Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.06.23 Work Session Packet CITY OF Meeting Location: FARMINGTONFarmington City Hall 430 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA February 6, 2023 5:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVE AGENDA 3. DISCUSSION ITEMS (a) Summergate- Meadowview Preserve Update(30 Minutes) (b) Ebert Downtown Apartment- Project Update and Overview(45 Minutes) 4. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE UPDATE S. CITY ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE 6. ADJOURN CITY OF 0 43o Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARMINGTON © 651-28o-68o0 Jl'J j FarmingtonMN.gov TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Summergate- Meadowview Preserve Update(30 Minutes) DATE: February 6, 2023 INTRODUCTION Representatives from Summergate Development, LLC ("developer")will be present at the February 6th City Council worksession to discuss their development, Medowview Preserve. DISCUSSION The preliminary plat(attached)was approved for the Meadowview Preserve development by the City Council on June 27, 2022. The approved preliminary plat consists of 134 single-family residential lots on 61.07 acres with a net density of 3.03 dwelling units per acre. The minimum lot area with the approved preliminary plat was 8,119 square feet, with an average lot area of 9,659 square feet. The minimum lot width and depth of lots in the preliminary plat are 60 feet and 130 feet, respectively. The developer submitted a final plat application package for Meadowview Preserve's initial phase this past July but withdrew that application shortly thereafter as market conditions where beginning to shift forcing the developer to re-evaluate the unit make-up of the development. Attached to this memorandum, please find two alternative development sketches that have been provided by the developer for the Meadowview Preserve site. The developer is trying to gauge the city's appetite for increased density/different mix of unit types on this site. Alternate Sketch Plan (A) Both sketch plans utilize the same road configuration that was approved with the preliminary plat. Sketch Plan (A)transitions from 62 foot wide lots on the east side of the development(adjacent to the existing single-family homes)to 50 foot wide lots in the center of the development to row townhomes on the west side of the development. The total unit breakdown in this sketch plan is: • 62 foot wide single-family lots: 34 • 50 foot wide single-family lots: 74 • Row townhome units: 88 • Total proposed homes in sketch plan (A): 196 This would yield a net density of 4.43 dwelling units per acre. Alternate Sketch Plan(e) Sketch Plan (B) is similar to Alternate Sketch Plan (A)with the exception that the western side would consist of 40 foot wide lots instead of row townhome units. The total unit breakdown in this sketch plan is: • 62 foot wide single-family lots: 34 • 50 foot wide single-family lots: 74 • 40 foot wide signle0family lots: 62 • Total proposed lots: 170 This would yield a net density of 3.84 dwelling units per acre. The changes as shown in both sketch plans are substantial enough to where they would warrant a new preliminary plat be submitted and approved. A public hearing would also be required to be held. Both sketch plans significantly increase the number of lots/units from the approved preliminary plat(62 additional lots/units in Alternative Sketch Plan (A), and 36 additional lots in Alternative Sketch Plan (B)). Similar to the original approved preliminary plat, both would have to be approved as a Planned Unit Development. Sketch Plan (A)would also require the portion of the development consisting of the row townhomes to go