HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
JANUARY 10, 1995
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chair Schlawin.
Members Present: Gramentz, Harmelink, Schlawin, Strachan, Thelen.
Members Absent: None.
Also Present: City planner Tooker, City Administrator Thompson.
2. Chair Schlawin asked for comments on the minutes of December 13, 1994.
Member Strachan said that in item 5, a quote attributed to him should be
changed to reflect that site development ~ rather than (will) help the
problem of vandalism. MOTION by Thelen, second by Harmelink to approve the
minutes of December 13, 1995 as amended. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
3. City Planner Tooker presented the status of the Vermillion River Housing
plat plus the PUD of Rosebrier Apartments and petitioned Zoning Ordinance
amendment following reopening of the continued hearing by Chair Schlawin.
Identified needs of the proposed project include, as follows:
a. An amendment to the wetland setback requirements of the wetland ordinance
which would reduce the existing requirements from 100 feet to
approximately 20 feet.
c
b. Basement elevations which, if approved below the 100 year event, would
need to be floodproofed to the satisfaction of the Federal Emergency
Management Administration FEMA or lifted one foot above the regional
flood.
c. NURP ponding of a capacity to accommodate a 100 year rainfall event. The
pond in the southeast corner of this site has been designed for this but
in case the capacity is short, the central court grass panel could be
redesigned to provide a first stage settling pond.
d. The primary access road has been designed to keep from flooding, but
access to the shopping center needs to be made more difficult to keep it
from becoming a short cut to Elm Street.
e. An easement will be required over the NURP pond and both the wetland and
floodplain areas on the site must be dedicated to the City.
f. The area of disagreement between the previous landowner and the City
about 15 feet of land on the w~st side of the site will be settled by the
developer dedicating this land area to the City.
g. A landscape plan needs to be developed and approved by the Staff and
engineering detail completed as specified by the City Engineer.
[]
The discussion was reasonably brief by Commission members. The developer was
asked about the PCA involvement and he suggested that they believe that a
soils clean up grant may be possible to attain. He also spoke about tax
credits available from the State that will help finance the housing. Ninety-
six units are proposed in the form of 90 apartments in 2 buildings and 6
townhouse units. It was decided that a series of motions were necessary to
respond to the various questions that had been raised by the proposal. (~
MOTION by Strachan, second by Thelen to close the public hearings on zoning
and platting. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Strachan, second by Gramentz
to recommend rezoning the area north of City Center, west of the railroad and
south of the Vermillion River from B-3 to R-3 to the City Council. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Gramentz, second by Harmelink to forward to the
City Council a recommendation for reduction of the building setback line in
areas adjoining wetlands from 100 feet to a range between 16.5 feet and 25
feet, including an overall average of 20 feet. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION
by Strachan, second by Thelen to recommend approval of the Rosebrier
Apartment PUD to the City Council subject to satisfaction of concerns
identified above in items a through g. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Member Strachan was excused at 7:45 P.M..
MOTION by Gramentz, second by Harmelink to forward the preliminary plat of
Vermillion River Housing to the City Council with a recommendation for its
approval. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
4. City Planner Tooker introduced the continued discussion of the maximum
size that would be acceptable for accessory buildings as presented in a draft
amendment prepared by Member Harmelink. There was general discussion of a
revised draft presented by Member Harmelink. MOTION by Gramentz, second by
Harmelink to forward .the revised draft of the proposed amendment to the City
Council with a recommendation for its approval. VOTING FOR: Gramentz,
Har.melink. OPPOSED: Schlawin, Thelen. MOTION FAILED. Due to the time
lapse between the Council referring the ordinance to the Commission and now,
the members present agreed to forward the issue to the City Council without
recommendation.
C)
S. City Planner Tooker outlined the changes in the sign ordinance that
became necessary because of the current limits in the maximum size of area
.devoted to signs in multiple tenant buildings. MOTION by Gramentz, second by
Harmelink to forward the draft ordinance to the City Council with the
recommendation that it should be approved. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
6. City Planner Tooker presented a request from Kwik Trip, Inc. to extend
the conditional use approval for an automobile service station at the
northwest corner of the intersection of Third and Elm Streets for one year
provided that Kwik Trip produces a construction schedule for the proposed
station that will be completed in 1995. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
7. There being no additional business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at
8 :30 P.M..
Submitted by,
Charles Tooker
City Planner
Approved
u
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
FEBRUARY 14, 1995
1. Chair Schlawin called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M..
Members Present: Gramentz, Schlawin, Strachan, Thelen.
Members Absent: Harmelink (arrived at 7:05 P.M.)
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. Chair Schlawin asked for comments on the minutes January 10th. MOTION by
Thelen, second by Gramentz to approve the minutes of January 10, 1995 as
distributed. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
o
3. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing advertised for 7:00 P.M. as
requested by Susan Poi rot to rezone the lot immediately north of Budget Mart on
the east side of Highway 3 approximately 700 feet north of Maple Street from
R-3 to B-1 to accommodate an animal clinic. The request conforms with the
Draft Comprehensive Plan of 1990 which indicated an expansion of Budget Mart.
This is a different request in that there will be two different uses at this
development node. However, it would be the objective of the staff to provide
enough input on site planning to minimize traffic confusion and facilitate
landscaping. (Member Harmelink arrived.) There were a series of questions
from the Commission members regarding adjoining land use, hours of operation
and the design of the proposed building. Ms. Poirot indicated that she has
done little to narrow down the architectural options, however, she does believe
that the long side of the proposed building should be perpendicular rather than
parallel with Trunk Highway 3. MOTION by Gramentz, second by Thelen to close
the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Strachan, second by
Harmelink to recommend to the City Council the approval of the rezoning of the
vacant parcel immediately north of Budget Mart from R-3 to B-1. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
o
4. The Chair opened the public hearing advertised for 7:15 P.M. as requested
by the First National Bank for a variance to the parking requirements of the
zoning ordinance. As the ordinance is currently written, the existing building
and the proposed addition would need 25 off street parking spaces if it were
located in any business district but the downtown. The downtown was exempted
from parking requirements in anticipation of public parking facilities. The
bank, in providing 19 spaces, is very close to the number that would be
required elsewhere. The City staff has suggested a reorientation of two spaces
on the west side of the lot to allow better maneuverability in a relatively
tight area of the site and to eliminate 9' feet from a curbing designed to
protect the drive up teller lanes but which contributes to an unnecessarily
restricted access to the west end of the parking lot. Members were interested
in knowing if the bank could accommodate the requested changes, including
improved landscaping, in the site plan. City Planner Tooker indicated that
these items have not been discussed but that he would negotiate the issue if
the Commission agreed in general with the objectives outlined. MOTION by
Harmelink, second by Thelen to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION by Strachan, second by Harmelink to approve, in concept, the
improvements to the bank and for the City Planner to work with the applicant on
improved landscaping and a modified parking layout. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Planning Minutes - 2/14/95 - Page 2
5. City Planner Tooker described a request from Minnesota Pipe and Equipment,
a Lakeville company which has purchased land in the Farmington Industrial Park,
to bring an office trailer on site to be used by the company while their
permanent building is being constructed. Currently the ordinance refers to
construction trailers but is silent about the use of trailers as temporary
office buildings. Commission members agreed that such a facility would not
cause any problem for the City as long as it will be removed once the new
structure is complete. MOTION by Harmelink, second by Thelen to allow
Minnesota Pipe and Equipment the use of a temporary trailer office building for
a six month period of time. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
6. The Chair then asked for a discussion on an amendment to the final plat of
Dakota County Estates 9th Addition. City Planner Tooker said that the only
change in the plat will be the division of Lot l, Block 2 into three lots.
This is being accomplished by adding two lot lines to the plat. The reason for
the request is that the lenders require all of the townhouse units to be
presold before financing is available. The sales have been moving quickly, but
a smaller number of units at a time will be more manageable. MOTION by
Gramentz, second by Harmelink to forward a recommendation to the City Council
to adopt a resolution approving an amendment to the Dakota County Estates 9th
Addition plat which will add two lot lines to divide the large townhouse lot in
Block 2. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
7. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing requested by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority for a variance to the sign ordinance to allow a
combination business, directional and public information sign on the south side .C..~.,).
of Elm Street of 72 square feet. The sign ordinance limits business signs to_
50 square feet on Elm Street since the maximum speed of traffic is 30 miles per
hour. The reason for the variance is that several purposes will be served by
the sign and that it will welcome people and direct them into the downtown.
