Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.10.97 Planning Packet ..... . . 3. a) ..... b) c) . 4. a) . AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR June 10, 1997 L CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE MINUTES a) April 22, 1997 (Special) PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:00 PM - Troyhi114th Addition Preliminary and Final Plat 7: 15 PM - Development Process Ordinance Revision Dakota Mini-Storage Preliminary and Final Plat (continued) Discussion Variance for Illuminated Sign in an R-2 District - The Dental Health Center - 916 Eighth Street - Dr. Falkowski b) Rezoning of Property from B-1 to R-2 - Tamara Cook c) Revision to Fence Ordinance 5. ADJOURN I ;. . AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION Regular June 10, 1997 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE MINUTES a) April 22, 1997 (Special) 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) 7:00 PM - Troyhill4th Addition Preliminary and Final Plat . Troyhill4th Addition consists of 40 single-family lots and the overall area for the plat consists of 15.25 acres. This project is a continuation of the PUD filed in 1996. The lot sizes range from l0,454 to 20,797 square feet and lot widths starting at 80 feet. Dakota County has requested that the street name for 19l st be changed to their requirements. A letter will be sent shortly from Dakota County addressing this issue. Comments by the Engineering Department have been attached and were sent to the developer's engineer on May 30th. At this time, no response has been received from the developer's engineer. Since there are a number of engineering issues which remain to be addressed on the plat, staff is recommending that the public hearing be continued to the June 24th Planning Commission meeting to allow adequate time for the developer to address the issues. The preliminary and final plat fees have been paid. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Troyhill 4th Addition Preliminary and Final Plat be continued to the June 24th Planning Commission meeting to allow the developer to address the Engineering Department's comments. b) 7: 15 PM - Development Process Ordinance Revision The Development Process has been revised to produce a more streamlined approach to . review development plans. The attached ordinance is a summary of the flow chart presented at the April 22nd Planning Commission meeting. Revisions to the . Development Process will achieve the following goals and supporting statements: . To ensure that all planning and engineering issues are resolved before a preliminary plat is approved, it is proposed that all issues would be resolved and approved by the Planning Commission before the preliminary plat is forwarded to the City Council for approval. . Statutory provisions require only one public hearing for review of the plat. Historically, two public hearings have been held at both the Planning Commission and City Council levels. Staff, in consultation with the City Attorney, Planning Commission and in review of existing practices and past problems and concerns, suggests that only one public hearing be held at the Planning Commission level. This change in practice would still require City Council review and approval of both the preliminary and final plat, but it would appear to make more sense to ensure that all issues are fully explored, examined and finalized by the Planning Commission prior to submittal to the City Council. In addition, having only one public hearing would streamline existing planning review processes and enhance the City's customer service practices. This proposed change in the City Code has been reviewed and is recommended by the Planning Commission, the City Attorney and involved staff. . That notices for public hearings on development plats would be scheduled at the discretion of the Community Development and Engineering staff providing that the developer has submitted all necessary information and, most importantly, that staff has had adequate time to review all necessary information, normally within 21 calendar days at the Planning Commission level. Statutory provisions allow cities up to 60 days to review private development proposals once all necessary information has been provided. . That City staff will have the professional discretion to determine the suitability and appropriateness of the information requested and submitted