through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning to allow for the townhome units as the property is currently zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) and townhome units are neither a permitted or conditional use in that zoning district. Planning Commission The Planning Commission had this same discussion with the developer at its regular meeting on November 9, 2022. Generally, the Planning Commission was not in favor of increasing the density of this development based on feedback from the public hearing on the preliminary plat. I have included the minutes from that meeting for your review and information. BUDGET IMPACT NA ACTION REQUESTED No formal action is required. Discuss the attached alternative sketch plans with the developer and provide any feedback that the Council deems necessary and/or appropriate. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material Approved Preliminary Plat D Backup Material Alternate Sketch Plan A D Backup Material Alternate Sketch Plan B Backup Material Econ - Market Status D Backup Material November 9, 2022 Planning Commission Minutes e 1 OII de Hours before digging, \ —1------------------------- ----------L------------ 811 or ca11811.com \ Ir PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: °m 190TH STREET W u I4 .-1B,iR0YHILL MD ADDITION,G—LB County.Mlaresom AND 1 >e • x • a" • n I r-4—,r1'— TTI, Ouana of Section 23.TownsM1ip lldR ge 2p, OUTLOT A —� 1 -- r—"i j I I o mr, ma v`,mgeAxl tlrofth.ZVI agdam6eeim= TYPICAL 62'SINGLE FAMILY 5��4 3 2� 1� f r i� ^`N a`^`;9 a't6 5laem,aael rori,ar"f:sa uoass—a—e a,eece \ I j r i a �e I• �7 6 I Ir I eu tides 6di=" eo46ei 1m.^oo�t , r4 eis e3diBw 5"n 11 1 r_________ �'•' \3A'^ I I I ]mins BB nutex,s t f 11-11 111 Bouin D°e�rCeS I Q I SIT- 39 a distance of 114.111-1IM1�,ce Soum 22 eteM1g1reo 30 minutes ssa�sx d:Wextatlizlanceof 13]54 f76,57 p �1 1 —er v z� v�L � —R_ a�rees l2 minus m"s«�ndsWataaistaere"fs]G.s]fea: I. I I I \ 1\,I I�11 1- a 3r 6` — J� tf,erue Sou Ah90eesd d NOMZ Waw adsmrce of 81152 I ,uce fixe a linef saiRM�.ez�l puerNrand swtl line mere 21 zmf Sr I rt,.•Malre -- I -- SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA r X11 1- \ ear 17 18 I I 1 `src ss.ucr I 1 1/`' I'I 1 1: L/ D W II•a^ mn L PROTPOSED20NING _ �L — rT— _J 1 ?A Z v 1, a ,I i ? G905NSo GTE Af�A. 110 AC I I Brum �=3 L_, f 1 a oEuNREARmgw "DST W B cR 1 L r+I �I L NRRIDOR INET WED: 93 AC �'1 3 r 3 NEf9TEARFA. WN(NET BIGRWO 467 0„IITL.SLu[x, _ �.wwtlxrawnr ——— MDD OF GDDR N•xrexn. LL-_ n a •I ' 14 'PTT rr— 4 I 4 °�U'°Y E"NG°LE TYHDME: DMES a aa” —OP oSPACE18.15 AC 1 meBwa\ •\x,\' 1 rr ��^ x1 1 �— j •• SEE WOLT TABLE BELOW IIS— a' 5 I --- RiEaD y GR 4 NET OSSDENSITY '. 9BB UN A< J i PD tAc 6 1z r a � LOT STANDARDS SITE LEGEND 0.-2 ANGLE EXISTING PROPOSED a 1 ,:a p. I 7 —D— _— —PERILING Y a • I ILL._ f, e4 o LINE mare _ r 3� i ��II B d // ._ -------- EASEMENTUNE 17 I �' II I 1 1 y °' 1 NRB AND WneR 1 •1,�- I I^10 1 I �9'•� ,z8^ I en nP°LIT NRB AND GUTreR ND aB \ w,ow w.x_s_x x...a,.^... ...— RETA NwG watPONDMORMAwATER IEVEL 1\ �^ sueeoxxm,w 1 I \ nn ARrzawsxoeos f—STREET 4 OUTLOT TABLE 41 P Lo ° IMMERSRIP EMFAPARK 20'TWLOORRIDOR 0 BLEUPIANDS -T..., PONpING NFIODOWAY I L 1p T 4o^ p 1z a 3 I LL.. A39d a al 13 DEVELOPMENT NOTES / I rf i mrx I. 14 ; ,m1 X d y I L y a ——— ,. ALL LOT DIMENNONSARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT. bJTEOT A! a2 EI i; 5• 8� ;. I ' `4 3. ALLMNAMREROUNDm TDTHENEa TSOMUMOT. m, ES PRE SUBIECT M APPROVAL BY THEO,Y. 44 4. DRAINAGE AND LITILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE MMDM AS REWIRED 5 STREET WIOTH . r n.7i y 5 I a elm, SARESHOWUFROMFACEOFNRBTOFACEOFNRB. ; J0 b• R I 1 I r mxo I + '6"4 s /— `T 3 I I o 0 / NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION a ., iB n . � 04/1622 ,■ _.