HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.05.07 Council Packet
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Mission Statement
Through teamwork and cooperation,
the City of Farmington provides quality
services that preserve our proud past and
f9ster a promising future.
.
AGENDA
PRE-CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 5, 2007
6:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1.
CALL TO ORDER
2.
APPROVE AGENDA
3.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
4.
COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA
..
STAFF COMMENTS
a) Fairhill Preliminary Plat - Planning
b) Rose Lake Addition Concept Plan - Planning
6.
ADJOURN
PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
.council workshops are conducted as an informal work session, all discussions shall be considered fact-finding, hypothetical and unofficial critical thinking exercises,
which do not reflect an official public position.
Council work session outcomes should not be construed by the attending public and/or reporting media as the articulation of a formal City policy position. Only
official Council action normally taken at a regularly scheduled Council meeting should be considered as a formal expression of the City's position on any given matter.
.
.
.
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Sa.-
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
~~l~~::~=;bers, ~
\;,Ji
Lee Smick, AICP
City Planner
Fairhill PUD and Preliminary Plat Review
February 5, 2007
ACTION REQUESTED
Staff would like the City Council to provide comments to the developer regarding the Fairhill PUD
and preliminary plat.
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
The Fairhill PUD and Preliminary Plat were submitted to the City on January 12, 2007 for review by
City staff.
Exhibit A shows a phasing plan for the Fairhill project along with building totals for each phase.
Exhibit B shows the preliminary plat with 236 buildable lots and 55 outlots. Exhibit C is a larger
scale of Phase 1 ofthe preliminary plat.
Respectfully submitted,
...,~~
/ .,,: ~
(]zt?e- ---.
Lee Smick, AICP
City Planner
~~
r--
L
~
ii:
-~~'~
-.
, I
i I
,,/
I
-, ~
,/,;/
/'
, 10
I
a.
\ ,t I
/":'l' - lL":~
\' T", r
. I i
"'-. I T ~~~-~ I
~T ~
, <
"-::::L: _ ,j'
.a. I r
\ ill
--~. .,.-....
M
I
a.
\
\
,?
/
,;
"
<
::::L i
c.. ; ,
-..... ..
r
-..~"
/ '
,/
"
,\
\
...... ; /
..' /
! Il
, \ I
-
--.. ~-.... ~I
.S
~
..c:
Cl.o
.
.
I
~ 91
@~
~ p..
~
~ i .3
ll.
Jf DO
.s
b ~
A
z ~;:
6 ~~
;:l l--l Z
~ ~~
en
~
U ~~
~ l--l \.)
0
lIoo ~i
fo-
0
Z
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !! ~ ~ i
M ~ - .
~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~
;;
~
o
N" co ~
~~~~~~~~~~
f f f f f f f f f f
III
~
'"ot:J l!~
~~ ~l
~~ ilJ
<:,)::;;.
Zo'
U ;fi
Il~
l
~
j
I
l
Ul
~
8-
~
s
l
~
~
~
~
Ii
~
.a
.
.
i
~ L
1
I
.n
e
~
= 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ !!
~ i3 m
!
~
~
.:l
~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~
~ -
iil ~ iJ :li '"
R N ~
~ .
E
..
~
,
2
&1 ;;; 1l III 0 0 0 0 0 n
;. - N
'"
".i
;;; m 0 ~ ~ 0 !!
~
'"
il
';/ ill 0 10 1l 'iI ~ ~
il
~ ill i! ~ ill N 'iI ;: ;;; 0 ~
i;l
0
- :;; 11 ill M i'l '" II
-
W ~
CI)
< 0 ~ 0 l'l III
::::L ::
a.
Zl~
~~I
:2
o
u
UJ
<t:
3
<(
o
UJ
~J
~
.
.
.
-.
L
~
d
..
f
'6
i
J
E
)
I
M I ~
II I ~
/5
If. I~.
I-
I!
I
I
I
___J
'N. '':'5 U106t
i~U
~".'!'
.i ~2
.Ill=! ..,
c _
iliif!
"I h"
, 5!
~ ~j
Ii
I.
I~
IF..I~I
I ~,
It!
Iti
I
I
I
1\
jI
I
I
I!
I~
I-
I~
I~
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
--f-
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
-.-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
':i'
!-
tl
..
LJ
'"
1;
3
"
11
ii
:.!.
PI
I
'"
"
~:.
~
-
;
.
.
Ie""
"
...."...
I
I
I
I
J
I
J
, J
~~ I
-+
~:.
/
/
'"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
......
..IO,cs....
r:=
~
;t
o
}
f
..
I ! II -I ~I ,il ;'1:::1 PliN !!llh f !!lnM
I I .:' H ~If 11,;!li. ,lflliI !111!1!1!1~1:!!i
It II' >> U!II'i111 fhn~1 ~lli~i" ~I;MI
.' I.!I"I ~I llmi=~111 ~1I1!11~ II,' l'I,I.IJll111'
, I 1 J It Ib'1111! .1' , la' I~II"" '~II
Ii .11~1 ~'I l,mnlliftl ifiIUIU:I!nrllil. '11!m!;i
I ,. I 11"1 II." II~II ' ,li"1 ,1"',1.
tl , ~h n IIPI "I" '1.lll'J'II.III" Illh,"
1 11fl " 9 IU'I- I, Id I. ' 1:.11" 1:.1
It .11 11 118JI.II:IIIII.118J'III'{IIII. .'1 tlll,1 I'
I ! I I I' I' ,I 'I i91' 1111' 15111
'! II., i! nIti~ifli ~I~W!h:ill~.!!ifiill
!I I nll~ U :ik~lilml!~libl!II~I~~!.i:I}~I:Jlhi:
I ~ I!.I II ! 1111 '1=111;'1 I. Ilfl"l;i IlJII"t
! j f m fl d 1II,!!n!~I!iiillf.Ij!li!lili!!f!~I,.liUi!!f!
i {'Id :,. ,III"",HII:II II'~I=IJ I r."IIIJ
i! dl i! in i i!1f!mi:HbiIUrlid!lhi!ihirhi!UIIi!
61:"1:12
toai!/liill
e.UWdd'tollOO2\a"'\KCIII00i!\'d
I
1~1
I"'
I~
I!,
I~
Ii:!
I
I
I
I..
.r
;}
Ii!
~-~
g!l
!~ .
1;1
J-~i
:l
&;I~
ii
Ii
~.
~~
~~ .r
d:li.IC~
-- ~'l
tlii:,u
Ijria~~
.1-Sl"
>Il: alu
hdiA
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
+-
I ~..
I .'
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
j
t
~ ~I i
J :l.'~
l]i~~~
ilfe~~
.. r-!
jJh~s
ii
1;
1-"-'
d;/
f#l(5iI:;
IGJ
a::;Ic~
i~t1
~''''
.~.!.
ii
~
r:=
o.
:c
]
~.
_'- ---t;;l:. - - - _....J
~:::J--.~~ ---, [J
......"'\ I O::~l! 11--1
~~v""".A\ \ ~_ _ _~jj _ _ -.-J (- -)
'\.~:. \ '<.!l~ EJfea:r-r.s Y I
. -1 _ _ -:;;-., ~
......... -
It
..
i5
!!
~~~ I
-+
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.!!
tiS
011 SONJfJOlJci
~-
.'
~:.
~:.
~:.
ii
~:~
It
~
..
i5
~
i
~
it
Ii
I
.
I' ~oI I: III~ I'
II!II'II! 1I~lli..1 ! ~ t 1 I
l'II!!ln"I'I'II;hjl~ Ifur I I
till I I d'"n I ~'fJI t
I I I I II!'I 1$ I
11',IUI!l. II',IIJIII r~III., 11 I
I "I'lf I" 'II 1$11, I
Ihl;:lh fiij;!iil .Ilitll ill I
'II'I'~' 'I~ ,!,:, "II! I ,
t 11,:1'1" ~I!flf lllrl' H J
IU'lfi'?st:IIUi tl!lll. ~1 ~
11}I.!JlI 1J1I!,HI 1'11'1 .~)I
I" "lh::1 ,.1:111'111 I,~, ~ 1
uU,=dj' I! '1,= H, !'IN t: 'I
il!IU'!}! il!NI:il dIll, II Ir
11Ii/1!;,; II!iN!}i 1IIIIf :!I It
1:,:11111, 1:1;1"i!1 111111 I ;1
ilimUU ililii!Ui i!Uili if: i!i
~
Ii
~
'~~
~~
)~
~
IJ;
ai
n.
o
'.
~
n.
I1I1I il;'Ir. ~.I:I, I ,:.,1
t =1':' t 1.1. I I ~1'III,t Ilil!
Id I' H -I:. J I;" III
1 "1M ? 1'1111 ? "'~III .1,,11
. 1', ,I e' ., I e 1'1' 'I III
IJ;lI' Ilhp 1 J 'II 'I,i
Illlll~ Illti.~! 1.lll'lI:i' IIIlfJ
a."JI11~111 .... '..1 ....
II nfiii 11 iil!iiil fl flill!iJ ! II,:
Ifllfi' . il.. . mlll""'11
IJII'. I 1111 J'm 1111:,1.11 t .).1
I ull=! III IfI I uiliill J tal
df'il~ . di:~lil.; lif'I.':li ,n:;
'iN;1 "I~'!n 'iIM,!; I. Ii
~JII!ei . ~lhli!'lij ~Jil!jI;ij i !I~
If m If I~II~: If II lt~: II~
II!mU III; '~~. :1i~II!i. :hl. it ! It =11
I', '!lIb I'.. 'II' l'U'!lldl' 'Il~i!
, "i ' 1 ,'I '! ",'I I '''I
ilmll!I.i:nH~lm ill di~ll i~lfllt!
, :iilli , ~I~':I t !Jil:. t :iIJ; ,11~i
I jil~h f ~idi!1 f :U~;l1 I HI~ I ~;H
III i ~~i I~~ I' I~
! filii; ! 'l~l!lm!i; !fUI! ! If Ii
1If1~'i' IJ fill;'II~in!U IIWil ! ;nl
!ii};i.d !i ,:i!U~ .!i!h,=Ui !iiJ;.~~ ! !l.j:
-lln 18 ~I l'llil ~lltll~I _1'1111' f,;.I1
I 'l'lli! _ lP'I!>' _ 'lhlJII I 'l'lft' "Itll
'I I I I) If t'rlll If 11,11 'I ,,' I IU
hi t!'lil!ld'I.!:~h Illihl:li. Idi1111! 111='1
1,118 .,. ,. I '1.,1 ,1,., I 1,11,. a hi
,,11"1' I \"~al' 1m dill . ' ,101, I fll
II 'lit ,t II" I' 'ii' I 'I" ' ,"
i!dmu~ UIIH=III; ill :lihU i!n!m~ HI dil
ill I: II ,'II;' 1:1111 t:IIJI
it :d il! I! I iil:! ' i;fd fiUd!
ii ill mu 1 !!;I~ ! ih!l J illll!
n :I!f I~I{II I 'fl!rl1.11 !'I,fli!~ ! ftld~!
H !I~I 11"';1 I '!I~' e f ~II J I lllS
_)11,1'. ',;P.,I ~~ Illlll11~llllthl Ilhhl
I I II ,I. ! I', I! II' !l81'
, I ;:~ t Iii .If IJ~lllJllJIIIEI' Ill'JEli
hI!!!'f !i!i . f!i!~ii; IliUl!! f!ii}b!l
uI5J',. U",I " ~llh'I:I::ltll'll ~IIIII'I'
. ' . 'I I I.' I' I" '
Ibldl I;'f~. 1,1~;;i Illlled h,II'Jef!
CI'I] I 'III{ , It,~, "1'1111 'IIIIJI
Itllll Wlli,111 '!ill lllUl:lt 1':..1
:1:'llf ~II,. .~II :"!i=:i IklJt ,+~JIII
i1llli:1 ~fl~l e li1!tl sfl' IJld!,l! J:III~!I.
, I hi Ill, I h ,II" II I I h ,II I h lull
I J:I , ill; I' !!iI'M I' JIMI f ., ,illll:
!f:lti Ij1d! II 11'~~~i II 1Jf'~I!1 . ~I !lfn!;
Imil nilil !l ~:I;~!!l i:;i!iii ~ UMi:
iUtf II u~.I! !Jl ~dlliid !I! :i!'fidi !I UifUtl
III' 'tllfl J ,II. I. I ,II 1'1 11 111,'11'
1)11'1 ~I'I'~I 11~I:i:l! I. I:,imll Iltll'IJ'
,l;~ -II~I I 11'1:1'" 'INII"I 'I ,1M =
Illi., I 1:1 9 ff. 1111d~ If .IIII~I i. Ii!!. ml
I'I,!I I!I '~J'IUII ,~ t'] II .. I,I!] I'
dUll hi! J 11~i{lil! 111!i:il!'! IInItJ!!}
i~iiU ~I~llf !n'I:JI~llli: !, :11:J!II,i:!} !Pilhin
111'1 I~. i:1 I 't i: I 'Iii il 111;11'
J:lii,:: II!!! I mlll~H!1 mll'!,f!b!1 illmH'~i!
HI' .1: el,. IHI 111"I'f n'l I "I'f" J 1'1 . 1~
d,l_it INn l:la1luIJ Illall=IJ 1 I"hl;fal
iHmUI hl!!:! iilli!Ulfif niill!ilIiI! iiJIii:!~!
q
I t
, )
: r
H
I I
!q
I: !
III
'i '
I, l
I J I
ti,'
II I
iN II
I ,I .
~
Jf
~ 1:1
I ijl.
I iiI;
~. f!ij
II. Iii.
h,1
I' Iii!!
"III
1111 II
I,Jil1
fl!;,11
~JI,I::
h;!!11
11..,,1
Ilq
l'i.JlII
111:Itl:"
, . t:u
_b
~
~
~s
t:~
gt:l.t
~
8
IlIl
~
f-o.
~
!
I
III
J
J
II
j
"ottqi,i
~~; 1
~~ il.
Z:u 'fl
!! II
&
~
~
1--4
~
~
...
~
o
~
Ii
1...
ill II
I), ·
.. J
..,
t.i'.i ~!.I
'I'
I t
III J J
~II
~
8
u.J
<(
~
o
u.J
~I
-
.-J
<
~
o
II)
'"
z
z
~
z
o
~
u
z
::t
'"
<
...
I
r
(S
\U
-~
-I
L
~
t
1
,;
g
~
~
8
~
~
~
.
.
fjO"rj'''-''''
~~~,..~".o'
, ,'~
~
00'""'- ...,
..'1'1 #
~'Il"
~~cP' ," \.)~..'>
Ii
.
;i
~
~
~
C
-E
[E
~
~
\
Co"lot
Il:,
~~
><
...,
..Q'
1 \ 0 tl
~ 'j. c ~ I' f~~
.lr ...,-...
~.f~\1>- .. '1'100\
Ill,
i'
;,po.'>' ,,'
~i>P
0;
;;
\
"-
'16)9'S
~ 1,1.00\
'"
Iii
J
.l!
I
'D~
Cf:
roz
-::J
~:;
cu:;
z8
I!
L,
ill ~I
~l]' I
,J ,
,"I !
Iii f ;1
111 ,
I I i
111 i J
~II
:2:
o
u
UJ
<(
~
o
UJ
~J
-
~
II
~
!! ~
!IJ
l~
iff
I~
l
~
>
~i
ii
~5
...
"'w
~~
~I!!
DC
~..
alii
;!
g:. .r
.~"~J
.;'l:!7~
-<II Nil
I "'I. .
! ~ ~;~;;~
~~l-;;~
I!ll!! ____
----------
------------
- - - ~ - - - - - '-- - - - - - 'Till
---
@~
IN
.1;:Q
. I
~g
~I
z-
~ ~
~...
i5~
s .
. <
...2
2
i~!i
G~d
~ ~.g II
Oligo"
"OG:.S: ~
litl'i..
.~H~
tld
~a__
-blJ!
ilH~
('3.\'0'
31'o'CJ'l3JdIHO)
~
:i
~t
Il ~1! i
1!~1~!
ca~~,!. ~
'!1"N':a
. . :\i-.li
1 1~!~
ud~~
~
'ON
I
3 .or ,80000 N
A 'o'MHCH lNlW. 3l'o'lS
~~
B
~
J
i
r
~
i
~
~
1--1
::c
~
1--1
~
...
~
,
~
IJ
'1
<
!-o
o
V)
'"
Z
Z
~
Z
o
l-
I)
Z
:::(
""
<
u..
-
~~
1-
-I
~~
r--
I
t~ ~~
r~~.;:j
i... ~.
)... CD I
ea Ii
l .::
~;g~
~~ ~j
~N~
~ B~ I ...
~h i ~~ i i
i~i! ~ I ~il ~ ~ .
lin !~:~d I~I~!I ~ ~ 8 f
hl! Ilh~ lll~ I ~ I II
I:hi 11!!1!! 11I11! · t I !
...r - - - - - '- - - - - - - - - ~ - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~.-A ~ ~
- --- H_ · "'''"''. ~y ......:l ~
- -~ ~ i fV · ~ .~ - &.a ~~ {I ~i
i ~~
~ ii
r '~
~I~I--' ~
.\~, .-.U -i -! lIi 12! "'io/F' /II, ~"~, ~
..\\, ~ '//T'StlBp! ' ~ i'
i; }' o.~ K ,- .; ;/f, - ";'" ~ '-&J... Ii \,~: ~
Bf ~\\.~' \f' 'j "51/1~!~..i ' .. ~~~<fJ# ! .\ ~~
~\~~I__~~ ',"~ ..'! ,~~~', ~ . ;\~ H ,.;j~_~_,
~. ~ ! .. We> ~ ~ -' '~) I uu.
~~,~i~lI/~ ;' 0; -' '~,-",~ _%-~-ii~. ~'~.
-0.'~?r}~'f!'"' , . /#~ .,; _~~~' ,~, .;\j~
~ I~t .~~;~ ~
"! ~=:::c:-:: - ., (~ \ ; '::4'_, "! .. ,,' ..~, \~
r;r = ~~ ~.H<~;, ~ ' '"
'I' ~ "!\ ~~).. ..i il~\\
,; 1\ ___ ~,n~:\'l..-~~~ "'" ,'~
~ ~.j ~~~-~ ~oj ! '~
.! ~-:-~ ~. '":1..~ \ l"'YI' ~i .' ~
"i"5 . :::::.'- ~~\' -i ~;? ~ ~'~~ ~ ~~ ~
~ ' ~ "5~ ! II ~ \ \ __ , \
"i ~~-i JI'2 ,:;..11 ... ~\ -! " -i " . ",'
,~ 1jO. L:,:; -I ~ _' .. "
'1.J: ~ ~ :3J.l. ~A . IF, . ' ~
llOiil~ \--- '~IT ii' · ..;~ ~~..., ~ to -. \ '"- ii \"i !\
- oj ~. .~~~~~ - .,~~ \~(\\;1 ~ ,'~~ .~"i ~\"i -5 _ ~ 5 -~ ll~ .1
'\ ~ 9 ~-.\~ .' ," ,\ [I CD ~ - ~ ,I.
tL \ \ F:QL - .' 6~\-=i1 - ..s · T1~\~\ o;i "5 1.5rdrd -i ~;11-i. -; . ~ J ~ II 1/1
"i.i ~~ '<Ir~t It"'.\"' U\" ~ \ ~~ ii'
" ~~ .,' -~'~ _~_I-~ 1 ," -~-r-~r ~~! j
jl ~"! ~~.v.....~ iJ" ;- .j.. -i ~oi ,,0; ~'i "j .;,~.; ~.i ~.; ilt! il
-' .~' ~:.i\"~ ;.'~ ~~ !UIII
\\.' /~.-A~"! ! \\\ ~
, . :\ ~"S \..:t '""'~........ i),' _, ~ IH,
~ ~"'~~1'9r .u jl '..-
~ ~"i~..jJ -L~ ~~,/ ~ _' ,,'l~o' ::::E
~'WN~~~C Jd.~ ~~ 8
"! ' i;;; -i 'v l' ~ \ 0 ~p.C'f"C u.J
c. ~ . 'II <(
It'" ~ 0""
-: ~ ~ ...,,-f
~ ~.,' 'II gt.1' ~
...~o ~~ 0
~~ u.J
.,,0. ,.~.,
cj!P""- ",
ii
h1j ~I~
.~ I-A
1! l!----.t
J
~. . .-- I
i!
Iii III
J 1i
'o~ ~llil
~~ i J
~I !il
II II
~
I
~
\\1
8,
it
"
s
f
...
.a
!
I
)
i
~
rt"'"
..oil" .0'
.~;..!l'o
,.
.--
ii
~J
.LS~ WII ':1'''z." 9DOZIlllOl OMJrWdd"JE0l100z,a..\,tOllOO2\<"
..J
L
.
.
.
Sb
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Mayor, Council Members. 0 V
City Administrator ()' ~
Lee Smick, AICP
City Planner
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Concept Plan - Rose Lake (Winkler Property)
DATE:
February 5, 2007
ACTION REQUESTED
The City Council has requested to be more involved with developments at the concept plan stage of
the development process. Therefore, staff would like the City Council to provide comments to the
developer regarding the Rose Lake concept plan, as described below.
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
Bart Winkler has submitted the attached concept plan for review by staff, the Planning Commission
and the City Council. The property is generally located east of the East Farmington Development
and south of 213 th Street. The subject property consists of approximately 70 acres of land owned by
Mr. Winkler. The concept plan shows a total of 122 single-family lots and four outlots. The outlots
will be utilized as follows:
Outlot A - future parkland
Outlot B - stormwater facility
Outlot C - wetland area
Outlot D - wetland mitigation area and future townhome development
Lots
The lot sizes and widths that are proposed with this concept are consistent with the comprehensive
plan amendment and zoning (Low/Medium Density and R-2, respectively) that was established for
this property by the City Council on August 21, 2006. The minimum lot sizes are proposed at 6,000
square feet with a minimum lot width of 60 feet.
Transportation
Both 213th Street (County Road 72) and Spruce Street are shown to be extended to the east to provide
access to this site. Both of these extensions will require crossing over the Prairie Waterway. Staff
does have some concerns regarding the amount of lots accessing off of the future 213th Street
extension. It has been the practice of the City to minimize the amount of direct lot accesses off of
collector streets, of which 213th is classified. Staff has provided the concept to the City's traffic
engineer and is waiting on a response. In addition, half of the right-of-way to be dedicated for the
213th street extension lies within the Devney parcel adjacent to the north. This would require the
applicant to purchase land or acquire an easement from the Devney's in order to construct the road as
shown.
Wetlands
The property contains portions of three delineated wetlands. The developer will need to apply for a
wetland alteration permit as the proposed project will impact these wetlands.
Sidewalk. Park. and Trail
Five foot wide sidewalks are proposed on the west side of Street B, south side of Street A, east side
of Street D. As previously mentioned, park land is proposed to be dedicated (Outlot A) in the
northeast portion of the site. The Parks and Recreation Commission will review this concept plan on
February 14,2007.
Planning Commission
The Planning Commission will review this concept plan at its February 13, 2007 meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Lee Smick, AICP
City Planner
Cc: Bart Winkler
""."""""""''''., jI) D
Ul9-Ql511(~):XYJ ttQ9-o&a(ZQI)=BltId
L\'m "'~ 'oZllUlS1~"llj'1l~'''ocm
SllOA3A~ns / S~33Nr.lN3 / S~3NNVld fiIj..
'3UI 'II!H 'H sawer \JII
~
.
~
,;
~
..
!
~
I ~!
l;
'0:
.-
,.
~~
:1
:
..:~
it
:5:
'3';
~i_
:s:i
~]'
~~
'::lNI 'J.N:!IJ'ldO'l~:m A1
""
NV'Id J.d:il::lNO::l
VJ.OS3HNrl 1KlJ.~NIl'nIVJ
IDIV'l :!ISOH
,.
al :!i
~ ~ ~~
'" ~
c
If ':135 'o/I:>>! )H~JO)N('llSYr'_.
3 90 so.ooN oy'6L\7\ ..
r--"'__... 3nN3^'<f 3NA'<f:)SI8
~ ~
~
. ~
~ ~ g~ ~
! ~ ~~ B
Vi
I,
1\ ,
I I
~:
------~~ I
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ \ ,\ _ _ ,"".I'>-HU"'.... i \ \ 1 \ \
t:.'_ O~~ 8';'O;S ,\':':~;:O:: - - - -r- - - ~ - - - I
--....... ::L1_1_ -. -1-1- - - - - - - - - - _U _JL
"'" I I I ":'=1=::C!~S H..:..~~=.r::..:..;:!;;C_1
\~? I I I rli'-I-I-'i i'l-I'lr~' -r-
12~ il-L ~ J~~I -1,-J- ~UI-\ I I )-l f;~'
:;~ I I I L ~ ~': 1- ~ ~ -i ~~ I i;---t-"- ~-"1- I ~:~ I
I ~~ f-11-11-1-LI-1e,j ~ l"'l T'~ gL J g~ I
() I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I (,') I
<;~~
bm
-'., '
t- "'15~
::J ~.'
