of 7 feet. If the variance is approved by the Planning Commission the shed could not have any openings on the inside wall adjacent to the existing garage and the shed would have to have a one-hour fire wall separation placed within the shed (resulting in 1/2" minimum sheet rock being placed on the inside walls of the shed). The Planning Commission shall not approve any variance unless they find "practical difficulties" as defined in City Code exist using the following criteria: 1. Because the particular physical surroundings, or shape, configuration,topography, or other conditions of the specified parcel of land involved, strict adherence to the regulations of this title would cause practical difficulties. This particular property is a corner lot therefore removing additional lot area for placement of accessory structures as they must be located in the side or rear of a yard behind the principal structure. 2. That the variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. That the variance would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this title. It is staff's belief that the variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this title. 4. The conditions upon which the variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not applicable,generally,to other properties within the same zoning classification.According to County records, the property was originally developed in 1910. The property is a corner lot and is typically smaller than most corner lots that are platted today. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this title and has not been created by any persons presently having any interest in the parcel of land. The difficulty is caused by the adopted minimum setback provisions of the Zoning Code and was not brought on by actions of the person having interest in the property. 6. The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality or be injurious to other property within the vicinity in which the parcel of land is located or substantially diminish property values. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality or will be injurious to other property within the vicinity. The variance will not substantially diminish surrounding property values. 7. The proposed variance will not substantially increase congestion of the public streets,or increase the danger of fire, or be detrimental to the public welfare or public safety. The variance will not substantially increase the congestion of the public streets,or increase the danger of fire,or be detrimental to the public welfare or public safety. 8. The requested variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the practical difficulties. This is the minimum action necessary to eliminate the practical difficulties. 9. Variances may not be approved for any use that is not allowed under this title for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located except that the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling may be authorized by variance. The subject property is zoned R- D(Downtown Residential). The use of the property as a single-family use is allowed under the R- D zoning guidelines. ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends approval of the 7 foot variance as requested to allow an accessory structure(shed)to be located closer than 10 feet to an existing structure subject to the following conditions: 1. The shed must be constructed with no openings on the interior wall adjacent to the detached garage and all of the inside walls of the proposed shed must be fire rated with a minimum 1/2" sheet rock. 2. That the appropriate city staff be notified for inspection of the property upon completion. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material Variance application D Backup Material Aerial of property D Backup Material Site Plan City of Farmington onSlisc1 ALS 3 0 2019 Farmia;lon.Minneyda '�* 651.280.6800•Fax 651250.6899 www VARIANCE APPLICATION Applicant: A"!it L o pp/JS Telephone:(a) 8 '- J "7 Fax: ( ) Address: s---?P /2 ire/f fq/en�4A/1 ✓J?/1 .5.t`P? Street City State Zip Code Owner: i D,1t, J.,ilX // Telephone: g yt`i r-�it Fax: ( ) j�} C/ Address: tut / ���� ,�/fI i'' Pito. ►�/j A v Z I Street City , State Zip Code Premises Involved: S-1.0S-1.0 31 Se L r Q f i -714 r l ti pilin 14.l 9 Address/Legal Description(lot,black,plat name,section,township,range) Current Zoning District Current Land Use JF'sa t/I 4)t i 0 f Specific Nature of Request/Claimed Practical Difficulties: !i i?1* VM/o"!At:L -lb i5 _rue/ 3' -Wpm ex'...1 4i07 ?n lk_ SUBMITTAL RFjOUIRE ENTS D Proof of Ownership 0 Copies of Site Plan D Application Fee(5269)'lb D Abstract/Residential List(adjoining property owners only) D Boundary/Lot Survey D Torrens(Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title Required) tilt (PflK/ W7P/?ill j O t 3P��I� Signature of PropertyOwner Date o Applicant Date gns Signa Request Submitted to the Planning Commission on For office use only Public Hearing Set for: Advertised in Local Newspaper: Planning Commission Action: Approved Denied Fee Paid $250—City of Farmington Comments: Conditions Set: Planning division Date: 1/1/2018 DRAFTEDBY: City ofFa tm 430 thhd Shea Farmington,TM 55024 Dakota County, MN /Oki, t.,, . ; ,.7,::,,,N , , y ' . -11,'''',w, ",,,,,41;tf 4,,, ... ,, d R . + ° .' � i + P' t t ,,_...tio....,.„ „,... ' ':4,.,,,,,,,,,,,iiii ,. 41 r, .7, , sr;ii f, ,, ,,r,1 ,r , 4 'If P xr _ t i � "� ,, " t° rr e 4 #. z rt .�. , rtd". , ;., .., , :- , - =., rx _ _.,,,.. ,"..,),„-,..,,,,:.:4,,,,—, i q .,1, ii October 2, 2019 1:600 0 25 50 100 ft I , , 0 5 10 20 m Property Information Disclaimer:Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate,but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal,survey,or for zoning verification. 51 Wc11 k-, 5 ao 41,1 Navl�� • Oafry ria- hf4 y r n lv4krny A II y CITY OF 0430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARM I N GTO N © 651-280-680o FarmingtonMN.gov TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Application for an amendment to a previously approved conditional use permit to expand the commercial recreational use in an existing building and to allow for a 24- hour access gym component-21210 Eaton Avenue DATE: October 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION Crossfit Calypso, LLC has submitted a conditional use permit application in order to expand their business within the existing building located at 21210 Eaton Avenue. Planning Division Review Applicant: Crossfit Calypso 21210 Eaton Avenue Farmington, MN 55024 Property Owner: Bob Delich 12850 Dory Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 Property Location: 21210 Eaton Avenue-Suites B, C and D Current Land Use: Multi-tenant building. Surrounding Land Uses: Commercial/Industrial properties are adjacent to the north and west. A residential property and the Northern Natural Gas complex is adjacent to the east. CSAH 50 is adjacent to the south. Existing Zoning: I P (Industrial Park) Comprehensive Plan: Industrial Attachments: 1. CUP application 2. Aerial of property 3. Building floor plan DISCUSSION Crossfit Calypso was granted a conditional use permit on October 29, 2013 in order to establish a commercial recreation use within the I P (Industrial Park) zoning district. Crossfit Calypso has been described as a class based fitness facility that focuses on functional movements. The programs combines weight lifting,gymnastics, conditioning, plyometrix and bodyweight movements. The applicant is looking to expand the use and occupy suites B, C, D of the existing building they are located in at 21210 Eaton Avenue. The applicant has indicated that suite B would be converted into a 24-hour access gym. Setbacks and lot coverage are not an issue with the application as the use is proposed to occupy space within an existing building. Parking for both the proprietors and clients of the business will be accommodated by the existing parking found on the property both on the north and south side of the building. There are currently 41 off-street parking stalls on the subject property,this should be adequate to meet the parking needs of the uses in the building. Conditional Use Permit The city code provides criteria that must be satisfied for the Planning Commission to grant a conditional use permit. Those criteria are: 1. The proposed use conforms to the district permitted and conditional use provisions and all general regulations of this title. The proposed use is a conditional use within the IP zoning district and conforms to all general regulations of this title. 2. The proposed use shall not involve any element or cause any conditions that may be dangerous, injurious or noxious to any other property or person and shall comply with the performance standards listed below. The proposed use will not involve any element or cause any conditions that maybe dangerous,injurious or noxious to any other property or person and it complies with all performance standards. 3. The proposed use shall be constructed, designed, sited, oriented and landscaped to produce a harmonious relationship of buildings and grounds to adjacent buildings and properties. The use will be established within an existing building. 4. The proposed use shall produce a total visual impression and environment which is consistent with the environment of the neighborhood. The use will be contained to the inside of an existing building. 5. The proposed use shall organize vehicular access and parking to minimize traffic congestion in the neighborhood. The proposed use will not significantly increase traffic in the surrounding neighborhood. 6. The proposed use shall preserve the objectives of this title and shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the Conditional Use Permit allowing the expansion of a Commercial Recreation use and the addition of a 24-hour access gym within the I P zoning district at the property addressed as 21210 Eaton Avenue,subject to the following conditions: 1. A sign permit be applied for and approved for any exterior signage to be placed on the premises. 2. The applicant shall obtain all necessary building permits from the City's Building Official. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material CUP application D Backup Material Aerial of property D Backup Material Building floor plan d.':i.•t:•, CO of I'Arttingtnn SEP 0 3 2013 4 �cx x. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT:APPLIC:ATIO.N r Applicant: OQd7SSF VS CALIFS C. elc.phone:411 /245"I IS( Fat; I_i _ ____. Address: 11110 6P'iuNJ prae Fa .s)0.a win) 5.501.1 C t, State Zip f.-odeStnt .1Owner / .4/'/ z 6.. e; n F' / :1Ldl l'.\i �. . 6= •,J J (_._,..(_ ) C_•, .J.L.�._/14,.( 5'7C-1 1 )-p Strca t City V / / (`.....�L. - ...vp Z p Code Premises Involved: 4 /;110 1.----.':.1 4.7.),,-, /"1-i..-L_. ..S 4-7. i•J1 �._4..:'/" t) Addrcss:'I.eea,Ih:v.ription tlot.'stiuck.plat(wine.section.township.range) Cunene Zoning District (::arrear t.amd 1.:se CCTnrntr(C+9t fteite<JVAA � f1IL _ Specific Nature of Request: Gf , L Oto CPr 'k S'.t,'1eL7rs. OCCAV. c 3,,fl • __21Zj._Fi,,,,bA1 +t11/G 5utk 0 wo.,,la 114 Co+tode k IA, a 2y- L{fAA. aCce$ ,SL;BMMF11AL.REQ 13IREM E I'S Proof ntOwnership (.Copies of Site Plan .:Application Fee '.:.Rbaract'2esidentiai I.:.t irequircd iitr howl aubject property) :13odory;( irMis • 'l?,rrcn:fOwner's I)upii�ateCertificate o Tit•Required) C"'`: J Signature 91Utvaer Date Signature er1Appticant pate • Request Submitted to Planning stall on .. For office use only • Public Hearin_Set fur: . .. Adticrttsed to Lural Vot+Sparer. . Planning Crunntis.iin Action: ApprovedDrn.icd rev.Paid City Council Action(if ncv_t: sarti•): . _Approved Denied 5200 . City of Farmington S44. Dakota County Reconler Continents: Conditions Set: Planning division: Date: 9•'06 MA}I a,re: .1.4!:NM.t,.k• - . . - -- . . .. :„. . 14 ; - ,,, f"' ,r,- ,:',4;c"...:f.,e. : `..,,- 1 • -' • , ,,,,,..... .,.,.. .........-' , a '''''' --- '' ''.,t'Xtccr.1"-- !. it. ... I .': : !. '''.."-'47.1T-trit:-., '' . 'L. , .., .__ ._ , _ .r. k r .. . . f.. ., i. .: ko, , • [ ki! ---4Eti'..t'r4;-:-,':','=.i.., i_.,.._rrrfrr,r,.?,-,-,''''',-.4iii;.,',• 131 .! 6.i4 A'it : 1 - (01'i;4:-...' l' Eli: 1: • .. I 7.4; r;,,7, -.„-,.. ewe or .....' - 1 - _ 4,.. ' . -IR :isr"I .t. ... ,. i",,,,41. e ,,11,,,, - :,... ,..„......: _ i: m , _ §- : ,.., ..t..„:„J , ,, i . , . .,.-. :tiw , A .,.. „ • I aw '.. *110 A 1 • .. —. .:".,-,:).-4'-'0,,ri'.- ;„;..;"--': , r--, ,. :1..,-:. t 4)', I; # ,...:114 ..... .-----;,,-...4 ,' 4;stlaTEat--' ' 111 i 11 1 . ,. .. , ... .., , . 1,,,'jr,'f 1 4.::•'-' 0", .,i',. I 1 ,6f,,,, 1'Mtir'lh'i :-..!.f,...t...4-44 ,., ,., .. :; .... , t.',.4:,. .°42'.;.•,':' A. --'- ,, ... _..._.......,___ ., ,. :_) 1,411z, - -----•\„'„7::.„,..''4,''-.,...t.----.:,:i.,;.....--......._.. .. ..._ ...., ....,......, .,,,... c0 ,-I o (NI iii (NI Zi 0 r— I 1 , 1 I 1 F" J ° 'a � o ri' LI 11 oz �oQwla b o 8 A ii , _, _ ..:,_ , 74--, (-- 0 < 7 X10 < ®1 t l H r ` Q z � m ° o > ,z 18 I � } � NY m ln o.Q. 1___ F__ c/ � o m 0_ Fo w I "; z t ° N) I ww — tY ° o .< o moi ® N ,� T z E I'S LL tU of T- ., I LU r=w N � � � p rp I cQ r'- w s � Z? � pa p rnso , › -z 6 _o O w '�a kD 6 0 �,(Ni 6 `" d- I 0� II 101 —0 � r HCl� � m �0 so 6s rD r dm u_ zz __ n f i , , __ �V --, 1708_2121'0 Eaton.dw� I cr � J � = o LU � I z 3 g moo -I pI i_ N - p 5 o0 Ey Q ° w o v _.... I a.1 • rY CV C m i m Q F „0-08 Q .0-,017 OOv > c� m .� Z 1 r 1 L 1 l 1 1 I 1 [� CCC Q. I - 1 '1 L 4 O 4O'-O° }- m Lu Lu I � N U-1 Q _i OOe-) O .