There was general agreement among members of the Commission that such a sign
would be a good idea. MOTION by Thelen, second by Harmelink to close the
public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Harmel ink, second by Thelen
to approve the requested variance for a 72 square foot free standing sign on
HRA property which will advertise up to 4 businesses at a time plus identify
the downtown and provide public service information as well, subject to the
development and implementation of a landscape plan at this site. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
8. The City Planner reviewed the final PUD plan for Nelsen Hills Farm
Addition. The main question involved the future improvement of 190th Street
which is identified in the PUD as a half street and not at all where it is only
partially improved on the south side of Phase I of Nelsen Hills Farm. City
Planner Tooker said that the southern portion, at least the area adjoining
190th Street, could not be platted until TroyHill, the plat south of 190th
Street, is also platted. There has also been some discussion by the staff of
designating 190th Street a Municipal State Aid route which would allow its
construction all of the way from Nelsen Hills Farm Phase I to Flagstaff Avenue.
The citizens present for this discussion were limited to Emily and Russ Rahn
who requested more effort by the City staff toward informing nearby property
owners about the consequences of plat improvements. Both Mr.and Mrs. Rahn
believe that the grading that was done on Nelsen Hills Farm 3rd Addition has
lJ
o
o
o
Planning Minutes - 2/14/95 - Page 3
significantly devalued their property. They also believe that the adjoining
ponding area, which they understood would be dry, but actually will be wet,
will also have a deleterious effect on their property. Chair Schlawin asked if
there is anything that can be done at this point to change the on site grading
that affects the Rahn property. City Planner Tooker responded that the grading
done on site was accomplished by following an approved plan and changes at this
time likely would negatively affect the plat as it is now developed. The
issues related to the plat are separate and more detailed than the issues
involved with the PUD. MOTION by Strachan, second by Gramentz to recommend
approval of the Nelsen Hills Farm PUD to the City Council subject to an
understanding with the developer that the unbuilt portion of 190th Street in
Phase I must be built as part of the phase adjoining the unimproved length of
190th Street by the Developer and that this will not happen until TroyHill area
on the south side of 190th Street is also built. ~ MOTION CARRIED.~
9. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing advertised for 7:45 P.M. requested
by Hansen Flavors to operate a wholesale/retail business at the Farmington
Mall. City Planner Tooker said that Mr. Hansen did not supply an abstractor's
list of property owners within 350 feet of the property and, therefore, the
Commission could not take any action on the request. If the list is submitted
this week, people could be notified for a continuation of this hearing during
the regular meeting in March of 1995. In general, members present were in
favor of granting a conditional use for this wholesale business but wanted to
make sure that nearby property owners had an opportunity to comment. MOTION by
Thelen, second by Strachan to continue the public hearing for Hansen Flavors to
March 14, 1995 at 7:00 P.M.. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
10. Chair Schlawin opened a discussion of Planning Commission organization for
this year. In essence, the organization is limited to an election of Chair and
Vice Chair. Member Gramentz spoke about the potential for rotating the
responsibility of officers. He then nominated Cheryl Thelen for Chair. There
was not a second. Member Strachan indicated that he felt positively about the
rotation of responsibility, but possibly not doing it every year. Member
Strachan then nominated Craig Schlawin to serve as Chair for 1995. Member
Harmelink provided a second. Those in favor: Gramentz, Harmelink, Strachan,
Thelen. Abstain: Schlawin. Member Strachan then nominated Cheryl Thelen as
Vice Chair for 1995. Member Harmelink provided a second. Those in favor:
Gramentz, Harmelink, Schlawin, Strachan. Abstain: Thelen.
11. There being,no further business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at
8:30 P.M..
Submitted by,
{l/Jl, 17 ~~
Charles Tooker
City Planner
~w1-eV" Sc..h IC\ w i V\
0\,\0 ~\'V\ed %0 i'V' ucAe..
~A O~\r l'V'e~r5 uokd
-k> D.f pro II e... .
Approved -;.
.3ft/lib
o
o
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
MARCH 14, 1995
1. Chair Schlawin called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M..
Members Present: Gramentz, Harmel ink, Schlawin, Strachan, Thelen.
Members Absent: None.
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. The Chair said that the minutes of February 14, 1995 required an amendment
in discussion item 8. Chair Schlawin should be listed as abstaining from the
vote on Nelsen Hills Farm PUD. MOTION by Thelen, second by Strachan to approve
the minutes of February 14, 1995 subject to changing the recorded vote on
discussion item 8. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
3. Chair Schlawin reopened the public hearing requested by Hanson Flavors for
a conditional use to operate a wholesale packaging and distributing business
involving spices. Steve Hanson was present to describe the equipment utilized
in the business. The two items mentioned were a moderately sized mixing
machine and a small bottling machine for plastic containers. Kathy Wills,
820 9th street, asked about dewatering of basements because of the surface
water problem at the Center, but she also waS interested in potential odors
that might be associated with cooking to create the spice mixes. The water
problem was considered to be a concern of Paster Enterprises and not the
tenants of the building. Mr. Hanson said that there will be no cooking done on
the premises. Member Gramentz asked about hours of operation, trucking and the
number of employees. The response from Mr. Hanson suggested that regular daily
hours would be kept, all materials come to and leave from the building by
station wagon or van. There will be only two employees of this business,
namely Mr. Hanson and his wife. MOTION by Harmelink, second by Thelen to close
the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Harmelink, second by
Gramentz to approve the conditional use based upon information supplied by the
applicant, Dick Hanson and his son, steve Hanson. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
4. City Planner Tooker presented a pre-schematic sketch plan of Deer Meadow, a
3S acre residential PUD located on the west side of County Road 31 at the
Lakeville city boundary. The PUD has one major drawback which is access from
County Road 31 only. Hill Dee subdivision was developed in Lakeville Township
prior to its annexation to Farmington. Hill View was approved after annexation
to Farmington and an outlot was set aside for street purposes in anticipation
of future development to the south. The City Council, at that time, purchased
a triangle of land from a property owner in Hill Dee Subdivision which
separated the outlot from Upper 182nd street West. In 1986, when Terra Second
Addition was platted, the developer improved Euclid Street to link with
Upper 182nd street West. Essentially the same situation exists on the north
side of Hill Dee except that, in order to provide internal traffic circulation
for the neighborhood, this time a house and lot will need to be purchased by
the City. Three alternatives present themselves. The most desirable from the
point of view of the City would be Lot 15, Block 1, Hill Dee 2nd Addition.
This would eliminate a cuI de sac, the entire lot would not be used for a
street (either the existing house could be moved or a new one built), and
access to the park from the new housing would be ideal. The second alternative
would be to extend the "eye brow" at the north end of Facade Avenue through Lot
27, Block 1 into Deer Meadow. The primary disadvantage of this solution is
that the lot does not line up directly with the north/south street. The third
alternative would remove Lot 5, Block 1, Hill Dee First Addition. This
proposal would allow a direct extension of Euclid Avenue north to 180th street
and also provide convenient access to the park.
It was explained that a PUD has been proposed because the developer is
concerned about the market for higher priced homes on the lower level areas of
the site. Home sites of 10,000 square feet are proposed on the border of Hill
Dee which was platted with 15,000 square foot lots. Sites of 8400 square feet
with 70 feet of frontage have been proposed in the low area. Parks and
Recreation Director Bell has indicated that he is not interested in creating
another small park in this neighborhood. However, City Engineer Kaldunski has
suggested a preference for a two phase nurping system on site.
Members of the Commission responded positively to the concept of a blended
subdivision with respect to lot size. A minimum area of 8400 square feet with
a 70 foot lot width were considered to be acceptable. Regarding the access
problem, the members were apprehensive about opening a cuI de sac to through
traffic, even if the traffic flow would be substantially better. They did
agree upon the extension of Euclid Avenue as a way to provide a second access
into Deer Meadow. Tim Giles, the owner/developer of the property, was asked
about his response to suggestions from the staff. He reacted favorably,
particularly if the Commission would approve of 8400 square foot lots on land
which does not abut the Hill Dee plat. He said that he would like to proceed
quickly and suggested that he would be returning to the next meeting with a
schematic PUD. He also said that he would plan to erect a 6 foot fence along
the south and west sides of the five acre exception to the PUD.
5. The Planning Commission was asked to review products that will be sold by c-)
God's Country Nursery on County Road 50. The product list includes: trees, .._:~,'
shrubs, flowers and perennials, potting soil and mulches, weed mat, fertilizer,
vegetable plants, grass seed, cedar flower planters and bird houses, plus
pesticides for common insect problems. He also said sod, landscape rock,
keystone block and paver bricks will be used on projects but will be off site
unless there are overruns on landscape jobs. The Commission agreed that the
list was acceptable but would not like to see multiple pallets of block and
brick at the nursery.
