HomeMy WebLinkAbout03.08.23 Parks and Rec Packet
Meeng Locaon:
Farmington C ity H all
430 T hird Street
Farmington, M N 55024
PA R K S A ND R E C R E AT I O N R E G U L A R M E E T I N G A G E N DA
M arch 8, 2023
7:00 PM
1.C all M eeng to O rder
2.A pprove M eeng A genda
3.A pprove M eeng M inutes
(a)A pprove February 8, 2023 Meeng M inutes
4.P resentaons
(a)P ublic C omments
(b)Parks and Recreaon D epartment 2022 A nnual Report
5.B usiness I tems
(a)Parks and Facilies Tour with Rambling River C enter A dvis ory Board and City Council
6.D iscussion I tems
(a)Fall Food Truck Event with Empire Parks and Recreaon C ommis s ion
(b)Bike Pedes trian P lan P riories
(c)Review 2023 Work P lan P rogress
7.C ommission Roundtable
(a)Round Table Format
8.S taff Report/Updates
(a)I nformaonal Updates
9.M eeng A genda Topics
(a)Pos s ible I tems for A pril 12, 2023 M eeng A genda
10.A djournment
"The F armington Parks and Recreaon A dvisory C ommission's mission is to advise and make
recommendaons to the F armington C ity C ouncil concerning the comprehensive planning of the C ity
parks, trails, open space, recreaon facilies and recreaon programs."
TO :Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers
F R O M :Kellee O mlid, Parks and Recreaon D irector
S U B J EC T:A pprove February 8, 2023 Meeng M inutes
DATE:March 8, 2023
B A C KG R O U N D
A%ached are the dra& minutes from the parks and recreaon commis s ion’s February 8, 2023 meeng.
Commission members are as ked to review the minutes and provide any correcons or addions that are
needed at the meeng.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material Draft February 8, 2023 Meeting Minutes
Farmington Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes from the February 8, 2023 Regular Meeting
Members Present: Katharine Caron, Ashley Crabtree, Megan Merricks, Katie Putt, and David McMillen
Members Absent:
Other’s Present: Parks and Recreation Director Kellee Omlid
I. Call Meeting to Order
Chair Caron called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Quorum was present.
II. Introduction of New Parks and Recreation Commission Member
Megan Merricks introduced herself to the commission. Commission members introduced themselves
and welcomed Megan to the parks and recreation commission.
III. Approval of February 8, 2023 Meeting Agenda
Moved by Crabtree and seconded by Putt to approve the meeting agenda. All persons in favor (APIF).
Motion carried.
IV. Approval of January 11, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes
Moved by McMillen and seconded by Crabtree to approve the meeting minutes with no revisions. APIF.
Motion carried.
V. Presentations
A. Public Comments
There were no public comments shared at the meeting.
VI. Business Items
A. Chair and Vice-Chair Elections
Chair Caron asked for nominations for the chair position. Crabtree nominated Putt for the chair
position and seconded by McMillen. APIF. Motion carried.
Newly elected Chair Putt asked for nominations for the vice-chair position. Caron nominated
McMillen for vice-chair and seconded by Putt. APIF. Motion carried.
B. Park Dedication Study
Director Omlid provided an overview of park dedication and park development fees. The city
has an ordinance that pertains to dedicating lands for parks, trails, and open space. This
ordinance was last amended in its entirety in 2003. Several text amendments were made to the
ordinance in 2005 and 2007. Since there has been confusion with certain aspects and language
in the ordinance and it hasn’t been fully reviewed in 20 years, staff reached out to HKGi to
complete a park dedication study for the city. The study includes two joint work sessions with
the planning commission and city council.
Moved by Caron and seconded by Crabtree to approve the park dedication study and
recommend city council approve a contract with HKGi to complete a park dedication study for
the city. APIF. Motion carried.
C. Rambling River Park Master Plan Proposal Draft
Director Omlid provided an overview of the joint work session with parks and recreation
commission and city council where consensus was to focus on Rambling River Park and the
trails. Staff met with Dakota County staff to see what their interest and involvement would be
in the process to update the master plan for Rambling River Park. Staff then met with HKGi to
discuss scope and process to update the master plan. The proposal was included in the meeting
packet. Commission members recommended more community input and earlier in the process.
Commission asked if the improvements would be funded through referendum or bonds. At this
point, the funding source hasn’t been identified. Adding pickleball courts and a skateboard park
to the park system are priorities for the commission.
Moved by McMillen and seconded by Crabtree to recommend city council approve updating the
master plan for Rambling River Park. APIF. Motion carried.
VII. Discussion Items
A. Review Open Meeting Law
The commission reviewed the open meeting law information from the League of Minnesota
Cities (LMC). Director Omlid reviewed the reasons why meetings of public bodies must
generally be open to the public and the responsibilities of commission members regarding
the open meeting law. Director Omlid stated the best course of action is to discuss city
business at the meetings and call staff with questions and/or if you need more information.
B. Review Parks and Recreation Commission Bylaws
The commission reviewed the parks and recreation commission bylaws. Commissioners
Crabtree and McMillen were on the commission in 2020 when the bylaws were created and
approved by both the parks and recreation commission and city council. They were
developed to hold members accountable as a few members wouldn’t show up for meetings
leaving the commission without a quorum. There weren’t rules in place to dismiss a
commissioner due to missing multiple meetings. The bylaws will be reviewed annually in
February as new members start their term in February.
Merricks won’t be at the March meeting as she has a work trip.
C. Review 2023 Work Plan Progress
Chair Putt reviewed the progress of the goals and objectives of the 2023 work plan.
VIII. Commission Roundtable
Crabtree: Didn’t have anything to share.
Caron: Didn’t have anything to share.
Putt: Didn’t have anything to share.
McMillen: Asked about plowing the trail on the east side of Pilot Knob Road. Director Omlid said parks
maintenance staff plows the trail on the west side of Pilot Knob Road from 197th St. W. to 180th St. W.
McMillen asked about the status of the grant the Rambling River Center received. Director Omlid said
staff is waiting for an email from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with next
steps.
Merricks: Didn’t have anything to share.
A question was asked about the status of the passenger van for the Rambling River Center. Director
Omlid stated all the funds for the van have been raised, but don’t have a date for build and delivery.
There was discussion on the fall food truck event and the date for homecoming. Director Omlid will
follow-up with the athletic director from Farmington High School.
IX. Staff Report/Updates
Director Omlid provided information on the following:
A. Outdoor Rinks and Warming Houses
The outdoor rinks and warming houses have been going well. There have been a few days
closed due to weather. Seasonal staff is scheduled through February 20, which is President’s
Day. If the ice is good and weather cooperates, staff would look to extend the warming houses
being opened as opened later in December 2022 than planned.
B. North Creek Greenway Trail Project
Final design of the trail is nearly complete. The goal is authorization and advertisement of the
project in February, award the project in March, and construction starting in May through 2024.
C. Farmington Currents Spring Edition
Copies of the spring edition of the Farmington Currents were delivered to city hall today and
should be in homes by February 13.
D. 30% Design for Trails on Pilot Knob Road
Staff is waiting for proposals from two engineering firms on 30% design plans for the trail gap on
the west side of Pilot Knob Road and new trail on the east side of Pilot Knob Road from CSAH 50
to 195th St. This will be a city led project with support from Dakota County.
E. Youth Sports Plus at Schmitz-Maki Arena
Staff learned about a Coaching Video Service the Farmington High School Varsity Coaches were
interested in having installed at the Schmitz-Maki Arena. Youth Sports Plus installed a mobile
hot spot and camera at the Arena to offer the Coaching Video Service. Youth Sports Plus also
offers live streaming services for games and practices. However, live streaming services weren’t
included as the only fiber running into the Arena is the city’s and access can’t be provided to a
3rd party vendor to use the internet services on those lines. The mobile hot spot works well for
high school and youth games for analysis, but fiber works best for the live streams.
X. Meeting Agenda Topics
The following items were tentatively identified by the commission for its March 8, 2023 meeting
agenda:
1.
XI. Adjournment
Moved by Caron and seconded by McMillen to adjourn the meeting. APIF. Motion carried. The meeting
was adjourned at 8:28 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Kellee Omlid
Parks & Recreation Director and Recording Secretary
TO :Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers
F R O M :Kellee O mlid, Parks and Recreaon D irector
S U B J EC T:P ublic C omments
DATE:March 8, 2023
B A C KG R O U N D
This agenda item allows the public to s peak to commission members about any item that is not on the
agenda. W hen s peaking to the commission it mus t be in a res pec'ul and non-threatening manner.
A nyone w is hing to provide public comments mus t provide their name and addres s for the record. P ublic
comments shall not exceed five minutes.
The commission will not respond to the comments and a formal w ri.en res pons e will be s ent prior to the
next commission meeng to the person who made the public comments . U nder no circums tances w ill
any formal acon be taken on the public comments that are provided to the commis s ion.
TO :Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers
F R O M :Kellee O mlid, Parks and Recreaon D irector
S U B J EC T:Parks and Recreaon D epartment 2022 A nnual Report
DATE:March 8, 2023
B A C KG R O U N D
Each year, the Parks and Recreaon D epartment (D epartment) creates an annual report about the
follow ing:
P rograms and events offered
Parks, trails , and facilies projects completed
Maintenance work performed in parks, on trails , and in facilies
D epartment s taff have created an annual report for 2022, which is the 20th consecuve year the
D epartment has provided an annual report.
Parks and Facilies S upervisor Jeremy P ire, Recreaon S upervis or M is s ie Kohlbeck, and Recreaon
S upervisor Emilee S hearer w ill be in a0endance to help pres ent the annual report. Commission members
are as ked to listen to the 2022 annual report and are encouraged to as k ques ons during and a2er the
pres entaon.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material 2022 Annual Report
FARMINGTON PARKS AND RECREATION
ANNUAL REPORT 2022
CELEBRATE MILESTONE & WELCOME NEW STAFF
New Hires: Austin Holm, Emilee Shearer, and John CarpenterDan Thielbar 1984-PRESENT
John CarpenterParks Maintenance
John joined the parks maintenance team in November.
He worked as a seasonal staff member for the cities
of Cottage Grove and Apple Valley prior to joining the
city. He is looking forward to driving machinery he has
not had a chance to use, as well as, working to provide
the best park experience to residents of Farmington.
In his spare time, John enjoys deer hunting, fishing, ice
fishing, playing guitar, bowling, and trapping.
Emilee Shearer Recreation Supervisor
Emilee started as the Recreation Supervisor in August.
For nine years, Emilee worked for the Farmington Parks
and Recreation Department as a Receation Assistant/
Program Supervisor. She grew up in Farmington
and will be soon finishing her doctorate degree in
Communication Studies. In her new position, she looks
forward to putting her own twist on the city's recreation
programs. In her free time, she likes to spend time with
her boyfriend, family, and friends, as well as cooking,
reading, and watching football and hockey.
Austin Holm, Parks Maintenance
Austin started working for the parks and recreation department in June as a parks
maintenance worker. Previously he worked seasonally for the City of Eagan for
the last four years while in college. He is looking forward to learning new things
in his new position, and seeing the city's progress throughout his career. Austin
grew up in Eagan and currently lives there. Outside of work, he likes to hunt, farm,
and enjoys anything with an engine. Make sure to say hi to Austin when you see
him out and about!
Dan Thielbar, Parks Maintenance
Dan has worked for Farmington Parks and Recreation since 1984. He worked seasonally for a few years and recently completed 35 years of full-time employment.
Dan's favorite aspects of the job include field maintenance, making ice and generally working outside. He also enjoyed building trout beds with the Dakota County
Sportsman's Club. He attended Turf School, taken the Shade Tree Course, and Playground Safety Inspection Class. Fun fact: at Turf School, Dan got to be one of
the first people at Target Field. He walked the warning track, toured the management suites and learned how they collect rainwater to water the field. Dan enjoys
fishing, hunting and watching wildlife in his free time.
Adopt a Parks Partners
Dokken Family
Elizabeth Koss and Dave Seipp
Empire Rockets 4H Club
Farmington Ambassador Program
Farmington Barber
Farmington Boys Basketball
Farmington Girl Scouts
Farmington Sno-Tigers
Farmington Tiger Dance Team
FHS Outdoors Club
FHS Side Line Cheerleading
Finch and Daisy
Great Oaks Academy
Kim Landerville
Lovely Woods
The Lien Family
Middle Creek East HOA
Porter Family
Program Partners
Bethel’s Rock Church
Community Education
Dakota Electric
Dakota County Sportsman’s Club
Dakota County STS
Edina Realty- Mike Heinzerling
Farmington Liquors
Farmington Youth Hockey Association
Farmington Youth Lacrosse
Grant Heating and Air
Hedlund Irrigation
Heritage Figure Skating Club
Impact Auto Repair
Lakeville Orthodontics
Meadowview Orthodontics
Nivala Team
Northfield Hospital and Clinics
Pam McCarthy Agency Inc.
Pellicci Hardware
Randy Fulsaas
SOL - I.S. Solutions
State Farm Insurance
Transition Reality
Dew Days Committee
Farmington Library
Farmington Youth Hockey
Finch and Daisy
Friends of the Mississippi
Happy Harry’s Furniture
Heritage Figure Skating Club
ISD 192
MN DNR
Rotary Club
South of the River Recreators
Southern Hills Golf Course
Muddy Waters
Movies/Music in Park Sponsors
Appliance Renew
Castle Rock Bank
Chemquest/HOBO
Dakota Electric Association
Family Vision Clinic
Farmington Gymnastics
Farmington Liquors
Farmington Youth Hockey Association
Marschall Line
MInnwest Bank
Muddy Waters Studio
Old National Bank
Premier Bank
Stephen Cocrellie Farmers Inc.
The Legacy
VFW Post #7662
Support from Ads at the
RRC
Akin Hills Pet Hospital
Castle Rock Bank
Dakota Electric Association
Eucumen Centennial House
Family Vision Clinic
Farmington Liquors
Top Notch Properties
Trinity Health Services
Support from Dasher Ads at the
Schmitz-Maki Arena
Above All Hardwood Floors and Carpet
Castle Rock Bank
Cosmopolitan Orthodontics
Dakota County
Dakota County Lumber
Dakota Marine
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS
Community Engagement
Partnering with local organizations, businesses and residents is what makes Farmington Parks and Recreation
a successful system. The people in our community are generous with their ideas, muscle and money to make
our programs, parks and facilities the best they can be. We are happy to have such wonderful continued
support as we strive to meets the needs of our growing community.
Popcorn at all Music & Movie Events
Sponsored by Marschall Line
Ceramics and Painting Classes
Sponsored by Muddy Waters Studio
Story Trail in the Park
Sponsored by Farmington Library &
Park and Recreation
Food Truck Festival
Sponsored by Empire & Farmington
Parks and Recreation Commissions
Literacy Nights
Sponsored by ISD. 192
Mowers
Commercial graded 4
scoop spreader replaces
2006 1-2 scoop residential
spreader.Two Toolcats with brooms were purchased to replace 2007
toolcat whose floorboard was held together with welding,
a major safety concern.
Seppi skid loader mulching head replaced 2017 swing boom
cutter that can't be safely used by one person and doesn't
poses the same cutting capabilities as the Seppi.
2022 John Deere Gator replaced a 2004
Workman that was rusting away and had
several safety concerns.
New Perkins garbage packer to pick
up downtown and parks.
Henderson dump body replaced
rusted dump body on 2007 truck
with only 55,000 miles.
Equipment Cost
Seppi
Mulching Head
$39,938
2021 Toro
Groundmaster
$115,795.91
2022 John Deere
Gator
$20,726.76
Two Toolcats
with Brooms
$129,169.05
Spreader $7,500
Henderson
Dump Body
$19,870
Total $332,999.72
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Infrastructure Support
Toro Groundmaster replaced a towed behind mower.
The tractor was a 2004 John Deere and the gang
mower attachment was from 2006.
Parks completed several important projects this year
including:
• Flagstaff Meadows Master Planning
• Tree Planting at Prairie Pines
• Trail reclamation at Mystic Meadows
• Installation of a root barrier at Mystic Meadows
• Fishing pier improvements at Lake Julia Park
• Feely Fields and Arena parking lot improvements
• Railings were raised on bridges by the Arena and
Kuchera's entrance to meet ADA regulations
• Sunny Hills Park playground completion
Farmington Elementary makes great use of the
outdoor ice Parks Maintenance staff floods and
maintains for them. In fact, Principal Kim Bollesson
tweeted:
"So many smiles! We love our rink!"
@FarmingtonMN
Students also created Thank You cards for the
staff.
2022 2021
230 275
Hours of Field Dragging
2022 2021
32 32
Flower Baskets &
Planters Watered DailySkaters at outdoor rinks
2022 2021
6,115 4,209
PARKS AND TRAILS
Infrastructure Support, Community Engagement
Flagstaff Meadows Park | Master Plan
City Council Approved - August 15, 2022
210TH ST W
EXISTING STORMWATER POND
EXISTING TRAIL
EXISTING TRAIL
EXISTING STORMWATER POND
EXISTING PRE- TREATMENT AREA
EXISTING EASEMENT
EXISTING EASEMENT
FUTURE PARK
EXISTING PRE-TREATMENTAREA
OPEN LAWN
OPEN LAWN
BENCH
BENCH
DOG WASTE
PLAYGROUND
OPEN LAWN
SHADE STRUCTURE
MONUMENT SIGN
MONUMENT SIGN
BENCH
BENCH
TRAIL
PLAYGROUND(8,000) SQFT)
SHADE STRUCTURE & CONCRETE PLAZA
PROPOSED STORMWATER EXTENSION
TRAIL WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO WEST
PROJECT BOUNDARY
FL
E
M
M
I
N
G
S
T
Root barrier at Mystic Meadows Trails.
Sunny Hills Park
2022 2021
211 221
Learn to Skate
2022 2021
326 375
Skating Special
Events
Total
Hours of Ice
2022 2021
1,481.5 1,640
Total Revenue
Ice Rental
Pre-audit
2022 2021
$329,317.50 $361,099
Skate with Santa collected 181.5 lbs. of food that was
donated to 360 Communities Farmington Food Shelf.SCHMITZ-MAKI ARENA
Community Engagement, Infrastructure Support
The Spruce St. project and parking lots changed the traffic patterns at the
arena. People are getting used to one way in and out on the west side of the
arena. The parking lot lights are new. The parking lot on the east was also
paved. This project will be finished this year.
2022 2021
18 19
Senior Men
Hours of Ice
2022 2021
88 96
Misc. Ice
Hours of Ice
2022 2021
244.5 269.5
Summer Ice
Hours of Ice
2022 2021
795.25 777.75
FYHA
Hours of Ice
2022 2021`
335.75 478.5
High School
Hours of Ice
A new skate sharpener was purchased.
Tiger T-ball and Footfire Soccer had
sessions throughout June and July,
utilizing parent volunteers and recreation
staff.
This year, we brought back the “Pie a
Coach in the Face” event from 2017.
During the last night of T-ball, kids play
various T-ball related games and are
able to win the chance to pie one of their
coaches in the face by hitting a ball off
the tee into a bucket. This event is fun for
the kids, parents and staff alike!
The last night of soccer included a fun
game where the kids played against
their parents. The kids had a blast on this
game night!
SPORTS
Community Engagement
2022 2021
145 271
Tiger T-ball
2022 2022
62 71
Golf
2022 2021
77 155
Footfire Soccer
2022 2021
209 261
Flag Football
2022 2021
41 33
Tennis
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
Infrastructure Support
Staff repainted the large conference room
at City Hall.
Staff have been replacing
lights with more efficient LED
bulbs citywide,
Staff dug a trench by hand to
accommodate the cable for the new
camera at Fire Station 2.
In addition to their
daily duties,
Building
Maintenance staff:
• Strip and wax the
floors 2x per year.
• Clean the carpets
at all the buildings
2x per year.
• Clean the
Rambling River
Center after
rentals.
• Assist with setting
up all the
polling locations
during election
years.
Puppet Wagon is also sponsored by Empire. In addition to partially funding
the wagon, staff performs at an Empire park and they promote the program
with sandwich board signs in the Empire neighborhoods.
Seasonal staff worked hard to make the puppet shows more engaging and
perfecting the sound. They did such a great job, we received the following:
RECREATION
Community Engagement
2022 2021
34 36
Adventure Camp
2022 2021
29 22
Safety Camp
2022 2021
67 36
Littles Camps
2022 2021
356 140
Geocaching
2022 2021
347 88
Story Time
2022 2021
343 not offered
Story Trails
2022 2021
1,494 1,472
Puppet Wagon
2022 2021
124 29
Breakfast with the Bunnies
I just wanted to reach out and let you know how awesome the puppet wagon
was today! The sound system worked great, the show was engaging and the
kids loved the music and dancing in the beginning.
We appreciate you guys taking the time to come back and show us your new
and improved show! We look forward to the rest of the summer!
thanks,
Sara Soriano
Assistant Director Cornerstone Preschool and Childcare
Geocaching, Storytime in the Parks
and Story Trails are all done in
partnership with the Farmington
Library. We have seen huge increases
in participation in these programs.
2022 2021
191 324
Movies in
the Park
2022 2021
1,293 1,321
Halloween
Walk
2022 2021
200 279
Secret Holiday
Shop
2022 2021
156 153
Trains and
Treats
SPECIAL EVENTS
Community Engagement
Created by Samy Menaifrom the Noun Project
2022 2021
191 79
Pond and
Park Clean up
2022 2021
133 92
Dew Run
2022 2021
212 140
Parent/Child
Dance
2022 2021
740 475
Music in the
Park
The Tiger Cub Pep Fest and Halloween Wark are co-sponsored by Parks
and Recreation and Farmington Community Education.
At the Tiger Cub Pep Fest, families enjoyed getting together and dancing
to a DJ following the Homecoming Parade to cheer on the Farmington
Tigers.
At the Halloween Walk, businesses connected with the community as
they handed out candy and other treats to the families in attendance.
We had a blast celebrating
the 40th Anniversary of the
Rambling River Center. In
addition to a hog roast with
music by the Polka Dots, we
held a pumpkin decorating
contest, had a photo booth
and put together a time
capsule to be opened in 2062.
2022 2021
65 57
Volunteers
2022 2021
2,135 2,135
Created by Fiona OMfrom the Noun Project
Volunteer
Hours
2022 2021
$53,186.57 $25,819
Fundraising
and Donations
Neil Anderson, Minnwest Bank, presented the
Rambling River Center Advisory Board with a
check for $16,000 for the passenger van.
The former bus was pulled from service in
August for failing to pass the DOT inspection.
All fundraising and donations in 2022 went
toward funding the passenger van.
A memorial bench and
landscaping were installed in
honor of the 40th Anniversary,
The donation of landscaping
(magnolia tree, plants, limestone
boulders, and mulch) was
donated by MN Nice Gardens
and Landscapes.
RAMBLING RIVER CENTER
Community Engagement
Programming continues to increase bringing us closer to
pre-pandemic numbers. Fitness classes, trips, and bingo
top the list.
2022 2021
132 79
Rentals
2022 2021
399 471
Created by asianson.designfrom the Noun Project
Members
2022 2021
11,777 8,728
Program Participants
Ramp handrails were
completed and installed.
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Infrastructure Support & Community Engagement
Emerald ash borer (EAB) has
hit Farmington, 117 turf area
park trees were identified with
EAB. Twentyseven trees (Prairie
View Park and Fair Hills) were
treated. Fifteen trees (Hill Dee
Park, Rambling River Park, and
Westview Acres) were cut down.
The bath house at Evergreen Knoll
Park was removed.
The RRC Advisory Board planned and hosted
a very successful 40th Anniversary Party.
