The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02.12.20 Parks and Rec Packet M eeng Locaon : Farmin gton C ity H all 430 T hird Street Farmin gton, M N 55024 PA R K S AN D RE C R E AT I O N R E G U L A R M E E T I NG A G E NDA February 12, 2020 7:00 P M 1.C all M e e ng to O rde r 2.A pprove M eeng A genda 3.A pprove M eeng M inutes (a)A ppr ove January 8, 2020 M eeng Minutes 4.P re s e ntaons (a)P ublic Comments 5.B us iness It e ms (a)C hair and V ice-Chair Elecons (b)C ommis s ion By laws 6.D is cus s ion It e ms (a)2020 Work P lan Review (b)B ike Pedestrian P lan P riories (c)C ity C ommunicaon P roces s es P res entaon (d)O pen Meeng L aw Review (e )Review Work S es s ion w ith C ity C ouncil 7.C ommis s ion Roundtable (a)Round Table Format 8.S taff Re port /Updates (a)I nformaonal U pdates 9.M e e ng A ge nda Topics (a)Topics for March 11, 2020 M eeng A genda 10.A djournme nt "The F armingt on Parks and Recreaon A dvisory C ommission's mission is t o advise and make recommendaons to t he F armington C ity C ouncil concerning the comprehensive planning of the C ity parks, trails, open space, recreaon facilies and recreaon programs." TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:A ppr ove January 8, 2020 M eeng Minutes DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D A"ached are the dra$ minutes from the Par k and Recr eaon C ommis s ion's J anuary 8 , 2020 meeng. Commission members are asked to review the minutes and provide at the meeng any correcons or addions to the minutes that are needed. AT TAC HMENT S : Type Desc rip tion Backup Material Draft January 8, 2020 Meeting Minutes Farmington Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes from the January 8, 2020 Regular Meeting Members Present: Laurie Suchanek, David McMillen, Elizabeth Koss, Ashley Crabtree and Brian Tennant Members Absent: None Other’s Present: Parks and Recreation Director Randy Distad I. Call Meeting To Order Chair Suchanek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Quorum was present. II. Approval of January 8, 2020 Meeting Agenda Moved by McMillen and seconded by Crabtree to approve the meeting agenda. All persons in favor (APIF). Motion carried. III. Approval of December 11, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes The meeting minutes were approved with no revisions identified. IV. Presentations None V. Business Items A. Approve 2019 Work Plan Commission members reviewed the work plan and made no further revisions to the final work plan. Moved by Crabtree and seconded by Koss to approve the completed 2019 work plan. APIF. Motion carried. B. Approve 2020 Work Plan Director Distad reviewed the draft work plan developed by the Commission. There were no further additions or deletions to the work plan. Moved by Tennant and seconded by Koss to approve the Commission’s 2020 work plan. APIF. Motion carried. C. Possible Agenda Topics for Joint Meeting with City Council Director Distad shared that the city council is planning to meet with the Commission during its February 10, 2020 work session. He shared this meeting will be an opportunity for the Commission to have a conversation with the city council about park and recreation items. Because there will be other items on the agenda, so he suggested the Commission come up with one key topic they would like to discuss with the city council. Commission members by consensus felt it was important for them to have a conversation with the city council about the development of Jim Bell Park and Preserve including when this park could be developed and how the development of the park could/should be funded. Director Distad reminded Commission members there is an approved master plan for the park. Commission members shared what kind of improvements they would like to see occur in the park. VI. Discussion Items A. Chair and Vice-Chair Elections Director Distad shared with Commission members that at the February meeting, elections would occur and members should consider, prior to the meeting, if they would be interested in either of the positions. Then when elections occur at the meeting, members should indicate their interest when election nominations occur for each position. B. Discuss City Communication Process Presentation Director Distad reminded Commission members this item is one of the goals it set for itself in 2020. He asked the Commission to discuss and determine a date for the presentation and what information Commission members would like to receive during the presentation. Once the Commission has given input on both, then he will contact the city’s Communication Specialist Lauren Siebenaler to see if she is available to attend on the date the Commission identified and provide to the Commission information they would like to receive during the presentation. Commission members determined the following for the presentation: • How the city uses social media to promote events, programs, volunteer opportunities, etc. to the public • The timing of when information is shared with the public about events, programs and other city information • How the city tries to reach people who aren’t connected with devices, or don’t take the time to learn about what is going on in the city Director Distad stated he would contact Ms. Siebenaler and confirm the April 8 meeting will work for her to attend and also share with her what kind of information the Commission would like to receive during her presentation. C. Discuss Process to Name the Neighborhood Park in the Fairhill Estate at North Creek Development Director Distad reviewed the park naming policy with the Commission. He shared there are several different methods that could be used to name the park. He shared the Commission has used a public naming process in the past and it has been successful getting people to participate. He also made Commission members aware that the park is currently not graded nor will it be developed until 50% of the development is constructed. Crabtree shared she would like to have the neighborhood in the development involved in naming the park. Director Distad stated it will be a few years before the development reaches the 50% construction phase. This would mean the park naming contest would have to be postponed for a few years. The Commission by consensus determined it would like to wait until the development is 50% constructed and then have a park naming contest with the residents who live in the development. It was suggested that this goal would be identified to occur in 2021 so it has a placeholder to remind Commission members about naming the park even though it will likely be later than 2021 before the development is 50% constructed. D. Review Sample Bylaws Director Distad reviewed the bylaw samples that were included in the meeting packet and asked if Commission members had a preference to use any one of the format and content of the sample bylaws provided. McMillen shared he liked the Bullhead City sample. Koss liked the Marble Falls sample. Tennant share he thought the bylaws could include a blend of all the samples. He shared that he would be willing to put together an outline for the Commission’s bylaws and share it at the February meeting to receive feedback from Commission members. Commission members by consensus felt this was a good idea to have Tennant create an outline of the bylaws. Director Distad shared with Tennant that he would need the bylaws outline on or before Thursday, February 6 in order for it to be included in the meeting packet. Tennant shared he would do this. VII. Commission Roundtable Tennant: Didn’t have anything to share. Crabtree: Didn’t have anything to share. Koss: Asked if she could receive a copy of the Jim Bell Park and Preserve master plan. Director Distad shared that all of the individual park master plans are available on the city’s website. Suchanek: Didn’t have anything to share. McMillen: Reminded Commission members about the Rambling River Center steak fry fundraiser being held at the Farmington VFW on Saturday, January 18, 2018 from 5:00-8:00 p.m. He also reminded everyone about the Community Expo that is being held at the Farmington High School on Saturday, February 25 from 9:00 a.m. to noon. VIII. Staff Report Director Distad provided the following information on the following topics: A. Outdoor Rinks • Shared the outdoor rinks are open with the exception of the pleasure rinks at the two elementary schools. He made the Commission aware that the weather has been a bit of a roller coaster with temperatures being sometimes too cold or too warm to skate. B. Arena Projects • Railing modification project had a few issues with the railings not being fabricate to meet the ADA and building code standards, so they will have to be removed and altered to meet the code requirements. He is hopeful this work can be completed by the end of January. • Staff members have been working with Wold Architects and Engineers staff on finalizing the construction plans to relocate the Zamboni resurfacer. He is hopeful bids can be opened in late February or early March, so the project can stay on schedule to be completed between mid-March to early June when the ice has been removed. IX. February 12, 2020 Meeting Agenda Items The following items were tentatively identified by Commission members for its January 8, 2020 meeting agenda: 1. 2020 work plan review 2. Chair and vice-chair elections 3. Commission by-laws outline 4. Review meeting with city council 5. City communication presentation discussion 6. Bike Pedestrian Plan priorities review 7. Volunteerism in Parks and Recreation Department X. Adjournment Moved by McMillen and seconded by Crabtree to adjourn the meeting. APIF. Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 8:03 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Randy Distad Parks and Recreation Director and Recording Secretary TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:P ublic Comments DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D O ccasionally s omeone fr om the public has comments to share w ith the C ommis s ion. I n the past there has not been a place on the agenda idenfied for public comments . A s a r es ult, s taff felt that the pres entaon par t of the agenda would serve as an opportunity to receive comments from the public. T he chair of the C ommis s ion s hould verbally idenfy during the pres entaon agenda item that this is the me for anyone from the public to provide their comments to the C ommis s ion. I t is important to limit the amount of me that comments can be provided. The City Council allow s up to 5 minutes for a person to prov ide comments to them. T he C ity C ouncil nor mally does not res pond w hile the comments are being prov ided. The C ommis s ion may w ant to cons ider follow ing the s ame proces s the C ity C ouncil us es when public comments ar e pr ovided. T he C ommis s ion s hould take the comments under adv is ement, but s hould not make any decisions either during, or a+er the comments hav e been prov ided. T he C ommis s ion may als o want to address how public comments ar e addres s ed during the meeng as part of its bylaws. TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:C hair and V ice-Chair E lecons DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D A nnually a chair and v ice-chair are elected by the C ommission at its Februar y meeng. C urrent Commission C hair S uchanek w ill be calling for nominaons for the chair pos ion. O nce the chair posion is elected, then the pers on elected w ill call for v ice-chair nominaons . I have also a+ached s ome informaon about the proces s of nominang and elecng the chair and vice- chair pos ions . W hile the process idenfied in the informaon does not need to be necessarily follow ed verbam, it does pr ovide a good framew or k in which to conduct the chair and vice-chair elecons. AT TAC HMENT S : Type Desc rip tion Backup Material Chair and Vice-Chair Nomination Process Information TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:C ommis s ion Bylaws DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D At the January 8 , 2020 meeng Commission member Tennant v olunteered to put together an outline for the C ommis s ion's by laws . T he outline created by C ommission member Tennant is a*ached for review by the C ommis s ion. C ommission members s hould come pr epared to dis cus s the bylaw s outline and then make any revis ion it would like to the dra+ bylaw s , s o a final dra+ can be review ed and approved at the next C ommis s ion meeng. AT TAC HMENT S : Type Desc rip tion Backup Material Draft Commission Bylaws BY-LAWS OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA SCOPE The Farmington Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission's mission is to advise and make recommendations to the Farmington City Council concerning the comprehensive planning of the City parks, trails, open space, recreation facilities and recreation programs ARTICLE I: COMMISSION RULES Section 1: Purpose The "Farmington Parks and Recreation Commission" hereinafter referred to as the Commission, shall be composed of five (5) regular members. The duties of the said Commission shall be to advise and recommend to the City Council on all matters to the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the city parks, recreation programs and trail systems for the City of Farmington and to carry out other duties as may be assigned by the City Council. Section 2: Appointment: Tenure The regular members of such Commission shall be appointed by the Farmington City Council. Unless terminated as provided below, they shall hold their office for a term of three (3) years, with two (2) of the regular members terms expiring on odd numbered years and the other three (3) of the regular members terms expiring on even numbered years. All members must be residents of the City of Farmington, and cannot serve on plural City commissions simultaneously. Compensation shall be provided at the rate of $30 per meeting attended. Payable at the end of the calendar year. Section 3: Commission Absences In order to maintain maximum participation of all appointed Commission members at all regularly scheduled meetings, the following attendance guide and Commissioner replacement policy for “excused” or “unexcused” should be implemented: a. When appointed, each Commissioner should state their willingness and intention to attend each scheduled meeting of the Commission. b. In the event of unplanned personal matters, business trips, family vacation trips, changed job requirements, sickness, or other physical disabilities that prohibit the commissioner from attending the scheduled meeting; the Commission, professional staff of the City, or the Commission Chairperson should be notified as early as possible prior to the start hour of their inability to attend the scheduled meeting. The Commission member upon this notification will receive an “excused absence” for the involved scheduled meeting. c. There will be a limit of three (3) consecutive “excused absences” or two (2) consecutive “unexcused absences” for any member of the Commission. If any member exceeds the above criteria for consecutive absences, the Commissioner will be recommended for dismissal unless extenuating circumstances exist. d. If any Commission member is absent, whether excused or not, from any five (5) scheduled monthly Commission meetings, whether consecutive or not, during any one year period, the commissioner will be recommended for dismissal unless extenuating circumstances exist. e. The recommendation for dismissal as required will be initiated by City staff and forwarded on to the City Council for official action. Section 4: Organization Said Commission is authorized to establish its own constitution and by -laws as may be deemed proper, not inconsistent with the ordinances of the city and laws of the state; and shall provide for regular and special meetings necessary to carry on its own business, separate and apart from the City of Farmington, except as herein provided. Section 5: Limitations The Commission shall not be authorized to incur on behalf of the City of Farmington, any expense incident to the operation of said parks and recreation programs, unless expressly authorized to do so by the City Council. The Commission shall not knowingly conduct business that has been assigned by ordinance to any other governing or advisory body of the City of Farmington. ARTICLE II: MEETINGS Section 1: Regular Meetings Regular meetings shall be held on the second Wednesday of each month, at the hour of 7:00pm unless otherwise stated in the meeting agenda. Section 2: Notice of Meetings Notice of all regular Commission meetings shall be delivered via e -mail to each member of the Commission at least seventy-two hours prior to each meeting. Notice of all meetings shall be posted at City Hall and delivered to the news media in compliance with all state and local laws. Section 3: Special Meetings Special meetings may be called at anytime by the Parks and Recreation Director for the purpose of additional business or meeting with other governing bodies. Section 4: Place of meeting Regular meetings will be held in the Farmington City Hall council chambers unless otherwise stated in the meeting agenda Section 5: Quorum Attendance of at least three (3) of the currently appointed members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum. Section 6: Rules of Order General parliamentary rules, as given in Robert's Rules of Order, as modified by the rules and regulations of the Commission shall be observed in conducting meetings of the Commission. Section 7: Order of Business The following shall be the Order of Business of the Commission, but the rules of order may be suspended and any matters considered or postponed by the action of the Commission. 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Meeting Agenda 3. Approve Meeting Minutes from prior session 4. Business Items 5. Discussion Items 6. Commission Roundtable 7. Staff Report/Updates 8. Meeting Agenda Topics 9. Adjournment Section 7: Proceedings All proceedings, decisions and resolutions of the Commission shall be initiated by a motion Section 8: Voting An affirmative vote of a majority of those present shall be necessary to pass any motion involving the adoption or amending of plans, policy statements, or recommendations to the Council. Voting shall be by voice vote and shall not be recorded as individual ayes or nays unless requested by a member of the Commission, in which case the Chairperson shall order the vote to be so recorded except that any member may abstain by so declaring prior to vote. An abstention may only be made in the case of a conflict of interest; it is otherwise the duty of all Commissioners present to participate in the vote. ARTICLE III: OFFICERS Section 1: Appointment of Officers The Commission shall elect from its members a Chair and a Vice-Chair from among its membership, and each officer shall hold office for one year or until replaced by a simple majority vote of the Commission. Section 2: Duties of Chair of the Commission The Chair of the Commission shall preside at the meetings of the Commission, and shall perform the other duties ordinarily performed by that officer. Section 3: Duties of the Vice-Chair of the Commission The Vice-Chair of the Commission, in the absence of the Chair, shall perform all duties of the Chair of the Commission. Section 4: Duties of the Parks and Recreation Director The Parks and Recreation Director shall not be a member of the Commission. The Director shall attend all regular meetings and will be responsible for preparing the agenda for regular and special meetings and recording meeting minutes. ARTICLE IV: COMMITTEES OF THE COMMISSION Section 1: Appointment of Special Sub-Committees Special Sub-Committees shall be appointed by the Chair for consideration and study of any matter not covered by the Commission during regular or special meetings. The special committee shall report their findings to the Commission. ARTICLE V: AMENDMENTS Section 1: Amendments The by-laws may be amended at any regular meeting of the commission by a majority vote of the members present, provided previous notice of the nature of any proposed amendment shall have been given at least one regular meeting before the action thereon shall be taken. The By-laws shall be automatically amended by any future ordinances passed by the City Council dealing with matters relating to or applicable to the Parks and Recreation Commission. TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:2020 Work P lan Review DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D T he C ommis s ion's 2020 work plan is included in the meeng packet. S how n in bold red are work plan items completed s ince the last C ommis s ion meeng. C ommis s ion member s s hould come to the meeng to review the w ork plan to idenfy if any other addional items have been completed and then discuss other w ork plan items it w ould like to work on at futur e meengs . AT TAC HMENT S : Type Desc rip tion Backup Material Updated 2020 Work Plan FARMINGTON PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2020 WORK PLAN Goal #1: Provide to the City Council a recommended 2021-2025 capital improvement plan for the park improvement fund. Objectives: 1. By April 1, the Commission will have discussed and identified a preliminary list of five-year capital improvement projects for the park improvement fund that will include a list of parks, costs and schedule to be completed in the years 2021 to 2025. 2. By June 1, the Commission will finalize the five-year capital improvement projects for the years 2021-2025 and make a recommendation to the City Council for approval. 3. By September 15, the improvement projects recommended for funding from 2021-2025 will be included in the City Council approved 2021 preliminary budget. Goal #2: Create Commission By-Laws. Objectives: 1. By March 1, a review of sample by-laws from other commission/boards will have occurred. 2. By May 31, a draft of the Commission’s by-laws will have been reviewed. 3. By July 31, a final draft of the Commission’s by-laws will be reviewed and approved. 4. By October 31, the Commissions by-laws will have been reviewed by the City Council and approved. Goal #3: Participate in a Parks and Facilities Tour with the Rambling River Center Advisory Board. Objectives: 1. By April 1, the Commission and Advisory Board will have identified a date to have a tour. 2. By May 1, a draft list of parks and facilities to tour will be reviewed by the Commission and Advisory Board. 3. By July 15 a final list of parks and facilities to tour will be approved by the Commission and Advisory Board. 4. By October 1, a parks and facilities tour will have occurred. Goal #4: Work with the Developer on Naming the Neighborhood Park in the Fairhill Estate at North Creek Development. Objectives: 1. By March1, the Commission will have discussed option with the developer on how to determine the name of the park. Status: Completed. Because the park has not been graded yet, it was decided at the January 8 Commission meeting to postpone the naming of the park until 50% of the development is built and then possible park names would be solicited from residents who live in the development. 2. By May1, the Commission will have implemented the option selected to name the park. Status: Not completed until 50% of the development is constructed 3. By September 1, possible park names will have been identified. Status: Not completed until 50% of the development is constructed 4. By October 31, a final name for the park will be selected by the Commission and the name forwarded to the city council for approval. Status: Not completed until 50% of the development is constructed 5. By December 31, the city council will approve the name of the neighborhood park in the development. Status: Not completed until 50% of the development is constructed Goal #5: Meet with the City Council. Objectives: 1. By February 1, the Commission and city council will have identified a date to meet. Status: Completed. A date of February 10, 2020 was approved to meet. 2. By February 29, possible agenda items will be identified for the meeting. Status: Completed. The item to discuss with the City Council was identified as the development of Jim Bell Park and Preserve. 