6. There being no further comments, the Commission adjourned at 8:05 P.M..
Submitted by,
Charles Tooker
City Planner
u
o
o
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
APRIL 11, 1995
1. Chair Schlawin called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M..
Members present: Schlawin, strachan, Thelen, Harmelink.
Members Absent: Gramentz.
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. Chair Schlawin asked if anyone had received minutes of the meeting held on
March 14, 1995. Because no one had, action was deferred until the next regular
meeting on May 9, 1995.
3. The Chairman called upon Jim Bell, Parks and Recreation Director, to
explain the request from Farmington School District for a variance to place two
10 foot high storage sheds at the baseball fields which were developed at the
Middle School. He said that the building design was based upon the dimensions
of an 8 foot sheet of plywood. Once the plywood was nailed in place and a roof
pitch was designed, the shed became 10 feet rather than the required 9 feet
high. He understands tpat this is a preliminary discussion and that the actual
hearing will take place in May. Chair schlawin indicated that he had a problem
with the sequence of the request which comes after the structures have been
built rather than the shed height itself. It represents a continuing pattern
of the School District in proceeding with projects without first checking on
acceptable limits. Other members commented that they did not have a problem
granting a 1 foot height variance for the two sheds which will be voted upon
during the May meeting.
4. City Planner Tooker explained the proposed ordinance dealing with
acceptable improvements in boulevard areas of City street rights of way. The
main purpose of the ordinance is to prevent unequal enforcement in the future.
Member Strachan asked if the ordinance would affect the central boulevards that
will become part of the two collector stre~ts in East Farmington. City planner
Tooker said that the definition deals only with the area between street
pavement and private property to be controlled by individual homeowners.
Member Strachan also questioned the purpose of limiting split ra.il fences to 90
degree angles or less. The city planner said that he didn't have an answer to
that question. MOTION by Strachan, second by Thelen to forward the proposed
ordinance on boulevard treatment to the City Council with the recommendation
that it shall be approved subject to some further refinement of Subsection (E).
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
5. city Planner Tooker reviewed the request from JIT powder Coating Company
for an B foot variance to the City Code requirement limiting openings onto
public rights of way to 32 feet. The original site plan showed a need for a 32
foot variance for an opening of 64 feet. The City Planner said that the
revised site plan includes some unauthorized evergreen plantings in the street
right of way which also will need a variance. The purpose of these trees is to
help screen the loading dock of this facility. Member Strachan asked about the
efficiency of the 40 foot opening, wondering if the proposed curb extensions
into the loading area would be damaged by trucking over time. The City planner
indicated that the operations man for JIT Powder Coatings indicating how the
opening will prevent that type of damage. Chair Schlawin asked about the
ordinance requirement limiting access to 32 feet since many industries will
need very wide loading docks. The Planner responded that these industries will
be required to design the entire loading area on site with access only by
driveway. The purpose of industrial parks is to provide a green space setting
for each industry. It was the consensus of the group that the proposed site
plan is acceptable provided the plant species are detailed and that the
variances will be requested for the evergreens in the street right of way and
an additional 8 feet for the loading area opening onto the site.
6. There being no further business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at 7:35
P.M. .
Submitted by,
Charles Tooker
City Planner
Approved
(---.\
,-)
.U
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
MAY 9, 1995
1. Chair Schlawin called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M..
Members Present: Gramentz, Harmel ink, Schlawin, Thelen.
Members Absent: Strachan.
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. The Chair asked for comments on the minutes of March 14, 1995. MOTION by Thelen,
second by Gramentz to approve the minutes as presented. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. The
Chair asked for consideration of the minutes of April 11, 1995. MOTION by Harmelink,
second by Thelen to approve the minutes of April 11, 1995. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
3. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing scheduled at 7:00 P.M. to discuss the
preliminary plat of prairie Creek Third Addition, a 68 single family lot subdivision
which is a continuation of the prairie Creek PUD. The Developer has made changes in
the landscaping plan as recommended by the City Forester and the comments with
respect to grading and erosion control made by the Soil and Water Conservation
District have been forwarded to the developer, except the one dealing with pre
engineered offset block as a recommended retaining wall system. The specifications
in the plat deal with rock or fieldstone walls which will be grouted, a system that
has been successfully implemented elsewhere and provides a better appearance than the
manufactured system.
o
The recommendation to increase the width of Lots 10 and 12, Block 1 by the City
Engineer do not appear to be justified since they are the same width as the other
lots on that side of the street. The developer has raised a question about the City
Engineer's comment regarding an 18" rise between the top of the curb and garage
floors on Lots 3 thru 7 in Block 2. His plan is to drain those lots along side lot
lines and has provided extra width on the lots to accomplish this. The Engineer also
raised a question about the long temporary cul de sac along Embers Avenue and the
need to sacrifice Lot 31, Block 2 to create a full turn around and to remove the
southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 2 until the area to the south is developed. The
outlot could then be used to add to the next lot fronting on Embers Avenue.
Chair Schlawin opened discussion to the public by asking if a grading permit had
already been issued:
Warren Israelson:
(Developer) Yes.
Member Gramentz:
Will sidewalks continue on Embers Avenue?
Warren Israelson:
Yes.
Mary Hunter:
Will trees stay in the slope area behind Lot 4 in Akin
Park Estates?
Warren Israelson:
Yes.
Robyn Hanson:
May I get a copy of the plat?
provided.)
(A copy of the plat was
o
Planning Minutes
5/9/95
Page 2
MOTION by Thelen, second by Harmelink to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED. MOTION by Harmel ink, second by Gramentz to forward the plat of prairie
Creek Third Addition to the City Council with a recommendation to approve subject to:
a. following the Soil and Water Conservation District recommendations on grading and
erosion control except that which specifies manufactured block retaining walls;
()
b. the Developer working with the City Engineer to resolve questions on the need to
raise the elevation of Lots 3 thru 7 in Block 2; (if raised, it will be
acceptable for the Developer to decrease lot widths.)
c. leaving Lot 31, Block 2 and a portion of Lot 7, Block 5 as outlots to be platted
later when the property to the south is developed and to create a temporary turn
around on the front portion of the outlot to be created on Lot 31;
d. the Developer completing the engineering detail requested by the City Engineer.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
4. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing scheduled for 7:30 P.M. to discuss the
Planned Unit Development of Deer Meadow, an 89 lot single family residential
neighborhood situated immediately north of Hill Dee Subdivision. The major issue
raised earlier with the neighborhood was only one access point to County Road 31.
The Commission recommended a second access at Euclid Avenue which the Developer
included in the most recent proposal. The lot sizes vary in size between 8500 square
feet and 21,600 square feet, with an overall density of 2.56 units per acre. The
property contains one wetland in Outlot B and will include storm water ponding in
Outlots A and B. The City Engineer has,recommended a design speed of 35 mph for the. (~-_').
"S" curve that is required to link Eucl1d Avenue in Hill Dee with the same right of -
way in Deer Meadow. He also recommended a second access from Hill Dee at the western
edge of the plat and a storm sewer along County Road 31. Chair Schlawin opened
discussion to the public.
Dennis Walter:
Currently Euclid Avenue is a quiet street. The opening
into Deer Meadow will increase traffic substantially
right at the park.
Larry McCormick:
Why not extend 179th Street to Pilot Knob Road if a
second.access is needed?
Chair Schlawin:
The County will not authorize a second access that
close together on a county road.
Rosalie Besse:
the park.
residents.
We moved here 18 years ago and like the peace and quiet
of the neighborhood as it is. Many people already use
The added automobile traffic will not be good for the park or the
Mark Langer:
What about grading on the site? Will the entire area
have extensive grading?
'/'.~-~"
U
Planning Minutes
5/9/95 - Page 3
Bob Wiegert:
(Project Engineer) Grading will change the eastern
portion of the PUD by transferring drainage to the
Outlot A. Major regarding will also occur in the western
are two cul de sacs.
c
north and into the pond in
end of the PUD where there
Greg Hudak:
There is already a traffic problem at the park,
particularly during ballgames.
Dennis Kies: We are located west of the house to be removed and are
concerned about backyard privacy. will there be a
fence along Euclid as extended?
planner Tooker: A fence is possible, but only at the front yard setback
line of 20 feet. Anything closer to the street right
of way line would not be high enough to provide for privacy.
John Bakke: The fence line on the south side of the property has
been a problem in the past. The farmer who owned the
property said that it was in one location, whereas our plat indicated that it was in
another. The farmer brought suit against the neighbors and the neighbors counter
sued. The verdict favored the neighborhood. Do you have an idea where the boundary
is at this point?