They also held several successful fundraisers
including the Arts and Crafts Fair and Breakfast
& Silent Auction. Thank you Marjorie Koski, Judy
Janke, Pennie Page, Larry Smith, Mary Garlets,
Pat Hennen, and Blanche Reichert.
RAMBLING RIVER CENTER
ADVISORY BOARD
This Parks and Recreation Commission worked with
HKGi and the advisory committee to present three
master plan ideas for the Jim Bell Park and Preserve.
They reviewed playground equipment proposals and
went on a tour of the parks and facilities with the City
Council and the RRC Advisory Board. Thank you David
McMillen, Katherine Caron, Katie Putt, Ashley Crabtree,
and Elizabeth Koss.
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
BOARD & COMMISSION
Community Engagement
Graffiti and vandalism are
ongoing issues.
An advisory committee was created to develop a Master Plan for Jim Bell Park and
Preserve. The intent of this group was to help steward the planning process, provide
input on deliverables and concepts, advise on implementation, and assist with public
engagement and outreach. In April, three concept plans were presented to the city
council.
It was at this point in the master planning process the team decided to evaluate the
city’s park system as a whole. The Park System Analysis and Asset Management Tool were
presented to the City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission in November.
We look forward to updating Farmington parks to meet the needs of Farmington's growing
population.
QUESTIONS
Community Engagement
TO :Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers
F R O M :Kellee O mlid, Parks and Recreaon D irector
S U B J EC T:Parks and Facilies Tour with Rambling River C enter A dvis ory Board and City
Council
DATE:March 8, 2023
B A C KG R O U N D
At its J anuary 11, 2023 meeng, the parks and recreaon commis s ion idenfied three potenal dates for
the parks and facilies tour with the Rambling River Center A dvisory Board (R R C A B) and city council.
The dates were Wednesdays, A ugust 16, 23, and 30 at 6:00 p.m.
The R R C A B at its February 13, 2023 meeng dis cus s ed the three idenfied dates for the parks and
facilies tour and preferred either A ugust 23 or 30, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. S taff dis cus s ed the tw o dates w ith
City A dministrator G ors ki and it w as decided A ugus t 30 w ould be the best date for the tour. O nce the
date is approved by commission, s taff w ill let city council know to hold A ugus t 30 at 6:00 p.m. for the
parks and facilies tour.
S taff is recommending w aing unl the J une commission meeng to finalize and approve the parks and
facilies stops. I f the commis s ion is comfortable w ith A ugust 30 as the tour date and finaliz ing the
s chedule in June, commission should approve the date.
TO :Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers
F R O M :Kellee O mlid, Parks and Recreaon D irector
S U B J EC T:Fall Food Truck Event with Empire Parks and Recreaon C ommis s ion
DATE:March 8, 2023
B A C KG R O U N D
Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission and Empire Parks and Recreaon Commission (E P R C )
hos ted the first-ever G rab & G o Food Truck Event on F riday, M ay 20, 2022 from 5:00 – 8:00 p.m. The
event was held at S telzel Ball F ields, 19290 Chippendale Ave. W. There w ere five food trucks at the event.
Farmington Parks and Recreaon s taff and E P R C w ere very happy with how things turned out and heard
many posive comments from people a:ending. The food trucks w ere pleased w ith their s ales and all
expressed an interes t in returning. O ne of the food trucks es mated at least 1,200 people based on
previous events they parcipated in and the number they s erved. Thus, a fall food truck event was held
S eptember 9, 2022 at S telz el Ball F ields . There w ere six food trucks that parcipated, but unfortunately
the weather didn’t cooperate and the number of people a:ending w as down.
At the joint parks and recreaon commissions meeng on O ctober 10, 2022 the cons ensus was to
connue to hos t a spring and fall food truck event. At the meeng, it was decided F riday, M ay 19, 2023
at S telz el Ball F ields w ould be the s pring event. There was also discussion to explore the fall event being
held in Farmington in conjuncon w ith the H omecoming Parade and Tiger Cub Pep Fes t, which is typically
held the Wednesday of H omecoming Week. Empire w ill contact food trucks for the spring event and
Farmington will for the fall event. Bas ed on several food trucks already being booked last year when w e
contacted them, the plan was to contact food trucks in the fall for the spring event and in the s pring for
the fall event.
Recently, staff contacted the Athlec D irector (A D ) at Farmington H igh S chool to s ee if the date of
H omecoming had been s et and, if not, w hen it would be. The Minnes ota S tate H igh S chool L eague
doesn’t releas e the football schedule for the next tw o years unl M ay. A s s oon as the A D receives the
s chedule, the date for H omecoming can be s et. They try to align the home football game w ith as many
home games as possible for other sports .
Commission members s hould be prepared to dis cus s the fall food truck event, H omecoming, and
potenal locaons in Farmington to hold it.
TO :Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers
F R O M :Kellee O mlid, Parks and Recreaon D irector
S U B J EC T:Bike Pedes trian P lan P riories
DATE:March 8, 2023
B A C KG R O U N D
The C ity of Farmington’s Bike Pedes trian P lan (P lan) w as adopted by city council at its June 17, 2019
meeng. The city w orked w ith H KG i to develop the adopted plan, w hich w as funded through a S tatewide
H ealth I mprovement Partners hip (S H I P ) with D akota County in the amount of $32,000.
I n 2022, one of commission’s P lan priories from 2020 was completed. Bike and pedestrian safety
improvements along Minnes ota Trunk H ighw ay 3 (M N T H 3) were finis hed. A roundabout w as
cons tructed at the inters econ of M N T H 3 and County Road 66. D uring construcon of the roundabout,
a trail was also constructed on the w est side of M N T H 3 from 205th S treet West in Empire to W illow
S treet in Farmington. I n addion, a trail w as constructed on the eas t s ide of M N T H 3 from County Road
66 to 209th S treet Wes t and a trail on County Road 66 from M N T H 3 to Cas cade D rive.
There was dis cus s ion last year regarding compleng some of the educaon priories such as a bike
rodeo. A lthough a bike rodeo w asn’t held, parks and recreaon offered a bicycle maintenance class in
s pring 2022, but the class was canceled due to low registraon numbers. S taff reached out to the bicycle
technician this w inter to s ee if he was interested in trying to offer the clas s this s pring or summer, but
didn’t receive a response.
S taff has been working w ith D akota C ounty staff to receive proposals and hire a cons ultant to prepare
30% design plans for the trail gap on the w est side of P ilot Knob Road. This trail gap is idenfied in the
bike ped plan and has als o been idenfied by the county as a trail gap. This project w ould also include
design for a trail on the east side of P ilot Knob Road from C S A H 50 to C R 64 (195th S t.).
The bike ped plan s tates “The City w ill encourage all s chools to parcipate in S afe Routes to S chool
program, and parcipate in S afe Routes to S chool planning and implementaon w here possible”. C ity
s taff (P lanning M anager, A s s is tant C ity Engineer, D eputy C hief of Police, and Parks and Recreaon
D irector) has been parcipang in the S afe Routes to S chool P lanning for Boeckman Middle S chool. The
final plan is ancipated to be completed in June, which will include a summary of is s ues, opportunies,
and recommendaons . S taff als o recommended G reat O aks A cademy apply for a S afe Routes to S chool
P lanning A ssistance G rant and parcipated in the applicaon proces s . G reat O aks A cademy should learn
s oon if they are aw arded a grant. I f they receive the grant, the city will parcipate in the planning which
w ould likely s tart this s ummer w ith the plan completed by June 2024.
O ne of commission’s 2023 work plan goals is to review the P lan and idenfy priories to accomplish this
year. C ommis s ion is asked to review the plan and have a discussion on want they w ant to work on this
year.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material Bike Pedestrian Plan
FARMINGTON BIKE + PED PLAN
June 17, 2019
ii
Prepared by:
Funding provided
by:
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
Project Manager:
Randy Distad, CPRP
Farmington Parks and Recreation Director
City of Farmington
430 Third St.
Farmington, MN 55024
Phone: 651-280-6851
Email: rdistad@farmingtonmn.gov
Acknowledgements:
The City of Farmington
Dakota County Public Health Department
Minnesota Department of Health
Members of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Committee:
Dan Miller, Randy Distad, Laurie Suchanek,
Amy Morgan, Krista Tesky, Phil Windschitl,
Kate Matusinec, Kyle Anderson, Tony
Wippler, Ryan Hayes, Gary Rutherford,
Pennie Page
This plan was adopted by the City of Farmington on June 17, 2019.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
01 INTRODUCTION 1-1
Plan and Project Purpose 1-2
Why Plan for Biking and Walking Today? 1-2
Plan Objectives 1-4
Plan Funding 1-5
Project Timeline 1-7
02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-1
Farmington in Context 2-2
Existing Travel Behavior and Characteristics 2-4
Relevant Plan Review 2-8
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network 2-14
Level of Traffic Stress Analysis 2-16
Community Engagement Phase 1 2-25
Community Engagement Phase 2 2-28
03 NETwORk PlAN 3-1
System Goals 3-2
Draft Network Plan 3-2
Network Plan Elements 3-4
Intersection Treatments 3-9
System Recommendations 3-11
04 IMPlEMENTATION 4-1
Implementation Plan 4-2
Implementation Recommendations 4-2
Phasing Strategy 4-4
Operations + Maintenance 4-12
Funding Strategies 4-13
TABLE OF
Contents
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
ik
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
iii
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1-2 Plan and Project Purpose
1-2 Why Plan for Biking and Walking Today?
1-4 Plan Objectives
1-5 Plan Funding
1-7 Project Timeline
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
1-1 introduction
1-2
Plan and Project Purpose
the following serve as the purpose of the Farmington Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan.
»to addresses the future of a city-wide bicycle and pedestrian
network, building off of the existing network.
»to incorporate community feedback and community desires
towards bicycle and pedestrian goals and while being balanced
with city staff recommendations and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
committee feedback.
»to identify best practices and guide the city in future facility and
network investments.
»to guide policy and programming improvements, such as
wayfinding, bike parking and educational/encouragement
activities.
why Plan for Biking and walking Today?
over time, the purposes for biking and walking have changed
dramatically. Walking is the original form of transportation. it has
always been the cheapest and most environmentally friendly way of
getting around. the introduction of the bicycle in the early 1800’s
carried many of the same benefits and allowed people to travel
more efficiently, faster, and longer distances. after the advent of
the personal automobile and its increased popularity in the 1920s
and 30s, biking and walking for transportation purposes began
to decline and was seen mostly for sport, exercise, or recreational
purposes.
today, biking and walking is again become more popular for
multiple purposes as many people are recognizing the importance
of living an active and healthy lifestyle. the following are some
key reasons for planning for the future bicyclists and pedestrians in
Farmington.
»Safety: evidence suggests that high-bicycling-mode-share cities
are not only safer for bicyclists but for all road users. Further,
bike facilities themselves act as “calming” mechanisms on traffic,
slowing cars and reducing fatalities1.
»Livability + Mobility: Fifty percent of u.s. residents say that
walkability is a top priority or high priority when considering
where to live2. Bicycling has become the country’s fastest-growing
form of transportation for commuters.
1 University of Colorado Denver. (2019, May 29). Cycling lanes reduce fatalities for all
road users, study shows: Roads are safer for motorists, pedestrians and cyclists in cities with
robust bike facilities. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 31, 2019 from www.sciencedaily.com/
releases/2019/05/190529113036.htm
2 Urban Land Institute: America in 2015: A ULI Survey of Views on Housing, Transportation,
and Community. Washington, D.C.: the Urban Land Institute, 2015.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
1-3 introduction
»Health: the cost of obesity in minnesota is $3.2 billion per
year3. improving streetscapes and biking and walking facilities
ensures that all community members can walk and bike safely and
conveniently throughout the day.
»Household and Community Prosperity: according to aaa, it
costs an average of $8,849 to operate the average car for 2018,
or about $737 per month4. not all households can afford to
own a car and some lower income households who do own a
car because they feel that is the only way to get around may be
sacrificing other basic needs in order to get by.
»Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: the transportation
sector generates the largest share (28.9%) of greenhouse gas
emissions5. Walking or cycling could realistically substitute for
41% of short car trips (less than 3 miles), saving nearly 5% of
co2e emissions from car travel6.
»Recreation: trails and greenways provide facilities for
recreational purposes. trails provide a unique facility to serve
a diverse population of a community that may otherwise have
limited opportunities to access natural areas due to financial or
transportation constraints.
»Parking and Transportation Networks: as more people bike
and walk to destinations such as retail, restaurants, entertainment,
and work, the demand for vehicle parking decreases, allowing
buildings to be closer to each other and become even more
walkable. encouraging active transportation and bringing travel
origins and destinations closer together can help alleviate traffic
congestion7.
»Regional Economic Competitiveness / Tourism: as bicycling
and walking networks have grown, so have active transportation–
oriented developments and bike-friendly businesses. numerous
studies have shown that real estate values increase with proximity
to bicycle paths and walking trails. Bike lanes also help companies
score talented workers8.
»Sustainability / Resilience: Because biking and walking doesn’t
3 Trogdon JG, Finkelstein EA, Feagan CW, Cohen JW. State‐and Payer‐Specific Estimates
of Annual Medical Expenditures Attributable to Obesity. Obesity. 2012; 20(1):214-20 [Figure
adjusted for inflation using 2017 dollars]
4 Your Driving Costs: How Much Are You Really Paying to Drive? [Brochure]. (2018 Edition)
Heathrow, FL: AAA Association Communication
5 U.S. EPA’s Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2017. https://
www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks
6 Neves, A., & Brand, C. (2018, August 31). Assessing the potential for carbon emissions
savings from replacing short car trips with walking and cycling using a mixed GPS-travel
diary approach. Retrieved May 31, 2019, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/
article/pii/S0965856417316117
7 Wen, Liang; Kenworthy, Jeff; Guo, Xiumei; Marinova, Dora. 2019. “Solving Traffic
Congestion through Street Renaissance: A Perspective from Dense Asian Cities.” Urban Sci. 3,
no. 1: 18.
8 “Protected Bike Lanes Mean Business,” by PeopleforBikes and the Alliance for Biking &
Walking
The amount of space 69 people occupy on bike,
on-foot, and in 60 cars. Source: Cycling Promotion
Fund
1-4
rely on burning fossil fuels they are more resilient to swings in
fuel prices and are far cheaper to repair. From a sustainability
perspective, bicycles can be produced for a fraction of the
materials, energy, and shipping costs of a car. Biking and walk
also saves taxpayers money by reducing road wear. a 20-pound
bicycle causes less wear on the pavement than a two-ton vehicle.
Plan Objectives
the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan focuses on a variety
of objectives to holistically address bicycle and pedestrian
issues. objectives focus on physical infrastructure improvements,
programmatic solutions, and policy-driven decisions. the following
13 objectives, broken down into five categories help guide the
direction of the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.
Facilities / Infrastructure
»Fill network gaps, address problem intersections and barriers
»Find ways to make biking and walking safe, convenient, and easy
»define trail, sidewalk, and facility standards that are reasonable,
enforceable, and sustainable for the city of Farmington
Address a Variety of Users
»define a cohesive, connected walking and biking network in
Farmington that meets the needs of:
-Commuters
-Recreational bicyclists, hikers
-People with disabilities
-People who don’t have the ability or interest in driving
-People who use public transportation
-Children, young people
-Seniors
Make Connections
»Better connect residents and visitors of Farmington to:
-Parks
-Schools
-Community Destinations
-Employment Centers
-Commercial Centers + Businesses
-Neighborhoods
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
1-5 introduction
Encourage / Educate
»identify programs and initiatives to support walking and biking in
Farmington.
»Promote active living
»identify ways to make biking, walking, and other passive forms of
exercise part of daily routines
Prioritize and Implement
»define community goals and a vision for the future of walking and
biking in Farmington
»recommend strategies for phasing and implementation of the
Plan
»identify ‘champions’ or stewards for recommendations that can’t
be addressed by the city alone
»design the plan and plan process to assist with future fund-raising
or grant-writing
»identify priority projects, projects that can be started right away
Plan Funding
to create this plan, the city received grant funding from the dakota
county Health department through funding it receives from the
statewide Health improvement Partnership (sHiP) grant program
from the minnesota department of Health.
the city of Farmington and dakota county have a history of
working collaboratively on the design and construction of trails and
sidewalks within dakota county rights-of-way. in the last ten years,
the city and the county have worked together to develop approved
regional greenway master plans that will eventually connect the city
to the county’s regional park and trail system. also as a result of the
collaboration, 13 miles of trail, or approximately 30% of the exiting
trail system in Farmington is within dakota county rights-of-way.
sHiP supports community-driven solutions to expand opportunities
for active living, healthy eating and commercial tobacco-free living.
minnesota communities are working with sHiP to promote active
transportation to provide safe and convenient opportunities for
physical activity.
active transportation can be encouraged through:
»sidewalks, walking paths and bike facilities
»safe and convenient pedestrian street crossing features such
as crosswalks, stop signs, stop lights and other street crossing
elements
»motorist traffic calming and speed-reduction measures
1-6
TASK NOV ‘18 DEC JAN ‘19 FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE
1: Organize the Effort
1.1 Kick off meeting + system tour
1.2 Develop project outreach materials
1.3 Develop Community Engagement Plan
1.4 Develop and launch community survey
1.5 Stakeholder Listening Sessions
2: Inventory and Analysis
2.1 Assemble Background Data
2.2 Review Relevant Plans
2.3 Perform System Analysis
2.4 City Staff Meeting: Go-To Meeting
2.5 BPP Committee Meeting #1
2.6 Community Open House #1
2.7 Process community feedback
2.8 Prepare Existing Conditions Report
3: Plan and System Recommendations
3.1 Develop Draft Plan Framework
3.2 Develop System Plan +
Recommendations
3.3 Staff Workshop
3.4 BPP Committee #2
3.5 City Staff Meeting: Go-To Meeting
3.6 Community Open House#2
3.7 Develop and launch community survey
4: Final Plan + Deliverables
4.1 Revision of Draft Plan
4.2 Final Draft Document + Action Plan
4.3 BPP Committee #3
4.4 City Staff Meeting
4.5 Council, Planning and Parks
Commission Joint Workshop
4.6 City Council Final Presentation +
Approval
4.7 Final Document deliverables
Meeting Key
City Staff Meeting (5 total) Community Survey (2 total)
BPP Committee Meeting (3 total)City Council/Commission Meeting (3-4 total)
Community Open House (2 total)
End date: Feb. 1st
Revised 3/19/19Farmington Bike + Ped PlanFigure 1.1 Project Timeline
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
1-7 introduction
»street landscaping and pedestrian-level street lighting
»Bike racks, lockers, or other bike parking and storage facilities
»land use development patterns to locate homes, work sites,
schools, stores and other community services and amenities
within reasonable walking distances (pedestrian-oriented
development) and within easy access to transit (transit-oriented
development)
»signage that helps pedestrians and bicyclists navigate to their
destinations.
Project Timeline
the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian plan was completed over an
eight-month period (see Figure 1.1) from its kick-off in november
2018 to its completion in June 2019. initial engagement efforts
began in december 2018 and lasted until February 2019. after the
preparation of the existing conditions report and the development
of draft plan and recommendations, a second round of engagement
took place from april 2019 to may 2019. the final draft of the Plan
was completed and approved on June 17, 2019.
Photo Credit: Jenny Olmanson
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
2-1 existing conditions
CHAPTER 2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
2-2 Farmington in Context
2-4 Existing Travel Behavior and Characteristics
2-8 Relevant Plan Review
2-14 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network
2-16 Level of Traffic Stress Analysis
2-25 Community Engagement Phase 1
2-28 Community Engagement Phase 2
Farmington
Minneapolis
Saint Paul
Afton
Apple Valley
Arden
Hills
Bayport
Birchwood Village
Blaine
Bloomington
Brooklyn
Center
Brooklyn Park
Burnsville
Carver
Chanhassen
Chaska
Circle Pines
Coates
Columbia Heights
Coon
Rapids
Corcoran
Cottage Grove
Crystal
Deephaven
Dellwood
Eagan
Eden Prairie
Edina
Elko New
Market
Excelsior
Falcon
Heights
Fridley
Gem
Lake
Golden Valley
Grant
Greenwood
Hampton
Hastings
Hilltop
Hopkins
Hugo
Inver Grove
Heights
Lake Elmo
Lakeland
Lakeville
Landfall
Lauderdale
Lexington
Lilydale
Lino Lakes
Little
Canada
Long Lake
Mahtomedi
Maple Grove
MaplewoodMedicine
Lake
Medina
Mendota
Mendota
Heights
Miesville
Minnetonka
Minnetonka Beach
Mounds
View
New
Brighton
New
Hope
New
Prague
New Trier
Newport
North Oaks
North
Saint
Paul
Oak Park
Heights
Oakdale
Orono
Osseo
Pine
Springs
Plymouth
Prior Lake
Richfield
Robbinsdale
Rosemount
Roseville
Saint
Anthony
Saint
Louis
Park
Saint
Paul
Park
Savage
Shakopee
Shoreview
Shorewood
South
Saint
Paul
Spring
Lake Park
Stillwater
Sunfish
Lake
Tonka
Bay
Vadnais
Heights
Vermillion
Wayzata
West
Saint
Paul
White
Bear
Lake
Willernie
Woodbury
Woodland
Figure 2.1 Farmington in the Regional Context
35E
35
94
694
494
35W
52
10169
36
55
3
42
64
50
31
Farmington in Context
Development Context
the development of Farmington occurred originally because of the
railroad system. the original town site, today’s downtown area, was
established at the intersection of two small rail lines - the minnesota
central and the Hastings & dakota - that ultimately became part of
the chicago, milwaukee and st. Paul railroad. the town’s business
district grew up adjacent to the milwaukee road depot. until the
1990s, Farmington’s commerce and industry was focused upon
agricultural production.
an area of lakeville township was annexed into Farmington in
1971. this major annexation immediately created a large gap of
undeveloped land between the original town of Farmington south of
the Vermillion river and this new residential area to the north.
2-2
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
With Farmington’s location on the edge of the twin cities metro area
(as seen in Figure 2.1), it experienced an unprecedented growth rate
during the mid 1990s. new housing developments were primarily
constructed in the city’s northern portion closer to lakeville than the
original town of Farmington. these new developments consisted
of typical suburban subdivisions of single-family homes laid out on
curvilinear streets. this growth intensified the disconnection and
development contrast between the northern and southern portions
of the city. as a result, Farmington as a whole is often perceived to
have two separate areas within the community, one north and one
south.
Because the original development of Farmington occurred due
to the railroad system rather than the interstate Highway system,
Farmington’s downtown and surrounding residential neighborhoods
consist of small, walkable, human-scale blocks with sidewalks.
immediately adjacent to the original location of Farmington is a
newer residential development that duplicates the small-block
roadway pattern. the curvilinear and disconnected street pattern
of much of the newer development of the 1970s and afterward
presents more difficulties for walking and biking because of the
circuitous and indirect routes they create with gaps in the sidewalk
and trail network.
Existing Funding Sources
the capital improvement projects in parks and trails have been
funded over the years through two funding sources. the first
funding source has been through funds received from residential,
commercial and industrial development. these funds were received
as cash in lieu of land through the park dedication process. the
second source of funding has been through the city’s municipal
liquor store profit transfers.
the city implemented an annual pavement management program
for trail maintenance in 2012. the pavement management program
provides annual funding for crack sealing and fog sealing trails. the
city is broken into five areas, which results in every trail in the city
receiving maintenance work at least once every five years.
