Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.17.04 Council Packet City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation. the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promisingfuture. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 17, 2004 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (2/2/04 Regular) b) Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes - Parks and Recreation c) Appointment Recommendation Heritage Preservation Commission - Administration d) On-Sale Liquor License Transfer - Administration e) Capital Outlay Parks - Parks and Recreation f) Capital Outlay Arena - Parks and Recreation g) School and Conference Recreation - Parks and Recreation h) School and Conference Parks - Parks and Recreation i) School and Conference - Police Department j) School and Conference - Community Development k) Adopt Resolution - Ash Street Project - Finance I) Adopt Resolution - Capitalization Policy GASB34 - Finance m) Approve Bills n) Approve Bid for Solid Waste Truck - Parks and Recreation (Supplemental) 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Liquor License Suspension B&B Pizza - Police b) Liquor License Suspension Kwik Trip - Police 9. AWARDOFCONTRACT Action Taken Approved Information Received Approved Approved Information Received Information Received Approved Approved Information Received A(Jproved R13-04 R14-04 Approved R15-04 Suspended March 2&3 Suspended March 2&3 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Accept Final Report Recreational Facilities Task Force - Parks and Recreation 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Main Street Project - Hwy 3 Considerations - Engineering 12. NEW BUSINESS a) Adopt Resolution - East Farmington 8th Addition Preliminary and Final Plat - Community Development b) Spruce Street Commercial Area Design Standards - Community Development c) Title Matters - Duo Plastics, Inc. - Finance 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE a) Schedule Council Workshop 14. ADJOURN Approved Tabled to April 5, 2004 R16-04 Ord 004-506 Approved 1$1 week in April City of Fannington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Mission Statement Through teamwork and cooperation. the City of Farmington provides quality services that preserve our proud past and foster a promising future. AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 17, 2004 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS ~. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments) 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (2/2/04 Regular) b) Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes - Parks and Recreation c) Appointment Recommendation Heritage Preservation Commission - Administration d) On-Sale Liquor License Transfer - Administration e) Capital Outlay Parks - Parks and Recreation f) Capital Outlay Arena - Parks and Recreation g) School and Conference Recreation - Parks and Recreation h) School and Conference Parks - Parks and Recreation i) School and Conference - Police Department j) School and Conference - Community Development k) Adopt Resolution - Ash Street Project - Finance I) Adopt Resolution - Capitalization Policy GASB34 - Finance m) Approve Bills n) Approve Bid for Solid Waste Truck - Parks and Recreation (Supplemental) 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Liquor License Suspension B&B Pizza - Police b) Liquor License Suspension Kwik Trip - Police 9. AWARDOFCONTRACT Action Taken Pages 1-6 Pages 7-9 Pages 10-11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Pages 19-23 Pages 24-28 Page 29 Page 30 Pages 31-38 Pages 39-45 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Accept Final Report Recreational Facilities Task Force - Parks and Recreation Pages 46-72 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Main Street Project - Hwy 3 Considerations - Engineering Pages 73-82 12. NEW BUSINESS a) Adopt Resolution - East Farmington 8th Addition Preliminary and Final Plat - Community Development Pages 83-96 b) Adopt Ordinance - Spruce Street Commercial Area Design Standards - Community Development Pages 97-109 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE a) Schedule Council Workshop 14. ADJOURN City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor & Councilmembers FROM: David Urbia City Administrator SUBJECT: Supplemental Agenda DATE: February 17,2004 It is requested that the February 17,2004 agenda be amended as follows: CONSENT AGENDA 7n) Adopt Resolution- Approving Bid for Solid Waste Truck - Parks and Recreation Award the bid to MacQueen Equipment Inc. in the amount of $174,695.00. Add 12c) Title Matters Duo Plastics Inc. -Community Development Approve Certificate of Completion regarding Contract for Private Sale with Duo Plastics Inc. David Urbia City Administrator 7/} City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator V FROMi: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUB~CT: Resolution Awarding Bid for a New Automated Refuse Packer and Chassis DATE~ February 17, 2004 INTRqDUCTION . On February 12, 2004, sealed bids for a new Solid Waste automated refuse packer and chassis were opened. . DISC SSION Six pac ets were mailed to interested bidders. Two sealed bids were received by the City. The comp$es providing bids for this equipment were as follows: 1. iMacQueen Equipment, Inc. (Peterbuilt Chassis) Total Bid: $174.695.00 2. iMacQueen Equipment, Inc. (Freightliner Chassis) Total Bid: $186.175.00 This sp~cia1ized automated refuse packer equipment is only available from limited suppliers. BUDG~T IMPACT The approved amount for the purchase of the new Solid Waste automated refuse packer and chassisiin the 2004 Capital Outlay budget was $197,025.00. The apparent low bid is in the amount of$174,695.00, which is $22,330.00 under the budgeted amount. ACTI<j)N REOUESTED Approve a resolution that awards the bid to MacQueen Equipment, Inc. in the amount of $174,695.00 for the purchase of a new Solid Waste automated refuse packer and chassis. ~1rW Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director cc: i Benno Klotz, Solid Waste Supervisor RESOLUTION No. AWARDING BID TO MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT FOR AN AUTOMATED REFUSE PACKER AND CHASSIS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 1 ih day of February, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. MembeIts Present: Membe~s Absent: MembeIt introduced and Member seconded the following: WHE~AS, pursuant to properly published notice, bids were received, opened and tabulated, which c()mplied with the advertisement; and WHE~AS, the City Council has received a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Directo~ on the Award for this equipment purchase. NOW, tHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby awards the contract! for the Solid Waste automated refuse packer and chassis to MacQueen Equipment, Inc. in the ailiount of$174,695.00. This resplution adopted by recorded vote ofthe Farmington City Council in open session on the 1 ih day! of February, 2004. Mayor Attesteq to the 1 ih day of February, 2004. City Administrator SEAL /~e City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: /11 v-' Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator l)dAf^J FROM: Robin Roland, Finance Director SUBJECT: Duo Plastics. Inc. - Certificate of Completion DATE: February 17,2004 DISCUSSION City staff members have been informed of an impending sale involving Duo Plastics, Inc., a business that is currently located north of CSAH 50 between Pilot Knob Road and Eaton Avenue. The land and the building will apparently be sold to one party, and the operating equipment will be sold to another party. The purchaser ofthe equipment will then lease space in the building from the new owner. The title work for the upcoming sale has disclosed a Contract for Private Sale that was entered into by Duo Plastics, Inc. and the City of Farmington on or about July 6, 1989. The Contract obligated Duo Plastics, Inc. to construct certain improvements (i.e., a building) upon the real estate that Duo Plastics bought from the City. After the completion of the required improvements, Duo Plastics had (and still has) the right to request that the City provide Duo Plastics with a "Certificate of Completion." An attorney representing Duo Plastics has now requested that the City provide such a Certificate, which is apparently needed in order for a closing on the sale to take place. I have attached a copy of a Certificate that has been prepared in a format acceptable to the City Attorney. My review of the applicable files and records indicates that a proper basis exists for the execution and delivery of the Certificate of Completion. RECOMMENDED ACTION Motion to approve the attached Certificate of Completion regarding the Contract for Private Sale between Duo Plastics, Inc. and the City of Farmington dated July 6, 1989. Respectfully Submitted, !?f//~/ Robin Roland Finance Director CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION WHEREAS, the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, did on the 6th day of July, 1989, enter into a Contract For Private Sale, with Duo Plastics, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, for development of certain lands in the City of Farmington with said lands being legally described as follows, to-wit: PARCEL "A" All that part of the NW Y4 of the NW Y4 of Section 36, Township 114, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the east line of said NW Y4 and the northerly right of way line of the abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, said right of way being shown in Dakota County Recorder's Document No. 570089; thence westerly along the northerly right of way line of said abandoned railroad 400.00 feet; thence northerly parallel with the east line of said NW Y4 of the NW Y4, 400.00 feet; thence easterly parallel with the northerly right of way line of said abandoned railroad, 400.00 feet to the east line of said NW Y4 ofthe NW Y4; thence southerly along the east line of said NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4, 400.00 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL "B" Abandoned railroad right-of-way shown in Dakota County Recorder's Document No. 570089, lying between the east line of said NW Y4 of the NW Y4 and the west line ofthe east 400 feet of said NW Y4 of the NW Y4 of Section 36, Township 114, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota. Said abandoned railroad right-of-way being contiguous with and lying on the south side of Parcel "A" described above; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Contract for Private Sale Duo Plastics, Inc., covenanted and agreed to construct certain improvements on said real property; said improvements being stated and addressed in said Contract For Private Sale; and WHEREAS, upon completion of said improvements as required by said Contract For Private Sale the City of Farmington agreed to issue a Certificate of Completion certifying that Duo Plastics, Inc., has completed construction of said improvements in accordance with the agreed upon plans and improvements to the subject real property, thereby terminating Duo Plastics, Inc.'s obligation in respect to those portions of the Contract For Private Sale pertaining to construction and development of said real property; and 1 WHEREAS, said construction and development by Duo Plastics, Inc., has been completed pursuant to the plans, specifications, terms and conditions as stated in the Contract For Private Sale. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Farmington, Minnesota, hereby states, acknowledges, confirms and certifies as follows: 1. That Duo Plastics, Inc. has constructed upon the above described real property the improvements as agreed to in the Contract For Private Sale between the parties dated the 6th day of July, 1989. 2. That the completion of said construction and improvements is hereby certified to by the City of Farmington, Minnesota. 3. That those parts and portions of the Contract For Private Sale between the parties hereto pertaining to said construction of said improvements are hereby stated, acknowledged, and confirmed to be satisfied and completed. 4. That the issuance of this Certificate of Completion by the City of Farmington does not effect, modify, or terminate the additional and continuing duties, covenants, and obligations of Duo Plastics, Inc., its successors and assigns, as stated in the Contract For Private Sale executed between the City of Farmington and Duo Plastics, Inc., on the 6th day of July, 1989. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald G. Ristow, Mayor By: David M. Urbia, City Administrator 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2004, by Gerald G. Ristow and David M. Urbia, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 3 7CL COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR February 2, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Ristow led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. a) Introduction and Swearing In of City Administrator David Urbia Mayor Ristow administered the Oath of Office to City Administrator Urbia. City Administrator Urbia stated he is looking forward to the opportunity, it is a great community. His family will be moving here February 14,2004. It has been a good first week. It is a great staff and he is looking forwarding to working here and giving it his best effort so good things happen. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Ristow, Cordes, Fitch, Fogarty, Soderberg None Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; David Urbia, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant 4. APPROVE AGENDA Item 9a) Fire Department Tanker Recommendation was pulled due to concerns from the Fire Department. Mayor Ristow pulled item 7a) Council Minutes (1/20/04 Regular) to abstain. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. s. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS a) Recognition - Police Chief Siebenaler Councilmembers Soderberg and Fitch presented Police Chief Siebenaler with a plaque for demonstrating extraordinary leadership, integrity and dedication while serving as Interim City Administrator from July 3,2003 to January 25,2004. Mayor Ristow also thanked him and the staff and employees for non-interruption of work and carrying on. He very much appreciated everyone's integrity in doing a wonderful job and carrying on. Councilmember Fogarty stated carrying on is not just what Police Chief Siebenaler has done. He has charged us forward. His professionalism is amazing. Council Minutes (Regular) February 2, 2004 Page 2 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes approving Council Minutes (1120/04 Regular). Voting for: Cordes, Fitch, Fogarty, Soderberg. Abstain: Ristow. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fogarty to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: b) Appointed Responsible Authority for Data Practices - Administration c) Approved Appointment Recommendation Rambling River Center Advisory Board - Administration d) Approved Appointment Recommendation Public Works - Human Resources e) Adopted RESOLUTION R8-04 Accept Donation Rambling River Center- Parks and Recreation f) Approved Traffic Control- English Avenue and 203rd Street - Engineering g) Received Information School and Conference - Fire Department h) Received Information School and Conference - Fire Department i) Received Information School and Conference - Fire Department j) Received Information Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation k) Approved Bills APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT a) Fire Department Tanker Recommendation - Fire Department This item was pulled from the agenda. 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Liquor License Violations - Suspension of License - Police Department The Police Department has conducted compliance checks at licensed liquor retailers. One was conducted in December and there were four failures. Two were first time offenses and were issued civil penalties of $400 each. Two additional failures were 2nd time failures. According to ordinance their license can be suspended or revoked as the city sees fit. Staff is recommending a public hearing be set for suspension of liquor licenses for B&B Pizza and K wik Trip. The recommended suspension would be for two days. Staff will notify management of both establishments. The public hearing will be held February 17, 2004. MOTION by Cordes, second by Fitch to set a public hearing for February 17,2004 for the purpose of suspending the liquor license ofB&B Pizza and the liquor license of Kwik Trip. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Council Minutes (Regular) February 2,2004 Page 3 b) Adopt Resolution - Authorizing ALF Ambulance to Purchase Specified Ambulance Equipment and Issue Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness - Finance The ALF Ambulance Board is asking the city to include with our Certificates of Indebtedness $145,000 for their equipment which they would purchase. As a member of the ALF Joint Powers agreement, the city has this capability. The ALF Board approved a resolution for the sale of bonds, however each individual City Council must agree under a joint resolution to the ALF Board resolution. ALF will pay back the $145,000 in less than a year. This is the first time ALF has had to issue a Certificate of Indebtedness, which has to do with the ability of cities to levy. Farmington was chosen due to a timing issue, as Farmington was ready to issue Certificates of Indebtedness. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fogarty to adopt RESOLUTION R9-04 authorizing ALF Ambulance Service to purchase specified ambulance equipment and to issue equipment certificates of indebtedness. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Adopt Resolution - Call for Sale of Refunding Bonds - Finance There are two bond issues, one is the improvement bonds of 1996 which financed the infrastructure in the industrial park phase two. The other are G.O. sanitary sewer revenue bonds of 1998 which financed the Middle Creek sanitary sewer project, which expanded the trunk sewer line into the area east of Pilot Knob and north ofHwy 50, and to replace a lift station for that area. The bonds would be sold on March 1, and brought to Council at that meeting. A savings of over $164,000 is expected over the next 11 years. MOTION by Fitch, second by Soderberg adopting RESOLUTION RIO-04 calling for the sale of$2,535,OOO G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2004D on March 1,2004. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. d) Adopt Resolution - Call for Sale of Certificates of Indebtedness - Finance Staff proposed the sale of $1.48 million in Certificates of Indebtedness. These certificates will pay for the acquisition of equipment as proposed in the 2004 budget. $145,000 ofthis will be funded by ALF Ambulance. The certificates will be sold on March 1, 2004. The certificates will be five year notes. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Cordes adopting RESOLUTION Rll-04 calling for the sale of$I,480,000 G.O. Equipment Certificates, Series 2004C on March 1,2004. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. e) Presentation of New Park Sign Design - Parks and Recreation Staff is proposing a new park sign design. There are many new parks that do not currently have park signs. The sign will be 3 ft x 5 ft and attached to two 6"x 6" posts. In addition, staff presented a trail entrance sign. This is a single post sign and will be 30" x 18". The detail will be the same as the park sign. There will be landscaping around the signs to add color to park entrances and to deter vandalism. Installation will begin this summer by staff. The signs will be purchased over a 3 year period, 6 signs each year. The cost of the large park sign will be $2,200, and the smaller entrance sign will cost $625. The signs have a Council Minutes (Regular) February 2, 2004 Page 4 lifetime warranty. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fogarty approving the purchase and installation of the new park signs. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. f) Consider Ash Street Project Phasing - Engineering There are utilities that need to be brought in from the East Farmington area to the area behind the commercial properties in Castle Rock along Hwy 50 and up to the intersection of Ash Street and TH3. The utilities would then be brought in westerly along Ash Street as part of the Ash Street reconstruction project. Staff proposed to do the project in two phases. The utility portion would start this fall and be completed before the reconstruction of Ash Street. This would allow as much time as possible in 2005 to get the road as far along as possible to impact the traffic to the Dakota County Fair as little as possible. Staffhas talked with property owners most affected and they do not have any issue with this phasing. Other property owners will also be contacted. Staffhas also informed the Castle Rock Town Board Chair, and he did not have any issues with this. MOTION by Fogarty, second by Soderberg approving the implementation ofthe Ash Street project in two phases. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS a) Adopt Resolution - 2004 Seal Coat Project Feasibility Report - Engineering This is the 11 th project in the city's seal coat program established in 1994. This program is implemented in a seven-year cycle. The streets are in Autumn Glen 1 st and 2nd Additions, Charleswood 3rd Addition, East Farmington 7th Addition and Tamarack Ridge 1 st and 2nd Additions are to be seal coated for the first time this year. The streets in Prairie Creek I st and 2nd Additions, Silver Springs 1 st and 2nd Additions, Nelsen Hills 1st and 2nd Additions, Fair Hills, Pine Knoll, 213th Street and the Rambling River parking lots are also scheduled to be seal coated. Several streets have already been assessed through their development contracts. Property owners on the remaining streets would be assessed per policy, the remainder of the cost would be funded through the road and bridge fund. Staffhas been in contact with the City of Bumsville, which is the adininistrator for the Joint Powers Agreement for seal coating, traffic markings and other items for street repair. A higher quality aggregate will be used at a cheaper price through the Joint Powers Agreement. The project cost under the previous method is $140,000 or $137,700 using the Joint Powers Agreement costs. The assessed amount under the previous method is $66.77 /residential unit or $65.44/residential unit under the Joint Powers Agreement. The Joint Powers Agreement saves $2800 in project costs. Under this process the Council will have the bid information prior to the public hearing. A neighborhood meeting will be held to answer any questions. Regarding clean-up and removal of unused material, each city inspects their own area. MOTION by Cordes, second by Fitch adopting RESOLUTION R12-04 receiving the feasibility report, authorizing the preparation of plans and Council Minutes (Regular) February 2, 2004 Page 5 specifications and scheduling a public hearing for March 1,2004. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. b) Approve Storm Water Pond Expansion Main Street Project-Engineering The Main Street project phase 2 is scheduled for this summer. Storm sewer will be installed along Main Street for the first time. The storm water is being routed through some pipes along Hwy 3 and outlet to the pond behind the old Wausau property, now Dakota Storage. The pond needs to be expanded in order to take the water from Main Street and to achieve water quality goals. It is not a water quantity issue or a flooding issue, it is an issue of getting the water clean before it continues on to the Prairie Waterway. The expansion would be .45 additional acres, part of which is land already owned by the city. Staffhas discussed the issue with Dakota Storage, and will continue to do so. The estimated project cost is $230,000 not including the easement acquisition. The money would come from trunk sewer funds and costs would not be assessed to property owners. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes approving the expansion of pond PW- P1.14 in conjunction with the Main Street Project, Phase 2. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Councilmember Fitch: He received a couple complaints about snow plowing in cul-de-sacs. Some residents asked if there was a way to make a pass so people can get out. They were quite full of snow and for quite some time. City Engineer Mann replied an alternator went out on the piece of equipment used to plow cul-de-sacs. That would be the issue with the amount of time to get them done. He was not aware what time cul- de-sacs were looked at, but priority routes are done first. Staff will review the comments and do their best, but for this instance, it was due to having a piece of equipment down. City Administrator Urbia: Stated he is very happy to be here and looking forward to working here. Dakota Electric has their annual Partners in Progress Meeting, March 3, 2004, 4:30 - 6:30 in Eagan, at Royal Cliff. He asked others to attend to have a good representation for Farmington. 