�_J ER' PREPARED FOR: 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUMMERGATE DEVELOPMENT INC. MEADOVOI/IEW PRESERVE «w `„ "" A 'LAKE\4LLE Mu sOE AR Ssoaear rz:O6 1 2 ucsusL uo 26971 FARMINGTON,MN r"�A"�"`�"�` �+ PROJECT NUMBER:0033754.00 DATE: 06/01/22 3Ai1353Nd M3IAMOOV3W EA N aE off. a w N o Ox a V 0 Q J Z p � G Z � o Q a Z_ J W of d E� 3 f 8�8 E8� 4A V I I _ a z {4 JJ z 1 I I' I p LL JnCP IIrvP'I� pN 6 �—� LJ —Il1 I I g I J ��_ t�_� "JL.JL JL JL JL JL JL.JL.��J L--- I —all^— J J ry ter- - '�r 21 r- F.]H I LLZ.- �'a L,c LI^� maP m_ oaA �Y �� 1/.af@ ,�," llr_°i�IIr4�-`\ `A�`•�``� g __ _ o _ I p� JL JL.rJL --'. r a �W'aaa!ue5 Rua!s»�ay poawsaM EEOZ 3 �'AO EOtltltJYSG£Ero\Wf13NTlWFYJMNro'K[FEIXIVN A J'11 PLIM i I *. •'; ., i �k 50'Roadway Esmt Fulure�� _.[.tenslo� sovuiv - u RowTH f o ^ 42 un. 3 Nl�� �FgFgF VIM IIS r _ ' 1 rEverglade Path 0-0 t ,tlow. 1' 006 ore iro3. / proposed [MAN,T` 1, TraN-- ql®� )I PAflK � n Ilk 10 r Y �, ttt�iii�����J� u ••� one r p 0-1 no- ,Av 7' law f a EXCEPTION fJ Principal Connector 1 HOZ!{i - .1}°" ! 11��9 ' Greenway Corridor � •- ., � i ri v (100'.w) kr S' proposed f ' e `v T< Lt Trail f r r MIN, f Wetland ��(� ■■�■ �, A. \ RowTH ��!1 46 un 1 — r ..,t _-Entry Monument — P JECTDARY � I r A ' r •: � 1.... '' v-t*:. ..a Road ray Esmt .Evtenslon '-• "' j160TH$T!Wa' - 0 ,j Flll .,p 1. i aGl t , Everglade t+l' Path II i MCA'.' I l 1 ' M l .' • , _Proposed ��� �. •• PARK ° ` H��+s -�' 1 t .L � - �tllti..I• 11,., W : �'r 193fast��, • � F�1twwrl _ 11 N', , EXCEPTIO , P ��,` fit• ' ' Princi al Connector Greenway Corridor { / Proposed Trail i�•% I , LNt����9L , f7' /' 1Yelland �. �eRnor, R - .�_—� TSI undsrRauttchopl.._,�. _3.19_^a9 - _ Rf ument t n RI9ht out` r , h �. ¢O DARY Q � � i - �^ a 7- 1 o i � . L o O 00 ct' O (`7 O 69- N t09- (`7 O�1 (`7 ,. , c- O O E U Q o E U o L U C-0- U O CD 0 sz O � 6R 'o U � IN O � O O 11 CITY OF FARMINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING November 9, 2022 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair Rotty at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Rotty,Lehto,McAbee,Windschitl,Tesky Members Absent: None Staff Present: Tony Wippler,Planning Manager 2. APPROVAL OFMINUTES a)Approve Planning Commission Minutes MOTION by Windschitl,second by McAbee to approve the Regular Meeting minutes of the Planning Commission from October 11,2022.APIF,MOTION CARRIED. 3. DISCUSSION a) Summergate-Meadowview Preserve Update Planning Manager Wippler introduced this item. Casey Wollschlager and Bryan Tucker were in attendance representing Summergate Development,LLC. A preliminary plat was approved by the City Council for the Meadowview Preserve development on June 27,2022. The preliminary plat consisted of 134 single-family lots on 61.07 acres for a net density of 3.03 dwelling units per acre. The developer earlier this year withdrew an application for final plat of the initial phase of the development as market conditions were beginning to shift forcing them to re-evaluate the unit make-up of the development. Two alternative development sketches (labeled A and B)were provided by the developer for the Meadowview Preserve site. Sketch Plan (A)utilizes the same road configuration of the approved preliminary plat. This concept transitions from 62-foot-wide lots on the east side of the development to 50-foot-wide lots in the center of the development to row townhomes on the west side of the development and includes a total of 196 lots/units. Sketch Plan(B) is similar to Sketch Plan (A)with the exception that the western side of the development would consist of 40-foot-wide lots instead of row townhome units. Sketch Plan(B) shows a total of 170 lots. Planning