to accurately and prudently review development plans. . Developer expectations of staff, as a short-term customer in the development planning process, has needs related to: l. timely process approvals, which includes eliminating unnecessary delays; 2. expecting that information on City Development processes is received in a timely manner from staff; 3. expecting reasonable time schedules to submit information and receive staff feedback on development proposals in a reasonable amount of time; 4. marketing an attractive and affordable housing product; and 5. minimizing unnecessary costs associated with their respective development proposal. Conversely, staffs expectations of the developer, as customer, is the following: . 1. that information requested by staff is submitted in an acceptable format for review; 2. . 3. 4. 5. 6. . . that information requested is submitted in a timely manner to allow staff adequate time to review the information and the recognition that the respective developer's proposal is one among many and will be reviewed in the order received; that as questions and/or issues emerge during the review process that the developer provide responses in a timely and appropriate manner; that the developer is responsible for preparing the plat in accordance with explained City Code provisions and acceptable manner; that the developer conduct him/herself in a courteous, professional manner that plat submittals and supporting engineering information be provided to staff by the Developer's project staff without excessive staff inquiries and telephone calls concerning the timeliness of the information requested; 7. finally, that developers be held accountable for their portion of the information requested and that their failure to do so will ultimately result in delays in the private development planning review and approval process. The major change to the development process ordinance is that only one public hearing will be required and the hearing will be held at the Planning Commission level. As stated above, the development process will be streamlined in order to insure that the developer and the City are producing and receiving quality developments. RecommeDdation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Development Process ordinance revisions in Title 11, Chapter 2, Sections l, 2 and 3 and forward the ordinance to the City Council. c) Dakota Mini-Storage Preliminary and Final Plat (continued) City staff met with Mr. Peltier and his engineer on May 29th concerning outstanding issues which needed to be resolved before the plan can continue. The issues discussed are attached and illustrate the amount of work which remains to be completed. However, if the issues can be resolved by the developer's engineer, City staff feels that the project can be successful. Staff is recommending that the project be continued to the June 24th Planning Commission meeting to allow the developer's engineer to resolve the issues. RecommeDdation Continue the public hearing to June 24th in order to allow adequate time for the developer's engineer to submit required information and a full review of this information can be executed by the Engineering Department. 4. Discussion a) Variance for Illuminated Sign in an R-2 District - The Dental Health Center - 916 Eighth Street - Dr. Falkowski . Dr. Falkowski of the Dental Health Center is seeking a variance to allow an illuminated sign in an R-2 zoning district. The Dental Health Center is located on the corner of Eighth Street and Hickory. Residential homes reside 45 feet to the north and 140 feet to the south of the sign. City Code does not allow an illuminated sign within a residential district. The sign will be located in the same location as the existing 4' x 6' wood sign which was granted a size variance on January 9, 1990. Size requirements for a sign in an R-2 district are not to exceed two square feet or exceed five feet in height. The existing wood sign for the dental office has been illuminated with flood lights on either side of the sign since 1990. However, in the minutes of January 9th, there was no mention of lighting the existing SIgn. . The proposed sign consists of two 4' x 6' panels on both sides mounted with poles. The sign will be illuminated from within with fluorescent lighting. The sign will stand 7 feet 4 inches in height. The existing sign rests on two wooden poles approximately two feet in height from