< ;, vi NU- ----9 t n N ' I 1 O w 4WRQ n g i �j Zom �} m ZZ z v 00 § � CQ 111 -z- - zw07. o �— 0 0 -__l = N v i , , , 0 � NIL 'ii-' N U El ��,j E `� 0 aI' iI/2" �t� — Q6 � rn :.. _ 0 � � - ® a- u' m 6 ) i ' 5 T 0 E ›- O iXQN� 0 uQ �p•(Y i 6 p sU1 Ni-iLr) .9 i I _c 6.0 CD J p 4f) \/ v V �� ' -,-6D, _(-63 N N D , Z L 5� � QcQp � � I O D W 1 i . AJ J o kJ At-A-'5 - 1708_2121] Eaton.dwq cl ( En C- . I:- p2'-8 I/2" ' j {§CI2_O UocW 45'-3" >� A I o 1 ,PRINKL.ER - RISER L. Z CITY OF 0430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARM I N GTO N © 651'280-68o0 �IIIIII O FarmingtonMN.gov TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Second amendment to a planned unit development site plan for the Trinity Campus- 905 Elm Street DATE: October 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION Attached,for the Commission's review and recommendation is an ordinance for a second Planned Unit Development(PUD)site plan amendment for the Trinity Care Center campus generally located east of Trunk Highway 3, south of 213th Street W and addressed as 905 Elm Street. DISCUSSION Farmington Health Services dba Trinity Care Center is requesting a second amendment to the Planned Unit Development site plan for their property located at 905 Elm Street. The original PUD site plan was approved by the City Council on November 19, 2012 and contained the following proposed site changes: • Construction of an additional ten (10) bed group home for memory care residents, identical to the one that previously opened in 2012. • The demolition of the remaining hospital building and construction of a utilities addition to the existing skilled nursing center • The construction of two(2) senior living apartment buildings on the west side of the property. The 2016 PUD site plan amendment made several changes to the original plan, including: • Removing the two(2)senior living apartment buildings from the plan • Adds a twenty nine(29) unit nursing home addition near the north end of the site. This has been constructed and a temporary certificate of occupancy has been issued. • Provides for a reduced front yard setback for the nursing home addition. The setback is reduced from twenty five(25)feet to eighteen and one-half 18 1/2')feet. • Adds a 5,977 square foot addition onto the north side of the existing nursing home for office, storage and delivery space. This space has been constructed. • The overall parking for the site would be reduced with the amendment to 105 off-street parking stalls. The original approved plan called for 130 off-street parking stalls. This is a reduction of 25 spaces. • Shows a north/south access road that connects from 213th Street W south to the entry drive off of Elm Street. This also shows cross access to the Pellicci hardware site both at the north and south end of the Pellicci site. The second amendment to the PUD site plan that is currently being requested is attached and includes the following revisions: • The removal of the north/south access road. It has been determined that this access is not needed for fire protection reasons. • Cross access to the Pellicci site(3560 213th Street W) is maintained with the proposed amended PUD site plan with an access drive that will extend from the southern boundary of the Pellicci site southeast to the Trinity entry drive. Additionally, cross access will be provided on the north end of the Trinity site off of 213th Street to the parking lot on the north end of the Pellicci site.The applicant will need provide the necessary easement for cross access at the two locations identified on the amended PUD site plan and ensure those areas are available for construction of those accesses by the adjacent property owner. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission should recommend approval of the attached ordinance approving the second amendment to the Planned Unit Development site plan for Trinity Care Center contingent upon the following and forward that recommendation on to the City Council: 1. The applicant furnishing a signed easement agreement for the two cross accesses shown on the amended site plan. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material Second PUD amendment site plan D Backup Material 2016 PUD amendment site plan D Ordinance PUD amendment ordinance CITY OF--- © 430 Third St..Farmington.MN 55024 FARMINGTON © 651-280-6800 /��� k O FarmingtonMN.gov PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Applicant:Farmington Health Services dba Trinity Care Center Telephone:651.463.7818 Fax:651.460.2009 Address: 905 Elm Street; Farmington MN 55024 Street City State Zip Code Owner: St.Francis Health Services of Morris,Inc.Telephone: 320.589.2004 Fax: 320.589.1270 Mailing Address: 801 Nevada Avenue Morris MN 56267 Street City State Zip Code Premises Involved: Trinity Health Care 1st Addition;Lotl,Block 1,SOUTH SUBURBAN FIRST ADDITION,according to the recorded plat thereof,Dakota County,Minnesota.and The north 180 feet of the South Half of the North Two Thirds of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32,Township 114 Range 19,Dakota County,Minnesota,EXCEPT The south 60 feet of the west 200 feet thereof. and That part of vacated Elm Street described as follows:Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 1,Block 1, South Suburban First Addition;thence North on the west line of said lot 25.00 feet thence South 73 degrees 37 minutes 20 seconds east 88.49 feet to eh South line of said lot;thence West 85 feet along the south line of said lot to the Southwest corner of Lot 1,Block 1 and there terminating. Address/Legal Description(lot,block,plat name, section,township,range) Fee: $300 X Paid Current Zoning District R5 Names&Addresses of All Owners: See above; sole owner. SUBMITTAL REOUIREMENTS—SEE ATTA r D FORM"A" r� Xter Oe//9' Signature of Applicant Date Schematic Plan For office use only 1. Planning Commission Action Recommended Approval Recommended Denial 2. City Council Action Approved Denied Preliminary PUD Plan 1. Public Hearing Set for: Advertised in Local Newspaper 2. Planning Commission Action Recommended Approval Recommended Denial 3. City Council Action Approved Denied Final PUD Plan 1.City Council Action Approved Denied Comments: Conditions Set: Planning division: Date: 9/19 EASEMENT The parties to this Agreement are Farmington Health Services, a Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation,("Grantor")and Farmington Stallions,LLC,a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, ("Grantee"). WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of certain real estate in Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows (Parcel A): Parcel 1: That part of Lot One(1),Block(1),TRINITY HEALTH CARE 1ST ADDITION,according to the recorded plat thereof,which lies north of the north line of the South One-Half(S1/2)of the North Two-Thirds (N2/3) of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Section 32,T.114N, R.19W, in Dakota County, Minnesota. Together with an Easement Agreement recorded as Doc.No. 258906; Together with an Easement for sewer line and utility easements over and across the South 50 feet of the West 190 feet of the North One-third of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 32, Township 114, Range 19 as recorded in Doc.No. 299418. (Torrens Property) Parcel 2: That part of Lot One(1), Block(1), TRINITY HEALTH CARE 1ST ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota EXCEPTING THEREFROM That part of Lot One (1), Block (1), TRINITY HEALTH CARE 1ST ADDITION,according to the recorded plat thereof,which lies north of the north line of the South One-Half(S 1/2)of the North Two-Thirds(N2/3)of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter(SW 1/4-NW 1/4)of the Section Thirty-two (32),Township One Hundred Fourteen(114)North, Range Nineteen(19)West,in Dakota 1 County, Minnesota; Together with an easement for vehicle ingress and egress pursuant to Easement Agreement Document Nos. T258915,T258906, and T250410 over and across the following described property: That part of the North One Third of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter(N1/3-SW1/4-NW1/4)of Section Thirty-two(32),Township One Hundred Fourteen (114)North, Range Nineteen(19)West, Dakota County,Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW1/4-NW1/4);thence South 00 degrees 14 minutes 12 seconds West(assumed bearing) along the west line thereof 301.12 feet to the north line of the South 140.00 feet of said North One Third of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter(N1/3-SW1/4-NW1/4);thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds East along said north line 190.01 feet to the east line of the West 190.00 feet of the said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW1/4- NW1/4); thence South 00 degrees 14 minutes 12 seconds West along said east line of the West 190.00 feet 21.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds East 145.28 feet;thence North 00 degrees 13 minutes 05 seconds East and its northerly extension 322.04 feet to the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter(SW1/4-NW1/4); thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 51 seconds West along said north line 335.19 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that part taken for State Trunk Highway No.3(formerly State Trunk Highway No. 218); AND ALSO EXCEPT that part taken for County Road No. 72 (formerly township road). (Abstract Property) WHEREAS, Grantee is the owner of certain real estate in Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows (Parcel B): That part of the N 1/3 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 32,Township 114,Range 119, Dakota County,Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4; thence South 0 degrees 14 minutes 12 seconds West (assumed bearing)along the west line thereof 301.12 feet to the north line of the South 140.00 feet of said North 1/3 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4;thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds East along said north line 190.01 feet to the east line of the West 190.00 feet of said SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4; thence South 0 degrees 14 minutes 12 seconds West along said east line of the West 190.00 feet 21.00 feet;thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds East 145.28 feet;thence North 0 degrees 13 minutes 05 seconds East and its northerly extension 322.04 feet to the north line of said SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4;thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 51 seconds West along said north line 335.19 feet to the point of beginning.EXCEPT that part taken for State Trunk Highway No. 3 (formerly State Trunk Highway No. 218) and also Except that part taken for County Road No. 72 (formerly township road). 2 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee, their successors, heirs and assigns, a perpetual easement for passenger vehicle access,over and across Parcel A,as described above, for access to Parcel B, as described above along the route described as follows: Northerly Easement: A 30.86' wide northerly access across the northwest portion of Parcel A from 213th Street West to the existing bituminous on Parcel B as shown on Exhibits A and B. Said Northerly Easement is identified as such on Exhibit B. AND Southerly Easement: A 24.00' wide access across the southwest portion of Parcel A connecting with the existing bituminous on Parcel B,said easement route to run from the westerly-most access to Parcel A off of Elm Street in a northwesterly direction. Said Southerly Easement is identified as such on Exhibit B. AND Such use of Grantor's road access off of Elm Street as is necessary to access the Southerly Easement. 2. Grantee shall have the right to remove trees, vegetation, and growth, and any other obstructions as may be reasonably necessary with the rights of access,or ingress and egress, across said easement. 3. Grantee shall maintain a"No Delivery Trucks"sign on the Southerly Easement. 4. Grantee shall maintain a "stop" sign at the southerly portion of the Southerly Easement before entering the roadway on Parcel A. 5. Grantee shall be responsible for all costs of construction and maintenance of said easement routes as well as the cost of drafting and recording this easement. Said 3 routes will be constructed per the drawings on Exhibits A and B. The easement route will be constructed using the same blacktop specifications used on the roadway it connects with on Parcel A. 6. Grantee shall,at all times and at its sole expense,maintain the easement routes such that they are-well maintained for their purpose. 7. It is the intent of the parties that the Easement set forth in this instrument shall be a perpetual covenant running with the land and as such, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit and burden of the respective parties as well as their heirs, representatives and assigns, and as such,may be enforced by either of the parties or by their heirs, representatives and assigns in a Court of competent jurisdiction and whether at law or at equity, as appropriate. Dated this day of , 2019. GRANTOR: GRANTEE: FARMINGTON HEALTH SERVICES, FARMINGTON STALLIONS, LLC, By By Its Its 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF STEVENS ) On this day of , 2019, before me, a notary public within and for said County,personally appeared , to me personally known,who,being by me duly affirmed did say that he/she is the of Farmington Health Services and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors,and the said ,acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation, Grantor. Signature of Notary Public or Other Official My Commission expires: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of ,2019,before me,a notary public within and for said County,personally appeared ,to me personally known,who,being by me duly affirmed did say that he/she is the of , and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and the said ,acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation, Grantee. Signature of Notary Public or Other Official My Commission expires: Drafted by: Fluegel,Anderson,McLaughlin &Brutlag, Chartered Attorneys at Law 215 Atlantic Avenue,PO Box 527,Morris,MN 56267-0527;(320)589-4151 25 Second Street NW,Suite 102,Ortonville,MN 56278;(320)839-2549 1112 First Avenue North,Professional Building,Wheaton,MN 56296,Phone:(320)563-1414 5 antoutNf m,ammo♦t"YIN-ta -•q+Iatroae --w+e .... N019NIFY2tl1 J0 db N'"^ 831.N30 321V0 Aiimat 'o .'7f.1=„+v..,....s...... +sr.rw• rdew•Mmo •wP.MwPwlM"""° Pwwao�•o.w .,.,r MdP....ww NYd A.1.111111 ' 102:11N00LY 8'?PfN PonsI N0150213 '3DVNKI0 '9NIOV210 .411 X11 g g .