0...
Cl
f-
o
-'
f-
::J
o
"
j
~ g~
d~
~ ~~
h!
~H
'< 1';(
I
I N
I
I '" 0 ';::
V
I Ol
I V '" ~
.1 '" !Xl ~
~I '"
~I <.0 ..... 0
:1 '" N ,"
<.0 ~
-I ..... '" N ii .
~I ., ~
!Xl '" N .- ll) -
~, '" N !
" f-
V ::ll"') 0 ,
!I Ol '" t- -' ~
f- \ '\.,
~ Cl ::J
~ '" V Iii 0
N'" N '~.\ \ \
N f-I '"
::: '" tJl N t:1 i ~
., ~
~ ;;; ~\ <.0 -/' U
N ~
<1: f-
I '....,... 0
~ 0 ..... -'
:......... '" I N f-
i '" '-:~ '-- ::J
;:t: Ol !Xl 0
N N ~'""~ ~ '''...
( " I \. \
'12 <Xl I Ol ......
" N N 0 \.
( \ 0 Ol
~ ..... - \
'''-'-, N I '" ,-
'" 1 : ';:: <.0 I ;;; In \
I N
_............... 1 \ ~ '" I N \
\ N \ '"
I '" \
"--J..: ~ V
N '"
I' V
I '"
I <.0 ..... !Xl
'" '" '" '"
I '"
1
I
I
~ ~ i;l
h 0
g~
~
~.... .
~~ ~U
g~ 9 g:
i~;~~
~ l5 I i';(
.- . N I"")
'''.
V '"
~ ~ :! ~
<.0 .....
...-
z
f'\
-
::~
.
..
M~
@
I>t.\W I'M 'UTtt/\ 3'Wd't ~ JU1S 'lDl:llS Hi.ttl .lS3/l oarL
"::lNI 'J.N:!IJ'ldO'l:ilA:ilG lI:rDINIJI.
""
SNOLLl<INO::l flNIJ.SIX:il
tt.ll-utlnrd:WJ 1f!1:-lIt(n!:l'JIIlIW
1tKS..... 'I.-.s........tttm
~ :nJ ttOI~""
HRll,........'OCIIPlS'D.....3.1Kr
SllOA3A~ns / S~33Nr.lN3 / S~3NNVld
'3UI 'II!H "H sawer
z
~i Q
~;~ ~
~ ~~ ~~
B" ~,
::I O;:::I;-J
! ~~ ~~
a B! a~
T
j 1 j
~
(1
-
c8
~"
.
.
~2
3
~
a; ~~~
~:i~: ~u
.~ ~~a 3~
~~ l;~ 0
~u~~ ~;
H~~H U
1II11lF lAlIIlIl w. v,
BB&BBB BB
I
" '1 ;
1
.,.",-.....
.Td~~~..""
...I'....MfI...........
~HtO'oI,._''''''
_"""il'IIl__
A................A"'..._
-,..........
....~l"'MtMl...A~1
Y.10S3NNlr1 'NOUJNll'ltIV.:I
:!DIV'l :!ISOH
~~"":"''''':
gun
I ~O~"I'_
l:UU
"
~ ~ii~i
~ g
m ~ii~i
~ ~
i hi~i
:i1 "
u IqlOG:!lJ!
~ ~nu
~ I.,GG"
~ ~uu
;1
..
!fD~~1"-:
~uu
~O:~O:~
~UUi
m:!;!j~~
~NNNN
190..0..0.. a..
;;:
\~
;1
..
"
Q) """"
,,'.,"\..
::::::::~~.~...
:::::::::::::::~'~~".-,...
I . I . I 'I 'I . I" I ~,l "
.:..:..:,.:,.;,.:,,:"1,:'
-'-'<~A<t:: $\
~'...
; .
z ~ ~
. > .
p~
~h
." "
.~~
B B B
.
..
...-{I~j
. f0:@::nt:~:\
,.;fl'I'I'I'I'I'I,.i",
\;:"""'1"1""""'1'\ .
~.:~.~ I ::1:: I ~;~:.,~ .
1--'
I I
~,._ _l,
I
I
I..
I
I I I i
I I I I
rL _I_(.L-;
-I ,--l
I L__J
.1,- -,-L I
~ w~ ~
H ~~ in
~ O? ~
ci
~~ z l!;
"Ill ,,~ N
u~
~8 I!jO ~
~N '"
UN ~
..
;
"
t
ii-,
"
~
(I .. r-, T-
I I I I I i I
~ -- ~ ~ J ~-ill:ll,1
I--~}--,-,-C---I '
I I
~--\
! I~-~-
i I~--i-
ntl-lIttttt):rtJ tl'11-utU'trt):)OW ~ -.anr-......Il ""1II1lI7Tr.a IoUlOlO Nn 'UT1Y^ 31dcIV rolO lUllS '.1111:11.5 H.Lltl .1S:' oarl. d
,"'"..... .....'JI.,"..rm '::lNI 'J.N:mdO'l~:ila H:il'DlNUI. ~ '" Z ~
~:XVltMI-tlll(ZW:JlOW ~~ Z D
lag;llII~"'I_'lt"ll3"ClIKr -- l<l"1llllJll5'l) '1)1;1111 YO, ~~ 0 ~ ti~ ~
SllOA3A~ns / S~33Nr.lN3 / S~3NNVld ..__...toIS NV'Id flNI<mlfl 1Vn.Ld:il::lNO::l "'!;: In ~ !oj!!
"'11'_"'_-""" ",Ii O~ ~ ~
'3UI 'II!H 'H sawer _....'...n~,. V.10S3NNW1 'NO.10NlftWJ '" :;1N ~
.....1"'"_..............1... ~
..._.._.loI__ :!DIV'l :!ISOH c ~ ~
"'~JJ>_""""
"-Id "'1\ 1.... '..... ~""....
'-..,
..'
z:
r,
-
.8
~"
..
~~ -
~
'.
Illl,
tJ
D.
N
~ ~2~~ ~
: ~ · ~ ~ ~ ~ 2._
~ l!i ~ 2 ~ ~.
n ~n ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~;
B~i~lf I;
I( elm nn
t iliiiJ CJu
.-',
~ ~
. i ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ; f
~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ..
; i ~ ~ . ~~
~ g . 5--
~ . ~.
. .~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f
"-..
a a ~~
o lI][J 0 l j t
':. ~'.\: ! .:.,
I;.' ,..-l'"
I 1
I
1
I
I
I, ,
1'.'
1
1
1
I
,
:':;.
i'
,',
,',
.\
-:'1
1-'-1--1-'--' J
i I I I i I
~ I, 1 i ..L-<
I r-- l' I
r 1 r'--l
I J L__J
I ,L,_ _,J., Ii
I'ldll): 0 LOO ~o l - No(J O~6 0
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Mission Statement
Through teamwork and cooperation,
the City of Farmington provides quality
services that preserve our proud past and
foster a promising future.
AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 5, 2007
7:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3, ROLL CALL
4. APPROVEAGENDA
5, ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS
a) Introduce New Employee - Engineering
b) Commendations - Police Chief
c) American Red Cross Proclamation
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments)
7. CONSENT AGENDA
a) Approve Council Minutes (1/16/07 Regular) (1/23/07 Special)
b) Approve Cigarette License Restwell Motel - Administration
c) Approve 3.2 Beer License - Administration
d) School and Conference - Administration
e) School and Conference - Police Department
j) Left Blank Intentionally
g) Amend Fee Ordinance - Parks and Recreation
h) Appointment Recommendation Fire Department - Human Resources
i) Appointment Recommendation Fire Department - Human Resources
j) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation - Police Department
k) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation - Administration
1) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation Rambling River Center - Parks and
Recreation
m) 2006 Heritage Preservation Commission Annual Report - Administration
n) December 2006 Financial Report - Finance
0) Approve Pipeline Crossing Agreement - 195th street Project - Engineering
p) Approve Change Order 2006 Mill and Overlay Project - Engineering
q) Approve Change Order 20gth Street Project - Engineering
r) Authorize Update of City's Comprehensive Utility Plans - Planning
Action Taken
Introduced
Acknowledged
Proclaimed
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Information Received
Approved
Approved
Approved
R20-07
R21-07
R22-07
Information Received
Information Received
Approved
Approved
Approved
Authorized
s) Approve Bills
t) Approve Scope of Services - NPDES Non-Degradation Study - Engineering
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Approve Therapeutic Massage License - Administration
9. AWARDOFCONTRACT
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) 2007 Projects Discussion - Engineering
b) TH3 Roundabout Project Update - Engineering
c) Rose Lake Concept Plan - Planning
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
12. NEW BUSINESS
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
14. ADJOURN
Approved
Approved
Approved
Information Received
Information Received
Information Received
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Mission Statement
Through teamwork and cooperation,
the City of Farmington provides quality
services that preserve our proud past and
foster a promisingfuture.
AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 5,2007
7:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P,M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVE AGENDA
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS
a) Introduce New Employee - Engineering
b) Commendations - Police Chief
c) American Red Cross Proclamation
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments)
7. CONSENT AGENDA
a) Approve Council Minutes (1116/07 Regular) (1123/07 Special)
b) Approve Cigarette License Restwell Motel - Administration
c) Approve 3.2 Beer License - Administration
d) School and Conference - Administration
e) School and Conference - Police Department
f) Left Blank Intentionally
g) Amend Fee Ordinance - Parks and Recreation
h) Appointment Recommendation Fire Department - Human Resources
i) Appointment Recommendation Fire Department - Human Resources
j) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation - Police Department
k) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation - Administration
I) Adopt Resolution - Accept Donation Rambling River Center - Parks and
Recreation
m) 2006 Heritage Preservation Commission Annual Report - Administration
n) December 2006 Financial Report - Finance
0) Approve Pipeline Crossing Agreement - 195th Street Proj ect - Engineering
p) Approve Change Order 2006 Mill and Overlay Project - Engineering
q) Approve Change Order 20gth Street Project - Engineering
r) Authorize Update of City's Comprehensive Utility Plans - Planning
Action Taken
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
s) Approve Bills
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Approve Therapeutic Massage License - Administration
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) Approve Scope of Services - NPDES Non-Degradation Study - Engineering
b) 2007 Projects Discussion - Engineering
c) TH3 Roundabout Project Update - Engineering
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
12. NEW BUSINESS
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
14. ADJOURN
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
5~
2007 THE YEAR TO GET READYl
Whereas, a survey conducted by the American Red Cross in 2006 found that the majority
of Americans have not taken even the basic steps needed to prepare for a disaster or an
emergency situation; and,
Whereas, disaster can strike quickly and without warning and being prepared is crucial to
saving lives at home, in school, at work and in the community; and,
Whereas, the best way to be prepared for a house fire, tornado, or other disaster is for
individuals and families to have an emergency plan; and,
Whereas, a disaster kit with enough supplies for each family member for three days can
help your family in a winter storm, pandemic flu, or other disaster when access to
supplies might become limited; and,
Whereas, children and adults trained in First Aid and CPR save lives and make our
communities safer; and,
Whereas, the Twin Cities Area Chapter of the American Red Cross through its
Community Challenge has offered to assist our community to prevent, prepare for and
respond to emergencies.
Now Therefore, I, Kevan Soderberg, Mayor of the City of Farmington, do hereby
proclaim 2007 the Year to Get Ready and call upon local residents to Get a Plan, Get a
Kit, and Get Involved to help save lives in our community.
Kevan Soderberg, Mayor
7a...
COUNCIL MINUTES
PRE-MEETING
J~UARY16,2007
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 6:30 p.m.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Also Present:
Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson
None
Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator;
Robin Roland, Finance Director; Brian Lindquist, Police Chief;
Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director
of Public Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative
Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director;
Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant
2. APPROVE AGENDA
MOTION by McKnight, second by Pritzlaffto approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
3, CITIZEN COMMENTS
4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF AGENDA
Councilmember McKnight asked who is attending the school and conference for
Economic Development and Finance. City Administrator Herlofsky noted it is Tina
Hansmeier and Robin Roland. Councilmember McKnight then asked about the fee
increase for the 2007 Seal Coat Project. City Engineer Mann replied it is due to the cost
of oil.
City Administrator Herlofsky administered the Oath of Office to Councilmember
Fogarty.
Councilmember Fogarty pulled the Council Minutes to abstain from voting.
Councilmember Wilson mentioned he would also be interested in attending the economic
development/finance conference. City Administrator Herlofsky noted staffwill also be
bringing back materials to share with everyone.
Councilmember Pritzlaff pulled the Council Minutes for comment. He commented the
list of businesses was great and noticed the Subway on Pilot Knob was not listed.
Regarding the building permit report he was looking for a comparison of the dollar
amount compared to what was budgeted. This will be provided at the next meeting.
Regarding the bill for Aslakson's Blacktopping, he felt this was a late payment as the
project is substantially complete and any remaining funds should be held for punchlist
items. City Engineer Mann replied staff double checked the contractor's numbers and
Council Minutes (Pre-Meeting)
January 16, 2007
Page 2
reduced the amount the contractor requested. Staff is retaining funds for punchlist items.
Councilmember Pritzlaff asked for the dollar amount that is being retained. Regarding
the curbside clean-up day agreement, Councilmember Pritzlaff questioned the charge for
appliances and electronics. Staff explained it is the City that will be paying the fee to
Certified Recycling, not the residents.
5. STAFF COMMENTS
City Administrator Herlofsky requested Council give some thought to topics they want to
discuss at workshops and a date for a retreat.
Finance Director Roland added a supplemental item to accept a bid for the coolers from
the liquor store.
Administrative Services Director Shadick informed Council she has received calls from a
couple residents commenting on the landmark designation of the home at 409 Spruce
Street. Residents were concerned with the designation as the reconstruction is still in
progress. The designation is based on the shape and style of the house. The
reconstruction work does not interfere with the reason for the landmark designation.
6. ADJOURN
MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to adjourn at 6:48 p.m. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
~JYl~
~hia Muller
Executive Assistant
COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR
JANUARY 16, 2007
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Soderberg at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Soderberg led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Also Present:
Audience:
Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson
None
Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator;
Robin Roland, Finance Director; Brian Lindquist, Police Chief;
Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director
of Public Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative
Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director;
Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant
Gary Pipho, Bryce Olson, Douglas Bonar, David Marsh, Randy
Oswald, J oel West, Mike Pierce, Lee Kindem, Renee Auge, Beve
Preece '
4. APPROVE AGENDA
Councilmember Fogarty pulled the Council Minutes to abstain from voting. Finance
Director Roland added a supplemental item 7s) Award Cooler Bids.
MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Fogarty to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a) Introduce Promoted Employee - Police
Police Chief Lindquist introduced Officer Gary Rutherford who was promoted to
Sergeant.
b) Introduce Promoted Employee - Administration
Administrative Services Director Shadick introduced Danielle Cahlander who was
promoted to full-time Communications Specialist.
c) City Hall Presentation - Wold Architects
Mr. John McNamara, Wold Architects, presented the design development of the
new City Hall for approval. The project budget is $9,143,000. An alternate will
be included in the bids for finishing the expansion space. MOTION by Fogarty,
second by Wilson to approve the design development submittal. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED.
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16,2007
Page 2
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS
Mr. Mike Pierce, 5137 203rd Street W, congratulated Council on the new City Hall. Most
taxpayers feel this is good and it will help staff support the City. Regarding the new
sports facility proposal by the school district, he was puzzled by recent negative
comments made by certain members and City staff. He will render these comments as
made by individuals and not City employees. The City has had many opportunities to
construct and support additional sports facilities. Council received a recommendation to
go forward with an initial phase of construction of athletic fields and a building. The
recommendation was tabled citing the City's financial inability to bond the project as it
related to current construction projects. The City is charging the school district for
building permits related to the new high school project. Those permits are based upon
square footage and use, so in relation to the facilities the school is proposing, the City
would receive an additional large permit fee for those as well. Given the current cautious
climate the City has relating to building permits and future budget goals, Mr. Pierce
stated it was hard for him to understand why the City would not be supportive of a
measure which would lead to a 6-7 figure permit fee. The proposal is for ISD 192 to
build the structures now. This will cost the taxpayers approximately $50/household/year.
That same project financed by the City would cost the taxpayers $240/household/year.
He hears the term fiscal responsibility used in Council and School Board meetings. The
only way to be responsible is to allow the voters to make the most economic choice for
themselves. One person at. the last School Board meeting commented the City already
has a Parks and Rec department and this is in their realm and it is the responsibility ofthe
City rather than the school district to provide these facilities. As a taxpayer he fully
agrees with that statement. Ifthe City is responsible for that, he wanted to know where
the additional baseball, softball and soccer fields and swimming and hockey facilities are
to support the youth and encourage the residents to spend their income in this
community. He hoped no one begrudged the school district the opportunity to provide
the facilities. Most residents do not care whether the City or the school district builds it.
They want to make the best economic choice and see it through. Many on the Council
and staff are supportive ofthis idea. He encouraged those who are supportive to begin
voicing their opinions on the subject. He does not want the as yet uninformed residents
to get the impression everyone is wholly against this proposal. There are many details to
be worked out, but the beneficiaries of the construction will be all of us and more
importantly the future taxpayers that will be drawn to the community.
Mr. David Marsh, 204 1 st Street, stated due to some confusion he was in attendance at the
last meeting. He and local residents have petitioned to have the 2020 Comp Plan
changed in their area. They have been assessed a fee of $650. They requested to have
the fee waived. He received a letter stating Council upheld the fee. He was asking why
when he has thousands of dollars tied up in this already. He also asked Council to amend
the fee so he can move forward. Mayor Soderberg stated he can move forward with what
he would like to do. The action at the last meeting was "therefore action" and there was
no motion. The fees are set at the beginning of the year. Mr. Marsh clarified that is the
final action, that the fee will stand and they are not guaranteed whether the request for the
comp plan will be approved. Mayor Soderberg stated the fee will stand. The zoning and
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16,2007
Page 3
comp plan for that area were changed a few years ago. At that time there was
opportunity for residents to comment. Mayor Soderberg feels the zoning in that area is
correct. Mr. Marsh stated natural progression does not stop three houses short ofthe park
and the river. Natural progression would have taken it all the way to the bridge and that
was not done. The residents are stuck with worthless property they cannot sell
residentially or commercially. They had a meeting with the Planning division and one
resident said they did not care one way or the other and that he would not sell
commercially. That holds the plan up for everyone else to sell because one resident is not
willing. He has a house he cannot sell residentially because he has to disclose it is in a
commercial zone. He cannot make any structural changes, all he can do is maintain it.
The property value has gone down because he is unable to do what he wants to his house.
A permit fee to allow him to remodel his home would be more than $650. He lost money
on the CUP and to have it surveyed. Mr. Marsh asked where that leaves him and what
are his alternatives? Mayor Soderberg stated he can submit the application and go
through the process, but the fee would be applied. There is no guarantee as to the
outcome. Mayor Soderberg stated he favors leaving the zoning as is. Mr. Marsh asked
the rest ofthe Council for their opinions. Councilmember Fogarty stated she was not at
the last meeting and would need more information. The remaining Councilmembers
were comfortable with leaving the zoning as is.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to approve the Consent Agenda as follows:
b) Approved Appointments to Boards and Commissions - Administration
c) Received Information Comprehensive List of Businesses - Economic
Development
d) Adopted ORDINANCE 007-568 Approving Text Amendment - Planning
e) Received Information 4th Quarter Building Report - Building Inspections
f) Received Information 2006 Stormwater Survey Results - Engineering
g) Approved School and Conference - Finance/Economic Development
h) Approved School and Conference - Fire Department
i) Approved School and Conference - Fire Department
j) Received Information School and Conference - Human Resources
k) Adopted RESOLUTION RS-07 Accepting Donation - Parks and Recreation
1) Adopted RESOLUTION R6-07 Accepting Donation - Parks and Recreation
m) Received Information Park Signage Purchase - Parks and Recreation
n) Adopted RESOLUTION R7-07 Approving Gambling Event Permit -
Administration
0) Adopted RESOLUTION R8-07 Approving 2007 Joint Powers Agreement for
Street Contracting Services - Engineering
p) Approved Curbside Cleanup Day Agreement - Engineering
q) Adopted RESOLUTION R9-07 Accepting Donation - Parks and Recreation
r) Approved Bills
s ) Awarded Cooler Bids - Economic Development
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16, 2007
Page 4
a) MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to approve Council Minutes (1/2/07
Regular). Voting for: Soderberg, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson. Abstain: Fogarty.
MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to approve Council
Minutes (12/28/06 Special). Voting for: Soderberg, McKnight, Pritzlaff, Wilson.
Abstain: Fogarty. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Wilson to
approve Council Minutes (1/8/07 Special). Councilmember Pritzlaffnoted this was a
workshop with Engineering. He read a statement he made at the meeting regarding
Council not having rating sheets for the mill and overlay project when the project was
first brought to them. The second set of ratings showed all but one of the streets was
significantly worse than the first ratings. Using the second set of ratings it should have
been a full reconstruct so in the end we did the wrong project. Councilmember Pritzlaff
stated that is his personal feeling based on the information from the pavement
management rating sheets. There were two different sets and the numbers showed what
they were. He left the meeting at 6:53 p.m. and after that the Mayor made a comment
stating to look at two different documents from two different sheets and say we did the
wrong project is foolishness. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked the Mayor what he meant
and it was in direct conflict of his opinion on these two documents. Mayor Soderberg
stated the pavement management program is an internal engineering tool. Mayor
Soderberg stated he is not an engineer and does not pretend to understand what those
documents reflect without actually talking to engineering. For Council to say we can
take two sheets of paper and make a determination based on that is foolishness if you do
not understand how pavement management works and you do not understand those
internal engineering tools. It was not meant to be a personal affront. Mayor Soderberg
stated he understood Councilmember Pritzlaffwanted to leave to attend the School Board
meeting which is your right, but had you stayed we could have gotten some of those
issues resolved which Councilmember Pritzlaffhad identified. Each person around the
table discussed the issues they had. His comments were not directed to Councilmember
Pritzlaff specifically. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated when he had questions he did ask
staff. He is not an engineer, but whenever he has questions on anything, he comes to
staffto ask questions so he is comfortable. He was comfortable reading the sheets and
using the numbers as a tool to make his decision. If he had them earlier he would have
made a different decision. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Adopt Resolution - Heritage Landmark Designations - 409 Spruce Street
and 509 Oak Street - Administration
The Heritage Preservation Commission has determined that the Cadwell House,
409 Spruce Street, and the Thelen House, 509 Oak Street are eligible for
landmark designation. Staff received two phone calls from residents regarding
the Cadwell House. The neighbors agreed with the designation, but were
concerned with the timing as remodeling ofthe home is still being done. The
historic consultant feels the remodeling does not have any affect on the historic
significance. The designation is based on the form and shape of the home.
Ms. Renee Auge, 409 Spruce Street, stated they are doing the work themselves
and are well aware ofthe historical details ofthe home. They are trying to be as
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16, 2007
Page 5
true to the original building as possible. They have had some setbacks with
replacing the siding.
MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by McKnight to close the public hearing. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Fogarty to adopt
RESOLUTION R10-07 designating the Cadwell House, 409 Spruce Street and
the Thelen House, 509 Oak Street as Farmington Heritage Landmarks on the
official City zoning map. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
b) Adopt Resolution - Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement - Charleswood
Crossing - Planning
Centex Homes requested to vacate a drainage and utility easement for two single-
family residential lots in the Charleswood division. This is for Lots 6 and 7 of
Block 2. This was due to are-design of the grading plan and there is no longer a
storm sewer in that location. MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to close
the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Fogarty, second
by McKnight to adopt RESOLUTION Rll-07 approving vacating the drainage
and utility easements located on Lot 6, Block 2 and Lot 7, Block 2 of the
Charleswood Crossing plat. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) Adopt Resolution - Approve Development Contract for Farmington Area
High School and Authorize Use of Eminent Domain for Flagstaff Avenue
Improvements - City Attorney/Engineering
City Attorney J amnik presented the Development Contract for the new high
school. The district and the City are still pursuing modifications to the
improvements including the interceptor to be built with the cooperation ofthe
City of Lakeville that would require modifications to the dollar amounts. The
Development Contract provides a mechanism to accommodate future changes
with regard to the interceptor as well as the timing of the project itself. District
and City staff and Council will be meeting regularly to adjust the schedule as
necessary. As part of the improvements to Flagstaff Avenue, engineering has
identified the need to acquire additional easements. Because ofthe timing of the
project, the road has to be built by the summer of2009. Land acquisition of the
easements to build the road is a primary goal. The resolution authorizing use of
eminent domain would be used if necessary to keep the project on schedule.
There is a total of 57 parcels. Sketch plans will need to be prepared to determine
what property will be needed from land owners. If this action is necessary, it will
be brought back to Council first. Eminent domain is a tool oflast resort.