3. By June 1, the Commission will have met with the City Council. Status: Completed. The Commission will be meeting with the City Council on February 10 and will be debriefing the meeting at its February 12, meeting. Goal #6: Learn about the City’s Various Communication Tools and Process Used to Keep the Public Informed. Objectives: 1. By February 15, the Commission will develop a series of topics and questions about city communications, so they can be provided to the city’s Communication Specialist as an aid in the development of a future presentation to the Commission. Status: Partially completed. Preliminary presentation topics were identified at the January 8 meeting, but discussion about additional topics will be discussed at the February and March meetings. 2. By March 31, a meeting date will be identified for the Communication Specialist to attend a Commission meeting and make a presentation about the city’s communication tools and process. Status: Completed. April 8 meeting was identified. 3. By July 31, a presentation to the Commission by the city’s Communication Specialist will have occurred. Goal #7: Receive periodic presentations from each of the Parks and Recreation professional staff members about programs, parks, facilities and trails. Objectives: 1. By March 15, the Commission will have received a presentation by professional staff members of the Department’s 2019 Annual Report. 2. By June1, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff on the results of the Schmitz-Maki Arena’s winter ice season. 3. By August 1, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff on the first half operations of the Rambling River Center. 4. By October 1, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff on the results of the summer programs offered. 5. By November 1, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff about the spring turf season and summer ice season. 6. By November 1, the Commission will have received a presentation from staff about maintenance and improvements to parks and trails Goal #8: Identify Bike Pedestrian Plan Priorities to Accomplish in 2020 and 2021. Objectives: 1. By March 31, the Commission will review the priorities identified in the Bike Pedestrian Plan. 2. By June 1, a draft list of priorities to work on and accomplish in 2020 and 2021 will be developed by the Commission. 3. By August 31, Commission members will have identified and approved a recommended final list of priorities to accomplish in 2020 and 2021 and will have forwarded the recommended list to the City Council. 4. By November 1, the City Council will review and approve a final list of priorities to accomplish in the city’s Bike Pedestrian Plan. Goal #9: Promote and Encourage Volunteerism in the Parks and Recreation Department. Objectives: 1. By April 30, the Commission will have received a presentation on how volunteerism is structured and what opportunities are currently available in the Parks and Recreation Department. 2. By July 1, the Commission will have reviewed the volunteer opportunities available to the public and determined if there are other volunteer opportunities to offer to the public. 3. By August 31, the Commission will have discussed different ways and opportunities to promote volunteerism in the parks and recreation department. 4. By October 31, volunteer opportunities in the parks and recreation department will be promoted. TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:B ike Pedestrian P lan P r iories DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D O ne of the Commis s ion's 2 0 2 0 w ork plan goals is to review the approved Bike Pedes trian P lan in order to determine if ther e are any priories that can be w orked on by the Commis s ion in the coming year. I hav e a(ached the approv ed Bike Pedestrian P lan, s o y ou can familiarize yours elf w ith the plan and als o review w hat priories w er e idenfied in the plan, s o a dis cus s ion can occur about w hat prior ity the Commission w ould like to s ee implemented in the future. AT TAC HMENT S : Type Desc rip tion Backup Material Adopted Bike Pedestrian Plan FARMINGTON BIKE + PED PLAN June 17, 2019 ii Prepared by: Funding provided by: Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Project Manager: Randy Distad, CPRP Farmington Parks and Recreation Director City of Farmington 430 Third St. Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: 651-280-6851 Email: rdistad@farmingtonmn.gov Acknowledgements: The City of Farmington Dakota County Public Health Department Minnesota Department of Health Members of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Committee: Dan Miller, Randy Distad, Laurie Suchanek, Amy Morgan, Krista Tesky, Phil Windschitl, Kate Matusinec, Kyle Anderson, Tony Wippler, Ryan Hayes, Gary Rutherford, Pennie Page This plan was adopted by the City of Farmington on June 17, 2019. Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 01 INTRODUCTION 1-1 Plan and Project Purpose 1-2 Why Plan for Biking and Walking Today? 1-2 Plan Objectives 1-4 Plan Funding 1-5 Project Timeline 1-7 02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-1 Farmington in Context 2-2 Existing Travel Behavior and Characteristics 2-4 Relevant Plan Review 2-8 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network 2-14 Level of Traffic Stress Analysis 2-16 Community Engagement Phase 1 2-25 Community Engagement Phase 2 2-28 03 NETwORk PlAN 3-1 System Goals 3-2 Draft Network Plan 3-2 Network Plan Elements 3-4 Intersection Treatments 3-9 System Recommendations 3-11 04 IMPlEMENTATION 4-1 Implementation Plan 4-2 Implementation Recommendations 4-2 Phasing Strategy 4-4 Operations + Maintenance 4-12 Funding Strategies 4-13 TABLE OF Contents Fa r m i n g t o n B ik e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n iii Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1-2 Plan and Project Purpose 1-2 Why Plan for Biking and Walking Today? 1-4 Plan Objectives 1-5 Plan Funding 1-7 Project Timeline Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 1-1 introduction 1-2 Plan and Project Purpose the following serve as the purpose of the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. »to addresses the future of a city-wide bicycle and pedestrian network, building off of the existing network. »to incorporate community feedback and community desires towards bicycle and pedestrian goals and while being balanced with city staff recommendations and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan committee feedback. »to identify best practices and guide the city in future facility and network investments. »to guide policy and programming improvements, such as wayfinding, bike parking and educational/encouragement activities. why Plan for Biking and walking Today? over time, the purposes for biking and walking have changed dramatically. Walking is the original form of transportation. it has always been the cheapest and most environmentally friendly way of getting around. the introduction of the bicycle in the early 1800’s carried many of the same benefits and allowed people to travel more efficiently, faster, and longer distances. after the advent of the personal automobile and its increased popularity in the 1920s and 30s, biking and walking for transportation purposes began to decline and was seen mostly for sport, exercise, or recreational purposes. today, biking and walking is again become more popular for multiple purposes as many people are recognizing the importance of living an active and healthy lifestyle. the following are some key reasons for planning for the future bicyclists and pedestrians in Farmington. »Safety: evidence suggests that high-bicycling-mode-share cities are not only safer for bicyclists but for all road users. Further, bike facilities themselves act as “calming” mechanisms on traffic, slowing cars and reducing fatalities1. »Livability + Mobility: Fifty percent of u.s. residents say that walkability is a top priority or high priority when considering where to live2. Bicycling has become the country’s fastest-growing form of transportation for commuters. 1 University of Colorado Denver. (2019, May 29). Cycling lanes reduce fatalities for all road users, study shows: Roads are safer for motorists, pedestrians and cyclists in cities with robust bike facilities. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 31, 2019 from www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/2019/05/190529113036.htm 2 Urban Land Institute: America in 2015: A ULI Survey of Views on Housing, Transportation, and Community. Washington, D.C.: the Urban Land Institute, 2015. Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 1-3 introduction »Health: the cost of obesity in minnesota is $3.2 billion per year3. improving streetscapes and biking and walking facilities ensures that all community members can walk and bike safely and conveniently throughout the day. »Household and Community Prosperity: according to aaa, it costs an average of $8,849 to operate the average car for 2018, or about $737 per month4. not all households can afford to own a car and some lower income households who do own a car because they feel that is the only way to get around may be sacrificing other basic needs in order to get by. »Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: the transportation sector generates the largest share (28.9%) of greenhouse gas emissions5. Walking or cycling could realistically substitute for 41% of short car trips (less than 3 miles), saving nearly 5% of co2e emissions from car travel6. »Recreation: trails and greenways provide facilities for recreational purposes. trails provide a unique facility to serve a diverse population of a community that may otherwise have limited opportunities to access natural areas due to financial or transportation constraints. »Parking and Transportation Networks: as more people bike and walk to destinations such as retail, restaurants, entertainment, and work, the demand for vehicle parking decreases, allowing buildings to be closer to each other and become even more walkable. encouraging active transportation and bringing travel origins and destinations closer together can help alleviate traffic congestion7. »Regional Economic Competitiveness / Tourism: as bicycling and walking networks have grown, so have active transportation– oriented developments and bike-friendly businesses. numerous studies have shown that real estate values increase with proximity to bicycle paths and walking trails. Bike lanes also help companies score talented workers8. »Sustainability / Resilience: Because biking and walking doesn’t 3 Trogdon JG, Finkelstein EA, Feagan CW, Cohen JW. State‐and Payer‐Specific Estimates of Annual Medical Expenditures Attributable to Obesity. Obesity. 2012; 20(1):214-20 [Figure adjusted for inflation using 2017 dollars] 4 Your Driving Costs: How Much Are You Really Paying to Drive? [Brochure]. (2018 Edition) Heathrow, FL: AAA Association Communication 5 U.S. EPA’s Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2017. https:// www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks 6 Neves, A., & Brand, C. (2018, August 31). Assessing the potential for carbon emissions savings from replacing short car trips with walking and cycling using a mixed GPS-travel diary approach. Retrieved May 31, 2019, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0965856417316117 7 Wen, Liang; Kenworthy, Jeff; Guo, Xiumei; Marinova, Dora. 2019. “Solving Traffic Congestion through Street Renaissance: A Perspective from Dense Asian Cities.” Urban Sci. 3, no. 1: 18. 8 “Protected Bike Lanes Mean Business,” by PeopleforBikes and the Alliance for Biking & Walking The amount of space 69 people occupy on bike, on-foot, and in 60 cars. Source: Cycling Promotion Fund 1-4 rely on burning fossil fuels they are more resilient to swings in fuel prices and are far cheaper to repair. From a sustainability perspective, bicycles can be produced for a fraction of the materials, energy, and shipping costs of a car. Biking and walk also saves taxpayers money by reducing road wear. a 20-pound bicycle causes less wear on the pavement than a two-ton vehicle. Plan Objectives the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan focuses on a variety of objectives to holistically address bicycle and pedestrian issues. objectives focus on physical infrastructure improvements, programmatic solutions, and policy-driven decisions. the following 13 objectives, broken down into five categories help guide the direction of the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. Facilities / Infrastructure »Fill network gaps, address problem intersections and barriers »Find ways to make biking and walking safe, convenient, and easy »define trail, sidewalk, and facility standards that are reasonable, enforceable, and sustainable for the city of Farmington Address a Variety of Users »define a cohesive, connected walking and biking network in Farmington that meets the needs of: -Commuters -Recreational bicyclists, hikers -People with disabilities -People who don’t have the ability or interest in driving -People who use public transportation -Children, young people -Seniors Make Connections »Better connect residents and visitors of Farmington to: -Parks -Schools -Community Destinations -Employment Centers -Commercial Centers + Businesses -Neighborhoods Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 1-5 introduction Encourage / Educate »identify programs and initiatives to support walking and biking in Farmington. »Promote active living »identify ways to make biking, walking, and other passive forms of exercise part of daily routines Prioritize and Implement »define community goals and a vision for the future of walking and biking in Farmington »recommend strategies for phasing and implementation of the Plan »identify ‘champions’ or stewards for recommendations that can’t be addressed by the city alone »design the plan and plan process to assist with future fund-raising or grant-writing »identify priority projects, projects that can be started right away Plan Funding to create this plan, the city received grant funding from the dakota county Health department through funding it receives from the statewide Health improvement Partnership (sHiP) grant program from the minnesota department of Health. the city of Farmington and dakota county have a history of working collaboratively on the design and construction of trails and sidewalks within dakota county rights-of-way. in the last ten years, the city and the county have worked together to develop approved regional greenway master plans that will eventually connect the city to the county’s regional park and trail system. also as a result of the collaboration, 13 miles of trail, or approximately 30% of the exiting trail system in Farmington is within dakota county rights-of-way. sHiP supports community-driven solutions to expand opportunities for active living, healthy eating and commercial tobacco-free living. minnesota communities are working with sHiP to promote active transportation to provide safe and convenient opportunities for physical activity. active transportation can be encouraged through: »sidewalks, walking paths and bike facilities »safe and convenient pedestrian street crossing features such as crosswalks, stop signs, stop lights and other street crossing elements »motorist traffic calming and speed-reduction measures 1-6 TASK NOV ‘18 DEC JAN ‘19 FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE 1: Organize the Effort 1.1 Kick off meeting + system tour 1.2 Develop project outreach materials 1.3 Develop Community Engagement Plan 1.4 Develop and launch community survey 1.5 Stakeholder Listening Sessions 2: Inventory and Analysis 2.1 Assemble Background Data 2.2 Review Relevant Plans 2.3 Perform System Analysis 2.4 City Staff Meeting: Go-To Meeting 2.5 BPP Committee Meeting #1 2.6 Community Open House #1 2.7 Process community feedback 2.8 Prepare Existing Conditions Report 3: Plan and System Recommendations 3.1 Develop Draft Plan Framework 3.2 Develop System Plan + Recommendations 3.3 Staff Workshop 3.4 BPP Committee #2 3.5 City Staff Meeting: Go-To Meeting 3.6 Community Open House#2 3.7 Develop and launch community survey 4: Final Plan + Deliverables 4.1 Revision of Draft Plan 4.2 Final Draft Document + Action Plan 4.3 BPP Committee #3 4.4 City Staff Meeting 4.5 Council, Planning and Parks Commission Joint Workshop 4.6 City Council Final Presentation + Approval 4.7 Final Document deliverables Meeting Key City Staff Meeting (5 total) Community Survey (2 total) BPP Committee Meeting (3 total)City Council/Commission Meeting (3-4 total) Community Open House (2 total) End date: Feb. 1st Revised 3/19/19Farmington Bike + Ped PlanFigure 1.1 Project Timeline Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 1-7 introduction »street landscaping and pedestrian-level street lighting »Bike racks, lockers, or other bike parking and storage facilities »land use development patterns to locate homes, work sites, schools, stores and other community services and amenities within reasonable walking distances (pedestrian-oriented development) and within easy access to transit (transit-oriented development) »signage that helps pedestrians and bicyclists navigate to their destinations. Project Timeline the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian plan was completed over an eight-month period (see Figure 1.1) from its kick-off in november 2018 to its completion in June 2019. initial engagement efforts began in december 2018 and lasted until February 2019. after the preparation of the existing conditions report and the development of draft plan and recommendations, a second round of engagement took place from april 2019 to may 2019. the final draft of the Plan was completed and approved on June 17, 2019. Photo Credit: Jenny Olmanson Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 2-1 existing conditions CHAPTER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 2-2 Farmington in Context 2-4 Existing Travel Behavior and Characteristics 2-8 Relevant Plan Review 2-14 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network 2-16 Level of Traffic Stress Analysis 2-25 Community Engagement Phase 1 2-28 Community Engagement Phase 2 Farmington Minneapolis Saint Paul Afton Apple Valley Arden Hills Bayport Birchwood Village Blaine Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Burnsville Carver Chanhassen Chaska Circle Pines Coates Columbia Heights Coon Rapids Corcoran Cottage Grove Crystal Deephaven Dellwood Eagan Eden Prairie Edina Elko New Market Excelsior Falcon Heights Fridley Gem Lake Golden Valley Grant Greenwood Hampton Hastings Hilltop Hopkins Hugo Inver Grove Heights Lake Elmo Lakeland Lakeville Landfall Lauderdale Lexington Lilydale Lino Lakes Little Canada Long Lake Mahtomedi Maple Grove MaplewoodMedicine Lake Medina Mendota Mendota Heights Miesville Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Mounds View New Brighton New Hope New Prague New Trier Newport North Oaks North Saint Paul Oak Park Heights Oakdale Orono Osseo Pine Springs Plymouth Prior Lake Richfield Robbinsdale Rosemount Roseville Saint Anthony Saint Louis Park Saint Paul Park Savage Shakopee Shoreview Shorewood South Saint Paul Spring Lake Park Stillwater Sunfish Lake Tonka Bay Vadnais Heights Vermillion Wayzata West Saint Paul White Bear Lake Willernie Woodbury Woodland Figure 2.1 Farmington in the Regional Context 35E 35 94 694 494 35W 52 10169 36 55 3 42 64 50 31 Farmington in Context Development Context the development of Farmington occurred originally because of the railroad system. the original town site, today’s downtown area, was established at the intersection of two small rail lines - the minnesota central and the Hastings & dakota - that ultimately became part of the chicago, milwaukee and st. Paul railroad. the town’s business district grew up adjacent to the milwaukee road depot. until the 1990s, Farmington’s commerce and industry was focused upon agricultural production. an area of lakeville township was annexed into Farmington in 1971. this major annexation immediately created a large gap of undeveloped land between the original town of Farmington south of the Vermillion river and this new residential area to the north. 2-2 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n With Farmington’s location on the edge of the twin cities metro area (as seen in Figure 2.1), it experienced an unprecedented growth rate during the mid 1990s. new housing developments were primarily constructed in the city’s northern portion closer to lakeville than the original town of Farmington. these new developments consisted of typical suburban subdivisions of single-family homes laid out on curvilinear streets. this growth intensified the disconnection and development contrast between the northern and southern portions of the city. as a result, Farmington as a whole is often perceived to have two separate areas within the community, one north and one south. Because the original development of Farmington occurred due to the railroad system rather than the interstate Highway system, Farmington’s downtown and surrounding residential neighborhoods consist of small, walkable, human-scale blocks with sidewalks. immediately adjacent to the original location of Farmington is a newer residential development that duplicates the small-block roadway pattern. the curvilinear and disconnected street pattern of much of the newer development of the 1970s and afterward presents more difficulties for walking and biking because of the circuitous and indirect routes they create with gaps in the sidewalk and trail network. Existing Funding Sources the capital improvement projects in parks and trails have been funded over the years through two funding sources. the first funding source has been through funds received from residential, commercial and industrial development. these funds were received as cash in lieu of land through the park dedication process. the second source of funding has been through the city’s municipal liquor store profit transfers. the city implemented an annual pavement management program for trail maintenance in 2012. the pavement management program provides annual funding for crack sealing and fog sealing trails. the city is broken into five areas, which results in every trail in the city receiving maintenance work at least once every five years. While there is annual funding in place for pavement management of trails, there is currently inadequate funding for replacement of trail sections that have so badly deteriorated that crack sealing and fog sealing hold no benefit. this is due to parts of the trail system being initially constructed more than 30 years ago. as a result, if the city wishes to continue to have a usable, safe and connected trail system, then a long term funding plan and source should be explored to be implemented in order to provide the funds needed to replace the city’s existing trail infrastructure over time. in 2017, a trail wayfinding signage program was initiated. three different park and open space areas were identified that contained highly used trail loops. the wayfinding signage program was funded by the municipal Farmington liquor store operational profits. 