Manager Wippler stated that the changes proposed in either sketch plan would be substantial enough to warrant that a new preliminary plat be submitted and approved. A public hearing would also be required to be held. Both sketch plans would have to be approved as part of the Planned Unit Development. Additionally,Sketch Plan(A)would require the portion of the development consisting of the row townhomes to go through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning to allow for the townhome units as the property is currently zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential)and townhome units are neither a permitted or conditional use in that zoning district. No formal action is required by the Planning Commission for this discussion item. Staff is requesting that the Planning Commission provide comment and direction to the developer and staff. Planning Commission Minutes November 9,2022 Page 2 Casey Wollschlager with Summergate Development mentioned that they have seen a change in the market and interest rates. They have been working with various builders on different ideas on how to take a project and still keep the core elements that were approved and build a development that works in the current market conditions. Mr.Wollschlager mentioned that it is less likely that they would be interested in the townhome concept as the townhome market has dropped dramatically recently. They are more interested in the 40-45-foot-wide lots. The goal for these new concepts is an attempt to get a variety of products to make the homes somewhat affordable. Chair Rotty inquired if the developer had any concerns with the different densities and values of homes in close proximity. Mr.Wollschlager stated that development trends are starting to lean that way and that the way homes are being built with various treatments on front elevations he believes that it doesn't truly hurt value. Chair Rotty inquired about Summergate's other developments and whether this is something they are looking to do with those other developments. Mr.Wollschlager did mention this is something they are considering for other developments of theirs as well, Farmington is the first city that they have approached with the idea though. Bryan Tucker,Summergate Development,mentioned that it is not just a price point issue but that builders are looking to diversify the housing types within the development because it lowers their risk and allows more flexibility to have different uses to sell. Commissioner Tesky has concerns with the concepts and the additional homes planned as there was a lot of representation from the community at the public hearing for the preliminary plat expressing safety concerns regarding traffic in the area and increasing the number of homes would only increase that concern. Commissioner Windschitl has the same concerns that Commissioner Tesky identified. Commissioner Windschitl asked about the type of townhome units that could be included. Mr.Wollschlager stated they would be four to six unit attached townhomes,likely slab on grade with a two-car attached garage and have a price point in the$300,000 to$350,000 range. Commissioner Windschitl did inquire if this would have an HOA. Mr.Wollschlager stated that the development could potentially have a master HOA due to the amount of natural area and potential for entrance monument sign. Mr.Wollschlager did mention that if they do move forward with changing the preliminary plat,they would have to do an updated traffic study to determine what improvements to the roadways would be necessary. Commissioner Lehto agreed with the other commission members regarding traffic concerns due to the increased density. Commissioner Lehto mentioned that she thought$600,000 