Councilmember Wilson asked about approving the development contract now and
then possible future changes due to the Sportsplex. City Attorney Jamnik
explained it would not change the contract, but it could change the traffic
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16, 2007
Page 6
management plan. Any changes or additions to the site are not required as part of
the development contract. Councilmember Wilson asked about the date of the
sketch plan referenced in the development contract. He had a concern with the
contract referencing an outdated exhibit. City Attorney J amnik stated any
subsequent changes to the site plans would be attached to the contract as part of
the engineering and specification plans.
Councilmember Pritzlaffwanted to make sure approving the contract does not tie
the timeframes of20Sth Street if a sportsplex is built. The agreement says 20Sth
Street will be built either when the football stadium opens and when there are
1750 students and/or the construction of202nd Street from Lakeville to
Farmington is completed. He wondered how much more traffic the sportsplex
will add at the same time the students are there and there should be an emergency.
He was concerned with adding more traffic than what was originally planned in
the Settlement Agreement. City Attorney J amnik noted the Settlement
Agreement states the school and the City shall share information for timely
construction of20Sth Street. Nothing would preclude the City and the school
district from building the road earlier than what was agreed to in May 2006.
Councilmember Pritzlaff would like to have more accesses than Flagstaff if the
sportsplex is built. He recalled there was to be no other development in the area
and the school would be out there by itself. Although the sportsplex is a portion
of the school, it is actually an addition to development we said would not occur.
City Attorney J amnik stated the Settlement Agreement covered several items
including adjacent development. The school district made commitments to not
propose additional conversion of non-high school property on adjacent property.
The agreement does state the City and the school would continue to look at future
community recreational needs to explore additional opportunities for recreational
facilities on both existing and future public school and municipally owned sites.
If comments are made that the sportsplex will provide an economic stimulus in
areas immediately surrounding the high school adjacent to Flagstaff Avenue, that
is a violation of the agreement. Ifthe statements are an economic stimulus and
community betterment on a community-wide basis, that is not a violation of the
agreement.
MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to adopt RESOLUTION R12-07
approving the Development Contract for Farmington Area High School and
RESOLUTION R13-07 authorizing condemnation ofland for public purposes.
MOTION by Wilson, second by Pritzlaffto divide the question. Voting for:
Pritzlaff, Wilson. Voting against: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight. MOTION
FAILED. Mayor Soderberg stated there is a motion to adopt the resolutions for
the development contract and to authorize the use of eminent domain for Flagstaff
Avenue. Councilmember Wilson stated he is supportive of the location of the
high school site. His concern is not the changes within the site, but the fact the
school board may be considering this next Monday. He would rather have the
Council act on this after there is more clarity from the school district and if a
sportsplex will be on the site. It will be up to the voters whether or not there will
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16,2007
Page 7
be a sportsplex. Councilmember Wilson stated he will not be making any public
comments one way or the other. There is a substantial need for facilities and
when the City identified the issue, the tax impact to residents was tremendous.
The impact to the school district to look at a similar issue is much more favorable.
It is to their credit they have taken the course to work with members of the
athletic association to consider this. The Settlement Agreement states in
recognition of the City's and the school district's mutual interest in and need for
recreation facilities to augment the school district's existing future curricular,
extra-curricular and community education needs and objectives as well as the
City's existing and future recreational community needs, the City and the school
district mutually agree to explore as appropriate opportunities for joint
recreational facilities and programs on both existing and future public school and
municipally owned sites. Councilmember Wilson stated the school district is not
required to come to the City. The fact that there may be significant changes on
the site is not inconsistent with the contract. He was mildly disappointed at the
school board that ifthe sportsplex proposal has been developed and initially
brought out in May that they wouldn't, given all the frustration with the
Settlement Agreement, want to make the City aware and give us an opportunity to
partner with them. Before receiving the development contract, it would have been
nice to have a dialogue with the school board. He was discouraged we have not
had the opportunity to do that.
Voting for: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight. Voting against: Pritzlaff, Wilson.
MOTION CARRIED.
b) Approve 2007 Park Construction and Planning Projects - Parks and
Recreation
Parks and Recreation Director Distad reviewed the 2007-2011 Parks Capital
Improvement Plan. Councilmember McKnight noted there is $45,000 budgeted
for the park and rec master plan portion of the comprehensive plan update and
asked what that would entail. Staff replied it would cover putting together a plan
including all maps, future direction for parks, trails, and recreational programs,
community input with public open houses, etc. It was proposed to work with
Hoisington Koegler to package the park master plans with the overall
development of the park and recreation chapter of the comprehensive plan.
Councilmember McKnight asked how much we are paying consultants to do the
major portion of the comprehensive plan. City Administrator Herlofsky noted we
are relying on the planning staff for that. Councilmember McKnight noted that is
his point. It was hard for him to support hiring a consultant on a small but
important portion of the comprehensive plan when we have staff doing the work
on a majority of the comprehensive plan.
Councilmember Fogarty was looking at the consultant fees and noted the City
would be spending $5,000 for a consultant for $35,000 worth of improvements.
She asked at what point have we learned enough from the consultants that we can
plan the parks on our own. We have a very talented Park and Rec Commission
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16, 2007
Page 8
and staff. Parks and Recreation Director Distad noted an advantage to having a
consultant is that they can listen objectively to residents. They have experience
with graphically laying out the plan. Staff does not have that expertise.
Councilmember Fogarty asked if there was a conference or software where staff
could learn this. Staff noted the other part is the time it takes to do the work.
Mayor Soderberg noted the City Administrator is very in tune to Council's
concern about spending money for consultants. As park and rec moves forward it
will be filtered by the City Administrator to make sure it is necessary and that it
could not be done in-house. City Administrator Herlofsky stated they wanted to
make sure Council saw the numbers. He suggested working with some expertise
as far as the mapping and break the costs down. We could also look at Dakota
County for assistance with mapping. Mayor Soderberg noted the only concern he
has heard is with consultants. He had faith in staff and the City Administrator to
bring something to Council that is necessary. While we have planning staff
working on the comprehensive plan in-house, he suspected eventually we will see
consultants for other portions of the comprehensive plan. We have great staff, but
when we have huge projects like this, we do need to contract some outside
expertise. City Administrator Herlofsky noted we do not have a lot of staff. We
have good staff who work very hard. Sometimes expertise is needed that is not
available and we need to look at a better way to accomplish this. It is primarily
the mapping portion that takes a lot oftime. Staff will look at options and bring
this back. If the money is not spent on a consultant, it stays in the park
improvement fund.
Councilmember Wilson asked about the status of a veteran's park. Staff replied it
is now up to the veterans. They are looking at a piece of land that has not been
brought into the comprehensive plan yet. Councilmember Wilson noted there are
many young children in his neighborhood of Middle Creek. He would have liked
to see that park developed and asked if it was scheduled for 2009 or is there a way
to re-prioritize. He would like to see more of a defined park. Staff replied the
biggest issue with Middle Creek park is that there is no street frontage. A portion
ofthe park is privately owned. A lot of the amenities are identified for that area.
There was also a concern with having a ball field and not having parking.
Councilmember Wilson asked ifthe Park and Rec Commission could look at that
area and at least have some of the more popular amenities in another area ofthe
park.
Councilmember Pritzlaff asked why $10,000 is allocated for 2007 for Newland's
Fairhill park when it will not be built then. Staff replied they have submitted the
documents for platting. The first phase of the development contains the park area
so they would be deeding the park area to the City. The actual defined area of the
park is still being worked out. Councilmember Pritzlaffwas also concerned with
the $45,000 for consultants. He noted we are taking cash in lieu for parks that are
coming in 2007 and using that money on old parks. He felt the money should be
used to build the parks in the developments from which the money was received.
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16, 2007
Page 9
Staffnoted the parks needed to be upgraded for safety concerns and to be
compliant with regulations. The cash in lieu can be used for other park areas as
long as you are making improvements to the park that increase the carrying
capacity of the park. There is no funding source for the older parks to develop.
To continue to receive funding the City needs to look at whether they want to
continue to use development fees or start levying money for park improvements.
It was decided to have park improvements as a workshop topic and Council
agreed to table this item for staff to work on it further. Councilmember Pritzlaff
wanted to table this item until after a workshop. City Administrator Herlofsky
stated staffwill review the use of consultants and some of the park improvements
based on comments made. Council was comfortable with the construction
projects. Councilmember McKnight wanted staff to work on the area of using
consultants. Councilmember Wilson agreed with the projects identified. There
should be a discussion with staff, Council, and the Park and Rec Commission on
future planning. He would prefer the City look at a large community park rather
than neighborhood parks. Projects for Mystic Meadows, Newland, and ball fields
are in the direction he would like to move. We should finish the projects from
last year. As far as workshop topics, he would put strategic planning ahead of this
topic. Councilmember Pritzlaff suggested looking at what features in the parks
are not necessary.
Mayor Soderberg noted the issue with consultants for the comprehensive plan
update was the biggest concern. If that were to be taken out of the budget he
asked if Council would vote on this budget so parks has some direction from
Council. We have reviewed these in the parks master planning process and the
Parks and Rec Commission has reviewed them. There was no motion, so this
item will be brought back after a future workshop.
c) Adopt Resolution - 2007 Seal Coat Project Feasibility Report - Engineering
City Engineer Mann reviewed the streets included in the 2007 Seal Coat project.
The total project cost is $209,800. The estimated assessment would be $79.30 per
residential equivalent unit. Some of the residents included in this area were also
assessed for Ash Street. These will be identified at the public hearing on March
5,2007. Councilmember Pritzlaff asked what ratings will be used to determine
where seal coating is necessary. Staff explained it is a judgment call by the
Engineer and the Public Works Director. MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by
Fogarty to adopt RESOLUTION R14-07 accepting the feasibility report,
scheduling the public hearing for March 5, 2007 and authorizing preparation of
plans and specifications. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Twin Ponds Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Plat and Wetland
Conservation Act Permit - Planning
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16, 2007
Page 10
The CDA is proposing to construct 50 townhome units for affordable housing and
single-family homes. The comp plan amendment would be to change the area
from medium-high density residential to low density residential and rezone the
property from R-4 to R-l in the southern portion of the Twin Ponds addition. The
CDA agreed to pay a park dedication fee for the private tot lot. The developer has
been working to resolve the issue with traffic movement to the west and the north.
They proposed to construct a 30 ft. wide roadway that would attach to the existing
right-of-way on the front of the Tollefson commercial property. Tollefson is
proposing to provide a 60 ft. wide easement for a temporary ingress and egress on
the south side of their property. The CDA will also provide a right-of-way to
allow access to the west either directly onto TH3 or traffic can take the frontage
road to Centennial Drive to the north. The right-of-way will continue to be
dedicated by the CDA going north, but there will be no road construction. It will
be a dedicated backage road.
Approval of the preliminary and final plat and the Wetland Conservation Permit is
contingent on the following:
1. Execution of the temporary ingress and egress easement agreement by
Tollefson Development.
2. All engineering issues shall be addressed and approval of construction
plans for grading, storm water and utilities by the Engineering Division
shall be required.
3. Execution of a Development Contract between the developer and the City
and submission of security, payment of all fees and costs and submission
of all other documents required under the Development Contract.
Councilmember McKnight asked if the frontage road is a City street. City
Attorney Jamnik replied it is not dedicated and there is no formal easement,
however the City has maintained it for many years so the City would have legal
jurisdiction over the improved portion. Councilmember McKnight noted this is
proposed as a temporary solution. He would like to see the Centennial Drive
access as the permanent solution from the beginning. City Attorney Jamnik
explained the easement is listed as temporary, but it is indefinite until such time as
the backage road is constructed and full access is provided at Centennial Drive.
Councilmember McKnight asked how they will close offthe access to TH3
closest to Heritage Way. Staff replied that will be up to MnDOT. They want to
close off as many accesses as possible to TH3, but keep Centennial Drive and
225th Street open.
Councilmember Pritzlaff stated it is a temporary access that he is not in favor of.
He wanted the road to go north to Centennial. He asked what communication has
been done with this developer and the developer of Executive Estates as far as the
issue of roads and a joint venture on the cost of 22Sth Street and roads leading into
the south side ofthis development. Staff stated the concern at the previous
meeting was that all ofthe traffic was heading south to Executive Estates. Now,
the traffic will go west and north rather than south to 225th Street.
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16, 2007
Page 11
Councilmember Pritzlaff suggested not having Executive Estates connected to
this development. Staff explained that planning is done and the street is in in
Executive Estates. Mayor Soderberg noted it is a policy for the City to have
interconnecting neighborhoods.
Councilmember Fogarty asked if Council could set a date where a permanent
connection could be made. City Attorney Jamnik replied it could be placed in the
City's CIP. Right now, the City would have to condemn additional right-of-way
from the property owners at that intersection. City Administrator Herlofsky stated
as far as a specific date, that is difficult. The cooperation received from Tollefson
Development and their desire to develop the property along TH3, as well as the
road belonging to the City, it does give the City some leverage in trading land if
possible to encourage the developer to acquire the land north of their property.
As the homes are built, that will cause additional pressure to develop the property
along TH3 for services for that neighborhood.
MOTION by Wilson, second by Fogarty to adopt RESOLUTION R15-07
amending the comprehensive plan from medium-high density residential to low
density residential on the southern portion of the property subject to Metropolitan
Council approval of the 2020 comprehensive plan amendment application.
Voting for: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Wilson. Voting against: Pritzlaff.
MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Wilson adopting
ORDINANCE 007-570 rezoning the property from R-4 (medium-high density
residential) to R-l (low density residential) in the southern portion of the Twin
Ponds Addition. Voting for: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Wilson. Voting
against: Pritzlaff. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Wilson, second by
Fogarty adopting RESOLUTION R16-07 approving the Twin Ponds preliminary
and final plat and the Wetland Conservation Permit with contingencies. Voting
for: Soderberg, Fogarty, McKnight, Wilson. Voting against: Pritzlaff.
MOTION CARRIED.
b) Adopt Resolution and Ordinance - Fountain Valley Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and Rezoning - Planning
The area consists of commercial, medium density, the Biscayne corridor, low-
medium density, low density, and a park. City Administrator Herlofsky noted
Castle Rock township did not take action on this item at their meeting on January
9,2007. They will review this again later in the month. Therefore, staffis
requesting Council take action on the comp plan amendment and rezoning and
direct the City Administrator to initiate the dispute resolution portion of the
Orderly Annexation Agreement if necessary.
Mr. Gary Phipho, Castle Rock Town Board, stated a change in the comprehensive
plan is a long-term decision and is permanent. He asked Council to not vote on
this and to give the Town Board the opportunity to resolve a few more issues. He
believed this would be resolved aftheir January 23,2007 meeting. He was
concerned this would be perceived negatively by Castle Rock residents.
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16, 2007
Page 12
MOTION by Pritzlaff, second by Wilson to adopt RESOLUTION R17-07
amending the comprehensive plan from non-designated to low density residential,
low-medium density residential, medium density residential, commercial, and
park and open space subject to Metropolitan Council approval of the 2020
comprehensive plan amendment application. Councilmember Pritzlaff stated
there were some compromises from the developer at the workshop and felt those
compromises are not part of this. The township had a great deal going with the
compromises the developer made. Ifit had been acted on by the Town Board, the
residents along the east side might have had a better deal. That is not part ofthis.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to
adopt ORDINANCE 007-570 rezoning the property from A-I (Agriculture) to R-
1 (low density residential), R-2 (low-medium density residential), R-3 (medium
density residential), B-1 (highway business), and P IOS (parks and open space).
APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to
initiate the dispute resolution portion of the Orderly Annexation Agreement and
proceed with contacting mediation services for assistance in resolving this issue.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
c) Elm Street Project - Boulevard Trees and Grass - Engineering
Some trees have been identified that will have to be removed due to utility
construction along Elm Street. Staff is still reviewing other impacts and how the
sidewalk will affect the trees. Dakota County has indicated they would be willing
to modify the sidewalk location in order to minimize tree loss. It is the plan to
replace trees that are removed and to fill in any gaps. The second issue is turf
establishment once the project has been completed. Staff has learned of a product
that is a mulch compost mixture that has seed in it. This would avoid some of the
issues with sod. Council agreed to use the new product.
Trees will be a workshop topic.
d) Discuss Workshop Topics - Administration
Topics suggested by Council include:
- Strategic Planning
- Council communication and overall City communication
- Parks and rec
- Council's role
- Complete engineering issues
- Assessment policy
Strategic planning and engineering issues should be discussed in the near future.
Mayor Soderberg suggested keeping a running list of workshop topics.
At the February 12,2007 workshop Council will discuss strategic planning and a
date for the retreat could be set at that time. Councilmember Pritzlaff suggested
adding Council's role to that workshop.
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16, 2007
Page 13
12. NEW BUSINESS
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
Councilmember Fogarty: Thanked the firefighters for the invitation to their banquet.
She attended the grand opening of the new Northfield Clinic.
Councilmember McKnight: Thanked the Fire Department for the invitation to their
meeting. Many firefighters received awards. He recognized Ron Lindstrom who was
awarded Firefighter of the Year. He received a call regarding the lack of outdoor ice
availability yesterday. Staff explained it is policy not to plow rinks on holidays or
weekends so as not to incur overtime. Staff does clear trails and sidewalks on holidays
and weekends because of a safety issue.
Councilmember Wilson: Thanked Lee Smick for her work on the comprehensive
planning. She has been very focused and engaged with the Met Council and other
communities.
Councilmember Pritzlaff: Thanked the firefighters for the banquet and recognized
their service throughout the year. He talked with Parks and Recreation Director Distad
regarding the snow on Sunday. He noticed the trail along Akin Road was plowed
overnight. He was told that was overtime, but we do not plow hockey rinks because it is
overtime. He asked if trails needed to be plowed on an overtime basis. Mayor Soderberg
stated that would be a policy discussion and could be discussed in a workshop. Finance
Director Roland noted the ice rinks are a recreational facility where it is a choice to
participate on the ice. The trails and the sidewalks are City property and as such are
subject to liability insurance issues with regard to accidents. Consequently, the policy
was administered to avoid insurance nightmares. That is worth overtime as it keeps the
City from a lawsuit from someone slipping on the City's trails or sidewalks.
Councilmember Pritzlaffwondered ifpeople would be using the trail in the cold weather
and not having school the next day. Councilmember Fogarty stated she is not interested
in changing the policy. There are many people who depend on the trails as their form of
transportation. Councilmember Wilson asked staff to determine how much it would cost
to clear the rinks on holidays or weekends.
City Administrator Herlofsky: A major project was accomplished without a lot of
fanfare and that was the approval of the Development Contract for the high school. He
thanked Lee Mann and Lee Smick for all the work they did. He suggested scheduling an
event with the Council and the school and for the public to celebrate the event. Council
agreed.
Mayor Soderberg: Under the Consent Agenda there was an item where the
Department of Homeland Security recognized John Powers, Fire Marshal, as a subject
matter expert and requested his assistance'. He acknowledged donations received from
the Farmington Rotary Club and ZNR, Inc. He attended the ribbon cutting at the
Council Minutes (Regular)
January 16, 2007
Page 14
Northfield Clinic and noted it is first rate. Having Mayo system doctors coming to
Farmington is a big deal. They are exploring having after hours urgent care which would
be a huge step for Farmington. Plan Farmington visioning sessions are scheduled for
January 31 and February 7 where residents can help plan the future of the City. Sessions
will be held from 6 p.m. - 9 p.m. at the Central Maintenance Facility.
14. ADJOURN
MOTION by Fogarty, second by McKnight to adjourn at 9:59 p.m. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~~
Executive Assistant
CITY COUNCILIEMPIRE TOWN BOARD
INFORMATIONAL MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 23, 2007
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m.
Present:
Gerten, Elvestad, Holmes
Soderberg, McKnight, Wilson
Approve Joint Resolution - Fairhill Annexation
This annexation is the balance of the Seed property.
MOTION by Gerten, second by Elvestad to adopt RESOLUTION R18-07 approving the
annexation of property for the Fairhill development. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION
by McKnight, second by Wilson to adopt RESOLUTION R18-07 approving the annexation of
property for the Fairhill development. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Approve Joint Resolution - Railroad Annexation
The railroad tracks run through the center of the property.
MOTION by Elvestad, second by Gerten to adopt RESOLUTION R19-07 approving the
annexation of the railroad property for the Pairhill development. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION by Wilson, second by McKnight to adopt RESOLUTION R19-07 approving the
annexation of the railroad property for the Fairhill development. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Ms. Krista Fleming, Newland Communities, gave an update on the timetable of the Fairhill
development.
The City presented a map showing proposed boundaries for an orderly annexation area. Mr.
Dean Johnson explained various areas of the map. A discussion was held regarding joint
programs for parks and recreation, etc. Mr. Gerten made it clear that Empire would like to be
their own entity.
MOTION by McKnight, second by Wilson to adjourn. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION by Elvestad, second by Gerten to adjourn. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
~?Y7~
Cynthia Muller
Executive Assistant
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
7~
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator}
FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Approve Tobacco License - Farmington Restwell Motel
DATE: February 5,2007
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
Per City Ordinance 3-7-3 the City Council has the authority to approve tobacco licenses.
The Farmington Restwell Motel, has submitted an application and fees for a tobacco license. The
required fees and application have been submitted and reviewed by the Farmington Police
Department.
BUDGET IMPACT
The fees collected are included in the revenue estimates of the 2007 budget.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve a tobacco license for the Farmington Restwell Motel.
Respectfully submitted,
y'-! '? // '
Y-~-fA Itl, ;(j71ad~L
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
7e,
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City AdminiStralO@
FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Approve "On-Sale" and "Off-Sale" 3.2 Beer Licenses- Fountain Valley Golf Course
DATE: February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTION
Per City Ordinance 3-2-5 the City Council has the authority to approve "On-Sale" and "Off-sale" 3.2
Beer licenses.
DISCUSSION
Fountain Valley Golf Course has submitted an application for an "On-Sale" and "Off-Sale" 3.2 Beer
license. The appropriate forms, fees and insurance information have been submitted with the
application and the Farmington Police Department has approved the application for issuance.
BUDGET IMPACT
The fees collected are included in the revenue estimates of the 2007 budget.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve "On-Sale" and "Off-Sale" 3.2 Beer licenses for Fountain Valley Golf Course.
Respectfully submitted,
~d~~
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
7d
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
FROM:
Mayor, Councilmembers and City AdminiSlratov
Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director
TO:
SUBJECT:
School and Conference - Administration
DATE:
February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
Each year the Minnesota MCFOA holds an annual conference for its members and individuals with
City Clerk responsibilities. This year the conference will be held in Alexandria on March 6-9, 2007.
The conference will include a trade show and offer training sessions on a variety of City Clerk
functions.
The Administrative Services Director is a member of the MCFOA and will be attending the
conference.
BUDGET IMPACT
The estimated cost for the MCFOA Conference registration, travel, meals and lodging is $650.00 and
is included in the 2007 Budget.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve attendance for Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director, at the MCFOA Conference
on March 6-9, 2007.
Respectfully submitted,
~4~~
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
7e
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
City Administrator@~
FROM: Brian A. Lindquist,
Police Chief
SUBJECT: School and Conference
DATE: February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTION
The Farmington Police Department has appointed Sergeant Rutherford and Officer Scovill to the
Dakota County Mutual Aid Assistance Group. It is necessary to provide training associated with this
appointment.
DISCUSSION
Participation in the Dakota County MAAG Team requires special training and a high level of
proficiency to achieve the desired goal of the team. The Special Operations Training Association of
the Upper Midwest provides an opportunity for officers to receive that training. The training will be
held March 18-20 in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Officers from the Farmington Police Department have
attended this conference in the past and consider it an excellent source of training.
The Police Department will be sending Sergeant Rutherford and Officer Scovill to the Conference.
BUDGET IMPACT
The cost of this conference is included in the 2007 budget for the Patrol Division.
ACTION REQUESTED
Information only.
&flli~~y
BrianA&
Chief of Police
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
~
TO:
Mayor, Council Members and City Administrator@!
Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director
FROM:
RE:
Amending Fee Ordinance
DATE:
February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTION/ACTION REQUESTED
When the City Council approved the 2007 Fee Ordinance at its December 18,2006 meeting, the park
development fee was incorrectly identified. On page 5 of the Fee Ordinance, the park development
fee should have been identified at $17,448 rather than the $16,825 that was shown. The request
being made of the City Council is to approve by motion amending the 2007 Fee Ordinance so that the
park development fee is changed to the correct fee of$17,448.
~ifllilY SJ#7
Rand~d,
Parks and Recreation Director
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
7A
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator ()
Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Appointment Recommendation - Fire Department
DATE:
February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTION
The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of a Paid On-Call Assistant Fire Chief has
been completed.