2-3 existing conditions Table 2.1 Bike/Walk Mode Share Over Time ModE 2000 2010 2016 Bicycle 0.0%0.2%0.6% Walk 1.3%0.7%0.6% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Multiple Years 73 75 81 336 536 1,001 10,051 Walk Bicycle Other Public Transportation Work at Home Carpooled Drove Alone Figure 2.2 Means of Transportation to Work Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Existing Travel Behavior and Characteristics data available through the us census Bureau and the metropolitan council help paint a picture of how Farmington residents are currently getting around the city and to other destinations. analyzing data that signifies a greater potential for walking and biking, such as zero-car households or households in poverty, also helps Farmington understand how much demand may exist for better walking and biking facilities. Bike and walk Mode Share Because trips to work make up a large majority of daily transportation, analyzing how residents get to work provides a good snapshot of typical mode share in Farmington. mode share is the percentage of travellers using a particular type of transportation. Figure 2.2 highlights how Farmington residents get to work most days of the year. in most american cities, especially suburban cities, many residents drive to work alone. an estimated 83% of Farmington residents drive to work compared to 76% of all us citizens. approximately 75 people bike to work in Farmington and an estimated 73 people walk to work. non-motorized transportation accounts for 1.5% total in Farmington. of note, the us census does not account for partial trips so if a resident decides to bike to the nearest transit stop and take the bus to work, that trip will likely be counted as a transit trip if the transit portion of the trip is longer in length. one significant fact to note about travel is that every person, regardless of the main travel mode, is a pedestrian at one point in time whether it’s walking (or rolling) from their car to their work entrance, walking to the transit stop, or walking to a neighbors house to carpool to work. as seen in table 2.1, walking and biking as a means of getting to work has shifted over time in Farmington. generally, the amount of people biking to work has seen an upward trend since 2000. the percent of people in Farmington walking to work has declined since 2000. Both of these trends aren’t necessarily unique to Farmington; 2-4 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 1,290 10,863 Co m m u t e Le s s T h a n 1 0 Mi n u t e s Co m m u t e Mo r e T h a n 10 M i n u t e s Figure 2.3 Travel Time to Work Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates 12,801 1,278 5,003Workers Employed in City Workers Living and Employed in City Workers Living in City Figure 2.4 Employment Inflow and Outflow in Farmington Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics 2015 TRAVEl DISTANCE IN FARMINGTON Source: HKGi, Metropolitan Council Travel Behavior Inventory 2010 Household Interview Survey most us cities are seeing an increase in bike mode share as bicycling becomes a more attractive, acceptable, and safer mode of transportation. Travel Distance and Destination one of the largest determinants of how someone gets to their destination is the distance needed to travel. When a person is less than three miles from their destination, the chances of biking to their destination are more likely. similarly when a person is less than a half mile away from their destination, they are more likely to walk. even if individuals don’t choose to bike or walk to their destination, chances are that they are far more likely to consider it as an option if the distance needed to travel is short, especially when quality bike and walking facilities are present. according to a sample of individuals surveyed in the metropolitan council’s 2010 travel Behavior inventory, half of all trips in Farmington are six miles or less. nearly 30% of all trips made in Farmington are three miles or less and 7% are a half mile or less. While Farmington residents, workers, and visitors may not be choosing to bike or walk for all their trips, there is great potential as a large number of trips are short and could easily be made my foot, bike, or other mobility assisting device other than an automobile. as observed in Figure 2.3, for all modes of transportation, the majority of Farmington residents have a commute to work that is longer than 10 minutes. However, there are almost 1,300 2-5 existing conditions 177 898 2,636 3,995 More Workers than Vehicles Households with No Workers Less Workers than Vehicles Equal Number of Workers and Vehicles Figure 2.5 Vehicle Competitive Households in Farmington Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Table 2.2 Where Farmington Residents Work WoRk LoCATioN WoRkERS PERCENT Farmington, MN 1,278 10.0% minneapolis, mn 1,199 9.4% eagan, mn 1,064 8.3% lakeville, mn 965 7.5% st. Paul, mn 860 6.7% Burnsville, mn 859 6.7% Bloomington, mn 818 6.4% apple Valley, mn 780 6.1% rosemount, mn 322 2.5% edina, mn 274 2.1% all other locations 4,382 34.2% ToTAL 12,801 100.0% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin- Destination Employment Statistics 2015 Table 2.3 Where Farmington Workers Live HoME LoCATioN WoRkERS PERCENT Farmington, MN 1,278 25.5% lakeville, mn 591 11.8% apple Valley, mn 334 6.7% rosemount, mn 173 3.5% Burnsville, mn 170 3.4% northfield, mn 162 3.2% eagan, mn 150 3.0% minneapolis, mn 106 2.1% st. Paul, mn 92 1.8% Hastings, mn 67 1.3% all other locations 1,880 37.6% ToTAL 5,003 100.0% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin- Destination Employment Statistics 2015 Farmington residents that have less than a 10 minute commute. this is further demonstrated in Figure 2.4 which shows that of the 12,800 workers that live in Farmington, there are almost 1,300 that also work Farmington. it can be assumed that those with less than a 10 minute commute both live and work in Farmington. Because such a large gap exists between the amount of people who are currently walking and biking to work (148 people) and the amount of people who live and work in Farmington with less than a 10-minute commute (~1,300 people), there is great potential to increase the non-motorized transportation mode share with improved facilities. the availability and quality of biking and walking infrastructure in adjacent and nearby cities also matters because most Farmington residents work outside of the city and most Farmington workers live outside the city, as seen in table 2.2 and table 2.3. all of the census data presented here points to an opportunity to increase the mode share of biking and walking as a viable means of transportation for a significant number of people living and working in Farmington. Selected Household Characteristics 2-6 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n Table 2.4 Zero Vehicle Households HouSEHoLd TyPE #% number of Zero Vehicle Households 144 1.9% total Households 7,706 100.0% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Table 2.5 Poverty Status of Farmington Residents SuBjECT ToTAL PoPuLATioN BELoW PovERTy LEvEL % BELoW PovERTy LEvEL Population Below Poverty level 22,090 627 2.8% White 20,088 439 2.2% Black or african american 304 85 28.0% american indian 39 9 23.1% asian 708 7 1.0% Hispanic or latino 774 31 4.0% other 951 87 9.1% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates When a household has more workers than it has vehicles, it is classified as a vehicle competitive household. People within a vehicle competitive household are oftentimes faced with the decision of how they are going to get around because they do not have the option to drive for every trip. When faced with conflicting travel situations, some people decide to work alternative work schedules, while others shift to a different means of transportation such as carpooling, transit, walking, or biking. Figure 2.5 highlights the number of vehicle competitive households in Farmington. knowing this data provides a clue as to how many workers could potentially benefit from a more connected bicycle and pedestrian network. it also highlights the fact that, within the right circumstances, not every eligible driver within a household in Farmington needs to own a car, as they can supplement some trips by walking or biking to nearby destinations. the number of zero vehicle households, as presented in table 2.4, brings attention to the fact that there are 144 households in Farmington that do not own a vehicle. these residents must rely on other means of transportation. transit, non-motorized facilities, and mobility services all need to work in conjunction year-around to serve these households. according to aaa, it costs an average of $8,849 to operate the average car for 2018, or about $737 per month1. this amount factors in all costs of auto ownership over the life of the vehicle. For those living at or below the poverty level, vehicle ownership can be a significant cost burden. this cost burden can be eliminated or significantly lowered if a safe and convenient non-motorized transportation network exists. as seen in table 2.5, 627 (2.8%) Farmington residents live at or below poverty level. a disproportionate level of minority populations live below the poverty level in Farmington. 1 Your Driving Costs: How Much Are You Really Paying to Drive? [Brochure]. (2018 Edition) Heathrow, FL: AAA Association Communication 2-7 existing conditions 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA DRAFT DECEMBER 7, 2018 I Contents Relevant Plan Review a variety of plan documents were reviewed during the planning process. these plans and supporting planning/policy documents have been created over the last 10 years and provide a foundation to build the future bike and pedestrian network in Farmington. the following is an inventory of relevant findings from this plan review. 2040 City of Farmington Draft Comprehensive Plan (2018) the city of Farmington updated it’s city-wide comprehensive plan in 2018. this plain will serve as a strategic guide for future development and public infrastructure to ensure a safe, well- designed and economical environment for residential, commercial, industrial and public activities. the draft plan was submitted to the metropolitan council in december of 2018. the following 2040 draft comprehensive Plan chapters contain relevant background and guidance for the Bike + Ped Plan: Transportation »stated goal to “promote transportation alternatives ensuring that non-motorized, transit, and motorized travel needs are met in a balanced manner consistent with community values.” »current crash data shows that pedestrian crashes have been located within neighborhood streets or along more rural sections of roadways including akin road and Pilot knob road. Bicyclist crash data indicates facilities may be needed along csaH 50 and tH 3. »tH 3 will likely expand into a 4-lane divided roadway. »there is no scheduled or planned public transit service within Farmington. an extension of the red line Bus rapid transit (Brt) will result in a future station at cedar avenue and 215th street in lakeville (closest transit station to Farmington). »Future collector roadways in Farmington will have a multi-purpose trail on one side, and a sidewalk on the other. Future local streets are to have sidewalks on one side of the road, both sides if conditions allow. »the metropolitan council has defined the regional Bicycle transportation network (rBtn) in an effort to establish regional bike networks. Within the city of Farmington, three tier 2 rBtn corridors have been identified: along csaH 50 between the west city boundary and downtown, generally along a future alignment of cr 33 extension or north creek, and an east/northwest connection from Farmington into lakeville. Cover of 2040 Comprehensive Plan DRAFT December 7, 2018. Source: City of Farmington RBTN Network, as shown in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft. Tier 2 Corridors are shown in green. Source: City of Farmington 2-8 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n Existing and Proposed Park, Trail and Open Space Plan, per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft. Source: City of Farmington Sustainability »the city of Farmington is a member of minnesota greenstep cities, and has been awarded step 2 status, as of 2018. »there are at least (12) greenstep actions related to improving the bicycle and pedestrian network that, if implemented, would contribute towards reaching step 3 status for the city. Parks and Recreation »an updated existing and Proposed Park, trail and open space plan is included in this chapter »a recommendation includes development of a “Bike and Pedestrian Plan that can be used to identify where [trail] gaps currently occur along with ensuring that future new trails are connected to the existing trail network.” »the Five Year Parks and trail improvement Budget does not show any funding allocated for trail improvements, highlighting a need for a long-term funding strategy. 2-9 existing conditions 2030 Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2009) a detailed Parks and recreation master Plan was developed in coordination with the 2030 comprehensive Plan update in 2009. this plan has served to guide the last 10 years of parks, open space, and trail development in Farmington. »an existing and Proposed Park, trail, and open space Plan served as primary guidance for park and trail development from 2009-2018. »this plan indicated strong community and city support for expansion of the trail and sidewalk system »a trail classification system was created, which includes park trails, connector trails, bikeways, alternative use trails and greenways. this classification system does not appear to have been consistently employed over the last 10 years. »trail priorities that were identified in this plan include construction of ada compliant trails, loop trails of varying levels of difficulty, adding trail amenities (restrooms, benches, bike racks, drinking fountains) throughout the system, connecting future neighborhood trails to commercial and industrial areas, and developing a long-term financial plan for the development of parks, open spaces and trails. Safe Routes to School: Meadowview Elementary (2018) a number of safe routes to school plans were completed in 2018 for Farmington area Public schools, including meadowview elementary school. the purpose of this plan is to provide recommendations and strategies to make walking and biking to and around meadowview elementary school a safe, comfortable, and fun activity for all students and families. the plan is structured on the 6 e’s (engineering, evaluation, encouragement, education, enforcement) and was created through the mndot srts Planning assistance program. »Per district policy, students must live at least 1 mile from their school to qualify for district-provided (bus) transportation »a survey of meadowview students in spring 2018 showed that over 50% of students take the bus to and from school, 36% are dropped off by family vehicle, 2% carpool, 6% walk, 2% walk, and 4% use other means of transportation. »according to a parent survey, distance, weather, speed of traffic and safety of intersections were the top reasons for not allowing their kids to walk or bike to school. »infrastructure recommendations include a focus on safety improvements along 195th street (csaH 64) and creating another hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg hg ") !( !( !( ’ ’ ") NORTH CREEK PARK AUTUMNGLENOPENSPACE RAMBLINGRIVER PARK PR A I R I E V I E W W A T E R W A Y G R E E N W A Y VERMILLIONGROVEPARK FARMINGTONPRESERVEPARK DAISYKNOLLPARK MEADOWVIEWPARK LAKE JULIAPARK MIDDLECREEKPARK FA I RHILL G R EE NWAY NORTHCREEKGREENWAY PINEKNOLLPARK PRAIRIEVIEWPARK FAIRHILLSPARK HILL DEEPARK EVERGREENKNOLL PARK HILLVIEWPARK TAMARACKPARK DAKOTA COUNTYESTATES PARK WESTVIEWPARK SCHMITZMAKIARENA TROYHILLPARK SILVERSPRINGSPARK (FutureMiddleCreekGreenway) (F u t u r e M i d d le C r e e k G r e e n w a y ) ( F u t u r e N o rt h C r e e k G r e e n w a y ) (Future South Creek Greenway) (F u t u r e V e r m illi o n Ri v e r G r e e n w a y ) (FutureMiddleCreekGreenway) NEW HIGH SCHOOL SITE MEADOWVIEWELEMENTARYSCHOOL FARMINGTONHIGH SCHOOL FARMINGTONMIDDLE SCHOOLEAST & WEST AKIN ROADELEMENTARYSCHOOL FARMINGTONELEMENTARYSCHOOL (FutureRegionalTrail) (FutureRegionalTrail) 3 64 64 50 74 31 50 Existing and Proposed Park, Trail and Open Space Plan Map, 2008 Prepared for the Farmington Parks Departmentby the Dakota County Office of GIS.0 21 Miles µ City of Farmington Legend Existing Trails Proposed Trails Schools City Parks Private Parks Greenways Proposed Parks hg Community hg Neighborhood Map dated January, 2008. Project #12001 MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FARMINGTON AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Safe Routes to School A plan to make walking and biking to school a safe, fun activity JUNE 2018 Existing and Proposed Park, Trail and Open Space Plan, per 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Source: City of Farmington (Above) Cover of Safe Routes to School Plan for Meadowview Elementary School. Source: Farmington Area Public Schools 2-10 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE STUDY | DRAFT DECEMBER, 2018 Introduction | 1-12 Figure 1-4: Pedestrian and Bicycle Demand Analysis Pedestrian and Bicycle Demand Analysis, per Dakota County Pedestrian and Bicycle Study. Source: Dakota County trail connection to the charleswood neighborhood to the east of the school. Dakota County Pedestrian and Bike Study (2018) dakota county completed a Pedestrian and Bicycle study in 2018 as part of the dakota county 2040 transportation Plan update (to be completed in 2019). the purpose of the Pedestrian and Bicycle study is to create a unified vision for county-wide walking and bicycling networks and to identify policies, strategies and tools to encourage active living and improve community health. »the study shows that within Farmington, there is moderate demand for biking and walking in the downtown area, as well as residential areas north of Highway 64 (195th street) near Pilot knob road and surrounding Farmington High school. »a level of traffic stress analysis was performed, identifying comfort levels for existing county trails. »the Planned county Bicycle network shows Pilot knob road and Highway 64 included as planned and existing shared use (county) trails through Farmington City of Farmington Development Code development standards per city of Farmington development code were reviewed for specific items pertaining to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. the following are key findings from this review: »sidewalks shall be no less than 5’ in width, and provided where city council deems it appropriate. »trails shown in the comprehensive Plan shall be no less than 8’ in width. »all trails shall have at least 20’ wide access where the trail connects to a street or sidewalks. »developers are responsible for construction of trails as shown in the comprehensive Plan. »trails shall connect with existing trails or sidewalks. »the Planning division, Parks and recreation department, and engineering department shall determine feasibility for trail construction near wetland or ponds. »specific design standards exist for the spruce street commercial, mixed use and Business/Flex Zoning districts. these standards include provisions for sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and pedestrian amenities. notably, bike parking shall be installed at 10% of the total number of automobile spaces within developments in these districts. 2-11 existing conditions 4t h 6t h 7t h 3r d 1s t 5t h 8t h 2n d Spruce Ak i n 208th Main Maple Hickory Willow 207th Oak Di v i s i o n Pine 206th Linden Da l l a s 9th Walnut Co l o r a d o Beech Locust 213th Ho n e y s u c k l e We s t v i e w Westdel 209th De v o n s h i r e Ash We s t w o o d We s t g a i l Hi g h l a n d Locust Maple Pine Oak Beech 8t h 7t h Hickory Spruce Pine Hickory Hickory 5t h 8t h Walnut Beech ")74 ")50 ")31 ")66 ")31 ¬«3 Proposed Sidewalk + Mid-block Pedestrian Crossing Proposed Trail Proposed Regional Trail Connection Existing Trail Existing Sidewalk Railroad Crossing Signaled Intersection Project Boundary Pedestrian & bike circulation plan shows key opportunities for improving downtown’s walking and biking connections. Figure 14: Bike and Pedestrian Network Plan 27 Farmington Downtown Redevelopment Plan Highway 3 Corridor Plan (2019) concurrent with the development of the Bike + Ped Plan, the city of Farmington is developed a Highway 3 corridor Plan, which was adopted by the city council on June 3rd, 2019. Highway 3 (tH 3) is a sate highway with existing land use incompatibilities including a mix of residential homes and businesses. several smaller redevelopment efforts and projects involving new construction or redevelopment of existing buildings have occurred in recent years. the purpose of the plan is to identify unique re-development opportunities with the understanding that Highway 3 will likely expand into a divided 4-lane highway. »the project area consists of an approximately 2-mile stretch of tH 3 north of 225th street and south of Vermillion river trail (cr 66) »community input gathered during this planning process includes a number of issues raised related to biking and walking in Farmington, including a concern for high vehicular speeds. »today, frontage roads along the highway serve as informal ways for bicyclists and pedestrians to travel along the corridor, in addition to portions of paved wide shoulders along tH 3. »in general, there is a need for improved pedestrian crossings at major intersections, as well as dedicated pedestrian facilities along the corridor Downtown Redevelopment Plan (2016) a downtown redevelopment Plan was created and adopted in 2016. this plan serves as a guide for the city council, economic development authority, and other advisory commissions to identify opportunities in the downtown area for redevelopment. the study area encompasses 20 blocks between 1st street, Walnut street, 5th street and the Vermillion river. »Within the study area, an inventory of existing sidewalks and trails show a lack of trails within the downtown area, although most streets are served by sidewalks on both sides of the street »downtown core redevelopment initiatives include improving the pedestrian environment, adding bike trail facilities to the river and regional trail connections, completing a downtown trail network, and improving Highway 50 crossings for pedestrians and bicyclists. »the Bike and Pedestrian network Plan in this study shows a proposed trail connection along the railroad to Pine street, connecting to rambling river Park, as well as sidewalk connections along 2nd street between Highway 50 and Walnut street. Example of community input comment gathered through a Social Pinpoint web survey for the Highway 3 Corridor Plan. Source: City of Farmington Bike and Pedestrian Network Plan, per the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Source: City of Farmington 2-12 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 36 Chapter 3 the Plan Figure 36. North Creek Greenway segment 3 concept plan Segment 3: lakeville and Farmington North (3.5 miles) From County Road 46 / 160th Street the greenway will connect through the current mining/future development area to the Brandtjen Farm neighborhood and East Lake Park, a City of Lakeville community park. From East Lake Park to 195th Street, the greenway will follow North Creek. In this segment, much of the trail already is constructed, with a few trail gaps. From Fairhill Park the greenway heads directly south, following North Creek about a mile. North Creek then veers east while the greenway continues south, crossing Middle Creek and following the west side of the Canadian Pacific Railway to the Vermillion River. At the Vermillion River, the greenway follows the river in both directions: west to downtown Farmington and Rambling River Park and east to a community park in Empire Township. Water crossings For this segment of the greenway, three bridge crossings will be necessary, as shown on Figure 36. Bridges will be needed to cross the north branch