the ground. The background colors to the proposed sign include light blue and green with a light gray panel in the center of the sign. Green posts will provide a foundation for the sign. b) Rezoning of Property from B-1 to R-2 - Tamara Cook The property is addressed as 10 1 7 and l02l Third Street and is located on the corner of Third Street and Ash. The property consists of two lots but has been platted as one lot. The existing zone is B-l and the owner would like to rezone the property to R-2 in order to construct townhomes on the site. The existing use for the property includes a dance studio and existing home. The site is 102' x 170' which consists of 20,400 square feet and an existing access is located along Ash Street and two accesses are located along Third Street. Dakota County has informed the developer that the access along Ash Street will be closed when the reconstruction project for Ash Street is completed. R-2 zoning surrounds this property on all sides and the Dakota County Fairgrounds is located to the south of the site. An apartment complex is located across Third Street to the west. The developer proposes to construct ten 1,376 square foot attached townhomes with two levels and a possible finished basement along with 218 square foot attached garages. The townhomes will consist of two and three bedrooms and will be rented for approximately $950/month. Two parking spaces will be provided for each townhome unit. Lot coverage on the site is slightly over 30% which would require a variance or the developer may eliminate a garage to meet the 30% lot coverage in an R-2 zone. . c) Revision to Fence Ordinance . . . The fence ordinance was revised and approved by the City Council on June 2nd. Changes to the ordinance include the allowance of a six foot wood fence on corner lots located from the front principal corner of the home and extending to the property line on either side. A triangle of visibility requirement has also been included in the ordinance which requires that the corner of the lot maintain a 30 foot visual triangle to exclude any fence over four feet in height to be located on the corner. The revised ordinance has been attached along with a illustration showing the revisions. 5. ADJOURN -- , May 30, 1997 Mr. Robert E. Payette, P.E. Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. 150 South Broadway Wayzata, MN 55391 RE: TroyHill4th Addition Dear Mr. Payette, Listed below are the conunents that Engineering has regarding the construction plans for the above referenced project. Plat 1. The curve between Everest and 191st Street does not meet design guidelines (maximum degree of curvature) for a 30 mile per hour street. 2. 191st Street W. of Everest, the curve does not meet guidelines for maximum degree of curvature. CONSTRUCTION PLANS Sheet I 1. Please include a location plan that shows the site in relationship to major roads and section lines. eit,. a.t !1a4milf,gta.If, 325 (C}ali St'leet. :Ja'lmin9ttut, AlX 5502-1 · (612) 463-711/ . :J-ax (612) 463-259/ Sheet 2 1. Show all manhole, catch basin and gate valve locations on street plan to insure that they are raised. . 2. Vertical curve at south end of Everest Path does not meet 40 mile per hour design guidelines, redesign this curve. Sheet 3 1. Show all manhole, catch basin and gate valve locations. Sheet 4 1. Show all manhole, catch basin and gate valves on the street plan. 2. Call out end curb and gutter station on 191st Street plan and profile and on Everest/19lst profile. Sheet 5 1. Show all storm sewer in plan and show all storm sewer crossings in profile. . 2. Butterfly valves no longer require manholes. Remove water manholes from plans. 3. Add valves at the connection to exi.sting watermain at the south end of Everest Trail and at the east end of 191st Street West. 4. Call out the connection to the existing pipes in plan view. 5. Label existing pipes in plan view. 6. Give a design elevation for hydrant. 7. Show the valve on the hydrant. 8. Give curb box elevation and sewer service elevation at lot services. 9. Give curb box elevation and sewer service elevation at lot services. 10. List stationing along profile sanitary profile. 11. All notes should be at 180' to bottom of page. 12. Sanitary service to lot 6, block 4 cannot be connected to the manhole. Extend the sanitary line as necessary to allow for connection to the 8" PVC line. . 13. Show lOp and bollom of watcrmain. 