DISCUSSION
After a thorough review of all applicants for the Paid On-Call Assistant Fire Chief position by the
Assistant Fire Chief Selection committee, a contingent offer of employment has been made to Troy
Corrigan, subject to ratification by the City Council.
Mr. Corrigan has been a member of the Fire Department for 18 years. He has served as a Lieutenant,
Captain and is currently an Assistant Chief. He has held the Assistant Chief position for the last year.
Per policy, the officer positions in the Fire Department have term limits to their appointments. Mr.
Corrigan was appointed to a one-year term last year. The term to be approved at this time is for three
years.
BUDGET IMPACT
Funding for the positions is provided for in the 2007 budget.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve the three year appointment of Troy Corrigan to the position of Assistant Fire Chief.
Respectfully Submitted,
~1
/ ,//~
A/J~~~,..
)B~nda Wendlandt, SPHR
Human Resources Director
cc: Personnel file
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
7, ·
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator@
Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Appointment Recommendation - Fire Department
DATE:
February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTION
The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of a Paid On-Call Assistant Chief - Rescue
has been completed.
DISCUSSION
After a thorough review of all applicants for the Paid On-Call Assistant Chief - Rescue position by
the Assistant Chief Selection committee, a contingent offer of employment has been made to Todd
Kindseth, subject to ratification by the City Council.
Mr. Kindseth has been a member of the Fire Department for 16 years. He has served as Rescue
Lieutenant, Rescue Captain and currently holds the position of Assistant Chief - Rescue. Per policy,
the officer positions in the Fire Department have term limits to their appointments. Mr. Kindseth was
appointed to a one-year term last year. The term to be approved at this time is for three years.
BUDGET IMPACT
Funding for the positions is provided for in the 2007 budget.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve the three year appointment of Todd Kindseth to the position of Assistant Chief - Rescue.
Respectfully Submitted,
dJ l' JJ~uLt~c'
.~Wendlandt, SPHR
Human Resources Director
cc: Personnel file
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
7'
'J
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
City Administrator ((jj)
FROM: Brian A. Lindquist,
Police Chief
SUBJECT: Receipt of Donation
DATE: February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTION / DISCUSSION
On January 17, 2007 the City of Farmington received a letter and a check for $200.00 from The
House of Representatives, Farmington Middle School East. The letter states that the student body of
Farmington Middle School East held a dance to raise funds. The House of Representatives donated
funds from that dance in hope that it would aid the departments in purchasing equipment. The closing
statement in the letter is "We hope this money can save a few lives."
The residents of Farmington should take great pride in the actions of these young adults. It truly is a
fine example of giving to help another. Chief Pietsch of the Fire Department and I would like to
offer thanks on behalf of our departments.
ACTION REQUESTED
Information only.
ZSU?'4V
Brian A. Lindquist
Chief of Police
RESOLUTION No. R -07
ACCEPTING DONATION OF $200 FROM THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES, FARMINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL EAST
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 5th day
of February, 2007 at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following:
WHEREAS, the House of Representatives, Farmington Middle School East has donated
$200 to aid the Police and Fire Departments in purchasing equipment; and,
WHEREAS, it is required by State Statute and in the best interest of the City to accept
such donation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby accepts
with gratitude the generous donation of $200 from the House of Representatives,
Farmington Middle School East.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote ofthe Farmington City Council in open session
on the 5th day of February, 2007.
Mayor
Attested to the
day of February 2007.
City Administrator
SEAL
7/(
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City AdministratorQ
FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution accepting Donation
DATE: February 5,2007
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
The Heritage Preservation Commission has received a photograph and the attached letter from Mr.
Jerry Sauber and Mr. Bill Sauber wishing to donate an early 1900's photograph to the City of
Farmington.
The photograph was taken in the early 1900's and is of the former Sauber Saloon, located at the
Southeast corner of Oak Street and Second Street.
Staff will communicate the City's appreciation on behalf of the HPC and the City Council to the
Sauber family for their donation.
ACTION REQUIRED
Adopt the attached resolution accepting the donation of an early 1900 photograph of the former
Sauber Saloon
Respectfully submitted,
~c::/~
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
RESOLUTION No.
ACCEPTING DONATION OF A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE
FORMER SAUBER SALOON
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council ofthe City
of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 5th day
of February, 2007 at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following:
WHEREAS, Mr. Jerry Sauber and Mr. Bill Sauber have donated a photograph taken in
the early 1900's ofthe former Sauber Saloon once located on the
Southeast corner of Oak Street and Second Street,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Farmington hereby accepts with gratitude the donation of an early 1900's picture of the
former Sauber Saloon.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session
on the 5th day of February 2007.
Mayor
Attested to the _ day of February, 2007.
City Administrator
SEAL
December 27, 2006
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington,~ 55024
Attn: Lisa - Heritage Preservation Dept.
Dear Lisa,
We have a copy of a photograph of the early 1900' s that we would like to donate to the
City of Farmington.
The picture is of the Sauber Saloon which was across from the Old Depot, on the South
East Comer Lot of Oak Street and 2nd Street.
The picture was taken approximately 1903 or 1904 because of the age of the people in the
photo. William (Bill) Sauber is the young boy behind the bar along with Matthew (Matt)
Sauber the owner / bartender behind the bar. The other gentlemen, we are told were
railroad workers.
Sincerely,
Jerry Sauber
Sauber Plumbing & Heating, Co.
Bill Sauber
Performance Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
7<
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, Minnesota 55024
(651) 463-7111 . (651) 463-2359
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor, Council members, City Administrator B
FROM: Missie Kohlbeck, Senior Center Coordinator
Patti Norman, Recreation Program Supervisor
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Accepting Donations given
to the Rambling River Center in January 2007
DATE: February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTION
Several donations have been received at the Rambling River Center during January 2007.
DISCUSSION
The Rambling River Center was fortunate to receive the following donations:
$600 from the VFW for the annual Steak Fry
$200 from the Neilsen family in memory of Evadine Neilsen
$20 from Lena Corely
$20 from Wayne and Marilyn Briesacher.
It is in the best interest of the Rambling River Center to accept these donations. Staffwill thank the
donating parties on behalf ofthe City ofParmington
ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt the attached resolution accepting the donations totaling $840.
Respectfully Submitted,
~l~t~
Missie Kohlbeck
Senior Center Coordinator
Patti Norman
Recreation Supervisor
~~
RESOLUTION No.
ACCEPTING $840 IN DONATIONS TO THE RAMBLING RIVER CENTER
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting ofthe City Council of the City of
Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 5th day of
February, 2007 at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following:
WHEREAS, the following donations were received by the Rambling River Center in
January 2007:$600 from the VFW for the annual Steak Fry, $200 from the
Neilsen Family in memory of Eva dine Neilson, a donation of$20 from Lena
Corely and a donation of $20 from Wayne and Marilyn Briesacher; and,
WHEREAS, it is required by State Statute and in the best interest of the City to accept
such donation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby accepts with
gratitude the generous donations totaling $840 from the aforementioned donators to the
Rambling River Center.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the
5th day of February 2007.
Mayor
Attested to the _ day of February 2007.
City Administrator
SEAL
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
7h]
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator @
FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Heritage Preservation Commission 2006 Annual Report
DATE: February 5,2007
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
The Heritage Preservation Commission is required by ordinance to make an annual report to the City
Council. Attached is the annual report that has been submitted to the State Historic Preservation
Office for the purpose of documenting the City's performance as a Certified Local Government
(CLG). The report contains information on the activities of the HPC during the Federal fiscal year
which began October 1, 2005 and ended September 30,2006.
ACTION REQUIRED
For Council information only.
Respectfully submitted,
~,II~~~
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
CITY OF FARMINGTON
CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANNUAL REPORT
FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2006
The City of Farmington was designated a Certified Local Government (CLG) in 1993.
This report summarizes historic preservation activities during the period from October 1,
2005 to September 30, 2006 (FY 2006).
National Register of Historic Places
Three properties within the city limits are currently listed in the National Register: the
Akin House, the Exchange Bank Building, and the Episcopal Church of the Advent.
(These properties have also been locally designated as Farmington Heritage Landmarks.)
No properties were nominated to the National Register in FY 2006.
Local Designations
City code provides for the designation of Farmington Heritage Landmarks by City
Council resolution. The following properties previously received landmark designation:
Akin House, Exchange Bank Building, Episcopal Church of the Advent, Fletcher Block,
Farmington State Bank Building, Hamilton Clay House, and the Middle Creek Historic
Cemetery. More than a dozen additional historic properties have been evaluated as
significant and determined eligible for landmark designation; six landmark nominations
are pending and City Council action is expected in FY 2007.
Heritage Preservation Commission
The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) is a citizen advisory panel appointed by
the mayor and city council. The HPC has five voting members who are residents of the
city and serve three-year terms of office; a representative of the Dakota County Historical
Society serves as an ex-officio, non-voting member. The HPC is provided with
administrative and professional staff support.
The following individuals served on the HPC during FY 2006: Beverly Preece
(chairperson), Edgar Samuelson (vice chairperson), Tim Burke (secretary), John
Robertson, Danielle Stuckle, and Ken Stewart. Mr. Robertson and Ms. Stuckle resigned
from the commission during FY 2006.
The HPC's staff liaison in FY 2006 was Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director,
assisted by Cynthia Muller. Robert Vogel has been the city's Preservation Planning
Consultant since 1996. Mr. Vogel meets the Secretary of the Interior's professional
qualifications standards in history and architectural history.
1
Design Review
By ordinance, the HPC reviews development plans and applications for building permits
for their effects on Farmington Heritage Landmark properties. Certificates of
Appropriateness are required for demolition, new construction, and moving landmark
buildings.
HPC staff reviewed numerous development proposals and the Preservation Planning
Consultant informally commented on several projects during FY 2006. A number of
small projects were voluntarily submitted for staff review and comment by home and
business owners.
No significant historic property was destroyed or damaged during FY 2006 as a result of
any project requiring a city permit.
Historic Resources Survey and Inventory
A phased historic preservation survey of the city's urban and rural neighborhoods has
been underway since 1996. To date, approximately 75% of the city has been surveyed at
the reconnaissance level. The city maintains a comprehensive inventory of historic
buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts. Information on properties deemed
worthy of consideration in historic preservation planning is recorded on standardized
inventory forms; historic resources are also photo-documented and mapped. Duplicate
inventory forms are placed on file at the State Historic Preservation Office.
In comparison with previous years, relatively little survey work was carried out in FY
2006. No previously undocumented significant historic properties were identified,
although several previously recorded buildings and sites were subjected to more intensive
survey in order to more fully evaluate their preservation value.
Public Participation and Records Keeping
All meetings of the HPC are conducted in accordance with city policy and the Minnesota
Open Meeting Law. Minutes of commission meetings, reports, and official
correspondence are part of the permanent record of city government operations.
The HPC held six regular meetings and one special event during FY 2006. All HPC
records were maintained in accordance with Minnesota Statute 138.17 and are available
for public inspection.
Historic Preservation Conference
Beyond the minimum responsibilities for CLG programs specified in the National
Historic Preservation Act, the State Historic Preservation Office requires that all
Minnesota CLG's sent at least one member to the annual Minnesota Preservation
2
Conference. HPC chairperson Beverly Preece attended the 2006 conference in Red Wing
on September 28-29.
Other Activities
The city historic preservation program made significant progress toward its major policy
goals in FY 2006 by:
. Establishing specific goals and objectives for the HPC in calendar year 2006.
. Holding workshops for city officials and property owners to review the policies
and procedures related to the Farmington Heritage Landmark program.
. Sponsoring an open house at the newly opened Historic T. C. Davis House bed-
and-breakfast as part of the annual Historic Preservation Month observance in
May.
. Presenting the annual historic preservation achievement award (given each year
during Preservation Month) to Steve and Lisa Bolduc for their work on the T.C.
Davis House at 520 Oak Street.
. Completing Farmington Heritage Landmark nomination studies for six historic
homes in the Oak Street neighborhood; this project was financed in part with
CLG grant funds.
. Advising the city planning, building inspections, and community development
staff on the preferred approaches to preserving, rehabilitating, and reusing
significant historic buildings.
. Working with property owners, developers, and city planners to ensure that
historic properties were taken into consideration whenever development occurred.
. Providing the public with information on Farmington's heritage resources.
3
1::
Oa
l2l
~!l
tl Ii
o c
::::E~
~~
!:l "
",ell
~
'5:
.
- -
c: c:
~ ~ ~
E [5 ~~ 8E
00 c:o- ~~ 80~C:m
0m~ O~~ ~m C~U~~
CeU ~>_0G~ _m~C~a
I c: ~g~ ~~~~W::! ~~~mEE!-
!G~ I;~ I~fi~~~ g ~~~j~~8
~~~0~~~ ~-~~~1Vc: i ~~~~::!~~
~~~C~CW ca~CW9G Gm 0~~- a~G
C~~8Em~~~~Ew~.~ ~c: "~~~e::!~~~
~EuEE mc:~E~5~~~0~~~0c:a~~bc:
MG~~O~~c:~~~oom>c:E~Gc~_c9mm~&~
W~<WUI_~~mU~~_w~~W~wwwz~m~~
~~~~~~~gM~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~O
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2~~~~~~~~
!
....
o en 0 __ CO CO en m (") m -- V Lt) 0 CO ex) LO 0 CD ("') 0 N CO m "'It 01....
~~~N~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~
~~m~~~~~~ori~~~~.m O.~wriowo~
u>m__~____LO~(,,)ClO"ltLO~ ClO"lt~ __m__~.LO(")~N
"'It N__"lt__"lt__CDWM "'It N LO -- .--.--~
. ,.:
....
'"
....
"'"
on
in
O......(O.COII)(I')
Il)O.........LON"Ct
.......mCONLOO.....
aiC"'i.fli,...,aN'tO
NN N....N
......m....NLO....OCOMcocomom......LOO
~m ~~~~~~~~~~....g~~
~ai N.~NNairi~ai~ ~~.
....'" .... ("')....(\1....(")....(") N N
..0>1O
0>"'....
'''100>
~NM
_ '"
m CO...... CO '''It(W) (0 NU)(I')('I') CX)Lt)
CO..... ............NU'>....CO........
........... NLOCOlOU)COO.N......
r-:gi ..~.n~~~~~~~~
....
N ...... "'It CD CD N Lt) I I'"
WLO(D(").....NO ..,.
OCO.LO........."lt M
ai &Ii LO- aj an <<i <<i m-
N N N U')
..
....
~ 1O '" 1O ClO .... 0> ,-
,....COOOI.O'llt ......
I _,....~C'\!.C'\!.~..-~CD~ I l.t)~
&l)NOV)CD(J)N (J)
N..-..- N N (I')
'"
'"
,'....
N
(2;
~~CD~~~m
CO(l'),....(I')(I')"IltO
..--crjlli":wuiC'i
"IltN..- (1')..-(1')
..-(I')..-..-CD~..-&l)N,......-OMCDOW,....
O"llt O..-Mm..-MNI.I')CDO..-N,....(J)
W,.... "IltM~CD"IltOCOCONO Nl.t)M
Ili~ <D~~~NNNNe~ ~~~
N -c-~"Ilt..-M..-I.I')..-N M ..-
(J)l.t)..-OCOl.t)O)CO""'''IltCO'''''COCDOOCO
~~ ~~8~remN~~~m~~N
me ~~~mlli..:C'io~o 0 C'i
(I') .......-(I').....(I')..-CO~(I') (I') (I')
,...."Ilt.....Wl.t).....l.t)"Ilt(l')CO,....WCOO..-NN
NCO ,...."Iltl.t)COl.t),....mCOCDO..-I.I')NO
oeo .....O)o(l'),....,....m(l')om 1.1')..-"'"
N~ ui~~C'i..:N~Ili..:m ..:~~
(I') ..... (I')..-(I')..-(I')-c-N N N
O(l')..-mCONCDoeooOONCO(l')..-CO
(l')CO COCOI.I')"Ilt,....COCOCOMO(l')NO"llt
.....1.1') (l')1.I')<DN..-(I')-c-m"lltO COOCO
Ili~ ui~~lliuiN~~~ai N":ai
"Ilt ..- (I').-(f)..-Il'J"IltN CO..-N
....
..... ,.... co ,.... en ,.... N N 1.1') ,.... 1.1') 01"
NCO(l')""'COI.I')CO"lltO(l')CO Il'J
11.1')1.1')0 1.1')..- I.I')OCDCO 0
-.i' W N -.i''':w<li oj
It) (I') l.t) It) l.t) CD
....
COO)U'>U)..-..-O "IltN(I')O CO (I')
"'ItN(I')"IltO)O,....Lt).....,....COO-
NN N""'CO"",(")""'COO),....N
~ N- Ili": (I')~"': m 0 ai,....- ~ eti
l.O N....."Ilt..-I.I')_l.t)~"Ilt
0>
0>
0>.
e
'"
U)"'ItNmOllll.O
,m~fZ~~Sd';
m ..tN"':Ou)
(") (I')_N
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"'It"lltNNOCO(").....Lt)CO("),....N N""'CO
etiN crj"":uillietietietiai":crj crj":lli
..... ..... (").....(f).....,....~N
~~~~~~~~re~g~~~mg~
.....NLt)CON(f).....I.I')(I')OON,....CO"lltN"Ilt
lliui..:~etiIliNetiO~~ui~ uiolli
..-"Ct ..... (")-c-(I').....N.....N N..-
CD
II)
CO CO O)COCD"Ilt(l')(") CO_O)Il'JO)""''''''''''' l.O"'Itl.t)o,....mm.....co
N.....Lt).....mCOCOOOl.O,....,..............1ll0"lltNM"IltIllCO,....,...."'It
"IltN ,....,....mm..-CO(l').....l.t)O"lltOCO,....N~CONo),....COCO
eticrj lliuiai~~~etiIliIiiON~ ....: ~etio 00"":
M ..- (I').....(I')....."Ilt~(I') (f) (1')..- "'It.....N
....
....
'"
'"
1O.
:;;:
'"
....
N(f)(f)l.t)..... N(I') (I') Illll)comm""'lI) co l.t)COiNI.I')U) (I') coO
NO(l'),....NCO,....NN"IltmN...............(f)mN I.I')(I')I.I')(I')OCO
l.t)CONl.OO 0) (I') co l.t)(I').......-..... ""'0"'" ,...."IltN(f)""'(I')
eticrjO~~crjuiNetiC'iC'iOai C'i":"': ri~o "":crjlli
"Ilt..- ..... (I').....(I').....(I')(I')N N ..... M ..... N (I')
.....m,....l.t)CDOM,....Nmll)"Iltl.l')l.O,...."Ilt"llt.........."IltMCOCO.....COOIO>
m,....M"IltV)l.t)COoco.....mIl'JO(l')N.....m"llt.....O"llt"lltl.t).....oOIl)
N.....MONCO,....O"lltIt)COCOM I.I')(I')CO_o....."IltWWNmOV
1li....:Ili~Nai..:aiai..:N~ui uiai,..:Ili~C'iONuiIliN..:ui
l.t) N "Ilt....."IltNCO.....1l'J ,.... N "'It N.....(f)....."Ilt(l')m
'" ClO
o N "Ilt ..... co co ..... 01'"
mS;~CZJ:::g~g~
....: ......- (J)~ ..: ,..: ..: ....: Iii ..:
co .....Nl.t)........,...,N
ClO
....
....
..
1O
ClO
N
ClO
'"
.....,....mCOMU')O
1t;~o~~~J
N OC'iN"':~
... ..... "Ilt (I')
~ lO (!; ~ ~ ~ ~ 81f8
1 ct!......or:.,....*,...,~co_C'\!.o~q
Q) OMU'>(J)NN(I')
l.t) ..... M NU')CO
1O
....
ClO
1O
....
co (") II) co m ,.... ,.... co co ..... (") 0 0 N m (") II) 0 0 0 ..... ...... ..- ..... mOl'"
~m~~~~~rem~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~g~
~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~i~llig~~~~~~ffl~
... ..........~....."Ilt.....U')COM U') Nil)...... v.............l.O
. ,.:
~CDl.t)(")m(J)N.....,....COCO"llt~CO~~OsCO(")~.....~COl.t)OI'"
,........."Iltl.t)CONCO,....U')(I')......COo"llt..-,....m,....U')l.t)NO)......l.t)l.t)Om
CON,........."IltmCDNo,....m"lltOCOCONCOm"llt.....(")O)(I')"Ilt,....om
,..:o..:Iii,..:~~Ili..:Ili~..:ui OOui~OMuilii~Ili,..:NO
-..... ..... N CO(l')...... (1')...........-..... - -NN.....m
"- - - - - .....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '#. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ #. ~ ~ #. ~ #. #. #. #. ~ ~ #. ~I*"
NNN CD co..... "Ilt U')OM..-OCO 0) mco"lltOll'Jco"'" co mco"llt"llt(")
l.t)m(J),....cocomoNcom.....NcoN.....momCO"llt.....coocomU')
~~ON~~~~~~m~.~~~~.~~~N~~~N~
_mmmmmmmmmcomOCOONmmmmomocommm
_ ..... ....._ 0 ..........
-
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
~
c:
~
~
~
o
~
~
c:
~
>
~
~ -
S.~ e
o c: 2: ~
CD ECD'ECb
"'~ E~E2
!~Xl0 ~~~.i~
C~0" 0",.50;-
ta.cE:ge&;-:gor!
Gle-8~c:.!!.c:>"!!le
~~::J~U:.!:u.!:::!~
....
~
1O~
0'"
0"
'" ~
m
..- 0 v 0 N 0 0 0 01....
OO"lltO_OOOOIl)
Ncom_NOOLt)m"'lt
rD-a)'''':C'i('')-aillitti,..:,..:
mN(")com(l')N......"IltCO
N m (")vN (1')"'"
Iii ~
c:
m
....,
N rD 0 0 (1')\"
"Ilt (")11) co CO "'It
CO co,.... (")N"'"
NNCO- ai"':
"''''
0_
'in;:/;
"':ui
1O
.0
~
~
co ,..., ,.... co moo NIO>
(f)_rDv(f)l.t)COmN
I CO_l.O*o~-.a:.C'\!."":Nm_m_
(I')......r---COCOrD coo
....... co - N..-
'"
tv
::!
:g ~ ~ re rn ~ ~ ~I~
1(J.!,~~~~":.N(J.!,~
...........WN_CO co......
~ N..- N~
m ,.... ,.... ..... W ...... 0 N NI'"
m~gm~!;~~mt!
"':lliaicD":"Ilt-crj cDlii
M co..- Nm
-
N ...... 1.1') co <0 0 0 'l""""1_
mco(")NI.I') l.t)<O mm
I co """:.Lt)~(I')~....~.....*Lt)~CJtC"l
W,.........NCO..-CO,....
co ............ Nil)
~
c:
~
....,
co co 0 0 co NON NIClO
coomNOCOU')II)C>>CO
NrD_mN......,...."'Itm......
~ :eco-lii~~..:~m
0> -
. N
0> .. 1O 0 0> 0 0 .. "'I"
U')LOCOr---coml.t)NO).......
CO 0 (I') (1')"""'-"'" l.t) 0) co
CO-"Ilt* CO~"': 0 ~ a:i": tSJ- 0*
o ,.... ,...."Ilt..... NCO
'" ....
s ;:/; :g ~ ~ S :!l ~1f8
I o_~co~co~Il'J~......*m~Otq
..-.......,....,.......... CON CD N
(I') .......- NN
-
1O .. 0 0 .... 0 S "'10>
.....ml.l')comU')mO)co
(I') m,....co""'''''' "Ilt 0),....
~,..:;aj~-~~;t
'" '"
tl
o
U') v -.:t U') m N 0 (I') "',..
(I') tSJOII)N 1.1')11) NO>N
(")NNCO (I') "'It...... OO)N
('t) NcD..:lliftJ~('t)a:io-
co "Ilt 'V...... N_
- '"
~
z
N co 0 m co 0 0 NI....
......l.I')mNr')l.t)OO)co
N"IltO(")O.......(I')m_
o":co-Ilicrjm crjm
............. _ N:!,:
o
~
o
,.... N It) _ "Ilt II) l.t) (I') NI"
,....m-.:t............CO.....NmM
t,()N(I') co v""'''''' comU')
~ ~~cDfi;t~~~~
1O _ 0>
N N
....
!
ClO _ ~ 1O _ '" II) .... "11O
N......(I')(I')N-.:tCD.....O)U'>
OONCOV......mV......o
M cD m* cD N": o~": ftJ'm-
~.(I')t!CO;~reNiJ;~
iii ......*
....
....
8
c:
m
~
m
r::;:-l.t)~6)i/)~r::~_
N...... 0 (I') 0 'lltco......mo
co"llt,....Lt) N......m mN<q'
..cDm~C'iaiNIii,..: ai
--CO-......-(I')- 0
..... - - ..-
~
~
~
#. 55
Q
all
#. '# ~ ~ '#. #. ~ #. #.I*"
~~r::~~~m:;~m
o~o).~ci~~cico
~~.......~~S!::~~m
....