While there is annual funding in place for pavement management
of trails, there is currently inadequate funding for replacement of
trail sections that have so badly deteriorated that crack sealing and
fog sealing hold no benefit. this is due to parts of the trail system
being initially constructed more than 30 years ago. as a result, if
the city wishes to continue to have a usable, safe and connected
trail system, then a long term funding plan and source should be
explored to be implemented in order to provide the funds needed
to replace the city’s existing trail infrastructure over time.
in 2017, a trail wayfinding signage program was initiated. three
different park and open space areas were identified that contained
highly used trail loops. the wayfinding signage program was funded
by the municipal Farmington liquor store operational profits.
2-3 existing conditions
Table 2.1 Bike/Walk Mode Share Over
Time
ModE 2000 2010 2016
Bicycle 0.0%0.2%0.6%
Walk 1.3%0.7%0.6%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Multiple Years
73
75
81
336
536
1,001
10,051
Walk
Bicycle
Other
Public Transportation
Work at Home
Carpooled
Drove Alone
Figure 2.2 Means of Transportation to Work
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Existing Travel Behavior and Characteristics
data available through the us census Bureau and the metropolitan
council help paint a picture of how Farmington residents are
currently getting around the city and to other destinations. analyzing
data that signifies a greater potential for walking and biking, such as
zero-car households or households in poverty, also helps Farmington
understand how much demand may exist for better walking and
biking facilities.
Bike and walk Mode Share
Because trips to work make up a large majority of daily
transportation, analyzing how residents get to work provides a good
snapshot of typical mode share in Farmington. mode share is the
percentage of travellers using a particular type of transportation.
Figure 2.2 highlights how Farmington residents get to work most
days of the year. in most american cities, especially suburban
cities, many residents drive to work alone. an estimated 83% of
Farmington residents drive to work compared to 76% of all us
citizens. approximately 75 people bike to work in Farmington and
an estimated 73 people walk to work. non-motorized transportation
accounts for 1.5% total in Farmington. of note, the us census does
not account for partial trips so if a resident decides to bike to the
nearest transit stop and take the bus to work, that trip will likely be
counted as a transit trip if the transit portion of the trip is longer
in length. one significant fact to note about travel is that every
person, regardless of the main travel mode, is a pedestrian at one
point in time whether it’s walking (or rolling) from their car to their
work entrance, walking to the transit stop, or walking to a neighbors
house to carpool to work.
as seen in table 2.1, walking and biking as a means of getting to
work has shifted over time in Farmington. generally, the amount of
people biking to work has seen an upward trend since 2000. the
percent of people in Farmington walking to work has declined since
2000. Both of these trends aren’t necessarily unique to Farmington;
2-4
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
1,290
10,863
Co
m
m
u
t
e
Le
s
s
T
h
a
n
1
0
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
Co
m
m
u
t
e
Mo
r
e
T
h
a
n
10
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
Figure 2.3 Travel Time to Work
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
12,801
1,278
5,003Workers Employed
in City
Workers Living and
Employed in City
Workers Living in
City
Figure 2.4 Employment Inflow and Outflow in Farmington
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination
Employment Statistics 2015
TRAVEl DISTANCE IN FARMINGTON
Source: HKGi, Metropolitan Council Travel
Behavior Inventory 2010 Household Interview
Survey
most us cities are seeing an increase in bike mode share as
bicycling becomes a more attractive, acceptable, and safer mode of
transportation.
Travel Distance and Destination
one of the largest determinants of how someone gets to their
destination is the distance needed to travel. When a person is less
than three miles from their destination, the chances of biking to their
destination are more likely. similarly when a person is less than a half
mile away from their destination, they are more likely to walk. even if
individuals don’t choose to bike or walk to their destination, chances
are that they are far more likely to consider it as an option if the
distance needed to travel is short, especially when quality bike and
walking facilities are present.
according to a sample of individuals surveyed in the metropolitan
council’s 2010 travel Behavior inventory, half of all trips in
Farmington are six miles or less. nearly 30% of all trips made in
Farmington are three miles or less and 7% are a half mile or less.
While Farmington residents, workers, and visitors may not be
choosing to bike or walk for all their trips, there is great potential as
a large number of trips are short and could easily be made my foot,
bike, or other mobility assisting device other than an automobile.
as observed in Figure 2.3, for all modes of transportation, the
majority of Farmington residents have a commute to work that
is longer than 10 minutes. However, there are almost 1,300
2-5 existing conditions
177
898
2,636
3,995
More Workers than Vehicles
Households with No Workers
Less Workers than Vehicles
Equal Number of Workers and Vehicles
Figure 2.5 Vehicle Competitive Households in Farmington
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Table 2.2 Where Farmington Residents Work
WoRk LoCATioN WoRkERS PERCENT
Farmington, MN 1,278 10.0%
minneapolis, mn 1,199 9.4%
eagan, mn 1,064 8.3%
lakeville, mn 965 7.5%
st. Paul, mn 860 6.7%
Burnsville, mn 859 6.7%
Bloomington, mn 818 6.4%
apple Valley, mn 780 6.1%
rosemount, mn 322 2.5%
edina, mn 274 2.1%
all other locations 4,382 34.2%
ToTAL 12,801 100.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-
Destination Employment Statistics 2015
Table 2.3 Where Farmington Workers Live
HoME LoCATioN WoRkERS PERCENT
Farmington, MN 1,278 25.5%
lakeville, mn 591 11.8%
apple Valley, mn 334 6.7%
rosemount, mn 173 3.5%
Burnsville, mn 170 3.4%
northfield, mn 162 3.2%
eagan, mn 150 3.0%
minneapolis, mn 106 2.1%
st. Paul, mn 92 1.8%
Hastings, mn 67 1.3%
all other locations 1,880 37.6%
ToTAL 5,003 100.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-
Destination Employment Statistics 2015
Farmington residents that have less than a 10 minute commute. this
is further demonstrated in Figure 2.4 which shows that of the 12,800
workers that live in Farmington, there are almost 1,300 that also
work Farmington. it can be assumed that those with less than a 10
minute commute both live and work in Farmington.
Because such a large gap exists between the amount of people
who are currently walking and biking to work (148 people) and the
amount of people who live and work in Farmington with less than
a 10-minute commute (~1,300 people), there is great potential
to increase the non-motorized transportation mode share with
improved facilities. the availability and quality of biking and walking
infrastructure in adjacent and nearby cities also matters because
most Farmington residents work outside of the city and most
Farmington workers live outside the city, as seen in table 2.2 and
table 2.3.
all of the census data presented here points to an opportunity to
increase the mode share of biking and walking as a viable means of
transportation for a significant number of people living and working
in Farmington.
Selected Household Characteristics
2-6
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Table 2.4 Zero Vehicle Households
HouSEHoLd TyPE #%
number of Zero
Vehicle Households 144 1.9%
total Households 7,706 100.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American
Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Table 2.5 Poverty Status of Farmington Residents
SuBjECT ToTAL
PoPuLATioN
BELoW
PovERTy
LEvEL
% BELoW
PovERTy
LEvEL
Population Below Poverty level 22,090 627 2.8%
White 20,088 439 2.2%
Black or african american 304 85 28.0%
american indian 39 9 23.1%
asian 708 7 1.0%
Hispanic or latino 774 31 4.0%
other 951 87 9.1%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
When a household has more workers than it has vehicles, it is
classified as a vehicle competitive household. People within a
vehicle competitive household are oftentimes faced with the
decision of how they are going to get around because they do not
have the option to drive for every trip. When faced with conflicting
travel situations, some people decide to work alternative work
schedules, while others shift to a different means of transportation
such as carpooling, transit, walking, or biking.
Figure 2.5 highlights the number of vehicle competitive households
in Farmington. knowing this data provides a clue as to how many
workers could potentially benefit from a more connected bicycle
and pedestrian network. it also highlights the fact that, within the
right circumstances, not every eligible driver within a household in
Farmington needs to own a car, as they can supplement some trips
by walking or biking to nearby destinations.
the number of zero vehicle households, as presented in table
2.4, brings attention to the fact that there are 144 households in
Farmington that do not own a vehicle. these residents must rely
on other means of transportation. transit, non-motorized facilities,
and mobility services all need to work in conjunction year-around to
serve these households.
according to aaa, it costs an average of $8,849 to operate the
average car for 2018, or about $737 per month1. this amount
factors in all costs of auto ownership over the life of the vehicle. For
those living at or below the poverty level, vehicle ownership can
be a significant cost burden. this cost burden can be eliminated
or significantly lowered if a safe and convenient non-motorized
transportation network exists.
as seen in table 2.5, 627 (2.8%) Farmington residents live at or
below poverty level. a disproportionate level of minority populations
live below the poverty level in Farmington.
1 Your Driving Costs: How Much Are You Really Paying to Drive? [Brochure]. (2018
Edition) Heathrow, FL: AAA Association Communication
2-7 existing conditions
2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA
DRAFT DECEMBER 7, 2018
I Contents
Relevant Plan Review
a variety of plan documents were reviewed during the planning
process. these plans and supporting planning/policy documents
have been created over the last 10 years and provide a foundation
to build the future bike and pedestrian network in Farmington. the
following is an inventory of relevant findings from this plan review.
2040 City of Farmington Draft Comprehensive Plan (2018)
the city of Farmington updated it’s city-wide comprehensive
plan in 2018. this plain will serve as a strategic guide for future
development and public infrastructure to ensure a safe, well-
designed and economical environment for residential, commercial,
industrial and public activities. the draft plan was submitted to the
metropolitan council in december of 2018. the following 2040
draft comprehensive Plan chapters contain relevant background
and guidance for the Bike + Ped Plan:
Transportation
»stated goal to “promote transportation alternatives ensuring that
non-motorized, transit, and motorized travel needs are met in a
balanced manner consistent with community values.”
»current crash data shows that pedestrian crashes have been
located within neighborhood streets or along more rural sections
of roadways including akin road and Pilot knob road. Bicyclist
crash data indicates facilities may be needed along csaH 50 and
tH 3.
»tH 3 will likely expand into a 4-lane divided roadway.
»there is no scheduled or planned public transit service within
Farmington. an extension of the red line Bus rapid transit (Brt)
will result in a future station at cedar avenue and 215th street in
lakeville (closest transit station to Farmington).
»Future collector roadways in Farmington will have a multi-purpose
trail on one side, and a sidewalk on the other. Future local streets
are to have sidewalks on one side of the road, both sides if
conditions allow.
»the metropolitan council has defined the regional Bicycle
transportation network (rBtn) in an effort to establish regional
bike networks. Within the city of Farmington, three tier 2 rBtn
corridors have been identified: along csaH 50 between the west
city boundary and downtown, generally along a future alignment
of cr 33 extension or north creek, and an east/northwest
connection from Farmington into lakeville.
Cover of 2040 Comprehensive Plan DRAFT
December 7, 2018. Source: City of Farmington
RBTN Network, as shown in the 2040
Comprehensive Plan Draft. Tier 2 Corridors are
shown in green. Source: City of Farmington
2-8
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Existing and Proposed Park, Trail and Open Space
Plan, per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft. Source:
City of Farmington
Sustainability
»the city of Farmington is a member of minnesota greenstep
cities, and has been awarded step 2 status, as of 2018.
»there are at least (12) greenstep actions related to improving
the bicycle and pedestrian network that, if implemented, would
contribute towards reaching step 3 status for the city.
Parks and Recreation
»an updated existing and Proposed Park, trail and open space
plan is included in this chapter
»a recommendation includes development of a “Bike and
Pedestrian Plan that can be used to identify where [trail] gaps
currently occur along with ensuring that future new trails are
connected to the existing trail network.”
»the Five Year Parks and trail improvement Budget does not show
any funding allocated for trail improvements, highlighting a need
for a long-term funding strategy.
2-9 existing conditions
2030 Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2009)
a detailed Parks and recreation master Plan was developed in
coordination with the 2030 comprehensive Plan update in 2009.
this plan has served to guide the last 10 years of parks, open space,
and trail development in Farmington.
»an existing and Proposed Park, trail, and open space Plan
served as primary guidance for park and trail development from
2009-2018.
»this plan indicated strong community and city support for
expansion of the trail and sidewalk system
»a trail classification system was created, which includes park trails,
connector trails, bikeways, alternative use trails and greenways.
this classification system does not appear to have been
consistently employed over the last 10 years.
»trail priorities that were identified in this plan include construction
of ada compliant trails, loop trails of varying levels of difficulty,
adding trail amenities (restrooms, benches, bike racks,
drinking fountains) throughout the system, connecting future
neighborhood trails to commercial and industrial areas, and
developing a long-term financial plan for the development of
parks, open spaces and trails.
Safe Routes to School: Meadowview Elementary (2018)
a number of safe routes to school plans were completed in
2018 for Farmington area Public schools, including meadowview
elementary school. the purpose of this plan is to provide
recommendations and strategies to make walking and biking to
and around meadowview elementary school a safe, comfortable,
and fun activity for all students and families. the plan is structured
on the 6 e’s (engineering, evaluation, encouragement, education,
enforcement) and was created through the mndot srts Planning
assistance program.
»Per district policy, students must live at least 1 mile from their
school to qualify for district-provided (bus) transportation
»a survey of meadowview students in spring 2018 showed that
over 50% of students take the bus to and from school, 36% are
dropped off by family vehicle, 2% carpool, 6% walk, 2% walk, and
4% use other means of transportation.
»according to a parent survey, distance, weather, speed of traffic
and safety of intersections were the top reasons for not allowing
their kids to walk or bike to school.
»infrastructure recommendations include a focus on safety
improvements along 195th street (csaH 64) and creating another
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
")
!(
!(
!(
’
’
")
NORTH CREEK PARK
AUTUMNGLENOPENSPACE
RAMBLINGRIVER PARK
PR
A
I
R
I
E
V
I
E
W
W
A
T
E
R
W
A
Y
G
R
E
E
N
W
A
Y
VERMILLIONGROVEPARK
FARMINGTONPRESERVEPARK
DAISYKNOLLPARK
MEADOWVIEWPARK
LAKE JULIAPARK
MIDDLECREEKPARK
FA
I
RHILL
G
R
EE
NWAY
NORTHCREEKGREENWAY
PINEKNOLLPARK
PRAIRIEVIEWPARK
FAIRHILLSPARK
HILL DEEPARK
EVERGREENKNOLL PARK
HILLVIEWPARK
TAMARACKPARK
DAKOTA COUNTYESTATES PARK
WESTVIEWPARK
SCHMITZMAKIARENA
TROYHILLPARK
SILVERSPRINGSPARK
(FutureMiddleCreekGreenway)
(F u t u r e M i d d le C r e e k G r e e n w a y )
(
F
u
t
u
r
e
N
o
rt
h
C
r
e
e
k
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
)
(Future South Creek Greenway)
(F u t u r e V e r m illi o n Ri v e r G r e e n w a y )
(FutureMiddleCreekGreenway)
NEW HIGH SCHOOL SITE
MEADOWVIEWELEMENTARYSCHOOL
FARMINGTONHIGH SCHOOL
FARMINGTONMIDDLE SCHOOLEAST & WEST
AKIN ROADELEMENTARYSCHOOL
FARMINGTONELEMENTARYSCHOOL
(FutureRegionalTrail)
(FutureRegionalTrail)
3
64
64
50
74
31
50
Existing and Proposed Park, Trail and Open Space Plan Map, 2008
Prepared for the Farmington Parks Departmentby the Dakota County Office of GIS.0 21 Miles
µ
City of Farmington
Legend
Existing Trails
Proposed Trails
Schools
City Parks
Private Parks
Greenways
Proposed Parks
hg Community
hg Neighborhood
Map dated January, 2008.
Project #12001
MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
FARMINGTON AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Safe Routes to School
A plan to make walking and biking to school a safe, fun activity
JUNE 2018
Existing and Proposed Park, Trail and Open Space
Plan, per 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Source: City of
Farmington
(Above) Cover of Safe Routes to School Plan
for Meadowview Elementary School. Source:
Farmington Area Public Schools
2-10
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE STUDY | DRAFT DECEMBER, 2018 Introduction | 1-12
Figure 1-4: Pedestrian and Bicycle Demand Analysis
Pedestrian and Bicycle Demand Analysis, per
Dakota County Pedestrian and Bicycle Study.
Source: Dakota County
trail connection to the charleswood neighborhood to the east of
the school.
Dakota County Pedestrian and Bike Study (2018)
dakota county completed a Pedestrian and Bicycle study in 2018
as part of the dakota county 2040 transportation Plan update (to
be completed in 2019). the purpose of the Pedestrian and Bicycle
study is to create a unified vision for county-wide walking and
bicycling networks and to identify policies, strategies and tools to
encourage active living and improve community health.
»the study shows that within Farmington, there is moderate
demand for biking and walking in the downtown area, as well
as residential areas north of Highway 64 (195th street) near Pilot
knob road and surrounding Farmington High school.
»a level of traffic stress analysis was performed, identifying
comfort levels for existing county trails.
»the Planned county Bicycle network shows Pilot knob road and
Highway 64 included as planned and existing shared use (county)
trails through Farmington
City of Farmington Development Code
development standards per city of Farmington development code
were reviewed for specific items pertaining to bicycle and pedestrian
facilities. the following are key findings from this review:
»sidewalks shall be no less than 5’ in width, and provided where
city council deems it appropriate.
»trails shown in the comprehensive Plan shall be no less than 8’ in
width.
»all trails shall have at least 20’ wide access where the trail
connects to a street or sidewalks.
»developers are responsible for construction of trails as shown in
the comprehensive Plan.
»trails shall connect with existing trails or sidewalks.
»the Planning division, Parks and recreation department, and
engineering department shall determine feasibility for trail
construction near wetland or ponds.
»specific design standards exist for the spruce street commercial,
mixed use and Business/Flex Zoning districts. these standards
include provisions for sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and
pedestrian amenities. notably, bike parking shall be installed
at 10% of the total number of automobile spaces within
developments in these districts.
2-11 existing conditions
4t
h
6t
h
7t
h
3r
d
1s
t
5t
h
8t
h
2n
d
Spruce
Ak
i
n
208th
Main
Maple
Hickory
Willow
207th
Oak
Di
v
i
s
i
o
n
Pine
206th
Linden
Da
l
l
a
s
9th
Walnut
Co
l
o
r
a
d
o
Beech
Locust
213th
Ho
n
e
y
s
u
c
k
l
e
We
s
t
v
i
e
w
Westdel
209th
De
v
o
n
s
h
i
r
e
Ash
We
s
t
w
o
o
d
We
s
t
g
a
i
l
Hi
g
h
l
a
n
d
Locust
Maple
Pine
Oak
Beech
8t
h
7t
h
Hickory
Spruce
Pine
Hickory
Hickory
5t
h
8t
h
Walnut
Beech
")74
")50
")31
")66
")31
¬«3
Proposed Sidewalk + Mid-block Pedestrian Crossing
Proposed Trail
Proposed Regional Trail Connection
Existing Trail
Existing Sidewalk
Railroad Crossing
Signaled Intersection
Project Boundary
Pedestrian & bike circulation plan shows key opportunities for improving downtown’s walking and biking connections.
Figure 14: Bike and Pedestrian Network Plan
27 Farmington Downtown Redevelopment Plan
Highway 3 Corridor Plan (2019)
concurrent with the development of the Bike + Ped Plan, the city
of Farmington is developed a Highway 3 corridor Plan, which
was adopted by the city council on June 3rd, 2019. Highway 3
(tH 3) is a sate highway with existing land use incompatibilities
including a mix of residential homes and businesses. several smaller
redevelopment efforts and projects involving new construction or
redevelopment of existing buildings have occurred in recent years.
the purpose of the plan is to identify unique re-development
opportunities with the understanding that Highway 3 will likely
expand into a divided 4-lane highway.
»the project area consists of an approximately 2-mile stretch of tH
3 north of 225th street and south of Vermillion river trail (cr 66)
»community input gathered during this planning process includes
a number of issues raised related to biking and walking in
Farmington, including a concern for high vehicular speeds.
»today, frontage roads along the highway serve as informal ways
for bicyclists and pedestrians to travel along the corridor, in
addition to portions of paved wide shoulders along tH 3.
»in general, there is a need for improved pedestrian crossings
at major intersections, as well as dedicated pedestrian facilities
along the corridor
Downtown Redevelopment Plan (2016)
a downtown redevelopment Plan was created and adopted in
2016. this plan serves as a guide for the city council, economic
development authority, and other advisory commissions to identify
opportunities in the downtown area for redevelopment. the study
area encompasses 20 blocks between 1st street, Walnut street, 5th
street and the Vermillion river.
»Within the study area, an inventory of existing sidewalks and trails
show a lack of trails within the downtown area, although most
streets are served by sidewalks on both sides of the street
»downtown core redevelopment initiatives include improving
the pedestrian environment, adding bike trail facilities to the
river and regional trail connections, completing a downtown trail
network, and improving Highway 50 crossings for pedestrians and
bicyclists.
»the Bike and Pedestrian network Plan in this study shows a
proposed trail connection along the railroad to Pine street,
connecting to rambling river Park, as well as sidewalk
connections along 2nd street between Highway 50 and Walnut
street.
Example of community input comment gathered
through a Social Pinpoint web survey for
the Highway 3 Corridor Plan. Source: City of
Farmington
Bike and Pedestrian Network Plan, per the
Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Source: City of
Farmington
2-12
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
36 Chapter 3 the Plan
Figure 36. North Creek Greenway segment 3 concept plan
Segment 3: lakeville and Farmington North (3.5 miles)
From County Road 46 / 160th Street the
greenway will connect through the current
mining/future development area to the
Brandtjen Farm neighborhood and East
Lake Park, a City of Lakeville community
park. From East Lake Park to 195th Street,
the greenway will follow North Creek. In
this segment, much of the trail already is
constructed, with a few trail gaps.
From Fairhill Park the greenway heads
directly south, following North Creek about
a mile. North Creek then veers east while
the greenway continues south, crossing
Middle Creek and following the west side
of the Canadian Pacific Railway to the
Vermillion River. At the Vermillion River,
the greenway follows the river in both
directions: west to downtown Farmington
and Rambling River Park and east to a
community park in Empire Township.
Water crossings
For this segment of the greenway, three
bridge crossings will be necessary, as
shown on Figure 36. Bridges will be needed
to cross the north branch of North Creek in
an area to be developed in the future, the
wetland near 189th Street in Farmington
and Middle Creek north of downtown
Farmington.
Rambling River trailhead and downtown
Farmington
A trailhead is recommended at the ice arena
on the southwest edge of Rambling River
Park. Here there are opportunities to share
existing parking and restroom facilities
and add picnicking, interpretation and
wayfinding.
North Creek Greenway Segment Concept Plan,
per North Creek Greenway Master Plan. Source:
Dakota County
North Creek Greenway Master Plan 2011 37
Connections to destinations in downtown Farmington are also recommended. A trail link to a neighborhood gateway at
Farmington’s Depot Art Park is suggested. The trail connection to this gateway is shown in Figure 37.
Natural resources and water quality
east lake
f Continue buckthorn management.
f Perform prescribed burns on restored prairies on upland mine areas and oak woodlands.
f Address fall algae blooms in the lake.
north Creek corridor and preserve
f Restore prairie on uplands and oak woodlands on the berms to the east.
f Manage invasive vegetation along North Creek and adjacent areas.
Vermillion river and rambling river Park
f Widen and maintain stream buffers with native plants to improve floodplain wetlands and forest quality.