14. Call out watermain size on 191st Street profile. . 15. Label service note and call out materials and how far to extend tail past the property line. . 16. List size and grade of existing sanitary sewer stub. 17. The 18" watermain should be 16" to the west of the tee with the 12" according to both the 1988 and the new 1996 Water Distribution Plan for the City of Farmington. . Sheet 6 1. Show all storm sewer in plan and show any storm crossings in the profile. 2. Add valves at connection to existing lines at both ends of Everest. 3. Call out connection to existing pipes on plan view. 4. Label existing pipes in plan view. 5. Give design elevations for hydrants. 6. Show valve on hydrants. 7. Give curb box elevation and sewer service elevation at lot services. 8. List stationing along profile. 9. All notes should be at 180. to bottom of the page. 10. Sanitary services to lot 8, block 1 and lot 1, block 2 cannot connect to the sanitary manhole. Extend the sewer as required to allow for connection to the 8" PVC line. 11. Show top and bottom of watermain. 12. Label service note and call out materials and how far to extend services past the pr.operty line. 13. List grade of existin~ sanitary stub. 14. Sanitary service to lot 5, block 2 cannot connect to manhole. Connect with wye to 8" PVC. Sheets 7 alld 8 1. Add catch basins at the following locations: lots 3/4, block 4, lots 16/17, block 2, and lots 5/6, block 1. These additions will keep spacing under 500' and cut down on runby occurring at other catch basins. 2. Show all sanitary and water main on plan sheets and show all crossings in the profiles. 3. In the future submittal, include a grading plan that shows all land that will drain on to the site. This is needed to verify basin areas and to calculate time of concentration. 4. Dcsign the storm sewer system using the ratioIJalmetlzod to dctcrminc times of concentration and rainfall intensities. A standard 20 minutes, 3.6 in.!!. storm is not appropriate. The rational method must be used to determine actual times of concentration. 5. Call out class of RCP being used. . ~~ . 1. Provide a copy of grading plans to Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District for review. . Please address each of the comments and re-submit the plans and the additional information requested. If you have any questions, please contact me at 463-1601. Sincerely, ~/Z1~ Lee M. Mann, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer LMM/ll cc: file LMM . . TO: John Erar, City Administrator FROM: Lee Smick, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Dakota Mini Storage DATE: May 29, 1997 Meeting AtteDdees Mark Peltier Terry Trane John Erar Marty Kiehm Grant Jacobson Lee Smick Dave Olson Lee Mann Meeting Outcome . The following issues were discussed at the Thursday, May 29th meeting concerning Dakota Mini Storage and the developer needs to provide the following items: . Provide hydrologic and hydraulic calculations for the site to determine runoff. . Show the slope of the site at a minimum of 0.4% per current City standards. . Show proposed curbs along with cross slopes and gutters. . Show extension of parking lot pavement to the north of the site in order for future catch basins to remain outside of the gas line easement. . . Show concrete at entrance to flume to reduce erosion damage. . Show gas line elevation. Information to be included in Developer's Agreement: . Developer assumes responsibility for maintenance of proposed flumes and riprap if approved by Engineering Department. . . Developer is required to dig ditch to the pond to the north for temporary drainage. Citl} of FarminfJ.ton 325 Oak Street · FarmingtonJ MN 5502~ · (612) ~63.7171 · Fair (612) ~63.2591 . Developer is required to fill in temporary pond and hook up to infrastructure when it is installed within Phase III of the Industrial Park. . . Developer must show waterline easement along eastern property line and for the future location of storm sewer so City may secure easements and this information should be provided in Developer's Agreement. Proposed assessments for project include the following: . Trunk main costs will be calculated at this time and will be invoiced upon approval of final site plan. . Street improvements, storm sewer, work already completed on pond to north and any future work to be completed, etc. will be assessed at a later date when this infrastructure is installed. . No credit will be given to the