Dan Westergren: (Project Surveyor)
section corner and
location of this south property line.
The County Surveyor has moved a
there is still a question as to the
o
Ginny Bakke:
I question a 35 mile per hour road next to a park.
Chair SchJ.awin:
That is a recommended design speed, not a speed limit.
Bev Olson:
Has the Developer purchased the property?
Tim GiJ.es:
I have a pending purchase agreement with Mrs. Halstead.
MOTION by Gamentz, second by Thelen to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
Member Gramentz:
What is the time table for development?
Tim GiJ.es:
I would like to plat the first phase this summer and
the second phase in the Spring of 1996.
MOTION by Gramentz, second by Harmelink to forward a recommendation to the City
Council approving the schematic plan of Deer Meadow PUD with two access roads,
including 180th Street to Pilot Knob and Euclid Avenue extending to Lower 182nd
Street West with the responsibility for acquisition of Lot 5, Block 1 of Hill Dee and
development of the connection to Lower 182nd Street West placed upon the Developer,
subject to:
a. following the drainage proposals outlined by the city Engineer;
0 b. resolving the issue of the south property line of the PUD which is common with
the north line of Hill Dee;
Planning Minutes - 5/9/95 - Page 4
c. providing a 35 mile per hour US" curve in the transition between the two Euclid
Avenues.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
5. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing advertised for 8:00 P.M. requested by
Leroy Foley, 20340 Eaves Way, to build a storage building 12 feet high in his rear
yard. He asked if the City Planner had been able to research other nearby
communities to get some understanding of how they deal with this continuing problem.
City Planner Tooker indicated that this was not done but would be a discussion item
at the next meeting. Leroy Foley said that he was unaware of the height limit until
his project was stopped by the Building Official. MOTION by Thelen, second by
Gramentz to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Harmelink,
second by Gramentz to approve the requested 3 foot variance based upon the
anticipated rewording of the zoning code to help eliminate the large number of
variances being requested. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
6. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing advertised for 8:10 P.M. as requested by
the Farmington School District to erect two storage sheds 10 feet in height. The
issue had been discussed at a previous meeting and needs no further deliberation.
MOTION by Harmelink, second by Schlawin to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED. MOTION by Harmelink, second by Gramentz to approve the requested 1 foot
variance based upon the expected review of current height limits for storage sheds.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
7. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing advertised for 8:15 P.M. as requested by
JIT Powder Coatings Company to construct a 40 foot opening on Eaton Avenue in the
Industrial Park. This issue has also been discussed at a previous meeting and needs
no further consideration. MOTION by Thelen, second by Harmelink to close the public
hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Thelen, second by Harmelink to approve the
requested variance for a 40, foot opening onto Eaton Avenue and to plant evergreen
trees within the public right of way to screen the company loading dock. The width
of opening variance is based upon a similar approval of an 8 foot variance for
another property in the Industrial Park. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
()
8. City Planner Tooker outlined changes in the site plan for vermillion River
Housing which is situated immediately north of City Center. In essence the plan has
been improved by turning the townhouse units so that the living area faces the storm
water settling pond rather than the railroad right of way. The site density has
dropped while the number of units increased to 100 from 96. The major concern of
staff is that the access between the apartments and More 4 is a "straight shot" to
Elm Street. The recommendation is to move this access eastward in order to make it
more difficult for people who would wish to travel through the More 4 lot rather than
use the First Street access. Member Harmelink asked if the Developer still plans to
fence the railroad right of way. City Planner Tooker said that currently there is
not a site plan with landscape treatment, but he understands that a fence is still
part of the development concept. MOTION by Schlawin, second by Thelen to forward the
revised Development Plan for Vermillion River Housing to the City Council with a
recommendation to approve. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
/--
U
Planning Minutes - 5/9/95 - Page 5
09.
There being no further business, the Commission adjourned at 9;15 P.M..
Submitted by,
Charles Tooker
City Planner
Approved
o
o
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
JUNE 13, 1995
1. Chair Schlawin called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M..
Members Present: Gramentz, Schlawin, Thelen.
Members Absent: Harmelink, Strachan.
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. The Chair asked for comments on the minutes of May 9, 1995. MOTION by Gramentz,
second by Thelen to approve the minutes as distributed. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
3. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing advertised for 7:00 P.M. as requested by
Heritage Development for the preliminary plat of Nelsen Hills Farm 4th Addition, the
second phase of Nelsen Hills Farm PUD. City Planner Tooker made a presentation
outlining general comments from City staff and the City Engineer, plus those from the
Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. * ~ ~ ~ 7/, t Iri-s--
~
QUESTIONS/COMMENTS:
Emily Rahn: I am concerned about unstable soils on site and the
springs that developed in the area of the Third Addition,
plus an area where the site grading removed soil from our property.
Member Schlawin:
Have there been erosion problems on the your property due
to excavation in the Third Addition?
o Emily Rabn,
John Dobbs:
No.
water in concentrated
how to deal with this
The major problem
are that the site
areas. We are working
problem.
with springs appearing on the hillside
grading exposed sand lenses which shed
with a consultant who will advise us on
Member Schlawin:
What about the stone retaining wall that was included in
the original grading proposal?
John Dobbs:
control, it became
the walls.
The site grading plan was based upon elevations that
exaggerated the slopes on site. With adequate ground
apparent that a 3 to 1 grade could be developed without the use of
Member Schlawin:
Could the Planner indicate the extent of work that needs
to be done on the First through Third additions?
Planner Tooker:
(Outlined the amount of surety in place for each plat but
had no breakdown of the actual tasks that need to be
completed. )
Member Thelen:
I would like some indication of other potential soil
erosion problems.
o John Dobbs,
None that I am aware of.
MOTION by Gramentz, second by Thelen to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED. MOTION by Gramentz, second by Thelen to recommend approval of Nelsen Hills
Fourth Addition to the City Council, subject to the addition of a trunk water line
between the water tower and the north/south collector street west of the gas line,
plus the dedication of drainage easements across the later phases of Nelsen Hills
Farm PUD and additional comments from the City Engineer and Soil and Water
Conservation District with respect to construction. VOTING FOR: Gramentz, Thelen.
ABSTAIN: Schlawin. MOTION CARRIED.
()
\ .
4. City Planner Tooker outlined a duplication in the City Zoning Ordinance with
respect to relocated structures. In essence, structures moved into Farmington are
handled by the Planning Commission either through the conditional use process or by
special exception. It is the recommendation of staff to eliminate the section which
follows the conditional use process to reduce costs for the applicant and as a way to
save time in dealing with these buildings. In addition, the section dealing with
special exceptions should be relabled "Relocated Structures". MOTION by Schlawin,
second by Gramentz to recommend that the City Council repeal Section 10-6-16 and to
change the heading for Section 10-8-7 from Special Exceptions to Relocated
Structures. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
5. Chair Schlawin recognized Roger Randall who has requested approval to move the
Hed house from the Spruce Street entrance to Lot 2, Block 1 of East Farmington.
Since the previous action recommends elimination of the conditional use process,
staff recommends taking action on the request on its own merit. MOTION by Thelen,
second by Gramentz to authorize relocation of the former Red house subject to a
surety of $5,000 being provided by Mr. Randall and a certificate of insurance
provided by the actual movers. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
6. City Planner Tooker brought a request from Steve Rader, purchaser of 19366
Ellington Trail in Limerock Ridge for the Commission to consider the elimination of
one tree from his lot in the approved landscape plan for this plat. As described,
appears that there will be ample room for two trees, a street light, and the Rader
driveway. MOTION by Schlawin, second by Gramentz to recommend against a variance
request should it be submitted based upon a lack of justification.
(
',""-.....--/
\
J
it
7. City Planner Tooker outlined a request from Dave Finnegan to approve a sign
permit for Heating Innovations which will be located in the former Farmington Ford
building at Third and Elm Streets. In essence, the code requires a sign plan for all
multiple tenant buildings. It was the consensus of those present that without a sign
plan that has been approved by the Commission, there can be no further sign permits
issued at this address.
8. There being no further business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at 8:00 P.M..
Submitted by,
cY~ tf!fl,~
Charles Tooker
City Planner
Approved
o
o
c
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
JULY J.J., J.995
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chair Schlawin.
Members Present: Larson, Schlawin, Strachan, Thelen.
Members Absent: Gramentz. (Arrived at 7:05 P.M.)
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. Chair Schlawin requested that an Oath of Office be repeated by the City planner
for new member Larson. The Oath having been administered, Mr. Larson was welcomed
by the members present.