•s� gigIgil il III.• ; ; u :1111111 z_.- S 11.4 •. l }ooaip¢ Ill , ofIlIli ; • I ' F 1 i A 4. 1 ,$ rI ..,., „:... . �. I' •i ?_F, kt L.!c/5 `° 1-'11 . . • ,,., , •,,,. ., ., ,,--i•—•, — '{ 1-,�Fl, • C.— . .(I( i i•. f I I Irl I•I_ 5,,ir�� r =�5 r II J \ i ,,r i 1 of .,,4 ,,), Fit4a . 1I $ . 1 1 I !" 311 F --- ! F• • 1 i • • p � I y -i a � e a '1 ?,,...i..1,,,,i____.„, .. Jr; .,,,_....y____..!Its.,_. Ili! ; - St i M(7 , 1üj ? I' I 1ii..f ,.•ii..7 ip 1 • - - 'i- .•!,• ,-.0, ,.1 F .,iN V � 1 1 ';' I I..,-;.,,,,,,; i 0.. 411[4., a ... • .. . . . ,_.-- , . • 1,,,,,,itlilit, , . ..,. :, at, , .,-- , ,, i. i ,.... .-„,-•,4, m. . 11,71-.,.; F.1, I I- 1 , • ,..._, ,o.ii ,. ...„ ...,,••-• .•,, 41 i 1',..0:1...„,, y' i� ---''',..,1''' ,r1L;r• % ' >ri �.n ,�<as i; 1�1 ! FIiFI ,,).,:.:111:),) Jif/ :, •Ally ` a 1 Agr31 1W ',k Fi j + i (4 1• r, w�1�'1ki. ii 4' 1 4CPy ,,,:i!:41.,'',.,1,‘.::,':.:7 r T t { `, ,/ , , I. Sr: rC :r. 6 1 '',.›.-<-47t '..r i „. /(/ ��1• f4 Y ` �gII f 14 m. i - fii.r • 4?a 1 NI ate` t die ;? Fla;l 1i.,;-;11,%'; a lf� I / �.r1,1I c .4 II i t �R g� pl f. �fu` 1 q :f '' �y '. 'I`I 10)pbY {'i )%' i IH • €! / , i r 5. f' i ! i'' 1 Ii "i i Ali ., •I I` �y( s 4`1 1 d. 1. �F,-,11 (----;:, te -'. --.:://:::‘,'.oft 1 f j F F, ,j 1_ f� �y.�Giy J.,...- 'I F ''°'° ,- M oi`1 0 / ` 'a' t v\ 7 E{ : h ‘-.4....:-.• t. e • ; / I .3 `� '',Y-i-'i •a —1-- ,. i ' I 8 I / CX4 immi . •mt( pr: •••• ..= 0.1 W I11 N4 1 l a j I i ; i •g•Q.E ".;`,,w, AT I • I i 1 I i 1 ' '• \ I i i i ..4-•:-. -1..-. :: . • ± :., „, ii 1 1:11 I . 1 I j ili.I r- ..:!-- •14.--i:--:,111 W I -‘ k I I I ' I i I I I 1 ! 1 r , f l •., i i . , „i Li I I I ' 1 ' ' .--L' ri) .- -‘4 1 • ! : — A I I A II i ,÷•- . ,. . 1M I 1 ."- F ' ' •. ' • . ' - ilk • _._•.‘ , - irr- • ..• 1.1 i '. /. , `, / , I \ 1 e ril, •I': J1,. . '• -1 , 1 I y ,:, \••••,... .," , ' 1.1i •, --,., 1.f,1 i . .1 I I,' , ' r 1 '." - --- ) ' •.(:;'I 44_1 1—. — • ,,,,--. ,,, , /..,i '3- •* , ouirsixi H ' - ---- ....iii..-.7.° .== 0 X- :?'4'',5-'/-",-_-•'" , t. I ••""r,..1 ' 7., _......i,/,.;__. ..-.,, ,,,...,,---.., i //,/,.: /;.., / • I)t • ... '..t ,• . :I A::.",;:• '!' -- (11'; 1 - --',-• .. ' :-. --71: . // ' I. -1: • 1-1-----...-' `. '1Y.. / /// , '/ _ , */ '/ I/ /1 1 . / / i / ..a' (1) E 0 2 w 1.1 0 ..0 0 Z a) E a) m as W 74 0 ..= 4., o cn • V)1 AI NMYN -aw OSKi.-IOLI110S091 t9I0N 7S 3N 8A3401 arnwaaw wu aM u�lu Baru www®�nooa�yi�b Taa?ry �a vlo Mlag Id 901091-oMaluuww °i". oiaivs 1ar'Na'JMavare rm'aaaow 9 0 1 0 9 1 ...road awo 01604. NOISaC1 i�31011` del ,141115 3115 S3OIh213S Hl1V3H ' 91-0e-90 ILra I„OaV3a o,,,,,,o"LLZ,,,„,,, �� 2131N3Z 321VZ AlINRII SIDNV2H '1S Q e . 1 IIn . I 2 i g I i 17----"\ ,.....,_. W _ v I WI( a.k..*, FT ri i;--&' _ 8 — . � I I i LID . I •ii Ater\ IIIIUI ti ; , OP,1411d .m i \ '' s �y b.• b N I • `1` Ei E i \ oy I n I W i R ,,,,\Ii. I I I I 1i CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance Approving the Second Amendment to the St. Francis Health Services of Morris,Inc. Planned Unit Development(PUD) Site Plan THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Schematic Site Plan for the St. Francis Health Services of Morris, Inc. Planned Unit Development (PUD) on the 19th day of November, 2012 and the 12.94 acres known as the St. Francis Trinity Campus and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, TRINITY HEALTH CARE 1ST ADDITION and rezoned the property to R-5 PUD; and WHEREAS, the original plan, as approved, included the construction of an additional ten (10) bed group home for Memory Care residents, the demolition of the remaining hospital, construction of a utilities addition to the existing skilled nursing care center, and the construction of two (2) senior living apartments on the west side of the property. WHEREAS, an amendment to the original plan was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2016 and included the following revisions: removing the two senior living apartments and replacing them with an additional twenty nine (29) unit nursing home addition and additional office, storage and delivery space, the proposed nursing home addition is shown on the amended plans as having a reduced front setback of eighteen and one-half(18 '/z') feet, the parking for the site was changed to a total of 105 off-street parking stalls shown on the proposed plan, provided for a north/south access road that connects from 213th Street W south to the entry drive off of Elm Street as well as cross access to the adjacent commercial site (3560 213th Street W) both at the north and south end of the adjacent commercial site. WHEREAS, The second amendment to the PUD site plan includes the following revisions: the removal of the north/south access road, cross access to the adjacent commercial site (3560 213th Street W) is maintained with the proposed amended PUD site plan with an access drive that will extend from the southern boundary of the adjacent commercial site southeast to the Trinity entry drive. Additionally, cross access will be provided on the north end of the Trinity site off of 213th Street to the parking lot on the north end of the adjacent commercial site. The applicant will provide the necessary easement for cross access at the two locations identified on the amended PUD site plan and ensure those areas are available for construction of those accesses by the adjacent property owner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the City of Farmington hereby approves these amendments to the St. Francis Health Services of Morris, Inc. Final PUD Plan contingent upon the following: 1. The applicant furnishing a signed easement agreement for the two cross accesses shown on the amended site plan. Enacted and ordained the day of , 2019. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Todd Larson,Mayor ATTEST: By: David McKnight, City Administrator SEAL Approved as to form the day of , 2019. By: City Attorney CITY OF 0430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARM I N GTO N © 651-280-6800 FarmingtonMN.gov TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Application for an amendment to a previoulsy approved conditional use permit to extend the approved timeframe for completion of improvements-21040 Chippendale Avenue DATE: October 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit[CUP] on November 13, 2018 to allow an auto sales use within the B-1 zoning district at the property located at 21040 Chippendale Avenue. The applicant of that Conditional Use Permit, Nikolay Afanasyev, has applied for an amendment to the approved CUP. DISCUSSION As part of the approval of the 2018 CUP five conditions were established. Those conditions are: 1. The applicant securing all necessary building permits. 2. A sign permit must be applied for and approved for any external signage that may be placed on site. 3. All off-street parking areas must be surfaced with concrete or bituminous in accordance with Section 10-6-4(B) of the City Code. The surfacing must be completed within one year of approval of the CUP or November 13, 2019. 4. The applicant and/or property owner petition and receive the necessary approvals for annexation of the subject property into the city within one year of approval of the CUP or November 13, 2019. 5. Upon annexation,the site must be connected to city water and any wells on site must be abandoned. It should be noted that the applicant has petitioned for annexation of the subject property and the city is working with Empire Township to work through that process. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the 2018 approved CUP to extend the timeframe for completion of the water connection and pavement of the parking lot. The applicant is requesting the extension to November 2020 as the building required more maintenance and set up than originally planned and the costs for that maintenance and set up exceeded what was anticipated. ACTION REQUESTED Consider the request for a CUP amendment extending the timeframe for completion of connecting to city water, abandoning any wells on site, and the pavement of parking areas. The Planning Commission may choose any of the following actions: 1. Not approve the CUP amendment and require the improvements to be met by November 13, 2019. 2. Approve an amendment to the CUP and extend the timeframe for completion of improvements to no later than November 1, 2020 as requested by the applicant. 3. Approve an amendment to the CUP and extend the timeframe for completion of improvements to a date other than the date requested by the applicant. Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the amendment to the CUP and extend the timeframe for completion of those improvements to no later than July 31, 2020. CITY OF O 430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARM I N GTO N © 651-280-6800 OFarmingtonMN.gov TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager SUBJECT: O NG Auto, LLC-315 Pine Street Possible CUP Revocation-Continued DATE: October 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION At the June 11, 2019 Planning Commission meeting staff was directed to set a public hearing for the possible revocation of a Conditional Use Permit for the property located at 315 Pine Street The public hearing was set for July 9, 2019 with notice both published in the local paper and mailed notice to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. The Planning Commission opened the public hearing on July 9th and accepted a motion to continue the public hearing to the October 8th regular meeting in an attempt to provide Mr.Vdovchenko with additional time to come into compliance. DISCUSSION Review On June 13, 2017,the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit[CUP] for the property located at 315 Pine Street to allow an Auto Repair, Major use on the subject property. The applicant was Oleg Vdovchenko of ONG Auto, LLC. Attached,for your review is the staff memorandum from the June 13, 2017 meeting. Three conditions were assigned to the Conditional Use Permit approval,those conditions are: 1. The applicant obtains all necessary building permits from the city's Building Official. 2. A sign permit is applied for any external signage. 3. The proposed parking area must be surfaced with concrete or bituminous and shall be setback at least ten feet from all property lines. Over the last several months the city has received numerous complaints regarding the overall condition that the property is being kept, including vehicles being parked and stored off of the hard surface,vehicles being kept in the city's boulevard (area between the curb of the roadway and the front property line), and Pine Street being used as a staging area for loading and off loading of vehicles for the business. Additionally,the required fencing that was shown and approved as part of the site plan for the CUP has yet to be fully installed. Privacy fencing has been installed on the east side of the property. Many of the issues still remain on the property with the exception of the installation of privacy fencing on the east side of the property. The applicant had indicated that he was going to develop and provide to the City a new plan for the site to address these issues,yet staff has yet to see the updated plan. I n addition it should be noted that the Police Department have had numerous calls at this property for various vandalism issues. ACTION REQUESTED Make a motion to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for 315 Pine Street and direct staff to work with the City Attorney on drafting Findings of Fact that will be brought back to the Planning Commission on November 12, 2019 for review and approval. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material June 13, 2017 Staff memorandum o�FAR �„ City of Farmington dh �, 430 Third Street Farmington,Minnesota 651.280.6800 -Fax 651.280.6899 41 pRoo+�' www.cifarmington.mn.us TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tony Wippler,Planning Manager SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Application to allow an Auto Repair,Major Use within the B- 3 Zoning District DATE: June 13,2017 INTRODUCTION Oleg Vdovchenko, 17477 Gettysburg Way,Lakeville,MN,has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow an Auto Repair,Major Use within the B-3(Heavy Business)zoning district. PLANNING DIVISION REVIEW Applicant/Contract Purchaser of Property: Oleg Vdovchenko- 17477 Gettysburg Way,Lakeville,MN 55044 Property Owner: Bill Sauber-20322 Akin Ct.,Farmington,MN 55024 Property Location: 315 Pine Street Existing Zoning: B-3(Heavy Business) 2030 Comprehensive Plan: Commercial Existing/Previous Land Use: Performance Plumbing and Heating Existing Building and Lot Size: The property consists of two lots totaling 40,958 square feet(0.94 acres). There is an existing 5,800 square foot building that will be utilized on the property. Surrounding Land Uses:A mixture of commercial and industrial as well as a single-family residence is adjacent to the east. a vacant lot is adjacent to the west. A commercial business and a single-family residence to located to the south. The Vermillion River is to the north of the subject property. Proposed Land Use: Major Auto Repair and Automobile Sales DISCUSSION The applicant, Oleg Vdovchenko,has submitted a Conditional Use Permit application in order to allow major auto repair to take place on the property located at 315 Pine Street. Mr. Vdovchenko is proposing to open a business that would consist of repairing motor vehicles including the repair,rebuilding and reconditioning of engines,body work,framework,welding and major painting. Mr.Vdovchenko would also be selling vehicles from the premises. Automobile sales is a permitted use within the B-3 zoning district. The applicant will be utilizing the existing building on site and modifying it to meet his business needs,this will include the addition of two overhead doors on the west side of the building. If the Conditional Use Permit is approved,the applicant will need to contact the City's Building Official to determine what building upgrades, if any,would be necessary for the proposed use. The applicant is proposing to create a parking area for his vehicles on the west and northern sides of the property(see attached site plan). The applicant is showing the parking area as gravel. Section 10-6-4(B)of the City Code requires any off street parking lot and driveway be surfaced with concrete or bituminous material. Additionally,code requires a minimum nonpaved area of at least ten feet in width between the edge of the parking area/lot and the property line. The site plan shows a setback of five feet for the parking area to the property line. The site plan also shows at least four parking spaces in the right-of-way of Pine Street. All parking areas must be keep on the applicant's property and outside of the city's right-of-way. As shown on the attached site plan,the applicant is proposing the construction of two accessory shop buildings towards the northern portion of the site. The applicant is not proposing to construct these buildings immediately. Accessory structures on commercial property are approved through a Conditional Use Permit[CUP]process. Separate CUP's will be required if and when the applicant is ready to proceed with the construction of the accessory buildings. A Conditional Use Permit shall be approved if it is found to meet the following criteria: 1. The proposed use conforms to the district permitted and conditional use provisions and all general regulations of this title. The subject property is zoned B-3. The use of the property as an auto sales lot is a permitted use. Additionally, the applicant wishes to do major auto repair work out of the existing building. Auto repair, major is a conditional use in the B-3 zoning district. 2. The proposed use shall not involve any element or cause any conditions that may be dangerous, injurious or noxious to any other property or persons and shall comply with the performance standards listed below. Staff believes the use will not involve any element of cause any conditions that may be dangerous, injurious or noxious to any other person or property. The proposal is similar to other uses in and around the property. 3. The proposed use shall be constructed,designed,sited,oriented and landscaped to produce harmonious relationship of buildings and grounds to adjacent buildings and properties. The proposed use will utilize the existing building on site. The o -street parking will be located on the west and north side of the property. 4. The proposed use shall produce a total visual impression and environment which is consistent with the environment of the neighborhood. Staff believes the proposed use is consistent with the business uses that are in the near vicinity of this property. 5. The proposed use shall organize vehicular access and parking to minimize traffic congestion in the neighborhood. Access to the site will continue to be from the existing driveway that is located in front of the building. Additional parking areas will be added to the west and northern side of the property. 6. The proposed use shall preserve the objectives of this title and shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The subject property is comprehensively guided as commercial. The proposed use is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the Conditional Use Permit allowing major automobile repair to take place on the property addressed as 315 Pine Street,subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant obtains all necessary building permits from the City's Building Official. 2. A sign permit is applied for and approved for any external signage that may be placed on the premises. 3. The proposed parking area must be surfaced with concrete or bituminous and shall be setback a minimum of ten feet from all property lines. . i 4. Other conditions as may be recommended by the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description o Backup Material Application o Backup Material Site plan o Backup Material Site aerial • City of Farmington • 1'?,ja usTRW Masi est .. 01.uQa rr%dJwhyalsur CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Applicant 1)1 nice, Telephone:( f ax: (- Addrass: 1-4N' e T r b vrr Ati,e44//1kk p/ O Street / CAW State Zip Code Owner: J'/l gst,Li 4Q, Telephone:(6.1131 9'46' $6)OFax: Li Address: AO l A3L.' et tt-g2r 21/if) S'iO? Street city State Zip Code Premises Involved: 3/1 j0/It)P ST. Address/Legal Descripktir 11 block,plat name,section,township,range) Current Zoning District 1) e tr 3.3Current Land fUs/e Specific Nature of Request:i�-e.c4C rfn 1 `I2€ y Permit- reeAf LiJGI J o/C rec-oNL,�I�II P 19/1 i kty) 4A e 5 t)+li wo(1t tYGi,t��'�jc"'Or/G tel/taL' �71t�/G? 44,44A $iJBMITTAL REOiBRI�IVT3 Yeyvi :)`,r lc.i 5 Jo' e r ttc. -S, ' 5hie 4/eir O Proof of Ownership 0 6 Copies of Site Plan i C't*U ., 0 Application Fee 0 Abstract/Residential List(required 350'from subject property) 0 Boundary/Lot ey 0 Torrens(Owner's Duplicate Required) 160 /-i6-rr 6--/Y-74• of Owner Date Signature of Applicant Date Request Submitted to Planning staff on For office use only Public Hearing Set for: Advertised in Local Newspaper: Planning Commission Action: Approved Denied Fee Paid • City Council Action(if necessary): Approved Denied $200—City of Farmington $46—Dakota County Recorder Comments: Conditions Set: Planning division: Date: 9/06 DRAFTED BY: Cky oerissicat 4.10 Third k,ut lamigbn MN 33024 ______....._.... .... ..ii. fi..•i.,"1:.-li..:*.r.:4;f1:::!ef.i.s,...:.i,....,..,• ;.. .0,-,...v.,zi;;•44417-_::."".."''.;,.•:',....'''...;;:--;L-1 ...I. . . . _tr.4.:;,:!Iii.l..1!"...!.;;•:-::•:1:-.:;.4i ! 3. 4':.:7-',...i.::.1/41.'''.0::; ••'AI IN..:,•':.h....„, ::'..:!!,.'t;'::•;11-.e".•::"..;P:::!:!!..:."jtaq'"'.:'•'''"' '.:-:: '.:": :.:.,.:!-', 1:17,;:•71.:.•:•',,T,i.,J,,31.•:,''.;:',.'*`.!•",--e,i•:"-, "-i":-.'i, "Pkt:71.r!'11;'Z''.:r .1 1: 1.,•'•:f-'.%q-:;:••• ••••-•••'-:!.;•:•:;;'. :-•"..,•, :::',0. :•::•-4*.=;•:,.,'•,.'6!. ,t,:i i,....'3'.1•, .1.:A.1 ,I.,:.•-t-:::..W.V.:Li'ff.•••,:••••;•..; -.i:,,:';•4.;,,!,,ivi•:!--r.:•itiv.i.J':,.,,•„••:it'•77;1....::: .":i7 iit.r,il• / i 14::r.?,...:.•:1!-:.:e.::=...t,••Ny.t.i.,•:•iv•-:,...,-.......,,.4,4:::-,-1.4;. ;,....7.*1c,•:It ..7.::,......,;2.....:::•••••:--.- •:.k: ;•••••:.Ti.:•'•)• -,......--t:-.21:1;i::::•: -•,!-:.•,;e••••*iy..k..,:ls,. .1..:1.,..• • A l'F4::::1;kc‘..)-1':41.::-;',-:(- '.;:;:d-If..1:ieii,*•'-:,::tni Lii-,'..t q?,•'.I..,!..4*:.1: .1.•-.J: .:;:i.c4;•-•,57i.;V44:- ..,..::::1;i•2:;:.;,.z:•••::,...-?,,,,,A.,y;4•:-....v:..1.•-..-cr:::.4;',&„•,c.:,:.1 f.', :,:d...4.1..e,•ii,...T.......i:,/;.,1;r.L.r.r- •„....,,,-,•-...per..;:4,,I.,•=•:-••,-.14.• -'• ;,1„...-...,;•-t.11...i., "•:.; •'•-••i•Nli.e: ..,, •••'`•• S••••• `/•IV';••.1.."; /- ,,, ,;',.,_...,,i..:...ii:.;,:t.;.f: •;'''',.".f 0. VV.:11..•.f.: .1. -i ,'" •" ";'t'''! '''..":•7,:sr,Ki; -,''`..';,•-•":•-'1:-....."..1'f.P2`.;';':'''!..tr': ';:•1 •-•i'''./...." • '. ,--:'!":11...:,11.,-.Fa.*::'.f:',••ii..”?!: 7i,•.:%•:'''.•*,:.•,,.....1%,..'1.**T`'..:;.• "7:----..,j: ,•:. ..t.tt!.:4,-...;,,i •se., ........,,• ..1,•.:S..:4.,..j•• . ,:.1...:,11...,, ,. „, / . •••;,...:1.4.4,,..1-,...,1-5. ...,.t4t,';.••C;f'Ar:''•, :"-.••:.` ‘.••,.•:....:,:-”,e 4.••• •: .7•-' e:1*.".. .P.4.;-:1.:-.:'''' ss,:.•••.. ;- :,.„,,..,.i.r.4,%`-1.4.),.,.;•,... ;',...,.... . • • :.•. `•=i*,.1;i4:.•:.•:1,-4.;.,:,.: -,'.6 t:.:•:,;*:‘':::;;.:•P's...1•••/A.2::;;,:.‘;':..,..6%.:L,:i'.-7i•.471,•.:-.:.,.4*,,•:•''':\t•.;:i.;;;17;.?int-,.•...4;.,..L:-...:„ .1:::.• I :.h.-.;i t".''."_-.•:.:\ ' , ,..43gg iipv-eiNi-v-.41:.••,••:i•-•:E..--:•'•- •••••••;;;s4-'-ei-,-• 1.-•,'/if......! t:... :;,-..:4,11e,, :li:,..r.-iliii :••.;.3.'.:.41,...! -V.17.:::;;11,1P.I.ifz•••'.*:1.-t ,•-•1-Cs•••• 1 / :At•gritiliaii0::irSti':;''.'''••••••-.44:i."-,i'd.11:::.•••'4't•-'31.1:!,•-tl•i!. .-• ;;/:"'•';/',41!'•••:•i•-•q**-'!:\'-''s : .i:1'...'.'•‘.. ••••:•••:••;•!'•:••• •':::•1'-'•11.ii..114:14 ;11i1-5'.1. • V • " ::Z.-..41.7..,::„...z-..:.ty.,...%,;?....A.,.„..,:t.--0-0::•irivi.74:-..::.,.1, -0.-e.,•1•42,.*.,.... ;....,..:::•.?•,.,..1.4.--4: ".•:fiat,...•4;.•.1„..;,: ..-•i‘:i•-:t...--.1.•;;.4:.2:y.:,..,•p.,....v.i.•;.09-.-4.•p..1 k.t...1,... . . - •• L'•g:Tii•Ni.eAf:ATi-IfiticV.:45..litle.,,I.•;1;k10:•:..-•-•.?::,7-1•1 trz.:-..:.x....1 4'..7...4'..;1:k '-;:ifN,f,r1",..,1',.,-, ky.';'.17:::',3•;,:,,••'.i:s.•=-4..x.:;:::_ki•liell.i..p.,:!••••:!.,;(..:•;.,,%.•,.. ' . : •iA-g.:?)...t?.,'411,2.441kiAliA14.10:4‘45Z-1.i-fs•n..a.re••••:7":';.2.47:.!'.:•'•.. ... li)1',;"?..4.".'f'3''.1'.11 . ,7•6!::-.7t...a....i..;,-:-.".!..:!:•':?..;.13'.....i,•-4•:..tilir.,'-k,:'::;;',-.1:;•.,:„.•-:.:: . :. - 110P!5'Ati- :1•;,:. ig'..,:1/4.$1;t.,r4i.6••••;.?7"."7'...95 ;.4_ 4 ?"/ .4:‘:::-.41?„ . ,.:•.;i"..- -;':•.....i.c.!..'TlA-t.).4, 4.1.::.:'...- Rql.:i1VLiktS:i1f..,:!1.:41 ,10-'...TiI :".",i,''s....,f:iittl:/.2:'.'zi il,"1,:st.-:,-.. lir-a41;14w,fee:74.$ !;,-."*.-, ......"' `:•3•/.N.,:le.... •:..".*Als.i ;.:';:::..; '.• •::;- 1:.'• ,:lt.;45.'-,..,_'•'''':Ef:41:-..!;;Vi:44.1_,5:::;:".2!-C.i.l.::?.;:i,•:::qiit'it:'-'19,7it.z°. 711,(fai iti- ,,,','-'41,::Ir. ,'1, is:•::'...: .7..... .":1'•:!:•!r.5;:,),:....M i i.,,S:i...:.c,,.......1.•,.:,..:•....•:.::,.:. ,,,• n:.1/41:..7.,..z..-...:-.4,-...14-.,-!::•iti4,„..i44:4::.:,„..,.-•„. ,..ir i .i. 10_ ::, ,,... .,...._4. •. FENCE...7,:e.:;.•:T.•,:,..i;•;.!:2...Q.V„c;.,1,1-t...-!. ..;:,;*. 'II i'.. '....aci,,,,.1...f.:-*:••«,:r11;1::::::.c...g..ir:..-so,4;,:,.:r. --.....:76;...5-6•• • '-r-r,.11 .7., tr.....,f .. „,...42 hp- ,, .,-,!..,.....,.....::.511,3c11 ti.,,...L..:...:, .•. ...4....,;.,t." f.;;;;, ,,::i=1..*(7 tt-•:,•-41...-.o.7-....:-1.•..9':;11::1'!Ilt.'•'i:.4.'...`4:'"i 7 ;- r V"' ._.6.>'''',•':rf„,_,;,---'411.,„ I":;-,,'..,,t.,:•:•::,::,..r.::•*.liP.i.. ..Yilt•kg-.'!`:Ite . - •:•'...:::•;;'::;:•.:-.• •"''',,i4r, ''"•::'.1-•!•-.:'•'44''•;.1:'.ehr•-;:..-:.;6....-,:•••,,:.. . ,....*:;:.;•.. •,,,, . ::::..i....L.:. ••••••••••••••f*:,•st- •••••%,.....- ; ' ' -4..r 1 . ' • '.. '''' ' :;114 r•........•%... :,••',,,,.....1%...1.1,:....i,., • .:. ...?.44..3..e.• .. "„•,,,'...4.0.1.0:,4.14:.........!.”-r:,.......'.•*.•:F.A.!ealzt..-,S.A il..t?'.ii:'*1..;IC_ ' 11 ,..,44,k' 4449. ..i,..,.5.,..?.. .:4 .:;...: ; •,..f:Ti-..1..m.,,,),;•VArAl•t?!.?-A • .4:,,..F.t. -.A, ....K"`••".";14'..:"2- iii•:ri.P4 : .,• . fl,g4•00 -.' ,.,:w•-...T.; ..:.--,,f,-....,-,-.::..0.‘-;:ui,.:-;1?;i-s.-- ...-.....1..i.,::.14:414;ii4.4•L • 'II '.3Ff. ,,..,-,...,:,,:_-%,,,.,.,...•:„.....,•••,. •-•-•.:,t, ,..„1.,•:_-:•-.;), -..,:. • -4,-$ ....,%• ,..:-.,-al, !.....,-,•:-:::!.:•.;•;;,,: ak..,. -• • ---,---:. itos,:....:...-•,..--6. • .11!'!•1::'.-.1k-•,...i.--,.-Ei-.::-.'•••••ii.:77-;AN:ni..q.::tyy.. -..-;,:4-s,...:..11. 1 44.:4,,:p.),41.-,,,,„•,bi,„ -VI' , :_;:,L,!...!-:::,:...,;,.....17;•i•„...„.2,v, .':, :::,:.i,„..1.,.,,r.,,,,,d,Aii....„.., , . '.:11'••.- .''..r...,,;!L.TP•ft,Nliikli:f.ki-*A-113:'': .:',' .1 .. "r4 ilest','7 -liM .:i.,1•'2'...'..:L....(1•:;•.'..•••••7::-'`;'.-.1 ...'..),••••41'.;•;44;*::•••:!?':•.'"1:.: '... • 11 \ i.2''.:•,,!:\.:elf.i•if.,:.i.r_12::::'t:':.-f•1::... .,R:••• :.' ,','. ., ,. c. .. ;..,;: _., i...,:;.2:.•7•;',,,z k;,..-:,;..,...i5,;,,::,):3... ...-..I :,.....!..!,-:•.i,e:r.lil.i..i: :... c2-4-*•:' 100-Year Flood..., .: ::5,..,k.,...,.. I ..:-,,,,;; d.,4 4 ,54 ..., ....,•,:... :.;:,....:4,.i,..ts ....!.......,.:,.ii:......I.,:,.!1.-k,....-. :. . • :':,,::••••••-•L 1•4 1421.014;i:2C Elevation...898.0 2*•.41:34; '•*4 , ;., riTill... il,,,,;R,„,fiii.,....,,,,.?..i., ....§„ft.::::).riz.,.i...:.=..,.e::::..,,:.7...:.14 5.,r,11.4:,..1:::1,,,i,;..,4...:::.....4)i •-•k,,,-\-.-•,,,_,..vg?:•;(--,.,.)-• •,•••--v•- 1••• '''•;.ri..1-e• r•-s ,' 'Ti.r-l't.1 t••,•v, ..E447416',„,,,cag 4",•-1 1'',•:•'...-.. :-. .-;:"/••••••:t•••• •..1.-yek'..:!%ib.-54:::•.151,1;•::i•.-7,3-.f: .."--.24' ,,•:-1.1..:e•-•::..i..itkr.i:!:.;.•.:::;,.1. ..:i.,i•74-14?)..,14..!.'.'• ' •:.-F.',-?;" kiRt A'A' Alitt,y1,=. Ai IL,:i A...,....:;•-Yi''?':•.-: :'•:•.:••.?: ---- •......4..-N,i:!"..!1.:•.':„ WItik:, ilMili.",k4V2:1.1'•:'"i"!.•;•:,-'•A'..••;••••'.11 1Y T....4171... k,•: ••••••:;t! ;VI''•,.: liEdig.11 .1.,..;.,,••:....::::-. .!.;...•:.:„.--• \,‘ ......'-••,•-- , - --•-•- •.zi.+1.,t'i.:;:77.•"ij...N.:•'ilit71':.•*:'It••!:3'.. r --:„ - E!.., . .• •:f;I• , • ,, .? . .::.,, 4.::,".1•4. . ''. .t.i..1,V1.e....'• Er.•:.''.Q;,...::, ..•-•t..:. .• ::".,1 .',: , 1••• 0-,'.y.' "...iik.m I ' .:,,....,j:, _.,...---'-'...•.:.ii A••*. ...../ ';!•••••`I'S-:• ••\711•!"4':'17.1.''•••••••••••• ;A•7.iV'•.1:::'.;•••••:'' •::•-,.'.1-• .'. : , !.,,b,- •••11,3)7..,44-'111 ;.:.. . .