14. ADJOURN MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg to adjourn at 7:49 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, ~'~/'7 r )Y7~~ ~.._A-~ v Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant 76 DRAFT Farmington Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes from the Regular Meeting on January 14, 2004 Member's Present: Randy Oswald, Dawn Johnson, Buringa (arrived at 6:08 p.m.), Paula Higgins and Debra Ruth Member's Absent: None Other's Present: Senior Coordinator, Missie Kohlbeck; Rambling River Center Advisory Board member Charlie Weber; and Parks and Recreation Director, Randy Distad I. Call To Order Chair Oswald called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. Quorum was present. II. Introduction of New PRAC Member Robin Hanson was introduced as the incoming new member to the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission. Ms. Hanson will begin her term officially in February. She will be replacing Debra Ruth who decided not to seek reappointment. Ms. Hanson provided some brief background information about herself. Debra Ruth was recognized with a plaque commemorating her two years of service to the PRAC. III. Approval of Agenda. Motion by Ruth and seconded by Higgins to approve the Agenda as written. APIF'. Motion approved. IV. Approval of Minutes. Motion by Higgins and seconded by Johnson to approve the December 10, 2003 meeting minutes as written. APIF'. Motion approved. V. Presentations A. Rambling River Center's Fitness Room Equipment and Fees Senior Coordinator Missie Kohlbeck and Rambling River Center Advisory Board member Charlie Weber presented background information about fitness equipment and other senior center fitness rooms that other communities have created. Mr. Weber presented information about the type of fitness equipment that the Rambling River Center Advisory Board is recommending to purchase for its fitness room. Ms. Kohlbeck explained what types of medical and release forms that other communities use for their fitness rooms. She also presented information about the hours that the Rambling River Center Advisory Board recommended that the fitness room would be open to the public. The fitness room hours would include regular weekday hours that the Rambling River Center (RRC) is open and two evenings a week on Tuesday and Thursday evenings. The evening hours would be staffed by a volunteer. It would not be open on weekends. Ms. Kohlbeck informed the PRAC that there would be a separate fee for the fitness room from the regular RRC membership but that in order to be a member of the fitness room, a RRC membership was required. Parks and Recreation Director Distad stated that while he had thought that there was funding available in the 2004 Capital Outlay budget for the fitness equipment, after some research he discovered that the funding was not shown in the 2004 Capital Outlay budget. There was however funding identified in the 2005 requested Capital Outlay budget for the RRC. Distad stated that he is researching other funding options for the purchase of the fitness equipment this year. Motion by Buringa and seconded by Higgins to recommend to the City Council the purchase of new fitness equipment and the fitness room fee structure. APIF'. Motion approved. VI. Old Business A. Recreational Facility Task Force Director Distad updated PRAC on the status of the Recreational Facility Task Force's Final Report to the City Council. He stated that it would come to the February 2004 PRAC meeting for review and then forwarded to the City Council for their review and acceptance. He stated that currently a draft final report was sent to Task Force members for their review and comments. These comments then would be incorporated into the report that the PRAC members would see in February. B. Meadowview Park Master Plan Director Distad informed PRAC members that the Meadowview Park Master Plan was approved by the City Council at its January 5, 2004 meeting by a 3-2 vote. The plan that was approved was the plan that the PRAC had forwarded to the City Council. C. Trail Master Plan Director Distad stated that the Trail Master Plan that was forwarded to the City Council was also approved at the January 5, 2004 meeting. He commented that it was favorably received by the City Council. D. Agreement with Farmington Youth Hockey Association Director Distad commented that the City Attorney has recommended that the City Council be contacted for direction on an Agreement with FYHA concerning the repaying of the costs associated with the sanitary sewer line that was installed to the warming house. The City Attorney felt that the City Council should be informed early on in this process so that they are not surprised later with an Agreement. He informed PRAC members that he will update them on the status ofthe agreement at the February 2004 meeting. E. Dakota County Regional Park Director Distad informed PRAC members that the Dakota County Commissioners unanimously approved the request to master plan the area in Empire Township that has been identified as a potential future regional park area. This is good news for the City of Farmington as it will provide a large regional park within three miles from downtown Farmington. F. Riverbend Development Final Plat Director Distad reviewed with PRAC members some changes that have been made to the final plat of the Riverbend Development. He showed some new trail alignments and also the opportunity to add a parking lot to the park. He stated that this park could become a trail head for the North Creek Greenway and so adding the parking lot when the development is graded and streets and utilities are constructed would be a good idea rather than waiting until after homes are built. He thought that once homes are built, the likelihood of putting a parking lot in the park would be very slim due to the possibility of opposition from homeowners. PRAC members by consensus agreed that the changes to the plat were appropriate. VII. New Business A. Discussion on 2004 Chair Position Chair Oswald thanked PRAC members for allowing him to serve this past year as the chair of the PRAC. He shared with PRAC members that he would be interested in continuing to be chair in 2004. B. Park Master Plan and Park Development Schedule Director Distad provided information to Commission members about a park planning and park development schedule for existing, new and future parks. The schedule identifies about three to four parks a year that would receive either new or updated master planning. These parks then would receive improvements the following year that were identified during the master planning process. Motion by Higgins and seconded by Johnson to recommend to the City Council the approval of the park master planning and park development schedule. APIF. Motion approved. C. Rambling River Park Discussion PRAC members discussed what the future held for Rambling River Park. Director Distad stated that in the park planning and park development schedule, Rambling River Park would have a park master plan completed in 2004. He stated that he thought that the future direction of this park could be determined during the park master planning process. D. Review City Aerial Map to Determine Future Park and Open Space Locations PRAC members reviewed a map that Director Distad had worked with the Assistant City Planner on developing. On the map, future park areas of various sizes were identified. After some discussion about the location and size of future parks, PRAC members by consensus requested Director Distad to come back to a future meeting with a park map that identified for every 640 acres at least 40 acres for a community park and at least two neighborhood parks that are at least five acres in size. VIII. Additions to the Agenda (None) IX. Staff Report (None) X. February Meeting Agenda Topics The following items were identified for the February 2004 meeting agenda: . Review Future Park and Open Space Plan . Review Recreational Facility Task Force Final Report . Election of Officers . Updates on Past Projects . Farmington Lion's Club Request XI. Adjournment Motion by Ruth and seconded by Higgins to adjourn the meeting. APIF. Motion approved. Meeting adjourned at 8:08 p.m. Respectfully Submitted Randy Distad, CPRP Parks and Recreation Director and Recording Secretary 7~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator/;~ FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Approve Appointment - Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: February 17,2004 INTRODUCTION A vacancy exists on the Heritage Preservation Commission. The term for this appointment is from February 1,2002 through January 31,2005. DISCUSSION At a special meeting on January 3, 2004, the City Council conducted interviews for various boards and commissions appointments. Due to a lack of applications at that time, one term on the Heritage Preservation Commission remained unfilled at the conclusion of the interviews. Since then an application has been received for appointment to the Heritage Preservation Commission. Attached is an application submitted by Mr. Nathan Estep requesting appointment to the Heritage Preservation Commission. Upon review of Mr. Estep's application, if Council agrees to make the appointment it will be ratified by approving this item on the consent agenda. If Council wishes to interview Mr. Estep, this item may be pulled from the agenda and staff will proceed in that direction. ACTION REOUIRED Approve the appointment of Mr. Nathan Estep to the Heritage Preservation Commission to complete the remainder of the term from 2/1/02 through 1/31/05. Respectfully submitted, ~t1~~ Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director CITY OF FARMINGTON APPLICATION FOR BOARD OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT Name ~.fA11 A/tJt'l. E$/-tiJ Date of Application 03 [,60'1 I Address !'Jo; Jo6JP. II-. w,5r Daytime Phone # 95"J~ jJ7 - 5'"'1/1 EmployedBy 6xrlt$~ ~W't.f5,' 71/G. . BoardorCommissionyouwishtoserveon ;k/.-fj e PrISt!' v~ -11" '1 . IoM.I'1(fs/ot"J Qualifications (Cover pertinent educational background.. employment positions and other experience on committees, boards, commissions and church organizations, etc.) 115+t/$ !t(.f;/"'4f~ jll LJ.5(Af;/7 - ;'1"1,'$,, ~ t. alA/vJ(I) wi.f4 i-fl-,''/c. /.i-. ') Iv/lld-ty,. I.",,,, &l (}foAoS..1 ~J )'''''1-/- I I {<>""t"y [;](f'cI<; ~v1k 8th" fKl'H tJ;-(-.r (or Wi5CoI1!";/1 Cj"'It.Vl /"'f'J"I."'1~' Wf i-rf/l ~ r .fIt. /J 4,. 1/'141 ((IV;"'" ~ .. / I . ~}~f5 / J (.,J4~_ &t toV,,'k-, C4",/ (t!JIlI/;{",fc -!-{e "",fro !6/;f.r7 ~,<, I:A.4... e?"j~ I il-;J vi/-. / h, '''7<!;Z'- 'II ~ e .+~ A;51o, ,e.., ( (/-Jv~ ~/1 f4~;, I (y wI- t .,I... tIt- "'). {.o ten. fir t-4< /"svlf .,J ;:Iv IlL . References (list any references you wish that would be familiar with your qualifications for the position). ;:(~ A;I/t/$() t') 't (:J . 1) '7. )o&t 6 ch,;, ,1'1/://1-1 . ;;,0 - ~J{~ - 1J<t ~ Chujl B'1f111t1/'1 J..jo5-1Jo-t3J/ SignaroreJ.Ii 4ffp D,'(tI&for;f f,().dPf../~, EX/fi's! ~r,'/lf$ I' I ~~'1e.I, f)",:h)" 5'f,.f~s A"I r;wce I //;1~ fei()()/ "t.c.hl.1 .J ~()qe;~ / Date /)) hi p~1 7d City of Farmington 325. Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrato?~ FROM: Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Approve "On Sale" Liquor and Sunday Liquor License Transfers DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION La Margarita Restaurant, is requesting the "On Sale" Liquor and Sunday Liquor licenses be transferred from the current Operating Officer ofthe premises, Mr. Carlos Carrillo, to Mr. Maurico Giffimi. DISCUSSION La Margarita Restaurant is located at 953 8th Street. The appropriate forms, fees and insurance information have been submitted with the applications. The Police Department has reviewed the forms and approved the applications for issuance. BUDGET IMPACT The fees collected are in accordance with the fee schedule. ACTION REOUESTED Approve transfer of the "On Sale" Liquor and Sunday Liquor licenses to La Margarita Restaurant naming Mr. Maurico Giffimi as Operating Officer of the premises. Respectfully submitted, ~Kdka~ Lisa Shadick Administrative Services Director 7e City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us f\ /~J'.-r-- TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrato/ FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Capital Outlay DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION The City's approved 2004 Capital Outlay Budget identified funding for equipment to be purchased including a tractor, sprayer, 4x4 truck and gator. DISCUSSION The equipment to be purchased will be used for daily park maintenance tasks including mowing parks and right of ways, eradicating weeds in parks and right of ways, hauling equipment and materials and snow removal including salting and sanding oftrails and sidewalks. BUDGET IMPACT The 2004 Capital Outlay Budget included funding for a tractor, sprayer, 4x4 truck and gator. ACTION REQUESTED This item is for informational purposes only. R~.... s ectfully s7Ef;umitt~d 7 r''''/ 0_ 7\(JA1~ Ranay Distatl, Parks and Recreation Director cc: Don Hayes City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us '7f r-/. TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City AdministratorPV FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Arena Capital Outlay DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION Over the past several years, several sections of the Arena dasher boards and gates have been replaced through funding in the Capital Outlay budget. DISCUSSION Staff solicited quotes from three vendors for the purchase and installation of three dasher board panels, one gate and tempered glass for the panels and gate. Work on this project will occur sometime after the ice season has completed in late March. These are the last panels that need to be replaced as part of the process of updating the dasher board system at the arena. BUDGET IMPACT The low quote received to purchase and install the new sections of dasher board and a gate was submitted by Becker Arena Products, Inc. for $10,000.00. The 2004 Capital Outlay budget identified $12,000.00 for the purchase and installatioIJ of the dasher board sections, gate and tempered glass. ACTION REQUESTED No action is requested. This is for informational purposes only. ~yu Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director cc: Dwight Bjerke City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.d.farmington.mn.us o TO: /l. /.- Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator (/. FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: School and Conference DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION The Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRP A) sponsors an annual aquatic conference. DISCUSSION Patti Norman, Recreation Supervisor is responsible for the City's outdoor pool operations including the hiring and training of lifeguards and water safety instructors. A request is being made to allow Ms. Norman to attend the MRP A Annual Aquatic Conference, which will be held in Eagan, Minnesota on February 25 and 26,2004. This conference provides premier educational sessions to professionals who work in aquatics. BUDGET IMPACT The MRPA Annual Aquatic Conference's registration fee is $185.00. Funding was identified in the 2004 Swimming Pool budget to attend this conference ACTION REQUESTED By motion, approve this request. -0'~ful~~ ~istad, Parks and Recreation Director 7,? City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator!1' .r-- FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: School and Conference DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION The National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) sponsors a National Playground Safety Institute (NPSI). DISCUSSION Every three years, the NRP A sponsors a course on playground safety in Minnesota. The course this year will be held at the Como Lakeside Pavillion in St. Paul, Minnesota on March 24-26. Course content includes identifying playground equipment hazards, standards and guidelines associated with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), safety surfacing, risk management and design safety. Playground information is presented the first two days of the course and an exam is administered on the third day. Continental breakfasts, lunches and snacks on the first two days and a continental breakfast on the third day are included in the registration fee. A request is being made to send Dan Thielbar, Parks Maintenance Worker to this course in order for him to become trained and certified on playground equipment safety. Mr. Thielbar will then share with other Parks Maintenance staff the information that he learns from this playground safety course. The goal of having Mr. Thielbar attendJhe course is so that the City has a certified playground safety inspector that is able to thoroughly understand and inspect playground equipment for hazards and compliance with federal and state standards and guidelines. BUDGET IMPACT The NRPA's NPSI registration fee is $340.00. A<iditionally, there is a fee of$100.00 for Mr. Thie1bar to take an exam to become a Certified Playground Safety Inspector. Funding will come from the Parks Maintenance's 2004 budget. ACTION REQUESTED By motion, approve this request. Yj2ectfilllY w;:P R:.m':!JlAd, Parks and Recreation Director ~' City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Councilmembers City Administrator jYV-- FROM: Daniel M. Siebenaler, Police Chief SUBJECT: School and Conference DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION / DISCUSSION The Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association will be sponsoring its 2004 Executive Training Institute from April 19-22 in St Cloud. The Executive Training Institute presents a wide variety of classes pertinent to the position of Police Chief. In addition to the valuable training opportunity, the ETI is the single largest Law Enforcement Trade-Show anywhere in the Central United States. The trade show allows chiefs to see and test the latest in law enforcement equipment and technology. This timely opportunity allows staff to prepare its annual budget requests with a high level of accuracy. BUDGET IMPACT The Executive Training Institute is funded in the 2004 annual budget. Authorization at this time will allow a discounted "Early bird" registration at substantial savings. ACTION REQUESTED Information only. Respectfully submitted, ("'-YJJ. ~~~~ '-.-.t.--- .- ..'.-..( Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7, o TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator!JI-/ FROM: Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director SUBJECT: School and Conference DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION The American Planning Association [APA] annually sponsors a "National Planning Conference." This year's Conference will be held in Washington, D.C. between Saturday, April 24th and Wednesday, Apri12Sth. DISCUSSION National conferences provide a much wider range of educational opportunities than are typically available at a local or regional conference. At this year's conference, for example, participants can choose from over 200 separate educational sessions, and more than 70 "mobile workshops" that take conference participants to nearby sites that demonstrate various aspects of effective land use planning, suburban development, commercial and retail growth, etc. No Farmington City Council meetings, Planning Commission meetings, or HRA meetings are currently s~heduled to be held between Monday, April 26th and Wednesday, April2Sth. BUDGET IMPACT The 2004 budget provides adequate funding for this request. ACTION REOUESTED Approve school and conference request to attend the APA's National Planning Conference. / Ke Carroll Community Development Director 7k City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator/];1./, .--- FROM: Robin Roland, Finance Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution - Ash Street Project - Finance DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION In order to finance the costs of the Ash Street Project, the City will sell bonds in 2005. These bonds, when issued, will reimburse expenditures incurred in 2004. Under the Internal Revenue Code, a declaration of this intent is required. DISCUSSION At their meeting on February 2, 2004, Council authorized the Ash Street project be broken into two phases, with phase one beginning in late summer 2004. The initial phase of the project will be primarily utility construction and it is the City's intention to draw on available internal funding and issue bonds for the project in 2005. However, under Internal Revenue Section 1.150-2 of Income Tax Regulations, if the possibility exists that the City will reimburse itself for expenses incurred prior to the bonds being issued, a resolution declaring that intent must be passed by the City Council. ACTION REOUIRED Adopt the attached resolution establishing compliance with Reimbursement Bond regulations under IRS Code. Respectfully submitted, d/~dq ~~I-z Finance Director RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES RELATING TO COMPLIANCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Farmington, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: 1. Recitals. (a) The Internal Revenue Service has issued Treasury Regulations, Section 1.150-2 (as the same may be amended or supplemented, the "Regulations"), dealing with "reimbursement bond" proceeds, being proceeds of the City's bonds used to reimburse the City for any project expenditure paid by the City prior to the time of the issuance of those bonds. (b) The Regulations generally require that the City make a declaration of intent to reimburse itself for such prior expenditures out of the proceeds of subsequently issued bonds, that such declaration be made not later than 60 days after the expenditure is actually paid, and that the bonding occur and the written reimbursement allocation be made from the proceeds of such bonds within 18 months after the later of (1) the date of payment of the expenditure or (2) the date the project is placed in service (but in no event more than 3 years after actual payment). (c) The City heretofore implemented procedures for compliance with the predecessor versions of the Regulations and desires to amend and supplement those procedures to ensure compliance with the Regulations. (d) The City's bond counsel has advised the City that the Regulations do not apply, and hence the provisions of this Resolution are intended to have no application to payments of City project costs first made by the City out of the proceeds of bonds issued prior to the date of such payments. 2. Official Intent Declaration. The Regulations, in the situations in which they apply, require the City to have declared an official intent (the "Declaration") to reimburse itself for previously paid project expenditures out of the proceeds of subsequently issued bonds. The Council hereby authorizes the City Finance Director to make the City's Declarations or to delegate from time to time that responsibility to other appropriate City employees. Each Declaration shall comply with the requirements of the Regulations, including without limitation the following: (a) Each Declaration shall be made not later than 60 days after payment of the applicable project cost and shall state that the City reasonably expects to reimburse itself for the expenditure out of the proceeds of a bond issue or similar borrowing. Each Declaration may be made substantially in the form of the Exhibit A, which is attached to and made a part of this Resolution, or in any other format which may at the time comply with the Regulations. (b) Each Declaration shall (1) contain a reasonably accurate description of the "project," as defmed in the Regulations (which may include the property or program to be financed, as applicable), to which the expenditure relates and (2) state the maximum principal amount of bonding expected to be issued for that project. (c) Care shall be taken so that the City, or its authorized representatives under this Resolution, not make Declarations in cases where the City does not reasonably expect to issue reimbursement bonds to finance the subject project costs, and the City officials are hereby authorized to consult with bond counsel to the City concerning the requirements of the Regulations and their application in particular circumstances. (d) The Council shall be advised from time to time on the desirability and timing of the issuance of reimbursement bonds relating to project expenditures for which the City has made Declarations. 