price point for a home on a 62-foot-wide lot seems high for the market to bear. Mr. Wollschlager explained there is a little bit of a disconnect on lot sizes,it is really about the building pad not the width of the lot. Generally speaking,the building pad on a 62-foot- wide lot is the same as 75-foot-wide lot so the houses are generally the same size. Commissioner Lehto asked if there is any thoughts about cutting back on some of the 62 - foot wide lots and reducing the lots in the development. Mr.Wollschlager explained that reducing the lots just increases the overall costs of lots in the development,that is why they are looking to increase the density to try to make the units more affordable. Planning Commission Minutes November 9,2022 Page 3 Commissioner McAbee inquired about the townhome units and asked if the developer was looking to not go that route. Mr.Wollschlager said likely not due to the townhome market falling off dramatically in large part to interest rates making them unaffordable. Commissioner McAbee agrees with the other Commission members about the concern of increasing the density in this area and the impacts it would have on the traffic in the area. Chair Rotty appreciated that the developer came to the Planning Commission for this discussion in advance of bringing a new Preliminary Plat. Chair Rotty agrees with the other Commission members and the concerns that were expressed by the residents at the public hearing were clear. He is not really excited to go back to those residents and say the rules are changing because of the economy. We want to help the developers but we also have to look out for the residents. Chair Rotty is hesitant to have the developer bring in a new preliminary plat. Mr.Wollschlager indicated that he understood the comments provided by the Planning Commission. 4. ADJOURN MOTION by Tesky,second by Lehto to adjourn at 7:35 p.m.APIF,MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, 16'.A7 alir6-4- Tony Wippler Planning Manager Builder : DR Horton Lot Size : 50ft wide TE Location : Rosemount House Size : 40ft wide SUMME RG Project : Caramore Crossing Size : 1,800 Slab 2,800 Full Basement Price : $450,000 - $500,000 0 Nt .g �7. �. •1ti'f`' Builder : DR Horton Lot Size : 52-60ft wide SUMMERGATE Location : Farmington House Size : 40-45ft wide Project : Whispering Fields Size : 1,500 — 2,100 Price : $425,000 - $485,000 'ii Builder : . • • • • 40ft wide CS"�UM M E R AT E Location : Cottage Grove House Size : 30ft wide Project Settlers Bluff Size : 1 : 112,200 ' $380,000 $440,000 ti MEMO Boom soon NONE 11 NINE' googol r r7r . .�Y/il�■II 11111 .,,.0 J� J.� .��: +IF' : . L Jrf�1111 �� ❑�j�lir. ' 'q1C a f f i�f "'1 s *• 1011111111111111111111111111111 IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII 1111 IIII Builder : M/1 Homes Lot Size : 40-50ft wide <S7UMMERGATE Location : Rosemount House Size : 30-40ft wide Project : Amber Fields Size : 1,700 — 3,200 Price : $460,000 - $580,000 I i B11 ill — ... all' ■�■ill � r Wr E swr- CITY OF O 430 Third St., Farmington, MN 55024 FARMINGTON © 651-28o-6800 OFarmingtonMN.gov TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Deanna Kuennen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Ebert Downtown Apartment- Project Update and Overview (45 Minutes) DATE: February 6, 2023 INTRODUCTION The proposed Ebert Downtown Apartment project continues to move forward with multiple different components of the project being processed simultaneously. Staff will provide an overview and update on the project as a whole to ensure that City Council has a full understanding of the project and how the various elements of the project relate. DISCUSSION Beginning in 2022, Staff started working with Ebert