....
....
....
....
c:
.2
15.
"c:
0
Xl
0
c:
~ E
c: ~
"~ tl
m
~ <
'0
~ ~
U c:
~
~
N
'"
0
ui
ClO
-
....
'"
m
ci
<I 1O
'"
....
'"
'"
1O
~I <Ii
CD
....
0>
1O
0
~I ,.:
1O
ClO
....
0
0
....
~I 'f,
"!.
....
1O~ II
8-g la,
"'m '"
c!
::l
~
S
1O
1O
ci
'"
!:2.
~
c:
~
....,
2:-
m
E
E
~
w
~
~
~
~
m
'"
o
..
,.:
co
~
....,
'"
'"
'"
oj
ClO
....
....
:;;:
<Ii
'"
'"
tl
o
ClO
~
Ii>
0>
....
ci
'"
t:!.
>
o
Z
~
'"
'"
ri
..
e
s
{:.
-
0
0
....
-.i 0
'" ~
"!. 0
....
8
c:
.!l!
m
m
I
*" ~
~
~
N
.., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '#~'# ~ ~
Gl <<i N CD C') C') .... a> coC').... C') CO
> a> II) a> "! II) CO C')C')CO .... ~~
~ .~ m cO cO ,..; 0; cO -<i NeD. N
Gl II) ;;; II) .... :: co a>....co N 0
Q: II) ~ ~ ~
'" CD ill CD N '" 0 NC')II) m ~
CD CD N CD II) II) N CONO co
a> .... II) a> CD 0 OO~ C')
Gl e <Ii ~ -<i iii <Ii iii N~ iii ,.: 0
u
c: e N e .... ~C')"" e :::.
..
'iii
al
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ...
C') CD II) ~ co C') 0 CD a> II) a> II)
CD CD N .... II) ;; II)CDN co a>
~ .... II) co 0 CD ........ a> co ....
]i <Ii N <'l 0 <'l <'l <<JetS N a>' a>-
N ~ .... co II) ....oon 0 C')
r=. ~ N .... N ~~N C') C')
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ... ...
C') a> N l:l co C') 0 O~~ ,~ CD C')
CD co on 0 .... 0 C')co~ co 0;
CD a> ~ N co co co co a> co C')
u N <'l -<i <'l -<i -<i iii iii 0
Gl on a> C') ~ ~ ~j~ .... ....
0
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ... ...
0 C') .... C') co C') C') 0........ N on
0 0 co CD a> 0 C')OC') ....
> ~ on, C') coo co, on ....
0 ~ ,.: -<i N o~ N <Ii
z ~ .... ~ ~ .... N
,~
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ... ...
0 .... 0 C') .... on 0 0........ co N
on C') a> :: co co N ~~ N a> a>
0 .... on co N onC')co .... a>
U ~ ,.: ,.: N NN" N oj
0 N ~ ~ N N
,
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ... ...
0 C') .... C') .... ;::: .... 0"'''' ii .... a>
0 N a> C') a> .... oonon ;; co
C') ...... N C') C') 0 O~~ ....
e ~ -<i oi <'l iii Ntt'i.n -<i iii
Gl ~ on ~ ~ ~ ~
en ~
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ~. ... ... I
N u; C') .... on CD OCDCD 0 N
0 , co co CD .... co"'~ 0 a>
C') N N .... .... N OC').... 0 CD
g <'l ~ CD N 0 ~('t'). iii 0
C') ~NC') on
<(
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ... ...
;::: N .... N 0 on on CIONO .... CIO I
C') N 0 0 0 CIO on a> on co C')
3 .... CD 0 N .... .... CD ....C')~ N
<'l -<i iii 0 ~ cD ci,.....- iii iii
..., .... N N ~....on ! N
... ... ... ... ... ... ......... !,~ ... ... ""
...
~ 0 C') a> CD C') CD C')........ .... '"
CIO p; .... C') CD CDC')a> .... CD I
on a> CIO a> on CIO~a> :~ N ....
Gl N ,.: iii ,.: o~oci -<i oi
c: ~ on on ~NC') N ~
::J
...,
~.
on N 0 .... CIO a> CD"" 0 ;:::
.... CD 0 on N N ~....a>
i; CD ~ q '" ....C') CIO
~ ~ iii ~ CD- a:i ~ iii
::;; N on ~ ~ ~
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... i!;, ... ...
N '" CIO C') on CD C') onCOC') C') ....
C') .... CD CIO .... .... a> CD....~ .... a>
N on CD C') 0 N C') C')....CIO ....
9 N <Ii ~ oi ~ ~ '""'to .~ N ;t
<( ~ ~ ~ N
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ; ... ...
on <<i CD a> on .... a> a> co co CD
on , CIO .... N CIO a> a> a> 0 ;;:
a> on ~ N on CIO onOCD CD
li iii ,.: N <Ii N ci~~- 0 oi
::;; a> a> ~ C') ~ ~ C') C')
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ,~ ... ...
0 a> 0 0 a> .... on onC')CIO r! N ....
;;; u; 0 a> .... u; CD C')CDa> 0 a>
.... ~ CD .... a>C')N 0 on_ I
.a ~ <'l <Ii N ai~~- ,.:
Gl '" ~ ....
u.. J!
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ... ...
CD .... on on OClOCIO ::- N on
;;; :: , , N a> a> ....a>C') .... co
.... .... ........on ~ CIO on
c: iii <Ii iii ~ ~ N <Ii 0
.. ~ ~ ~ C')
..., z
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ... ...
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIONO 0 ;;:
0 0 0 0 0 0 C') C')a>C') 0
CDE. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on.... 0 on C')
0 0 oj oj <Ii iii oj a::J-(1)-a;; N oi
8-g N .... a> ;;: a> onC')a> on N
Nal N N ~~N N C')
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... J ... ...
c: rt z'
.12 ~~
:g
u ;u8
Ul
Gl _ll.
0 :5 g-
V.-
I I ~ E
.12 E
.. 5i '3'
'0 g g en en
c
'E ::J oon
IL = I = ;;
::J at I! .. c I!
0 e at NN
8 :I . E ;
c .: i
<( ! Ul -! Ul ~ Ul 0 Ul Ul
l!! Ul l!! 2:: l!! c Ul ~ l!!
~ ~ ::J 0 ::J ::J 0 ! Ul ::J
"" IL Gl "" "" 1; Gl"" Gl ""
.., ii .., ::J .., e ::J .., ::J.., ::J ..,
c: I c: at c: c: _ c: c: e c: c: c: c:
::J a~ Gl .!l Gl Gl ~~ Gl Gl Gl .. ..
IL Q. l. > Q. Q. U >Q. > Q.
)( .. )( . Gl )( ~ Gl )( Gl
Ul WQ: W Q: W Q.Q: W Q:W Q:
c:
.s
0>
.6
E
..
u..
'0
~
V
"
8.15.
&~
~!l
~o:
:; i!!
:Eii:
~~
;<~
~
..
E
E
::J
en
a;
0>
..,
::J
al
~
';S:
1:
8.0.
" "
",,0
2>8
tli
o c
:Iii:
!H
!:l "
:i<<Z
..,
.c
'6:
'"
l!!
::J
..
."
C
'"
Q.
)(
W
... ...
o ..,
o N
o CD
an N
.... ..,
......~ '101:.
... ...
CD
Il)
....
'"
....
... ...
'"
....
.....
;;;
... ...
.... N
.... CD
'" Il)
tti ~
N ....
... ...
Il)
Il)
CD
ai
N
... ...
~ '"
.... ....
.... ..,
eN ari
.... ..,
....
'"
N
,..:
....
...
CD
o
N
~
~
...
CD
o
~
u;
...
....
..,
N
-.f
...
~ N
.... ..,
.... ..,
....: lli
o Il)
~
... ...
.... ..,
~ Il)
CD ~
ci ...-
.... :;!:
... ...
Il)
Il)
....
w
..,
... ...
o CD
Il) 0
N CD
N or;
.., 0
~ ('1)-
... ...
....
;;
,..:
N
~
m
*'
....
'"
'"
I~
$ '"
'" il';
0::
Il)
....
....
ai
CD
N
'"
o
ai
o
CD
CD
'"
N
Il)
'"
o
..,
'"
CD
~
...
CD
;;;
or;
....
...
CD
CD
....
ci
N
...
N
....
ai
....
N
...
o
N
or;
CD
N
s
Il)
N
,..:
e
*'
o
o
iii
o
'"
l!!
:::I
..
."
C
'"
Q.
)(
W
... ...
o CD
o CD
o 0
o tri
o ..,
.., ..,
... ...
..,
Il)
N
ai
N
... ...
o
CD
"'-
:;:
... ...
;;
-.f
N
... ...
....
Il)
W
N
... ...
CD N
.... '"
Il) ..,
(t') M
N N
N
..,
CD
ai
N
...
o
..,
or;
....
...
'"
o
o_
N
...
t:
....
w
..,
...
'"
N
"'.
N
... ...
Il) ....
.... ..,
o ..,
~ ri
N ..,
... ...
CD
CD
....
'"
..,
... ...
u;
Il)
i
..,
... ...
iO
CD
....
ai
~
*'
o
CD
ex;
o
~
II ~
I! lii
S il';
0::
N
....
....
~
CD
o
CD
N
N
Il)
'"
....
N
Il)
N
m
-.f
CD
....
o
'"
CD
...
Il)
N
o
W
~
...
:!
ai
Il)
...
N
CD
....
'"
CD
...
'"
Il)
o
or;
~
N
CD
'"
ai
CD
..,
Il)
..,
ai
Il)
....
e;;-
ll)
..,
ai
Il)
~
*'
'"
....
N
Il)
[I~m,'.
I
,
'"
l!!
:::I
..
."
C
'"
Q.
)(
W
;'"
~ ~
'a '"
'6~
... ...
o CD
o 0
o 0
......- ci
~ ..,
'" 0
. N
... ...
CD
....
o
'"
~
CD
CD
-.f
'"
... ...
....
o
..,
ai
CD
Il)
CD
,..:
..,
... ...
....
'"
....
ai
N
~
CD
N
CD
ai
....
~
... ...
o
....
..,
or;
....
N
;:I;
CD
'"
'"
...
...
:;:
N
or;
CD
N
CD
Il)
....
,..:
..,
....
....
CD
N
..,
N
N
CD
....
ai
....
~
...
...
CD
....
CD
ci
..,
~
....
CD
~
W
'"
...
...
;;;
....
w
o
..,
o
"'.
:;:
...
...
....
....
....
CD.
..,
~
Il)
'"
CD
Il)-
CD
...
...
t:
....
'"
N
~
CD
CD
CD
W
'"
... ...
CD
....
N
or;
'"
-a;
....
N
....
... ...
-a;
Il)
N
Il)
ti';
'"
ai
o
N
... ...
C';
N
N
CD.
o
Il)
~
N
'"
~
... ...
C';
'"
,..:
o
N
o
Il)
CD
-.f
N
N
*'
CD
....
ai
CD
*'
....
N
ex;
CD
'"
l!!
:::I
..
."
C
'"
Q.
)(
W
'"
"I ~
I ~
tIlO::
... ...
o ..,
o ....
o ....
o an
~ 0
ll:!. U)~
... ...
CD
~
-.f
'"
'"
....
N
-.f
... ...
g
N
ai
CD
CD
....
o
or;
o
... ...
Il)
....
N
ai
o
~
N
o
"'.
~
Il)
... ...
....
CD
..,
or;
o
~
'"
CD
CD
W
CD
... ...
~ 0
.., Il)
CD CD
('f) w-
o '"
N
~
CD
or;
'"
Il)
N
~
'"
o
N
...
...
....
..,
....
ai
'"
'"
'"
CD
or;
CD
...
...
CD
o
....
,..:
CD
Il)
Il)
....
'"
o
...
...
Il)
CD
CD
or;
'"
o
....
o
-.f
N
...
...
Il)
CD
CD
ci
o
~
Il)
....
....
-.f
CD
... ...
....
..,
N
ai
o
o
CD
..,
'"
o
~
... ...
N
o
Il)
W
N
Il)
..,
CD
W
CD
... ...
....
o
N
ai
o
N.
CD
:;:
N
....
"'-
... ...
'"
..,
Il)
w
'"
N
....
CD
Il)
,..:
..,
~
*'
;;;
ci
CD
*'
'"
CD
ci
'"
'"
l!!
:::I
..
."
C
'"
Q.
)(
W
... ...
CD
'"
..,
N
;;;
'"
... ...
....
Il)
"'.
u;
N
... ...
N
o
....
'"
Il)
N
... ...
CD
N
'"
W
....
..,
... ...
CD
;;;
N
CD
..,
... ...
~ N
Il) CD
CD CD
~ r-:
Il) ....
.., ....
'"
CD
..,
W
....
....
;;;
....
ci
'"
N
...
u;
o
N
Il)
....
Il)
....
N
ci
N
'"
Il)
'"
'"
....
....
...
...
...
... ...
CD
CD
~
ci
;:I;
... ...
..,
....
....
ai
;;;
... ...
Il) CD
o ....
CD '"
N \If
'" ..,
'" N
C'i .
... ...
CiO
....
....
'"
N
:!.
~
~
*'
'"
'"
;~
:::I '"
>
-'"
...0::
..
c
o
II
o
o
CD
'"
o
CD
'"
o
'"
Il)_
;;;
N
CD
CD
ai
....
N
;;;
N
CD
Il)
..,
N
~
ai
;;;
o
'"
..,
ci
'"
..,
t:
or;
CD
..,
...
...
N
'"
~
'"
CD
..,
...
;;
Il)
w
;:I;
...
CD
o
or;
;;;
CD
o
'"
or;
N
..,
....
CD
CD
'"
..,
....
iO
o
CD
ai
CD
>E:
Co
'"
~
~
i
."
C
:::I
LL
C
.s
D>
.5
E
'"
LL
'0
>-
..
c..>
-
C
8
u
<(
C
o
:s.
'C
u
'"
'"
o
:g~
0'"
N :::I
m
c
'"
..,
J:>
'"
LL
li
=-
<(
'"
C
:::I
..,
~
'"
E
E
:::I
en
Gi
D>
."
:::I
m
u
o
>
o
Z
u
'"
o
iii
'0
I-
8
c
'"
iii
m
~
,2:
*' 8
'"
0::
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ci ci 0 0 ci 0 ci 0 0 0 ci 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<0 V N 0 CO <0 V N N V <0 CO
- - - . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..... ..... ..... ..... I I I I
~ ~ ~ ~
a:>uelea PUn::l
Q)
()
~ r:::
C CO
CO
0 u:: CO
..
CD .c "C
C U) r:::
,- co :::J
E 0 I.L
~ ... 'C LO
co 0
E ca C
E U. :3 0
" N
VI .... I.L .11 ....
4i
C> 0 l!
't:I co
" ~
CD CD 0
C 0
0 CD N
C) .
, ,.
Z'
'C;:
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
70
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator@
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Pipeline Crossing Agreement - 195th Street Project
DATE: February 5,2007
INTRODUCTION
As part of the 195th Street Extension Project, a trunk water main pipe will need to be constructed
crossing a Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) line. A permit to cross must be obtained by the City
before utilities crossing this railway line can be constructed.
DISCUSSION
Attached to this memo is a copy of the permit for execution by the City of Farmington. A fee of
$900.00 is required for permission to cross the rail line. Other expenses incurred by CPR for
flagging, inspection, repair work, etc. shall be billed to the City.
BUDGET IMPACT
The cost of the CPR permit for rental to cross the railway line is $900.00 and will be funded from the
project budget. Additional costs may be incurred as described in the attached letter and will also be
funded from the project budget.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve by motion the attached Pipeline Crossing Agreement.
Respectfully Submitted,
,&)fJ1~
Lee M. Mann, P .E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
Pipe Line Crossing Permit No. 31763
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of the 1st day of June, 2006, by and between SOO
LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, doing business as Canadian Pacific Railway, hereinafter called "Railroad
Company," and CITY OF FARMINGTON, hereinafter called "Licensee,"
WITNESSETH:
1. The Railroad Company grants to the Licensee permission to install and maintain a pipe line
meeting the specifications and at the location as follows:
A.
Specifications:
Type/Material
Diameter
Contents/Purpose
Depth below top of rail
DIP
32 inches
Water
14 feet
B.
Location:
Section, Township & Range
City, County & State
Railroad Milepost
SUNey Stationing
NW1/4 NE1/4 Section 19, Township 114 North, Range 19 West
Farmington, Dakota County, Minnesota
250 feet South of Milepost UP 329, Merriam Park Subdivision
at Survey Station 1623+52
hereinafter called "pipe line" and shown in the location indicated and in accordance with the details shown
upon the map labeled "Exhibit A" that is attached hereto and is made a part hereof and also pursuant to
the specifications contained in "Exhibit B" that is attached hereto and made a part hereof, subject to the
conditions hereinafter set forth.
2. The Licensee shall pay the Railroad Company the sum of $900,00 in advance as rental for
the permission herein granted, and shall assume and pay all taxes and assessments that may be levied
or assessed against the pipe line, or against the Railroad Company's property by reason of the location of
said pipe line thereon. Except as provided in paragraph 9 below, this agreement shall continue in effect
until terminated by either party hereto upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the other. The Licensee
shall not, by reason of termination of this agreement, be entitled to refund or reimbursement of any
payment, or portion thereof, made by the Licensee under this agreement.
3. The Licensee, after first securing all necessary public authority, shall at the Licensee's sole
expense install and thereafter maintain the pipe line upon and across the Railroad Company's property
and underneath any railroad tracks located thereon at the above described location, in a manner
satisfactory to the Railroad Company's Chief Engineer, and in strict conformity with the requirements of all
laws, ordinances and orders of competent public authority now existing, and future modifications thereof,
so as not to endanger the safety of railroad or other operations upon said property and so as not to
endanger the safety of the persons or property near or adjacent to the Railroad Company's property,
4. The Licensee shall be responsible for determining the location and existence of any pipes,
wires, conduits, sewers, piling or other obstructions to the construction of Licensee's pipe line and shall
indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Railroad Company from and against any and all liability for
damage to the foregoing pipes, wires, conduits, sewers, piling or other obstructions, if any, caused by the
construction or maintenance of Licensee's pipe line. The Railroad Company makes no representation by
the granting of this license that its property is free of any such pipes, wires, conduits, sewers, pilings or
License No. 31763, Farmington, MN
Pipe Line License Form 300.07/03.std
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FARMINGTON
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
other obstructions. The Licensee's obligations hereunder shall survive the termination or expiration of this
agreement.
5. The Licensee shall not carry on any work in connection with the installation, maintenance,
repair, changing or renewal of the pipe line underneath or in close proximity to any railroad track at the
above described location before giving the Chief Engineer at least five (5) days' written notice at his
headquarters located at Minneapolis, Minnesota, and not until an authorized representative of the
Railroad Company shall be present to supervise same, Upon bills being rendered therefor, the Licensee
shall promptly reimburse the Railroad Company for all expenses incurred by it in connection with such
supervision, including all labor costs for flagmen supplied by the Railroad Company to protect railroad
operations, and for the entire cost of the furnishing, installation and later removal of any temporary
supports for said tracks, which said Chief Engineer or his authorized representative may consider
necessary while such work is in progress.
6. The Licensee, at the Licensee's sole expense, whenever notified to do so, shall promptly
make such repairs to or changes in the pipe line, including change in location, as said Chief Engineer or
his authorized representative shall for any reason consider necessary and require. The Railroad
Company shall have the right, at its election, to make emergency repairs to the pipe line, and in such
event the Licensee, upon bills being rendered therefor, will promptly reimburse the Railroad Company for
all expenses incurred in connection therewith.
7. Maintenance and use of the pipe line upon and across the Railroad Company's property at
the above described location, however long continued, shall not vest in the Licensee any rights adverse
to those of the Railroad Company.
8. As one of the material considerations of this agreement, without which the license granted
hereunder would not be granted, the Licensee expressly assumes any and all risk of damage to or
destruction of the pipe line through any cause whatsoever while located upon or across the Railroad
Company's property, and hereby releases and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the
Railroad Company and its directors, officers, stockholders, divisions, agents, affiliates, subsidiaries,
predecessors, successors and assigns, or anyone acting on its behalf or their behalf, from and against
any and all Claims (including without limitation any Claims arising under any Environmental Law and all
Claims arising at common law, in equity or under a federal, state or local statute, rule or regulation) of
every kind, past, present and future, existing and contingent, known and unknown, arising from any injury
to persons, firms or corporations whomsoever (including the parties hereto and their employees, agents
and invitees), including injuries resulting in death, and damage to property whatsoever (including property
of the parties hereto), wherever such persons or property are located, caused by or attributable to, in
whole or in part, the presence of the pipe line upon the Railroad Company's property, or any act or
omission of the Licensee (or the Licensee's employees, agents, contractors, representatives, or invitees),
including without limitation the Use or Release of Hazardous Substances by the Licensee and the breach
by the Licensee of any of its warranties, representations or covenants. The Licensee's obligations
hereunder shall survive the termination or expiration of this agreement.
9. If the Licensee shall default on its obligation to make any payment required under this
agreement, the Railroad Company may immediately declare this agreement and the permission herein
granted terminated without advance notice to the Licensee. The waiver by the Railroad Company of a
breach by the Licensee of any provision hereof, shall be limited to the act or omission constituting such
breach, and shall not constitute a continuing or permanent waiver.
10. This agreement shall not be assigned or in any manner transferred by the Licensee,
voluntarily or involuntarily, by operation of law or otherwise, without the advance written consent of the
Railroad Company. Any attempted or purported assignment or transfer by the Licensee without such
consent shall be void. Subject thereto, this agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon
the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties,
License No. 31763, Farmington, MN
Pipe Line License Form 300.07/03std
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FARMINGTON
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
11. Any notice given by the Railroad Company hereunder shall be good if served personally upon
the Licensee or if deposited in a United States post office, certified mail, addressed to the Licensee at the
licensee's last known address.
12. The Licensee, at the Licensee's sole expense, within thirty (30) days from the date of service
of notice of termination as above provided, shall take up and remove said pipe line from the Railroad
Company's property at the above described location and restore said property to a condition satisfactory
to said Chief Engineer. Failure on the part of the Licensee to do so shall constitute an abandonment of
the pipe line by the licensee, and the Railroad Company shall have the right to remove the whole or any
part of the pipe line from said property and perform said work of restoration, and in either event the
Licensee, upon a bill being rendered therefor, shall promptly reimburse the Railroad Company for all
expenses incurred in connection therewith, plus fifteen percent (15%).
13. The Railroad Company shall not be required to assume any portion of the cost of the
construction of said pipe line or future maintenance thereof.
14. The Railroad Company does not warrant title to the above-described property, and the
Licensee shall have no recourse against the Railroad Company in the event the Licensee shall be
required, through the action of any third party, to either remove the pipe line from the Railroad Company's
property or to make any payment to avoid such removal.
15. Each provision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, and word of this agreement shall apply
to the extent permitted by applicable law and is intended to be severable. If any provision, paragraph,
sentence, clause, phrase or word of this agreement is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such
illegality or invalidity shall not affect the legality or validity of the remainder of the agreement.
16. (A) .Claim" or "Claims" means any and aI/liabilities, suits, claims, counterclaims, causes
of action, demands, penalties, debts, obligations, promises, acts, fines, judgments, damages,
consequential damages, losses, costs, and expenses of every kind (including without limitation any
attorney's fees, consultants' fees, response costs, remedial action costs, cleanup costs and expenses
which may be related to any Claims);
(8) "Environmental Law" or "Environmental Laws" means the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C, 9 9601 et seq" the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S,C. 96901 et seq., the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, 33 U.S.C. 9 1251 et seq., the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S,C. 9 1321 et seq" the Clean Air Act, 42
U.S.C. 97401 et seq., the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C, 92601 et seq., all as amended from
time to time, and any other federal, state, local or other governmental statute, regulation, rule, law or
ordinance dealing with the protection of human health, safety, natural resources or the environment now
existing or hereafter enacted;
(C) "Hazardous Substance" or "Hazardous Substances" means any pollutant,
contaminant, hazardous substance or waste, solid waste, petroleum product, distillate, or fraction,
radioactive material, chemical known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity, polychlorinated biphenyl or
any other chemical, substance or material listed or identified in or regulated by any Environmental Law;
(D) "Release" or "Released" means any actual or threatened spilling, leaking, pumping,
pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, disposing or spreading
of any Hazardous Substance into the environment, as "environment" is defined in CERCLA;
(E) "Use" means to manage, generate, manufacture, process, treat, store, use, re-use,
refine, recycle, reclaim, blend or burn for energy recovery, incinerate, accumulate speculatively, transport,
transfer, dispose of, or abandon a Hazardous Substance.
THE PARTIES HERETO have caused this agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first
above written.