3. Reimbursement Allocations. The designated City officials shall also be responsible for making the "reimbursement allocations" described in the Regulations, being generally written allocations that evidence the City's use of the applicable bond proceeds to reimburse the original expenditures. 4. Effect. This Resolution shall amend and supplement all prior resolutions and/or procedures adopted by the City for compliance with the Regulations (or their predecessor versions), and, henceforth, in the event of any inconsistency, the provisions of this Resolution shall apply and govern. Adopted this _ day of , by the City Council. 916757.01 2 EXHIBIT A Declaration of Official Intent The undersigned, being the duly appointed and acting City Finance Director of the City of Farmington, Minnesota (the "City"), pursuant to and for purposes of compliance with Treasury Regulations, Section 1.150-2 (the "Regulations"), under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, hereby states and certifies on behalf of the City as follows: 1. The undersigned has been and is on the date hereof duly authorized by the City Council to make and execute this Declaration of Official Intent (the "Declaration") for and on behalf of the City. 2. This Declaration relates to the following project, property or program (the "Project") and the costs thereof to be financed: Ash Street Phases 1 & 2 $6,604,950 3. The City reasonably expects to reimburse itself for the payment of certain costs of the Project out of the proceeds of a bond issue or similar borrowing (the "Bonds") to be issued by the City after the date of payment of such costs. As of the date hereof, the City reasonably expects that $3,000,000 is the maximum principal amount of the Bonds which will be issued to finance the Project. 4. Each expenditure to be reimbursed from the Bonds is or will be a capital expenditure or a cost of issuance, or any of the other types of expenditures described in Section 1.150-2( d)(3) of the Regulations. 5. As of the date hereof, the statements and expectations contained in this Declaration are believed to be reasonable and accurate. Date: City City of Farmington, Minnesota A-I CERTIFICATION The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Finance Director of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, hereby certifies the following: The foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Resolution on file and of official, publicly available record in the offices of the City, which Resolution relates to procedures of the City for compliance with certain IRS Regulations on reimbursement bonds. Said Resolution was duly adopted by the governing body of the City (the "Council") at a regular or special meeting of the Council held on February 17,2004. Said meeting was duly called, regularly held, open to the public, and held at the place at which meetings of the Council are regularly held. Council Member moved the adoption of the Resolution, which motion was seconded by Council Member . A vote being taken on the motion, the following members of the Council voted in favor of the motion to adopt the Resolution: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. The Resolution is in full force and effect and no action has been taken by the Council which would in any way alter or amend the Resolution. WITNESS MY HAND officially as the City Minnesota, this _ day of of the City of Farmington, City City of Farmington, Minnesota 916757.01 7L City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: FA Vi ~v Mayor, Council Members, City Administrat~/J " FROM: Robin Roland, Finance Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Capitalization Policy - Finance DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION For the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended December 31, 2003, the City must implement Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement 34 in conformance with State reporting requirements. One of the components of GASB 34 is the complete accounting for and depreciation of all city assets, including infrastructure. A formal capitalization policy must therefore be adopted by the City Council outlining intent and procedures for all city assets. DISCUSSION The Capitalization Policy attached to this memo outlines the procedures to be followed when accounting for the acquisition, depreciation and disposal of assets by the City. The policy addresses the level at which assets are capitalized, how they are to be depreciated over their useful life and what useful life is expected of each category of asset. The City has accounted for its assets in Enterprise Funds with a capitalization threshold of $1,000 and a useful life and depreciation schedule similar to the one in the policy since the early 1990's. The formal adoption ofthe policy would extend the threshold to $5,000 and apply the policy to all City assets effective with the 2003 Audit. ACTION REQUIRED Adopt the attached Capitalization Policy effective for years ended December 31, 2003 and after. . ~ R~espe t.full~bmitted, ~:::/r!-c! Robin Roland Finance Director CITY OF FARMINGTON CAPITALIZATION POLICY This policy defines dollar thresholds and descriptions for categories of capital assets for all Departments of the City. CaDital Assets Definition Capital assets include land, buildings, building improvements, construction in progress, machinery and equipment, vehicles, infrastructure and easements acquired by the City for use in providing services to its citizens. A capital asset is to be reported and depreciated in government-wide financial statements. In the government-wide financial statements, assets that are not capitalized are expended in the year of acquisition. Infrastructure assets are long-lived capital assets that normally can be preserved for a significant greater number of years than most capital assets and are normally stationary in nature. Examples include roads, bridges, tunnels, drainage systems, water and sewer systems, and dams. Infrastructure assets do not include buildings, drives, parking lots or any other examples given above that are incidental to property or access to the property. Inventory Record The City shall inventory all capital assets. Each inventory record should include: description, year of acquisition, method of acquisition (e.g. purchase, donation, etc.) funding source, cost or estimated cost, and estimated useful life. The inventory record will also identify the function(s) that use the asset. Recordin2 Land Land is to be capitalized but not depreciated. It is recorded at historical cost and remains at that cost until disposal. If there is a gain or loss on the sale ofland, it is reported as a special item in the statement of activities. Recordin2 Buildin2s Buildings should be recorded at either their acquisition cost or construction cost. The cost of new construction should be carefully evaluated because projects usually consist of major components such as land, land improvements, building construction (including professional fees and permits), furniture, fixtures and equipment. In addition, buildings include components such as roof, air conditioner system, etc that should be recorded separately when significant because these building components have different useful lives. The value of each component needs to be determined and placed within its own category. Recordin2 Buildin2 ImDrovements Building improvements that extend the useful life should be capitalized. Examples of building improvements include roofing projects, remodeling or replacing major building components. Recordin2 Construction in Pr02ress Construction in progress should be capitalized and not depreciated. It should be reported with land and other non-depreciating assets at the government-wide level. Unspent debt proceeds from capital assets related debt are reported in the net assets section of the statement of net assets as "restricted for capital projects." Recordinl! Machinery and Equipment (Includinl! Office Equipment) Assets such as furniture, machinery and equipment (that meet threshold levels) should be capitalized and inventoried. Some assets, individually, may fall below the capitalization threshold but may be purchased in large quantities by the City e.g. computers, books. City staff should aggregate such assets and consider the materiality and significance of them and if material or significant capitalize such items either individually or in the aggregate. Recordinl! Vehicles Vehicles should be identified, inventoried, and depreciated. Recordinl! Easements An easement is an interest in land owned by another that entitles its holder to a specific limited use of the land. Therefore, easements are not required to be reported unless the City paid for the easement. Establishinl! and Settinl! the Threshold Levels for Recordinl! Capital Assets The following elements of useful life and asset costs are established for capitalization of assets: Estimated Useful Life - the first criterion is useful life. An asset must have an estimated useful life greater than one (1) year to be considered for capitalization and depreciation. Assets that are consumed, used-up, habitually lost or worn-out in one year or less will not be capitalized. Asset Cost - The second criterion for determining depreciable capital assets is cost. The capitalization threshold shall be established as follows for per individual asset item. Land Construction in Progress Building and Building Improvements Infrastructure Machinery and Equipment Vehicles Capitalize and Depreciate Capitalize Only Capitalize Only $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Depreciation Definition Depreciation is the process of allocating the cost of tangible property over a period oftime rather than deducting the cost as an expense in the year of acquisition. It is the City's policy to use the straight-line depreciation method. The basis of the asset is written off evenly over the useful life of the asset. The same amount of depreciation is taken each year. In general, the amount of annual depreciation is determined by dividing an asset's depreciable cost by its estimated life. The total amount depreciated can never exceed the asset's historic cost. To avoid the complications of depreciating each asset from the specific date on which it is placed in service, the City will utilize a half year convention. Under this convention, property placed in service at anl time during a given year is treated as if it had been placed in service on the first day of the t month. If the property is disposed of before the end of its useful life, only 6 months depreciation is allowed for that final year. To calculate depreciation on a capital asset, the following four factors must be known: . The date the asset was placed in service . The asset's cost or acquisition value . The asset's estimated useful life, and . The depreciation method Obtainine: an Asset's Cost of Acquisition Value Capital assets are reported at historical cost and should include the cost of freight, site preparation, architect and engineering fees, etc. If something other than cash is used to pay for the asset, then the fair-market value of the non-cash payment or consideration determines the asset's cost or acquisition value. When the value of the consideration paid can't be determined, the asset's fair-market value determines its cost. With few exceptions, an asset's cost should also include necessary costs incurred to place the asset in service. Costs include the invoice price plus incidental costs (insurance during transit, freight, capitalized interest as described earlier, duties, title search, registration fees, and installation costs). Exceptions to this rule include interest expenses associated with deferred payments and real estate taxes paid, if any, in the acquisition of property. Establishine: Classes of Assets The City establishes the following major categories of capital assets, with further details defined in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part of this policy. Land Buildings and Building Improvements Construction in Progress Vehicles Machinery and Equipment (Including Office Equipment) Infrastructure Adopted this day of 2004. City Administrator Asset Type Non-Infrastructure Land Land Improvements-ground work EXHIBIT A CAPITAL ASSETS CLASSES Examples Ballfields, landscaping, sprinkler system Buildings & Building Improvements Building Improvements such as: Electrical/Plumbing HVAC Systems Roofing Carpet Replacement Vehicles - Cars and light trucks Fire trucks Equipment- Heavy Construction Equipment Firefighting Equipment Air-conditioners, heating, ventilation systems Ladders Backhoes, trucks, dozers, front-end loaders, tractors, graders Hoses, breathing apparatus Depreciable Life In Years No Depreciation 20 50 20 20 20 5 5 20 10 10 Radio, Communications Equipment Mobile, portable radios, camcorder, radar 5 Telephone systems 10 Recreational Athletic Equipment Custodial Equipment Grounds Equipment Office Equipment Infrastructure Easements Water Systems Sanitary Sewer Systems Lift Stations Storm Sewer Systems Streets/Roads Paved Non-paved Pitching machines, treadmills, scoreboards, 10 bleachers, playground equipment Floor scrubbers, vacuums Mowers, tractors and attachments Desks, chairs, computers, printers Mains Mains Curb and gutter, mains 5 10 5 No Depreciation 50 50 50 50 20 No Depreciation ~CL City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Councilmembers and City Administrator tP/'-- FROM: Daniel M. Siebenaler, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Liquor Law Violation / B&B Pizza Public Hearing for the Suspension of Liquor License DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION As part of its liquor licensing authority the City of Farmington conducts periodic compliance checks on all licensed retailers in the city. During a recent compliance check four licensed liquor retailers in Farmington sold liquor to an underage adult. In each case the seller has been charged with the violation. Staff is recommending additional sanctions against the license holders. DISCUSSION In December 2003 the Farmington Police Department conducted compliance checks at all licensed liquor retailers in the city. A 19-year-old male, working under the direct supervision of a police officer entered each business and attempted the purchase of an alcoholic beverage. He was given strict instruction to openly identify himself if asked to do so and not to conceal his age in any way. If asked for identification he was instructed to provide his actual Minnesota Driver's License. Staff has included copies of the incident reports as well as a photo of the youthful buyer for Council review. Under Minnesota Statutes and Farmington Ordinance (3-12-13.1) the Council has a right to impose penalties for violation of liquor laws. It is important for the City to send a clear message of owner accountability and zero tolerance for these violations. Since the inception of compliance checks in the City of Farmington the city has imposed a civil penalty on first time violators. Until now there have been no violations more serious than a single violation. Of the four violations in December two were first time violations and two were second time violations. The two first time violations have been charged civil penalties of $400.00 each. The actual sellers have been charged criminally with the violation. The other two violator, B&B Pizza and Kwik Trip have failed two consecutive compliance checks. At B&B in particular he youthful buyer approached the clerk and asked for a bottle of Michelob Golden Draft. The cle k asked for his Driver's license and he gave it to her. The clerk viewed the Driver's license and c mpleted the sale, charging him $2.50. The transaction was observed by a police officer from the utside through the restaurant windows. The youthful buyer set the beer down and the Police Office immediately entered and informed the clerk that she had just sold to an underage person. Per Farmington Ordin ce 3-12-13.1 "The council has a right to suspend or revoke any license for the sale of intoxicatin liquor" for any such violation. In instances where similar violations have occurred in other citi s penalties have ranged from escalating civil fines to civil fines plus suspensions up to three days. The most recent example of such action was in January 2004, when the City of Hastings suspe ded liquor licenses for two days for a second consecutive compliance check violation. Staff is recommending that all liquor licenses of B&B Pizza authorized by the City of Farmington be suspended for a perio of two consecutive days as determined by staff. These penalties have been discussed with the City Attorney and we believe the penalties are both reasonable and sustainable. Staff is recommending hat all liquor licenses for B&B Pizza issued by the City of Farmington be suspended for a period f two consecutive days beginning two weeks from the date of Council action. If approved the effecti e dates will be March 2nd and 3rd, 2004. Council should note th t staff recommendations are not binding and Council has the right to depart from them to be either ore lenient or more strict depending on results of this public hearing. Respectfully submitted Daniel M. Siebenaler FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 19500 MUNICIPAL DR FARMINGTON, MN 55024 (651) 463-3333 Incident Report Report Number: LFA031229003254 Incident Summary Incident Type: Alcohol Compliance Checks Inc Occurred Address: Inc Occurred Start: 12/29/2003 at 0800 Case Status: Report Type: Inc Occurred End: Officer Jim Constantineau #4722 DatelTime Reported: 12/29/2003 at 1800 Persons Involved Event Association: Witness Name: Ryan Patrick Stieg DOB: 02/13/1984 Height: 511 Address: 4079 W 1315t St Phone 1: Home Occupation: Contact DatelTime: at Age: 19 Weight: 200 Number: 952-894-1750 Sex: Male Eye Color: Brown City, State, Zip: Savage, MN Phone 2: Employer / School: Race: White Hair Color: Brown 55378 Number: Vehicles Involved Event Association: Vehicle Type: VIN: Style: Status DIT: at Year: License # : Primary Color: Status Value: $ Vehicle Status: Make: State: Second Color: Rec Date: Model: Expires: Rec Value: $ Property Involved Event Association: Property Type: Make: Color: Value: $ Description: Model: Other Information: Serial Number: Narrative: On Monday, December 29,2003, beginning at approximately 1800, I conducted alcohol compliance checks at those establishments within the City of Farmington that sell alcoholic beverages. The results are as follows: FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 19500 MUNICIPAL DR FARMINGTON, MN 55024 Incident Report 651) 463-3333 Establishment Address Time Pass or Fail Farmington Super USA 22280 Chippendale A v 1820 Pass Farmington Liquor Store South 305 3rd St 1835 Pass Kwik Trip 217 Elm Street 1830 FAIL Econofoods 115 Elm St 1841 Pass Farmington Liquor Store North 18320 Pilot Knob Road 1855 Pass Superamerica 18520 Pilot Knob Road 1900 Pass The Ugly Mugg 18450 Pilot Knob Road 1905 FAIL B & B Pizza 216 Elm Street 1930 FAIL Farmington Eagles Club 200 3rd Street 1915 FAIL Gossips 313 3rd Street 1937 Pass Long Branch Saloon 309 3rd Street 1935 Pass Farmington Lanes 27 5th Street 1945 Pass VFW 421 3rd Street 1941 Pass American Legion 10 8th Street 1949 Pass La Margarita 953 8th Street 2000 Pass Stieg entered the Kwik Trip store with me following at approximately 1830 and retrieved a 6-pack of Miller Genuine Draft Beer from the cooler. He approached the clerk and placed the beer on the counter. The clerk 'ang the beer up and asked for his ID. He provided his drivers license to her and she looked at it. She then proceeded to complete the sale, charging him $5.10 for the beer. Stieg left the store with the beer. I observed the transaction. I approached the clerk, identified myself, and informed her that she just sold beer to an underage person. She identified herself with a Minnesota Driver's License as: Deborah Anne Drewry 05161960 3150 250th St E Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-8578 Steig entered the Ugly Mugg at approximately 1905 while I stood outside and watched through the front window. He requested a bottle of Miller Lite and it was given to him. He was charged $2.50 for it and she never asked for his identification. He paid for the beer and walked toward the door. I entered the store and took the beer from him. I approached the clerk, identified myself, and informed her that she had just sold beer to an underage person. She identified herself with a Minnesota Driver's License as: Jessica Rae Radford 12141980 5353 180th St W Farmington, MN 55024 (612) 964-2826 FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 19500 MUNICIPAL DR FARMINGTON, MN 55024 (651) 463-3333 Incident Report Steig entered the Farmington Eagles Club at approximately 1915 and approached the bar. He requested a bottle of Miller Lite and it was given to him. I was standing outside viewing the transaction through the glass doors. He was charged $2.40 for it. When I saw the bartender give him his change, I entered the bar and Steig left. I identified myself to the bar tender and informed him that he had just sold beer to an underage person. He identified himself with a Minnesota Driver's License as: Ronald Patrick Cummings 02031954 14914 Covington Av Rosemount, MN 55068 (651) 423-5293 It should be noted that Cummings was skeptical about Steig's identity and requested that I provide his driver's license, which had not been originally viewed. I complied with Cummings request and retrieved the license from Steig who had returned to the truck. Steig entered B & B Pizza at approximately 1930 and approached the counter. He asked for a bottle of Michelob Golden Draft Light and it was provided to him. The clerk requested his Driver's License and it was provided to her. She viewed it and completed the sale, charging him $2.50 for the beer. I viewed this from mtside, through the windows. He left the counter and set the beer down. I approached the clerk, identified myself, and informed her that she had just sold beer to an underage person. She identified herself with a Minnesota Driver's License as: Melissa Rae Carr 12031980 201 Greenvale Place #104 Northfield, MN 55057 (507) 301-9672 I returned with Steig to the Farmington Police Department where the beer from Kwik Trip was entered into evidence. The other three had been opened and were therefore left at the respective establishments. This matter will be forwarded to the City Attorney for review and charging. No further information available. CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Attorneys at Law FYI Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Matthew K. Brokl* · Also licensed in Wt\C(msin (651) 452-5000 Fax (651) 452-5550 John F. Kelly Matthew J. Foli Soren M. Mattick Brendan J. Flaherty Marguerite M. McCarron Gina M. Brandt February 5, 2004 B & B Pizza c/o Donald Zietlow 2802 Bergamot Place Onalaska, Wisconsin 54650 Re: Hearing Notice Regarding Alleged Liquor License Violations B & B Pizza - 216 Elm Street, Farmington, Minnesota Dear Mr. Zietlow: Enclosed herewith and served upon you by United States mail is a Hearing Notice Regarding Alleged Liquor License Violations against B & B Pizza located at 216 Elm Street in Farmington, Minnesota. Very truly yours, Campbell Knutson Professional Association ~:t: Joel J - -. -- - JJJ :cjh Enclosure Suite 31 7 · Eagandale Office Center · 1380 Corporate Center Curve · Eagan, MN 55121 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA InRe: City of Farmington Liquor Licensing Complaint Against AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL B & B Pizza 216 Elm Street STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) -f\v CAROLE J. HOEFT, being duly sworn on oath, states that on the ~ day of February, 2004, she served the annexed HEARING NOTICE REGARDING ALLEGED LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATIONS upon the following parties in this action, by mailing a copy thereof to: B & B Pizza Attn: Donald Zietlow 2802 Bergamot Place Onalaska, Wisconsin 54650 enclosed in an envelope, postage for first class mail prepaid, and by depositing the same at the post office in Eagan, Minnesota. ~H1~ Carole 1. Hoeft I Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~day of February, 2004. /1k. O~ Notary Public ~f'~/'~~; n i i ~~~~I ~~~~~! !