• •:..... ..:, - •,z.1,1"..., ..:,v..:.,-4.:'-%44,. 4,-1.1,,;!;-t.,.:::. • F, • ,L,e•iirw...• 1 .:;•:, •.• ... ."- .•••:.er ;40 --•1:- . ‘ 4-*-'_-•e;:..?rliz:,.... :...........-„,-..:.,.-„, 1 k,•,4 .1eY4's!'Rir'?1.-../.,'. ,s••..;•....7:::•"i89.4e":*.NI;:.,r.'` ,::-...!•:.• iki!.4.••.1.....:),,,....51 r • ., 5,. • -•.••-4 -Nit '" e • •• • . ....1., :T.•I _V.1•-•III‘i.,:71,;:!'-....*1.,;.J.i..x••:.ir.i..f.k-k.u•r*:••:wif:\•'1•-i. I s':' •‘' ' 4.-•-•.-.1. '1 i i imp '..V.::F.S.1141:5•11.-A4.•'.4.;,447.: -.=4.,•'6.1.."...i i.....•T.•.:,..:. .s.• . ". .,_. .. x•,, . -.,:-..." .._, . .. l% • `-%•\•-•`..,er.k:16•4-1:•'--i:Fr.'..1.•v.ti l•-tf•-•,.,...:.;:,.•:•,•• 1.)442..i.,;:::; - .. 4 ri.. , •-•T • - i. . ,Idll • i • .. .„_. , ....... . .•..•• •••••••:. r• ••••:,.,),•,.!;.....:•..3.,si:::•••.:......,! l'.•,-.,.:.•• . ,. .... • .,,_,.. ,0- . p •: ... '.... . .: '. k''''. 'Ill.:.:1:'1'.A.':.''''3 V;Tr.:17;•14.s"\:',::''.-..:...:.k• :1 • ft... .0•11,,t9"' GATE •,,,r. : i i. .1:•:..',.:.;;;:\ •. •••• •: 1 ;41t'•1!?A*1:1:*:::11:;•:.Xi-V:Kr.-?.,,::,;:-4,-;:a7.-•:1.4'::...4,413k,.. -4:1 e:,•?:•,-„, ..-.ur.e,-,-;' •-•,_•• -...-4.•••: : •-., :• •:: -••••!... • .'•-•41.---:ir:..:-:::-..1, .•ISX4. )..::Al_7;lici'. firs:74.--- -: ,'. . . .:4,r,o1 ..•,:, :... :71.-ti..:.......?F. • ..:....:. • •-1,..1. igit,,-. -.-,•,...i , .,x....!,.. ,:::;::-.:: .._ .7.... 46 itc,. ,e i,4-• ."... .....,j....4,.1.... -.•-..- • ,. ...... . ., • .411•71P:4•4-1:::i".e•-...i.i.&•-.:ylpis:•::.•::. ki''''':,,,' : . .:,'1 1-..-:e.'s"'r."--41 ;-:IN.,-;•:...: *.,..:-1•1 Vi. •••••••:::'.'..*- •'•••'.••• . 1: .-,:S,--, • \ I•:•1:1•"ff.:t44•Ji. ..:•••• f--''`:.•*f .f.i:t.:•V4 1.•;•!1• ann --i,4. ag ' '• C.--4,1 i-A--.. `I-I-Ii-tc.r.i?:!;V-...%•••...v.:.-•:‘•,..oHNiL-.P„....:,,- .-„. ;:i!,. - 7„,.....: Aer'" , ii kiy-414!-Iti.q!c.;7.-':: :.,i'fc..!•!;,"-...,•:•::-...,1• 77-,..mili ..,,,,, ,;..„.., - ..:i_:::: ::::. .. tvz.l.y...:p1;.:5;:...,,,yek...:, ,,,1•,ic;,::::.....c...:........1„.,....i.,.......; .. • si 4,,,::•-e:-...,..i:::.4-.';! .:.;•::.:.: ....,.3. ..4;..f.;i:;•:l'-?.',.•v „li, ii, i •.Exist„,9 cLor 4,.A.-.%:-.4?....-tNi,,q..,,,.-i-,.-:::::-,-,;:......,--..44,f.,... ;.•-..:,--,--, :• - . ti.,*•44.1cki•r.•:.i•a:k;....:...5-!;.1.A.•,•;••fic .;„..i;.-elix,F, ,F; .-`..-4-' :it • 4.1..L.:•4:1-. .... - it':*r'i."::r.i;•••••;:!•i;!'•:•.1'•E:•'•:•'''r•i;':'0•,;;L:::_,:•)..i....i - '*4.• if .."..,....,;-",•,.:4.• . „ 4..,.1„b„.14-....,..."...kl,.•....: . .,-.*:i..i..........it.;&.A: 1.,-*•41.1/41.,g'::;!•*li.N.-;1'.; : k:..;!‘;:.i:::.•:'.74_!. ..Acle : • ,...._. • A -.:::,..:i.:::.,.livel...„..Ir...!. .....,....„..w.. ...i.:( :...:::.. .A.:1 1\e ; 4.."4:1F...f::,:l•vi..:4;is!,••:-AIL 1.,:y4),$...•Itir.„4,„, ,. 2 Proposed ..,...., •..-.:4-..;,...1 :..,•,...q...., '4 •;-: ,;•••irio.r-:ut..,1.,rtf4i.:-i:-;1.:*;i:-.4-*.i• ..;:0,.._ :,-.. ylitc,,,,#• ., n • Overhead•°oak,i1,:i..:•::.,j. i,,..:..:::„.4.....,:::,x.-..i:-:".r:rx„!:,,1 1 . : ':..:•;...04.1- ii-!4•-•;-:''ik.•-...!...;1; i::•:•;4•3-.:':!. 0. Wir,,•:,,::•,,4,k__,,-.7.-,. . ---'--' •-• . N.k3-.,,,:':;.:,..4f4:'-7.":!:;;•E.,:r,i-!'‘.... I( '\ \ry.,1;4„Z*4 lr :Xlilcipr '.. Existing • ':,11:•4'11....!''.;''.::•••‘....,••,-,,::::,::i;•,-:-.i•.:::.••••:•'-..-1•. :4,',. ..„.:. \_. Vi.1 i.•16,......54i4 i)•,•1_,.;;;;,•.••s:•?..wc-.Tefu..%•••.4 ':.-'1•4.: ...•i.,,,. .i..... ..i-`,7 '1, ; B gang _' IR:gi:.,N,.;..,..,,,....::t;•-.1:,14...!ityt.;i; .. .1.3.11.44..0"..t..:.:-)::,,,, N7::!N.:6 e.:•'•.::*"-::•q.".•:',"C:f.-iii,C_41-4,i-f;5,:l.;-:':1;•;.! 1 fq,-;iFtt470'..411, , u _ .... „.....,. ..,. ......,;„..:....:1„,... .,...,_....i,,,,.., 7\ `..,4f,'.1 1*•••:Z;";;41;"•1-''ovri:1-6-111.;,/-4-1Y144::i,i::"'4$744,-e,,T;f1.4-4' - ••• • FFE.903.7;,..; t..g.,!....A.;:_.F.:;.,....,.;:.,.......i.,......„...,,,,:..........t.,,,,a... 1„.:....,pcf; il: •,,P-X.:,.''-'-xttAtil,0•41-ag,*rt.,.-ri t qiii•,ci.'e't,..441,- a ty.,d. ..- `1.., .....j?• i;',..EL•;;;!•:-,...i.q?..4. ':Za...i.,:Vi•‘i,3'?.?'14:::i..!iftj:::1%;.• •••e?.?titie2i„,Vatiallik4.• 14/4.1%:•1 .3;"i 4'.40r,44Werjr ilt: : ...:•:*: .,,,,.:i,,r.-:14-.,_ . •:' A... I 7.•,;1; ,i.,'4 :‘..,',-,,,,,a„t,_.,E," ;' ,-,,, , • ;•••••••';''..:•:;:•••: 4.;",:l'r...;":".i-..%."Weat. '''''.1!‘:F%.,'it''67,21'....?f.r.: i•". r.1 :'' "i11-7,91,-i':•:,.7*!•-;;F:`,,t,e.',TilizLI:'‘;:fillkatf4-,!•11' "l'''''14', '-'7"4" A.1' adstklg ' . . . ,. ,:. ,:...i.:t........4.r. It'F,' ":1."';''..4:1`k`tif:t'41ilk'illi'it'ilk3"4:'-'41c.:-":4;'/:tirk•Is'i':, 4,'''r.ti .,..m.t.-<;;'..::rv,.....„`!a...,-.0..,;•••-v.,„,..iitils. i. ,,,,,•„_,,,. ,,4.i,,, ,.; . ,Overhead Door;•Apt!'..K:i.`*:,?!...!•,,:i1;•-.4• ,.. ,. 4,...r.-. .•• • ..-f 7,.... ,.. •1:•,:Kit•ri!F••••••:,,:z......Ncez•:!:,.;tshs,:-.•-....4-....i-q.. --;;;-",--=.02‘," 1 ,•',. ";•.'..:1• ,;,iii,"-',F.'ii::":7,‘J'..-:-..i i,;.i.,;:.-,:::••;,.. -1.::..•, !,-..-:.• . . V ... :1K.i.c.c,V4,4,.„,1ciaTiri:W44,041 ....:I.:.;:::. Zk'.';.„...;ke4;41,11, .-,_ ),•- ,.....,......:, !, s!l2j:. +,1171e•siN•-"':...ij.3:ria4.4.iiNtgiiLleitif"'ir,..*--:w•••;, k4. .,.. • ,- t.......:..:,:-01;„•;•,,,-1.:•-.. ,;•.:......,.;.•:...:,. ...,.. ,, • • ..•!--•:--::i.,•:.:.,wi•••-,7:....-44:-..31.,:i43,-..,..i.:: :v.,-.--!,..„. t44.1...Vi;',::4=.'',9.=•,;;,,kiCK4#11.11)..., '...rIltv1-4 .,,f4e • ' • ..--- • • '-. V.F.:••16:;t714.1!-:1%':. 1,;.!.;4:;..r).4.;:17:?:- ii ,i4-`1VII,1,1/4iat.',....!..Nrilig.ii..r.,:1;:•.:...f....94.„.0,!,...:: ••Alohom-,,,,o • .,,, k . .. • ,.........f.,\ -...:,11..:.,. ..t.•;.:. ... wa........5.1..., ••• . . . . ... • • . liff.,._,_e..--44,4-r,tf.,....f.!-,47...., 1,11,,,v,..,:. i.,-,:,:.i..-- .,filt,34 _, . • , s, --- - .,zr-:::-:-.,. ..:.,-....1....,f•.21;,. II,...;.;.:!..,:,,,:ii,ixf...-4.:!:.-:..• - . I ' 'vzi.-..:w,:•,4;:::;;I:ts•:::::LII:.: -.1...t.,..:::.-.1,•:•:ri. 10.- - .4. .,,oe,, ..4 -• - N.Z- ;•,,*..!Vit.....nr::"vi,E:t.....- --;. 7•:tr,.r.i<-1.::::;" I ''''''4E,,ii';!..,IN,:,...34:.il•:::-•'• ;-,••','..tv....;:',.- •. • • al,`.5....;•1 • y.: ..:1., ..:::!..:-....• `'.'14 . • '-'.'•••••••'.1'4•3.:-...-4 i...50,3.I. i i f.-AA'14.1,7......f':.:11 ..a...!....i•........:.:if'..i'.;f"'N',•:::'.:....: • ..‘ *De; • . .•••••••rk. i....:"4' ... . . . 71'''.. • " •-. • '1; •. •.- \P.'"V t 1. :'.-44-. '••, .:.••:.4:•‘.;•::.-E;'‘.":-'‘'..-• ' . : • ,71., •c-;: • : . `v 7' • /: . \ • . • - ' • • • t • • • • .. . . •• , 1 Dakota County, MN ''-iiiiikl r . 0 :: : '- , . ' - 1 '..-' $..4 .1100r" -:� .),11a ` ' t( i ,f�5t �, ;i f. A ., t,Y r r , Y ''.' , '. "...'-.7-4'eht. -.-` ,' - ,`,:-.:4,;', ° i--.7-1•1! , ,-,_,--.-,-' .:w . l�� .s� C3 {vIli , . at - I , +'i r ...oil . y' 1 fl" 14--,Y,4....... fi . a �, '�Alt' ....it ,i , : ' -‘,,,7_'_, "... :77-,d, ''1:' ' - ' ': ' ' ' ;,...!i. 1 15541;:t* '' ''''.'r kik, .r, I Wi 'it.,.... t rrt g '' r7 � sa « re1Y -41'„r!",,, n . 1,v i f ....,.i.i,;;:,.„..a .7:- -4'.,,g,ct,_r.F.. (' ir IV q June 8, 2017 1:1,200 0 55 110 220 ft , ' i t ' , I 0 15 30 60 m Property Information Dakota County Disclaimer.Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate,but accuracy is nonot guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,eppraisal,survey,or for zoning verification. CITY OF 0 430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARM I N GTO N © 651-280-6800 111 ® FarmingtonMN.gov TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager SUBJECT: 2040 Comprehensive Plan update and implementation schedule DATE: October 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION Staff wanted to give the Planning Commission an update regarding the current status of the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan update. DISCUSSION As the Commission is aware,the city was granted an extension for submittal of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update to the Met Council. That extension was granted through June 30, 2019. The plan update was officially submitted to the Met Council on June 28, 2019. The city then subsequently received an Incomplete for Review letter from the Met Council on July 22, 2019 outlining areas where the plan was deemed incomplete. Since receiving that letter staff has been working with our consultants to address the incomplete comments within the plan and supporting documents and resubmitted an updated plan to the Met Council on September 12, 2019. The deadline for Completeness Review by the Met Council for the resubmittal is October 3, 2019. At the time of writing this memorandum (October 2nd)staff had not received confirmation if the plan update was found complete or incomplete by the Met Council. Staff will provide the Commission Members with an update at the regular meeting of the completeness status of the plan. If the plan is deemed complete it would then move on to the various committees in the Met Council for review and final adoption. Once the plan is approved by the Met Council the plan must be officially approved and put into effect by the City Council. Upon approval by the City Council a nine month timeframe starts for updating the city's official controls to be in compliance with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This would include updating the City's zoning ordinance for compliance with the comp plan as well as including zoning changes that were contemplated with the recently approved Trunk Highway 3 Corridor Study. Over the next month staff will be putting together a work plan and schedule outlining the timing for these zoning changes. The start of the 9 month timeframe for bringing the city official controls in compliance with the Comp Plan will ultimately be driven by whether or not the Met Council finds the city's resubmittal complete on October 3rd. As of now,the staff intent is to have the work plan and schedule on the November Planning Commission agenda for review. ACTION REQUESTED None. This is being provided for informational purposes only. CITY OF 0430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARM I N GTO N © 651-280-6800 -41=- "'--..../"'��` ® FarmingtonMN.gov TO: Planning Commission FROM: Adam Kienberger, Community Development Director,Tony Wippler Planning Manager SUBJECT: H PC-Certificate of Appropriateness Request for Exterior Work-345 3rd Street (Fletcher Building) DATE: October 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION The powers and duties of the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)were assigned to the Planning Commission earlier this year. Please see the attached staff memo regarding a request to the HPC for a certificate of appropriateness for exterior work at 345 3rd Street(Fletcher Building). DISCUSSION ACTION REQUESTED ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Cover Memo 345 3rd Street- Fletcher Building Certificate of Appropriateness Memo 10-8-19 D Backup Material Heikkila EDA Grant Application D Backup Material 345 Third Street Landmark Report D Backup Material Secretary of the Interior Standards CITY OF 0430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARM I N GTO N © 651-280-6800 FarmingtonMN.gov TO: Planning Commission/Heritage Preservation Commission FROM: Adam Kienberger, Community Development Director Tony Wippler, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Certificate of Appropriateness Request for Exterior Work- 345 3rd Street(Fletcher Building) DATE: October 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION/DISCUSSION Building owner Pam Heikkila of Heikkila Studios is requesting a "certificate of appropriateness"to conduct exterior renovations to her building located at 345 3rd Street. Per City Code 2-11-5(C), No permit will be issued by the city unless a certificate of appropriateness has been granted by the HPC.A copy of the certificate of appropriateness shall be attached to the permit when issued,and a copy filed with the city building official. This building, known as the Fletcher Building built in 1877,was designated a Heritage Landmark by the City Council in 2001 via the Heritage Preservation Commission.A copy of the original supporting documentation from then HPC preservation planning consultant Robert Vogel is attached. City Code 2-11-4 outlines the process for Heritage Landmark designation: 2-11-4:DESIGNATION OF FARMINGTON HERITAGE LANDMARKS: (A)Eligibility Criteria: The following criteria shall guide the HPC and the City Council in evaluating properties for designation as Farmington heritage landmarks: 1. The quality of significance in history,architecture,archaeology, and culture is present in buildings,sites,structures, objects and districts that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and: (a) That are associated with specific events or a pattern of events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history;or (b) That are associated with the lives of persons or groups significant in our past;or (c) That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type,period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master builder, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity those components may lack individual distinction;or (d) That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. 