of North Creek in an area to be developed in the future, the wetland near 189th Street in Farmington and Middle Creek north of downtown Farmington. Rambling River trailhead and downtown Farmington A trailhead is recommended at the ice arena on the southwest edge of Rambling River Park. Here there are opportunities to share existing parking and restroom facilities and add picnicking, interpretation and wayfinding. North Creek Greenway Segment Concept Plan, per North Creek Greenway Master Plan. Source: Dakota County North Creek Greenway Master Plan 2011 37 Connections to destinations in downtown Farmington are also recommended. A trail link to a neighborhood gateway at Farmington’s Depot Art Park is suggested. The trail connection to this gateway is shown in Figure 37. Natural resources and water quality east lake f Continue buckthorn management. f Perform prescribed burns on restored prairies on upland mine areas and oak woodlands. f Address fall algae blooms in the lake. north Creek corridor and preserve f Restore prairie on uplands and oak woodlands on the berms to the east. f Manage invasive vegetation along North Creek and adjacent areas. Vermillion river and rambling river Park f Widen and maintain stream buffers with native plants to improve floodplain wetlands and forest quality. Rambling River Park 3 Dodge Middle School School ballfields Riverview Elementary School 200 Feet ELM STREET AK I N R O A D CH I P P E N D A L E A V E W Proposed bridge over Vermillion River Proposed North Creek Greenway regional trail Connection to downtown Farmington Schmitz Maki Arena To Lakeville Depot Way Arts Park P P Figure 37. Downtown Farmington and rambling river Park Trail connection Wayfinding Proposed grade separated crossing Existing grade separated crossing Existing regional trail Existing local trail Proposed regional trail Proposed local trail Greenway corridor Gateway landmark Ver m i l l ion Riv e r 50 Downtown Farmington and Rambling River Park Concept Plan, per North Creek Greenway Master Plan. Source: Dakota County North Creek Greenway Master Plan north creek is a tributary of the Vermillion river that connects eagan, apple Valley, lakeville, Farmington and empire township. the 14-mile north creek greenway will connect important regional destinations, such as lebanon Hills regional Park, the minnesota Zoo, downtown Farmington, the Vermillion river and Whitetail Woods regional Park. today, portions of the regional trail are completed within Farmington: »section through north creek Park, Jim Bell Park and Preserve Park crossing 195th street with a tunnel and traveling further south along north creek. »section along rambling river Park from schmitz-maki arena to where the railroad corridor crosses the Vermillion river, following the railroad north to 205th street 2-13 existing conditions Table 2.6 Existing Facility Length FACiLiTy TyPE LENGTH (FT) LENGTH (Mi) WALkiNG oNLy sidewalk 163,502 31.0 natural surface 5,301 1.0 Boardwalk 1,489 0.3 MuLTi-uSE Bridge 1,258 0.2 Paved trail 246,888 46.8 ToTAL MuLTi-uSE 248,146 47.0 ToTAL BikE ANd WALk FACiLiTiES 418,438 79.2 Source: HKGi, City of Farmington * Only includes paved trail and bridge facility types Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network the city currently owns and maintains 47 miles of paved asphalt trails, one mile of natural surface trails and about a half mile of boardwalks and bridges. consistently community surveys show trails are one of the most used and most popular park/recreational facilities in cities. Farmington residents overwhelmingly appreciate and use the existing trail network, according to information gathered through community engagement for this plan. there are 31 miles of concrete sidewalks in Farmington, most of which are located in the older neighborhoods of Farmington. all of these facilities are illustrated in Figure 2.6 and quantified in table 2.6. a majority of the paved trail system was constructed during the peak of development in the city, which that occurred from the 1980s through 2006. as a result, the city did not provide capital funding to build most of the current trail system. the city has made an effort to fund the construction of paved trails where gaps have occurred. since the city began constructing trails in the 1980s, it has placed a requirement that all trails be accessible according the requirements outlined in the americans with disabilities act (ada). the ada requires trails to be relatively flat with a slope of 5% or less. in situations where ada requirements could not be met, the city has provided a secondary or alternative trail route that accommodates people of all ages and abilities to use the trail system. a number of segments of the north creek greenway, a regional trail, have been constructed throughout Farmington. a segment of the grail exists along the north side of Farmington, running through north creek Park, Jim Bell Park and Preserve, crossing csaH 64 via a tunnel underpass and continuing about a quarter mile south. another segment exists through rambling river Park, alongside the Vermillion river. another segment has been constructed along the Vermillion river in empire township, east of Farmington city limits. 2-14 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n EUREKA TWP. LAKEVILLE EMPIRE TWP. CASTLE ROCK TWP. NORTH C R E E K G R E EN W AY V E R M I L L I ON R I V E R G R E ENW AY ¬«66 ¬«74 ¬«64 ¬«31 ¬«50 ¬«64 11TH ST M E A D O W LARK W AY 213TH ST W FLAGSTAFF AVE 19 3 RD STW EATON AVE U P PER 182N DST W 180TH ST W 187TH S T W 190TH ST W WALNUT ST A K I N R D PINE ST SPRUCE ST WILLOW ST 6TH ST 224TH ST W E A S T V I E W A VE FAIRVIEW LN 13TH ST 206TH S T W EGRET WAY 2ND ST E U CLIDPAT H 200THSTW WILL O W TRL D O V E R D R 9TH ST ENGLISH A V E EVENSONG AVE HERITAGE WAY 199TH STW 198TH ST W D E E R B R O O K E PATH E V E R E S T P A T H DIVISION ST UPPER 183RD ST W MAPLE ST EVERHIL L A V E 203RDS T W 185TH ST W EC H O DR D U N B U R Y A V E E M B E R S A V E E U C L I D S T OAK ST 12TH ST MAIN ST CA M D EN P A T H D U L U T H S T 183RD S T W E MERALD T RL EN GLEWOO D W A Y E R I C KSON PAT H LARCH ST LOCUST ST 14TH ST 4TH ST 1ST ST 3RD ST 5TH ST ESCA L A D E W AY EXPL O RERWAY EV ENING STARWAY D U N B A R AV E 189TH ST W DIA MOND PATH 208TH ST W E M PIRE TRL KNUTSEN DR CYPR E S S D R EVE N S TONDR EXCALIB UR T RL DYLAN DR DU P ONT WAY 210TH ST W 220TH ST W ")3 ")50 ")3 Farm ington City Boundary Parks Public School Facilities Dakota County Greenways Existing Alternate Farmington Bike/Walk Facilities Boardwalk Bridge Sidewalks (Pedestrian Only) Natural Surface Paved Trail F00.5 10.25 Miles Figure 2.6 Existing Facilities by Type 2-15 existing conditions Examples of Facilities and Crossings Designed for All Users level of Traffic Stress Analysis Comfort levels of Biking not all people have the same level of comfort when it comes to bicycling. originally developed by roger geller at the city of Portland (or) the “Four types of Bicyclists” (see Figure 2.7) are meant to guide efforts in assessing what certain segments of a population require or want in a bikeway facility. geller suggested that most people can be categorized into the following four groups: 1. Strong and Fearless: People willing to bicycle with limited or no bicycle-specific infrastructure 2. Enthusiastic and Confident: People willing to bicycle if some bicycle-specific infrastructure is in place 3. Interested but Concerned: People willing to bicycle if high- quality bicycle infrastructure is in place 4. Not able or Interested: People unwilling to bicycle even if high- quality bicycle infrastructure is in place these typologies help us identify which segments of the population need lower stress facilities to try bicycling or to bicycle more often. most cities find that as they build safer and more comfortable bicycle facilities, the number of people bicycling increases. this is due to the fact that one of the largest groups of bicyclists identify as “interested but concerned” with biking. When bicycle facilities are built to the needs of the “Interested but Concerned”, the results of investment yield the highest number of users. additionally, when more people start bicycling because of a more comfortable network, biking becomes safer due, to the fact that motorists are more aware of the bicyclists presence. Level of Traffic Stress riding a bicycle should not require bravery, courage, or expensive specialized gear. Yet, this is often the perception among cyclists and non-cyclists alike. For a bicycling network to attract the widest 2-16 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n Figure 2.7 Four Types of Bicyclists in Farmington STRONG AND FEARlESS ENTHUSIASTIC AND CONFIDENT INTERESTED BUT CONCERNED NOT ABlE OR NOT INTERESTED »Advanced, confident rider who is comfortable riding in most traffic situations »Tend to have high performance gear, clothing »Take the shortest routes and seek challenges »Prefer to ride separated from pedestrians due to higher speeds »Comfortable sharing the road with vehicular traffic but prefer bicycle lanes, multi-use trails »May choose to bike for health, environmental, transportation or recreation »May or may not have high performance gear, clothing »People who have no current interest in biking or physically unable to ride a bicycle »Often cite far distances, weather, costs as reason for not biking »Improvements in local facilities and networks, encouragement and education could help make riding (or walking/ non-motorized travel) a viable opportunity »Prefer to take off-street paths or low-volume residential streets »Safety is a big concern for these riders »Don’t generally self-identify as ‘bicyclists’ »Largest potential for increases in ridership »Improvements in facilities and networks would make riding a viable, more comfortable option 10%34%9%47% FOUR TyPES OF CyClISTS IN FARMINGTON: Farmington residents were presented with the four types of bicyclists concept as a part of the community survey for the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian plan. Survey participants were then asked to categorize themselves based on what type of cyclist group they thought they belonged in. Those results are displayed as percentages in Figure 2.7. Those that classify themselves as “Interested but Concerned” make up the largest cohort. This trend is typical among most cities in the US and indicates that as more safe and comfortable bicycle and trail facilities are built Farmington, the more people will begin to try bicycling or bicycle more often. 2-17 existing conditions EUREKA TWP. LAKEVILLE EMPIRE TWP. CASTLE ROCK TWP. ¬«66 ¬«74 ¬«64 ¬«31 ¬«50 ¬«64 11TH ST M E A D O W LARK W AY 213TH ST W FLAGSTAFF AVE 1 93 RD STW EATON AVE U PPER 182N DST W 180TH ST W 187TH S T W 190TH ST W WALNUT ST A K I N R D PINE ST SPRUCE ST WILLOW ST 6TH ST 224TH ST W E A S T V I E W A VE FAIRVIEW LN 13TH ST 206TH S T W EGRET WAY 2ND ST E U CLIDPAT H 200THSTW WILL O W TRL D O V E R D R 9TH ST ENGLISH A V E EVENSONG AVE HERITAGE WAY 199TH STW 198TH ST W D E E R B R O O K E PATH E V E R E S T P A T H DIVISION ST UPPER 183RD ST W MAPLE ST EVERHIL L A V E 203RDS T W 185TH ST W EC H O DR D U N B U R Y A V E E M B E R S A V E E U C L I D S T OAK ST 12TH ST MAIN ST CA M D EN P A T H D U L U T H S T 183R D S T W E MERALD TRL EN GLEWOO D W A Y E R I CKSON PAT H LARCH ST LOCUST ST 14TH ST 4TH ST 1ST ST 3RD ST 5TH ST ESCA L A D E W AY EXPL O RERWAY E V ENING STARWAY D U N B A R AV E 189TH ST W DIAMOND PATH 208TH ST W E M PIRE TRL KNUTSEN DR CYPR E S S D R EVE N S TON DR EXCALIB UR T RL DYLAN DR DUP ONT WAY 210TH ST W 220TH ST W ")3 ")50 ")3 Farmington City Boundary Parks Public School Facilities Level of Traffic Stress 1 High Comfort 2 3 4 Low Comfort F00.5 10.25 Miles Figure 2.8 Level of Traffic Stress Analysis (All Levels of Comfort) 2-18 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n possible segment of the population, there should be an excellent network of ‘low stress’ routes. these routes provide separation, through distance and/or physical barriers, between bicyclists and vehicles and directly connect destinations. level of traffic stress (lts) is an objective, data-driven approach to evaluating bikeways by matching up roadway design, traffic volumes, and motor vehicle speeds to individual perceptions of bicyclist comfort and a willingness to travel out of ones’ way to maintain that level of comfort. levels of traffic stress range from 1 to 4, and are defined as follows: »lts 1: -Strong separation (physical barrier such as curb and distance between bicyclist and vehicle) from all vehicles except low speed (<25 mph), low volume traffic (<2,000 vehicles/day), even at intersections -Simple crossings (low traffic volumes, short crossing distance, traffic control device present, low traffic speed) -Demands little concentrated attention from cyclists and is attractive enough for a relaxing bike ride -Suitable for children and those who are “Interested but Concerned” »lts 2: -Except in low speed / low volume traffic situations, cyclists have their own place to ride that keeps them from having to interact with traffic except at formal crossings Figure 2.9 Criteria for Determining Level of Traffic Stress DETERMINING THE lOw-STRESS BICyClE NETwORk: Criteria adapted from “Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity” by Mekuria, Furth, and Nixon published by the Mineta Transportation Institute were used to perform the level of traffic stress analysis for the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. For a deeper dive into the criteria developed in this report go to the link below. http://transweb.sjsu.edu/research/low-stress- bicycling-and-network-connectivity 2-19 existing conditions EUREKA TWP. LAKEVILLE EMPIRE TWP. CASTLE ROCK TWP. ¬«66 ¬«74 ¬«64 ¬«31 ¬«50 ¬«64 11TH ST M E A D O W LARK W AY 213TH ST W FLAGSTAFF AVE 1 93 RD STW EATON AVE U PPER 182N DST W 180TH ST W 187TH S T W 190TH ST W WALNUT ST A K I N R D PINE ST SPRUCE ST WILLOW ST 6TH ST 224TH ST W E A S T V I E W A VE FAIRVIEW LN 13TH ST 206TH S T W EG RET WAY 2ND ST E U CLIDPAT H 200THSTW WILL O W TRL D O V E R D R 9TH ST ENGLISH A V E EVENSONG AVE HERITAGE WA Y 199TH STW 198TH ST W D E E R B R O O K E PATH E V E R E S T P A T H DIVISION ST UPPER 183RD ST W MAPLE ST EVERHIL L A V E 203RDS T W 185TH ST W EC H O DR D U N B U R Y A V E E M B E R S A V E E U C L I D S T OAK ST 12TH ST MAIN ST CA M D EN P A T H D U L U T H S T 183RD S T W E MERALD TRL EN GLEWOO D W A Y E R I CKSON PAT H LARCH ST LOCUST ST 14TH ST 4TH ST 1ST ST 3RD ST 5TH ST ESCA L A D E W AY EXPL O RERWAY EVENING STARWAY D U N B A R AV E 189TH ST W DIA MOND PATH 208TH ST W E M PIRE TRL KNUTSEN DR CYPR E S S D R EVE N S TONDR EXCALIBUR T RL DYLAN DR DUP ONT WAY 210TH ST W 220TH ST W ")3 ")50 ")3 Farmington City Boundary Parks Public School Facilities High Comfor t Network Level of Traffic Stress 1 High Comfort 2-4 Other Levels of Comfort Served by High Comfort Trail Facility (1 Block Distance) Served by Other Level of Comfort Trail Facility (1 Block Distance) F00.5 10.25 Miles Figure 2.10 High Comfort Network Service Area 2-20 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n -Physical separation from higher speed and multi-lane traffic -Crossings that are easy for an adult to negotiate, children with help -Demands more attention than might be expected from children -A level of traffic stress that most adults can tolerate, particularly those who are “Interested but Concerned” »lts 3: -Involves interaction with moderate speed or multi-lane traffic, or close proximity to higher speed traffic -A level of traffic stress acceptable to those classified as “Enthusiastic and Confident” but still prefer having their own dedicated space »lts 4: -Involves interaction with higher speed traffic or close proximity to high speed traffic. -A level of stress acceptable only to those who identify as “Strong and Fearless” table 2.7 breaks down Farmington’s existing bicycle network into the four levels of traffic stress. of the 49.5 miles of bicycle and pedestrian network in Farmington, 68% is classified as a high comfort facility, made up of trails that are separated from high volume roadways. displayed in Figure 2.8, the high comfort bicycle network is spread throughout the city with the exception of the older areas of Farmington around downtown where bike facilities are absent. overall, approximately 21% of Farmington residents live within one block (325 ft) of a trail. as observed in Figure 2.10, when only accounting for the high comfort trail network, 17% of Farmington residents are within one block (325 ft) of a facility. a bicycle trip is only as comfortable as the most difficult intersection crossing. Because of this, many of the trail segments in Farmington that would have been classified as high comfort (lts 1) have been downgraded to lts 2, lts 3 or lts 4, primarily because they cross high volume and high speed roadways where there is little or no protection from automobile traffic. crossing arterial roadways such as Highway 3, Pilot knob road (county Highway 31), 195th street (county Highway 64), and 212th street (county Highway 50) is particularly dangerous and stressful for bicyclists and pedestrians; trails that cross these roadways and run along side of them are stressful as well. ACCESS TO THE TRAIl NETwORk 21% of Farmington Residents live within 1 block of a trail 17% of Farmington Residents live within 1 block of the high comfort trail network Source: HKGi, US Census Block Group Data, Met Council Generalized Land Use Data Table 2.7 Level of Traffic Stress Analysis LTS SCoRE LENGTH (Mi)% 1 - High comfort 33.7 68% 2 12.6 25% 3 0.3 1% 4 - low comfort 2.9 6% ToTAL 49.5 100% Source: HKGi 2-21 existing conditions EUREKA TWP. LAKEVILLE EMPIRE TWP. CASTLE ROCK TWP. ¬«66 ¬«74 ¬«64 ¬«31 ¬«50 ¬«64 11TH ST M E A D O W LARK W AY 213TH ST W FLAGSTA FF AVE 1 9 3 RD STW EATON AVE U PPER 182N DST W 180TH ST W 187TH S T W 190TH ST W WALNUT ST A K I N R D PINE ST SPRUCE ST WILLOW ST 6TH ST 224TH ST W E A S T V I E W A VE FAIRVIEW LN 13TH ST 206TH S T W EGRET WAY 2ND ST E U CLIDPAT H 200THSTW WILL O W TRL D O V E R D R 9TH ST ENGLISH A V E EVENSONG AVE HERITAGE WAY 199TH STW 198TH ST W D E E R B R O O K E PATH E V E R E S T P A T H DIVISION ST UPPER 183RD ST W MAPLE ST EVERHIL L A V E 203RDS T W 185TH ST W EC H O DR D U N B U R Y A V E E M B E R S A V E E U C L I D S T OAK ST 12TH ST MAIN ST CA M D EN P A T H D U L U T H S T 183RD S T W E MERALD TRL EN GLEWOO D W A Y E R I CKSON PAT H LARCH ST LOCUST ST 14TH ST 4TH ST 1ST ST 3RD ST 5TH ST ESCA L A D E W AY EXPLO RERWAY E VENING STARWAY D U N B A R AV E 189TH ST W DIAMOND PATH 208TH ST W E M PIRE TRL KNUTSEN DR CYPR E S S D R EVE N S TONDR EXCALIBUR T RL DYLAN DR DUP ONT WAY 210TH ST W 220TH ST W ")3 ")50 ")3 Farmington City Boundary Parks Public School Facilities High Comfort Network Level of Traffic Stress 1 High Comfort 2-4 Other Levels of Comfort F00.5 10.25 Miles High Comfort Islands* (Bicycle) *For illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual bicycle travelsheds. Figure 2.11 High Comfort Network Service Area Islands 2-22 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n While the lts analysis doesn’t directly measure level of comfort for pedestrians, bicyclists have more aspects in common with pedestrians than they do motor vehicles and there pedestrians and bicycle share many of the same planning needs. also, pedestrians may benefit from the level of stress analysis because most bike facilities in Farmington are multi-use facilities. High Comfort Islands taking into account high stress crossings, Farmington’s high comfort bicycle network becomes less of a network and more of a series of islands, isolated from other trail connections. Figure 2.11 shows seven distinct high comfort islands that exist within Farmington. many high quality loop trails exist for recreational bicycle riding within these islands, but moving throughout the city by bicycle becomes much more difficult and dangerous. a person living within the blue high comfort island will feel comfortable biking anywhere within the blue area, but will feel separated from the rest of the bicycling network even though some stressful crossing exist. the same is true for each of the other six islands. some high comfort islands are larger than others, signifying a more connected high comfort network. For example, the yellow high comfort island is the largest of all the islands. there is a high comfort crossing that exists underneath the 195th st. bridge at north creek. Because of flooding and snow cover, this area may be difficult to cross during spring and winter, separating the high comfort island into multiple pieces. grade separated crossings increase safety in areas like these, however, cost and site constraints limit viability in all cases. Figure 2.11 shows that most parks in Farmington are served by the trail network. However, there are some parks that aren’t connected to the full high comfort network. schools are generally connected to a trail network, with the exception of Farmington High school. However, only one school is connected to a high comfort network (levi P dodge middle school in the purple island). schools, in particular, should be targeted for connection to high comfort trail networks, in order to best allow children to walk or ride to school. some of the high comfort islands in Farmington exist adjacent to each others. For example, the blue and red islands exist on opposite sides of Pilot knob road and the orange island is adjacent to the blue island on the other side of 195th st. Future improved intersection or mid-block crossings could significantly combine these areas to create one large high comfort island. larger high comfort islands mean that people can safely and comfortably travel to more destinations in Farmington by bike. When executed correctly, safety improvements to bicycling infrastructure improves safety for walking as well, especially at intersections. While many of the trails in Farmington are classified as high comfort facilities, the roads they have to cross make them feel more stressful. 