Rambling
River Park
3
Dodge
Middle
School
School
ballfields
Riverview
Elementary
School
200 Feet
ELM STREET
AK
I
N
R
O
A
D
CH
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
Proposed
bridge over
Vermillion
River
Proposed North Creek
Greenway regional
trail
Connection
to downtown
Farmington
Schmitz Maki
Arena
To Lakeville Depot
Way
Arts
Park
P
P
Figure 37. Downtown Farmington and rambling river Park
Trail connection
Wayfinding
Proposed grade
separated crossing
Existing grade
separated crossing
Existing regional trail
Existing local trail
Proposed regional trail
Proposed local trail
Greenway corridor
Gateway
landmark
Ver m i l l ion Riv e r
50
Downtown Farmington and Rambling River Park Concept Plan, per North Creek Greenway
Master Plan. Source: Dakota County
North Creek Greenway Master Plan
north creek is a tributary of the Vermillion river that connects
eagan, apple Valley, lakeville, Farmington and empire township.
the 14-mile north creek greenway will connect important regional
destinations, such as lebanon Hills regional Park, the minnesota
Zoo, downtown Farmington, the Vermillion river and Whitetail
Woods regional Park. today, portions of the regional trail are
completed within Farmington:
»section through north creek Park, Jim Bell Park and Preserve
Park crossing 195th street with a tunnel and traveling further
south along north creek.
»section along rambling river Park from schmitz-maki arena to
where the railroad corridor crosses the Vermillion river, following
the railroad north to 205th street
2-13 existing conditions
Table 2.6 Existing Facility Length
FACiLiTy TyPE LENGTH
(FT)
LENGTH
(Mi)
WALkiNG oNLy
sidewalk 163,502 31.0
natural surface 5,301 1.0
Boardwalk 1,489 0.3
MuLTi-uSE
Bridge 1,258 0.2
Paved trail 246,888 46.8
ToTAL MuLTi-uSE 248,146 47.0
ToTAL BikE ANd
WALk FACiLiTiES 418,438 79.2
Source: HKGi, City of Farmington
* Only includes paved trail and bridge facility
types
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network
the city currently owns and maintains 47 miles of paved asphalt
trails, one mile of natural surface trails and about a half mile of
boardwalks and bridges. consistently community surveys show
trails are one of the most used and most popular park/recreational
facilities in cities. Farmington residents overwhelmingly appreciate
and use the existing trail network, according to information gathered
through community engagement for this plan. there are 31 miles
of concrete sidewalks in Farmington, most of which are located in
the older neighborhoods of Farmington. all of these facilities are
illustrated in Figure 2.6 and quantified in table 2.6.
a majority of the paved trail system was constructed during the
peak of development in the city, which that occurred from the 1980s
through 2006. as a result, the city did not provide capital funding
to build most of the current trail system. the city has made an effort
to fund the construction of paved trails where gaps have occurred.
since the city began constructing trails in the 1980s, it has placed a
requirement that all trails be accessible according the requirements
outlined in the americans with disabilities act (ada). the ada
requires trails to be relatively flat with a slope of 5% or less. in
situations where ada requirements could not be met, the city has
provided a secondary or alternative trail route that accommodates
people of all ages and abilities to use the trail system.
a number of segments of the north creek greenway, a regional
trail, have been constructed throughout Farmington. a segment of
the grail exists along the north side of Farmington, running through
north creek Park, Jim Bell Park and Preserve, crossing csaH 64
via a tunnel underpass and continuing about a quarter mile south.
another segment exists through rambling river Park, alongside the
Vermillion river. another segment has been constructed along the
Vermillion river in empire township, east of Farmington city limits.
2-14
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
EUREKA TWP.
LAKEVILLE
EMPIRE TWP.
CASTLE
ROCK TWP.
NORTH C R E E K G R E EN W AY
V E R M I L L I ON
R I V E R G R E ENW AY
¬«66
¬«74
¬«64
¬«31
¬«50
¬«64
11TH ST
M E A D O W LARK
W
AY
213TH ST W
FLAGSTAFF AVE
19 3 RD STW
EATON AVE
U P PER 182N
DST W
180TH ST W
187TH S T W
190TH ST W
WALNUT ST
A
K
I
N
R
D
PINE ST
SPRUCE ST
WILLOW ST
6TH ST
224TH ST W
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
A
VE
FAIRVIEW
LN
13TH ST
206TH S T W
EGRET WAY
2ND ST
E
U
CLIDPAT
H
200THSTW
WILL
O
W
TRL
D O V E R D R
9TH ST
ENGLISH
A
V
E
EVENSONG AVE
HERITAGE WAY
199TH
STW
198TH ST W
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
PATH
E
V
E
R
E
S
T
P
A
T
H
DIVISION ST
UPPER 183RD ST W
MAPLE ST
EVERHIL L A V E
203RDS T W
185TH ST W
EC
H
O
DR
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
U
C
L
I
D
S
T
OAK ST
12TH ST
MAIN ST
CA M D EN
P
A
T
H
D
U
L
U
T
H
S
T
183RD S T W
E
MERALD T RL
EN
GLEWOO
D
W
A
Y
E
R
I
C
KSON
PAT H
LARCH ST
LOCUST ST
14TH ST
4TH ST
1ST ST
3RD
ST
5TH ST
ESCA
L
A
D
E
W
AY
EXPL
O
RERWAY
EV
ENING
STARWAY
D
U
N
B
A
R
AV
E
189TH ST W
DIA
MOND PATH
208TH ST W
E
M
PIRE TRL
KNUTSEN DR
CYPR
E
S
S
D
R
EVE N S TONDR
EXCALIB UR
T
RL
DYLAN DR
DU
P
ONT WAY
210TH ST W
220TH ST W
")3
")50
")3
Farm ington City Boundary
Parks
Public School Facilities
Dakota County Greenways
Existing
Alternate
Farmington Bike/Walk Facilities
Boardwalk
Bridge
Sidewalks (Pedestrian Only)
Natural Surface
Paved Trail
F00.5 10.25
Miles
Figure 2.6 Existing Facilities by Type
2-15 existing conditions
Examples of Facilities and Crossings
Designed for All Users level of Traffic Stress Analysis
Comfort levels of Biking
not all people have the same level of comfort when it comes to
bicycling. originally developed by roger geller at the city of
Portland (or) the “Four types of Bicyclists” (see Figure 2.7) are
meant to guide efforts in assessing what certain segments of a
population require or want in a bikeway facility. geller suggested
that most people can be categorized into the following four groups:
1. Strong and Fearless: People willing to bicycle with limited or no
bicycle-specific infrastructure
2. Enthusiastic and Confident: People willing to bicycle if some
bicycle-specific infrastructure is in place
3. Interested but Concerned: People willing to bicycle if high-
quality bicycle infrastructure is in place
4. Not able or Interested: People unwilling to bicycle even if high-
quality bicycle infrastructure is in place
these typologies help us identify which segments of the population
need lower stress facilities to try bicycling or to bicycle more often.
most cities find that as they build safer and more comfortable
bicycle facilities, the number of people bicycling increases. this is
due to the fact that one of the largest groups of bicyclists identify
as “interested but concerned” with biking. When bicycle facilities
are built to the needs of the “Interested but Concerned”, the results
of investment yield the highest number of users. additionally, when
more people start bicycling because of a more comfortable network,
biking becomes safer due, to the fact that motorists are more aware
of the bicyclists presence.
Level of Traffic Stress
riding a bicycle should not require bravery, courage, or expensive
specialized gear. Yet, this is often the perception among cyclists
and non-cyclists alike. For a bicycling network to attract the widest
2-16
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Figure 2.7 Four Types of Bicyclists in Farmington
STRONG AND FEARlESS ENTHUSIASTIC AND CONFIDENT
INTERESTED BUT CONCERNED NOT ABlE OR NOT INTERESTED
»Advanced,
confident rider
who is comfortable
riding in most traffic
situations
»Tend to have high
performance gear,
clothing
»Take the shortest
routes and seek
challenges
»Prefer to ride
separated from
pedestrians due to
higher speeds
»Comfortable sharing
the road with
vehicular traffic but
prefer bicycle lanes,
multi-use trails
»May choose to
bike for health,
environmental,
transportation or
recreation
»May or may not have
high performance
gear, clothing
»People who have no
current interest in biking
or physically unable to
ride a bicycle
»Often cite far distances,
weather, costs as reason
for not biking
»Improvements in local
facilities and networks,
encouragement and
education could help
make riding (or walking/
non-motorized travel) a
viable opportunity
»Prefer to take off-street paths or
low-volume residential streets
»Safety is a big concern for these
riders
»Don’t generally self-identify as
‘bicyclists’
»Largest potential for increases in
ridership
»Improvements in facilities and
networks would make riding a
viable, more comfortable option
10%34%9%47%
FOUR TyPES OF CyClISTS IN FARMINGTON:
Farmington residents were presented with
the four types of bicyclists concept as a part
of the community survey for the Farmington
Bicycle and Pedestrian plan. Survey
participants were then asked to categorize
themselves based on what type of cyclist
group they thought they belonged in.
Those results are displayed as percentages
in Figure 2.7. Those that classify themselves
as “Interested but Concerned” make up the
largest cohort. This trend is typical among
most cities in the US and indicates that as
more safe and comfortable bicycle and trail
facilities are built Farmington, the more
people will begin to try bicycling or bicycle
more often.
2-17 existing conditions
EUREKA TWP.
LAKEVILLE
EMPIRE TWP.
CASTLE
ROCK TWP.
¬«66
¬«74
¬«64
¬«31
¬«50
¬«64
11TH ST
M E A D O W LARK
W
AY
213TH ST W
FLAGSTAFF AVE
1 93 RD STW
EATON AVE
U PPER 182N
DST W
180TH ST W
187TH S T W
190TH ST W
WALNUT ST
A
K
I
N
R
D
PINE ST
SPRUCE ST
WILLOW ST
6TH ST
224TH ST W
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
A
VE
FAIRVIEW
LN
13TH ST
206TH S T W
EGRET WAY
2ND ST
E
U
CLIDPAT
H
200THSTW
WILL
O
W
TRL
D O V E R D R
9TH ST
ENGLISH
A
V
E
EVENSONG AVE
HERITAGE WAY
199TH
STW
198TH ST W
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
PATH
E
V
E
R
E
S
T
P
A
T
H
DIVISION ST
UPPER 183RD ST W
MAPLE ST
EVERHIL L A V E
203RDS T W
185TH ST W
EC
H
O
DR
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
U
C
L
I
D
S
T
OAK ST
12TH ST
MAIN ST
CA M D EN
P
A
T
H
D
U
L
U
T
H
S
T
183R D S T W
E
MERALD TRL
EN
GLEWOO
D
W
A
Y
E
R
I
CKSON
PAT H
LARCH ST
LOCUST ST
14TH ST
4TH ST
1ST ST
3RD ST
5TH ST
ESCA
L
A
D
E
W
AY
EXPL
O
RERWAY
E
V
ENING
STARWAY
D
U
N
B
A
R
AV
E
189TH ST W
DIAMOND PATH
208TH ST W
E
M
PIRE TRL
KNUTSEN DR
CYPR
E
S
S
D
R
EVE N S TON
DR
EXCALIB UR
T
RL
DYLAN DR
DUP
ONT WAY
210TH ST W
220TH ST W
")3
")50
")3
Farmington City Boundary
Parks
Public School Facilities
Level of Traffic Stress
1 High Comfort
2
3
4 Low Comfort
F00.5 10.25
Miles
Figure 2.8 Level of Traffic Stress Analysis (All Levels of Comfort)
2-18
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
possible segment of the population, there should be an excellent
network of ‘low stress’ routes. these routes provide separation,
through distance and/or physical barriers, between bicyclists and
vehicles and directly connect destinations. level of traffic stress
(lts) is an objective, data-driven approach to evaluating bikeways
by matching up roadway design, traffic volumes, and motor
vehicle speeds to individual perceptions of bicyclist comfort and
a willingness to travel out of ones’ way to maintain that level of
comfort. levels of traffic stress range from 1 to 4, and are defined as
follows:
»lts 1:
-Strong separation (physical barrier such as curb and distance
between bicyclist and vehicle) from all vehicles except low speed
(<25 mph), low volume traffic (<2,000 vehicles/day), even at
intersections
-Simple crossings (low traffic volumes, short crossing distance,
traffic control device present, low traffic speed)
-Demands little concentrated attention from cyclists and is
attractive enough for a relaxing bike ride
-Suitable for children and those who are “Interested but
Concerned”
»lts 2:
-Except in low speed / low volume traffic situations, cyclists have
their own place to ride that keeps them from having to interact
with traffic except at formal crossings
Figure 2.9 Criteria for Determining Level of Traffic Stress
DETERMINING THE lOw-STRESS BICyClE NETwORk:
Criteria adapted from “Low-Stress Bicycling
and Network Connectivity” by Mekuria,
Furth, and Nixon published by the Mineta
Transportation Institute were used to
perform the level of traffic stress analysis
for the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian
Plan. For a deeper dive into the criteria
developed in this report go to the link
below.
http://transweb.sjsu.edu/research/low-stress-
bicycling-and-network-connectivity
2-19 existing conditions
EUREKA TWP.
LAKEVILLE
EMPIRE TWP.
CASTLE
ROCK TWP.
¬«66
¬«74
¬«64
¬«31
¬«50
¬«64
11TH ST
M E A D O W LARK
W
AY
213TH ST W
FLAGSTAFF AVE
1 93 RD STW
EATON AVE
U PPER 182N
DST W
180TH ST W
187TH S T W
190TH ST W
WALNUT ST
A
K
I
N
R
D
PINE ST
SPRUCE ST
WILLOW ST
6TH ST
224TH ST W
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
A
VE
FAIRVIEW
LN
13TH ST
206TH S T W
EG RET WAY
2ND ST
E
U
CLIDPAT
H
200THSTW
WILL
O
W
TRL
D O V E R D R
9TH ST
ENGLISH
A
V
E
EVENSONG AVE
HERITAGE WA Y
199TH
STW
198TH ST W
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
PATH
E
V
E
R
E
S
T
P
A
T
H
DIVISION ST
UPPER 183RD ST W
MAPLE ST
EVERHIL L A V E
203RDS T W
185TH ST W
EC
H
O
DR
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
U
C
L
I
D
S
T
OAK ST
12TH ST
MAIN ST
CA M D EN
P
A
T
H
D
U
L
U
T
H
S
T
183RD S T W
E
MERALD TRL
EN
GLEWOO
D
W
A
Y
E
R
I
CKSON
PAT H
LARCH ST
LOCUST ST
14TH ST
4TH ST
1ST ST
3RD ST
5TH ST
ESCA
L
A
D
E
W
AY
EXPL
O
RERWAY
EVENING
STARWAY
D
U
N
B
A
R
AV
E
189TH ST W
DIA
MOND PATH
208TH ST W
E
M
PIRE TRL
KNUTSEN DR
CYPR
E
S
S
D
R
EVE N S TONDR
EXCALIBUR
T
RL
DYLAN DR
DUP
ONT WAY
210TH ST W
220TH ST W
")3
")50
")3
Farmington City Boundary
Parks
Public School Facilities
High Comfor t Network
Level of Traffic Stress
1 High Comfort
2-4 Other Levels of Comfort
Served by High Comfort Trail Facility (1 Block Distance)
Served by Other Level of Comfort Trail Facility (1 Block Distance)
F00.5 10.25
Miles
Figure 2.10 High Comfort Network Service Area
2-20
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
-Physical separation from higher speed and multi-lane traffic
-Crossings that are easy for an adult to negotiate, children with
help
-Demands more attention than might be expected from children
-A level of traffic stress that most adults can tolerate, particularly
those who are “Interested but Concerned”
»lts 3:
-Involves interaction with moderate speed or multi-lane traffic, or
close proximity to higher speed traffic
-A level of traffic stress acceptable to those classified as
“Enthusiastic and Confident” but still prefer having their own
dedicated space
»lts 4:
-Involves interaction with higher speed traffic or close proximity
to high speed traffic.
-A level of stress acceptable only to those who identify as “Strong
and Fearless”
table 2.7 breaks down Farmington’s existing bicycle network into
the four levels of traffic stress. of the 49.5 miles of bicycle and
pedestrian network in Farmington, 68% is classified as a high
comfort facility, made up of trails that are separated from high
volume roadways. displayed in Figure 2.8, the high comfort bicycle
network is spread throughout the city with the exception of the
older areas of Farmington around downtown where bike facilities
are absent. overall, approximately 21% of Farmington residents
live within one block (325 ft) of a trail. as observed in Figure 2.10,
when only accounting for the high comfort trail network, 17% of
Farmington residents are within one block (325 ft) of a facility.
a bicycle trip is only as comfortable as the most difficult intersection
crossing. Because of this, many of the trail segments in Farmington
that would have been classified as high comfort (lts 1) have been
downgraded to lts 2, lts 3 or lts 4, primarily because they cross
high volume and high speed roadways where there is little or no
protection from automobile traffic. crossing arterial roadways such
as Highway 3, Pilot knob road (county Highway 31), 195th street
(county Highway 64), and 212th street (county Highway 50) is
particularly dangerous and stressful for bicyclists and pedestrians;
trails that cross these roadways and run along side of them are
stressful as well.
ACCESS TO THE TRAIl NETwORk
21%
of Farmington
Residents live within
1 block of a trail
17%
of Farmington
Residents live within
1 block of the high
comfort trail network
Source: HKGi, US Census Block Group Data, Met
Council Generalized Land Use Data
Table 2.7 Level of Traffic Stress Analysis
LTS SCoRE LENGTH
(Mi)%
1 - High comfort 33.7 68%
2 12.6 25%
3 0.3 1%
4 - low comfort 2.9 6%
ToTAL 49.5 100%
Source: HKGi
2-21 existing conditions
EUREKA TWP.
LAKEVILLE
EMPIRE TWP.
CASTLE
ROCK TWP.
¬«66
¬«74
¬«64
¬«31
¬«50
¬«64
11TH ST
M E A D O W LARK
W
AY
213TH ST W
FLAGSTA
FF AVE
1 9 3 RD STW
EATON AVE
U PPER 182N
DST W
180TH ST W
187TH S T W
190TH ST W
WALNUT ST
A
K
I
N
R
D
PINE ST
SPRUCE ST
WILLOW ST
6TH ST
224TH ST W
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
A
VE
FAIRVIEW
LN
13TH ST
206TH S T W
EGRET WAY
2ND ST
E
U
CLIDPAT
H
200THSTW
WILL
O
W
TRL
D O V E R D R
9TH ST
ENGLISH
A
V
E
EVENSONG AVE
HERITAGE WAY
199TH
STW
198TH ST W
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
PATH
E
V
E
R
E
S
T
P
A
T
H
DIVISION ST
UPPER 183RD ST W
MAPLE ST
EVERHIL L A V E
203RDS T W
185TH ST W
EC
H
O
DR
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
U
C
L
I
D
S
T
OAK ST
12TH ST
MAIN ST
CA M D EN
P
A
T
H
D
U
L
U
T
H
S
T
183RD S T W
E
MERALD TRL
EN
GLEWOO
D
W
A
Y
E
R
I
CKSON
PAT H
LARCH ST
LOCUST ST
14TH ST
4TH ST
1ST ST
3RD ST
5TH ST
ESCA
L
A
D
E
W
AY
EXPLO
RERWAY
E
VENING
STARWAY
D
U
N
B
A
R
AV
E
189TH ST W
DIAMOND PATH
208TH ST W
E
M
PIRE TRL
KNUTSEN DR
CYPR
E
S
S
D
R
EVE N S TONDR
EXCALIBUR
T
RL
DYLAN DR
DUP
ONT WAY
210TH ST W
220TH ST W
")3
")50
")3
Farmington City Boundary
Parks
Public School Facilities
High Comfort Network
Level of Traffic Stress
1 High Comfort
2-4 Other Levels of Comfort
F00.5 10.25
Miles
High Comfort Islands* (Bicycle)
*For illustrative purposes only and do not
represent actual bicycle travelsheds.
Figure 2.11 High Comfort Network Service Area Islands
2-22
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
While the lts analysis doesn’t directly measure level of comfort
for pedestrians, bicyclists have more aspects in common with
pedestrians than they do motor vehicles and there pedestrians and
bicycle share many of the same planning needs. also, pedestrians
may benefit from the level of stress analysis because most bike
facilities in Farmington are multi-use facilities.
High Comfort Islands
taking into account high stress crossings, Farmington’s high comfort
bicycle network becomes less of a network and more of a series
of islands, isolated from other trail connections. Figure 2.11 shows
seven distinct high comfort islands that exist within Farmington.
many high quality loop trails exist for recreational bicycle riding
within these islands, but moving throughout the city by bicycle
becomes much more difficult and dangerous. a person living within
the blue high comfort island will feel comfortable biking anywhere
within the blue area, but will feel separated from the rest of the
bicycling network even though some stressful crossing exist. the
same is true for each of the other six islands.
some high comfort islands are larger than others, signifying a more
connected high comfort network. For example, the yellow high
comfort island is the largest of all the islands. there is a high comfort
crossing that exists underneath the 195th st. bridge at north creek.
Because of flooding and snow cover, this area may be difficult to
cross during spring and winter, separating the high comfort island
into multiple pieces. grade separated crossings increase safety in
areas like these, however, cost and site constraints limit viability in all
cases.
Figure 2.11 shows that most parks in Farmington are served by the
trail network. However, there are some parks that aren’t connected
to the full high comfort network. schools are generally connected
to a trail network, with the exception of Farmington High school.
However, only one school is connected to a high comfort network
(levi P dodge middle school in the purple island). schools, in
particular, should be targeted for connection to high comfort trail
networks, in order to best allow children to walk or ride to school.
some of the high comfort islands in Farmington exist adjacent
to each others. For example, the blue and red islands exist on
opposite sides of Pilot knob road and the orange island is adjacent
to the blue island on the other side of 195th st. Future improved
intersection or mid-block crossings could significantly combine these
areas to create one large high comfort island. larger high comfort
islands mean that people can safely and comfortably travel to more
destinations in Farmington by bike. When executed correctly, safety
improvements to bicycling infrastructure improves safety for walking
as well, especially at intersections.
While many of the trails in Farmington are
classified as high comfort facilities, the roads they
have to cross make them feel more stressful.
2-23 existing conditions
Figure 2.12 Social Pinpoint Community Feedback
2-24
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Community Engagement Phase 1
community engagement uses community voices to influence and
shape the planning process. a robust community engagement
process paves the way for community support for the final
plan and makes implementation of plan elements easier. this
section highlights the comments of community members as they
participated in the variety of community engagement opportunities
throughout the planning process.
Social Pinpoint
social Pinpoint is a map-based online engagement tool that allows
community members to leave comments on specific areas of the
city via a map. Participants are then able to interact with each other,
by ‘liking’ or ‘disliking’ other comments, or replying directly into a
comment thread.
social Pinpoint was used during the first phase of community
engagement to identify areas in the city where:
»people currently or would like to bike and walk to,
»gaps in the bikeway and/or sidewalk network exist,
»speeding is a common issue,
»people feel unsafe while trying to cross the road as a bicyclist or
pedestrian, and
»segments of existing trails or sidewalks that need to be replaced
in total, social Pinpoint was open for comment for two months from
december 2018 to February 2019. over this period of time, 389
unique users visited the website, 174 comments were left by 50
people, and an average time of 14.5 minutes spent on the site by
visitors.
locations of comments gathered from social Pinpoint are shown in
Figure 2.12. the largest number of comments provided identified
dangerous crossings. the majority of these comments were placed
along the arterial roadways that run through Farmington, mainly
Highway 3, Pilot knob road (county Highway 31), 195th street
(county Highway 64), and 212th street (county Highway 50).
Participants indicated that Farmington schools and downtown
Farmington were two of the most desired destinations to walk and
bike to. currently, there is a large bike network gap in and around
downtown and many schools lack high comfort biking and walking
facilities.