3. Chair Schlawin asked for comments on the minutes of June 13, 1995. None being
offered, the Chair asked for the section dealing with Nelsen Hills Farm 4th Addition
to be amended to reflect that boulevard sod has not yet been installed in the 1st
and 2nd Additions of Nelsen Hills Farm. MOTION by Thelen, second by Gramentz to
approve the minutes as amended by the specific reference to Nelsen Hills Farm 4th
Addition discussion. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
4. City Planner Tooker introduced the subject of signage for individual businesses
located in multiple tenant buildings. The question was raised by Dave Finnegan
concerning his building located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Third
and Elm Streets. One business has an approved sign, but two businesses have signs
without permits. A fourth would like its own freestanding sign. The Commission
agreed that all business operations in this building that need signs should follow
the design and materials used by Giff's Detailing which did secure a sign permit.
City Planner Tooker read a letter from Dave Finnegan which states as follows:
"Starr Automotive and Trevis Transmission will display their business names
in the same manner as Giff's Detailing. FEI will display their business
sign free-standing directly in frqnt of their business.n
MOTION by Strachan, second by Schlawin to require that all business signs on the
former Farmington Ford building conform with the lettering size style, color and
material of the existing Giff's Detailing sign mounted on the wood soffit above
their doors except for FEr, which will have a freestanding two sided sign mounted in
the planter in front of the building. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
5. City planner Tooker reviewed the request from the Farmington Chamber of Commerce
to introduce "sandwich boardn signs into the City Sign Ordinance by replacing
existing wording in Section 4-3-3(B}5 - Portable Signs with the following:
"Established local businesses shall be allowed to display on the sidewalk
adjacent to their business, a portable two sided sign, up to two feet wide
and three feet high, during regular business hours. Such signs shall be
placed in frqnt of the business they promote and shall not restrict pedestrian
traffic flow.n
The Commission reviewed the request, considered reducing the size of the signs, but
decided against that action. Member Strachan asked if the City Attorney should be
invited to comment on potential City liability problems. It was decided that the
Attorney would be present during the City Council discussion of this request and
could make the Council aware of any potential liability issuesatithat time. MOTION
by Gramentz, second by Larson to forward the wording quoted above to the City
Council with a recommendation for it to be approved. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
. <~'w<. '_.~ _.:-~.,._",,:.,,_,......~__~"
6. City Planner Tooker then described the request from Budget Mart to erect a
second pylon sign at their convenience center on pilot Knob Road. Chair Schlawin
indicated that there isn't a need for two signs, but that Budget Mart could create a
dual purpose pylon advertising both the bank and the motor fuel/convenience store 01:
to vacate the existing Budget Mart sign. Other members agreed. The consensus of
those present was that each of the lots in this business strip could have one pylon
sign and there is not justification to introduce the possibility of two pylon signs
per lot.
7. City Planner Tooker outlined the complaint against God's Country Nursery signs
which involve more than one two sided 30 square foot sign. The consensus of those
present was that the owner, Dave Olson, should receive a letter indicating that all
illegal signs need to be removed within 30 days or by August 11, 1995.
8. City Planner Tooker introduced the subject of a Comprehensive plan Amendment to
update the 1982 plan. While a draft plan was prepared in 1990, it was never adopted
and the City, instead, focused attention on an annexation study which emphasized the
concept of community by the year 2020. Since annexation failed and the Council has
not made a decision on whether or not to appeal the decision of the Municipal Board,
it is time for the Planning Commission to draw from the work that has been done and
to develop a plan that will be a useful guide for development through the year 2020,
when Farmington will more than double in population size.
The plan will need to focus on economic development, with emphasis on expansion of
the Industrial Park and Downtown. The Industrial Park has ample opportunity to
expand given its location, whereas the Downtown will need to leap the Vermillion
River in order to provide commercial space that will adequately serve a community of
16,000 to 20,000 inhabitants. As the City matures, there will be more need for
multiple family housing and, to encourage this, more emphasis will be placed upon
the Planned Unit Development process. Land adjoining the existing downtown will be
explored to identify areas of low density development that may be potential sites
for townhouses and apartments without destroying the "front porch" feeling of the
oldest neighborhoods.
Another emphasis will be to provide a definitive study of the Highway 3 corridor
which will attempt to protect existing investment by identifying business
development nodes without falling into the trap of a "Lake Street" environment.
Members of the Commission were enthusiastic about beginning the planning process and
anxious to get started. A departure from earlier comprehensive planning efforts
will involve land use recommendations for property outside the City, including
recommendations for the timing of MUSA expansion. Chair Schlawin indicated that he
expects the Commission to be more actively involved in developing planning
recommendations and suggested that the Commission should invite the City Council and
both the Park Board and School Board to separate meetings as the planning process
evolves. Member strachan suggested that a portion of each meeting be set aside to
discuss an aspect of the Comprehensive Plan. There was general agreement of the
members that the Comprehensive Plan update should become Priority One of the
Commission.
9. There being no further business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at 8:45 P.M..
Submitted by,
&~ If! ~~
-C)
Charles Tooker
City Planner
Approved
c
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
AUGUST 8, 1995
~. Chair Schlawin called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M..
Members Present: Gramentz, Larson, Schlawin, strachan, Thelen.
Members Absent: None.
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. The Chair asked for comments on the minutes of July 11, 1995. MOTION by
Strachan, second by Gramentz to approve the minutes of July 11, 1995 as printed.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
o
3. Chair schlawin opened the public hearing scheduled for 7:00 P.M. to discuss the
preliminary plat of Deer Meadow, a 90 lot subdivision situated on the west side of
pilot Knob Road immediately south of the Lakeville city line. A request from the
Parks and Recreation Commission to include a sidewalk trail the entire length of
180th Street was brought up during the discussion, as well as a proposal for the City
to acquire Lot 10, Block 5 for space to place a recreational climbing structure
adjoining the wetland storm water drainage basin in Outlot B. Comments from the City
of Lakeville indicate no need for a sanitary sewer stub into the City of Lakeville as
shown on the plans. The Soil and Water Conservation District mentioned the need to
investigate dumps on site for buried toxins and offered its usual comments on
appropriate seed mixtures around wetlands and disturbed upland areas, plus the need
for erosion control blankets on 3:1 and greater slopes. The City Planner outlined
the necessity to build a "Tn intersection at the transition between Eventide Way and
Euclid Avenue and suggested more variety in the street tree species. In addition,
the City Engineer requested consideration of the following:
a) The need for a wetland alteration permit and hydraulics study for the NURP pond
proposed on Outlot B.
b) The dedication of Outlots A and B to the City for stormwater management or NURP
ponds.
c) The need for a 20 foot separation between private property and the 3:1 slope for
ponding plus a 10:1 bench at the natural water level which shall include wetland
plantings.
d) Inspection of the site to confirm or deny the presence of dumps and the proper
disposal of found material.
e) A right turn lane on County Road 31.
f) The City share of the cost of the traffic light at 180th street and County Road 31
is recommended to be borne by the developer.
g) A trunk water main to serve an area beyond this plat shall be installed and
credited within the development contract.
[] h)
A utility service and access to the 5 acre exception must be provided.
Planning conun~SS~OIl lVl.LUUl.Ci:>
VI -, --
i) Additional street trees are needed in the right of way of Euclid Avenue and 180th
Street adjoining Outlot A and the..s acre exception to the plat.
j) A storm sewer outlet shall be routed along CSAH 31 to the large diameter storm
sewer near 182n~ Street.
(J
k) The developer will be required to loop the water main system.
l) Additional comments on the PUD proposal are also recommended to be incorporated
into any approval of this plat.
The Engineer also suggested that Lot 10, Block 15 is not a buildable site since the
lot doesn't provide a 16 1/2 foot buffer area separating it from the existing
wetland.
Chair schlawin opened discussion to the public.
Ginny Bakke:
I am interested in which line will be recognized as the
south property line of Deer Meadow.
Dan Westergren:
This plat will recognize existing platting of Hill Dee
and agree with its north boundary.
Tim Giles: I do not agree that I should pay for
cost of the signal at lSOth Street.
leg of the light or the portion which enters the Deer Meadow plat.
the entire city
I will pay for one
Member Gramentz
I am curious why the POD was approved with only one
access.
Chris Galler: Hill Dee was developed without an access. It seemed
wrong to require this developer to correct a past
mistake. The City council did not wish to burden the developer with the cost of a
house and providing a street connection to Hill Dee.
Member Gramentz: Access to parks is a concern. This development will
not have good access to a city park.
Member Schlawin: What about on-site dumping?
Tim Giles: The dumping area actually is in Lakeville and not
included within the area of this plat.