2-23 existing conditions Figure 2.12 Social Pinpoint Community Feedback 2-24 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n Community Engagement Phase 1 community engagement uses community voices to influence and shape the planning process. a robust community engagement process paves the way for community support for the final plan and makes implementation of plan elements easier. this section highlights the comments of community members as they participated in the variety of community engagement opportunities throughout the planning process. Social Pinpoint social Pinpoint is a map-based online engagement tool that allows community members to leave comments on specific areas of the city via a map. Participants are then able to interact with each other, by ‘liking’ or ‘disliking’ other comments, or replying directly into a comment thread. social Pinpoint was used during the first phase of community engagement to identify areas in the city where: »people currently or would like to bike and walk to, »gaps in the bikeway and/or sidewalk network exist, »speeding is a common issue, »people feel unsafe while trying to cross the road as a bicyclist or pedestrian, and »segments of existing trails or sidewalks that need to be replaced in total, social Pinpoint was open for comment for two months from december 2018 to February 2019. over this period of time, 389 unique users visited the website, 174 comments were left by 50 people, and an average time of 14.5 minutes spent on the site by visitors. locations of comments gathered from social Pinpoint are shown in Figure 2.12. the largest number of comments provided identified dangerous crossings. the majority of these comments were placed along the arterial roadways that run through Farmington, mainly Highway 3, Pilot knob road (county Highway 31), 195th street (county Highway 64), and 212th street (county Highway 50). Participants indicated that Farmington schools and downtown Farmington were two of the most desired destinations to walk and bike to. currently, there is a large bike network gap in and around downtown and many schools lack high comfort biking and walking facilities. Figure 2.13 Social Pinpoint Comments Gathered by Category SPEEDING TRAFFIC POOR TRAIL / SIDEWALK CONDITIONS BIKEWAY / SIDEWALK GAP BIKE / WALK DESTINATIONS DANGEROuS CROSSINGS 2-25 existing conditions Figure 2.14 How Often do Survey Respondents Bike and/or Walk for Recreational and Transportation Reasons 25% 52% 11% 12% 5% 14% 11% 71% Daily 1-3 Times a Week Once a Month Never Exercise/ Recreation Transportation Trips TRANSPORTATION TRIPS: Transportation trips can be classified as all trips whose primary purpose isn’t for exercise and recreation and are destination focused. Examples of transportation trips include trips to: »visit friends/family »shopping/run errands »restaurants, bars, and other entertainment »cultural, religious, or community events »work »school »make connections with transit Online Survey another way the community was engaged was through an online survey on survey monkey. the survey consisted of 11 questions and focused on individual preferences regarding biking and walking as well as what respondents thought of Farmington’s current and future bike/walk network. in total, the survey was open for collection for 2 months from december 2018 to February 2019 and there were 650 responses recorded. a summary of the survey is highlighted below. When survey respondents were asked how often they bike or walk for exercise/recreational purposes vs. transportation purposes (Figure 2.14) respondents indicated that they walk and bike for recreational and exercise purposes far more often than they do for transportation purposes. this may be, in part, due to the fact that the current sidewalk and trail system in Farmington lends itself to being more of a recreational based network due to the limited connectivity as discussed earlier in the level of traffic stress analysis. similar to the results received via the online mapping tool, survey respondents feel that the most important destinations that they would like to bike and walk to are parks, schools, and other residential areas. in the survey Farmington residents were presented with the four types of bicyclists concept, survey participants were then asked to categorize themselves based on what type of cyclist group they thought they belonged in. those results are presented earlier in the chapter in Figure 2.7 on page 2-17. survey participants were asked “What keeps you from walking or 2-26 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n TOP 5 BARRIERS TO BIkING AND wAlkING IN FARMINGTON 1 2 3 4 5 icy/snowy trails and sidewalks destinations are too Far apart Feel unsafe at road crossings Feel unsafe near traffic trails and sidewalks are incomplete Source: Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Survey, February 2019 Farmington Parks and Recreation Staff gather ideas from residents at the Farmington Community Expo, January 2019. Source: HKGi biking more in Farmington?” the top responses include: »my destinations are too far apart »there are no trails or sidewalks where i want to go »i don’t feel safe walking or biking near motorized traffic »i don’t feel safe crossing busy intersections »trails and sidewalks are too icy or snowy in the winter months »trails and sidewalks are lacking lighting With the exception of ‘my destinations are too far apart’ all of these identified barriers to walking and biking in Farmington can be addressed through improved network connections, intersection improvements, trail amenities and year-round maintenance. When asked how willing residents are to supporting a tax increase or referendum to fund future bicycle and pedestrian facilities in Farmington, the responses were varied. a weighted average showed that fewer than half of residents would support these measures. an open-ended question solicited general ideas from survey participants to improve conditions for biking and walking in Farmington. over two hundred ideas were shared, which shows the support and dedication of Farmington residents to improving the existing network and conditions for biking and walking. Bike + Ped Plan (BPP) Committee a Bike + Ped Plan committee was formed to serve an advisory role during the planning process. this group was formed by the Parks and recreation department, and a robust effort was made to include representatives from a variety of interest groups and perspectives on the committee. over the course of the plan process, the Bike + Ped Plan committee met three times. committee members were tasked with providing input and ideas during key points during the plan process, as well as assisting with outreach and community engagement efforts. Open House at the Community Expo a community open house was hosted in conjunction with the Farmington community expo in January of 2019. this was an opportunity for people to interact one-on-one with the plan consultant and Parks and recreation director, to share ideas, concerns and ask questions about the Bike + Ped Plan. Hundreds of people attended the community expo, and approximately 55 people stopped by the Bike + Ped Plan booth to share their ideas. Community Engagement Phase 2 2-27 existing conditions community engagement Phase 1 centered around gathering information from the community about their ideas, thoughts, and concerns on the future of walking and biking in Farmington, From this information, the draft network Plan and system recommendations were created, with guidance from city staff and the BPP committee, as well as through collaboration with dakota county and mndot. in april of 2019, community engagement Phase 2 was launched. this effort focused on sharing the draft plan with the community and interested stakeholders and gathering feedback on the draft network Plan and system recommendations. With this feedback, this draft document was revised and the implementation Plan was created. community engagement Phase 2 consisted of a public open house, an online survey, and a joint council Work session. Public Open House to officially launch the draft Plan, an public open house was held at Farmington city Hall on thursday, april 25th. this open house was advertised through social media, word-of-mouth through the BPP committee, and through city electronic communications. the open house featured presentation boards that outlined the plan process, results from the previous phase of community engagement, existing conditions, the draft network Plan and system recommendations. Participants were asked to provide specific feedback on the boards or through comment cards. Because attendance at the open house was low, the presentation boards were displayed in the lobby of city Hall for two weeks to allow more people the ability to view and comment. 2-28 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n Public Open House at City Hall as part of Community Engagement Phase 2 Online Survey an online survey was conducted in coordination with the open House and launch of the draft Plan. the survey was advertised alongside the public open house. community members were encouraged to visit a web link to view the draft Plan and system recommendations and weigh in on how much they support the goals and system recommendations. Participants were also asked to provide general comments and feedback about the plan. 148 people participated in the online survey, which was open for two weeks. in general, people expressed support for the ideas presented, and gave specific suggestions to improve wording and legibility of the plan. Joint Council work Session a joint council Work session was hosted at city Hall to present the draft Plan, system recommendations, and in-progress implementation Plan to the city council, Planning commission, and Parks and recreation advisory committee. members of the BPP committee were invited, as well as the general public. Participants were invited to engage in discussion and provide written feedback to the project team, which helped to inform final revisions of the draft Plan. 2-29 existing conditions Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n CHAPTER 3 Network Plan Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 3-2 System Goals 3-2 Draft Network Plan 3-4 Network Plan Elements 3-9 Intersection Treatments 3-11 System Recommendations 3-1 netWork Plan 3-2 System Goals the following goals provide direction for the overall bicycle and pedestrian network in Farmington. the goals are broad statements that are meant to be a guide for decision makers when vetting future city projects, policies, and programs. Goal 1 design, construct and maintain a comfortable, safe, and connected bicycle and pedestrian network suitable for those who are ‘interested but concerned’ and considerate of people of all ages and ability levels in Farmington. Goal 2 Building off of the existing system, improve conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists to connect to key community destinations such as parks, trails, schools, civic and commercial areas. Goal 3 make biking and walking a viable choice for transportation within Farmington, as well as for recreational purposes to encourage an active and healthy lifestyle. Draft Network Plan the draft network Plan builds off of the existing trail and sidewalk network, and identifies priority segments that will improve connections throughout Farmington. the Plan shows: »connector trails »neighborhood trails »sidewalks »greenways »on-street Bikeways »intersection treatments the following pages provide detailed descriptions and recommendations for the network plan elements and intersection treatments as shown on the draft network Plan. Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 3-3 netWork Plan FARMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVI P. DODGE MIDDLE SCHOOL RIVERVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FARMINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ROBERT BOECKMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL G L A D S T O N ETRL BRENN AN PATH FESTAL AVE FIELDCREST AVE MEA D O W L A R K W A Y 225TH ST W ASTERBILTLN 205TH ST W 193RDSTW DUSHANE PKWY 179TH ST W COUNTRY VIEW TRL ELK RIVERTRL EATON AVE 190TH ST W 170TH ST W 181ST STW UPPER 182N D ST W 173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR 180TH ST W 187TH ST W A KI N R D ABBEY LN EC H O LN CENTENNIAL DR CANTON CT DUNBURY K N L FLAGSTAFF AVE GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY ERIN CT 224TH ST W DREAMLN 223RD ST W GEMINI TRL BRUTUS DR DYNAMICDR CLAIRECT EA G L E WOOD TRL E A S T VIE W A V E EUROPA A V E FAIRVIEW LN ERIN WAY FALCON PATH EAGLE LN SUNNYSID E DR 13TH ST PRAIRIE VIE W TRL 206THSTW CASC A DEDR EGRET WAY CHESTERFIELD WAY FAIRMEADOW WAY 212THSTW FOXBOROLN PARKDR GERDINE PATH 202ND STW FORMOSA AVE EU C LID PA T H CAMROSE WAY 200TH ST W FAIRHAVEN AVE GANDERLN GAGE AVE EASTON AVE FORTUNETRL 204TH ST W W TRL ALLAS AVE EASTWOOD AVE DOVER DR ELGIN AVE EASTLAKE DR ENGLISH AVE DRAFTHO RSE BLVD EVENSONGAVE EUREKA AVE FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR CALGARYTRL GLANSHAW AVE F O L S O M P A T H SHAKESPEARE BLVD ROBINLN GATEWAYDR FRAZERPATH FLINT AVE D U LCIMERCT 198TH ST W 199THSTW D E E R B R O O K E P A T H 175TH ST W FIRELIGH T W A Y EVERESTPATH FRANCHISE WAY UPPER 183RD ST W HERITAGE WAY EVERHILLAVE EXC EPTIO N A L T R L FLUSHINGHILLSC T ENFIELD WAY FIVE OAKS DR FINESSE TRL FAIRHILLAVE 203RDSTW F R E E P O R TWAY 185TH ST W CLAREMONTDR EVENFALL AVE FAIRFAXAVE ELKWOOD AVE ECHO TER ECHO DR ELLICE LN DUNBURY AVE EVELETH CT EVELETH AVE EMBERS AVE GEORGE T O W N W AY CAR ME L T R L EUC LI D S T FIR ESI D E L N C E NTERFIE L D CT E X C H ANGETRL 188TH ST W B U T T E R N U T T R L GLA CIER W A Y CA M D EN P A TH E M B RY LN EN C H A N TED WAY D U L U T H S T 174TH ST W E X C E L C T 183RDST W 191STST W ESQUIRE WAY FRENCH AVE DE NALI CT B U R L IN G T O N PATH EV E R GR E E N T R L 178TH ST W FOREST ST EMERALD TRL CATTAIL LN CANBYCT F ORFARCT GL A S G O W A V E EN G L E W O O D W A Y FARADAY LN ENCINA PATH C E N T U R Y RD CHANDLE R A V E FOLIAGE AVE FIREBIRD CT 169TH ST W 197TH ST W EVEREST TRL DUL U T H CIR F URY CT EXCELSIOR LN ERICKSON P AT H 184TH ST W EVERT O N C T FULDA TRL ARBOR LN GALLECT EWING ST 198TH CT W EX O D U S A VE ELM ST 14TH ST FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOWWAY DOVER CT LOWERHERITAGEWAY CABRILLA WAY DUNCA N C IR CAMDENCT E S C A L A D E W AY ELLINGTON TRL EUREKACT C AN AR Y PAT H CASTLECT ROMEO DR JULIET DR MACBETH CIR DUNCAN CT FALCONAVE FIELDFARE WAY 201ST ST W F O RMOSACT CENTURYCT GOLDFIN C H DR C A R AV EL CT FONTINA PATH ENCORE CT CANTREL WAY GARRIS O N LN GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL CATTA IL CT B EAUMONTAVE ELY AVE E N RI G H T W A Y EDMONTON AVE EXETER AVE DENALI WAY ELMWOOD CI R 186TH ST W E N R IGHTCT 172ND ST W E S C O R T T R L EXP L ORER WAY CAMBRIA CT EVENINGSTARWAY EAGLEVIEW LN FROST CT D UN B A R AV E UPPER179TH ST W CALHOUN CT ETHELTON AVE 189TH ST W EUCLID AVE E MPEROR CT EXIRA AVE DIAMOND PATH EAVESWAY FIESTAAVE ENHANCE CT CAESAR ST ENGLISHCT ENIGMAWAY 203RD C T W FIRESTONEWAY 211TH ST W LANGFORDLN CAMBODIA AVE EMPIRETRL BISCAYNE AVE 220TH ST W F O N T A N A P A T H LOWER 183RD ST W DESMO N D CT KNUTSEN DR UPPER 204TH ST W C Y P R E S S DR EXLEY AVE FINCH PATH CLEO PATRAD R 177TH ST W EUCLID WAY F RUITWOOD PATH 210TH ST W E S S E N C E T R L GALERY DR FAIR ISLE PATH DULANEYDR EXPORT TRL FAIRMONT AVE EVENSTONDR EXCALIBUR TRL EVENINGTER 192ND ST W CANTON CIR GAGE WAY 176TH ST W TWINPONDCIR 194TH ST W ESTES PATH E X E C U TIVE PATH EXCLUSIVE PATH DYLAN DR NORTH CREEK LN CHEVELLE AVE CHILI AVE FIELDIN G WAY D A W S O N L N LOWER 182ND ST W G ET TY SB U R G WAY ELDORADO WAY D E V R IE PATH EASTOAKSDR COLORADO AVED YERSPASS MUNICIPALD R ESTATEAVE GARCIA WAY TAMAR ACK TRL E M B R Y A V E ELKRIDGE TRL 196TH ST W DUPONT WAY EQUINOXAVE FAIRGREEN AVE BEAUMONT WAY A NTHONYDR ESSEX AVE BERRING AVE 230TH ST W 220TH ST W H AMLET CIR EMPIRE TOWNSHIP LAKEVILLE EUREKA TOWNSHIP HILL DEE PARK DAISY KNOLL PARK HILLVIEW PARK LAKE JULIA PARK FARMINGTON PRESERVE PARK FAIR HILLS PARK VERMILLION GROVE PARK PINE KNOLL PARK RAMBLING RIVER PARK WESTVIEW PARK EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK DAKOTA COUNTY ESTATES PARK NORTH CREEK PARK FAIRHILL GREENWAY TROY HILL PARK MEADOWVIEW PARK MIDDLE CREEK PARK SCHMITZ MAKI ARENA PRAIRIE VIEW PARK MARIGOLD PARK TAMARACKPARK SILVER SPRINGS PARK NORTH CREEK GREENWAY JIM BELL PARK AND PRESERVE PRAIRIE WATERWAY GREENWAY PRAIRIE PINES PARK MAIN PINE WILLOW ST 205TH 209TH CAPRI ST 208TH ELM ST OAK ST SPRUCE WALNU 220TH CENTENNIAL DR HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST 12 T H S T HW Y 3 4T H S T 6T H S T 1S T S T DI V I S I O N AK I N R D PI L O T K N O B R D HW Y 3 1 TH 3 / C H I P P E N D A L E A V E W HIGHWAY 50 MAPLE CSAH 50 / 212TH BEECH ST V E R M I L LIO N RIVER V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A K I N R D E A S T V I E W 203RD 200TH E VERH I L L A V E FLAGSTAFF E N G L I S H AVE 19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W EN G L I S H A V E EN G L I S H A V E EM B E R S A V E E M B E R S A V E U P P E R 182ND ST D U N B U R Y A V E N O R T H C R E E K R E GI O N AL TR A I L DE E R B R O O K E P ATH199TH ST W L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y A B C D E F G H I J K CS A H 3 1 / P I L O T K N O B R D CR 64/ 195th ST W 180TH ST W 187TH ST W 185TH ST W C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W KEY EXISTING SIDEWALKS EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD TRAILS PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD TRAILS EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS EXISTING GREENWAYS PROPOSED GREENWAYS PROPOSED ON-STREET BIKEWAYS ACTIVITY AREA EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR TUNNEL) PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS WATER MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN 6/3/19 0 10.5 Miles DRAFT 5/13/19 FARMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVI P. DODGE MIDDLE SCHOOL RIVERVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FARMINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ROBERT BOECKMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GLADSTONETRL BRENN ANPATH FESTAL AVEFIELDCREST AVE MEADOWLARKWAY 225TH ST W ASTERBILTLN 205TH ST W 193RDSTW DUSHANE PKWY 179TH ST W COUNTRYVIEWTRL ELKRIVERTRL EATON AVE 190TH ST W 170TH ST W 181STSTW UPPER 182ND ST W 173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR 180TH ST W 187TH ST W A K IN R D ABBEY LN EC H O L N CENTENNIAL DR CANTON CT DUNBURYKNL FLAGSTAFF AVE GALLEONCIREVENTIDE WAY ERIN CT 224TH ST W DREAMLN 223RD ST W GEMINITRL BRUTUS DR DYNAMICDR CLAIRE CT EAGLEWOODTRL E A S T VI E W A V E EUROPA A V E FAIRVIEW LN ERIN WAY FALCON PATH EAGLE LN SUNNYS I D E DR 13TH ST PRAIRIEVIE W TRL 206THSTW CAS C A DEDR EGRET WAY CHESTERFIELD WAY FAIRMEADOW WAY 212THSTW FOXBOROLN PARKDR GERDINE PATH 202ND ST W FORMOSAAVE EUCLI D PATH CAMROSEWAY 200TH ST W FAIRHAVEN AVE GANDER LN GAGE AVE EASTON AVE FORTUNETRL 204TH ST W W TRL ALLAS AVE EASTWOOD AVE DOVER DR ELGIN AVE EASTLAKEDR ENGLISH AVE DRAFTHORSEBLVD EVENSONGAVE EUREKA AVE FIRESTONEPATHEAGLEVIEW DR CALGARYTRL GLANSHAW AVE FOLSOM PATH SHAKESPEARE BLVD ROBINLN GATEWAY DR FRAZERPATH FLINT AVE DULCIMERCT 198TH ST W 199THSTW D E E R B R O O K E P A T H 175TH ST W FIRELIGHTWAY EVERESTPATH FRANCHISE WAY UPPER 183RD ST W HERITAGE WAY EVERHILLAVE EX C EPTIO N A L T R L FLUSHINGHILLSCT ENFIELD WAYFIVEOAKSDR FINESSE TRL FAIRHILLAVE 203RDSTW FREEPORTWAY 185TH ST W CLAREMONTDR EVENFALL AVE FAIRFAXAVE ELKWOOD AVE ECHO TER ECHO DR ELLICE LN DUNBURY AVE EVELETH CT EVELETH AVE EMBERS AVE GEORGETOWNWAY CAR ME L T R L EUC L ID S T FIRESIDELN C E NTERFIE L D CT E X C H ANGETRL 188TH ST W B U T T E R N U T T R L GLACIERWAY CA M DEN PA T H EM BR Y LN EN C H A N TED WAY D U L U T H ST 174TH ST W EXCEL CT 183RDSTW 191STSTW ESQUIRE WAY FRENCH AVE DEN ALI CT B U R LI N G T O N PAT H EVER GR E E N T R L 178TH ST W FOREST ST EMERALD TRL CATTAIL LN CANBYCT FORFARCT GL A S G O W A V E E N G L E W O O D W A Y FARADAY LNENCINA PATH C E N T U R Y RD CHANDLER A V E FOLIAGE AVE FIREBIRD CT 169TH ST W 197TH ST W EVEREST TRL DULUTHCIR FU R Y CT EXCELSIOR LN ERICKSO N PA T H 184TH ST W EVERT O N C T FULDA TRL ARBOR LN GALLECT EWING ST 198TH CT W EX O D U S A V E ELM ST 14TH ST FIREBIRDPATHGLASGOWWAY DOVER CT LOWER HERITAGEWAY CABRILLA WAY DUNCA N C IR CAMDENCT E S C A L A D E W AY ELLINGTON TRL EUREKACT C A N A RY PAT H CASTLECT ROMEO DR JULIET DR MACBETH CIR DUNCAN CT FALCONAVE FIELDFARE WAY 201ST ST W FORMOSACT CENTURYCT GOLD F INCH DR C A R A V E L CT FONTINA PATH ENCORE CT CANTREL WAY GARR IS O N LN GANNON WAYFLORIN AVEFIRTREEPL CATTA IL CT BEAUMONTAVE ELY AVE E N R IG H T W A Y EDMONTON AVE EXETER AVE DENALI WAY ELMWOOD CI R 186TH ST W ENRIGHTCT 172ND ST W E S C O R T T R L EXP L ORER WAY CAMBRIA C T EVENING STARWAY EAGLEVIEW LN FROST CT D UN B A R A V E UPPER179THSTW CALHOUN CT ETHELTON AVE 189TH ST W EUCLID AVE E MPERORCT EXIRA AVE DIAMOND PATH EAVESWAY FIESTAAVE E NHANCE C T CAESAR ST ENGLISHCT ENIGMAWAY 203RDCTW FIRESTONEWAY 211TH ST W LANGFORDLN CAMBODIA AVE EMPIRETRL BISCAYNE AVE 220TH ST W FONTANA PATH LOWER 183RD ST W DESMONDCT KNUTSEN DR UPPER 204TH ST W C Y P R E S S D R EXLEY AVE FINCH PATH CLEOPATRAD R 177TH ST W EUCLIDWAY F R UITWOOD PATH 210TH ST W E S SE N C E T R L GALERY DR FAIR ISLE PATH DULANEYDR EXPORT TRL FAIRMONT AVE EVENSTONDR EXCALIBUR TRL EVENINGTER 192ND ST W CANTON CIR GAGE WAY176TH ST W TWIN PONDCIR 194TH ST W ESTES PATH E X E CU TIVE PATH EXCLUSIVE PATH DYLAN DR NORTH CREEK LN CHEVELLE AVE CHILI AVE FIELDINGWAY D A W S O N L N LOWER 182ND ST W GETTYSBURGWAY ELDORADO WAY D E V R I E P ATH EASTOAKS DR COLORADO AVED YERSPASS MUN ICIPALDR ESTATE AVE GARCIAWAY TAMARACKTRL E M B R Y A V E ELKRIDGE TRL 196TH ST W DUPONT WAY EQUINOXAVE FAIRGREEN AVE BEAUMONT WAY ANTHONYDR ESSEX AVE BERRING AVE 230TH ST W 220TH ST W HAMLET CIR EMPIRE TOWNSHIP LAKEVILLE EUREKA TOWNSHIP HILL DEE PARK DAISY KNOLL PARK HILLVIEW PARK LAKE JULIA PARK FARMINGTON PRESERVE PARK FAIR HILLS PARK VERMILLION GROVE PARK PINE KNOLL PARK RAMBLING RIVER PARK WESTVIEW PARK EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK DAKOTA COUNTY ESTATES PARK NORTH CREEK PARK FAIRHILL GREENWAY TROY HILL PARK MEADOWVIEW PARK MIDDLE CREEK PARK SCHMITZ MAKI ARENA PRAIRIE VIEW PARK MARIGOLD PARK TAMARACK PARK SILVER SPRINGS PARK NORTH CREEK GREENWAY JIM BELL PARK AND PRESERVE PRAIRIE WATERWAY GREENWAY PRAIRIE PINES PARK MAIN PINE WILLOW ST 205TH 209TH CAPRI ST 208TH ELM ST OAK ST SPRUCE WALNU 220TH CENTENNIAL DR HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST 12 T H S T HW Y 3 4T H S T 6T H S T 1S T S T DI V I S I O N AK I N R D PI L O T K N O B R D HW Y 3 1 TH 3 / C H I P P E N D A L E A V E W HIGHWAY 50 MAPLE CSAH 50 / 212TH BEECH ST V E R M I L LIO N RIVER V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A K I N R D E A S T V I E W 203RD 200TH EVERHILL AVE FLAGSTAFF E N G L I S H AVE 193RD 193RD ST W EN G L I S H A V E EN G L I S H A V E EM B E R S A V E E M B E R S A V E UPPER 182ND ST D U N B U R Y A V E N O R T H C R E E K R E GI O N AL TR A I L DE E R B R O O K E P ATH199TH ST W LAKE MARION GREENWAY A BC D E F G H I J K CS A H 3 1 / P I L O T K N O B R D CR 64/ 195th ST W 180TH ST W 187TH ST W 185TH ST W CR 64 / 195TH ST W KEY EXISTING SIDEWALKS EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD TRAILS PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD TRAILS EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS EXISTING GREENWAYS PROPOSED GREENWAYS PROPOSED ON-STREET BIKEWAYS ACTIVITY AREA EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR TUNNEL) PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS WATER MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN 6/3/19 0 10.5 Miles DRAFT 5/13/19 FARMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVI P. DODGE MIDDLE SCHOOL RIVERVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FARMINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ROBERT BOECKMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL G L A D S T O N ETRL BRENNANPATH FESTAL AVE FIELDCREST AVE MEA D O W L A R K W AY 225TH ST W ASTERBILTLN 205TH ST W 193RDSTW DUSHANE PKWY 179TH ST W COUNTRYVIEWTRL ELK RIVER TRL EATON AVE 190TH ST W 170TH ST W 181ST STW UPPER 182N D ST W 173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR 180TH ST W 187TH ST W A KI N R D ABBEY LN EC H O LN CENTENNIAL DR CANTON CT DUNBURY KN L FLAGSTAFF AVE GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY ERIN CT 224TH ST W DREAMLN 223RD ST W GEMINI TRL BRUTUS DR DYNAMIC DR CLAIRECT EA G L E WOOD TRL E A S T VI E W A V E EUROPA AV E FAIRVIEW LN ERIN WAY FALCON PATH EAGLE LN SUNNYSID E DR 13TH ST PRAIRIE VIEW TRL 206THSTW CASC A DEDR EGRET WAY CHESTERFIELD WAY FAIRMEADOW WAY 212THSTW FOXBOROLN PARKDR GERDINE PATH 202NDST W FORMOSA AVE EU CLID PATH CAMROSEWAY 200TH ST W FAIRHAVEN AVE GANDERLN GAGE AVE EASTON AVE FORTUNE TRL 204TH ST W W TRL ALLAS AVE EASTWOOD AVE DOVER DR ELGIN AVE EASTLAKE D R ENGLISH AVE DRAFTHO RSE BLVD EVENSONGAVE EUREKA AVE FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR CALGARYTRL GLANSHAW AVE F O L S O M P A T H SHAKESPEARE BLVD ROBINLN GATEWAYDR FRAZERPATH FLINT AVE D ULCIMERCT 198TH ST W 199THSTW D E E R B R O O K E P A T H 175TH ST W FIRELIGH T W A Y EVERESTPATH FRANCHISE WAY UPPER 183RD ST W HERITAGE WAY EVERHILLAVE EXCEPTIO N A L T R L FLUSHINGHILLSC T ENFIELD WAY FIVE OAKSDR FINESSE TRL FAIRHILLAVE 203RDSTW F R E E P O R TWAY 185TH ST W CLAREMONTDR EVENFALL AVE FAIRFAX AVE ELKWOOD AVE ECHO TER ECHO DR ELLICE LN DUNBURY AVE EVELETH CT EVELETH AVE EMBERS AVE GEORG E T O W N W AY CAR ME L T R L E UC LID S T FIRESIDELN C E NTERFIE L D CT E X C H ANGETRL 188TH ST W B U T T E R N U T T R L GLA CIE R W A Y CA M D E N P A TH E M B RY