Construction on a possible downtown market-rate apartment project located at 310 3rd Street. I n November, a joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting was held to talk through the proposed project on a conceptual level. Since then, a public open house was held, more detailed engineered plans have been prepared, applications for various approvals have been submitted, and the public financing(Tax I ncrement Financing) process has begun. To ensure that City Council has a thorough understanding of all of the components of the project-Staff will walk through the project details including: 1. Updated project design and parking layout. The purpose of this discussion will be to understand the parking arrangements required for the project and its potential impact on public parking. 2. Replacement parking and estimated costs. The discussions surrounding the Ebert Downtown Apartments have included identifying and constructing replacement parking on city-owned land. 3. Required Planning Commission and City Council approvals. The City Council and Planning Commission have different roles as part of the development review and approval process. Staff will provide an overview of which body will have approval authority for the different applications, why the "city"will be required to be a co-applicant on planning and zoning applications,and the steps and agreements that will be required to implement the actions of the Planning Commission and City Council. 4. Overall project timeline. This will include timing of the required actions and also an update on the proposed construction schedule. The most recent architectural and site plans are attached to help facilitate the discussion. An overall downtown parking map is also included to highlight the Walnut Street parking location identified for replacement parking. ACTION REQUESTED No action requested at this time.This overview is being provided for informational purposes only. ATTACHMENTS: Type Description D Backup Material Ebert Apt-Architectural Plans D Backup Material Ebert Apt. - Preliminary Site Plans D Backup Material Downtown Parking Map -------------------------- ------------------------------------ Cal 1 a a YIWW.collageamhitectsxcooimi ------------------------------- FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN FARMINGTON DOWNTOWN -—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—-- lilik i I R—.1-0 UY MTEHAT �UN��AR MY--- AND ATIA —E—DAR— UMM —E .1 ..NE.— 'y L--j Pp cay�ilvcnnwc MN%313 CITY SUBMITTAL ITITI T FLOOR PLANS FLOOR LEVEL 1 &SITE PLAN A1.0 0 0NEW © . .. USM © HIRE 111111■ ■■ ■■ oil ■■ 11111111 ■ ii u ® !l!i 1111 ■It IIIIIUA�IN ■� IIl ulll161110 I� I II ® iii ■ ME ��Irii"iiwiiii i� ■■ iIII�III� ii 1fihm ii IIII�IIIl ■ ■ �� �� � � ��� ■ �� 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 ■i ■ � i� i �u v MEN No 1 :1 luu amain All sollin 11.11■■■ ■r.�.■ ■AAAr..■■r.A■■■■■Ar ��11111111 11 111 11 11111!! 11111!! 1111111111111111 I&IL alll Iaa a1F. fill �■ �� { •�� �� 111 �� �i �� ii �� i■ �� ii ii 1111 - . .. . 1111 1111 1111 1111 ■■ ■■ 01111-111 �■ HIT (limlic ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ IN IN Noll 1111 1111 # 1111 ■ ���� oriuola �� ua:oalr �� oaniml ■■ an 1111 ■■ �■I I �I 1111 ,®1 L ■ ■ 1111 on on on ■■ on 1111 so ■t on ■■ 1111 11 1111 ■ ■ 1111 IIIIIIIAIIItlill 1111 IIIIIIoIIImIIII IIIOIIulllllll@ 1■ 1IN IIUIIIIIIIIAIII ul-01111llllulll 1111111 1MEF1111111 11 ■ on on NONE on 1111aim■_ 11 no on ■ ii, ■ ■ 1111 A u lul ■I■ 11191uIIIMAI u1-111l llplll O■ 1111 ®111111111 0 wi MM oolm ■■■ ■ ■ 1111 ■� 1111 1111 ■� 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 ■ ��� ■ 1111 iMAwt'; �� I1 11 , R lllilf �■ �� �NA91111� small Au 1Rtl �� Blom ■ 1 1 N o ��e .I.