developer for constructing the temporary ditch of for taking water from the PIC site to the north pond. Information City needs to provide: . Research future assessment costs for the site and determine if developer pays a one time fee for those assessments. . . Engineering Department will provide the developer with standards and specifications for flumes. . Planning Division will discuss 20lth road easement with Dave Grannis, City Attorney to determine if easement is required to be shown on the plat. cc: Mark Peltier Grant Jacobson Dave Olson Lee Mann File . . . ..i . MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR DECEMBER 12, 1989 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Hanson. Members Present: Dau, Hanson, Rotty, Schlawin. Members Absent: Strelow Also Present: Planner Tooker. 2. Chairman Hanson asked William Uhlir about his understanding of the sign pro- blem at his residence on Highway 50. Mr. Uhlir indicated that he sharpened saws as a retirement project, but that the revenues generated did not justify paying for a public hearing. It was explained to him that all home occupations require a conditional use public hearing. The Commission members said that such a hearing likely would prove to be favorable regarding the home occupation but they said that the sign he has is too large and likely would be limited to a 1'x 2' name- plate. Mr. Uhlir said he would remove the existing sign and think bout asking for a home occupation in the future. 3. Chairman Hanson then recognized LaDonna Riste who would like to add two efficiency apartments on the second floor of the business building she owns with her husband on Oak Street. Planner Tooker indicated that the request could not be handled through the current ordinance since apartment densities in the downtown are limited to 20 units per acre. On the other hand, housing for elderly and handicapped could be built at 60 units per acre. In essence, market rate housing, such as the units proposed by Ms. Riste, could only include 1.7 units on this lot, whereas r subsidized housing could include 5 units. The Chairman suggested that the staff review the ordinance with an eye toward eliminating this discrepancy and to ask for comments from the HRA. 4. Member Strelow arrived at 7:30 P.M. )l.([) Chairman Hanson next moved to Dr. Falkowski, who has a sign problem (too large) at his office on Highway 2' Dr. Falkowski suggested that since his office is lo- cated on a frontage road across from the shopping center and down the street from a used car lot, it is more like a business district than a residential district and the sign is a valuable part of the service he provides. The sign is 4x6 rather than 3x4 and he would like to seek a variance in order to retain the existing sign. Members of the Commission indicated their support for such a variance and encouraged him to apply for the variance. 6. Planner Tooker said that Paster Enterprises has found a prospective tenant who would move to the Farmington Mallon Highway 3 if the Zoning Ordinance were to be amended. Currently day care is listed as a conditional use in the R-3 High Density district but not in the B-1 Limited Business District. Most large franchise day care facilities are found in business districts because of the traffic and most are situated in buildings designed for that purpose. Farmington Mall is somewhat different in that it is an existing strip center. However, by listing Day Care in the conditional use column, the Planning Commission will be able to assure a proper relationship between the interior space and open play areas. Good land use rela- tionships would not include a division of areas requiring clients to mix with other pedestrians in walking from indoor to outdoor areas of the day care facility. .. ...1 ~ ~.J .) MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR JANUARY 9, 1990 . 1. Chairman Hanson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Hanson, Rotty, Schlawin, Strelow. Members Absent: Dau. Also Present: Planner Tooker. 2. Chairman Hanson asked for comments on the minutes of December 12, 1989. MOTION by Strelow, second by Schlawin to approve the minutes of December 12, 1989 as distributed. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. ~ The Chairman opened the Public Hearing scheduled for 7:00 P.M. regarding a sign size variance requested by Jon S. Falkowski for his office located on the west frontage road for Highway 3 with an address at 916 8th Street. The office had been granted a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission approximately seven years earlier, but no mention was made of a sign. Dr. Falkowski has indicated that the sign was installed to replace one used earlier when this structure was occupied by a church. No one requested to be recognized regarding this issue. MOTION by Schlawin, second by Hanson to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Rotty, second by Strelow to approve a variance for Dr. Falkowski which will allow him to keep the 4x6 sign in front of his dental office because the use was approved much earlier without any discussion of a sign, the office faces a State highway with business activity across the highway and the sign uses the same base as was utilized by the church that formerly occupied this lot. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.-- . 4. The Chairman asked Planner Tooker to discuss an informal request from Dave Vanderlinde at 409 Elm Street to rezone his property from R-3 to B-2 in order for him to conduct a bait and tackle business along Highway 50. Planner Tooker suggested that such a change would be disruptive to the neighborhood since there are no other businesses on the north side of the street in this block. The building was formerly occupied by a shoe repair shop attached to a single family dwelling. However, it was a nonconforming use which had to become conforming once it remained vacant for a year. Mr. Vanderlinde was present at the discussion and Chairman Hanson briefly reviewed the concept of spot zoning and home occupations. Member Schlawin said that he did not favor creating a spot zone for such a business and Member Strelow also added that there is too much vacant business space within the B-2 District right now to warrant an expansion. Chairman Hanson explained that Mr. Vanderlinde could make items for sale in his home, but would need to sell them on consignment or wholesale them to retailers in the business district. Mr. Vanderlinde thanked the Commission for its consideration. 5. Planner Tooker presented the concept of increasing the housing unit density for market rate housing within the B-2 District which was suggested by a request from LaDonna Riste to add two apartments to the upper level of a building she owns together with her husband on Oak Street. He read a memo from HRA Director Henricks stating that the HRA Board does not approve of such a density increase for existing constructior. The memo suggests that senior housing facilities take less space than other types of housing and that adding housing units to existing buildings might jeopardize efforts to revitalize the downtown. Planner Tooker said that zoning does not distinguish between new and existing construction and an increase in the number of units downt~ would be helpful in attracting new business ventures into the downtown. In reality, there are few structures within the downtown area that would benefit from the proposed . f,! "- ~- ~- \~' ~e f ,II ,~ \',- '~ l ~ f- ifi ~ IV " ~~ ~ ih 7- ~- ~~, I- n >'1 ~ "- v (j - .. t ~ U- ~ >S l>- } ~ "7 1: l:. 1" tl ~ \ e~l l W 1 II. ~~ ii " ,~ ;r, ~ -z. ,,~-,-\.~ 1 ~ ," Jr ~, /'Ij f. .J- \. '-'~' :'~, l' ~- ~ x :> / )- , I ~/ --, I ~ " A' ( :... '< '<;' '\( +- -,'-" " -r '" ''''" : /' \\ ~: j, , -----\ 1. \ \ . l,{--;'~~\."Q~l~. )\\ \ '- \ ;.,':~' ~~ \ t;:=\\-------- \ \ : l~~, <@\ ~,~ \\ I '''':l :>'.JL3-, \ ?, II ~! \ i~J '\~~~<'l ~/\, 0:.: \ I \. II C" ; ""\" {,,I i ij:r ~I, @ ~(J "i , "~\I 1 ,."J h. _~ ~~ I" ~ i ~ , i ~ ! :L I '\ ''':1 \,( \,(!) b !.:. ~ @., ~ g,; ~\ ~l n". ! ~l ~i I I ~ "') I ~! (CYJ I ~! ~I 11i = , ijj lVb t~ ~ 1,:J , I 6'"J. i I ~l l ~ [}= ro I==:=l F ~ [illJj g ~ d ~ ~ [!J1 .. :3 . ~..~ ,~ "- )- .-' ... ,~ ~ \~ @ 'm .,~~~ ~Yl ,~"'~ -= '- ,. 't4 ) ~"\C , :.... :..-.._.:=, ~~ Fl. c,o '1.;,.1'" , L ~,iDj f--:-'l1r~,e~..~ \ ~ '~ ,., i~ (., ,_____1 "ee','t~-'i ',<v');.,____, ' "",? \ i i -- '.,." ~ '(f, :{ ! "G_ <~ _ \ __ .._ I '- ',. '"" '~; )l;, ... ... '~ ~, cl' ,.< , ,~ I .... ,,- " 4: y ~ \ .. ~ " H~ ~- *' ~, <- <;- '\ ... .. ...~ ,:. '- ~ ." lev ~ '-, \!.' ., f.... " ~ l -e , , .J ---1. _A_ .. -- ~ ./ ~~t ; '" ,- "" .... . ; . TOWNHOUSE RENTAL DEVELOPMENT 6/3/97 . . 