2. The singular physical appearance,historic character or aesthetic value of an established or familiar feature of a neighborhood or community within the city. (B)Findings Of Significance: The HPC shall determine if a historic property is eligible for designation as a Farmington heritage landmark and issue a written finding of significance. (C)Council Designation, Hearings: The city council, upon recommendation of the HPC, may by resolution designate a Farmington heritage landmark. Prior to such designation, the city council shall hold a public hearing, notice of which shall have been published in the official newspaper at least ten(10)days prior to the date of the hearing and mailed notice sent to the owner(s)of the property which is proposed to be designated a heritage landmark and to all owners of property lying adjacent to the historic property. (D) Communication With The Minnesota Historical Society:Prior to designating a Farmington heritage landmark, the city shall forward information concerning the proposed designation to the Minnesota Historical Society for review and comment in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Annotated section 471.193. (E) Designation Of Heritage Landmarks On The Zoning Map:The city shall place designated Farmington heritage landmark properties on the official city zoning map. (Ord. 099422,2- 16-1999) Ms. Heikkila is seeking approval from the HPC to proceed with improvements being planned for the building.These proposed improvements include: • Replacing missing bricks, brick repair and tuckpointing with restorative work on various deteriorated areas on both the Oak Street and Third Street sides of the building base • Put new stucco on two brick walls - the north wall along the walkway between the buildings and the upper back side which faces the parking lot • Install sheet metal flashing at the roof base Please see the attached contractor bids for additional detail on the project scope. Any work done on Heritage Landmark properties is required to follow city code 2-11-5 and 6: 2-11-5:DESIGN REVIEW: (A)Review Of Permits: The HPC shall review and make recommendations to the city council concerning the issuance of city permits to do any of the following in relation to a property designated as a Farmington heritage landmark: 1. Demolition of a historic building or structure. 2. Moving a historic building,structure, or object. 3. New construction of a principal building or accessory structure. (B)Alterations: The HPC shall determine whether the proposed activity will alter, disturb, deface or materially change the appearance or use of a heritage landmark. The HPC may recommend to the city council conditions for permit approval that it deems reasonable and appropriate. (C) Certificate Of Appropriateness:No permit will be issued by the city unless a certificate of appropriateness has been granted by the HPC.A copy of the certificate of appropriateness shall be attached to the permit when issued, and a copy filed with the city building official.A certificate of appropriateness shall become void twenty four(24)months after issuance unless a city permit has been issued. (D)Development Projects:Every application for a preliminary or final plat, variance or conditional use permit in relation to a significant historic property in the city shall be reviewed by the HPC and their recommendation shall be forwarded to the planning commission for consideration in making their recommendation to the city council. In determining whether or not a project will have an adverse effect upon a significant historic property, the HPC shall consider the following factors: 1. Whether the development will substantially alter the appearance of a historic building, site,structure, object or district so as to remove the features which distinguish the historic property as a heritage landmark;and 2. Whether the use of the property will destroy, disturb or endanger a known or suspected archaeological feature. (E) Design Review Standards And Guidelines:The secretary of the interior's standards for the treatment of historic properties shall be the required basis for permit review decisions. The city may adopt design review guidelines;in the absence of such guidelines,design review decisions will be based upon the current secretary of the interior guidelines for preservation, rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction. (F)Outside Technical Advice: The HPC may seek technical advice from outside its members on any design review. (G)Appeals:Any party aggrieved by a decision of the HPC shall, within ten(10)days of the HPC's action approving or denying a certificate of appropriateness,have a right to appeal such decision to the city council. When denying a certificate of appropriateness, the HPC shall advise the permit applicant of their right to file a written notice with the city administrator requesting city council review of the action taken by the HPC. Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the city administrator shall transmit one copy to the HPC. (Ord. 099- 422,2-16-1999) 2-11-6:VIOLATIONS AND PENALTY It shall be a misdemeanor to alter, disturb, deface or materially change the appearance or use of a designated Farmington heritage landmark without a certificate of appropriateness. (Ord. 099-422,2-16-1999) Per city code,the current secretary of the interior guidelines shall serve as the basis for design review decisions.These guidelines are attached for your review. If the work does not meet these standards, it is not recommended that the HPC grant a certificate of appropriateness for that portion of the work,which is required to obtain a building permit. Per the original building evaluation, please note the following: "The Fletcher Building is eligible for Heritage Landmark designation because it embodies the distinctive characteristics of the Italianate-influenced vernacular commercial block property type. It is Farmington's oldest extant commercial building and is notable for its well preserved Chaska brick facade. The property is also historically significant for its association with the broad pattern of commercial development in downtown Farmington." The proposed stucco application to the north and east walls of the building does not comply with the recommendations provided by the secretary of the interior's standards for the treatment of historic properties.Staff recommends an alternative scope of work that preserves the original Chaska brick or conveys the same visual appearance. Staff was made aware of this planned scope of work on September 12th via a grant request to the Economic Development Authority.Staff provided guidance that the applicant petition the HPC for a certificate of appropriateness with a scope of work that complies with the recommended standards of the secretary of the interior. The applicant met with the EDA on September 19th to request a façade grant and was further directed to work with the HPC on obtaining a certificate of appropriateness that complies with city code. Supplemental information provided by the applicant is attached for consideration with this request. ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends denial of the requested certificate of appropriateness as the proposed scope of work including the application of stucco does not adhere to the secretary of the interior guidelines for masonry work on historic properties. Staff recommends approval of a limited certificate of appropriateness for the work outlined to make repairs to the base of the building.This is required prior to issuing a building permit. If the Planning Commission elects to deny the request,they should make the applicant aware of their right to an appeal via Section G of 2-11-5(Design Review) noted above. Downtown Façade Improvement Program FARM I NGTON Grant Application - , APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT(S) P{... e;Ibis BUILDING OWNER TENANT Ya' , kk;/n, Aei9 ADDRESS ADDRESS 3-I S Tl,; 5�iyl CITY,STATE,ZIP CITY,STATE,ZIP MN s S't..) PHONE PHONE ■ EMAIL EMAIL BUSINESS INFORMATION LEGAL NAME OF BUSINESS 1 l a:W :Q4 Pear, I< � ADDRESS 2 41 CITY,STATE,ZIP F+-.�:��IC^ M N, SSot 'S BUSINESS PHONE FEDERAL TAX ID# DATE ESTABLISHED M Ay 2 Pt 2001 OWNERSHIP INTEREST OF ALL PARTIES NAMED ON TITLE: NAME Pit% j e;k t t 4 INTEREST X6,11 ti NAME INTEREST NAME INTEREST 5 PROPERTY INFORMATION ESTIMATED DATE OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 141 l 2Q11 HAS THIS BUILDING BEEN HISTORICALLY REGISTERED? AP PROJECT INFORMATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: /1441594 y w": 111111.11111111111111111110 i 20 MtJArry ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS EXTERIOR/FAcADE ESTIMATED COST 'Y, VV. ELECTRICAL ESTIMATED COST NIont TOTAL ESTIMATED COST 'ff//, 9�S 6 FUNDING INFORMATION A 1:1 match is required by the applicant. For every dollar contributed to funding eligible project costs by the Downtown Façade Improvement Program,the applicant must contribute at least one dollar.The amount of grant to be awarded shall be$1,500 up to$10,000 according to the scale. _ . . TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED$ d>0 7 4 ($1,500 up to$10,000 according to the scale) OW, VrA.o" . jvi0441111 APPLICANT FUNDS if do, 742 3 . \20 t V f , f I6-,._a t 1.1.t1 t44v'. rqt4'4 I/We declare that the information provided on this application and the accompanying attachments is true and complete to the best of my/our knowledge. I/We understand that any intentional misstatements will be grounds for disqualification and that the city of Farmington/EDA has the right to verify this information. I/We agree to provide the project coordinator reasonable access to information and reasonable access to the construction project site so that they may monitor project implementation. APPLIC T(S)/ 142, 041!,11°,10 =''` r ✓�� __ DATE DATE DATE 7 + • MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT—TENNESSEN WARNING In accordance with the State of Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,the city of Farmington is required to inform you of your rights as they pertain to the confidential information collected from you. Confidential data is that information which is not available to you or the public. The personal information we collect about you is private. The information collected from you and from other agencies or individuals is used to determine the disposition of your application with the city. The dissemination and use of the data collected is limited to that necessary for the administration and management of the Downtown Façade Improvement Program. Persons or agencies with whom this information may be shared,include: 1. City of Farmington personnel administering the grant program 2. City Council members,Economic Development Authority members 3. Contracted private auditors 4. Law enforcement personnel 5. Those individuals or agencies to whom you give your express written permission NOTICE PURSUANT TO MS.60A.955 8 r _ „, , y „....,, _ , A , , _ , a 111111111111111 II I Omtaid, r/101 CONSTRUCTION BID 2019: NI _MASONRY _ 952-201-8594 1 AND EXTERIOR FACADE WORK PROJECT: Fletcher Building 349 Third Street, Farmington, MN 55024 651-460-8350 QUOTE: $8,000 Masonry work replacing missing bricks,brick repair,and tuckpointing. Resorative work on various deteriorated areas both on the Oak street and Third street sides of the building base. All work to create a similar look to existing facility. Available for completion prior to November 15,2019. 15831 HIGHLAND POINT COURT ' APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 mrgdu4@aol.com c . SMITH COLE MN LIC#BC-693563 STUCCO &STONE CONTRACT Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: 651,460.8359 09.06.2019 Pam Heikkila Address: Job Name: 349 3"I St. New Stucco on 2 Brick Walls of Building&Chimney City,State And Zip Code: .Job Lcation: Farmington,MN,55024 Same Estimated Project Start: Estimated Project Completion: ASAP ASAP • We propose to perform the following: New Stucco on 2 Brick Walls on Building&Chimney: o Mobilize,Erect Scaffolding as required,Protect adjacent materials,Pull required Permits o NOTE:Owner will have Roof Flashing Adjusted&All Electrical Piping&Gutter/Downspouts Removed and Reinstalled by Others o Prep&Remove all Loose Debris of Brick Walls o Install Casing Bead at Outside Corners on Left&Upper Back Walls of Building for Stucco Termination o install Casing Bead at Existing Stair Case&Around Existing AC Unit o Install Weep Screed at Foundation&Existing Roof Flashing Per Code o Apply Galvanized Metal Lath to Left&Upper Back Brick Walls Only o Apply New Portland Cement Base Coat to all Lathed areas Only o Apply New Acrylic Trowel Texture Finish Coat to all New Stucco Surfaces Only o Color and Texture Approved by Owner o Conduct thorough cleanup,close out Permits and exit site For the Sum of: $31,725.00 Payment Terms: $10,575.00 at Contact Signing-Progress Billings-Balance at Completion Work Excluded: Any Painting/Staining Interior or Exterior,Any Landscaping,Any Interior Work,Any Windows or Door Work,Any Framing,Any Roof Work,Any Structural Work,Any Caulking,Any Heat&Cover,Any Decorative Stucco Trim Work,Any Brick Repairs,Any Gutter/Downspout Work,Any Electrical Lines/Piping Work,Any Stair Case Work NOTICE OF LIEN IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA (SEE REVERSE SIDE) For: Smith Cole Stucco&Stone: For: Owner: Check No: "Building The Future-Restoring The Past" 4443 Hiawatha Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55406 612.709.4980 Rosenquist Construction Inc. 2514 24th Avenue South - Minneapolis, Mn. 55406 Phone: 612-724-1356 - Fax: 612-724-0511 August 29,2019 Project:Fletcher Building,345 3"'Street,Farmington,MN 55024 Heikkila Properties LLC 345 3"d St. Farmington,MN 55024 RE; Quote ATTN: Pam Heikkila PROJECT: Fletcher Building 1. Furnish and install Sheet Metal flashing at roof base flashing at alley and adjacent roofs 2. Furnish and Install Sheet Metal flashing at the top of coping flashing. For the sum of----_----_-------_------_------_--__----_____$1720.00 Exclude: permits PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME WITH ANY QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. Respectfully Greg Reiser ^ Fletcher Building :.....,,' --- . , '4.. , .. s. , / .,.. - : / � ��� � .„ � ~�~� . -:-,, ,..„ .. .. :, ." . . , . 4, 1...