License No. 31763, Farmington, MN
Pipe Line License Form 300.07/03std
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FARMINGTON
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
500 LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
doing business as Canadian Pacific Railway
By
Director, Real Estate Marketing, U.S.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By
Its
Not Assignable Without Consent
NOT TO BE RECORDED IN PUBLIC RECORDS
License No. 31763, Farmington, MN
Pipe Line License Form 300.07/03std
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FARMINGTON
CANADIAN PACIF'IC RAILWAY
J
-- .~. . .~~---'.' .
.' .. . '. ",. '.' .1-:--",
~~41
.t~/.
I
f
: ".
. r---1 0:'"
~ l~.... z
I
..1
.... .\
, I
I
I
I
I
\
. .,1 "
'. " I
. ' ;':'c "
. t.
'-
~
..,-
-~
I
I
I
l
t
'.f. .', -::-:-.'
. . . .~
. .
\:'1
. .; I
..
" ...,.
. ;.1.
city ofFannington
installing 32" OD
Casing for 21.6"
ODwatermain, 14'
below top of tie @
65d angle under
track @ Stn.
1623+52, near UP
MP 328.9
'. .; ~ .
..~ 9
:"fl." z..,
..,' f\
..'-." Cl
. ..lr
.~ .
.....~
.... ..~..
~
0\',
~~.~.
~...,
Z ('
'<:t .'.', .
~..'
......
~,"..,.
0\ "
......
u ."
C1)
r:/)
y~
~\.
'$.'
.~\
-\'t
~ .
<:
I
-17
.,
.' "
.JL;...
i,;.~l ,.'
,,'. .....1\1 fl.E
.. . : ".'
"; ,.1.
"-.
. ~. , :
. : :; ':-, ~
.., ~ :
",t;
. , ..
. ". , ' .
. . . -' ,
E Cnnndlo'n Po.clf'lc Rnllwo'y
X Engineering Depo.rt",ent (US)
H Box 530 Mlnneo.polls, MN 55440
I
B
I UG Water Main
T Farmington, Dakota, MN
05/16/06, UP MP 328.9 Mer Pk
'A' Line Seg. MN51, Scale: 1"= 400'
. :.' :
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
7p
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato(;V
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approve Change Order - 2006 Mill and Overlay Project
DATE: February 5,2007
INTRODUCTION
Forwarded herewith is Change Order #1 for the 2006 Mill and Overlay Project.
DISCUSSION
The change order consists of four items. It includes the removal and replacement of an old,
deteriorated catch basin, leaf removal necessary prior to paving, and miscellaneous concrete work.
BUDGET IMPACT
The total amount of the change order is $5,456.88.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve by motion, Change Order #1 for the 2006 Mill and Overlay Project in the amount of
$5,456.88.
Respectfully submitted,
~J1It~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
Owner:
Contractor:
Dec. 28, 2006
CHANGE ORDER NO.1
2006 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT
Description of Work:
This Change Order provides for payment for Work Done.
1
2
3
Item Unit
CHANGE ORDER NO.1
REMOVE AND REPLACE CB STRUCTURE EA
LEAF PICK UP LS
601 HERITAGE DRIVEWAY CURB LS
703,715,719 CENTENNIAL CIRCLE - STEPS AND
SIDEWALK LS
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.1
Contract
Quantity
1
1
1
Unit Total
Price Amount
$981.88 $981.88
$1,925.00 $1,925.00
$1,000.00 $1,000.00
$1,550.00 $1,550.00
$5,456.88
No.
4
Recommended for Approval by:
Date
Approved by Contractor:
ASLAKSON'S BLACKTOPPING SRVC. INC.
Approved by Owner:
CITY OF FARMINGTON
Date
Date
Change Order #1
Page 1
CIl
'en
~
co
c
co
c-
o U
- 0)
Cl '0' <D
.!: c.. 0
E >-~
coco--
u."i::C:;
-0)--
O>N
>-0 ......
"=~
()=
~
<D
o
o
N
-
....
~lJ
c 0)
2.-0
.... ::::l
O).e
>
o
Q)
Cl<D
-00
::::l0
.eN
-0 --
O)U')
CIlN
.- --
>Ol
0)
0::
....
0)
1ii CIlI
- -0
~i:i5
-0
::::l
CO
I
~I
~I
000 0
000 0
000 ' 0
U') 0 0 U')
1'-. '-:. q CO
NNN cD
c.D"C"""""C"""" ro
......U')N CO
th
00 0
qq q
00 0
U') U') 0
I'-N 0
NN Ll"i
<DO <D
......('1) "<t
th
00 0
qq q
00 0
U')U') 0
I'-.N.. 0
NN U')
<DO <D
......('1) "<t
th
CIl
0)
::::l
C
0)
>
Q)
0:::
CIl
....
0)
c
;:
o
0)
E-o
,gC-o
0.2 c
-(1)2~
2.g'Ci5g
ffi 'C ro c
ECO>~
CIl~>Q3
CIl-oEU
3l CO .... 3l
CIl 0 .8 .-
<(O::CI)~
~.
~\ l,c ~
~ Jl~ ~
- -- Q ~
......('I)OOl......U')OO<DOOl"<t ~ $
~~q~~~qq~~~I~ ~ ~~
~~a5~[;;R~g;:!~CO ~I -:r ~~
~q~qN..~~~"<t'-:. I~ ~~ .~
...... U') Ol CO ...... U') ('I) I'- "<t <D ('() (;)
U') t::.. I'- ::::.. ~ ,...... i
-
...... ('I) 0l......U')0 <D 0 Ol "<t
N U') U')"<tl'-O ~~~ U')
c00 Nr-.:O..o , "<tNCO U')
Ol N COOlI'-N I'- <D ('I)
I'-Ol ON<DN "<t ....... <D
r-:Ll"i 05"":Ll"i "<t ri
a51 I'- 0
Ol
...... ('I) 0l......U')0 <D 0 Ol "<t
~~ U')"<tl'-O ~~~ U')
('1)0 Nr-.:O..o "<tNCO U')
OlN COOlI'-N I'-<D ('I)
I'-Ol O.N.<D. N "<t ....... <D.
I'- U') CO......U') "<t ('I)
0 I'- 0
CO Ol
o
o
o
o
o
cD
U')
I'-
o
o
o
CO
('I)
0>
I'-
o
q
o
o
o
('I)
I'-
('I)
o
q
o
('I)
o
......
"<t
o
q
U')
I'-
"<t.
N
('I)
('I)
('I)
CO
N
I'-
N
<D
I
CIl
C
o
CIl
.::.t.
CO
Cii
<(
2
t;::
0)
I CCl
t5 2 .!: ~
~ -0 Ci5 0)
C cO)--l
,C? ~'6, ~
'-' O)c C
6 Cl~W 01)-
:.;::::; .S; 0 0 ~ c
g CIl Ci5 ~ e CIl 0)
.... .~ 0) 0) Ui Cl'c g>
Ui o...!: CL 0) .!: ,- :;:;
cc..Cl>-cUiEc
O::::lc,,= 00)-0 0
()CI)W()COI-<(()
00
00
00
I'- 0
<DCO
rir-:
......('1)
o
o
o
U')
CO
cD
CO
CO
00
qq
00
I'- 0
<D ('I)
rir-:
......('1)
o
o
o
o
o
U')
<D
"<t
I'- 0
<DU')
-.ir-.:
o"<t
...... N
r-:ri
('I) ('I)
o
o
o
o
q
U')
<D
"<t
Cl- U CIl
.!: ~.!!l ~
.!!l'ffi E .2
1:: c...... '0
O)c..O)c
> co.c 0)
-0 .. 0 c..
-:x; x
W
ro
o
I-
o Ol
o U')
0..0
o"<t
0......
rio>
I'- I'-
('1)('1)
th
c..
CO
U
0)
....
t5
CO
....
C
o
()
c
.9
t5
::::l
....
Ui
C
o
()
-0 -
._ c
.e ::::l
- 0
~ E
'OJ CO
".:: U
o CO
....
C
o
U
CO
C
o
:e
-0
-0
CO
\
~
o
; r
:= '5
;/
CO
to
U')
"<t
Ll"i
010
U')I'-
..oN
"<tU')
......U')
Nri
U')<D
I'-
Ol~"""
NON
o:>..oc0
Ol 0 Ol
<DOlI'-
Ll"ir-:r-:
...... 0
CO CO
th
CIl
~
~
CO
::::l
0-
ro
C
~
-0
-0
<(
<D
o
--
......
('I)
N
......
@)
0)
Cl
CO
C
'ffi
Q)
....
CIl
CIl
~
7t
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrat&
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approve Change Order - 20Sth Street West Project
DATE: February 5,2007
INTRODUCTION
Forwarded herewith is Change Order #1 for 20Sth Street West Project.
DISCUSSION
The change order consists of four items. The first two items address additional work necessary to
install storm sewer near an existing hydrant. It was determined in the field that an existing hydrant
would need to be moved due to the location of the new trunk storm sewer being installed. Due to
continuing coordination with the developers engineer on the project, the design of the storm sewer
changed after the bids were received. These two items allow for payment to salvage the hydrant,
reinstall in another location with a wet tap and test the new line. The other two items are for
additional clean outs needed for the sanitary sewer stub lines.
BUDGET IMPACT
The total amount of the change order is $6,740.00. This project was designed and is being funded by
the developer of the third phase of the industrial park, minus the City's contribution of up to
$200,000 for the street and related storm sewer items and the City's responsibility for trunk utilities.
The costs for the trunk utilities are being paid for with trunk funds per policy. The hydrant
relocation, necessitated by the trunk storm sewer installation, will be paid for out of the Water fund.
The costs of the sewer stubs to the property to the north will ultimately be funded by the developer of
that property.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve by motion, Change Order #1 for the 20Sth Street West Project in the amount of $6,740.00.
Respectfully submitted,
;d:Yh~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
C'l~Y COpy
Owner:
Contractor:
Date:
1/17/2006
CHANGE ORDER NO.1
208th Street to Pilot Knob
Description of Work:
This Change Order provides for payment for Work Done.
2
3
4
Contract Unit Total
Item Unit Quantity Price Amount
CHANGE ORDER NO.1
16"x6" WET TAP INCL. VALVE, BOX, INSTALL
SALVAGED HYDRANT, DRAIN, RETEST LS $5,250.00 $5,250.00
18" HYDRANT EXTENSION FOR RELOCATED
HYDRANT EA 1 $475.00 $475.00
8" CLEAN OUT EA 2 $350.00 $700.00
6" CLEAN OUT EA 1 $315.00 $315.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO, 1 $6,740.00
No.
Recommended for Approval by:
at-il1~
lZlt' ~7
Date
Approved by Owner:
CITY OF FARMINGTON
Date
Date
Change Order #1 208th Street to Pilot Knob
Page 1
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
7'("
FROM:
Mayor, Council Members,
City Administrator@
Lee Smick, AICP
City Planner
TO:
SUBJECT:
Authorize update of the City's Comprehensive Utility Plans
DATE:
February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTION
As part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update, the system plans need to be updated to reflect the
new growth in Farmington and the expected growth to 2030.
DISCUSSION
Attached are proposals to update the Water, Sewer, and Surface Water Management plans. The
existing plans were completed between 1996 and 1997 by Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates.
Because of the growth in Farmington from 1997 to the present, there is the need to update the plans
along with preparing updates for new growth from now to 2030.
BUDGET IMPACT
The Water, Sewer, and Storm Water funds will pay for the cost of these plans. The costs are
proposed to be hourly not to exceed based on the proposed scope of work as follows:
Water Fund Sewer Fund Storm Water Fund
$52,000 $37,500 $68,200
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve by motion the attached proposals for updating the Water Supply and Distribution Plan, The
Comprehensive Sewer Plan, and Surface Water Management Plan will be prepared by Bonestroo
Rosene Anderlik & Associates.
&1&:Q
Lee Smick, AICP
City Planner
~ f1 ~ Bonestroo
e Rosene
~ Anderlik &
. \j. Associates
Engineers & Architects
2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul, MN 55113
Office: 651-636-4600 . Fax: 651-636-1311
www.bonestroo.com
January 30, 2007
Ms. Lee Smick
City Planning & Zoning
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024-1374
Re: Water Supply and Distribution Plan Update
BRAA File 141-06287-0
Dear Lee:
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to assist the City with updating your 1997 Water
Supply and Distribution Plan. This letter outlines the major issues and provides a work plan to
update the plan. Our services will be provided in accordance with the 2007 agreement between
the City of Farmington and Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Where appropriate,
we have listed work that City staff will perform.
Task 1: Project Initiation and Data Collection
We will review data and infonnation collected for the 1997 Water Supply and Distribution Plan
and supplement that data with information for facilities constructed since the 1997 Plan
publication. We will also review all of the supplemental modeling and information gathering
done by Bonestroo since publication of the Plan (such as the 2006 SE Expansion Update Memo
and the 2006 Water Emergency & Conservation Plan). Additionally, we will facilitate and attend
one meeting with Farmington staff as well as one meeting with the Farmington Water Board.
These "Kick-off Meetings" will be used to obtain the remaining data from the City, and to get
input on any changes, modifications, or improvements that they would like to see in the water
system, and review the City's 2030 and Ultimate Land Use Plan. The current City's 2030
Comprehensive Plan boundary has been established and a figure of this boundary is attached to
the end ofthis proposal. It will be extremely important to establish an ultimate service area
boundary for the water system if it is determined to be different from the City's 2030 boundary.
In terms of data collection, we assume that City staff will provide us with water use data,
mapping data (GIS shapefiles), land use and densities and water system "Record Plans." A
specific list of data needs will be submitted to the City prior to the Kick-off meeting.
Task 2: Water Usage Review and Projections
We will obtain and review water use data collected since the 1997 Plan in order to establish
existing water use patterns. We will utilize Water System Emergency and Conservation Plan data
St. Paul, St, Cloud, Rochester, MN . Milwaukee, WI . Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
Ms. Lee Smick
Water Supply and Distribution Plan Update
January 30, 2007
Page 2
to establish design water use patterns for various land use categories. We will establish water use
at points throughout the City based on the updated land use plan. We will coordinate the land
use and densities with the Comprehensive Sewer Plan to insure uniformity. Design average day
and maximum day water demands will be established for the years 2030 and the ultimate build
out ofthe City. Maximum fire flow requirements will be reviewed based on Insurance Services
Office and City requirements (provided by the Farmington Fire Official).
For this task, we anticipate that the City will provide population projections, summarize water
use (average and maximum day use for each service area), provide water billing summaries
(water use by customer type and top 10 users), provide a copy of the latest ISO Report, and
provide a representative from the Fire Department at the review meeting.
It is assumed that City staffwill give us GIS shapefiles of existing developed parcels, existing
zoning, and future land use. Bonestroo will use GIS to calculate developable acres by land use
type for each of the junction nodes created for the computer model, and establish design water
use patterns (average day, maximum day, peak hour, and fire flow) for the year 2030 and the
ultimate City build-out.
We will also prepare an hourly demand variation curve - specific to Farmington. This curve
shows how the water demand varies by time during a peak day event. An accurate representation
of this curve enables us to fine tune water supply and storage requirements. This curve will be
based on the best available Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) data.
Because the result of this task affects the remainder of the study, we will meet with the City to
review the projected water demands and fire flow requirements.
Task 3: Water Supply Evaluation
Farmington has set aside a number of sites for future wells. As Farmington continues work on its
trunk water system, we must determine how many additional well sites are required. It may be
that some of the well sites owned by the City are not required - or, the City may need additional
well sites. A separate well field model has been created and will be included with this report.
We will examine the ultimate demands that will be placed on the Farmington water supply
system (determined in Task 2) and calculate the number of well sites required to meet those
demands. We will draw from data completed by others regarding expected well capacity and
spacmg.
We will also discuss the issue of back-up wells with City staff. As the City completes the water
system, you will need to decide how many back-up wells are "enough." The City needs to have
enough back-up wells to carry you through unanticipated situations. As part of this study we will
investigate connections to neighboring communities that could potentially be used in lieu of
drilling a back-up well.
Task 4: Water Treatment Evaluation
This task will consist of a simple review of the existing well water quality with respect to current
and proposed drinking water standards. This evaluation will include both public health concerns
Ms. Lee Smick
Water Supply and Distribution Plan Update
January 30, 2007
Page 3
and aesthetic issues, such as taste, odors, and "red" or "black" water complaints. The City would
provide recent water quality tests for every well.
We will review the existing conceptual water treatment plant site plan and comment on the
adequacy of the site.
Task 5: Hydraulic Modeling
The existing hydraulic model ofthe Farmington Water System will be upgraded to a WaterCAD
model. WaterCAD is a powerful analytical tool that operates in a totally integrated AutoCAD
and GIS environment. The computer model and results can be viewed with City base maps, land
use maps, or integrated into a City GIS system. By simulating operation of the water system, the
computer model:
,/ Reveals system problems,
,/ Predicts the effects of alternative solutions, and
,/ Predicts the effects of system expansions.
Pipes constructed since the 1997 Plan will be added to the model, and the calibration of the
model to actual system performance will be checked. Bonestroo will provide a recommended
testing program for hydrant flow tests, and perform computer model runs to verify that the model
reasonably represents the actual field tests. Bonestroo staff will perform all hydrant flow tests.
The model will then be used to evaluate the performance of the existing water system and to size
future trunk water mains, to serve development. Additionally, the model will be used to address
these near-term concerns:
,/ Finalize the main sizing needs ofthe SE area expansion.
,/ Verify the location of future wells and storage facilities.
,/ Refine the operation ofthe system as new tanks come on-line and evaluate the need to
continue using the 670,000 gallon standpipe.
Task 6: Capital Improvement Plan
A water utility must have a sound basis for planning the expansion of its water system. This is
especially true now, with increasing regulations regarding property acquisition, public
notification and construction. A sound Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) will enable Farmington
to have the required facilities in-place by the time they are needed.
The CIP will be prepared for the trunk water system. The CIP will be in one-year increments
through 2010, in five-year increments through 2030, and will consider remaining improvements
to be post-2030.
The CIP will be based on the best available projections from the City for population, land use,
and water use. Additionally, the CIP will be linked to benchmark events to allow Farmington to
update the CIP easily. For example, wells and water towers will be tied to water use thresholds.
Ms. Lee Smick
Water Supply and Distribution Plan Update
January 30,2007
Page 4
Distribution system improvements will be linked to future development or to coincide with street
reconstruction projects.
Task 7: Economic Analysis
The operation of a water utility must have a sound financial basis. Planning-level cost estimates
for all of the proposed trunk water system facilities will be prepared and presented in the report.
An estimate ofthe land required for wells, water towers, and water treatment will be provided so
that an estimated cost for land acquisition can be included in the cost of each facility. The City
will provide land costs. These costs will be included in the CIP described above.
Based on the overall cost ofthe ultimate trunk water system, we will review the City's existing
charge system and make recommendations for adjustments.
Task 8: Report and Presentation
The Final Bonestroo report will include graphics and figures to clarify items discussed in the
report. The information in the report will be organized for ease of access by various audiences. A
clear, concise Executive Summary and Recommendations section will assist the City Council
and the city staffto review this document. Technical information will generally be placed in an
appendix.
This work consists of the following subtasks:
Draft Report for Staff Review: For several ofthe major tasks described above, technical
memoranda will be prepared and submitted to Farmington for review. Because the results of one
task can affect others, technical memoranda on each task will be prepared as the task is
completed. We will attend the following meetings with City staff and the Water Board:
Meeting Goals
Kick-off Review scope ofproject, obtain data
Meeting
Progress Establish design population projections
Meeting 1 and ultimate water demands, and
discuss hydrant flow testing procedure
Progress Review calibration runs, existing
Meeting 2 system hydraulic analysis and
supply/treatment preliminary results
Progress Review ultimate system analysis
Meeting 3
Progress Review draft report, CIP, and economic
Meeting 4 analysis
A draft report for the entire study, including all applicable maps, figures, and appendices will be
compiled and presented to City Staff and the Water Board for review (at Progress Meeting 4).
Ms. Lee Smick
Water Supply and Distribution Plan Update
January 30, 2007
Page 5
Final Report: Following review by City Staff and the Water Board, a final report will be
prepared and 20 copies submitted to Farmington,
Costs
We propose to complete the Water Supply and Distribution Plan Update for an hourly not-to-
exceed fee of $52,000. This cost is broken down by task in the following table.
Task Cost
1. Project Initiation $3,000
2. Water Use Review $3,500
3. Water Supply Evaluation $2,700
4. Water Treatment Evaluation $2,500
5. Hydraulic Modeling $19,300
6. Capital Improvement Plan $1,600
7. Economic Analysis $1,800
8. Report $15,000
Reimbursable Expenses (maps, report printing, mileage,
miscellaneous) $2,600
Total Water Plan Update $52,000
rfyou have any questions regarding this proposal please call me at (651) 604-4881.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK ASSOCIATES, INC.
~/~
Timothy L. Grinstead,
Project Manager
~
~
:J
-
=
~
~
31
ffilll!III
b
u :J.QQI <',...
,.~
C a
LfU %
c
[
rT ,.,,.,,,.. '"~ 11I1..h
~U
j
I
t=::7
rr~
'"
/L
-----
=-
50'
u
.'J
I
-
I-
- [;;;;
-
City of Farmington
2030
Comprehensive Plan
STUDY
BOUNDARY
JANUARY 2007
Feet
, '
o 3500
k: 141\1410628S\gis\prj\Sludy-loc.apr
-/
/
~~
~- '-
V
~
-
J~
+r--- J
r
~f
Iln
I
f1J
A<:h ~t
u-
&. Study Boundary
N City Boundary
N Parcel Base Map
~
~_...
__-.flIo_
lJ1~
-.-
~
~~
-
b
./
I
~
]
~
:=J
.
<Ii
I]
I3lIIIIIII!J
~
p
o~
L
L
-
Ln
... -US!
'II-
~ NJt
~ ?<;<;th~tW ~
JfU
-
[
c
JL]j Bonestroo
~ Rosene
~ Anderlik &
. \J. Associates
Engineers & Architects
2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, MN 55113
Office: 651-636-4600 · Fax: 651-636-1311
www.bonestroo.com
January 30, 2007
Ms. Lee Smick
City Planner
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Re: Proposal for Farmington Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update
Dear Lee,
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to assist the City of Farmington in preparing a
Comprehensive Sewer Plan (CSP) as part of Farmington's 2030 Comprehensive Plan update.
In this letter we will outline our understanding of the work and provide a cost for our services.
We have organized the project into four tasks, as described below.
Task 1: Project Initiation and Management
There are two basic components to this task: collecting the data necessary to complete the study
and meetings. In regard to meetings, we are proposing two meetings with staff and a
presentation to the City Council and Planning Commission. The cost for the meetings includes
attendance and preparation of basic visuals, as needed. Our proposed fee also includes time for 3
update memorandum to staff during the course of the project.
In terms of data collection, we have access to as-built plans and the latest parcel and utility base
maps in house. What remains is 2030 land use plan. We recommend that this be nearly
complete before we begin the sewer plan modeling, though the sewer model update (task 2) can
proceed without the final land use plan.
This task also involves confirming with staff the service (or growth) area for the City's proposed
sanitary sewer system including trunk connections by other communities through Farmington's
system.
. St. Paul, St. Cloud. Rochester. MN · Milwaukee. WI · Chicago. fL
Arrlrmatlve Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
Ms, Lee Smick
2030 Comprehensive Sewer Plan
January 30. 2007
Page 2
Task 2: Sewer Model Update to Current Conditions
Farmington's current sewer model is a spreadsheet model created in 1997 for the 2020
Comprehensive Plan. As new sewer pipes were constructed the model was not systematically
updated to reflect as-built conditions. The 2030 Update affords the City an opportunity to create
a sewer model that accurately reflects 2007 conditions. Moving beyond the comprehensive plan
update, an accurate and detailed sewer model will be an indispensable tool in the development
review and design process. The specific subtasks of this effort and expected deliverables
include:
. Sanitary sewer trunk model update based on as-built sewer information
. Updates to sewershed boundaries in GIS format
. Lot counts to replace current area calculations for sewer flow in areas of existing
development
. Calibration of unit sewage flow rates to existing lift station and flow metering data
The sewer model update will be city-wide, though portions of the City's system have had
modeling updates, such as the Flagstaff area and the Southeast area. The rest of the City will be
updated in detail similar to what was accomplished for these two areas.
Task 3: System Analysis and Design for Future Conditions
We will create an updated sewer system model for the City of Farmington that reflects projected
development in the City's 2030 growth area. This model will be comprehensive in that it will
include existing and 2030 proposed areas. We will also pay attention to Met Council metering
data and City lift station data, as available, and revise the City's average sewer flow and peak
flow factors as necessary to better approximate actual flows generated within the City.