~1 ~Jc NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA i; , My CommissIon Expires Jan. 31, 2005 () Ci :e?a=::: iiaa!:::>: :: 2 Q2aa~2a~">;) Ryan Patrick Steig, DOB 02-13-1984 t a ~ ~I ' ~ , To: Mayor and Council Members And City Administrator From: Kevan Soderberg Council member Subject: Liquor Law Violation / Public Hearing for Suspension of Liquor License K wik Trip & B&B Pizza Date: February 17, 2004 The two above named businesses each failed a compliance check for the second time. In each of these current cases the clerks asked for and received the requested identification, but failed to observe that the party making the purchase was underage. Inherent with a liquor license is responsibility and a requirement to refrain from selling intoxicating liquor to underage persons. Asking for identification is not just a motion one goes through as part the sale of alcohol. Identification is used for the purpose of determining age and making a decision to refuse the sale of intoxicating liquor to an underage patron. In each case it seems the clerks went through motions, but failed to properly determine age. They gave the appearance of compliance without actual compliance. After reading the information presented in our agenda packets, I am inclined to agree with the staff recommendation of a two day suspension of liquor licenses with a minor modification for the two offending establishments. I would like to remind Council that this action tonight is setting precedent. If Council agrees with Staff recommendation to suspend all liquor licenses for Kwik Trip and B&B Pizza for two days, I suggest that the two days should be a Friday and Saturday approximately two weeks after council action. Were I in attendance I would offer a stern warning that I favor escalating penalties for continued violations. Respectfully submitted, Kevan Soderberg ~b City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: Mayor and Councilmem~, and City Administrator('y/ 'J Daniel M. Siebenaler, Chief of Police TO: SUBJECT: Liquor Law Violation / Kwik Trip Public Hearing for the Suspension of Liquor License DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION As part of its liquor licensing authority the City of Farmington conducts periodic compliance checks on all licensed retailers in the city. During a recent compliance check four licensed liquor retailers in Farmington sold liquor to an underage adult. In each case the seller has been charged with the violation. Staff is recommending additional sanctions against the license holders. DISCUSSION In December 2003 the Farmington Police Department conducted compliance checks at all licensed liquor retailers in the city. A 19-year-old male, working under the direct supervision of a police officer entered each business and attempted the purchase of an alcoholic beverage. He was given strict instruction to openly identify himself if asked to do so and not to conceal his age in any way. If asked for identification he was instructed to provide his actual Minnesota Driver's License. Staff has included copies of the incident reports as well as a photo of the youthful buyer for Council review. Under Minnesota Statutes and Farmington Ordinance (3-12-13.1) the Council has a right to impose penalties for violation of liquor laws. It is important for the City to send a clear message of owner accountability and zero tolerance for these violations. Since the inception of compliance checks in the City of Farmington the city has imposed a civil penalty on first time violators. Until now there have been no violations more serious than a single violation. Of the four violations in December two were first time violations and two were second time violations. The two first time violations have been charged civil penalties of $400.00 each. The actual sellers have been charged criminally with the violation. The other two violators, B&B Pizza and Kwik Trip have failed two consecutive compliance checks. At Kwik Trip in particular the youthful buyer went to the store cooler and retrieved a 6-pack of Miller Genuine Draft Beer. He approached the clerk and placed the beer on the counter. The clerk asked for his Driver's license and he gave it to her. The clerk viewed the Driver's license and completed the sale, charging him $5.10. The transaction was observed by a police officer through the store window. The youthful buyer returned to the Police Officer with the beer who immediately entered the store and informed the clerk that she had just sold beer to an underage person. Per Farmington Ordinance 3-12-13.1 "The council has a right to suspend or revoke any license for the sale of intoxicating liquor" for any such violation. In instances where similar violations have occurred in other cities penalties have ranged from escalating civil fines to civil fines plus suspensions up to three days. The most recent example of such action was in January 2004, when the City of Hastings suspended liquor licenses for two days for a second consecutive compliance check violation. Staff is recommending that all liquor licenses of B&B Pizza authorized by the City of Farmington be suspended for a period of two consecutive days as determined by staff. These penalties have been discussed with the City Attorney and we believe the penalties are both reasonable and sustainable. ACTION REQUESTED Staff is recommending that all liquor licenses for Kwik Trip issued by the City of Farmington be suspended for a period of two consecutive days beginning two weeks from the date of Council action. If approved the effective dates will be March 2nd and 3rd, 2004. Council should note that staff recommendations are not binding and Council has the right to depart from them to be either more lenient or more strict depending on results of this public hearing. Respectfully submitted, ~L Daniel M. Siebenaler FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 19500 MUNICIPAL DR FARMINGTON, MN 55024 :651) 463-3333 Incident Report Report Number: LFA031229003254 Incident Summary Incident Type: Alcohol Compliance Checks Inc Occurred Address: Inc Occurred Start: 12/29/2003 at 0800 Case Status: Report Type: Inc Occurred End: Officer Jim Constantineau #4722 Date/Time Reported: 12/29/2003 at 1800 Persons Involved Event Association: Witness Name: Ryan Patrick Stieg DOB: 02/13/1984 Height: 511 Address: 4079 W 131st St Phone 1: Home Occupation: Contact Date/Time: at Age: 19 Weight: 200 Number: 952-894-1750 Sex: Male Eye Color: Brown City, State, Zip: Savage, MN Phone 2: Employer / School: Race: White Hair Color: Brown 55378 Number: Vehicles Involved Event Association: Vehicle Type: VIN: Style: Status DIT: at Year: License # : Primary Color: Status Value: $ Vehicle Status: Make: State: Second Color: Rec Date: Model: Expires: Rec Value: $ Property Involved Event Association: Property Type: Make: Color: Value: $ Description: Model: Other Information: Serial Number: Narrative: On Monday, December 29,2003, beginning at approximately 1800, I conducted alcohol compliance checks at those establishments within the City ~fFarmington that sell alcoholic beverages. The results are as follows: FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 19500 MUNICIPAL DR FARMINGTON, MN 55024 Incident Report 651\ 463-3333 Establishment Address Time Pass or Fail Farmington Super USA 22280 Chippendale A v 1820 Pass Farmington Liquor Store South 305 3fd St 1835 Pass Kwik Trip 217 Elm Street 1830 FAIL Econofoods 115 Elm St 1841 Pass Farmington Liquor Store North 18320 Pilot Knob Road 1855 Pass Superamerica 18520 Pilot Knob Road 1900 Pass The Ugly Mugg 18450 Pilot Knob Road 1905 FAIL B & B Pizza 216 Elm Street 1930 FAIL Farmington Eagles Club 200 3fd Street 1915 FAIL Gossips 313 3fd Street 1937 Pass Long Branch Saloon 309 3fd Street 1935 Pass Farmington Lanes 27 5th Street 1945 Pass VFW 421 3fd Street 1941 Pass American Legion 10 8th Street 1949 Pass La Margarita 953 8th Street 2000 Pass Stieg entered the Kwik Trip store with me following at approximately 1830 and retrieved a 6-pack of Miller Genuine Draft Beer from the cooler. He approached the clerk and placed the beer on the counter. The clerk 'ang the beer up and asked for his ill. He provided his drivers license to her and she looked at it. She then proceeded to complete the sale, charging him $5.10 for the beer. Stieg left the store with the beer. I observed the transaction. I approached the clerk, identified myself, and informed her that she just sold beer to an underage person. She identified herself with a Minnesota Driver's License as: Deborah Anne Drewry 05161960 3150 250th St E Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-8578 Steig entered the Ugly Mugg at approximately 1905 while I stood outside and watched through the front window. He requested a bottle of Miller Lite and it was given to him. He was charged $2.50 forit and she never asked for his identification. He paid for the beer and walked toward the door. I entered the store and took the beer from him. I approached the clerk, identified myself, and informed her that she had just sold beer to an underage person. She identified herself with a Minnesota Driver's License as: Jessica Rae Radford 12141980 5353 180th St W Farmington, MN 55024 (612) 964-2826 FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 19500 MUNICIPAL DR FARMINGTON, MN 55024 (651) 463-3333 Incident Report Steig entered the Farmington Eagles Club at approximately 1915 and approached the bar. He requested a bottle of Miller Lite and it was given to him. I was standing outside viewing the transaction through the glass doors. He was charged $2.40 for it. When I saw the bartender give him his change, I entered the bar and Steig left. I identified myself to the bar tender and informed him that he had just sold beer to an underage person. He identified himself with a Minnesota Driver's License as: Ronald Patrick Cummings 02031954 14914 Covington Av Rosemount, MN 55068 (651) 423-5293 It should be noted that Cummings was skeptical about Steig's identity and requested that I provide his driver's license, which had not been originally viewed. I complied with Cummings request and retrieved the license from Steig who had returned to the truck. Steig entered B & B Pizza at approximately 1930 and approached the counter. He asked for a bottle of Michelob Golden Draft Light and it was provided to him. The clerk requested his Driver's License and it was provided to her. She viewed it and completed the sale, charging him $2.50 for the beer. I viewed this from mtside, through the windows. He left the counter and set the beer down. I approached the clerk, identified myself, and informed her that she had just sold beer to an underage person. She identified herself with a Minnesota Driver's License as: Melissa Rae Carr 12031980 201 Greenvale Place #104 Northfield, MN 55057 (507) 301-9672 I returned with Steig to the Farmington Police Department where the beer from Kwik Trip was entered into evidence. The other three had been opened and were therefore left at the respective establishments. This matter will be forwarded to the City Attorney for review and charging. No further information available. Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Matthew K. Brokl* · Also licensed in Wisconsin CAM~~f:~nS~~~TSON FYI Attorneys at Law . (651) 452-5000 Fax (651) 452-5550 John F. Kelly Matthew J. Foli Soren M. Mattick Brendan J. Flaherty Marguerite M. McCarron Gina M. Brandt February 5,2004 Kwik Trip c/o Betty Goldberg 1855 Summit Lane Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Re: Hearing Notice Regarding Alleged Liquor License Violations Kwik Trip - 217 Elm Street, Farmington, Minnesota Dear Ms. Goldberg: Enclosed herewith and served upon you by United States mail is a Hearing Notice Regarding Alleged Liquor License Violations against Kwik Trip located at 217 Elm Street in Farmington, Minnesota. Very truly yours, Campbell Knutson :~./ oel J. Ja JJJ :cjh Enclosure Suite 3] 7 · Eagandale Office Center · 1380 Corporate Center Curve · Eagan, MN 55121 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA InRe: City of Farmington Liquor Licensing Complaint Against AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL K wik Trip 217 Elm Street STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) CAROLE J. HOEFT, being dilly sworn on oath, states that on the ~ day of February, 2004, she served the annexed HEARING NOTICE REGARDING ALLEGED LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATIONS upon the following parties in this action, by mailing a copy thereof to: K wik Trip Attn: Betty Goldberg 1855 Summit Lane Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 enclosed in an envelope, postage for first class mail prepaid, and by depositing the same at the post office in Eagan, Minnesota. Qz-~ Carole J. Hoeft Subscribed and sworn to before me thisQA day of February, 2004. ~QiJ1~ No Public ~~?:-.c~.; DEBRA OLDEEN I; . NOTARYPUBUC-MINNESOTA ~... \. My CocMdssIon ExpIres Jan. 31, 2005)1 .~~ :: : J e :. i 1i i : ! : .: :: : : :: a i?~<?<'?<?S" \ 11 0257 Ryan Patrick Steig, DOB 02-13-1984 -... t", I · ~ ttr' "- ,"' lOa.- City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator LfP~ " FROM: Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Members RE: Recreational Facilities Report DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION On April 21, 2003, the City Council approved a request from the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) to assemble a Recreational Facilities Task Force (Task Force). Subsequently a Task Force was assembled that consisted of membership from many different community organizations. The Task Force met for the first time on June 17,2003 and adopted the following goals that were based on input from the PRAC members: Goal #1: Inventory and identify all public recreational facilities. Goal #2: Evaluate existing facilities to determine maintenance needs and identify what facilities need to be replaced or upgraded. Goal #3: Develop a short-term (2-3 years) and long-term (5-10 years) prioritized vision for future recreational facilities. Goal #4: Identify potential finance methods for future funding of the construction of recreational facilities. Goal #5: To discuss and explore public/private partnerships for current and future recreational facilities. Goal #6: To focus on cross-utilization of all current and future recreational facilities in order to maximize their use. Goal #7: To provide an opportunity for public comment on the draft report. Goal #8: To provide information about the Recreational Facility Task Force through the media, City web site and various other methods that are available. Ingraham and Associates was hired by City Council action on July 7, 2003 to assist the Task Force with accomplishing its goals. DISCUSSION Included with this memo is the Farmington Recreational Facility Needs Study report that the Task Force completed over the past 6 months. The Task Force initially identified an aggressive timeline that called for a final report to be presented to the City Council at its second meeting in December 2003. Unfortunately the timeline was not able to be met due to the Task Force wanting to hold a public open house in mid-November to provide the community an opportunity to give feedback to the Task Force on its key findings and recommendations. In addition, the Task Force also wanted to allow students to complete a survey in order to receive feedback from this age group. With the exception of Goal #3, all other goals were accomplished by the Task Force. During the course of determining what the final report would consist of, Task Force members felt that rather than looking at what the short and long term priorities were, they would rather formulate immediate recommended actions that would address the priorities that were identified by the public surveys and task force members. They felt that putting a specific number of years that the priorities should be accomplished by may be misleading or create expectations that may not be able to be met and if not met, may be deemed as a failure. The PRAC has reviewed the report that is included in the City Council packet and unanimously voted to accept the report. It also unanimously voted by separate motion, to recommend to the City Council that it accept the report and to strongly consider moving forward with the three recommended actions consisting of: 1. Land Acquisition - Prepare a Park and Recreation System Plan. 2. Community Center - Prepare a feasibility study of a Farmington Community Center. 3. Funding - A comprehensive funding and partnership strategy should be prepared. ACTION REQUESTED By motion accept the Farmington Recreational Facility Needs Study. By separate motion approve the request to move forward on the three recommended actions that consist of the following: 1. Land Acquisition - Prepare a Park and Recreation System Plan. 2. Community Center - Prepare a feasibility study of a Farmington Community Center. 3. Funding - A comprehensive funding and partnership strategy should be prepared. Respectfully Submitted, Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Members: Randy Oswald, Paula Higgins, Dawn Johnson Mike Buringa PRAC ChaIT ~CViCe-Ch&~ De:~: } ~ 4: I V~ CVH'~_.' ....... 0 Robin Hanson PRAC Member Farmington Recreational Facility Needs Study "The Path to 2010- Creating a High Quality Recreational Facility System" Farmington Recreational Facility Needs Study - Table of Contents Summary .............................................................................. page 2-4 1. Introduction ..................................................................... page 5-6 2. Existing Conditions ......................................................... page 7 3. City Growth .................................................................... page 8 4. Recreation Trends ........................................................... page 8 5. Needs Analysis ................................................................ page 9-11 6. Public Input ..................................................................... page 11-13 7. Key Findings ................................................................... page 14 8. Priorities and Recommendations .................................... page 15 9. Key Recommendations ................................................... page 16 Appendices........................................................................... page 1 7 1 Farmington Recreational Facility Needs Study - Summary "The Path to 2010- Creating a High Quality Recreational Facility System" SUMMARY High quality recreational facilities are essential components of quality communities. The City of Farmington recognized the importance of such facilities and initiated a study of recreational facility needs. This study analyzed existing and future Areas of F.uture Development Map City of Farmington 4.2 "'>>prOYOd F"lure MUS">' Sl;l.iJitriJ M~a (L2t<2 &cr(lS) _ fbjid~b:o I\r<s>tlS W;t"'H1 C'JfrC~tMUSA (a50 .acfe%!.} RZ,20 Umar: R<"!IS.H\'(l (2.279 Sea Ie 0,5 115 2 recreational facility needs. It answers the question - What facilities are needed? To build a quality recreation system for generations to come the following questions will need to answered next - How?, Where? and At what cost? These questions would be answered in the next phase through implementation of the following key recommendations. The Study The study was guided by a task force of residents and representatives of various community organizations. The Recreational Facility Task Force (Task Force) gathered and analyzed existing facilities, compared this inventory to national standards and norms, gathered extensive public input and forecasted community needs. The Task Force determined the following: y Recreation facilities are key elements in a community's quality of life. y The number and quality of existing City recreation facilities are inadequate and below the level of similar surrounding communities. y The public is very interested in high quality recreation facilities. Priority Facilities The Task Force study and public opinion survey results indicated the following prioirities: 1. Community Center 2. Sports Complexes 3. Land Acquisition 4. Gymnasiums 5. Trails Farmington Recreation Facility Priorities Acquire large parcels for: Community center. sports complexes,. community parks and conservation areas. 4. Iadoor GymlUlSiumslField Roue Build community gyms in a community center, in partnership with the School District or through a public- 'vate rshi . 50 Trails Expand trail network and connections. ~ . Needs Varies depending upon size and facilities. Estimated range of $5 - 15 million. Land needs approximately 10 - 15 acres. Potntial . Suftell Partnerships, general funds, bond referendum funds and grants. Construction costs approximately Park dedication, grants. $900,000 - $1.800.000 per complex. partnerships and general funds. Most neighborhood recreation land can be acquired through park dedication from new subdivisions. Land costs estimated at $10,000- $90.0000 per acre for large parcels. Approximately 200-250 acres needed for major recreation sites. Approximately $750.000 per gym court. Built largely through park dedication and subdivision requirements. Bituminous trails cost around $100.000 r mile. Recommended Actions The City Council is asked to endorse the following three actions to improve Farmington recreation facilities in order to meet resident's needs and desires. 1. Land Acquisition - Prepare a Park and Recreation System Plan. Identify locations for a community center, two sports complexes, community parks, neighborhood parks, open spaces, natural areas and special use parks. The facility locations will be coordinated with the Farmington Trail Plan and growth and development forecasts. Park dedication, grants. partnerships, general funds and donations. Continue acquisition including park dedication for neighborhood parks, trails,. etc. Partnerships, bond referendum and joint powers agreements. Park dedication and developer installation. County or State installation on County/State RoaQs. ci funds for ci road F . Needs Prepare a community center feasibility study. Prepare a park and recreation system plan to identify sports complex locations. Prepare a park and recreation system plan to identify park and open space sites. Develop a comprehensive funding strategy and ershi s. Coordination with Community Center planning and School District planning. Implementation according to City Trail Plan. The System Plan should also include likely land and facility construction costs. Acquire the larger land areas needed for the sport complexes and community center. 2. Community Center - Prepare a feasibility study of a Farmington Community Center. The study should determine components, location, proj ect costs, and funding options. A community survey can help determine the level of community support for a bond referendum or other funding strategy. The City should focus on five priority facilities. 1. Community Center 2. Sports Complex 3. Land Acquisition 4. Gymnasiums 5. Trails 3 Key Recommendations: ~ Land Acquisition ~ Community Center ~ Funding 3. Funding - A comprehensive funding and partnership strategy should be prepared. To address short and long-term recreation facility and land acquisition needs, a funding strategy should be developed that identifies a wide variety of funding sources including, but not limited to: park dedication, general funds, special funds, bond referendums, sales taxes, grants, sponsorships, and donations. The strategy should also identify potential public and public-private partnerships for facility acquisition, development and operation. City Council Action The Task Force Committee and the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission are requesting City Council to take the following actions: ./ Adopt the Recreational Facility Needs Study ./ Approve moving forward with the three Key Recommendations. Metro cities put community front and center Eagan joi:qsa growing list of suburbs building new gatheripg places. ?hotographs by Darlene Prois/Star Tfbune Sandy Brownlee walks from her Eagan home to the city's new community center for workouts. She says her favorite spot Is OIl the stationary cycle, where $he can see the wetlands and wooded hills. '1'Ills.1s for future generations, " she sald of the center. Even wlthtiglrt budgets, Eagan and other cities value a place where residents can feel a sense of belonging. 