Robert Gallivan: Downhill from the dump site there appears to be a shed
with old building materials scattered about and that
does appear to be on the site.
Diana Keyes: What about the sewer line and a park for children?
planner Tooker: There will be no park other than a climbing structure
adjoining the wetland as recommended by the parks and
Recreation Commission.
C)
-:...'...~""7",~:.~T:i.~'"'.T.~~:r:7?Ir.{.';<>~~..;. ~.->"
. .'. .:..' ,.,'
Planning Minutes - 8/8/95 - Page 3
Member Gramentz:
Is it correct that the County is now requiring 150 feet
in right of way for county roads? This will mean a
Also, there should be a stub out designed to meet the
temporary turnaround at the west end of 180th Street.
o
dedication of 75 feet.
Halstead property and a
Tim Giles: We would like to be able to improve 180th Street to the
west property line but barricade the entrance since no
lot will have access from this short stub.
Member Schlawin: When were the Engineer's comments on this plat
available? I feel that there are a number of topics
raised in this material that are difficult to respond to on short notice.
Planner Tooker: The memorandum is dated today.
Member Schlawin: Are there additional comments. If not, I will
entertain a motion to close the hearing.
MOTION by Gramentz, second by Thelen to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED. MOTION by Gramentz, second by Larson to recommend approval of the
preliminary plat of Deer Meadow subject to comments of the Planner, city Engineer,
the Soil and Water Conservation District and the City of Lakeville. VOTING IN FAVOR:
Gramentz, Larson, Strachan, Thelen. OPPOSED: Schlawin. MOTION CARRIED.
c
4. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing scheduled for 7:30 P.M. to discuss the
relocation of the Red house from the east frontage road of Highway 3 to Lot 2 in
Block 1 of East Farmington First Addition. City Planner Tooker explained that the
hearing was scheduled in anticipation of the City Council action on August 7, 1995
which amended the City Code with respect to moving structures. The Planning
Commission action taken during the July meeting followed a section of the City Code
that required no public hearing. The Council, on the other hand, determined that a
public hearing which notifies adjoining property owners is valuable in the decision
making process. This hearing will satisfy the requirements of the amended code:
Corporation
Farmington.
My wife and I plan to take the existing house and move
it to a parcel in the new development. sienna
requires that the moved house shall meet the covenants of East
Roger Randall:
Tim Giles: An 8:12 pitch on all roofs is required in East
Farmington. Does this house meet the requirements of
the Architectural Control Committee?
Roger Randall:
The Committee is currently made up of principals in
Sienna Corporation and Sienna has sold me the lot. The
quickly as I can put together all of the required
Committee will take.action as
documentation.
Pat Akin: I am opposed to the process thin house moving request
has followed. The developer mentioned no house moving
when the plat was approved. The house is out of place. I cannot believe the
~. . Commission would approve it. I am also concerned that once the house is moved and
~ fixed up, it will be sold. It will cheapen the development.
Planning Minutes - 8/8/95 - Page 4
Member Schlawin:
This could happen in any development.
Pat Akin:
The planning process has been bad and I hold you {City
Planner} responsible for it.
Chris Galler: There are only six issues that the Planning Commission
needs to evaluate in considering the relocation of this
structure. Tax Increment Financing as it relates to this property has been raised as
an issue, but TI~ criteria is being met. In addition, there are a number of new
developments that include adjoining older homes. The stegmaier homestead and the
Akin House are but two examples. The six criteria have to do with the age of
structure, its value and the architecture in relationship to the adjoining
neighborhood. In addition, the property has up to 90 days to be completed on the
outside.
Henry Iwerks:
It takes money to make improvements. I hope Mr.
Randall has done his homework.
Pat Akin: The Randall lot has been raised and will dam up water
on my property unless drainage has been properly
planned. I would like this entered into the minutes.
Henry Iwerks:
The Planning Commission has lots of power in dealing
with house moving.
Member Schlawin:
Unless there are additional comments, I will entertain
a motion to close the public hearing.
MOTION by Strachan, second by Thelen to close the hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Member strachan was excused at 8:30 P.M..
MOTION by Gramentz, second by Thelen to approve the requested relocation of the
former Hed house subject to approval by the Architectural Control Committee with the
stipulation that all exterior work shall be complete within 90 days and that
$5,000.00 surety shall be placed with the City Finance Director prior to moving the
building. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
5. Chair Schlawin opened discussion of a requested waiver of platting from Marlene
Halstead to divide a five acre parcel adjoining Deer Meadow into two lots. City
Planner Tooker suggested that the north line of the south parcel should be in line
with the south line of Eventide Way so that the larger portion of this split can be
efficiently subdivided later. In addition, the plat of Deer Meadow will need an
additional 70 foot stub street into the exception to assure that the smaller lot has
frontage on a City street.
Tim Giles:
I can provide the stub but do not wish to pave it at
the present time.
Member Schlawin:
I would not have a problem with the lack of paving, but
do. believe that the dedication is necessary.
u
o
c
o
- _._~-----
- - --
Planning Minutes - 8/8/95------page5-
MOTION by Thelen, second by Gramentz to approve the split provided that the south lot
is 130 feet wide and that a 60 foot wide by 70 foot deep stub shall be dedicated to
the City of Farmington for street purposes from the north lot. The south lot shall
include no direct access to County Road 31. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
6. City Planner Tooker presented an informal request from Gordon and Twylla Chant
from 621 Oak Street to consider a rear and front yard variance to extend steps and a
deck into each one. The rear yard variance is for 3 feet 10 inches and the front is
for approximately 13 feet based upon existing front yard setbacks in this block. The
front yard setbacks in the original Town of Farmington plat vary greatly since there
are so few housing units per block, particularly along the north/south streets. The
setback for housing across Oak Street facing 7th Street appears to be 10 feet in
contrast with the 33 feet established by the housing in this block. Because the deck
is proposed at 13 feet in width, it will conform with setbacks acceptable in most
areas of the City. There were no objections to the plan as proposed. The City
Planner will notify the Chants and they will probably file a formal request for
hearing.
7. There being no further business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at 9:00 P.M..
Submitted by,
Charles Tooker
City Planner
Approved
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
SEPTEMBER 12, 1995
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chair Schlawin.
Members Present: Gramentz, Larson, Strachan, Schlawin.
Members Absent: Thelen.
Also Present: City planner Tooker.
2. The Chair asked for comments on the minutes of August 8, 1995. MOTION by
Gramentz, second by Larson to approve the minutes of August 8, 1995 as presented.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
o
3. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing advertised for 7:00 P.M. as requested by
Gordon and Twyla Chant of 621 Oak street to secure front and side yard variances to
build a deck and steps to the kitchen entrance. The deck variance is complicated
because of the deep setbacks along Seventh Street in this block. In essence, the
existing setback is 30 feet for this block, whereas the minimum setback in new
residential neighborhoods is 20 feet. The steps will extend three feet into the side
yard. Member Gramentz was interested in the materials that will be used and the
timing of improvements. The Chants described the materials as being consistent with
the architectural character of the house and that the kitchen addition will be built
this year followed by the deck improvement next year. Member Strachan wanted some
assurance that the deck variance would observe the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance.
Members agreed that the improvements in the older part of Farmington required some
flexibility in interpretation. MOTION by Gramentz, second by Larson to close the
public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Strachan, second by Schlawin to
approve the requested front and side yard variances as illustrated in the submittal
site plan. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
4. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing advertised for 7:15 P.M. as requested by
Robert Hyde of 719 Centennial Circle to move a garage from the Twin Cities airport
expansion site to his property. The action, if approved, will allow replacement of
a single stall garage for a two stall garage. Mr. Hyde said that the garage will be
resided with the same materials that are used on the house. The City Planner said
that the garage is of a size that will fit between the existing pool deck and the
required twenty foot front yard setback line. MOTION by Gramentz, second by Larson
to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Strachan, second by
Gramentz to approve the relocation of the garage as requested subject to submitting
$5,000.00 cash for security, provision of a certificate of insurance issued to the
building mover, and a commitment on the part of the landowner to have the exterior of
the building complete within sixty days following its move to this site. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED.
5. City Planner Tooker discussed a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
regarding setbacks along arterial streets. The need for a clean up of language
relates to current discussions on the relocation of County Road 31. Some wording
changes were suggested by the Planning Commission resulting in a recommendation to
forward a new paragraph under 10-4-1(J) to the City Council as follows:
[]
(J) The minimum front yard setback for all new construction in all districts
adjacent to minor arterial streets included in the Thoroughfare Plan of the
Farmington Comprehensive Plan shall be fifty feet (50') from the planned right
of way line.