- v v ® J �® I■■I �■ „ ■■ ■ _ •, ■■ IIIIIIIIIIIIBIIIIti Illlllllli'.Illtll ■■ IIIIiIIIIJIi ■ SOUTH .. gIIIIIIIIIIR111B IIIIIIIIIiflll'III ■■ IIII'I!!!� ■ COURTYARD ■ ■'I ■� ■ Ijjq_. ■■ :Iilalll• ?:1.111 �■ ■ II I IIFARMINGTON DOWNTOWN EMR ■ ■■ ■, ■ '- "."_ IIIIIiII ■■ III•IIII•. 111.1111. ■. ■ II I I� ,. ■■ ■1 ■ _ 1■ :■ : ..,�1 � ■■ ■ I� III --A-Y-DAR- WEST :: :• COURTYARD . - -. ol CITY SUBMITTAL .. .. .. .. .. .. L!!ill!I�IIdN, Nllgl�l!6I 11mM ' , _ WrSTELEVATION ELEVATIONS xM O z h �e sE L $ iW=W w e w i � � k "7 oe&S S <eeeeeeeeeee c S u e V m W Y fes- 7 •fid ¢ Z W A (n W 11 El HE C Q 8 n « z xa gd8`d J ti W Qaw � W Qaua d T C) a >o ? RRhR $ b�' S m'o oQ �z- ti W 2222 g v f. a z V7 a4aC ooW� �} I 2 id<o<2q G3�: 0. ]p �I k J CS da W'ae��5; a� I IIj z ZO �Z cl za�nngm.m n��m� hQ Z Z C'1 009 M 0 A- Z m LL 1 ¢ 3 �� '' k�a 133a1s aas 1 SK SnMJ - 6�Q€Q� r" w� _ $• G J, 3 1S (7, Ri R s, 1 "q'! fn 2 3� ' U WE' "ate� o„ a _' Z E) 8 �CC � :. -' R _�< �:$:- m.•m�w,.,."-' �,`Fz:m`"-"'fir., ,.. 8 � , °E QVO&7/ba 3gg7 SOS i g4 CA N a� z g w a 2 O INS, ���$ Ea„ � g aoa ¢ , < N as a Q m ao g'xa' € 9 Eb°gaaa m&S> }xES� YEEY�e Y E z.. a S?p„ R@:3t�`<y't m Hit- K O �p - s"W2a�PYWnc�YmaE�;�eYeY`eY` €��€Nip.'. aYa 4Ya 2 <F6' :��n� o✓ ",�r�_ �:<fz=° E'a W KEto = oz4Wuw w»a -Y---Y--.Y ^ w2 Q' W �eeoe""oeoo e e e e o $ b<<„ PH!''a: n�uoEeE eE E >x� :Ah W � a�aQ•6E= d g d'='Wb e ❑ ❑ F€ �. Naag3aFza O �z 0 a pyo 'a C)pz e ee9 Nip yy F'w LL m J LE fir 85� Z LL — — — — — — —w A E- ' s a <as 133813 abs 11104 3 w Z �ONZ v) 8 ag LU eta Q / i ObOt/7/yt/ gN/7 OOS I I I I a Y I I N _} _. _ — — _ _-_ _ _ _ — _ J L _ I w. 1 i i . SCALE,-.2D C.S.A.H.NO.50 i ELM STREET � I g I IEGEes E.rsful9 Cmfpur I a.p pr R1a u.mr[asr. -- ._•.- .Wenofe,Errrskn9 spar E/ewfwn ' rout..uw Fr-sm.R1 EXn [roar E�wfwn ' �. puC� � offs Prvpasee C f /.✓- � r I Me et I mu.waw [XrsF Yr' vuur arRW-, ^°T[cr ' "—"-- �Omofn Proppse0 spot E/ewfwn(Gutter of CurEf vert, ."" cpr'Kpx`e[r en DrerPpy. ' c ter ' .:: .. � ✓: eel Moana. r m+mX veeeera AXW'n[.rF e,flet Ma Peeesra ww rr Yaw"W p<✓ " pfe, Empr.,BY VrWp,eO GpfaA Bp„n C : pmaf„smrfwr seer u„ ......... empu,rw ar cr re a umer I _ b 0-X. rwe BI­ Lu Lu Go Lul s gypp: PRIOR TO ANY EXCAYATON THE CONTRACTOR SHALL Y\ 2.• I j VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CALL AB HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: N E y TWIWIN ISTATE ONE CITY AREA 651-X54-0002 MN TOLL FREE 1-600-252 1166 �_ __ I THE LOCA NOTE THE APPROXIMATE TIONS OF EWSTING Y, THE C ND UnunEs ARE SHOWN Ji IN AN NETHEEXA WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTION SHALL �s W x s BEFORE OREIC THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL ES TOEXISTINGFULLY L RESPONSIBLEMFOR ANY RAENCING ND ALL DAMAGESTWHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTUTES. w e I L——------A,---------J I FMX,F I I I I �6v7 Rre FARMINGTON DOWNTOWN EELI�MINARY GRADING PLAN ` CMEO 16�I m TTo Fr�W�:2' EBERT CONSTRUCTION 22-0451 PEo "`W'ss FARMINGTON,MN ISHEETNO. 3 OF 4 SHEETS 1-1E23 � a w z y Qa v ?a V O wo a g (L g 2 e ; Z O �—z Z0z 3,-)2 oyo ooz— U f Z W LL ..__ _._. .... - W of Q 6 JS S cl o ' o r€ o § a �Lu O r 133b1S KZ 3 ONS, wv gI sc i I t 8� I � o Obpb7/bb -9Nl7 OOS r I I a� Downtown Public Parking Location Number of Spaces Color Key 2nd St. parking lot43 p - •i,uitt - , ' 306" 3 d St. between Elm 44 -6El �. St. &Oak St. 3rd St. between Oak 40 ❑ St. &Spruce St. Oak St. between 3'd 33 M � St. &41"St. Oak St. between 24 2nd St. &3rd St. « Rambling River 52 �' � ® �.= -' Center parkinq lot ` • �. •A St Oak City Hall parking 64 y j Lot w/S ruce St, .. 1q • Total:300 • ,. Potential parking reduction due to .,r. 4 proposed redevelopment c: _ r A Future public parking at 2nd St. &Walnut St. -- ---- Spaces TBD i CITE OF FARMING