LN EN C H A N TED WAY D U L U T H S T 174TH ST W E X C E L C T 183RD ST W 191STSTW ESQUIRE WAY FRENCH AVE DE NALI CT B U R L IN G T O N PATH EV E R G R E EN T R L 178TH ST W FOREST ST EMERALD TRL CATTAIL LN CANBYCT F ORFARCT GL A S G O W AV E EN G LE W O O D W A Y FARADAY LN ENCINA PATH C E N T U R Y RD CHANDLER A V E FOLIAGE AVE FIREBIRD CT 169TH ST W 197TH ST W EVEREST TRL DUL U T H CIR FURY CT EXCELSIOR LN ERICKSON P AT H 184TH ST W EV ERT O N CT FULDA TRL ARBOR LN GALLECT EWING ST 198TH CT W E X O D U S A V E ELM ST 14TH ST FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOW WAY DOVER CT LOWER HERITAGE WAY CABRILLA WAY DUNCA N C IR CAMDENCT E S C A L A D E W AY ELLINGTON TRL EUREKACT CA NAR Y PAT H CASTLECT ROMEO DR JULIET DR MACBETH CIR DUNCAN CT FALCONAVE FIELDFARE WAY 201ST ST W F O RMOSA CT CENTURYCT GO L DFIN C H DR C A R AV EL CT FONTINA PATH ENCORE CT CANTREL WAY GARR I S O N LN GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL CATTA I L CT BEAUMONTAVE ELY AVE E N R IG H T W A Y EDMONTON AVE EXETER AVE DENALI WAY ELMWOOD CI R 186TH ST W E N R IGHTCT 172ND ST W E S C O R T T R L EXP L O RER WAY CAMBRIA CT EVENINGSTARWAY EAGLEVIEW LN FROST CT D U N B A R A V E UPPER 179TH ST W CALHOUN CT ETHELTON AVE 189TH ST W EUCLID AVE E MPEROR CT EXIRA AVE DIAMOND PATH EAVESWAY FIESTAAVE E NHANCE C T CAESAR ST ENGLISH C T ENIGMAWAY 203RD C T W FIRESTONEWAY 211TH ST W LANGFORDLN CAMBODIA AVE EMPIRE TRL BISCAYNE AVE 220TH ST W FONTANA PA T H LOWER 183RD ST W DESMON D CT KNUTSEN DR UPPER 204TH ST W C Y P R E S S D R EXLEY AVE FINCH PATH CLEO PATRA D R 177TH ST W EUCLID WAY F R UITWOOD PATH 210TH ST W E S S E N C E T R L GALERY DR FAIR ISLE PATH DULANEY DR EXPORT TRL FAIRMONT AVE EVENSTONDR EXCALIBUR TRL EVENINGTER 192ND ST W CANTON CIR GAGE WAY 176TH ST W TWINPONDCIR 194TH ST W ESTES PATH E X E C UTIVE PA TH EXCLUSIVE PATH DYLAN DR NORTH CREEK LN CHEVELLE AVE CHILI AVE FIELDING WAY D A W S O N L N LOWER 182ND ST W G ETTY S B U R G WAY ELDORADO WAY D E V R IE P ATH EASTOAKS DR COLORADO AVED Y ERSPASS MUNICIPALD R ESTATEAVE GARCIA WAY TAMARACK TRL E M B R Y AV E ELKRIDGE TRL 196TH ST W DUPONT WAY EQUINOXAVE FAIRGREEN AVE BEAUMONTWAY A NTHONYDR ESSEX AVE BERRING AVE 230TH ST W 220TH ST W H AMLET CIR EMPIRE TOWNSHIP LAKEVILLE EUREKA TOWNSHIP HILL DEE PARK DAISY KNOLL PARK HILLVIEW PARK LAKE JULIA PARK FARMINGTON PRESERVE PARK FAIR HILLS PARK VERMILLION GROVE PARK PINE KNOLL PARK RAMBLING RIVER PARK WESTVIEW PARK EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK DAKOTA COUNTY ESTATES PARK NORTH CREEK PARK FAIRHILL GREENWAY TROY HILL PARK MEADOWVIEW PARK MIDDLE CREEK PARK SCHMITZ MAKI ARENA PRAIRIE VIEW PARK MARIGOLD PARK TAMARACK PARK SILVER SPRINGS PARK NORTH CREEK GREENWAY JIM BELL PARK AND PRESERVE PRAIRIE WATERWAY GREENWAY PRAIRIE PINES PARK MAIN PINE WILLOW ST 205TH 209TH CAPRI ST 208TH ELM ST OAK ST SPRUCE WALNU 220TH CENTENNIAL DR HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST 12 T H S T HW Y 3 4T H S T 6T H S T 1S T S T DI V I S I O N AK I N R D PI L O T K N O B R D HW Y 3 1 TH 3 / C H I P P E N D A L E A V E W HIGHWAY 50 MAPLE CSAH 50 / 212TH BEECH ST V E R M I L LIO N RIVER V E R MI LLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A K I N R D E A S T V I E W 203RD 200TH EVERH I L L A V E FLAGSTAFF E N G L I S H AVE 19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W EN G L I S H A V E EN G L I S H A V E EM B E R S A V E E M B E R S A V E U P P E R 182ND ST D U N B U R Y A V E N O R T H C R E E K R E GI O N AL TR A I L DE E R B R O O K E P ATH199TH ST W L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y A B C D E F G H I J K CS A H 3 1 / P I L O T K N O B R D CR 64/ 195th ST W 180TH ST W 187TH ST W 185TH ST W C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W KEY EXISTING SIDEWALKS EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD TRAILS PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD TRAILS EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS EXISTING GREENWAYS PROPOSED GREENWAYS PROPOSED ON-STREET BIKEWAYS ACTIVITY AREA EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR TUNNEL) PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS WATER MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN 6/3/19 0 10.5 Miles DRAFT 5/13/19 FARMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVI P. DODGE MIDDLE SCHOOL RIVERVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FARMINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ROBERT BOECKMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL G L A D S T O N ETRL BRENNAN PATH FESTAL AVE FIELDCREST AVE ME A D O W L A R K W A Y 225TH ST W ASTERBILTLN 205TH ST W 193RDSTW DUSHANE PKWY 179TH ST W COUNTRYVIEW TRL ELK RIVER TRL EATON AVE 190TH ST W 170TH ST W 181ST STW UPPER 182ND ST W 173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR 180TH ST W 187TH ST W A KI N R D ABBEY LN EC H O LN CENTENNIAL DR CANTON CT DUNBURY KNL FLAGSTAFF AVE GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY ERIN CT 224TH ST W DREAMLN 223RD ST W GEMINI TRL BRUTUS DR DYNAMIC DR CLAIRECT E A G L E WOOD TRL E A S T VI E W A V E EUROPA AV E FAIRVIEW LN ERIN WAY FALCON PATH EAGLE LN SUNNYSID E DR 13TH ST PRAIRIEVIE W TRL 206THSTW CASC A DEDR EGRET WAY CHESTERFIELD WAY FAIRMEADOW WAY 212THSTW FOXBOROLN PARKDR GERDINE PATH 202ND ST W FORMOSAAVE EU CLID PATH CAMROSEWAY 200TH ST W FAIRHAVEN AVE GANDERLN GAGE AVE EASTON AVE FORTUNE TRL 204TH ST W W TRL ALLAS AVE EASTWOOD AVE DOVER DR ELGIN AVE EASTLAKE D R ENGLISH AVE DRAFTHO R SE BLVD EVENSONGAVE EUREKA AVE FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR CALGARYTRL GLANSHAW AVE F O L S O M P A T H SHAKESPEARE BLVD ROBINLN GATEWAYDR FRAZERPATH FLINT AVE D U LCIMERCT 198TH ST W 199THSTW D E E R B R O O K E P A T H 175TH ST W FIRELIGH T W A Y EVERESTPATH FRANCHISE WAY UPPER 183RD ST W HERITAGE WAY EVERHILLAVE EXCEPTIO N A L T R L FLUSHINGHILLSC T ENFIELD WAY FIVE OAKSDR FINESSE TRL FAIRHILLAVE 203RDSTW F R E E P O R TWAY 185TH ST W CLAREMONTDR EVENFALL AVE FAIRFAX AVE ELKWOOD AVE ECHO TER ECHO DR ELLICE LN DUNBURY AVE EVELETH CT EVELETH AVE EMBERS AVE GEORG ET O W N W AY CAR ME L T R L E UC LID S T FIRESIDELN C E NTERFIE L D CT E X C H ANGETRL 188TH ST W B U T T E R N U T T R L GLA CIE R W A Y CA M D E N P A TH E M B RY LN EN C H A N TED WAY D U L U T H S T 174TH ST W E X C E L C T 183RD ST W 191STSTW ESQUIRE WAY FRENCH AVE DE NALI CT B U R L I N G T O N PATH EV E R G R E EN T R L 178TH ST W FOREST ST EMERALD TRL CATTAIL LN CANBYCT F ORFARCT GL A S G O W AV E EN G LE W O O D W A Y FARADAY LN ENCINA PATH C E N T U R Y RD CHANDLER A V E FOLIAGE AVE FIREBIRD CT 169TH ST W 197TH ST W EVEREST TRL DUL UT H CIR FURY CT EXCELSIOR LN ERICKSON P AT H 184TH ST W EV ERT O N CT FULDA TRL ARBOR LN GALLECT EWING ST 198TH CT W E X O D U S A V E ELM ST 14TH ST FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOW WAY DOVER CT LOWER HERITAGEWAY CABRILLA WAY DUNCA N C IR CAMDENCT E S C A L A D E W AY ELLINGTON TRL EUREKACT CA NAR Y PAT H CASTLECT ROMEO DR JULIET DR MACBETH CIR DUNCAN CT FALCONAVE FIELDFARE WAY 201ST ST W F O R MOSA CT CENTURYCT GO L DFIN C H DR C A R AV EL CT FONTINA PATH ENCORE CT CANTREL WAY GARR I S O N LN GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL CATTA I L CT BEAUMONTAVE ELY AVE E N R IG H T W A Y EDMONTON AVE EXETER AVE DENALI WAY ELMWOOD CI R 186TH ST W E N R IGHTCT 172ND ST W E S C O R T T R L EXP L O RER WAY CAMBRIA CT EVENINGSTARWAY EAGLEVIEW LN FROST CT D U N B A R A V E UPPER 179TH ST W CALHOUN CT ETHELTON AVE 189TH ST W EUCLID AVE E MPEROR CT EXIRA AVE DIAMOND PATH EAVESWAY FIESTAAVE E NHANCE C T CAESAR ST ENGLISHC T ENIGMA WAY 203RD C T W FIRESTONEWAY 211TH ST W LANGFORDLN CAMBODIA AVE EMPIRE TRL BISCAYNE AVE 220TH ST W FONTANA PA T H LOWER 183RD ST W DESMO N D CT KNUTSEN DR UPPER 204TH ST W C Y P R E S S D R EXLEY AVE FINCH PATH CLEO PATRA D R 177TH ST W EUCLID WAY F R UITWOOD PATH 210TH ST W E S S E N C E T R L GALERY DR FAIR ISLE PATH DULANEY DR EXPORT TRL FAIRMONT AVE EVENSTONDR EXCALIBUR TRL EVENINGTER 192ND ST W CANTON CIR GAGE WAY 176TH ST W TWIN PONDCIR 194TH ST W ESTES PATH E X E C UTIVE PA TH EXCLUSIVE PATH DYLAN DR NORTH CREEK LN CHEVELLE AVE CHILI AVE FIELDING WAY D A W S O N L N LOWER 182ND ST W G ET TY SB U R G W AY ELDORADO WAY D E V R IE P ATH EASTOAKS DR COLORADO AVED Y ERSPASS MUNICIPALD R ESTATEAVE GARCIA WAY TAMARACK TRL E M B R Y AV E ELKRIDGE TRL 196TH ST W DUPONT WAY EQUINOX AVE FAIRGREEN AVE BEAUMONTWAY ANTHONYDR ESSEX AVE BERRING AVE 230TH ST W 220TH ST W H AMLET CIR EMPIRE TOWNSHIP LAKEVILLE EUREKA TOWNSHIP HILL DEE PARK DAISY KNOLL PARK HILLVIEW PARK LAKE JULIA PARK FARMINGTON PRESERVE PARK FAIR HILLS PARK VERMILLION GROVE PARK PINE KNOLL PARK RAMBLING RIVER PARK WESTVIEW PARK EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK DAKOTA COUNTY ESTATES PARK NORTH CREEK PARK FAIRHILL GREENWAY TROY HILL PARK MEADOWVIEW PARK MIDDLE CREEK PARK SCHMITZ MAKI ARENA PRAIRIE VIEW PARK MARIGOLD PARK TAMARACK PARK SILVER SPRINGS PARK NORTH CREEK GREENWAY JIM BELL PARK AND PRESERVE PRAIRIE WATERWAY GREENWAY PRAIRIE PINES PARK MAIN PINE WILLOW ST 205TH 209TH CAPRI ST 208TH ELM ST OAK ST SPRUCE WALNU 220TH CENTENNIAL DR HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST 12 T H S T HW Y 3 4T H S T 6T H S T 1S T S T DI V I S I O N AK I N R D PI L O T K N O B R D HW Y 3 1 TH 3 / C H I P P E N D A L E A V E W HIGHWAY 50 MAPLE CSAH 50 / 212TH BEECH ST V E R M I L LIO N RIVER V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A K I N R D E A S T V I E W 203RD 200TH EVERH I L L A V E FLAGSTAFF E N G L I S H AVE 19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W EN G L I S H A V E EN G L I S H A V E EM B E R S A V E E M B E R S A V E U P P E R 182ND ST D U N B U R Y A V E N O R T H C R E E K R E GI O N AL TR A I L DE E R B R O O K E P ATH199TH ST W L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y A B C D E F G H I J K CS A H 3 1 / P I L O T K N O B R D CR 64/ 195th ST W 180TH ST W 187TH ST W 185TH ST W C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W KEY EXISTING SIDEWALKS EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD TRAILS PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD TRAILS EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS EXISTING GREENWAYS PROPOSED GREENWAYS PROPOSED ON-STREET BIKEWAYS ACTIVITY AREA EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR TUNNEL) PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS WATER MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN 6/3/19 0 10.5 Miles DRAFT 5/13/19 FARMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVI P. DODGE MIDDLE SCHOOL RIVERVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FARMINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ROBERT BOECKMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GLADSTONETRL BRENNAN PATH FESTAL AVE FIELDCREST AVE M E A D O W L A R K W A Y 225TH ST W ASTERBILTL N 205TH ST W 193RDSTW DUSHANE PKWY 179TH ST W C OUNTRY VIEW TRL ELK RIVER TRL EATON AVE 190TH ST W 170TH ST W 181STSTW UPPER 182N D ST W 173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR 180TH ST W 187TH ST W A KI N R D ABBEY LN EC H O LN CENTENNIAL DR CANTON CT DUNBURY K N L FLAGSTAFF AVE GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY ERIN CT 224TH ST W DREAMLN 223RD ST W GEMINI TRL BRUTUS DR DYNAMICDR CLAIRECT E A GL E WOOD TRL E A S T VI E W A V E EUROPA AV E FAIRVIEW LN ERIN WAY FALCON PATH EAGLE LN SUNNYSID E DR 13TH ST PRAIRIE VIE W TRL 206THSTW CASC A DEDR EGRET WAY CHESTERFIELD WAY FAIRMEADOW WAY 212THSTW FOXBOROLN PARKDR GERDINE PATH 202ND ST W FORMOSAAVE EU CLID PATH CAMROSEWAY 200TH ST W FAIRHAVEN AVE GANDERLN GAGE AVE EASTON AVE FORTUNE TRL 204TH ST W W TRL ALLAS AVE EASTWOOD AVE DOVER DR ELGIN AVE EASTLAKE DR ENGLISH AVE DRAFTHO R SE BLVD EVENSONGAVE EUREKA AVE FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR CALGARYTRL GLANSHAW AVE F O L S O M P A T H SHAKESPEARE BLVD ROBIN LN GATEWAYDR FRAZERPATH FLINT AVE D U LCIMER CT 198TH ST W 199THSTW D E E R B R O O K E P A T H 175TH ST W FIRELIGH T W A Y EVERESTPATH FRANCHISE WAY UPPER 183RD ST W HERITAGEWAY EVERHILLAVE EXCEPTIO N A L T R L FLUSHINGHILLSC T ENFIELD WAY FIVE OAKS DR FINESSE TRL FAIRHILLAVE 203RDSTW F R E E P O R TWAY 185TH ST W CLAREMONTDR EVENFALL AVE FAIRFAX AVE ELKWOOD AVE ECHO TER ECHO DR ELLICE LN DUNBURY AVE EVELETH CT EVELETH AVE EMBERS AVE GEORGETOWNWAY CARM E L T R L E UC LID S T FIRESIDELN C E NTERFIE L D CT E X C H ANGETRL 188TH ST W B U T T E R N U T T R L GLA CIE R W A Y CA M D E N P A TH E M B RY LN EN C H A N TED WAY D U L U T H S T 174TH ST W E X C E L C T 183RD STW 191STSTW ESQUIRE WAY FRENCH AVE DE NALI CT B U R LI N G T O N P AT H EV E R G R E EN T R L 178TH ST W FOREST ST EMERALD TRL CATTAIL LN CANBYCT F ORFARCT GL A S G O W AV E EN G LE W O O D W A Y FARADAY LN ENCINA PATH C E N T U R Y RD CHANDLER A V E FOLIAGE AVE FIREBIRD CT 169TH ST W 197TH ST W EVEREST TRL DU L U T H CIR FURY CT EXCELSIOR LN ERICKSON P AT H 184TH ST W EV ERT O N CT FULDA TRL ARBOR LN GALLECT EWING ST 198TH CT W E X O D U S A V E ELM ST 14TH ST FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOW WAY DOVER CT LOWERHERITAGEWAY CABRILLA WAY DUNCA N C IR CAMDENCT E S C A L A D E W AY ELLINGTON TRL EUREKACT CA NAR Y PAT H CASTLECT ROMEO DR JULIET DR MACBETH CIR DUNCAN CT FALCONAVE FIELDFARE WAY 201ST ST W F O R MOSACT CENTURYCT GO L DFIN C H DR C A R AV EL CT FONTINA PATH ENCORE CT CANTREL WAY GARR I S O N LN GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL CATTA I L CT BEAUMONTAVE ELY AVE E N R IG H T W A Y EDMONTON AVE EXETER AVE DENALI WAY ELMWOOD CI R 186TH ST W E N R IGHTCT 172ND ST W E S C O R T T R L EXP L O RER WAY CAMBRIA C T EVENINGSTARWAY EAGLEVIEW LN FROST CT D U N B A R A V E UPPER 179TH ST W CALHOUN CT ETHELTON AVE 189TH ST W EUCLID AVE E MPEROR CT EXIRA AVE DIAMOND PATH EAVESWAY FIESTAAVE E NHANCE C T CAESAR ST ENGLISHC T ENIGMAWAY 203RD C T W FIRESTONEWAY 211TH ST W LANGFORDLN CAMBODIA AVE EMPIRE TRL BISCAYNE AVE 220TH ST W FONTANA PA T H LOWER 183RD ST W DESMO N D CT KNUTSEN DR UPPER 204TH ST W C Y P R E S S D R EXLEY AVE FINCH PATH CLEOPATRA D R 177TH ST W EUCLID WAY F R UITWOOD PATH 210TH ST W E S S E N C E T R L GALERY DR FAIR ISLE PATH DULANEY DR EXPORT TRL FAIRMONT AVE EVENSTONDR EXCALIBUR TRL EVENINGTER 192ND ST W CANTON CIR GAGE WAY 176TH ST W TWINPONDCIR 194TH ST W ESTES PATH E X E C UTIVE PA TH EXCLUSIVE PATH DYLAN DR NORTH CREEK LN CHEVELLE AVE CHILI AVE FIELDING WAY D A W S O N L N LOWER 182ND ST W G ET TYSB U R G WAY ELDORADO WAY D E V R IE P ATH EASTOAKS DR COLORADO AVED Y ERSPASS MUNICIPALD R ESTATEAVE GARCIAWAY TAMAR ACKTRL E M B R Y AV E ELKRIDGE TRL 196TH ST W DUPONT WAY EQUINOX AVE FAIRGREEN AVE BEAUMONTWAY ANTHONYDR ESSEX AVE BERRING AVE 230TH ST W 220TH ST W H AMLET CIR EMPIRE TOWNSHIP LAKEVILLE EUREKA TOWNSHIP HILL DEE PARK DAISY KNOLL PARK HILLVIEW PARK LAKE JULIA PARK FARMINGTON PRESERVE PARK FAIR HILLS PARK VERMILLION GROVE PARK PINE KNOLL PARK RAMBLING RIVER PARK WESTVIEW PARK EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK DAKOTA COUNTY ESTATES PARK NORTH CREEK PARK FAIRHILL GREENWAY TROY HILL PARK MEADOWVIEW PARK MIDDLE CREEK PARK SCHMITZ MAKI ARENA PRAIRIE VIEW PARK MARIGOLD PARK TAMARACK PARK SILVER SPRINGS PARK NORTH CREEK GREENWAY JIM BELL PARK AND PRESERVE PRAIRIE WATERWAY GREENWAY PRAIRIE PINES PARK MAIN PINE WILLOW ST 205TH 209TH CAPRI ST 208TH ELM ST OAK ST SPRUCE WALNU 220TH CENTENNIAL DR HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST 12 T H S T HW Y 3 4T H S T 6T H S T 1S T S T DI V I S I O N AK I N R D PI L O T K N O B R D HW Y 3 1 TH 3 / C H I P P E N D A L E A V E W HIGHWAY 50 MAPLE CSAH 50 / 212TH BEECH ST V E R M I L LIO N RIVER V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A K I N R D E A S T V I E W 203RD 200TH EVERH I L L A V E FLAGSTAFF E N G L I S H AVE 19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W EN G L I S H A V E EN G L I S H A V E EM B E R S A V E E M B E R S A V E U P P E R 182ND ST D U N B U R Y A V E N O R T H C R E E K R E GI O N AL TR A I L DE E R B R O O K E P ATH199TH ST W L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y A B C D E F G H I J K CS A H 3 1 / P I L O T K N O B R D CR 64/ 195th ST W 180TH ST W 187TH ST W 185TH ST W C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W KEY EXISTING SIDEWALKS EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD TRAILS PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD TRAILS EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS EXISTING GREENWAYS PROPOSED GREENWAYS PROPOSED ON-STREET BIKEWAYS ACTIVITY AREA EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR TUNNEL) PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS WATER MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN 6/3/19 0 10.5 Miles DRAFT 5/13/19 Figure 3.1 Draft Network Plan 3-4 roadway 8-10’ paved trail 10’ Neighborhood Trail Recommendations Figure 3.2 Typical Neighborhood Trail Section Network Plan Elements the following network Plan elements are shown in the draft network Plan. Neighborhood Trails neighborhood trails are multi-use paved trails that connect residential areas to local parks and to the connector trail network. these trails exist today within established Farmington neighborhoods and are generally aligned with low-volume roadways. these trails are intended for use by pedestrians and bicyclists. Future neighborhood trails are indicated in alignment with the 2040 comprehensive Plan, and future developments are required to build trail connections in new neighborhoods according to these general alignments. »8-10’ wide asphalt-paved trails, to meet neighborhood development standards set by the city of Farmington »curb ramps at all intersection crossings »trail amenities such as lighting, wayfinding, and benches to be determined as needed by neighborhood association or per city of Farmington recommendation »Future funding/implementation: owner/developer Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 3-5 netWork Plan connector trails are multi-use paved trails that connect longer distances across the city. connector trails are generally in alignment with higher volume roadways, such as Pilot knob road, aikin road, and Highway 50. these trails are intended to serve as major connections to schools, parks, commercial, employment and civic areas, as well as provide connections to neighboring communities. connector trails, in combination with Farmington greenways, create a legible, continuous system that provides high-quality trail experience with a rough grid network connection at half mile intervals throughout the entire city. »trail lighting (lower, pedestrian-scaled lighting or bollard-style lighting) »community wayfinding at key intersections, directional signage to key community destinations »High visibility crosswalk markings and curb ramps at roadway crossings »Benches/seating as needed »maximum separation between the roadway and trail for added comfort/safety for trail users »Year-round availability (snow clearing) performed or enforced by the city (phased approach) »minimum 8’ (preferable 10’+) width should be maintained, with potential lane markings »Future developments that are adjacent to or contain plans for future connector trail network segments should align future trails as closely as possible as the plan shows, with the understanding that these trail segments are part of a larger city- wide trail network. »Where feasible, consideration of grade-separated crossings at intersecting high-volume roadways »Future funding/implementation: developers, city of Farmington, regional and local trail/srts grant funding, dakota county, mndot Connector Trails Connector Trail Recommendations roadway 8-10’ paved trail 10’ pedestrian-scaled lighting community waynding Figure 3.3 Typical Connector Trail Section 3-6 Greenways greenways are multi-use paved trails that are located in scenic, natural, parkland, open space, or undeveloped areas. greenways are primarily located independent of an existing roadway. these trails are intended to provide recreational opportunities for bicyclists and pedestrians, with opportunities to connect to the rural or natural landscape. regional trails, such as the Vermillion river greenway and the north creek greenway exist today in Farmington. this plan proposes and supports the continued completion of these trail networks, as well as introduces a few key greenway segments that could provide direct connections to local schools. Farmington’s greenways, in combination with connector trails, create a legible, continuous system that provides high-quality trail experience with a rough grid network connection at half mile intervals throughout the entire city. Greenway Recommendations MILE 8-10’ trail 10’ interpretive sign MILE 8-10’ trail 10’ interpretive sign Figure 3.4 Typical Greenway Section »trailhead locations with on-street or dedicated parking »trail identification (name) and signage at trail access points and at key intersections »minimum 8’ (preferable 10’+) width should be maintained with a 2’ buffer (mowed/cleared area) on either side of the trail »interpretive or educational signage at key locations to inform trail users about local attractions, native plants and wildlife habitat, or cultural/historical markers »Benches and seating at key vistas or viewpoints. Preferably located every half-mile along the trail »Where feasible, consideration of grade-separated crossings at intersecting high-volume roadways »emergency call boxes in remote locations »Year-round availability (snow clearing) performed or enforced by the city (phased approach) »Future funding/implementation: city of Farmington, state/regional/local trail grant funding, outdoor/recreational trail grant funding, dakota county Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 3-7 netWork Plan On-Street Bikeway Recommendations On-Street Bikeways on-street Bikeways are signed bike routes that provide key connections and fill network gaps in the connector trail network. on-street Bikeways are located along existing roadways with low volume traffic, wide right-of-way widths, and low instances of on- street parking. today, it is understood that bicyclists are able to use any roadway in Farmington, provided that the bicyclists follow the rules of the road. For the purposes of this plan, on-street bikeways are not intended to be striped with dedicated bike lanes. However, with future increased use, the city of Farmington may consider upgrading these roadways with dedicated bike lanes upon future evaluation. Figure 3.5 Typical On-Street Bikeway Section roadway + on-street bikeway sidewalksidewalk 10’ bikeway sign »Bikeway signage, to be visible to drivers and bicyclists, located at key intersections and along roadways »roadway markings, where necessary »consistent street lighting throughout bikeway »Future funding/implementation: city of Farmington 3-8 roadway sidewalksidewalk 10’ pedestrian-scaled lighting seating Figure 3.6 Typical Activity Area Section Sidewalks + Activity Areas sidewalks are concrete paved walkways, intended for use by pedestrians to connect within residential areas and commercial areas. sidewalks are essential in urbanized areas to allow for people of all abilities to gain access to businesses, schools, and community destinations. in Farmington, sidewalks are required in new developments along one side of the street. sidewalk connections exist in some parts of the existing neighborhoods north of downtown, and a nearly complete network of sidewalks exist (on both sides of the street) in downtown and in the neighborhoods east of tH3. a number of activity areas have been identified in Farmington; these are areas where there is a high demand for increased pedestrian safety and comfort. Sidewalk + Activity Area Recommendations »on-going effort to complete sidewalk network gaps »enforcement by the city of Farmington for businesses and residents to keep sidewalks clear in the winter »Pedestrian-scaled lighting »curb ramps at all intersections »High visibility crosswalk markings + forward stop