()
..__J
MOTION by Strachan, second by Larson to forward the above wording to the City Council
with a recommendation that it be approved. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
6. The Commission then discussed a draft of Assets and Liabilities and Housing
Characteristics which will be included in a revised Comprehensive Plan. The
principle comment suggested that multiple housing is more acceptable near activity
centers like the downtown where there are more employment opportunities and things to
do for entertainment.
7. Tony Joslyn of Flagstaff Avenue requested that the Planning Commission discuss
their thoughts on allowing used car sales as a permitted use in the Agricultural
Districts. The Commission suggested that he find space within existing business
zoning districts.
8. The Commission was asked to consider a change in location for the Hed house,
currently owned by Roger Randall. The Members agreed that the Dallas Haas property
would be suitable.
9. The meeting adjourned at 8:45 P.M..
Submitted by,
()
Charles Tooker
City Planner
Approved
o
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
OCTOBER 10, 1995
1. Chair Schlawin called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M..
Members Present: Gramentz, Larson, Schlawin, Thelen.
Members Absent: Strachan.
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. Chair Schlawin asked for comments on the minutes of September 12, 1995. MOTION
by Larson, second by Gramentz to approve the minutes of September 12, 1995 as
distributed. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
3. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing requested by Dakota County for a Wetland
Alteration Permit for the wetlands impacted by the reconstruction of County Road 50
between the Lakeville city line and the bridge over the Vermillion River at Rambling
River Park. The information provided showed the impacted wetland, the mitigation
area on the stella Hammer land, and the City Engineer's recommendations on
improvements which were forwarded to the County on September 15, 1995. The
Commission asked for clarification of specific points and were satisfied by the
responses. MOTION by Thelen, second by Larson to close the public hearing. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Gramentz, second by Thelen to approve the wetland
alteration permit subject to the implementation of all comments made by the City
Engineer on September 15, 1995. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
o
4. City Planner Tooker presented the request from Heritage Development to replace
the 4 unit townhouse building with 4 duplex buildings for a net increase of 4
dwelling units. The Planner suggested that units 3 and 4, and units 7 and 8, be
turned and offset up to 10 feet to cut the "row house" effect which could be observed
along Pilot Knob Road. Chair Schlawin requested that the cul-de-sac be redesigned to
include a central grass panel to cut down on the large expanse of pavement in the
cul-de-sac. Member Larson requested a minimum height of five feet for the berm along
pilot Knob Road. Member Thelen requested substantial plantings in all of the yards
fronting along public streets.
The Planner explained that the draft Comprehensive Plan includes medium density
development over the entire site and that the developer now understands that there is
a demand for higher density development in the northwest area of Farmington. A prime
consideration for the request is that a homeowners' association of eight units is
more likely to succeed than one including only four units. It has also been
illustrated in Farmington that duplex units can be sold more readily than the
"middle" units in townhouse clusters.
MOTION by Larson, second by Thelen to recommend a change in the PUD plan by replacing
four townhouse units with eight duplex units at the intersection of pilot Knob Road
and Euclid Path in Nelsen Hills Farm Third Addition subject to:
a. modification of the cul-de-sac to include a central grass panel;
b. reorientation of units 3 and 4, and units 7 and 8;
c. construction of a five foot berm adjoining pilot Knob Road; and
d. development of a planting plan emphasizing deciduous tree planting in all front
yards.
D
VOTING FOR: Gramentz, Larson, Thelen. ABSTAIN: Schlawin. MOTION CARRIED.
5. City Planner Tooker reviewed the request from Kwik Trip to reorient the proposed
service center building at the northwest corner of the Elm and Third Street
intersection without going through another conditional use hearing. The Members had (~')
no problem with eliminating a hearing provided that some changes are made in the 'j
proposal, including:
a. including red brick facing on three sides of the building;
b. creating a planter rather than stripped paving at the southeast corner of the
building;
c. submission of a lighting plan for the site;
d. submission of a revised planting plan following suggestions by the City Planner
including boulevard trees along Elm and Third Streets.
MOTION by Schlawin, second by Thelen to advise Kwik Trip that a conditional use
hearing is not required provided that the company can follow the recommendations
outlined in the above discussion. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
6. City Planner Tooker discussed the housing plan information provided in connection
with the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and a proposal by Dakota County HRA to
prepare a five year action plan for all participating communities in the County. He
suggested that since no one had an information packet in advance of the meeting, it
might be better to hold a discussion during a special meeting on October 24, 1995 at
7:00 P.M.. The members agreed to hold a special session on housing issues.
7. City Planner Tooker presented the proposal of Moleski Associates for a fence
design to be installed adjoining the More 4 service court to protect the adjoining
neighborhood from the loading area. A fence was included in the site plan but not
implemented when the store was built. The Commission agreed that the proposed fence
is acceptable.
8. City Planner Tooker presented a Fire Department request to extend the driveway
width an additional 24 feet bringing the opening onto County Road 31 to 84 feet. The
Commission agreed that a planter separating the proposed new driveway from the
existing would not be workable and that they would accept a variance request.
9. Member Gramentz asked about two projects that have not been completed. The first
includes the Utin shed" owned by Dave Finnegan which has not been converted to an
apartment building and the second includes Lamperts, which has never attempted to
follow an agreed upon site plan. City Planner Tooker was instructed to forward
letters to both requesting that these issues be resolved.
10. There being no .further business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at 8:45 P.M..
Submitted by,
Charles Tooker
City planner
Approved
C)
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL
NOVEMBER 1, 1995
1. Chair Schlawin called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M..
Members Present: Gramentz, Larson, Schlawin, Thelen.
Members Absent: Strachan.
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. The Chair opened the public hearing scheduled for 7:00 P.M. to discuss the
request from Roger Randall to move the ~Hed" house from its temporary location south
of Spruce Street to property owned by the Dallas Haas estate, approximately 100 feet
to the south. The house will remain in the neighborhood where it was built and,
therefore, meets all of the criteria listed in Section 10-8-~ of the City Code. The
City already holds surety from the previous hearing when a move was approved into
East Farmington. Dennis Gramentz asked about timing of the move and improvements
that will be made. Mr. Randall responded that the blocks for a basement will be laid
immediately after closing and a move would be completed before the end of the year.
He indicated that he would be using the rest of the winter to have interior work
completed. The discussion of on site landscaping evolved to a point where a plan
needs to be developed prior to December 1, 1995 and implemented by June 1, 1996.
However, the Commission would consider an extension of the implementation deadline if
asked. MOTION by Thelen, second by Larson to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED. MOTION by Gramentz, second by Thelen to approve relocation of the former
\\Hed" house to the Dallas Haas property as indicated on the site plan reviewed during
the meeting subject to:
~. the development and implementation of a landscape plan;
. a certificate of insurance from the house mover; and
. the City retaining the surety until the house is moved and the landscaping has
been installed.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
3. Chair Schlawin recognized Tim Giles who is interested in purchasing three quad
home lots in Dakota County Estates 9th Addition, but wishes to increase the density
from 12 to 20 units. City Planner Tooker outlined the procedure for a major
amendment to the PUD which involves a public hearing before the City Council.
Several options were discussed and, since Mr. Giles was interested in securing input
from the Commission, the members present indicated that they would consider
increasing the density by four units but not eight. Mr. Giles said he would develop
a plan for later discussion.
4. City Planner Tooker presented the request from Emma pohl to extend MUSA to her
lot on the east side of Trunk Highway 3. The request involves a minor amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan which must be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. MOTION by
Gramentz, second by Schlawin to forward a recommendation to the City Council for
O.'iJProval of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan by extending MUSA by one lot
;..\""ct to approval by the Metropolitan Council. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
Planning Minutes - 11/1/95 (Special) - Page 2
5. City Planner Tooker reviewed the material developed during the past two months
regarding housing as background for the Housing Goals Agreement required for
participation in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. The Housing Goals
Agreement is being recommended to cover 5 years rather than the 14 indicated to make
it correspond with the city's 5 Year Capital Improvement Program. He reviewed the
actual goals as outline in the October 25, 1995 memo to the City council on the
Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. After a general discussion of housing activity
and the challenge offered by this program, the following motion was introduced.
MOTION by Schlawi~, second by Thelen to recommend approval of the Housing Goals
Agreement and proposed resolution electing to participate in the Local Housing
Incentives Account Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED.