Figure 2.13 Social Pinpoint Comments
Gathered by Category
SPEEDING TRAFFIC
POOR TRAIL /
SIDEWALK
CONDITIONS
BIKEWAY /
SIDEWALK GAP
BIKE / WALK
DESTINATIONS
DANGEROuS
CROSSINGS
2-25 existing conditions
Figure 2.14 How Often do Survey Respondents Bike and/or Walk for
Recreational and Transportation Reasons
25%
52%
11%
12%
5%
14%
11%
71%
Daily
1-3 Times a Week
Once a Month
Never
Exercise/
Recreation
Transportation
Trips
TRANSPORTATION TRIPS:
Transportation trips can be classified as
all trips whose primary purpose isn’t for
exercise and recreation and are destination
focused. Examples of transportation trips
include trips to:
»visit friends/family
»shopping/run errands
»restaurants, bars, and other
entertainment
»cultural, religious, or community events
»work
»school
»make connections with transit
Online Survey
another way the community was engaged was through an online
survey on survey monkey. the survey consisted of 11 questions and
focused on individual preferences regarding biking and walking as
well as what respondents thought of Farmington’s current and future
bike/walk network. in total, the survey was open for collection for 2
months from december 2018 to February 2019 and there were 650
responses recorded. a summary of the survey is highlighted below.
When survey respondents were asked how often they bike or walk
for exercise/recreational purposes vs. transportation purposes
(Figure 2.14) respondents indicated that they walk and bike for
recreational and exercise purposes far more often than they do
for transportation purposes. this may be, in part, due to the fact
that the current sidewalk and trail system in Farmington lends itself
to being more of a recreational based network due to the limited
connectivity as discussed earlier in the level of traffic stress analysis.
similar to the results received via the online mapping tool, survey
respondents feel that the most important destinations that they
would like to bike and walk to are parks, schools, and other
residential areas.
in the survey Farmington residents were presented with the four
types of bicyclists concept, survey participants were then asked to
categorize themselves based on what type of cyclist group they
thought they belonged in. those results are presented earlier in the
chapter in Figure 2.7 on page 2-17.
survey participants were asked “What keeps you from walking or
2-26
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
TOP 5 BARRIERS TO BIkING AND wAlkING IN FARMINGTON
1
2
3
4
5
icy/snowy trails and sidewalks
destinations are too Far apart
Feel unsafe at road crossings
Feel unsafe near traffic
trails and sidewalks are
incomplete
Source: Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
Survey, February 2019
Farmington Parks and Recreation Staff gather
ideas from residents at the Farmington
Community Expo, January 2019. Source: HKGi
biking more in Farmington?” the top responses include:
»my destinations are too far apart
»there are no trails or sidewalks where i want to go
»i don’t feel safe walking or biking near motorized traffic
»i don’t feel safe crossing busy intersections
»trails and sidewalks are too icy or snowy in the winter months
»trails and sidewalks are lacking lighting
With the exception of ‘my destinations are too far apart’ all of
these identified barriers to walking and biking in Farmington can
be addressed through improved network connections, intersection
improvements, trail amenities and year-round maintenance.
When asked how willing residents are to supporting a tax increase
or referendum to fund future bicycle and pedestrian facilities in
Farmington, the responses were varied. a weighted average showed
that fewer than half of residents would support these measures.
an open-ended question solicited general ideas from survey
participants to improve conditions for biking and walking in
Farmington. over two hundred ideas were shared, which shows the
support and dedication of Farmington residents to improving the
existing network and conditions for biking and walking.
Bike + Ped Plan (BPP) Committee
a Bike + Ped Plan committee was formed to serve an advisory role
during the planning process. this group was formed by the Parks
and recreation department, and a robust effort was made to include
representatives from a variety of interest groups and perspectives on
the committee.
over the course of the plan process, the Bike + Ped Plan committee
met three times. committee members were tasked with providing
input and ideas during key points during the plan process, as well as
assisting with outreach and community engagement efforts.
Open House at the Community Expo
a community open house was hosted in conjunction with the
Farmington community expo in January of 2019. this was an
opportunity for people to interact one-on-one with the plan
consultant and Parks and recreation director, to share ideas,
concerns and ask questions about the Bike + Ped Plan. Hundreds
of people attended the community expo, and approximately 55
people stopped by the Bike + Ped Plan booth to share their ideas.
Community Engagement Phase 2
2-27 existing conditions
community engagement Phase 1 centered around gathering
information from the community about their ideas, thoughts,
and concerns on the future of walking and biking in Farmington,
From this information, the draft network Plan and system
recommendations were created, with guidance from city staff and
the BPP committee, as well as through collaboration with dakota
county and mndot.
in april of 2019, community engagement Phase 2 was launched.
this effort focused on sharing the draft plan with the community
and interested stakeholders and gathering feedback on the draft
network Plan and system recommendations. With this feedback,
this draft document was revised and the implementation Plan was
created.
community engagement Phase 2 consisted of a public open house,
an online survey, and a joint council Work session.
Public Open House
to officially launch the draft Plan, an public open house was held at
Farmington city Hall on thursday, april 25th. this open house was
advertised through social media, word-of-mouth through the BPP
committee, and through city electronic communications.
the open house featured presentation boards that outlined the
plan process, results from the previous phase of community
engagement, existing conditions, the draft network Plan and system
recommendations. Participants were asked to provide specific
feedback on the boards or through comment cards.
Because attendance at the open house was low, the presentation
boards were displayed in the lobby of city Hall for two weeks to
allow more people the ability to view and comment.
2-28
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Public Open House at City Hall as part of Community Engagement Phase 2
Online Survey
an online survey was conducted in coordination with the open
House and launch of the draft Plan. the survey was advertised
alongside the public open house.
community members were encouraged to visit a web link to view
the draft Plan and system recommendations and weigh in on
how much they support the goals and system recommendations.
Participants were also asked to provide general comments and
feedback about the plan.
148 people participated in the online survey, which was open for
two weeks. in general, people expressed support for the ideas
presented, and gave specific suggestions to improve wording and
legibility of the plan.
Joint Council work Session
a joint council Work session was hosted at city Hall to present
the draft Plan, system recommendations, and in-progress
implementation Plan to the city council, Planning commission, and
Parks and recreation advisory committee. members of the BPP
committee were invited, as well as the general public.
Participants were invited to engage in discussion and provide written
feedback to the project team, which helped to inform final revisions
of the draft Plan.
2-29 existing conditions
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
CHAPTER 3
Network Plan
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-2 System Goals
3-2 Draft Network Plan
3-4 Network Plan Elements
3-9 Intersection Treatments
3-11 System Recommendations
3-1 netWork Plan
3-2
System Goals
the following goals provide direction for the overall bicycle and
pedestrian network in Farmington. the goals are broad statements
that are meant to be a guide for decision makers when vetting future
city projects, policies, and programs.
Goal 1
design, construct and maintain a comfortable, safe,
and connected bicycle and pedestrian network
suitable for those who are ‘interested but concerned’
and considerate of people of all ages and ability
levels in Farmington.
Goal 2
Building off of the existing system, improve
conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists to connect
to key community destinations such as parks, trails,
schools, civic and commercial areas.
Goal 3
make biking and walking a viable choice for
transportation within Farmington, as well as for
recreational purposes to encourage an active and
healthy lifestyle.
Draft Network Plan
the draft network Plan builds off of the existing trail and sidewalk
network, and identifies priority segments that will improve
connections throughout Farmington. the Plan shows:
»connector trails
»neighborhood trails
»sidewalks
»greenways
»on-street Bikeways
»intersection treatments
the following pages provide detailed descriptions and
recommendations for the network plan elements and intersection
treatments as shown on the draft network Plan.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-3 netWork Plan
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
G L A D S T O N ETRL
BRENN
AN PATH
FESTAL AVE
FIELDCREST AVE
MEA D O W L A R K W A Y
225TH ST W
ASTERBILTLN
205TH ST W
193RDSTW
DUSHANE PKWY
179TH ST W
COUNTRY VIEW TRL
ELK RIVERTRL
EATON AVE
190TH ST W
170TH ST W
181ST STW
UPPER 182N D ST W
173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
A
KI
N
R
D
ABBEY
LN
EC
H
O LN
CENTENNIAL DR
CANTON CT
DUNBURY K N L
FLAGSTAFF AVE
GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY
ERIN CT
224TH ST W
DREAMLN
223RD ST W
GEMINI TRL
BRUTUS DR
DYNAMICDR
CLAIRECT
EA G L E WOOD TRL
E
A
S
T
VIE
W
A
V
E
EUROPA
A
V
E
FAIRVIEW LN
ERIN
WAY
FALCON
PATH
EAGLE LN
SUNNYSID
E
DR
13TH ST
PRAIRIE VIE W TRL
206THSTW
CASC A DEDR
EGRET WAY
CHESTERFIELD WAY
FAIRMEADOW WAY
212THSTW
FOXBOROLN
PARKDR
GERDINE PATH
202ND STW
FORMOSA AVE
EU
C
LID PA
T
H
CAMROSE WAY
200TH ST W
FAIRHAVEN AVE
GANDERLN
GAGE AVE
EASTON AVE
FORTUNETRL
204TH ST W
W
TRL
ALLAS AVE
EASTWOOD AVE
DOVER
DR
ELGIN AVE
EASTLAKE DR
ENGLISH AVE
DRAFTHO RSE BLVD
EVENSONGAVE
EUREKA AVE
FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR
CALGARYTRL
GLANSHAW AVE
F O L S O M P A T H
SHAKESPEARE BLVD
ROBINLN
GATEWAYDR
FRAZERPATH
FLINT AVE
D U LCIMERCT
198TH ST W
199THSTW
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
A
T
H
175TH ST W
FIRELIGH T W A Y
EVERESTPATH
FRANCHISE WAY
UPPER 183RD ST W
HERITAGE WAY
EVERHILLAVE
EXC
EPTIO
N
A
L
T
R
L
FLUSHINGHILLSC T
ENFIELD WAY
FIVE OAKS DR
FINESSE TRL
FAIRHILLAVE
203RDSTW
F
R
E
E
P
O
R
TWAY
185TH ST W
CLAREMONTDR
EVENFALL AVE
FAIRFAXAVE
ELKWOOD AVE
ECHO TER
ECHO DR
ELLICE LN
DUNBURY AVE
EVELETH CT
EVELETH AVE
EMBERS AVE
GEORGE T O W N W AY
CAR ME L T R L
EUC
LI
D
S
T
FIR
ESI
D
E
L
N
C E NTERFIE
L
D
CT
E
X
C
H
ANGETRL
188TH ST W
B U T T E R N U T T R L
GLA
CIER
W
A
Y
CA
M
D
EN
P
A
TH
E
M
B
RY
LN
EN
C
H
A
N
TED
WAY
D
U
L
U
T
H S
T
174TH ST W
E X C E L C T
183RDST W
191STST W
ESQUIRE WAY
FRENCH AVE
DE
NALI CT
B U R L IN G T O N PATH
EV
E
R
GR
E
E
N
T
R
L
178TH ST W
FOREST ST
EMERALD TRL
CATTAIL LN
CANBYCT
F ORFARCT
GL
A
S
G
O
W
A
V
E
EN
G
L
E
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
FARADAY LN
ENCINA PATH
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
RD
CHANDLE
R
A
V
E
FOLIAGE AVE
FIREBIRD CT
169TH ST W
197TH ST W
EVEREST TRL
DUL U T H CIR
F
URY
CT
EXCELSIOR LN
ERICKSON
P
AT
H
184TH ST W
EVERT
O
N
C
T
FULDA TRL
ARBOR LN
GALLECT
EWING ST
198TH CT W
EX
O
D
U
S
A
VE
ELM ST
14TH ST
FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOWWAY
DOVER CT
LOWERHERITAGEWAY
CABRILLA WAY
DUNCA
N
C
IR
CAMDENCT
E
S
C
A
L
A
D
E
W
AY
ELLINGTON TRL
EUREKACT
C
AN
AR
Y PAT
H
CASTLECT
ROMEO DR
JULIET DR
MACBETH CIR
DUNCAN CT
FALCONAVE
FIELDFARE WAY
201ST ST W
F O RMOSACT
CENTURYCT
GOLDFIN
C
H
DR
C
A
R
AV
EL
CT
FONTINA PATH
ENCORE CT
CANTREL WAY
GARRIS
O
N
LN
GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL
CATTA
IL
CT
B
EAUMONTAVE
ELY AVE
E
N
RI
G
H
T W
A
Y
EDMONTON AVE
EXETER AVE
DENALI WAY
ELMWOOD
CI
R
186TH ST W
E N R IGHTCT
172ND ST W
E
S
C
O
R
T T
R
L
EXP
L
ORER
WAY
CAMBRIA CT
EVENINGSTARWAY
EAGLEVIEW LN
FROST CT
D
UN
B
A
R
AV
E
UPPER179TH ST W
CALHOUN CT
ETHELTON AVE
189TH ST W
EUCLID AVE
E
MPEROR CT
EXIRA AVE
DIAMOND PATH
EAVESWAY
FIESTAAVE
ENHANCE
CT
CAESAR ST
ENGLISHCT
ENIGMAWAY
203RD C T W
FIRESTONEWAY
211TH ST W
LANGFORDLN
CAMBODIA AVE
EMPIRETRL
BISCAYNE AVE
220TH
ST
W
F
O
N
T
A
N
A P
A
T
H
LOWER 183RD ST W
DESMO N D CT
KNUTSEN DR
UPPER 204TH ST W
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
DR
EXLEY AVE
FINCH PATH
CLEO PATRAD
R
177TH ST W
EUCLID WAY
F
RUITWOOD
PATH
210TH ST W
E
S
S
E
N
C
E
T
R
L
GALERY DR
FAIR ISLE PATH
DULANEYDR
EXPORT TRL
FAIRMONT AVE
EVENSTONDR
EXCALIBUR TRL
EVENINGTER
192ND ST W
CANTON CIR
GAGE WAY
176TH ST W
TWINPONDCIR
194TH ST W
ESTES PATH
E
X
E
C
U
TIVE
PATH
EXCLUSIVE PATH
DYLAN DR
NORTH CREEK LN
CHEVELLE AVE
CHILI AVE
FIELDIN G WAY
D
A
W
S
O
N L
N
LOWER 182ND ST W
G ET TY SB U R G WAY
ELDORADO WAY
D
E
V
R
IE
PATH
EASTOAKSDR
COLORADO AVED
YERSPASS
MUNICIPALD R
ESTATEAVE
GARCIA WAY
TAMAR ACK TRL
E
M
B
R
Y A
V
E
ELKRIDGE TRL
196TH ST W
DUPONT WAY
EQUINOXAVE
FAIRGREEN AVE
BEAUMONT
WAY
A NTHONYDR
ESSEX AVE
BERRING AVE
230TH ST W
220TH ST W
H AMLET
CIR
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
LAKEVILLE
EUREKA TOWNSHIP
HILL DEE PARK
DAISY
KNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVE
PARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVER
PARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
ESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILL
PARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLE
CREEK
PARK
SCHMITZ
MAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEW
PARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACKPARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTH
CREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIE
PINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y
A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
E
VERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DE
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
A
B C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
CS
A
H
3
1
/
P
I
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
CR 64/ 195th ST W
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
185TH ST W
C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W
KEY
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
EXISTING GREENWAYS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)
PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS
WATER
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/3/19
0 10.5
Miles
DRAFT 5/13/19
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
GLADSTONETRL
BRENN
ANPATH
FESTAL AVEFIELDCREST AVE
MEADOWLARKWAY
225TH ST W
ASTERBILTLN
205TH ST W
193RDSTW
DUSHANE PKWY
179TH ST W
COUNTRYVIEWTRL
ELKRIVERTRL
EATON AVE
190TH ST W
170TH ST W
181STSTW
UPPER 182ND ST W
173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
A
K
IN
R
D
ABBEY
LN
EC
H
O L
N
CENTENNIAL DR
CANTON CT
DUNBURYKNL
FLAGSTAFF AVE
GALLEONCIREVENTIDE WAY
ERIN CT
224TH ST W
DREAMLN
223RD ST W
GEMINITRL
BRUTUS DR
DYNAMICDR
CLAIRE
CT
EAGLEWOODTRL
E
A
S
T
VI
E
W
A
V
E
EUROPA
A
V
E
FAIRVIEW LN
ERIN
WAY
FALCON
PATH
EAGLE LN
SUNNYS
I
D
E
DR
13TH ST
PRAIRIEVIE W TRL
206THSTW
CAS C A DEDR
EGRET WAY
CHESTERFIELD WAY
FAIRMEADOW WAY
212THSTW
FOXBOROLN
PARKDR
GERDINE PATH
202ND ST W
FORMOSAAVE
EUCLI
D PATH
CAMROSEWAY
200TH ST W
FAIRHAVEN AVE
GANDER
LN
GAGE AVE
EASTON AVE
FORTUNETRL
204TH ST W
W
TRL
ALLAS AVE
EASTWOOD AVE
DOVER
DR
ELGIN AVE
EASTLAKEDR
ENGLISH AVE
DRAFTHORSEBLVD
EVENSONGAVE
EUREKA AVE
FIRESTONEPATHEAGLEVIEW DR
CALGARYTRL
GLANSHAW AVE
FOLSOM PATH
SHAKESPEARE BLVD
ROBINLN
GATEWAY
DR
FRAZERPATH
FLINT AVE
DULCIMERCT
198TH ST W
199THSTW
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
A
T
H
175TH ST W
FIRELIGHTWAY
EVERESTPATH
FRANCHISE WAY
UPPER 183RD ST W
HERITAGE WAY
EVERHILLAVE
EX
C
EPTIO
N
A
L
T
R
L
FLUSHINGHILLSCT
ENFIELD WAYFIVEOAKSDR
FINESSE TRL
FAIRHILLAVE
203RDSTW
FREEPORTWAY
185TH ST W
CLAREMONTDR
EVENFALL AVE
FAIRFAXAVE
ELKWOOD AVE
ECHO TER
ECHO DR
ELLICE LN
DUNBURY AVE
EVELETH CT
EVELETH AVE
EMBERS AVE
GEORGETOWNWAY
CAR ME L T R L
EUC
L
ID
S
T
FIRESIDELN
C E NTERFIE
L
D
CT
E
X
C
H
ANGETRL
188TH ST W
B U T T E R N U T T R L
GLACIERWAY
CA
M
DEN
PA
T
H
EM
BR
Y
LN
EN
C
H
A
N
TED
WAY
D
U
L
U
T
H ST
174TH ST W
EXCEL CT
183RDSTW
191STSTW
ESQUIRE WAY
FRENCH AVE
DEN
ALI CT
B U R LI N G T O N PAT H
EVER
GR
E
E
N
T
R
L
178TH ST W
FOREST ST
EMERALD TRL
CATTAIL LN
CANBYCT
FORFARCT
GL
A
S
G
O
W
A
V
E
E
N
G
L
E
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
FARADAY LNENCINA PATH
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
RD
CHANDLER
A
V
E
FOLIAGE AVE
FIREBIRD CT
169TH ST W
197TH ST W
EVEREST TRL
DULUTHCIR
FU
R
Y
CT
EXCELSIOR LN
ERICKSO
N
PA
T
H
184TH ST W
EVERT
O
N
C
T
FULDA TRL
ARBOR LN
GALLECT
EWING ST
198TH CT W
EX
O
D
U
S
A
V
E
ELM ST
14TH ST
FIREBIRDPATHGLASGOWWAY
DOVER CT
LOWER HERITAGEWAY
CABRILLA WAY
DUNCA
N
C
IR
CAMDENCT
E
S
C
A
L
A
D
E
W
AY
ELLINGTON TRL
EUREKACT
C
A
N
A
RY
PAT
H
CASTLECT
ROMEO DR
JULIET DR
MACBETH CIR
DUNCAN CT
FALCONAVE
FIELDFARE WAY
201ST ST W
FORMOSACT
CENTURYCT
GOLD
F
INCH
DR
C
A
R
A
V
E
L
CT
FONTINA PATH
ENCORE CT
CANTREL WAY
GARR
IS
O
N
LN
GANNON WAYFLORIN AVEFIRTREEPL
CATTA
IL
CT
BEAUMONTAVE
ELY AVE
E
N
R
IG
H
T
W
A
Y
EDMONTON AVE
EXETER AVE
DENALI WAY
ELMWOOD
CI
R
186TH ST W
ENRIGHTCT
172ND ST W
E
S
C
O
R
T T
R
L
EXP
L
ORER
WAY
CAMBRIA C T
EVENING
STARWAY
EAGLEVIEW LN
FROST CT
D
UN
B
A
R A
V
E
UPPER179THSTW
CALHOUN CT
ETHELTON AVE
189TH ST W
EUCLID AVE
E
MPERORCT
EXIRA AVE
DIAMOND PATH
EAVESWAY
FIESTAAVE
E
NHANCE
C
T
CAESAR ST
ENGLISHCT
ENIGMAWAY
203RDCTW
FIRESTONEWAY
211TH ST W
LANGFORDLN
CAMBODIA AVE
EMPIRETRL
BISCAYNE AVE
220TH
ST
W
FONTANA PATH
LOWER 183RD ST W
DESMONDCT
KNUTSEN DR
UPPER 204TH ST W
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
D
R
EXLEY AVE
FINCH PATH
CLEOPATRAD
R
177TH ST W
EUCLIDWAY
F
R
UITWOOD
PATH
210TH ST W
E
S
SE
N
C
E
T
R
L
GALERY DR
FAIR ISLE PATH
DULANEYDR
EXPORT TRL
FAIRMONT AVE
EVENSTONDR
EXCALIBUR TRL
EVENINGTER
192ND ST W
CANTON CIR
GAGE WAY176TH ST W
TWIN PONDCIR
194TH ST W
ESTES PATH
E
X
E
CU
TIVE
PATH
EXCLUSIVE PATH
DYLAN DR
NORTH CREEK LN
CHEVELLE AVE
CHILI AVE
FIELDINGWAY
D
A
W
S
O
N L
N
LOWER 182ND ST W
GETTYSBURGWAY
ELDORADO WAY
D
E
V
R
I
E
P
ATH
EASTOAKS
DR