1 0 TOWNHOME RENTAL DEVELOPMENT BIF DEVELOPMENT, INC FARMINGTON MINNESOTA 1997 2 0 Introduction . PROPOSED RENTAL TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT. LOCATED ON THE CORNER OF 3RD & ASH. . BY TAMARA L. COOK & GREG ANDERSON 3 0 Topics of Discussion . BACKGROUNDIBIOGRAPHlES . BIF DEVELOPMENT, INC. PROPOSED PROJECT . ZONING . VARIANCE . SUMMARY 4 0 Topic One . BIF DEVELOPMENT, INe. IS WHOLLY OWNED BY TAMARA COOK, A LONG TIME MINNESOTA RESIDENT AND FARMINGTON BUSINESS PERSON. SHE HAS DEVELOPED NUMEROUS REAL ESTATE PROJECTS. . GREG ANDERSON, CONSULTANT TO "BlF" HAS 27 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT . AGRI BUILDINGS, SINGLE & MUL TI-F AMlL Y HOMES AS WELL AS COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION . THE ABOVE EXPERIENCE INSURES QUALITY DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 5 0 Topic two . "BlF" PROPOSES TO BUILD to TOWNHOMES LOCATED ON THE CORNER OF 3RD & ASH. THE TOWN HOMES WILL HAVE A IT ACHED GARAGES AND ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES. THE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE STANDARD STICK BUILT WITH CONVENTIONAL MATERIALS AND BUILT TO LOCAL SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES. . PROPERTY LAYOUT & TOWNHOME SKETCH . "BlF" WILL USE LOCAL SUBCONTRACTORS. 6 ~ Topic Three . ZONING. THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE THAT THE CURRENT ZONING WILL BE CHANGED. . CURRENT ZONING IS Bl, COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL . ZONING NEEDS TO BE R2. 7 0 Topic Four . B/F DEVELOPMENT, /NC PH. (6/2) 652-2463/ TOWNHOUSE RENTAL DEVELOPMENT 6/3/97 . THIS PROPERTY WILL BE DEVELOPED WITHIN ALL CURRENT CITY SET-BACK CODES, BUT WILL REQUIRE A MINOR V ARlANCE TO THE 30% ALLOWED SQUARE FOOT BUILDING CODE. 8 c:J What This Means . TEN NEW FAMILIES LIVING IN THE FARMINGTON DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY, SUPPORTING LOCAL BUSINESS. . INCREASED PROPERTY TAX REVENUE . JOBS CREATED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE AND FUTURE MAINTENANCE . IMPROVED VISUAL IMPACT ON A MNOR ARTERIAL INTERSECTION IN THE CITY FARMINGTON 9 Ll Next Steps . "BlF" DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES THAT THE CITY OF FARMINGTONS' PLANNING COMMISSION SUPPORT THE NEW PROPOSED TOWNHOME COMMUNITY. . APPROVAL TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO R2 . APPROVAL OF ANY APPLICABLE VARIANCE . - . BIF DEVELOPMENT, INC PH. (6/2) 652-24632 TOWNHOUSE RENTAL DEVELOPMENT . . . TOWNHOME RENTAL DEVELOPMENT BIF DEVELOPMENT, INC. FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA 1997 Introduction _+.',;" . PROPOSED RENTAL TOWNHOME 5" .... DEVELOPMENf. LOCATEDONTIIE = CORNER OF 3RD & ASH. : .BYTAMARALCOOK & : <i' GREG ANDERSON Topics of Discussion '. .";;? . BACKGROUNDIBIOGRAPHIES . ,'. = . BIF DEVELOPMENT, INC. PROPOSED = PROJECT . : . ZONING :.'...~., . VARIANCE .., . SUMMARY BIF DEVELOPMENT, INC 6/5/97 PH. (612) 652-24631 TOWNHOUSE RENTAL DEVELOPMENT Topic One 'f DIP DEVELOPMENT,lNe IS WHOLLY OWNED BY TAMARA .",;..:;'!<lOOK, A LONGTIME MINNESOTA RESIDENT AND . . .... FARMINGTON BUSINESS PERSON. SHE HAS DEVELOPED : NUMEROUS REAL EsrATE PROmers. . . GREGANDERSON,CONSULTANTTO"BIF"HAS27YEARS : EXPERIENCE IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL EsrATE . '.. .. DEVELOPMENT .. "'; _.:AGRI BUILDINGS, SINGLE "'MULTI-FAMILY HOMES AS LL ItS COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION THE ABOVE EXPERIENCE INSURES QUALITY DESIGN '" CONSfRUcnON I topic lwo :.~'iS~'. "BIF'PROPOSES TOBun.D 10 TOWNHOMES :..... LOCATEDONTIlECORNEROF3RD&:ASH. TIlE : TOWNHOMES WnL HAVE ATTACHED GARAGES . AND ADDmONAL PARKING SPACES. TIlE : CONSTRUCl10N WnL BE STANDARD STICK . ..... BUILTwmICONVENTIONALMATERIALSAND =:' '''i;1l BUlLT TO LOCAL SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES. . PROPERTY LA your &: TOWNHOME SKETCH . "BIF' W1LL USE LOCAL SUBCONTRACTORS. Topic Three .' . . ." . . . . I . CURRENT ZONING IS BI, : ':.' ", COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL I_ ZONING NEEDS TO BE Rl. . ZONING. TIllS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE THAT THE CURRENT ZONING WILL BE CHANGED. BIF DEVELOPMENT. INC 6/5/97 . . . PH. (612) 652-24632 . ~.. .;' ~. < ,.".' ~~;% "-.-....---.:";',' .- l1J~" EJ" ..:. .r~ '" ..' .11 ~ l.~ ':', , .:~ m l4J P:.dA . ~<ld' ci- ~ Uh. t> \ /. <-I. IP .f Ltp/WI J4.J Uu..~...~ c _e .l[c:J.l .1~:-"b ka.V... .j,.~ J ...h.t Col. .!. .b ~ Of-'A.."t- ,f' ~}~:T;: ~_!': ,......e. J :.~..;.:. L:..:.'. ~.. '" t C~. 2J p rl f)lIUU".:l ~. ~ lS~~J . ~ -a . llU~'1 .., "_\ , ,,'f CI. . .1 Cr,,(I(6 (I,L. , . '." NI' DY~/C)PI}f~f}t . . . TOWNHOUSE RENTAL DEVELOPMENT Topic Four .