4 Farmington Recreational Facility Needs Study "The Path to 2010- Creating a High Quality Recreational Facility System" 1. INTRODUCTION Why study recreation facility needs? The Opportunity of a Lifetime The City of Farmington is at an important crossroad in its history. When it comes to park and recreation facilities, cities typically only have one chance at doing it right. Ifland for public recreation and open space is not set aside prior to development, the opportunity is either lost forever or the cost increases one hundred fold to acquire the land after development. Witness cities buying developed property along rivers for parks and trails at a cost of millions of dollars for a few acres or condemning housing and businesses for an athletic complex. It is very much a "pay me now or pay me later" scenario. Farmington is not unique in its recreation needs and desires. Quality recreation opportunities define quality of life and quality neighborhoods and quality communities. What is unique about Farmington is the window of opportunity available to do the right thing. While budgets are tight and anti-tax sentiments run high, the cost of land will never be lower and there appears to be strong community support for a quality recreation system. The long-term economic implication of a sustained and coordinated investment in park and recreation facilities is only positive. Higher land values, higher property tax revenue, more desirable neighborhoods, a healthier community, a sense of community, lower service costs, (for park and recreation land). Successful cities have a well-balanced high quality recreation system. Think of cities you admire. Why do they stand out? Would you rank their park and recreation systems above or below average? Think of places you go for a vacation or day trip. Why do you go there? You go because it offers amenities like parks, natural areas and recreational opportunities. When looking for a new home do you consider the supply and location of parks, trail and recreation facilities? Studies show that parks and recreation facilities are consistently among the top three reasons people cite for choosing a new neighborhood. Studies show that parks and recreation facilities are consistently among the top three reasons people cite for choosing a new neighborhood. Various community center facilities 5 The City of Farmington recognizes the importance of quality recreation facilities. Over reliance on school facilities 6 The City of Farmington recognizes the importance of quality recreation facilities and initiated this study to: 1. Inventory existing recreation facilities. 2. Evaluate maintenance and improvement needs. 3. Recommendations for future recreation facilities. 4. Identify funding sources and partnerships. 5. Focus on shared and multi-use facilities. 6. Obtain public input / make study information available. 7. Report the study findings and recommendations to the City Council. Study Process The City Council authorized the study and an advisory task force was selected to guide the study. The task force members represent ten different community organizations. Study Task Force members: Jody Arman-Jones - Farmington Youth Athletic Association Doug Bonar - Farmington School District Paul Burkel - Dakota County Fairgrounds Loren Cartwright - Farmington School District Lacelle Cordes - Farmington City Council Marlo Dahl - Farmington Chamber of Commerce Christy Fogarty - Farmington City Council Robin Hanson - Farmington Youth Athletic Association Paul Harrington - Farmington Fastpitch Softball Paula Higgins - City of Farmington Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Paul Oppedisano - Farmington Slowpitch Softball Randy Oswald - City of Farmington Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Dan Sellner - Citizen at Large Jamie Thompson - Ministerial Association Charlie Weber - Farmington Senior Organization The Task Force's role was to conduct the study and submit a final report back to the City Council. The Task Force met five times, conducted a tour of recreation facilities, held a community open house meeting, met with the Farmington Parks and Recreation Commission and reviewed and approved the study recommendations. The Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the study and recommendations. Technical assistance was provided by Ingraham & Associates, a recreation planning consultant and Farmington Parks and Recreation staff. Public input opportunities included a community open City ho~s.e meeting, task for~e ~eetings, an opmIon survey and web SIte mput. 30 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS Farmington has a developing system of school and city recreation facilities. The city has 16 developed parks, an outdoor swimming pool and an ice arena. School District # 192 has six school and administrative sites with indoor and outdoor recreation facilities. See Appendix page 18 for a map and inventory of facilities. Farmington's supply of recreational facilities is unusual for its heavy reliance on school facilities. School facilities account for approximately 77% of all athletic facilities in the city. City facilities account for 23%. Most communities have a more even distribution of facilities between city and school facilities. Farmington relies primarily upon dedication of park land or cash in lieu of land dedication from developers to acquire park land and build recreation facilities. Park dedication alone has typically not been sufficient to acquire and build an adequate supply of parks and recreation facilities. Most Farmington city facilities in parks are newer and in good condition. Some notable exceptions are the outdoor pool at Evergreen Knoll Park, which was built in 1971 and is 32 years old, exceeding the standard for pool life by seven years, the Civic Ice Arena, which was built in 1978 and is over 25 years old, two softball fields and one youth baseball field at Rambling River Park, which are built on a site previously used as the town dump. Most outdoor and indoor school facilities are also in generally good to excellent condition, however due to overuse some of the outdoor athletic facilities have begun to experience deterioration in turf areas and long term maintenance will need to be addressed. Farmington: Outdoor Pool 7 Farmington is a rapidly growing community with an estimated 2004 population of over 18,000 People. As new sports emerge or popularity increases, residents want access to facilities for those activities. Farmington's population is forecast to double between 2000 and 2012. 8 3. CITY GROWTH Farmington is a rapidly growing city located in the south edge of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Farmington has an estimated 2004 population of over 18,000 people. The population doubled between 1990 and 2000. The city is characterized as a fast growing suburb possessing a traditional downtown area and core residential areas. It possesses new growth housing areas, farms, open space and natural resources such as the Vermillion River. Rapid growth is expected to continue in the coming decades. Farmington's recent growth has resulted in increased use of existing recreation facilities. As the City continues to grow, the demand will become even greater for new recreational facilities Demographic trends like the aging "Baby Boom" generation, increasing number of active senior citizens and rising number of families with school age children will influence recreation participatio~ and facility needs. Farmington Population Growth 30,000 25,000 20,000 1 5,000 1 0,000 5,000 o Year Population 1980 - 4,370 1990 - 5,940 2000 - 12,000 2010 - 22,500 2020 - 30,000 4. RECREATION TRENDS Recreation trends affect the need and type of recreation facilities. As new sports emerge or popularity increases, residents want access to facilities for those activities. New technology can affect recreation use. For example, mountain bikes increased the popularity of bicycling and in-line skates added a new trail use. Some of the most significant recent recreation trends are: ~ fucreased trail use. ~ ~creased number females participating In sports. ~ The rise of fitness and exercise clubs. ~ Year-round training and off-season leagues for competitive sports. ~ Active seniors who use a wide variety of recreation facilities. ~ Demand for high quality fields, courts and gyms. ~ The emergence of "extreme" sports such as skateboarding, climbing, BMX bikes, etc. The lessons learned from changing recreation trends and increased recreation participation are: ./ Acquire, plan for and build flexible multi-use facilities. ./ Continually seek feedback, evaluate and adjust facility use. ./ Build quality facilities. ./ fuvolve stakeholders in the design, funding and use decisions. 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 5. NEEDS ANALYSIS The determination of community recreation facility needs was based on analysis of national and local recreation standards, community input (task force, commission and public) and professional experience (City staff and Ingraham & Associates recreation consultants). Recreation Service Standards Service standards are accepted standards for the minimum supply of different types of recreation facilities. There are two types of standards. One is based on population and the other is based on geographic area. Population standards define a minimum number of facilities and the area standards define an appropriate spacing and access to facilities. Standards based on National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) standards were reviewed by the Task Force and used to determine minimum community recreation needs. Recreation facility numbers from Twin City metropolitan area cities was also used as a benchmark. The service standards were applied to the existing year 2003 condition and the forecast 2020 conditions to determine existing and future facility needs. The results of the application of the population and area standards are contained on the Inventory and Service Standards Analysis on the next page and on page 19 in the appendix. Service standards are accepted standards for the minimum supply of different types of recreation facilities. Service Area Example: Red circles show areas served by recreation facilities. Yellow areas indicate gaps where recreation supply is inadequate. 9 Population Standards The NRPA has standards for the number of residents that can be served by various recreation facilities. For instance, the standards suggest there should be at least one tennis court for every 2,000 people and one small ball field for each 2,500 people. There are recommended minimum standards for most types of recreation facilities. Area Standards Area standards specify the maximum distance most people should be from a recreational facility. For example "there should be a basketball court within 'i4 mile to ;/2 mile of most residents". Area standards are based on the idea that certain facilities should serve a neighborhood (small ball field, play equipment, tennis court, basketball court, skating, etc.) and other facilities should serve several neighborhoods or the whole community (such as large soccer fields, football fields, gymnasiums, indoor ice rinks, pools, etc. These area standards translate into circular service areas that define minimal acceptable spacing for various facilities. See the map of small ballfield service area gaps on page 11. City Recreation Facility Inventory and Minimum Service Standards - Farmington, MN Baseball & Soccer Football Tennis Outdoor Softball Fields Fields Courts Hacke Gym Courts City Facility Total 9 1 0 2 2 0 18,000 14 5 1 9 6 2 22 3 1 14 2 1 18 7 2 11 2 5-13 2-6 2 7-12 4 2 2020 est. population NRPA minimum rec. 0 10 NRPA Service Area min rec. 3 S. Metro avera e o. 1/1 250 1/3333 1/20000 1/3000 1/10000 .25-.5 1/2-1 15-20 min .25-.5 10-15 min 15-20 min. 1/1,000 1/2,610 1/10,000 1/1,600 1/10,000 Facility standards represent the minimum recommended number of recreation facilities based on population or geographic service area, School facilities are not included. Sources: National Recreation and Parks Association, Ingraham & Associates, Inc. and the City of Farmington. 10 Analvsis of Service Standards The use of area and population service standards shows that the City of Farmington has a significant deficiency in the inventory of many recreation facilities and that the shortfall will be extreme by 2010 if the city does not take steps to add new recreation facilities in the near future. The city does not have the recommended minimum number of baseball, softball, soccer fields, tennis courts, hockey rinks and other facilities. Including the school facilities in the analysis brings the inventory numbers up, but the school facilities are not always available for public use and are concentrated at a few school sites. The City does not have the same inventory of recreation facilities as many of its neighboring communities. The inventory of recreation facilities in Farmington is less than the average inventory of recreation facilities found in a survey of south metro area communities. This means that Farmington residents have less than minimum recommended access to city recreation. 6. PUBLIC INPUT While national and regional recreation standards are helpful in identifying general needs, each community is unique and must be evaluated individually. This is where public input is important to define Farmington's unique needs, desires, opportunities and constraints. This study gathered a broad range of community input throughout the process to make sure that the recommendations represent the city needs and desires. The study was guided by a diverse group of people who were selected to represent a broad range of interests and viewpoints. The task force input guided the study and formed the recommendations. The task force held a community open house meeting on November 18, 2003 that was attended by approximately 100 people. A recreation survey was distributed at the open house meeting and to student groups. 158 people completed the survey. The Task Force draft findings and recommendations were published in the city newsletter and on the city web site. There were articles in local newspapers about the recreation facility study. The community input was used to shape the final recommendations and priorities. The Farmington Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission was updated regularly regarding the study and on December 10,2003 the TaskForce met with the Park and Recreation Commission to review the recommendations. The Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the draft report on February 11,2004. Service Area Gaps . Farmington Existing Parks, Trails & Open Space Map Updated: Sept 2002 ~ . ~ ~ ii. ~ g ~ ~ . ~ I ~ ~ " * --- -- . F.i~V~ Tot Lot . FJ~v& 1\h:ligbt.'!}(iv..x>:1 FilIi<, . F.D;.^;-:>G:)eT\:tllJfl'lyParl<: !\/..1i:<:ilV:":4E>>t.J:Y1in<:lull- / '" I' f\.m.>t.rll mlllrr, ,''f'Al:;;; f1ikwm:i~ ;, J FHtur-r, AgQ;t1f:at~ N (;':)(l(:f"tB Sid~...~lk :/~ ~~~&2Z~~,~;~t~ SidCW&h Pm!<:Tfl~ I CIty PE:t~iOpel~ S~t~ ,', ...... Sdwnl f'~,-~!ij,,< Pn>l<3ttff'a?X N W*E s Scaie o 0.5 0.5 1 MMe-s 11 Land Acquisition is the most important short-term action. Public Opinion Survey Results medium (4-5 years) and long term (5+ years) actions. A summary ofthe facility results is listed below. A summary of full survey results, respondent comments and the survey form are contained in the appendix. The following is a summary of the public opinion survey conducted at the open house meeting and with student groups. The survey was designed to allow participants to rate the importance of the Task Forces draft recommendations and to prioritize them into short (1-3 years), The five most important recreation facilities to Farmington residents are: Highest ranking facilities (survey results). Importance rating on a scale of 1-5 with 5 as the most important facility. 1. Community center 4.15 2. Sports complexes 4.10 3. Land acquisition 3.88 4. Trails 3.74 5. Indoor gymnasiums 3.73 Typical Sports Complex The Recreation Facility Task Force has determined that the most important short-term action is Land Acquisition. <I.l ~ ve- c: . ~ <( <I.l Iii "0 -'" III o / '. ! P I - I' .. ~ I" !ll Ntw lnitl *"9 Wentworth & OK.... Ave""," - ...... .... *1 , a s :; '" -Q. o . ~Cii Uw ~ ~ >< 0.0 ~~ g? Ec::"" 8.!J!~ Q. '" "'......2 "t::G>= 8.~0 (I)::!i:~ ::> .2> u. #7 Sports Complex Master Plan -, 02-0041 IBS 07,~~~3 MP 12 Farmington Recreation Facilitv Survey Summary A public opinion survey was prepared to determine Farmington resident's opinions about recreation facility needs. 158 people completed the survey that was distributed at the November 18, 2003 community meeting and to student groups at Farmington schools. The survey participants were asked to rate the importance of various recreation facilities and to offer comments on general or specific recreation needs/issues. The following is a summary of the survey results. Top Priorities Rank based on averages from rating the importance of each activity from 1 (low importance) to 5 (high importance). 1. Community center 2. Sports complexes 3. Land acquisition 4. Trails 5. Indoor gymnasiums 6. Aquatic facilities 7. Baseball fields 8. Passive parks and open space 9. Add lighting to existing fields 10. Softball fields 11. Picnic shelters Asphalt Trail Woodchip Trail 4.15 4.10 3.88 3.74 3.73 3.51 3.49 3.49 3.47 3.38 3.38 Gravel Trail Mowed Grass Trail 12. Indoor ice arena 13. Multi-use park buildings 14. Irrigate existing fields 15. Football fields 16. Outdoor ice skating rinks 17. Soccer fields 18. Outdoor basketball courts 19. Arts 20. Tennis courts 21. Outdoor volleyball courts 22. Move existing skate park Trails 3.37 3.34 3.33 3.30 3.20 3.20 3.03 2.90 2.83 2.72 2.52 swr~ Asphalt Trail Wood Boardwalk & Asphalt Trail Winter Use 13 Recreation facilities create: A sense of community, increased property values and economically strong & healthy communities. 14 7. KEY FINDINGS 1. Quality recreation facilities are a key component of community quality of life. Recreation facilities create a sense of community, increase property values and contribute toward an economically strong and healthy community. 2. There is a need for additional athletic facilities, trails, and a multi-use ice arena to meet current recreation needs. There is a lack of facilities to meet the City's current needs. City recreation facilities are sub-par compared to other similar communities and the city needs to take action to catch up. 3. There is a need to aggressively plan for and fund recreation facility development to keep up with growth and increased demand. Farmington is growing rapidly and recreation facilities must keep up with that growth. Youth and adult program participation numbers continue to grow. Adding recreation facilities after development occurs is inefficient and costly. 4. There is an over reliance on School District facilities. While there are benefits of using school facilities, public access to school facilities is limited. This results in a lack of facilities for adult use and an inability to assure public use to meet community needs. The City should continue to strengthen a cooperative relationship with the School District and should consider shared development of recreation facilities when the opportunity anses. 5. There is significant interest in a multi- use community center. A community center can serve as a hub of the community. Given Minnesota's climate and the demand for indoor athletic, meeting, social and community space, a community center is a desirable facility. A community center was the number one need identified by the residents in meetings and in surveys. 6. Now is the time to focus on land acquisition for future facilities. As a growing community with increasing land values, the primary focus should be on acquisition of land for key community facilities such as a community center and sport complexes. Acquiring land now outside of the urbanized area will result in huge cost savings. In response to those findings the task force prepared a draft set of recommendations , . to improve Farmington s recreatIOn facilities. Those facility recommendations were presented to the pubic at a community meeting and via public opinion surveys. The final facility recommendations were refined based on the extensive public input and to reflect Farmington resident's desires. The following are the five priority facility recommendations. These are the top five facilities in order of importance as reflected by the by the 100 people who participated in the open house meeting and the 158 people who filled out the public opinion survey are described on the following page. 8. PRIORITIES The study recommendations are based on the vision of providing high quality recreation facilities for Farmington in keeping with the input gathered by the Task Force. The study recommendations focus on five key facility priorities. Priority Recreation Facilities 1. Community Center - Acquire land and construct a multi-use community center. Community centers include facilities and activities for all ages, abilities and interests and help create a focal point and sense of community. Examples of potential community center facilities are: gymnasiums, meeting rooms, fitness equipment, senior center, teen center, indoor playground, swimming pools/ aquatic facilities, art center, performing arts theater, ice arena, etc. The specific components for a Farmington community center should be determined through a feasibility study. 2. Sports Complex - Acquire land and construct two sports complexes, one for youth and one for adults. These large parks focus on organized athletics and typically contain a mix of baseball and softball fields, and turf fields for soccer, football, lacrosse, etc. These facilities typically need around 40 to 60 acres of land per complex. 3. Land Acquisition - Actively acquire land for future parks, trails and community recreation facilities in advance of development. Now is the time to focus on land acquisition for future facilities. As a growing community with increasing land values, the focus should be on acquisition of land for key community facilities such as a Aquatic Center community center and two sport complexes. Acquiring land now outside of the urbanized area will result in huge cost savings. 4. Indoor Gymnasiums - There is a need for gymnasiums that are open to the public. School gyms are dominated by school activities and do not meet the wide range of community needs. The gyms could be part of a community center and/ or constructed through a city-school partnership agreement in a new school as long as public access is assured. 5. Trails - Continue to expand the trail network. Aggressively pursue trail construction funding and connections according to the City Trail Plan. Farmington City Arena 15 9. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS Key Recommendations: The City of Farmington should initiate the following actions to meet the community's recreational needs: ~ Land Acquisition ~ Community Center ~ Funding 1. Land Acquisition - Prepare a Park and Recreation System Plan that identifies the preferred locations for the community center, a youth sports complex and an adult sports complex, community parks, cultural and fine arts, neighborhood parks, open spaces, natural areas and special use parks. The facility locations will be coordinated with the Farmington Trail Plan and growth, annexation and development plans. The System Plan should include an estimate of land acquisition and facility construction costs.The system plan will act as a blueprint for land acquisition and facility development. Acquire the larger land areas needed for the sport complexes and community center. Community Center w/ Outdoor Play Facility Ifthe City of Farmington can accomplish one thing for the generations to come it should be an aggressive and sustained program of land acquisition for parks, recreation facilities and open space. The land will never be less expensive, there is community support for land acquisition and the acquisition will pay dividends in the form of economically physically and socially healthy community. The 16 opportunity to acquire larger parks and recreation sites (20+ acre sites) is before development occurs and before utilities and improved roads serve the land. This may mean acquiring land that is currently outside of the municipal boundaries. 2. Community Center - Prepare a feasibility study of a Farmington community center. The study should determine components, location, proj ect costs, and funding options. A community survey can help determine community support for a bond referendum or other funding strategy. 3. Funding - Develop a funding strategy and begin steps to implement. This may mean a bond referendum for land acquisition. Leverage the bond funds with other monies and partners. A comprehensive funding and partnership strategy should be prepared to address short and long term recreation facility and land acquisition needs. The funding strategy should evaluate a wide variety of funding sources including but not limited to: park dedication, general funds, special funds, bond referendums, sales taxes, grants, sponsorships, and donations, and should identify potential public and public- private partnerships for facility development and operation. Potential partners identified during the study were School District 192, Dakota County Fair Board, Dakota County, Dakota County Parks, the YMCA, the surrounding townships and others. Contact owners of key properties about their willingness to sell and/or donate land. The priority facilities and recommendations are based on the Task Force study and public opinion survey results. APPENDICES Maps and graphics (Existing recreation facilities)........................ page 17 Recreation facility inventory........................... page 18 Survey form ....................................................... page 19-20 Survey comments ............................................. page 21-23 Farmington Ice Arena 17 City of Farmington Existing Parks and Trails /\I Existing Trail 1\/ Existing Sidewalk ~ Existing Park I " Municipal Boundary Updated on February 10, 2004 N W+E 0.5 o 0.5 Miles s 18 , CD 1/), I I ! i : , , i! i I! · ii,! i I I I I I~ i. ~ ~ i i ; !.....I i --t i. : II ,...... i i I:: I; I I II i !O, 'P' : 00ll.'1 i i : !, I: I i Ii, I Li i i Iii:,' +-' !J: fI) ~- e II -;---+-1' __~_u_~ -----.--t--l--:-;i---,--, 7----r--;~r-:- -, -;- ;-- , ~' 8....- I/)~: :. ' 'I i" I I 'I i.: I ii' ~ ' "0 ~ g ! ; I: -' ; , ; " H; .:,', 'I t, ;. ! :1 I I ; 10 ,. "ftI .5 'i ll. . ! I' I ! I!. I Ii! I'.:: I I ! 1 I i I I (/) I I I I ' I I I I, , : I 'i! 1 I~ ,ft C) () I I I : i' I'" 'I Ii, . ; I ""J I ,;, ' I' I I:' i .~ 5 E ~j t I -'-1 __~____L___~_____ ., ---. -- : -t - ~ I 1- ~ ~ ~ 6 ! i 0 I 10 ,0 CD 0 ~() I : I ' ().- , ...>- 8 CD "O~ 0 ..... E .5 ~.I, I . , I ' i ~ if I I Ni i"1 i" ~ftI ~! ~ !'P' 10 i I'P' ~ i i I I ~ i I I I i Iii jl 8 t il--T----r ---rot . t i' i I I !:~a " ~ ~: ~;N_~I~"_ ~: T~-Il' I Nf.:~:-I: =aftlli" +- ~ ~ . · i : -H ~ - -LIt I -lnJI--ff T- 2 5 (0 (0 I -q- I I I fii! : I . I IN, IN i 11:1 jfi;; ~ ;-tn i :-n:ttL.;,I........_I_'._--_..l,i-__.-LiUt ~ ~! _ ~ LL +t ~ Hit 1 ~ j I & I ~I ~ ~ ~..... .....:NI I i I t~1 I i I'P' ., }ll".' :! ;fl! I I: ~I i I,! II!:! I 1'1 i I ~.n'l 11'-1 n~l: J. nfl':~l;: C 4:11 LL ll. ~ ' I ii, 1 ,I I, I, I j I i ~I ;rH~tr-r +-ij J ,:-: lninT f+ c"fP.llh T !l,,-t:jUi_ i !i hil i 1 -I Nr ~IJ 1::-1=1 I ~ i rl IlllF[T1 ~f~ I <5 I II I I - -, - -I, I I ! I/) , I 2: I I, 1 III I {_ i i 0' 'P' loL: I 8 81 8 81 : I 11=: l!'l : 1>-, W I- is !!i ..::1 I Ol ell n n n n, I I _'01 I ! I ,l!!lm 16.a-1 I- !iiJ: I l 01 1:1: 7ii I ciS~ciS ciS ciS! lell.S I I .n~I: ll. I ~ i i.i!: oi!:l !!!!II! =~ 1 Cf), _Ie III lD e -2:" 12:':,:1 I 111=0' e lD 1ija:: a:: I' - _: I I: :.f(J)ICJ)~ ~~==~I:~~~'~'~~, lo2Uh~.f .fl:f~:lii:lttttl&!~ &!~ I: 19 Farmington Recreation Facility Survey The Farmington R~on FacUity TaskForce is inte~ted in youropinionsaboutrtereationfacility n~<l$ in Farmington. Please answer the following questions. For questions #4-6. indicate theimportanceofeaehproposedfacility improvement or addition to you andwnfm you feel it should occur. P~ circle one nU1l\berper .itetnand indicate ifit should a short-tenn (1-3 years)rnid-tenn (2-5 years) or long-term (+5 year) recreation facility improvelllfmt or additiOn. 1. How long htW4JytJU lived in~? 2. What,., oftheCltydo ytJUl/W in? o North 00-.3 years o 440 years 0 +10 year o East o South o never o once per month 3. How often do you use I'8CIWfton facIIitIes.(patts. gytU. etc.) inF~? o +once per week o once per week 4. How impoIfant.. the following new I'8CIWIfion faciIiIies and when should they occut? New faCilities Outdoor ice skating rink8llnformalskating .1'888 BasebaH fields fields fields Football fields Tennis courts Outdoor volleyball courts Outdoor INI8ketbaII courts Picnic sheltens Indoor gymnasium8 Commul'lity center: A building containing facilities nity recreation, social, and arts Not Somewhat ilnpOrtInt. .. ilnpOrtInt 123 123 123 123 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 20 2 3 4 5 S 2 3 4 5 S M 2 3 5 S M 2 4 5 S M L 2 3 4 5 S 2 3 4 5 S 2 3 4 5 S 2 3 5 S 1 1 1 1 1 1 Please tom over ~ 5. How inIpoI1Mt ant the following addIIIons to 81tisIing I8CI1I8flon fIIdIIIIes.and when should they occUI"l Improvements to existing Not Somewhat "'" SIlort Mediam. Loog facilities ImDOl"tant nt 1m teal term. term. Add lighting to existing atllletic 3 4 5 S M L fieIde: To expand time of use, 1 2 Indoor icerinblarena: 1 2 3 4 5 S M L ice sheet at the existing arena. Irrigate exi$ting. athletic fields: 1 2 3 4 5 S M L To expand U$S and durability. Move the exi8ting __ park: 1 2 3 4 5 S M L Toa more visible location, 6. What oIIIerfaelllty~ ~ you t8COIIIIII8ndand when shoIIId they occur? Other facility recommencIa8ons Not Somewhat Very SIlort Medii... Loog nt teal term. term Other: (please list) 1 2 3 4 5 S M L 1 2 3 4 5 S M L 1 2 3 4 5 S M L 1 2 3 4 5 S M L ~. Do you have_yother eommeaia or though1s that you would like to sJuuoe about reere:atioa tadIities! PIeue tal'll in tile completed questioDaaire to. eity staff or a task foree member bdOre yotIleave. Thank you for your iaput. 21 Farmington Recreation Facility Survey Comments / Adults General Needs / Adults (Additional comments from 90 surveys. Numbers indicate similar responses.) - Cooperation between City and School District - Keep using school facilities - Collaborate for a Community Center - Picnic facilities - RC racetrack - Go cart track - Improve park play equipment - Improved trail connections - Hiking trails - Natural open areas - County Park - Central Park - More "neighborhood" parks - City supported athletic programs and facilities - Profit mechanisms for ice arena - Cafeteria/concession improvements - Vending machines - Plant trees - Better facilities to enable hosting tournaments - Southern locations for rec. facilities - Open Skate Park earlier in spring - Monitor the Skate Park (i.e. drug use) - Facility monitoring - Land acquisition - Improved concession facilities - Improved senior recreation opportunities - Clean up trout stream - Quality over Quantity - *Liquor store (Farmington East) 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Outdoor Athletic Facility Needs / Adults - Soccer Fields - New pool facilities - Sledding hill / slides - Multi-field! Ball complex with Concessions facility - Youth Baseball fields - Batting Cages - Warming House hours extended - Covered hockey rink - New Facilities @ Farmington Preserve - BMX Bike Trails - Public Golf Course 4 2 2 2 22 Indoor Athletic Facility Needs / Adults - Community Center 12 - Basketball Courts / Gyms 5 - Racquet Ball Courts 4 - Meeting Rooms 3 - Weight room 2 - Aerobics 2 - Track 2 - Aquatics - Indoor Track - Indoor Ice Arena 7 - Year round capabilities 2 - Summer Roller Hockey - Field House - YMCA or similar facilities 4 - Teen Center 4 - Soccer facility 2 - Tennis Courts 2 - Indoor Skate Park - Indoor Playground (i.e. Eagan's "Blast") The survey results show that respondents feel that a community center, land acquisition, and sport complexes are the three most important facilities/actions. Land acquisition was the number one immediate priority followed by building sports complexes, soccer fields, an additional indoor ice sheet and baseball fields. 23 Farmington Recreation Facility Survey Comments / Students General Needs / Students (Additional comments from 68 surveys. Numbers indicate duplicate responses.) - Sustainable, revenue producing activities 1 - Improve park play equipment I - Trails, paved (for roller blading) I - Improve natural open areas 1 - More "neighborhood" parks 1 - Movie Theater 1 Outdoor Athletic Facility Needs / Students - Dog park 4 - Field lighting 2 - Baseball fields 1 - Rink hours extended 1 - Tennis courts, resurface 1 - Football field, tougher grass 1 - Frisbee golf 1 - Tether ball pole 1 Indoor Athletic Facility Needs / Students - Teen Center 8 - Tennis Courts 3 - Community Center 1 - Basketball Courts / Gyms 4 - Weight room 1 - Aerobics 1 - Stage / Theater 1 - Indoor Ice Arena 1 - GYmnastics equipment 24 / /a.- City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmin2ton.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato&f./',/'- FROM: Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Main Street Project - Trunk Highway 3 Considerations DATE: February 17,2004 INTRODUCTION At the public hearing for the Main Street Project that was held on April 7, 2003, (see attached Council meeting minutes) the decision to close the Main Street connection to Trunk Highway 3 was deferred. Attached with the minutes is the petition presented at the public hearing that was received by residents requesting the closure of Main Street. DISCUSSION As Council will recall, the closure of Main Street at Trunk Highway 3 was an identified goal of the Trunk Highway 3 Access Management Study that MnDOT performed in late 2002 (see attached study map). Also included is a memo from the City's traffic engineer regarding the proposed closure. It is staffs recommendation that the closure of Main Street be implemented, primarily for the safety concerns that the closure will address. If it is assumed that the closure is to be pursued at this time, whether or not MnDOT will participate in the cost will need to be determined. BUDGET IMPACT The cost for the closure was included in the overall budget for the Main Street Project. MnDOT's potential participation in this improvement has not been estimated at this time. ACTION REQUESTED Council review/discussion of the issue and direction to staff whether or not to pursue the closing of Main Street at Trunk Highway 3 as part of Phase II of the Main Street Project. Main Street - TH 3 Page 2 Respectfully Submitted, ~'n1~ Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file Council Minutes (Regular) April 7, 2003 Page 2 7. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Fitch, second by Soderberg to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approved Council Minutes (3/17/03 Regular) b) Received Information Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - Parks and Recreation c) Approved Appointment Recommendation - Human Resources d) Approved Appointment Recommendation - Police Department e) Adopted RESOLUTION R19-03 Accepting Donation Menasha Corp. - Parks and Recreation f) Approved Amendment to Curbside Recycling Agreement - Parks and Recreation g) Approved Temporary On-Sale Liquor License St. Michael's Church - Administration h) Approved Contract Riverland Community College Firefighter Training - Fire Department i) Received Information School and Conference - Fire Department j) Approved School and Conference - Administration k) Approved 2003 Federal Emergency Management Agency Grant - Fire Department I) Approved Street Sweeping Contract - Engineering m) Adopted RESOLUTION R20-03 Amending Fees and Charges Resolution- Community Development n) Approved Bills APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Main Street Area Reconstruction Project - Engineering The proposed improvements to the Main Street Project area include the reconstruction of streets, construction of new storm sewer and the reconstruction and upgrading of trunk and lateral sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer. The reconstruction of the street and utilities along Main Street also require street and utility improvements along 4th Street, 5th Street and Willow Street. Trunk storm sewer needs to be reconstructed along 4th Street from Main Street north to the river. Trunk sanitary sewer needs to be reconstructed along 5th Street from Elm Street to just north of the river to the MCES interceptor. It is proposed the improvements be bid as two ,separate projects due to the size .- and timing aspects of the projects. Phase 1 would consist of the streets and utilities along all of 4th Street and 5th Street north of the railroad tracks and Willow Street between 4th Street and 5th Street. Phase 2 construction would consist of the reconstruction of Main Street between 3rd and 8th Streets, 4th Street between Main Street and the railroad tracks, 5th Street from Elm Street to the railroad tracks and 6th and 7th Streets 1/2 block north and south of Main Street. * fDuring the neighborhood meeting on March 27,2003, a discussion was held [:egarding the proposal to close off Main Street at Trunk Highway 3. Residents Council Minutes (Regular) April 7, 2003 Page 3 f;: who spoke at the meeting were in favor of the closure and a petition was also J received. -* The city's assessment policy states that reconstructed streets and lateral utilities are assessed at a rate of 35% of the improvement costs. Assessments for new lateral street and utility costs are calculated at 100% per policy. Trunk sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main are funded from city trunk funds. Per policy the Council is limited to whether they can assess to the appraised benefit that the properties will receive from the improvements. According to the appraisal the maximum benefit received would be $6,000 per residential equivalent unit. For Phase 1 the actual assessed amount per policy would be $9,600, compared to the $6,000 which is sustainable. In Phase 2 there are two different numbers for the policy. Those that do not have storm sewer would be assessed at 100%, $17,200. Where there is already storm sewer, the assessment amount would be $11,300. The city cannot assess more than what the appraisal suggests. The total project cost is $5,290,000. The assessed amount would be $830,900, and the city cost would be $4,460,000. The costs would be funded with an improvement bond. An annual tax levy to support the bonds would be necessary to fund the 65% of the project costs. Councilmember Soderberg pointed out the difference in the amount the city is able to assess and the actual assessment, will be picked up by the city. He also mentioned the closure at Hwy 3 would just be the access onto Hwy 3, the frontage road would remain open from Willow Street. CCouncilmember Fitch asked if the decision needed to be made tonight regarding the street closure. City Engineer Mann replied it would not need to be decided tonight, as that part of the project would be done next year]Councilmember Fitch then asked how many other projects similar to this could be coming in the next few years. City Engineer Mann replied there are 4-5 projects. These projects would also include utilities. Councilmember Fitch asked if the city can afford to take on those projects, knowing we may need to eat 15-20% more assessment. City Engineer Mann stated one of the things to be accomplished this year is the pavement management program. The streets will be rated in the order they need to be repaired and costs will be estimated. Mr. Dick Hanson, owner of20 4th Street, asked what the life expectancy is of the improvements. Staff stated it is 50-75 years. The new PVC ripe for sanitary and storm sewer could be longer. Mr. Hanson then asked why 4t Street north of Main Street to the river needs to be redone as it was done 30 years ago. Staff stated it needs to be redone because trunk storm sewer needs to be installed. In 1997, it was identified the pipe needs to be upsized. This needs to happen before improvements can be made to the south. Mr. Hanson then asked why they are assessed when they have adequate service? Why assess them for another part of the city? Staff replied the storm sewer is totally funded by the trunk fund. They are being assessed for street and water main improvements. April 1, 2003 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: On behalf of the property owners on Main Street and adjacent streets, I am submitting a Petition for the Closing of Main Street at T .H. #3. Your favorable consideration of closing Main Street as part of the street reconstruction project would be appreciated. Respectfully submitted, .. QU~ Roger & Pat Christensen 713 Main St. Farmington, MN 55025 TO: PETITION FOR CLOSING MAIN STREET (tV, T .H. #3 The Honorable Mayor and City Council DATE: March 28, 2003 WE, the following property owners on Main Street and adjacent streets, do hereby petition the City of Farmington, to close Main Street at Trunk Highway #3. The reason for this petition for closing Main Street is due to the following: 1. The huge increase of vehicular traffic, 2_ The speed at which these vehicles travel through the intersection and do not stop at the stop sign at Main & 7th Street, 3. The use of the street by semi-trucks and other trucks even though the street is posted for no trucks. NAME Q~~ ~ t!L-..t~ ;Jf}4 ~~ <7 S" 4/ Ja. ADDRESS I 7/3 J7J~ 7/~ Yh~ $C ~(, P1f1"Y, S,t- lo/In fV1~ ~. /// ~r~ sr- . 7 ~~ ~fJ- '7D'7 fY7~ //tJ-Y~~ / j.? /' rt7J..,/ :too gO -I )1'1.,1/;/ TELEPHONE # J.43- Hffl t:,S-/ -l//'3-Rt/J'9 (,)"/- Y'o-.flt' ~-q Id}-g 1l.D 10 b5'I-~> - ~4-1 w7-~J- fjL2'S- 'SI-~3-8'31o I {'57-'7~3/;JJ~~ $J lf~;..i.id' 65/"'Y~O-6Y/Y tJk3-- d3d..S t.fto -r7lJ. PETITION FOR CLOSING MAIN STREET ~ T .He #3 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council DATE: March 28, 2003 WE, the following property owners on Main Street and adjacent streets, do hereby petition the City of Farmington, to close Main Streetat Trunk Highway #3. The reason for this petition for closing Main Street is due to the following: 1. The huge increase of vehicular traffic, 2. The speed at which these vehicles travel through the intersection and do not.stop at the stop sign at Main & 7th Street, 3. The use of the street by semi-trucks and other trucks even though the street is posted for no trucks. \ ADDRESS IOD )fl- ~I';'t~f M7'>f~ff 5~r Md.;/! c.!Jrttf 5JD ~Y (:fj) /114;1., ! f. Zf) ~ 11"1 c;j ~ro 1~ st- , 7(j g vJ' 200 lO ( ,..., AI\! S"T. . TELEPHONE # ;j 1...3 - 'fj 1-/ () fC.3 -8' q a5 ~1t6-t9~ 40J-7qo/ t( 1;; -lI?J7 4fdJ~0Iq2- 1-I-0~ 4100.- ro '-j I t../ .-::Jh~ 8",\t)\ ,O=roo -=- AnderIik & 1\11 Associates EngIneers & ArchItects Jnter-Office Memo To: Lee Mann From: Shelly Johnson Date: 02/11/04 Re: TH 3/Main Street - Access Management Project No. 141-04-000 The City of Farmington is presently considering the closure ofa local street, Main Street, at its' intersection with TH 3. This closure was a part ofMnDOT's study of access management along a portion ofTH 3 in Farmington. TH 3 is a very important north-south arterial to the City of Farmington. Proposed growth to the north will increase the importance of that roadway and the traffic volumes will increase over today's daily volumes. For instance, the Seed/Genstar AUAR indicated a 2002 daily volume of approximately 10,000 vehicles. The projection to the year 2020 was estimated to be approximately 26,000 vehicles per day. The present four lanes on TH 3 in the vicinity of Main Street will not be increased beyond that present cross-section. Therefore, it is very important that the capacity of that facility be protected. One method of doing that is to manage the access to/from the facility. Studies have shown that access management that includes closure of some streets and/or driveways or consolidation of access does improve the roadway capacity. Additionally, and quite importantly, access management decreases the crash potential along the major roadway affected. We are quite certain that nobody would dispute that. Main Street from TH 3 westerly is a local residential street. The street has numerous north/south connections to Elm Street (CSAH 50) which would allow for more safe access to/from TH 3 via the signalized intersection of TH 3 and Elm Street. The closure of Main Street at TH 3 will not create any undue travel time disruption for those persons along Main Street. The overall benefit to the operation of TH 3 far outweighs any perceived disbenefit for Main Street residents. The creation of a more safe TH 3 is a very positive step. Emergency vehicle access does not appear to be unduly compromised by the proposed closure of Main Street. From a traffic operations and safety point of view, we support the proposed closure. If there are any questions concerning the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. www.bonestroo.com o St. Paul Office: 2335 West Highway 36 SI. Paul, MN 55113 Phone:651~3&4600 Fax: 651~36-1311 o Milwaukee OffIce: 1516 West Mequon Road Mequon, WI 53092 Phone: 262-2414466 Fax: 262-241-4901 o Rochester Office: 1127" Street NE Rochester, MN 55906 Phone: 507-282-2100 Fax: 507-282-3100 o Willmar Office: 205 5th Street SW Willmar, MN 56201 Phone: 320-214-9557 Fax: 320-214-9458 o St. Cloud Office: 3721 23'" Street S SI. Cloud, MN 56301 Phone: 320-251-4553 Fax: 320-251~252 o Libertyville OffIce: 1860 West WoncI1ester Rd, Libertyville, It 60048 Phone: 847~16-1631 Fax: 847~16-3762 J'; Proposed Action . Close street connection to TH 3 . Close frontage road connection Open Spruce Street to TH 3 New street connection ~M. A o 100 200 300 Feet - -----' ;i" TH 3 Access Management Walnut to Main Streets ~ I II u=n-Ji ------- " 3RD =:J n (f) I~ l> :r: l> I~ z L I I I I ~ '-' 0 J L G "-= 4TH 4TH '" I ") 7TH ../ I ~ ~ -- ~ - ~ '01 ---:::, c 6TH 1 :1 r . -1 0- .......llr-- . L_ ,L___JI ! ,! I I; : I j II i i I --1 ~ 1 I . : I~ -~! r U:::: _ _:=U l ~rl _2J r' ~ ~-- 5TH r n- I ~ I I o ~ l ' I U .6T~ ___~ 1511 I, ! ' I i I ; I ----I.,. I L-- -_ I i I ! I / I '-- ~ 7TH I I o ~ ~ [ 7TH --0 Z m .';;<T~ ~ / o? a.. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us FROM: ~~t/ Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator I~--- Jim Atkinson Assistant City Planner TO: SUBJECT: East Farmington 8th Addition Final Plat DATE: February 17, 2004 INTRODUCTION John Anderson of Giles Properties, Inc. has requested approval of a Preliminary and Final plat for the East Farmington 8th Addition. As shown on the plat, 33 single-family residential lots are proposed. The proposed development is located north of East Farmington and south of the St. Francis Campus within the City of Farmington. The parcel is zoned R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential) which allows for a minimum of6,000 square-foot lots, minimum lot widths of60 feet, minimum setbacks of 20 feet in the front and 6 feet on the side and rear yards, a maximum net dwelling unit per acre of 5.5, and a maximum lot coverage of 30%. Plannim! Division Review Applicant: Tim Giles Giles Properties, Inc. P.O. Box 51 Elko, MN 55020 952-461-3984 Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. Plat Application Resolution Preliminary & Final Plat Grading, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, and Street Improvements Location of Property: Located north of East Farmington and south of the St. Francis Campus along Oak Street. Area Bounded By: Single-family residential to the south, west, and east, and an assisted living facility to the north. Existing Zoning: R-2 - LowlMedium Density Residential Surrounding Zoning: R-2 to the west, R-5 to the north and PUD to the east and south. Existing Conditions: The property is vacant with a pond/wetland that exists on the east portion of the property. Lot Coverage and Sizes: The maximum lot coverage for an R-2 zone is 30%. minimum lot size for the development is 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot width is 60 feet measured at the front setback. The The yard Topography: The property is relatively flat. Wetland: A wetland exists on the east side of the property. DISCUSSION The applicant proposes to plat 33 single-family lots in the East Farmington 8th Addition. This parcel was platted as an outlot in the original East Farmington development and was not a part of the original PUD. Therefore, the mini-park configuration platted in the original East Farmington development is not required in the East Farmington 8th Addition. Lot Coverage The maximum lot coverage requirement in the R-2 Zoning District is 30%. Given the size of some of the proposed lots, it may be difficult for some future homeowners to construct decks, sheds, or additions. Therefore, the City should require notification by the developer to potential purchasers to avoid potential conflict. A condition of approval is included below that addresses this concern. Access to St. Francis Property Two (2) access points are provided along loth Street and II th Street through the 8th Addition to the St. Francis property to the north to accommodate future development. Until such time as the St. Francis property develops, hammerheads would be constructed on the St. Francis property to allow vehicles to turn around. In order to accommodate the hammerheads, the developer must secure easements from St. Francis. The developer will provide documentation of the easements prior to the Council meeting on February 17, 2004. A condition of approval is included below that addresses this issue. Sight Lines East Farmington 8th Addition includes two (2) lots located on the west side of 9th Street. According to the City's traffic engineer, visibility from these properties is limited due to the proximity of the curve in 9th Street. Three (3) conditions are recommended to increase safety for the future property owners and those who use this portion of 9th Street: a) Install appropriate signage as recommended by the City Traffic Engineer, b) Install turnarounds on the driveways for each of the two lots, and c) Ensure that boulevard tree placement does not interfere with sight lines or sight distances. Application of these conditions would be reviewed during the building permit review process. A condition of approval is included below that addresses these recommendations. Drainage and Utility Easement A drainage ditch currently exists on the St. Francis property adj acent to the north boundary of the 8th Addition. As shown on the plat, the developer has provided an easement to accommodate the drainage ditch. Since the easement is located on the St. Francis property, the developer must secure the easement from St. Francis. The developer will provide documentation of the easement prior to the Council meeting on February 17, 2004. A condition of approval is included below that addresses this Issue. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 13, 2004 and continued its review to February 10, 2004. The Commission unanimously recommended approval of the plat contingent upon several conditions that must be met prior to City Council approval. The applicant has since submitted revised plans that have addressed the majority of the conditions. The remaining conditions are listed below in the following section. ACTION REQUESTED Consider the attached resolution approving the East Farmington 8th Addition Final Plat contingent on the following conditions: 1. The Developer shall obtain a hammerhead easement from St. Francis, in a form approved by the City, providing for the location of the hammerheads until such time as roadway connections are constructed (if the roadway connections are not provided, the hammerheads would be permanent). The Developer shall provide documentation of the easements prior to City Council approval. 2. The Developer shall obtain a drainage and utility easement from St. Francis along the southern portion of the St. Francis property to encompass the existing drainage ditch. The Developer shall provide documentation of the easement prior to City Council approval. 3. The developer shall address the sight line issues for the two lots on the west side of 9th Street by: a) installing appropriate signage as recommended by the City Traffic Engineer, b) installing turnarounds on the driveways for each of the two lots, and c) ensuring that boulevard tree placement does not interfere with sight lines or sight distances. These conditions shall be reviewed by staff upon submission of building permits for the two (2) lots west of 9th Street. Building permits shall not be issued for the two lots until these conditions are met. 4. The developer shall notify potential purchasers of individual lots that the lot coverage requirement may limit or prohibit future construction of decks, sheds, or additions due to the size of some of the lots within the East Farmington 8th Addition. Notification shall be provided in the purchase agreement or separate contractual document signed by the purchaser. Proof of such document shall be provided to the City. 5. Execution of a Development Contract between the Developer and the City of Farmington and submission of security, payment of all fees and costs and submission of all other documents required under the Development Contract. 6. All engineering issues shall be addressed and approval of construction plans for grading, storm water and utilities by the Engineering Division shall be granted. Respectfully submitted, q~~.. Jim Atkinson Assistant City Planner APPLICATION FOR PLAT REVIEW DATE /2 ~ 7-tJ j , PLAT NAME E~l>+ h'vV'--':~ 4~ ,e-fU ~gl7c>-c'-{ LOCATION Ol.A-f'/P+ tJ/ €~rf h;--JL;~"'" /5.";- 4z:/~'p~ AREA BOUNDED BY ('1 +v~1 a~ ~ St.vJ-t, / ~ ,-.-ciTe""'..;t.... C"i JI1a,' ~ Sf- cN"\' . O~(/,' TOTAL GRO S S AREA /0, 7,p.s-1 a-vt' <; ZONING DISTRICT(S) f(- '2 Lo'-"/..f-/ft~'~- /),vt,,; ~ ~eh'd..J-c.l~ NAMES & ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS Sr, FYw.-o~1:; ~ If/., ~v/c.rJ /;01 A/lAJd-t ~ ~,'is !'v'~/~s kc. fo 8,,,,, S-/ &11..0 #(AI.>TC;Zd I !I1QYt'/''7 /h)/ S7..Zh7 I ' PHONE: ,~t~: 5.- j.J"Z- <I, /- >1' R Z Sri rYcw-t:, f- 32- 6 - s-Pf -/7-7C) NAME & ADDRESS OF LAND SURVEYOR/ENGINEER 10 ~ 0 {.'lI...tvf 11-~5c:1C.J'ct -k $ .;Zoi ~hs-f T".."-lIcle.t's IVac~( S vi4 2..00 PHONE qSz.-i"-Jt{-3rJYS 13LivVl ~ t/~. (/ 1::: ntlf/ S 5' 3:3 7 '35"0' NAMES & ADDRESSES ot ALL ADJOINING PROPERTY QT,.i"NERS AVAILABLE FROM: ON: PLAT REVIEW OPTION: PRELIMINARY & FINAL TOGETHER: PRE PLAT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE: x IN SEQUENCE: PRE PLAT SURETY: I HEREBY CERTIFY TRAT I &'1 (WE ARE) THE FEE OWNER(S) OF THE ABOVE LAi.'ID, TRAT THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT HAS RECEIVED A COPY OF TITLE 11, CHAPTERS 1 THRU 5, ENTITLED "SUBDIVISIONS" Ai'ID TITLE 10, CHAPTERS 1 THRU 12 ENTITLED "ZONING" OF IRE FARMINGTON CITY CODE AND WILL PREPARE idE PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. ~d~ SIGNATURE~ ER . J f.l -c;J -...tJY- , DATE ADVISORY MEETING: 1 . SKETCH PLAi.'l 2. STAFF Ai'lD DEVELOPER CONSENSUS J.i/~O r...t../;;.--fl7:;-O t i {t~ ,"-- to-/" c~,_ j~ ~"'::.> ,L RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING OF FINAL PLAT EAST FARMINGTON 8TH ADDITION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 17th day of February, 2004 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member _ seconded the following: WHEREAS, an application meeting City requirements has been filed seeking final plat review and approval of East Farmington 8th Addition; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the preliminary plat on the 13th day of January, 2004, preceded by 10 days' published and mailed notice, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS; the City Council reviewed the final plat on February 17th, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be feasibly served by municipal service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above final plat be approved and that the requisite signatures are authorized and directed to be affixed to the final plat with the following conditions: 1. The Developer shall obtain a hammerhead easement from St. Francis, in a form approved by the City, providing for the location of the hammerheads until such time as roadway connections are constructed (if the roadway connections are not provided, the hammerheads would be permanent). The Developer shall provide documentation of the easements prior to City Council approval. 2. The Developer shall obtain a drainage and utility easement from St. Francis along the southern portion of the St. Francis property to encompass the existing drainage ditch, in a form approved by the City. The Developer shall provide documentation of the easement prior to City Council approval. 3. The developer shall address the sight line issues for the two lots on the west side of 9th Street by: a) installing appropriate signage as recommended by the City Traffic Engineer, b) installing turnarounds on the driveways for each of the two lots, and c) ensuring that boulevard tree placement does not interfere with sight lines or sight distances. These conditions shall be reviewed by staff upon submission of building permits for the two (2) lots west of 9th Street. Building permits shall not be issued for the two lots until these conditions are met. 4. The developer shall notify potential purchasers of individual lots that the lot coverage requirement may limit or prohibit future construction of decks, sheds, or additions due to the size of some of the lots within the East Farmington 8th Addition. Notification shall be provided in the purchase agreement or separate contractual document signed by the purchaser. Proof of such document shall be provided to the City. 5. Execution of a Development Contract between the Developer and the City of Farmington and submission of security, payment of all fees and costs and submission of all other documents required under the Development Contract. 6. All engineering issues shall be addressed and approval of construction plans for grading, storm water and utilities by the Engineering Division shall be granted. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 17th day of February 2004. Mayor Attested to the _ day of February, 2004. . City Administrator z o - I- - Q Q <C :c~ I-~ Q)~ z~ Ot: 1-0 19~ Z .S: -~ ~~ It it I- ,3 f is ~ ~ .. . u z - ". U) ILl - ~ ILl a. o It a. U) ILl .J - 19 1- '" ..,.. In 10 po.. ~ J. :;; i f - ~ ! ;; ~t! z ~ ~ ~ B..~ I ~ ~ ~~; ~ ~ '" CI) 8 8 ~ ~ ~a zit", ~ h ili # ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ",0 a ~ 8g ~ l;l i!: _" ~ ~ ~_ :q:: a ~ S:: ex: ~. ,...,~ ~t ~ I:-: ::s ~ 0.. ~ CI)~ ).. ~ tJ ~ ~ !~ lLJ 1.1 .~? Q:: ~ CJ) ~ '0: ~ IJ... '" J....: <:) e ~ ~ ".... CI) ~ ~ ~ ~CJ) ~H ~ h ~ ~ ~~ . ~ ~ P:: ~ gf : Clct II I Io....! ~, ! l ~ ~ n, Q:l} 0 aZ ,,~ 'Uod~~~ ,^;s., ~ ~~ ~ ~~ v-J lLJ ....... i~~ ~~ ~ filL. .~ a....~], ~~ rrc'" Cf) ~ ~ ~~i '-J ... ~ 8 '" ~ ~ ~.. ... ~ ~ ~ i~~ :; ~ Cc: <:) t5~ .~~ ~ lk:: ~" .......... ,,'t!..~ ~ a oJ c;~~ H ci: ... ,1 (!)~ ~ Z I!! Z . - .. ~- .~ ... E ! ~ ~ .. .~ ... ~ ~ ~ ;:l .!! I'ol fIl Il., :s } 't! ... d 1i t..l "-1 "-1 ~ SCINl'I:IWHWI1 n oH1Vd 0I<<)d """"""'"' , ."" ..I~~ ~ .N ~ ~~ '6 .f\I ]<{~~ ~ ~.!. ; ~: o ~.:: ; 5~ =a .~ z " ~" til~.:~ ~C: Ii' ~~~<<<<~. :~ ~-i~~ !~ i~It.oID' t.l ~~~ ~~ ~~~ <02 ~~~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ o. _. ~ ~ I ~~ Ii . . "'I!! ~ liliUilltllt llt d~~~~ h ~ ~99991o.),; ); ~uuU ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ :Po~ ~ Q <:>> C\ics ~ ~ r;:r;:r;: Jr .It .It.lt.lt i :! I~~ ; ~ ~~;: i~t ,~ ~~ .. ~~.~ i ~~ ~L ~ ~ ~~ ~~ h ~ Il~ ~:!:.clal ~ ~ IX to. to. ~ ~~~~:l:l ~ ~.lhail ~ ~ hi I ~ ~*' g_~ili ~ :: e:i' ~ f~~~; ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .I~~~W;:~--. --~--' !~ ~:, := -.I. In..n "" J~ - ~~.I@ w 7 Ill!!!] :i~ ~ ~ . 11 h is ~~ -i ~t; . fi ~ a .: f~ ~'~ i:l ~~ fi !is ~h ~~ ~; ~ ~~ if ,~ I ~, !~ i! ~! 3 e~ "' ~ ~g ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ! ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ I~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ f '~~li.l ~ ;ill~a I il~~~~. ~ ~~~- ~ hm~ ~ ~ .2 !~~~ ~;l ~~~~ ....lS-~ ~~~J "~ll": ~E:~.g- dh8 ~ ' ! ~~'l!w'l!!~ w \j ~3:::1z:J~~ bl ~z P~~~~;3in~ ... 0 ffi =i :z :(' 1-]: I- ~ i~~C!~i~~j~~ ~I x I ! ~ ! I ~ i ~ .. I i i i I ! ! . ~ l<>i 1 I j j I r I I I . ! I~ 1 I j i ([:1 IL:J I [-J' II-:~~ II-.~~ I t:~; L[.:l~ .....-~'=-- Li'i' i:;J"~ ,,~ 5_52 52: iii; i: ~'~1 t. ~j~~ ~~ I~hi ~: ~~~~ ~~ ..~..~w. ~w ~;~ ~J~ ,J ~d~~~~ cil~i~~lg , ~ ~ II ~ ~ i~ ~ ~$j. ~ ~" ~ ~! w~ ~ ~: ; ~~ 8f i ~:il ~ (1~ ~! !i i Y I; : ! I I! T I 1 i i NV1d NOI!:lO~J.SNO~ 1""_0 \<>> . i!l ;~\ ~ ..,....... 'MJ1Mi7 ~ ,.. .......... .......,. .... :tit ....uo .H.-HI(.n;.i:r .,n'";...; ,...."NlI_ _....~~...,. 'JNI 'S3IH!3dOlld S311~ '!!OJ N" 'NO!~NI"lft' J NOIlIOOV HIB NOI~NlrillV ~ ISV3 , ~ I ~~ " "'---1 Ui? = 1 = ~ ~~~ 1 I ~ "",-j . I I ,-1-"1-'-1--' I , I I I, I I I I I I I r-ILiL-Lr-l' j--1-TL-I-irL-l I ~.J~.l_L-r-i I I I I 1-- -1.11---1 1---111 L _-., r-l I [I I- -1- -l I 1;1 I I I I1I1 I ).. I I I r---j --j r---j I ^' ---/ I J l.Jll-1l-c~=::-_/ -,...JT-I-l'LIJ !r-rl-,-( ',/ I I .'.....1.....'. ,.. 'j.... ..., ...."1...'" ,...".. I II - I I \ / " -.I l"~vu.l":~!1 "':'1''''''- I ~.~':'F"''''''':~ .:.1":::1 L L '- j.""- LL - U . L . I ..J. ::J . 1-' I . i . L' -- t- ' ~ ....~ ~ 8 ~ l>I t:: ~~~ :;: " I I I I I I ---, ~-r-I"", I . -I I I I ". I I hLi_L-( //\ I - .51 I -<..... --\ I w_ -., ~ I I _ - I I--~ I :":j:;l~F=h--=~ I I I I I l- I- I- I , I I I , I I I --, 1-' I . _-I I I I, ~; L_.L_.J--' I ;':--j I I I u: I '-I -I I I: --I '-I I r-T-L.._.J --, I I I, -I I L-I' '=j ... :;: ui l~ I I I I L-----l I I I 7' I 1// / L__ I / UI V~i( ~ ~e !5 ~a: g ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~l;l ~ a g! j ~'< ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~i lS~ .:Jl ~ ~ ; ~ !. ~~ ei ~ i u ~ CQ ~ 00 ~~ ~~~~ nh~ e d I!! ~ li H ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~... ~ iT -,- -,- -,- -, - I. I I I I I I I I I ...L_LL_I_-1 I I I 1 I \j ~ ~ ~ 3 3 ~ ~ ~ 3 i ~ ~ ~ i d 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! F ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ " ! ~ ! , if ! ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ i ~ ~ . ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w . ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ e~ ~ ~g g ~~ ~ j ~u i : ~ll ~ ~~~ u~ ~n +....:01 \ ) II ~ ONn.:t ~ 6eH-~-i>" . o ........",.MJIUa~..... ~ n.:t .um ~ tAu6!s ....... ......., _ IUJ ...,go ~= ~f\? ~~ ';";~:'''..:.=i ":)NI 'S3IHl3dO!:ld S3'1~ ~ ),8 NMWll .\01S~:'U::; 1ft ..,... ~ ~ ..., ,. :MQ.:J satrn:tWNlInl Vd (JfOd l ~ AS t<<lISlQ.L'I WO I lCKn PUO uomuadM ......, ",.., ........... ...,. ........--. .. Nn 'NO.L~NI"~V J - ,,,. ~ <0/00/1:1 "'... 'J,l;;.....'::' ~ ~ = "11Uf 'SBII1!::IOSSV , JBJlHO UlIOf NOIlIOOV H18 N01~NII'I!:lVj 1SV3 V- . ',c' I ~ ...L. L I It ..L ...J I L- -'- - -:JJ I ~ , ! -------l~SHlt~----L:----lnlU.SHl;I------_+r_=-=-- I. {)IJw' ~-t I I I I I I I I 'I l ..J l..'" J~~ I~ i" ,. '. ~ t 1 _" a I:! ~ l~' . -t-- I" 1': J ~"~ -'N ..... :0 , ~z :10 J: :~ , :a , '0 r M 11- 0:: II ~ ~ u >: ,- ~::. t~~l4 ~ -. 2 1 V1d A~VNIIll13~d .,~ .rt>D -, '. ~-~ r'-81 rf~-r-'1 . glj ;;gll&I,. gl , .,~! ~ I "1= &1 I IJ-i!il \ ,0 alllO . ill (\ .Oil \.e_",=-_.J b~d b'!\.d ~ orlft1.~~ lilt ...~ : ~~~I '<: t'!\ : "-~ @t"~ ~ ' \ ~ ~~llai~ ~'!I o! \ II "i"~~ ~I ::> $8 ~~.~;' .;. C) '.\ _, ._"'.._ . _ ;~~ ~, ~'\ d!W ~ ~ 1'iii!.~1 ~~ ;:-.... " ".. !~~~Io; [fl~ ,i~~1 .~ "':::J- -1~) ;:'" ----,'-.....;...----- -- - - - - --:~-=--- --- - ~"" ~ ,-' ! \ " \, ~ -'0' . . I , I t. I ~Ho::o::o::o:: n O::i ~~~~<<~tQ:~ $ll ~i.~~ ~~ ~ I'::,::~ori~ t~ ~ ~.. ~o:: ~i::~ ~o ),,~~ <0- ~ i ~ II ~~ ~ h ,,;;;~.jm ei is' ~n~h ill i~ d"" ~~ ~ ~o~ ~ococ...);: ); ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ . ~ ~ ...uti l! ... r~: ~ ~ ~;o~ ~ ~ ~:c\ ~ ~ tS<io:s ~ 0:: 0:: ttitlt .:: ..... ~'~ .t .:r ,:".tt .:t~ ~ ,- , ::! .e~ ~~l! ,- , a ~ =~~ n . ~.- : .~~ = ~ \ ~ ~ ~~; i!lil ~;~ ...... e~ ~ \[!!1!\ - ~~t ,~l \@ III . 10' ~IO " ~i;~ ~ ~~ !!!!!l \ q l'>1 2~ ~~ ~ l'>", ... .e ~ ~~~~~~ 0,; I: ~~ ..; l'> ~~ (~ ~ ;:~ ~i h ~ ~I ~I ,,,, i ~i!l e s. . ~ ~ 0' ~' ~ 1;~ ~ ... i~i' ~i '" ~~~j Q: ~ 0: 0 !s~i !I r r -iil- - ~ ~a ~ l.lt Ii It~ ~ ~;2 ~~~~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~~~!:! ,. r" '. r I" I .~~i~ i .... t!;- a - il~ ..liil~ 3~l~ ~l~~~~~.. ~~~~~ ~ ~~i~il " ~~i~ ~~~ ~H 8.; ~~~~~ ~ ;.l~ ~ .2~at: ~~~~::;~i~ M.~ ~ - ~' i"O i"Og &"08 d ...8 Glll$llI:IlioolQa"" = ] . ! i!l ~ ~ " l! ~ .. .. . ~ ~ ! ~ I . ~ .....~ ~ ~ .!. . ~ .:: ~ a d z " !/ ." " o~ i= ,-, .-, <): fh <.: -', ", "'. ... .1 ~~~ a'o 11_ ~ s,-81 r---m ,--, g I ~C ~\ Is ~i!ll ., Is ~ I .,!~ ~Il~ ... !~~ll "':: I~ ~I all ~II ,0 I ---- ~-~d 1;bi!-;=l ,~~;;;:j ,- "Tl "I ",;C ~ =1- ~I ~I il;, = <liCli j"1 ; L.!!..-~~~_~ ;, ..1 ". ~i ~I enu J.DMoOOII L ---~------------- :......:::::::-4. : i ~i .~":."'.....:.-..::---- - , ,. , y=: .- : .- / , , ~'I ;i~ hg , , , , , , , , , , \, d_ I " I I "-'--~ I ~.- I .d I ~l~ ~:- : -""l ~I \0) " i!l ;~\ ---T I I I ~: :~~ t., ,_, , ~~: ~:~ :'l <I: ~:~ ~ ~l_ "':1: ~:.~~- _ ~~l~ ~~~ ~I Ill, ~I I I , I .', ~'--- ~-- ~ ~:~ ,', ~':--- l33lll.S - -.mil' '.' -.----- f-- '.' ~ -;~ ::: ;~': ,,- <': 133lU.S ---""Rr6: T I I I I -, I L__L__ :!!OJ ~......----,..,......---.... Nn 'N01~NlrnfV.; .:JUt 'SBI11!OOflflV , JB"HO UIIor NOll100V Hill NOWNlrl!lVJ lSV3 j) -~'cc' 1 '-_.....l~--:-...L___L_-1J ' lJt-_..L__-l_--'---'--_.J...._-:Y I r I I !1----------J.33lU.SiUU--L:------=:;-...;;~,;,---- 1'1 -=-- z 'HJO'W1O.JO 3NIJ)--. Z I -r I , ~I ~' !I II' ,~ I I ,- I 1 I >-- -~. I Hlll I ::: I , I I il "" ~I , I , I .. .. ~ ~ I i !l .!. .. . ~ .:: ~ ~ z ~ '" co -- 'M1Yd lH),f NOUdIl105llI , I 1 ..J . ~~~ ~I~ ~~" ..J!i l '" J:J I': -1:: I" ., l-: -/:: u I" t: J 'N }..... , :0 'z .:~ J: . :~ : :~ t :0 .\ ~ '" ~ ~ !i~~ ~:'l ~.s i; Q ,""~:si .." ~_. ~r,t.~ "~'i'". o~~~ ~h~ ~ Id I01l ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ <~~ i ~ ~ "'~I 2: ~ ~~~t~ ~ Cjw",~~ ~ Md~ ~ ~ h ~ I ~ ~i7 ~ ;n2i~~ q 1-,1':'% ~ ~a,~ . ~~~l~ ~ ]1'" ~:'ON :nJ ~:l"1IJJ.X]1 ~:]"IU!)MO ~;AS~ ...__:).8 NMWO I ~:A8N!)1SJC] ~ to/90/l: =JJ.'t'O -"".....-~ ....,.. ~'do ~ ........ .' ~~.~..P- am puD1 pesuear1 ~ WDt\DlApUD~ 1 W JllpUn JO :MIl .<q p&lDdald ~ uotd s!'Q lD&A .<m-o ~ I HOlJltS NO'lVOW^ lN3!'3SW3 .......... ........, wtMM4,.. ) ...,....... ....,.. ... :tit ...,go ~nijJ,-ii-i...;d _Nlf_ ..."...~~.Jlj.. 'ONI 'S311!l3dO!ld S311~ ~ ~ o !> . .-., . 1'; j~:~~~~{ .-:".C_n'~:---__~~ t."t-., .,~l. 'I; '--5l;t!t~i~ ~ -" i ! r-;==-~~ ---- 1Lf=.__~ I~~u!~--- .'. , ,= i' (;--: I~ ~ I /@ ~ ~ ,!}!!!] I I~ \l i!! i! ... ~ "' il ~ 01 ~i,/I i:~ I i~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I h_ I ", 1 ------- "I !q ~.~~ i!~~il5 ~!!~1I h~@. ~~~ sh 1-- , , L.l._" II ~ t .. ~ iii jU .- " . ~~~ ~h ~~" t~~~# , i-- . " ,., ~ :1, ,. , '"' ~ / /7/ / / / / I .1 "'/tIJ -is ':J; I / / / \cn . ~ ;..\ ---T I --- I '" ;:: I ,_~ ;:~ I ~;";~L :~= ,', ....- ..-.. ;'1 .;): ~:~ ,. ~:/ ~...- - u . ~:~~- .:): :~: ~.i.~ r-- . --I- I I I I ___L t! fn ;;! ~:~ ,', -:I~ -- ~_. J.33lU.S - --,uoc ~--- ,--- '-' ~ -;" ~~-- ::: ~.i._ fn 1DlIlS ----m: T I I I I I I L__L__ - _.J 'I~' '- ... ( ~ oJ )L J....\... , 'I;'~ i Ii \ I~,-!:, -::" " "-" \ ! " ii _ _! ~~I ili I. ';JV -- ^'''\ '. {;:: -~~-:::>, I"~ ,',Jit'i"~1 ! ,;::.> \ '-....'" -~,-\, '\" \ "\1 I, ff -::.....;:-',,~ - 0.- ii' \, \ " 'I" I, ,.:J , "~~;c<""\.\\" 1,1\ ,lffil '\~\-~~~~. .... \... \_\\-~','I --- I ~~:~.-.\ ~~.' " ';.-, 1-/ ~ ~f ~~ '''''\''',.}.\'' '\ \,\1', ~ ~ili ,:.; ( ~ "-I..". j: " ~i ~~-,~ '" I,. I ~ ~:;;"~!ii "'''''~..., ~ I ' b. ~~~ /i::i: ~w I.~ / ~ o~~ S13 ~iE I' I /' ~ ~~~:;;~ !O I i I N B;!!! ~*~ :;; II / :1 ~ ~~~ & t;j '-~ II j ~;~ ~~~ i~ t' I i ittg ~~!!l ~:I <( ~u .<l~ ::l~ ~ ~tt~ E~~ lal~ i ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ . ~i~ ~<~ o~ a;i ~ln8 ~8~ ~~~ a (1)5... i3(1)~ p:;>-<( ~~ ~~~ ~~g ~d~ o z'" tt~ ~..J ~~ ~~~ ~ i:J .,,~ alii 8;5 ;~a ~~8 J) I 'I l ...J l '" J J !I ~I ~;; ~;;- j'- ;I~ ; 5i i1 ! , , i " Ii /~'! l~ ~ :J: ~ Z a u \' :c;"=-~~ ~ g- "~ ~~~ W~~~__~ :e8J;;(:g~l!i =t~!~~o g!CltIl.5~ jli~:!!!~ ij~;h ~~!i:~ ~"'o~L :::~z->w ;15~~gr: ",a.o~t!i! ~i~~i~ ....a.W!i .l2 i:~~j~ g'~~~ B~ :h~ulLffi~ . iI!~:S~~!'~~ ~xiE iE~~ ~:i. J::1liil ~<~ ~~1D ~~~ ~~!! i: WUl~ lio F.~l- ~~ ~~~ ~~ @~~ A~ ~~. ~l;j ~i~ ;1 ~g~i:i -iil ..,o..g<i! U. ~;~~ Ii h"< ~~i is!:;;! i<15 ~l5i~ .~~ Ul2s~~ !~~ !3~! ~~i ~i~~ ~ee :il~ij.. ;ijSa ~3~F ~~bI ~'~i: ~~~ ~~~~ ~~:g ~~~~ n H!Yd IN)d ~ @ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ffiL ~ ~~ ~ ~~ 0 H~ ~ g x~ ~ ~ f~ : ~ i= ~ ~ ~11! " 5 q ~ ~i ~!iI ~ ~~ ~ ~ " ~~ ~ ~. ~~ i ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ....~ ~!! ~ ~Ii e~ >- ;~~;;~ l:Ia~g~ j! ~,".q;;< ~ = b ~~r~ ~ ~~~~~j!:~ 5i ~e ~ !~\!iE~~@I5~ ~~ ~ :t<'5;! 0 O~la,. iE~ <~~~~ ~z '~!!~I!!_ ~l3iE <~el! E~ ~~~ii o~ ~ ~~lii:13:~ ~ ~ ~~ g~!(i~ l!!~el=~ 0.... ~~ uf5::s<a ~~~glil5Qr-l5 ~l&Irn2~ ~~~~~ ~~~:;;rh~ lil~ ~~i5~ It~i~ "'~~~ ~~<I(,," ~!Cs~ ~ij ~~u Z~N asz...; 3~ <~ ~ e!f~ff zLoll!!e;;~i;; e~~ ! d-C:l5~1i 2t;a:~ ;i~l-o ~~!;! ; w~ldQ.....~~lf>: .~ ~~~~~ ~<2~~iI!~~2 i~ ~ ~~I!!.l3 dZol1. Cot;-- i~~ .. ~~~~~ o~~~~ ~~ j ~ ~ i~~gai ig~:i:uei~~ g~~ ;~=~~~~tn; ti~e ~ . 00 ~~~ ~~~~i! ~~<l~<l~:~~= ~~~ ~ ;lillDll ~ g~~i3~~~~oI~ .. NV1d 1O~!NOO NOISOll3 " J:)VNlVllO '9NKlV i .~ \01 . ~ ;~\ ! .......,. ........, ~ ,... .-.-. ......,.. m :Uf ....uo .Iii ;iiin:ii-;;o;:::HiiiiilJ" ( U1IIft NIl ....,...... , "'''''''''~~'~'lR' 'ONI 'S3IUI3dO!ld S3'~ , 11'" , ."" '" ~ !l! ~ < ~ ~ ~ u ~ .,,~ ~~ffi ~ e< <~!' ~~ d~ }j!~!l~o~ ~g 2~ ~u~1S~3 ::I)- :)& ~~lHz~a ~lD ~CJ ~"'Na",Z e~ .lo.i ~~~g~< ~G: ~~ 2~~~ -~ f~ ~~ i5~;~$ ~d ~~ ..,-g~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~!!ii ~~ ~~ ~ll!;;" L d! ~lL uuZ >w ~m ~~ <<~l5g~ 815 p~ ~~a~ t; ~~ ~, ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~. ~2~~"'~ ~~ 2* i:3~~~ r; !!!.... <<0< 3", a~ ~~ ~~~~;i . :!;;! u~ W...V1vtlD ~ ;!vt ~l= 1lt::a:6iti:@~ ~~ ~~ ~~i~ i~; I I 1 :1 [11; 1 fi= 1 12 I 1,/- ,(" /1 I I 1 1 I I I ~-- I j,'y'- -;,1 ),-. 'I i ~:~ ,_ 1 ,<, 1 I. " L. > !:}_. \,1 e ~<, J ~ ~3 I~:: f' ~ 'tlil ~~?il~ !; !~ ~~=- --...,~~-~, ~ ~~, .'-=~.f> s u~ --. "'11' 3 ~~ _::cJI"j'/.~,/,: ~~ !!i~. <',>o%~1 ..... _. _ ole i~~ a~/ :-, L f,. '",-1 ~~ ~a~ ~ ~~ "~'I """-, .\ \ " ~~ ~;~ :::\ r:<. -,\ " - ~~ ~<~ ,." \ I ,,' ~~ mii ~~; \ I" I ~s ~e~;:, \ 1 \ 1.2 ~~ ~:; :~: \\1 \.....dt!li : g~ It-l;!: _.L_ Ie -\ ~..<. 0< I ~ e- ~ili~:=; . ~i \ll ,', ~ 1 - I ';:'Li I 8 -1- -- , I I", 'I .......J I _1..__ I I '\ j .::::- ,-, '.' II; I=i fi. 12 ~ ~ & !l! Z 0 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ .,!Ii ......1= -~ ~~ ;: :s~ 2- :n~ ~~ ~~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iJ }j! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ i ~ ~~ ~ ~, i ~: ~ ~~ e B~ lJ , " " , ~'I!! ~ ~~~ffi iii ~i e58~i ~ ~~ ~~;a ~ ~~ :5~iti ~:~ ~iii ~ ~~ ~&~~ ~ ~~ ;~~~ ci ~~ ~~;~~ ; ;g~ ~~~~i ~ <~! ~~~:5~ ~ dl'! ~~~l!lg :j olfi u~o~f ~ :fc~ ~~~a~ ~ 2~~ ~~!~~ ~ s~~ <"''''~lii ~ ~~~ ~g~~~ ~ 3~6 ~~~:52 _~"l1-T-- I I I I I I L__L__ ~ ON:ru ---mn--.. ...~ x-----:ru J.X]J. JOlXX X ux)t Q = :::, =~..:;.;: ~"" 0MlI ~ ""'MUll ....-utl < Sor/d)t AS (J])C)Jt().\ uw. NIl .......... , ~J.8NMWC1~ alft~~ ",.......~~...,.. I vss-- AS Nfl6JQ I lIMA plIO ~ ......, ...., -.-.-. ,.., ........ ... ~ <0/60/.. 31'10 .... ':' ~ ~ = "aUf 'S91.poSS'" , J91lflO IJIIO(' -1 ..L L ..L ....J I , 31'10 l '" J ..I ~ ~~; ~l~ :;to,: ;I ~;; ~,,: ::r- N ... o z ~ :I: ~ a l,) e ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~.-a ge ~e~~ ~~iI ~~iI ~g ~~q~ ~~ ~d! ~j~ ~Ill~ ~8 ~=~~ f =~~u 0 ~ ~z~ ....i "g~a d' >li~1 ~wQ ~~~ ~ ~ p;.... ~f .n:t:.. :II~i ;:o! ~ a~~~ ~a ~iI~1!I ~~~ ~8. ~ ~~3o( ~~ lO:Q\~~ ~~~ ~a< ~ ~o ~!'! ~ ~~ ..~ Ii! ileu mi!:_ ~3 ~IO!~~ ~u ~tJ~~ ~RtJ ;J1il1ii~ .15~~ e;& ~~l:z lte~ 3:~ I 1= ~<:~<< 5~~~~' .jjjj~~ .i!:~ ~~~~ ~: ~u~ii! U~ ~~'=I!!~ ~.~ !'!hil ~u~, :;~!;~ btal= ~~ig~ ~a~ f~~~~ ~2:a ~~~ ~m~~~ n: ~h~ 015",. >0 >O~~~ >of/) ...~ ~ge;l ~=~ ~3i!i<li ~~~ ilb~ ~ ;< J i ~e~ ~ ~ ~I ll' e~~ ~e~ ~.~ ~~ . ~ ~~ ~ ~ <\nO lnljlll~!;i ;.:~ ~ ~ 1: d~ ~ i~~ ~~~ 'i~ t' = : i~ ~:~ ~:: :~~ ~~:~ ~~ : ~ ~~ ~t;;:; ~a~ ~~Ill~ :;;~~~ OR ~ z ~~ !O~~;;;5 if~~!; !H ~i! l!! ~~ ~ =..1i1 ~.~~ ll!"~ z.~ i ali:~ ~i~~ u""w Ulwt=.!:::15 e-lf!Ii. <~ ~ J-vo il.. ~ iI~1ll ~~!-< ~u ~ !!2llj 3j....>- ~~ .:of ~~.ltl ~<( ~g.~ ~~~ ! 11111' III, ili; "Il!: .:: i ~: ~ ~~: ~~~i ~~~; Ii :i: I~~ ~1!1 u~~ n~ ~~~~ ~v~ ~;~lf SlDo ~15~~ :l~~ i5~~ ilg" ~~.~ ~~~ ~ll'il3 ~~~ ~a:.i3i~ a~~ !~~i i~l~ gig~ >-i~t; g:~i5 ~ll!Y~ "~~~ ~~UI ~~ ~ ~15~~ ~~~ ~g:~* 3~2m ~"!7 :r~~i en! 8 ~~ol>l gg ! ;e;~ :-:~ ~J~ 0,-,_"0:::1-,', .,,~ -::; (( l~ - \<0 ~ i~' \~ ~~1iil c..ij!;~lIi ~~~.. ~8"~,; ~~~~~ ~ ~.. 5~~~~ ~;ll~Oa: ::I~Q~'. a~~~~ >d~ia: ~~~~~ !~~~; =~o~ iI~~~ ~<~ ~;jE8~ ~U:", 1::I1I1~l!' ~~g~~ i~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~83 ~~~mLo. e~~i~ h~~' V:lQ.<~ ~ i~'~ ~~ ~~i!!I!!~~ ~ ~:t ~ G~ ~~~~~o ~~ ~h~ ~ ~ t~h~:~~i <0 <A~:S0ll: W !I!"'ll:!2.~~lD~ .~ ~~f~ jl ~ a< "~3u~~~ ~~ ~~~- ~ ~ ~~=~~~~h~ I gill ~3~~.- ~ III -~a~~~~~:;;:;; j!;~ e;igl]; w ~lIi ~l! ~u:i~~~i: Vt7 ~Qr ii: j: e~ FII,.~i7iW~'" 2~ ~~ ;U~~ ~~ ~~ 5~~~:~~h~ lI'I>CI< VtFct:'" 10... V::l ~i5 ~m~~~ G~"~ ~:;;~~a3Ille~~ :~ ~~B"'~ ~g ~~ :lK~~~~~8;; ~i ~:~i~ ~~ ~~ ~~g~~~~ag~ .. ... ~ g ~ ~ ~ g~ ~ e h ~ i ~g ~ ... ~~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~'~~ ~ ~ !i~ ~ ! i;l~ilI~ ~ :i!:! ~ ~ ~ ~!t; ~ ~ ~~h: ~ ~~. ~ ~ l> iSa; ~~ g ~a~.~ -r-. ~~F:;;J.~ a:::- . . ,,-, '-' NVld All1l!J) 'ONI 'S3IUI3dO!ld S311~ I j-- ,-, .-, ,-, .-, -- '-' I r-- . ., ,., ,,- ..- I, LL_ .. :::I~ ,,' ... ,,- LL_ --, '" .., --, . ., " , -T- -.. , j-- u, u' ,-, '-' . " ", ~ -I !~~I J I III~ -~W ib \1 ~ ! ~ i '-.~ '" II I .. I ~ d ~ I ~ I ~ I .. ---T--O 1 I I I I I L__L__ _I ro-O& .WX;~ :oON 31l.:t~1 _l===l-- ' .l1lJ ~'N .... ' l-- 1dl'IRiilI'n!::' ~,., ..",,~')'OI _ ~_~_ " "::;,'" __ ,i __' ~,~I __"",\ ,___';:--..,1 ~---; ~ I _' ~ ,,,,,= ::::'.;:-' - · - - ........ ..;;.:;- J) ~"'!' ~ '_ .....~,,::I-. ,-....-= __....--1" \- ,~O ' , ' """" _ . _, - - · .. ' 'ON' '''"''''''''TI" - : ~ L ___-.:::~I'''..'--- " I I~'il _' ,L" -<II' -. 'i' ;;;;;;-~' · ,_I _ ,_rg~,~_ _ ,.' ' ~f- ~ ~ _I "'''''''' :1;-'-' :~\ ., "..., ,._ _ _,_... /:"'" _ ' ~ ~ ",,,,,.w,,,,, I. I J IJ HL~I ----" ~ "ill' I Ii ,I ,,' · ~- - on,- J ,~Ir.;' Ilr~T"" < _ ~ "'JIlC>L,~-?4.."13 \li.:.... I 1.. C ~LiJ ~ ~ / )~/ rr ~- ",:" ~ ."::~"- ~ '" "'~~~~=- -b~ ' : - ! j "', \' :f' . ;;-r_-:-: _-"_--- --=- ~.:E-;-~~ = =_ =-_ = ~ - - - - /-00<0::-" ,. f < ~." ~ j "" C-'- ( ,,:'Fo ___~ ' -- -,,,-' 3: ~. ,"", '"'" .1 '0' ' "" '\1(( ,"" - ' ",;1;1\ ,,--T ;;1':: li~" ""' .. ",,' ' - "',",,, ,z , 1'" ' ,_ --, '" ,\0' ,,:,+'} I:',' ,,- , ~:;! I" : n- _ ____.~' '"l __om ,,'I.- ,,,,,~ " ,'". ,0 " ' " ' . ",..\ 'II' ,,", ','" '. I " ~ , ~i~ ;~'1' ,,' ~ \ ;" "~\. i '!, !~~ ~ " ,::J.U r I ~ :",,=__";" ~~. ' ,I' ~" ' I~!I _J, I) ,___ _ -~-~-=~_ " ~~~e' .~ ,l:, 111 I;:' ~ !~~ ,r-' _ , .~~~~-.> ~ ,- - I ~~1Ii~i!Il'~ ---- ,.~i '- _ <~...... \ _':-~.-~' -Il91-- I I- - dE, ' " . ," , c::' ' . --.',' -, - ,. _, < I r ' I' I'll' - He. ' ' ' ", ' "...' , \' ,',,' ,........u, " i" __ -..- , A, ~ v~11!\'~' " \ ,.1- ~'I !. I.. }II(;'---:~~"" I 1-' '(- -, rr:-~ r '\\1111 n: "i"T--'- ,__ ,\' '" ~_/'"_ III' \, I ~ - -]t.~IT[,i "I~ r : I "^' ,\ '_"'_~v" ." ,I .,,: I . ' --" ,I ,,- , ,\. , ., I _ I~C\" @:__--" ""\ .,d' /' ' '" _,:.:i- ,'I' ,I.,. , I ',_, ,,~_-,_~\"'\" \\\ ~. 'I I ; rrl!' l~L->\ .. 1 I .. .". "'~-,'\'\' \ ",; ,,-.