COLORADO AVED
YERSPASS
MUN
ICIPALDR
ESTATE
AVE
GARCIAWAY
TAMARACKTRL
E
M
B
R
Y
A
V
E
ELKRIDGE TRL
196TH ST W
DUPONT WAY
EQUINOXAVE
FAIRGREEN AVE
BEAUMONT
WAY
ANTHONYDR
ESSEX AVE
BERRING AVE
230TH ST W
220TH ST W
HAMLET
CIR
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
LAKEVILLE
EUREKA TOWNSHIP
HILL DEE PARK
DAISY
KNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVE
PARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVER
PARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
ESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILL
PARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLE
CREEK
PARK
SCHMITZ
MAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEW
PARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTH
CREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIE
PINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y
A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERHILL AVE
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
193RD 193RD ST W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
UPPER 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DE
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
LAKE MARION GREENWAY
A
BC
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
CS
A
H
3
1
/
P
I
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
CR 64/ 195th ST W
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
185TH ST W
CR 64 / 195TH ST W
KEY
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
EXISTING GREENWAYS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)
PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS
WATER
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/3/19
0 10.5
Miles
DRAFT 5/13/19
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
G L A D S T O N ETRL
BRENNANPATH
FESTAL AVE
FIELDCREST AVE
MEA D O W L A R K W AY
225TH ST W
ASTERBILTLN
205TH ST W
193RDSTW
DUSHANE PKWY
179TH ST W
COUNTRYVIEWTRL
ELK RIVER TRL
EATON AVE
190TH ST W
170TH ST W
181ST STW
UPPER 182N D ST W
173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
A
KI
N
R
D
ABBEY
LN
EC
H
O LN
CENTENNIAL DR
CANTON CT
DUNBURY KN L
FLAGSTAFF AVE
GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY
ERIN CT
224TH ST W
DREAMLN
223RD ST W
GEMINI TRL
BRUTUS DR
DYNAMIC DR
CLAIRECT
EA G L E WOOD TRL
E
A
S
T
VI
E
W
A
V
E
EUROPA
AV
E
FAIRVIEW LN
ERIN
WAY
FALCON
PATH
EAGLE LN
SUNNYSID
E
DR
13TH ST
PRAIRIE VIEW TRL
206THSTW
CASC A DEDR
EGRET WAY
CHESTERFIELD WAY
FAIRMEADOW WAY
212THSTW
FOXBOROLN
PARKDR
GERDINE PATH
202NDST W
FORMOSA AVE
EU
CLID PATH
CAMROSEWAY
200TH ST W
FAIRHAVEN AVE
GANDERLN
GAGE AVE
EASTON AVE
FORTUNE TRL
204TH ST W
W
TRL
ALLAS AVE
EASTWOOD AVE
DOVER
DR
ELGIN AVE
EASTLAKE D R
ENGLISH AVE
DRAFTHO RSE BLVD
EVENSONGAVE
EUREKA AVE
FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR
CALGARYTRL
GLANSHAW AVE
F O L S O M P A T H
SHAKESPEARE BLVD
ROBINLN
GATEWAYDR
FRAZERPATH
FLINT AVE
D ULCIMERCT
198TH ST W
199THSTW
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
A
T
H
175TH ST W
FIRELIGH T W A Y
EVERESTPATH
FRANCHISE WAY
UPPER 183RD ST W
HERITAGE WAY
EVERHILLAVE
EXCEPTIO
N
A
L
T
R
L
FLUSHINGHILLSC T
ENFIELD WAY
FIVE OAKSDR
FINESSE TRL
FAIRHILLAVE
203RDSTW
F
R
E
E
P
O
R
TWAY
185TH ST W
CLAREMONTDR
EVENFALL AVE
FAIRFAX
AVE
ELKWOOD AVE
ECHO TER
ECHO DR
ELLICE LN
DUNBURY AVE
EVELETH CT
EVELETH AVE
EMBERS AVE
GEORG E T O W N W AY
CAR ME L T R L
E
UC
LID
S
T
FIRESIDELN
C E NTERFIE
L
D
CT
E
X
C
H
ANGETRL
188TH ST W
B U T T E R N U T T R L
GLA
CIE
R
W
A
Y
CA
M
D
E
N
P
A
TH
E
M
B
RY
LN
EN
C
H
A
N
TED
WAY
D
U
L
U
T
H S
T
174TH ST W
E X C E L C T
183RD ST W
191STSTW
ESQUIRE WAY
FRENCH AVE
DE
NALI CT
B U R L IN G T O N PATH
EV
E
R
G
R
E
EN
T
R
L
178TH ST W
FOREST ST
EMERALD TRL
CATTAIL LN
CANBYCT
F ORFARCT
GL
A
S
G
O
W
AV
E
EN
G
LE
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
FARADAY LN ENCINA PATH
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
RD
CHANDLER
A
V
E
FOLIAGE AVE
FIREBIRD CT
169TH ST W
197TH ST W
EVEREST TRL
DUL U T H CIR
FURY
CT
EXCELSIOR LN
ERICKSON
P
AT
H
184TH ST W
EV
ERT
O
N
CT
FULDA TRL
ARBOR LN
GALLECT
EWING ST
198TH CT W
E
X
O
D
U
S
A
V
E
ELM ST
14TH ST
FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOW
WAY
DOVER CT
LOWER HERITAGE WAY
CABRILLA WAY
DUNCA
N
C
IR
CAMDENCT
E
S
C
A
L
A
D
E
W
AY
ELLINGTON TRL
EUREKACT
CA
NAR
Y PAT
H
CASTLECT
ROMEO DR
JULIET DR
MACBETH CIR
DUNCAN CT
FALCONAVE
FIELDFARE WAY
201ST ST W
F O RMOSA CT
CENTURYCT
GO
L
DFIN
C
H
DR
C
A
R
AV
EL
CT
FONTINA PATH
ENCORE CT
CANTREL WAY
GARR
I
S
O
N
LN
GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL
CATTA
I
L
CT
BEAUMONTAVE
ELY AVE
E
N
R
IG
H
T W
A
Y
EDMONTON AVE
EXETER AVE
DENALI WAY
ELMWOOD
CI
R
186TH ST W
E N R IGHTCT
172ND ST W
E
S
C
O
R
T
T
R
L
EXP
L
O
RER
WAY
CAMBRIA CT
EVENINGSTARWAY
EAGLEVIEW LN
FROST CT
D
U
N
B
A
R
A
V
E
UPPER 179TH ST W
CALHOUN CT
ETHELTON AVE
189TH ST W
EUCLID AVE
E
MPEROR CT
EXIRA AVE
DIAMOND PATH
EAVESWAY
FIESTAAVE
E
NHANCE
C
T
CAESAR ST
ENGLISH C T
ENIGMAWAY
203RD C T W
FIRESTONEWAY
211TH ST W
LANGFORDLN
CAMBODIA AVE
EMPIRE
TRL
BISCAYNE AVE
220TH
ST
W
FONTANA PA
T
H
LOWER 183RD ST W
DESMON D CT
KNUTSEN DR
UPPER 204TH ST W
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
D
R
EXLEY AVE
FINCH PATH
CLEO PATRA
D
R
177TH ST W
EUCLID WAY
F
R
UITWOOD
PATH
210TH ST W
E
S
S
E
N
C
E
T
R
L
GALERY DR
FAIR ISLE PATH
DULANEY DR
EXPORT TRL
FAIRMONT AVE
EVENSTONDR
EXCALIBUR TRL
EVENINGTER
192ND ST W
CANTON CIR
GAGE WAY
176TH ST W
TWINPONDCIR
194TH ST W
ESTES PATH
E
X
E
C
UTIVE
PA
TH
EXCLUSIVE PATH
DYLAN DR
NORTH CREEK LN
CHEVELLE AVE
CHILI AVE
FIELDING WAY
D
A
W
S
O
N L
N
LOWER 182ND ST W
G ETTY S B U R G WAY
ELDORADO WAY
D
E
V
R
IE
P
ATH
EASTOAKS
DR
COLORADO AVED
Y
ERSPASS
MUNICIPALD R
ESTATEAVE
GARCIA WAY
TAMARACK TRL
E
M
B
R
Y AV
E
ELKRIDGE TRL
196TH ST W
DUPONT WAY
EQUINOXAVE
FAIRGREEN AVE
BEAUMONTWAY
A NTHONYDR
ESSEX AVE
BERRING AVE
230TH ST W
220TH ST W
H AMLET
CIR
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
LAKEVILLE
EUREKA TOWNSHIP
HILL DEE PARK
DAISY
KNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVE
PARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVER
PARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
ESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILL
PARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLE
CREEK
PARK
SCHMITZ
MAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEW
PARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTH
CREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIE
PINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MI LLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y
A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DE
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
A
B C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
CS
A
H
3
1
/
P
I
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
CR 64/ 195th ST W
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
185TH ST W
C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W
KEY
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
EXISTING GREENWAYS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)
PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS
WATER
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/3/19
0 10.5
Miles
DRAFT 5/13/19
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
G L A D S T O N ETRL
BRENNAN PATH
FESTAL AVE
FIELDCREST AVE
ME A D O W L A R K W A Y
225TH ST W
ASTERBILTLN
205TH ST W
193RDSTW
DUSHANE PKWY
179TH ST W
COUNTRYVIEW TRL
ELK RIVER TRL
EATON AVE
190TH ST W
170TH ST W
181ST STW
UPPER 182ND ST W
173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
A
KI
N
R
D
ABBEY
LN
EC
H
O LN
CENTENNIAL DR
CANTON CT
DUNBURY KNL
FLAGSTAFF AVE
GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY
ERIN CT
224TH ST W
DREAMLN
223RD ST W
GEMINI TRL
BRUTUS DR
DYNAMIC DR
CLAIRECT
E A G L E WOOD TRL
E
A
S
T
VI
E
W
A
V
E
EUROPA
AV
E
FAIRVIEW LN
ERIN
WAY
FALCON
PATH
EAGLE LN
SUNNYSID
E
DR
13TH ST
PRAIRIEVIE W TRL
206THSTW
CASC A DEDR
EGRET WAY
CHESTERFIELD WAY
FAIRMEADOW WAY
212THSTW
FOXBOROLN
PARKDR
GERDINE PATH
202ND ST W
FORMOSAAVE
EU
CLID PATH
CAMROSEWAY
200TH ST W
FAIRHAVEN AVE
GANDERLN
GAGE AVE
EASTON AVE
FORTUNE TRL
204TH ST W
W
TRL
ALLAS AVE
EASTWOOD AVE
DOVER
DR
ELGIN AVE
EASTLAKE D R
ENGLISH AVE
DRAFTHO R SE BLVD
EVENSONGAVE
EUREKA AVE
FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR
CALGARYTRL
GLANSHAW AVE
F O L S O M P A T H
SHAKESPEARE BLVD
ROBINLN
GATEWAYDR
FRAZERPATH
FLINT AVE
D U LCIMERCT
198TH ST W
199THSTW
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
A
T
H
175TH ST W
FIRELIGH T W A Y
EVERESTPATH
FRANCHISE WAY
UPPER 183RD ST W
HERITAGE WAY
EVERHILLAVE
EXCEPTIO
N
A
L
T
R
L
FLUSHINGHILLSC T
ENFIELD WAY
FIVE OAKSDR
FINESSE TRL
FAIRHILLAVE
203RDSTW
F
R
E
E
P
O
R
TWAY
185TH ST W
CLAREMONTDR
EVENFALL AVE
FAIRFAX
AVE
ELKWOOD AVE
ECHO TER
ECHO DR
ELLICE LN
DUNBURY AVE
EVELETH CT
EVELETH AVE
EMBERS AVE
GEORG ET O W N W AY
CAR ME L T R L
E
UC
LID
S
T
FIRESIDELN
C E NTERFIE
L
D
CT
E
X
C
H
ANGETRL
188TH ST W
B U T T E R N U T T R L
GLA
CIE
R
W
A
Y
CA
M
D
E
N
P
A
TH
E
M
B
RY
LN
EN
C
H
A
N
TED
WAY
D
U
L
U
T
H S
T
174TH ST W
E X C E L C T
183RD ST W
191STSTW
ESQUIRE WAY
FRENCH AVE
DE
NALI CT
B U R L I N G T O N PATH
EV
E
R
G
R
E
EN
T
R
L
178TH ST W
FOREST ST
EMERALD TRL
CATTAIL LN
CANBYCT
F ORFARCT
GL
A
S
G
O
W
AV
E
EN
G
LE
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
FARADAY LN ENCINA PATH
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
RD
CHANDLER
A
V
E
FOLIAGE AVE
FIREBIRD CT
169TH ST W
197TH ST W
EVEREST TRL
DUL UT H CIR
FURY
CT
EXCELSIOR LN
ERICKSON
P
AT
H
184TH ST W
EV
ERT
O
N
CT
FULDA TRL
ARBOR LN
GALLECT
EWING ST
198TH CT W
E
X
O
D
U
S
A
V
E
ELM ST
14TH ST
FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOW
WAY
DOVER CT
LOWER HERITAGEWAY
CABRILLA WAY
DUNCA
N
C
IR
CAMDENCT
E
S
C
A
L
A
D
E
W
AY
ELLINGTON TRL
EUREKACT
CA
NAR
Y PAT
H
CASTLECT
ROMEO DR
JULIET DR
MACBETH CIR
DUNCAN CT
FALCONAVE
FIELDFARE WAY
201ST ST W
F O R MOSA CT
CENTURYCT
GO
L
DFIN
C
H
DR
C
A
R
AV
EL
CT
FONTINA PATH
ENCORE CT
CANTREL WAY
GARR
I
S
O
N
LN
GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL
CATTA
I
L
CT
BEAUMONTAVE
ELY AVE
E
N
R
IG
H
T W
A
Y
EDMONTON AVE
EXETER AVE
DENALI WAY
ELMWOOD
CI
R
186TH ST W
E N R IGHTCT
172ND ST W
E
S
C
O
R
T
T
R
L
EXP
L
O
RER
WAY
CAMBRIA CT
EVENINGSTARWAY
EAGLEVIEW LN
FROST CT
D
U
N
B
A
R
A
V
E
UPPER 179TH ST W
CALHOUN CT
ETHELTON AVE
189TH ST W
EUCLID AVE
E
MPEROR CT
EXIRA AVE
DIAMOND PATH
EAVESWAY
FIESTAAVE
E
NHANCE
C
T
CAESAR ST
ENGLISHC T
ENIGMA WAY
203RD C T W
FIRESTONEWAY
211TH ST W
LANGFORDLN
CAMBODIA AVE
EMPIRE
TRL
BISCAYNE AVE
220TH
ST
W
FONTANA PA
T
H
LOWER 183RD ST W
DESMO N D CT
KNUTSEN DR
UPPER 204TH ST W
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
D
R
EXLEY AVE
FINCH PATH
CLEO PATRA
D
R
177TH ST W
EUCLID WAY
F
R
UITWOOD
PATH
210TH ST W
E
S
S
E
N
C
E
T
R
L
GALERY DR
FAIR ISLE PATH
DULANEY DR
EXPORT TRL
FAIRMONT AVE
EVENSTONDR
EXCALIBUR TRL
EVENINGTER
192ND ST W
CANTON CIR
GAGE WAY
176TH ST W
TWIN PONDCIR
194TH ST W
ESTES PATH
E
X
E
C
UTIVE
PA
TH
EXCLUSIVE PATH
DYLAN DR
NORTH CREEK LN
CHEVELLE AVE
CHILI AVE
FIELDING WAY
D
A
W
S
O
N L
N
LOWER 182ND ST W
G ET TY SB U R G W AY
ELDORADO WAY
D
E
V
R
IE
P
ATH
EASTOAKS
DR
COLORADO AVED
Y
ERSPASS
MUNICIPALD R
ESTATEAVE
GARCIA WAY
TAMARACK TRL
E
M
B
R
Y AV
E
ELKRIDGE TRL
196TH ST W
DUPONT WAY
EQUINOX AVE
FAIRGREEN AVE
BEAUMONTWAY
ANTHONYDR
ESSEX AVE
BERRING AVE
230TH ST W
220TH ST W
H AMLET
CIR
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
LAKEVILLE
EUREKA TOWNSHIP
HILL DEE PARK
DAISY
KNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVE
PARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVER
PARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
ESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILL
PARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLE
CREEK
PARK
SCHMITZ
MAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEW
PARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTH
CREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIE
PINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y
A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DE
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
A
B C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
CS
A
H
3
1
/
P
I
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
CR 64/ 195th ST W
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
185TH ST W
C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W
KEY
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
EXISTING GREENWAYS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)
PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS
WATER
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/3/19
0 10.5
Miles
DRAFT 5/13/19
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
GLADSTONETRL
BRENNAN PATH
FESTAL AVE
FIELDCREST AVE
M E A D O W L A R K W A Y
225TH ST W
ASTERBILTL N
205TH ST W
193RDSTW
DUSHANE PKWY
179TH ST W
C OUNTRY VIEW TRL
ELK RIVER TRL
EATON AVE
190TH ST W
170TH ST W
181STSTW
UPPER 182N D ST W
173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
A
KI
N
R
D
ABBEY
LN
EC
H
O LN
CENTENNIAL DR
CANTON CT
DUNBURY K N L
FLAGSTAFF AVE
GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY
ERIN CT
224TH ST W
DREAMLN
223RD ST W
GEMINI TRL
BRUTUS DR
DYNAMICDR
CLAIRECT
E A GL E WOOD TRL
E
A
S
T
VI
E
W
A
V
E
EUROPA
AV
E
FAIRVIEW LN
ERIN
WAY
FALCON
PATH
EAGLE LN
SUNNYSID
E
DR
13TH ST
PRAIRIE VIE W TRL
206THSTW
CASC A DEDR
EGRET WAY
CHESTERFIELD WAY
FAIRMEADOW WAY
212THSTW
FOXBOROLN
PARKDR
GERDINE PATH
202ND ST W
FORMOSAAVE
EU
CLID PATH
CAMROSEWAY
200TH ST W
FAIRHAVEN AVE
GANDERLN
GAGE AVE
EASTON AVE
FORTUNE TRL
204TH ST W
W
TRL
ALLAS AVE
EASTWOOD AVE
DOVER
DR
ELGIN AVE
EASTLAKE DR
ENGLISH AVE
DRAFTHO R SE BLVD
EVENSONGAVE
EUREKA AVE
FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR
CALGARYTRL
GLANSHAW AVE
F O L S O M P A T H
SHAKESPEARE BLVD
ROBIN LN
GATEWAYDR
FRAZERPATH
FLINT AVE
D U LCIMER CT
198TH ST W
199THSTW
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
A
T
H
175TH ST W
FIRELIGH T W A Y
EVERESTPATH
FRANCHISE WAY
UPPER 183RD ST W
HERITAGEWAY
EVERHILLAVE
EXCEPTIO
N
A
L
T
R
L
FLUSHINGHILLSC T
ENFIELD WAY
FIVE OAKS DR
FINESSE TRL
FAIRHILLAVE
203RDSTW
F
R
E
E
P
O
R
TWAY
185TH ST W
CLAREMONTDR
EVENFALL AVE
FAIRFAX
AVE
ELKWOOD AVE
ECHO TER
ECHO DR
ELLICE LN
DUNBURY AVE
EVELETH CT
EVELETH AVE
EMBERS AVE
GEORGETOWNWAY
CARM E L T R L
E
UC
LID
S
T
FIRESIDELN
C E NTERFIE
L
D
CT
E
X
C
H
ANGETRL
188TH ST W
B U T T E R N U T T R L
GLA
CIE
R
W
A
Y
CA
M
D
E
N
P
A
TH
E
M
B
RY
LN
EN
C
H
A
N
TED
WAY
D
U
L
U
T
H S
T
174TH ST W
E X C E L C T
183RD STW
191STSTW
ESQUIRE WAY
FRENCH AVE
DE
NALI CT
B U R LI N G T O N P AT H
EV
E
R
G
R
E
EN
T
R
L
178TH ST W
FOREST ST
EMERALD TRL
CATTAIL LN
CANBYCT
F ORFARCT
GL
A
S
G
O
W
AV
E
EN
G
LE
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
FARADAY LN ENCINA PATH
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
RD
CHANDLER
A
V
E
FOLIAGE AVE
FIREBIRD CT
169TH ST W
197TH ST W
EVEREST TRL
DU L U T H CIR
FURY
CT
EXCELSIOR LN
ERICKSON
P
AT
H
184TH ST W
EV
ERT
O
N
CT
FULDA TRL
ARBOR LN
GALLECT
EWING ST
198TH CT W
E
X
O
D
U
S
A
V
E
ELM ST
14TH ST
FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOW
WAY
DOVER CT
LOWERHERITAGEWAY
CABRILLA WAY
DUNCA
N
C
IR
CAMDENCT
E
S
C
A
L
A
D
E
W
AY
ELLINGTON TRL
EUREKACT
CA
NAR
Y PAT
H
CASTLECT
ROMEO DR
JULIET DR
MACBETH CIR
DUNCAN CT
FALCONAVE
FIELDFARE WAY
201ST ST W
F O R MOSACT
CENTURYCT
GO
L
DFIN
C
H
DR
C
A
R
AV
EL
CT
FONTINA PATH
ENCORE CT
CANTREL WAY
GARR
I
S
O
N
LN
GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL
CATTA
I
L
CT
BEAUMONTAVE
ELY AVE
E
N
R
IG
H
T W
A
Y
EDMONTON AVE
EXETER AVE
DENALI WAY
ELMWOOD
CI
R
186TH ST W
E N R IGHTCT
172ND ST W
E
S
C
O
R
T
T
R
L
EXP
L
O
RER
WAY
CAMBRIA C T
EVENINGSTARWAY
EAGLEVIEW LN
FROST CT
D
U
N
B
A
R
A
V
E
UPPER 179TH ST W
CALHOUN CT
ETHELTON AVE
189TH ST W
EUCLID AVE
E
MPEROR CT
EXIRA AVE
DIAMOND PATH
EAVESWAY
FIESTAAVE
E
NHANCE
C
T
CAESAR ST
ENGLISHC T
ENIGMAWAY
203RD C T W
FIRESTONEWAY
211TH ST W
LANGFORDLN
CAMBODIA AVE
EMPIRE
TRL
BISCAYNE AVE
220TH
ST
W
FONTANA PA
T
H
LOWER 183RD ST W
DESMO N D CT
KNUTSEN DR
UPPER 204TH ST W
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
D
R
EXLEY AVE
FINCH PATH
CLEOPATRA
D
R
177TH ST W
EUCLID WAY
F
R
UITWOOD
PATH
210TH ST W
E
S
S
E
N
C
E
T
R
L
GALERY DR
FAIR ISLE PATH
DULANEY DR
EXPORT TRL
FAIRMONT AVE
EVENSTONDR
EXCALIBUR TRL
EVENINGTER
192ND ST W
CANTON CIR
GAGE WAY
176TH ST W
TWINPONDCIR
194TH ST W
ESTES PATH
E
X
E
C
UTIVE
PA
TH
EXCLUSIVE PATH
DYLAN DR
NORTH CREEK LN
CHEVELLE AVE
CHILI AVE
FIELDING WAY
D
A
W
S
O
N L
N
LOWER 182ND ST W
G ET TYSB U R G WAY
ELDORADO WAY
D
E
V
R
IE
P
ATH
EASTOAKS
DR
COLORADO AVED
Y
ERSPASS
MUNICIPALD R
ESTATEAVE
GARCIAWAY
TAMAR ACKTRL
E
M
B
R
Y AV
E
ELKRIDGE TRL
196TH ST W
DUPONT WAY
EQUINOX AVE
FAIRGREEN AVE
BEAUMONTWAY
ANTHONYDR
ESSEX AVE
BERRING AVE
230TH ST W
220TH ST W
H AMLET
CIR
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
LAKEVILLE
EUREKA TOWNSHIP
HILL DEE PARK
DAISY
KNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVE
PARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVER
PARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
ESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILL
PARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLE
CREEK
PARK
SCHMITZ
MAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEW
PARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTH
CREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIE
PINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y
A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DE
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
A
B C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
CS
A
H
3
1
/
P
I
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
CR 64/ 195th ST W
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
185TH ST W
C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W
KEY
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
EXISTING GREENWAYS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)
PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS
WATER
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/3/19
0 10.5
Miles
DRAFT 5/13/19
Figure 3.1 Draft Network Plan
3-4
roadway 8-10’ paved trail
10’
Neighborhood Trail Recommendations
Figure 3.2 Typical Neighborhood Trail Section
Network Plan Elements
the following network Plan elements are shown in the draft
network Plan.
Neighborhood Trails
neighborhood trails are multi-use paved trails that connect
residential areas to local parks and to the connector trail
network. these trails exist today within established Farmington
neighborhoods and are generally aligned with low-volume
roadways. these trails are intended for use by pedestrians and
bicyclists. Future neighborhood trails are indicated in alignment
with the 2040 comprehensive Plan, and future developments are
required to build trail connections in new neighborhoods according
to these general alignments.