-..1.,.;.,..;' ,.. , . . ..,i r - . , . .. . ...... _ ....... Farmington's O|uesf Commercial ommercia| uu' |u 'ng Purpose: To help the economic development of Farmington's historic district via a grant towards the restoration of the Fletcher Building of Farmington. • • r The downtown is scattered with seemingly empty buildings waiting for ,111111”111111 occupancy. But,the Fletcher building has been attacting clients fromh ..., 101? other cities for 15 years. The studio was once selected as one of the r ' ar _ , ; : I ' ' top 20"go-to"photographers in the state by"The Knot", a nation-wide wedding magazine. i � 1 j Nom ,, I tit01 IS' 1, * F , ----.on It needs help to look like this! 10 years ago,it was in good condition. However,we did not realize just how soft the bricks were. The paint started peeling a few years ago. It was unnoticed at first. But,the problem valanced. 2014 I " ti ;,. ti i , q y i, ., „ Illt‘,i ! i l , ,: ( i . 1 .., i r i hi"N i . ,.„-.-,-,,,:::,4,!. .,,,. „ #, , r - , . .i. [ ,, _ 11111, , 1 1 1 ,--,...„,„:111ite. 1 I 1,i ' Ii 4 ____------- _ _ • -0-11,001,7,71 -, r„ = ,. t I C x:44 The structural integrity weakened, seemingly overnight. Brick chips started crumbling onto the ground and caught our attention. Soon,larger pieces of brick began falling on the building behind. large portions of the base of the building separated from the existing brick located on the Oak street side leaving gaping holes. A partial masonry job was started,but was unable to be completed. This also left open holes in the side of the building. This past spring,realizing that the bleeding needed to stop,I contacted approximately 8 different masonry companies. The bids ranged from $129,000 for minimal repair and over$300,000 for more extensive repair. Obviously,to any owner,these prices are not a good investment. Even if money was flush,you would never get a return on that kind of price tag....even at 1/2 that price. The building itself was recently appraised at$305,000. That is if you could find a buyer. If you look at all the buildings in town for sale, well,it is not an easy great market from a business perspective. Where does that leave us as a town? _ _` ' • 4 4' 4 V pat, arVX- I --t. Sirt".4 - 914 /11;-1141k:it -'11) ' 1''' x r i ' ' w A Z A.4 A aim r r • i? h y 'fy.�. • K ••• a�� • • • - + { 1'' �T tr r �: ": `, ., l Imo•^'' rj_• i i .. isoia r %'/�� '' �/ y,t t` ms'T Stopping the Bleeding sn Masonry Prep Work $8,000 Stucco $31,725 Roofing (to be lifted to accomodate for stucco) $1, 720 Total : $41,445 • MASONRY: 24 inch gaps separate from the base of the building where rain runs down the side of the structure and deteriorates the stone/brick walls below. Knowing the rapid damage last winter caused, the structural integrity will likely be compromised over the course of this winter. • ROOFING: They need to pull the roof up to put the stucco up to the top. Recreate a metal flashing system that will go out and over the stucco. • STUCCO: PLEASE SEE BID ATTACHED FOR BRICKWORK BY A LOCAL FARMINGTON COMPANY. THIS WILL SHOW YOU JUST HOW AFFORDABLE STUCCO IS TO HAVE INSTALLED. Stucco is the most cost effective way to preserve the building. This company is able to get it done this year (however it may go well in November and need heat added). EIGHT MASONRY AND OTHER STUCCO COMPANYS HAVE COME, BUT FLATLY TURNED ME DOWN TO COMPLETE THE WORK THIS YEAR. WITH THE FREEZE/THAWS THAT HAPPEN OVER THE WINTER IT IS EXTREMELY TIME SENSITIVE. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation&Illustrated Guidelines for R... Page 1 of 7 Technical Preserv• "• + - - - Br-ick, Stone, Terra Cotta, Concrete, Adobe, Stucco and Mortar Building Exterior Masonr Identify I Protect I Repair I Replace I Missing Feature I Alterations/Additions 11Illil _ ,_ Guldddnes ' ► ;,---- s rr-�` The longevity and 1 -"`r` ')r J 1 '‘ Masonry ,• isieFfr11W toe,* tit . . t 0 tli.d is appearance of a masonry g! • --_- Wood wall is dependent upon the a j Metals size of the individual units - Roofs and the mortar. • - )'"- -fart. ��j, Windows f/ \ y EntranceslPorches Stone is one of the more . A.,? Storefronts lasting of masonry building f/ '.4 Structural Systems materials and has been used ' j N SpecaslFeatureslFinishes throughout the history of Mechanical Systems American building 1880s brick building with terra-cotta trim. construction. The kinds of stone most commonly encountered on historic Site buildings in the U.S. include various types of sandstone, limestone, marble, Setting granite, slate and fieldstone. Brick varied considerably in size and quality. Energy Before 1870, brick clays were pressed into molds and were often unevenly NewA4d410ns fired.The quality of brick depended on the type of clay available and the brick- Accessibility making techniques; by the 1870s--with the perfection of an extrusion process-- HeaithiSafety bricks became more uniform and durable. Terra cotta is also a kiln-dried clay product popular from the late 19th century until the 1930s. The development of the steel-frame office buildings in the early 20th century contributed to the widespread use of architectural terra cotta.Adobe,which consists of sun-dried earthen bricks,was one of the earliest permanent building materials used in the U.S., primarily in the Southwest where it is still popular. Mortar is used to bond together masonry units. Historic mortar was generally quite soft, consisting primarily of lime and sand with other additives. After 1880, portland cement was usually added resulting in a more rigid and non-absorbing mortar. Like historic mortar, early stucco coatings were also heavily lime- based, increasing in hardness with the addition of portland cement in the late 19th century. Concrete has a long history, being variously made of tabby, volcanic ash and, later, of natural hydraulic cements, before the introduction of portland cement in the 1870s. Since then, concrete has also been used in its precast form. While masonry is among the most durable of historic building materials, it is also very susceptible to damage by improper maintenance or repair techniques and harsh or abrasive cleaning methods. Masonry ....Identify, retain,and preserve Elk recommended Identifying, retaining,and preserving masonry features that are important in defining the overall historic character of the building such as walls, brackets, https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/masonry01.htm 9/12/2019 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation&Illustrated Guidelines for R... Page 2 of 7 _' ' = _ railings,cornices,window architraves, _ door pediments,steps,and columns; 3_ S�`-� '��'' and details such as tooling and -�f K bonding patterns,coatings,and color. "�► -.-F iw Materials and craftsmanship illustrated in stone wall. not recommended -�Removing or or radically changing masonry features which are important in defining the overall historic character of the building so that, as a result, the character is diminished. Replacing or rebuilding a major portion of exterior masonry walls that could be repaired so that, as a result, the building is no longer historic and is essentially new construction. Applying paint or other coatings such as stucco to masonry that has been historically unpainted or uncoated to create a new appearance. Removing paint from historically painted masonry. Radically changing the type of paint or coating or its color. Masonry ....Protect and Maintain recommended r , 171, , - Protecting and maintaining masonry by ' 1 providing proper drainage so that water 1" does not stand on flat, horizontal surfaces or accumulate in curved -- decorative features. 1 , Cleaning masonry only when necessary • -i- to halt deterioration or remove heavy soiling. • Carrying out masonry surface cleaning 'i • :;et=:�,• •. tests after it has been determined that ) • . `)t such cleaning is appropriate.Tests • r " • '° .-' should be observed over a sufficient , ti period of time so that both the immediate . .. '- and the long range effects are known to t+4 enable selection of the gentlest method 1 possible. Chemical cleaning to remove dirt from granite. https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/masonry01.htm 9/12/2019 • The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation&Illustrated Guidelines for R... Page 3 of 7 � •- - Cleaning masonry surfaces with the gentlest method possible,such as low pressure water and f • I detergents, using natural bristle brushes. + • 4.11 Inspecting painted masonry surfaces to determine whether repainting is necessary. - �.,« ' Removing damaged or deteriorated paint only to the next sound layer using the gentlest method possible(e.g., handscraping) prior to repainting. ' • Applying compatible paint coating systems following proper surface preparation. Repainting with colors that are historically { • • appropriate to the building and district. ,_ Evaluating the overall condition of the masonry to determine whether more than protection and maintenance are required,that is, if repairs to the " r' masonry features will be necessary. Removing felt-tipped marker graffiti with poultice. not recommended _ Failing to evaluate and treat the various causes of mortar joint deterioration such as leaking roofs or gutters, differential settlement of the building, capillary action, or extreme weather exposure. Cleaning masonry surfaces when they are not heavily soiled to create a new appearance, thus needlessly introducing chemicals or moisture into historic materials. Cleaning masonry surfaces without testing or without sufficient time for the testing results to be of value. Sandblasting brick or stone surfaces Aka k , using dry or wet grit or other --= abrasives. These methods of cleaning permanently erode the surface of the material and accelerate deterioration. Using a cleaning method that involves r - • water or liquid chemical solutions a;•;y; when there is any possibility of - freezing temperatures. f Historic brick damaged by sandblasting. Cleaning with chemical products that will damage masonry, such as using acid on limestone or marble, or leaving chemicals on masonry surfaces. Applying high pressure water cleaning methods that will damage historic masonry and the mortar joints. https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/masonry01.htm 9/12/2019 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation&Illustrated Guidelines for R... Page 4 of 7 Removing paint that is firmly adhering to, and thus protecting, masonry surfaces. Using methods of removing paint which are destructive to masonry, such as sandblasting, application of caustic solutions, or high pressure waterblasting. Failing to follow manufacturers'product and application instructions when repainting masonry. Using new paint colors that are inappropriate to the historic building and district. Failing to undertake adequate measures to assure the protection of masonry features. Masonry ....Repair MI, recommended Repairing masonry walls and other masonry features by repointing the mortar joints where there is evidence of deterioration such as disintegrating mortar, cracks in mortar joints, loose bricks, damp walls, or damaged plasterwork. Removing deteriorated mortar by - carefully hand-raking the joints to avoid damaging the masonry. , ,, Duplicating old mortar in strength, composition, color, and texture. Duplicating old mortar joints in width t. and in joint profile. Repairing stucco by removing the t �41K damaged material and patchingwith i his �' new stucco that duplicates the old in << strength, composition, color, and r � • fr t r 4 texture. tea r •',- Using mud plaster as a surface '* ' ih , • r , coating over unfired, unstabilized adobe because the mud plaster will ,3r v ' bond to the adobe. - Cutting damaged concrete back to preparation for stucco repair. remove the source of deterioration (often corrosion on metal reinforcement bars).The new patch must be applied carefully so it will bond satisfactorily with, and match,the historic concrete. Repairing masonry features by patching, piecing-in, or consolidating the masonry using recognized preservation methods. Repair may also include the limited replacement in kind--or with compatible substitute material--of those extensively deteriorated or missing parts of masonry features when there are surviving https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/masonry01.htm 9/12/2019 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation&Illustrated Guidelines for R... Page 5 of 7 1 "Ifs prototypes such as terra-cotta brackets or stone balusters. ,. Applying new or non-historic surface treatments 111.,...,,J I �1 such as water-repellent coatings to masonry . ,....,,,."'� - , only after repointing and only if masonry repairs y�<< ' have failed to arrest water penetration problems. Replacement stones tooled to match original. not --- recommended n�--- Removing nondeteriorated mortar from sound joints, then repointing the entire building to achieve a uniform appearance. Using electric saws and hammers rather than hand tools to remove deteriorated mortar from joints prior to --- repointing. - - Repointing with mortar of high portland cement content(unless it is the content of the historic mortar). This can often .. create a bond that is stronger than the . historic material and can cause damage 47 ri , f- i as a result of the differing coefficient of ---'it ( , , �` expansion and the differing porosity of r; _: + � ,.