~><;~ . TInS PROPERTY WILL BE 5' de DEVELOPED WITIllN ALL CURRENT : CITY SET-BACK CODES, BUT : HOWEVER WILL REQUIRE A MINOR : . V ARlANCE TO THE 30% ALLOWED : ':./' SQUARE FOOT BUILDING CODE. . What This Means :. :'>':;. . TEN NEW FAMILIES LIVING IN THE : . FARMINGTON DOWNTOWN COMMUNIlY, : SUPPORTING LOCAL BUSINESS. : . INCREASED PROPERTY TAX REVENUE : . . JOBS CREATED DURING THE ="0,:(1, CONSTRUCTION PHASE AND FUTIJRE .. ... MAINTENANCE . IMPROVED VISUAL IMPACT ON A MAJOR ARTERIAL INTERSECTION IN THE CITY FARMINGTON Next Steps .~ . '. . . . . . . . : COMMUNITY. .' . .'.;;,iii.iS . APPROVAL TO REZONE THE I.;~. PROPERTYTOR2 . APPROVAL OF ANY APPLICABLE VARIANCE . "BIF' DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES THAT THE CITY OF FARMlNGTONS' PLANNING COMMISSION SUPPORT THE NEW PROPOSED TOWNHOME BIF DEVELOPMENT, INe 6/5/97 PH. (612) 652-24633 'l'02 I .-- dO' ----, fJ~)(. f~k. 1fb P.<k. Ifl, I - - - -;- - . - - - -. -. -~ fJ;ek.. -#7 #7 'It 1 P~,.t. #'g #-'[ trl - 8 ..... ... >:::., --l to-. I ..... #.;< #9 ~.2 .. #3 l IT3 #: 10 ... <::) ~. ~ V) PM. J ., --------- ~J .~ P,O. "# 10 #7' #~ ~ "6 .7.~' #? "u #5 P.e.K. , -- -------- PI-*. PilI<. ------- - - - - _ e_ ------- - 90' i3I /" D::w:./~,tJfJle.nt " 't ~ . . . PRO P 0 SED CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE Amending Title 10, Chapter 6, Section 15 - Fences THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Title 10, Chapter 6, Section 15 - Fences - shall be amended by adding (underlined) and deleting (C:ltruc]c) as follows: 10-6-15: Fences: Fences shall be permitted in all yards subject to the following: A. In residential districts four foot (4') fences may be located on any lot line except that fences on interior lots may be six feet (6') in height on the side and rear lot lines beginning at the nearest front corner of the principal building. B. Corner Lots: Fences up to six feet (6') in height may be constructed on the side and rear lot lines behind the nearest front corner of the principal building subject to the following: 1. The front corner of the principal building is defined as beginning at the widest point of the structure's front street facing foundation as determined by its street address. 2. No fence over four feet (4') in height shall be located within the triangle of visibility which is that area within a triangle created by measuring from a point on the curb or edge of the street closest to the center of the intersection. down the front curb lines or edge of the intersecting streets thirty feet (30'). and then connecting these end points with a straight line. C. Should the fence be located between principal buildings with varying setbacks on adjacent lots, a fence up to six feet (6') in height may not extend beyond the average setback of the two (2) buildings. D. A variance is re~ired for fences over six feet (6') and u~ to eight feet (8') in height when constructed within the buildable areas of lots in residential districts. E. Fences located within commercial and industrial districts may be located on any lot line up to a height of eight feet (8') except in the required front yard. ~ . , F. A site plan or leqal survey with the location of the proposed fence shall be . submitted to the Building Inspection Division for approval for all fences over four feet {4'} in heiqht. An qpplication for a building permit is required for all fences exceeding six feet {6'} in height. G. Fences in all districts. except agricultural. shall be constructed of materials widely accepted in the fencing industry. No plywood boards. canvas. plastic sheeting. metal sheeting or similar material shall be used for any fence construction. H. All fences shall be maintained in good condition and vertical position. and any missing or deteriorated wood slats. pickets. other fencing material. or structural elements shall be replaced in a timely manner with the same quality of material and workmanship. SECTXON XX: After adoption, signing and attestation, this ordinance shall be published one time in the official publication of the City and shall be in effect on and after the day following such publication. Enacted and ordained the 2nd day of June 1997. SEAL City of Farmington . Attest: Mayor City Administrator Approved as to form the day of June, 1997. City Attorney Published in the Farmington Independent the day of June, 1997. .