»8-10’ wide asphalt-paved trails, to meet
neighborhood development standards set by the
city of Farmington
»curb ramps at all intersection crossings
»trail amenities such as lighting, wayfinding,
and benches to be determined as needed
by neighborhood association or per city of
Farmington recommendation
»Future funding/implementation: owner/developer
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-5 netWork Plan
connector trails are multi-use paved trails that connect longer
distances across the city. connector trails are generally in alignment
with higher volume roadways, such as Pilot knob road, aikin
road, and Highway 50. these trails are intended to serve as major
connections to schools, parks, commercial, employment and civic
areas, as well as provide connections to neighboring communities.
connector trails, in combination with Farmington greenways,
create a legible, continuous system that provides high-quality
trail experience with a rough grid network connection at half mile
intervals throughout the entire city.
»trail lighting (lower, pedestrian-scaled lighting or
bollard-style lighting)
»community wayfinding at key intersections,
directional signage to key community destinations
»High visibility crosswalk markings and curb ramps
at roadway crossings
»Benches/seating as needed
»maximum separation between the roadway and
trail for added comfort/safety for trail users
»Year-round availability (snow clearing) performed
or enforced by the city (phased approach)
»minimum 8’ (preferable 10’+) width should be
maintained, with potential lane markings
»Future developments that are adjacent to or
contain plans for future connector trail network
segments should align future trails as closely as
possible as the plan shows, with the understanding
that these trail segments are part of a larger city-
wide trail network.
»Where feasible, consideration of grade-separated
crossings at intersecting high-volume roadways
»Future funding/implementation: developers, city
of Farmington, regional and local trail/srts grant
funding, dakota county, mndot
Connector Trails
Connector Trail Recommendations
roadway 8-10’ paved trail
10’
pedestrian-scaled
lighting
community
waynding
Figure 3.3 Typical Connector Trail Section
3-6
Greenways
greenways are multi-use paved trails that are located in scenic,
natural, parkland, open space, or undeveloped areas. greenways are
primarily located independent of an existing roadway. these trails
are intended to provide recreational opportunities for bicyclists and
pedestrians, with opportunities to connect to the rural or natural
landscape. regional trails, such as the Vermillion river greenway
and the north creek greenway exist today in Farmington. this
plan proposes and supports the continued completion of these
trail networks, as well as introduces a few key greenway segments
that could provide direct connections to local schools. Farmington’s
greenways, in combination with connector trails, create a legible,
continuous system that provides high-quality trail experience with a
rough grid network connection at half mile intervals throughout the
entire city.
Greenway Recommendations
MILE
8-10’ trail
10’
interpretive
sign
MILE
8-10’ trail
10’
interpretive
sign
Figure 3.4 Typical Greenway Section
»trailhead locations with on-street or dedicated
parking
»trail identification (name) and signage at trail
access points and at key intersections
»minimum 8’ (preferable 10’+) width should be
maintained with a 2’ buffer (mowed/cleared area)
on either side of the trail
»interpretive or educational signage at key
locations to inform trail users about local
attractions, native plants and wildlife habitat, or
cultural/historical markers
»Benches and seating at key vistas or viewpoints.
Preferably located every half-mile along the trail
»Where feasible, consideration of grade-separated
crossings at intersecting high-volume roadways
»emergency call boxes in remote locations
»Year-round availability (snow clearing) performed
or enforced by the city (phased approach)
»Future funding/implementation: city of
Farmington, state/regional/local trail grant
funding, outdoor/recreational trail grant funding,
dakota county
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-7 netWork Plan
On-Street Bikeway Recommendations
On-Street Bikeways
on-street Bikeways are signed bike routes that provide key
connections and fill network gaps in the connector trail network.
on-street Bikeways are located along existing roadways with low
volume traffic, wide right-of-way widths, and low instances of on-
street parking. today, it is understood that bicyclists are able to use
any roadway in Farmington, provided that the bicyclists follow the
rules of the road. For the purposes of this plan, on-street bikeways
are not intended to be striped with dedicated bike lanes. However,
with future increased use, the city of Farmington may consider
upgrading these roadways with dedicated bike lanes upon future
evaluation.
Figure 3.5 Typical On-Street Bikeway Section
roadway + on-street bikeway sidewalksidewalk
10’
bikeway
sign
»Bikeway signage, to be visible to drivers and
bicyclists, located at key intersections and along
roadways
»roadway markings, where necessary
»consistent street lighting throughout bikeway
»Future funding/implementation: city of
Farmington
3-8
roadway sidewalksidewalk
10’
pedestrian-scaled
lighting seating
Figure 3.6 Typical Activity Area Section
Sidewalks + Activity Areas
sidewalks are concrete paved walkways, intended for use by
pedestrians to connect within residential areas and commercial
areas. sidewalks are essential in urbanized areas to allow for
people of all abilities to gain access to businesses, schools, and
community destinations. in Farmington, sidewalks are required
in new developments along one side of the street. sidewalk
connections exist in some parts of the existing neighborhoods north
of downtown, and a nearly complete network of sidewalks exist (on
both sides of the street) in downtown and in the neighborhoods
east of tH3. a number of activity areas have been identified in
Farmington; these are areas where there is a high demand for
increased pedestrian safety and comfort.
Sidewalk + Activity Area Recommendations
»on-going effort to complete sidewalk network
gaps
»enforcement by the city of Farmington for
businesses and residents to keep sidewalks clear in
the winter
»Pedestrian-scaled lighting
»curb ramps at all intersections
»High visibility crosswalk markings + forward stop
bars at major intersections in the downtown
commercial area
»Wayfinding and distance markers to community
destinations
»seating, planters, and placemaking elements
located within commercial areas
»sidewalk replacement/repair schedule as needed
»Future funding/implementation: Business owners,
property owners, city of Farmington, streetscape/
pedestrian/urban design grant opportunities
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-9 netWork Plan
Intersection Treatments
a number of intersections have been identified for future treatments
to improve crossing and visibility for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Below are recommended treatments at each intersection (keyed
on the draft network Plan). to the left are examples of some of the
treatments recommended below.
Reduced curb radii: slows traffic at turns and
decreases the distance required of pedestrians to
cross intersections.
User-activated signal: pedestrians use a button
to activate a lights, signalling to vehicles to stop
and yield.
Pedestrian crossing signs: to be placed at the
approach of roundabouts, alerting drivers of
pedestrian crossings
High visibility crosswalks: make pedestrians
more visible within crosswalks.
Forward stop bars: increase buffer between
stopped vehicles and crosswalks at intersections
Pilot knob Rd and Upper 182nd St
»High visibility crosswalk markings
»Forward stop bars
»Potential for decreased curb radii
»leading Pedestrian interval for ped walk signal
»intersection was identified in the dakota county Bike Ped Plan for
potential grade separated crossing
»requires coordination with dakota county
A
B
C
D
E
F
CR 64/195th Street and Pilot knob Rd
»‘Pedestrian crossing’ signs to be installed on the right side of approach
to intersection at pedestrian crosswalk
»requires coordination with dakota county
CR 64/195th Street and Akin Rd
»‘Pedestrian crossing’ signs to be installed on the right side of approach
to intersection at pedestrian crosswalk
»requires coordination with dakota county
CR 64/195th Street and Highway 3
»‘Pedestrian crossing’ signs to be installed on the right side of approach
to intersection at pedestrian crosswalk
»requires coordination with dakota county + mndot
CSAH 50 and Akin Rd/Denmark Ave
»High visibility crosswalk markings
»Forward stop bars
»requires coordination with dakota county
(Future) Vermillion Greenway and Highway 3
»High visibility crosswalk markings
»Forward stop bars
»requires coordination with dakota county
3-10
Grade-separated crossings: trail overpasses or
tunnels that allow trail users to avoid crossing
intersections with vehicular or rail traffic.
Pedestrian Islands: concrete barriers or raised
curbs that provide protection for pedestrians
at crosswalks. Pedestrian islands decrease the
distance required for pedestrians to cross a busy
roadway.
G
H
I
J
k
willow St and 8th Street (at Dairy Queen/Highway 3)
»High visibility crosswalk crossing Willow street, to be coordinated with
future shared use path aligned with Highway 3
Elm St and Highway 3
»High visibility crosswalks (existing)
»Forward stop bars
»leading pedestrian interval / signal countdown
»improve pedestrian island
»requires coordination with mndot
Spruce St and Highway 3
»Potential location for future user-activated signal, such as rrFB or
HaWk signal
»requires high visibility crosswalks
»requires lowered speed limit to 35mph or lower along Highway 3
»requires coordination with mndot
Beech St/Maple St and Highway 3
»Potential location for future user-activated signal, such as rrFB or
HaWk signal, to connect students to Farmington elementary school
»requires high visibility crosswalks
»requires lowered speed limit to 35mph or lower along Highway 3
»requires coordination with mndot
CR 50/220th St and Highway 3
»High visibility crosswalks (existing)
»Forward stop bars
»leading pedestrian interval
»Pedestrian crossing to connect to future trail connection east of
Highway 3
»requires coordination with mndot
Leading pedestrian intervals: updated signal
timing allows for pedestrians to cross a roadway
before vehicles. This allows pedestrians the ability
to get a head start on crossing the intersection
while all traffic is stopped.
0-7 seconds 7+ seconds
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-11 netWork Plan
System Recommendations
the following system recommendations have been developed to
augment and support the network Plan:
1. Trail alignments within new developments may vary from
the Bike + Ped Network Plan and the 2040 Comprehensive
Plan, but should generally follow the alignments shown
to connect to adjacent trails, per guidance from City of
Farmington planning, engineering and parks staff.
»Future trails are shown in the 2040 comprehensive Plan (2018).
these trails are also shown in the Bike + Ped network Plan
(2019), along with future trails and sidewalks per the downtown
redevelopment Plan (2016). in general, new developments in
Farmington are required to include sidewalks and trails, per the
city of Farmington development code. it is important that these
new trails and sidewalks connect to adjacent and/or existing trails
and sidewalks to contribute to a continuous and comfortable
bike and pedestrian network, with neighborhoods that are well
connected to other neighborhoods and destinations throughout
the city.
2. The City of Farmington will be responsible for winter snow
removal along Connector and Greenway Trails as designated
in the Bike + Ped Network Plan.
»the connector trail network is intended to serve the largest
number of people throughout the year to connect residents and
visitors across the city to important community destinations such
as parks, schools, and commercial areas. greenways are intended
to provide recreational connections to scenic and natural areas.
By committing to year-round trail access, the city of Farmington
is extending the use of their existing network, while providing
opportunities for people with disabilities, children, seniors,
and others to choose walking or biking as a viable mode of
transportation year-round.
»today, much of the existing connector trail and existing
greenway trail network is cleared year-round by the city of
Farmington, with four levels of plowing priorities. downtown
sidewalks and the 195th street trail are first priority, with trails
leading to schools and/or bus stops as second priority. outdoor
rinks are third priority and other trail loops are fourth priority. as
this system functions today, generally existing connector trails are
first or second priority, and greenways are fourth priority. as new
trails are constructed, the city will need to evaluate the plowing
priority for new segments.
»Future evaluation of this recommendation may lead to extending
city-sponsored snow removal for activity areas.
3-12
»today, all Farmington residents are responsible for clearing of
snow and ice for sidewalks and trails within their property; future
evaluation of this recommendation may lead to changes in this
city-wide policy.
3. All Farmington Schools will be connected to trail and/or
sidewalk facilities to ensure Safe Routes to Schools. The City
of Farmington will coordinate with the Farmington School
District to ensure bicycle and pedestrian connections are
continued to each school’s main entryway.
»today, schools in Farmington are accessible by biking and walking
to varying degrees; some Farmington schools are located where
there are significant challenges to walking and biking to school by
students. the network Plan prioritizes connections to all schools
in Farmington through future trail and sidewalk connections, as
well as enhanced intersection treatments.
»events at schools, such as athletic events or performances draw
an increased amount of vehicular traffic and on-street parking
near schools. to accommodate safe roadway and parking lot
access for pedestrians and bicyclists, special consideration
should be made with high visibility crosswalk markings and
other enhanced safety measures beyond the immediate school
boundary.
»the city will encourage all schools to participate in safe routes
to school program, and participate in safe routes to school
planning and implementation where possible.
4. Establish pedestrian priority zones to support design
standards that encourage walking in destination-filled
locations. These locations are noted in the Network Plan as
Activity Areas, and include:
»downtown Farmington
»emerging activity centers (to be determined with future
development)
»Within the activity areas, it is important to provide a continuous
and comfortable network for pedestrians, to allow movement
between clusters of destinations, such as parks, local businesses,
and civic centers. today, downtown Farmington has an
established grid street network that lends itself well to pedestrian
connections, however there are gaps in sidewalks and trails
today, and the railroad poses a barrier to east-west travel. in the
future, as roadways are re-constructed and improved in activity
areas, sidewalks, trails, and other pedestrian amenities should be
considered within the design.
»continue to establish rambling river Park and the depot Way
art walk as an “active gateway” to the city and enhance their
connection to downtown Farmington.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-13 netWork Plan
5. Consider enhanced safety measures for Connector and
Greenway Trails at all roadway crossings where traffic
volumes are high or where safety for all roadway and trail
users is a concern.
»High-volume roadways are generally defined have more than
10,000 vehicles per day.
»safety measures for connector and greenway trails at these
intersections may include:
-Grade-separated crossings such as tunnels or bridges
-High-visibility crosswalks
-User-activated signals or signal-timing upgrades (Leading
Pedestrian Intervals)
-Increased signage
»Future intersection upgrades should be coordinated with the
appropriate agencies and may need further study to determine
the appropriate safety measures.
6. Improve communication of the bike and ped network.
»develop a coordinated wayfinding and signage strategy to
communicate priority and greenway trail networks
»create and post updated trail and bikeway routes using city
communications
7. Develop encouragement and educational programs that
promote a culture of biking and walking in Farmington.
»Work with rambling river center to develop walking and biking
clubs for seniors and families
»expand the bicycle fleet in use today by the Farmington school
district to support programming developed by the rambling
river center, or community education
»Work with the Farmington Police department to host bike rodeos
or safety demonstrations at community events
»coordinate an open streets event in Farmington where a block
or two of roadway is closed to vehicle traffic for an afternoon or
day and outdoor community events are hosted.
»Promote bike racks at local businesses and civic buildings,
and provide information through the chamber of commerce to
promote bicycle-friendly business practices.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
CHAPTER 4
Implementation
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-2 Implementation Plan
4-2 Implementation Recommendations
4-4 Phasing Strategy
4-12 Operations + Maintenance
4-13 Funding Strategies
4-1 imPlementation
4-2
Implementation Plan
the Bike + Ped Plan for the city of Farmington outlines goals for the
walking and biking network and system plan for the next 10 years.
the implementation Plan focuses on how to transform the plan
into reality. First, some general implementation recommendations
are outlined, which are intended to provide guidance for policy
and coordination of implementation efforts. a phasing strategy
is outlined, which breaks tasks down into priority, on-going, and
long-term projects. next, a breakdown of projected costs for capital
projects as well as maintenance and operations are outlined. Finally,
a number of funding resources are identified in this chapter.
Implementation Recommendations
the following recommendations have been developed to assist with
policy and implementation of the plan:
1. Coordinate with other agencies (MnDOT, Dakota County,
Empire Township, Lakeville, Eureka Township, Castle Rock,
Farmington School District, Community Ed) to incorporate
Farmington Bike + Ped Plan elements into their planning and
areas of responsibility.
»an annual bike + ped planning meeting could be hosted by the
city of Farmington to evaluate and identify collaborative projects.
»the city of Farmington and dakota county have a history of
working collaboratively on the design and construction of trails
and sidewalks within dakota county right-of-ways. in the last 10
years, the city and county have worked together to develop
approved regional greenway master plans that will connect the
city to the county’s regional park and trail system.
-Today, 30% (13 miles) of the existing trail network in Farmington
is within Dakota County right-of-way.
-In the planning process for the Bike + Ped Plan, Dakota County
Transportation staff worked with the project team to identify
specific intersection treatments at round-abouts on county
roadways.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-3 imPlementation
»state Highway 3 has been identified as a significant barrier to
cross-city travel by bicyclists and pedestrians, both through this
planning effort as well as through the recent Highway 3 corridor
Plan.
-In the planning process for the Bike + Ped Plan, MnDOT
Transportation staff worked with the project team to identify
future trail connections along Highway 3, as well as the potential
for a lowered speed limit along Highway 3 through Farmington.
With future decreased speed limits, there is possibility of
implementing user-activated and high-visibility crosswalks to
connect bicyclists and pedestrians across Highway 3.
2. Regularly evaluate progress of the implementation of the
Plan.
»annually update city gis files
»annually review progress on recommendations
»determine projects to include in ciP, projects to pursue grant
funding
»this plan is intended to provide guidance for the next 10 years;
consider a Bike + Ped Plan update in coordination with the 2050
comprehensive Plan update.
3. Consider an on-going Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee,
potentially alongside the City Parks Commission
»role to assist with implementation and evaluation of plan
elements
»consider rotating members, terms of service, role/charge, diverse
viewpoints.
4-4
Phasing Strategy
identifying priorities and demonstrating visible, measurable progress
is essential to implement the plan to maintain momentum to reach
longer-term goals.
Priority Projects
recommended priority projects have been identified through
community outreach, as well as with input from the BPP committee
and city staff. these priority projects are projected to have the
biggest impact for improving safety and comfort for pedestrian and
bicycle movement in Farmington. Priority projects are intended to
be completed or have substantial progress towards completion in
the next 1-5 years. see Figure 4.1 and table 4.1 for a keyed plan and
table of Priority Projects.
»intersection treatments:
-Coordinate with Dakota County Transportation to install high
visibility crosswalk markings and pedestrian crossing signs at
the approach of round-about intersections along 195th Street.
-Coordinate with Dakota County Transportation to address
intersection treatments at Pilot Knob Road / Upper 195th Street
and at Akin Road/CSAH 50.
-Coordinate with MnDOT to implement enhanced intersection
treatments at Elm Street and TH3.
»tH3 Pedestrian safety and connector trail:
-A trail connection along TH 3 from 205th Street to the southern
City limits along with enhanced safety for pedestrian crossings
at a number of intersections along TH 3 in Farmington have been
strongly identified by the community as priority projects.
-Coordination with MnDOT is key to moving forward. While it may
not be feasible to construct the TH3 trail in the next 1-3 years
due to lack of funding, progress can be made towards working
with MnDOT to lower the speed limit through this area, which
will pave the way for implementation of intersection treatments,
such as user-activated signals at Spruce Street and Maple Street.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-5 imPlementation
»connector trail and on-street Bikeways within downtown
Farmington:
-On-Street Bikeway on Willow Street and 4th Street
-On-Street Bikeway along 205th Street (funded and planned for
implementation 2019)
-Connector Trail from Akin Road and CSAH 50/Denmark
Avenue to Spruce Street, Spruce Street from Denmark Ave to
TH 3 (Denmark Ave to Division Street funded and planned for
implementation 2021/2022)
»connector trail and greenway trail connections
-Connector Trail along Flagstaff Ave from 195th Street to CSAH
50) to serve Farmington High School, including connection to
200th Street south of Meadowview Elementary School
-Connector Trail missing segment on west side of Pilot Knob
Road south of 197th Street (Identified by Dakota County as a
High Priority Trail Gap)
-North Creek Greenway connection to Lakeville and boardwalk
section at North Creek Park (funded and planned construction
for 2021)
»Wayfinding Plan
-Complete a city-wide wayfinding and signage plan to correspond
with the Bike + Ped Network Plan
-To include locations and design of wayfinding
»educational and encouragement Programs
-Work with Rambling River Center to develop walking and biking
clubs for seniors and families
-Expand the bicycle fleet in use today by the Farmington School
District to support programming developed by the Rambling
River Center, or Community Education
-Work with the Farmington Police Department to host bike rodeos
or safety demonstrations at community events
-Coordinate an Open Streets event in Farmington where a block or
two of roadway is closed to vehicle traffic for an afternoon or day
and outdoor community events are hosted.
-Promote bike racks at local businesses and civic buildings,
and provide information through the chamber of commerce to
promote bicycle=friendly business practices.
Figure 4.1 Phasing Plan: Priority Projects
4-6
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEWELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
HILL DEE PARK
DAISYKNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVEPARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVERPARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTYESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILLPARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLECREEK
PARK
SCHMITZMAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEWPARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTHCREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIEPINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DEE
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
EXISTING TRAILSPRIORITY PROJECTS
PHASING PLAN KEY
ON-GOING PROJECTS
LONG-TERM PROJECTS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)WATER
PARKS
SCHOOLS
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/6/19
0 10.5 Miles
1 1
1
2
3 4
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
9
10
11
12
12
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-7 imPlementation
Map
Key Project Description Potential
Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy
1 Intersection treatments at round-abouts
along 195th Street Dakota County $10,000 - $12,000
(4) signs with
pavement
markings x 3
intersections
General Funds (Dakota County)
2 Intersection treatment at Pilot Knob
Road/Upper 195th Street Dakota County $2,000 - $5,000
pavement
markings, curb
extensions
General Funds (Dakota County), State Aid
Funds
3 Intersection treatment at Akin
Road/CSAH 50 Dakota County $500 - $1,000 pavement
markings
General Funds (Dakota County), State Aid
Funds
4 Intersection treatments at Elm Street
and TH3 MnDOT $2,000 - $3,000
pavement
markings, signal
timing
General Funds (MnDOT), State Aid Funds
5 TH 3 Connector Trail MnDOT $630,000 - $850,000 2.0 miles General Funds (MnDOT), State Aid Funds
6
Intersection Treatments on TH3 (Willow
Street, Spruce Street, Maple/Beech
Street, CSAH 50)
MnDOT, Dakota
County $6,000 -
pavement
markings, signal
timing, curb
extensions, user-
activated signals
General Funds (MnDOT), State Aid Funds
7 On-Street Bikeway on Willow and 4th
Streets 4,000 - $5,000 6,600 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
8 On-Street Bikeway on 205th Street Empire Township n/a (funded)$1,600 LF n/a (funded)
9
Connector Trail from Aikin Road/CSAH
50 to Spruce Street, Spruce Street from
Denmark Ave to TH3)
Farmington Public
Schools $450,000 - $600,000 7,500 LF
General Funds (City of Farmington);
partially funded and planned for
construction in 2021/2022, Local Trail
Connections Grant, Regional Solicitation
Grant
10
Connector Trail on Flagstaff Avenue
from 195th Street to CSAH 50,
Connection to 200th Street
Farmington Public
Schools
$1,200,000 -
$1,600,000 20,000 LF
General Funds (City of Farmington) Safe
Routes to School Infrastructure Grant,
Regional Solicitation Grant, Local Trail
Connections Grant
11 Connector Trail segment on Pilot Knob
Road south of 197th Street Dakota County $84,000 - $112,000 1,400 LF General Funds, State Aid Funds
12
North Creek Greenway Connection to
Lakeville and boardwalk section at North
Creek Park
Dakota County n/a (funded)
2.1 miles,
boardwalk
connection
Funded through Regional Solicitation
Grants for implementation 2021/2022
13 Wayfinding Plan Dakota County $15,000 - $25,000
Plan to guide
wayfinding
locations and
design
SHIP Funds, General Funds (City of
Farmington), Regional Solicitation Grant
14 Educational and Encouragement
Programs
Rambling River Center,
Community
Education, Farmington
Police Department,
Farmington Public
Schools, Farmington
Chamber of
Commerce
n/a n/a
SHIP Funding, General Gunds (City of
Farmington), Grant funding, Safe Routes to
School
Priority Projects Capital Costs
Table 4.1 Capital Costs: Priority Projects
4-8
On-Going Projects
the following projects have been identified as medium-priority, to
be completed as funding or opportunities become available. see
Figure 4.2 and table 4.2 for a keyed plan and table of on-going
Projects.