- the material and the mortar. i _ ` Repointing with a synthetic caulking " compound. =- I Using a"scrub"coating technique to eX "`r repoint instead of traditional repointing ------ , 1 ' 1: methods. ' ,-,; Changing the width or joint profile when ¢ 4 • ., repointing. ' ___ Loss of the historic character due to insensitive repointing. Removing sound stucco;or repairing with new stucco that is stronger than the historic material or does not convey — the same visual appearance. Applying cement stucco to unfired, unstabilized adobe. Because the cement ------ stucco will not bond properly, moisture can become entrapped between materials, resulting in accelerated deterioration of the adobe. Patching concrete without removing the source of deterioration. Replacing an entire masonry feature such as a cornice or balustrade when repair of the masonry and limited replacement of deteriorated of missing parts are appropriate. https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/masonry01.htm 9/12/2019 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation&Illustrated Guidelines for R... Page 6 of 7 Using a substitute material for the replacement part that does not convey the visual appearance of the surviving parts of the masonry feature or that is physically or chemically incompatible. Applying waterproof, water repellent, or non-historic coatings such as stucco to masonry as a substitute for repointing and masonry repairs. Coatings are frequently unnecessary, expensive, and may change the appearance of historic masonry as well as accelerate its deterioration. Masonry ....Replace recommended Replacing in kind an entire masonry feature that is too deteriorated to repair--if the overall form and detailing are still evident--using the physical evidence as a model to reproduce the feature. Examples can include large sections of a wall,a cornice,balustrade,column, or stairway. If using the same kind of material is not technically or economically feasible,then a compatible substitute material may be considered. not recommended -----_ Removing a masonry feature that is unrepairable and not replacing it; or replacing it with a new feature that does not convey the same visual appearance. Design for Missing Historic Features The following work is highlighted to indicate that it represents the particularly complex technical or design aspects of rehabilitation projects and should only be considered after the preservation concerns listed above have been addressed. recommended Designing and installing a new masonry feature such as steps or a door pediment when the historic feature is completely missing. It may be an accurate restoration using historical, pictorial,and physical documentation;or be a new design that is compatible with the size,scale, material,and color of the historic building. not recommended — ___._:_ Creating a false historical appearance because the replaced masonry feature is based on insufficient historical, pictorial, and physical documentation. Introducing a new masonry feature that is incompatible in size, scale, material and color. 11 Home I Next I Previous https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/masonry01.htm 9/12/2019 DOCUMENTATION SUPPORTING HERITAGE LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF THE FLETCHER BUILDING 345 THIRD STREET By Robert C. Vogel Preservation Planning Consultant July 31,2000 INTRODUCTION This report documents the historical and architectural significance of the Fletcher Building, 345 Third Street. The report makes the case for the property's eligibility for designation as a Farmington Heritage Landmark pursuant to §2-11-4 of the Farmington City Code. Farmington Heritage Landmarks are the buildings, sites, and districts so designated by the City Council in recognition of their historical, architectural, archeological, and cultural significance. Properties are nominated by Heritage Landmark designation by the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) following a public hearing. Under state law, the Minnesota Historical Society must also review each nomination. Once a property has been designated a Farmington Heritage Landmark, this report becomes part of the official designation and is used to guide planning for the preservation,protection, and use of the historic property. The Heritage Landmark Planning Report is based on the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. For more information about registration standards and guidelines for preparing the report, please refer to the National Park Service publication, How to Complete the National Register Registration Form; and the Historic Preservation chapter of the City of Farmington Comprehensive Plan. ADMINISTRATIVE DATA Name of Property: The historic name of the property nominated for Heritage Landmark designation is the Fletcher Building; it was also commonly known as the Fletcher Block and Fletcher's Hall. It has been assigned number DK-FMC-010 in the state historic property inventory. Location: 345 Third Street. 1 HPC Determination of Eligibility: The Farmington HPC evaluated the Fletcher Building and found that it meets the Heritage Landmark eligibility criteria. A finding of significance was issued by the Commission on April 20, 2000, and this finding was approved by the City Council on May 15,2000. State Historic Preservation Office Review: In accordance with Minn. Stat. §471.193, the Minnesota Historical Society will be sent a copy of this report for review and comment before the nomination is heard by the Farmington City Council. Classification: For preservation planning purposes, the Fletcher Building is considered a historic building. Historic and Current Function/Use: Historically, the building was used for retail space, with apartment dwellings, business, and social space on the second floor. It currently functions as retail space. DESCRIPTION Architectural Classification: In its form and details, the Fletcher Building reflects the mid-nineteenth-century Italianate-influenced vernacular mode in commercial architecture. Boundaries: The boundaries of the heritage landmark are those of the parcel historically associated with the building. Narrative Description: The Fletcher Building is a two-story brick commercial building located on the northeast corner of Third and Oak, in the heart of downtown Farmington's central business district. The building is a vernacular construction with Italianate Style- influenced ornamentation. It measures 43 deep wide by 83 feet deep and has a flat roof. The exterior walls are veneered with cream-colored Chaska brick (now painted buff- yellow) and the Third Street façade features a narrow cornice, hooded second-floor windows,and a metal storefront. It has a flat roof with a low parapet and a simple cornice with a sign panel bearing "Fletcher Building 1877." The ground-floor storefront facing Third Street features large plate glass display windows, metal wall cladding, and a recessed entrance. The influence of the Italianate Style is seen in the window treatment and classical entablature with brackets. The second-story windows are tall and narrow and have segmental arches, and the basement windows along Oak Street are also round- headed. Presently owned by Tom Quam, the building is in good condition and is comparatively little altered from its historic appearance. EVALUATION Applicable Heritage Landmark Criteria: The Fletcher Building is eligible for Heritage Landmark designation because it embodies the distinctive characteristics of the 2 Italianate-influenced vernacular commercial block property type. It is Farmington's oldest extant commercial building and is notable for its well preserved Chaska brick façade. The property is also historically significant for its association with the broad pattern of commercial development in downtown Farmington. Local Historic Context: The property was evaluated within the local historic context,"Downtown Farmington,"as delineated in the 1995 historic context study. Area of Significance: The significance of the property is primarily architectural but it also possesses historical value. Period of Significance: The Fletcher Block attained the significance qualifying it for Heritage Landmark designation when it was constructed in 1877. Narrative Statement of Significance: The Fletcher Building, built in 1877, is a notable example of a late-nineteenth century vernacular commercial block. Although it is fundamentally a vernacular construction, rather than an architect-designed specimen of period architecture, the ornamental aspects of its facade reflect the influence of the Italianate style. Dominating one corner of the downtown's most important business intersection, it is an imposing edifice with a strong overall shape and firm lines. It is the oldest standing brick commercial building in downtown Farmington and was also the first "fire-proof' building built in the town. Contextually, the Fletcher Building also relates to the growth of downtown Farmington as a center of commerce between 1870 and 1945. The building meets the heritage landmark eligibility criteria for its distinctive design and materials and for its association with the development of downtown Farmington. With the Exchange Bank Building, the Fletcher Building anchors the historic Third and Oak commercial intersection and is of pivotal importance to preserving the historic character of the area. Third and Oak emerged as the core of Farmington's commercial district during the 1870's. The downtown streetscape was characterized by a concentration of brick commercial and civic buildings that were designed to conform to the narrow, deep configuration of the platted lots. Commercial buildings constructed between 1877 and 1929 were uniformly rectangular in plan, one or two stories in height, with architectural ornamentation limited to the facades that faced the street, which were built flush with the sidewalk. Fired brick was the most common facing material, usually applied as a veneer, with timber frame or masonry walls providing structural support for the roof and upper floors. The cream-colored Chaska finished brick seen on the Fletcher Building was quite commonly used on Farmington buildings constructed before 1900. This brick was manufactured in brickyards located in the Chaska-Shakopee area, where brick-making was an important industry from the 1860's through the 1890's. The Fletcher Building was built for and owned by Asa Fletcher, a grocer and one of Farmington's pioneer businessmen. Its construction helped signal the end of the economic slump caused by the Panic of 1873. One of the first multi-story buildings in 3 town, it was one of the visual and financial anchor for downtown development and soon became a community landmark. (As shown on the 1910 Sanborn fire insurance map, one of the town's public wells was located in front of the Fletcher Building.)Functionally, the Fletcher Building featured a combination of retail shops, common rooms, offices, and apartments. Throughout most of its history, the ground-floor business space in the building was used for retailing, first as a general store and later for specialty shops. Use of the second floor space was more eclectic. When the Ringling Bros. circus came to town, the property was the venue for the first trapeze performance. The second floor commons room was rented out for many years by the Canby Post No. 47 of the Grand Army of the Republic, the national organization of Civil War veterans who served in the Union army or navy. A characteristically American institution, the G.A.R. was a vital community civic organization. Organized on October 4, 1883, and named in honor of Major General Edward Richard Spring Canby (1817-1873), the Canby Post continued to occupy the second floor of the Fletcher block down through the early twentieth-century, as indicated by the 1917 Sanborn fire insurance map. Later this second-floor space was converted to small offices and apartments. BIBLIOGRAPHY Curtiss-Wedge, Franklyn, editor. History of Dakota and Goodhue Counties, Minnesota, Illustrated. 2 vols. Chicago:H. C. Cooper,Jr. &Co., 1910. Dakota County Tribune. Golden Anniversary Edition 1884-1934. March 9, 1934. Pinkney, B. F. Plat Book of Dakota County, Minnesota. Philadelphia: Union Publishing Co., 1896. Sanborn Map Company. Farmington, Dakota Co., Minnesota. September, 1885, July, 1891, July, 1899, April, 1905, November, 1910, June, 1917, March, 1928, March, 1936. Vogel, Robert C. Farmington Historic Context Document: Final Report of the Historic Context Study 1994-1995. City of Farmington, Heritage Preservation Commission, July, 1995. . Historic Resources Survey of the Downtown Historic Preservation Planning Area, Farmington, Minnesota. June, 1997. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION 1. Map showing the location of the Fletcher Building. 2. Excerpts from Sanborn fire insurance maps (1899, 1905, 1910) showing the Fletcher Building in relation to other downtown properties. 4 3. Façade of the Fletcher Building(camera facing southeast). 4. South elevation of the Fletcher Building(camera facing northwest). 5 ... ........... w g z y .0 a1. o WI s a C ' 0 'i it D O s � M 1 ill •x I • , ) e sn 1 r6 x < t r yry f s k tit cLe 4t moll imi NWo sik '�.- :� qt Om'v ,%r i<�I F ' y) lf �i vc u . !M4 ,4,,r ky, • imiNI 7.11 IS "E F. . ..1,-widiai ,, yilimns... • ' • !111;111 -• etr.....v. s oimilkis 7- Tot :"? 1 4 off' -1 ift-rh-lo oe4i . 1899 I.- MPH. 4voiTilm ,4:IlliiiiiimAin I Q i . srs r ♦ rrr il 111. 1905 . • :z' I: !ga� jA • i Y (gifiZILL� .4.,.=:j ..... ;4 hial it 1111 . ild,ZU P.. !9 WAN lig r, 4• 1 °`" 1ritio61 i ti 4 7 t.; , ralat—{ 1910 2.Excerpts from Sanborn fire insurance maps(1899,1905.1910)showing the Fletcher Building in relation to other downtown properties. I 3.Facade of the Fletcher Building(camera facing south). hh y N i T e kxx: r," 7.:T r 4. South elevation of the Fletcher Building(camera facing northwest).