(~)
'.......__.....-/~
6. City Planner Tooker described to the Commission the request from John Tschohl to
speak directly to the City Council regarding an appeal of the City Planner's decision
that his request to further divide the Southeast Quarter of Section 25 constituted a
premature subdivision as described in the City code. Chair Schlawin said that this
discussion has gone on for a very long time and, while the proposal is slightly
different from previous requests, it is still contrary to the intent of the current
implementation programs of the comprehensive plan. MOTION by Schlawin, second by
Thelen to recommend against additional divisions of the Tschohl property until
utilities can be made available. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
7. There being no further business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at 8:30 P.M..
Submitted by,
Charles Tooker
City planner
Approved
i"'---...
L)
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
NOVEMBER 14, 1995
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chair Schlawin.
Members Present: Larson, Schlawin, Strachan, Thelen.
Members Absent: Gramentz.
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. The Chair asked for comments on the minutes of meetings held on October 10th and
November 1st. MOTION by Thelen, second by Larson to approve the October 10, 1995
minutes as distributed. VOTING FOR: Larson, Schlawin, Thelen. ABSTAIN: Strachan.
MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Thelen, second by Larson to approve the November 1, 1995
minutes as distributed. VOTING FOR: Larson, Schlawin, Thelen. ABSTAIN: Strachan.
MOTION CARRIED.
o
3. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing advertised for 7:00 P.M. as requested by
the Farmington Fire Department for a variance to extend an existing driveway access
of 60 feet width to 84 feet to accommodate the new stall added to the fire station on
Denmark Avenue. The staff recommended the addition of landscaping to the site plan,
particularly on the north side of the building to compliment the mature plantings on
the south and east side. Fire Chief Kuchera indicated that he did not have a problem
with this request. MOTION by Thelen, second by Strachan to close the public hearing.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Strachan, second by Thelen to approve the variance
allowing an 84 foot wide access on the west side of Denmark Avenue, contingent upon
the development and implementation of a planting plan introducing "foundation"
materials adjoining the north side of the building as well as two additional
deciduous trees in the yard north of the building and east of the drainfield. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED.
4. Chair Schlawin opened the hearing requested by Dennis and Edna Sue Perro for a
variance which would allow them to retain an 11 1/2 foot high storage shed which was
built in their backyard before they were made aware that the maximum height is 9
feet. The Commission was provided photographs of the lot and building by Mr. Perro,
together with an analysis of the site emphasizing the large lot, mature trees which
screen the yard, and the low elevation of this yard compared with the new housing
units in Silver Springs. MOTION by Thelen, second by Larson to close the public
hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Strachan, second by Thelen to approve the
requested variance based upon the relatively low elevation of the Perro lot compared
with the lots to the rear, the ability of existing trees and shrubs to screen the
storage shed, and the relatively large size of this lot compared with adjoining uses.
APIF, MOTION CARRI:ED.
o
5. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing requested by Donald and Brenda Hunter
for a variance to extend an existing garage four feet into a utility easement and
within one foot of the east property line. Mr. Hunter indicated that the utility
easement is not in use and the church next door has no planned use for the area
adjoining his lot. City Planner Tooker said that if the Commission is sympathetic to
the request, the Church would need to agree with a shift of the easement five feet to
the east and a grand total of ten feet of church property dedicated as an easement
[or future utility use as needed. MOTION by Larson, second by Thelen to close the
Planning Minutes - 11/14/95 - Page 2
public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Schlawin, second by Thelen to
approve the requested variance provided that there is no existing use of the easement
and that the ten foot easement is shifted entirely onto the church property. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED. Following approval there was a discussion as to what would be an
acceptable method of moving the easement. City Planner Tooker suggested the need for
a survey of the easement and a vote by the church board giving up for public use a
ten foot wide utility and drainage easement along the Hunter property line and,
possibly, a Gopher One Call to clarify that there is no use of the present easement.
At some future time, the City Council would be able to vacate the existing Hunter
easement.
(~
,-------.
6. Chair Schlawin opened the public hearing requested by South River Homes, Inc. for
a variance to allow the home at 18444 Eldorado Way to stay, as placed, five feet from
the west property line. City Planner Tooker indicated that a survey mistake placed
the house five rather than the required six feet from the side lot line. Member
Larson was concerned about this mistake and would not like to see the request
repeated by this or any other builder. MOTION by Strachan, second by Larson to close
the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Larson, second by Strachan to
approve a one foot variance to allow the house on Lot 7, Block 5 of Dakota County
Estates 8th Addition to remain as constructed at 5 feet from the west property line.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
7. City Planner Tooker presented the request' from Warren Israelson to expand the
MUSA boundary in Section 13 by ten acres in order to complete the PUD as originally
planned. The actual area involves 17 acres but 7 acres in the second addition is
actually a ponding area and could be transferred to keep the requested expansion to a
minimum. MOTION by Schlawin, second by Thelen to recommend that the City Council C.-
request a 10 acre increase to the MUSA boundary within Section 13 to allow the ---
Developer the right to complete the platting of prairie Creek PUD. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
8. There being no further business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at 8:15 P.M..
Submitted by,
Charles Tooker
City Planner
Approved
CJ
o
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
DECEMBER 12, 1995
1. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Thelen at 7:00 P.M.
Members Present: Gramentz, Larson, Strachan, Thelen.
Members Absent: Schlawin (arrived at 7:15 P.M.)
Also Present: City Planner Tooker.
2. Vice Chair Thelen asked for comments on the minutes of November 14, 1995. MOTION
by strachan, second by Larson to approve the minutes of November 14, 1995 as
distributed. VOTING FOR: Larson, strachan, Thelen. ABSTAIN: Gramentz. MOTION
CARRIED.
c
3. Vice Chair Thelen opened the public hearing advertised for 7:00 P.M. as requested
by Tim Giles to amend the PUD for Dakota County Estates on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 3,
of the 9th Addition by increasing the number of housing units from 12 to 16. City
planner Tooker indicated a need for a site plan with more detail since the City
Engineer had raised questions about stormwater ponding, the lack of a drive through
access that can be used by City vehicles responsible for trash collection and
separation of driveway intersections from public street intersections. Tim Giles
raised questions about the need for NURP ponds if the density is not changed, or
going to another building type which would involve two eight unit buildings rather
than 4 four unit buildings. The Commission agreed that there appeared to be too many
options still being considered for them to reach a decision. Mr. Giles indicated
that he wanted to question the City Engineer regarding the need for an on-site
stormwater management detention pond. MOTION by Larson, second by Schlawin to
continue the public hearing until January 9, 1996 at 7:00 P.M.. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
4. Vice Chair Thelen opened the public hearing advertised for 7:15 P.M. as requested
by Guy and Michelle Kinney of 5311 Upper 182nd street to retain a storage shed which
is both too tall and too close to the side lot line. The Commission was impressed by
the quality of the shed, but did believe it interfered with an adjoining property
both because of the height and closeness to the property line. Member Strachan
suggested the need for administrative review of each storage shed since most variance
requests concerning sheds are filed because the applicant was unaware of the height
limit. Member schlawin agreed, since the Commission only acts on those non-complying
sheds that are noticed. There are many others that possibly do not meet code
requirements, but have had no complaints. Mr. Kinney said that he would be able to
move the shed relatively easily, but that removal of the top two feet could become
very expensive. MOTION by Gramentz, second by Larson to close the public hearing.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Strachan, second by schlawin to require Mr. Kinney
to move the storage shed at least two feet further from the west property line and to
regrade the new site so that the building floor level is at least one foot lower than
it is at the present time. The new location and elevation shall be accomplished by
June 1, 1996. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Member Strachan asked if there would be general
support on the commission for a new procedure that would require all storage shed
o
requests to be reviewed by City staff and the addition of a nominal cost for such a
review. There was a consensus that the staff should investigate the proposal.
5. City Planner Tooker announced that the City Council would like a volunteer from
the Planning Commission to serve on the Joint Planning Board with Empire Township.
Member Schlawin indicated that he would volunteer, but encouraged others to also do
so. No other volunteers emerged from the discussion.
6. City Planner Tooker presented a concept plan for the remainder of the undeveloped
land adjoining TroyHill. He said that the Developer has decided to prepare a PUD for
the site area which has not been developed. The POD would likely be ready for
presentation at the meeting on January 9, 1996.
7. City Planner Tooker reviewed a memo prepared for the City Council which outlines
MUSA needs for approximately ten years into the future. Questions from the
Commission ranged from the advisability of establishing a 300 housing unit per year
cap and how such a cap would be administered; to why the Planning Commission was not
invited to provide its input into this policy. The Commission was particularly
interested that current MUSA includes only a three year land supply.
8. There being no additional business, the Commission agreed to adjourn at 9:05 P.M.
Submitted by,
Charles Tooker
City Planner
Approved