»connector trail, on-street Bikeways, and greenway trails around
downtown Farmington:
-On-Street Bikeways along 1st Street from Rambling River Park
to CR 50, 12th Street and Spruce Street in Prairie View Park,
Centennial/Evergreen Knoll Park
-Connector Trails on Maple Street, 6th Street, CR 50, Vermillion
River Trail, Elm Street/3rd Street/Pine Street
»other trails and on-street Bikeways:
-On-Street Bikeway on Everhill Avenue to 195th Street
-On-Street Bikeways on Embers Avenue, English Avenue, 185th
Street W and Upper 182nd Street W
-Greenway Trail through Farmington Preserve Park
-Greenway Trail to Daisy Knoll Park from Pilot Knob Road
-Greenway Trail from North Creek Park to tunnel under 195th
Street
»sidewalk and activity area improvements in downtown
Farmington
-To be completed as roadways are improved/reconstructed
»trail recommendations:
-High visibility crosswalks, curb extensions, and forward stop
bars at Connector and Greenway Trail intersections
-Lighting, seating, and interpretation along Connector and
Greenway segments
»complete safe routes to school Plans for all schools in the
district
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-9 imPlementation
long-Term Projects
the following projects have been identified as long-term
projects. these projects will require larger fundraising efforts and
collaborative planning with dakota county, neighboring townships,
and future development. see Figure 4.2 and table 4.2 for a keyed
plan and table of long-term Projects.
»lake marion, north creek, and Vermillion river greenway
segments in Farmington (in coordination with dakota county)
»greenway loop from northwest Farmington to future north creek
greenway
»connector trail extensions on Flagstaff avenue north of 195th
street and south of csaH 50, eastview/eaton avenue, 200th
street, 190th street W, 203rd street, diamond Path, and future
roadways in northeast Farmington as development occurs
Figure 4.2 Phasing Plan: On-Going and Long-Term Projects
4-10
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEWELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
HILL DEE PARK
DAISYKNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVEPARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVERPARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTYESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILLPARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLECREEK
PARK
SCHMITZMAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEWPARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTHCREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIEPINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DEE
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
EXISTING TRAILSPRIORITY PROJECTS
PHASING PLAN KEY
ON-GOING PROJECTS
LONG-TERM PROJECTS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)WATER
PARKS
SCHOOLS
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/6/19
0 10.5 Miles
1 1 1
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1013
14
15
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Map
Key Project Description Potential
Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy
1
On-Street Bikeways on 1st Street, 12th
Street and Spruce Street, and in the
Centennial neighborhood
Downtown Businesses $7,000 - $9,000 11,400 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
2
Connector Trails on Maple Street, 6th
Street, CR 50, Beech Street near
Farmington Elementary and Middle
Schools
Farmington School
District $700,000 - $950,000 11,800 LF
Safe Routes to School Grants, Local Trail
Connections, General Funds (City of
Farmington)
3 Connector Trail on Vermillion River Trail,
Willow Street Downtown Businesses $500,000 - $720,000 9,100 LF Local Trail Connections Grant,
Development
4 Connector Trail on Elm Street, 3rd Street,
Pine Street near Rambling River Park $195,000 - $270,000 3350 LF
Local Trail Connections Grant, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (City of Farmington)
5 On-Street Bikeway on Everhill Avenue $2,000 3000 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
6
On-Street Bikeways on Embers Avenue,
English Avenue, 185th Street W and
Upper 182nd Street W
$10,500 15,800 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
7 Greenway Trail through Farmington
Preserve Park $49,000 - $66,000 820 LF General Funds (City of Farmington),
MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant
8 Greenway Trail to Daisy Knoll Park $114000 - $152,000 1,900 LF General Funds (City of Farmington),
MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant
9 Greenway Trail from North Creek Park to
tunnel under 195th Street Dakota County $186,000 - $248,000 3,100 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, General Funds
(City of Farmington), MnDNR Natural and
Scenic Area Grant
10 Sidewalk and Activity Area
improvements in Downtown Farmington Downtown Businesses General Funds (City of Farmington),
Regional Solicitation Grant
11
Trail Recommendations (intersection
treatments, lighting, seating,
interpretation)
Dakota County,
Farmington School
District, Downtown
Businesses
Regional Solicitation Grants, Local Trail
Connections, General Funds (City of
Farmington)
12 Safe Routes to School Plans MnDOT, Farmington
School District
MnDOT Safe Routes to School Planning
Assistance
Map
Key Project Description Potential
Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy
13 Lake Marion Greenway Dakota County $875,000 - $1.2M 14,600 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
14 North Creek Greenway Dakota County $270,000 - $360,000 4,500 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
15 Vermillion River Greenway Dakota County,
Empire Township $430,000 - $575,000 7,200 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
16 Farmington Greenway Loop
Developers,
Farmington Public
Schools
$2.0M - 2.8M 34,500 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (City of Farmington), Developers
17
Connector Trail Extensions (Flagstaff Ave,
Eastview/Eaton Ave, 200th Street, 190th
Street, 203rd Street, Diamond Path,
future roadways in northeast Farmington
Developers, adjacent
Townships and cities,
MnDOT
$3.2M - $4.2M 53,000 LF
Developers, Local Trail Connection grants,
General Funds (City of Farmington,
MnDOT)
On-Going Projects Capital Costs
Long-Term Projects Capital Costs
Map
Key Project Description Potential
Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy
1
On-Street Bikeways on 1st Street, 12th
Street and Spruce Street, and in the
Centennial neighborhood
Downtown Businesses $7,000 - $9,000 11,400 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
2
Connector Trails on Maple Street, 6th
Street, CR 50, Beech Street near
Farmington Elementary and Middle
Schools
Farmington School
District $700,000 - $950,000 11,800 LF
Safe Routes to School Grants, Local Trail
Connections, General Funds (City of
Farmington)
3 Connector Trail on Vermillion River Trail,
Willow Street Downtown Businesses $500,000 - $720,000 9,100 LF Local Trail Connections Grant,
Development
4 Connector Trail on Elm Street, 3rd Street,
Pine Street near Rambling River Park $195,000 - $270,000 3350 LF
Local Trail Connections Grant, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (City of Farmington)
5 On-Street Bikeway on Everhill Avenue $2,000 3000 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
6
On-Street Bikeways on Embers Avenue,
English Avenue, 185th Street W and
Upper 182nd Street W
$10,500 15,800 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
7 Greenway Trail through Farmington
Preserve Park $49,000 - $66,000 820 LF General Funds (City of Farmington),
MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant
8 Greenway Trail to Daisy Knoll Park $114000 - $152,000 1,900 LF General Funds (City of Farmington),
MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant
9 Greenway Trail from North Creek Park to
tunnel under 195th Street Dakota County $186,000 - $248,000 3,100 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, General Funds
(City of Farmington), MnDNR Natural and
Scenic Area Grant
10 Sidewalk and Activity Area
improvements in Downtown Farmington Downtown Businesses General Funds (City of Farmington),
Regional Solicitation Grant
11
Trail Recommendations (intersection
treatments, lighting, seating,
interpretation)
Dakota County,
Farmington School
District, Downtown
Businesses
Regional Solicitation Grants, Local Trail
Connections, General Funds (City of
Farmington)
12 Safe Routes to School Plans MnDOT, Farmington
School District
MnDOT Safe Routes to School Planning
Assistance
Map
Key Project Description Potential
Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy
13 Lake Marion Greenway Dakota County $875,000 - $1.2M 14,600 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
14 North Creek Greenway Dakota County $270,000 - $360,000 4,500 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
15 Vermillion River Greenway Dakota County,
Empire Township $430,000 - $575,000 7,200 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
16 Farmington Greenway Loop
Developers,
Farmington Public
Schools
$2.0M - 2.8M 34,500 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (City of Farmington), Developers
17
Connector Trail Extensions (Flagstaff Ave,
Eastview/Eaton Ave, 200th Street, 190th
Street, 203rd Street, Diamond Path,
future roadways in northeast Farmington
Developers, adjacent
Townships and cities,
MnDOT
$3.2M - $4.2M 53,000 LF
Developers, Local Trail Connection grants,
General Funds (City of Farmington,
MnDOT)
On-Going Projects Capital Costs
Long-Term Projects Capital Costs
Table 4.2 Capital Costs: On-Going Projects
4-11 imPlementation
Quantity
(Miles)
Quantity
(Feet)
Annual O + M
Cost
Total O+M Annual
Cost Capital Cost
Total Projected
Capital /
Replacement
Costs
Estimated
Life Notes
Existing Asphalt Trails 46.8 Miles 247,104 Feet $1,200 - $2,000 /
Mile $56,160 - $93,600 $60 / LF 14.8 M 30 years Assumes trails 8' wide or less
Proposed Asphalt Trails 35.9 Miles 189,663 Feet $1,200 - $2,000 /
Mile $43,080 - $71,800 $80 / LF $15.2 M 30 years Assumes 10' wide trails
Proposed On-Street
Bikeways 7.9 Miles 41,832 Feet $3,500 / Mile $27,650 30 years Assumes (2) signs every 600'
Existing Sidewalks 31.0 Miles 163,502 Feet $45 / LF $7.4M 15-30 years Assumes a 6' wide sidewalk
Table 4.4 General Operations, Maintenance and Capital Costs
4-12
Operations + Maintenance
today, the city of Farmington maintains 46.8 miles of asphalt trails,
along with 31.0 miles of sidewalks, 1.5 miles of natural surface
trails, boardwalks and pedestrian bridges. these facilities all vary in
anticipated life cycle, and required maintenance.
Snow/Ice Removal
snow and ice removal are key to providing safe access to trails and
sidewalks year-round. in Farmington, residents are responsible for
maintaining clear paths for sidewalks and trails adjacent to or within
their property. the city of Farmington clears trails, sidewalks, and
outdoor rinks that are indicated on the snow removal Plan. this
plan prioritizes sidewalks in downtown, the trail along 195th street,
and trails leading to schools and bus stops.
this plan recommends integrating all newly constructed trails into
the snow removal Plan as necessary. connector and greenway
trails are recommended for future clearing/plowing by the city. an
evaluation of the snow removal Plan should be performed annually
to revise routes and priorities, ensuring that connections to key
community destinations are cleared of snow and ice throughout the
winter.
Pavement Management
in 2012, the city implemented an annual pavement management
program for asphalt trail maintenance. this program has been
successful in providing annual funding for crack and fog sealing of
trails. the city is broken into five areas, resulting in trail maintenance
occurring every five years for each segment.
However, this system may have been put into place too late for
many of the older segments of trails that were installed over 30 years
ago. these sections have deteriorated past a point of repair and will
likely need to be replaced in the coming years. these replaced trails
will then be on-track to receive regular maintenance as part of the
pavement management program.
this plan recommends a phased approach to replacement of
existing trails over the next 5-10 years, along with integrating
existing and future trails into the pavement management program.
the table below shows projected maintenance and capital costs.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-13 imPlementation
Funding Strategies
achieving the vision for a well-connected bicycle and pedestrian
network in Farmington will take significant funding, not only for
construction of new facilities, but also for on-going maintenance of
existing and future facilities.
capital improvement projects in parks and trails have been funded
over the years in Farmington through two funding sources:
»Funds received from residential, commercial and industrial
development, received as cash in-lieu of land through the park
dedication process
»transfers through the city’s municipal liquor store profit
With most capital funding tied to new development, investment
has been inconsistent over the years. most of the Priority Projects,
as identified in this plan, will need to be funded independently of
private development, through collaborative efforts, grants, and
potential increase in funds allocated through the city’s general funds.
General Funds
general funds should be used as a primary source for on-going
maintenance, operations, and amenities for the bike and pedestrian
system. capital improvements can also be funded through general
funds. general funds are often used as a match for grant funding.
Dedicated Tax levy
a city can hold a referendum for a dedicated tax levy with proceeds
directed specifically for parks and recreation. this levy can be
used for capital projects as well as operations and maintenance.
the proceeds may be in place of or supplement general funds.
the advantage of a dedicated tax levy is that parks and recreation
receives a more stable source of funding and does not have to
compete with other city priorities for funding on an annual basis.
Bonding
general obligation Bonds and revenue Bonds provide another
source of implementation funding for new facilities, and in some
cases, can provide funding for repairs and upgrades of existing
facilities.
residents can decide to raise revenue through a permanent or
temporary tax increase dedicated for specific purposes such as park,
trail, and bikeway improvements and maintenance. these funds
are usually provided through bonds approved as part of a voter
referendum.
4-14
State Aid Funds
state aid funds are available for pedestrian and bicycle
improvements on state aid roadways. this funding source
is particularly useful at the time of street construction or re-
construction.
Partnerships
Public and private partnerships have the potential to provide
a wide array of funding opportunities beyond the traditional
municipal models. Partnerships with dakota county have
proven to be successful in building the existing trail network in
Farmington. Further partnerships with Farmington school district,
community education, and local businesses will be important for
implementation of events and programming, and can support future
grant writing efforts as well. organizations with partner funding
can also provide assistance with design, outreach, or maintenance/
stewardship of facilities. Partnerships and relationships with local
businesses can result in easements, use agreements, or donated
funds for future bike and ped facilities.
Donations
Private donations are a potential funding source; these may be
from individuals or area corporations, or donations of labor from
recreation clubs or use agreements. “adopt-a-trail” programs,
memorial bench donations, and incentives for local businesses to
provide bike racks are all examples of how organizations, businesses,
and individuals could help with maintenance and funding, while
raising awareness and enthusiasm of the bike/ped system.
Grants
grant funding throughout dakota county has had a positive impact
on the implementation of local and regional bicycle and pedestrian
network. grant funding generally requires a match by the city, likely
through general funds. grant funding also typically favors larger,
capital projects over maintenance and operations funding. grant
funding might also require evidence of partnerships and community
engagement and support for specific requests. the following are
some grant opportunities that could be pursued for implementation
of plan elements, along with links for more information:
Regional Solicitation Grants for Bike/Ped Facilities
the metropolitan council allocates federal funds through regional
solicitation grants. Funding priorities include multi-use trails,
bicycle facilities, grade-separated crossings, filling network gaps,
intersection/crossing treatments, sidewalks, streetscaping, ada
improvements, and safe routes to school infrastructure projects.
these grants are available on 2-year funding cycle, with the next
solicitation for grant applications anticipated in early 2020.
https://metrocouncil.org/transportation/Planning-2/transportation-
Funding/regional-solicitation-neW.aspx
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-15 imPlementation
local Trail Connections (lTC)
local trail connections grants are administered through mn
dnr. these grants fund relatively short trail connections between
where people live and desired community destinations, and are
not intended for funding significant new trails. Funding prioritizes
projects with significant connectivity, high expected use, and
attractive integration of cultural and natural resources.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/recreation/trails_local.html
Safe Routes to School Grants (MnDOT)
mndot administers grant funding to support safe routes to school
(srts) Planning assistance and plan development to support
schools’ effort to promote safe biking and walking for students on
a daily basis. small micro-grants are occasionally available to fund
educational or encouragement programs such as bike fleets and
bike rodeos. srts Plans are generally used as a foundation for
cities and school districts to apply for srts infrastructure grants.
infrastructure grants support capital funding for projects that
promote and encourage biking and walking to school, such as trails,
sidewalks, and other bike/ped facilities near schools. other example
projects include traffic calming, crosswalk signals, bicycle parking
and ada improvements. srts Planning assistance and infrastructure
grants are generally available on an annual basis.
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/saferoutes/grants-funding.html
MN DNR Natural and Scenic Area Grants
the mn dnr natural and scenic area grants are intended to
protect and provide public access to high quality natural and
scenic areas. example projects include trails, overlooks interpretive
displays, benches, wayfinding and trailhead parking. all projects
must align with the state outdoor recreation Plan (scorP). this
grant is typically available annually, with an application deadline in
early spring.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/land/natural-scenic-app-cycle.html
MN DNR Outdoor Recreation Grants
the mn dnr outdoor recreation grant is intended to fund projects
that increase and enhance outdoor recreation facilities in local and
community parks throughout the state. all projects must align with
the state outdoor recreation Plan (scorP). example projects
include internal park trails and trail amenities. this grant is typically
available annually, with an application deadline in early spring.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/recreation/outdoor_rec.html
TO :Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers
F R O M :Kellee O mlid, Parks and Recreaon D irector
S U B J EC T:Review 2023 Work P lan P rogress
DATE:March 8, 2023
B A C KG R O U N D
The commission’s updated 2023 work plan is included in the meeng packet. S how n in bold red are work
plan items completed either at or since the las t commis s ion meeng held on February 8, 2023. I tems that
are in bold black have been completed.
Commission members s hould be prepared to review the work plan to idenfy any other addional items
that have been completed and then discuss other work plan items it w ould like to work on at future
meengs.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material 2023 Work Plan
FARMINGTON PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
2023 WORK PLAN
Goal #1: Provide to the City Council a recommended 2024-2028 capital improvement plan for
the park improvement fund.
Objectives:
1. By April 1, the Commission will have discussed and identified a preliminary list of five-year
capital improvement projects for the park improvement fund that will include a list of parks,
costs, and schedule to be completed in the years 2024 to 2028.
2. By June 1, the Commission will finalize the five-year capital improvement projects for the years
2024-2028 and make a recommendation to the City Council for approval.
3. By December 31, the improvement projects recommended for funding from 2024-2028 will be
included in the City Council’s approved 2024 final budget.
Goal #2: Participate in a parks and facilities tour with the Rambling River Center Advisory
Board and City Council.
Objectives:
1. By March 1, the Commission, Advisory Board and City Council will have identified a date to
have a tour.
2. By May 1, a draft list of parks and facilities to tour will be reviewed by the Commission.
3. By June 1, a final list of parks and facilities to tour will be approved by the Commission.
4. By October 1, a parks and facilities tour will have occurred.
Goal #3: Participate in a work session with City Council.
Objectives:
1. By February 1, a date to have a work session with City Council will be identified.
2. By May 1, a list of work session topic(s) will be approved by the Commission.
3. By October 1, a work session with City Council will have occurred.
Goal #4: Participate in the process of making improvements at Flagstaff Meadows Park.
Objectives:
1. By January 1, the Commission will have reviewed and approved from the proposals submitted
a vendor to purchase and install the playground equipment and will make a recommendation to
City Council to approve the vendor selected.
Status: Completed. At their December 14, 2022 meeting, commission selected and
recommended a vendor to purchase and install the playground equipment.
2. By February 1, City Council will have approved the purchase and installation of the new
playground equipment.
Status: Completed. City council approved the purchase and installation at their
December 19, 2022 meeting,
3. By February 1, the Commission will have reviewed and approved the shade structure designs
and colors and will make a recommendation to City Council to approve the purchase.
4. By March 1, City Council will have approved the purchase and installation of the new shade
structure.
5. By August 1, installation of the new playground equipment and shade structure will have been
completed.
6. By October 31, a ribbon cutting will have been completed for the new park.
Goal #5: Identify Bike Pedestrian Plan Priorities to Accomplish in 2023.
Objectives:
1. By March 31, the Commission will have reviewed the priorities identified in the Bike
Pedestrian Plan.
2. By May 15, the Commission will have developed and approved a list of priorities to work on
and complete in 2023.
3. By December 31, Commission members will have worked with staff to accomplish the Bike
Pedestrian Plan priorities it identified to complete.
Goal #6: Participate in the process of making improvements at Rambling River Park.
Objectives:
1. By February 1, the Commission will have provided input on the scope of services for
completing a new master plan for Rambling River Park. City council will have approved a
consultant to develop the new master plan.
2. By March 1, the Commission will have given input on potential improvements (i.e. playground
equipment, tennis courts / pickleball courts, skate park, etc.) to be included in the master plan.
3. By June 15, a preliminary draft master plan for the park with cost estimates will be reviewed by
the Commission and feedback given to the consultant on any revisions to be made to the master
plan.
4. By August 1, a final master plan with cost estimates will have been reviewed by the
Commission and a recommendation for approval and funding forwarded to the City Council.
5. By September 1, City Council will have approved a master plan for the park.
Goal #7: Host food truck events in the spring and fall with Empire Township’s Parks and
Recreation Commission.
Objectives:
1. By January 1, the date and location for the spring food truck event will be approved.
Status: Completed. Friday, May 19 from 5 to 8 p.m. in Empire Township at Stelzel Ballfields
was approved for the spring food truck event at the joint meeting on October 10, 2022.
2. By April 1, the date and location of the fall food truck event will be approved. Commission will
also have decided who will contact the food trucks to see if they are interested in participating.
3. By May 15, Commission members will have decided who will help at what times with the spring
food truck event.
4. By May 31, the spring food truck event will have happened.
5. By September 1, Commission members will have decided who will help at what times with the
fall food truck event.
6. By September 30, the fall food truck event will have happened.
7. By October 31, the commissions will have jointly discussed and evaluated the spring and fall
food truck events.
Goal #8: Continue to build and strengthen relationships with Empire Township’s Park and
Recreation Commission (ETPRC).
Objectives:
1. By July 1, a date for the joint meeting with ETPRC will be set.
2. By August 1, discuss and formulate a list of discussion topics for a joint meeting agenda with
ETPRC.
3. By September 1, approve a list of discussion topics for a joint meeting agenda with ETPRC.
4. By December 1, a meeting will have been held with ETPRC.
Goal #9: Receive periodic presentations from each of the parks and recreation department’s
professional staff members about programs, parks, facilities and trails and a presentation from
the Finance Director on the budget and a presentation from the Planning Manager on new
housing and business developments.
Objectives:
1. By April 15, Commission members will have received a presentation from the Finance Director
on the city’s budget and funding sources.
2. By May 15, the Commission will have received a presentation by professional staff members of
the Department’s 2022 Annual Report.
3. By June 15, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff on the results of
the Schmitz-Maki Arena’s winter ice season.
4. By July 15, Commission members will have received a presentation from the Planning
Manager on current and future developments.
5. By September 15, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff on the first
half operations of the Rambling River Center.
6. By October 15, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff on the results
of the summer programs offered.
7. By December 15, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff about the
spring turf season and summer ice season.
8. By December 15, the Commission will have received a presentation from staff about
maintenance and improvements to parks and trails.
TO :Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers
F R O M :Kellee O mlid, Parks and Recreaon D irector
S U B J EC T:Round Table Format
DATE:March 8, 2023
B A C KG R O U N D
The round table agenda item allows commission members to s hare informaon or ask s taff about items
not on the agenda. No formal decisions are made during this agenda item.
TO :Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers
F R O M :Kellee O mlid, Parks and Recreaon D irector
S U B J EC T:I nformaonal Updates
DATE:March 8, 2023
B A C KG R O U N D
This agenda item is an opportunity for s taff to provide informaonal updates to commis s ion members.
These items are informaonal only and no formal decis ion can be made during this agenda item.
S taff w ill provide an update during the meeng about the follow ing:
1. Park D edicaon S tudy
2. Rambling River Park M aster P lan
3. Emerald A s h Borer in Parks
4. Economic D evelopment I niave – C ommunity P roject F unding
5. F iber P rojects in Parks
6. S hade S tructure for F lags taff Meadows Park
TO :Farmington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers
F R O M :Kellee O mlid, Parks and Recreaon D irector
S U B J EC T:Pos s ible I tems for A pril 12, 2023 M eeng A genda
DATE:March 8, 2023
B A C KG R O U N D
The following are possible topics s taff has idenfied for commission to consider for its A pril 12, 2023
meeng agenda:
Parks and Recreaon C ommis s ion P hoto
P resentaon on City's Budget and F unding S ources
2023 Work P lan Review
Rambling River Park M aster P lan
Park D edicaon S tudy
Recommend P urchase of S hade S tructure for F lags taff Meadows Park
Commission members s hould come prepared to idenfy other pos s ible topics for the A pril 12, 2023
meeng agenda.