Farmington's sewer model will be spreadsheet based and includes the following worksheet tabs:
1. Sewer districts and areas cross tabulated by land use
2. Average sewer flows by sewer district
3. Peak sewer flows
4. Existing and proposed pipes and capacities
5. Costs and capital improvement for expansion of the Farmington's system
Task 4: Prepare 2030 CSP
We will submit to Metropolitan Council the documentation necessary to constitute a 2030 CSP,
as detailed in Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook and other guidance. Previous
land use work by City staff combined with Bonestroo's sewer modeling and analysis of existing
flows allows us to prepare the following required components of the CSP:
. Community forecasts in 10 year increments to 2030
o population
o sewered and unsewered population
o sewered employment
o all forecasts by interceptor service area as well as city-wide
. St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, fL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
Ms, Lee Smick
2030 Comprehensive Sewer Plan
January 30. 2007
Page 3
. Land use map showing proposed boundary changes, as applicable
. Sewer system map showing existing and proposed system including
o Lift stations
o Sewer trunks
o Waste disposal sites
o Connection points to the Metropolitan Council's system
o Intercommunity connections
o Private and public WWTPs
o Sewersheds defmed by major connection point to Metropolitan Council's system
. Tables that demonstrate
o Developable acres by land use (sewer model spreadsheet described above)
o Capacity of trunk sewers and lift stations (sewer model spreadsheet)
o to-year incremental design flows by trunk sewer reach
o Summary of projected flows by connection point to the Metropolitan Council
system
. Sewer model, node to node flow summaries as described above
. Narrative on the City's infiltration and inflow program
Task 4 Review and Approval
This task involves responding to Metropolitan Council comments on the 2030 Comprehensive
Sewer Plan. Typically, Metropolitan Council comments are brief and easily addressed. As part
of our fee we have included up to 8 hours to respond to these comments. If, for some reason,
additional comments require more than 8 hours effort, we will bill this time on an hourly basis.
The Comprehensive Sewer Plan typically comes after much of the detailed demographic work
associated with the Comprehensive Plan. Our proposed work plan and fee are based on that
work being complete or nearing completion, before we begin task 3.
We propose an hourly not-to-exceed fee of $37,500 for the work outlined above.
Expenses would include the following:
Miscellaneous:
4 staff review drafts with system map:
122030 CSP Amendment final report with system map:
pdf version of report:
Total:
$400
$200
$1,200
No Charge
$1,800
Total project costs would then total $39,300.
Given authorization to proceed we can begin immediately. We expect to have a draft report
2 months after the City has fmalized their land use plan and demographic information.
. St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
Ms. Lee Smick
2030 Comprehensive Sewer Plan
January 30. 2007
Page 4
Our project team has extensive Farmington and sewer plan experience and includes:
. Bob Barth, Project Manager
. Erik Peters, P.E., Senior Engineer
. Earth Evans, P.E. Engineer
. Emily Resseger, Engineer
If you have any questions regarding this proposal please contact me at 651-604-4740.
Sincerely,
Bone:~/:J"sene, Ande~li~ and ASSO\)
'l;r/ /11 \// /J #d~\,_/
I/\.;/ l rf t'-&tJ(j ?<'Ut - ~C-.----
Bob Barth
Water Resources Engineering Team Leader
. St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
~ Bonestroo
-=- Rosene
~ Anderlik &
. \j. Associates
Engineers & Architects
2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul. MN 55113
Office: 651-636-4600 · Fax: 65 J -636-1311
www.bonestroo.com
January 30, 2007
Ms. Lee Smick
City Planner
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Re: Proposal for Farmington Local Surface Water Management Plan Update
Dear Lee,
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to assist the City in preparing a Local Surface Water
Management Plan (LSWMP) both as part of Farmington's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update and
to meet the requirements of the Vermillion River Watershed District. In this letter we will
outline our understanding of the work and provide a cost for our services.
LSWMP Tasks
There are essentially two components of the LSWMP: technical and regulatory. The technical
tasks include modeling, cost estimating, and mapping. The regulatory tasks include those items
necessary to comply with watershed district, Metropolitan Council, and state requirements.
Regulatory tasks are guided by the desire to dovetail the LSWMP with NPDES MS4 regulation,
including Farmington's Loading Assessment and Nondegradation Report, and with the
requirements of the Watershed District.
Task 1: Project Initiation and Management
There are two basic components to this task: collecting the data necessary to complete the study
and meetings. In regard to meetings, we are proposing two meetings with staff, two meetings
with regulatory agencies, and a presentation to City decision makers. The two regulatory agency
meetings could include Watershed, Dakota County, and MnDNR staff, as required. The cost for
the meetings includes attendance and preparation of basic visuals, as needed. Our proposed fee
also includes time for 6 update memoranda to staff during the course of the project.
In terms of data collection, we will require access to as-built plans and have the latest parcel and
utility base maps in house. Though the 2030 land use plan and demographic information would
be useful before we get too deep into the plan, most of the LSWMP can be completed without
this information. There is some overlap in data collection with work associated with Phase 1 of
. St, Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
Ms. Lee Smick
Surface Water Management Plan Update
January 30. 2007
Page 2
the City's Loading Assessment, which we understand will be underway at the time the LSWMP
is authorized and our proposed compensation reflects this economy.
This task also involves confirming with staff the service (or 2030 growth) area for the City's
proposed stormwater system including connections by other communities through Farmington's
system such as proposed from Lakeville.
Task 2: Surface Water Model Update
We will update the 1997 Surface Water Management Plan model to include all developments
that have occurred since this model was created. This requires a review of these development
plans and incorporation of individual development review models into a new master model.
Integral to this effort is updating the City's GIS mapping to incorporate changes in drainage
boundaries that have occurred due to development. The end result is a new master model that
correlates to GIS mapping of drainage boundaries. We will also incorporate models created for
the Southeast Area and the Newland Communities AUAR area to complete the 2030 growth area
modeling.
The new master model and accompanying GIS mapping becomes a powerful tool for the City of
Farmington and its decision makers. Surface water management decisions in one location have a
strong impact downstream. A comprehensive model allows the City to make decisions related to
storage and conveyance knowing that the model accurately reflects downstream impacts. This is
particularly important in representing how Farmington's system affects individual landowners,
businesses, and the townships that lie downstream. A detailed model also indicates that
Farmington takes its surface water management responsibilities seriously and demonstrates to
the regulatory agencies that the City has a strong basis for all its management decisions.
Task 3: Goals and Policies
Goal and policy statements are a statutory requirement of Local Surface Water Management
Plans. The goals and policies developed for Farmington will guide how Farmington approaches
surface water management. Given the importance of formulating reasonable goals and policies,
we intend to work very closely with staff in developing these.
Task 4: System Assessment
Farmington's LSWMP is required, by Minnesota Rules and Statute, to have a system assessment
section. Under this task we will summarize the various studies conducted by Farmington, the
Watershed, MPCA, MnDNR, Dakota County and others and determine the impact that study
conclusions and management recommendations might have for Farmington. We will prepare a
"gaps analysis" where we compare regulatory controls at the various levels of government.
Using this tool we can determine whether there are gaps in Farmington's surface water
management program that need to be addressed. The "gaps analysis" may determine that there is
overlapping jurisdiction in specific areas, and we might develop recommendations to eliminate
areas of overlap. One overarching goal of this task is to take these assessments and develop
specific implementation steps for Farmington.
. St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
Ms. Lee Smick
Surface Water Management Plan Update
January 30, 2007
Page 3
Task 5: Wetland Management Plan
Metropolitan Council requires that LSWMPs incorporate a
Wetland management plan that incorporates afunction and value assessment for
wetlands. Presettlement of stormwater prior to discharge into wetlands must be
consistent with values and uses of wetlands as identified in the wetland management
plan.
Farmington has already accomplished much wetland inventory work for their future growth
areas. Under Task 5 we will:
. Create a wetland classification map. There is a need to update and combine the original
map from the 1997 SWMP to include new development areas, the SE Area Wetland
Inventory area and other gaps that may exist in the data.
. Field check select wetlands to fill in any data gaps identified in the mapping. Field checks
will also be performed (using MnRAM 3.0) on any wetlands not currently inventoried.
For example, wetlands delineated along the Flagstaff Avenue project would be included.
. Update the City's wetland ordinance. We will assess how the current ordinance has been
working and will update it based on this assessment and based on new Watershed rules.
. Provide guidance on how to manage wetlands to reduce the negative impacts of increased
bounce and high water duration that sometimes result from development.
Task 6: Implementation Plan
The Implementation Plan describes those corrective actions for issues identified in the
assessment. These corrective actions could be policies, ordinance, design standards,
maintenance items, or capital improvements. The implementation plan also considers
infrastructure necessary for Farmington to expand its system to serve the 2030 growth area and
how that infrastructure will be financed. We will also prepare a financial analysis of the storm
water utility. The goal of this is to determine if current funding matches projected
responsibilities and whether new mandates like the NPDES MS4 Permit and SWPPP, and the
Nondegradation Report recommendations necessitate stormwater utility rate increases.
The implementation plan will be coordinated with any implementation items that corne out of
the city's Nondegradation Report and will describe amendment procedures for the LSWMP.
Task 7: Prepare LSWMP Report
Under Task 7 we will prepare a LSWMP for the City that meets statutory requirements, is
compatible with the Watershed plan, and meets the Metropolitan Council requirements for 2008.
Sections of theLSWMP are spelled out in Minnesota Rules and include:
1. Purpose of plan
2. Water resource management related agreements
3. Executive summary
4. Land and water resources inventory
5. Establishment of policies and goals
. St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
Ms. Lee Smick
Surface Water Management Plan Update
January 30, 2007
Page 4
6. Assessment of problems
7. Corrective actions to problems identified in number 6
8. Financial considerations
9. Implementation priorities
10. Implementation program
11. Amendment procedures
Much of this content is developed in the work tasks described above. The LSWMP we prepare
for Farmington will also have appendices summarizing the modeling completed under Task 2.
In the fall of 2005, Metropolitan Council issued its 2030 Water Resources Policy Management
Plan (2030 Plan). The 2030 Plan adds content requirements for local surface water management
plans and stipulates that this additional content be included with the overall comprehensive plan
submittals due in September of 2008. Among these new requirements are ones that might have
some bearing on Farmington's LSWMP:
1. Local ordinances to implement the plan such as:
a. Erosion and sediment control ordinance
b. Stormwater management ordinance
c. Wetland protection ordinance
d. Buffer ordinance
e. Shoreland ordinance
f. Floodplain ordinance
g. Critical area ordinances where applicable (consistent with Executive Order 79-19)
2. Outline ways to address thermal pollution effects, particularly in watersheds with thermal
sensitive environments/fisheries (i.e., trout streams, fens).
3. Integrate stormwater practices that promote infiltration/filtration and decrease impervious
areas (LID or Low Impact Development), where practical.
4. Wetland management plan that incorporates a function and value assessment for wetlands.
Presettlement of stormwater prior to discharge into wetlands must be consistent with values
and uses of wetlands as identified in wetland management plan.
5. Water quality goals for each water body.
6. Information related to MPCA's TMDL program, where applicable.
7. Policies related to nondegradation.
8. Required elements of MPCA's NPDES Phase II stormwater management program, where
applicable, including:
a. Public education and outreach
b. Public participation/involvement
c. Illicit discharge detection and elimination
d. Construction site runoff control
e. Post-construction runoff control
f. Pollution prevention/good housekeeping
Each of these items, to the extent they are applicable, must be addressed in some way by the
policy narrative in the LSWMP. Of particular importance is the emphasis on coordinating the
LSWMP with the City's NPDES activities.
. St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
Ms. Lee Smick
Surface Water Management Plan Update
January 30. 2007
Page 5
Task 8: Review and Approval
We will submit the LSWMP document to the Vermillion River Watershed and Metropolitan
Council for review and comment. At the city's request, we would also submit to Dakota County
for their review . We will address comments through response letters and appropriate changes to
the Plan. Comments from watersheds related to local plans can sometimes be voluminous and
sometimes be brief. In general, it is important that the City address all comments whether staff
and consultant believe them to be valid or not. Not knowing the extent of comments that will be
made on the city's LSWMP, we have based our budget on what, in our experience, is a typical
set of comments. For this reason we are proposing a $1,500 budget which would cover several
comments each from the Watershed and Metropolitan Council. Responding to more extensive
comments, to the extent they require response, will be billed on an hourly basis once the $1,500
budget is exceeded. We emphasize that our approach to this project is to engage early and often
with Watershed, County, and DNR staff. We have found that this sort of collaboration expedites
the review process.
For the work described above, we propose an hourly not-to-exceed fee of $68,200.
Expenses would include the following:
Miscellaneous:
4 staff review drafts with 2 large format maps,
and up to 10 8'12 xlI figures:
4 agency review drafts with 2 large format maps,
and up to 10 8'12 xii figures:
12 final reports with 2 large format maps,
and up to 10 8~ xiI figures:
pdf version of report:
$800
$300
$300
$1,800
No Charge
$3,200
Total:
Total project costs would then total $71,400.
Given authorization to proceed we can begin immediately. We expect to have a draft report
2 months after the City has finalized their land use plan and demographic information.
If you have any questions regarding this proposal please contact me at 651-604-4740.
Sincerely,
.// ~
B~~ytfo(~sen~, A~derlik, an~f/ociatr ._.//./
..../ '/.' / ~/t~ //1..~ _
/ . .-' ~ IJ .' / I~. ~ ~
{nv /i~/( / ,.. " ~
Bob Barth
Water Resources Engineering Team Leader
. St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
~
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrat'@
Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Approve Therapeutic Massage License
DATE:
February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to City Ordinance 3-15-8, a public hearing must be held to issue a Therapeutic Massage
License.
DISCUSSION
Ms. Barbara Flaherty has applied for a Therapeutic Massage License. Ms. Flaherty will be practicing
therapeutic massage at Farmington Barbers which is located at 324 Third Street. The required
application, attachments and fees have been submitted and approved by the Farmington Police
Department.
BUDGET IMPACT
The fees collected are included in the revenue estimates of the 2007 budget.
ACTION REOUIRED
Approve a Therapeutic Massage License for Barbara Flaherty at Farmington Barbers, 324 Third
Street.
Respectfully submitted,
%oAff4?(~
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
100..
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator @
FROM: Jennifer Collova, Natural Resource Specialist (}t.--
SUBJECT: NPDES Nondegradation Assessment Scope of Services - Phase 1
DATE: February 5, 2007
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve, by motion, the attached Scope of Services for Phase 1 ofthe City's Nondegradation Plan.
BUDGET IMPACT
The work to provide the services for Phase 1 would be billed on a time and materials basis with a not-
to-exceed figure of$36,900, plus $350 in reimburseable costs.
DISCUSSION
Minnesota nondegradation rules (MN Rules Ch. 7050.0185, adopted in 1987) specify conditions for
discharges to surface waters that have occurred since 1988. They support state policy to protect
Minnesota waters from significant degradation and to maintain uses, habitats, and water quality in
these waters. These state policies were put in place in order to comply with the "antidegradation"
part of the federal Clean Water Act passed in 1972.
Since 2003, most municipalities with a population between 10,000 and 100,000 have been required to
secure from MPCA a permit for discharge of stormwater from their municipal storm drainage system
to waters of the state under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program.
These systems are known as municipal separate storm sewer systems or MS4' s.
In an effort to comply with the Minnesota nondegradation rules, the MPCA revised the NPDES
permit program in 2006 to require 30 municipalities across the state whose stormwater discharges are
permitted through the MS4 program to complete additional work that will enable the state agency to
determine if nondegradation rules were being met. MPCA selected these 30 MS4s based on their
assessment of those communities most likely to have expanded stormwater discharges to surface
waters. Farmington is one ofthe 30 permitted MS4s to which this requirement applies.
The work required includes conducting a pollutant loading assessment, writing a nondegradation
plan, and modifying the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to include both
the assessment and the plan. In addition, Farmington must complete a nondegradation analysis for the
discharge of stormwater to the Vermillion River which is an Outstanding Resources Value Waters
(ORVWs).
Farmington must complete the nondegradation requirements and submit its revised SWPPP to MPCA
no later than January 1, 2008.
Completion of the nondegradation requirements would be phased as follows:
Phase 1 - Preliminary Work and Pilot Loading Assessment
Phase 2 - City-Wide Loading Assessment
Phase 3 - Nondegradation Report and MPCA Submittals
Please see the attached Scope of Services for additional and more specific information
JtjS~
J!::[llova
Natural Resource Specialist
cc: file
~f1~ Bonestroo
.... Rosene
G Anderlik &
1 \j. Associates
Engineers & Architects
2335 West Highway 36' St. Paul, MN 55113
Office; 651-636-4600 . Fax: 651-636-1311
www.bonestroo.com
January 29, 2007
Ms. Jennifer Collova
Natural Resource Specialist
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington., MN 55024-1374
Re: Proposal to complete NPDES Nondegradation Loading Assessment and Plan,
Phase 1
Dear Ms. Collova:
As per your request, submitted herewith is a proposal to help the City of Farmington
meet its NPDES MS4 permit obligations for nondegradation. Below is a brief background
on nondegradation, followed by a description of the phasing proposed for the project and
a description of tasks and a cost estimate for the first phase of this three phase project.
I. Background
Minnesota nondegradation rules (MN Rules Ch. 7050.01851 adopted in 1987) specify
conditions for discharges to surface waters that have occurred since 1988. They support
state policy to protect Minnesota waters from significant degradation and to maintain
uses, habitats, and water quality in these waters. These state policies were put in place in
order to comply with the "antidegradation" part of the federal Clean Water Act passed in
1972.
Since 2003, most municipalities with a population between 10,000 and 100,000 have been
required to secure from MPCA a permit for discharge of stormwater from their municipal
storm drainage system to waters of the state under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) program. ll1ese systems are known as Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer Systems or MS4' s.
In 2003, the MPCA was sued by the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy over
the State's alleged noncompliance with its nondegradation rules. As part of the court
action, the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled specifically that the permit issued by MPCA
to conditionally authorize stonnwater discharge from an MS4 system under the NPDES
program had to address nondegradation requirements in the rule.
St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochesteil MN · Milwaukee. WI · Chicago. IL
Affirmative A<llon/Equal Opporlllnlly Employer and Employee Owned
In an effort to comply with the court action, the MPCA revised the NPDES permit
program in 2006 to require 30 municipalities across the state whose stormwater
discharges are permitted through the MS4 program to complete additional work that will
enable the state agency to determine if nondegradation rules were being met. MPCA
selected these 30 MS4s based on their assessment of those communities most likely to
have expanded stormwater discharges to surface waters as reflected by:
. population changes since 1990,
. current population, and
. projected population growth to 2020.
Farmington is one of the 30 permitted MS4s to which this requirement applies.
The additional work includes conducting a pollutant loading assessment, writing a
nondegradation plan, and modifying the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) to include both the assessment and the plan. The MPCA will consider a
permittee to be in compliance with the nondegradation rules if baseline (1988-1990)
loading levels of stormwater runoff volume, total phosphorus, and total suspended solids
can be achieved, either through existing facilities, programs, and policies or through
proposed modifications to these. The baseline condition is used as the "yardstick" to
measure compliance unless mitigating environmental, economic, and social factors make
additional control measures unreasonable.
In addition, many municipalities must complete a nondegradation analysis of "prudent
and feasible alternatives" to discharge of stormwater to restricted waters as part of the
requirements of the new general permit. This affects Farmington because portions of the
Vermillion River to which the City's municipal storm drainage system disch<:lrges are
designated trout streams, one type of restricted water. Farmington must complete all of
this work and submit its revised SWPPP to MPCA no latcr than January 1, 2008.
It is important to note that as of the date of this contract, no loading assessments or
nondeg plans have been submitted by any city to the MPCA as part of the NPDES MS4
nondegradation effort. Further, the earliest deadline for any of the selected 30
communities is September 1, 2007, which is well after the desired work initiation date for
Farmington (most communities are allowing 12 months to complete their nondeg
projects). Thus, specific guidance on what methods MPCA will consider acceptable is
lacking to a large degree. The MPCA has published a draft permit guidance manual
(March 2006) that provides only cursory direction for preparing the loading assessment.
However, while preparing loading assessments for some other communities, Bonestroo
staff have had informal conversations with MPCA staff to obtain clearer direction
regarding the loading assessment methods MPCA will consider acceptable and we will
incorporate that direction into our approach for the City of Farmington.
2
The time available to complete this work in order to meet the MPCA-imposed deadline is
somewhat short. At the same time, the nature of the work is somewhat ambiguous,
partially because MPCA has not provided clear direction on how to efficiently meet the
requirements of this component of the revised MS4 permit. Even if some additional
direction is forthcoming from MPCA, it may not be timely and/or materially helpful for
the City. Given these factors, a phased approach is recommended to complete the
f'londegradation requirements of the MS4 permit, as follows:
Phase 1 - Preliminary Work and Pilot Loading Assessment
Phase 2 - City-Wide Loading Assessment
Phase 3 - Nondegradation Report and MFCA Submittals
U. Overview of Phased Approach
Phase 1 would consist of preliminary work tasks, including the development of an
approach appropriate for the City of Farmington to meet the nondegradation submittal
requirements. This would include the following elements:
. Meetings with City staff to jointly define the scope of the effort needed, the
appropriate level of detail, and the data needed to support the effort.
. Collection, review, evaluation, and organization of existing data to help refine
the project approach and level of effort, identify the geographic scope of the
project, and determine the split of responsibilities between City and consulting
staff for executing the project to produce a credible product cost-effectively.
. Completing load assessment modeling and summarizing results for a portion
of the City to flesh out technical and strategic issues that will help define the
approach used in the succeeding phases for the entire City.
. Development of the scope of work, schedule, and budget for Phase 2 - City-
Wide Loading Assessment for review by the City.
Phase 2 will focus on completing the Loading Assessment. ll1is phase of the project will
involve most of the modeling. Accurate scoping of this effort cannot commence until the
areas of the City that need to be analyzed are known and load quantification points have
been identified. The scope of services, schedule, and budget for this task would be
developed near the end of Phase 1. The costs of completing the loading assessment
modeling and preparing a summary report of findings can be expected to be $2,000 -
$3,000 per square mile of area modeled depending on data availability and the split of
responsibilities between consulting and City staff. At this preliminary stage, we estimate
that about 12 square miles within the estimated 2020 boundaries of the City will need to
be modeled, so our estimated cost range for this task is between $24,000 and $36,000.
A detailed scope of services and a final budget for this phase will be developed at the
conclusion of Phase 1.
3
Phase 3 will involve preparation of the Nondegradation Report as well as any necessary
submittals to MPCA, including modifications to the City's Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The full scope of this effort will not be clear until the Loading
Assessment is nearly complete at the end of Phase 2, at which time a scope of servic~s
schedule, and budget will be prepared. Completion of this phase is expected to cost
between $12,000 and $20,000, depending on how much City staff can, and would like to,
do. A detailed scope of services and a final budget for this phase will be developed at the
conclusion of Phase 2.
It should be noted that before final submittal of the nondegradation report to the MPCA
the City is required by MPCA to provide the opportunity for the revised SWPPP to be
reviewed by the appropriate local water authority (currently the Vermillion River
Watershed Joint Powers Organization) and the public. After local review is completed
and changes, if any, are made to the report, the City must send a copy of the public and
local water authority input with the City's responses, along with the proposed SWPPP
changes, the nondegradation report, and the load assessment model data to the MPCA.
We propose to handle the public review and response to comments portion of this task on
an hourly basis, since - even with the completion of Phases 1 and 2 - the scope of the
effort will not be evident until after the comments are submitted.
III. Scope of Services for Phase 1
The following tasks will be carried out as part of this phase:
1.1 Work with City staff to determine the expected boundaries of the City in 2020 and
define the project area(s) to be analyzed for Phase 2. Also, determine the
availability of suitable land use/land cover data for each of the three time
conditions to support the modeling for Phase 2 within the project areas and define
who will provide that data and in what form.
1.2 Produce a map that shows:
a. A preliminary determination of the City's expected 2020 jurisdictional
boundaries to help define the project area for the Phase 2 analysis.
b. Show generally which areas were fully developed for the baseline
condition (circa 1988-1990) and where there is a reasonable expectation that
there will be negligible changes in land use as it affects impervious
coverage.
c. Show general areas between the baseline condition and the 2020 boundary
that were developed between the baseline period and present (2003-2005).
The budget for this item assumes that the base electronic data to prepare the map
can be readily obtained from the City and can be easily modified to show general
areas that have been or will be the subject of new or re-development activity
development during the time periods of interest.
4
1.3 Identify the restricted waters within the City that are likely to be subject to the
nondegradation "prudent and feasible alternatives" analysis as well as those
portions of the study area that need to be incorporated into the analysis. Outline
an approach for meeting that requirement.
1.4 Conduct a preliminary loading assessment for a small area within the project area
and present and discuss the results with project and City staff as means of
demonstrating data needs and uses as well as defining expectations for Phase 2.
1.5 Work with City staff as appropriate to determine the means by which identified
data gaps can be filled and determine who will be responsible for
developing/obtaining the data.