~'~ -, ',j, , I r,,,,,,,~,\,\'\\\Jj''' ~ do ~ " '. I t~: I I ''\\\~~'" \' if!!' q<"'''' - "~- L ,"''- ,d_ · _ On - I ,~,\.,,'" '1\' I .' It ' ,~, ~." \ '. -. ~ , ' , " I, I I ..c-- "'- ,.-, ~" '.'0',,-\ '/. /~' ~ .' ~.' --- ..,,",,",,'" r" _ ." '"I' I" ,r .." · A"" . '" ,,/" " " ;j; '. . I I ,. " / , ,,'" , '" " Ii/( I I.\.;i.~'~~- '2~GlI \ fj,=--- "II' 'lM' ," ----~ \l' '. Ir ' .:: '!' .",iI~ \: 1 Ie I Ii" :;': i II :":1 i: ~'I~"\ Ii \0. ~\ ~ \ ~r:u- ::~ , "II, .i! ~ '~I ---- ~== .1 :.~II.\! I If N ~,;. . l:,.-;l ,~I'\ ill " " I~:l / I r' I I? ~'- f![G / f-.~-- ',.:,:,/ .' I~.g,_j , . .11\" I ;:~ - i -,: f '!I" ' ! '.j;:: ~__ \J .1 ~ c:1 [I ~ I; 1;-::: .. ~J.2 f. I "'. I ~,~ _ f" ~ I-r '-"'-~ \ i ......g-,I,r.::.l',..= - -- .-~-=:--..:il ! 1-1 ' ,- -: ~..=--;f.." 111 i'WI,~ " , "?'/ ~"-- .~=, "",,;,,' ~ ,.- - _._"fIT, ' I + reF' ,_.l3Jlll.S -'~~'!I' ' " " ,--- - ..'~' ":fAi ~ :~. ,-Iii ,T. I. \.. ' V ~-- m<c:'" ~L"'" <,.~,.j ,'I ) 'i' r '.- ~g\ ~'f:'~~\ 'I, ,-- i;I~~~" '1J, -> L' I ,1 i ~---- ~~l \ I"" --, - - , 1\\.,:1-' --'-"'\ ,... " \ ::. \ , " ~ - - , J!, I~:; ~:: \ I \ jil~ / / G 1 hi-:;:--- -T- \1 '-, ".' )Ir / / I CD. ". ,...11 _.L_ \ '" ; <i.~ I ,. I~ f--' ", "V ' ' ==, ,_ \r1, !~I) , ~,,: H f-rfl--- C ,- .: jj\ 'I " ; !' o' II' 4'1 In : i! ,'~ :t~j'~, .. i , -'I, --- ,il l~ I ~.<OO- ~"'L is' 'J:;, : I "I ,!i' ~i'l ~ " ~ I ~ I I !~. \('.2"i- ~ G~ \1 l,- L I 9- .~ ITT '_ c: ,\ - 1 -- " II : 11. ' t'.l.~ ",,-':-' .:~.:. b,J I 'i- .""- I ~\ I i: I ,j _90', I I~ >11 ',.l3Jlll.S .L ' HL6 : , ",-i ,/. < - rf2,z ;T, -;; , I- T ' : / .-CBI ,t ~jJ1C' - : 1 " +--.- kJ-~900- ~l' I" I " ,j" 1-- / 'II \ 1 I I=L-'" :11 \il I __ \L L ,- II--- I II ~ ~ /I II .,J ~ ! l~.-S;i i e@ tO~" II:: r-/'-" "-fI'~\.-. ~ ;, () ~ t,._~J' d ~r' II ~~"lf"iI ~,,~~ 'i L I ~ z z ~ w~ ...Jz z ii I... :2 Iii 08 < (/) i ~~~llt n : ~ ~l H ~ n: N .. " i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~l:le::' ~ :~~15 :l! ~~.~!!! ~ cLl&J~~; ~ ~~-Olo.l VI ~~~:l'Q ~ 15 ~:l!i ~ ..,15uo,",,; e :('\1,10:....3;;= m- t;;~~l:f~:5 UI __~t::....f!:~~ d ;;; /=:~:~:.~=- ..~.3:\'1 ,~\~'~:7=O~1 ,~~ I i@ R=l I a: I~ .. i~ =--.l Ii/! ~: o~~ d ~ ~2i5 ~~ ~:~ ~lI)e..c ~~~ ~'" ~\!I~ J~~~ :)o.~ ~3 ....oCjZ u~..c%ii'i ~;(~ ~~ :~;E ~oill~~ ~~(,) Q lD ~ ~l!5t;2:::E E~; ~~ g!5i :~~~~ I ~h ~~ ~~~ ~iW !5tij: <~ Q~ II) !)(c" ~~~ 815 ~gd ~~Q~~ (J~<f1 ~i ~~ l::f'=~~1oo.I e~~ ~a ;;a~ 1!=>-;l:<fIl5 ~~~ ill~ \!I~o ~~I:l!ll~ ~...UI ~8 ~~O: aG~~i z~ ~o: j!!<fI1J'i ~a!:l>-'l:l ~~~~ u/! ~15~~ ~~~~~ :II)II)~ ~~ [~~~ ~~z.~g .. . _< I- I /076 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator f)r,111/ Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director FROM: SUBJECT: Amendment to Section 10-6-21 of the City Code Concerning Design Standards for the Spruce Street Commercial, Mixed-Use, and Business/Flex Zoning Districts DATE: February 17,2004 INTRODUCTION The design standards that currently appear in the City Code for the "Spruce Street Commercial" zoning district are, in the opinion of City staff and others, less useful and less comprehensive than they need to be. Staff is therefore recommending that the existing design standards be updated, and that the revised standards be made applicable to all of the business-related zoning districts located within the "Spruce Street Corridor Area." These districts include the Spruce Street Commercial District, the Mixed-Use District, and Business/Flex Zoning District. DISCUSSION A copy of the existing design standards for the Spruce Street Commercial District has been attached as Exhibit A. These standards were incorporated into the City Code around the time that a "Spruce Street Commercial" zoning district was added to the Code, but well before any land within the City was actually rezoned to a Spruce Street Commercial designation. In short, the existing design standards were anticipatory in nature, and were not created in the context of a specific plan (by the City and/or by any landowner or developer) for actual commercial development. Since that time, the City has approved a Master Plan for the future development of the Spruce Street Corridor Area, and rezoned land within that Area into three different business-related zoning districts, two of which (Mixed-Use and Business/Commercial Flex) are entirely new. In the weeks following the adoption of the Master Plan on September 2, 2003, City staff began working on a preliminary draft of a set of revised design standards for these new [future] commercial areas. This draft was presented to and discussed by the Planning Commission at its meeting on January 13,2004, and the draft was later revised to reflect the Commissioners' comments. At a meeting that was held at City Hall on January 26, 2004, the revised draft was reviewed by landowners Bob and Stan Knutsen, Gene and Randy Pedersen of New Century (the Knutsens' developer), and other members of the Knutsen development team who were in attendance (including their builder, architect, attorney, engineer, accountant, leasing agent and attorney). The draft of the design standards was then revised again in response to comments and suggestions that were made during the aforementioned KnutsenlNew Century meeting. A public hearing on this final draft was conducted by the Planning Commission at its meeting on February 10, 2004. No public comments were made at the public hearing in opposition of the final draft. The Planning Commission suggested one final change regarding building facades, and then voted (5-0) to recommend that the City Council approve and adopt the proposed design standards (as modified by the Commission at its meeting). I have attached, as Exhibit B, the final version of the design standards that the Planning Commission recommended. City staff members will also highlight and explain a few of the more important design standards at Tuesday night's meeting, and photographs illustrating some of the design concepts will be shown. For example, attached to this Memo as Exhibit C is a photo of a portion of the Arbor Lakes commercial development in Maple Grove, which exemplifies some of the features (building facades, rooflines, sidewalks, lighting, etc.) that are addressed in the design standards that have been proposed for the Spruce Street Corridor Area. RECOMMENDED ACTION Amend Section 10-6-21 of the City Code by incorporating the proposed design standards for the Spruce Street Commercial zoning district, the Mixed-Use zoning district, and the Business/Flex zoning district. 10-6-21: SPRUCE STREET COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS: Page 1 of2 10-6-21: SPRUCE STREET COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS: (A)Site Development Standards (In Addition To Minimum Performance Standards That May Be Applicable): 1. Storage And Displays Enclosed: All storage and displays shall be enclosed within the principal building. 2. Parking Areas: Off street parking areas should be designed and located to minimize their impacts on adjacent development, street and pedestrian corridors. Parking areas shall not be located within the required minimum front (primary or secondary) yard setback of any lot. Parking lot landscaping is required per this chapter. 3. Sidewalks: Sidewalks shall be provided along both sides of all streets and access roads. 4. Internal Walkways; Bicycle Racks: Internal pedestrian walkways must be provided from perimeter sidewalks to building entrances. Benches and seating areas shall be provided along sidewalks near building entrances, corners, plazas, and other public spaces. Bicycle racks shall be provided near building entrances. 5. Yards Adjacent To Streets: All yards adjacent to street frontages shall be landscaped. 6. Screening: Screening of service yards, refuse, and waste removal areas, loading docks, truck parking areas and other areas which tend to be unsightly shall be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, dense planting, or any combination of these elements. Screening shall block views from public right of way and shall be equally effective in winter and summer. Chainlink and slatted fencing are prohibited. 7. Lighting: Exterior lighting shall enhance the building design and adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures shall be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent areas. Lighting shall be arranged and focused so that minimal light falls on adjacent property and no light shines directly at or into any adjacent building. Excessive brightness and glare shall be avoided. 8. Exemptions Of Setbacks: Buildings along CSAH 50 and Pilot Knob shall be exempt from highway building setbacks as provided for in this code. 9. Signage: A signage plan shall be required per the requirements of this chapter. (B)Architectural Standards: 1. Any building face and yard that abuts CSAH 50, Spruce Street, or Pilot Knob shall be considered a front and have a higher degree of aesthetic treatment. 2. Major exterior surfaces of all walls shall be face brick, stone, glass, stucco, architecturally treated concrete, cast in place or precast panels, decorative block, or approved equivalent, as determined by the city. The following may not be used in any visible exterior application except when specifically permitted by the city in areas with limited public view: exposed cement ("cinder") blocks; fabricated metal or pole construction structures, including sheds, warehouses, and industrial buildings constructed either on or E)(I/,a'7 ~-I http://66.113.195.234/MN/Farmingtonl13006000000021 000 .htm 2/12/2004 10-6-21: SPRUCE STREET COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS: Page 2 of2 off site of corrugated metal panels; exterior brick that is painted over; experimental materials with no proven record of durability or ease of maintenance in the intended application. 3. Windows shall be provided on walls that are adjacent to public or private rights of way, parking lots, and sidewalks. 4. Awnings/canopies shall be provided over all windows and along the frontage of all building entrances. 5. Wall faces shall be designed in a human scale to avoid the monotony of a blank facade. Techniques to promote this scale include the use color, building materials, wall coves, and architectural details. 6. Buildings shall be designed with public entrances along public and private streets and parking areas. 7. Architectural style shall not be restricted. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and on its relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions of this section. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and plant materials, colors, textures, shapes, massing, rhythms of building components and details, height, roofline and setback. 8. Mechanical equipment, satellite dishes, and other utility hardware, whether located on the roof or exterior of the building or on the ground adjacent to it, shall be screened from the public view and with materials identical to or strongly similar to building materials or by heavy landscaping that will be effective in winter or they shall be located so as not to be visible from any public way. In no case shall wooden fencing be used as a rooftop equipment screen. (Ord. 002-469, 2-19-2002; amd. Ord. 002-477, 7-15-2002) . 1-2- 2/12/2004 http://66.113.195.234/MN/Farmington/13006000000021000.htm CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 CHAPTER 6 OF THE FARMINGTON CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, CONCERNING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SPRUCE STREET COMMERCIAL, MIXED-USE AND BUSINESS/FLES ZONING DISTRICTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 10-6-21 ofthe Farmington City Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 10-6-21: DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SPRUCE STREET COMMERCIAL, MIXED-USE, AND BUSINESS/FLEX ZONING DISTRICTS (A) Site Development Standards (in addition to any Performance Standards that may be applicable). These standards apply to the Business/Flex, Mixed-Use, and Spruce Street Commercial Zoning Districts unless otherwise specified. The zoning districts are depicted on the Official Zoning Map. 1. Outdoor Storage: All materials shall be stored and/or warehoused within the principal building. 2. Off-Street Parking: Off-street parking areas shall be designed and located to minimize their impacts on adjacent development, streets and pedestrian corridors. Parking lot landscaping is required per this Chapter. 3. Sidewalks: Sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of all streets. Trails may be required instead of sidewalks as provided in the City's Trail Master Plan. (a) All pedestrian walkways shall have and maintain a minimum unobstructed pathway width of 15 feet along the north/south corridor (i.e., the first roadway constructed between CSAH 50 and Spruce Street, west of Denmark Avenue) and within the Mixed-Use area. Pedestrian walkways bordering off-street parking areas shall be at least 8 feet wide. Pedestrian and bicycle pathways connecting to greenways or trail systems are subject to standards in the City Trail Master Plan. 110424 &)q #- ;6/7 13-/ 110424 (b) Walkways shall be designed to create a safe and uninterrupted pedestrian way, and to avoid frequent crossings by driveways and streets. (c) Pedestrian walkways shall be designed as amenity areas with approved landscaping, benches, lighting, signage, and street furniture. (d) Pavers shall be required within the sidewalk design and within the crosswalk areas. Installation of the pavers shall comply with City standards. (e) Electrical and water services shall be required within the sidewalk areas to prepare for amenities including (but not limited to) water fountains, clocks, kiosks and seasonal lighting, and shall be master planned during the design phase ofthe project. 4. Screening: Screening of service yards, refuse, and waste-removal areas, loading docks, truck parking areas and other areas which tend to be unsightly shall be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, dense planting, or any combination of these elements. Screening shall block views from public rights- of-way, private street and off-street parking areas, and shall be equally effective in winter and summer. Chain link and slatted fencing are prohibited. 5. Lighting: The lighting in the Spruce Street area shall be designed to create a well-balanced, integrated lighting plan for public and private locations that enhances vehicular and pedestrian visibility while minimizing glare and contrast. Exterior lighting shall comply with Section 10-6-8 ofthe City Code. The intent for lighting is to provide needed illumination ofthe site, while at the same time preventing glare to residential uses either within or adjacent to the site. Light fixtures should be oriented to pedestrian circulation so that pedestrian walkways are emphasized and safety is enhanced. (a) At the time of Site Plan Review for the development, a detailed lighting plan shall be submitted. (b) Any lighting required on the perimeter of parking lots or along streets shall consist of fixtures illustrated in the City's Standard Detail Plate as "Street Light - Downtown District". The interior portions of parking lots may be lit with cobra lights. 6. Required Amenities: For each development, one (1) of the following amenities per 10 acres of net developable land area shall be required and installed at the time of construction ofthe project. The amenities shall be highly-visible, easily accessible outdoor focal points or gathering places for residents, employees, and visitors to the development site: t3-b1 (a) Patio and/or plaza with permanent seating areas; provided such patio or plaza has a minimum depth of 15 feet and a minimum total area of 300 square feet. (1) Pavers as required in the City standards shall be installed within the patio or plaza. (2) Patios and plazas shall include pedestrian amenities intended to support these places as gathering areas such as benches, water features, kiosks, etc. (b) Landscaped mini-park, square, or green, provided such amenity has a minimum depth and width of 15 feet and a minimum total area of 650 square feet, and includes pedestrian amenities intended to support these places as gathering areas. The landscaped mini-parks, squares or greens do not count toward the Park Dedication requirements. (c) Protected customer walkway, arcade, or easily identifiable building pass-through containing window displays and intended for general public access. (d) Water feature, such as a pond or fountain, provided the feature is easily accessed by pedestrians and includes or integrates permanent seating areas for pedestrians. (e) Any other well-designed area and/or focal feature that the City finds consistent with the intent of these design standards, and that substantially enhances such development and serves as a gathering place for residents, visitors, customers, and employees. 7. Parking of Bicycles: Bike parking spaces shall be installed at 10% of the total number of automobile spaces within the development. For convenience and security, bicycle parking facilities shall be located near building entrances, shall be placed parallel to the sidewalks, shall be easily visible and shall not be located in remote automobile parking areas. Such facilities shall not, however, be located in places that impede pedestrian or automobile traffic flow or that would cause damage to plant material. Bike racks shall provide a means for the bicycle frame and one wheel to be attached to a permanent fixture (designed for securing bicycles) by means of a lock. (B) Architectural Standards: 1. Fronts of Buildings: Any building face and yard that abuts C.S.A.H. 50, Spruce Street, or Pilot Knob shall be considered a front and shall reflect a level of aesthetic treatment equal to or greater than that of building faces and yards that abut the north-south corridor and the major roads in the Mixed-Use District. 110424 (3-'3 II 0424 2. Unifying Design Theme: Buildings and/or streetscapes in the Spruce Street Commercial District and the Business/Flex district shall reflect a unifying design theme that incorporates features found along the north/south corridor and within the Mixed-Use District. City staff and the Planning Commission shall determine whether development proposals satisfy this requirement. 3. Exterior Surfaces: Major exterior surfaces of all walls shall be face brick, stone, glass, stucco, architecturally treated concrete, cast in place or pre-cast panels, decorative block, or approved equivalent, as detennined by the City. The following may not be used in any visible exterior application except when specifically permitted by the City in areas with limited public view: exposed cement ("cinder") blocks; fabricated metal or pole construction structures, including sheds, warehouses, and industrial buildings constructed either on or off- site of corrugated metal panels; exterior brick that is painted over; or experimental materials with no proven record of durability or ease of maintenance in the intended application. 4. Facades: Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Community Development Department, developers of buildings located along the north/south corridor and within the Mixed Use District shall use fa~ade variations to differentiate separately leased commercial spaces. Fa~ade variations shall incorporate modulated and articulated building wall planes and roof lines through use of: (a) Projections, recesses, and reveals expressing structural bays or other aspects of the fa~ade, with a minimum change of plane of 6 inches. (b) Changes in color or graphical patterns, changes in texture, or changes in building material. (c) Varying parapet heights and designs that demonstrate that the buildings are different from each other and that add interest to the streetscape. (d) Recessed entrances. (e) Building entrances that incorporate elements providing shade from the sun and weather protection for pedestrians. (t) Corners which are distinguishable from the remainder of the building through the use of towers, architectural treatments, arches, roof forms, or size and mass. All buildings along the north/south corridor and within the Mixed Use District shall be constructed with at least one functional or decorative (false fa~ade) upper 6-<1 II 0424 story. To the extent practical or feasible, variations in rooflines or heights shall be used to differentiate separately-leased commercial spaces within buildings. 5. Windows: Windows shall be provided on walls that are adjacent to public or private rights-of-way, parking lots and sidewalks. False windows are allowed. 6. Projections: Buildings may have one ofthe following projecting from the building fa~ade: (a) Awnings/canopies over the first floor windows and along the frontage of all building entrances. (1) Projection: Awnings and canopies shall not project more than 5 feet into the public right-of-way, except where located above an entrance, in which case the maximum projection shall not exceed 8 feet. In no event should an awning or canopy be supported by poles or other structural elements located in the public right-of-way. (2) Length: Awnings and canopies should emphasize the rhythm of the fa~ade bays, windows and entrances, and shall not continue uninterrupted along the building fa~ade. (3) Height: The bottom of awnings and canopies should be at least 8 feet above sidewalk grade. (4) Illumination: Back-lit awnings and canopies are not permitted. (5) Inscription: Lettering on awnings and canopies shall comply with Section 10-6-3 (B)(1)(k) of the City Code. (6) Materials: Awning and canopy materials should be limited to cotton, acrylic or vinyl coated cotton, copper or bronze coated metal, or clear glass. Other materials may be used if approved by the Community Development Department. Awnings shall be designed with a slope. No horizontal awnings are allowed. Structural supports shall be constructed of steel and/or aluminum and shall (if or where visible) incorporate ornamental features. (b) Projecting signs perpendicular to the building. Projecting signs shall comply with Section 10-6-3 (B)(5)(e) of the City Code. 7. Public Entrances: For commercial buildings located along the north/south corridor, each separate ground-level tenant space shall have at least one public entrance that faces the north/south corridor. For buildings located within the Mixed Use District, each separate ground-level commercial tenant space shall have at least one public entrance that faces the nearest major public or private (3-./5 street. Developers shall be encouraged to also provide public entrances adjacent to off-street parking areas. 8. Site Plan Review: All applications shall comply with the requirements of Section 10-6-23 (E) of the Farmington City Code for Site Plan Review. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and plant materials, colors, textures, shapes, massing, rhythms of building components and details, height, roof-line and setback. 9. Screening of Roof/Exterior Equipment: Mechanical equipment, satellite dishes and other utility hardware, whether located on the roof or exterior of the building or on the ground adjacent to it, shall be screened from the public view with materials identical to or strongly similar to building materials, or by landscaping that will be effective in winter, or they shall be located so as not to be visible from any public right-of-way, private street or off-street parking area. In no case shall wooden fencing be used as a rooftop equipment screen. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED this _day of Farmington. , 2004, by the City Council of the City of CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald Ristow, Mayor ATTEST: By: City Administrator SEAL By: CITY ATTORNEY Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,2004. 110424 6-~ ~ ~~1 l ' : I, ", T '~l ~ :--:- bb -ft, -,ni, ~~, ~Q. :=:[1 t~ ~ Q "I~ l~ t~ o ~ ~ a~ I~ ~~ )( - ( '" "" 'i5:; :... ~ \9 ::'E "" , '1"" w gp c.. ~ ~ I _ { !tt~ 2'" ~ ... ~~ ~ ' ~ ~ ;5 t:J::; in< q ~ 0,.... zi= u ~ t:J -< ...z t:Jz ~ <Il <Il :3t:J 0;Ll ~ gj;:J -< -0 -'" ~ ~ ~ 0- .....i:: f=j ~ ? ;Ll ...: ~ S~ 9[2 ~ ~Lli ~ ~ :-< ~ <: ~~ =~ ~E ~ ;;: ~ ~ ~ Cl ;j;j ~.~~l/l/ ~ :Ii iiill \ ~j ~ ~-i g. !~. & .1j~ II ,j ~ l...~ ~ tl- " 7 ~ 5 l'l~ti ~ _7:. .a .0 :I: II s o en Q) S :E !:f A " ~ , ~ x 'lI ~ O':l p::; .... OJ ..., rJJ OIl ~ O':l OJ .... ~ c: ..., 8 OJ e{) OJ c: b .S C/J ~ OJU-. u~ 2 ~ 0.. .~ C/JU UJ 0 ll"l I <i V'l RJ u CD ... -( C RJ - 0- ... CD ..., ~ RJ ~ ..., CD CD en ... e ..., I- e U) 0 CD N U en ~ e 1- ... ..... (I) C. 1- >< U) w In I c:::: M ~ M I c:::: In ~ ro x :;:; ro c OJ .u OJ i:i: ro '0 :;:; Q:; .u; ro c E OJ OJ OJ .u '0 E a: u ... ro OJ .u; 0 "'-l C Cl. E OJ u z+~ .u; If) E a: ..... C OJ C C 0 ~ OJ OJ U OJ .u; 0 Cl. ....... ..... 0 '" '" c If) E '" =? OJ <Xl OJ 0 OJ .2 '0 u -t c OJ .r:: :J ~ '0 '" x .Ql ... OJ ro :J Cl. ::E: Cl. c:l ::E: J: If) 011101 ...... Q) Q) u.. o o \D ~ o ~ ...... o o M c: o "0 Q) 10 ~ u o o o M