bars at major intersections in the downtown commercial area »Wayfinding and distance markers to community destinations »seating, planters, and placemaking elements located within commercial areas »sidewalk replacement/repair schedule as needed »Future funding/implementation: Business owners, property owners, city of Farmington, streetscape/ pedestrian/urban design grant opportunities Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 3-9 netWork Plan Intersection Treatments a number of intersections have been identified for future treatments to improve crossing and visibility for pedestrians and bicyclists. Below are recommended treatments at each intersection (keyed on the draft network Plan). to the left are examples of some of the treatments recommended below. Reduced curb radii: slows traffic at turns and decreases the distance required of pedestrians to cross intersections. User-activated signal: pedestrians use a button to activate a lights, signalling to vehicles to stop and yield. Pedestrian crossing signs: to be placed at the approach of roundabouts, alerting drivers of pedestrian crossings High visibility crosswalks: make pedestrians more visible within crosswalks. Forward stop bars: increase buffer between stopped vehicles and crosswalks at intersections Pilot knob Rd and Upper 182nd St »High visibility crosswalk markings »Forward stop bars »Potential for decreased curb radii »leading Pedestrian interval for ped walk signal »intersection was identified in the dakota county Bike Ped Plan for potential grade separated crossing »requires coordination with dakota county A B C D E F CR 64/195th Street and Pilot knob Rd »‘Pedestrian crossing’ signs to be installed on the right side of approach to intersection at pedestrian crosswalk »requires coordination with dakota county CR 64/195th Street and Akin Rd »‘Pedestrian crossing’ signs to be installed on the right side of approach to intersection at pedestrian crosswalk »requires coordination with dakota county CR 64/195th Street and Highway 3 »‘Pedestrian crossing’ signs to be installed on the right side of approach to intersection at pedestrian crosswalk »requires coordination with dakota county + mndot CSAH 50 and Akin Rd/Denmark Ave »High visibility crosswalk markings »Forward stop bars »requires coordination with dakota county (Future) Vermillion Greenway and Highway 3 »High visibility crosswalk markings »Forward stop bars »requires coordination with dakota county 3-10 Grade-separated crossings: trail overpasses or tunnels that allow trail users to avoid crossing intersections with vehicular or rail traffic. Pedestrian Islands: concrete barriers or raised curbs that provide protection for pedestrians at crosswalks. Pedestrian islands decrease the distance required for pedestrians to cross a busy roadway. G H I J k willow St and 8th Street (at Dairy Queen/Highway 3) »High visibility crosswalk crossing Willow street, to be coordinated with future shared use path aligned with Highway 3 Elm St and Highway 3 »High visibility crosswalks (existing) »Forward stop bars »leading pedestrian interval / signal countdown »improve pedestrian island »requires coordination with mndot Spruce St and Highway 3 »Potential location for future user-activated signal, such as rrFB or HaWk signal »requires high visibility crosswalks »requires lowered speed limit to 35mph or lower along Highway 3 »requires coordination with mndot Beech St/Maple St and Highway 3 »Potential location for future user-activated signal, such as rrFB or HaWk signal, to connect students to Farmington elementary school »requires high visibility crosswalks »requires lowered speed limit to 35mph or lower along Highway 3 »requires coordination with mndot CR 50/220th St and Highway 3 »High visibility crosswalks (existing) »Forward stop bars »leading pedestrian interval »Pedestrian crossing to connect to future trail connection east of Highway 3 »requires coordination with mndot Leading pedestrian intervals: updated signal timing allows for pedestrians to cross a roadway before vehicles. This allows pedestrians the ability to get a head start on crossing the intersection while all traffic is stopped. 0-7 seconds 7+ seconds Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 3-11 netWork Plan System Recommendations the following system recommendations have been developed to augment and support the network Plan: 1. Trail alignments within new developments may vary from the Bike + Ped Network Plan and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, but should generally follow the alignments shown to connect to adjacent trails, per guidance from City of Farmington planning, engineering and parks staff. »Future trails are shown in the 2040 comprehensive Plan (2018). these trails are also shown in the Bike + Ped network Plan (2019), along with future trails and sidewalks per the downtown redevelopment Plan (2016). in general, new developments in Farmington are required to include sidewalks and trails, per the city of Farmington development code. it is important that these new trails and sidewalks connect to adjacent and/or existing trails and sidewalks to contribute to a continuous and comfortable bike and pedestrian network, with neighborhoods that are well connected to other neighborhoods and destinations throughout the city. 2. The City of Farmington will be responsible for winter snow removal along Connector and Greenway Trails as designated in the Bike + Ped Network Plan. »the connector trail network is intended to serve the largest number of people throughout the year to connect residents and visitors across the city to important community destinations such as parks, schools, and commercial areas. greenways are intended to provide recreational connections to scenic and natural areas. By committing to year-round trail access, the city of Farmington is extending the use of their existing network, while providing opportunities for people with disabilities, children, seniors, and others to choose walking or biking as a viable mode of transportation year-round. »today, much of the existing connector trail and existing greenway trail network is cleared year-round by the city of Farmington, with four levels of plowing priorities. downtown sidewalks and the 195th street trail are first priority, with trails leading to schools and/or bus stops as second priority. outdoor rinks are third priority and other trail loops are fourth priority. as this system functions today, generally existing connector trails are first or second priority, and greenways are fourth priority. as new trails are constructed, the city will need to evaluate the plowing priority for new segments. »Future evaluation of this recommendation may lead to extending city-sponsored snow removal for activity areas. 3-12 »today, all Farmington residents are responsible for clearing of snow and ice for sidewalks and trails within their property; future evaluation of this recommendation may lead to changes in this city-wide policy. 3. All Farmington Schools will be connected to trail and/or sidewalk facilities to ensure Safe Routes to Schools. The City of Farmington will coordinate with the Farmington School District to ensure bicycle and pedestrian connections are continued to each school’s main entryway. »today, schools in Farmington are accessible by biking and walking to varying degrees; some Farmington schools are located where there are significant challenges to walking and biking to school by students. the network Plan prioritizes connections to all schools in Farmington through future trail and sidewalk connections, as well as enhanced intersection treatments. »events at schools, such as athletic events or performances draw an increased amount of vehicular traffic and on-street parking near schools. to accommodate safe roadway and parking lot access for pedestrians and bicyclists, special consideration should be made with high visibility crosswalk markings and other enhanced safety measures beyond the immediate school boundary. »the city will encourage all schools to participate in safe routes to school program, and participate in safe routes to school planning and implementation where possible. 4. Establish pedestrian priority zones to support design standards that encourage walking in destination-filled locations. These locations are noted in the Network Plan as Activity Areas, and include: »downtown Farmington »emerging activity centers (to be determined with future development) »Within the activity areas, it is important to provide a continuous and comfortable network for pedestrians, to allow movement between clusters of destinations, such as parks, local businesses, and civic centers. today, downtown Farmington has an established grid street network that lends itself well to pedestrian connections, however there are gaps in sidewalks and trails today, and the railroad poses a barrier to east-west travel. in the future, as roadways are re-constructed and improved in activity areas, sidewalks, trails, and other pedestrian amenities should be considered within the design. »continue to establish rambling river Park and the depot Way art walk as an “active gateway” to the city and enhance their connection to downtown Farmington. Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 3-13 netWork Plan 5. Consider enhanced safety measures for Connector and Greenway Trails at all roadway crossings where traffic volumes are high or where safety for all roadway and trail users is a concern. »High-volume roadways are generally defined have more than 10,000 vehicles per day. »safety measures for connector and greenway trails at these intersections may include: -Grade-separated crossings such as tunnels or bridges -High-visibility crosswalks -User-activated signals or signal-timing upgrades (Leading Pedestrian Intervals) -Increased signage »Future intersection upgrades should be coordinated with the appropriate agencies and may need further study to determine the appropriate safety measures. 6. Improve communication of the bike and ped network. »develop a coordinated wayfinding and signage strategy to communicate priority and greenway trail networks »create and post updated trail and bikeway routes using city communications 7. Develop encouragement and educational programs that promote a culture of biking and walking in Farmington. »Work with rambling river center to develop walking and biking clubs for seniors and families »expand the bicycle fleet in use today by the Farmington school district to support programming developed by the rambling river center, or community education »Work with the Farmington Police department to host bike rodeos or safety demonstrations at community events »coordinate an open streets event in Farmington where a block or two of roadway is closed to vehicle traffic for an afternoon or day and outdoor community events are hosted. »Promote bike racks at local businesses and civic buildings, and provide information through the chamber of commerce to promote bicycle-friendly business practices. Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n CHAPTER 4 Implementation Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 4-2 Implementation Plan 4-2 Implementation Recommendations 4-4 Phasing Strategy 4-12 Operations + Maintenance 4-13 Funding Strategies 4-1 imPlementation 4-2 Implementation Plan the Bike + Ped Plan for the city of Farmington outlines goals for the walking and biking network and system plan for the next 10 years. the implementation Plan focuses on how to transform the plan into reality. First, some general implementation recommendations are outlined, which are intended to provide guidance for policy and coordination of implementation efforts. a phasing strategy is outlined, which breaks tasks down into priority, on-going, and long-term projects. next, a breakdown of projected costs for capital projects as well as maintenance and operations are outlined. Finally, a number of funding resources are identified in this chapter. Implementation Recommendations the following recommendations have been developed to assist with policy and implementation of the plan: 1. Coordinate with other agencies (MnDOT, Dakota County, Empire Township, Lakeville, Eureka Township, Castle Rock, Farmington School District, Community Ed) to incorporate Farmington Bike + Ped Plan elements into their planning and areas of responsibility. »an annual bike + ped planning meeting could be hosted by the city of Farmington to evaluate and identify collaborative projects. »the city of Farmington and dakota county have a history of working collaboratively on the design and construction of trails and sidewalks within dakota county right-of-ways. in the last 10 years, the city and county have worked together to develop approved regional greenway master plans that will connect the city to the county’s regional park and trail system. -Today, 30% (13 miles) of the existing trail network in Farmington is within Dakota County right-of-way. -In the planning process for the Bike + Ped Plan, Dakota County Transportation staff worked with the project team to identify specific intersection treatments at round-abouts on county roadways. Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 4-3 imPlementation »state Highway 3 has been identified as a significant barrier to cross-city travel by bicyclists and pedestrians, both through this planning effort as well as through the recent Highway 3 corridor Plan. -In the planning process for the Bike + Ped Plan, MnDOT Transportation staff worked with the project team to identify future trail connections along Highway 3, as well as the potential for a lowered speed limit along Highway 3 through Farmington. With future decreased speed limits, there is possibility of implementing user-activated and high-visibility crosswalks to connect bicyclists and pedestrians across Highway 3. 2. Regularly evaluate progress of the implementation of the Plan. »annually update city gis files »annually review progress on recommendations »determine projects to include in ciP, projects to pursue grant funding »this plan is intended to provide guidance for the next 10 years; consider a Bike + Ped Plan update in coordination with the 2050 comprehensive Plan update. 3. Consider an on-going Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee, potentially alongside the City Parks Commission »role to assist with implementation and evaluation of plan elements »consider rotating members, terms of service, role/charge, diverse viewpoints. 4-4 Phasing Strategy identifying priorities and demonstrating visible, measurable progress is essential to implement the plan to maintain momentum to reach longer-term goals. Priority Projects recommended priority projects have been identified through community outreach, as well as with input from the BPP committee and city staff. these priority projects are projected to have the biggest impact for improving safety and comfort for pedestrian and bicycle movement in Farmington. Priority projects are intended to be completed or have substantial progress towards completion in the next 1-5 years. see Figure 4.1 and table 4.1 for a keyed plan and table of Priority Projects. »intersection treatments: -Coordinate with Dakota County Transportation to install high visibility crosswalk markings and pedestrian crossing signs at the approach of round-about intersections along 195th Street. -Coordinate with Dakota County Transportation to address intersection treatments at Pilot Knob Road / Upper 195th Street and at Akin Road/CSAH 50. -Coordinate with MnDOT to implement enhanced intersection treatments at Elm Street and TH3. »tH3 Pedestrian safety and connector trail: -A trail connection along TH 3 from 205th Street to the southern City limits along with enhanced safety for pedestrian crossings at a number of intersections along TH 3 in Farmington have been strongly identified by the community as priority projects. -Coordination with MnDOT is key to moving forward. While it may not be feasible to construct the TH3 trail in the next 1-3 years due to lack of funding, progress can be made towards working with MnDOT to lower the speed limit through this area, which will pave the way for implementation of intersection treatments, such as user-activated signals at Spruce Street and Maple Street. Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 4-5 imPlementation »connector trail and on-street Bikeways within downtown Farmington: -On-Street Bikeway on Willow Street and 4th Street -On-Street Bikeway along 205th Street (funded and planned for implementation 2019) -Connector Trail from Akin Road and CSAH 50/Denmark Avenue to Spruce Street, Spruce Street from Denmark Ave to TH 3 (Denmark Ave to Division Street funded and planned for implementation 2021/2022) »connector trail and greenway trail connections -Connector Trail along Flagstaff Ave from 195th Street to CSAH 50) to serve Farmington High School, including connection to 200th Street south of Meadowview Elementary School -Connector Trail missing segment on west side of Pilot Knob Road south of 197th Street (Identified by Dakota County as a High Priority Trail Gap) -North Creek Greenway connection to Lakeville and boardwalk section at North Creek Park (funded and planned construction for 2021) »Wayfinding Plan -Complete a city-wide wayfinding and signage plan to correspond with the Bike + Ped Network Plan -To include locations and design of wayfinding »educational and encouragement Programs -Work with Rambling River Center to develop walking and biking clubs for seniors and families -Expand the bicycle fleet in use today by the Farmington School District to support programming developed by the Rambling River Center, or Community Education -Work with the Farmington Police Department to host bike rodeos or safety demonstrations at community events -Coordinate an Open Streets event in Farmington where a block or two of roadway is closed to vehicle traffic for an afternoon or day and outdoor community events are hosted. -Promote bike racks at local businesses and civic buildings, and provide information through the chamber of commerce to promote bicycle=friendly business practices. Figure 4.1 Phasing Plan: Priority Projects 4-6 FARMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVI P. DODGE MIDDLE SCHOOL RIVERVIEWELEMENTARY SCHOOL FARMINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ROBERT BOECKMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HILL DEE PARK DAISYKNOLL PARK HILLVIEW PARK LAKE JULIA PARK FARMINGTON PRESERVEPARK FAIR HILLS PARK VERMILLION GROVE PARK PINE KNOLL PARK RAMBLING RIVERPARK WESTVIEW PARK EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK DAKOTA COUNTYESTATES PARK NORTH CREEK PARK FAIRHILL GREENWAY TROY HILLPARK MEADOWVIEW PARK MIDDLECREEK PARK SCHMITZMAKI ARENA PRAIRIE VIEWPARK MARIGOLD PARK TAMARACK PARK SILVER SPRINGS PARK NORTHCREEK GREENWAY JIM BELL PARK AND PRESERVE PRAIRIE WATERWAY GREENWAY PRAIRIEPINES PARK MAIN PINE WILLOW ST 205TH 209TH CAPRI ST 208TH ELM ST OAK ST SPRUCE WALNU 220TH CENTENNIAL DR HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST 12 T H S T HW Y 3 4T H S T 6T H S T 1S T S T DI V I S I O N AK I N R D PI L O T K N O B R D HW Y 3 1 TH 3 / C H I P P E N D A L E A V E W HIGHWAY 50 MAPLE CSAH 50 / 212TH BEECH ST V E R M I L LIO N RIVER V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A K I N R D E A S T V I E W 203RD 200TH EVERH I L L A V E FLAGSTAFF E N G L I S H AVE 19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W EN G L I S H A V E EN G L I S H A V E EM B E R S A V E E M B E R S A V E U P P E R 182ND ST D U N B U R Y A V E N O R T H C R E E K R E GI O N AL TR A I L DEE R B R O O K E P ATH199TH ST W L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y EXISTING TRAILSPRIORITY PROJECTS PHASING PLAN KEY ON-GOING PROJECTS LONG-TERM PROJECTS PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS PROPOSED GREENWAYS PROPOSED ON-STREET BIKEWAYS ACTIVITY AREA EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR TUNNEL)WATER PARKS SCHOOLS MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN 6/6/19 0 10.5 Miles 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 4-7 imPlementation Map Key Project Description Potential Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy 1 Intersection treatments at round-abouts along 195th Street Dakota County $10,000 - $12,000 (4) signs with pavement markings x 3 intersections General Funds (Dakota County) 2 Intersection treatment at Pilot Knob Road/Upper 195th Street Dakota County $2,000 - $5,000 pavement markings, curb extensions General Funds (Dakota County), State Aid Funds 3 Intersection treatment at Akin Road/CSAH 50 Dakota County $500 - $1,000 pavement markings General Funds (Dakota County), State Aid Funds 4 Intersection treatments at Elm Street and TH3 MnDOT $2,000 - $3,000 pavement markings, signal timing General Funds (MnDOT), State Aid Funds 5 TH 3 Connector Trail MnDOT $630,000 - $850,000 2.0 miles General Funds (MnDOT), State Aid Funds 6 Intersection Treatments on TH3 (Willow Street, Spruce Street, Maple/Beech Street, CSAH 50) MnDOT, Dakota County $6,000 - pavement markings, signal timing, curb extensions, user- activated signals General Funds (MnDOT), State Aid Funds 7 On-Street Bikeway on Willow and 4th Streets 4,000 - $5,000 6,600 LF General Funds (City of Farmington) 8 On-Street Bikeway on 205th Street Empire Township n/a (funded)$1,600 LF n/a (funded) 9 Connector Trail from Aikin Road/CSAH 50 to Spruce Street, Spruce Street from Denmark Ave to TH3) Farmington Public Schools $450,000 - $600,000 7,500 LF General Funds (City of Farmington); partially funded and planned for construction in 2021/2022, Local Trail Connections Grant, Regional Solicitation Grant 10 Connector Trail on Flagstaff Avenue from 195th Street to CSAH 50, Connection to 200th Street Farmington Public Schools $1,200,000 - $1,600,000 20,000 LF General Funds (City of Farmington) Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Grant, Regional Solicitation Grant, Local Trail Connections Grant 11 Connector Trail segment on Pilot Knob Road south of 197th Street Dakota County $84,000 - $112,000 1,400 LF General Funds, State Aid Funds 12 North Creek Greenway Connection to Lakeville and boardwalk section at North Creek Park Dakota County n/a (funded) 2.1 miles, boardwalk connection Funded through Regional Solicitation Grants for implementation 2021/2022 13 Wayfinding Plan Dakota County $15,000 - $25,000 Plan to guide wayfinding locations and design SHIP Funds, General Funds (City of Farmington), Regional Solicitation Grant 14 Educational and Encouragement Programs Rambling River Center, Community Education, Farmington Police Department, Farmington Public Schools, Farmington Chamber of Commerce n/a n/a SHIP Funding, General Gunds (City of Farmington), Grant funding, Safe Routes to School Priority Projects Capital Costs Table 4.1 Capital Costs: Priority Projects 4-8 On-Going Projects the following projects have been identified as medium-priority, to be completed as funding or opportunities become available. see Figure 4.2 and table 4.2 for a keyed plan and table of on-going Projects. »connector trail, on-street Bikeways, and greenway trails around downtown Farmington: -On-Street Bikeways along 1st Street from Rambling River Park to CR 50, 12th Street and Spruce Street in Prairie View Park, Centennial/Evergreen Knoll Park -Connector Trails on Maple Street, 6th Street, CR 50, Vermillion River Trail, Elm Street/3rd Street/Pine Street »other trails and on-street Bikeways: -On-Street Bikeway on Everhill Avenue to 195th Street -On-Street Bikeways on Embers Avenue, English Avenue, 185th Street W and Upper 182nd Street W -Greenway Trail through Farmington Preserve Park -Greenway Trail to Daisy Knoll Park from Pilot Knob Road -Greenway Trail from North Creek Park to tunnel under 195th Street »sidewalk and activity area improvements in downtown Farmington -To be completed as roadways are improved/reconstructed »trail recommendations: -High visibility crosswalks, curb extensions, and forward stop bars at Connector and Greenway Trail intersections -Lighting, seating, and interpretation along Connector and Greenway segments »complete safe routes to school Plans for all schools in the district Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 4-9 imPlementation long-Term Projects the following projects have been identified as long-term projects. these projects will require larger fundraising efforts and collaborative planning with dakota county, neighboring townships, and future development. see Figure 4.2 and table 4.2 for a keyed plan and table of long-term Projects. »lake marion, north creek, and Vermillion river greenway segments in Farmington (in coordination with dakota county) »greenway loop from northwest Farmington to future north creek greenway »connector trail extensions on Flagstaff avenue north of 195th street and south of csaH 50, eastview/eaton avenue, 200th street, 190th street W, 203rd street, diamond Path, and future roadways in northeast Farmington as development occurs Figure 4.2 Phasing Plan: On-Going and Long-Term Projects 4-10 FARMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVI P. DODGE MIDDLE SCHOOL RIVERVIEWELEMENTARY SCHOOL FARMINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ROBERT BOECKMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HILL DEE PARK DAISYKNOLL PARK HILLVIEW PARK LAKE JULIA PARK FARMINGTON PRESERVEPARK FAIR HILLS PARK VERMILLION GROVE PARK PINE KNOLL PARK RAMBLING RIVERPARK WESTVIEW PARK EVERGREEN KNOLL PARK DAKOTA COUNTYESTATES PARK NORTH CREEK PARK FAIRHILL GREENWAY TROY HILLPARK MEADOWVIEW PARK MIDDLECREEK PARK SCHMITZMAKI ARENA PRAIRIE VIEWPARK MARIGOLD PARK TAMARACK PARK SILVER SPRINGS PARK NORTHCREEK GREENWAY JIM BELL PARK AND PRESERVE PRAIRIE WATERWAY GREENWAY PRAIRIEPINES PARK MAIN PINE WILLOW ST 205TH 209TH CAPRI ST 208TH ELM ST OAK ST SPRUCE WALNU 220TH CENTENNIAL DR HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST 12 T H S T HW Y 3 4T H S T 6T H S T 1S T S T DI V I S I O N AK I N R D PI L O T K N O B R D HW Y 3 1 TH 3 / C H I P P E N D A L E A V E W HIGHWAY 50 MAPLE CSAH 50 / 212TH BEECH ST V E R M I L LIO N RIVER V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A K I N R D E A S T V I E W 203RD 200TH EVERH I L L A V E FLAGSTAFF E N G L I S H AVE 19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W EN G L I S H A V E EN G L I S H A V E EM B E R S A V E E M B E R S A V E U P P E R 182ND ST D U N B U R Y A V E N O R T H C R E E K R E GI O N AL TR A I L DEE R B R O O K E P ATH199TH ST W L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y EXISTING TRAILSPRIORITY PROJECTS PHASING PLAN KEY ON-GOING PROJECTS LONG-TERM PROJECTS PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS PROPOSED GREENWAYS PROPOSED ON-STREET BIKEWAYS ACTIVITY AREA EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR TUNNEL)WATER PARKS SCHOOLS MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN 6/6/19 0 10.5 Miles 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1013 14 15 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n Map Key Project Description Potential Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy 1 On-Street Bikeways on 1st Street, 12th Street and Spruce Street, and in the Centennial neighborhood Downtown Businesses $7,000 - $9,000 11,400 LF General Funds (City of Farmington) 2 Connector Trails on Maple Street, 6th Street, CR 50, Beech Street near Farmington Elementary and Middle Schools Farmington School District $700,000 - $950,000 11,800 LF Safe Routes to School Grants, Local Trail Connections, General Funds (City of Farmington) 3 Connector Trail on Vermillion River Trail, Willow Street Downtown Businesses $500,000 - $720,000 9,100 LF Local Trail Connections Grant, Development 4 Connector Trail on Elm Street, 3rd Street, Pine Street near Rambling River Park $195,000 - $270,000 3350 LF Local Trail Connections Grant, MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General Funds (City of Farmington) 5 On-Street Bikeway on Everhill Avenue $2,000 3000 LF General Funds (City of Farmington) 6 On-Street Bikeways on Embers Avenue, English Avenue, 185th Street W and Upper 182nd Street W $10,500 15,800 LF General Funds (City of Farmington) 7 Greenway Trail through Farmington Preserve Park $49,000 - $66,000 820 LF General Funds (City of Farmington), MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant 8 Greenway Trail to Daisy Knoll Park $114000 - $152,000 1,900 LF General Funds (City of Farmington), MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant 9 Greenway Trail from North Creek Park to tunnel under 195th Street Dakota County $186,000 - $248,000 3,100 LF Regional Solicitation Grants, General Funds (City of Farmington), MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant 10 Sidewalk and Activity Area improvements in Downtown Farmington Downtown Businesses General Funds (City of Farmington), Regional Solicitation Grant 11 Trail Recommendations (intersection treatments, lighting, seating, interpretation) Dakota County, Farmington School District, Downtown Businesses Regional Solicitation Grants, Local Trail Connections, General Funds (City of Farmington) 12 Safe Routes to School Plans MnDOT, Farmington School District MnDOT Safe Routes to School Planning Assistance Map Key Project Description Potential Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy 13 Lake Marion Greenway Dakota County $875,000 - $1.2M 14,600 LF Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington) 14 North Creek Greenway Dakota County $270,000 - $360,000 4,500 LF Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington) 15 Vermillion River Greenway Dakota County, Empire Township $430,000 - $575,000 7,200 LF Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington) 16 Farmington Greenway Loop Developers, Farmington Public Schools $2.0M - 2.8M 34,500 LF Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General Funds (City of Farmington), Developers 17 Connector Trail Extensions (Flagstaff Ave, Eastview/Eaton Ave, 200th Street, 190th Street, 203rd Street, Diamond Path, future roadways in northeast Farmington Developers, adjacent Townships and cities, MnDOT $3.2M - $4.2M 53,000 LF Developers, Local Trail Connection grants, General Funds (City of Farmington, MnDOT) On-Going Projects Capital Costs Long-Term Projects Capital Costs Map Key Project Description Potential Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy 1 On-Street Bikeways on 1st Street, 12th Street and Spruce Street, and in the Centennial neighborhood Downtown Businesses $7,000 - $9,000 11,400 LF General Funds (City of Farmington) 2 Connector Trails on Maple Street, 6th Street, CR 50, Beech Street near Farmington Elementary and Middle Schools Farmington School District $700,000 - $950,000 11,800 LF Safe Routes to School Grants, Local Trail Connections, General Funds (City of Farmington) 3 Connector Trail on Vermillion River Trail, Willow Street Downtown Businesses $500,000 - $720,000 9,100 LF Local Trail Connections Grant, Development 4 Connector Trail on Elm Street, 3rd Street, Pine Street near Rambling River Park $195,000 - $270,000 3350 LF Local Trail Connections Grant, MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General Funds (City of Farmington) 5 On-Street Bikeway on Everhill Avenue $2,000 3000 LF General Funds (City of Farmington) 6 On-Street Bikeways on Embers Avenue, English Avenue, 185th Street W and Upper 182nd Street W $10,500 15,800 LF General Funds (City of Farmington) 7 Greenway Trail through Farmington Preserve Park $49,000 - $66,000 820 LF General Funds (City of Farmington), MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant 8 Greenway Trail to Daisy Knoll Park $114000 - $152,000 1,900 LF General Funds (City of Farmington), MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant 9 Greenway Trail from North Creek Park to tunnel under 195th Street Dakota County $186,000 - $248,000 3,100 LF Regional Solicitation Grants, General Funds (City of Farmington), MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant 10 Sidewalk and Activity Area improvements in Downtown Farmington Downtown Businesses General Funds (City of Farmington), Regional Solicitation Grant 11 Trail Recommendations (intersection treatments, lighting, seating, interpretation) Dakota County, Farmington School District, Downtown Businesses Regional Solicitation Grants, Local Trail Connections, General Funds (City of Farmington) 12 Safe Routes to School Plans MnDOT, Farmington School District MnDOT Safe Routes to School Planning Assistance Map Key Project Description Potential Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy 13 Lake Marion Greenway Dakota County $875,000 - $1.2M 14,600 LF Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington) 14 North Creek Greenway Dakota County $270,000 - $360,000 4,500 LF Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington) 15 Vermillion River Greenway Dakota County, Empire Township $430,000 - $575,000 7,200 LF Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington) 16 Farmington Greenway Loop Developers, Farmington Public Schools $2.0M - 2.8M 34,500 LF Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General Funds (City of Farmington), Developers 17 Connector Trail Extensions (Flagstaff Ave, Eastview/Eaton Ave, 200th Street, 190th Street, 203rd Street, Diamond Path, future roadways in northeast Farmington Developers, adjacent Townships and cities, MnDOT $3.2M - $4.2M 53,000 LF Developers, Local Trail Connection grants, General Funds (City of Farmington, MnDOT) On-Going Projects Capital Costs Long-Term Projects Capital Costs Table 4.2 Capital Costs: On-Going Projects 4-11 imPlementation Quantity (Miles) Quantity (Feet) Annual O + M Cost Total O+M Annual Cost Capital Cost Total Projected Capital / Replacement Costs Estimated Life Notes Existing Asphalt Trails 46.8 Miles 247,104 Feet $1,200 - $2,000 / Mile $56,160 - $93,600 $60 / LF 14.8 M 30 years Assumes trails 8' wide or less Proposed Asphalt Trails 35.9 Miles 189,663 Feet $1,200 - $2,000 / Mile $43,080 - $71,800 $80 / LF $15.2 M 30 years Assumes 10' wide trails Proposed On-Street Bikeways 7.9 Miles 41,832 Feet $3,500 / Mile $27,650 30 years Assumes (2) signs every 600' Existing Sidewalks 31.0 Miles 163,502 Feet $45 / LF $7.4M 15-30 years Assumes a 6' wide sidewalk Table 4.4 General Operations, Maintenance and Capital Costs 4-12 Operations + Maintenance today, the city of Farmington maintains 46.8 miles of asphalt trails, along with 31.0 miles of sidewalks, 1.5 miles of natural surface trails, boardwalks and pedestrian bridges. these facilities all vary in anticipated life cycle, and required maintenance. Snow/Ice Removal snow and ice removal are key to providing safe access to trails and sidewalks year-round. in Farmington, residents are responsible for maintaining clear paths for sidewalks and trails adjacent to or within their property. the city of Farmington clears trails, sidewalks, and outdoor rinks that are indicated on the snow removal Plan. this plan prioritizes sidewalks in downtown, the trail along 195th street, and trails leading to schools and bus stops. this plan recommends integrating all newly constructed trails into the snow removal Plan as necessary. connector and greenway trails are recommended for future clearing/plowing by the city. an evaluation of the snow removal Plan should be performed annually to revise routes and priorities, ensuring that connections to key community destinations are cleared of snow and ice throughout the winter. Pavement Management in 2012, the city implemented an annual pavement management program for asphalt trail maintenance. this program has been successful in providing annual funding for crack and fog sealing of trails. the city is broken into five areas, resulting in trail maintenance occurring every five years for each segment. However, this system may have been put into place too late for many of the older segments of trails that were installed over 30 years ago. these sections have deteriorated past a point of repair and will likely need to be replaced in the coming years. these replaced trails will then be on-track to receive regular maintenance as part of the pavement management program. this plan recommends a phased approach to replacement of existing trails over the next 5-10 years, along with integrating existing and future trails into the pavement management program. the table below shows projected maintenance and capital costs. Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 4-13 imPlementation Funding Strategies achieving the vision for a well-connected bicycle and pedestrian network in Farmington will take significant funding, not only for construction of new facilities, but also for on-going maintenance of existing and future facilities. capital improvement projects in parks and trails have been funded over the years in Farmington through two funding sources: »Funds received from residential, commercial and industrial development, received as cash in-lieu of land through the park dedication process »transfers through the city’s municipal liquor store profit With most capital funding tied to new development, investment has been inconsistent over the years. most of the Priority Projects, as identified in this plan, will need to be funded independently of private development, through collaborative efforts, grants, and potential increase in funds allocated through the city’s general funds. General Funds general funds should be used as a primary source for on-going maintenance, operations, and amenities for the bike and pedestrian system. capital improvements can also be funded through general funds. general funds are often used as a match for grant funding. Dedicated Tax levy a city can hold a referendum for a dedicated tax levy with proceeds directed specifically for parks and recreation. this levy can be used for capital projects as well as operations and maintenance. the proceeds may be in place of or supplement general funds. the advantage of a dedicated tax levy is that parks and recreation receives a more stable source of funding and does not have to compete with other city priorities for funding on an annual basis. Bonding general obligation Bonds and revenue Bonds provide another source of implementation funding for new facilities, and in some cases, can provide funding for repairs and upgrades of existing facilities. residents can decide to raise revenue through a permanent or temporary tax increase dedicated for specific purposes such as park, trail, and bikeway improvements and maintenance. these funds are usually provided through bonds approved as part of a voter referendum. 4-14 State Aid Funds state aid funds are available for pedestrian and bicycle improvements on state aid roadways. this funding source is particularly useful at the time of street construction or re- construction. Partnerships Public and private partnerships have the potential to provide a wide array of funding opportunities beyond the traditional municipal models. Partnerships with dakota county have proven to be successful in building the existing trail network in Farmington. Further partnerships with Farmington school district, community education, and local businesses will be important for implementation of events and programming, and can support future grant writing efforts as well. organizations with partner funding can also provide assistance with design, outreach, or maintenance/ stewardship of facilities. Partnerships and relationships with local businesses can result in easements, use agreements, or donated funds for future bike and ped facilities. Donations Private donations are a potential funding source; these may be from individuals or area corporations, or donations of labor from recreation clubs or use agreements. “adopt-a-trail” programs, memorial bench donations, and incentives for local businesses to provide bike racks are all examples of how organizations, businesses, and individuals could help with maintenance and funding, while raising awareness and enthusiasm of the bike/ped system. Grants grant funding throughout dakota county has had a positive impact on the implementation of local and regional bicycle and pedestrian network. grant funding generally requires a match by the city, likely through general funds. grant funding also typically favors larger, capital projects over maintenance and operations funding. grant funding might also require evidence of partnerships and community engagement and support for specific requests. the following are some grant opportunities that could be pursued for implementation of plan elements, along with links for more information: Regional Solicitation Grants for Bike/Ped Facilities the metropolitan council allocates federal funds through regional solicitation grants. Funding priorities include multi-use trails, bicycle facilities, grade-separated crossings, filling network gaps, intersection/crossing treatments, sidewalks, streetscaping, ada improvements, and safe routes to school infrastructure projects. these grants are available on 2-year funding cycle, with the next solicitation for grant applications anticipated in early 2020. https://metrocouncil.org/transportation/Planning-2/transportation- Funding/regional-solicitation-neW.aspx Fa r m i n g t o n B i k e a n d P e d e s t r i a n P l a n 4-15 imPlementation local Trail Connections (lTC) local trail connections grants are administered through mn dnr. these grants fund relatively short trail connections between where people live and desired community destinations, and are not intended for funding significant new trails. Funding prioritizes projects with significant connectivity, high expected use, and attractive integration of cultural and natural resources. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/recreation/trails_local.html Safe Routes to School Grants (MnDOT) mndot administers grant funding to support safe routes to school (srts) Planning assistance and plan development to support schools’ effort to promote safe biking and walking for students on a daily basis. small micro-grants are occasionally available to fund educational or encouragement programs such as bike fleets and bike rodeos. srts Plans are generally used as a foundation for cities and school districts to apply for srts infrastructure grants. infrastructure grants support capital funding for projects that promote and encourage biking and walking to school, such as trails, sidewalks, and other bike/ped facilities near schools. other example projects include traffic calming, crosswalk signals, bicycle parking and ada improvements. srts Planning assistance and infrastructure grants are generally available on an annual basis. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/saferoutes/grants-funding.html MN DNR Natural and Scenic Area Grants the mn dnr natural and scenic area grants are intended to protect and provide public access to high quality natural and scenic areas. example projects include trails, overlooks interpretive displays, benches, wayfinding and trailhead parking. all projects must align with the state outdoor recreation Plan (scorP). this grant is typically available annually, with an application deadline in early spring. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/land/natural-scenic-app-cycle.html MN DNR Outdoor Recreation Grants the mn dnr outdoor recreation grant is intended to fund projects that increase and enhance outdoor recreation facilities in local and community parks throughout the state. all projects must align with the state outdoor recreation Plan (scorP). example projects include internal park trails and trail amenities. this grant is typically available annually, with an application deadline in early spring. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/recreation/outdoor_rec.html TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:C ity C ommunicaon P roces s es P res entaon DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D O ne of the Commis s ion's 2 0 2 0 w ork plan goals is to learn about how the city communicates with the public. At the J anuar y 2020 meeng the C ommis s ion discussed a number of things about the pres entaon including the follow ing: w ould like the pr es entaon to occur at the A pril 8 meeng if it w or ks in the Communicaon S pecialis t's s chedule how the city us es s ocial media to promote ev ents , programs, volunteer oppor tunies , etc. to the public the ming of when informaon is s hared w ith the public about events , pr ogr ams and other city informaon how the city tr ies to reach people w ho aren’t connected with devices , or don’t take the me to learn about what is going on in the city L auren S iebenaler the city 's Communicaon S pecialis t w as contacted about her availability and about the informaon the C ommis s ion would like to r eceive during the presentaon. M s . S iebenaler indicated she is av ailable to a-end the A pril 8 Commission meeng to make a presentaon about city communicaons including the infor maon the Commission is reques ng to be included in the pr es entaon. T he C ommis s ion s hould have a connued dis cus s ion in order to determine if there ar e any other items it w is hes to hav e cov er ed by Ms. S iebenaler about the city communicaon proces s . TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:O pen Meeng L aw Rev iew DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D A nnually its good for the Commission to receiv e a review of the M innesota S tate S tatute that pertains to the open meeng law. A(ached is a copy of infor maon about the open meeng law. C ommis s ion members are as ked to r ead prior to the meeng the a(ached open meeng law infor maon, come prepared to receiv e a pres entaon about it and then discuss and ask any ques ons y ou may have. No formal acon is r equir ed, this is for informaonal purpos es only. AT TAC HMENT S : Type Desc rip tion Backup Material Open Meeting Law Information TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:Review Work S es s ion w ith C ity C ouncil DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D T he C ommis s ion will be meeng with the C ity C ouncil during the February 1 0 C ity Council work ses s ion. T he purpos e of the C ommis s ion meeng w ith the C ity C ouncil is to dis cus s the dev elopment of J im Bell Park and P res er ve. The Commission members s hould discuss the meeng that occur red w ith the C ity Council in order to s hare w ith one another s ome feedback about the outcome of the meeng. TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:Round Table Format DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D T he round table agenda item allow s Commis s ion members to share infor maon, or as k ques ons of staff about items not on the agenda. No formal decis ions ar e made during this agenda item. TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:I nformaonal U pdates DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D I nformaon w ill be s hared during the meeng with C ommis s ion member s about the follow ing items: s ummer s eas onal s taff recruitment arena's ice res urfacer relocaon project Rambling R iver C enter banquet room flooring D ew D ay s entertainment TO :Far mington Parks and Recreaon Commission M embers F R O M :R andy D istad, Parks and Recr eaon D irector S U B J EC T:Topics for March 11, 2020 M eeng A genda DAT E:Febr uary 12, 2020 B A C KG R O U N D T he following are pos s ible topics staff has idenfied for the Commission to cons ider including on the next meeng agenda: 1 . Review 2020 w or k plan 2 . D is cus s pos s ible par k and facility tour date(s ) to meet with the Rambling R iver C enter A dv is ory Boar d3 3 . 2019 department annual report pres entaon 4 . Review dra0 Park and Recreaon Commis s ion bylaw s 5 . C ity communicaon pres entaon 6 . Bike Pedes trian P lan priories 7 . Volunteeris m in the Par ks and Recreaon D epar tment