1.6 Work with City staff to define an overall strategy for the Loading Assessment to
address all waters (including restricted waters). This includes identifying
modeling methods, approaches, and parametersi identifying load estimation
points, etc. and preparing a scope of work for Phase 2.
1.7 Meet with City staff to discuss findings, discuss data needs and availabilityl and
determine strategy and direction that will set the direction for future phases of this
project. A total of four meetings in Farmington are assumed for this budget item,
along with preparation and follow-up. As part of this sub-task, the Vermillion
River Watershed Joint Powers Organization will be contacted to see how they
might be able to assist the City in preparing the nondeg assessment for
Farmington.
1.8 Provide project management services including preparation of monthly invoices,
providing direction for both project and City staff to make sure all are in
agreement with the overall strategy and their responsibilities, and incidental
contact with state agencies and others to develop Farmington-specific guidance.
1.9 Prepare summary memo of not more than 10 pages plus attachments that outlines
the findings from this phase of the project.
IV. Schedule and Compensation
Phase 1 will be completed within 12 weeks of the date of approval of the contract by the
Farmington City Council. The work to cover the Phase 1 services described above will be
billed on a time and materials basis with a not-to-exceed figure of $36,900, plus $350 in
reimbursable costs.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 651-604-4783.
Sincerely,
B<.)~sTR90, R.EJi;iBt>JE, ANDERUK AND ASSOClA TES
~/~~f
Rich Brasch
Project Manager
cc. Lee Mann
Erik Peters
5
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farminlrton.mn.us
/ () /;;
TO:
Mayor, Councihnembers, City Administrator GI
FROM:
Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT:
2007 Projects Discussion
DATE:
February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
Staffwill give a brief presentation outlining the proposed projects for 2007.
BUDGET IMPACT
Budget impacts for the projects have been/will be identified in their respective feasibility reports.
ACTION REQUESTED
This item is for informational purposes.
Respectfully Submitted,
'id- IV\ ~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
/CJG
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator
FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Trunk Highway 3 Roundabout Project Expert Peer Review
DATE: February 5, 2007
INTRODUCTION
The City of Farmington, together with Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnlDOT), Newland
Communities, Dakota County and Empire Township is planning to construct a roundabout at the
future intersection of Trunk Highway (TH) 3 and County Road (CR) 64.
Because the roundabout is located within the right-of-way for TH 3, the construction documents will
have to follow MnlDOT's development guidelines. MnlDOT currently requires the layout for
roundabouts to be reviewed by an expert peer reviewer selected from their Certified List Program for
Multi-Lane Roundabouts.
MnlDOT has agreed to participate in the cost of the peer reviewer. Their participation will need to be
delineated in a Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Farmington and Mn/DOT.
DISCUSSION
To generate the Joint Powers Agreement, Farmington will need to contract for engineering services
for the Expert Peer Review. A request for quotations will be sent to firms on the MnlDOT Certified
List of peer reviewers for Multi-Lane Roundabouts. The quotations will be brought back to the
Council for review and selection.
The anticipated task and schedule for the execution of the Joint Powers Agreement is shown in the
table below.
Task Anticipated
Completion Date
Mn/DOT approves expert peer reviewer contract scope February 5
and deliverables
City sends out solicitation to Consultant(s) February 6
Consultant(s) submit quotations February 27
City selects Consultant for recommendation to March 5
MnlDOT
TH 3 Roundabout Expert Peer Review
February 5, 2007
Page 2
Task Anticipated
Completion Date
City recommends preferred Consultant to Mn/DOT March 6
Mn/DOT completes draft Joint Powers Agreement March 20
City Council executes Joint Powers Agreement and April 2
awards contract to selected Consultant
Mn/DOT executes Joint Powers Agreement April 9
City issues Notice to Proceed to Consultant April 10
BUDGET IMPACT
The anticipated cost for the Expert Peer Review engineering services ranges from $10,000 to
$20,000. Mn/DOT has indicated available funding between $10,000 and $15,000 for these services.
As part of the peer review, Mn/DOT would require a half day Knowledge Transfer Workshop, where
the peer reviewer would present the final proposed design to the State. Mn/DOT would participate in
100% of the cost of this workshop. The remaining peer review costs are proposed to be split 50/50
between Mn/DOT and the City/Newland.
ACTION REQUESTED
For Council's information and discussion.
Respectfully Submitted,
~m~
Lee M. Mann, P .E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
Values Statement
Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services
We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality
services in a highly professional and cost-effective manner.
Fiscal Responsibility
We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is
essential for citizen confidence in government.
Ethics and Integrity
We believe that ethics and integrity are the foundation blocks of public trust and
confidence and that all meaningful relationships are built on these values.
Open and Honest Communication
We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and
involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees.
Cooperation and Teamwork
We believe that the public is best served when departments and employees work
cooperatively as a team rather than at cross purposes.
Visionary Leadership and Planning
We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be visionary and to plan for the future.
Positive Relations with the Community
We believe that positive relations with the community and public we serve leads to
positive, involved, and active citizens.
Professionalism
We believe that continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism and are
committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and the development of our
employees.
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 021021200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page -
COUNCIL MEETING ON FEBRUARY 5, 2007
01/16/2007 - 0210412007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
4 PAWS ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,613.48
STREET MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140.00
1,753.48
ACME AWNING HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 680.00
DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 680.00
1,360.00
AFFINITY PLUS FEDERAL CREDIT U EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CREDIT UNION PAYABLE 4,275.00
4,275.00
AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES INC STREET MAINTENANCE STREET MATERIALS 304.21-
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 445.25
141.04
ALCORN BEVERAGE CO. INC. DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 6,335.55
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 9,182.57
15,518.12
ALL STAR WIRELESS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET MN SALES TAX DUE .97-
PATROL SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 15.96
14.99
ALLSTATE SALES & LEASING CORP. SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 13.72
13.72
ALPHA VIDEO AND AUDIO INC CABLE/COMMUNICATIONS PROJECTS MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 3,350.49
3,350.49
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RETIRE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 140.00
140.00
AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING I FLAGSTAFF AVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,666.30
14,666,30
ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER PATROL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 48.83
48.83
ANDERSEN,GRACE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS RECREATION FEES - SENIOR CTR 39.00
39.00 -J
LP
ANDERSON, GIL SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 45.16
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/02/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 2
01/16/2007 - 0210412007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
45.16
APPLE VALLEY FORD PATROL SERVICES VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 204.41
NATURAL RESOURCES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 30.24-
174.17
ARAGORN INDUSTRIES INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 312.00
312.00
ASPEN MILLS FIRE SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 170.03
170.03
ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 888.25
888.25
AUSTIN, WILLIAM & JACKIE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 24.24
24.24
BALI, BRIAN SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 59.52
59.52
BELLBOY CORPORATION DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,807.42
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,285.44
4,092.86
BERRY COFFEE COMPANY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 66.97
EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND COFFEE FUND 200.93
267.90
BLUE WATER PLUMBING & HEATING GENERAL FUND REVENUES BUILDING PERMITS .50
GENERAL FUND REVENUES PLUMBING & HEATING PERMITS 49.50
50.00
BOERBOOM,ROB INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 34.99
34.99
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLlK INC ENGINEERING SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,150.25
STREET MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 27.00
STREET CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 789.00
ANNUAL SEALCOATING PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,284.98
ASH STREET PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,945.04
MAIN STREET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,708.22
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/021200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 3
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
195TH ST EXTENSION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 84,272.95
208th ST WEST PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,357.63
SPRUCE ST EXTENSION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,000.99
ELM ST RECONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 26,706.83
TH #3 IMP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,292.00
CITY HALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 831,79
STORM WATER TRUNK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,094.46
PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25,595.95
FLAGSTAFF AVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 137,619.53
HILLDEE RECONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,193.74
210TH STREET EAST PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 240.00
MIL & OVERLAY ANNUAL PRJ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,804.99
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,852.47
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,872.69
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,030,68
WELL #8 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,979.95
336,651.14
BRAUN PUMP & CONTROLS SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 99.53
99.53
BRIESACHER, WAYNE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 17.74
17.74
BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO PATROL SERVICES TELEPHONE 270.00
270.00
BURNSVILLE, CITY OF ANNUAL SEALCOATING PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,292.46
1,292.46
BUSH, LORETTA RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160.00
160.00
C G CONSTRUCTION HRA CAPITAL PROJECTS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 2,411.43
2,411,43
CAMPBELL KNUTSON LEGISLATIVE CONTROL LEGAL 2,254.50
ADMINISTRA nON LEGAL 1,788,76
HUMAN RESOURCES LEGAL 175.50
PLANNING & ZONING LEGAL 580.50
POLICE ADMINISTRATION LEGAL 4,885.35
ENGINEERING SERVICES LEGAL 661.50
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02102/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 4
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEGAL 306.00
POLICE FORFEITURES LEGAL 201.78
ASH STREET PROJECT LEGAL 135.00
195TH ST EXTENSION LEGAL 337.50
PRIVATE CAPITAL PROJECTS LEGAL 1,732.50
FLAGSTAFF AVE LEGAL 9,864.00
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR LEGAL 67.50
22,990.39
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPA ELM ST RECONSTRUCTION OTHER 400.00
400.00
CARQUEST BUILDING INSPECTIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 5.18
FIRE SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 2.56
FIRE SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 1.97
RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 67.15
STREET MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 14.97
NATURAL RESOURCES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 139.31
PARK MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 301.08
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 171.90
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS
FLEET OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 576.88
1,281.00
CDW GOVERNMENT INC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.51
90.51
CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT LLC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP BUILDING RENTAL 10,794.85
10,794.85
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC FIRE SERVICES EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 353.00
353.00
CNH CAPITAL STREET MAINTENANCE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 393.42
PARK MAINTENANCE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 417.05
810.47
COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 6,599.35
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 9,546.87
16,146.22
COOK, LOU & LINDA SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 12.84
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 021021200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 5
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
12.84
CORNERSTONEENERGYINC POLICE ADMINISTRATION NATURAL GAS 1,911.55
FIRE SERVICES NATURAL GAS 2,440.93
PARK MAINTENANCE NATURAL GAS 182.60
BUILDING MAINT SERVICES NATURAL GAS 3,384.42
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS NATURAL GAS 348.84
SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS NATURAL GAS 31.71
ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE NATURAL GAS 3,296,40
DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP NATURAL GAS 407.28
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR NATURAL GAS 159.88
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE NATURAL GAS 1,541.50
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS NATURAL GAS 1,532,50
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS NATURAL GAS 306.50
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE NATURAL GAS 1,747.40
17,291.51
DAKOTA COMMUNICATIONS CENTER PATROL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16,794.66
FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,397.34
25,192.00
DAKOTA COUNTY DOMESTIC FIRE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,725.84
1,725.84
DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER COMPANY NATURAL RESOURCES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 2,67
2.67
DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER STREET MAINTENANCE STREET MATERIALS 6,365.00
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE ELECTRIC 87.38
6,452.38
DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER/AUDITO PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 216.37
IMP BONDS 2003A LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 160.65
G.O. REFUNDING BONDS 2004A LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 116.55
GO IMP REFUNDING BONDS 200SA LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 1,855.35
IMPROVEMENT BONDS 2005B LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 916.65
GO IMP BONDS 2006A LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 220.50
REFUNDING BONDS 2004D LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 18.90
SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 235.46
STREET CONSTRUCTION LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 176,40
ANNUAL SEALCOATING PROJECT LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 655.20
195TH ST EXTENSION LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 567.00
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/02/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 6
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
STORM WATER TRUNK LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 833.68
PERM IMPRV REVOLVING FUND LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 204.75
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 62.50
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 756.00
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 75.00
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 62,50
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE LEGAL & FISCAL FEES 664.34
7,797.80
DARTS SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 350.00
350,00
DAY DISTRIBUTING CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 293.25
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,857.80
2,151.05
DELEGARD TOOL CO FLEET OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 381.99
381.99
EAGEN, JOANN SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 44.86
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 44.86
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 44.86
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 44.87
179.45
ECONO FOODS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DEPOSITS PAYABLE 4,642.50
POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 19.24
FIRE SERVICES OUTSIDE PRINTING 22.34
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 3.67
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 60.50
4,748.25
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATI HRAlECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 220.00
220.00
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC GENERAL ACCOUNTING TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 215.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 215.00
430.00
EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 697.28
697,28
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02102/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 7
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 472.05
472.05
EMS LOGCON INC RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 122.50
122.50
FARMINGTON EMPLOYEE CLUB EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE CLUB 138.46
138.46
FARMINGTON INDEPENDENT FIRE SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 33.00
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 33.00
66.00
FARMINGTON PRINTING INC PLANNING & ZONING OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.50
DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OUTSIDE PRINTING 4.15
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OUTSIDE PRINTING 4.16
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 1,211.00
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 1,198,75
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS OUTSIDE PRINTING 1,198.75
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OUTSIDE PRINTING 1,211.00
4,852.31
FARMINGTON VFW RAMBLING RIVER CENTER OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 248.00
248.00
FARMINGTON YOUTH BASKETBALL AS GENERAL FUND REVENUES RECREATION FEES - GENERAL 139.00
139.00
FERRELL GAS PRODUCTS CO ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE FUEL 263.78
263.78
FIRE ENGINEERING FIRE SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 21.00
21,00
FIRE SAFETY USA INC FIRE SERVICES EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 73.90
73.90
FIREHOUSE FIRE SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 30.00
30.00
FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INC CAPITAL ACQUISITION VEHICLES 18,700.00
18,700,00
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/02/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 8
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 2,385.53
POLICE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 1,838,70
PATROL SERVICES TELEPHONE 67.07
ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE TELEPHONE 49.69
DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP TELEPHONE 406.81
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR TELEPHONE 406.80
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE TELEPHONE 496.77
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS TELEPHONE 49.69
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE TELEPHONE 337.81
6,038.87
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF AME DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP TELEPHONE 2.26
2.26
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS-ACCESS POLICE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 143.05
FIRE SERVICES TELEPHONE 143.06
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TELEPHONE 337.23
623.34
GILES PROPERTIES INC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 30,525.82
30,525.82
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 80.47
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 80.48
160.95
GRAINGER INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 69.97
69.97
GRIGGS COOPER & CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 11,774.96
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 14,492.29
26,267.25
GULLA, MIKE SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 59.99
59.99
GUYOT, RYAN RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 76.00
76.00
HAAN, WILLIAM RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 89.00
89.00
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/02/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 9
01/16/2007 - 0210412007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
HANSEN, AMY SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 11.27
11.27
HANSMEIER, TINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 225.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 23.77
248,77
HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE CHEMICALS 35.00
35.00
HEALTH COUNSELING SERVICES RESCUE SQUAD SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 80.00
80.00
HEAL THPARTNERS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,122.28
7,122.28
HElM, MIKE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 143.50
143.50
HEINEN, JOE ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 10,000.00
10,000.00
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FIRE SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 180.00
180.00
HOHENSTEINS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,309.20
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,359.70
2,668.90
HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY WATER UTILITY EXPENSE EQUIP SUPPLIES & PARTS 297.69
297.69
HYDROVAC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,439.18
8,439.18
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND ICMA PAYABLE 10,207,92
10,207.92
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS ADMINISTRATION RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 3,071.89
3,071.89
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/02/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 10
01/16/2007 - 0210412007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PATROL SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 75.00
75.00
JAMES, MARVALENE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS RECREATION FEES - SENIOR CTR 39.00
39.00
JENSEN, SHAWN SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 7.50
7.50
JG WEAR RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 441.38
441.38
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPAN DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 10,357.50
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 15,538.08
25,895.58
KELLER, JORDAN C. RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 51.00
51.00
KELLY ELECTRIC INC POLICE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112.61
112.61
KONZA LAB CONNECTIONS INC HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 40.00
40.00
KUYPER, STEVEN A INVESTIGATION SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 50.37
50.37
KYLE, TIMOTHY SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 28.91
28.91
LAKEVILLE, CITY OF PATROL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,816.35
FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,908.18
14,724.53
LAND'S END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS POLICE ADMINISTRATION UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 30.00
30.00
LASERSHARP INC POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 241.76
241.76
LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND LELS DUES PAYABLE 553.00
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 021021200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 11
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
553.00
LEWIS, KENNETH R BUILDING INSPECTIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 58.19
58.19
LEXISNEXIS INVESTIGATION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150.00
150.00
LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 216.81
216.81
LOCAL GVMT INFO SYSTEMS ASSN. HUMAN RESOURCES DATA PROCESSING 1,102.00
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA PROCESSING 679.13
GENERAL ACCOUNTING DATA PROCESSING 1,829.00
BUILDING INSPECTIONS DATA PROCESSING 1,560.00
POLICE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 360.00
POLICE ADMINISTRATION DATA PROCESSING 5,253.00
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE DATA PROCESSING 374.21
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS DATA PROCESSING 374.21
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS DATA PROCESSING 374.21
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE DATA PROCESSING 374.22
12,279.98
LONE OAK COMPANIES INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE POSTAGE 373.09
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS POSTAGE 373.09
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS POSTAGE 373.09
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE POSTAGE 373.09
1,492.36
M. AMUNDSON LLP DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 169.88
DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 114.40
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 991.83
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 171.90
1,448.01
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE 1,454.27
1,454.27
MARK VII DISTRIBUTORS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,174.14
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 4,334.97
7,509.11
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/021200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 12
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
MARTIN, JUDY ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 570.00
570.00
MAXIMUM VOLTAGE PARK MAINTENANCE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 72.21
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 5.32
FLEET OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 2.65
80.18
MCNEILUS-DODGE CENTER SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 889.87
889.87
METRO CITIES LEGISLATIVE CONTROL SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 5,470.00
5,470.00
METRO GARAGE DOOR CO. POLICE ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 150.53
150.53
METRO PEST MANAGEMENT FIRE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 57.26
57.26
METROCALL INC PATROL SERVICES TELEPHONE 13.40
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 1.88
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE CELLULAR PHONES 1.88
17.16
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE MCES FEES 66,099.61
66,099.61
MINNESOTA AFSCME COUNCIL #5 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND AFSCME UNION DUES PAYABLE 1,557.92
1,557.92
MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOCIATION EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND MBA PAYABLE 108.34
108.34
MINNESOTA COACHES INC RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 325.00
325.00
MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 515.00
515.00
MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 204.48
204.48
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02102/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 13
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 375.00
375.00
MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK AS PARK MAINTENANCE SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 168.00
RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 923.00
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 168.00
ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 168.00
1,427.00
MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF ARBORICUL NATURAL RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 30.00
30.00
MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN 4,123.94
4,123.94
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 2,628.48
2,628.48
MN DEPT OF REVENUE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND GARNISHMENT PAYABLE 784.41
784.41
MN MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOC I HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 625.00
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 366.00
991.00
MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA LIFE INS PAYABLE 66.00
66.00
MN OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNO PATROL SERVICES TELEPHONE 74.00
74.00
MN PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY WASTEWATER TRTMNT BOND 1995 DEBT PRINCIPAL 18,562.72
WASTEWATER TRTMNT BOND 1995 DEBT INTEREST 10,771.24
29,333.96
MOODY COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND CHILD SUPPORT PAYABLE 350.00
350.00
MTI DISTRIBUTING PARK MAINTENANCE TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 125.00
125.00
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/02/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 14
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
MURPHY, JAMES PATROL SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 132.88
132.88
MVTL LABORATORIES INC WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 98.75
98.75
NATIONAL CAMERA & VIDEO FIRE SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 63.87
63.87
NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK ASS PARK MAINTENANCE SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 80.00
RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 545.00
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 80.00
705.00
NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 30.00
PLANNING & ZONING TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 30.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 15.00
DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 143.50
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 143.50
362.00
NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 100.59-
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 119.43
18.84
OFFICE MAX - A BOISE COMPANY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 684.56
684.56
OLSON, JEFF STREET MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 63.99
63.99
ORKIN EXTERMINATING BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16.76
ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 72.22
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.97
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.97
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4.19
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 92.47
227.58
PAPCOINC ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE 108.00
108.00
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02102/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 15
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
PAUSTIS WINE CO. DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 672.98
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,178.48
1,851.46
PEER ENGINEERING INC ELM ST RECONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,380.00
1,380.00
PELLlCCI HARDWARE & RENTAL POLICE ADMINISTRATION OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 83.54
PATROL SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 4.24
87.78
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 5,944.68
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 7,325.77
13,270.45
PIERCE, SANDY POLICE ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 44.00
POLICE ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 19.40
63.40
PINE BEND LANDFILL INC SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 43,716.88
43,716.88
PITNEY BOWES COMMUNICATIONS POSTAGE 2,018.99
2,018.99
POLFUS IMPLEMENT INC. NATURAL RESOURCES VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS 87.04
NATURAL RESOURCES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 85.09
172.13
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA PAYABLE 25,718.77
EMPLOYEE EXPENSE FUND PERA 31,621.57
57,340.34
QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS CO DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 8,121.22
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 9,878.67
17,999.89
R & R SPECIAL TIES OF WISCONSIN ICE ARENA OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 120.75
120.75
RADEMACHER, ZACH FIRE SERVICES BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 39.75
39.75
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/02/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 16
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
REALST AR TITLE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 120.00
120.00
RED WING FRAMING GALLERY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 15.98
15.98
REGINA MEDICAL CENTER POLICE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 79.00
79.00
RESOURCE RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES NATURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 170.50
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 409.42
579.92
RIVERTOWN NEWPAPER GROUP ADMINISTRATION LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 185.75
PLANNING & ZONING LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 63.00
RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATIONS 21.00
DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP ADVERTISING 158.75
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR ADVERTISING 158.75
587.25
ROC INC FIRE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 266.25
BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,977.28
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 225.33
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 225.33
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45.07
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 225.33
2,964.59
ROLOFF, MICHELLE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 7.05
7.05
ROSEMOUNT PARK & RECREATION RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 377.76
377.76
SAUBER PLUMBING & HEATING CO. ASH STREET PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,300.00
ESCROW FUND DEPOSITS PAYABLE 624.00
4,924.00
SAVOIE SUPPLY CO. INC. BUILDING MAINT SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES & PARTS 446.70
446.70
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/021200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 17
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
SCHAD TRACY SIGNS INC PILOT KNOB LIQUOR BUILDING REPAIR SERVICE 447.92
447.92
SCHULTZ, LANCE SEWER OPERATIONS REVENUE ENTERPRISE SALES 145.13
145.13
SCHWlNESS LLC DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP BUILDING RENTAL 4,738.27
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR BUILDING RENTAL 14,492.49
19,230.76
SHADICK, LISA ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.76
ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 9.21
31.97
SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP BUILDING MAINT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 204.69
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 255.87
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 255.87
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 51.17
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 255.87
1,023.47
SPECIALTY WINES AND BEVERAGES DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 359.50
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 192.50
552.00
STATE MECHANICAL INC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 5,600.00
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 12,040.00
17,640.00
STERLING CODIFIERS INC ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00
500.00
STREICHER'S PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 2,305.81
2,305.81
SWEDIN, ROSEMARY SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 18.43
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 18.43
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 18.43
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 18.43
73.72
THREE RIVERS PRK DISTRICT RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES PROGRAMMING EXPENSE 128.00
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO CITY OF FARMINGTON 02/02/200713:26:41
Council Check Summary Page - 18
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Vendor Business Unit Object Amount
128.00
TKDAINC SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 671.41
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 671.41
1,342.82
TOWN'S EDGE CAR CARE BUILDING INSPECTIONS FUEL 48.00
48.00
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC PATROL SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 154.80
154.80
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE FIRE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1.17
1.17
VERCH, TERRY FIRE SERVICES TRAINING & SUBSISTANCE 226.59
FIRE SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 184.30
410.89
VERIZON WIRELESS FIRE SERVICES CELLULAR PHONES 8.26
8.26
VINOCOPIA DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 180.00
180.00
WEIDEMA INC, S.R. HILLDEE RECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 99,839.44
99,839.44
WELCOME FRIENDS FIRE SERVICES OTHER SUPPLIES & PARTS 61.19
61.19
WINE COMPANY, THE DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 72.00
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 144.00
216.00
WINE MERCHANTS DOWNTOWN LIQUOR REV & EXP COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,072.83
PILOT KNOB LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 983.02
2,055.85
WOLD ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS IN CITY HALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,550.15
28,550.15
R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
Vendor
ZEE SERVICE COMPANY
Business Unit
BUILDING MAINT SERVICES
SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSE
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS
STORM WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS
WATER UTILITY EXPENSE
ZWART, BOB
STREET MAINTENANCE
~~~S~ODERBERG
(\;1\~/ FOGARTY
~ MCKNIGHT
1:>P . PRITZLAFF
~ WILSON
CITY OF FARMINGTON
Council Check Summary
01/16/2007 - 02104/2007
Object
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Report T alals
Amount
22.43
28.04
28.04
5.61
28.04
112.16
021021200713:26:41
Page -
19
100.00
100.00
1,149,431.30